As filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2009.

Registration No. 333-153655

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 2 to

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Edgen Murray Limited

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Bermuda	5051	98-0593440
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Clarendon House

2 Church Street

Hamilton, HM 11

Bermuda

(441) 295-1422

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including

area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Daniel J. O’Leary

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

18444 Highland Road

Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809

(225) 756-9868

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

With Copies to:

Carmen J. Romano, Esq.

Adam M. Fox, Esq.

Dechert LLP

1095 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10036

(212) 698-3500

T. Mark Kelly, Esq.

David H. Stone, Esq.

Vinson & Elkins LLP

1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 758-2222

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), check the following box. ¨

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. ¨

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED FEBRUARY 4, 2009

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

LOGO

Common Shares

This is the initial public offering of the common shares of Edgen Murray Limited. We are offering common shares and the selling shareholders identified in this prospectus are offering an additional common shares. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the common shares sold by the selling shareholders. We currently anticipate that the estimated initial public offering price will be between $ and $ per share.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common shares. We have applied to list our common shares on the NYSE under the symbol “EMY.”

Investing in our common shares involves risks. See “Risk factors” beginning on page 12.


	Per share	Total
Public offering price	$	$
Underwriting discount and commissions	$	$
Proceeds to Edgen Murray Limited (before expenses)	$	$
Proceeds to the selling shareholders (before expenses)	$	$

Certain of our shareholders have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional common shares at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount, to cover over-allotments, if any.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other regulatory body or commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The underwriters expect to deliver the common shares on or about , 2009.

Jefferies & Company

, 2009

[Pictorial Image to Come]

Table of contents


Prospectus summary		1
Risk factors		12
Special note regarding forward-looking statements		25
Use of proceeds		26
Dividend policy		27
Capitalization		28
Dilution		29
Selected historical consolidated financial information of Edgen Murray II, L.P.		31
Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information		35
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations		41
Business		72
Management		86
Principal and selling shareholders		105
Certain relationships and related person transactions		107
Description of our share capital		112
Shares eligible for future sale		120
US federal and Bermuda income tax considerations		121
Underwriting		125
Legal matters		129
Experts		129
Enforceability of certain judgments and service of process		130
Currency and exchange rate information		130
Where you can find more information		131

About this prospectus

All information in this prospectus assumes that the underwriters do not exercise their 30-day option to purchase additional common shares from certain of our shareholders, unless otherwise indicated.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or to which we have referred you, including any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. This prospectus may only be used where it is legal to sell these securities. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date. You should not under any circumstances construe the delivery of this prospectus or any sale made hereunder to imply that the information in this prospectus is correct as of any date subsequent to the date on the front cover of this prospectus.

The Bermuda Monetary Authority has designated us as a non-resident for Bermuda exchange control purposes. This designation allows us to engage in transactions in currencies other than the Bermuda dollar and there are no exchange control restrictions on our ability to transfer funds, other than funds denominated in Bermuda dollars, in and out of Bermuda or to pay dividends to US residents who are holders of our common shares.

The Bermuda Monetary Authority also has given its consent for the issue and free transferability of all of the common shares that are the subject of this offering to and between non-residents of Bermuda for exchange control purposes.

Approvals or permissions given by the Bermuda Monetary Authority do not constitute a guarantee by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as to our performance or our creditworthiness. Accordingly, in giving such consent or permissions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority shall not be liable for the financial soundness, performance or default of our business or for the correctness of any opinions or statements expressed in this prospectus. In some cases, issuances and transfers of common shares involving persons deemed resident in Bermuda for exchange control purposes require the specific consent of the Bermuda Monetary Authority.

We will file this prospectus with the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda pursuant to Part III of the Companies Act of 1981 (Bermuda), as amended. In accepting this prospectus for filing, the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda shall not be liable for the financial soundness, performance or default of our business or for the correctness of any opinions or statements expressed in this prospectus.

Special note regarding industry and market data

This prospectus contains estimates regarding market data which are based on our internal estimates, independent industry publications, reports by market research firms and/or other published independent sources. In each case, we believe those estimates are reasonable and reliable but have not independently verified the accuracy of any such third party information. However, market data is subject to change and cannot always be verified with complete certainty due to limits on the availability and reliability of raw data, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other limitations and uncertainties inherent in any statistical survey of market data.

Prospectus summary

The following summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common shares. You should read carefully the following summary together with the rest of this prospectus, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements and the section entitled “Risk factors.” Some of the statements in the following summary are forward-looking statements. See “Special note regarding forward-looking statements.”

Edgen Murray Limited was incorporated in August 2008 to serve as a future holding company for our non-North American subsidiaries. Prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, Edgen Murray Limited will also become the holding company for our North American subsidiaries in a transaction we refer to as the “Contribution,” and, as our new parent holding company, will serve as the issuer in this offering. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Formation of Edgen Murray Limited and the Contribution.” As a result, the historical financial information included in this prospectus represents the consolidated financial statements of our current parent holding company, Edgen Murray II, L.P., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as their predecessors.

Unless we state otherwise, “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms, refer to Edgen Murray II, L.P. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and their predecessors for the periods before the Contribution, and Edgen Murray Limited and its wholly-owned subsidiaries for the periods after the Contribution. When we refer to “pro forma” results, we are referring to our results after taking into account the adjustments described in “Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.”

Overview

We are a leading global distributor of specialty steel products primarily to energy infrastructure markets. The products we distribute include highly-engineered prime carbon or alloy steel pipe, pipe components, valves and high-grade structural sections and plate. These items are often designed to operate in severe conditions (including high pressure and extreme temperature environments) or to withstand the effects of corrosive or abrasive materials. We maintain a broad inventory of more than 14,000 specialty products including a large selection of valves, components and more than 100,000 tons of pipes, plate and sections.

Our global sales and distribution network enables us to efficiently procure and deliver our entire product offering worldwide. We stock and distribute inventory and support our customers through a global network of facilities located on four continents. This allows us to service projects in remote and challenging locations, while also supporting the daily maintenance, repair and operation (“MRO”) requirements of installed facilities. We employ experienced local market specialists and sales personnel, many of whom have technical backgrounds, training or relevant industry experience, in all of the regions in which we operate. To augment our extensive product line, we offer our customers specialized product knowledge, technical consultation, global logistical support and project management and procurement services. These services include inventory management and just-in-time product delivery, which results in product delivery to our customers when they are ready to use it so they can reduce their inventory carrying costs. We have a broad customer base of more than 2,750 customers and deliver our products in more than 50 countries.

from manufacturers, benefiting both our customers and our vendors. We believe our global scale and purchasing power has allowed us to establish strong ties and preferential purchasing terms with our vendors. We also provide support to our vendors through our sales, marketing and credit functions, with respect to the products we distribute.

Over the past three years, we have completed four strategic acquisitions. These acquisitions have increased our scale by expanding our geographic coverage, adding complementary product lines and increasing our product sourcing within existing product lines. In each acquisition, we were able to enhance operating results by fully integrating the acquired businesses and product lines across our global platform with limited incremental overhead costs.

Our total revenue, income from operations and net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $900.2 million, $108.6 million and $50.3 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2007, pro forma revenue, income from operations and net income was $951.1 million, $80.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Income from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and pro forma income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 include $17.7 million and $25.3 million, respectively, of depreciation and amortization expense. Pro forma income from operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 also includes $2.0 million of compensation expense related to one-time equity grants, and $2.5 million of non-recurring transaction expenses in selling, general and administrative expense. See “—Summary historical consolidated and unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.”

Industry trends

Over the past decade, both vendors and end users have increasingly focused on efficiently managing their sales and supply chains, often by using distributors like us. Many of our vendors have become increasingly reliant on distributors to provide products and value-added services at the local level to end customers while customers have increasingly turned to distributors to manage the logistics and delivery of their orders. Although falling commodity prices and the worldwide economic slowdown have negatively impacted near-term prospects for many of our customers, we continue to believe that the long-term outlook in our markets is positive. We believe the following factors in particular will continue to support spending in the end markets we serve and, in turn, drive demand for our specialized products:

•

Increasing global demand for crude oil and natural gas over the long term. The rapid development of some of the world’s most populous countries (notably, Brazil, Russia, India and China) will continue the long-term increase in global energy demand and significant investment in energy infrastructure will be required to meet that demand.

•

Conventional producing regions confronting rising depletion rates and geopolitical instability. While demand for crude oil and natural gas is expected to increase over the long-term, existing oil and natural gas production in many major producing regions is declining or is threatened by political and civil instability. This has caused oil and natural gas companies to increase exploration and development activities in deeper waters offshore and to develop unconventional reserves onshore.

•

Significant capital investment in unconventional oil and natural gas production, particularly in North America. Advances in technology and declines in conventional reserves have spurred interest in unconventional oil and natural gas deposits such as Canada’s vast oil sands and the natural gas shales in the United States. Many of these new resources exist in parts of the country that currently lack sufficient gathering, processing, treating and storage infrastructure.

•

Continuing investment in oil and natural gas transmission capacity. To meet North American energy demand, investment in the expansion of natural gas transmission capacity has increased. Numerous large scale projects are being undertaken across the continent in order to transport natural gas from isolated producing regions to markets that face short supply. The existing pipeline network is also aging, necessitating more maintenance and repair operations.

•

Aging global refining and processing capacity necessitating modernization, infrastructure expansion and newbuild projects. Investment in refining and processing infrastructure has been limited over the past 20 years. Significant expansion projects are in process and expected to be undertaken in the United States and major

new facilities are under construction in developing markets, particularly in the Middle East, India and China. Furthermore, many existing refineries must be retrofitted in order to process heavier, sourer crude instead of the light sweet crude for which they were originally constructed.

•

Global investment in power generation capacity. As developing economies bring power to rural communities in support of their industrialization, substantial new electricity capacity is required. In addition, many developed economies continue to enact environmental regulations that will require the retirement or refurbishment of older power facilities. Due to these factors, the demand for new or replacement power generation capacity continues to increase.

Our competitive strengths

We consider the following to be our principal competitive strengths:

•

Our global distribution model. Our global distribution network enables us to provide our customers with procurement and project management services wherever they need them all around the world. We believe that we distinguish ourselves from our competitors because we have built a global platform and broad product offering that combines local knowledge and presence to meet our customers’ needs for the purchase and delivery of high-performance specialty steel products.

•

We have strong vendor relationships. We are a volume purchaser of specialty steel products, and we believe that we serve as a critical link between our vendors and our customers. Many of the products we supply are difficult for individual customers to purchase on a cost-effective basis directly from manufacturers since the manufacturers tend to hold limited inventories and often require large orders and lengthy lead times for new production runs. We have demonstrated to our vendors that we are a consistent, high-volume purchaser of their products and a valuable, reliable sales channel. As a result, we believe that we have developed strong, long-standing relationships and have negotiated preferred pricing and delivery terms with key vendors. We believe these relationships would be difficult for others to replicate.

•

Our senior management team is experienced and incentivized. Each member of our senior management team has more than 20 years of industry experience. In addition, many of our senior managers have experience that is specific to the relevant industries and geographies we serve and in acquiring and integrating new businesses. The compensation of our senior managers is tied to financial performance measures, which we believe aligns their interests with our shareholders. Following the closing of this offering, our senior management will own approximately % of our common shares.

Our business strategy

We intend to continue to grow our business by utilizing the following strategies:

•

Increasing the size of our addressable market and our overall market presence. We will seek to attract new customers in the geographic areas and product markets we serve. We also intend to expand our overall specialty product offering to fit our customers’ planned capital expenditure requirements and meet their ongoing MRO needs. Lastly, we will continue to expand and further penetrate the geographic markets we serve. Through these efforts we will seek to capture a higher portion of our customers’ overall spending on specialty products.

•

Leveraging our investment in people, locations, inventory and systems. We believe our global scale, specialty product offering, robust information systems and trained and experienced personnel combine to help our customers optimize their procurement practices. We will leverage this investment to expand our business in existing, developed markets and to achieve greater penetration of emerging high-growth markets (particularly in those where we already have a presence). Our hiring practices, training, business systems, product additions, inventory and location development will be guided by the need to meet our customers’ requirements.

•

Optimizing our vendor relationships, purchasing and inventory levels. We will utilize our position as a leading global distributor to maintain suitable inventories and access to production of specialty steel products. We believe our steady order-flow of specialty products allows our vendors to optimize their production planning and encourages our vendors to give us preferred or sole channel access to their specialty products. We believe our customers and vendors appreciate this important and deep relationship we have in providing timely purchasing and availability of product to the markets we serve.

•

Pursuing opportunistic acquisitions, strategic investments, specialty product additions and global expansion. We will continue to seek opportunities to strengthen our platform through selective acquisitions, strategic investments and specialty product additions. In particular, we will consider investments that enhance our global presence and enable us to leverage our existing operations. We also intend to selectively expand existing offices and establish additional offices, particularly in Asia and South America, to facilitate our expansion into emerging markets and to better serve our growing customer base in these regions.

Our history and formation

Through our predecessor companies, we have been in the business of distributing specialty steel products for more than 30 years. In February 2005, certain funds, which we refer to collectively as “Fund III,” managed by Jefferies Capital Partners, which we refer to as “JCP,” and certain members of our management acquired one of our predecessors, Edgen Corporation. We refer to this transaction as the “Buy-out Transaction.” We significantly expanded our presence in Canada in July 2005 through the acquisition of Western Flow Products, Inc., a specialty steel distributor in Alberta. We formed a holding company, Edgen/Murray L.P., to effect the December 16, 2005 acquisition of UK-based Murray International Metals Limited, a leading global distributor of high-grade steel products primarily to the offshore oil and natural gas industry. This acquisition, which we refer to as the “MIM Acquisition,” gave us an enhanced global presence and eventually led us to change our name to Edgen Murray. The MIM Acquisition was facilitated through our UK subsidiary, Pipe Acquisition Limited.

In May 2007, Edgen Murray II, L.P., a newly formed holding company, acquired our business in a transaction led by certain funds, which we refer to collectively as “Fund IV.” Although the funds comprising Fund IV are also managed by JCP, they are not the same as the funds comprising Fund III that led the Buy-out Transaction. We refer to this transaction and the concurrent refinancing of our senior indebtedness as the “Recapitalization Transaction.” In conjunction with the Recapitalization Transaction, we acquired the high performance steel plate distribution business of Petro Steel International, L.P. and Petro Steel International, LLC, which we refer to as “PetroSteel.” The PetroSteel acquisition allowed us to fill out the uppermost ranges of our steel plate product line. Subsequently, in August 2007, we acquired Equipment Valve & Supply, Inc., which we refer to as “EVS,” to further expand our product line into the specialty valve business.

Edgen Murray Limited was incorporated in August 2008 to serve as a future holding company for our non-North American subsidiaries. Edgen Murray II, L.P. transferred these subsidiaries to Edgen Murray Limited on . Prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, Edgen Murray Limited will also become the holding company for our North American subsidiaries as a result of the Contribution and, as our new parent holding company, will serve as the issuer in this offering. In the Contribution, Edgen Murray II, L.P. will distribute to the partners of Edgen Murray II, L.P. the shares of Edgen Murray Limited and the shares of Edgen Murray Corporation, which is the holding company for our North American subsidiaries. The partners will then contribute the shares of Edgen Murray Corporation to Edgen Murray Limited in exchange for additional shares of Edgen Murray Limited. For each contributed share, the partners will receive shares of Edgen Murray Limited. As a result, the partners, including Fund IV, will receive common shares of Edgen Murray Limited representing an ownership interest in Edgen Murray Limited that is equivalent to their ownership interest in Edgen Murray II, L.P. The Contribution will be accounted for as a business combination among entities under common control and the historical carryover basis of assets and liabilities will remain unchanged. As a result, the Contribution will not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows as of the date of the Contribution. Unless otherwise indicated, the disclosure in this prospectus gives effect to the Contribution. See “Capitalization” and “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Formation of Edgen Murray Limited and the Contribution.”

The following charts illustrate the impact of the Contribution on our organizational structure:

LOGO

Jefferies & Company, Inc.

Jefferies & Company, Inc. is participating as an underwriter in this offering and will be entitled to underwriting discounts and commissions with respect to the common shares purchased by it in this offering. See “Underwriting — Discounts and expenses.” The parent company of Jefferies & Company, Inc. is Jefferies Group, Inc. (“Jefferies Group”). Mr. Brian P. Friedman, who is a director of Jefferies Group and Chairman of the Executive Committee of Jefferies & Company, Inc., is the President and one of the managing members of JCP. Jefferies Group directly or indirectly has made a substantial investment in and has a substantial, non-voting economic interest in JCP and Fund IV and has guaranteed a portion of the debt provided by a third party lender to one of the funds comprising Fund IV. In addition, Jefferies Group employs and provides office space for JCP’s employees, for which JCP reimburses Jefferies Group on an annual basis. Mr. James L. Luikart is the Executive Vice President and one of the managing members of JCP and a director of ours, and Mr. Nicholas Daraviras is a Managing Director of JCP and a director of ours.

As an underwriter, Jefferies & Company, Inc. has an option to buy additional common shares from the selling shareholders, including Fund IV, pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotment option. As selling shareholders in this offering, the funds comprising Fund IV will receive the net proceeds from the offering of their shares equal to $ (assuming an initial public offering price of $ per common share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus). See “Use of proceeds” and “Principal and selling shareholders.” Pursuant to our bye-laws and an investor rights agreement we intend to enter into prior to the closing of this offering, as long as JCP or funds managed by JCP beneficially own at least 5% of our then-outstanding common shares, JCP will be entitled to have a representative attend meetings of our board of directors as a non-voting observer. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Investors and Registration Rights Agreement.”

Jefferies Finance LLC, a joint venture owned in part by Jefferies Group, is a lender under our first lien term loan credit agreement, a portion of which will be repaid with the net proceeds to us of this offering. As a result, Jefferies Finance LLC will receive approximately % of the net proceeds to us of this offering. See “Use of proceeds.”

Jefferies & Company, Inc. is deemed to have a “conflict of interest” under Rule 2720 of the Conduct Rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, because JCP is an affiliate of Jefferies & Company, Inc. and JCP manages funds that own more than 10% of our common shares. Accordingly, this offering will be made in compliance with the applicable provisions of Rule 2720 of the Conduct Rules. That rule requires that the initial public offering price can be no higher than that recommended by a “qualified independent underwriter,” as defined by FINRA. See “Underwriting — Relationships.”

Risk factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks as more fully described in the “Risk factors” section of this prospectus. You should carefully consider such risks, and all of the information set forth in this prospectus, before deciding to invest in our common shares.

Company information

Edgen Murray Limited is incorporated as an exempted company under Bermuda law and maintains its registered office and principal executive offices in Bermuda at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda. Our telephone number in Bermuda is (441) 295-1422.

We maintain a web site at www.edgenmurray.com. Our web site and the information contained thereon or connected thereto is not incorporated into this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. You should not rely on any such information in making your decision whether to purchase our securities.

The Offering

Offering price

$ per common share.

Common shares offered by us

common shares.

Common shares offered by the selling shareholders

common shares.

Common shares to be outstanding immediately after this offering ⁽¹⁾

common shares.

Listing

We have applied to list our common shares on the NYSE under the symbol “EMY.” The common shares will not be listed on any other exchange or traded on any other automated quotation system.

Option to purchase additional common shares

Certain of our shareholders have granted to the underwriters an option, which is exercisable within 30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to an additional common shares. See “Underwriting” for more information.

Use of proceeds

We estimate that the net proceeds we will receive from this offering will be approximately $ million, after deducting the underwriting discount and commissions and the estimated offering fees and expenses payable by us and assuming an initial public offering price of $ per common share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. We intend to use such net proceeds to repay a portion of our first lien term loans. See “Use of proceeds” for additional information. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of our common shares by the selling shareholders, a group which includes certain of our officers and directors and affiliates of Jefferies & Company, Inc., an underwriter in this offering. See “Underwriting — Relationships.”

(1)	Excludes shares issuable upon exercise of options to purchase our common shares that are currently outstanding.

Summary historical consolidated and

unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information

Background

In reviewing the financial information presented below and elsewhere in this prospectus, you should consider that the comparability of this information from period to period may be affected by the transactions we have undertaken in these periods and the accounting treatment for those transactions, as more fully described in “Selected historical consolidated financial information of Edgen Murray II, L.P.” and “Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.” For example, we applied fair value purchase accounting to the Buy-out Transaction, the MIM Acquisition and the PetroSteel and EVS acquisitions, with the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including goodwill and other intangibles, recorded at their respective fair values as of each acquisition date. The Recapitalization Transaction, however, was accounted for as a business combination of entities under common control for financial reporting purposes because the same principals of JCP controlled both Edgen/Murray, L.P. and Edgen Murray II, L.P. Accordingly, we maintained the historical carryover basis of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities rather than recording them at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Recapitalization Transaction.”

References in this prospectus and our consolidated financial statements to the “Predecessor” in respect of the periods prior to the Buy-out Transaction are references to Edgen Corporation and references to the “Successor” mean:

•

Edgen Corporation and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods prior to the December 16, 2005 MIM Acquisition;

•

Edgen/Murray, L.P. and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods after the MIM Acquisition and prior to the May 11, 2007 Recapitalization Transaction; and

•

Edgen Murray II, L.P. and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods after the Recapitalization Transaction.

Summary historical consolidated financial information

Our summary historical consolidated statement of operations, cash flow and other financial data for the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005 (Predecessor), the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, and the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 (Successor), and our summary historical consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Our summary historical condensed consolidated statement of operations, cash flow and other financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 and our summary historical condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2008 are derived from our interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, our summary unaudited historical consolidated financial data include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company on a consolidated basis, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future performance or results of operations, and results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year.

Summary unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information

Our summary unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information for the year ended December 31, 2007 has been prepared to give pro forma effect to the following transactions as if they had occurred on January 1, 2007, the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year:

•

the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007; and

•

the PetroSteel acquisition on May 11, 2007.

In addition, we present this pro forma information on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the issuance of common shares in this offering and the repayment of $ million of our first lien term loans with the expected net proceeds to us (assuming an initial public offering price of $ per common share, which is the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), as if these transactions had occurred on January 1, 2007.

In deriving the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information, we also obtained financial information from PetroSteel’s historical audited combined consolidated statement of operations for the period January 1, 2007 to May 11, 2007, included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The summary unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information presented below is for informational purposes only and should not be considered indicative of actual results that would have been achieved had the transactions described above actually been consummated on the dates indicated and does not purport to be indicative of balance sheet data or results of operations as of any future date or for any future period.

The summary historical consolidated and unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information presented below represents portions of our financial statements and is not complete. You should read this information in conjunction with, and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the sections in this prospectus entitled “Selected historical consolidated financial information of Edgen Murray II, L.P.,” “Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information” and “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and our audited consolidated and unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, PetroSteel’s audited combined financial statements and Murray International Metals Limited’s audited consolidated financial statements, and in each case the related notes thereto, contained elsewhere in this prospectus.

The following tables set forth, for the periods and dates indicated, our summary historical consolidated and unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information.


	Predecessor			Successor
(dollars in thousands)	Period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005			Period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 ⁽¹⁾			Year ended December 31, 2006			Year ended December 31, 2007			Pro forma year ended December 31, 2007⁽²⁾			Pro forma as adjusted year ended December 31, 2007	Nine months ended September 30, 2007			Nine months ended September 30, 2008
(dollars in thousands)							Year ended December 31, 2006			Year ended December 31, 2007						Pro forma as adjusted year ended December 31, 2007	Nine months ended September 30, 2007			Nine months ended September 30, 2008
Statement of operations:
Sales	$	18,945		$	303,361		$	686,937		$	917,657		$	951,109		$	$	656,103		$	900,218
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)		14,153			241,346			548,744			748,722			776,351				530,344			706,930
Selling, general and administrative expense ⁽³⁾		14,364			29,962			60,292			68,310			69,449				49,897			67,018
Depreciation and amortization expense		201			7,602			21,051			22,570			25,315				12,883			17,666

Total operating expenses		28,718			278,910			630,087			839,602			871,115				593,124			791,614
Income (loss) from operations		(9,773	)		24,451			56,850			78,055			79,994				62,979			108,604
Other income (expense) ⁽⁴⁾		(50	)		(358	)		13,345			3,176			2,936				3,540			(16	)
Loss on prepayment of debt		—			—			—			(31,385	)		(31,385	)			(31,385	)		—
Interest expense, net		(333	)		(13,733	)		(33,822	)		(48,301	)		(51,630	)			(35,659	)		(33,932	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit)		(10,156	)		10,360			36,373			1,545			(85	)			(525	)		74,656
Income tax expense (benefit)		(1,916	)		3,340			12,891			(1,370	)		(2,339	)			(4,493	)		24,367

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(8,240	)		7,020			23,482			2,915			2,254				3,968			50,289
Preferred interest and dividend requirement		(190	)		(1,798	)		(4,349	)		(1,656	)		—				(1,656	)		—

Net income (loss) applicable to common unitholders/ shareholders	$	(8,430	)	$	5,222		$	19,133		$	1,259		$	2,254		$	$	2,312		$	50,289

Basic earnings per share ⁽⁵⁾	$	(1.99	)

Diluted earnings per share ⁽⁵⁾	$	(1.99	)


Other financial data:
Total capital expenditures	$	4		$	1,458		$	2,023		$	5,529		$	5,529		$	$	4,669		$	5,055


	Historical										As adjusted As of September 30, 2008 ⁽⁷⁾
	As of December 31, 2005 ⁽⁶⁾		As of December 31, 2006		As of December 31, 2007			As of September 30, 2008
(dollars in thousands)	As of December 31, 2005 ⁽⁶⁾		As of December 31, 2006		As of December 31, 2007			As of September 30, 2008
Balance sheet data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	41,146	$	15,858	$	48,457		$	21,356
Working capital		153,187		189,384		296,190			336,056
Net property, plant and equipment		40,940		41,116		43,530			43,107
Total assets		527,362		545,760		709,554			749,590
Long-term debt and capital leases		286,688		286,546		575,856			562,027
Total partners’ capital (deficit) ⁽⁸⁾		71,812		98,174		(68,486	)		(33,331	)

(1)

Our consolidated statement of operations for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 includes 45 days of operating results of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries from the date of the MIM Acquisition on December 16, 2005 through its fiscal year end on January 31, 2006, and our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes eleven months of operating results of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries from February 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006, because Pipe Acquisition Limited’s January 31 fiscal year end was not changed to December 31 until September 30, 2006. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Factors affecting comparability of financial information — Difference in subsidiary fiscal year.”

(2)	Pro forma results for the year ended December 31, 2007 have not been adjusted for the acquisition of EVS.

(3)

Selling, general and administrative expense includes $12.0 million in Buy-out Transaction related expenses for the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005, approximately $5.5 million (£3.1 million) in bonus payments and applicable payroll taxes to certain Murray International Metals Limited employees prior to the MIM Acquisition for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and $2.5 million in Recapitalization Transaction related expenses and $2.0 million of compensation expense related to a one-time equity grant for the year ended December 31, 2007.

(4)	Other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes $13.2 million in foreign exchange gain on US dollar denominated debt held at our UK subsidiary with a functional currency of UK pounds.

(5)

In “Selected historical consolidated financial information of Edgen Murray II, L.P.” and our consolidated financial statements, to present per share/unit data for periods after January 31, 2005 and prior to the formation of Edgen Murray II, L.P. we convert the number of shares/units outstanding for the applicable period into an equivalent number of Edgen Murray II, L.P. common limited partnership units. Upon the Contribution, our capitalization will change and these per share/unit data will not be comparable. Therefore, for comparison purposes, to present the per share data in this summary table, for each respective period subsequent to February 1, 2005, we convert the number of shares/units outstanding for the applicable period into an equivalent number of Edgen Murray II, L.P. common limited partnership units and then convert such number of Edgen Murray II, L.P. common limited partnership units into an equivalent number of Edgen Murray Limited common shares using a ratio of common limited partnership units to common shares. Using this ratio, weighted average common shares/units reflects the effect of shares to be issued in connection with the Contribution. This ratio reflects that, as a result of the Contribution, the partners of Edgen Murray II, L.P. will receive common shares of Edgen Murray Limited representing an ownership interest in Edgen Murray Limited that is equivalent to their ownership interest in Edgen Murray II, L.P. For the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005, we present per share data on an actual basis without any conversion. We do not convert these data because the Buy-out Transaction on February 1, 2005 changed our basis of accounting. Therefore, these data would not be comparable to the subsequent periods even if we converted the number of shares to an equivalent number of Edgen Murray II, L.P. common limited partnership units or Edgen Murray Limited common shares.

(6)

Balance sheet data as December 31, 2005 includes the consolidated balance sheet of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries as of January 31, 2006 because Pipe Acquisition Limited’s January 31 fiscal year end was not changed to December 31 until September 30, 2006. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Factors affecting comparability of financial information — Difference in subsidiary fiscal year.”

(7)

The as adjusted balance sheet data as of September 30, 2008 is adjusted for this offering and the repayment of $ million of our first lien term loans with the expected net proceeds to us, assuming an initial public offering price of $ per common share (which is the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus). A $1.00 increase (decrease) in such assumed initial public offering price would increase (decrease) total partners’ capital (deficit) by $ million, assuming the number of common shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discount and commissions and estimated fees and expenses of this offering. See “Use of proceeds.”

(8)

Total partners’ capital (deficit) as of December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008 reflects reductions in partners’ capital in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007. Because the same principals of JCP controlled both Edgen/Murray, L.P. and Edgen Murray II, L.P., the entities were considered to be under common control for financial reporting purposes. As a result, fair value purchase accounting has not been applied, which means that we have not recorded the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including goodwill and other intangibles, at the date of the Recapitalization Transaction. Instead, we have maintained the historical carryover basis of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. SFAS 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141”), and we have recorded the purchase by Edgen Murray II, L.P. of the interests held by the partners of Edgen/Murray, L.P. as a distribution in the statement of partners’ capital (deficit). This has resulted in a negative balance for total partners’ capital (deficit).

Risk factors

An investment in our common shares involves a significant degree of risk, including the risks described below. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and the other information in this prospectus before deciding to invest in our common shares. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such case, you may lose all or part of your original investment.

Risks relating to our business

Volatility in the global energy infrastructure market, and in particular oil and natural gas prices and refining margins and the decline in oil and natural gas prices from recent historical highs, could reduce demand for our products, which could cause our sales to decrease.

Proceeds from the sale of products to the global energy infrastructure market constitute a significant portion of our sales. As a result, we depend upon the global energy infrastructure market, and in particular the oil and natural gas and refining industries, and upon the ability and willingness of industry participants to make capital expenditures to explore for, develop and produce, transport, process and refine oil and natural gas. The industry’s willingness to make these expenditures depends largely upon the availability of attractive drilling prospects and the prevailing view of future oil and natural gas prices and refinery margins and general economic conditions. Until recently, oil and natural gas prices have been at historic highs, which has led to increased capital expenditures by industry participants. Lower oil and natural gas prices may diminish expenditures for energy infrastructure and the demand for our steel products. Many factors affect the supply and demand for oil and natural gas and refined products and, therefore, influence our product prices, including:

•

the level of domestic and worldwide oil and natural gas production;

•

the level of domestic and worldwide supplies of, and demand for, oil, natural gas and refined products;

•

the expected cost of delivery of oil, natural gas and refined products;

•

the availability of attractive oil and natural gas fields for production, which may be affected by governmental action or environmental policy and which may restrict drilling prospects;

•

domestic and worldwide refinery overcapacity or undercapacity and utilization rates;

•

changes in the cost or availability of transportation infrastructure;

•

levels of drilling activity;

•

national, governmental and other political requirements, including the ability of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to set and maintain production levels and pricing;

•

the impact of political instability, terrorist activities or armed hostilities involving one or more oil and natural gas producing nations;

•

pricing and other actions taken by competitors that impact the market;

•

the failure to implement planned capital projects successfully or to realize the benefits expected for those projects;

•

changes in fuel specifications required by environmental and other laws, particularly with respect to oxygenates and sulfur content;

•

the cost of developing alternative energy sources;

•

domestic and foreign governmental regulations, especially environmental regulations, trade laws, commodities and derivatives trading regulations and tax policies;

•

the overall global economic environment; and

•

natural disasters, including hurricanes and other weather-related events.

Oil and natural gas prices and processing and refining margins have been and are expected to remain volatile. This volatility may cause our customers to change their strategies and expenditure levels. We have experienced in the past, and we may experience in the future, significant fluctuations in operating results based on these changes. In particular, such volatility in the oil, natural gas and refined products margins and markets more generally could adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

The prices we pay and charge for steel products, and the availability of steel products, may fluctuate due to a number of factors beyond our control, which could adversely affect our profit margins and operating results.

We purchase large quantities of steel products from our vendors. The prices we pay our vendors for these products, the prices we charge our customers for these products and the availability of these products may change depending on many factors outside of our control, including general global economic conditions, competition, consolidation of steel producers, cost and availability of raw materials (such as iron ore, coking coal and steel scrap) necessary to produce steel, production levels, labor costs, freight and shipping costs, import duties, tariffs and other trade restrictions, currency fluctuations and surcharges imposed by our vendors. If steel prices increase between the time we order steel products and the time of delivery of such products to us, our vendors may increase prices and impose surcharges on the ordered products. We seek to maintain our profit margins by attempting to increase the price of our products in response to increases in the prices we pay for our products. Demand for our products, the actions of our competitors, and other factors largely out of our control will influence whether, and to what extent, we can pass such steel cost increases and surcharges on to our customers. If we are unable to pass on higher costs to our customers, or if we are unable to do so in a timely manner, our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity could be materially affected. Alternatively, if the price of steel decreases significantly, we may have to reduce our product pricing. This may require us to write-down the value of inventory on hand that we purchased prior to the steel price decreases and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. In addition, our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity could be materially affected if our supply of products is delayed or curtailed due to any of the above factors.

We maintain an inventory of products for which we do not have firm customer orders, which could adversely affect our profit margins and operating results if prices or volumes decline.

Because we maintain substantial inventories of specialty steel products for which we do not have firm customer orders, there is a risk that we will be unable to sell our existing inventory at the volumes and prices we expect. For example, the value of our inventory could decline if the sales prices we are able to charge our customers decline. In that case, we may experience reduced margins or losses as we dispose of higher-cost products at reduced market prices.

As a distributor, our profitability, margins and cash flows can also be negatively affected by our inability to sell our inventory in a timely manner. Although we stock inventory based on historical usage patterns and expected demand, market conditions and/or inventory mix may affect the demand for our products. If we are unable to sell our inventory in a timely manner, we may incur costs, such as maintenance and storage costs and property taxes that may reduce our profitability, and we may be required to write-down the value of our slow moving inventory.

We rely upon our steel vendors to meet the required specifications of the steel we purchase from them and we may have unreimbursed losses arising from our vendors’ failure to meet such specifications.

We rely on our vendors to provide mill certifications that attest to the specifications and physical and chemical properties of the steel products purchased for resale, and generally, we do not undertake independent testing of such steel. We generally rely on our customers or assigned third party inspection services to notify us of any steel that does not conform to the specifications certified by the mill. We may be subject to customer claims and other damages in the event that steel purchased from our vendors is deemed not to meet quality specifications. Such damages could exceed any amounts that we are able to recover from our vendors or under our insurance policies.

Our business is sensitive to economic downturns, which could adversely affect our revenues, profitability and cash flows.

Aspects of our business, including demand for our products, are dependent on, among other things, the state of the global economy. Our business may be affected by the recent global economic downturn, including in the following ways:

•

Our customers may reduce or eliminate capital expenditures as a result of reduced demand from their customers.

•

Our customers may not be able to obtain sufficient funding for their capital projects at a reasonable cost as a result of tightening credit markets, which may result in delayed and/or cancelled projects and/or maintenance expenditures.

•

Our customers may not be able to make their payments to us in a timely manner or at all as a result of declines in their cash flows or available credit.

•

We may experience supply shortages for certain products if our vendors reduce production as a result of reduced demand for their products.

•

We may experience tighter credit terms from our vendors, which could increase our working capital needs and potentially reduce our liquidity.

•

The value of our inventory could decline if the sales prices we are able to charge our customers decline.

As a result of these and other factors, economic downturns such as the one we are currently experiencing may adversely affect our revenues, profitability and cash flows.

Loss of key vendors or reduced product availability could decrease our sales and earnings.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our ten largest vendors accounted for approximately 46% of our total purchases and our single largest vendor accounted for approximately 9% of our total purchases. Consistent with industry practice, we do not have contracts with most of our vendors. Therefore, most of our vendors have the ability to terminate their relationships with us at any time. The loss of any of these vendors could result in a decrease in our sales, operating results and earnings by decreasing the availability, and/or increasing the prices, of products we distribute. This could limit our ability to satisfy our customers’ product needs. Reduced product availability could also put us at a competitive disadvantage.

Significant competition from a number of companies could reduce our market share and have an adverse effect on our selling prices and sales volume.

We operate in a highly competitive industry and compete against a number of companies, some of which have significantly greater financial, technological and marketing resources than we do. We believe that our ability to compete depends on having access to a broad range of high-performance specialty products, ability to deliver on a quick-response basis or in our customers’ desired timeframe, competitive pricing and superior customer service and support. We may be unable to compete successfully with respect to these or other factors. If we are unsuccessful, we could lose market share to our competitors. Moreover, actions by our competitors could have an adverse effect on our selling prices and sales volume. To compete for customers, we may lower prices or offer increased services at a higher cost to us, which could reduce our sales and earnings.

The development of alternatives to steel product distributors in the supply chain in the industries in which we operate could cause a decrease in our sales and operating results and limit our ability to grow our business.

If our customers were to decide to develop the capability to purchase products directly from manufacturers, it could negatively affect our sales and earnings. Our vendors also could expand their own local sales force and inventory stocking capabilities and sell more products directly to our customers. Customers could purchase from our vendors directly in situations where large orders are being placed and where inventory and logistics support planning are not necessary to the delivery. These or other actions that remove us from, or limit our role in, the distribution chain, may harm our competitive position in the marketplace and reduce our sales and earnings.

Increases in customer, manufacturer and distributor inventory levels could reduce our sales and profit.

Customer, manufacturer and distributor inventory levels of specialty steel pipe, pipe components and high-grade structural steel products can change significantly from period to period. Increases in our customers’ inventory levels could cause customers to utilize existing inventory rather than purchase new products through us. Such a reduction in purchases by our customers would likely reduce our sales volume and overall profitability.

Increased inventory levels by manufacturers or other distributors could cause an oversupply of steel products in our markets and could reduce the prices that we are able to charge for our products. Reduced prices, in turn, would likely reduce our margins and overall profitability.

We rely on our information technology systems to manage numerous aspects of our business and customer and vendor relationships and a disruption of these systems could adversely affect our business.

We depend on our information technology (IT) systems to manage numerous aspects of our business transactions and provide analytical information to management. Our IT systems allow us to efficiently purchase products from our vendors, ship products to our customers on a timely basis, maintain cost-effective operations and provide superior service to our customers. Our IT systems are an essential component of our business and growth strategies, and a serious disruption to our IT systems could significantly limit our ability to manage and operate our business efficiently. These systems are vulnerable to, among other things, damage and interruption from power loss or natural disasters, computer system and network failures, loss of telecommunications services, operator negligence, physical and electronic loss of data, security breaches and computer viruses. Any disruption could cause our business and competitive position to suffer and cause our operating results to be reduced.

Loss of third-party transportation providers upon which we depend or conditions negatively affecting the transportation industry could increase our costs or cause a disruption in our operations.

We depend upon third-party transportation providers for delivery of products to our customers. Strikes, slowdowns, transportation disruptions or other conditions in the transportation industry, including shortages of truck drivers, disruptions in rail service, increases in fuel prices and adverse weather conditions, could increase our costs and disrupt our operations and our ability to service our customers on a timely basis. We cannot predict whether or to what extent recent increases or possible increases in fuel prices may impact our costs or cause a disruption in our operations going forward.

Our ten largest customers account for a substantial portion of our sales and profits, and the loss of these customers could result in materially decreased sales and profits.

Our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 23% of our overall sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. We may lose a customer for any number of reasons, including, but not limited to, as a result of a merger or acquisition, the selection of another provider of high-grade steel products, business failure or bankruptcy of the customer or dissatisfaction with our performance. Consistent with industry practice, we do not have contracts with most of our major customers. Our customers with whom we do not have contracts have the ability to terminate their relationships with us at any time. Moreover, to the extent we have contracts with our major customers, these contracts generally may be discontinued with 30 days notice by either party, are not exclusive and do not require minimum levels of purchases. We may not retain long-term relationships or secure renewals of short-term relationships with our major customers in the future.

Changes in the payment terms we receive from our vendors could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.

The payment terms we receive from our vendors are dependent on several factors, including, but not limited to, our payment history with the vendor, the vendor’s credit granting policies, contractual provisions, our credit profile, industry conditions, our recent operating results, financial position and cash flows and the vendor’s ability to obtain credit insurance on amounts that we owe them. Adverse changes in any of these factors, certain of which may not be wholly in our control, may induce our vendors to shorten the payment terms of their invoices, particularly given our high level of outstanding indebtedness. Given the large amounts and volume of our purchases from vendors, a change in payment terms may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to make payments to our vendors, and consequently may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may need additional capital in the future and it may not be available on acceptable terms.

We may require more capital in the future to:

•

fund our operations;

•

finance investments in equipment and infrastructure needed to maintain and expand our distribution capabilities;

•

enhance and expand the range of products we offer;

•

respond to potential strategic opportunities, such as investments, acquisitions and expansion; and

•

pay down our debt.

We cannot assure you that additional financing will be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. The terms of available financing may place limits on our financial and operating flexibility. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be forced to reduce our operations or delay, limit or abandon expansion opportunities. Moreover, even if we are able to continue our operations, the failure to obtain additional financing could reduce our competitiveness.

We are a holding company with no revenue generating operations of our own. We depend on the performance of our subsidiaries and their ability to make distributions to us.

We are a holding company with no business operations, sources of income or assets of our own other than our ownership interests in our subsidiaries. Because all our operations are conducted by our subsidiaries, our cash flow and our ability to repay debt that we may incur after this offering and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders are dependent upon cash dividends and distributions or other transfers from our subsidiaries. Payment of dividends, distributions, loans or advances by our subsidiaries to us are subject to restrictions imposed by our revolving credit agreement and our first and second lien term loans. Our revolving credit agreement also limits our ability to allocate cash flow or resources from Edgen Murray Corporation and its related group of subsidiaries to Edgen Murray Cayman Corporation and its related group of subsidiaries and vice versa. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial conditions and results of operations — Liquidity and capital resources — Debt”. In addition, payments or distributions from our subsidiaries could be subject to restrictions on dividends or repatriation of earnings, monetary transfer restrictions and foreign currency exchange regulations in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate. In particular, Edgen Murray Europe Limited, our principal UK subsidiary, may under English law only pay dividends out of distributable profits.

Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities. Any right that we have to receive any assets of or distributions from any of our subsidiaries upon the bankruptcy, dissolution, liquidation or reorganization of any such subsidiary, or to realize proceeds from the sale of their assets, will be junior to the claims of that subsidiary’s creditors, including trade creditors and holders of debt issued by that subsidiary.

We have substantial indebtedness and may be unable to service our debt. Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial position, limit our available cash and our access to additional capital and prevent us from growing our business.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of September 30, 2008, our total indebtedness, including capital leases, was approximately $562.0 million. If additional indebtedness is incurred, the risks described below could increase. The level of our indebtedness could have important consequences to us, including the following:

•

a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations will be dedicated to debt service and may not be available for other purposes;

•

limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

•

limiting our ability to obtain financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures and general company purposes, including acquisitions, and impeding our ability to secure favorable lease terms;

•

making us more vulnerable to economic downturns and limiting our ability to withstand competitive pressures; and

•

placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less indebtedness.

In addition, we are subject to covenants contained in agreements governing our indebtedness. These covenants include limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens, the payment of dividends and distributions, the making of investments, loans and advances, transactions with affiliates and mergers and the sale of

assets. They also include a maximum leverage ratio and, under certain circumstances, a fixed charge coverage ratio that we must satisfy each quarter. The maximum leverage ratio was 5.50 to 1.00 through September 30, 2008 and is 5.00 to 1.00 through September 30, 2009 and 4.50 to 1.00 thereafter. For this purpose, the leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of net debt (total debt less cash on hand) to earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization, and income taxes, subject to certain specific adjustments. As of September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with these covenants since our leverage ratio was 3.49 and the fixed charge coverage ratio did not apply. Any failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default. Upon a default, unless waived, the applicable lenders would have all remedies available to a secured lender, and could elect to terminate their commitments, cease making further loans, institute foreclosure proceedings against our assets and force us into bankruptcy or liquidation. In addition, a default under one of our debt agreements could trigger cross defaults under other agreements and may permit acceleration of our other indebtedness. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we cannot be certain that we will have sufficient funds available to pay the accelerated indebtedness or that we will have the ability to refinance the accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to us or at all. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Liquidity and capital resources — Debt.”

Some of our indebtedness is subject to floating interest rates, which would result in our interest expense increasing if interest rates rise.

Borrowings under our revolving credit agreement and first and second lien term loans bear interest at variable rates. Changes in economic conditions could result in higher interest rates, thereby increasing our interest expense and reducing funds available for operations or other purposes. Based on the amount of variable rate debt outstanding as of September 30, 2008 of $ million, as adjusted to reflect the application of the expected net proceeds to us from this offering to repay a portion of our first lien term loans, a hypothetical 1% increase in variable interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by $ million. The actual effect of a 1% increase could be more or less depending upon the actual amount of debt outstanding at the time. Accordingly, we may experience economic losses and a negative impact on earnings as a result of interest rate fluctuations. Although we may use derivative instruments from time to time to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations in some cases, we may not elect or have the ability to implement hedges or, if we do implement them, they may not achieve the desired effect. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk” and “Use of proceeds.”

To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. An inability to service our indebtedness could lead to a default under our credit facilities, which may result in an acceleration of our indebtedness.

To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to pay interest and principal on our indebtedness and to satisfy our other debt obligations will depend upon our future operating performance and the availability of refinancing indebtedness, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. Beginning in 2009, our subsidiaries’ term loans require mandatory annual principal prepayments from excess cash flow, as defined by the term loan agreements, for the previous fiscal year.

Our future cash flow may not be sufficient to meet our obligations and commitments. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our indebtedness and to meet our other commitments, we will be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as refinancing or restructuring our indebtedness, selling material assets or operations or seeking to raise additional debt or equity capital. These actions may not be effected on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms or at all, and these actions may not enable us to continue to satisfy our capital requirements. In addition, our existing or future debt agreements may contain restrictive covenants prohibiting us from adopting any of these alternatives. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our indebtedness. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Liquidity and capital resources” and “Use of Proceeds.”

The agreements governing our indebtedness restrict our ability to engage in certain business transactions.

The agreements governing our indebtedness restrict our ability to, among other things, engage in the following actions, subject to limited exceptions:

•

incur or guarantee additional debt;

•

declare or pay dividends to holders of our common shares;

•

make investments;

•

incur liens or permit them to exist;

•

enter into transactions with affiliates;

•

make material changes in the nature or conduct of our business;

•

merge or consolidate with, or sell substantially all of our assets to, other companies;

•

make capital expenditures; and

•

transfer or sell assets.

Our credit agreements also contain other covenants that are typical for credit agreements of their size, type and tenor, such as requirements that we meet a maximum leverage ratio and, under certain circumstances, a fixed charge coverage ratio. Our ability to make additional borrowings under our revolving credit agreement depends upon satisfaction of these covenants. Our ability to comply with these covenants and requirements may be affected by events beyond our control.

Our failure to comply with obligations under our credit facilities could result in an event of default under the facilities. A default, if not cured or waived, could prohibit us from obtaining further loans under our credit facilities and permit our lenders to accelerate payment of their loans. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we cannot be certain that we will have funds available to pay the accelerated indebtedness or that we will have the ability to refinance the accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to us or at all. If we could not repay or refinance the accelerated indebtedness, we could be insolvent and could seek to file for bankruptcy protection. Any such default, acceleration or insolvency would likely have a material adverse effect on the market value of our common shares.

Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and under Bermuda law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our shareholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our shareholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions in our bye-laws that will become effective upon the completion of this offering may delay or prevent an acquisition of us or a change in our management. In addition, by making it more difficult for shareholders to replace members of our board of directors, these provisions also may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our shareholders to replace or remove our current management because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team. These provisions include:

•

the ability of our board of directors to issue undesignated shares without shareholder approval, which could be used to institute a “poison pill” that would work to dilute the share ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of directors;

•

a classified board of directors;

•

limitations on the removal of directors and the filling of vacancies on the board of directors;

•

prohibition of shareholder action by written consent;

•

advance notice requirements for director nominations and other shareholder proposals; and

•

supermajority voting requirements for amendments to our bye-laws and in respect of certain business combinations.

In addition, the foregoing factors may prevent or delay our acquisition by a third party, even though such transaction may be in the best interests of our shareholders. See “Description of our share capital—Anti-takeover provisions of our memorandum of association, our bye-laws and Bermuda law.”

Concentration of ownership among our existing executives, directors and principal shareholders may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.

After giving effect to the completion of the Contribution and this offering, funds managed by JCP will beneficially own approximately % of our outstanding common shares and our executives, directors and principal shareholders will beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately % of our outstanding common shares. In addition, JCP will be entitled to have a representative attend meetings of our board of directors as a non-voting observer so long as certain ownership thresholds are met. Accordingly, these shareholders may be able to exercise influence over our business policies and affairs, including the composition of our board of directors and any action requiring the approval of our shareholders, such as the adoption of amendments to our memorandum of association and the approval of mergers, sales of substantially all of our assets and other significant transactions. We do not expect that there will be any agreement among the funds managed by JCP and the executives, directors and principal shareholders to vote their shares in any particular manner. However, this concentration of ownership may limit your ability to influence corporate actions. The concentration of ownership may also delay, defer or even prevent a change in control of our company and may make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these shareholders. We cannot assure you that the interests of these shareholders will not conflict with your interests. For additional information regarding the share ownership of, and our relationships with, the shareholders, you should read the information under the headings “Principal and selling shareholders” and “Certain relationships and related person transactions.”

Risks generally associated with acquisitions, including identifying and integrating future acquisitions, could adversely affect our business.

A key element of our growth strategy has been and is expected to continue to be the pursuit of acquisitions of other businesses that either expand or complement our global platform. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be able to identify additional acquisitions or that we would realize any anticipated benefits from such acquisitions. Integrating businesses involves a number of special risks, including the possibility that management may be distracted from regular business concerns by the need to integrate operations, unforeseen difficulties in integrating operations and systems, problems concerning assimilating and retaining the employees of the acquired business, accounting issues that arise in connection with the acquisition, challenges in retaining customers and potentially adverse short-term effects on operating results. Acquired businesses may require a greater amount of capital, infrastructure or other spending than we anticipate. In addition, we may incur debt to finance future acquisitions, which could increase our leverage. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in consummating future acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we are unable to successfully complete and integrate strategic acquisitions in a timely manner, our growth strategy could be adversely impacted.

War, other armed conflicts or terrorist attacks could result in a material adverse effect on our business.

The continuing unrest in Iraq, tension with regard to North Korea and Iran, as well as terrorist attacks have significantly increased political and economic instability in some of the geographic areas in which we operate and could spread to other such areas. Our operations in the Middle East could be adversely affected by post-war conditions in Iraq if armed hostilities, acts of terrorism or other unrest persist. Acts of terrorism and threats of armed conflict elsewhere in the Middle East and in or around various other areas in which we operate, such as the Caspian Sea region, West Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia, could also limit or disrupt our markets and operations. Further hostilities or additional acts of terrorism in these regions could result in the evacuation of personnel, cancellation of contracts or the loss of personnel or assets. Armed conflicts, terrorism and their effects on us or our markets could significantly affect our business in the future.

Disruptions in the political and economic conditions of the countries in which we operate could adversely affect our business.

Our operations are subject to the following risks, among others, associated with the political and economic conditions of the countries in which we operate:

•

foreign currency fluctuations and devaluations;

•

local economic conditions;

•

restrictions on currency repatriation;

•

restrictions on access to markets for periods of time;

•

political instability;

•

unfavorable government policies disrupting purchasing and distribution capabilities;

•

war and civil disturbances; and

•

terrorist attacks.

With respect to our potential exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 13% of our revenues and 11% of our total assets were denominated in UK pounds, our functional currency in the United Kingdom. As a result, a material decrease in the value of the UK pound relative to the US dollar may negatively impact our revenues, cash flows and net income. Each one percentage point change in the value of the UK pound relative to the US dollar for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 would have impacted our revenues by approximately $1.2 million.

Although we are not subject to currency controls in the countries where we currently operate, any future currency controls implemented by local monetary authorities in these countries could affect our business or financial results.

We are also subject to other risks, including foreign monetary and tax policies, expropriation, nationalization and nullification or modification of contracts. Additionally, our ability to compete in international markets may be adversely affected by foreign governmental regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or by regulations requiring foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Furthermore, our subsidiaries may face governmentally imposed restrictions from time to time on their ability to transfer funds to us.

Hurricanes or other adverse weather events could negatively affect our local economies or disrupt our operations, which could have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations.

Our market areas in the southeastern United States are susceptible to hurricanes. Similarly our market areas in the Asia/Pacific geographic market are susceptible to tropical storms, also known as typhoons. Such weather events can disrupt our operations, result in damage to our properties and negatively affect the local economies in which we operate. Additionally, we may experience communication disruptions with our customers, vendors and employees. In 2008 and 2005, Hurricanes Gustav, Ike, Katrina and Rita struck the Gulf Coast of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Texas and caused extensive and catastrophic physical damage to those market areas. As a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, our Louisiana and Texas locations sustained minor physical damage and were closed for a minimal number of days to secure our employees. Additionally, our sales order backlog and shipments experienced a temporary decline immediately following the hurricanes.

We cannot predict whether, or to what extent, damage caused by future hurricanes and tropical storms will affect our operations or the economies in those market areas. Such weather events could result in a disruption of our purchasing and distribution capabilities, an interruption of our business that exceeds our insurance coverage, our inability to collect from customers and increased operating costs. Our business or results of operations may be adversely affected by these and other negative effects of hurricanes or other adverse weather events.

If we are unable to retain our key management personnel, our growth and future success may be impaired and our financial condition could suffer as a result.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of senior management, certain of whom would be difficult to replace. The departure of any of the members of our senior management could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on any of the members of our senior management. We cannot assure you that the services of our senior management will continue to be available to us. For additional information regarding our management, see “Management.”

We might be unable to employ and retain a sufficient number of sales and customer service personnel.

Many of our customers require products that are complex, highly engineered or able to perform in harsh conditions. We believe that our success depends upon our ability to employ and retain qualified sales and service personnel with the ability to understand our products and provide tailored product solutions to our customer base. A significant increase in the wages paid by competing employers could result in a reduction of our skilled labor force, increases in the wage rates that we must pay or both. If either of these events were to occur, our cost structure could increase and our growth potential could be impaired.

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations relating to hazardous materials, substances and waste used in or resulting from our operations. Liabilities or claims with respect to environmental matters could have a significant negative impact on our business.

As with other companies engaged in like businesses, the nature of our operations exposes us to the risk of liabilities or claims with respect to environmental matters, including those relating to the disposal and release of hazardous substances. Such liabilities or claims, if incurred, could be material. Environmental regulations are comprehensive, complex and frequently changing. Some of these laws and regulations are subject to varying and conflicting interpretations. We also may be subject from time to time to administrative or judicial proceedings or investigations brought by private parties or government agencies with respect to environmental matters. Failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, and issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations. In addition, claims for damages to persons or property may result from environmental and other impacts of our operations

We are subject to various employee safety and health regulations, which could subject us to significant liabilities and compliance expenditures.

Our operations are governed by laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and worker health which, among other things, regulate employee exposure to hazardous chemicals in the workplace. Employee safety and health regulations are comprehensive, complex and frequently changing. Some of these laws and regulations are subject to varying and conflicting interpretations. We may be subject from time to time to administrative or judicial proceedings or investigations brought by private parties or government agencies with respect to employee safety and health issues.

We will incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.

As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules of the SEC and the NYSE regulate corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect that compliance with these public company requirements will increase our costs and make some activities more time consuming. For example, we will create new board committees and adopt new internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, we will incur additional expenses associated with our SEC reporting requirements. We also expect that it could be difficult and will be significantly more expensive to obtain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as officers. Advocacy efforts by shareholders and third parties may also prompt even more changes in governance and reporting requirements. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Our internal controls over financial reporting may not be effective and our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to opine as to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, which could have a significant and adverse effect on our business and reputation.

We are evaluating our internal controls over financial reporting in order to allow management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, the design and operational effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, and rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder, which we refer to as “Section 404.” We are in the process of documenting and initiating tests of our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, which requires

annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. During the course of our testing, we may identify deficiencies which we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. We expect that we will be required to comply with the requirements of Section 404 for our fiscal year. In addition, if we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. We cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and any remediation actions or the impact of the same on our operations. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be able to opine as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and we may be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC. As a result, there could be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. In addition, we may be required to incur costs in improving our internal control system and the hiring of additional personnel. Any such action could negatively affect our results of operations.

We could be subject to personal injury, property damage, product liability and environmental claims involving allegedly defective products that we distribute.

The products we distribute are often used in potentially hazardous applications that could result in death, personal injury, property damage, environmental damage, loss of production, punitive damages and consequential damages. Actual or claimed defects in the products we distribute may result in us being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting potentially large claims, despite our not having manufactured the products alleged to have been defective. Furthermore, applicable law may render us liable for damages regardless of negligence or fault on our part. In particular, certain environmental laws provide for joint and several and strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of hazardous substances. Some of these risks are reduced because we are a distributor of products produced by third-party manufacturers, and so, in certain circumstances we may have third-party warranty or other claims against the manufacturer of products alleged to have been defective. However, we may give warranty terms that exceed that of the manufacturer or the manufacturer may be financially unable to cover the losses and damages caused by defective products. There also is no assurance that our insurance coverage would be adequate to cover the underlying claims, as our insurance does not provide coverage for all liabilities (including liability for certain events involving pollution).

We may not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities.

In the ordinary course of business, we may be subject to various product and non-product related claims, laws and administrative proceedings seeking damages, or other remedies arising out of our commercial operations. We maintain insurance to cover our exposure for most claims and losses. However, our insurance is subject to various self-retentions and deductibles, may be inadequate or unavailable to fully protect us, and may be canceled or otherwise terminated. We face the following additional risks under our insurance coverage:

•

we may not be able to continue to obtain insurance on commercially reasonable terms or at all;

•

we may be faced with types of liabilities that will not be covered by our insurance, such as damages from environmental contamination or terrorist attacks, and that will exceed any amounts we have reserved for such matters;

•

the amount of any liabilities may exceed our policy limits and any amounts we have reserved for such matters; and

•

we may incur losses from interruption of our business that exceed our insurance coverage.

Even a partially uninsured claim, if successful and of significant size, could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Further, even if we successfully defend ourselves against this type of claim, we could be forced to spend a substantial amount of money in litigation expenses, our management could be required to spend valuable time in the defense against these claims and our reputation could suffer, any of which could harm our business.

We may become subject to taxation in Bermuda, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have received written assurances from the Bermuda Minister of Finance under The Exempted Undertaking Tax Protection Act 1966 of Bermuda to the effect that if there is enacted in Bermuda any legislation imposing tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of such tax shall not be applicable to us or any of our operations or common shares, debentures or other obligations until March 28, 2016, except insofar as such tax applies to persons ordinarily resident in Bermuda or is payable by us in respect of real property owned or leased in Bermuda. We cannot assure you that future Bermuda Ministers of Finance will honor that assurance, which is not legally binding, or that after such date we would not be subject to any such tax. If we were to become subject to taxation in Bermuda, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks relating to our common shares and this offering

No public market existed for our common shares prior to the offering and there can be no assurance that an active trading market will develop for the common shares on the NYSE.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common shares, and you could not buy or sell the common shares publicly. We have applied to have the common shares quoted on the NYSE. There can be no assurance that an active trading market will develop for the common shares on the NYSE. The absence of an active trading market on the NYSE could adversely affect the market price of the common shares. The underwriters will determine the offer price by negotiation, and this price may not be the price at which the common shares will trade due to the fact that the offer price may be based on factors that may not be indicative of future performance.

Market volatility may cause the price of our common shares and the value of your investment to decline, and you may not be able to resell your common shares at or above the initial public offering price.

Our common share price is likely to be volatile. The initial public offering price may not be indicative of prices that will subsequently prevail in the market. Therefore, if you purchase common shares in this offering, you may not be able to resell your common shares at or above the initial public offering price. In addition to other risk factors described in this section, the following factors may have a significant impact on the market price of our common shares:

•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our results of operations;

•

changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;

•

sales of large blocks of our common shares; and

•

sales of our common shares by our officers, directors and significant shareholders.

Your rights as a shareholder will be governed by Bermuda law, and Bermuda law differs from the laws in effect in the United States and may afford less protection to shareholders.

Our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a state of the United States. As a Bermuda company, we are governed by the Bermuda Companies Act 1981, as amended (the “Companies Act”). The Companies Act differs in some material respects from laws generally applicable to US corporations and shareholders, including provisions relating to interested directors, mergers, amalgamations and acquisitions, takeovers, shareholder lawsuits and indemnification of directors. See “Description of our share capital.”

Generally, the duties of directors and officers of a Bermuda company are owed to the company only. Shareholders of Bermuda companies generally do not have rights to take action against directors or officers of the company and may only do so in limited circumstances. In addition, our bye-laws contain a broad waiver by our shareholders of any claim or right of action, both individually and on our behalf, against any of our officers or directors. The waiver applies to any action taken by an officer or director, or the failure of an officer or director to take any action, in the performance of his or her duties, except with respect to any matter involving any fraud or dishonesty on the part of the officer or director or to recover any gain, personal profit or advantage to which such officer or director is not legally entitled. This waiver limits the right of shareholders to assert claims against our officers and directors unless the act or failure to act involves fraud or dishonesty. For a description of these restrictions, see “Description of our share

capital.” Additionally, the rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Bermuda law are not as clearly established as under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in jurisdictions in the United States, particularly the State of Delaware. Therefore, our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a state within the United States.

You may have difficulty in effecting service of process in the United States or enforcing judgments obtained in the United States.

We are organized under the laws of Bermuda, and a significant portion of our assets are located outside the United States. It may not be possible to enforce court judgments obtained in the United States against us in Bermuda or in countries, other than the United States, where we have assets based on the civil liability or penal provisions of the federal or state securities laws of the United States. In addition, there is some doubt as to whether the courts of Bermuda and other countries would recognize or enforce judgments of US courts obtained against us or our directors or officers based on the civil liability or penal provisions of the federal or state securities laws of the United States or would hear actions against us or those persons based on those laws. The United States and Bermuda do not currently have a treaty providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any federal or state court in the United States based on civil liability, whether or not based solely on US federal or state securities laws, would not automatically be enforceable in Bermuda. Similarly, those judgments may not be enforceable in countries, other than the United States, where we have assets.

Investors purchasing our common shares will suffer immediate and substantial dilution.

The initial public offering price for our common shares will be substantially higher than the equivalent net tangible book value per share of our common shares immediately after this offering. If you purchase common shares in this offering, you will incur substantial and immediate dilution in the net tangible book value of your investment. Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the number of common shares then outstanding. See “Dilution” for a calculation of the extent to which your investment will be diluted.

Common shares eligible for public sale after this offering could adversely affect the price of our common shares.

The market price for our common shares could decline as a result of sales by our existing shareholders or management of common shares in the public market after this offering, or the perceptions that these sales could occur. These sales could materially impair our future ability to raise capital through offerings of our common shares. The lock-up agreements relating to our shareholders provide that they may not dispose of common shares for 180 days following the date of this prospectus. For more information on our principal shareholders, their lock-up agreements and their shares eligible for future sale, see “Principal and selling shareholders,” “Shares eligible for future sale” and “Underwriting.”

We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common shares. We are prohibited under our term loan credit agreements, and restricted under our revolving credit agreement, from paying dividends or distributions on our common shares. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations— Liquidity and capital resources.” In addition, under Bermuda law Edgen Murray Limited can only pay dividends or distributions if it meets certain solvency tests. See “Dividend policy.”

Third party industry reports and data cited in this prospectus may become outdated, obsolete or inaccurate.

The industry and market data used throughout this prospectus are based on third party publications and data sources. We did not commission any of these publications or the collection of any of this data. Third party industry publications and data sources generally state that they have obtained information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information. Although we believe that the sources cited in this prospectus are reliable, we have not independently verified the accuracy of any such third party information. Furthermore, facts, statistics and estimates upon which these publications and data are based and to which we cite in this prospectus may become outdated, obsolete or inaccurate as underlying facts or market conditions change.

Special note regarding forward-looking statements

This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “project,” “intend” and similar expressions. These statements include, among others, statements regarding our expected business outlook, anticipated financial and operating results, our business strategy and means to implement the strategy, our objectives, the amount and timing of capital expenditures, the likelihood of our success in expanding our business, financing plans, budgets, working capital needs and sources of liquidity.

Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of performance. These statements are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions, which, in turn, are based on currently available information. Important assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements include, among others, assumptions regarding demand for our products, the expansion of product offerings geographically or through new applications, the timing and cost of planned capital expenditures, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. These assumptions could prove inaccurate. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict or quantify. Therefore, actual results could differ materially and adversely from these forward-looking statements as a result of a wide variety of factors, including all the risks discussed in “Risk factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.

Accordingly, we urge you to read this prospectus completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we plan or expect. In addition, these forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus. Except for our ongoing obligation to disclose material information as required by federal securities laws, we do not intend to update you concerning any future revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this prospectus.

Use of proceeds

We estimate that our net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $ million, after deducting the underwriting discount and commissions and the estimated fees and expenses of this offering (assuming an initial public offering price of $ per common share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus). We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of our common shares by the selling shareholders, a group which includes certain of our officers and directors and affiliates of Jefferies & Company, Inc., an underwriter in this offering.

We intend to use all of the net proceeds to us from this offering for the repayment of a portion of our first lien term loans.

As of September 30, 2008, $419.7 million was outstanding under our first lien term loans. The first lien term loans bear interest at a floating rate equal to the base rate, which is defined as the higher of the applicable prime rate or 0.50% above the federal funds effective rate, in effect from time to time plus 1.75%, or at the reserve adjusted eurodollar rate in effect from time to time plus 2.75%. As of September 30, 2008, the weighted average interest rate was 5.55%, without giving effect to any interest rate swaps. The first lien term loans mature on May 11, 2014. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Liquidity and capital resources — Debt.” An affiliate of Jefferies & Company, Inc., an underwriter in this offering, is a lender under our first lien term loans and, as a result, will receive approximately % of the net proceeds of this offering. See “Underwriting.”

Dividend policy

Under Bermuda law, a company may declare and pay dividends from time to time unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that the company is or would, after the payment, be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or that the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than the aggregate of its liabilities and issued share capital and share premium accounts.

To date, we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common shares, although in the future we may do so. Any such future determination relating to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to Bermuda law, and will depend on then existing conditions, including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.

Our ability to declare and pay dividends is restricted by covenants in our revolving credit agreement and our first and second lien term loans. Our ability to declare and pay dividends is also dependent upon cash dividends and distributions or other transfers from our subsidiaries to us because we are a holding company with no business operations, sources of income or assets of our own other than our ownership interests in our subsidiaries. Payment of dividends, distributions, loans or advances by our subsidiaries to us are subject to restrictions imposed by the debt instruments of our subsidiaries. In addition, payments or distributions from our subsidiaries could be subject to restrictions on dividends or repatriation of earnings, monetary transfer restrictions and foreign currency exchange regulations in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate. As a result, you should not rely on an investment in our common shares if you require dividend income. You will need to sell your common shares to realize a return on your investment, and you may not be able to sell your common shares at or above the price you paid for them.

Capitalization

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of September 30, 2008:

•

on an actual basis; and

•

on an as adjusted basis, to give effect to the Contribution, the sale by us of approximately common shares in this offering at an assumed public offering price per share of $ (the midpoint of the range on the cover page of this prospectus), and the application of our expected net proceeds of this offering as described under “Use of proceeds.”

You should read the information in this table in conjunction with “Use of proceeds,” “Certain relationships and related person transactions,” “Selected historical consolidated financial information of Edgen Murray II, L.P.,” “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes to those statements contained elsewhere in this prospectus.


	As of September 30, 2008
(dollars in thousands)	Actual			As adjusted ⁽¹⁾
Debt:
Revolving credit agreement ⁽²⁾	$	42,436		$
First lien term loans ⁽²⁾		419,687
Second lien term loan ⁽²⁾		75,000
Newbridge capital lease ⁽²⁾		20,406
Various other notes and capital leases		4,498

Total debt, including current portion		562,027
Partners’ capital (deficit)/shareholders’ equity (deficit):
Edgen Murray II, L.P.
Common partnership units — Edgen Murray II, L.P., $1,000 per unit, 209,528 units were issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008, and no units are issued and outstanding on an as adjusted basis ⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		(33,331	)		—
Edgen Murray Limited
Common shares, $1.00 par value per share and shares are authorized and shares are assumed to be issued and outstanding on an as adjusted basis ⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		—

Total partners’ capital (deficit)/shareholders’ equity (deficit)		(33,331	)

Total capitalization	$	528,696		$

(1)

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (the midpoint of the range on the cover page of this prospectus) would increase (decrease) the amount of first lien term loan debt repaid, total partners’ capital (deficit)/shareholders’ equity (deficit) and total capitalization by approximately $ million, assuming the number of common shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discount and commissions and estimated fees and expenses of this offering.

(2)	See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation — Liquidity and capital resources — Debt” for a description of our revolving credit agreement, first lien term loans, second lien term loan and Newbridge capital lease.

(3)

As a result of the Contribution, the equity holders of Edgen Murray II, L.P. will receive common shares of Edgen Murray Limited representing an ownership interest in Edgen Murray Limited that is equivalent to their ownership interest in Edgen Murray II, L.P. and the Edgen Murray II, L.P. common partnership units will cease to represent an ownership interest in our business.

(4)	The actual column excludes 11,050 common partnership units issuable upon exercise of currently outstanding options to purchase our common partnership units. The as adjusted column excludes common shares issuable upon exercise of currently outstanding options to purchase our common shares.

Dilution

If you invest in our common shares, your interest will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per common share and the net tangible book value per common share immediately after this offering. Net tangible book value per share represents the total tangible assets less total liabilities divided by the number of common shares outstanding as of September 30, 2008.

As of September 30, 2008, our net tangible book value was a deficit of approximately $ per common share based on common shares outstanding. After giving effect to the Contribution, the sale by us of approximately common shares in this offering at an assumed public offering price per share of $ (the midpoint of the range on the cover page of this prospectus), and the application of our expected net proceeds of this offering, our as adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2008 would have been approximately $ million, or $ per common share. This would represent an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $ per share to existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of $ per common share to investors purchasing our common shares in this offering. The following table illustrates this dilution:


		Per common share
Assumed initial public offering price		$
Net tangible book value as of September 30, 2008		$
Increase in net tangible book value attributable to this offering		$

As adjusted net tangible book value after this offering		$

A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share would increase or decrease the as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering by $ per share and would increase or decrease the dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per share to investors in this offering by $ per share. This calculation assumes that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth of the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and reflects the deduction of the estimated underwriting discount and commissions and estimated fees and expenses of this offering.

The following table shows, on the as adjusted basis described above as of September 30, 2008, the differences in the number of common shares purchased from us, the total cash consideration paid and the average price per common share paid by our existing shareholders and by new investors (assuming an initial public offering price per share of $ per common share, which is the midpoint of the range on the cover page of this prospectus).


	Common shares purchased			Total consideration			Average price per common share
(dollars in millions)	Number	Percent		Amount	Percent		Average price per common share
Existing shareholders			%			%	$
New investors			%			%	$

Total		100	%		100	%

If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, the following will occur:

•

the as adjusted percentage of our common shares held by existing shareholders will decrease to approximately % of the total number of as adjusted common shares outstanding immediately after this offering; and

•

the as adjusted number of our common shares held by investors in this offering will increase to , or approximately %, of the total as adjusted number of common shares outstanding immediately after this offering.

The as adjusted dilution information above is for illustrative purposes only. Our net tangible book value following the completion of this offering is subject to adjustment based on the actual initial public offering price of our common shares and other terms of this offering determined at pricing. The number of our common shares outstanding after this offering as shown above is based on the number of common shares outstanding as of September 30, 2008 after giving effect to the Contribution, and excludes shares issuable upon exercise of currently outstanding options to purchase our common shares.

Selected historical consolidated financial information of

Edgen Murray II, L.P.

Background

Buy-out Transaction and MIM Acquisition

On February 1, 2005, a corporation formed by Fund III and certain members of the management of Edgen Corporation acquired the business of Edgen Corporation. We applied SFAS 141 and allocated the transaction consideration to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, including goodwill and other intangibles, at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. For periods prior to February 1, 2005, however, these assets and liabilities remain presented at their respective historical values. As a result, the balances and amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for periods after the Buy-out Transaction are not comparable with those in respect of the periods prior to the Buy-out Transaction. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — The Buy-out Transaction.”

In connection with the acquisition of Murray International Metals Limited and its subsidiaries on December 16, 2005, Edgen Corporation’s stockholders transferred all of their equity interests in the company to a newly created holding company, Edgen/Murray, L.P., in exchange for common and preferred partnership interests of Edgen/Murray, L.P., and Edgen Corporation became a wholly owned subsidiary of Edgen/Murray, L.P. For the MIM Acquisition, we applied fair value purchase accounting under SFAS 141 and allocated the transaction consideration to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, including goodwill and other intangibles, at their respective fair values as of the applicable acquisition date. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Formation of Edgen/Murray, L.P. and the MIM Acquisition.”

Recapitalization Transaction

On May 11, 2007, Edgen Murray II, L.P., a newly created holding company, acquired our business in a transaction led by Fund IV. In this transaction, Edgen/Murray, L.P. distributed the shares of its two direct subsidiaries, Edgen Murray Corporation and Pipe Acquisition Limited, to its partners. The partners then sold a portion of the distributed shares to subsidiaries of Edgen Murray II, L.P. for cash at the fair market value at the date of the transaction. The remaining distributed shares were contributed by certain partners, generally members of our management, to Edgen Murray II, L.P. in exchange for common limited partnership units of Edgen Murray II, L.P. At the date of the Recapitalization Transaction, Edgen/Murray, L.P. and Edgen Murray II, L.P. were controlled by general partners that were controlled by the same principals of JCP. In addition, funds managed by JCP owned approximately 75% of Edgen/Murray, L.P. prior to the Recapitalization Transaction and approximately 38% of Edgen Murray II, L.P. after the Recapitalization Transaction. Because the same principals of JCP controlled both Edgen/Murray, L.P. and Edgen Murray II, L.P., the Recapitalization Transaction was accounted for as a business combination of entities under common control for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, fair value purchase accounting has not been applied as it was for the Buy-out Transaction and MIM Acquisition, which means we have not recorded the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including goodwill and other intangibles, at the date of the Recapitalization Transaction. Instead, we have maintained the historical carryover basis of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in accordance with SFAS 141, and we have recorded the purchase by Edgen Murray II, L.P. of the interests held by the partners of Edgen/Murray, L.P. as a distribution in the statement of partners’ capital (deficit), which has resulted in a negative equity account. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Recapitalization Transaction.”

References in this prospectus and our financial statements to the “Predecessor” in respect of the periods prior to the Buy-out Transaction are references to Edgen Corporation and references to the “Successor” mean:

•

Edgen Corporation and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods prior to the December 16, 2005 MIM Acquisition;

•

Edgen/Murray, L.P. and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods after the MIM Acquisition and prior to the May 11, 2007 Recapitalization Transaction; and

•

Edgen Murray II, L.P. and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods after the Recapitalization Transaction.

Other Acquisitions

We have also completed other acquisitions, including the acquisition of Western Flow Products, Inc. on July 15, 2005, PetroSteel on May 11, 2007 and EVS on August 31, 2007. For each of these acquisitions, we applied fair value purchase accounting under SFAS 141 and allocated the transaction consideration to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, including goodwill and other intangibles, at their respective fair values as of the applicable acquisition date. In addition, the historical financial statements of Edgen Murray II, L.P. include the results of their operations and cash flows of these acquired businesses from the respective acquisition date. This treatment may also affect the comparability of our financial information from period to period.

Contribution

Edgen Murray Limited was incorporated in August 2008 to serve as a future holding company for our non-North American subsidiaries. Prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, Edgen Murray Limited will also become the holding company for our North American subsidiaries as a result of the Contribution and, as our new parent holding company, will serve as the issuer in this offering. As a result, the historical financial information included in this prospectus represents the consolidated financial statements of our current parent holding company, Edgen Murray II, L.P., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Contribution will be accounted for as a business combination among entities under common control and the historical carryover basis of assets and liabilities will remain unchanged similar to the Recapitalization Transaction previously described. As a result, the Contribution will not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows as of the date of the Contribution. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Formation of Edgen Murray Limited and the Contribution.”

Financial statement presentation

We have derived (1) our selected statement of operations, cash flow and other financial data for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 (Successor), the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005 (Predecessor) and our selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006 and 2007 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus and (2) our selected statement of operations, cash flow and other financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008 and our selected balance sheet data as of September 30, 2008 from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

We have derived our selected statement of operations, cash flow and other financial data for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 (Predecessor) and our selected balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 (Predecessor) from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus.

Historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of future performance or operations, and results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for a full year. The selected financial data presented below represent portions of our financial statements and are not complete. You should read this information in conjunction with, and it is qualified in its entirety by reference to, “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this prospectus.

The following tables set forth, for the periods and dates indicated, our selected historical consolidated financial information.


	Predecessor						Successor
(dollars in thousands)	Year ended December 31, 2003		Year ended December 31, 2004		Period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005		Period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 ⁽¹⁾		Year ended December 31, 2006 ⁽¹⁾		Year ended December 31, 2007		Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	Year ended December 31, 2003		Year ended December 31, 2004						Year ended December 31, 2006 ⁽¹⁾		Year ended December 31, 2007		2007		2008
Statement of operations:
Sales	$	147,025	$	207,821	$	18,945	$	303,361	$	686,937	$	917,657	$	656,103	$	900,218
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)		121,146		155,357		14,153		241,346		548,744		748,722		530,344		706,930
Selling, general and administrative expense ⁽²⁾		29,595		32,009		14,364		29,962		60,292		68,310		49,897		67,018
Depreciation and amortization expense		2,001		2,400		201		7,602		21,051		22,570		12,883		17,666

Total operating expenses		152,742		189,766		28,718		278,910		630,087		839,602		593,124		791,614
Income (loss) from operations		(5,717)		18,055		(9,773)		24,451		56,850		78,055		62,979		108,604
Other income (expense) ⁽³⁾		174		106		(50)		(358)		13,345		3,176		3,540		(16)
Loss on prepayment of debt		—		—		—		—		—		(31,385)		(31,385)		—
Interest expense, net		(3,122)		(5,163)		(333)		(13,733)		(33,822)		(48,301)		(35,659)		(33,932)

Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)		(8,665)		12,998		(10,156)		10,360		36,373		1,545		(525)		74,656
Income tax expense (benefit)		(4,195)		(3,211)		(1,916)		3,340		12,891		(1,370)		(4,493)		24,367

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(4,470)		16,209		(8,240)		7,020		23,482		2,915		3,968		50,289
Discontinued operations:
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax (benefit)		(348)		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Income tax (benefit)		(159)		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Net income (loss)		(4,659)		16,209		(8,240)		7,020		23,482		2,915		3,968		50,289
Preferred interest and dividend requirement		(2,212)		(2,206)		(190)		(1,798)		(4,349)		(1,656)		(1,656)		—

Net income (loss) applicable to common unitholders/ shareholders	$	(6,871)	$	14,003	$	(8,430)	$	5,222	$	19,133	$	1,259	$	2,312	$	50,289

Basic ⁽⁴⁾
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(1.40)	$	3.21	$	(1.99)	$	36.78	$	65.83	$	5.51	$	9.74	$	257.50
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(0.04)		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Basic earnings per share/units	$	(1.44)	$	3.21	$	(1.99)	$	36.78	$	65.83	$	5.51	$	9.74	$	257.50

Diluted ⁽⁴⁾
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(1.48)	$	3.20	$	(1.99)	$	35.58	$	64.66	$	5.15	$	9.14	$	242.55
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		(0.04)		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Diluted earnings per share/units	$	(1.44)	$	3.20	$	(1.99)	$	35.58	$	64.66	$	5.15	$	9.14	$	242.55

Weighted average common shares/units ⁽⁴⁾:
Basic		4,782,596		4,367,999		4,243,092		141,998		290,633		228,599		237,442		195,298

Diluted		4,782,596		4,371,695		4,243,092		146,771		295,912		244,635		252,889		207,335


	Predecessor								Successor
	As of December 31,													As of September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2003			2004			2005 ⁽⁵⁾		2006		2007			2007			2008
Balance sheet data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,125		$	134		$	41,146	$	15,858	$	48,457		$	47,434		$	21,356
Working capital		53,633			60,868			153,187		189,384		296,190			290,316			336,056
Net property, plant and equipment		11,668			10,423			40,940		41,116		43,530			43,881			43,107
Total assets		105,560			118,862			527,632		545,760		709,554			719,920			749,590
Long-term debt and capital leases		50,973			47,883			286,688		286,546		575,856			581,655			562,027
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and preferred units ⁽⁶⁾		53,918			55,979			—		—		—			—			—
Preferred partnership units included in total partners’ capital ⁽⁷⁾		—			—			50,800		50,542		—			—			—
Total partners’ capital/shareholders equity (deficit) ^{(7) (8)}		(25,533	)		(11,755	)		71,812		98,174		(68,486	)		(61,368	)		(33,331	)

(1)

Our consolidated statement of operations for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 includes 45 days of operating results of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries from the date of the MIM Acquisition on December 16, 2005 through its fiscal year end on January 31, 2006, and our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes eleven months of operating results of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries from February 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 because Pipe Acquisition Limited’s January 31 fiscal year end was not changed to December 31 until September 30, 2006. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Factors affecting comparability of financial information — Difference in subsidiary fiscal year.”

(2)

Selling, general and administrative expense includes $12.0 million in Buy-out Transaction related expenses for the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005, approximately $5.5 million (£3.1 million) in bonus payments and applicable payroll taxes to certain Murray International Metals Limited employees prior to the MIM Acquisition for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and $2.5 million in Recapitalization Transaction related expenses and $2.0 million of compensation expense related to one-time equity grants for the year ended December 31, 2007.

(3)	Other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes a $13.2 million foreign exchange gain on US dollar denominated debt held at our UK subsidiary with a functional currency of UK pounds.

(4)

In this table and our consolidated financial statements, to present per share/unit data for periods prior to the formation of Edgen Murray II, L.P. we convert the number of shares/units outstanding for the applicable period into an equivalent number of Edgen Murray II, L.P. common limited partnership units. Upon the Contribution, our capitalization will change and these per share/unit data will not be comparable. See “Prospectus summary—Summary historical consolidated and unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information,” for historical unit/per share data converted to reflect the change in our capitalization that will result from the Contribution.

(5)

Balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 includes the consolidated balance sheet of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries as of January 31, 2006 because Pipe Acquisition Limited’s January 31 fiscal year end was not changed to December 31 until September 30, 2006. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Factors affecting comparability of financial information — Difference in subsidiary fiscal year.”

(6)	Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock was replaced by redeemable preferred stock on February 1, 2005 in connection with the Buy-out Transaction.

(7)

In connection with the formation of Edgen/Murray, L.P. and the MIM Acquisition in 2005, preferred partnership units were issued to existing Edgen Corporation shareholders, certain members of management of Murray International Metals Limited and Murray Metals Group Limited. In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction and subsequent dissolution of Edgen/Murray, L.P., the preferred partnership units were extinguished. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Formation of Edgen/Murray, L.P. and the MIM Acquisition.”

(8)

Total partners’ capital/shareholders’ equity (deficit) as of December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008 reflects reductions in partners’ capital in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007. Because the same principals at JCP controlled both Edgen/Murray, L.P. and Edgen Murray II, L.P., the entities were considered to be under common control for financial reporting purposes. As a result, fair value purchase accounting has not been applied, which means that we have not recorded the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including goodwill and other intangibles, at the date of the Recapitalization Transaction. Instead, we have maintained the historical carryover basis of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in accordance with SFAS 141, and we have recorded the purchase by Edgen Murray II, L.P. of the interests held by the partners of Edgen/Murray, L.P. as a distribution in the statement of partners’ capital (deficit). This has resulted in a negative balance for total partners’ capital/shareholders’ equity.

Unaudited pro forma condensed combined

financial information

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is presented to illustrate the effects of the following transactions on our historical results of operations:

•

the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007, including the repayment of $266.0 million of senior secured notes issued by our subsidiaries, the incurrence of the $425.0 million first lien term loans and $75.0 million second lien term loan and borrowings under the revolving credit agreement;

•

the acquisition of PetroSteel on May 11, 2007; and

•

the issuance of common shares in this offering and the repayment of $ million of our first lien term loans with the expected net proceeds to us, assuming an initial public offering price of $ per common share (which is the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus).

We have not included the pro forma effects of the acquisition of EVS on August 31, 2007, because it was not material to our results of operations.

In the Recapitalization Transaction, Edgen/Murray, L.P. distributed all of the shares of its two direct subsidiaries, Edgen Murray Corporation and Pipe Acquisition Limited, to its partners. Following the distribution, the partners sold a portion of the distributed shares to subsidiaries of Edgen Murray II, L.P. for an aggregate of $327.1 million in cash. The remaining distributed shares were contributed to Edgen Murray II, L.P. in exchange for an aggregate of 45,294.85 common limited partnership units of Edgen Murray II, L.P. Concurrently, Edgen Murray II, L.P. also issued 155,100 common limited partnership units to new investors for $1,000 per unit in cash. Following these issuances, Edgen Murray II, L.P. was controlled by the same principals of JCP who controlled Edgen/Murray, L.P.

In connection with these transactions, the subsidiaries of Edgen/Murray, L.P. discharged their then existing senior indebtedness, including $32.8 million of revolving borrowings, all of the 9⁷/8% senior secured notes at a redemption price of $151.1 million and all of the senior secured floating rate notes at a redemption price of $141.7 million. In turn, Edgen Murray II, L.P. and its subsidiaries incurred new senior indebtedness, including $38.6 million under our revolving credit agreement and $500.0 million under our first and second lien term loans. Edgen Murray II, L.P. paid $13.6 million in agent fees and expenses, $2.0 million in financing advisory fees and $4.6 million in other professional fees and expenses in connection with the incurrence of this indebtedness.

We have derived our historical consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2007 from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

We have derived the PetroSteel historical consolidated statement of operations data for the period January 1, 2007 to May 11, 2007 from PetroSteel’s audited combined financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 assumes that the transactions described above took place on January 1, 2007. The pro forma adjustments are based upon currently available information and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. However, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is presented for informational purposes only and should not be considered indicative of actual results that would have been achieved had the transactions described above actually been consummated on the dates indicated and do not purport to be indicative of balance sheet data or results of operations as of any future date or for any future period.

The Recapitalization Transaction has been accounted for as a business combination of entities under common control for financial reporting purposes. As a result, we have maintained the historical carryover basis of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities as of May 11, 2007 in accordance with SFAS 141, and fair value purchase accounting has not been applied. These adjustments are more fully described in the notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information below.

The acquisition of PetroSteel has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and the resulting assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been reflected at their estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition in accordance with SFAS 141. These adjustments are more fully described in the notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information below.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations does not give effect to this offering or the application of the expected net proceeds to us to repay a portion of our first lien term loans.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the sections in this prospectus entitled “Selected historical consolidated financial information of Edgen Murray II, L.P.” and “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and our audited consolidated and unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, PetroSteel’s audited combined financial statements and Murray International Metals Limited’s audited consolidated financial statements, and in each case the related notes thereto, contained elsewhere in this prospectus.

Unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations

year ended December 31, 2007


	Historical						Adjustments for acquisition and Recapitalization Transaction			Pro forma subtotal year ended December 31, 2007			Adjustments for offering		Pro forma as adjusted year ended December 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)	Year ended December 31, 2007			PetroSteel January 1 to May 11, 2007 ⁽¹⁾									Adjustments for offering
Statement of operations:
Sales	$	917,657		$	33,452		$	—		$	951,109		$	—	$	951,109
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)		748,722			27,629			—			776,351			—		776,351
Selling, general and administrative expense ⁽²⁾		68,310			1,139			—			69,449			—		69,449
Depreciation and amortization expense		22,570			—			2,745	⁽³⁾		25,315			—		25,315

Total operating expenses		839,602			28,768			2,745			871,115			—		871,115
Income (loss) from operations		78,055			4,684			(2,745	)		79,994			—		79,994
Other income (expense)		3,176			(240	)		—			2,936			—		2,936
Loss on prepayment of debt		(31,385	)		—			—			(31,385	)		—		(31,385	)
Interest (expense) benefit, net		(48,301	)		44			(1,784	) ⁽⁴⁾		(50,041	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax (benefit) expense, net		1,545			4,488			(4,529	)		1,504
Income tax (benefit) expense, net		(1,370	)		—			(412	) ⁽⁵⁾		(1,782	)

Net income		2,915			4,488			(4,117	)		3,286

Preferred interest and dividend requirement		(1,656	)		—			1,656	⁽⁶⁾		—			—		—

Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders	$	1,259		$	4,488		$	(2,461	)	$	3,286				$

Earnings per unit/share ⁽⁷⁾:
Basic	$	5.51								$					$

Diluted	$	5.15								$					$


Weighted average common units/shares ⁽⁷⁾:
Basic		228,599

Diluted		244,635

(1)

On May 11, 2007, Edgen Murray Corporation acquired substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of PetroSteel pursuant to an asset purchase agreement. The purchase price for the assets consisted of $24.7 million in cash (including acquisition costs of $0.5 million), a $4.0 million three-year subordinated note, equity securities having a fair market value

of $8.0 million, a cash earn-out payment of up to $12.0 million over a three year term to be determined on each anniversary date of the acquisition, and the assumption of certain working capital liabilities of PetroSteel. On May 11, 2008, the sellers of PetroSteel earned an initial $4.0 million of the earn-out payment.

The purchase price allocation included $1.6 million in goodwill and $25.9 million in other identifiable intangible assets, including $21.9 million for a non-competition agreement and $4.0 million in sales backlog. The fair value of the non-competition agreement and backlog has been derived using an income/excess earnings valuation method which is based on the assumption that earnings are generated by all of the assets held by the company, both tangible and intangible. The income/excess earnings method estimates the fair value of an intangible asset by discounting its future cash flows and applying charges for contributory assets. Certain estimates and assumptions were used to derive the non-competition agreement intangible, including potential losses resulting from such competition, the enforceability of the terms in the agreement and the likelihood of competition in the absence of the agreement. In determining the fair value of backlog, the projected earnings from open sales orders as of the acquisition date were discounted back to the acquisition date. The useful life for the non-competition agreement has been estimated based on the term of the employment agreement and the subsequent non-competition restricted period, while the useful life for backlog has been based on the scheduled delivery dates of the applicable open sales orders.

The pro forma adjustment reflects PetroSteel’s results from January 1, 2007 to May 11, 2007.

(2)	Selling, general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 includes $2.5 million of Recapitalization Transaction related expenses and $2.0 million of compensation expense related to one-time equity grants.

(3)

The adjustment to depreciation and amortization expense represents additional amortization expense associated with the amortization of other intangible assets acquired in the PetroSteel acquisition. These other intangible assets are being amortized over six years, except for backlog which is amortized over a period up to 12 months, as shown in the following table:


	Estimated Life	Annual Amortization		Amortization from May 12, 2007 to December 31, 2007		January 1, 2007 to May 11, 2007 Adjustment
Backlog	12 months	$	4,032	$	2,596	$	1,436
Non-compete agreement	6 years		3,646		2,337		1,309

		$	7,678	$	4,933	$	2,745

These other intangible assets are deductible for US income tax purposes.

(4)	Represents the adjustments to interest expense as follows:


(In thousands)
Elimination of historical interest expense ^(a)	$	15,611
Interest on the first lien term loans and the second lien term loan ^(b)		(15,203	)
Interest on borrowings under the revolving credit agreement ^(c)		(1,183	)
Note payable to the sellers of PetroSteel ^(d)		(120	)
Amortization of debt issue costs ^(e)		(889	)

Total	$	(1,784	)

(a)

Reflects the elimination of historical interest expense related to our senior secured notes repaid in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction and the related amortization of deferred financing costs.

(b)

Represents the interest related to the $425.0 million first lien term loans and $75.0 million second lien term loan incurred on May 11, 2007. Pro forma interest expense has been calculated from January 1, 2007 to May 11, 2007 and is based on the aggregate principal balance of $500.0 million at a weighted average

interest rate of 8.42%. For $150.0 million of floating rate term loans, the weighted average interest rate utilizes the three month LIBOR on January 1, 2007 and April 1, 2007 of 5.36% and 5.35% plus the applicable margin of 2.75% and 6.25%, for the first and second lien term loans respectively. Additionally, the weighted average interest rate has been adjusted to reflect the impact of interest rate swap agreements with fixed rates of 5.15%, 4.88% and 5.19% on $175.0 million, $100.0 million and $75.0 million of term loans, respectively. Each 0.125% increase (decrease) in the interest rate would have less than a $0.1 million increase (decrease) in the assumed pro forma interest expense.

(c)

For purposes of calculating interest on the borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, we assume $38.6 million of borrowings (which was the actual amount of borrowings in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction) and a prime rate of 8.25% for the period January 1, 2007 to May 11, 2007 plus a spread of 0.50% resulting in an interest rate of approximately 8.75%. Each 0.125% increase (decrease) in the interest rate would have a less than a $0.1 million increase (decrease) in the assumed pro forma interest expense.

(d)

Represents the pro forma interest related to the $4.0 million subordinated note issued to the sellers of PetroSteel, which accrues interest at a rate of 8.00% per annum, compounded annually.

(e)

Reflects the $9.8 million amortization of debt issue costs using the effective interest method over the term of the first lien term loans (seven years), plus debt issue costs of $1.6 million over the term of the second lien term loan (eight years), and debt issue costs of $4.4 million over the term of the revolving credit agreement (five years).

This amount was calculated as follows:


(in thousands)	Term	Total Debt Issuance Costs		Annual Amortization		January 1, 2007 to May 11, 2007 Adjustment
First lien term loans	7	$	9,771	$	1,396	$	501
Second lien term loan	8		1,609		201		72
Revolving credit agreement	5		4,405		881		316

Total		$	15,785	$	2,478	$	889

(5)	Reflects the tax effect of the earnings from PetroSteel and the pro forma adjustments at a blended statutory rate of approximately 34% as follows.


	EMC			PAL			Total
Eliminate historical amounts:
Amortization of deferred financing costs	$	616		$	1,539		$	2,155
Interest on old revolving line of credit		324			—			324
Interest on old bonds		5,967			7,165			13,132
Add pro forma amounts:
Taxable income from PetroSteel earnings		4,488			—			4,488
Depreciation and amortization		(2,745	)		—			(2,745	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs		(558	)		(331	)		(889	)
Interest on new revolving line of credit		(1,183	)		—			(1,183	)
Interest on Term Loans		(11,140	)		(4,063	)		(15,203	)
Interest on PetroSteel note payable		(120	)		—			(120	)

Total		(4,351	)		4,310			(41	)
Tax rate ^(a)		37.03	%		27.82	%		NM

Total income tax (benefit) expense	$	(1,611	)	$	1,199		$	(412	)

(a)

Reflects a blended statutory tax rate based on earnings in the respective foreign tax jurisdictions.

(6)	Represents the elimination of accrued preferred interest at 8.50% per annum on preferred units of Edgen Murray Corporation reacquired in connection with the PetroSteel Acquisition.

(7)

In “Selected historical consolidated financial information of Edgen Murray II, L.P.” and our consolidated financial statements, to present per share/unit data for periods after January 31, 2005 and prior to the formation of Edgen Murray II, L.P. we convert the number of shares/units outstanding for the applicable period into an equivalent number of Edgen Murray II, L.P. common limited partnership units. Upon the Contribution, our capitalization will change and these per share/unit data will not be comparable. Therefore, in this table, to present earnings per share/unit and weighted average common shares/units data, for each respective period subsequent to February 1, 2005, we convert the number of shares/units outstanding for the applicable period into an equivalent number of Edgen Murray II, L.P. common limited partnership units and then convert such number of Edgen Murray II, L.P. common limited partnership units into an equivalent number of Edgen Murray Limited common shares using a ratio of common limited partnership units to common shares. Using this ratio, weighted average common shares/units reflects the effect of shares to be issued in connection with the Contribution. This ratio reflects that, as a result of the Contribution, the partners of Edgen Murray II, L.P. will receive common shares of Edgen Murray Limited representing an ownership interest in Edgen Murray Limited that is equivalent to their ownership interest in Edgen Murray II, L.P. In addition, in the pro forma as adjusted column, we further adjust weighted average common units/shares to reflect the issuance of common shares in this offering assuming this offering had occurred on January 1, 2007 at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share (which is the midpoint of the range listed on the cover page of this prospectus). For all columns, basic weighted average common units/shares excludes non-vested restricted shares and shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options to purchase our common shares and diluted weighted average common units/shares includes non-vested restricted shares and shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options to purchase our common shares, using the treasury stock method, to the extent the incremental common shares are dilutive.

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations

The following Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the heading “Risk factors.” Unless otherwise provided below, references to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Edgen Murray Limited and its subsidiaries, after giving effect to the Contribution. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

General

Background

We distribute and market our products and provide procurement and project management services as part of our customer service on projects spanning the complete scope of the energy industry. We supply our products to fabricators, contractors, owners and operators engaged in the development of new energy infrastructure projects (including exploration and production, gathering and transmission, refining and processing, new oil and natural gas drilling rig construction, power generation and chemical and petrochemical), as well as for the MRO of existing facilities. Our global sales and distribution network enables us to efficiently procure and deliver our entire product offering worldwide to customers who may not have the relationships, resources or logistical support or who may not be willing or able to purchase in sufficient volume or on a cost-effective basis to complete procurement independently. Our customers are principally end-users and include “upstream” oil and natural gas exploration and production companies, “midstream” gathering and transmission, pipeline and storage companies, “downstream” refining and processing companies, power generation companies and engineering and construction firms. We also supply our products, on a more limited basis, to chemical, petrochemical, mining and alternative energy companies. We believe that our global presence, efficient customer service and expansive inventory of specialty steel products are key to our growth.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 79% of our total revenue was attributable to customers that operate in or service the energy infrastructure markets. Within those markets, approximately 62% of our total revenue was attributable to customers that operate in or service the oil and natural gas industry and the remainder was attributable to customers that operate in the petrochemical, power generation and fabrication industries.

Principal factors that affect our business

Our business is substantially dependent upon conditions in the energy industry and, in particular, capital expenditures by customers in the oil and natural gas exploration and production, gathering and transmission, crude oil refining and the energy processing and power generation industries. The level of energy-related capital expenditures generally depends on prevailing views of future oil, natural gas, refined products, electric power and petrochemical supply and demand, which are influenced by numerous factors, including, among others:

•

Changes in global economic conditions. Until recently, global economic conditions have been generally favorable and have resulted in high levels of industrial expansion and new project demand, which in turn has resulted in increased demand for our specialty steel products. Although we believe that continued investment in energy infrastructure is a long-term trend, downturns in the general economy, or more particularly in the oil and natural gas industry, could materially reduce demand for our products and result in a decrease in our revenues.

•

Changes in oil and natural gas prices. The significant increases in global oil and natural gas demand over the past several years have resulted in increased investment in energy infrastructure. Oil and natural gas prices in particular have been affected by increased demand for refined products in developing nations, worldwide

political conditions, OPEC actions, weather conditions and environmental and other government regulations. A significant portion of our revenues are dependent on oil and natural gas prices and if capital expenditures were to significantly decline as a result of lower oil and natural gas prices, our revenues and profitability would be adversely affected.

•

Availability of adequate financing. Our customers often depend on external sources of capital to finance new energy infrastructure projects as well as to expand existing facilities. Demand for our products is directly related to our customers ability to make capital expenditures. Our customers have generally had sufficient sources of funding, but reduced access to adequate or reasonably priced capital financing could result in a reduced demand for our products.

•

Increasing rates of oil and natural gas production in non-traditional geographies. As oil and natural gas production in the world’s proven locations has declined, the search for oil and natural gas has moved to much harsher environments — deeper water, deeper wells, extreme heat or cold and higher pressures. The infrastructure required for these environments requires special steel materials to withstand the hostile environmental conditions. Our products are specifically designed to tolerate these conditions, which has led to greater customer demand and resulted in increased sales levels. Furthermore, as oil and natural gas production has developed away from traditional areas, the need to construct infrastructure to efficiently transport oil and natural gas from remote regions to points of consumption also has resulted in increased expenditures for high-grade pipe and fittings.

•

Investment in refining capacity. As a result of environmental requirements and the processing of heavier crude oils, refineries have been required to make enhancements to their existing processes to produce cleaner-burning fuel and to compensate for the requirements to refine heavier crude oils. The growing demand for energy resources, particularly in developing countries, also has necessitated increased refining capacity. These factors have led to expenditures for expansion, process improvements and new refineries and ultimately to increased demand for our specialty chrome, alloy and stainless steel products. Decreased fuel demand could therefore result in reduced revenues and profitability.

In addition to demand driven factors, our business is also affected by changes in the cost of steel. Fluctuations in the costs of the products we supply are largely driven by changes in the condition of the general economy, changes in product inventories held by our customers, our vendors and other distributors and prevailing steel prices around the world. Historically, we have managed to successfully maintain our profit margins by adjusting the prices we charge our customers to reflect variances in the cost of our products. Demand for our products, the actions of our competitors, and other factors largely out of our control will influence whether, and to what extent, we will be successful in maintaining our profit margins in the future.

Factors affecting comparability of financial information

Fair value accounting and historical carryover basis accounting

In accordance with SFAS 141, we applied fair value purchase accounting to the Buy-out Transaction on February 1, 2005 because it involved a change of control. This means we allocated the transaction consideration to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed, including goodwill and other intangibles, at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. For periods prior to February 1, 2005, however, these assets and liabilities remain presented at their respective historical values. As a result, the balances and amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements and footnotes for periods after the Buy-out Transaction are not comparable with those in respect of the periods prior to the Buy-out Transaction. See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — The Buy-out Transaction.”

We have also completed other acquisitions, including the acquisition of Murray International Metals Limited and its subsidiaries on December 16, 2005, Western Flow Products, Inc. on July 15, 2005, PetroSteel on May 11, 2007 and EVS on August 31, 2007. We also applied fair value purchase accounting to these acquisitions under SFAS 141, with the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including goodwill and other intangibles, recorded at their respective fair values as of each acquisition date. This treatment may also affect the comparability of our financial information from period to period.

The Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007, however, did not involve a change of control for financial reporting purposes because the same principals of JCP controlled both Edgen/Murray, L.P. and Edgen Murray II, L.P. Accordingly, the Recapitalization Transaction was accounted for as a business combination of entities under common control for financial reporting purposes, and we have not recorded the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including goodwill and other intangibles, at the date of the Recapitalization Transaction as we did for the Buy-out Transaction and other acquisitions. Instead, we have maintained the historical carryover basis of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in accordance with SFAS 141, and we have recorded the purchase by Edgen Murray II, L.P. of the interests held by the partners of Edgen/Murray, L.P. as a distribution in the statement of partners’ capital (deficit). See “Certain relationships and related person transactions — Recapitalization Transaction.”

•

Edgen Corporation and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods prior to the December 16, 2005 MIM Acquisition;

•

Edgen/Murray, L.P. and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods after the MIM Acquisition and prior to the May 11, 2007 Recapitalization Transaction; and

•

Edgen Murray II, L.P. and its subsidiaries, in respect of the periods after the Recapitalization Transaction.

Difference in subsidiary fiscal year

Effective September 30, 2006, our subsidiary Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries changed their fiscal year end to December 31. Prior to that date, Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries had a fiscal year ending January 31, which differed from our fiscal year ending of December 31. As a result, our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 includes the consolidated balance sheet of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries as of January 31, 2006 and our consolidated statement of operations, statement of partners’ capital/shareholders’ equity (deficit), and statement of cash flows for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 includes 45 days of operating results of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries, representing their operating results from the date of the MIM Acquisition on December 16, 2005 through its fiscal year end on January 31, 2006. Additionally, our consolidated statement of operations, statement of partners’ capital/shareholders’ equity (deficit) and statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes eleven months of operating results of Pipe Acquisition Limited and its subsidiaries from February 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006.

Reportable segments

We manage our operations in two geographic markets — the Western Hemisphere and the Eastern Hemisphere. We have four reportable segments, which are determined primarily based upon the geographic locations of our operations. Our Western Hemisphere market comprises one of our reportable segments, which was formerly referred to as the Americas reportable segment. Our Eastern Hemisphere market is segregated further to derive our reportable segments for that geographic market, which include the UK (Europe/West Africa), Singapore (Asia/Pacific) and UAE (Middle East). We include operating expenses of our non-trading entities, including Edgen Murray II, L.P., Edgen Murray Cayman Corporation and Pipe Acquisition Limited, in General Company expenses.

Our Western Hemisphere operations are headquartered in Houston, Texas and operate through a regional and branch network of locations in the United States and Canada. Sixteen of our Western Hemisphere locations stock inventory for distribution.

Our Eastern Hemisphere operations are headquartered in Newbridge, Scotland and operate through a regional and branch network of locations in Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Middle East. Five of our locations in the Eastern Hemisphere stock inventory.

The following map illustrates our worldwide presence. See “Business — Worldwide presence” for a description of our presence in these locations.

LOGO

Effects of currency fluctuations

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 and as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 16% and 11%, respectively, of our total assets and approximately 17% and 13%, respectively, of our revenues were denominated in UK pounds, our functional currency in the United Kingdom. As a result, a material change in the value of the UK pound relative to the US dollar could significantly impact our revenues, cash flows and net income. The balance sheet amounts are translated into US dollars at the exchange rate at the end of the month and the income statement amounts are translated at the average exchange rate for the period, in each case using the noon buying rate as quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

From time to time, we also enter into purchase and sales commitments that are denominated in a currency other than the US dollar (primarily the Euro). Our practices include entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts in an effort to minimize foreign currency exposure related to forecasted purchases and sales of certain products. These risks can create volatility in earnings and cash flows from period to period. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Revenue sources

We do not manufacture any products. We are a distributor/reseller of our suppliers’ manufactured products. We often purchase these products in large quantities that are efficient for our suppliers to produce, and we subsequently resell these products in smaller quantities to meet our customers’ requirements.

We generate substantially all of our revenues, net of returns and allowances, from the sale of our products to third parties. We also generate a negligible component of our revenues from a range of cutting and finishing services that we coordinate for our customers upon request. Our fees for these services are incorporated into our sales price. Freight costs are generally included in our sales price as well. Our sales are reduced by sales discounts and incentives provided to our customers. We recognize revenue on product sales when title and risk of loss transfer to the customer.

Pricing

Pricing for our products significantly impacts our results of operations. Generally, as pricing increases, so do our revenues. Our pricing usually increases when the cost of our materials increases. If prices increase and we maintain the same gross profit percentage, we generate higher levels of gross profit dollars for the same operational efforts. Conversely, if pricing declines, we will typically generate lower levels of gross profit. Because changes in pricing do not necessarily lower our expense structure, the impact on our results of operations from changes in pricing may be greater than the effect of volume changes.

Principal costs and expenses

Our principal costs and expenses consist of the following: cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization), selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, and interest expense. Our most significant cost of sales consists primarily of the cost of our products at weighted average cost, plus inbound and outbound freight expense, outside processing expenses, earned incentives from vendors, physical inventory adjustments and inventory obsolescence charges.

Our cost of sales is influenced significantly by the prices we pay our vendors to procure the products we distribute to our customers. Changes in these costs may result, for example, from increases or decreases in raw material costs, changes in our relationships with vendors or earned incentives from our vendors. In general, as a result of increasing global demand for steel, steel prices and raw material costs have been rising since 2004. Our recent experience with vendors is that, because of the demand pressure on steel production, they are generally not willing to absorb raw material cost escalations, preferring instead to pass the costs on to us. Generally, we have passed these cost increases on to our customers. Market conditions in the future may not permit us to fully pass through future cost increases or may force us to grant other concessions to customers. An inability to promptly pass such increases on to customers may increase our cost of sales and reduce our profitability. Our product costs are reduced by vendor discounts and purchase incentives. Payment for our products is typically due to our vendors within 30 to 60 days of delivery.

Selling, general and administrative expenses include sales and administrative employee compensation and benefit costs, as well as travel expenses for sales representatives, information technology infrastructure and communication costs, office rent and supplies, professional services, and other general company expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include costs for warehouse personnel and benefits, supplies, equipment maintenance and rental and contract storage and distribution expenses.

Depreciation and amortization consists of amortization of acquired intangible assets, including customer relationships and backlog, and the depreciation of property, plant and equipment including leasehold improvement, capitalized leases, and picking and lifting equipment.

Interest expense includes interest incurred on our indebtedness and amortization of deferred financing costs associated with such indebtedness.

Critical accounting policies

The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different circumstances or conditions. If actual amounts are ultimately different from these estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known.

We believe the following critical accounting policies and estimates affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements. See note 1 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a summary of our significant accounting policies.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized on product sales when the customer takes title and assumes risk of loss. Revenue is recorded, net of discounts, vendor incentives, value added tax and similar taxes as applicable in foreign jurisdictions. Rebates and discounts to customers are determined based on the achievement of certain agreed upon terms and conditions by the customer during each period. Shipping and handling costs incurred are included as a component of cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) on our consolidated statement of operations.

Intercompany eliminations and General Company expenses

We present our segment revenues and income (loss) from operations on an arm’s-length basis, consistent with how we manage our operations and how our chief operating decision maker reviews our results. Revenues and expenses attributable to intercompany transactions are included in the results of our reportable segments. Such amounts are eliminated (under the Eliminations caption) to reconcile our reportable segment amounts to consolidated amounts, as reported in our consolidated statement of operations. In addition to intercompany revenues and expenses, we also separately report General Company expenses, which include unallocated expenses that are not directly attributable to business unit performance.

Accounts receivable

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect our estimate of uncollectible accounts receivable. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is within several sectors of the oil and natural gas industry and is dispersed over a large number of customers worldwide. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and set credit limits based upon reviews of customers’ current credit information and payment histories. We monitor customer payments and maintain a provision for estimated uncollectible accounts based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues that we have identified. Estimation of such losses requires adjusting historical loss experience for current economic conditions and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers. The rate of future credit losses may not be similar to past experience.

We record the effect of any necessary adjustments prior to the publication of our consolidated financial statements. We consider all available information when assessing the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Adjustments made with respect to the allowance for doubtful accounts often relate to improved information not previously known to us. Uncertainties with respect to the allowance for doubtful accounts are inherent in the preparation of financial statements.

Inventories

We state our inventories at the lower of cost or market (net realizable value). We account for our inventories using the weighted average cost method of accounting. Cost includes all costs incurred in bringing the product to its present location and condition, based on purchase cost on a weighted average cost basis. Inventory is written off for obsolete, slow moving or defective items where appropriate. We regularly review our inventory on hand and update our allowances based on historical and current sales trends. Changes in product demand and our customer base may affect the value of inventory on hand and may require higher inventory allowances. Uncertainties with respect to the inventory valuation are inherent in the preparation of financial statements.

Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the amount we paid to acquire a company over the estimated fair value of tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired, less liabilities assumed. As of December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, the goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives balances were $96.4 million and $95.5 million, respectively, representing 13.6% and 12.7% of total assets, respectively.

We account for goodwill under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.142, Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets. Under these rules we test goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment annually or at any other time when impairment indicators exist. As of January 1, 2008, we performed our annual goodwill impairment test, which requires comparison of our estimated fair value to our book value including goodwill. As a result of the test, we believe the goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet is not impaired. In assessing the recoverability of our goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. We estimate future cash flows at the reporting unit level. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges not previously recorded for these assets. For example, an impairment of 10% of our goodwill at December 31, 2007 would have reduced income from operations by $8.3 million.

Long-lived assets

We assess the impairment of long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and finite-lived other identifiable intangible assets such as customer relationships, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets or the asset group may not be recoverable. The asset impairment review assesses the fair value of the assets based on the future cash flows the assets are expected to generate. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from the disposition of the asset (if any) are less than the related asset’s carrying amount. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed their fair values. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments based on our experience and knowledge of our operations and the industries in which we operate. We also estimate the useful lives of other finite-lived intangible assets based on estimates of the economic benefit expected to be received from the acquired assets which could differ from actual results. These estimates can be significantly affected by future changes in market conditions, the capital spending decisions of our customers and inflation. For example, a one year reduction in the useful lives of customer relationship intangible assets, our largest long-lived asset which is amortized over approximately seven years, would have reduced operating income and net income by $2.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2007.

As of December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, our long-lived assets were $130.6 million and $111.9 million, respectively, representing 18.4% and 14.9%, respectively, of total assets.

Equity-based compensation

We have equity-based compensation plans for certain of our executive officers, directors and employees. Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which we refer to as “SFAS No. 123(R),” to account for these plans. SFAS No. 123(R) requires all forms of share-based payments to employees, including options, to be recognized as compensation expense. The compensation expense is measured as the fair value of the award at grant date. No amounts were paid by the holders to obtain the restricted common units we have issued to date.

For restricted units issued in 2005 and 2006, we did not obtain contemporaneous valuations by an unrelated valuation specialist because we believe that we had a good measure of fair value as a result of recent acquisitions negotiated at arm’s-length prices, which included stock consideration. In addition, we believed that our management team and JCP had the appropriate expertise and experience to perform such analyses; and we utilized a methodology which is acknowledged as an acceptable methodology in the applicable accounting literature. For restricted units granted during 2007, the fair value of the restricted units was the same as the per-unit consideration paid by unrelated third parties in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007. We believe the amount paid in this arm’s-length transaction of $1,000 per unit was the most contemporaneous evidence of the fair value of an Edgen Murray II, L.P. common unit at the time the restricted units were granted. See note 10 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for more information regarding the determination of equity-based compensation expense.

For unit options granted during 2007, the fair value of unit options was calculated as $487.84 per unit option using the Black-Scholes pricing model with an exercise price of $1,000 per unit, a risk-free interest rate of 4.38%, an expected volatility of 41.52% and an expected term of 6.5 years. Because no historical data was available, we calculated the expected term for employee unit options using the simplified method in accordance with the SEC’s

Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110. The risk-free interest rate was based on a traded zero-coupon US Treasury bond with a term substantially equal to the option’s expected term at the grant date. The expected volatility used to value unit options was based on an average of historical volatility of companies in industries in which we operate and for which management believes is comparable.

SFAS No. 123(R) also requires compensation cost to be recognized over the requisite service period for all awards granted subsequent to adoption. As required by SFAS No. 123(R), we continue to recognize compensation cost over the explicit vesting period for all unvested awards as of January 1, 2006. At the time of our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), our only outstanding equity compensation was restricted units. Thus, our accounting treatment for equity compensation under SFAS No. 123(R) is the same as the accounting treatment we were already using under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly, there was no impact on our consolidated financial statements as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006.

In connection with the Contribution, we expect to terminate the equity compensation plans of Edgen Murray II, L.P. and replace them with substantially similar Edgen Murray Limited plans. The awards under the Edgen Murray II, L.P. plans will be replaced with awards of equivalent value under the Edgen Murray Limited plans. The value will be equivalent because the new awards will have the same terms and will represent the right to substantially the same percentage ownership interest in Edgen Murray Limited as the existing awards represent in Edgen Murray II, L.P. Edgen Murray Limited, in turn, will have the same underlying assets after the Contribution as Edgen Murray II, L.P. had before the Contribution. There will be no other modifications to the awards (such as changes to the vesting schedule) other than the technical changes necessary to reflect the change in the parent holding company. The technical changes that will be made are authorized by the award agreements. As a result, and in accordance with paragraph 53 of SFAS 123(R), we expect to account for the exchange of outstanding awards as a modification addressed by the award agreement and do not expect any incremental compensation expense to be recognized.

Income tax expense estimates and policies

As part of the income tax provision process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes. This process involves estimating our current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent we believe the recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Further, to the extent that we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a financial accounting period, we must include a tax provision, or reduce our tax benefit in our consolidated statement of operations. We use our judgment to determine our provision or benefit for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets.

There are various factors that may cause our tax assumptions to change in the near term, and we may have to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. We cannot predict whether future tax laws or regulations, including at the foreign, federal, state or local level, might be passed that could have a material effect on our results of operations. We assess the impact of significant changes to tax laws and regulations on a regular basis and update the assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements when new legislation and regulations are enacted.

Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized no adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 resulted in no adjustment to retained earnings. As of December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, we had no unrecognized tax benefits.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We enter into transactions involving various derivative instruments to hedge interest rates and foreign currency denominated sales, purchases, assets and liabilities. These derivative contracts are entered into with financial institutions. We do not use derivative instruments for trading purposes, and we have procedures in place to monitor and control their use.

The Company accounts for certain derivative financial instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which we refer to as “SFAS 133.” SFAS 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value.

Interest rate risk. We have concluded that the interest rate swaps and collar we entered into qualify as cash flow hedges under the provisions of SFAS 133. The swaps and collar are considered substantially effective, with ineffectiveness, if any, charged to the consolidated statements of operations in the period assessed as ineffective. Gains and losses related to the interest rate swaps, net of related tax effects are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and will not be reclassified into earnings until the maturity of the hedge. Net settlements occur quarterly concurrent with interest payments made on the underlying debt. The settlements are the net difference between the fixed rates payable and the floating rates receivable over the quarter under the interest rate swap contracts. The settlements are recognized as a component of interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Currency exchange rate risk. We also hedge against foreign currency exchange rate risk, on a case by case basis, using a series of forward contracts to protect against the exchange risk inherent in our transactions denominated in foreign currencies. The majority of the forward contracts are economic hedges, but a few forward contracts meet the designation of a cash flow hedge as defined by SFAS 133. For transactions designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in the fair value (arising from the change in the spot rates from period to period) is deferred in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” in the consolidated statement of partners’ capital (deficit). These amounts are subsequently recognized in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations in the same period when the underlying transaction impacts the consolidated statements of operations. This recognition generally will occur over periods of less than one year. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value (arising from the change in the value of the forward points or a mismatch in terms) is recognized in the period incurred. These amounts are recognized in other income in the consolidated statements of operations.

Related person transactions

We are controlled by JCP. From time to time, we have engaged in transactions with JCP and its affiliates, including equity and debt financing transactions. For more information about these transactions, see “Certain relationships and related person transactions.”

Results of operations

Overview

Our financial results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were impacted by various factors including:

•

strong worldwide demand for fuel sources and power generation;

•

sustained high oil and natural gas prices that continue to drive increased investment in oil and natural gas infrastructure;

•

our worldwide presence enabled us to capture demand in both the developed and developing regions of the world;

•

our large inventory of specialty steel products enabled us to capture short lead time business and business opportunities that our competitors were not able to meet;

•

cost increases for our products as a result of increased raw material costs and limited product availability from steel mills due to extended production lead times and high demand; and

•

reductions in capital expenditures by our bio-fuel customers as a result of uncertain financing and escalating raw materials costs.

Nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008

The following tables show a comparison of sales and income from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results. See also “— Factors affecting comparability of financial information.”


	Nine months ended September 30,
(millions, except percentages)	2007			2008			Change
Sales
Western Hemisphere	$	401.3		$	597.6		48.9	%
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		124.7			128.8		3.4	%
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		66.8			115.1		72.3	%
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		78.3			84.9		8.3	%

Total Eastern Hemisphere		269.8			328.8		21.9	%
Eliminations		(15.0	)		(26.2	)

Total	$	656.1		$	900.2		37.2	%

Income (loss) from operations
Western Hemisphere	$	31.6		$	72.8		130.4	%
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		20.6			20.2		(1.9	)%
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		8.8			16.1		83.0	%
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		8.4			7.7		(8.3	)%

Total Eastern Hemisphere		37.8			44.0		16.4	%
General Company		(6.4	)		(8.2	)	28.1	%

Total	$	63.0		$	108.6		72.4	%

Income from operations as a % of sales
Western Hemisphere		7.9	%		12.2	%
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		16.5	%		15.7	%
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		13.2	%		14.0	%
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		10.7	%		9.1	%

Total Eastern Hemisphere		14.0	%		13.4	%

Total		9.6	%		12.1	%

Sales

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our consolidated sales increased $244.1 million, or 37.2%, to $900.2 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of higher sales volumes due to construction of natural gas transmission pipelines and fabrication of offshore oil and natural gas structures, the 2007 acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS, and sales price increases.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, sales in our Western Hemisphere market increased $196.3 million, or 48.9%, to $597.6 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily driven by organic growth in both the United States and Canada from sales to customers in the natural gas transmission, refining, and petrochemical industries and the 2007 acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS, with the PetroSteel and EVS acquisitions contributing $90.7 million of the sales growth from the addition of their plate and valve product lines. We also benefited from enhanced oil recovery efforts driven by favorable oil prices. To a lesser

extent, product price increases positively affected our sales as we were able to successfully pass on increased product costs from our vendors. Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were negatively affected by significantly reduced sales volumes to our bio-fuels customers as a result of decreased demand and financing for ethanol producing plants.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, sales in our Eastern Hemisphere market increased $59.0 million, or 21.9%, to $328.8 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to growing demand for high carbon grade steel plate and pipe products used in the construction and maintenance of infrastructure to support oil and natural gas exploration, production and storage activities, particularly in the Asia/Pacific market.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, 59% and 62%, respectively, of our consolidated sales were from oil and natural gas industry customers and our top ten customers represented 29% and 23%, respectively, of our consolidated sales. No single customer represented more than 10% of consolidated sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 or 2008.

Income (loss) from operations

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our consolidated income from operations increased $45.6 million, or 72.4%, to $108.6 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of sales volume growth and an improved sales mix of high pressure gas transmission pipe relative to total sales, and to a lesser extent, sales price increases, as gross margins increased slightly between the periods. Growth in income from operations as a result of increased sales was partially offset by an increase in operating expenses related to performance-based compensation, the expansion of our information technology and finance and accounting activities, an increased sales staff to support our global growth, and to a lesser extent, the 2007 acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income from operations for our Western Hemisphere market increased $41.2 million, or 130.4%, to $72.8 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. This increase in income from operations was primarily driven by organic sales growth, incremental steel plate and valve sales from the 2007 acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS, and to a lesser extent, sales price increases. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $9.7 million, or 28.2%, to $44.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses relates primarily to operating expenses related to performance-based compensation, the expansion of our information technology and finance and accounting activities (which includes professional fees related to information systems expansion and improvements), and the 2007 acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income from operations for our Eastern Hemisphere market increased $6.2 million, or 16.4%, to $44.0 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily due to higher demand in the Asia/Pacific markets for products supporting the construction of offshore oil and natural gas drilling and production. The growth in income from operations in our Eastern Hemisphere market was partially offset by higher variable compensation and employee additions to support the growth of the Company, including the opening of two representative offices in the Asia/Pacific region.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, operating loss for General Company increased $1.8 million, or 28.1%, to $8.2 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007, primarily related to higher one-time professional fees incurred as part of the May 11, 2007 Recapitalization Transaction and included in 2007 expenses.

Other income (expense)

Other income (expense) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of less than $0.1 million was primarily attributable to exchange rate gains of $0.2 million on cash denominated in foreign currencies and other miscellaneous income, offset by a loss of $0.8 million on non-designated foreign currency contracts. This compares to $3.5 million of other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, primarily attributable to exchange rate gains of $2.2 million on cash denominated in foreign currencies, and additionally, foreign exchange gains of $0.8 million on our senior secured floating rate notes.

Loss on prepayment of debt

Loss on prepayment of debt of $31.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 resulted from the repayment of the $136 million aggregate principal amount of our 9⁷/8% senior secured notes and the $130 million aggregate principal amount of our senior secured floating rate notes in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $1.7 million, or 4.8%, to $33.9 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The reduction in interest expense, net was primarily the result of lower interest rates on our $500 million term loans at a weighted average rate of 6.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the interest rates of 9⁷/8% on the $131 million of senior secured notes and approximately 11% on the $130 million of senior secured floating rate notes. Additionally, interest expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 includes $1.8 million of debt issue costs amortization in each period.

Income tax expense (benefit)

Income tax expense was $24.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to an income tax benefit of $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 reflects the taxable income generated from operations at an effective tax rate of approximately 32.6% compared to an income tax benefit generated during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as a result of the loss on the prepayment of our senior secured notes as part of the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007, partially offset by income tax expense related to operations. The effective tax rate of 32.6% reflects the impact of higher taxable income and higher statutory income tax rates in our Western Hemisphere market compared to lower taxable income and statutory income tax rates in our Eastern Hemisphere market.

Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007

The following table provides our statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007. The period-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results. See also “— Factors affecting comparability of financial information.”


	Year ended December 31,
(millions, except percentages)	2006			2007			Change
Sales
Western Hemisphere	$	397.7		$	565.2			42.1	%
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		146.9			163.4			11.2	%
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		89.8			108.5			20.8	%
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		61.6			102.1			65.7	%

Total Eastern Hemisphere		298.3			374.0			25.3	%
Eliminations		(9.1	)		(21.5	)

Total	$	686.9		$	917.7			33.6	%

Income (loss) from operations
Western Hemisphere	$	30.4		$	36.3			19.4	%
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		18.4			27.8			51.1	%
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		13.3			14.0			5.3	%
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		7.9			9.9			25.3	%

Total Eastern Hemisphere		39.6			51.7			30.6	%
General Company		(13.1	)		(9.9	)

Total	$	56.9		$	78.1			37.3	%

Income from operations as a % of sales
Western Hemisphere		7.6	%		6.4	%
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		12.5	%		17.0	%
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		14.8	%		12.9	%
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		12.8	%		9.7	%

Total Eastern Hemisphere		13.3	%		13.8	%

Total		8.3	%		8.5	%

Sales

Sales for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased $230.8 million, or 33.6%, to $917.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily the result of higher sales volumes due to construction of natural gas transmission pipelines and upstream oil and natural gas projects, and to a lesser extent, the 2007 acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS.

Our Western Hemisphere market’s sales growth was primarily organic and the balance resulted from the acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS, which contributed $61.3 million of revenue. Organic growth was driven by energy infrastructure capital expenditures for natural gas transmission pipelines, alternative energy (primarily bio-fuels) and refining/petrochemical processing projects and maintenance.

Our Eastern Hemisphere market’s sales growth was primarily caused by increased sales of specialty carbon and structural sections, seamless pipe and steel plate to the upstream energy infrastructure fabrication industry in the

Middle East and Singapore markets, and, to a lesser extent, by the sale of alloy products that were introduced in our Eastern Hemisphere market in late 2006.

For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, 62% and 55%, respectively, of our sales were to customers in the oil and natural gas industries and our top ten customers represented 31% and 30%, respectively. No single customer represented more than 10% of consolidated sales for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Income (loss) from operations

For the year ended December 31, 2007, income from operations increased $21.2 million, or 37.3%, to $78.1 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily the result of sales volume growth which was partially offset by an increase in operating expenses related to the acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS, performance-based compensation, the expansion of our information technology and accounting departments, and an increased sales staff to support our global growth.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, our Western Hemisphere market grew income from operations $5.9 million, or 19.4%, to $36.3 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily a result of significant project activity in 2007, which increased sales growth but decreased margins. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily related to $3.7 million of Recapitalization Transaction expenses, and to operating expenses added by the acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, income from operations for our Eastern Hemisphere market increased $12.1 million, or 30.6%, to $51.7 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to increased sales and margins, net of increased selling, general and administrative expenses of $3.8 million, to support this growth.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, operating loss for General Company decreased $3.2 million, or 24.4%, to $9.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily due to a $2.8 million reduction in amortization expense related to MIM Acquisition identified intangible assets, such as backlog, which fully amortized in 2006.

Other income (expense)

Other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2007 decreased $10.2 million, or 76.7%, to $3.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily attributable to exchange rate gains recognized in 2006 due to the weakening US dollar relative to the UK pound and related to our US dollar denominated senior secured floating rate notes. The senior secured floating rate notes were repaid in May 2007.

Loss on prepayment of debt

Loss on prepayment of debt of $31.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 resulted from the repayment of the $136.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 9⁷/8% senior secured notes and the $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of our senior secured floating rate notes in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased $14.5 million, or 42.8%, to $48.3 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in interest expense, net was primarily the result of the issuance of our $425 million first lien term loans and $75 million second lien term loan and the repayment of the $130 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured floating rate notes and the $136 million aggregate principal amount of 9⁷/8% senior secured notes in May 2007. The notes we repaid required higher interest payments but on a lower principal balance. The increased interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2007 also reflects interest on increased borrowings during the second half of 2007 under our revolving credit agreement which was used to support increased working capital requirements as a result of our sales growth. Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes $3.9 million of debt issue costs amortization compared to $3.4 million of debt issue costs amortization for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Income tax expense (benefit)

Income tax benefit was $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to an income tax expense of $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The income tax benefit generated during the year ended December 31, 2007 was the result of the loss on the prepayment of our senior secured notes in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007.

Periods January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005, February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and year ended December 31, 2006

The following table provides our statements of operations data for the one month ended January 31, 2005 and the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, and the year ended December 31, 2006.


(millions, except percentages)	Period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005			Period February 1, 2005 December 31, 2005			Year ended December 31, 2006
Sales
Western Hemisphere	$	18.9		$	262.8		$	397.7
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		—			17.1			146.9
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		—			16.1			89.8
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		—			7.4			61.6

Total Eastern Hemisphere		—			40.6			298.3
Eliminations		—			—			(9.1	)

Total	$	18.9		$	303.4		$	686.9

Income (loss) from operations
Western Hemisphere	$	2.2		$	27.9		$	30.4
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		—			2.5			18.4
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		—			3.3			13.3
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		—			0.8			7.9

Total Eastern Hemisphere		—			6.6			39.6
General Company		(12.0	)		(10.0	)		(13.1	)

Total	$	(9.8	)	$	24.5		$	56.9

Income from operations as a % of sales
Western Hemisphere		11.6	%		10.6	%		7.6	%
Eastern Hemisphere
Ÿ UK (Europe/West Africa)		—	%		14.6	%		12.5	%
Ÿ Singapore (Asia/Pacific)		—	%		20.5	%		14.8	%
Ÿ UAE (Middle East)		—	%		10.8	%		12.8	%
Total Eastern Hemisphere		—	%		16.3	%		13.3	%
Total		(51.9	)%		8.1	%		8.3	%

Year ended December 31, 2006

Sales

For the year ended December 31, 2006, our consolidated sales were $686.9 million, which includes eleven months of sales from the operations of the MIM Acquisition, which was acquired on December 15, 2005. Our sales volumes were also positively affected by the increased worldwide demand for oil, natural gas and refined petroleum products, while our sales prices were favorably impacted by improved product/sales mix and by successful price increases, particularly for nickel- and chrome-based products.

In our Western Hemisphere market, the increase in sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005 was primarily the result of increased alloy pipe sales volumes, increased foreign sales, improved pricing, sales in the United States related to the MIM Acquisition and a change in product mix as a result of demand for higher priced seamless products primarily from the oil and natural gas industry. The increased sales were partially offset by reduced sales volumes for stainless and low temperature pipe. General demand for both welded and seamless pipe and for high yield carbon fittings and components provided the basis for sales price increases that offset increased product costs.

Sales in our Eastern Hemisphere market for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflect eleven months of sales from the MIM Acquisition from the period February 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 and were positively impacted by capital expenditures by oil service companies and offshore oil and natural gas structure fabricators.

Income from operations

For the year ended December 31, 2006, consolidated income from operations was $56.9 million and was primarily the result of increased sales from the MIM Acquisition and the non-recurrence of the expenses related to the MIM Acquisition and the Buy-out Transaction.

Income from operations from our Western Hemisphere market remained relatively consistent for the year ended December 31, 2006 relative to the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005 due to sales growth with lower margins, which were the result of a more competitive pricing environment. Income from operations from our Eastern Hemisphere market for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes eleven months of operations compared to the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and was driven by increase sales from the MIM Acquisition.

The General Company expenses of $13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 include amortization expenses related to MIM Acquisition identified intangible assets, such as backlog, which fully amortized in 2006.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes interest expense related to $136.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9⁷/8% senior secured notes and $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured floating rate notes, which notes were outstanding during all of 2006. Interest expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2006 also includes $3.9 million of debt issue cost amortization.

Income tax expense

Income tax expense was $12.9 million or an effective tax rate of 35.4% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The income tax expense and effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects the impact of non-deductible expenses in the United States, which essentially offset the income tax expense in lower tax jurisdictions including the United Kingdom and Singapore.

Period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005

Sales

For the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, our consolidated sales were $303.4 million and reflect increased worldwide demand for oil, natural gas and refined petroleum products. Our sales prices were also favorably impacted by an improved product/sales mix and by successful price increases, particularly for nickel and chrome-based products. Sales also included $25.9 million in sales from the MIM Acquisition and Western Flow Acquisition.

In our Western Hemisphere market, sales were primarily the result of increased alloy pipe sales volumes, increased foreign sales, improved pricing, sales in the United States related to the MIM Acquisition and a change in product mix as a result of demand for higher priced seamless products primarily from the oil and natural gas industry. Sales were partially offset by reduced sales volumes for stainless and low temperature pipe. General demand for both welded and seamless pipe and for high yield carbon fittings and components provided the basis for sales price increases that offset increased product costs.

Sales in our Eastern Hemisphere market for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 reflect only sales for the 45 days from the date of the MIM Acquisition (which occurred on December 16, 2005) through Murray International Metal Limited’s fiscal year end of January 31, 2006.

Income from operations

For the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, consolidated income from operations was $24.5 million. Income from operations was primarily the result of increased sales and associated margins and was partially offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization related to intangibles acquired in the Buy-out Transaction and the MIM Acquisition and Western Flow Acquisitions.

Income from operations from our Eastern Hemisphere market for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, includes 45 days of income from operations from the date of the MIM Acquisition (which occurred on December 16, 2005) through Murray International Metal Limited’s fiscal year end of January 31, 2006.

The General Company expenses of $10.0 million in the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 includes increased amortization expense related to MIM Acquisition identified intangible assets, such as backlog, which fully amortized in 2006.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 was $13.7 million and includes interest expense as a result of the February and December 2005 issuances of $105.0 million and $31.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9⁷/8% senior secured notes, respectively, and $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured floating rate notes in December 2005. Interest expense for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 includes $1.2 million of debt issue costs amortization.

Income tax expense

Income tax expense was $3.3 million or an effective tax rate of 32.2% for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and reflects the impact of taxable income in the United States at the 35% federal rate partially offset by taxable income from the Eastern Hemisphere in lower tax jurisdictions including the United Kingdom and Singapore.

Period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005

Sales

For the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005, sales were $18.9 million and reflect monthly sales.

Loss from operations

For the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005, loss from operations of $9.8 million is primarily the result of General Company expenses of $12.0 million related to the Buy-out Transaction.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net for the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005 includes interest expense related to the Company’ revolving credit agreement as well as $0.1 million of debt issue costs amortization.

Income tax benefit

Income tax benefit was $0.2 million for the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005 and reflects the impact of certain Buy-out Transaction related expenses that were not deductible for income tax purposes resulting in a higher effective tax rate.

Liquidity and capital resources

We finance our operations principally through cash flows generated from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. Our principal liquidity requirements are to meet debt service requirements, finance our capital expenditures and provide working capital. In addition, we may need capital to fund strategic business acquisitions. Our primary source of acquisition funds has historically been the issuance of debt securities, preferred and common equity and cash flows from operations.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. Additionally, provisions of our revolving credit agreement and term loan credit agreements, as well as the laws of the jurisdictions in which our companies are organized, restrict our ability to pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments.

As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our total indebtedness, including capital leases, was $562.0 million and $575.9 million, respectively, which included $42.4 million and $50.8 million, respectively, of borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. As of September 30, 2008, we had approximately $87.7 million available for borrowings, net of reserves, under our revolving credit agreement, after taking into account $42.2 million of outstanding letters of credit and guarantees. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, cash and cash equivalents was $21.4 million and $48.5 million, respectively.

Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flows from operations, available cash and available borrowings under our existing facilities will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months. We cannot assure you, however, that if our business declines we would be able to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us under our revolving credit agreement in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our indebtedness and to meet our other commitments and liquidity needs, we will be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as refinancing or restructuring our indebtedness, selling material assets or operations or raising additional debt or equity capital. We cannot assure you that any of these actions could be effected on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms if at all, or that these actions would enable us to continue to satisfy our capital requirements. In addition, our existing or future debt agreements, including the revolving and term loan credit agreements, may contain provisions prohibiting us from adopting any of these alternatives. Our failure to comply with these provisions could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all of our debt.

Preferred interest and dividends

On February 1, 2005, in connection with the Buy-out Transaction, Edgen Corporation issued $21.6 million of redeemable preferred stock. On December 16, 2005, in connection with the MIM Acquisition, the $21.6 million of redeemable preferred stock, together with accrued dividends of $1.7 million, was exchanged for preferred partnership units in Edgen/Murray, L.P. and $27.3 million in additional Edgen/Murray, L.P. preferred partnership units were issued. The Edgen/Murray, L.P. preferred partnership units had comparable terms to the previously issued redeemable preferred stock of Edgen Corporation including the accumulation of preferred interest at 8.5% per annum. However, because the preferred partnership units were not redeemable, they were classified in the equity section of the balance sheet instead of the mezzanine section. No gain or loss was recognized on the exchange because the exchange ratio was set so that the fair value of the preferred partnership units issued in the exchange would be equal to the fair value of the redeemable preferred stock surrendered in the exchange. In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, all of the assets of Edgen/Murray, L.P. were distributed to its partners, the partners agreed to dissolve Edgen/Murray, L.P. and, upon dissolution, the preferred partnership units were extinguished at no additional cost. No gain or loss was recognized because the Recapitalization Transaction was accounted for as a business combination of entities under common control for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, we maintained the historical carryover basis of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in accordance with SFAS 141. Preferred interest and dividends totaled $2.1 million for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005. Preferred interest and dividends totaled $4.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $1.7 million for the period January 1, 2007 to May 10, 2007. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Our history and formation.”

Statement of cash flow data


(dollars in millions)	Period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005			Period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005			Year ended December 31, 2006			Year ended December 31, 2007			Nine months ended September 30,
(dollars in millions)	Period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005			Period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005			Year ended December 31, 2006			Year ended December 31, 2007			2007			2008
Cash flows provided by (used in) activities:
Operating	$	4.3		$	32.0		$	(8.5	)	$	(8.5	)	$	(18.3	)	$	(9.8	)
Investing		—			(281.7	)		(14.5	)		(36.2	)		(35.4	)		(9.0	)
Financing		(1.5	)		290.5			(2.3	)		77.4			84.6			(6.6	)

Nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2008

Operating activities. Net cash outflows from operating activities were $9.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net cash outflows of $18.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The overall reduction in cash outflows from operations was primarily the result of the increase in net income before non-cash charges offset by an increase in working capital requirements as a result of sales growth. Cash generated from operating activities before working capital requirements was $70.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $46.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Investing activities. Net cash outflows from investing activities were $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net cash outflows of $35.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Cash outflows from investing activities of $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 include capital expenditures of $5.1 million related to continued expansion and improvement of our warehouse facilities, renovations of certain sales and administrative offices, and information technology initiatives to support our sales, operating and administrative activities. In addition to the capital expenditures, we also made a $4.0 million earn-out payment to the former owners of PetroSteel. Cash outflows of $35.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 include cash paid for the PetroSteel acquisition of $24.7 million and capital expenditures of $4.7 million.

Financing activities. Net cash outflows from financing activities were $6.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net cash inflows of $84.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Cash outflows from financing activities of $6.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 include net principal payments associated with the revolving credit agreement, principal payments on our term loans, and inflows from other short-term loans. In August 2008, we exercised the $25.0 million accordion feature of the revolving credit agreement. This transaction provided us the ability to issue an additional $25.0 million of letters of credit, guarantees and similar instruments. Availability under our revolving credit agreement was $87.3 million at September 30, 2008 compared to $58.2 million at December 31, 2007. Cash inflows from financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 reflect the net cash proceeds associated with the Recapitalization Transaction, which include proceeds from the issuance of an aggregate of $500.0 million of first and second lien term loans and the issuance of common units for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $155.0 million, minus the payment of related deferred financing costs, the prepayment of $136.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9⁷/8% senior secured notes and $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured floating rate notes, and the distributions to unitholders on May 11, 2007.

Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to year ended December 31, 2007

Operating activities. Net cash outflows from operating activities of $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 were unchanged from net cash outflows from operating activities of $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The net cash outflows from operations in both years was primarily the result of working capital requirements to support sales growth.

Investing activities. Net cash outflows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $36.2 million include the $24.6 million cash purchase price of the PetroSteel acquisition, the $6.1 million cash purchase price of the EVS acquisition, and capital expenditures of $5.5 million related to the continued capital maintenance and improvement of our warehouse facilities, renovations of certain sales and administrative offices, and investments in information technologies to support our sales, operating and administrative activities. Net cash outflows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2006 of $14.5 million include $12.3 million of additional purchase price related to the MIM Acquisition and capital expenditures of $2.0 million related to the continued capital maintenance and improvement of our facilities.

Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $77.4 million includes the cash inflows and outflows associated with the Recapitalization Transaction, which include cash inflows from the incurrence of an aggregate of $500.0 million of first and second lien term loans and the issuance of common units for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $155.0 million, minus cash outflows from the prepayment of $136.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9⁷/ 8% senior secured notes and $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured floating rate notes, and the payment of related deferred financing costs. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the first lien term loans were reduced by principal payments of $2.1 million. Net cash outflows from financing of $2.3 million were primarily due to a decrease in managed cash overdraft for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Year Ended December 31, 2006

Operating activities. Cash outflows from operating activities were $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and were primarily attributable to working capital requirements to support growth in sales for both our Western and Eastern Hemisphere markets during 2006. Cash outflows from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2006 also include $28.3 million in interest payments on our 9⁷/8% senior secured notes, including the additional notes issued in connection with the MIM Acquisition, and our senior secured floating rate notes issued in connection with the MIM Acquisition.

Investing activities. Net cash outflows from investing activities of $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 were primarily due to $12.7 million of final purchase price payments related to the MIM Acquisition and Western Flow acquisition and capital expenditures of $2.0 million.

Financing activities. Net cash outflows from financing activities were $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 primarily related to the repayment of managed cash overdrafts.

Period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005

Operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 of $32.0 million was primarily the result of period earnings and a decrease in net working capital requirements. Cash provided by operating activities for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 includes cash generated from subsidiaries we acquired in the MIM Acquisition for the 45 day period from the December 16, 2005 date of acquisition through their then fiscal year end of January 31.

Investing activities. Net cash outflows from investing activities were $281.7 million for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and were primarily due to purchase price payments related to the Buy-out Transaction, the Western Flow acquisition and the MIM Acquisition.

Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the period February 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 of $290.5 million includes the issuance of 9⁷/8% senior secured notes for $134.6 million, net of discount, the issuance of senior secured floating rate notes for $130.0 million and the issuance of common and preferred units with proceeds of $53.0 million in connection with the Buy-out Transaction. The proceeds from the Buy-out Transaction were partially offset by the payment of financing fees related to the issuance of the 9⁷/8% senior secured notes, our entry into a new revolving credit agreement, and a $5.1 million payment to extinguish debt assumed in the MIM Acquisition.

Period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005

Operating activities. Cash inflows from operating activities were $4.3 million for the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005 and reflects a net loss resulting from Buy-out Transaction expenses of $12.0 million which were accrued at January 31, 2005 and reflected in the increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities for the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005.

Investing and financing activities. Net cash outflows from investing activities of less than $0.1 million and net cash outflow from financial activities of $1.5 million had a minimal impact on total cash flows for the period January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2005.

Debt

Revolving Credit Agreement. On May 11, 2007, we entered into a new revolving credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the other financial institutions party thereto. The revolving credit agreement is a $175.0 million global credit facility, of which:

•

Edgen Murray Corporation, which we refer to as “EMC,” may utilize up to $165.0 million less any amounts utilized under the sub-limits of Edgen Murray Canada Inc., which we refer to as “EM Canada,” and Edgen Murray Europe Limited, which we refer to as “EM Europe”;

•

EM Europe may utilize up to $50.0 million plus an additional amount equal to EMC’s unused availability minus $15.0 million;

•

EM Canada may utilize up to $7.5 million; and

•

Edgen Murray Pte. Ltd., which we refer to as “EM Singapore,” may utilize up to $10.0 million.

Credit availability for each subsidiary is calculated based on a percentage of eligible trade accounts receivable and inventories, subject to adjustments and sub-limits as defined by the revolving credit agreement. The subsidiaries may utilize the revolving credit agreement for borrowings as well as for the issuance of bank guarantees and letters of credit as defined by the revolving credit agreement.

Revolving borrowings under our revolving credit agreement bear interest at variable rates of Alternate Base Rate, Adjusted LIBOR, Banker’s Acceptance Rate, UK Base Rate, Canadian Prime Rate, Singapore Base Rate or UAE Base Rate, in each case plus a percentage spread that varies from 0.50% to 2.50% based on the type of borrowing and our average borrowing availability.

The revolving credit agreement is guaranteed by Edgen Murray II, L.P., which we refer to as “Holdings,” and Edgen Murray LLC. Additionally, each of the EM Canada sub-facility, the EM Europe sub-facility and the EM Singapore sub-facility is guaranteed by Edgen Murray Cayman Corporation, which we refer to as “EM Cayman,” Pipe Acquisition Limited, EM Europe, EM Canada and EM Singapore, as applicable. The revolving credit agreement is secured by a first priority security interest in all of the working capital assets, including trade accounts receivable and inventories, of the borrowers and of the guarantors under the revolving credit agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of an intercreditor agreement, the security interest in the working capital collateral that secures our term loans and related guarantees described below is contractually subordinated to the liens securing the revolving credit agreement and related guarantees.

As of September 30, 2008, the outstanding balance for cash borrowings under the revolving credit agreement was $42.4 million which consisted of balances outstanding at EMC, EM Canada and EM Europe of $35.0 million, $3.4 million and $4.0 million, respectively, at weighted average interest rates of 4.85%, 5.22% and 5.85%, respectively. Outstanding letters of credit totaled $42.2 million, which consisted of letters of credit outstanding for EMC, EM Europe and EM Singapore of $17.0 million, $18.1 million and $7.1 million, respectively. EMC’s outstanding letter of credit balance includes a letter of credit issued in the amount of $11.2 million that supports the local credit facility of Edgen Murray FZE, which we refer to as “EM FZE.” Total remaining availability, net of reserves, under the revolving credit agreement at September 30, 2008 was $87.7 million.

The revolving credit agreement contains a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.00 that applies if our aggregate availability is reduced below $25.0 million, or the sum of EMC and EM Canada availability is less than $15.0 million until the date that both aggregate availability is greater than $30.0 million and the sum of EMC and EM Canada availability is greater than $20.0 million for a consecutive ninety day period, and no default or event of default exists or has existed during the period. The fixed charge coverage ratio is a ratio of our earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization, and income taxes (“EBITDA”), subject to certain specific adjustments, as more specifically defined in the revolving credit agreement, minus capital expenditures and cash taxes to the sum of our cash interest expense, scheduled principal payments, cash management fees, dividends and distributions and cash earnout or similar payments.

The revolving credit agreement also contains other affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others, limitations on:

•

the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens;

•

the payment of dividends and distributions;

•

the making of investments, loans and advances;

•

transactions with affiliates; and

•

mergers and the sale of assets.

Under the revolving credit agreement, our first-tier operating companies, EMC and EM Europe, may pay dividends and make distributions to Holdings, directly or indirectly, to the extent Holdings uses such dividends or distributions to (1) repurchase its equity interests from present and former directors, officers and employees (subject to a $2.0 million cap), (2) pay management fees to JCP and (3) pay its corporate overhead and operating expenses. EMC and EM Europe may also pay dividends and make distributions to Holdings, directly or indirectly, so long as no default has occurred which is continuing and the availability of EMC and the availability of EM Europe, respectively, is not less than $15.0 million. Holdings may pay dividends from the amounts received from its subsidiaries so long as no default has occurred which is continuing and aggregate availability is at least $40.0 million.

The revolving credit agreement permits us to allocate cash flow and resources freely among (1) the parent entities of EMC and EM Europe, (2) EMC and its US subsidiaries, (3) the Canadian loan parties, (4) the UK loan parties, (5) the Singapore loan parties, (6) the UAE loan parties and (7) subject to various availability thresholds and caps, among all loan parties and otherwise by any loan party in or to any other person.

As of September 30, 2008, the fixed charge coverage ratio did not apply because our aggregate availability exceeded the applicable thresholds, and we were in compliance with the other affirmative and negative covenants of the revolving credit agreement.

EM FZE Local Facility. EM FZE has a $15.0 million credit facility with local lenders in Dubai, which is currently secured by a letter of credit in the amount of $11.2 million issued under our revolving credit agreement. Borrowings on the local facility bear interest at the prevailing Dubai interbank rate plus a margin of 1.5%. EM FZE may utilize the local facility for borrowings, foreign exchange, letters of credit, bank guarantees and other permitted indebtedness. This facility is primarily used for the issuance of letters of credit to support the trade activity of EM FZE. As of September 30, 2008, there were no borrowings and approximately $10.2 million in outstanding letters of credit issued under the local facility.

First Lien Term Loan and Second Lien Term Loan Agreements. On May 11, 2007, Holdings, EMC and EM Cayman entered into a first lien term loan credit agreement with Lehman Brothers Inc., Jefferies Finance LLC, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., and certain other financial institutions. Also on May 11, 2007, Holdings and EMC entered into a second lien term loan credit agreement with Lehman Brothers Inc., Jefferies Finance LLC, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., and certain other financial institutions. Under the first lien term loan credit agreement, EMC incurred $280.0 million of first lien term loans and EM Cayman incurred $145.0 million of first lien term loans. Under the second lien term loan credit agreement, EMC incurred a $75.0 million second lien term loan.

The term loans bear interest at a floating rate equal to the base rate, which is defined as the higher of the applicable prime rate or 0.50% above the federal funds effective rate, in effect from time to time plus an applicable margin, or the reserve adjusted eurodollar rate in effect from time to time plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin for

the first lien term loans is 1.75% for base rate loans and 2.75% for eurodollar rate loans. The applicable margin for the second lien term loan is 5.25% and 6.25% for base rate and eurodollar rate loans, respectively, if our consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 4.00 to 1.00, or 5.00% and 6.00% for base rate and eurodollar rate loans, respectively, if our consolidated leverage ratio is less than 4.00 to 1.00. As of September 30, 2008, the weighted average interest rate was 6.08%, without taking into account any interest rate swaps.

Beginning in 2009, the term loans require mandatory annual principal prepayments from excess cash flow, as defined by the term loan agreements, for the previous fiscal year. Such mandatory prepayments are required to be paid within five days of the issuance of our audited financial statements, which must be issued within ninety days after our fiscal year end.

Holdings, EMC and its domestic subsidiaries jointly and severally, unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee all the first and second lien term loans incurred by EMC. These loans are secured by a security interest in:

•

all trade accounts receivable and inventories, investment property, general intangibles and cash deposit accounts of Holdings, EMC and its domestic subsidiaries;

•

100% of the capital stock of EMC and its domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the capital stock of EMC’s first tier foreign subsidiaries; and

•

all other tangible and intangible assets of Holdings, EMC and its domestic subsidiaries.

Holdings, EMC and its domestic subsidiaries, EM Canada, EM Europe and its subsidiaries jointly and severally, unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee all of the first lien term loans incurred by EM Cayman. These loans are secured by a security interest in:

•

all trade accounts receivable and inventories, investment property, general intangibles and cash deposit accounts of Holdings, EMC and its domestic subsidiaries, EM Canada, EM Europe and its subsidiaries;

•

100% of the capital stock of EMC and its domestic subsidiaries, EM Canada, EM Europe and its subsidiaries; and

•

all other tangible and intangible assets of Holdings, EMC and its domestic subsidiaries, EM Canada, EM Europe and its subsidiaries.

Pursuant to the terms of an intercreditor agreement, the security interest in the working capital collateral that secures the first and second lien term loans and related guarantees is contractually subordinated to the liens securing our revolving credit agreement and related guarantees.

The term loan credit agreements contain a maximum leverage ratio of not more than 5.50 to 1.00 through September 30, 2008, 5.00 to 1.00 through September 30, 2009, and 4.50 to 1.00 thereafter. The leverage ratio is a ratio of our net debt (total debt less cash on hand) to our earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization and income taxes, subject to certain specific adjustments as more specifically defined in the term loan credit agreements. As of September 30, 2008, our leverage ratio was 3.49 to 1.00.

The term loan credit agreements also contain other affirmative and negative covenants, including, among others, limitations on:

•

the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens;

•

the payment of dividends and distributions;

•

the making of investments, loans and advances;

•

transactions with affiliates;

•

dispositions and mergers; and

•

the sale of assets.

The term loans permit any domestic subsidiary to pay dividends and make distributions to Holdings, EMC and any other US subsidiary that has guaranteed all of the obligations and permits any foreign subsidiary to pay dividends and make distributions to Holdings, EM Cayman and any other foreign subsidiary that has guaranteed the foreign obligations. EMC and EM Cayman may pay dividends to Holdings in respect of their allocable portion of net income to permit Holdings to (1) repurchase its equity interests from present and former directors, officers and employees

(subject to a $2.0 million cap) and (2) pay management fees to JCP. EMC and EM Cayman also may pay dividends to Holdings to permit Holdings to pay its corporate overhead and operating expenses (subject to a $2.5 million cap in any fiscal year). The term loans do not permit Holdings to pay dividends.

The term loans permit us to allocate cash flow and resources freely among any loan party and its subsidiaries (so long as that subsidiary is a guarantor).

As a result, these agreements restrict substantially all of the net assets of our subsidiaries, except for nominal amounts allowed for under the agreements, and, except for transfers among EMC and its related group of subsidiaries and EM Cayman and its related group of subsidiaries, respectively, effectively prohibit the transfer of funds in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances without the consent of our lenders. Accordingly, substantially all of our retained earnings are restricted by these agreements.

As of September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with the affirmative and negative covenants contained in the term loan credit agreements, including the maximum leverage ratio covenant.

Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement and Term Loan Agreements. On September 17, 2008 and September 12, 2008, we entered into amendments to our revolving credit agreement and term loan agreements, respectively. The amendments provide that, effective upon the Contribution, Edgen Murray Limited will be substituted for Holdings under the agreements such that Edgen Murray Limited (along with each direct or indirect holding company of EMC and EM Cayman) will guarantee and provide security for all of the obligations under the agreements. The amendments also permit the possible transfer of EM Singapore and EM FZE from EM Europe to Edgen Murray Limited, a direct or indirect holding company of EMC and EM Cayman or another permitted loan party. In addition, the amendment to the revolving credit agreement added EM FZE as a borrower with a $15.0 million sub-limit.

Note Payable to Sellers of PetroSteel. In connection with the PetroSteel acquisition, EMC issued a three-year, $4.0 million subordinated note to the sellers of PetroSteel, with principal and interest due May 2011. The note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum compounded annually.

Newbridge, Scotland facility lease. In connection with the MIM Acquisition on December 16, 2005, EM Europe sold land, an office building and two warehouses at its Newbridge location for $23.0 million, less fees of approximately $0.3 million. Concurrent with the sale, EM Europe entered into an agreement to lease back all of the sold property for an initial lease term of 25 years. Under the lease agreement, the initial term will be extended for two further terms of ten years each unless cancelled by EM Europe. The lease is being accounted for as a capital lease because the net present value of the future minimum lease payments exceed 90% of the fair value of the leased asset. The lease requires an annual rental payment of £1.2 million, or $2.4 million (at December 31, 2007 exchange rates), which is subject to adjustment based on the UK consumer price index on the fifth anniversary of the inception of the lease and every two years thereafter, and payment of customary operating and repair expenses. Pipe Acquisition Limited entered into a guarantee in respect of the obligations of EM Europe under the lease.

Third party guarantees

In the normal course of business, EMC and EM Europe provide performance guarantees directly to third parties on behalf of our subsidiaries. For guarantees that expire within one year, the maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) for non-performance totaled $10.1 million and $14.8 million at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, respectively. For guarantees that do not have an expiration date, the maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) for non-performance totaled $21.8 million and $14.1 million at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, respectively.

Commitments and contractual obligations

Our contractual obligations and commitments principally include obligations associated with our outstanding indebtedness and future minimum operating lease obligations as set forth in the following tables as of December 31, 2007:


	Actual payments due by period ending December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2008		2009 and 2010		2011 and 2012		2013 and thereafter		Total
Contractual obligations
Long term debt ⁽¹⁾	$	49.0	$	101.4	$	144.9	$	531.2	$	826.5
Capital lease ⁽²⁾		2.4		4.8		4.8		43.6		55.6
Operating lease obligations		3.3		4.6		3.1		1.0		12.0
Derivative instruments —
Foreign currency exchange contracts ⁽³⁾		70.3		—		—		—		70.3
Interest rate swaps/collar		0.7		1.1		—		—		1.8
Purchase commitments ⁽⁴⁾		322.4		—		—		—		322.4


Total	$	448.1	$	111.9	$	152.8	$	575.8	$	1,288.6

(1)

Includes interest obligations on our first and second lien term loans at an interest rate of 7.75% and 11.14% per annum, respectively, at an assumed three-month eurodollar weighted average rate. Also includes $50.8 million of borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit agreement and $4.2 million under our note payable to the sellers of PetroSteel at December 31, 2007. We intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering for the repayment of approximately $ million of our first lien term loans. See “Use of proceeds.”

(2)	Includes interest obligations under our Newbridge, Scotland facility capital lease at 9.16%, the implicit interest rate.

(3)	Represents the notional value of foreign currency contracts to purchase and sell foreign currencies at specified forward rates in connection with our foreign currency hedging policy.

(4)	Includes purchase commitments for inventory. We enter into purchase commitments on as-needed basis, typically daily, but these commitments generally do not extend beyond one year.

Recent accounting pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements, known as Statements of Financial Accounting Standards or “SFAS,” are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). These pronouncements are adopted by us as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes the impact of recently issued standards which are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) Business Combinations, which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. Under SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on our results of operations or financial condition.

SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140, which amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS No. 155 resolves issues addressed in SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. SFAS No. 155 is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a frame-work for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to fair value measurements that are already required or permitted by existing standards except for measurements of share based payments and measurements that are similar to, but not intended to be, fair value. SFAS No. 157 does not impose any additional fair value measurements in financial statements and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB issued a one-year deferral of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except those that are recorded or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an amendment to FASB Statement No. 115. In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment to FASB Statement No. 15, which became effective for us on January 1, 2008. This standard gives us the option to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. We did not elect the fair value option for any additional financial instruments or other items.

SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51, effective for us on January 1, 2009. Ownership interests in subsidiaries held by third parties, which are currently referred to as minority interests, will be presented as noncontrolling interests and shown separately within equity on the consolidated balance sheet. Any changes in our ownership interests while control is retained will be treated as equity transactions. In addition, this standard requires presentation and disclosure of the allocation between controlling and noncontrolling interests’ income from continuing operations, discontinued operations and comprehensive income, and a reconciliation of changes in the consolidated statement of equity during the reporting period. The presentation and disclosure requirements of the standard will be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. All other requirements will be applied prospectively. We are evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 160 might have on our consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 achieves these improvements by requiring disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. It also provides more information about an entity’s liquidity by requiring disclosure of derivative features that are credit risk-related. Finally, it requires cross-referencing within footnotes to enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) SFAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Assets. The intent of FSP SFAS No. 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of recognized intangible assets under SFAS No. 142 and the

period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141R (revised 2007), Business Combinations, and other applicable accounting literature. FSP SFAS No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of FSP SFAS No. 142-3 on our consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 162, Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This statement will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendment to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 162 on our consolidated financial statements.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

In the normal course of business, we are a party to certain off-balance sheet arrangements. These arrangements include guarantees and financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, such as bank letters of credit. No liabilities related to these arrangements are reflected in our consolidated balance sheet, and we do not expect any material adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements.

As of December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, we had $28.2 million and $42.2 million of letters of credit outstanding, respectively. For guarantees that expire within one year, the maximum potential amount of future payments for non-performance totaled $10.1 million and $14.8 million at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, respectively. For guarantees that do not have an expiration date, the maximum potential amount of future payments for non-performance totaled $21.8 million and $14.1 million at December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, respectively.

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk

In the normal course of operations, we are exposed to market risks arising from adverse changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Market risk is defined for these purposes as the potential change in the fair value of financial assets or liabilities resulting from an adverse movement in interest rates or foreign exchange rates.

Management is responsible for raising financing for operations, together with associated liquidity management, and the management of foreign exchange and interest rate risk. Our treasury operations are conducted under the oversight of management, who receive regular updates of treasury activity. Financial instruments are entered into for risk management purposes only. Our policy on foreign exchange rate hedging requires that only known, firm commitments are hedged and that no trading in financial instruments is undertaken.

Our principal risks are exposures to changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. These risks are closely monitored and evaluated by appropriate management. Following evaluation of those positions, we selectively enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures related to currency exchange rate changes and changes in interest rates.

Interest rate risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk related to changes in interest rates on our variable rate debt. At September 30, 2008, we had approximately $537.1 million of debt outstanding under our first and second lien term loans and revolving credit agreements, all of which is subject to variable rate interest rates. If interest rates increased by 100 basis points, our annual cash interest expense would increase by approximately $5.4 million, not taking into consideration the effect of the interest rate swaps discussed below.

In order to mitigate the interest rate risk related to a portion of our variable rate debt, we have entered into three interest rate swap agreements. Under these agreements, we pay fixed interest rates for varying periods and receive floating interest rate payments. Our interest rate swaps are based on the 3-month LIBOR. These swaps have notional

values of $175.0 million, $100.0 million and $75.0 million with fixed interest rates of 5.15%, 4.88% and 5.19%, respectively. Based upon current variable rate debt outstanding, if interest rates increased by 100 basis points, our annual cash interest expense would increase by $1.8 million after taking into consideration the effect of these interest rate swaps. The weighted average interest rate on these borrowings, net of the impact of interest rate swaps, at September 30, 3008 was 5.54%. These three interest rate swaps will terminate on August 13, 2009. We plan to repay a portion of our first lien term loans with the net proceeds to us from this offering. See “Use of proceeds”.

The Company has also entered in an interest rate swap that will begin on August 13, 2009 and will convert a notional principal of $75.0 million under its first lien term loan from floating interest rate to fixed interest rate payments with a contract to pay fixed rates of interest of 4.88% while simultaneously receiving floating rate interest payments set at the applicable three-month LIBOR on the same notional amount. This interest rate swap is scheduled to terminate on August 17, 2010.

Additionally, we entered into an interest rate collar with a notional principal amount of $100 million related to our first lien term loans which allows us to incur a floating rate of interest on the outstanding notional amount within a specified range. The collar swaps floating three-month LIBOR for fixed rates whenever the floating rate exceeds the cap rate of 5.50% or falls below the floor rate of 4.88%. The interest rate collar term begins on August 13, 2009 and is scheduled to terminate on August 17, 2010.

The Company also entered into an interest rate swap that converts an aggregate notional principal of $75.0 million under its second lien term loan from floating to fixed interest rate payments. As of September 30, 2008, interest rate payments under the second lien term loan were set at 9.06% including the applicable spread of 6.25%. Under this transaction, the Company pays a fixed rate of interest on an aggregate notional principal amount of $75.0 million of 5.19%, while simultaneously receiving a floating rate interest payment currently set at 2.69% on the same notional amount. This interest rate swap is scheduled to terminate on August 17, 2010.

Borrowings under EM FZE’s credit facility with local lenders in Dubai bear interest at the prevailing Dubai interbank rate plus a margin of 1.5%. This facility is supported by a letter of credit in the amount of $11.2 million issued under our revolving credit agreement. This local facility is primarily used for the issuance of letters of credit for trade purposes. As of September 30, 2008, there were no outstanding cash borrowings on this facility.

Management continuously monitors the exposure related to the first and second lien term loans, as well as exposure under our revolving credit agreement and local credit facility in Dubai.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The table below provides information about the Company’s derivative financial instruments and other financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, including interest rate swaps and debt obligations. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by expected (contractual) maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. Weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve at the reporting date. The information is presented in US dollar equivalents, which is the Company’s reporting currency. The instrument’s actual cash flows are denominated in US dollars.


	Expected Maturity Date
(dollars in thousands, except percentages)	2008		2009		2010		2011		2012		Thereafter		Total	Fair Value
Long term debt
Fixed rate	18		20		4,210		—		—		—		4,248	4,248
Average interest rate	7.25	%	7.25	%	8.00	%	—		—		—
Variable Rate	4,250		4,250		4,250		4,250		62,677		469,045		548,722	519,780
Average interest rate	7.75	%	7.75	%	7.75	%	7.75	%	7.67	%	8.36	%

Interest rate derivatives
Interest rate swaps and collar	—		5,433		4,359		—		—		—		9,792	9,792
Variable to fixed⁽¹⁾
Average pay rate	5.08	%	6.34	%	7.79	%	—		—		—
Average receive rate	4.88	%	5.78	%	6.34	%	—		—		—

⁽¹⁾	The 2009 and 2010 pay/receive rates exclude the interest rate collar which begins on August 13, 2009 and is scheduled to terminate on August 17, 2010.

Foreign currency risk

We assess currency exchange exposure on certain monetary assets and liabilities and enter into financial instruments as we believe is necessary to manage this risk. During the normal course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency risk. These risks can create volatility in earnings and cash flows from year to year. We use derivative financial instruments to reduce exposure to foreign currency movements on foreign currency purchases and sales.

In our business, we may enter into purchase and sales commitments that are denominated in a foreign currency (primarily the Euro). Our practices include entering into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to minimize foreign currency exposure related to forecasted purchases and sales of certain inventories. These risks can create volatility in earnings and cash flows from year to year. We use derivative financial instruments to reduce exposure to foreign currency movements on foreign currency purchases and sales. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

The fair value of these foreign currency forward derivative contracts was a liability of $2.1 million and an asset of $0.1 million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the total notional amount of outstanding currency exchange contracts was $55.5 million and $70.3 million, respectively.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

The table below provides information about the Company’s derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments, and firmly committed sales and purchase transactions by functional currency and presents such information in US dollar equivalents. The table summarizes information on instruments and transactions that are sensitive to foreign currency exchange rates, including foreign currency forward exchange agreements, and firmly committed US dollars, UK pounds, UAE dirhams, Euro, Singapore dollars, and Australian dollars sales and purchase transactions. For firmly committed sales and purchase transactions, sales and purchase amounts are presented by the expected transaction date, which are not expected to exceed one year. For foreign currency forward exchange agreements, the table presents the notional amounts and weighted average exchange rates by expected contractual maturity dates. These notional amounts generally are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract.


	Expected Maturity Date
	2008		2009	2010	2011	2012	Thereafter	Total		Fair Value
On balance sheet financial instruments (in dollars)
US dollars functional currency
Asset	307,949		—	—	—	—	—	307,949		307,949
Liability	(302,544	)	—	—	—	—	—	(302,544	)	(302,544	)
UK Pounds functional currency
Asset	120,713		—	—	—	—	—	120,713		120,713
Liability	(113,646	)	—	—	—	—	—	(113,646	)	(113,646	)
UAE dirhams functional currency
Asset	515,217		—	—	—	—	—	515,217		515,217
Liability	(128,424	)	—	—	—	—	—	(128,424	)	(128,424	)

Anticipated transactions and related derivatives
US dollars functional currency
Firmly committed transactions:
Sales	13,457,996		—	—	—	—	—	13,457,996		—
Purchase orders	(47,592,465	)	—	—	—	—	—	(47,592,465	)	—
Forward exchange agreements:
Receive $/pay Euro - by currency	(3,125,616	)	—	—	—	—	—	(3,125,616	)	—
Contract amount ($)	4,362,416		—	—	—	—	—	4,362,416		(247,607	)
Average contractual exchange rate	1.40		—	—	—	—	—	1.40		—
Pay $/Receive Euro - by currency	31,527,669		—	—	—	—	—	31,527,669		—
Contract amount ($)	(44,939,471	)	—	—	—	—	—	(44,939,471	)	303,396
Average contractual exchange rate	1.42		—	—	—	—	—	1.42		—


	Expected Maturity Date
	2008		2009	2010	2011	2012	Thereafter	Total		Fair Value
Pay $/Receive £ - by currency	761,413		—	—	—	—	—	761,413		—
Contract amount ($)	(1,568,993	)	—	—	—	—	—	(1,568,993	)	(48,938	)
Average contractual exchange rate	2.06		—	—	—	—	—	2.06		—
Receive $/pay AU$ - by currency	(196,730	)	—	—	—	—	—	(196,730	)	—
Contract amount ($)	172,858		—	—	—	—	—	172,858		(269	)
Average contractual exchange rate	0.88		—	—	—	—	—	0.88		—
Pay $/receive AU$ - by currency	24,217		—	—	—	—	—	24,217		—
Contract amount ($)	(21,309	)	—	—	—	—	—	(21,309	)	11
Average contractual exchange rate	0.88		—	—	—	—	—	0.88		—
Receive $/pay S$ - by currency	(43,051	)	—	—	—	—	—	(43,051	)	—
Contract amount ($)	29,752		—	—	—	—	—	29,752		(200	)
Average contractual exchange rate	1.45		—	—	—	—	—	1.45		—
Pay $/receive S$ - by currency	384,478		—	—	—	—	—	384,478		—
Contract amount ($)	(267,961	)	—	—	—	—	—	(267,961	)	(987	)
Average contractual exchange rate	1.43		—	—	—	—	—	1.43		—
UK pounds functional currency
Firmly committed transactions:
Sales	2,379,715		—	—	—	—	—	2,379,715		—
Purchase orders	(3,986,095	)	—	—	—	—	—	(3,986,095	)	—
Forward exchange agreements:
Receive £/pay Euro - by currency	(2,699,624	)	—	—	—	—	—	(2,699,624	)	—
Contract amount (£)	1,888,749		—	—	—	—	—	1,888,749		(95,670	)
Average contractual exchange rate	1.43		—	—	—	—	—	1.43		—
Pay £/receive Euro - by currency	3,247,863		—	—	—	—	—	3,247,863		—
Contract amount (£)	(2,268,709	)	—	—	—	—	—	(2,268,709	)	119,960
Average contractual exchange rate	1.43		—	—	—	—	—	1.43		—
Receive £/pay $ - by currency	(641,019	)	—	—	—	—	—	(641,019	)	—
Contract amount (£)	310,053		—	—	—	—	—	310,053		(9,858	)
Average contractual exchange rate	2.07		—	—	—	—	—	2.07		—
Pay £/Receive $ - by currency	3,062,600		—	—	—	—	—	3,062,600		—
Contract amount (£)	(1,536,473	)	—	—	—	—	—	(1,536,473	)	(7,365	)
Average contractual exchange rate	1.99		—	—	—	—	—	1.99		—
UAE dirhams functional currency
Firmly committed transactions:
Sales	—		—	—	—	—	—	—		—
Purchase orders	(25,380,936	)	—	—	—	—	—	(25,380,936	)	—
Forward exchange agreements:
Pay AED/receive Euro - by currency	3,950,277		—	—	—	—	—	3,950,277		—
Contract amount (AED)	(20,880,809	)	—	—	—	—	—	(20,880,809	)	491,734
Average contractual exchange rate	5.29		—	—	—	—	—	5.29		—
Pay AED/receive £ - by currency	596,663		—	—	—	—	—	596,663		—
Contract amount (AED)	(4,500,128	)	—	—	—	—	—	(4,500,128	)	(104,941	)
Average contractual exchange rate	7.54		—	—	—	—	—	7.54		—

As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 13% of our revenues and 11% of our total assets were denominated in UK pounds, our functional currency in the United Kingdom. As a result, a material decrease in the value of the UK pound relative to the US dollar may negatively impact our revenues, cash flows and net income.

Credit risk

Our credit risk on liquid resources and derivative financial instruments is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies. We have no significant concentration of credit risk with a specific counterparty because exposure is spread over a number of counterparties.

Business

Overview

We are a leading global distributor of specialty steel products primarily to energy infrastructure markets. The products we distribute include highly-engineered prime carbon or alloy steel pipe, pipe components, valves and high-grade structural sections and plate. These items are often designed to operate in severe conditions (including high pressure and extreme temperature environments) or to withstand the effects of corrosive or abrasive materials. We maintain a broad product offering of more than 14,000 products currently on hand and manage a large inventory of valves, components and more than 100,000 tons of specialty pipes, plate and sections.

Our global sales and distribution network enables us to efficiently procure and deliver our entire product offering worldwide. We stock and distribute inventory and support our customers through a global network of facilities located on four continents. This allows us to service projects in remote and challenging locations, while also supporting the daily MRO requirements of installed facilities. We employ experienced local market specialists and sales personnel, many of whom have technical backgrounds, training or relevant industry experience, in all of the regions in which we operate. To augment our extensive product line, we offer our customers specialized product knowledge, technical consultation, global logistical support and project management and procurement services. These services include inventory management and just-in-time product delivery, which results in product delivery to our customers when they are ready to use it so they can reduce their inventory carrying costs. We have a broad customer base of more than 2,750 customers and deliver our products in more than 50 countries.

We distribute and market our products to companies throughout the energy industry. We supply our products to fabricators, contractors, owners and operators engaged in the development of new energy infrastructure projects and the MRO of existing facilities. Our customers include “upstream” oil and natural gas exploration and production companies, “midstream” gathering and transmission, pipeline and storage companies, “downstream” refining and processing companies, power generation companies and engineering and construction firms. We also supply our products, on a more limited basis, to chemical, petrochemical, mining and alternative energy companies. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 79% of our total revenue was attributable to customers that operate in or service the energy infrastructure markets and, within those markets, approximately 62% of our total revenue was attributable to customers that operate in or service the oil and natural gas industry.

We separate our business into two geographic markets — the Western Hemisphere and the Eastern Hemisphere. We are capable of offering our complete product line in both markets. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 34% of our revenue was from the Eastern Hemisphere market and 66% was from the Western Hemisphere market.

We believe we are a critical link between our customers and product manufacturers (our vendors). Many of our customers rely on us to source products for them as they may not have the expertise, relationships, resources, volume or logistical capabilities to complete procurement independently or on a cost-effective basis. We are able to supply products that are generally not otherwise available on a quick-response basis or in our customers’ desired timeframe. Additionally, we are able to complete orders in smaller quantities than would be readily available for direct purchase from manufacturers, benefiting both our customers and our vendors. We believe our global scale and purchasing power have allowed us to establish strong ties and preferential purchasing terms with our vendors. We also provide support to our vendors through our sales, marketing and credit functions, with respect to the products we distribute.

Industry trends

Over the past decade, both vendors and end users have increasingly focused on efficiently managing their sales and supply chains, often by using distributors like us. There has been significant consolidation among our vendors, and this consolidation has led to a greater focus on core competencies of production and product development rather than sales, marketing and logistics. As a result, many of our vendors are more reliant on distributors to provide products and value-added services at the local level to end customers. At the same time, many of our customers have been working to reduce the number of suppliers they utilize by shifting their annual expenditures to larger distributors that are able to deliver a full range of products and services across multiple locations around the world. These customers are focused on reducing the cost of their in-house procurement and logistics operations and, as a result, rely on relationships with distributors to drive reliability, quality, product consistency and purchasing leverage across their organization. We believe that this trend has allowed larger distributors to continue to take market share from smaller, local undercapitalized and under-inventoried competitors that do not offer an enterprise-wide range of products, and has disadvantaged large national players that do not deliver products across multiple continents. We believe that we are well-suited to continue to benefit from this trend through our global distribution platform and believe that this current trend will continue even in the current economic downturn as both manufacturers and customers seek to find new ways to cut costs while maintaining product quality and service levels.

Despite the recent volatility in commodity prices and the global economic slowdown, we continue to believe that the long-term outlook for the end-markets we serve is positive. We believe that the following factors will continue to support spending and, in turn, drive demand for our specialized products:

•

Increasing global demand for crude oil and natural gas over the long term. In its “International Energy Outlook 2008” published in June of 2008, the Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) estimates that world oil and natural gas consumption will increase by 35% and 52%, respectively, between 2005 and 2030. This growth will be driven by the development of some of the world’s most populous countries (notably, Brazil, Russia, India and China). The EIA forecasts that global oil consumption will increase by 29 million barrels per day by 2030, but countries that are not members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (the “OECD”) will represent over 85% of that increase. While the current economic downturn may moderate these forecasts in the near-term, the long-term industrialization of the non-OECD countries is expected to continue. Their growth will drive global energy demand and, thereby, the investment in energy infrastructure. In order to meet the projected need for energy, as of November 2008 the International Energy Agency (“IEA”) estimates over $1 trillion must be invested each year across the entire energy value chain between now and 2030. As a supplier of specialized products to the entire global energy industry, we expect to benefit from these long-term demand trends.

LOGO

•

Conventional producing regions confronting rising depletion rates and geopolitical instability. Many of the historically important oil and gas deposits such as those in Russia, Mexico, Venezuela, the North Sea, parts of the Middle East and conventional fields in the United States are in structural decline. Additionally, existing production in several major producing regions such as the Middle East and West Africa is threatened by political and civil instability. According to estimates by the National Petroleum Council, existing production

capacity declines of 4% to 7% coupled with a modest increase in demand will result in the need to locate and develop crude oil sources equivalent to 70 to 100 million barrels of production per day by 2030. To replace current production, the oil and gas industry has focused its attention on large scale resources that have historically been underexploited for economic or geopolitical reasons. Many of these resources, such as the oil sands of Western Canada, unconventional North American natural gas shales and deepwater offshore formations in West Africa, Brazil, Asia and North America, require significant investments in infrastructure to develop and deliver them to market and we expect this to drive demand for our entire suite of products.

•

Significant capital investment in unconventional oil and natural gas production, particularly in North America. Advances in technology, declining conventional reserves, and continued instability in the Middle East have increased interest in unconventional oil and natural gas deposits including Canada’s vast oil sands and the natural gas shales in the United States. As noted in “Alberta’s Oil Sands, Opportunity Balance,” published by the government of Alberta in September 2008, Alberta’s oil sands contain estimated, non-proven oil reserves of 173 billion barrels and, although oil sands resource development is a complex and capital-intensive process, these reserves are expected to make a significant contribution to future global crude oil production. Alberta is projected to benefit from a multi-billion-dollar investment in infrastructure and technology focused on developing the non-conventional resource, and the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board projects that the industry will spend an average of CAD $11.0 billion per year through 2011. Within the United States, much of the focus has been on developing unconventional natural gas fields and, according to the December 2008 early release of the EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2009, unconventional natural gas resources such as these are expected to meet most of the growth in US domestic consumption and offset declining conventional natural gas resources. Many of these new resources exist in parts of the country that currently lack sufficient pipeline, processing, treating and storage infrastructure. As a result, we expect that investment in the expansion of the natural gas transmission infrastructure will be required within these regions and we expect this to drive demand for our specialty steel pipe, fittings and valves.

•

Continuing investment in oil and natural gas transmission capacity. To meet North American energy demand, continued investment in the expansion and maintenance of natural gas transmission capacity is required. Over the last five years, there has been a marked increase in developing North American sources of oil and natural gas to meet domestic energy demand and to secure sources of energy away from areas of political and civil instability. As new sources are developed, numerous large-scale projects are being undertaken across the continent in order to transport these resources from isolated producing regions to markets that face short supply. According to the EIA’s July 2008 report, “Additions to Capacity on the U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Network: 2007,” at least 50 natural gas pipeline projects were completed in 2007 at a cost of $4.3 billion. This is a significant increase over the $2.3 billion spent on 51 projects in 2006, as indicated in the EIA’s Natural Gas Pipeline New and Expansion Projects Database. These projects added close to 1,663 miles of pipeline, continuing the expansion cycle that started in 2005. Furthermore, according to the EIA’s report, over 4,400 miles of new pipeline were projected to be built in 2008, which is more than 2.5 times the mileage added in 2007. At the same time, the existing pipeline network is aging, necessitating more maintenance and repair operations. We offer customers the high-yield carbon steel pipe, pipe fittings and components and valves for the construction and maintenance of these natural gas gathering and transmission systems.

•

Aging global refining and processing capacity necessitating modernization, infrastructure expansion and newbuild projects. Investment in refining and processing infrastructure has been limited over the past 20 years. The last large new refinery constructed in the United States was completed in 1976 and since then the number of total refineries in the United States has declined from 223 in 1985 to 150 in 2008 according to data collected by the EIA in June of 2008. Furthermore, the vast majority of refiners were originally constructed to process light, sweet crude oil, production of which is declining at a faster rate than overall production. Additionally, most new sources, such as the oil sands in Western Canada, are poised to introduce large quantities of heavy, sour crude oil to the North American market. This heavy, sour crude is more difficult to refine, requires additional processing and is a more corrosive feedstock leading to more stress across a refinery’s infrastructure and an increase in maintenance. Accordingly, we believe refiners will need to upgrade, expand and convert existing capacity to process this changing feedstock. Finally, according to July 2008 estimates by the IEA, global crude distillation capacity is expected to rise by 8.8 million barrels per day between 2008 and 2013 in order to meet long-term increases in demand. We expect that the combination of higher consumption, aging refinery infrastructure and changing inputs has led to higher maintenance and replacement rates, as well as an increase in the number of larger projects including newbuilds, expansions and retrofits, to continue to drive demand for our specialty, high alloy pipes, valves and components.

•

Global investment in power generation capacity. Substantial new electricity generation capacity is required as developing economies experience rapid population growth and industrialization. In addition, many developed economies continue to enact regulations that promote the retirement or refurbishment of older coal and crude oil-based generation capacity. As a result, both OECD and non-OECD countries will require significant investment in new and more efficient power facilities and related infrastructure. In fact, the EIA projects in its “International Energy Outlook 2008” report that global electricity generation will grow from 17.3 trillion kWh in 2005 to 33.3 trillion kWh by 2030, an increase of over 90%. The bulk of this incremental demand, however, is expected to originate in non-OECD countries. We supply seamless carbon and alloy pipe, components and valves that can withstand the effects of the extremely high pressures and temperatures encountered in power generation facilities.

LOGO

•

Rising activity in developing international markets. Many crude oil and natural gas producers have significant operations in international markets with large untapped reserves, such as Southeast Asia, Brazil, West Africa and the Middle East. In many of these markets, a significant investment in production infrastructure is required to develop new crude and natural gas discoveries. According to the January 2009 “Oil and Gas Industry Drilling Activity Outlook - Update” published by Spears & Associates, Inc., international offshore

drilling and completion spending accounts for 70% of worldwide offshore drilling and completion spending and has increased from $20.9 billion in 2000 to $51.8 billion in 2008, representing a compound annual growth rate of 12.0%, and is expected to increase by a compound annual growth rate of 8.2% between 2008 and 2013, reaching $76.7 billion in 2013. We believe our global platform is well positioned to serve this market.

•

Increasing exploration and development activity in deepwater markets. Driven by technological innovations, deepwater oil and natural gas activity has increased significantly in recent years. Exploration, drilling and production in deepwater requires the use of sophisticated assets that are in scarce supply or require long lead times and significant capital to fabricate, including deepwater drilling rigs and floating production facilities. Because deepwater projects tend to have the longest development timetables and have decline rates lower than other formations, short-term commodity price environments correlate much less with development activity than most other oil and gas projects. Also, access to capital is often less of a constraint for deepwater projects as the operators involved are often among the largest and best capitalized in the industry. According to data collected by RigLogix, utilization rates for offshore drilling rigs have exceeded 85% since late 2004, and are currently averaging 85.2% as of February 2009, prompting the industry to invest substantial capital in maintenance, upgrades and new drilling rig construction. The fleet is also aging, with the average semisubmersible and drillship being 24 and 19 years old, respectively. According to World Oil Magazine, this has created a construction backlog in shipyards around the world with 145 offshore drilling rigs currently under construction and 41 on order as of December 2008. This compares to 130 under construction and 45 on order in January 2008. Although the recent turmoil in the financial and commodities markets has caused some energy companies to choose not to exercise options for new rigs, it is expected that the vast majority of new offshore rigs under construction or on order will be completed. Deepwater rigs typically have contracts secured while under construction, and as such, begin earning money once they are completed. We expect the demand for our specialized products to continue to increase as oil and natural gas producers continue to invest in the infrastructure needed to commercially produce these deepwater reserves. We supply carbon conductor pipe that is required to begin the drilling of an offshore well and the high-grade structural pipe, plate, and sections that are required for the construction of drilling rigs, offshore platforms (both fixed and floating) and wellhead connections.

•

Increased focus on safety and stricter regulatory standards. With limited investment in refining, processing, and transmission infrastructure over the last 20 years, owners and operators face increasingly strict government regulations and safety and environmental requirements as they manage aging infrastructure. Ensuring compliance with these regulations requires higher rates of maintenance, repair, and replacement. Following a series of refinery accidents, increased regulations have mandated regular testing and maintenance for refinery facilities. Refinery operations must meet standards designed to prevent personal injury to workers from faulty equipment, and environmental damage from spills and fires. In a 2009 report, the American Petroleum Institute estimates that U.S. refinery operations spent $8.3 billion in 2007 toward maintaining compliance with environmental regulations. This ongoing, mandated expenditure has reduced the length of the equipment replacement cycle for refineries. In 2000, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a new regulatory framework, the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act, which mandated comprehensive testing and replacement programs for transmission lines across the United States. As a result of these new regulations, companies are required to invest in training and new technology to monitor and improve the integrity of their pipelines. We believe that continued maintenance, testing and repair spending and new regulations for piping systems in refineries and pipeline transmission networks will drive demand for a significant portion of our products.

Our competitive strengths

We consider the following to be our principal competitive strengths:

•

Our global distribution model. Our global distribution model enables us to provide our customers with procurement and project management services wherever they need them all around the world. We believe that we distinguish ourselves from our competitors because we have built a global platform and broad product offering that combines local knowledge and presence to meet our customers’ needs for the purchase and delivery

of high-performance specialty steel products. We efficiently procure and deliver a broad range of products, some that otherwise might require large orders with long lead times, to customers who may not have the relationships, resources or logistical support and who may not be purchasing in sufficient volume to independently procure supplies for their projects or MRO needs. In addition, we use our market knowledge, product expertise and vendor relationships to provide our customers with complete logistical support for their projects, including inventory management and just-in-time product delivery on a worldwide basis.

•

We have a knowledgeable and experienced sales force. We believe that our sales and support team has the knowledge and experience to provide valuable advisory support to our customers while meeting their product procurement requirements. In addition, many of our sales personnel have technical backgrounds and training related to our products. Our regional offices are staffed by personnel with knowledge of our customers’ product requirements, local market conditions and codes and regulations. Our sales specialists are skilled both in managing the intricate logistics inherent in complex projects and in anticipating and accommodating the expedited MRO requirements of our customers. This enables our customers to focus on the maintenance of their installed facilities and the engineering, design and construction elements of their projects with the knowledge that the components we provide will be delivered as they are needed.

•

We have strong vendor relationships. We are a volume purchaser of specialty steel products, and we believe that we serve as a critical link between our vendors and our customers. Many of the products we supply are difficult for individual customers to purchase on a cost-effective basis directly from manufacturers since the manufacturers tend to hold limited inventories and often require large orders and lengthy lead times for new production runs. We have demonstrated to our vendors that we are a consistent, high-volume purchaser of their products and a valuable, reliable sales channel. As a result, we believe we have developed strong, long-standing relationships and have negotiated preferred pricing and delivery terms with key vendors. We believe these relationships would be difficult for others to replicate. Although we concentrate our purchasing power on a select group of highly valued vendors, we currently have multiple sources for the products that we distribute and are not dependent on any single manufacturer.

•

Our management team is experienced and incentivized. Each member of our senior management team has more than 20 years of industry experience. In addition, many of our senior managers have experience that is specific to the relevant industries and geographies we serve and in acquiring and integrating new businesses. The compensation of our senior managers is tied to financial performance measures, which we believe aligns their interests with our shareholders. Following the closing of this offering, our senior management will own approximately % of our common shares.

Our business strategy

We intend to continue to grow our business by utilizing the following strategies:

•

Increasing the size of our addressable market and our overall market presence. We will seek to attract new customers in the geographic areas and product markets we serve. We also intend to expand our overall specialty product offering to fit our customers’ planned capital expenditure requirements and meet their ongoing MRO needs. Lastly, we will continue to expand and further penetrate the geographic markets we serve by establishing new sales representative/distribution offices, entering into joint ventures and other similar arrangements, acquiring existing businesses, and increasing our sales force. Through these efforts we will seek to capture a higher portion of our customers’ overall spending on specialty products.

•

Leveraging our investment in people, locations, inventory and systems. We believe our global scale, specialty product offering, robust information systems and trained and experienced personnel combine to help our customers optimize their procurement practices. We will leverage this investment to gain share in existing, developed markets and to achieve greater penetration of emerging high-growth markets (particularly in those where we already have a presence). Our hiring practices, training, business systems, product additions, inventory and location development will be guided by the need to meet our customers’ requirements.

•

and encourages our vendors to give us preferred or sole channel access to their specialty products. We believe our customers and vendors appreciate this important and deep relationship we have in providing timely purchasing and availability of product to the markets we serve.

•

Geographical markets

Our global operations are managed through two geographic markets — the Western Hemisphere and the Eastern Hemisphere. Our Western Hemisphere market comprises one of our reportable segments, which was formerly referred to as the Americas reportable segment. The Eastern Hemisphere market is segregated further to derive our reportable segments for that geographic market, which include the UK (Europe/West Africa), Singapore (Asia/Pacific) and UAE (Middle East). We believe that these segments enable us to effectively serve our customers worldwide.

Western Hemisphere. Our Western Hemisphere operations are headquartered in Houston, Texas and operate through a regional and branch network in the United States and Canada. Sixteen of our Western Hemisphere locations stock inventory for distribution. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, sales in our Western Hemisphere market comprised 66% of our total revenue for the period.

Eastern Hemisphere. Our Eastern Hemisphere operations are headquartered in Newbridge, Scotland and operate through a regional and branch network of locations in Europe, Asia/Pacific and the Middle East. In addition, our Bahraini joint venture operates in Saudi Arabia through a service contract arrangement. Five of our locations in the Eastern Hemisphere stock inventory. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, sales in our Eastern Hemisphere market comprised 34% of our total revenue for the period.

See note 16 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for additional information regarding our sales and assets by geographical area.

Revenue sources

We do not manufacture any products. We are a distributor/reseller of our vendors’ manufactured products. Through our operating subsidiaries, we purchase specialty steel products from a number of vendors worldwide, but primarily from vendors located in Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea and the United States. Our operating subsidiaries in the Western Hemisphere are primarily responsible for sales and fulfillment efforts for customers in the Western Hemisphere and our operating subsidiaries in the Eastern Hemisphere are primarily responsible for sales and fulfillment efforts for customers in the Eastern Hemisphere.

In anticipation of the aggregate future needs of our customers, we purchase specialty steel products in larger quantities that are efficient for our vendors to produce. We also purchase these products in smaller quantities in response to specific requests from our customers. In making purchasing decisions, we use general economic indicators, inquiries, orders and continuous interaction with our customers to help us determine customer usage patterns, expected delivery dates and the nature of active projects in the market. Our company-wide management information system assists us in evaluating historical usage, the inventory at each of our locations, and other purchasing data.

Our vendors generally use third-party freight carriers to ship these products to our customers at our direction or to us. When we ship products to our customers from inventory on hand, we also predominantly use third-party freight carriers.

We generate substantially all of our revenues from the sale of our products to third parties. Through third party service providers, we also offer a wide range of cutting and finishing services for our products. Our fees for these services are incorporated into our sales price. Freight costs are generally included in our sales price as well.

Products

We distribute specialty steel and alloy products for use primarily in specialized applications throughout the energy infrastructure markets. The products we sell are generally highly-engineered prime carbon or alloy steel pipe, pipe components, fittings and flanges, high-grade structural sections and plate and valves. These products are designed to withstand the effects of corrosive or abrasive materials and possess performance characteristics required in extreme operating conditions, including high pressure and extreme temperature environments. Our products are used in refining, petrochemical, offshore production, platform construction, power generation, mechanical construction, mining and certain other specific oil and natural gas applications. They are used for maintenance and repair projects, expansions of infrastructure and development projects. We maintain a broad inventory of more than 14,000 specialty products including a large selection of valves, components and more than 100,000 tons of pipes, plate and sections.

Primary products

Carbon and Alloy Steel Pipe. We offer a full range of seamless and welded carbon and alloy pipe used for high pressure, severe corrosion and temperature resistance applications for oil and natural gas gathering and transmission, refining, petrochemical, phosphate mining and power applications. Structural applications of our pipe offering include offshore jackets, topsides, jack up drilling rig braces and onshore production facilities. Down-hole applications include marine riser and conductor, booster line and annulus pipe.

Pipe Components, Fittings, and Flanges. We offer a complete line of carbon and alloy components, fittings and flanges used primarily to connect piping systems for high pressure, severe corrosion and temperature resistance applications for oil and natural gas gathering and transmission, refining, petrochemical, phosphate mining and power applications.

Structural Sections and Plate. Products offered include universal beams, columns, channels, flats, angles, hollow sections and specialty rolled quenched and tempered plates in engineered lengths, widths and thicknesses. The primary market served is conventional and severe service offshore and deep water drilling and production facilities. Principal end uses include offshore jackets, topsides, jack up drilling rigs and onshore production assemblies.

Valves. Our full line of ball, check, gate, globe, butterfly, needle, and plug valves are used to connect to piping systems regulating flow and pressure of various gases and fluids. End markets served include production, gathering, transmission, refining and certain industrial applications. When required, we offer full actuation packages.

Customers

We market products to more than 2,750 customers, who are involved throughout the complete scope of the energy industry and are located around the world. Our customers are generally large, well capitalized companies who are recognized as leaders in their respective industries. Our customers include engineering and construction firms, equipment fabricators, multi-national and national major integrated oil and natural gas companies, independent oil and natural gas companies, natural gas transmission and distribution companies, petrochemical companies, mining companies, oil sands developers, power generation companies and utilities, alternative energy providers and certain integrated MRO distribution companies. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our top ten customers accounted for approximately 23% of our total sales.

Customer support

Complete procurement and project management services. We believe that our customers require us to supply a full range of products to meet the needs of their complex applications. Accordingly, we are able to provide complete procurement services that we believe to be of significant value to our customers, particularly where the range of products required is beyond the scope of one or more distributors or manufacturers. We further believe that our customers appreciate the convenience of being able to place a single purchase order covering a full range of specialty products required for a project, rather than having to manage numerous providers.

We believe that we meet our customers’ requirements through the integration of our significant levels of stock with access to direct mill supply sources. Given our significant levels of stock, we can often fulfill many of our customers’ requirements immediately and expedite delivery. Our mill relationships allow us to efficiently source and deliver the

products we do not have on hand. We believe that this full service approach maximizes material availability while retaining optimum project cost controls. We also offer a wide range of cutting and finishing services primarily through third parties.

Maintenance and repair operations. Our business model allows us to meet the ongoing MRO needs of our clients’ installed facilities. Our large inventory of specialized steel products in strategic global locations can provide the immediate delivery of solutions that fit our customers’ requirements, which are often time-sensitive. We also maintain the ability to access inventories globally, allowing our offices to ship from any of our locations.

Logistics. Our customers’ requirements for delivery to various fabrication destinations and ultimate end-use locations are often complex and time-sensitive. We provide extensive project management support, coordinated shipping expertise and if required, rapid just-in-time delivery of maintenance and repair components. Our regional and branch networks allow us to respond to our customers’ global logistical needs with local contacts and assistance and to fulfill both project and quick ship requirements.

Sales and marketing

Our sales force operates under a regional branch model. The regional managers employ a mix of branch managers and inside and outside sales representatives in their respective territories. The sales representatives are located at various branch locations and are responsible for order solicitation, account and relationship management and market development. The regional managers have responsibility for pricing, order placement and fulfillment, logistics, customer service, business development and marketing strategies. Regional managers report to geographic market executives who have responsibility for the management, implementation and execution of our sales and marketing strategy.

Geographical executives and their regional managers are assisted by warehousing and logistics personnel and by a product and inventory management team that is responsible for procurement, pricing, product forecasting, inventory control and vendor development.

Vendors

We have mutually beneficial, longstanding relationships with an established network of vendors. This network of vendor relationships enables us to stock and distribute a considerable breadth of products. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 46% of our purchases were from our top ten vendors. Focusing our purchasing power on certain vendors’ specialty product niches has resulted in favored status with our vendors in regard to lead times, discounts and payment terms. As we continue to strengthen our vendor relationships, we are able to devote increased resources to providing our customers with products that are of greater importance to their business and have fewer substitutes. Although we concentrate our purchasing power on a select group of highly valued vendors, we have multiple sources for the products we distribute and are not dependent on any single vendor.

We are a volume purchaser of high-specialty steel products and provide significant value-added support as an intermediary between high-grade steel manufacturing vendors and end-users. There are a limited number of vendors with the capabilities to produce these steel products, and we believe that we have demonstrated to our vendors over time that we are a high quality, reliable and high-volume purchaser of their products. In addition, our significant participation in large long-term projects enables us to plan our purchases and provides our vendors with critical visibility to schedule their production. As a result, we have developed strong, longstanding relationships with an established network of steel manufacturing vendors that we believe would be difficult for others to replicate.

Intellectual property

We have applied to register the EDGEN MURRAY™ mark in the United States and critical markets in Europe, Asia, Australia and the Middle East, and are in the process of applying for registration of the mark in Canada, Mexico and South America. We claim common law rights in the EDGEN MURRAY™ mark in those jurisdictions that recognize trademark rights based on use without registration. We also claim common law trademark rights to a number of other names and marks important to our business, including Edgen™, Bartow Steel™, Resource Pipe Co.™, SISCO™, Thomas Pipe™, Pro Metals™ and Radnor Alloys™, although we have not applied for federal or international registration for them.

We recognize the importance to our business of the various intellectual property rights, including trademarks, that we use. While we acknowledge that the statutory rights arising from a successful trademark registration generally gives greater certainty as to the ownership of the registered mark as well as making enforcement of the owner’s rights against third parties easier than if it had to rely on the enforcement of its unregistered rights in the mark, we nevertheless believe that adequate protection of the goodwill in the marks used by our business is afforded through the various unregistered rights that are acquired simply by use over a period of time in a number of the jurisdictions in which we operate. Where intellectual property rights used by our business are not owned by us, we have entered into licensing arrangements with the relevant owner.

Employees

As of September 30, 2008, our workforce consisted of 521 full-time employees, of whom 168 are sales personnel. We employ 367 people in the Western Hemisphere and 154 employees in the Eastern Hemisphere. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.

Competition

Our products are sold in highly competitive markets. Companies in the markets in which we operate compete primarily on customer service, access to materials, price and ability to deliver products in a timely manner. Purchase decisions are also influenced by previous experience with a particular distributor and a distributor’s ability to supply the full range of pipes, pipe components, tubes, plate, valves and sections.

In our Western Hemisphere market, our primary competition comes from numerous smaller, privately-owned regional distributors and in some cases, subsidiaries of large publicly-held companies. Our major competitors in our UK (Europe/ West Africa) segment are generally trading companies that are owned by large international steel producers. Although these competitors may have significantly greater resources than us, they do not maintain stocks of readily available products that compete with the range of products we offer. In our UAE (Middle East) segment, our principal competitors are locally owned distributors, except in the case of our specialty plate products where we again compete with trading companies owned by various steel makers. Finally, our Singapore (Asia/Pacific) segment competes across our product lines with trading companies owned by various steel makers and, to a lesser extent, with local Singapore based distributors.

We believe that none of our competitors offer the depth and breadth of specialty steel products in stock that we offer in any particular market. Although we have competitors with respect to many of the specific products we offer in specific markets, who may be larger and have greater resources than we do, we believe that no competitor or small group of competitors is dominant in any of our markets. While we must be price competitive in all of our markets, we believe that our customers select our products based on local leadership, the product knowledge of our staff, and our broad product offering of specialty products.

Worldwide Presence

We currently own or lease facilities in eight countries: Australia, Canada, China, Indonesia, Singapore, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom and United States. We have sales offices in each of these countries. Twenty of our facilities stock inventory, including 14 in the United States, two in the United Kingdom, two in Canada, one in the United Arab Emirates and one in Singapore. We also have a stocking facility at one of our customer’s sites in Baku, Azerbaijan.

We use agents in Abu Dhabi, Brunei, China, India, Indonesia, New Zealand, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and Vietnam, whose properties are neither owned nor leased by us. We have a branch office in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates which has no permanent physical presence. We lease residential premises as staff accommodations in the United Arab Emirates. We also have a joint venture in Saudi Arabia that has no physical presence.

The following table provides a summary of our facilities:

Summary of leased and owned facilities


Location	Building (sq. ft.)	Lease/ Own	Lease Expiration	Facility description
*Company Headquarters*
Baton Rouge, Louisiana	17,410	Lease	2013	Office

*Western Hemisphere*
Houston, Texas	15,788	Lease	2014	Office
Baton Rouge, Louisiana	7,560	Lease	2010	Office/Warehouse
Broussard, Louisiana	4,500	Lease	2010	Office/Warehouse
Charlotte, North Carolina	12,550	Lease	2011	Office/Warehouse/Yard
Calgary, Alberta	425	Lease	2012	Office
Edmonton, Alberta	16,078	Lease	2010	Office/Warehouse
Edmonton, Alberta	NA	Lease	2014	Yard
Henderson, Colorado	2,500	Lease	2010	Office/Warehouse/Yard
Houston, Texas	51,000	Lease	2014	Office/Warehouse/Yard
Houston, Texas (1)	17,750	Lease	2012	Office/Warehouse/Yard
Houston, Texas	22,191	Lease	2012	Office/Warehouse
Houston, Texas	NA	Lease	2014	Yard
Anaheim, California	13,200	Lease	2013	Office/Warehouse
Mulberry, Florida	46,816	Own	NA	Office/Warehouse/Yard
Mulberry, Florida	NA	Lease	2010	Yard
Odessa, Texas	5,000	Lease	2012	Office/Warehouse/Yard
Port Allen, Louisiana	9,500	Own	NA	Office/Warehouse/Yard
St. Charles, Illinois	22,000	Lease	2011	Office/Warehouse
St. Louis, Missouri	2,800	Lease	2012	Office/Yard
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania	4,175	Lease	2012	Office

*Eastern Hemisphere*
Newbridge, Scotland	210,000	Lease	2030	Office/Warehouse/Yard
Darlington, England	2,000	Own	NA	Office
Kirknewton, Scotland	NA	Own	NA	Yard
Jakarta, Indonesia	1,250	Lease	2009	Office
Perth, Australia	1,287	Lease	2010	Office
Shanghai, China	1,152	Lease	2009	Office
Tuas, Singapore	71,687	Lease	2056	Office/Warehouse
Jebel Ali, Dubai, UAE	2,660	Lease	2009	Office/Yard

(1)	No operations at this time, as location is currently being subleased to a third party.

We operate facilities that enable us to provide highly efficient and timely services to our customers. In 2007, we invested more than $5.0 million in these facilities. This modernization results in increased operating efficiency, which we believe gives us a cost advantage over many of our competitors.

Our facilities are equipped to handle several modes of transportation including truck, rail and barge, and many facilities are in close proximity to deep water ports such as Houston, Texas; Tuas, Singapore; Jebel Ali, Dubai; New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Tampa, Florida; Los Angeles, California; and Grangemouth and Leith, Scotland. Shipping by rail or barge significantly lowers freight costs. Nearly all of our facilities have processing capabilities such as saw cut to length and oxy-fuel and plasma cutting, thereby enabling us to perform value-added service at the point of sale in most cases. Pick and ship capabilities are employed at our larger distribution centers.

All of our locations are certified to ISO 9001-2000 (Quality Management) and a number of our locations are additionally certified to ISO 14001-2004 (Environmental Management) and/or ISO AS/NZS 4801:2001 or OHSAS 18001:1999 (Safety Management) and the Achilles Joint Qualification System for suppliers to the oil industry in Norway and Denmark.

Information technology

We have an advanced information technology (IT) platform to help us manage our business. As a distributor, our primary operational focus is order management and our systems are designed to streamline the logistics involved with obtaining products from our vendors, tracking those products within our sizable inventory and delivering those products to our customers. This system uses bar coded tags and wireless handheld scanners to track the inventory in our major distribution facilities and allows our salespeople to quickly ascertain what products are available and where those products are located. The system allows for efficient pick and ship execution and is accessible from all of our locations worldwide.

In our Western Hemisphere market, business functions including order management, procurement, inventory control, accounting and finance operate on a unified Oracle platform. The 2007 acquisitions of PetroSteel and EVS have been fully integrated into this system. In our Eastern Hemisphere market, we operate under a separate ERP and financial system. Financial consolidation packages are being implemented to streamline the consolidation process between the two financial systems used in our Eastern and Western Hemisphere market. We have also begun the process of integrating both hemispheres into a single global platform using the Oracle EBS platform and expect to complete integration by year end 2009.

The combined system is fully protected against service disruptions. All production servers utilize highly-available components, minimizing single points of failure. The primary data center in Baton Rouge is further protected with redundant cooling, battery backup, generator power and carded access. Finally, a full disaster recovery site is leased in Dallas, Texas in the event the Baton Rouge systems are disrupted for an extended period of time.

Legal proceedings

We are from time to time a party to various claims and legal proceedings related to our business. There are no current material claims or legal proceedings pending against us that, in the opinion of our management, individually or in the aggregate, if determined adversely to us, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Environmental matters

Our operations are subject to various laws and regulations relating to environmental concerns. As with other companies engaged in like businesses, the nature of our operations exposes us to the risk of liabilities or claims with respect to environmental matters, including those relating to the disposal and release of hazardous substances. Primary US environmental laws that our operations may be subject to include the federal Clean Water Act and comparable state laws, and regulations thereunder, which regulate the discharge of pollutants into regulated waters, including industrial wastewater discharges and storm water runoff; the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and comparable state laws, and regulations thereunder, which regulate the management and disposal of solid and hazardous waste; and the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and regulations thereunder, which imposes liability for the cleanup of hazardous substances that may have been released at properties currently or previously owned or operated by us or locations to which we have sent waste for disposal. Our operations are also governed by laws and regulations relating to workplace safety and worker health which, among other things, regulate employee exposure to hazardous chemicals in the workplace. In addition, our operations are subject to similar non-US environmental and worker health laws. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations or newly adopted laws or regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including the assessment of monetary penalties, the imposition of remedial requirements, and the issuance of orders enjoining future operations or imposing additional compliance requirements on such operations. Certain environmental laws, including CERCLA and analogous state laws and regulations, impose strict,

joint and several liability for costs required to clean up and restore sites where hazardous substances have been disposed or otherwise released. Moreover, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances, hydrocarbons, or other waste products into the environment. Management believes that our operations are in substantial compliance with environmental laws and regulations applicable to us.

We have not made any material expenditures during the last three fiscal years in order to comply with environmental laws or regulations. Based on our experience to date, we believe that the future cost of compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, we cannot predict what environmental or health and safety legislation or regulations will be enacted in the future or how existing or future laws or regulations will be enforced, administered or interpreted, nor can we predict the amount of future expenditures that may be required in order to comply with such environmental or health and safety laws or regulations or to respond to such environmental claims.

Seasonality

Some of our customers are in seasonal businesses, especially those customers who purchase our products for use in new capital expenditure projects at refineries, oil and natural gas infrastructure, and processing and power generation plants. As a consequence, our results of operations and working capital, including our accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable, may fluctuate during the year. However, because of our geographic, product and customer diversity, our operations have not shown any material seasonal trends. We believe that our significant operations around the world moderate our seasonality. In addition, our sales for MRO tend not to be seasonal, and mitigate the overall effects of seasonality on our business. Sales in the months of November and December traditionally have been lower than in other months because of a reduced number of working days for shipments of our products and holiday closures for some of our customers. We cannot assure you that period-to-period fluctuations will not occur in the future. Results of any one or more quarters are, therefore, not necessarily indicative of annual results.

Working capital practices

Volatility in the specialty pipe, pipe components, and high-grade structural steel industry and the price of high-grade steel tubes, valves, plate and sections used in the offshore oil and natural gas industry, from time to time, can result in significant fluctuations in cash flow supporting our working capital levels. Inventory and accounts receivable comprise a large percentage of our total assets and can vary significantly from quarter to quarter. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, inventory and accounts receivable represented approximately 65.6% and 61.4%, respectively, of total assets excluding cash. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations — Liquidity and capital resources.”

Our history and formation

Through our predecessor companies, we have been in the business of distributing specialty steel products for more than 30 years.

The Buy-out Transaction. On February 1, 2005, a corporation formed by Fund III and certain members of our management acquired the business of one of our predecessors, Edgen Corporation.

Acquisition of Western Flow Products, Inc. In July 2005, we significantly expanded our presence in Canada through the acquisition of Western Flow Products, Inc., a specialty steel distributor in Alberta.

Formation of Edgen/Murray, L.P. and the MIM Acquisition. On December 16, 2005, we acquired Murray International Metals Limited, a UK-based leading global distributor of high-grade steel products primarily to the offshore oil and natural gas industry. To effect this acquisition, we formed a new parent holding company, Edgen/Murray L.P. The acquisition of Murray International Metals Limited gave us an enhanced global presence and eventually led us to change our name to Edgen Murray.

Recapitalization Transaction and the acquisition of PetroSteel. On May 11, 2007, Edgen Murray II, L.P., a newly formed holding company, acquired our business in a transaction led by Fund IV. Although the funds that comprise

Fund IV are also managed by JCP, they are not the same as the funds that comprise Fund III that led the Buy-out Transaction. We also acquired PetroSteel on May 11, 2007, which allowed us to fill out the uppermost ranges of our steel plate product line.

Acquisition of EVS. In August 2007, we acquired EVS to further expand our product line into the specialty valve business.

Formation of Edgen Murray Limited and the Contribution. Edgen Murray Limited was incorporated in August 2008 as an exempted company under Bermuda law to serve as a future holding company for our non-North American subsidiaries. Prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, Edgen Murray Limited will also become the holding company for our North American subsidiaries as a result of the Contribution and, as our new parent holding company, will serve as the issuer in this offering.

See “Certain relationships and related person transactions.”

Management

Directors and senior management

The following table sets forth the names, ages and titles, as well as a brief account of the business experience, as of the date of this prospectus, of the members of our board of directors and our senior management:


Name	Age	Position
Daniel J. O’Leary	53	Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
David L. Laxton, III	58	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Craig S. Kiefer	54	Executive Vice President — General Manager, Western Hemisphere
Kenneth A. Cockburn	56	Executive Vice President — Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere
Michael F.A. Craig	42	Deputy Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere and Managing Director, Asia/Pacific — Eastern Hemisphere
Nicholas Daraviras	35	Director
James L. Luikart	63	Director
Edward J. DiPaolo	56	Director

Daniel J. O’Leary, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, has been involved in the steel pipe and distribution industries for more than 30 years. Mr. O’Leary was appointed as Edgen Murray Limited’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer in September 2008. Since August 2003, he has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of our predecessor companies and as a member of the boards of directors of those predecessor companies since February 2003. He joined Edgen Corporation as President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2003. Prior to joining Edgen Corporation, Mr. O’Leary served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Stupp Corporation, an independent manufacturer of electric-resistance welded custom steel line pipe, from 1995 to 2002. Prior to joining Stupp Corporation, he was Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer of Maverick Tube Corporation, a pipe manufacturing company. He has also held management and executive positions with Red Man Pipe & Supply Company and Lone Star Steel Company. Mr. O’Leary is a former Vice-Chairman of the Committee on Pipe and Tube Imports and a member of the National Association of Steel Pipe Distributors. Mr. O’Leary is a graduate of the University of Tulsa with a B.S. in Education.

David L. Laxton, III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has more than 20 years of experience in industrial distribution. Mr. Laxton was appointed as Edgen Murray Limited’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in September 2008. Prior to these appointments, Mr. Laxton served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of our predecessor companies since joining the company in 1996. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Laxton served as Chief Financial Officer of a distributor of tube fittings, controls and filtration products from January 1991 to December 1996. Mr. Laxton has also held consulting positions with a big four accounting firm and with an investment banking firm. Mr. Laxton is currently Vice Chairman of American Gateway Bank and is the former president of the Baton Rouge Chapter of the National Association of Purchasing Management. Mr. Laxton is a member of the Advisory Committee to the School of Accounting at Louisiana State University. Mr. Laxton received a B.A. in History and an M.S. in Accounting from Louisiana State University.

Craig S. Kiefer, Executive Vice President — General Manager, Western Hemisphere, has more than 30 years of experience in the industrial distribution market and manages our Western Hemisphere business. Mr. Kiefer joined Edgen Corporation in April 2002 as the President of Service Industrial Supply Co. He was promoted to President of Edgen Corporation’s Carbon Products Group in March 2003 and became Executive Vice President — General

Manager, Western Hemisphere in January 2008. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Kiefer was President and Chief Executive Officer of Service Industrial Supply Co., which he formed in 1979 and which was acquired by Edgen Corporation in 2002.

Kenneth A. Cockburn, Executive Vice President — Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere, has been involved in the steel pipe and distribution industries for nearly 30 years and manages our Eastern Hemisphere business. Mr. Cockburn was appointed as Edgen Murray Limited’s Executive Vice President — Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere in September 2008. Mr. Cockburn joined Murray International Metals Limited in 1977 and was appointed to that company’s board of directors in 1986. Mr. Cockburn was promoted to Managing Director of Murray International Metals Limited in 1991 and became Executive Vice President — Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere in January 2008.

Michael F.A. Craig — Deputy Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere and Managing Director, Asia/Pacific — Eastern Hemisphere, has been involved in the steel manufacturing, pipe and distribution industries for more than 20 years and manages our Asia/Pacific region within our Eastern Hemisphere market which includes our regional head office in Singapore along with our Australian, Chinese, and Indonesian sales offices. Mr. Craig was appointed as Edgen Murray Limited’s Deputy Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere and Managing Director, Asia/Pacific —Eastern Hemisphere in September 2008. Mr. Craig joined Murray International Metals Limited in November 1989 from British Steel plc. Mr. Craig was promoted to Managing Director of Murray International Metals Pte. Limited in 2002 and became Managing Director, Asia/Pacific — Eastern Hemisphere in 2006 and Deputy Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere in 2008. Mr. Craig received his Honours Degree in Engineering from The University of Stratchclyde (Glasgow, United Kingdom) in 1987.

Nicholas Daraviras, Director, was appointed to Edgen Murray Limited’s board of directors in September 2008 and has previously served on the board of directors of our predecessor companies since February 2005. Mr. Daraviras is a Managing Director of JCP. He joined JCP in 1996. Mr. Daraviras also serves as a director of The Sheridan Group, Inc. Mr. Daraviras received his B.S. and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

James L. Luikart, Director, was appointed to Edgen Murray Limited’s board of directors in September 2008 and had previously served on the board of directors of our predecessor companies since February 2005. Mr. Luikart is Executive Vice President and one of the managing members of JCP. Mr. Luikart joined JCP in 1995 after spending more than 20 years with Citicorp, the last seven years of which were as Vice President of Citicorp Venture Capital, Limited. Mr. Luikart also serves as a director of The Sheridan Group, Inc. Mr. Luikart received a B.A. in History, magna cum laude from Yale University and an M.I.A. from Columbia University.

Edward J. DiPaolo, Director, was appointed to Edgen Murray Limited’s board of directors in September 2008 and had previously served on the board of directors of Edgen Corporation from June 2001 until December 2004 and has served on the board of directors of our predecessor companies after the Buy-out Transaction since August 2005. Mr. DiPaolo has more than 25 years of experience in energy services through his employment with Halliburton Energy Services where he held several positions including Group Senior Vice President of Global Business Development and Senior Vice President of Global Business Development. In 2002, Mr. DiPaolo retired from Halliburton Energy Services. Since August of 2003, Mr. DiPaolo has provided consulting services to Growth Capital Partners, L.P., a company engaged in investments and merchant banking. Mr. DiPaolo currently serves as a director of Superior Well Services, Inc., Evolution Petroleum Corporation and Boots & Coots International Well Control, Inc. Mr. DiPaolo received a B.S. in Agricultural Engineering from West Virginia University.

Composition of our board of directors

Since the formation of Edgen Murray Limited in August 2008, the board of directors has taken action solely by written consent and has not held any meetings. Our directors are elected at annual general meetings of our shareholders and serve until their successors are elected or appointed, unless their office is earlier vacated. Our bye-laws provide that our board of directors will consist of seven directors or such greater or lesser number as our board of directors, by resolution, may from time to time determine, provided that, at all times there shall be no fewer than three directors. Upon consummation of this offering, our board will be divided into three classes, as described below, with each director serving a three-year term and one class being elected at each year’s annual general meeting. Messrs. Daraviras and Luikart will serve initially as Class I directors, (with a term expiring in ). Messrs.

and will serve initially as Class II directors (with a term expiring in ). Messrs. and will serve initially as Class III directors (with a term expiring in ).

No later than twelve months after we list our common stock on the NYSE, a majority of our directors will be required to meet NYSE independence standards. In 2008, our board of directors undertook a review of the independence of our directors and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his responsibilities. We believe that Mr. DiPaolo meets these independence standards. We intend to appoint three additional independent directors within twelve months following this offering.

Pursuant to our bye-laws and an investor rights agreement we intend to enter into prior to the closing of this offering, as long as JCP or funds managed by JCP beneficially own at least 5% of our then-outstanding common shares, JCP will be entitled to certain observer rights. See “Certain relationships and related party transactions — Investors and registration rights agreement.”

Committees of the board of directors

Currently, we do not have a standing audit committee, compensation committee or corporate governance and nominating committee. We anticipate that, prior to the closing of this offering, our board of directors will establish an audit committee, a compensation committee and a corporate governance and nominating committee. No later than twelve months following this offering, all of the members of these committees will be required to meet SEC and NYSE independence requirements.

Audit committee

Our audit committee will be responsible for overseeing our financial reporting processes on behalf of our board of directors. Our independent registered public accounting firm will report directly to our audit committee. Specific responsibilities of our audit committee will include, among other things:

•

evaluating the performance, and assessing the qualifications, of our independent registered public accounting firm and recommending to our board of directors the appointment of, and compensation for, our independent registered public accounting firm for the purpose of preparing or issuing a registered public accounting firm report or performing other audit, review or attest services;

•

subject to the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm by our shareholders, determining and approving the engagement of, and compensation to be paid to, our independent registered public accounting firm;

•

determining and approving the engagement, prior to the commencement of such engagement, of, and compensation for, our independent registered public accounting firm to perform any proposed permissible non-audit services;

•

reviewing our financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and recommending to our board of directors whether or not such financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be approved by our board of directors;

•

conferring with our independent registered public accounting firm and with our management regarding the scope, adequacy and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in effect;

•

establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential and anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

•

reviewing and discussing with our management and independent registered public accounting firm, as appropriate, our guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including our major financial risk exposures and investment and hedging policies and the steps taken by our management to monitor and control these exposures; and

•

reviewing our compliance with environmental, health and safety and other laws and regulations that may have an impact on our financial results.

Compensation committee

Specific responsibilities of our compensation committee will include, among other things:

•

reviewing and making recommendations to our board of directors with respect to our senior management in relation to their:

•

annual base salary;

•

annual incentive bonus, including the specific goals and amount;

•

equity compensation;

•

employment agreements, severance arrangements and change in control agreements/provisions; and

•

other benefits, compensations, compensation policies or arrangements;

•

reviewing and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding general compensation goals and guidelines for employees and the criteria by which bonuses to employees are determined;

•

overseeing management succession planning;

•

preparing any report on compensation to be included in our periodic filings or proxy statement; and

•

acting as administrator of our amended equity incentive plan and determining its use, from time to time, as a form of incentive compensation for those entitled to receive grants of stock options and other benefits under that plan.

Corporate governance and nominating committee

Specific responsibilities of our corporate governance and nominating committee will include, among other things:

•

reviewing board structure, composition and practices, and making recommendations on these matters to our board of directors;

•

reviewing, soliciting and making recommendations to our board of directors and shareholders with respect to candidates for election to the board;

•

reviewing the compensation payable to board and committee members and providing recommendations to our board of directors in regard thereto; and

•

developing and reviewing a set of corporate governance principles for our company.

We anticipate that the corporate governance and nominating committee will adopt a policy of considering director nominees recommended by shareholders who timely submit such recommendations and other required information in accordance with requirements set forth in our bye-laws.

Executive compensation

Compensation discussion and analysis

Introduction

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides an overview of our executive compensation program and a description of the material factors underlying the decisions which resulted in the 2007 compensation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the other three executive officers who were the highest paid during 2007 (collectively, the “named executive officers”) as presented on the tables which follow this CD&A. This CD&A contains statements regarding our performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of our compensation program and should not be understood to be statements of management’s expectations or estimates of financial results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.

Compensation philosophy and objectives

Our compensation program for named executive officers is designed to attract, motivate and retain individuals with the skills necessary for us to achieve our business plan and increase shareholder value, to provide and reward those individuals whose contributions enhance the Company’s results and to align named executive officer remuneration

with the interests of the shareholders. Our compensation philosophy includes (i) setting base salaries at levels consistent with those of comparable companies to attract and retain named executive officers and (ii) aligning the performance-based compensation at levels designed to promote executive contribution to shareholder value. It is also designed to encourage our named executive officers to focus on both the short-term and long-term performance goals of the Company and its shareholders through an annual performance-based cash bonus that focuses on short-term and long-term performance goals and equity-based incentive compensation that focuses on long-term performance goals.

Compensation process

Historically, as a private company, we have not had a formal compensation committee. Rather, Messrs. Daraviras, Luikart and DiPaolo (for purposes of this section, the “Committee”) have overseen the design and implementation of the Company’s compensation program for named executive officers and were charged with setting total compensation for all named executive officers including base salaries, incentive compensation and benefits at levels designed to meet the objectives of our executive compensation program. Although there was no formal meeting procedure, during 2007, the Committee had numerous informal calls, discussions and meetings in order to perform its duties and responsibilities.

The members of the Committee have significant experience with evaluating and setting compensation arrangements for executives. Accordingly, the Committee historically has not utilized a formal benchmarking process or the services of a compensation consultant to set the compensation levels of the named executive officers.

In light of this offering, the Committee has engaged Longnecker & Associates, an executive compensation consulting firm, to review our compensation program for named executive officers. After completion of this offering, we anticipate that the new compensation committee will review the results of the compensation report and determine what action, if any, will be taken in light of the results of the report and the recommendations contained therein.

Prior to the closing of this offering, we anticipate that our board of directors will formally establish a compensation committee to consist of at least three directors and will adopt a formal charter for our compensation committee. The composition of the compensation committee will satisfy the independence requirements of the NYSE that it have at least one independent director on the listing date, a majority of independent directors within 90 days after that date and full compliance within one year after that date. See “Management — Committees of the board of directors — Compensation committee.”

Role of Chief Executive Officer in compensation decisions

Our Chief Executive Officer recommends levels of compensation for the other named executive officers. However, the Committee makes the final determination regarding the compensation of all named executive officers. Compensation for the Chief Executive Officer is determined by the Committee and generally reassessed on an annual basis.

Elements of compensation

Our executive compensation program is comprised of the following elements, each of which is discussed in more depth in the paragraphs that follow:

•

Base Salary;

•

Annual Performance-Based Cash Bonuses;

•

Equity-Based Incentive Compensation;

•

Perquisites; and

•

General Employee Benefits.

We have entered into employment contracts with each of our named executive officers. In addition to the compensation components listed above, these contracts generally provide for post-employment severance payments and other benefits in the event of employment termination under various circumstances.

Base salary. Base salaries are provided to our named executive officers to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Base salaries of our named executive officers are established upon hire, based on the executive’s compensation history, prior compensation levels for the position, available market data and our hiring needs. Base salaries are reviewed on an annual basis and increases, if any, are determined based on a combination of factors, including the executive’s experience level, job responsibility, salary levels for other executives, and the individual’s efforts in achieving business results.

Salaries for 2008 have been established for our named executive officers at $446,250 for Mr. O’Leary, $325,000 for Mr. Laxton, $285,000 for Mr. Kiefer, £326,692 ($645,298) for Mr. Cockburn and £120,000 ($237,030) for Mr. Craig. The increases in salaries for the named executive officers from 2007 to 2008 were based on actual 2007 operating results which included the integration of acquisitions, expansion of product offerings and overall sales growth, as well as our 2008 budget initiatives.

Annual performance-based cash bonus. The Company maintains an Annual Performance-Based Cash Bonus Plan (the “Cash Bonus Plan”) for eligible employees, including named executive officers, in order to motivate such employees to achieve designated annual financial targets. We believe the Cash Bonus Plan is an essential component of the Company’s executive compensation policy because it assists the Company in attracting, motivating, and retaining qualified executives by providing additional earning opportunities based on the named executive’s contributions to the Company’s financial success through the achievement of targeted EBITDA and working capital thresholds.

On an annual basis, the Company’s CEO and CFO make recommendations to the Committee on the targeted EBITDA and working capital thresholds based on current market conditions and potential strategic initiatives, taking into account how the annual EBITDA target will contribute to the Company’s long-term performance goals. Dependent upon the named executive officer’s scope of authority, the EBITDA target and working capital thresholds may be set at a Company, division or other business unit level. The Committee has final approval of the EBITDA target and working capital threshold. In addition, the Committee has discretion to adjust awards or the computation of the EBITDA target and working capital thresholds based on factors outside of the control of individual participants if considered appropriate by the Committee.

The annual EBITDA target performance level was determined by a budgeting process that involved the evaluation of current and anticipated market trends related to customers and vendors, and an evaluation of general company expenses in support of business objectives for that performance year. We believe that our EBITDA targets are moderately difficult to achieve. The Committee attempts to set our EBITDA targets so that the relative difficulty of achieving the targets is consistent among the named executive officers in any one year and from year to year. In the past three years, each named executive officer has achieved a performance level that entitled him to some portion or all of his target bonus award.

For 2007, the terms of the Cash Bonus Plan applicable to Messrs. O’Leary, Laxton and Kiefer (the “US named executive officers”) were as follows: If actual EBITDA was less than or equal to the minimum EBITDA (50% of target EBITDA), the US named executive officer was not entitled to any bonus. If, however, the EBITDA was greater than the minimum EBITDA, then the US named executive officer was entitled to receive a bonus in an amount equal to 2% of the US named executive officer’s annual target bonus for each 1% of EBITDA in excess of the minimum EBITDA. US named executive officers were eligible to earn an additional 1% of the target bonus for each 1% that actual EBITDA exceeded the target EBITDA. The EBITDA target applicable to Messrs. O’Leary and Laxton was based on total Company EBITDA and the EBITDA target applicable to Mr. Kiefer was based on the Company’s performance in the Western Hemisphere. The annual target bonus for each of the US named executive officers was 100% percent of his annual base salary.

For Messrs. O’Leary and Laxton only, if the Company’s actual working capital exceeded the Company’s working capital threshold targets, then their bonus could be reduced. Working capital is calculated as the sum of accounts receivable and inventories less the sum of trade accounts payable and accrued expenses, expressed as a percent of consolidated sales. The executive’s target bonus could not be reduced by more than 20%. For the year ended December 31, 2007, actual working capital did not exceed the Company’s working capital threshold targets.

The following table sets forth the EBITDA targets and actual percentage of bonus paid to each of Messrs. O’Leary, Laxton and Kiefer for the year ended December 31, 2007:

(in millions)


	Minimum EBITDA		Target EBITDA			Actual Percentage of Bonus Paid ⁽³⁾
O’Leary	$	60.5	$	121.0	⁽¹⁾	94	%
Laxton		60.5		121.0	⁽¹⁾	94	%
Kiefer		35.0		70.0	⁽²⁾	70	%

(1)	Target EBITDA is based on total Company EBITDA, as adjusted for the acquisition of PetroSteel.

(2)	Target EBITDA is based on Company EBITDA in the Western Hemisphere, as adjusted for the acquisition of PetroSteel.

(3)	The actual bonus amount paid to each of Messrs. O’Leary, Laxton and Kiefer under the Company’s Cash Bonus Plan for 2007 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, under the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

For Messrs. Cockburn and Craig, the target EBITDA was based on the Eastern Hemisphere’s performance. If the actual applicable EBITDA was less than or equal to the minimum regional EBITDA (60% of target EBITDA), Messrs. Cockburn and Craig were not entitled to any bonus. If regional EBITDA was greater than the minimum EBITDA, then they were eligible to receive a bonus in an amount equal to 2.5% of their annual target bonus for each 1% of EBITDA in excess of the minimum. Messrs. Cockburn and Craig were eligible to earn an additional 2.5% of the target bonus for each 1% that actual EBITDA exceeded the target regional EBITDA, however, the maximum bonus payable to Messrs. Cockburn and Craig was 100% and 150% of base salary, respectively. The annual target bonus for Messrs. Cockburn and Craig was 50% and 75%, respectively, of their annual base salary.

The following table sets forth the EBITDA targets and actual percentage of bonus paid to each of Messrs. Cockburn and Craig for the year ended December 31, 2007:

(in millions)


	Minimum Regional EBITDA		Target EBITDA			Actual Percentage of Bonus Paid ⁽²⁾
Cockburn	$	30.6	$	51.0	⁽¹⁾	128	%
Craig		30.6		51.0	⁽¹⁾	128	%

(1)	Target EBITDA is based on Company EBITDA in the Eastern Hemisphere.

(2)	The actual bonus amount paid to each of Messrs. Cockburn and Craig under the Company’s Cash Bonus Plan for 2007 is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, under the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

Equity-based incentive compensation

The Company formerly maintained the Edgen Murray L.P. Incentive Plan. In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007, the Edgen Murray L.P. Incentive Plan was terminated and all outstanding awards were replaced with awards with approximately equivalent value under the Edgen Murray II, L.P. Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”).

The Company established the Incentive Plan to assist the Company in attracting and retaining employees, including named executive officers and directors by offering them a greater stake in the Company’s success and a closer identity with the Company and to encourage ownership of the Company’s common units by such employees and directors. The Incentive Plan provides for the award of restricted common units that may be subject to time and/or performance based vesting. The general partner of Edgen Murray II, L.P., in its sole discretion, determines the number of restricted common units to award to any of the named executive officers, and the terms and conditions of such awards. There were no awards granted under this plan in 2007, other than the replacement awards described above.

In 2007, the Company established the Edgen Murray II, L.P. Option Plan (the “Option Plan”) to attract employees, including named executive officers, to the Company, to induce such employees to remain with the Company and to increase their efforts to make the Company’s business more successful and to enhance shareholder value.

The Option Plan provides for the award of options to purchase common units at no less than their fair market value as of the date the options are granted. The options are to have a 10-year term and are subject to such other terms and conditions, including vesting, as the general partner of Edgen Murray II, L.P. may determine.

In October 2007, the Company granted awards under the Option Plan to all named executive officers. Messrs. O’Leary and Laxton received a greater number of options, based on their higher levels of responsibility. These options were designed to incentivize the named executive officers to increase the long-term value of the Company. Accordingly, the options vest in annual increments over five years.

Vesting of restricted units and unit options under our equity-based plans may be accelerated in the case of certain events, such as a change in control or an approved sale of the Company or its subsidiaries. Such accelerated vesting is described more fully in the section below entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

In connection with the Contribution, we expect to terminate the Incentive Plan and Option Plan and replace them with substantially similar Edgen Murray Limited plans, and to replace all of the outstanding awards with awards of approximately equivalent value under the Edgen Murray Limited plans.

Perquisites

Perquisites for our named executive officers include auto allowances, supplemental health care payments, country club membership dues, life insurance premiums, tax preparation reimbursement and overseas housing and commuting allowances, if applicable. Generally, all named executive officers receive similar perquisites; however the exact perquisites are dependent upon specific circumstances and employment practices throughout the world. These perquisites help to provide competitive total compensation packages to the named executive officers, and we believe compare favorably with the perquisites provided by other employers in the Company’s industry who have officers with similar responsibilities.

General employee benefits

Health and welfare plans. The Company has established employee benefit plans for all employees, including medical, dental, group life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, in order to provide a competitive overall benefits package to attract and retain employees at all levels. Named executive officers are generally eligible to participate in such plans on the same basis as other employees.

Retirement plans. The Company has established several retirement plans to provide a competitive overall benefits package, and to attract and retain employees at all levels, including the Edgen Corporation 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). US named executive officers participate in the 401(k) Plan on the same basis as other employees. The 401(k) Plan is tax-qualified and eligible employees may accumulate savings for retirement on a pre-tax basis. The Company makes matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan on behalf of employees, on a nondiscretionary basis, up to 50% of the employee’s contributions, up to a maximum of 6% of the employee’s eligible compensation. In addition, the Company may, from time to time, make discretionary profit sharing contributions, the amount of which is determined by the Company in its sole discretion. Company contributions to the 401(k) Plan, including profit sharing contributions, and employer matching contributions, vest 25% after the second year of employment, 50% after the third year of employment, 75% after the fourth year of employment and 100% after the fifth year of employment. The Company also maintains a defined contribution pension plan for the benefit of certain employees in the United Kingdom, in which Mr. Craig participates.

Executive time off. Our named executive officers receive a guaranteed amount of Paid Time Off, or PTO, pursuant to employment agreements which generally provide for four weeks. Our named executive officers are expected to manage personal time off in a manner that does not impact performance or achievement of goals. Under the Company PTO benefit program, upon termination, neither Company employees nor named executive officers are entitled to payment of any unused portion of PTO.

Compensation committee report

Messrs. Daraviras, Luikart and DiPaolo perform the functions of a compensation committee for the Company and have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on such review and discussions, Messrs. Daraviras, Luikart and DiPaolo recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Registration Statement.

Nicholas Daraviras

James L. Luikart

Edward J. DiPaolo

Summary compensation table

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to compensation earned for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, by the Company’s named executive officers.


Name and principal positions	Year	Salary		Stock Awards⁽¹⁾		Option Awards ⁽²⁾		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation		All Other Compensation ⁽³⁾		Total
Daniel J. O’Leary	2007	$	425,000	$	113,377	$	24,592	$	401,119	$	46,683	$	1,010,771
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer	2006	$	275,000	$	219,033		—	$	439,875	$	100,175	$	1,034,083

David L. Laxton, III	2007	$	325,000	$	48,590	$	12,296	$	306,738	$	39,215	$	731,839
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	2006	$	225,000	$	119,027		—	$	336,375	$	74,648	$	755,460

Craig S. Kiefer	2007	$	285,000	$	32,393	$	6,148	$	168,000	$	30,350	$	521,891
President — Executive Vice-President – President and General Manager, Western Hemisphere	2006	$	200,000	$	32,393		—	$	207,000	$	27,572	$	446,965

Kenneth A. Cockburn ⁽⁴⁾	2007	$	625,814	$	57,984	$	4,678	$	398,957	$	3,137	$	1,090,570
Executive Vice President – Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere	2006	$	507,825	$	57,984		—	$	457,042	$	2,173	$	1,025,024

Michael F.A. Craig ⁽⁴⁾	2007	$	213,633	$	31,408	$	4,678	$	205,013	$	209,220	$	663,952
Deputy Managing Director, Eastern Hemisphere and Managing Director, Asia/Pacific – Eastern Hemisphere	2006	$	160,174	$	31,408		—	$	228,065	$	186,032	$	605,679

(1)

The amounts in this column represent the compensation costs recognized for financial reporting purposes for the respective fiscal years for the fair value of restricted common units awarded in the applicable and prior fiscal years in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) (“FAS 123(R)”), rather than an amount paid to or realized by the applicable named executive officer. FAS 123(R) requires compensation cost to be recognized over the requisite service period. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and result of operations — Critical accounting policies — Equity-based compensation.”

(2)

The amounts in this column represent the compensation costs recognized for financial reporting purposes for the fair value of unit options granted in 2007 in accordance with FAS 123(R), rather than an amount paid to or realized by the applicable named executive officer. The options vest over five years and have an exercise price of $1,000 per unit. The fair value of each unit option was calculated to be $487.84 at grant date by using a Black-Scholes pricing model. See “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and result of operations — Critical accounting policies — Equity-based compensation.”

(3)	The amounts in this column represent the dollar value of certain perquisites and other compensation paid to, or on behalf of, the named executive officer and his beneficiaries, as follows:


Name	Year	Insurance premiums ^(a)		Automobile allowance		Supplemental health care payment ^(b)		Retirement plan contribution		Club membership		All other compensation			Total
Daniel J. O’Leary	2007	$	8,292	$	14,400	$	9,500	$	6,750	$	7,742		—		$	46,684
David L. Laxton, III	2007	$	5,932	$	14,400	$	7,500	$	6,750	$	4,077	$	557	^(c)	$	39,216
Craig S. Kiefer	2007	$	3,630	$	14,400	$	7,500	$	4,820		—		—		$	30,350
Kenneth A. Cockburn	2007		—		—		—		—		—	$	3,137	^(d)	$	3,137
Michael F.A. Craig	2007		—		—		—	$	30,015		—	$	179,205	^(e)	$	209,220

(a)	Represents Company-paid premiums for the medical, life, long-term disability and other insurance plans maintained by the Company for the executive’s benefit.

(b)	Supplemental health care payments are paid in lump sum and are intended to supplement out of pocket health care costs, such as annual physicals for our US named executive officers.

(c)	Represents tax preparation reimbursement payment. Messrs. O’Leary and Laxton are entitled to reimbursements of up to $1,500 in tax preparation and financial planning expenses.

(d)	Represents insurance premiums paid on Mr. Cockburn’s behalf in connection with a UK private insurance program.

(e)	Mr. Craig is a UK national residing and working overseas in Singapore and is provided certain expatriate support including assistance with housing, commuting and other expenses associated with living abroad.

(4)

Messrs. Cockburn’s and Craig’s non-equity compensation is denominated in UK pounds. Accordingly, all compensation for Messrs. Cockburn and Craig has been converted from UK pounds into US dollars at the December 31, 2007 and 2006 exchange rates of 1.00 UK pound = 2.00 US dollars and 1.00 UK pound = 1.84 US dollars, respectively.

Grants of plan-based awards

The following table provides information with respect to 2007 concerning annual performance bonuses under our Cash Bonus Plan, restricted common units under our Incentive Plan and options under our Option Plan that were awarded to our named executive officers.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2007


		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards ⁽⁴⁾			All other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units	All other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options ⁽⁵⁾	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ⁽⁶⁾
Name	Grant Date	Threshold⁽¹⁾		Target ⁽²⁾		Maximum ⁽³⁾		Threshold	Target	Maximum			Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards
Daniel J. O’Leary	10/1/07	$	8,500	$	425,000		No limit	—	—	—	—	1,000	$	1,000	$	487,840
David L. Laxton, III	10/1/07	$	6,500	$	325,000		No limit	—	—	—	—	500	$	1,000	$	243,920
Craig S. Kiefer	10/1/07	$	4,800	$	240,000		No limit	—	—	—	—	250	$	1,000	$	121,960
Kenneth A. Cockburn	10/22/07	$	7,823	$	312,907	$	312,907	—	—	—	—	250	$	1,000	$	121,960
Michael F.A. Craig	10/22/07	$	4,006	$	160,225	$	240,337	—	—	—	—	250	$	1,000	$	121,960

(1)	The threshold amount included above assumes that actual EBITDA is at the lowest level of target EBITDA at which a bonus may be earned, as described in the section above entitled “Annual performance-based cash bonus.”

(2)	The target is calculated as 100% of the named executive officer’s target amount for 2007, as described in the section above entitled “Annual performance-based cash bonus.”

(3)	There is no maximum amount related to the Cash Bonus Plan for the named executive officers other than for Messrs. Cockburn and Craig, as described in the section entitled “Annual performance-based cash bonus.”

(4)	We have not included replacement grants made in 2007 under the Incentive Plan as a result of the cancellation of equity awards under the Edgen Murray L.P. Incentive Plan, as described in the section entitled “Equity-based incentive compensation.”

(5)	In connection with this offering, the common limited partnership units of Edgen Murray II L.P. were converted to a number of common shares of Edgen Murray Limited at a ratio of common limited partnership units to common shares.

(6)	Grant date fair value of stock and option awards was calculated as the number of units multiplied by $487.84, the fair value calculated by using a Black-Scholes pricing model.

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end


	Option Awards							Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable ⁽¹⁾		Equity Incentive Plan Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options	Option Exercise Price		Option Expiration Date	Number of Units That Have Not Vested ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	Market Value of Units That Have Not Vested ⁽³⁾		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Daniel J. O’Leary	—	1,000	⁽⁴⁾	—	$	1,000	10/1/17	3,148.32	$	3,148,320	—	—
David L. Laxton, III	—	500	⁽⁵⁾	—	$	1,000	10/1/17	1,349.28	$	1,349,280	—	—
Craig S. Kiefer	—	250	⁽⁶⁾	—	$	1,000	10/1/17	899.52	$	899,520	—	—
Kenneth A. Cockburn	—	250	⁽⁷⁾	—	$	1,000	10/22/17	2,146.85	$	2,146,850	—	—
Michael F.A. Craig	—	250	⁽⁸⁾	—	$	1,000	10/22/17	1,162.88	$	1,162,880	—	—

(1)	In connection with this offering, the common limited partnership units of Edgen Murray II, L.P. were converted to a number of common shares of Edgen Murray Limited at a ratio of common limited partnership units to common shares.

(2)

For Messrs. O’Leary, Laxton and Kiefer, one-half of the unvested units will vest February 1, 2009 and the remaining one-half will vest on February 1, 2010. For Messrs. Cockburn and Craig, one-fourth of the unvested units vested on February 1, 2008, another one-fourth will vest on February 1, 2009, another one-fourth will vest on February 1, 2010 and the remaining one-fourth will vest on February 1, 2011.

(3)

The Company’s equity securities do not have a readily determinable fair market value. The market or payout value was calculated as the number of unvested units multiplied by $1,000, the price paid by unrelated third party investors in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007. We believe the consideration paid for such units is the best estimate of fair value for our equity awards at December 31, 2007.

(4)	Represents grant to Mr. O’Leary of 1,000 options under the Option Plan on October 1, 2007, which vest in equal annual installments on the following dates: October 1, 2008, October 1, 2009, October 1, 2010, October 1, 2011 and October 1, 2012.

(5)	Represents grant to Mr. Laxton of 500 options under the Option Plan on October 1, 2007, which vest in equal annual installments on the following dates: October 1, 2008, October 1, 2009, October 1, 2010, October 1, 2011 and October 1, 2012.

(6)	Represents grant to Mr. Kiefer of 250 options under the Option Plan on October 1, 2007, which vest in equal annual installments on the following dates: October 1, 2008, October 1, 2009, October 1, 2010, October 1, 2011 and October 1, 2012.

(7)	Represents grant to Mr. Cockburn of 250 options under the Option Plan on October 22, 2007, which vest in equal annual installments on the following dates: October 22, 2008, October 22, 2009, October 22, 2010, October 22, 2011 and October 22, 2012.

(8)	Represents grant to Mr. Craig of 250 options under the Option Plan on October 22, 2007, which vest in equal annual installments on the following dates: October 22, 2008, October 22, 2009, October 22, 2010, October 22, 2011 and October 22, 2012.

Option exercises and stock vested


	Option Awards		Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise	Value Realized on Exercise	Number of Units Acquired on Vesting	Value Realized on Vesting ⁽¹⁾
Daniel J. O’Leary	—	—	1,049.44	$	1,049,440
David L. Laxton, III	—	—	449.76	$	449,760
Craig S. Kiefer	—	—	299.84	$	299,840
Kenneth A. Cockburn	—	—	536.71	$	536,710
Michael F.A. Craig	—	—	290.72	$	290,720

(1)

The Company’s equity securities do not have a readily determinable fair market value. The market or payout value was calculated as the number of units subject to vesting multiplied by $1,000 per unit, the price paid by unrelated third party investors in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007. We believe the consideration paid for such units is the best estimate of fair value for our equity awards at December 31, 2007.

Employment agreements and potential payments upon termination or change of control

Each of our named executive officers is party to an employment agreement with the Company that provides for base salary, bonus opportunity and additional compensation. In addition, each named executive officer who has received a grant under the Company’s Incentive Plan and Option Plan is party to award agreements which describe the material terms of such awards. The material terms of these agreements are described below with respect to each named executive officer, including the potential amounts payable to each named executive officer upon termination of his employment under various circumstances. The potential payments described below are estimated based on the assumption that such termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2007. Actual payments, if any, may be more or less than the amounts described below. The Committee believes that these employment agreements provide an incentive to the named executive officers to remain with the Company and serve to align the interest of the named executive officers and shareholders, including in the event of a potential acquisition of the Company.

Daniel J. O’Leary. Mr. O’Leary’s employment agreement with EMC, effective January 1, 2008, entitles him to a base salary of $446,250 per year ($425,000 in 2007), subject to increase by the Board in its discretion. In addition to base salary, Mr. O’Leary is entitled to earn an annual bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan, described above, that is determined as a percentage of his base salary based on the Company’s annual performance, but subject to a downward working capital adjustment. The annual bonus can exceed 100% of his base salary if actual EBITDA exceeds the EBITDA target. The terms of the Cash Bonus Plan are described in more depth above under the caption “Annual performance-based cash bonus.”

Mr. O’Leary’s employment agreement also provides for a supplemental payment of $9,500 per year for miscellaneous expenses not directly reimbursed by the Company including, but not limited to, annual physicals, and an allowance of up to $1,500 per year for tax and financial preparation and planning. Finally, Mr. O’Leary’s employment agreement provides that the Company will pay the premiums on a term life insurance policy valued at $1,000,000 for the benefit of Mr. O’Leary’s beneficiaries, and an automobile allowance of $1,200 per month.

In addition to the payment of accrued, but unpaid, annual bonus and base salary, if Mr. O’Leary’s employment with the Company is terminated, for certain reasons described below, he may be entitled to severance payments. Mr. O’Leary’s right to any severance payments described below are conditioned upon his continued compliance with the noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions of his employment agreement, which prevent him from competing with the Company’s and its affiliates’ and subsidiaries’ business and from soliciting customers, suppliers, and employees away from the Company and its affiliates and subsidiaries for a period of twelve months following

termination of employment. Accordingly, if Mr. O’Leary breaches those provisions of his employment agreement during any period in which he is entitled to severance payments, the Company is entitled to terminate further severance payments and seek to enforce the noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions.

If Mr. O’Leary is terminated due to disability, his employment agreement provides that he will be paid his current annual salary over the twelve months following the termination date and a pro-rated bonus for the year of termination. If Mr. O’Leary’s employment with the Company terminates due to death, Mr. O’Leary’s beneficiaries will be entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy on the life of Mr. O’Leary in the amount of $1,000,000. In the event that payment of the proceeds is refused, the Company will commence payment to Mr. O’Leary’s beneficiaries of twelve months of base salary continuation, up to a maximum of the annual base salary in effect at the time of death.

If Mr. O’Leary is terminated by the Company without cause, his employment agreement provides that he is entitled to continued payment of base salary for the greater of twelve months or the remainder of the employment term, a pro-rated bonus for the year of termination and continued medical and health benefits for a one-year period following such termination. Finally, if Mr. O’Leary’s employment terminates in connection with a change in control, he is entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to twelve months base salary, a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination and continued medical and health benefits for a one-year period following such termination.

If, during Mr. O’Leary’s employment with the Company, there occurs a change in control of the Company, or an approved sale of the Company, then Mr. O’Leary’s unvested restricted units will vest in full. If such change in control occurred on December 31, 2007, then 3,148.32 restricted units would vest immediately. In addition, upon a change in control, 1,000 unit options would vest and become exercisable under the Option Plan, subject to the right of the administrator to accelerate the vesting of all options.

Assuming Mr. O’Leary’s employment was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2007, such payments and benefits have an estimated value of:


	Cash Severance		Bonus		Supplemental Payment		Medical Insurance Continuation		Life Insurance Continuation		Value of Accelerated Equity and Performance Awards ⁽¹⁾
Without Cause	$	425,000	$	425,000	$	9,500	$	6,198	$	3,686		—
Change of Control	$	425,000	$	425,000	$	9,500	$	6,198	$	3,686	$	3,148,320
Death ⁽²⁾	$	425,000		—		—		—		—		—
Disability	$	425,000	$	425,000		—		—		—		—

(1)

The Company’s equity securities do not have a readily determinable fair market value. The market or payout value was calculated as the number of unvested units multiplied by $1,000, the price paid by unrelated third party investors in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007. We believe the consideration paid for the common limited partnership units is the best estimate of fair value for our equity awards at December 31, 2007.

(2)

This amount is only payable in the event that payment of the proceeds of a $1,000,000 life insurance policy is refused. In such event, the Company will commence payment to Mr. O’Leary’s beneficiaries of twelve months of base salary continuation, up to a maximum of the annual base salary in effect at the time of death.

David L. Laxton, III. Mr. Laxton’s employment agreement with EMC, effective January 1, 2007, entitles him to a base salary of $325,000 per year, subject to increase by the Board in its discretion. In addition to base salary, Mr. Laxton is entitled to earn an annual bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan that is determined as a percentage of his base salary based on the Company’s annual performance, but subject to a downward working capital adjustment. The annual bonus can exceed 100% of his base salary if actual EBITDA exceeds the target EBITDA threshold. The terms of the Cash Bonus Plan are described in more depth above under the section entitled “Annual performance-based cash bonus.”

100

Mr. Laxton’s employment agreement also provides for a supplemental payment of $7,500 per year for miscellaneous expenses not directly reimbursed by the Company including, but not limited to, annual physicals, and an allowance of up to $1,500 per year for tax and financial preparation and planning. Finally, Mr. Laxton’s employment agreement provides that the Company will pay the premiums on a term life insurance policy valued at $1,000,000 for the benefit of Mr. Laxton’s beneficiaries, and an automobile allowance of $1,200 per month.

In addition to the payment of accrued, but unpaid, annual bonus and base salary, if Mr. Laxton’s employment with the Company is terminated, for certain reasons described below, he may be entitled to severance payments. Mr. Laxton’s right to any severance payments described below are conditioned upon his continued compliance with the noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions of his employment agreement, which prevent him from competing with the Company’s and its affiliates’ and subsidiaries’ business and from soliciting customers, suppliers, and employees away from the Company and its affiliates and subsidiaries for a period of twelve months following termination of employment. Accordingly, if Mr. Laxton breaches those provisions of his employment agreement during any period in which he is entitled to severance payments, the Company is entitled to terminate further severance payments and seek to enforce the noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions.

If Mr. Laxton is terminated due to disability, his employment agreement provides that he will be paid his current annual salary over the twelve months following the termination date and a pro-rated bonus for the year of termination. If Mr. Laxton’s employment with the Company terminates due to death, Mr. Laxton’s beneficiaries will be entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy on the life of Mr. Laxton in the amount of $1,000,000. In the event that payment of the proceeds is refused, the Company will commence payment to Mr. Laxton’s beneficiaries of twelve months of base salary continuation, up to a maximum of the annual base salary in effect at the time of death.

If Mr. Laxton is terminated by the Company without cause, his employment agreement provides that he is entitled to continued payment of base salary for the greater of twelve months or the remainder of the employment term, a pro-rated bonus for the year of termination and continued medical and health benefits for a one-year period following such termination. Finally, if Mr. Laxton’s employment terminates in connection with a change in control, he is entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to twelve months base salary, a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination and continued medical and health benefits for a one-year period following such termination.

If, during Mr. Laxton’s employment with the Company, there occurs a change in control of the Company or an approved sale of the Company, then Mr. Laxton’s unvested restricted units will vest in full. If such change in control occurred on December 31, 2007, then 1,349.28 restricted units would vest immediately. In addition, upon a change in control, 500 unit options would vest and become exercisable under the Option Plan, subject to the right of the administrator to accelerate the vesting of all options.

Assuming Mr. Laxton’s employment was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2007, such payments and benefits have an estimated value of:


	Cash Severance			Bonus		Supplemental Payment		Medical Insurance Continuation		Life Insurance Continuation		Value of Accelerated Equity and Performance Awards ⁽¹⁾
Without Cause	$	325,000		$	325,000	$	7,500	$	4,643	$	2,348		—
Change of Control	$	325,000		$	325,000	$	7,500	$	4,643	$	2,348	$	1,349,280
Death	$	325,000	⁽²⁾		—		—		—		—		—
Disability	$	325,000			—		—		—		—		—

(1)

The Company’s equity securities do not have a readily determinable fair market value. The market or payout value was calculated as the number of unvested units multiplied by $1,000, the price paid by unrelated third party investors in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007. We believe the consideration paid for the common limited partnership units is the best estimate of fair value for our equity awards at December 31, 2007.

101

(2)

This amount is only payable in the event that payment of the proceeds of a $1,000,000 life insurance policy is refused. In such event, the Company will commence payment to Mr. Laxton’s beneficiaries of twelve months of base salary continuation, up to a maximum of the annual base salary in effect at the time of death.

Craig S. Kiefer. Mr. Kiefer’s employment agreement with EMC, successor to Edgen Carbon Products Group, L.L.C., effective April 30, 2004, entitles him to a base salary of $285,000 per year, subject to increase by the Board in its discretion. In addition to base salary, Mr. Kiefer is entitled to earn an annual bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan that is determined as a percentage of his base salary based on the Company’s annual performance. The annual bonus can exceed 100% of his base salary if actual EBITDA exceeds the target EBITDA threshold. The terms of the Cash Bonus Plan are described in more depth above under the section entitled “Annual performance-based cash bonus.”

In 2005, Mr. Kiefer’s employment agreement was amended to provide for a supplemental payment of $7,500 per year for miscellaneous expenses not directly reimbursed by the Company including, but not limited to, annual physicals. Finally, Mr. Kiefer’s employment agreement provides that the Company will pay an automobile allowance of $1,000 per month.

In addition to the payment of accrued, but unpaid, annual bonus and base salary, if Mr. Kiefer’s employment with the Company is terminated, for certain reasons described below, he may be entitled to severance payments. Mr. Kiefer’s right to any severance payments described below are conditioned upon his continued compliance with the noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions of his employment agreement, which prevent him from competing with the Company’s and its affiliates’ and subsidiaries’ business and from soliciting customers, suppliers, and employees away from the Company and its affiliates and subsidiaries for a period of twelve months following termination of employment. Accordingly, if Mr. Kiefer breaches those provisions of his employment agreement during any period in which he is entitled to severance payments, the Company is entitled to terminate further severance payments and seek to enforce the noncompetition and nonsolicitation provisions.

If Mr. Kiefer is terminated due to disability, his employment agreement provides that he will be paid his current annual salary over the twelve months following the termination date and a pro-rated bonus for the year of termination. If Mr. Kiefer’s employment with the Company terminates due to death, Mr. Kiefer’s beneficiaries will be entitled to continued payment of Mr. Kiefer’s base salary for twelve months following his death and a pro-rated bonus for the year in which such termination occurs. If Mr. Kiefer is terminated by the Company without cause, his employment agreement provides that he is entitled to continued payment of base salary for twelve months following termination, annual bonus for the year of termination as though he had remained employed for the duration of such year and continued medical and health benefits for a one-year period following such termination. Finally, if Mr. Kiefer’s employment terminates in connection with a change in control, he is entitled to continued payment of base salary for twelve months following such termination, a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination and continued medical and health benefits for a one-year period following such termination.

If, during Mr. Kiefer’s employment with the Company, there occurs a change in control of the Company or an approved sale of the Company, then Mr. Kiefer’s unvested restricted units will vest in full. If such change in control occurred on December 31, 2007, then 899.52 restricted units would vest immediately. In addition, upon a change in control, 250 unit options would vest and become exercisable under the Option Plan, subject to the right of the administrator to accelerate the vesting of all options.

102

Assuming Mr. Kiefer’s employment was terminated under each of these circumstances on December 31, 2007, such payments and benefits have an estimated value of:


	Cash Severance		Bonus		Supplemental Payment		Medical Insurance Continuation		Life Insurance Continuation		Value of Accelerated Equity and Performance Awards ⁽¹⁾
Without Cause	$	240,000	$	240,000	$	7,500	$	4,643	$	47	$	—
Change of Control	$	240,000	$	240,000	$	7,500	$	4,643	$	47	$	899,520
Death	$	240,000	$	240,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Disability	$	240,000	$	240,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

(1)

The Company’s equity securities do not have a readily determinable fair market value. The market or payout value was calculated as the number of unvested units multiplied by $1,000, the price paid by unrelated third party investors in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction on May 11, 2007. We believe the consideration paid for the common limited partnership units is the best estimate of fair value for our equity awards at December 31, 2007.

Kenneth A. Cockburn. Mr. Cockburn’s employment agreement with EM Europe, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, dated December 16, 2005, provides that he will be employed as EM Europe’s Managing Director. Mr. Cockburn is entitled to a base salary for 2008 of £326,692, which may be increased by the Board. In addition to base salary, Mr. Cockburn is entitled to earn an annual bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan based on the Company’s annual performance. The terms of the Cash Bonus Plan are described in more depth above under the caption “Annual performance-based cash bonus.” Mr. Cockburn is entitled to seven weeks vacation. The employment agreement may be terminated by us upon Mr. Cockburn’s disability, for cause, or for any reason other than cause (with severance payable upon termination other than for cause in an amount equal to Mr. Cockburn’s annual base salary for the remaining term under the agreement).

If, during Mr. Cockburn’s employment with the Company, there occurs a change in control of the Company or an approved sale of the Company, then Mr. Cockburn’s unvested restricted units will vest in full. If such change in control occurred on December 31, 2007, then 2,146.85 restricted units would vest immediately and the aggregate value of the accelerated restricted units would be $2,146,850. Upon a change in control, 250 unit options would vest and become exercisable under the Option Plan, subject to the right of the administrator to accelerate the vesting of all options.

Edgen Murray LTD S-1/A