UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

———————

FORM 10-Q

———————


ü	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
	ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2008
or

	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
	ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-29331

———————

IELEMENT CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

———————


Nevada	76-0270295
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

P.O. Box 279, Lyndeborough, New Hampshire 03082

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

(603) 654-2488

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

———————


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.			ü	Yes		No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer		Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer	(Do not check if a smaller	Smaller reporting company			ü
	reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
			ü	Yes		No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. As of November 17, 2008, there were 33,149,501 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by
a court.				Yes		No

IELEMENT CORPORATION

For The Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Operation

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 5. Other Information

Item 6. Exhibits

THIS REPORT CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE BASED ON CURRENT EXPECTATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS ABOUT THE COMPANY AND ITS INDUSTRY. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS, LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE, ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM THOSE EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE COMPANY UNDERTAKES NO OBLIGATION TO UPDATE PUBLICLY ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS FOR ANY REASON EVEN IF NEW INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE OR OTHER EVENTS OCCUR IN THE FUTURE.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

IELEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007

IELEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

INDEX TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

PAGE

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and March 31, 2008 (Audited)

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Operations For The Six And Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 And 2007

Condensed Consolidated Statements Of Cash Flows For The Six Months Ended September 30, 2008 And 2007

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

IELEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	September 30,			March 31,
	2008			2008
ASSETS	(Unaudited)			(Audited)

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12		$	3,609
Investments		––			153,125

TOTAL ASSETS	$	12		$	156,734

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)


CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Current portion - notes payable	$	1,158,004		$	1,109,569
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		110,706			51,578

Total current liabilities		1,268,710			1,161,147

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Notes payable, net of current portion		102,000			120,528

Total long-term liabilities		102,000			120,528

Total Liabilities		1,370,710			1,281,675

STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, $.001 Par Value, 12,500,000 and 200,000,000 shares authorized
at . 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively; -0- shares issued and outstanding
at September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively.		––			––
Common stock, $.001 Par Value, 125,000,000 and 125,000,000 shares authorized
at September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 respectively; 33,149,501 and 27,799,501 shares
issues and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 , respectively.		33,150			27,800
Additional paid-in capital		5,168,595			5,075,028
Additional paid-in capital - warrants		177,757			177,757
Accumulated deficit		(6,750,200	)		(6,405,526	)

Total Stockholders' (Deficit)		(1,370,698	)		(1,124,941	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)	$	12		$	156,734

IELEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS – UNAUDITED
FOR THE SIX AND THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007


	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
				(Reclassified)						(Reclassified)
	September 30,			September 30,			September 30,			September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
OPERATING REVENUE:
Income from continuing operations	$	––		$	––		$	––		$	––

OPERATING EXPENSES
General and administrative		237,576			––			73,333			––

Total Operating Expenses		237,576			––			73,333			––

(LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(237,576	)		––			(73,333	)		––

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Gain (Loss) on short-term investment		(51,871	)		––			––			––
Loss on notes and subscriptions receivable					––			––
Gain on write - off of accounts payable		809						––
Interest income					––			––
Interest expense		(56,036	)		––			(30,000	)		––

Total Other Income (Expense)		(107,098	)		––			(30,000	)		––

(LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(344,674	)		––			(103,333	)		––

Provision for Income Taxes		––			––			––			––

(LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(344,674	)		––			(103,333	)		––

(LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Loss) from discontinued operations		––			(1,956,108	)		––			(1,341,286	)

NET (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES	$	(344,674	)	$	(1,956,108	)	$	(103,333	)	$	(1,341,286	)

NET (LOSS) PER BASIC AND DILUTED COMMON SHARES
Continuing operations: basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	––		$	––		$	––

Discontinued operations: basic and diluted	$	––		$	(0.01	)	$	––		$	––

TOTAL NET (LOSS) PER BASIC AND DILUTED COMMON SHARES	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	––		$	––

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON
SHARES OUTSTANDING		31,716,987			260,049,439			33,149,501			284,144,557

IELEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – UNAUDITED
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007


	September 30,			September 30,
	2008			2007
				(Reclassified)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (loss) from continuing operations	$	(344,674	)	$	––

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
(used in) operating activities:
Stock issued for consulting		53,500			––
Stock based employee compensation		45,417			––
Loss on short-term investment		48,000

Changes in assets and liabilities
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses payable		89,035			––

Net cash (used in) operating activities of continuing operations		(108,722	)		––

Net loss from discontinued operations		––			(1,956,108	)
Net effect on cash flow from discontinued operations		––			417,925

Total cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations		––			(1,538,183	)

Total cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(108,722	)		(1,538,183	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash received from sale of marketable securities		105,125			––

Total cash provided by (used in) investing activities from continuing operations		105,125			––

Adjustments to reconcile total cash provided by investing activities
from discontinued operations		––			(61,395	)

Total cash provided by (used in) investing activities		105,125			(61,395	)

IELEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED (CONTINUED)
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007


	September 30,			September 30,
	2008			2007
				(Reclassified)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITES

Total cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations		––			––

Adjustments to reconcile total cash provided by financing activities
from discontinued operations		––			1,524,782

Total cash provided by financing activities		––			1,524,782

NET (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(3,597	)		(74,796	)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -
BEGINNING OF YEAR - CONTINUING OPERATIONS		3,609			––

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -
BEGINNING OF YEAR - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		––			165,352

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF PERIOD -
CONTINUING OPERATIONS	$	12		$	90,556

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:

CASH PAID DURING THE YEAR FOR:
Interest expense	$	56,036		$	––

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH
ACTIVITIES:

Prepaid consulting	$	23,333		$	––

Stock issued for services	$	53,500		$	––

Stock based compensation	$	45,417		$	––

IELEMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1- ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by IElement Corporation and Subsidiary (the “Company”) without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted as allowed by such rules and regulations, and the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the March 31, 2007 audited financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto. While management believes the procedures followed in preparing these condensed financial statements are reasonable, the accuracy of the amounts are in some respects dependent upon the facts that will exist, and procedures that will be accomplished by the Company later in the year.

The management of the Company believes that the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

MK Secure Solutions Ltd. was established as a messaging security and Management company. On March 25, 2004, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, Global Diversified Acquisition Corp. ("GDAC"), acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of MK Secure Solutions Ltd ("MKSS"), a holding company incorporated on March 11, 2003, under the laws of the British Virgin Islands. The transaction was effected by the issuance of shares such that the former MKSS shareholders owned approximately 90% of the outstanding MailKey stock after the transaction. GDAC then changed its name to MailKey Corporation ("MailKey").

The Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer resigned in September 2004 and the Company's Chief Financial Officer and member of the Board resigned in November 2004. Both positions were filled by the Company's founder and deputy chairman.

In the first quarter of 2005 the Company was unable to continue funding the development of its messaging security solutions, and the rights were transferred to the development team in return for the cancellation of most of the liabilities which the Company owed to them. The Company retains an interest of 20% in the messaging security solutions; however to date there has been no commercialization of the solutions. In the first quarter 2005 the Company sold its insolvent British Virgin Islands subsidiary, MK Secure Solutions Limited, for $1 to a UK based accounting firm, SS Khehar & Company. SS Khehar & Company has agreed to deal with the winding up of the former subsidiary for a fee of $1,800.

On November 9, 2004, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") by and among the MailKey Corporation, MailKey Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary ("Merger Sub"), Inc., a Nevada Corporation, IElement, Inc. ("IElement") and Ivan Zweig, pursuant to which the Company agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of IElement. This transaction closed in January 2005. At the closing of the Merger, Merger Sub was merged into IElement, at which time the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub ceased and IElement now continues as the surviving company. The Share Exchange has been accounted for as a reverse merger under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, IElement will be treated as the continuing entity for accounting purposes and the historical financial statements presented will be those of IElement.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, MailKey issued its common stock, $.001 par value per share, in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of IElement. The exchange ratio setting forth the number of shares of MailKey common stock issued for each issued and outstanding share of capital stock of IElement was 3.52 shares of MailKey common stock for each issued and outstanding share of capital stock of IElement.

IElement, incorporated in Nevada on December 30, 2002, was a facilities-based nationwide communications service provider that provides state-of-the-art telecommunications services to small and medium sized businesses ("SMBs"). IElement provides broadband data, voice and wireless services by offering integrated T-1 lines as well as Layer 2 Private Network solutions that provide SMBs with dedicated Internet access services, customizable business solutions for voice, data, wireless and Internet, and secure communications channels between the SMB offices, partners, vendors, customers and employees without the use of a firewall or encryption devices. IElement has a network presence in 18 major markets in the United States, including facilities in Los Angeles, Dallas and Chicago. The Company started business in 2003.

In connection with the closing of the merger, MailKey entered into a letter of intent with Ivan Zweig and Kramerica Capital Corporation ("Kramerica"), a corporation wholly-owned by Mr. Zweig, which stipulates that MailKey and IElement enter into a four year employment agreement with Kramerica and Mr. Zweig pursuant to which Mr. Zweig will serve as the Chief Executive Officer of MailKey and IElement. The letter of intent provides that Mr. Zweig will receive an annual base salary of $300,000. In addition to his base salary, Mr. Zweig will be entitled to annual performance bonuses with targets ranging from $1,000,000 to $3,000,000 during the second, third and fourth years provided IElement achieves certain performance goals. If Mr. Zweig is terminated without cause,

NOTE 1- ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION – (CONTINUED)

MailKey is obligated to pay the remaining salary owed to Mr. Zweig for the complete term of the employment agreement, to pay off all notes owed to Mr. Zweig or Kramerica, all outstanding options shall become fully vested, MailKey shall pay all earned performance bonuses and all accrued vacation. If Mr. Zweig is terminated for any reason other than cause, MailKey shall pay in full the notes owed to either Mr. Zweig or Kramerica Capital Corporation and at least 75% of the earned bonus plan set forth by the directors.

Effective January 24, 2005, Mr. Zweig was also appointed to the Board of Directors of MailKey. Ivan Zweig has served as the Chief Executive Officer of IElement since March 2003. Mr. Zweig is also the Chief Executive Officer, director and sole shareholder of Kramerica, a personnel services corporation. Since December 1998, Mr. Zweig has served as the Chief Executive Officer and director of Integrated Communications Consultants Corp. ("ICCC"), a nationwide data carrier specializing in high speed Internet access and secure data transaction. ICCC provides IElement with resold telecom services and IElement pays ICCC approximately $80,000 on a monthly basis for such services. On October 1, 2004, ICCC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. On January 19, 2005, upon the consummation of the acquisition, IElement issued eight (8) promissory notes to, Kramerica, certain members of Mr. Zweig's immediate family and others in the aggregate amount of $376,956 (the "Notes") with no interest. Upon issuance, the Notes were payable in 36 monthly installments with the first payment commencing six months after the closing of the merger and were secured by substantially all of the assets of IElement. IElement did not make any payments on the Notes. On March 25, 2006 each of the Notes were cancelled and IElement issued new convertible promissory notes to the same individuals in the same principal amount of $376,956, again with no interest thereon. The first payment on each of the new convertible promissory notes was due in September 2006 with a total of 36 monthly installments through August 2009. The Lender has the right to convert all or a portion of the outstanding balance, at any time until the notes are paid in full, into IElement's common stock at a conversion price of $0.035 per share. Any past due balance on the old Notes was forgiven at the time of cancellation of the old Notes and issuance of the new convertible promissory notes. The new convertible promissory notes were secured by substantially all the assets of IElement, as were the original Notes. The aggregate of the Kramerica notes is $120,000 and was issued for services rendered prior to issuance. The $50,000 note was originally issued on June 1, 2004 for services prior to that date and was restated subsequent to the merger on January 19, 2005. The remaining $70,000 note was issued on January 19, 2005 for services rendered prior to that date. On October 2, 2006, all eight holders of the promissory notes to Mr. Zweig’s immediate family extended the payment terms so that the first of the 36 monthly payments is now due on April 1, 2007 and the last is due on March 1, 2010. No principle payments have been made on any of the notes and no interest is currently accruing.

The Company's condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been presented on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

The Company received consent to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized to be issued from 100,000,000 shares to 2,000,000,000 shares, and consented to the authorization of 200,000,000 shares of Blank Check Preferred Stock. There are no current plans to designate any Blank Check Preferred Stock.

On August 1, 2005, the Company filed an Information Statement in the definitive form on schedule 14C with the SEC to change its name from MailKey Corporation to IElement Corporation. Concurrent with this name change, the Company received a new stock trading symbol (IELM.OB) on the NASD Over-the-Counter Electronic Bulletin Board.

On August 8, 2005, Tim Dean-Smith and Susan Walton resigned their positions on the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company. Tim Dean-Smith also resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. The resignations of Mr. Dean-Smith and Ms. Walton were consistent with the expectations of the parties pursuant to the consummation of the merger between IElement and the Company on January 19, 2005, and do not arise from any disagreement on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices, nor regarding the general direction of the Company. Neither Mr. Dean-Smith nor Ms. Walton served on any subcommittees of the Board. Ivan Zweig, the current Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer was appointed as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company until a new Chief Financial Officer is found.

In March 2006, Ivan Zweig, as the only Director, appointed Lance Stovall and Ken Willey to the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting, when all three Directors were up for re-election.

On December 6, 2006 the Board of Directors unanimously appointed Charles Carlson to the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting after the annual meeting scheduled for December 15, 2006.

On December 15, 2006, Ivan Zweig, Lance Stovall and Ken Willey were re-elected to the Board of Directors at the Company’s annual meeting. Charles Carlson also continued to serve on the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting but was not up for re-election at this time.

NOTE 1- ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION – (CONTINUED)

On June 19, 2007, we reached agreement with the eight Note holders to extend the payment terms so that the first of 36 monthly payments on each of the notes was due on April 1, 2008. Four of the eight Note holders received on June 19, 2007 a total of 5,400,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for extension of the principle repayment terms. On January 23, 2008 six of the eight Notes were converted into 3,173,612 shares of our common stock. The total aggregate principle balance of the remaining two notes as of March 31, 2008 was $173,845.

On June 27, 2007 Ken Willey resigned from his position on the Board of Directors. His resignation did not arise from any disagreement on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices, nor regarding the general direction of the Company.

On August 7, 2007 the Board of Directors unanimously appointed Art Eckert to the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting. On September 13, 2007 the Board removed Art Eckert from the Board. Mr. Eckert was removed as a result of the termination of negotiations with Micro Data Systems regarding a potential merger transaction. Mr. Eckert was previously appointed to the Board of Directors as an advisor to Micro Data Systems and to assist in the due diligence process.

On December 20, 2007 the Company sold its main operating subsidiary, I-Element, Inc., along with certain assets and liabilities related to the that telecommunications business, to Ivan Zweig. In conjunction with this transaction, Mr. Zweig released the Company from any and all liability under his employment agreement as well as the consulting agreement with Kramerica Capital Corporation, both dated January 1, 2007, and resigned all officer and director positions he held with the Company. In addition, Mr. Zweig agreed to cancel all of his outstanding warrants and options to purchase the Company’s stock. Mr. Zweig and I-Element, Inc. also agreed to indemnify the Company from liabilities arising prior to December 20, 2007.

On December 20, 2007, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Newsgrade Corporation (“Newsgrade”), pursuant to which we agreed to purchase from Newsgrade one (1) million shares of common stock of The Retirement Solutions.com, Inc. (“TRS”). As consideration for the purchase, we agreed to pay to Newsgrade at closing $200,000 in the form of a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Convertible Note”) due and payable one year from issuance with 10% interest and convertible into shares of our common stock.

On December 20, 2007 and December 24, 2007, our Board of the Directors appointed Susan Pursel and Paul Lengemann to the Board of Directors, respectively. Also effective December 20, 2007 Susan Pursel was appointed as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer. That same day, Lance Stovall resigned from the Board of Directors.

Susan Pursel and Paul Lengemann are currently our sole officers and directors. Ms. Pursel and Mr. Lengemann shall serve until the next annual meeting. Ms. Pursel is a minority stockholder of Newsgrade and former President of StockDataNews.com, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Newsgrade. Mr. Lengemann was President of Stockdiagnostics.com, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Newsgrade between 2002 and 2004.

On December 27, 2007 the Board of Directors approved a reverse stock split whereby each 16 shares of its old common stock was exchanged for one new share of its common stock. The split took effect on January 11, 2008 and the stock symbol was changed from IELM to IELE at that time.

NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the financial position and results of IElement. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassification of Accounts in the Financial Statements

On December 20, 2007 the Company sold its main operating subsidiary, I-Element, Inc., along with certain assets and liabilities related to that telecommunications business. The condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended September 30, 2008 reflect the reclassification of these operations to below the line as discontinued operations in accordance with the provisions of FASB 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets”.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (CONTINUED)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash or cash equivalents.

The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with a financial institution which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. At various times throughout the year the Company had amounts on deposit at the financial institution in excess of federally insured limits.

The cash and cash equivalents balance as of September 30, 2008 consisted of $12 in cash and $ -0- in marketable securities.

Revenue and Cost Recognition

The Company records its transactions under the accrual method of accounting whereby income is recognized when the services are provided rather than when billed or the fees are collected, and costs and expenses are recognized in the period they are incurred rather than paid for. In determining when to recognize revenue the Company relies on Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13. The Company uses four criteria in determining when revenue is realized or realizable and earned. First, the Company must have persuasive evidence of the existing of an arrangement. The Company utilizes written contracts with its customers to meet this criterion. Second, delivery must have occurred or services must have been rendered. The Company defers revenue from the date invoiced, usually 35-40 days before services are rendered, to the month services are deemed completely rendered, thereby satisfying this criterion. Third, the price must be fixed and determinable. The Company delivers invoices to every customer stating the exact amount due for services, thereby satisfying this criterion. Fourth, the company determines credibility of its customers and collectibility of its invoices by evaluating its ongoing history and relationship with each customer, the fact that each customer is dependant upon the Company to provide its telephone and internet services and, in many cases, the fact that the customer has a security or service deposit with the Company in the amount of one month's service charges. When the Company cannot determine that a particular customer is credible and a particular invoice is collectible, the company will not record this invoice as revenue until the payment is collected from that customer. Thus, the Company meets the fourth criterion that collectibility be reasonably assured.

For the six months ended September 30, 2008, the Company did not have any revenues.

Accounts Receivable

The Company factored 99% of its billings with an outside agency. The Company invoiced its customers on the 28^th of the month for services to be rendered approximately 35 days subsequent to the billing date. The Company received 75% of the aggregate net face value of the assigned accounts at the time of placement with the factor. On December 20, 2007 the Company ceased factoring its receivables. All outstanding accounts receivable were sold at that time as part of the sale of the Company’s subsidiary, I-Element, Inc.

Deferred Revenue

Deferred revenue consists of customers billed in advance of revenue being earned.

Provision for Bad Debt

Under SOP 01-6 “Accounting for Certain Entities (including Entities with Trade Receivables)”, the Company has intent and belief that all amounts in accounts receivable are collectible. The Company has determined that based on their collections an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0 and $0 has been recorded September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Bad debt expense for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $ -0- and $7,993, respectively.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses the costs associated with advertising and marketing as incurred. There were no advertising and marketing expenses included in the statements of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

Income Taxes

The income tax benefit is computed on the pretax loss based on the current tax law. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates. No benefit is reflected for the six months ended September 30, 2008 or 2007.

NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (CONTINUED)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount reported on the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying amount reported for notes payable approximates fair value because, in general, the interest on the underlying instruments fluctuates with market rates.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.


Furniture and equipment	5 Years
Telecommunications equipment	5 Years

When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income for the period. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to income as incurred; significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. Deduction is made for retirements resulting from renewals or betterments.

Income (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

Historical net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common stock equivalents were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reported a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented.

The following is a reconciliation of the computation for basic and diluted EPS:


	September 30,			September 30,
	2008			2007
Net Income (Loss)	$	(344,674	)	$	(1,956,108	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding
(Basic)		31,716,987			260,049,439

Weighted average common stock equivalents		––			––

Stock options		––			––

Warrants		––			––

Weighted average common shares outstanding
(Diluted)		31,716,987			260,049,439

There were no options issued during the six months ended September 30, 2008. A total of 1,212,393 options and warrants were outstanding as of September 30, 2008. Including the options and warrants outstanding for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 would have been anti-dilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payments," which establishes the accounting for employee stock-based awards. Under the provisions of SFAS No.123(R), stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite employee service period (generally the vesting period of the grant). The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method and, as a result, periods prior to March 31, 2006 have not been restated. The Company recognized stock-based compensation for awards issued under the Company's stock option plans in other income/expenses included in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Additionally, no modifications were made to outstanding stock options prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), and no cumulative adjustments were recorded in the Company's financial statements.

The Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee stock-based compensation under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”.

NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (CONTINUED)

Stock-Based Compensation – (Continued)

The fair value of the option issued is used to measure the transaction, as this is more reliable than the fair value of the services received. The fair value is measured at the value of the Company’s common stock on the date that the commitment for performance by the counterparty has been reached or the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital.

SFAS No. 123(R) requires disclosure of pro-forma information for periods prior to adoption. The pro-forma disclosures are based on the fair value of awards at the grant date, amortized to expense over the service period. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, for the period prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), and the actual effect on net income and earning per share for the period after the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).

Stock-based compensation for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $45,416 and $47,156, respectively

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 replaces Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is impracticable. APB No. 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle in net income in the period of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.” SFAS No. 155 resolves issues addressed in SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, “Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets,” and permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of SFAS No. 155 will have on its financial position or results of operations.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” SFAS No. 156 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract under a transfer of the servicer’s financial assets that meets the requirements for sale accounting, a transfer of the servicer’s financial assets to a qualified special-purpose entity in a guaranteed mortgage securitization in which the transferor retains all of the resulting securities and classifies them as either available-for-sale or trading securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and an acquisition or assumption of an obligation to service a financial asset that does not relate to financial assets of the servicer or its consolidated affiliates. Additionally, SFAS No. 156 requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, permits an entity to choose either the use of an amortization or fair value method for subsequent measurements, permits at initial adoption a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights and requires separate presentation of servicing assets and liabilities subsequently measured at fair value and additional disclosures for all separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective for transactions entered into after the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of SFAS No. 156 will have on its financial position or results of operations.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – (CONTINUED)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – (Continued)

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“FAS 157”). This Standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of FAS 157 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The FASB also issued in September 2006 Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), (“FAS 158”). This Standard requires recognition of the funded status of a benefit plan in the statement of financial position. The Standard also requires recognition in other comprehensive income certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules, as well as modifies the timing of reporting and adds certain disclosures. FAS 158 provides recognition and disclosure elements to be effective as of the end of the fiscal year after December 15, 2006 and measurement elements to be effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The Company has not yet analyzed the impact FAS 158 will have on its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of SFAS No. 115 (“SFAS No. 159”), which provides all entities, including not-for-profit organizations, with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply the complex provisions of hedge accounting. Certain specified items are eligible for the irrevocable fair value measurement option as established by SFAS No. 159. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of the Company’s year beginning after January 1, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 159 on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“FAS No. 160”). FAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. FAS No. 160 is effective for the Company in its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. The Company does not believe this statement will have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations upon adoption.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 R “Business Combinations” (“FAS No. 141R”). FAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. FAS No. 141R also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. FAS No. 141R is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. The Company does not believe this statement will have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations upon adoption.

NOTE 3- FIXED ASSETS

Property and equipment as of September 30, 2008 was as follows:


	September 30,		March 31,
	2008		2008
Property and equipment	$	––	$	––
Less: accumulated depreciation		––		––

Net book value	$	––	$	––

NOTE 4- NOTES PAYABLE

The Company has 17 notes payable at September 30, 2008 in the aggregate principal and interest amount of $1,260,004 owed to 7 note holders. As of September 30, 2008 we were current in all obligations except for past due total payments of $467,231 on 10 notes. No default has been declared. The following is a more detailed discussion of the 17 notes.

On January 19, 2005, IElement issued eight (8) promissory notes to Kramerica and certain members of Mr. Zweig's immediate family and others in the aggregate amount of $376,956 (the "Notes") with no interest. In particular, the Notes are payable to Heather Walther ($20,000), Kramerica, Inc. (aggregate of $120,000), Mary Francis Strait Trust ($55,611), Peter Walther ($30,000), Richard Zweig ($20,000), Richard Zweig IRA ($27,500) and Strait Grandchildren Trust ($103,845). Upon issuance, the Notes were payable in 36 monthly installments with the first payment commencing six months after the closing of the merger and were secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. We did not make any payments on the Notes.

On March 25, 2006 each of the eight (8) Notes were cancelled and we issued new convertible promissory notes to the same individuals in the same principal amount of $376,956, again with no interest thereon. The first payment on each of the new convertible promissory Notes was due in September 2006 with a total of 36 monthly installments through August 2009. The Lender has the right to convert all or a portion of the outstanding balance, at any time until the Notes are paid in full, into share of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.035 per share. Any past due balance on the old Notes was forgiven at the time of cancellation of the old notes and issuance of the new convertible promissory Notes.

On October 6, 2006 we reached agreements with the holders of these eight Notes to extend the first payment date until April 1, 2007. We did not make any payments on the notes.

Four of the eight Note holders received a total of 5,400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on June 19, 2007 in exchange for extension of the principle repayment terms. This amount was recorded as interest expense. On January 23, 2008 six of the eight Notes were converted into 3,173,612 shares of our common stock. The total aggregate principle balance of the remaining two notes as of September 30, 2008 was $173,845.

In January 2008, six of these Notes were sold by the note holder. In particular, the $50,000 note to Kramerica, the $55,611 note to Mary Francis Straight, the $20,000 note to Heather Walther, the $30,000 note to Peter Walther, the $20,000 note to Richard Zweig and the $27,500 note to Richard Zweig IRA were sold to third parties. On January 23, 2008, we converted the six notes to 3,173,612 shares of the Company’s common stock. The two remaining notes are the $70,000 note to Kramerica and the $103,845 note to Straight Grandchildren Trust. Both of these notes are now owned by Kramerica.

In addition to these notes, the Company also has another promissory note payable to Kramerica in the principle amount of $25,000. This note was issued on August 24, 2006 and bears interest at an annual rate of ten percent. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $29,025.

On August 8, 2005, IElement issued four promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $183,097 to Timothy Dean Smith ($53,930), Susan Walton ($30,000), Jeremy Dean Smith ($54,603) and Dolphin Capital ($44,564), with no interest. Upon issuance the notes were payable in 36 monthly installments with the first payment due in February, 2006. We did not make any payments on these notes.

On March 25, 2006 each of the four notes were cancelled and IElement issued new convertible promissory notes to the same individuals in the same principal amount of $183,097, again with no interest thereon. The first payment on each of the new convertible promissory notes was due in September 2006 with a total of 36 monthly installments through August 2009. The Lenders had the right to convert all or a portion of the outstanding balance, at any time until the notes were paid in full, into IElement's common stock at a conversion price of $0.035 per share. Any past due balance on the old notes was forgiven at the time of cancellation of the old notes and issuance of the new convertible promissory notes. These four notes were each converted to common stock at a price of $0.035 per share on November 13, 2006.

One of the remaining notes is held by Duane Morris in the principle amount of $34,631. The Duane Morris note was issued in exchange for a settlement of disputed attorneys fees on August 16, 2005 and was originally agreed to be paid in nine monthly installments beginning on September 30, 2005 and ending May 30, 2006. As of September 30, 2008 we are past due on our payments on the Duane Morris note but intend to resume payments in the coming months. This note bears no interest.

On June 8, 2006 we issued a note payable in the amount of $100,000 to Rhino Limited which bears a ten percent interest rate. It matured when we secured funding from exercise of outstanding warrants. Those warrants expired unexercised on December 30, 2007. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $121,244.

On June 19, 2006 we issued a note payable in the amount of $20,000 to Veronica Kristi Prenn. It bore a ten percent interest rate and matured on December 19, 2006. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of December 31, 2007 was $23,096. On January 17, 2008 this note was converted to shares of the Company’s common stock.

NOTE 4- NOTES PAYABLE – (CONTINUED)

On August 4, 2006 we issued a note payable to Walton Hansen in the amount of $24,808. It bore a ten percent interest rate and matured when we secured funding from exercise of outstanding warrants. On October 9, 2007, this note was converted into shares of our common stock.

On September 5, 2006 we issued a note payable to William Goatley in the amount of $60,000. It bore a ten percent interest rate and matured on December 5, 2006. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of December 31, 2007 was $67,972. On January 17, 2008 this note was converted into shares of our common stock.

On March 16, 2007 we issued a note payable to Michael Bloch in the amount of $110,000. It bears a ten percent interest rate and matured on June 16, 2007. On July 20, 2007 the maturity on this note was extended to October 31, 2007 in exchange for 62,500 shares of the Company’s common stock. On October 31, 2007 the maturity on this note was extended to November 30, 2007 in exchange for $1,500. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $113,727. This note is secured by substantially all of our assets. We are currently renegotiating the terms of this note.

On May 18, 2007 we issued a note payable to Secure Acquisition Financial Entity L.P. (SAFE) in the amount of $200,000 in exchange for $200,000 cash and a note receivable from Micro-Data Systems, Inc. in the amount of $50,000. The note payable bears an 18 percent annual interest rate and the note receivable bears a 20 percent annual interest rate. The note was assumed by GDBC, Inc. on January 31, 2008. The current principle and interest balance on this note payable as of September 30, 2008 was $232,343. We are currently renegotiating the terms of this note.

During July of 2007 we issued 10 notes payable to various entities in the aggregate amount of $170,000. All 10 of these notes bore a ten percent interest rate and were convertible into shares of our common stock at a rate of $0.16 per share. The current principle and interest balance on these notes as of December 31, 2007 was $177,581. On January 17, 2008 all 10 of these notes were converted to shares of the Company’s common stock.

On August 23, 2007 we issued a note payable to Ivan Zweig in the amount of $41,943 that bears a ten percent interest rate. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $45,591. This note is now owned by Kramerica.

On September 17, 2007 we issued a note payable to Ivan Zweig in the amount of $76,000 that bears a ten percent interest rate. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $82,098. This note is now owned by Kramerica.

On September 20, 2007 we issued two notes payable to Kramerica in the amounts of $15,000 and $34,113, respectively. They each bear a ten percent interest rate. The current principle and interest balances due on these notes as of September 30, 2008 were $16,191and $36,822, respectively.

On October 1, 2007 we issued a note payable to Kramerica in the amount of $44,000 that bears a ten percent interest rate. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $47,345.

On November 8, 2007 we issued a note payable to Kramerica in the amount of $16,187 that bears a ten percent interest rate. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $17,245.

On November 9, 2007 we issued a note payable to Kramerica in the amount of $17,900 that bears a ten percent interest rate. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $19,065.

On December 12, 2007 we issued a note payable to Newsgrade Corporation in the amount of $200,000 that bears a ten percent interest rate. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $159,158.

On January 18, 2008 we issued a secured note payable to GDBC, Inc. in the amount of $5,340 that bears a ten percent interest rate and is due on January 18, 2009. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $5,609. This note is secured by the assets of the company

Our total debt servicing requirements on the 17 outstanding promissory notes over the next 12 months will be approximately $1,158,004. However, we are currently negotiating further conversions.

NOTE 4- NOTES PAYABLE – (CONTINUED)

The notes payable balances were as follows:


	September 30,			March 31,
	2008			2008
Total notes payable	$	1,260,004		$	1,230,097
Less: current maturities		(1,158,004	)		(1,109,569	)
Long-term notes payable	$	102,000		$	120,528

The amount of principal maturities of the notes payable for the next three years ending September 30 and in the aggregate is as follows:


2009	$	1,158,004
2010		52,960
2011		49,040
	$	1,260,004

NOTE 5- OPERATING LEASES

The Company leased office space under a lease that commenced in June of 2005. The lease was payable on a month-to-month basis. Monthly payments under the current lease were $3,284. As of December 20, 2007 the Company sold its I-Element, Inc. subsidiary and this lease was included in the sale.

Rental payments charged to expense for the six months ended September 30, 2008 were $-0- and $9,852 respectively. As of September 30, 2008 the Company no longer had any operating leases.

NOTE 6- STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT)

Common Stock

As of September 30, 2008, the Company has 125,000,000 shares of common stock authorized at a par value of $0.001 and 33,149,501 shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted for the reverse stock split effective on January 11, 2008.

THE FOLLOWING DETAILS THE STOCK TRANSACTIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008:

The Company issued 4,600,000 shares of common stock for consulting services rendered and prepaid consulting valued at $46,000.

The Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock for administrative services rendered valued at $7500.

Blank Check Preferred Stock

The company also has 12,500,000 shares of Blank Check Preferred Stock authorized, as adjusted for the reverse stock split effective on January 11, 2008. There are no current plans to issue any Blank Check Preferred Stock.

NOTE 7- PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes will be determined using the liability method for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes will be measured based on the tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences are included in the Company’s tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

At September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, deferred tax assets consist of the following:


	September 30,			March 31,
	2008			2008
Net deferred tax assets	$	(2,025,060	)	$	(1,921,658	)
Less: valuation allowance		2,025,060			1,921,658
	$	––		$	––

NOTE 7- PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES – (CONTINUED)

At September 30, 2008, the Company had deficits accumulated in the approximate amount of $6,750,200 however, due to the transfer of its operating subsidiary, the Company will not have any taxable net operating losses to carry-forward to future years. In prior years, the Company established a valuation allowance equal to the full amount of the deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty of the utilization of the operating losses in future periods.

NOTE 9- GOING CONCERN

As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has sustained net operating losses for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise enough capital or generate revenues to sustain its operations. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s future success is dependent upon its ability to achieve profitable operations and generate cash from operating activities, and upon additional financing.

Management believes that the sale of the I-Element, Inc. subsidiary on December 20, 2007 will substantially reduce the cash requirements and allow the Company to continue as a going concern.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability or classification of recorded assets and liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Operation

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES TO THOSE STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION APPEARING ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT.

Our Current Business – Non-Operating Shell Company

Effective on December 20, 2007 with the divestiture of our sole operating subsidiary, we became a non-operating shell corporation. We now intend to effect a merger, acquisition or other business combination with an operating company by using a combination of capital stock, cash on hand, or other funding sources, if available. We intend to devote substantially all of our time to identifying potential merger or acquisition candidates. There can be no assurances that we will enter into such a transaction in the near future or on terms favorable to us, or that other funding sources will be available.

Subsequent Events - Possible Take-Over

On September 12, 2008, Susan Pursel, our CEO, entered into a letter agreement with Steven D. Roberts, PC regarding the possible take-over of Ielement as more particularly described in this Form 10Q, Part II, Item 5 – Other Information.

Our History

We are the product of a series of mergers and acquisitions that began in 1996.

By way of background, Northline Industrial Corporation was incorporated in Texas on December 28, 1988 ("NIC"). NIC was inactive until March 1996 whereupon it adopted a business plan providing for reincorporation in Nevada and the establishment of a charter cargo airline under the name "Air Epicurean". Consistent therewith, on July 19, 1996 NIC formed Air Epicurean, Inc. as a Nevada wholly-owned corporate subsidiary.

Air Epicurean, Inc. is the original predecessor to the issuer now known as IElement Corporation. In December 1996, NIC abandoned its previously adopted business plan to establish air carrier operations and initiated a search for a suitable merger candidate.

On March 5, 1997, NIC merged with and into Air Epicurean, Inc., the surviving corporation. Effective May 8, 1997, Air Epicurean changed its name to Ikon Ventures, Inc. ("Ikon"). Ikon remained inactive until August 2001 whereupon it acquired in a share-for-share exchange Sutton Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation. On October 31, 2001, Ikon changed its name to Sutton Trading Solutions, Inc.

On April 23, 2003, Sutton Trading Solutions, Inc. changed its name to Global Diversified Acquisition Corp. ("GDAC") to reflect that its principal activity was to seek a business combination with one or more as yet unidentified privately held businesses.

On March 25, 2004, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, GDAC acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of MK Secure Solutions Ltd ("MKSS"), a holding company incorporated on March 11, 2003 under the laws of the British Virgin Islands. The transaction was effectuated by the issuance of shares such that the former MKSS shareholders acquired approximately 90% of the outstanding GDAC stock after the transaction. GDAC then changed its name to MailKey Corporation ("MailKey").

On November 9, 2004, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with MailKey Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary ("Merger Sub"), IElement, Inc., a Nevada Corporation formed in December 2002 ("I-Element") and Ivan Zweig, pursuant to which we agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of I-Element. This transaction closed on January 19, 2005. At the closing of the Merger, Merger Sub was merged into I-Element, at which time the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub ceased and I-Element continued as the surviving company.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we issued our common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of I-Element. I-Element was a facilities-based nationwide communications service provider that provided state-of-the-art telecommunications services to small and medium sized enterprises. In connection with the closing of the merger in January 2005, we entered into a letter of intent with Ivan Zweig and Kramerica Capital Corporation ("Kramerica"), a corporation wholly-owned by Mr. Zweig, pursuant to which the parties entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Zweig whereby he continued to serve as our Chief Executive Officer, a position he held since March 2003. In addition, the letter of intent conveyed certain rights to Kramerica in the event of a default by the Company of certain financial obligations associated with the merger. Effective January 24, 2005, Mr. Zweig was also appointed to our Board of Directors.

On January 19, 2005, upon the consummation of the merger, we issued eight (8) promissory notes to: (a) Kramerica, (b) certain members of Mr. Zweig's immediate family and (c) others in the aggregate amount of $376,956.16 (the "Notes"). The Notes were payable in 36 monthly installments with the first payment commencing six months after the closing of the merger and were secured by substantially all of our assets. We did not make any payments on the Notes. On March 25, 2006 each of the Notes were cancelled and we issued new convertible promissory notes to the same individuals in the same principal amount of $376,956.16.

The Note holders have the right to convert all or a portion of the outstanding balance, at any time until the notes are paid in full, into our common stock at a conversion price of $0.035 per share. The aggregate principal of the Kramerica notes was $120,000 and were issued for services rendered prior to issuance. The $50,000 note was originally issued on June 1, 2004 for services prior to that date and was restated subsequent to the merger on January 19, 2005. The remaining $70,000 note was issued on January 19, 2005 for services rendered prior to that date. On October 6, 2006 we reached agreements with the holders of these eight Notes to extend the first payment date until April 1, 2007. We did not make any payments on the Notes.

On August 1, 2005, we filed with the SEC an Information Statement on Schedule 14C to change our name from MailKey Corporation to IElement Corporation. Concurrent with this name change, we received a new stock trading symbol (IELM.OB) on the NASDAQ Over-the-Counter Electronic Bulletin Board. We also received stockholder consent to amend our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized from 100 million shares to 2 billion shares, and to authorize 200 million shares of Blank Check Preferred Stock., none of which have been designated or issued.

On August 8, 2005, Tim Dean-Smith and Susan Walton resigned their positions on our Board of Directors (the “Board”). The resignations of Mr. Dean-Smith and Ms. Walton were consistent with the expectations of the parties pursuant to the terms of our merger with I-Element in January 2005, and did not arise from any disagreement on any matter relating to operations, policies, practices or the general direction of the Company. Neither Mr. Dean-Smith nor Ms. Walton served on any subcommittees of the Board. Ivan Zweig was appointed as the interim Chief Financial Officer and to the Board.

In March 2006, Ivan Zweig, as our only Director, appointed Lance Stovall and Ken Willey to the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting, at which time all three Directors were up for re-election. On December 6, 2006 the Board of Directors unanimously appointed Charles Carlson to the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting.

On December 15, 2006 at our annual shareholders meeting, Ivan Zweig, Lance Stovall and Ken Willey were re-elected to the Board of Directors. Charles Carlson also continued to serve his initial term on the Board of Directors but was not up for re-election. Mr. Carlson resigned his position on the Board of Directors in April 2007. His resignation did not arise from any disagreement on any matter relating to operations, policies, practices or the general direction of the Company.

On December 27, 2006, we entered into a Management Services and Vendor Agreement with Sutioc Enterprises, Inc, to offer management and vendor services to both Sutioc Enterprises, Inc. and its majority owned subsidiary U.S. Wireless, Inc. In addition to being a majority shareholder, Sutioc Enterprises was party to a Management Agreement with US Wireless Online, Inc. whereby Sutioc Enterprises was appointed the Manager of US Wireless Online with broad discretion to retain the services of third parties to perform management and other services both on behalf of Sutioc Enterprises, in its capacity as Manager for US Wireless Online, and for US Wireless Online directly. Both our management agreement with Sutioc and Sutioc’s agreement with US Wireless were terminated on August 30, 2007.

On June 19, 2007, we reached agreement with the eight Note holders to extend the payment terms so that the first of 36 monthly payments on each of the notes was due on April 1, 2008. Four of these eight Note holders received on June 19, 2007 a total of 5,400,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for extension of the principle repayment terms. On January 23, 2008 six of the eight Notes were converted into 3,173,612 shares of our common stock. The total aggregate principle balance of the remaining two notes as of March 31, 2008 was $173,845.

On June 27, 2007, Ken Willey resigned from his position on the Board of Directors. His resignation did not arise from any disagreement on any matter relating to operations, policies, practices or the general direction of the Company.

On August 7, 2007 our Board of Directors unanimously appointed Art Eckert to the Board until the next annual meeting. On September 13, 2007 the Board removed Art Eckert from the Board. Mr. Eckert was removed as a result of the termination of negotiations with Micro Data Systems regarding a potential merger transaction. Mr. Eckert was previously appointed to the Board of Directors as an advisor to Micro Data Systems and to assist in the due diligence process.

On December 20, 2007 we sold our main operating subsidiary, I-Element, Inc. along with certain assets and liabilities related to that telecommunications business, to Ivan Zweig. In conjunction with this transaction, Mr. Zweig released us from any and all liability under his employment agreement as well as a consulting agreement with Kramerica, both dated January 1, 2007, and he resigned all officer and director positions he held with us. In addition, Mr. Zweig agreed to cancel all of his outstanding warrants and options to purchase our capital stock. Mr. Zweig and I-Element also agreed to indemnify us from liabilities arising prior to December 20, 2007.

Also on December 20, 2007, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Newsgrade Corporation (“Newsgrade”), pursuant to which we agreed to purchase from Newsgrade one (1) million shares of common stock of The Retirement Solutions.com, Inc. As consideration for the purchase, we agreed to pay to Newsgrade at closing $200,000 in the form of a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Convertible Note”) due and payable one year from issuance with 10% interest and convertible into shares of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors on December 27, 2007 approved a reverse split of our common stock in a ratio of one (1) new share for every sixteen (16) outstanding shares of common stock. Our authorized shares of common stock was proportionately reduced. The record and effective date of the reverse split was January 11, 2008.

On January 22, 2008 we issued a total of 3,173,612 post split (50,777,778 pre-split) shares of common stock in exchange for the release of indebtedness in the total amount of $203,111. The debt was evidenced by promissory notes issued to Kramerica, Inc., Ivan Zweig and his family, who had sold the debt to third parties prior to the conversion.

Our Recent Former Business – Telecommunications

Prior to the sale of I-Element on December 20, 2007, we were a facilities-based nationwide communications service provider that offered telecommunications services to small and medium sized businesses. As a facilities-based provider, we owned our own network equipment including telephone switches. That is, we sold local and long distance telephone service and Internet access primarily via digital T-1 connections and tailored the particular service to the customer's needs by regulating bandwidth, number of telephone lines, and type of service. Our Layer 2 Private Network service allowed businesses with multiple locations to connect all of their locations securely without the use of firewalls or encryption devices and without routing traffic over the internet. In addition, we developed, tested and deployed our Voice over Internet Protocol service. We had a network presence in 18 major markets in the United States, including facilities in Los Angeles, Dallas, Chicago and smaller facilities in ten other cities.

In addition to the above operations, from December 2006 through August 30, 2007 we provided management and vendor services, on behalf of Sutioc Enterprises, Inc., to Sutioc’s customer base of wireless subscribers.

As our revenue and customer base continued to decline and competition in the telecommunications industry continued to increase, our business model suffered in two respects. First, our customers left us for other providers and second, when we did renew our customers' contracts, we did so at rates up to 20 percent lower than they had been paying. To combat this revenue attrition, we intended to partner with a company that has a dedicated sales force. This would have allowed us to pursue new customers that more than replaced the revenue lost to attrition.

Our overall financial condition improved significantly with the completion of our private equity placement in January 2006 and the increased liquidity it brought. Since that time, however, our overall financial condition continued to deteriorate. Our telecommunications business was failing because of our negative cash flow. While we pursued a number of business combinations and fundraising opportunities, we were unable to complete an acquisition or secure adequate funding. Consequently, we enhanced our financial position by selling I-Element, Inc. and exiting the telecommunications business on December 20, 2007.

We previously factored most of our accounts receivable with an outside agency until December 20, 2007 whereupon we ceased such activity in connection with the sale of I-Element, Inc.

As of July 7, 2008 we had six (6) subsidiaries: (a) I-Element, (b) IElement Telephone of California formed on November 14, 2005 to acquire and administer a telecommunications license in the state of California, (c) IElement Telephone of Arizona formed on March 13, 2006 to acquire and administer a telecommunications license in the state of Arizona, (d) IElement Telephone of Nevada, Inc. formed on July 11, 2006 to acquire and administer a telecommunications license in the state of Nevada, (e) IElement Telephone of Kentucky, Inc. formed on December 29, 2006 to acquire and administer a telecommunications license in the state of Kentucky, and (f) IElement Telephone of Pennsylvania, Inc. formed on December 29, 2006 to acquire and administer a telecommunications license in the state of Pennsylvania. None of these subsidiaries are active.

Our Current Business Plan

We are a shell company in that we have nominal operations and nominal assets. At this time, our purpose is to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire an interest in business opportunities presented to us by persons or firms who or which desire to seek the perceived advantages of an Exchange Act registered corporation. We will not restrict our search to any specific business, industry, or geographical location and we may participate in a business venture of virtually any kind or nature. This discussion of the proposed business is purposefully general and is not meant to be restrictive of our virtually unlimited discretion to search for and enter into potential business opportunities. We anticipate that we may be able to participate in only one potential business venture because of our nominal assets and limited financial resources. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk to our shareholders because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another.

We may seek a business opportunity with entities which have recently commenced operations, or which wish to utilize the public marketplace in order to raise additional capital in order to expand into new products or markets, to develop a new product or service, or for other corporate purposes.

We intend to promote ourselves privately. We have not yet begun such promotional activities. We anticipate that the selection of a business opportunity in which to participate will be complex and risky. Due to general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries and shortages of available capital, we believe that there are numerous firms seeking the perceived benefits of a publicly registered corporation. Such perceived benefits may include facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be sought, providing liquidity for incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, providing liquidity (subject to restrictions of applicable statutes), for all shareholders, and other factors. Potentially, available business opportunities may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities difficult and complex.

We have, and will continue to have, little or no capital with which to provide the owners of business opportunities with any significant cash or other assets. However, we believe we will be able to offer owners of acquisition candidates the opportunity to acquire a controlling ownership interest in a publicly registered company without incurring the cost and time required to conduct an initial public offering. The owners of the business opportunities will, however, incur significant legal and accounting costs in connection with the acquisition of a business opportunity, including the costs of preparing Form 8K's, 10Q’s, 10K's, agreements and related reports and documents. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "34 Act"), specifically requires that any merger or acquisition candidate comply with all applicable reporting requirements, which include providing audited financial statements to be included within the numerous filings relevant to complying with the `34 Act. We have not conducted market research and are not aware of statistical data which would support the perceived benefits of a merger or acquisition transaction for the owners of a business opportunity.

The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken with such outside assistance as is appropriate. We intend to concentrate on identifying preliminary prospective business opportunities which may be brought to our attention through our present associations. In analyzing prospective business opportunities, we will consider such matters as the available technical, financial and managerial resources; working capital and other financial requirements; history of operations, if any; prospects for the future; nature of present and expected competition; the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that management; the potential for further research, development, or exploration; specific risk factors not now foreseeable but which then may be anticipated to impact our proposed activities; the potential for growth or expansion; the potential for profit; the perceived public recognition of acceptance of products, services, or trades; name identification; and other relevant factors.

We expect to meet personally with management and key personnel of the business opportunity as part of the investigation. To the extent possible, we intend to utilize written reports and investigation to evaluate the above factors.

The foregoing criteria are not intended to be exhaustive and there may be other criteria that we may deem relevant. In connection with an evaluation of a prospective or potential business opportunity, we will be expected to conduct a due diligence review.

We may from time to time utilize outside consultants or advisors to effectuate our business purposes described herein. No policies have been adopted regarding use of such consultants or advisors, the criteria to be used in selecting such consultants or advisors, the services to be provided, the term of service, or regarding the total amount of fees that may be paid. However, because of our limited resources, it is likely that any such fee would be paid in stock and not in cash.

We will not restrict our search for any specific kind of firm, but may acquire a venture which is in its preliminary or development stage, which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its corporate life. It is impossible to predict at this time the status of any business in which we may become engaged, in that such business may need to seek additional capital, may desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which we may offer. The time and costs required to pursue new business opportunities, which includes negotiating and documenting relevant agreements and preparing requisite documents for filing pursuant to applicable securities laws, cannot be ascertained with any degree of certainty.

We intend to devote such time as is necessary to carry out our affairs. The exact length of time required for the pursuit of any new potential business opportunities is uncertain. No assurance can be made that we will be successful in our efforts. We cannot project the amount of time that our management will actually devote to our plan of operation.

We intend to conduct our activities so as to avoid being classified as an "Investment Company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and therefore avoid application of the costly and restrictive registration and other provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

At present, we are a development stage company with no revenues and no specific business plan or purpose. Our business plan is to seek new business opportunities or to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company.

Acquisition of Opportunities

In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, we may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity. We may also acquire stock or assets of an existing business. On the consummation of a transaction, it is probable that our present management and our shareholders will no longer be in control of the Company. In addition, our directors may, as part of the terms of the acquisition transaction, resign and be replaced by new directors without a vote of our shareholders or may sell our stock. Any and all such sales will only be made in compliance with the securities laws of the United States and any applicable state.

It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such reorganization would be issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of its transaction, we may agree to register all or a part of such securities immediately after the transaction is consummated or at specified times thereafter. If such registration occurs, of which there can be no assurance, it will be undertaken by the surviving entity after we have successfully consummated a merger or acquisition.

With respect to any merger or acquisition, negotiations with target company management are expected to focus on the percentage of the Company which the target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for all of their shareholdings in the target company. Depending upon, among other things, the target company's assets and liabilities, our shareholders will in all likelihood hold a substantially lesser percentage ownership interest in the Company following any merger or acquisition. The percentage ownership may be subject to significant reduction in the event we acquire a target company with substantial assets. Any merger or acquisition can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by our then shareholders.

We will participate in a business opportunity only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate written agreements. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will require some specific representations and warranties by all of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by each of the parties prior to and after such closing, will outline the manner of bearing costs, including costs associated with our attorneys and accountants, will set forth remedies on default and will include miscellaneous other terms.

Competitio

We will remain an insignificant participant among the firms which engage in the acquisition of business opportunities. There are many established venture capital and financial concerns which have significantly greater financial and personnel resources and technical expertise. In view of our combined extremely limited financial resources and limited management availability, we will continue to be at a significant competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 (Q1 2008)

COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (Q1 2007)

Revenues

Revenues were $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were reclassified to $0 due to the sale, in December 2007, of our telecommunications operating subsidiary and corresponding cessation of operations.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses excluding cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were $73,333 compared to $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was due to the reclassification of expenses in conjunction with the sale, in December 2007, of our telecommunications operating subsidiary and corresponding cessation of operations.

(Loss) From Continuing Operations

Loss from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $73,333 as compared to $0 for the year three months ended June 30, 2007. The net loss is primarily attributable to stock issued to employees and consultants.

Net (Loss) Applicable to Common Stock

Net loss applicable to Common Stock was $103,333 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to a loss of $1,341,286 for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Net loss per common share for continued operations was less than $.01 and for discontinued operations was $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

The lower net loss in the three months ended September 30, 2008 when compared with the three months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to the discontinued operations of our telecommunications business in December 2007.

SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008

COMPARED TO SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007

Revenues

Revenues were $0 for the six months ended September 30, 2008. Revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2007 were reclassified to $0 due to the sale, in December 2007, of our telecommunications operating subsidiary and corresponding cessation of operations.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses excluding cost of revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2008 were $237,576 compared to $0 for the six months ended September 30, 2007. This difference was due to the reclassification of expenses in conjunction with the sale, in December 2007, of our telecommunications operating subsidiary and corresponding cessation of operations.

(Loss) From Continuing Operations

Loss from continuing operations for the six months ended September 30, 2008 was $237,576 as compared to $0 for the year three months ended September 30, 2007. The net loss is primarily attributable to stock issued to employees and consultants and interest expense.

Net (Loss) Applicable to Common Stock

Net loss applicable to Common Stock was $344,674 for the six months ended September 30, 2008 compared to a loss of $1,956,108 for the six months ended September 30, 2007. Net loss per common share for continued operations was $.01 and for discontinued operations was $0 for the six months ended September 30, 2008.

The lower net loss in the six months ended September 30, 2008 when compared with the six months ended September 30, 2007 is primarily attributable to the discontinued operations of our telecommunications business in December 2007.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Since our inception, we have funded our operations primarily through private sales of equity securities and the utilization of short-term convertible debt. As of September 30, 2008 we had a cash balance of $12.

On October 6, 2006 we reached agreements with the holders of these eight Notes to extend the first payment date until April 1, 2007. We did not make any payments on the notes.

On January 28, 2008 we issued a secured note payable to William M. Goatley Revocable Trust in the amount of $120,000 that bears a ten percent interest rate and is due on January 28, 2009. The current principle and interest balance on this note as of September 30, 2008 was $126,058. This note is secured by the assets of the company Our total debt servicing requirements on the 17 outstanding promissory notes over the next 12 months will be approximately $1,158,004. However, we are currently negotiating further conversions.

Our total debt servicing requirements on the 17 outstanding promissory notes over the next 12 months will be approximately $1,158,004. However, we are currently negotiating further conversions.

Subsequent event. On September 12, 2008, Susan Pursel, our CEO, entered into a letter agreement with Steven D. Roberts, PC (“SDRPC”) whereby SDRPC or its nominee proposes to acquire control of Ielement. Specifically, SDRPC proposes to satisfy certain of Ielement’s secured debt, certain obligations and fees and expenses including those related to compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s reporting requirements. In exchange therefor, SDRPC or its nominee shall receive control of Ielement. The agreement is contingent, in part, on funding and satisfactory due diligence performed by SDRPC or its nominee.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Company continues to assess the effects of recently issued accounting standards. The impact of all recently adopted and issued accounting standards has been disclosed in the Notes.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The Company is a shell company and, as such, the Company does not employ critical accounting estimates. Should the Company resume operations it will employ critical accounting estimates and will make any and all disclosures that are necessary and appropriate.

OFF BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTIONS

The Company has no off balance sheet arrangements and has not entered into any transactions involving unconsolidated, limited purpose entities

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company maintains a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that this information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that information required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms.

The Company’s board of directors was advised by Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company, L.L.C., the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, that it has identified a material weakness as defined in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Standard No. 2 in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

This deficiency consisted primarily of inadequate staffing and supervision that could lead to the untimely identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters and failure to perform timely and effective reviews. However, the size of the Company prevents us from being able to employ sufficient resources to enable us to have adequate segregation of duties within our internal control system. Management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

No changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting have come to management's attention during the Company's last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings nor is any of our property the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds.

none

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

none

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

none

Item 5.

Other Information

On September 12, 2008, Susan Pursel, our CEO, entered into a letter agreement with Steven D. Roberts, PC (“SDRPC”) whereby SDRPC or its nominee proposes to acquire control of Ielement. Specifically, SDRPC proposes to satisfy certain of Ielement’s secured debt, certain obligations and fees and expenses including those related to compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s reporting requirements. In exchange therefor, SDRPC or its nominee shall receive control of Ielement. The agreement is contingent, in part, on funding and satisfactory due diligence performed by SDRPC or its nominee.

Item 6.

Exhibits


EXHIBIT NUMBER		DESCRIPTION
31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of IElement Corporation pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of IElement Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	IElement Corporation


	By:	/s/ SUSAN PURSEL
	Name:	Susan Pursel
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director
	Date:	November 18, 2008

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:


	IElement Corporation


	By:	/s/ PAUL LENGEMANN
	Name:	Paul Lengemann
	Title:	Director
	Date:	November 18, 2008

IElement CORP 10-Q