UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014

Commission file number: 000-52905

INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada

26-0091556

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

4116 Antique Sterling Ct.

Las Vegas, NV 89129

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (702) 255-4170

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o ☐ No x☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. ~~Yes~~ oYes ☐ No x☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o ☐ No x☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☐ o No T☒

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o☐ Accelerated filer o☐ Non-accelerated filer o☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company x☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x ☒ No o☐

For the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014, the issuer had no revenues.

As of January 1131, ~~2013~~2015, there was no trading market for the issuer’s common stock, $.001 par value.

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, $.001 par value, as of January 1131, ~~2013~~2015 was 2,500,000 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

NONE.

International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.

Form 10-K Annual Report

Table of Contents

PART I		PAGE
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3
Item 2.	Properties	7
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	7
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	7
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	7
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data (not applicable to smaller reporting companies)
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	8
Item 8.	Financial Statements	10
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	2011
Item 9A(T)	Controls and Procedures	2011
Item 9B.	Other Information	2011
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	2112
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	2213
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	2213
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	2314
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	2415
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	2516
SIGNATURES		2617
EXHIBIT INDEX		2718
CERTIFICATIONS

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT INFORMATION

Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements” regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein particularly in view of the current state of our operations, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a statement by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth herein under the headings “Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors”. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. The terms “we”, “our”, “us”, or any derivative thereof, as used herein refer to International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.

PART 1

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

CORPORATE BACKGROUND

International Industrial Enterprises, Inc. (sometimes the “Company”) was incorporated on November 19, 1976 under the laws of the State of Delaware to engage in any lawful corporate activity.

We were engaged in real estate investments from formation until April 1982 and we were dormant until July 29, 1994. As at July 31, 1994, we were deemed to be a developmental stage company and all funds raised in order to fulfill our initial objective had been expanded. Thereafter, we had very limited operations until June 14, 2004 when we purchased Karlton Management, Inc., whose name was changed to Group One Associates Inc., a Nevada Corporation.

In 2004, we were engaged in the designing and printing tourist maps for various Las Vegas destinations. Our business stalled for eight months due to the death of our President in October 2006. On June 18, 2007, a new President was elected and we restarted our business. While we did not own any printing equipment, we intended to job-out our printing needs (maps) to established printing companies. Our tourist maps were to be printed on quality paper stock and our map designs were to be comical as well as informational. We intended to hire experienced advertising salesmen to sell advertising space on our maps. There is vigorous competition in the publishing and distribution of maps of Las Vegas. Some of these maps are sold and some are free. We intended to compete by offering a free Las Vegas map with advertisers, which feature main thoroughfares (no secondary roads) and the location of Hotels, Casinos, Restaurants and tourist locations.

We currently have conducted no business that has resulted in any ~~income~~revenue to the company.

CURRENT STATUS

As of the date hereof, we may be deemed to be and can be defined as a “shell” company and those disclosures had been made in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings. We were not a blind pool issuer.

Also, as of the date hereof and as disclosed to the Securities and Exchange Commission, based upon our proposed future business activities, we may in the future be deemed a “blank check” company. The Securities and Exchange Commission definition of such a company is a development stage company that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person and is issuing a “penny stock” security.

A “penny stock” security is generally an equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the Nasdaq system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange system). The penny stock rules require a broker or dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker or dealer also must provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker or dealer, and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The penny stock rules also require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from such rule; the broker or dealer must make a special written determination that a penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has recognized the use of a shell company to effectuate a reverse merger transaction and the use to achieve a “back door” registration and adopted new rules and rule amendments relating to our filings as a reporting shell company in July 2005.

On June 29, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules amending the Form S-8 and the Form 8-K for shell companies like us. These rules were published in the Federal Register on July 21, 2005 and are effective as of August 22, 2005, except for an amendment to Item 5.06 of the Form 8-K that became effective on November 5, 2005. The amendments expand the definition of a shell company to be a company with no or nominal operations, assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents, or assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets. The rules and rule amendments prohibit the use of a Form S-8 (a form used by a corporation to register securities issued to an employee, director, officer, consultant or advisor, under certain circumstances), and revise the Form 8-K to require a shell company to include current Form 10 or Form 10-SB information, including audited financial statements, in the filing on Form 8-K that the shell company files to report an event that causes it to cease being a shell company. The shell company will be required to file financial statements within four days about the transaction. Where an operating company acquires a shell company and the operating company survives the transaction, the operating company will have acquired control of the shell for purposes of the definition of “succession” under the final rules and the operating company, as the surviving entity, will be required to file a Form 8-K under Item 5.01. The rules are designed to assure that investors in shell companies that acquire operations or assets have access on a timely basis to the same kind of information as is available to investors in public companies with continuing operations.

We are currently not engaged in any preliminary negotiations to effectuate a business combination. The majority shareholder has had no preliminary negotiations that, if consummated, may result in a change in control.

We have been informed that, if, pursuant to any arrangement or understanding with the person or persons acquiring securities in a transaction subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, any persons are to be elected or designated as directors of the Company, otherwise than at a meeting of security holders, and the persons so elected or designated will constitute a majority of the directors of the Company, then, not less than 10 days prior to the date any such persons take office as a director, or such shorter period prior to the date the Securities and Exchange Commission may authorize upon a showing of good cause therefore, the Company shall file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and transmit to all holders of record of securities of the Company who would be entitled to vote at a meeting for election of directors, information substantially equivalent to certain information which would be required by Schedule 14A of Regulation 14A to be transmitted if such person or persons were nominees for election as directors at a meeting of such security holders.

We have been informed that most business combinations to which we may be a party will be accounted for pursuant to ASC 805-40, Business Combinations: Reverse Acquisitions with us being the surviving registrant. As a result of any business combination, if the acquired entity's shareholders will exercise control over us, the transaction will be deemed to be a capital transaction where we are treated as a non-business entity. Therefore, the accounting for the business combination is identical to that resulting from a reverse merger, except no goodwill or other intangible assets will be recorded. For accounting purposes, the acquired entity will be treated as the accounting acquirer and, accordingly, will be presented as the continuing entity.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to numerous risk factors, including the following:

We have had no operating history nor any revenues or earnings from operations and we are insolvent.

We have no assets or financial resources. We will, in all likelihood, sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until the consummation of a business combination. This may result in us incurring a net operating loss that will increase continuously until we can consummate a business combination with a profitable business opportunity. There is no assurance that we can identify such a business opportunity and consummate such a business combination.

Our auditor's going concern opinion and the notation in the financial statements indicate that we do not have significant cash or other material assets and that we are relying on advances from stockholders, officers and directors to meet our limited operating expenses. We are insolvent in that we are unable to pay our debts in the ordinary course of business as they become due.

Our proposed plan of operation is speculative.

The success of our proposed plan of operation will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the identified business opportunity. While management intends to seek business combination(s) with entities having established operating histories, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in locating candidates meeting such criteria. In the event we complete a business combination, of which there can be no assurance, the success of our operations may be dependent upon management of the successor firm or venture partner firm and numerous other factors beyond our control.

We face intense competition for business opportunities and combinations.

We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with, joint ventures with and acquisitions of small private and public entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including venture capital and hedge fund firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be our desirable target candidates. Nearly all such entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we have and, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. Moreover, we will also compete in seeking merger or acquisition candidates with numerous other small public companies.

We have no agreements for a business combination or other transaction and have established no standards for a business combination.

We have no arrangement, agreement or understanding with respect to engaging in a merger with, joint venture with or acquisition of, a private or public entity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying and evaluating suitable business opportunities or in concluding a business combination. Management has not identified any particular industry or specific business within an industry for our evaluation. There is no assurance that we will be able to negotiate a business combination on terms favorable to us. We have not established a specific length of operating history or a specified level of earnings, assets, net worth or other criteria which it will require a target business opportunity to have achieved, and without which we would not consider a business combination in any form with such business opportunity. Accordingly, we may enter into a business combination with a business opportunity having no significant operating history, losses, limited or no potential for earnings, limited assets, negative net worth or other negative characteristics.

Our success is dependent on management that has other full time employment, has limited experience and will only devote limited time working for the Company making our future even more uncertain.

We have not entered into a written employment agreement with our officers and directors and none is expected in the foreseeable future. We have not obtained key man life insurance of our officers or directors. Notwithstanding the combined limited experience and time commitment of management, the loss of the services of Glen W. ~~Rogers~~Rodgers and Jose F. ~~Fernando~~Garcia, or either, would adversely affect development of our business and our likelihood of continuing operations.

The reporting requirements under federal securities law may delay or prevent us from making certain acquisitions.

Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "1934 Act"), require companies subject thereto to provide certain information about significant acquisitions, including certified financial statements for the company acquired, covering one, two, or three years, depending on the relative size of the acquisition. The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare such statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable acquisition by the Company. Acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to obtain the required audited statements may not be appropriate for acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the 1934 Act are applicable.

In addition to the audited financial statements, in the filing of the Form 8-K that we file to report an event that causes us to cease being a shell company, we will be required to include that information that is normally reported by a company in a Form 10. The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare and disclose such information may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an otherwise desirable acquisition by the Company.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 creates a situation wherein we would be required to register and could be required to incur substantial additional costs and expenses.

Although we will be subject to regulation under the 1934 Act, management believes the Company will not be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, insofar as we will not be engaged in the business of investing or trading in securities. In the event we engage in business combination that result in us holding passive investment interests in a number of entities, we could be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940. In such event, we would be required to register as an investment company and could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs. We have obtained no formal determination from the Securities and Exchange Commission as to the status of our Company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and, consequently, any violation of such Act would subject us to material adverse consequences.

Our present management most likely will not remain after we complete a business combination.

A business combination involving the issuance of our Common Stock will, in all likelihood, result in the shareholders of a private company obtaining a controlling interest in us. Any such business combination may require our management to sell or transfer all or a portion of the Company's Common Stock held and/or resign as a member of the Board of Directors. The resulting change in our control could result in removal of one or more present officers and directors and a corresponding reduction in or elimination of any participation in our future affairs.

At the time we do any business combination, each shareholder will most likely hold a substantially lesser percentage ownership in the Company.

Our current primary plan of operation is based upon a business combination with a private concern that, in all likelihood, would result in the Company issuing securities to shareholders of any such private company. The issuance of our previously authorized and unissued Common Stock would result in reduction in percentage of shares owned by our present and prospective shareholders and may result in a change in our control or in our management.

As a shell company, we face substantial additional adverse business and legal consequences.

We may enter into a business combination with an entity that desires to establish a public trading market for its shares. A business opportunity may attempt to avoid what it deems to be adverse consequences of undertaking its own public offering by seeking a business combination with us. Such consequences may include, but are not limited to, time delays of the registration process, significant expenses to be incurred in such an offering, loss of voting control to public shareholders and the inability or unwillingness to comply with various federal and state laws enacted for the protection of investors.

On June 29, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted final rules amending the Form S-8 and the Form 8-K for shell companies like us. The amendments expand the definition of a shell company to be broader than a company with no or nominal operations/assets or assets consisting of cash and cash equivalents, the amendments prohibit the use of a From S-8 (a form used by a corporation to register securities issued to an employee, directors, officer, consultant or advisor), under certain circumstances, and revise the Form 8-K to require a shell company to include current Form 10 information, including audited financial statements, in the filing on Form 8-K that the shell company files to report the acquisition of the business opportunity. This initial filing is within four days of the acquisition. The Form 8-K filing may be reviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the prospects of certain disclosures or review or the lack of the ability to issue securities using a Form S-8 may delay the consummation of a business combination because of the target entities inability to comply with various federal and state laws enacted for the protection of investors or the unwillingness to assume the significant costs of compliance.

The requirement of audited financial statements may disqualify business opportunities.

Our management believes that any potential business opportunity must provide audited financial statements for review, for the protection of all parties to the business combination. One or more attractive business opportunities may choose to forego the possibility of a business combination with us, rather than incur the expenses associated with preparing audited financial statements.

There is no active trading market for our Common Stock and you may have no ability to sell the shares.

There is no established public trading market for our shares of Common Stock. There can be no assurance that a market for our Common Stock will be established or that, if established, a market will be sustained. Therefore, if you purchase our Common Stock you may be unable to sell them. Accordingly, you should be able to bear the financial risk of losing your entire investment.

The OTC Bulletin Board is a market maker or dealer-driven system offering quotation and trading reporting capabilities - a regulated quotation service - that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices, and volume information in OTC equity securities. The OTC Bulletin Board securities are not listed and traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchanges. Instead, OTC Bulletin Board securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting market makers or dealers in stocks.

Our shareholders may face significant restrictions on the resale of our Common Stock due to state "blue sky" laws or if we are determined to be a "blank check" company.

If our Common Stock does not meet blue sky resale requirements, certain shareholders may be unable to resell our Common Stock. The resale of Common Stock must meet the blue sky resale requirements in the states in which the proposed purchasers reside. If we are unable to qualify the Common Stock and there is no exemption from qualification in certain states, the holders of the Common Stock or the purchasers of the Common Stock may be unable to sell them.

There are state regulations that may adversely affect the transferability of our Common Stock. We have not registered our Common Stock for resale under the securities or "blue sky" laws of any state. We may seek qualification or advise our shareholders of the availability of an exemption We are under no obligation to register or qualify our Common Stock in any state or to advise the shareholders of any exemptions.

Current shareholders, and person who desire to purchase the Common Stock in any trading market that may develop in the future, should be aware that there might be significant state restrictions upon the ability of new investors to purchase the Common Stock.

Blue sky laws, regulations, orders, or interpretations place limitations on offerings or sales of securities by "blank check" companies or in "blind-pool" offerings, or if such securities represent "cheap stock" previously issued to promoters or others. Our initial shareholders, because they originally paid $.10 for each share, may be deemed to hold "cheap stock." These limitations typically provide, in the form of one or more of the following limitations, that such securities are:

(a) Not eligible for sale under exemption provisions permitting sales without registration to accredited investors or qualified purchasers;

(b) Not eligible for the transaction exemption from registration for non-issuer transactions by a registered broker-dealer;

(c) Not eligible for registration under the simplified small corporate offering registration (SCOR) form available in many states;

(d) Not eligible for the "solicitations of interest" exception to securities registration requirements available in many states;

(e) Not permitted to be registered or exempted from registration, and thus not permitted to be sold in the state under any circumstances.

Virtually all 50 states have adopted one or more of these limitations, or other limitations or restrictions affecting the sale or resale of stock of blank check companies or securities sold in "blind pool" offerings or "cheap stock" issued to promoters or others.

Any secondary trading market which may develop, may only be conducted in those jurisdictions where an applicable exemption is available or where the shares have been registered.

We do not have any legal opinions as it relates to whether were a blind pool or blank-check company. The Securities and Exchange Commission have adopted a rule (Rule 419) which defines a blank-check company as (i) a development stage company, that is (ii) offering penny stock, as defined by Rule 3a51-1, and (iii) that has no specific business plan or purpose or has indicated that its business plan is engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies. Certain jurisdictions may have definitions that are more restrictive than Rule 419. We have been informed that the Securities and Exchange Commission has cautioned that "it will scrutinize registered offerings for attempts to create the appearance that the registrant... has a specific business plan, in an effort to avoid the applicable of Rule 419." Provisions of Rule 419 apply to every registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to an offering by a blank-check company. We have never filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The provisions of Rule 144 for shares subsequently issued by a shell company may further restrict the sale of newly issued shares of Common Stock.

The Company's officers, directors and majority shareholders have expressed their intention not to engage in any transactions with respect to the Company's Common Stock except in connection with or following a business combination resulting in us no longer being defined as a blank check issuer.

Our Common Stock may be subject to significant restriction on resale due to federal penny stock restrictions.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules that regulate broker or dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange system). The penny stock rules require a broker or dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker or dealer also must provide the customer with bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker or dealer, and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The penny stock rules also require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from such rules, the broker or dealer must make a special written determination that a penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market for our stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules, and accordingly, shareholders of our Common Stock may find it difficult to sell their securities, if at all.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

We have no unresolved comments from the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company does not own any property at the present time and has no agreements to acquire any property. Our executive offices are located at 4116 Antique Sterling Ct., Las Vegas, Nevada 89129. (The space is approximately 150 square feet total) and is provided by a shareholder at no cost. We believe that this space is adequate for our needs at this time, and we believe that we will be able to locate additional space in the future, if needed, on commercially reasonable terms.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not party to nor are we aware of any material pending lawsuit, litigation or proceeding.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR OUR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

(a) Market Information. Our Common Stock is not trading on any public trading market or stock exchange. No assurance can be given that any market for our Common Stock will ever develop.

(b) Holders. As of January 1131, ~~2013~~2015, there were 41 record holders of all of our issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock.

(c) Dividend Policy. We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividend in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends, if any, is within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial condition and such other factors as the Board of Directors may consider.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of International Industrial Enterprises, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements included in this Form 10-K.

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Overview

We are a shell company with no operations. Our statement of operations contains costs primarily associated with the administration of our public company entity.

Plan of operation for the next twelve months

We intend to seek, investigate, and, if warranted, effect a business combination with an existing, privately held company. The business combination may be structured as a reverse merger, consolidation, our exchange of stock or any other form which will effectuate the combined entity being a publicly held company. We intend to seek to acquire assets or shares of an entity actively engaged in business which generates revenues in exchange for its securities.

We do not propose to restrict our search for any investment opportunity to any particular industry, and may therefore, engage in essentially any business, to the extent of its limited resources.

We intend to seek a business opportunity in the form of firms which (i) have recently commenced operations, (ii) are seeking to develop a new product or service, or (iii) are established businesses.

We may or may not issue securities in any proposed business combination.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, ~~2011~~2013

The Company has earned no significant revenue or profits to date, and the Company anticipates that it will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future.

The Company incurred general and administrative expenses of $1314,~~261~~517 for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014, as compared to $712,~~579~~747 for the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2013.

From the date of return to development stage February 2, 2005, to December 31, 2012, the Company lost a total of $94,781. Most labor and services have been compensated with issuances of stock or cash that has been paid by our primary shareholder and resulted in the increase in the balance sheet account, "Advance from shareholder".

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. ~~During~~ ~~the~~The ~~period from February 2, 2005 (date of return to development stage) through December 31, 2012, the~~ Company has incurred an accumulated deficit of $93120,~~319~~583 primarily related to organizational and administrative expenses. We expect to incur losses into the foreseeable future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. ~~Management~~ Management recognizes that in order for us to meet our capital requirements, and continue to operate, additional financing will be necessary. To date the Company has financed its expenses primarily from shareholder loans, payments made by others on behalf of the company and by the settlement of payable amounts with shares of common stock.

~~Net cash provided by operating activities was $32 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $68 for the year ended December 31, 2011.~~8

Net cash ~~provided~~used by ~~financing~~operating activities was $0167 for the ~~years~~year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014, ~~and~~compared ~~2011~~to net cash provided by operating activities of $32 for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $0 for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $100 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The Company has limited financial resources available and has been unable to acquire significant funding which would allow the Company to pursue additional business, enable it to engage in research and development, or purchase revenue generating equipment. However, management has been successful in raising sufficient funds to cover the Company’s administrative expenses including the cost of auditing and other administrative costs.

The Company will continue to identify new financial partners and investors. However, there can be no assurance that any additional funds will be available on terms acceptable to the Company or at all. As of December 31, ~~2012~~2014, the company was authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of common stock.

Commitments

We do not have any commitments which are required to be disclosed in tabular form as of December 31, ~~2012~~2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, ~~2012~~2014, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements such as guarantees, retained or contingent interest in assets transferred, obligation under a derivative instrument and obligation arising out of or a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES, INC.

(AINDEX ~~DEVELOPMENT~~TO ~~STAGE~~CONSOLIDATED ~~COMPANY)~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~INDEX~~December TO31, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~2014 ~~FINANCIAL~~and ~~STATEMENTS~~ 2013

For the Period since Re-entering the Development Stage on

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F1

Consolidated Balance Sheets As of December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-3

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013	F-5

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F- 6 – F-10

~~February 2, 2005 to December 31, 2012~~ 10

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	11
Consolidated Balance Sheets As of December 31, 2012 and 2011	12
Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the Period since Re-entering the Development Stage on February 2, 2005 to December 31, 2012	13
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit Cumulative from February 2, 2005 to December 31, 2012	14
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the Period since Re-entering the Development Stage on February 2, 2005 to December 31, 2012	15
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	16-19

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

10To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.

~~Report~~We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ~~Independent~~International Industrial ~~Registered~~Enterprises, ~~Public~~Inc. ~~Accounting~~(the ~~Firm~~“Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

ToWe conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of ~~Directors~~material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of ~~International~~ ~~Industrial~~its ~~Enterprises~~internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, ~~Inc~~but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. (AAccordingly, ~~Development~~we ~~Stage~~express ~~Company)~~no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

WeIn our ~~have~~opinion, ~~audited~~based ~~the~~upon ~~accompanying~~our audit the consolidated ~~balance~~financial ~~sheets~~statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of International Industrial Enterprises, Inc. ~~(hereinafter the “Company”)~~ as of December 31, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011,~~2013 and the ~~related~~results ~~consolidated statements~~ of ~~operations,~~its ~~changes in stockholders' deficit,~~ operations and its cash flows for the years ~~then~~ ended ~~and since re-entering the development stage on February 2, 2005 through~~ December 31, ~~2012. These~~2014 ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~2013 ~~statements~~in ~~are~~conformity ~~the~~with ~~responsibility~~accounting ofprinciples ~~the~~generally ~~Company's~~accepted ~~management. Our~~in the ~~responsibility~~United isStates toof ~~express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits~~America.

WeThe ~~conducted~~accompanying ~~our~~consolidated ~~audits~~financial statements inhave ~~accordance~~been ~~with~~prepared assuming the ~~standards~~Company ofwill continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note B to the ~~Public~~financial statements, The Company ~~Accounting~~has ~~Oversight~~not ~~Board~~earned ~~(United~~any ~~States). Those~~revenue, ~~standards~~has ~~require~~suffered ~~that~~net welosses ~~plan~~ and ~~perform~~has ~~the~~had ~~audit~~negative tocash ~~obtain~~flows ~~reasonable~~from ~~assurance~~operating ~~about~~activities ~~whether~~ during the ~~consolidated~~year ~~financial~~ended ~~statements~~December ~~are~~31, ~~free~~2014 ofand ~~material misstatement~~2013. An ~~audit~~These ~~includes~~matters ~~examining,~~raise onsubstantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a ~~test~~going ~~basis,~~concern. ~~evidence~~Management’s ~~supporting~~plans ~~the~~concerning ~~amounts~~these ~~and~~matters ~~disclosures~~are also described in ~~the~~Note B. The consolidated financial statements~~. An~~ ~~audit~~do ~~also~~not ~~includes~~include ~~assessing~~any ~~the~~adjustments ~~accounting~~relating ~~principles~~to ~~used~~the recoverability and ~~significant~~classification ~~estimates~~of ~~made~~asset bycarrying ~~management,~~amounts asor ~~well~~the asamount and ~~evaluating~~classification ~~the~~of ~~overall~~liabilities ~~consolidated~~that ~~financial~~might ~~statement~~result ~~presentation. We~~should ~~believe~~the ~~that~~Company ~~our~~be ~~audits~~unable ~~provide~~to acontinue ~~reasonable~~as ~~basis~~a ~~for~~going ~~our opinion~~concern.

In/s/ ~~our~~KLJ ~~opinion,~~& ~~the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly~~Associates, inLLP ~~all~~KLJ ~~material~~& ~~respects~~Associates, ~~the~~LLP ~~financial~~St. ~~positions~~Louis ~~of the Company as of December 31~~Park, ~~2012~~MN ~~and~~March ~~December 31~~10, 2011, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended and since re-entering the development stage on February 2, 2005 through December 31, 2012 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.2015

We1660 ~~were~~South ~~not~~Highway engaged to examine management's assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon.100

~~The~~Suite accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered losses and has experienced negative cash flows from operations, which raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to those matters are also described in Note B to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.500

~~/s/~~St ~~SAM~~. ~~KAN~~Louis &Park, ~~COMPANY~~MN 55416

~~Sam Kan & Company, LLP~~630.277.2330

~~January 31, 2013~~F-1

~~Alameda~~International Industrial Enterprises, ~~California~~Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2014			2013
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$	8		$	75
Total current assets		8			75

Total assets	$	8		$	75

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT

Current liabilities
Related party loan (Note D)	$	29,373		$	29,373
Advance from shareholder (Note D)		48,033			33,583
Total current liabilities		77,406			62,956

Stockholders' deficit
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 2,500,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013		2,500			2,500
Additional paid-in capital		40,685			40,685
Accumulated deficit		(120,583	)		(106,066	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(77,398	)		(62,881	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	8		$	75

~~International~~See ~~Industrial~~accompanying ~~Enterprises,~~notes ~~Inc.~~to (Aconsolidated ~~Development~~financial ~~Stage Company) Consolidated Balance Sheets~~statements

	December 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	43		$	11
Total Current Assets		43			11
Total Assets	$	43		$	11
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Related party loan (Note D)	$	29,373		$	29,373
Advance from shareholder (Note D)		20,804			7,511
Total Current Liabilities		50,177			36,884
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit (Note E)
Common stock, par value $.001, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 2,500,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011.		2,500			2,500
Additional paid-in capital		40,685			40,685
Accumulated deficit		(93,319	)		(80,058	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(50,134	)		(36,873	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	43		$	11
See accompanying notes to financial statements

F-2

12International Industrial Enterprises, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations

International Industrial Enterprises, Inc. (A Development Stage Company)
	Year ended December 31,
Consolidated Statements of Operations
	2014			2013
For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the
Revenues	$	-		$	-
Period from February 2, 2005 to December 31, 2012
Operating expenses
	Years Ended December 31,						Cumulative since Re-entering the Development Stage on February 2, 2005 to December 31,
General and administrative		14,517			12,747
	2012			2011			2012
Total operating expenses		14,517			12,747
Revenue
Loss from operations		(14,517	)		(12,747	)
Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	1,462
Other expense
Operating expenses
Interest expense		-			-
General and administrative		13,261			7,579			81,243
Total other expense		-			-
Total operating expenses		13,261			7,579			81,243
Net loss	$	(14,517	)	$	(12,747	)
Loss from operations		(13,261	)		(7,579	)		(79,781	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)
Other income/(expense)
Weighted average shares outstanding		2,500,000			2,500,000
Interest expense		-			-			(15,000	)
Total other income (expense)		-			-			(15,000	)
Net loss	$	(13,261	)	$	(7,579	)	$	(94,781	)
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		2,500,000			2,500,000

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

13F-3

International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit
From February 2, 2005 through December 31, 2012
										Total
	Common Stock				Additional Paid		Accumulated			Stockholder's
	Shares		Amount		In Capital		Deficit			Deficit
Balance, December 31, 2005		2,500,000	$	2,500	$	40,685	$	(30,252	)	$	12,933
Net loss								(25,761	)		(25,761	)
Balance, December 31, 2006		2,500,000		2,500		40,685		(56,013	)		(12,828	)
Net loss								(2,286	)		(2,286	)
Balance, December 31, 2007		2,500,000		2,500		40,685		(58,299	)		(15,114	)
Net loss								(3,852	)		(3,852	)
Balance, December 31, 2008		2,500,000		2,500		40,685		(62,151	)		(18,966	)
Net loss								(6,909	)		(6,909	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		2,500,000		2,500		40,685		(69,060	)		(25,875	)
Net loss								(3,419	)		(3,419	)
Balance, December 31, 2010		2,500,000		2,500		40,685		(72,479	)		(29,294	)
Net loss								(7,579	)		(7,579	)
Balance, December 31, 2011		2,500,000	$	2,500	$	40,685	$	(80,058	)	$	(36,873	)
Net loss								(13,261	)		(13,261	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		2,500,000	$	2,500	$	40,685	$	(93,319	)	$	(50,134	)

International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit

For the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

See accompanying notes to financial statements

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in		Accumulated			Total Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Deficit
Balance, December 31, 2012		2,500,000	$	2,500	$	40,685	$	(93,319	)	$	(50,134	)
Net loss, year ended December 31, 2013		-		-		-		(12,747	)		(12,747	)
Balance, December 31, 2013		2,500,000		2,500		40,685		(106,066	)		(62,881	)

Net loss, year ended December 31, 2014		-		-		-		(14,517	)		(14,517	)
Balance, December 31, 2014		2,500,000	$	2,500	$	40,685	$	(120,583	)	$	(77,398	)

14See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and the
Period from February 2, 2005 to December 31, 2012
	Years Ended December 31,						Cumulative since Re-entering the Development Stage on February 2, 2005 to December 31,
Cash flows from operating activities	2012			2011			2012
Net loss	$	(13,261	)	$	(7,579	)	$	(94,781	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
in operating activities:		-			-			-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Advance from shareholder		13,293			7,511			20,804
Net cash used in operating activities		32			(68	)		(73,977	)
Cash flows from investing activities		-			-			-
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from related party note		-			-			29,373
Proceeds from stock issuance		-			-			43,185
Other items		-			-			1,462
Net cash provided by financing activities		-			-			74,020
Net change in cash		32			(68	)		43
Cash at beginning of period		11			79			-
Cash at end of period	$	43		$	11		$	43

F-4

~~See~~International ~~accompanying~~Industrial ~~notes~~Enterprises, toInc. ~~financial~~Consolidated ~~statements~~Statements of Cash Flows

	Year ended December 31,
	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(14,517	)	$	(12,747	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Expenses paid on behalf of company		14,350			12,779
Net cash used in operating activities		(167	)		32

Cash flows from investing activities		-			-

Cash flows from financing activities
Advances from shareholder		100			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		100			-

Cash, beginning of period		75			43
Net change in cash		(67	)		32
Cash, end of period	$	8		$	75

Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-

~~INTERNATIONAL~~See ~~INDUSTRIAL~~accompanying ~~ENTERPRISES,~~notes ~~INC.~~to consolidated financial statements

~~(A Development Stage Company)~~F-5

~~NOTES~~INTERNATIONAL TOINDUSTRIAL ~~THE~~ENTERPRISES, ~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~INC.

~~For~~NOTES ~~the~~TO ~~Period~~THE ~~since~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Re-entering~~FINANCIAL ~~the Development Stage on February 2, 2005 to December 31, 2012~~ STATEMENTS

~~NOTE~~December A31, –2014 ~~ORGANIZATION~~and ~~AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS~~2013

~~International~~NOTE ~~Industrial~~A ~~Enterprises,~~– ~~Inc.~~ORGANIZATION ~~(sometimes~~AND ~~the~~DESCRIPTION ~~“Company”)~~OF ~~was incorporated on November 19, 1976 under the laws of the State of Delaware to engage in any lawful corporate activity.~~BUSINESS

WeInternational ~~were engaged in real estate investments from formation until April 1982 and we were dormant until July 29~~Industrial Enterprises, ~~1994~~Inc. As at(sometimes ~~July~~the ~~31,~~“Company”) ~~1994,~~was weincorporated ~~were~~on ~~deemed~~November ~~to be a developmental stage company and all funds raised in order to fulfill our initial objective had been expanded. Thereafter~~19, we1976 ~~had~~under ~~very~~the ~~limited~~laws ~~operations~~of ~~until~~the ~~June~~State ~~14,~~of ~~2004 when we purchased Karlton Management, Inc., whose name was changed~~ Delaware to ~~Group~~engage ~~One~~in ~~Associates~~any ~~Inc.,~~lawful acorporate ~~Nevada Corporation~~activity.

InWe ~~2004, we~~ were engaged in ~~the~~real estate ~~designing~~investments ~~and~~from ~~printing~~formation ~~tourist~~until ~~maps~~April ~~for~~1982 ~~various~~and ~~Las~~we ~~Vegas~~were ~~destinations. Our~~dormant ~~business~~until ~~stalled~~July ~~for eight months due to the death of our President in October 2006. On June 18~~29, ~~2007, a new President was elected and we restarted our business~~1994. ~~While~~ weAs ~~did~~at ~~not~~July ~~own~~31, ~~any printing equipment~~1994, we ~~intended to job-out our printing needs (maps) to established printing companies. Our tourist maps~~ were deemed to be ~~printed~~a ondevelopmental ~~quality~~stage ~~paper~~company ~~stock~~ and ~~our~~all ~~map~~funds ~~designs~~raised ~~were~~in toorder ~~be comical as well as informational. We intended~~ to ~~hire~~fulfill ~~experienced advertising salesmen to sell advertising space on~~ our ~~maps. There~~initial isobjective ~~vigorous~~had ~~competition~~been ~~in the publishing and distribution of maps of Las Vegas~~expanded. ~~Some~~ ofThereafter, we ~~these~~had ~~maps~~very ~~are~~limited ~~sold~~operations ~~and~~until ~~some~~June ~~are~~14, ~~free. We~~2004 ~~intended~~when towe ~~compete~~purchased byKarlton ~~offering~~Management, ~~a free Las Vegas map with advertisers~~Inc., ~~which~~whose ~~feature~~name ~~main~~was ~~thoroughfares~~changed ~~(no~~to ~~secondary~~Group One ~~roads)~~Associates ~~and the location of Hotels~~Inc., ~~Casinos,~~a ~~Restaurants~~Nevada ~~and tourist locations~~Corporation.

WeIn ~~currently~~2004, ~~have~~we ~~conducted~~were noengaged in the designing and printing tourist maps for various Las Vegas destinations. Our business ~~that~~stalled ~~has~~for ~~resulted~~eight months due to the death of our President in October 2006. On June 18, 2007, a new President was elected and we restarted our business. While we did not own any ~~income~~printing equipment, we intended to job-out our printing needs (maps) to established printing companies. Our tourist maps were to be printed on quality paper stock and our map designs were to be comical as well as informational. We intended to hire experienced advertising salesmen to sell advertising space on our maps. There is vigorous competition in the ~~company~~publishing and distribution of maps of Las Vegas. Some of these maps are sold and some are free. We intended to compete by offering a free Las Vegas map with advertisers, which feature main thoroughfares (no secondary roads) and the location of Hotels, Casinos, Restaurants and tourist locations.

~~NOTE~~We Bcurrently –have ~~GOING~~conducted no ~~CONCERN~~business that has resulted in revenue to the company.

~~The~~NOTE ~~accompanying~~B ~~financial~~– ~~statements~~GOING have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. During the period from February 2, 2005 (date of return to development stage) through December 31, 2012, the Company has incurred an accumulated deficit of $93,319 primarily related to organizational and administrative expenses. The Company has a working capital deficit of $50,134. We expect to incur losses into the foreseeable future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management recognizes that in order for us to meet our capital requirements, and continue to operate, additional financing will be necessary. To date the Company has financed its expenses primarily from shareholder loans, payments made by others on behalf of the company and by the settlement of payable amounts with shares of common stock.CONCERN

The ~~Company~~accompanying ~~has~~financial statements ~~limited~~have ~~financial~~been ~~resources~~prepared ~~available~~assuming ~~and~~we ~~has~~will ~~been~~continue ~~unable~~as a going concern. During the period from February 2, 2005 (date of return to ~~acquire~~development ~~significant~~stage) ~~funding~~through ~~which~~December ~~would~~31, ~~allow~~2014, the Company tohas ~~pursue~~incurred ~~additional~~an ~~business,~~accumulated ~~enable~~deficit itof to$120,583 ~~engage~~primarily inrelated to ~~research~~organizational and ~~development~~administrative expenses. The Company has a working capital deficit of $77,398 orWe ~~purchase~~expect ~~revenue~~to ~~generating~~incur ~~equipment~~losses into the foreseeable future. ~~However,~~ ~~management~~These ~~has~~conditions ~~been~~raise ~~successful~~substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management recognizes that in ~~raising~~order ~~sufficient~~for ~~funds~~us to ~~cover~~meet our capital requirements, and continue to operate, additional financing will be necessary. To date the Company’s ~~administrative~~has financed its expenses ~~including~~primarily ~~the~~from ~~cost~~shareholder loans, payments made by others on behalf of ~~auditing~~the company and ~~other~~by the ~~administrative~~settlement ~~costs~~of payable amounts with shares of common stock.

The Company ~~will~~has ~~continue~~limited financial resources available and has been unable to ~~identify~~acquire ~~new~~significant ~~financial~~funding ~~partners~~which ~~and~~would ~~investors. However~~allow the Company to pursue additional business, ~~there~~enable ~~can~~it beto noengage ~~assurance~~in ~~that~~research ~~any~~and ~~additional~~development, ~~funds~~or ~~will~~purchase berevenue ~~available~~generating onequipment. ~~terms~~However, ~~acceptable~~management has been successful in raising sufficient funds to cover the Company’s oradministrative atexpenses ~~all~~including the cost of auditing and other administrative costs.

16The Company will continue to identify new financial partners and investors. However, there can be no assurance that any additional funds will be available on terms acceptable to the Company or at all.

~~NOTE C~~ F- ~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~6

~~Principles~~INTERNATIONAL ofINDUSTRIAL ~~Consolidation~~ENTERPRISES, INC.

~~The~~NOTES ~~accompanying~~TO ~~consolidated~~THE ~~financial~~CONSOLIDATED ~~statements~~FINANCIAL ~~include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Group One Associates Inc. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.~~STATEMENTS

~~Estimates~~December 31, 2014 and 2013

~~The~~NOTE ~~preparation~~C of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and use assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. On an on-~~going~~ ~~basis,~~SUMMARY ~~the~~OF ~~Company~~SIGNIFICANT ~~evaluates its estimates. Actual results and outcomes may differ materially from these estimates and assumptions.~~ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~Cash~~Principles ~~and~~of ~~Cash~~Consolidation ~~Equivalents~~

~~For~~The ~~purposes~~accompanying ~~of the~~ consolidated financial ~~statement~~statements ofinclude ~~cash~~the ~~flows,~~accounts of the Company ~~considers~~and ~~all~~its ~~short~~wholly-~~term~~owned ~~debt~~subsidiary, ~~securities~~Group ~~purchased~~One ~~with~~Associates ~~maturity~~Inc. ofAll ~~three~~intercompany accounts ~~months~~and ortransactions ~~less~~have tobeen ~~be cash equivalents~~eliminated.

~~Fair Value Measurement~~Estimates

The ~~Company~~preparation ~~measures~~of ~~fair~~the Company’s ~~value~~consolidated asfinancial ~~the~~statements ~~price~~requires ~~that~~management ~~would~~to bemake ~~received~~estimates toand ~~sell~~use anassumptions ~~asset~~that oraffect ~~paid~~the toreported amounts ~~transfer~~of aassets, ~~liability~~liabilities, ~~(an~~revenues, ~~exit~~and ~~price)~~expenses. inThese anestimates ~~orderly~~and ~~transaction~~assumptions ~~between~~are ~~market~~affected ~~participants~~by atmanagement’s ~~the~~application of ~~reporting~~accounting ~~date~~policies. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~On ~~utilizes~~an ~~a three~~on-~~tier~~going ~~hierarchy~~basis, ~~which~~the ~~prioritizes~~Company ~~the~~evaluates ~~inputs~~its ~~used~~estimates. inActual ~~the~~results ~~valuation~~and ~~methodologies~~outcomes inmay ~~measuring~~differ ~~fair~~materially from ~~value:~~these estimates and assumptions.

~~Level~~Cash 1.and ~~Valuations~~Cash ~~based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access. The Company has no assets or liabilities valued with Level 1 inputs.~~Equivalents

~~Level~~For 2.purposes ~~Valuations~~of ~~based~~the onconsolidated statement ~~quoted~~of ~~prices~~cash ~~for similar assets or liabilities~~flows, ~~quoted~~the ~~prices~~Company ~~for~~considers ~~identical~~all ~~assets~~short-term ordebt ~~liabilities~~securities inpurchased ~~markets~~with ~~that~~maturity ~~are~~of ~~not~~three ~~active,~~months or ~~other~~less ~~inputs that are observable or can~~ to be ~~corroborated~~cash ~~by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities~~equivalents. ~~The Company has no assets or liabilities valued with Level 2 inputs.~~

~~Level~~Fair 3.Value Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The Company has no assets or liabilities valued with Level 3 inputs.Measurement

~~Fair~~The ~~Value~~Company ofmeasures ~~Financial~~fair value ~~Instruments~~as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The Company utilizes a three-tier hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value:

~~The~~Level ~~carrying~~1. ~~value~~Valuations ofbased ~~cash~~on ~~and~~quoted prices ~~cash~~in ~~equivalents,~~active ~~accounts~~markets ~~payable,~~for ~~and~~identical ~~accrued~~assets or liabilities ~~approximate~~that ~~their~~an ~~fair~~entity ~~value~~has ~~because of~~ the ~~short-term~~ability ~~nature~~to ~~of these instruments and their liquidity~~access. ~~Management~~ isThe ~~of the opinion that the~~ Company ishas ~~not~~no ~~exposed to significant interest~~ assets or ~~credit~~liabilities ~~risks~~valued ~~arising~~with ~~from~~Level ~~these~~1 ~~financial instruments~~inputs.

~~Income~~Level ~~Taxes~~2. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company has no assets or liabilities valued with Level 2 inputs.

~~The~~Level ~~Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method~~3. ~~Under~~ ~~the~~Valuations ~~asset~~based ~~and~~on ~~liability~~inputs that ~~method, deferred tax assets and liabilities~~ are ~~recognized~~supported ~~for~~by ~~the~~little ~~future~~or ~~tax~~no ~~consequences~~market ~~attributed~~activity ~~to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~that ~~and their respective tax bases and tax credits and loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities~~ are ~~measured~~significant ~~using enacted tax rates expected~~ to ~~apply to taxable income in~~ the ~~years~~fair invalue ~~which those temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities~~ of ~~a change in tax rates is recognized in income in~~ the ~~period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax~~ assets toor ~~amounts expected to be realized~~liabilities. The Company ~~reports~~has ano ~~liability~~assets ~~for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain income tax positions taken~~ or ~~expected~~liabilities tovalued bewith ~~taken~~Level in3 ~~an income tax return~~inputs. ~~Estimated interest and penalties are recorded as a component of interest expense or other expense, respectively. See “Note G. Income Taxes” for further discussion.~~

17Fair Value of Financial Instruments

~~Net~~The ~~Income~~carrying ~~(Loss)~~value ~~Per~~of ~~Share~~cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments and their liquidity. Management is of the opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45-10, the computation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is based on the weighted average number of shares that were outstanding during the period, including shares of common stock that are issuable at the end of the reporting period. The computation of diluted EPS is based on the number of basic weighted-average shares outstanding plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming the exercise of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding using the treasury stock method. However, pursuant to ASC 260-10-45-17, the computation of diluted net income per share shall not assume conversion, exercise or contingent issuance of securities that would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. Therefore, when calculating EPS if the Company experienced a loss, there is no inclusion of dilutive securities as their inclusion in the EPS calculation is antidilutive. Furthermore, pursuant to ASC 260-10-45-25, options and warrants will have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options or warrants (they are in the money). See “Note F~~. Net Loss Per Share” for further discussion.~~-7

~~Goodwill~~INTERNATIONAL ~~and~~INDUSTRIAL ~~Other~~ENTERPRISES, ~~Intangible Assets~~INC.

~~Goodwill~~NOTES ~~and~~TO ~~other~~THE ~~intangible~~CONSOLIDATED ~~assets~~FINANCIAL with indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized, but are evaluated for impairment annually, or immediately if conditions indicate that impairment could exist. The evaluation requires a two-step impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of a goodwill impairment loss. The first step of the test compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss. Both steps of the goodwill impairment testing involve significant estimates.STATEMENTS

~~Recently~~December ~~Adopted~~31, ~~Accounting~~2014 ~~Pronouncements~~and 2013

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company~~C ~~reviews~~- ~~new~~SUMMARY ~~accounting~~OF ~~standards~~SIGNIFICANT asACCOUNTING POLICIES issued. Although some of these accounting standards issued or effective after the end of the Company’s previous fiscal year may be applicable to the Company, it has not identified any standards that it believes merit further discussion. The Company believes that none of the new standards will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.(CONTINUED)

~~NOTE~~Income ~~D - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS~~Taxes

AThe ~~related~~Company ~~party~~accounts isfor income ~~generally~~taxes ~~defined~~using asthe ~~(i)~~asset ~~any~~and ~~person~~liability ~~that~~method. ~~holds~~Under ~~10%~~the orasset ~~more~~and ofliability ~~the~~method, ~~Company’s~~deferred ~~securities~~tax assets and ~~their~~liabilities ~~immediate~~are recognized ~~families,~~for ~~(ii)~~the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the ~~Company’s~~financial ~~management,~~statement ~~(iii)~~carrying ~~someone~~amounts ~~that~~of ~~directly~~existing assets orand ~~indirectly~~liabilities ~~controls,~~and istheir ~~controlled~~respective bytax orbases isand ~~under~~tax ~~common~~credits ~~control~~and ~~with~~loss ~~the~~carry-forwards. ~~Company,~~Deferred ortax ~~(iv)~~assets ~~anyone~~and ~~who~~liabilities are ~~can~~measured ~~significantly~~using ~~influence~~enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the ~~financial~~years in which those temporary differences and carry-forwards ~~operating~~are ~~decisions~~expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the ~~Company~~period that includes the enactment date. A ~~transaction~~valuation allowance is ~~considered~~established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized. The Company reports a ~~related~~liability ~~party~~for ~~transaction~~unrecognized ~~when~~tax ~~there~~benefits isresulting from uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken in an income tax return. Estimated interest and penalties are recorded as a ~~transfer~~component of ~~resources~~interest expense or ~~obligations~~other ~~between~~expense, ~~related~~respectively. ~~parties~~See “Note G. Income Taxes” for further discussion.

~~The~~Net ~~Company~~Income ~~has~~(Loss) anPer unsecured non-interest bearing related party loan in the amount of $29,373 at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. This advance is from, Jose Fernando Garcia, a shareholder with 20% of the Company’s outstanding common shares. The proceeds were used for daily business operations. The loan bears no interest and it is due on demand.Share

~~During~~Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45-10, the ~~year~~computation ~~ended~~of ~~December~~basic 31earnings per share (“EPS”) is based on the weighted average number of shares that were outstanding during the period, ~~2012~~including ~~and~~shares ~~2011~~of common stock that are issuable at the end of the reporting period. The computation of diluted EPS is based on the number of basic weighted-average shares outstanding plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming the exercise of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding using the treasury stock method. However, ~~Jose~~pursuant ~~Fernando~~to ~~Garcia~~ASC ~~advanced~~260-10-45-17, the ~~$13~~computation of diluted net income per share shall not assume conversion,~~293~~ ~~and~~exercise $7or contingent issuance of securities that would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. Therefore,~~511~~ when calculating EPS if the Company experienced a loss, ~~respectively~~there is no inclusion of dilutive securities as their inclusion in the EPS calculation is antidilutive. Furthermore, pursuant to ASC 260-10-45-25, options and warrants will have a dilutive effect under the ~~Company~~treasury bystock ~~making~~method ~~payments~~only ~~for~~when ~~administrative~~the ~~expenses~~average onmarket ~~behalf~~price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the ~~Company~~options or warrants (they are in the money). See “Note F. Net Loss Per Share” for further discussion.

~~NOTE~~Recently EAdopted -Accounting ~~CAPITAL STOCK~~Pronouncements

The Company reviews new accounting standards as issued. Although some of these accounting standards issued or effective after the end of the Company’s previous fiscal year may be applicable to the Company, it has nonot ~~authorized~~identified ~~preferred~~any ~~stock~~standards that it believes merit further discussion. The Company believes that none of the new standards will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company~~D ~~had~~- ~~authorized~~RELATED ~~Fifty~~PARTY ~~Million (50,000,000) shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 as of December 31, 2012. There were 2,500,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012.~~TRANSACTIONS

18A related party is generally defined as (i) any person that holds 10% or more of the Company’s securities and their immediate families, (ii) the Company’s management, (iii) someone that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Company, or (iv) anyone who can significantly influence the financial and operating decisions of the Company. A transaction is considered to be a related party transaction when there is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties.

~~NOTE~~The FCompany has an unsecured non-interest ~~NET~~bearing ~~LOSS~~related ~~PER~~party ~~SHARE~~loan in the amount of $29,373 at December 31, 2014and December 31, 2013. This advance is from Jose Fernando Garcia, a shareholder with 20% of the Company’s outstanding common shares. The proceeds were used for daily business operations. The loan bears no interest and it is due on demand.

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. There are no potentially dilutive securities or derivative instruments outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.F-8

~~Following~~INTERNATIONAL isINDUSTRIAL ~~the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the years ended December 31~~ENTERPRISES, ~~2012 and 2011:~~INC.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011
Basic and Diluted EPS Computation
Numerator:
Loss available to common stockholders'	$	(13,261	)	$	(7,579	)
Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		2,500,000			2,500,000
Basic and diluted EPS	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~NOTE~~December G31, –2014 ~~INCOME~~and ~~TAXES~~2013

NoNOTE ~~provisions~~D ~~for~~- ~~income~~RELATED ~~taxes~~PARTY ~~have~~TRANSACTIONS ~~been recorded since the Company has incurred losses since inception.~~(CONTUNED)

~~Based~~During ~~on management‘s present assessment,~~ the ~~Company~~years ~~has not yet determined it to be more likely than not that a deferred tax asset attributable to the future utilization of net operating loss carry forwards as of~~ ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 ~~will~~and ~~be realized. Accordingly~~2013, ~~the~~Jose ~~Company~~Fernando ~~has~~Garcia ~~provided~~advanced a$14,450 ~~100%~~and ~~allowance~~$12,779, ~~against~~respectively, ~~the~~to ~~deferred tax asset in~~ the ~~financial statements at December 31, 2012. The~~ Company ~~will~~by ~~continue~~making topayments for ~~review~~administrative ~~this~~expenses ~~valuation~~on ~~allowance~~behalf ~~and~~of ~~make~~the ~~adjustments as appropriate~~Company.

~~Current~~NOTE ~~United~~E ~~States~~- ~~tax~~CAPITAL laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited.STOCK

~~NOTE~~The HCompany –has ~~SUBSEQUENT~~no ~~EVENTS~~authorized preferred stock.

~~Pursuant~~The toCompany ~~FASB~~had ~~Accounting~~authorized Fifty ~~Standards~~Million ~~Codification 855~~(50,000,000) ~~Subsequent~~shares ~~Events~~of common stock with a par value of $0.001 as of December 31, ~~Including~~2014. ~~ASC~~There ~~855-10-S99-~~were 2,500,000 ~~the~~shares of ~~Company~~common ~~evaluated~~stock ~~subsequent~~issued ~~events~~and ~~through~~outstanding ~~the~~as ~~date~~ of ~~this~~December ~~report. No~~31, ~~additional~~2014 ~~disclosures~~and ~~required~~2013.

19NOTE F - NET LOSS PER SHARE

~~ITEM~~Basic 9net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. ~~CHANGES~~ INThere ~~AND~~are no potentially ~~DISAGREEMENTS~~dilutive ~~WITH~~securities ~~ACCOUNTANTS~~or ONderivative ~~ACCOUNTING~~instruments ~~AND~~outstanding ~~FINANCIAL~~as ~~DISCLOSURE~~of December 31, 2014 or 2013.

~~None.~~Following is the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

ITEM 9A. (T) CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

	Year Ended December 31,
Numerator:	2014			2013
Loss available to common stockholders	$	(14,517	)	$	(12,747	)

Denominator:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		2,500,000			2,500,000

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

~~(a)~~NOTE ~~Evaluation~~G of– ~~Disclosure~~INCOME ~~Controls and Procedures~~TAXES

~~Under~~No ~~the~~provisions ~~supervision~~for ~~and~~income taxes ~~with~~have ~~the~~been participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of December 31, 2012 that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, ~~processed,~~since ~~summarized and reported within~~ the ~~time~~Company ~~periods~~has ~~specified~~incurred inlosses ~~SEC~~since rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosureinception.

~~(b)~~Based ~~Management’~~on management‘s present ~~Report~~assessment, onthe ~~Internal~~Company ~~Control~~has ~~over~~not ~~Financial~~yet ~~Reporting~~determined it to be more likely than not that a deferred tax asset attributable to the future utilization of net operating loss carry forwards as of December 31, 2014 will be realized. Accordingly, the Company has provided a 100% allowance against the deferred tax asset in the financial statements at December 31, 2014 and 2013. The Company will continue to review this valuation allowance and make adjustments as appropriate.

~~Our~~Current ~~management~~United isStates ~~responsible~~tax laws ~~for~~limit ~~establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under~~ the ~~supervision~~amount ~~and with the participation~~ of ~~our~~loss ~~management,~~available ~~including~~to ~~our~~be ~~Chief~~offset ~~Executive~~against ~~Officer~~future ~~and~~taxable ~~Chief~~income ~~Financial~~when ~~Officer,~~a wesubstantial ~~conducted~~change ~~an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework~~ in ~~Internal~~ownership ~~Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission~~occurs. ~~Based on this evaluation and on these criteria~~ Therefore, ~~management~~the ~~concluded~~amount ~~that~~available ~~our~~to ~~internal~~offset ~~control~~future ~~over~~taxable ~~financial~~income ~~reporting~~may ~~was~~be ~~not effective as of December 31, 2012~~limited.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the DoddF-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which permanently exempts non-accelerated filers (generally issuers with a public float under $75 million) from complying with Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.9

~~(c)~~INTERNATIONAL ~~Changes~~INDUSTRIAL inENTERPRISES, ~~Internal Control over Financial Reporting~~INC.

~~There~~NOTES ~~were~~TO noTHE ~~changes~~CONSOLIDATED inFINANCIAL our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.STATEMENTS

~~ITEM~~December ~~9B. OTHER~~31, ~~INFORMATION~~2014 and 2013

~~None.~~NOTE H – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

20Pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 855, Subsequent Events, Including ASC 855-10-S99-2, the Company evaluated subsequent events through the date of this report. No additional disclosures required.

~~PART III~~F-10

ITEM 10 9. ~~DIRECTORS,~~ CHANGES ~~EXECUTIVE~~IN ~~OFFICERS~~AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND ~~CORPORATE~~FINANCIAL ~~GOVERNANCE~~DISCLOSURE.

~~The following table sets forth information concerning our officers and directors as of December 31, 2011:~~None.

Name	Age	Title
David W. Rodgers	49	President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director.

ITEM 9A. (T) CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

~~Our~~(a) Evaluation ~~officers and directors are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting~~ of ~~shareholders~~Disclosure ~~and~~Controls ~~until their respective successors have been elected~~ and ~~qualified,~~Procedures ~~or until prior resignation or removal.~~

~~Business~~Under the ~~Experience~~supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of December 31, 2014 that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~David~~(b) Management’s W.Report ~~Rodgers,~~on ~~President,~~Internal ~~Secretary~~Control ~~Treasurer,~~over ~~Director.~~Financial Reporting

2001 to 2007	R4 Services, Owner/Internet Sales and Marketing Services.
1998 to 2001	Research 2000, Director/ Public Relations and Advertising
1995 to 1997	Phoenix Media Group/Sales/Account Manager
1991 to 1994	Special Alert Publications, Owner/Newsletter and Corporate Report.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation and on these criteria, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2014.

~~Education~~This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which permanently exempts non-accelerated filers (generally issuers with a public float under $75 million) from complying with Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

1981	University of Notre Dame Bachelor of Science Degree, Engineering Sciences.
1997 to Present.	Web Design and Internet Marketing courses at community colleges, seminars, workshop and on-line.
1983 to Present.	Sales and Business courses at community colleges, seminars, workshop and on-line.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

~~Legal~~There were ~~Proceedings~~no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~None of or Directors or officers are involved in any legal proceedings as described in Regulation S-K (§ 229~~ITEM 9B.~~401(f)).~~ OTHER INFORMATION

~~Code of Ethics~~None.

~~We have not adopted a Code of Ethics given our limited operations. We expect that our Board of Directors following a merger or other acquisition transaction will adopt a Code of Ethics.~~11

~~Committees of the Board of Directors~~PART III

~~As we only have one board member and given our limited operations, we do not have separate or independent audit, compensation or any other committees~~ITEM 10. ~~Our Board of Directors has determined that it does not have an “audit committee financial expert~~ DIRECTORS,” asEXECUTIVE ~~that~~OFFICERS ~~term~~AND isCORPORATE ~~defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K~~GOVERNANCE. ~~In addition, we have not adopted any procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.~~

~~Section~~The following ~~16(a)~~table ~~Beneficial~~sets ~~Ownership~~forth ~~Reporting~~information ~~Compliance~~concerning our officers and directors as of December 31, 2014:

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our Common Stock (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”) to report their ownership-of and transactions-in our Common Stock to the SEC. Copies of these reports are also required to be supplied to us. To our knowledge, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 the Reporting Persons complied with all applicable Section 16(a) reporting requirements.

Name	Age	Title

David W. Rodgers	51	President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director.

21Our officers and directors are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified, or until prior resignation or removal.

~~ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.~~Business Experience

David W. Rodgers, ~~Rogers~~President, isSecretary our sole officer and director. Mr. Rogers does not receive any regular compensation for his services rendered on our behalf. Mr. Rogers did not receive any compensation during the years ended December 31Treasurer, ~~2012 and 2011~~Director. ~~No officer or director is required to make any specific amount or percentage of his business time available to us.~~

Director Compensation

2001 to 2007		R4 Services, Owner/Internet Sales and Marketing Services.
1998 to 2001		Research 2000, Director/ Public Relations and Advertising
1995 to 1997		Phoenix Media Group/Sales/Account Manager
1991 to 1994		Special Alert Publications, Owner/Newsletter and Corporate Report.

~~We do not currently pay any cash fees to our sole director, nor do we pay director’s expenses in attending board meetings.~~Education

Employment Agreements

1981		University of Notre Dame Bachelor of Science Degree, Engineering Sciences.

1997 to Present.		Web Design and Internet Marketing courses at community colleges, seminars, workshop and on-line.

1983 to Present.		Sales and Business courses at community colleges, seminars, workshop and on-line.

~~We are not a party to any employment agreements.~~Legal Proceedings

~~Other~~None of or Directors or officers are involved in any legal proceedings as described in Regulation S-K (§ 229.401(f)).

~~We have no retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs for the benefit~~ Code of ~~its~~Ethics ~~employees.~~

~~ITEM~~We have 12not adopted a Code of Ethics given our limited operations. ~~SECURITY~~ ~~OWNERSHIP~~We OFexpect ~~CERTAIN~~that ~~BENEFICIAL~~our ~~OWNERS~~Board ~~AND~~of ~~MANAGEMENT~~Directors ~~AND~~following ~~RELATED~~a ~~STOCKHOLDER~~merger ~~MATTERS~~or other acquisition transaction will adopt a Code of Ethics.

~~The following table sets forth certain information as~~ Committees of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~Board ~~2012 by (i) all persons who are known by us to beneficially own more than 5%~~ of ~~our outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each director, director nominee, and Named Executive Officer; and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group:~~Directors

Name and address of Beneficial Owner	Position	Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1)	Percent of Class Owned (1)
David W. Rodgers	Pres/Sec/Treas/Dir.	500,000	20%
3172 N. Rainbow Blvd. #215.
Las Vegas, NV 89108
Jose F. Garcia	Beneficial Owner	500,000	20%
4116 Antique Sterling Ct.
Las Vegas, NV 89129

As we only have one board member and given our limited operations, we do not have separate or independent audit, compensation or any other committees. Our Board of Directors has determined that it does not have an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. In addition, we have not adopted any procedures by which our shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

Section 16(1a) ~~Calculated~~ ~~pursuant to rule 13d-3(d) of the Exchange Act.~~ Beneficial ~~ownership~~Ownership isReporting ~~calculated~~Compliance based on 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on a fully diluted basis as of December 31, 2012. Under Rule 13d-3(d) of the Exchange Act, shares not outstanding which are subject to options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned by each other person listed.

WeSection 16(a) ~~currently~~of dothe ~~not~~Exchange ~~maintain~~Act ~~any~~requires ~~equity~~our ~~compensation~~directors ~~plans~~and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our Common Stock (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”) to report their ownership-of and transactions-in our Common Stock to the SEC. Copies of these reports are also required to be supplied to us. To our knowledge, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 the Reporting Persons complied with all applicable Section 16(a) reporting requirements.

2212

ITEM 13 11. ~~CERTAIN~~ EXECUTIVE ~~RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE~~COMPENSATION.

WeDavid W. doRodgers ~~not~~is ~~have~~our asole ~~formal~~officer ~~written policy for the review~~ and ~~approval of transactions with related parties~~director. ~~However,~~ Mr. ~~our~~Rodgers ~~employees~~does ~~are expected to disclose personal interests that may conflict with ours and they may~~ not ~~engage~~receive inany ~~personal~~regular ~~activities~~compensation ~~that~~for ~~conflict~~his ~~with~~services ~~their~~rendered on ~~responsibilities~~our ~~and~~behalf. ~~obligations to us~~Mr. ~~Periodically,~~ weRodgers ~~inquire~~did ~~as to whether or~~ not receive any ofcompensation ~~our~~during ~~Directors~~the ~~have~~years ~~entered~~ended ~~into~~December ~~any transactions~~31, ~~arrangements~~2014 or ~~relationships that constitute related party transactions~~2013. If No ~~any actual~~ officer or ~~potential~~director ~~conflict of interest~~ is ~~reported,~~required ~~our~~to ~~entire~~make ~~Board~~any ~~and~~specific ~~outside~~amount ~~legal~~or ~~counsel~~percentage ~~review the transaction and relationship disclosed and the Board makes a formal determination regarding each Director's independence. If the transaction is deemed to present a conflict~~ of ~~interest,~~his ~~the~~business ~~Board~~time ~~will~~available ~~determine the appropriate action~~ to ~~be taken~~us.

~~Transactions with Related Persons~~Director Compensation

~~The~~We do ~~Board~~not iscurrently ~~responsible~~pay ~~for~~any ~~review,~~cash ~~approval,~~fees orto ~~ratification~~our ofsole ~~"related-person transactions" involving International Industrial Enterprises~~director, ~~Inc.~~nor ordo ~~its~~we ~~subsidiaries~~pay ~~and related persons. Under SEC rules (Section 404 (a) of Regulation S-K), a related person is a~~ director,’s ~~officer,~~expenses nominee for director, or 5% stockholder of the company since the beginning of the previous fiscal year, and their immediate family members. International Industrial Enterprises, Inc. is required to report any transaction or series of transactions in ~~which~~attending ~~the~~board ~~company or a subsidiary is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person has a direct or indirect material interest~~meetings.

~~The Board has determined that, barring additional facts or circumstances, a related person does not have a direct or indirect material interest in the following categories of transactions:~~Employment Agreements

●We are ~~any~~not ~~transaction with another company for which~~ a ~~related~~party ~~person's~~to ~~only~~any ~~relationship~~employment is as an employee (other than an executive officer), director, or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company's shares, if the amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that company's total annual revenue;agreements.

~~● compensation to executive officers determined by the Board;~~Other

●We have ~~compensation~~no toretirement, ~~directors~~pension, ~~determined~~profit bysharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs for the ~~Board;~~benefit of its employees.

●ITEM 12. SECURITY ~~transactions~~OWNERSHIP inOF ~~which~~CERTAIN ~~all~~BENEFICIAL ~~security~~OWNERS ~~holders~~AND ~~receive~~MANAGEMENT ~~proportional~~AND ~~benefits;~~RELATED ~~and~~STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

●The following ~~banking-related~~table ~~services~~sets ~~involving~~forth acertain ~~bank~~information ~~depository~~as of ~~funds~~December 31, ~~transfer~~2014 ~~agent,~~by ~~registrar~~(i) all persons who are known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, ~~trustee~~(ii) ~~under~~each adirector, ~~trust~~director ~~indenture~~nominee, orand ~~similar~~Named ~~service.~~Executive Officer; and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group:

The Board reviews transactions involving related persons who are not included in one of the above categories and makes a determination whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may approve, ratify, rescind, or take other action with respect to the transaction in its discretion. The Board reviews all material facts related to the transaction and takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances; the extent of the related person's interest in the transaction; and, if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable products or services.

Name and address of Beneficial Owner	Position	Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned⁽¹⁾		Percent of Class Owned ⁽¹⁾

David W. Rodgers 1982 Rainbow Blvd. # 101. Las Vegas, NV 89108	Pres/Sec/Treas/Dir.		500,000		20	%

Jose F. Garcia 4116 Antique Sterling Ct. Las Vegas, NV 89129	Beneficial Owner		500,000		20	%

~~There~~(1) Calculated pursuant ~~were~~to norule ~~related~~13d-3(d) ~~party~~of ~~transactions~~the ~~pursuant~~Exchange toAct. ~~the~~Beneficial ~~above~~ownership ~~during~~is ~~the~~calculated ~~years~~based ~~ended~~on 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on a fully diluted basis as of December 31, ~~2012~~2014. ~~and~~Under ~~2011.~~Rule ~~For~~13d-3(d) ~~related~~of ~~party~~the ~~transactions~~Exchange ~~that~~Act, doshares not ~~exceed~~outstanding which ~~$120~~are subject to options,~~000~~ ~~please~~warrants, ~~see~~rights ~~“Note~~or Dconversion -privileges ~~Related~~exercisable ~~Party~~within ~~Transactions”~~60 indays are deemed outstanding for the ~~consolidated~~purpose ~~notes~~of tocalculating the ~~financial~~number ~~statements~~and ~~included~~percentage inowned ~~this~~by ~~Form~~such ~~10-K~~person, but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned by each other person listed.

~~Review,~~We currently ~~Approval~~do ornot ~~Ratification~~maintain ofany ~~Transactions~~equity ~~with~~compensation ~~Related Persons~~plans.

Our unwritten policy with regard to transactions with related persons is that all material transactions are to be reviewed by the entire Board for any possible conflicts of interest. In the event of a potential conflict of interest, the Board will generally evaluate the transaction in terms of the following standards: (i) the benefits to us; (ii) the impact on a director’s independence in the event the related person is a director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or executive officer; (iii) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (iv) the terms and conditions of the transaction; and (v) the terms available to unrelated parties or the employees generally. The Board will then document its findings and conclusion in written minutes.13

23ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

~~ITEM~~We do 14not have a formal written policy for the review and approval of transactions with related parties. ~~PRINCIPAL~~ ~~ACCOUNTANT~~However, ~~FEES~~our ~~AND~~employees ~~SERVICES~~are expected to disclose personal interests that may conflict with ours and they may not engage in personal activities that conflict with their responsibilities and obligations to us. Periodically, we inquire as to whether or not any of our Directors have entered into any transactions, arrangements or relationships that constitute related party transactions. If any actual or potential conflict of interest is reported, our entire Board and outside legal counsel review the transaction and relationship disclosed and the Board makes a formal determination regarding each Director's independence. If the transaction is deemed to present a conflict of interest, the Board will determine the appropriate action to be taken.

Sam Kan & Company (Sam Kan) currently serves as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. To the knowledge of management, neither such firm nor any of its members has any direct or material indirect financial interest in us or any connection Transactions with usRelated ~~in any capacity otherwise than as independent accountants.~~Persons

~~Our~~ The Board is responsible for review, inapproval, ~~its~~or ~~discretion~~ratification of "related-person transactions" involving International Industrial Enterprises, ~~may~~Inc. ~~direct~~or ~~the~~its ~~appointment~~subsidiaries ofand ~~different~~related ~~public~~persons. ~~accountants~~Under atSEC ~~any~~rules ~~time~~(Section ~~during~~404 ~~the~~(a) ~~year,~~of ifRegulation ~~the~~S-K), ~~Board~~a ~~believes~~related person ~~that~~is a ~~change~~director, ~~would~~officer, benominee infor ~~the~~director, ~~best~~or ~~interests~~5% stockholder of the ~~stockholders. The~~company ~~Board~~since ~~has~~the ~~considered~~beginning of the ~~audit~~previous ~~fees~~fiscal year, ~~audit-related~~and ~~fees,~~their ~~tax~~immediate ~~fees~~family ~~and~~members. ~~other~~International ~~fees~~Industrial ~~paid~~Enterprises, toInc. ~~Peterson~~is ~~Sullivan,~~required asto ~~disclosed~~report ~~below,~~any ~~and~~transaction ~~has~~or series ~~determined~~of ~~that~~transactions in which the ~~payment~~company ofor ~~such~~a ~~fees~~subsidiary is ~~compatible~~a ~~with~~participant, ~~maintaining~~ the ~~independence~~amount ofinvolved ~~the~~exceeds ~~accountants~~$120,000, and a related person has a direct or indirect material interest.

~~PRINCIPAL~~The Board ~~ACCOUNTING~~has ~~FEES~~determined ~~AND~~that, ~~SERVICES~~barring additional facts or circumstances, a related person does not have a direct or indirect material interest in the following categories of transactions:

~~The~~● ~~following~~any ~~table~~transaction ~~presents~~with ~~aggregate~~another ~~fees~~company for ~~professional~~which ~~services~~a ~~rendered~~related person's only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), director, or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company's shares, if the amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that company's total annual revenue; ● compensation to executive officers determined by ~~Sam~~the ~~Kan~~Board; ~~during~~● compensation to directors determined by the ~~years~~Board; ~~ended~~● ~~December~~transactions ~~31,~~in ~~2012~~which all security holders receive proportional benefits; and ~~2011:~~● banking-related services involving a bank depository of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture, or similar service.

	Year Ended
	December 31,
	2012		2011
Audit fees	$	4,100	$	2,500
Audit-related fees		-		-
Tax fees		-		-
Total fees	$	4,100	$	2,500

~~Audit~~There were ~~Fees~~no related party transacitons pursuant to the above during the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013. For related party transactions that do not exceed $120,000 please see “Note D - Related Party Transactions” in the consolidated notes to the financial statements included in this Form 10-K.

~~Audit fees for the years ended December 31~~Review, Approval ~~2012~~or ~~and~~Ratification ~~2011, totaled $4,100 and $2,500 and consist~~ of ~~the~~Transactions ~~aggregate~~with ~~fees~~Related billed by Sam Kan for the audit of the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and review of interim financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.Persons

~~Audit-Related~~Our unwritten ~~Fees~~policy with regard to transactions with related persons is that all material transactions are to be reviewed by the entire Board for any possible conflicts of interest. In the event of a potential conflict of interest, the Board will generally evaluate the transaction in terms of the following standards: (i) the benefits to us; (ii) the impact on a director’s independence in the event the related person is a director, an immediate family member of a director or an entity in which a director is a partner, shareholder or executive officer; (iii) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (iv) the terms and conditions of the transaction; and (v) the terms available to unrelated parties or the employees generally. The Board will then document its findings and conclusion in written minutes.

There were no fees billed by Sam Kan & Company for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2010, respectively.14

~~Tax~~ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ~~Fees~~ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

~~The~~KLJ & ~~aggregate~~Associates, ~~fees~~LLP ~~billed~~("KLJ") bycurrently ~~Sam~~serves ~~Kan~~as &our ~~Company~~independent ~~for~~registered ~~professional~~public ~~services~~accounting firm to audit our financial statements for ~~tax~~the ~~compliance,~~fiscal ~~tax~~year ~~advice~~ended December 31, ~~and~~2014. ~~tax~~KLJ ~~planning~~replaced ~~were~~Sam $0Kan ~~and~~& $0Company ~~for~~beginning with the ~~fiscal~~review ~~years~~of ~~ended~~our ~~December 31~~June 30, ~~2012~~2013 ~~and~~10-Q. ~~2011~~To the knowledge of management, ~~respectively.~~neither ~~The~~such ~~Company~~firm ~~paid~~nor ~~fees~~any ~~totaling~~of ~~$1,175~~its tomembers ahas ~~third~~any ~~party~~direct or material indirect financial interest in ~~2012~~us ~~for~~or ~~tax~~any ~~preparation~~connection ~~services~~with us in any capacity otherwise than as independent accountants.

~~All~~Our Board, ~~Other~~in ~~Fees~~its discretion, may direct the appointment of different public accountants at any time during the year, if the Board believes that a change would be in the best interests of the stockholders. The Board has considered the audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees paid to KLJ and Sam Kan & Company, as disclosed below, and has determined that the payment of such fees is compatible with maintaining the independence of the accountants.

~~There~~PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING ~~were~~FEES noAND ~~other fees billed by Sam Kan for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.~~SERVICES

~~Pre-Approval~~The following ~~Policy~~table presents aggregate fees for professional services rendered by KLJ and Sam Kan during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

The Board of Directors has established policies and procedures for the approval and pre approval of audit services and permitted non-audit services. The Board has the responsibility to engage and terminate the Company's independent registered public accountants, to pre-approve their performance of audit services and permitted non-audit services and to review with the Company's independent registered public accountants their fees and plans for all auditing services. All services provided by and fees paid to Sam Kam were pre-approved by the Board of Directors.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014		2013
Audit fees	$	4,800	$	4,550
Audit-related fees		-		-
Tax fees		-		-
Total	$	4,800	$	4,550

24Audit Fees

~~PART~~Audit fees IVfor the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, totaled $4,800 and $4,550 and consist of the aggregate fees billed by KLJ and Sam Kan & Company for the audit of the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and review of interim financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

~~ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.~~Audit-Related Fees

There were no fees billed by our auditors for assurance and related services that are noreasonably ~~reports~~related onto ~~Form~~the ~~8-K~~performance ~~incorporated~~of ~~herein~~the byaudit or ~~reference~~review of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

~~The following documents are filed as a part of this Form 10-K:~~Tax Fees

1.The aggregate ~~Financial~~fees ~~Statements~~billed by our auditors for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

~~The~~All Other ~~following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K:~~Fees

●There were ~~Report~~no ofother ~~Independent~~fees ~~Registered~~billed ~~Public~~by ~~Accounting~~our ~~Firm~~auditors ~~● Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 ● Consolidated Statements of Operations~~ for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2014 ~~and~~or 2011, and the cumulative period from Inception (May 5, 1998) to December 31, 2012 ● Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) from May 5, 1998 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 ● Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the cumulative period from Inception (May 5, 1998) to December 31, 2012 ● Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements2013.

~~2. Exhibits~~Pre-Approval Policy

The Board ~~exhibits~~of ~~listed~~Directors inhas established policies and procedures for the ~~Exhibit~~approval ~~Index,~~and ~~which~~pre ~~appears~~approval ~~immediately~~of ~~following~~audit services and permitted non-audit services. The Board has the ~~signature~~responsibility ~~page,~~to ~~are~~engage ~~incorporated~~and ~~herein~~terminate bythe ~~reference~~Company's independent registered public accountants, to pre-approve their performance of audit services and ~~are~~permitted ~~filed~~non-audit asservices ~~part~~and ofto ~~this~~review ~~Form~~with 10the Company's independent registered public accountants their fees and plans for all auditing services. All services provided by and fees paid to Sam Kam were pre-Kapproved by the Board of Directors.

~~3. Financial Statement Schedules~~15

Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes described in Item 15(a)(1) above.PART IV

25ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

~~SIGNATURES~~There are no reports on Form 8-K incorporated herein by reference.

InThe following ~~accordance~~documents ~~with~~are ~~Section~~filed 13as ora ~~15(d)~~part of ~~the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused~~ this ~~report~~Form ~~to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~10-K:

	International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.
	(Registrant)
Date: January 31, 2012	By:	/s/ David W. Rodgers
		David W. Rodgers Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)

1. Financial Statements

InThe ~~accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the~~ following ~~persons~~financial statements onare ~~behalf~~included ~~of the registrant and~~ in ~~the~~Part ~~capacities~~II, ~~and~~Item on8 ~~the~~of ~~dates~~this ~~indicated.~~Form 10-K:

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ David W. Rodgers	Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director	January 31, 2012
	(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)

	●	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
	●	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
	●	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
	●	Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
	●	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
	●	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

262. Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index, which appears immediately following the signature page, are incorporated herein by reference, and are filed as part of this Form 10-K.

~~Exhibit No~~3. Financial ~~Description~~Statement ~~of Exhibit~~Schedules

~~31.1~~Financial statement ~~Certification~~schedules ofare ~~Principal~~omitted ~~Executive~~because ~~Officer~~they ~~and~~are ~~Principal~~not ~~Financial~~required ~~Officer~~or ~~Pursuant~~are tonot ~~Rule~~applicable, ~~13a-14~~or of the ~~Securities~~required ~~Exchange~~information ~~Act~~is ofprovided ~~1934,~~in the Asconsolidated ~~Adopted~~financial ~~Pursuant~~statements toor ~~Section~~notes ~~302~~described ofin ~~the~~Item 15(a)(1) ~~Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~above.

~~32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~16

27SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	International Industrial Enterprises, Inc.
	(Registrant)

Date: March 13, 2015	By:	*/s/ David W. Rodgers*
	David W. Rodgers Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ David W. Rodgers	Chief Executive Officer, Chief	March 13, 2015
David W. Rodgers	Financial Officer and Director
	(Principal Executive Officer,
	Principal Financial Officer, and
	Principal Accounting Officer)

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Filing Compare · INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES, INC.