ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES [Abstract]

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company

Whitemark Homes, Inc. ("Whitemark" or the "Company") was incorporated on July 30, 1975 under the laws of the State of Colorado. On April 1, 2000, Whitemark disposed of its prior business operations and acquired Whitemark Homes, Inc. ("Whitemark Florida") along with certain related entities (the "Whitemark Group") in a transaction accounted for as a reverse acquisition. Whitemark Florida changed its name to Whitemark Homes of Florida, Inc. and the Company changed its name to Whitemark Homes, Inc. Effective September 30, 2007, the Company discontinued its real estate development operations.

Principles of Consolidation and Going Concern

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The consolidated financial statements include the Company and its wholly-owned inactive subsidiaries, Whitemark Homes of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, which wholly owns Home Funding, Inc, a Florida corporation. White Homes of Florida, Inc. also holds a 99% interest in two inactive Florida limited liability partnerships; Whitemark at Fox Glen, Ltd. and Sheeler Hills Ltd. and a wholly-owned interest in four limited liability companies; Whitemark at Oak Park, LLC, Whitemark at Corner Lake, LLC, Whitemark at Glenbrook, LLC, and Whitemark at Little Creek. LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss and net cash used in operations of $212,331 and $12,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011 and a working capital deficiency, accumulated deficit, and a stockholders' deficit of $723,759, $28,058,711, and $723,759, respectively, at December 31, 2011. In addition, the Company is inactive as of December 31, 2011, currently has no operations or sources of revenue and is in default on certain promissory notes. . These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company's ability to further implement its business plan which involves identifying a merger with an operating company, raise additional capital, and generate revenues. Currently, management is seeking capital to implement its business plan. Management believes that the actions presently being taken provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. Significant estimates in the 2011 and 2010 periods include the valuation of deferred tax assets and the valuation of the beneficial conversion features on convertible debt.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASC Topic 820 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

·	Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.

Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

·	Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, notes payable, and amounts due to related parties approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company did not identify any assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 820.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company performs certain credit evaluation procedures and does not require collateral for financial instruments subject to credit risk. The Company maintains its cash in accounts with major financial institutions in the United States. Deposits in these banks may exceed the amounts of insurance provided on such deposits. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, there was $5,380 and $5,380, respectively, held in an escrow account maintained by the Company's attorney and bank deposits did not exceed federally insured limits. Historically, the Company has not experienced any losses on our deposits of cash.

Income Taxes

The Company is governed by the Income Tax Law of the United States. The Company utilizes ASC Topic 740, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company applied the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, "Accounting For Uncertainty In Income Taxes", which provides clarification related to the process associated with accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in our financial statements. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Company's liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to the Company's results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, management believes the Company had no material uncertain tax positions, and will continue to evaluate for uncertain positions in the future.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based instruments issued to employees in accordance with ASC Topic 718. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity based compensation issued to employees. The Company accounts for non-employee share-based awards in accordance with ASC Topic 505-50.

Advertising

Advertising is expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not incur advertising expenses.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. For years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not incur research and development costs.

Net Loss per Share of Common Stock

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during each period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of common shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible promissory notes (using the if-converted method). All potentially dilutive common shares were excluded from the computation of diluted shares outstanding as they would have an anti-dilutive impact on the Company's net losses and consisted of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
Convertible notes		211,842,916		156,994,733
Total		211,842,916		156,994,733

These common stock equivalents may be dilutive in the future. The Company's authorized number of shares of common stock is limited to 100,000,000 common shares and 97,962,131 were outstanding at December 31, 2011; only 2,037,869 additional shares are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2011.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standard Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2010-06, "Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements". ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and a higher level of disaggregation for the different types of financial instruments. For the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements, information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements are presented separately. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of revised Level 3 disclosure requirements which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Comparative disclosures are not required in the year of adoption. The Company adopted the provisions of the standard on January 1, 2010, which did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. This amendment addresses both the interaction of the requirements of this Topic with the SEC's reporting requirements and the intended breadth of the reissuance disclosure provision related to subsequent events (paragraph 855-10-50-4). All of the amendments in this Update are effective upon issuance of the final Update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have an important impact on the Company's financial statements.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The amendments in this Update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entity's first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this Update. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-11 did not have any effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Earlier application is permitted. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-13 did not have an effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs," which did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Presentation of Comprehensive Income." Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity has two options for presenting its total comprehensive income: to present total comprehensive income and its components along with the components of net income in a single continuous statement, or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments in this ASU are required to be applied retrospectively and are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 will not have any material impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This Accounting Standards Update amends FASB ASC Topic 350. This amendment specifies the change in method for determining the potential impairment of goodwill. It includes examples of circumstances and events that the entity should consider in evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption does not have any material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the organization, consolidation and basis of presentation of financial statements disclosure, and significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. May be provided in more than one note to the financial statements, as long as users are provided with an understanding of (1) the significant judgments and assumptions made by an enterprise in determining whether it must consolidate a VIE and/or disclose information about its involvement with a VIE, (2) the nature of restrictions on a consolidated VIE's assets reported by an enterprise in its statement of financial position, including the carrying amounts of such assets, (3) the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with an enterprise's involvement with the VIE, and (4) how an enterprise's involvement with the VIE affects the enterprise's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Describes procedure if disclosures are provided in more than one note to the financial statements.

+ References+ Details

WHITEMARK HOMES INC 10-K/A