UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003

Commission File No. 0-20947

ON-SITE SOURCING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE		54 -1648470
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

832 North Henry Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(Address of principal executive offices)

(703) 276-1123
(Registrant’s telephone number)

NONE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of November 10, 2003:

Common Stock, $.01 par value

5,599,225 shares

ON-SITE SOURCING, INC.

INDEX

Part I.	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2003 (unaudited) and December 31, 2002

	Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited) and 2002 (unaudited)

	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited) and 2002 (unaudited)

	Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Liquidity

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

Part II.	Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 5.	Other Information

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

	Signatures

ON-SITE SOURCING, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30, 2003			December 31, 2002
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	4,729		$	4,279
Accounts receivable, net	8,757,928			8,157,822
Prepaid supplies	372,533			503,693
Prepaid expenses	269,064			288,469
Deferred tax asset	104,610			104,608
Notes receivable	12,748			48,442
Total current assets	9,521,612			9,107,313

Property and equipment, net	11,220,462			14,894,103

OTHER ASSETS
Assets held for sale	1,425,000			—
Goodwill	648,443			648,443
Income taxes refundable	—			606,134
Deferred tax asset, net of current portion	257,825			—
Other assets	159,218			152,767
Total assets	$	23,232,560		$	25,408,760

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Line of credit	$	2,129,828		$	2,861,414
Current portion of long-term debt	1,016,357			1,101,706
Accounts payable	1,683,049			1,987,302
Income tax payable	64,598			—
Accrued and other liabilities	1,551,730			1,238,028
Total current liabilities	6,445,562			7,188,450

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Long-term debt, net of current portion	5,770,502			6,897,100
Deferred rent	256,613			257,747
Deferred tax liability	—			266,846
Interest rate swap contract liability	820,156			913,306
Total liabilities	13,292,833			15,523,449

Commitments and contingencies

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized 5,712,815 and 5,589,240 shares issued and 5,599,225 and 5,475,650 outstanding, at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively	57,128			55,892
Additional paid-in capital	8,071,992			7,882,313
Other comprehensive loss	(495,293		)	(551,545		)
Treasury stock (113,590 shares of common stock at cost)	(396,152		)	(396,152		)
Retained earnings	2,702,052			2,894,803
Total stockholders’ equity	9,939,727			9,885,311
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	23,232,560		$	25,408,760

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ON-SITE SOURCING, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2003			September 30, 2002			September 30, 2003			September 30, 2002

Revenue	$	8,927,188		$	8,041,715		$	25,816,187		$	26,073,964

Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales	5,631,429			5,265,760			16,658,403			15,442,342
	3,295,759			2,775,955			9,157,784			10,631,622

Sales and marketing	1,126,160			1,117,100			3,251,599			3,384,104
General and administrative	1,518,734			1,964,994			4,848,768			6,013,817
	2,644,894			3,082,094			8,100,367			9,397,921

Income (loss) from operations	650,865			(306,139		)	1,057,417			1,233,701

Other income (expense):
Other income (expense)	54,633			(19,985		)	94,516			11,869
Interest expense	(156,593		)	(183,139		)	(490,771		)	(569,958		)
	(101,960		)	(203,124		)	(396,255		)	(558,089		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	548,905			(509,263		)	661,162			675,612
Income tax provision (benefit)	160,700			(180,796		)	178,193			149,679

Net income (loss) from continuing operations	388,205			(328,467		)	482,969			525,933

Discontinued operation (Note 6):
Loss from operations of discontinued business, net of income tax benefit	(12,353		)	(291,050		)	(179,643		)	(484,001		)
Loss on disposal of discontinued business , net of income tax benefit	(496,077		)	—			(496,077		)	—

Net income (loss)	$	(120,225	)	$	(619,517	)	$	(192,751	)	$	41,932

Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01
Diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01

Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic	5,578,869			5,471,175			5,521,096			5,364,472
Diluted	5,578,869			5,471,175			5,521,096			5,651,747

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ON-SITE SOURCING, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
	Three Months Ended September 30						Nine Months Ended September 30
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash provided by operations	$	752,392		$	683,932		$	1,839,669		$	914,460

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment	(142,941		)	(925,872		)	(308,369		)	(2,636,613		)
Receipt of payments on notes receivable	11,923			34,969			35,694			91,725
Proceeds from disposal of equipment	175,975			—			186,074			15,777

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	44,957			(890,903		)	(86,601		)	(2,529,111		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of common stock	47,500			15,963			190,915			675,175
Payments of long-term debt	(653,270		)	(499,413		)	(1,211,947		)	(1,071,273		)
Long term debt borrowing	—			1,250,000			—			1,250,000
Borrowings under line of credit	4,791,408			5,554,831			13,868,611			15,401,613
Payments on line of credit	(4,982,987		)	(6,113,910		)	(14,600,197		)	(14,639,615		)

Net cash used in financing activities	(797,349		)	207,471			(1,752,618		)	1,615,900

Net change in cash	—			500			450			1,249
Cash, beginning of period	4,729			4,031			4,279			3,282
Cash, end of period	$	4,729		$	4,531		$	4,729		$	4,531

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ON-SITE SOURCING, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Nature of Business

On-Site Sourcing, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Virginia in December 1992 and changed its state of incorporation to Delaware in January 1996. The Company provides digital imaging, reprographics, and digital printing to law firms and other organizations throughout the United States. Services are primarily performed in the metropolitan areas of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Washington, D.C., Atlanta, Georgia, New York, New York, Gaithersburg, Maryland (through September 30, 2003), and Tempe, Arizona (through October 15, 2002). In August 2002, the Company expanded its operations to Chicago, Illinois and Wilmington, Delaware. Effective October 15, 2002, the Company ceased production at its facility in Tempe, Arizona, as result of a strategic decision to focus on larger geographic markets for growth. On October 8, 2003 the Company divested the offset printing operation located in Gaithersburg, MD (see Note 6).

2. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements and related footnotes have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual reporting periods. The interim financial information, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.

The financial information presented should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 may not be indicative of the results for the full year.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is primarily derived from providing reprographics, imaging, and digital printing services. The Company recognizes revenue from services rendered when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or delivery has occurred, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Return and bad debt allowances are estimated based on specific identification and historical information.

For services that are completed but not delivered to the customers, no revenue is recognized and the associated costs are inventoried accordingly. Such costs are included in results of operation during the same period when the related services are delivered and the revenue is recognized.

Concentration of Credit Risks

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable. The Company generally sells its products to law firms and other commercial customers located in the United States. The Company grants credit terms without collateral to its customers and has not experienced any significant credit related losses. Accounts receivable include allowances to record receivables at their estimated net realizable value.

Goodwill

The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142). SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to compare the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying amount of the reporting unit to determine if there is potential impairment on an annual basis, unless measurement is required at interim periods. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill is less than its carrying value. The Company determined there was no impairment of goodwill during the periods reported.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable. The Company does not perform a periodic assessment of assets for impairment in the absence of such information or indicators. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or a significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is not recoverable. For long-lived assets to be held and used, the Company recognizes an impairment loss only if its carrying amount is not recoverable through its undiscounted cash flows and measures the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying amount and estimated fair value.

Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activity

The Company uses an interest rate swap to convert its variable-rate interest payments on its mortgage ($5,253,526 at September 30, 2003) to fixed-rate interest payments. This interest rate swap has been designated and qualifies as a cash-flow hedge.

The Company carries all derivative financial instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value of designated, qualified and effective cash flow hedges are estimated and recorded as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) until the hedged transaction occurs, which at that time, is recognized in earnings (loss). The Company has determined that its interest rate swap was highly effective upon adoption.

As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company recorded a non-current liability of $820,156, which represented the estimated fair value of the interest rate swap, along with an unrealized after-tax loss of $495,293 in Other Comprehensive Loss, which is a component of Stockholders’ Equity.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company uses the intrinsic-value method in accounting for its employee stock options rather than the alternative fair value accounting method. Companies that follow the intrinsic-value method must provide pro forma disclosure of the impact of applying the fair-value method.

The following table summarizes relevant information as to reported results under the Company’s intrinsic-value method of accounting for stock awards, with supplemental information as if the fair value recognition provisions had been applied:

	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30,						(Unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(120,225	)	$	(619,517	)	$	(192,751	)	$	41,932
Less: stock-based compensation	70,209			100,723			233,829			295,383
Adjusted net (loss) income	$	(190,434	)	$	(720,240	)	$	(426,580	)	$	(253,451	)

Basic earnings per share – as reported	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01
Diluted earnings per share – as reported	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01
Basic earnings per share – as adjusted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.05	)
Diluted earnings per share – as adjusted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.05	)

The fair value for each option granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, assuming no expected dividends and the following weighted average assumptions:

	For Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2003		2002		2003		2002
Average risk-free interest rate	4.21	%	5.42	%	4.94	%	5.44	%
Average expected life (in years)	5		5		5		5
Volatility	82	%	74	%	84	%	74	%

4. Comprehensive Income

SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, requires that total comprehensive income (loss) be disclosed with equal prominence as net income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as changes in stockholders’ equity exclusive of transactions with owners, such as capital contributions and dividends. The Company’s total comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive loss, which consists of changes in the estimated fair value of the interest rate swap contract. At September 30, 2003 and 2002, the components of comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30,						(Unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Net (loss) income	$	(120,225	)	$	(619,517	)	$	(192,751	)	$	41,932
Other comprehensive loss:
Interest rate swap contract	77,370			(180,954		)	(56,252		)	(559,064		)

Comprehensive loss	$	(42,855	)	$	(800,471	)	$	(136,499	)	$	(517,132	)

5. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by additionally reflecting the potential dilution that could occur, using the treasury stock method, if options to acquire common stock were exercised and resulted in the issuance of common stock. Diluted loss per share excludes the effect of common stock options because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. A reconciliation of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding assuming dilution is as follows:

	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30						(Unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30
	2003			2002			2003			2002

Net income	$	(120,225	)	$	(619,517	)	$	(192,751	)	$	41,932

Weighted average common shares outstanding	5,578,869			5,471,175			5,521,096			5,364,472
Dilutive effect of outstanding stockoptions	—			—			—			287,275

Weighted average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution	5,578,869			5,471,175			5,521,096			5,651,747

Net income per share:
Basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01
Diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01

For the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, 674,291 and 246,500 options, respectively, were excluded from the above reconciliation, as these options were anti-dilutive for these periods. For the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 and the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as a result of a net loss, 15,924, 201,703, and 27,840 options, respectively, were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation, as the shares were anti-dilutive.

6. Discontinued Operations

During the quarter, the Company approved a plan to divest its offset printing operation located in Gaithersburg, MD. In connection with the planned divestiture, the Company recorded a charge of $496,077, net of taxes, which consists primarily of an anticipated loss on the disposition of property and equipment. During October 2003, the Company completed the disposition of the division. Proceeds from the sale of the division were $1,425,000, of which $925,000 was received in cash and $500,000 in a five-year note receivable. At September 30, 2003, property and equipment held for sale was separately presented in the balance sheet at their estimated fair values, less costs of sale.

Excluding the loss related to the disposal, the operating results of the offset printing division for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 were as follows:

	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30						(Unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30
	2003			2002			2003			2002

Revenue	$	640,938		$	553,283		$	1,829,615		$	1,685,461

Operating loss	(73,776		)	(451,251		)	(271,947		)	(621,746		)

Income tax benefit	61,423			160,201			92,304			137,745

Net loss	(12,353		)	(291,050		)	(179,643		)	(484,001		)

Results of the disposed offset printing division were previously reported under the Digital Printing segment. All prior period results of the division have been reclassified to reflect the disposition.

7. Segment Information

The Company is organized and operates in three significant segments: reprographics, imaging, and digital printing services. Until December 31, 2001, the Company also had a facility management services segment. As most of the service contracts were terminated by the Company, this segment was significantly reduced during the first quarter of 2002. At September 30, 2003, the Company has one facilities management contract remaining. Management does not view facility management services as a separate segment for the periods reported. In the summary of the results of the Company’s operating segments below, the results for the facility management contract are listed under the heading of other.

Reprographics involves the copying and management of large amounts of documents extracted in their original format, from the offices and files of customers. Reprographic services include copying, binding, drilling, labeling, collating, assembling and quality review. The Company’s reprographic centers, currently located in Virginia, New York, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Illinois, Delaware, and Arizona (through October 15, 2002), are open 24 hours a day, seven days a week to handle the prompt turn-around time often requested by customers. A typical job ranges in size from single documents with a small number of pages to multiple sets of documents, which can exceed a million pages. A job is typically picked up by the Company’s in-house dispatch service and brought back to its production center. The jobs are then processed per the customer’s instructions and reviewed by the quality control staff. Documents are returned to the client via the Company’s dispatch service. Reprographic jobs are generally billed on a job-by-job basis, based on the number of copies and the level of difficulty in copying the original documents.

Imaging services involves the conversion or transfer of the traditional paper and electronic documents into electronic media or vice-versa. Services provided in the imaging services division primarily cater to law firms. A typical job involves a law firm that is representing a client in a litigation matter. In order for the law firm to prepare for its case, it often must review a large number of documents, emails, and email attachments. As a result, the law firms often have a need to search and retrieve appropriate documents in a timely and efficient manner. In order to help meet this need, the imaging services division offers case management consulting, electronic scanning of documents, converting email, attachments and other electronic files to images, indexing/coding, optical character recognition, electronic discovery, blowback printing, training, technical support and electronic document search and retrieval services. Imaging services are typically billed on a job-by-job basis, based on the number of images and complexity of the retrieval applications.

Digital printing services include both black and white and color digital production of catalogs, brochures, postcards, stationary, direct mail, newsletters, and exhibit materials. Typical customers include organizations requiring print media. In addition, ancillary services, which include graphic design, mailing, special finishing, storage, fulfillment, and delivery services are provided through the digital printing segment. Printing jobs are typically billed on a job-by-job basis depending on several factors, including quantity, number of colors, quality of paper, and graphic design time. Effective October 1, 2003 as a result of the Company’s divestiture of its offset printing operation, the Company will no longer report digital printing as a segment.

The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates segment performance based on revenue and income before allocation of corporate administrative expenses and taxes. A summary of the results of the Company’s operating segments is as follows:

	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30						(Unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Revenue:
Reprographics	$	4,991,476		$	4,249,314		$	14,509,358		$	13,880,331
Imaging	3,441,638			3,338,372			9,822,588			10,729,559
Digital printing	242,647			228,733			757,105			781,340
Other	277,532			246,661			790,099			828,629
Inter-segment elimination	(26,105		)	(21,365		)	(62,963		)	(145,895		)

Total revenue	$	8,927,188		$	8,041,715		$	25,816,187		$	26,073,964

	(Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30						(Unaudited) Nine Months Ended September 30
	2003			2002			2003			2002
Income (loss) before taxes:
Reprographics	$	661,220		$	264,082		$	1,677,907		$	2,172,610
Imaging	849,174			824,116			2,357,304			3,214,525
Digital printing	(20,835		)	(78,453		)	31,724			6,334
Other	50,969			42,005			88,492			164,878
Corporate administrative expenses	(991,624		)	(1,561,013		)	(3,494,265		)	(4,882,735		)

Total income (loss) before taxes	$	548,905		$	(509,263	)	$	661,162		$	675,612

Results of operations of the offset printing division located in Gaithersburg, Maryland were excluded from the table due to the disposition of this division during the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (See Note 6).

8. Restructuring of Financial Covenants

The Company has a working capital line of credit, a mortgage note and a term note to a bank. The underlying agreements related to these debts provide cross-default protection provisions to the lender, and require compliance with certain financial covenants. Under the original covenant structure, a significant covenant required the Company to maintain an Interest Coverage Ratio, as defined, in excess of 2.0:1. In May 2003, the Company obtained approval from the bank to reduce the required Interest Coverage Ratio to 1.25:1 for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, after which the ratio would revert back to 2.0:1.

In July 2003 as a result of the Company not being in compliance with the Interest Coverage Ratio at June 30, 2003, the Company requested the bank to restructure the Company’s covenants and debt structure. The bank agreed to restructure the terms of the covenants and debt as follows:

Under the modified loan agreements, the principal amount available to borrow under the line of credit agreement was reduced from $7.0 million to $5.0 million and the related interest rate was increased by 0.15% to 30-day LIBOR plus 2.35% (3.47% at September 30, 2003). The working capital line of credit is collateralized by accounts receivable and certain equipment, and expires in May 2004. The Company has the capacity to borrow, at any given time, the lesser of the established line of credit or eligible accounts receivable, generally defined as 75% of accounts receivable that are less than 120 days old. At September 30, 2003, the Company had approximately $3.0 million available to draw against the credit line.

The definition of the Funds Flow Coverage Ratio was modified and the revised Funds Flow Coverage Ratio was initially measured on September 30, 2003, and at each subsequent quarter-end. The Company is required to maintain a minimum Funds Flow Coverage Ratio of 1.5:1.

The Interest Coverage Ratio was deleted in its entirety.

The Tangible Net Worth Covenant was modified to increase the minimum tangible net worth of the Company, at all times, to $8,500,000.

A Net Loss Covenant was added which states that the after tax net loss for any fiscal quarter shall not exceed $200,000, and a maximum after tax net loss for fiscal year 2003 shall not exceed $350,000.

The modified agreement also states that the Company shall not make capital expenditures in excess of $125,000 in any fiscal quarter. However, this amount may be increased by $150,000 if the company receives an equivalent amount of cash as a result of stock options exercised by option holders of the Company.

At September 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance with all bank convents.

9. Subsequent Events

On October 28, 2003 the Company signed a letter of intent with Docuforce, LLC, to be acquired in a cash transaction valued at approximately $16,000,000. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, stockholders of On-Site Sourcing are expected to receive $2.75 per share, subject to dollar-for-dollar adjustment based on changes in total stockholders’ equity from September 30, 2003 to the closing of the transaction. In addition, the transaction is subject to due diligence and financial review by Docuforce LLC, approval by On-Site Sourcing’s stockholders and Docuforce’s principals, negotiation and execution of a definitive merger agreement and certain other customary conditions including certain key executives entering into employment agreements with the acquirer. The transaction is expected to close in late February or early March 2004.

On November 4, 2003 the Company entered into an agreement for the sale and subsequent leaseback of the Company’s land and headquarters office and production facility located in Alexandria, VA. The transaction is contingent on a customary 30-day feasibility study to be conducted by the buyer and is expected to close in late December 2003. The sale price is estimated to be $9,900,000, comprised of assignment to the buyer of the mortgage of approximately $5,200,000 and the interest rate swap contract liability of approximately $850,000, and cash proceeds of approximately $3,850,000.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

On-Site Sourcing, Inc. (On-Site, the Company, we, us, or our) provides document and information management services through its facilities in the greater Atlanta, Baltimore, New York City, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., Chicago, and Wilmington metropolitan areas, and served clients on the West Coast through its Tempe, Arizona facility (through October 15, 2002). We help clients in information-intensive industries manage large volumes of documents and information, allowing them to concentrate on their core business operations. Our target clients typically generate large volumes of documents and information that require specialized processing, distribution, storage, and retrieval. Our typical clients include law firms, insurance companies, healthcare organizations, non-profit organizations, accounting, consulting and finance firms and other organizations throughout the United States. We also provide commercial printing services utilizing digital printing technology in our facilities in the Washington, D.C. area. Effective October 15, 2002, the Company ceased production at its facility in Tempe, Arizona as result of a strategic decision to focus on larger geographic markets for growth. The production facility represented a component of the Imaging Services Segment. On October 8, 2003 the Company divested the offset printing operation located in Gaithersburg, MD (see Note 6).

On-Site was originally incorporated in Virginia in December 1992, and changed its state of incorporation to Delaware in March 1996.

Forward Looking Disclosure

Certain information included herein contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding industry prospects, plans for future expansion and other business development activities as well as future results of operations or financial position and the effects of competition are forward looking. Such forward-looking information is subject to changes and variations which are not reasonably predictable and which could significantly affect future results. Accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. The risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect future results include, but are not limited to, those relating to the adequacy of operating and management controls, operating in a competitive environment and a changing environment, including new technology and processes, existing and future vendor relationships, the Company’s ability to access capital and meet its debt service requirements, dependence on existing management, general economic conditions, terrorist attacks, and changes in federal or state laws or regulations. These risks and uncertainties, along with the following discussion, describe some, but not all, of the factors that could cause actual results to differ significantly from management’s expectations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has defined a company’s most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and which require the Company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, we have identified the critical accounting policies and judgments addressed below. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is primarily derived from providing imaging, reprographics and digital printing services. The Company recognizes revenue from services rendered when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or delivery has occurred, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Return and bad debt allowances are estimated based on specific identification and historical information.

Included in “Accounts receivable, net” on our Balance Sheets is an allowance for doubtful accounts. Senior management reviews the accounts receivable aging on a monthly basis to determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectable. After all attempts to collect the receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the information available to us, we believe our allowance for doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2003 is adequate. However, no assurances can be given that actual write-offs will not exceed the recorded allowance.

Accounting for Goodwill

The Company records impairment losses on goodwill when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired and the estimated fair value of the asset is less than its recorded amount. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include material adverse changes in operations, significant adverse differences in actual results in comparison with initial valuation forecasts prepared at the time of acquisition, a decision to abandon acquired products, services or technologies, or other significant adverse changes that would indicate the carrying amount of the recorded asset might not be recoverable. The fair value for goodwill is estimated using the discounted cash flow model, with the Company’s own assumptions. At September 30, 2003 the Company noted no conditions or change in circumstances that would render an impairment assessment. Change in management’s judgment may lead to significantly different results.

Accounting for Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activity

The Company uses an interest rate swap to convert its variable-rate interest payments on its mortgage ($5,253,526 at September 30, 2003) to fixed-rate interest payments. This interest rate swap was designated as a cash-flow hedge and qualified for the short-cut method of assessing effectiveness.

The Company carries all derivative financial instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Fair value is obtained from the lending institution on a quarterly basis, and is based on interest rates at the inception of the hedge, current interest rates, and remaining time period until maturity on the underlying debt. Changes in fair value of effective cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) until the hedged transaction occurs, which at that time is recognized in earnings (loss). The Company assumes the hedged transaction will occur during the term of the underlying agreement. Results of operations may be materially affected if such transaction were not to occur.

Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets (primarily property and equipment) are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable. The Company views the following as conditions that necessitate impairment: a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or a significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is not recoverable. For long-lived assets to be held and used, the Company measures fair value based on quoted market prices, discounted estimates of future cash flows or other methods. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company did not note any events or changes in circumstances indicating the carrying amount of long-lived assets were not recoverable. The carrying amount of long-lived assets is based on management’s judgment as to estimated future performance of the business. Changes in judgments regarding future performance may lead to a different result.

Accounting for Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be reversed. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for amounts it considers unrealizable. As of September 30, 2003, the Company did not provide any valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets. This assessment is based on management’s best estimate of forecasted taxable income. There can be no guarantee that the actual results will not be materially different from forecasted results.

Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to certain claims and legal proceedings. We record an accrued liability for these matters when an adverse outcome is probable and the amount of the potential liability is reasonably estimable. We do not believe the resolution of these matters will have a material effect upon our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows for an interim or annual period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. The statement requires that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly and clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component that warrants special reporting

in the statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except in certain circumstances, and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” This Statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures in its statement of financial position certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances) because that financial instrument embodies an obligation of the issuer. This Statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its

financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Results of Operations For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002.

Revenue

Revenue reported for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was $8.9 million, a $0.9 million, or 11.0% increase from the $8.0 million reported in the comparable period in 2002. Revenue reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $25.8 million, a $0.3 million, or 1.0% decrease from the $26.1 million reported in the comparable period in 2002. The increase in revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2002 was due to an increased demand for our service and partially due to revenue generated by the Company’s newly opened offices in Chicago, IL and Wilmington, DE. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was due to a overall reduced general demand for our services related to large transactional matters and reduced pricing on services as a result of competitive pricing pressures.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was $3.3 million, a $0.5 million, or 18.7%, increase from the $2.8 million reported in the comparable period in 2002. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $9.1 million, a $1.5 million, or 13.9%, decrease from the $10.6 million reported in the comparable period in 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 36.9% and

34.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of sales was 35.5% and 40.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2002 was attributable to increased revenue, increased higher margin service offerings, and the positive impact of cost cutting measures implemented by the Company. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the reduction in gross profit was mostly attributable to overall decreased revenues, increased price competition, and increased selling of labor-intensive services and less higher profit margin service offerings, such as electronic file processing.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales and marketing expense for the three months ended September 30, 2003 remained unchanged at $1.1 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2002. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of sales was 12.6% and 13.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Sales and marketing expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $3.3 million, a $0.1 million, or 3.9%, decrease from the $3.4 million reported in the comparable period in 2002. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of sales was 12.6% and 13.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of salaries, sales commissions, and other related costs associated with the selling of the Company’s services, such as travel and entertainment. Sales commissions paid to the Company’s account executives are calculated on a per-job basis and fluctuate depending on the profitability of the particular job. Sales and marketing expense decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the comparable period in 2002 due to the transition of several account executives from base salary to commission only, and cost cutting measures with regard to marketing and related expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was $1.5 million, a $0.5 million or 22.7%, decrease from the $2.0 million reported in the comparable period in 2002. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales were 17.0% and 24.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $4.8 million, a $1.2 million or 19.4%, decrease from the $6.0 million reported in the comparable period in 2002. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales were 18.8% and 23.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Significant factors that contributed to the decreased expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 include the following:

A decrease of approximately $128,000 and $94,600 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, is attributable to the reduction of administrative salaries. This reduction is attributable to the elimination of several highly compensated administrative positions along with the closing of the Arizona office.

A decrease of approximately $4,300 and $309,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, is attributable to the reduction in bonus payments awarded to the divisional managers. This reduction is due to a majority of the divisional managers not meeting their performance goals set in their bonus plans for fiscal year 2003. Unlike prior years, the bonus plans for 2003 are based on the performance of each segment. Prior year bonus plans were based on the performance of each location.

A decrease of approximately $36,300 and $144,900 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, is attributable to the decreased travel incurred by executive and management level employees visiting the Company’s various production locations.

A decrease of approximately $38,200 and $99,100 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, is attributable to the Company’s decrease in depreciation expense. Over the past nine months, the Company has made a significant effort to reduce the amount of capital expenditures. As a result, the company has experienced an insignificant increase in depreciation expense arising from new capital expenditures. Furthermore, the Company’s depreciable base has been consistently decreasing as its existing assets have become fully depreciated and/or disposed of. This, coupled with the Company’s decreasing capital expenditures, has resulted in a reduction in depreciation expense.

A decrease of approximately $73,600 and $155,300 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, is attributable to the Company’s decrease in office expense. The Company’s office expenses include company-sponsored events, promotional items, building maintenance and payroll processing fees. The closing of the Arizona office and the increased cost reduction efforts have contributed to the Company’s decrease in office and general and administrative expenses.

Other Income

Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $55,000, a $75,000 increase from the amount reported in the comparable period in 2002. Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $95,000, an $83,000 increase from the approximately $12,000 reported in the comparable period in 2002. Other income consists primarily of rental income and the gain or loss from fixed asset dispositions. The Company’s rental income is generated from subletting a portion of the property owned at 832 North Henry Street, Alexandria, VA. The Company currently has one tenant who will begin a month-to-month lease beginning in November 2003. The increased income for the three and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2003 was attributable to a gain on the sale of assets, whereas a loss was recognized from the sale of assets in the comparable periods in 2002.

Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $157,000, a $26,000 decrease from the approximate $183,000 reported in the comparable period in 2002. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was approximately $491,000, a $79,000 decrease from the approximately $570,000 reported in the comparable period in 2002. The reduction in interest expense is due to lower debt balances and overall lower interest rates related to borrowings under term notes and other similar debt arrangements. In addition, the Company has reduced its line of credit and term notes outstanding balances as compared to 2002. The Company’s line of credit balance was $2,129,828 and $3,882,165 as of September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company had income tax expense of $160,700 and an income tax benefit of $180,796 for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This increase is attributable to the Company’s increased income before tax for the respective periods. The Company had income tax expense of $178,193 and $149,679 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has funded its expansion through utilizing internally generated cash flow, long term financing, and a short-term commercial line of credit. The Company anticipates that the cash flow from operations and the credit facilities will be sufficient to meet the expected cash requirements for the next twelve months. However, the Company may experience an inability to meet its capital requirements should any of the following events occur: significant loss from operations, significant decrease in revenue, credit covenant defaults, and/or account receivable defaults by customers, or groups of customers, whose balances are significant to the Company’s operations. In order to meet these unforeseen capital requirements, the Company may seek additional resources, which could include collateral-based loans, capital leases, and operating leases.

As of September 30, 2003, the Company had approximately $4,700 in cash (primarily petty cash). To ensure that working capital is available to fund the Company’s operations, the Company has a $5.0 million working capital line of credit (Line of Credit) that expires May 2004. The Company has the capacity to borrow, at any given time, the lesser of 1) the established line of credit or 2) the eligible accounts receivable - generally defined as 75% of accounts receivable less than 120 days old. As of September 30, 2003 the Company had approximately $3.0 million available under the Line of Credit, bearing interest at the lesser of the bank’s prime interest rate or the 30-day LIBOR plus 2.35%.

As of September 30, 2003, the Company had an outstanding mortgage note payable (Mortgage) of $5,253,526. The Mortgage was entered to fund the purchase of property located at 832 North Henry Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In order to manage interest costs and hedge exposure to changing interest rates, the Company also entered into an interest rate swap, whereby the interest rate is fixed at 9.48%. Under the terms of the Mortgage and the related interest rate swap agreement, the Company is required to make monthly principal and interest payments of $60,495 for a period of seven years, and a lump-sum payment of $4,155,254 at the Mortgage termination in October 2007.

As of September 30, 2003, the Company also had one term note (Note) with a remaining principal amount of $1,533,333. The note bears interest at a fluctuating annual rate equal to the 1 – Month LIBOR plus 2.35% and matures on July 31, 2005.

The Credit, Mortgage, and Note were all obtained from the same bank. As of September 30, 2003 the total bank borrowings were $8,916,687. The underlying agreements related to these borrowings require certain financial covenants and include cross-default provisions to protect the lender.

Under the modified loan agreements, the principal amount available to borrow under the line of credit agreement was reduced from $7.0 million to $5.0 million and the interest rate increased to the 30-day LIBOR plus 2.35% (3.47% at September 30, 2003), an increase of 0.15%. The working capital line of credit is collateralized by accounts receivable and certain equipment, and expires in May 2004. The Company has the capacity to borrow, at any given time, the lesser of the established line of credit or eligible accounts receivable, generally defined as 75% of accounts receivable that are less than 120 days old. At September 30, 2003, the Company had approximately $3.0 million available to draw against the credit line.

The Interest Coverage Ratio was deleted in its entirety.

The Tangible Net Worth Covenant was modified to increase the minimum tangible net worth of the Company, at all times, to $8,500,000.

At September 30, 2003 the Company was in compliance with all bank covenants.

The following summarizes the Company’s payment (principal and interest) obligations and commitments under contract, including debt and lease arrangements, as of September 30, 2003. The Company expects to fund such obligations from cash generated from the operating activities and the line of credit.

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
Line of Credit	$	2,129,828	2,129,828		—		—		—
Building Mortgage	7,119,510		725,940		2,177,820		4,215,750		—
Long-Term Debt	1,522,468		843,576		678,892		—		—
Lease Commitments	5,844,131		1,925,206		3,418,537		339,526		160,862
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	16,615,937	$	5,624,550	$	6,275,249	$	4,555,276	$	160,862

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company’s activities expose it to market risks that are related to the effects of changes in interest rates. The Company does not have cash flow exposure due to interest rate changes for its mortgage note ($5,253,526 at September 30, 2003) as the Company uses an interest rate swap to fix the variable interest rate on the note (30 day LIBOR plus 2.5%) at 9.48%. Other debt arrangements, such as working capital line of credit and short-term notes are used to support general operation needs, including capital expenditures and working capital needs. The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and notes payable reported in the balance sheets approximate fair value.

The table below presents principal amounts and related average interest rates by year of maturity for our long-term obligations at September 30, 2003:

	2003			2004			2005			2006			2007
Mortgage note	$	56,010		$	235,119		$	260,184		$	286,307		$	4,415,906
Average interest rate	9.48		%	9.48		%	9.48		%	9.48		%	9.48		%

Term note	200,001			800,004			466,669
Average interest rate	3.65		%	3.95		%	4.95		%

Interest rate swap (pay fixed/receive variable)	$	56,010		$	235,119		$	260,184		$	286,307		$	4,415,906
Average pay rate	9.48		%	9.48		%	9.48		%	9.48		%	9.48		%
Average receive rate	3.15		%	3.45		%	4.45		%	5.74		%	6.27		%

The carrying amounts and fair value of our financial instruments are as follows:

	September 30, 2003						September 30, 2002
	Carrying Amount			Fair Value			Carrying Amount			Fair Value
Line of credit	$	2,129,828		$	2,129,828		$	3,882,165		$	3,882,165
Term note	1,533,333			1,533,333			3,059,081			3,059,081
Mortgage note	5,253,526			5,253,526			5,464,836			5,464,836
Interest rate swap	(820,156		)	(820,156		)	(925,757		)	(925,757		)

Based upon the composition of the Company’s variable-rate debt outstanding at September 30, 2003, which is primarily borrowings under the working capital line of credit and term notes, we do not believe that a hypothetical increase in the bank’s prime rate of interest or the 30-day LIBOR would be material to net income.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure the timeliness and accuracy of our disclosures and financial statements. This evaluation was under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Company and management also recognized that all disclosure controls and procedures have certain limitations based on cost-benefit considerations, and can only provide reasonable assurances of achieving the desired control objectives. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurances that they are timely alerted to material information required to be included in our period Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5. Other Information

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports

(A) EXHIBITS

Exhibit 10.30 Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of the Gaithersburg Business, dated October 8, 2003 with Colornet Printing and Graphics, Inc.

Exhibit 31.1 Certification as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2 Certification as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1 Certication Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer

(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

On October 8, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission to report the sale of the Company’s Offset Printing Division. The Current Report on Form 8-K attaches as an exhibit the press release regarding the sale.

On November 4, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission to report the signing of a letter of intent with Docuforce, LLC to be acquired in a cash transaction valued at approximately $16,000,000.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		ON-SITE SOURCING, INC.
		(Registrant)



		/s/ Jason Parikh
Date November 14, 2003		Jason Parikh Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

ON SITE SOURCING INC 10-Q