UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File number: 000-51836

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Illinois		36-4368292
(State of Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

c/o Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.

General Partner

141 West Jackson Boulevard Suite 1320A

Chicago, Illinois

60604

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(312) 264-4375

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Units of Limited Partnership

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes☐ No☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes☐ No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes☒No☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (Sec. 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes☒No☐

Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes☒No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☒

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes☐ No☒

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

PART I

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

(a) General development

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is an Illinois Limited Partnership established in May 2000. The Partnership invests and trades a portfolio primarily of commodity futures and forward contracts designed to track the change in values of the Rogers International Commodity Index® (the “Index”). The Partnership commenced trading during November 2001. Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company (“Beeland Management”), serves as the general partner of the Partnership.

The Partnership originally filed a registration statement, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to register $200 million of units of limited partnership interest (the “Series A units”), which registration statement became effective in January 2001. The Partnership’s initial offering period was held during fiscal year 2001. The Series A units were initially offered for sale at a fixed price of $100. An initial closing was held after a minimum of 50,000 units in subscriptions was received.

The net proceeds from the initial closing, after deducting the subscription fee, were placed in a trading account with the Partnership's futures commission merchant and were used to acquire a portfolio of futures positions, consistent with the Partnership’s trading policies, as well as U.S. Government obligations.

The Partnership subsequently filed an additional registration statement with the SEC to bring the total dollar amount of Series A units registered for sale to approximately $245,405,200, and a total of 677,673.54 of units have been sold to the public as of March 1, ~~2016~~2017.

Effective September 22, 2010, the Partnership filed an additional registration statement with the SEC to register $150,000,000 of Series B Units of limited partnership interest (the “Series B units”). A total of $1,280,078 of Series B units has been sold to the public as of March 1, ~~2016~~2017. Series A and Series B units are identical with respect to participation in the Partnership’s profits or losses. Series B units dodid not, however, participate in any Partnership recoveries arising out of the bankruptcy of Refco Inc. and its affiliates. Effective May 1, 2013, the Partnership ceased offering its units of limited partnership and subsequently deregistered the unsold balance of its registered units.

The Partnership will terminate December 31, 2020 or earlier upon certain circumstances as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement.

(b) Financial information about segments

The Partnership’s business constitutes only one business segment, i.e., a speculative commodity pool. The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods and services. Financial information regarding the Partnership’s business is set forth in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

The Partnership invests and trades in a portfolio of commodity futures and forward contracts. The Partnership’s investment activities are designed to replicate the positions that comprise the Rogers International Commodity Index ® (the “Index”). The Index consists of a compendium, sometimes known as a basket, of raw materials employed within the world economy and traded on established exchanges as futures and forward contracts. The Partnership invests and trades exclusively on the “long side” of the market. This means that the Partnership only buys positions in commodities and does not engage in any short-selling. The Partnership historically has closed out all positions by making an offsetting sale and has not taken delivery of the actual commodities, although it may take delivery in the future. Funds for its business were obtained only by the sale of units of limited partnership interest and from the retention of any profits generated from the Partnership’s trading. At ~~December~~ December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the Partnership was not accepting contributions.

The Index was developed by James Beeland Rogers, Jr. to be a balanced, representative, international raw materials index. Beeland Management believes that the Index includes most of the publicly traded raw materials used in international commerce for which futures contracts or forward contracts are regularly traded in recognized markets. Beeland Management attempts to replicate the composition of the Index using various commodity futures contracts. The initial components of the Index and their weightings were chosen by Mr. Rogers based on his perception of the relative importance of the underlying raw materials in international trade and commerce. A committee now formulates and enacts all business assessments and decisions regarding the composition of the Index. Mr. Rogers, as the founder and owner of the Index, chairs that committee and is the final arbiter of its decisions. “Rogers International Commodity Index” is a registered service mark of Beeland Interests, Inc., a company wholly owned by Mr. Rogers. Beeland Management uses and publishes the Index and markets products designed to track the Index pursuant to a nonexclusive license from Beeland Interests, Inc.

Since the Partnership’s portfolio is based on the Index, there is no active trading by Beeland Management in the traditional sense. Unlike most commodity pools, commodity contracts are not bought or sold to take advantage of potential profitable price movement. Other than effecting trades to reflect a possible adjustment in the composition of the Index or the weightings among its components, the only regular trading performed by Beeland Management is for rolling positions from near delivery dates to later delivery dates to ensure that the Partnership will not take actual delivery of a physical commodity. These rolling trades, made pursuant to a predetermined formula and rules, are placed and effected, to the extent possible, as spread transactions in which the Partnership simultaneously buys and sells futures contracts corresponding to the same commodity but for delivery in different months.

The Partnership’s principal objective is to provide an alternative investment vehicle for investors with diversified investment portfolios. The performance of the Partnership is not correlated with traditional securities markets. In other words, the performance of the Partnership is largely independent from how the traditional equity and debt markets perform. Accordingly, the Partnership’s returns will not necessarily increase when that of stocks or bonds increase and will not necessarily decrease when that of stocks or bonds decrease. However, the Partnership will not necessarily perform better when traditional markets decline, or perform worse when the traditional markets are rising.

The Partnership pays a monthly management fee to Beeland Management equal to 0.08333% of the average monthly sum of all limited partner capital accounts at the close of each month (1.00% per annum). The Partnership pays the costs of executing and clearing its trades, its administrative expenses, compensation due to its selling agents, and any extraordinary expenses which it may incur.

ADM Investor Services, Inc. (“ADMIS”) acts as the futures commission merchant for the Partnership, and The Price Futures Group, Inc., an affiliate of Beeland Management, acts as introducing broker for the Partnership. Unit holders of Series A and B units normally may be redeemed at any month end upon 6 business days written notice to the Partnership’s general partner.

Regulation

Under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “CEA”), commodity exchanges and futures trading are subject to regulation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”). National Futures Association (the “NFA”), a “registered futures association” under the CEA, is the only non-exchange self-regulatory organization for futures industry professionals. The CFTC has delegated to the NFA responsibility for the registration of “commodity trading advisors,” “commodity pool operators,” “futures commission merchants,” “introducing brokers” and their respective associated persons and “floor brokers” and “floor traders.” The CEA requires commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors, such as Beeland Management, and commodity brokers or futures commission merchants and introducing brokers, such as ADMIS and The Price Futures Group, Inc. to be registered and to comply with various reporting and record keeping requirements. The CFTC may suspend a commodity pool operator’s or trading advisor’s registration if it finds that its trading practices tend to disrupt orderly market conditions or in certain other situations. In the event that the registration of Beeland Management as a commodity pool operator or a commodity trading advisor were terminated or suspended, Beeland Management would be unable to continue to manage the business of the Partnership. Should Beeland Management’s registration be suspended, termination of the Partnership might result.

Management would be unable to continue to manage the business of the Partnership. Should Beeland Management’s registration be suspended, termination of the Partnership might result.

In addition to such registration requirements, the CFTC and certain commodity exchanges have established limits on the maximum net long or net short position which any person may hold or control in particular commodities. Most exchanges also limit the changes in futures contract prices that may occur during a single trading day. The CFTC has proposed rules for a separate position limits regime for 28 so-called “exempt” (i.e. metals and energy) and agricultural futures and options contracts and their economically equivalent swap contracts. If the CFTC rule becomes effective, Beeland Management believes that the limits, once compliance is required, will be sufficiently large that they should not restrict the Partnership’s ability to replicate the Index.

(i) through (xii) - not applicable.

(xiii) the Partnership has no employees.

(d) Financial information about geographic areas

The Partnership does not engage in material operations in foreign countries (although it does trade from the United States on foreign futures exchanges), nor is a material portion of its revenues derived from foreign customers.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

Not Required.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Required.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

The Partnership does not own or use any physical properties in the conduct of its business. Beeland Management Company L.L.C., 141 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1320A, Chicago, IL 60604, conducts the Partnership’s trading activities and performs certain administrative services for the Partnership from its offices.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNITS AND RELATED PARTNER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNITS

(a) Market Information. There is no established market for the Series A and B units, and none is likely to develop. Series A and B units normally may be redeemed upon 6 business days’ written notice to the Partnership’s general partner, Beeland Management Company, LLC, 141 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1320A, Chicago, IL 60604.

(b) Holders. There were approximately ~~420~~378 Series A and 3120 Series B Limited Partners at March 1, ~~2016~~2017.

(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans. There are no securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

(e) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities. There have been no sales of unregistered securities of the Partnership during ~~2015~~2016.

(f) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. Unitholders may redeem their Series A and B units at the end of each calendar month at the then current month-end Net Asset Value per unit. The redemption of units has no impact on the value of Series A and B units that remain outstanding, and Series A and B units are not reissued once redeemed.

The following table summarizes the redemptions by Series A and Series B Unitholders during the fourth calendar quarter of ~~2015~~2016:

Series A
		Redemption Date
Month	Units Redeemed:	NAV per Unit
October 31, 2015	(953.65)	98.85
October 31, 2016	(281.36)	90.78
November 30, 2015	(575.24)	91.02
November 30, 2016	(250.33)	92.32
December 31, 2015	(1,772.72)	86.43
December 31, 2016	(560.10)	94.46
Series B
		Redemption Date
Month	Units Redeemed:	NAV per Unit
October 31, 2015	-	96.07
October 31, 2016	-	88.15
November 30, 2015	-	88.45
November 30, 2016	(28.58)	89.64
December 31, 2015	-	83.99
December 31, 2016	(54.29)	91.71

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

INTRODUCTION

The Partnership’s trading is designed to replicate the positions which comprise the Index. The Partnership invests and trades in a portfolio of commodity futures and possibly forward contracts. The Partnership invests and trades solely on the “long side” of the market. Beeland Management, as general partner, manages all business of the Partnership.

The Index is not designed to predict which markets will exhibit positive (or negative) performance in any given year, and the specific components of the Index were not selected based on expectations of their future performance. Rather, the Index was designed to be a balanced, representative international raw materials index and to include most of the publicly traded raw materials used in international commerce. As a diversified index, the Index as a whole can be expected to produce different levels of return (including negative returns) in its various sectors from year to year.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Partnership has raised capital only through the sale of units of limited partnership interest. At December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the Partnership was not accepting contributions. The Partnership does not intend to raise any capital through borrowing. Due to the nature of the Partnership’s business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets that are not operating capital or assets.

LIQUIDITY

Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. This may affect the Partnership’s ability to close existing positions and initiate new positions when the Partnership is rolling its positions forward from one futures contract delivery month to another or when adjusting the Partnership’s portfolio to reflect additions or withdrawals of capital. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Trading in forward or other over the counter contracts introduces a possible further impact on liquidity. Because such contracts are executed “off exchange” between private parties, the time required to offset or “unwind” these positions may be greater than that for regulated instruments. Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Partnership’s trading operations; the Partnership’s assets are highly liquid and are expected to remain so. During its operations through December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the Partnership experienced no meaningful periods of illiquidity in any of the markets traded by the Partnership.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Partnership’s net income or loss is directly related to changes in the value of the Index, which the Partnership is designed to replicate, and is not dependent on trading decisions made by Beeland Management apart from balancing positions to track the Index. In periods of general market inflation, market deflation, Beeland Management would expect the value of the Index to decrease. The Partnership’s performance may be negative in years when the Index’s performance is positive due to fees charged.

The components of the Partnership’s return are normally the gains and losses recognized from the changes in futures market prices and the interest income earned on cash balances. The mechanics and rules of futures markets allow the Partnership to earn interest on approximately 90% to 100% of its assets.

Selected Financial Data
For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Revenue
Net realized and unrealized losses	$	(2695,~~440,615)~~654		$	(32,~~194~~440,~~298~~615)
Interest income		411,~~040~~367			74,~~105~~040
Other income		-			25,725
Expenses
Administrative expenses		~~159~~125,~~655~~164			~~249~~159,~~901~~655
Brokerage commissions		2720,~~302~~781			3927,~~746~~302
Management fees		8756,~~562~~829			~~165~~87,~~291~~562
Net Income (Loss)	$	(2504,~~711,094)~~247	$	$	(32,~~616~~711,~~406~~094)
Net Assets	$	65,~~066~~690,~~169~~287	$	$	106,~~541~~066,~~678~~169

2016

During 2016, the Index and the Partnership experienced positive performance. The Index can be categorized into three sectors: agriculture, energy and metals. During 2016, the performance of the Index’s sectors were all positive. Agriculture, energy and metals sectors posted increases of 0.79%, 8.12% and 3.99%, respectively. The Index returned 13.35% while the Partnership returned 9.28%. Performance of the Partnership deviated from the Index due to the expenses charged at the Partnership level.

The Partnership had no capital contributions in 2016. The total capital withdrawals in 2016 were $880,129.

2015

During 2015, the Index and the Partnership experienced negative performance. The Index can be categorized into three sectors: agriculture, energy and metals. During 2015, the performance of the Index’s sectors were all negative. Agriculture, energy and metals sectors posted decreases of -5.37%, -18.39% and -4.90%, respectively. The Index returned -26.08% while the Partnership returned -28.98%. Performance of the Partnership deviated from the Index due to the expenses charged at the Partnership level.

The Partnership had no capital contributions in 2015. The total capital withdrawals in 2015 were $1,764,415.

2014

During 2014, the Index and the Partnership experienced negative performance. The Index can be categorized into three sectors: agriculture, energy and metals. During 2014, the performance of the Index’s sectors were all negative. Agriculture, energy and metals sectors posted decreases of -1.97%, -19.89% and -2.29%, respectively. The Index returned -22.21% while the Partnership returned -24.10%. Performance of the Partnership deviated from the Index due to the expenses charged at the Partnership level.

The Partnership had no capital contributions in 2014. The total capital withdrawals in 2014 were $4,278,118.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Partnership trades primarily in futures and forward contracts and may therefore become a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. Market risks arise from changes in the market value of financial instruments. Theoretically, the Partnership’s exposure is equal to the notional contract value of futures contracts entered. Exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships between financial instruments, and the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the financial instruments are traded. Credit risk arises primarily from the potential inability of counterparties to perform in accordance with the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance is generally the net unrealized gain on the open positions plus the value of the margin or collateral held by the counterparty. Exchange-traded financial instruments generally do not give rise to significant counterparty exposure due to the cash settlement procedures for daily market movements and the margin requirements of individual exchanges. Financial instruments traded off-exchange give rise to the risk of the failure of, or the inability or refusal to perform by, the counterparties to such trades.

The Partnership clears all of its futures trades through one clearing broker, ADMIS. In the event this counterparty does not fulfill its obligations, the Partnership may be exposed to risk. This risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparties to these transactions. The Partnership has a substantial portion of its assets on deposit with financial institutions in connection with its cash management activities. In the event of a financial institution’s insolvency, recovery of the Partnership’s assets on deposit may be limited to the amount of insurance or other protection afforded such deposits. The Partnership attempts to minimize this credit risk by monitoring the creditworthiness of the clearing broker and financial institutions.

portion of its assets on deposit with financial institutions in connection with its cash management activities. In the event of a financial institution’s insolvency, recovery of the Partnership’s assets on deposit may be limited to the amount of insurance or other protection afforded such deposits. The Partnership attempts to minimize this credit risk by monitoring the creditworthiness of the clearing broker and financial institutions.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES – VALUATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP’S POSITIONS

Beeland Management believes that the accounting policies that are most critical to the Partnership’s financial condition and results of operations relate to the valuation of the Partnership’s positions. The Partnership’s positions are exchange-traded futures contracts, which are valued daily at settlement prices published by the exchanges. Thus, Beeland Management expects that under normal circumstances substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are valued on a daily basis using objective measures.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Based on the nature of the business and operations of the Partnership, Beeland Management believes that the estimates utilized in preparing the Partnership’s financial statements are appropriate and reasonable; however actual results could differ from these estimates. The estimates used do not provide a range of possible results that would require the exercise of subjective judgment. Beeland Management further believes that, based on the nature of the business and operations of the Partnership, no other reasonable assumptions relating to the application of the Partnership’s accounting estimates other than those currently used would likely result in materially different amounts from those reported.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Partnership does not engage in off-balance sheet arrangements with other entities.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The Partnership does not enter into any contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments of a type that would be typical for an operating company or that would affect its liquidity or capital resources. The Partnership’s sole business is trading futures, forwards, and other over the counter contracts. All such contracts are settled by offset, not delivery. The Partnership’s financial statements, included in Item 8 of this report, present audited Schedules of Investments setting forth unrealized gains and losses on the Partnership’s open futures contracts at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following financial statements of The Rogers International Raw Materials Fund are included in Item 8.
Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm-2015 and 2014		F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm-2016 and 2015		F-1
Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2015 and 2014		F-2
Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2016 and 2015		F-2
Condensed Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2015		F-3
Condensed Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2016		F-3
Condensed Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2014		F-4
Condensed Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2015		F-4
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014		F-5
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015		F-5
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital (Net Assets) for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014		F-6
Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital (Net Assets) for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015		F-6
Notes to Financial Statements		F-7-1413

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Partners

Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition, including the condensed schedules of investments, of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, and the related statements of operations and changes in partners’ capital (net assets) for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, and the results of its operations and changes in partners’ capital for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Spicer Jeffries LLP

Greenwood Village, Colorado

March 30, ~~2016~~2017

F-1

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31, 2015 and 2014
December 31, 2016 and 2015
	2015		2014
	2016		2015
ASSETS
Equity in broker trading accounts:
Cash at brokers	$	1787,~~932,056~~766	$	21,~~269~~932,~~630~~056
Unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts, net		(186,937)		(505,782)
Unrealized loss on open futures contracts, net		(26,551)		(186,937)
Total equity in brokers trading accounts		1761,~~745,119~~215		1,~~763~~745,~~848~~119
U.S. Government securities, at fair value		23,~~999,~~396,501		92,~~498~~999,~~692~~396
Cash and cash equivalents		1,~~743~~823,~~738~~389		~~265~~1,~~878~~743,738
Total assets	$	65,~~488~~981,~~253~~105	$	116,~~528~~488,~~418~~253
LIABILITIES
Brokerage commissions payable	$	1,455	$	21,~~690~~455
Accrued management fees – General Partner		54,~~458~~682		95,~~968~~458
Administrative and other fees payable		~~162~~115,~~097~~990		~~118~~162,~~838~~097
Withdrawals payable		~~253~~168,~~074~~691		~~855~~253,~~244~~074
Total liabilities		~~422~~290,~~084~~818		~~986~~422,~~740~~084
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (NET ASSETS)
Partners’ capital (net assets)		65,~~066~~690,~~169~~287		106,~~541~~066,~~678~~169
Total liabilities and partners’ capital (net assets)	$	65,~~488~~981,~~253~~105	$	116,~~528~~488,~~418~~253
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-2

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.

CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

U.S. Government securities:	Fair Value		Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)
(total cost - $2,998,967)
(total cost - $3,393,914)
U.S. Treasury Bills due 4/14/2016 at 0.07%, principal amount $3,000,000	$	2,999,396	49.44	%
U.S. Treasury Bills due 02/02/2017 at 0.29%, principal amount $1,100,000	$	1,099,709	19.33	%
U.S. Treasury Bills due 03/30/2017 at 0.42%, principal amount $1,100,000		1,098,880	19.31
U.S. Treasury Bills due 04/27/2017 at 0.54%, principal amount $1,200,000		1,197,912	21.05
	$	3,396,501	59.69	%
	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Contracts		Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)
Futures contracts*:
U.S. Futures Positions
Agricultural	$	(4843,~~825~~409)	(0.8176)	%
Metals		(3448,~~255~~320)	(0.5685)
Energy		~~(68~~33,~~629)~~609	(10.~~13)~~59
Total U.S. Futures Positions		(~~151~~58,~~709~~120)	(21.5002)
Foreign Futures Positions
Agricultural		(73,~~405)~~361	(0.~~12)~~06
Metals		~~(27~~28,~~823)~~208	(0.~~46)~~50
Total Foreign Futures Positions		~~(35~~31,~~228)~~569	(0.~~58)~~56
Total Futures Contracts	$	(~~186~~26,~~937~~551)	(30.0846)	%
*No individual futures contract position constitutes greater than 1 percent of Partners’ Capital (Net Assets).
Accordingly, the number of contracts and expiration dates are not presented.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-3

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.

CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

December 31, ~~2014~~2015

U.S. Government securities:	Fair Value		Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)
(total cost - $9,497,527)
(total cost - $2,998,967)
U.S. Treasury Bills due 2/12/2015 at 0.05%, principal amount $4,500,000	$	4,499,760	42.69	%
U.S. Treasury Bills due 4/14/2016 at 0.07%, principal amount $3,000,000	$	2,999,396	49.44	%
U.S. Treasury Bills due 4/16/2015 at 0.04%, principal amount $1,500,000		1,499,827	14.23
U.S. Treasury Bills due 5/21/2015 at 0.07%, principal amount $3,500,000		3,499,105	33.19
	$	9,498,692	90.11	%
	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Open Long Contracts		Percent of Partners' Capital (Net Assets)
Futures contracts*:
U.S. Futures Positions
Agricultural	$	(3048,~~914~~825)	(0.2981)	%
Metals		(2634,~~100~~255)	(0.2556)
Energy		(~~339~~68,~~257~~629)	(31.2213)
Total U.S. Futures Positions		(~~396~~151,~~271~~709)	(32.7650)
Foreign Futures Positions
Agricultural		16(7,~~984~~405)	(0.1612)
Metals		(~~126~~27,~~495~~823)	(10.2046)
Total Foreign Futures Positions		(~~109~~35,~~511~~228)	(10.0458)
Total Futures Contracts	$	(~~505~~186,~~782~~937)	(43.8008)	%
*No individual futures contract position constitutes greater than 1 percent of Partners’ Capital (Net Assets).
Accordingly, the number of contracts and expiration dates are not presented.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-4

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
	2015		2014
	2016		2015
Net trading gains (losses):
Realized	$	(2,759,460)	$	(2,915,724)
Realized gains (losses) on futures contracts	$	535,268	$	(2,759,460)
Change in unrealized		318,845		(278,574)
Change in unrealized gains on open futures contracts		160,386		318,845
Commissions		(27,302)		(39,746)
Brokerage commissions		(20,781)		(27,302)
		(2,467,917)		(3,234,044)
		674,873		(2,467,917)
Investment income:
Interest income		411,~~040~~367		74,~~105~~040
Other income		-		25,725
		11,367		4,040
		4,040		32,830
Expenses:
Management fees – General Partner		8756,~~562~~829		~~165~~87,~~291~~562
Administrative and other fees		~~159~~125,~~655~~164		~~249~~159,~~901~~655
		247,217		415,192
		181,993		247,217
Net investment income (loss)		(243,177)		(382,362)
Net investment loss		(170,626)		(243,177)
Net income (loss)	$	(2504,~~711,094)~~247	$	(32,~~616~~711,~~406~~094)
Net increase (decrease) in NAV per GP and LP unit for the period:
General Partner	$	(352.2742)	$	(3835.6427)
Limited Partners-Series A	$	~~(35~~8.~~27)~~03	$	(3835.6427)
Limited Partners-Series B	$	~~(34~~7.~~37)~~72	$	(3834.0637)
Net income (loss) per General and Limited Partners (based on weighted average number of units outstanding during the period):
General Partner	$	(463,~~345~~183)	$	(5046,~~768~~345)
Limited Partners-Series A		(2487,~~539,232)~~051		(32,~~378~~539,~~096~~232)
Limited Partners-Series B		~~(125~~20,~~517)~~379		(~~187~~125,~~542~~517)
	$	(2504,~~711,094)~~247	$	(32,~~616~~711,~~406~~094)
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-5

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (NET ASSETS)
For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
	General Partner					~~Limited Partners~~	Limited Partners
						~~Series A~~	Series A			~~Series B~~		Series B
		Number of Units		~~Dollars~~	Dollars	~~Number of Units~~	Number of Units	~~Dollars~~		~~Number of Units~~Dollars		~~Dollars~~Number of Units	~~Total~~		Dollars	~~Total~~	Total		Total
Partners’ capital (net assets), January 1, 2014		1,314	$	210,692		108,236	$	17,354,304		5,569	$	871,206	$	18,225,510		$	18,436,202
Partners’ capital (net assets), January 1, 2015		1,314		$	159,924		80,908		$	9,846,684		4,520		$	535,070		$	10,381,754	$	10,541,678
Net income		-		(50,768)		-		(3,378,096)		-		(187,542)		(3,565,638)			(3,616,406)
Net loss		-			(46,345)		-			(2,539,232)		-			(125,517)			(2,664,749)		(2,711,094)
Withdrawals		-		-	-	~~(27,328)~~	(14,998)	~~(4,129,524)~~		(1,~~049~~610,617)		(~~148~~1,~~594~~475)		~~(4,278,118)~~	(153,798)		~~(4,278,118)~~	(1,764,415)		(1,764,415)
Partners’ capital (net assets), December 31, 2014		1,314		159,924		80,908		9,846,684		4,520		535,070		10,381,754			10,541,678
Partners’ capital (net assets), December 31, 2015		1,314		$	113,579		65,910		$	5,696,835		3,045		$	255,755		$	5,952,590	$	6,066,169
Net loss		-		(46,345)		-		(2,539,232)		-		(125,517)		(2,664,749)			(2,711,094)
Net income (loss)		-			(3,183)		-			487,051		-			20,379			507,430		504,247
Withdrawals		-(1,314)		-	(110,396)	~~(14,998)~~	(8,148)	~~(1,610,617)~~		(1728,~~475~~011)		(~~153,798~~489)		~~(1,764,415)~~	(41,722)		~~(1,764,415)~~	(769,733)		(880,129)
Partners’ capital (net assets), December 31, 2015		1,314	$	113,579		65,910	$	5,696,835		3,045	$	255,755	$	5,952,590		$	6,066,169
Partners’ capital (net assets), December 31, 2016		-		$	-		57,762		$	5,455,875		2,556		$	234,412		$	5,690,287	$	5,690,287
Per unit data			~~2015~~	2016	~~2014~~	2015
Net asset value Series A				~~$ 86.43~~	$ 94.46	~~$ 121.70~~	$ 86.43
Net asset value Series B				~~$ 83.99~~	$ 91.71	~~$ 118.36~~	$ 83.99
Net asset value General Partner				~~$ 86.43~~	$ -	~~$ 121.70~~	$ 86.43
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-6

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies:

Nature of Business and Organization: Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the "Partnership") is an Illinois Limited Partnership that was established in May 2000. The Partnership trades a portfolio primarily of commodity futures contracts, principally on recognized exchanges. The Partnership may also purchase contracts in the over the counter marketplace under certain circumstances. The Partnership invests and trades exclusively on the “long side” of the market. The Partnership’s investment strategy is designed to replicate the Rogers International Commodity Index® (the “Index”) and positions are rebalanced monthly to maintain the Index’s relative weightings. The Partnership commenced trading during November 2001. The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2020 or earlier upon certain circumstances as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement. The Partnership’s General Partner and commodity pool operator is Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. (the “General Partner”). Beeland Interests, Inc. is the owner and sponsor of the Index.

Accounting Policies: The Partnership follows Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), as established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), to ensure consistent reporting of financial condition and results of operation. The Partnership is an investment company and follows the accounting and reporting guidelines in FASB Topic 946.

Net Assets: The valuation of net assets includes open commodity futures owned by the Partnership, if any, at the end of the period. The unrealized gain or loss on these contracts has been calculated based on settlement prices on the last business day of each month. Net assets are determined by subtracting liabilities from assets, which also equals partners’ capital.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents include amounts on deposit with a broker to facilitate payment of expenses and partner withdrawals.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Securities and derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value.

Deposits with Brokers: The Partnership deposits assets with brokers subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations and various exchange and broker requirements. Margin requirements are satisfied by the deposit of cash with such brokers. The Partnership earns interest income on its assets deposited with the brokers.

Revenue Recognition: Futures and forward contracts are recorded on a trade date basis and realized gains or losses are recognized when contracts are liquidated. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the statements of financial condition as a net unrealized gain or loss, as there exists a right of offset of unrealized gains or losses. Any change in net unrealized gain or loss from the preceding period is reported in the statement of operations.

Interest Income Recognition: The Partnership records interest income on the accrual basis.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation: Foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the last business day of each month. The Partnership does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities and derivative financial instruments held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized trading gains or losses.

Income Taxes: No provision for income taxes has been made in these financial statements as each partner is individually responsible for reporting income or loss based on its respective share of the Partnership’s income and expenses as reported for income tax purposes.

The Partnership is generally not subject to examination by U.S. federal or state taxing authorities for tax years before ~~2012~~2013. The Partnership has no material uncertain tax positions, and accordingly, has not recorded a liability for the payment of interest or penalties through December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Profit and Loss Allocation: Limited partners and the General Partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in the proportion that each partner’s capital account bears to the total partners’ capital.

F-7

Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies (continued):

Withdrawals Payable: Withdrawals approved by the General Partner prior to month-end with a fixed effective date and fixed amount are recorded as withdrawals payable as of month-end (See Note 5).

Statement of Cash Flows: The Partnership has elected not to provide a statement of cash flows as permitted by GAAP as all of the following conditions have been met:

-During the years, substantially all of the Partnership’s investments were level 1 or 2;

-Substantially all of the Partnership’s investments are carried at fair value;

-The Partnership had little or no debt during the years;

-The Partnership’s financial statements include a statement of changes in partners’ capital (net assets).

Note 2. Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

As described in Note 1, the Partnership records its investments at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Partnership utilizes valuation techniques to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Inputs are broadly defined as assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized within the fair value hierarchy based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1. Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2. Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.

Level 3. Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. The inputs into the determination of fair value are based upon the best information in the circumstances and may require significant management judgment or estimation.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Partnership’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. The following section describes the valuation techniques used by the Partnership to measure different financial instruments at fair value and includes the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the financial instrument is categorized.

The fair values of exchange traded futures contracts are based upon exchange settlement prices. Money market funds included in cash at brokers are valued using quoted market prices. U.S. Government securities are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value based on quoted prices for identical assets in an active market. These financial instruments are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table summarizes the Partnership’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 using the fair value hierarchy:


	2016		2015
Description	Level 1		Level 1
Equity in brokers trading account:
Unrealized loss on open futures contracts, net*	$	(26,551)	$	(186,937)
U.S. Government securities*		3,396,501		2,999,396
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market funds		1,785,735		1,553,238
Total assets at fair value	$	5,155,685	$	4,365,697

*See the condensed schedule of investments for further description.

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no Level 2 or Level 3 assets or liabilities.

F-8

Note 2. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued):

	2015		2014
Description	Level 1		Level 1
Equity in brokers trading account:
Unrealized loss on open futures contracts, net*	$	(186,937)	$	(505,782)
U.S. Government securities*		2,999,396		9,498,692
Cash and cash equivalents:
Money market funds		1,553,238		198,304
	$	4,365,697	$	9,191,214

The Partnership assesses the levels of assets and liabilities measured at fair value at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the accrual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers among Levels 1, 2, and 3 during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

*See the condensed schedule of investments for further description.

During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, there were no Level 2 or Level 3 assets or liabilities.

In addition, substantially all of the Partnership’s other assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments and are reflected at fair value, or at carrying amounts that approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments.

Note 3. Derivative Transactions:

The Partnership’s business is the speculative trading of futures contracts. The Partnership does not consider any derivative instruments to be hedging instruments, as this term is generally understood under FASB guidance.

As of and for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, the Partnership’s derivative contracts had the following impact on the statements of financial condition and statements of operations:

	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2016		December 31, 2016
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	25,689	$	(65,737)	$	(40,048)
Metals		90,395		(110,507)		(20,112)
Energy		36,407		(2,798)		33,609
	$	152,491	$	(179,042)	$	(26,551)
	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	December 31, 2015		December 31, 2015		December 31, 2015
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	29,693	$	(85,923)	$	(56,230)
Metals		56,112		(118,190)		(62,078)
Energy		21,106		(89,735)		(68,629)
	$	106,911	$	(293,848)	$	(186,937)
	Asset Derivatives		Liability Derivatives		Net Derivatives
	December 31, 2014		December 31, 2014		December 31, 2014
	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value*
Futures positions:
Agricultural	$	77,898	$	(91,828)	$	(13,930)
Metals		98,632		(251,227)		(152,595)
Energy		1,800		(341,057)		(339,257)
	$	178,330	$	(684,112)	$	(505,782)

*The net fair value of all assets and liability derivatives is included in equity in broker trading accounts in the statements of financial condition.

Trading Revenue** for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:


Type of Instrument	12/31/2016		12/31/2015

Type of Contract
Agricultural	$	33,909	$	(483,591)
Metal		230,910		(661,292)
Energy		430,835		(1,295,732)
	$	695,654	$	(2,440,615)

Line Item in Statements of Operations
Realized gains (losses) on futures contracts	$	535,268	$	(2,759,460)
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on open futures contracts		160,386		318,845
	$	695,654	$	(2,440,615)

** Trading gains and losses is exclusive of brokerage commissions.

F-9

Note 3. Derivative Transactions (continued):

~~Trading~~For ~~Revenue** for~~ the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the monthly average number of contracts bought and ~~2014:~~sold was 239 and 376, respectively.

Type of Instrument		12/31/2015			12/31/2014
Year ended December 31, 2016
Type of Contract
		Gross Amount of Recognized Assets and Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition		Net Amount of Unrealized Loss Presented in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
Agricultural		$	(483,591)		$	(351,735)
Assets
Metal			(661,292)			(261,234)
US and foreign futures contracts	$	152,491	$	(152,491)	$	-
Energy			(1,295,732)			(2,581,329)
Liabilities
		$	(2,440,615)		$	(3,194,298)
US and foreign futures contracts		179,042		(152,491)		26,551
Line Item in Statements of Operations
Derivatives Assets and Liabilities and Collateral Received by Counterparty
Realized gains (losses) on futures contracts		$	(2,759,460)		$	(2,915,724)
As of December 31, 2016
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on open futures contracts			318,845			(278,574)
		Net Amount of
		$	(2,440,615)		$	(3,194,298)
		Unrealized Gain (Loss)		Gross Amounts Not Offset in
		Presented in the Statement		the Statement of Financial Condition
Counterparty		of Financial Condition		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Deposited	Net Amount
ADM Investor Services, Inc.	$	(26,551)	$	-	$	26,551	$	-
Total	$	(26,551)	$	-	$	26,551	$	-

** Trading gains and losses is exclusive of brokerage commissions.


Year ended December 31, 2015
		Gross Amount of Recognized Assets and Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition		Net Amount of Unrealized Loss Presented in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
Assets
US and foreign futures contracts	$	106,911	$	(106,911)	$	-

Liabilities
US and foreign futures contracts		293,848		(106,911)		186,937

Derivatives Assets and Liabilities and Collateral Received by Counterparty
As of December 31, 2015

		Net Amount of
		Unrealized Gain (Loss)		Gross Amounts Not Offset in
		Presented in the Statement		the Statement of Financial Condition
Counterparty		of Financial Condition		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Deposited	Net Amount

ADM Investor Services, Inc.	$	(186,937)	$	-	$	186,937	$	-
Total	$	(186,937)	$	-	$	186,937	$	-

For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the monthly average number of contracts bought and sold was 376 and 561, respectively.

Year ended December 31, 2015
	Gross Amount of Recognized Assets and Liabilities	Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition	Net Amount of Unrealized Loss Presented in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
Assets
US and foreign futures contracts	$ 106,911	$ (106,911)	$ -
Liabilities
US and foreign futures contracts	$ 293,848	$ (106,911)	$ 186,937
Derivatives Assets and Liabilities and Collateral Received by Counterparty
As December 31, 2015
	Net Amount of Unrealized Loss Presented in the Consolidated Statement	Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Condition
Counterparty	of Financial Condition	Financial Instruments	Cash Collateral Deposited	Net Amount
ADM Investor Services, Inc	$ (186,937)	$ -	$ 186,937	$ -
Total	$ (186,937)	$ -	$ 186,937	$ -

F-10

Note 3. Derivative Transactions (continued):

Year ended December 31, 2014
	Gross Amount of Recognized Assets and Liabilities	Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition	Net Amount of Unrealized Loss Presented in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
Assets
US and foreign futures contracts	$ 178,330	$ (178,330)	$ -
Liabilities
US and foreign futures contracts	$ 684,112	$ (178,330)	$ 505,782
Derivatives Assets and Liabilities and Collateral Received by Counterparty
As December 31, 2014
	Net Amount of Unrealized Loss Presented in the Consolidated Statement	Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Condition
Counterparty	of Financial Condition	Financial Instruments	Cash Collateral Deposited	Net Amount
ADM Investor Services, Inc	$ (505,782)	$ -	$ 505,782	$ -
Total	$ (505,782)	$ -	$ 505,782	$ -

Notional Value for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:


	December 31, 2016
	Long exposure		Short exposure
Primary underlying risk	Notional amounts	Number of contracts	Notional amounts	Number of contracts
Equity price
Futures	$ 5,949,980	156	$ -	-

	December 31, 2015
	Long exposure		Short exposure
Primary underlying risk	Notional amounts	Number of contracts	Notional amounts	Number of contracts
Equity price
Futures	$ 6,039,273	194	$ -	-

Note 4. Agreements and Related-Party Transactions:

The Limited Partnership Agreement vests all responsibility and powers for the management of the business and affairs of the Partnership with the General Partner, Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. including trading decisions.

The Partnership pays a monthly management fee to the General Partner equal to 0.08333% of the net assets of the Partnership at the close of the preceding month (1.00% per annum).

The Partnership is responsible for the administrative and trading expenses related to its operations. The General Partner may incur certain expenses on behalf of the Partnership and charge the Partnership for its allocable portion of these expenses.

Uhlmann Price Securities L.L.C. (“Uhlmann”), a party related to the General Partner by reason of common management, and from April 2013 to December ~~2015~~2016, common ownership, acts as the selling group manager for the Partnership. The Partnership pays Uhlmann a share of selling fees when units are sold by its registered brokers. Selling fees of up to 2% of the gross offering proceeds (which includes a 0.50% reallowance to Uhlmann) were charged to partners’ capital upon issuance of Series B Partnership units.

In addition, there is an annual trailing servicing fee of up to 1% of the net asset value of the specific partner’s capital account payable to the soliciting broker-dealer for ongoing investor services. For all Series B units sold, the total trailing servicing fee is not to exceed 7.99% of the gross offering proceeds of the units sold.

The Price Futures Group, Inc. (“PFG”), a related party to the General Partner through common management, and from April 2013 to December ~~2015~~2016, common ownership, acts as the introducing broker for the Partnership, whereby certain accounts of the Partnership are introduced to the Partnership’s clearing broker. A portion of the brokerage fee paid by the Partnership for clearing transactions is paid to Price Futures, by the clearing broker.

F-11

Note 4. Agreements and Related-Party Transactions (continued):

A summary of fees charged by related parties to the Partnership is as follows:

	2015		2014
	2016		2015
Management fees – General Partner	$	8756,~~562~~829	$	~~165~~87,~~291~~562
Trailing servicing fees – Uhlmann		6240,~~967~~283		~~118~~62,~~050~~967

Note 5. Partnership Capital and Withdrawals:

The Partnership accepts contributions as of the close of business on the last business day of each month for investment on the first day of the next succeeding month. The General Partner may accept or reject contributions and waive the minimum contribution amounts in its sole discretion. Effective November 1, 2010, the Partnership began accepting contributions for Series B units. The Partnership has been closed to Series A units contributions since October 31, 2005. Effective May 1, 2013, the Partnership ceased offering its units of limited partnership and is no longer accepting contributions.

Series A and Series B units are identical with respect to participation in the Partnership’s profits or losses. Series B units do not, however, participate in any Partnership recoveries arising out of the bankruptcy of Refco Inc. and its affiliates.

The purchase price of a unit is the net asset value per unit as of the end of each calendar month. Net asset value per unit is calculated as the net asset value at month-end divided by the number of outstanding units.

The Partnership accepts withdrawals on a monthly basis. Requests for withdrawal should be received by the General Partner no later than six business days prior to the end of the month in which an investor chooses to withdraw. Requests for withdrawal should be sent to the General Partner by email, fax, or overnight courier.

F-11

Note 6. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Credit and Market Risk:

The Partnership is involved in trading activities that may have market and/or credit risk. Financial instruments employed in the Partnership’s operations may have market and/or credit risk in excess of the amounts recorded in the statements of financial condition.

Market Risk - Market risks arise from changes in the market value of financial instruments. Theoretically, the Partnership’s exposure is equal to the notional contract value of futures contracts entered. Exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships between financial instruments, and the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the financial instruments are traded. The use of financial instruments may serve to modify or offset market risk associated with other transactions.

Credit Risk - Credit risk arises primarily from the potential inability of counterparties to perform in accordance with the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance is generally the net unrealized gain on the open positions plus the value of the margin or collateral held by the counterparty. Exchange-traded financial instruments generally do not give rise to significant counterparty exposure due to the cash settlement procedures for daily market movements and the margin requirements of individual exchanges. Financial instruments traded off-exchange give rise to the risk of the failure of, or the inability or refusal to perform by, the counterparties to such trades.

Exchange-traded financial instruments generally do not give rise to significant counterparty exposure due to the cash settlement procedures for daily market movements and the margin requirements of individual exchanges. Financial instruments traded off-exchange give rise to the risk of the failure of, or the inability or refusal to perform by, the counterparties to such trades.

Concentration of Credit Risk - The Partnership clears all of its futures trades through one clearing broker, ADM Investor Services, Inc. In the event this counterparty does not fulfill its obligations, the Partnership may be exposed to risk. This risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparties to these transactions.

The Partnership has a substantial portion of its assets on deposit with financial institutions in connection with its cash management activities. In the event of a financial institution’s insolvency, recovery of the Partnership’s assets on deposit may be limited to the amount of insurance or other protection afforded such deposits.

The Partnership attempts to minimize this credit risk by monitoring the creditworthiness of the clearing broker and financial institutions.

F-12

Note 7. Financial Highlights:

Financial highlights for limited partners for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 are as follows:

Per Unit Performance
	Year ended						Year ended
	December 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
	December 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
	Series A			Series B			Series A			Series B
Net asset value per unit at the beginning of the period	$	~~121~~86.7043		$	~~118~~83.3699		$	~~160~~121.3470		$	~~156~~118.4236
Income (loss) from operations:
Net trading gains (losses)		~~(32~~10.~~19)~~70			~~(31~~10.~~24)~~39			(3432.6919)			(3431.1324)
Investment income		0.0518			0.0517			0.0705			0.0705
Expenses		(32.1385)			(32.1884)			(43.0213)			(43.0018)
Net investment loss		(32.0867)			(32.1367)			(3.9508)			(3.9313)
Net gain (loss) per unit		~~(35~~8.~~27)~~03			~~(34~~7.~~37)~~72			(3835.6427)			(3834.0637)
Net asset value per unit at the end of the period	$	8694.4346		$	8391.9971		$	~~121~~86.7043		$	~~118~~83.3699
		Year ended						Year ended
		December 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
		December 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
		Series A			Series B			Series A			Series B
Ratio of net investment loss to average partners’ capital (net assets)(1)		(23.8401)	%		(23.9409)	%		(2.5484)	%		(2.6094)	%
Ratio of expenses to average partners' capital (net assets) (1)(2)		23.8921	%		23.9929	%		2.5889	%		2.6499	%
Total return (3)		~~(28~~9.~~98)~~28	%		~~(29~~9.~~04)~~20	%		(2428.1098)	%		(2429.3304)	%

The above ratios were calculated for the partners taken as a whole. The computation of such ratios was not based on the amount of expenses assessed and income allocated to an individual partner’s capital account, which may vary from these ratios based on the timing of capital transactions and the different fee arrangements (see Note 5).

(1) The ratio of expenses to average partners’ capital (net asset) values does not include brokerage commissions.

F-12

Note 8. Litigation:

The Partnership was a beneficiary of a Litigation Trust which sought recoveries from third parties, related to the 2005 bankruptcy of Refco, Inc. and numerous affiliates (the “Refco Bankruptcy”). In December 2014, the Partnership received additional amounts from the Litigation Trust and sold its interest in any future bankruptcy claims to a third party after giving consideration to such factors as the uncertainty regarding the timing and amount of any future potential distributions. With these final distributions, the Partnership has received the full value of its allowed claims in the Refco bankruptcy as well as excess recoveries of approximately $5.9 million.

All Refco Bankruptcy related recoveries received by the Partnership, including excess recoveries except as described below, have been allocated among all partners in the Partnership who were partners as of October 31, 2005, on a pro-rata basis as of October 31, 2005, with redeemed partners receiving cash distributions. Final cash distributions to redeemed partners from excess recoveries totaled approximately $434,424 for the year ended December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2014, $337,499 of excess Refco related recoveries was payable to redeemed limited partners. All cash distributions were paid out to redeemed investors in December 2015.

The Partnership has reserved $7346,~~012~~883 of the excess Refco related recoveries to apply to expenses incurred to administer ongoing communication with, and distributions and reporting to, redeemed limited partners with respect to Refco related recoveries received by the Partnership. These expenses include but are not limited to professional fees, printing, postage, and administration fees.

F-13

Note 9. Indemnifications:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership enters into contracts and agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties, both of which provide general indemnifications. The Partnership’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Partnership that have not yet occurred. The Partnership expects the risk of any future obligation under these indemnifications to be remote.

Note 10. Subsequent Events:

From January 1, ~~2016~~2017 to March 30, ~~2016~~2017 there were withdrawals from the Partnership totaling $~~349~~91,~~142~~571.

F-1413

2. Supplementary Data

Not required.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Control and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Partnership’s general partner, Beeland Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Partnership has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation was conducted of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission. The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Beeland Management have evaluated the effectiveness of Beeland Management’s internal controls over financial reporting with respect to the Partnership and have concluded that Beeland Management’s internal controls over financial reporting are effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes to internal control or financial reporting procedures during the fourth quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

(a,b) Identification of Directors and Executive Officers

The Partnership has no directors or executive officers. The Partnership is managed by Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., its general partner.

Beeland Management is an Illinois Limited Liability Company formed in 1997 to serve as the general partner of and commodity trading advisor to partnerships and accounts that track the Rogers International Commodity Index. Price Asset Management, Inc. acquired Beeland Management in April 2013. From April 2013 to December 2015, Price Asset Management, Inc. was owned by Price Holdings, Inc. In December 2015, Price Asset Management, Inc. was converted to Price Asset Management, LLC and restructured. Price Asset Management, LLC is no longer owned or controlled by Price Holdings, Inc., but Price Holdings, Inc. continues to retain the option to own a small percentage of Price Asset Management, LLC. Price Asset Management, LLC is a commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor registered with the CFTC.

The managers of Beeland Management are as follows:

Marilyn S. Cleeff, 6364, is the chief financial officer of Beeland Management Company, which she joined in December 2014. Prior to joining Beeland, Ms. Cleeff devoted over 25 years as a senior executive and independent consultant to successful organizations providing client services to the financial industry. Ms. Cleeff has a unique and diverse mix of accounting, audit, regulatory and operations experience that has enabled her to serve as a key resource in the development and control of financial reporting systems for broker-dealers, proprietary trading companies, fund advisors, and fund administrators. Ms. Cleeff was North American Controller of MF Global, Inc. a broker dealer; Chief Financial Officer of Iowa Grain Company, a futures clearing firm; Director of Treasury for Mizuho Securities, Inc. in Chicago; and Managing Director of Spectrum Global Fund

~~firm; Director of Treasury for Mizuho Securities, Inc. in Chicago; and Managing Director of Spectrum Global Fund~~ Administration. Ms. Cleeff holds an M.B.A. from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management and a BS in accounting from the University of Illinois. Ms. Cleeff is a CPA and an NFA principal. Ms. Cleeff is on the board of directors of Reading Power, Inc., a non-profit literacy tutoring program, and the Kellogg Executive Women’s Network.

John D. Reese, 6162, is a manager of Beeland Management Company, which he joined in January 2012. Mr. Reese is also founder and managing partner of Peak View Capital LLC, a private investment firm focused on acquisitions in the asset management industry, which he established in 2010. From January 2008 to March 2010, Mr. Reese was executive managing director and senior vice-president of Wells Fargo Asset Management’s Evergreen Investments division, where he was principally responsible for its investment subsidiary business in North America, European Credit Management Ltd. (“ECM”), a London-based fixed income manager that was acquired by Wachovia Bank in 2007 and then by Wells Fargo in its acquisition of Wachovia Bank in 2008. Prior to Wachovia Bank’s acquisition of ECM, Mr. Reese was president of ECM, Inc., the U.S.-based investment business of ECM, and partner and member of the board of directors of ECM’s parent firm from May 2002 to December 2007. From October 1981 to December 2001, Mr. Reese was employed by Merrill Lynch in a variety of capacities, including most recently as managing director in the Global Debt Markets division in New York. Mr. Reese earned a B.A. in Economics from Westminster College, with continuing study focusing on behavioral finance, portfolio management strategies, and global macro at Harvard’s Kennedy School, University of Chicago’s Booth GSB, Wharton, and MIT. He holds FINRA Series 3, 5, 7, 8, 24, and 63 licenses.

David F. Schink, 4647, is a manager of Beeland Management Company, which he joined in January 2012. Mr. Schink has been listed as a principal and registered as an associated person of the general partner since September 2014. Mr. Schink is also a managing partner of Peak View Capital LLC, which he joined in April 2011. From June 2004 to March 2011, Mr. Schink was chief operating officer and general counsel of Contego Capital Partners, LLC, a Chicago-based registered investment advisor specializing in hedge fund investing where he was involved in strategic and day-to-day business affairs and was responsible for legal and regulatory risk management. From April 2000 to May 2004, Mr. Schink was an associate at Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, where he represented private equity funds, registered investment advisors and other investment vehicles in a variety of transactions, and from October 1998 to March 2000 he was an associate at Sidley & Austin, where he represented financial institutions in structuring and negotiating structured finance and secured lending transactions. Mr. Schink holds a B.A. from Hamilton College and a J.D. from Boston University School of Law.

None.

(d) Family Relationships

None.

(e) Business Experience

See Item 10 (a,b) above.

(f) Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

None.

(g) Code of Ethics

The Partnership has no employees, officers or directors and is managed by it general partner, Beeland Management, which has adopted an Executive Code of Ethics that applies to its principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. A copy of this Executive Code of Ethics may be obtained at no charge by written request to Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., 141 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1320A, Chicago, Illinois 60604 or by calling 312-264-4375.

(h) Audit Committee Financial Expert

Because the Partnership has no employees, officers or directors, it has no audit committee. The Partnership is managed by Beeland Management, its general partner. Marilyn Cleeff serves as the Beeland Management’s “audit committee financial expert.” Ms. Cleeff is not independent of the management of Beeland Management, which is a privately owned limited liability company. Beeland Management has no independent directors.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Partnership pays a monthly management fee to Beeland Management equal to 0.08333% of the average monthly sum of all Capital Accounts contributed by Limited Partners at the close of each month (1.00% per annum). In addition, there is an annual trailing servicing fee of up to 1% of the net asset value of the specific partner’s capital account payable to soliciting broker-dealers for ongoing investor services.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS

(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The Partnership knows of no person who owns beneficially more than 5% of the units. All of the Partnership’s general partner interest is held by Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.

(b) Security Ownership of Management

The Partnership’s affairs are managed by Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. As as general partner~~, Beeland Management Company, L~~.~~L.C. held approximately 1,314 Units in the Partnership as of December 31, 2015, representing approximately 1.5% of the Partnership’s outstanding units as of December 31, 2015.~~

None.

(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

None.

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Price Futures Group, Inc. (“Price Futures Group”) introduces the Partnership’s commodity trading activity to ADMIS, the Partnership’s clearing broker, and receives compensation from ADMIS for doing so.

Uhlmann Price Securities L.L.C. (“Uhlmann”), one of several broker-dealers selling units of the Partnership, receives selling fees when units are sold by its registered brokers and a share of the selling fees when units are sold by other broker-dealers.

The General Partner is wholly owned by Price Asset Management, LLC. Price Asset Management, LLC was formerly affiliated with Price Futures Group and Uhlmann due to the fact that all three entities were 100% owned by Price Holdings, Inc., which in turn is owned, in part, by its employees. In December 2015, Price Asset Management, LLC was restructured and is no longer owned or controlled by Price Holdings, Inc. Certain of the employees of Price Asset Management, LLC were employees of Price Holdings, Inc. and retain some ownership interest and management control as a result.

A summary of fees charged or received by related parties to the Partnership during ~~2015~~2016 is as follows:

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

(1)Audit Fees. Spicer Jeffries LLP anticipates billing the Partnership for professional services rendered for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and billed the Partnership for professional services rendered for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Professional services relate to the audit of the Partnership’s annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in the Partnership’s regulatory quarterly filings and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filings.

2016		$32,500
2015		$32,500
2014		$32,500

(2)Audit-Related Fees. None.

(3)Tax Fees. Spicer Jeffries LLP anticipates billing the Partnership for tax compliance services which relate to the preparation of U.S. and applicable state income tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2016 and billed the Partnership for professional services rendered for the year ended December 31, 2015.

(3)Tax Fees. Spicer Jeffries LLP anticipates billing the Partnership for tax compliance services which relate to the preparation of U.S. and applicable state income tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2015 and billed the Partnership for professional services rendered for the year ended December 31, 2014.


2016		$4,500
2015		$14,500

2015		$14,500
2014		$4,500

(4)All Other Fees. None.

(5)The Managing Members of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. pre-approve the engagement of the Partnership’s auditor for all services to be provided by the auditor and have determined that the payments made for these services are compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence.

(6)Not Applicable.

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)The following documents filed as a part of the report:

(1) Financial Statements:

The following are included with the ~~2015~~2016 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included under Item 8 of this report.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Statements of Financial Condition

Condensed Schedules of Investments

Statements of Operations

Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital

Notes to Financial Statements

(2) Financial statement schedules:

All Schedules are omitted for the reason that they are not required or are not applicable because equivalent information has been included in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

The following exhibits are included herewith.


Designation		Description
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer

32.2		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 30th day of March, 2016.11

ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.

(Registrant)

By: Beeland Management Company, L.L.C.

General Partner

By: /s/David F. Schink

David F. Schink

Manager

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the General Partner of the Registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.

	Title with
Signature	General Partner	Date
/s/David F. Schink	Manager	March 30, ~~2016~~2017
David F. Schink
/s/Marilyn S. Cleeff	Principal Financial and Accounting	March 30, ~~2016~~2017
Marilyn S. Cleeff	Officer

(Being the manager and the principal financial and accounting officer of Beeland Management, LLC.)

Filing Compare · ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND LP