As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2012

Registration No. 333-173700

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

____________________________

AMENDMENT NO. 3

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

_____________________________

ANHUI TAIYANG POULTRY CO., INC.

(Name of registrant in its charter)

	Delaware		2015		65-0918608
	(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

No. 88, Eastern Outer Ring Road

Ningguo City, Anhui Province, 242300

People’s Republic of China

(+86) 0563-430-9999

(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices and principal place of business)

Wu Qiyou, Chief Executive Officer

Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc.

No. 88, Eastern Outer Ring Road

Ningguo City, Anhui Province, 242300

People’s Republic of China

(+86) 0563-430-9999

(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)

Copies to:

Marc A. Ross, Esq.

James M. Turner, Esq.

Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP

61 Broadway, 32nd Flr.

New York, New York 10006

(212) 930-9700

(212) 930-9725 (fax)

APPROXIMATE DATE OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:

From time to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box: x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ________

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. _________

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. _________

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. _________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filed,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class Of Securities To Be Registered	Amount To Be Registered (1)		Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Security (2)		Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price		Amount Of Registration Fee
Common Stock, $.001 par value		5,485,300	$	1.50	$	8,227,950	$	955.26
Common Stock, $.001 par value issuable upon exercise of warrants		1,142,396	$	4.00	$	4,569,584	$	530.53
Total		6,627,696			$	12,797,534	$	1,485.79	(3)

(1)	Includes shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, which may be offered pursuant to this registration statement, which shares are issuable upon exercise of warrants held by the selling stockholders. In addition to the shares set forth in the table, the amount to be registered includes an indeterminate number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, as such number may be adjusted as a result of stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions in accordance with Rule 416. The number of shares of common stock registered hereunder represents a good faith estimate by us of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. For purposes of estimating the number of shares of common stock to be included in this registration statement, we calculated a good faith estimate of the number of shares of our common stock that we believe will be issuable upon exercise of the warrants to account for market fluctuations, and antidilution and price protection adjustments, respectively. Should the conversion ratio result in our having insufficient shares, we will not rely upon Rule 416, but will file a new registration statement to cover the resale of such additional shares should that become necessary. In addition, should a decrease in the exercise price as a result of an issuance or sale of shares below the then current market price, result in our having insufficient shares, we will not rely upon Rule 416, but will file a new registration statement to cover the resale of such additional shares should that become necessary.

(2)	Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) and Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act of 1933, using the average of the high and low price as reported on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board on April 20, 2011, which was $1.50 per share.

(3)	Previously paid.

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED January 18, 2012

ANHUI TAIYANG POULTRY CO., INC.

6,627,696 SHARES OF

COMMON STOCK

This prospectus relates to the resale by the selling stockholders of up to 6,627,696 shares of our common stock, including up to 1,142,396 shares of common stock underlying warrants exercisable at $4.00 per share. The selling stockholders may sell common stock from time to time in the principal market on which the stock is traded at the prevailing market price or in negotiated transactions. The selling stockholders may be deemed underwriters of the shares of common stock which they are offering. We will pay the expenses of registering these shares.

Our common stock is registered under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is available for quotation on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “DUKS”. The last reported sales price per share of our common stock as reported by the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board on January 9, 2012 , was $ 1.25 .

Investing in these securities involves significant risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this Prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is _____, 2012 .

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. This prospectus is included in the Registration Statement that was filed by Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The selling stockholders may not sell these securities until the registration statement becomes effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the sale is not permitted.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
About this Prospectus		1
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Other Information Contained in this Prospectus		1
Prospectus Summary		2
Risk Factors		6
Use of Proceeds		19
Market For Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters		20
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		21
Business		41
Description of Property		52
Legal Proceedings		52
Management		53
Executive Compensation		56
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		57
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		61
Description of Securities		62
Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities		63
Plan of Distribution		64
Selling Stockholders		66
Legal Matters		71
Experts		72
Additional Information		72
Index to Financial Statements		73

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not, and the underwriter has not, authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are offering to sell, and are seeking offers to buy, shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the common stock. Our business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

iii

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that contained in this prospectus. The selling stockholders are offering to sell and seeking offers to buy shares of our common stock, including shares they acquire upon exercise of their warrants, only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our common stock. The prospectus will be updated and updated prospectuses made available for delivery to the extent required by the federal securities laws.

No person is authorized in connection with this prospectus to give any information or to make any representations about us, the selling stockholders, the securities or any matter discussed in this prospectus, other than the information and representations contained in this prospectus. If any other information or representation is given or made, such information or representation may not be relied upon as having been authorized by us or any selling stockholder. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy the securities in any circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is unlawful. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any distribution of securities in accordance with this prospectus shall, under any circumstances, imply that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this prospectus. The prospectus will be updated and updated prospectuses made available for delivery to the extent required by the federal securities laws.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

AND OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus contains some forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among other things, (a) our projected sales, profitability, and cash flows, (b) our growth strategies, (c) anticipated trends in our industries, (d) our future financing plans and (e) our anticipated needs for working capital. They are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plans,” “potential,” “projects,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expects,” “management believes,” “we believe,” “we intend” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These statements may be found under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business,” as well as in this prospectus generally. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective products or product approvals, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, and financial results.

Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report may turn out to be inaccurate. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks or uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future results may vary materially as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” and matters described in this prospectus generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this filing will in fact occur. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except to the extent required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as the result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

The following summary highlights selected information contained in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before investing in the securities. Before making an investment decision, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the “risk factors” section, the financial statements and the notes to the financial statements.

ANHUI TAIYANG POULTRY CO., INC.

We are private breeder and seller of ducks and duck parts in the People’s Republic of China (“China” or “PRC”). Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Dynamic Ally Limited (“Dynamic”) was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands on March 2, 2010. Dynamic owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Ningguo Taiyang Incubation Plant C., Ltd. (“Ningguo”), a wholly foreign owned enterprise (“WFOE”) established under the laws of the PRC. On May 26, 2010, Ningguo entered into a series of contractual agreements with Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Ltd. (“Taiyang”), a company incorporated under the laws of the PRC, and its three owners, in which Ningguo effectively assumed management of the business activities of Taiyang and has the right to appoint all executives and senior management and the members of the board of directors of Taiyang. The contractual arrangements are comprised of a series of agreements, including a Consulting Services Agreement and Operating Agreement, through which Ningguo has the right to advise, consult and manage Taiyang and its business operations for a quarterly consulting fee equal to all of Taiyang’s quarterly net profit. We will receive distributions from our consolidated affiliates only to the extent service fees are paid to Ningguo under these series of agreements and further distributed as dividends or other shareholder distributions by Ningguo. To secure payment of the service fees, Taiyang’s shareholders have pledged their rights, titles and equity interest in Taiyang as security for Ningguo to collect the consulting fee from Taiyang through an Equity Pledge Agreement. In order to further reinforce Ningguo’s rights to control and manage Taiyang, Taiyang’s shareholders have granted Ningguo the exclusive right to exercise their voting rights pursuant to a Voting Rights Proxy Agreement, as well as the exclusive right and option to acquire all of their equity interests in Taiyang through an Option Agreement.

All of the business operations are carried out by Taiyang, which we control through contractual arrangements between Ningguo and Taiyang. Through Taiyang, we raise, process and market ducks and duck related food products through three business lines:

	o	Breeding Unit – breeds, hatches, and cultivates ducklings for resale and processing by Food Processing Unit
	o	Feed Unit – produces duck feed for internal use and external sale
	o	Food Processing Unit – processes ducklings into frozen raw food product for commercial resale.

All of the business operations are in Ninnguo City, located in the province of Anhui, in southern-central China.

Corporate Structure

Our organizational structure was carefully developed to abide by the laws of the PRC and maintain tax benefits as well as internal organizational efficiencies. Our organizational structure is summarized in the figure below:

We had revenues of $41,684,988 and $28,859,699 and generated net income of $3,395,524and $2,489,323 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, we had revenues of $ 7,159,083 and $ 23,221,725 , respectively, and generated net (loss)/ income of ($321,764) and $1,745,481 , respectively . We had a working capital deficit of $3,867,880at September 30, 2011, primarily as a result of approximately $13.5 million in current loans payable and $2.8 million in accounts payable.

Our principal offices are located at No. 88, Eastern Outer Ring Road, Ningguo City, Anhui Province, 242300, People’s Republic of China, and our telephone number is (+86) 0563-430-9999. We are a Delaware corporation.

The Offering

Common stock offered by the selling stockholders	Up to 6,627,696 shares of common stock, including the following:

		- 5,485,300 shares of common stock, and - up to 1,142,396 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of common stock purchase warrants at an exercise price of $4.00 per share (includes a good faith estimate of the shares underlying warrants to account for antidilution protection adjustments).

Common stock to be outstanding after the offering	Up to 11,582,429 shares.

Use of proceeds	We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock. However, we will receive the sale price of any common stock we sell to the selling stockholders upon exercise of the warrants. We expect to use the proceeds received from the exercise of the warrants, if any, for general working capital purposes.

OTCBB symbol	DUKS

The above information regarding common stock to be outstanding after the offering is based on 10,440,033 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 9, 2012 and includes the 1,142,396 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of all warrants outstanding as of January 9, 2012 registered pursuant to the registration statement that this prospectus is part of.

Unless otherwise indicated, all share amounts and prices give effect to the 1-for-3 reverse stock split of our common stock, which was effective on June 1, 2010.

The following is a summary of the transactions relating to the securities being registered hereunder.

Reverse Merger Transaction

On November 10, 2010, we executed and consummated a share exchange agreement by and among Dynamic and the stockholders of 100% of Dynamic common stock, on the one hand, and us and certain holders of our issued and outstanding common stock on the other hand. In connection with the share exchange agreement, we granted piggyback registration rights to our existing stockholders, of which an aggregate of 314,347 shares are included in this prospectus.

November 2010 Private Placement

In November 2010, we sold to certain investors (the “Old Purchasers”) units (the “Old Units”) for aggregate cash gross proceeds of $5,107,472, at a price of $8.00 per Unit and the exchange of $549,984 in previously issued debentures that were converted into Units at a price of $6.00 per Unit (the “Old Financing”). Each Old Unit consists of four (4) shares of Common Stock and a warrant to purchase one (1) share (the “Old Warrants”).

Pursuant to a placement agent agreement with Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. (“Laidlaw”), dated as of February 8, 2010, Laidlaw received (i) a cash payment equal to 8% of the gross proceeds delivered by investors in the Old Financing and (ii) five-year placement agent warrants to acquire 226,298 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $4.00 per share. The placement agent warrants may be exercised on a cashless exercise basis.

Pursuant to the Old Warrants, no holder may exercise such holder’s Old Warrant if such exercise would result in the holder beneficially owning in excess of 4.9% of our then issued and outstanding common stock. A holder may, however, increase or decrease this limitation (but in no event exceed 9.99% of the number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding) by providing us with 61 days’ notice that such holder wishes to increase or decrease this limitation.

On November 10, 2010 we entered into a registration rights agreement with the Old Purchasers, under which we agreed to prepare and file with the SEC and maintain the effectiveness of a “resale” registration statement providing for the resale of (i) all of the shares of Common Stock (ii) all of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Old Warrants, (iii) all of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued to Laidlaw; (iv) any additional shares issuable in connection with any anti-dilution provisions associated with such Old Warrants, and (v) any securities issued or issuable upon any stock split, dividend or other distribution, recapitalization or similar event with respect to the foregoing (collectively, the “Old Registrable Securities”).

Under the terms of the registration rights agreement, we were required to have a registration statement filed with the SEC by January 9, 2011, and declared effective by the SEC not later than March 10, 2011. We are required to pay liquidated damages to each Old Purchaser in an amount equal to 1% of the Old Purchaser’s purchase price paid for any Old Registrable Securities then held by the Old Purchaser for the first thirty (30) calendar days past the relevant deadline that the registration statement is not filed or not declared effective, for any period that we fail to keep the registration statement effective. The liquidated damages increases to 2% of the Old Purchaser’s purchase price for any Old Registrable Securities held after the first thirty (30) calendar day period thereafter, subject to a maximum payment of 10% of the Old Purchaser’s purchase price paid. We have accrued the maximum amount of liquidated damages of 10% to the Old Purchasers.

On November 10, 2010 and in connection with the Old Financing , we entered into a Performance Milestone Shares Escrow Agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”) with Laidlaw, on behalf of the Old Purchasers, and Firm Success International, Ltd., our largest shareholder (“Firm Success”), pursuant to which Firm Success agreed to deposit and pledge 1,466,097 shares of our common stock into an escrow account (the “Pledged Shares”), which Pledged Shares represented 30% of Firm Success’ shares, as security for our achieving Adjusted Net Income (as hereinafter defined) of not less than $6,936,889 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 (the “Target Income”). “Adjusted Net Income” means net income for the year ending December 31, 2010, as reported in our audited financial statements, as filed with the SEC, plus (a) stock based compensation charges associated with closing the Share Exchange and the private placement offering, and (b) cash charges related to the Share Exchange and the private placement offering, which (b) shall not exceed $705,000 in the aggregate.

As the Old Financing was being done in connection with the reverse merger transaction, there was no established market to value our Common Stock. As a result, in support of our valuation, we determined the Target Income we anticipated to achieve for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. As a result of negotiations between us and Laidlaw, it was agreed that Firm Success would pledge 30% of its shares, as a guarantee to the Old Purchasers that we would achieve the Target Income, which supported our valuation in the Old Financing. It was agreed to by the parties that a pledge of Firm Success’ shares was preferable than a make-good provision of additional shares from our company, as we wanted to reduce the potential dilution if the Target Income was not met.

In April 2011, the Pledged Shares were released from the pledge and returned to Firm Success subsequent to filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December, 31, 2010, as the Target Income was achieved. On November 11, 2011, we filed an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December, 31, 2010 , pursuant to which the Adjusted Net Income fell below the Target Income. Accordingly, the Pledged Shares are due to be distributed from Firm Success pro rata to the holders of the Old Units.

March 2011 Private Placement

In March 2011, we sold to certain investors (the “New Purchasers”) units (the “New Units”) for aggregate cash gross proceeds of $1,150,000, at a price of $8.00 per Unit (the “New Financing”). Each New Unit consists of four (4) shares of Common Stock and a warrant to purchase one (1) share (the “New Warrants”).

Pursuant to a placement agent agreement with Corinthian Partners, L.L.C. (“Corinthian”), Corinthian received (i) a cash payment equal to 8% of the gross proceeds delivered by investors in the New Financing and (ii) five-year placement agent warrants to acquire 46,000 shares of Common Stock, at an exercise price of $4.00 per share. The placement agent warrants may be exercised on a cashless exercise basis.

Pursuant to the New Warrants, no holder may exercise such holder’s New Warrant if such exercise would result in the holder beneficially owning in excess of 4.9% of our then issued and outstanding common stock. A holder may, however, increase or decrease this limitation (but in no event exceed 9.99% of the number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding) by providing us with 61 days’ notice that such holder wishes to increase or decrease this limitation.

On March 7, 2011 we entered into a registration rights agreement with the New Purchasers, under which we agreed to prepare and file with the SEC and maintain the effectiveness of a “resale” registration statement providing for the resale of (i) all of the shares of Common Stock (ii) all of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the New Warrants, (iii) all of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants issued to Corinthian; (iv) any additional shares issuable in connection with any anti-dilution provisions associated with such New Warrants, and (v) any securities issued or issuable upon any stock split, dividend or other distribution, recapitalization or similar event with respect to the foregoing (collectively, the “New Registrable Securities”). Under the terms of the registration rights agreement, we were required to have a registration statement filed with the SEC by May 6, 2011, and declared effective by the SEC not later than September 3 , 2011. We are required to pay liquidated damages to each New Purchaser in an amount equal to 1% of the New Purchaser’s purchase price paid for any New Registrable Securities then held by the New Purchaser for the first thirty (30) calendar days past the relevant deadline that the registration statement is not filed or not declared effective, for any period that we fail to keep the registration statement effective. The liquidated damages increases to 2% of the New Purchaser’s purchase price for any New Registrable Securities held after the first thirty (30) calendar day period thereafter, subject to a maximum payment of 10% of the New Purchaser’s purchase price paid. As of December 19, 2011, we have accrued liquidated damages in the amount of approximately $55,000 related to this financing, which is the maximum amount of liquidated damages to be paid. As of September 30, 2011, we had not accrued any liability related to these liquidated damages because the ultimate amount of the liquidated damages was not reasonably determinable at the time those financial statements were issued. The maximum amount of such liquidated damages pursuant to the registration rights agreement is $115,000. If the registration statement was declared effective as of January 9, 2012, we would owe liquidated damages to the investors in the amount of $85,867 .

RISK FACTORS

This investment has a high degree of risk. Before you invest you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this prospectus. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed and the value of our stock could go down. This means you could lose all or a part of your investment.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We may be unable to sustain our past growth or manage our future growth, which may have a material adverse effect on our future operating results.

We have generally experienced growth since our inception, and realized revenues of approximately $41.7 million and $28.9 million in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $23.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, develop new products, enhance our technological capabilities, satisfy customer requirements, execute our business plan or respond to competitive pressures. To effectively manage growth, we need to:

	·	Hire, train, integrate and manage additional qualified technicians and breeding farm directors and sales and marketing personnel;
	·	Implement additional, and improve existing, administrative, financial and operations systems, procedures and controls;
	·	Continue to enhance manufacturing and customer resource management systems;
	·	Continue to expand and upgrade our feed ingredient composition, poultry immunization system and breeding technology;
	·	Manage multiple relationships with distributors, suppliers and certain other third parties; and
	·	Manage our financial condition.

Our success also depends largely on our ability to anticipate and respond to expected changes in future demand for our products, and our ducks’ performance and disease resistance ability. If the timing of our expansion does not match market demand, our business strategy may need to be revised. If we over-expand and demand for our products does not increase as we may have projected, our financial results will be materially and adversely affected. However, if we do not expand, and demand for our products increases sharply, our business could be seriously harmed because we may not be as cost-effective as our competitors due to our inability to take advantage of increased economies of scale. In addition, we may not be able to satisfy the needs of current customers or attract new customers, and we may lose credibility and our relationships with our customers may be negatively affected. Moreover, if we do not properly allocate our resources in line with future demand for our products, we may miss changing market opportunities and our business and financial results could be materially and adversely affected. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully manage our growth in the future.

Outbreaks of poultry disease, such as avian influenza, or the perception that outbreaks may occur, can significantly restrict our ability to conduct our operations.

Taiyang takes precautions to ensure that its flocks are healthy and that its production facilities operate in a sanitary and environmentally sound manner. While Taiyang has ability and experience in product quality improvement as well as poultry disease resistance, events beyond its control, such as the outbreak of avian influenza in 2006, may restrict its ability to conduct its operations and sales. An outbreak of disease could result in governmental restrictions on the import and export of products from Taiyang’s customers, or require it to destroy one or more of its flocks. This could result in the cancellation of orders by its customers and create adverse publicity that may have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and prospects.

Worldwide fears about avian diseases, such as avian influenza, have depressed, and may continue to adversely impact, Taiyang’s sales. Avian influenza is a respiratory disease of birds. The milder forms occur occasionally around the world. Recently, there has been substantial publicity regarding a highly pathogenic strain of avian influenza, known as H5N1, which has affected Asia since 2002. It is widely believed that H5N1 is spread by migratory birds, such as ducks and geese. There have also been some cases where H5N1 is believed to have passed from birds to humans as humans came into contact with live birds that were infected with the disease. Although there are vaccines available for H5N1 and other forms of avian influenza, and the PRC government mandates, and Taiyang vaccinates its breeding stock against avian influenza, there is no guarantee that the disease can be completely prevented as the virus continues to mutate. Taiyang’s livestock have never been infected with avian influenza. Taiyang is required to maintain an immunization permit on an annual basis issued by the provincial Animal Husbandry Bureau.

Taiyang does not typically have long-term purchase contracts with its customers and its customers have in the past and could at any time in the future, reduce or cease purchasing products from them, harming our operating results and business.

Taiyang typically does not have long-term volume purchase contracts with their customers, and they are not obligated to purchase products from Taiyang. Accordingly, their customers could at any time reduce their purchases from Taiyang or cease purchasing their products altogether. In addition, any decline in demand for Taiyang’s products and any other negative development affecting its major customers or the poultry industry in general, would likely harm our results of operations. For example, if any of Taiyang’s customers experience serious financial difficulties, it may lead to a decline in sales of Taiyang’s products to such customer and our operating results could be harmed through, among other things, decreased sales volumes and write-offs of accounts receivable related to sales to such customer.

Competition in the poultry industry with other poultry companies, especially companies with greater resources, may make us unable to compete successfully, which could adversely affect our business.

The Chinese poultry industry is highly competitive. In general, competitive factors in the Chinese duck industry include price, product quality, brand identification, breadth of product line and customer service. Taiyang’s success depends in part on its ability to manage costs and be efficient in the highly competitive poultry industry. Many of Taiyang’s competitors have greater financial and marketing resources. Because of this, we may not be able to successfully increase Taiyang’s market penetration or Taiyang’s overall share of the poultry market.

Increased competition may result in price reductions, increased sales incentive offerings, lower gross margins, sales expenses, marketing programs and expenditures to expand channels to market. Taiyang’s competitors may offer products with better market acceptance, better price or better quality. We may be adversely affected if Taiyang is unable to maintain current product cost reductions, or achieve future product cost reductions.

Taiyang competes against a number of other suppliers of ducks. Although it attempts to develop and support high-quality products that its customers demand, products developed by competing suppliers could render its products noncompetitive. If Taiyang fails to address these competitive challenges, there could be a material adverse effect upon our business, consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

Taiyang derives a significant portion of its revenues from a single distributor, the loss of which would significantly reduce Taiyang’s revenues and may impair its ability to operate profitably.

Taiyang has derived, and believes that it will continue to derive, a significant portion of its revenues from a single distributor, Yu Qigui. Revenue from Taiyang’s Feed Unit, which was $13.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, was almost exclusively a result of sales to this distributor. As a result, to the extent that such distributor continues to accounts for a large percentage of Taiyang’s revenue, the loss of this distributor could materially affect Taiyang’s ability to operate profitably. Since Yu Qigui accounted for approximately 33% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010, the loss of this distributor would have a material adverse effect upon Taiyang’s business and may impair its ability to operate profitably.

Taiyang anticipates that this primary dependence on a single distributor will continue for the foreseeable future. There is a risk that the existing distributor will elect not to do business with us in the future or will experience financial difficulties. Furthermore, this distributor could experience financial difficulties, business reverses or the loss of orders or anticipated orders which reduces or eliminates the need for the products that it orders from Taiyang. If Taiyang does not develop relationships with new distributors, it may not be able to increase, or even maintain, its revenue, and its financial condition, results of operations, business and/or prospects may be materially adversely affected.

If demand for Taiyang’s products declines in the markets that it serves, its selling prices and overall sales will decrease. Even if the demand for its products increases, when such increase cannot outgrow the decrease in its selling price, our overall sales revenues may decrease.

Demand for Taiyang’s products is affected by a number of factors, including the general demand for the products in the end markets that it serves and the price attractiveness. A vast majority of its sales are derived directly or indirectly from end users who are duck raisers and large integrated duck companies whose duck seedling production is not sufficient for their own use. Any significant decrease in the demand for ducks may result in a decrease in Taiyang’s revenues and earnings. A variety of factors, including economic, health, regulatory, political and social instability, could contribute to a slowdown in the demand for ducks because demand for duck is highly correlated with general economic activities. As a result, even if the demand for Taiyang’s products increases, when the increase of demand cannot outgrow the decrease of selling price, our overall sales revenues may decrease.

Industry cyclicality can affect our earnings, especially due to fluctuations in commodity prices of feed ingredients and breeding stock.

Currently, all Taiyang’s raw materials are domestically procured. Profitability in the poultry industry is materially affected by the supply of parent breeding stocks and the commodity prices of feed ingredients, including corn, soybean cake, and other nutrition ingredients from numerous sources, mainly from wholesalers who collect the feed ingredients directly from farmers. As a result, the poultry industry is subject to wide fluctuations and cycles. These prices are determined by supply and demand factors. Prices for raw materials have been volatile in recent years. For instance, our average unit price for corn, one of our principal raw materials, increased from approximately $0.18 (RMB 1.44) per kilogram in 2006 to approximately $0.30 (RMB 1.97) per kilogram in 2011, showing an increase of 67%. Historically, Taiyang’s financial results have improved when duck prices are high and feed prices are low and feed ingredients are in adequate supply. However, it is very difficult to predict when feed price spiral cycles will occur.

Various factors can affect the supply of corn and soybean meal, which are the primary ingredients of the feed Taiyang uses for parent breeding stocks. In particular, weather patterns, the level of supply inventories and demand for feed ingredients, and the agricultural policies of the Chinese government affect the supply of feed ingredients. Weather patterns often change agricultural conditions in an unpredictable manner. A sudden and significant change in weather patterns could affect supplies of feed ingredients, as well as both the industry’s and Taiyang’s ability to obtain feed ingredients, grow ducks or deliver products. Increases in the prices of feed ingredients will result in increases in raw material costs and operating costs.

Increased water, energy and gas costs would increase Taiyang’s expenses and reduce its profitability.

Taiyang requires a substantial amount, and as it expands its business it will require additional amounts, of water, electricity and natural gas to produce and process its duck products. The prices of water, electricity and natural gas fluctuate significantly over time. One of the primary competitive factors in the Chinese duck market is price, and it may not be able to pass on increased costs of production to its customers. As a result, increases in the cost of water, electricity or natural gas could substantially harm our business and results of operations.

Taiyang’s products might contain undetected defects that are not discovered until after shipping.

Although Taiyang has strict quality control over its products and it produces high-quality ducks supported by its know-how in feed ingredient composition, immunization system and breeding techniques gained through many years of business and continuous research and development, its products may contain undetected problems. Problems could result in a loss or delay in market acceptance of its products and thus harm our reputation and revenues.

The loss of key personnel or the failure to attract or retain specialized technical and management personnel could impair our ability to grow our business.

We rely heavily on the services of our key employees, including Wu Qiyou, our founder, Chief Executive Officer, and chairman of our board of directors. In addition, our engineers and other key technical personnel are a significant asset and are the source of Taiyang’s technological and product innovations. Taiyang depends substantially on the leadership of a small number of farm directors and technicians who are devoted to research and development. Additionally, all of Taiyang’s packaged food products, accounting for approximately 36% and 73% of our revenue in 2009 and 2010, respectively, are sold through third party distributors. The loss of these distributors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We believe Taiyang’s future success will depend upon its ability to retain these key employees and sales distributors. We may not be successful in attracting and retaining sufficient numbers of technical personnel to support Taiyang’s anticipated growth. Despite the incentives we provide, our current employees may not continue to work for Taiyang, and if additional personnel are required for Taiyang’s operations, we may not be able to obtain the services of additional personnel necessary for Taiyang’s growth. In addition, we do not maintain “key person” life insurance for any of Taiyang’s senior management or other key employees. The loss of the key employees or the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel, including technicians, could delay the development and introduction of, and have an adverse effect on Taiyang’s ability to sell, its products, as well as its overall growth.

In addition, if any other members of Taiyang’s senior management or any of its other key personnel join a competitor or form a competing company, we may not be able to replace them easily and we may lose customers, business partners, key professionals and staff members.

We have made inter-enterprise loans that may be in violation of PRC lending regulations.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had outstanding $3,404,577, $4,268,057 and $2,816,943, respectively, of unsecured loans receivable from unrelated parties. These loans, and other loans made by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 that were repaid prior to the end of the respective reporting period, constitute inter-enterprise lending that violate the PRC General Lending Rules. A fine in the amount of one to three times the income generated by the Company from such inter-enterprise loans may be imposed by the People’s Bank of China, at their discretion, if the Company were found to be in violation of the PRC General Lending Rules. We estimate the range of potential fines to be between approximately $560,000, and $1,670,000 based on the guidelines established by PRC General Lending Rules, but such fines are levied discretion of the People’s Bank of China. In the opinion of management after discussion with its Chinese legal counsel, the probability of the fine being imposed is low.

We do not have any registered patents or other registered intellectual property on our production processes and we may not be able to maintain the confidentiality of our processes.

While we have four design patents relating to package bags for our products, we have no patents or registered intellectual property covering our production processes and we rely on the confidentiality of our production processes in producing a competitive product. The confidentiality of our know-how may not be maintained and we may lose any meaningful competitive advantage which might arise through our proprietary processes. Due to the lack of such protection, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary production technology. Monitoring unauthorized use of our production process is difficult, particularly in China. This may have a material adverse effect on our competitive advantage.

We do not presently maintain product liability insurance, and our property and equipment insurance does not cover the full value of our property and equipment, which leaves us with exposure in the event of loss or damage to our properties or claims filed against us.

We currently do not carry any product liability or other similar insurance. Unlike the U.S. and other countries, product liability claims and lawsuits are extremely rare in the PRC. However, we cannot guarantee that we would not face liability in the event of any problems with our products, including disease or contamination. We cannot assure you that, especially as China’s domestic consumer economy and industrial economy continues to expand, product liability exposures and litigation will not become more commonplace in the PRC, or that we will not face product liability exposure or actual liability if we expand our sales into international markets, like the United States, where product liability claims are more prevalent, although we currently do not have any plans to expand our operations into the United States or international markets.

Except for property and automobile insurance, we do not have other insurance such as business liability or disruption insurance coverage for our operations in the PRC.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR CORPORATE STRUCTURE

We conduct our business through Taiyang by means of contractual arrangements. If the Chinese government determines that these contractual arrangements do not comply with applicable regulations, our business could be adversely affected. If the PRC regulatory bodies determine that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our business in China do not comply with PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment, we could be subject to severe penalties. In addition, changes in such Chinese laws and regulations may materially and adversely affect our business.

There are uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws, rules and regulations, including but not limited to the laws, rules and regulations governing the validity and enforcement of the contractual arrangements between Ningguo and Taiyang. Although we have been advised by our PRC counsel, that based on their understanding of the current PRC laws, rules and regulations, the structure for operating our business in China (including our corporate structure and contractual arrangements with Taiyang and its owners) comply with all applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations, and do not violate, breach, contravene or otherwise conflict with any applicable PRC laws, rules or regulations, we cannot assure you that the PRC regulatory authorities will not determine that our corporate structure and contractual arrangements violate PRC laws, rules or regulations. If the PRC regulatory authorities determine that our contractual arrangements are in violation of applicable PRC laws, rules or regulations, our contractual arrangements will become invalid or unenforceable. In addition, new PRC laws, rules and regulations may be introduced from time to time to impose additional requirements that may be applicable to our contractual arrangements. For example, the PRC Property Rights Law that became effective on October 1, 2007 may require us to register with the relevant government authority the security interests on the equity interests in Taiyang granted to us under the equity pledge agreements that are part of the contractual arrangements. If we are required to register such security interests, failure to complete such registration in a timely manner may result in such equity pledge agreements to be unenforceable against third party claims.

The Chinese government has broad discretion in dealing with violations of laws and regulations, including levying fines, revoking business and other licenses and requiring actions necessary for compliance. In particular, licenses and permits issued or granted to us by relevant governmental bodies may be revoked at a later time by higher regulatory bodies. We cannot predict the effect of the interpretation of existing or new Chinese laws or regulations on our businesses. We cannot assure you that our current ownership and operating structure would not be found in violation of any current or future Chinese laws or regulations. As a result, we may be subject to sanctions, including fines, and could be required to restructure our operations or cease to provide certain services. Any of these or similar actions could significantly disrupt our business operations or restrict us from conducting a substantial portion of our business operations, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If Ningguo or Taiyang are determined to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws, rules or regulations or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required governmental permits or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violations, including:

	·	revoking the business and operating licenses of our PRC consolidated entities;

	·	discontinuing or restricting the operations of our PRC consolidated entities;

	·	imposing conditions or requirements with which we or our PRC consolidated entities may not be able to comply;

	·	requiring us or our PRC consolidated entities to restructure the relevant ownership structure or operations;

	·	restricting or prohibiting our use of the proceeds from our initial public offering to finance our business and operations in China; or

	·	imposing fines.

The imposition of any of these penalties would severely disrupt our ability to conduct business and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our contractual arrangements with Taiyang and its owners may not be as effective in providing control over these entities as direct ownership.

We have no equity ownership interest in Taiyang, and rely on contractual arrangements to control and operate Taiyang and its businesses. These contractual arrangements may not be as effective in providing control over the company as direct ownership. For example, Taiyang could fail to take actions required for our business despite its contractual obligation to do so. If Taiyang fails to perform under its agreements with us, we may have to rely on legal remedies under Chinese law, which may not be effective. In addition, we cannot assure you that the owners of Taiyang will act in our best interests.

Because we rely on the consulting services agreement with Taiyang for our revenue, the termination of this agreement will severely and detrimentally affect our continuing business viability under our current corporate structure.

We are a holding company and do not have any assets or conduct any business operations other than the contractual arrangements between Ningguo, our wholly owned subsidiary, and Taiyang. As a result, we currently rely entirely for our revenues on dividends payments from Ningguo after it receives payments from Taiyang pursuant to the consulting services agreement which forms a part of the contractual arrangements. The consulting services agreement has an unlimited term and continues in full force and effect until terminated. The consulting services agreement may be terminated by written notice of Ningguo or Taiyang in the event that: (a) Taiyang causes a material breach of the agreement, provided that if the breach does not relate to a financial obligation of the breaching party, that party may attempt to remedy the breach following the receipt of the written notice; (b) one party becomes bankrupt, insolvent, is the subject of proceedings or arrangements for liquidation or dissolution, ceases to carry on business, or becomes unable to pay its debts as they become due; (c) Ningguo terminates its operations; or (d) circumstances arise which would materially and adversely affect the performance or the objectives of the agreement. Additionally, Ningguo may terminate the consulting services agreement without cause. Because neither we nor our direct and indirect subsidiaries own equity interests of Taiyang, the termination of the consulting services agreement would sever our ability to continue receiving payments from Taiyang under our current holding company structure. While we are currently not aware of any event or reason that may cause the consulting services agreement to terminate, we cannot assure you that such an event or reason will not occur in the future. In the event that the consulting services agreement is terminated, this may have a severe and detrimental effect on our continuing business viability under our current corporate structure, which in turn may affect the value of your investment.

We rely principally on dividends paid by our consolidated operating entity to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our consolidated PRC entities to pay dividends to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.

We are a holding company, and rely principally on dividends paid by our consolidated PRC operating entity for cash requirements, including the funds necessary to service any debt we may incur. In particular, we rely on earnings generated by Taiyang, which are passed on to us through Ningguo. If any of our consolidated operating subsidiaries incurs debt in its own name in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict dividends or other distributions on its equity interest to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require us to adjust our taxable income under the contractual arrangements Ningguo currently have in place with Taiyang, in a manner that would materially and adversely affect our ability to pay dividends and other distributions on our equity interest.

Furthermore, applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations permit payment of dividends by our consolidated PRC entity only out of its retained earnings, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards. Under PRC laws, rules and regulations, our consolidated PRC entities are required to set aside at least 10.0% of their after-tax profit based on PRC accounting standards each year to their statutory surplus reserve fund until the accumulative amount of such reserves reach 50.0% of their respective registered capital. As a result, our consolidated PRC entity is restricted in its ability to transfer a portion of its net income to us whether in the form of dividends, loans or advances. As of December 31, 2010, we had retained earnings of approximately $11.5 million, of which approximately $1.4 million were appropriated as statutory reserves. Our retained earnings are not distributable as cash dividends. Any limitation on the ability of our consolidated operating subsidiaries to pay dividends to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our businesses, pay dividends or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

Our Chief Executive Officer has potential conflicts of interest with us, which may adversely affect our business and your ability for recourse.

Mr. Wu Qiyou, our Chief Executive Officer, is also the Chairman of Taiyang and executive director of Ningguo. Conflicts of interests between their respective duties to us and Taiyang may arise. As our director and executive officer, Mr. Wu Qiyou has a duty of loyalty and care to us under U.S. and BVI law when there are any potential conflicts of interests between our company and Taiyang. We cannot assure you, however, that when conflicts of interest arise, Mr. Wu will act completely in our interests or that conflicts of interests will be resolved in our favor. For example, Mr. Wu may determine that it is in Taiyang’s interests to sever the contractual arrangements with Ningguo, irrespective of the effect such action may have on us. In addition, Mr. Wu could violate his legal duties by diverting business opportunities from us to others, thereby affecting the amount of payment that Taiyang is obligated to remit to us under the consulting services agreement.

In the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the securities laws or otherwise as a result of any one of the circumstances described above, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against Taiyang or our officers or directors who are members of Taiyang’s management, all of whom reside within China. Even if you are successful in bringing an action, the laws of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against the assets of Taiyang and its management, all of which are located in China.

RISKS RELATED TO DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA

Taiyang is subject to restrictions on making payments to us.

We are a holding company incorporated in Delaware and do not have any assets or conduct any business operations other than our indirect investments in Taiyang. As a result of the holding company structure, we rely entirely on payments from Taiyang under the contractual arrangements with Ningguo. The Chinese government also imposes controls on the conversion of RMB into foreign currencies and the remittance of currencies out of China. We may experience difficulties in completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency. See “Government control of currency conversion may affect the value of your investment.” Furthermore, if our affiliated entity in China incurs debt on their own in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to make payments. If we are unable to receive all of the revenues from our operations through these contractual arrangements, we may be unable to pay dividends on our common stock.

Labor laws in the PRC may adversely affect our results of operations.

On January 1, 2008, the PRC government promulgated the Labor Contract Law of the PRC, or the New Labor Contract Law. The New Labor Contract Law imposes greater liabilities on employers and significantly impacts the cost of an employer’s decision to reduce its workforce. Further, it requires certain terminations to be based upon seniority and not merit. In the event we decide to significantly change or decrease our workforce, the New Labor Contract Law could adversely affect our ability to enact such changes in a manner that is most advantageous to our business or in a timely and cost effective manner, thus materially and adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to government regulations and any change in these regulations, or the possible retroactive application of these regulations could result in additional tax liability.

Pursuant to PRC law, full-time employees are entitled to staff welfare benefits including medical care, welfare subsidies, unemployment insurance, and pension benefits through a PRC government-mandated multiemployer pension plan. We are required to contribute a portion of the employees’ salaries to the retirement benefit scheme to fund the benefits, of which, the government reserves right to change rates retroactively. In the event that the government decides to increase the amount we are required to contribute or applies such a change retroactively, we would have to reduce our capital for working capital purposes and incur charges to our earnings that could be material.

Various tax laws may result in additional tax liabilities.

Tax declarations, together with other legal compliance areas, such as customs and currency controls, are subject to review and investigation by various agencies and authorities, who are enabled by law to impose very severe fines, penalties and interest charges. These facts create tax risks in PRC substantially more significant than typically found in countries with more developed tax systems and structures. Various tax authorities could take differing positions on interpretive issues and the effect could be significant. The fact that a year has been reviewed does not close that year, or any tax declaration applicable to that year, from future review and assessment by tax authorities. If taxing authorities determine that there is an underpayment of taxes, they could impose a penalty between zero and five times the amount of taxes payable, at their discretion. If that should occur, we could incur significant penalties, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Because our assets are located overseas, shareholders may not receive distributions that they would otherwise be entitled to if we were declared bankrupt or insolvent.

Because substantially all of our assets are located in the PRC, they may be outside of the jurisdiction of U.S. courts to administer if we are the subject of an insolvency or bankruptcy proceeding. As a result, if we declared bankruptcy or insolvency, our shareholders may not receive the distributions on liquidation that they would otherwise be entitled to if our assets were to be located within the U.S., under U.S. Bankruptcy law.

Adverse changes in economic and political policies of the PRC government could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China, which could adversely affect our business.

All of our business operations are currently conducted in the PRC, under the jurisdiction of the PRC government. Accordingly, our results of operations, financial condition and prospects are subject to a significant degree to economic, political and legal developments in China. China’s economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including with respect to the amount of government involvement, level of development, growth rate, and control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth in the past 20 years, growth has been uneven across different regions and among various economic sectors of China. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic development and guide the allocation of resources. Some of these measures benefit the overall PRC economy, but may also have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are applicable to us. Since early 2004, the PRC government has implemented certain measures to control the pace of economic growth. Such measures may cause a decrease in the level of economic activity in China, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Unprecedented rapid economic growth in China may increase our costs of doing business, and may negatively impact our profit margins and/or profitability.

Our business depends in part upon the availability of relatively low-cost labor and materials. Rising wages in China may increase our overall costs of production. In addition, rising raw material costs, due to strong demand and greater scarcity, may increase our overall costs of production. If we are not able to pass these costs on to our customers in the form of higher prices, our profit margins and/or profitability could decline.

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited, because our subsidiaries are incorporated in non-U.S. jurisdictions, we conduct substantially all of our operations in China, and most of our officers reside outside the United States.

Although we are incorporated in Delaware, all of our business operations are conducted in China by Taiyang. Most of our officers and directors reside in China and some or all of the assets of those persons are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in China in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the PRC may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.

As a result of all of the above, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests through actions against our management, directors or major shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation doing business entirely within the United States.

Governmental control of currency conversion may affect the value of your investment.

The Chinese government imposes controls on the convertibility of RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive substantially all of our revenues in RMB. Under our current structure, our income is primarily derived from payments from Taiyang. Shortages in the availability of foreign currency may restrict the ability of our Chinese subsidiaries and our affiliated entity to remit sufficient foreign currency to pay dividends or other payments to us, or otherwise satisfy their foreign currency denominated obligations. Under existing Chinese foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from China State Administration of Foreign Exchange by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from appropriate government authorities is required where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of bank loans denominated in foreign currencies. The Chinese government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currency to satisfy our currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our stockholders.

Fluctuation in the value of RMB may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

The value of RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions. Our revenues and costs are mostly denominated in RMB, while a significant portion of our financial assets are denominated in U.S. dollars. We rely entirely on fees paid to us by our affiliated entity in China. Any significant fluctuation in the value of RMB may materially and adversely affect our cash flows, revenues, earnings and financial position, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, our stock in U.S. dollars. For example, an appreciation of RMB against the U.S. dollar would make any new RMB denominated investments or expenditures more costly to us, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into RMB for such purposes. An appreciation of RMB against the U.S. dollar would also result in foreign currency translation losses for financial reporting purposes when we translate our U.S. dollar denominated financial assets into RMB, as RMB is our reporting currency.

Dividends we receive from our subsidiary located in the PRC may be subject to PRC withholding tax.

The recently enacted PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the EIT Law, and the implementation regulations for the EIT Law issued by the PRC State Council, became effective as of January 1, 2008. The EIT Law provides that a maximum income tax rate of 20% is applicable to dividends payable to non-PRC investors that are “non-resident enterprises,” to the extent such dividends are derived from sources within the PRC, and the State Council has reduced such rate to 10% through the implementation regulations. We are a Delaware holding company and substantially all of our income is derived from the operations of Taiyang located in the PRC, which is contractually obligated to pay its quarterly profits to our WFOE. Therefore, dividends paid to us by our WFOE in China may be subject to the 10% income tax if we are considered as a “non-resident enterprise” under the EIT Law. We believe that we will be considered a non-resident enterprise. If we are required under the EIT Law and its implementation regulations to pay income tax for any dividends we receive from our WFOE, it may have a material and adverse effect on our net income and materially reduce the amount of dividends, if any, we may pay to our shareholders.

Governmental control of currency conversion may affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive all our revenues in RMB. Under our current corporate structure, our income is primarily derived from dividend payments from our WFOE. Shortages in the availability of foreign currency may restrict the ability of our WFOE to remit sufficient foreign currency to pay dividends or other payments to us, or otherwise satisfy their foreign currency-denominated obligations. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade related transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from the SAFE or its local branch is required where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currency to satisfy our currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders.

The land on which our facilities are located could be subject to appropriation by the PRC government.

There is no private ownership of land in China. All land ownership is held by the government of the PRC, its agencies and collectives. Land use rights can be transferred upon approval by the land administrative authorities of the PRC (State Land Administration Bureau) upon payment of the required land transfer fee. We have acquired the land use rights for our facilities through 2055, however, under PRC law, land use rights can be revoked and the tenants forced to vacate at any time when re-development of the land is in the public interest. There is no assurance that the land use rights for this location will not be revoked.

We may have difficulty establishing adequate management, legal and financial controls in the PRC.

The PRC historically has not adopted a Western style of management and financial reporting concepts and practices, as in modern banking, computer and other control systems. Although we currently have over 500 employees in China, have not experienced difficulty to date in hiring qualified employees, and do not have any plans to hire a significant amount of employees or any significant employees in the near future, we may have difficulty in the future hiring and retaining a sufficient number of qualified employees to work in the PRC. As a result of these factors, we may experience difficulty in establishing management, legal and financial controls, collecting financial data and preparing financial statements, books of account and corporate records and instituting business practices that meet Western standards. Therefore, we may, in turn, experience difficulties in implementing and maintaining adequate internal controls as will be required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

There has been a limited trading market for our Common Stock and no market.

It is anticipated that there will be a limited trading market for the Common Stock on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. The lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your shares. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares of capital stock and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using Common Stock as consideration.

You may have difficulty trading and obtaining quotations for our Common Stock.

The Common Stock may not be actively traded, and the bid and asked prices for our Common Stock on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board may fluctuate widely. As a result, investors may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our securities. This severely limits the liquidity of the Common Stock, and would likely reduce the market price of our Common Stock and hamper our ability to raise additional capital.

The market price of our Common Stock may, and is likely to continue to be, highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations.

The market price of our Common Stock is likely to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors that are beyond our control, including:

	·	dilution caused by our issuance of additional shares of Common Stock and other forms of equity securities, which we expect to make in the Offering and in connection with future capital financings to fund our operations and growth, to attract and retain valuable personnel and in connection with future strategic partnerships with other companies;

	·	quarterly variations in our revenues and operating expenses;

	·	changes in the valuation of similarly situated companies, both in our industry and in other industries;

	·	changes in analysts’ estimates affecting our company, our competitors and/or our industry;

	·	changes in the accounting methods used in or otherwise affecting our industry;

	·	additions and departures of key personnel;

	·	announcements of technological innovations or new products available to the agricultural industry;

	·	announcements by relevant governments pertaining to incentives for agricultural development programs;

	·	fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of capital in the capital markets; and

	·	significant sales of our Common Stock, including sales by the investors following registration of the shares of Common Stock issued in this Offering and/or future investors in future offerings we expect to make to raise additional capital.

These and other factors are largely beyond our control, and the impact of these risks, singly or in the aggregate, may result in material adverse changes to the market price of our Common Stock and/or our results of operations and financial condition.

We do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We do not intend to declare dividends for the foreseeable future, as we anticipate that we will reinvest any future earnings in the development and growth of our business. Therefore, investors will not receive any funds unless they sell their Common Stock, and stockholders may be unable to sell their shares on favorable terms or at all. Investors cannot be assured of a positive return on investment or that they will not lose the entire amount of their investment in the Common Stock.

Our officers, directors and principal shareholders own a significant interest in our voting stock and Investors will not likely have any voice in our management.

Our officers, directors and principal shareholders, in the aggregate, will beneficially own or control the votes of approximately 48.2% of our outstanding Common Stock after the offering, assuming that all of the shares underlying the warrants registered herewith are sold. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, will likely have the ability to control substantially all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including:

	●	election of our board of directors;
	●	removal of any of our directors;
	●	amendment of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws; and
	●	adoption of measures that could delay or prevent a change in control or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination involving us.

As a result of their ownership and positions, our directors, executive officers and principal shareholders collectively are able to influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. In addition, sales of significant amounts of shares held by our directors, executive officers or principal shareholders, or the prospect of these sales, could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. Management’s stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over our stock price.

Our common stock is not currently traded at high volume, and you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to sell or liquidate a substantial number of shares at one time.

Our common stock is currently traded, but with very low, if any, volume, based on quotations on the “Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board”, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is still relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that trading levels will be sustained.

Shareholders should be aware that, according to Commission Release No. 34-29093, the market for “penny stocks” has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns or practices could increase the future volatility of our share price.

Legislative actions, higher insurance costs and potential new accounting pronouncements may impact our future financial position and results of operations.

There have been regulatory changes, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and there may potentially be new accounting pronouncements or additional regulatory rulings that will have an impact on our future financial position and results of operations. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other rule changes as well as proposed legislative initiatives following the Enron bankruptcy are likely to increase general and administrative costs and expenses. In addition, insurers are likely to increase premiums as a result of high claims rates over the past several years, which we expect will increase our premiums for insurance policies. Further, there could be changes in certain accounting rules. These and other potential changes could materially increase the expenses we report under generally accepted accounting principles, and adversely affect our operating results.

Efforts to comply with recently enacted changes in securities laws and regulations will increase our costs and require additional management resources, and we still may fail to comply.

As directed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on their internal controls over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K. In addition, in the event we are no longer a smaller reporting company, the independent registered public accounting firm auditing our financial statements would be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Such attestation requirement by our independent registered public accounting firm would not be applicable to us until the report for the year ended December 31, 2012 at the earliest, if at all. If we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting or if our independent registered public accounting firm is required to, but is unable to provide us with a report as to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of our securities.

Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:

	·	that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and
	·	the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

	·	obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
	·	make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

	·	sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
	·	that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock. However, we will receive the sale price of any common stock we sell to the selling stockholders upon exercise of the warrants. We expect to use the proceeds received from the exercise of the warrants, if any, for general working capital purposes.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “DUKS”. Prior to January 20, 2011, our common stock was quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “PKVG”. Prior to October 19, 2009, there was no public market for our common stock. Prior to January 2010, there were no trades in our common stock. For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of common stock. These prices represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

	Fiscal Year 2010
	High		Low
First Quarter	$	3.03	$	1.20
Second Quarter	$	12.00	$	2.50
Third Quarter	$	3.00	$	0.77
Fourth Quarter	$	3.00	$	0.70

	Fiscal Year 2011
	High		Low
First Quarter	$	3.00	$	1.50
Second Quarter	$	5.00	$	1.50
Third Quarter	$	2.00	$	1.50
Fourth Quarter	$	2.00	$	0.75

	Fiscal Year 2012
	High		Low
First Quarter (1)	$	1.35	$	0.75

(1)	As of January 9, 2012 .

HOLDERS

As of January 9, 2012 , we had approximately 115 holders of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is Corporate Stock Transfer Inc., 3200 Cherry Creek South Dr., Suite 430, Denver, Colorado 80209.

DIVIDENDS

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to stockholders in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deem relevant.

Equity Compensation Plans

None.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Some of the information in this Form S-1 contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate” and “continue,” or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they:

	•	discuss our future expectations;
	•	contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial condition; and
	•	state other “forward-looking” information.

We believe it is important to communicate our expectations. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or over which we have no control. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors,” “Business” and elsewhere in this prospectus. See “Risk Factors.”

Overview

We are a private breeder and seller of ducks and duck parts in the PRC. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Dynamic, was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands on March 2, 2010. Dynamic owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Ningguo. On May 26, 2010, Ningguo entered into a series of contractual agreements with Taiyang, in which Ningguo effectively assumed management of the business activities of Taiyang and has the right to appoint all executives and senior management and the members of the board of directors of Taiyang. The contractual arrangements are comprised of a series of agreements, including a Consulting Services Agreement and Operating Agreement, through which Ningguo has the right to advise, consult and manage Taiyang and its business operations for a quarterly consulting fee equal to all of Taiyang’s quarterly net profit. We will receive distributions from our consolidated affiliates only to the extent service fees are paid to Ningguo under these series of agreements and further distributed as dividends or other shareholder distributions by Ningguo. To secure payment of the service fees, Taiyang’s shareholders have pledged their rights, titles and equity interest in Taiyang as security for Ningguo to collect the consulting fee from Taiyang through an Equity Pledge Agreement. In order to further reinforce Ningguo’s rights to control and manage Taiyang, Taiyang’s shareholders have granted Ningguo the exclusive right to exercise their voting rights pursuant to a Voting Rights Proxy Agreement, as well as the exclusive right and option to acquire all of their equity interests in Taiyang through an Option Agreement.

Taiyang was established in May 1996 under the laws of the PRC. Taiyang raises, processes and markets ducks and duck related food products through three business lines:

	·	Breeding Unit – breeds, hatches, and cultivates ducklings for resale and processing by the Food Processing Unit;
	·	Feed Unit – produces duck feed for internal use and external sale; and
	·	Food Processing Unit – processes ducklings into frozen raw food product for commercial resale.

The contractual arrangements completed in May 2010 provide that Dynamic has a controlling interest in Taiyang as defined by FASB Accounting Standards Codification 810, “Consolidation”, Section 10-15, “Variable Interest Entities”, which requires Dynamic to consolidate the financial statements of Ningguo and Taiyang.

Accordingly, the financial statements reflect the consolidated financial results of Dynamic, Ningguo, and Taiyang.

For the Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

Revenues

Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $41,684,988 and $28,859,699, respectively. Revenues by business unit were as follows:

	2010		2009

Breeding Unit	$	12,592,738	$	7,704,942
Feed Unit		13,886,122		50,592
Food Unit		15,206,128		21,104,165

	$	41,684,988	$	28,859,699

Breeding Unit sales increased in 2010 compared with the same period of 2009, primarily as a result of higher demand and market prices for ducklings in China. Because we generate our own ducklings from our biological assets, the cost of producing new ducklings does not fluctuate with the market selling price for the ducklings. Accordingly, when the market price for ducklings increases, we maximize our profits by selling internally generated ducklings directly into the market, as opposed to using them as inputs for Food Unit products, since the market price of packaged Food Unit products does not fluctuate readily with the market price of the input ducklings. In 2010, one customer, Ji Chenghua, accounted for 36.7% and 11.1% of our Breeding Unit revenue and gross revenue, respectively.

The Feed Unit realized minimal sales in 2009 as products were primarily sold internally to the Breeding Unit. However, in 2010 we made significant sales of feed products to external customers through one distributor, Yu Qigui, who accounted for 99.5% and 33.1% of our Feed Unit revenue and gross revenue, respectively. We will continue to attempt to market our feed products to external customers, primarily through feed distributors, and expect that we will continue to realize sales revenue from such products. However, because distribution of these products is currently concentrated in one distributor, loss of that distributor would materially adversely affect such sales.

The Food Unit began its operations in 2008, and had significant sales in 2009 as sales and marketing efforts combined with lower market prices for ducklings. Food Unit sales were down in 2010 as compared with 2009 as a result of higher market prices for ducklings, which resulted in more ducklings sold to market instead of used for Food Unit products. In 2009 and 2010, one customer, Yao Ji, accounted for 39.3% and 57.1% of our Food Unit revenue, respectively and 14.3% and 41.8% of our gross revenue, respectively.

Revenues shown above reflect only sales to external customers. We also made substantial internal sales during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, as follows:

	Buying Unit
	Year Ended December 31, 2010						Year Ended December 31, 2009
	Breeding		Feed		Food		Breeding		Feed		Food
Selling Unit	Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit

Breeding Unit	$	—	$	—	$	218,016	$	—	$	—	$	—
Feed Unit		13,241,455		—		—		12,387,362		—		—
Food unit		—		8,681		—		51,137		—		—

	$	13,241,455	$	8,681	$	218,016	$	12,438,499	$	—	$	—

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, all of our sales were to customers located in the PRC. Our most significant intercompany sales are sales of feed product from the Feed Unit to the Breeding Unit.

Cost of goods sold and gross margin

Cost of goods sold for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $32,521,474 and $24,670,485, respectively. Cost of goods sold consists principally of the cost of grains and fees paid to subcontracted farmers to raise commercial ducklings. The cost of grains fluctuates due to market, political, and economic factors that are beyond our control. A dramatic increase in the price of grain could reduce profit margins and adversely affect our results of operations if we are unable to pass such increased costs on to customers. Gross margins on revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were 22% and 15%, respectively. The increased gross margin was primarily the result of increased sales and resulting gross margins in the Feed Unit, which had negligible external sales in 2009.

Sales and marketing expenses

Sales and marketing expenses for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $45,919 and $55,425, respectively. The slight decrease resulted from lower personnel and travel expenses in 2010.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $5,100,674 and $1,347,787, respectively, and are comprised of expenses related to corporate administration, accounting, and other shared corporate costs. General and administrative expenses were higher during 2010 due to (i) stock based compensation expense of in the amount of $2,081,122 recognized during 2010 related to shares issued in exchange for professional services, (ii) direct professional service expenses related to the Reverse Merger Transaction of $894,087 in 2010 compared with similar charges of only $148,750 in 2009, (iii) business tax of $265,509 in 2010, (iv) higher overhead costs in 2010 associated with corporate growth, and (v) more staffing for the public transaction and post-transaction accounting and administrative requirements.

Loss on change in fair value of derivative financial instruments

The warrants issued in our financing transactions completed in November 2010 do not meet all of the established criteria for equity classification in FASB ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, and accordingly, are recorded as derivative liabilities at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the warrants are charged or credited to income each period. During the year ended December 31, 2010, these charges amounted to $287,868. The charge is primarily a result of an increase in our stock price from $2.03 at November 10, 2010 to $2.50 at December 31, 2010, resulting in an increase in the fair value of derivative liabilities with an offsetting loss on the statement of operations.

Other income

In 2008, Taiyang began construction on an organic fertilizer manufacturing plant that it intended to complete in the second half of 2010. The fertilizer plant was to be used to process duck waste products into a saleable organic fertilizer product. In May 2009, Taiyang entered into an asset transfer agreement with an unrelated third party, whereby the buyer agreed to buy, and Taiyang agreed to sell, the fertilizer plant and related equipment, ground works, land rights, and intellectual property associated with the manufacturing process. The sale price for the sold assets (as valued using the exchange rate on the sale date) was $3,886,431, of which $2,048,371 was paid in June 2010, $1,010,851 (as valued using the exchange rate on the payment date) was paid in December 2010, and $889,174 (as valued using the exchange rate at December 31, 2010) was due by May 31, 2011 and has not yet been paid.

Taiyang recognized a gain on the sale of the fertilizer plant and related assets equal to the excess of the sale price over the carrying value of the sold assets, in the amount of $877,874.

Additionally, Taiyang previously wrote off an account receivable for the sale of a separate subsidiary with a sale price of $895,430 that was completed in 2005. During June 2010, Taiyang received payment for the prior account receivable. Accordingly, Taiyang recognized a gain from the collection of the account in this amount.

Subsidy income

From time to time, Taiyang receives subsidies from the PRC government. Subsidies used for current period expenditures are recognized as income in the period in which the benefit from the subsidy is realized by Taiyang. Certain of the subsidies are earmarked for particular capital improvement projects, and the completed projects must be approved by the government to ensure specifications were met. Subsidies that relate to depreciable property and equipment are recorded as an offset to the related capital accounts to which the subsidy relates.

Taiyang defers amounts received pursuant to capital subsidies until the projects are approved, at which time the deferred balances are recorded as an offset to the related capital accounts. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, deferred subsidy funds received were $Nil and $717,954, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Taiyang recognized subsidy income of $954,986 and $339,981, respectively. During 2009, Taiyang recorded capital subsidies in the amount of $1,853,557, which were offset against the cost of the capital assets acquired with the funds. Non-capital subsidies are comprised principally of grants from municipal government entities to stimulate what the government classifies as modern agricultural businesses. The funds are used for ongoing operational costs.

Interest expense

Interest expense (net) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:

	2010			2009

Interest income	$	(241,676	)	$	(73,680	)
Interest expense		1,473,696			536,573
Bank fees		137,175			77,598
Liquidated damages		562,746			—
Amortization of debt discount		108,786			9,291
Imputed interest expense		273,290			5,142

	$	2,314,017		$	554,924

Interest income is derived from interest earned on bank deposits, loans receivable, and cash and cash equivalents, and was lower in 2010 than 2009 due to lower average interest-bearing cash deposits in 2010 than in 2009. Interest expense relates to interest accrued on bank loans and credit facilities, and bank fees relating to cash accounts, and was higher in 2010 than in 2009 due to higher average bank loan balances in 2010 than in 2009. Taiyang also recognized amortization of discount on the face value of certain zero-interest loans with a stated maturity date. Imputed interest expense represents interest expense on zero interest debt with no maturity date.

Pursuant to the terms of the registration rights agreements dated November 10, 2010 and November 16, 2010, entered into between the Company and the investors in the November 2010 financing, the Company was required to file a registration statement including the shares issued in the November 2010 financing no later than January 9, 2011 and have such registration declared effective no later than May 9, 2011. The Company failed to file such registration statement, and as a result must accrue liquidated damages in the amount of 1% of the aggregate subscription amount for the first 30 days after the filing deadline, and 2% for each 30-day period thereafter, with a maximum penalty of 10% of the aggregate subscription amount. As of December 31, 2010, such accrued liquidated damages amounted to $562,746.

Income tax expense

Pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement between Taiyang and Ningguo, Taiyang pays a consulting service fee to Ninnguo that is equal to all of Taiyang’s net income. In turn, Taiyang pays all of its profits to Dynamic Ally.

According to the applicable PRC Enterprises Tax Law, income such as rental, royalty and profits from the PRC derived by a foreign enterprise which has no establishment in the PRC or has establishment but the income has no relationship with such establishment is subject to a 10% withholding tax on such income. Subsequent to the completion of the Reverse Merger Transaction, this income is subject to taxation at ordinary PRC corporate income tax rates of 25%. We recognized income tax expense amounting to $703,098 in the year ended December 31, 2010.

Net income

Net income for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $3,395,524 and $2,489,323, respectively. The higher income in 2010 was the result of (i) increased profit from the Food Unit as margins improved, (ii) external sales from the Feed Unit in 2010, where no external sales were made in 2009, (iii) a gain on the sale of the fertilizer plant in 2010 in the amount of $877,874, and (iv) a gain from the collection of an account previously written off in the amount of $895,430. These improvements were offset by (i) stock based compensation expense of in the amount of $2,081,122 recognized during 2010, (ii) higher general and administrative expense relating to implementation of the Reverse Merger Transaction, (iii) income and business tax expense in 2010 resulting from the contractual arrangements between Taiyang and Ningguo that were not in place in 2009, and (iv) higher interest expense as a result of liquidated damages, debt discount amortization, and higher debt balances in 2010. We intend to continue to market our Feed and Breeding Unit products to external customers, as well as to continue to expand our processed food products.

For the Nine Months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Revenues

Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $23,221,725 and $30,756,737, respectively. Revenues by business unit were as follows:

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2011		2010
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Breeding Unit	$	12,160,875	$	7,731,349
Feed Unit		4,300,871		9,352,996
Food Unit		6,759,979		13,672,392

	$	23,221,725	$	30,756,737

Breeding Unit sales increased substantially in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period of 2010, primarily as a result of higher demand and market prices for ducklings in China. Because we generate our own ducklings from our biological assets, the cost of producing new ducklings does not fluctuate with the market selling price for the ducklings. Therefore, when the market price for ducklings increases, we can maximize our profits per duckling by selling internally generated ducklings directly into the market, as opposed to using them as inputs for Food Unit products, since the market price of packaged Food Unit products does not fluctuate readily with the market price of the input ducklings. Accordingly, this strategy may result in lower revenues compared to prior periods, with a corresponding increase in gross profit. This is the case in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, when our consolidated revenues decreased by 7,535,012, or 24%, but we saw an overall increase in our gross profit of $339,009, or 6%, because of the increase in the market price of ducks. Our average sales price for a duckling was approximately $0.86 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $0.60 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Our average sales price for grown commercial processing ducks was approximately $1.15 per kilogram in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $0.94 per kilogram in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We expect our sales to continue to fluctuate with the market price of ducks, and we intend to continue to shift the uses of our ducklings between sales to market and internal use for food product to maximize our profits as the market conditions change.

In the last three fiscal quarters of 2010, we made significant sales of feed products to external customers through one distributor, while continuing to supply the Breed Unit. We did not make any sales to this distributor in the first fiscal quarter of 2011, but resumed sales in the second quarter of 2011. We will continue to attempt to market our feed products to external customers, primarily through feed distributors, and expect that we will continue to realize sales revenue from such products. However, because distribution of these products is currently concentrated in one distributor, sales are volatile, and the permanent loss of that distributor would materially adversely affect such sales.

Food Unit sales were down in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared with nine months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of higher market prices for ducklings, which resulted in more ducklings sold to market rather than being used internally for Food Unit products. When market prices of ducks is unusually high, on a consolidated basis we can make higher profits by selling ducks into the market rather than processing them into food products, which have a more stable market price, and thus will yield lower margins when the input costs increase. Because the total number of ducks produced by our Breeding Unit is fairly constant, we can maximize our profits by selling more live ducks when their market price is high, and by selling more food products when the market price of ducks is low. Accordingly, sales of Food Unit products decreased substantially from 2010 to 2011 as a larger portion of the ducks produced at our facility were sold directly by the Breeding Unit due to the higher market price in 2011 relative to 2010, rather than being processed and sold as food product.

Revenues shown above reflect only sales to external customers. We also made substantial internal sales during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, as follows:

	Buying Unit
	Nine months ended September 30, 2011						Nine months ended September 30, 2010
	Breeding		Feed		Food		Breeding		Feed		Food
Selling Unit	Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit

Breeding Unit	$	—	$	—	$	12,810	$	—	$	—	$	201,645
Feed Unit		9,654,959		—		—		10,962,657		—		—
Food unit		—		—		—		—		—		—

	$	9,654,959	$	—	$	12,810	$	10,962,657	$	—	$	201,645

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, all of our sales were to customers located in the PRC. Our most significant intercompany sales are sales of feed product from the Feed Unit to the Breeding Unit.

Cost of goods sold and gross margin

Cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $16,732,445 and $24,606,466, respectively. Cost of goods sold consists principally of the cost of grains and fees paid to subcontracted farmers to raise commercial ducklings. The cost of grains fluctuates due to market, political, and economic factors that are beyond our control. A dramatic increase in the price of grain could reduce profit margins and adversely affect our results of operations if we are unable to pass such increased costs on to customers. Gross margins on revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were 28% and 20%, respectively. The increased gross margin was primarily the result of increased sales prices of duck in 2011 relative to 2010, disproportionate to the relatively smaller increase in cost of grains and other materials used to raise ducks. As a result, margins on duck sales increased from 22% in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to 40% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Additionally, the amount of feed processed and sold to external customers decreased from 2010 to 2011, resulting in a gross decrease in cost of goods sold for the raw grains used to produce this externally sold feed product.

Sales and marketing expenses

Sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $28,631 and $33,683, respectively. The slight decrease resulted from lower expenses for personnel and travel in 2011.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $3,915,880 and $1,860,298, respectively, and are comprised of expenses related to corporate administration, accounting, and other shared corporate costs. General and administrative expenses were higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 due to reserves for estimated uncollectible accounts recorded against accounts receivable, loans receivable, prepayments, and sale price receivable in the amount of $1,245,233 in 2011, and increased wage and overhead costs associated with being public in 2011 of $810,496.

Gain on change in fair value of derivative financial instruments

The warrants issued in our financing transactions completed in November 2010 and March 2011 do not meet all of the established criteria for equity classification in FASB ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, and accordingly, are recorded as derivative liabilities at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the warrants are charged or credited to income each period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized income resulting from a decrease in the fair value of derivative financial instruments in the amount of $473,272. The gain is primarily a result of a decrease in our stock price from $2.50 at December 31, 2010 to $2.00 at September 30, 2011, resulting in a decrease in the fair value of derivative liabilities with an offsetting gain on the statement of operations.

Other income

Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $195,854 and $1,777,530, respectively.

In 2008, Taiyang began construction on an organic fertilizer manufacturing plant that it intended to complete in the second half of 2010. The fertilizer plant was to be used to process duck waste products into a saleable organic fertilizer product. In May 2010, Taiyang entered into an asset transfer agreement with an unrelated third party, whereby the buyer agreed to buy, and Taiyang agreed to sell, the fertilizer plant and related equipment, ground works, land rights, and intellectual property associated with the manufacturing process. Taiyang recognized a gain on the sale of the fertilizer plant and related assets equal to the excess of the sale price over the carrying value of the sold assets, in the amount of $877,874 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the PRC government reclaimed certain land that it was leasing to us on which our Breeding Center #2 was located. We recognized gain on disposal of the buildings associated with Duck Farm #2 and other assets disposed during the period in the amount of $19,735.

We earned dividend income of $185,533 on long term investments in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

We also recognized other non-operational expense (income) in the amount of $9,414 and ($4,226) in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Subsidy income

From time to time, we receive subsidies from the PRC government. Subsidies used for current period expenditures are recognized as income in the period in which the benefit from the subsidy is realized. Certain of the subsidies are earmarked for particular capital improvement projects, and the completed projects must be approved by the government to ensure specifications were met. Subsidies that relate to depreciable property and equipment are recorded as an offset to the related capital accounts to which the subsidy relates.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized subsidy income of $130,738 and $108,835, respectively.

Interest expense

Interest expense (net) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Interest income	$	(212,370	)	$	(2,721	)
Interest expense		1,186,918			1,174,398
Bank fees		52,919			110,903
Amortization of debt discount		14,235			104,455
Imputed interest expense		—			74,648

	$	1,041,702		$	1,461,683

Interest income is derived from interest earned on bank deposits, loans receivable, and cash and cash equivalents, and was higher in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 than the nine months ended September 30, 2010 due to higher average interest-bearing cash deposits and loans receivable in 2011 than in 2010. Interest expense relates to interest accrued on bank loans and credit facilities, and bank fees relating to cash accounts, and was similar to prior year. We also recognized interest expense to amortize discounts on the face value of certain zero-interest loans with a stated maturity date. Imputed interest expense represents interest expense on zero interest debt with no maturity date.

Income tax expense

Pursuant to the Consulting Services Agreement between Taiyang and Ningguo, Taiyang pays a consulting service fee to Ninnguo that is equal to all of Taiyang’s net income. According to the applicable PRC Enterprises Tax Law, such income is subject to enterprise income tax at a rate of 25%. We recognized income tax expense amounting to $853,192 and $267,294 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Income tax expense is higher in 2011 because the contractual arrangements between Ningguo and Taiyang that triggered income tax recognition at 25% did not come into effect until May 2010, so there was no income tax expense on income earned for the period from January to May 2010.

Net income

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $1,745,481 and $4,413,678, respectively. The lower income in 2011 was the result of (i) reserves for estimated uncollectible accounts recorded against accounts receivable, loans receivable, prepayments, and sale price receivable in the amount of $1,245,233 in 2011, (ii) higher other income of $1,581,676 in 2010 relating primarily to a gain on the sale of Taiyang’s fertilizer plant and the collection of a previously written off account receivable, (iii) increased wage and overhead costs associated with being public in 2011 of $810,496, and (iv) higher income tax expense of $585,898 in 2011 as a result of our contractual arrangements that came into effect in May 2010. These amounts were offset by (i) a gain on the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments in the amount of $473,272 in 2011, (ii) lower interest expense of $419,981 in 2011, and (iii) increased gross profit of $339,009 in 2011, resulting primarily from the Breeding Unit as margins improved due to higher market prices for ducks.

For the Three Months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $7,159,083 and $11,110,167, respectively. Revenues by business unit were as follows:

	Three months ended September 30,
	2011		2010
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Breeding Unit	$	3,498,117	$	4,134,491
Feed Unit		1,455,962		4,470,162
Food Unit		2,205,004		2,505,514

	$	7,159,083	$	11,110,167

Breeding Unit sales increased in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared with the same period of 2010, primarily as a result of higher demand and market prices for ducklings in China. Because we generate our own ducklings from our biological assets, the cost of producing new ducklings does not fluctuate with the market selling price for the ducklings. Therefore, when the market price for ducklings increases, we can maximize our profits per duckling by selling internally generated ducklings directly into the market, as opposed to using them as inputs for Food Unit products, since the market price of packaged Food Unit products does not fluctuate readily with the market price of the input ducklings. Accordingly, this strategy may result in lower revenues compared to prior periods, with a corresponding increase in gross profit. Despite a decrease of 15% in Breeding Unit sales, gross margin for this unit increased by 18% due to the increase in the market price of ducks. Our average sales price for a duckling was approximately $0.72 in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $0.47 in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Our average sales price for grown commercial processing ducks was approximately $1.04 per kilogram in the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to $0.88 per kilogram in the three months ended September 30, 2010. We expect our sales to continue to fluctuate with the market price of ducks, and we intend to continue to shift the uses of our ducklings between sales to market and internal use for food product to maximize our profits as the market conditions change.

In the last three fiscal quarters of 2010, we made significant sales of feed products to external customers through one distributor, while continuing to supply the Breed Unit. We did not make any sales to this distributor in the first fiscal quarter of 2011, then resumed sales in the second quarter of 2011. Sales to this distributor have been historically volatile, and sales in the quarter ended September 30, 2011 were substantially lower than the same quarter of 2010. We will continue to attempt to market our feed products to external customers, primarily through feed distributors, and expect that we will continue to realize sales revenue from such products. However, because distribution of these products is currently concentrated in one distributor, sales are volatile, and the permanent loss of that distributor would materially adversely affect such sales.

Food Unit sales were down in the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared with three months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of higher market prices for ducklings, which resulted in more ducklings sold to market rather than being used internally for Food Unit products. When market prices of ducks is unusually high, on a consolidated basis we can make higher profits by selling ducks into the market rather than processing them into food products, which have a more stable market price, and thus will yield lower margins when the input costs increase. Because the total number of ducks produced by our Breeding Unit is fairly constant, we can maximize our profits by selling more live ducks when their market price is high, and by selling more food products when the market price of ducks is low. Accordingly, sales of Food Unit products decreased from 2010 to 2011 as a larger portion of the ducks produced at our facility were sold directly by the Breeding Unit due to the higher market price in 2011 relative to 2010, rather than being processed and sold as food product.

Revenues shown above reflect only sales to external customers. We also made substantial internal sales during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, as follows:

	Buying Unit
	Three months ended September 30, 2011						Three months ended September 30, 2010
	Breeding		Feed		Food		Breeding		Feed		Food
Selling Unit	Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit

Breeding Unit	$	—	$	—	$	85	$	—	$	—	$	80,393
Feed Unit		3,188,662		—		—		3,424,370		—		—
Food unit		—		—		—		—		—		—

	$	3,188,662	$	—	$	85	$	3,424,370	$	—	$	80,393

During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, all of our sales were to customers located in the PRC. Our most significant intercompany sales are sales of feed product from the Feed Unit to the Breeding Unit.

Cost of goods sold and gross margin

Cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $5,267,525 and $8,384,715, respectively. Cost of goods sold consists principally of the cost of grains and fees paid to subcontracted farmers to raise commercial ducklings. The cost of grains fluctuates due to market, political, and economic factors that are beyond our control. A dramatic increase in the price of grain could reduce profit margins and adversely affect our results of operations if we are unable to pass such increased costs on to customers. Gross margins on revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were 26% and 25%, respectively. The increased gross margin was primarily the result of increased sales prices of duck in 2011 relative to 2010, disproportionate to the relatively smaller increase in cost of grains and other materials used to raise ducks. As a result, margins on duck sales increased from 28% in the three months ended September 30, 2010 to 39% in the three months ended September 30, 2011. Additionally, the amount of feed processed and sold to external customers decreased from 2010 to 2011, resulting in a gross decrease in cost of goods sold for the raw grains used to produce this externally sold feed product.

Sales and marketing expenses

Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $11,081 and $10,823, respectively.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $2,010,990 and $542,800, respectively, and are comprised of expenses related to corporate administration, accounting, and other shared corporate costs. General and administrative expenses were higher during the three months ended September 30, 2011 due to reserves for estimated uncollectible accounts recorded against accounts receivable, loans receivable, prepayments, and sale price receivable in the amount of $1,119,121 in 2011, and increased professional services, wage and overhead costs associated with being public in 2011 of $466,494, offset by lower business tax of $117,279 in 2011.

Gain on change in fair value of derivative financial instruments

The warrants issued in our financing transactions completed in November 2010 and March 2011 do not meet all of the established criteria for equity classification in FASB ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, and accordingly, are recorded as derivative liabilities at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the warrants are charged or credited to income each period. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized income resulting from a decrease in the fair value of derivative financial instruments in the amount of $37,372. The gain is primarily a result of minor changes to the contractual life of the instruments as a result of the passage of time and minor changes to the volatility input. Our stock price was $2.00 per share at each of June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2011.

Other income (expense)

Other income (expense) for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was ($29,990) and $5,409, respectively. Other income is comprised income and expenses that do not relate to our core operations.

Subsidy income

During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we recognized subsidy income of $8,257 and $292, respectively.

Interest expense

Interest expense (net) for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

	Three months ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Interest income	$	(69,965	)	$	(779	)
Interest expense		415,398			456,123
Bank fees		(6,578	)		(5,338	)
Amortization of debt discount		5,025			45,155
Imputed interest expense		—			64,546

	$	343,880		$	559,707

Interest income is derived from interest earned on bank deposits, loans receivable, and cash and cash equivalents, and was higher in the three months ended September 30, 2011 than the three months ended September 30, 2010 due to higher average interest-bearing cash deposits in 2011 than in 2010. Interest expense relates to interest accrued on bank loans and credit facilities, and bank fees relating to cash accounts, and was and was similar to prior year. We also recognized interest expense to amortize discounts on the face value of certain zero-interest loans with a stated maturity date. Imputed interest expense represents interest expense on zero interest debt with no maturity date.

Income tax expense

Net income (loss)

Net income (loss) for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was ($321,764) and $1,448,085, respectively. The increased loss in 2011 was the result of (i) reserves for estimated uncollectible accounts recorded against accounts receivable, loans receivable, prepayments, and sale price receivable in the amount of $1,119,121 in 2011, (ii) lower gross profit of $833,894 resulting from lower sales in 2011, and (iii) increased professional services, wage and overhead costs associated with being public in 2011 of $466,494. These amounts were offset by (i) lower interest expense of $215,827 in 2011, (ii) lower business tax of $117,279 in 2011, and (iii) a gain on the change in fair value of derivative financial instruments in the amount of $37,372 in 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2011 , December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009 , we had unrestricted cash balances of $2,437,658 , $1,930,319, and $605,392, respectively, and working capital deficiencies of $3,867,880 , $2,695,440, and $12,804,524, respectively. The substantial improvement in working capital deficiency from 2009 to 2010 was caused by (i) completion of the financing for gross cash proceeds of $5,107,472 during November 2010, (ii) a shift in bank loan balances from current to long term – while total bank loans payable increased from $13.7 million at December 31, 2009 to $18.9 million at December 31, 2010 as we used these proceeds to continue to grow our production capacity with investment in new duck breeding fields 6, 7 and 8, the current portion of bank loans payable decreased from $11.4 million to $7.9 million as we shifted a substantial portion of the loan due dates to 2013 and 2014, and (iii) continued profitable operations in 2010. The increase in working capital deficiency from December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011 was caused primarily by a shift from long term loans payable to current loans payable, offset by completion of the financing for net cash proceeds of $1,019,500 during March 2011, as well as continued profitable operations in 2010 and 2011.

In addition to funds raised in the November 2010 and March 2011 financing transactions, we have historically met our capital requirements through short-term and long-term borrowings from banks. During the reporting periods, we arranged a number of bank loans to satisfy our financing needs. As of September 30, 2011, we have not experienced any difficulty in raising funds through bank loans, and have not experienced any liquidity problems in settling our payables in the normal course of business and refinancing, extending, or repaying bank loans when they come due.

Significant Liquidity Events

In March 2011, we consummated the sale of an aggregate 575,000 shares of common stock at a price of $2.00 per share for gross cash proceeds of $1,150,000, and net proceeds of $1,019,500. In connection therewith, we also issued to the investors warrants to purchase 143,750 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share and a contractual term of three years, as well as placement agent warrants to purchase 46,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 and a contractual term of five years.

In November 10, 2010, we consummated the sale of an aggregate 2,920,392 shares of common stock to eight investors at a price of $2.00 per share for gross cash proceeds of $5,107,472, and the exchange of $549,984 in previously issued debentures that were converted into common stock. Net cash proceeds were $5,180,358 after the debt conversion, commissions, and offering costs. In connection therewith, we also issued to the investors warrants to purchase 730,098 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share and a contractual term of three years, as well as placement agent warrants to purchase 226,298 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 and a contractual term of five years.

The proceeds from these financing transactions are being used principally to construct a new cooked food processing line at our facilities in Ningguo City, PRC. Upon completion of the cooked food processing line, which is expected to be completed in 2012, we intend to manufacture, market, and sell ready-to-eat cooked food products through new and existing distribution channels. We believe that the demand for these types of finished food products is very strong in China, and we expect demand to remain strong for the foreseeable future as the urban Chinese “middle class” continues to expand. The expected cost of the new production line is approximately $4.5 million.

In addition to these financings, we have historically funded our operations through bank debt. During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 we were able to restructure a substantial portion of our bank debt from current to long term. Bank loans outstanding as of September 30, 2011 , and December 31, 2010 and 2009, were as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(unaudited)		(audited)		(audited)
Loans payable, current portion	$	13,461,689	$	7,864,727	$	11,408,179
Loans payable, long term portion		8,284,931		11,016,050		2,249,997

	$	21,746,620	$	18,880,777	$	13,658,176

Our long term debt comes due as follows:

October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012	$	13,502,723
2013		5,514,295
2014		2,729,602

Cash Flow Statement

The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 , and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 :

	Nine months ended September 30,						Years ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2010			2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(audited)			(audited)
Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities	$	588,289		$	(2,108,484	)	$	2,196,995		$	(6,734,624	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,852,710	)		(4,547,570	)		(8,778,048	)		(2,705,553	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,850,900			6,744,348			7,951,559			9,350,833
Effect of exchange rate difference on cash and cash equivalents		(79,140	)		13,884			(45,579	)		1,673
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,930,319			605,392			605,392			693,063
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		2,437,658			707,570			1,930,319			605,392

Net cash generated from (used in) operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $588,289 and ($2,108,484), respectively. The increased cash generated is due to increased net income from improved gross profit in the Breeding Unit. Offsetting these increases to cash was an increase in inventory purchases and prepaid expenses, as well as a decrease in our accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Net cash used in investing activities decreased to $1,852,710 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $4,547,570 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. 2010 includes receipt of proceeds in the amount of $2,053,870 from the sale of our fertilizer plant, offset by cash outflow for a long term investment in the amount of $1,467,050. We also made deposits against equipment and land use rights purchases of $3,001,705 and purchases of property and equipment of $1,962,784 in 2010.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1,850,900 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared with $6,744,348 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Repayments received (net of advances made) pursuant to loans receivable were $647,587 in 2011, compared with ($1,581,559) in 2010, as we called outstanding loans receivable in 2011. Advances received (net of repayments made) pursuant to loans payable were ($1,973,884) in 2011, as compared with $3,265,293 in 2010. Bank borrowings, net of repayments, were $2,157,697 in 2011 as compared with $4,505,614 in 2010. During 2010, we borrowed $555,000 in the form of a convertible note payable to fund costs associated with the Reverse Merger Transaction. During 2011, we received $1,019,500 from the March 2011 financing.

Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities was $2,196,995 in the year ended December 31, 2010 and ($6,734,624) in the year ended December 31, 2009. The increased cash generation is due principally to increased net income from improved sales and profit margins. Additionally, our accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased as we paid down our trade payables from available cash. Offsetting these increases to cash was an increase to accounts receivable in 2010 from 2009 resulting from increased sales combined with additional credit extended to our customers.

Net cash used in investing activities increased to $8,778,048 in the year ended December 31, 2010 from $2,705,553 in the year ended December 31, 2009. We increased investment in our breeding infrastructure during 2010 in order to position our company to support rapid growth, and to internally supply ducks for both the existing raw food processing business and the cooked food business that is under construction. We invested heavily into duck farms 5, 6, 7 and 8 in order to support the capacity expansion.

N et cash provided by financing activities was $7,951,559 in the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared with $9,350,833 in the year ended December 31, 2009. Bank borrowings, net of repayments, were $4,668,138 in 2010 as compared with $4,260,550 in 2009. During 2010, we borrowed $555,000 in the form of a convertible note payable to fund costs associated with the Reverse Merger Transaction, of which $100,016 was repaid in cash and the balance was converted into shares of our common stock. During 2010, we received net proceeds of $4,610,374 from the sale of common stock, as compared with a capital investment of $4,385,388 into Taiyang 2009.

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth our long term debt and other long term commitments as of September 30, 2011 , and December 31, 2010 and 2009 :

	Total		< 1 year		1-3 years		3-4 Years		> 5 years
September 30, 2011:
Debt	$	21,746,620	$	13,461,689	$	8,284,931	$	—	$	—
Operating Leases (1)		—		—		—		—		—
	$	21,746,620	$	13,461,689	$	8,284,931	$	—	$	—

December 31, 2010:
Debt	$	18,880,777	$	7,864,727	$	11,016,050	$	—	$	—
Operating Leases (1)		—		—		—		—		—
	$	18,880,777	$	7,864,727	$	11,016,050	$	—	$	—

December 31, 2009:
Debt	$	13,658,176	$	11,408,179	$	2,223,874	$	26,123	$	—
Operating Leases (1)		—		—		—		—		—
	$	13,658,176	$	11,408,179	$	2,223,874	$	—	$	—

(1)

Taiyang leases certain of its facilities pursuant to non-cancellable lease agreements expiring at various times through 2037. The amount of rent on these facilities is not fixed, but is based on the government stipulated market price of grains multiplied by the grain yield per area. Because future rents on these facilities depend upon unknown future market and production factors, the amount of future commitment cannot be quantified.

Despite the fact that we have a working capital deficiency at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and 2009 , we believe that we can sustain operations for at least the next 12 months without additional outside financing. Our working capital deficiency has decreased substantially since 2009 . As a privately held Chinese company prior to the Reverse Merger Transaction we had limited access to equity capital, and we funded our expansion through bank loans, a substantial portion of which were less than one year in term, but were renewed, repaid, or replaced with new loans on an annual basis. This approach resulted in a working capital deficiency on our balance sheet in past years, as well as in the current period. While we did not have any contracts or firm commitments to renew, extend or replace such debt, we have historically not experienced difficulty in doing so.

Exchange Rate Information

We conduct our business in China and substantially all of our revenues are denominated in Renminbi. This prospectus contains translations of Renminbi amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. No representation is made that the Renminbi amounts referred to in this prospectus could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at any particular rate or at all. On December 31, 2011 , the noon buying rate in The City of New York for cable transfers in Renminbi per U.S. dollar as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was RMB6. 2939 to US$1.00. On January 6, 2012 , the noon buying rate was RMB6. 3088 to US$1.00.

The following table sets forth information concerning exchange rates between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar for the periods indicated.

	Renminbi per U.S. Dollar Noon Buying Rate
	Average(1)		High		Low		Period-End

Year ended December 31, 2009		6.8295		6.8470		6.8244		6.8259
Year ended December 31, 2010		6.7696		6.8330		6.6000		6.6000
Year ended December 31, 2011		6. 4725		6.6364		6. 2939		6. 2939

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(1)	Annual averages are calculated from month-end rates. Monthly and interim period averages are calculated using the average of the daily rates during the relevant period.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

Financial Instruments and Other Instruments

Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, loans receivable, other receivables, prepaid and other current assets, amounts due from/to related parties, trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities, other accounts payable, and current loans payable. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values due to the relatively short-term maturity of these instruments. Cash has been valued using the market value technique.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of the financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, property and asset valuations, and inventory. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements include estimates of the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources. The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying these most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our consolidated financial statements.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management at the date of the financial statements to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates include estimating allowance for doubtful accounts, estimating the net realizable value of inventory, the future cash flows for assessing the net recoverable amount of long-lived assets, and accrued liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Inventory

Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost, determined using the weighted average costing method, and net realizable value. Cost includes purchased raw materials (primarily corn and other grains), breeding and incubation costs (primarily feed and contract grower pay), labor, and manufacturing and production overhead which are related to the purchase and production of inventories. The weighted-average method includes invoice cost, duties and freight where applicable, plus direct labor applied to the product and an applicable share of manufacturing overhead. A provision for obsolescence for slow moving inventory items is estimated by management based on historical and expected future sales and is included in cost of goods sold.

Biological assets

Biological assets are comprised of master breeding ducks that are treated as capitalized assets due to their ability to produce offspring that are also capable of breeding. These biological assets generally have a productive breeding period of approximately one year. We capitalize these assets and amortize their cost, which includes any cost to acquire the duck plus costs incurred for hatching and incubation, over a period of one year.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less allowance for accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The depreciable basis for property, plant and equipment is original cost less estimated residual value, which does not exceed 5% of the cost. Upon retirement or sale, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred. Material expenditures, which increase the life of an asset, are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated remaining life of the asset. Costs incurred prior to a capital project’s completion are reflected as construction in progress and are not depreciated until the asset is placed into service. The estimated service lives of property and equipment are as follows:

Production equipment	3-10 years
Transportation equipment	5-10 years
Office furniture and equipment	5 years
Building and building improvements	10-20 years

Costs incurred prior to a capital project’s completion are reflected as construction in progress and are not depreciated until the asset is placed into service.

Construction in progress

Construction in progress is stated at cost, which comprises direct costs of design, acquisition, and construction of buildings, building improvements and land improvements. We also capitalize interest on loans related to construction projects. Upon completion, construction in progress is transferred to its respective asset classification and is amortized upon being put into use.

Land use rights

We account for land use rights as an asset in our financial statements. However, all lands in the PRC are owned by the PRC government. The PRC government, according the relevant PRC law, may sell the right to use the land for a specific period of time. Land use rights are recorded at cost less accumulated amortization. Land use rights are amortized over 50 years, which are the terms established by the PRC government. The purpose of the land use is restricted by the PRC government. In the event that the land is used for purposes outside the scope of the purpose for which they were granted, the government could revoke such rights.

Revenue recognition

We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, goods are shipped and title passes, collection is probable, and the fee is fixed or determinable. We record deferred revenue when cash is received in advance of the revenue recognition criteria being met.

Foreign currency translation and comprehensive income

Our functional or primary operating currency is the Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”). Our financial statements are prepared in RMB before translating to the United States dollar (“USD”) for reporting purposes. We translate transactions in currencies other than the RMB at the exchange rate in effect on the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the RMB are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting exchange gains and losses are recognized in earnings.

Amounts transacted in RMB have been translated into USD as follows: assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date, equity items are translated at historical rates, and revenue and expense items are translated at the average rates for each period reported. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from the translation into the reporting currency are accumulated in accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of equity.

We apply SFAS 130 “Reporting Comprehensive Income” (codified in FASB ASC Topic 220). Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and all changes to the statements of stockholders’ equity, except those due to investments by stockholders, changes in paid-in capital and distributions to stockholders.

Statutory reserves

Statutory reserve refers to the amount appropriated from the net income in accordance with laws or regulations, which can be used to recover losses and increase capital, as approved, and, are to be used to expand production or operations. The articles of association of Taiyang and Ningguo, which are based on PRC corporate laws, prescribe that these entities must appropriate, on an annual basis, 10% of their after tax income as reported in their financial statements, prepared in accordance with PRC GAAP, to the statutory common reserve fund until the fund reaches 50% of their respective Registered Capital.

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to our common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is determined by adjusting the net income attributable to the common shareholder and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential common shares. Basic and diluted earnings per share are the same because we do not have any equity instruments that would impact the calculation of diluted earnings per share.

Employee welfare benefits

Pursuant to PRC law, full-time employees of Taiyang are entitled to staff welfare benefits including medical care, welfare subsidies, unemployment insurance, and pension benefits through a PRC government-mandated multiemployer pension plan. Taiyang is required to contribute a portion of the employees’ salaries to the retirement benefit scheme to fund the benefits, which are charged to operations as incurred. The government reserves right to change rates retroactively, which may result in a contingent liability being recorded for previous years.

Segment reporting

SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (codified in FASB ASC Topic 280) requires use of the “management approach” model for segment reporting. The management approach model is based on the method a company’s management uses to organize segments within the company for making operating decisions and assessing performance. Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure, or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company. Management evaluates our operations based on three operating segments: Breeding Unit, Feed Unit, and Food Unit.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” This ASU amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments to the Codification in the ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” The new guidance limits the highest-and-best-use measure to nonfinancial assets, permits certain financial assets and liabilities with offsetting positions in market or counterparty credit risks to be measured at a net basis, and provides guidance on the applicability of premiums and discounts. Additionally, the new guidance expands the disclosures on Level 3 inputs by requiring quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions, as well as description of the valuation processes and the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Other than requiring additional disclosures, we do not anticipate material impacts on our financial statements upon adoption.

In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) — Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” ASU No. 2010-29 clarifies that, when presenting comparative financial statements, SEC registrants should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the current period business combinations had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 was adopted on January 1, 2011. This ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-28, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” ASU No. 2010-28 addresses questions about entities that have reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. The amendments modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples in paragraph 350-20-35-30, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. In addition, current GAAP will be improved by eliminating an entity’s ability to assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform Step 2 because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate the goodwill is more likely than not impaired. As a result, goodwill impairments may be reported sooner than under current practice. The provisions of ASC No. 2010-28 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after Dec. 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) — Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” ASU No. 2010-29 clarifies that, when presenting comparative financial statements, SEC registrants should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the current period business combinations had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for material (either on an individual or aggregate basis) business combinations entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010 with early adoption permitted.

In April 2010, the FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement regarding the milestone method of revenue recognition. The scope of this pronouncement is limited to arrangements that include milestones relating to research or development deliverables. The pronouncement specifies criteria that must be met for a vendor to recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. The criteria apply to milestones in arrangements within the scope of this pronouncement regardless of whether the arrangement is determined to have single or multiple deliverables or units of accounting. The pronouncement will be effective for fiscal years, an interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. Companies can apply this guidance prospectively to milestones achieved after adoption. However, retrospective application to all prior periods is also permitted. This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In March 2010, FASB issued an authoritative pronouncement regarding the effect of denominating the exercise price of a share-based payment award in the currency of the market in which the underlying equity securities trade and that currency is different from (1) the entity’s functional currency, (2) the functional currency of the foreign operation for which the employee provides services, and (3) the payroll currency of the employee. The guidance clarifies that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trade should be considered an equity award assuming all other criteria for equity classification are met. The pronouncement will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010, and will be applies prospectively. Affected entities will be required to record a cumulative catch-up adjustment for all awards outstanding as of the beginning of the annual period in which the guidance is adopted. This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

On March 5, 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to clarify the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Specifically, only one form of embedded credit derivative qualifies for the exemption – one that is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. This guidance also has transition provisions, which permit entities to make a special one-time election to apply the fair value option to any investment in a beneficial interest in securitized financial assets, regardless of whether such investments contain embedded derivative features. This guidance is effective on the first day of the first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of any fiscal quarter beginning after March 5, 2010. This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

BUSINESS

Company History

Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. was incorporated in the State of Delaware on April 7, 1999 as The Parkview Group, Inc. From inception through November 2010, we were in the business of providing management consulting services to corporate clients.

On November 10, 2010 (the “Closing Date” and the closing of the reverse merger transaction, the “Closing”), we executed and consummated a share exchange agreement by and among Dynamic Ally and the stockholders of 100% of Dynamic Ally’s common stock (the “Dynamic Ally Shareholders”), on the one hand, and certain holders of our issued and outstanding common stock (the “Representative Shareholders”) on the other hand (the “Share Exchange Agreement” and the transaction, the “Reverse Merger Transaction”).

In the Reverse Merger Transaction, Dynamic Ally’s shareholders exchanged their shares of Dynamic Ally for newly issued shares of our common stock. As a result, upon completion of the Reverse Merger Transaction, Dynamic Ally became our wholly-owned subsidiary.

Dynamic Ally owns 100% of Ningguo, which is a wholly foreign owned enterprise (“WFOE”) under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”). Ningguo has entered into a series of contractual arrangements (as further described below under the heading “Organizational Structure”) with Taiyang, a limited liability company headquartered in, and organized under the laws of, the PRC.

As a result of the Reverse Merger Transaction, we acquired 100% of the capital stock of Dynamic Ally and consequently, control of the business and operations of Dynamic Ally, Ningguo, and Taiyang.

Effective January 20, 2011, we changed our name from “The Parkview Group, Inc.” to “Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc.”

Organizational Structure

Dynamic Ally is a holding company incorporated in British Virgin Islands. Since incorporation, Dynamic Ally has not conducted any substantive operations of its own except for holding 100% equity interests of Ningguo.

Ningguo is a limited liability company organized in the PRC on May 25, 2010. Ningguo was formed by Dynamic Ally. Other than the activities relating to its contractual arrangements with Taiyang as described below, Ningguo has no other business operations.

Taiyang is a limited liability company organized in the PRC in June 1996. Taiyang holds the government licenses and approvals necessary to operate the duck farming business in China. We do not own any equity interests in Taiyang, but control and receive the economic benefits of its business operations through contractual arrangements. Through Ningguo, we have contractual arrangements with Taiyang and its owners pursuant to which we provide consulting and other general business operation services. We will receive distributions from our consolidated affiliates only to the extent service fees are paid to Ningguo under these series of agreements and further distributed as dividends or other shareholder distributions by Ningguo through Dynamic Ally. Through these contractual arrangements, we also have the ability to substantially influence their daily operations and financial affairs, since we are able to appoint their senior executives and approve all matters requiring approval of the equity owners. As a result of these contractual arrangements, which enable us to control Taiyang and to receive, through Ningguo, all of its profits, we are considered the primary beneficiary of Taiyang. Accordingly, we consolidate its results, assets and liabilities in our financial statements.

Contractual Arrangements with Taiyang and its Stockholders

Our relationships with Taiyang and its owners are governed by a series of contractual arrangements, as we (including our subsidiaries) do not own any equity interests in Taiyang. The contractual arrangements constitute valid and binding obligations of the parties of such agreements. Each of the contractual arrangements and the rights and obligations of the parties thereto are enforceable and valid in accordance with the laws of the PRC. Under Chinese laws, each of Ningguo and Taiyang is an independent legal entity and neither of them is exposed to liabilities incurred by the other party. Other than pursuant to the contractual arrangements between Ningguo and Taiyang, Taiyang does not transfer any other funds generated from its operations to Ningguo.

On May 26, 2010, Ningguo entered into the following contractual arrangements with Taiyang:

Consulting Services Agreement. Pursuant to the exclusive consulting services agreement between Ningguo and Taiyang, Ningguo has the exclusive right to provide to Taiyang general services related to the current and proposed operations of Taiyang’s business in the PRC (the “Services”). Ningguo also sends employees to Taiyang and Taiyang bears the costs and expenses for such employees. Under this agreement, Ningguo owns the intellectual property rights developed through the Services provided to Taiyang. Taiyang pays a quarterly consulting service fee in Renminbi (“RMB”) to Ningguo that is equal to all of Taiyang’s net income for such quarter. The consulting services agreement is in effect unless and until terminated by written notice of either party in the event that: (a) Taiyang causes a material breach of this agreement, provided that if the breach does not relate to a financial obligation of the breaching party, that party may attempt to remedy the breach following the receipt of the written notice; (b) the other party becomes bankrupt, insolvent, is the subject of proceedings or arrangements for liquidation or dissolution, ceases to carry on business, or becomes unable to pay its debts as they become due; (c) Ningguo terminates its operations; or (d) circumstances arise which would materially and adversely affect the performance or the objectives of the consulting services agreement. Additionally, Ningguo may terminate the consulting services agreement without cause.

Operating Agreement. Pursuant to the operating agreement among Ningguo, Taiyang and the owners of Taiyang who collectively hold 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Taiyang (collectively the “Taiyang Owners”), Ningguo provides guidance and instructions on Taiyang’s daily operations, financial management and employment issues. The Taiyang Owners must designate the candidates recommended by Ningguo as their representatives on Taiyang’s board of directors. Ningguo has the right to appoint senior executives of Taiyang. In addition, Ningguo agrees to guarantee the performance of Taiyang under any agreements or arrangements relating to Taiyang’s business arrangements with any third party. Taiyang, in return, agrees to pledge its accounts receivable and all of its assets to Ningguo. Moreover, Taiyang agrees that without the prior consent of Ningguo, Taiyang will not engage in any transactions that could materially affect the assets, liabilities, rights or operations of Taiyang, including, without limitation, incurrence or assumption of any indebtedness, sale or purchase of any assets or rights, incurrence of any encumbrance on any of its assets or intellectual property rights in favor of a third party or transfer of any agreements relating to its business operation to any third party. The term of this agreement shall last for the maximum period of time permitted by law from May 26, 2010, and may be terminated only upon Ningguo’s thirty (30) day prior written notice to Taiyang.

Equity Pledge Agreement Under the equity pledge agreement between the Taiyang Owners and Ningguo, the Taiyang Owners pledged all of their equity interests in Taiyang to Ningguo to guarantee Taiyang’s performance of its obligations under the consulting services agreement. If Taiyang or the Taiyang Owners breach their respective contractual obligations, Ningguo, as pledgee, will be entitled to certain rights, including, but not limited to, the right to sell the pledged equity interests, the right to vote and control the pledged assets. The Taiyang Owners also agreed, that upon occurrence of any event of default, Ningguo shall be granted an exclusive, irrevocable power of attorney to take actions in the place and instead of the Taiyang Owners to carry out the security provisions of the equity pledge agreement and take any action and execute any instrument that Ningguo may deem necessary or advisable to accomplish the purposes of the equity pledge agreement. The Taiyang Owners agreed not to dispose of the pledged equity interests or take any actions that would prejudice Ningguo’s interest. The equity pledge agreement will expire in two years after Taiyang’s obligations under the exclusive consulting services agreement have been fulfilled.

Option Agreement. Under the option agreement between the Taiyang Owners and Ningguo, the Taiyang Owners irrevocably granted Ningguo or its designated person an exclusive option to purchase, to the extent permitted under Chinese law, all or part of the equity interests in Taiyang for the cost of the initial contributions to the registered capital or the minimum amount of consideration permitted by applicable Chinese law. Ningguo or its designated person has sole discretion to decide when to exercise the option, whether in part or in full. The term of this agreement shall last for the maximum period of time permitted by law from May 26, 2010.

Voting Rights Proxy Agreement. Pursuant to the voting rights proxy agreement among Ningguo, the Taiyang Owners, and Taiyang, the Taiyang Owners agreed to entrust all the rights to exercise their voting power to designee(s) of Ningguo. Such designee(s) shall have the right to exercise the Taiyang Owners’ voting and other rights, including the attendance at and the voting of their shares at Taiyang’s shareholders meetings (or by written consent in lieu of meetings) in accordance with applicable laws and Taiyang’s Article of Association. This agreement may not be terminated without the unanimous consent of all parties, except that Ningguo may, by giving a thirty (30) day prior written notice to the Taiyang Owners, terminate the voting rights proxy agreement, with or without cause.

Contractual Ownership of Firm Success International, Ltd.

Our largest shareholder is Firm Success International, Ltd. (Firm Success). Phong Sae-Ia is currently the owner of 100% of the capital stock of Firm Success. Phong Sae-Ia’s ownership in Firm Success is subject to a Call Option Agreement between Phong Sae-Ia and Wu Qiyou, our Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which Wu Qiyou has been granted an option to acquire 100% of Phong Sae-Ia’s ownership in Firm Success. The option vests over a three year period, of which 34% is currently vested, 33% vests on April 2, 2012 and 33% vests on April 2, 2013. The option expires on May 24, 2015. As a result, at any time after April 2, 2012, Wu Qiyou may exercise options to control a majority of the capital stock of Firm Success, and thus, ownership of the common stock of our company owned by Firm Success.

Current Corporate Structure

We conduct substantially all of our business operations through Taiyang. Chinese law currently has limits on foreign ownership of certain businesses which prohibit non-Chinese persons from having direct ownership interests. To comply with these foreign ownership restrictions, neither we nor our subsidiaries own any equity interests in Taiyang, but control and receive the economic benefits of its business operations through contractual arrangements.

The following diagram illustrates our current corporate structure:

Operations

Our operations are carried out in the PRC by Taiyang. Founded in 1996, Taiyang raises, processes and markets ducks and ducks related food products.

	·	Breeding Unit – breeds, hatches, and cultivates ducklings for resale and processing by food processing unit;
	·	Feed Unit – produces duck feed for internal use and external sale; and
	·	Food Processing Unit – processes ducklings into frozen raw food product for commercial resale.

Our units are fully integrated to maximize production efficiency and profits. By manufacturing our own feed to nourish our livestock, and by using our internal production stock to supply our food unit, we reduce both our cost and our reliance on the quality of product provided by outside vendors. We save by leveraging shared overhead, reduced marketing and distribution costs, and reduced transportation costs, to name a few savings derived from our structure.

Breeding Unit

Duck breeding is generally comprised of a system of grandparent, parent and production stock. Grandparent ducks are master breeding stock that we import from Cherry Valley Farms in the United Kingdom. Cherry Valley SM3 grandparent ducks are well-known worldwide for their breeding abilities. These grandparent ducks produce offspring parent ducks, which in turn produce offspring that will either mature into additional parent ducks to breed, or will not be capable of reproduction and will be used for production stock. Once the breeding ducks have exceeded their breeding period, they are then used in production stock.

We currently have production capacity to support approximately 8,400 grandparent ducks, which are capable of producing approximately 150,000 parent ducks annually. These parent ducks in turn could produce an estimated 30,000,000 ducklings per year.

Our Cherry Valley Grandparent Duck Breeding Center is the only Cherry Valley grandparent breed duck cultivation and incubation center in Anhui Province. It was established in 1999, with an area of nearly 30,000 square meters and can produce 600,000 parent breed duck seedlings per year.

Our parent duck breeding center consists of six large-scale parent duck breeding plants.

The commercial duck incubation center is equipped with advanced intelligent temperature controlled incubation equipment. The central computer controlled equipment maintains sealed incubation and sterilization. We have has implemented epidemic prevention procedures according to international Duck Incubation Standards.

We contract with surrounding farmer households in the raising of ducks outside the province of Anhui to supplement our current capacity. Utilizing this method, we have instituted standardized housing, raising, feeding, disease control, immunization and waste removal for these outside locations. We plan to expand farmer households to eventually raise 50 million commercial ducks annually.

Feed Unit

The Feed Processing Plant is a highly advanced computerized facility that processes, packages and loads / unloads various types of feed. It has annual production capacity of 100,000 metric tons and has an attached production development and quality testing institution. It develops and manufactures and sells a variety of different feeds utilized at various times in the life cycle of an animal.

Food Processing Unit

The Duck Slaughter Processing Plant operates in accordance with European, Japanese and Korean standards. It has an annual slaughtering capacity of 15,000,000 ducks and distributes in excess of 100 different kinds of products.

Sales

Sales to external customers during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 by unit were as follows:

	2010		2009

Breeding Unit	$	12,592,738	$	7,704,942
Feed Unit		13,886,122		50,592
Food unit		15,206,128		21,104,165

	$	41,684,988	$	28,859,699

We also transact a substantial amount of intercompany feed product sales from the Feed Unit to the Breeding Unit, as well as sales of other products between units. Intercompany sales during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 by unit were as follows:

	Buying Unit
	Year Ended December 31, 2010						Year Ended December 31, 2009
	Breeding		Feed		Food		Breeding		Feed		Food
Selling Unit	Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit		Unit

Breeding Unit	$	—	$	—	$	218,016	$	—	$	—	$	—
Feed Unit		13,241,455		—		—		12,387,362		—		—
Food unit		—		8,681		—		51,137		—		—

	$	13,241,455	$	8,681	$	218,016	$	12,438,499	$	—	$	—

During 2009, the Feed Unit did not have any sales to external customers. During 2010, the Feed Unit made substantially all of its external sales to one customer.

Customers

Our major seedling clients include provincial level duck breeding farms which are located in Shandong province (Dezhou, Bingzhou, Hezhe), Jiangsu province (Nanjing, Xuzhou, Suzhou, Lianyungong), Henan (Zhengzhou, Zhumadian), Anhui (Hefei, Wuhu, Tonglin, Anqing, Huibei, Chuzhou, Pengbu), Zhejiang province (Huzhou, Jiaqing, Lishui, Baoshan), Shanghai, Guangdong (Guangzhou, Nanhai), Guangxi province, Liaoning province, Hebei province and Jiangxi province.

Our major commercial duck clients include two individual distributors, as well as fair trade markets in big or middle cities, such as Nanjing, Jiujiang, Wuhu, Hangzhou and Shanghai.

In 2010, one customer, Ji Chenghua, accounted for 36.7% and 11.1% of our Breeding Unit revenue and gross revenue, respectively. In 2010 we made significant sales of feed products to external customers through one distributor, Yu Qigui, who accounted for 99.5% and 33.1% of our Feed Unit revenue and gross revenue, respectively. In 2009 and 2010, one customer, Yao Ji, accounted for 39.3% and 57.1% of our Food Unit revenue, respectively and 14.3% and 41.8% of our gross revenue, respectively.

Major processed duck meat clients include meat food wholesale markets in big or middle cities, such as Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Nanchang, Kunming, Guangzhou, Bengbu and Huainan.

Competition

Major competitors include Henan Huaying Company and Shangdong Weifang Legong Company, both of which are privately held enterprises.

Government Regulations

Compliance with Circular 106 and the 2006 M&A Regulations

On May 29, 2007, SAFE issued an official notice known as “Circular 106”, which requires the owners of any Chinese companies to obtain SAFE’s approval before establishing any offshore holding company structure in so-called “round-trip” investment transactions for foreign financing as well as subsequent acquisition matters in China. Likewise, the “Provisions on Acquisition of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors”, issued jointly by Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”), State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, State Taxation Bureau, State Administration for Industry and Commerce (“SAIC”), China Securities Regulatory Commission and SAFE in August 2006, impose approval requirements from MOFCOM for “round-trip” investment transactions, including acquisitions in which equity was used as consideration. As of the date of this prospectus, we believe we are in compliance with Circular 106.

Dividend Distribution

The principal laws, rules and regulations governing dividends paid by our PRC operating subsidiary include the Company Law of the PRC (1993), as amended in 1999, 2004 and 2005 respectively, Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law (1986), as amended in 2000, and Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law Implementation Rules (1990), as amended in 2001. Under these laws and regulations, our operating subsidiary Ningguo may pay dividends only out of its accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, Ningguo is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profit based on PRC accounting standards each year to its statutory surplus reserve fund until the accumulative amount of such reserve reaches 50% of its respective registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. The board of directors of a WFOE has the discretion to allocate a portion of its after-tax profits to its staff welfare and bonus funds. After the allocation of relevant welfare and funds, the equity owners can distribute the rest of the after-tax profits provided that all the losses of the previous fiscal year have been made up.

Taxation

The applicable income tax laws, regulations, notices and decisions (collectively referred to as “Applicable PRC Enterprises Tax Law”) related to foreign investment enterprises and their investors mainly include the following:

	·	Notice Relating to Taxes Applicable to Foreign Investment Enterprises / Foreign Enterprises and Foreign Nationals in Relation to Dividends and Gains obtained from Holding and Transferring of Shares promulgated by State Tax Bureau on July 21, 1993;
	·	Amendments to the Income Tax Law Applicable to Individuals of the PRC promulgated by Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (“NPC”) on October 31, 1993;
	·	Notice on Relevant Policies Concerning Individual Income Tax issued by Ministry of Finance and the State Tax Bureau on May 13, 1994;
	·	Notice on Reduction of Income Tax in Relation to Interests and Gains Derived by Foreign Enterprises from the PRC, promulgated by the State Council on November 18, 2000; and
	·	Enterprise Income Tax Law of the PRC (“New EIT Law”) issued by NPC on March 16, 2007, which came into effect on January 1, 2008.

Enterprise Income Tax

We are subject to income, withholding, business and other taxes on income generated in the jurisdictions in which we do business.

Taiyang is exempt from corporate income tax due to the nature of its business. Beginning 2006, the PRC government instituted a tax exemption policy for certain aspects of the agricultural industry. Taiyang’s business qualifies as tax exempt. The exemption relates to unprocessed agricultural products and is granted by the relevant taxing authority on a year-by-year basis. There is no stated expiration to the exemption, and while Taiyang expects to continue to receive favorable tax treatment, changes in government policy or the nature of Taiyang’s operations could result in Taiyang being required to pay income taxes.

Ningguo is subject to corporate income tax in the PRC at a rate of 25% as a non-resident enterprise, as well as business tax at a rate of 5% on service income.

Under the laws of the BVI, Dynamic Ally is not subject to tax on its income or capital gains.

Taiyang is subject to United States income tax at a rate of 35%. Since completion of the Reverse Merger Transaction, all income has been generated in the PRC and no United States income tax obligation has been incurred. Business activity in the United States consists primarily of professional service expenses related to the Company’s public listing and compliance.

Value Added Tax

The Provisional Regulations of the PRC Concerning Value Added Tax promulgated by the State Council came into effect on January 1, 1994 and were amended in 2008. Under these regulations and the Implementing Rules of the Provisional Regulations of the PRC Concerning Value Added Tax, value added tax is imposed on goods sold in or imported into the PRC and on processing, repair and replacement services provided within the PRC.

Value added tax payable in the PRC is charged on an aggregated basis at a rate of 13% or 17% (depending on the type of goods involved) on the full price collected for the goods sold or, in the case of taxable services provided, at a rate of 17% on the charges for the taxable services provided but excluding, in respect of both goods and services, any amount paid in respect of value added tax included in the price or charges, and less any deductible value added tax already paid by the taxpayer on purchases of goods and service in the same financial year.

Taiyang has been recognized as an ordinary value added tax payer by the Development Zone Branch of State Taxation Bureau in Ningguo City since May 1, 2006, with the following exceptions:

	·	According to the written certificate issued by the Development Zone Branch of State Taxation Bureau in Ningguo City on April 29, 2010, the feed products of Taiyang are exempted from value added tax; and

	·	In accordance with the Provisional Regulations on value added tax, duck seedlings and duck eggs produced by Taiyang are classified as farm produce which are exempted from value added tax.

Business Tax

According to the Provisional Regulations of the PRC Concerning Business Tax promulgated by the State Council on December 13, 1993 and came into effect on January 1, 1994, which was revised by the State Council on November 10, 2008 and enforced from January 1, 2009, business that provides services, assigns intangible assets or sells immovable property became liable to business tax at a rate ranging from 3 to 5% of the charges of the services provided, intangible assets assigned or immovable property sold, as the case may be. Consulting services of Ningguo are subject to business tax at a rate of 5%.

WFOE

WFOEs are governed by the Law of the PRC Concerning Enterprises with Sole Foreign Investments, which was promulgated on April 12, 1986 and amended on October 31, 2000, and its Implementation Regulations promulgated on December 12, 1990 and amended on April 12,2001 (together the “Foreign Enterprises Law”).

	(a)	Procedures for establishment of a WFOE

		The establishment of a WFOE will have to be approved by the MOFCOM (or its delegated authorities). If two or more foreign investors jointly apply for the establishment of a WFOE, a copy of the contract between the parties must also be submitted to the MOFCOM (or its delegated authorities) for its record. A WFOE must also obtain a business license from the SAIC before it can commence business.

	(b)	Nature

		A WFOE is a limited liability company under the Foreign Enterprises Law. It is a legal person which may independently assume civil obligations, enjoy civil rights and has the right to own, use and dispose of property. It is required to have a registered capital contributed by the foreign investor(s). The liability of the foreign investor(s) is limited to the amount of registered capital contributed. A foreign investor may make its contributions by installments and the registered capital must be contributed within the period as approved by the MOFCOM (or its delegated authorities) in accordance with relevant regulations.

	(c)	Profit distribution

		The Foreign Enterprise Law provides that after payment of taxes, a WFOE must make contributions to a reserve fund, an enterprise development fund and an employee bonus and welfare fund. The allocation ratio for the employee bonus and welfare fund may be determined by the enterprise. However, at least 10% of the after tax profits must be allocated to the reserve fund. If the cumulative total of allocated reserve funds reaches 50% of an enterprise’s registered capital, the enterprise will not be required to make any additional contribution. The reserve fund may be used by a WFOE to make up its losses and with the consent of the examination and approval authority, can also be used to expand its production operations and to increase its capital. The enterprise is prohibited from distributing dividends unless the losses (if any) of previous years have been made up. The development fund is used for expanding the capital base of the company by way of capitalization issues. The employee bonus and welfare fund can only be used for the collective benefit and facilities of the employees of the WFOE.

Catalogue for the Guidance of Foreign Investment Industries

China issued the Catalogue for the Guidance of Foreign Investment Industries (“Guidance Catalogue”) in 1995, which was amended in 2002, 2004 and 2007 respectively. The current version of the Guidance Catalogue was promulgated by the MOFCOM and the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) on October 31, 2007 and became effective as of December 1, 2007, which retains the classification methodology and organizational structure used in the previous versions without significant changes. The Guidance Catalogue divides foreign investments into four categories:

	(i)	Encouraged Category. There are various incentives and preferential treatments for “encouraged” projects, mainly tax exemptions and rebates. Most foreign investment projects in the “encouraged” sector are allowed to take the form of WFOE;

	(ii)	Permitted Category. Sectors not listed therein belong to the “permitted” category and they are determined by the rule of exception. Therefore, unless the items are transferred among the “encouraged”, “restricted” and “prohibited” categories, any addition to or deletion from the “encourage”, “restricted” and “prohibited” categories would consequently affect the scope of the “permitted” category. Like those in the “encouraged” sector, foreign investment projects in the “permitted” sector are allowed to take the form of WFOE. However, they are generally not eligible for extra incentives and preferential treatments;

	(iii)	Restricted Category. There are stricter approvals or filing requirements for “restricted” projects. Furthermore, foreign investment projects in the “restricted” sectors may be required to take the form of Joint Venture. The foreign investors may only hold a minority interest in the investment projects; and

	(iv)	Prohibited Category. Foreign investments are not allowed in these sectors.

Foreign Exchange Controls

Major reforms have been introduced to the foreign exchange control system of the PRC since 1993.

On December 28, 1993, the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”), with the authorization of the State Council issued the Notice on Further Reform of the Foreign Exchange Control System which came into effect on January 1, 1994. Other new regulations and implementation measures include the Regulations on the Foreign Exchange Settlement, Sale and Payments which were promulgated on June 20, 1996 and took effect on July 1, 1996 and which contain detailed provisions regulating the settlement, sale and payment of foreign exchange by enterprises, individuals, foreign organizations and visitors in the PRC and the regulations of the PRC on Foreign Exchange Control which were promulgated on January 1, 1996 and took effect on April 1, 1996 and which contain detailed provisions in relation to foreign exchange control.

The foreign exchange earnings of all PRC enterprises, other than those foreign investment enterprises (“FIE”), who are allowed to retain a part of their regular foreign exchange earnings or specifically exempted under the relevant regulations, are to be sold to designated banks. Foreign exchange earnings obtained from borrowings from foreign institutions or issues of shares or bonds denominated in foreign currency need not be sold to designated banks, but must be kept in foreign exchange bank accounts of designated banks unless specifically approved otherwise.

At present, control of the purchase of foreign exchange is relaxed. Enterprises within the PRC which require foreign exchange for their ordinary trading and non-trading activities, import activities and repayment of foreign debts may purchase foreign exchange from designated banks if the application is supported by the relevant documents. Furthermore, FIEs may distribute profit to their foreign investors with funds in their foreign exchange bank accounts kept with designated banks. Should such foreign exchange be insufficient, enterprises may purchase foreign exchange from designated banks upon the presentation of the resolutions of the directors on the profit distribution plan of the particular enterprise.

Although the foreign exchange control over transactions under current accounts has decreased, enterprises shall obtain approval from SAFE before they accept foreign-currency loans, provide foreign currency guarantees, make investments in foreign countries or carry out any other capital account transactions involving the purchase of foreign currencies.

In foreign exchange transactions, designated banks may freely determine applicable exchange rates based on the rates publicized by PBOC and subject to certain governmental restrictions.

On October 21, 2005, SAFE issued the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Exchange Control Issues Relating to Financing and Reverse Investment by Persons Resident in the People’s Republic of China Through Offshore Special Purpose Vehicles (“SAFE Notice No. 75”), which became effective as of November 1, 2005. According to the SAFE Notice No. 75, prior registration with the local SAFE branch is required for PRC residents to establish or to control an offshore company for the purposes of financing that offshore company with assets or equity interests in an onshore enterprise located in the PRC. An amendment to registration or filing with the local SAFE branch by such PRC resident is also required for the injection of equity interests or assets of an onshore enterprise in the offshore company or overseas funds raised by such offshore company, or any other material change involving a change in the capital of the offshore company.

Moreover, the SAFE Notice No. 75 applies retroactively. As a result, PRC residents who have established or acquired control of offshore companies that have made onshore investments in the PRC in the past are required to complete the relevant registration procedures with the local SAFE branch by March 31, 2006. Under the relevant rules, failure to comply with the registration procedures set forth in the SAFE Notice No. 75 may result in restrictions being imposed on the foreign exchange activities of the relevant onshore company, including the increase of its registered capital, the payment of dividends and other distributions to its offshore parent or affiliate and the capital inflow from the offshore entity, and may also subject relevant PRC residents to penalties under PRC foreign exchange administration regulations. PRC residents who control our Company from time to time are required to register with the SAFE in connection with their investments in us.

Compliance with Environmental Laws

We are required to comply with several domestic environmental protection laws and regulations, including Environmental Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China, Law of the People’s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Atmospheric Pollution, Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Solid Waste, Law of the People’s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Pollution From Environmental Noise, Law of the People’s Republic of China on Appraising of Environment Impact and Regulations on the Administration of Construction Project Environmental Protection.

In accordance with the Environmental Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China adopted by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on December 26, 1989, the bureau of environmental protection of the State Council sets the national guidelines for the discharge of pollutants. The provincial and municipal governments of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities may also set their own guidelines for the discharge of pollutants within their own provinces or districts in the event that the national guidelines are inadequate. The subdivision environmental protection laws on control of pollution of water, air, solid waste and noise set more detailed rules, standards and specifications with respect to their areas of regulation.

Pursuant to the Environmental Protection Law and its subdivision laws, a company or enterprise which causes environmental pollution and discharges other polluting materials which endanger the public should implement environmental protection methods and procedures into their business operations. This may be achieved by setting up a system of accountability within the company’s business structure for environmental protection; adopting effective procedures to prevent environmental hazards such as waste gases, water and residues, dust powder, radioactive materials and noise arising from production, construction and other activities from polluting and endangering the environment. The environmental protection system and procedures should be implemented simultaneously with the commencement of and during the operation of construction, production and other activities undertaken by the company. Any company or enterprise which discharges environmental pollutants should report and register such discharge with relevant bureaus of environmental protection and pay any fines imposed for the discharge. A fee may also be imposed on the company for the cost of any work required to restore the environment to its original state. Companies which have caused severe pollution to the environment are required to restore the environment or remedy the effects of the pollution within a prescribed time limit.

In addition, the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Appraising of Environment Impact Issued by the National People’s Congress of China which came into effect on September 1, 2003 provides the methods and institutions for analyzing, predicting and appraising the impact of operation and construction projects that might incur after they are carried out. In case a construction project of any company or enterprise fails to pass the examination, the construction may not be started. Regulations on the Administration of Construction Project Environmental Protection Issued by the State Council of China which came into effect on November 29, 1998 provide that the building of construction projects having impacts on the environment within the territory of the People’s Republic of China shall compile or submit a report on environmental impact, a statement on environmental impact or a registration form on environmental impact in accordance with the extent of environmental impact of construction projects.

Employees

As of January 9, 2012 , we had four full-time employees, which are all officers. As of January 9, 2012 , Taiyang had 529 full-time employees, including 213 in the Breeding Unit, 43 in the Feed Unit, and 273 in the Food Unit. We and Taiyang consider relations with our employees to be good.

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES

Our principal executive offices and our facilities are located in Ningguo City, Anhui Province, China. The table below provides a general description of our facilities, all of which are located in or around Ningguo City:

Location	Principal Activities	Land Area (m2)	Land Use Rights	Lease Expiration Date
No. 88 Eastern Outer Ring Road, Ningguo City	Principal executive office and food processing plant	113,112	Direct	n/a
Bali Village	Feed plant	28,800	Direct	n/a
Bali Village	Incubation center	77,013	Direct	n/a
Nanshan Village	Breeding center #1	1,467	Leased	April 2017
No. 72 Industrial Road, Ningguo City	Original Breeding Center	24,437	Direct	n/a
Bali Village	Breeding center #1	18,251	Direct	n/a
Xia Village	Breeding center #3	18,386	Leased	May 2024
Jilin Village	Breeding center #4	35,153	Leased	June 2025
Xia Village	Breeding center #5	26,666	Leased	June 2037
Meilin Town Bridge Village	Breeding center #6	171,752	Leased	December 2028
Meilin Town Bridge Village	Breeding center #7	79,793	Leased	June 2029
Farm Village	Breeding center #8	166,665	Leased	September 2060
Bali Village	Grandparent Farm	10,384	Direct	n/a

We are not involved in investments in (i) real estate or interests in real estate, (ii) real estate mortgages, or (iii) securities of, or interests in, persons primarily engaged in real estate activities. All of our facilities and land rights are used for production purposes. We believe that all our properties and equipment have been adequately maintained, are generally in good condition, and are suitable and adequate for our business.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

MANAGEMENT

The names of our directors and executive officers and their ages, titles, and biographies as of January 9, 2012 are set forth below:

Name	Age	Position
Wu Qiyou	43	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
David Dodge	36	Chief Financial Officer
Chen Beihuang	42	Vice General Manager and Director
Han Jialiang	46	Financial Controller and Director
He Zhiwei	45	Director
James J. Keil	84	Director

Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified. Currently, there are five seats on our board of directors.

Officers are elected by the board of directors and serve until their successors are appointed by the board of directors. Biographical resumes of each officer and director are set forth below.

Wu Qiyou has been our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board since November 2010. Mr. Wu is the founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Taiyang. Mr. Wu founded Taiyang in 1996 and has acted as the principal executive officer since that date. Prior to founding Taiyang, Mr. Wu was the production manager of Xin Ling Electrical Machinery Factory of Ningguo County. Mr. Wu received a degree in enterprise management from Beijing Society Correspondence University in 1992. Mr. Wu was originally selected to serve as a director due to his deep familiarity with our business and his extensive entrepreneurial background.

David A. Dodge has been our Chief Financial Officer since November 2010. Mr. Dodge has been an independent financial consultant since 2007, acting as interim CFO and/or providing accounting, management, and financial reporting services for TTC Technology Corp (formerly SmarTire Systems, Inc.)(TCLIF.PK), Futuremedia PLC (FMDAY.OB), and multiple privately held Chinese companies in the process of going public and raising capital in North America. Previously, Mr. Dodge served as CFO of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB: NEOM), a U.S. public company, from 2002 through 2007. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Dodge held various finance-related positions with NeoMedia, including Director of Financial Reporting, Director of Financial Planning, and Controller. Prior to his public company experience, Mr. Dodge was an auditor with Ernst & Young LLP from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Dodge holds a B.A. in economics from Yale University and an M.S. in accounting from the University of Hartford, and is also a Certified Public Accountant (inactive).

Chen Beihuang has been our Vice General Manager and a Director since November 2010. Ms. Chen has served as Taiyang’s Vice General Manager since May 1999. Ms. Chen earned a junior college degree from Hefei Industrial College in 1998. Prior to joining Taiyang in 1999, Ms. Chen held various financial management and accounting positions at manufacturing companies in the PRC, including Ri Quan Photoelectric Company, Hong Xing Machinery Plant, Shan MenVehicle Transport Company, and Jiangnan Chemical Factory. Ms. Chen was selected to serve as a director due to her deep familiarity with our business and her substantial financial and accounting experience.

Han Jialiang has been our Financial Controller and a Director since November 2010. Mr. Han has served as Taiyang’s Finance Controller since January 2000. Mr. Han has served as Taiyang’s Finance Controller since January 2000. Mr. Han received a junior college degree from Anhui Finance and Trade College in July 2006. Prior to joining Taiyang in 2000, Mr. Han was Controller at Ningguo Industrial Group Company from August 1988 to May 1998, and was an auditor with Ningguo Audit Firm from May 1998 to December 1999. Mr. Han was selected to serve as a director due to his deep familiarity with our business and his substantial financial and accounting experience.

He Zhiwei has been a Director since November 2010. Mr. He has served as the Director and Chief Financial Officer of Chisen Technologies, Inc. since November 2008. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. He served as Strategic Commodity Manager of Worldwide Operations at Dell, Inc. From February 2001 to November 2006, Mr. He was responsible for capacity and service management of Capital One’s Technology Operations and Data Center Operations. In 2005, Mr. He became the Finance Manager at Capital One Global Financial Services, where he analyzed, reported and managed the financials and the annual operating budget of $130 million. In his tenure at Capital One Financial Corporation, Mr. He maintained a rigorous cost management discipline. From November 2006 to December 2007, Mr. He led the efforts at Circuit City Stores Inc. and BDA Inc. to develop private label branding strategies, consumer electronics products and video gaming accessories, where he minimized the dependency on non value-added brands. From December 2007 to November 2008, Mr. He played a leadership role at Amazon.com Inc. in maximizing Amazon’s segment share and profitability by developing and implementing the Private Label and Direct Import infrastructure and programs that had reinforced Amazon’s position as the global leader in online shopping for all products. Mr. He also helped rapidly expand and grow Amazon’s international retail business in Europe, Japan and China. Mr. He’s experience in finance and many years of senior management experience in a variety of sectors allows him to contribute broad financial and strategic planning expertise and led to the Board’s conclusion that he should serve as a director of the Company.

James J. Keil. Mr. Keil has been a Director since November 2010. Mr. Keil is founder and President of Keil Partners, LLC, a marketing, consulting and government reseller firm started in November 2009 now located in Chicago, Illinois specializing in reselling hardware and software products and solutions to the various agencies of the U.S. federal government. Mr. Keil also been a Director of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (OTCBB:NEOM) since August 1996. Prior to having his own businesses, Mr. Keil worked for 38 years at IBM and Xerox Corporation in various marketing, sales and senior executive positions. From 1989 to 1995, Mr. Keil was on the board of directors of Elixir Technologies Corporation (a non-public corporation) and from 1990 to 1992 was the Chairman of its Board of Directors. From 1992 to 1996, Mr. Keil served on the board of directors of Document Sciences Corporation. Mr. Keil holds a B.S. degree from the University of Dayton and did Masters level studies at the Harvard Business School and the University of Chicago in 1961-1962. Mr. Keil was selected to serve as a director due to his extensive entrepreneurial background and his experience as a public corporation director.

Family Relationships

None.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our Directors and Executive Officers have not been involved in any of the following events during the past ten years:

	1.	any bankruptcy petition filed by or against such person or any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

	2.	any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

	3.	being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities or to be associated with any person practicing in banking or securities activities;

	4.	being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

	5.	being subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

	6.	being subject of or party to any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization, any registered entity or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Board Independence

We are not required to have any independent members of the Board of Directors. The board of directors has determined that (i) Wu Qiyou, Chen Beihuang and Han Jialiang have relationships which, in the opinion of the board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and each is not an “independent director” as defined in the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market and (ii) He Zhiwei and James Keil are each an independent director as defined in the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of He Zhiwei (Chair) and James J. Keil, each of whom is “independent” as independence is currently defined in applicable SEC rules. The Board has determined that He Zhiwei qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in applicable SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Board made a qualitative assessment of He Zhiwei’s level of knowledge and experience based on a number of factors, including his formal education and experience. The Audit Committee has not yet adopted a formal charter.

Compensation Committee

We do not presently have a compensation committee. Our board of directors currently acts as our compensation committee.

Nominating Committee

We do not presently have a nominating committee. Our board of directors currently acts as our nominating committee.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions

During the last fiscal year, none of our executive officers served on the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity whose executive officers served on our board of directors.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of our company. Directors, officers and greater than 10% shareholders are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us, the officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock have filed their initial statements of ownership on Form 3 on a timely basis, and the officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock have also filed the required Forms 4 or 5 on a timely basis.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides certain summary information concerning compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our Chief Executive Officer for fiscal years 2010 and 2009.

Name & Principal Position	Year	Salary	Bonus	Stock Awards	Option Awards	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen- sation	Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compen- sation Earnings	All Other Compen- sation	Total
		($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)
Wu Qiyou (a)	2010	13,749	—	—	—	—	—	—	13,749
	2009	13,111	—	—	—	—	—	—	13,111
Richard B. Frost (b)	2010	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
	2009	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

	(a)	Mr. Wu was appointed as CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors on November 10, 2010.
	(b)	Mr. Frost resigned as our Chief Executive Officer and President on November 10, 2010.

Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

David Dodge

On March 26, 2010, Taiyang entered into a consulting agreement with David Dodge, an individual, pursuant to which Mr. Dodge was engaged to act as Chief Financial Officer of Taiyang prior to completion of the Share Exchange, and in the same capacity as our Chief Financial Officer upon the closing of the Reverse Merger Transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, Mr. Dodge received 144 shares of Dynamic common stock prior to the closing of the Share Exchange, which were exchanged for 141,894 shares or common stock at the closing of the Share Exchange. The contract also calls for Mr. Dodge to be compensated at a rate of $150 per hour for services performed, with a maximum of $10,000 per month. Mr. Dodge’s employment contract was transferred to us upon the closing of the Reverse Merger Transaction.

Equity Incentive Plan

None.

Option/SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year

None.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table.

None.

Director Compensation

None.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Other than as disclosed below, since January 1, 2008, there have been no transactions or proposed transactions, which have materially affected or will materially affect us in which any director, executive officer or beneficial holder of more than 5% of our outstanding common or preferred stock, or any of their respective relatives, spouses, associates or affiliates, has had or will have any direct or material indirect interest. We have no policy regarding entering into transactions with affiliated parties.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and 2009, amounts due from related parties were comprised of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(unaudited)		(audited)		(audited)
Due from Wu Qiyou	$	—	$	—	$	735,861
Due from Chen Beihuang		—		—		585
Due from Wu Qida		—		—		29,252

	$	—	$	—	$	765,698

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and 2009, amounts due to related parties were comprised of the following:

	September 30,		December 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(unaudited)		(audited)		(audited)
Due to Wu Qiyou	$	—	$	30,249	$	—
Due to Taiyang Biological Corporation		—		—		190,166

	$	—	$	30,249	$	190,166

Wu Qiyou is Taiyang’s founder and principal executive officer and was holder of 96% of Taiyang’s registered share capital prior to the Reverse Merger Transaction in November 2010. Mr. Wu was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors after the Reverse Merger Transaction. Wu Qiyou owns 49% of Taiyang Biological Corporation.

Wu Qida was the holder of 2% of Taiyang’s registered share capital prior to the Reverse Merger Transaction in November 2010, and is also the brother of Wu Qiyou. Wu Qida owns 31% of Taiyang Biological Corporation.

Chen Beihuang was the holder of 2% of Taiyang’s registered share capital prior to the Reverse Merger Transaction in November 2010. Ms. Chen was also appointed as a member of our Board of Directors after the Reverse Merger Transaction.

Taiyang Biological Corporation is a company owned 49% by Wu Qiyou and 31% by Wu Qida.

We were involved in the following transactions with Wu Qiyou, Chen Beihuang and Wu Qida during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

				Chen
	Wu Qiyou			Beihuang			Wu Qida			Total

Balance due (to) from as of December 31, 2008	$	613,802		$	12,839		$	—		$	626,641
Loans to related party		325,637			16,007			29,237			370,881
Repayments from related party		(205,169	)		(28,286	)		—			(233,455	)
Currency translation difference		1,591			25			15			1,631

Balance due (to) from as of December 31, 2009		735,861			585			29,252			765,698

Loans to related party		1,734,976			140,365			708			1,876,049
Repayments from related party		(2,506,692	)		(140,955	)		(30,212	)		(2,677,859	)
Currency translation difference		5,606			5			252			5,863

Balance due (to) from as of December 31, 2010	$	(30,249	)	$	—		$	—		$	(30,249	)

As of December 31, 2010, we had collected all loans due from our officers and directors, and discontinued the practice of lending funds to our officers and directors.

We were involved in the following additional related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we made purchases from Taiyang Biological Corporation in the amount of $118,978 and $52,961, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, we had unused deposits against inventory purchases with Taiyang Biological Corporation in the amount of $90,385.

At closing of the Reverse Merger Transaction, we acquired 145,000 shares of our common stock from three of our previous stockholders and affiliates of for retirement. The aggregate purchase price for the shares was $300,000. The selling shares were: Richard B. Frost, our President and Chief Executive Officer prior to the Reverse Merger Transaction (48,333 shares); Bert L. Gusrae, our Secretary, Treasurer and Director prior to the Reverse Merger Transaction (48,334 shares), and Alicia M. LaSala, our Chief Executive Officer through May 2008 (48,333 shares).

We currently engage Thornhill Capital LLC to perform certain accounting, language translation, and other professional services. Our Chief Financial Officer, David Dodge, also performs contract work unrelated to our company on behalf of Thornhill Capital LLC.

In August 2010, we purchased 7.81% of the equity of a local credit cooperative. As of December 31, 2010, the face value of long term loans payable to the credit cooperative were $190,856 and $90,388, respectively, and the carrying value was $126,428 and $56,117 respectively.

Transactions during the period are reflected at the average exchange rates for the respective period, and balances as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are reflected at closing exchange rates for the respective period. Accordingly, beginning balance plus period transactions may differ from ending balances due to exchange rate differences.

We were involved in the following transactions with Wu Qiyou, Chen Beihuang and Wu Qida during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	Wu			Chen			Wu
	Qiyou			Beihuang			Qida			Total

Balance due (to) from as of December 31, 2010	$	(30,249	)	$	—		$	—		$	(30,249	)
Loans to related party		616,726			10,326			—			627,052
Repayments from related party		(712,741	)		(10,326	)		—			(723,067	)
Currency translation difference		(2,559	)		—			—			(2,559	)

Balance due (to) from as of September 30, 2011	$	(128,823	)	$	—		$	—		$	(128,823	)

Balance due (to) from as of December 31, 2009	$	735,861		$	585		$	29,252		$	765,698
Loans to related party		1,316,384			138,268			704			1,455,356
Repayments from related party		(887,775	)		(138,855	)		—			(1,026,630	)
Currency translation difference		22,852			2			(97	)		22,757

Balance due (to) from as of September 30, 2010	$	1,187,322		$	—		$	29,859		$	1,217,181

On May 11, 2011, our board of directors passed a resolution requiring board approval for all future loans to directors, officers, and any other related or unrelated parties.

We were involved in the following additional related party transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we made purchases from Taiyang Biological Corporation in the amount of $78,286 and $101,623, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we made purchases from Taiyang Biological Corporation in the amount of $21,041 and $70,993, respectively. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had prepayments against inventory purchases with Taiyang Biological Corporation in the amount of $75,175 and $90,385, respectively.

In August 2010, we purchased 7.81% of the equity of a local credit cooperative. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the face value of long term loans payable to the credit cooperative were $197,527 and $190,856, respectively, and the carrying value was $145,306 and $126,428 respectively. We also had a short term loan payable to the credit cooperative in the amount of $1,565,313 as of September 30, 2011.

Transactions during the period are reflected at the average exchange rates for the respective period, and balances as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are reflected at closing exchange rates for the respective period. Accordingly, beginning balance plus period transactions may differ from ending balances due to exchange rate differences.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 9, 2012 , and as adjusted to reflect the sale of shares of common stock offered by this prospectus by:

●	each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;
●	each of our named executive officers and directors; and
●	all of our officers and directors as a group.

NAME AND ADDRESS

OF OWNER (1)

TITLE OF

CLASS

NUMBER OF

SHARES OWNED (2)

PERCENTAGE OF CLASS PRIOR TO

OFFERING (3)

PERCENTAGE OF CLASS AFTER

OFFERING (4)

Wu Qiyou (5)

Common Stock

Chen Beihuang (5)

Common Stock

Han Jialiang

Common Stock

He Zhiwei

Common Stock

James J. Keil

Common Stock

David Dodge

Common Stock

All Officers and Directors as a Group (6 persons)

Common Stock

Firm Success International, Ltd. (5)

Common Stock

4,686,990

44.89

40.47

Zhang Jingjie

Common Stock

560,726

5.37

4.84

* Less than 1%.

(1) Unless otherwise noted, the mailing address of each beneficial owner is c/o Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc., No. 88 Eastern Outer Ring Road, Ningguo City, Anhui Province, PRC 242300.

(2) Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of January 9, 2012 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such option or warrant but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.

(3) Percentage based upon 10,440,033 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of January 9, 2012 .

(4) Percentage based upon 11,582,429 shares of common stock issued and outstanding upon the completion of the offering and assumes that all shares registered hereunder are sold.

(5) Phong Sae-Ia is the owner of 100% of the capital stock of Firm Success International, Ltd. Phong Sae-Ia’s ownership in Firm Success International, Ltd. is subject to a Call Option Agreement between Phong Sae-Ia and Wu Qiyou, pursuant to which Wu Qiyou has been granted an option to acquire 100% of Phong Sae-Ia’s ownership in Firm Success International. The option vests over a three year period, of which 34% is currently vested, 33% vests on April 2, 2012 and 33% vests on April 2, 2013. The option expires on May 24, 2015.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

COMMON STOCK

We are authorized to issue up to 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001. As of January 9, 2012 , there were 10,440,033 shares of common stock outstanding. Holders of the common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. Upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of our company, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets which are legally available for distribution after payment of all debts and other liabilities and liquidation preference of any outstanding common stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights.

The transfer agent of our common stock is Corporate Stock Transfer Inc., 3200 Cherry Creek South Dr., Suite 430, Denver, Colorado 80209.

PREFERRED STOCK

We are authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, none of which are currently outstanding. The shares of preferred stock may be issued in series, and shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative participating, optional or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such stock adopted from time to time by the board of directors. The board of directors is expressly vested with the authority to determine and fix in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuances of preferred stock the voting powers, designations, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of each such series to the full extent now or hereafter permitted by the laws of the State of Delaware.

OPTIONS

None.

WARRANTS

In connection with the Old Financing, we issued warrants to purchase 726,348 shares of Common Stock. In addition, we issued warrants to the placement agent to purchase 226,298 shares of Common Stock. In connection with the New Financing, we issued warrants to purchase 143,750 shares of Common Stock. In addition, we issued warrants to the placement agent to purchase 46,000 shares of Common Stock.

Each warrant has an exercise price of $4.00 per share of Common Stock and subject to a call provision if the closing bid price of our common stock equals or exceeds $8.00 per share for five consecutive trading days, subject to our common stock being traded on either the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq or NYSE Euronext and their being an effective registration statement for the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants. The warrants are exercisable for a period of three years from the date of issuance. The placement agent warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis.

CONVERTIBLE SECURITIES

None.

INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

Our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provide to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, our directors or officers shall not be personally liable to us or our shareholders for damages for breach of such director’s or officer’s fiduciary duty. The effect of this provision of our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, is to eliminate our rights and our shareholders (through shareholders’ derivative suits on behalf of our company) to recover damages against a director or officer for breach of the fiduciary duty of care as a director or officer (including breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent behavior), except under certain situations defined by statute. We believe that the indemnification provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act” or “Securities Act”) may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

Each Selling Stockholder (the “Selling Stockholders”) of the common stock and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock covered hereby on the principal Trading Market or any other stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale, or negotiated prices. A Selling Stockholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:

·	ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

·	block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

·	purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

·	an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

·	privately negotiated transactions;

·	settlement of short sales entered into after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part;

·	in transactions through broker-dealers that agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;

·	through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;

·	a combination of any such methods of sale; or

·	any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The Selling Stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), if available, rather than under this prospectus.

Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and, in the case of a principal transaction, a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.

In connection with the sale of the common stock or interests therein, the Selling Stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Stockholders may also sell shares of the common stock short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions or to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales, or loan or pledge the common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or create one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

The Selling Stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Each Selling Stockholder has informed the Company that it does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the Common Stock. In no event shall any broker-dealer receive fees, commissions and markups which, in the aggregate, would exceed eight percent (8%).

The following selling stockholders are deemed an “underwriter” as that term is defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of such acts, in connection with the sale of their common stock under this prospectus: Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd., a registered broker-dealer; Charles Morgan Securities, Inc., a registered broker-dealer; Corinthian Partners, LLC, a registered broker-dealer; Buff Trust, Garnet Trust, Laidlaw Holdings Plc, Craig Bonn, Robert N Rotunno, Robert J Bonaventura, Hugh J. Marasa Jr., Joseph Fedorko, Stephen Hamilton, Bruce Porter, Peter Malone, Evan Stern, Francis R. Smith, Ryan Turcotte, Brian Schantz, Edward Flynn, Lewis Mason, Harvey Kohn, Brian Frank, Christopher K. Henderson, Mitch Manoff and Richard Calabrese; all of whom are employees or affiliates of Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd., Charles Morgan Securities, Inc., or Corinthian Partners, LLC. With the exception of the foregoing, no other underwriter or person has been engaged to facilitate the sale of shares of common stock in this offering.

The Company is required to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by the Company incident to the registration of the shares. The Company has agreed to indemnify the Selling Stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

The Selling Stockholders will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act including Rule 172 thereunder, unless an exemption therefrom is available.

The Selling Stockholders have advised us that there is no underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with the proposed sale of the resale shares by the Selling Stockholders.

We agreed to keep this prospectus effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the shares may be resold by the Selling Stockholders without volume restrictions under Rule 144 or (ii) all of the shares have been sold pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect. The resale shares will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale shares of Common Stock covered hereby may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of the common stock by the Selling Stockholders or any other person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the Selling Stockholders and have informed them of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).

There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell any or all of the shares of common stock registered pursuant to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

Once sold under the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, the shares of common stock will be freely tradable in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

The table below sets forth information concerning the resale of the shares of common stock by the selling stockholders. We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the common stock by the selling stockholders. We will receive proceeds from the exercise of the warrants. Assuming all the shares registered below are sold by the selling stockholders, none of the selling stockholders will continue to own any shares of our common stock.

The following table also sets forth the name of each person who is offering the resale of shares of common stock by this prospectus, the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person, the number of shares of common stock that may be sold in this offering and the number of shares of common stock each person will own after the offering, assuming they sell all of the shares offered.

	Beneficial Ownership Prior to this Offering (1)					Beneficial Ownership After this Offering (2)
Selling Stockholder	Number of Shares	Percent of Class	Shares That May be Offered and Sold Hereby			Number of Shares	Percent of Class
Roger Conan	25,000	*		25,000	(24)	0		0%
Michael & Sheila Carroll JTWROS	93,750	*		93,750	(24)	0		0%
Juan Aguilar	16,875	*		16,875	(24)	0		0%
Steven Kaye	10,000	*		10,000	(24)	0		0%
Pamela Chan TOD	20,000	*		20,000	(24)	0		0%
S. Alexi Gitter	20,000	*		20,000	(24)	0		0%
James & Joanne Shapland JTWROS	20,000	*		20,000	(24)	0		0%
Richard & Michelle Starkey JTWROS	20,000	*		20,000	(24)	0		0%
Nina M. Dougar Defined Benefit Plan, Nina M. Dougar TTEE	30,000	*		30,000	(24)	0		0%
Timothy and Annette Kane JTWROS	30,000	*		30,000	(24)	0		0%
Sterne Agee & Leach Inc C/F Ermina Curcio SEP IRA	20,000	*		20,000	(24)	0		0%
Michael Rieber	125,000	1.19%		125,000	(24)	0		0%
Sterne Agee & Leach Inc C/F Roger K. Cady R/O IRA	30,000	*		30,000	(24)	0		0%
Gross Foundation Inc. (3)	31,250	*		31,250	(24)	0		0%
Claus Skrumsager	125,000	1.19%		125,000	(24)	0		0%
Bohdan Chaban	100,000	*		100,000	(24)	0		0%
Goodway Technologies Corp. (4)	30,000	*		30,000	(24)	0		0%
Chris Nicolaes	27,500	*		27,500	(24)	0		0%
Richard Levine	15,625	*		15,625	(24)	0		0%
Rama Subramaniam	62,500	*		62,500	(24)	0		0%

BWCI Pension Trustees Limited as Trustees of the Deferred Retirement Annuity Trust Scheme a/c BWCI 1123/055 (5)	187,500	1.79%	187,500	(24)	0%
Thomas & Suzanne Hansbauer TOD JTWROS	15,000	*	15,000	(24)	0%
Jordeline Inc. (6)	62,500	*	62,500	(24)	0%
Jeff Tarumianz	18,750	*	18,750	(24)	0%
Jeffrey Jakubiak Revocable Living Trust	125,000	1.19%	125,000	(24)	0%
The Squan LLC (7)	250,000	2.38%	250,000	(24)	0%
Scott Boggio	45,830	*	45,830	(25)	0%
Meltronics Resources Partners (8)	91,665	*	91,665	(26)	0%
Richard Cohen	137,500	1.32%	137,500	(27)	0%
Guy Billups	183,330	1.75%	183,330	(28)	0%
Roderic L. Prat	275,000	2.63%	275,000	(29)	0%
Walter Billups	91,665	*	91,665	(26)	0%
Michael Powell	156,250	1.49%	156,250	(24)	0%
Kathleen Kern	62,500	*	62,500	(24)	0%
Chestnut Ridge Partners, LP (9)	187,500	1.79%	187,500	(24)	0%
Andrew Black	46,875	*	46,875	(24)	0%
John & Kathleen Ullmann JTWROS	31,250	*	31,250	(24)	0%
Paul Egeland	31,250	*	31,250	(24)	0%
Mark J. Brosso	91,665	*	91,665	(26)	0%
Charles L. Weidner TTEE & Alice N. Barrett Weidner TTEE FBO The Weidner Family Revocable Trust DTD 8/13/7	15,625	*	15,625	(24)	0%
Paul Van de Ven	7,425	*	7,425	(24)	0%
Dale R. Broughton	4,800	*	4,800	(24)	0%
Tom Ayala	2,500	*	2,500	(24)	0%
Sterne Agee & Leach Inc C/F Dale R. Broughton IRA	2,475	*	2,475	(24)	0%
Neil T. Anderson	91,665	*	91,665	(26)	0%
Emmanuel Baud	3,695	*	3,695	(24)	0%
Paul E. Taboada	30,000	*	30,000	(24)	0%
Elsie S. Taboada	15,000	*	15,000	(24)	0%
Fortbenton Laboratories S.A. Inc. (10)	218,750	2.09%	218,750	(24)	0%
Mike Mackie	2,065	*	2,065	(24)	0%
Gavin Young	4,950	*	4,950	(24)	0%
Cranshire Capital LP (11)	31,250	*	31,250	(24)	0%
Carl Azar	15,000	*	15,000	(24)	0%
Alpha Capital Anstalt (12)	368,750	3.52%	368,750	(24)	0%
Whalehaven Capital Fund Limited (13)	450,000	4.29%	450,000	(24)	0%
Osher Capital (14)	50,000	*	50,000		0%
Ken Winfield	6,250	*	6,250	(24)	0%
Daniel T. Guilfoile	56,329	*	56,329	(30)	0%
Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd. (15)	157,776	1.50%	157,776	(31)	0%
Adventure Ventures LLC (16)	31,250	*	31,250	(24)	0%
4246691 Canada Inc. (17)	15,610	*	15,610	(24)	0%
Lance Friedman	61,069	*	61,069	(32)	0%
Eric Van Hoof SPRL (18)	4,625	*	4,625	(24)	0%
Denis O’Brien	156,250	1.49%	156,250	(24)	0%
Carlos Castillo, Jr.	250,000	2.38%	250,000	(24)	0%

Scott J. Sokol	31,250	*	31,250	(24)	0%
Oliver Takacs	62,500	*	62,500	(24)	0%
Bemasek Holdings Limited (20)	312,500	2.98%	312,500	(24)	0%
Joseph A. Cox, III	31,250	*	31,250	(24)	0%
John B. Burt	334	*	334		0%
Richard T. Burt	5,001	*	5,001		0%
Nathan W. Dean and Mary F. Dean, JTWROS	6,667	*	6,667		0%
Rachel Frost	334	*	334		0%
Richard B. Frost	68,334	*	68,334		0%
Armen Guendjoian and Beth Guendjoianm, JTWROS	334	*	334		0%
Bert L. Gusrae	35,000	*	35,000		0%
Wendy Tand Gusrae	334	*	334		0%
Dianne S. Kennedy	8,334	*	8,334		0%
Teddy Klinghoffer and Sherri Klinghoffer, Ten Ent	667	*	667		0%
Steven Lach	3,267	*	3,267		0%
Alicia M. LaSala	51,670	*	51,670		0%
Rebecca N. Lozano	8,334	*	8,334		0%
Roslyn K. Malmaud	334	*	334		0%
Frank Pellegrino	33,334	*	33,334		0%
Mark Robson	334	*	334		0%
Alan D. Sackrin	3,334	*	3,334		0%
Alfred Schiffrin	50,000	*	50,000		0%
C. Leo Smith	37,734	*	37,734		0%
Lee V. Twyford	667	*	667		0%
Buff Trust	32,453	*	32,453	(33)	0%
Garnet Trust	32,453	*	32,453	(33)	0%
Laidlaw Holdings Plc (21)	10,256	*	10,256	(33)	0%
Craig Bonn	263	*	263	(33)	0%
Robert N Rotunno	175	*	175	(33)	0%
Robert J Bonaventura	777	*	777	(33)	0%
Hugh J. Marasa Jr.	777	*	777	(33)	0%
Joseph Fedorko	3,360	*	3,360	(33)	0%
Stephen Hamilton	4,460	*	4,460	(33)	0%
Bruce Porter	1,050	*	1,050	(33)	0%
Peter Malone	333	*	333	(33)	0%
Evan Stern	332	*	332	(33)	0%
Francis R. Smith	3,500	*	3,500	(33)	0%
Ryan Turcotte	2,000	*	2,000	(33)	0%
Charles Morgan Securities, Inc. (22)	2,460	*	2,460	(33)	0%
Corinthian Partners, LLC (23)	7,000	*	7,000	(33)	0%
Brian Schantz	1,200	*	1,200	(33)	0%
Edward Flynn	1,200	*	1,200	(33)	0%
Lewis Mason	3,200	*	3,200	(33)	0%
Harvey Kohn	3,200	*	3,200	(33)	0%
Brian Frank	3,200	*	3,200	(33)	0%
Christopher K. Henderson	2,000	*	2,000	(33)	0%
Mitch Manoff	11,500	*	11,500	(33)	0%
Richard Calabrese	11,500	*	11,500	(33)	0%

Li Bogang	59,046	*	59,046	0%
Xu Tie	1,869	*	1,869	0%
Zhang Jingjie	560,726	5.37%	560,726	0%
Yang Hao	9,460	*	9,460	0%
Chang Yengfang	9,460	*	9,460	0%
Mara Jacobs	25,000	*	25,000	0%
Mark Sourian	25,000	*	25,000	0%
Silvano Marchetto	50,000	*	50,000	0%
TOTALS	6,627,696	57.22%	6,627,696	0%

* Less than 1%.

(1)	Percentage calculated on the basis of 10,440,033 shares of common stock outstanding on January 9, 2012 .

(2)	Percentage calculated on the basis of 11,582,429 shares of common stock outstanding upon the completion of this offering and assumes the sale of all shares of common stock registered pursuant to this prospectus, although the selling stockholders are under no obligations known to us to sell any shares of common stock at this time.

(3)	Chiam Gross has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(4)	Timothy Kane has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(5)	G. P. McGee and P. N. Hanna have voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(6)	Richard Pilosof has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(7)	Jeffrey Jakubiak has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(8)	Paul Melchiorne has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(9)	Kenneth Pasternak has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(10)	Laura E. Smith has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(11)	Downsview Capital, Inc. (“Downsview”) is the general partner of Cranshire Capital, L.P. (“Cranshire”) and consequently has voting control and investment discretion over securities held by Cranshire. Mitchell P. Kopin (“Mr. Kopin”), President of Downsview, has voting control over Downsview. As a result of the foregoing, each of Mr. Kopin and Downsview may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by Cranshire.

(12)	Konrad Ackerman has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(13)	Eric Weisblum has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(14)	Ari Kluger has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(15)	Hugh Regan has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(16)	Ari Kluger has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(17)	Michael Quinn has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(18)	Eric Van Hoof has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(19)	[RESERVED]

(20)	Valeris Huxley has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(21)	Hugh Regan has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(22)	Paul E. Taboada has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(23)	Richard Calabrese has voting and investment control over shares held by this entity.

(24)	20% of such total shares represent shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(25)	Includes 4,166 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(26)	Includes 8,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(27)	Includes 12,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(28)	Includes 16,666 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(29)	Includes 25,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(30)	Includes 46,501 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(31)	Includes 68,004 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(32)	Includes 47,449 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

(33)	Represents shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants.

Reverse Merger Transaction

In connection with the share exchange agreement dated November 10, 2010, we granted piggyback registration rights to our existing stockholders, of which an aggregate of 314,347 shares are included in this prospectus. These shares were purchased from us in private placement transactions from time to time since our inception.

November 2010 Private Placement

In November 2010, we sold to certain accredited investors 638,434 units for aggregate cash gross proceeds of $5,107,472, at a price of $8.00 per unit and the exchange of $549,984 in previously issued debentures that were converted into 91,664 units at a price of $6.00 per unit. Each united consisted of four (4) shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase one (1) share. In addition, we issued placement agent warrants to acquire 226,298 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $4.00 per share. The shares issued to the investors in this financing, as well as the shares underlying the warrants issued to the investors and the placement agent, are included in this prospectus.

March 2011 Private Placement

In March 2011, we sold to certain accredited investors 143,750 units for aggregate cash gross proceeds of $1,150,000, at a price of $8.00 per unit. Each united consisted of four (4) shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase one (1) share. In addition, we issued placement agent warrants to acquire 46,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $4.00 per share. The shares issued to the investors in this financing, as well as the shares underlying the warrants issued to the investors and the placement agent, are included in this prospectus.

LEGAL MATTERS

Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP, New York, New York will issue an opinion with respect to the validity of the shares of common stock being offered hereby.

EXPERTS

Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, have audited, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, our financial statements at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended that appear in the prospectus. The financial statements referred to above are included in this prospectus with reliance upon the independent registered public accounting firm’s opinion based on their expertise in accounting and auditing.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to the shares of common stock being offered by this prospectus, and reference is made to such registration statement. This prospectus constitutes the prospectus of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc., filed as part of the registration statement, and it does not contain all information in the registration statement, as certain portions have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which requires us to file reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports, proxy statements and other information may be inspected at public reference facilities of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. Because we file documents electronically with the SEC, you may also obtain this information by visiting the SEC’s Internet website at http://www.sec.gov.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ANHUI TAIYANG POULTRY CO., INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income	F-3
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-4 to F-5
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	F-6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7 to F-51

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-52
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income	F-53
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-54 to F-55
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	F-56
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	F-57 to F-98

Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp

chartered accountants

licensed public accountants

toronto · montreal

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc.

(Formerly The Parkview Group, Inc.)

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for each of the years then ended (as restated – see Note 24). These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financing reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

Readers should refer to Note 24 which set out the details of the restatements to the 2010 and 2009 financial statements as previously reported.

/s/ SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP

Toronto, Ontario, Canada		Chartered Accountants
April 14, 2011, except for notes 4, 14(b), 14(c), 22(b), 24, 25(b) and		Licensed Public Accountants
related disclosures which is as of January 18, 2012

F-1

Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. (formerly The Parkview Group, Inc., see note 1(a))

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Expressed in United States Dollars)

	As of December 31,
	2010		2009
	(Restated -		(Restated -
	see note 24)		see note 24)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,930,319	$	605,392
Trade accounts receivable, net (note 3)		5,348,650		972,528
Loans receivable (note 4)		4,268,057		2,816,943
Inventories, net (note 5)		1,762,709		1,787,565
Prepaid and other current assets (note 6)		1,140,234		902,361
Proceeds receivable from sale of fertilizer plant (note 18)		889,174

ANHUI TAIYANG POULTRY CO INC S-1/A