UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

o REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _____________________ to ______________

File No. 333-127813

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc.

(Name of small business issuer in our charter)

Nevada	4600	20-1673271
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

P.O Box 488 Cut Bank, Montana	59427
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone 406-873-5580

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o		Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o		Smaller Reporting Company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of August 12, 2010, there were 9,118,000 shares issued and outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.

INDEX

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION			3
Item 1. Financial Statements			3
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation			10
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk			19
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			19
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION			20
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			20
Item 1A. Risk Factors			20
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			20
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			20
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)			20
Item 5. Other Information			20
Item 6. Exhibits.			20

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MAJESTIC OIL & GAS, INC. (A Development Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30
	2010			December 31
	UNAUDITED			2009

ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	60,052		$	110,701
Trade receivables		4,420			5,823

Total Current Assets		64,472			116,524

OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES
Oil and gas properties, using the full
cost method of accounting:
Properties being amortized		455,894			455,894
Properties not subject to amortization		212,230			202,531
Less accumulated depletion, amortization and impairment		(176,200	)		(164,000	)

Net Oil and Gas Properties		491,924			494,425

OTHER ASSETS
Website development costs (less accumulated amortization)		-			400

Total Other Assets		-			400

Total Assets	$	556,396		$	611,349

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	10,603		$	5,028
Production taxes and royalties payable		1,057			1,379
Well settlement payable		22,959			22,959

Total Current Liabilities		34,619			29,366

Asset retirement obligation		8,879			8,879

Total Liabilities		43,498			38,245

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, no par value-
Authorized Shares - 100,000,000
Issued & Outstanding: 9,118,000 shares at June 30, 2010;		1,314,500			1,272,500
8,918,000 at December 31, 2009
Additional paid in capital		19,295			19,295
(Deficit) accumulated during the development stage		(820,897	)		(718,691	)

Total Stockholders' Equity		512,898			573,104

Total Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity	$	556,396		$	611,349

MAJESTIC OIL & GAS, INC. (A Development Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

													Inception
	Three Months			Three Months			Six Months			Six Months			(April 16, 2002)
	Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended			through
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009			2010
	UNAUDITED			UNAUDITED			UNAUDITED			UNAUDITED			UNAUDITED
REVENUE	$	6,959		$	5,750		$	13,780		$	18,248		$	469,457

PRODUCTION (LIFTING) COSTS		5,545			4,071			10,879			9,529			150,842
EXPLORATION EXPENSES		-			-			-			-			3,862
DEPLETION, DEPRECIATION
AND AMORTIZATION		5,890			9,710			12,600			22,720			178,700

INCOME FROM OIL & GAS
PRODUCING ACTIVITIES		(4,476	)		(8,031	)		(9,699	)		(14,001	)		136,053
SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		78,224			17,807			92,507			38,229			956,950

NET (LOSS)	$	(82,700	)	$	(25,838	)	$	(102,206	)	$	(52,230	)	$	(820,897	)

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net Income, basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted average number of
shares outstanding		9,118,000			7,808,000			9,118,000			7,808,000
Diluted potential shares -
stock warrants		-			-			-			-
Adjusted weighted average shares		9,118,000			7,808,000			9,118,000			7,808,000

MAJESTIC OIL & GAS, INC. (A Development Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

									(Deficit)
									Accumulated
					Additional		Stock		During
	Common Stock				Paid In		Subscription		Development
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Receivable		Stage			Total

BEGINNING BALANCE, INCEPTION
(APRIL 16, 2002) TO
DECEMBER 31, 2004		-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Common stock issued		6,240,000		624,000		-		-		-			624,000
Net (loss)		-		-		-		-		(346,422	)		(346,422	)

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2004		6,240,000		624,000		-		-		(346,422	)		277,578
Common stock issued		-		-		-		-		-			-
Net income		-		-		-		-		66,381			66,381

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2005		6,240,000		624,000		-		-		(280,041	)		343,959
Common stock issued		-		-		-		-		-			-
Net (loss)		-		-		-		-		(20,068	)		(20,068	)

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2006		6,240,000		624,000		-		-		(300,109	)		323,891

Common stock issued for services		330,000		147,000		-		-		-			147,000
Common stock warrants exercised		938,000		234,500		-		-		-			234,500
Common stock options issued		-		-		19,295		-		-			19,295
Net (loss)		-		-		-		-		(255,025	)		(255,025	)

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2007		7,508,000		1,005,500		19,295		-		(555,134	)		469,661

Common stock issued		300,000		150,000		-		-		-			150,000
Net (loss)		-		-		-		-		(68,680	)		(68,680	)

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2008		7,808,000		1,155,500		19,295		-		(623,814	)		550,981

Common stock issued for services		100,000		16,000		-		-		-			16,000
Common stock issued		1,010,000		101,000		-		-		-			101,000
Net (loss)		-		-						(94,877	)		(94,877	)

BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2009		8,918,000		1,272,500		19,295		-		(718,691	)		573,104

Common stock issued for services		200,000		42,000		-		-		-			42,000
Net (loss) for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)		-		-		-		-		(102,206	)		(102,206	)

BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2010		9,118,000	$	1,314,500	$	19,295	$	-	$	(820,897	)	$	512,898

MAJESTIC OIL & GAS, INC. (A Development Stage Company)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

							Inception
	Six Months			Six Months			(April 16, 2002)
	Ended			Ended			Through
	June 30, 2010			June 30, 2009			June 30, 2010
	UNAUDITED			UNAUDITED			UNAUDITED

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss)	$	(102,206	)	$	(52,230	)	$	(820,897	)
Changes and credits to net (loss) not affecting cash
Depletion and amortization		12,600			22,720			178,700
Organizational expenses paid with stock		42,000			-			342,000
Legal fees paid with stock		-			-			188,000
Stock compensation expense		-			-			21,295
Changes in assets and liabilities
Trade receivables		1,403			18,321			(4,420	)
Deposits		-			-			-
Production taxes and royalties payable		(322	)		(3,124	)		1,057
Accounts payable		5,575			38			33,562

NET CASH FROM (USED FOR)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(40,950	)		(14,275	)		(60,703	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Website development		-			-			(2,500	)
Additions to oil and gas properties		(9,699	)		(7,018	)		(499,245	)

NET CASH (USED FOR) INVESTING
ACTIVITIES		(9,699	)		(7,018	)		(501,745	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of common stock		-			-			251,000
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		-			-			371,500

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING
ACTIVITIES		-			-			622,500

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS		(50,649	)		(21,293	)		60,052

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT
BEGINNING OF PERIOD		110,701			79,790			-

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT
END OF PERIOD	$	60,052		$	58,497		$	60,052

MAJESTIC OIL & GAS, INC. (A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Business Activity and Basis of Presentation

Principal Business Activity

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. (Company) is a development stage enterprise and its operations consist of oil and natural gas development and production in the Rocky Mountain region. The financial statements and notes to the financial statements are the representation of the Company's management, who is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. The accounting policies of the Company are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and conform to the standards applicable to development stage enterprises.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim financial statements of the Company are unaudited. In the opinion of management, the interim data includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. These interim financial statements contain certain reclassification of prior period amounts to be consistent with the current period presentation with no effect on net income or loss. We have prepared the financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. We believe the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading and recommend that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in our Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Note 2 - Basis of Accounting

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and extinguishment of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying condensed balance sheet the Company has an accumulated deficit of ($820,897) through June 30, 2010. This and other factors may indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The Company's financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the realization of the carrying value of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be considered necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence. The Company's ability to establish itself as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional financing in order to fund exploration and development activities of oil and gas interests and, ultimately, to achieve profitable operations. Management believes that it can be successful in obtain

These interim financial statements are prepared using the significant accounting policies disclosed in the Company's December 31, 2009 annual audited financial statements, except that certain significant accounting policies were adopted during the six months ended June 30, 2010:

Adopted prior to the six months ended June 30, 2010 -

Oil and Gas Interests

The Company utilizes the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas activities. Under this method, subject to a limitation based on estimated value, all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration and development, including costs of unsuccessful exploration, are capitalized within a cost center. No gain or loss is recognized upon the sale or abandonment of undeveloped or producing oil and gas interests unless the sale represents a significant portion of oil and gas interests and the gain significantly alters the relationship between capitalized costs and proved oil and gas reserves of the cost center. Depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil and gas interests is computed on the units of production method based on proved reserves, or upon reasonable estimates where proved reserves have not yet been established due to the recent commencement of production. Amortizable costs include estimates of future development costs of proved undeveloped reserves.

MAJESTIC OIL & GAS, INC. (A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Capitalized costs of oil and gas interests may not exceed an amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10%, of the estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves plus the cost, or estimated fair market value if lower, of unproved interests. Should capitalized costs exceed this ceiling, an impairment is recognized. The present value of estimated future net cash flows is computed by applying year end prices of oil and gas to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of year end, less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes oil and gas revenues from its interests in producing wells as oil and gas is produced and sold from the wells and when ultimate collection is reasonably assured.

Website Development Costs

The Company has capitalized the costs associated with development of its website, and is amortizing the cost over a three year period.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with current accounting standards which specify the revised accounting alternative requirements for pre-2006 stock based compensation grants existing at January 1, 2006 and the required accounting for new grants starting January 1, 2006. The Company had no stock based compensation grants made before year 2007.

Accordingly, the provisions pertaining to pre-2006 grants do not apply. The Company values its stock options awarded on or after January 1, 2006 at the fair value at grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation expense for stock options is recorded over the vesting period on a straight line basis. Compensation paid in vested stock is valued at the fair value at the applicable measurement date and charged to expense at that date.

Income Taxes

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions current accounting standards related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. These standards provide detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in the financial statements. Tax positions must meet a “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized upon the adoption of the standards and in subsequent periods. Upon the adoption of the standards, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. During 2009 and during the first six months of 2010, the Company recognized no adjustments for uncertain tax benefits.

Deferred income tax assets, if any, are adjusted by a valuation allowance, if necessary, to recognize future tax benefits only to the extent, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not such benefits will be realized. The Company would recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in general and administrative expenses. No interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were accrued at June 30, 2010. The Company expects no material changes to unrecognized tax positions within the next twelve months.

Earnings per Share of Common Stock

Basic earnings per share is determined in accordance with current accounting standards using net income divided by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding, assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued. The effect of outstanding common stock warrants was anti-dilutive for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

Fair Value Measurement

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted accounting standards related to measurement of fair value in its financial statements. These standards provide a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. These standards would apply to all financial instruments that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. Currently, the Company has no financial instruments to which this statement would apply.

MAJESTIC OIL & GAS, INC. (A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, accounting standards were issued related to the FASB's codification of accounting standards and the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles. The objective of these standards was to become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be applied by nongovernmental entities. The standards became effective for financial statement issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.

Management has adopted these standards.

In May 2009, accounting standards were issued related to events occuring subsequent to the balance sheet date, but prior to issuance of the financial statements. The objective of these standards is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued. Management has adopted these standards.

In December 2008 the SEC unanimously approved amendments to revise its oil and gas reserves estimation and disclosure requirements. The amendments, among other things, allows the use of new technologies to determine proved reserves; permits the optional disclosure of probable and possible reserves; modifies the prices used to estimate reserves for SEC disclosure purposes to a 12-month average instead of a period end price; and requires that if a third party is primarily responsible for preparing or auditing reserve estimates, the Company make disclosures relating to the independence and qualifications of the third party, including filing as an exhibit any report received from the third party. The revised rules are effective January 1, 2010. The new requirements do not have an impact on the Company’s 2009 financial statements.

Note 3 - Organization and Development of the Company

The Company was formed on April 16, 2002 as a corporation. The Company is considered a development stage enterprise. The accompanying interim financial statements reflect limited oil and gas development and production activities and they are not necessarily indicative of what the financial statements will reflect once the intended operations of the Company are fully underway.

Note 4 - Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company follows current accounting standards in accounting for its asset retirement obligations. These standards address financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. These accounting standards require recognition of the present value of obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred. As of June 30, 2010, the estimated future cost to plug and abandon the Company's gas wells was estimated to be $8,879. The estimated liability is based on historical experience in plugging and abandoning wells, estimated cost to plug and abandon wells in the future and federal and state regulatory requirements.

Note 5 - Related Party Transactions

Altamont Oil & Gas, Inc. (Altamont), an entity related through common ownership and management, is the operator of the wells in which the Company owns its working interests. As the operator of the wells, Altamont is responsible for remitting production taxes to the taxing authorities and royalty payments to the royalty interest owners. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had an outstanding receivable from Altamont of $4,420 for gas sales, and a payable to Altamont of $1,057 for production taxes and royalties. The Company also received an Authorization for Expenditure (AFE) for its share of costs associated with the Jody Fields #4-1 well, which remains under development as of June 30, 2010. The Company paid $5,547 to Altamont for development costs, and has a payable to Altamont of $22,959 for its remaining share of the AFE.

Note 6 - Farm Out Agreement

During 2007, the Company entered into a Farm-out Agreement with Altamont Oil & Gas, Inc and Numbers, Inc., an entity related through common ownership and management, to conduct a 10-well natural gas development program. This development program is still pending and will involve the drilling of 5 wells in the Lake Frances Gas Field and 5 wells in the Williams Gas Field, located in Pondera County, Montana. The Lake Frances Field is located south of Valier, Montana just offsetting the Lake Frances reservoir. The Williams Field is located 7 miles east of the town of Valier, Montana.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, the Financial Statements of the Company and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report. Historical results and percentage relationships among any amounts in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of trends in operating results for any future period. The statements, which are not historical facts contained in this Report, including this Plan of Operations, and Notes to the Financial Statements, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Future events and the Company's actual results August differ materially from the results reflected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, dependence on existing and future key strategic and strategic end-user customers, limited ability to establish new strategic relationships, ability to sustain and manage growth, variability of operating results, the Company's expansion and development of new service lines, marketing and other business development initiatives, the commencement of new engagements, competition in the industry, general economic conditions, dependence on key personnel, the ability to attract, hire and retain personnel who possess the technical skills and experience necessary to meet the service requirements of its clients, the potential liability with respect to actions taken by its existing and past employees, risks associated with international sales, and other risks described herein and in the Company's other SEC filings.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this report.

OVERVIEW

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. is engaged in the exploration, development, acquisition and operation of oil and natural gas properties. Because oil and natural gas exploration and development requires significant capital and because our assets and resources are limited, we participate in the gas industry through the purchase of interests in either producing wells or oil and natural gas exploration, development and production projects.

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. is a development stage company, and as such it is difficult for us to forecast our revenues or earnings accurately. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance as we have and will have no backlog of orders. Our operating results in one or more future quarters may fall below investor expectations which, assuming our common stock trades on a recognized market, would almost certainly cause the future trading price of our common stock to decline. You should read the following discussion together with the condensed consolidated financial statements and their accompanying notes, included elsewhere in the report.

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. participated in drilling programs in the Lake Frances Field during 2007 and 2008. Four successful gas wells have been drilled to-date; the B Ag #25-1, Vandenbos #19-1, Boucher #18-1 and Stoltz #18-1. Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. holds a 25% Working Interest in these four wells and the Company expects to see an increase in production volumes, as a result of these wells. In addition, Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. participated in the drilling of the Vandenbos #19-2 and the Jody Fields #4-1. The Vandenbos #19-2 well was subsequently plugged and abandoned, as was the Jody Fields #4-1 well, which was a wildcat oil well.

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. entered into a farm-out agreement with Mountain View Energy, Inc. on September 1, 2009, outlining parameters for Mountain View Energy, Inc. to drill a test well in the NWSE-Section 33-T27N-R4W, Teton County, MT at its sole cost, risk and expense. In doing so, Mountain View Energy, Inc., would acquire 75% of the Working Interest, while Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. would retain a 25% Working Interest in any well drilled in the 40-acre tract.

Accordingly, on September 9, 2009, drilling commenced drilling on the Donovan #33-3 well located in the West Pondera Field, SWNWSE – Section 33-T27N-R4W, Teton County, Montana. The well was successfully drilled and completed with an initial production of 15 barrels of oil per day with no water. The producing interval is the Madison/Sun River Dolomite with 20 feet of pay from 2,125’ to 2,145’.

Due to the success of the Donovan #33-3, a second oil well was drilled in the West Pondera Field. The Donovan #33-2 is located in the SENWSE - Section 33-T27N-R4W, Teton County, Montana. This oil well was successfully drilled and completed with initial production of 2 to 4 barrels of oil per day.

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. entered into a farm-out agreement with Altamont Oil & Gas, Inc., and subsequently with Hartford Energy, Inc., to conduct the re-entry of the Fields #14-34. As per the farm-out agreement with Hartford Energy, Inc., the Company retained a 25% Working Interest in this well. The Fields #14-34 is located in the Loneman Coulee Field, Pondera County, Montana and was completed as a Madison/Sun River oil well with initial production of 5 barrels of oil per day.

Based upon our Management's experience in the oil and natural gas industry and on recent events, including increasing global demand for energy and energy disruptions caused by natural disasters, we believe the trend in oil and gas prices will remain relatively stable or decrease slightly, but over the long-term are more likely to increase. We expect to generate positive net income from operations in the future, although our revenue and expenses will increase as we expand our drilling and ownership activities. However, the current economic crisis could have a negative impact on the Company’s revenues due to the recent decrease in oil and natural gas prices. During the course of 2009, Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. saw a significant decrease in the price received per MCF at a high of $3.09 and a low of $1.19, as detailed under “Results of Operation.” To-date in 2010, the Company received a high of $2.80 per MCF and a low of $1.81 per MCF. The current trend shows a continued decline in pricing. The price we receive for our production directly affects the amount of revenues we generate, which in turn affects the Company’s liquidity and overall financial position.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 vs.Three Months Ended June 30, 2009:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010		Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenue	$	6,959	$	5,750
Expenses	$	(89,659)	$	(31,588)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(82,700)	$	(25,838)

Revenues for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 were $6,959 compared to $5,750 for the period ended June 30, 2009. There was a decrease in the gas revenues between these two periods as a result of the lower natural gas production slightly offset by a higher price received per MCF and oil production.

Ludwig State 36-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
April		168.92		2.01		194.49		1.56
May		150.56		1.81		207.28		1.41
June		169.13		1.94		198.83		1.59

Boucher 27-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
April		43.31		2.01		44.76		1.56
May		40.01		1.81		47.23		1.41
June		38.57		1.94		47.64		1.59

B. Ag #25-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
April		32.40		2.01		35.60		1.56
May		27.80		1.81		37.80		1.41
June		34.60		1.94		38.60		1.59

Vandenbos #19-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
April		298.24		2.01		551.10	1.56
May		247.91		1.81		494.59	1.41
June		278.03		1.94		451.69	1.59

Boucher #18-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
April		149.75		2.01		299.89		1.56
May		130.25		1.81		237.81		1.41
June		147.75		1.94		196.76		1.59

Stoltz #18-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
April		0.41		2.01		8.13		1.56
May		2.64		1.81		10.77		1.41
June		5.48		1.94		15.03		1.59

Majestic Oil & Gas Operations, Inc’s Net Share of the production volumes from the Ludwig State #36-1, Boucher #27-1, B. Ag #25-1, Vandenbos #19-1, Boucher #18-1 and Stoltz #18-1 wells for three month period ended June 30, 2010 were 1,966 MCF compared to 3,118 MCF for three month period ended June 30, 2009. The production decrease is a result of natural decline in production over time.

Our total expenses increase by $58,071 from the $31,588 reported for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the $89,659 reported for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Of those expenses, there was an increase in the Selling, General & Administrative Expenses of $60,417 from the $78,224 reported for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the $17,807 reported for the same three month period in 2009. The primary reason for the increase was an increase of approximately $48,900 in engineering and professional fees incurred, which are comprised mainly of legal, accounting, and auditing fees. Professional fees included the issuance of $42,000 in Company stock for services provided. In addition, the Company saw an increase in Consulting Fees of $4,691 and $4,060 in Public Relations costs associated with the design and maintenance of the Company’s new website. As mentioned above, revenues for the three month period decreased as a result of lower production volumes offset by a slightly higher price per MCF.

The Company showed a Net Loss of ($82,700) for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This compares to the Net Loss of ($25,838) for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The variance between these three month periods is directly related to the decrease in revenues and volumes during the Second Quarter 2010 and increase in selling, general, & administrative expense as discussed above. While it is the Company’s hope that production volumes increase as a result of its planned development and drilling program, the Company’s revenues are subject to the volatility of natural gas prices, which continue to fluctuate dramatically.

The Company also plans to continue its pursuit of oil prospects in the Lake Frances Area, which if successful, could contribute to an increase in future revenues. The price of crude oil also continues to fluctuate but not to the same extreme as the price of natural gas. In spite of the fluctuations in the price of oil and natural gas, Management is still confident that we will build the Company through continued drilling of oil and natural gas prospects.

Drilling Activity

The following table sets forth the results of our drilling activities during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Drilling Activity
	Gross Wells						Net Wells
Three Months ended June 30,	Total		Producing		Dry		Total		Producing		Dry
2010		0		0		0		0		0		0
2009		0		0		0		0		0		0

Net Production, Average Sales Price and Average Production Costs (Lifting)

The table below sets forth the net quantities of oil and gas production (net of all royalties, overriding royalties and production due to others) attributable to the Company for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the average sales price, and average production costs (including depreciation, depletion and amortization, lease operating costs and all associated taxes) on a per unit of production basis:

Three Months ended June 30,	2010		2009
Net Production
Oil (Bbls)		39		0
Gas (Mcf)		1,966		3,118

Average Sales Prices
Oil (per Bbl)	$	64.98	$	0
Gas (per Mcf)	$	1.85	$	1.52

Average Production Cost Per MCF	$	5.20	$	4.42

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2009:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2010		Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenue	$	13,780	$	18,248
Expenses	$	(115,986)	$	(70,478)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(102,206)	$	(52,230)

Revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 were $13,780 compared to $18,248 for the period ended June 30, 2009. There was a decrease in the revenues between these two periods as a result of lower natural gas production slightly offset by a slightly higher price received per MCF.

Ludwig State 36-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
January		175.93		2.35		231.21		3.09
February		192.02		2.26		211.20		2.34
March		175.93		2.80		218.83		1.80
April		168.92		2.01		194.49		1.56
May		150.56		1.81		207.28		1.41
June		169.13		1.94		198.83		1.59

Boucher 27-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
January		47.64		2.35		110.14		3.09
February		47.64		2.26		71.16		2.34
March		43.11		2.80		56.72		1.80
April		43.31		2.01		44.76		1.56
May		40.01		1.81		47.23		1.41
June		38.57		1.94		47.64		1.59

B. Ag #25-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
January		33.80		2.35		38.80		3.09
February		31.00		2.26		33.80		2.34
March		32.80		2.80		36.80		1.80
April		32.40		2.01		35.60		1.56
May		27.80		1.81		37.80		1.41
June		34.60		1.94		38.60		1.59

Vandenbos #19-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
January		361.56		2.35		708.06		3.09
February		352.48		2.26		632.57		2.34
March		305.66		2.80		683.72		1.80
April		298.24		2.01		551.10		1.56
May		247.91		1.81		494.59		1.41
June		278.03		1.94		451.69		1.59

Boucher #18-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
January		211.00		2.35		413.33		3.09
February		212.25		2.26		356.40		2.34
March		168.00		2.80		365.48		1.80
April		149.75		2.01		299.89		1.56
May		130.25		1.81		237.81		1.41
June		147.75		1.94		196.76		1.59

Stoltz #18-1	Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF		Share of Production Volumes		Price Per MCF
	2010				2009
January		0.20		2.35		27.83		3.09
February		0.41		2.26		19.50		2.34
March		0.61		2.80		13.41		1.80
April		0.41		2.01		8.13		1.56
May		2.64		1.81		10.77		1.41
June		5.48		1.94		15.03		1.59

Donovan #33-3

Share of

Production

Volumes

Price

Per

BBL

Share of

Production

Volumes

Price

Per

BBL

2010

2009

January

February

39.38

64.98

March

April

May

June

Majestic Oil & Gas Operations, Inc’s Net Share of the production volumes from the Ludwig State #36-1, Boucher #27-1, B. Ag #25-1, Vandenbos #19-1, Boucher #18-1 and Stoltz #18-1 wells for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 were 4,358 MCF compared to 7,347 MCF for the six month period ended June 30, 2009. The production decrease is a result of natural decline in production over time.

Our total expenses increased by $45,508 from the $70,478 reported for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the $115,986 reported for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Of those expenses, Production (Lifting) Costs increased by $1,351 from $9,529 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $10,879 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is directly attributable to the Company’s share of the costs associated with the new Donovan wells. There was an increase in the Selling, General & Administrative Expenses of $54,278 from the $38,229 reported for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the $92,507 reported for the same six month period in 2010. The primary reason for the increase was an increase of approximately $46,700 in engineering, professional, and consulting fees incurred, which are comprised mainly of legal, accounting, and auditing fees. Professional fees included the issuance of $42,000 in Company stock for services provided. In addition, the Company saw a $4,060 in Public Relations costs associated with the design and maintenance of the Company’s new website. Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization decreased $10,120 from $22,720 reported for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the $12,600 reported for the same six month period in 2010. This decrease is directly attributable to the decrease in production volumes between the two periods. As mentioned above, revenues for the six month period decreased as a result of lower production volumes offset by a slightly higher price per MCF.

The Company showed a Net Loss of ($102,206) for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This compares to the Net Loss of ($52,230) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The variance between these six month periods is directly related to the decrease in revenues and volumes during the first two quarter of 2010 and increase in selling, general, & administrative expense as discussed above. While it is the Company’s hope that production volumes increase as a result of its planned development and drilling program, the Company’s revenues are subject to the volatility of natural gas prices, which continue to fluctuate dramatically.

Drilling Activity

The following table sets forth the results of our drilling activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Drilling Activity
	Gross Wells						Net Wells
Six Months ended June 30,	Total		Producing		Dry		Total		Producing		Dry
2010		0		0		0		0		0		0
2009		0		0		0		0		0		0

Net Production, Average Sales Price and Average Production Costs (Lifting)

The table below sets forth the net quantities of oil and gas production (net of all royalties, overriding royalties and production due to others) attributable to the Company for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the average sales price, and average production costs (including depreciation, depletion and amortization, lease operating costs and all associated taxes) on a per unit of production basis:

Six Months ended June 30,	2010			2009
Net Production
Oil (Bbls)		39		0
Gas (Mcf)		4,358		7,347

Average Sales Prices
Oil (per Bbl)	$	64.98	$	0
Gas (per Mcf)	$	2.12	$	2.05

Average Production Cost Per MCF	$	5.11	$	4.39

LIQUIDITY AND RESOURCE CAPITAL

We are still a development stage company. From our inception to June 30, 2010, we incurred an accumulated deficit of ($820,897). This deficit is primarily the result of approximately $300,000 in expenses associated with stock issuances during fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002, and $322,000 in legal, accounting and filing fees incurred since inception associated with being a publicly traded company. As of June 30, 2010, we had $60,052 of current cash available. Our cash resources of $60,052 are not sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements over the next 12 months.

We hope to be able to raise additional funds from an offering of our stock in the future. We are currently offering or contemplating the offering of a limited number of subscriptions for up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.25 per share. The cash proceeds of this offering will be used to close the following Acquisitions:

Acquiring all right, title and interest from Altamont Oil & Gas & Numbers, Inc., both Affiliates, in the Williams and Lake Frances Gas Field

Acquiring all right, title and interest from Genesis Energy Inc. and Immgen in the Williams and Lake Frances Gathering System

The Company is currently contemplating the following additional offerings:

Share offering for an additional $10,000,000 or 40,000,000 shares at $0.25/share in order to finance the acquisition of the Montana/North Dakota acreage.

Share offering of $50,000,000 by way of a offering of 20,000,000 shares at $2.50 per share. Such funding to be used for development drilling.

However, these offerings may not occur, or if they occur, may not raise the required funding. We may also consider securing debt financing. We may not raise other equity or debt financing sufficient to fund these plans. If we don't raise or generate these funds, the implementation of our business plan will be delayed or eliminated.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise funds to implement our planned development; however we August not be able to raise sufficient funds to do so. Our independent auditors have indicated that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months. Our poor financial condition could inhibit our ability to achieve our business plan.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On July 1, 2004, the Company entered into an operating agreement with Altamont Oil & Gas, Inc., through which Altamont Oil & Gas, Inc. will operate the wells in which we have acquired a working interest. Our share of monthly operating costs will be deducted from our monthly share of production revenue.

Beginning in 2007, the Company has acquired leases covering approximately 3,963 net acres of undeveloped land for the purpose of future oil and gas development. This acreage is located in Pondera County, Montana in the vicinity of the Williams and Lake Frances Gas Fields. These leases remain in good standing with the term of the leases being for periods of 3 or 5 years. Management considers the value of the properties to be as much or more than for what they were acquired.

Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. entered into a farm-out agreement with Mountain View Energy, Inc. on September 1, 2009, outlining parameters for Mountain View Energy, Inc. to drill a test well in the NWSE-Section 33-T27N-R4W, Teton County, MT at its sole cost, risk and expense. In doing so, Mountain View Energy, Inc. would acquire 75% of the Working Interest, while Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. would retain a 25% Working Interest in any well drilled in the 40-acre tract.

On June 17, 2010, the Company entered into a lease purchase agreement to acquire leases covering approximately 11,106 net acres of undeveloped land for the purpose of future oil and gas development. These acreages are located in Montana and North Dakota. The purchase is expected to close on August 30, 2010.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Not applicable

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act (defined below). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer/principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, including our Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

In addition, our management with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer have determined that no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during or subsequent to the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is (as that term is defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not applicable.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

(a)

Exhibits.

Exhibit		Item
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*		Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

* This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MAJESTIC OIL & GAS, INC.

Date: August 16, 2010	By:	/s/ Patrick Montalban
		(Authorized Officer/principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer/principal Financial Officer}

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit		Item
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*		Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

MAJESTIC OIL & GAS 10-Q