UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ______________ to ______________

Commission file number: 000-1471089

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		26-4722406
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1600
Los Angeles CA		90024
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 443-4116

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g): None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x

The registrant is a voluntary filer of reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and has filed all such reports during the preceding 12 months.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No. x

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the last sale price as of June 30, 2011 was $23,307,500.

As of March 30, 2012, the outstanding number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share was 10,250,000.

Documents incorporated by reference: none

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment No. 2”) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Manthey Redmond Corporation (together with its subsidiary, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 5, 2012 (the “2011 Annual Report”), is being filed to incorporate the Company’s revisions and responses pursuant to certain comment letters from the Staff of the SEC dated October 19 and December 3, 2012 (the “SEC Comment Letters”).

As required by Rule 12b-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, new certifications by the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are filed herewith as exhibits to this Amendment No. 2.

This Amendment No. 2 does not affect any other portion of the 2011 Annual Report. Additionally, except as specifically referenced herein, this Amendment No. 2 does not reflect any event occurring after April 5, 2012, the filing date of the 2011 Annual Report.

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION

Form 10-K/A

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011

Table of Contents

		Page
PART I

1.	Business	3
1A.	Risk Factors	6
1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	10
2.	Properties	10
3.	Legal Proceedings	10
4.	(removed and reserved)	10

PART II

5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	10
6.	Selected Financial Data	11
7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	12
8.	Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	13
9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	14
9A.	Controls and Procedures	14
9B.	Other Information	14

PART III

10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	15
11.	Executive Compensation	16
12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	16
13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	17
14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	18

PART IV

15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	18

SIGNATURES		19

PART I

Item 1. Business

Pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that reflect our estimates, expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts. These statements are often identified by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information available to us and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward- looking statements we make in this Annual Report. The discussion in the section “Risk Factors” in Item 1A. of this Annual Report highlight some of the more important risks identified by management but should not be assumed to be the only factors that could affect our future performance. Additional risk factors may be described from time to time in our future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Risk factors are difficult to predict, contain material uncertainties that may affect actual results and may be beyond our control. Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason. Unless otherwise indicated or required by the context, as used in this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, “MRC” and the terms “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Manthey Redmond Corporation. Manthey Redmond Corporation and MRC are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Manthey Redmond Corporation. in the United States and/or other countries. All other trademarks, service marks or trade names (if any) referred to in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners.

General

Manthey Redmond Corporation (MRC) is a development stage company incorporated in Delaware in April, 2009, to exploit and market certain internal combustion engine technology now leased by it from its Australian affiliate, Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Limited. Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Limited., an Australian corporation ("Manthey Redmond (Aust)"), is the owner and developer of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine, a fuel-efficient, lightweight, low-emission, multi-fuel engine smaller and less expensive than conventional internal combustion engines initially targeted for marine applications.

The Company has entered into two agreements with Manthey Redmond (Aust): (i) the licensing agreement for the development, manufacture, use, sale, and sublicense of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine and all developed technology and products related to the technology (the "Technology") for a royalty payment to Manthey Redmond (Aust) of 5% of annual gross profits and (ii) an investment agreement by which Manthey Redmond (Aust) will fund the Company with monthly payments of $40,000, up to a maximum of $4,200,000 to assist the Company in its commercialization and development of the Technology. These two agreements and the development agreement discussed below are with Australian affiliates that are owned and controlled by the officer and directors of the Company.

MRC has also entered into a development agreement with Manthey Holdings Pty Limited for the non-exclusive use of Manthey Holdings' engineering facility and employees for research and development of and related to the Technology for a monthly fee of $30,000. Manthey Holdings is a 29.6% shareholder in the Company. The Company anticipates that it will endeavor to form co-development agreements and/or license agreements to succeed the development agreement. However, in the event that such relationships are not developed or not developed sufficiently to manufacture and develop the engines, the Company maintains a direct relationship with the Manthey Holding's facility which contemplates the possible extension of the development agreement.

Although the Technology is leased from an Australian company and the research and development facility is outsourced to Australia, MRC intends to market the Technology principally in the United States and will seek to form alliances with U.S. based manufacturers for such market development. The Company will, at least initially, utilize the facilities of its Australian affiliate for the research, design and development of the Technology but the focus of such research, design and development will be for use and success of the Technology and Eco-Engine in the American market. Although outsourcing the research and manufacturing., the Company anticipates building its sales and marketing network in the United States with a business plan and focus directed to the U.S. market.

In addition to the revenue provided by Manthey Redmond (Aust), Manthey Redmond (US) will seek to raise revenue through co-development and co-licensing agreements with manufacturers principally located in the United States. Manthey Redmond (US) intends to market and sell the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engines in the United States and to develop the sale of such engines for use in the stationary generator market in the United States. To develop such market, Manthey Redmond (US) intends to commence private demonstrations of its prototype engines targeted to manufacturers of internal combustion engines, government agencies engaged in internal combustion engine research and development, and other consumers, including governmental, of internal combustion engines. The Company has not entered into any co-development or co-licensing agreements with manufacturers in the United States as of the date of this filing.

The Company anticipates that Steven Manthey, President of the Company, will conduct most of such demonstrations. Steven Manthey resides outside the United States and when he is not in the U.S., the business operations of the Company are conducted outside the U.S. as well. Likewise, prototypes built pursuant to the Development Agreement will be built in Australia until transported to the United States for the demonstrations or pursuant to a sale or other commercial agreement. Accordingly, the Company has no assets in the United States as of the date of this filing but maintains an executive office suite in Los Angeles, California, to develop as its American company headquarters.

By securing the use of the research and development facility, MRC will be able to develop prototypes tailored to specific applications, such as the stationary generator market, outboard and inboard marine market, heavy freight vehicle market, construction and rail vehicle markets and agricultural vehicle market. The research and development facility has the capability to manufacture these tailored products on a commercial scale thereby allowing MRC to market and sell the engines directly without utilizing other manufacturers. Management realizes possible inherent limitations associated with having a facility situated in Australia, but it believes that it can initially meet production requirements from this facility and as demand increases, it can establish manufacturing facilities within the United States.

The Agreements

The two agreements with Manthey Redmond (Aust) contain no restrictions on the Company on how to develop and commercialize the Technology but pursuant to the patent licensing agreement the Company is obligated to cover all costs associated with the protection of the Technology including patent application and maintenance fees. The Company is not obligated to use funds received under the investment agreement to pay obligations owed under the patent license agreement or development agreement if it were able to raise funds elsewhere. However, until such time as the Company can develop another source of revenue to meet its patent license and development agreement obligations, it will be necessary for it to use the funds from the investment agreement to pay those obligations. Pursuant to the development agreement with Manthey Holdings, the Company is obligated to fund the ongoing development of the Technology by its inventor, Steven Charles Manthey, the president and a director of the Company. The development agreement with Manthey Holdings not only secures the non-exclusive use of a development facility, but also ensures the ongoing involvement of Steven Charles Manthey, its sole director and shareholder. Payments under the development agreement to Manthey Holdings were scheduled to commence in November, 2009 to coincide with the delivery of the newest prototype.

Steven Charles Manthey is the president and a director of the Company and beneficial owner of 29.6% of the Company's outstanding shares. He is also the sole officer, director and shareholder of Manthey Holdings, the company with which the Company has the development agreement.

In regard to Manthey Redmond (Aust), the source of the Company's current funding, and Manthey Redmond Corporation, the board of directors of each company is identical, namely consisting of Steven Charles Manthey, Geoffrey Redmond and Timothy John Eric Redmond.

Until such time as MRC is able to enter into co-development or co-licensing agreements or to develop a sales market for its engines, it is financially reliant on the funding provided by the agreements entered into with Manthey Redmond (Aust).

Given that the composition of the boards of directors of Manthey Redmond (Aust) and Manthey Redmond (US) is identical, there is a risk that the directors could vary or cancel the terms of the Investment Agreement by which Manthey Redmond receives its current funding and thereby compromise the capacity of Manthey Redmond (US) to continue its development and operations if it has not by such time secured other sources of revenue.

The principal offices of the Company are located at 10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1600, Los Angeles, California 90024 and its telephone number is 310-443-4116.

The Technology

The Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine is a newly-developed, fuel-efficient, lightweight, low-emission, multi-fuel engine smaller and less expensive than conventional internal combustion engines. The Technology will be initially targeted for use in marine engines (both inboard and outboard engines) but is also applicable to, and will be marketed to, the stationary generator market, heavy freight vehicle market, construction vehicle market, locomotive market and agricultural vehicle market. During the three years in development, three prototypes of the Technology have been produced with the third prototype to be available for demonstration in the U.S. market in 2012. The three year development period has been supervised by the inventor of the Technology (Steven Charles Manthey) and the three prototypes have operated without any critical component failure. Like other newly-developed technology, the Technology runs the risk that the ultimate level of advancement from development will not be sufficiently superior to existing technology to warrant market place advantage. Management believes, from the results of its prototype testing and comparison of the Technology to current internal combustion engines, that internal combustion engines developed from the Technology are capable of halving the size of internal combustion engines currently available in the market and dramatically reducing the weight. Management believes that the Technology's sustainable advantage arises from the reduction in uses of natural resources to build and fuel internal combustion engines and the related reduction in emissions.

Report on Development of Technology

Development of the company’s licensed Technology is conducted in a competitive business environment as new technology related to internal combustion engines attempting to make engines more fuel efficient and more economical appear on the market frequently. The successful marketing of the Technology will depend on the ability of the Company to demonstrate sustainable advantages over existing proven and other newly developed technology. Specifically, the licensed Technology must prove successful in field testing and match dynamometer performances that earlier prototypes of the Technology realized during laboratory testing.

Since the original 2009 prototype completed proof-of-concept status, subsequent prototypes (through ongoing advancements to various internal components) have yielded greater torque - output whilst maintaining the same cylinder displacement during dynamometer testing. In mid 2012 this ongoing refinement of the licensed Technology progressed to marine field testing. This development milestone was delayed until a marine vessel was properly adapted for prototype testing - a task undertaken by the Manthey Holdings’ development facility (the facility) in 2011 and completed by mid 2012.

Once initial marine field testing commenced in mid 2012 it continued for approximately six (6) weeks so as to evaluate the performance of the engine in various conditions and under various loads in a marine environment. Considerable data was collated during this period of evaluation by the facility’s development team. Analysis by the facility’s development team (and particularly the inventor Steven Manthey) of the data highlighted that greater performance could be realized through the improved design of certain engine components. In particular the data highlighted that greater thermal efficiency was available for this latest prototype through improvements to air/fuel flow into the engine and also by raising the prototype’s in-cylinder compression ratio. Such enhancements, if successful, can translate into a more fuel efficient engine and further support the marketing of the licensed Technology and its performance when compared to our competitors’ current and future products.

The facility has elected to test the prototype (incorporating the new components) in the marine field testing vessel instead of on its laboratory’s dynamometer in the first instance. Ultimately the current prototype will also be tested on the facility’s dynamometer as it will enable additional data to be collated (particularly data related to emissions) to both further evaluate the performance of this prototype and identify possible enhancements whilst also providing data for future marketing purposes.

Future Research and Development

The current prototype is spark-ignited and is expected to have reached a suitable stage for marketing purposes to commence once the prototype has been evaluated on the Australia facility’s dynamometer as discussed above. Marketing of this engine will focus on the small to mid range powered engines in various applications. Future research planned for the Facility will target much larger applications such as heavy duty trucks and industrial power supply. This research will center on the development of compression-ignition prototypes of the licensed Technology.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to our investors. This section contains forward-looking statements. You should refer to the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements set forth at the beginning of Item 1 of this Annual Report.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We face competition and technological advances by competitors. There is significant competition among companies that design and manufacture internal combustion engines. Newly developed products could be more mechanically efficient and/or cost efficient than our current or future products. We also face indirect competition from vehicles using alternative fuels such as electricity.

We depend on intellectual property and the failure to protect our intellectual property could adversely affect our future growth and success. As part of the ongoing commercialization strategy of the licensed Technology, a revised provisional patent was filed by the Licensor in August 2012 and now forms part of the licensed Technology to the Company. This revised provisional patent incorporates the enhancements referred to above.

We rely on patent, trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection, and confidentiality and other agreements with affiliates, employees, customers, partners and others to protect our intellectual property. However, some of our intellectual property is not covered by any patent or patent application, and, despite precautions, it may be possible for third parties to obtain and use our intellectual property without authorization.

We do not know whether any patents will be issued from pending or future patent applications or whether the scope of the issued patents is sufficiently broad to protect our technologies or processes. Moreover, patent applications and issued patents may be challenged or invalidated. We could incur substantial costs in prosecuting or defending patent infringement suits. Furthermore, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S.

As part of our confidentiality procedures, we generally have entered into nondisclosure agreements with affiliates, employees, consultants and corporate partners. We also have attempted to control access to and distribution of our technologies, documentation and other proprietary information. We plan to continue these procedures. Despite these procedures, third parties could copy or otherwise obtain and make unauthorized use of our technologies or independently develop similar technologies. The steps that we have taken and that may occur in the future might not prevent misappropriation of our solutions or technologies, particularly in foreign countries where laws or law enforcement practices may not protect the proprietary rights as fully as in the U.S.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in protecting our proprietary rights. Any infringement upon our intellectual property rights could have an adverse effect on our ability to develop and sell commercially competitive internal combustion engines.

Potential for revenue may fluctuate due to certain regulatory, marketing and competitive factors over which we have little or no control.

The factors listed below, some of which we cannot control, may cause our potential for revenue and results of operations to fluctuate significantly:

Actions taken by regulatory bodies relating to the verification, registration or health effects of our products.

The timing and size of customer purchases.

Customer and/or business partners concerns about the stability of our business which could cause them to seek alternatives to our solutions and products.

Increases in raw material costs

loss of key engineering personnel

loss of key executive personnel

Failure to attract and retain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our future success.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain future key personnel, additional qualified management, marketing, scientific and engineering personnel, and develop and maintain relationships with research institutions and other outside consultants. The loss of key personnel (including the loss of key personnel employed by or contracted to Manthey Holdings Pty Ltd) or the inability to hire or retain qualified personnel, or the failure to assimilate effectively such personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

The Company is a development-stage company with no operating history of its own.

Because the Company is a development-stage company with no operating history, it is impossible for an investor to assess the performance of the Company or to determine whether the Company will meet its projected business plan. The Company has limited financial results upon which an investor may judge its potential. The likelihood of its success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered by a small developing company starting a new business enterprise and the highly competitive environment in which it will operate. Since MRC does not have a substantial operating history, it cannot assure an investor that its business will be profitable or that it will ever generate sufficient revenues to meet its expenses and support its anticipated activities.

The Investment Agreement between the Company and Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd is governed by and enforceable under the laws of Queensland, Australia and the Company's officer and directors control Manthey Redmond (Aust), therefore if Manthey Redmond (Aust) were to breach its agreement to fund the Company there may be little or no likelihood that the officer and director would seek its enforcement and even if they chose to so enforce such enforcement of the $40,000 monthly investment payment may be difficult or impossible.

Pursuant to the investment contract between the Company and Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd, Manthey Redmond (Aust) makes a monthly payment to the Company of $40,000 for assistance in the development and commercialization of the Technology. Should Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd stop making or reduce such investment payments, the Company would be required to enforce the contract in Queensland, Australia and such enforcement may be too costly for the Company to undertake. Also, because the directors and controlling shareholders of Manthey Redmond (Aust) are also the directors of the Company, a conflict may exist and the directors of the Company may determine, in breach of their duty to the Company, not to attempt to enforce the Investment Agreement. In addition, if the Company determined to enforce the contract in Queensland, Australia, it may be at a significant disadvantage as such long distance legal matter may be difficult to pursue and difficult to obtain a favorable judgment. The loss of funding source for the Company would impact its ability to proceed with its business plan in developing and marketing the commercial applications of the Eco-Engine and developing additional technology.

Previous payments made by the Redmond Family Holdings provide no assurance that such payments will continue.

Redmond Family Holdings has provided at least $50,000 per month to Manthey Redmond (Aust) since October 2007. This payment is the source of funds by which Manthey Redmond (Aust) intends to meet its contractual obligation pursuant to the Investment Agreement to fund the Company $40,000 per month. History of the payments by the Redmond Family Holdings is not a guarantee such payments will continue. Unforeseen circumstances or other changes may, for whatever reason, make the Redmond Family Holdings unable or unwilling to continue such monthly payments. The Company has a contractual right to the continuation of these payments, but enforcement of such contract may be difficult if not impossible if such contract were breached.

The success of the development and manufacturing of the Technology by the Company is unknown and contains many inherent risks.

The company is dependent upon the performance and ultimate marketability of the Technology which is untested in the market place. The continuing development stage of the Technology and related internal combustion engines may reveal failures in the Technology presently unknown and unanticipated by the Company and that can not be resolved with adequate research and development. Such failures may not be immediately readily apparent and may occur only after engines are placed in different applications or different climates throughout the world. Likewise, at the manufacturing stage, development and/or cost issues may arise presently unknown or unanticipated by the Company that render the production of engines based on the Technology on a commercial scale impractical.

The Company may not be able to market the Technology as easily and readily as it currently anticipates.

The internal combustion engine market is a highly competitive market and new technology related to the internal combustion engine attempting to make engines more fuel efficient and more economical appears on the market frequently. The successful marketing of the Technology will depend on the ability of the Company to demonstrate sustainable advantages over existing proven and other newly developed technology and the ability of the Company to fund the marketing of these advantages. The Company believes that its Technology is highly competitive and provides provable and sufficient advantages but the Company cannot predict what new technology is being developed that may impact on the Company's Technology and make it less attractive.

The controlling directors and beneficial shareholders of Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd are the directors and officers of the Company which creates a conflict of interest.

The directors and beneficial and controlling shareholders of Manthey Redmond (Aust) are Steven Charles Manthey, Timothy John Eric Redmond and Geoffrey Redmond who are also the directors of the Company. As such they control the actions of Manthey Redmond (Aust). If for any reason, they should determine not to continue the research, development and commercialization of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine, they could effect Manthey Redmond (Aust) board action to terminate or breach the agreements with the Company providing the monthly investment of $40,000 and the licensing rights to the patent Eco-Engine and Technology; and as directors of the Company, they would also be in a position to determine whether to pursue legal enforcement of either or both of the agreements. In effect, they could breach the development agreement and/or the patent licensing agreement with the Company with no likely enforcement actions. As directors of the Company, Messrs. Redmond and Mr. Manthey have an obligation and duty to act in the best interests of the Company and make the best business judgment for it; however, they each have this same duty and obligation to Manthey Redmond (Aust) as directors of it as well and a breach of the agreements with the Company may be in the best interests and be the best business judgment for that company despite its ramifications to the Company. This would result in a conflict between the two companies and the directors would be in a position to have to assist one at the expense of the other.

The sole officer and two directors of the Company beneficially own and will continue to own a majority of the Company's common stock and, as a result, can exercise control over shareholder and corporate actions.

The three directors (one of whom is the sole officer) of the Company own 57.7% of the Company's outstanding common stock. As such, they are able to control matters requiring approval by shareholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. A director is required to act in the best interest of the company and to make his best business judgments based on such best interests of the company in approving corporate actions. As a director, and when voting on matters under consideration by the board of directors, the directors have a duty to act in the best interests of the Company; there is no such required duty when acting as shareholders or voting on matters under consideration by shareholders.

The directors and executive officers all reside outside the United States which may inhibit the ability of investors to bring any legal action or to enforce or collect on any favorable judgement that in such case may be received.

All the directors and the executive officer of the Company reside outside of the United States which may compromise the ability of investors to enforce their legal rights or effect service of process upon directors or executive officer or enforce civil or criminal judgments of United States courts against the Company, its directors or executive officer. Likewise, other than the cash on hand, as of the date of the registration statement, the Company has no assets in the United States. In addition, the Company's licensed research facility is located outside the United States and the jurisdiction of the United States legal system. This may render any monetary penalty (whether civil or criminal in nature) obtained by any investor for any reason against the Company or any of its directors or executives difficult if not impossible to enforce.

As the Technology licensed by the Company is not protected by patent, the Company may find it difficult to protect it or additional developments based on the Technology and competitors or others may develop or copy similar technology.

The Technology licensed by the Company is not protected by a patent. There is no such thing as a world patent and the issuance of a patent in Australian does not necessarily prohibit others from using or developing the same technology. To protect its intellectual property, the Company will need to secure patent protection for the Technology under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and also lodge separate patent applications in countries that are not members of the PCT. Under the PCT, member states, which include the United States and Australia, may initially lodge one application and all member states will recognize this application as recording a "priority date" for the invention. The Company has leased Technology that is the subject of a provisional patent lodged in Australia and as Australia is a member of the PCT, the Company's leased intellectual property can be secured by the prosecution of a full patent application under the PCT process. Should the PCT process not be correctly prosecuted, the Company may fail to secure a patent for the Technology in all jurisdictions covered under the PCT and this could give rise to commercial harm. Likewise, if the Company becomes unable to fund the prosecution of the PCT process, or fund patent application process in non-member countries, the Company would fail to secure ongoing patent protection for the Technology and this could give rise to commercial harm. Moreover, to mitigate against the risk of circumvention of its intellectual property, the Company will need to ensure that all initial demonstrations of the technology are conducted on a private and confidential basis and that confidentiality agreements are entered into with organizations seeking to view and evaluate the Technology.

The Company is a development stage company and has a correspondingly small financial and accounting organization. Being a public company may strain the Company's resources, divert management’s attention and affect its ability to attract and retain qualified directors.

The Company is a development stage company with a newly formed and developing finance and accounting organization; the rigorous demands of being a public reporting company will require a large and experienced finance and accounting group. As a public company, the Company will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The requirements of these laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder entail significant accounting, legal and financial compliance costs, and have made, and will continue to make, some activities more difficult, time consuming or costly and may place significant strain on the Company's personnel, systems and resources.

The Securities Exchange Act requires, among other things, that the Company maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to establish the requisite disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight are required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

These rules and regulations may also make it difficult and expensive for the Company to obtain director and officer liability insurance. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate director and officer insurance, its ability to recruit and retain qualified officers and directors, especially those directors who may be deemed independent, will be significantly curtailed.

Government regulation could negatively impact the technology.

The Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine has been developed to comply and surpass environmental standards and regulations for air, water and noise as well as meet and surpass regulations and guidelines for fuel efficiency and consumption. However, unforeseen changes in these regulations and standards could have an impact on the business if any such changes were not able to be met by the Eco-Engine.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The company has an office in Sydney, Australia. On July 10, 2009, the Company also entered into a lease agreement with Premier Business Centers, under which the Company will lease approximately 165 square feet of office space located at 10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1600, Los Angeles, California 90024 at a monthly rate of $1050. The lease term is month-to-month having commenced on August 3, 2009.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not involved in any legal proceedings.

Item 4. (Removed and reserved)

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “MHYR”. There can be no assurance that a liquid market for our securities will ever develop. Transfer of our common stock may also be restricted under the securities or blue sky laws of various states and foreign jurisdictions. Consequently, investors may not be able to liquidate their investments and should be prepared to hold the common stock for an indefinite period of time.

The following table summarizes the high and low closing sales prices per share of the common stock for the periods indicated as reported on the OTCQB:

	High ($)		Low ($)

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011

1st Quarter (January 3 – March 31):		N/A		N/A

2rd Quarter (April 1 – June 30):		7		2.3

3nd Quarter (July 1 – September 30):		6.25		3.5

4th Quarter (October 3 – December 30):		4.99		3.1

Performance Graph

We are a “smaller reporting company” and as such, are not required to provide this information.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

The Company has sold the following securities within the past three years which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933:

Since inception in April 2009, the Company issued 10,250,000 shares of its common stock at par ($.0001) to sixty-six (66) initial stockholders for an aggregate of $1,025, pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering. Each of the transactions was a private transaction with a person or entity related to or personally known to the founder of the Company or one of its officers or shareholders. With the exception of Tiber Creek Corporation all of the issuances were to entities neither citizens nor residents of the United States. There was no public solicitation or advertisement.

Holders of Common Equity

On March 28, 2012, we had 10,250,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding to 115 holders of record, and the closing price of our common stock as quoted on the OTCQB was $3.00 per share. The number of record holders does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of banks, brokers, nominees or other fiduciaries.

Dividends

We have not paid cash dividends on any class of common equity since formation.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

We are a “smaller reporting company” and, as such, are not required to provide this information.

Statements of Operations Data

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The Company was formed on April 20, 2009 and is a development stage company with no operating revenues or profits. The Company has developed three prototypes of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine which will be tested for performance validation by government agencies and academic institutions. After validation of the tests, the Company will market the Eco-Engine to manufacturers in the United States, Australia and around the World.

Expenses and Capital Expenditures

Other than the development agreement for use of the testing facilities at Manthey Holdings, the Company has not incurred any large expenses nor made or planned any large capital expenditures.

Results of Operations

For the year ending December 31, 2011 and for the year ending December 31, 2010:

The Company was incorporated in April 2009 to primarily engage business in the development and commercialization of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine and related Technologies. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had not generated any revenue.

The Company intends to continue research and development of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine during 2012. The Company received the updated prototype of the Eco-Engine in the fourth quarter of 2010 and testing is being conducted on the engine at present. Throughout 2012 the Company intends to begin selective and proprietary marketing of the engine to potential end users and manufacturers and to possible interested joint venture partners. The Company incurred $259,645 and $406,678 operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which primarily consisted of research and development expense of $139,000 and $360,000, professional services of $93,968 and $33,488 and rent expense of $13,687 and $12,596, respectively. In relation to professional services in 2010 to 2011, the increase in 2011 relates to the commencement of recurring quarterly fees for accounting and auditing services associated with the filing of Quarterly Reports, and also recurring stock transfer agent fees related to the company’s stock quotation on the OTCBB. The period also included a one-off payment of $11,000 for legal consulting work. The research and development expenses were incurred pursuant to the amended Development Agreement with Manthey Holdings on November 6, 2009, which revises the commencement date of development service fee payment from July 1, 2009 to November 20, 2009. Research and development expenses of $139,000 incurred pursuant to the Development Agreement in 2011 were not paid and were recorded as accrued expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following summarizes the key component of the company’s cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

Net cash used in operating activities was $115,145 and $47,728 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which were mainly driven by net losses in the amount of $259,645 and $406,678, partially offset by increases in accrued expense and other liabilities in the amount of $144,500 and $358,950, respectively. Increases in accrued expense and other liabilities were primarily to record unpaid research and development expenses to Manthey Holdings Pty Ltd pursuant to the Development Agreement.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $123,310 and $44,842 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During its initial organization, the Company received $38,950 in advances from Manthey Redmond (Aust) not pursuant to the Investment Agreement, and is a loan, interest free, which must be repaid. No formal loan terms were established, but the Company intends to repay the loan once in a position to do so. In November 2009, March 2010, May 2010, January 2011, March 2011, June 2011, August 2011, September 2011, October 2011 and December 2011 the Company received $39,925, $955, $43,887, $29,596, $19,950, $20,000, $100, $4,986, $33,907 and $14,771 of capital injection, respectively from Manthey Redmond (Aust) pursuant to the Investment Agreement, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management’s Plan to Continue as a Going Concern

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to obtain such resources for the Company include (1) obtaining capital from the sale of its securities, (2) the sublicensing and sale of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine, (3) additional capital injection from Manthey Redmond (Aust) pertaining to the Investment Agreement, and (4) short-term borrowings from shareholders or related party when needed. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations.

Factors Affecting our Business and Prospects

See Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

In the opinion of management, with the exception of exposure to current turmoil in the capital markets, we are not subject to any significant market risk exposure.

Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2011

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Manthey Redmond Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Manthey Redmond Corporation (the “Company”) (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from inception (April 20, 2009) to December 31, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial positions of Manthey Redmond Corporation as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and for the period from inception (April 20, 2009) to December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 1 of the financial statements, the Company has been in the development stage since its inception (April 20, 2009) and continues to incur expenses. The Company’s viability is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and the success of its future operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan in regard to these matters is also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/KCCW Accountancy Corp.

Diamond Bar, California

March 28, 2012

F-1

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Assets

Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,734		$	1,569

Fixed Assets		-			-

Other Assets		1,050			1,050

Total Assets	$	10,784		$	2,619

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Current Liabilities
Accrued expense	$	507,727		$	363,228
Other payable - related party		38,950			38,950
Total Current Liabilities		546,677			402,178

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock - $.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares
issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock - $.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized,
10,250,000 shares issued and outstanding		1,025			1,025
Additional paid-in capital		208,077			84,767
Accumulated deficit		(744,996	)		(485,351	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		(535,894	)		(399,559	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	10,784		$	2,619

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	For The Year Ended December 31, 2011			For The Year Ended December 31, 2010			From April 20, 2009 (Inception) through December 31, 2011

Net revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-

Operating expenses
Research and development expense		139,000			360,000			540,000
Advertising and promotion		1,417			-			1,417
Professional services		93,968			33,488			158,960
Rent expense		13,687			12,596			31,700
Other		11,573			594			12,919
Total operating expenses		259,645			406,678			744,996

Net loss	$	(259,645	)	$	(406,678	)	$	(744,996	)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.08	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		10,250,000			10,250,000			9,817,199

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

	Common Stock				Additional					Total
					Paid-in		Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Equity

Balance at April 20, 2009 (Inception)		-	$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-

Issuance of common stock		10,250,000		1,025		-		-			1,025

Net loss for the period ended December 31, 2009		-		-		-		(78,672	)		(78,672	)

Capital contribution		-		-		39,925		-			39,925

Balance at December 31, 2009		10,250,000		1,025		39,925		(78,672	)		(37,722	)

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010		-		-		-		(406,678	)		(406,678	)

Capital contribution		-		-		44,842		-			44,842

Balance at December 31, 2010		10,250,000		1,025		84,767		(485,351	)		(399,559	)

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011		-		-		-		(259,645	)		(259,645	)

Capital contribution		-		-		123,310		-			123,310

Balance at December 31, 2011		10,250,000	$	1,025	$	208,077	$	(744,996	)	$	(535,894	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For The Year Ended December 31, 2011			For The Year Ended December 31, 2010			From April 20, 2009 (Inception) through December 31, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(259,645	)	$	(406,678	)	$	(744,996	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Other assets		-			-			(1,050	)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accrued expense and other liabilities		144,500			358,950			507,727
Net cash used in operating activities		(115,146	)		(47,728	)		(238,319	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings from related party		-			-			38,950
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			-			1,025
Additional capital contributions		123,310			44,842			208,077
Net cash provided by financing activities		123,310			44,842			248,052

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS		8,164			(2,886	)		9,733

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE		1,569			4,455			-

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE	$	9,733		$	1,569		$	9,733

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income tax paid	$	-		$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Manthey Redmond Corporation (the “Company”) is a development stage company incorporated in the State of Delaware in April, 2009 to research, design, manufacture, and market technology now leased and to be developed by the Company. Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd., an Australian corporation ("Manthey Redmond (Aust)"), is the patent owner and developer of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine, a fuel-efficient, lightweight, low-emission, multi-fuel engine smaller and less expensive than conventional internal combustion engines initially targeted for marine applications.

In May, 2009, the Company entered into a Patent Licensing Agreements with Manthey Redmond (Aust) for the development, manufacture, use, sale, and sublicense of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine and all developed technology and products related to the technology patent (the "Technology") for a royalty payment to Manthey Redmond (Aust) of 5% of annual gross profits. Pursuant to an Investment Agreement entered into with the Company in May, 2009, Manthey Redmond (Aust) agreed to fund to the Company monthly payments of $40,000 up to a maximum of $4,200,000 in aggregate to assist the Company in commercializing products based on the Technology. All three of the Company’s directors serve as the directors of Manthey Redmond (Aust).

In May, 2009, the Company entered into a Development Agreement with Manthey Holdings Pty Limited (“Manthey Holdings”) for the exclusive use of Manthey Holdings' engineering facility and employees for research and development of and related to the Technology at a monthly fee of $30,000 up to a maximum of $540,000 in aggregate. In November, 2009, the Development Agreement was amended to remove the exclusivity of the use of Manthey Holdings’ engineering facility and employees, and to defer the commencement date of the agreement and first payment to November 20, 2009. The Company’s president/director is the sole shareholder and director of Manthey Holdings which serves as the trustee of the Manthey Holdings Trust. The Company’s president/director is also the beneficiary of the Manthey Holdings Trust and may be deemed the beneficial owner of the 3,040,000 shares, or 29.6% of the Company’s common stock owned by the Manthey Holdings Trust. On November 6, 2009, the agreement was amended to revise the commencement date of payment from July 1, 2009 to November 20, 2009. The maximum amount of $540,000 has been reached in the second quarter of 2011 under the development agreement, $502,227 of which has not been paid. It was recorded as accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011.

On June 23, 2011, the Company set up a wholly owned subsidiary MRC Global Limited in Hong Kong.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

Management’s Plan to Continue as a Going Concern

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to obtain such resources for the Company include (1) obtaining capital from the sale of its securities, (2) the sublicensing and sale of the Manthey Redmond Eco-Engine, (3) additional capital injection from Manthey Redmond (Aust) pertaining to the Investment Agreement (see Note 3), and (3) short-term borrowings from shareholders or related party when needed. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

F-6

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION
(A Development Stage Company)
(NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Fiscal Year

The fiscal year of the Company is January 1 to December 31.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Manthey Redmond Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include unrestricted deposits and short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less. The Company minimizes its risk associated with cash and cash equivalents by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the balances did not exceed the federally insured limit. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, cash and cash equivalent amounted to $9,734 and $1,569, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize product revenue when the following fundamental criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) our price to the customer is fixed or determinable and (iv) collection of the resulting accounts receivable is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue for product sales upon transfer of title to the customer. Customer purchase orders and/or contracts are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and the completion of any customer acceptance requirements, when applicable, are used to verify product delivery or that services have been rendered. We assess whether a price is fixed or determinable based upon the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We will record reductions to revenue for estimated product returns and pricing adjustments in the same period that the related revenue is recorded. These estimates will be based on historical sales returns when available, analysis of credit memo data, and other factors known at the time.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-7

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION
(A Development Stage Company)
(NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Net Loss per Common Share

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share reflects the potential dilution of securities by including common stock equivalents, such as stock options, stock warrants and convertible preferred stock, in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for a period, if dilutive. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no potentially dilutive securities.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has adopted all recently issued accounting pronouncements. The adoption of the accounting pronouncements, including those not yet effective, is not anticipated to have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Advances from Related Party

On June 3, 2009, the Company received $38,950 of advances from Manthey Redmond (Aust), all directors of which are also directors of the Company. The advances were non-interest bearing loan to be repaid at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, advances from related party remained at $38,950.

Patent Licensing Agreement

On May 1, 2009, the Company entered into a Patent Licensing Agreement with Manthey Redmond (Aust). Manthey Redmond is the owner, developer and patent applicant of the Eco-Engine and all related technology (the "Technology") developed and to be developed. Pursuant to the agreement, Manthey Redmond (Aust) has granted to the Company, a license to develop, manufacture, have manufactured, use and sell or supply the Technology in return for a royalty fee equal to 5% of the Company's gross profits earned as a result of the license agreement. The Company has the right to sublicense its rights under the agreement and is entitled to information and use of any inventions or improvements on the Technology made by Manthey Redmond (Aust) without additional charge. Manthey Redmond (Aust) will apply for valid patents pursuant to each invention or improvements on the Technology. The agreement may be terminated at the option of Manthey Redmond (Aust) in the event that the Company becomes insolvent, or seeks protection from its creditors under any United States federal or state bankruptcy act or if an outside administrator or controller is voluntary or involuntarily appointed to control the Company. The agreement is subject to and governed by the law of Queensland, Australia.

Investment Agreement

On May 1, 2009, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with Manthey Redmond (Aust) by which Manthey Redmond (Aust) has agreed to invest a non-refundable amount of $40,000 per month beginning July 1, 2009, aggregating $4,200,000 to assist the Company in commercializing products based on the Technology. Manthey Redmond (Aust) may terminate this agreement in the event that the Patent Licensing Agreement is terminated. The agreement is subject to and governed by the law of Queensland, Australia.

F-8

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION
(A Development Stage Company)
(NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In November 2009, March 2010, May 2010, January 2011, March 2011, June 2011, August 2011, September 2011, October 2011 and December 2011 the Company received $39,925, $955, $43,887, $29,596, $19,950, $20,000, $100, $4,986, $33,907 and $14,771 of capital injection, respectively from Manthey Redmond (Aust) pursuant to the Investment Agreement, which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

Development Agreement

On May 1, 2009 the Company entered into a Development Agreement with Manthey Holdings by which, commencing July 1, 2009, Manthey Holdings will provide exclusive use of its engineering facility and employees for the purpose of research and development related to the Technology for which the Company will pay Manthey Holdings $30,000 per month beginning July 1, 2009 up to a maximum of $540,000 at which time the agreement shall terminate. On November 6, 2009 the Company entered into an amended Development Agreement dated May 1, 2009 with Manthey Holdings. The amended agreement removed the exclusivity of the use of Manthey Holdings’ engineering facility and employees, and deferred the commencement date of the agreement and first payment to November 20, 2009. Our president/director is the sole shareholder and director of Manthey Holdings which serves as the trustee of the Manthey Holdings Trust. Our president/director is also the beneficiary of the Manthey Holdings Trust and may be deemed the beneficial owner of the 3,040,000 shares, or 29.6% of the Company’s common stock owned by the Manthey Holdings Trust.

On November 6, 2009, the agreement was amended to revise the commencement date of payment from July 1, 2009 to November 20, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred $140,050 of service fees pursuant to the amended agreement with Manthey Holdings and recorded in accrued expense. As of June 30, 2011, the maximum amount of $540,000 has been reached under the development agreement, $502,227 of which has not been paid. It was recorded as accrued expenses on the balance sheet.

The agreement will also terminate in the event that the Patent Licensing Agreement is terminated. Manthey Holdings has agreed to build and test prototypes based on the Technology at its research facility. The agreement is subject to and governed by the law of Queensland, Australia.

NOTE 5 - ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

	December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
Accrued research and development expense – related party	$	502,227	$	362,177
Accrued professional fees		5,500		-
Accrued rent		-		1,050
Total	$	507,727	$	363,227

F-9

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION
(A Development Stage Company)
(NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $.0001 and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $.0001. On June 1, 2009, the Company issued 10,250,000 shares of common stock at par value to its sixty-six (66) initial stockholders.

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted on by the stockholders. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors in its discretion from funds legally available therefore. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock are entitled to share pro rata all assets remaining after payment in full of all liabilities. Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase the Company’s common stock. There are no conversion or redemption rights or sinking fund provisions with respect to the common stock.

In November 2009, March 2010, May 2010, January 2011, March 2011, June 2011, August 2011, September 2011, October 2011 and December 2011, the Company received $39,925, $955, $43,887, $29,596, $19,950, $20,000, $100, $4,986, $33,907 and $14,771 of capital injection, respectively from Manthey Redmond (Aust) pursuant to the Investment Agreement (see Note 4), which was recorded as additional paid-in capital.

NOTE 7 – OPERATING LEASES

On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Premier Business Centers, under which the Company will lease approximately 165 square feet of office space located at 10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1600, Los Angeles, California 90024 at a monthly rate of $1,050. The lease term is month-to-month commencing August 3, 2009 with security deposit of one-month rent of $1,050 recorded as Other Assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.

F-10

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2011.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. The Company is continuously seeking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its operations and of its internal controls. This results in refinements to processes throughout the year. We continue to enhance the design and documentation of our internal control processes to ensure suitable controls over our financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following table sets forth information regarding the members of the company’s board of directors and its executive officers:

			Date of Directorship
Name	Age	Position	commencement

Steven Charles Manthey	50	President/CEO	April 24, 2009

Timothy John Eric Redmond	47	Director	April 24, 2009

Geoffrey Redmond	53	Director	April 24, 2009

The number of directors to compose the company’s Board of Directors is not fewer than one nor more than five. Directors do not receive any compensation. Directors may be shareholders of the company.

Steven Charles Manthey is the president and a director of the Company. Mr Manthey, as the inventor of the licensed Technology, works exclusively on the development of the Technology in addition to discharging his administrative duties as President. Mr Manthey currently leads a team of five CNC machinists who design and manufacture all engine components under Mr Manthey’s direction. Additional employees assist Mr Manthey during field testing of prototypes. In addition to the licensed Technology, Mr Manthey is also the inventor of an axial piston rotary engine (U.S. Patent Number 6,155,214) that he designed, manufactured and ultimately assigned ownership of in 1999. Since the formation of the Manthey Redmond Joint Venture in October 2007, Mr Manthey’s research and development has focused exclusively on the licensed Technology.

Geoffrey Redmond is managing director of the Redmond Group. The Redmond Group owns and operates various hotels that incorporate gaming facilities in Sydney, Australia. Since October 2007 the Group has funded all development of the licensed Technology. To monitor progress of the development of the Technology, Mr Redmond visits the development facility at least once a month and also speaks regularly with Mr Manthey. Board meetings for the Company are often scheduled to coincide with Mr Redmond’s attendance at the facility. Mr Redmond has also travelled to the United States on two occasions to meet with the Company’s attorney’s and business advisors.

Timothy John Eric Redmond is the brother of Geoffrey Redmond and acts as Chief Financial Officer of the Redmond Group. Mr Redmond also visits the development facility at least once a month to monitor progress of development and attend Board meetings when scheduled. Mr Redmond has also travelled to the United States on two occasions to meet with the Company’s attorney’s and business advisors.”

The directors serve until the annual meeting of the shareholders and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified or until death, resignation, removal or disqualification.

The company’s by-laws provide that the number of directors to serve on the Board of Directors may be established, from time to time, by action of the Board of Directors. Vacancies in the existing Board are filled by a majority vote of the remaining directors on the Board. The company’s executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the Board.

Committees and Terms

The Board of Directors has not established any committees.

The Board has not resolved to set a date for its annual meeting of shareholders.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Steven Charles Manthey is the sole officer of the Company. Mr Manthey has not received any remuneration from the company but is the sole shareholder and director of Manthey Holdings Pty Ltd and is the beneficiary of the Manthey Holdings Trust and may be deemed the beneficial owner of the 3,040,000 shares of the company’s common stock owned by it. Pursuant to the development agreement, Manthey Holdings Pty Ltd was entitled to $30,000 per month from the Company for use of its testing and research facilities, up to a maximum of $540,000 in aggregate. The maximum amount of $540,000 has been reached in the second quarter of 2011 with $502,227 being unpaid and as recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011.

Anticipated officer and director remuneration

Although not presently offered, the company anticipates that its officers and directors may be provided with a group health, vision and dental insurance program along with director and officer indemnity insurance.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth information as of the date of this Form 10K regarding the beneficial ownership of the company’s common stock by each of its executive officers and directors, individually and as a group and by each person who beneficially owns in excess of five percent of the common stock after giving effect to any exercise of warrants or options held by that person.

Position	Number of shares of common stock			Percentage of Class

Steven Charles Manthey, president/director		3,040,000	(2)		29.6	%

Timothy John Eric Redmond, Director		1,911,116	(3)		18.6	%

Geoffrey Redmond, Director		2,201,116	(4)		21.5	%

North American Motors		560,000	(5)		5.5	%

(1) The total number of outstanding shares of common stock as of March 30, 2012 is 10,250,000.

(2) Manthey Holdings Trust owns 3,040,000 shares; Manthey Holdings Pty Ltd serves as the trustee for the Manthey Holdings Trust. Steven Charles Manthey is the sole shareholder and director of Manthey Holdings Pty Ltd and is the beneficiary of the Manthey Holdings Trust and may be deemed the beneficial owner of the shares owned by it.

(3) The Redmond Family Investment Trust owns 1,911,116 shares; Redmond Family Holdings Pty Ltd serves as the trustee for the Redmond Family Investment Trust. Timothy John Eric Redmond and Geoffrey Redmond are the only shareholders and directors of Redmond Family Holdings Pty Ltd and are the sole beneficiaries of such trust and may therefore be deemed to be the beneficial owner of those shares.

(4) The Redmond Family Investment Trust owns 1,911,116 shares; Redmond Family Holdings Pty Ltd serves as the trustee for the Redmond Family Investment Trust. Timothy John Eric Redmond and Geoffrey Redmond are the only shareholders and directors of Redmond Family Holdings Pty Ltd and are the sole beneficiaries of such trust and may therefore be deemed to be the beneficial owner of those shares. Alison Redmond, wife of Geoffrey Redmond, owns 290,000 shares of the company’s common stock.

(5) NAM Trust No. 1 owns 560,000 shares; North American Motors Pty Ltd serves as the trustee for the NAM Trust No. 1. Steven Charles Manthey is the sole director and a beneficiary under the NAM Trust No. 1 and may therefore be deemed to be the beneficial owner of those shares.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Timothy John Eric Redmond and Geoffrey Redmond are brothers and are the sole directors and shareholders of Redmond Family Holdings Pty Ltd which owns 360 shares (40%) of the 900 outstanding shares of Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd. In 2007, Redmond Family Holdings Pty Ltd (or its predecessor in title) agreed to invest $50,000 monthly in Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd for research and development of the Manthey Redmond Eco-engine. Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd has entered into an investment agreement with the company to invest $40,000 monthly to continue research, development, commercialization of the Eco-engine.

Steven Charles Manthey is the sole director and shareholder of Manthey Holdings Pty Ltd which owns 540 shares (60%) of the 900 shares of Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd. The company has entered into an agreement with Manthey Holdings Pty Ltd for use of its research facility, staff and prototype testing for a monthly fee of $30,000.

During its initial organization, the company received $38,950 in advances from Manthey Redmond (Aust) Pty Ltd not pursuant to the Investment Agreement and, as such, is a loan interest free, which, unlike the funds received from the Investment Agreement, must be repaid. No formal loan terms were established but the company intends to repay the loan as soon as possible. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, advances from related party remained at $38,950.

On November 6, 2009, the agreement was amended to revise the commencement date of payment from July 1, 2009 to November 20, 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred $140,050 of service fees pursuant to the amended agreement with Manthey Holdings and recorded in accrued expense. The maximum amount of $540,000 has been reached since the second quarter of 2011 under the development agreement, $502,227 of which has not been paid. It was recorded as accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Public Accounting Fees

The following chart sets forth public accounting fees paid and payable to KCCW Accountancy Corp. (“KCCW”) during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:

	2011		2010
Audit Fees	$	17,000	$	16,000
Audit-Related Fees	$	-	$	-
Tax Fees	$	-	$	-
All Other Fees	$	-	$	-

Audit fees were for professional services rendered by KCCW for the audit of our annual financial statements on Forms 10-K and the review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q, and services that are normally provided by KCCW in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for that fiscal year.

Audit related fees consist of services by KCCW that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under Audit Fees. This category includes accounting consultations on transaction and proposed transaction related matters. We incurred these fees in connection with registration statements, financing, and acquisition transaction.

KCCW did not bill any other fees for services rendered to us during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 for assurance and related services in connection with the audit or review of our financial statements.

Pre-Approval of Services

The Company does not currently have an audit committee serving and as a result its board of directors performs the duties of an audit committee. The board of directors will evaluate and approve in advance, the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before the auditor renders audit and non-audit services. The Company does not rely on pre-approval policies and procedures.

Audit of Financial Statements

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, KCCW was our principal auditor and no work was performed by persons outside of KCCW.

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules (a)

(1) Financial Statements

The Financial Statements required by Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K are set forth above.

Other schedules have been omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information where material is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Manthey Redmond Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MANTHEY REDMOND CORPORATION

By: /s/ Steven Charles Manthey Date: December 10, 2012

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following persons on behalf of Manthey Redmond Corporation and in the capacities and on the date indicated have duly signed this report below.

/s/Steven Charles Manthey

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

/s/ Geoffrey Redmond,

Director

/s/ Timothy John Eric Redmond,

Director

MANTHEY REDMOND Corp 10-K/A