UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☑

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022 or

☐

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-166711-01

Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity: 0001536226

UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1

(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001258361

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

(exact name of the depositor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541886

UBS Real Estate Securities Inc.

(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001542256

Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC

(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)

New York
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization of

the issuing entity)

86-1073506

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Numbers)

c/o Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas

as Certificate Administrator

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA

(Address of principal executive offices of the issuing entity)

92705

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(212) 816-6000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☑ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☑ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☑	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-~~Oxlet~~Oxley Act (15U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared ofor issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☑ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Omitted.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Omitted.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Omitted.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Omitted.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Omitted.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Omitted.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Omitted.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Omitted.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Omitted.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Omitted.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Omitted.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

Item 9C. Disclosure regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Omitted. The issuing entity does not have any executive officers or directors.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Omitted. The issuing entity does not have any executive officers or directors.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Omitted. The issuing entity does not have any executive officers or directors.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Omitted. The issuing entity does not have any executive officers or directors.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Omitted.

ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB

Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.

Each of (i) the property securing the Trinity Centre Mortgage Loan and (ii) the property securing the Poughkeepsie Galleria Mortgage Loan constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item 1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB and as disclosed in the Prospectus Supplement for UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1 filed on December 28, 2011 (Commission FIle No. 333-166711-01). The Trinity Centre Mortgage Loan was defeased on November 6, 2015. With respect to the Poughkeepsie Galleria Mortgage Loan, based on information provided by the Poughkeepsie Galleria Mortgage Loan Borrower, the unaudited net operating income for the twelve month period ending December 31, ~~2021~~2022 for the Poughkeepsie Galleria Mortgaged Property was $109,~~397~~748,~~332~~269.11

Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant Enhancement Provider Financial Information.

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external credit enhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivatives Instruments (Financial Information).

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any derivative instruments for the certificates within this transaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.

Disclosure from Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, as certificate administrator and as custodian:

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts.

On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed an action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging that DBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties, as trustees for 544 private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations and warranties as to mortgage loans held by the trusts and to enforce breaches by servicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from New York State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRock SDNY Case”) and the other in the Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “BlackRock California Case”). Pursuant to a settlement among the parties, the BlackRock SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018, and the BlackRock California Case was dismissed on January 11, 2019.

On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of New York’s Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On October 27, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a supplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’ standing. On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which it granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s supplemental motion for summary judgment, granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s initial motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order, all of plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice. On March 10, 2022, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with respect to the court’s orders on the motions to dismiss and for summary judgment.

On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which it granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. As a result of that order, many of plaintiffs’ claims and theories were dismissed with prejudice. Discovery is ongoing.

On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKB voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims as to seven trusts. On January 27, 2021, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the TIA. The court denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss. IKB’s remaining claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed. On May 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, regarding certain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. ~~That appeal has been fully briefed.~~ On May 20, 2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with respect to other aspects of that order. ~~That~~On August 30, 2022, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department affirmed in part and reversed in part the court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On November 10, 2022, the First Department granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for leave to appeal isto ~~being~~the Court ~~briefed~~of Appeals, and denied IKB’s separate motion for reargument and leave to appeal. On June 2, 2021, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss, which the court denied on August 3, 2021. On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint. On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additional trusts. On December 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to one additional trust. On April 22, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to 17 certificates at issue (including all claims as to 5 trusts), leaving 17 trusts at issue. Discovery is ongoing.

It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties under the related servicing agreement for this transaction.

Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

The information regarding this Item has been previously provided in the Prospectus Supplement relating to UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1 filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5) on December 28, 2011 (Commission File No. 333-166711-01).

Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.

See Item 15, Exhibits 33 and 34.

The report on assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria furnished pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB by KeyBank National Association ("KeyBank") discloses that a material instance of noncompliance occurred, as described below:

1) Servicing Criteria impacted

1122(d)(4)(ix) -Adjustments to interest rates or rates of return for pool assets with variable rates are computed based on the related pool asset documents.

2) Material Instance of Noncompliance with Servicing Criteria

During compliance testing, it was discovered, that not all FlexARM loan mortgagors were offered loan rates within 45-60 days before the rate change date, as required per the related pool asset documents. Per the Note, if the holder fails to offer a loan rate within 45-60 days of any change date a margin of 2.25% is to be used. Given the notification was not made to the borrowers, a 3% margin was incorrectly applied. The noncompliance in Item 1122 (d)(4)(ix) is related to a servicing portfolio which is wholly owned by the investor and is not held in a publicly traded security. The identified material instance of noncompliance with servicing criteria did not involve the servicing of the assets backing the asset-backed securities covered in this Form 10-K.

3) Remediation

The following remediation procedures have been initiated by KeyBank: (i) the impacted mortgage loans are currently in the process of being identified, (ii) investor contact has been initiated, (iii) corrective actions are being considered and will be tracked and monitored by senior management, (iv) procedures will be reviewed and revised, if necessary, to include new tracking and action steps to prevent this situation from recurring in the future, and (v) training will be provided to the relevant staff members to prevent a recurrence.

Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.

See Item 15, Exhibit 35.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

(3) See below

Exhibit

Number Description

4.1

Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2011, by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC (as successor to Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association), as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (formerly known as Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agent and custodian. (Exhibit 4.1 was filed as part of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2011 (Commission File No. 333-166711-01) and is incorporated by reference herein.)

4.2

Amendment Number 1 To Pooling And Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2012, by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC (as successor to Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association), as special servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agent and custodian, and TriMont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (formerly known as Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), as operating advisor. (Exhibit 4.2 was filed as part of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 29, 2013 (Commission File No. 333-166711-01) and is incorporated by reference herein.)

10.1

Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2011, between UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. and Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., pursuant to which UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. sold certain mortgage loans to Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. (Exhibit 10.1 was filed as part of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011 (Commission File No. 333-166711-01) and is incorporated by reference herein.)

10.2

Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2011, between Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC and Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., pursuant to which Natixis Real Estate Capital LLC sold certain mortgage loans to Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. (Exhibit 10.2 was filed as part of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011 (Commission File No. 333-166711-01) and is incorporated by reference herein.)

10.3

Primary Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2011, between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as primary servicer. (Exhibit 10.3 was filed as part of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2011 (Commission File No. 333-166711-01) and is incorporated by reference herein.)

10.4

Primary Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2011, between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, and KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as primary servicer. (Exhibit 10.3 was filed as part of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed on January 26, 2015 (Commission File No. 333-166711-01) and is incorporated by reference herein.)

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.

33.1 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as master servicer, Annual Report on Assessment of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022.

33.2 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, N.A., as primary servicer, Annual Report on Assessment of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022.

33.3 Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer, Annual Report on Assessment of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

33.4 Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, custodian and certificate administrator, Annual Report on Assessment of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

33.5 Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (formerly known as Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), as operating advisor, Annual Report on Assessment of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

33.6 CoreLogic Solutions LLC, as servicing function participant, Annual Report on Assessment of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

33.7 KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as primary servicer, Annual Report on Assessment of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities.

34.1 Attestation Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as master servicer, for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

34.2 Attestation Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, N.A., as primary servicer, for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

34.3 Attestation Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

34.4 Attestation Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, custodian and certificate administrator, for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

34.5 Attestation Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (formerly known as Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), as operating advisor, Report for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

34.6 Attestation Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as servicing function participant, for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

34.7 Attestation Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria for KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as primary servicer, for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

Servicer compliance statements.

35.1 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as master servicer, Annual Statement of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

35.2 Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, N.A., as primary servicer, Annual Statement of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

35.3 Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC., as special servicer, Annual Statement of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

35.4 Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as certificate administrator, Annual Statement of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

35.5 KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as primary servicer, Annual Statement of Compliance for the year ended December 31, ~~2021~~2022

(b) The exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.
(Depositor)

/s/ Richard Simpson

Richard Simpson

Title: President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

Date: March 29, ~~2022~~2023

Filing Compare · UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2011-C1