As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25, 2016

Registration No. 333-212081

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

AMENDMENT NO. 1

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

VANTAGE DRILLING INTERNATIONAL

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Cayman Islands

1381

N/A

(State or other jurisdiction of

Incorporation or organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

777 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800

Houston, TX 77056

(281) 404-4700

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Maples Corporate Services Limited

PO Box 309

Ugland House

Grand Cayman

KY1-1104, Cayman Islands

(345) 949 8066

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

With copies to:

Douglas E. Stewart

Vantage Drilling International

777 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800

Houston, Texas 77056

(281) 404-4700

Rod Miller, Esq.

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP

28 Liberty Street

New York, NY 10005

(212) 530-5000

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE



Title of each Class of Securities to be Registered	Amount to be Registered(1)	Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Unit(2)	Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)(2)	Amount of Registration Fee(2)
Units of Stapled Securities (“Stapled Securities”) (3)	2,999,100
Ordinary Shares, par value $0.001 per share	23,050,812 (4)	$75.00 (5)	$224,932,500.00 (6)	$22,650.71 (6)
1% / 12% Step-Up Senior Secured Third Lien Convertible Notes due 2030 (“Notes”) (7)	$1,916,943,664.03	100%	$1,916,943,664.03	$193,036.23
Subsidiary Guarantees of the Notes (8)
Total				$215,686.94 (9)

(1)	The units of Stapled Securities and the ordinary shares will be offered for resale by selling holders pursuant to the shelf prospectus contained herein.

(2)	Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

(3)	Each unit of Stapled Securities initially represents one ordinary share and an original issuance amount of $172.61 principal amount of Notes.

(4)

Represents (i) 2,999,100 ordinary shares included in the Stapled Securities described in note (3) above, and (ii) 20,051,712 ordinary shares, representing the total aggregate number of ordinary shares into which the Notes are convertible (at the initial conversion price of $95.60 per ordinary share) on the maturity date thereof after giving effect to all payments of pay-in-kind interest. Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act, such number of ordinary shares registered hereby shall include an indeterminate number of ordinary shares that may be issued in connection with a share split, share dividend, recapitalization or similar event.

(5)

Our ordinary shares are not traded on any national exchange and in accordance with Rule 457 under the Securities Act, the offering price per share was estimated using the equity value for the ordinary shares as of the date of the consummation of the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Offshore Group Investment Limited and its Affiliated Debtors.

(6)

Pursuant to Rule 457(i) under the Securities Act, there is no additional filing fee with respect to the ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes because no additional consideration will be received in connection with the exercise of such conversion. Accordingly, the registration fee in respect of the ordinary shares was calculated solely on the basis of the 2,999,100 ordinary shares included in the Stapled Securities.

(7)	Consists of (i) $517,674,651.00 aggregate principal amount of Notes described in note (3) above, together with (ii) all payments of interest in the form of pay-in-kind interest through the maturity date.

(8)	Pursuant to Rule 457(n) under the Securities Act, no separate fee for the guarantees is payable.

(9)	A total of $191,692.34 has previously been paid in connection with prior filings of this Registration Statement. A registration fee of $23,994.60 is being transmitted herewith.

The registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

Table of Additional Registrant Guarantors


Exact Name of Registrant Guarantor	State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization	I.R.S. Employer Identification Number
Dragonquest Holdings Company¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Emerald Driller Company¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
P2020 Rig Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
P2021 Rig. Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Sapphire Driller Company¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Deepwater Company¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Driller I Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Driller II Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Driller III Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Driller IV Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Driller VI Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Drilling Africa¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Holdings Malaysia I Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage International Management Co.¹	Cayman Islands	N/A
Vantage Holdings Cyprus ODC Limited²	Cyprus	N/A
Vantage Deepwater Drilling, Inc.¹	Delaware	27-5373668
Vantage Delaware Holdings, LLC¹	Delaware	N/A
Vantage Energy Services, Inc.¹	Delaware	51-0599779
Vantage Holding Hungary Kft.³	Hungary	N/A
PT. Vantage Drilling Company Indonesia⁴	Indonesia	N/A
Vantage Drilling Labuan I Ltd.⁵	Malaysia	N/A
Vantage Drilling (Malaysia) I Sdn. Bhd.⁶	Malaysia	N/A
Vantage Drilling Netherlands B.V.⁷	The Netherlands	N/A
Vantage Driller ROCO S.R.L.⁸	Romania	N/A
Vantage International Management Company Pte. Ltd.⁹	Singapore	N/A

(1)	The address for each of these co-registrants is c/o Vantage Energy Services, Inc., 777 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056, Telephone: (281) 404-4700.

(2)	The address for this co-registrant is, Diagoru 2, ERA HOUSE, 10th Floor, Nicosia, Cyprus 1097.

(3)	The address for this co-registrant is Wesselenyi utca, 16, Budapest, Hungary H-1077.

(4)	The address for this co-registrant is Graha Mampang Bldg., 5th Floor, J1. Mampang Prapatan Raya No. 100, Kec. Pancoran, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia.

(5)	The address for this co-registrant is Tiara Labuan, Jalan Tanjung Batu, 87000 F.T. Labuan, Malaysia.

(6)	The address for this co-registrant is Business Suite 19A-19-3, Level 25, Wisma UOA Centre, 19 Jalan Pinang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 50450.

(7)	The address for this co-registrant is 1076 AZ Amsterdam, Locatellikade 1, Netherlands.

(8)	The address for this co-registrant is Bucharest Sector 1, Strada Dumitru Florescu, Nr.17, Floor 2, Room 15, Bucharest, Romania.

(9)	The address for this co-registrant is 1 Jalan Kilang Timor, #07-01, Pacific Tech Centre, Singapore 159303.

The name and address of the agent for service for each of the co-registrants is Maples Corporate Services Limited, PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands. The telephone number, including area code, of the agent for service for each of the co-registrants is (345) 949 8066.

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling holders may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to Completion

Preliminary Prospectus dated August 25, 2016

PROSPECTUS

2,999,100 Units of Stapled Securities, representing

2,999,100 Ordinary Shares

and

$517,674,651.00 original issuance amount of 1%/12% Step-Up Senior Secured Third Lien Convertible Notes due 2030

LOGO

Vantage Drilling International

Stapled Securities

This prospectus relates to the offer and resale of up to an aggregate of 2,999,100 units of stapled securities (the “Stapled Securities”) (including the ordinary shares of Vantage Drilling International (the “Ordinary Shares” or “New Shares”) (i) forming a part thereof that may become separated therefrom as described under “Description of Stapled Securities—General—Automatic Separation” and (ii) that are issuable upon the conversion of the Notes (as defined below) forming a part thereof) of Vantage Drilling International by the selling holders identified in this prospectus. Each Stapled Security initially represents one Ordinary Share and an original issuance amount of $172.61 principal amount of 1%/12% Step-Up Senior Secured Third Lien Convertible Notes due 2030 (the “Notes” or “Convertible Notes”), in each case subject to adjustment as further described under “Description of Stapled Securities.” Interest on the Notes will accrue at a rate of 1% per year from February 10, 2016, the issue date of the Notes, through, but not including, the fourth anniversary of February 10, 2016. From and after the fourth anniversary of February 10, 2016 and through the maturity date of the Notes, interest will accrue at a rate of 12% per year. Interest on the Notes is payable in kind, semi-annually (in arrears) by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the Notes. We are not selling any Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares under this prospectus. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares being offered by the selling holders.

The selling holders may offer Stapled Securities (as well as any Ordinary Shares that may become separated therefrom or that are issuable upon the conversion of the Notes forming a part thereof) from time to time, if and to the extent as they may determine, through public or private transactions or through other means described under “Plan of Distribution” at prevailing market prices, at prices different than prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices. The selling holders may sell Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares through agents they select or through underwriters and dealers they select. The selling holders also may sell Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares directly to investors. If the selling holders use agents, underwriters or dealers to sell the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, we will name such agents, underwriters or dealers and describe any applicable commissions or discounts in a supplement to this prospectus if required. Neither our Stapled Securities nor our Ordinary Shares are listed on any national securities exchange and no public market currently exists for our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

Investing in our Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares involves risks. See “Risk Factors” for a discussion of certain risks that you should consider before buying our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Prospectus dated , 2016.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY			1
RISK FACTORS			14
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONCERNING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS			38
USE OF PROCEEDS			40
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES			41
MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND POLICY			42
OFFERING PRICE			42
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA			43
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			47
BUSINESS			63
MANAGEMENT			73
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING HOLDERS			89
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS			94
SECURITIES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE			96
DESCRIPTION OF STAPLED SECURITIES			97
DESCRIPTION OF SHARE CAPITAL			102
DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES			107
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION			165
TAXATION			167
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS / ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES			173
LEGAL MATTERS			174
EXPERTS			174
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION			174
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			F-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

For investors outside the United States: We have not done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. You are required to inform yourselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to this offering and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary may not contain all the information that may be important to you. You should carefully read the entire prospectus before making an investment decision, especially the information presented under the heading “Risk Factors.” In this prospectus, except as otherwise indicated herein, or as the context may otherwise require, “VDI,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Vantage Drilling International and its subsidiaries.

Our Company

Vantage Drilling International, a Cayman Islands exempted company, is an international offshore drilling company focused on operating a fleet of modern, high specification drilling units. Our principal business is to contract drilling units, related equipment and work crews, primarily on a dayrate basis to drill oil and natural gas wells for our customers. We also provide construction supervision services for drilling units owned by others. Through our fleet of drilling units, we are a provider of offshore contract drilling services to major, national and independent oil and natural gas companies, focused primarily on international markets. As of July 29, 2016, our offshore drilling fleet consisted of seven ultra-premium high specification drilling units: four jackup rigs and three drillships (also referred to as “floaters”).

Total revenues were $772.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $882.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Net income was $22.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $93.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

The Company was previously known as Offshore Group Investment Limited and changed its corporate name to Vantage Drilling International effective February 11, 2016.

Restructuring Agreement and Bankruptcy Proceedings under Chapter 11

On December 1, 2015, we and Vantage Drilling Company (“VDC”), our former parent company, entered into a restructuring support agreement (the “Restructuring Agreement”) with a majority of our secured creditors. Pursuant to the terms of the Restructuring Agreement, the Company agreed to pursue a pre-packaged plan of reorganization (the “Plan of Reorganization”) under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and VDC would commence official liquidation proceedings under the laws of the Cayman Islands. On December 2, 2015, pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement, the Company acquired two subsidiaries responsible for the management of the Company from VDC in exchange for a $61.5 million promissory note (the “VDC Note”).

On December 3, 2015, the Company and 24 debtor subsidiaries, including five debtor subsidiaries of VDC who were guarantors of the Company’s pre-bankruptcy secured debt, filed the Plan of Reorganization in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (In re Vantage Drilling International (F/K/A Offshore Group Investment Limited), et al., Case No. 15-12422). On January 15, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware confirmed the Plan of Reorganization and the Company emerged from bankruptcy effective February 10, 2016 (the “Emergence”). The significant elements of the Plan of Reorganization included the Company’s:

•

entrance into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) providing for (i) a $32.0 million revolving letter of credit facility to replace the Company’s existing $32.0 million revolving letter of credit commitment under its pre-petition credit facility and (ii) $143.0 million of term loans into which the claims of the lenders under the Company’s pre-petition credit facility were converted;

•

engagement in a rights offering for $75.0 million of new 10% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020 (the “Senior Secured Notes” or “10% Second Lien Notes”) for certain holders of its secured debt claims;

•

issuance of 4,344,959 Ordinary Shares and approximately $750.0 million of Notes to certain creditors holding approximately $2.5 billion of pre-petition secured debt claims. The Ordinary Shares and the Notes issued to these creditors are stapled together (the “Stapled Securities”) and may only be traded together and not separately; and

•

cancellation of VDC’s former equity interest in the Company and immediately following that event, conversion of the VDC Note into 655,094 Ordinary Shares in accordance with the terms thereof.

The Plan of Reorganization allowed the Company to maintain all operating assets and agreements. All trade payables, credits, wages and other related obligations were unimpaired by the Plan of Reorganization.

Our Strengths

We believe we have the following competitive strengths:

Premium fleet. Our fleet is currently comprised of seven ultra-premium high specification drilling units: four jackup rigs and three drillships. We believe the Emerald Driller, Sapphire Driller, Aquamarine Driller and Topaz Driller are ultra-premium jackup rigs due to their ability to drill in deeper depths, as well as their enhanced operational efficiency and technical capabilities when compared to a majority of the current global jackup rig fleet, which is primarily comprised of older, smaller, less capable rigs using less modern technology. The Platinum Explorer, Titanium Explorer and Tungsten Explorer are ultra-deepwater drillships that are designed to drill in up to 12,000 feet of water. Our drillships are currently equipped to drill in water depths of up to 10,000 feet. We believe 10,000 feet to be the upper-limit water depth currently being developed by leading offshore exploration and production companies, though we also believe that they are evaluating future deepwater development projects in water depths in excess of 10,000 feet.

Proven track record. We have a proven track record of successfully managing, constructing, marketing and operating offshore drilling units. Our in-house team of engineers and construction personnel has overseen complex rig construction projects. As a result, our rigs have generally been delivered within budget and either on time or ahead of schedule.

Experienced management and operational team. We benefit from our management team, which has extensive experience in the drilling industry, including international and domestic public company experience involving numerous acquisitions and debt and equity financings.

Strategy

Our strategy includes:

Maintain significant liquidity. In response to the significant downturn in the drilling industry, we are strategically preserving our liquidity. Completing the Plan of Reorganization significantly reduced our debt service obligations and we have no significant maturities until December 2019. We are working to optimize our workforce for our current level of operations, deferring maintenance and capital expenditures and working to extend our contract backlog.

Capitalize on customer demand for modern, high specification units. We own and manage high specification drilling units, which are well suited to meet the requirements of customers for efficiently drilling through deep and complex geological formations, and drilling horizontally. Additionally, high specification drilling units generally provide faster drilling and moving times. A majority of the bid invitations for jackups that we receive require high specification units. Aside from their drilling capabilities, we believe that customers generally prefer new drilling units because of improved safety features and less frequent downtime for maintenance. New, modern drilling units are also generally preferred by crews, which makes it easier to hire and retain high quality operating personnel.

Focus on international markets. We have been able to successfully deploy and operate our drilling units in some of the most active international oil and natural gas producing regions. We believe that exposure to certain international markets with major, national and independent oil and natural gas companies will increase the predictability of our cash flows because those markets have exhibited less historical cyclicality. We also believe that our internationally diverse platform reduces our exposure to a single market.

Expand key industry relationships. We are focused on expanding relationships with major, national and independent oil and natural gas companies, focused primarily on international markets, which we believe will allow us to obtain longer-term contracts to build our backlog of business when dayrates and operating margins justify entering into such contracts. We believe that our existing relationships with these companies have contributed to our historically strong contract backlog. Longer-term contracts increase revenue visibility and mitigate some of the volatility in cash flows caused by cyclical market downturns.

Maintain our deepwater exposure. We believe our customers will continue an emphasis on exploration in deeper waters due, in part, to technological developments that have made such exploration more feasible and cost-effective. We believe that the water-depth capability of our ultra-deepwater drilling units is attractive to our customers and allows us to compete effectively in obtaining long-term deepwater drilling contracts. We may seek to manage or acquire additional deepwater drilling units to service this market.

Risk Factors

Investing in our Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares involves a number of risks. Some of the more significant challenges and risks include the following:

•

Our industry is highly competitive, cyclical and subject to intense price competition;

•

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations;

•

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws;

•

Low prices for oil and natural gas may reduce demand for our services and could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability;

•

Our business is affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions and the condition of the oil and natural gas industry;

•

Our offshore drilling operations could be adversely impacted by changes in regulation of offshore oil and gas development activity; and

•

The price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares at or above the offering price.

For a discussion of the significant risks associated with our business, our industry and investing in our Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares, you should read the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

Additional Information

Vantage Drilling International is a Cayman Islands exempted company. The Company was previously known as Offshore Group Investment Limited and changed its corporate name to Vantage Drilling International effective February 11, 2016. Our principal executive offices are located at 777 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056, and our telephone number is (281) 404-4700. The address of our Internet site is www.vantagedrilling.com. This Internet address is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to function as a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information contained in this Internet address is included or incorporated by reference herein.

The Offering

The following summary highlights certain material information contained elsewhere in this prospectus but does not contain all the information that you should consider before investing in our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares. We urge you to read this entire prospectus, including the “Risk Factors” section and our consolidated financial statements and related notes.

Summary of Stapled Securities

The following summary contains basic information about the Stapled Securities and is not intended to be complete. It does not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of the Stapled Securities, please refer the section of this prospectus entitled “Description of the Stapled Securities.”

What are the Stapled Securities?

The Stapled Securities are units of stapled securities, each initially comprised of one Ordinary Share and an original issuance amount of $172.61 principal amount of Notes, in each case subject to adjustment as described further herein.

What payments can I expect to receive as a holder of the Stapled Securities?

You will be entitled to receive the following interest on the Notes comprising a part of your Stapled Securities: Prior to the fourth anniversary of February 10, 2016, the issue date of the Notes (the “Issue Date”), interest will accrue at a rate of 1% per year, payable in kind, semi-annually (in arrears) by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the Notes. From and after the fourth anniversary of the Issue Date through the maturity date of the Notes (the “Maturity Date”), interest will accrue at a rate of 12% per year, payable in kind, semi-annually (in arrears) by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the Notes. At final maturity, all accrued and unpaid interest will be paid together with principal in cash. With respect to the Ordinary Shares, including those that comprise Stapled Securities, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the immediate future. See “Market Prices and Dividend Policy.”

Will my rights as a holder of the Stapled Securities be any different than the rights of a beneficial owner of separately held Notes or a beneficial holder of separately held Ordinary Shares?

No. As a holder of Stapled Securities, you are the beneficial owner of the Notes and Ordinary Shares represented by your Stapled Securities. As such, through your broker or financial institution and the Depository Trust Company, or DTC, you will have exactly the same rights and privileges, including rights to receive distributions and interest, rights in the event of default under the indenture governing the Notes, and rights to receive communications and notices as a beneficial holder of separately held Ordinary Shares and Notes, as applicable, would have through a broker or other financial institution and DTC.

Will I have voting rights as a holder of Stapled Securities?

Yes. As a holder of Stapled Securities, you will have the same voting rights with respect to the Ordinary Shares that form a part of the Stapled Securities as a beneficial holder of separately held Ordinary Shares. You will have one vote per Ordinary Share on all matters to be voted by the holders of the Ordinary Shares. However, in respect of the Notes, you will not be entitled to any voting or other rights with respect to any Ordinary Shares that the Notes are convertible into, until such Ordinary Shares are issued. The Notes are convertible into Ordinary Shares as described under “Description of the Notes — Conversion Rights.”

Can I separate my Stapled Securities into Ordinary Shares and Notes or recombine Ordinary Shares and Notes to form Stapled Securities?

No. The Stapled Securities may not be separated and may only be traded together as single unit.

Will the Notes or Ordinary Shares of which the Stapled Securities are comprised be listed on an exchange?

We do not currently anticipate that the Notes or the Ordinary Shares will be listed on any national securities exchange.

What will be the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Stapled Securities?

As discussed under “Taxation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—U.S. Holders of the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will, and the Indenture requires holders of the Stapled Securities to, treat the Stapled Securities as a single, indivisible investment constituting equity in the Company.

Because there is no statutory, judicial or administrative authority directly addressing the U.S. federal income tax treatment of an instrument substantially similar to the Stapled Securities, we urge you to consult your own tax advisor concerning the consequences of an investment in the Stapled Securities. For additional information, see “Taxation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

Summary of the Notes

The following summary contains basic information about the Notes and is not intended to be complete. It does not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of the Notes, please refer the section of the Prospectus entitled “Description of the Notes.”


Issuer		Vantage Drilling International, a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability

Notes		1% / 12% Step-Up Senior Secured Third Lien Convertible Notes due 2030, represented by units of Stapled Securities

Issue Date		February 10, 2016

Maturity Date		The Notes will mature on December 31, 2030, unless redeemed, repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms.

Step-up Interest		Prior to the fourth anniversary of the Issue Date, 1% per year, payable in kind, semi-annually (in arrears) by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the Notes. From and after the fourth anniversary of the Issue Date through the Maturity Date, 12%, payable in kind, semi-annually (in arrears) by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the Notes. At final maturity, all accrued and unpaid interest will be paid together with principal in cash.

Minimum Denominations		The Notes were issued in minimum principal denominations of $1.00 and integral multiplies of $0.01 in excess thereof.

Guarantees		The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior secured third lien basis by each of the Company’s existing and future subsidiaries who also guarantee the Credit Agreement (the “Guarantors”). See “Description of the Notes—Note Guarantees.”

Security		The Notes and the guarantees thereof are secured by a third priority lien, junior to the liens securing the Company’s and the Guarantors’ obligations under the Credit Agreement and the Company’s Senior Secured Notes, on substantially all assets of the Company and the Guarantors, consistent with the Credit Agreement and consisting of all assets securing the Credit Agreement.

Ranking		The Notes and the guarantees of each Guarantor: • are the Company’s and the Guarantors’ senior secured obligations, as applicable; • are subordinated in right of payment to the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes subject to the provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement; • rank equal in right of payment with all of the Company’s and the Guarantors’ other existing and future senior indebtedness, as applicable; • rank senior in right of payment to any of the Company’s or the Guarantors’, as applicable, future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes; • are effectively senior to any of the Company’s and the Guarantors’ unsecured indebtedness, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing the Notes and the guarantees thereof; and • are effectively junior to all of the Company’s and the Guarantors’ existing and future first-priority and second-priority senior secured indebtedness (including, for the avoidance of doubt, the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes), to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness.



Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement		The obligations of the Company and the Guarantors under the indenture governing the Notes (the “Indenture”) are secured on a third-priority subordinated basis. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, U.S. Bank National Association, as Third Lien Representative and Noteholder Collateral Agent, entered into a third lien intercreditor agreement (the “Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement”). The Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement governs the relative rights, duties, authority and responsibilities of the First Lien Collateral Agent, the Second Lien Collateral Agent and the Noteholder Collateral Agent, and the relationship among the First Lien Claimholders, Second Lien Claimholders and Third Lien Claimholders with respect to their interests in the Collateral (each as defined below). See “Description of the Notes—Security—Intercreditor Agreements.”

Notes Stapled		The Notes are “stapled” to the Ordinary Shares and issuable in Units of Stapled Securities, each initially comprising one Ordinary Share and an original issue amount of $172.61 principal amount of Notes (in each case subject to adjustment as described further herein), such that the Notes and associated Ordinary Shares constituting the component parts of the Stapled Securities may not be separated and may only be traded together as single Stapled Securities.

Additional Amounts		All payments made on behalf of the Company or any Guarantor under or with respect to the Notes or the guarantees thereof will be made free and clear of and without withholding or deduction for, or on account of, any present or future taxes in any relevant taxing jurisdiction unless required by law. If withholding or deduction for such jurisdiction is required to be made with respect to a payment to the holders of the Notes or under any guarantees thereof, the Company or the Guarantors will be required to pay such additional amounts (“Additional Amounts”) as may be necessary so that the net amount received by each holder of Notes (including Additional Amounts) after such withholding or deduction will not be less than the amount such holder would have received if such taxes had not been withheld or deducted, subject to certain exceptions. See “Description of the Notes—Withholding Taxes.”

Conversion		The then outstanding principal amount of Notes, including any interest previously paid by increasing such principal amount, may be converted into Ordinary Shares at the Conversion Price then in effect: (a) prior to the third anniversary of the Issue Date, (i) upon the instruction of holders of a majority in principal amount of the Notes to convert into Ordinary Shares, or (ii) upon the full and final resolution of all potential Investigation Claims (as defined below) against the Company, the Company’s Subsidiaries as of the Issue Date, Vantage International Management Company Pte. Ltd., Vantage Energy Services, Inc. and Vantage Parent (as defined below) and Vantage Parent’s subsidiaries as of the Issue Date (to the extent that the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company may reasonably be expected to be liable for such claim against Vantage Parent or Vantage Parent’s subsidiaries as of the Issue Date), as determined in good faith by the board of directors of the Company (which determination shall require the affirmative vote of a supermajority of the non-management directors), and



		(b) from and after the third anniversary of the Issue Date through the Maturity Date, upon the approval of the board of directors of the Company (which approval shall require the affirmative vote of a supermajority of the non-management directors). For purposes of the above, a supermajority of the non-management directors means five affirmative votes of non-management directors assuming six non-management directors are eligible to vote, and in all other circumstances, the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the non-management directors eligible to vote. The initial Conversion Price is initially equal to $95.60/ Ordinary Share (the “Conversion Price”). The Notes, if not converted in full, may only be converted, at any time or from time to time, if a minimum of $125 million aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding Notes is so converted.

		The Conversion Price will be subject to adjustment in certain circumstances described under “Description of the Notes—Conversion Rights—Conversion Rate Adjustment.”

Optional Redemption		Subject to the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement, the Notes may be redeemed, at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed plus the Applicable Premium as of, and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, the applicable redemption date. See “Description of the Notes—Redemption and Offer to Purchase—Optional Redemption.”

Mandatory Redemption Upon Loss of a Vessel		Subject to the terms of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, upon the occurrence or happening of certain events of loss with respect to the Company’s fleet, the Company shall be required to redeem Notes and such other pari passu indebtedness containing provisions similar to those set forth in the Indenture with respect to a redemption upon events of loss, in an amount equal to the maximum principal amount of Notes and such other pari passu Indebtedness that may be purchased out of the proceeds received in respect of such loss at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes redeemed to the applicable redemption date. See “Description of the Notes—Redemption and Offer to Purchase—Mandatory Redemption Upon Loss of a Vessel.”

Redemption upon a Change in Tax Law		Under certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions, the Company will have the option to redeem the Notes, in whole but not in part, at any time, at a redemption price of 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest and applicable Additional Amounts, if any, to the date of redemption, if the Company or the Guarantors, as the case may be, have become or would become obligated to pay Additional Amounts as a result of the imposition of withholding taxes on the Notes as a result of a change in the laws of any jurisdiction in which the Company or any Guarantor is organized, doing business or otherwise considered by a taxing authority to be a resident for tax purposes or from or through which the Company or any Guarantor makes a payment (or a payment is made on their behalf) on the Notes or any guarantee, provided that the amount of such Additional Amounts per year is in excess of 0.50% of the aggregate principal amount of Notes then outstanding. See “Description of the Notes—Redemption and Offer to Purchase—Optional Redemption for Changes in Withholding Taxes.”



Change of Control Offer		Subject to the terms of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, if the Company experiences a Change of Control (as defined below), each holder of the Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or any part of its Notes (in accordance with the terms of the Indenture) at a price in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase. See “Description of the Notes—Redemption and Offer to Purchase—Change of Control.”

Asset Sale Offer		Subject to the terms of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, if the Company or any Restricted Subsidiary makes certain sales of assets, any net proceeds from such asset sale not applied, or committed to be applied, within 360 days in accordance with the requirements of the covenant described in “Description of the Notes—Asset Sales” in excess of $10 million shall be applied to make an offer to all holders of Notes and all holders of other pari passu indebtedness containing provisions similar to those set forth in the Indenture with respect to offers to purchase or redeem with the proceeds of sales of assets to purchase the maximum principal amount of Notes and such other pari passu indebtedness that may be purchased out of such proceeds. The offer price in any such offer will be equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase, and will be payable in cash.

Use of Proceeds		We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of Stapled Securities offered by the selling holders.

Certain Covenants		The Indenture, among other things, limits the Company’s and any Restricted Subsidiaries’ ability: • create or incur liens; • consummate a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of their assets; • engage in business other than their current business and reasonably related extensions thereof; and • make certain vessel transfers or partial vessel sales. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications. See “Description of the Notes—Certain Covenants.”

Summary of the Ordinary Shares

The following summary contains basic information about the Ordinary Shares and is not intended to be complete. It does not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of the Ordinary Shares, please refer the section of the Prospectus entitled “Description of Share Capital.”


Issuer		Vantage Drilling International, a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability

Ordinary Shares outstanding		5,000,053 Ordinary Shares

Voting Rights		Each holder will have one vote per Ordinary Share held.

Listing		Our Ordinary Shares will not be listed on any national exchange.

Use of Proceeds		We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of Ordinary Shares offered by the selling holders.

Dividend Policy		We have not paid any dividends on our Ordinary Shares to date, and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the immediate future. See “Market Prices and Dividend Policy.”

Unless we specifically state otherwise, all information in this prospectus is based on 4,344,959 units of Stapled Securities and 5,000,053 shares of Ordinary Shares outstanding as of August 15, 2016.

You should carefully consider the risks described under “Risk Factors” before making any investment decision.

SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents the Company’s summary historical financial information as of and for the periods presented.

As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, as well as the effects of the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization, the consolidated financial statements on and after February 10, 2016 are not comparable with the consolidated financial statements prior to that date. See Note 2 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

The summary historical financial information as of June 30, 2016 (successor) and for the successor period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016, the predecessor periods from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical financial information as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary historical financial information as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 has been derived from the Company’s consolidated financial statements, not included elsewhere in this prospectus.


	Successor			Predecessor
	Period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016			Period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016			Six months ended June 30, 2015
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
Revenue	$	78,297		$	23,540		$	434,904
Operating costs		62,404			25,213			190,059
General and administrative		17,863			2,558			12,691
Depreciation		30,457			10,696			63,404

Income (loss) from operations		(32,427	)		(14,927	)		168,750
Interest income		15			3			25
Interest expense and other financing charges		(29,422	)		(1,728	)(1)		(92,027	)
Gain on debt extinguishment		—			—			10,823
Other, net		318			(69	)		1,820
Reorganization items		(641	)		(452,923	)		—

Income (loss) before income taxes		(62,157	)		(469,644	)		89,391
Income tax provision		2,605			2,371			38,151

Net income (loss)		(64,762	)		(472,015	)		51,240
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			(969	)		667

Net income (loss) attributable to VDI	$	(64,762	)	$	(471,046	)	$	50,573

(1)	Contractual interest of $23,219 for the period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016.


	Successor
	June 30, 2016
	(unaudited) (in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents	$	240,502
Total other current assets		92,648
Property and equipment, net		868,038
Total other assets		10,815
Total assets		1,212,003
Total current liabilities		51,688
Long–term debt, net of discount of $127,974		839,831
Other long-term liabilities		11,269
Total VDI shareholder’s equity		309,215
Total liabilities and equity		1,212,003


	Successor			Predecessor
	Period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016			Period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016			Six months ended June 30, 2015
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Cash Flow Data
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	204		$	(21,365	)	$	24,659
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(7,982	)		116			(17,017	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(766	)		66,875			(54,605	)


	As of and For the Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013			2012			2011
										(unaudited)
	(In thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
Revenue	$	772,265		$	882,904		$	728,256		$	459,743		$	425,420
Operating costs		359,610			405,697			324,767			211,651			222,485
General and administrative expenses		25,322			25,390			22,714			19,425			12,346
Depreciation and amortization		127,359			126,610			106,609			68,747			64,477

Income from operations		259,974			325,207			274,166			159,920			126,112
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment		10,823	(1)		4,408	(2)		(98,327	)(3)		(122,071	)(4)		(25,196	)(5)
Interest expense		(173,550	)(6)		(196,089	)		(198,545	)		(139,565	)		(147,260	)
Other income (expense)		4,231			(596	)		3,010			635			1,131
Reorganization items		(39,354	)(7)		—			—			—			—

Income (loss) before income taxes		62,124			132,930			(19,696	)		(101,081	)		(45,213	)
Income tax provision		39,870			39,817			27,921			18,904			10,626

Net income (loss)		22,254			93,113			(47,617	)		(119,985	)		(55,839	)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		5,036			257			(463	)		(3,343	)		(1,514	)

Net income (loss) attributable to VDI	$	17,218		$	92,856		$	(47,154	)	$	(116,642	)	$	(54,325	)

Other Financial Data
EBITDA Reconciliation
Net income (loss)	$	22,254		$	93,113		$	(47,617	)	$	(119,985	)	$	(55,839	)
Interest expense		173,550			196,089			198,545			139,565			147,260
Income tax provision		39,870			39,817			27,921			18,904			10,626
Depreciation		127,359			126,610			106,609			68,747			64,477

EBITDA (8)		363,033			455,629			285,458			107,231			166,524
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment		(10,823	)		(4,408	)		98,327			122,071			25,196
Reorganization items		39,354			—			—			—			—

Adjusted EBITDA (9)	$	391,564		$	451,221		$	383,785		$	229,302		$	191,720

Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents	$	203,420		$	75,801		$	50,326		$	487,232		$	94,996
Total other current assets		157,323			243,411			243,186			182,869			114,189
Property and equipment, net		2,948,387			3,032,568			3,126,598			2,717,506			1,804,988
Total other assets		23,050			72,091			89,773			81,495			62,060

Total assets	$	3,332,180		$	3,423,871		$	3,509,883		$	3,469,102		$	2,076,233

Total current liabilities		132,616			341,380			389,070			344,920			256,622
Long-term debt		—	(10)		2,497,103			2,669,705			2,622,686			1,212,497
Other long-term liabilities		33,097			83,982			41,820			44,371			29,755
Liabilities subject to compromise		2,694,456			—			—			—			—
VDI shareholder’s equity		456,756			490,689			397,833			444,987			561,627
Noncontrolling interests		15,255			10,717			11,455			12,138			15,732

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,332,180		$	3,423,871		$	3,509,883		$	3,469,102		$	2,076,233

Cash Flow Data
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	92,587		$	239,724		$	18,876		$	(133,844	)	$	92,976
Net cash used in investing activities		(46,490	)		(35,693	)		(523,759	)		(874,117	)		(140,946	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		81,522			(178,556	)		67,977			1,400,198			118,051

(1)	Includes redemption discounts totaling $11.5 million in connection with discretionary open market repurchases of our pre-bankruptcy indebtedness offset by $0.7 million for the write-off of associated issuance discounts and deferred financing costs.

(2)	Includes redemption discounts totaling $7.1 million in connection with discretionary open market repurchases of our pre-bankruptcy indebtedness offset by $2.7 million for the write-off of associated issuance discounts and deferred financing costs.

(3)	Includes $92.3 million in prepayment and consent fees and $24.0 million for the write-off of deferred financing costs offset by $18.0 million of issuance premium associated with the early retirement of $1 billion of our pre-bankruptcy 11.5% Senior Notes due 2015 (“11.5% Senior Notes”).

(4)	Includes $115.0 million for consent fees and $28.2 million for the write-off of deferred financing costs offset by $21.1 million of issuance premium associated with the early retirement of $1 billion of pre-bankruptcy 11.5% Senior Notes.

(5)	Includes $21.7 million in prepayment fees and approximately $3.5 million for the write-off of deferred financing costs associated with the early retirement of the debt for the acquisition of the Aquamarine Driller.

(6)	Contractual interest of $178,049 during the year ended December 31, 2015.

(7)	Includes the write-off of $31.4 million of deferred finance charges and $5.7 million of debt discount and $2.2 million of post-petition professional fees incurred in connection with our bankruptcy proceedings.

(8)

Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) represents net income (loss) before (i) interest expense, (ii) provision for income taxes and (iii) depreciation and amortization expense. EBITDA is not a financial measure under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as defined under the rules of the SEC, and is intended as a supplemental measure of our performance. We believe this measure is commonly used by analysts and investors to analyze and compare companies on the basis of operating performance.

(9)

Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted to exclude (gain) on debt extinguishment and reorganization items. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure as defined under the rules of the SEC, and is intended as a supplemental measure of our performance. We believe this measure is commonly used by analysts and investors to analyze and compare companies on the basis of operating performance.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not a substitute for GAAP measures of net income, operating income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities or other liquidity measures derived in accordance with GAAP.

(10)	$2.7 billion of long-term debt was classified as Liabilities Subject to Compromise as of December 31, 2015.

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. In such a case, you may lose all or a part of your original investment.

Risks Related to Our Company’s Business

Our industry is highly competitive, cyclical and subject to intense price competition.

The offshore contract drilling industry, historically, has been very cyclical with periods of high demand, limited supply and high dayrates alternating with periods of low demand, excess supply and low dayrates. Many offshore drilling units are highly mobile. Competitors may move drilling units from region to region in response to changes in demand. According to industry sources, 48 jackup rigs and 13 deepwater rigs are scheduled for delivery from the shipyard through the remainder of 2016. While we do not anticipate that all of these rigs will be delivered, this excess supply of rigs is depressing the markets in which we operate. Periods of low demand and excess supply intensify competition in the industry and often result in some drilling units becoming idle for long periods of time. Prolonged periods of low utilization and dayrates, or extended idle time, could result in the recognition of impairment charges on our drilling units if cash flow estimates, based upon information available to management at the time, indicate that the carrying value of the drilling units may not be recoverable.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.

Following the completion of the Plan of Reorganization on February 10, 2016, we had approximately $969.1 million aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding, consisting of $143.0 million under the Credit Agreement, $76.1 million of our Senior Secured Notes and approximately $750.0 million of our Notes. Subject to the restrictions in our Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our Senior Secured Notes and our Notes, we may incur additional indebtedness. Our high level of indebtedness could have important consequences for an investment in us and significant effects on our business. For example, our level of indebtedness and the terms of our debt agreements may:

•

make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations under our indebtedness and our contractual and commercial commitments and increase the risk that we may default on our debt obligations;

•

prevent us from raising the funds necessary to repurchase notes tendered to us if there is a change of control or other repayment event under the instruments governing our indebtedness, which would constitute a default under the indenture governing the notes;

•

require us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to pay interest and principal on the notes and other debt, which would reduce the funds available for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

•

limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other investments, or general corporate purposes, which may limit our ability to execute our business strategy;

•

limit our ability to refinance our indebtedness on terms that are commercially reasonable, or at all;

•

heighten our vulnerability to downturns in our business, our industry or in the general economy and restrict us from exploiting business opportunities or making acquisitions;

•

place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to those of our competitors that may have proportionately less debt;

•

limit management’s discretion in operating our business;

•

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business, the industry in which we operate or the general economy; and

•

result in higher interest expense if interest rates increase and we have outstanding floating rate borrowings.

Each of these factors may have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and viability. Our ability to satisfy our other debt obligations will depend on our future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors affecting our company and industry, many of which are beyond our control.

Additionally, each of the agreements governing the Credit Agreement, the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes is subject to terms, conditions and covenants, a violation of which would constitute an event of default and could result in the acceleration of the maturity of the obligations. Compliance with certain of these covenants may be beyond our control and we cannot assure you that we will satisfy those requirements. In the event (A) the Company, any guarantor, or any restricted subsidiary that is a significant subsidiary or a group of subsidiaries that, taken together would constitute a significant subsidiary, within the meaning of bankruptcy law (i) commences a voluntary case, (ii) consents to the entry of an order for relief against it in an involuntary case, (iii) consents to the appointment of a custodian of it or for all or substantially all of its property (iv) makes a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors or (v) is generally not paying its debts as they come due, or (B) if a court of competent jurisdiction enters an order or decree under any bankruptcy law that is for relief in an involuntary case, appoints a custodian, or orders the liquidation of the Company, any guarantor, or any restricted subsidiary that is a significant subsidiary or a group of subsidiaries that, taken together would constitute a significant subsidiary (and the order or decree remains unstayed and in effect for 60 consecutive days), the secured debt obligations will automatically accelerate with no further action or notice by the debt holders.

If any other event of default under the terms of the Senior Secured Notes or Notes, the trustee or holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding secured debt may declare the obligation due and payable. If there is any other event of default under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Administrative Agent may declare the obligations under the Credit Agreement immediately due and payable. An event of default or acceleration of any of the secured debt obligations will likely cross default and accelerate the other secured debt obligations.

In the event the Notes accelerate, the holders are entitled to the outstanding principal, accrued interest and a premium. The Applicable Premium is calculated as the greater of (i) 1% of the then outstanding principal amount and (ii) the difference between the present value, computed using a discount rate equal to the treasury rate plus 50 basis points, of the accreted value at maturity, less the outstanding principal of the Notes. The estimated Applicable Premium is in excess of $1.0 billion.

If the amounts outstanding in respect of our Credit Agreement, Senior Secured Notes and the Notes or any other indebtedness outstanding at such time were to be accelerated or were the subject of foreclosure actions, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full the money owed to the lenders or to our other debt holders.

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our policies mandate compliance with these laws. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our extensive training and compliance program, we cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will always protect us from improper acts committed by our directors, employees or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our business and operations. We may be subject to competitive disadvantages to the extent that our competitors are able to secure business, licenses or other preferential treatment by making payments to government officials and others in positions of influence or using other methods that U.S. laws and regulations prohibit us from using.

In order to effectively compete in some foreign jurisdictions, we utilize local agents and seek to establish joint ventures with local operators or strategic partners. Although we have procedures and controls in place to monitor internal and external compliance, if we are found to be liable for FCPA violations (either due to our own acts or omissions, or due to the acts or omissions of others, including actions taken by our agents and our strategic or local partners, even though our agents and partners may not be subject to the FCPA), we could suffer from civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In July 2015, we became aware of media reports that Hamylton Padilha, the Brazilian agent for the Company used in the contracting of the Titanium Explorer drillship to Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”), had entered into a plea arrangement with the Brazilian authorities in connection with his role in facilitating the payment of bribes to former Petrobras executives. Among other things, Mr. Padilha provided information to the Brazilian authorities of an alleged bribery scheme between former Petrobras executives and Mr. Hsin-Chi Su, who was, at the time of the alleged bribery scheme, a member of the Board of Directors and a significant shareholder of our predecessor company, Vantage Drilling Company. When we learned of Mr. Padilha’s plea agreement and the allegations, we voluntarily contacted the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”)and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to advise them of these recent developments, as well as the fact that we had engaged outside counsel to conduct an internal investigation of the allegations. Our internal investigation is ongoing and we are cooperating with the DOJ and SEC in their investigation of these allegations. In connection with our cooperation with the DOJ and SEC, we recently advised both agencies that in early 2010, we engaged outside counsel to investigate a report of allegations of improper payments to customs and immigration officials in Asia. That investigation was concluded in 2011, and we determined at that time that no disclosure was warranted; however, in an abundance of caution, we are reviewing the matter again in light of the allegations in the Petrobras matter. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, if the DOJ or the SEC determine that violations of the FCPA have occurred, the Company could be subject to civil and criminal sanctions, including monetary penalties, as well as additional requirements or changes to our business practices and compliance programs, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Additionally, if we become subject to any judgment, decree, order, governmental penalty or fine, this may constitute an event of default under the terms of our secured debt agreements and result in our outstanding debt becoming immediately due and payable.

A continued reduction in expenditures by oil and natural gas exploration and production companies due to the current low level of oil and natural gas prices, a decrease in demand for oil and natural gas, or other factors, would adversely affect our business.

Our business, including the utilization rates and dayrates we achieve for our drilling units, depends on the level of activity in oil and natural gas exploration, development and production expenditures of our customers. Oil and natural gas prices and customers’ expectations of potential changes in these prices significantly affect this level of activity. Commodity prices are affected by numerous factors, including the following:

•

changes in global economic conditions;

•

the worldwide supply and demand for oil and natural gas;

•

the cost of exploring for, producing and delivering oil and natural gas;

•

expectations regarding future prices;

•

advances in exploration, development and production technology;

•

the ability or willingness of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to set and maintain production levels and pricing;

•

the availability and discovery rate of new oil and natural gas reserves in offshore areas;

•

the rate of decline of existing and new oil and natural gas reserves;

•

the level of production in non-OPEC countries;

•

domestic and international tax policies;

•

the development and exploitation of alternative fuels;

•

weather;

•

blowouts and other catastrophic events;

•

governmental laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations;

•

the policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of their oil and natural gas reserves;

•

volatility in the exchange rate of the U.S. dollar against other currencies; and

•

the worldwide political environment, uncertainty or instability resulting from an escalation or additional outbreak of armed hostilities or other crises in significant oil and natural gas producing regions or further acts of terrorism.

In addition to oil and gas prices, the offshore drilling industry is influenced by additional factors, including:

•

the availability of competing offshore drilling vessels and the level of construction activity for new drilling vessels;

•

the level of costs for associated offshore oilfield and construction services;

•

oil and gas transportation costs;

•

the discovery of new oil and gas reserves;

•

the cost of non-conventional hydrocarbons; and

•

regulatory restrictions on offshore drilling.

Any of these factors could reduce demand for or prices paid for our services and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Low prices for oil and natural gas may reduce demand for our services and could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability.

Demand for our services depends on oil and natural gas industry activity and expenditure levels that are directly affected by trends in oil and natural gas prices. In addition, demand for our services is particularly sensitive to the level of exploration, development and production activity of and the corresponding capital spending by, oil and natural gas companies. Any prolonged weakness in oil and natural gas prices could depress the near-term levels of exploration, development, and production activity. Perceptions of longer-term lower oil and natural gas prices by oil and natural gas companies could similarly reduce or defer major expenditures given the long- term nature of many large-scale development projects. Lower levels of activity result in a corresponding decline in the demand for our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. Additionally, these factors may adversely impact our financial position if they are determined to cause an impairment of our long- lived assets.

A small number of customers account for a significant portion of our revenues, and the loss of one or more of these customers could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. The concentration of revenue with a small number of customers also exposes us to credit risk of these customers for non-payment or contract termination.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from a few customers. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, three customers accounted for approximately 32%, 25% and 20%, of our revenue. Three customers accounted for approximately 47%, 20% and 17% of consolidated revenue for the period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016. Three customers accounted for approximately 50%, 19% and 18% of consolidated revenue for the period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016. Our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if any one of these customers interrupts or curtails their activities, fails to

pay for the services that have been performed, terminates their contracts, fails to renew their existing contracts or refuse to award new contracts and we are unable to enter into contracts with new customers on comparable terms. The loss of any of our significant customers could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our jackup drilling contracts are generally short-term, and we could experience reduced profitability if customers reduce activity levels, terminate or seek to renegotiate drilling contracts with us, or if market conditions dictate that we enter into contracts that provide for payment based on a footage or turnkey basis, rather than on a dayrate basis.

Many jackup drilling contracts are short-term, and oil and natural gas companies tend to reduce shallow water activity levels quickly in response to downward changes in oil and natural gas prices. Due to the short-term nature of most of our jackup drilling contracts, a decline in market conditions can quickly affect our business if customers reduce their levels of operations. During depressed market conditions, a customer may no longer need a unit that is currently under contract or may be able to obtain a comparable unit at a lower dayrate. As a result, customers may seek to renegotiate the terms of their existing drilling contracts or avoid their obligations under those contracts. In addition, our customers may have the right to terminate, or may seek to renegotiate, existing contracts if we experience excessive downtime, operational problems above the contractual limit or safety-related issues, if the drilling unit is a total loss, if the drilling unit is not delivered to the customer within the period specified in the contract or in other specified circumstances, which include events beyond the control of either party.

Some of our current jackup drilling contracts, and some drilling contracts that we may enter into in the future, may include terms allowing customers to terminate contracts without cause, with little or no prior notice and without penalty or early termination payments. In addition, we could be required to pay penalties, which could be material, if some of these contracts are terminated due to downtime, operational problems or failure to deliver. Some of the contracts with customers that we enter into in the future may be cancellable at the option of the customer upon payment of a penalty, which may not fully compensate us for the loss of the contract. Early termination of a contract may result in a drilling unit being idle for an extended period of time. The likelihood that a customer may seek to terminate a contract is increased during periods of market weakness. Under most of our contracts, it is an event of default if we file a petition for bankruptcy or reorganization, which would allow the customer to terminate such contract.

Currently, all of our jackup drilling contracts are dayrate contracts, where we charge a fixed rate per day regardless of the number of days needed to drill the well. While we plan to continue to perform services on a dayrate basis, market conditions may dictate that we enter into contracts that provide for payment based on a footage basis, where we are paid a fixed amount for each foot drilled regardless of the time required or the problems encountered in drilling the well, or enter into turnkey contracts, where we agree to drill a well to a specific depth for a fixed price and bear some of the well equipment costs. These types of contracts are riskier for us than a dayrate contract as we would be subject to downhole geologic conditions in the well that cannot always be accurately determined and subject us to greater risks associated with equipment and downhole tool failures. Unfavorable downhole geologic conditions and equipment and downhole tool failures may result in significant cost increases or may result in a decision to abandon a well project which would result in us not being able to invoice revenues for providing services. Any such termination or renegotiation of contracts and unfavorable costs increases or loss of revenue could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to replace expiring contracts for our existing rigs at dayrates that are economically feasible for us.

Due to the cyclical nature and high level of competition in our industry, we may not be able to replace expiring contracts. Our ability to replace expiring contracts will depend on prevailing market conditions, the specific needs of our customers, and numerous other factors beyond our control. Additionally, any contracts for our drilling units may be at dayrates that are below, or substantially below, existing dayrates, which could have a material adverse effect on our overall business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

The agreements governing our Credit Agreement, Senior Secured Notes and Notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us and our subsidiaries that may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and restrict our ability to operate our business.

The agreements governing our Credit Agreement, Senior Secured Notes and Notes contain covenants that restrict our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to take various actions, such as:

•

paying dividends, redeeming subordinated indebtedness or making other restricted payments;

•

incurring or guaranteeing additional indebtedness or, with respect to our restricted subsidiaries or any other subsidiary guarantor, issuing preferred shares;

•

creating or incurring liens;

•

incurring dividend or other payment restrictions affecting our restricted subsidiaries;

•

consummating a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our or our subsidiaries’ assets;

•

entering into transactions with affiliates;

•

transferring or selling assets, including to a master limited partnership or similar entity;

•

engaging in business other than our current business and reasonably related extensions thereof;

•

issuing capital stock of certain subsidiaries;

•

taking or omitting to take any actions that would adversely affect or impair in any material respect the collateral securing our indebtedness;

•

terminating or amending certain material contracts;

•

amending, modifying or changing our organizational documents; and

•

employing our drilling units in certain jurisdictions.

We may also be prevented from taking advantage of business opportunities because of the limitations imposed on us by the restrictive covenants under the indentures governing the Credit Agreement, the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes. In addition, the restrictions contained may also limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions, meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans and adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, enter into acquisitions, execute our business strategy, effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted or engage in other business activities that would be in our interest. We are also subject to additional restrictions in our term loan agreements and revolving credit agreement, and in the future, we may also incur additional debt obligations that might subject us to additional and different restrictive covenants that could further affect our financial and operational flexibility. We cannot assure you that we will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if for any reason we are unable to comply with these agreements, or that we will be able to refinance our debt on acceptable terms or at all.

Our business is affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions and the condition of the oil and natural gas industry.

Current economic conditions have resulted in uncertainty regarding energy and commodity prices. In addition, future economic conditions may cause many oil and natural gas production companies to further reduce or delay expenditures in order to reduce costs, which in turn may cause a further reduction in the demand for drilling services. If conditions worsen, our business and financial condition may be adversely impacted.

There may be limits to our ability to mobilize drilling units between geographic markets and the time and costs of such drilling unit mobilizations may be material to our business.

The offshore contract drilling market is generally a global market as drilling units may be mobilized from one market to another market. However, geographic markets can, from time to time, have material fluctuations in costs and risks as the ability to mobilize drilling units can be impacted by several factors including, but not limited to, governmental regulation and customs practices, the significant costs to move a drilling unit, availability of tow boats or heavy lift vessels, weather, political instability, civil unrest, military actions, and the technical capability of the drilling units to operate in various environments. Any increase in the supply of drilling units in the geographic areas in which we operate, whether through new construction, refurbishment or conversion of drilling units from other uses, remobilization or changes in the law or its application, could increase competition and result in lower dayrates and/or utilization, which would adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, while a drilling unit is being mobilized from one geographic market to another, we may not be paid by the customer for the time that the drilling unit is out of service. Also, we may mobilize the drilling unit to another geographic market without a customer contract which will result in costs not reimbursable by future customers.

Our business involves numerous operating hazards, and our insurance and contractual indemnity rights may not be adequate to cover our losses.

Our operations are subject to the usual hazards inherent in the drilling and operation of oil and natural gas wells, such as blowouts, reservoir damage, loss of production, loss of well control, punch-throughs, craterings, fires and pollution. The occurrence of these events could result in the suspension of drilling or production operations, claims by the operator and others affected by such events, severe damage to, or destruction of, the property and equipment involved, injury or death to drilling unit personnel, environmental damage and increased insurance costs. We may also be subject to personal injury and other claims of drilling unit personnel as a result of our drilling operations. Operations also may be suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal operating conditions, failure of subcontractors to perform or supply goods or services and personnel shortages.

In addition, our operations will be subject to perils particular to marine operations, including capsizing, grounding, collision and loss or damage from severe weather. Severe weather could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Our drilling units could be damaged by high winds, turbulent seas, or unstable sea bottom conditions which could potentially cause us to curtail operations for significant periods of time until such damages are repaired.

Damage to the environment could result from our operations, particularly through oil spillage or extensive uncontrolled fires. We may also be subject to property, environmental and other damage claims by host governments, oil and natural gas companies and other businesses operating offshore and in coastal areas, as well as claims by individuals living in or around coastal areas.

As is customary in our industry, the risks of our operations are partially covered by our insurance and partially by contractual indemnities from our customers. However, insurance policies and contractual rights to indemnity may not adequately cover losses, and we may not have insurance coverage or rights to indemnity for all risks. Moreover, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. If a significant accident or other event resulting in damage to our drilling units, including severe weather, terrorist acts, war, civil disturbances, pollution or environmental damage, occurs and is not fully covered by insurance or a recoverable indemnity from a customer, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our offshore drilling operations could be adversely impacted by changes in regulation of offshore oil and gas exploration and development activity.

Offshore drilling operations in the United States and elsewhere could be adversely impacted by changes in regulation of offshore oil and gas exploration and development activities. Significant new requirements with respect to development and production activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico have been imposed in recent years. These new requirements generally relate to the design of wells and testing of the integrity of wellbores, the use of drilling fluids, the functionality and testing of well control equipment, including blowout preventers, and other environmental and safety matters.

Customers may be unable or unwilling to indemnify us.

Consistent with standard industry practice, our customers generally assume liability for and indemnify us against well control and subsurface risks under our dayrate contracts, and we do not separately purchase insurance for such indemnified risks. These risks are those associated with the loss of control of a well, such as blowout or cratering, the cost to regain control or redrill the well and associated pollution. In the future, we may not be able to obtain agreements from customers to indemnify us for such damages and risks or the indemnities that we do obtain may be limited in scope and duration. Additionally, even if our customers agree to indemnify us, there can be no assurance that they will necessarily be financially able to indemnify us against all of these risks.

Our insurance coverage may not be adequate if a catastrophic event occurs.

As a result of the number and significance of catastrophic events in the history of the offshore drilling industry, such as hurricanes and spills in the Gulf of Mexico, insurance underwriters have increased insurance premiums and increased restrictions on coverage and have made other coverages, such as Gulf of Mexico windstorm coverage, unavailable to us on commercially reasonable terms.

While we believe we have reasonable policy limits of property, casualty, liability, and business interruption insurance, including coverage for acts of terrorism, with financially sound insurers, we cannot guarantee that our policy limits for property, casualty, liability, and business interruption insurance, including coverage for severe weather, terrorist acts, war, civil disturbances, pollution or environmental damage, would be adequate should a catastrophic event occur related to our property, plant or equipment, or that our insurers would have adequate financial resources to sufficiently or fully pay related claims or damages. When any of our coverage expires, or when we seek coverage in the future, we cannot guarantee that adequate coverage will be available, offered at reasonable prices, or offered by insurers with sufficient financial soundness. Additionally, we do not have third party windstorm insurance and we may not have windstorm insurance for any vessel that we operate in the Gulf of Mexico in the future. The occurrence of an incident or incidents affecting any one or more of our drilling units could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and future results of operations if asset damage and/or our liability were to exceed insurance coverage limits or if an insurer was unable to sufficiently or fully pay related claims or damages.

Our international operations are subject to additional political, economic, legal and other uncertainties not generally associated with domestic operations.

A primary component of our business strategy is to operate in international oil and natural gas producing areas. Our international operations are subject to a number of risks inherent in any business operating in foreign countries, including:

•

political, social and economic instability, war and acts of terrorism;

•

government corruption;

•

potential seizure, expropriation or nationalization of assets;

•

damage to our equipment or violence directed at our employees, including kidnappings;

•

piracy;

•

increased operating costs;

•

complications associated with repairing and replacing equipment in remote locations;

•

repudiation, modification or renegotiation of contracts;

•

limitations on insurance coverage, such as war risk coverage in certain areas;

•

import-export quotas;

•

confiscatory taxation;

•

claims under foreign labor or employment laws;

•

work stoppages;

•

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

•

wage and price controls;

•

imposition of trade barriers;

•

imposition or changes in enforcement of local content laws;

•

restrictions on currency or capital repatriations;

•

currency fluctuations and devaluations; and

•

other forms of government regulation and economic conditions that are beyond our control.

Our financial condition and results of operations could be susceptible to adverse events beyond our control that may occur in the particular countries or regions in which we are active. Additionally, we may experience currency exchange losses where, at some future date, revenues are received and expenses are paid in nonconvertible currencies or where we do not hedge exposure to a foreign currency. We may also incur losses as a result of an inability to collect revenues because of a shortage of convertible currency available in the country of operation, controls over currency exchange or controls over the repatriation of income or capital.

Many governments favor or effectively require that drilling contracts be awarded to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. These practices may result in inefficiencies or put us at a disadvantage when bidding for contracts against local competitors.

Our offshore contract drilling operations are subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which we operate, including laws and regulations relating to the equipment and operation of drilling units, currency conversions and repatriation, oil and natural gas exploration and development, taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel, the use of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors and duties on the importation and exportation of drilling units and other equipment. Governments in some foreign countries have become increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership of concessions and companies holding concessions, the exploration for oil and natural gas and other aspects of the oil and natural gas industries in their countries. In some areas of the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the amount of exploration and development work done by major oil and natural gas companies and may continue to do so. Operations in less developed countries can be subject to legal systems which are not as predictable as those in more developed countries, which can lead to greater uncertainty in legal matters and proceedings.

Our business is subject to numerous governmental laws and regulations, including those that may impose significant costs and liability on us for environmental and natural resource damages.

Many aspects of our operations are affected by governmental laws and regulations that may relate directly or indirectly to the contract drilling industry, including those requiring us to control the discharge of oil and other contaminants into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. Countries where we currently operate have environmental laws and regulations covering the discharge of oil and other contaminants and protection of the environment in connection with operations. Operations and activities in the United States and its territorial waters are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations, including the U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Oil Pollution Act (the “OPA”), the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and MARPOL. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial obligations, the denial or revocation of permits or other authorizations and the issuance of injunctions that may limit or prohibit operations.

Laws and regulations protecting the environment have become more stringent in recent years and may in certain circumstances impose strict liability, rendering us liable for environmental and natural resource damages without regard to negligence or fault on our part. These laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the conduct of,

or conditions caused by, others or for acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time the acts were performed. The application of these requirements, the modification of existing laws or regulations or the adoption of new laws or regulations relating to exploratory or development drilling for oil and natural gas could materially limit future contract drilling opportunities or materially increase our costs. In addition, we may be required to make significant capital expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations.

In addition some financial institutions are imposing, as a condition to financing, requirements to comply with additional non-governmental environmental and social standards in connection with operations outside the United States, such as the Equator Principles, a credit risk management framework for determining, assessing and managing environmental and social risk in project finance transactions. Such additional standards could impose significant new costs on us, which may materially and adversely affect us.

Changes in U.S. federal laws and regulations, or in those of other jurisdictions where we operate, including those that may impose significant costs and liability on us for environmental and natural resource damages, may adversely affect our operations.

If the U.S. government amends or enacts new federal laws or regulations, our potential exposure to liability for operations and activities in the United States and its territorial waters may increase. Although the OPA provides federal caps on liability for pollution or contamination, future laws and regulations may increase our liability for pollution or contamination resulting from any operations and activities we may have in the United States and its territorial waters including punitive damages, and administrative, civil and criminal penalties. Additionally, the jurisdictions where we operate have modified or may in the future modify their laws and regulations in a manner that would increase our liability for pollution and other environmental damage.

Construction projects are subject to risks, including delays and cost overruns, which could have an adverse impact on our liquidity and results of operations.

As part of our growth strategy we may contract from time to time for the construction of drilling units or may enter into agreements to manage the construction of drilling units for others. Construction projects are subject to the risks of delay or cost overruns inherent in any large construction project, including costs or delays resulting from the following:

•

unexpected long delivery times for, or shortages of, key equipment, parts and materials;

•

shortages of skilled labor and other shipyard personnel necessary to perform the work;

•

unforeseen increases in the cost of equipment, labor and raw materials, particularly steel;

•

unforeseen design and engineering problems;

•

unanticipated actual or purported change orders;

•

work stoppages;

•

latent damages or deterioration to hull, equipment and machinery in excess of engineering estimates and assumptions;

•

failure or delay of third-party service providers and labor disputes;

•

disputes with shipyards and suppliers;

•

delays and unexpected costs of incorporating parts and materials needed for the completion of projects;

•

financial or other difficulties at shipyards;

•

adverse weather conditions; and

•

inability to obtain required permits or approvals.

If we experience delays and costs overruns in the construction of drilling units due to certain of the factors listed above, it could also adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

New technology and/or products may cause us to become less competitive.

The offshore contract drilling industry is subject to the introduction of new drilling techniques and services using new technologies, some of which may be subject to patent protection. As competitors and others use or develop new technologies, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage. Further, we may face competitive pressure to implement or acquire certain new technologies at a substantial cost. Some of our competitors have greater financial, technical and personnel resources that may allow them to access technological advantages and implement new technologies before we can. We cannot be certain that we will be able to implement new technology or products on a timely basis or at an acceptable cost. Thus, our inability to effectively use and implement new and emerging technology may have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our information technology systems and those of our service providers are subject to cybersecurity risks and threats.

We depend on information technology systems that we manage, and others that are managed by our third-party service and equipment providers, to conduct our operations, including critical systems on our drilling units, and these systems are subject to risks associated with cyber incidents or attacks. It has been reported that unknown entities or groups have mounted cyber-attacks on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. Due to the nature of cyber-attacks, breaches to our or our service or equipment providers’ systems could go unnoticed for a prolonged period of time. These cybersecurity risks could disrupt our operations and result in downtime, loss of revenue, or the loss of critical data as well as result in higher costs to correct and remedy the effects of such incidents. If our or our service or equipment providers’ systems for protecting against cyber incidents or attacks prove to be insufficient and an incident were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Currently, we do not carry insurance for losses related to cybersecurity attacks, and may elect to not obtain such insurance in the future.

Our financial condition may be adversely affected if we are unable to identify and complete future acquisitions, fail to successfully integrate acquired assets or businesses we acquire, or are unable to obtain financing for acquisitions on acceptable terms.

The acquisition of assets or businesses that we believe to be complementary to our drilling operations is an important component of our business strategy. We believe that acquisition opportunities may arise from time to time, and that any such acquisition could be significant. At any given time, discussions with one or more potential sellers may be at different stages. However, any such discussions may not result in the consummation of an acquisition transaction, and we may not be able to identify or complete any acquisitions. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that any announcement or consummation of an acquisition would have on the trading price of our securities. Our business is capital intensive and any such transactions could involve the payment by us of a substantial amount of cash. We may need to raise additional capital through public or private debt or equity financings to execute our growth strategy and to fund acquisitions. Adequate sources of capital may not be available when needed on acceptable terms. If we raise additional capital by issuing additional equity securities, existing shareholders may be diluted. If our capital resources are insufficient at any time in the future, we may be unable to fund acquisitions, take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could harm our business.

Any future acquisitions could present a number of risks, including:

•

the risk of using management time and resources to pursue acquisitions that are not successfully completed;

•

the risk of incorrect assumptions regarding the future results of acquired operations;

•

the risk of failing to integrate the operations or management of any acquired operations or assets successfully and timely; and

•

the risk of diversion of management’s attention from existing operations or other priorities.

If we are unsuccessful in completing acquisitions of other operations or assets, our financial condition could be adversely affected and we may be unable to implement an important component of our business strategy successfully. In addition, if we are unsuccessful in integrating our acquisitions in a timely and cost-effective manner, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Operating and maintenance costs will not necessarily fluctuate in proportion to changes in operating revenues.

We cannot predict what operating and maintenance costs will fluctuate in proportion to changes in operating revenues. Operating revenues may fluctuate as a function of changes in dayrates. However, costs for operating a drilling unit are generally fixed or only semi-variable regardless of the dayrate being earned. In addition, should the drilling units incur idle time between contracts, we would typically maintain the crew to prepare the drilling unit for its next contract and may not be able to reduce costs to correspond to the decrease in revenue. During times of moderate activity, reductions in costs may not be immediate as the crew may be required to prepare the drilling units for stacking, after which time the crew will be reduced to a level necessary to maintain the drilling unit in working condition with the extra crew members assigned to active drilling units or dismissed. In addition, as drilling units are mobilized from one geographic location to another, the labor and other operating and maintenance costs can vary significantly. Equipment maintenance expenses fluctuate depending upon the type of activity the drilling unit is performing and the age and condition of the equipment. Contract preparation expenses vary based on the scope and length of contract preparation required and the duration of the firm contractual period over which such expenditures are amortized.

The loss of some of our key executive officers and employees could negatively impact our business prospects.

Our future operational performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued service of key members of our management as well as marketing, sales and operations personnel. The loss of one or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business. We believe our future success will also depend in large part upon our ability to attract, retain and further motivate highly skilled management, marketing, sales and operations personnel. We may experience intense competition for personnel, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain key employees or that we will be successful in attracting, assimilating and retaining personnel in the future.

Failure to employ a sufficient number of skilled workers or an increase in labor costs could hurt our operations.

We require skilled personnel to operate and provide technical services to, and support for, our drilling units. In periods of increasing activity and when the number of operating units in our areas of operation increases, either because of new construction, re-activation of idle units or the mobilization of units into the region, shortages of qualified personnel could arise, creating upward pressure on wages and difficulty in staffing. The shortages of qualified personnel or the inability to obtain and retain qualified personnel also could negatively affect the quality and timeliness of our work. In addition, our ability to expand operations depends in part upon our ability to increase the size of the skilled labor force.

Consolidation of suppliers may increase the cost of obtaining supplies, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We rely on certain third parties to provide supplies and services necessary for our offshore drilling operations, including, but not limited to, drilling equipment suppliers, catering and machinery suppliers. Recent mergers have reduced the number of available suppliers, resulting in fewer alternatives for sourcing key supplies. Such consolidation, combined with a high volume of drilling units under construction, may result in a shortage of supplies and services thereby increasing the cost of supplies and/or potentially inhibiting the ability of suppliers to deliver on time, or at all. These cost increases, delays or unavailability could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and result in drilling unit downtime, and delays in the repair and maintenance of our drilling units.

While we believe that we currently have adequate internal control procedures in place, we are still exposed to potential risks from the requirement that we evaluate our internal controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

We have evaluated our internal controls systems in order to allow management to report on our internal controls, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We have performed the system and process evaluation and testing required to comply with the management certification requirements of Section 404. As a result, we have incurred additional expenses and a diversion of management’s time. While we have been able to fully implement the requirements relating to internal controls and all other aspects of Section 404 in a timely fashion, we cannot be certain that our internal control over financial reporting will be adequate in the future to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act or the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. If we are not able to maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting, we may be susceptible to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the DOJ and the SEC. Any such action could adversely affect our financial results and the market price of our securities.

Changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations, effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our tax returns could adversely affect our financial results.

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, treaties, and regulations both internationally and domestically. Tax laws, treaties and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. We are subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between the countries in which we operate. Our income tax expense is based upon the interpretation of the tax laws in effect in various countries at the time that the expense was incurred. A change in these tax laws, treaties or regulations, or in the interpretation thereof, could result in a materially higher tax expense or a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings. If any country successfully challenges our income tax filings based on our structure or the presence of our operations there, or if we otherwise lose a material dispute, our effective tax rate on worldwide earnings could increase substantially and our financial results could be materially adversely affected.

We may be required to repurchase certain of our indebtedness with cash upon a change of control or other triggering events.

Upon the occurrence of specified change of control events or certain losses of our vessels in the agreements governing our Credit Agreement, Senior Secured Notes or Notes, we will be required to offer to repurchase or repay all (or in the case of events of losses of vessels, an amount up to the amount of proceeds received from such event of loss) of such outstanding debt under such debt agreements at the prices and upon the terms set forth in the applicable agreements. In addition, in connection with certain asset sales, we will be required to offer to repurchase or repay such outstanding debt as set forth in the applicable debt agreements. We may not have sufficient funds available to repurchase or repay all of the debt that becomes due and payable pursuant to any such offer, which would constitute an event of default which in turn would likely trigger a default under our existing and any future debt agreements. Moreover, the holders and lenders under such debt agreements and any other of our future debt agreements may also limit our ability to repurchase debt. In that event, we would need to cure or refinance the applicable debt agreements before making an offer to purchase. Additionally, our existing debt agreements and any future indebtedness we incur may restrict our ability to repurchase these notes, including following a fundamental change. We may be unable to repay all of such indebtedness or obtain a waiver. Any requirement to offer to repurchase or repay any of our existing debt may therefore require us to refinance some or all of our other outstanding debt, which we may not be able to accomplish on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. These repurchase requirements may also delay or make it more difficult for others to obtain control of us.

Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, stakeholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests, and their ability to protect their rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited.

We are an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands. In addition, substantially all of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for holders of our securities to effect service of process within the United States upon our directors or executive officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the U.S. courts against our directors or executive officers.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (the “Memorandum and Articles”), the Companies Law (the “Companies Law”) (as the same may be supplemented or amended from time to time) of the Cayman Islands, and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of holders of our securities to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are, to a large extent, governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are different from those under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws which may provide significantly less protection to investors as compared to the United States, and some states, such as Delaware, which have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law.

The Cayman Islands courts are also unlikely:

•

to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States based on certain civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws; and

•

to impose liabilities against us, in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, based on certain civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws that are penal in nature.

Additionally, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to sue before the federal courts of the United States. There is no statutory recognition in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, although the courts of the Cayman Islands recognize and enforce a non-penal judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without re-examination of the merits of the underlying dispute, provided such judgment:

•

is final;

•

imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given;

•

is not in respect of taxes, a fine, or a penalty; and

•

was neither obtained in a manner, nor is of a kind enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands.

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands may stay proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.

We remain subject to litigation relating to our reorganization proceedings.

In connection with our bankruptcy cases, two appeals were filed relating to the confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization. Specifically, on January 29, 2016, Hsin Chi Su and F3 Capital filed two appeals before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware seeking a reversal of (i) the Court’s determination that Hsin Chi Su and F3 Capital did not have standing to appear and be heard in the bankruptcy cases, which was made on the record at a hearing held on January 14, 2016, and (ii) the Court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (I) Approving the Debtors’ (A) Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Sections 1125 and 1126(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, (B) Solicitation of Votes and Voting Procedures, and (C) Forms of Ballots, and (II) Confirming the Amended Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Offshore Group Investment Limited and its Affiliated Debtors [Docket No. 188], which was entered on January 15, 2016. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of any such appeals. An adverse outcome could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Investment in our Company’s Securities

We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations.

Following the completion of the Plan of Reorganization on February 10, 2016, on a consolidated basis, the Company had a debt outstanding of approximately $969.1 million aggregate principal amount, which consisted of $143.0 million under the Credit Agreement, approximately $750.0 million under the Notes, and approximately $76.1 million under the Senior Secured Notes. Our high level of indebtedness and the funds required to service such debt could, among other things, make it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its obligations under such indebtedness, increasing the risk that it may default on such debt obligations.

The Company’s earnings and cash flow may vary significantly from year to year due to the cyclical nature of the offshore drilling industry. Additionally, the Company’s future cash flow may be insufficient to meet its debt obligations and commitments, including the Notes. Any insufficiency could negatively impact the Company’s business. A range of economic, competitive, business, and industry factors will affect the Company’s future financial performance and, as a result, its ability to generate cash flow from operations and to pay its debt, including the Notes. Many of these factors, such as oil and natural gas prices, economic and financial conditions in the offshore drilling industry and the oil and gas industry, as well as the global economy or competitive initiatives of competitors, are beyond the Company’s control. If the Company does not generate enough cash flow from operations to satisfy its debt obligations, it may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as:

•

Refinancing or restructuring debt;

•

Selling assets;

•

Reducing or delaying capital investments; or

•

Seeking to raise additional capital.

It cannot be assured, however, that undertaking alternative financing plans, if necessary, would allow the Company to meet its debt obligations. An inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt obligations, including obligations under the Notes, or to obtain alternative financing, could materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to make payments on the Notes and its business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

There is no public market for our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, and there can be no assurance as to the development or liquidity of any market for any such securities.

There are substantial risks in investing in our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares given the general illiquid nature of such securities. There is no public trading market for our securities. Holders of our securities may find it difficult or impossible to find a qualified purchaser for such securities at any price. Because of this, it is hard to determine exactly the value of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

If a market for the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares develops, they may trade at a discount from the purchase price thereof.

If a market for the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares develops, they may trade at a discount from the purchase price thereof. The trading market for the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares may be adversely affected by, among other things:

•

changes in our financial performance or prospects;

•

the financial performance or prospects for companies in our industry generally;

•

the number of holders of the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares;

•

the interest of securities dealers in making a market for the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares; and

•

prevailing interest rates and general economic conditions.

The price for our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares may be volatile and may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including, among others:

•

changes in economic trends or the continuation of current economic conditions;

•

industry cycles and trends;

•

changes in government and environmental regulation;

•

adverse resolution of new or pending litigation against us;

•

changes in laws or regulations governing our business and operations;

•

the sustainability of an active trading market for our Ordinary Shares; and

•

future sales of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares by holders thereof.

These and other factors may lower the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the event of a drop in the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, you could lose a substantial part or all of your investment in our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of securities of many companies. In the past, holders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs and our resources and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.

Future sales of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, or the perception that these sales may occur, may depress the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

Additional sales of a substantial number of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, or the perception that such sales may occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares. As of August 15, 2016, the selling holders beneficially own approximately 69.02% of our Stapled Securities and 59.98% of our Ordinary Shares. The sale of all or a portion of the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares by the selling holders or our other holders, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares to decrease significantly.

Pursuant to the Company’s Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), the selling holders have certain demand and piggyback rights that may require us to file additional registration statements registering their Stapled Securities or to include sales of such Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other holders. Any Stapled Securities sold under these registration statements or this prospectus will be freely tradable. In the event such registration rights are exercised and a large number of Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares is sold, such sales could reduce the trading price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares. These sales also could impede our ability to raise future capital. Additionally, we will bear all expenses in connection with this registration and any such registrations, except that the selling holders may be responsible for their pro rata shares of underwriters’ discounts and commissions, if any, and certain other expenses.

The ownership percentage represented by the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares is subject to dilution, and future issuances of Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares may depress the market price of our Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares.

The ownership percentage represented by the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares is subject to dilution from issuances in connection with the Management Incentive Plan, conversion of the Stapled Securities (in the case of the Ordinary Shares), any other shares that may be issued, and the conversion of any options, warrants, convertible securities, exercisable securities, or other securities that may be issued.

In particular, conversion of the Stapled Securities will dilute the ownership interest of any existing shareholders. Also, in the future, similar to all companies, additional equity financings or other share issuances by the Company on a consolidated basis could adversely affect the value of the Ordinary Shares issuable upon such conversion. The amount and dilutive effect of any of the foregoing could be material.

Such future issuances or conversions may depress the market price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, and may impair our ability to raise additional capital in the financial markets at a time and price favorable to us.

Certain holders have significant influence over us, and their interests might conflict with or differ from your interests as a holder.

Certain holders of allowed secured debt claims acquired a significant ownership interest in the Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. If such holders were to act as a group, such holders would be in a position to control the outcome of all actions requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors, without the approval of other shareholders. This concentration of ownership could also facilitate or hinder a negotiated change of control of the Company and, consequently, have an impact upon the value of the Ordinary Shares.

Your equity interests are subordinated to our indebtedness.

In any subsequent liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the Ordinary Shares would rank below all debt claims against the Company, including the Credit Agreement, the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes. As a result, holders of the Ordinary Shares would not be entitled to receive any payment or other distribution of assets upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company until after all the Company’s obligations to their debt holders had been satisfied, including payments to lenders under the Credit Agreement and holders of the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes.

We have no current intention to pay cash dividends.

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on the Ordinary Shares in the immediate future as we expect to retain any future cash flows for debt reduction and growth. As a result, the success of an investment in the Ordinary Shares will depend entirely upon any future appreciation in the value of the Ordinary Shares. There is, however, no guarantee that the Ordinary Shares will appreciate in value or even maintain their initial value.

We may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

Even with our existing level of debt, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial amounts of additional secured and unsecured indebtedness in the future, including debt under future credit facilities, some or all of which may be secured on a first priority basis. Although the terms of any present or future credit facilities limit our ability to incur additional debt, these terms do not and will not prohibit us from incurring substantial amounts of additional debt for specific purposes or under certain circumstances. If new debt is added to our and our subsidiaries’ current debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face could intensify and could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

We may have insufficient funds to repurchase the Notes as required by the Indenture.

Under the terms of the Indenture, the Company may, at the holder’s option, be required to repurchase all or a portion of the Notes, in the event of a change of control or upon certain sales of assets. Additionally, the Company will be required to redeem the Notes upon certain events of loss of a Vessel.

In addition, under the terms of the Indenture, the Notes will become due and payable at a make-whole price specified therein upon the occurrence of any event of default provided therein. The Company on a consolidated basis may not have enough funds to pay the repurchase price, the redemption price or the make-whole price on the repurchase date, the redemption date or due date thereof, as applicable.

The terms of the Notes do not have the benefit of fulsome restrictive covenants, and the Notes may be negatively impacted in the event of certain transactions.

The Indenture might not protect you from several kinds of transactions that may adversely affect you. In particular, the Indenture will not contain covenants that limit our ability to pay dividends on, make distributions on, or redeem our share capital and, therefore, our ability to make interest payments and the value of the Notes may be negatively impacted in the event of a highly leveraged transaction or other similar transaction. Nor will the Indenture restrict the incurrence of indebtedness by our subsidiaries.

We will not have an obligation to make a repurchase offer following acquisitions, refinancings, recapitalizations or other transactions that could affect our capital structure, such as the acquisition of all or a substantial portion of our company by another entity or the consummation of a merger transaction, except in certain circumstances. The offshore drilling industry has seen significant consolidation in recent years with larger companies acquiring their smaller competitors. If we consummate such a transaction, there can be no assurance that such a transaction will require us to make an offer to repurchase the Notes.

The conversion rate of the Notes may not be adjusted for all dilutive events that may adversely affect the trading price of the Notes or the Ordinary Shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes.

The conversion rate of the Notes is subject to adjustment upon certain events, including the issuance of dividends on our Ordinary Shares, the issuance of rights or warrants, subdivisions, combinations, distributions of capital stock, indebtedness or assets, cash dividends and issuer tender or exchange offers as described under “Description of the Notes — Conversion Rights — Conversion Rate Adjustment.” The conversion rate will not be adjusted for other events, including, events that may adversely affect the trading price of the Notes or the Ordinary Shares issuable upon conversion of the notes.

Vantage Drilling International is a holding company and is dependent upon cash flows from its subsidiaries to meet its obligations.

Vantage Drilling International is a holding company, and as such, it conducts its operations through, most of its assets are owned by, and its operating income and cash flow are generated by, its subsidiaries. The Company is dependent upon cash flows from its subsidiaries to meet its debt service and related obligations, including the obligation to repurchase all or a portion of the Notes in the event of a change of control, as defined in the Indenture, or to pay the make-whole premium on the Notes required by the Indenture upon the occurrence of an event of default thereunder. Contractual provisions or laws, as well as its subsidiaries’ financial conditions and operating requirements, may limit the Company’s ability to obtain, from such subsidiaries, the cash required to meet such debt service or related obligations. Applicable tax laws may also subject such payments to further taxation. The inability to obtain cash from its subsidiaries may limit the Company’s ability to meet its debt service and related obligations even though there may be sufficient resources on a consolidated basis to satisfy such obligations.

If the Notes are rated investment grade at any time by both Rating Agencies and no default has occurred and is continuing under the Indenture, certain covenants contained in the Indenture will be suspended, and the holders of the Notes will lose the protection of these covenants.

The Indenture governing the Notes contains certain covenants that will be suspended and cease to have any effect from and after the first date when the Notes receive a rating equal to or higher than Baa3 (or the equivalent) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., or any successor to the rating agency business thereof (“Moody’s”) and BBB- (or the equivalent) by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services or any successor to the rating agency business thereof (“Standard & Poor’s and, together with Moody’s, the “Rating Agencies” and each rating above such level, an “Investment Grade Rating”). See “Description of the Notes—Certain Covenants.” These covenants restrict our ability to sell certain assets and require certain Restricted Subsidiaries to guarantee the Notes. Because these

restrictions would not apply to the Notes at any time the Notes receive an Investment Grade Rating from both Rating Agencies, the holders of the Notes would not be able to prevent us from, among other things, making certain asset sales. If after these covenants are suspended, the Rating Agencies were to downgrade their ratings of the Notes to a non-investment grade level, the covenants would be reinstated and the holders of the Notes would again have the protection of these covenants. However, any transactions entered into during such time as the Notes had an Investment Grade Rating would be permitted to remain in effect.

There may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any portion of the Notes.

The indebtedness under the Credit Agreement is secured, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens, on a first-priority basis by security interests in substantially all assets of the Company on a consolidated basis (henceforth, the “collateral”). The Senior Secured Notes and the Notes will be secured, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens, on a second-priority and a third-priority basis, respectively, by security interests in substantially all of the Company’s assets.

In the event of a foreclosure on the collateral (or a distribution in respect thereof in a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding), the proceeds from the collateral securing the Notes may not be sufficient to satisfy the obligations outstanding under such Notes because the proceeds would, under the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement (as defined herein), first be applied to satisfy the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes. Only after all of the obligations under the Credit Agreement and the obligations under the Senior Secured Notes have been satisfied will any remaining proceeds from the collateral on which the Notes have a third-priority lien be applied to satisfy the Company’s obligations under the Stapled Securities.

There may be defects in the collateral securing the Notes.

The collateral securing the Notes may be subject to exceptions, defects, encumbrances, liens, and other imperfections. Further, the Company has not conducted appraisals of all of its assets constituting collateral securing the Notes to determine if the value of the collateral upon foreclosure or liquidation equals or exceeds the amount of the Notes or such other obligation secured by the collateral. Accordingly, it cannot be assured that the remaining proceeds from a sale of the collateral would be sufficient to repay holders of the Notes all amounts owed under such Notes.

Additionally, the fair market value of the collateral is subject to fluctuations based on factors that include, among others, the condition of the offshore drilling industry, the ability to sell collateral in an orderly manner, general economic conditions, the availability of buyers, the Company’s failure to implement its business strategy, and similar factors. The amount received upon a sale of collateral would be dependent on numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the actual fair market value of the collateral at such time, and the timing and manner of the sale. By its nature, portions of the collateral may be illiquid and may have no readily ascertainable market value. In the event of a subsequent foreclosure, liquidation, bankruptcy, or similar proceeding, it cannot be assured that the proceeds from any sale or liquidation of the collateral will be sufficient to pay the Company’s obligations under the Notes, in full or at all, after first satisfying the obligations under the Credit Agreement in full and after satisfying the obligations under the Senior Secured Notes, which are more senior to the Notes. There can also be no assurance that the collateral will be saleable, and, even if saleable, the timing of its liquidation would be uncertain. Accordingly, there may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any of the amounts due on the Notes.

The Notes are subject to Intercreditor Agreements that provide that the holders’ rights to receive payments on the Notes will be effectively subordinated to the lenders and other secured parties under the Credit Agreement who have a first-priority security interest in the Collateral and the holders of the Senior Secured Notes who have a second-priority interest in the Collateral.

The Collateral is subject to first-priority liens in favor of the lenders and other secured parties under the Credit Agreement. The Intercreditor Agreements provides, among other things, that in the event that the Company is declared bankrupt, becomes insolvent or is liquidated or reorganized, their obligations under the Credit Agreement are entitled to be paid in full from the Collateral pledged as security for such obligation before any payment may be made with respect to the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes and that the Senior Secured Notes are entitled to be paid in full from the Collateral pledged as security for such obligation before any payment may be made with respect to the Notes. Holders of the Notes would then be entitled to be paid from the remaining Collateral. See “Description of the Notes—Security—Intercreditor Agreements—Subordination of Note Obligations.

Rights of holders of the Notes in the collateral may be adversely affected by the failure to perfect liens on the collateral or on collateral acquired in the future.

The failure to properly perfect liens on the collateral could adversely affect the collateral agent’s ability to enforce its rights with respect to the collateral for the benefit of the holders of the Notes. In addition, applicable law requires that certain property and rights acquired after the grant of a general security interest or lien can only be perfected at the time such property and rights are acquired and identified. There can be no assurance that the trustee or the collateral agent will monitor, or that the Company on a consolidated basis will inform the trustee or the collateral agent of the future acquisition of property and rights that constitute collateral, and that the necessary action will be taken to properly perfect the security interest in such after-acquired collateral. The trustee and the collateral agent have no obligation to monitor the acquisition of additional property or rights that constitute collateral or the perfection of any security interests therein. Such failure may result in the loss of the practical benefits of the liens thereon or of the priority of the liens securing the Notes against third parties.

The Indenture and the Intercreditor Agreements place limitations on rights of holders of the Notes.

The rights of the holders of the Notes with respect to the collateral securing such Notes will be substantially limited by the terms of the lien ranking agreements set forth in the Indenture and the Intercreditor Agreements (the “Intercreditor Agreements”), even during an event of default. Under the Indenture and the Intercreditor Agreements, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the higher priority liens are outstanding, any actions that may be taken with respect to (or in respect of) such collateral, including the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against such collateral and to control the conduct of such proceedings, and the approval of amendments to, releases of such collateral from the lien of, and waivers of past defaults under, such documents relating to such collateral, will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first-priority liens, and the holders of the Senior Secured Notes (secured by second-priority liens) and the Notes (secured by third-priority liens) may be adversely affected. Under the terms of the Intercreditor Agreements, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first-priority liens on the collateral are outstanding, if the holders of such indebtedness release the collateral in connection with any sale of collateral or in connection with any enforcement action or other exercise of remedies, the second-priority and third-priority security interests in such collateral securing the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes will be automatically and simultaneously released without any consent or action by the holders of the Senior Secured Notes or the Notes, subject to certain exceptions. The collateral so released will no longer secure the Company’s obligations under the Senior Secured Notes or the Notes and the related guarantees. To the extent the obligations with respect to the Credit Agreement were to be discharged without comparable replacement in the future, the foregoing risks will apply mutatis mutandis to the relationship between the second-priority security interests of the Senior Secured Notes and the third-priority security interests of the Notes, as if they were first-priority and second-priority secured interests, respectively.

The collateral will be subject to casualty risks.

The Company will be obligated under the Indenture and collateral agreements governing the Notes to maintain adequate insurance or otherwise insure against hazards as is customarily done by companies having assets of a similar nature in the same or similar localities. There are, however, certain losses that may either be uninsurable or not economically insurable, in whole or in part, including windstorm insurance for drilling units operating in the Gulf of Mexico. As a result, it is possible that the insurance proceeds will not compensate the Company fully for its losses. If there is a total or partial loss of any of the pledged collateral, the insurance proceeds received may be insufficient to satisfy the secured obligations of the Company, including the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes.

Rights of holders of Notes in the collateral may be adversely affected by bankruptcy proceedings.

The right of the collateral agent to repossess and dispose of the collateral securing the Notes and the guarantees and the other pari passu obligations upon acceleration is likely to be significantly impaired by federal bankruptcy law if bankruptcy proceedings are commenced by or against parent or the issuer prior to or possibly even after the collateral agent has repossessed and disposed of the collateral. Under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, a secured creditor,

such as the collateral agent for the holders of the Notes, is prohibited from repossessing its security from a debtor in a bankruptcy case, or from disposing of security repossessed from a debtor, without bankruptcy court approval. Moreover, bankruptcy law permits the debtor to continue to retain and to use collateral, and the proceeds, products, rents or profits of the collateral, even though the debtor is in default under the applicable debt instruments, provided that the secured creditor is given “adequate protection.” The meaning of the term “adequate protection” may vary according to circumstances, but it is intended in general to protect the value of the secured creditor’s interest in the collateral and may include cash payments or the granting of additional security, if and at such time as the court in its discretion determines, for any diminution in the value of the collateral as a result of the stay of repossession or disposition or any use of the collateral by the debtor during the pendency of the bankruptcy case. In view of the broad discretionary powers of a bankruptcy court, it is impossible to predict how long payments under the Notes could be delayed following commencement of a bankruptcy case, whether or when the collateral agent would repossess or dispose of the collateral, and whether or to what extent holders of the Notes or holders or lenders under any other instruments or agreements governing pari passu obligations would be compensated for any delay in payment of loss of value of the collateral through the requirements of “adequate protection.” Furthermore, in the event the bankruptcy court determines that the value of the collateral is not sufficient to repay all amounts due on the Notes or other pari passu obligations, the holders of the Notes and holders of other pari passu obligations would have “undersecured claims” as to the difference. U.S. federal bankruptcy laws do not permit the payment or accrual of interest, costs and attorneys’ fees for “undersecured claims” during the debtor’s bankruptcy case. Additionally, the collateral agent’s ability to foreclose on the collateral on behalf of the holders of pari passu obligations may be subject to the consent of third parties, prior liens and practical problems associated with the realization of the trustee’s security interest in the collateral. Moreover, the debtor or trustee in a bankruptcy case may seek to void an alleged security interest in collateral for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate. It may successfully do so if the security interest is not properly perfected or was perfected within a specified period of time (generally 90 days) prior to the initiation of such proceeding. Under such circumstances, a creditor may hold no security interest and be treated as holding a general unsecured claim in the bankruptcy case. It is impossible to predict what recovery (if any) would be available for such an unsecured claim if the issuer or parent became a debtor in a bankruptcy case. While U.S. bankruptcy law generally invalidates provisions restricting a debtor’s ability to assume and/or assign a contract, there are exceptions to this rule which could be applicable in the event that the issuer or parent become subject to a U.S. bankruptcy proceeding.

There also can be no assurance that courts outside of the United States would recognize the U.S. bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, difficulties may arise in administering a U.S. bankruptcy proceeding against the issuer or any of the guarantors with property located outside of the United States, and any orders or judgments of a bankruptcy court in the United States may not be enforceable in any foreign jurisdiction in which the issuer or any of the guarantors are organized. The rights of the collateral agent to enforce remedies may be significantly impaired by the restructuring or liquidation provisions of applicable jurisdictional bankruptcy laws, insolvency and other restructuring legislation if the benefit of such legislation is sought with respect to the issuer or parent. The risks outlined above regarding the difficulty of pursuing property that is collateral and that is located outside the United States is particularly relevant for parent, the issuer and the restricted subsidiaries since the drilling units that will serve as significant collateral for the Notes and guarantees and the other pari passu obligations is often, if not usually, outside the United States. Further, the holders of the Notes may receive in exchange for their claims a recovery that could be substantially less than the amounts of their claims (potentially even nothing), and any such recovery might consist of illiquid securities.

The Notes could be recharacterized by a bankruptcy court.

Recharacterization of a debt obligation to a capital contribution is an equitable remedy a bankruptcy court may direct if it determines that, upon an objection raised by a party in interest, a purported debt obligation is more properly characterized as a capital contribution. In making such a determination, bankruptcy courts consider, among other things, whether the parties intended to create a debt obligation and the nature of the instrument evidencing the obligation. Although the Company believes, and intends, the Notes to be a bona fide debt obligation, there can be no assurance a bankruptcy court would agree with the Company’s interpretation.

The conversion rate will only be adjusted upon certain events.

The conversion rate of the Notes is only subject to adjustment upon certain events, including, share splits, dividends or reclassification with respect to the Ordinary Shares and, certain other adjustments. See “Description of the Notes—Conversion Rights.” The conversion rate will not be adjusted for any other events.

Any changes to the Ordinary Shares would affect holders of the Notes.

Holders of the Notes will not be entitled to any rights with respect to the Ordinary Shares (including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to participate in any dividends or other distributions on the Ordinary Shares), but holders of the Notes will be subject to all changes affecting the Ordinary Shares. Holders of the Notes will have rights with respect to the Ordinary Shares only upon conversion. For example, in the event an amendment is proposed to the Memorandum and Articles requiring shareholder approval and the record date for determining the shareholders of record entitled to vote on the amendment occurs prior to delivery of the Ordinary Shares, such holders will not be entitled to vote on the amendment, although they will, nevertheless, be subject to any changes in the powers, preferences, or rights of the Ordinary Shares.

The Notes may not be rated or may receive a lower rating than anticipated.

It is not expected that the Company will seek a rating on the Notes. If, however, one or more rating agencies rates the Notes and assigns them a rating lower than the rating expected by investors, or reduces its rating in the future, the market price of the Notes and/or the Ordinary Shares could be reduced.

Any future pledge of collateral might be avoidable in a subsequent bankruptcy.

Any future pledge of collateral in favor of the collateral agent, including pursuant to security documents delivered after the date of the Indenture, might be avoidable by the pledgor (as a subsequent debtor in possession) or by its trustee in bankruptcy if certain events or circumstances exist or occur, including, among others, if the pledgor is insolvent at the time of the pledge, the pledge permits the holders of the Notes to receive a greater recovery than if the pledge had not been given, and a bankruptcy proceeding in respect of the pledgor is commenced within 90 days following the pledge, or, in certain circumstances, a longer period.

There are circumstances other than repayment or discharge of the Notes under which the collateral securing the Notes and guarantees will be released automatically, without the holders’ consent or the consent of the trustee under the Indenture governing the Notes.

Under various circumstances, some of the collateral securing the Notes will be released automatically, including:

•

a sale, transfer or other disposal of such collateral in a transaction not prohibited under the Indenture governing the Notes;

•

with respect to a contract unwind trigger (as such term is defined in the Indenture governing the Notes);

•

with respect to the collateral held by a Guarantor, upon the release of such Guarantor from its guarantee;

•

to the extent required in accordance with any intercreditor agreement; and

•

to the extent we have defeased or satisfied and discharged the Indenture governing the Notes.

In addition, a guarantee will be automatically released in connection with a sale of such Guarantor or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of that Guarantor, in each case, in a transaction not prohibited under the Indenture governing the Notes. The Indenture governing the Notes will also permit the board of directors of parent to designate one or more of our restricted subsidiaries that is a Guarantor of the Notes as an unrestricted subsidiary. If the board of directors of parent designates a subsidiary guarantor as an unrestricted subsidiary, all of the liens on any collateral owned by such subsidiary or any of its subsidiaries and any guarantees of the Notes by such subsidiary or any of its subsidiaries will be released under the Indenture governing the Notes. Designations of any unrestricted subsidiary will reduce the aggregate value of the collateral securing the Notes to the extent that liens on the assets of the unrestricted subsidiary and its subsidiaries are released. In addition, the creditors of the unrestricted subsidiary and its subsidiaries will have claims to the assets of the unrestricted subsidiary and its subsidiaries that are senior to any claims of the holders of Notes.

Foreclosing on the collateral may be difficult.

Substantially all of the collateral is located outside of the United States. In particular, the Emerald Driller, Sapphire Driller, Topaz Driller, Aquamarine Driller, Platinum Explorer, Titanium Explorer, and Tungsten Explorer (together, the “Vessels”) are highly mobile and are, or may be, located in international waters outside the jurisdiction of any court. Even when such collateral is within the jurisdiction of a court, such jurisdiction may not have effective or favorable foreclosure procedures and lien priorities, particularly if such collateral is routinely in transit. Any foreclosure proceedings could be subject to lengthy delays resulting in increased custodial costs, deterioration in the condition of the collateral, and substantial reduction of the value of such collateral. In addition, some jurisdictions may not provide a legal remedy for the enforcement of mortgages on the collateral.

The Vessels operate worldwide and the respective laws of each jurisdiction where a Vessel is actually located at the time the collateral agent may seek to enforce the ship mortgage will govern the foreclosure proceedings and distribution of proceeds. Such laws may vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Furthermore, all or some of those laws and procedures may be less favorable to mortgagees than those in other jurisdictions and may be less favorable than those applicable in the United States. The costs of enforcement in foreign jurisdictions, particularly if proceedings are ongoing simultaneously against the Vessels in different jurisdictions, can be high and can include fees based on the face amount of the mortgage(s) being enforced. Foreign court proceedings can also be slow and have unexpected procedural hurdles. Priorities accorded maritime lien claims and ship mortgages can vary in foreign jurisdictions, and some jurisdictions prefer certain local claimants (such as local suppliers of operating necessaries) to foreign claimants, such as the collateral agent or mortgagee. Consequently there are no assurances that the collateral agent will be able to enforce any one or more of the ship mortgages covering vessels that are located outside the United States.

Maritime liens may arise and take priority over the liens securing the Notes.

The laws of the various jurisdictions in which the Vessels may operate may give rise to the existence of maritime liens, which may take priority over the ship mortgages. Such liens may arise in support of, among other things, claims by unpaid ship repairers remaining in possession of such collateral, claims for salvage, claims for damage caused by a collision, claims for seamen’s wages and other employment benefits and claims for pilotage, as well as potential claims for necessary goods and services supplied to such collateral. This list should not be regarded as definitive or exhaustive, as the categories of claims giving rise to maritime liens, and the ranking of such liens, vary from one jurisdiction to another. Maritime liens can attach without any court action, notice, registration, or documentation and accordingly their existence cannot necessarily be identified.

U.S. federal, state and foreign fraudulent transfer laws may permit a court to void the Notes and the guarantees, subordinate claims in respect of the Notes and the guarantees and require holders of the Notes to return payments received. If this occurs, holders of the Notes may not receive any payments on the Notes.

U.S. federal, state and foreign fraudulent transfer and conveyance statutes may apply to the issuance of the Notes and the incurrence of any guarantees. Under U.S. federal bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws, which may vary from state to state and be different from other applicable foreign jurisdictions, the Notes or guarantees could be voided as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance if (1) the issuer or any of the guarantors, as applicable, issued the Notes or incurred the guarantees with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or (2) the issuer or any of the guarantors, as applicable, received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for either issuing the Notes or incurring the guarantees and, in the case of (2) only, one of the following is also true at the time thereof:

•

the issuer or any of the guarantors, as applicable, were insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of the issuance of the Notes or the incurrence of the guarantees;

•

the issuance of the Notes or the incurrence of the guarantees left the issuer or any of the guarantors, as applicable, with an unreasonably small amount of capital to carry on the business;

•

the issuer or any of the guarantors intended to, or believed that the issuer or such guarantor would, incur debts beyond the issuer’s or such guarantor’s ability to pay such debts as they mature;

•

the issuer or any of the guarantors was a defendant in an action for money damages, or had a judgment for money damages docketed against the issuer or such guarantor if, in either case, after final judgment, the judgment is unsatisfied.

A court would likely find that the issuer or a guarantor did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for the Notes or such guarantee if the issuer or such guarantor did not substantially benefit directly or indirectly from the issuance of the Notes or the applicable guarantee. As a general matter, value is given for a transfer or an obligation if, in exchange for the transfer or obligation, property is transferred or an antecedent debt is secured or satisfied. A debtor will generally not be considered to have received value in connection with a debt offering if the debtor uses the proceeds of that offering to make a dividend payment or otherwise retire or redeem equity securities issued by the debtor.

The issuer cannot be certain as to the standards a court would use to determine whether or not it or the guarantors were solvent at the relevant time or, regardless of the standard that a court uses, that the issuance of the guarantees would not be further subordinated to the other debt of the issuer or of the guarantors. Generally, however, an entity would be considered insolvent if, at the time it incurred indebtedness:

•

the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, was greater than the fair saleable value of all its assets;

•

the present fair saleable value of its assets was less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liability on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or

•

it could not pay its debts as they become due.

If a court were to find that the issuance of the Notes or the incurrence of the guarantee was a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, the court could void the payment obligations under the Notes or such guarantee or further subordinate the Notes or such guarantee to presently existing and future indebtedness of the issuer or of the related guarantor, or require the holders of the Notes to repay any amounts received with respect to such guarantee. In the event of a finding that a fraudulent transfer or conveyance occurred, holders of the Notes may not receive any repayment on the Notes. Further, the voidance of the Notes could result in an event of default with respect to other debt of parent and its subsidiaries that could result in acceleration of such debt.

Although each guarantee entered into by a guarantor will contain a provision intended to limit that guarantor’s liability to the maximum amount that it could incur without causing the incurrence of obligations under its guarantee to be a fraudulent transfer, this provision may not be effective to protect those guarantees from being voided under fraudulent transfer law, or may reduce that guarantor’s obligation to an amount that effectively makes its guarantee worthless.

In addition, different or additional fraudulent conveyance laws may exist in foreign jurisdictions which could result in the liens being avoided.

If the guarantees by the subsidiary guarantors are not enforceable, the Notes would be effectively subordinated to all liabilities of the subsidiary guarantors, including trade payables.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Characterization of the Stapled Securities

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company will treat the Stapled Securities as a single, indivisible investment constituting equity in the Company. However, it is possible that the Notes could be treated as a separate debt instrument of the Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to our Plan of Reorganization, certain holders of debt issued by the Company before its Chapter 11 restructuring received Stapled Securities, among other things, in exchange for such debt. If the Notes were characterized as a separate debt instrument and were deemed to be (or were treated as having been exchanged for other debt that was deemed to be) traded on an established securities market, a U.S. Holder (as defined below) might be required to accrue significant amounts of original issue discount (“OID”) in respect of the Notes.

For a discussion of these considerations, see “Taxation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONCERNING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which involve substantial risks and uncertainties. When used, statements which are not historical in nature, including those containing words such as “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “future” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements in this prospectus. These forward-looking statements are included throughout this prospectus, including under “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the risks and uncertainties described under “Risk Factors,” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the following:

•

our small number of customers;

•

credit risks of our key customers and certain other third parties;

•

reduced expenditures and demand by oil and natural gas exploration and production companies;

•

termination or renegotiation of our customer contracts;

•

general economic conditions and conditions in the oil and gas industry;

•

delays and cost overruns in construction projects;

•

competition within our industry;

•

excess supply of drilling units worldwide;

•

limited mobility between geographic regions;

•

operating hazards in the offshore drilling industry;

•

ability to obtain indemnity from customers;

•

adequacy of insurance coverage upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event;

•

operations in international markets;

•

governmental, tax and environmental regulation;

•

changes in legislation removing or increasing current applicable limitations of liability;

•

effects of new products and new technology on the market;

•

our substantial level of indebtedness;

•

our ability to incur additional indebtedness;

•

compliance with restrictions and covenants in our debt agreements;

•

identifying and completing acquisition opportunities;

•

levels of operating and maintenance costs;

•

our dependence on key personnel;

•

availability of workers and the related labor costs;

•

increased cost of obtaining supplies;

•

the sufficiency of our internal controls;

•

changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations;

•

applicability of foreign laws, including foreign labor and employment laws;

•

any non-compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; and

•

our incorporation under the laws of the Cayman Islands and the limited rights to relief that may be available compared to U.S. laws.

Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Any, or a combination, of these factors, could materially affect our future financial condition or results of operations and the ultimate accuracy of the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance, and our actual results and future developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Management cautions against putting undue reliance on forward-looking statements or projecting any future results based on such statements or present or prior earnings levels.

In addition, each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. We may not update these forward-looking statements, even if our situation changes in the future. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained from time to time in filings we may voluntarily make with the SEC, which may be obtained by contacting us or the SEC.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares that may be sold from time to time pursuant to this prospectus. The selling holders will receive all of the proceeds from the sale of the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares offered from time to time under this prospectus. We have agreed to pay certain expenses of the selling holders incurred in connection with the sale of Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares from time to time pursuant to this prospectus, but will not pay any underwriters’ discounts or commissions.

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Our ratio of earnings to fixed charges for each of the periods indicated is as follows:

Successor

Predecessor

Period from
February 10,
2016 to
June 30,
2016

Period from
January 1,
2016 to
February 10,

Years ended December 31,

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)

—

(b)

—

(b)

1.39

1.70

—

(b)

—

(b)

—

(b)

(a)

For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, fixed charges are the sum of (a) interest expensed and interest capitalized, (b) amortized premiums, discounts, capitalized expenses related to indebtedness, (c) an estimate of the interest expense within rental expense and (d) preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries. Earnings is the amount resulting from adding (a) pre-tax income from continuing operations before adjustment for income (loss) from equity investees, (b) fixed charges, (c) amortization of capitalized interest, (d) distributed income of equity investees and (e) our share of pre-tax losses of equity investees for which charges arising from guarantees are included in fixed charges and then subtracting from that total (a) interest capitalized, (b) preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries and (c) minority interest in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges.

(b)

For the period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016, the period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016 and the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, earnings were not sufficient to cover fixed charges by approximately $62.2 million, $469.0 million, $29.3 million, $171.9 million and $50.0 million, respectively.

MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND POLICY

There is no established trading market for our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares and there has not been an established trading market for our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares since we emerged from bankruptcy on February 10, 2016. Therefore, we are not able to provide information regarding the trading prices for the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

We have not paid dividends on our Ordinary Shares to date and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the immediate future as we contemplate that our cash flows will be used for debt reduction and growth. The payment of future dividends, if any, will be determined by our board of directors in light of conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, restrictions in financing agreements, business conditions and other factors. We are subject to certain restrictive covenants under the terms of the agreements governing our indebtedness, including restrictions on our ability to pay any cash dividends.

Repurchases of Equity Securities. There were no repurchases of equity securities during the fiscal fourth quarter ended December 31, 2015 or during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

OFFERING PRICE

The selling holders may offer the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares from time to time, if and to the extent as they may determine, through public or private transactions or through other means described under “Plan of Distribution” at prevailing market prices, at prices different than prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices. The selling holders may sell the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares through agents they select or through underwriters and dealers they select. The selling holders also may sell the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares directly to investors. If the selling holders use agents, underwriters or dealers to sell the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, we will name such agents, underwriters or dealers and describe any applicable commissions or discounts in a supplement to this prospectus if required. Neither our Stapled Securities nor our Ordinary Shares are listed on any national securities exchange and no public market currently exists for our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents the Company’s selected historical financial information as of and for the periods presented.

The selected historical financial information as of June 30, 2016 (successor) and for the successor period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016, the predecessor periods from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2015 has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected historical financial information as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected historical financial information as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 has been derived from the Company’s consolidated financial statements, not included elsewhere in this prospectus.

You should read the following selected historical financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus.


	Successor			Predecessor
	Period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016			Period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016			Six months ended June 30, 2015
	(unaudited) (in thousands)			(unaudited) (in thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
Revenue	$	78,297		$	23,540		$	434,904
Operating costs		62,404			25,213			190,059
General and administrative		17,863			2,558			12,691
Depreciation		30,457			10,696			63,404

Income (loss) from operations		(32,427	)		(14,927	)		168,750
Interest income		15			3			25
Interest expense and other financing charges		(29,422	)		(1,728	)(1)		(92,027	)
Gain on debt extinguishment		—			—			10,823
Other, net		318			(69	)		1,820
Reorganization items		(641	)		(452,923	)		—

Income (loss) before income taxes		(62,157	)		(469,644	)		89,391
Income tax provision		2,605			2,371			38,151

Net income (loss)		(64,762	)		(472,015	)		51,240
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			(969	)		667

Net income (loss) attributable to VDI	$	(64,762	)	$	(471,046	)	$	50,573

(1)	Contractual interest of $23,219 for the period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016.


	Successor
	June 30, 2016
	(unaudited) (in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents	$	240,502
Total other current assets		92,648
Property and equipment, net		868,038
Total other assets		10,815
Total assets		1,212,003
Total current liabilities		51,688
Long–term debt, net of discount of $127,974		839,831
Other long-term liabilities		11,269
Total VDI shareholder’s equity		309,215
Total liabilities and equity		1,212,003


	Successor			Predecessor
	Period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016			Period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016			Six months ended June 30, 2015
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Cash Flow Data
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	204		$	(21,365	)	$	24,659
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(7,982	)		116			(17,017	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(766	)		66,875			(54,605	)


	As of and For the Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013			2012			2011
										(unaudited)
	(In thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data
Revenue	$	772,265		$	882,904		$	728,256		$	459,743		$	425,420
Operating costs		359,610			405,697			324,767			211,651			222,485
General and administrative expenses		25,322			25,390			22,714			19,425			12,346
Depreciation and amortization		127,359			126,610			106,609			68,747			64,477

Income from operations		259,974			325,207			274,166			159,920			126,112
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment		10,823	(1)		4,408	(2)		(98,327	)(3)		(122,071	)(4)		(25,196	)(5)
Interest expense		(173,550	)(6)		(196,089	)		(198,545	)		(139,565	)		(147,260	)
Other income (expense)		4,231			(596	)		3,010			635			1,131
Reorganization items		(39,354	)(7)		—			—			—			—

Income (loss) before income taxes		62,124			132,930			(19,696	)		(101,081	)		(45,213	)
Income tax provision		39,870			39,817			27,921			18,904			10,626

Net income (loss)		22,254			93,113			(47,617	)		(119,985	)		(55,839	)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		5,036			257			(463	)		(3,343	)		(1,514	)

Net income (loss) attributable to VDI	$	17,218		$	92,856		$	(47,154	)	$	(116,642	)	$	(54,325	)

Other Financial Data
EBITDA Reconciliation
Net income (loss)	$	22,254		$	93,113		$	(47,617	)	$	(119,985	)	$	(55,839	)
Interest expense		173,550			196,089			198,545			139,565			147,260
Income tax provision		39,870			39,817			27,921			18,904			10,626
Depreciation		127,359			126,610			106,609			68,747			64,477

EBITDA (8)		363,033			455,629			285,458			107,231			166,524
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment		(10,823	)		(4,408	)		98,327			122,071			25,196
Reorganization items		39,354			—			—			—			—

Adjusted EBITDA (9)	$	391,564		$	451,221		$	383,785		$	229,302		$	191,720

Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents	$	203,420		$	75,801		$	50,326		$	487,232		$	94,996
Total other current assets		157, 323			243,411			243,186			182,869			114,189
Property and equipment, net		2,948,387			3,032,568			3,126,598			2,717,506			1,804,988
Total other assets		23,050			72,091			89,773			81,495			62,060

Total assets	$	3,332,180		$	3,423,871		$	3,509,883		$	3,469,102		$	2,076,233

Total current liabilities		132,616			341,380			389,070			344,920			256,622
Long-term debt		—	(10)		2,497,103			2,669,705			2,622,686			1,212,497
Other long-term liabilities		33,097			83,982			41,820			44,371			29,755
Liabilities subject to compromise		2,694,456			—			—			—			—
VDI shareholder’s equity		456,756			490,689			397,833			444,987			561,627
Noncontrolling interests		15,255			10,717			11,455			12,138			15,732

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,332,180		$	3,423,871		$	3,509,883		$	3,469,102		$	2,076,233

Cash Flow Data
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	92,587		$	239,724		$	18,876		$	(133,844	)	$	92,976
Net cash used in investing activities		(46,490	)		(35,693	)		(523,759	)		(874,117	)		(140,946	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		81,522			(178,556	)		67,977			1,400,198			118,051

(1)	Includes redemption discounts totaling $11.5 million in connection with discretionary open market repurchases of our pre-bankruptcy indebtedness offset by $0.7 million for the write-off of associated issuance discounts and deferred financing costs.

(2)	Includes redemption discounts totaling $7.1 million in connection with discretionary open market repurchases of our pre-bankruptcy indebtedness offset by $2.7 million for the write-off of associated issuance discounts and deferred financing costs.

(3)	Includes $92.3 million in prepayment and consent fees and $24.0 million for the write-off of deferred financing costs offset by $18.0 million of issuance premium associated with the early retirement of $1 billion of our pre-bankruptcy 11.5% Senior Notes due 2015 (“11.5% Senior Notes”).

(4)	Includes $115.0 million for consent fees and $28.2 million for the write-off of deferred financing costs offset by $21.1 million of issuance premium associated with the early retirement of $1 billion of pre-bankruptcy 11.5% Senior Notes.

(5)	Includes $21.7 million in prepayment fees and approximately $3.5 million for the write-off of deferred financing costs associated with the early retirement of the debt for the acquisition of the Aquamarine Driller.

(6)	Contractual interest of $178,049 during the year ended December 31, 2015.

(7)	Includes the write-off of $31.4 million of deferred finance charges and $5.7 million of debt discount and $2.2 million of post-petition professional fees incurred in connection with our bankruptcy proceedings.

(8)

(9)

(10)	$2.7 billion of long-term debt was classified as Liabilities Subject to Compromise as of December 31, 2015.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our financial position at June 30, 2016 and at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and our results of operations for the period from February 10 to June 30, 2016 (Successor Company) and the period from January 1 to February 10, 2016 (Predecessor Company) and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 (Predecessor Company) and the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in “Business,” “Risk Factors” and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future periods.

Overview

We are an international offshore drilling company focused on operating a fleet of modern, high specification drilling units. Our principal business is to contract drilling units, related equipment and work crews, primarily on a dayrate basis to drill oil and natural gas wells for our customers. We also provide construction supervision services for drilling units owned by others. Through our fleet of drilling units we are a provider of offshore contract drilling services to major, national and independent oil and natural gas companies, focused primarily on international markets.

The following table sets forth certain current information concerning our offshore drilling fleet as of July 29, 2016.


Name	Year Built		Water Depth Rating (feet)		Drilling Depth Capacity (feet)		Status
Jackups
Emerald Driller		2008		375		30,000		Mobilizing
Sapphire Driller		2009		375		30,000		Warm Stacked
Aquamarine Driller		2009		375		30,000		Operating
Topaz Driller		2009		375		30,000		Warm Stacked
Drillships (1)
Platinum Explorer		2010		12,000		40,000		Warm Stacked
Titanium Explorer		2012		12,000		40,000		Warm Stacked
Tungsten Explorer		2013		12,000		40,000		Operating

(1)	The drillships are designed to drill in up to 12,000 feet of water and are currently equipped to drill in 10,000 feet of water.

Reorganization

On the Petition Date, we filed the Plan of Reorganization in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (In re Vantage Drilling International (F/K/A Offshore Group Investment Limited), et al., Case No. 15-12422). On January 15, 2016, the District Court of Delaware confirmed the Company’s pre-packaged Plan of Reorganization and we emerged from bankruptcy effective on the Effective Date.

Pursuant to the terms of the Plan of Reorganization, the LSTC (as defined under “—Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates—Fresh Start Accounting”) term loans and were retired on the Effective Date by issuing the debt holders units of Stapled Securities of the reorganized Company, with each unit of Stapled Securities originally consisting of one New Share and $172.61 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, subject to adjustment upon the payment of interest in kind and certain cases of redemption or conversion of the Convertible Notes, as well as share splits, share dividends, consolidation or reclassification of the New Shares. As of June 30, 2016, taking into account the payment of interest in kind on the Convertible Notes on such date, each such unit of Stapled Securities became comprised of one New Share and $173.28 of principal of Convertible Notes. The New Shares and the Convertible Notes were issued subject to the terms of an agreement that prohibits the New Shares and Convertible Notes from being transferred or exchanged separately. For every $1,000 of principal, a note holder received 1.722798 units for the 2017 Term Loan, 1.725087 units for the 2019 Term Loan, 1.786070 units for our former 7.5% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2019 (the “7.5% Senior Notes”), and 1.728569 units for our former 7.125% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2023 (the “7.125% Senior Notes”). In total, the debt holders received 4,344,959 units under the Plan of Reorganization.

Other significant elements of the Plan of Reorganization included:

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Company’s pre-petition credit agreement was amended to (i) replace the $32.0 million revolving letter of credit commitment under its pre-petition facility with a new $32.0 million revolving letter of credit facility and (ii) repay the $150 million of outstanding borrowings under its pre-petition facility with (a) $7.0 million of cash and (b) the issuance of $143.0 million initial term loans.

10% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes. Holders of the Company’s pre-petition secured debt claims were eligible to participate in a rights offering conducted by the Company for $75.0 million of the Company’s 10% Second Lien Notes. In connection with this rights offering, certain creditors entered into a “backstop” agreement to purchase 10% Second Lien Notes if the offer was not fully subscribed. The premium paid to such creditors under the backstop agreement was approximately $2.2 million, paid $1.1 million in cash and $1.1 million in additional 10% Second Lien Notes, resulting in a total issued amount of $76.1 million of 10% Second Lien Notes, and raising $73.9 million, after deducting the cash portion of the backstop premium.

VDC Note. Effective with the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy, VDC’s former equity interest in the Company was cancelled. Immediately following that event, the VDC Note was converted into 655,094 New Shares in accordance with the terms thereof, in satisfaction of the obligation thereunder, which, including accrued interest, totaled approximately $62.0 million as of such date.

Upon emergence from bankruptcy on the Effective Date, we adopted fresh-start accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852, which resulted in the Company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes. Upon adoption of fresh-start accounting, our assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values as of the Effective Date. The Effective Date fair values of our assets and liabilities differed materially from the recorded values of our assets and liabilities as reflected in our historical consolidated balance sheets. The effects of the Plan of Reorganization and the application of fresh-start accounting are reflected in our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016 and the related adjustments thereto were recorded in our consolidated statements of operations as reorganization items.

Business Outlook

Expectations about future oil and natural gas prices have historically been a key driver of demand for our services. The International Energy Agency estimates that demand will increase by approximately 1.4 million barrels per day or 1.5% in 2016 and increase by approximately 1.3 million barrels per day or 1.3% in 2017. While this represents favorable growth in demand, it has not been enough to offset surplus production and high inventories which continue to depress oil prices.

In response to the significant decline in oil prices, exploration and development companies have been significantly reducing capital expenditure budgets for 2016 and beyond. Analyst mid-year surveys of exploration and production spending indicate that oil and gas companies continue to reduce capital expenditures and have been releasing rigs and significantly reducing equipment orders. Accordingly, we anticipate that our industry will experience depressed market conditions through the remainder of 2016 and 2017.

In addition to the reduction in demand for drilling rigs, additional supply of newbuild rigs is further depressing the market. There are currently 116 jackups and 43 deepwater floaters on order at shipyards with scheduled deliveries extending out to 2020. While 48 jackups and 13 floaters are scheduled for delivery during the remainder of 2016, it is unclear when these drilling rigs will actually be delivered as many rig deliveries have already been deferred to later dates and some rig orders have been canceled. In response to the oversupply of drilling rigs, a number of competitors are removing older less efficient rigs from their fleets by either cold stacking the drilling rigs or taking them permanently out of service. This process takes time as many of the drilling rigs are still working for customers on contracts. Accordingly, while we believe this is an important element in bringing the supply of drilling rigs back into balance with demand, it will not be sufficient to materially improve market conditions in 2016.

A summary of our backlog coverage of days contracted and related revenue as of August 15, 2016 forward is as follows:


	Percentage of Days Contracted						Revenues Contracted (in thousands)
	2016			2017			2016		2017		Beyond
Jackups		39	%		35	%	$	18,847	$	33,113	$	6,260
Drillships		33	%		33	%	$	36,570	$	102,200	$	87,000

Results of Operations

Our four jackup rigs began operations under their initial contracts in February 2009, August 2009, January 2010 and March 2010. Our first drillship, the Platinum Explorer, commenced operations in December 2010. Our second drillship, the Titanium Explorer, commenced operations in December 2012. Our third drillship, the Tungsten Explorer, commenced operations in September 2013.

Operating results for our contract drilling services are dependent on three primary metrics: available days, rig utilization and dayrates. The following table sets forth this selected operational information for the periods indicated. The period from February 10 to June 30, 2016 (Successor Company) and the period from January 1 to February 10, 2016 (Predecessor Company) are distinct reporting periods as a result of our emergence from bankruptcy on February 10, 2016.


	Successor			Predecessor
	Period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016			Period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016			Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Jackups
Rigs available		4			4			4
Available days (1)		568			160			724
Utilization (2)		55.0	%		53.6	%		85.5	%
Average daily revenues (3)	$	89,549		$	88,347		$	149,294
Deepwater
Rigs available		3			3			3
Available days (1)		426			120			543
Utilization (2)		33.3	%		33.3	%		95.9	%
Average daily revenues (3)	$	260,515		$	332,715		$	611,776

(1)	Available days are the total number of rig calendar days in the period.

(2)	Utilization is calculated as a percentage of the actual number of revenue earning days divided by the available days in the period. A revenue earning day is defined as a day for which a rig earns dayrate after commencement of operations.

(3)	Average daily revenues are based on contract drilling revenues divided by revenue earning days. Average daily revenue will differ from average contract dayrate due to billing adjustments for any non-productive time, mobilization fees and demobilization fees.

The following table sets forth this selected operational information for the years indicated.


	Years Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
Jackups
Rigs available		4			4			4
Available days (1)		1,460			1,460			1,460
Utilization (2)		76.7	%		99.2	%		87.1	%
Average daily revenues (3)	$	133,870		$	161,332		$	166,188
Deepwater
Rigs available		3			3			3
Available days (1)		1,095			1,095			832
Utilization (2)		83.0	%		85.1	%		93.3	%
Average daily revenues (3)	$	635,061		$	615,571		$	585,597

(1)	Available days are the total number of rig calendar days in the period. Newbuild rigs are included upon acceptance by the customer.

(2)	Utilization is calculated as a percentage of the actual number of revenue earning days divided by the available days in the period. A revenue earning day is defined as a day for which a rig earns dayrate after commencement of operations.

(3)	Average daily revenues are based on contract drilling revenues divided by revenue earning days. Average daily revenue will differ from average contract dayrate due to billing adjustments for any non-productive time, mobilization fees and demobilization fees.

The six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015

The following table is an analysis of our operating results for the periods indicated. The period from February 10 to June 30, 2016 (Successor Company) and the period from January 1 to February 10, 2016 (Predecessor Company) are distinct reporting periods as a result of our emergence from bankruptcy on February 10, 2016. References in these results of operations to the Successor Company refer to the period of February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016 and references to the Predecessor Company refer to the period of January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016.


	Successor			Predecessor
	Period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016			Period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016			Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(in thousands)
Revenues
Contract drilling services	$	64,960		$	20,891		$	410,869
Management fees		2,671			752			3,783
Reimbursables		10,666			1,897			20,252

Total revenues		78,297			23,540			434,904

Operating costs and expenses
Operating costs		62,404			25,213			190,059
General and administrative		17,863			2,558			12,691
Depreciation		30,457			10,696			63,404

Total operating expenses		110,724			38,467			266,154

Income (loss) from operations		(32,427	)		(14,927	)		168,750
Other income (expense)
Interest income		15			3			25
Interest expense and financing charges		(29,422	)		(1,728	)		(92,027	)
Gain on debt extinguishment		—			—			10,823
Other income (expense)		318			(69	)		1,820
Reorganization items		(641	)		(452,923	)		—

Total other income (expense)		(29,730	)		(454,717	)		(79,359	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(62,157	)		(469,644	)		89,391
Income tax provision		2,605			2,371			38,151

Net income (loss)		(64,762	)		(472,015	)		51,240
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			(969	)		667

Net income (loss) attributable to VDI	$	(64,762	)	$	(471,046	)	$	50,573

Revenue: The Aquamarine Driller and the Topaz Driller worked throughout the Successor Period. The Topaz Driller completed its contract in early July 2016 and is currently warm stacked. Additionally, the Sapphire Driller worked approximately 31 days during this period on a short-term contract in West Africa. During the Successor Period, these three rigs generated average daily revenue of approximately $89,549 per day. Deepwater utilization for the Successor Period averaged 33% as only the Tungsten Explorer worked during this period. Neither of our other two ultra-deepwater drillships worked during the Successor Period as the Platinum Explorer completed its initial 5-year contract during the fourth quarter of 2015 and the Titanium Explorer drilling contract was cancelled by the operator in August 2015. Average daily revenue declined for both jackups and drillships because drilling contractors have reduced dayrates in an effort to keep their rigs working in a market where the supply of drilling rigs continues to exceed demand for the rigs. Although we are marketing all of our rigs, only one drillship and one jackup are currently operating and are forecasted to operate in the second half of 2016.

In the Predecessor Period, we had two jackups working at an average daily revenue of approximately $88,347 per day as the Sapphire Driller completed its contract in November 2015 and did not work during the Predecessor Period and the Emerald Driller completed its contract in early January 2016. Deepwater utilization for the Predecessor Period averaged 33%, with the Tungsten Explorer operating throughout the period.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we had seven rigs under contract with customers. The utilization of our four jackups during this period averaged approximately 85.5% with average daily revenue of $149,294, while our three drillships had average utilization of 95.9% with average daily revenue of $611,766.

Management fees for both the Predecessor and Successor Periods averaged approximately $18,800 per day as the construction oversight contracts have established billing rates. Reimbursable revenue for the Successor Period was $10.7 million, and there were four rigs working during the period. Reimbursable revenue for the Predecessor Period was $1.9 million when three rigs worked for the entire period.

Operating costs: For the Successor Period, operating costs were approximately $62.4 million, including $8.5 million of reimbursable costs. For the Predecessor Period, operating costs were $25.2 million or approximately $90,000 per day based on total available days. Operating costs for the six months ended June 30, 2015 were approximately $190.1 million, including $12.4 million of reimbursable costs. The reduction in operating costs reflects reduced costs associated with idled rigs as well as cost saving initiatives implemented in 2016 for both operating and stacked rigs.

General and administrative expenses: General and administrative expenses for the Successor Period include professional fees incurred in connection with the filing of our registration statement on Form S-1 in June 2016 and increased legal expenses associated with our Petrobras investigation. Additionally, such expenses include severance costs of $4.5 million incurred in connection with the resignation of our former Chief Executive Officer, our former Chief Administrative Officer and our former General Counsel, as well as normal recurring general and administrative expenses. There were no similar charges incurred in the Predecessor Period or for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Depreciation expense: For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the Predecessor Period, depreciation expense is based on the historical cost basis of our property and equipment. Upon our emergence from bankruptcy, we applied the provisions of fresh-start accounting and revalued our property and equipment to fair value which resulted in a significant decrease in those values. Depreciation expense for the Successor Period is based on the reduced asset values of property and equipment as a result of the adoption of fresh-start accounting.

Interest expense and other financing charges: Interest expense for the Successor Period is calculated on the debt that was issued in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy on February 10, 2016. Interest expense is recorded post-petition if it will be paid during the bankruptcy proceedings or it is probable that the bankruptcy court will allow it as a claim. Interest expense for the Predecessor Period is calculated on the old credit agreement as provided for in the plan of Reorganization and on the VDC Note issued in connection with the plan of Reorganization. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is calculated on the outstanding debt during that period, which was significantly higher than the post-petition debt.

Gain on extinguishment of debt: During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we repurchased in the open market, at a discount to face value, $31.8 million of our 7.5% Senior Notes and $7.5 million of our 2017 Term Loan and recognized gains of $9.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, including the write-off of deferred financing costs of $1.0 million.

Reorganization items: In the Predecessor Period, we incurred $22.7 million of post-petition professional fees associated with the bankruptcy cases. Additionally, we incurred non-cash charges of $2.06 billion in fresh-start accounting adjustments, offset by a $1.63 billion non-cash gain on settlement of LSTC. We have continued to incur professional expenses in connection with our bankruptcy during the Successor Period.

Income tax expense: Our estimated annualized effective tax rates for the Successor Period and Predecessor Period were negative 9.4% and our estimated annualized effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was positive 42.0%, based on estimated annualized loss or profit before income taxes in each respective period, excluding income tax discrete items. For the 2016 Successor and Predecessor Periods, we had a loss before income taxes resulting in negative tax rates. Our income taxes are generally dependent upon the results of our operations and the local income taxes in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Decreases in taxes in the Successor and Predecessor Periods in 2016 are primarily due to decreases in income before income taxes due to the nonoperational status of the majority of the rigs in 2016. In some jurisdictions we do not pay taxes or receive benefits for certain income and expense items, including interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt and reorganization expenses.

2015 compared to 2014

The following table is an analysis of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			Change
	(In thousands)
Revenues
Contract drilling services	$	726,717		$	807,164		$	(80,447	)
Management fees		7,501			21,258			(13,757	)
Reimbursables		38,047			54,482			(16,435	)

Total revenues		772,265			882,904			(110,639	)

Operating costs and expenses
Operating costs		359,610			405,697			46,087
General and administrative		25,322			25,390			68
Depreciation		127,359			126,610			(749	)

Total operating expenses		512,291			557,697			45,406

Income from operations		259,974			325,207			(65,233	)
Other income (expense)
Interest income		84			70			14
Interest expense and financing charges (contractual interest of $178,049 during the year ended December 31, 2015)		(173,634	)		(196,159	)		22,525
Gain on debt extinguishment		10,823			4,408			6,415
Other income (expense)		4,231			(596	)		4,827
Reorganization items		(39,354	)		—			(39,354	)

Total other income (expense)		(197,850	)		(192,277	)		(5,573	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		62,124			132,930			(70,806	)
Income tax provision		39,870			39,817			53

Net income (loss)		22,254			93,113			(70,859	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		5,036			257			4,779

Net income (loss) attributable to VDI	$	17,218		$	92,856		$	(75,638	)

Revenue: Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased 13% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 and contract drilling revenue decreased 10% for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. The decrease in contract drilling revenue was primarily due to the following: (a) approximately $58.9 million due to reduced utilization on both our jackups and drillships, (b) approximately $39.8 million due to reduced dayrates on our jackup fleet, partially offset by approximately $18.2 million due to increased effective dayrates on our drillships.

Management fees and reimbursable revenues decreased approximately 65% and 30%, respectively, primarily due to a decrease in our management business as we completed the operations management contract for two jackups in Mexico in the prior year.

Jackup utilization for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased approximately 23% compared to the prior year due to idle time between contracts for the Aquamarine Driller. Deepwater utilization for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased approximately 2% compared to the prior year due primarily to the early termination of the Titanium Explorer contract by our customer in September 2015.

Operating costs: Operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased 11% compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, due primarily to the following: (a) approximately $15.6 million due to reduced costs following the early termination of the Titanium Explorer contract by the customer in September 2015, (b) approximately $10.9 million due to reduced costs on the Aquamarine Driller during the idle time between contracts in 2015, and (c) approximately $10.2 million due to reduced operations support costs resulting from cost savings initiatives.

General and administrative expenses: General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 were consistent with the year ended December 31, 2014. Increases in legal and professional fees of $1.6 million, primarily related to financing and restructuring activities, were offset by decreases in labor costs.

Depreciation expense: Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 was consistent with the year ended December 31, 2014.

Interest expense and other financing charges: Interest expense and other financing charges for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased over the fiscal year 2014 primarily due to lower debt outstanding and to the suspension of interest on our debt subsequent to our Chapter 11 filing.

Gain on extinguishment of debt: In the year ended December 31, 2015, we repurchased in the open market, at a discount to face value, $31.8 million of our pre-bankruptcy senior notes and $7.5 million of our pre-bankruptcy term loan and recognized gains of $9.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively, including the write-off of deferred financing costs of $564,000.

In connection with an additional principal payment of $42.0 million in June 2015 on our pre-bankruptcy term loan, we recognized a loss of $1.4 million resulting from the write-off of deferred financing costs of $855,000 and original debt issuance discount of $599,000, and in connection with an open market purchase of $2 million of our pre-bankruptcy term loan in December 2015, we recognized a gain of $313,000.

In the year ended December 31, 2014, we repurchased in the open market, at a discount to face value, $47.4 million and $31.4 million of two series of our pre-bankruptcy notes, and recognized gains of $2.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The gains were partially offset by the write-off of deferred financing costs of $1.2 million.

Reorganization items: After the filing of our bankruptcy petition on December 3, 2015, we incurred $2.2 million of post-petition professional fees associated with the bankruptcy cases. Additionally, we incurred non-cash charges of $31.4 million and $5.7 million to write-off unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discounts, respectively, associated with the indebtedness expected to be allowed claims under our bankruptcy.

Income tax expense: Our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 was earned in higher taxed jurisdictions (i.e. deemed profit) as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014; accordingly, our tax expense for 2015 was approximately the same as for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests: Our net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes a $4.5 million income tax benefit related to an audit settlement.

2014 compared to 2013

The following table is an analysis of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			Change
	(In thousands)
Revenues
Contract drilling services	$	807,164		$	666,129		$	141,035
Management fees		21,258			14,123			7,135
Reimbursables		54,482			48,004			6,478

Total revenues		882,904			728,256			154,648

Operating costs and expenses
Operating costs		405,697			324,767			(80,930	)
General and administrative		25,390			22,714			(2,676	)
Depreciation		126,610			106,609			(20,001	)

Total operating expenses		557,697			454,090			(103,607	)

Income from operations		325,207			274,166			51,041
Other income (expense)
Interest income		70			234			(164	)
Interest expense and financing charges		(196,159	)		(198,779	)		2,620
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment		4,408			(98,327	)		102,735
Other income (expense)		(596	)		3,010			(3,606	)
Reorganization items		—			—			—

Total other income (expense)		(192,277	)		(293,862	)		101,585

Income (loss) before income taxes		132,930			(19,696	)		152,626
Income tax provision		39,817			27,921			11,896

Net income (loss)		93,113			(47,617	)		140,730
Net income(loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		257			(463	)		720

Net income (loss) attributable to VDI	$	92,856		$	(47,154	)	$	140,010

Revenue: Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased 21% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 and contract drilling revenue increased 21% for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013. The increase in contract drilling revenue was primarily due to the following: (a) approximately $103.0 million due to commencement of operations of the Tungsten Explorer in September 2013, (b) approximately $16.6 million resulting from improved uptime performance on the Titanium Explorer, and (c) approximately $26.7 million due to increased operating days on the Sapphire Driller.

Jackup utilization for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased approximately 12% compared to the prior year due to days out of service for the Sapphire Driller in 2013 following the early termination of its drilling contract in May 2013. Drillship utilization for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased approximately 8% compared to the prior year due to the mobilization of the Tungsten Explorer from Asia to West Africa during 2014.

The approximate 13% increase in reimbursable revenue is primarily due to having one additional drillship operating for the full year in 2014 as compared to 2013 and additional reimbursable purchase requests from jackup drilling customers.

Operating costs: Operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased 25% compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, due primarily to the following: (a) approximately $50.7 million of increased costs due to commencement of operations on the Tungsten Explorer, (b) approximately $23.3 million of increased costs associated with the relocation of the Titanium Explorer from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico to West Africa, and (c) approximately $8.6 million of increased costs due to increased operating days on the Sapphire Driller.

General and administrative expenses: Increases in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 were primarily due to increased legal fees related to ongoing litigation.

Depreciation expense: The increase in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily due to the addition of the Tungsten Explorer to our operating fleet in the third quarter of 2013.

Interest expense and other financing charges: Interest expense and other financing charges for the year ended December 31, 2014 were comparable to the fiscal year 2013; lower interest expense in 2014, due to lower debt levels, was offset by a reduction of capitalized interest. We did not capitalize any interest and amortization costs in the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $15.0 million capitalized in the year ended December 31, 2013. The reduction in capitalized interest was due to the Tungsten Explorer commencing operations in September 2013.

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt: In the year ended December 31, 2014, we repurchased in the open market, at a discount to face value, $47.4 million of our 7.125% Senior Notes and $31.4 million of our 7.5% Senior Notes and recognized gains of $2.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The gains were partially offset by the write-off of deferred financing costs of $1.2 million. In connection with an additional principal payment of $42.0 million in June 2014 on the 2017 Term Loan (the “2017 Term Loan”), we recognized a loss of $1.4 million resulting from the write-off of deferred financing costs of $820,000 and original debt issuance discount of $576,000, and in connection with an open market purchase of $2 million of the 2017 Term Loan in December 2014, we recognized a gain of $313,000.

In the year ended December 31, 2013, in connection with the early retirement of the remaining $1.0 billion of 11.5% Senior Notes, we recognized a loss of $98.3 million resulting from the payment of early redemption fees and consent fees of $92.3 million and the write-off of deferred financing costs of $24.0 million, which were offset by the early recognition of debt issuance premium of $18.0 million.

Income tax expense: The $11.9 million increase in income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 was primarily due to increased revenue earned in deemed profit jurisdictions as compared to 2013. In some jurisdictions we do not pay taxes or incur tax impacts for certain income and expense items including interest expense and gain or loss on extinguishment of debt.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2016, we had working capital of approximately $281.4 million, including approximately $240.5 million of cash available for general corporate purposes. Additionally, we have posted $4.2 million of cash as collateral for bid tenders and performance bonds. We anticipate our sustaining capital expenditures through 2017 to be approximately $2.5 to $3.1 million primarily for fleet capital spares. Scheduled principal debt maturities and interest payments from June 30, 2016 to December 31, 2017 are approximately $29.1 million. We expect to fund our capital expenditures and debt related payments through 2017 from our available working capital and cash flow from operations. As our currently warm stacked rigs obtain new contracts, we could incur reactivation and mobilization costs for these rigs, as well as customer requested equipment upgrades. These costs could be significant and may not be recoverable from the customer. We currently have $25.2 million available for the issuance of letters of credit under our revolving letter of credit facility.

The table below includes a summary of our cash flow information for periods indicated.


	Successor			Predecessor
	Period from February 10, 2016 to June 30, 2016			Period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016			Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(in thousands)
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	204		$	(21,365	)	$	24,659
Investing activities		(7,982	)		116			(17,017	)
Financing activities		(766	)		66,875			(54,605	)

Changes in cash flows from operating activities for the Successor and Predecessor Periods are driven by changes in net income (see discussion of changes in net income in “Results of Operations” above) and significant collections from our customers during the period. Changes in cash flows used in investing activities are dependent upon our level of capital expenditures, which varies based on the timing of projects. Cash used for capital expenditures totaled $8.0 million in the Successor Period. In the six months ended June 30, 2015 we made debt payments of $54.6 million, including both scheduled maturities and discretionary open market purchases of pre-bankruptcy debt. In the Successor Period, we made scheduled maturity payments on post-bankruptcy debt totaling $0.7 million.

The table below includes a summary of our cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			Change
	(In thousands)
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	92,587		$	239,724		$	(147,137	)
Investing activities		(46,490	)		(35,693	)		(10,797	)
Financing activities		81,522			(178,556	)		260,078

Changes in cash flows from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 are driven by changes in net income (see discussion of changes in net income in “Results of Operations” above) and significant collections from our customers during the period. Changes in cash flows used in investing activities are dependent upon our level of capital expenditures, which varies based on the timing of projects. Cash used for capital expenditures totaled $46 million in 2015 as compared to $36 million in 2014. Changes in cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 are primarily due to higher borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility and lower discretionary open market purchases of pre-bankruptcy debt as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014.

The table below includes a summary of our cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			Change
	(In thousands)
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	239,724		$	18,876		$	220,848
Investing activities		(35,693	)		(523,759	)		488,066
Financing activities		(178,556	)		67,977			(246,533	)

Changes in cash flows from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 are driven primarily by changes in net income (see discussion of changes in net income in “Results of Operations” above). Changes in cash flows used in investing activities are dependent upon our level of capital expenditures, which varies based on the timing of projects. Cash used for capital expenditures totaled $36 million in 2014 as compared to $524 million in 2013. Capital expenditures in 2013 included the final shipyard payment for the Tungsten Explorer. Changes in cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 are primarily due to discretionary open market purchases of pre-bankruptcy debt whereas cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 are from the refinancing of debt.

On December 1, 2015, we and VDC entered into the Restructuring Agreement with a majority of our secured creditors. Pursuant to the terms of the Restructuring Agreement, the Company agreed to pursue the Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and VDC would commence official liquidation proceedings under the laws of the Cayman Islands. On December 2, 2015, pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement, the Company acquired two subsidiaries responsible for the management of the Company from VDC in exchange for the VDC Note in the original principal amount of $61.5 million.

On December 3, 2015, the Company and 24 debtor subsidiaries, including five debtor subsidiaries of VDC who were guarantors of the Company’s pre-bankruptcy secured debt, filed the Plan of Reorganization in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (In re Vantage Drilling International (F/K/A Offshore Group Investment Limited), et al., Case No. 15-12422). On January 15, 2016, the District Court of Delaware confirmed the Company’s pre-packaged Plan of Reorganization and the Company emerged from bankruptcy effective February 10, 2016. The significant elements of the Plan of Reorganization included:

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Company’s Credit Agreement amended the pre-bankruptcy credit agreement to (i) replace the $32.0 million revolving letter of credit commitment under its pre-petition facility with a new $32.0 million revolving letter of credit facility and (ii) repay the $150 million of outstanding borrowings under its pre-petition facility with (a) $7.0 million of cash and (b) the issuance of $143.0 million initial term loans.

The obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries, subject to limited exceptions, and secured on a first priority basis by substantially all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ assets, including ship mortgages on all vessels, assignments of related earnings and insurance and pledges of the capital stock of all guarantors, in each case, subject to certain exceptions. The maturity date of the term loans and commitments established under the Credit Agreement is December 31, 2019. Interest is payable on the unpaid principal amount of each term loan under the Credit Agreement at the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 6.5%, with a LIBOR floor of 0.5%. The initial term loans are currently bearing interest at 7.15%.

Fees are payable on the outstanding face amount of letters of credit at a rate per annum equal to 5.50% as such rate may be increased from time to time pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement. As of June 30, 2016, we have $6.8 million outstanding under our revolving letter of credit facility.

The Credit Agreement includes customary representations and warranties, mandatory prepayments, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default, including covenants that, among other things, restrict the granting of liens, the incurrence of indebtedness, the making of investments and capital expenditures, the sale or other conveyance of assets, including vessels, transactions with affiliates, prepayments of certain debt and the operation of vessels. The Credit Agreement also requires that the Company maintain certain levels of available cash (defined to include unrestricted cash and cash equivalents plus undrawn commitments).

10% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes. The Company engaged in a rights offering for $75.0 million of new 10% Second Lien Notes for certain holders of its secured debt claims. In connection with this rights offering, certain creditors entered into a “backstop” agreement to purchase 10% Second Lien Notes if the offer was not fully subscribed. The premium paid to such creditors under the backstop agreement was approximately $2.2 million, paid $1.1 million in cash and $1.1 million in additional 10% Second Lien Notes, resulting in a total issued amount of $76.1 million of 10% Second Lien Notes, and raising $73.9 million in proceeds to the Company, after deducting the cash portion of the backstop premium.

The 10% Second Lien Notes were issued at par, and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a senior secured basis, by certain subsidiaries of the Company. The 10% Second Lien Notes mature on December 31, 2020, and bear interest from the date of their issuance at the rate of 10% per year. Interest on outstanding 10% Second Lien Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears, commencing on June 30, 2016. Interest is computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. The 10% Second Lien Notes rank behind the Credit Agreement as to collateral.

The Second Lien Indenture includes customary covenants and events of default, including covenants that, among other things, restrict the granting of liens, restrict the making of investments, restrict the incurrence of indebtedness and the conveyance of vessels, limit transactions with affiliates, and require that the Company provide periodic financial reports.

1%/12% Step-Up Senior Secured Third Lien Convertible Notes. The Company issued 4,344,959 New Shares and approximately $750.0 million of Convertible Notes to certain creditors holding approximately $2.5 billion of pre-petition secured debt claims. The New Shares issued to these creditors and the Convertible Notes may only be traded together and not separately. The Convertible Notes mature on December 31, 2030 and are convertible into New Shares, in certain circumstances, at a conversion price (subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Indenture) which was $95.60 as of the issue date.

The Company’s obligations under the Convertible Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (except for customary release provisions), on a senior secured basis, by substantially all of the subsidiaries of the Company, and the obligations of the Company and guarantors are secured by liens on substantially all of their respective assets, subject to certain exceptions as described under “Description of the Notes—Security—Collateral Agreements”. The guarantees by the Company’s subsidiaries of the Convertible Notes are joint and several. The Company has no independent assets or operations apart from the assets and operations of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Any subsidiaries of the Company other than the subsidiary guarantors are minor. In addition, there are no significant restrictions on the Company’s or any subsidiary guarantor’s ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan. The Indenture includes customary covenants that restrict the granting of liens and customary events of default, including, among other things, failure to issue securities upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.

Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears commencing June 30, 2016 as payment in kind, either through an increase in the outstanding principal amount of the Convertible Notes or, if the Company is unable to increase such principal amount, by the issuance of additional Convertible Notes. Interest is computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months at a rate of 1% per annum for the first four years and then increasing to 12% per annum until maturity.

The principal balance of the Convertible Notes (including payment in kind interest thereon) is convertible into New Shares at a conversion rate based on an initial price per share of $95.60 per New Ordinary Share, subject to adjustment, as described in the Indenture. The Convertible Notes are convertible only (a) prior to the third anniversary of the issue date (February 10, 2016), (i) upon the instruction of holders of a majority in principal amount of the Convertible Notes or (ii) upon the full and final resolution of all potential Investigation Claims (as defined below), as determined in good faith by the board of directors of the Company (which determination shall require the affirmative vote of a supermajority of the non-management directors), and (b) from and after February 10, 2019 through their maturity date of December 31, 2030, upon the approval of the Board (which approval shall require the affirmative vote of a supermajority of the non-management directors). For these purposes, (i) “supermajority of the non-management directors” means five affirmative votes of non-management directors assuming six non-management directors eligible to vote and, in all other circumstances, the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the non-management directors eligible to vote and (ii) “Investigation Claim” means any claim held by a United States or Brazilian governmental unit and arising from or related to the procurement of that certain Agreement for the Provision of Drilling Services, dated as of February 4, 2009, by and between Petrobras Venezuela Investments & Services B.V. and Vantage Deepwater Company, as amended, modified, supplemented, or novated from time to time.

VDC Note. Effective with the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy, VDC’s former equity interest in the Company was cancelled. Immediately following that event, the Company issued 655,094 New Shares to VDC in repayment of approximately $62.0 million, including accrued interest, for the VDC Note.

All trade payables, credits, wages and other related obligations were unimpaired by the Plan of Reorganization. The Plan of Reorganization allowed the Company to continue business operations during the court proceedings and maintain all operating assets and agreements. The Company had adequate liquidity prior to the filing and did not have to seek any debtor-in-possession financing.

During 2015, prior to entering into the Plan of Reorganization, we retired approximately $79.4 million principal amount of our pre-bankruptcy debt including approximately $40.1 million of scheduled maturities and during 2014, we retired approximately $186.3 million principal amount of pre-bankruptcy debt, including $63.5 million of scheduled term loan maturities.

Contractual Obligations

In the table below, we set forth our December 31, 2015 contractual obligations, excluding approximately $2.7 billion of pre-bankruptcy debt classified as Liabilities Subject to Compromise (“Liabilities Subject to Compromise”). The Liabilities Subject to Compromise were discharged in connection with the implementation of the pre-packaged Plan of Reorganization upon our emergence from bankruptcy on February 10, 2016. Some of the figures included in this table are based on our estimates and assumptions about these obligations, including their duration and other factors. The contractual obligations we may actually pay in future periods may vary from those reflected in the table because the estimates and assumptions are subjective.


	Total		2016		2017-2018		2019-2020		After 5 Years
	(in thousands)
VDC Note, including interest	$	62,637	$	62,637	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest payments (1)		11,802		9,034		2,768		—		—
Operating lease payments (2)		12,334		3,693		3,214		2,328		3,099
Purchase obligations		15,701		15,701		—		—		—

Total as of December 31, 2015	$	102,474	$	91,065	$	5,982	$	2,328	$	3,099

(1)	Amounts represent interest payments on pre-petition credit facility that was discharged as per the Plan of Reorganization in February 2016.

(2)	Amounts represent lease payments under existing operating leases. We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business, some of which contain renewal options. Our future cash payments would change if we exercised those renewal options and if we enter into additional operating leases.

In the table below, we set forth our pro forma contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015, which gives effect to our Plan of Reorganization upon our emergence from bankruptcy on February 10, 2016. Some of the figures included in this table are based on our estimates and assumptions about these obligations, including their duration and other factors. The contractual obligations we will actually pay in future periods may vary from those reflected in the table because the estimates and assumptions are subjective.


	Total		2016		2017-2018		2019-2020		After 5 Years
	(in thousands)
Credit Agreement Term Loan		143,000	$	1,430	$	2,860	$	138,710	$	—
10% Second Lien Notes		76,125		—		—		76,125		—
Convertible Notes		2,777,242								2,777,242
Interest payments		76,437		16,340		35,715		24,381		—
Operating lease payments (1)		12,334		3,693		3,214		2,328		3,099
Purchase obligations		15,701		15,701		—		—		—

Total as of December 31, 2015	$	3,100,839	$	37,164	$	41,789	$	241,544	$	2,780,341

(1)	Amounts represent lease payments under existing operating leases. We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business, some of which contain renewal options. Our future cash payments would change if we exercised those renewal options and if we enter into additional operating leases.

Commitments and Contingencies

We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business for office space, housing, vehicles and specified operating equipment. Some of these leases contain options that would cause our future cash payments to change if we exercised those options. We are subject to litigation, claims and disputes in the ordinary course of business, some of which may not be covered by insurance. There is an inherent risk in any litigation or dispute and no assurance can be given as to the outcome of any claims. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of any existing litigation, claims or disputes will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2015, we became aware that Hamylton Padilha, the Brazilian agent the Company used in the contracting of the Titanium Explorer drillship to Petrobras, had entered into a plea arrangement with the Brazilian authorities in connection with his role in facilitating the payment of bribes to former Petrobras executives. Among other things, Mr. Padilha provided information to the Brazilian authorities of an alleged bribery scheme between former Petrobras executives and Mr. Hsin-Chi Su, who was, at the time of the alleged bribery scheme, a member of the Board of Directors and a significant shareholder of VDC. When we learned of Mr. Padilha’s plea agreement and the allegations, we voluntarily contacted the DOJ and the SEC to advise them of these recent developments, as well as the fact that we had engaged outside counsel to conduct an internal investigation of the allegations. Our internal investigation is ongoing and we are cooperating with the DOJ and SEC in their investigation of these allegations. In connection with our cooperation with the DOJ and SEC, we recently advised both agencies that in early 2010, we engaged outside counsel to investigate a report of allegations of improper payments to customs and immigration officials in Asia. That investigation was concluded in 2011, and we determined at that time that no disclosure was warranted; however, in an abundance of caution, we are reviewing the matter again in light of the allegations in the Petrobras matter. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, if the DOJ or the SEC determine that violations of the FCPA have occurred, the Company could be subject to civil and criminal sanctions, including monetary penalties, as well as additional requirements or changes to our business practices and compliance programs, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Additionally, if we become subject to any judgment, decree, order, governmental penalty or fine, this may constitute an event of default under the terms of our secured debt agreements and result in our outstanding debt becoming immediately due and payable.

Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. While management believes current estimates are appropriate and reasonable, actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our financial operations.

Fresh-start Accounting: Effective with our bankruptcy filing on December 3, 2015, we were subject to the requirements of ASC 852. All expenses, realized gains and losses and provisions for losses directly associated with the bankruptcy proceedings were classified as “reorganization items” in the consolidated statements of operations. Certain pre-petition liabilities subject to Chapter 11 proceedings were considered liabilities subject to compromise (“LSTC”) on the Petition Date and just prior to our emergence from bankruptcy on the Effective Date. The LSTC classification distinguished such liabilities from the liabilities that were not expected to be compromised and liabilities incurred post-petition.

Upon emergence from bankruptcy, we adopted fresh-start accounting, which resulted in the Company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes. Upon adoption of fresh-start accounting, our assets and liabilities were recorded at their fair values as of the Effective Date. The Effective Date fair values of our assets and liabilities differed materially from the recorded values of our assets and liabilities as reflected in our historical consolidated balance sheets. The effects of the Plan of Reorganization and the application of fresh-start accounting are reflected in our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016 and the related adjustments thereto were recorded in our consolidated statement of operations as reorganization items for the period from January 1 to February 10, 2016.

Variable Interest Entities. In addition to the consolidation of our majority owned subsidiaries, we also consolidate variable interest entities (“VIEs”) when we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. Determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE is based on whether an entity has (1) the power to direct activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Our determination of the primary beneficiary of a VIE considers all relationships between us and the VIE. Certain subsidiaries of VDC, who are guarantors of our pre-petition debt, were part of the Plan of Reorganization discussed above and became our subsidiaries upon emergence on February 10, 2016. We have consolidated these entities in our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the two years ended December 31, 2015 because we determined that they were VIEs and that we were the primary beneficiary.

Property and Equipment: Our long-lived assets, primarily consisting of the values of our drilling rigs, are the most significant amount of our total assets. We make judgments with regard to the carrying value of these assets, including amounts capitalized, componentization, depreciation and amortization methods, salvage values and estimated useful lives. We capitalize interest costs related to the financings of our drilling rigs while they are under construction and prior to the commencement of each vessel’s first contract, which has increased the carrying value of the drilling rigs. Our weighted average cost of capital, which is the key component used in our calculation of capitalized interest, is directly impacted by the volatility in the global financial and credit markets. The completion of a construction project has an impact on the amount of interest expense that is prospectively recognized in our results of operations. Drilling rigs are depreciated on a component basis over estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis as of the date placed in service. Other assets are depreciated upon placement in service over estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis.

We evaluate the realization of property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss on our property and equipment exists when estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. Any impairment loss recognized would be computed as the excess of the asset’s carrying value over the estimated fair value. Estimates of future cash flows require us to make long-term forecasts of our future revenues and operating costs with regard to the assets subject to review. Our business, including the utilization rates and dayrates we receive for our drilling rigs, depends on the level of our customers’ expenditures for oil and natural gas exploration, development and production expenditures. Oil and natural gas prices and customers’ expectations of potential changes in these prices, the general outlook for worldwide economic growth, political and social stability in the major oil and natural gas producing basins of the world, availability of credit and changes in governmental laws and regulations, among many other factors, significantly affect our customers’ levels of expenditures. Sustained declines in oil and natural gas prices, worldwide rig counts and utilization, reduced access to credit markets and any other significant adverse economic news could require us to evaluate the realization of our drilling rigs. The rapid and significant decline in oil prices over the last six months of 2014 and throughout 2015, coupled with steep capital budget cuts by exploration and production companies and the significant number of newbuild ultra deepwater floaters and jackups deliveries scheduled for 2015 and 2016, required us to undertake an analysis of recoverability of the carrying value of our drilling rigs. Assumptions used in the analysis, including those used in our annual and long-term budgetary process, included expected utilization and revenue efficiency rates, expected dayrates and operating expenses, life expectancy, and planned out-of-service time for special periodic surveys and other inspections. The results of the analysis indicated that as of December 31, 2015 the estimated undiscounted future cash flows exceeded the carrying values of our drilling rigs by factors ranging from 1.3x to 2.7x.

Revenue: Revenue is recognized as services are performed based on contracted dayrates and the number of operating days during the period.

In connection with a customer contract, we may receive lump-sum fees for the mobilization of equipment and personnel. Mobilization fees and costs incurred to mobilize a rig from one geographic market to another are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of such contract, excluding any option periods. Costs incurred to mobilize a rig without a contract are expensed as incurred. Fees or lump-sum payments received for capital improvements to rigs are deferred and amortized to income over the term of the related drilling contract. The costs of such capital improvements are capitalized and depreciated over the useful lives of the assets. Deferred revenues under drilling contracts were $0.0 million, $20.2 million and $72.2 million at June 30, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Deferred revenue is included in either accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet, based upon the initial term of the related drilling contract.

Rig and Equipment Certifications: We are required to obtain regulatory certifications to operate our drilling rigs and certain specified equipment and must maintain such certifications through periodic inspections and surveys. The costs associated with these certifications, including drydock costs, are deferred and amortized over the corresponding certification periods.

Income Taxes: Income taxes have been provided based upon the tax laws and rates in effect in the countries in which operations are conducted and income is earned. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in future taxable or deductible amounts and are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. We recognize interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense.

Recent Accounting Standards: See “Note 2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Our rigs operate in various international locations and thus are sometimes subject to foreign exchange risk. We may from time to time also be exposed to certain commodity price risk, equity price risk and risks related to other market driven rates or prices. The risks associated with foreign exchange rates were not significant in the first six months of 2016 or in 2015 as all of our drilling contracts have been primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The significant decline in worldwide exploration and production spending as a result of the decline in oil prices has negatively impacted the offshore contract drilling business as discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Interest Rate Risk. As of June 30, 2016, we had approximately $142.3 million face amount of variable rate debt outstanding under the 2016 Term Loan Facility. Under the 2016 Term Loan Facility, interest is payable on the unpaid principal amount of each term loan at LIBOR plus 6.5%, with a LIBOR floor of 0.5%. As of June 30, 2016, the 3-month LIBOR rate was 0.65% and the current interest rate on the 2016 Term Loan Facility is 7.15%. Increases in the LIBOR rate would impact the amount of interest that we are required to pay on these borrowings. For every 1% increase in LIBOR (above the LIBOR floor) we would be subject to an increase in interest expense of $1.4 million per annum based on June 30, 2016 outstanding principal amounts. We have not entered into any interest rate hedges or swaps with regard to either of the term loans.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk. As we operate in international areas, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk. Our primary foreign exchange risk management strategy involves structuring customer contracts to provide for payment in both U.S. dollars, which is our functional currency, and local currency. The payment portion denominated in local currency is based on anticipated local currency requirements over the contract term. Due to various factors, including customer acceptance, local banking laws, other statutory requirements, local currency convertibility and the impact of inflation on local costs, actual foreign exchange needs may vary from those anticipated in the customer contracts, resulting in partial exposure to foreign exchange risk. Fluctuations in foreign currencies have not had a material impact on our overall results. If we find ourselves in situations where payments of local currency do not equal local currency requirements, foreign exchange derivative instruments, specifically foreign exchange forward contracts, or spot purchases, may be used to mitigate foreign currency risk. A foreign exchange forward contract obligates us to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at specified exchange rates on specified dates or to make an equivalent U.S. dollar payment equal to the value of such exchange. We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2016, we did not have any open foreign exchange derivative contracts or material foreign currency exposure risk.

BUSINESS

Our Company

The Company was previously known as Offshore Group Investment Limited and changed its corporate name to Vantage Drilling International effective February 11, 2016.

Restructuring Agreement and Bankruptcy Proceedings under Chapter 11

On December 1, 2015, we and Vantage Drilling Company (“VDC”), entered into a restructuring support agreement (the “Restructuring Agreement”) with a majority of our secured creditors. Pursuant to the terms of the Restructuring Agreement, the Company agreed to pursue a pre-packaged plan of reorganization (the “Plan of Reorganization”) under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and VDC would commence official liquidation proceedings under the laws of the Cayman Islands. On December 2, 2015, pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement, the Company acquired two subsidiaries responsible for the management of the Company from VDC in exchange for a $61.5 million promissory note (the “VDC Note”).

On December 3, 2015, the Company and 24 debtor subsidiaries, including five debtor subsidiaries of VDC who were guarantors of the Company’s pre-bankruptcy secured debt, filed the Plan of Reorganization in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (In re Vantage Drilling International (F/K/A Offshore Group Investment Limited), et al., Case No. 15-12422). On January 15, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware confirmed the Company’s Plan of Reorganization and the Company emerged from bankruptcy effective February 10, 2016. The significant elements of the Plan of Reorganization included:

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Company entered into the Credit Agreement providing for (i) a $32.0 million revolving letter of credit facility to replace the Company’s existing $32.0 million revolving letter of credit commitment under its pre-petition credit facility and (ii) $143.0 million of term loans into which the claims of the lenders under the Company’s pre-petition credit facility were converted. The lenders under the Company’s pre-petition credit facility also received $7.0 million in cash under the Plan of Reorganization.

10% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes. The Company engaged in a rights offering for $75.0 million of new 10% Second Lien Notes for certain holders of its secured debt claims. In connection with this rights offering, certain creditors entered into a “backstop” agreement to purchase 10% Second Lien Notes if the offer was not fully subscribed. The premium paid to such creditors under the backstop agreement was approximately $2.2 million, paid $1.1 million in cash and $1.1 million in additional 10% Second Lien Notes, resulting in a total issued amount of $76.1 million of 10% Second Lien Notes, and raising $73.9 million, after deducting the cash portion of the backstop premium.

1%/12% Step-Up Senior Secured Third Lien Convertible Notes. The Company issued 4,344,959 New Shares and approximately $750.0 million of Notes to certain creditors holding approximately $2.5 billion of pre-petition secured debt claims. The Ordinary Shares issued to these creditors and the Notes are stapled together (the “Stapled Securities”) and may only be traded together and not separately. The Notes are convertible into New Shares in certain circumstances, at a conversion price (subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Indenture) which was $95.60 as of the issue date. The Indenture includes customary covenants that restrict the granting of liens and customary events of default, including, among other things, failure to issue securities upon conversion of the Notes.

VDC Note. Effective with the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy, VDC’s former equity interest in the Company was cancelled. Immediately following that event, the VDC Note was converted into 655,094 Ordinary Shares in accordance with the terms thereof, in satisfaction of the obligation thereunder, which, including accrued interest, totaled approximately $62.0 million as of such date.

Drilling

Jackups

A jackup rig is a mobile, self-elevating drilling platform equipped with legs that are lowered to the ocean floor until a foundation is established for support, at which point the hull is raised out of the water into position to conduct drilling and workover operations. All of our jackup rigs were built at PPL Shipyard in Singapore. The design of our jackup rigs is the Baker Marine Pacific Class 375. These units are ultra-premium jackup rigs with independent legs capable of drilling in up to 375 feet of water, a cantilever drilling floor and a total drilling depth capacity of approximately 30,000 feet.

Drillships

Drillships are self-propelled and suited for drilling in remote locations because of their mobility and large load carrying capacity. All of our drillships are dynamically positioned and designed for drilling in water depths of up to 12,000 feet, with a total vertical drilling depth capacity of up to 40,000 feet. The drillships’ hull design has a variable deck load of approximately 20,000 tons and measures approximately 781 feet long by 137 feet wide. All of our drillships were built at Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering shipyard in South Korea.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our offshore drilling fleet as of July 29, 2016.


Name	Year Built		Water Depth Rating (feet)		Drilling Depth Capacity (feet)		Location		Status
Jackups
Emerald Driller		2008		375		30,000		Malaysia		Mobilizing
Sapphire Driller		2009		375		30,000		West Africa		Warm Stacked
Aquamarine Driller		2009		375		30,000		Malaysia		Operating
Topaz Driller		2009		375		30,000		Indonesia		Warm Stacked
Drillships
Platinum Explorer		2010		12,000		40,000		Malaysia		Warm Stacked
Titanium Explorer		2012		12,000		40,000		South Africa		Warm Stacked
Tungsten Explorer		2013		12,000		40,000		Congo		Operating

Strengths

We believe our primary competitive strengths include the following:

Premium fleet. Our fleet is currently comprised of seven ultra-premium high specification drilling units: four jackup rigs and three drillships. We believe the Emerald Driller, Sapphire Driller, Aquamarine Driller and Topaz Driller are ultra-premium jackup rigs due to their ability to drill in deeper depths, as well as their enhanced operational efficiency and technical capabilities when compared to a majority of the current global jackup rig fleet, which is primarily comprised of older, smaller, less capable rigs using less modern technology. The Platinum Explorer, Titanium Explorer and Tungsten Explorer are ultra-deepwater drillships that are designed to drill in up to 12,000 feet of water. Our drillships are currently equipped to drill in water depths of up to 10,000 feet. We believe 10,000 feet to be the upper-limit water depth currently being developed by leading offshore exploration and production companies, though we also believe that they are evaluating future deepwater development projects in water depths in excess of 10,000 feet.

Strategy

Our strategy includes:

Our Industry

The offshore contract drilling industry provides drilling, workover and well construction services to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies through the use of mobile offshore drilling units. Historically, the offshore drilling industry has been very cyclical with periods of high demand, limited rig supply and high dayrates alternating with periods of low demand, excess rig supply and low dayrates. Periods of low demand and excess rig supply intensify the competition in the industry and often result in some rigs becoming idle for long periods of time. As is common throughout the oilfield services industry, offshore drilling is largely driven by actual or anticipated changes in oil and natural gas prices and capital spending by companies exploring for and producing oil and natural gas. Sustained high commodity prices historically have led to increases in expenditures for offshore drilling

activities and, as a result, greater demand for our services. Due to a recent decline in the price of oil and gas there has been a reduced demand for offshore drilling rigs by our customers. The reduced demand is occurring at the same time that a significant number of drilling rigs are scheduled for delivery resulting in an oversupply of equipment. We expect that these adverse market conditions are likely to continue for the duration of 2016 and 2017.

Offshore drilling rigs are generally marketed on a worldwide basis as rigs can be moved from one region to another. The cost of moving a rig and the availability of rig-moving vessels may cause the supply and demand balance to vary between regions. However, significant variations between regions do not tend to exist long-term because of rig mobility.

The offshore drilling market generally consists of shallow water (<400 ft.), midwater (>400 ft.), deepwater (>4,000 ft.) and ultra-deepwater (>7,500 ft.). The global shallow water market is serviced primarily by jackups.

Our jackup fleet is focused on the “long-legged” (350+ ft.) high specification market. The drillships that we operate are focused on the ultra-deepwater segment, but can operate in the midwater and deepwater markets as well.

Customers

Our customers are primarily large multinational oil and natural gas companies, government owned oil and natural gas companies and independent oil and natural gas producers. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the following customers accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenue:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
Total E&P Congo		32	%		—			—
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation		25	%		24	%		28	%
Petrobras America Inc.		20	%		—			24	%
Olio Energy Sdn Bhd (1)		—			18	%		—
Ophir Energy		—			17	%		—
Perenco Oil and Gas		—			14	%		—

(1)	Olio Energy Sdn Bhd is a contracting party through which we operate for Petronas Carigali, a subsidiary of the national oil company of Malaysia.

Drilling Contracts

Our drilling contracts are the result of negotiation with our customers, and most contracts are awarded through competitive bidding against other contractors. Drilling contracts generally provide for payment on a dayrate basis, with higher rates while the drilling unit is operating and lower rates for periods of mobilization or when drilling operations are interrupted or restricted by equipment breakdowns, adverse environmental conditions or other conditions beyond our control. Currently all of our drilling contracts are on a dayrate basis. A dayrate drilling contract generally extends over a period of time covering either the drilling of a single well or group of wells or covering a stated term. Certain of our contracts with customers may be cancelable at the option of the customer upon payment of an early termination fee. Such payments may not, however, fully compensate us for the loss of the contract. Contracts also customarily provide for either automatic termination or termination at the option of the customer typically without the payment of any termination fee, under various circumstances such as non-performance, in the event of extensive downtime or impaired performance caused by equipment or operational issues, or sustained periods of downtime due to force majeure events. Many of these events are beyond our control. The contract term in some instances may be extended by the client exercising options for the drilling of additional wells or for an additional term. Our contracts also typically include a provision that allows the client to extend the contract to finish drilling a well-in-progress. During periods of depressed market conditions, our clients may seek to renegotiate drilling contracts to reduce their obligations or may seek to repudiate their contracts. Suspension of drilling contracts will result in the reduction in or loss of dayrate for the period of the suspension. If our customers cancel some of our contracts and we are unable to secure new contracts on a timely basis and on substantially similar terms, if contracts are suspended for an extended period of time or if a number of our contracts are renegotiated, it could adversely affect our consolidated statements of financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the current contract status of our offshore drilling fleet as of August 15, 2016.


Name	Region	Estimated Contract End Date		Customer
Aquamarine Driller	Southeast Asia		Q2 2017	CPOC
Emerald Driller	Middle East		Q1 2018	Total E&P Qatar
Tungsten Explorer	West Africa		Q4 2018	Total E&P Congo

Contract Backlog

As of August 15, 2016, our owned fleet had total contract backlog of approximately $284.0 million. We expect that approximately $55.4 million of our total contract backlog will be performed during the remainder of 2016, with the remainder performed in subsequent years.

Competition

The contract drilling industry is highly competitive. Demand for contract drilling and related services is influenced by a number of factors, including the current and expected prices of oil and natural gas and the expenditures of oil and natural gas companies for exploration and development of oil and natural gas. In addition, demand for drilling services remains dependent on a variety of political and economic factors beyond our control, including worldwide demand for oil and natural gas, the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, to set and maintain production levels and pricing, the level of production of non-OPEC countries and the policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of their oil and natural gas reserves.

Drilling contracts are generally awarded on a competitive bid or negotiated basis. Pricing is often the primary factor in determining which qualified contractor is awarded a job. Rig availability, capabilities, age and each contractor’s safety performance record and reputation for quality also can be key factors in the determination. Operators also may consider crew experience, rig location and efficiency. We believe that the market for drilling contracts will continue to be highly competitive for the foreseeable future. Certain competitors may have greater financial resources than we do, which may better enable them to withstand periods of low utilization, compete more effectively in a low price environment, build new rigs or acquire existing rigs.

Our competition ranges from large international companies offering a wide range of drilling and other oilfield services to smaller, locally owned companies. Competition for rigs is usually on a global basis, as these rigs are highly mobile and may be moved, at a cost that is sometimes substantial, from one region to another in response to demand.

Operating Hazards

Our operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the offshore drilling business, including, but not limited to: blowouts, craterings, fires, explosions, equipment failures, loss of well control, loss of hole, damaged or lost equipment and damage or loss from inclement weather or natural disasters.

These hazards could cause personal injury or death, serious damage to or destruction of property and equipment, suspension of drilling operations, or damage to the environment, including damage to producing formations and surrounding areas. Generally, we seek to obtain contractual indemnification from our customers for some of these risks. To the extent not transferred to customers by contract, we seek protection against some of these risks through insurance, including property casualty insurance on our rigs and drilling equipment, protection and indemnity, commercial general liability, which has coverage extension for underground resources and equipment coverage, commercial contract indemnity and commercial umbrella insurance.

There are risks that are outside of our control. Nonetheless, we believe that we are adequately insured for liability and property damage to others with respect to our operations. However, such insurance may not be sufficient to protect us against liability for all consequences of well disasters, extensive fire damage or damage to the environment. For more, see “Risk Factors—Our business involves numerous operating hazards, and our insurance and contractual indemnity rights may not be adequate to cover our losses.”

Insurance

We maintain insurance coverage that includes coverage for physical damage, third party liability, employer’s liability, loss of hire, war risk, general liability, vessel pollution and other coverage. However, our insurance is subject to exclusions and limitations and there is no assurance that such coverage will adequately protect us against liability from all potential consequences and damages.

Our primary marine package provides for hull and machinery coverage for our drilling units up to a scheduled value for each asset, which we believe approximates replacement cost. The maximum coverage for our seven drilling units is $1.4 billion. The policies are subject to certain exclusions, limitations, deductibles and other conditions. Deductibles for physical damage to our jackup rigs and our drillships are $2.5 million and $5.0 million, respectively, per occurrence. Our protection and indemnity policy provides liability coverage limits of $500 million per rig. In addition to these policies, we have separate policies providing coverage for onshore general liability, employer’s liability, auto liability and non-owned aircraft liability, with customary coverage, limits and deductibles.

Foreign Regulation

Our operations are conducted primarily in foreign jurisdictions and are subject to, and affected in varying degrees by, governmental laws and regulations in countries in which we operate, including laws and regulations relating to the importation of and operation of drilling units, currency conversions and repatriation, oil and natural gas exploration and development, environmental protection, taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel, the use of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors and duties on the importation and exportation of drilling units and other equipment. Governments in some foreign countries have become increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership of concessions and companies holding concessions, the exploration for oil and natural gas and other aspects of the oil and natural gas industries in their countries. In some areas of the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the amount of exploration and development work done by major oil and natural gas companies and may continue to do so. Furthermore, these regulations have limited the opportunities for international drilling contracts to participate in tenders for contracts or to perform services in certain countries as the governments have strongly favored local service providers. Operations in less developed countries may be subject to legal systems that are not as predictable as those in more developed countries, which can lead to greater uncertainty in legal matters and proceedings.

Anti-Money Laundering

If any person resident in the Cayman Islands knows or suspects or has reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting that another person is engaged in criminal conduct or is involved with terrorism or terrorist property and the information for that knowledge or suspicion came to their attention in the course of business in the regulated sector, or other trade, profession, business or employment, the person will be required to report such knowledge or suspicion to (i) the Financial Reporting Authority of the Cayman Islands, pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime Law (2014 Revision) of the Cayman Islands if the disclosure relates to criminal conduct or money laundering, or (ii) a police officer of the rank of constable or higher, or the Financial Reporting Authority, pursuant to the Terrorism Law (2015 Revision) of the Cayman Islands, if the disclosure relates to involvement with terrorism or terrorist financing and property. Such a report shall not be treated as a breach of confidence or of any restriction upon the disclosure of information imposed by any enactment or otherwise.

Environmental Regulation

For a discussion of the effects of environmental regulation on our current operations, see “Risk Factors—Our business is subject to numerous governmental laws and regulations, including those that may impose significant costs and liability on us for environmental and natural resource damages.” We anticipate that we will continue to make expenditures to comply with environmental requirements. To date, we have not expended material amounts beyond those amounts spent on our basic rig designs in order to comply and we do not believe that our compliance with such requirements will have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations or competitive position or materially increase our capital expenditures.

Heightened environmental concerns in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico have led to greater and more stringent environmental regulation, higher drilling costs, and a more difficult and lengthy well permitting process. In the United States, requirements applicable to our operations include regulations that require us to obtain and maintain specified permits or governmental approvals, control the discharge of materials into the environment, require removal and cleanup of materials that may harm the environment, or otherwise relate to the protection of the environment. Laws and regulations protecting the environment have become more stringent and may in some cases impose strict liability, rendering a person liable for environmental damage without regard to negligence or fault on the part of such person. Some of these laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions caused by others or for acts which were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time they were performed. The application of these requirements or the adoption of new or more stringent requirements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of pollutants, including petroleum, into the navigable waters of the United States without a permit. The regulations implementing the Clean Water Act require permits to be obtained by an operator before discharge from specified exploration activities occurs. Certain facilities that store or otherwise handle oil are required to prepare and implement Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plans and Facility Response Plans relating to the possible discharge of oil to surface waters. Violations of monitoring, reporting, permitting and other requirements can result in the imposition of administrative, civil and criminal penalties.

The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) and related regulations impose a variety of requirements on “responsible parties” related to the prevention of oil spills and liability for damages resulting from such spills. A “responsible party” includes the owners or operator of a facility or vessel, or the lessee or permittee of the area in which an offshore facility is located. OPA assigns liability to each responsible party for oil removal costs and a variety of public and private damages. While liability limits apply in some circumstances, a party cannot take advantage of liability limits if the spill was caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct or resulted from violation of a federal safety, construction or operating regulation. If the party fails to report a spill or to cooperate fully in the cleanup, liability limits likewise do not apply. OPA establishes a liability limit for offshore facilities of all removal costs plus $75.0 million, and a lesser limit for some vessels depending on their size. Few defenses exist to the liability imposed by OPA, and the liability could be substantial. Failure to comply with ongoing requirements or inadequate cooperation in the event of a spill could subject a responsible party to administrative, civil or criminal enforcement actions. Congress has been urged to consider changes to OPA that would increase or eliminate the limits on liability and companion bills that would eliminate the $75.0 million liability limit have been referred to various committees of Congress. OPA requires owners and operators of certain vessels to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility. Vessel owners and operators may evidence their financial responsibility by showing proof of insurance, surety bond, self-insurance or financial guaranty.

Laws governing air emissions and solid and hazardous waste also apply to our operations. The U.S. Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act authorizes regulations relating to safety and environmental protection applicable to lessees and permittees operating on the outer continental shelf. Included among these are regulations that require the preparation of spill contingency plans and establishment of air quality standards for certain pollutants, including particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides. Specific design and operational standards may apply to outer continental shelf vessels, rigs, platforms, vehicles and structures. Violations of lease conditions or regulations related to the environment issued pursuant to the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act can result in substantial civil and criminal penalties, as well as potential court injunctions curtailing operations and canceling leases. Such enforcement liabilities can result from either governmental or citizen prosecution.

In recent years, a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security were adopted to address terrorism risks, including the U.S. Coast Guard regulations implementing the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002. These regulations require, among other things, the development of vessel security plans and on-board installation of automatic information systems, or AIS, to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications.

The United States is one of approximately 165 member countries to the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”), a specialized agency of the United Nations that is responsible for developing measures to improve the safety and security of international shipping and to prevent marine pollution from ships. Among the various international conventions negotiated by the IMO is the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (“MARPOL”). MARPOL imposes environmental standards on the shipping industry relating to oil spills, management of garbage, the handling and disposal of noxious liquids, harmful substances in packaged forms, sewage and air emissions.

Annex VI to MARPOL sets limits on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances. Annex VI also imposes a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and allows for specialized areas to be established internationally with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. For vessels 400 gross tons and greater, platforms and drilling units, Annex VI imposes various survey and certification requirements. For this purpose, gross tonnage is based on the International Tonnage Certificate for the vessel. The United States has ratified Annex VI. In addition, any drilling units we operate internationally are subject to the requirements of Annex VI in those countries that have implemented its provisions. We believe the drilling units we currently offer for international projects comply with Annex VI, but changes to our equipment and ratifying countries’ regulatory interpretations of the Annex VI requirements could impose additional costs on us, which could be significant.

Although significant capital expenditures may be required to comply with these governmental laws and regulations, such compliance has not materially adversely affected our earnings or competitive position. We believe that we are currently in compliance in all material respects with the environmental regulations to which we are subject.

Employees

At July 30, 2016, we managed a workforce of approximately 564 people, of which 349 were our direct employees.

Properties

We maintain offices, land bases and other facilities in several worldwide locations, including our principal executive offices in Houston, Texas, regional operational office in Singapore and a marketing office in Dubai. We lease all of these facilities.

Legal Proceedings

We may be involved in litigation, claims and disputes incidental to our business, which may involve claims for significant monetary amounts, some of which would not be covered by insurance. In the opinion of management, none of the existing disputes to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2015, we became aware of media reports that Hamylton Padilha, the Brazilian agent the Company used in the contracting of the Titanium Explorer drillship to Petroleo Brasileiro S.A., had entered into a plea arrangement with the Brazilian authorities in connection with his role in facilitating the payment of bribes to former Petrobras executives. Among other things, Mr. Padilha provided information to the Brazilian authorities of an alleged bribery scheme between former Petrobras executives and Mr. Su who was, at the time of the alleged bribery scheme, a member of the Board of Directors and a significant shareholder of our predecessor company, Vantage Drilling Company. When we learned of Mr. Padilha’s plea agreement and the allegations, we voluntarily contacted the DOJ and the SEC to advise them of these recent developments, as well as the fact that we had engaged outside counsel to conduct an internal investigation of the allegations. Our internal investigation is ongoing and we are cooperating with the DOJ and SEC in their investigation of these allegations. In connection with our cooperation with the DOJ and SEC, we recently advised both agencies that in early 2010, we engaged outside counsel to investigate a report of allegations of improper payments to customs and immigration officials in Asia. That investigation was concluded in 2011, and we determined at that time that no disclosure was warranted; however, in an abundance of caution, we are reviewing the matter again in light of the allegations in the Petrobras matter. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, if the DOJ or the SEC determine that violations of the FCPA have occurred, the Company could be subject to civil and criminal sanctions, including monetary penalties, as well as additional requirements or changes to our business practices and compliance programs, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Additionally, if we become subject to any judgment, decree, order, governmental penalty or fine, this may constitute an event of default under the terms of our secured debt agreements and result in our outstanding debt becoming immediately due and payable.

On August 31, 2015, VDC received notice from Petrobras America, Inc. (“PAI”) and Petrobras Venezuela Investments & Services B.V. (“PVIS”) stating that PAI and PVIS were terminating the Agreement for the Provision of Drilling Services dated February 4, 2009 (the “Drilling Contract”). The Drilling Contract was initially entered into between PVIS and Vantage Deepwater Company, one of our wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries, and was later novated by PVIS to PAI and by Vantage Deepwater Company to Vantage Deepwater Drilling, Inc., another of our wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries. The notice stated that PAI and PVIS were terminating the Drilling Contract because Vantage had allegedly breached its obligations under the agreement. Under the terms of the Drilling Contract we initiated arbitration proceedings before the American Arbitration Association on August 31, 2015, challenging PVIS and PAI’s wrongful attempt to terminate the Drilling Contract. Vantage has maintained that it complied with all of its obligations under the Drilling Contract and that PVIS and PAI’s attempt to terminate the agreement is both improper and a breach of the Drilling Contract.

In the ongoing arbitration proceeding, the parties have exchanged initial pleadings and have confirmed an arbitral tribunal. Vantage has asserted claims against PAI and PVIS for declaratory relief and monetary damages based on breach of contract. Vantage has also asserted a claim against Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“PBP”) to enforce a guaranty provided by PBP. The Petrobras entities (PVIS, PAI, and PBP) have asserted that the Drilling Contract is void as illegally procured, that PVIS and PBP are not proper parties to the arbitration, and that PAI and PVIS properly terminated the contract. PAI has further counterclaimed for attorneys’ fees and costs alleging that Vantage failed to negotiate in good faith before commencing arbitration proceedings. Vantage denies that any of the claims or defenses asserted by the Petrobras entities have merit and intends to vigorously pursue its claims in the arbitration proceeding.

MANAGEMENT

Board of Directors and Executive Officers

The names of our directors and executive officers, their ages as of August 15, 2016 and certain other information about them are set forth below:


Name	Age	Position
Thomas R. Bates, Jr. (1)	67	Chairman of the Board of Directors
Matthew W. Bonanno (2)	37	Director
Esa Ikaheimonen(1)	52	Director
Nils E. Larsen (1)	45	Director
Scott McCarty (2)	43	Director
L. Spencer Wells (2)	46	Director
Ihab Toma (3)	52	Director and Chief Executive Officer
Douglas G. Smith	48	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Douglas W. Halkett	56	Chief Operating Officer
Edward G. Brantley	61	Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
William L. Thomson	46	Vice President - Marketing and Technical Services
Linda J. Ibrahim	45	Vice President of Tax and Governmental Compliance
Douglas E. Stewart	39	Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

(1)	Member of our Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”).

(2)	Member of our Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”).

(3)	Appointments effective August 29, 2016.

Board of Directors

Thomas R. Bates, Jr. has served as our Chairman of the Board since February 10, 2016. Qualifications and Experience: Dr. Bates has over 40 years of operational experience in the oil and gas industry, having held executive leadership positions at several major energy companies. He is currently an adjunct professor and co-chair of the advisory board for the Energy MBA Program at the Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth. Dr. Bates joined Lime Rock Management LP, an energy focused private equity firm, as managing director in 2001 and became a senior advisor of the firm in 2010 before retiring in 2013. Dr. Bates previously served as group president at Baker Hughes from 1998 through 2000, chief executive officer at Weatherford-Enterra from 1997 to 1998, and spent 15 years in management positions at Schlumberger, finishing as president of the Anadrill division where he was responsible for the introduction of new products and technologies. Dr. Bates began his career at Shell Oil Company. Through his experience in both energy and oilfield service companies, Dr. Bates provides significant insight into management and corporate strategy, including audit committee matters, that we believe are essential for growing the Company. His experience in private equity provides valuable entrepreneurial insight. Additionally, Dr. Bates has significant experience sitting on compensation and audit committees providing us with insight into corporate governance and other matters. Education: Dr. Bates has a doctorate in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan.

Directorships for the past five years: Independence Contract Drilling (Chairman 2011 to the present), TETRA Technologies (2011 to the present), Alacer Gold Corporation (2014 to the present), Hercules Offshore Company (2004 to 2015; Chairman 2009 to 2015).

Matthew W. Bonanno has served as a director of the Company since February 10, 2016. Qualifications and Experience: Mr. Bonanno is currently a partner at York Capital Management where he joined in 2010. York Capital Management is a shareholder of the Company. Mr. Bonanno previously worked at the Blackstone Group from 2007 to 2010 where he focused on restructuring, recapitalization and reorganization transactions. Prior to joining the Blackstone Group, Mr. Bonanno worked on financing and strategic transactions at News Corporation from 2003 to 2005 and as an investment banker at JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs. Mr. Bonanno’s significant experience in financing transactions and investing across multiple industries provides us with valuable strategic insight. Education: Mr. Bonanno received a B.A. in History from Georgetown University and an Masters of Business Administration in Finance from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Directorships for the past five years: Rever Offshore AS (2013 to present), Stallion Oilfield Services (2013 to 2015), and ABY Group Holdings (2013 to present).

Esa Ikaheimonen has served as a director of the Company since February 10, 2016. Qualifications and Experience: Mr. Ikaheimonen served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Transocean Ltd., an offshore drilling contractor from 2012 to 2015. He was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Seadrill Ltd., an offshore drilling contractor from 2010 to 2012. From 2009 to 2010, Mr. Ikaheimonen served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Poyry PLC, a global consulting and engineering company. Prior to Poyry, he was employed by Royal Dutch Shell for almost 20 years where he held several senior positions including Regional Vice President Finance for Upstream in both Africa and the Middle-East, Finance and Commercial Director in Qatar, and Downstream Finance Director for Scandinavia. Mr. Ikaheimonen’s background and experience provide us with significant managerial insight into the offshore drilling business and strategic focus on our customers. Additionally, Mr. Ikaheimonen has experience sitting on an audit committee which provides insight into financial processes and controls. Education: Mr. Ikaheimonen earned a Master’s Degree in Law from the University of Turku in Finland, specializing in Tax Law and Tax Planning. Mr. Ikaheimonen will serve as chairman of the Audit Committee.

Directorships for the past five years: Transocean Partners, LLC (Chairman 2014 to 2015), and Ahlstrom Plc (2011 to 2015)

Nils E. Larsen has served as a director of the Company since February 10, 2016. Qualifications and Experience: Mr. Larsen began working with The Carlyle Group’s U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund in 2013 and is currently an Operating Adviser. Prior to partnering with The Carlyle Group, Mr. Larsen served in a variety of senior executive positions with Tribune Company from 2008 to 2013, including as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Tribune Broadcasting and as the Co-President of Tribune Company. Before joining Tribune Company, Mr. Larsen was employed by Equity Group Investments, LLC from 1995 to 2008 (serving as a Managing Director from 2001 to 2008) and again from 2013 to present, focusing on investments in the media, transportation, energy, retail grocery and member loyalty and rewards sectors. Mr. Larsen started his career at CS First Boston where he focused on the capital requirements and derivative products needs of U.S. financial institutions and non-U.S. based entities. Mr. Larsen has significant governance experience in post-bankrupt entities providing this essential insight to the Company. Education: Mr. Larsen received his A.B. summa cum laude from Bowdoin College.

Directorships for the past five years: Liberty Tire Recycling (Chairman 2015 to present), Rewards Network (2013 to present), Extreme Reach (2015 to present), More FM (2015 to present), Talent Partners (Chairman 2014 to 2015), Media Properties Holdings (2014 to 2016), Classified Ventures (2009 to 2013), Chicago Cubs Baseball Holdings (2009 to 2013), Newsday Holdings (2008 to 2013) and TV Food Network Holdings (2008 to 2013).

Scott McCarty has served as a director of the Company since February 15, 2016. Qualifications and Experience: Mr. McCarty joined Q Investments in 2002 and is currently a partner managing private equity and distressed investment groups within Q Investments. Affiliates of Q Investments are shareholders of the Company. Previously within Q Investments, Mr. McCarty was a portfolio manager. Before joining Q Investments, Mr. McCarty was a captain in the United States Army and worked in the office of U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison. Mr. McCarty has significant investment experience across industries and working with distressed investments and provides valuable insight to our Board of Directors regarding the structuring of the organization and streamlining operations. Education: Mr. McCarty graduated with a Bachelors of Science degree from the United States Military Academy at West Point, where he was a Distinguished Cadet and recipient of the General Lee Donne Olvey Award, and earned an Masters of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

Directorships for the past five years: Travelport Worldwide (Compensation Committee 2013-2014), Envirotest Systems Holdings Corp. (2007-2014) and Q-TZG Leasing Holding Ltd (2013 to present).

Ihab Toma will serve as a member of the Board of Directors and as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective August 29, 2016. Qualifications and Experience: Mr. Toma has over 30 years of experience in the oilfield industry. Since 2014, Mr. Toma has been serving as a senior advisor to First Reserve Corporation, a leading global private equity and infrastructure firm exclusively focused on energy. Prior to joining First Reserve Corporation, Mr. Toma served from 2009 until 2013 in various executive capacities at Transocean, as Executive Vice President - Chief of Staff, Executive Vice President - Operations, Executive Vice President - Global Business and Senior Vice President - Marketing and Planning. Prior to his time at Transocean, from 1986 until 2009, Mr. Toma served in multiple capacities at Schlumberger. He served as Vice President, Sales and Marketing for Europe, Africa and Caspian for Schlumberger Oilfield Services from April 2006 to August 2009. From 2000 to 2006, he led Schlumberger’s Information Solutions business in various capacities, including President, Vice President - Sales and Marketing, Vice President – Information Management and Vice President – Europe, Africa and CIS Operations. Mr. Toma began his career with Schlumberger in 1986. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering from Cairo University, Egypt.

Directorships in the past five years: Drilling Systems (UK) Ltd. (June 2015 to the present), Paradigm Geophysical Corp (October 2013 to the present), AGR Group (Vice Chairman from January 2015 to the present) and Engström & Engstöm (Chairman from May 2014 to the present).

L. Spencer Wells has served as a director of the Company since February 10, 2016. Qualifications and Experience: Mr. Wells is a founder and partner of Drivetrain Advisors, a provider of fiduciary services to the alternative investment community, with a particular expertise in restructuring and turnarounds. From 2010 to 2013,

Mr. Wells served as a senior advisor and partner with TPG Special Situations Partners where he helped manage a $2.5B portfolio of liquid and illiquid distressed credit investments. Mr. Wells served as a partner at Silverpoint Capital from 2002 to 2009 where he managed a $1.3B investment portfolio consisting primarily of stressed and distressed bank loans and bonds focusing on the oil and gas exploration and production, oilfield services, power generation, financial institutions and chemicals industries. He previously served as an analyst on the distressed debt trading desks at Union Bank of Switzerland, Deutsche Bank and Bankers Trust. Mr. Wells’ significant experience in the debt, equity and capital markets provides the Board of Directors with insight into operating the Company following our Plan of Reorganization. Mr. Wells also has significant experience serving on private and public companies’ boards, which gives him insight into matters regarding corporate governance and fiduciary responsibilities. Education: Mr. Wells received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Wesleyan University and his Masters of Business Administration from the Columbia Business School. Mr. Wells will serve as the chairman of the Compensation Committee.

Directorships for the past five years: Center for Music National Service (2011 to 2014), Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. (Chairman 2014 to present), Syncora Holdings, Ltd. (2014 to present), Preferred Proppants LLC (2014 to present), Navig8 Crude Tankers, Inc. (2014 to 2015), Alinta Holdings (2013), Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (Chairman 2015 to present), Global Geophysical Services, Inc. (Chairman 2015 to present), Town Sports International Holdings, Inc. (2015 to present) and Certus Holdings, Inc. and CertusBank, N.A (2014 to present)

Executive Officers

Effective March 21, 2016, Paul A. Bragg resigned as the President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company. Mr. Bragg also resigned as a member of our Board of Directors. The Company formed an Office of the Chief Executive to take over all duties related to the chief executive officer of the Company, consisting of Douglas G. Smith, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, Douglas W. Halkett, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and Robert Tamburrino, who at the time was the Chief Restructuring Officer of the Company. Effective June 23, 2016, Mr. Tamburrino resigned as Chief Restructuring Officer and from the office of the Chief Executive Officer and all other offices of the Company and its subsidiaries. Mr. Ihab Tama’s appointment as Chief Executive Officer, effective August 29, 2016, terminates the office of the Chief Executive.

Vantage Energy Services, Inc., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, had entered into an Advisory Services Letter with Renegade Swish, LLC (an affiliate of Q Investments) dated April 7, 2016 in which Renegade Swish had agreed to provide to us the services of Mr. Tamburrino on an interim basis as our Chief Restructuring Officer. We agreed to pay Renegade Swish an hourly rate of $765 for Mr. Tamburrino’s services and to reimburse Renegade Swish for all reasonable third party reimbursable expenses. Mr. McCarty, a current member of our Board of Directors, is also employed by Renegade Swish, LLC.

With respect to all of the following officers, references to offices held by such individuals in the following paragraphs are to offices with Vantage Drilling Company prior to the effectiveness of the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings on February 10, 2016 and to offices with the Company after February 10, 2016.

Douglas G. Smith has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since November 2007 and has served as a member of the Office of Chief Executive from March 2016 through August 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Smith served with Pride as Vice President—Financial Projects from January 2007 to June 2007, as Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from May 2004 to December 2006, and Director of Budget and Strategic Planning from March 2003 to May 2004. Mr. Smith is a certified public accountant and has a Bachelor’s of Business Administration and a Masters of Professional Accounting degree from the University of Texas.

Douglas W. Halkett has served as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2008 and has served as a member of the Office of Chief Executive from March 2016 through August 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Halkett served with Transocean Inc. as Division Manager in Northern Europe (UK & Norway) from January 2004 to November 2007, as an Operations Manager in the Gulf of Mexico from February 2001 to December 2003, and as Operations Manager and Regional Operations Manager in the UK from July 1996 to January 2001. Prior to joining Transocean, Mr. Halkett worked for Forasol-Foramer in various operational and business roles from January 1988 to June 1996, and was assigned in Paris and various locations in the Far East. Mr. Halkett started his career with Shell International in Holland and Brunei in 1982 and joined Mobil North Sea Ltd in 1985. Mr. Halkett earned a First Class Honours Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Heriot Watt University (Edinburgh) in 1981 and attended the Program for Management Development at Harvard Business School in 2003.

Edward G. Brantley has served as our Chief Accounting Officer and Controller since April 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. Brantley served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Transmeridian Exploration Incorporated, an international exploration and production company, from 2005 to 2008. Prior to joining Transmeridian, Mr. Brantley was employed by Pride from 2000 to 2005 where he served in several capacities including Treasurer and Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining Pride, Mr. Brantley was employed by Baker Hughes, Inc., an international oilfield services provider, for 11 years in various positions including Vice President—Finance of Baker Sand Control and Controller of Baker Hughes Inteq. Mr. Brantley is a certified public accountant and graduated from the University of Mississippi with a B.B.A. in Accounting.

William L. Thomson has served as our Vice President-Marketing and Technical Services since March 2008. Prior to joining us, Mr. Thomson worked for Transocean, and predecessor companies, beginning in 1994, where, in addition to other roles, Mr. Thomson served as Operations Manager - Assets in the United Kingdom sector of the North Sea managing ten semi-submersibles and as Technical Support Manager - Africa. Additionally, Mr. Thomson worked extensively as a Project Manager responsible for various refurbishments, upgrades and new build jackup projects in shipyards in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. Mr. Thomson earned an Honours degree in Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering from the University of Strathclyde (UK) in 1992 and a PhD in Oil and Gas Law from the Robert Gordon University in 2006.

Linda J. Ibrahim has served as our Vice President of Tax and Governmental Compliance since February 2015, and has served the Company in various tax roles since 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Ibrahim was employed by Pride from 2006 to 2010, and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1999 to 2006, serving client in the energy industry. Ms. Ibrahim holds a Bachelor of Business Administration - Accounting from the University of Houston and is a certified public accountant licensed in the state of Texas.

Douglas E. Stewart has served as our Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since June 2016. Mr. Stewart joined the Company from Stallion Oilfield Services, where he served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Stewart joined Stallion in June 2007 from Occidental Development Company, a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation, where he served in the international business development group. Prior to joining Occidental in January 2007, he practiced corporate finance and securities law, specializing in private equity and mergers and acquisitions, at Vinson & Elkins LLP from September 2001 until December 31, 2006. Mr. Stewart received his B.A. from Trinity University and his J.D. from the University of Texas.

Arrangement for Nomination of Directors

Each of Messrs. Bates, Bonanno, Ikaheimonen, Larsen, and Wells was appointed to our Board of Directors by the informal ad hoc committee of our pre-petition secured creditors as part of the effectiveness of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan on February 10, 2016 by board resolution. Mr. McCarty was elected to the Board of Directors effective February 15, 2016. Messrs. Bonanno and McCarty represented their respective firms as members of such ad hoc committee.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

As a voluntary filer with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company is not currently subject to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which requires our directors, certain executive officers, and holders of more than 10% of our ordinary shares to file with the SEC reports regarding their ownership and changes in ownership of our ordinary shares.

Material Changes in Director Nominations Process

There have not been any material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees (the “Code of Conduct”). Our Code of Conduct is available at www.vantagedrilling.com on the “Corporate Governance” page under the link “Vantage Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.” We intend to include on our website any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the Code of Conduct that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or controller that relates to any element of the “code of ethics” definition contained in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K.

Audit Committee

On December 1, 2015, in connection with the commencement of the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan, the Board of Directors established the Audit Committee of the Company. The Audit Committee reviews and recommends to the Board of Directors internal accounting and financial controls and accounting principles and auditing practices to be employed in the preparation and review of our financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee has authority to engage public accountants to audit our annual financial statements and determine the scope of the audit to be undertaken by such accountants. The Audit Committee is also charged with reviewing and approving all related party transactions.

On February 10, 2016, upon the effectiveness of the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan, the newly constituted Board of Directors appointed Messrs. Ikaheimonen, Larsen and Bates to the Audit Committee with Mr. Ikaheimonen acting as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Messrs. Ikaheimonen, Larsen and Bates are considered by the Board of Directors to be independent.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Overview

The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide an explanation of our executive compensation program with respect to those individuals identified in the Summary Compensation Table below and referred to as our “named executive officers.” Prior to the effectiveness of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan on February 10, 2016, and for the entire 2015 fiscal year, our named executive officers were employed by Vantage Drilling Company, and the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vantage Drilling Company. This discussion and analysis of the executive compensation program for the 2015 fiscal year includes each named executive officer’s compensation as an officer of Vantage Drilling Company prior to the effectiveness of the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan.

Effective March 21, 2016, Paul A. Bragg resigned as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as the principal executive officer of the Company. On August 9, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Ihab Toma as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective August 29, 2016. The Company’s arrangement with Mr. Toma is described in more detail in the section titled “Employment Agreements”.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation program has reflected the philosophy that executive officers’ compensation should be closely aligned with the long-term interests of shareholders and strongly correlated with both company-wide and individual performance. Accordingly, our executive compensation program placed an emphasis on equity-based incentives and performance based compensation. The key business metrics we have historically considered in establishing targets and measuring the performance of our executive officers have included:

•

Safety performance;

•

Financial performance;

•

Customer satisfaction; and

•

Growth.

The objectives of our executive compensation program have been to attract, retain and motivate experienced, high-quality professionals to align with the long-term interests of our shareholders and to reward outstanding performance. Many of our competitors are larger, more established offshore drilling companies with greater financial resources. In order to compete with other offshore drilling companies, it is essential that we offer compensation to our executive officers competitive with our peer group.

Consistent with our philosophy and objectives, we designed a compensation program which we believed to be competitive with our peer group, and we have evaluated the mix of compensation between fixed (annual base salary) and performance-based compensation (historically annual cash incentive and long-term incentive plan awards).

The components of our compensation program include:

•

Annual Base Salary. The fixed cash component of our compensation program is used to attract and retain executives at levels intended to be competitive with our peer group.

•

Annual Cash Incentive Awards. This component of our compensation program was an annual cash payment based on our performance relative to the metrics established by the Compensation Committee and the individuals’ performance measured against his or her individual performance goals.

•

Time-vested Equity Awards. This component of our compensation program consisted of time-vested restricted shares and/or options, and was designed to encourage retention and align the executives’ interests with our shareholders.

•

Performance-based Long-Term Awards. This component of compensation consisted of performance-based restricted shares, options and/or cash and was designed to focus executives’ performance on our business and financial performance, which would generate long-term shareholder value.

•

Other Benefits. This component of our compensation program consists primarily of a match for U.S. participants in a 401(k) plan, car allowances and subsidizing employees on assignments outside their home country, including expatriate housing, schooling, home airfare and foreign taxes.

On February 10, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted and approved the Company’s new 2016 Management Incentive Plan (the “2016 MIP”) pursuant to which the Compensation Committee had the ability to grant awards to employees, directors and consultants of the Company, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the 2016 MIP, the Compensation Committee could grant awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units or other awards of the Company, subject to vesting conditions determined by the Compensation Committee. No grants were made under the 2016 MIP.

On August 9, 2016, the Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the 2016 MIP in order to better align the terms of the 2016 MIP with our overall business strategy and current operational performance (the “Amended 2016 MIP”). The Board of Directors also adopted and approved form award agreements to be used for grants under the Amended 2016 MIP, including time-based and performance-based restricted stock units to acquire units of our stapled securities. Pursuant to such form award agreements, time-based restricted stock units vest ratably annually over a four-year period, and performance-based restricted stock units vest (if at all) in accordance with a vesting schedule that is based on achievement of a multiple of “total enterprise value” of the Company as tested on the occurrence of a “qualified liquidity event” or, if later, the seventh anniversary of the date the 2016 MIP became effective. Additional awards may be granted by the Compensation Committee as soon as reasonably practicable following the Company’s receipt of proceeds from an arbitration award issued in connection with the Company’s outstanding litigation matter with Petrobras, in an amount equal to 3.25% of the net proceeds (if any) received by the Company pursuant to such litigation.

On August 9, 2016, the Board of Directors, upon the Compensation Committee’s recommendation, approved a grant to Ihab Toma of 18,543 time-based and 43,266 performance-based restricted stock units to acquire units of our stapled securities under the Amended 2016 MIP in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, as more fully described in the section titled “Employment Agreements”. This grant will become effective on August 29, 2016.

On August 24, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved additional grants of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units to acquire units of our stapled securities to certain executives of the Company, including our named executive officers. Specifically, our named executive officers received grants in the amounts shown in the table below:


Name	Time-Based RSUs		Performance- Based RSUs
Douglas G. Smith		5,151		12,018
Douglas W. Halkett		8,928		20,832
William L. Thomson		4,121		9,615

These grants will become effective on August 29, 2016.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of our directors and executive officers, as well as establishing our compensation philosophies. The Compensation Committee operates independently of management and annually seeks advice from advisors as it believes is appropriate. The Compensation Committee reviews our executive compensation program, including the allocation of the respective components of compensation.

On February 10, 2016, upon the effectiveness of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan, the newly constituted Board of Directors appointed Messrs. Bonanno and Wells to the Compensation Committee. Mr. McCarty was appointed to the Compensation Committee, effective February 15, 2016. Mr. Wells is currently acting as Chairman of the Compensation Committee.

Benchmarking of Compensation and Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee reviews the current practices of similarly-situated, publicly-held companies in the offshore drilling and oilfield services industries when it makes compensation-related decisions. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee considers the cash and equity compensation practices of other publicly-held companies that are of a similar size, or that directly compete with us in the offshore contract drilling industry, through the review of such companies’ public reports and through other resources. While benchmarking may not always be appropriate as a stand-alone tool for setting compensation due to the unique aspects of our business and objectives, the Compensation Committee gathers this information as an important part of its compensation-related decision-making process. Due to the downturn in industry conditions, the Compensation Committee froze executive compensation for 2015 and 2016; accordingly, the Compensation Committee did not utilize a compensation consultant for those periods.

Peer Group

The Compensation Committee establishes a peer group for purposes of evaluating the Company’s overall executive compensation levels and obtaining a comprehensive view of compensation practices in energy or energy-related businesses that are similar to us in size, market capitalization, revenue, nature of operations or performance, and those we compete with directly for employees. The peer group includes:


Atwood Oceanics, Inc.		Ensco plc

Diamond Offshore Drilling		Gulfmark Offshore, Inc.

Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc.		Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc.

ION Geophysical, Inc.		Noble Corp.

Parker Drilling, Inc.		Rowan Companies

Transocean		Tesco Corp

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

The compensation of our former Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers was initially established pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements. For 2015, no executive officer played a role in evaluating the compensation of the former Chief Executive Officer or the other named executive officers.

Elements of our Compensation Program

As described above, there are five primary elements to our executive compensation program—annual base salary, annual cash incentive awards, time-based equity awards, performance-based long-term incentive awards and, with respect to executives based outside of their home countries, expatriate benefits. These are described in greater detail below.

Annual Base Salary. Due to the depressed market conditions in 2015 and the Company’s restructuring efforts, the salary levels of all officers were frozen. In recognition of the fact that their base salaries and overall compensation had been below 75% of the market median for a prolonged period of time, the 2014 base salary for Mr. Bragg was increased from $545,900 to $595,000 and the 2014 base salary for Mr. Smith was increased from $307,400 to $318,000. Despite these increases, Mr. Bragg’s and Mr. Smith’s base salaries and overall compensation remained significantly below the market median. In recognition of the fact that they had not received any salary increases since joining Vantage Drilling Company in 2008, the 2014 base salary for Mr. Halkett was increased from $400,000 to $430,000 and the 2014 base salary for Mr. Thomson was increased from $265,000 to $285,000.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards. For 2015, as market conditions continued to deteriorate and the Company began its restructuring efforts, which ultimately resulted in the Company seeking bankruptcy protection, the Board of Directors suspended all annual cash incentive awards. Accordingly, our named executive officers received no annual cash incentive awards for 2015.

Time-based and Performance-based Equity Awards. In 2015, our executive officers received a combination of restricted share awards, performance-based awards and other equity-based awards under Vantage Drilling Company’s 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”). The vesting periods for time-based and performance-based awards were four years and three years, respectively. For 2015, 633,332; 200,004; 333,332 and 159,996 time-based awards and 316,668; 99,996; 166,669 and 80,004 performance-based awards were granted to Messrs. Bragg, Smith, Halkett, and Thomson, respectively. Due to the significant decline in the value of Vantage Drilling Company’s stock, vesting of the time-based and performance-based awards was suspended. The remaining shares in the long-term incentive plan are subject to Vantage Drilling Company’s liquidation proceedings in the Cayman Islands.

2013 Management Incentive Plan. Vantage Drilling Company adopted a Management Incentive Plan (the “2013 MIP”) in 2013. In September 2013, awards under the 2013 MIP were allocated to each of Messrs. Bragg, Smith, Halkett and Thomson in the amount of $450,000, $225,000, $300,000 and $140,000, respectively, and paid in 2014. The Company maintains no further obligation with respect to the 2013 MIP.

2010 Executive Retention Plan. Due to the unavailability of shares necessary to grant awards to its executive officers, in 2010 Vantage Drilling Company adopted the 2010 Executive Retention Plan (“2010 ERP”), to grant awards in line with the recommended amounts included in the executive’s employment agreements.

The total grant date value of the awards granted under the 2010 ERP for the following individuals, together with the portion of the award paid in 2014, is as follows:


Name	2010 Award		Paid in 2014
Paul A. Bragg	$	1,158,750	$	289,687
Douglas G. Smith	$	467,363	$	116,841
Douglas W. Halkett	$	780,000	$	195,000
William L. Thomson	$	437,250	$	109,312

The 2010 ERP expired in 2014; accordingly no awards were paid from the 2010 ERP in 2015.

2016 Compensation Program

Due to the ongoing difficulties in the offshore drilling industry, the Compensation Committee determined that there would be no adjustments to the salaries of the named executive officers for 2016. All annual cash incentive plans have been suspended for 2016. The Compensation Committee intends to grant awards pursuant to the Amended 2016 MIP as part of our overall executive compensation program going forward, and has approved grants of restricted stock units under the Amended 2016 MIP to certain executives of the Company, including our named executive officers, as discussed elsewhere in this discussion and analysis. The Compensation Committee may make additional grants under the Amended 2016 MIP prior to the end of our 2016 fiscal year. Any cash incentives or awards for 2016 will be at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Severance and Other Termination Payments

Executive officers are entitled to receive severance benefits under the terms of their respective employment agreements. During 2015, the named executive officers were subject to the Company’s change of control policy. The purpose of the change of control policy was to:

•

ensure that the actions and recommendations of our senior management with respect to a possible or actual change of control are in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders, and are not influenced by their own personal interests concerning their continued employment status after the change of control; and

•

reduce the distraction regarding the impact of an actual or potential change of control on the personal situation of the named executive officers and other key employees.

In connection with the negotiation of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements (as described and discussed in the section titled “Employment Agreements”), the economic terms of the change of control policy were incorporated into the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements in order to streamline the provision of severance and related benefits with respect to those executives who are party to those employment agreements.

Employment Agreements. Each of our executive officers has an employment agreement that provides for the immediate vesting of all restricted share and option awards upon termination or following a change of control (other than awards previously granted under the Amended 2016 MIP, which awards will be governed by the Amended 2016 MIP and the applicable award agreements). Additionally, each of our executive officers may be entitled to additional severance benefits in the event the officer’s employment is terminated following the change of control.

More detailed information about the employment agreements and the possible payouts under the change of control policy is contained in “Employment Agreements” and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Other Compensation Policies

Perquisites. We provide our executive officers with a several perquisites which we believe are competitive with those of our peer group, including reimbursement for the cost of an annual physical.

Expatriate benefits. Employees, including executive officers, who reside outside of their home country as part of their job responsibilities receive a number of expatriate benefits that we believe are competitive with those of peer companies engaged in significant international operations. For expatriate executive officers, these benefits include paid housing and utilities, use of a car (or a car allowance, depending on the location), payment or reimbursement of in-country taxes, business class round trip flights for annual home leave (or in certain circumstances, the estimated cost of such flights for the executives and their families), school tuition expenses for their children, and for certain jurisdictions, a geographic coefficient. These expatriate benefits phase out over a period of time specified for each of our international and domestic locations.

Entertainment Perquisites. We maintained a package of tickets for a variety of entertainment and sporting events for purposes of business entertainment and use in Company activities, including employee meetings and team building activities. Where a Company use for the tickets has not been scheduled, these tickets were made available to our employees, including our named executive officers, for personal use, and the incremental cost to the Company for tickets provided for the personal use of our named executive officers is included below in the Summary Compensation Table.

Other Compensation. We have established and maintain various employee benefit plans, including medical, dental, life insurance and a 401(k) plan. These plans are generally available to all salaried employees and do not discriminate in favor of executive officers or directors. Additionally, we also provide a car allowance for each of our named executive officers, which is included below in the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Conclusion

We believe that the levels of compensation and the balance between the elements of compensation are appropriate and provide a direct link to enhancing shareholder value, achieving our mission and business strategy, and advancing the other core principles of our compensation philosophy and objectives, including attracting, motivating and retaining the key talent needed to ensure our long-term success. We will continue to monitor current trends and issues in our competitive landscape and will modify our programs where appropriate.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows information concerning the annual compensation for services provided to us by our former Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers during 2015, 2014 and 2013.


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Stock Awards ($) (1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (2)		All Other Compensation ($)			Total Compensation ($)
Paul A. Bragg		2015		595,000		221,666		—		45,327	(3)		861,993
Former Chairman and Chief		2014		595,000		1,776,500		1,016,321		67,357	(3)		3,455,178
Executive Officer		2013		545,900		1,484,780		631,988		67,357	(3)		2,730,005
Douglas G. Smith		2015		318,000		70,001		—		24,900	(3)		412,901
Chief Financial Officer		2014		318,000		561,000		442,703		29,934	(3)		1,351,637
		2013		307,400		411,400		259,991		32,977	(3)		1,011,768
Douglas W. Halkett		2015		430,000		116,666		—		255,925	(3)(4)		802,591
Chief Operating Officer		2014		430,000		935,000		632,579		531,608	(3)(4)		2,529,187
		2013		400,000		748,000		380,032		843,476	(3)(4)		2,371,508
William L. Thomson		2015		285,000		55,999		—		233,571	(3)(4)		574,570
Vice President - Technical Services		2014		285,000		448,800		336,946		528,363	(3)(4)		1,599,109
		2013		265,000		374,000		217,221		484,161	(3)(4)		1,340,382

(1)

The amounts shown represent the grant date fair value of restricted share and option awards calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For detailed information on the assumptions used for purposes of valuing share and option awards, please see “Note 2, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies—Share Based Compensation” in our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

(2)

For 2014, reflects payments to each of Messrs. Bragg, Smith, Halkett, and Thomson, respectively, of (i) $566,321, $217,703, $332,579, and $196,946 made in March 2015 pursuant to a 2014 annual cash incentive program, and (ii) $450,000, $225,000, $300,000, and $140,000 pursuant to the 2013 MIP. For 2013, reflects amount paid to each executive in March 2014, pursuant to a 2013 annual cash incentive award program. Awards under these plans were made to each individual based on the achievement of certain strategic, financial, quality, health and safety, departmental and individual goals established for such individuals.

(3)

For each of Messrs. Bragg, Smith, Halkett and Thompson, reflects the estimated incremental cost to the company for the personal use of entertainment and sporting event tickets in the amounts of $11,427, $0, $5,714, and $5,714 in 2015 and $33,757, $5,334, $5,334 and $0 in 2014, and $32,736, $6,477, $5,549 and $0 in 2013, respectively. With respect to Mr. Bragg and Mr. Smith, respectively, reflects car allowances of $18,000 and $9,000 per year. With respect to Messrs. Bragg, Smith, Halkett and Thomson, reflects the company’s matching contribution to the 401(k) plan for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, in the amounts of $15,900, $15,600 and $15,300 for Mr. Bragg, $15,900, $15,600 and $15,300 for Mr. Smith, $15,900, $15,600 and $15,300 for Mr. Halkett and $15,900, $15,600 and $16,229 for Mr. Thomson.

(4)	Additional detail for “All Other Compensation” is provided in the table below:


Name	Year		Housing ($)		Vehicle ($)		Schooling ($)		Home Airfare ($)		Relocation ($)		Taxes Paid ($)(1)		Geographic Coefficient ($)		Total ($)
Douglas W. Halkett		2015		—		18,000		10,000		27,000		—		179,311		—		234,311
		2014		42,216		18,000		10,000		40,296		—		400,162		—		510,674
		2013		62,194		18,000		10,000		22,140		—		709,364		—		821,698
William L. Thomson		2015		36,923		8,901		20,000		39,432		—		106,701		—		211,957
		2014		60,000		4,755		20,000		4,192		—		423,816		—		512,763
		2013		92,179		21,522		41,527		32,791		22,083		248,555		9,275		467,932

(1)	Includes tax preparation fees for each of Messrs. Halkett and Thomson in the amounts of $15,316 and $10,530 in 2015, $2,738 and $2,676 in 2014, and $2,815 and $1,240 in 2013, respectively.

Employment Agreements

We entered into amended and restated employment agreements (the “Amended and Restated Employment Agreements”) with each of our named executive officers, each effective February 10, 2016. The Amended and Restated Employment Agreements supersede the employment agreements each of our named executive officers had in place with the company prior to the effective date of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan. We entered into the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements primarily for purposes of updating certain terms of our prior arrangements with our named executive officers, including modifications (i) to comply with changes in law, and (ii) to clarify certain terms and definitions. In conjunction with his separation from the Company, we terminated Mr. Bragg’s Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective March 21, 2016.

The Amended and Restated Employment Agreements provide, in accordance with our existing salary structure and incentive compensation plans, that Messrs. Smith, Halkett and Thomson are entitled to annual base salaries of $318,000, $430,000 and $285,000, respectively, with target annual cash incentive awards equal to 75%, 80% and 70%, of their respective salaries. For 2016, due to ongoing market conditions, the Compensation Committee has suspended annual cash incentive awards.

Subject to adjustments based on market conditions and industry compensation trends, each of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements includes a recommendation for the approximate annual amount to be awarded to each executive in the form of restricted shares and/or share options as follows: $750,000 to Mr. Smith, $1,250,000 to Mr. Halkett and $712,500 to Mr. Thomson.

The term of each of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements is subject to automatic extension for an additional one-year period on each anniversary of such agreement, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 90 days before the renewal date.

Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements, each of our named executive officers is prohibited from competing with us or soliciting any of our customers or employees for a period of time following the termination of his employment, the duration of which is based on the circumstances of termination. Additionally, each of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements provides that upon “retirement” (as such term is defined in the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements), all stock awards granted to the applicable executive through the date of retirement shall vest immediately (other than awards previously granted under the Amended 2016 MIP, which awards will be governed by the Amended 2016 MIP and the applicable award agreements).

On May 10, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Douglas E. Stewart, in connection with the appointment of Mr. Stewart to the position of Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Company, to be effective on June 9, 2016. His employment agreement has an initial term expiring on June 9, 2017 and provides for an annual base salary of $285,000 with an annual target bonus, beginning in fiscal year 2017, of no less than 75% of Mr. Stewart’s annual base salary. The other terms of Mr. Stewart’s employment agreement are substantially the same as those in the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements. As contemplated in his employment agreement, on August 24, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a grant to Mr. Stewart consisting of 5,151 time-based restricted stock units and 12,018 performance-based restricted stock units to acquire units of our stapled securities under the Amended 2016 MIP. This grant will become effective on August 29, 2016.

On August 9, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Ihab Toma in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “Employment Agreement”), to be effective as of August 29, 2016 (the “Effective Date”). The initial term of the Employment Agreement is two years from the Effective Date, subject to automatic one-year renewals thereafter. The initial two-year term, and any subsequent annual renewal terms, may end earlier in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement.

Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Toma will receive an annual base salary of $500,000, and will have the opportunity to earn an annual bonus based on his and/or our achievement of certain performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee. For each fiscal year beginning with our 2017 fiscal year, Mr. Toma’s target annual bonus opportunity will be equal to 100% of his annual base salary (the “Target Annual Bonus”), subject to a maximum annual bonus payout equal to 200% of his base salary. For our 2016 fiscal year, Mr. Toma will be eligible to receive a pro-rated annual bonus, based on the actual achievement of the applicable performance criteria, and pro-rated for the number of days Mr. Toma was employed by us during the Company’s 2016 fiscal year. Mr. Toma will also receive a housing allowance of $7,500 per month for up to three years following the Effective Date.

In connection with his appointment to the position of Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors, upon the Compensation Committee’s recommendation, approved a grant to Mr. Toma under the Amended 2016 MIP consisting of 43,266 performance-based restricted stock units to acquire units of our stapled securities (the “Performance-Based Awards”) that vest based on the Company’s “total enterprise value” (as defined in the applicable award agreement), as measured on the first to occur of either (i) a “qualified liquidity event” (as defined in the applicable award agreement); or (ii) February 10, 2023. Upon certain terminations of employment, a portion of the Performance-Based Awards will remain eligible to vest based on future performance. The Board of Directors also approved a grant under the Amended 2016 MIP consisting of 18,543 time-based restricted stock units to acquire units of our stapled securities (the “Time-Based Awards”) that vest ratably on each of the first four anniversaries of the effective date of the Company’s plan of reorganization, subject to Mr. Toma’s continuous employment with us on each applicable vesting date. Upon a qualified liquidity event, the unvested portion (if any) of the Time-Based awards will vest. The Performance-Based Awards and Time-Based Awards will become effective on the Effective Date.

If we terminate Mr. Toma’s employment without “cause” or if Mr. Toma resigns his employment for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the Employment Agreement, and in either case, a “Qualifying Termination”), Mr. Toma will be eligible to receive an amount equal to two times the sum of (i) his annual base salary plus (ii) his Target Annual Bonus, payable in equal installments over a two-year period following the termination date. In the event of an “anticipatory termination” within six months prior to a “change of control” (as those terms are defined in the Employment Agreement) or a Qualifying Termination within two years following a change of control, Mr. Toma will be eligible to receive one year of outplacement assistance and an amount equal to three times the sum of (i) his annual base salary plus (ii) his “average bonus amount” (as defined in the Employment Agreement, and which generally means the average of any annual bonuses paid or payable during the three-year period prior to occurrence of the change of control (but no less than his Target Annual Bonus for any such year)). In the event of Mr. Toma’s death or “disability” (as defined in the Employment Agreement), he will be eligible to receive a pro-rated annual bonus, based on the actual achievement of the applicable performance criteria, and pro-rated for the number of days Mr. Toma was employed with the Company during the Company’s applicable fiscal year. In order to receive any of the severance benefits described above, Mr. Toma must execute a valid release of claims in favor of the Company.

Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Toma has agreed to indefinite confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations. The Employment Agreement also provides that Mr. Toma will not compete with us or solicit our customers or employees, in any case during his employment with us or for a period of one year thereafter. This period increases to two years in the case of Mr. Toma’s retirement from the Company and, in the case of the non-competition provision, is also extended to coincide with his continued receipt of severance benefits (for a period of up to two years following the termination of his employment with us).

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

Assuming the employment of any of our named executive officers was to be terminated without cause, for good reason, or constructively terminated without cause, or in the event of a change of control, each as of December 31, 2015, the named executive officer would be entitled to payments in the amounts set forth below:

Termination Without Cause, For Good Reason, or Constructive Termination


Compensation Type	Paul A. Bragg (1)		Douglas G. Smith		Douglas W. Halkett		William L. Thomson
Salary (2)	$	1,785,000	$	636,000	$	860,000	$	285,000
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation (2)	$	1,785,000	$	477,000	$	688,000	$	199,500
Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards (3)	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0

Total	$	3,750,000	$	1,113,000	$	1,548,000	$	484,500


Termination Following a Change of Control
Salary (4)	$	1,785,000	$	954,000	$	1,290,000	$	570,000
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation (4)	$	1,785,000	$	715,500	$	1,032,000	$	399,000
Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards (3)	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0

Total	$	3,750,000	$	1,669,500	$	2,322,000	$	969,000

(1)	Effective March 21, 2016, Mr. Bragg resigned as a named executive officer of the Company. The Company is currently in discussions with Mr. Bragg regarding his severance arrangements.

(2)

Reflects payments equal to three years of annual salary and target non-equity incentive compensation in the case of Mr. Bragg, two years of annual salary and target non-equity incentive compensation in the case of Messrs. Smith and Halkett, and one year of annual salary and target non-equity incentive compensation in the case of Mr. Thomson.

(3)

Under the terms of their respective employment agreements, each of our named executive officers is entitled to receive immediate vesting of all restricted share and option awards upon termination without cause, termination by the executive with good reason or upon a change of control. Additionally, under the terms of our performance-unit awards, awards will vest at the target amount upon a change of control. At December 31, 2015, the named executive officers held unvested shares of Vantage Drilling Company valued at the closing price of $0.00 per share on such date.

(4)	Reflects payments equal to three years of annual salary and target non-equity incentive compensation for Messrs. Bragg, Smith and Halkett, and two years of salary and target non-equity incentive compensation for Mr. Thomson, payable pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements.

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreements, upon a termination without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason,” the named executive officers are eligible to receive severance payments based on a multiple of the applicable executive officer’s base salary and target annual bonus for the year of termination. Cash payments are payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll cycle over the applicable severance period, except in the case of a termination in connection with a change of control, in which case the payments are made in a lump sum on the sixtieth day following the termination event. We are not obligated to make any cash payments to these executives if their employment is terminated by us for cause or by the executive without good reason. In the event of an executive’s death, we will pay the executive’s estate an amount equal to his annual base salary, bonus and the value of any equity awards. In the event of an executive’s disability, his employment will continue for one year from the date of disability. In addition, assuming the employment of any of our named executive officers was to be terminated “without cause,” for “good reason,” or in the event of a “change of control” (as each such term is defined in the employment agreements), he would be entitled to accelerated vesting of all options and share awards (other than awards previously granted under the Amended 2016 MIP, which awards will be governed by the Amended 2016 MIP and the applicable award agreements).

During the named executive officer’s employment and for a period of (a) one year following a termination (or, with respect to the non-competition restriction, a period of time not to exceed two years following a termination during which the executive receives any payment of base salary from the Company) without cause, for good reason, constructive termination without cause; (b) six months following a termination following a change of control; or (c) two years following a termination due to retirement, the executive cannot work anywhere in the specified geographic region, and directly or indirectly:

(i) perform services for, have any ownership interest in, or participate in any business that engages or participates in a competing business purpose;

(ii) induce or attempt to induce any customer or client or prospective customer or client whom the executive dealt with or solicited while employed by us during the last twelve months of his employment; or

(iii) solicit, attempt to hire, or have any person employed by us work for the executive or for another entity, firm, corporation or individual.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End

The vesting of outstanding equity awards provided to our named executive officers by Vantage Drilling Company was suspended prior to December 31, 2015 as the trading value of the shares of Vantage Drilling Company was below the administrative costs of vesting the awards.

Director and Consultant Compensation Paid to John C. G. O’Leary

In May 2012, Vantage Drilling Company entered into a consulting agreement with Strand Energy, which is owned by John C.G. O’Leary. Mr. O’Leary was a member of Vantage Drilling Company’s Board of Directors until the effectiveness of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan on February 10, 2016. We assumed the obligations under this consulting agreement, effective as of February 10, 2016. The consulting agreement, as amended, has a monthly consulting fee of $30,000 and entitles Mr. O’Leary to participate in our benefit and executive compensation programs. Additionally, Mr. O’Leary may also be entitled to receive a transaction fee equal to 1.0% of the value of any transaction he originates or to which he significantly contributes, subject to a final determination by our Board of Directors. The aggregate amount that Mr. O’Leary may earn under the consulting agreement is limited to $2 million per year. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, Mr. O’Leary remains free to perform certain consulting work for other companies and is eligible to receive fees from other parties on transactions with us. Mr. O’Leary did not originate any transactions in 2013, 2014, or 2015 that resulted in the payment of a transaction fee. The consulting agreement with Strand Energy was terminated on April 30, 2016.

The following table indicates the compensation received by Mr. O’Leary from Vantage Drilling Company during 2013, 2014 and 2015 pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, as amended, including all compensation paid under the terms of Vantage Drilling Company’s long-term incentive plan and annual cash incentive award plan.


Year	Consulting Fees ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (1)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total Compensation ($)
2015		360,000		94,500		—		—		—		454,500
2014		360,000		504,900		—		401,148		—		1,350,198
2013		360,000		504,900		—		317,001		—		1,181,901

(1)

For 2014, reflects payment of $261,158 paid in March 2014 under Vantage Drilling Company’s annual cash incentive award program, as well as the payment of $140,000 pursuant to the 2013 MIP. For 2013, reflects amounts paid pursuant to Vantage Drilling Company’s 2013 annual cash incentive award program.

Mr. O’Leary has provided us with guidance on business opportunities at shipyards around the world, and assisted us in identifying unique rig contracting and collaborative opportunities with strategic partners. We believe that the monthly consulting fee paid to, and the terms of the consulting agreement with, Strand Energy are no less favorable than could have been obtained from a non-affiliated third party. In effect, Mr. O’Leary filled the roles of an executive responsible for our business development and strategic planning roles. Without retaining his services, we believe it would have been essential to recruit one or more senior executives to assist us with business development and strategic planning opportunities.

We considered Strand Energy’s consulting services in connection with our business and strategic development to be commensurate with the skill, specialized knowledge and professional contacts possessed by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer. On this basis, and in line with the compensation arrangements for these other named executive officers, we established Strand Energy’s salary, share awards and non-equity incentive plan compensation.

Director Compensation

The members of the Company’s current Board of Directors were each elected as directors effective February 10, 2016, upon the effectiveness of the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan. The Board of Directors has approved compensation for independent board members consisting of $133,333 of annual cash compensation and $66,667 of stock awards. Additionally, each independent board member shall receive $2,000 for each board or committee meeting attended in-person and $1,000 for each board or committee meeting attended telephonically. The Chairman of the Board of Directors will receive an additional $50,000 of annual cash consideration and the Chairman of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Compensation Committee will each receive an additional $10,000 of annual cash consideration. The cash consideration will be paid quarterly in arrears. The board members currently determined to be independent for purposes of receiving compensation are Messrs. Bates, Ikaheimonen, Larsen, and Wells.

All of the directors are reimbursed for reasonable, necessary and documented travel, subsistence, and other related expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their official board duties.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the current members of our Compensation Committee serves, or has at any time served, as an officer or employee of us or any of our subsidiaries. None of our executive officers has served as a director or member of the Compensation Committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as one of our directors or a member of our Compensation Committee.

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING HOLDERS

The following table sets forth as of August 15, 2016 information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares and shows the number of Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares and the percentage owned by:

•

each member of our Board of Directors and each of our named executive officers;

•

all of the executive officers and members of the Board of Directors as a group;

•

each person known to beneficially own more than 5% of our Ordinary Shares, each of whom is a selling holder; and

•

all other selling holders.

As of August 15, 2016, we had 4,344,959 Units of Stapled Securities and 5,000,053 Ordinary Shares outstanding. The amounts and percentages of Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which he has no economic interest. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, each of the beneficial owners has, to our knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the indicated Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares and has not pledged any such Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares as security.


Name of beneficial owner (1)	Number of Stapled Securities beneficially owned		Percent of Class			Units of Stapled Securities That May Be Offered For Resale (2)		Number of Ordinary Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class
5% Shareholders:
Anchorage Funds(3)(4)		822,947		18.94	%		822,947		822,947		16.46	%
York Funds(3)(5)		816,384		18.79	%		816,384		816,384		16.33	%
Vantage Drilling Company(6)		—		—			—		655,094		13.10	%
Knighthead Funds(3)(7)		361,582		8.32	%		361,582		361,582		7.23	%
Q Funds(3)(8)		312,235		7.19	%		312,235		312,235		6.24	%
GoldenTree Funds(3)(9)		250,963		5.78	%		250,963		250,963		5.02	%
Other Shareholders:
Whitebox Funds(3)(10)		161,083		3.71	%		161,083		161,083		3.22	%
Wingspan Funds(3)(11)		141,679		3.26	%		141,679		141,679		2.83	%
AllianceBernstein L.P.(3)(12)		132,227		3.04	%		132,227		132,227		2.64	%
Directors and named executive officers:
Matthew W. Bonanno (13)		—		—			—		—		—
Scott McCarty (14)		—		—			—		—		—
Thomas R. Bates, Jr.		—		—			—		—		—
Esa Ikaheimonen		—		—			—		—		—
Nils E. Larsen		—		—			—		—		—
L. Spencer Wells		—		—			—		—		—
Ihab Toma (15)		—		—			—		—		—
Paul A. Bragg (16)		—		—			—		—		—
Douglas W. Halkett		—		—			—		—		—
Douglas G. Smith		—		—			—		—		—
William L. Thomson		—		—			—		—		—
Edward G. Brantley		—		—			—		—		—
Linda J. Ibrahim		—		—			—		—		—
Douglas E. Stewart		—		—			—		—		—
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)		—		—			—		—		—

(1)	Unless otherwise indicated, the address of all beneficial owners of our Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares set forth above is 777 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.

(2)

The Stapled Securities (including the Ordinary Shares forming a part thereof and the Ordinary Shares issuable upon the conversion of the Notes forming a part thereof) that may be offered for resale by the selling holders pursuant to this prospectus were acquired by the selling holders in connection with the Emergence pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization in transactions that were exempt from registration under Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code. See “Summary—Restructuring Agreement and Bankruptcy Proceedings under Chapter 11” for additional information regarding the Emergence and how the selling holders acquired our Stapled Securities, including the Ordinary Shares. We have been advised that none of the selling holders is a broker-dealer and that each selling holder that is an affiliate of a broker-dealer acquired its Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares in the ordinary course of its business and, at the time of acquisition, had no agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

(3)	The number of Ordinary Shares beneficially owned reported herein reflects Ordinary Shares that are part of the Stapled Securities owned by this holder.

(4)

Includes (i) 10,941 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by PCI Fund LLC (“PCI”) and (ii) 812,006 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Anchorage Capital Master Offshore, Ltd. (“ACMO” and, together with PCI, the “Anchorage Funds”), in each case all of which may be offered for resale. Anchorage Advisors Management, L.L.C. (“Management”) is the sole managing member of Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C. (“Capital Group”), the investment advisor to the Anchorage Funds. Mr. Kevin Ulrich (“Mr. Ulrich”) is the Chief Executive Officer of Capital Group and the senior managing member of Management. Management, Capital Group and Mr. Ulrich may be deemed to beneficially own the Stapled Securities held by the Anchorage Funds. Management, Capital Group and Mr. Ulrich each disclaims beneficial ownership of such Stapled Securities except to the extent, if any, of its or his pecuniary interests therein. The business address for each of the funds named in this footnote 4 is c/o Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C., 610 Broadway, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10012.

(5)

Includes (i) 287,056 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by York Global Finance BDH, LLC of which York Global Finance Manager, LLC is the manager; (ii) 176,755 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by York Credit Opportunities Investments Master Fund, L.P. of which York Credit Opportunities Domestic Holdings, LLC is the general partner; (iii) 171,014 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by York Credit Opportunities Fund, L.P. of which York Credit Opportunities Domestic Holdings, LLC is the general partner; (iv) 848 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by dbX-Event Driven 2 Fund of which York Managed Holdings, LLC is the investment manager; (v) 7,393 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Fidelis York Fund, L.P. of which Dinan Management, L.L.C. is the general partner; (vi) 3,593 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Jorvik Multi-Strategy Master Fund, L.P. of which Dinan Management, L.L.C. is the general partner; (vii) 98,496 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by York Multi-Strategy Master Fund, L.P. of which Dinan Management, L.L.C. is the general partner; (viii) 68,030 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by York Capital Management, L.P. of which Dinan Management, L.L.C. is the general partner; and (ix) 3,199 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by P York IE, a fund of Permal Managed Account Platform ICAV of which York Managed Holdings, LLC is the investment advisor, in each case all of which may be offered for resale. The managing member or senior managing member, as the case may be, of each of the managers or general partners, as applicable, of the funds described in this footnote 5 is York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC. James G. Dinan is the chairman and controls York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC. York Global Finance Manager, LLC, York Credit Opportunities Domestic Holdings, LLC, York Managed Holdings, LLC, Dinan Management, L.L.C., York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, and James G. Dinan may be deemed to beneficially own the Stapled Securities held by the respective fund over which they serve as manager, general partner, investment manager or investment advisor, as the case may be. York Global Finance Manager, LLC, York Credit Opportunities Domestic Holdings, LLC, York Managed Holdings, LLC, Dinan Management, L.L.C., York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, and James G. Dinan, as the case may be, each disclaim beneficial ownership of such Stapled Securities except to the extent of their pecuniary interests therein. A partner of York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, Matthew W. Bonanno, is currently on the board of directors of Vantage Drilling International. Representatives of York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, Meghan Force and Richard Swanson, are currently on the liquidation committee for Vantage Drilling Company on behalf of York Global Finance BDH, LLC. The business address for each of the funds named in this footnote 5 is 767 5th Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10153.

(6)	The business address of Vantage Drilling Company is c/o KPMG, P.O. Box 493, Century Yard, Cricket Square, Grand Cayman KY1-1106, Cayman Islands.

(7)

Includes (i) 26,614 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Knighthead Annuity and Life Assurance Company (“Knighthead Annuity”) on whose behalf, its investment advisor, Knighthead Capital Management, LLC (“Knighthead Capital”), has full discretion to make investment decisions; (ii) 27,341 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Knighthead (NY) Fund, LP (“Knighthead NY”) of which Knighthead (NY) GP, LLC (“Knighthead NY GP”) is the general partner; and (iii) 307,627 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Knighthead Master Fund LP (“Knighthead Master” and, together with Knighthead Annuity and Knighthead NY, the “Knighthead Funds” ) of which Knighthead GP, LLC (“Knighthead GP”) is the general partner, in each case all of which may be offered for resale. Knighthead Capital is the investment advisor for the Knighthead Funds, and the managing members of Knighthead Capital are Thomas Wagner and Ara Cohen (collectively the “Knighthead Managers”). Knighthead Capital, Knighthead NY GP, Knighthead GP, and each of the Knighthead Managers may be deemed to beneficially own the Stapled Securities held by the respective fund over which they serve as investment advisor or general partner, as the case may be. Knighthead Capital, Knighthead NY GP, and Knighthead GP, as the case may be, disclaim beneficial ownership of such Stapled Securities. The business address for each of the Knighthead Funds is 1140 Avenue of the Americas, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10036.

(8)

Includes (i) 176,517 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Amalgamated Gadget, L.P. (“Amalgamated”) for and on behalf of R2 Investments, LDC (“R2”) pursuant to an investment management agreement; pursuant to such agreement, Amalgamated has sole voting and dispositive power of R2’s shares, and R2 has no beneficial ownership of such shares; Amalgamated is controlled by its general partner, Scepter Holdings, Inc. (“Scepter”), which is controlled by Geoffrey P. Raynor; (ii) 13,819 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Prufrock Offshore, L.P. (“Prufrock Offshore”) for and on behalf of R3, Ltd. (“R3”) pursuant to an investment management agreement; pursuant to such agreement, Prufrock Offshore has sole voting and dispositive power of R3’s shares, and R3 has no beneficial ownership of such shares; Prufrock Offshore is controlled by its general partner, J Alfred Offshore, LLC, which is controlled by Geoffrey P. Raynor; (iii) 17,456 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Worldwide Sprockets, L.P. (“Sprockets”) for and on behalf of R4, Ltd. (“R4”) pursuant to an investment management agreement; pursuant to such agreement, Sprockets has sole voting and dispositive power of R4’s shares, and R4 has no beneficial ownership of such shares; Sprockets is controlled by its general partner, Excalibur Worldwide, LLC, which is controlled by Geoffrey P. Raynor; (iv) 2,540 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Prufrock Offshore for and on behalf of High Octane, Ltd (“HO”) pursuant to an investment management agreement; pursuant to such agreement, Prufrock Offshore has sole voting and dispositive power of HO’s shares, and HO has no beneficial ownership of such shares; Prufrock Offshore is controlled by its general partner, J Alfred Offshore, LLC, which is controlled by Geoffrey P. Raynor; (v) 23,305 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Star Spangled Sprockets, L.P. (“SSS”) as general partner of Q4 Funding, L.P.; the general partner of SSS is Excalibur Domestic, LLC, which is controlled by Geoffrey P. Raynor; (vi) 5,132 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Prufrock Onshore, L.P. (“Prufrock Onshore”) as general partner of Q Funding III, L.P.; the general partner of Prufrock Onshore is J Alfred Onshore, LLC, which is controlled by Geoffrey P. Raynor; and (vii) 73,466 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Scepter as general partner of Acme Energized, L.P. All of Stapled Securities of each of the funds named in this footnote 8 may be offered for resale. Renegade Swish, LLC, an affiliate of each of the funds named in this footnote 8, employs a current member of the Board of Directors of Vantage Drilling International, Mr. Scott McCarty, and also previously employed Mr. Robert Tamburrino, the former Chief Restructuring Officer of Vantage Drilling International. The business address of each of the beneficial owners named in this footnote 8 is 301 Commerce Street, Suite 3200, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.

(9)

Includes (i) 43,011 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree 2004 Trust; (ii) 70,983 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree Distressed Master Fund 2014 Ltd.; (iii) 11,395 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree Distressed Fund 2014 LP; (iv) 3,841 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree E Distressed Debt Master Fund II LP; (v) 291 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree E Distressed Debt Fund II LP; (vi) 4,190 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree Entrust Master Fund SPC on behalf of and for the account of Segregated Portfolio I; (vii) 6,468 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree Master Fund II, Ltd.; (viii) 69,929 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree Master Fund, Ltd.; (ix) 19,365 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GN3 SIP Limited; (x) 824 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GoldenTree Insurance Fund Series Interests of the SALI Multi-Series Fund, L.P.; (xi) 4,356 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by GT NM, L.P.; (xii) 3,322 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Association; (xiii) 8,644 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Gold Coast Capital Subsidiary X Limited; and (xiv) 4,344 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Stellar Performer Global Series: Series G- Global Credit, in each case all of which may be offered for resale. The investment manager for each of the funds named in this footnote 9 is GoldenTree Asset Management LP (“GTAM LP”). GoldenTree Asset Management LLC (“GTAM LLC”) is the general partner of GTAM LP. The Chief Investment Officer of GTAM LP is Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, who is also Managing Member of GTAM LLC. GTAM LP, GTAM LLC and Mr. Tananbaum may be deemed to beneficially own the Stapled Securities held by each of the funds named in this footnote 9. GTAM LP, GTAM LLC and Mr. Tananbaum each disclaim beneficial ownership of such Stapled Securities except to the extent of their pecuniary interests therein. The business address for each of the funds named in this footnote 9 is 300 Park Avenue, 21st Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(10)

Includes (i) 64,649 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Whitebox Asymmetric Partners, LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership and (ii) 96,434 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Whitebox Multi-Strategy Partners, LP, a British Virgin Islands limited partnership, in each case all of which may be offered for resale. Whitebox General Partner LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, serves as the general partner of both Whitebox Asymmetric Partners, LP and Whitebox Multi-Strategy Partners, LP. Whitebox Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, serves as the investment manager of each of the funds named in this footnote 10. Whitebox General Partner LLC is owned by the following: Whitebox Holdings, LLC (wholly owned by Andrew Redleaf), Skagday, Inc. (wholly owned by Robert Vogel), Paul Twitchell , Mark Strefling and Richard Vigilante (collectively, the “Whitebox principals”) and Dyal Capital Partners II (B) LP, a third-party private fund holding a passive, non-voting minority equity interest. Whitebox Advisors LLC is owned by the Whitebox principals and Dyal Capital Partners II (A) LP, a third-party private fund holding a passive, non-voting minority equity interest. Whitebox General Partner LLC, Whitebox Advisors LLC, each of the Whitebox principals, Dyal Capital Partners II (B) LP, and Dyal Capital Partners II (A) LP may be deemed to beneficially own the Stapled Securities held by each of the funds named in this footnote 10. Whitebox General Partner LLC, Whitebox Advisors LLC, each of the Whitebox principals, Dyal Capital Partners II (B) LP and Dyal Capital Partners II (A) LP each disclaim beneficial ownership of such Stapled Securities except to the extent of their pecuniary interests therein. The business address for each of the funds named in this footnote 10 is 3033 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55416.

(11)

Includes (i) 115,435 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Wingspan Master Fund, LP (“Master Fund”) and (ii) 26,244 Units of Stapled Securities held of record by Alpine Swift Master, LP (“Alpine Master” and, together with Master Fund, the “Wingspan Funds”), in each case all of which may be offered for resale. The investment manager of the Wingspan Funds is Wingspan Investment Management, LP (“WIM LP”). Wingspan Investment Management GP LLC (“WIM GP”) is the general partner of WIM LP. The managing member of WIM GP is Buck Ratchford. WIM LP, WIM GP and Mr. Ratchford may be deemed to beneficially own the Stapled Securities held by the Wingspan Funds. WIM LP, WIM GP and Mr. Ratchford each disclaim beneficial ownership of such Stapled Securities except to the extent of their pecuniary interests therein. The business address for the Wingspan Funds is 767 Fifth Avenue, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10153.

(12)

AllianceBernstein L.P. holds voting or investment power with respect to the Stapled Securities. AllianceBernstein Corp. is the general partner of AllianceBernstein L.P., and AXA Financial controls AllianceBernstein Corp. The business address for AllianceBernstein L.P. is 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105.

(13)

Does not include 816,384 ordinary shares held by the York Funds. Mr. Bonanno, a partner of York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, is currently on the Board of Directors of Vantage Drilling International. Mr. Bonanno disclaims beneficial ownership of any ordinary shares owned directly or indirectly by the York Funds.

(14)

Does not include 312,235 ordinary shares held by the Q Funds. Mr. McCarty, a current member of our Board of Directors, is employed by Renegade Swish LLC, an affiliate of each of the Q Funds listed in footnote 8. Mr. McCarty disclaims beneficial ownership of any ordinary shares owned directly or indirectly by the Q Funds.

(15)	Appointment effective August 29, 2016.

(16)	Effective March 21, 2016, Mr. Bragg resigned as the President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive of the Company, and as a director of the Company.

Relationships with Selling Holders

None of the selling holders has had any material relationships with the Company within the past three years other than representation on the Company’s Board of Directors or other executive officer positions, as described in the table above.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Equity awards were made in 2015 pursuant to the Vantage Drilling Company LTIP. Due to the significant decline in the value of Vantage Drilling Company’s stock, vesting of the time-based and performance-based awards was suspended. The remaining shares in the long-term incentive plan are subject to Vantage Drilling Company’s liquidation proceedings in the Cayman Islands. In August 2016, grants to certain executives of the Company, including Ihab Toma, of restricted stock units to acquire units of Stapled Securities were approved. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In the ordinary course of our business, we may enter into transactions with our directors, officers and 5% or greater shareholders.

Consulting Agreement with John C.G. O’Leary

In May 2012, Vantage Drilling Company entered into a consulting agreement with Strand Energy, which is owned by John C.G. O’Leary. Mr. O’Leary was a member of Vantage Drilling Company’s Board of Directors until the effectiveness of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan on February 10, 2016. We assumed the obligations under this consulting agreement effective as of February 10, 2016. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, Strand Energy provides us with consulting services to the offshore oil and gas markets, and we pay Strand Energy a monthly consulting fee of $30,000. Additionally, under the terms of the consulting agreement, Mr. O’Leary is entitled to participate in our benefit and executive compensation programs, and Mr. O’Leary may also be entitled to receive a transaction fee equal to 1.0% of the value of any transaction he originates or to which he significantly contributes, subject to a final determination by the Board of Directors. Mr. O’Leary remains free to perform certain consulting work for other companies and is eligible to receive fees on transactions with us where he has performed consulting services for the other parties to the transaction. The agreement was terminated on April 30, 2016. For more information, see “Executive Compensation and Analysis—Director and Consultant Compensation Paid to John C.G. O’Leary.”

The Shareholders Agreement

On February 10, 2016, the Company entered into the Shareholders Agreement (the “Shareholders Agreement”) by and between the Company and the Shareholders (as defined therein). The Shareholders Agreement sets forth the size and composition of the Board and places certain limitations on what actions can be taken by the Board without the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Ordinary Shares not held by Vantage Drilling Company. The Shareholders Agreement provides the parties thereto with certain information and inspection rights. The Shareholders Agreement places certain restrictions on the transferability of the Company’s shares and also provides that the shares are subject to the tag rights, drag rights, preemptive rights and registration rights set forth or referenced therein.

The foregoing summary description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Shareholders Agreement, which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Registration Statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Registration Rights Agreement

On February 10, 2016, in connection with the effectiveness of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan, we entered into a registration rights agreement with certain of our holders (as amended, the “Registration Rights Agreement”), which provides the holders party thereto certain registration rights. Certain of the holders party to the Registration Rights Agreement are affiliates of Renegade Swish, LLC, which employs both a current member of the Board of Directors of the Company, Mr. Scott McCarty, and the former Chief Restructuring Officer of the Company, Mr. Robert Tamburrino. The managing member or senior managing member of the managers or general partners of certain other holders party to the Registration Rights Agreement is York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC. A partner of York Capital Management Global Advisors, LLC, Matthew W. Bonanno, is currently on the Board of Directors of the Company.

The Registration Rights Agreement provides for the registration of certain securities of the Company issued to any holder or subsequently acquired in the open market by any holder and requires the Company to file a shelf registration statement on or prior to the ninetieth (90th) day following the date on which our Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan becomes effective, and to include such securities each holder party thereto requests inclusion therein, subject to certain exceptions, conditions and limitations. These registration rights include Form S-3 registration rights, demand registration and piggyback registration rights, subject, in each case, to the terms and conditions identified in the Registration Rights Agreement. The Company has agreed to pay all registration expenses under the Registration Rights Agreement, except that the selling holders may be responsible for their pro rata shares of underwriters’ discounts and commissions, if any, and certain other expenses. Additionally, the Company has agreed to indemnify the holders party thereto against certain liabilities.

On May 9, 2016, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Rights Agreement to extend the required filing date of the initial shelf registration to June 16, 2016.

Our Policies Regarding Review, Approval or Ratification of Related-Party Transactions

The Audit Committee is responsible for approving related party transactions. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter pursuant to which all related party transactions are reviewed for potential conflict of interest situations. Such transactions must be approved by the Audit Committee prior to consummation.

Director Independence

To evaluate the independence of individual directors, the Board of Directors has elected to use the definition of independence as defined by the NYSE MKT. The Board of Directors has determined that the following members are independent: Messrs. Bates, Ikaheimonen, Larsen and Wells. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

SECURITIES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our Ordinary Shares or Stapled Securities. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that sales of Ordinary Shares or Stapled Securities or the availability of Ordinary Shares or Stapled Securities for sale will have on the market price of our Ordinary Shares and Stapled Securities prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of our Ordinary Shares or Stapled Securities in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our Ordinary Shares and Stapled Securities.

Shares Owned by VDC

VDC, on account of the conversion of the VDC Note in connection with the Emergence, currently owns approximately 13% of our outstanding Ordinary Shares. Although pursuant to the terms of the Plan of Reorganization, VDC has the right to require us to file a registration statement in respect of such Ordinary Shares, VDC has not exercised such right.

We expect that in connection with VDC’s ongoing official liquidation proceedings in the Cayman Island, the Ordinary Shares owned by VDC will be distributed to VDC’s creditors, although no certainty can be given as to the ultimate amount of Ordinary Shares to be distributed, if any, or the method or timing of any such distribution. In addition, VDC may choose to sell such Ordinary Shares and distribute the proceeds thereof instead of effectuating a distribution of the Ordinary Shares.

Rule 144

In general, under Rule 144 of the Securities Act (“Rule 144”), as currently in effect, once we have been subject to public company reporting requirements for at least 90 days, a person who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the securities proposed to be sold for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell such securities without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation, or notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to compliance with the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially owned the securities proposed to be sold for at least one year, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, then such person is entitled to sell such securities without complying with any of the requirements of Rule 144.

In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, our affiliates or persons selling securities on behalf of our affiliates, who have beneficially owned restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 for at least six months, are entitled to sell within any three-month period beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a number of Ordinary Shares or an amount of Stapled Securities that does not exceed the greater of:

•

1% of the number of Ordinary Shares or Stapled Securities, as applicable, then outstanding; or

•

the average weekly trading volume of the Ordinary Shares or Stapled Securities, as applicable, during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect to such sale.

Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.

DESCRIPTION OF STAPLED SECURITIES

The following description is a summary of the material provisions of the Indenture under which we issued 4,344,959 units of Stapled Securities (the “Stapled Securities”). This summary does not restate the Indenture in its entirety. We urge you to read the Indenture because it, and not this description, will define your rights as holders of the Stapled Securities. Copies of the Indenture, including the form of Stapled Security, are available as set forth in this prospectus under “Description of the Notes—Additional Information.” You can find the definitions of certain terms used in this description under “Description of the Notes—Certain Definitions.” In this description, the “Company” refers only to Vantage Drilling International, a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability, and any successor.

General

On the Issue Date, the Company issued 4,344,959 units of Stapled Securities pursuant to the Indenture. The Stapled Securities were issued in denominations of 1 unit and integral multiples of 1 unit in excess thereof. Each Stapled Security initially represents:

•

One Ordinary Share; and

•

An original issuance amount of $172.61 principal amount of the Notes.

The ratio of Ordinary Shares to Notes represented by a Stapled Security is subject to adjustment upon the payment of PIK Interest and certain cases of redemption or conversion of the Notes, as well as share splits, share dividends, consolidation or reclassification of our Ordinary Shares. See “—Adjustments to Ratio.” Within fifteen (15) days of the occurrence of any such event, the Company will deliver a notice of the increase or decrease to the holders of Notes, which notice shall state (i) the amount of the increase or decrease, (ii) the event giving rise to such increase or decrease and (iii) the principal amount of Notes and/or number of Ordinary Shares included in each Stapled Security following such increase or decrease. The Notes and the Ordinary Shares represented by Stapled Securities may not be transferred or exchanged separately, and may be transferred or exchanged only together until separated. Holders of Stapled Securities may not separate their Stapled Securities into the component Notes and Ordinary Shares. Such Notes and Ordinary Shares represented by Stapled Securities may only be separated upon the occurrence of the events discussed below under “—Automatic Separation.”

Holders of Stapled Securities are the beneficial owners of the Ordinary Shares and Notes represented by such Stapled Securities and will have exactly the same rights, privileges and preferences, including voting rights, rights to receive distributions, rights and preferences in the event of a default under the Indenture, ranking upon bankruptcy and rights to receive communications and notices as a direct holder of the Ordinary Shares and Notes, as applicable.

The Stapled Securities will be available in book-entry form only. As discussed below under “—Book Entry Settlement and Clearance,” a nominee of DTC will be the sole registered holder of the Stapled Securities. That means you will not be a registered holder of Stapled Securities or be entitled to receive a certificate evidencing your Stapled Securities. Accordingly, you must rely on the procedures used by your broker or other financial institution that will maintain your book-entry position to receive the benefits and exercise the rights of a holder of Stapled Securities that are described below. You should consult with your broker or financial institution to find out what those procedures are.

Automatic Separation

Upon the occurrence of any of the following events, the Ordinary Shares associated with each Stapled Security affected will automatically separate:

•

the repayment in full by the Company of the Notes in the event that the principal of the Notes has become due and payable, whether at Stated Maturity or upon acceleration thereof;

•

the conversion of all of the Notes into Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Indenture in accordance with the provisions described under “Description of the Notes—Conversion Rights;”

•

the payment by the Company of the applicable redemption price in accordance with the terms of the Indenture in connection with any exercise by the Company of its right to redeem all of the Notes;

•

the payment by the Company of the applicable purchase price for Notes associated with such Ordinary Shares in accordance with the terms of the Indenture in the event of any exercise by a holder of Notes of its right to require the Company to repurchase its Notes pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture described under “Description of the Notes —Redemption and Offer to Purchase—Change of Control;” or

•

the payment by the Company of the applicable purchase price for Notes associated with such Ordinary Shares in accordance with the terms of the Indenture following any exercise by a holder of Notes of its right to require the Company to repurchase its Notes in connection with an Asset Sale Offer pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture described under “Description of the Notes—Asset Sales.”

In addition, upon the acquisition of a Stapled Security by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company that is treated as an entity disregarded as separate from the Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Ordinary Shares and Notes associated with such Stapled Security will automatically separate.

Adjustments to Ratio

The ratio of Ordinary Shares to Notes represented by a Stapled Security is subject to change upon the occurrence of the events set forth in this section.

First, if the Company exercises its option to redeem the Notes in part, and such redemption does not include redemption of all of the outstanding Notes on the applicable Redemption Date, a corresponding adjustment will be made to any Stapled Securities that remain outstanding following such Redemption Date to reflect the reduction in the principal amount of Notes represented by each Stapled Security.

Second, if the Notes are converted pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture described under “Description of the Notes—Conversion Rights” in part, and such conversion does not include conversion of all of the outstanding Notes, a corresponding adjustment will be made to any Stapled Securities that remain outstanding following such conversion to reflect the reduction in the principal amount of Notes represented by each Stapled Security.

Third, if the Notes are being redeemed in connection with an Event of Loss, and such redemption does not include redemption of all of the outstanding Notes on the applicable Redemption Date, a corresponding adjustment will be made to any Stapled Securities that remain outstanding following such Redemption Date to reflect the reduction in the principal amount of notes represented by each Stapled Security.

Fourth, upon the making by the Company of any payment of PIK Interest, whether through increasing the principal amount of the outstanding Notes or through the issuance of PIK Notes under the Indenture, a corresponding adjustment will be made to each Stapled Security to reflect the increase in the principal amount of Notes represented by each Stapled Security.

Finally, upon the occurrence of a share split, share dividend, consolidation or reclassification of the Ordinary Shares, the corresponding adjustments will be made to the number of Ordinary Shares included in each Stapled Security.

Amendments

The Company and the Security Custodian (the “Security Custodian”) and Security Registrar (the “Security Registrar”), as applicable, may amend or supplement the Stapled Securities without the consent of any holder of the Stapled Securities (i) to cure any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency or (ii) to make any change that would provide any additional rights or benefits to the holders of the Stapled Securities or that in the good faith judgment of the Board of Directors of the Company does not adversely affect in any material respect the legal rights under the Stapled Securities (including, without limitation, any and all amendments or supplements necessary, advisable or desirable in the good faith judgment of the Board of Directors of the Company as a result of changes in law or regulation), provided, however, that nothing in this clause (ii) shall result in or allow for the separation of the

Ordinary Shares or the Notes from the Stapled Securities other than as contemplated under the caption “—Automatic Separation” above as in effect on the Issue Date. In addition, the Stapled Securities may be amended or supplemented with the consent of the holders of at least a majority in principal amount of the Notes then outstanding that are part of the Stapled Securities, acting in accordance with, and subject to the limitations contained in, the provisions of the Indenture described under the caption “Description of the Notes—Amendment, Supplement and Waiver” applied mutatis mutandis hereto. Any such vote shall be binding upon all holders of Stapled Securities. No separate vote of holders of the Ordinary Shares shall be required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and for the avoidance of doubt, no such amendment or supplement shall (i) alter or modify any of the terms of the Ordinary Shares or, except as specifically contemplated thereby and in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, the Notes or (ii) make any change to this provision.

Governing Law

The Stapled Securities will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.

Book Entry Settlement and Clearance

The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) will act as the securities depositary (the “Security Depositary”) for the Stapled Securities. The Notes and the Ordinary Shares represented by the Stapled Securities and the Stapled Securities were issued in fully-registered form and are represented by a global certificate to which the global Note global Ordinary Share certificates are attached. The Stapled Securities are registered in the name of DTC’s nominee Cede & Co. All global Stapled Securities will be exchanged by the Company for certificated Stapled Securities if the Company delivers to the Security Registrar and Security Custodian notice from the Security Depositary that it is unwilling or unable to continue to act as Security Depositary or that it is no longer a clearing agency registered under the Exchange Act and, in either case, a successor Security Depositary is not appointed by the Company within 90 days after the date of such notice from the Security Depositary.

Book Entry Procedures

If you intend to purchase Stapled Securities in the manner provided by this prospectus you must do so through the DTC system or through direct and indirect participants. The participant that you purchase through will receive a credit on DTC’s records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of the Stapled Securities, who we refer to as a “beneficial owner,” is to be recorded on the participant’s records.

All interests in the Stapled Securities will be subject to the operations and procedures of DTC. The following description of the operations and procedures of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream are provided solely as a matter of convenience. These operations and procedures are solely within the control of the respective settlement systems and are subject to changes by them. The Company takes no responsibility for these operations and procedures and urges investors to contact the system or their participants directly to discuss these matters.

DTC has advised the Company that DTC is a limited-purpose trust company created to hold securities for its participating organizations (collectively, the “Participants”) and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of transactions in those securities between the Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of its Participants. The Participants include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations. Access to DTC’s system is also available to other entities such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Participant, either directly or indirectly (collectively, the “Indirect Participant”). Persons who are not Participants may beneficially own securities held by or on behalf of DTC only through the Participants or the Indirect Participants. The ownership interests in, and transfers of ownership interests in, each security held by or on behalf of DTC are recorded on the records of the Participants and Indirect Participants.

DTC has also advised the Company that, pursuant to procedures established by it, ownership of interests in the Stapled Securities will be shown on, and the transfer of ownership of these interests will be effected only through, records maintained by DTC (with respect to the Participants) or by the Participants and the Indirect Participants (with respect to other owners of beneficial interest in the Stapled Securities).

All interests in Stapled Securities, including those held through Euroclear or Clearstream, may be subject to the procedures and requirements of DTC. Those interests held through Euroclear or Clearstream may also be subject to the procedures and requirements of such systems. The laws of some states require that certain Persons take physical delivery in definitive form of securities that they own. Consequently, the ability to transfer beneficial interests in a global Stapled Security to such Persons will be limited to that extent.

Because DTC can act only on behalf of the Participants, which in turn act on behalf of the Indirect Participants, the ability of a Person having beneficial interests in a global Stapled Security to pledge such interests to Persons that do not participate in the DTC system, or otherwise take actions in respect of such interests, may be affected by the lack of a physical certificate evidencing such interests.

Except as described below, owners of interests in the Stapled Securities will not have Stapled Securities registered in their names, will not receive physical delivery of Stapled Securities in certificated form and will not be considered the registered owners or “holders” thereof under the Indenture for any purpose.

Payments in respect of Stapled Securities (or the underlying Ordinary Shares and Notes) registered in the name of DTC or its nominee will be payable to DTC in its capacity as the registered holder thereof. Under the terms of the Indenture, the Company and the Trustee will treat the Persons in whose names the Stapled Securities, including the global Stapled Securities, are registered as the owners of the Stapled Securities for the purpose of receiving payments and for all other purposes. Consequently, neither the Company, the Trustee nor any agent of the Company or the Trustee has or will have any responsibility or liability for:

(a) any aspect of DTC’s records or any Participant’s or Indirect Participant’s records relating to, or payments made on account of, beneficial ownership interest in the Stapled Securities or the underlying Ordinary Shares and Notes) or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any of DTC’s records or any Participant’s or Indirect Participant’s records relating to the beneficial ownership interests in the Stapled Securities; or

(b) any other matter relating to the actions and practices of DTC or any of its Participants, or Indirect Participants.

DTC has advised the Company that its current practice, upon receipt of any payment in respect of securities such as the Stapled Securities (or the underlying Ordinary Shares and Notes), is to credit the accounts of the relevant Participants with the payment on the payment date unless DTC has reason to believe that it will not receive payment on such payment date. Each relevant Participant is credited with an amount proportionate to its beneficial ownership of the Stapled Securities as shown on the records of DTC. Payments by the Participants and the Indirect Participants to the beneficial owners of Stapled Securities will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices and will be the responsibility of the Participants or the Indirect Participants and will not be the responsibility of DTC, the Trustee or the Company. Neither the Company nor the Trustee will be liable for any delay by DTC or any of the Participants or the Indirect Participants in identifying the beneficial owners of the Stapled Securities, and the Company and the Trustee may conclusively rely on and will be protected in relying on instructions from DTC or its nominee for all purposes.

We or the Trustee will be responsible for the payment of all amounts to DTC and the transfer agent. The transfer agent will be responsible for the disbursement of those payments to DTC. DTC will be responsible for the disbursement of those payments to its participants, and the participants will be responsible for disbursements of those payments to beneficial owners. We will remain responsible for any actions DTC and participants take in accordance with instructions we provide.

Transfers between the Participants will be effected in accordance with DTC’s procedures, and will be settled in same-day funds, and transfers between participants in Euroclear and Clearstream will be effected in accordance with their respective rules and operating procedures.

100

Cross-market transfers between the Participants, on the one hand, and Euroclear or Clearstream participants, on the other hand, will be effected through DTC in accordance with DTC’s rules on behalf of Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, by their respective depositaries; however, such cross-market transactions will require delivery of instructions to Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, by the counterparty in such system in accordance with the rules and procedures and within the established deadlines (Brussels time) of such system. Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, will, if the transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its respective depositary to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving interests in the global Stapled Security in DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Euroclear participants and Clearstream participants may not deliver instructions directly to the depositories for Euroclear or Clearstream.

DTC has advised the Company that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of Stapled Securities, or the underlying Notes or Ordinary Shares comprising the Stapled Securities, only at the direction of one or more Participants to whose account DTC has credited the interests in the global Stapled Securities and only in respect of such Stapled Securities as to which such Participant or Participants has or have given such direction.

None of the Company, the Trustee and any of their respective agents will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream or their respective participants or indirect participants of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.

Security Registrar & Security Custodian

U.S. Bank National Association is the Security Registrar and Security Custodian for the Stapled Securities.

101

DESCRIPTION OF SHARE CAPITAL

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and our affairs are governed by our Third Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (as further amended or restated from time to time, the “Memorandum and Articles”), the Companies Law (2013 Revision) of the Cayman Islands (as amended from time to time, the “Companies Law”) and the common law of the Cayman Islands.

The following description of our share capital, together with the additional information we may include in any prospectus supplements (which may differ from the terms summarized below), summarizes the material terms and provisions of our share capital that we may offer under this prospectus. For the complete terms of our share capital, please refer to our Memorandum and Articles, which are filed as an exhibit to the registration statement that includes this prospectus.

Description of Ordinary Shares

We are currently authorized to issue 50,000,000 ordinary shares (the “Ordinary Shares”) with a par value of US$0.001 per share. As of August 15, 2016, we had 5,000,053 Ordinary Shares issued and outstanding.

All outstanding Ordinary Shares are fully paid and non-assessable. Our Ordinary Shares are issued in registered form and are issued when registered in the register of members (shareholders) of the Company.

Voting Rights. Our shareholders may freely hold and vote their shares. At a general meeting of the Company, on a show of hands every shareholder who (being an individual) is present in person or by proxy or, if a corporation or other non-natural person is present by its duly authorized representative or proxy, shall have one vote and on a poll every shareholder shall have one vote for every share of which he is the holder.

Shareholders holding at least a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company shall be a quorum unless the Company has only one shareholder entitled to vote at such general meeting in which case the quorum shall be that one shareholder present in person or by proxy or (in the case of a corporation or other non-natural person) by a duly authorized representative or proxy.

Shareholders’ meetings shall be held annually in May of each year or at such time as may be determined by the directors. Shareholders’ meetings may be convened by our board of directors on its own initiative or upon a request to the directors by shareholders holding in aggregate at least ten percent in par value of the capital of the Company which carries the right to vote. Advance notice to shareholders of at least ten calendar days (but not more than sixty calendar days) is required for the convening of any shareholders’ meeting. No business may be transacted at general meetings of shareholders other than business specified in the notice of the meeting, which is otherwise properly brought at the direction of our board of directors or, in the case of an annual general meeting, relates to the nomination for election of a director made by our shareholders.

An ordinary resolution to be passed by the shareholders requires a simple majority of votes cast in a general meeting, while a special resolution requires no less than two-thirds of the votes cast. A special resolution is required for certain important matters prescribed by the Companies Law, such as a change of name or making any changes to our Memorandum and Articles. Both any ordinary resolution and special resolution may be passed by a unanimous written resolution. Our shareholders may effect certain changes by ordinary resolution, including increasing the amount of our authorized share capital, consolidating and dividing all or any of our share capital into shares of larger amounts than our existing shares and canceling any shares.

Our Memorandum and Articles do not provide for cumulative voting rights.

Dividends. The holders of our Ordinary Shares are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the directors out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends in accordance with the Companies Law and the Memorandum and Articles. We have not paid any dividends on our Ordinary Shares.

Directors. The Company shall have a board of up to seven directors.

Appointment and Removal of Directors. Until the time of the 2016 annual general meeting of the Company, directors shall be elected by the existing directors. At the annual general meeting of the Company to be held in 2016, all incumbent directors shall be removed from their positions as directors and new directors shall be elected for a term of office to expire at the next annual general meeting of the Company. At each subsequent annual general meeting of the Company, directors shall be elected for a term of office to expire at the next annual general meeting of the Company. The directors may appoint any person to be a director to fill a vacancy. Our Memorandum and Articles set out the procedure by which a shareholder may nominate a person for election as a director at an annual general meeting.

Calls on Shares and Forfeiture of Shares. The directors may make calls upon the shareholders for any monies unpaid on their Ordinary Shares in a notice served to such shareholders at least 14 calendar days prior to the specified time of payment, and each shareholder must pay to the Company the amount called on the Ordinary Shares. The shares that have been called upon and remain unpaid at the specified time are subject to forfeiture.

102

Winding Up. On the winding up of the Company, if the assets available for distribution amongst our shareholders shall be more than sufficient to repay the whole of the share capital at the commencement of the winding up, the surplus shall be distributed amongst our shareholders in proportion to the par value of the shares held by them at the commencement of the winding up, subject to a deduction from those shares in respect of which there are monies due. If our assets available for distribution are insufficient to repay all of the paid-up capital, the assets will be distributed so that the losses are borne by our shareholders in proportion to the par value of the shares held by them.

Transfer of the Ordinary Shares. The Ordinary Shares are transferable and the directors have no discretion to decline to register any transfer of the Ordinary Shares.

Ordinary Shares held by shareholders party to the Shareholders Agreement by and among the Company and the holders party thereto are subject to certain additional restrictions on transfer set forth in the Shareholders Agreement. Ordinary Shares held by shareholders party to the Shareholders Agreement are also subject to certain tag-along and drag-along rights set forth in the Shareholders Agreement. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Shareholders Agreement.”

Redemption of Shares. Subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, we may issue shares on terms that are subject to redemption, at our option or at the option of the shareholders, in such manner as may be determined by special resolution before the issue of the shares.

Variation of Rights of Shares. If at any time our share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class of shares (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class) may be varied either with the consent in writing of the holders of three-quarters of the issued shares of that class, or with the sanction of a special resolution passed at a general meeting of the holders of the shares of that class. The rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class issued with preferred or other rights shall not, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class, be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking pari passu therewith.

Inspection of Books and Records. Holders of our Ordinary Shares will have no general right to inspect or obtain copies of our list of shareholders or our corporate records. However, we will provide our shareholders with annual audited financial statements. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information.”

Directors’ Liability; Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Under the Memorandum and Articles any director or officer of the Company shall be indemnified out of the assets of the Company against any liability incurred by him as a result of any act or failure to act in carrying out his functions other than such liability (if any) that such director may incur by his own actual fraud or willful default. No such director or officer shall be liable to the Company for any loss or damage in carrying out his functions unless that liability arises through the actual fraud or willful default of such director or officer. References in the relevant article in the Memorandum and Articles to actual fraud or willful default mean a finding to such effect by a competent court in relation to the conduct of the relevant party.

103

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our Ordinary Shares is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, which maintains the register of members of the Company.

National Securities Exchange Listing

Our Ordinary Shares are not listed on any national securities exchange and there can be no assurance that our Ordinary Shares will achieve a listing on a national securities exchange.

Comparison of Cayman Islands Corporate Law and U.S. Corporate Law

Cayman Islands companies are governed by the Companies Law. The Companies Law is modeled on English Law but does not follow recent English Law statutory enactments, and differs from laws applicable to United States corporations and their shareholders. Set forth below is a summary of the material differences between the provisions of the Companies Law applicable to us and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders.

Mergers and Similar Arrangements. In certain circumstances the Cayman Islands Companies Law allows for mergers or consolidations between two Cayman Islands companies, or between a Cayman Islands company and a company incorporated in another jurisdiction (provided that is facilitated by the laws of that other jurisdiction).

Where the merger or consolidation is between two Cayman Islands companies, the directors of each company must approve a written plan of merger or consolidation containing certain prescribed information. That plan or merger or consolidation must then be authorized by either (a) a special resolution (usually a majority of 66 2/3 % in value) of the shareholders of each company; or (b) such other authorization, if any, as may be specified in such constituent company’s articles of association. A shareholder has the right to vote on a merger or consolidation regardless of whether the shares that he holds otherwise give him voting rights. No shareholder resolution is required for a merger between a parent company (i.e., a company that owns at least 90% of the issued shares of each class in a subsidiary company) and its subsidiary company. The consent of each holder of a fixed or floating security interest of a constituent company must be obtained, unless the court waives such requirement. If the Cayman Islands Registrar of Companies is satisfied that the requirements of the Companies Law (which includes certain other formalities) have been complied with, the Registrar of Companies will register the plan of merger or consolidation.

104

Where the merger or consolidation involves a foreign company, the procedure is similar, save that with respect to the foreign company, the director of the Cayman Islands company is required to make a declaration to the effect that, having made due enquiry, he is of the opinion that the requirements set out below have been met: (i) that the merger or consolidation is permitted or not prohibited by the constitutional documents of the foreign company and by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the foreign company is incorporated, and that those laws and any requirements of those constitutional documents have been or will be complied with; (ii) that no petition or other similar proceeding has been filed and remains outstanding or order made or resolution adopted to wind up or liquidate the foreign company in any jurisdictions; (iii) that no receiver, trustee, administrator or other similar person has been appointed in any jurisdiction and is acting in respect of the foreign company, its affairs or its property or any part thereof; (iv) that no scheme, order, compromise or other similar arrangement has been entered into or made in any jurisdiction whereby the rights of creditors of the foreign company are and continue to be suspended or restricted.

Where the surviving company is the Cayman Islands company, the director of the Cayman Islands company is further required to make a declaration to the effect that, having made due enquiry, he is of the opinion that the requirements set out below have been met: (i) that the foreign company is able to pay its debts as they fall due and that the merger or consolidated is bona fide and not intended to defraud unsecured creditors of the foreign company; (ii) that in respect of the transfer of any security interest granted by the foreign company to the surviving or consolidated company (a) consent or approval to the transfer has been obtained, released or waived; (b) the transfer is permitted by and has been approved in accordance with the constitutional documents of the foreign company; and (c) the laws of the jurisdiction of the foreign company with respect to the transfer have been or will be complied with; (iii) that the foreign company will, upon the merger or consolidation becoming effective, cease to be incorporated, registered or exist under the laws of the relevant foreign jurisdiction; and (iv) that there is no other reason why it would be against the public interest to permit the merger or consolidation.

Where the above procedures are adopted, the Companies Law provides for a right of dissenting shareholders to be paid a payment of the fair value of his shares upon their dissenting to the merger or consolidation if they follow a prescribed procedure. In essence, that procedure is as follows (a) the shareholder must give his written objection to the merger or consolidation to the constituent company before the vote on the merger or consolidation, including a statement that the shareholder proposes to demand payment for his shares if the merger or consolidation is authorized by the vote; (b) within 20 days following the date on which the merger or consolidation is approved by the shareholders, the constituent company must give written notice to each shareholder who made a written objection; (c) a shareholder must within 20 days following receipt of such notice from the constituent company, give the constituent company a written notice of his intention to dissent including, among other details, a demand for payment of the fair value of his shares; (d) within seven days following the date of the expiration of the period set out in paragraph (b) above or seven days following the date on which the plan of merger or consolidation is filed, whichever is later, the constituent company, the surviving company or the consolidated company must make a written offer to each dissenting shareholder to purchase his shares at a price that the company determines is the fair value and if the company and the shareholder agree the price within 30 days following the date on which the offer was made, the company must pay the shareholder such amount; (e) if the company and the shareholder fail to agree a price within such 30 day period, within 20 days following the date on which such 30 day period expires, the company (and any dissenting shareholder) must file a petition with the Cayman Islands Grand Court to determine the fair value and such petition must be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the dissenting shareholders with whom agreements as to the fair value of their shares have not been reached by the company. At the hearing of that petition, the court has the power to determine the fair value of the shares together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid by the company upon the amount determined to be the fair value. Any dissenting shareholder whose name appears on the list filed by the company may participate fully in all proceedings until the determination of fair value is reached. These rights of a dissenting shareholder are not available in certain circumstances, for example, to dissenters holding shares of any class in respect of which an open market exists on a recognized stock exchange or recognized interdealer quotation system at the relevant date or where the consideration for such shares to be contributed are shares of any company listed on a national securities exchange or shares of the surviving or consolidated company.

105

Moreover, Cayman Islands law also has separate statutory provisions that facilitate the reconstruction or amalgamation of companies in certain circumstances, schemes of arrangement will generally be more suited for complex mergers or other transactions involving widely held companies, commonly referred to in the Cayman Islands as a “scheme of arrangement” which may be tantamount to a merger. In the event that a merger was sought pursuant to a scheme of arrangement (the procedure of which are more rigorous and take longer to complete than the procedures typically required to consummate a merger in the United States), the arrangement in question must be approved by a majority in number of each class of shareholders and creditors with whom the arrangement is to be made and who must in addition represent three-fourths in value of each such class of shareholders or creditors, as the case may be, that are present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting, or meeting summoned for that purpose. The convening of the meetings and subsequently the terms of the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. While a dissenting shareholder would have the right to express to the court the view that the transaction should not be approved, the court can be expected to approve the arrangement if it satisfies itself that:

•

we are not proposing to act illegally or beyond the scope of our corporate authority and the statutory provisions as to majority vote have been complied with;

•

the shareholders have been fairly represented at the meeting in question;

•

the arrangement is such as a businessman would reasonably approve; and

•

the arrangement is not one that would more properly be sanctioned under some other provision of the Companies Law or that would amount to a “fraud on the minority.”

If a scheme of arrangement or takeover offer (as described below) is approved, any dissenting shareholder would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights, which would otherwise ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of United States corporations, providing rights to receive payment in cash for the judicially determined value of the shares.

Squeeze-out Provisions. When a takeover offer is made and accepted by holders of 90% of the shares to whom the offer is made within four months, the offeror may, within a two-month period, require the holders of the remaining shares to transfer such shares on the terms of the offer. An objection can be made to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands but this is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith, collusion or inequitable treatment of the shareholders.

Further, transactions similar to a merger, reconstruction and/or an amalgamation may in some circumstances be achieved through other means to these statutory provisions, such as a share capital exchange, asset acquisition or control, through contractual arrangements, of an operating business.

Shareholders’ Suits. Our Cayman Islands counsel is not aware of any reported class action having been brought in a Cayman Islands court. Derivative actions have been brought in the Cayman Islands courts, and the Cayman Islands courts have confirmed the availability for such actions. In most cases, we will be the proper plaintiff in any claim based on a breach of duty owed to us, and a claim against (for example) our officers or directors usually may not be brought by a shareholder. However, based on English authorities, which would in all likelihood be of persuasive authority and be applied by a court in the Cayman Islands, exceptions to the foregoing principle apply in circumstances in which:

•

a company is acting, or proposing to act, illegally or beyond the scope of its authority;

•

the act complained of, although not beyond the scope of the authority, could be effected if duly authorized by more than the number of votes which have actually been obtained; or

•

those who control the company are perpetrating a “fraud on the minority.”

A shareholder may have a direct right of action against us where the individual rights of that shareholder have been infringed or are about to be infringed.

106

DESCRIPTION OF THE NOTES

The following description is a summary of the material provisions of the Indenture under which we issued the Notes and the related note guarantees (the “Note Guarantees”). The following description also contains a summary of the Collateral Agreements we entered into in connection with the issuance of the Notes. This summary does not restate those agreements in their entirety. We urge you to read those agreements because they, and not this description, will define your rights as holders of the Notes. Copies of the Indenture, the Note Guarantees and the Collateral Agreements, including the Intercreditor Agreements, are available as set forth below under “—Additional Information.” You can find the definitions of certain terms used in this descriptor below under the subheading “—Certain Definitions.” In this description, the “Company” refers only to Vantage Drilling International, a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability, and any successor.

Brief Description of the Notes and the Note Guarantees

On February 10, 2016 (the “Issue Date”), the Company issued the Notes under the Indenture with the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Noteholder Collateral Agent (as amended, the “Indenture”). The terms of the Notes include those stated in the Indenture and those made part of the Indenture by reference to the TIA.

The Notes were issued in fully-registered form, without coupons, and are represented by one or more global Notes registered in the name of Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and will be attached to the related Stapled Security. See “Description of Stapled Securities—Book Entry Settlement and Clearance.”

The Notes are:

•

senior secured obligations of the Company;

•

subordinated in right of payment to the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes pursuant to the provisions of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement;

•

equal in right of payment with all of the Company’s other existing and future senior indebtedness;

•

senior in right of payment to any of the Company’s future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes;

•

effectively senior to any of the Company’s unsecured indebtedness, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing the Notes and the Note Guarantees;

•

effectively junior to all of the Company’s existing and future first-priority and second-priority senior secured indebtedness (including, for the avoidance of doubt, the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes), to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness; and

•

unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured third priority basis by the Guarantors.

The Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured third priority basis by each of the Company’s existing and future Subsidiaries (other than Immaterial Subsidiaries), including any existing and future Subsidiaries that guarantee Obligations under any Credit Facility. The Note Guarantees are:

•

senior secured obligations of the Guarantors;

•

subordinated in right of payment to the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes pursuant to the provisions of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement;

•

equal in right of payment with all of the Guarantors’ other existing and future senior indebtedness;

•

senior in right of payment to any of the Guarantors’ future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes;

107

•

effectively senior to any of the Guarantors’ unsecured indebtedness, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing the Note Guarantees; and

•

effectively junior to all of the Guarantors’ existing and future first-priority and second-priority senior secured indebtedness (including, for the avoidance of doubt, the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes), to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness.

The Notes will be convertible into our ordinary shares as described below under “—Conversion Rights,” based upon the Initial Conversion Rate of approximately 0.01046 ordinary shares per $1.00 principal amount of Notes (equivalent to the Initial Conversion Price of $95.60 per ordinary share). The conversion rate will be adjusted as described under “Conversion Rights—Conversion Rate Adjustment.”

Following the completion of a pre-packaged plan of reorganization (the “Plan of Reorganization”) under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on February 10, 2016, we had approximately $969.1 million aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding, consisting of $143.0 million under the Credit Agreement, $76.1 million of our Senior Secured Notes and approximately $750.0 million of the Notes. Subject to the restrictions in the Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our Senior Secured Notes and the Notes, we may incur additional indebtedness.

The registered holder of a Note is treated as the owner of it for all purposes. Only registered holders have rights under the Indenture.

Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries

On the Issue Date, all of the Company’s Subsidiaries were “Restricted Subsidiaries.”

Under the circumstances described below under the caption “—Certain Covenants—Designation of Restricted and Unrestricted Subsidiaries,” the Board of Directors of the Company is permitted to designate certain of the Company’s Restricted Subsidiaries or newly created or acquired Subsidiaries, if any, as Unrestricted Subsidiaries. Unrestricted Subsidiaries are not be subject to many of the restrictive covenants in the Indenture and do not guarantee the Notes.

Principal, Maturity and Interest

The Company issued approximately $750.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Notes on the Issue Date. The Company may issue additional Notes under the Indenture from time to time, subject to the limitations contained in the Indenture. Any issuance of additional Notes will be subject to all of the covenants in the Indenture. The Notes and any additional Notes subsequently issued under the Indenture will be treated as a single class for all purposes under the Indenture, including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, redemptions and offers to purchase. The Notes are in minimum denominations of $1.00 and integral multiples of $0.01 in excess thereof, except as otherwise provided in the Indenture, and are attached to the related Stapled Security.

The aggregate principal amount of the Notes that may be issued under the Indenture may not exceed the sum of (i) the Initial Notes and (ii) the maximum principal amount of Notes (the “Additional Notes”) that may be issued pursuant to awards granted from time to time under the Management Incentive Plan, such maximum principal amount to be determined in accordance with the terms of the Management Incentive Plan as in effect on the Issue Date provided that nothing in this sentence shall restrict (i) the payment of PIK Interest, (ii) the increasing of the principal amount of the Notes in connection with the payment of PIK Interest or (iii) the issuance of PIK Notes in accordance with the terms of the Indenture. Additional Notes shall be issued in minimum denominations of the Current Principal Amount of Notes per Unit at the time any such Additional Notes are issued, such denomination not to be less than $1.00, and integral multiples of $0.01in excess thereof, and will be attached to the related Stapled Security.

Interest on the Notes will accrue at the rate of 1.0% per year prior to the fourth anniversary of the Issue Date, and will be payable in kind, semi-annually in arrears on June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing on June 30, 2016 (each, an “Interest Payment Date”). From and after the fourth anniversary of the Issue Date, interest on the Notes will accrue at the rate of 12.0% per year and will be payable in kind, semi-annually in arrears on each

108

Interest Payment Date. Interest on overdue principal and interest will accrue at a rate that is 1.0% higher than the then applicable interest rate on the Notes. All interest payments will be made as PIK Interest; provided, that, for any Notes that have not been converted into Ordinary Shares in accordance with the provisions described under the caption “—Conversion Rights” prior to the Maturity Date, the final interest payment on the Maturity Date will be made in cash. The Company will make each interest payment to the holders of record on the immediately preceding June 15 and December 15 (each a “Record Date”). Interest on the Notes will accrue for any additional Notes from the date of original issuance or, if interest has already been paid, from the date it was most recently paid; provided, however, that solely for purposes of the accrual of interest, additional Notes issued after the Issue Date will be deemed to have been outstanding as of the later of the Issue Date or the most recent Interest Payment Date. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve 30-day months. For the avoidance of doubt, all references to “interest” mean the initial interest rate borne by the Notes and any increases in that rate to the extent overdue interest accrues on the Notes, any Default Interest as set forth under “—Events of Default and Remedies.”

In connection with the payment of PIK Interest in respect of the Notes, the Company shall increase the outstanding principal amount of the Notes outstanding under the Indenture. If the Company is prohibited by the requirements of the depository or law from paying PIK Interest by increasing the outstanding principal amount of the Notes outstanding under the Indenture, the Company shall issue additional Notes (“PIK Notes”) under the Indenture on the same terms and conditions as the Notes issued on the Issue Date (other than the issuance dates, denominations and the date from which interest will accrue).

The Company will pay interest (including post-petition interest in any proceeding under any Bankruptcy Law) on overdue principal, premium (including the Applicable Premium), if any, and interest (without regard to any applicable grace period) from time to time on demand at the rate equal to 1% per annum in excess of the then applicable interest rate on the Notes to the extent lawful to the Persons who are holders on a subsequent special record date, in each case at the rate provided as set forth in the Notes (“Default Interest”). All references herein to “interest” shall mean the initial interest rate borne by the Notes plus any Default Interest.

All references herein to Notes shall include any Additional Notes and PIK Notes, references to “principal amount” of the Notes shall include any increase in the principal amount of any outstanding Notes as a result of a payment of PIK Interest.

Methods of Receiving Payments on and Converting the Notes

Payments of principal of and premium (including the Applicable Premium), if any, and any amount payable in cash on the Notes will be made at the office or agency of the paying agent and registrar unless the Company elects to make payments by check mailed to the holders at their address set forth in the register of holders; provided that all payments of principal of and premium (including the Applicable Premium), if any, and any amount payable in cash on the Notes represented by one or more global Notes registered in the name of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) or its nominee will be made by the paying agent by wire transfer of immediately available funds to the accounts specified by the holder or holders thereof.

The Notes may be presented for conversion at the office or agency of the conversion agent.

Paying Agent, Registrar and Conversion Agent for the Notes

U.S. Bank National Association is acting as paying agent, registrar and conversion agent. The Company may change the paying agent, registrar or conversion agent without prior notice to the holders of the Notes, and the Company or any of its Subsidiaries may act as paying agent, registrar or conversion agent.

Transfer and Exchange

A holder may transfer or exchange Notes in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. The registrar and the Trustee may require a holder, among other things, to furnish appropriate endorsements and transfer documents in connection with a transfer of Notes. Holders are required to pay all taxes due on transfer. The registrar is not required to transfer or exchange any Note selected for redemption. Also, the Company is not required to transfer or exchange any Note for a period of 15 days before a selection of Notes to be redeemed.

Tax Treatment

The Notes, being deemed stapled to the Ordinary Shares of the Company as components of the Stapled Securities and thus transferrable or exchangeable only together as part of a Stapled Security (unless separated in accordance with the terms thereof in the limited circumstances specified in such Stapled Security), are intended to be treated as common stock of the Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company, the Guarantors, the Trustee, the Noteholder Collateral Agent and the holders of the Notes will treat the Notes and Ordinary Shares, together as components of the Stapled Securities, as common stock of the Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes (subject to definitive guidance from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or a court of competent jurisdiction to the contrary). To the extent permitted by applicable law, all of the foregoing will report consistent therewith for U.S. state and local income tax purposes.

109

Note Guarantees

The Notes are guaranteed on a senior secured third priority basis by each of the Company’s existing and future Subsidiaries (other than Immaterial Subsidiaries) who also guarantee the Credit Agreement or the obligations of the Company or any Guarantor under any Credit Facility. After the Credit Agreement ceases to be outstanding, the Notes will be guaranteed on a senior secured third priority basis by (a) any newly acquired or created Restricted Subsidiary other than an Immaterial Subsidiary, (b) any Restricted Subsidiary that is an Immaterial Subsidiary that ceases to be an Immaterial Subsidiary, and (c) any Subsidiary of the Company that is not already a Guarantor that guarantees any Credit Facility, owns any Vessel, is subject of a Contract Winning Trigger or becomes an Internal Charterer. The Note Guarantees are joint and several obligations of the Guarantors. The obligations of each Guarantor under its Note Guarantee are limited as necessary to prevent that Note Guarantee from constituting a fraudulent conveyance under applicable law. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Investment in our Company’s Securities—U.S. federal, state and foreign fraudulent transfer laws may permit a court to void the Notes and the guarantees, subordinate claims in respect of the Notes and the guarantees and require holders of the Notes to return payments received. If this occurs, holders of the Notes may not receive any payments on the Notes.” If the Note Guarantee of a Guarantor is determined to be a fraudulent conveyance, holders of the Notes may not receive any payment on the Notes.

A Guarantor may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets to, consolidate with or merge with or into (whether or not such Guarantor is the surviving Person) another Person, other than the Company or another Guarantor, unless:

(1)

immediately after giving effect to that transaction, no Default or Event of Default exists; and

(2)

either:

(a)

the Person acquiring the property in any such sale or disposition or the Person formed by or surviving any such consolidation or merger assumes all the obligations of that Guarantor under the Indenture, the Note Guarantees and the other Obligations under the Indenture and the Collateral Agreements, as applicable, pursuant to a supplemental indenture or an amendment thereto reasonably satisfactory to the Trustee and the Noteholder Collateral Agent; or

(b)

the Net Proceeds of such sale or other disposition are applied in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Indenture and the Collateral Agreements,

provided, however, that the transfer, sale or other disposition, directly or indirectly, of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries, taken as a whole will be governed by the “Merger, Consolidation; Sale of Assets” and “Asset Sales” covenants and may be subject to the “Change of Control” covenant.

The Note Guarantee of a Guarantor will be released:

(1)

in connection with any sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of that Guarantor (including by way of merger or consolidation) to a Person that is not (either before or after giving effect to such transaction) the Company, a Guarantor or a Restricted Subsidiary, if the sale or other disposition does not violate the “Merger, Consolidation; Sale of Assets” or “Asset Sales” covenants and complies with the Collateral Agreements;

(2)

in connection with any sale or other disposition of all of the Capital Stock of that Guarantor to a Person that is not (either before or after giving effect to such transaction) the Company, a Guarantor or a Restricted Subsidiary, if the sale or other disposition does not violate the “Merger, Consolidation; Sale of Assets” or “Asset Sales” provisions of the Indenture and complies with the Collateral Agreements;

(3)

if the Company designates any Restricted Subsidiary that is a Guarantor to be an Unrestricted Subsidiary in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Indenture;

110

(4)

upon legal defeasance or satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture as provided below under the captions “—Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance” and “—Satisfaction and Discharge”;

(5)

as provided in the Intercreditor Agreements or any other intercreditor agreement entered into in accordance with the terms of the Indenture; or

(6)

to the extent that any Subsidiary of the Company that was not already a Guarantor became a Guarantor solely because it was the subject of a Contract Winning Trigger, following the occurrence of a Contract Unwind Trigger provided that the conditions to that release are satisfied.

Security

Collateral Agreements

The Note Obligations will be secured by a Required Priority Lien on the Equity Interests of the Company and substantially all of the existing and future property and assets of the Company and the Guarantors, including the following:

(1)

(a) the Emerald Driller, the Sapphire Driller, the Topaz Driller and the Aquamarine Driller under Ship Mortgages dated February 10, 2016, and (b) the Platinum Explorer, the Titanium Explorer and the Tungsten Explorer under Ship Mortgages dated February 10, 2016, with related Deeds of Covenant dated February 10, 2016 as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto;

(2)

all other assets of the Company and the Guarantors, which will include accounts receivable (and supporting obligations related to the payment or performance thereof), general intangibles and equipment;

(3)

assignments of all insurance in respect of the Vessels and other applicable insurance of the Company and the Guarantors in respect of other Collateral;

(4)

assignments of the earnings of the Company or any Guarantor or Internal Charterer that is party to a Drilling Contract; and

(5)

the Equity Interests of the Guarantors.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Collateral will not include (i) any accounts, contracts, licenses or other general intangibles, or any permits, instruments, promissory notes or chattel paper, if and to the extent such account, contract, license, general intangible, permit, instrument, promissory note or chattel paper contains restrictions on assignments and/or the creation of Liens, or under which such an assignment or Lien would cause a default to occur under, or a termination pursuant to the terms of, such account, contract, license, general intangible, permit, instrument, promissory note or chattel paper (other than to the extent that any such term would be rendered ineffective pursuant to Section 9-406, 9-407, 9-408 or 9- 409 of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code of any relevant jurisdiction or any other applicable law or principles of equity); provided, that immediately upon the ineffectiveness, invalidity, lapse or termination of any such provisions, the Collateral will include such accounts, contracts, licenses, general intangibles, permits, instruments, promissory notes or chattel paper, as applicable, (ii) titled vehicles the perfection of security interest in which is excluded from the Uniform Commercial Code in the relevant jurisdiction and that constitute passenger vehicles, light trucks (such as crew trucks with rated capacities ranging from one-half ton to one ton) and forklifts, (iii) rental equipment the title to which is held by a third party, to the extent not prohibited under the Indenture or any Indenture Document, and (iv) property and assets owned by the Company or any Guarantor in which a Lien may not be granted without governmental approval or consent or in which the granting of a Lien is prohibited by applicable law (but only for so long as the Company or such other Guarantor has not obtained such approval or consent).

In addition, the Indenture, and the applicable Collateral Agreements, provide that any capital stock and other securities of any of the Guarantors will be excluded from the Collateral to the extent the pledge of such capital stock or other securities to secure the Notes would cause such Guarantor to be required to file separate financial statements with the SEC pursuant to Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X (as in effect from time to time).

111

The Liens will secure the payment and performance when due of all of the Note Obligations of the Company and the Guarantors, in each case as provided in the Collateral Agreements.

If property of a type constituting Collateral is acquired by the Company or any Guarantor that is not automatically subject to a Lien or perfected security interest under the Collateral Agreements or there is a new Guarantor, then the Company or such Guarantor will, as soon as practicable after such property’s acquisition or such Subsidiary becoming a Guarantor and in any event within 20 business days or as soon as practicable where applicable local law requires additional time for compliance with applicable legal requirements, grant Liens having Required Priority on such property (or, in the case of a new Guarantor, all of its assets constituting the type that is Collateral) in favor of the Third Lien Claimholders and deliver certain certificates (including in the case of real property, title insurance) in respect thereof as required by the Indenture or the Collateral Agreements and take all necessary steps to perfect the security interest represented by such Liens.

So long as no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, and subject to the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement and certain other terms and conditions, the Company and the Guarantors will be entitled to receive all cash dividends, principal, interest and other payments made upon or with respect to the Collateral pledged by them and to exercise any voting and other consensual rights pertaining to the Collateral pledged by them, except in connection with a sale of any such Collateral which will be governed by the Intercreditor Agreements and the Indenture, including the “Merger, Consolidation; Sale of Assets” and “Asset Sales” covenants and the provisions of the Collateral Agreements as set forth under “—Release of Liens.”

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement and the other Collateral Agreements, upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of Default:

(1)

all rights of the Company and the Guarantors to exercise such voting or other consensual rights will cease, and all such rights will become vested in the Noteholder Collateral Agent, which, to the extent permitted by law, will have the sole right to exercise such voting and other consensual rights;

(2)

all rights of the Company and the Guarantors to receive all cash dividends, principal, interest and other payments made upon or with respect to the Collateral will cease and such cash dividends, principal, interest and other payments will be paid to the Noteholder Collateral Agent; and

(3)

the Noteholder Collateral Agent may sell the Collateral or any part of the Collateral in accordance with the terms of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement and the Collateral Agreements.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, at any time that an Event of Default has occurred and be continuing, the Noteholder Collateral Agent will apply (or turn over to the applicable Third Lien Claimholder for application) all or any part of the proceeds of any collection or sale of the Collateral, and any Collateral consisting of cash, including any proceeds of any Note Guarantee, in payment of the Notes Obligations in the order set forth in the Indenture or Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement.

Intercreditor Agreements

On the Issue Date, the obligations of the Company and the Guarantors under the Indenture were secured on a third-priority subordinated basis.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes, U.S. Bank National Association, as Third Lien Representative and Noteholder Collateral Agent, entered into the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement. The Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement governs the relative rights, duties, authority and responsibilities of the First Lien Collateral Agent, the Second Lien Collateral Agent and the Noteholder Collateral Agent, and the relationship among the First Lien Claimholders, Second Lien Claimholders and Third Lien Claimholders with respect to their interests in the Collateral.

The Company and the Guarantors, together with the First Lien Collateral Agent and the Second Lien Collateral Agent, are also currently party to the Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement. The Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement governs the relative rights, duties, authority and responsibilities of the First Lien Collateral Agent and Second Lien Collateral Agent and the relationship among the First Lien Claimholders and Second Lien Claimholders with respect to their interests in the Collateral.

112

Subordination of Note Obligations

The Noteholder Collateral Agent, for itself and on behalf of each Third Lien Claimholder, for the benefit of each Senior Representative, each Senior Collateral Agent and each Senior Claimholder, agreed in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement that notwithstanding applicable law to the contrary, whether under the Uniform Commercial Code or otherwise, and anything in the Indenture Documents to the contrary and regardless of the manner or order or time of any filing, recording, attachment or perfection (if any), the Note Obligations are subordinated in right of payment, operation, distribution and Lien (whether by way of judicial or non-judicial sale, foreclosure or otherwise) to the Senior Obligations and any Lien granted thereby or thereunder or otherwise made in favor of any Senior Claimholder, such that the holders of the Senior Obligations will be entitled to receive payment in full in cash of the amounts constituting the Senior Obligations before the Third Lien Claimholders are entitled to receive any payment on account of the Note Obligations other than Permitted Note Obligation Payments and Reorganization Securities permitted to be retained by the Third Lien Claimholders pursuant to the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement.

Restriction on Enforcement of Liens

The Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement provides that, until the discharge of Senior Obligations has occurred, whether or not any bankruptcy case has been commenced by or against the Company or any Guarantor, the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent and the Third Lien Claimholders:

(1) will not commence or maintain, or seek to commence or maintain, any enforcement action or otherwise exercise any rights or remedies with respect to the Collateral; provided that the Third Lien Representative and/or the Noteholder Collateral Agent may commence an enforcement action or otherwise exercise any or all such rights or remedies after (i) the passage of a period of at least 180 days has elapsed (which period will be tolled during any period in which any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent or any other Senior Claimholders is not entitled to enforce or exercise any rights or remedies with respect to any Collateral as a result of (x) any injunction issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or (y) the automatic stay or any other stay in any bankruptcy case; provided that in each case the Senior Representatives, any Senior Collateral Agents or any other Senior Claimholders are diligently pursuing relief from such injunction or stay) since the date the Senior Representatives received notice from the Third Lien Representative that such Third Lien Representative has declared the existence of any Event of Default under any Indenture Document and demanded the repayment of all the principal amount of any Note Obligations thereunder or (ii) the passage of a period of at least two business days has elapsed since the date the Senior Representatives received notice from the Third Lien Representative that such Third Lien Representative has declared the existence of any Judgment, Fine or Penalty Event (as defined in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement) and demanded the repayment of all the principal amount of any Note Obligations thereunder; (the periods described in the foregoing clauses (i) and (ii), the “Standstill Period”); provided, further, that notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event shall the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent or any Third Lien Claimholder take any enforcement action with respect to the Collateral (and shall discontinue any such enforcement action) if, notwithstanding the expiration of the Standstill Period, (1) any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent, or the applicable Senior Claimholders shall have commenced and be diligently pursuing an enforcement action or other exercise of their rights or remedies in each case with respect to all or any material portion of the Collateral (prompt notice of such exercise to be given to the Third Lien Representative) or (2) any Grantor shall be subject to any bankruptcy case (provided that in any such bankruptcy case the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent or any Third Lien Claimholder may take any action expressly permitted by the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement);

(2) will not contest, protest or object to any foreclosure proceeding or action brought by any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent or the applicable Senior Claimholders or any other exercise by any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent or the applicable Senior Claimholders of any rights and remedies relating to the Collateral under the Senior Loan Documents or other applicable law; and

113

(3) subject to their rights under clause (1) above, will not object to the forbearance by any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent, or the applicable Senior Claimholders from bringing or pursuing any foreclosure proceeding or action or any other exercise of any rights or remedies relating to the Collateral,

in each case so long as any proceeds received by any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent, or the applicable Senior Claimholders in excess of those necessary to achieve a discharge of Senior Obligations are distributed in accordance with the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement and applicable law.

Until the discharge of Senior Obligations has occurred, whether or not any bankruptcy case has been commenced by or against the Company or any Guarantor, subject to clause (1) of the preceding paragraph, the Designated Senior Representative, the Designated Senior Collateral Agent, or the applicable Senior Claimholders will have the exclusive right, subject to the terms of the Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement, to commence and maintain any enforcement action or otherwise enforce rights, exercise remedies (including set off, recoupment and the right to credit bid their debt, except that Third Lien Representatives shall have the rights set forth in the following paragraph), and subject to the terms of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, make determinations regarding the release, disposition, or restrictions with respect to the Collateral without any consultation with or the consent of the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent or any other Third Lien Claimholder; provided that any proceeds received by any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent, or the applicable Senior Claimholders, in excess of those necessary to achieve a discharge of Senior Obligations are distributed in accordance with the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement and applicable law. Subject to the terms of the Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement, in commencing or maintaining any enforcement action or otherwise exercising rights and remedies with respect to the Collateral, the Designated Senior Representative, the Designated Senior Collateral Agent or the Senior Claimholders may enforce the provisions of the Senior Loan Documents and exercise remedies thereunder, all in such order and in such manner as they may determine in the exercise of their sole discretion in compliance with any applicable law and without consultation with the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent or any other Third Lien Claimholder and regardless of whether any such exercise is adverse to the interest of any Third Lien Claimholder. Such exercise and enforcement shall include the rights of an agent appointed by them to sell or otherwise dispose of Collateral upon foreclosure, to incur expenses in connection with such sale or disposition, and to exercise all the rights and remedies of a secured creditor under the Uniform Commercial Code and of a secured creditor under Bankruptcy Laws of any applicable jurisdiction. Nothing contained in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement will be deemed to be a consent by (or waiver of any claim in respect of) any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent, or the applicable Senior Claimholders to any disposition of Collateral or any enforcement action by the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent or any other Third Lien Claimholder other than in a commercially reasonable manner.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent and any other Third Lien Claimholder may:

(1) file a claim or statement of interest with respect to the Note Obligations; provided that a bankruptcy case has been commenced by or against the Company or any Guarantor;

(2) take any action (not in contravention of the terms of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, not adverse to the priority status of the Liens on the Collateral, or the rights of any Senior Representative, any Senior Collateral Agent, or the Senior Claimholders to exercise remedies in respect thereof) in order to create, perfect, preserve or protect its Lien on the Collateral;

(3) file any necessary responsive or defensive pleadings in opposition to any motion, claim, adversary proceeding or other pleading made by any Person objecting to or otherwise seeking the disallowance of the claims of the Third Lien Claimholders, including any claims secured by the Collateral, if any;

(4) vote on any plan of reorganization, arrangement, compromise or liquidation, file any proof of claim, make other filings and make any arguments and motions that are, in each case, in accordance with the terms of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, with respect to the Note Obligations and the Collateral; provided that no filing of any claim or vote, or pleading related to such claim or vote, to accept or reject a disclosure statement, plan of reorganization, arrangement, compromise or liquidation, or any other document, agreement or proposal similar to the foregoing by the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent or any other Third Lien Claimholder, may be inconsistent with the provisions of the Third Lien

114

Intercreditor Agreement; provided further that each of the Third Lien Representative and Noteholder Collateral Agent, on behalf of itself and each of the Third Lien Claimholders represented by it, irrevocably agrees that, prior to the discharge of First Lien Obligations, it will vote to reject any plan of reorganization that is not approved by the at least two-thirds in amount and more than one-half in number of First Lien Claimholders. In furtherance of the foregoing, each of the First Lien Representative and First Lien Collateral Agent is in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement irrevocably constituted and appointed the attorney-in-fact of the Third Lien Claimholders to vote any claim arising from or relating to the Note Obligations in accordance with the foregoing;

(5) exercise any of its remedies or remedies after the termination of the Standstill Period to the extent permitted by the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement; and

(6) bid for or purchase Collateral at any public, private or judicial foreclosure upon such Collateral or any sale of Collateral during a bankruptcy case; provided that such bid may not include a “credit bid” in respect of any Note Obligations unless the cash proceeds of such bid are otherwise sufficient, and used, to cause the discharge of Senior Obligations on the closing of such credit bid transaction.

Purchase Right

The Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement provides that at any time following the earliest to occur of (i) an acceleration of any of the Senior Obligations in accordance with the terms of the applicable Senior Loan Documents, (ii) a Senior Payment Default that has not been cured or waived by the applicable Senior Claimholders within 60 days of the occurrence thereof, (iii) the commencement of any insolvency or liquidation proceeding with respect to the Company or any Guarantor, (iv) the occurrence and continuation of an Event of Default under the Indenture Documents, or (v) any request by any Senior Collateral Agent for the release of the Noteholder Collateral Agent’s Liens on the Collateral (other than in accordance with permitted dispositions at any time when no default or event of default exists under any Senior Loan Documents or the Indenture Documents) (each a “Purchase Event”), then the Third Lien Claimholders will have the option, but not the obligation, to elect to purchase all, but not less than all, of the Senior Obligations without warranty or representation or recourse except as provided below, and assume all, but not less than all, of the then existing funding commitments, if any, under the Senior Loan Documents by giving a written notice (the “Purchase Notice”) to each Senior Representative no later than the tenth business day after the Third Lien Claimholders receive notice of the occurrence of the Purchase Event. A Purchase Notice once delivered will be irrevocable. Such Purchase Notice may be delivered by less than all of the Third Lien Claimholders so long as all such Third Lien Claimholders will when taken together purchase such entire aggregate amount as set forth above.

The “Purchase Price” will equal the sum of (1) the full amount of all Senior Obligations then-outstanding and unpaid at par (including principal, accrued but unpaid interest and fees and any other unpaid amounts (in each case whether or not allowed or allowable in any insolvency proceeding), including breakage costs and, in the case of any secured hedging obligations, the amount that would be payable by the relevant Grantor thereunder if such Grantor were to terminate the hedge agreement in respect thereof on the date of the purchase or, if not terminated, an amount determined by the relevant Senior Claimholder to be necessary to collateralize its credit risk arising out of such agreement, but excluding any prepayment penalties or premiums), (2) the cash collateral to be furnished to the First Lien Claimholders providing letters of credit under the First Lien Loan Documents in such amount (not to exceed 105% thereof) as such First Lien Claimholders determine is reasonably necessary to secure such First Lien Claimholders in connection with any such outstanding and undrawn letters of credit and (3) all accrued and unpaid fees, expenses and other amounts (including attorneys’ fees and expenses) owed to the Senior Claimholders under or pursuant to the Senior Loan Documents on the date of purchase.

On the date specified by the Third Lien Claimholders in the Purchase Notice (which will not be less than five business days nor more than ten business days after the receipt by the Senior Representatives of the Purchase Notice), the Senior Claimholders will sell to the purchasing Third Lien Claimholders, and the purchasing Third Lien Claimholders will purchase from the Senior Claimholders, all, but not less than all, of the Senior Obligations, and the Senior Claimholders will assign to the purchasing Third Lien Claimholders, and the purchasing Third Lien Claimholders will assume from the Senior Claimholders all, but not less than all, of the then existing funding commitments under the Senior Loan Documents pursuant to documentation mutually acceptable to each of the Senior Representatives and the Third Lien Representative. Each Senior Claimholder will retain all rights to indemnification provided in the relevant Senior Loan Documents for all claims and other amounts relating to periods prior to the purchase of the Senior Obligations.

115

The purchase and sale of the Senior Obligations will be without recourse and without representation or warranty of any kind by the Senior Claimholders, except that the Senior Claimholders will severally and not jointly represent and warrant to the Third Lien Claimholders that on the date of such purchase, immediately before giving effect to the purchase:

(1) the principal of and accrued and unpaid interest on the Senior Obligations, and the fees and expenses thereof owed to the respective Senior Claimholders, are as stated in any assignment agreement prepared in connection with the purchase and sale of the Senior Obligations;

(2) each Senior Claimholder owns the Senior Obligations purported to be owned by it free and clear of any Liens (other than participation interests not prohibited by the Senior Loan Documents, in which case the Purchase Price will be appropriately adjusted so that the Third Lien Claimholders do not pay amounts represented by participation interests to the extent that the Third Lien Claimholders expressly assume the obligations under such participation interests); and

(3) such Senior Claimholder has the full right and power to assign its Senior Obligations and such assignment has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action by such Senior Claimholder.

Prohibition on Contesting Liens

Each of the Third Lien Representative and Noteholder Collateral Agent, for itself and on behalf of each other Third Lien Claimholder represented by it, agreed in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement that it will not (and waived any right to) directly or indirectly contest or support any other Person in contesting, in any proceeding (including any insolvency or liquidation proceeding), the priority, validity, perfection, extent or enforceability of a Lien held, or purported to be held, by or on behalf of any of the Senior Claimholders in the Collateral, or the amount, nature or extent of the Senior Obligations or the provisions of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement.

Waterfall

First, to the payment in full in cash of all First Lien Obligations not constituting Excess First Lien Obligations in such order as specified in the relevant First Lien Loan Documents and any First Lien Pari Passu Intercreditor Agreement then in effect until the discharge of Senior Obligations other than any Excess First Lien Obligations has occurred, provided, that any non-cash amounts may be held by the Designated Senior Collateral Agent as Collateral,

Second, to the payment in full in cash of all Second Lien Obligations in such order as specified in the relevant Second Lien Debt Documents and any Second Lien Pari Passu Intercreditor Agreement then in effect until the discharge of Second Lien Obligations has occurred,

Third, to the payment in full in cash of all First Lien Obligations constituting Excess First Lien Obligations in such order as specified in the relevant First Lien Loan Document and any First Lien Pari Passu Intercreditor Agreement then in effect, provided, that any non-cash amounts may be held by the Designated Senior Collateral Agent as Collateral,

Fourth, to the payment in full in cash of all Note Obligations in such order as specified in the relevant Indenture Document, and

Fifth, to the Grantors or as otherwise required by applicable law.

116

Payments Over

So long as the discharge of Senior Obligations has not occurred, whether or not any insolvency or liquidation proceeding has been commenced by or against the Company or any Guarantor, payments, distributions or other amounts received by or payable to, or for the benefit of, the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent or any other Third Lien Claimholder (other than Permitted Note Obligation Payments) in all cases will be segregated and held in trust and within five days after receipt be paid over to the Designated Senior Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Senior Claimholders, in the same form as received, with any necessary endorsements (which endorsements will be without recourse and without any representations or warranties) or as a court of competent jurisdiction may otherwise direct. The Designated Senior Collateral Agent is authorized under the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement to make any such endorsements as agent for the Third Lien Representative, the Noteholder Collateral Agent or any such other Third Lien Claimholder. Such authorization is coupled with an interest and is irrevocable until the discharge of Senior Obligations. The Noteholder Collateral Agent, for itself and on behalf of each other Third Lien Claimholder, agreed in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement that if, at any time, it obtains written notice that all or part of any payment with respect to any Senior Obligations previously made is rescinded for any reason whatsoever, it will within five days after receipt of such notice pay over to the Designated Senior Collateral Agent any payment received by it (other than Permitted Note Obligation Payments) and then in its possession or under its direct control in respect of any such Senior Collateral and will promptly turn any such Collateral then held by it over to the Designated Senior Collateral Agent, and the provisions set forth in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement will be reinstated as if such payment had not been made, until the discharge of Senior Obligations.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, other than certain exceptions set forth in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, Reorganization Securities received by or on behalf of any Third Lien Claimholder on account of the Note Obligations in any reorganization proceeding will not be subject to turnover to the Designated Senior Collateral Agent or any other Senior Claimholder.

DIP Financing; Section 363 Sales

Until the discharge of Senior Obligations has occurred, if the Company or any Guarantor becomes subject to any bankruptcy case and any Senior Representative desires to permit the use of “Cash Collateral” (as such term is defined in Section 363(a) of the Bankruptcy Code) on which such Senior Representative, such Senior Collateral Agent or any other creditor has a Lien, or to permit the Company or any Guarantor to obtain financing, whether from the Senior Claimholders or any other Person under Section 364 of the Bankruptcy Code or any similar Bankruptcy Law (“DIP Financing”), then the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement provides that the Third Lien Representative and the Noteholder Collateral Agent, for itself and on behalf of each other Third Lien Claimholder represented by it, will not object to such Cash Collateral use or DIP Financing (including any proposed orders for such Cash Collateral use and/or DIP Financing which are acceptable to any Senior Representative) and to the extent the Liens securing the Senior Obligations are subordinated to or pari passu with such DIP Financing and/or any “carve-out” agreed to by the Senior Representative, each Noteholder Collateral Agent will subordinate its Liens in the Collateral to the Liens securing such DIP Financing (and all obligations relating thereto) and/or any “carve-out” agreed to by the Senior Representative and each Third Lien Representative so long as:

(A) the Noteholder Collateral Agent retains a Lien on the Collateral (including proceeds thereof arising after the commencement of such proceeding) with the same relative priority with respect to the Liens of the Senior Collateral Agents as existed prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case but subject to any prior lien securing the DIP Financing permitted under the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement,

(B) the Noteholder Collateral Agent receives a replacement Lien on post-petition assets to the same extent granted to the Senior Claimholders or usage of cash collateral, with the same relative priority with respect to the Liens of the Senior Collateral Agents as existed prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case but subject to any prior lien securing the DIP Financing permitted under the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement,

(C) any such cash collateral use or DIP Financing does not compel any Grantor to seek confirmation of a specific plan of reorganization for which all or substantially all of the material terms are set forth in the cash collateral order or related documentation or DIP Financing order or related documentation; provided that the inclusion of milestones related to the plan process will not be deemed to compel the Company to seek a specific plan of reorganization,

117

(D) such cash collateral order or related documentation or DIP Financing order or related documentation does not require the liquidation of any material portion of the Collateral prior to a default under such order or related documentation or any sale of any substantial portion of the Collateral to any particular person (it being agreed that the inclusion of termination events or milestones with respect to a sale pursuant to 363 of the Bankruptcy Code acceptable to the lenders under such DIP Financing will not be deemed to constitute such a condition) and

(E) the Liens securing such DIP Financing are at least pari passu to the Liens securing the First Lien Obligations; and each Noteholder Collateral Agent, for itself and on behalf of each other Third Lien Claimholder represented by it, will not request adequate protection or any other relief in connection therewith (except as expressly agreed by the Designated Senior Representative or to the extent otherwise permitted by the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement).

No Third Lien Claimholder may provide DIP Financing to the Company or any Guarantor secured by Liens equal or senior in priority to the Liens securing any Senior Obligations. If no Senior Claimholder offers to provide DIP Financing to the extent permitted under the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement on or before the date of the hearing to approve DIP Financing, then a Third Lien Claimholder (or an Affiliate thereof) may seek to provide such DIP Financing secured by Liens junior to the Liens securing any Senior Obligations, and Senior Claimholders may object thereto; provided, further, that such DIP Financing may not “roll-up” or otherwise include or refinance any pre-petition Note Obligations. If one or more Senior Claimholders offer to provide DIP Financing to the extent permitted under the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement on or before the date of the hearing to approve DIP Financing, then no Third Lien Claimholder may seek to provide DIP Financing, regardless of the priority of the Liens securing same.

The Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement provides that each of the Third Lien Representative and the Noteholder Collateral Agent, for itself and on behalf of each other Third Lien Claimholder represented by it, agrees that it will not seek consultation rights in connection with, and it will not object to or oppose, a motion to sell, liquidate or otherwise dispose of Collateral under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code if the requisite Senior Claimholders have consented to such sale, liquidation or other disposition. The Third Lien Representative and the Noteholder Collateral Agent, for itself and on behalf of each other Third Lien Claimholder represented by it, further agreed that it will not directly or indirectly oppose or impede entry of any order in connection with such sale, liquidation or other disposition, including orders to retain professionals or set bid procedures in connection with such sale, liquidation or disposition, if the requisite Senior Claimholders have consented to (i) such retention of professionals and bid procedures in connection with such sale, liquidation or disposition of such assets or (ii) the sale, liquidation or disposition of such assets, in which event the Third Lien Claimholders will be deemed to have consented to the sale or disposition of Collateral pursuant to Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, so long as such order does not impair the rights of the Third Lien Claimholders under Section 363(k) of the Bankruptcy Code, subject to the terms of the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement; provided that the net cash proceeds of such sale or other disposition are permanently applied to pay the principal or face amount of the Senior Obligations.

Release of Liens

The Company and the Guarantors are entitled to releases of assets included in the Collateral from the Liens securing Note Obligations under any one or more of the following circumstances:

(1)

upon the full and final payment and performance of all Note Obligations of the Company and the Guarantors;

(2)

with respect to any asset constituting Collateral, if such Collateral is sold or otherwise disposed of in accordance with the terms of the covenant entitled “Asset Sales” and the Collateral Agreements and the Company has delivered to the Noteholder Collateral Agent an officers’ certificate certifying to such effect; provided that (a) any cash received from a disposition of Collateral will be required to be deposited in a deposit account controlled by the Company and held as Collateral subject to the Liens pending its application or use in compliance with the Asset Sales covenant and, from such deposit account, the

118

Company or any Restricted Subsidiary may withdraw funds to deploy the proceeds of an Asset Sale in compliance with the Asset Sales covenant; and (b) to the extent that any disposition in such Asset Sale was of Collateral, the non-cash consideration received is pledged as Collateral under the Collateral Agreements substantially simultaneously with such sale, in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Indenture and the Collateral Agreements;

(3)

upon legal or covenant defeasance or satisfaction and discharge of the Notes as provided below under the captions “—Legal Defeasance and Covenant Defeasance” and “—Satisfaction and Discharge”;

(4)

with respect to an applicable Subsidiary, upon the occurrence of a Contract Unwind Trigger;

(5)

with respect to any assignment of rights under the respective terminated Internal Charter only, upon the occurrence of an Internal Charter Unwind Trigger;

(6)

if any Guarantor is released from its Note Guarantee in accordance with the terms of the Indenture (including by virtue of such Guarantor ceasing to be a Restricted Subsidiary), that Guarantor’s assets will also be released from the Liens securing its Note Guarantee and the other Obligations;

(7)

as provided in the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement; or

(8)

pursuant to and to give effect to the exclusion described in the third paragraph under “—Collateral Agreements.”

In addition to the foregoing, the Company and the Guarantors will comply with the provisions of TIA Section 314. To the extent applicable, the Company and the Guarantors will comply with TIA Section 314(d), relating to the release of property or securities or relating to the substitution therefor of any property or securities to be subjected to the Lien of the security documents. Any certificate or opinion required by TIA Section 314(d) may be made by an officer of the Company except in cases where TIA Section 314(d) requires that such certificate or opinion be made by an independent Person, which Person will be an independent engineer, appraiser or other expert selected by the Company. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this paragraph, the Company will not be required to comply with all or any portion of TIA Section 314(d) if it determines, in good faith based on advice of counsel, that under the terms of TIA Section 314(d) and/or any interpretation or guidance as to the meaning thereof of the SEC, including “no action” letters or exemptive orders, all or any portion of TIA Section 314(d) is inapplicable to one or a series of released Collateral.

No Impairment of the Security Interests

Neither the Company nor any Guarantor is permitted to take any action, or omit to take any action, which action or omission might or would have the result of materially impairing the security interest with respect to the Collateral for the benefit of the Noteholder Collateral Agent, the Trustee and the holders of the Notes except as expressly set forth in, or permitted by, the Indenture Documents and the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement.

Neither the Company nor the Guarantors shall be permitted to take any action or otherwise attempt to enforce any claim (other than the Credit Agreement Obligations or Senior Secured Note Obligations or obligations arising under any other Credit Facility entered into in accordance with the terms of the Indenture) or maritime Lien (other than the Liens created by the Credit Agreement Collateral Agreements or the Senior Secured Collateral Agreements or other instruments giving rise to any such lien in accordance with the Indenture) against any Vessel that has priority over any claim or Lien of the Noteholder Collateral Agent, the Trustee and the holders of the Notes in respect of any Collateral, including any such claims or Liens arising under Ship Mortgages.

The Indenture provides that any release of Collateral in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture and the Collateral Agreements will not be deemed to impair the security under the Indenture in contravention of the provisions of the Indenture, and that any appraiser or other expert may rely on such provision in delivering a certificate requesting release.

119

Further Assurances

Neither the Company nor any Guarantor will enter into any agreement that requires the proceeds received from any sale of Collateral to be applied to repay, redeem, defease or otherwise acquire or retire any Indebtedness of any Person, other than as permitted or required by the Indenture and the Collateral Agreements.

To the extent that any agreement, instrument, Mortgage or other document is required to be delivered to give effect to and perfect the Liens, the Company and the Guarantors will be required to use their commercially reasonable efforts to deliver such instruments, Mortgages and/or other documents as soon as possible but in no event later than 20 business days following the Issue Date or, if an asset is acquired or delivered after the Issue Date, not later than 20 business days after such acquisition or delivery date; provided, however, that:

(1) the Company shall, and they shall cause any Guarantor to, at their sole cost and expense deliver to the Noteholder Collateral Agent:

(a) not more than five (5) months after the Issue Date, an opinion of Panamanian counsel to the effect that the Ship Mortgages covering the Panamanian flag vessels have been duly permanently registered in the Public Registry as appropriate in Panama, covering customary matters and substantially similar to the opinion delivered in connection with the Credit Agreement,

(b) not more than 45 days after the Issue Date, a third lien pledge agreement with respect to the shares of Vantage Driller ROCO S.R.L. and an opinion of Romanian counsel with respect thereto covering customary matters and substantially similar to the opinion delivered in connection with the Credit Agreement,

(c) not more than 45 days after the Issue Date, a third ranked quota pledge agreement with respect to the shares of Vantage Holding Hungary Kft., a third ranked floating charge agreement and an opinion of Hungarian counsel with respect thereto covering customary matters and substantially similar to the opinion delivered in connection with the Credit Agreement, and

(d) not more than 45 days after the Issue Date, a third lien share charge with respect to the shares of Vantage International Management Company Pte. Ltd. and an opinion of Singaporean counsel with respect thereto covering customary matters and substantially similar to the opinion delivered in connection with the Credit Agreement, and

(2) to the extent that any agreement, instrument, mortgage or other document referred to in the foregoing or otherwise to be delivered to give effect to and perfect liens in connection the Credit Agreement shall be permitted thereby to be delivered after the Issue Date, any corresponding agreement, instrument, Mortgage or other document required to be delivered to give effect to and perfect the Liens shall be permitted to be delivered after the Issue Date, but no later than substantially concurrently with the time required for delivery of such instrument, mortgage or other document under the Credit Agreement.

Upon the occurrence of a Contract Winning Trigger, the Company shall cause the applicable Subsidiary to pledge its assets and property pursuant to the Collateral Agreements to become part of the Collateral subject to the Liens and shall perfect such Liens as soon as practicable but not later than 20 business days or as soon as practicable where applicable local law requires additional time for compliance with applicable legal requirements; and such Liens shall be released upon the occurrence of a Contract Unwind Trigger, provided that no assets or property have been transferred or sold, directly or indirectly, by the Company or a Guarantor to such applicable Subsidiary that is subject to the “Asset Sales” covenant.

From and after the time the Credit Agreement, the Senior Secured Notes and any other Indebtedness that is secured by a Lien on the Collateral that is senior to the Lien securing the Notes, ceases to be outstanding, the Company will pledge, and will cause any of its relevant Subsidiaries to pledge, as soon as practicable, all of their Equity Interests in P.T. Vantage Drilling Company Indonesia as Collateral subject to the Liens for the benefit of the Noteholder Collateral Agent under the applicable Collateral Agreements, and will deliver such other instruments and execute such other documents as may be reasonably required to perfect such Liens.

120

The Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the approval of the Bank Negara Malaysia under the Malaysian Financial Services Act of 2013, as amended, of the complete guarantee of the Note Obligations by Vantage Drilling (Malaysia) I Sdn. Bhd. pursuant to Article 11 hereof; provided that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Indenture, until such approval has been obtained, Vantage Drilling (Malaysia) I Sdn. Bhd. shall not be treated as a Guarantor for purposes of clause (3) under the definition of “Permitted Liens” or the “Vessel Transfers” covenant, or as a Guarantor (a) to which another Guarantor may sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets or (b) with which or into which another Guarantor may consolidate or merge.

In furtherance of the foregoing, the Company shall, and shall cause any Guarantor to, at its sole cost and expense:

(i)

execute and deliver all such agreements and instruments and take all further action as reasonably necessary to more fully or accurately describe the property intended to be Collateral or the obligations intended to be secured by the Collateral Agreements; and

(ii)

file any such notice filings or other agreements or instruments as may be reasonably necessary under applicable law to perfect the Liens created by the Collateral Agreements.

Authorization of Actions to Be Taken

Each holder of Notes, by its acceptance thereof, is deemed to have consented and agreed to the terms of each Collateral Agreement, as originally in effect and as amended, supplemented or replaced from time to time in accordance with its terms or the terms of the Indenture, to have authorized and directed the Noteholder Collateral Agent to enter into the Collateral Agreements to which it is a party, and to have authorized and empowered the Noteholder Collateral Agent to bind the holders of the Notes as set forth in the Collateral Agreements to which it is a party and to perform its obligations and exercise its rights and powers thereunder, including entering into amendments permitted by the terms of the Indenture or the Collateral Agreements.

Certain Bankruptcy and Other Collateral Limitations

The ability of any Senior Collateral Agent, the Noteholder Collateral Agent, the Trustee and the holders of the Notes to realize upon the Collateral may be subject to certain bankruptcy law limitations in the event of a bankruptcy. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Investment in our Company’s Securities—Rights of holders of Notes in the collateral may be adversely affected by bankruptcy proceedings.” The ability of any Senior Collateral Agent, the Noteholder Collateral Agent, the Trustee and the holders of the Notes to foreclose on the Collateral may be subject to lack of perfection, the requirement of third party consents, local law, including those of foreign jurisdictions, prior Liens and practical problems such as lack of jurisdiction over a Vessel due to its physical location, associated with the realization of the Noteholder Collateral Agent’s Lien on the Collateral. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Company’s Business—Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, stakeholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests, and their ability to protect their rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited.”

Additionally, any Senior Collateral Agent or the Noteholder Collateral Agent may need to evaluate the impact of the potential liabilities before determining to foreclose on the Vessels, on any assignment of Equity Interests or on any Collateral consisting of any real property because a secured creditor that holds a Lien on any thereof may be held liable under environmental laws for the costs of remediating or preventing releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances from vessels or at such real property or become liable for other obligations of the Company or relevant Guarantor such as maritime liens. Consequently, a Senior Collateral Agent or the Noteholder Collateral Agent may decline to foreclose on such Collateral or exercise remedies available if it does not receive indemnification to its satisfaction from the holders of the Notes.

•

Subject to the restrictions on incurring Indebtedness and granting Liens in respect thereof in the Indenture or the Senior Loan Documents, the Company, the Guarantors and the Restricted Subsidiaries will also have the right, among other things, to incur Indebtedness, including, without limitation, Capital Lease Obligations and mortgage and purchase money obligations and acquire assets with the proceeds of such Indebtedness, which assets could be subject to Liens that secures such Indebtedness. To the extent third parties’ hold Liens (whether or not such Liens are Permitted Liens), such third

121

parties may have rights and remedies with respect to the assets subject to such Liens that, if exercised, could adversely affect the value of the Collateral or the Noteholder Collateral Agent’s remedies. By its nature, some or all of the Collateral will be illiquid and may have no readily ascertainable market value and any sale of such Collateral separately from the assets of the Company and the Guarantors as a whole may not be feasible. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Collateral can be sold in a short period of time, if at all. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Investment in our Company’s Securities—There may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any portion of the Notes.” The enforceability of any of the arrangements set forth in any intercreditor agreement may be subject to the application of insolvency laws outside the United States. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Investment in our Company’s Securities—Foreclosing on the collateral may be difficult.”

Withholding Taxes

All payments made on behalf of the Company or any Guarantor under or with respect to the Notes or the Note Guarantees must be made free and clear of and without withholding or deduction for, or on account of, any present or future tax, duty, levy, impost, assessment or other governmental charge (including penalties, interest and other liabilities related thereto) imposed or levied by or on behalf of any Specified Tax Jurisdiction or by any authority or agency therein or thereof having power to tax (or the jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of any successor of the Company or any Guarantor) (hereinafter “Taxes”), unless the Company or the applicable Guarantor, as applicable, are so required to withhold or deduct Taxes by law or by the interpretation or administration thereof by the relevant government authority or agency. If the Company or any Guarantor (or any successor of any of them), as applicable, are so required to withhold or deduct any amount for or on account of Taxes from any payment made under or with respect to the Notes or the Note Guarantee, the Company or such Guarantor (or any successor of any of them), as applicable, will be required to pay such additional amounts (“Additional Amounts”) as may be necessary so that the net amount received by each holder (including Additional Amounts) after such withholding or deduction will not be less than the amount the holder would have received if such Taxes had not been withheld or deducted; provided, however, that no Additional Amounts will be payable with respect to payments treated as a dividend under the tax laws of the relevant Specified Tax Jurisdiction or payments made to a holder (such holder in such capacity, an “Excluded Holder”) in respect of a Beneficial Owner (i) which is subject to such Taxes by reason of its being connected with any Specified Tax Jurisdiction, including such Holder or Beneficial Owner being or having been a citizen or resident thereof or being or having been engaged in a trade or business or present therein or having, or having had, a permanent establishment therein, otherwise than by the mere holding of Notes, the enforcement of rights under the Indenture or the receipt of payments thereunder (or under the related Note Guarantee), (ii) which presents any Note for payment of principal more than 30 days after the later of (x) the date on which payment first became due and (y) if the full amount payable has not been received by the Trustee on or prior to such due date, the date on which, the full amount payable having been so received, notice to that effect shall have been given to the holders by the Trustee, except to the extent that the holder would have been entitled to such Additional Amounts on presenting such Note for payment on the last day of the applicable 30-day period, (iii) which failed duly and timely to comply with a reasonable, timely request of the Company to provide, to the extent it is legally entitled to do so, information, documents or other evidence concerning the holder’s nationality, residence, entitlement to treaty benefits, identity or connection with any Specified Tax Jurisdiction, if and to the extent that due and timely compliance with such request would have reduced or eliminated any Taxes as to which Additional Amounts would have otherwise been payable to such holder but for this clause (iii), (iv) except as specifically provided in this section, on account of any estate, inheritance, gift, sale, transfer, personal property or other similar Tax, (v) which is a fiduciary, a partnership or not the Beneficial Owner of any payment on a Note, if and to the extent that any beneficiary or settlor of such fiduciary, any partner in such partnership or the Beneficial Owner of such payment (as the case may be) would not have been entitled to receive Additional Amounts with respect to such payment if such beneficiary, settlor, partner or Beneficial Owner had been the holder of such Note, (vi) on account of Taxes imposed on a payment to an individual or to the benefit of an individual and required to be made pursuant to the European Council Directive 2003/48/EC, European Council Directive 2014/48/EU or any other directive implementing the conclusions of the ECOFIN Council meeting of November 26 and 27, 2000 on the taxation of savings income, or any law implementing or complying with, or introduced in order to conform to, those directives, (vii) to the extent the Additional Amount relates to any Taxes imposed on a Note presented for payment by or on behalf of a holder who would have been able to avoid that withholding or deduction by presenting the relevant Note to another paying agent in a member state of the European Union, (viii) on account of or pursuant to an agreement described in Section 1471(b) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “U.S. Tax Code”), or

122

otherwise pursuant to Section 1471 through 1474 of the U.S. Tax Code, any current or future regulations or agreements thereunder, official interpretations thereof, or any laws, rules or practices implementing an intergovernmental approach thereto, or (ix) any combination of the foregoing numbered clauses of this proviso. The Company or any applicable Guarantor (or any successor of any of them), as applicable, will also make such withholding or deduction and remit the full amount deducted or withheld to the relevant authority as and when required in accordance with applicable law. The Company or any applicable Guarantor (or any successor of any of them), as applicable, will furnish to the Trustee, within 30 days after the date the payment of any Taxes is due pursuant to applicable law, copies of tax receipts evidencing such payment by the Company or such Guarantor (or any successor of any of them), as applicable, (i) in such form as provided in the normal course by the taxing authority imposing such Taxes and as is reasonably available to the Company or such Guarantor (or any successor of any of them), as applicable, and (ii) certified by such taxing authority (or, if no such certification is available from such taxing authority, then by means of an officers’ certificate from the Company or such Guarantor (or any successor of any of them), as applicable). The Trustee shall thereafter make such evidence available to the holders upon written request. The Company or any Guarantor (or any successor of any of them), as applicable, will upon written request of each holder (other than a holder that is an Excluded Holder with respect to a given payment due hereunder), reimburse each such holder for the amount of (i) any Taxes so levied or imposed and paid by such holder as a result of payments made under or with respect to the Notes, the Note Guarantee, a Mortgage or other Security Agreement, as applicable, and (ii) any Taxes imposed with respect to any such reimbursement under the immediately preceding clause (i), but excluding any Taxes on such holder’s net income, so that the net amount received by such holder after such reimbursement will not be less than the net amount the holder would have received if Taxes (other than such Taxes on such holder’s net income) on such reimbursement had not been imposed.

Whenever in the Indenture there is mentioned, in any context, (a) the payment of principal, (b) purchase or redemption prices in connection with a purchase or redemption of Notes, (c) interest or (d) any other amount payable on or with respect to any of the Notes, or any payment pursuant to the Note Guarantee, such mention shall be deemed to include mention of the payment of Additional Amounts provided for in this section to the extent that, in such context, Additional Amounts are, were or would be payable in respect thereof.

The foregoing obligations shall survive any defeasance or discharge of the Indenture.

The Company or the Guarantors will pay any present or future stamp, court or documentary taxes or any other excise or property taxes, charges or similar levies that are imposed by any Specified Tax Jurisdiction from the execution, delivery, enforcement or registration of the Notes, the Note Guarantee or a Mortgage or other Collateral Agreement or any other document or instrument in relation thereto, or the receipt of any payments with respect to the Notes, the Note Guarantee, a Mortgage or other Security Agreement.

Redemption and Offer to Purchase

Optional Redemption

At any time prior to the maturity date of the Notes, the Company may, at its option, redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at one time or from time to time, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Notes redeemed plus the Applicable Premium as of, and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, the applicable Redemption Date, subject to the rights of holders of Notes on the relevant Record Date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date in respect of then outstanding Notes.

Unless the Company defaults in the payment of the redemption price, interest will cease to accrue on the Notes or portions thereof called for redemption on the applicable Redemption Date.

Optional Redemption for Changes in Withholding Taxes

Subject to the terms of, and the relative priorities and related rights set forth in, the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, at any time, the Company may redeem all, but not less than all, of the Notes, on not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest and any Additional Amounts to the extent any Additional Amounts are due and owing to the

123

applicable Redemption Date (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date), in the event that the Company or the Guarantors, as the case may be, has become or would become obligated to pay, on the next date on which any amount would be payable with respect to the Notes, any Additional Amounts as a result of a change in or an amendment to the laws (including any regulations or rulings promulgated thereunder) of any Specified Tax Jurisdiction (or any relevant jurisdiction, political subdivision or taxing authority thereof or therein), or any change in or amendment to any official position regarding the application or interpretation of such laws, regulations or rulings (including a holding by a court of competent jurisdiction), which change or amendment is announced or becomes effective on or after the date of the Indenture, and the Company or the Guarantors, as the case may be, cannot avoid such obligation by taking reasonable measures available to them; provided that, (1) the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith that the aggregate amount of such Additional Amounts would create additional annual costs in excess of 0.50% of the aggregate principal amount of Notes then outstanding; and (2) (a) no such notice of redemption shall be given earlier than 90 days prior to the earliest date on which the Company or the Guarantors, as the case may be, would be obligated to pay such Additional Amounts if a payment in respect of the Notes or the Note Guarantee were then due, and (b) at the time any such redemption notice is given, such obligation to pay Additional Amounts must remain in effect. Prior to any redemption of the Notes, the Company will be required to deliver to the Trustee (i) an officers’ certificate stating that (x) the Company or the Guarantors, as the case may be, cannot avoid obligations to pay Additional Amounts by taking reasonable measures available to them and (y) the Company is otherwise entitled to effect such redemption and attaching the resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Company as to additional annual costs described above and (ii) an opinion of independent legal counsel of recognized standing stating that the Company would be obligated to pay Additional Amounts as a result of a change in tax laws or regulations and, in the case of (i) and (ii), stating that the conditions precedent to the right of redemption have occurred. No such notice of redemption may be given more than 60 days before or more than 270 days after the Company or any Guarantors, as the case may be, first becomes liable or aware of the liability to pay any Additional Amounts as a result of a change or amendment described above.

Mandatory Redemption Upon Event of Loss of a Vessel

Subject to the terms of, and the relative priorities and related rights set forth in, the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, upon the occurrence or happening of any Event of Loss, the Company shall be required to redeem Notes and such other pari passu Indebtedness containing provisions similar to those set forth in the Indenture with respect to a redemption upon Event of Loss, in an amount equal to the maximum principal amount of Notes (subject to the last paragraph under the caption “—Selection and Notice”) and such other pari passu Indebtedness that may be purchased out of the Event of Loss Proceeds received in respect of such loss upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ notice to the Trustee, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes redeemed to the applicable Redemption Date. The Company shall deliver the redemption notice to the holders of the Notes within 30 days of the receipt of any Event of Loss Proceeds. If the aggregate principal amount of Notes and other pari passu Indebtedness exceeds the amount of Event of Loss Proceeds, the Noteholder Collateral Agent shall select Notes and such other pari passu Indebtedness to be redeemed on a pro rata basis (or as near to a pro rata basis as permitted by the Applicable Procedures) by lot to the extent practicable or by such other method in accordance with the Applicable Procedures of the Depositary. All Event of Loss Proceeds received in respect of an Event of Loss will be required to be deposited in a deposit account controlled by the Noteholder Collateral Agent and held as Collateral subject to a Lien under the Collateral Agreements pending their application to redemption of Notes and such other pari passu Indebtedness and, from such deposit account, the Noteholder Collateral Agent may withdraw funds to deploy the Event of Loss Proceeds in compliance with the foregoing.

Change of Control

Subject to the terms of, and the relative priorities and related rights set forth in, the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement, if a Change of Control occurs, each holder of Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or any part of that holder’s Notes pursuant to a change of control offer (a “Change of Control Offer”) on the terms set forth in the Indenture. In the Change of Control Offer, the Company will offer a payment (the “Change of Control Payment”) in cash equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes repurchased to the date of purchase, subject to the rights of holders of Notes on the relevant record date to receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date. Within ten business

124

days following any Change of Control, the Company will send a notice to the Trustee and each holder describing the transaction or transactions that constitute the Change of Control and, subject to the next sentence, offering to repurchase Notes on the Change of Control Payment Date specified in the notice, which date will be no earlier than 30 days and no later than 60 days from the date such notice is sent (the “Change of Control Payment Date”), pursuant to the procedures required by the Indenture and described in such notice. Each holder will only have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or any part of that holder’s Notes pursuant to the Change of Control Offer in a minimum amount equal to the Current Principal Amount of Notes per Unit on such Redemption Date represented by a single Stapled Security, and, to the extent such holder holds more than a single Stapled Security, integral multiples of such amount, and any new Notes issued to holders whose Notes are purchased in part will be issued in multiples of such amount. The Company will comply with the requirements of Rule 14e-l under the Exchange Act and any other securities laws and regulations thereunder to the extent those laws and regulations are applicable in connection with the repurchase of the Notes as a result of a Change of Control. To the extent that the provisions of any securities laws or regulations conflict with the Change of Control provisions of the Indenture, the Company will comply with the applicable securities laws and regulations and will not be deemed to have breached its obligations under the Change of Control provisions of the Indenture by virtue of such compliance.

On or before the Change of Control Payment Date, the Company will, to the extent lawful:

(1)

accept for payment all Notes or portions of Notes properly tendered pursuant to the Change of Control Offer;

(2)

deposit with the paying agent an amount equal to the Change of Control Payment in respect of all Notes or portions of Notes properly tendered; and

(3)

deliver or cause to be delivered to the Trustee the Notes properly accepted together with an officers’ certificate stating the aggregate principal amount of Notes or portions of Notes being purchased by the Company.

The paying agent will promptly send to each holder of Notes properly tendered the Change of Control Payment for such Notes, and the Trustee will promptly authenticate and mail (or cause to be transferred by book entry) to each holder a Note equal in principal amount to any unpurchased portion of the Notes surrendered, if any; provided that each such Note will be in a principal amount of $1.00 or in integral multiples of $0.01 in excess thereof. The Company will publicly announce the results of the Change of Control Offer on or as soon as practicable after the Change of Control Payment Date.

The provisions described above that require the Company to make a Change of Control Offer following a Change of Control are applicable whether or not any other provisions of the Indenture are applicable.

Except as described above with respect to a Change of Control, the Indenture does not contain provisions that permit the holders of the Notes to require that the Company repurchase or redeem the Notes in the event of a takeover, recapitalization or similar transaction.

The Company will not be required to make a Change of Control Offer upon a Change of Control if (1) a third party makes the Change of Control Offer in the manner, at the times and otherwise in compliance with the requirements set forth in the Indenture applicable to a Change of Control Offer made by the Company and purchases all Notes properly tendered and not withdrawn under the Change of Control Offer, or (2) notice of redemption has previously been given pursuant to the Indenture as described above under the caption “—Redemption and Offer to Purchase,” unless and until there is a default in payment of the applicable redemption price.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Vantage Drilling Africa S-1/A