UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD ____________ TO ____________

Commission File Number 000-51220

PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


West Virginia	20-0547475
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1775 Sherman Street, Suite 3000, Denver, Colorado 80203

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(303) 860-5800

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such files) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þNo ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

As of June 30, 2010 the Partnership had 899.88 units of limited partnership interest and no units of additional general partnership interest outstanding.

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

INDEX TO REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Condensed Balance Sheets (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Statements of Operations (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)	4
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	24

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	25
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	25
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	25
Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]	25
Item 5.	Other Information	25
Item 6.	Exhibits	26

	SIGNATURES	27

Index

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This periodic report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) regarding PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership’s (the “Partnership’s” or the “Registrant’s”) business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

All statements other than statements of historical facts included in and incorporated by reference into this report are forward-looking statements. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements herein, which include statements of estimated natural gas and oil production and reserves, drilling plans, future cash flows, anticipated liquidity, anticipated capital expenditures and the Managing General Partner Petroleum Development Corporation’s (“PDC’s”) strategies, plans and objectives. However, these words are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements herein. PDC now conducts business under the name “PDC Energy.”

Although forward-looking statements contained in this report reflect the Managing General Partner's good faith judgment, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known to the Managing General Partner. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, including risks and uncertainties incidental to the development, production and marketing of natural gas and oil, and actual outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

changes in production volumes, worldwide demand, and commodity prices for natural gas and oil;

·	changes in estimates of proved reserves;

the timing and extent of the Partnership’s success in further developing and producing the Partnership’s natural gas and oil reserves;

the Managing General Partner’s ability to acquire drilling rigs, supplies and services at reasonable prices;

risks incident to the recompletion and operation of natural gas and oil wells;

future production and well recompletion costs;

the availability of Partnership future cash flows for investor distributions or funding of Well Recompletion Plan activities;

the timing and closing, if consummated, of the proposed merger of the Partnership with and into PDC’s wholly-owned subsidiary, DP 2004 Merger Sub, LLC;

the availability of funding for the consideration payable by PDC and its wholly-owned subsidiary, DP 2004 Merger Sub, LLC to consummate the merger;

the availability of sufficient pipeline and other transportation facilities to carry Partnership production and the impact of these facilities on price;

the effect of existing and future laws, governmental regulations and the political and economic climate of the United States of America, or U.S.;

changes in environmental laws and the regulations and enforcement related to those laws;

the identification of and severity of environmental events and governmental responses to the events;

the effect of natural gas and oil derivatives activities;

conditions in the capital markets; and

losses possible from pending or future litigation.

Further, the Partnership urges the reader to carefully review and consider the cautionary statements made in this report, the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 15, 2010, (“2009 Form 10-K”), and the Partnership’s other filings with the SEC and public disclosures. The Partnership cautions you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Other than as required under the securities laws, the Partnership undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance occurring after the date of this report or currently unknown facts or conditions or the occurrence of unanticipated events.

- 1 -

Index

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)

PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership

Condensed Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009*
Assets

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	197,165		$	197,165
Accounts receivable		84,560			101,158
Oil inventory		16,068			16,430
Due from Managing General Partner-derivatives		252,022			219,167
Due from Managing General Partner-other, net		74,924			170,902
Total current assets		624,739			704,822


Oil and gas properties, successful efforts method, at cost		19,993,869			19,989,720
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization		(10,048,083	)		(9,307,929	)
Oil and gas properties, net		9,945,786			10,681,791

Due from Managing General Partner-derivatives		519,655			219,435
Other assets		18,443			12,682
Total noncurrent assets		10,483,884			10,913,908

Total Assets	$	11,108,623		$	11,618,730

Liabilities and Partners' Equity

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	11,457		$	13,845
Due to Managing General Partner-derivatives		203,453			216,885
Total current liabilities		214,910			230,730

Due to Managing General Partner-derivatives		541,758			625,688
Asset retirement obligations		230,638			223,913
Total liabilities		987,306			1,080,331

Commitments and contingent liabilities

Partners' equity:
Managing General Partner		2,027,905			2,111,321
Limited Partners - 899.88 units issued and outstanding		8,093,412			8,427,078
Total Partners' equity		10,121,317			10,538,399

Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity	$	11,108,623		$	11,618,730

________________________________

*Derived from audited 2009 balance sheet

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

- 2 -

Index

PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership

Condensed Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010		2009
Revenues:
Natural gas and oil sales	$	282,760		$	249,218		$	798,317	$	594,461
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net		136,540			(306,752	)		638,334		(337,712	)
Total revenues		419,300			(57,534	)		1,436,651		256,749

Operating costs and expenses:
Natural gas and oil production costs		90,885			120,455			216,170		253,132
Direct costs - general and administrative		104,749			122,567			140,845		287,243
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		320,639			384,222			740,154		832,616
Accretion of asset retirement obligations		3,388			2,187			6,725		4,374
Total operating costs and expenses		519,661			629,431			1,103,894		1,377,365

(Loss) income from operations		(100,361	)		(686,965	)		332,757		(1,120,616	)

Interest income		-			5,711			-		11,775

Net (loss) income	$	(100,361	)	$	(681,254	)	$	332,757	$	(1,108,841	)

Net (loss) income allocated to partners	$	(100,361	)	$	(681,254	)	$	332,757	$	(1,108,841	)
Less: Managing General Partner interest in net (loss) income		(20,073	)		(136,251	)		66,551		(221,768	)
Net (loss) income allocated to Investor Partners	$	(80,288	)	$	(545,003	)	$	266,206	$	(887,073	)

Net (loss) income per Investor Partner unit	$	(89	)	$	(606	)	$	296	$	(986	)

Investor Partner units outstanding		899.88			899.88			899.88		899.88

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

- 3 -

Index

PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Six months ended June 30,
	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	332,757		$	(1,108,841	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		740,154			832,616
Accretion of asset retirement obligations		6,725			4,374
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative transactions		(430,437	)		910,480
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in accounts receivable		16,598			39,445
Decrease in oil inventory		362			10,491
Increase in other assets		(5,761	)		(6,092	)
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2,388	)		(13,969	)
Decrease in due from Managing General Partner - other, net		95,978			245,274
Net cash provided by operating activities		753,988			913,778

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures for oil and gas properties		(4,149	)		(29,135	)
Proceeds from drilling advance refund from Managing General Partner		-			124,276
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(4,149	)		95,141

Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to Partners		(749,839	)		(883,311	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(749,839	)		(883,311	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		-			125,608
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		197,165			71,549
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	197,165		$	197,157

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

- 4 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

Note 1−General and Basis of Presentation

The PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership was organized as a limited partnership on July 28, 2004, in accordance with the laws of the State of West Virginia for the purpose of engaging in the exploration and development of natural gas and oil properties. Upon completion of the sale of Partnership units on August 4, 2004, the Partnership was funded and commenced its business operations. The Partnership owns natural gas and oil wells located in Colorado, and from the wells, the Partnership produces and sells natural gas and oil.

Purchasers of partnership units subscribed to and fully paid for 12.11 units of limited partner interests and 887.77 units of additional general partner interests at $20,000 per unit. In accordance with the terms of the Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Agreement”), Petroleum Development Corporation, a Nevada Corporation that now conducts business under the name “PDC Energy,” is the Managing General Partner of the Partnership (hereafter, the “Managing General Partner” or “PDC”) and has a 20% Managing General Partner ownership in the Partnership. Upon completion of the drilling phase of the Partnership's wells, all additional general partners units were converted into units of limited partner interests and thereafter became limited partners of the Partnership. Throughout the term of the Partnership, revenues, costs, and cash distributions are allocated 80% to the limited and additional general partners (collectively, the “Investor Partners”), which are shared pro rata based upon the portion of units owned in the Partnership, and 20% to the Managing General Partner.

As of June 30, 2010, there were 665 Investor Partners. As of June 30, 2010 the Managing General Partner has repurchased 15.98 units of the total 899.88 outstanding units of Partnership interests from Investor Partners at an average price of $8,728 per unit and, as a result, participates in the sharing of revenues, costs and cash distributions as both an investor partner and as the Managing General Partner.

The Managing General Partner, under the terms of the Drilling and Operating Agreement (the “D&O Agreement”), has full authority to conduct the Partnership’s business and actively manage the Partnership. The Partnership expects continuing operations of its natural gas and oil properties until such time that the Partnership’s wells are depleted or become uneconomical to produce, at which time that well may be sold or plugged, reclaimed and abandoned. The Partnership’s maximum term of existence extends through December 31, 2055, unless dissolved by certain conditions stipulated within the Agreement which are unlikely to occur at this time, or by written consent of the Investor Partners owning a majority of outstanding units at that time.

On June 7, 2010, the Partnership, the Managing General Partner and its wholly-owned subsidiary, DP 2004 Merger Sub, LLC (“DP Merger Sub”), a Delaware limited liability company, entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”) in which PDC seeks to acquire the Partnership, subject to the vote and approval of the holders of a majority of the limited partnership units held by Investor Partners of the Partnership who are not affiliated with PDC (“third-party Investor Partners”). For more information on the proposed Merger Agreement, see Note 3, Transactions with Managing General Partner and Affiliates−Proposed Merger with PDC and DP 2004 Merger Sub, LLC, which follows. Pending the outcome of the proposed Merger Agreement, the Managing General Partner suspended, as of July 1, 2010, the opportunity for an individual investor partner to request that PDC repurchase their respective limited partnership units.

In the Managing General Partner’s opinion, the accompanying interim unaudited condensed financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the Partnership’s financial statements for interim periods in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC. Accordingly, pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain notes and other financial information included in audited financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The information presented in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Partnership’s 2009 Form 10-K. The Partnership’s accounting policies are described in the Notes to Financial Statements in the Partnership’s 2009 Form 10-K and updated, as necessary, in this Form 10-Q. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, and the cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other future period.

First and Second Quarter 2010 Results of Operations

The Partnerhip’s results for 2010 include an increase to net income of $10,309 primarily as a result of recording additional revenues and a reduction in operating costs in the first quarter of 2010 which should have been recorded as an increase in net income in the fourth quarter of 2009. Additional out-of-period adjustments was recorded in the second quarter of 2010 that decreased net income by $60,500, related to professional fees incurred prior to December 31, 2009 that should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009. Management expects these adjustments to be immaterial to the Partnership’s full 2010 results. Management has also determined these adjustments are immaterial to the Partnership's 2009 financial statements.

- 5 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

Note 2−Recent Accounting Standards

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

In January 2010, the FASB issued changes related to fair value measurements requiring gross presentation of activities within the Level 3 roll forward, whereby entities must present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. This change will be effective for the Partnership’s financial statements issued for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Partnership does not expect adoption of these changes to have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial statements and related disclosures.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Exchange Act Periodic Reports

On July 21, 2010, the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act made permanent the SEC’s non-accelerated filer’s exemption, previously set to expire after December 15, 2010, from compliance with Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or SOX. Therefore, as a non-accelerated filer, the Partnership is permanently exempted from the SOX requirement that SEC registrants provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting by the registrant’s external auditor.

Note 3−Transactions with Managing General Partner and Affiliates

Ongoing Partnership Business and Operations

The Managing General Partner transacts business on behalf of the Partnership under the authority of the D&O Agreement. Revenues and other cash inflows received on behalf of the Partnership are distributed to the Partners net of (after deducting) corresponding operating costs and other cash outflows incurred on behalf of the Partnership. The fair value of the Partnership’s portion of unexpired derivative instruments is recorded on the balance sheet under the captions “Due from Managing General Partner–derivatives,” in the case of net unrealized gains or “Due to Managing General Partner–derivatives,” in the case of net unrealized losses.

The following table presents transactions with the Managing General Partner reflected in the balance sheet line item – Due from (to) Managing General Partner-other, net which remain undistributed or unsettled with the Partnership’s investors as of the dates indicated.

	June 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009

Natural gas and oil sales revenues collected from the Partnership's third-party customers	$	131,459		$	161,879
Commodity Price Risk Management, Realized Gains		16,043			158,936
Other (1)		(72,578	)		(149,913	)
Total Due from Managing General Partner-other, net	$	74,924		$	170,902

(1)	All other unsettled transactions, excluding derivative instruments, between the Partnership and the Managing General Partner. The majority of these are operating costs or general and administrative costs which have not been deducted from distributions.

The following table presents Partnership transactions, excluding derivative transactions which are more fully detailed in Note 5, Derivative Financial Instruments, with the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. “Well operations and maintenance” and “Gathering, compression and processing fees” are included in “Natural gas and oil production costs” on the statements of operations.

- 6 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009

Well operations and maintenance	$	58,889	$	88,031	$	152,566	$	179,529
Gathering, compression and processing fees		16,790		19,313		33,779		42,278
Direct costs - general and administrative		104,749		122,567		140,845		287,243
Cash distributions*		78,978		103,688		160,620		185,000

*Cash distributions include $5,239 and $10,653 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $5,262 and $8,338 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, related to equity cash distributions on Investor Partner units repurchased by PDC.

Proposed Merger with PDC and DP 2004 Merger Sub, LLC

On June 7, 2010, the Partnership, the Managing General Partner and DP Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of PDC, entered into the Merger Agreement subject to the vote and approval of the holders of a majority of the limited partnership units held by third-party Investor Partners as well as the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.

The Merger Agreement has been approved by PDC’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and by the Special Committee formed by the Board, comprised of four non-employee members of PDC’s Board, to represent the interests of the third-party Investor Partners holding limited partnership units. The Board, on behalf of PDC individually, and the Special Committee, on behalf of PDC in its capacity as the Partnership’s Managing General Partner, have determined that the merger is advisable and in the best interests of PDC and the Partnership, respectively, and reasonably believe that the merger is fair to PDC and the third-party Investor Partners in the Partnership, respectively.

Each member of the Special Committee, on behalf of PDC in its capacity as the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, has relied upon his own business judgment and analysis based on a variety of factors in addition to the financial analysis of an outside financial advisor with respect to the fairness to the third-party Investor Partners’ interests from a financial point of view of the consideration to be received by the third-party Investor Partners pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Also, the Special Committee retained its own legal counsel to advise it regarding the terms of the proposed merger. The Special Committee has recommended that the third-party Investor Partners vote for the limited partnership amendment and the Merger Agreement.

If approved by the third-party Investor Partners and completed, the merger will be retrospectively effective as of May 1, 2010, the separate existence of the Partnership will terminate and the third-party Investor Partner’s will receive a cash payment in the amount of $5,650 per limited partnership unit, less the sum of all per unit cash distributions made after June 30, 2010 and before the transaction closes. Additionally, DP Merger Sub shall be the surviving entity of the merger and shall be wholly-owned by PDC, and the limited partners will have no continuing interest in the Partnership, since the Partnership will cease as a separate business entity.

The Merger Agreement among the Partnership, PDC and its subsidiary DP Merger Sub, may be terminated, and the merger abandoned:

should all parties agree by mutual consent to terminate the agreement;

by any party thereto, should the proposed merger not occur by December 31, 2010;

by any party thereto, should consummation of the merger become illegal or be otherwise prohibited by law or regulation;

by any party thereto, should any suit or action be pending against parties to the agreement challenging the legality or any aspect of the merger transaction;

- 7 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

by the Special Committee, on behalf of the Partnership and prior to approval by third-party Investor Partners, should the Special Committee believe it has received a superior offer that is more favorable to the third-party Investor Partners; or

by PDC or the Partnership, should either PDC or the Partnership fail to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement and such failure has a non-curable material adverse effect on the PDC or the Partnership, respectively, or materially and adversely affects the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

Closing of the merger is conditioned on approval by a majority vote of third-party Investor Partners on both proposals to (1) amend the limited partnership agreement to expressly provide third-party Investor Partners the right to approve merger transactions and (2) approve the Merger Agreement, described above. On July 14, 2010, the Partnership filed a Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to the merger with the SEC. Although there is no assurance of the likelihood or timing of the merger transaction, upon clearance by the SEC, a definitive proxy statement will be mailed to the Partnership’s limited partners. After approval by a majority vote of third-party Investor Partners and the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretaries of State of West Virginia and Delaware, no additional filing or registration with, notification to, or authorization, consent or approval of, any governmental entity will be required in connection with the execution and delivery of the Merger Agreement by the Partnership, PDC or DP Merger Sub or the consummation by the Partnership, PDC or DP Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated thereby. Following consummation of the merger, the Partnership will no longer be required to file reports with the SEC, and the third-party Investor Partners will no longer participate in the Partnership’s future earnings or growth.

Regardless of whether the merger is consummated, all costs and expenses incurred by PDC, the Partnership and DP Merger Sub in connection with the merger agreement, shall be paid by PDC.

Note 4−Fair Value Measurements

Derivative Financial Instruments. The Partnership measures fair value based upon quoted market prices, where available. The valuation determination includes: (1) identification of the inputs to the fair value methodology through the review of counterparty statements and other supporting documentation, (2) determination of the validity of the source of the inputs, (3) corroboration of the original source of inputs through access to multiple quotes, if available, or other information and (4) monitoring changes in valuation methods and assumptions. The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of future fair values. The valuation determination also gives consideration to nonperformance risk on Partnership liabilities in addition to nonperformance risk on PDC’s own business interests and liabilities, as well as the credit standing of derivative instrument counterparties. The Managing General Partner primarily uses financial institutions, who are also major lenders in PDC’s credit facility agreement, as counterparties to the Partnership’s derivative contracts. The Managing General Partner has evaluated the credit risk of the counterparties holding the Partnership’s derivative assets using relevant credit market default rates, giving consideration to amounts outstanding for each counterparty and the duration of each outstanding derivative position. Based on the Managing General Partner’s evaluation, as of June 30, 2010, the impact of nonperformance risk on the fair value of the Partnership’s derivative assets and liabilities was not significant. Validation of the Partnership’s contracts’ fair values are performed internally and while the Managing General Partner uses common industry practices to develop valuation techniques, changes in the Managing General Partner’s pricing methodologies or the underlying assumptions could result in significantly different fair values. While the Managing General Partner believes these valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those used by other market participants, the use of different methodologies, or assumptions, to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value.

- 8 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

The following table presents, by hierarchy level, the Partnership’s derivative financial instruments, including both current and non-current portions measured at fair value.

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets			Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 1)			(Level 3)			Total

As of December 31, 2009
Assets:
Commodity based derivatives	$	221,143		$	217,459		$	438,602
Total assets		221,143			217,459			438,602

Liabilities:
Commodity based derivatives		(16,231	)		(32,805	)		(49,036	)
Basis protection derivative contracts		-			(793,537	)		(793,537	)
Total liabilities		(16,231	)		(826,342	)		(842,573	)

Net asset (liability)	$	204,912		$	(608,883	)	$	(403,971	)

As of June 30, 2010
Assets:
Commodity based derivatives	$	691,391		$	80,286		$	771,677
Total assets		691,391			80,286			771,677

Liabilities:
Commodity based derivatives		-			(17,755	)		(17,755	)
Basis protection derivative contracts		-			(727,456	)		(727,456	)
Total liabilities		-			(745,211	)		(745,211	)

Net asset (liability)	$	691,391		$	(664,925	)	$	26,466

The following table presents the changes of the Partnership’s Level 3 derivative financial instruments measured on a recurring basis:

	Six months ended
	June 30, 2010
Fair value, net liability, as of December 31, 2009	$	(608,883	)
Changes in fair value included in statement of operations line item:
Commodity price risk management, net		75,898
Settlements		(131,940	)
Fair value, net liability, as of June 30, 2010	$	(664,925	)

Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets (liabilities) still held as of June 30, 2010 included in statement of operations line item:
Commodity price risk management, net	$	55,725

See Note 5, Derivative Financial Instruments, for additional disclosure related to the Partnership’s derivative financial instruments.

Non-Derivative Assets and Liabilities. The carrying values of the financial instruments comprising current assets and current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

- 9 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

Note 5−Derivative Financial Instruments

As of June 30, 2010, the Partnership had derivative instruments, comprised of commodity collars, commodity fixed-price swaps and basis protection swaps, in place for a portion of its anticipated production through 2013 for a total of 622,870 MMbtu of natural gas and 4,570 Bbls of oil. Partnership policy prohibits the use of natural gas and oil derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

The following table summarizes the line item and fair value amounts of the Partnership’s derivative instruments in the accompanying balance sheets.

			Fair Value
		Balance Sheet	June 30,			December 31,
Derivative instruments not designated as hedge (1):		Line Item	2010			2009

Derivative Assets:	Current
	Commodity contracts	Due from Managing General Partner-derivatives	$	252,022		$	219,167

	Non Current
	Commodity contracts	Due from Managing General Partner-derivatives		519,655			219,435


Total Derivative Assets			$	771,677		$	438,602

Derivative Liabilities:	Current
	Commodity contracts	Due to Managing General Partner-derivatives	$	(8,182	)	$	(16,640	)

	Basis protection contracts	Due to Managing General Partner-derivatives		(195,271	)		(200,245	)
	Non Current
	Commodity contracts	Due to Managing General Partner-derivatives		(9,573	)		(32,397	)

	Basis protection contracts	Due to Managing General Partner-derivatives		(532,185	)		(593,291	)

Total Derivative Liabilities			$	(745,211	)	$	(842,573	)

(1) As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, none of the Partnership’s derivative instruments were designated as hedges.

- 10 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

The following table summarizes the impact of the Partnership’s derivative instruments on the Partnership’s accompanying statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

	Three months ended June 30,
	2010							2009
Statement of operations line item	Reclassification of Realized Gains (Losses) Included in Prior Periods Unrealized			Realized and Unrealized Gains For the Current Period		Total		Reclassification of Realized Gains (Losses) Included in Prior Periods Unrealized			Realized and Unrealized Losses For the Current Period			Total

Commodity price risk management, net
Realized gains (losses)	$	18,019		$	3,010	$	21,029	$	245,355		$	(16,806	)	$	228,549
Unrealized (losses) gains		(18,019	)		133,530		115,511		(245,355	)		(289,946	)		(535,301	)
Total commodity price risk management gain (loss), net	$	-		$	136,540	$	136,540	$	-		$	(306,752	)	$	(306,752	)

	Six months ended June 30,
	2010							2009
Statement of operations line item	Reclassification of Realized Gains (Losses) Included in Prior Periods Unrealized			Realized and Unrealized Gains For the Current Period		Total		Reclassification of Realized Gains (Losses) Included in Prior Periods Unrealized			Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) For the Current Period			Total

Commodity price risk management, net
Realized gains	$	111,697		$	96,200	$	207,897	$	455,381		$	117,387		$	572,768
Unrealized (losses) gains		(111,697	)		542,134		430,437		(455,381	)		(455,099	)		(910,480	)
Total commodity price risk management gain (loss), net	$	-		$	638,334	$	638,334	$	-		$	(337,712	)	$	(337,712	)

Concentration of Credit Risk. A significant component of the Partnership’s future liquidity is concentrated in derivative instruments that enables the Partnership to manage a portion of its exposure to price volatility from producing natural gas and oil. These arrangements expose the Partnership to the risk of nonperformance by the counterparties. The Managing General Partner primarily uses financial institutions, who are also major lenders in the Managing General Partner’s credit facility agreement, as counterparties to the derivative contracts. To date, the Partnership has experienced no counterparty defaults.

Note 6−Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental

Due to the nature of the natural gas and oil business, the Partnership is exposed to environmental risks. The Managing General Partner has various policies and procedures to avoid environmental contamination and mitigate the risks from environmental contamination. The Managing General Partner conducts periodic reviews to identify changes in the Partnership’s environmental risk profile. Liabilities are accrued when environmental assessments and/or clean-ups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. The Managing General Partner has evaluated this liability, for costs which might exceed the environmental-related expenditures that have been incurred and recorded at June 30, 2010, and determined it to be immaterial to the Partnership as of June 30, 2010. The Managing General Partner is not aware of any environmental claims existing as of June 30, 2010, which have not been provided for or would otherwise have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial statements. However, there can be no assurance that current regulatory requirements will not change or unknown past non-compliance with environmental laws will not be discovered on the Partnership’s properties.

- 11 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010

(unaudited)

On December 8, 2008, the Managing General Partner received a Notice of Violation/Cease and Desist Order (the “Notice”) from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (the “CDPHE”), related to the stormwater permit for the Garden Gulch Road. The Managing General Partner manages this private road for Garden Gulch LLC. The Managing General Partner is one of eight users of this road, all of which are oil and gas companies operating in the Piceance Basin of Colorado. Operating expenses, including amounts arising from this notice, if any, are allocated among the users of the road based upon their respective usage. The Partnership has seven wells in this region. The Notice alleges a deficient and/or incomplete stormwater management plan, failure to implement best management practices and failure to conduct required permit inspections. The Notice requires corrective action and states that the recipient shall cease and desist such alleged violations. The Notice states that a violation could result in civil penalties up to $10,000 per day. The Managing General Partner’s responses were submitted on February 6, 2009, and April 8, 2009. Commencing in December 2009, the Managing General Partner entered negotiations with the CDPHE regarding this notice and continues to work to bring this matter to closure. Given the inherent uncertainty in administrative actions of this nature, the Managing General Partner is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this administrative action at this time and therefore no amounts have been recorded on the Partnership’s financial records.

Derivative Contracts

The Partnership is exposed to the effect of market fluctuations in the prices of natural gas and oil. The Managing General Partner employs established policies and procedures to manage the risks associated with these market fluctuations by utilizing derivative instruments. Should the counterparties to the Managing General Partner's derivative instruments not perform, the Partnership's exposure to market fluctuations in commodity prices would increase significantly. The Managing General Partner and the Partnership have had no counterparty defaults.

- 12 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Partnership Overview

PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership engages in the development, production and sale of natural gas and oil. The Partnership began natural gas and oil operations in August 2004 and currently operates 23 gross (20.3 net) wells located in the Rocky Mountain Region in the state of Colorado. Of the Partnership’s total well count, 22 are producing and one Wattenberg Field well is not producing due to operational issues. The Managing General Partner markets the Partnership’s natural gas production to commercial end users, interstate or intrastate pipelines or local utilities, primarily under market sensitive contracts in which the price of natural gas sold varies as a result of market forces. PDC does not charge an additional fee for the marketing of the natural gas and oil because these services are covered by the monthly well operating charge. PDC, on behalf of the Partnership in accordance with the D&O Agreement, is authorized to enter into multi-year fixed price contracts or utilize derivatives, including collars, swaps or basis protection swaps, in order to offset some or all of the commodity price variability for particular periods of time. Seasonal factors, such as effects of weather on prices received and costs incurred, and availability of pipeline capacity, owned by PDC or other third parties, may impact the Partnership's results. In addition, both sales volumes and prices tend to be affected by demand factors with a seasonal component. The Partnership’s wells will produce until they are depleted or until they are uneconomical to produce; however, Partnership well recompletions in the Codell formation of Wattenberg Field wells, may provide for additional reserve development and production.

Well Recompletion Plan

The Managing General Partner has developed a plan to initiate recompletion activities during 2011. This plan includes notifying investor partners that in October 2010, funds to begin these recompletions may be withheld from future distributable cash flows of the Partnership resulting from both current production and any increased production due to recompletion activities. The funds retained that are necessary for the Partnership to pay for recompletion costs will materially reduce, up to 100%, distributable cash flows for a period of time not to exceed five years. If any or all of the Partnership’s Wattenberg wells are not recompleted, the Partnership will experience a reduction in proved reserves currently assigned to these wells. Both the number of recompletions and the timing of recompletions will be based on the availability of cash withheld from Partnership distributions. The Managing General Partner believes that, based on projected recompletion costs and projected cash withholding, all partnership recompletions will be completed within a five year period. Current estimated costs for these well recompletions are between $150,000 and $200,000 per recompletion. This Partnership potentially has 14 well recompletion opportunities. Total withholding for these activities from the Partnership’s distributable cash flows is estimated to total between $2.1 million and $2.8 million. The Managing General Partner will re-evaluate the feasibility of commencing any or all of these recompletion opportunities based on engineering data and a favorable commodity price environment in order to maximize the financial benefit of the recompletion.

Implementation of the Well Recompletion Plan would reduce or eliminate Partnership distributions to investors while the work is being conducted and paid for. Depending upon the level of withholding and the results of operations, it is possible that investors could have taxable income from the Partnership without any corresponding distributions in the future. Investor Partners are urged to consult a tax advisor to determine all of the relevant federal, state and local tax consequences of the Well Recompletion Plan. The above discussion is not intended as a substitute for careful tax planning, and third-party Investor Partners should depend upon the advice of their own tax advisors concerning the effects of the Well Recompletion Plan.

Proposed Merger with PDC and DP 2004 Merger Sub, LLC

- 13 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

If approved by the third-party Investor Partners and completed, the merger will be retrospectively effective as of May 1, 2010, the separate existence of the Partnership will terminate and the third-party Investor Partner’s will receive a cash payment in the amount of $5,650 per limited partnership unit, less the sum of all per unit cash distributions made after June 30, 2010and before the transaction closes. Additionally, DP Merger Sub shall be the surviving entity of the merger and shall be wholly-owned by PDC, and the limited partners will have no continuing interest in the Partnership, since the Partnership will cease as a separate business entity.

The Merger Agreement among the Partnership, PDC and its subsidiary DP Merger Sub, may be terminated, and the merger abandoned:

should all parties agree by mutual consent to terminate the agreement;

by any party thereto, should the proposed merger not occur by December 31, 2010;

by any party thereto, should consummation of the merger become illegal or be otherwise prohibited by law or regulation;

by any party thereto, should any suit or action be pending against parties to the agreement challenging the legality or any aspect of the merger transaction;

- 14 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Regardless of whether the merger is consummated, all costs and expenses incurred by PDC, the Partnership and DP Merger Sub in connection with the merger agreement, shall be paid by PDC.

The exchange by a third-party Investor Partner of limited partnership units for cash pursuant to the merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The effects of the merger may be different for each investor partner. Third-party Investor Partners are urged to consult a tax advisor to determine all of the relevant federal, state and local tax consequences of the potential Merger Agreement. The above discussion is not intended as a substitute for careful tax planning, and third-party Investor Partners should depend upon the advice of their own tax advisors concerning the effects of the potential merger.

On July 1, 2010, the Managing General Partner suspended the opportunity for an individual third-party Investor Partner to request that PDC repurchase their respective limited partnership units under the terms of the program, pending the outcome of the proposed Merger Agreement.

The Managing General Partner, PDC, can provide no assurance that the proposed merger of the Partnership with and into PDC’s wholly-owned subsidiary DP Merger Sub, will be approved by third-party Investor Partners or that the other conditions to the completion of the merger will be satisfied or that the merger will ever be consummated. If the merger is not completed, the anticipated third-party Investor Partner merger benefits that include unit liquidity and elimination of Schedule K-1 tax reports in the Partnership will not be realized and the Partnership will continue the existing business plan to optimally develop and cost-effectively operate the Partnership’s natural gas and oil reserves. This plan would encompass the finalization and implementation of the Well Completion Plan, more fully outlined above.

Partnership Operating Results Overview

Natural gas and oil sales increased 34% or $0.2 million for the first six months of 2010 compared to the first six months of 2009, even though production volumes decreased 21% period-to-period. This increase was driven primarily by the improved commodity price environment and the increase in the Partnership’s oil production as a percentage of total production. The average sales price per Mcfe, excluding the impact of realized derivative gains, was $5.45 for the current year period compared to $3.22 for the same period a year ago. Realized derivative gains from natural gas and oil sales contributed an additional $1.43 per Mcfe or $0.2 million to the first six months of 2010 total revenues. Comparatively, the total per Mcfe price realized, consisting of the average sales price and realized derivative gains, increased to $6.88 for the current year six months from $6.32 for the same prior year period.

The increase in total revenues did not have a corresponding impact on costs and expenses as natural gas and oil production and well operations costs and general and administrative expense decreased by $0.2 million for the current year six months compared to the same prior year period. The decrease is primarily due to a reduction in professional fees in the 2010 period compared to the 2009 period.

- 15 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Results of Operations

The following table presents selected information regarding the Partnership’s results of operations.

	Three months ended June 30,							Six months ended June 30,
	2010		2009		Change			2010		2009		Change
Number of producing wells (end of period)		22		23		-			22		23		-

Production (1)
Natural gas (Mcf)		58,321		71,776		-19	%		121,560		159,319		-24	%
Oil (Bbl)		1,557		1,857		-16	%		4,133		4,213		-2	%
Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe) (2)		67,663		82,918		-18	%		146,358		184,597		-21	%

Natural Gas and Oil Sales
Natural gas	$	176,614	$	149,796		18	%	$	504,909	$	413,598		22	%
Oil		106,146		99,422		7	%		293,408		180,863		62	%
Total natural gas and oil sales	$	282,760	$	249,218		13	%	$	798,317	$	594,461		34	%

Realized Gain on Derivatives, net
Natural gas	$	3,123	$	186,065		-98	%	$	173,218	$	465,805		-63	%
Oil		17,906		42,484		-58	%		34,679		106,963		-68	%
Total realized gain on derivatives, net	$	21,029	$	228,549		-91	%	$	207,897	$	572,768		-64	%

Average Selling Price (excluding realized gain on derivatives)
Natural gas (per Mcf)	$	3.03	$	2.09		45	%	$	4.15	$	2.60		60	%
Oil (per Bbl)		68.17		53.54		27	%		70.99		42.93		65	%
Natural gas equivalents (per Mcfe)		4.18		3.01		39	%		5.45		3.22		69	%

Average Selling Price (including realized gain on derivatives)
Natural gas (per Mcf)	$	3.08	$	4.68		-34	%	$	5.58	$	5.52		1	%
Oil (per Bbl)		79.67		76.42		4	%		79.38		68.32		16	%
Natural gas equivalents (per Mcfe)		4.49		5.76		-22	%		6.88		6.32		9	%

Average Lifting Cost (per Mcfe) (3)	$	1.34	$	1.45		-7	%	$	1.48	$	1.37		8	%

Operating costs and expenses
Direct costs - general and administrative	$	104,749	$	122,567		-15	%	$	140,845	$	287,243		-51	%
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	$	320,639	$	384,222		-17	%	$	740,154	$	832,616		-11	%

Cash distributions	$	368,696	$	492,132		-25	%	$	749,839	$	883,311		-15	%

_______________

(1)

Production is determined by multiplying the gross production volume of properties in which the Partnership has an interest by the percentage of the leasehold or other property interest the Partnership owns.

(2)

A ratio of energy content of natural gas and oil (six Mcf of natural gas equals one Bbl of oil) was used to obtain a conversion factor to convert oil production into equivalent Mcf of natural gas.

(3)

Production costs represent natural gas and oil operating expenses which include production taxes.

Definitions used throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:

Bbl – One barrel or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume

MBbl – One thousand barrels

Mcf – One thousand cubic feet

MMcf – One million cubic feet

Mcfe – One thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalents

MMcfe – One million cubic feet of natural gas equivalents

MMbtu – One million British Thermal Units

- 16 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Natural Gas and Oil Sales

Six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to six months ended June 30, 2009

The $0.2 million, or 34% increase in total sales for the 2010 six month period as compared to the prior year period, was primarily a reflection of the significantly higher average sales price per Mcfe of 69%, which was partially offset by a production volume decrease of 21%. The average sales price per Mcfe, excluding the impact of realized derivative gains, was $5.45 for the current year six month period compared to $3.22 for the same period a year ago.

The increase in natural gas revenues of 22% contrasts to the more significant increase in oil revenues of 62%. Although both natural gas and oil commodity prices rose substantially, the Partnership’s oil revenue increase was partially offset by marginally lower oil production volumes, per Bbl of 2% as compared to the more significant decline in natural gas production volumes, per Mcf of 24% during the current six month period.

Three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to three months ended June 30, 2009

The $34,000, or 13% increase in total sales for the 2010 second quarter as compared to the prior year second quarter was primarily a reflection of the higher average sales price per Mcfe of 39%, which was partially offset by production volume decrease of 18%. Average sales prices per Mcfe, excluding the impact of realized derivative gains, were $4.18 for the current year quarter compared to $3.01 for the same quarter a year ago.

The Partnership expects to experience declines in both natural gas and oil production volumes over the wells’ life cycles until such time that the Partnership’s Wattenberg wells may be successfully recompleted. Subsequent to a successful recompletion, production will once again be expected to decline.

Natural Gas and Oil Pricing

Financial results depend upon many factors, particularly the price of natural gas and oil and on PDC’s ability to market the Partnership’s production effectively. Natural gas and oil prices are among the most volatile of all commodity prices. This price volatility has a material impact on the Partnership’s financial results. Natural gas and oil prices also vary by region and locality, depending upon the distance to markets, and the supply and demand relationships in that region or locality and availability of sufficient pipeline capacity. This can be especially true in the Rocky Mountain Region. The combination of increased drilling activity and the lack of local markets have resulted in local market oversupply situations from time to time. Like most producers in the region, the Partnership relies on major interstate pipeline companies to construct these pipelines to increase capacity, rendering the timing and availability of these facilities and transportation capacity beyond the Partnership’s control. Oil pricing, unlike natural gas pricing, is driven predominantly by global supply and demand relationships.

The price at which PDC markets the natural gas produced in the Rocky Mountain Region by the Partnership is based on a variety of prices, which primarily includes natural gas sold at Colorado Interstate Gas, or CIG, prices with a portion sold at Mid-Continent, San Juan Basin, Southern California or other nearby regional prices. The CIG Index, and other indices for production delivered to Rocky Mountain pipelines, has historically been less than the price received for natural gas produced in the eastern regions, which is primarily New York Mercantile Exchange, or NYMEX, based, because of the lack of interstate transmission capacity which moved Rocky Mountain natural gas production to Northeastern U.S. industrial and heating markets. This negative differential has narrowed in the last year and is lower than historical variances. This negative differential between NYMEX and CIG averaged $1.13 and $1.38 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and narrowed to an average of $0.48 and $0.32 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.

- 17 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Commodity Price Risk Management, Net

The Managing General Partner is authorized to utilize natural gas and oil derivative instruments to manage price risk for PDC as well as sponsored drilling partnerships. Commodity price risk management, net includes realized gains and losses and unrealized changes in the fair value of derivative instruments related to the Partnership’s natural gas and oil production. The Managing General Partner sets these instruments for PDC, and the various partnerships managed by PDC. Derivative financial instrument positions taken by the Managing General Partner on the Partnership’s behalf, are specifically designated to the Partnership’s production volumes. See Note 4, Fair Value Measurements and Note 5, Derivative Financial Instruments, to the Partnership’s unaudited condensed financial statements included in this report, for additional details on the Partnership’s derivative financial instruments.

The following table presents the realized and unrealized derivative gains and losses included in commodity price risk management gain (loss), net.

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net	2010			2009			2010			2009
Realized gains
Oil	$	17,906		$	42,484		$	34,679		$	106,963
Natural Gas		3,123			186,065			173,218			465,805
Total realized gain, net		21,029			228,549			207,897			572,768

Unrealized gains (losses)
Reclassification of realized gains included in prior periods unrealized		(18,019	)		(245,355	)		(111,697	)		(455,381	)
Unrealized gain (loss) for the period		133,530			(289,946	)		542,134			(455,099	)
Total unrealized gain (loss), net		115,511			(535,301	)		430,437			(910,480	)
Commodity price risk management gain (loss), net	$	136,540		$	(306,752	)	$	638,334		$	(337,712	)

Six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to six months ended June 30, 2009

The realized derivative gains for the 2010 six month period were $0.2 million. These realized gains were primarily a result of lower natural gas and oil spot prices at settlement compared to the respective strike price, offset in part by realized losses due to the basis differential between NYMEX and CIG being narrower than the strike price of the derivative position. For the six month period, realized gains related to natural gas and oil derivatives were $0.3 million and realized losses on the Partnership’s CIG basis swaps were $0.1 million. Unrealized gains on the Partnership’s natural gas and oil positions for the six months period were $0.5 million due primarily to a downward shift in the natural gas and oil forward curves.

For the 2009 six month period, the Partnership realized significant derivative gains as a result of lower natural gas and oil prices at settlement compared to the respective derivative strike prices. Unrealized losses for the period were primarily related to oil swaps, as the forward strip price of oil rebounded during the period, and the CIG basis swaps, as the forward basis differential during the period between NYMEX and CIG continued to narrow from the strike price of the derivative position.

Three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to three months ended June 30, 2009

The realized derivative gains for the 2010 second quarter were approximately $21,000. These realized gains are a result of lower natural gas and oil spot prices at settlement compared to the respective strike price, offset in part by realized losses due to the basis differential between NYMEX and CIG being narrower than the strike price of the derivative position. For the quarter, realized gains related to natural gas and oil derivatives were $0.1 million and realized losses on the Partnership’s CIG basis swaps were $0.1 million. For the 2010 second quarter, the unrealized gains were primarily related to the oil positions, as the forward strip price shifted downward during the quarter, and the widening of the NYMEX-CIG basis differential. Unrealized gains on the Partnership’s CIG basis swaps for the 2010 second quarter was $0.1 million.

- 18 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

For the 2009 second quarter, the Partnership realized significant derivative gains as a result of lower natural gas and oil prices at settlement compared to the respective derivative strike prices. Unrealized losses for the period were primarily related to oil swaps, as the forward strip price of oil rebounded during the period, and the CIG basis swaps, as the forward basis differential during the period between NYMEX and CIG continued to narrow from the strike price of the derivative position.

Natural Gas and Oil Sales Derivative Instruments. The Managing General Partner on behalf of the Partnership in accordance with the D&O Agreement, is authorized to utilize various derivative instruments to manage volatility in natural gas and oil prices. The Partnership has in place a series of collars, fixed-price swaps and basis swaps on a portion of the Partnership’s natural gas and oil production. See Note 5, Derivative Financial Instruments to the Partnership’s financial statements included in the 2009 Form 10-K for an additional discussion on how each derivative type impacts the Partnership’s cash flows.

The following table presents the Partnership’s derivative positions in effect as of June 30, 2010.

	Collars						Fixed-Price Swaps				CIG Basis Protection Swaps
Commodity/ Index	Quantity (Gas-Mmbtu)		Weighted Average Contract Price				Quantity (Gas-Mmbtu Oil-Bbls)		Weighted Average Contract Price		Quantity (Gas-Mmbtu)		Weighted Average Contract Price			Fair Value at June 30, 2010(1)
Commodity/ Index	Quantity (Gas-Mmbtu)		Floors		Ceilings		Quantity (Gas-Mmbtu Oil-Bbls)		Weighted Average Contract Price		Quantity (Gas-Mmbtu)		Weighted Average Contract Price			Fair Value at June 30, 2010(1)

Natural Gas
CIG
10/01 - 12/31/2010		14,818	$	4.75	$	9.45		-	$	-		-	$	-		$	9,044
01/01 - 03/31/2011		22,227		4.75		9.45		-		-		-		-			11,076

NYMEX
07/01 - 09/30/2010		-		-		-		51,368		5.56		51,361		(1.88	)		(13,544	)
10/01 - 12/31/2010		6,118		5.75		8.30		29,530		6.09		35,551		(1.88	)		(1,463	)
01/01 - 03/31/2011		8,316		5.75		8.30		16,547		6.82		24,863		(1.88	)		(3,620	)
04/01 - 06/30/2011		-		-		-		47,323		6.78		47,323		(1.88	)		16,851
07/01 - 12/31/2011		-		-		-		92,527		6.76		92,527		(1.88	)		1,500
2012-2013		12,198		6.00		8.27		321,898		7.05		334,097		(1.88	)		(14,028	)
Total Natural Gas		63,677						559,193				585,722					5,816

Oil
NYMEX
07/01 - 09/30/2010		-		-		-		1,210		92.96		-		-			20,011
10/01 - 12/31/2010		-		-		-		1,210		92.96		-		-			18,395
01/01 - 03/31/2011		-		-		-		522		70.75		-		-			(3,833	)
04/01 - 06/30/2011		-		-		-		534		70.75		-		-			(4,350	)
07/01 - 12/31/2011		-		-		-		1,094		70.75		-		-			(9,573	)
Total Oil		-						4,570				-					20,650

Total Natural Gas and Oil																$	26,466

(1) Approximately 10% of the fair value of the Partnership’s derivative assets and all of the Partnership’s derivative liabilities were measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), see Note 4, Fair Value Measurements, to the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements included in this report.

Natural Gas and Oil Production Costs

Generally, natural gas and oil production costs vary with changes in total natural gas and oil sales and production volumes. Production taxes are estimates by the Managing General Partner based on tax rates determined using published information. These estimates are subject to revision based on actual amounts determined during future filings by the Managing General Partner with the taxing authorities. Production taxes vary directly with total natural gas and oil sales. Transportation costs vary directly with production volumes. Fixed monthly well operating costs increase on a per unit basis as production decreases per the historical decline curve. In addition, general oil field services and all other costs vary and can fluctuate based on services required. These costs include water hauling and disposal, equipment repairs and maintenance, snow removal and service rig workovers.

- 19 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to six months ended June 30, 2009

For the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, natural gas and oil production, on an energy equivalency-basis, decreased 21%, which reflects in part, the normally-occurring production declines throughout a natural gas and oil well’s production life cycle. Additionally, Grand Valley Field well equipment constraints, which will require well workovers of three Partnership wells, also contributed to the Partnership’s significantly lower production volumes during the current period. Production and operating costs were lower by approximately $37,000, or 15%, primarily due to the Managing General Partner’s cost-cutting initiatives that reduced lease operating costs. These costs were partially offset by higher 2010 well operations costs as a result of the increase in the per well operations fee charged by the Managing General Partner, consistent with the terms of the D&O Agreement. Production and operating costs per Mcfe were $1.48 for the six months ended June 30 of 2010 compared to $1.37 for the comparable period in 2009.

Three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to three months ended June 30, 2009

For the quarter ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, natural gas and oil production on an energy equivalency-basis, decreased 18%, primarily as a result of Grand Valley wells reduced performance noted above and expected normally-occurring production life-cycle decline in both operating fields. Production and operating costs were lower by approximately $30,000, or 25% due to the lower lease operating expenses that were partially offset by higher well operations fees, described above. Production and operating costs per Mcfe were $1.34 and $1.45 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Direct Costs−General and Administrative

Six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to six months ended June 30, 2009

Direct costs – general and administrative consist primarily of professional fees for financial statement audits, income tax return preparation, independent engineer’s reserve reports and legal matters. Direct costs decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, by approximately, $0.1 million principally due to reduced billings for professional services. This amount includes the second quarter 2010 recording of an out of period adjustment of $60,500, for professional services that should have been recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to three months ended June 30, 2009

Direct costs – general and administrative consist primarily of professional fees for financial statement audits, income tax return preparation, independent engineer’s reserve reports and legal matters. Direct costs decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, by approximately $18,000 principally due to reduced billings for professional services. This amount includes the recording of an out of period adjustment of $60,500, for professional services that should have been recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization

DD&A expense related to natural gas and oil properties is directly related to production volumes for the period. For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Partnership’s natural gas and oil economically producible reserve quantities were determined by valuing in-ground natural gas and oil resources, at the price of natural gas and oil as of December 31, 2008. Upon adoption, in the fourth quarter of 2009, of the SEC’s final rule regarding the modernization of oil and gas reporting, the Partnership changed to a valuation price determined by the 12-month average of the first-day-of-the-month price during each month of 2009.

Six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to six months ended June 30, 2009

The DD&A expense rate per Mcfe increased to $5.06 for the 2010 six month period, compared to $4.51 during the same period in 2009, as calculated by the respective methodologies described above. The increase in the per Mcfe rates for the 2010 period compared to the 2009 period is primarily the result of the changing production mix between the Partnership’s Wattenberg and Grand Valley Fields, which have significantly different DD&A rates. This was effected by field-level depletion rate changes due to the reserve revisions at December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 in which proved developed producing downward revisions in the Partnership’s Grand Valley Field were partially offset by upward proved developed producing revisions in its Wattenberg Field. The increased DD&A expense rate, which offset the effect of the production declines noted in previous sections, resulted in a decreased DD&A expense of approximately $0.1 million for the 2010 six month period compared to the same 2009 period.

- 20 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Three months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to three months ended June 30, 2009

The DD&A expense rate per Mcfe increased to $4.74 for the 2010 second quarter, compared to $4.63 during the same quarter in 2009 as calculated by the respective methodologies described above. The increase in the per Mcfe rates for the 2010 second quarter compared to the 2009 second quarter is a result of the combined effects of the changing production mix between fields and changes in field-level depletion rates, noted above. The higher DD&A expense rate, which partially offset the effect of the production declines noted in previous sections, resulted in the DD&A expense decrease of approximately $0.1 million for the 2010 second quarter compared to the same 2009 quarter.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

The Partnership’s primary sources of cash for both the three and the six months ended June 30, 2010 were from funds provided by operating activities which include the sale of natural gas and oil production and the realized gains from the Partnership’s derivative positions. These sources of cash were primarily used to fund the Partnership’s operating costs, general and administrative activities and provide monthly distributions to the Investor Partners and PDC, the Managing General Partner. Fluctuations in the Partnership’s operating cash flow are substantially driven by changes in commodity prices, in production volumes and in realized gains and losses from commodity positions. Commodity prices have historically been volatile and the Partnership attempts to manage this volatility through derivatives. Therefore, the primary source of the Partnership’s cash flow from operations becomes the net activity between the Partnership’s natural gas and oil sales and realized derivative gains and losses. However, the Partnership does not engage in speculative positions, nor does the Partnership hold economic hedges for 100% of the Partnership’s expected future production from producing wells and therefore may still experience significant fluctuations in cash flows from operations. As of June 30, 2010, the Partnership had natural gas and oil derivative positions in place covering 78% of expected natural gas production and 86% of expected oil production for the remainder of 2010, at an average price of $4.00 per Mcf and $92.96 per Bbl, respectively. See Results of Operations for further discussion of the impact of prices and volumes on sales from operations and the impact of derivative activities on the Partnership’s revenues.

The Partnership’s future operations are expected to be conducted with available funds and revenues generated from natural gas and oil production activities and commodity gains (losses). Natural gas and oil production from the Partnership’s existing properties are generally expected to continue a gradual decline in the rate of production over the remaining lives of the wells. Therefore, the Partnership anticipates a lower annual level of natural gas and oil production and, in the absence of significant price increases or recompletions, lower revenues. The Partnership also expects cash flows from operations to decline if commodity prices remain at current levels or decrease in the future. Under these circumstances decreased production would have a material negative impact on the Partnership’s operations and may result in reduced cash distributions to the Investor Partners through the remainder of 2010 and beyond, and may substantially reduce or restrict the Partnership’s ability to participate in the Well Recompletion Plan activities which are more fully described in Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations−Well Recompletion Plan. Future cash distributions, in the event that the proposed Merger Agreement is not completed, may also be reduced to fund the Wattenberg Field Codell formation well recompletions.

- 21 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Working Capital

Working capital at June 30, 2010 was $0.4 million compared to working capital of $0.5 million at December 31, 2009. This decrease of approximately $0.1 million was primarily due to the following changes in accounts receivable or payable balances:

Natural gas and oil receivables decreased to approximately $0.2 million as of June 30, 2010, from approximately $0.3 million as of December 31, 2009.

Realized derivative gains receivables decreased by $0.2 million as of June 30, 2010.

Net short-term unrealized derivative gains receivable increased to approximately $0.1 million as of June 30, 2010.

Due to Managing General Partner-other, net, excluding natural gas and oil sales received from third parties and realized derivative gains, decreased to a $0.1 million liability as of June 30, 2010, from an approximate $0.2 million liability as of December 31, 2009.

Cash Flows

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

The Partnership, from time-to-time, invests in additional equipment which supports treatment, delivery and measurement of natural gas and oil or environmental protection. These amounts totaled approximately $4,000 and $29,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

The Partnership initiated monthly cash distributions to investors in May 2005 and has distributed $16.2 million through June 30, 2010. The table below presents the cash distributions to the Managing General Partner and Investor Partners, including Managing General Partner distributions relating to limited partnership units repurchased, for the periods described.

Three months ended June 30,	Managing General Partner Distributions		Investor Partners Distributions		Total Distributions

2010	$	73,739	$	294,957	$	368,696

2009	$	98,426	$	393,706	$	492,132


Six months ended June 30,	Managing General Partner Distributions		Investor Partners Distributions		Total Distributions

2010	$	149,967	$	599,872	$	749,839

2009	$	176,662	$	706,649	$	883,311

- 22 -

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to $0.9 million for the comparable period in 2009. The approximately $0.2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the following:

An increase in natural gas and oil sales receipts of $0.1 million, or 19%, accompanied by a decrease in direct costs – general and administrative of $0.1 million, or 51%;

A decrease in commodity price risk management realized gains receipts of $0.2 million or 44%; and

A decrease in the liability Due to Managing General Partner-other, net, excluding natural gas and oil sales received from third parties and realized derivative gains, of $0.2 million.

Commitments and Contingencies

See Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, to the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements, included in this report.

Recent Accounting Standards

See Note 2, Recent Accounting Standards to the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements, included in this report.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses.

There have been no other significant changes to the Partnership’s critical accounting policies and estimates or in the underlying accounting assumptions and estimates used in these critical accounting policies from those disclosed in the financial statements and accompanying notes contained in the Partnership’s 2009 Form 10-K, such policies include revenue recognition, derivatives instruments, fair value measurements, natural gas and oil properties, and asset retirement obligations are based on, among other things, judgments and assumptions made by management that include inherent risks and uncertainties.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Currently, the Partnership does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

- 23 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures

The Partnership has no direct management or officers. The management, officers and other employees that provide services on behalf of the Partnership are employed by the Managing General Partner.

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2010, PDC, as Managing General Partner of the Partnership, carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Managing General Partner’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). This evaluation considered the various processes carried out under the direction of the Managing General Partner’s Disclosure Committee in an effort to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the SEC reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Partnership’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely discussion regarding required financial disclosure.

Based on the results of this evaluation, the Managing General Partner’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

PDC, the Managing General Partner, made no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

- 24 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Information regarding the Registrant’s legal proceedings can be found in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, to the Partnership’s accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Not applicable.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Unit Repurchase Program: Beginning May 2008, the third anniversary of the date of the first Partnership cash distributions, Investor Partners of the Partnership may request that the Managing General Partner repurchase their respective individual Investor Partner units, up to an aggregate total limit, during any calendar year, for all requesting Investor Partner unit repurchases of 10% of the initial subscription units. There were no limited partner units repurchased by the Managing General Partner during the three months ended June 30, 2010. As of July 1, 2010, the Managing General Partner suspended the opportunity for an individual investor partner to request that PDC repurchase their respective limited partnership units under the terms of the program, pending the outcome of the proposed Merger Agreement.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.

[Removed and Reserved]

Item 5.

Other Information

Not applicable.

- 25 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

Item 6.

Exhibits

(a) Exhibit Index.

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

SEC File

Number

Exhibit

Filing Date

Filed Herewith

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among PDC, DP 2004 Merger Sub, LLC and PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership

8-K

000-51220

2.1

06/09/2010

3.1

Limited Partnership Agreement

PREM14A

000-51220

Annex F

07/14/2010

3.2

Certificate of limited partnership which reflects the organization of the Partnership under West Virginia law

10-K

000-51220

3.2

08/05/2009

10.1

Drilling and operating agreement between the Partnership and PDC, as Managing General Partner of the Partnership

10-K

000-51220

10.1

08/05/2009

31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(c) Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(c) Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) Certifications by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, the Managing General Partner of the Partnership.

- 26 -

Index

PDC 2004-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(A West Virginia Limited Partnership)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership

By its Managing General Partner

Petroleum Development Corporation

	By: /s/ Richard W. McCullough
	Richard W. McCullough Chairman and Chief Executive Officer August 12, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Richard W. McCullough	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	August 12, 2010
Richard W. McCullough	Petroleum Development Corporation
	Managing General Partner of the Registrant
	(Principal executive officer)

/s/ Gysle R. Shellum	Chief Financial Officer	August 12, 2010
Gysle R. Shellum	Petroleum Development Corporation
	Managing General Partner of the Registrant
	(Principal financial officer)

/s/ R. Scott Meyers	Chief Accounting Officer	August 12, 2010
R. Scott Meyers	Petroleum Development Corporation
	Managing General Partner of the Registrant
	(Principal accounting officer)

- 27 -

PDC 2004-C Limited Partnership 10-Q