Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies	9 Months Ended
Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies	Sep. 29, 2017
Disclosure Text Block
Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies	(1) Summary of Business and Significant Accounting Policies Summary of Business CH2M HILL Companies, Ltd. and subsidiaries (“We”, “Our”, “CH2M” or the “Company”) is a large employee-controlled professional engineering services firm, founded in 1946, providing engineering, construction, consulting, design, design‑build, procurement, engineering‑procurement‑construction (“EPC”), operations and maintenance, program management and technical services to United States (“U.S.”) federal, state, municipal and local government agencies, national governments, as well as private industry and utilities, around the world. A substantial portion of our professional fees are derived from projects that are funded directly or indirectly by government entities. Proposed Acquisition by Jacobs Engineering On August 1, 2017, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger Agreement”) with Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Jacobs”) and Basketball Merger Sub Inc. (“Merger Sub”). The Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Merger Sub with and into CH2M, with CH2M continuing as the surviving company and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Jacobs. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of our common stock will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder thereof, (i) a combination of $52.85 in cash and 0.6677 shares of Jacobs common stock, (ii) $88.08 in cash or (iii) 1.6693 shares of Jacobs common stock. Each outstanding share of our preferred stock will be deemed converted into shares of our common stock in accordance with the Certificate of Designation for such preferred stock, and such shares will also be automatically converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder thereof, the same merger consideration. Stockholder elections with respect to the form of merger consideration to be received in connection with the Merger Agreement will be subject to proration, such that the overall consideration to be paid by Jacobs in connection with the Merger will be 60% in the form of cash and 40% in the form of shares of Jacobs common stock. The merger is subject to approval by our stockholders, performance by the parties of all their obligations under the Merger Agreement, regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. On September 25, 2017, the parties satisfied the requirements under the Canadian Competition Act. On October 18, 2017, Jacobs and CH2M received early termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, from the Federal Trade Commission. On October 25, 2017, Jacobs and CH2M received clearance from the European Commission pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the Control of Concentrations Between Undertakings, as amended. On November 9, 2017, CH2M filed a definitive proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announcing that a special meeting of CH2M stockholders will be held on December 13, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Mountain time, at CH2M’s World Headquarters, 9191 South Jamaica Street, Englewood, Colorado, 80112, USA, to seek adoption of the merger agreement, among other things. Also on November 9, 2017, the SEC declared effective the amended registration statement filed on Form S-4 by Jacobs. On or about November 10, 2017, CH2M commenced mailing the Notice of Special Meeting and the definitive proxy statement to stockholders of CH2M as of the close of business on November 8, 2017, the record date for the special meeting. We anticipate that the transaction will be consummated prior to the end of calendar 2017. However, we cannot predict with certainty whether and when all of the required closing conditions will be satisfied or if the merger will close. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and according to instructions to Form 10-Q and the provisions of Article 10 of Regulation S-X that are applicable to interim financial statements. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information required by GAAP or the SEC rules and regulations for annual audited financial statements. The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and assumptions have been prepared on the basis of the most current and best available information. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2016. Revenue Recognition We earn revenue from different types of services performed under various types of contracts, including cost-plus, fixed-price and time-and-materials. We evaluate contractual arrangements to determine how to recognize revenue. We primarily perform engineering and construction related services and recognize revenue for these contracts on the percentage-of-completion method where progress towards completion is measured by relating the actual cost of work performed to date to the current estimated total cost of the respective contract. In making such estimates, judgments are required to evaluate potential variances in schedule, the cost of materials and labor, productivity, subcontractor costs, liability claims, contract disputes, and achievement of contract performance standards. We record the cumulative effect of changes in contract revenue and cost at completion in the period in which the changed estimates are determined to be reliably estimable. Below is a description of the four basic types of contracts from which we may earn revenue: Cost-Plus Contracts. Cost-plus contracts can be cost plus a fixed fee or rate, or cost plus an award fee. Under these types of contracts, we charge our clients for our costs, including both direct and indirect costs, plus a fixed fee or an award fee. We generally recognize revenue based on the labor and non-labor costs we incur, plus the portion of the fixed fee or award fee we have earned to date. Included in the total contract value for cost-plus fee arrangements is the portion of the fee for which receipt is determined to be probable. Award fees are influenced by the achievement of contract milestones, cost savings and other factors. Fixed-Price Contracts. Under fixed-price contracts, our clients pay us an agreed amount negotiated in advance for a specified scope of work. For engineering and construction contracts, we recognize revenue on fixed-price contracts using the percentage-of-completion method where direct costs incurred to date are compared to total projected direct costs at contract completion. Prior to completion, our recognized profit margins on any fixed-price contract depend on the accuracy of our estimates and will increase to the extent that our actual costs are below the original estimated amounts. Conversely, if our costs exceed these estimates, our profit margins will decrease, and we may realize a loss on a project. The significance of these estimates varies with the complexity of the underlying project, with our large, fixed-price EPC projects being most significant. Time-and-Materials Contracts. Under our time-and-materials contracts, we negotiate hourly billing rates and charge our clients based on the actual time that we expend on a project. In addition, clients reimburse us for our actual out of pocket costs of materials and other direct expenditures that we incur in connection with our performance under the contract. Our profit margins on time-and-materials contracts fluctuate based on actual labor and overhead costs that we directly charge or allocate to contracts compared with the negotiated billing rate and markup on other direct costs. Some of our time-and-materials contracts are subject to maximum contract values, and accordingly, revenue under these contracts is recognized under the percentage-of-completion method where costs incurred to date are compared to total projected costs at contract completion. Revenue on contracts that is not subject to maximum contract values is recognized based on the actual number of hours we spend on the projects plus any actual out of pocket costs of materials and other direct expenditures that we incur on the projects. Operations and Maintenance Contracts. A portion of our contracts are operations and maintenance type contracts. Revenue is recognized on operations and maintenance contracts on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract once we have an arrangement, service has begun, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. For all contract types noted above, change orders are included in total estimated contract revenue when it is probable that the change order will result in an addition to contract value and when the change order can be estimated. Management evaluates when a change order is probable based upon its experience in negotiating change orders, the customer’s written approval of such changes or separate documentation of change order costs that are identifiable. Additional contract revenue related to claims is included in total estimated contract revenue when the amount can be reliably estimated, which is typically evidenced by a contract or other evidence providing a legal basis for the claim. Losses on construction and engineering contracts in process are recognized in their entirety when the loss becomes evident and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Accounts Receivable We reduce accounts receivable by estimating an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. Management determines the estimated allowance for uncollectible amounts based on their judgments in evaluating the aging of the receivables and the financial condition of our clients, which may be dependent on the type of client and the client’s current financial condition. Unbilled Revenue and Billings in Excess of Revenue Unbilled revenue represents the excess of contract revenue recognized over billings to date on contracts in process. These amounts become billable according to the contract terms, which usually consider the passage of time, achievement of certain milestones or completion of the project. Billings in excess of revenue represent the excess of billings to date, per the contract terms, over work performed and revenue recognized on contracts in process using the percentage-of-completion method. Fair Value Measurements Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Assets and liabilities are valued based upon observable and non-observable inputs. Valuations using Level 1 inputs are based on unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs utilize significant other observable inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly; and valuations using Level 3 inputs are based on significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. There were no significant transfers between levels during any period presented. Restructuring and Related Charges An exit activity includes but is not limited to a restructuring, such as a sale or termination of a line of business, the closure of business activities in a particular location, the relocation of business activities from one location to another, changes in management structure, and a fundamental reorganization that affects the nature and focus of operations. The Company recognizes a current and long-term liability, within other accrued liabilities and other long term liabilities, respectively, and the related expense, within selling, general and administrative expense, for restructuring costs when the liability is incurred and can be measured. Restructuring accruals are based upon management estimates at the time they are recorded and can change depending upon changes in facts and circumstances subsequent to the date the original liability was recorded. Nonretirement postemployment benefits offered as special termination benefits to employees, such as a voluntary early retirement program, are recognized as a liability and a loss when the employee accepts the offer and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of the assets of businesses we have acquired. Goodwill acquired in a purchase business combination is not amortized, but instead, is tested for impairment at least annually. Our annual goodwill impairment test is conducted as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each year, however, upon the occurrence of certain triggering events, we are also required to test for impairment at dates other than the annual impairment testing date. In performing the impairment test, we evaluate our goodwill at the reporting unit level. We have the option to assess either quantitative or qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units are less than their carrying amounts. If after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units are less than their carrying amounts, then the next step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If we conclude otherwise, then we are required to test goodwill for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to the unit’s carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit does not exceed its fair value, the goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, we would recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We determine the fair value of our reporting units using a combination of the income approach, the market approach, and the cost approach. The income approach calculates the present value of future cash flows based on assumptions and estimates derived from a review of our expected revenue growth rates, profit margins, business plans, cost of capital and tax rates for the reporting units. Our market based valuation method estimates the fair value of our reporting units by the application of a multiple to our estimate of a cash flow metric for each business unit. The cost approach estimates the fair value of a reporting unit as the net replacement cost using current market quotes. Intangible Assets We may acquire other intangible assets in business combinations. Intangible assets are stated at fair value as of the date they are acquired in a business combination. We amortize intangible assets with finite lives on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives, currently up to ten years. We test our intangible assets for impairment in the period in which a triggering event or change in circumstance indicates that the carrying amount of the intangible asset may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss will be recognized in the amount of the excess. We determine the fair value of the intangible assets using a discounted cash flow approach. Derivative Instruments We primarily enter into derivative financial instruments to mitigate exposures to changing foreign currency exchange rates on our earnings and cash flows. We are primarily subject to this risk on long-term projects whereby the currency being paid by our client differs from the currency in which we incurred our costs, as well as intercompany trade balances among entities with differing currencies. We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes. All derivatives are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets in other receivables or other accrued liabilities as applicable. The periodic change in the fair value of the derivative instruments related to our business group operations is recognized in earnings within direct costs. The periodic change in the fair value of the derivative instruments related to our general corporate foreign currency exposure is recognized within selling, general and administrative expense. Retirement and Tax-Deferred Savings Plan The Retirement and Tax Deferred Savings Plan is a retirement plan that includes a cash or deferred arrangement that is intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and provides benefits to eligible employees upon retirement. The 401(k) Plan allows for matching contributions up to 58.33% of the first 6% of elective deferrals up to 3.5% of the employee’s quarterly base compensation, although specific subsidiaries may have different limits on employer matching. The matching contributions may be made in both cash and/or stock. Expenses related to matching contributions made in cash and common stock for the 401(k) Plan for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2017 was $7.5 million and $22.0 million, respectively, as compared to $8.3 million and $21.3 million of expenses related to matching contributions made in common stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards In May 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-09, Compensation- Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in this update provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods, and early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this update should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. Once effective, we will apply this guidance to future changes to terms or conditions of our stock-based payment awards to determine if it triggers modification accounting, but we do not believe this ASU will materially change how we currently evaluate similar occurrences. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The amendments in this ASU require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and report the service cost component in the same statement of income line item as other compensation costs for the relevant employees. Additionally, only the service cost component of net benefit cost would be eligible for capitalization. The ASU requires that the other components of net benefit cost be presented outside of income or loss from operations on the statement of income, separate from the service cost component. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost and net periodic postretirement benefit in assets. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, and early adoption is permitted. Currently, the net periodic pension expense or income related to our defined pension benefit plans in the U.S. and internationally is presented within selling, general and administrative expense. Therefore, we anticipate the adoption of this ASU to impact the presentation of our statement of operations, including the subtotal of income or loss from operations. Refer to Note 13 – Defined Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits for detail of our net periodic pension expense or income by component. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test of Goodwill Impairment. This ASU was issued with the objective of simplifying the subsequent measurement of goodwill for public business entities and not-for-profit entities by eliminating the second step of the goodwill impairment test. As a result, an entity would perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we early adopted this standard which will be effective for our annual goodwill impairment test to be conducted as of the first day of the fourth quarter of 2017. We do not believe this ASU will have a material impact on our financial statements. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control. This standard amends the guidance issued with ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis in order to make it less likely that a single decision maker would individually meet the characteristics to be the primary beneficiary of a Variable Interest Entity ("VIE"). When a decision maker or service provider considers indirect interests held through related parties under common control, they perform two steps. The second step was amended with this ASU to say that the decision maker should consider interests held by these related parties on a proportionate basis when determining the primary beneficiary of the VIE rather than in their entirety as was called for in the previous guidance. The adoption of this standard in the current reporting period did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This ASU was issued with the objective to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The new standard will require companies to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of non-inventory assets when the transfer occurs. This ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on our financial position and results of operations. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU provides guidance for eight specific changes with respect to how certain cash receipts and cash payments are classified within the statement of cash flows in order to reduce existing diversity in practice. This ASU will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted, and it should be applied using a retroactive transition method to each period presented. We are currently evaluating the impacts the adoption of this standard will have on our consolidated statements of cash flows, focusing on the impact our cash flows related to distributions received from equity method investees and contingent consideration payments made subsequent to business combinations. We anticipate that approximately $0.2 million and $17.9 million of acquisition related payments within our investing cash flows for the nine months ended September 29, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively, will be reclassified to financing cash flows as a result of adopting this ASU. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This ASU is a comprehensive new leases standard that was issued to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We continue to assess the impact of adopting ASU 2016-02, but expect to record a significant amount of right-of-use assets and corresponding liabilities. Based upon our operating leases as of September 29, 2017, we expect to have in excess of $500.0 million of undiscounted future minimum lease payments upon adoption of this standard. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments issued with this ASU require equity securities (including other ownership interests, such as partnerships, unincorporated joint ventures, and limited liability companies) to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income. An entity’s equity investments that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or result in consolidation of an investee are not included within the scope of this update. This ASU will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. We believe this standard’s impact on CH2M will be limited to equity securities currently accounted for under the cost method of accounting, which as of September 29, 2017 are valued at $3.5 million within investments in unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated balance sheet. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated statements of operations. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and subsequently modified with various amendments and clarifications. This ASU is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The ASU also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. This ASU, as amended, is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this ASU. CH2M is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, the subsequently issued amendments, and the transition alternatives on its financial position and results of operations. Currently, we have identified various revenue streams by contract billing type, client type, and type of contracted services. We are in the process of reviewing our contracts in the various revenue streams in order to isolate those that will be significantly impacted as well as to identify the relevant revenue streams for disaggregated disclosure. From our initial assessment, we do not anticipate the new revenue recognition standard to, in substance, change our current process of recognizing revenue on a substantial portion of our portfolio of contracts. For example, we currently estimate variable consideration in relation to total contract revenue in a manner consistent with the new model, and our initial evaluation of performance obligations coincides with our current contract segmentation policies. After our assessment is complete, we can begin estimating the potential financial impacts of the new standard as well as identify necessary controls, processes and information system changes.

CH2M HILL COMPANIES LTD 10-Q