UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark one)

x	Quarterly Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

o	Transition Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

	For the transition period from ______________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-54770

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	45-0704149
(State of incorporation)	(IRS Employer ID Number)

1137 Highway 80 East, Post Office Box 1218, Tombstone, AZ 86638

(Address of principal executive offices)

(520) 457-9404

(Issuer’s telephone number)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): YES o NO x

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity as of the latest practicable date: September 20, 2017: 336,300,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2017

Table of Contents

	Page
Part I - Financial Information

Item 1 - Financial Statements	3

Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	19

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures	19

Part II - Other Information

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	19

Item 1A - Risk Factors	19

Item 2 - Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	19

Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities	19

Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures	19

Item 5 - Other Information	19

Item 6 - Exhibits	20

Signatures	20

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1 - Financial Statements

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
	June 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016
ASSETS

Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	—

Total Current Assets		—			—

Other Assets
Prepaid capital commitment fee		90,000			—
Investment in Tombstone Development Corp.		1,000			—
Investment in mining leases and claims		5,000,526			—

Total Assets	$	5,091,526		$	—

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable - Trade	$	31,429		$	12,236
Accrued expenses to former management		59,846			59,846
Accrued interest payable		167,081			60,888
Note payable to
Mining leases/claims		1,460,000			—
Financial services firm		90,000			—
Stockholder		820,371			820,371
Management services company		26,849			—

Total Liabilities		2,655,576			953,341

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value
25,000,000 shares authorized.
None issued and outstanding.		—			—
Common stock - $0.001 par value.
500,000,000 shares authorized.
336,300,000 and 50,720,000 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively		336,300			51,720
284,500,000 shares issued in escrow at December 31, 2016		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		62,748,890			59,552,470
Accumulated deficit		(60,649,240	)		(60,557,531	)

Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		2,435,950			(953,341	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	5,091,526		$	—

The financial information presented herein has been prepared by management

without audit by independent certified public accountants.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

Six and Three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

(Unaudited)

	Six months			Six months			Three months			Three months
	ended			ended			ended			ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016

Revenues	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Cost of Sales		—			—			—			—

Gross Profit		—			—			—			—

Operating expenses
Professional fees		40,941			67,627			10,936			49,896
General and administrative costs		5,100			—			325			—

Total operating expenses		46,041			67,627			11,261			49,896

Loss from operations		(46,041	)		(67,627	)		(11,261	)		(49,896	)

Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(45,668	)		(43,362	)		(24,971	)		(19,475	)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(91,709	)		(110,989	)		(36,232	)		(69,371	)

Provision for income taxes		—			—			—			—

Net loss		(91,709	)		(110,989	)		(36,232	)		(69,371	)

Other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—

Comprehensive loss	$	(91,709	)	$	(110,989	)	$	(36,232	)	$	(69,371	)

Loss per weighted-average share of common stock outstanding,
computed on net loss -basic and fully diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding -
basic and fully diluted		336,300,000			50,220,000			336,300,000			50,220,000

The financial information presented herein has been prepared by management

without audit by independent certified public accountants.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

(Unaudited)

	Six months			Six months
	ended			ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2017			2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss) for the period	$	(91,709	)	$	(110,989	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		—			—
Note payable for restructuring fees		—			21,140
Increase (Decrease) in
Accounts payable		19,193			6,493
Accrued expenses		45,667			43,362
Deferred revenues		—			—

Net cash used in operating activities		(26,849	)		(39,994	)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities		—			—

Net cash used in investing activities		—			—

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash received from notes payable
to stockholders and management services company		26,849			39,994

Net cash provided by financing activities		26,849			39,994

Increase (Decrease) in Cash		—			—

Cash at beginning of period		—			—

Cash at end of period	$	—		$	—

Supplemental Disclosure of Interest and Income Taxes Paid
Interest paid during the period	$	—		$	—
Income taxes paid during the period	$	—		$	—

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Acquisition of Tombstone Development Company and various mining claims
and leases with the assumption of a certain note payable, issuance of a note
payable and issuance of common stock	$	5,001,526		$	—
Payment of a capital commitment fee with a note payable	$	90,000		$	—

The financial information presented herein has been prepared by management

without audit by independent certified public accountants.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note A ‑ Background and Description of Business

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. (“Company” or “Med‑Cannabis Pharma”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on February 23, 2011. The Company was originally incorporated as SW China Imports, Inc. on February 23, 2011 in the State of Nevada. The Company’s initial business plan was to import high‑end handmade lace wigs, hairpieces, and other beauty supplies and accessories manufactured overseas into the United States. In June 2014, the Company changed its name to Med‑Cannabis Pharma, Inc. and implemented a new business plan to enter into the retail sale of medical and personal use marijuana, where allowable. In October 2015, the Company changed its name to MCPI, Inc. In March 2017, the Company, in anticipation of consummating a proposed asset acquisition transaction, changed its name to Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Effective March 31, 2016, the Company ceased activities in all of its subsidiaries and disposed of Med-Pharma Management, Inc. and High Desert MMJ, Inc. Prior thereto, the Company’s subsidiaries were Medical Management Systems, Inc., an Oregon corporation engaged in providing back-office and support services to marijuana dispensaries in the State of Oregon; Med‑Pharma Management, Inc., a Washington State corporation which was formed to own, manage or provide back-office and support services to marijuana dispensaries in Washington State; and High Desert MMJ, Inc. an Oregon corporation, which is a 99.0% partner in Emerald Mountain Organics, an Oregon joint venture, formed to facilitate the development and growing of medical marijuana plants for wholesale distribution to licenced dispensaries in the State of Oregon.

As of December 31, 2015, Medical Management Systems, Inc. held a Management Contract for three marijuana dispensaries located in Newport, Bend and Cottage Grove, Oregon; which are owned by a company controlled by a related party. This Management Contract was terminated by the consent of both parties, effective March 31, 2016. Med-Pharma only conducted introductory due diligence efforts in the State of Washington and, currently, had abandoned all activities in the State of Washington. Emerald Mountain Organics had, as of September 30,2015, established an early-phase growing operation and has generated nominal sales.

During the first 10 days of October 2015, the Company’s subsidiary, High Desert MMJ, Inc., learned that the 1.0% minority partner in the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture had absconded with all of the assets of the joint venture. Efforts to locate and recover either the individuals representing said 1.0% minority partner or the said absconded assets were unsuccessful. Accordingly, effective October 10, 2015, High Desert MMJ, Inc. abandoned the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture and wrote off said investment. The cumulative start-up losses in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture, through the date of abandonment were approximately $53,000 and the Company recognized a loss on the stolen assets of approximately $51,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2015.

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Settlement, General and Mutual Release of Claims and Assignment of Interest Transfer Agreement (Settlement Agreement) with its majority shareholder and a related party. The Settlement Agreement relates to the Company’s management of three medical marijuana dispensaries (Stores) located in Oregon, which are owned by Bendor Investments, Ltd. (Bendor), whose sole shareholder is Charles Stidham. The Company owes Mr. Stidham approximately $1,100,000, including accrued interest, as of the date of the Settlement Agreement.

The Company asserted a claim for management fees of approximately $80,000 and reimbursement of monies advanced to support the operations of the Stores totaling approximately $343,000 for the services of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Medical Management Systems, Inc. (MMS), in managing the Stores. Bendor disputed this claim. To resolve the dispute, the parties agreed to forgive the accrued management fees and to offset the approximately $343,000 due from Bendor against the approximately $1,100,000 owed to Mr. Stidham with the Company releasing any and all interests it may have had in the Stores and MMS. Additionally, the Company agreed to assign a trademark to Mr. Stidham as well as executing a new Note in the principal sum of $752,694.19.

On November 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement) with Armada Mining, Inc. of Tombstone, Arizona, an Arizona corporation (Armada). Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will issue 284,580,000 shares of its common stock to Armada, its affiliates, related entities and other common parties in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the Tombstone Mining District of Arizona. The Company will acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. Subject to the completion of due diligence, acquisition of adequate financing and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals, by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further development.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note A ‑ Background and Description of Business - continued

Upon completion of the terms of the Agreement, Armada will own approximately 85% of the Company’s post‑transaction issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Armada has represented to the Company that it anticipates exchanging a portion of these shares with their existing shareholders; using a portion to satisfy existing obligations to related parties and others; and using a portion to finance other Armada operations. The Agreement anticipates that Company, post-transaction, will have new Board of Directors that will, in turn, appoint new management for the Company. Additionally, the Company and Armada have facilitated a change in the Company’s corporate name to better reflect the nature and focus of the Company’s proposed ongoing and future business interests. This transaction closed on June 27, 2017.

Note B ‑ Preparation of Financial Statements

The Company follows the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and has elected a year‑end of December 31.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company’s system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.

For segment reporting purposes, the Company operated in only one industry segment during the periods represented in the accompanying financial statements and makes all operating decisions and allocates resources based on the best benefit to the Company as a whole.

During interim periods, the Company follows the accounting policies set forth in its annual audited financial statements filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission on its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The information presented within these interim financial statements may not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the users of financial information provided for interim periods should refer to the annual financial information and footnotes when reviewing the interim financial results presented herein.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim financial statements, prepared in accordance with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s instructions for Form 10-Q, are unaudited and contain all material adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective interim periods presented. The current period results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results which ultimately will be reported for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements, as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively and as appropriate, contain the accounts of Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.; its former wholly‑owned subsidiaries, Medical Management Systems, Inc., Med-Pharma Management, Inc., High Desert MMJ, Inc.; and it’s former majority-owned joint venture, Emerald Mountain Organics. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated entities are collectively referred to as “Company”.

Note C ‑ Going Concern Uncertainty

The Company currently owns a minority position in various mining claims and/or leases located in the Tombstone, Arizona Mining District. It is the Company’s intent to raise sufficient capital to successfully exploit the mineral deposits contained in these claims/leases. All other efforts started by the Company and/or its subsidiaries in prior periods were either unsuccessful or abandoned. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successful in the implementation or operation of its current business plan.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note C ‑ Going Concern Uncertainty - continued

The Company has limited operating history, limited cash on hand, no operating assets and has a business plan with inherent risk. Because of these factors, the Company’s auditors have issued an audit opinion on the Company’s financial statements which includes a statement describing our going concern status. This means, in the auditor’s opinion, substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern exists at the date of their opinion.

Because of the Company's lack of operating assets, the Company’s continuance may become fully dependent upon either future sales of securities and/or advances or loans from significant stockholders or corporate officers to provide sufficient working capital to preserve the integrity of the corporate entity during the development phase.

The Company's continued existence is dependent upon its ability to implement its business plan, generate sufficient cash flows from operations to support its daily operations, and provide sufficient resources to retire existing liabilities and obligations on a timely basis. The Company faces considerable risk in it’s business plan and a potential shortfall of funding due to our uncertainty to raise adequate capital in the equity securities market.

The Company is dependent upon existing cash balances to support its day‑to‑day operations. In the event that working capital sufficient to maintain the corporate entity and implement our business plan is not available, the Company’s existing controlling stockholders intend to maintain the corporate status of the Company and provide all necessary working capital support on the Company's behalf. However, no formal commitments or arrangements to advance or loan funds to the Company or repay any such advances or loans exist. There is no legal obligation for either management or existing controlling stockholders to provide additional future funding. Further, the Company is at the mercy of future economic trends and business operations for the Company’s existing controlling stockholders to have the resources available to support the Company.

The Company anticipates offering future sales of equity securities. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional funding through the sales of additional equity securities or, that such funding, if available, will be obtained on terms favorable to or affordable by the Company.

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 25,000,000 million shares of preferred stock and 500,000,000 shares of common stock. The Company’s ability to issue preferred stock may limit the Company’s ability to obtain debt or equity financing as well as impede the implementation of the Company’s business plan. The Company’s ability to issue these authorized but unissued securities may also negatively impact our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our debt or equity securities.

In such a restricted cash flow scenario, the Company would be unable to complete its business plan steps, and would, instead, delay all cash intensive activities. Without necessary cash flow, the Company may become dormant during the next twelve months, or until such time as necessary funds could be raised in the equity securities market.

While the Company is of the opinion that good faith estimates of the Company’s ability to secure additional capital in the future to reach its goals have been made, there is no guarantee that the Company will receive sufficient funding to sustain operations or implement any future business plan steps.

Note D ‑ Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1. Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all cash on hand and in banks, certificates of deposit and other highly‑liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash and cash equivalents.

2. Organization costs

The Company has adopted the provisions of provisions required by the Start‑Up Activities topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification whereby all costs incurred with the incorporation and reorganization of the Company were charged to operations as incurred.

3. Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized by the Company at the point at which a transaction is delivered or services are provided to a consumer at a fixed price, collection is reasonably assured, the Company has no remaining performance obligations and no right of return by the purchaser exists.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note D ‑ Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued

4. Income taxes

The Company files income tax returns in the United States of America and various states, as appropriate and applicable. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, as applicable, income tax examinations by regulatory taxing authorities for any period prior to January 1, 2012.

The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability accounts, as recorded when material to the financial statements, are entirely the result of temporary differences. Temporary differences generally represent differences in the recognition of assets and liabilities for tax and financial reporting purposes, primarily accumulated depreciation and amortization, allowance for doubtful accounts and vacation accruals.

The Company has adopted the provisions required by the Income Taxes topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Codification Topic requires the recognition of potential liabilities as a result of management’s acceptance of potentially uncertain positions for income tax treatment on a “more‑likely‑than‑not” probability of an assessment upon examination by a respective taxing authority. As a result of the implementation of Codification’s Income Tax Topic, the Company did not incur any liability for unrecognized tax benefits.

5. Income (Loss) per share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted‑average number of common shares outstanding during the respective period presented in our accompanying financial statements.

Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic income (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of common stock equivalents (primarily outstanding options and warrants).

Common stock equivalents represent the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of the outstanding stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method, at either the beginning of the respective period presented or the date of issuance, whichever is later, and only if the common stock equivalents are considered dilutive based upon the Company’s net income (loss) position at the calculation date.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, the Company does not have any outstanding items which could be deemed to be dilutive.

6. New and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

The Company is of the opinion that any and all other pending accounting pronouncements, either in the adoption phase or not yet required to be adopted, will not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

Note E ‑ Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and notes payable, as applicable, approximates fair value due to the short term nature of these items and/or the current interest rates payable in relation to current market conditions.

Interest rate risk is the risk that the Company’s earnings are subject to fluctuations in interest rates on either investments or on debt and is fully dependent upon the volatility of these rates. The Company does not use derivative instruments to moderate its exposure to interest rate risk, if any.

Financial risk is the risk that the Company’s earnings are subject to fluctuations in interest rates or foreign exchange rates and are fully dependent upon the volatility of these rates. The Company does not use derivative instruments to moderate its exposure to financial risk, if any.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note F - Mining Leases and Claims

On November 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement). Under the terms of this Agreement, the Company issued issue 284,580,000 shares of its common stock into escrow for the benefit of Armada Mining, Inc., an Arizona corporation, and/or its assigns (Armada) in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the historic Tombstone Mining District. The Agreement allows for the Company to acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. A copy of the Agreement was furnished as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on or about November 28, 2016.

This exchange resulted in Armada owning approximately 85% of the Company, post‑transaction. Subject to financing and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals; by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques; and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further development.

The completion of the acquisition of these currently non-performing claims/leases was initially subject to the completion of due diligence, acquisition of adequate financing and various regulatory approvals. On June 27, 2017, the Registrant announced that the due diligence process, although not totally complete, was sufficient to close the November 28, 2016 transaction. The transaction closed as follows:

The Company received from Armada 100% of the issued and outstanding stock in Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. This piece of the acquisition was recorded at the nominal value of approximately $1,000.

The Company received an assignment from Armada of approximately 45% of a specific group of claims/leases covering approximately 200 contiguous acres, subject to a “wrap” note issued in favor of Armada approximately equal to a note payable to the original lessee of approximately $200,000. This piece of the acquisition was recorded at approximately $400,000, which equals the value of the note payable being assumed and the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

The Company received an assignment from Armada of approximately 45% of a specific group of claims/leases covering approximately 700 contiguous acres, subject to a “wrap” note issued in favor of Armada approximately equal to a note payable to the original lessee of approximately $700,000. This piece of the transaction was recorded at approximately $1,400,000, which equals the approximate value of the note being assumed and the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

NOTE: in both b) and c) ‑ Armada will retain the remaining respective 55% in each specific group of claims/leases, subject to the generation of approximately $500,000 in net earnings from the respective claims AFTER the retirement of all affiliated debt. After the debt is retired and the $500,000 is paid to Armada, the residual 55% will transfer to the Company for no additional consideration.

The Company received an assignment of 100% of approximately ten (10) specific claims/leases acquired from the Bureau of Land Management by Jack T. Bauska, personally. This piece of the acquisition was recorded at the nominal value of $2,000, which approximates the founder’s cost related to Mr. Bauska’s expenses for acquisition and recording.

The Company received an assignment of 100% of certain claims/leases covering approximately 278 contiguous acres originally acquired by Jack T. Bauska, personally; subject to a 100% assumption of a note payable to the original lessee of approximately $560,000 and accrued interest of approximately $60,526. This piece of the transaction was valued at approximately $898,526, which equals the approximate value of the note being received and the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

The Company received an assignment of 47.5% of certain claims/leases, covering approximately 2,300 contiguous acres, controlled by an affiliate of Armada. At the time the Armada affiliate receives approximately $800,000 in net proceeds from the development of the affiliated claims, the Armada affiliate will transfer the residual 52.5% to the Registrant for no additional consideration. This piece of the transaction was valued at the nominal value of approximately $2,300,000, which equals the nominal intrinsic value of $1,000 per acre.

This aggregate transaction has an approximate initial gross asset value of approximately $5,000,526 with the issuance or assumption of underlying debt to initially acquire said claims/leases of approximately $1,460,000.

The “wrap” note issued to Armada is for an aggregate $900,000 and bears interest at 7.0% interest. The “wrap” note is due on December 31, 2018 and may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note F - Mining Leases and Claims - continued

The assumed note is in the principal amount of $560,000 and bears interest at 5.0%. This note originally matured on August 20, 2015, is secured by a Deed of Trust on the underlying claims/leases and no notice of default or demand for payment has been made by the initial borrower. Management is of the opinion that this note is currently in “demand” status and the underlying assets are not at risk for foreclosure.

Note G ‑ Notes Payable to Stockholders

On July 28, 2014, the Company entered into a $500,000 Line of Credit note payable with South Beach Live, Ltd. (South Beach), a Company stockholder and an entity related to a significant Company stockholder, to provide funds necessary to support the corporate entity and provide working capital to pursue business combination or acquisition opportunities. This note bore interest at 10.0% and matured in July 2015. This note replaced a non-interest bearing shareholder note payable to a former controlling stockholder that was assumed during a 2014 change in control transaction. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized an aggregate $4,973 as additional paid-in capital for the economic event related to the non-interest bearing feature on the assumed note payable through its retirement.

On September 30, 2015, the Company executed a replacement Promissory Note with the principal stockholder of South Beach Live, Ltd. in the amount of $927,000, bearing interest at 12.0% and payable in monthly installments of approximately $13,300, including accrued interest with a final maturity and balloon payment due on October 31, 2016.

On May 11, 2016, as a component of the aforementioned Settlement Agreement, the Company and Charles Stidham, who was, directly and indirectly, a controlling stockholder of the Company, entered into a new Promissory Note agreement dated March 31, 2016. The note is for the principal amount of $752,694.19, bears interest at 10.0% per annum and requires monthly debt service payments of approximately $15,992.55 commencing June 30, 2016 through June 30, 2017, at which time all remaining principal and accrued interest is due and payable. The note also contains a repayment clause where the principal and accrued interest may be paid in common stock of the Company at a conversion rate of $0.001 per share.

For all periods from the inception of the debt through the date of these financial statements, the lender formally suspended the common stock conversion clause contained in the note. On November 30, 2016, the lender notified the Company that the lender was exercising the common stock conversion clause for the repayment of $150 in debt and continuing the suspension of the conversion clause for the remaining balance of the debt. The continuation of the suspension of the conversion clause remains in effect as of the date of these financial statements. The Company is delinquent in making the scheduled monthly debt service payments and no action is expected to be taken by the lender.

Through June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, an aggregate of approximately $820,371 , inclusive of the effect of the June 1, 2016 Settlement Agreement, has been advanced to support the Company’s working capital needs. The Company is delinquent in making the required monthly installment payments.

Note H - Note Payable to Management Services Company

Concurrent with the November 2016 proposed transaction with Armada, the Company engaged the services of an unrelated third-party to provide management services to the Company on a “for fee” month-to-month informal agreement. Included in the services to be provided is a line-of-credit note payable up to the amount of $150,000 with interest at 6.0% per annum. The note matures on December 31, 2017 or when the Company completes a successful capital infusion of at least $500,000 directly related to the commencement of mining operations in and around Tombstone, Arizona. Through June 30, 2017, approximately $26,849 has been advanced against this line-of-credit.

Note I - Note Payable to Financial Services Firm

On February 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (MDA) with L2 Capital, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company (“L2 Capital”). Our MDA has several components: 1) Under the Equity Purchase Agreement (‘Equity Line”), the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to sell shares of its common stock to L2 Capital at 75% of the prevailing OTC market price, as determined by the public market over time periods set out in the Equity Line, for up to $3,000,000 and 2) Under the Registration Rights Agreement (“Registration Rights”), the Company is obliged to register the offering of shares to be put under the Equity Line with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S‑1, and certain Blue Sky regulators, so that L2 Capital may, presumably, resell such shares under our Rule 424 Prospectus.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note I - Note Payable to Financial Services Firm - continued

The Registrant paid a 3% capital commitment fee to L2 Capital, by issuing to it a $90,000 8% Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) The Note requires us to repay $45,000, with interest, in six (6) months, and the balance upon the effective date of the referenced Form S‑1, or an additional six (6) months, whichever is earlier. Our default would trigger conversion rights in favor of L2 Capital, permitting it to demand issuance of shares at a 30% discount to market sufficient to satisfy any amounts due.

Also included in the MDA are share reserve requirements, under which our transfer agent has agreed to maintain a portion of our authorized but unissued shares sufficient to meet our obligations under the Equity Line and Note.

Note J - Income Taxes

The components of income tax (benefit) expense for the each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are as follows:

	Six months		Six months
	ended		ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2017		2016
Federal:
Current	$	—	$	—
Deferred		—		—
		—		—
State:
Current		—		—
Deferred		—		—
		—		—

Total	$	—	$	—

As of June 30, 2017, after consideration of the pending Armada transaction, the Company will have an aggregate net operating loss carryforward(s) to offset future taxable income of approximately $90,000. The amount and availability of any net operating loss carryforward(s) will be subject to the limitations set forth in the Internal Revenue Code. Such factors as the number of shares ultimately issued within a three year look‑back period; whether there is a deemed more than 50 percent change in control; the applicable long‑term tax exempt bond rate; continuity of historical business; and subsequent income of the Company all enter into the annual computation of allowable annual utilization of any net operating loss carryforward(s).

The Company's income tax (benefit) expense for the each of the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are as follows:

	Six months			Six months
	ended			ended
	June 30,			June 30,
	2017			2016

Statutory rate applied to income before income taxes	$	(31,000	)	$	(32,600	)
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
State income taxes		—			—
Non-deductible charge for the effect of the partial conversion
of the note payable to common stock at less than “fair value”		—			—
Other, including reserve for deferred tax asset and application
of net operating loss carryforward(s)		31,000			32,600

Income tax expense	$	—		$	—

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note J - Income Taxes - continued

Temporary differences, consisting primarily of the prospective usage of net operating loss carryforwards give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively:

	June 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016
Deferred tax assets
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	31,000		$	447,400
Less valuation allowance		(31,000	)		(447,400	)

Net Deferred Tax Asset	$	—		$	—

During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively, the valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset increased (decreased) by approximately $(416,400) and $62,400, respectively.

Note K - Common Stock Transactions

On March 23, 2016, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation stating “After giving effect to a ten for one reverse split, Article III is amended to read as follows: The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is five hundred twenty five million (525,000,000) shares, of which five hundred million (500,000,000) shares, par value $0.001 per share, shall be designated as “Common Stock” and twenty five million (25,000,000) shares, par value $0.001 per share, shall be designated as “Preferred Stock.” The effect of this action is reflected in the accompanying financial statements as of the first day of the first period presented.

On January 15, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 50,000 shares for consulting services related to the provision of back-office and other management support services to marijuana dispensaries located in the State of Oregon. This stock was valued at $0.30 per share, which approximated the closing price on date of the issuance.

During the period ended March 31, 2015, South Beach Live, Inc., a corporation controlled by a majority shareholder of the Company, transferred 1,000,000 shares of its holdings in the Company’s common stock to consultants for ongoing services associated with marketing strategies. South Beach Live, Inc. is a related party and does not expect to be repaid for this transaction which was valued at approximately $300,000 and recorded as professional fees and contributed capital on the books of the Company.

On February 29, 2016, the Company filed a Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C with the Securities and Exchange Commission noting a pending 1 for 10 reverse split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock; as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, and a concurrent amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation setting the authorized capital of the Company from the authorized, as adjusted, 25,000,000 post-split shares of common stock to 500,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock and the authorized, as adjusted, 250,000 post-split shares of preferred stock to 25,000,000 shares of $0001 par value preferred stock. The time to implement the reverse split action has expired and no further action is anticipated by the Company’s Board of Directors.

On November 30, 2016, the stockholder controlling the outstanding promissory note for working capital notified the Company that he was withdrawing his suspension of the conversion clause in the promissory note for the conversion of only $150 in outstanding principal and continuing the suspension of the conversion clause for all remaining outstanding principal. This limited one-time conversion caused the issuance 0f 1,500,000 shares of common stock with a “fair value” of $217,350 resulting in a non-cash charge to operations of approximately $217,200, which is reflected as a component of interest expense in the accompanying financial statements.

On November 28, 2016, the Company entered into a Material Definitive Agreement (Agreement). Under the terms of this Agreement, the Company issued into escrow 284,580,000 shares of its common stock to Armada Mining, Inc., an Arizona corporation, and/or its assigns (Armada) in exchange for rights and interests in mining properties in the historic Tombstone Mining District. The Agreement allows for the Registrant to acquire rights and interests to approximately 3,800 acres of contiguous mineral leases, including some property acquired in fee simple, and ownership of 100% of Tombstone Development Company, which was formed in 1933, and is believed to be the oldest continually operating mining company in Arizona. A copy of the Agreement was furnished as an exhibit to a Form 8-K filed on or about November 28, 2016. This exchange resulted in Armada owning approximately 85% of the Company, post‑transaction. Subject to financing and various regulatory approvals, the Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for silver, as well as precious and base metals; by reopening and developing existing mines using modern equipment and techniques; and by completing an existing drill/test grid to establish the boundary of producible ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and further development. The completion of the acquisition of these currently non-performing claims/leases was initially subject to the completion of due diligence, acquisition of adequate financing and various regulatory approvals. On June 27, 2017, the Registrant completed the closing on the November 28, 2016 transaction.

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Note L - Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value. As of June 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively, there are no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Note M - Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated all other activity of the Company through the issue date of the financial statements and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the accompanying financial statements or disclosure in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(Remainder of this page left blank intentionally)

Item 2 ‑ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(1) Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this annual filing, including, without limitation, statements containing the words "believes", "anticipates", "expects" and words of similar import, constitute forward‑looking statements. Such forward‑looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward‑looking statements.

Such factors include, among others, the following: international, national and local general economic and market conditions: demographic changes; the ability of the Company to sustain, manage or forecast its growth; the ability of the Company to successfully make and integrate acquisitions; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; and other factors referenced in this and previous filings.

Given these uncertainties, readers of this Form 10‑Q and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward‑looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward‑looking statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments.

(2) General

Historical Background

The Company was originally incorporated as SW China Imports, Inc. on February 23, 2011 in the State of Nevada. The Company’s initial business plan was to import high‑end handmade lace wigs, hairpieces, and other beauty supplies and accessories manufactured overseas into the United States.

In June 2014, the Company changed its name to Med‑Cannabis Pharma, Inc. and implemented a new business plan to enter into the retail sale of medical and personal use marijuana, where allowable. In October 2015, the Company changed its name to MCPI, Inc.

As of September 30, 2015, Medical Management Systems, Inc. held a Management Contract for three marijuana dispensaries located in Newport, Bend, and Cottage Grove, Oregon, which are owned by a company controlled by a related party. This Management Contract was terminated by the consent of both parties, effective March 31, 2016. Med-Pharma only conducted introductory due diligence efforts in the State of Washington and, currently, has abandoned all activities in the State of Washington. Emerald Mountain Organics had, as of September 30,2015, established an early-phase growing operation and has generated nominal sales.

During the first 10 days of October 2015, the Company’s subsidiary, High Desert MMJ, Inc., learned that the 1.0% minority partner in the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture had absconded with all of the assets of the joint venture. Efforts to locate and recover either the individuals representing said 1.0% minority partner or the said absconded assets were unsuccessful. Accordingly, effective October 10, 2015, High Desert MMJ, Inc. abandoned the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture and wrote off its investment. The cumulative start-up losses in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the Emerald Mountain Organics joint venture, through the date of abandonment were approximately $53,000 and the Company recognized a loss on the stolen assets of approximately $51,000 during the quarter ended December 31, 2015.

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Settlement, General and Mutual Release of Claims and Assignment of Interest Transfer Agreement (Settlement Agreement) with its majority shareholder and a related party. The Settlement Agreement relates to the Company’s management of three medical marijuana dispensaries (Stores) located in Oregon, which are owned by Bendor Investments, Ltd. (Bendor), whose sole shareholder is Charles Stidham. The Company owed Mr. Stidham approximately $1,100,000, including accrued interest, as of the date of the Settlement Agreement.

The Company asserted a claim for management fees of approximately $80,000 and reimbursement of approximately $343,000 for the services of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Medical Management Systems, Inc. (MMS), in managing the Stores. Bendor disputed this claim. To resolve the dispute, the parties agreed to forgive the accrued management fees and to offset the approximately $343,000 due from Bendor against the approximately $1,100,000 owed to Mr. Stidham with the Company releasing any and all interests it may have had in the Stores and MMS. Additionally, the Company agreed to assign a trademark to Mr. Stidham as well as executing a new Note in the principal sum of $752,694.19. The effect of the June 1, 2016 Settlement Agreement , due to the timing of this release of these amended financial statements and this transaction, is reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the Company, in anticipation of consummating a proposed asset acquisition transaction, changed its name to Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.

Current Operations

The “wrap” note issued to Armada is for an aggregate $900,000 and bears interest at 7.0% interest. The “wrap” note is due on December 31, 2018 and may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

(3) Results of Operations

The Company has no recognized revenues for either of the respective six or three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

In conjunction with the Company’s business plan, as discussed in Item I of the December 31, 2016 Form 10-K, the Company expended considerable effort and financial resources in prior periods, for the implementation of its former business plan(s). During Calendar 2016, the Company incurred operating expenses requiring cash payments of approximately $86,000 which were funded through a line-of-credit with an entity affiliated with the Company’s then-controlling stockholder.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred operating costs, principally professional fees, of approximately $45,000, directly related to the maintenance of the corporate entity, compliance with the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and various other nominal costs related to the proposed Armada transaction.

Earnings (Loss) per share for the respective three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were $(0.00) and $(0.00) based on the weighted-average shares issued and outstanding at the end of each respective period.

It is anticipated that future expenditure levels will remain relatively consistent until such time that the Company fully implements its current business plan, at which time, the Company’s expenses and working capital requirements may increase significantly.

The Company does not expect to generate any meaningful revenue or incur operating expenses for purposes other than fulfilling the obligations of a reporting company under the Exchange Act unless and until such time that the Company begins meaningful operations.

(4) Plan of Business

The Company is the owner of 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Tombstone Development Corp. (TDC) and, directly and through TDC, owns or controls more than 3,800 acres of mineral leases and claims in the Tombstone Mining District (collectively, the “Mining Properties”). TDC is one of the oldest mining companies in Arizona, having continuously operated since 1933. The Mining Properties contain numerous historic mine sites, including the Lucky Cuss, Tough Nut, Old Guard, Ace in the Hole, Solstice and Ground Hog, and significant undeveloped properties in the Western Mining District running from the downslope of the Tombstone caldera.

Because of TDC’s history, it has become the repository of a significant library of technical and other information concerning previous mining activities in the Tombstone Mining District. This proprietary data was assembled or acquired by TDC’s previous management, often from failed or defunct companies, and much of it is not reproduced in public records. The availability of this data provides the Company with an advantage in identifying and quantifying potential recovery from historic mine sites. Our review of this data, along with assays of previously mined, unprocessed materials in surface dumps on historic mine sites, forms the basis for the estimates provided herein.

The Company intends to commence development of these properties by processing previously mined materials for, primarily, silver with corresponding traces of gold, as well as other precious and base metals, by processing surface dumped materials, the reopening and redevelopment of existing mines using modern equipment and techniques. We also intend to complete a comprehensive core drilling grid of undeveloped properties that fill in areas between known productive ore bodies, in anticipation of a Bankable Feasibility Study and the possibility of future development activities.

On August 17, 2017, Mr. Frank H. Blair, an independent consultant to the Company, issued “A Fair Value Opinion” (Opinion) for the approximate 3,800 acre property held by the Company in the Tombstone Mining District, Cochise County, Arizona is based upon the Consultant’s opinion as to either he would want to sell or buy the property. This reflective valuation was built upon visits, by the Consultant, to the various patented and unpatented claims held by the Company, visits to the County Courthouse and, most importantly, an eight day onsite office review of the Company’s extensive files relating to the development and exploitation of these mining properties dating back to 1882. Separate files in the author’s library or researched online are comprised of available PhD and Master Theses within the Tombstone Mining District. Nine selected references from the Company’s files were appended to the Opinion.

Per Mr. Blair’s research and opinion, major silver deposits that made the Tombstone district famous occur in the Bisbee Group of the Tombstone Basin. A 1988 written communication, mentioned in USGS Bulletin 2042-B, reported wealth from the district was about$463 million (1988 dollars) from 1.5 million tons of ore. Most of the exploitation was of oxidized ore that produced 32 million ounces of silver, which would amount to $540 million at estimated 2017 market prices.

Mr. Blair closes his Opinion with the following: “If the writer should make a decision to purchase or sell the Mansfield-Martin properties in the Tombstone District, Cochise County, Arizona, the recommendation would be an affirmative yes to PURCHASE the M&M Tombstone properties. A value placed on the Lucky Cuss Structural trend could, from the five underground mines along the 3,500 foot trend, produce approximately 1,400,000 ounces of metal containing an average of 0.210 oz. Au/ton and 45oz. Ag/ ton. With gold at $1,200/ounce and silver at $17/ounce, this would produce a gross value of $24 million. The other two targets in the initial exploration program will probably be equal to or surpass the Lucky Cuss Trend. A total fair value of the Mansfield-Martin Tombstone Program can be subjectively adjusted to a gross value of $72,000,000."

As of the date of this filing, Mansfield-Martin has not commenced recovery or other mining activities on its properties. We have identified mineralized material in surface dumps and existing shafts, as well as from core drilling and placer deposit assays on undeveloped properties. Mineralized material in surface dumps and existing shafts warrants further development; the extent of such materials on undeveloped properties, as well as the quality thereof, warrants further exploration.

“Mineralized material” as used in this prospectus, although permissible under SEC Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards. We cannot be certain that any part of our property will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves.” Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the mineralized material will ever be confirmed or converted into reserves or that mineralized material can be economically or legally extracted. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Exploration Stage Status” on page XX and “SEC Industry Guide 7 Definitions” on page XX.

The Company is currently in discussion with multiple entities to provide working and development capital, including scenarios covering a proposed 50%/50% of net profits after the recovery of development costs; the right to acquire 100% of the precious metals output from development at a negotiated discount to the market price until such time that all development costs are recovered and then the purchase of all remaining output at market price; and the acquisition of development and working capital through the private placement of the Registrant’s equity securities or debt instruments. All of these opportunities are being aggressively pursued by management; however, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully consummate any of these opportunities or, that any of these opportunities, if available, will be able to be obtained on terms favorable to or affordable by the Company.

If any of these working and development capital opportunities are successfully consummated, the Company anticipates the start of production activities by the end of Calendar 2017.

(5) Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, the Company had working capital of approximately $(2,656,000) and $(953,000).

It is the belief of management and significant stockholders that they will provide sufficient working capital necessary to support and preserve the integrity of the corporate entity. However, there is no legal obligation for either management or significant stockholders to provide additional future funding. Further, the Company is at the mercy of future economic trends and business operations for the Company’s majority stockholder to have the resources available to support the Company. Should this pledge to provide continuing financing not be fulfilled, the Company has not identified any alternative sources. Consequently, there is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company's need for working capital may change dramatically as a result of any future business transaction. There can be no assurance that the Company will identify and/or enter into any business transaction in the future. Further, there can be no assurance that the Company would be successful in consummating any acquisition on favorable terms or that it will be able to profitably manage the business, product, technology or company it acquires.

The Company has no current plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale or issuance of additional securities prior to the location of a potential business transaction. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that sufficient funds will be available to the Company to allow it to cover the expenses related to such activities.

Regardless of whether the Company’s cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet the Company’s operational needs, the Company might seek to compensate providers of services by issuances of stock in lieu of cash.

(6) Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note D of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact our financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

Item 3 ‑ Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required of a smaller reporting company.

Item 4 ‑ Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers (Certifying Officers), have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a‑15 promulgated under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Certifying Officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, our Certifying Officers have concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in our reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC due to a inherent weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting due to our status as a shell corporation and having a sole supervising officer. However, our Certifying Officers believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the respective periods presented.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls

There were no other significant changes (including other corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II ‑ Other Information

Item 1 ‑ Legal Proceedings

None

Item 1A – Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Reg. 240.12b‑2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 2 ‑ Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On January 3, 2017, the Company issued 284,580,000 shares of its restricted, unregistered common stock into escrow pending the ultimate consummation of the Armada transaction, as previously discussed. On June 27, 2017, the Company completed the Armada transaction and released the shares from escrow.

Item 3 ‑ Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4 ‑ Mine Safety Disclosure

As of the date of this filing, the Company has no known reportable events as defined in Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Act and does not anticipate nor is aware of any reportable events known to potentially or actually exist within the Armada transaction.

Item 5 ‑ Other Information

None.

Item 6 - Exhibits

31.1 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Chief Executive and Financial Officer

32.1 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Chief Executive and Financial Officer

101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T. (To be filed by Amendment)

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc.



Dated: September 22, 2017		/s/ John T. Bauska
		John T. Bauska
		Chief Executive and Financial Officer

Mansfield-Martin Exploration Mining, Inc. 10-Q