Legal Proceedings	9 Months Ended
Nov. 02, 2019
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Legal Proceedings	12. Legal Proceedings The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Management does not expect that the results of any of these legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. As of November 2, 2019, the Company has recorded a reserve for certain legal contingencies in connection with ongoing claims and litigation. The reserve is not material to its results of operations. In addition, there are certain other claims and legal proceedings pending against the Company for which accruals have not been established. Eaton Vance Management, et al. v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, et al., Index No. 654397/2017, (Sup. Ct. N.Y. C’ty.). On June 22, 2017, Eaton Vance Management and certain affiliated funds as well as Highland Capital Management and certain affiliated funds (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), filed a complaint in the New York State Supreme Court, Commercial Division, against the Company and WSFS, seeking, among other things, declarations that the July 13, 2017 Amendment to the Term Loan Facility was ineffective absent unanimous consent of all lenders under the facility, that certain of the Company’s actions with respect to certain of its intellectual property assets were taken in violation of the terms of the Term Loan Facility, and that those actions also constituted fraudulent conveyances. On August 7, 2017, WSFS and the Company filed separate motions to dismiss certain of Plaintiffs’ claims for failure to state a claim and lack of standing, among other reasons. On September 7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in the New York State Supreme Court, Commercial Division, against the Company and WSFS. The amended complaint continued to assert claims for breach of the terms of the Term Loan Facility, and for fraudulent conveyance and added an additional claim for fraudulent inducement against the Company. In response to the amended complaint, WSFS and the Company withdrew their prior motions to dismiss and, on October 20, 2017, filed renewed motions seeking dismissal in whole or part. Among other things, the Company sought dismissal of the amended complaint for failure to state a claim, lack of standing, and because its fraud claims are duplicative of Plaintiffs’ claims under the documents governing the Term Loan Facility. Plaintiffs filed an omnibus brief on December 1, 2017 opposing the motions to dismiss. The Company and WSFS each filed reply briefs on December 22, 2017 reiterating that the majority of Plaintiffs’ claims should be dismissed as a matter of law. Oral argument on the motions to dismiss occurred on March 8, 2018. On April 25, 2018, the judge issued a Memorandum Decision and Order, which granted the Company’s partial motion to dismiss in its entirety and dismissed as a matter of law the majority of Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs’ sole remaining claim is for breach of contract based on the theory that the July 13, 2017 Amendment to the Term Loan Facility required unanimous consent of all lenders under the facility. On October 25, 2018, Highland Capital Management and certain affiliated funds were dismissed from the action with prejudice. On November 21, 2018, the remaining Plaintiffs filed a limited appeal of the judge’s April 25, 2018 Memorandum Decision and Order with the First Department of the New York Appellate Division in an attempt to resuscitate their fraudulent conveyance claim. The Company filed an opposition brief on February 14, 2019, arguing that the trial court properly dismissed the fraudulent conveyance claim. On March 8, 2019, the remaining Plaintiffs filed a reply brief in support of their appeal. Oral argument on the appeal occurred on April 2, 2019. On April 25, 2019, the First Department unanimously affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the fraudulent conveyance claim with prejudice. Discovery in the action is ongoing. The Company believes that the remaining claim is wholly without merit, and intends to vigorously oppose the claim.

Legal Proceedings

9 Months Ended

Nov. 02, 2019

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

12. Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Management does not expect that the results of any of these legal proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. As of November 2, 2019, the Company has recorded a reserve for certain legal contingencies in connection with ongoing claims and litigation. The reserve is not material to its results of operations. In addition, there are certain other claims and legal proceedings pending against the Company for which accruals have not been established.

Eaton Vance Management, et al. v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, et al., Index No. 654397/2017, (Sup. Ct. N.Y. C’ty.).

On June 22, 2017, Eaton Vance Management and certain affiliated funds as well as Highland Capital Management and certain affiliated funds (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), filed a complaint in the New York State Supreme Court, Commercial Division, against the Company and WSFS, seeking, among other things, declarations that the July 13, 2017 Amendment to the Term Loan Facility was ineffective absent unanimous consent of all lenders under the facility, that certain of the Company’s actions with respect to certain of its intellectual property assets were taken in violation of the terms of the Term Loan Facility, and that those actions also constituted fraudulent conveyances.

On August 7, 2017, WSFS and the Company filed separate motions to dismiss certain of Plaintiffs’ claims for failure to state a claim and lack of standing, among other reasons. On September 7, 2017, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in the New York State Supreme Court, Commercial Division, against the Company and WSFS. The amended complaint continued to assert claims for breach of the terms of the Term Loan Facility, and for fraudulent conveyance and added an additional claim for fraudulent inducement against the Company.

In response to the amended complaint, WSFS and the Company withdrew their prior motions to dismiss and, on October 20, 2017, filed renewed motions seeking dismissal in whole or part. Among other things, the Company sought dismissal of the amended complaint for failure to state a claim, lack of standing, and because its fraud claims are duplicative of Plaintiffs’ claims under the documents governing the Term Loan Facility. Plaintiffs filed an omnibus brief on December 1, 2017 opposing the motions to dismiss. The Company and WSFS each filed reply briefs on December 22, 2017 reiterating that the majority of Plaintiffs’ claims should be dismissed as a matter of law.

Oral argument on the motions to dismiss occurred on March 8, 2018. On April 25, 2018, the judge issued a Memorandum Decision and Order, which granted the Company’s partial motion to dismiss in its entirety and dismissed as a matter of law the majority of Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs’ sole remaining claim is for breach of contract based on the theory that the July 13, 2017 Amendment to the Term Loan Facility required unanimous consent of all lenders under the facility.

On October 25, 2018, Highland Capital Management and certain affiliated funds were dismissed from the action with prejudice.

On November 21, 2018, the remaining Plaintiffs filed a limited appeal of the judge’s April 25, 2018 Memorandum Decision and Order with the First Department of the New York Appellate Division in an attempt to resuscitate their fraudulent conveyance claim. The Company filed an opposition brief on February 14, 2019, arguing that the trial court properly dismissed the fraudulent conveyance claim. On March 8, 2019, the remaining Plaintiffs filed a reply brief in support of their appeal. Oral argument on the appeal occurred on April 2, 2019. On April 25, 2019, the First Department unanimously affirmed the trial court’s decision to dismiss the fraudulent conveyance claim with prejudice.

Discovery in the action is ongoing. The Company believes that the remaining claim is wholly without merit, and intends to vigorously oppose the claim.

J CREW GROUP INC 10-Q