Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Note 4. Commitments and Contingencies In March 2017, the Company received a letter from the County of Santa Clara, California, which claimed that the Company is delinquent on its property taxes relating to tax year 1988/1989 in the amount of $80,238.07 including penalties which should be paid immediately. The Company believes that these property taxes were related to the period prior to the filing of the reorganization of the Company under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California on November 22, 1988 and the eventual confirmation of the Company’s Amended Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) by the Bankruptcy Court on May 17, 1990, and thus have been settled in accordance with the terms of the Plan and are therefore invalid. The Company has informed the County of Santa Clara that if it wants to assert its claim, it would have to petition to the Bankruptcy Court for relief. The Company does not recognize the said claim and therefore has not recorded any tax liabilities related to this claim. If the County of Santa Clara claim is adjudicated to be valid and the Company is liable, the tax liabilities imposed could have a material effect on the Company’s result of operations and financial position.

Commitments and Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2019

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Note 4. Commitments and Contingencies

In March 2017, the Company received a letter from the County of Santa Clara, California, which claimed that the Company is delinquent on its property taxes relating to tax year 1988/1989 in the amount of $80,238.07 including penalties which should be paid immediately. The Company believes that these property taxes were related to the period prior to the filing of the reorganization of the Company under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California on November 22, 1988 and the eventual confirmation of the Company’s Amended Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) by the Bankruptcy Court on May 17, 1990, and thus have been settled in accordance with the terms of the Plan and are therefore invalid. The Company has informed the County of Santa Clara that if it wants to assert its claim, it would have to petition to the Bankruptcy Court for relief. The Company does not recognize the said claim and therefore has not recorded any tax liabilities related to this claim. If the County of Santa Clara claim is adjudicated to be valid and the Company is liable, the tax liabilities imposed could have a material effect on the Company’s result of operations and financial position.

INTERDYNE CO 10-Q