Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Raptor Technology Group, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on August 30, 2007 under the laws of the State of Nevada under the name of Giddy-up Productions, Inc. with planned principal operations in producing motion pictures.

The Company entered into and completed the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Branded Beverages, Inc., and instituted a forward-split of its Common Stock on the basis of twenty-one new Shares of Common Stock for each one Share of Common Stock issued and outstanding on December 15, 2010. As a result of this Merger, the name of the Company was changed to Branded Beverages, Inc. On December 20, 2010, the Company entered into a Rescission of the Agreement and Plan of Merger due to the inability to obtain required financial statements in a timely manner.

In connection with and prior to the above forward-split of the Company’s Common Stock, the principal shareholder of the Company returned and cancelled 6,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon the forward-split of the Company’s common stock on December 15, 2010 the Company had 63,356,538 common shares issued and outstanding.

On January 6, 2011, the Company changed its name to Raptor Technology Group, Inc. and entered into a definitive Plan of Merger and Reorganization with Raptor Fabrication and Equipment, Inc. (“RFEI”). In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, Raptor Technology Group, Inc. is the surviving corporation. The merger was completed on June 30, 2011. Under the terms of and upon the Merger and Reorganization, the Company issued 48,670,000 shares of its common stock for all of the outstanding shares of RFEI and the Company’s former president returned and cancelled 42,000,000 shares of the Company’s. Upon the completion of the Merger and Reorganization, the total number of the Company’s common stocks issued and outstanding was 70,026,538 and RFEI’s shareholders owned approximately 70% of the issued and outstanding shares. The merger between the two companies is being treated for financial reporting purposes as a reverse acquisition whereby RFEI’s operations continue to be reported as if it had actually been the acquirer. The net liabilities of $2,133 of the Company upon the Merger and Reorganization was accounted as a recapitalization and recorded as a reduction to the deficit. Further, the Company adopted the December 31st year-end of RFEI.

The Company currently manufactures multi-feedstock biodiesel production facilities, specializing in modular system packages. The Company provides a scalable commercialization platform for advanced patents in the fields of biofuel and bio-energy production, as well as highly efficient precious metal extraction from mined ores and mine tailings. The Company provides services throughout the United States.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred a loss of $1,134,632 (six months ended June 30, 2010 – a loss of $415,043) and as of June 30, 2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $653,452 (December 31, 2010 – working capital deficit of $362,821). These and other factors raise doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments or classifications that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The management’s plan is to raise additional capital through public equity investment in order to support existing operations and there is no assurance that such additional funds will be available for the Company on acceptable terms, if at all.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2011, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). The Company believes that the disclosures in the unaudited condensed financial statements are adequate to present an overview of the Company’s financial position that is not misleading. The unaudited condensed financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with RFEI’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 which is included in Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 7, 2011.

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the prior period financial statement amounts to the current period presentation for comparative purposes.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed financial statements. We regularly evaluate estimates and judgments based on historical experience and other relevant facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

The Company utilizes the completed contract method of accounting for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue upon the completion of the scope of work required under its contracts, which is when the Company considers amounts to be earned (evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured). Accordingly, monies received or invoices sent for services for which contracts have not been completed have been recorded as deferred revenue. Direct costs, including but not limited to payroll, fuel, equipment rental, transportation expense and strapping costs for contracts which have not been completed are also deferred until the related revenue recognition process is complete. Deferred revenue and related contract costs are netted on a per-job basis. Any anticipated contract losses are accrued. No such accruals are present as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Accounts Receivable, Uncollectible Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are generated from billing on contracts. We carry our accounts receivable at cost less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on our prior experience of collections and existing economic conditions. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no amounts were reserved as uncollectible.

Inventory

Inventory consists of parts and equipment used in its facilities and equipment fabrication business and is stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method of accounting. Costs of inventories include purchase and related costs incurred in bringing the products to their present location and condition. Market value is determined by reference to selling prices after the balance sheet dates or to management's estimates based on prevailing market conditions. The management writes down the inventories to market value if it is below cost. The management also regularly evaluates the composition of its inventories to identify slow-moving and obsolete inventories to determine if a valuation allowance is required.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. We provide for depreciation of property and equipment using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Expenditures for additions, major renewals and betterments are capitalized, and expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged against income as incurred. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The carrying values of long-lived assets, which include property and equipment, are evaluated periodically for impairment. Impairment losses are recognized when indicators of impairment are present and discounted cash flow estimated to be generated by long-lived assets is less than the carrying amount of such assets. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is determined by comparing the amount of long-lived assets to its estimated fair value. No impairment losses have been recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.

Federal Income Taxes

Prior to the merger with RFEI, the Company elected to be taxed as an S Corporation. The election was revoked upon the merger. Subsequent to the merger, income taxes are being accounted for under the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10, formerly SFAS 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes." Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. When it is considered to be more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance is provided for the excess.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic earnings or loss per share (EPS) is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income/loss available to common stockholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. As the Company has incurred net losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company’s potentially dilutive securities included convertible debt that is convertible into 3,944,773 shares of the Company’s common stock were not included in the computation of loss per share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Financial Instruments

The estimated fair values for financial instruments under ASC 825, Financial Instruments, are determined at discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The Company’s financial instruments includes cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, loans payable, note payable, long term debt and derivative liabilities. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

The Company adopted ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:

Level one – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level two – Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

Level three – Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions,

which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a

market participant would use.

For the period ended June 30, 2011, the fair value of cash was measured using Level one inputs and the fair value of derivative liabilities were measured using Level two inputs.

The estimated fair value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, loans payable and note payable approximate their respective carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of long-term debt approximate their carrying value as interest rates on comparable debt have not changed significantly since issuance of the debt.

Convertible Debentures

If the conversion feature of conventional convertible debt provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by the Company as a debt discount pursuant to ASC Topic 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” In those circumstances, the convertible debt will be recorded net of the discount related to the BCF. The Company amortizes the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method.

Derivative Financial Instruments

In the case of non-conventional convertible debt, the Company bifurcates its embedded derivative instruments and records them under the provisions of ASC Topic 815-40 “Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock”. The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of embedded derivatives related to the non-conventional note (“Note”) entered into with Spencer Douglas (see Note 6). The embedded derivative includes the conversion feature of the Note. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the derivative at their fair values as of the inception date of the agreement and at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value will be recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each reporting date. If the fair value of the derivatives is higher at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company will record a non-operating, non-cash charge. If the fair value of the derivatives is lower at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company will record non-operating, non-cash income.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

Liquidity Disclosure [Policy Text Block]

Note 2 – Liquidity

The Company substantially completed three jobs in 2010 for which $2,005,116 has been billed and shown as accounts receivable as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. None of these amounts are due per their contract terms until testing has been completed, which had not occurred as of June 30, 2011. As the Company does not yet have a long history of completing projects and being paid on a predictable timetable, revenues on these jobs will not be recognized until such payments are received. Payments are anticipated to be received during the third quarter of 2011. The Company has funded operations to date from owner financing. Although management is actively seeking third-party funding, it believes that sufficient owner financing is available to fund operations for the next twelve months.

- Definition

Disclosure of accounting policy for reporting when there is a substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time (generally a year from the balance sheet date). Disclose: (a) pertinent conditions and events giving rise to the assessment of substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time, (b) the possible effects of such conditions and events, (c) management's evaluation of the significance of those conditions and events and any mitigating factors, (d) possible discontinuance of operations, (e) management's plans (including relevant prospective financial information), and (f) information about the recoverability or classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classification of liabilities. If management's plans alleviate the substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosure of the principal conditions and events that initially raised the substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern would be expected to be considered. Disclose whether operations for the current or prior years generated sufficient cash to cover current obligations, whether waivers were obtained from creditors relating to the company's default under the provisions of debt agreements and possible effects of such conditions and events, such as: whether there is a possible need to obtain additional financing (debt or equity) or to liquidate certain holdings to offset future cash flow deficiencies. Disclose appropriate parent company information when parent is dependent upon remittances from subsidiaries to satisfy its obligations.

+ Details

- Definition

The entire disclosure for organization, consolidation and basis of presentation of financial statements disclosure.

+ References

Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 720
-SubTopic 15
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2122524

Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 810
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6921930&loc=d3e5614-111684

Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 810
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 8
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6970148&loc=SL6228881-111685

Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Name Statement of Position (SOP)
-Publisher AICPA
-Number 94-6
-Paragraph 10
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 272
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6373374&loc=d3e70478-108055

Reference 6: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6359566&loc=d3e326-107755

Reference 7: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name FASB Staff Position (FSP)
-Number FAS140-4/FIN46(R)-8
-Paragraph 8, C1, C7
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 8: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Name FASB Interpretation (FIN)
-Publisher FASB
-Number 46R
-Paragraph 4, 14, 15
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 9: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 852
-SubTopic 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2209116

Reference 10: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 275
-SubTopic 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2134480

Reference 11: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher AICPA
-Name Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
-Number 51
-Paragraph 2-6
-LegacyDoc This reference is SUPERSEDED by the Accounting Standards Codification effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This reference is included to help users transition from the previous accounting hierarchy and will be removed from future versions of this taxonomy.

Reference 12: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 915
-SubTopic 235
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6472506&loc=d3e38932-110933

Reference 13: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2122150

Reference 14: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 205
-SubTopic 10
-Section 45
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6359553&loc=d3e288-107754

Reference 15: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 235
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 3
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6367646&loc=d3e18780-107790

Reference 16: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 810
-SubTopic 10
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/subtopic&trid=2197480

+ Details

RAPTOR TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. 10-Q/A