2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Use of Estimates	Use of Estimates In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenditures during the reported periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents	Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company did not have any cash or cash equivalents at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15 Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern. In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity's management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management's evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management's plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management's plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes): a. Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management's plans) b. Management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity's ability to meet its obligations c. Management's plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management's plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following: a. Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern b. Management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity's ability to meet its obligations c. Management's plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. We do not expect the effective implementation of this ASU, beginning in fiscal 2017, to materially impact future disclosures. In February 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation. Under current GAAP we may be required to consolidate another legal entity in situations in which our contractual rights do not give us the ability to act primarily on our own behalf, we do not hold a majority of the legal entity's voting rights, or we are not exposed to a majority of the legal entity's economic benefits or obligations. The Standards Update amends the GAAP to require that all legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments: 1. Modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities 2. Eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership 3. Affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships 4. Provide a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. We do not believe this updated consolidation guidance will have a material impact on our future financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, at least until we enter a business combination agreement, if any. In April 2015 the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest. The Standards Update requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. We do not believe this updated presentation requirement will have a material impact on our future financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. There have been no other recently issued accounting pronouncements through the date of this report that the Company believes will have a material impact on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Disclosure of accounting policy for cash and cash equivalents, including the policy for determining which items are treated as cash equivalents. Other information that may be disclosed includes (1) the nature of any restrictions on the entity's use of its cash and cash equivalents, (2) whether the entity's cash and cash equivalents are insured or expose the entity to credit risk, (3) the classification of any negative balance accounts (overdrafts), and (4) the carrying basis of cash equivalents (for example, at cost) and whether the carrying amount of cash equivalents approximates fair value.

+ References+ Details

Kaeland Resources Corp 10-Q