Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

6 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the SEC to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2014.

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Development Stage Company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and developing revenue generating opportunities through its planned principal operations. In the latter half of 2011 the Company’s principal sales operations began. The Company recognized revenues initially in April/May 2012. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Development Stage Enterprise

The Company is a development stage enterprise as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and developing revenue generating opportunities through its planned principal operations. In the latter half of 2011 the Company’s principal sales operations began. The Company recognized revenues initially in April/May 2012. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period’s data to conform to the current period’s presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the reported net loss accumulated during the development stage.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

The Company’s significant estimates and assumptions include the fair value of financial instruments; income tax rate, income tax provision, deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets, and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

Fair Value of Financial Instrument

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and average maturities, the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations approximate their fair value.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Management’s estimate regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets in future years is based upon the weight of the available evidence that it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that a portion or all of the deferred tax assets would not be realized in future years. A valuation allowance is recognized, if based on the weight of available evidence, if it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized.

The Company recognizes in its financial statements the financial effect of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any appeals or litigation processes, based upon the technical merits of the position. Tax positions related to the Company’s federal and state requirements have been reviewed, and management is of the opinion that material positions taken by the Company would more likely than not be sustained by examination. Accordingly, the Company had no uncertain tax positions that qualify for either recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s tax years 2010 and thereafter remain subject to examination for federal and state tax purposes.

Fiscal Year-End

In May 2013 the Company changed its fiscal year end from May 31 to December 31.

Fiscal Year-End

In May 2013 the Company changed its fiscal year end from May 31 to December 31.

Liquidity

Historically, the Company has been dependent on debt and equity raised from individual investors to sustain its operations. The Company’s product has not sold a sufficient number of units to generate significant revenue. The Company has operated as a development stage enterprise since inception with total operating expenses incurred of $15,240,420 and an overall net loss of ($15,583,087) accumulated through June 30, 2014. Net revenues recorded from inception (January 31, 2006) through June 30, 2014 are $933,755. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s December 31, 2013, fiscal year end audited financial statements contain a “going concern” opinion by our auditors. Based on the Company’s recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows from operating activities, and a working capital deficit and total stockholders’ deficit at December 31, 2013, the auditor’s opinion expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management plans include seeking additional equity investments from private individuals as well as fund managers with a stated focus of investing in small public companies like the Company, private equity type firms, and venture capital firms. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Liquidity

Historically, the Company has been dependent on debt and equity raised from individual investors to sustain its operations. The Company’s product has not sold sufficient number of units to generate significant revenue. The Company has operated as a development stage enterprise since inception with total operating expenses incurred of $13,764,476 and an overall net loss of ($13,145,722) accumulated through December 31, 2013. Net revenues recorded from inception (January 31, 2006) through December 31, 2013 are $673,762. These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s December 31, 2013, fiscal year end audited financial statements contain a “going concern” opinion by our auditors. Based on the Company’s recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows from operating activities, and a working capital deficit and total stockholders’ deficit at December 31, 2013, the auditor’s opinion expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management plans include seeking additional equity investments from private individuals as well as fund managers with a stated focus of investing in small public companies like the Company, private equity type firms, and venture capital firms. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

Management has not provided an allowance for uncollectible receivables. All receivables considered doubtful have been charged to current operations and it is management’s opinion that no additional significant amounts are doubtful of collection based on prior experience, review of accounts and other pertinent factors.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized, while minor replacements, maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets ranging from 3 to 7 years.

Inventory

Inventory consists of parts, supplies, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market (net realizable value).

Inventory

Inventory consists of parts and supplies. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment whenever triggering events or changes in circumstances occur, indicating that the carrying amount of any asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If triggering events or changes in circumstances occur, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. During 2012, a review of the balance of the intangible assets concluded these assets were obsolete and had no future value. Therefore, the Company charged the remaining unamortized balance, $14,893, to expense. There were $41,777 of impairment losses associated with its patents and trademarks for the period from inception (January 30, 2006) to December 31, 2013.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include: (a) affiliates of the Company; (b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825-10-15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; (c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; (d) principal owners of the Company; (e) management of the Company; (f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and (g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: (a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; (b) description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; (c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and (d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitment and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

Commitments and Contingencies

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue Recognition

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was $9,118 and $1,754 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The amounts expensed for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 were $11,455 and $5,052, respectively. The amounts charged for the period from inception (January 30, 2006) to June 30, 2014 were $113,382.

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was $21,065 and $52,659 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The amounts charged for the period from inception (January 30, 2006) to December 31, 2013 were $101,866.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in operating expenses. The research and development expenses were $24,059 and $17,104 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The amounts charged for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 were $27,689 and $23,833, respectively. The amounts charged for the period from inception (January 30, 2006) to June 30, 2014 amounted to $1,369,835.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in operating expenses. The research and development expenses were $131,861 and $240,829 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The amounts charged for the period from inception (January 30, 2006) to December 31, 2013 amounted to $1,342,146.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company recognizes in its statement of operations the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments. The costs were based on their fair values at the time of the grant. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted to employees. Stock based compensation recognized for the period from inception (January 30, 2006) to June 30, 2014 was $2,192,813. The stock based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0 and $147,461, respectively. The stock based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 was $0 and $147,461, respectively.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company recognizes in its statement of operations the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments. The costs were based on their fair values at the time of the grant. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted to employees. Stock based compensation recognized for the period from inception (January 30, 2006) to December 31, 2013 was $2,192,813. The stock based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $476,325 and $28,773, respectively.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangements, stock options or warrants.

There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013.

There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

eFleets Corp S-1/A