UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to __________

Commission file number: 33-59380

FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION *

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		13-3287757
State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization		Identification No.)

529 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY		10017
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

212-808-2800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o

No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes x

No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes o

No x

*(Note: As a voluntary filer, not subject to the filing requirements, the registrant filed all reports under Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o

No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Not Applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o

No x

As of April 24, 2009, there were 1,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the registrant outstanding. As of such date, all shares of common stock were owned by the registrant's parent, Finlay Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $0 as of August 1, 2008.

FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2009

INDEX

Page(s)

PART I
	Item 1.	Business	3
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	10
	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	14
	Item 2.	Properties	14
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	14
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	14

PART II
	Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
		and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	15
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	15
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
		Condition and Results of Operations	16
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	30
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	31
	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
		Accounting and Financial Disclosure	31
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	31
	Item 9B.	Other Information	32

PART III
	Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	34
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	37
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
		Related Stockholder Matters	56
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	58
	Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	59

PART IV
	Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	60

SIGNATURES			68

PART I

Item 1. Business

General Overview

Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Finlay Jewelry”, the “Registrant”, “we”, “us” and “our”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Finlay Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Holding Company”). References to “Finlay” mean, collectively, the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry. All references herein to “departments” refer to fine jewelry departments operated pursuant to license agreements with host stores and all references herein to “stand-alone jewelry stores” refer to our specialty jewelry stores.

As a result of the decline in our department store based business over the past several years coupled with the challenging economic conditions under which we are currently operating, we announced in February 2009, our plan to exit the licensed department store based business and close approximately half of our specialty jewelry stores in 2009. The implementation of our strategic plan will result in a significant reduction in our sales from over $750.0 million from our two business segments in 2008 to a go forward specialty jewelry store business that is expected to achieve annual sales in the range of $150.0 million to $200.0 million. The plan includes the liquidation of inventory and the termination of license agreements or leases in the affected department store based fine jewelry departments and specialty jewelry stores. In addition, we intend to liquidate excess inventory in our go forward specialty jewelry stores as a means of generating cash and reducing such excess inventory.

We view the execution of this strategic plan as crucial to strengthening the financial condition of our go forward specialty jewelry store business. Our go forward business will include selected stores anticipated, in management’s opinion, to provide us with our best opportunity for future success. We intend to reduce our cost structure to levels appropriate to support the specialty jewelry store business, which will include significantly reducing headcount in our administrative and distribution center functions as well as eliminating sales associate positions in the affected department stores and specialty store locations. We expect to complete the strategic plan by the end of 2009. There can be no assurances that the implementation of our strategic plan will be successful or that the net sales proceeds from the liquidation of inventory in the closing locations will be sufficient to repay the outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility (defined below).

In conjunction with the adoption of this strategic plan, we amended our revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) in February 2009, as adjusted in March 2009, to reduce the senior secured revolving line of credit from $550.0 million to $266.6 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and to increase the interest rates thereunder. The amendment also requires us to comply with various milestones in connection with the strategic plan, to provide additional financial reporting to the lenders and to maintain compliance with a variance covenant from the approved restructuring budget. Additionally, the Revolving Credit Agreement now matures in February 2010. The net sales proceeds from the liquidation of inventory will be used to repay our outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility in 2009. As a result of the liquidation in the locations we plan to close, the outstanding balance under the Revolving Credit Facility has been reduced from $236.2 million at the end of 2008 to approximately $130.0 million at the end of April 2009.

Effective with the February 2009 amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement, we now are required to achieve certain weekly targeted percentages of our sales and cash receipts and maintain cash disbursements below certain targeted percentages as set forth in our operating plan. We are currently in default of this covenant. Although the lenders reserve all rights and remedies under the Revolving Credit Agreement and can accelerate repayment of the outstanding balance at any time, they have not exercised such rights at this time. As a result of cross-default provisions, such acceleration would enable the holders of our long-term debt to declare a default and demand repayment as well.

We entered into a consulting agreement with Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC (“Gordon Brothers”), to manage the sale of inventory and fixed assets in the specialty jewelry stores that we plan to close. In consideration of Gordon Brothers’ services, we will pay them a base consulting fee as well as a contingent fee based on the achievement of certain profitability thresholds in the stores that we plan to close. In addition, we have entered into a consignment agreement with Gordon Brothers for certain merchandise that is currently being sold through the specialty jewelry stores that we plan to close and for which Gordon Brothers has the ability to earn a percentage of the profits on the sale of such merchandise. Further, we have entered into a consulting agreement with Gordon Brothers to assist with the liquidation of the inventory in the department store based fine jewelry departments for which we will pay them a base fee.

In addition, we have retained the management consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC (“A&M”) to work with our board of directors and management in analyzing Finlay’s business strategies, plans and operations. David Coles, an A&M employee, is providing consulting services to our board of directors and management as the Holding Company’s Chief Restructuring Officer.

Effective March 22, 2009, we completed the sale of certain assets to Bloomingdale’s. The assets included inventory and fixed assets for the 34 departments that we operated in Bloomingdale’s for a purchase price of approximately $33.4 million. The proceeds from this transaction were used to pay down a portion of the outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility.

As a result of the items discussed above, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $58.9 million in 2008 primarily for the impairment of fixed assets and intangible assets and the write-down of inventory, including the estimated loss on the sale of inventory to Bloomingdale’s. With respect to the exiting of the department store based business and the anticipated closing of approximately half of our specialty jewelry stores in 2009, we expect to record a pre-tax charge in the range of $12.0 to $15.0 million for severance and retention costs, lease termination costs and other items.

In 2008, we executed several agreements to exchange $159.4 million of our $200.0 million Senior Notes due June 1, 2012 (the “Senior Notes”) held by certain noteholders (the “Participating Noteholders”), for new 8.375%/8.945% Senior Secured Third Lien Notes due June 1, 2012 (the “Third Lien Notes”). In addition, the Participating Noteholders purchased $22.8 million of new 11.375%/12.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due June 1, 2012 (the “Second Lien Notes,” together with the Third Lien Notes, the “Secured Notes”). The refinancing of the Senior Notes enables us to eliminate a significant portion of the cash interest payment of $16.8 million that would have been payable annually on the Senior Notes as the Secured Notes include a pay-in-kind interest (“PIK Interest”) feature until December 1, 2010.

Description of the Business

In recent years, we have managed our operations under two business segments: licensed department store based fine jewelry departments and specialty jewelry stores, which consists of Bailey Banks & Biddle, Carlyle and Congress stores, as described below. As of January 31, 2009, we operated a total of 674 locations, including 566 departments in seven host store groups in 38 states, as well as 108 stand-alone jewelry stores operating as 69 Bailey Banks & Biddle stores in 24 states, 34 Carlyle stores in nine states and five Congress stores located in southwest Florida.

We currently operate licensed fine jewelry departments in major department stores for Macy’s, Inc. (“Macy’s”), The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (“Bon-Ton”), Dillard’s, Inc. (“Dillard’s”) and Gottschalks where we sell moderately priced fine jewelry, including necklaces, earrings, bracelets, rings and watches, and market these items principally as fashion accessories with an average sales price of approximately $270 per item. In 2008, our department store based fine jewelry sales comprised 59% of our total sales.

As a result of Macy’s on-going corporate restructuring initiatives, 93 departments were phased into existing Macy’s divisions at the end of 2008. Total sales generated from these departments in 2008 and 2007 were $108.5 million and $120.0 million, respectively. In February 2008, we received notification that our Lord & Taylor license agreement would not be renewed as of January 31, 2009, and we would close our departments at the end of 2008. In January 2009, we agreed with Lord & Taylor to delay the closing of these departments until April 2009. In 2008 and 2007, the Lord & Taylor departments generated $43.2 million and $44.0 million, respectively, in sales.

We operated 566 department store based fine jewelry departments at the end of 2008. Bloomingdale’s began operating 34 of these departments on March 22, 2009 and we plan to liquidate inventory in and close the remaining department store based fine jewelry departments by the end of the third quarter of 2009. We expect the department store based fine jewelry departments to generate approximately 48% of our total sales in 2009.

In November 2007, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of the assets and specified liabilities of the Bailey Banks & Biddle division of Zale Corporation, a nationwide chain of 69 stand-alone retail stores with a focus on the luxury market, offering jewelry and watches under high-end name brands, with an average selling price of approximately $1,275 per item and an average store size of approximately 3,950 square feet.

For over 175 years, Bailey Banks & Biddle has combined classic jewelry with contemporary designs, offering a compelling shopping environment for the high-end luxury consumer. Bailey Banks & Biddle stores are among the preeminent jewelers in their markets, carrying both exclusive and recognized branded and designer merchandise selections to appeal to the more affluent customer. Bailey Banks & Biddle merchandise assortments focus on diamonds, precious gemstones, gold and branded designer jewelry, which is complemented by an extensive assortment of prestige watch brands and giftware.

In May 2005, we completed the acquisition of Carlyle & Co. Jewelers (“Carlyle”). Carlyle currently operates 34 specialty jewelry stores located primarily in the southeastern United States under the Carlyle & Co., J.E. Caldwell & Co. and Park Promenade trade names, which sell luxury priced jewelry with an average sales price of approximately $1,200 per item. The Carlyle stores are principally located in shopping malls and lifestyle centers and focus on the designer and high-end jewelry markets. Average sales per store were $2.5 million in 2008 and the average size of a store is approximately 2,100 square feet. In November 2006, we completed the acquisition of L. Congress, Inc. (“Congress”), a regional chain of five stores located in southwest Florida.

We were initially incorporated on August 2, 1985 as SL Holdings Corporation (“SL Holdings”), and the Holding Company was incorporated on November 22, 1988. In connection with a reorganization transaction in 1988, SL Holdings changed its name to Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Holding Company. Carlyle and Congress are each a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. Upon acquisition, Bailey Banks & Biddle became an unincorporated division of ours. Our principal executive offices are located at 529 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10017 and our telephone number at this address is (212) 808-2800.

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31. References to 2009, 2008 and 2007 relate to the fiscal years ending or ended on January 30, 2010, January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively.

Overview of Operations

Stand-Alone Specialty Jewelry Stores. Our stand-alone jewelry stores, comprised of Bailey Banks & Biddle, Carlyle and Congress, are luxury jewelry stores offering compelling shopping environments for the high-end consumer. Our stand-alone jewelry stores carry exclusive and recognized branded and designer merchandise selections and merchandise assortments with a focus on watches, gold, designer jewelry, diamonds and precious gemstones, complemented by an assortment of giftware.

Our stores strive to provide their customers with a premier shopping experience by utilizing knowledgeable, professional and well-trained sales associates, marketing programs designed to promote customer awareness of their merchandise assortments and extending credit to their customers through their credit card programs. In 2009, we plan to complete the transition to a specialty jewelry store business.

Licensed Department Store Based Fine Jewelry Departments. In connection with our licensed fine jewelry departments operation, we sell moderately priced fine jewelry, including necklaces, earrings, bracelets, rings and watches, and market these items principally as fashion accessories with an average sales price of approximately $270 per item. Most of our departments have between 50 and 150 linear feet of display cases (with an average of approximately 80 linear feet) generally located in high traffic areas on the main floor of our host stores. In 2009, we plan to complete the liquidation of our inventory and close the remaining department store based fine jewelry departments.

Advertising. With respect to our stand-alone jewelry stores, products are promoted through direct mail, outdoor and regional print advertising and sponsorships. With respect to our licensed department store based fine jewelry business, we promote our products primarily through four-color direct mail catalogs using targeted mailing lists developed by our host stores and newspaper advertising. The majority of our license agreements require us to expend certain specified minimum percentages of the respective department’s annual sales on advertising and promotional activities. In 2009, we plan to focus on promoting the merchandise offered in our go forward stand-alone jewelry stores through direct mail, outdoor and regional print advertising.

Inventory Loss Prevention and Insurance. We undertake substantial efforts to safeguard our merchandise from loss or theft, including the installation of safes and lockboxes at each location and the taking of a daily diamond inventory count. Additionally, with respect to our stand-alone jewelry stores, each store has a sophisticated security system in place. During 2008, inventory shrinkage amounted to approximately 0.5% of sales. We maintain insurance covering the risk of loss of merchandise in transit or on our premises (whether owned or on consignment) in amounts that management believes are reasonable and adequate for the types and amounts of merchandise we offer for sale.

Industry

Consumers spent approximately $66.0 billion on jewelry (including both fine and costume jewelry) in the United States in 2008, an increase of approximately $22.0 billion over 1998, according to the United States Department of Commerce. Our management believes that greater disposable income in the United States population in general has contributed to the historical growth of the fine jewelry retailing industry. However, the current macro-economic environment has caused a recent, dramatic and continuing decrease in consumer discretionary spending.

Competition

We face competition for retail jewelry sales from national and regional jewelry chains, other department stores in which we do not operate fine jewelry departments, local independently owned jewelry stores, specialty stores, mass merchandisers, catalog showrooms, discounters, direct mail suppliers, televised home shopping and internet merchants. Our management believes that competition in the retail jewelry industry is based primarily on quality, fashion appeal and perceived value of the product offered and on the reputation, integrity and service of the retailer.

Strategies

Transition to Specialty Jewelry Store Business. We intend to employ the following key initiatives as we transition to a specialty jewelry store business:

Implement our strategic plan;

Refinance or replace our Revolving Credit Agreement to improve liquidity;

Consolidate our specialty jewelry store businesses under one management team;

Reduce expenses;

Improve comparable store sales;

Focus on improved marketing initiatives to more efficiently reach and expand our customer base; and

Maintain high customer service standards.

Merchandising Strategy. The merchandising strategy for our stand-alone jewelry stores is built around their customer profiles and partnering with suppliers. Through analysis of customer demographics, fashion trends, industry trends and vendor and store management recommendations, we seek to maximize sales and profitability by merchandising to the customer tastes within the geographic areas in which the stores operate.

Store Relationships

Department Store Based Fine Jewelry Relationships. We expect to exit the licensed department store based business by the end of the third quarter of 2009. The following table identifies the host store groups in which we operated department store based fine jewelry departments at January 31, 2009, the year in which our relationship with each host store group commenced and the number of departments operated by us in each host store group.

	Inception of		Number of
Host Store Group	Relationship		Departments

Macy’s
Macy’s Central (1)	1983			216
Bloomingdale’s (2)	2000			34
Total Macy’s Departments					250

Bon-Ton
The Bon-Ton/Elder-Beerman (1)	1986			77
Carson Pirie Scott/Bergner’s/Boston Store/Younkers/Herberger’s (1)	1977			86
Total Bon-Ton Departments					163

Other Departments
Gottschalks (1)	1969			36
Lord & Taylor (3)		1978*		36
Dillard’s (1)	1997			81
Total Other Departments					153
Total Departments					566

* Represents the year in which our relationship began with the host store group previously owned by May Department Stores Company (“May”).

(1)

We expect to exit our licensed department store based business by the end of the third quarter of 2009.

(2)

Effective March 22, 2009, Bloomingdale’s operates these departments.

(3)

We will close our Lord & Taylor departments in the first quarter of 2009.

Terms of Department Store Based Fine Jewelry License Agreements. In exchange for the right to operate a department within the host store, we pay each host store a license fee, calculated as a percentage of sales. Our license agreements typically require host stores to remit sales proceeds for each month (without regard to whether such sales were cash, store credit or national credit card) to us approximately three weeks after the end of such month. Each host store group withholds from the remittance of sales proceeds the license fee and other expenditures, such as advertising costs, which the host store group may have incurred on our behalf.

We are usually responsible for providing and maintaining any fixtures and other equipment necessary to operate our departments, while the host store is typically required to provide clean space for installation of any necessary fixtures. The host store is generally responsible for paying utility costs (except certain telephone charges), maintenance and certain other expenses associated with the operation of the departments. Our license agreements typically provide that we are responsible for the hiring (subject to the suitability of such employees to the host store) and discharge of our sales and department supervisory personnel, and substantially all license agreements require us to provide our employees with salaries and certain benefits comparable to those received by the host store’s employees. In certain instances, we are operating departments without written agreements, although the arrangements in respect of such departments are generally in accordance with the terms described herein. In 2009, the terms of the written and unwritten agreements will end as we implement our plan to exit the licensed department store based business by the end of the third quarter of 2009.

Credit. Our stand-alone jewelry stores maintain private label credit card programs that are managed by third-parties. We have no liability to the card issuer for bad debt expense, provided that purchases are made in accordance with the issuing banks’ procedures. Our stand-alone jewelry stores’ credit programs are intended to complement their overall merchandising and marketing strategy by encouraging larger and more frequent sales and by offering credit card holders special offers and advance notice of in-store sales events. During 2008, such private label credit card purchases accounted for approximately 29% of our stand-alone store sales.

In the department store based fine jewelry departments, substantially all consumer credit risk is borne by the host store rather than by us. Purchasers of our merchandise at a host store are entitled to the use of the host store’s credit facilities on the same basis as all of the host store’s customers. Payment of credit card or check transactions is generally guaranteed to us by the host store, provided that the proper credit approvals have been obtained in accordance with the host store’s policy. Accordingly, payment to us in respect of our sales proceeds is generally not dependent on when, or if, payment is received by the host store.

Locations Opened/Closed. During 2008, location openings offset by closings resulted in a net decrease of 119 locations. The openings, which totaled ten locations, included four departments within existing host store groups and six specialty jewelry stores. The closings totaled 129 locations, including 125 departments and four specialty jewelry stores. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-2008 Compared with 2007”.

Products and Pricing

Each of our locations offers a broad selection of necklaces, earrings, bracelets, rings and watches. Other than watches, substantially all of the fine jewelry items sold by us are made from precious metals and many also contain diamonds or colored gemstones. We also provide jewelry and watch repair services. We do not carry costume or gold-filled jewelry. Specific brand identification is generally not important within the fine jewelry business, except for watches and designer jewelry. The stand-alone jewelry stores emphasize designer jewelry and, for the Carlyle and Congress stores, the Rolex brand. The department store based fine jewelry departments emphasize brand name vendors, including Citizen, Bulova, Movado and Seiko with respect to watches. In connection with our strategic plan, we intend to liquidate excess inventory in our go forward specialty jewelry stores as a means of generating cash and reducing excess inventory.

In 2008, the average price of items sold by our stand-alone jewelry stores was approximately $1,275, with these stores carrying on average, approximately 3,000 to 4,000 items in stock. The department store based fine jewelry departments sell merchandise at prices generally ranging from $100 to $1,000. In 2008, the average price of items sold by these departments was approximately $270 per item. An average department has over 5,000 items in stock.

Consistent with fine jewelry retailing in general, a substantial portion of our department store based fine jewelry sales are made at prices discounted from listed retail prices. Our advertising and promotional planning are closely coordinated with our host store’s marketing efforts. A substantial portion of our sales occur during publicized sales events. The amount of time during which merchandise may be offered at discount prices is limited by applicable laws and regulations. See “Legal Proceedings”. In 2009, the focus on products and pricing in our department store based fine jewelry departments and closing specialty jewelry stores has shifted to liquidation as we implement our strategic plan.

Purchasing and Inventory

A key element of our strategy has been to lower the working capital investment required for operating our existing locations and opening new locations. At the end of 2008, our net investment in inventory (i.e., the total cost of inventory owned and paid for) was approximately 65% of the total cost of our on-hand merchandise. At the end of 2008, approximately 20% of our merchandise was held on consignment. In addition, we structure our relationships with vendors to encourage their participation in and responsibility for merchandise management. In early 2009, in connection with our strategic plan, we began the process of returning to our vendors substantially all of our merchandise held on consignment.

In 2008, approximately 41.9% of sales were generated by merchandise obtained from our ten largest vendors and approximately 6.2% of sales were generated by merchandise obtained from our largest vendor.

Personnel and Training

We consider our employees an important component of our operations and devote substantial resources to training and improving the quality of sales and management personnel. As of the end of 2008, we regularly employed approximately 9,700 people of which approximately 95% were regional and local sales and supervisory personnel with the balance employed in administrative or executive capacities. Of our 9,700 employees, a substantial number are part-time employees, working less than 32 hours per week. Our labor requirements fluctuate because of the seasonal nature of our business. None of our employees are unionized. In 2009, we intend to significantly reduce employee headcount to support the go forward specialty jewelry store business.

Seasonality

Our business is subject to substantial seasonal variations. Historically, we have realized a significant portion of our sales, cash flow and net income in the fourth quarter of the year principally due to sales from the holiday season. We expect that this general pattern will continue. Our results of operations may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of other factors, including the timing of new location openings and location closings.

Management Information and Inventory Control Systems

We use our management information systems to monitor sales, gross margin and inventory performance by location, merchandise category, style number and vendor. Using this information, we are able to monitor merchandise trends and variances in performance and improve the efficiency of our inventory management. Our merchandising and inventory control systems and point-of-sale systems have provided improved analysis and reporting capabilities. Additionally, we measure the productivity of our sales force by maintaining current statistics for each employee such as sales per hour, transactions per hour and transaction size.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors that May Affect Future Results

Set forth below are certain important risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition and cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements made by us. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7 for additional risk factors.

There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the successful implementation of our strategic plan, the repayment of the amounts due under the Revolving Credit Facility and our ability to secure a new line of credit on or before the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Agreement. In addition, we experienced a significant operating loss in 2008 and are expected to have an operating loss in 2009. As discussed above, we are in default of certain covenants under the Revolving Credit Agreement. These uncertainties raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As such, the independent auditor’s report accompanying our January 31, 2009 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph regarding these factors, which also constitutes a default under our Revolving Credit Agreement. If we cannot resolve some or all of these factors, we may be unable to maintain a level of liquidity necessary to continue to operate our business.

If we are unable to implement our strategic plan, we may be required to further curtail our operations or pursue other available options, although we can provide no assurance that any such steps will allow us to meet our obligations as they become due.

The current banking and credit crisis, the high unemployment rate, continued home foreclosures, the rising cost of basic necessities, and the reality that the U.S. has entered a recession created a highly challenging retail environment during 2008 that we anticipate will continue through 2009. These current conditions have negatively impacted our liquidity position and operating performance. There can be no assurances that the implementation of our strategic plan or that the net sales proceeds from the liquidation of inventory in the closing locations will be sufficient to repay the outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, there can be no assurances that our business operations, working capital and borrowing availability will be sufficient to meet current estimates of working capital requirements as well as allow Finlay Jewelry to maintain compliance with the $30.0 million minimum unused balance and other covenants required by the Revolving Credit Agreement. If we are unable to implement our strategic plan and repay the outstanding balance under the Revolving Credit Facility or to improve our liquidity and/or operating performance, we may be required to further curtail our operations or pursue other available options, although we can provide no assurance that any such steps will allow us to meet our obligations as they become due.

We are highly leveraged and we may not be able to refinance or restructure our long-term debt before it becomes due in 2012 or identify a new banking relationship to provide a revolving line of credit in 2009. In addition, the terms of our debt instruments impose financial and operating restrictions and we are currently in default with certain covenants under the Revolving Credit Agreement.

We currently have a significant amount of debt. As of January 31, 2009, we had $232.9 million of long-term debt due 2012, which includes the amounts outstanding on the Senior Notes and the Secured Notes, and $236.2 million outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility due 2010. We may not be able to refinance or restructure our long-term debt before it becomes due. Additionally, we may not be able to identify a new banking relationship to provide a revolving line of credit after we repay the outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility in 2009.

In addition, the Revolving Credit Agreement and the indentures relating to our long-term debt each contain restrictive covenants that will limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interests. These covenants include limitations on, or relating to, liens, indebtedness, investments, mergers, acquisitions, affiliated transactions, management compensation and the payment of dividends and other restricted payments. As of January 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all of our covenants.

Our senior management team is in transition.

The employment agreement of Arthur E. Reiner, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, expired on January 31, 2009 and Mr. Reiner is currently an employee at will. Joseph M. Melvin, our Chief Operating Officer, plans to retire at the end of June 2009 and Leslie A. Philip, our Chief Merchandising Officer, plans to retire at the end of May 2009. Accordingly, our go forward management team is in transition. Moreover, once the go forward management team is established, there is no assurance that its members will be able to successfully implement our strategic plan. Their failure to do so or our failure to effectively manage changes in senior management could have a material adverse effect on our business.

A continuation of the recent deterioration of significant portions of the global financial markets, particularly if it worsens, could further negatively impact our performance, both by affecting the levels of sales to our customers and by affecting our counterparties and the U.S. economy generally.

Declines in discretionary spending or in the availability of consumer credit could further reduce the volume of merchandise we sell, as well as the sales prices for the merchandise offered, and accordingly, our gross margin. In addition, concerns about the stability of the U.S. financial markets generally have reduced the availability of funding to certain financial institutions, leading to a tightening of credit, reduction of business activity, and increased market volatility. These negative economic conditions may result in financial difficulties for our vendors and the financial institutions that are counterparties to our credit facilities, which could negatively affect us. It is not clear at this time what impact the federal government’s liquidity and funding initiatives that have been announced or that may be initiated in the future will have on the financial markets, on the broader U.S. and global economies, or ultimately on us.

Our stand-alone jewelry store business could be adversely affected if it is unable to successfully renegotiate certain on going leases on more favorable lease terms as well as negotiate new leases on acceptable lease terms.

All of our stand-alone stores are leased with most having a term of ten years. Rent for those stores is a fixed minimum base plus, for certain of the stores, a percentage of store sales in excess of a specified threshold. We have a number of leases for go forward stores that we intend to renegotiate with landlords in order to operate them in a profitable manner. We have generally been successful in negotiating leases for new stores and lease renewals. However, our stand-alone jewelry store business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected if we are unable to renegotiate certain on going leases on more favorable lease terms as well as negotiate acceptable new and renewal lease terms.

We are highly dependent on several key vendors and other suppliers.

In 2008, approximately 41.9% of sales were generated by merchandise obtained from our ten largest vendors, and approximately 6.2% of sales were generated by merchandise obtained from our largest vendor. There can be no assurance that we can identify, on a timely basis, alternate sources of merchandise supply in the case of an abrupt loss of any of our significant suppliers. Additionally, we receive allowances from our vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements, including cooperative advertising, and we expect to earn significantly lower levels of these allowances in 2009. During 2008, many of our key vendors were unable to maintain their historical credit terms with us as a result of our deteriorating liquidity. Many of these vendors became party to the Third Lien Notes for $24.9 million of trade payable balances in February 2009. Additional restrictions on the credit limits or payment terms that we have with our vendors could have a further adverse impact on our liquidity position.

The seasonality of the retail jewelry business makes our profitability substantially dependent on our fourth quarter results.

Our business is highly seasonal, with a significant portion of our sales and income from operations generated during the fourth quarter of each year, which includes the year-end holiday season. We have typically experienced net losses in the first three quarters of our fiscal year. During these periods, working capital requirements have been funded by borrowings under our Revolving Credit Agreement. This pattern is expected to continue. A substantial decrease in sales during the fourth quarter, whether resulting from adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, supply chain problems or any other cause, would have a material adverse effect on our profitability and our financial condition.

A continuing decline in discretionary consumer spending has adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our industry, our operations and our profitability.

Luxury products, such as fine jewelry, are discretionary purchases for consumers. Any reduction in consumer discretionary spending or disposable income may affect our industry more significantly than other industries. Many economic factors outside of our control have affected and could continue to affect consumer discretionary spending, including the financial markets, consumer credit availability, prevailing interest rates, energy costs, employment levels, salary levels and tax rates. A continued reduction in discretionary consumer spending could materially adversely affect our business and financial condition, especially if such changes were to occur in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year.

Our locations are heavily dependent on customer traffic and the continued popularity of malls.

The success of our specialty jewelry stores depends, in part, on our ability to generate customer traffic in our stores, and on the continuing popularity of malls as shopping destinations. Customer traffic, sales volume and earnings have been and may continue to be adversely affected by economic slowdowns or adverse weather conditions in a particular geographic area, the closing of anchor tenants, or competition from retailers such as discount and mass merchandise stores and other specialty jewelry stores.

Volatility in the availability and cost of precious metals and precious and semi-precious stones could adversely affect our business.

The jewelry industry in general is affected by fluctuations in the prices of precious metals and precious and semi-precious stones. The availability and prices of gold, diamonds and other precious metals and precious and semi-precious stones may be influenced by cartels, political instability in exporting countries and inflation. Shortages of these materials or sharp changes in their prices could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. A significant change in prices of key commodities, including gold and diamonds, could adversely affect our business by reducing operating margins and impacting consumer demand if retail prices are increased significantly. Moreover, human rights issues in countries exporting diamonds and other precious gemstones may affect consumer demand for these products.

The retail jewelry business is highly competitive.

We face competition for retail jewelry sales from national and regional jewelry chains, department stores which operate their own fine jewelry departments, local independently owned jewelry stores, specialty stores, mass merchandisers, catalog showrooms, discounters, direct mail suppliers, internet merchants and televised home shopping. Some of our competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial resources than us. Competition may result in price pressure, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could substantially harm our business and results of operations.

Our success depends on our ability to identify and rapidly respond to fashion trends.

The jewelry industry is subject to rapidly changing fashion trends and shifting consumer demands. Accordingly, our success depends on the priority that our target customers place on fashion and our ability to anticipate, identify and capitalize upon emerging fashion trends. If we misjudge fashion trends and are unable to adjust our product offerings in a timely manner, our net sales may decline or fail to meet expectations and any excessive inventory may need to be sold at lower prices.

We could be materially adversely affected if our distribution operations are disrupted.

In conjunction with our strategic plan, we are currently evaluating alternatives to move the distribution of merchandise for our go forward specialty store business to a new location. During the transition to a new facility, we could incur higher costs and longer lead times to distribute merchandise to our stores.

We are heavily dependent on our management information systems and our ability to maintain and upgrade these systems from time to time.

The efficient operation of our business is heavily dependent on our management information systems. In particular, we rely on our inventory and merchandising control systems, which allow us to make better decisions in the allocation and distribution of our merchandise. Our business and operations could be materially and adversely affected if our systems were inoperable or inaccessible or if we were not able, for any reason, to successfully restore our systems and fully execute our disaster recovery plan.

From time to time, we improve and upgrade our management information systems. If we are unable to maintain and upgrade our systems or to integrate new and updated systems in an efficient and timely manner, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The future impact of legal and regulatory issues is unknown.

Our business is subject to government laws and regulations including, but not limited to, employment laws and regulations, state advertising regulations, quality standards imposed by federal law, and other laws and regulations. A violation or change of these laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the future impact of litigation arising in the ordinary course of business may have an adverse effect on our financial results or reputation.

We could have failures in our system of internal control over financial reporting.

We maintain a documented system of internal control over financial reporting which is reviewed and monitored by management, who meet regularly with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. We believe we have a well-designed system to maintain adequate internal control; however, there can be no assurances that control deficiencies will not arise in the future. Although we have devoted significant resources to document, test, monitor and improve our internal control, we cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that our controls will be adequate in the future or that adequate controls will be effective in preventing fraud. Any failures in the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on the accuracy of our financial statements and our ability to detect fraud and could cause us to fail to meet reporting obligations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We own a central distribution facility, totaling 106,200 square feet located in Orange, Connecticut, and Carlyle’s administrative office, totaling approximately 19,700 square feet located in Greensboro, North Carolina. In addition, we lease approximately 49,100 square feet at 529 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York for our executive, accounting, advertising, merchandising, information systems and other administrative functions. The leases for such space expire on September 30, 2023. Generally, as part of our department store based fine jewelry license agreements, our host stores provide office space for our host store group management personnel free of charge. Congress’ 4,360 square foot administrative office is located in Bonita Springs, Florida, the lease for which expires on March 31, 2011.

At January 31, 2009, Bailey Banks & Biddle had a total of 69 leased stores, Carlyle had a total of 34 leased stores and Congress had five leased stores, which leases expire on various dates through 2017. Store leases are generally for a term of ten years. Rent for these stores is a fixed minimum base plus, for certain of the stores, a percentage of store sales in excess of a specified threshold. In 2009, we plan to close approximately half of our specialty jewelry stores and terminate the related leases.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. As of April 24, 2009, we are not a party to any legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Commonly in the retail jewelry industry, a substantial amount of merchandise is sold at a discount to the “regular” or “original” price. Our experience is consistent with this practice. A number of states in which we operate have regulations which require retailers who offer merchandise at discounted prices to offer the merchandise at the “regular” or “original” prices for stated periods of time. Our management believes we are in substantial compliance with all applicable legal requirements with respect to such practices.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2008.

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

During 2008 and 2007, there were no cash dividends distributed to the Holding Company by us. Certain restrictive covenants in the indentures relating to our Senior Notes and Secured Notes and the Revolving Credit Agreement impose limitations on the payment of dividends to the Holding Company. Additionally, the Senior Notes and the Revolving Credit Agreement currently restrict the amount of annual distributions to the Holding Company.

There was one record holder of our common stock at April 24, 2009.

We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Holding Company. Accordingly, there is no established public trading market for our common stock.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

There were no repurchases of equity securities by us during the fourth quarter of 2008.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not required.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") is organized as follows:

Executive Overview – This section provides a general description of our business and a brief discussion of the opportunities, risks and uncertainties that we focus on in the operation of our business.

Results of Operations – This section provides an analysis of the significant line items on the consolidated statements of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources – This section provides an analysis of liquidity, cash flows, sources and uses of cash, contractual obligations and financial position.

Seasonality – This section describes the effects of seasonality on our business.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – This section discusses those accounting policies that are considered important to our financial condition and results of operations, and require us to exercise subjective or complex judgments in their application. In addition, all of our significant accounting policies, including critical accounting policies, are summarized in Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements – This section provides cautionary information about forward-looking statements and description of certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical results or current expectations or projections.

This MD&A has been updated for the purpose of restating our financial statements for stores which have been treated as discontinued operations.

Executive Overview

Our Business and 2009 Current Events

We currently have two operating segments – licensed department store based fine jewelry departments and stand-alone specialty jewelry stores. Our licensed fine jewelry departments are located in major department stores where we sell moderately priced jewelry, with an average sales price of approximately $270 per item. Our stand-alone specialty jewelry stores sell luxury priced jewelry at an average sales price of approximately $1,275 per item. As of January 31, 2009, we operated a total of 674 locations, including 566 department store based fine jewelry departments in seven host store groups, in 38 states, as well as 108 stand-alone jewelry stores operating as 69 Bailey Banks & Biddle stores in 24 states, 34 Carlyle stores in nine states, located principally in the southeastern United States and five Congress stores in southwest Florida.

In conjunction with the adoption of this strategic plan, we amended our Revolving Credit Agreement in February 2009, as adjusted in March 2009, to reduce the senior secured revolving line of credit from $550.0 million to $266.6 million and to increase the interest rates thereunder. The amendment also requires us to comply with various milestones in connection with the strategic plan, to provide additional financial reporting to the lenders and to maintain compliance with a variance covenant from the approved restructuring budget. Additionally, the Revolving Credit Agreement now matures in February 2010. The net sales proceeds from the liquidation of inventory will be used to repay our outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility in 2009. As a result of the liquidation in the locations we plan to close, the outstanding balance under the Revolving Credit Facility has been reduced from $236.2 million at the end of 2008 to approximately $130.0 million at the end of April 2009.

Effective with the February 2009 amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement, we now are required to achieve certain weekly targeted percentages of our sales and cash receipts and maintain cash disbursements below certain targeted percentages as set forth in our operating plan, and we are currently in default of this covenant. Although the lenders reserve all rights and remedies under the Revolving Credit Agreement and can accelerate repayment of the outstanding balance at any time, they have not exercised such rights at this time. As a result of cross-default provisions, such acceleration would enable the holders of our long-term debt to declare a default and demand repayment as well.

We entered into a consulting agreement with Gordon Brothers to manage the sale of inventory and fixed assets in the specialty jewelry stores that we plan to close. In consideration of Gordon Brothers’ services, we will pay them a base consulting fee as well as a contingent fee based on the achievement of certain profitability thresholds in the stores that we plan to close. In addition, we have entered into a consignment agreement with Gordon Brothers for certain merchandise that is currently being sold through the specialty jewelry stores that we plan to close and for which Gordon Brothers has the ability to earn a percentage of the profits on the sale of such merchandise. Further, we have entered into a consulting agreement with Gordon Brothers to assist with the liquidation of the inventory in the department store based fine jewelry departments for which we will pay them a base fee.

In addition, we have retained the management consulting firm A&M to work with our board of directors and management in analyzing Finlay’s business strategies, plans and operations. David Coles, an A&M employee, is providing consulting services to our board of directors and management as the Holding Company’s Chief Restructuring Officer. Effective March 22, 2009, we completed the sale of certain assets to Bloomingdale’s. The assets included inventory and fixed assets for the 34 departments that we operated in Bloomingdale’s for a purchase price of approximately $33.4 million. The proceeds from this transaction were used to pay down a portion of the outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility.

As a result of the items discussed above, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $58.9 million in 2008 primarily for the impairment of fixed assets and intangible assets and the write-down of inventory, including the estimated loss on the sale of inventory to Bloomingdale’s. A portion of this charge has been recorded in cost of sales with the balance in income (loss) from operations. With respect to the exiting of the department store based business and the anticipated closing of approximately half of our specialty jewelry stores in 2009, we expect to record a pre-tax charge in the range of $12.0 to $15.0 million for severance and retention costs, lease termination costs and other items.

In 2008, we executed several agreements to exchange $159.4 million of its Senior Notes held by Participating Noteholders for new Third Lien Notes. In addition, the Participating Noteholders purchased $22.8 million of new Second Lien Notes. The refinancing of the Senior Notes enables us to eliminate a significant portion of the cash interest payment of $16.8 million that would have been payable annually on the Senior Notes as the Secured Notes include a PIK Interest feature until December 1, 2010.

In connection with our strategic plan, a majority of the holders of the Third Lien Notes entered into agreements with us and a majority of our trade vendors for $24.9 million of trade accounts payable to be secured in accordance with the terms of the Third Lien Notes. In addition, these trade vendors agreed to a deferred payment schedule through August 2009 of the outstanding amounts.

Total sales were $754.3 million in 2008 compared to $717.4 million in 2007, an increase of 5.2%. Total sales for 2008 included $309.7 million of sales generated by our stand-alone jewelry stores compared to $223.8 million in 2007. The increase primarily relates to the acquisition of Bailey Banks & Biddle in November 2007. Comparable store sales decreased 11% as a result of decreased consumer spending in a weak economic environment during the current year. Gross margin decreased by $29.9 million compared to 2007, and, as a percentage of sales, gross margin decreased by 6.2% from 45.2% to 39.0%. The decrease in gross margin primarily relates to the impairment charge of $24.3 million on the write-down of inventory as well as increased volume from the stand-alone jewelry stores at lower margins and lower margins at the Macy’s departments that closed in January 2009 and the Lord & Taylor departments scheduled to close at the end of April 2009, as we liquidated inventory during 2008 in anticipation of these closings. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased $47.5 million, and, as a percentage of sales, increased 4.2%, from 42.1% to 46.3%, primarily due to the impact of the stand-alone jewelry store leases at higher lease fees coupled with lower than anticipated sales levels as compared with the prior year. SG&A also includes severance costs of $1.2 million for field personnel associated with the Macy’s and Lord & Taylor store closings. Furthermore, income (loss) from operations in 2008 includes an impairment charge of $34.6 million primarily for the write down of fixed assets and intangible assets as compared to $3.0 million in 2007.

Borrowings under our Revolving Credit Agreement increased by $12.0 million at January 31, 2009 as compared to February 2, 2008, which reflects additional borrowings for working capital requirements. Our lowest level of availability during the year ended January 31, 2009 was $38.1 million ($8.1 million of excess availability after taking into consideration the $30.0 million minimum unused balance requirement under our Revolving Credit Agreement), at which point the outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement were $285.6 million. Refer to Note 8 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Strategies and Opportunities in the Specialty Jewelry Store Business

We plan to pursue the following key initiatives:

Implement our strategic plan;

Refinance or replace our Revolving Credit Agreement to improve liquidity;

Consolidate our specialty jewelry store businesses under one management team;

Reduce expenses;

Improve comparable store sales;

Focus on improved marketing initiatives to more efficiently reach and expand our customer base; and

Maintain high customer service standards.

Risks and Uncertainties

The risks and challenges facing our business include:

Our ability to continue as a going concern;

Implementation of our strategic plan;

Substantial debt leverage and our ability to identify a new banking relationship; and

Continued decrease in consumer discretionary spending in the current macro-economic environment and the impact on our liquidity needs.

The current banking and credit crisis, the high unemployment rate, continued home foreclosures, the rising cost of basic necessities, and the reality that the U.S. has entered a recession created a highly challenging retail environment during 2008 that we anticipate will continue through 2009. These conditions have negatively impacted our liquidity position and operating performance. There can be no assurances that the implementation of our strategic plan will be successful. There can be no assurances that our business operations, working capital and borrowing availability will be sufficient to meet current estimates of working capital requirements as well as allow us to maintain compliance with the $30.0 million minimum unused balance and other covenants required by the Revolving Credit Agreement. If we are unable to implement our strategic plan and improve our liquidity and/or operating performance, we may be required to further curtail our operations or pursue other available options, although we can provide no assurance that any such steps will allow us to meet our obligations as they become due.

We currently have a significant amount of debt. As of January 31, 2009, we had $40.6 million of debt outstanding under the Senior Notes, $169.0 million outstanding under the Third Lien Notes and $23.3 million outstanding under the Second Lien Notes. These debt instruments are all due on June 1, 2012. Additionally, at January 31, 2009, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were $236.2 million. We may not be able to refinance or restructure our long-term debt before it becomes due. Additionally, the net sales proceeds from the liquidation of inventory in the closing locations may not be sufficient to repay the outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility, which now matures in February 2010.

A continuation of the recent deterioration of significant portions of the global financial markets could further negatively impact our performance. Declines in discretionary spending or in the availability of consumer credit could further reduce the volume of merchandise we sell, as well as the sales prices for the merchandise offered, and accordingly, our gross margin. In addition, concerns about the stability of the U.S. financial markets generally have reduced the availability of funding to certain financial institutions, leading to a tightening of credit, reduction of business activity, and increased market volatility. These negative economic conditions may result in financial difficulties for our vendors, the department stores in which we operate and the financial institutions that are counterparties to our credit facilities, which could negatively affect us. It is not clear at this time what impact the federal government’s liquidity and funding initiatives that have been announced or that may be initiated in the future, will have on the financial markets, on the broader U.S. and global economies, or ultimately on us.

Results of Operations

The following discussion relates to our results of operations in 2008 and 2007 when both of our business segments were in operation. In 2009, we plan to exit the licensed department store based business and close approximately half of our specialty jewelry stores.

The following table sets forth operating results as a percentage of sales for the periods indicated. The discussion that follows should be read in conjunction with the following table:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
Statement of Operations Data:
Sales		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales (including an inventory write-down of $24.3 million, or 3.2%, in 2008)		61.0			54.8
Gross margin		39.0			45.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses		46.3			42.1
Impairment charges (1)		4.6			0.4
Depreciation and amortization		2.3			2.0
Income (loss) from operations		(14.2	)		0.7
Interest expense, net		5.0			4.1
Loss from continuing operations before
income taxes		(19.2	)		(3.4	)
Benefit for income taxes		(5.2	)		(1.3	)
Loss from continuing operations		(14.0	)		(2.1	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax in 2007 (2)		(0.2	)		0.7
Net income (loss)		(14.2	)%		(1.4	)%

(1)

Relates to the impairment of fixed assets, inventory and intangible assets.

(2)

Relates to the closing of 93 Macy’s departments at the end of 2008.

2008 Compared with 2007

Sales. Sales increased $37.0 million, or 5.2%, in 2008 compared to 2007. Sales include $444.6 million from the department store based fine jewelry departments which represented a 10.0% decrease compared to the $493.5 million in sales for 2007. Sales also include $309.7 million generated by our stand-alone specialty jewelry stores in 2008 compared to $223.8 million in 2007 (which includes sales from the date of acquisition of Bailey Banks & Biddle in November 2007). Comparable store sales decreased 11%.

During 2008, we opened four departments within existing host store groups, two Bailey Banks & Biddle stores and four new Carlyle stores. Additionally, in 2008, we closed 125 departments and four stand-alone jewelry stores. The openings were comprised of the following:

Store Group	Number of Locations
Bailey Banks & Biddle		2
Macy’s		3
Carlyle		4
Herberger’s		1
Total		10

The closings were comprised of the following:

Store Group	Number of Locations		Reason
Macy’s North and Northwest		93	Host decision to phase departments into existing Macy’s divisions.
Lord & Taylor		11	Department closings as a result of Lord & Taylor’s decision not to renew our license agreement.
Macy’s Central		10	Host decision to close these stores.
Dillard’s		8	Management’s decision to close unprofitable stores.
Gottschalks		2	Management’s decision to close unprofitable stores.
Carlyle		2	Management’s decision to close unprofitable stores.
Bailey Banks & Biddle		2	Management’s decision to close unprofitable stores.
Elder Beerman		1	Includes department closings within existing host store groups.
Total		129

Our major merchandise categories include diamonds, gold, gemstones, watches and designer jewelry. With respect to our stand-alone jewelry store business, diamond, watch and designer sales increased $32.7 million, $21.9 million and $10.3 million, respectively, or 47.1%, 28.1% and 29.4%, respectively, in 2008 compared to 2007, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Bailey Banks & Biddle in November 2007.

Gross margin. Gross margin decreased by $29.9 million in 2008 compared to 2007. As a percentage of sales, gross margin decreased by 6.2% from 45.2% to 39.0%. The components of this net decrease in gross margin are as follows:

Component	%			Reason
Impairment charge		(3.2	)%	Impairment charge on inventory and the estimated loss on the sale of inventory to Bloomingdale’s.
Merchandise cost of sales		(3.7	)	Increase in cost of sales is due to increase of stand-alone jewelry segment at lower gross margins as well as lower margins at the Macy’s departments that closed at year end 2008 and the Lord & Taylor departments that are scheduled to close at the end of April 2009, as we liquidate inventory.
Other		0.7		Decreases in various other components of cost of sales.
Net decrease		(6.2	)%

Selling, general and administrative expenses. The components of SG&A include payroll expense, license fees, rent expense, net advertising expenditures and other field and administrative expenses. SG&A increased $47.5 million, or 15.8%. SG&A dollars have increased as 2008 includes a full year of Bailey Banks & Biddle SG&A expenses. As a percentage of sales, SG&A increased by 4.2% from 42.1% to 46.3%. The components of this increase in SG&A are as follows:

Component	%			Reason
License and lease fees		1.0	%	Increase is primarily due to the impact of additional stand-alone jewelry store leases at higher lease fees as a percentage of sales, as a result of the Bailey Banks & Biddle acquisition.
Payroll expenses		1.7		Increase is primarily due to the unfavorable leverage of payroll expenses on lower sales.
Other		1.5		Increase is due to consulting fees totaling $1.7 million associated with the restructuring of the Senior Notes as well as unfavorable leveraging of expenses on lower sales.
Net increase		4.2	%

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased by $3.1 million primarily due to additional depreciation and amortization for capital expenditures for the most recent twelve months as well as the assets related to the Bailey Bank & Biddle acquisition and accelerated depreciation associated with the Macy’s and Lord & Taylor department closings, offset by the effect of certain assets becoming fully depreciated.

Impairment charges. In connection with our strategic plan, we recorded impairment charges totaling $34.6 million in the year ended January 31, 2009. Impairment charges of $28.2 million were recorded to reduce fixed assets to their estimated fair value due to the shorter period over which they will be in operation. Additionally, an impairment charge of $6.4 million was recorded to reflect intangible and other assets, primarily tradenames, at their fair value. During 2007, based on our annual assessment of the Congress goodwill, we determined that goodwill was impaired and an impairment of $3.0 million was recorded.

Interest expense, net. Interest expense increased by $8.0 million primarily as a result of higher average borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement. Average borrowings, including borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, the Senior Notes and the Secured Notes, increased to $515.4 million for the 2008 period compared to $346.7 million for the 2007 period. The weighted average interest rate on all outstanding borrowings was approximately 6.5% for 2008 compared to 8.0% for 2007. Included in 2008 is $10.1 million of PIK Interest related to the Secured Notes.

Benefit for income taxes. The income tax benefit for the 2008 and 2007 periods reflects effective tax rates of 27.1% and 37.8%, respectively. The 2008 benefit was reduced as a result of a required increase in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. The 2007 period reflects a benefit of approximately $1.2 million associated with impairment charges, compared to no benefit in 2008. Additionally, the 2008 and 2007 periods reflect benefits of approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, associated with the reversal of tax accruals no longer required.

Discontinued operations. Discontinued operations for 2008 includes the results of operations of the 93 Macy’s departments which closed in January 2009. Total sales generated from these departments in 2008 and 2007 were $108.5 million and $120.0 million, respectively. Discontinued operations for 2007 includes the 33 Parisian departments closed in July 2007. Sales related to these closed departments totaled $9.8 million in 2007. Gross margin, as a percentage of sales, related to discontinued departments decreased 8.2% from 47.4% in 2007 to 39.2% in 2008, as we liquidated inventory. The net loss from discontinued operations for 2008 was $2.0 million compared to net income from discontinued operations of $5.1 million during the comparable period in 2007.

Net income (loss). Net loss of $107.3 million for the 2008 period compares to net loss of $10.0 million in the prior period as a result of the factors discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As discussed above, in February 2009, we announced the adoption of our strategic plan to exit the licensed department store based business and close approximately half of our specialty jewelry stores in 2009. In conjunction with the adoption of this strategic plan, we amended our Revolving Credit Agreement in February 2009, as adjusted in March 2009, to reduce the Revolving Credit Agreement from $550.0 million to $266.6 million and to increase the interest rates thereunder. The amendment also requires us to comply with various milestones in connection with the strategic plan, to provide additional financial reporting to the lenders and to maintain compliance with a variance covenant from the approved restructuring budget. Additionally, the Revolving Credit Agreement now matures in February 2010. The net sales proceeds from the liquidation of inventory will be used to repay our outstanding balance under our Revolving Credit Facility in 2009.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the successful implementation of our strategic plan, the repayment of the amounts due under the Revolving Credit Facility and our ability to secure a new line of credit on or before the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Agreement. In addition, we experienced a significant operating loss in 2008 and are expected to have an operating loss in 2009. As discussed above, we are in default of certain covenants under the Revolving Credit Agreement. These uncertainties raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the independent auditor’s report accompanying our January 31, 2009 financial statements contains a going concern explanatory paragraph, which also constitutes a default under the Revolving Credit Agreement.

As a result of these defaults, the lenders under the Revolving Credit Agreement are no longer obligated to permit us to borrow under the facility or issue letters of credit for our account. We received a letter dated as of March 12, 2009, from General Electric Capital Corporation (as agent under the Revolving Credit Agreement) (“GE”), pursuant to which GE, on behalf of all the lenders, reserved all rights and remedies under the Revolving Credit Agreement. GE and the lenders may, but are not obligated to, continue to issue letters of credit and permit us to borrow under the Revolving Credit Facility and GE and the lenders may terminate the Revolving Credit Agreement and/or demand immediate repayment at any time.

If GE and the lenders were to demand immediate repayment, there can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain alternate financing on terms acceptable to us. In the event that we are unable to secure adequate borrowing under the Revolving Credit Agreement or an alternate financing source, our cash balance and cash flows from operations may be inadequate to meet our obligations, which may prevent us from operating. As a result of cross-default provisions, such acceleration would enable the holders of our long-term debt to declare a default and demand repayment as well.

Information about our financial position is presented in the following table:

	January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
	(dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,754		$	4,701
Working capital		157,499			214,773
Short-term debt		236,241			224,231
Long-term debt		232,947			200,000
Stockholder’s equity (deficiency)		(1,805	)		105,525

Our primary capital requirements are to repay the amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility and to fund working capital of go forward locations, as well as license fees to host store groups and rent payments for the stand-alone jewelry stores. For 2008 and 2007, capital expenditures totaled $24.7 million and $13.4 million, respectively, exclusive of fixed assets acquired.

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, were as follows:

	Fiscal Years Ended
	January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
	(dollars in thousands)
Operating Activities	$	1,292		$	73,298
Investing Activities		(30,346	)		(243,619	)
Financing Activities		27,107			173,318
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(1,947	)	$	2,997

Operating Activities

During 2009, the primary source of our liquidity is expected to be cash flows from operating activities as we liquidate inventory in the closing department store and specialty jewelry store locations as well as excess inventory in the go forward specialty jewelry stores. The key components of operating cash flow is merchandise sales. Operating cash outflows include payments to vendors for inventory, services and supplies, payments for employee payroll, license fees, rent and payments of interest and taxes. Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $1.3 million and $73.3 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. Inventory levels at January 31, 2009 decreased by $168.8 million, or 28%, as compared to February 2, 2008, primarily related to a decrease in inventory of $161.5 million in our licensed fine jewelry departments in anticipation of certain department closings at the end of 2008 and inventory write-down charges of $24.3 million associated with our strategic plan. Our strategy during 2008 was to reduce our owned inventory receipts and liquidate inventory in the closing departments, in an effort to reduce the on hand inventory levels and positively impact cash flows. Accounts receivable increased to $28.5 million from $13.8 million primarily related to increased sales in the closing departments in January 2009 as compared to the prior year. Additionally, the decrease in accounts payable to $34.1 million at January 31, 2009, from $110.5 million at February 2, 2008, reflects significantly reduced owned inventory receipts in 2008, lower consignment sales in the 2008 holiday season as compared to 2007 as well as the reduced payment terms required by our vendors compared with our historical credit terms.

Our operations involving licensed fine jewelry departments substantially preclude customer receivables as our license agreements typically require host stores to remit sales proceeds for each month (without regard to whether such sales were cash, store credit or national credit card) to us approximately three weeks after the end of such month. Additionally, at the end of 2008, approximately 20% of our merchandise was held on consignment. Our working capital balance was $157.5 million at January 31, 2009, a decrease of $57.3 million from February 2, 2008.

The seasonality of our business causes working capital requirements, and therefore, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement, to reach their highest level in the months of October, November and December in anticipation of the year-end holiday season. Accordingly, we experience seasonal cash needs as inventory levels peak.

Investing Activities

For 2008, net cash used in investing activities of $30.3 million primarily relates to cash used for capital expenditures. For 2007, net cash used in investing activities of $243.6 million primarily relates to the acquisition of Bailey Banks & Biddle, which accounted for $230.1 million of cash invested with a remaining amount of $5.6 million paid in February 2008. Capital expenditures in 2008 and 2007 totaling $24.7 million and $13.4 million, respectively, related primarily to expenditures for opening new locations and renovating existing locations.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $27.1 million in 2008, consisting primarily of proceeds from, and principal repayments on, the Revolving Credit Facility and proceeds from the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. Net cash provided by financing activities was $173.3 million in 2007, and was used primarily for the acquisition of Bailey Banks & Biddle.

The Revolving Credit Agreement, recently amended in February 2009, as adjusted in March 2009, provides us with a line of credit up to $266.6 million to finance working capital needs. Effective February 25, 2009, the loans under Tranche A (up to $229.1 million) will bear interest at a floating rate equal to a margin of 3.00% over the Index Rate or 4.75% over LIBOR. Additionally, Tranche B (up to $37.5 million) will bear interest at a floating rate equal to a margin of 5.50% over the Index Rate or 7.25% over LIBOR. Prior to February 25, 2009, the loans under Tranche A bore interest in accordance with a graduated pricing matrix based on the average excess availability under the facility for the previous quarter. Additionally, Tranche B bore interest at a floating rate equal to a margin of 3.50% over the Index Rate or 5.25% over LIBOR. The Index Rate is equal to the higher of (i) the federal funds rate plus 125 basis points and (ii) the publicly quoted rate as published by the Wall Street Journal as the “prime rate”. The weighted average interest rate was 5.0% and 7.5% for 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were $236.2 million at January 31, 2009, compared to $224.2 million at February 2, 2008. The average amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility were $310.1 million and $146.7 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. At January 31, 2009, we had $42.7 million of availability ($12.7 million of excess availability after taking into consideration the $30.0 million minimum unused balance requirement). Our lowest level of excess availability during 2008 was $38.1 million, at which point outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility were $285.6 million ($8.1 million of excess availability after taking into consideration the $30.0 million minimum unused balance requirement). The decrease in our borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility was primarily a result of inventory appraisals performed by our lenders at the end of 2008 as well as lower than anticipated sales from the 2008 holiday selling period. As a result of the liquidation in the locations we plan to close, the outstanding balance under the Revolving Credit Facility has been reduced from $236.2 million at the end of 2008 to approximately $130.0 million at the end of April 2009.

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary covenants, including limitations on, or relating to, liens, indebtedness, investments, mergers, acquisitions, affiliate transactions, management compensation and the payment of dividends and other restricted payments. As of January 31, 2009, the only financial covenant was the maintenance of a minimum of $30.0 million of availability under the facility. As of January 31, 2009, we were in compliance with this requirement. Effective with the February 2009 amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement, we now are required to achieve certain weekly targeted percentages of our sales and cash receipts and maintain cash disbursements below certain targeted percentages as set forth in our operating plan, and we are currently in default of this covenant. Although the lenders reserve all rights and remedies under the Revolving Credit Agreement and can accelerate repayment of the outstanding balance at any time, they have not exercised such rights at this time.

In 2008, we executed several agreements to exchange $159.4 million of our Senior Notes held by the Participating Noteholders for new Third Lien Notes. In addition, the Participating Noteholders purchased $22.8 million of new Second Lien Notes.

Interest on the Secured Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year. Interest on the Second Lien Notes began to accrue as of the issuance date and is payable beginning on June 1, 2009 in pay-in-kind interest or PIK Interest at 12.125% per annum from the issuance date until December 1, 2010, and thereafter in cash at 11.375% per annum. Interest on the Third Lien Notes began to accrue PIK Interest at 8.945% per annum as of June 1, 2008, which was paid in PIK Interest on December 1, 2008, and will be payable in PIK Interest at 8.945% per annum from December 2, 2008 until December 1, 2010, and thereafter in cash at 8.375% per annum. The PIK Interest on the Secured Notes is payable upon maturity of the Secured Notes. Interest on the Senior Notes continues to be payable in cash semi-annually on June 1 and December 1 of each year.

As a result of the above transactions, as of January 31, 2009, there were approximately $192.4 million of Secured Notes outstanding and $40.6 million of Senior Notes outstanding. The amounts required to satisfy the aggregate of our interest expense totaled $26.3 million and $28.9 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The refinancing of the Senior Notes enables us to eliminate a significant portion of the cash interest payment of $16.8 million that would have been payable annually on the Senior Notes as the Secured Notes include PIK Interest until December 1, 2010.

The indentures related to the Senior Notes and the Secured Notes contain restrictions relating to, among other things, the payment of dividends, redemptions or repurchases of capital stock, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the making of certain investments, the creation of certain liens, the sale of certain assets, entering into transactions with affiliates, engaging in mergers and consolidations and the transfer of all or substantially all assets. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of January 31, 2009.

Although we have been and continue to work closely with our vendors, several factors have impacted our ability to continue our historical credit terms, including our recent restructuring announcement, the Holding Company’s Common Stock being delisted from NASDAQ and the downgrade of our credit rating on the Senior Notes, coupled with the increase in our debt in conjunction with the acquisition of Bailey Banks & Biddle and recent bankruptcies in the retail and jewelry industries. During 2008, many of our key vendors reduced their historical credit terms with us based on our deteriorating liquidity situation. Further, many of these vendors are party to the secured position negotiated in February 2009 under the terms of the Third Lien Notes for $24.9 million of trade payable balances. Additional restrictions on the credit limits or payment terms that we have with our vendors could have an adverse impact on our liquidity position.

There can be no assurances that we can successfully implement our strategic plan or that the net sales proceeds will be sufficient to repay the outstanding balance under the Revolving Credit Facility. Additionally, there can be no assurances that we will be able to secure a new line of credit on or before the date of maturity of the Revolving Credit Agreement in February 2010, and, accordingly our liquidity and ability to timely pay our obligations when due could be adversely affected. If we cannot successfully implement our strategic plan, repay amounts due under the Revolving Credit Facility and secure such new financing, we may be unable to maintain a level of liquidity necessary to continue to operate our business.

Further, we are a highly leveraged company. We may not be able to refinance or restructure our long-term debt before it becomes due in 2012. A significant amount of our operating cash flows will be used to pay interest with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility, the Secured Notes (beginning on December 1, 2010) and the Senior Notes.

In November 2007, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and specified liabilities that comprised the Bailey Banks & Biddle division of Zale Corporation, a chain of 67 stand-alone retail stores in 24 states with a focus on the luxury market, offering jewelry and watches under high-end name brands. The purchase price of approximately $231.6 million, plus transaction fees of approximately $4.1 million, was financed with borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. Since the date of acquisition, Bailey Banks & Biddle’s cash requirements have been, and will continue to be, funded under the Revolving Credit Facility.

Seasonality

Our business is highly seasonal, with a significant portion of our sales and income from operations generated during the fourth quarter of each year, which includes the year-end holiday season. The fourth quarter of 2008 and 2007 each accounted for an average of approximately 41% of our annual sales. We have typically experienced net losses in the first three quarters of our fiscal year. During these periods, working capital requirements have been funded by borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement. Accordingly, the results for any of the first three quarters of any given fiscal year, taken individually or in the aggregate, are not indicative of annual results. See Note 18 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Inflation

The effect of inflation on our results of operations has not been material in the periods discussed.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our financial statements and related notes. We believe the application of our accounting policies, and the estimates inherently required therein, are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are periodically re-evaluated, as appropriate, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change. However, since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, actual results may differ from our estimates, and such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements. Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates. A summary of our significant accounting policies and a description of accounting policies that we believe are most critical may be found in Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Merchandise Inventories

We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market. The cost is determined by the LIFO method utilizing an internally generated index. We determine the LIFO cost on an interim basis by estimating annual inflation trends, annual purchases and ending inventory levels for the fiscal year. Actual annual inflation rates and inventory balances as of the end of any fiscal year may differ from interim estimates, and, as such, estimates are adjusted in the fourth quarter of each year. Factors related to inventories, such as future consumer demand and the economy’s impact on consumer discretionary spending, inventory aging, ability to return merchandise to vendors, merchandise condition and anticipated markdowns, are analyzed to determine estimated net realizable values. An adjustment is recorded to reduce the LIFO cost of inventories, if required, to their estimated net realizable values. Any significant unanticipated changes in the factors above could have a significant impact on the value of the inventories and our reported operating results. In 2008, we recorded an impairment charge of $24.3 million on inventory and the estimated loss on the sale of inventory to Bloomingdale’s. Adjustments to earnings resulting from changes in historical loss trends were insignificant for 2007.

We estimate inventory shrinkage for the period from the last inventory date to the end of the reporting period on a store-by-store basis. Our inventory shortage estimate can be affected by changes in merchandise mix and changes in actual shortage trends. The shrinkage rate from the most recent physical inventory, in combination with historical experience, is the basis for estimating shrinkage. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, our shrink reserve totaled $0.4 million in each year. Additionally, during 2008 and 2007, inventory shrinkage amounted to approximately 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively, of sales.

Vendor Allowances

We receive allowances from our vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements, including cooperative advertising. Vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction of cost of sales upon the sale of merchandise or SG&A when the purpose for which the vendor funds were intended to be used has been fulfilled. Accordingly, a reduction in vendor allowances received would increase our cost of sales and/or SG&A. In 2009, we expect to earn significantly lower levels of vendor allowances.

Vendor allowances have been accounted for in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Emerging Issues Task Force, Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor”. Vendor allowances provided as a reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to promote a vendor’s products are recorded as an SG&A reduction when the cost is incurred. All other vendor allowances are initially deferred with the deferred amounts recognized as a reduction in cost of sales when the related product is sold. In 2008 and 2007, $6.6 million and $8.1 million, respectively, of vendor allowances have been reflected as a reduction to cost of sales.

As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, deferred vendor allowances totaled (i) $5.4 million and $7.1 million, respectively, for owned merchandise, which allowances are included as an offset to merchandise inventories on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and (ii) $0.2 million and $4.4 million, respectively, for merchandise received on consignment, which allowances are included as deferred income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Long-Lived Assets

Our judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on market and operational performance. We assess the impairment of long-lived assets, primarily fixed assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

Significant changes in the manner of our use of assets or the strategy for our overall business;

Significant negative industry or economic trends; or

Store closings.

When we determine that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we recognize an impairment loss at the time the undiscounted estimated future net cash flows expected to be generated by an asset (or group of assets) is less than its carrying value. We measure impairment losses as the amount by which the asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. To the extent future cash flows are less than anticipated, additional impairment charges may result.

As a result of our strategic plan, we evaluated our long-lived assets for potential impairment as of January 31, 2009. The evaluation considered information available at January 31, 2009, and resulted in the determination that the carrying value of the fixed assets of our licensed department stores and certain unprofitable specialty store locations would likely not be recovered through estimated future cash flows, considering assumptions regarding the expected lives of those assets. As a result, we recorded an asset impairment charge of $28.2 million to reduce the carrying value of fixed assets to their estimated fair value due to the shorter period over which they will be in operation. Additionally, an impairment charge of $6.4 million was recorded to reflect intangible and other assets, primarily tradenames, at their fair value. In 2007, we recorded an impairment charge of $3.0 million to write-off the goodwill related to Congress.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue upon the sale of merchandise, either owned or consigned, to our customers, net of anticipated returns and net of sales taxes collected. The provision for sales returns is based on historical evidence of our return rate. As of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, our allowance for sales returns totaled $2.1 million in each year. Adjustments to earnings resulting from revisions to estimates on our sales return provision have been insignificant for 2008 and 2007. Layaway deposits are not recognized as sales until fully paid for by the customer and the customer claims the merchandise.

Self-insurance Reserves

We are self-insured for medical and workers’ compensation claims up to certain maximum liability amounts. Although the amounts accrued are determined based on an analysis of historical trends of losses, settlements, litigation costs and other factors, the amounts that we will ultimately disburse could differ materially from the accrued amounts. Self-insurance reserves aggregated $8.8 million and $7.7 million at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively.

Income Taxes

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes,” income taxes must be accounted for by the asset/liability method. The income tax effects of all revenues, expenses, gains, losses and other events that create differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their amounts for financial reporting are required to be recognized. Inherent in the measurement of these tax effects are certain judgments and interpretations of existing tax law and other published guidance as applied to our operations. Our effective tax rate considers management’s judgment of expected tax liabilities in the various taxing jurisdictions within which it is subject to tax. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized. Due to continued losses, a valuation allowance in the amount of $17.4 million was required at January 31, 2009. At any given time, multiple tax years are open to audit by various taxing authorities. The recorded amounts of income tax are subject to adjustment upon audit, changes in interpretation and changes in judgment utilized in determining estimates.

Accounting for Acquisitions

In November 2007, we completed the acquisition of Bailey Banks & Biddle. This acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. As such, we completed our analysis of the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets and liabilities.

Accounting Standards Adopted in 2008: On February 3, 2008, we adopted certain provisions of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets a framework for measuring fair value and expands on required disclosures about fair value measurement. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 relate to financial assets and liabilities as well as other assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis and did not have any effect on our consolidated financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to other nonfinancial assets and liabilities were effective for us on February 1, 2009, and will be applied prospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact that these additional SFAS No. 157 provisions will have on our consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements: In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP No. 142-3”). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently assessing the potential effect of FSP No. 142-3 on our consolidated financial statements.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical information provided herein are forward-looking statements and may contain information about financial results, economic conditions, trends and known uncertainties. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words like "strategy," "expect," "plan," "believe," "will," "estimate," "intend," "project," "goals," "target," "anticipating," "hope" and other words of similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. The forward-looking statements contained herein are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performances or achievements to differ materially from those reflected in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to:

Our ability to successfully implement our strategic plan to exit the licensed department store based business and close approximately half of our specialty jewelry stores;

Our high degree of leverage and our ability to refinance our long-term debt and/or obtain a new revolving line of credit to operate our go forward specialty jewelry stores;

Our ability to continue as a going concern;

Low or negative growth in the economy or in the financial markets which reduces discretionary spending on goods perceived to be luxury items;

Our senior management team is in transition;

Our ability to renegotiate certain on going leases for specialty jewelry stores on more favorable terms or to negotiate new leases with acceptable terms;

The seasonality of the retail jewelry business;

Our ability to continue to obtain merchandise from our vendors on acceptable credit terms;

The impact of fluctuations in gold and diamond prices;

Competition in the retail jewelry business and fluctuations in our quarterly results;

The availability to us of alternate sources of merchandise supply in the case of an abrupt loss of any significant supplier;

Our ability to identify and rapidly respond to fashion trends as well as our ability to maintain flexible return privileges on owned merchandise;

Our ability to increase comparable store sales;

Our compliance with applicable contractual covenants;

Changes in regulatory requirements which are applicable to our business;

The impact of future claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business; and

Attacks or threats of attacks by terrorists or war which may negatively impact the economy and/or the financial markets and reduce discretionary spending.

Readers are cautioned not to unduly rely on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis, judgment, belief or expectation only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In addition to the disclosure contained herein, readers should carefully review any disclosure of risks and uncertainties contained in other documents we file or have filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk through the interest rate on our borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement, which has a variable interest rate. Based on the average amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility for 2008, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $3.1 million in 2008. In seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, we manage exposures through our regular operating and financing activities.

Commodity Risk

We principally address commodity risk through retail price points. Our commodity risk exposure to diamond, gold and other merchandise categories relates to market price fluctuations and we currently do not engage in any hedging activities.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008	F-4

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity (Deficiency) and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008	F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008	F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008	F-8

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

We have had no disagreements with our independent registered public accounting firm regarding accounting or financial disclosure matters.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page F-2 of this report and is incorporated herein by reference.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover every situation involving the failure of persons within Finlay Jewelry to disclose material information required to be set forth in our periodic reports.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, also conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter ended January 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there was no such change during the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all controls systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Finlay Jewelry have been detected. We conduct periodic evaluations of our controls to enhance, where necessary, our procedures and controls. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 9B. Other Information

Finlay Executive Severance Pay Plan

The Finlay Executive Severance Pay Plan (the “Severance Plan”) was amended and restated effective December 31, 2008, and further amended and restated effective March 19, 2009. The Severance Plan is a retention tool to encourage executives of Finlay Jewelry and Finlay Merchandising & Buying, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Finlay Jewelry (“FM&B”) to remain focused on the business, by providing temporary and short-term benefits to eligible “executive” employees whose employment with Finlay Jewelry or Finlay Merchandising & Buying, Inc. is involuntarily terminated in connection with a layoff or reduction in force and who are not offered comparable employment with one of Finlay’s affiliates or subsidiaries.

The Severance Plan does not provide for severance benefits in the event an executive resigns, quits or retires, or is covered by an employment agreement that provides for severance. Certain of Finlay’s named executive officers are eligible to receive severance benefits under the Severance Plan in the event of a covered termination.

Under the Severance Plan, benefits for an involuntarily terminated executive will equal a multiple of the executive's weekly base salary at his or her then current rate as of his or her date of termination, as described below, reduced by any compensation paid to the executive in lieu of any notice period required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act or applicable laws.

Service (1)		Benefit

Ÿ Less than two (2) years		Four (4) weeks

Ÿ Two (2) years but less than five (5) years		Six (6) weeks

Ÿ Five (5) years but less than ten (10) years		Eight (8) weeks

Ÿ Ten (10) years but less than fifteen (15) years		Twelve (12) weeks

Ÿ Fifteen (15) years but less than twenty (20) years		Sixteen (16) weeks

Ÿ Twenty (20) years but less than twenty-five (25) years		Eighteen (18) weeks

Ÿ Twenty-five (25) years but less than thirty (30) years		Twenty (20) weeks

Ÿ Thirty (30) years or more		Twenty-six (26) weeks

(1) "Service" means an executive's completed full years of employment as of the last anniversary of the last date of hire of the executive.

Any benefit under the Severance Plan in excess of eight weeks to an executive whose annual base salary was $75,000 or greater on his or her date of termination (the "Mitigated Benefits") will be reduced by an amount equal to the gross amounts received or earned by the executive from employment or engagement in any other business or activity during the period for which the Mitigated Benefits are payable ("Other Income"). As a condition to receipt of payment of the Mitigated Benefits, the executive shall, no later than seven days prior to the date such payment is due, certify in writing all amounts of Other Income earned by the executive during the preceding payroll period so that the appropriate offsets can be made.

An executive who accepts severance payments under the Severance Plan will also be required to sign a release.

The Severance Plan provides that all severance benefits will be provided in a manner intended to comply with, or be exempt from, Section 409A of the Code.

The foregoing description of the Severance Plan is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the plan itself, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.22 to this Form 10-K and is incorporated by reference into this Item 9B.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Set forth below is certain information with respect to each of the current executive officers and directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry. Each of the persons listed as a director is a member of the Board of Directors of both the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry.

Name	Age	Position
Arthur E. Reiner	68	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Holding Company, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Finlay Jewelry and Director
Joseph M. Melvin	58	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Holding Company and President and Chief Operating Officer of Finlay Jewelry
Leslie A. Philip	62	Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry
Joyce Manning Magrini	54	Executive Vice President – Administration of Finlay Jewelry
Bruce E. Zurlnick	57	Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry
David B. Cornstein	70	Director
Rohit M. Desai	70	Director
Louis Lipschitz	64	Director
Norman S. Matthews	76	Director
Thomas M. Murnane	62	Director

Under the Holding Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Holding Company’s Board of Directors is classified into three classes. The members of each class serve staggered three-year terms. Messrs. Desai, Lipschitz and Murnane are Class I directors; Messrs. Cornstein and Reiner are Class II directors; and Mr. Matthews is a Class III director. The terms of the Class II, Class III and Class I directors expire at the Holding Company’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. Officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

The business experience, principal occupations and employment of each of the executive officers and directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry, together with their periods of service as executive officers and directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry, are set forth below.

Arthur E. Reiner has been a director of the Holding Company since 1995, became Chairman of the Holding Company effective February 1, 1999 and, from January 1995 to such date, served as Vice Chairman of the Holding Company. Mr. Reiner has also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Holding Company since January 30, 1996 and as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Finlay Jewelry since January 3, 1995. Prior to joining Finlay, Mr. Reiner spent over 30 years with the Macy’s organization. From February 1992 to October 1994, Mr. Reiner was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Macy’s East, a subsidiary of Macy’s. From 1988 to 1992, Mr. Reiner was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Macy’s Northeast, which was combined with Macy’s Atlanta division to form Macy’s East in 1992. Mr. Reiner is also a director of New York & Company, Inc.

Joseph M. Melvin has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Holding Company and President and Chief Operating Officer of Finlay Jewelry since May 1, 1997. From September 1975 to March 1997, Mr. Melvin served in various positions with May, including, from 1990 to March 1997, as Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Filene’s (a division of May). Mr. Melvin plans to retire from Finlay on June 30, 2009.

Leslie A. Philip has been Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry since May 1997. From May 1995 to May 1997, Ms. Philip was Executive Vice President-Merchandising and Sales Promotion of Finlay Jewelry. From 1993 to May 1995, Ms. Philip was Senior Vice President--Advertising and Sales Promotion of Macy’s, and from 1988 to 1993, Ms. Philip was Senior Vice President--Merchandise--Fine Jewelry at Macy’s. Ms. Philip held various other positions at Macy’s from 1970 to 1988. Ms. Philip plans to retire from Finlay on May 26, 2009.

Joyce Manning Magrini has been Executive Vice President - Administration of Finlay Jewelry since June 2005. From March 1999 to June 2005, Ms. Magrini was Senior Vice President of Human Resources of Finlay Jewelry and from January 1995 to February 1999, Ms. Magrini was Vice President of Human Resources. Ms. Magrini held various human resources and customer service positions at Macy’s from June 1978 through December 1994.

Bruce E. Zurlnick has been Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry since January 2000. From June 1990 to December 1999, he was Treasurer of the Holding Company and Vice President and Treasurer of Finlay Jewelry. From December 1978 through May 1990, Mr. Zurlnick held various finance and accounting positions with Finlay Jewelry’s predecessors.

David B. Cornstein has been Chairman Emeritus of the Holding Company since his retirement from day-to-day involvement with the Holding Company effective January 31, 1999. He served as Chairman of the Holding Company from May 1993 until his retirement, and has been a director of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry since their inception in December 1988. Mr. Cornstein is a Principal of Pinnacle Advisors Limited. From December 1988 to January 1996, Mr. Cornstein was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Holding Company. From December 1985 to December 1988, Mr. Cornstein was President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of a predecessor of the Holding Company. He is also a director of Circa, Inc.

Rohit M. Desai has been a director of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry since May 1993. Mr. Desai is the founder of and, since its formation in 1984, has been Chairman and President of Desai Capital Management Incorporated, a specialized equity investment management firm in New York which managed the assets of various institutional clients. Since its inception, it has sponsored four institutional investment partnerships, each with committed capital between $325.0 million and $410.0 million. All of these partnerships have now successfully completed their investment programs. Mr. Desai serves as a director of Atlas Acquisition Holdings Corp. and Alphatec Holdings, Inc.

Louis Lipschitz has been a director of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry since December 2006. Mr. Lipschitz retired from his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Toys “R” Us, Inc. in March 2004. He currently serves on the boards of The Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc., Forward Industries, Inc., Majesco Entertainment Company and New York & Company, Inc.

Norman S. Matthews has been a director of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry since July 1993. Mr. Matthews has been a retail consultant based in New York for more than the past five years. Mr. Matthews served as Vice Chairman and then President of Federated Department Stores from 1983 to 1988. He is also a director of The Progressive Corporation, Henry Schein, Inc. and The Children’s Place Retail Stores, Inc.

Thomas M. Murnane has been a director of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry since December 2002. Mr. Murnane is a retired partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, serving in various capacities during his tenure with that firm since 1980, including Director of the firm’s Retail Strategy Consulting Practice, Director of Overall Strategy Consulting for the East Region of the United States, and Global Director of Marketing and Brand Management for PwC Consulting. Mr. Murnane is currently a co-principal and co-owner of ARC Business Advisors, a privately-held, boutique consulting firm. He is also a director of The Pantry, Inc. and Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.

Codes of Ethics

Finlay has adopted Codes of Ethics that apply to all of our directors and employees including, without limitation, our CEO, our CFO and all of our employees performing financial or accounting functions. The Codes of Ethics are posted on the Holding Company’s Web site, www.finlayenterprises.com, under the heading “Governance”. The Holding Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of its Codes of Ethics by posting such information on its Web site at the location specified above. However, the Holding Company may elect to disclose any such amendment or waiver in a report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission either in addition to or in lieu of the Web site disclosure. The Holding Company will provide to any person without charge, upon request addressed to the Corporate Secretary at Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation, 529 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017, a copy of the Codes of Ethics.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committees of the Boards of Directors consist of the following members of the Board of Directors of each of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry: Rohit M. Desai, Louis Lipschitz and Thomas M. Murnane, each of whom is an “independent director” under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) and Commission regulations applicable to audit committee members. The Boards of Directors of both the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry have determined that Mr. Lipschitz, Chairman of the Audit Committees, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

For purposes of this Executive Compensation discussion and the related executive compensation tables in this Item 11, references to the “Board of Directors” refer to the Holding Company’s Board of Directors, and references to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry collectively.

General

Compensation policies for our senior officers are overseen by the Holding Company’s Compensation Committee (referred to as the “Committee” for purposes of this Executive Compensation discussion). The principal functions of the Committee are to review and approve the compensation of our senior officers, based on formal performance evaluations, and review and recommend to the Board of Directors the compensation for non-employee directors. The Committee also makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to targets and awards under our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans. Except with respect to our incentive compensation and equity-based plans for which the Committee makes recommendations for approval by the Board of Directors, the Committee makes all executive compensation determinations which it then reports to the full Board of Directors for ratification.

The members of the Committee are appointed by the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Holding Company’s Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee. In addition to being independent under Nasdaq listing standards, each Committee member is also a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter is available on our Web site, www.finlayenterprises.com, under “Governance”. While the charter permits the Committee to engage the services of a compensation consultant with respect to executive and/or director compensation matters, the Committee decided not to retain a consultant for 2008 and does not currently plan to engage one for 2009.

Compensation Committee Process

As noted above, the Committee retains the authority to determine senior officer compensation. In the course of administering our executive compensation programs, the Committee does, however, routinely seek the recommendations and assistance of our management in gathering relevant compensation information and preparing individual performance assessments. The Committee also requests that management provide various coordination and administrative services, such as scheduling meetings and distributing meeting materials. The Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel and Executive Vice President-Administration attend and participate in every Committee meeting, although no senior officer is present when the Committee is deliberating with respect to his or her own compensation. The Chief Executive Officer participates fully with the Committee in assessing the performance of the senior officers and in making recommendations on the level of compensation for each pay component.

During 2008 and prior years, the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer was fixed by his employment agreement, which expired in accordance with its terms on January 31, 2009, and was replaced by a retention bonus agreement, effective as of March 6, 2009. For the compensation of the remaining senior officers, the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President-Administration make recommendations to the Committee that generally, after discussion, are approved with minor adjustments. With respect to equity compensation awards, the Committee makes equity grants, generally based upon guidance from the Chief Executive Officer. However, in September 2003, the Committee delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer to grant at his discretion, on an annual basis, equity awards under the Holding Company’s stock incentive plans for up to 15,000 shares in the aggregate. The Chief Executive Officer has not exercised this delegated authority to date, and all equity awards have been granted solely by the Committee.

Components of Executive Compensation

During 2008 and prior years, our executive compensation program included a mix of short-term and long term incentives, consisting of base salary, the potential for annual cash incentive compensation in the form of performance bonuses, the potential for long term incentive compensation in the form of stock options and restricted stock grants, the ability to participate in the Holding Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (the “Executive Deferred Compensation Plan”), and limited supplemental executive benefits. The Chief Executive Officer’s compensation mix was established by his employment agreement.

Due to the limited liquidity of the Holding Company’s Common Stock, base salary and cash incentive compensation may have represented a higher percentage of total compensation for our executive officers than was the case with our competitors. In 2008, in recognition of a challenging economic environment and the impact of host-store consolidations on our business, the Committee approved a reduction in our annual cash incentive compensation program. In 2009, the Committee determined that there would be no annual cash incentive compensation and approved additional reductions in certain executive severance benefits.

Compensation of Chief Executive Officer

Through the end of 2008, Mr. Reiner’s compensation was governed by the terms of his employment agreement dated as of January 30, 2005 and amended March 11, 2008 and April 25, 2008. The term of that agreement was January 30, 2005 to January 31, 2009. As our Chief Executive Officer is in a unique position to help us achieve our annual and long term goals, his higher compensation is reflective of that role as well as his years of experience and historical accomplishments. For 2006 through 2008, his employment agreement provided for the payment of a minimum annual base salary of $1,005,000 and an annual award of time-vesting restricted stock in an amount equal to $500,000. In addition, Mr. Reiner was entitled to receive a cash bonus (“Cash Incentive Compensation”) and nonrestricted stock (“Stock Incentive Compensation” and collectively with the Cash Incentive Compensation, the “Incentive Compensation”) based on the attainment of financial objectives approved by the Committee and ratified by the Board of Directors. On April 25, 2008, Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement was amended to provide for his participation in the 2008 annual cash bonus pool established under the Holding Company’s Cash Bonus Plan in lieu of the Cash Incentive Compensation otherwise payable under his employment agreement with respect to 2008.

The term of Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement expired in accordance with its terms on January 31, 2009. We have not entered into a replacement employment agreement with Mr. Reiner. However, on March 11, 2009, Mr. Reiner and the Holding Company entered into a retention bonus agreement, providing for Mr. Reiner to receive two retention bonus payments of $500,000 each in 2009, in lieu of approximately $2,100,000 in certain severance benefits to which Mr. Reiner would otherwise have been entitled under the terms of his employment agreement. The first $500,000 payment was made on March 11, 2009, and the second $500,000 payment was made on April 1, 2009.

Summary Compensation Table

Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2009

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each of our named executive officers during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)			Stock Awards ($) (4)			Option Awards ($) (5)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($) (8)		Total ($)
Arthur E. Reiner Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Holding Company and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Finlay Jewelry	2008	$	1,005,000		500,000	(1)	$	140,484			--		--		--	$	82,784	$	1,728,268
	2007		1,005,000		500,000	(2)		451,393			--		--		--		83,396		2,039,789
Bruce E. Zurlnick Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry	2008		315,500		--			30,748			11,917		--		--		12,602		370,767
	2007		310,000		--			57,540			1,986		--		--		12,052		381,578
Joseph M. Melvin Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Holding Company and President and Chief Operating Officer of Finlay Jewelry	2008		458,556		226,028	(3)		46,841			21,450		--		--		12,611		765,486
	2007		452,056		--			95,762			3,575		--		--		12,052		563,445
Leslie A. Philip Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry	2008		478,690		235,845	(3)		24,172			21,450		--		--		13,853		774,010
	2007		471,690		--			79,797			3,575		--		--		13,294		568,356
Joyce M. Magrini Executive Vice President – Administration of Finlay Jewelry	2008		330,000		162,500	(3)		33,254			11,917		--		--		11,531		549,202
	2007		325,000		--			63,680			1,986		--		--		10,972		401,638
Edward J. Stein Former Senior Vice President and Director of Stores of Finlay Jewelry (6)	2008		169,941		--			17,628	(7)		--		--		--		656,047		843,616
	2007		390,056		--			79,890			1,192		--		--		13,294		484,432

(1)	This amount represents the cash payment to Mr. Reiner in February 2009 of his Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonus award for 2008 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as modified by the agreement to pay in cash for 2008.

(2)	This amount represents the cash payment to Mr. Reiner in February 2008 of his Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonus award for 2007 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as modified by the agreement to pay in cash for 2007.

(3)	This amount represents a special retention bonus equal to 50% of the executive’s then-current base salary, pursuant to the terms of the executive’s employment agreement. The bonus was paid on July 25, 2008 to these executives.

(4)

The amounts in this column reflect the compensation expense of restricted stock and matching restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted under the Holding Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan (adopted in 1993) (the “1993 Plan”), 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”) and/or 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”) for financial reporting purposes for 2008 and 2007, respectively, and may include amounts from awards granted in and prior to the respective fiscal year. These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these awards, and do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the assumptions made in determining SFAS No. 123(R) “Stock-Based Compensation” values.

(5)

The amounts in this column reflect the compensation expense of stock options granted under the 1993, 1997 and/or 2007 Plans for financial reporting purposes for 2008 and 2007, respectively, and may include amounts from awards granted in and prior to the respective fiscal year. These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these awards, and do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the assumptions made in determining SFAS No. 123(R) “Stock-Based Compensation” values.

(6)	Mr. Stein retired on June 23, 2008.

(7)	This amount includes a reversal of $7,220 in compensation expense previously recognized in connection with RSUs awarded in 2005 and 2006 which Mr. Stein forfeited in connection with his retirement.

(8)	The amounts in this column for 2008 are reflected in the All Other Compensation table below, which includes perquisites, employee benefits and company matching contributions to the 401(k) plan and, in the case of Mr. Stein, payments required pursuant to his Severance Agreement and General Release.

All Other Compensation

Name	Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits ($)			Tax Gross-Ups and Reimbursements ($)			Medical Benefits ($) (3)		Company Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans ($) (4)		Company-paid Insurance Premiums ($) (5)		Severance Benefits ($) (6)		Total ($)
Arthur E. Reiner	$	8,714	(1)	$	30,282	(2)	$	-	$	5,750	$	38,038	$	-	$	82,784
Bruce E. Zurlnick		--			--			4,539		5,750		2,313		--		12,602
Joseph M. Melvin		--			--			4,539		5,750		2,322		--		12,611
Leslie A. Philip		--			--			4,539		5,750		3,564		--		13,853
Joyce M. Magrini		--			--			4,539		5,750		1,242		--		11,531
Edward J. Stein		--			--			2,270		--		1,485		652,292		656,047

(1)	This amount reflects the portion of the car allowance provided to Mr. Reiner that relates to his personal rather than business use.

(2)	This amount reflects tax equalization payments made in connection with life insurance premiums paid by us on behalf of Mr. Reiner.

(3)	Amounts in this column reflect the insurance premiums paid in respect of the named executive officer under the Executive Medical Reimbursement Plan.

(4)	Amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of all matching contributions under our 401(k) plan allocated to the account of each named executive officer.

(5)	Amounts in this column reflect insurance premiums paid by us with respect to life insurance for the benefit of each named executive officer.

(6)	Amounts in this column reflect payments required pursuant to Mr. Stein’s Severance Agreement and General Release in connection with his retirement on June 23, 2008, for severance ($595,420), interest on the severance payment ($6,872), and a relocation allowance ($50,000).

Base Salaries

We believe we must offer a competitive base salary in order to retain talented senior officers. For this reason, base salary constitutes a significant portion of each named executive officer’s total compensation. It is the Committee’s objective to maintain base salaries that are reflective of the individual executive’s experience, position, responsibility level and performance, and that are generally competitive with salary levels of executives at other companies engaged in the same or similar lines of business with revenues in a range comparable to those of the Holding Company. The Committee monitors the salaries of all Senior Vice Presidents and above following the close of each fiscal year and makes annual adjustments as it deems necessary and appropriate based, except with respect to his own base salary, on compensation recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer. As part of Finlay’s expense reduction efforts during the past few years, none of the named executive officers received annual base salary increases for 2006 or 2007. However, the named executive officers other than Mr. Reiner each received a cost of living adjustment in annual base salary, effective August 1, 2008. For 2008, Mr. Reiner’s base salary was fixed by the terms of his employment agreement and he continues to receive the same annual base salary in 2009.

Annual Cash Bonuses

Annual cash bonuses for our named executive officers are awarded under the Holding Company’s Cash Bonus Plan approved by the Holding Company’s stockholders in 2004 and again in 2007, and are formula-driven. The Cash Bonus Plan is intended to provide annual incentives to executive officers in a manner designed to reinforce our performance goals, to link a significant portion of the executives’ compensation to the achievement of such goals, and to continue to attract, motivate and retain key executives on a competitive basis, while seeking to preserve for our benefit, to the extent practicable, the associated Federal income tax deduction for payments of qualified ‘‘performance-based’’ compensation.

Under the Cash Bonus Plan, the Committee does not have discretion to increase bonus amounts over the level determined by application of the performance goal formula(s) and is required to certify, prior to payment, that the performance goals underlying the bonus payments have been satisfied. However, in limited circumstances, the Committee does have the ability to adjust the performance goals to account for extraordinary events. For 2007 and prior years, the bonus opportunity for each executive officer under the Cash Bonus Plan for each performance period was related by a specific formula to the executive officer’s base salary at the start of the performance period, provided that the maximum bonus paid under the plan to any individual in respect of any fiscal year could not exceed $2.0 million. Since the Cash Bonus Plan was established in 2004, no bonus payout to an executive officer other than the Chief Executive Officer under the plan has exceeded $300,000 in any single fiscal year. The Chief Executive Officer’s annual cash bonus through 2008 was governed by the terms of his employment agreement. However, the Cash Bonus Plan was adopted with the intent for the Chief Executive Officer’s annual cash bonuses to be awarded under the plan whenever possible. The Chief Executive Officer’s Cash Incentive Compensation has been awarded under the Cash Bonus Plan since the plan was adopted, and has not exceeded $1.1 million in any single fiscal year.

The Committee selected EBITA (defined as earnings before interest, taxes and amortization of goodwill on a FIFO basis) as the performance measure for the Chief Executive Officer’s incentive compensation when negotiating his employment agreement in January 2005. Consistent with the Committee’s belief that annual cash bonuses for all executive officers should be governed by the same measures of our performance, EBITA is the performance measure applied to all executive officer incentive compensation. The Committee selected this performance measure because it believes that EBITA is a measure of our performance that the senior management team can most directly influence.

Historically, following the close of the prior fiscal year, the Committee determined the level of performance achieved with respect to the prior year’s cash bonus award targets and established the cash bonus incentive targets for the new fiscal year (the “Target Level”).

Under the Cash Bonus Plan, for 2007 and prior years, if EBITA was 100% of the Target Level, cash bonuses would be payable to each of the named executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer whose incentive compensation formula was set forth in his employment agreement) in the amount of 60% of each executive officer’s then-current base salary. Consistent with the plan’s purpose of rewarding company performance, there was no maximum amount that could be earned under this award formula, other than the stated plan maximum. The incentive targets would not result in a payout if our performance was below 80% of the Target Level. These targets were scaled so that if EBITA was 80% of the Target Level, cash bonuses would be payable in the amount of 20% of each executive officer’s then-current base salary, and if EBITA exceeded 80%, then the bonus payout would be 20% of the executive officer’s base salary plus 2% for each percentage point by which EBITA exceeded 80% of the Target Level. Receipt of any cash incentive compensation under this plan was contingent on the executive officer’s continued employment through the payment date.

As provided in his employment agreement for 2007 and prior years, the target amount of Mr. Reiner’s annual Cash Incentive Compensation was based on his base salary at the beginning of the year, with the actual amount determined by the extent to which the target EBITA level was met for such year. The target EBITA level for each year had to be determined by the Committee during the first 90 days of the fiscal year and could subsequently be adjusted by the Committee to reflect material changes (such as acquisitions or divestitures) that were not anticipated at the time the target level was established. According to Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement, if EBITA in any fiscal year was 80% of the Target Level, his Cash Incentive Compensation would be 33.333% of his base salary. If EBITA exceeded 80% of the Target Level, the percentage payable would increase 3.333% for each percentage point by which EBITA exceeded 80% of the Target Level. Under this formula, if EBITA for 2007 was 100% of the Target Level, Mr. Reiner would earn a cash bonus in the amount of 100% of his 2007 base salary. If EBITA levels exceeded 100% of the Target Level, Mr. Reiner’s Cash Incentive Compensation could exceed his base salary. Mr. Reiner was not entitled to any Cash Incentive Compensation payment for any fiscal year in which EBITA was less than 80% of the Target Level for such fiscal year. Because EBITA for 2007 was below the minimum performance level required under the Cash Bonus Plan, none of the named executive officers received cash bonuses under the Cash Bonus Plan for 2007.

In April 2008, the Committee approved a reduced bonus program under the Cash Bonus Plan for 2008 in recognition of the challenging economic environment and the impact of host-store consolidations. The reduced bonus program formula applied to all eligible executive officers under the Cash Bonus Plan, including Mr. Reiner, and made it significantly more difficult for executives to earn an annual cash bonus than in prior years.

For bonus opportunities for 2008 under the Cash Bonus Plan, the Committee established guidelines for an annual cash bonus pool that could be paid for 2008, rather than tying cash bonus awards solely to the participant’s base salary based on his or her achievement of the selected performance goal. Under the cash bonus pool, cash bonus awards would be paid for 2008 only if Finlay Jewelry’s performance exceeded 100% of the target level of EBITA, rather than 80%. For 2008, the potential cash bonus payout for each executive officer was based on a percentage of the overall bonus pool, with the individual percentages determined by the Committee using a formula that took into account the individual’s 2008 base salary and the percentage of base salary the individual was entitled to receive as a cash bonus for 2007 for achieving 100% of the Target Level of EBITA.

The overall amount of the bonus pool was determined based on the achievement by Finlay Jewelry of the Target Level for 2008, as follows:

	(i)	if EBITA was less than or equal to 100% of the Target Level, then the bonus pool was zero;

	(ii)	if EBITA exceeded 100% of the Target Level, the bonus pool consisted of the following:

(a)

100% of the amount by which EBITA exceeded 100% of the Target Level up to $2.0 million;

(b)

50% of the amount by which EBITA exceeded 100% of the Target Level from $2.0 million to $3.0 million; and

(c)

25% of the amount by which EBITA exceeded 100% of the Target Level above $3.0 million.

Along with the other eligible participants in the Cash Bonus Plan, each of Messrs. Reiner, Zurlnick and Melvin, and Mmes. Philip and Magrini were entitled to receive annual cash bonuses for 2008 equal to a specified percentage of the overall bonus pool for 2008. Mr. Stein was not eligible to participate in the Cash Bonus Plan for 2008.

Because EBITA for 2008 was below the minimum performance level required under the Cash Bonus Plan, none of the named executive officers received cash bonuses under the Cash Bonus Plan for 2008. In connection with the decline in our department store based business over the past several years, the challenging economic conditions under which we are currently operating, and the strategic plan we announced in February 2009, the Committee determined that there would be no Cash Bonus Plan for 2009.

The Committee has not historically granted discretionary cash bonuses to executive officers outside of the Cash Bonus Plan.

Equity Incentives

Historically, the primary form of equity compensation that we awarded consisted of stock options. However, beginning in 2003, in recognition of the trend among companies toward other forms of equity compensation and the change in accounting treatment of stock options, the Committee began moving toward granting limited amounts of time-vested restricted stock in addition to minimal numbers of stock options. Contractually obligated grants to the Chief Executive Officer have been made pursuant to his employment agreement.

Stock option grants in prior years were made in the discretion and upon recommendation of the Committee and coordinated with regularly-scheduled Board of Directors’ meetings. All option grants were made at the fair market value on the date of grant, defined as the volume-weighted average trading price of the Holding Company’s Common Stock on such grant date. All options granted to senior management vest in three to five years beginning with the first anniversary of the date of the grant and expire after ten years.

Under his employment agreement, through 2008, Mr. Reiner was entitled to receive annually Stock Incentive Compensation having an aggregate fair market value of up to $400,000, with the actual amount determined by the extent to which the target EBITA level was met for such year (“Performance-Based Stock Award”). For purposes of this Performance-Based Stock Award, fair market value was the mean between the high and low sales price of the Holding Company’s Common Stock on the date on which our audited financial statements were completed by our independent public accountants, or, if there was no such sale on that date, on the last preceding date on which such a sale was made. The payout formula, minimum performance level and each year’s target EBITA level for the Performance-Based Stock Award were the same as for Mr. Reiner’s Cash Incentive Compensation, except that his Performance-Based Stock Award could not exceed the $400,000 target amount in any fiscal year. Any stock awarded to Mr. Reiner in connection with his Performance-Based Stock Award vested immediately. Because EBITA for 2007 and 2008 was below the minimum performance level required for the Performance-Based Stock Award, Mr. Reiner did not receive any Performance-Based Stock Award for 2007 or 2008.

As noted above, through 2008, Mr. Reiner was also entitled to receive annually shares of time-vesting restricted stock having an aggregate market value nearest to $500,000 (“Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonus”). For purposes of this Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonus, fair market value was determined in the same manner as for the Performance-Based Stock Award except that the relevant measurement date was the last day of the fiscal year on which the Holding Company’s Common Stock traded. This award of restricted stock was made immediately following the close of each fiscal year. The restricted stock awarded to Mr. Reiner in connection with his Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonus for 2005 and 2006 vested in full on February 2, 2008. Because there were not enough shares available under the 2007 Plan to grant his 2007 and 2008 awards in stock, Mr. Reiner and the Holding Company agreed that he would receive his 2007 and 2008 Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonuses in cash.

401(k) Plan

The Holding Company maintains a 401(k) plan to provide retirement benefits for our personnel. Historically, this plan provided for company matching contributions of $0.25 for each $1.00 of employee contribution, up to 5% of the employee’s salary, as limited by the Code, which began to vest upon the completion of two years of employment and accrued at the rate of 20% per year. Additionally, we had the option to contribute 2% of the employee’s earnings annually, as limited by the Code, which began to vest upon the completion of three years of employment and accrued at the rate of 20% per year. Effective with the 2006 plan year, we changed the matching contribution under the 401(k) plan to $0.50 for each $1.00 of employee contribution, up to 5% of the employee’s salary, as limited by the Code, and eliminated profit-sharing contributions under the plan.

In addition, Carlyle maintains a separate employee tax savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Code, which provides for matching contributions of 25% of employee contributions, up to 5% of each participating employee’s earnings. Carlyle may make additional contributions to its plan; however, no additional contributions were made during 2007 or 2008.

Benefits and Perquisites

We generally do not provide personal benefits to our executives that are not also available generally to all salaried employees. With the exception of our Executive Medical Reimbursement Plan, our executives receive health and welfare benefits under the same programs and on the same basis as our employees in general. Our senior officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan on the same basis as our employees generally (including our contributions to the 401(k) plan), with the exception of Carlyle which maintains its own 401(k) plan. We do not maintain a defined benefit pension plan or provide post-retirement health coverage.

Our Executive Medical Reimbursement Plan reimburses executives in annual amounts up to $10,000 per year for necessary medical expenses incurred (including the cost of deductibles) which are not covered by our underlying medical benefits plans. Mr. Reiner does not participate in this plan.

We provide enhanced relocation benefits to our senior officers to assist them with the cost of company-mandated relocation and also provide to Mr. Reiner and Mr. Melvin an annual car allowance, benefits the Committee believes are consistent and competitive with benefits provided to executives in similar positions at the companies with whom we compete for executive talent and the industry in general.

Long Term Incentive Plans

The principal vehicles for awarding stock-based compensation have been the 1993, 1997 and 2007 Plans, pursuant to which we have awarded stock options, restricted and nonrestricted stock awards, and restricted stock units under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and the Director Deferred Compensation Plan discussed under “Director Compensation” below.

The 2007 Plan permits the Holding Company to grant non-incentive stock options, restricted and nonrestricted stock, restricted stock units and performance awards, including awards that qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. In connection with approval of the 2007 Plan, beginning June 19, 2007, no new awards may be made under the 1993 or 1997 Plan, and all shares that were available to be granted as awards under the 1993 and 1997 Plans became available to be granted as awards under the 2007 Plan. Shares from forfeited awards made under the 1993 or 1997 Plan or shares from awards made under the 1993 or 1997 Plan that are settled in cash or which otherwise terminate after June 19, 2007 are available to be granted as awards under the 2007 Plan.

As of January 31, 2009, an aggregate of 649,874 shares of the Holding Company’s Common Stock has been reserved for issuance pursuant to the 2007 Plan. As of January 31, 2009, no shares have been issued in connection with exercises of options granted under the 2007 Plan, 250,000 shares are reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options at an exercise price of $2.71 per share, and 207,630 shares have been issued or are subject to purchases and awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units. As of January 31, 2009, 192,244 shares of the Holding Company’s Common Stock are available for future grants under the 2007 Plan.

The 1993 Plan permitted the Holding Company to grant to key employees, directors, consultants and certain other persons the following: (i) incentive or non-incentive stock options; (ii) stock appreciation rights in tandem with stock options; (iii) limited stock appreciation rights in tandem with stock options; (iv) restricted or nonrestricted stock awards; (v) performance units based upon attainment of performance goals during a period of not less than two nor more than five years and which may be settled in cash or in the Holding Company’s Common Stock; or (vi) any combination of the foregoing. As of January 31, 2009, 511,111 shares of the Holding Company’s Common Stock have been issued in connection with exercises of options granted under the 1993 Plan, 13,000 shares are reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options, and 145,699 shares have been issued or are subject to purchases and awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units. No future grants may be made under the 1993 Plan.

The 1997 Plan permitted us to grant the same types of awards as permitted under the 1993 Plan. As of January 31, 2009, 294,494 shares of the Holding Company’s Common Stock have been issued in connection with exercises of options granted under the 1997 Plan, 395,300 shares are reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options, and 820,928 shares have been issued or are subject to purchases and awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units. No future grants may be made under the 1997 Plan.

Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan

In addition to giving the Holding Company the ability to make stock-based awards to current or future designated executives, the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan provided a vehicle for designated executives to acquire the Holding Company’s Common Stock and raise the level of stock ownership in the Holding Company by these executives, thereby strengthening the mutuality of interests between them and the Holding Company’s stockholders.

Under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, designated executives were eligible to receive RSUs through the elective deferral of 25% of their annual actual or target bonus that would otherwise be paid in cash under our Cash Bonus Plan. An RSU is a unit of measurement equivalent to one share of the Holding Company’s Common Stock, but with none of the attendant rights of a stockholder of a share of Common Stock. Two types of RSUs were awarded under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan: (i) participant RSUs received in lieu of cash bonus amounts, and (ii) matching RSUs, where the Holding Company credits the executive’s plan account with one matching RSU for each participant RSU that the participant elects to purchase. While participant RSUs are fully vested at all times, matching RSUs are subject to vesting and forfeiture as more fully described below.

The shares issued upon distribution of RSUs under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan are provided by the 2007 Plan. As a result of the unavailability of shares of the Holding Company’s Common Stock under the 2007 Plan, the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan was amended to provide that no new deferral agreements may be entered into after May 22, 2008 and that any executive deferral agreements regarding the 2008 bonus payable on April 25, 2009 were effectively cancelled; such bonus amounts were paid to the participants in cash on April 25, 2009. In addition, no additional matching awards have been or will be made under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan after May 22, 2008.

Prior to 2008, participant RSUs were credited under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan to a participant’s account on April 25th of each plan year in an amount equal to 25% of the executive’s target or actual bonus received divided by the fair market value of a share of the Holding Company’s Common Stock on the award date (with fair market value defined in the plan as the volume-weighted average trading price of a share of the Holding Company’s Common Stock for such date or, if there was no sale on that date, then on the last preceding date on which a sale was reported).

At the time of distribution under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, RSUs are converted into actual shares of Common Stock of the Holding Company. Subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, for each participant RSU, a participant will receive one share of Common Stock (and cash in lieu of fractional shares) as soon as practicable following the earlier of the participant’s termination of employment or the expiration of the deferral period elected by the participant (i.e., three, five or seven years after an award date, or as extended or terminated earlier in accordance with the plan). For each vested matching RSU, a participant will receive one share of Common Stock (and cash in lieu of fractional shares) as soon as practicable following the earlier of the participant’s termination of employment or the expiration of the deferral period elected by the participant, provided that if a participant’s employment or directorship is terminated for any reason other than due to death, “disability”, or a “change of control” or a termination of the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, each vested matching RSU in a participant’s account will be distributed 12 months after such termination.

Participant RSUs are fully vested at all times. Matching RSUs under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan vest three years after the applicable award date, provided the executive is continuously employed by us or a subsidiary from the award date through the applicable vesting date. In the event an executive’s employment is terminated for any reason (other than by us without “cause” or as a result of death, “disability,” “retirement” or a “change of control” (as each such term is defined in the plan)) prior to the applicable vesting date, all unvested matching RSUs are forfeited. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a participant’s death, “disability” or upon a “change of control,” in each case while employed by us or a subsidiary, all unvested matching RSUs will become 100% vested. Upon a termination of a participant’s employment by us or a subsidiary without “cause” or upon “retirement” (as each such term is defined in the plan), a participant’s unvested matching RSUs will be subject to pro-rata vesting, based on the number of whole years employed in a particular vesting period, and any remaining unvested matching RSUs will be forfeited.

If a participant engages in “detrimental activity” (as defined in the plan) while employed or during a period commencing on the participant’s termination date and ending one year following the date that a participant terminates employment: (i) the participant will forfeit both vested and unvested matching RSUs to the extent not yet distributed to a participant, and (ii) the Holding Company may recover from such participant, the value of any shares of Common Stock that were distributed under the plan attributable to such matching RSUs, valued at the greater of the “fair market value” on the date the participant received the distribution under the plan or the date that the participant engaged in “detrimental activity.”

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2008 Fiscal Year End

The table below sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers at the end of 2008.

	Option Awards (1)									Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (2)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Arthur E. Reiner		60,000		--		--	$	12.75	2/16/2010		13,439	(3)	$	403		--		--
		60,000		--		--		7.05	9/28/2011		44,704	(4)		1,341		--		--

Bruce E. Zurlnick		10,000		--		--		13.5625	12/20/2009		2,487	(3)		75		--		--
		5,000		--		--		12.75	2/16/2010		8,273	(4)		248		--		--
		15,000		--		--		7.05	9/28/2011
		8,333		16,667		--		2.7122	12/4/2017

Joseph M. Melvin		20,000		--		--		12.75	2/16/2010		3,627	(3)		109		--		--
		27,000		--		--		7.05	9/28/2011		12,065	(4)		362		--		--
		15,000		30,000		--		2.7122	12/4/2017


Leslie A. Philip		30,000		--		--		12.75	2/16/2010		3,785	(3)		114		--		--
		30,000		--		--		7.05	9/28/2011
		15,000		30,000		--		2.7122	12/4/2017

Joyce M. Magrini		5,000		--		--		12.75	2/16/2010		2,608	(3)		260		--		--
		10,000		--		--		7.05	9/28/2011		8,674	(4)		78		--		--
		8,333		16,667		--		2.7122	12/4/2017

Edward J. Stein (5)		--		--		--		--	--		--			--		--		--
		--		--		--		--	--		--			--		--		--

(1)

Options with expiration dates before 2017 generally vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of their grant date and become fully exercisable on the fifth anniversary of their grant date and expire on the day before the tenth anniversary of their grant date; options with expiration dates in or after 2017 generally vest in three annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of their grant date and become fully exercisable on the third anniversary of their grant date and expire on the day before the tenth anniversary of their grant date.

(2)	Reflects the number of unvested RSUs held as of January 31, 2009 multiplied by $0.03, the closing price of the Holding Company’s Common Stock on January 30, 2009, the last trading day of the 2008 fiscal year.

(3)	Reflects the number of unvested matching RSUs as of January 31, 2009 awarded in April 2006 held for the account of the named executive officer pursuant to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. These matching RSUs vest on the third anniversary of their award date.

(4)	Reflects the number of unvested matching RSUs as of January 31, 2009 awarded in April 2007 held for the account of the named executive officer pursuant to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. These matching RSUs vest on the third anniversary of their award date.

(5)	In connection with his retirement, Mr. Stein forfeited any unexercisable options and unvested RSUs on June 23, 2008. Mr. Stein’s remaining exercisable options expired on July 14, 2008.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements, the Change of Control Executive Severance Plan, the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, the 1993, 1997 and 2007 Plans and individual award agreements under those plans, our named executive officers are, or were, entitled to certain payments or benefits upon a change of control of the Holding Company or in connection with certain termination events. In connection with his planned retirement on June 23, 2008, Finlay Jewelry and Mr. Stein entered into a Severance Agreement and General Release which replaced his prior employment agreement and governs his termination compensation.

With the exception of Mr. Stein, the following discussion generally describes the payments that could have been made to our named executive officers upon various events of termination, including termination in connection with a change of control, assuming the termination event occurred on January 31, 2009. In Mr. Stein’s case, the following discussion describes the payments to which Mr. Stein is entitled pursuant to his Severance Agreement and General Release in connection with his retirement on June 23, 2008. The following discussion generally does not address payments and benefits provided on a nondiscriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment.

Chief Executive Officer

As noted above, Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement expired in accordance with its terms on January 31, 2009. Prior to its expiration, as most recently amended on April 25, 2008, his employment agreement provided that if, at the expiration of the employment term (or earlier under specified circumstances), we and Mr. Reiner could not agree upon terms to continue Mr. Reiner's employment, or if his employment were terminated without “cause” or by Mr. Reiner for “good reason” (as defined in his employment agreement), he would have been entitled to receive a severance payment of one year's base salary plus an amount equal to the greater of: (i) his Cash Incentive Compensation paid for the most recently completed fiscal year, or (ii) one year's base salary (“Severance Amount”). Mr. Reiner would also have been entitled to continued payment of premiums on his term life insurance for the remainder of the term of his agreement.

If Mr. Reiner's employment were terminated prior to a “change of control” (as defined in his employment agreement) either by us without “cause” or by Mr. Reiner for “good reason,” Mr. Reiner would have continued to receive his base salary for the balance of the term and Incentive Compensation (calculated as though 110.0% of the Target Level had been achieved) as if such termination had not occurred. Mr. Reiner would also have been entitled to receive upon termination, all of the Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonuses issuable under the terms of his employment agreement, the Severance Amount and insurance and other benefits. If such termination occurred within 90 days prior to a “change of control” then Mr. Reiner would also have received the amounts described below that would be payable upon a change of control but only to the extent such amounts exceeded the amounts described in this paragraph.

In the event Mr. Reiner's employment were terminated by us without “cause” or by Mr. Reiner for “good reason” in connection with or following a “change of control,” or by Mr. Reiner for any reason within 90 days following a change of control, Mr. Reiner would have been entitled to a lump sum payment of 299.0% of his “base amount” (as defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code), subject to certain restrictions, and all of the Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonuses and Performance-Based Stock Awards issuable under the terms of his employment agreement.

Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement defined “good reason” to include: (1) any material breach by us of certain provisions in the agreement; (2) a reduction in his base salary, Incentive Compensation opportunity or Restricted Stock Time-Based Bonus; (3) our failure to use reasonable efforts to cause him to remain a director; (4) the relocation of our principal executive offices to more than 30 miles outside of New York City; in each case only if he notified the Board of Directors in writing of the occurrence of such event and the Board of Directors failed to remedy the event within ten business days of receipt of the notice; or (5) the failure of the acquirer or successor corporation following a change of control to expressly assume our obligations under the employment agreement and extend the employment term so that the unexpired portion was not less than three years (or otherwise offer him a contract providing for a term of at least three years on terms no less favorable to him than his existing employment agreement).

Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement defined “cause” to include: (1) the executive’s failure substantially to perform his job duties (or to follow reasonable directions from the Board of Directors within ten business days after receiving written notice of such failure, in Mr. Reiner’s case); (2) the executive’s willful misconduct in connection with his employment or intentional breach of our policies; (3) the executive’s conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude; or (4) the executive’s breach of any provision of the agreement which the executive officer failed to cure within ten business days after receiving notice of the breach.

Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement defined “change of control” to include: (1) any transaction or series of transactions that resulted in any person or group (other than Mr. Reiner and his related entities) becoming the beneficial owner of more than 50.0% of the Holding Company’s voting stock and/or warrants or options to acquire such voting stock, calculated on a fully diluted basis; (2) a change in majority of the Holding Company’s Board of Directors not approved by two-thirds of the directors serving when the agreement was entered into, unless such majority of directors has been elected or nominated by Mr. Reiner and his related entities; or (3) a sale of assets constituting all or substantially all of our assets.

As noted above, the term of Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement expired in accordance with its terms on January 31, 2009. We have not entered into a replacement employment agreement with Mr. Reiner, although Mr. Reiner and the Holding Company did enter into a retention bonus agreement, providing for Mr. Reiner to receive two retention bonus payments of $500,000 each in 2009, in lieu of approximately $2,100,000 in severance benefits to which Mr. Reiner would otherwise have been entitled under the terms of his employment agreement.

Other Executive Officers

In June 2005, Finlay Jewelry entered into an employment agreement with Joseph M. Melvin, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Holding Company and President and Chief Operating Officer of Finlay Jewelry. FM&B entered into an employment agreement with Leslie A. Philip, Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising Officer of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry, and Finlay Jewelry entered into an employment agreement with Joyce Manning Magrini, Executive Vice President – Administration of Finlay Jewelry. We entered into these agreements for the purposes of retention and stability.

Each of these employment agreements had a term of three years, which expired on June 30, 2008 in accordance with the provisions of the employment agreements. Under these agreements, Mr. Melvin received a minimum annual base salary of $452,056, Ms. Philip received a minimum annual base salary of $471,690, and Ms. Magrini received a minimum base salary of $325,000. In addition to annual base salary, each of the executives was entitled to receive an annual cash bonus, as described under “Annual Cash Bonuses” above. As an additional retention tool, each employment agreement also provided that the executive would receive, in the event he or she remained employed by Finlay Jewelry or FM&B, as applicable, on June 30, 2008, a special retention bonus equal to 50% of the executive’s then-current base salary. These special retention bonuses were paid to each of Mr. Melvin, and Mmes. Philip and Magrini on June 30, 2008. These agreements also contained non-compete and non-solicitation provisions.

Under these agreements, if the executive had been terminated without “good cause” (as defined in the employment agreements), the executive would have been entitled to receive, subject to satisfaction of specified conditions, a lump sum severance payment of the greater of (i) the executive’s base salary at the then-current rate through June 30, 2008, or (ii) one year’s base salary at the then-current rate plus one year’s bonus (calculated by averaging the annual bonus to the executive over the prior three fiscal years).

Because each of their agreements had expired before January 31, 2009, Mmes. Philip and Magrini would not have been entitled to receive any termination benefits under these agreements if they had been terminated without “good cause” as of January 31, 2009. We have not entered into replacement employment agreements with Ms. Philip or Ms. Magrini. Ms. Philip is scheduled to retire on May 26, 2009.

Although Mr. Melvin’s June 2005 employment agreement also expired before January 31, 2009, on December 4, 2008, Finlay Jewelry entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Melvin that amended and revised his earlier April 18, 1997 employment agreement. As amended December 4, 2008 and in place as of January 31, 2009, Mr. Melvin’s employment agreement provides that upon termination of his employment by Finlay Jewelry without cause or if Mr. Melvin terminates his employment because he is given a lesser title, he will be entitled to receive one year of his then-current base salary payable in accordance with Finlay Jewelry’s payroll practices.

In March 2006, we entered into an employment agreement with Bruce E. Zurlnick, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry. The agreement with Mr. Zurlnick provided for his continued employment as Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, for a term which ended February 28, 2009 in accordance with the provisions of the employment agreement. Under the agreement, Mr. Zurlnick received a minimum annual base salary of $310,000. In addition, Mr. Zurlnick was entitled to receive an annual cash bonus, as described under “Annual Cash Bonuses” above. The agreement with Mr. Zurlnick also provided that, in the event he remained employed by us on February 28, 2009, he would receive a special retention bonus equal to 50% of his then-current base salary. This special retention bonus was paid to Mr. Zurlnick on February 28, 2009. Under the agreement, if Mr. Zurlnick had been terminated without “good cause” (as defined in his agreement), he would have been entitled to receive, subject to satisfaction of specified conditions, a lump sum severance payment in an amount equal to the greater of (i) his base salary at the then-current rate through February 28, 2009, or (ii) one year’s base salary at the then-current rate plus one year’s bonus (calculated by averaging his annual bonus over the prior three fiscal years). We have not entered into a replacement employment agreement with Mr. Zurlnick.

Under these employment agreements, “good cause” had the same definition as “cause” under Mr. Reiner’s employment agreement.

Change of Control Executive Severance Plan

The employment agreements for Mssrs. Melvin and Zurlnick, and Mmes. Philip and Magrini did not contain change of control provisions. However, on March 11, 2008, the Holding Company adopted a Change of Control Executive Severance Plan (the “Change of Control Severance Plan”), which applies to Mssrs. Melvin and Zurlnick, and Mmes. Philip and Magrini.

The Change of Control Severance Plan provides that in the event of a termination without “cause” or for “good reason” within 18 months following a “change of control,” the executive will receive, in addition to certain accrued amounts: (i) a lump sum cash payment in an amount equal to two times the sum of his or her base salary plus the average of his or her annual bonus paid for the three fiscal years preceding the year in which a change of control occurs; (ii) if the special retention bonus has not already been paid, a lump sum cash payment equal to the amount of the special bonus, if any, that would be payable to the executive pursuant to the executive’s employment agreement upon his or her continued employment through a specified date; (iii) continued group health plan coverage pursuant to COBRA paid in part by us or our affiliates, for eighteen months following termination, or until the earlier of the executive’s ceasing to be eligible for COBRA or becoming eligible under a subsequent employer’s health plan; and (iv) accelerated vesting of all unvested equity awards held by the executive.

The Change of Control Severance Plan defines “change of control” to include: (1) any transaction or series of transactions which result in a person or group, other than Mr. Reiner and certain persons or entities related to Mr. Reiner, becoming the beneficial owner of more than 50% of the Holding Company’s voting stock and/or warrants or options to acquire the Holding Company’s voting stock; (2) a change in the composition of the Holding Company’s Board of Directors during any twelve-month period, which is not brought about by Mr. Reiner or certain persons or entities related to Mr. Reiner, such that the individuals who constituted the Holding Company’s Board of Directors at the beginning of the twelve-month period (together with any new directors whose election or nomination was approved by a vote of a majority of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination was previously so approved) no longer constitute a majority of the directors then in office; or (3) a sale of assets constituting all or substantially all of the assets of the Holding Company or Finlay Jewelry, determined on a consolidated basis. Only one change of control may occur under the Change of Control Severance Plan.

The Change of Control Severance Plan defines “cause” to include: (1) the executive’s failure to substantially perform his or her customary duties within ten business days after written notice of such failure; (2) willful misconduct or willful malfeasance by the executive in connection with his or her employment; (3) the executive’s conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, any crime constituting a felony under federal or state law, or any crime constituting a misdemeanor under any such law involving moral turpitude; or (4) the executive’s breach of any of the provisions of his or her employment agreement if the executive fails to cure the breach within ten business days after written notice of such breach.

The Change of Control Severance Plan defines “good reason” to include: (1) any material breach by us of certain provisions of the executive’s employment agreement; (2) a reduction in the executive’s base salary or annual bonus opportunity; (3) the relocation of the executive’s office to a location more than 30 miles outside of Manhattan, New York City; or (4) the failure of the acquirer or successor corporation following a change of control to expressly assume our obligations under the executive’s employment agreement and extend the employment term so that the unexpired portion is not less than three years (or otherwise offer the executive a contract providing for a term of at least three years on terms no less favorable to the executive than his or her existing employment agreement), provided the executive does not consent in writing to the change and we have not fully corrected in all material respects within ten days following receipt of notice of the event.

Executives who accept severance payments under the Change of Control Severance Plan will be required to sign a release and will be subject to certain restrictive covenants. The Change of Control Severance Plan provides that all severance benefits will be provided in a manner intended to comply with, or be exempt from, Section 409A of the Code, including delaying certain benefits to specified employees for a period of six months following termination. Severance benefits provided under the plan will also be subject to reduction to avoid any excise tax on “parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Code.

Non-Change of Control Executive Severance Pay Plan

Because the employment agreements for Mmes. Philip and Magrini had expired as of January 31, 2009, they both would have been eligible to receive severance benefits under the Severance Plan in the event they had been involuntarily terminated in connection with a layoff or reduction in force and were not offered comparable employment with one of Finlay Jewelry’s affiliates or subsidiaries. Because they had effective employment agreements as of January 31, 2009 that provided for different severance benefits, Messrs. Reiner, Zurlnick and Melvin were not eligible to receive severance benefits under the Severance Plan as of January 31, 2009.

The Severance Plan is a retention tool to encourage executives of Finlay Jewelry and Finlay Merchandising & Buying, Inc. to remain focused on the business, by providing temporary and short-term benefits to eligible “executive” employees whose employment with Finlay Jewelry or FM&B is involuntarily terminated in connection with a layoff or reduction in force and who are not offered comparable employment with one of Finlay’s affiliates or subsidiaries. The Severance Plan does not provide for severance benefits in the event an executive resigns, quits or retires, or is covered by an employment agreement that provides for severance.

Under the Severance Plan, benefits for an involuntarily terminated executive would equal a multiple of the executive's monthly base salary at his or her then current rate as of his or her date of termination, as described below, reduced by any compensation paid to the executive in lieu of any notice period required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act or applicable laws.

Years of Service		Benefit (monthly base salary)

Less than 3		2 months

3 – 6		1 month for each year of service

More than 6 but less than 20		6 months

At least 20 but less than 25		7 months

At least 25 but less than 30		9 months

30 or more		12 months

Any Mitigated Benefits would be reduced by an amount equal to the gross amounts received or earned by the executive from employment or engagement in any other business or activity during the period for which the Mitigated Benefits are payable ("Other Income"). As a condition to receipt of payment of the Mitigated Benefits, the executive shall, no later than seven days prior to the date such payment is due, certify in writing all amounts of Other Income earned by the executive during the preceding payroll period so that the appropriate offsets can be made.

Executives who accept severance payments under the Severance Plan will be required to sign a release and will be subject to certain restrictive covenants. The Severance Plan provides that all severance benefits will be provided in a manner intended to comply with, or be exempt from, Section 409A of the Code. As of January 31, 2009, Mmes. Philip and Magrini were credited with 13 and 14 years of service, respectively, under the Severance Plan.

The Severance Plan was further amended and restated effective March 19, 2009 to provide severance benefits as follows. Except as noted below, the Severance Plan operates as described above. Under the plan as amended and restated March 19, 2009, benefits for an involuntarily terminated executive will equal a multiple of the executive's weekly base salary at his or her then current rate as of his or her date of termination, as described below, reduced by any compensation paid to the executive in lieu of any notice period required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act or applicable laws.

Service (1)		Benefit

Ÿ Less than two (2) years		Four (4) weeks

Ÿ Two (2) years but less than five (5) years		Six (6) weeks

Ÿ Five (5) years but less than ten (10) years		Eight (8) weeks

Ÿ Ten (10) years but less than fifteen (15) years		Twelve (12) weeks

Ÿ Fifteen (15) years but less than twenty (20) years		Sixteen (16) weeks

Ÿ Twenty (20) years but less than twenty-five (25) years		Eighteen (18) weeks

Ÿ Twenty-five (25) years but less than thirty (30) years		Twenty (20) weeks

Ÿ Thirty (30) years or more		Twenty-six (26) weeks

(1) "Service" means an executive's completed full years of employment as of the last anniversary of the last date of hire of the executive.

Any benefit under the amended plan in excess of eight weeks to an executive whose annual base salary was $75,000 or greater on his or her date of termination (the "Mitigated Benefits") will be reduced by any Other Income.

Currently, Mr. Zurlnick and Mmes. Philip and Magrini are eligible to receive severance benefits under the Severance Plan as amended and restated March 19, 2009.

Senior Vice President and Director of Stores

In connection with his planned retirement on June 23, 2008, Finlay Jewelry and Edward J. Stein, Senior Vice President and Director of Stores of Finlay Jewelry, entered into a Severance Agreement and General Release which replaced his prior employment agreement and governs his termination compensation.

Under the agreement, upon Mr. Stein’s retirement, Mr. Stein received the accrued benefits otherwise due him under our benefit plans, COBRA rights under our health insurance plans, the right to exercise vested options within 21 days of the retirement date and receive his vested RSUs under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Stein agreed, among other things, to release us from all claims, to not disclose confidential or proprietary information obtained during his employment, and to not solicit our customers and certain of our employees for a period of one year after the retirement date for which Mr. Stein will receive a severance payment in the amount of $595,420 (plus interest), payable as follows: (1) on December 24, 2008, a lump sum of $297,710.00 (plus accrued interest from June 24, 2008 through December 23, 2008), and (2) commencing January 25, 2009, six monthly payments of $49,618.33 each. Mr. Stein also received a payment of $50,000 on December 24, 2008, in lieu of any relocation allowance to which Mr. Stein may otherwise have been entitled under our relocation policy for executives. In addition, Mr. Stein is entitled to pay health insurance premiums at our employee rate for the first eleven months following the retirement date.

Equity Awards

In addition to the payments or benefits described above, and to the extent not already vested pursuant to the agreements described above, in the case of termination of employment due to death or disability or in the case of a change of control, all unvested equity awards granted under the 1993, 1997 and 2007 Plans (including RSUs awarded under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan) will become fully vested. In the case of retirement or termination of employment by us without cause or good cause, a prorated portion of the unvested matching RSUs awarded under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan will become fully vested.

The 1993 and 1997 Plans, the award agreements under the 2007 Plan and the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan define “change of control” to include: (1) approval by the Holding Company’s stockholders of (a) any consolidation or merger of the Holding Company in which the Holding Company is not the surviving corporation or pursuant to which shares of the Holding Company’s Common Stock would be converted into cash, securities or other property, other than a merger of the Holding Company in which the holders of the Holding Company’s Common Stock immediately prior to the merger have the same proportionate ownership of common stock of the surviving corporation immediately after the merger, (b) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer of all or substantially all of our assets, or (c) the adoption of any plan of liquidation or dissolution of the Holding Company; (2) the beneficial ownership by any person or group (or the acquisition by any person or group, without the prior consent of the Holding Company’s Board of Directors, in the case of the 1993 and 1997 Plans) of 15.0% or more (30.0% or more in the case of the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and award agreements under the 2007 Plan) of the Holding Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock; or (3) a change in majority of the Holding Company’s Board of Directors not approved by a majority of the directors serving when the plan was adopted.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2009

The table below provides compensation information for the year ended January 31, 2009 for each non-employee member of the Holding Company’s Board of Directors.

Name (1)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (3)		Stock Awards ($) (4)(5)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
David B. Cornstein	$	36,999	$	20,318		--		--		--		--	$	57,317
Rohit M. Desai		40,500		20,314		--		--		--		--		60,814
Louis Lipschitz		51,000		25,190		--		--		--		--		76,190
Norman S. Matthews (6)		70,500		10,500		--		--		--		--		81,000
Thomas M. Murnane		46,500		22,747		--		--		--		--		69,247
Ellen R. Levine (2)		29,333		9,378		--		--		--		--		38,711
Charles E. McCarthy (2)		33,333		9,376		--		--		--		--		42,709

(1)

Mr. Arthur E. Reiner, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Holding Company and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Finlay Jewelry, is not included in this table as he is an employee and thus receives no compensation for his service as a director on the Holding Company’s Board. The compensation received by Mr. Reiner as an employee is shown in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

Ms. Levine and Mr. McCarthy resigned from the Holding Company’s Board of Directors on December 8, 2008.

(3)

During 2008, the directors deferred the following fees into the Director Deferred Compensation Plan: Mr. Cornstein: $12,500; Mr. Desai: $12,500; Mr. Lipschitz: $15,500; Mr. Murnane: $14,000; and Mr. McCarthy: $12,500. In each case the grant date fair value of the matching RSUs awarded to each director equaled the amount of the fees the director deferred. Mr. Matthews and Ms. Levine did not defer any fees into the Director Deferred Compensation Plan during 2008.

(4)

The amounts in this column reflect the compensation expense of matching RSUs granted under the 1993, 1997 and/or 2007 Plans for financial reporting purposes for 2008, and may include amounts from awards granted in and prior to 2008. These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these awards, and do not reflect compensation actually received by the director. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the assumptions made in determining SFAS No. 123(R) “Stock-Based Compensation” values.

(5)

As of January 31, 2009, each non-employee director held the following RSUs: Mr. Cornstein: 22,966 vested and 15,698 unvested; Mr. Desai: 36,170 vested and 15,698 unvested; Mr. Lipschitz: 30,074 vested and 19,466 unvested; Mr. Matthews: 25,928 vested and 0 unvested; and Mr. Murnane: 33,848 vested and 17,582 unvested.

(6)

Mr. Matthews receives an additional $25,000 per year as Independent Lead Director of the Holding Company’s Board of Directors.

In accordance with its charter, the Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors, compensation arrangements for non-employee directors. With the exception of Mr. Cornstein, the current compensation arrangement as described below for our independent directors, has been in effect since May 2003.

Directors who are also employees receive no additional compensation for serving as members of the Board.

For serving as a director of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry during 2008, each non-employee director received aggregate compensation at the rate of $25,000 per year plus $1,000 for each meeting of the Board and each committee meeting attended in person, and $500 for each meeting attended by conference telephone call, with the Chairman of the Audit Committee receiving an additional annual fee of $6,000 and the Chairman for the Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees receiving an additional annual fee of $3,000 each. Mr. Matthews, as Lead Independent Director, receives an additional annual fee of $25,000.

Non-employee directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry will receive compensation for board service under the same arrangements for 2009.

From August 2003 until May 22, 2008, each non-employee director has been allowed to elect, under the Holding Company’s Director Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (the ‘‘Director Deferred Compensation Plan’’), to defer 100% of his or her eligible director fees (which are annual retainer fees plus any annual fees received by a participant for services as chairperson of any committee of the Board of Directors, other than the Lead Independent Director’s annual fee) that would otherwise be paid in cash, and receive RSUs. The Director Deferred Compensation Plan operates in substantially the same manner as the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan described above, except that the directors could defer fees on a quarterly rather than annual basis and the matching RSUs vest in one year. The participant RSUs were awarded and credited to a director participant’s account quarterly in an amount based on a formula which divided the cash amount deferred by the fair market value of a share of the Holding Company’s Common Stock on the award date. On each award date, the Holding Company credited a participant’s account with one matching RSU for each participant RSU purchased by the director.

The shares issued upon distribution of RSUs under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan are provided by the 2007 Plan. As a result of the unavailability of shares of the Holding Company’s Common Stock under the 2007 Plan, the Director Deferred Compensation Plan was amended to provide that no new deferral agreements may be entered into after May 22, 2008 and that cash, rather than RSUs, would be paid for eligible directors’ fees deferred with respect to the third and fourth quarters of 2008. In addition, no additional matching awards have been or will be made under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan after May 22, 2008.

The following non-employee directors currently own RSUs in the amounts set forth below:

	Participant RSUs	Matching RSUs
	Vested	Vested	Unvested
David B. Cornstein	19,332	19,332	-
Rohit M. Desai	25,258	25,258	-
Louis Lipschitz	24,770	24,770	-
Norman S. Matthews	12,964	12,964	-
Thomas M. Murnane	24,958	24,958	-

The number of RSUs owned by each such director includes the following amounts of RSUs acquired during 2008: Mr. Cornstein: 15,698 participant RSUs and 15,698 matching RSUs; Mr. Desai: 15,698 participant RSUs and 15,698 matching RSUs; Mr. Lipschitz: 19,466 participant RSUs and 19,466 matching RSUs; and Mr. Murnane: 17,582 participant RSUs and 17,582 matching RSUs.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to beneficial ownership of the Common Stock of the Holding Company as of April 25, 2009 by (i) each person who, to the knowledge of the Holding Company, was the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Holding Company, (ii) each of the Holding Company’s directors and named executive officers, and (iii) all current directors and executive officers as a group. The Holding Company owns all of our issued and outstanding capital stock.

	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Name and Address	Number of Shares		Percentage of Class
David W. Rose (1)		900,100		9.5	%
David B. Cornstein (2)(3)		446,114		4.7	%
Arthur E. Reiner (2)(4)		428,521		4.5	%
Joseph M. Melvin (2)(5)		108,569		1.1	%
Leslie A. Philip (2)(6)		106,945		1.1	%
Norman S. Matthews (2) (7)		77,548		*
Thomas M. Murnane (2) (8)		75,896		*
Bruce E. Zurlnick (2)(9)		73,554		*
Rohit M. Desai (2)(10)		61,550		*
Louis Lipschitz (2) (11)		49,540		*
Joyce Manning Magrini (2) (12)		35,498		*
Edward J. Stein (2)(13)		34,402		*
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons) (2) (14)		1,463,735		14.5	%

*Less than one percent.

(1)

Based on 9,436,105 shares outstanding on April 25, 2009. Information concerning the common stock beneficially owned as of December 17, 2008, was obtained from a Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on December 19, 2008. According to the Schedule 13D, Mr. David W. Rose has sole power to vote and sole power to dispose of these 900,100 shares of common stock. The address for Mr. Rose is 310 East 70th Street, New York, New York 10021.

(2)

Based on 9,436,105 shares outstanding on April 25, 2009. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within 60 days from April 25, 2009 upon the exercise of options and vesting of matching RSUs. Each beneficial owner’s percentage ownership is determined by assuming that options and matching RSUs that are held by such person and which are exercisable or become vested within 60 days of April 25, 2009 have been exercised or have become vested. Except as noted below, each beneficial owner has sole voting power and sole investment power. The address for the beneficial owners named in the table, unless specified otherwise in a subsequent footnote, is c/o the Holding Company, 529 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10017.

(3)	Includes 38,664 participant and vested matching RSUs.

(4)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 120,000 shares of Common Stock having exercise prices ranging from $7.05 to $12.75 per share. Also includes 44,704 participant RSUs and excludes 44,704 matching RSUs which are not yet vested.

(5)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 62,000 shares of Common Stock having exercise prices ranging from $2.71 to $12.75 per share. Also includes 12,065 participant RSUs and excludes 12,065 matching RSUs which are not yet vested.

(6)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 75,000 shares of Common Stock having exercise prices ranging from $2.71 to $12.75 per share.

(7)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 20,000 shares of Common Stock having exercise prices ranging from $9.85 to $12.75 per share. Also includes 25,928 participant and vested matching RSUs.

(8)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 5,000 shares of Common Stock having an exercise price of $12.939 per share. Also includes 49,916 participant and vested matching RSUs.

(9)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 38,333 shares of Common Stock having exercise prices ranging from $2.71 to $13.5625 per share. Also includes 13,107 participant and vested matching RSUs and excludes 8,273 matching RSUs which are not yet vested.

(10)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 5,000 shares of Common Stock having an exercise price of $15.877 per share. Also includes 50,516 participant and vested matching RSUs.

(11)	Includes 49,540 participant and vested matching RSUs.

(12)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 23,333 shares of Common Stock having exercise prices ranging from $2.71 to $12.75 per share. Also includes 8,674 participant RSUs and excludes 8,674 matching RSUs which are not yet vested.

(13)	Mr. Stein retired June 23, 2008.

(14)	Includes options to acquire an aggregate of 348,666 shares of Common Stock having exercise prices ranging from $2.71 to $13.5625 per share. Also includes an aggregate of 293,114 participant and vested matching RSUs and excludes an aggregate of 73,716 matching RSUs which are not yet vested.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Options to purchase the Holding Company’s Common Stock, restricted stock and RSUs have been granted by the Holding Company to employees and non-employee directors under various equity compensation plans. The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding stock options and RSUs and the number of securities remaining to be issued under all outstanding equity compensation plans as of January 31, 2009.

Plan Category	(a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights			(b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights			(c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)		1,198,602	(2)	$	7.46	(3)		192,244	(4)
Equity compensation plans not approved
by security holders		-			-			-
Total		1,198,602		$	7.46			192,244

(1)	Reflects information relating to the 1993, 1997 and 2007 Plans.

(2)	Reflects outstanding stock options and RSUs as of January 31, 2009, issued under the 1993, 1997 and 2007 Plans, and shares of restricted stock to be issued under the 2007 plan.

(3)	RSUs are settled for shares of the Holding Company’s Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. Accordingly, RSUs have been excluded for purposes of computing the weighted-average exercise price in column (b).

(4)

Awards are permitted under the 2007 Plan in the form of non-incentive stock options, restricted and nonrestricted stock, RSUs, including awards under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and Director Deferred Compensation Plan and performance awards, including awards that qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, subject to such terms and conditions as the Holding Company’s Compensation Committee shall determine. In connection with the adoption of the 2007 Plan, no further awards may be granted under the 1993 or 1997 Plan.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain Other Transactions

Finlay has entered into indemnification agreements which require, among other things, that Finlay indemnify directors and officers who are parties to such agreements against certain liabilities and associated expenses arising from their service as directors and officers of Finlay and reimburse certain related legal and other expenses. In the event of a Change of Control (as defined in such agreements), Finlay will, upon request by an indemnitee under his or her agreements, create and fund a trust for the benefit of such indemnitee sufficient to satisfy reasonably anticipated claims for indemnification. Finlay also covers all directors and officers under a directors and officers liability policy maintained by Finlay in such amounts as the Board of Directors of the Holding Company finds reasonable. Although the indemnification agreements offer coverage similar to the provisions in the Holding Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the Delaware General Corporation Law, they provide greater assurance to directors and officers that indemnification will be available because, as contracts, they cannot be modified unilaterally in the future by the Board of Directors or by the stockholders to eliminate the rights they provide.

We have operated under our Codes of Ethics for many years. As part of our Codes of Ethics, directors and employees are expected to make business decisions and take actions based upon the best interests of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry and not based upon personal relationships or benefits. The Codes of Ethics reflect our commitment to requiring the highest standards of professional and ethical conduct from our employees and directors and to fostering a culture of honesty, integrity and accountability. The Codes of Ethics outline the basic principles and policies with which all employees and directors are expected to comply. Activities that could give rise to conflicts of interest are prohibited unless specifically approved in advance by the Audit Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry.

The Audit Committees of the Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry are responsible for reviewing, approving and ratifying related party transactions pursuant to the companies’ related party transactions policy. We may enter into a related party transaction only if the Audit Committees approve or ratify such transaction and if the Audit Committees determine the transaction to be beneficial to the companies and on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party.

Gorporate Governance, Board of Directors and Committees of the Board

The following current directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry have been determined by the Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry to be independent under the Nasdaq listing standards: David B. Cornstein, Rohit M. Desai, Louis Lipschitz, Norman S. Matthews and Thomas M. Murnane. Until their resignations effective December 8, 2008, former directors Ellen R. Levine and Charles E. McCarthy had also been determined by the Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry to be independent under the Nasdaq listing standards.

The Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry have standing Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees that meet in joint sessions. No director who serves on these committees is an officer or employee of the Holding Company or any of its subsidiaries.

The current members of the Audit Committees of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry are Mr. Lipschitz, its Chairman, and Messrs. Desai and Murnane, none of whom are employees of the Holding Company or Finlay Jewelry, and each of whom is independent under the Nasdaq listing standards applicable to audit committee members.

The current members of the Compensation Committees of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry are Mr. Matthews, its Chairman, and Mr. Lipschitz, each of whom is independent under the Nasdaq listing standards applicable to compensation committee members. Until December 8, 2008, the members of the Compensation Committees of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry were Mr. Matthews, its Chairman, and former directors Ms. Levine and Mr. McCarthy, each of whom was independent under the Nasdaq listing standards applicable to compensation committee members.

The current members of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees of the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry are Mr. Murnane, its Chairman, and Messrs. Cornstein, Desai and Matthews, each of whom is independent under the Nasdaq listing standards applicable to nominating committee members.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Eisner LLP audited our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008.

Audit Fees. Audit fees totaling $750,000 were billed by Eisner LLP for professional services in connection with our annual audit and quarterly reviews of our financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2009. Audit fees totaling $870,000 were billed by Eisner LLP for professional services in connection with our annual audit and quarterly reviews of our financial statements as well as the audit of our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended February 2, 2008.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees billed by Eisner LLP for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, and which are not included in the above caption “Audit Fees”, were $31,000 for the year ended January 31, 2009 and $28,000 for the year ended February 2, 2008. In 2008 and 2007, audit-related services were performed by Eisner LLP in connection with their audit of our 401(k) plan.

Tax Fees. No fees were billed by Eisner LLP for professional services rendered for tax compliance and tax advice for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 or February 2, 2008.

All Other Fees. No other fees were billed by Eisner LLP in the fiscal years ended January 31, 2009 or February 2, 2008.

The Audit Committees have established pre-approval policies and procedures pursuant to which the Audit Committees approved the foregoing audit, audit-related and permissible non-audit services provided in 2008 and 2007. The Audit Committees, or a designated member of the Audit Committees, must pre-approve all audit (including audit-related) and permitted non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. The Audit Committees have delegated interim pre-approval authority to Louis Lipschitz, Audit Committee Chairman. Any interim pre-approval of permitted non-audit services is required to be reported to the Audit Committees at their next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committees do not delegate to management their responsibility to pre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements.

See Financial Statements Index included in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules.

None.

(3) Exhibits.

(Exhibit Number referenced to Item 601 of Regulation S-K).

Item Number	Description

1.1	Purchase Agreement dated as of May 27, 2004 among Finlay Jewelry, the Holding Company, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and SG Americas Securities, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2004 filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 10, 2004).

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 19, 2005 by and among Finlay Jewelry, FFJ Acquisition Corp., Carlyle & Co. Jewelers, certain stockholders of Carlyle & Co. Jewelers and Russell L. Cohen (as stockholders’ agent) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 25, 2005).

2.2(a)

Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 27, 2007 by and among Zale Corporation, Zale Delaware, Inc., TXDC, L.P., Finlay Jewelry and, for limited purposes, the Holding Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2(a) filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2007 filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 13, 2007).

2.2(b)

Letter Agreement dated November 9, 2007 amending the Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 27, 2007 by and among Zale Corporation, Zale Delaware, Inc., TXDC, L.P., Finlay Jewelry and, for limited purposes, the Holding Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2(b) filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2007 filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 13, 2007).

3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of Finlay Jewelry, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed as part of the Form S-1 Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-59580 filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 11, 1993).

3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of Finlay Jewelry dated as of December 4, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 10, 2007).

3.2(a)

Amendment to the Amended and Restated By-Laws of Finlay Jewelry dated as of December 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2(a) filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 9, 2008).

4.1	Article Fourth of the Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and Articles II and VI of the Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2, 2008 filed by Finlay Jewelry on April 17, 2008).

4.4(a)

Indenture dated as of June 3, 2004 between Finlay Jewelry and HSBC Bank USA, as Trustee, relating to Finlay Jewelry’s 8-3/8% Senior Notes due June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2004 filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 10, 2004).

4.4(b)

Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 19, 2005 among Carlyle & Co. Jewelers, Finlay Jewelry and HSBC Bank USA, as Trustee, together with Subsidiary Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 25, 2005).

4.4(c)

Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 19, 2005 among J.E. Caldwell Co., Finlay Jewelry and HSBC Bank USA, as Trustee, together with Subsidiary Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 25, 2005).

4.4(d)

Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 19, 2005 among Carlyle & Co. of Montgomery, Finlay Jewelry and HSBC Bank USA, as Trustee, together with Subsidiary Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 25, 2005).

4.4(e)

Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 19, 2005 among Park Promenade, Inc., Finlay Jewelry and HSBC Bank USA, as Trustee, together with Subsidiary Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 25, 2005).

4.4(f)

Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 26, 2008 between Finlay Jewelry and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee, relating to Finlay Jewelry’s 8-3/8% Senior Notes due June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 3, 2008).

4.5	Form of Finlay Jewelry’s 8-3/8% Senior Notes due June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 filed as part of the Form S-4 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-117288 filed by Finlay Jewelry on July 12, 2004).

4.6

Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 3, 2004 between Finlay Jewelry and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and SG Americas Securities, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2004 filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 10, 2004).

4.7

Indenture dated as of November 26, 2008 between Finlay Jewelry and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee, relating to Finlay Jewelry’s 11.375%/12.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 3, 2008).

4.8

Indenture dated as of November 26, 2008 between Finlay Jewelry and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee, relating to Finlay Jewelry’s 8.375%/8.945% Senior Secured Third Lien Notes due June 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 3, 2008).

4.9

Intercreditor Agreement dated as of November 26, 2008 between General Electric Capital Corporation, as first lien agent, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as second lien agent and as third lien agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 3, 2008).

10.1*

Executive Medical Benefits Plan of Finlay Jewelry and the Holding Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed as part of the Form S-1 Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-59380 filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 11, 1993).

10.2(a)*

Employment Agreement dated as of January 30, 2005 among the Holding Company, Finlay Jewelry and Arthur E. Reiner (including the forms of restricted stock agreements annexed thereto) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2004 filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 9, 2004).

10.2(a)(i)*

Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated as of March 11, 2008 among the Holding Company, Finlay Jewelry and Arthur E. Reiner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 14, 2008).

10.2(a)(ii)*

Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement dated as of April 25, 2008 among the Holding Company, Finlay Jewelry and Arthur E. Reiner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a)(ii) filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on April 28, 2008).

10.2(a)(iii)*

Retention Bonus Agreement dated as of March 11, 2009 among the Holding Company, Finlay Jewelry and Arthur E. Reiner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 12, 2009).

10.2(b)*

Employment Agreement dated as of June 16, 2005 between Joseph M. Melvin and Finlay Jewelry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 22, 2005).

10.2(b)(i)*

Employment Agreement dated as of April 18, 1997 between Joseph M. Melvin and Finlay Jewelry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 1998 filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 24, 1998).

10.2(b)(ii)*

Letter Agreement dated as of December 4, 2008 amending Employment Agreement between Joseph M. Melvin and Finlay Jewelry dated as of April 18, 1997.

10.2(c)*

Employment Agreement dated as of June 16, 2005 between Leslie A. Philip and Finlay Merchandising & Buying, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 22, 2005).

10.2(d)*

Employment Agreement dated as of June 16, 2005 between Joyce Manning Magrini and Finlay Jewelry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 22, 2005).

10.2(e)*

Employment Agreement dated as of February 28, 2006 between Bruce E. Zurlnick and Finlay Jewelry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 8, 2006).

10.2(e)(i)*

Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated as of November 7, 2008 between Bruce E. Zurlnick and Finlay Jewelry.

10.3	Tax Allocation Agreement dated as of November 1, 1992 between the Holding Company and Finlay Jewelry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19.5 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 1993 filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 30, 1993).

10.4(a)*

Long Term Incentive Plan of the Holding Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19.5 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 1993 filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 30, 1993).

10.4(b)*

Amendment No. 1 to the Holding Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14(b) filed as part of the Form S-1 Registration Statement, Registration No. 33-88938 filed by the Holding Company on January 31, 1995).

10.4(c)*

Amendment to the Holding Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan, effective September 28, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11(c) filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2, 2002 filed by Finlay Jewelry on April 29, 2002).

10.5(a)*

1997 Long Term Incentive Plan of the Holding Company, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2, 2002 filed by Finlay Jewelry on April 29, 2002).

10.5(b)*

Amendment to the Holding Company’s 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan, effective July 30, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on September 10, 2004).

10.5(c)*

Amendment to the Holding Company’s 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan, effective May 8, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 26, 2006).

10.5(d)*

Amendment to the Holding Company’s 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan, effective February 27, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(d) filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 2007 filed by Finlay Jewelry on April 19, 2007).

10.6(a)*

The Holding Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on September 16, 2003).

10.6(b)*

Amendment No. 1 dated June 19, 2003 to the Holding Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on September 16, 2003).

10.6(c)*

Form of Deferral Agreement under the Holding Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 10, 2003).

10.6(d)*

Amendment dated February 27, 2007 to the Holding Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6(d) filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 2007 filed by Finlay Jewelry on April 19, 2007).

10.6(e)*

Amendment No. 4 to the Holding Company’s Executive Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan, effective May 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 9, 2008).

10.7(a)*

The Holding Company’s Director Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on September 16, 2003).

10.7(b)*

Form of Deferral Agreement under the Holding Company’s Director Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 10, 2003).

10.7(c)*

Amendment No. 1 to the Holding Company’s Director Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan, effective May 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 9, 2008).

10.8(g)

Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2007 among Finlay Jewelry, Carlyle & Co. Jewelers LLC, L. Congress, Inc., the Holding Company, General Electric Capital Corporation, individually and in its capacity as administrative agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A., individually and in its capacity as documentation agent, and certain other lenders and financial institutions parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8(a) filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2007 filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 13, 2007).

10.8(h)

Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 18, 2008 to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, among Finlay Jewelry, Carlyle & Co. Jewelers LLC, and L. Congress, Inc., as borrowers, the Holding Company, Finlay Jewelry, Inc., Finlay Merchandising & Buying LLC, eFinlay, Inc. and Park Promenade LLC, as credit parties, General Electric Capital Corporation, as agent for the lenders, and the lenders parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 3, 2008).

10.8(i)

Limited Consent and Amendment No. 2 dated as of February 25, 2009 to Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, among Finlay Jewelry, Carlyle & Co. Jewelers LLC, and L. Congress, Inc., as borrowers, the Holding Company, Finlay Jewelry, Inc., Finlay Merchandising & Buying LLC, eFinlay, Inc. and Park Promenade LLC, as credit parties, General Electric Capital Corporation, as agent for the lenders, and the lenders parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 3, 2009).

10.9

Amended and Restated Guaranty dated as of January 22, 2003 by Finlay Jewelry, Inc. (“FJI”), Finlay Merchandising & Buying, Inc. (“Finlay Merchandising & Buying”) and eFinlay, Inc. (“eFinlay”) in favor of General Electric Capital Corporation (“G.E. Capital”), individually and as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 1, 2003).

10.10(a)

Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated as of January 22, 2003 by and among Finlay Jewelry, FJI, Finlay Merchandising & Buying, eFinlay and G.E. Capital, individually and as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 1, 2003).

10.10(b)

Amendment to Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated as of May 19, 2005 by and among Finlay Jewelry, FJI, Finlay Merchandising & Buying, eFinlay, Carlyle & Co. Jewelers, Carlyle and Co. of Montgomery, Park Promenade, Inc. and J.E. Caldwell Co., and G.E. Capital, individually and as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 25, 2005).

10.11

Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement dated as of January 22, 2003 by and among Finlay Jewelry, FJI, Finlay Merchandising & Buying, eFinlay and G.E. Capital, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 1, 2003).

10.12

Amended and Restated Trademark Security Agreement dated as of January 22, 2003 by Finlay Jewelry, FJI, Finlay Merchandising & Buying and eFinlay in favor of G.E. Capital, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 1, 2003).

10.13

Amended and Restated Patent Security Agreement dated as of January 22, 2003 by Finlay Jewelry, FJI, Finlay Merchandising & Buying and eFinlay in favor of G.E. Capital, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 1, 2003).

10.14

Amended and Restated Copyright Security Agreement dated as of January 22, 2003 by Finlay Jewelry, FJI, Finlay Merchandising & Buying and eFinlay in favor of G.E. Capital, as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 1, 2003).

10.15

Second Amended and Restated Open-End Mortgage Deed and Security Agreement from Finlay Jewelry to G.E. Capital dated February 20, 2003, effective as of January 22, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 1, 2003 filed by Finlay Jewelry on May 1, 2003).

10.16

Form of Officer’s and Director’s Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 29, 1995 filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 3, 1995).

10.21*

Description of Director and Named Executive Officer Compensation.

10.22*

Finlay Executive Severance Pay Plan, amended and restated effective March 19, 2009.

10.23*

The Holding Company’s 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 25, 2007).

10.23(a)*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Holding Company’s 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(a) filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 25, 2007).

10.23(b)*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Holding Company’s 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(b) filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 25, 2007).

10.23(c)*

Form of Agreement and Certificate of Option pursuant to the Holding Company’s 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(c) filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 25, 2007).

10.23(d)*

Form of Agreement and Certificate of Option pursuant to the Holding Company’s 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23(d) filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 25, 2007).

10.24*

The Holding Company’s Cash Bonus Plan, effective as of June 19, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 25, 2007).

10.25*

Severance Agreement and General Release between Finlay Jewelry and Edward J. Stein dated March 27, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 31, 2008).

10.26*

Finlay Jewelry Change of Control Executive Severance Plan, effective March 11, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on March 14, 2008).

10.27*

Letter agreement between the Holding Company and Arthur E. Reiner dated as of June 5, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on June 9, 2008).

10.28

Exchange and Purchase Agreement dated as of November 26, 2008 by and among Finlay Jewelry and certain beneficial holders of Finlay Jewelry’s 8-3/8% Senior Notes due June 1, 2012 parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 3, 2008).

10.29

Second Lien Security Agreement dated as of November 26, 2008 among Finlay Jewelry, Finlay Jewelry, Inc., Finlay Merchandising & Buying LLC, eFinlay, Inc., Carlyle & Co. Jewelers LLC, Park Promenade, LLC, L. Congress, Inc. and the Holding Company, as grantors, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 3, 2008).

10.30

Third Lien Security Agreement dated as of November 26, 2008 among Finlay Jewelry, Finlay Jewelry, Inc., Finlay Merchandising & Buying LLC, eFinlay, Inc., Carlyle & Co. Jewelers LLC, Park Promenade, LLC, L. Congress, Inc. and the Holding Company, as grantors, and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Finlay Jewelry on December 3, 2008).

18.1	Preferability letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding change in inventory valuation methodology (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18 filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2004 filed Finlay Jewelry on December 9, 2004).

21.1	Subsidiaries of Finlay Jewelry.

31.1	Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302.

31.2	Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302.

32.1	Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906.

32.2	Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906.

*	Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(b)	Exhibits – See exhibit index included in Item 15(a)(3) of Part IV of this Form 10-K.

(c)	Financial Statement Schedules – None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation.

Date: May 12, 2009	By:	/s/ ARTHUR E. REINER
		Arthur E. Reiner Chairman of the Board

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Name	Title	Date

/s/ ARTHUR E. REINER	Chairman of the Board, Chief	May 12, 2009
Arthur E. Reiner	Executive Officer and Director
	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ BRUCE E. ZURLNICK	Senior Vice President, Treasurer and	May 12, 2009
Bruce E. Zurlnick	Chief Financial Officer (Principal
	Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ DAVID B. CORNSTEIN	Director	May 12, 2009
David B. Cornstein

/s/ ROHIT M. DESAI	Director	May 12, 2009
Rohit M. Desai

/s/ LOUIS LIPSCHITZ	Director	May 12, 2009
Louis Lipschitz

/s/ NORMAN S. MATTHEWS	Director	May 12, 2009
Norman S. Matthews

/s/ THOMAS M. MURNANE	Director	May 12, 2009
Thomas M. Murnane

FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PAGE

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended January 31, 2009
and February 2, 2008	F-4

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity (Deficiency) and Comprehensive Loss
for the years ended January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008	F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended January 31, 2009
and February 2, 2008	F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended January 31, 2009
and February 2, 2008	F-8

F-1

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 31, 2009.

This Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting pursuant to temporary rules of the Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Form 10-K.

/s/ ARTHUR E. REINER

Arthur E. Reiner

Chief Executive Officer

/s/ BRUCE E. ZURLNICK

Bruce E. Zurlnick

Senior Vice President, Treasurer

and Chief Financial Officer

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholder and Board of Directors

Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholder’s equity (deficiency) and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2009. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Finlay Fine Jewelry Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1, the Company has incurred a significant operating loss in 2008, and as a result of current economic conditions has implemented a strategic plan to significantly reduce the size of its business. Further, as described in Note 1, the Company’s line of credit has been reduced and the net proceeds from the liquidation of inventory are to be used to repay the outstanding balance under the line by its maturity date in February 2010. In connection therewith, the Company was required to achieve certain weekly targeted percentages of sales and cash receipts and cash disbursements as set forth in their operating plan which have not been met. As a result thereof, the lender is no longer obligated to permit the Company to borrow under the line and may accelerate payment of the outstanding balance. Further, the Company presently does not have a credit facility to replace its existing credit line. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Eisner LLP

New York, New York

April 30, 2009

F-3

FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands)

	Year Ended
	January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008

Sales	$	754,305		$	717,352
Cost of sales (including an inventory write-down of
$24.3 million in 2008)		460,134			393,293
Gross margin		294,171			324,059
Selling, general and administrative expenses		348,992			301,447
Impairment charges		34,633			3,009
Depreciation and amortization		17,511			14,456
Income (loss) from operations		(106,965	)		5,147
Interest expense, net		37,499			29,526
Loss from continuing operations before
income taxes		(144,464	)		(24,379	)
Benefit for income taxes		(39,179	)		(9,206	)
Loss from continuing operations		(105,285	)		(15,173	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax in 2007		(2,045	)		5,119
Net loss	$	(107,330	)	$	(10,054	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,754		$	4,701
Accounts receivable		28,451			13,793
Other receivables		10,444			1,591
Merchandise inventories		442,738			611,488
Prepaid expenses and other		3,817			7,236
Total current assets		488,204			638,809
Fixed assets:
Building, equipment, fixtures and leasehold improvements		50,882			112,079
Less – accumulated depreciation and amortization		8,212			41,887
Fixed assets, net		42,670			70,192
Deferred charges and other assets, net		36,177			27,431
Total assets	$	567,051		$	736,432

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	$	236,241		$	224,231
Accounts payable – trade (including cash overdraft of $4,315 and $7,209
at January 31, 2009 and February 2, 2008, respectively)		34,116			110,475
Accrued liabilities:
Accrued salaries and benefits		14,304			15,799
Accrued miscellaneous taxes		8,907			7,162
Accrued interest		1,417			3,494
Deferred income		155			4,364
Deferred income taxes		11,232			16,009
Other		16,183			29,515
Income taxes payable		-			5,580
Due to parent		8,150			7,407
Total current liabilities		330,705			424,036
Senior Notes		40,582			200,000
Second Lien Notes		23,334			-
Third Lien Notes		169,031			-
Total long-term debt		232,947			200,000
Deferred income taxes		-			3,593
Other non-current liabilities		5,204			3,278
Total liabilities		568,856			630,907
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
Stockholder’s equity (deficiency):
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized 5,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 1,000 shares		-			-
Additional paid-in capital		85,975			85,975
Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)		(87,780	)		19,550
Total stockholder’s equity (deficiency)		(1,805	)		105,525
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity (deficiency)	$	567,051		$	736,432

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(in thousands, except share data)





							Retained			Total
	Common Stock				Additional		Earnings			Stockholder’s
	Number				Paid-in		(Accumulated			Equity			Comprehensive
	of Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit)			(Deficiency)			Loss
Balance, February 3, 2007		1,000	$	-	$	85,975	$	30,629		$	116,604
Net loss		-		-		-		(10,054	)		(10,054	)	$	(10,054	)
Comprehensive loss													$	(10,054	)
Effect of adoption of FIN 48		-		-		-		(1,025	)		(1,025	)
Balance, February 2, 2008		1,000		-		85,975		19,550			105,525
Net loss		-		-		-		(107,330	)		(107,330	)	$	(107,330	)
Comprehensive loss													$	(107,330	)
Balance, January 31, 2009		1,000	$	-	$	85,975	$	(87,780	)	$	(1,805	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Year Ended
	January 31, 2009			February 2, 2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(107,330	)	$	(10,054	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment charges and inventory write-down		58,901			3,009
Depreciation and amortization		20,109			15,718
Write-off of deferred financing costs		-			1,213
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,267			1,206
Payment-in-kind interest on Secured Notes		10,114			-
Deferred income tax benefit		(19,602	)		(1,547	)
Other, net		5,485			529
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisition
(Note 3):
(Increase) decrease in accounts and other receivables		(22,871	)		13,202
Decrease in merchandise inventories &n

FINLAY FINE JEWELRY CORP 10-K