UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010

o Transition report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-51112

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)

GEORGIA		20-2118147
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification No.)

1701 Bass Road

Macon, Georgia 31210

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(478) 476-2170

(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” (in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, no par value, 4,280,745 shares outstanding at ~~July~~November 2312, 2010

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

INDEX

		PAGE
PART I:	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following consolidated financial statements are provided for Atlantic Southern Financial Group, Inc.
	Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (audited).	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (audited).	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) — For the Three Months And Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) — For the Three Months And Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.	3
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) — For the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) — For the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) — For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) — For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	42
ITEM 4T.	Controls and Procedures	43
PART II:	OTHER INFORMATION	44

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

~~June~~September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (Audited)

	As of
	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	87,~~519~~522,~~395~~162		$	4,990,374
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks	7597,~~142~~289,~~356~~101			28,401,303
Total cash and cash equivalents	83104,~~661~~811,~~751~~263			33,391,677
Securities available for sale, at fair value	7240,~~334~~722,~~563~~089			126,939,601
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, restricted, at cost	4,~~316~~007,~~800~~400			4,316,800
Loans held for sale	1285,~~453,490~~026			1,089,108
Loans, net of unearned income	~~663~~607,~~781~~722,~~730~~880			718,306,915
Less - allowance for loan losses	(1918,~~323~~652,~~225~~884		)	(21,478,748		)
Loans, net	~~644~~589,~~458~~069,~~505~~996			696,828,167
Bank premises and equipment, net	30,~~360~~043,~~216~~245			31,016,982
Accrued interest receivable	43,~~066~~525,~~884~~117			4,549,769
Cash surrender value of life insurance	13,~~275~~409,~~536~~122			13,011,018
Intangible assets, net of amortization	2,~~367~~277,~~692~~113			2,548,850
Other real estate owned	4161,~~720~~612,~~587~~054			21,066,480
Income tax receivable	11204,~~063,312~~983			11,174,666
Other assets	2,~~507~~613,~~325~~627			2,446,748
Total Assets	$	~~911~~852,~~586~~581,~~661~~035		$	948,379,866
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	5354,~~182~~045,~~187~~637		$	53,747,355
Money market and NOW accounts	~~113~~107,~~621~~131,~~646~~121			132,469,652
Savings	912,~~143~~820,~~293~~004			8,890,713
Time deposits	~~659~~612,~~160~~306,~~509~~024			666,049,168
Total deposits	~~835~~786,~~107~~302,~~635~~786			861,156,888
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	3429,000,000			39,000,000
Subordinated debentures	1,400,000			1,400,000
Junior subordinated debentures	10,310,000			10,310,000
Accrued interest payable	43,~~041~~467,~~544~~329			4,977,554
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	21,~~560~~941,~~337~~277			1,896,265
Total liabilities	~~887~~832,~~419~~421,~~516~~392			918,740,707
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, authorized 2,000,000 shares, no shares outstanding	—			—
Preferred stock, authorized 2,000,000 shares, outstanding -0- shares	—			—
Common stock, no par value, authorized 110,000,000 shares, 4,280,745 issued and outstanding in 2010, no par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares, 4,211,780 issued and outstanding in 2009	74,~~742~~748,~~733~~685			74,630,831
Deferred compensation, 68,965 shares in 2010	(93,750		)	—
Deferred compensation, 68,965 shares	(87,500		)	—
Accumulated deficit	(5154,~~263~~921,~~120~~667		)	(45,592,212		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	~~781~~420,~~282~~125			600,540
Total shareholders’ equity	2420,~~167~~159,~~145~~643			29,639,159
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	~~911~~852,~~586~~581,~~661~~035		$	948,379,866

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Three Months and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

2010

2009

2010

2009

Interest and Dividend Income:

Interest and fees on loans

8,~~333~~111,~~148~~829

10,~~729~~424,~~675~~193

1725,~~485~~596,~~138~~967

2232,~~131~~555,~~412~~605

Interest on securities:

Taxable income

~~417~~288,~~007~~544

~~811~~614,~~478~~751

~~882~~1,~~127~~170,671

12,~~785~~400,~~725~~476

Non-taxable income

~~144~~140,~~596~~299

~~156~~146,~~520~~952

~~289~~430,~~956~~255

~~323~~470,~~252~~204

Other interest and dividend income

5452,~~658~~125

468,~~323~~928

72124,~~698~~823

877,~~481~~409

Total interest and dividend income

8,~~949~~592,~~409~~797

11,~~701~~254,~~996~~824

1827,~~729~~322,~~919~~716

2435,~~248~~503,~~870~~694

Interest Expense:

Deposits

4,~~838~~291,~~988~~024

6,~~692~~704,~~934~~732

914,~~875~~166,~~521~~545

1320,~~347~~052,~~697~~429

Subordinated debentures

42,~~466~~934

42,~~467~~933

84127,~~466~~400

84127,~~467~~400

Junior subordinated debentures

6167,~~328~~041

8469,~~860~~176

~~120~~187,~~720~~761

~~186~~255,~~247~~423

FHLB borrowings and other interest expense

~~224~~252,~~301~~942

~~387~~406,~~480~~166

~~456~~709,~~804~~746

~~738~~1,~~962~~145,128

Total interest expense

54,~~167~~653,~~083~~941

7,~~207~~223,~~741~~007

1015,~~537~~191,~~511~~452

1421,~~357~~580,~~373~~380

Net interest income

3,~~782~~938,~~326~~856

4,~~494~~031,~~255~~817

812,~~192~~131,~~408~~264

913,~~891~~923,~~497~~314

Provision for loan losses

2,~~034~~178,000

511,~~718~~352,000

35,~~336~~514,000

617,~~068~~420,000

Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses

1,~~748~~760,~~326~~856

(17,~~223~~320,~~745~~183

)

46,~~856~~617,~~408~~264

(3,~~823~~496,~~497~~686

)

Noninterest Income:

Service charges on deposit accounts

~~407~~386,~~915~~702

~~418~~464,~~094~~250

~~792~~1,~~227~~178,929

~~839~~1,~~675~~303,925

Other service charges, commissions and fees

~~159~~151,~~358~~385

~~125~~135,~~536~~817

~~291~~442,~~512~~897

~~238~~373,~~127~~944

Gain on sales / calls of investment securities

42,906

1,095,390

42,906

1,315,818

Gain on sales, calls and impairment write-down of investment securities

556,613

15,342

599,519

1,331,160

Mortgage origination income

5768,~~977~~330

~~186~~249,~~631~~162

~~150~~218,~~013~~343

~~393~~642,~~587~~749

Other income

~~228~~238,~~580~~177

~~254~~267,~~933~~493

~~489~~727,~~193~~370

~~556~~823,~~076~~569

Total noninterest income

~~896~~1,~~736~~401,207

21,~~080~~132,~~584~~064

13,~~765~~167,~~851~~058

34,~~343~~475,~~283~~347

Noninterest Expense:

Salaries and employee benefits

2,~~223~~045,~~163~~953

2,~~638~~423,~~685~~366

46,~~550~~596,~~465~~418

57,~~415~~838,~~452~~818

Occupancy expense

~~444~~442,~~531~~535

~~436~~463,~~857~~275

~~883~~1,~~343~~325,878

~~891~~1,~~754~~355,029

Equipment rental and depreciation of equipment

~~298~~300,~~411~~476

~~326~~333,~~202~~301

~~594~~895,~~774~~250

~~631~~964,~~503~~804

Loss on sale of other assets

500

5,550

775

43,797

(Gain) loss on sale of other assets

5,338

(105,760

)

6,113

(61,963

)

Loss on sale and impairment of other real estate

~~295~~1,~~414~~322,408

1941,~~466,000~~572

~~396~~1,~~927~~719,335

12,~~490~~432,~~688~~260

Other real estate expense

~~827~~477,~~714~~216

~~210~~316,~~603~~962

1,~~301~~778,~~170~~386

~~336~~653,~~296~~258

FDIC and state banking assessments

1,~~417~~103,~~262~~010

~~958~~729,~~385~~328

23,~~328~~431,~~219~~229

1,~~154~~883,~~611~~939

Goodwill impairment

—

~~19,533,501~~—

—

19,533,501

Other expenses

1,~~175~~123,~~934~~674

1,~~658~~392,~~438~~846

23,~~237~~361,~~494~~168

34,~~051~~444,~~620~~466

Total noninterest expense

6,~~682~~820,~~929~~610

276,~~234~~494,~~221~~890

1219,~~293~~113,~~167~~777

3239,~~549~~044,~~222~~112

Loss before income taxes

(43,~~037~~658,~~867~~547

)

(2612,~~377~~683,~~382~~009

)

(59,~~670~~329,~~908~~455

)

(2538,~~382~~065,~~442~~451

)

Income tax benefit

—

24,~~595~~395,~~673~~044

—

26,~~342~~737,~~486~~530

Net Loss

(43,~~037~~658,~~867~~547

)

(238,~~781~~287,~~709~~965

)

(59,~~670~~329,~~908~~455

)

(2331,~~039~~327,~~956~~921

)

Net Loss per Share:

Net Loss per share:

Basic

(0.9687

)

(51.6597

)

(12.3522

)

(57.4744

)

Diluted

(0.9687

)

(51.6597

)

(12.3522

)

(57.4744

)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

For the Three Months and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net loss	$	(43,~~037~~658,~~867~~547	)	$	(238,~~781~~287,~~709~~965	)	$	(59,~~670~~329,~~908~~455	)	$	(2331,~~039~~327,~~956~~921	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investment securities available for sale	206,622			(1,187,425		)	316,758			(206,520		)
Unrealized holding gains on investment securities available for sale	9,406			1,349,409			326,164			1,200,506
Reclassification adjustment for gains on investments available for sale realized in net loss	(42556,~~906~~613		)	(115,~~095,390~~342		)	(42599,~~906~~519		)	(1,~~315~~388,~~818~~778		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), before tax	~~163~~(547,~~716~~207		)	(21,~~282~~334,~~815~~067		)	(273,~~852~~355		)	(1188,~~522,338~~272		)
Income taxes related to other comprehensive income (loss):
Income taxes related to other comprehensive (income) loss:
Unrealized holding (gains) losses on investment securities available for sale	(70,251		)	403,725			(107,698		)	70,217
Unrealized holding gains on investment securities available for sale	(3,198		)	(458,799		)	(110,896		)	(408,172		)
Reclassification adjustment for gains on investments available for sale realized in net loss	14189,~~588~~248			~~372~~5,~~433~~216			14203,~~588~~836			~~447~~472,~~378~~185
Total income taxes related to other comprehensive income (loss)	(55,663		)	776,158			(93,110		)	517,595
Total income taxes related to other comprehensive (income) loss	186,050			(453,583		)	92,940			64,013
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	~~108~~(361,~~053~~157		)	(1880,~~506,657~~484		)	(180,~~742~~415		)	(1124,~~004,743~~259		)
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	(34,~~929~~019,~~814~~704	)	$	(257,~~288~~407,~~366~~481	)	$	(59,~~490~~509,~~166~~870	)	$	(2431,~~044~~452,~~699~~180	)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(59,~~670~~329,~~908~~455	)	$	(2331,~~039~~327,~~956~~921	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	35,~~336~~514,000			617,~~068~~420,000
Depreciation	~~784~~1,~~883~~176,891			~~808~~1,~~320~~219,143
Stock based compensation	1830,~~152~~353			1319,~~075~~026
Goodwill impairment charge	—			19,533,501
Amortization and (accretion), net	~~473~~621,~~288~~282			~~350~~536,~~527~~481
Loss on sale and impairment of other real estate	~~396~~1,~~927~~719,335			12,~~490~~432,~~688~~260
Loss on sale of other assets	775			43,797
(Gain) loss on sale of other assets	6,113			(61,963		)
Gain on sales / calls of investment securities	(42,906		)	(1,315,818		)
Gain on sales, calls and impairment write-down of investment securities	(599,519		)	(1,331,160		)
Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance	(~~264~~398,~~518~~104		)	(~~265~~401,~~058~~540		)
Change in:
Loans held for sale	~~(229~~939,~~382~~082		)	(2280,~~780,782~~588		)
Accrued income and other assets	112,~~151~~617,~~030~~274			1(5,~~141~~012,~~850~~219		)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(~~271~~1,~~938~~465,213		)	(176,~~342,243~~297		)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(318,597		)	705,901
Net cash provided by operating activities	10,832,039			2,668,723
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net change in loans to customers	2456,~~267~~155,~~006~~354			(45,~~780~~215,~~049~~629		)
Purchase of available for sale securities	(27,~~439~~467,~~000~~125		)	(~~136~~201,~~272~~094,~~035~~582		)
Proceeds from sales, calls, maturities and paydowns of available for sale securities	5793,~~115~~716,~~518~~246			88122,~~770~~479,~~336~~947
Purchase of other investments	—			(880,600		)
Proceeds from sales of other investments	—			447,526
Proceeds from sale of other investments	309,400			484,000
Property and equipment expenditures	(~~128~~203,~~117~~154		)	(1,~~430~~492,~~840~~611		)
Improvement of other real estate	(~~419~~838,~~317~~736		)	(1525,~~668~~048		)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate and other assets	3,~~241~~769,~~834~~664			54,~~837~~693,~~334~~445
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	81145,~~637~~441,~~924~~649			(4870,~~323~~619,~~996~~820		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net change in deposits	(2674,~~049~~854,~~253~~102		)	~~128~~120,~~367~~708,~~125~~633
Advances on FHLB borrowings	—			31,000,000
Payments on FHLB borrowings	(510,000,000		)	(2228,200,000		)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(3184,~~049~~854,~~253~~102		)	~~137~~123,~~167~~508,~~125~~633
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents	5071,~~270~~419,~~074~~586			8955,~~549~~557,~~030~~536
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year	33,391,677			15,130,136
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Quarter	$	83104,~~661~~811,~~751~~263		$	~~104~~70,~~679~~687,~~166~~672

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009

(Unaudited)

Supplemental ~~Disclosures~~Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

Noncash transactions:

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009
Changes in unrealized gain/loss on investments, net of tax effect	$	(180,~~742~~415	)	$	(1124,~~004,743~~259	)
Transfer of loans to other real estate and other assets	$	2547,~~071~~520,~~376~~667		$	416,~~705~~758,~~068~~579
Transfer of other real estate to loans and loans held for sale	$	~~435~~1,~~153~~567,026		$	—4,078,873
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	1116,~~473~~701,~~521~~677		$	1421,~~727~~918,~~948~~066
Income tax refunds	$	(~~111~~10,~~454~~969,783	)	$	(848,760	)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

(2) Regulatory Orders

On September 11, 2009, Atlantic Southern Bank (the “Bank”), the wholly-owned subsidiary bank of Atlantic Southern Financial Group, Inc., entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist (the “Consent Agreement”) with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (the “GDBF”), whereby the Bank consented to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist (the “Order”). Under the terms of the Order, the Bank cannot declare dividends without the prior written approval of the FDIC and the GDBF. Other material provisions of the order require the Bank to: (i) strengthen its board of directors’ oversight of management and operations of the Bank, (ii) establish a committee consisting of at least four members, three of which must be independent, to oversee the Bank’s compliance with the Order, (iii) maintain specified capital and liquidity ratios, (iv) improve the Bank’s lending and collection policies and procedures, particularly with respect to the origination and monitoring of commercial real estate and acquisition, development and construction loans, (v) eliminate from its books, by charge off or collection, all assets classified as “loss” and 50% of all assets classified as doubtful, (vi) perform risk segmentation analysis with respect to concentrations of credit, (vii) receive a brokered deposit waiver from the FDIC prior to accepting, rolling over or renewing any brokered deposits and submit a written plan for eliminating its reliance on brokered deposits, (viii) adopt and implement a policy limiting the use of loan interest reserves, (ix) formulate and fully implement a written plan and comprehensive budget for all categories of income and expense, and (x) prepare and submit progress reports to the FDIC and the GDBF. The FDIC order will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the FDIC and the GDBF.

The Bank has continued to serve its customers in all areas including making loans, establishing lines of credit, accepting deposits and processing banking transactions. The Bank’s deposits remain insured by the FDIC to the maximum limits allowed by law. The FDIC and GDBF did not impose or recommend any monetary penalties.

As of the date of this report, the Bank has made the following progress in complying with the above stated provisions of the Order:

(i) Since the Order and throughout 2010, the board of directors’ participation in the affairs of the Bank has continued to increase through greater communication with management, an analysis of management reports to the board, as well as increased committee activities.

(ii) The Bank has formed an oversight committee for the purpose of monitoring the Bank’s overall compliance with the Order and this committee meets monthly and reports to the full board of the Bank at each regularly scheduled board meeting. Although not specifically required by the Order, the board engaged an independent management consulting firm to conduct an assessment of Bank management.

(iii) The Bank developed a capital plan, which includes reducing expenses to improve earnings, restructuring the balance sheet to reduce non-performing assets, seeking new capital and limiting loan growth and will continue to revise the plan quarterly. The Bank has also reviewed its written liquidity, contingency funding, and funds management policies. Both the revised capital plan and the revised liquidity policy have been submitted to the supervisory authorities for review. The

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Bank’s Total Risk Based Capital ratio was 5.8349% and the Tier 1 Leverage Ratio was 3.2714% at ~~June~~ September 30, 2010. ~~The~~ The Bank’s liquidity ratio at ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 was 1817.6194%.

(iv) The Bank has reviewed and revised lending policies to provide additional guidance and control over the lending functions.

(v) The Bank has eliminated from its books all assets or portions of assets classified as “Loss” and 50% of all assets or portions of assets classified as “Doubtful”.

(vi) The Bank has and will continue to perform a risk segmentation analysis with respect to concentrations of credit. Management is limiting credit availability especially for commercial real estate and acquisition, development and construction loans and pursuing collection efforts aggressively in an effort to reduce the Bank’s exposure to commercial real estate and acquisition, development and construction, pursuant to the Order.

(vii) The Bank has submitted to the supervisory authorities a written plan for eliminating its reliance on brokered deposits and will not accept, roll over or renew any brokered deposits unless a waiver has been received from the FDIC. The Bank continues to significantly ~~reduced~~reduce its exposure to brokered deposits. Since June 30, 2008, the Bank has been proactive in reducing brokered deposits by 48by 59.91%, or $~~197~~238.54 million, while increasing core deposits by $~~197~~188.69 million during the same period.

(viii) The Bank has adopted a policy limiting the use of interest reserves.

(ix) A three-year profit plan has been developed and is updated quarterly and reviewed by the oversight committee.

(x) The Bank has submitted all required progress reports to the appropriate supervisory authorities.

On March 26, 2010, the Company entered into a written agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) and the GDBF, pursuant to which the Company is prohibited from declaring or paying dividends without prior written consent from the regulators. In addition, pursuant to the Agreement, without the prior written consent of regulators, the Company is prohibited from taking dividends, or any other form of payment representing a reduction of capital, from the Bank; paying interest, principal or other sums on subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities; incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt; redeeming any shares of the Company’s common stock; and increasing salaries or bonuses paid to executive officers. All salaries, bonuses and fees, excluding the reimbursement of expenses valued at less than $500 in the aggregate per month per executive officer, must be preapproved by the board of directors on a regular basis. In appointing any new director or any executive officer, the Company is required to notify regulatory authorities and comply with restrictions on indemnification and severance. The Company will also provide quarterly written progress reports to the Federal Reserve Board.

Within 60 days of the Agreement, the Company was required to submit to the Federal Reserve Board a written plan designed to maintain sufficient capital at the Company, on a consolidated basis, and at the Bank. The Agreement does not contain specific target capital ratios or specific timelines, but requires that the plan address the Company’s current and future capital requirements, the Bank’s current and future capital requirements, the adequacy of the Bank’s capital taking into account its risk profile, and the source and timing of additional funds necessary to fulfill the Company’s and the Bank’s future capital requirements.

(3) Going Concern

As a result of the extraordinary effects of what may ultimately be the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, the Company’s and the Bank’s capital have been significantly depleted. The Company recorded a net loss of $59.2 million in 2009 and continued in the first ~~half~~nine months of 2010 in recording a net loss of $59.73 million. These net losses are primarily the result of significant increases in the provision for loan losses in 2009, the recognition of goodwill impairment in 2009, the establishment of a valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax asset in 2009, a decrease in the Company’s net interest margin due to the loss of interest on non-accrual loans and from the purchase of low-yielding investment securities during 2009, a significant increase in

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

the recognition of goodwill impairment in 2009, the establishment of a valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax asset in 2009, a decrease in the Company’s net interest margin due to the loss of interest on non-accrual loans and from the purchase of low-yielding investment securities during 2009, a significant increase in the FDIC quarterly assessment in 2009 and 2010 and increases in other real estate expenses due to the increase in foreclosed properties in 2009 and 2010. The impact of the current financial crisis in the U.S. and abroad is having far-reaching consequences and it is difficult to say at this point when the economy will begin to recover. As a result, it cannot be assured that the Company will be able to resume profitable operations in the near future, if at all.

The Company and the Bank are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support their operations. As part of the Order, the Bank is required to increase its capital and maintain certain regulatory capital ratios. To comply with the Order, the Bank is required to have Tier 1 capital in such an amount as to equal or exceed 8% of the Bank’s total assets and total risk-based capital in an amount as to equal or exceed 10% of the Bank’s risk-weighted assets. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Bank’s total capital to risk-weighted assets and ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets were 5.8349% and 3.2714%, respectively. The Company’s existing capital resources may not satisfy the requirements for the foreseeable future and may not be sufficient to offset any additional problem assets. Further, should erosion to the Bank’s asset quality continue and require significant additional provision for credit losses, resulting in consistent net operating losses at the Bank, the Bank’s capital levels will decline and the Company will need to raise additional capital to satisfy the Order.

The Company’s ability to raise additional capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside its control, and on its financial performance. Accordingly, the Company cannot be certain of its ability to raise additional capital on terms acceptable to them. The Company’s inability to raise capital or comply with the terms of the Order raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s Board of Directors is seeking all strategic alternatives to enhance the stability of the Company, including a capital investment. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to comply with the regulatory requirements. In addition, a transaction involving equity financing, would result in substantial dilution to current stockholders and could adversely affect the price of the Company’s common stock. As a result of the Bank’s financial condition, the regulatory authorities are continually monitoring its liquidity and capital adequacy. Based on their assessment of the Bank’s ability to continue to operate in a safe and sound manner, including its compliance with established capital requirements, regulatory authorities may take other and further actions, including placing the Bank into conservatorship or receivership, to protect the interests of depositors.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future, and do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability or classification of assets, and the amounts or classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of any regulatory action, which would affect the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s independent public accountants have expressed, in their opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009, that a substantial doubt exists regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

(4) Net Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period while the effects of potential shares outstanding during the period are included in diluted earnings per share. Approximately 381,000 shares of reserved for issuance pursuant to options and warrants and 68,965 shares of restricted stock were not included in the diluted loss per share computation for the three and nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 as they are anti-dilutive.

The reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings (loss) per share” and “diluted earnings (loss) per share” for each period is presented as follows:

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net loss	$	(4,037,867	)	$	(23,781,709	)	$	(5,670,908	)	$	(23,039,956	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding	4,211,780			4,211,780			4,211,780			4,211,780
Shares issued from assumed exercise of common stock equivalents	—			—			—			—
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding	4,211,780			4,211,780			4,211,780			4,211,780
Loss per share:
Basic	$	(0.96	)	$	(5.65	)	$	(1.35	)	$	(5.47	)
Diluted	$	(0.96	)	$	(5.65	)	$	(1.35	)	$	(5.47	)

The reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings (loss) per share” and “diluted earnings (loss) per share” for each period is presented as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009

Net loss	$	(3,658,547	)	$	(8,287,965	)	$	(9,329,455	)	$	(31,327,921	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding	4,211,780			4,211,780			4,211,780			4,211,780
Shares issued from assumed exercise of common stock equivalents	—			—			—			—
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding	4,211,780			4,211,780			4,211,780			4,211,780
Loss per share:
Basic	$	(0.87	)	$	(1.97	)	$	(2.22	)	$	(7.44	)

Diluted	$	(0.87	)	$	(1.97	)	$	(2.22	)	$	(7.44	)

(5) Investment Securities

Debt and equity securities have been classified in the balance sheet according to management’s intent. All investments as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are ~~classified~~ classified as available for sale. The following table reflects the amortized cost and estimated fair values of the investments:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
			Gross		Gross
June 30, 2010
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Estimated
September 30, 2010	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Non-mortgage backed debt securities of :
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	~~20,511,283~~—	$	~~11,032~~—	$	—		$	~~20,522,315~~—
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	115,~~065~~007,~~732~~037		~~412~~97,~~432~~051		—			115,~~478~~104,~~164~~088
State and political subdivisions	15,~~259~~206,~~851~~929		~~321~~440,~~893~~816		(~~244~~316,~~884~~670		)	15,~~336~~331,~~860~~075
Other investments	250,000		~~2,630~~—		—(34,802		)	~~252~~215,~~630~~198
Total non-mortgage backed debt securities	4720,~~086~~463,~~866~~966		~~747~~537,~~987~~867		(~~244~~351,~~884~~472		)	4720,~~589~~650,~~969~~361
Mortgage backed securities	2419,~~024~~582,~~508~~141		~~707~~470,~~477~~553		~~(6,883~~—		)	2420,~~725~~052,~~102~~694
Equity securities	39,428		—		(1920,~~936~~394		)	19,~~492~~034
Total	$	7140,~~150~~085,~~802~~535	$	1,~~455~~008,~~464~~420	$	(~~271~~371,~~703~~866	)	$	7240,~~334~~722,~~563~~089
December 31, 2009
Non-mortgage backed debt securities of :
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	57,114,838	$	42,027	$	—		$	57,156,865
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	27,191,611		425,213		—			27,616,824
State and political subdivisions	15,404,985		234,535		(483,685		)	15,155,835
Other investments	250,000		9,208		—			259,208
Total non-mortgage backed debt securities	99,961,434		710,983		(483,685		)	100,188,732
Mortgage backed securities	26,028,829		733,712		(51,100		)	26,711,441
Equity securities	39,428		—		—			39,428
Total	$	126,029,691	$	1,444,695	$	(534,785	)	$	126,939,601

The amortized cost and fair values of pledged securities for public deposits and for federal funds lines of credit with correspondent banks were as follows:

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Amortized cost	$	22,231,325	$	23,141,062
Fair value	$	22,487,456	$	23,003,692

The amortized cost and fair values of pledged securities for public deposits and for federal funds lines of credit with correspondent banks were as follows:

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities available for sale at June 30, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities for mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities because in certain cases borrowers can prepay obligations without prepayment penalties. Therefore, these securities are not included in the following maturity summary.

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Amortized cost	$	20,028,613	$	23,141,062
Fair value	$	20,636,370	$	23,003,692

	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
Non-mortgage backed debt securities:
Due in one year or less	$	20,511,283	$	20,522,315
Due after one year through five years	7,616,815		7,784,982
Due after five years through ten years	6,886,157		7,130,702
Due after ten years	12,072,611		12,151,970
Total non-mortgage backed debt securities	$	47,086,866	$	47,589,969

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities available for sale at September 30, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities for mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities because in certain cases borrowers can prepay obligations without prepayment penalties. Therefore, these securities are not included in the following maturity summary.

			Estimated
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Non-mortgage backed debt securities:
Due in one year or less	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years	3,622,236		3,663,800
Due after five years through ten years	6,584,773		6,803,072
Due after ten years	10,256,957		10,183,489
Total non-mortgage backed debt securities	$	20,463,966	$	20,650,361

The fair value is established by an independent pricing service as of the approximate dates indicated. The differences between the amortized cost and fair value reflect current interest rates and represent the potential loss (or gain) had the portfolio been liquidated on that date. Security losses (or gains) are realized only in the event of dispositions prior to maturity.

Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, follows:

	June 30, 2010
	September 30, 2010
	Less Than Twelve Months					More Than Twelve Months
Securities Available for Sale	Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
	Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated
Securities Available for Sale	Losses			Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value
Non-mortgage backed debt securities of:
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
State and political subdivisions	$	(245,125	)	$	2,736,344	$	(71,545	)	$	1,290,454
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	—			—		—			—
Other investments	(34,802		)	215,198		—			—
State and political subdivisions	(691		)	346,031		(244,193		)	3,754,373
Total non-mortgage backed debt securities	(279,927		)	2,951,542		(71,545		)	1,290,454
Total non-mortgage backed debt securities	(691		)	346,031		(244,193		)	3,754,373
Mortgage backed securities	—			—		—			—
Mortgage backed securities	(6,883		)	2,431,981		—			—
Equity securities	(20,394		)	19,034		—			—
Equity securities	(19,936		)	19,492		—			—
Total	$	(300,321	)	$	2,970,576	$	(71,545	)	$	1,290,454
Total	$	(27,510	)	$	2,797,504	$	(244,193	)	$	3,754,373

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2009
	Less Than Twelve Months					More Than Twelve Months
Securities Available for Sale	Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
	Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated
Securities Available for Sale	Losses			Fair Value		Losses			Fair Value
Non-mortgage backed debt securities of:
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
State and political subdivisions	$	(6,966	)	$	2,466,046	$	(476,719	)	$	4,814,097
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises	—			—		—			—
Other investments	—			—		—			—
State and political subdivisions	(6,966		)	2,466,046		(476,719		)	4,814,097
Total non-mortgage backed debt securities	(6,966		)	2,466,046		(476,719		)	4,814,097
Mortgage backed securities	(51,100		)	7,799,758		—			—
Equity securities	—			—		—			—
Total	$	(58,066	)	$	10,265,804	$	(476,719	)	$	4,814,097

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~fourteen~~twelve debt securities had unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 0.3588% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and industry analysts’ reports. As management has the ability and intent to hold debt securities until maturity, or for the foreseeable future if classified as available for sale and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary.

The following table summarizes securities disposal activities for the three month and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Proceeds from sales	$	—11,347,462		$	~~37,033,981~~—		$	—11,347,462		$	5051,~~771~~611,~~869~~819
Proceeds from calls	132,545,000			25,~~339~~040,~~950~~000			1618,~~090~~635,000			25,~~519~~220,~~950~~000
Proceeds from maturities	2220,500,000			2527,~~490~~347,~~000~~247			3657,~~500~~000,000			2756,~~240~~080,~~000~~247
Paydowns	2,~~026~~208,~~584~~266			41,~~622~~329,~~145~~364			46,~~525~~733,~~518~~784			89,~~238~~567,~~517~~881
Total	$	3836,~~071~~600,~~584~~728		$	6933,~~486~~716,~~076~~611		$	5793,~~115~~716,~~518~~246		$	88122,~~770~~479,~~336~~947
Gross gains	$	42557,~~906~~149		$	116,~~153,008~~119		$	42600,~~906~~055		$	1,~~384~~400,~~133~~252
Gross losses	—(536		)	—(777		)	—(536		)	(1011,~~697~~474		)
Impairment losses	—			~~(57,618~~—		)	—			(57,618		)
Net gains of securities	$	42556,~~906~~613		$	115,~~095,390~~342		$	42599,~~906~~519		$	1,~~315~~331,~~818~~160
Income tax expense	$	—		$	~~372~~5,~~433~~216		$	—		$	~~447~~472,~~378~~185

During the ~~second~~third quarter of ~~2009~~2010, the ~~Company~~Bank ~~recognized~~sold anapproximately ~~impairment~~$11.3 ~~loss~~million ofin ~~$57,618~~U.S. onagency anand ~~equity~~mortgage ~~investment~~backed insecurities ~~Silverton~~to ~~Bank,~~capture gains on securities prepaying at a ~~financial~~high ~~institution~~pace. During ~~that~~the ~~failed~~second ~~during~~quarter of 2009, the Bank ~~quarter~~restructured approximately $36 million in U. ~~The~~S. ~~impairment~~agency ~~loss~~and ~~represents~~mortgage backed ~~the~~securities ~~full~~to ~~amount~~capture ofgains on securities prepaying at a high pace, to offset FDIC special assessment and to shorten the ~~Company’s~~average ~~investment~~maturity inof ~~Silverton~~the portfolio.

During the second quarter of 2009, the Bank restructured approximately $36 million in U.S. agency and mortgage backed securities to capture gains on securities prepaying at high speeds, to offset FDIC special assessment and to shorten the average maturity of the portfolio.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $57,618 on an equity investment in Silverton Bank, a financial institution that failed during the quarter. The impairment loss represents the full amount of the Company’s investment in Silverton.

(6) Loans

The following is a summary of the loan portfolio by purpose code categories:

	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	September 30,			December 31,
Commercial	$	43,643,750		$	51,673,928
	2010			2009
Real estate - commercial	311,001,349			304,468,535
Commercial	$	44,788,031		$	51,673,928
Real estate - construction	204,327,888			263,270,892
Real estate - commercial	273,745,608			304,468,535
Real estate - mortgage	98,808,541			92,012,553
Real estate - construction	190,463,314			263,270,892
Obligations of political subdivisions in the U.S.	254,396			294,779
Real estate - mortgage	93,154,714			92,012,553
Consumer	5,911,741			6,838,169
Obligations of political subdivisions in the U.S.	204,792			294,779
Total loans	663,947,665			718,558,856
Consumer	5,488,624			6,838,169
Total loans	607,845,083			718,558,856
Less:
Unearned loan fees	(~~165~~122,~~935~~203		)	(251,941		)
Allowance for loan losses	(1918,~~323~~652,~~225~~884		)	(21,478,748		)
Loans, net	$	~~644~~589,~~458~~069,~~505~~996		$	696,828,167

The Company considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include loans which are not accruing interest and restructured loans which are accruing interest. The Company measures impairment of a loan on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Non-accrual loans are loans which collection of interest is not probable and all cash flows received are recorded as reduction in principal. Restructured loans have modified terms from the original contract that give the debtor a more manageable arrangement for meeting financial obligations under their current situation. Amounts of impaired loans that are not probable of collection are charged off immediately.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all impaired loans with a related allowance have been evaluated based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral. Impaired loans without a related allowance were previously written down to the net realizable value of the collateral or the collateral was sufficient to ensure no principal loss. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company had approximately $5761.49 million in impaired loans without a related allowance with the Company having previously partially charged off approximately $116.14 million to date to write down the loans to their net realizable value. Impaired loans and related amounts included in the allowance for loan losses at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:

	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	September 30,				December 31,
	Balance		Allowance Amount		Balance		Allowance Amount
	2010				2009
Impaired loans with related allowance	$	50,897,156	$	4,012,221	$	3,261,723	$	1,024,001
			Allowance				Allowance
Impaired loans without related allowance	57,427,645		—		112,031,829		—
	Balance		Amount		Balance		Amount
Impaired loans with related allowance	$	26,694,726	$	5,267,864	$	3,261,723	$	1,024,001
Impaired loans without related allowance	61,866,212		—		112,031,829		—

The Company had $1216.30 million and $12.8 million in loans that would be defined as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, respectively. Of those amounts, $1013.5 million and $1.6 million were accruing as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, as they were performing in accordance with their restructured terms. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, there were ~~approximately~~ ~~$989 thousand in TDR loans that had a related allowance of~~ approximately ~~$357 thousand. At December 31, 2009, there were no TDR loans that had a related allowance.~~

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

$2.0 million in TDR loans that had a related allowance of approximately $501 thousand. At December 31, 2009, there were no TDR loans that had a related allowance.

(7) Allowance for Loan Losses

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30,

Six Months Ended June 30,

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2010

2009

2010

2009

Beginning balance

2119,~~148~~323,~~485~~225

1114,~~492~~910,~~656~~792

21,478,748

11,671,534

Add:

Provision for possible loan losses

2,~~034~~178,000

511,~~718~~352,000

35,~~336~~514,000

617,~~068~~420,000

Subtotal

2321,~~182~~501,~~485~~225

1726,~~210~~262,~~656~~792

2426,~~814~~992,748

1729,~~739~~091,534

Less:

Loans charged off

43,~~029~~089,~~703~~252

211,~~317~~797,~~177~~795

58,~~721~~810,~~036~~288

214,~~911~~708,~~003~~798

Recoveries on loans previously charged off

(~~170~~240,~~443~~911

)

(17137,~~313~~757

)

(~~229~~470,~~513~~424

)

(82220,~~261~~018

)

Net loans charged off

32,~~859~~848,~~260~~341

211,~~299~~660,~~864~~038

58,~~491~~339,~~523~~864

214,~~828~~488,~~742~~780

Balance, end of period

1918,~~323~~652,~~225~~884

14,~~910~~602,~~792~~754

1918,~~323~~652,~~225~~884

14,~~910~~602,~~792~~754

(8) Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets consist of non-accrual loans, accruing loans 90 days past due, repossessed assets and other real estate owned. The following summarizes non-performing assets:

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30.		December 31,
	2010		2009
Accruing loans 90 days past due	$	—	$	644,920
Non-accrual loans	~~108~~88,~~324~~560,~~802~~938		115,293,553
Repossessed assets	105,~~838~~375		1,000
Other real estate owned	41,720,587		21,066,480
Other real estate	61,612,054		21,066,480
Total non-performing assets	$	150,~~056~~178,~~227~~367	$	137,005,953

Nonperforming assets increased $13.12 million, or 9.5361%, from December 31, 2009 to ~~June~~September 30, 2010. Non-accrual loans decreased approximately $726.07 million from December 31, 2009 to ~~June~~September 30, 2010, largely due to approximately $2547.15 million moving to other real estate ~~owned~~ owned and other assets, $58.76 million in partial charge-offs on non-accrual loans and approximately $48.6 million in pay downs. During the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010, ~~there was~~ approximately $2838.4 0 million in loans were moved to non-accrual. All non-accrual loans are adequately collateralized based on management’s judgment and supported by recent collateral appraisals. Other real estate owned increased $2040.7 5 million from December 31, 2009 to ~~June~~September 30, 2010. This increase is largely due to the addition of $2446.37 million in foreclosed properties and $~~419~~839 thousand in capitalized improvements on several foreclosed properties being offset by the sale of $35.63 million in foreclosed properties resulting in a loss of $51 225 thousand on these properties. The Company has written down $~~350~~1.5 ~~thousand~~million for several foreclosed properties based upon updated appraisals.

The Company’s policy is to place loans on non-accrual status when it appears that the collection of interest in accordance with the terms of the loan is doubtful. Any loan which becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest is automatically placed on non-accrual. Exceptions are allowed for 90-day past due loans when such loans are well secured and in process of collection.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company’s other real estate owned consisted of the following:

	As of June 30, 2010			As of December 31, 2009
	As of September 30, 2010			As of December 31, 2009
	Number of Properties	Carrying Amount		Number of Properties	Carrying Amount
1-4 Family residential properties	2325	$	2,~~313~~732,~~906~~127	23	~~2,958,213~~$	2,958,213
Multifamily residential properties	24	113,~~675~~719,~~096~~694		2	238,225
Nonfarm nonresidential properties	1418	913,~~738~~513,~~879~~773		13	8,994,372
Farmland properties	23	~~950~~1,~~604~~252,104		—	—
Construction & land development properties	5152	2730,~~042~~394,~~102~~356		35	8,875,670
Total	92102	$	4161,~~720~~612,~~587~~054	73	~~21,066,480~~$	21,066,480

All properties are being actively marketed for sale and management is continuously monitoring these properties in order to minimize any losses.

Other real estate owned is defined as real estate acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure. At the time of foreclosure, an appraisal is obtained on the real estate. All other real estate owned properties are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated cost to sell. If the fair value less estimated costs to sell at the time of foreclosure is less than the loan balance, the deficiency is charged against the allowance for loan losses. An updated appraisal is ordered on each anniversary if the property is owned for more than one year. If the fair value of the other real estate owned, less estimated costs to sell at the time of foreclosure, decreases during the holding period, the other real estate owned is written down with a charge to noninterest expense. When the other real estate owned is sold, a gain or loss is recognized on the sale for the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the other real estate owned.

(9) Shareholders’ Equity

On June 11, 2010, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to increase the total number of authorized shares of common stock from 10 million shares to 110 million shares. The amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation was approved by the board of directors on March 18, 2010 and by shareholders of the Company at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 8, 2010, in accordance with O.C.G.A. 14-2-1003.

The Company granted ~~restricted stock for~~ 68,965 shares of restricted stock to Edward P. Loomis, Jr., President of the Bank. The stock will be vested in installments over a period of four years. All shares of restricted stock will be held by the Company until the conditions are satisfied. All shares are nonvested as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010. Compensation expense totaling $612,~~250~~500 was recognized ~~during~~as ~~the second quarter~~ of September 30, 2010 in connection with restricted stock.

(10) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

Fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, generally accepted accounting principles establish a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

Fair Value Hierarchy

Level 1 – —Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2 –— Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Level 3 –— Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded or disclosed at fair value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents — For disclosure purposes for cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with other banks, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities Available for Sale - Securities available-for-sale consist of U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. government sponsored enterprises, state and political subdivisions, corporate bonds, mortgage backed securities and equity securities. They are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions.

· U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. government sponsored enterprises, corporate bonds, mortgage backed securities and equity securities are valued primarily using data from an independent third-party pricing service for similar securities in an active market as applicable. Pricing from the independent third party service is generally based on quoted prices of similar instruments (including matrix pricing); these valuations are Level 2 measurements.

· State and political subdivisions are generally based on data from an independent third-party pricing service for similar securities. Where such comparable data is not available, the Company develops valuations based on assumptions that are not readily observable in the market place; these valuations are Level 3 measurements.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock — For disclosure purposes, for Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loans Held for Sale - For loans held for sale, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value given the short-term nature of the loans and similarity to what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios of loans with similar characteristics. Therefore, the Company records the loans held for sale as nonrecurring Level 2.

Loans - The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, a creditor may measure impairment based on a loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if repayment of the loan is dependent upon the sale of the underlying collateral. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008~~December 31, 2009, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the ~~fair~~ fair value of the collateral. Impaired ~~loans~~ loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral ~~require~~ require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

For disclosure purposes, the fair value of fixed rate loans which are not considered impaired is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. For unimpaired variable rate loans, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value for disclosure purposes.

Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance — For disclosure purposes, for cash surrender value of life insurance, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - Goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to impairment testing. A current market valuation method is used to analyze the carrying value of goodwill for impairment. This valuation method estimates the fair value of the Bank based on the price that would be received to sell the Bank as a whole in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This valuation method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In the event the valuation value for the Bank is less than the carrying value of goodwill, the asset amount is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model. As such, the Company classifies goodwill and other intangible assets subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.

Other Real Estate Owned — Other real estate is adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to other real estate. Subsequently, other real estate is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the other real estate as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market prices, the Company records the other real estate as nonrecurring Level 3.

Deposits — For disclosure purposes, the fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

FHLB Advances — For disclosure purposes, the fair value of the ~~Bank~~Company’s fixed rate borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flows, based on the ~~Bank~~Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. For variable rate borrowings, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Subordinated Debentures — For disclosure purposes, for subordinated debentures, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Junior Subordinated Debentures — For disclosure purposes, the fair value of the ~~Bank~~Company’s junior subordinated debentures is estimated using quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted future cash flow analyses based on current interest rates, liquidity and credit spreads.

Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit — Because commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are generally short-term and at variable rates, the contract value and estimated fair value associated with these instruments are immaterial.

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

	As of September 30,
	2010
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Debt securities available-for-sale
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	5,104,088		—		5,104,088		—
State and political subdivisions	15,331,075		—		15,331,075		—
Other investments	215,198		—		215,198		—
Mortgage backed securities	20,052,694		2,520,312		17,532,382		—
Total debt securities available-for-sale	40,703,055		2,520,312		38,182,743		—
Equity securities available-for-sale	19,034		—		19,034		—
Total available-for-sale securities	$	40,722,089	$	2,520,312	$	38,201,777	$	—

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As of June 30,

As of December 31,

2010

2009

Assets

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets

Debt securities available-for-sale

U.S. Treasury obligations

2057,~~522~~156,~~315~~865

—

2057,~~522~~156,~~315~~865

—

U.S. government sponsored enterprises

1127,~~478~~616,~~164~~824

—

1127,~~478~~616,~~164~~824

—

State and political subdivisions

15,~~336~~155,~~860~~835

—

1415,~~544~~155,~~906~~835

~~791,954~~—

Other investments

~~252~~259,~~630~~208

—

~~252~~259,~~630~~208

—

Mortgage backed securities

2426,~~725~~711,~~102~~441

—

2426,~~725~~711,~~102~~441

—

Total debt securities available-for-sale

72126,~~315~~900,~~071~~173

—

71126,~~523~~900,~~117~~173

~~791,954~~—

Equity securities available-for-sale

1939,~~492~~428

—

1939,~~492~~428

—

Total available-for-sale securities

72126,~~334~~939,~~563~~601

—

71126,~~542~~939,~~609~~601

~~791,954~~—

	As of December 31,
	2009
Assets	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Debt securities available-for-sale
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	57,156,865	$	—	$	57,156,865	$	—
U.S. government sponsored enterprises	27,616,824		—		27,616,824		—
State and political subdivisions	15,155,835		—		15,155,835		—
Other investments	259,208		—		259,208		—
Mortgage backed securities	26,711,441		—		26,711,441		—
Total debt securities available-for-sale	126,900,173		—		126,900,173		—
Equity securities available-for-sale	39,428		—		39,428		—
Total available-for-sale securities	$	126,939,601	$	—	$	126,939,601	$	—

During the third quarter of 2010, the Company changed its investment bond accountants. Therefore, the level of measurement techniques to evaluate some of the securities available-for-sale changed to include at least one security in the Level 1 category while the other securities remain in the Level 2 category since they are using different pricing sources and different matrixes for the securities available-for-sale.

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company’s independent third-party pricing service changed its methodology for one of its state and political subdivision securities. Therefore, the level of measurement techniques to evaluate this security available-for-sale changed from a Level 2 category to a Level 3 category since there was no readily observable assumptions in the market place and valuation was determined from other model-based techniques.

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

	As of June 30,
	As of September 30,
	2010
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Loans	$	~~104~~84,~~944~~819,~~654~~793	$	—	$	~~104~~84,~~944~~819,~~654~~793	$	—
Loans held for sale	1285,~~453,490~~026		—		1285,~~453,490~~026		—
Other real estate owned	4161,~~720~~612,~~587~~054		—		4161,~~720~~612,~~587~~054		—
Total assets at fair value	$	~~148~~146,~~118~~716,~~731~~873	$	—	$	~~148~~146,~~118~~716,~~731~~873	$	—

	As of December 31,
	2009
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Loans	$	125,166,754	$	—	$	125,166,754	$	—
Loans held for sale	1,089,108		—		1,089,108		—
Other real estate owned	21,066,480		—		21,066,480		—

Total assets at fair value	$	147,322,342	$	—	$	147,322,342	$	—

The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities which are required to be either disclosed or recorded at fair value at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	As of December 31,
	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	2009
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Loans	$	125,166,754	$	—	$	125,166,754	$	—
Assets:
Loans held for sale	1,089,108		—		1,089,108		—
Cash and cash equivalents	$	104,811,263	$	104,811,263	$	33,391,677	$	33,391,677
Other real estate owned	21,066,480		—		21,066,480		—
Securities available for sale	40,722,089		40,722,089		126,939,601		126,939,601
Total assets at fair value	$	147,322,342	$	—	$	147,322,342	$	—
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock	4,007,400		4,007,400		4,316,800		4,316,800
Loans held for sale	285,026		285,026		1,089,108		1,089,108
Loans, net	589,069,996		589,111,059		696,828,167		698,284,092
Cash surrender value of life insurance	13,409,122		13,409,122		13,011,018		13,011,018
Other real estate owned	61,612,054		61,612,054		21,066,480		21,066,480
Liabilities:
Deposits	786,302,786		791,303,628		861,156,888		866,219,696
FHLB borrowings	29,000,000		29,924,932		39,000,000		39,984,264
Subordinated debentures	1,400,000		1,400,000		1,400,000		1,400,000
Junior subordinated debentures	10,310,000		2,243,402		10,310,000		10,310,000

The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities which are required to be either disclosed or recorded at fair value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:

	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	83,661,751	$	83,661,751	$	33,391,677.00	$	33,391,677
Securities available for sale	72,334,563		72,334,563		126,939,601		126,939,601
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock	4,316,800		4,316,800		4,316,800		4,316,800
Loans held for sale	1,453,490		1,453,490		1,089,108		1,089,108
Loans, net	644,458,505		644,789,196		696,828,167		698,284,092
Cash surrender value of life insurance	13,275,536		13,275,536		13,011,018		13,011,018
Other real estate owned	41,720,587		41,720,587		21,066,480		21,066,480
Liabilities:
Deposits	835,107,635		838,854,327		861,156,888		866,219,696
FHLB borrowings	34,000,000		34,990,692		39,000,000		39,984,264
Subordinated debentures	1,400,000		1,400,000		1,400,000		1,400,000
Junior subordinated debentures	10,310,000		1,811,364		10,310,000		10,310,000

Limitations - Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial statement elements. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the fair value of assets and liabilities that are not required to be recorded or disclosed at fair value like the mortgage banking operation, brokerage network and premises and equipment.

(11)Regulatory Matters

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimal capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

In addition, quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth below in the table) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and of Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined in the regulations). To comply with the Order, the Bank is required to have Tier 1 capital in such an amount as to equal or exceed 8% of the Bank’s total assets and total risk-based capital as to equal or exceed 10% of the Bank’s risk-weighted assets. As of September 30, 2010, the Bank’s ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets and ratio of Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets were 5.49% and 4.02%, respectively. The Company and the Bank were considered “significantly undercapitalized” by bank regulatory authorities as of September 30, 2010 and “undercapitalized” as of December 31, 2009. As a result, on March 26, 2010, the Bank received a Notification of Prompt Corrective Action from the FDIC and, in accordance with Section 325.104 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations, the Bank was required, among other things, to file a written capital restoration plan with the FDIC.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

~~have~~The ~~Tier 1 capital in such an amount as to equal or exceed 8% of the Bank~~Company’s ~~total assets~~ and ~~total risk-based capital as to equal or exceed 10% of~~ the Bank’s ~~risk-weighted~~ ~~assets. As~~actual ~~of June 30, 2010, the Bank’s ratio of total~~ capital toamounts ~~risk-weighted assets~~ and ~~ratio~~ratios ~~of Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets were 5.83% and 4.36%, respectively. The Company and the Bank were considered “significantly undercapitalized” by bank regulatory authorities~~ as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and ~~“undercapitalized” as of~~ December 31, 2009~~. As~~ a result, on March 26, 2010, the Bank received a Notification of Prompt Corrective Action from the FDIC and, in accordance with Section 325.104 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations, the Bank was required, among other things, to file a written capital restoration plan with the FDIC.follow:

The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 follow:

										To Be Well Capitalized
					For Capital					Under Prompt Corrective
	Actual				Adequacy Purposes					Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount			Ratio		Amount			Ratio
*September 30, 2010*

Total Risk-Based Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	37,396,000	5.55	%	$	53,904,144	>	8.0	%	N/A			N/A
Bank	37,018,000		5.49	%	53,942,441		>	8.0	%	$	67,428,051	>	10.0	%

Tier I Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	24,018,000	3.56	%	$	26,986,517	>	4.0	%	N/A			N/A
Bank	27,069,000		4.02	%	26,934,328		>	4.0	%	$	40,401,493	>	6.0	%

Tier I Capital To Average Assets
Consolidated	$	24,018,000	2.79	%	$	34,434,409	>	4.0	%	N/A			N/A
Bank	27,069,000		3.14	%	34,482,803		>	4.0	%	$	43,103,503	>	5.0	%

*December 31, 2009*

Total Risk-Based Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	47,485,000	6.28	%	$	60,490,446	>	8.0	%	N/A			N/A
Bank	46,763,000		6.19	%	60,436,834		>	8.0	%	$	75,546,042	>	10.0	%

Tier I Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	36,490,000	4.83	%	$	30,219,462	>	4.0	%	N/A			N/A
Bank	35,771,000		4.73	%	30,250,317		>	4.0	%	$	45,375,476	>	6.0	%

Tier I Capital To Average Assets
Consolidated	$	36,490,000	3.44	%	$	42,430,233	>	4.0	%	N/A			N/A
Bank	35,771,000		3.37	%	42,458,160		>	4.0	%	$	53,072,700	>	5.0	%

										To Be Well Capitalized
					For Capital					Under Prompt Corrective
	Actual				Adequacy Purposes					Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount			Ratio		Amount		Ratio
June 30, 2010
Total Risk-Based Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	41,275,000	5.90	%	$	55,966,102	>	8.0	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	40,795,000		5.83	%	55,979,417		>	8.0	%	69,974,271	>	10.0	%
Tier I Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	28,788,000	4.11	%	$	28,017,518	>	4.0	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	30,522,000		4.36	%	28,001,835		>	4.0	%	42,002,752	>	6.0	%
Tier I Capital To Average Assets
Consolidated	$	28,788,000	3.08	%	$	37,387,013	>	4.0	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	30,522,000		3.27	%	37,335,780		>	4.0	%	46,669,725	>	5.0	%
December 31, 2009
Total Risk-Based Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	47,485,000	6.28	%	$	60,490,446	>	8.0	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	46,763,000		6.19	%	60,436,834		>	8.0	%	75,546,042	>	10.0	%
Tier I Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	36,490,000	4.83	%	$	30,219,462	>	4.0	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	35,771,000		4.73	%	30,250,317		>	4.0	%	45,375,476	>	6.0	%
Tier I Capital To Average Assets
Consolidated	$	36,490,000	3.44	%	$	42,430,233	>	4.0	%	N/A		N/A
Bank	35,771,000		3.37	%	42,458,160		>	4.0	%	53,072,700	>	5.0	%

(12)Accounting Standards Updates

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01, Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (“ASU No. 2010-01”). ASU No. 2010-01 provides guidance on the accounting for distributions offering shareholders the choice of receiving cash or stock. Under such guidance, the stock portion of the distribution is not considered to be a stock dividend, and for purposes of calculating earnings per share it is deemed a new share issuance not requiring retroactive restatement. This guidance is effective for the

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

~~first~~(12)Accounting ~~reporting~~Standards ~~period, including interim periods, ending after December 15, 2009. It is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.~~Updates

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01, Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (“ASU No. 2010-01”). ASU No. 2010-01 provides guidance on the accounting for distributions offering shareholders the choice of receiving cash or stock. Under such guidance, the stock portion of the distribution is not considered to be a stock dividend, and for purposes of calculating earnings per share it is deemed a new share issuance not requiring retroactive restatement. This guidance is effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, ending after December 15, 2009. It is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-04, Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs (“ASU No. 2010-04”). It is not expected to have an impact on the Company.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU No. 2010-06”). ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB ASC Topic 820-10-50, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, to require additional information to be disclosed principally regarding Level 3 measurements and transfers to and from Level 1 and 2. In addition, enhanced disclosure is required concerning inputs and valuation techniques used to determine Level 2 and Level 3 measurements. This guidance is generally effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009; however, requirements to disclose separately purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the Level 3 reconciliation are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 (and for interim periods within such years). ASU No. 2010-06 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position, and will have a minimal impact on its disclosures.

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure ~~Requirements~~ Requirements (“ASU No. 2010-09”). ASU No. 2010-09 amends FASB ASC Subtopic 855-10, Subsequent Events, to remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date through which ~~subsequent~~ subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. This change alleviates potential conflicts between ASC Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. ASU No. 2010-09 is ~~not~~ not expected to have a material impact on the Company.

In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Is Accounted for as a Single Asset (“ASU No. 2010-18”). ASU No. 2010-18 provides guidance on the accounting for loan modifications when the loan is part of a pool of loans accounted for as a single asset such as acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon acquisition that are accounted for under the guidance in ASC 310-30. ASU No. 2010-18 addresses diversity in practice on whether a loan that is part of a pool of loans accounted for as a single asset should be removed from that pool upon a modification that would constitute a troubled debt restructuring or remain in the pool after modification. ASU No. 2010-18 clarifies that modifications of loans that are accounted for within a ~~pool~~ pool under ASC 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool ~~even~~ even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a ~~troubled~~ troubled debt restructuring. An entity ~~will~~ will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which ~~the~~ the loan is included is impaired if the expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments in this update do not require any additional disclosures and are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. ASU 2010-18 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (“ASU No. 2010-20”). ASU No. 2010-20 requires disclosures regarding loans and the allowance for loan losses that are disaggregated by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable. Existing disclosures were amended to require a rollforward of the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment, with the ending balance broken out by basis of impairment method, as well as the recorded investment in the respective loans. Nonaccrual and impaired loans by class must also be shown. ASU No. 2010-20 also requires disclosures regarding: 1) credit quality indicators by class, 2) aging of past due loans by class, 3) troubled debt restructuring (“TDRs”) by class and their effect on the allowance for loan losses, 4) defaults on TDRs by class and their effect on the allowance for loan losses, and 5) significant purchases and sales of loans disaggregated by portfolio segment. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, for end of period type disclosures. Activity related disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. ASU No. 2010-20 will have an impact on the Company’s disclosures, but not its financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

For Each of the Three ~~Months~~ Months and ~~Six~~Nine Months in the Period Ended

~~June~~ September 30, 2010 and 2009

The following discussion of financial condition as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009, and the results of operations for the three months and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 compared to the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2009 should be read in ~~conjunction~~ conjunction with the condensed financial statements and accompanying footnotes appearing in this report.

Advisory Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The statements contained in this report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We caution readers of this report that such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our expectations of future performance is based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations.

Factors which could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, among other things:

· Deterioration in the condition of borrowers resulting in significant increase in loan losses and provisions for those losses;

· the potential that loan charge-offs may exceed the allowance for loan losses or that such allowance will be increased as a result of factors beyond our control or the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses;

· changes in loan underwriting, credit review or loss reserve policies associated with economic conditions, examination conclusions, or regulatory developments;

· our dependence on senior management;

· competition from existing financial institutions, including commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds, operating in our market areas and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone and the Internet;

· changes in political and economic conditions, including the political and economic effects of the current economic downturn and other major developments, including the ongoing war on terrorism and potential adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market, and other capital markets (including changes in interest rate conditions);

· changes in deposit rates, the net interest margin, and funding sources;

· inflation, interest rate, market, and monetary fluctuations;

· risks inherent in making loans including repayment risks and value of collateral;

· the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations may be different than expected resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit, including the resultant effect on our loan portfolio and allowance for loan losses;

· changes in financial market conditions, either internationally, nationally or locally in areas in which the Company conducts its operations, including, without limitation, reduced rates of business formation and growth, commercial and residential real estate development, and fluctuations in consumer spending and saving habits;

· the demand for our products and services;

· technological changes;

· the challenges and uncertainties in the implementation of our expansion and development strategies;

· the ability to increase market share;

· the adequacy of expense projections and estimates of impairment loss;

· the impact of changes in accounting policies by the Securities and Exchange Commission;

· unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings;

Table of Contents

· future legislation affecting financial institutions and changes to governmental monetary and fiscal policies (including without limitation laws concerning taxes, banking, securities, and insurance);

· the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;

· the timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative delivery channels such as the Internet;

· other factors described in this report and in other reports we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and

· Our success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Executive Summary and Recent Developments

The Company’s total assets at ~~June~~ September 30, 2010, were approximately $~~911~~852.6 million, which represented a decrease of approximately $3695.8 million, or 310.8810%, from December 31, 2009. ~~Net~~A net loss of $59.73 million, $12.35 22 per diluted share, was recorded for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010 compared to a net loss of $2331.03 million, or $57.4744 per diluted share, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2009.

On September 11, 2009, the Bank consented to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist by the FDIC and the GDBF. Under the terms of the Order, the Bank cannot declare dividends without the prior written approval of the FDIC and the GDBF. Other material provisions of the Order require the Bank to: (i) strengthen its board of directors’ oversight of management and operations of the Bank, (ii) establish a committee consisting of at least four members, three of which must be independent, to oversee the Bank’s compliance with the Order, (iii) maintain specified liquidity ratios, (iv) improve the Bank’s lending and collection policies and procedures, particularly with respect to the origination and monitoring of commercial real estate and acquisition, development and construction loans, (v) eliminate from its books, by charge off or collection, all assets classified as “loss” and 50% of all assets classified as doubtful, (vi) perform risk segmentation analysis with respect to concentrations of credit, (vii) receive a brokered deposit waiver from the FDIC prior to accepting, rolling over or renewing any brokered deposits and submit a written plan for eliminating its reliance on brokered deposits, (viii) adopt and implement a policy limiting the use of loan interest reserves, (ix) formulate and fully implement a written plan and comprehensive budget for all categories of income and expense, and (x) prepare and submit progress reports to the FDIC and the GDBF. In addition, pursuant to the Order, the Bank is required to maintain Tier 1 capital equal to at least 8% of the Bank’s total assets and total risk-based capital equal to at least 10% of the Bank’s risk-weighted assets. The FDIC order will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the FDIC and the GDBF.

On March 26, 2010, the Company entered into a written agreement with the ~~Federal~~ Federal Reserve Board and the GDBF, pursuant to which the Company will be ~~prohibited~~ prohibited from declaring or paying dividends without prior written consent from the regulators. In addition, pursuant to the Agreement, without the prior written consent of regulators, the Company is prohibited from taking dividends, or any other form of payment representing a reduction of capital, from the Bank; paying interest, principal or other sums on subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities; incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt; redeeming any shares of the Company’s common stock; and increasing salaries or bonuses paid to executive officers. All salaries, bonuses and fees, excluding the reimbursement of expenses valued at less than $500 in the aggregate per month per executive officer, must be preapproved by the Board of Directors on a regular basis. In appointing any new director or any executive officer, the Company is required to notify ~~regulator~~regulatory authorities and comply with restrictions on ~~indemnification~~ indemnification and severance. The Company will also provide quarterly written progress reports to the Federal Reserve Board.

As required by the Agreement, the Company provided the Federal Reserve Board with a written plan designed to maintain sufficient capital at the Company, on a consolidated basis, and at the Bank. Although the Agreement did not contain specific target capital ratios or specific timelines the plan addressed the Company’s current and future

Table of Contents

capital requirements, the Bank’s current and future capital requirements, the adequacy of the Bank’s capital taking into account its risk profile, and the source and timing of additional funds necessary to fulfill the Company’s and the Bank’s future capital requirements, as required by the Agreement.

On March 26, 2010, the Bank received Notification of Prompt Corrective Action (the “Notice”), which, pursuant to Section 325.102 of the FDIC Rules and Regulations, requires the Bank to submit a capital restoration plan within 45 days of receipt of the Notice. InBecause ~~addition, because~~ the Bank is currently classified as “significantly undercapitalized”, in addition to the requirements in the Order, the Bank is required to adhere to the following restrictions, pursuant to which regulators may

· Require sale of securities, or, if grounds for conservatorship or receivership exist, direct the Bank to merge or be acquired;

· Restrict affiliate transactions;

· Restrict or prohibit all activities that are determined to pose an excessive risk to the Bank;

· Require the institution to elect new directors, dismiss directors or senior executive officers, or employ senior executive officers to improve management;

· Prohibit the acceptance of deposits from correspondent banks;

· Require holding company divestiture of the financial institution, bank divestiture of subsidiaries and/or holding company divestiture of other affiliates; or

· Require the bank to take any other action the federal regulator determines will “better achieve” prompt correction action.

In addition, without prior regulatory approval, the Bank is required to restrict the compensation paid to its senior executive officers.

On February 17, 2010, Michael C. Griffin submitted his resignation as a director of the Company and of the Bank, effective immediately. On April 14, 2010, Raymond O. Ballard, Jr. and J. Russell Lipford, Jr. submitted their resignations as a director of the Company and of the Bank effectively immediately. Messrs. Griffin, Ballard and Lipford have advised the Company that their resignations were not due to any disagreement with the Company.

On April 30, 2010, Gary P. Hall retired as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Company and of the Bank. He has agreed to continue to serve the Company and the Bank in a consulting capacity. Mr. Hall has advised the Company that his retirement was not due to any disagreement with the Company.

On June 11, 2010, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to increase the total number of shares of authorized common stock from 10 million shares to 110 million shares. The amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation was approved by the board of directors on March 18, 2010 and by shareholders of the Company at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 8, 2010.

On June 17, 2010, the Company appointed J. Randall Griffin as Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Bank. The FDIC approved Mr. Griffin’s appointment on May 21, 2010. In his role as Chief Credit Officer, he will maintain and develop all lending operations, manage the Special Assets Division and credit function and develop loan policies and procedures to ensure the overall quality of the Bank’s lending portfolio.

Table of Contents

Financial Condition

The composition of assets and liabilities for the Company is as follows:

	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets:
Total cash and cash equivalents	$	83104,~~662~~811		$	33,392		$	5071,~~270~~420		~~150~~213.5588	%
Securities available for sale	7240,~~335~~722			126,940			(5486,~~605~~218		)	-4367.0292	%
Loans, net of unearned income	~~663~~607,~~782~~723			718,307			(54110,~~525~~584		)	-715.5940	%
Cash surrender value of life insurance	13,~~276~~409			13,011			~~265~~398			23.0406	%
Intangible assets, net of amortization	2,~~368~~277			2,549			(~~181~~272		)	-7.10.67	%
Other real estate owned	4161,~~721~~612			21,066			2040,~~655~~546			98192.0547	%
Total assets	~~911~~852,~~587~~581			948,380			(3695,~~793~~799		)	-310.8810	%
Liabilities:
Deposits	~~835~~786,~~108~~303			861,157			(2674,~~049~~854		)	-38.0269	%
FHLB advances	3429,000			39,000			(510,000		)	-1225.8264	%
Subordinated debentures	1,400			1,400			—			—
Junior subordinated debentures	10,310			10,310			—			—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	21,~~560~~941			1,896			~~664~~45			352.0237	%
Total liabilities	~~887~~832,~~420~~421			918,741			(3186,~~321~~320		)	-39.4140	%
Loan to Deposit Ratio	7977.4829		%	83.41		%

Significant changes in the composition of assets include the increase in total cash and cash equivalents of $5071.34 million which was primarily due to the ~~maturities~~sales, maturities, calls and paydowns of securities of $5793.17 million and to the payoffs of loans from customers of approximately $2456.32 million. ~~This~~ The increase in total cash and cash equivalents was reduced by the payout of $2674.09 million of deposits, mostly maturing wholesale time deposits, and by the $510.0 million pay off of a maturing Federal Home Loan Bank ~~advance~~ advances. The Company invested approximately $27.5 million in securities ~~during~~as ~~the second quarter~~ of September 30, 2010.

Other significant changes in the composition of assets were the decrease in loans followed by the increase in other real estate owned during the first ~~six months~~nine months of 2010. The Company had ~~approximately~~ approximately $58.78 million in loans charged off during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010 along with approximately $2547.15 million moving to other real estate owned and to other assets.

The most significant change in the composition of liabilities was the decrease in deposits, which decreased approximately $2674.08 million. Savings accounts ~~had~~and anon-interest ~~small~~bearing deposits had an increase of approximately $~~253~~4.2 ~~thousand~~million while ~~non-interest bearing deposits,~~ money market ~~and~~ and NOW accounts and time deposits decreased $2679.30 million. Time deposits, including wholesale and core deposits, are our principal source of funds for loans and investing in securities. Local retail time deposits at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, increased approximately $2317.24 million since December 31, 2009 due to management’s efforts to increase core deposits and to continue reducing the Bank’s reliance on brokered deposits. The Company was able to decrease brokered deposits at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 by approximately $3071.1 million compared to December 31, 2009 primarily due to its ability to replace them with retail deposits obtained both locally and through a national rate-listing service.

Due to our strong loan demand in the past, we chose to obtain a portion of our deposits from outside of our market. The deposits obtained outside of our market area generally have lower rates than rates being offered for certificates of deposits in our local market. We have also utilized out-of-market deposits in certain instances to obtain longer term deposits than are readily available in our local market. Our brokered time deposits ~~represented~~ 24represented 21.6800% of our deposits as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 when compared to 27.43% of our deposits as of December 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

In the past, the Bank has relied heavily on brokered deposits. Pursuant to the Order and FDIC regulations, as a result of our significantly-undercapitalized status, we are unable to accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits absent a waiver from the FDIC. Accordingly, management has instituted an aggressive retail deposit marketing campaign both locally and through a national rate-listing service to replace the brokered deposits as they mature.

Investment Securities

Securities in our portfolio totaled $7240.37 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, compared to $126.9 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease in the securities portfolio has resulted from the ~~calls~~sales of approximately $1611.13 million in U.S. government sponsored enterprises and mortgage-backed ~~state~~securities, the calls of approximately $18.6 million in U.S. government sponsored enterprises and state, county and municipal bonds, the maturity of $3657.50 million in U.S. Treasury securities and the paydowns of approximately $46.57 million in mortgage-backed securities. The Company purchased approximately $27.5 million in mortgage-backed securities during the ~~second quarter~~first nine months of 2010. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the securities portfolio had unrealized net gains of approximately $1637 thousand.~~2 million.~~

The following table shows the carrying value of the investment securities at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Securities available for sale:
U. S. Treasury securities	$	20,523	$	57,157
U. S. Treasury Securities	$	—	$	57,157
U. S. Government sponsored enterprises	11,478		27,617
U. S. Government Sponsored Enterprises	5,104		27,617
State and political subdivisions	15,~~337~~331		15,156
Mortgage-backed securities	24,725		26,711
Mortgage-backed Securities	20,053		26,711
Other Investments	~~272~~234		299
Total	$	7240,~~335~~722	$	126,940

The following table summarizes securities disposal activities for the three and ~~six~~ nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended						~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)						(Dollars in Thousands)
Proceeds from sales	$	—11,347		$	~~37,034~~—		$	—11,347		$	5051,~~772~~612
Proceeds from calls	132,545			25,~~340~~040			1618,~~090~~635			25,~~520~~220
Proceeds from maturities	2220,500			2527,~~490~~347			3657,~~500~~000			2756,~~240~~080
Paydowns	2,~~027~~208			41,~~622~~329			46,~~526~~734			89,~~238~~568
Total	$	3836,~~072~~600		$	6933,~~486~~716		$	5793,~~116~~716		$	88122,~~770~~480
Gross gains	$	43557		$	~~1,153~~16		$	43600		$	1,~~384~~400
Gross losses	—(1		)	—(1		)	—(1		)	(11		)
Impairment losses	—			~~(58~~—		)	—			(58		)
Net gains of securities	$	43556		$	~~1,095~~15		$	43599		$	1,~~315~~331
Income tax expense	$	—		$	~~372~~5		$	—		$	~~447~~472

Table of Contents

Loans

Total loans, net of unearned income decreased approximately $54110.56 million, or 7 15.5940%, at ~~June~~September 30, 2010, from December 31, 2009 as management has made an effort to limit loan growth in order to preserve capital for the Company. Also, total loans have decreased due to approximately $58.78 million in loans being charged off and approximately $2547.15 million in loans being transferred to other real ~~estate~~ estate owned and other assets during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2010. Management is limiting credit availability especially for commercial real estate and acquisition, development and ~~construction~~ construction loans and pursuing collection efforts aggressively in an effort to reduce the Bank’s exposure to commercial real estate and acquisition, development and construction, pursuant to the Order. The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio by category.

	June 30,			December 31,
	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(Amounts in Thousands)
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial	$	4344,~~644~~788		$	51,674
Real estate - commercial	~~311~~273,~~001~~746			304,468
Real estate - construction	~~204~~190,~~328~~463			263,271
Real estate - mortgage	9893,~~809~~155			92,013
Obligations of political subdivisions in the U.S.	~~254~~205			295
Consumer	5,~~912~~488			6,838
Total loans	663,948			718,559
Total Loans	607,845			718,559
Less:
Unearned loan fees	(~~166~~122		)	(252		)
Allowance for loan losses	(1918,~~323~~653		)	(21,479		)
Loans, net	$	~~644~~589,~~459~~070		$	696,828

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company had ~~twenty-two~~seventeen loans with outstanding ~~balances~~ balances totaling $6556.3 million with loan-funded interest reserves. The amount of capitalized interest from interest reserves for 2010 was $~~937~~917 thousand.

Pursuant to the Order, the Bank adopted and implemented a policy limiting the use of loan interest reserves. This policy confines the use of interest reserves to properly underwritten construction and development loans ~~where~~for which development or building plans have specific ~~timetables~~ timetables that commence within a reasonable time of the loan’s approval and that include realistic timetables.

With respect to accounting for interest reserves on loans, interest that has been added to the balance of a loan through the use of an interest reserve should not be recognized as income if its collectability is not reasonably assured. The accrual of uncollected interest and its capitalization into the loan balance will not be appropriate when the loan becomes troubled and the full collection of contractual principal and interest is no longer expected.

When it is determined that the collectability of a loan with an interest reserve component is not reasonably assured, the loan is placed on non-accruing status and any unpaid accrued interest is reversed.

The decision to establish a loan funded interest reserve upon origination of an acquisition, development or construction loan is determined based on the feasibility of the project, the creditworthiness of the borrower and guarantors, and the protection provided by the real estate and other collateral. The total cost of the project, including the interest reserve, is considered when determining the equity injection required from the borrower.

Interest reserves are required on all construction and development loans unless it is clearly established that the borrower has the capacity to pay the interest during the initial stages of the development from alternative resources on the proposed contractual basis of payment. The reserve is included in the construction budget. Interest is collected from the interest reserve on a monthly basis. The interest is capitalized and added to the loan balance.

No restructured loans include an interest reserve component.

Table of Contents

Asset Quality

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, gross loans were 7271.83% of of total assets. Management considers ~~asset~~ asset quality to be of primary importance. Management has a credit administration and loan review process, which monitors, controls and measures our credit risk, standardized credit analyses and our comprehensive credit policy. Our level of nonperforming assets has remained at a high level since 2009 as a result of a slowing economy and the devaluation of real estate. Our non-performing assets have continued to increase since the beginning of the economic downturn in 2007, when management began to aggressively recognize impaired loans based on an ongoing process of identifying early signs of stress in our loan portfolio. Any significant events that may occur subsequent to any financial statement date are reviewed by management to determine if any impact is material to the financial statements. If the event is deemed to be material, the financial statements are adjusted to reflect the impact of the event.

The following table presents a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three and ~~six~~nine month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009.

Analysis of Changes in Allowance for Loan Losses

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance beginning of period	$	2119,~~148~~323		$	1114,~~493~~911		$	21,479		$	11,672
Loans charged-off	(43,~~030~~089		)	(211,~~317~~798		)	(58,~~721~~810		)	(214,~~911~~709		)
Recoveries	~~171~~241			17138			~~229~~470			82220
Net charge-offs	(32,~~859~~848		)	(211,~~300~~660		)	(58,~~492~~340		)	(214,~~829~~489		)
Provision for loan losses	2,~~034~~178			511,~~718~~352			35,~~336~~514			617,~~068~~420
Balance end of period	$	1918,~~323~~653		$	14,~~911~~603		$	1918,~~323~~653		$	14,~~911~~603
Loans, net of unearned income:
Total Loans:
At period end	$	~~663~~607,~~782~~723		$	~~790~~760,~~130~~500		$	~~663~~607,~~782~~723		$	~~790~~760,~~130~~500
Average	~~684~~640,~~930~~979			~~791~~782,~~354~~622			~~697~~678,~~908~~932			~~793~~789,~~493~~869
As a percentage of average loans (annualized):
Net charge-offs	21.2678		%	15.1691		%	1.5964		%	02.7145		%
Provision for loan losses	1.1936		%	25.8980		%	01.9608		%	12.5395		%
Allowance as a percentage of period end loans	23.9107		%	1.8992		%	23.9107		%	1.8992		%
Allowance as a percentage of non-performing loans	1721.8406		%	2320.2189		%	1721.8406		%	2320.2189		%

The loan portfolio is reviewed periodically to evaluate outstanding loans and to measure the performance of the portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 is adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. This analysis includes a review of delinquency trends, actual losses, and internal credit ratings. Management’s judgment as to the adequacy of the allowance is based upon a number of assumptions about future events which it believes to be reasonable. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific impaired loans, economic conditions and other risks inherent in the portfolio. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value of estimated cash flows. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, reductions in the carrying amounts of loans may be necessary based on changes in local economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the estimated losses on loans. Such agencies may require us to recognize losses based on their judgments about information ~~available~~ available to them at the time of their ~~examination. Because of these factors, it is reasonably possible that the estimated losses on loans may change materially in the near term. However, the amount of the change cannot be estimated.~~

Table of Contents

examination. Because of these factors, it is reasonably possible that the estimated losses on loans may change materially in the near term. However, the amount of the change cannot be estimated.

The allowance is composed of general allocations and specific allocations. General allocations are determined by applying loss percentages to the portfolio that are based on historical loss experience and management’s evaluation and “risk grading” of the commercial loan portfolio. Additionally, the general economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, the findings of internal credit reviews and results from external bank regulatory examinations are included in this evaluation. The need for specific allocations is evaluated on commercial loans that are classified in the Watch, Substandard or Doubtful risk grades, when necessary. The specific allocations are determined on a loan-by-loan basis based on management’s evaluation of the Company’s exposure for each credit, given the current payment status of the loan and the value of any underlying collateral. Loans for which specific allocations are provided are excluded from the calculation of general allocations.

Management prepares a monthly analysis of the allowance for loan losses and material deficiencies are adjusted by increasing the provision for loan losses. Management uses an outsourced independent loan review company on a quarterly basis to corroborate and challenge the internal loan grading system and provide additional analysis in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management rotates the loan review company on a periodic basis to ensure objectivity in the loan review process. In addition, an internal loan review process is conducted by a committee comprised of members of senior management. All new loans are risk rated under loan policy guidelines. The internal loan review committee meets quarterly to evaluate the composite risk ratings. Risk ratings may be changed if it appears that new loans were not assigned the proper initial grade, or, if on existing loans, credit conditions have improved or worsened.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment history and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogenous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, we do not separately identify individual consumer loans for impairment disclosures.

The Company’s allowance as a percentage of nonperforming loans has ~~decreased~~increased when comparing the three months and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 to the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. ~~This~~While isthe ~~due~~nonperforming loans have ~~mostly~~increased when comparing the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the ~~increase~~same period in ~~nonperforming~~the ~~loans~~prior ~~which~~year, the Company has ~~recorded~~been atable to ~~the~~maintain ~~lower~~a ofhigher ~~the~~allowance ~~stated~~for ~~value~~loan ofloss ~~the~~and ~~loan~~have orbeen ~~the~~able ~~fair~~to ~~value~~have offewer partial charge-offs on the ~~underlying collateral~~nonperforming loans. The Company recorded most of the nonperforming loans at the fair value of the underlying collateral, which significantly increased charge-offs during 2009 followed by an increase to the provision for loan losses, based upon management’s analysis of the allowance for loan losses. When comparing the Company’s allowance as a percentage of nonperforming loans from December 31, 2009 to ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the percentage ~~decreased~~increased from 18.53% at December 31, 2009 to 1721.8406% at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 due to ~~partially~~a ~~charging~~decrease ~~off~~in nonperforming loans toat ~~the~~September 30, ~~fair value of the underlying collateral during the first six months of~~ 2010.

Nonperforming assets consist of non-accrual loans, accruing loans 90 days past due, repossessed assets and other real estate owned. The following summarizes non-performing assets:

Table of Contents

	June 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Accruing loans 90 days past due	$	—	$	645
Non-accrual loans	108,325		115,294
Repossessed assets	11		1
Other real estate owned	41,720		21,066
Total non-performing assets	$	150,056	$	137,006

Nonperforming assets consist of non-accrual loans, accruing loans 90 days past due, repossessed assets and other real estate owned. The following summarizes non-performing assets:

Nonperforming assets increased $13.1 million, or 9.53%, from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010. Non-accrual loans decreased approximately $7.0 million from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010, largely due to approximately $25.1 million moving to other real estate owned and other assets, $5.7 million in partial charge-offs on non-accrual loans and approximately $4.6 million in pay downs. During the first six months of 2010, there was approximately $28.4 million in loans moved to non-accrual. All non-accrual loans are adequately collateralized based on management’s judgment and supported by recent collateral appraisals. Other real estate owned increased $20.7 million from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010. This increase is largely due to the addition of $24.3 million in foreclosed properties and $419 thousand in capitalized improvements on several foreclosed properties being offset by the sale of $3.6 million in foreclosed properties resulting in a loss of $51 thousand on these properties. The Company has written down $350 thousand for several foreclosed properties based upon updated appraisals.

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Accruing loans 90 days past due	$	—	$	645
Non-accrual loans	88,561		115,294
Repossessed assets	5		1
Other real estate owned	61,612		21,066
Total non-performing assets	$	150,178	$	137,006

~~The~~Nonperforming ~~Company~~assets ~~had~~increased $1213.32 million, ~~and~~or ~~$12~~9.861%, ~~million~~from inDecember 31, ~~loans~~2009 ~~that~~to ~~would~~September 30, 2010. Non-accrual beloans ~~defined as~~decreased ~~trouble~~approximately ~~debt~~$26.7 ~~restructurings~~million ~~(“TDR”)~~from ~~at June~~December 3031, ~~2010~~2009 ~~and~~to ~~at December~~September 3130, ~~2009~~2010, ~~respectively~~largely due to approximately $47. Of5 ~~those~~million ~~amounts,~~moving to other real estate owned and other assets, $108.56 million in partial charge-offs on non-accrual loans and approximately $18.6 million ~~were~~in ~~accruing~~pay asdowns. During ofthe ~~June 30,~~first ~~2010~~nine ~~and~~months ~~December 31, 2009,~~of ~~respectively~~2010, asthere was ~~they~~approximately ~~were~~$38.0 ~~performing~~million in ~~accordance~~loans ~~with~~moved ~~their~~to non-accrual. All non-accrual loans are adequately ~~restructured~~collateralized ~~terms~~based on management’s judgment and supported by recent collateral appraisals. AtOther ~~June~~real estate owned increased $40.5 million from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010,. This ~~there~~increase ~~were~~is ~~approximately~~largely due to the addition of $~~989~~46.7 million in foreclosed properties and $839 thousand in capitalized ~~TDR~~improvements ~~loans~~on ~~that~~several ~~had~~foreclosed aproperties ~~related~~being offset by the ~~allowance~~sale of ~~approximately~~ $~~357~~5.3 million in foreclosed properties resulting in a loss of $225 thousand on these properties. The AtCompany ~~December 31,~~has ~~2009,~~written ~~there~~down ~~were~~$1.5 nomillion ~~TDR~~for ~~loans~~several ~~that~~foreclosed ~~had~~properties ~~a related~~based ~~allowance~~upon updated appraisals.

The Company had $16.0 million and $12.8 million in loans that would be defined as trouble debt restructurings (“TDR”) at September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, respectively. Of those amounts, $13.5 million and $1.6 million were accruing as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, as they were performing in accordance with their restructured terms. At September 30, 2010, there were approximately $2.0 million in TDR loans that had a related allowance of approximately $501 thousand. At December 31, 2009, there were no TDR loans that had a related allowance.

Our policy is to place loans on non-accrual status when it appears that the collection of principal and interest in accordance with the terms of the loan is doubtful. Any loan which becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest is automatically placed on non-accrual. Exceptions are allowed for 90-day past due loans when such loans are well secured and in process of collection.

Our loan officers usually notify management first when they determine that a loan relationship may be showing signs of distress or issues with collectability of scheduled payments. Also, management is constantly reviewing and discussing past due loans with loan officers in efforts to identify further troubled loan relationships as soon as possible. Quarterly rated loan reviews are ~~held~~conducted by management to further monitor troubled loan relationships and potential loss exposure. Also, all loan relationships greater than $500 thousand are reviewed annually in the Officers’ Annual Review Committee. Loan officers are required to either validate the appraised values of collateral or order new appraisals when it is determined that a material change in the value of the property may have occurred.

~~For~~At ~~loans~~the ~~secured~~time bya ~~real estate~~loan ~~being~~is placed on non-accrual, an impairment analysis is performed. If a current appraisal is not on file, a new appraisal for the collateral is obtained by an independent, third-party appraiser within thirty days of engagement. Once the new appraisal has been reviewed and accepted by the senior vice president of credit administration, the impairment calculation is completed to determine the net realizable value of the loan with the appraised value being adjusted for certain costs including, but not limited to, sales commissions, closing costs, costs to complete or make ready for sale, property taxes, and, if necessary, an additional adjustment for market conditions. If the loan ~~balance~~is ~~has been~~ determined to be ~~in excess of the net realizable value from the impairment calculation, the loan is considered to~~ be ~~impaired. If the loan is determined to be~~ collateral dependent, the loan balance in excess of the net realizable value is charged off immediately. Generally, the underlying collateral securing collateral-dependent nonperforming loans consists of residential lots, residential dwellings, undeveloped land tracts, timber tracts and developed land tracts. If the loan is not determined to be collateral dependent, a specific allocation within the allowance for loan loss is provided for the loan once the impairment calculation is complete. Once management determines that the loan is impaired and placed on non-accrual, the loan is transferred to our Special Assets Division for close monitoring and collection.

Table of Contents

There are no commitments to lend additional funds to customers with loans on non-accrual status at ~~June~~September 30, 2010. Moreover, pursuant to the Order, the Bank is prohibited from extending new credit to anyone who has caused a loss to the Bank.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company’s other real estate owned consisted of the following:

	As of June 30, 2010			As of December 31, 2009
	As of September 30, 2010			As of December 31, 2009
	Number of Properties	Carrying Amount		Number of Properties	Carrying Amount
	(Dollars in Thousands)
1-4 Family residential properties	2325	$	2,~~314~~732	23	~~2,958~~$	2,958
Multifamily residential properties	24	113,~~675~~720		2	238
Nonfarm nonresidential properties	1418	913,~~739~~514		13	8,994
Farmland properties	23	~~950~~1,252		—	—
Construction & land development properties	5152	2730,~~042~~394		35	8,876
Total	92102	$	4161,~~720~~612	73	~~21,066~~$	21,066

All properties are being actively marketed for sale and management is continuously monitoring these properties in order to minimize any losses.

During July 2010, the Bank has foreclosed on approximately $3.8 million in various construction and land development, commercial and 1-4 family residential real estate properties. These properties were being held as collateral against several non-accrual loans at June 30, 2010. Management is currently evaluating these properties for any additional losses based on recently ordered appraisals.

The Company’s other real estate owned policy and procedures provide that a foreclosure appraisal be obtained. The policy requires a certified appraiser conduct the appraisal for foreclosed property to obtain a fair market value. To qualify and be approved as an appraiser for the Bank, appraisers must have met the Appraisal Qualifications Board requirements and have not had any disciplinary actions. Additionally, an appraiser must submit to the Bank their resume, license, education and experience for review before being approved for appraisal work. Upon transfer into other real estate owned, the property is listed with a realtor to begin sales efforts.

All other real estate owned properties are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated cost to sell. If the fair value less estimated costs to sell at the time of foreclosure is less than the loan balance, the deficiency is charged against the allowance for loan losses. An updated appraisal is ordered on each anniversary if the property is owned for more than one year. If the fair value of the other real estate owned, less estimated costs to sell at the time of foreclosure, decreases during the holding period, the other real estate owned is written down with a charge to noninterest expense. When the other real estate owned is sold, a gain or loss is recognized on the sale for the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the other real estate owned.

Deposits

Total deposits at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 were $~~835~~786.13 million, a decrease of $2674.09 million, or 38.0269%, from December 31, 2009. Total interest bearing demand (money market and NOW accounts), non-interest bearing demand accounts and savings accounts of $~~175~~174.90 million decreased $1921.21 million, or 910.82% from December 31, 2009 resulting mainly from several customers moving their deposits to our competitors, who have had more competitive rates during the first ~~six~~nine months of of 2010.

Total time deposits as of ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~ 2010 were $~~659~~612.23 million, a decrease of $653.97 million, or 18.0307%, from December 31, 2009. Total retail time deposits at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 increased approximately $2317.24 million, or 32.4984% of total time deposits, from December 31, 2009 due to managements’ efforts to increase core deposits with internet CDs and to continue reducing the Bank’s reliance on brokered deposits. Pursuant to the Order and FDIC regulations, as a result of our significantly-undercapitalized status, the Bank is prohibited from accepting, renewing or rolling over brokered deposits absent a waiver from the FDIC. The weighted average rates paid for retail time deposits for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was 2.3315% and 2.4334%, respectively, compared to 3.2900% and 3.4527% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Total brokered deposits at September 30, 2010 decreased approximately $71.1 million, or 11.61% of total time deposits, from December 31, 2009, resulting mainly from our ability to replace brokered deposits with retail deposits during the first nine months of 2010. The weighted average rates paid for brokered deposits for the three and nine months ended September 30,

Table of Contents

~~three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Total brokered deposits at June 30,~~ 2010 decreased approximately $30.1 million, or 4.57% of total time deposits, from December 31, 2009, resulting mainly from our ability to replace brokered deposits with retail deposits during the first six months of 2010. The weighted average rates paid for brokered deposits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were 3.5988% and 3.5866%, respectively, compared to 3.5541% and 3.6759% for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively. Because we are currently classified as less than well capitalized, we are prohibited from paying rates in excess of 75 basis points above the local market average on deposits of comparable maturity in our Georgia markets. In our Jacksonville market, however, we are prohibited from paying in excess of 75 basis points above the national average on deposits, as calculated by the FDIC.

Results of Operations

General

The Company’s results of operations are determined by its ability to effectively manage interest income and expense, to minimize loan and investment losses, to generate noninterest income and to control noninterest expense. Since interest rates are determined by market forces and economic conditions beyond the control of the Company, the ability to generate interest income is dependent upon the Bank’s ability to obtain an adequate spread between the rate earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

The following table shows the significant components of net loss:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2010			2009			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest and Dividend Income	$	1827,~~730~~323		$	2435,~~249~~504		$	(58,~~519~~181	)	-2223.7604	%
Interest Expense	1015,~~538~~191			1421,~~358~~580			(36,~~820~~389		)	-2629.61	%
Net Interest Income	812,~~192~~131			913,~~891~~923			(1,~~699~~792		)	-1712.1887	%
Provision for Loan Losses	35,~~336~~514			617,~~068~~420			(211,~~732~~906		)	-4568.0235	%
Noninterest Income	13,~~766~~167			34,~~343~~475			(1,~~577~~308		)	-4729.1723	%
Noninterest Expense	1219,~~293~~114			3239,~~549~~044			(2019,~~256~~930		)	-6251.2305	%
Net Loss	(59,~~671~~329		)	(2331,~~040~~328		)	1721,~~369~~999			7570.3922	%
Net Loss Per Diluted Share	(12.3522		)	(57.4744		)	45.1222			7570.3216	%

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2010			2009			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest and Dividend Income	$	8,~~949~~593		$	11,~~702~~255		$	(2,~~753~~662	)	-23.5365	%
Interest Expense	54,~~167~~654			7,~~208~~223			(2,~~041~~569		)	-2835.3257	%
Net Interest Income	3,~~782~~939			4,~~494~~032			(~~712~~93		)	-152.8431	%
Provision for Loan Losses	2,~~034~~178			511,~~718~~352			(39,~~684~~174		)	-6480.4381	%
Noninterest Income	~~897~~1,401			21,~~081~~132			~~(1,184~~269		)	~~-56~~23.9077	%
Noninterest Expense	6,~~683~~821			276,~~234~~495			~~(20,551~~326		)	~~-75~~5.4602	%
Net Loss	(43,~~038~~659		)	(238,~~782~~288		)	194,~~744~~629			8355.0286	%
Net Loss Per Diluted Share	(0.9687		)	(51.6597		)	41.6910			8355.0284	%

Net Interest Income

Our primary source of income is interest income from loans and investment securities. Our profitability depends largely on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest received on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits, borrowings, and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income decreased $1.78 million, or 12.87%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Net interest income decreased $93 thousand, or 2.31%, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009.

Table of Contents

~~million,~~Total orinterest ~~17.18%,~~and dividend income for the ~~six~~three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 decreased $2.7 million, or 23.65%, and $8.2 million, or 23.04%, respectively, when compared to the ~~six~~ three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. ~~Net~~This decrease is primarily due to ~~interest~~decrease ~~income~~in ~~decreased~~the ~~$712~~volume ~~thousand~~of loans due to payoffs from customers, an increase in the volume of nonperforming loans on non-accrual status and/or ~~15.84%,~~moving ~~for~~to other real estate owned and a decrease in interest on securities from the ~~three~~purchase ~~months~~of low-yielding ~~ended~~U.S. ~~June 30,~~government sponsored enterprises securities purchased during ~~2010~~the ~~compared~~second toquarter of 2009 when the ~~three~~Bank ~~months~~restructured ~~ended~~its ~~June 30,~~investment portfolio combined with the purchase of short-term U.S. treasury bills during 2009 which are being used to meet liquidity needs.

~~Total~~Average ~~interest~~loans and ~~dividend~~loans ~~income~~held for sale portfolios for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 decreased $2141.86 million, or 2318.5310%, and $5110.59 million, or 2214.7604%, respectively, when compared to average loans and loans held for sale portfolios for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. ~~This~~The ~~decrease~~average isyield ~~primarily~~on ~~due~~loans ~~to decrease~~decreased infor the three ~~volume~~and ofnine ~~loans~~months ~~due~~ended September 30, 2010 to ~~payoffs~~5.02% ~~from~~and ~~customers~~5.04%, respectively, ancompared ~~increase~~to ~~in the~~an ~~volume~~average yield of ~~nonperforming~~5.29% ~~loans~~and on5.51% ~~non-accrual~~for ~~status~~the three and~~/or~~ nine ~~moving~~months toended ~~other~~September 30, 2009. ~~real~~While ~~estate~~we ~~owned~~have ~~and~~experienced a decrease in ~~interest~~the onvolume ~~securities~~of ~~from~~loans, the ~~purchase of~~Company ~~low-yielding~~has ~~U.S.~~managed ~~government~~to ~~sponsored~~increase ~~enterprises securities purchased during~~ the ~~second~~average ~~quarter~~rate ofpaid ~~2009~~on ~~when~~ the ~~Bank~~remaining ~~restructured~~accruing ~~its investment portfolio~~loans ~~combined~~when ~~with~~comparing the ~~purchase~~three ofand ~~short-term~~nine ~~U.S.~~months ~~treasury~~ended ~~bills~~September 30, ~~during~~2010 ~~2009~~to ~~which~~the ~~are~~same ~~being~~periods ~~used~~in ~~to meet liquidity needs~~2009.

~~Average~~Total ~~loans~~interest ~~and~~expense ~~loans held~~ for ~~sale portfolios for~~ the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~ 2010 decreased $~~106~~2.46 million, or 1335.4557%, and $~~95.~~6.4 million, or 1229.0561%, respectively, when compared to ~~average~~the ~~loans~~three and ~~loans~~nine ~~held~~months ~~for~~ended ~~sale~~September 30, 2009. Two factors impact interest expense: average balances of deposit and borrowing portfolios and average rates paid on ~~for~~each. Average deposit balances decreased approximately $193.1 million and $88.9 million when comparing the three and nine ~~six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The average ~~yield~~rate paid on ~~loans~~the ~~decreased~~deposit portfolios for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 decreased to 42.8731% and 52.0142%, respectively, from 2.87% and 3.09% when compared to anthe ~~average~~three ~~yield~~and ofnine 5months ended September 30, 2009.43 Average borrowing balances decreased approximately $17.8 million and $16.1 million when comparing the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Average interest rates paid on borrowings were 3.19% and 52.5892% for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 3.27% and 3.24% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.

Total interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased $2.0 million, or 28.31%, and $3.8 million, or 26.61%, respectively, when compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Two factors impact interest expense: average balances of deposit and borrowing portfolios and average rates paid on each. Average deposit balances decreased approximately $70.8 million and $36.8 million when comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The average rate paid on the deposit portfolios for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased to 2.41% and 2.46%, respectively, from 3.07% and 3.18% when compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Average borrowing balances decreased approximately $19.7 million and $15.3 million when comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Average interest rates paid on borrowings were 2.87% and 2.76% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 3.15% and 3.19% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

The banking industry uses two key ratios to measure relative profitability of net interest income, which are net interest spread and net interest margin. The interest rate spread measures the difference between the average yield on earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The interest rate spread eliminates the impact of non-interest-bearing funding sources and gives a direct perspective on the effect of market interest rate movements. The net interest margin is an indication of the profitability of our investments, and is defined as net interest revenue as a percentage of total average earning assets which includes the positive impact of funding a portion of earning assets with customers’ non-interest-bearing deposits and with stockholders’ equity.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and 2009, our tax equivalent net interest spread was 12.8411% and 1.9339%, respectively, while the tax equivalent net interest margin was 12.8207% and 1.9456%, respectively. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2010~~ 2010 and 2009, our tax equivalent net interest spread was 12.9401% and 21.1286%, respectively, while the tax equivalent net interest margin was 12.9500% and 21.1997%, respectively. The ~~decreases~~increases in net interest spread and net interest margin from the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, were due to the decrease in the ~~loss of~~average ~~interest~~rates paid on ~~non~~interest-~~accrual~~bearing ~~loans~~deposits ~~and~~caused by the rate restrictions from being less than well capitalized. We are prohibited from paying rates in excess of 75 basis points above the ~~purchase~~local market average on deposits of ~~low-yielding~~comparable ~~investment~~maturity ~~securities~~in ~~during~~our ~~2009~~Georgia markets. In our Jacksonville market, however, we are prohibited from paying in excess of 75 basis points above the national average on deposits, as calculated by the FDIC.

Table of Contents

The following table shows the relationship between interest revenue and interest expense and the average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-~~earning~~bearing liabilities for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~and~~ and 2009.

Average Consolidated Balance Sheet and Net Interest Margin Analysis

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2010						2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)
	Average				Average		Average				Average
	Balance		Interest		Rate		Balance		Interest		Rate
Earning assets
Loans, net of unearned income (4) (5) (6)	$	~~684~~640,~~930~~979	$	8,~~333~~112	45.8702	%	$	~~791~~782,~~354~~622	$	10,~~730~~424	5.4329	%
Investment securities - taxable (7)	7642,~~025~~833		~~417~~289		2.1968	%	~~113~~144,~~981~~475		~~811~~615		21.8569	%
Investment securities - tax-exempt (6) (7)	13,~~990~~907		~~145~~140		6.2405	%	1514,~~247~~342		~~157~~147		6.2416	%
Other interest and dividend income	71,~~538~~717		5452		0.3129	%	22106,~~924~~522		469		0.0726	%
Total earning assets	~~846~~769,~~483~~436		8,~~949~~593		4.2747	%	~~943~~1,~~506~~047,961		11,~~702~~255		54.0029	%
Non-interest-earning assets
Allowance for loan losses	-2119,~~196~~190						-1215,~~071~~049
Cash and due from banks	107,~~272~~505						6512,~~226~~855
Premises and equipment	30,~~487~~201						31,~~822~~481
Accrued interest receivable	43,~~518~~863						65,~~023~~436
Other real estate owned	3548,~~017~~592						129,~~707~~316
Other assets	3022,~~146~~784						4222,~~747~~477
Total assets	$	~~935~~863,~~727~~191					$	1,~~089~~114,~~960~~477
Interest bearing liabilities
Interest bearing demand	$	~~116~~108,~~666~~482	$	~~213~~188	0.7369	%	$	~~150~~165,~~983~~538	$	~~605~~655	1.6057	%
Savings	9,~~248~~183		8		0.35	%	89,~~651~~456		811		0.3746	%
Time deposits	~~677~~618,~~634~~971		4,~~618~~095		2.7362	%	~~712~~751,~~828~~271		6,~~080~~039		3.4119	%
Total interest bearing deposits	~~803~~736,~~548~~636		4,~~839~~291		2.4131	%	~~872~~926,~~462~~265		6,~~693~~705		32.0787	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	3433,~~000~~390		~~224~~253		23.6401	%	5351,~~701~~139		~~388~~406		23.8915	%
Other borrowings	1,400		4243		12.0017	%	1,~~400~~483		4243		1211.0050	%
Trust Preferred Securities	10,310		62		2.41	%	10,310		85		3.30	%
Junior subordinated debentures	10,310		67		2.58	%	10,310		69		2.66	%
Total borrowed funds	45,~~710~~100		~~328~~363		23.8719	%	6562,~~411~~932		~~515~~518		3.1527	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	~~849~~781,~~258~~736		54,~~167~~654		2.4336	%	~~937~~989,~~873~~197		7,~~208~~223		32.0790	%
Non-interest bearing deposits	52,~~748~~503						5456,~~683~~016
Other liabilities	76,~~161~~253						75,~~926~~382
Shareholder’s equity	26,560						89,478
Shareholders’ equity	22,699						63,882
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	935,727					$	1,089,960
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	863,191					$	1,114,477
Net interest revenue (1)			$	3,~~782~~939					$	4,~~494~~032
Net interest spread (2)					12.8411	%					1.9339	%
Net interest margin (3) (6)					12.8207	%					1.9456	%

(1) Net interest revenue is computed by subtracting the expense from the average interest-bearing liabilities from the income from the average earning assets.

(2) Net interest spread is computed by subtracting the yield from the expense of the average interest-bearing liabilities from the yield from the average earning assets.

(3) Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest revenue by average total earning assets.

(4) Average loans are shown net of unearned income. Included in the average balance of loans outstanding are loans where the accrual of interest has been discounted.

(5) Interest income includes loan fees as follows (in thousands): 2010 - $~~220~~210; 2009 - $~~355~~276

(6) Average rate reflects taxable equivalent adjustments using a tax rate of 34 percent.

(7) Investment securities are stated at amortized or accreted cost.

Table of Contents

The following table shows the relationship between interest revenue and interest expense and the average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-~~earning~~bearing liabilities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~and~~ and 2009.

Average Consolidated Balance Sheet and Net Interest Margin Analysis

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010						2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
	(Dollar amounts in thousands)
	Average				Average		Average				Average
	Balance		Interest		Rate		Balance		Interest		Rate
Earning assets
Loans, net of unearned income (4) (5) (6)	$	~~697~~678,~~908~~932	$	1725,~~485~~597	5.0104	%	$	~~793~~789,~~493~~869	$	2232,~~131~~556	5.5851	%
Investment securities - taxable (7)	9074,~~485~~601		~~882~~1,171		12.9510	%	96112,~~956~~795		12,~~786~~400		32.6884	%
Investment securities - tax-exempt (6) (7)	1413,~~037~~994		~~290~~430		6.2622	%	15,~~938~~406		~~323~~470		6.1418	%
Other interest and dividend income	5258,~~587~~964		73125		0.28	%	1445,~~748~~340		977		0.1223	%
Total earning assets	~~855~~826,~~017~~491		1827,~~730~~323		4.4246	%	~~921~~963,~~135~~410		2435,~~249~~503		54.3096	%
Non-interest-earning assets
Allowance for loan losses	-2120,~~649~~800						-1112,~~903~~952
Cash and due from banks	98,~~657~~939						5138,~~503~~620
Premises and equipment	30,~~654~~503						31,~~678~~613
Accrued interest receivable	4,~~610~~361						65,~~137~~903
Other real estate owned	3036,~~601~~568						1110,~~603~~841
Other assets	3027,~~118~~674						4336,~~218~~305
Total assets	$	~~939~~913,~~008~~736					$	1,~~053~~073,~~371~~740
Interest bearing liabilities
Interest bearing demand	$	~~120~~116,~~480~~481	$	~~461~~650	0.7775	%	$	~~147~~153,~~249~~345	$	1,~~204~~859	1.6462	%
Savings	9,~~127~~146		1623		0.3534	%	8,~~384~~741		1526		0.3640	%
Time deposits	~~673~~655,~~851~~558		913,~~399~~494		2.7975	%	~~684~~706,~~710~~897		1218,~~129~~167		3.5444	%
Total interest bearing deposits	~~803~~781,~~458~~185		914,~~876~~167		2.4642	%	~~840~~868,~~343~~983		1320,~~348~~052		3.1809	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	3635,~~258~~302		~~457~~710		2.5269	%	51,~~518~~392		~~739~~1,145		2.8798	%
Other borrowings	1,400		84127		12.0013	%	1,~~422~~442		85128		11.9587	%
Trust Preferred Securities	10,310		121		2.35	%	10,310		186		3.61	%
Junior subordinated debentures	10,310		188		2.44	%	10,310		255		3.31	%
Total borrowed funds	47,~~968~~012		~~662~~1,025		2.7692	%	63,~~250~~144		1,~~010~~528		3.1924	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	~~851~~828,~~426~~197		1015,~~538~~192		2.4845	%	~~903~~932,~~593~~127		1421,~~358~~580		3.1810	%
Non-interest bearing deposits	52,504						5253,~~401~~606
Other liabilities	76,~~213~~892						76,~~730~~949
Shareholder’s equity	27,865						89,647
Shareholders’ equity	26,143						81,058
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	939,008					$	1,053,371
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	913,736					$	1,073,740
Net interest revenue (1)			$	812,~~192~~131					$	913,~~891~~923
Net interest spread (2)					12.9401	%					21.1286	%
Net interest margin (3) (6)					12.9500	%					21.1997	%

(1) Net interest revenue is computed by subtracting the expense from the average interest-bearing liabilities from the income from the average earning assets.

(2) Net interest spread is computed by subtracting the yield from the expense of the average interest-bearing liabilities from the yield from the average earning assets.

(3) Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest revenue by average total earning assets.

(4) Average loans are shown net of unearned income. Included in the average balance of loans outstanding are loans where the accrual of interest has been discounted.

(5) Interest income includes loan fees as follows (in thousands): 2010 - $~~497~~708; 2009 - $~~693~~969

(6) Average rate reflects taxable equivalent adjustments using a tax rate of 34 percent.

(7) Investment securities are stated at amortized or accreted cost.

Table of Contents

The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in interest income and interest expense due to changes in rate and volume for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

Change in Interest Revenue and Expense on a Taxable Equivalent Basis

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010									Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Three Months Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
	Compared to 2009									Compared to 2009
	2010 Compared to 2009									2010 Compared to 2009
	Changes due to (a)									Changes due to (a)
				Yield/			Net						Yield/			Net
	Volume			Rate			Change			Volume			Rate			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
	(Amounts in thousands)
Interest earned on:
Loans	$	(2,~~676~~643	)	$	~~279~~331		$	(2,~~397~~312	)	$	(57,~~184~~801	)	$	~~538~~842		$	(46,~~646~~959	)
Investment securities:
Taxable investment securities	(~~223~~370		)	~~(171~~44		)	(~~394~~326		)	(~~441~~832		)	(~~463~~397		)	(~~904~~1,229		)
Tax-exempt investment securities	(135		)	1(2		)	(127		)	(4547		)	127			(3340		)
Interest earning deposits	37(24		)	137			50(17		)	5327			1121			6448
Total interest income	(23,~~875~~042		)	~~122~~380			(2,~~753~~662		)	(58,~~617~~653		)	98473			(58,~~519~~180		)
Interest paid on:
Deposits:
Interest bearing demand deposits	(~~116~~174		)	(~~276~~293		)	(~~392~~467		)	(~~189~~370		)	(~~554~~839		)	(~~743~~1,209		)
Savings	1—			(13		)	—(3		)	21			(14		)	1(3		)
Time deposits	(~~651~~1,462		)	(~~811~~482		)	(1,~~462~~944		)	(~~892~~2,384		)	(12,~~838~~289		)	(24,~~730~~673		)
Other borrowings and FHLB advances	(~~134~~136		)	(3017		)	(~~164~~153		)	(~~201~~332		)	(82104		)	(~~283~~436		)
Trust Preferred Securities	—			(23		)	(23		)	—			(65		)	(65		)
Junior subordinated debentures	—			(2		)	(2		)	—			(67		)	(67		)
Total interest expense	(~~900~~1,772		)	(~~1,141~~797		)	(2,~~041~~569		)	(13,~~280~~085		)	(23,~~540~~303		)	(36,~~820~~388		)
Decrease in net interest revenue	$	(1,~~975~~270	)	$	1,~~263~~177		$	(~~712~~93	)	$	(45,~~337~~568	)	$	23,~~638~~776		$	(1,~~699~~792	)

(a) Volume and rate components are in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of the change in each.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $35.3 5 million compared to $617.14 million for the same period of 2009. The provision for loan losses for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010 was $2.02 million compared to $511.74 million for the same period of 2009. While there is an increase in nonperforming loans and a decrease in loan activity for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company decreased its provision for loan losses based on management’s analysis of the allowance for loan losses. Net charge-offs as an annualized percentage of average outstanding loans for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 were 21.2678% and 1.5964%, respectively, as compared with 15.1691% and 02.7145% for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, respectively. Net loan charge-offs ~~increased~~ ~~significantly~~decreased significantly during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, due mainly to the Company ~~continuing~~writing todown ~~charge-off~~$11.8 ~~nonperforming~~million ~~loan~~for ~~balances~~several toimpaired loans during the third quarter of 2009 to their net realizable value compared to $3.1 million in loans being written down during the third quarter of 2010.

The provision for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of inherent risks in the loan portfolio and the corresponding analysis of the allowance for loan losses. Additional discussion on loan quality and the allowance for loan losses are included in the Asset Quality section of this report.

Table of Contents

Non-interest Income

Composition of other noninterest income is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	~~792~~1,179	$	~~840~~1,304	$	(48125	)	-59.7159	%
Other service charges, commissions and fees	~~292~~443		~~238~~374		5469			2218.6945	%
Gain on sales / calls of investment securities	43		1,316		(1,273		)	-96.73	%
Gain on sales, calls and impairment write-down of investment securities	600		1,331		(731		)	-54.92	%
Mortgage origination income	~~150~~218		~~393~~643		(~~243~~425		)	-6166.8310	%
Other income	~~489~~727		~~556~~823		(6796		)	-1211.0566	%
Total noninterest income	$	13,~~766~~167	$	34,~~343~~475	$	(1,~~577~~308	)	-4729.1723	%

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	~~408~~387	$	~~418~~464	$	(1077	)	-216.3959	%
Other service charges, commissions and fees	~~159~~151		~~126~~136		3315			2611.1903	%
Gain on sales / calls of investment securities	43		1,095		(1,052		)	-96.07	%
Gain on sales, calls and impairment write-down of investment securities	557		15		542			3613.33	%
Mortgage origination income	5868		~~187~~249		(~~129~~181		)	-6872.9869	%
Other income	~~229~~238		~~255~~268		(2630		)	-1011.2019	%
Total noninterest income	$	~~897~~1,401	$	21,~~081~~132	$	~~(1,184~~269	)	~~-56~~23.9076	%

Non-interest income for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~decreased~~increased $~~1.2 million~~269 thousand, or 56 23.9076%, when compared to the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. Non-interest income for the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 decreased $1.63 million, or 4729.1723%, when compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. Service charges on deposit accounts are evaluated against service charges from other banks in our local markets and against the Bank’s own cost structure in providing the deposit services. This income correlates with the Bank’s demand deposit account base. During the first nine ~~six~~ months of 2010, the Bank experienced a decrease in the number of core transaction deposit accounts. Total service charges, including non-sufficient funds fees, decreased approximately $1077 thousand, or 216.4359%, and $47125 thousand, or 59.6559%, for the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2009.

The decrease in the gain on sales/calls of investment securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is primarily due to the Company recording $1.13 million in gains from the sales of several mortgage-backed securities during the ~~second~~first ~~quarter~~nine ofmonths of 2009 as compared to $43 600 thousand in gains from the calls of state, county and municipal bond and the sale of several U.S. government sponsored enterprises securities and mortgage—backed securities during the ~~second~~first nine months of ~~quarter~~2010. The increase in the gain on sales/calls of investment securities for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily due to the Company recording $557 thousand in gains from the sale of several U.S. government sponsored enterprises securities and mortgage-backed securities.

The decrease in mortgage origination income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 is primarily due to the decrease in the number of mortgage loan closings. Approximately 2318 mortgage loan closings occurred during the second quarter of 2010 compared to 74 mortgage loan closings for the same period in 2009. For the six months ended June 20, 2010, there were approximately 35 mortgage loan closings that occurred compared to 135 mortgage loan closings for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

The decrease in other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009 is due to the decrease in commission fees from our wealth management department.

Table of Contents

during the third quarter of 2010 compared to 70 mortgage loan closings for the same period in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were approximately 53 mortgage loan closings that occurred compared to 205 mortgage loan closings for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

The decrease in other income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009 is due to the decrease in commission fees from our wealth management department.

Non-interest Expense

Composition of other noninterest expense is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2010		2009			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	46,~~550~~597	$	57,~~415~~839		$	(~~865~~1,242	)	-15.9784	%
Occupancy expense	~~883~~1,326		~~892~~1,355			(929		)	-12.0115	%
Equipment rental and depreciation of equipment	~~595~~895		~~631~~965			(3670		)	-57.7125	%
Loss on sale of other assets	1		44			(43		)	-97.73	%
(Gain) loss on sale of other assets	6		(62		)	68			-109.68	%
Loss on sale and impairment of other real estate	~~397~~1,719		12,~~491~~432			(~~1,094~~713		)	-7329.3732	%
Other real estate expense	1,~~301~~779		~~336~~653			~~965~~1,126			~~287~~172.2043	%
FDIC and state banking assessments	23,~~328~~431		1,~~155~~884			1,~~173~~547			~~101~~82.5611	%
Goodwill impairment	—		19,~~533~~534			(19,~~533~~534		)	-100.00	%
Other expenses	23,~~238~~361		34,~~052~~444			(~~814~~1,083		)	-2624.6737	%
Total noninterest expense	$	1219,~~293~~114	$	3239,~~549~~044		$	(2019,~~256~~930	)	-6251.2304	%

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2010		2009			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	2,~~223~~046	$	2,~~639~~424		$	(~~416~~378	)	-15.7659	%
Occupancy expense	~~445~~443		~~437~~463			8(20		)	1-4.8332	%
Equipment rental and depreciation of equipment	~~298~~300		~~326~~333			(2833		)	-89.5991	%
Loss on sale of other assets	1		6			(5		)	-83.33	%
(Gain) loss on sale of other assets	5		(106		)	111			-104.72	%
Loss on sale and impairment of other real estate	~~295~~1,323		~~1,466~~942			~~(1,171~~381		)	~~-79~~40.8845	%
Other real estate expense	~~828~~477		~~211~~317			~~617~~160			~~292~~50.4247	%
FDIC and state banking assessments	1,~~417~~103		~~958~~729			~~459~~374			4751.9130	%
Goodwill impairment	—		~~19,533~~—			~~(19,533~~—		)	~~-100.00~~—	%
Other expenses	1,~~176~~124		1,~~658~~393			(~~482~~269		)	-2919.0731	%
Total noninterest expense	$	6,~~683~~821	$	276,~~234~~495		$	~~(20,551~~326	)	~~-75~~5.4602	%

Non-interest expense for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~decreased~~increased $~~20.6~~326 ~~million~~thousand, or 755.4602%, when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase is primarily due to the loss on the sale and impairment of other real estate properties which increased by $20381 thousand and from an increase of $374 thousand in quarterly FDIC assessments with an offset of a decrease of $378 thousand in salary and employee benefits with the Company eliminating its accrual on the 401k match for employees and from a reduction in staff.3 Non-interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased $19.9 million, or 6251.2304%, ~~respectively,~~ when compared to the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to the Company recording a $19.5 million charge for goodwill impairment during the ~~second~~ second quarter of 2009.

The decrease in the loss on the sale and impairment of other real estate owned for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 is attributed to the Company recording a loss on one particular foreclosed property totaling to $1.3 million during the second quarter of 2009. The increase in other real estate expenses is attributed to the number of other real estate properties that the Company owns. At June 30, 2010, the Company had a total of 92 properties compared to 37 properties at June 30, 2009.

The increase in the FDIC and state banking assessments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 is attributable to our risk classification with the FDIC. Since entering into the Order with the FDIC, the Company has had higher quarterly assessments due to our risk classification.

Table of Contents

The decrease in ~~salaries~~the loss on the sale and ~~employee~~impairment ~~benefits~~of ~~for~~other ~~the~~real ~~three~~estate ~~and~~owned ~~six~~for the nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 ~~compared~~is primarily attributed to the Company ~~same~~recording ~~period~~a inloss ~~2009~~on isone ~~primarily~~particular ~~due~~foreclosed property totaling to no$1.3 million ~~accrual~~during the second quarter of 2009. ~~bonuses,~~The aincrease ~~decrease~~ in the ~~expense~~loss ~~relating~~on to the ~~salary~~sale ~~continuation~~and ~~plan based~~impairment ~~upon~~of ~~changes~~other ~~with~~real estate owned for the ~~plan~~three months ended September 30, 2010 is attributed to the impairment ~~utilization~~of $1.1 million of aseveral ~~bank~~other ~~officer~~real ~~one~~estate ~~day~~owned ~~per~~properties based ~~quarter~~upon ~~furlough,~~updated ~~and~~appraisals. The aincrease ~~small~~in other ~~reduction~~real inestate ~~staff~~expenses is attributed to the number of other real estate properties that the Company owns. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the ~~number~~Company had a total of ~~full-time~~ ~~equivalent~~102 ~~employees~~other ~~was~~real ~~161~~estate ~~employees~~owned properties compared to ~~167~~54 ~~employees~~properties at ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

The increase in the FDIC and state banking assessments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 is attributable to our risk classification with the FDIC. Since entering into the Order with the FDIC, the Company has had higher quarterly assessments due to our risk classification.

The decrease in salaries and employee benefits for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily due to no accrual of bonuses, a decrease in the expense relating to the salary continuation plan based upon changes to the plan, the utilization of a bank officer one day per quarter furlough, the elimination of the accrual on the Company’s 401k match for their employees and a small reduction in staff. At September 30, 2010, the number of full-time equivalent employees was 158 employees compared to 165 employees at September 30, 2009.

The decreases in equipment rental and depreciation of equipment, occupancy expense and other expenses are not attributable to any one particular item, but represent the Company’s efforts to decrease controllable noninterest expense.

Income Tax Expense

The Company recorded a valuation allowance for the balance of the recorded deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2009; ~~however,~~and ~~an income tax benefit was not recognized~~ for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 since it is presently more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. With respect to the Company’s cumulative losses as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we have determined that it is more likely than not that any income tax benefit that would have been recorded would not be realized. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, income tax benefit of $24.64 million and $26.37 million was recognized with an effective tax rate of 934.8465% and 917.2370%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 was lower than the statutory tax rates primarily due to the tax-free income from certain investment securities and loans that are exempt from income taxes and tax credits received from affordable housing investments and the goodwill impairment charge. The majority of the goodwill from the two acquisitions in 2006 and 2007 was treated as tax-free exchanges, which was not recognized for tax reporting purposes and therefore no tax deduction was allowed for the impairment charge. Likewise, no tax benefit for the goodwill was recognized in the financial statements relating to the $19.5 million charge.

Liquidity

Liquidity management involves the matching of the cash flow requirements of customers, either depositors withdrawing funds or borrowers needing loans, and the ability of the Company to meet those requirements.

The Company’s liquidity program is designed and intended to provide guidance in funding the credit and investment activities of the Company, while at the same time ensuring that the deposit obligations of the Company are met on a timely basis. In order to permit active and timely management of assets and liabilities, these accounts are monitored regularly in regard to volume, mix and maturity.

The Company’s liquidity position depends primarily upon the liquidity of its assets relative to its need to respond to short-term demand for funds caused by withdrawals from deposit accounts and loan funding commitments. Primary sources of liquidity are scheduled repayments on the Company’s loans and interest on, and maturities of, its investment securities. Sales of investment securities available for sale represent another source of liquidity to the Company. The Company may also utilize its cash and due from banks and federal funds sold to meet liquidity requirements as needed.

The Company also has the ability, on a short-term basis, to purchase up to $11 million in federal funds from other financial institutions. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company had no federal funds purchased. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we do not have any further borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank with $34.0 million in outstanding advances. The Company has a total available line of $18.7 million, subject to available collateral, from the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). The Company had no advances on the FRB line at June 30, 2010.

The Bank’s liquidity policy requires that the ratio of cash and certain short-term investments to net withdrawable deposit accounts be at least 10%. The Bank’s liquidity ratios at June 30, 2010 and 2009 were 18.61% and 26.06%, respectively.

In the past, the Bank has relied heavily on brokered deposits. Pursuant to the Order and FDIC regulations as a result of our significantly-undercapitalized status, we are unable to accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits absent a waiver from the FDIC. Accordingly, management has instituted an aggressive retail deposit marketing campaign both locally and through a national rate-listing service to replace the brokered CDs as they mature. The increase in liquid assets is designed to provide cash to payoff the brokered deposits as they mature.

Table of Contents

we do not have any further borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank with $29.0 million in outstanding advances. The Company has a total available line of $21.9 million, subject to available collateral, from the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). The Company had no advances on the FRB line at September 30, 2010.

The Bank’s liquidity policy requires that the ratio of cash and certain short-term investments to net withdrawable deposit accounts be at least 10%. The Bank’s liquidity ratios at September 30, 2010 and 2009 were 17.94% and 25.94%, respectively.

Capital Resources

We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimal capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth below in the table) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and of Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined in the regulations). Pursuant to the Order, Tier 1 Capital must equal or exceed 8.00% of the Bank’s total assets and the Bank’s Total Risk-based Capital must equal or exceed 10.00% of the Bank’s total risk-weighted assets, within 90 days of the effective date of the Order. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Bank was not in in compliance with the Order, with Tier 1 capital to average assets at 3.2714% ~~and~~ and total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets at 5.8349%. As a result of our regulatory capital ratios, we are considered “significantly undercapitalized” by our bank regulatory authorities as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010. As As a result of our significantly-undercapitalized status, on March 26, 2010, the Bank received a Notification of Prompt Corrective Action, which ~~notified~~ notified the Bank that it is subject to greater regulatory monitoring and ~~certain~~ certain additional discretionary safeguards may be imposed by regulatory authorities, which may have a direct material effect on our financial statements.

Since the Bank consented to the Order, it has taken steps to address the provisions of the Order. Management has taken an active role in working with the FDIC and the GDBF to improve its financial condition and is addressing the terms of the Order on a continuing basis. We are also in the process of developing a short-term and a long-term capital plan to meet regulatory capital limits. Failure to adequately address the Order may result in more severe actions by regulators, including the eventual appointment of a receiver of the Bank’s asset.

Table of Contents

The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 follow:

										To Be Well Capitalized
					For Capital					Under Prompt Corrective
	Actual				Adequacy Purposes					Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount			Ratio		Amount				~~Ratio~~	Ratio
June 30, 2010
September 30, 2010
Total Risk-Based Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	4137,~~275~~396,000	5.9055	%	$	5553,~~966~~904,~~102~~144	>	8.0	%	N/A				~~N/A~~	N/A
Bank	4037,~~795~~018,000		5.8349	%	5553,~~979~~942,~~417~~441		>	8.0	%	~~69,974,271~~$	67,428,051	>	>	~~10.0~~	%10.0	%
Tier I Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	2824,~~788~~018,000	43.1156	%	$	2826,~~017~~986,~~518~~517	>	4.0	%	N/A				~~N/A~~	N/A
Bank	3027,~~522~~069,000		4.3602	%	2826,~~001~~934,~~835~~328		>	4.0	%	~~42,002,752~~$	40,401,493	>	>	~~6.0~~	%6.0	%
Tier I Capital To Average Assets
Consolidated	$	2824,~~788~~018,000	32.0879	%	$	3734,~~387~~434,~~013~~409	>	4.0	%	N/A				~~N/A~~	N/A
Bank	3027,~~522~~069,000		3.2714	%	3734,~~335~~482,~~780~~803		>	4.0	%	~~46,669,725~~$	43,103,503	>	>	~~5.0~~	%5.0	%
December 31, 2009
Total Risk-Based Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	47,485,000	6.28	%	$	60,490,446	>	8.0	%	N/A				~~N/A~~	N/A
Bank	46,763,000		6.19	%	60,436,834		>	8.0	%	~~75,546,042~~$	75,546,042	>	>	~~10.0~~	%10.0	%
Tier I Capital To Risk Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$	36,490,000	4.83	%	$	30,219,462	>	4.0	%	N/A				~~N/A~~	N/A
Bank	35,771,000		4.73	%	30,250,317		>	4.0	%	~~45,375,476~~$	45,375,476	>	>	~~6.0~~	%6.0	%
Tier I Capital To Average Assets
Consolidated	$	36,490,000	3.44	%	$	42,430,233	>	4.0	%	N/A				~~N/A~~	N/A
Bank	35,771,000		3.37	%	42,458,160		>	4.0	%	~~53,072,700~~$	53,072,700	>	>	~~5.0~~	%5.0	%

We had outstanding junior subordinated debentures commonly referred to as Trust Preferred Securities totaling $10.3 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The Trust Preferred Securities qualify as a Tier I capital under risk-based capital guidelines provided that total Trust Preferred Securities do not exceed certain ~~quantitative~~ quantitative limits. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, ~~and~~$6.6 ~~December 31,~~million of the Trust Preferred Securities qualified as Tier 1 ~~2009,~~capital and all of the Trust Preferred Securities ~~qualify~~qualified as a Tier I capital at December 31, 2009. We had outstanding subordinated debentures totaling $1.4 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The subordinated debentures qualify as a Tier II capital under risk-based capital guidelines. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all of the subordinated debentures qualify as a Tier II capital.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

For the ~~Six~~ Nine Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010

Pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K, no disclosure under this item is required.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010

The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, supervised and participated in an evaluation of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in federal securities rules) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on, and as of the date of, that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in accumulating and communicating information to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures of that information under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in reports that are filed or submitted by the Company pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

During the ~~second~~third quarter of 2010, there were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or, to the Company’s knowledge, in other factors that could significantly affect those internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. However, the design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Table of Contents

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Part II. Other Information

For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2010

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION:

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Please refer to the material pending legal proceedings discussed in Part I, “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no material developments in the matters discussed in our Annual Report and there are no further material legal proceedings to which the Company or the Bank is a party or of which their property is the subject.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed below and in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described below and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Due to our current noncompliance with the Order and risk of future noncompliance we may be subject to certain additional operational and financial restrictions that will require us to take specific actions.

The Bank is currently categorized as “significantly undercapitalized” and, pursuant to the prompt corrective action provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the prompt corrective action regulations of the FDIC promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “PCA Provisions”), the Bank received Notification of Prompt Corrective Action from the FDIC on March 26, 2010, which required that the Bank file a capital restoration plan within 45 days of receiving the Notification. In addition, because of the Bank’s “significantly-undercapitalized” status, the Bank is automatically subject to, among other things, restrictions on dividends, management fees, and asset growth, and is prohibited from opening new branches, making acquisitions or engaging in new lines of business without the approval of the FDIC.

Significantly undercapitalized depository institutions may also be subject to any of the following requirements and restrictions, including: (i) selling sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized; (ii) directing the Bank to merge or be acquired: (iii) limiting certain affiliate transactions; (iv) restricting interest rates paid on deposits; (v) restricting asset growth or reducing total assets, (vi) altering or eliminating any activities that pose excessive risk to the Bank; (vii) improving management through an election of a new board of directors, dismissals, or the hiring of new executives, (viii) ceasing the acceptance of deposits from correspondent banks, (ix) divesting the holding company; and (x) performing any other appropriate action.

If the capital at the Bank further deteriorates, and the Bank is categorized as critically undercapitalized, subject to limited exceptions, it will be subject to the appointment, by the appropriate federal banking agency, of a receiver or conservator within 90 days of the date on which it becomes critically undercapitalized. In addition, critically-undercapitalized banks are prohibited from paying principal or interest on subordinated debt without FDIC approval. FDIC approval is also required for a critically- undercapitalized institution to engage in certain activities, including, but not limited to, entering into any material transaction other than in the usual course of business, extending credit for any highly leveraged transaction, making any material change in accounting methods, amending its articles or bylaws, engaging in any “covered transaction” with an affiliate (as defined in section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act), paying excessive compensation or bonuses, and paying interest on deposits in excess of the prevailing rate in the institution’s market area.

In addition, because the Bank is not in compliance with the Order, it could also be subject to enforcement actions by the FDIC and Georgia Department. The various enforcement measures available to the FDIC and Georgia Department, include the imposition of a conservator or receiver (which would likely result in a substantial diminution or a total loss of the Company’s investment in the Bank), the judicial enforcement of the Order, the termination of insurance of deposits, the imposition of civil money penalties, and the issuance of removal and

Table of Contents

prohibition orders against institution-affiliated parties and the imposition of restrictions and sanctions under the prompt corrective action provisions discussed above.

Further noncompliance with the Order, the failure to comply with our capital restoration plan, or further deterioration of our capital, could impact our ability to continue operations and, in such a scenario, it is unlikely that our shareholders would realize any value for their common stock.

We need to raise additional capital that may not be available to us.

Regulatory authorities require us to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. As described above, we are significantly-undercapitalized and have an immediate need to raise capital. In addition, even if we succeed in raising this capital, we may need to raise additional capital in the future due to additional losses or regulatory mandates. The ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend in part on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, additional capital may not be raised, if and when needed, on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to increase our capital ratios could be materially impaired and we could face additional regulatory challenges. In addition, if we issue additional equity capital, it may be at a lower price and in all cases our existing shareholders’ interest would be diluted.

Compliance with the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Reform Act may adversely impact our earnings.

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Reform Act”) into law. The Dodd-Frank Reform Act represents a significant overhaul of many aspects of the regulation of the financial-services industry. Major elements in the Dodd-Frank Reform Act include the following:

· The establishment of the Financial Stability Oversight Counsel, which will be responsible for identifying and monitoring systemic risks posed by financial firms, activities, and practices.

· Enhanced supervision of large bank holding companies (i.e., those with over $50 billion in total consolidated assets), with more stringent supervisory standards to be applied to them.

· The creation of a special regime to allow for the orderly liquidation of systemically important financial companies, including the establishment of an orderly liquidation fund.

· The development of regulations to address derivatives markets, including clearing and exchange trading requirements and a framework for regulating derivatives-market participants.

· Enhanced supervision of credit-rating agencies through the Office of Credit Ratings within the SEC.

· Increased regulation of asset-backed securities, including a requirement that issuers of asset-backed securities retain at least 5% of the risk of the asset-backed securities.

· The establishment of a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, within the Federal Reserve, to serve as a dedicated consumer-protection regulatory body.

· Amendments to the Truth in Lending Act aimed at improving consumer protections with respect to mortgage originations, including originator compensation, minimum repayment standards, and prepayment considerations.

The majority of the provisions in the Dodd-Frank Reform Act are aimed at financial institutions that are significantly larger than the Company or the Bank. Nonetheless, there are provisions with which we will have to comply now that the Dodd-Frank Reform Bill is signed into law. As rules and regulations are promulgated by the federal agencies responsible for implementing and enforcing the provisions in the Dodd-Frank Reform Act, we will have to work to apply resources to ensure that we are in compliance with all applicable provisions, which may adversely impact our earnings.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable

Table of Contents

Item 4. Reserved

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ATLANTIC SOUTHERN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

/s/ Mark A. Stevens

Mark A. Stevens
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: ~~July 23~~November 12, 2010

Filing Compare · Atlantic Southern Financial Group, Inc.