UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010

Commission File Number 333-135783

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida	20-3217152
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(~~IRS~~I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
525 Plymouth Road, Suite 310 Plymouth Meeting, PA	19462 (954) 728-2405
525 Plymouth Road, Suite 310
(Address of principal executive office)	(Zip Code) (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462	(954) 731-2002
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)	(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes  No x

The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of December 31, ~~2008~~2009, based on the closing sales price of the Common Stock as quoted on the ~~Nasdaq~~ Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board was $~~157~~1,~~984~~598,436.

As of October 1213, ~~2009~~2010, there were ~~103~~160,~~723~~423,~~986~~855 shares of registrant’s common stock outstanding.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report of WaterPure International, Inc. on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, particularly those identified with the words, “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends”, “objectives” and similar expressions. These statements reflect management's best judgment based on factors known at the time of such statements. The reader may find discussions containing such forward-looking statements in the material set forth under "Legal Proceedings" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis and Plan of Operations," generally, and specifically therein under the captions "Liquidity and Capital Resources" as well as elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed herein.

Although forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect the good faith judgment of our Management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include, without limitation, those specifically addressed under the heading "Risk Factors" below, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). You can read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You can obtain additional information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us.

We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made throughout the entirety of this annual Report, which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

References to Company Abbreviations (“we”, “our”, etc.) refer to WaterPure International, Inc.

References to the “Bulletin Board,” the “OTCBB” or the “OTC Bulletin Board” are to the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, a securities quotation service, which is accessible at the website www.otcbb.com.

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
PART I
Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	67
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	1012
Item 2.	Properties	1012
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	1012
Item 4.	~~Submission~~(Removed ofand ~~Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Reserved)	1012
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	1113
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	1113
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1214
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	1417
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	1418
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures	1619
Item 9A(T).	Controls and Procedures	16
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	19
Item 9B.	Other Information	1721
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	1821
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	1922
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	2124
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	2124
Item 14.	Principal ~~Accountant~~Accounting Fees and Services	2225
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, ~~and~~ Financial Statement Schedules	2326
	Signatures	2427

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

WaterPure International, Inc. was organized under the laws of the state of Florida on July 22, 2005 and conducts business as a marketer and manufacturer of Atmospheric Water Generators (“AWG”). Though originally structured as a marketing entity, we have now become a manufacturer of AWGs after licensing patents from Everest Corp. and developing our own new line of AWGs under those patents. This strategic decision has led to sales fluctuations due to allocation of resources to research and development in some of our previous operating periods.

We are a development stage company until the sale of these new products lead to recognition of significant revenue. We want to be identified as an environmentally sustainable business. Clean drinking water is becoming a scarce commodity as our population increases. Additionally, it is our goal, to utilize the intellectual property from Everest Corp. to become a leading worldwide manufacturer of AWGs based on the quality of our machines and our choice of distributors and marketing channels. Of course, our future results are highly dependent upon the success of our efforts to manufacture and market our products and having the ability to attain and attract qualified personnel and adequate working capital.

In December 2007, we entered into two worldwide license agreements with Everest Water Ltd. for the manufacturing and marketing rights to advanced models of AWGs. One license is a non-exclusive license for a stand-alone water generator and the second license is an exclusive license for a mineral additive water generator process that will permit the addition of organic minerals, flavors and other additives to the water produced by the AWGs.

We ~~previously~~ ~~purchased~~are ~~our~~selling ~~products~~units ~~from~~that awe ~~manufacturer~~manufacture in ~~South Korea under an Original Equipment Manufacturer arrangement. However, we have chosen to discontinue~~ our ~~supply~~new ~~relationship with the Korean manufacturer~~4,400 ~~but~~square wefoot ~~may reestablish~~facility ~~the~~in ~~relationship~~Oakland ~~at any time. Currently~~Park, ~~we are selling a unit that we are manufacturing ourselves in~~ Florida.

For the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, we had revenue of approximately $~~120,000~~45 thousand and net loss of approximately $~~1.42~~923 ~~million~~thousand.

Business Strategy

~~Currently we have focused on completion of our final production model of our new AWG, the WaterCycletm.~~ We have leased a 14,~~000~~400 sq. ft, . facility in ~~Margate~~Oakland Park, Florida that is in close proximity to our supplier of sheet metal used to build the ~~new units~~AWGs. Our efforts to market the units after production have led to the signing of contracts with distributors in Florida, France, the United Arab Emirates, the Cayman Islands, Great Britain, Columbia, Costa Rica and parts of Mexico. Also, rights of first refusal have been granted for ~~Illinois,~~ Venezuela ~~and Colombia~~.

We intend to generate and enhance revenues through the following measures:

• ~~Move~~Steady ~~into~~sales ~~larger~~growth ~~production~~through ~~facilities~~brand equity establishing WaterPure as the quality brand; • ~~Hire~~Reduce ~~more~~production ~~experienced~~cost by volume buying and ~~skilled~~increased ~~production~~manufacturing ~~staff~~efficiency; • Introducing new products in both larger and smaller capacities; and • Expand our marketing channels through a growing network of distributors and other methods.

We will need to raise sufficient capital nin order to accomplish these goals. We currently do not have any contracts or commitments for additional funding and there are no guarantees that funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Products and Suppliers

The basic technology employed by our products to produce water from air has been in use in other applications for many decades. Looking very much like the traditional water cooler (but without the inverted water bottle supplying the liquid), the WaterPure AWG stands in a residential or office environment and converts the moisture contained in the ambient air to water, providing a continuing supply of fresh, pure, hot or cold water. The essential processes employed by the water generator are simply evaporation and condensation. Water collected from this processes is then treated through various specialized filters and ultra violet light purification to obtain safe water output. Water produced from AWGs is not currently regulated by government authorities, however our water exceeds FDA standards for potable/drinking water. Since there is no revolutionary or unproven technology utilized in our process, we expect that the risks of failure of the product to perform as advertised are nominal.

Our current production line consists of the WatercycleTM AWG. This machine converts air into fresh drinking water. Our units operate on either 110 or 220 volt power and look similar to a typical water cooler, but do not connect to any water line. This avoids the need for bottled water delivery; heavy lifting of five gallon jugs; and of course does not use up the world’s precious water supply. The AWGs condensation and purification process takes water out of ambient air (humidity) and filters and purifies the water from any foreign matter, bacterial, organic and other impurities.4

WeOur ~~have been~~current ~~engaged~~production inline consists of the ~~development~~WatercycleTM AWG. ofThis amachine ~~new~~converts ~~AWG~~air ~~“the~~into ~~WatercycleTM”,~~fresh ~~in connection~~drinking ~~with~~water. ~~the~~Our ~~patent~~units ~~license~~operate weon ~~acquired~~either ~~from~~110 ~~Everest~~or ~~Water~~220 ~~Ltd.~~volt ~~This~~power ~~new device~~and ~~utilizes~~look ~~ozone~~similar to ~~eliminate~~a ~~microorganisms,~~typical ~~increases~~ water ~~producing ability~~cooler, ~~has~~but ado ~~more~~not ~~attractive~~connect ~~appearance~~to ~~and~~any ~~uses~~water ~~fewer~~line. ~~parts~~This ~~than~~avoids the ~~machines we~~need ~~are~~for ~~currently~~bottled ~~marketing.~~water ~~One~~delivery; ~~model~~heavy lifting of ~~the~~five ~~new~~gallon ~~AWG~~jugs; ~~will~~and ~~also~~of ~~include~~course ~~an optional~~does ~~feature~~not ~~that~~use ~~will~~up ~~permit~~ the ~~user~~world’s tolimited ~~add~~fresh ~~flavors~~water ~~and~~supply. ~~natural~~The ~~herbal additives,~~AWGs ~~such~~condensation asand ~~green~~purification ~~tea. We~~process ~~have~~takes ~~been~~water ~~marketing~~out ~~three~~of ~~models~~ambient ~~of AWGs~~air ~~from~~(humidity) ~~our~~and ~~existing~~filters ~~inventory~~and aspurifies ~~well~~the aswater ~~new~~to ~~purchases~~remove ~~from~~any ~~Liquid Air-Florida and have~~foreign ~~generated~~matter, ~~minimal~~bacterial, ~~revenues~~organic ~~from~~and ~~operations~~other impurities.

~~Customers~~We have been engaged in the development of a new AWG “the WatercycleTM”, in connection with the patent license from Everest Water Ltd. This new device utilizes ozone to eliminate microorganisms, increases water producing ability, has a more attractive appearance and uses fewer parts than the machines we are currently marketing. In the future, we intend to include an optional feature that will permit the user to add flavors and natural herbal additives, such as green tea.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

AWGs are suitable for home/small office use and for higher volume office or commercial use. They are currently sold in the United States (California, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York) as well as internationally (France, United Kingdom and Mexico). We do not intend to sell our AWGs as individual units to customers, but rather engage in distribution agreements in which we will sell units to distributors who purchase exclusive rights to various territories from us.

We are currently aligning our marketing and distribution program to place our AWG products into the consumer market and commercial marketplace through distributor relationships. Our intent is on establishing defined sales channels and supporting them with meaningful marketing programs to the extent that funds are available. We have sold a small number of units and have generated minimal revenues from operations.

We currently have contracts with distributors for France, United Arab Emirates, Florida, Great Britain, Columbia, Costa Rica, the Cayman Islands, and parts of Mexico. We are in the negotiation stages with ~~four~~ other potential distributors and have received inquiries from over a dozen others for various territories. All agreements are for an exclusive territory for a term of 24 months starting with our ability to manufacture machines, which occurred in June 2010. We are in the process of reviewing these and timing their contracts with our ability to produce and deliver units to them on a timely basis. A distributor is required to place a deposit to have an exclusive sales agreement with us. The size of the deposit depends on the territory and length of the exclusivity. As the distributor buys the machines their deposit is reduced as a $50 credit on each machine purchased until their deposit is depleted.

Manufacturing

We assemble our own AWG’s in our facility in Oakland Park, Florida. It is a modern facility that is equipped with compressors, high voltage electrical systems, air hoses, drills, pallet racks and a filling station to charge the cooling systems of the AWGs. The stainless steel structure of our current model, the WaterCycle, is primarily built for us in a near-by factory and delivered to us on an as needed basis. The compressors, water tanks and other large components are bought in high volume when possible depending on our cash available. The entire evaporator/condenser system is purchased as an assembled unit for easy assembly into the unit. We estimate that when we are able to have all stock in inventory on a timely basis we will be able to build a unit in thirty minutes. Each completed unit is then tested for 24 hours before being packed and shipped. Currently, our production capability is ten units’ daily using one shift and one assembly line. The facility has the ability to run three lines with three shifts so that we can produce up to 2,000 units a month.

Research and Development

We have dedicated a significant amount of time and resources to research and development activities and plan to increase our research and development efforts to improve the efficiencies associated with water production, ~~increase~~increasing water storage capacity, ~~expand~~expanding the effectiveness of filtration devices, and ~~enhance~~enhancing energy efficiency. For the ~~year~~years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, our Rresearch &and Ddevelopment expenses were approximately $113,000 and $18,000 respectively.

Competitive Advantage

The atmospheric water generator and filtration system industry is relatively new and rapidly evolving. Based on our research, we believe there are ~~possibly~~approximately 10 entities experimenting with the technology of water generation, of which five are direct, active competitors. Some of those companies have limited or no business activities while others have entered into strategic alliances with one another. The relatively high energy cost associated with changing water from its vapor phase in the air to the liquid phase appears to be an obstacle to making sales for a number of these competitors. Control of bacteria and viruses in the field of atmospheric water generation creates a technological challenge, which is a substantial barrier for others to enter this field.

Our previous AWG products are comparable to the others in the industry utilizing similar technologies with certain differences consistent with patented processes. Our new AWG, which we call the WatercycleTM, contains 50% fewer parts and has greater reliability than the competitive devices. Additionally, our WatercycleTM employs an ozone treatment to purify the water from all microorganisms as opposed to the UV (ultra violet) light applications utilized by other AWGs. This is an effective method of eliminating all bacteria and other microorganisms and has the additional benefit of being environmentally friendly inasmuch as there is no UV lamp to dispose and replace.5

Our previous AWG products are comparable to the others in the industry utilizing similar technologies with certain differences consistent with patented processes. Our new AWG, which we call the WatercycleTM , contains 50% fewer parts and has greater reliability than the competitive devices. Additionally, our WatercycleTM employs an ozone treatment to purify the water from all microorganisms as opposed to the UV (ultra violet) light applications utilized by other AWGs. This is an effective method of eliminating all bacteria and other microorganisms and has the additional benefit of being environmentally friendly inasmuch as there is no UV lamp to dispose and replace.

Today, governments and health professionals are starting to realize and understand the negative health effects of pollution, chemicals used to disinfect water supplies, and residual salt in desalinated water, and how they affect human bodies. We believe there is a robust market opportunity that exists for atmospheric water generators and filtration systems. These technologies can provide an alternative solution to the world’s shortage of fresh water and provide clean, safe drinking water in various geographical settings.

Patents, Licenses and Royalty Agreements

Everest Water, Ltd., the ~~Licensor~~licensor of our technology, has developed a new concept for a water-making machine. Everest Water has received U.S. patent #7,272,947 and has another patent pending in United States Patent No. Serial Number 11/833,491 filed August 3, 2007.

On December 7, 2007, we acquired rights to manufacture and market these patented AWGs pursuant to two worldwide license agreements entered into with Everest Water Ltd. One license is a non-exclusive license for a stand-alone water generator and the second license is an exclusive license for a mineral additive water generator process that will permit the addition of organic minerals, flavors and other additives to water produced by the machine. We agreed to pay $300,000 and issue 1,500,000 shares of our common stock valued at $330,000 as consideration for this agreement. We made a cash ~~payment~~payments of $50,000 with the execution of the agreement and an additional $10,000 in March 2008. The stock was to be issued in two allotments: 1,000,000 shares to be held until completion of the prototype machine and an additional 500,000 shares 90 days later. We agreed to pay Everest Water Ltd. an annual 8% royalty payment with a guaranteed minimum annual payment of $100,000 beginning in 2007. This agreement terminates with the expiration of the Everest patent, on September 3, 2024.

On August 1, 2008, we and Everest Water Ltd. modified payment terms of the licensing agreement. Under the modified terms, we ~~shall~~cancelled the shares to be issued to Everest and agreed to pay Everest $430,000 over 33 months starting September 1, 2008 and shall make annual 8% royalty payments to Everest within 20 days after the closing of each calendar quarter. The royalties have guaranteed minimum payments as follows: $50,000 year one, $60,000 year two, $70,000 year three, $90,000 year four and $100,000 each year after. The annual periods commence August 1, 2008, the date of execution of the revised agreement. ~~As of June 30, 2009, we have paid $13,000 and are $22,000 in arrears.~~

On March 30, 2010, we and Everest Water Ltd. modified the payment terms of their licensing agreement, because we could not meet the cash payment obligation under the original agreement, as amended. Under the amended payment terms, we pay Everest the balance owed Everest of $392,000 over 33 months starting April 1, 2010, plus annual 5% royalty payments with guaranteed minimum payments as follows: $30,000 in year one, $40,000 in year two, $50,000 in year three, $75,000 in year four and $100,000 each year after until the termination of the licensing agreement, which coincides with the expiration of the last patent in August 2027.

Competition

The atmospheric water generator, water purification and bottled water industries are highly competitive. This market segment includes numerous manufacturers, distributors, marketers, and retailers that actively compete for the business of consumers both in the United States and abroad. In addition, the market is highly sensitive to the introduction of new products and technologies that may rapidly capture a significant share of the market. As a result, our ability to remain competitive depends in part upon its successful introduction and consumer acceptance of new products. Although our products bear our own exclusive WaterPure branding, we expect that the competition will intensify in the future, since our competitors can and may duplicate many of the products or services offered by us.

The principal competition within the AWG industry comes from Air to Water, Inc. also known as World Wide Water Company. This company holds a patent for atmospheric water generators for various distributors, a similar water generating device and has product manufactured in China. Yuxin, a Chinese manufacturing company, also produces atmospheric water generators for various distributors.

The following are some of our other competitors:

Hyflux (www.hyflux.com) is a publicly traded company based in Singapore. Hyflux’s main business is in extremely large-scale water filtration and purification through membrane technology such as reverse osmosis and desalination. In January 2003, they announced that they had purchased a portion of a U.S. company, World Wide Air2Water, and also entered into a licensing agreement to manufacture air to water generators called the Dragonfly. Hyflux contracted the manufacturing of the Dragonfly units to a multi-billion dollar appliance manufacturer located in Qing Dao, China, called Haier.6

5Hyflux Ltd. (www.hyflux.com) is a publicly traded company based in Singapore. Hyflux’s main business is in extremely large-scale water filtration and purification through membrane technology such as reverse osmosis and desalination. In January 2003, they announced that they had purchased a portion of a U.S. company, World Wide Air2Water, and also entered into a licensing agreement to manufacture air to water generators called the Dragonfly. Hyflux contracted the manufacturing of the Dragonfly units to a multi-billion dollar appliance manufacturer located in Qing Dao, China, called Haier.

Dong Yang Co. Ltd., (www.dywater.net) is based in Kimpo, South Korea. The company has been involved with the manufacturing of residential/office water purification devices using Reverse Osmosis for 20 years. They entered the AWG water industry in 2002 with an upright full size unit known today as the M-10.

Wataire Industries (www.wataireindustries.com) is a publicly traded company with its corporate office in Vancouver, Canada. Having been in the atmospheric water business for a number of years, the company has kept a very low profile, only to rise again in the past year by revamping and redesigning their products. Wataire’s full-sized upright AWG is called the WII-4010. According to the website, Wataire’s manufacturing facility is located in Sydney, Australia. Additionally, Wataire also offers industrial/commercial water generators.

Government Regulation

The manufacturing, processing, testing, packaging, labeling and advertising of the products that we sell may be subject to regulation by one or more U.S. federal agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Community Supported Agriculture in North America, the United States Department of Agriculture, the Environmental Protection Agency, the standards provided by the United States Public Health Authority and the World Health Organization for drinking water. These activities may also be regulated by various agencies of the states, localities and foreign countries in which consumers reside. Currently, our AWGs are not subject to any governmental regulation although it is possible that the FDA may choose to regulate the quality of water that AWGs produce.

Since we are subject to a wide range of regulation covering every aspect of our business as mentioned above, we cannot predict the nature of any future U.S. laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative orders, when and if promulgated, would have on our business in the future. Although the regulation of water is less restrictive than that of drugs and food additives, we cannot assure you that the current statutory scheme and regulations applicable to water will remain less restrictive. Further, we cannot assure you that, under existing laws and regulations, or if more stringent statutes are enacted, regulations are promulgated or enforcement policies are adopted, we are or will be in compliance with these existing or new statutes, regulations or enforcement policies without incurring material expenses or adjusting our business strategy. Any laws, regulations, enforcement policies, interpretations or applications applicable to our business could require the reformulation of certain products to meet new standards, the recall or discontinuance of certain products not capable of reformulation, additional record keeping, expanded documentation of the properties of certain products, expanded or different labeling or scientific substantiation.

Employees

As of ~~September~~ 30October 11, ~~2009~~2010, we had ~~six~~10 employees, four of whom are ~~either~~ officers ~~and/or~~, ~~shareholders.~~two ~~The employees who~~ are ~~either~~office ~~officers~~staff and~~/or~~ ~~shareholders have~~four ~~received~~who nowork ~~cash~~in ~~compensation to date. We are accruing~~ the ~~annual~~manufacturing ~~salary to our CEO, which is $150,000~~process. Staffing levels will be determined as we progress and grow. Our Board of Directors determines the compensation of all new employees based upon job descriptions.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

~~Our company~~We ~~has~~have ~~limited~~a short operating history and ~~therefore~~have wenot ~~cannot~~produced ~~ensure~~significant ~~the long-term~~revenues. This ~~successful~~makes ~~operation~~it ofdifficult to evaluate our ~~business~~future orprospects and increases the ~~execution~~risk ofthat ~~our~~we ~~business plan~~will not be successful.

We have ~~only~~ ~~been~~a inshort ~~existence~~operating ~~and~~history ~~engaged~~with in our current business model, which involves the manufacture, marketing and ~~proposed~~distribution ~~business operations~~of atmospheric water generators. We have been in the development stage since ~~July~~inception in 2005 and have generated minimal revenues of $45,524 and $120,372 for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $237,826 from inception to June 30, 2010. No assurances can be given that we will generate any significant revenue, or any revenues at all, in the near term. As a result, we have ~~only~~ a very limited operating history ~~upon~~for ~~which~~ you ~~may~~to evaluate ~~our~~in ~~proposed~~assessing ~~business~~our ~~and~~future prospects. We ~~Our proposed~~are ~~business~~still considered a development stage company. Our operations ~~will~~since bewe ~~subject~~entered tothe ~~numerous~~development ~~risks,~~stage ~~uncertainties~~have not produced significant revenues, ~~expenses~~ and ~~difficulties~~may ~~associated~~not ~~with~~produce ~~early~~significant ~~stage~~revenues ~~enterprises~~in ~~and~~ the ~~development~~ near term, ~~production~~or ~~and~~at ~~sale~~all, ofwhich ~~the~~may ~~types~~harm ofour ~~products~~ability to obtain additional financing and ~~services~~may ~~that~~require ~~we offer~~us to reduce or discontinue our operations. You ~~should~~must consider anour ~~investment~~business and prospects in ~~our~~light of the risks and difficulties we will encounter as an early-stage company in ~~light~~a of new and rapidly evolving industry. We may not be able to successfully address these risks and difficulties, ~~uncertainties~~which could significantly harm our business, ~~expenses~~operating results, and ~~difficulties.~~financial ~~Such risks include:~~condition.

~~• the absence of an operating history;~~7

• insufficient capital;

• expected continual losses for the foreseeable future;

• our ability to anticipate and adapt to a developing market(s);

• acceptance by consumers of our products;

• limited marketing experience;

• reliance on our license agreement with Everest Water Ltd.;

• reliance on third party manufacturers for our AWGs;

• a competitive environment characterized by numerous, well-established and well-capitalized competitors;

• our ability to identify, attract and retain qualified personnel;

• our ability to provide superior customer service; and

• reliance on key personnel.

Because we are subject to these risks, you may have a difficult time evaluating our business and your investment in our Company. We may be unable to successfully overcome these risks which could harm our business.

Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by new and growing companies in the green technology and wellness fields in which we operate. We must meet many challenges including:

• establishing and maintaining broad market acceptance of products and converting that acceptance into customers;

• establishing and maintaining our brand name;

• timely and successfully introducing new products and increasing the functionality and features of existing products; and

• successfully responding to competition.

Our business strategy may be unsuccessful and we may be unable to address the risks we face in a cost-effective manner, if at all. If we are unable to successfully address these risks our business will be harmed.

We have a history of losses which may continue, which may negatively impact our ability to achieve our business objectives.

We incurred net losses of $1922,~~423,395~~791 and $21,~~289~~423,~~370~~395 for the years ended June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. In addition, at June 30, ~~2008~~2010, we had an accumulated deficit of $45,~~890~~813,~~357~~148 and a working capital deficit of $~~927~~829,~~551~~138. We cannot assure you that we can achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. Our operations are subject to the risks and competition inherent in the establishment of a business enterprise. There can be no assurance that future operations will be profitable. Revenues and profits, if any, will depend upon various factors, including whether we will be able to continue expansion of our revenue. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have an adverse impact on us.

Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain future financing.

In their report dated October 1215, ~~2009~~2010, our independent registered public accounting firm indicated that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of our minimal revenues, recurring net losses and our working capital deficiency. Our ability to continue as a going concern is subject to our ability to generate a profit and/or obtain necessary funding from outside sources, including obtaining additional funding from the sale of our securities, increasing sales or obtaining loans and grants from various financial institutions where possible. Our continued net operating losses increase the difficulty in meeting such goals and there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful.

If we are unable to obtain additional funding our business operations will be harmed.

Our business plan contemplates a rapid rollout of our AWGs through multiple channels, which will require significant capital. We will require additional funds to sustain our operations and institute our business plan. We anticipate that we will require up to approximately $2,000,000 to fund our anticipated operations for the next twelve months. Additional capital will be required to effectively support the operations and to otherwise implement our overall business strategy. Even if we do receive additional financing, it may not be sufficient to sustain or expand our development operations or continue our business operations.

If we do obtain additional financing our then existing shareholders may suffer substantial dilution.

We do not have any contracts or commitments for additional funding, and there can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. The inability to obtain additional capital will restrict our ability to grow and may reduce our ability to continue to conduct business operations. If we cannot raise the additional capital required to implement our business plan, we may be required to curtail operations or develop a different business strategy, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Further additional debt financing must be repaid regardless of whether or not we generate profits or cash flows from our business activities. Equity financing may result in dilution to existing stockholders and may involve securities that have rights, preferences, or privileges that are senior to our common stock.

Failure to achieve market acceptance of our products would result in lack of revenues.

Our business is primarily based on a new concept of atmospheric water generators. There is no assurance that our products will gain wide consumer acceptance or any acceptance. Market acceptance of our products may take a long time. The introduction of a new brand generally requires a minimum of twelve to eighteen months before a new product will receive market acceptance from consumers and retailers. If our products do not gain a sufficient level of consumer acceptance, our revenues could be adversely affected which would have a material impact on our business.

Our licensing agreement with Everest Water Ltd. is subject to termination in certain instances, which could result in a substantial loss of revenues from our products.

We have entered into a licensing arrangement with Everest Water Ltd., which grants us a worldwide, non-exclusive license for a stand-alone water generator and an exclusive license for a mineral additive water generator process that will permit the addition of organic minerals, flavors and other additives to the water produced by the machine. Under the terms of this arrangement, we are obligated to make certain minimum payments to Everest Water. Failure to meet these payments would result in a default under the contract. If the license terminates, we would no longer have the right to market and sell the atmospheric water generators, which we expect to account for substantially all of our products/sales in the immediate future. If this were to occur, we could likely experience a substantial loss of revenues from our products.

Inability to satisfy demand for our product would reduce our ability to gain a foothold in the market.

Even if our AWGs do gain consumer and retail acceptance, there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully meet the market's demand should our ~~manufacturers’~~ manufacturing capacity become limited or if we do not have sufficient capital to pay manufacturing costs. If we cannot meet the demand for our products, our ability to gain a foothold in the market may be compromised, with consumers turning to other products that are available in sufficient numbers.

Our lack of diversification will increase the risk of an investment in us, and our financial condition and results of operations may deteriorate if we fail to diversify.

Our current business focuses on one type of product in the water purification/filtration/delivery market, our atmospheric water generator. Larger companies have the ability to manage their risk by diversification. However, we currently lack diversification, in terms of both the nature and geographic scope of our business. As a result, we will likely be impacted more acutely by factors affecting our industry in which we operate, than we would if our business were more diversified, enhancing our risk profile.

If we fail to successfully introduce new products, we may lose market position.

New products, product improvements, line extensions or new packaging will be an important factor in our sales growth. If we fail to identify emerging consumer and technological trends, to maintain and improve the competitiveness of our existing products or to successfully introduce new products on a timely basis, we may lose market position. Continued product development and marketing efforts have all the risks inherent in the development of new products and line extensions, including development delays, the failure of new products and line extensions to achieve anticipated levels of market acceptance and the cost of failed product introductions.

If we need to replace suppliers, our expenses could increase resulting in smaller profit margins.

We compete with other companies for the production capacity of our suppliers and import quota capacity. Some of these competitors have greater financial and other resources than we have, and thus may have an advantage in the competition for production and import quota capacity. We cannot assure you that this additional capacity will be available when required on terms that are acceptable to us or similar to existing terms which we have with our suppliers, either from a production standpoint or a financial standpoint. We enter into purchase order commitments on an as-needed basis, specifying a time for delivery, method of payment, design and quality specifications and other standard industry provisions, but do not have long-term contracts with any suppliers. None of the suppliers we use produces our products exclusively.

Should we be forced to replace one or more of our suppliers, then we may experience an adverse financial impact, or an adverse operational impact, such as being forced to pay increased costs for such replacement manufacturing or delays upon distribution and delivery of our products to our customers, which could cause us to lose customers or lose revenues because of late shipments.

Our ~~trademark~~ ~~and~~continued ~~other~~success ~~intellectual~~depends ~~property~~on ~~rights~~our ~~may~~ability ~~not~~to beprotect ~~adequately~~our ~~protected outside~~intellectual ~~the~~property. ~~United~~The ~~States,~~failure ~~resulting~~to indo ~~loss~~so ofcould ~~revenue~~impact our profitability and stock price.

~~We believe~~Our ~~that~~success ~~our~~depends, ~~trademarks~~in part, ~~whether~~on ~~licensed~~our orability ~~owned~~to byobtain usand enforce patents, maintain trade-secret protection and ~~other~~ operate without infringing on the proprietary rights ~~are~~of ~~important~~third toparties. ~~our~~Litigation ~~success~~can ~~and~~be ~~our~~costly ~~competitive~~and ~~position~~time consuming. ~~In the~~Litigation ~~course~~expenses ofcould ~~our~~be ~~international~~significant. ~~expansion~~In addition, we may decide to settle legal claims, ~~however~~including certain pending claims, ~~experience~~despite ~~conflict with~~our ~~various~~beliefs ~~third~~on ~~parties~~the ~~who~~probability ~~acquire~~of orsuccess ~~claim~~on ~~ownership~~the ~~rights~~merits, into ~~certain trademarks.~~avoid Welitigation ~~cannot~~expenses ~~assure~~as ~~that~~well as the ~~actions~~diversion of management resources. While we have ~~taken~~been toissued ~~establish~~licenses for patents and ~~protect~~ ~~these~~have registered trademarks ~~and~~with ~~other~~respect ~~proprietary~~to ~~rights~~our ~~will~~product beand ~~adequate~~technology, ~~to prevent~~our ~~imitation~~competitors ofmay ~~our~~infringe ~~products~~upon byour ~~others~~patents or totrademarks, ~~prevent~~independently ~~others~~develop ~~from~~similar ~~seeking~~or ~~to block~~superior ~~sales~~products ofor technologies, duplicate our ~~products~~designs, astrademarks, aprocesses ~~violation~~or ofother ~~the~~intellectual ~~trademarks~~property ~~and~~or ~~proprietary rights~~design ofaround ~~others.~~any ~~Also,~~processes weor ~~cannot~~designs ~~assure~~on ~~you~~which ~~that~~we ~~others~~have ~~will~~or ~~not~~may ~~assert~~obtain ~~rights in,~~patents or ~~ownership~~trademark ofprotection. In addition, ~~trademarks~~it ~~and~~is ~~other~~possible ~~proprietary~~that ~~rights~~third ofparties ~~ours~~may have or acquire other technology or designs that we ~~will~~ bemay ~~able~~use or desire to ~~successfully~~use, ~~resolve~~so ~~these~~that ~~types~~we ofmay ~~conflicts~~need to ~~our satisfaction.~~acquire Inlicenses ~~addition~~to, or to contest the ~~laws~~validity of, ~~certain~~such ~~foreign~~third-party ~~countries~~patents or trademarks. Such licenses may not ~~protect proprietary~~be ~~rights~~made available to ~~the~~us ~~same~~on ~~extent~~acceptable asterms, doif at all, and we may not prevail in contesting the ~~laws~~validity of ~~the~~such ~~United States~~third-party rights.

In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also protect trade secrets, know-how and other confidential information against unauthorized use by others or disclosure by persons who have access to them, including our employees, through contractual arrangements. These agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information. If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies, we may lose market share to competing products using the same or similar technology.

Litigation brought by third parties claiming infringement of their intellectual property rights or trying to invalidate intellectual property rights owned or used by us may be costly and time consuming.

We may face lawsuits from time to time alleging that our products infringe on third-party intellectual property, and/or seeking to invalidate or limit our ability to use our intellectual property. If we become involved in litigation, we may incur substantial expense defending these claims and the proceedings may divert the attention of management, even if we prevail. An adverse determination in proceedings of this type could subject us to significant liabilities, allow our competitors to market competitive products without a license from us, prohibit us from marketing our products or require us to seek licenses from third parties that may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

Our business is exposed to domestic and foreign currency fluctuations; negative changes in exchange rates could result in greater costs.

We ~~generally~~ purchase our products in U.S. dollars. However, we obtain most of our products from overseas and the cost of these products may be affected by changes in the value of the relevant currencies. Changes in currency exchange rates may also affect the relative prices at which we and our foreign competitors sell products in the same market, resulting in higher costs to us. We currently do not hedge our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We cannot assure you that foreign currency fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are highly dependent on our management and our business would be materially adversely affected if any of our executives leave.

The operations and financial success of our company are significantly dependent on Paul S. Lipschutz, our Chief Executive Officer. We do not maintain key man life insurance on Mr. Lipschutz. Also, should he become unable or unwilling to continue to direct operations, we may lack the funds and financial resources to replace departing management and we would be materially adversely ~~affected.~~ ~~Operations could be materially~~ affected and under certain circumstances, shareholders ~~would~~could lose their entire investment.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock:

If we fail to remain current in our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as us, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Our common stock is not currently traded at high volume, and you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to sell or liquidate a substantial number of shares at one time.

Our common stock is currently traded, but with very low, if any, volume, based on quotations on the “Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board”, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is still relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that trading levels will be sustained.

Shareholders should be aware that, according to Commission Release No. 34-29093, the market for “penny stocks” has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the future volatility of our share price.

We have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our common stock will depend on earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors affecting it at such time as the board of directors may consider relevant.

Efforts to comply with recently enacted changes in securities laws and regulations will increase our costs and require additional management resources, and we still may fail to comply.

~~In accordance~~As ~~with~~directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules ~~which~~requiring ~~require~~ public companies to include a report of management on ~~our~~ their internal controls over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K. In addition, in the event we become a non-accelerated filer, the independent registered public accounting firm auditing our financial statements ~~must~~ would be required to attest to ~~and~~the ~~report~~effectiveness onof our internal controls over financial reporting. ~~While the~~Such ~~requirements~~attestation ofrequirement ~~section~~by ~~404(a)~~our ~~are~~independent ~~applicable~~registered ~~this~~public ~~year,~~accounting ~~the~~firm ~~section~~would ~~404(b) requirements are~~ not ~~presently~~be applicable to us, ~~but~~until wethe ~~will~~report ~~become subject to these requirements~~ for the ~~fiscal~~ year ~~ending~~ended ~~June~~December 3031, ~~2010.~~2011 ~~When~~at ~~section~~the ~~404(b) regulations become applicable to us~~earliest, ~~and~~ if at all. If we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting or if our independent ~~auditors~~ ~~are~~registered ~~unable~~public accounting firm is required to, ~~provide~~but usis ~~with~~unable to provide an unqualified ~~report~~ opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting ~~as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our securities. WeTo ~~have~~date, ~~not~~we ~~yet~~do ~~begun~~not abelieve ~~formal~~that ~~process~~we ~~to document~~have ~~and~~obtained ~~test~~the ~~our~~necessary ~~internal~~expertise ~~controls~~to ~~over~~comply ~~financial~~with ~~reporting~~and, ~~(see~~in ~~Item~~fact, ~~9A(T) Controls~~we ~~and~~have ~~Procedures).~~not ~~Given~~complied ~~the~~with ~~status~~Section 404(a) of ~~our~~the ~~efforts,~~Sarbanes-Oxley ~~coupled~~Act ~~with~~of ~~the~~2002 ~~fact that~~and ~~guidance~~we ~~from~~do ~~regulatory~~not ~~authorities~~currently inhave the ~~area~~resources ~~of internal controls continues~~ to ~~evolve,~~obtain ~~substantial~~expertise ~~uncertainty~~or ~~exists regarding our ability~~ to ~~comply~~ byachieve ~~applicable deadlines~~compliance.

Our common stock is subject to the "~~Penny~~penny ~~Stock~~stock" rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:

·	that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks; and

·	the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

·	obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and

·	make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

·	sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and

·	that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our executive office is located at 525 Plymouth Road, Suite 310, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462. The rent for the office space is $500 a month and we have a month-to-month lease.

In ~~June 2007~~March 2010, we ~~opened~~moved athe ~~regional~~manufacturing and research and development operations ~~center~~and atthe ~~1975~~administrative, Esales ~~Sunrise~~and ~~Boulevard~~customer relations departments to a 4,400 ~~Fort Lauderdale~~sq. ft. facility in Oakland Park, Florida. We entered into a ~~month-to-month~~five year lease for $~~543~~ 2,729 per month~~. This~~ ~~facility~~with ~~accommodates~~annual ~~our~~increases ~~administrative,~~of ~~sales~~seven ~~and customer relations personnel~~percent.

In May 2009, we moved the manufacturing and research and development operations to a 1,000 sq. ft, facility in Margate, Florida. We entered into a month-to-month lease for $1,200 per month.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are currently not a party to any material legal proceedings or claims.

ITEM 4. ~~SUBMISSION~~(REMOVED OFAND ~~MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~RESERVED)

~~None.~~12

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

~~PRICE RANGE~~Price OFRange ~~COMMON~~of ~~STOCK~~Common Stock

Our common stock is currently traded on the ~~NASDAQ~~ Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “WPUR.” ~~Prior to January 2007, there was no trading market for our common stock.~~ For the period from ~~January~~July 1, ~~2007~~2008 to date, the following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of our common stock as reported by the ~~NASDAQ~~ Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.

Period	High		~~Low~~	Low
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009:
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010:
First Quarter	$	0.~~140~~020	$	~~0.020~~$	0.006
Second Quarter		0.~~039~~020		~~0.004~~	0.008
Third Quarter		0.~~025~~021		~~0.004~~	0.011
Fourth Quarter		0.~~020~~025		~~0.010~~	0.010
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008:
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009:
First Quarter	$	0.~~700~~140	$	~~0.220~~$	0.020
Second Quarter		0.~~400~~039		~~0.150~~	0.004
Third Quarter		0.~~240~~025		~~0.110~~	0.004
Fourth Quarter		0.~~200~~020		~~0.070~~	0.010

On October 913, ~~2009~~2010, the closing sale price of our common stock, as reported by the ~~NASDAQ~~ Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, was $0.01011 per share. On October 1213, ~~2009~~ 2010, there were ~~175~~249 holders of record of our common stock.

~~DIVIDEND POLICY~~Dividend Policy

We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to fund ongoing operations and future capital requirements of our business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board deems relevant.

~~RECENT SALE~~Recent OFSale ~~UNREGISTERED~~of ~~SECURITIES~~Unregistered ~~AND~~Securities ~~EQUITY~~and ~~PURCHASES~~Equity BYPurchases ~~THE~~by ~~COMPANY~~the Company

During the quarter ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, we issued 75,~~343~~450,~~400~~000 shares of our common stock for consulting services totaling $~~105~~98,~~864~~100.

During the quarter ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, in separate transactions, we sold in private placements ~~500~~2,400,000 shares of our common stock at $.~~0024~~005 per share for a total of $112,~~200~~000, 7250,~~600,~~000 shares at $.~~005~~004 per share for a total of $381,000, ~~and 6~~5,~~000~~500,000 shares at $.~~0015~~01 per share for a total of $955,000 and 1,400,000 shares of our common stock at $.007 for a total of $10,500. The fair values of the shares were determined based on the closing market price of the shares at the date of the agreements.

Unless otherwise noted in this section, with respect to the sale of unregistered securities referenced above, all transactions were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"), and Regulation D or Regulation S promulgated under the 1933 Act. In each instance, the purchaser had access to sufficient information regarding WaterPure International, Inc. so as to make an informed investment decision. More specifically, we had a reasonable basis to believe that each purchaser was an "accredited investor" as defined in Regulation D or Regulation S of the 1933 Act and otherwise had the requisite sophistication to make an investment in our securities.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

We do not have any equity compensation plans.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”

1113

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect Management's current views with respect to future events and financial performance. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate” and “continue,” or similar words. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of us and members of our ~~its~~ management team as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risk and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.

Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the SEC. Important factors currently known to Management could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in the future operating results over time. We believe that ~~its~~our assumptions are based upon reasonable data derived from and known about our business and operations and the business and operations of the Company. No assurances are made that actual results of operations or the results of our future activities will not differ materially from its assumptions. Factors that could cause differences include, but are not limited to, expected market demand for the Company’s services, fluctuations in pricing for materials, and competition.

General

We are a developing stage company, currently selling our products through our distribution and marketing programs, which consists of placing our product in retail establishments and through distributors. In December 2007, we entered into agreements, as subsequently amended, with Everest Water Ltd. for the manufacturing and marketing rights to advanced models of ~~our product~~AWGs. Our primary focus will be on strengthening the defined sales channels and supporting them with meaningful marketing programs to the extent that funds are available. We have sold our first units and have generated minimal revenues from operations.

Our current burn rate of available capital is currently unable to support operations for the next 12 months. We ~~This~~believe ~~consists~~operations ofwill ~~approximately~~require approximately $2,000,000 for manufacturing, accounting, legal, technical support, web maintenance and service equipment, travel, telephone and office supplies. An additional $100,000 would be utilized for the production and execution of our marketing support program. We are currently working on raising ~~enough~~ capital to cover these expenditures. We currently do not have any contracts or commitments for additional funding and there are no guarantees that funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Our plan of operations for the next 12 months will be the continued development of our distribution and marketing channels in our selected launch markets and the continued expansion of our product line to afford us a larger market into which we may sell our product. We plan to conduct additional product research and development through manufacturing partnerships so we do not intend to purchase any additional significant equipment at this time. In addition, we do not expect a significant change in the number of employees.

Results of Operations

For the Fiscal Year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 Compared to the Fiscal Year ended June 30, ~~2008~~ 2009

Revenue and Net Loss

Revenue for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 was $~~120~~45,~~372~~524, ana ~~increase~~decrease of $5474,~~372~~848 or ~~82.4~~62% from approximately $66120,000 for the comparable period in ~~2008~~2009 and we incurred a net loss of approximately $~~1.42~~923,000 ~~million~~ for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 as compared to a net loss of approximately $21.2942 million for the year ended June 30, ~~2008~~2009. The ~~increase~~decrease in revenue for the year was primarily attributable to ~~strategic~~ ~~planning~~the delays in manufacturing our own AWG, ~~having~~which ~~capital~~resulted from difficulty in getting a computer circuit board to ~~manufacture~~work ~~AWGs~~to ~~and developing revenue-generating~~our ~~opportunities~~satisfaction. This matter was resolved in June 2010. The decrease in loss is directly attributable to a decrease in general and administrative expenses as described below as well as a positive impact from amending our license and royalty agreement with Everest Ltd, which resulted in a gain on troubled debt restructuring of $339,137.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold consists of direct costs on contracts, materials, direct labor, third party subcontractor services, union benefits and other overhead costs. Our cost of revenue was approximately $9032,~~500~~000 or ~~75.2~~70% of revenue for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, compared to approximately $6890,~~000~~500 or ~~103~~75.2% for the prior year. The ~~decrease~~lower cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales is due to ~~higher~~negotiating ~~sales~~better ~~volume~~prices ~~and~~for ~~better cost~~parts ~~controls~~however onthis ~~the~~contributed ~~parts~~to ~~for~~manufacturing delays in assembling our own machine. In the past, we sold machines purchased from a third party.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 were approximately $1,~~256~~062,~~707~~000, a decrease of $~~950~~195,~~795~~000 compared to approximately $21,~~207~~257,~~502~~000 for the comparable period in ~~2008.~~ 2009 The overall decrease resulted from decreases of $~~257~~136,~~937~~000 in officer compensation ($~~657~~400,~~937~~000 for the year ended June 30, ~~2008~~2009 compared to $~~400~~264,000 for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010), $~~445~~29,~~063~~000 in stock compensation to others ~~($892,101~~and ~~for the year ended June 30, 2008 compared to~~ $~~447~~29,~~038~~000 ~~for~~due ~~the year ended June 30, 2009), $118,369 in professional expenses ($290,217 for the year ended June 30, 2008 compared~~ to ~~$171,848~~reduced ~~for the year ended June 30~~advertising, ~~2009)~~marketing, ~~$44,058 in~~ meals and entertainment ~~expense~~and ($54,664 for the year ended June 30, 2008 compared to $10,606 for the year ended June 30, 2009), $24,829 in rent expense ($39,008 for the year ended June 30, 2008 compared to $14,179 for the year ended June 30, 2009), $49,360 in travel ~~expense ($64,452 for the year ended June 30, 2008 compared to $15,092 for the year ended June 30, 2009) and $11,179 in other~~ expenses.

Interest Expense

There was $1326,~~417~~700 in interest expense for the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 compared to $1013,~~275~~ 400 for the year ended June 30, ~~2008~~2009. The increase is due to the increase of interest bearing debt. ~~The short-term loans from shareholders and officers carry no interest.~~

Income Tax Expenses

We have incurred only losses to date and therefore have no income tax expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, we have generated minimal revenues and have incurred operating losses in every quarter. We are a development stage company, have not generated significant revenues from operations and have incurred significant losses since inception. These factors among others raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

As of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, we had a working capital deficiency of $~~927~~829,~~551~~138. For the twelve months ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, we had net cash outflow from operating activities of ~~$237~~ 656,~~302~~711. Cash provided by financing activities totaled $~~231~~702,~~881~~451 for the twelve months ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010.

We expect significant capital expenditures during the next 12 months for manufacturing products, license payments and plant expansion. We are currently seeking joint venture partners and equity financing to fund these expenditures, although we do not have any contracts or commitments for either at this time. We will have to raise additional funds to continue manufacturing our AWGs and, while we have been successful in doing so in the past, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in the future. Our continuation as a going concern for a period longer than the current fiscal year is dependent upon our ability to obtain necessary additional funds to continue operations and the attainment of profitable operations.

By adjusting our operations to the level of capitalization, and through short term loans from officers we believe we will have sufficient capital resources to meet projected cash flow deficits in the near term. However, if during that period, or thereafter, we are not successful in generating sufficient liquidity from operations or in raising sufficient capital resources, on terms acceptable to us, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

We presently do not have any available credit, bank financing or other external sources of liquidity. Due to our ~~brief~~ history and historical operating losses, our operations have not been a source of liquidity. We will need to obtain additional capital in order to expand operations and become profitable. In order to obtain capital, we may need to sell additional shares of our common stock or borrow funds from private lenders. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining additional funding.

We will still need additional capital in order to continue operations until we are able to achieve positive operating cash flow. Additional capital is being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other financing mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and a downturn in the U.S. stock and debt markets could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Furthermore, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.

On October 22, 2009, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Mayim Tahor, LLC (“Mayim”) providing for the sale by us to Mayim of up to 100 shares of our series A convertible preferred stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) at a price of $2,500 per share. On June 18, 2010 this agreement was amended to allow the purchase of up to 200 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. Through June 30, 2010, Mayim purchased 122 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for $305,000.

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has a stated value of $2,500 (the “Stated Value”), is entitled to a cumulative dividend of six percent (6%) of the Stated Value per annum, payable semi-annually. In addition, each share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive a royalty payment of $0.16 for each atmospheric water generator we sell. We owe $648 in royalties pursuant to the Series A Preferred Stock as of June 30, 2010.

We refinanced our November 18, 2008 convertible debt and accrued interest ($1,200) thereon by entering into a new Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on November 4, 2009 for the issuance of a $11,200 convertible note. The convertible note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.005 per share.

On March 11, 2010, we issued 250,000 shares of common stock and a $25,000 promissory note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and was due April 12, 2010. On April 12, 2010, the term of the note plus accrued interest of $375 was extended to June 17, 2010. On June 17, 2010, this note, plus accrued interest of $761, was exchanged for a convertible debenture.

On March 30, 2010, we issued a $30,000 promissory note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 6% per annum and is due March 30, 2011. This note was converted into 12 shares of Series A Preferred Stock on June 18, 2010.

On April 26, 2010, we issued a $15,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand.

On May 3, 2010, we issued 250,000 shares of common stock and a $25,000 promissory note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and was due June 3, 2010. We refinanced this note and the accrued interest of $375 into a Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 17, 2010.

On May 5, 2010, we issued 250,000 shares of common stock and a $25,000 promissory note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and was due June 3, 2010. We refinanced this note and the accrued interest of $375 into a Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 17, 2010.

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on April 1, 2010 for the issuance of a $1,667 convertible note. The convertible note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.005 per share.

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on April 29, 2010 for the issuance of a $1,667 convertible note. The convertible note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.005 per share.

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on April 30, 2010 for the issuance of a $1,667 convertible note. The convertible note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.005 per share.

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on May 10, 2010 for the issuance of a $50,000 convertible note. The convertible note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.015 per share.

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on May 10, 2010 for the issuance of a $25,000 convertible note. The convertible note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.015 per share.

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on May 14, 2010 for the issuance of a $20,000 convertible note. The convertible note accrues interest at 12% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.015 per share.

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on June 17, 2010 by combining the $25,000 Note originally dated March 11, 2010, the $25,000 Note date May 3, 2010, the $25,000 note dated May 5, 2010, accrued interest of $2,500 and cash of $20,000 into the issuance of a $97,500 convertible note and 250,000 shares of our common stock. The convertible note accrues interest at 18% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.01 per share.

We entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on June 17, 2010 for the issuance of a $35,000 convertible note and 250,000 shares of our common stock. The convertible note accrues interest at 18% per annum and is due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal into shares of our common stock at $0.005 per share.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.

We have certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments that include future estimated payments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions, changing interest rates, and other factors may result in actual payments differing from the estimates. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing and amounts of payments.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These accounting principles require us to exercise significant judgment ~~about future events~~ that affect the amounts reported throughout our financial statements. Actual events could unfold quite differently than our previous judgments had predicted. Therefore the estimates and assumptions inherent in the financial statements included in this report could be materially different once those actual events are known. We believe the following policies may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity in their application and represent critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our financial statements. If different assumptions or estimates were used, our financial statements could be materially different from those included in this report.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenues in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (SAB 104). We sell atmospheric water generators. Revenue from such product sales isare recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. At this time the earnings process is complete and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer, which is generally when the goods are shipped and all our significant obligations have been satisfied.

Accounts Receivable

We must make judgments about the collectibility of our accounts receivable to be able to present them at their net realizable value on the balance sheet. To do this, we carefully analyze the aging of our customer accounts, try to understand why accounts have not been paid, and review historical bad debt problems. From this analysis, we record an estimated allowance for receivables that we believe will ultimately become uncollectible. As of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, we had an allowance for bad debts of $~~22,759~~0. We actively manage our accounts receivable to minimize our credit risks and believe that our current allowance for doubtful accounts is fairly stated.

Reliability of Inventory Values

We make judgments about the ultimate realizability of our inventory in order to record our inventory at ~~its~~the lower of cost or market. These judgments involve reviewing current demand for our products in comparison to present inventory levels and reviewing inventory costs compared to current market values.

Long-lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets

We account for our long-lived assets by requiring that long-lived assets and certain intangible assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss is to be recognized based on the fair value of the assets.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, "Subsequent Events", ("SFAS 165"), which establishes general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statement are issued or available to be issuedNone. In particular, SFAS 165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements' and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. It is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		Page
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		F-1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Balance Sheets		F-2
Statements of Operations		F-3
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency)		F-4
Statements of Cash Flows		F-69
Notes to Financial Statements		F-710 to F-1626

1518

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of

WaterPure International, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of WaterPure International, Inc. (a development stage company) (the “Company”) as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and June 30, ~~2008~~ 2009, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from inception (~~June~~July 22, 2005) through June 30, ~~2009~~2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of WaterPure International, Inc. as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from inception (~~June~~July 22, 2005) through June 30, ~~2009~~2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss since its inception totaling approximately $45.898 million, has earned minimal revenues and has a working capital deficiency as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 2. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ CCR, LLP

Glastonbury, Connecticut

October 12 15, ~~2009~~2010

F-1

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009

	2010			2009
ASSETS

Cash	$	45,740		$	-
Accounts receivable - net of allowance ($0 at June 30, 2010 and $22,759 at June 30, 2009)		1,000			-
Inventories		78,723			15,960

Total current assets		125,463			15,960

Trademark		325			325
Security deposit		6,000			-
Intangible asset - license, net of accumulated amortization		926,286			992,221

Total assets	$	1,058,074		$	1,008,506

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	127,460		$	120,888
Accrued expenses		291,908			282,532
Accrued royalties payable - current		30,000			50,000
Licensing fees - current		57,500			167,000
Deposits - current		-			1,800
Notes payable		40,000			25,000
Convertible notes payable		214,429			105,938
Due to officers		88,508			103,229
Due to stockholders		104,796			87,124

Total current liabilities		954,601			943,511

Accrued royalties payable - net of current portion		520,154			735,053
Licensing fees - net of current portion		259,774			185,983
Deferred revenue		186,100			98,400

Total liabilities		1,920,629			1,962,947

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Common stock, par value $.0001 per share; 250,000,000 authorized		14,903			9,242
Common stock to-be-issued		10,500			2,500
Additional paid-in-capital		4,925,190			3,924,174
Preferred series A stock, par value $.001 per share; 1,000,000 authorized		-			-
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(5,813,148	)		(4,890,357	)

Total stockholders' deficiency		(862,555	)		(954,441	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficiency)	$	1,058,074		$	1,008,506

~~(A DEVELOPMENT~~The ~~STAGE~~accompanying ~~COMPANY)~~notes are an integral part of these financial statements

BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

	2009			2008
ASSETS
Cash	$	-		$	5,421
Accounts receivable - net of allowance ($22,759 at June 30, 2009 and $2,762 at June 30, 2008)		-			-
Inventories		15,960			87,957
Total current assets		15,960			93,378
Trademark		325			325
Intangible asset - license, net of accumulated amortization		992,221			1,056,785
Total assets	$	1,008,506		$	1,150,488
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	120,888		$	122,641
Accrued expenses		282,532			133,921
Accrued royalties payable - current		50,000			-
Licensing fees - current		167,000			230,000
Deferred revenue - current		1,800			-
Notes payable		25,000			25,000
Convertible debt		105,938			50,000
Due to officers		103,229			98,053
Due to stockholders		87,124			105,169
Total current liabilities		943,511			764,784
Accrued royalties payable - non current		735,053			496,373
Licensing fees - non current		185,983			-
Deferred revenue - non current		98,400			-
Total Liabilities		1,962,947			1,261,157
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Common stock, par value $.0001 per share; 250,000,000 authorized		9,242			3,147
Common stock to be issued		2,500			355,000
Additional paid in capital		3,924,174			2,998,146
Accumulated deficit		(4,890,357	)		(3,466,962	)
Total stockholders' deficiency		(954,441	)		(110,669	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency	$	1,008,506		$	1,150,488

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND JUNE 30, 2009 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005
(INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010

							July 22, 2005
	Year			Year			(inception)
	ended			ended			through
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2010			2009			2010

REVENUES	$	45,524		$	120,372		$	237,826

COST OF GOODS SOLD		32,054			90,478			193,599

Gross profit		13,470			29,894			44,227

EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses		1,062,391			1,256,707			5,686,995

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(1,048,921	)		(1,226,813	)		(5,642,768	)

Gain on restucturing of troubled debt		(339,137	)		-			(339,137	)
Interest expense		26,700			13,417			70,457
Accretion of accrued royalties and licensing fees		96,529			100,163			228,201
Amortization expense		89,778			83,002			210,859

Loss before provision for income taxes		(922,791	)		(1,423,395	)		(5,813,148	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-			-

Net loss	$	(922,791	)	$	(1,423,395	)	$	(5,813,148	)

Net loss per share basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.12	)

Weighted average per common share		114,891,338			54,972,043			46,892,311

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND JUNE 30, 2008 AND FOR THE PERIOD

FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009

							July 22,2005
	Year			Year			(inception)
	ended			ended			through
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008			June 30, 2009
REVENUES	$	120,372		$	65,651		$	192,302
COST OF GOODS SOLD		90,478			67,656			161,545
Gross profit/(loss)	$	29,894		$	(2,005	)	$	30,757
EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses		1,256,707			2,207,502			4,624,604
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(1,226,813	)		(2,209,507	)		(4,593,847	)
Interest expense		13,417			10,275			43,757
Accretion of accrued royalties and licensing fees		100,163			31,509			131,672
Amortization expense		83,002			38,079			121,081
Loss before provision for income taxes		(1,423,395	)		(2,289,370	)		(4,890,357	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-
Net loss	$	(1,423,395	)	$	(2,289,370	)	$	(4,890,357	)
Net loss per share basic and diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.16	)
Weighted average per common share		54,972,043			24,125,379			31,381,235

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010

	Common stock to-be-issued				Common stock issued and outstanding				Preferred series A issued and outstanding				Additonal paid-in-capital		Deficit accumulated during the development stage			Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Balance July 22, 2005 (inception)		-	$	-		-	$	-		-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-

Common stock to be issued in connection with Incoproation (July 22, 2005)		4,000,000	$	10,000		-		-		-		-		-		-			10,000

Common stock to be issued for consulting services		16,150,000		40,375		-		-		-		-		-		-			40,375

Common stock issued - private placement, net of issuance costs of $58,255		461,750		126,445		-		-		-		-		-		-			126,445

Net loss		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(64,361	)		(64,361	)

Balance June 30, 2006		20,611,750	$	176,820		-	$	-		-	$	-	$	-	$	(64,361	)	$	112,459

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIENCY)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE, 2009

	Common stock-to-be-issued						Common stock issued and outstanding				Additonal paid-in-capital		Deficit accumulated during the development stage			Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount
Balance July 22, 2005 (inception)		-		$	-			-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Common stock to be issued in connection with Incorporation (July 22, 2005)		4,000,000			10,000			-		-		-		-			10,000
Common stock to be issued for consulting services		16,150,000			40,375			-		-		-		-			40,375
Common stock issued - private placement, net of issuance costs of $58,255		461,750			126,445			-		-		-		-			126,445
Net loss		-			-			-		-		-		(64,361	)		(64,361	)
Balance June 30, 2006		20,611,750			176,820			-		-		-		(64,361	)		112,459
Issuance of shares		(20,611,750	)		(176,820	)		20,611,750		2,061		174,759		-			-
Beneficial conversion of loan discount		-			-			-		-		18,750		-			18,750
Common stock issued for consulting services		-			-			660,000		66		622,334		-			622,400
Issuance of options for compensation		-			-			-		-		231,300		-			231,300
Net loss		-			-			-		-		-		(1,113,231	)		(1,113,231	)
Balance June 30, 2007		-			-			21,271,750		2,127		1,047,143		(1,177,592	)		(128,322	)
Common stock to be issued		1,750,000			355,000			-		-		-		-			355,000
Issuance of shares		-			-			4,330,000		433		468,567		-			469,000
Issuance of shares as repayment of amount due to stockholders		-			-			467,626		47		70,097		-			70,144
Common stock issued for consulting services		-			-			5,277,500		528		829,101		-			829,629
Issuance of options for compensation		-			-			-		-		582,937		-			582,937
Exercise of options		-			-			125,000		12		301		-			313
Net loss		-			-			-		-		-		(2,289,370	)		(2,289,370	)
Balance June 30, 2008		1,750,000		$	355,000			31,471,876	$	3,147	$	2,998,146	$	(3,466,962	)	$	(110,669	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010

	Common stock to-be-issued						Common stock issued and outstanding				Preferred series A issued and outstanding				Additonal paid-in-capital		Deficit accumulated during the development stage			Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Issuance of shares		(20,611,750	)		(176,820	)		20,611,750		2,061		-		-		174,759		-			-

Beneficial conversion of loan discount		-			-			-		-		-		-		18,750		-			18,750

Common stock issued for consulting services		-			-			660,000		66		-		-		622,334		-			622,400

Issuance of options as compensation		-			-			-		-		-		-		231,300		-			231,300

Net loss		-			-			-		-		-		-		-		(1,113,231	)		(1,113,231	)

Balance June 30, 2007		-		$	-			21,271,750	$	2,127		-	$	-	$	1,047,143	$	(1,177,592	)	$	(128,322	)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIENCY)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009

(continued)

	Common stock to-be-issued						Common stock issued and outstanding				Additonal paid-in-capital		Deficit accumulated during the development stage			Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount
Cancellation of common stock to-be-issued		(1,500,000	)		(330,000	)		-		-		-		-			(330,000	)
Issuance of shares		(250,000	)		(25,000	)		20,849,999		2,085		113,615		-			90,700
Issuance of shares as repayment of amount due to officers		-			-			1,000,000		100		49,900		-			50,000
Issuance of shares as repayment of amount due to stockholders		-			-			666,111		67		41,483		-			41,550
Beneficial conversion of loan discount		-			-			-		-		22,500		-			22,500
Common stock issued for consulting services		-			-			38,436,000		3,843		697,038		-			700,881
Issuance of options as compensation		-			-			-		-		1,492		-			1,492
Common stock to-be-issued		500,000			2,500			-		-				-			2,500
Net loss		-			-			-		-		-		(1,423,395	)		(1,423,395	)
Balance June 30, 2009		500,000		$	2,500			92,423,986	$	9,242	$	3,924,174	$	(4,890,357	)	$	(954,441	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010

	Common stock to-be-issued				Common stock issued and outstanding				Preferred series A issued and outstanding				Additonal paid-in-capital		Deficit accumulated during the development stage			Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Common stock to-be-issued		1,750,000	$	355,000		-		-		-		-		-		-			355,000

Issuance of shares		-		-		4,330,000		433		-		-		468,567		-			469,000

Issuance of shares as repayment of amount due to stockholders		-		-		467,626		47		-		-		70,097		-			70,144

Common stock issued for consulting services		-		-		5,277,500		528		-		-		829,101		-			829,629

Issuance of options as compensation		-		-		-		-		-		-		582,937		-			582,937

Exercise of options		-		-		125,000		12		-		-		301		-			313

Net loss		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(2,289,370	)		(2,289,370	)

Balance June 30, 2008		1,750,000	$	355,000		31,471,876	$	3,147		-	$	-	$	2,998,146	$	(3,466,962	)	$	(110,669	)

~~(A DEVELOPMENT~~The ~~STAGE~~accompanying ~~COMPANY)~~notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND JUNE 30, 2008 AND FOR THE

PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009

							July 22, 2005
	Year			Year			(inception)
	ended			ended			through
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2009			2008			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(1,423,395	)	$	(2,289,370	)	$	(4,890,357	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
Accretion of accrued royalties		100,163			31,509			131,672
Amortization of intangible asset - license		64,564			38,079			102,643
Common stock issued for consulting services		700,881			829,629			2,193,285
Issuance of stock options - employees		1,492			582,937			815,729
Amortization of beneficial conversion discount		18,438			-			37,188
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(Increase)/Decrease in:
Accounts receivable		-			6,904			-
Other receivables		-			7,000			-
Inventories		71,997			(24,315	)		(15,960	)
Other current assets		-			7,035			-
Security deposits		-			200			-
Increase/(Decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		153,858			212,939			403,420
Accrued royalties and licensing fee payable		(25,500	)		(63,000	)		(88,500	)
Deferred revenue		100,200			-			100,200
Net cash used in operating activities		(237,302	)		(660,453	)		(1,210,680	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Trademark		-			-			(325	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(325	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from private placement		-			-			126,445
Proceeds from sale of founders shares		-			-			10,000
Net proceeds from sale of stock and exercise of stock options		93,200			494,313			587,513
Proceeds from notes payable		-			-			50,000
Repayment of notes payable		-			(25,000	)		(25,000	)
Advances from officers		55,176			84,680			153,229
Advances from stockholders		23,505			100,963			198,818
Proceeds from convertible debt		60,000			-			110,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		231,881			654,956			1,211,005
NET DECREASE IN CASH		(5,421	)		(5,497	)		-
CASH, beginning of period		5,421			10,918			-
CASH, end of period	$	-		$	5,421		$	-

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

1) The Company issued 1,666,111 shares of common stock valued at $91,550 as repayment of amounts due to stockholders and officers as described in Note 6

2) The Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock valued at $7,000 as repayment of accounts payable.

3) The Company recorded a liability of $340,217 for amounts owed as a licensing fee for the license acquisition as described in Note 4

4) The Company recorded accrued royalties payable of $767,651, which represents the present value of the guaranteed minimum payments for the license acquisition as described in Note 4.

5) The Company cancelled 1,500,000 shares of common stock valued at 330,000 as a result of the modification of payment terms related to the license acquisition described in Note 4.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-6

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010

	Common stock to-be-issued						Common stock issued and outstanding				Preferred series A issued and outstanding				Additonal paid-in-capital		Deficit accumulated during the development stage			Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount

Cancellation of common stock to-be-issued		(1,500,000	)		(330,000	)		-		-		-		-		-		-			(330,000	)

Issuance of shares		(250,000	)		(25,000	)		20,849,999		2,085		-		-		113,615		-			90,700

Issuance of shares as repayment of amount due to officers		-			-			1,000,000		100		-		-		49,900		-			50,000

Issuance of shares as repayment of amount due to stockholders		-			-			666,111		67		-		-		41,483		-			41,550

Beneficial conversion of loan discount		-			-			-		-		-		-		22,500		-			22,500

Common stock issued for consulting services		-			-			38,436,000		3,843		-		-		697,038		-			700,881

Issuance of options as compensation		-			-			-		-		-		-		1,492		-			1,492

Common stock to-be-issued		500,000			2,500			-		-		-		-		-		-			2,500

Net loss		-			-			-		-		-		-		-		(1,423,395	)		(1,423,395	)

Balance June 30, 2009		500,000		$	2,500			92,423,986	$	9,242		-	$	-	$	3,924,174	$	(4,890,357	)	$	(954,441	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-7

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010

	Common stock to-be-issued						Common stock issued and outstanding				Preferred series A issued and outstanding				Additonal paid-in-capital		Deficit accumulated during the development stage			Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Issuance of shares		(500,000	)	$	(2,500	)		24,300,001	$	2,430		110	$	-	$	426,070	$	-		$	426,000

Issuance of Preferred Stock as repayment of note payable		-			-			-		-		12		-		30,000		-			30,000

Beneficial conversion of loan discount		-			-			-		-		-		-		115,551		-			115,551

Common stock issued for consulting services		-			-			31,058,333		3,106		-		-		406,470		-			409,576

Shares issued in connection with issuance of convertible debt		-			-			1,250,000		125		-		-		21,125		-			21,250

Issuance of options as compensation		-			-			-		-		-		-		1,800		-			1,800

Common stock to-be-issued		2,066,667			10,500			-		-		-		-		-		-			10,500

Net loss		-			-			-		-		-		-		-		(922,791	)		(922,791	)

Balance June 30, 2010		2,066,667		$	10,500			149,032,320	$	14,903		122	$	-	$	4,925,190	$	(5,813,148	)	$	(862,555	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-8

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND JUNE 30, 2009 AND FOR THE
PERIOD FROM JULY 22, 2005 (INCEPTION) THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010

							July 22, 2005
	Year			Year			(inception)
	ended			ended			through
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2010			2009			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(922,791	)	$	(1,423,395	)	$	(5,813,148	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
Accretion of accrued royalties and licensing fees		96,529			100,163			228,201
Gain on restructuring of troubled debt		(339,137	)		-			(339,137	)
Amortization of intangible asset - license		65,935			64,564			168,578
Common stock issued for consulting services		409,576			700,881			2,602,861
Issuance of stock options - employee		1,800			1,492			817,529
Amortization of beneficial conversion discount		23,843			18,438			61,031
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(Increase)/Decrease in:
Accounts receivable		(1,000	)		-			(1,000	)
Inventories		(62,763	)		71,997			(78,723	)
Security deposit		(6,000	)		-			(6,000	)
Increase/(Decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		17,597			153,858			421,017
Accrued royalties and licensing fee payable		(28,000	)		(25,500	)		(116,500	)
Deferred revenue		87,700			100,200			187,900

Net cash used in operating activities		(656,711	)		(237,302	)		(1,867,391	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Trademark		-			-			(325	)

Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(325	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from private placement		-			-			126,445
Proceeds from sale of founders shares		-			-			10,000
Net proceeds from sale of stock and exercise of stock options		436,500			93,200			1,024,013
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable		120,000			-			170,000
Repayment of notes payable		-			-			(25,000	)
(Repayments)/advances from officers		(14,721	)		55,176			138,508
Advances from stockholders		17,672			23,505			216,490
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt		155,000			60,000			265,000
Repayment of convertible debt		(12,000	)		-			(12,000	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		702,451			231,881			1,913,456

NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH		45,740			(5,421	)		45,740
CASH, beginning of period		-			5,421			-

CASH, end of period	$	45,740		$	-		$	45,740

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

1)The Company recorded a liability of $340,217 for amounts owed for the license acquisition as described in Note 5 during the year ended June 30, 2009

2)The Company recorded accrued royalties of $821,240, which represents the present value of the guaranteed minimum payments for the license acquisition as described in Note 5 during the year ended June 30,2009.

3)The Company issued 1,666,111 shares of common stock valued at $91,550 as repayment of amounts due to stockholders and officers as described in Note 6 during the year ended June 30, 2009.

4)The Company cancelled 1,500,000 shares of common stock valued at $330,000 as a result of the modifications of payment terms related to the license acquisition described in Note 5 during the year ended June 30, 2009.

5)The Company refinanced its November 18, 2008 convertible debt totaling $10,000 with $1,200 of accrued interest there on with the issuance of a new convertible debt dated November 4, 2009 (Note 8).

6)The Company refinanced various convertible debt totaling $95,000 with $2,500 of accrued interest there on with the issuance of a new convertible debt dated June 25, 2010(Note 8).

7) The Company recorded a debt discount of $3,500 for the 250,000 shares of common stock issued as part of the note payable dated March 11, 2010.

8) The Company recorded a debt discount of $4,500 for the 250,000 shares of common stock issued as part of the note payable dated May 3, 2010.

9) The Company recorded a debt discount of $4,500 for the 250,000 shares of common stock issued as part of the note payable dated May 5, 2010.

10) the Company recorded a debt discount of $43,333 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company recorded a debt discount of $4,500 for the 250,000 shares of common stock issued as part of the convertible note payable dated June 17, 2010.

11) he Company recorded a debt discount of $25,278 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company recorded a debt discount of $4,500 for the 250,000 shares of common stock issued as part of the convertible note payable dated June 17, 2010.

12) The Company recorded a debt discount of $7,906 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company also recorded a debt discount of $1,261 related to the 100,000 options issued as part of the convertible note payable dated November 4, 2009.

13) The Company recorded a debt discount of $972 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company also recorded a debt discount of $148 related to the 16,666 options issued as part of the convertible note payable dated April 1, 2010.

14) The Company recorded a debt discount of $1,250 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company also recorded a debt discount of $1235 related to the 16,666 options issued as part of the convertible note payable dated April 29, 2010..

15) The Company recorded a debt discount of $1,288 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company also recorded a debt discount of $1259 related to the 16,666 options issued as part of the convertible note payable dated April 30, 2010..

16) The Company recorded a debt discount of $5,882 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company also recorded a debt discount of $15,334 related to the 3,333,333 options issued as part of the convertible note payable dated May, 10, 2010..

17) The Company recorded a debt discount of $2,941 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company also recorded a debt discount of $14,820 related to the 3,333,333 options issued as part of the convertible note payable dated May, 10, 2010..

16) The Company recorded a debt discount of $6,957 representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features plus the Company also recorded a debt discount of $11,261 related to the 3,333,333 options issued as part of the convertible note payable dated May, 14, 2010..

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-9

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS

NATURE OF OPERATIONS

WaterPure International, Inc. (a development stage company) (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Florida on July 22, 2005, for the purpose of marketing selected private label products and services to the small office and/or home office as well as the consumer markets. The Company ~~intends~~is ~~to market~~marketing and ~~eventually~~manufacturing ~~to manufacture~~ the licensed Atmospheric Water Generators from Everest Water Ltd, devices that harvest pure drinking water from ambient air. These machines are engineered to produce drinking water virtually free of any material, bacterial, organic or other contaminants. The Company also intends to market mineral additives that will permit addition of organic minerals, flavors and other desired additives to water produced by the machine. The Atmospheric Water Generators will bear ~~its~~their own exclusive WaterPure branding.

NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN/MANAGEMENT’S PLAN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred a net loss since its inception totaling $45,~~890~~813,~~357~~148, has earned minimal revenues and has a working capital deficiency as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

In order to generate revenues and the working capital needed to continue and expand operations, the Company’s management has committed to a plan for increasing retail distribution channels for its products and raising additional capital. There can be no assurances, however, that the Company will be able to obtain the necessary funding to finance their operations or grow revenue in sufficient amounts to fund their operations.

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~DEVELOPMENT STAGE~~Development ~~COMPANY~~Stage Company

The Company is considered a development stage company as ~~defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 7, as~~ it has no principal operations and~~/or~~ minimal ~~revenues from any source~~revenue. Operations from the Company’s inception through June 30, ~~2009~~2010 were devoted primarily to strategic planning, raising capital and developing revenue-generating opportunities.

~~USE OF~~Use ~~ESTIMATES~~of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS~~Codification

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), launched the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB. The ~~Company~~ ~~considers~~ASC ~~financial~~reorganizes ~~instruments~~various ~~with~~U.S. GAAP pronouncements into accounting topics and displays them using a ~~maturity~~consistent ~~date~~structure. All existing accounting standards documents are superseded as described in Statement of ~~three~~Financial ~~months~~Accounting ~~or less~~Standard ~~from~~(“SFAS”) No. 168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the ~~date~~Hierarchy of ~~purchase~~Generally toAccepted beAccounting ~~cash~~Principles." ~~equivalents~~All of the contents of the ASC carry the same level of authority, effectively superseding SFAS No. 162, The ~~Company~~Hierarchy ~~had~~of noGenerally ~~cash equivalents~~Accepted atAccounting ~~June~~Principles, 30which identified and ranked the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Also included in the ASC are rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, under authority of federal securities laws that are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The adoption of the ASC as of July 1, 2009 ~~and~~had ~~2008~~no impact on our consolidated financial statements other than changing the way specific accounting standards are referenced in the Company’s financial statements.

~~ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE~~F-10

The Company makes judgments about the collectability of accounts receivable to be able to present them at their net realizable value on the balance sheet. Such judgments require careful analysis of the aging of customer accounts, consideration of why accounts have not been paid, and review of historical bad debt issues. From this analysis, the Company determines an estimated allowance for receivables that will ultimately become uncollectible. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had an allowance for bad debts of $22,759 and $2,762, respectively.

F-7

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

~~INVENTORIES~~Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company ~~states~~considers ~~inventories~~financial atinstruments ~~the~~with ~~lower~~a ofmaturity ~~cost~~date ~~or market. As~~ of ~~June~~three ~~30, 2009~~months ~~and~~or ~~2008,~~less ~~inventories~~from ~~consisted~~the ofdate ~~purchased finished goods plus directly attributable acquisition costs. Cost~~ of ~~inventory~~purchase isto ~~determined~~be ~~using~~cash ~~the weighted average cost method~~equivalents. The Company ~~assesses~~had ~~the~~no ~~need~~cash toequivalents ~~establish inventory~~at ~~reserves~~June ~~for excess~~30, ~~obsolete~~2010 ~~or slow-moving inventory based on changes in customer demand, technology developments~~ and ~~other factors~~2009.

~~LONG-LIVED ASSETS~~Accounts ~~AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS~~Receivable

The Company ~~accounts~~makes ~~for~~judgments ~~its~~about ~~long-lived~~the ~~assets~~collectability ~~in accordance with Statement~~ of ~~Financial~~ ~~Accounting~~accounts ~~Standards~~receivable ~~(“SFAS”)~~to ~~No.~~be ~~142,~~able ~~“Goodwill~~to ~~and~~present ~~Other~~them ~~Intangible Assets”,~~at ~~which~~their ~~requires~~net ~~that~~realizable ~~intangible~~value ~~assets~~on ~~with~~the ~~finite~~balance ~~lives~~sheet. Such bejudgments ~~amortized over~~require ~~their~~careful ~~respective~~analysis ~~estimated~~of ~~lives~~the ~~and~~aging ~~No.~~of ~~144~~customer accounts, ~~“Accounting~~consideration ~~for the Impairment~~ of ~~Long-lived~~ ~~Assets~~why ~~and~~accounts ~~for~~have ~~Long-lived~~not ~~Assets~~been topaid, beand ~~Disposed~~review of,” ~~which requires~~historical ~~that~~bad ~~long-lived~~debt ~~assets~~issues. From ~~and~~this ~~certain~~analysis, ~~intangible~~the ~~assets~~Company bedetermines ~~reviewed~~an ~~for impairment~~estimated ~~whenever~~allowance ~~events~~for orreceivables ~~changes in circumstances indicate~~ that ~~the carrying~~will ~~amount~~ultimately ~~may~~become ~~not be recoverable~~uncollectible. IfAs ~~undiscounted~~of ~~expected~~June ~~future cash~~30, ~~flows~~2010 ~~are~~and ~~less~~2009, ~~than~~ the ~~carrying~~Company ~~value~~had ~~of the assets,~~ an ~~impairment~~allowance ~~loss~~for ~~is to~~bad bedebts ~~recognized~~of ~~based~~$0 onand ~~the~~$22,759, ~~fair value of the assets~~respectively.

~~CONVERTIBLE DEBT~~Inventories

The Company ~~accounts~~states ~~for~~inventories ~~its~~at ~~convertible~~the ~~debt~~lower inof ~~accordance~~cost ~~with~~or ~~the~~market. As ~~provisions~~ of ~~Emerging~~ ~~Issues~~June ~~Task~~30, ~~Force~~2010 ~~Issue~~and ~~(“EITF”)~~2009, ~~98-5~~inventories ~~“Accounting~~consisted ~~for~~of ~~Convertible Securities~~purchased ~~with~~finished ~~Beneficial Conversion Features~~goods,” ~~(“EITF~~raw ~~98-5”)~~materials and ~~EITF 00-27~~work ~~“Application~~in ofprocess ~~EITF 98-5~~plus todirectly ~~Certain~~attributable ~~Convertible~~acquisition ~~Instruments,”~~costs. Cost ~~which~~of ~~require~~inventory ~~the~~is ~~embedded beneficial~~determined ~~conversion~~using ~~features~~the ~~present~~weighted inaverage ~~convertible~~cost ~~securities~~method. The beCompany ~~valued separately~~assesses atthe ~~issuance~~need ~~and~~to ~~should~~establish beinventory ~~recognized~~reserves ~~and~~for ~~measured~~excess, byobsolete ~~allocating~~or ~~a portion~~slow-moving ofinventory ~~the~~based ~~proceeds~~on ~~equal~~changes toin ~~the~~customer ~~intrinsic~~demand, ~~value~~technology ofdevelopments ~~that~~and ~~feature~~other ~~to additional paid-in capital~~factors.

~~REVENUE RECOGNITION~~Long-Lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets

The Company ~~recognizes~~accounts ~~revenue~~for inits ~~accordance~~long-lived ~~with~~assets ~~Securities~~by ~~and~~requiring ~~Exchange~~that ~~Commission (“SEC”)~~intangible ~~Staff~~assets ~~Accounting~~with ~~Bulletin~~finite ~~(“SAB”)~~lives ~~No.~~amortized ~~104,~~over ~~“Revenue~~their ~~Recognition,”~~respective ~~which outlines~~estimated ~~the~~lives ~~four~~and ~~basic~~requiring ~~criteria~~ that ~~must~~long-lived beassets ~~met~~and ~~before~~certain ~~revenue~~intangible ~~can~~assets be ~~recognized:~~ ~~(1)~~reviewed ~~persuasive~~for ~~evidence~~impairment ofwhenever anevents ~~arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred~~ or ~~services~~changes ~~have~~in ~~been~~circumstances ~~rendered;~~indicate ~~(3)~~that the ~~fee~~carrying isamount ~~fixed~~may ornot ~~determinable; and~~be ~~(4) collectibility is reasonably assured~~recoverable. ~~Determination~~If ofundiscounted ~~criteria (3)~~expected ~~and~~future ~~(4)~~cash flows are ~~based~~less onthan ~~management’s judgments regarding~~ the ~~fixed~~carrying ~~nature~~value of the ~~fee~~assets, ~~charged~~an ~~for~~impairment ~~services~~loss ~~rendered~~is ~~and~~to ~~products~~be ~~delivered~~recognized ~~and~~based on the ~~collectibility~~ fair value of ~~those~~the ~~fees~~assets.

~~DEFERRED REVENUE~~Deposits

The Company ~~has~~recognizes ~~entered~~deposits ~~into~~as aliabilities ~~number~~when ofamounts ~~Master~~are ~~Distributorship~~received ~~Agreements~~in ~~with third-parties~~advance ~~where~~of byformal ~~the third-party will market and sell WaterPure branded machines to customers and resellers~~agreements. ~~The~~These ~~distributors~~amounts ~~have~~are ~~entered~~classified ~~into~~as ~~a purchase~~current ~~commitment~~or ~~for 2,050 units and have deposited $101,800, which the Company will apply in $50 increments towards each WaterPure atmospheric water machine sold and delivered within twenty~~non-~~four~~current ~~month~~pursuant ofto the ~~execution of the agreement. The~~ Company’s ~~has~~expectation ~~recorded the deposit~~ as ~~deferred~~to ~~revenue, and recognizes~~ the ~~revenue~~future asuse ~~each~~of ~~machine~~such ~~is sold~~funds.

~~SHIPPING &~~Convertible ~~HANDLING COSTS~~Debt

~~Outbound shipping~~The ~~and~~Company ~~handling~~accounts ~~costs~~for ~~are~~its ~~included~~convertible debt in ~~cost~~accordance ofby ~~goods~~requiring ~~sold~~that the embedded beneficial conversion features present in ~~the accompanying~~convertible ~~statements~~securities ofbe ~~income.~~valued ~~These~~separately ~~cost~~at ~~were~~issuance ~~$5,740~~and recognized and ~~$21,602~~measured ~~for~~by allocating a portion of the ~~years~~ ~~ended~~proceeds ~~June~~equal ~~30,~~to ~~2009~~the ~~and~~intrinsic ~~2008,~~value ~~respectively~~of that feature to additional paid-in capital.

FThe Company accounts for its convertible debt issued with stock options by requiring that the proceeds be allocated based on their relative fair values and recognizing the portion attributable to the stock options in additional paid-8in capital.

F-11

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

~~INCOME TAXES~~Deferred Revenue

The Company ~~recognizes~~has ~~deferred~~entered ~~tax~~into six ~~liabilities~~separate ~~and~~Master ~~assets~~Distributorship ~~for~~Agreements ~~the~~with ~~expected~~third-parties ~~future tax~~whereby ~~consequences~~the ofthird-parties ~~events~~will ~~that~~market ~~have~~and ~~been~~sell ~~included~~WaterPure inbranded ~~the~~machines ~~financial~~to ~~statements or~~customers ~~tax~~and ~~returns~~resellers. ~~Deferred~~These ~~tax~~third-parties ~~liabilities~~have entered into purchase commitments for 3,722 units and ~~assets~~have ~~are~~remitted ~~determined~~deposits ~~based~~totaling on$186,100, ~~the differences~~as ~~between~~of June 30, 2010 which the ~~financial~~Company ~~statement~~has ~~and~~recorded ~~tax~~as ~~bases~~deferred ofrevenue. ~~assets~~The ~~and liabilities~~Company ~~using~~will ~~enacted~~record ~~tax~~the ~~rates~~deposits as revenue in ~~effect~~$50 increments for ~~the~~each ~~year~~WaterPure inatmospheric ~~which~~water ~~the differences~~machine ~~are~~sold ~~expected~~and todelivered ~~reverse.~~within ~~Differences~~twenty-four ~~between~~months of the ~~financial~~execution ~~statement and~~of ~~tax~~the ~~bases~~agreement. ofThe ~~assets,~~Company ~~liabilities,~~sold ~~and~~6 ~~other~~of ~~transactions~~these ~~did~~machines ~~not~~and ~~result~~recognized $300 in ~~a provision~~revenue for ~~current~~the oryear ~~deferred~~ended ~~income~~June ~~taxes~~30, ~~for~~2010 ~~the~~and ~~periods~~sold ~~from~~24 ~~July~~units 22and recognized $1, ~~2005~~200 ~~(inception)~~in ~~through~~revenue for the year ended June 30, 2009.

~~CONCENTRATIONS OF~~Revenue ~~CREDIT RISK~~Recognition

The Company’s ~~financial~~recognizes ~~instruments~~revenue ~~that~~based ~~are~~on ~~exposed~~four tobasic acriteria ~~concentration~~that ofmust ~~credit risk~~be ~~are~~met ~~cash~~before ~~and~~revenue ~~accounts~~can ~~receivable.~~be ~~The~~recognized: ~~Company~~(1) ~~places~~persuasive ~~its~~evidence ~~cash~~of ~~with~~an aarrangement ~~high credit~~exists; ~~quality~~(2) ~~institution.~~delivery Athas ~~June~~occurred ~~30,~~or ~~2009,~~services have been rendered; (3) the ~~Company’s~~fee ~~cash~~is ~~balance~~fixed ~~on deposit~~or ~~did~~determinable; ~~not~~and ~~exceed~~(4) ~~federal~~collectibility ~~depository~~is ~~insurance~~reasonably ~~limits~~assured. Determination ~~The~~of ~~Company routinely~~criteria ~~assesses~~(3) ~~the~~and ~~financial~~(4) ~~strengths~~are ofbased ~~its~~on ~~customers~~management’s ~~and,~~judgments asregarding athe ~~result, believes~~fixed ~~that~~nature ~~their~~of ~~accounts~~the ~~receivable,~~fee ~~net~~charged offor ~~reserves,~~services ~~credit~~rendered ~~risk~~and ~~exposure is~~products ~~limited~~delivered and the collectibility of those fees.

~~FAIR VALUE~~Shipping OF& ~~FINANCIAL~~Handling ~~INSTRUMENTS~~Costs

~~The Company~~Outbound ~~has~~shipping ~~partially implemented SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” for financial assets~~ and ~~financial~~handling ~~liabilities.~~costs ~~SFAS~~are ~~No.~~included ~~157~~in ~~defines~~cost ~~fair~~of ~~value, establishes~~goods asold ~~framework~~in ~~for~~the ~~measuring~~accompanying ~~fair~~statements ~~value,~~of ~~expands~~operations. ~~disclosure~~These ~~about~~costs ~~fair value~~were ~~measurements~~$564 and is$5,740 ~~effective~~ for ~~fiscal~~the years ~~beginning~~ended ~~after~~June ~~November 15~~30, ~~2007,~~2010 ~~except as it relates to nonrecurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets~~ and liabilities. This standard only applies when other standards require or permit the fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities. It does not increase the use of fair value measurement. The Company has determined that none of its financial assets or liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis2009, ~~therefore the disclosures by SFAS No~~respectively. ~~157 do not currently apply.~~

~~NET LOSS~~Income ~~PER COMMON SHARE~~Taxes

The Company ~~presents~~recognizes ~~“basic”~~deferred ~~earnings~~tax ~~(loss)~~liabilities ~~per~~and ~~share~~assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax liabilities and, ifassets ~~applicable,~~are ~~“diluted” earnings~~determined ~~per~~based ~~share~~on ~~pursuant~~the todifferences between the ~~provisions~~financial statement and tax bases of ~~SFAS~~assets ~~No.~~and ~~128,~~liabilities ~~Earnings~~using ~~per~~enacted ~~Share.~~tax ~~Basic earnings~~rates ~~(loss)~~in ~~per~~effect ~~share~~for the year in which the differences are ~~calculated~~expected byto ~~dividing~~reverse. ~~net~~Differences ~~income~~between the financial statement and tax basis of assets, liabilities, and other transactions did not result in a provision for current or ~~loss~~deferred byincome taxes for the ~~weighted~~ ~~average~~periods ~~number~~from ofJuly ~~common~~22, ~~shares~~2005 ~~outstanding~~(inception) ~~during~~through ~~each period~~June 30, 2010.

~~STOCK BASED~~The ~~COMPENSATION~~Company has a valuation allowance against the full amount of its net deferred tax assets. The Company currently provides a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of its deferred tax assets, will not be realized.

~~The Company~~Concentrations accounts for equity instruments exchanged for services in accordance with FAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” and EITF 96-18 “Accounting for Equity Investments That are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services.” Under the provisions of ~~FAS~~Credit No. 123(R), share-based compensation issued to employees is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the grant). Share-based compensation issued to non-employees is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily measurable, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periodRisk

~~F-9~~The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to a concentration of credit risk are cash and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash with a high credit quality institution. At June 30, 2010, the Company’s cash balance on deposit did not exceed federal depository insurance limits. The Company routinely assesses the financial strengths of its customers and, as a result, believes that their accounts receivable, net of reserves, credit risk exposure is limited.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820 applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances. The FASB has partially delayed the effective date for one year for certain fair value measurements when those measurements are used for financial statement items that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

F-12

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

~~RECENT ACCOUNTING~~FASB ~~PRONOUNCEMENTS~~ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, FASB ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

InLevel ~~May 2009,~~1 ~~the~~inputs ~~FASB~~utilize ~~issued~~quoted ~~SFAS~~prices ~~165, "Subsequent Events"~~ (~~"SFAS 165"~~unadjusted)~~, which establishes~~ ~~general standards~~in ~~for~~active ~~accounting~~markets for ~~and~~identical ~~disclosure of~~assets ~~events~~or liabilities that ~~occur~~the ~~after~~Company has the ~~balance~~ability ~~sheet~~to ~~date~~access. ~~but~~Level ~~before financial statement~~2 inputs are ~~issued~~inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or ~~available~~liability, toeither bedirectly ~~issued~~or indirectly. ~~In particular~~Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, ~~SFAS~~ ~~165~~as ~~sets~~well ~~forth~~as ~~the~~inputs ~~period~~that ~~after~~are observable for the ~~balance~~asset ~~sheet~~or ~~date during~~liability ~~which~~(other ~~management~~than ofquoted aprices), ~~reporting~~such ~~entity~~as ~~should~~interest ~~evaluate~~rates, ~~events~~foreign ~~or transactions~~exchange rates, and yield curves that ~~may~~are ~~occur~~observable ~~for~~at ~~potential~~commonly ~~recognition~~quoted orintervals. ~~disclosure~~Level in3 ~~the financial~~inputs ~~statements;~~are unobservable inputs for the ~~circumstances~~asset ~~under~~or liability, which is typically based on an entity’s ~~should recognize events~~own orassumptions, ~~transactions occurring~~as ~~after~~there ~~the~~is ~~balance~~little, ~~sheet date~~if inany, ~~its~~related ~~financial statements' and the disclosures that~~market anactivity. ~~entity should make~~In ~~about~~instances ~~events or transactions~~where ~~that occurred after~~ the ~~balance sheet date. It~~ determination of the fair value measurement is ~~effective~~based ~~for interim~~on ~~and~~inputs ~~annual~~from ~~periods~~different ~~ending~~levels ~~after~~of ~~June~~the 15fair value hierarchy, ~~2009. The~~the ~~adoption of~~level ~~SFAS~~in ~~165~~the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on ~~June~~the ~~30,~~lowest ~~2009~~level ~~required~~input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s toassessment ~~disclose~~of the ~~date~~significance ~~through which~~of ~~they~~a ~~have~~particular ~~evaluated~~input ~~subsequent~~to ~~events~~the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and ~~whether~~considers ~~that~~factors ~~date~~specific isto the ~~date the~~asset ~~financials~~or ~~were issued~~liability.

~~NOTE 4~~Earnings –(Loss) ~~INTANGIBLE~~per ~~ASSETS~~Common ~~- LICENSE~~Share

~~On December~~The 7,Company ~~2007,~~presents ~~the~~basic ~~Company~~earnings ~~entered~~(loss) ~~into~~per ~~licensing~~share ~~agreements~~and, ~~with~~if ~~Everest Water~~applicable, ~~LTD~~diluted ~~for~~earnings ~~the~~per ~~manufacturing~~share. ~~and~~Basic ~~marketing~~earnings ~~rights~~(loss) toper ~~atmospheric~~share ~~water generators~~are ~~and~~calculated ~~mineral~~by ~~additive~~dividing ~~units.~~net ~~The~~income ~~Company~~or ~~agreed~~loss toby ~~pay~~the ~~$300,000,~~weighted ~~plus 1,500,000~~average ~~shares~~number of ~~the Company’s~~ common ~~stock~~shares ~~valued~~outstanding atduring ~~$330,000~~each ~~as consideration under this agreement~~period. The ~~Company~~effect ~~paid~~of ~~$50,000~~computing ~~with~~ the ~~execution of~~diluted ~~the~~income ~~agreement~~(loss) ~~and~~per anshare ~~additional~~is ~~$10,000~~antidilutive inand ~~March~~as ~~2008. On August 1~~such, ~~2008~~basic ~~the Company~~ and ~~Everest~~diluted ~~Water~~(loss) ~~LTD~~per ~~modified~~share ~~their~~are ~~licensing~~the ~~agreement.~~same ~~Under~~for the ~~modified~~ ~~agreement,~~years ~~the~~ended ~~Company~~June ~~owes Everest $430~~30,~~000~~ to2010 ~~be paid over 33 months starting September 1, 2008,~~ and 8%2009 ~~royalty~~as ~~payments~~well ~~with guarantee minimum payments~~ as ~~follows:~~the ~~$50,000~~cumulative ~~year~~period ~~one,~~from ~~$60,000~~July ~~year two~~22, ~~$70,000~~2005(inception) ~~year~~through ~~three, $90,000~~June ~~year four and $100~~30,~~000~~ ~~each year thereafter~~2010.

~~The following~~Share ~~table~~Based ~~summarizes~~Compensation ~~the various components of the Everest license as of June 30, 2009~~ and ~~2008:~~Payments

	2009		2008
Cost of license described above	$	1,094,864	$	1,094,864
Less: accumulated amortization		102,643		38,079
License, net	$	992,221	$	1,056,785

Share-based compensation issued to employees is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the grant). Share-based compensation issued to non-employees is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more readily measurable, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period

~~The~~Recent ~~total amortization~~Accounting ~~expense for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $64,564 and $38,079, respectively.~~Pronouncements

~~Contingencies -~~There ~~Royalties~~are no recent accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material impact on the Company.

~~Pursuant to~~NOTE ~~the~~4 ~~licensing~~- agreement as described above, the Company will pay Everest Water LTD an 8% royalty payment with a guarantee minimum payment. The Company has recognized a liability of $785,053, which represents the present value of the minimum royalty payments using the effective discount rate.INVENTORIES

~~The Company~~Inventories, ~~has~~consists ~~accounted for the modifications~~ of ~~the~~raw ~~licensing~~materials, ~~agreement~~work asin ~~a troubled~~progress ~~debt~~and ~~restructuring~~finished goods, ~~and~~is ~~has~~valued ~~reflected~~at the ~~net~~lower ~~carrying amount~~ of ~~the modified~~cost ~~debt~~net ~~consistent~~realizable ~~with~~value ~~the~~using ~~carrying amount of~~ the ~~original~~weighted ~~troubled debt~~average method.

NOTE 5 – NOTES PAYABLE

	June 30, 2010		June 30, 2009
Raw materials	$	5,784	$	15,960
Work-in-progress		72,939		-0-
Finished goods		-0-		-0-
Inventory	$	78,723	$	15,960

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on May 21, 2007 for the issuance of two $25,000 notes for a total of $50,000. The notes payable accrue interest at 12% per annum and were due six months from the date of the note. On November 15, 2007, the terms of these notes were extended for an additional six months.F-13

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company repaid one of the $25,000 notes. The other note is currently in default.

F-10

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6 5 – ~~ADVANCES~~INTANGIBLE ~~FROM~~ASSETS ~~OFFICERS~~- ~~AND STOCKHOLDERS~~LICENSE

~~Officers and~~On ~~stockholders~~December of7, 2007, the Company ~~have~~entered ~~provided~~into ~~various~~licensing ~~short-term~~agreements ~~working~~with ~~capital advances.~~Everest ~~During~~Water ~~the~~LTD ~~year~~for ~~ended~~the ~~June~~manufacturing ~~30, 2009, short-term working capital advances from officers~~ and ~~stockholders~~marketing ~~under~~rights ~~these~~to ~~borrowing~~atmospheric ~~arrangements totaled~~water ~~$55,176~~generators and ~~$23,505~~mineral ~~respectively~~additive units. ~~During~~The ~~the~~Company ~~year~~agreed ~~ended~~to ~~June~~pay ~~30, 2008, short-term working capital advances from officers and stockholders under this borrowing arrangement totaled~~ $84300,~~680 and $100~~000,~~963~~ ~~respectively. The Company~~plus ~~issued~~ 1,~~000~~500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock asvalued ~~repayment~~at ~~for~~ $50330,000 ofas ~~the amount~~consideration ~~due~~under tothis ~~officers~~agreement. ~~and~~The ~~666,111~~Company ~~shares~~paid of$50,000 ~~common~~with ~~stock~~the asexecution ~~repayment for $41,550~~ of the ~~amount~~agreement ~~due~~and ~~stockholders~~an onadditional ~~March 21~~$20,000 ~~2008.~~through ~~The~~July ~~Company~~31, ~~does not intend to pay interest on the principal borrowed from officers and stockholders~~2008.

~~The following~~On ~~table~~August ~~summarizes~~1, 2008, the Company’s ~~debt~~and toEverest ~~officers~~Water ~~and~~LTD ~~stockholders~~modified asthe payment terms of ~~June~~ 30their licensing agreement, ~~2009~~because the cash payment obligation under the original agreement could not be met by the Company. Under the amended payment terms, the Company cancelled the shares to be issued to Everest and agreed to pay Everest $430,000 over 33 months starting September 1, 2008, plus annual 8% royalty payment with guaranteed minimum payments as follows: $50,000 in year one, $60,000 in year two, $70,000 in year three, $90,000 in year four and $100,000 each year after until the termination of the licensing agreement, which coincides with the expiration of the last patent in August 2027. The Company has accounted for this modification as a troubled debt restructuring. There was no impact on earnings per share.

	2009		2008
Advances from officers	$	103,229	$	98,053
Advances from stockholders	$	87,124	$	105,169

On March 30, 2010, the Company and Everest Water LTD modified the payment terms of their licensing agreement, because the cash payment obligation under the original agreement, as amended, could not be met by the Company. Under the amended payment terms, the Company cancelled the shares to be issued to Everest and agreed to pay Everest the balance owed Everest of $392,000 over 33 months starting April 1, 2010, plus an annual 5% royalty payment with guaranteed minimum payments as follows: $30,000 in year one, $40,000 in year two, $50,000 in year three, $75,000 in year four and $100,000 each year after until the termination of the licensing agreement, which coincides with the expiration of the last patent in August 2027. The Company has accounted for this modification as a troubled debt restructuring and recognized a gain for the excess of the net carrying amount of the trouble debt over the modified debt. The gain had an impact on earnings per share of $.003.

~~NOTE 7~~The –following ~~CONVERTIBLE~~table ~~DEBT~~summarizes the various components of the Everest license as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009:

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on May 21, 2007 for the issuance of an aggregate of $50,000 of convertible notes (“Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due two years from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.25. In accordance with EITF 98-5, during the year ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded a debt discount of $18,750 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company determined the intrinsic value based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the commitment date. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

	March 31,		June 30,
	2010		2009
Cost of license described above	$	1,094,864	$	1,094,864
Less: accumulated amortization		168,578		102,643
License, net	$	926,286	$	992,221

~~The~~Amortization ~~Company~~expense ~~entered into another Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on July 30, 2008~~ for the ~~issuance~~ ofyears an aggregate of $50,000 of convertible notes. The convertible notes accrue interest at 8% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holders have the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a 30% discount to the average five day stock price prior to conversion. In accordance with EITF 98-5, during the year ended June 30, ~~2009,~~2010 ~~the~~and ~~Company~~2009 ~~recorded~~amounted ato ~~debt discount of~~ $1565,~~000~~935 onand ~~the debt~~$64,564, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debtrespectively. ~~The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.~~

~~The Company~~Contingency entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on November 18, 2008 for the issuance of an aggregate of $10,000 of convertible notes. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.005 per share. In accordance with EITF 98-5, during the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a debt discount of $7,500 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.Royalties

~~F-11~~Pursuant to the licensing agreement described above, the Company will pay Everest Water LTD a 5% royalty payment on the sale of each AWG with a guaranteed minimum payment. The Company has recognized a liability of $550,154, as of June 30, 2010, which represents the present value of the minimum royalty payments using the effective discount rate.

F-14

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8 -6 ~~STOCKHOLDERS’~~– ~~EQUITY~~NOTES PAYABLE

The Company ~~had~~has ~~250,000,000~~a ~~and~~note ~~100,000,000~~payable ~~shares~~with ofan ~~$.0001~~accredited ~~par~~investor ~~value~~for ~~common~~$25,000 ~~stock authorized~~which accrues interest at ~~June~~12% ~~30,~~per ~~2009~~annum and ~~2008,~~was ~~respectively.~~originally Ofdue ~~the~~November ~~authorized shares~~21, ~~20,150,000~~ ~~shares~~2007. On ofNovember ~~common~~15, ~~stock~~2007, ~~have been issued to~~ the ~~founders~~terms of the ~~Company~~ ~~(“founder’s~~note ~~shares”).~~were ~~The~~extended ~~Company~~for ~~received~~an ~~$10,000~~additional insix ~~cash~~months. ~~and~~The ~~$40,375 in~~note ~~services~~is currently in ~~consideration of the founder shares~~default.

The Company on March 11, 2010, issued 250,00 shares of common stock and a $25,000 note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and was due April 12, 2010. On April 12, 2010 the terms of the note plus accrued interest of $375 were extended to June 17, 2010. On June 17, 2010 these notes plus accrued interest of $761 were converted into a convertible debenture (Note 8). The Company also recorded a debt discount of $3,500 related to the relative fair value of the 250,000 shares of Common Stock in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

The Company on March 30, 2010, issued a $30,000 note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 6% per annum and is due March 30, 2011. This note was converted into 12 shares of preferred stock on June 18, 2010 (Note 9).

The Company on April 26, 2010, issued a $15,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand.

The Company on May 3, 2010, issued 250,000 shares of common stock and a $25,000 note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and was due June 3, 2010. On June 17, 2010 the terms of the note plus accrued interest of $682 were converted into a convertible debenture (Note8). The Company also recorded a debt discount of $4,500 related to the relative fair value of the 250,000 shares of Common Stock in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

The Company on May 5, 2010, issued 250,000 shares of common stock and a $25,000 note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and was due June 3, 2010. On June 17, 2010 the terms of the note plus accrued interest of $682 were converted into a convertible debenture (Note8). The Company also recorded a debt discount of $4,500 related to the relative fair value of the 250,000 shares of Common Stock in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

NOTE 7 – ADVANCES FROM OFFICERS AND SHAREHOLDERS

On May 15, 2009, the Company has a note payable with a shareholder which accrues interest at 8% per annum and was originally due August 15, 2009. The note is currently in default.

Officers and stockholders of the Company have provided various short-term working capital advances. During the year ended June 30, 2010, repayments to officers totaled $14,721 and advances from stockholders totaled $17,672 under there borrowing arrangements. During the year ended June 30, 2009, short-term working capital advances from officers and stockholders under there borrowing arrangements totaled $55,176 and $23,505, respectively. The Company does not intend to pay interest on the amounts borrowed from officers and stockholders and the advances are intended to be short-term.

F-15

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE DEBT

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on May 21, 2007 for the issuance of an aggregate of $50,000 of convertible notes. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due two years from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.25 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded a debt discount of $18,750 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement. The note is currently in default.

The Company entered into another Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on July 30, 2008 for the issuance of an aggregate of $50,000 of convertible notes. The convertible notes accrue interest at 8% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holders have the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a 30% discount to the average five day stock price prior to conversion. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a debt discount of $15,000 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement. The note is currently in default.

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on November 18, 2008 for the issuance of an aggregate of $10,000 of convertible notes. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and were due one year from the date of the note. The note holder had the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.005 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a debt discount of $7,500 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement. The Company refinanced its November 18, 2008 convertible debt and accrued interest ($1,200) thereon by entering into a new Securities Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor on November 4, 2009 for the issuance of an aggregate of $11,200 of convertible notes together with 100,000 options to purchase common stock. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.005 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $7,906 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $1,261 related to the relative fair value of the 100,000 options in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on April 1, 2010 for the issuance of an aggregate of $1,667 of convertible notes together with 16,666 options to purchase common stock. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.005 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $972 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $148 related to the relative fair value of the 16,666 options in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

F-16

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE DEBT (continued)

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on April 29, 2010 for the issuance of an aggregate of $1,667 of convertible notes together with 16,666 options to purchase common stock. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.005 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $1,250 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $235 related to the relative fair value of the 16,666 options in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on April 30, 2010 for the issuance of an aggregate of $1,667 of convertible notes together with 16,666 options to purchase common stock. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.005 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $1,288 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $259 related to the relative fair value of the 16,666 options in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on May 10, 2010 for the issuance of an aggregate of $50,000 of convertible notes together with 3,333,333 options to purchase common stock. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.015 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $5,882 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $5,334 related to the relative fair value of the 3,333,333 options in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on May 10, 2010 for the issuance of an aggregate of $25,000 of convertible notes together with 3,333,333 options to purchase common stock. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.015 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $2,941 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $4,820 related to the relative fair value of the 3,333,333 options in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on May 14, 2010 for the issuance of an aggregate of $20,000 of convertible notes together with 3,333,333 options to purchase common stock. The convertible notes accrue interest at 12% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.015 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $6,957 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $1,261 related to the relative fair value of the 3,333,333 options in accordance with ASC 470-20. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement.

F-17

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8 – CONVERTIBLE DEBT(continued)

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on June 17, 2010 for the issuance of an aggregate of $97,500 of convertible notes. The convertible notes accrue interest at 18% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.01 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $43,333 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $4,500.00 related to the relative fair value of the 250,000 shares of Common Stock in accordance with ASC 470-20.

The Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors on June 17, 2010 for the issuance of an aggregate of $35,000 of convertible notes. The convertible notes accrue interest at 18% per annum and are due one year from the date of the note. The note holder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal to the Company’s common stock at a rate of $0.005 per share. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded a debt discount of $25,278 on the debt, representing the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion features based upon the difference between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date and the effective conversion price embedded in the debt. The Company determined the commitment date of the loans to be the date of the agreement. The Company also recorded a debt discount of $4,500.00 related to the relative fair value of the 250,000 shares of Common Stock in accordance with ASC 470-20.

NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

The Company had 250,000,000 shares of $.0001 par value common stock authorized at June 30, 2010 and 2009. Of the authorized shares, 20,150,000 shares of common stock have been issued to the founders of the Company (“founder’s shares”). The Company received $10,000 in cash and $40,375 in services in consideration of the founder shares.

As of March 31, 2006, the Company completed a private placement to 40 investors and allocated 461,750 shares of common stock at $0.40 per share (“private placement shares”). The Company received gross proceeds of $184,700 from the offering. The Company incurred offering costs of $58,255 and has applied such costs against the proceeds from the offering.

During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 660,000 shares of its common stock with ~~for~~a ~~consulting~~fair ~~services~~share value ~~for~~ of $622,400 for consulting services. The Company issued 575,000 shares under the Company’s S-8 filing. The other 85,000 shares were issued pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Rule 144”).

The fair values of the shares were determined based on the closing market price of the shares at the date of the agreements.

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 5,290,000 shares of its common stock ~~for~~with ~~consulting~~a ~~services~~fair value ~~totaling~~ of $841,504 for consulting services. The Company also redeemed 12,500 shares that had been issued with a value of $11,875.

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 467,626 shares of common stock ~~for~~ with a fair value of $70,144 as repayments of amounts due to stockholders.

During the year ended June 30, 2008, in separate transactions, the Company sold in private placements and issued 125,000 shares at $.40 per share for a total of $50,000, 4,055,000 shares at $.10 per share for a total of $405,500 and 150,000 shares at $.09 per share for a total of $13,500. The fair values of the shares were determined based on the closing market price of the shares at the date of the agreements.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 38,436,000 shares of its common stock ~~for~~with ~~consulting~~a ~~services~~fair ~~totaling~~value of $700,881 for consulting services.

~~During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for $50,000 due to officers.~~F-18

~~During the~~WATERPURE ~~year ended June 30~~INTERNATIONAL, ~~2009, the Company issued 666,111 shares of common stock for $41,550 due to stockholders~~INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $50,000 as repayment of amounts due to officers.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 666,111 shares of common stock with a fair value of $41,550 as repayment of amounts due to stockholders.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, in separate transactions, the Company sold in private placements and issued 250,000 shares at $.10 per share for a total of $25,000, 1,000,000 shares at $.01 for a total of $10,000, 1,999,999 shares at $.0075 per share for a total of $15,000, 11,100,000 shares at $.005 per share for a total of $55,500, 500,000 shares at $.0024 for $1,200 and 6,000,000 shares at $.0015 per share for a total of $9,000.

~~F-12~~During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 31,058,333 shares of its common stock with a fair value of $409,576.

During the year ended June 30, 2010, in separate transactions, the Company sold in private placements and issued 16,900,000 shares at $.005 per share for a total of $84,500, 5,750,000 shares at $.01 for $57,500, 1,400,001 shares at $.007 for $10,500 and 250,000 shares at $.004 per share for a total of $1,000.

On May 5, 2010, the Company sold in private placement 2,000,000 shares of its common stock, for a total of $10,000, these shares have not been issued, and are classified as common stock to-be-issued on the June 30, 2010, financial statements. The fair value of the shares was determined based on the closing market price of the shares at the date of the agreements.

On June 15, 2010, the Company sold in private placement 66,667 shares of its common stock, for a total of $500, these shares have not been issued, and are classified as common stock to-be-issued on the June 30, 2010, financial statements. The fair value of the shares was determined based on the closing market price of the shares at the date of the agreements.

Preferred Stock

On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Mayim Tahor, LLC (“Mayim”) providing for the sale by the Company to Mayim of up to 100 shares of the Company’s series A convertible preferred stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) at a price of $2,500. On June 18, 2010 this agreement was amended to allow the purchase of up to 200 shares of the Compnay’s Series A Preferred Stock. Through June 30, 2010, Mayim has purchased 122 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for $305,000, proceeds which accounted for $275,000 in cash and $30,000 of cancellation of a note payable.

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has a stated value of $2,500 (the “Stated Value”), is entitled to a cumulative dividend of six percent (6%) of the Stated Value per annum, payable semi-annually. The Company has dividends in the arrears of $8,393. In addition, each share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive a royalty payment of $0.16 for each atmospheric water generator sold by the Company. The Company owes $648 in royalties pursuant to this agreement as of June 30, 2010.

Mayim may convert, at any time, the shares of Series A Preferred Stock into the number of shares of common stock of the Company obtained by dividing the Stated Value by the Conversion Price then in effect. The conversion price at March 31, 2010, is $0.01, as defined in the Purchase Agreement.

NOTE 10 – STOCK OPTIONS

At the time of inception (July 22, 2005), the Company issued 125,000 options to one of its consultants for services rendered. The exercise price was $0.0025, the options were immediately exercisable, and expired five years from the grant date. These options were exercised on August 29, 2007.

F-19

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9 10 – STOCK OPTIONS (continued)

At the time of inception (July 22, 2005), the Company issued 125,000 options to one of its consultants for services rendered. The exercise price was $.0025, the options were immediately exercisable, and expired five years from the grant date. These options were exercised on August 29, 2007.

During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 500,000 options to one of its executive officers. The exercise price is $0.55, which was the price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire five years from the grant date. The fair values of the options were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option price model. The Company determined that the stock option compensation was $231,300 and was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2007.

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 100,000 options to one of its executive officers. The exercise price is $0.07, which was the price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire five years from the grant date. The fair ~~values~~ value of the options ~~were~~was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option ~~price~~pricing model. The Company determined that the stock option compensation was $6,845 and was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2008.

During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company ~~also~~ issued 3,000,000 options to one of its executive officers. The exercise price ~~was~~is $0.10, which was is a discount to the price of the Company’s common stock ~~price~~ of $0.20 on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire five years from the grant date. The fair ~~values~~value of the options ~~were~~was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option ~~price~~pricing model. The Company determined that the stock option compensation was $576,092 and was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2008.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 options to one of its executive officers. The exercise price is $0.015, which was the price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire five years from the grant date. The fair ~~values~~ value of the options ~~were~~was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option ~~price~~pricing model. The Company determined that the stock option compensation was $1,492 and was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2009.

On November 4, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 options to one of its convertible debt holders (Note 8). The exercise price is $0.005, which is a discount to the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.017 on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire one year from the grant date. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined the fair value to be $1,421. The Company determined that the stock option issuances resulted in a debt discount of $1,261.

On April 1, 2010, the Company issued 16,666 options to one of its convertible debt holders (Note 8). The exercise price is $0.005, which is a discount to the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.012 on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire one year from the grant date. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined the fair value to be $163. The Company determined that the stock option issuances resulted in a debt discount of $148.

On April 29, 2010, the Company issued 16,666 options to one of its convertible debt holders (Note 8). The exercise price is $0.005, which is a discount to the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.02 on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire one year from the grant date. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined the fair value to be $274. The Company determined that the stock option issuances resulted in a debt discount of $235.

On April 30, 2010, the Company issued 16,666 options to one of its convertible debt holders (Note 8). The exercise price is $0.005, which is a discount to the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.022 on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire one year from the grant date. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined the fair value to be $306. The Company determined that the stock option issuances resulted in a debt discount of $259.

On May 10, 2010, the Company issued 3,333,333 options to one of its convertible debt holders (Note 8). The exercise price is $0.05, which is a premium to the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.017 on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire six months from the grant date. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined the fair value to be $5,971. The Company determined that the stock option issuances resulted in a debt discount of $5,334.

F-20

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 10 – STOCK OPTIONS (continued)

On May 14, 2010, the Company issued 3,333,333 options to one of its convertible debt holders (Note 8). The exercise price is $0.05, which is a premium to the price of the Company’s common stock of $0.023 on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire six months from the grant date. The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined the fair value to be $12,488. The Company determined that the stock option issuances resulted in a debt discount of $7,688.

During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 options to one of its executive officers. The exercise price is $0.018, which was the price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The options are immediately exercisable and expire five years from the grant date. The fair values of the options were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company determined that the stock option compensation was $1,800 and was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2010.

To determine the fair value of the options granted, the Company used the following assumptions in its Black-Scholes option-price calculations:

Issue date	~~June 30, 2007~~	~~January~~June 130,~~2008~~ 2007	~~June 30, 2008~~	~~June 30, 2009~~	January 1, 2008		June 30, 2008
Options issued	~~500,000~~	3500,000~~,000~~	~~100,000~~	~~100,000~~	3,000,000		100,000
Risk-free interest rate	5%	35%	3%	3%	3%		3%
Expected option life	~~5 years~~	5 years	~~5 years~~	~~5 years~~	5 years		5 years
Dividend yield	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%		0%
Volatility	~~120%~~	~~157~~120%	~~194%~~	~~290%~~	164%		194%
Exercise price	~~$ 0.55~~	$ ~~0.10~~	$ 0.0755	~~$ 0.015~~	$	0.10	$	0.07

Issue date	June 30, 2009		November 4, 2009		April 1, 2010
Options issued	100,000		100,000		16,666
Risk-free interest rate	2.54%		0.36%		0.42%
Expected option life	5 years		1 year		1 year
Dividend yield	0%		0%		0%
Volatility	290%		192%		165%
Exercise price	$	0.015	$	0.005	$	0.005

Issue date	April 29, 2010		April 30, 2010		May 10, 2010
Options issued	16,666		16,666		6,666,666
Risk-free interest rate	0.42%		0.41%		0.22%
Expected option life	1 year		1 year		six months
Dividend yield	0%		0%		0%
Volatility	162%		162%		203%
Exercise price	$	0.005	$	0.005	$	0.05

F-21

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 10 – STOCK OPTIONS (continued)

Issue date	May 14, 2010		June 30, 2010
Options issued	3,333,333		100,000
Risk-free interest rate	0.22%		1.79%
Expected option life	six months		5 years
Dividend yield	0%		0%
Volatility	203%		383%
Exercise price	$	0.05	$	0.018

These assumptions were determined as follows:

· The risk free interest rate for the period within the contractual life of the option is based on the ~~5-year~~ U.S. Treasury ~~yield~~yields at the time of the ~~grant~~grants based on the expected option life.

·	The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding.

·	Historically, the Company has not paid a dividend on its common shares and does not expect to do so in the future.

·	The volatility assumption represents an expectation of the volatility of the price of the underlying shares for the expected term of the option, considering factors such as historical stock price and stock volatility of other companies within the industry.

F-1322

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9 10 – STOCK OPTIONS (continued)

The following is a summary of the status of stock option activity for the period from inception (July 22, 2005) through June 30, ~~2009~~2010:

	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price	~~Weighted Average Exercise Price~~
Outstanding as of July 22, 2005 (inception)		-	$	$-	-
Granted		125,000		0.0025	~~0.0025~~
Exercised		-		-	-
Forfeited		-		-	-
Expired		-		-	-
Outstanding as of June 30, 2006		125,000	$	$0.0025	~~0.0025~~
Granted		500,000		0.5500	~~0.5500~~
Exercised		-		-	-
Forfeited		-		-	-
Expired		-		-	-
Outstanding as of June 30, 2007		625,000	$	$0.4400	~~0.4400~~
Granted		3,100,000		0.0990	~~0.0990~~
Exercised		125,000		0.0025	~~0.0025~~
Forfeited		-		-	-
Expired		-		-	-
Outstanding as of June 30, 2008		3,600,000	$	$0.1610	~~0.1610~~
Granted		100,000		.0150	~~.0150~~
Exercised		-		-	-
Forfeited		-		-	-
Expired		-		-	-
Outstanding as of June 30, 2009		3,700,000	$	$0.1577	~~0.1577~~
Exercisable as of June 30, 2009		3,700,000		$	581,100
Granted		10,249,997		.0021
Exercised		-		-
Forfeited		-		-
Expired		-		-
Outstanding as of June 30, 2010		13,949,997	$	.0434

125,000 options were exercised and $313 was received from the exercise of options ~~for~~ during the year ended June 30, 2008. No options were exercised for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

The ~~intrinsic~~ ~~value~~Company ofhad ~~the~~13,949,997 ~~options~~shares ~~granted~~exercisable ~~was~~as $1of June 30,~~492~~ ~~for~~2010 ~~the~~and 3,700,000 ~~year~~shares ~~ended~~exercisable as of June 30, 2009.

~~NOTE 10~~The -intrinsic ~~RELATED~~value ~~PARTY~~of ~~TRANSACTIONS~~the options granted was $1,950 for the year ended June 30, 2010

NOTE 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

LEASE

The Company subleases ~~their~~its office space for $500 per month on a month-to-month basis from Stein, Feldman and Sampson, LLC, of with which, Mr. Orr, ~~our~~the Company’s Chief Financial Officer is affiliated~~, for $500 per month on a month-to-month basis~~.

~~DUE TO OFFICERS~~F-23

During the year ended June 30, 2009, officers extended cash to the Company in the amount of $55,176 to fund working capital needs to pay operating expenses. The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock as repayment for $50,000 of the amount due to officers. The total amount due officers was $103,229 and $98,053 as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company does not intend to pay interest on the amounts borrowed from officers.

F-14

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 10 11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)

DUE TO OFFICERS AND STOCKHOLDERS

During the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~certain~~officers ~~stockholders~~advanced ~~extended~~ cash to the Company in the amount of $2313,~~505~~627 to fund working capital needs. ~~The~~to ~~Company~~pay ~~issued 666,111~~operating ~~shares of common stock as repayment for $41,550 of the amount due to stockholders~~expenses. The total amount due toofficers ~~stockholders~~ was $8788,~~124~~508 and $~~105~~103,~~169~~229 as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. The Company does not intend to pay interest on the amounts borrowed from ~~stockholders~~officers.

~~NOTE 11~~During -the ~~INCOME~~year ~~TAXES~~ended June 30, 2010, certain stockholders advanced cash to the Company in the amount of $35,072 to fund working capital needs. The total amount due to stockholders was $104,796 and $87,124 as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company does not intend to pay interest on the amounts borrowed from stockholders.

~~The Company~~During ~~adopted~~ the ~~provisions~~year ofended ~~FASB~~June ~~Interpretation No. 48~~30, ~~“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN No. 48”)~~2010, ~~on July 1, 2007. FIN No. 48 requires that~~ the ~~impact of tax positions be recognized in the financial statements if they are more likely than not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. The~~ Company ~~has a~~received valuation allowance against the full amount of its net deferred tax assets. The Company currently provides a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portionadvances, ormade ~~all of its deferred tax assets~~repayments, ~~will~~and ~~not~~had beamounts ~~realized.~~due ~~There was no impact~~ to ~~the~~officers ~~Company~~and asstockholders ~~a result of adopting FIN No. 48~~ as ~~the~~disclosed ~~Company’s~~in ~~management~~Note ~~has determined that the Company has no uncertain tax positions requiring recognition under FIN No~~6. ~~48 both on July 1, 2007 (adoption) and on June 30, 2009 and 2008.~~

~~The Company~~NOTE is12 ~~subject~~- toINCOME U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of certain state jurisdictions. The Company has not been audited by the I.R.S. or any states in connection with income taxes. The periods from inception – 2008 remain open to examination by the I.R.S. and state authorities.TAXES

The provisions of ASC 740-10 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income”, requires that the impact of tax positions be recognized in the financial statements if they are more likely than not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. There was no impact to the Company as a result of adopting ASC 740-10 as the Company’s management has determined that the Company has no uncertain tax positions requiring recognition under ASC 740-10 as of June 30, 2010 and 2009.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of certain state jurisdictions. The Company has not been audited by the I.R.S. or any states in connection with income taxes. The periods from inception – 2009 remain open to examination by the I.R.S. and state authorities.

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense. Penalties, if incurred, are recognized as a component of tax expense.

Significant items making up the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

	2009			2008
	2010			2009
Net deferred tax assets:
Net deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	1,309,000		$	920,000
Net operating loss carry forward	$	1,666,680		$	1,309,000
Less valuation allowance		(1,309,000	)		(920,000	)
Less Valuation allowance		(1,666,680	)		(1,309,000	)
Total net deferred tax assets	$	-		$	-

A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Accordingly, a valuation allowance was established in ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 for the full amount of the deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of realization. Management believes that based upon its projection of future taxable operating income for the foreseeable future, it is more likely than not that the Company will not be able to realize the benefit of the deferred tax asset at June 30, ~~2009~~2010. The valuation allowance as of June 30, ~~2008~~2009 was $~~920~~1,309,000. The net change in the valuation allowance during the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 was an increase of $~~385~~357,~~280~~680.

~~The Company had net operating loss carry~~F-~~forwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $3,850,000 at June 30, 2009. These net operating loss carry-forwards expire at various dates from 2027 through 2028.~~ 24

F-15

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 11 12 - INCOME TAXES (continued)

The Company had net operating loss carry-forwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $4,902,000 at June 30, 2010. These net operating loss carry-forwards expire at various dates from 2027 through 2029.

The Company’s effective income tax (benefit) rate for continuing operations differs from the statutory federal income tax benefit rate as follows:

	2009			2008
	2010			2009
Federal Statutory Rate		35	%		35	%
Other		(7	) %		(7	) %
Valuation allowance		(28	) %		(28	) %
Effective income tax (benefit) provision rate from continuing operations		-			-

NOTE 12 13 – COMMITMENTS

The Company’s executive offices are located is located in Plymouth Meeting, PAPennsylvania. The rent for the office space is $500 a month, and the Company rents the space on a month-to-month basis.

In ~~June 2007~~November 2009, the Company ~~opened~~moved aits ~~regional~~manufacturing operations ~~center~~to inOakland Park, Florida to accommodate administrative, sales and ~~customer~~manufacturing ~~relations’~~ personnel. The Company entered into a ~~month-to-month~~five year operating lease ~~for~~with $lease ~~543~~payments ~~per~~beginning ~~month~~February 1, 2010.

~~The Company~~Future ~~owes~~minimum ~~Everest~~lease ~~$430,000 to be paid over 33 months starting September 1, 2008, and 8% royalty~~ payments ~~with~~are ~~guarantee minimum payments~~ as follows: ~~$50,000 year one, $60,000 year two, $70,000 year three, $90,000 year four and $100,000 each year after.~~

NOTE 13 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Year ending June 30, 2011	$	33,771
2012	$	36,230
2013	$	38,689
2014	$	41,147
2015	$	24,839
Total	$	174,676

The Company ~~has~~owes ~~evaluated~~Everest ~~subsequent~~$392,000 ~~events~~to ~~through~~be ~~October~~paid 12over 33 months starting April 1, ~~2009~~2010, ~~which~~and is5% ~~the date~~royalty ~~the~~payments ~~financials~~with ~~were~~guaranteed ~~issued~~minimum payments as follows: $30,000 year one, $40,000 year two, $50,000 year three, $75,000 year four and $100,000 each year after. See Note 5.

~~On October~~NOTE 1,14 ~~2009,~~– ~~the~~SUBSEQUENT ~~Company received a $40,000 deposit for the exclusive rights to sell the WaterPure Atmospheric Water Generators in the country of Mexico.~~EVENTS

~~Effective July~~The ~~1, 2009, the~~ Company ~~amended~~on aJuly ~~convertible~~15, ~~debt~~2010, ~~agreement~~issued ~~with~~ a ~~face amount of~~ $5025,000 ~~originally~~demand ~~dated~~note ~~May 21, 2007. The amendment~~ to ~~the~~an ~~agreement calls~~accredited ~~for~~investor ~~payments~~which ofaccrues ~~principal and~~ interest ~~thereon~~ at ~~the annual rate of 12~~18% per annum ofin ~~$5,000~~cash ~~per~~and ~~month~~is ~~through~~immediately ~~April~~payable 1,upon ~~2010.~~demand Asor ofconverted ~~October~~into ~~12,~~common ~~2009~~stock ~~the Company~~at ~~has~~$.01 ~~made~~per ~~only one payment under the amended agreement~~share.

~~F-16~~The Company on July 22, 2010, issued a $15,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand.

The Company on July 29, 2010, issued a $15,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand or converted into common stock at $.01 per share.

The Company on August 5, 2010, issued a $15,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand or converted into common stock at $.01 per share.

On August 16, 2010 the holders of a majority of shares of common stock approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock par value $.0001 per share to 500,000,000 shares. They also reelected the Company’s current Board of Directors Messrs. Pail Lipschutz and Robert Orr.

F-25

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)

The Company on August 20, 2010, issued 300,000 shares of common stock and a $20,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand.

The Company on August 26, 2010, issued a $15,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand or converted into common stock at $.01 per share.

The Company on September 1, 2010 issued 9,974,868 shares of common stock as follows: 7,450,000 for consulting services valued at $74,500, 2,000,000 shares of common stock previously classified as to-be-issued, 100,000 shares of common stock for $500 and 424,868 shares of common stock as satisfaction of certain accounts payable in the amount of $6,373.

The Company on September 2, 2010, issued a $25,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand or converted into common stock at $.01 per share.

The Company on September 10, 2010, issued 150,000 shares of common stock and a $22,500 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand.

The Company on September 23, 2010 issued 66,667 shares of common stock previously classified as stock to-be-issued. In addition the Company issued 600,000 of common stock in satisfaction of accrued interest relating to issuances of new demand notes, and the Company also issued 750,000 shares of common stock for consulting services valued at $7,500.

The Company on September 24, 2010, issued a $18,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand or converted into common stock at $.01 per share.

The Company on October 8, 2010, issued a $31,000 demand note to an accredited investor which accrues interest at 18% per annum in cash and is immediately payable upon demand or converted into common stock at $.01 per share.

F-26

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There have been no disagreements between the Company and its accountants as to accounting matters or matters which require disclosure.

ITEM 9A~~(T)~~ – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain "disclosure controls and procedures," as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management ~~necessarily~~ was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

As of June 30, ~~2009~~2010, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on our evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as a result of the material weaknesses described below, our disclosure controls and procedures are not designed at a reasonable assurance level and are ineffective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is not accumulated nor communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The material weaknesses, which relate to internal control over financial reporting, that were identified are:

a) We did not have sufficient personnel in our accounting and financial reporting functions. As a result, we were not able to achieve adequate ~~segregation~~separation of duties and were not able to provide for adequate reviewing of the financial statements. This control deficiency, which is pervasive in nature, results in a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis;

b) We did not maintain sufficient personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of U.S. GAAP commensurate with ~~our~~out complexity and our financial accounting and reporting requirements. This control deficiency is pervasive in nature. Further, there is a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the financial statements including disclosures will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis as a result; ~~and~~

c) We did not document or test our key controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. As a result, we cannot provide proper recording of the framework for our internal controls nor the results of such controls. There is a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the financial statements including disclosures will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis without the ability to determine if our ~~testing~~controls ~~was~~are ~~properly conducted~~effective.

We are committed to improving our accounting and financial ~~organization~~reporting functions. As part of this commitment, we will create a segregation of duties consistent with control objectives and will look to increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function by the end of fiscal ~~2010~~2011 to ~~resolve~~appropriately address non-routine or complex accounting matters. In addition, when funds are available to the Company, which we expect to occur by the end of fiscal ~~2010~~2011, we will take the following action to enhance our internal controls: Hiring additional knowledgeable personnel with technical accounting expertise to further support the current accounting personnel at the Company, which management estimates will cost approximately $75,000 per annum. We will engage outside consultants in the future as necessary in order to ensure ~~proper treatment of~~ non-routine or complex accounting matters are appropriately addressed. In addition, management isintends ~~working~~ to establish written procedures to document and test the key controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

1619

Management believes that hiring additional knowledgeable personnel with technical accounting expertise will remedy the following material weaknesses: (A) lack of sufficient personnel in our accounting and financial reporting functions to achieve adequate segregation of duties; and (B) insufficient personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of US GAAP commensurate with our complexity and our financial accounting and reporting requirements.

Management believes that the hiring of additional personnel who have the technical expertise and knowledge with the non-routine or technical issues we have encountered in the past will result in both proper recording of these transactions and a much more knowledgeable finance department as a whole. Due to the fact that our accounting staff consists of a Chief Financial Officer and an accounting clerk, additional personnel will also ensure the proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the department. Additional personnel will also provide the cross training needed to support us if personnel turnover issues within the department occur. We believe this will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues we may encounter in the future.

We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

•

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets;

•

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

•

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management has conducted, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, an assessment, including testing of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009. Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting was based on the framework in Internal Control over Financial Reporting – Guidance for Smaller Public Companies issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, Management concluded that our system of internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of June 30, ~~2009~~2010.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010 has not been audited by CCR LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to ~~temporary~~a ~~rules~~permanent ofexemption ~~the~~granted ~~Securities and~~to ~~Exchange~~smaller ~~Commission~~reporting ~~that~~companies ~~permit~~pursuant Sarbanes Oxley Act 404(c), which permits the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERANCE

Our directors and executive officers and their ages as of the date hereof are as follows:

Name	Age	Position
Paul S. Lipschutz	6364	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Robert F. Orr	4344	Chief Financial Officer and Director

Paul Lipschutz. Mr. Lipschutz has been our President, Chief Executive Officer and a director since July 2005. Since 1992, Mr. Lipschutz has been the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Collectible Concepts Group, Inc. Mr. Lipschutz is a 1967 graduate of The Wharton School of Finance and Commerce of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Lipschutz was originally selected to serve as a director due to his deep familiarity with our business, his extensive entrepreneurial background and many years of senior management experience in a variety of sectors.

Robert F. Orr. Mr. Orr has been our Chief Financial Officer and Director since July 2005. Since January 1997, Mr. Orr has worked for the accounting firm of Stein, Feldman and Sampson, LLC. Since January, 1999, Mr. Orr has been the Chief Financial Officer of Idayo Investor, a web based financial content provider. Mr. Orr is a graduate from the University of Delaware and a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Orr was selected to serve as a director due to his deep familiarity with our business and his substantial financial and accounting experience.

Board Committees

We currently do not have any board committees; however, the Board of Directors will form an audit committee at such time as there are at least two independent directors. Our Board of Directors currently acts as our audit, compensation and nominating committees.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our ~~director~~ directors, executive ~~officer~~officers and control ~~person~~persons if more than one person have not been involved in any of the following events during the part five years:

1.	any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

2.	any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3.	being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

4.	being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Owner Reporting Compliance

Since we are governed under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, we are not required to file reports of executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for our officers, directors and employees. A copy of the Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference as an exhibit.

1821

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following tables set forth certain information regarding our CEO and each of our most highly-compensated executive officers whose total annual salary and bonus for the fiscal years ~~ending~~ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~2009 exceeded $100,000

Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)	~~Bonus ($)~~		Stock Awards ($)	~~Stock Awards ($)~~	Option Awards ($)		~~Option Awards ($)~~	Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	~~Non-equity~~Change ~~Incentive~~in ~~Plan~~Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		~~Change~~All inOther ~~Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred~~ Compensation ~~Earnings~~ ($)		Total ($)	~~All Other Compensation ($)~~		~~Total ($)~~
Paul S. Lipschutz (President, CEO and		~~2009~~2010	150,000	~~150,000~~		-0-	~~-0-~~	36,000		~~-0-~~	-0-		-0-		-0-	-0-	~~-0-~~		-0-	~~-0-~~		~~-0-~~
Director) (1)		~~2008~~2009	150,000	~~75,000~~		-0-	~~-0-~~	-0-		~~-0-~~	-0-		~~576,092~~-0-		-0-	-0-	~~-0-~~		-0-	~~-0-~~		~~-0-~~
Robert F. Orr (CFO		2009		-0-			-0-			-0-			1,492		-0-		-0-			-0-		-0-
and Director)		2008		-0-			-0-			-0-			6,845		-0-		-0-			-0-		-0-

(1) The full amount of compensation due to Mr. Lipschutz has not been paid in the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2008~~2010 and 2009. We and Paul Lipschutz have agreed to accrue his salary until there is ~~significant~~adequate cash flow to enable usthe Company to pay his salary.

Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

Paul S. Lipschutz

Effective January 1, 2008, we entered into an employment agreement with Paul S. Lipschutz as Chief Executive Officer for a period of three years. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Lipschutz receives an annual salary of $150,000. In addition, Mr. Lipschutz is entitled to receive an annual bonus based upon various criteria targets upon execution of the agreement. Mr. Lipschutz received options to purchase three million shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 ~~upon execution of the agreement,~~ which expire five years after issuance. Additionally, Mr. Lipschutz is entitled to participate in any and all benefit plans, from time to time, in effect for executives, along with vacation, sick and holiday pay in accordance with our policies established and in effect from time to time.

Robert F. Orr

Effective July 1, 2006, we entered into an employment agreement with Robert F. Orr as Chief Financial Officer for a period of five years. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Orr received 500,000 options for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 and thereafter, receives an annual salary of 100,000 options per year. The options have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on June 30 of each year. Additionally, Mr. Orr is entitled to participate in any and all benefit plans, from time to time, in effect for executives, along with vacation, sick and holiday pay in accordance with our policies established and in effect from time-to-time.

1922

Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year

Name and Position	Number of Units
Paul S. Lipschutz, Chief Executive Officer	-0-
Robert F. Orr, Chief Financial Officer		100,000
Executives as a Group		100,000

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table.

Option Awards								Stock Awards	~~Stock Awards~~
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	~~Option~~Number ~~Expiration~~of ~~Date~~Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	~~Number~~Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#$)		~~Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)~~	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: ~~Number~~Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#$)		~~Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)~~
Paul S. Lipschutz		3,000,000	-0-		-0-	.~~100~~10	01/01/2013	~~01/01/2013~~-0-	~~-0-~~	-0-		-0-	~~-0-~~	-0-		~~-0-~~
Robert F. Orr		~~700~~500,000	-0-		-0-	.~~410~~55	06/30/2012	~~06/30/2012~~-0-	~~-0-~~	-0-		-0-	~~-0-~~	-0-		~~-0-~~
		100,000	-0-		-0-	.07	06/30/2013	-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
		100,000	-0-		-0-	.015	06/30/2014	-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-
		100,000	-0-		-0-	.018	06/30/2015	-0-		-0-		-0-		-0-

Director Compensation

Our directors are elected by the vote of a majority in interest of the holders of our voting stock and hold office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected and until a successor has been elected and qualified.

A majority of the authorized number of directors constitutes a quorum of the Board of Directors for the transaction of business. The directors must be present at the meeting to constitute a quorum. However, any action required or permitted to be taken by the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting if all members of the Board of Directors individually or collectively consent in writing to the action. ~~We pay $1,500 in stock per quarter as compensation to our directors plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in connection with providing services as a director.~~

2023

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of October 1213, ~~2009~~2010.

·	by each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;

·	by each of our officers and directors; and

·	by all of our officers and directors as a group.

NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER	TITLE OF CLASS	~~NUMBER OF SHARES OWNED (1)~~	NUMBER OF SHARES OWNED (1)	~~PERCENTAGE OF CLASS (2)~~	PERCENTAGE OF CLASS (2)
Paul S. Lipschutz	Common Stock	~~19,162,382 (3)~~	32,162,382 (3)	~~17.96%~~	19.68%
525 Plymouth Road, Suite 310
Plymouth Meeting, PA
Robert F. Orr	Common Stock	~~6,385,000 (4)~~	12,485,000 (4)	~~6.11%~~	7.74%
525 Plymouth Road, Suite 310
Plymouth Meeting, PA
All Officers and Directors	Common Stock	~~25,547,382 (3) (4)~~	44,647,382 (3) (4)	~~23.78%~~	27.42%
As a Group (2 persons)

(1) Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of ~~October~~September 127, ~~2009~~2010 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such option or warrant but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.

(2) Based upon ~~103~~160,~~723~~423,~~986~~855 shares issued and outstanding on October 1213, ~~2009~~2010.

(3) Includes 3,000,000 shares of common stock underlying options currently exercisable. Also includes 47,~~272~~074,382 shares owned by Paul Lipschutz’s spouse.

(4) Includes ~~700~~800,000 shares of common stock underlying options currently exercisable. Also includes Mr. Orr’s 25% ownership interest of two partnerships, each of which owns 5,000 shares of our common stock.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Set forth below are the related party transactions since June 30, ~~2007~~2008, among WaterPure International Inc. and its shareholders, officers, and/or directors:

Pursuant to the employment agreement with our CFO dated July 1, 2006, we issued 100,000 five year options to Robert Orr. The strike price of the options is equal to the closing price of our stock on June 30, 2008 (the last business day in our fiscal year end) exercise price was $0.07. We recognized $6,845 in expense for the issuance of these options.

Pursuant to the employment agreement with our CFO dated July 1, 2006, we issued 100,000 five year options to Robert Orr. The strike price of the options is equal to the closing price of our stock on June 30, 2009 (the last business day in our fiscal year end) exercise price was $0.015. We recognized $1,492 in expense for the issuance of these options.

Pursuant to the employment agreement with our ~~CEO~~CFO dated ~~January~~July 1, ~~2008~~2006, we issued 3 100,000~~,000~~ five- year options to ~~Paul~~Robert ~~Lipschutz~~Orr. The ~~exercise~~strike price ~~was~~of ~~$0.10, which~~the options is aequal ~~discount~~ to the closing price of our ~~common~~ stock ~~price~~on ofJune ~~$0.20~~30, on2010 (the ~~grant date. The~~last ~~options~~business ~~were~~day ~~immediately~~in ~~exercisable~~our ~~and~~fiscal ~~expire~~year ~~five years from the grant date.~~end) ~~The~~exercise ~~fair values of the options were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option~~ price ~~model~~was $0.018. We ~~determined~~recognized ~~that the stock option compensation was~~ $~~576~~1,~~092~~800 ~~and~~in ~~was~~expense ~~recognized~~for ~~during~~ the ~~year ended~~issuance ~~June~~of ~~30,~~these ~~2008~~options.

Leases

We sublease our office space for $500 per month on a month to month basis from Stein, Feldman and Sampson, LLC, of which, Mr. Orr, our Chief Financial Officer is affiliated~~, for $500 per month on a month to month basis~~.

In April 2006, we entered into a sublease for the rental of our office space with Collectible Concepts Group, Inc., of which, Mr. Lipschutz, our Chief Executive Officer is their President, for $170 per month for a six month period. In October 2007, the lease was extended for an additional twelve months. This lease is no longer in effect as of June 30, 2009.

Loans

During the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, the officers ~~extended~~advanced cash to us in the amount of $5513,~~176~~627 to fund working capital needs to pay operating expenses. ~~We issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock as repayment for $50,000 of the amount due to officers.~~ The total amount due officers was $~~103~~88,~~229~~508 and $98103,~~053~~229, as of June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. We do not intend to pay interest on the amounts borrowed from this officer.

During the year ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010, certain stockholders ~~extended~~advanced cash to us in the amount of $2335,~~505~~072 to fund working capital needs. ~~We issued 666,111 shares of common stock as repayment for $41,550 of the amount due to stockholders.~~ The total amount due to stockholders was $87104,~~124~~796 and $~~105~~87,~~169~~124 as of June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010 and ~~2008~~2009, respectively. We do not intend to pay interest on the amounts borrowed from these stockholders.

Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions

Our board of directors is charged with reviewing and approving all potential related party transactions. All such related party transactions must then be reported under applicable SEC rules. We have not adopted other procedures for review, or standards for approval, of such transactions, but instead review them on a case-by-case basis.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements during the years ended June 30, ~~2009~~ 2010 and ~~2008~~2009, and for the reviews of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Forms 10Q and 10-QSB during the fiscal years, were $4449,~~542~~ 372 and $5144,~~526~~542, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

There were no audit related fees during the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~ 2009 for audit related services.

Tax Fees

There were no tax related fees during the fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~ 2009 for tax compliance or tax consulting services.

All Other Fees

Our independent registered public accounting firm did not bill us during fiscal years ended June 30, ~~2009~~2010 or ~~2008~~2009 for other services.

The Board of Directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence.

2225

PART IV

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibits:

3.1	Articles of Incorporation, filed as an exhibit to the registration statement on Form SB-2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.2	By-laws, filed as an exhibit to the registration statement on Form SB-2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.3	Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, filed as an exhibit to the registration statement on Form SB-2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

3.4	Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation, filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference.

10.1	Employment Agreement by and between WaterPure International, Inc. and Paul S. Lipschutz, dated as of January 1, 2008.

10.2	Employment Agreement by and between WaterPure International, Inc. and Robert F. Orr, dated as of July 1, 2006.

10.3	License Agreement by and between WaterPure International, Inc. and Everest Water Ltd., dated as of December 7, 2007.

10.4	Amendment to License Agreement by and between WaterPure International, Inc. and Everest Water Ltd., dated as of August 1, 2008.

10.5	Amendment to License Agreement by and between WaterPure International, Inc. and Everest Water Ltd., dated as of March 29, 2010.

14.1	Code of Ethics, filed as an exhibit to the annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.

31.01

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.01

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

2326

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WATERPURE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date: October 13, 2009	By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
Date: October 15, 2010	By: /s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ
	Paul S. Lipschutz
	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: October 13, 2009	By: /s/ ROBERT F. ORR
Date: October 15, 2010	By: /s/ ROBERT F. ORR
	Robert F. Orr
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Position	Date
/s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ Paul S. Lipschutz	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director	October 13, 2009
/s/ PAUL S. LIPSCHUTZ	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Director	October 15, 2010
/s/ ROBERT F. ORR Robert F. Orr	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)	October 13, 2009
Paul S. Lipschutz
/s/ ROBERT F. ORR	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)	October 15, 2010
Robert F. Orr

2427

Filing Compare · WaterPure International