UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016~~ 2017

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 000-54368

ROI LAND INVESTMENTS LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

Nevada

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

26-1574051

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1002 Sherbrooke West, Suite 1430, Montreal, Quebec H3A 3L6

(Address of principal executive offices)

Tel: 514-416-4764

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common stock, par value $0.0001

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (~~ss.~~ § 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). ~~Yes o No x~~

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

	Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
	Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

OnAs of ~~June~~November 309, ~~2016~~2018, ~~the~~there ~~last~~were ~~day of registrant’s most recently completed second quarter~~55,901,042 ~~the~~shares ~~aggregate market value~~ of the ~~Series A Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the~~ ~~registrant~~Company’s ~~was~~par value $30.20001 ~~million. For purposes of this response, the registrant has assumed its directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of 5% or more of its~~ Series A Common Stock ~~are deemed affiliates of the registrant~~outstanding.

As of December 28, 2017, there were 53,971,846 shares of the Company’s par value $0.0001 Series A Common Stock outstanding.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements." Forward-looking statements may include our statements regarding our goals, beliefs, strategies, objectives, plan, including product and service developments, future financial conditions, results or projections or current expectations. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "estimates," "intends," "plan" "expects," "may," "will," "should," "predicts," "anticipates," "continues," or "potential," or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We remind readers that forward- looking statements are merely predictions and therefore inherently subject to uncertainties and other factors and involve known and unknown risks that could cause the actual results, performance, levels of activity, or our achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, levels of activity, or our achievements, or industry results, expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements appear in Item 1 - "Business" and Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," as well as elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The factors discussed herein and expressed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission could cause actual results and developments to be materially different from those expressed in or implied by such statements. The forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this filing, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
ITEM 1.	Business	1
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	56
ITEM 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	56
ITEM 2.	Properties	6
ITEM 3.	Legal Proceedings	6
ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	67
PART II
ITEM 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	78
ITEM 6.	Selected Financial Data	911
ITEM 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1011
ITEM 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	1315
ITEM 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	1315
ITEM 9.	Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	1415
ITEM 9A.	Controls and Procedures	1415
ITEM 9B.	Other Information	1516
PART III
ITEM 10.	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	1617
ITEM 11.	Executive Compensation	1820
ITEM 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	2123
ITEM 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	2224
ITEM 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	2428
PART IV
ITEM 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	2529
	Signatures

PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

Organization

On December 13, 2007, ROI Land Investments Ltd. (“we”, “the Company”, “ROI”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada under the name of Conex MD, Inc. We were engaged in the business of providing specialized healthcare staffing to small and medium sized businesses. The Company had recruited healthcare professionals on assignments of varied duration and in permanent positions with clients in the United States. The services included hiring administration, information technology, sales and at the executive level.

On September 17, 2013, Lamar Investment Ltd (“Lamar”) purchased 5,000,000 shares of restricted common stock of Conex MD, Inc., representing 59% of the shares in the Company, from its then two Directors, Dr. Jacob Bar Ilan and Dr. Ely Steinberg for $230,000 in cash. On September 17, 2013, the shareholders of the Company elected two new Directors, Patrick Bragoli and Sebastien Cliche. On October 28, 2013, FINRA gave final approval to the name change to ROI Land Investments Ltd. and assigned the ticker symbol to ROII to better reflect the new direction of the Company. Subsequently, on May 19, 2014, Mr. Bragoli resigned as Director. On August 19, 2014, the shareholders of the Company elected Robert Boisjoli and Sami Chaouch to the board of directors. Mr. Boisjoli resigned as director on September 24, 2015 and Philippe Germain was appointed to fill the vacancy on September 25, 2015. Each of Messrs. Cliche, Chaouch and Germain were elected by the shareholders of the Company at the Company’s Annual Meeting on November 9, 2015.

We are a ~~land~~real estate development company ~~that owns~~ ~~and~~primarily ~~operates~~focused ~~businesses~~ in ~~the~~ land development ~~industry~~. The Company's business model consists of acquiring attractive land, optimizing zoning restrictions, obtaining necessary permits, outsourcing developments of the infrastructure and profiting from the sale of the subdivided land units to established residential and commercial building developers. We ~~may~~ also ~~opportunistically~~engage ~~consider real~~in ~~estate~~select opportunities which involve property development. Our mission is to maximize our return on investment within the land development sector inwith ~~North~~a ~~America as~~primary ~~well~~focus asin ~~internationally~~North America. These investments ~~and/or acquisitions~~ may be directly ~~acquired~~made directly by our Company or ~~via~~through qualified ~~Joint Venture~~joint ~~Partners.~~venture ~~Alternatively,~~partners ~~our~~in ~~Company,~~the ~~for~~form of ~~practical~~debt ~~purposes,~~or ~~functions~~equity ~~as a land banking firm~~investments. We strive to maintain the utmost respect of the environment, particularly by emphasizing and preserving more green spaces than the local laws require.

On November 15, 2013, the Company organized ROI DEV Canada Inc. (“ROI DEV”), a Canada Chart corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. ROI DEV was organized to acquire and manage land acquisitions in North America.

On ~~November~~October 317, ~~2015~~2014, the Company ~~organized~~formed ~~9497846~~1016566 ~~Canada~~B.C. ~~Inc~~Ltd. (“~~9497846~~1016566 ~~Canada~~B.C.”), a British Columbia (Canada) corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. ~~9497846~~of ~~Canada~~ROI ~~was organized~~DEV. to1016566 ~~provide~~B.C. ~~management~~was ~~services~~formed to own the Company’s ~~operating~~acquired ~~companies.~~properties Atlocated ~~December 31,~~in ~~2015,~~British ~~the subsidiary was still inactive~~Columbia.

On ~~January~~November 243, ~~2016~~2015, the Company ~~organized~~formed ~~ROI~~9497846 ~~Land~~Canada ~~Investments~~Inc. FZ (“~~ROI~~9497846 FZCanada”), a ~~UAE~~Canada corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. of ROI FZDEV. 9497846 Canada was ~~organized~~formed to ~~acquire and~~provide ~~manage~~management ~~land~~services ~~acquisitions~~to ~~and~~the ~~development~~Company’s operating companies but was dissolved in ~~Dubai~~April 2018.

On January 24, 2016, the Company formed ROI Land Investments FZ (“ROI FZ”), a UAE corporation as a wholly-owned subsidiary. ROI FZ was formed to acquire and manage land acquisitions and property developments in Dubai.

On March 17, 2016, the Company formed ROI Land Investments AG (“ROI Swiss”), a Swiss corporation. ROI Swiss was formed for the purpose of providing investor relations services to the Company’s investors and potential investors in Europe but was dissolved in May 2017.

On March 18, 2016, the Board of Directors increased the number of its members from 3 to 5 and appointed Slim Feriani and Martin Scholz to fill the vacancies created by such increase. The Company also appointed Slim Feriani as Executive Vice President- Finance and Investments and Chief Financial Officer and Martin Scholz as Executive Vice President.

On March 23, 2016, the Company organized ROI Securitization SA, a Luxembourg corporation as a wholly-owned subsidiary. ROI Securitization SA was organized to sell debt securities in Europe to fund the Company’s land and real estate projects.1

On March 23, 2016, the Company formed ROI Securitisation SA (“ROI SEC”), a Luxembourg corporation as a wholly-owned subsidiary. ROI Securitisation SA was formed to sell debt securities in Europe to fund the Company’s land and real estate projects.

On April 1, 2016, the Company formed 93391993 Quebec Inc. (“93391993 Quebec”), a Quebec (Canada) corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROI DEV. 93391993 Quebec was intended to become the entity to directly own the Company’s property in Beauport, Quebec, however the transfer of the property has yet to be completed.

On April 5, 2016, the Board of Directors appointed Sami Chaouch as Chief Executive Officer and Sebastien Cliche as Co-President and Chief Operating Officer. Philippe Germain, who previously served as the Company’s President was appointed to serve as Co-President.

On May 27, 2016, Philippe Germain resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company.

On August 2, 2016, Slim Feriani resigned from the Board of Directors and from his position as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. The Board of Directors appointed Mohsen Maaouia as the interim Chief Financial Officer to replace Slim Feriani.

On August 22, 2016, the Board of Directors of elected Sebastien Cliche to serve as President of the Company. Sebastien Cliche previously served as Co-President of the Company. Philippe Germain resigned from his position as Co-President of the Company.

On November 2, 2016, ROI DEV entered into an agreement to become a general partner to a French-registered limited partnership under the name ROI Land Colorado et New York Soho (“ROI SCA”). Martin Scholz, Stéphane Boivin and Sebastien Cliche are the nominated directors to ROI SCA.

On November 10, 2016, Martin Scholz resigned from the Board of Directors and from his position as Executive Vice President of the Company.

On April 18, 2017, the Board of Directors increased the number of its members from 2 to 3 and reappointed Martin Scholz to fill the vacancy created by such increase and nominated to the position of Executive Vice President of the Company. Stéphane Boivin has been appointed as Chief Operating Officer, and Antoine Tronquoy will serve as the new Chief Financial Officer of the Company, replacing Mohsen Maaouia.

On May 18, 2017, Sami Chaouch resigned from his position as Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Upon his resignation, Mr. Chaouch surrendered to the Company 100,000 shares of the Series A preferred stock held by him and such shares were canceled by the Company. In connection with the Company’s settlement agreement with Sami Chaouch, the Company agreed to issue 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series B preferred stock, however, the Company has not yet issued such shares. On the same date, the Chief Executive Officer position was replaced by Martin Scholz.

On August 10, 2017, Antoine Tronquoy resigned as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. On that same date the Company engaged Yuhi Horiguchi to serve as its new Chief Financial Officer. Yuhi Horiguchi is the controlling shareholder of Alternative Strategy Partners Pte. Ltd.

On October 3, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the re-issuance of the 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to Martin Scholz, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. These shares had been redeemed by the Company from Sami Chaouch on May 18, 2017. Sebastien Cliche resigned from his position as President of the Company.

On December 29, 2017, Sebastien Cliche resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors. The remaining two directors of the Company have decided not to fill the vacancy to the Board created by Mr. Cliche’s.

On February 6, 2018 the Company’s Board of Directors increased the number of its members from 2 to 3 by appointing Yuhi Horiguchi to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Sebastien Cliche on December 29, 2017.

On February 22, 2018, Mr. Stéphane Boivin resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors. On February 27, 2018, Mr. Peter Hoffmann was appointed as a new Director of the Company to fill the vacancy created by Mr. Boivin and will also replace Mr. Martin Scholz as the Company’s new Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Boivin was also removed from his role as Chief Operating Officer and from his directorship positions held in the Company’s subsidiaries, namely ROI DEV Canada Inc., ROI Securitisation SA and ROI Land Investments FZ.

On February 26, 2018, the Company appointed Ms. Claudia Nelke as Vice President of Administration.

On March 21, 2018, the Company formed HLST 1 Holding Limited (“HLST1”), a Dubai UAE company, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. On July 11, 2018, the Company also formed IN AWS Holding Limited (“IN AWS”), a Dubai UAE company, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Both HLST1 and IN AWS were formed to hold the Company’s equity interest in FL2 Holdings Limited (“FL2”), a Dubai UAE company, which shall own and develop the Swarovski Towers building in Dubai.

On May 22, 2018, Yuhi Horiguchi resigned as the Company’s Director and will remain with his position as Chief Financial Officer. On that same date the Company appointed Marshall Scott Vayer as a Director to fill the board vacancy created by Mr. Horiguchi, and also appointed Mr. Vayer to act as the Company’s Executive Vice President.

On July 14, 2018, the Company formed ROI Group Management S.à.r.l., a Luxembourg limited liability company, as a wholly-owned subsidiary, and on July 25, 2018 the Company formed ROI Meatpacking SCS (ROI Mepa SCS), a Luxembourg limited partnership, as a 90%-owned subsidiary, whereby the remaining 10% is held by certain directors and officers of ROI and its subsidiaries. ROI Mepa SCS was formed to hold the Company’s interest in the New York City Meatpacking Project (Refer to Note 13 Subsequent Events) and ROI Group Management S.à.r.l. was formed to act as the general partner and manager of ROI Mepa SCS.

On July 24, 2018, Marc-André Lévesque who currently serves as the Company’s Management Consultant of North America was appointed as Vice President of Project Development – North America.

General

ROI operates in the ~~land~~business ~~development~~of ~~sub-sector~~real estate ~~niche~~development ofwith ~~the~~a ~~real~~primary ~~estate~~focus ~~industry,~~in land development where its main activity consists of acquiring, zoning and converting raw land into a construction-ready developed site. The land development process implemented by ROI consists of four phases:

Land acquisition - Purchasing land ready for development, in a strategic location and without any prohibited zoning restrictions.

Permits applications - Executed within the local municipalities to effectuate the legal right for current and future infrastructures development

Infrastructures - Outsourcing to qualified experts of the necessary technical and construction work.

Profit taking - Final sale of the licensed, zoned and (by now) subdivided and construction-ready land unit to established regional residential developers.

ROI’s mission is to acquire, ~~fund and~~finance and service land and ~~real~~property ~~estate~~ development opportunities. We strive to become a leader in ~~green~~ land development globally by maintaining ~~the~~ the utmost respect of the environment, particularly by emphasizing and preserving more green spaces than the local laws require.

Market Opportunity

ROI has developed several compelling reasons for market and industry success:

Experienced management team

Over 70 years of combined real estate development experience

- Over ~~1000~~1,000 combined lots developed in the past 10 years by the team

Strategic network of construction companies, financial institutions and owners of large available land tracts

Ability to promptly identify and close land acquisitions

Ability to manage complex transactions

Prime Location Selection focusing on attractive markets for profit taking through land development:

Canada: Quebec and British Columbia

United States: Colorado

Europe: French Riviera

- UAE: Dubai

Current Projects

We currently have the following real estate projects under development:

Beauport, QC

This project is a low density project in Beauport, a city in the suburbs of Quebec. ~~No other parcel of land is available in this strategic sector of the city. There are already 3 building contractors interested in reserving lands on this parcel.~~ The main roads are 2 km away from the project and all services, including a shopping center, restaurants, grocery store, clinic, primary school and high school etc. are less than 1 km away. The projects will consist of townhouses, semi- detached and standard houses. ~~Infrastructures~~whereby ~~will~~the beCompany ~~necessary~~plans ~~and~~to ~~are~~develop ~~included~~lots inafter conversion to residential zoning. Since the ~~budget.~~Company Nohas experienced unexpected delays in zoning conversion, no significant development of this property occurred during the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we have invested $45,~~724~~069,~~686~~ 324 (CAD 6,~~362~~363,780) in the property.

Terrace, BC

Terrace is a city on the Skeena River in ~~British~~ British Columbia, Canada. The Terrace region was a booming market in 2015 because of the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) projects underway. Companies invested hundreds of millions of dollars in advanced work in order to be prepared for LNG. We had decided to participate in this opportunity by buying lands on which we expect to build apartments as the Terrace region had a lack of available housing and a strong need to house their employees. Stemming from the significant decline in global oil and gas prices in 2016, many LNG projects across British Columbia were delayed or discontinued and as such, housing demands in this region also rapidly diminished. No significant development of these properties occurred during the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, however, at the end of year 2017, new discussions about restarting the largest LNG project by the end of 2018 have risen and should the project be reactivated, thousands of domestic jobs could be created, combined with a boom in residential construction in both Kitimat and Terrace.

We currently own three properties in Terrace with a total cost to date of $1,~~602~~719,~~875~~526 (CAD 2,158,608).

Kitimat, BC

The Kitimat region was booming due to the ~~LNG~~ LNG projects underway. Companies have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in advanced work in order to be prepared for the ~~LNG~~ LNG projects. Accordingly, this region experienced a severe lack of infrastructure and single family dwellings needed to house ~~their~~ their workers. Investments have been made into this region to help strengthen the local community and to create economic advantages ~~for~~ for future generations of British Columbians. We incurred $50,000 of development costs on this property during the year ended December 31, 2015. Stemming from the significant decline in global oil and gas prices in 2016, many LNG projects across British Columbia were delayed or discontinued and as such, housing demands in this region also rapidly diminished. No significant development of these properties occurred during the year ended December 31, 2017, however, at the end of year 2017, new discussions about restarting the largest LNG project by the end of 2018 have risen and should the project be reactivated, thousands of domestic jobs could be created, combined with a boom in residential construction in both Kitimat and Terrace.

We acquired approximately 250,000 square ~~feet~~ feet of prime residential land development to build over 300 apartment units. To date, we have invested $1,~~673~~795,~~366~~147 (CAD 2,253,540) in in the property in Kitimat.

Louisette, France

Louisette is located in Seyne sur Mer, Var, South of France. The land is less than 5 minutes from the Six-Fours beach, which is a region rich in tourism. We are co- investing on this project with Rome Finance Group and Capital Evolution Group SAS. As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we own 2% of the project through an investment in shares of Society Louisette Memories SARL.

Evans, Colorado

The town of Evans is located in Weld County, 60 miles from Denver, Colorado. Evans has a growing economy fueled by large oil & gas companies, investors and agriculture. The technology, aerospace, construction, financial and health care sectors are also prominent in Evans with continued hiring and job opportunities. Job creation, strong population growth and a continued influx of new residents and businesses to the area have led to an increased demand for housing in Evans. According to the Department of Labor, Weld County has seen the strongest job growth of any county in the U.S. from June 2013 to June 2014, the last period for which data is available.

3We acquired 220 acres (equivalent to 9,583,200 square feet of land) and 763 water rights in Evans. As of December 31, 2017, we have invested $6,717,876 in the property in Evans and have incurred an additional $2,518,008 in development costs. Beginning in 2018, ROI commenced its development of approximately 1,078 lots in approximately five phases. The project will entail developing the land infrastructure and obtaining necessary zoning for a mix of housing units, including single family homes, town homes, duplexes and condos. The Company also plans to develop lots for a community club house as well as commercial and retail areas. A new middle school was opened in fall of 2015 adjacent to the property and a new private hospital was constructed and opened in mid-2017, which are expected to further fuel demand for quality housing.

We acquired 220 acres (equivalent to 9,583,200 square feet of land) and 763 water rights in Evans. As of December 31, 2016, we have invested $6,717,876 in the property in Evans and have incurred an additional $1,029,944 in development costs. Beginning in 2018 and in affiliation with a local construction company(s), ROI intends to develop approximately 950 lots in approximately four phases. The project will feature a mix of housing units, including single family homes, town homes, duplexes and condos. The Company also plans to build a park as well as commercial and retail areas. A new middle school was opened last fall adjacent to the property, which is expected to further fuel demand for quality housing.

Sobha Hartland, Dubai, UAE

Sobha Hartland is a mixed-use development that is located in Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum City. It affords a full view of the Dubai skyline and it is conveniently located close to the metro, the water canal, in front of the Dubai Design District and only minutes from downtown via Al Khail artery road. This complete community offers high net worth residents of Dubai a chance to reduce their commuting drive from 20-25 km to 3 km or 5 minutes to downtown. Dubai is among the fastest growing cities in the world. It is a major financial center and business hub for the Middle East and Africa. Dubai’s economy is fueled by a number of industries including tourism, finance, industrial consulting and communication technologies.

We have partnered with Sobha LLC, a subsidiary of PNC Investments LLC (“PNC”), for this project. Sobha LLC is a large and fully integrated developer in the region having developed 450 projects in the Middle East and Europe. On February 7, 2016, our wholly-owned subsidiary, ROI Land Investments FZ, entered into a Development Sale and Purchase Agreement with PNC for the purchase of approximately 433,000 square feet of land in Sobha Hartland. The total acquisition price is $29,488,000 (AED 108,281,250). This project features three, eight-story buildings for a total of 300 units. Each building offers Dubai residents with a variety of luxurious housing options including studio apartments, 1-bedroom apartments, 2-bedroom apartments, 3-bedroom apartments, two bedroom duplexes and three bedroom duplexes.

On May 15, 2016, the Company received a ~~termination~~ termination letter from PNC terminating the agreement dated February 7, 2016 for non-payment of the amounts due under the agreement. As a result, the Company forfeited the $4,701,205 (AED 17,271,099) of deposits. A total of $5,048,032 (AED 18,545,258), including $346,827 (AED 1,273,583) of closing and development costs, has been charged to operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 as abandoned project costs. However, the Company is still in negotiations with PNC to acquire a reduced size and price of the land it had agreed to under the agreement dated February 7, 2016 and apply the deposits to this restructured arrangement. Negotiations are under way, but the likelihood that the Company will be successful in reaching a satisfactory agreement is dependent on its ability to pay at least a portion of the new acquisition price. As a result, there can be no assurance that the acquisition will occur as contemplated or at all. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company also incurred $273,048 of other costs related to the project and wrote-off leasehold improvements related to a lease in Dubai for an amount of $299,475. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not incur any additional costs relating to this project.

~~Project~~Swarovski ~~Funding~~Towers, ~~Activity~~Dubai, UAE

On ~~June~~December 1722, ~~2014~~2017, ~~ROI~~the ~~DEV~~Company entered into a ~~Framework~~ Design & Licensing Agreement with ~~Coast~~Swarovski toBrand ~~Coast~~License ~~Holdings,~~AG ~~Inc.~~ (“~~CTC~~Swarovski”), awhich ~~Canadian~~provides ~~Construction corporation. Under~~ the ~~terms~~Company ~~of the agreement,~~with ~~ROI~~an ~~DEV~~exclusive ~~will~~license ~~provide~~to ~~funding~~design and to ~~CTC~~develop in the ~~form~~Swarovski ofTowers ~~notes~~building ~~payable~~in ~~and~~the ~~mortgage~~Dubai ~~notes~~(United ~~payable~~Arab ~~for~~Emirates) ~~property~~territory. ~~development projects,~~The ~~and~~Company ~~provide~~plans ~~financial~~to ~~and~~develop ~~real~~the ~~estate~~world’s ~~advisory~~first ~~services,~~luxury ~~for~~hotel aand ~~period~~residential ofproperty uprevealing ~~to ten years. ROI DEV has~~ the ~~right~~exceptional tostandards ~~make the loan~~of orhigh-quality ~~not~~design and ~~each~~decor ~~individual~~of ~~loan~~the ~~will~~Swarovski bebrand. ~~evidenced~~The byCompany ~~its~~is ~~own~~currently ~~promissory~~in ~~note~~discussions with ~~terms~~project ~~agreed~~partners ~~upon~~to byachieve its ~~the~~plans ~~parties.~~to Onlaunch ~~December 31, 2014,~~ the ~~Framework~~project ~~Agreement~~by ~~was~~the ~~cancelled;~~end ~~however,~~of ~~existing~~year ~~and additional loans were made~~2018.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a mortgage note receivable outstanding with CTC for $154,994 (CAD 215,000). The note bears interest at 8% and was due on the earlier of (i) December 30, 2015 or (ii) the date upon which the subject property is sold by CTC. The mortgage note is in default at December 31, 2015; however, it is collateralized by a mortgage on the property. During the year ended December 31, 2016, CTC defaulted on the mortgage note and therefore the note receivable was impaired. Management believes that the recoverability of this amount is less than probable. The Company initiated the process to activate the mortgage and seize the underlying land. While the Company believes that it will successfully hold ownership of the subject property, there is no probable assurance regarding the timing of such outcome. Therefore, the subject property has not been recorded as real estate under development and sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.5

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company assumed a second mortgage note due to a related party by CTC and CTC agreed to reimburse the Company for the full amount of the mortgage and accrued interest due thereon. The loan bears interest at 6% per annum and is due April 13, 2016. The amount of the mortgage loan due from CTC at December 31, 2015 is $288,360 (CAD 400,000). During the year ended December 31, 2016, CTC defaulted on the mortgage note and therefore the note receivable was impaired. Management believes that the recoverability of this amount is less than probable. The Company initiated the process to activate the mortgage and seize the underlying land. While the Company believes that it will successfully hold ownership of the subject property, there is no probable assurance regarding the timing of such outcome. Therefore, the subject property has not been recorded as real estate under development and sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.

On December 31, 2015, the Company had an unsecured note receivable outstanding with CTC for $630,788 (CAD 875,000). The note bears interest at 8%, was due December 30, 2015 and is in default as of December 31, 2015. The funding from the note was used for the development and construction on the property for which the Company has two mortgage notes receivable. The property consists of six townhomes which are substantially complete and currently held for sale by CTC. As CTC has not responded to requests for payment on the note and has not provided any evidence of the use of funds, the Company has established a full reserve on the collectability of the note receivable, and $52,986 (CAD 73,500) of accrued interest as of December 31, 2015. The Company is vigorously pursuing the collection of the note but has not been successful as of December 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company loaned CTC $1,012,237 (CAD 1,404,130) in the form of unsecured notes for the development of one of its properties. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum and were due December 30, 2015. The notes are in default at December 31, 2015. As CTC has not responded to requests for payment on the notes and has not provided any evidence of the use of funds, the Company has established a full reserve on the collectability of the notes receivable, and $56,162 (CAD 67,314) of accrued interest, as of December 31, 2015. The Company plans to vigorously pursue the collection of these notes. The Company is vigorously pursuing the collection of the note but has not been successful as of December 31, 2016.

Compliance with Government Regulation

The development of the Company’s projects is, and will continue to be, subject to various domestic, foreign, state, local, and/or federal laws and zoning regulations. Such laws and regulations are subject to legislative or administrative change at any time. Any changes in such laws and regulations may have material adverse effects on the Company’s sales, cash flow and cash position. The Company may be required to comply with all various regulations in order to complete its projects. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to comply with all applicable laws and regulations. Non-compliance may result in fines, sanctions or termination of the Company’s business in some localities, all of which will have material adverse effects on the Company’s sales, cash flow and cash position.

Intellectual Property

We have not filed for any protection of our name or “mark”; however, we intend to do so and shall strive to protect our proprietary financial model through available domestic and foreign laws.

Employees

We currently have seven full-time ~~and two part-time~~ employees. We use the services of numerous consultants to provide day-to-day and project based duties.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not required by smaller reporting companies.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our executive offices are located at 1002 Sherbrooke West, Suite 1430 Montreal, Quebec H3A 3L6. This office is approximately 1,951 square feet in size. The lease will expire on February 20, 2020 and requires monthly rent of $2,209 (CAD 2,926).

The Company ~~leases~~leased an office in Stuttgart, Germany., ~~This~~which ~~office~~was is approximately 1,100 square feet. The lease ~~expired on March 31, 2016, and was extended to June 30, 2016, and~~ requires a monthly rental of $5,500 (EUR 5,056) and expired on June 30, 2016. The Company, through its subsidiary ROI DEV, entered into a new lease agreement for an office in Nuertingen, Germany. The office is approximately 1,334 square feet in size. The lease expires on September 30, 2021, and requires a monthly rental of $1,159 (EUR 1,100) for the first year which increases to $1,201 (EUR 1,140) for the fifth year.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

On August 6, 2015, Mrs. Gloria Julie Couillard and Tekno Forme (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint naming Coast to Coast Holding Ltd. (“CTC”), its President, ROI DEV, Philippe Germain and Sebastian Cliche as co-defendants claiming unpaid fees of $207,638. On September 2, 2015, a default judgement was served against CTC. CTC and its President are applying to set aside the default judgement against them and the Company is opposing the Plaintiff’s notice of Application. On October 9, 2015, the Plaintiff registered a lien on the Company’s Canadian properties in the amount of $207,638. On March 17, 2017, the Plaintiff agreed to release its judgment filed against the Company’s Canadian properties and removed its lien, in its entirety, registered on ~~the~~ these properties.

On September 14, 2015, the Company received a notification from the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) of a Request for Mediation, dated September 8, 2015, filed by Seth Shaw, pursuant to a mediation and arbitration clause contained in a Consulting Agreement allegedly entered into between the Company and Seth Shaw on May 1, 2014. The Company executed such agreement but believes that Seth Shaw failed to perform under said agreement. Mr. Shaw believes that the agreement is valid and in effect. The matter under dispute is 500,000 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock which were to be issued to Mr. Shaw pursuant to such agreement. A certificate for such shares was issued but never delivered to Mr. Shaw, because the Company cancelled the Agreement for failure to perform. The Company cancelled the shares and recorded a liability for the then value of the shares of $175,000 which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. The Company and Mr. Shaw met in mediation on February 22, 2016 with no resolution achieved. The parties then attended an arbitration evidentiary hearing on January 20, 2017 whereby the arbitrator, on March 30, 2017, issued a final award ruling that Mr. Shaw was entitled to recover $755,125 from the Company for breach of contract claim and $103,110 of legal fees. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in judicial court from these claims by Mr. Shaw and has recorded a liability of $250,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, as being the best estimate of the possible outflows to settle this case.6

On September 14, 2015, the Company received a notification from the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) of a Request for Mediation, dated September 8, 2015, filed by Seth Shaw, pursuant to a mediation and arbitration clause contained in a Consulting Agreement allegedly entered into between the Company and Seth Shaw on May 1, 2014. The Company executed such agreement but believes that Seth Shaw failed to perform under said agreement. Mr. Shaw believes that the agreement is valid and in effect. The matter under dispute is 500,000 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock which were to be issued to Mr. Shaw pursuant to such agreement. A certificate for such shares was issued but never delivered to Mr. Shaw, because the Company cancelled the Agreement for failure to perform. The Company cancelled the shares and recorded a liability for the then value of the shares of $175,000 which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. The Company and Mr. Shaw met in mediation on February 22, 2016 with no resolution achieved. The parties then attended an arbitration evidentiary hearing on January 20, 2017 whereby a final arbitration award was issued on March 30, 2017 and subsequently a judgment was delivered by the United States District Court of Nevada on March 1, 2018 ruling that Mr. Shaw was entitled to recover $755,125 from the Company for breach of contract claim, $103,110 of legal fees and $3,625 in costs. On August 6, 2018, a Writ of Execution was issued to the US Marshal for the District of Nevada to enforce the judgment. Subsequent to such events, the officers of the Company and Mr. Shaw have engaged in continuing discussions with each other toward settlement of all outstanding matters between them. Mr. Shaw has voluntarily refrained from further enforcement action and the discussions with the Company are ongoing. The Company believes it will be able to eventually succeed in reaching voluntary arrangements for settlement of the outstanding judgment in favor of Mr. Shaw and to resume a mutually constructive and amicable business relationship. The Company has not revised the recorded liability of $250,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, as it still represents the best estimate of the possible outflows to settle this case.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, 1016566 B.C. Ltd. (“1016566 B.C.”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROI DEV, received a Notice of Civil Claim from Snaring River Holdings Ltd. dba Western Thermal & Demolition, a British Columbia construction subcontractor (“Snaring River”). 1016566 B.C. Ltd. is the record title owner of certain real property known as 1015-1050 Nalabila Boulevard, Kitimat, BC, Canada (the “ Kitimat Property”) and was acquired from CTC.. Snaring River claims to have performed work on the Property as a subcontractor for Intactus Corporation (“Inactus”), a Canadian corporation performing general contractor services, and Intactus allegedly was contracted by CTC to perform certain work on the Property. As a subcontractor on the Property, Snaring River filed and claimed certain rights pursuant to the British Columbia Lien Trust Law (“BCLTL”), comprising liens against the Property and claims to certain funds allegedly required to have been withheld in trust in its favor, pursuant to the BCLTL. Pursuant to such claims, Snaring River named 1016566 B.C. as a co-defendant with Intactus in Snaring River’s Notice of Civil Claim. Snaring River’s invoices for work at the Property were approximately $255,000 (CAD 320,000), without crediting any payments received. In a letter dated April 4, 2018, Snaring River claimed to add Company as a defendant in its Notice of Civil Claim by reason of Company’s indirect interest in the Property through intermediary subsidiaries. The Company does not believe (i) that the Company has derivative liability to Snaring River on account of actions/inactions of its subsidiary or affiliate entities, (ii) that the Company has direct liability to Snaring River, (iii) that Snaring River’s legal conclusions are supported by case law, or (iv) that the facts will support Snaring River’s allegations against the Company. Moreover, the Company does not believe Snaring River’s Notice of Civil Claim can or will prevail against 1016566 B.C. and has not recorded any liability on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.

A case was filed against the Company entitled, Timo Pfisterer, plaintiff-appellant, v. ROI Land Investments Ltd., defendant-appellee, in the Landesarbeitsgericht (Regional Labor Court) for Baden-Württemberg, 4th Chamber, Case number: 4 Sa 6/18 29 Ca 1854/17 ArbG Stuttgart. The subject of the litigation concerns a labor dispute brought by Mr. Pfisterer against the Company arising from activities in Europe. While the Company had secured judgment in its favor dismissing plaintiff’s claims, on oral hearing of August 15, 2018, the judgment in favor of the Company was reversed in favor of the plaintiff-appellant, Mr. Pfisterer. The reviewing court reversed and granted a decision in favor of plaintiff-appellant in an amount of approximately $1 million (subject to final determination of interest and costs allowances). The Company believes the subsequent decision is erroneous, that Company has meritorious defenses, and that it has a path to review. Upon the advice of German counsel, the Company believes that on review the decision of the Regional Labor Court is more likely than not to be reversed on grounds of error. The Company is seeking such review at this time and has not recorded any liability on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.

On September 18, 2018, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) commenced an administrative proceeding, In the Matter of Avant Diagnostics, Inc., et al., (File No. 3-18784), in which it seeks, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to revoke the registration of each class of securities of Respondent (ROI Land Investments, Ltd.) that are registered pursuant to Exchange Act Section 12. The basis alleged for the proceeding was the Company’s delinquent period filings and period reporting with the SEC. At this time the Enforcement Division of the SEC has joined in a joint motion with the Company to stay the administrative proceeding pending signing and submission of a proposed settlement in which the Company will consent to the entry of an order revoking the registration of such securities. The Company intends to enter into consent without admitting or denying the findings contained in the order, except as to the SEC’s jurisdiction.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not Applicable.

PART II

Market Information

As the Company is a “smaller reporting company,” it is not required to provide the performance graph required in paragraph (e) of Item 201 of Regulation S-K.

Our Series A common stock is not listed on an established public trading market, but is quoted by the OTC Markets Group, Inc., in the non-NASDAQ over the counter market. The symbol for our common stock is ROII. The following table sets forth the closing prices, for the fiscal quarters indicated, as quoted by OTC Markets Group, Inc., and reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark up, mark down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2016				For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
	For the Year Ended December 31, 2017				For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
	High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter	$	10.5011	$	0.4110	$	31.1050	$	10.7041
Second Quarter	$	0.8505	$	0.0704	$	30.0085	$	20.8007
Third Quarter	$	0.1715	$	0.0305	$	20.9517	$	20.0103
Fourth Quarter	$	0.1714	$	0.0513	$	20.5017	$	10.0005

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company’s common stock was held by ~~200~~198 shareholders of record.

Our authorized capital stock consists of 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001, and 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share of which 160,000,000 shares are Series A voting common stock and 40,000,000 shares are Series B non-voting common stock.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, 53,~~971~~501,846 shares of Series A common stock were issued and ~~outstanding and~~ no shares of Series B common stock was issued ~~or outstanding~~. The holders of our common stock:

	•	have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available if and when declared by our board of directors;

	•	are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs;

•

do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights; and

The holders of Series A common stock are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which stockholders may vote while holders of Series B common stock have no voting rights.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company’s Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock were held of record by two and 14 shareholders, respectively.

The Series A preferred stock is identical to the common stock of the Company, except that each share of the 200,000 Series A Preferred Stock has 150 votes per share instead of the one vote per share of the Series A common stock.

The Series B preferred stock is identical to the Company’s common stock, except that each share of the Series B preferred stock has the following features:

(1)

The Series B preferred stock shall not be convertible into the Company’s common stock unless and until (i) a class of the Company's capital stock commences trading upon the U.S. NASDAQ trading system (the "NASDAQ Uplisting"), or (ii) the Company notifies the holders of the Series B preferred stock that their shares may be converted into common stock (whether or not the NASDAQ Uplisting has then yet occurred); after which time the Series B preferred stock shall be convertible as and to the extent set forth below.

(2)	When any shares of Series B preferred stock are converted into common stock, they shall be converted at the rate of three (3) shares of common stock for the "Effective Value" (defined below) of each of the Series B preferred stock.

(3)

The Series B preferred stock shall accumulate dividends at the rate of 8% per annum, prorated for partial years, such that, at the time of its conversion, every share of Series B preferred stock shall convert at a rate (the "Effective Value") computed by adding to it the cumulative value of its accumulated dividends. For example, if ten shares of the Series B preferred stock have been held for two years and six months, when they are converted into common stock they each will have an Effective Value of 1.20 shares, and collectively an Effective Value of 12 shares. Since each share of Series B preferred stock converts into three shares of common stock, all ten shares will convert into 36 shares of common stock. Upon conversion, no fractional shares of common stock shall be issued, but rather fractional common stock shares shall be settled in cash.

(4)

If the purchaser of Series B preferred stock is an existing holder of the common stock, then the Company may at its discretion extend to any such purchaser the option to pay for some or all of the purchase price of the Series B preferred stock by means of submitting to the Company to be held in treasury some of such holder's shares of common stock, at a valuation to be determined by the Company's Board of Directors in their sole but reasonable discretion.

We refer you to our Amended Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and the applicable statutes of the State of Nevada for a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our securities.

The Company’s transfer agent is Empire Stock & Transfer Agency of Henderson, Nevada.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid dividends on our common stock since our formation, and we do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Declaration or payment of dividends, if any, in the future, will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our then current financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. There are no contractual restrictions on our ability to declare or pay dividends.

Penny Stock

Our common stock is considered to be a "penny stock" under the rules the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market System, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or quotation system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission, that:

· contains a description of the nature and level of risks in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; · contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of Securities' laws; contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; · contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; · defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and · contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type, size and format, as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation.

8· contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of Securities' laws; contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price;

	·	contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions;

	·	defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and

contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type, size and format, as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with:

· bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; · the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; · the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the marker for such stock; and · monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.

the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction;

	·	the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the marker for such stock; and

monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.

In addition, the penny stock rules that require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgement of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitably statement.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our stock.

Related Stockholder Matters

None.

Purchase of Equity Securities

On May 9, 2016, the Company issued 100,000 shares of Series A preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share to each of Sami Chaouch and Sebastien Cliche against receipt from each of them of 100,000 shares of Series A Common Stock held by them. No additional consideration was provided to the Company for the Series A Preferred Stock. These shares held in treasury will be used for future option exercises or for future conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

During the ~~period~~year ~~from~~ended ~~April 1, 2016 through~~ December 31, 2016, the Company also purchased from thirteen accredited investors a total of 1,889,226 shares of its Series A common stock and received $0.20 in cash for each share of Series A common stock purchased in exchange for 1,889,226 shares of its Series B preferred stock newly issued. These shares held in treasury will be used for future option exercises or for future conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

On March 23, 2017, the Company canceled the subscription for a total of 220,327 Series A common shares previously made by Martin Scholz and agreed to redeem such shares for $1.25 per share, or $275,000, by making a $200,000 payment in April 2017 and the balance in multiple payments through October 2017. The Series A common shares held by Mr. Scholz subsequent to such cancelation was 927,776 shares.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company also purchased from thirteen accredited investors a total of 1,008,930 shares of its Series A common stock and received $0.20 in cash for each share of Series A common stock purchased in exchange for 1,008,930 shares of its Series B preferred stock newly issued. These shares held in treasury will be used for future option exercises or for future conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

~~On May 9, 2016, the Company issued 100,000 shares of Series A preferred stock, par value $0~~None.0001 per share to each of Sami Chaouch and Sebastien Cliche against receipt from each of them of 100,000 shares of Series A Common Stock held by them. No additional consideration was provided to the Company for the Series A Preferred Stock.

~~On September 6, 2016, the Company issued 350,000 shares of its Series B preferred stock to an accredited investor for debt issuance costs at a fair value of $94,500.~~10

On September 27, 2016, the Company issued to thirteen accredited investors a total of 1,889,226 shares of Series B preferred stock in exchange for its Series A common stock and cash. The proceeds were used for working capital.

During the period from April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the Company received cash, net of cash issuance costs, of $573,915 for subscriptions for 1,129,556 shares of its Series B preferred stock from fourteen accredited investors. The shares have not been issued as of December 31, 2016. The proceeds will be used for working capital.

During the period from April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the Company received cash, net of issuance costs, of $2,161,714, for 3,845,226 shares of its common stock. The proceeds were used for working capital.

During the period from April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the Company received from twenty-three accredited investors subscriptions to purchase notes of the Company for $1,945,574 in cash, net of issuance costs. The terms of the notes have not yet been finalized. When completed, the proceeds will be used to fund the Company’s projects and for working capital.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

As the Company is a “smaller reporting company,” this item is inapplicable.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE RELATED NOTES THAT APPEAR ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT. THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT REFLECT OUR PLANS, ESTIMATES AND BELIEFS. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE DISCUSSED IN THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO SUCH DIFFERENCES INCLUDE THOSE DISCUSSED BELOW AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made in this report ~~may~~ may constitute “forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events ”. ~~These~~ These forward-looking statements involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions. These statements are based on our current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, other than as required by law. In light of these assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not occur and actual results and events may vary significantly from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Revenues

~~Revenues~~For ~~consist of interest income earned on notes receivable. Our revenues were $-0- for~~ the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, ~~compared~~we had tointerest ~~$119,523,~~income ~~net~~arising offrom aloans ~~reserve~~receivable from FL2 of $1543,~~749 for~~433. ~~uncollectible~~There ~~loans,~~was no revenue for the year ended December 31, ~~2015. Recognition of interest income for fiscal year~~ 2016 ~~was suspended as collectability was not reasonably assured~~.

Operating Expenses

For the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 our ~~total~~ total operating expenses were $176,~~232~~714,~~985~~271 compared to $1017,~~627~~232,~~265~~985 for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 resulting in ana ~~increase~~decrease ofby approximately $~~6,605,720~~10. 5 million. The ~~increase~~decrease in operating expenses primarily resulted from ana ~~increase~~substantial decrease in ~~abandoned~~consulting ~~project costs by approximately $5.2 million~~fees, ~~mostly~~professional ~~attributable~~fees toand ~~the~~travel ~~losses~~expenses ~~incurred~~by ona ~~the~~total ~~Company’s~~of ~~Sobha Hartland Dubai project as well as an increase in cash based consulting fees by~~ approximately $15.63 million asachieved ~~the~~through ~~Company~~our ~~had~~cost ~~two~~rationalization ~~additional~~initiatives beginning ~~executives~~from inmid-2017 ~~fiscal 2016~~ and ~~also~~in ~~retained~~avoiding ~~more third-party~~losses ~~consultants~~from ~~during~~abandoned ~~fiscal 2016 on existing and pipeline~~ projects. ~~Such~~(Sobha ~~increase~~Hartland ~~was~~Dubai) ~~partially~~such ~~offset~~as ~~by a decrease in~~ the ~~amount~~$5.6 ofmillion ~~loan~~ loss ~~provisions~~incurred in byfiscal ~~approximately $1~~2016.~~3 million.~~

Other income and expenses consisted of ~~interest~~ interest expense of $2,~~174~~712,~~615~~398, inforeign ~~2016~~currency ~~(2015:~~transaction losses of $1924,~~370,122)~~223 ~~offset~~in byfiscal ~~gains~~year on2017 ~~extinguishment~~and ofa ~~debt~~change in fair value of derivative liability amounting to $~~-0-~~37,000, inwhereas ~~2016~~we ~~(2015:~~reported interest expense of $832,~~449)~~174,615 and foreign currency transaction gains of $198,116 in fiscal year 2016. ~~(2015:~~The ~~$77,754)~~increase in interest expense was mainly related to accretion interest from an out-of-period adjustment.

As a result, net loss was $1910,~~209~~344,~~484~~ 459 for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 compared to $1119,~~716~~209,~~661~~484 for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Historically, we have financed our cash ~~flow~~ flow and operations from the sale of common stock and issuance of notes payable. Our principal use of funds during the years ended ~~December~~ December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 was for the ~~acquisition~~funding of ~~properties,~~development ~~the~~of ~~funding~~existing ~~for property~~ projects and ~~development, and~~ general corporate expenses.

~~Liquidity and Capital Resources during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015~~11

AsLiquidity ~~of December 31, 2016, we had cash of $557,972~~ and aCapital ~~deficit~~Resources induring ~~working capital of $18,463,156. We used cash in operations of $10,469,799 for~~ the year ended ~~December 31, 2016~~ ~~compared to negative cash flow from operations of $14,474,680 for the year ended~~ December 31, ~~2015.~~2017 ~~The~~compared ~~negative cash flow from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 is attributable~~ to the Company's net loss from operations of $19,209,484, unrealized foreign exchange gain of $599,429 and changes in operating assets and liabilities of $288,895, offset by amortization of $12,615, stock-based compensation of $2,282,285, stock issued for services of $53,200, amortization of debt issuance costs of $318,457, accretion of debt discount of $103,240, amortization of profit participation discount of $46,151, reserve for uncollectible loans of $501,529, write-off of acquisition deposits of $112,187 and abandoned project costs of $5,620,555. Cash used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 is attributable to the Company's net loss from operations of $11,716,661, gain on extinguishment of debt of $83,449 and changes in operating assets and liabilities of $7,406,189, offset by amortization of $12,696, stock-based compensation of $2,434,438, amortization of debt issuance costs of $340,784, accretion of debt discount of $102,958, and amortization of profit participation discount of $65,714, and reserve for uncollectible loans of $1,775,029.2016

~~Cash~~As ~~from~~of ~~investing~~December ~~activities~~31, 2017, we had cash of $2,129,740 and a deficit in working capital of $29,306,118. We used cash in operations of approximately $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to cash used in operations of approximately $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The ~~consisted~~cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 is mostly attributable to the Company's net loss from operations of approximately $~~164~~10.3 million,~~023~~ net change in working capital of ~~repayment~~approximately $1.9 million, partially offset by stock issued for services of ~~advances~~$1.1 tomillion, aimpairment ~~related~~loss ~~party~~recognized ~~while~~on ~~cash~~the Beauport project of approximately $1.0 million and unrealized foreign exchange loss of approximately $0.9 million. Cash used in ~~investing~~operations ~~activities~~ for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 ~~consisted~~was attributable to the Company's net loss from operations of approximately $~~185~~19.2 million and unrealized foreign exchange gain of approximately $0.6 million,~~061~~ partially offset by abandoned project cost of ~~advances~~approximately to$5.6 amillion, stock-based compensation of approximately $2.3 million, provision for loan losses related ~~party~~to the British Columbia (Canada) projects of approximately $0.5 million.

~~Net~~Cash ~~cash~~used ~~provided~~in byinvesting ~~financing~~ activities for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 ~~consisted~~was ofapproximately $~~3,397,222~~4.9 ~~from~~million ~~the~~which ~~issuance~~consisted of ~~a mortgage note payable, $500,000 from the issuance of~~ loans ~~payable~~receivable ~~to a third party, $222,603~~ from ~~the~~FL2 ~~issuance~~while ofthere ~~loans~~was ~~payable to related parties, $2,162,500 from deposits received~~no ~~for notes payable, $377,999 from issuance of preferred stock, $573,915 from deposits for preferred stock issuable and $3,847,031 from the sale of common stock, net of~~ cash ~~issuance costs, offset by $115,000 of payments on convertible notes payable, $416,142 of payments on mortgage notes payable and $112,200 of payments on performance-linked notes payable. Net cash~~ provided by ~~financing~~ investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted of $865,080 from the issuance of a mortgage note payable, $415,000 from the issuance of loans payable to a third party, $284,643 from the issuance of loans payable to related parties, $3,003,009 from the issuance of notes payable, net of cash issuance costs, $3,931,131 for deposits received for notes payable, and $7,666,949 from the sale of common stock, net of cash issuance costs, offset by $1,160,865 of a payment on a land loan, $86,475 of payments on loans from related parties and $395,569 of payments on convertible notes payable2016.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $14.8 million which mostly consisted of approximately $6.2 million from deposits received for notes payable subscriptions, approximately $5.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of a mortgage note payable, approximately $1.5 million in deposits for Series B preferred stock issuable, approximately $1.7 million in contributions from non-controlling interest holders and approximately $1.1 million in net proceeds from loans payable (including loans from related parties), which were partially offset by approximately $1.6 million in payments on mortgage notes and loans. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted primarily of approximately $3.8 million from the issuance of common stock, net of cash issuance costs, approximately $3.4 million from the issuance of a mortgage note payable and approximately $2.2 million of deposits received for notes payable subscriptions.

We will require additional funds to fully implement our plans. These funds may be raised through equity financing, debt financing, or other sources, which may result in the dilution in the equity ownership of our shares. We currently do not have any guaranteed arrangements for additional financing and we may not be able to obtain financing when required. Our future is dependent upon our ability to obtain financing, a successful marketing and promotion program and, further in the future, achieving a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, or issuing additional notes payable, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

Going Concern

The Company has incurred net losses of $1910,~~209~~344,~~484~~ 459 and $1119,~~716~~209,~~661~~484 for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, and has incurred cumulative losses since inception of $3647,~~226~~032,~~353~~256. The Company has a deficit in working capital of $1829,~~463~~306,~~156~~118 as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and used cash in operations of $108,~~469~~324,~~799~~294 for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern and the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on the execution of management’s plans, which include the raising of capital through the debt and/or equity markets, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements.

There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating additional cash from the equity/debt markets or other sources to be used for operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary. Based on the Company’s current resources, the Company will not be able to continue to operate without additional immediate funding. Should the Company not be successful in obtaining the necessary financing to fund its operations, the Company would need to curtail certain or all operational activities and/or contemplate the sale of its assets, if necessary.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~Unites~~United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make significant judgments and estimates. Some accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements. Our financial position and results of operations may be materially different when reported under different conditions or when using different assumptions in the application of such policies. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual amounts, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information.

We believe the following critical accounting policies govern our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Reserve for Loan Losses

The Company maintains its reserve for loans losses account for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its borrowers to meet their payment obligations. Management determines whether an allowance needs to be provided for an amount due from a borrower depending on the aging of its receivables, recent payment history, contractual terms and other qualitative factors. The amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts was $2.1 million ~~and $1.6 million~~ as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

Variable Interest Entities

To determine if the Company holds a controlling financial interest in an entity, the Company first evaluates the need to apply the variable interest entity (“VIE”) model to the entity, otherwise the entity is evaluated under the voting interest model. A VIE is an entity that either (i) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (ii) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Assets recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs do not represent additional assets that could be used to satisfy claims against our general assets. Conversely, liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs do not represent additional claims on our general assets; rather, they represent claims against the specific assets of the consolidated VIEs.

Income Taxes

The Company applies ASC subtopic 740-10 for recording the provision for income taxes. ASC 740-10 requires the use of the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company has a valuation allowance of $1115.8 4 million. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.

The Company applies ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions. This interpretation requires that an entity recognizes in the consolidated financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company’s accounting policy is to accrue interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if and when required, as interest expense and a component of other expenses, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations.

1213

U.S. federal income tax reform legislation, known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, was signed into law on December 22, 2017 (the “Tax Reform Bill”) which reduces the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. In December 2017 the SEC staff issued guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Reform Bill. The guidance provides that the income tax effects of those aspects of the Tax Reform Bill for which the Company’s accounting for income taxes is complete must be reflected in the current period and allows for reporting provisional amounts during a measurement period until the evaluation is complete. The Company management believes that the tax effects of these provisions do not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their respective useful lives and, along with other long-lived assets, are evaluated for impairment periodically whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their related carrying amounts may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-15, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” In evaluating long-lived assets for recoverability, including finite-lived intangibles and property and equipment, the Company uses its best estimate of future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and eventual disposition in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-15. To the extent that estimated future undiscounted cash inflows attributable to the asset, less estimated future undiscounted cash outflows, are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference between the carrying value of such asset and its fair value. Assets to be disposed of and for which there is a committed plan of disposal, whether through sale or abandonment, are reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell.

Asset recoverability is an area involving management judgment, requiring assessment as to whether the carrying value of assets can be supported by the undiscounted future cash flows. In calculating the future cash flows, certain assumptions are required to be made in respect of highly uncertain matters such as revenue growth rates, gross margin percentages and terminal growth rates.

During fiscal year 2017, due to its continued difficulties with completing the zoning conversion for the Beauport project the Company determined that it would not be able to develop the acquired land in the foreseeable future. Based on the revised forecast for the project, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $972,097 (CAD 1,252,000) for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Stock Based Compensation

We measure stock compensation expenses in connection with our share-based awards based on the estimated value of the awards on the date of grant and recognize them as compensation expenses over the service period for such awards expected to vest. Therefore, we only recognize compensation cost for those awards expected to vest over the service of the award.

The fair value of stock awards is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock and fair value of share options is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes model. We estimate the volatility of our shares on the date of grant utilizing either the historical volatility of our publicly-traded shares or the price of shares sold to investors when determined to be more reliable. We estimate the risk-free interest rate based on rates in effect for United States government bonds with terms similar to the expected terms of the stock options, at the time of grant. We estimate the expected terms by taking into account the contractual terms and historical exercise patterns. The estimated number of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amount will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. Changes in our estimates and assumptions may cause us to realize material changes in share-based compensation expenses in the future.

Profit Participation Liability

The Company’s Beauport Series A and ~~Series~~ Series D notes contain a premium payment to the noteholders on each sale of the Beauport project in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the noteholder’s pro rata share of the total net profit on each parcel of the Beauport project sold. The potential ~~profit~~ profit in the Beauport project was estimated to be approximately $1.2 million, based on management’s best estimates at inception of the notes ~~and as of December 31~~, ~~2015,~~ of which, $197,146 was the pro rata share of the Beauport Series A and D noteholders and was recorded as a profit participation liability, embedded within the notes. As of December 31, 2016, management revised the estimated profit for the project to be approximately $0.9 million and the balance of profit participation liability was adjusted to $122,718. ~~Changes~~In fiscal year 2017, due to its continued difficulties with completing the zoning conversion the Company determined that it would not be able to develop the acquired land in ~~our~~the ~~estimates~~foreseeable ~~and~~future. ~~assumptions~~The ~~may~~Company ~~cause~~will uscontinue its discussions with the appropriate authorities to ~~realize~~expedite the ~~material~~timing ~~changes~~of zoning conversion, however at the same time has started discussions with potential partners and buyers to take over some or all of its interest in the project. Based on the revised forecast for the project, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $972,097 and reversed the $122,718 profit participation liability to interest income during the year ended December 31, 2017 given lower expected profit for the project primarily due to reduced level of developable lots based on new developments in the discussions with the ~~future~~local municipality.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recently issued accounting pronouncements are described in Note 3 of the consolidated audited financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Item 7a. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not ~~applicable~~required by smaller reporting companies.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The full text of the Company's audited ~~consolidated~~ consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, begins on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

13Item 9. Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure.

~~ITEM 9~~None. ~~Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure.~~

None.

Item 9a. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As required by Rule 13(a)-15(e)/15d-15(e) ~~under~~ under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we have carried ~~out~~ out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our Company's disclosure controls and procedures. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon the results of that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, our Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective and do not provide reasonable assurance that material information related to our Company required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions on required disclosure.

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

· Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; · Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and · Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

	·	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company's disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based upon the framework in Internal Control –Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company had material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, management identified the following material weaknesses at December 31, 2016:15

1.With ~~Lack~~the participation of ~~oversight~~the byChief ~~independent~~Executive Officer ~~directors~~and inChief ~~the~~Financial ~~establishment~~Officer, ~~and~~our ~~monitoring~~management evaluated the effectiveness of ~~required~~the Company's internal ~~controls~~control ~~and~~over ~~procedures;~~financial reporting 2.as ~~Lack~~ of ~~functioning~~December ~~audit committee~~31, ~~resulting~~2017 inbased ~~ineffective~~upon ~~oversight~~the framework in ~~the~~Internal ~~establishment~~Control ~~and~~–Integrated ~~monitoring~~Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of ~~required~~Sponsoring ~~internal~~Organizations ~~controls~~of ~~and~~the ~~procedures;~~Treadway 3Commission (COSO). ~~Insufficient~~Based ~~personnel~~on ~~resources~~that ~~within~~evaluation, ~~the~~our ~~accounting~~management ~~function~~has toconcluded that, ~~segregate~~as of December 31, 2017, the ~~duties~~Company ~~over~~had ~~financial~~material ~~transaction~~weaknesses ~~processing~~in ~~and~~its ~~reporting~~internal ~~and~~control ~~lack~~over offinancial ~~experienced~~reporting. ~~personnel~~Specifically, management toidentified ~~deal~~the ~~with~~following ~~complex~~material ~~accounting~~weaknesses ~~issues;~~at December 31, 2017:

141. Lack of oversight by independent directors in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures;

	2.	Lack of functioning audit committee, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures;

	3.	Insufficient personnel resources within the accounting function to segregate the duties over financial transaction processing and reporting and lack of experienced personnel to deal with complex accounting issues;

Insufficient written policies and procedures over accounting transaction processing and period end financial disclosure and reporting processes.

As a result of the material weaknesses ~~described~~ described above, management has concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting.

To remediate our internal control weaknesses, management intends to implement the following measures:

· The Company intends to add additional independent directors to the board and appoint an audit committee. · The Company intends to hire additional accounting personnel to properly segregate duties and to effect a timely, accurate preparation of the financial statements. · Upon the hiring of additional accounting personnel, the Company intends to develop and maintain adequate written accounting policies and procedures.

· The ~~additional hiring is contingent upon the~~ Company’s ~~efforts~~intends to ~~obtain~~hire additional ~~funding~~accounting ~~through~~personnel ~~equity~~to orproperly ~~debt~~segregate ~~for~~duties ~~its continued operational activities~~ and ~~corporate expenses.~~to ~~Management~~effect ~~expects~~a totimely, ~~secure~~accurate ~~funds~~preparation inof the ~~coming~~financial ~~fiscal year but provides no assurances that it will be able to do so~~statements.

We· ~~understand~~Upon ~~that~~the ~~remediation~~hiring of ~~material weaknesses~~additional ~~and~~accounting ~~deficiencies in internal controls is a continuing work in progress. However~~personnel, ~~remediation~~the ofCompany ~~any~~intends ~~known~~to ~~deficiency is~~develop ~~among our highest priorities. Our management will periodically assess the progress~~ and ~~sufficiency~~maintain ofadequate ~~our~~written ~~ongoing~~accounting ~~initiatives and~~policies ~~make adjustments as~~ and ~~when necessary~~procedures.

The additional hiring is contingent upon the Company’s efforts to obtain additional funding through equity or debt for its continued operational activities and corporate expenses. During fiscal year 2017, the Company hired one full-time senior accountant to assist the Chief Financial Officer with day-to-day bookkeeping and reporting, however, the Company continues to experience high turnover in personnel within its accounting and finance department.

We understand that remediation of material weaknesses and deficiencies in internal controls are a continuing work in progress. However, remediation of any known deficiency is among our highest priorities. Our management will periodically assess the progress and sufficiency of our ongoing initiatives and make adjustments as and when necessary.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation described above during the quarter ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None

1516

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following table includes information with respect to all persons serving as executive officers and directors as of the date of the Form 10-K.

Name	Age	Positions
Martin Scholz	40	Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Peter Hoffmann	82	Chairman of the Board of Directors
Sebastien Cliche	34	President and Director
Martin Scholz	41	Chief Executive Officer and Director
Stéphane Boivin	50	Chief Operating Officer and Director
Marshall Scott Vayer	66	Senior Vice President and Director
Yuhi Horiguchi	41	Chief Financial Officer
Marc-André Lévesque	48	Vice President of Project Development – North America
Yuhi Horiguchi	42	Chief Financial Officer
Claudia Nelke	52	Vice President of Administration

The directors named above will serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until his respective resignation or removal from office. Thereafter, directors are anticipated to be elected for one-year terms at the annual stockholders' meeting. Officers will hold their positions at the discretion of the Board of Directors~~, absent any employment agreement, of which none currently exists~~.

Peter Hoffmann

Peter Hoffmann was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of ROI in February 2018. Mr. Hoffmann has served as Director, Managing Partner and Owner of several real estate investment companies in Canada for over 25 years. He is also a key investor and manager of a portfolio of major real estate properties in North America. Mr. Hoffmann has been a ROI shareholder since 2014 and has served as a member of the Company’s Advisory Board of the Board of Directors since August 2015 where he has been essential in identifying and sourcing new business opportunities.

Martin Scholz

Martin Scholz was appointed as our Chief ~~Executive~~ Executive Officer ~~and~~in ~~Chairman~~May of2017 ~~the~~and ~~Board~~also ofserves ~~Directors~~as onDirector ~~May~~to 9,the ~~2017~~board of ROI. Mr. Scholz previously served as Chief Sales Officer of the Company since October 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Scholz was a qualified financial consultant at Deutsche Bank for 20 years and a regional director for the independent sales force. While at Deutsche Bank, Mr. Scholz managed a team of ~~financial~~ financial advisors and he was responsible for providing a range of financial and real estate planning services to individuals and families. Mr. Scholz was also responsible for the acquisition of new private and business clients, organizational planning, strategic ~~management~~ management and advising entrepreneurs on how to successfully develop their business. He is fluent in English and German.

~~Sebastien~~Marshall ~~Cliche~~Scott Vayer

~~Sebastien~~Marshall ~~Cliche~~Scott isVayer ~~the~~was ~~co-founder~~appointed ofas ~~the Company~~our ~~and~~Executive ~~was~~Vice ~~elected~~President asand aDirector ~~director~~in ofMay ~~the~~2018. ~~Company~~For onover ~~September~~thirty 17years, ~~2013~~Mr. Vayer practiced as an attorney and ~~was~~counselor ~~appointed~~at aslaw. Mr. ~~our~~Vayer ~~Chief~~brings ~~Executive~~experience ~~Officer~~in oninternational ~~May~~business, 19real estate development, strategic planning, M&A, equity, debt, secured ~~2014.~~finance, Mrexport administration & BXA licensing, corporate crisis management and software development. ~~Cliche~~He ~~resigned~~has ~~from~~performed ~~his~~corporate and ~~position~~transactional aswork, ~~Chief~~project ~~Executive~~teaming ~~Officer~~in security, and, ~~was~~when ~~appointed~~he practiced as ~~Co-President~~an attorney, federal and ~~Chief~~state ~~Operating~~litigation, ~~Officer~~negotiation, onmediation ~~April~~and 5,arbitration. ~~2016~~He ~~before~~worked ~~becoming~~for ~~President~~more onthan ~~April~~twenty ~~18,~~years ~~2017.~~as Mroutside general counsel to an international corporate group with combined sales to $100 million in the U. ~~Cliche~~S., isEurope, Middle East and Russia, as well as a ~~real~~multi-brand ~~estate~~EU ~~developer~~fashion group, and for isdiversified ~~currently~~national ~~involved~~and international business interests including corporate directorships. He has also been an adviser to ina ~~several~~U.S. presidential administration for discretionary economic development ~~projects~~grants inas ~~Quebec~~part ~~City~~of the federal block grants program. InBefore entering private practice of law he served as General Counsel & Director of Business Affairs for the ~~last~~3M 10Company’s ~~years~~cable TV subsidiary, MrCNI. ~~Cliche~~A ~~contributed~~founding tomember of the ~~development~~Cardozo School of ~~more~~Law ~~than~~(Yeshiva ~~500 residential~~University, ~~units~~NYC), ~~and~~Mr. ~~commercial~~Vayer ~~properties.~~was Hehonored isas ~~also~~a Samuel Belkin Scholar and was awarded a ~~General~~Doctor ~~Partner~~of inLaws ~~Azur~~(J.D.) &in ~~Capital~~1979. ~~Real~~Mr. ~~Estate~~Vayer ~~Fund~~earned -his ~~Quebec~~B.A. Hewith ~~is fluent~~Field Study from Amherst College in ~~French~~Amherst, Massachusetts (1979).

~~Stéphane Boivin~~17

~~Stéphane Boivin~~Marc-André ~~was appointed as Chief Operating Officer on April 18, 2017 and as Director on May 9, 2017. Mr. Boivin has over 20 years'~~Lévesque project development experience working with investors, plant managers, builders and architects. Having worked on various projects from luxury hotels to commercial and residential buildings to industrial and telecom infrastructures, including 22 office buildings in Brazil, Columbia, Mexico, the United States and Canada, Mr. Boivin will lend his senior leadership skills to all the projects ROI develops around the world. He is fluent in French and English.

Marc-André Lévesque was appointed as our Vice President of Project Development – North America in September 2018 and is responsible for overseeing the Company’s new and existing residential and commercial development projects. Mr. Lévesque has more than 16 years of experience in land acquisition and in residential, commercial and industrial project design and construction in the United States, Canada and other countries. Renowned for his solid knowledge in sustainable development, he developed some skills in creating innovative projects such as TOD’s and renewable energy developments. Mr. Lévesque joined the Company in September 2014 and has previously taken executive positions including the Company’s Chief Operating Officer.

Yuhi Horiguchi

Yuhi Horiguchi was appointed as our Chief Financial Officer in August 2017. Mr. Horiguchi has over 17 years of experience in finance and accounting serving corporate clients primarily in Asia and the United States with a focus on financial management, business turnarounds, financial restructuring and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining the Company, he was a founding member and/or held executive roles in several Tokyo-based financial advisory firms. During his tenure, he was involved in various turnaround projects for financial service firms where he held executive positions and successfully achieved corporate turnarounds. Prior to founding his own firm, Mr. Horiguchi worked at Deutsche Securities Inc. where he was involved in identifying and analyzing corporate investment opportunities primarily in distressed debt, equity and real estate. He began his career at Ernst & Young LLP where he was an audit manager providing audit and business advisory services to Japanese and U.S corporate clients. He is fluent in English, Japanese and proficient in Portuguese.

16Claudia Nelke

Claudia Nelke was appointed as Vice President of Administration in February 2018. Ms. Nelke joined ROI as Executive Assistant to the CEO in December 2015 and was also appointed as Corporate Secretary in June 2017. After completing her education in graphic arts and visual communication, she worked as Artistic Director for several national and international brands. In 2001, she became Customer Service and Visual Communication Manager for large-scale interactive 3D projects related to international events or outstanding sites. Through her work as a real estate broker, Ms. Nelke acquired substantial knowledge of related legal processes and the management of real estate projects.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Nevada Corporation Law allows for the indemnification of officers, directors, and any corporate agents in terms sufficiently broad to indemnify such persons under certain circumstances for liabilities, including reimbursement for expenses, incurred arising under the 1933 Act. The Bylaws of the Company provide that the Company will indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by law and such right to indemnification will continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer of the Company and will inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and Consultants; provided, however, that, except for proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, the Company will not be obligated to indemnify any director or officer in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board of Directors. The right to indemnification conferred will include the right to be paid by the Company the expenses (including attorney’s fees) incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition.

The Company may, to the extent authorized from time to time by the Board of Directors, provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to employees and agents of the Company similar to those conferred to directors and officers of the Company. The rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses are subject to the requirements of the 1933 Act to the extent applicable.

Furthermore, the Company may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect itself and any director, officer, employee or agent of the Company or another company against any expense, liability or loss, whether or not the Company would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the Nevada General Corporation Law.

Significant Employees and Consultants

~~Our~~We ~~officers~~have ~~and~~three ~~directors~~officers who are ~~not~~an employees of the Company. The ~~three~~remaining officers ~~are~~and ~~independent~~directors are contractors/consultants to the Company.

Conflicts of Interest

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has not established an audit committee and does not have an audit committee financial expert, nor has the Board established a nominating committee. The Board is of the opinion that such committees are not necessary since the Company is its early development stage company and has only three directors, and to date, such three directors have been performing the functions of such committees. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation, nominations, and audit issues that may affect management decisions.

Other than as described above, we are not aware of any other conflicts of interest of our executive officers and directors.

There are no legal proceedings that have occurred since our incorporation concerning our directors which involved a criminal conviction, a criminal proceeding, an administrative or civil proceeding limiting one's participation in the securities or banking industries, or a finding of securities or commodities law violations.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

We have not implemented a formal policy or procedure by which our stockholders can communicate directly with our Board of Directors. Nevertheless, every effort has been made to ensure that the views of stockholders are heard by the Board of Directors or individual directors, as applicable, and that appropriate responses are provided to stockholders in a timely manner. We believe that we are responsive to stockholder communications, and therefore have not considered it necessary to adopt a formal process for stockholder communications with our Board. During the upcoming year, our Board will continue to monitor whether it would be appropriate to adopt such a process.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") thereunder require the Company's Executive Officers and Directors, and persons who own more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Commission and to furnish the Company with copies of all such forms they file.

17Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it and written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that, during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, all of its Executive Officers, Directors, and 10% stockholders complied with the filing requirements applicable to them.

Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it and written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that, during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, all of its Executive Officers, Directors, and 10% stockholders complied with the filing requirements applicable to them, except that Dr. Chaouch failed to filed a Form 4 or Form 5 with respect to the options granted to him under his Consulting Agreement, which were approved by the shareholders on November 9, 2015, Mr. Cliche failed to file a Form 4 or Form 5 with respect to the options granted to him under his Consulting Agreement, which were approved by the shareholders on November 9, 2015, and Mr. Germain failed to filed a Form 4 or Form 5 with respect to the options granted to him under his Employment Agreement, which were approved by the shareholders on November 9, 2015, and two private sales of common stock.19

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, or earned by, ~~or paid to~~ our officers for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the fiscal periods indicated.

Name and Principal Position	Year		~~Salary~~	Salary		~~Bonus~~	Bonus		~~Stock Awards~~	Stock Awards		~~Option Awards~~	Option Awards		~~All Other Compensation~~	All Other Compensation		~~Total~~	Total
									~~(1)~~	(1)		~~(1)~~	(1)		~~(2)~~	(2)
Sami Chaouch, Chief Executive Officer	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	300,000		$	300,000
Martin Scholz, Chief Executive Officer		2017		$	600,000		$	–		$	100,000		$	–		$	–		$	700,000
(Appointed Chief Executive Officer on April 5, 2016, resigned May 18, 2017)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	940,000		$	185,000		$	1,125,000
(Formerly Executive Vice President, appointed Chief Executive Officer May 18, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	10,840		$	600,000		$	610,840
Sebastien Cliche, President (formerly Co-President)	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	300,000		$	300,000
Sami Chaouch (formerly Chief Executive Officer)		2017		$	–		$	–		$	1,000,000		$	–		$	20,000		$	1,020,000
(Appointed August 22, 2016)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	940,000		$	177,500		$	1,117,500
(Appointed Chief Executive Officer April 5, 2015, resigned May 18, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	300,000		$	300,000
Philippe Germain (formerly Co-President)	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	143,215		$	143,215
Stéphane Boivin (formerly Chief Operating Officer)		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	275,000		$	275,000
(Appointed August 5, 2016, resigned Co-President on August 22, 2017)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	940,000		$	177,500		$	1,117,500
(Appointed April 18, 2017, resigned February 22, 2018)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Martin Scholz, Chief Executive Officer (formerly Executive Vice President)	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	10,840		$	600,000		$	610,840
Sebastien Cliche, President (formerly Co-President)		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	225,000		$	225,000
(Appointed on May 9, 2017)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed President August 22, 2016, resigned October 3, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	300,000		$	300,000
Slim Feriani, Executive Vice President of Finance and Investments and Chief Financial Officer	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	851,797		$	450,000		$	1,301,797
Philippe Germain (formerly Co-President)		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed March 18, 2016, resigned August 2, 2016)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed Co-President August 5, 2016, resigned August 22, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	143,215		$	143,215
Mohsen Maaouia, Interim Chief Executive Officer	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	27,500		$	27,500
Yuhi Horiguchi, Chief Financial Officer		2017		$	–		$	37,600		$	–		$	–		$	2,400		$	40,000
(Appointed August 2, 2016, resigned April 18, 2017)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed August 18, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Antoine Tronquoy (formerly Chief Financial Officer)		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	14,870		$	14,870
(Appointed April 18, 2017, resigned August 18, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Mohsen Maaouia (formerly Interim Chief Executive Officer)		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	62,500		$	62,500
(Appointed August 2, 2016, resigned April 18, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	27,500		$	27,500
Slim Feriani (formerly Executive Vice President of Finance and Investments and Chief Financial Officer)		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed March 18, 2016, resigned August 2, 2016)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	851,797		$	450,000		$	1,301,797

(1)	Stock and option awards are valued based on the aggregate fair value of the award on the date of grant and are computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Option awards granted to Slim Feriani were entirely canceled upon his resignation on August 2, 2016.

(2) Other compensation represents consulting payments made to the officer. Consulting agreement for Sami Chaouch is entered into between Esthete Inc., of which Sami Chaouch is the beneficial owner. Consulting agreement for Slim Feriani is entered into between SF International Consulting Limited, of which Slim Feriani is the beneficial owner. Consulting agreement for Antoine Tronquoy is entered into between Galibier Inc., of which Antoine Tronquoy is the beneficial owner.

1820

The following table provides information ~~regarding~~ regarding outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017:

Name

Number of shares underlying unexercised options exercisable

Number of shares underlying unexercised options unexercisable

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of shares underlying unexercised unearned options

Option exercise price $

Option expiration date

Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested

Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested $

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested $

Sami Chaouch

400,000

1,600,000

–

1.65

11/9/2025

–

Sebastien Cliche

400,000

1,600,000

–

1.65

11/9/2025

–

Philippe Germain

400,000

1,600,000

–

1.65

11/9/2025

–

Martin Scholz

750,000

–

1.65

11/1/2019

–

Stéphane Boivin

–

Sebastien Cliche

800,000

–

1.65

11/9/2025

–

Yuhi Horiguchi

–

Risk Assessment of Compensation Program

In August 2015, management assessed our compensation program for the purpose of reviewing and considering any risks presented by our compensation policies and practices that are likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

As part of that assessment, management reviewed the primary elements of our compensation program, including base salary, annual short-term incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation and severance arrangements. Management's risk assessment included a review of the overall design of each primary element of our compensation program, and an analysis of the various design features, controls and approval rights in place with respect to compensation paid to management and other employees that mitigate potential risks to us that could arise from our compensation program.

Following the assessment, management determined that our compensation policies and practices did not create risks that were reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us and reported the results of the assessment to the Compensation Committee.

Employment Agreements

Effective August 1, 2015, we entered into Consulting Agreements with each of the Company’s then three officers (Sami Chaouch, Philippe Germain and Sebastien Cliche). The agreement may be terminated by either party with or without cause, provided that we must provide 90-days’ notice if we terminate the agreement without cause. Under each consulting agreement, the officer is entitled to a base salary of $300,000 per year and a cash bonus equal to 1.25% of EBITDA as determined by management based on the year-end audited financial statements of the Company. Additionally, each officer was granted non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Common Stock under the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which 2,000,000 shares is equal to 10.0 percent of the total number of shares which may be issued under the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan. Subsequent grants will be determined by the Board. In the event the Company terminates an officer’s consulting agreement without “cause” the Company has agreed to pay him a lump-sum severance amount equal to (1) three years of base salary, plus (2) the greater of (a) the annual cash bonus for the year of termination and (b) the highest bonus paid in the preceding three years. If the officer is terminated by the Company without cause within 36 months after a change in control then the shall be entitled to receive, in lieu of the foregoing termination payment, an amount equal to his average annual compensation during the three years preceding the tax year in which the date of termination occurs, multiplied by two.

1921

~~Effective~~During ~~August 1~~2016, ~~2015,~~the weCompany entered into a a consulting agreement with Martin Scholz. ~~Under~~whereby ~~the terms of this agreement,~~ Mr. Scholz is entitled to a base salary of $~~600~~50,000 per ~~year~~month, a one-time signing bonus of $15,000, non-qualified stock options, to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Common Stock, vesting over a three-year period. The agreement also provides for additional non-qualified stock options, to purchase up to 250,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Common Stock, to be granted each quarter over the duration of ~~this~~ the agreement vesting over a three-year period. ~~This~~In November 2016, Mr. Scholz’s agreement iswas ~~valid~~retroactively ~~over~~amended ~~three~~to ~~years~~be ~~unless~~in ~~earlier~~a ~~terminated~~form ~~based~~of onan ~~the~~employment ~~provisions~~agreement inwith the same terms as the original consulting agreement in order to satisfy local labor regulations in Germany.

Effective February 1, 2017, we entered into a consulting agreement with Stéphane Boivin. Under the terms of this agreement, Mr. Boivin is entitled to a base salary of $300,000 per year, of which 50% shall be deferred until the completion of the Colorado project financing. This agreement is valid over a two-year period unless earlier terminated based on the provisions in the agreement. In February 2018, Mr. Boivin resigned from his positions as the Company’s Board of Directors and Chief Operating Officer as well as from his directorship positions held in the Company’s subsidiaries, namely ROI DEV Canada Inc., ROI Securitisation SA and ROI Land Investments FZ. Mr. Boivin also owns 49% of ROI Technical Services (“ROI Tech”), a Dubai corporation, which is party to an office lease agreement in Dubai.

Effective August 10, 2017, we entered into a consulting agreement with Yuhi Horiguchi. Under the terms of this agreement, compensation for Mr. Horiguchi ~~will~~is ~~be paid~~ $13,600 (CAD 18,000) per year. This agreement is valid over a one-year period unless earlier terminated based on the provisions in the agreement.

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017:

Plan Category

Plan Category

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights

~~Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights~~

~~Number~~Weighted ofaverage ~~securities~~exercise ~~remaining~~price ~~available~~of ~~for~~outstanding ~~future~~options, ~~issuance~~warrants ~~under~~and ~~equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))~~rights

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

–

~~$ –~~

–$

–

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

~~10,118,259~~

6,443,259

~~$ 1.54~~

–$

1.59

–

Total

~~10,118,259~~

6,443,259

~~$ 1.54~~

–$

1.59

–

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth director compensation for the ~~years~~ years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016:

			~~Fees Earned~~	Fees Earned		~~Stock~~	Stock		~~Option~~	Option		~~All Other~~	All Other
Name	Year		~~in Cash~~	in Cash		~~Awards~~	Awards		~~Awards~~	Awards		~~Compensation~~	Compensation		~~Total~~	Total
						~~(1)~~	(1)		~~(1)~~	(1)		~~(1)~~	(1)		~~(2)~~	(2)
Sami Chaouch, Chairman of the Board of Directors	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Martin Scholz, Chairman of the Board of Directors		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Resigned May 18, 2017)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed March 18, 2016, resigned November 20, 2016, reappointed April 18, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Sebastien Cliche	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Sami Chaouch		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Resigned May 18, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Philippe Germain,	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Sebastien Cliche		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Resigned May 27, 2016)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Resigned December 29, 2017)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Martin Scholz	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Philippe Germain,		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed March 18, 2016, resigned November 20, 2016, reappointed April 18, 2017)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Resigned May 27, 2016)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Slim Feriani	2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Stéphane Boivin		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed March 18, 2016, resigned August 2, 2016)	2015		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed April 18, 2017, resigned February 22, 2018)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
Slim Feriani		2017		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–
(Appointed March 18, 2016, resigned August 2, 2016)		2016		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–		$	–

(1)	Stock awards are valued based on the aggregate fair value of the award on the date of grant and are computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(2)	Other compensation represents consulting payments made to the director.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters

The following table summarizes certain ~~information~~ information regarding the beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of outstanding Series A Common Stock, Series A Preferred Stock and Series AB Preferred Stock as of ~~June~~September 30, ~~2017~~2018 by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding Series A Common Stock and Series A Preferred Stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers (as defined in Item 403(a) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act), and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes below, the security and stockholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares.

Name of Beneficial Owner (3)

Title of Stock Class

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner (1)

Percent of Class (2)

Series A Common

Series A Preferred

Series A Common

Series A Preferred

Sami Chaouch (4) (5)

Series A Common

800,000

–

1.37

–

Sebastien Cliche (4) (5)

Series A Common

2,200,000

–

3.78

–

Sebastien Cliche (4) (5)

Series A Preferred

–

100,000

–

100.00%

Philippe Germain (4) (5)

Series A Common

1,557,779

–

2.67

–

Martin Scholz (4) (5)

Series A Common

1,898,103

–

3.26

–

Slim Feriani (4) (5)

Series A Common

23,333

–

0.04

–

Mohsen Maaouia (5)

Series A Common

–

0.00

–

Alternative Strategy Partners Pte. Ltd. (5)

Series A Common

2,722,573

–

4.67

–

Oxbow Enterprises Limited (5)

Series A Common

2,676,191

–

4.59

–

All Directors and Officers as a Group (6 persons)

6,479,215

100,000

11.12

100.00%

Name of Beneficial Owner (3)

Title of
Stock Class

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Owner (1)

Percent of
Class (2)

Common

Preferred

Series A

Common

Series A

Preferred

Series B

Preferred

Sami Chaouch (4) (5)

Series B Preferred

–

1,000,000

–

14.40%

Sebastien Cliche (4) (5)

Series A Common

2,200,000

–

3.94%

–

Sebastien Cliche (4) (5)

Series A Preferred

–

100,000

–

50.00%

–

Philippe Germain (4) (5)

Series A Common

1,557,779

–

2.79%

–

Martin Scholz (4) (5)

Series A Common

1,677,776

–

3.00%

–

Martin Scholz (4) (5)

Series A Preferred

–

100,000

–

50.00%

–

Slim Feriani (4) (5)

Series A Common

23,333

–

0.04%

–

Alternative Strategy Partners Pte. Ltd. (5)

Series A Common

2,722,573

–

4.87%

–

Oxbow Enterprises Limited (5)

Series A Common

2,676,191

–

4.79%

–

All Directors and Officers as a Group
(6 persons)

10,857,652

1,200,000

19,42%

100.00%

14.40%

(1)

"Beneficial Owner" means having or sharing, directly or indirectly (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting, or (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or to direct the disposition, of shares of the Series A Common Stock and Series A Preferred Stock of an issuer. The definition of beneficial ownership includes shares, underlying options or warrants to purchase common stock, or other securities convertible into common stock, that currently are exercisable or convertible or that will become exercisable or convertible within 60 days.

(2) For each shareholder, the calculation of percentage of beneficial ownership is based upon 5855,~~270~~901,~~105~~042 shares of Series A Common Stock, ~~and~~ 200,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 6,935,712 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, ~~2017~~2018, and shares of Series A Common Stock, Series A Preferred Stock and Series AB Preferred Stock subject to options, warrants and/or conversion rights held by the shareholder that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days, which are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the shareholder holding such options, warrants, or conversion rights. The percentage ownership of any shareholder is determined by assuming that the shareholder has exercised all options, warrants and conversion rights to obtain additional securities and that no other shareholder has exercised such rights.

(3)	Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is c/o ROI Land Investments Ltd., 1002 Sherbrooke West, Suite 1430 Montreal, Quebec H3A 3L6.

(4)	Indicates ownership held or controlled by current or former Director.

(5)	Indicates ownership held or controlled by current or former Officer.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our directors. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation and audit issues that may affect management decisions. We are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executives or directors.

Director Independence

We are not subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or national securities association and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our board comprised of a majority of “independent directors.” Our determination of independence of directors is made using the definition of “independent director” contained in Rule 4200(a) (15) of the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”), even though such definitions do not currently apply to us because we are not listed on NASDAQ. We have determined that none of our directors currently meets the definition of “independent” as within the meaning of such rules as a result of their current positions as our executive officers.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

~~The~~On May 18, 2017, the Company ~~leases~~entered into a ~~corporate~~Termination, ~~apartment~~General ~~for Sebastien~~Release ~~Cliche~~and Settlement Agreement with Sami Chaouch, the Company’s ~~President~~former Chairman and CEO (resigned May 18, a2017), ~~month-~~whereby the Company releases Mr. Chaouch from all outstanding claims from and obligations to~~-month~~ ~~basis~~the Company upon satisfaction of he following conditions: a) immediate termination from all agreements (except for a life insurance policy in favor of Mr. ~~Monthly~~Chaouch) ~~rental~~between isthe Company, including the resignation from his positions as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and b) return and cancellation of all Series A preferred stock (100,000 shares) owned by Mr. Chaouch. This agreement also entitles Mr. Chaouch to receive 1,000,000 shares of Series B preferred stock, valued at $1.00 per share,~~906~~ upon signing and ~~total~~to ~~rent~~remain ~~paid~~as beneficiary for ~~the~~a ~~year~~corporate life insurance policy in favor of ~~ended~~Mr. ~~December~~Chaouch. 31As a result of this agreement, ~~2016~~the ~~was~~Company accounted for an expense of $51,~~719~~000,000 as consulting fees and derecognized all outstanding receivables and payables between Mr. ~~This~~Chaouch ~~lease~~and ~~was~~recorded ~~cancelled~~a onsettlement ~~March~~gain of $78,393 during the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017. ~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~also~~year ~~had~~ended ~~$65~~December 31,~~744~~ 2017, the Company made compensation of ~~accrued~~$20,000 ~~expenses~~and ~~due~~advance payments of $26,607 to ~~Sebastien~~Mr. ~~Cliche~~Chaouch asfor ofbusiness ~~December 31,~~related ~~2016~~expenses.

~~During~~The ~~the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the~~ Company ~~incurred~~leased ~~business~~a ~~related~~corporate ~~expenses~~ apartment for ~~Philippe~~Sebastien ~~Germain~~Cliche, the Company’s former ~~Co-~~President, ~~totaling~~(resigned ~~$2,080 and~~October $83,~~100,~~ ~~respectively. During the years ended December 31~~2017), ~~2016~~a ~~and~~month-to-month ~~2015~~basis, ~~the~~which ~~Company~~was ~~leased a corporate apartment for Philippe~~cancelled ~~Germain~~ on aMarch ~~month-to-month~~31, ~~basis~~2016. Monthly rental was $~~675~~1,906 and total rent paid for the ~~years~~year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 was $~~2,080~~-0- and $65,~~075~~719, respectively. ~~This~~During ~~lease~~fiscal ~~was~~year ~~cancelled on March 31~~2017, ~~2016.~~the ~~The~~ Company ~~also~~incurred ~~had~~consulting fees of $~~148~~225,~~634~~000 ofto ~~accrued~~Mr. ~~compensation due~~Cliche toof ~~Philippe~~which ~~Germain~~$181,494 remained outstanding as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

During the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2016, ~~the~~ the Company ~~entered~~leased ~~into~~a ~~two~~corporate ~~loan~~apartment ~~agreements~~for ~~with~~ Philippe Germain ~~totaling~~on ~~$103,488.~~a ~~The~~month-to-month ~~loans~~basis. ~~are~~Monthly ~~unsecured,~~rental ~~due~~was in$675 ~~ninety~~and ~~days~~total ~~and~~rent ~~bear~~paid ~~interest~~for atthe 8%years ~~per~~ended ~~annum.~~December ~~$35~~31,~~760~~ of2016 ~~the loan~~ was ~~repaid resulting in a principal balance of~~ $672,~~705~~080. ~~and~~This nolease ~~accrued~~was ~~interest as~~cancelled ofon ~~December~~March 31, 2016. The ~~funds~~Company ~~were~~also ~~used~~had ~~for~~$57,541 of ~~the~~accrued ~~Company’s~~expenses ~~general~~due ~~working~~to ~~capital~~Philippe ~~purpose~~Germain as of December 31, 2017.

~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~leases~~year aended ~~corporate~~December ~~apartment~~31, ~~from~~2016, ~~Louise~~the ~~Gagner~~Company onentered ainto ~~month-to-month~~two ~~basis.~~loan ~~Ms.~~agreements ~~Gagner~~with ~~is the mother of~~ Philippe Germain totaling $103,488. ~~Monthly~~The ~~rental~~loans isare $1unsecured,~~000~~ ~~and~~due ~~total~~in ~~rent~~ninety days ~~paid~~and ~~for~~bear ~~the~~interest ~~year~~at ~~ended~~8% ~~December~~per 31annum. $35,760 ~~2016~~of ~~and~~the ~~2015~~loan was repaid resulting in a principal balance of $367,~~000~~705 and accrued interest of $125,~~000~~493 as of December 31, ~~respectively~~2017. ~~This~~The ~~lease~~funds ~~was~~were ~~cancelled~~used asfor ofthe ~~March~~Company’s ~~31, 2016~~general working capital purpose.

~~During~~The ~~the~~Company ~~year~~leases ~~ended~~a ~~December~~corporate ~~31, 2015, the~~apartment ~~Company~~from ~~entered~~Louise ~~into~~Gagner ~~multiple~~on ~~loan~~a ~~agreements~~month-to-month ~~with~~basis. ~~LMM Group Ltd~~Ms. ~~(“LMM”),~~Gagner ais ~~Swiss~~the ~~company,~~mother ~~and~~of ~~received~~Philippe ~~a total of $248,168~~Germain. ~~The~~Monthly ~~loans~~rental ~~are~~is ~~unsecured~~$1,000 ~~bear interest at 8% per annum~~ and ~~are~~total rent ~~due~~paid atfor ~~various~~the ~~dates~~year ~~beginning~~ended ~~January~~December 131, 2016. Onwas ~~December 10, 2015,~~ $~~150~~3,000. ofThis ~~the~~lease ~~notes~~ was ~~assigned~~cancelled ~~from LMM to 8010609 Canada Inc. The balance of the loans from LMM~~ as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2016~~ ~~and 2015 is $62,488 and $98,168, respectively, and the balance of accrued interest is $11,445 and $5,978, respectively~~2016. ~~Philippe Germain is the sole shareholder of LMM.~~

OnDuring ~~October 29, 2015, 8010609 Canada Inc. loaned~~ the ~~Company~~year ~~$36,475~~ended ~~which was repaid on November 20, 2015. Additionally, on~~ December 1031, 2015, the ~~$150,000~~Company ~~note~~entered ~~held~~into bymultiple ~~LMM~~loan ~~was assigned~~agreements towith ~~8010609~~LMM ~~Canada~~Group ~~Inc~~Ltd. On(“LMM”), ~~the~~a ~~same~~Swiss ~~date~~company, ~~the~~and ~~Company~~received ~~repaid~~a ~~$50,000~~ total of ~~the note~~$248,168. The ~~notes~~loans are unsecured, bear interest at 8% per annum and are due onat ~~December~~various 30dates beginning January 1, ~~2017~~2016. ~~The~~On December ~~balance~~10, 2015, $150,000 of the ~~loans~~notes was assigned from LMM to 8010609 Canada Inc. The balance of the loans from LMM as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~ 2016 is $~~100~~62,~~000~~488 and $~~100~~62,~~000~~488, respectively, and ~~interest~~the ~~was~~balance of accrued oninterest ~~the~~is ~~loans for~~ $815,~~667~~607 and $~~667~~11,445, respectively. ~~The Company~~ ~~also incurred $50,000 of consulting fees to 8010609 Canada Inc. during the year ended December 31, 2016 of which $12,121 remained outstanding as of December 31, 2016.~~ Philippe Germain is ~~also~~ the sole shareholder of ~~8010609 Canada Inc~~LMM.

On October 1329, 2015, ~~the~~8010609 ~~Company~~Canada ~~assumed a~~Inc. ~~second~~loaned ~~mortgage~~the ~~note~~Company ~~due~~$36,475 towhich ~~9202~~was ~~4462~~repaid ~~Quebec~~on ~~Inc.~~November ~~of $288~~20,~~360~~ ~~(CAD~~2015. ~~400~~Additionally,~~000).~~ ~~9202~~on ~~4462~~December ~~Quebec~~10, ~~Inc.~~2015, ~~and~~ the ~~owner~~$150,000 ofnote ~~9202~~held ~~4462 Quebec~~by ~~Inc.~~LMM ~~are~~was ~~shareholders~~assigned ofto ~~the~~8010609 ~~Company~~Canada Inc. ~~The~~On ~~loan~~the issame ~~secured~~date, bythe aCompany ~~second~~repaid ~~rank~~$50,000 ~~mortgage~~of onthe anote. ~~property~~The ~~owned~~notes byare ~~CTC~~unsecured, ~~bears interest~~bear interest at 68% per annum and ~~was~~are due ~~April~~on 13December 30, ~~2016~~2017. AsThe balance of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~loans ~~2016,~~from ~~the~~8010609 ~~principal~~Canada ~~balance~~Inc. as of ~~the~~December ~~loan~~31, 2017 ~~was~~and 2016 is $~~297~~100,~~040~~000 and $~~288~~100,~~360~~000, respectively, and ~~accrued~~ interest was accrued on the loans for $1216,~~020~~778 and $38,~~745~~667, respectively. The AsCompany also incurred $-0- and $50,000 of consulting fees to 8010609 Canada Inc. during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~the~~respectively, ~~note~~and is$14,859 inremains ~~default~~outstanding ~~but~~at ~~the Company~~December is31, ~~currently~~2017. inPhilippe ~~negotiation~~Germain ~~with~~is also the ~~note~~sole ~~holder~~shareholder ~~for~~of an8010609 Canada ~~extension~~Inc.

2225

~~During~~On October 13, 2015, the ~~years~~Company ~~ended~~assumed a second mortgage note due to 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. of $288,360 (CAD 400,000). 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. and the owner of 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. are shareholders of the Company. The loan is secured by a second rank mortgage on a property owned by CTC, bears interest at 6% per annum and was due April 13, 2016. As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~ 2016, the ~~Company~~principal ~~incurred~~balance of the loan was $67318,~~212~~636 and $30297,~~000~~040, respectively, toand ~~Maxim~~accrued ~~Cliche~~interest was $14,339 and $12,020, respectively. During the ~~brother~~years ofended ~~Sebastien~~December ~~Cliche~~31, ~~for~~2017 ~~consulting~~and ~~services.~~2016, interest expense of $2019,~~035~~131 ~~was~~and ~~due~~$14,443, torespectively, ~~Maxim~~was ~~Cliche~~recorded. asAs of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the note is in default but the Company is currently in negotiation with the note holder for an extension.

During the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company ~~entered~~incurred ~~into~~$66,574 ~~two~~and ~~loan~~$67,212, ~~agreements~~respectively, ~~with~~to ~~Louis~~Maxim ~~Gagner totaling $87~~Cliche,~~130.~~ ~~Ms. Gagner is~~ the ~~mother~~brother of ~~Philippe~~Sebastien ~~Germain. The loans are unsecured~~Cliche, ~~due in ninety days and bear no interest. The funds were used~~ for ~~the Company’s general working capital~~consulting ~~purpose~~services.

~~The~~During fiscal year 2016, the Company ~~has~~entered into two loan agreements with Louise Gagner totaling $~~432~~87,~~750~~130. Ms. Gagner is the mother of ~~accrued~~Philippe ~~compensation~~Germain. The loans are unsecured, due toin SFninety ~~International~~days ~~Consulting~~and ~~Limited~~bear asno ofinterest. The loans were repaid in full during the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017. SFThe ~~International~~funds ~~Consulting~~were used ~~Limited~~for isthe anCompany’s ~~entity~~general ~~controlled by~~working ~~Slim~~capital ~~Feriani~~purpose.

The Company ~~has~~incurred $~~121~~700,~~615~~000 (including $100,000 for 100,000 Series A preferred shares issued on May 18, 2017 and valued at $1.00 per share) and $600,000 of ~~accrued~~annual compensation ~~due~~ to ~~Gulf~~Martin ~~Central~~Scholz ~~Agency~~during ~~Assets~~fiscal ~~Management~~years ~~Ltd.~~2017 asand 2016, respectively, of ~~December~~which 31$694,739 ~~2016.~~of ~~Slim~~accrued ~~Feriani~~compensation isand ~~the~~expenses ~~Chairman~~were outstanding as of ~~this~~December ~~entity~~31, 2017.

~~The~~On September 10, 2015, the Company ~~has~~entered into an agreement to acquire 14,400 shares of Capital Evolution Groupe SAS (“CEG”), a French limited liability company, for $~~467~~112,~~003~~187 (EUR 100,000). The Company’s Co-President, Philippe Germain, is a shareholder of ~~accrued~~CEG. ~~compensation~~As of December 31, 2015, $112,187 was paid for the investment and ~~expenses~~was classified as an acquisition deposit in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position. On April 5, 2016, the Company agreed to acquire an additional 144,459 shares of CEG for $1,575,686 (EUR 1,444,590) from Philippe Germain, subject to completion of due diligence by the Company and official registration of the shares in France. The shares to ~~Martin~~be ~~Scholz~~acquired aswill bring the Company’s interest in CEG to 58% once the transaction was consummated. On April 5, 2016, the total consideration for the shares was adjusted to $551,490 (EUR 505,607) by mutual agreement between the parties. During the year ended December 2016, the Company and the shareholders of CEG agreed to rescind the share purchase agreement, to reverse all past investments, expenditures and payables related to CEG and to reimburse the Company for the net balance of $21,038. The Company recorded a net loss from investment in CEG of $164,952 during the year ended December 31, 2016 and classified the amount to be reimbursed to the Company as advances to related party in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

OnDuring ~~September~~fiscal ~~10,~~year ~~2015~~2017, the Company ~~entered~~ ~~into~~continues ~~an agreement~~ to ~~acquire~~engage ~~14,400~~CEG ~~shares~~and ofits ~~Capital~~subsidiary ~~Evolution~~Acadian ~~Groupe~~Advisors ~~SAS~~and Associates (“~~CEG~~Acadian”), awith ~~French~~its ~~limited~~fund ~~liability~~raising ~~company,~~efforts ~~for~~and ~~$112,187~~made ~~(EUR~~advance ~~100,000).~~commission ~~The~~payments ~~Company’s~~to ~~Co-President, Philippe Germain, is a shareholder of~~ CEG. Asand ofAcadian ~~December 31, 2015,~~ totaling $~~112~~1,~~187 was paid for the investment and was classified as an acquisition deposit in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position. On April 5~~463,340 ~~2016, the Company agreed to acquire an additional 144,459 shares~~ of ~~CEG~~which ~~for~~ $1,~~575~~230,~~686~~197 ~~(EUR~~was ~~1,444,590) from~~recorded ~~Philippe~~as ~~Germain,~~debt ~~subject to completion of due diligence by the Company~~ and ~~official registration of the shares in France.~~ ~~The~~equity ~~shares~~issuance ~~to be acquired will bring the Company’s interest in CEG to 58% once the transaction was consummated~~costs. ~~On April 5, 2016, the total consideration for the shares was adjusted to~~ $~~551~~1,~~490 (EUR 505~~038,~~607)~~197 byof ~~mutual~~these ~~agreement~~debt ~~between the parties. During the year ended December 2016, the Company~~ and ~~the~~equity ~~shareholders~~issuance ofcosts ~~CEG~~were ~~agreed~~capitalized to ~~rescind~~ the ~~share~~corresponding ~~purchase~~notes ~~agreement, to~~payable ~~reverse all past investments, expenditures~~ and ~~payables~~equity. ~~related~~The toremaining ~~CEG and to reimburse the Company for the net~~ balance of $21301,~~038. The~~998 ~~Company~~was recorded aas ~~net~~advance ~~loss~~expenses ~~from~~to ~~investment~~related inparty ~~CEG~~on ofthe ~~$164,952~~consolidated ~~during~~balance ~~the year~~sheet ~~ended~~as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017. ~~and~~Management ~~classified~~believes ~~the~~that such amount tois berecoverable ~~reimbursed~~and tothat ~~the~~no ~~Company~~provision asis ~~advances~~necessary. toThe ~~related~~Company ~~party in the accompanying~~also ~~consolidated~~incurred ~~balance~~and ~~sheets.~~paid ~~Management~~business ~~believes~~related ~~that~~expenses ~~such amount is recoverable as~~ of ~~December 31~~$82,000 ~~2016~~to ~~and that no provision is necessary~~Acadian.

During ~~the~~fiscal year ~~ended December 31,~~ 2015, the Company paid $~~257~~156,~~573~~286 and ~~issued~~has ~~149~~accrued 58,~~004~~949 shares of its common stock valued at $~~150~~45,~~484~~218 to ~~Acadian~~be ~~Advisors~~issued, ~~and~~to ~~Associates~~Rome Finance Investissement (“~~Acadian~~Rome”), ~~a subsidiary of CEG,~~ for equity and debt issuance costs. ~~During~~Rome ~~the~~is ~~year~~a ~~ended~~subsidiary ~~December~~of ~~31,~~CEG. ~~2016,~~There ~~the~~are ~~Company~~no ~~incurred~~transactions ~~$352,003 to~~between ~~Acadian~~the ~~for equity issuance costs. The~~ Company ~~had outstanding balances due to Acadian of $124,576~~ and ~~$148,271~~Rome asduring the ofyears ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015, respectively~~2016.

~~During~~On January 19, 2016, the Company entered into a three-year ~~ended~~Consulting ~~December~~Agreement 31(the “Consulting Agreement”) with SF International Consulting Limited (“SF”), to ~~2015~~obtain the services of Slim Feriani, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer. SF International Consulting Limited is an entity controlled by Slim Feriani. Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, SF or Slim Feriani shall be paid a $~~156~~100,~~286~~000 signing bonus, and ~~has~~$50,000 ~~accrued~~a 58month for the duration of the Consulting Agreement. In addition,~~949~~ SF or Slim Feriani shall receive 23,333 shares of ~~its~~the Company’s Series A common stock ~~valued~~and ata ~~$45,218~~five-year stock option to bepurchase ~~issued~~750,000 toshares ~~Rome~~of ~~Finance Investissement~~the ~~(“Rome”)~~Company’s ~~for~~Series ~~equity~~A ~~and~~common ~~debt~~stock ~~issuance~~at ~~costs~~the price of $1.50 ~~Rome~~a isshare. Such option will vest annually at 250,000 shares a ~~subsidiary~~year. In addition, SF or Slim Feriani will receive each quarter during the term of ~~CEG.~~the ~~There~~Consulting ~~are~~Agreement noa ~~transactions~~five-year ~~between~~option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common shares at a price which is 110% of the last subscription price. Each such option will ~~and~~vest ~~Rome~~annually ~~during~~in equal amounts of 83,333 shares (83,334 shares on the ~~year~~third ~~ended~~anniversary). $432,750 of accrued compensation was due to SF as of December 31, 2017. In August 2016, in connection with Slim Feriani’s resignation as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Company also canceled its options issued to SF in accordance with the terms of the Consulting Agreement.

On January 19, 2016, the Company entered into a three-year Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with SF International Consulting Limited (“SF”), to obtain the services of Slim Feriani. Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, SF or Slim Feriani shall be paid a $100,000 signing bonus, and $50,000 a month for the duration of the Consulting Agreement. In addition, SF or Slim Feriani shall receive 23,333 shares of the Company’s common stock and a five-year stock option to purchase 750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the price of $1.50 a share. Such option will vest annually at 250,000 shares a year. In addition, SF or Slim Feriani will receive each quarter during the term of the Consulting Agreement a five-year option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common shares at a price which is 110% of the last subscription price. Each such option will vest annually in equal amounts of 83,333 shares (83,334 shares on the third anniversary). In August 2016, in connection with Slim Feriani’s resignation as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Company also canceled its options issued to SF in accordance with the terms of the Consulting Agreement. $432,750 of accrued compensation was due to SF as of December 31, 2016.26

On January 19, 2016, the Company entered ~~into~~ into a three-year Mutual Engagement Agreement with Gulf Central Agency Assets Management Ltd. (“GCA”), pursuant to ~~which~~ which GCA will provide the Company with advice on a non-exclusive basis on securing financing of ROI’s foreign real estate ventures. GCA will be paid GBP 25,000 per month, payable quarterly, and a success fee equal to 4% of the principal amount of any ~~investments~~ investments which GCA arranges with foreign investors. The Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, Slim Feriani, is the Chairman of GCA. In August 2016, in connection with Slim Feriani’s resignation as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Company also canceled its agreement with GCA. ~~The Company incurred~~ $~~305~~121,~~339~~615 of consulting fees toremained ~~GCA during the year ended December 31, 2016 of which $121,615 was~~ outstanding as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017.

23In February 2016, the Company received a total of $1,500,000 from Alternative Strategy Partners Pte. Ltd., a Singapore limited company (“ASP”), in connection with the Company’s Dubai Sobha Hartland Acquisition and Development Project (“Sobha Dubai Project”). Pursuant to an agreement between the parties dated February 24, 2016, the Company agreed to issue to ASP certain notes (“ASP notes”) which shall have a two year maturity, bear interest at 8% per annum payable quarterly and have a mortgage on the First Plot of the Sobha Dubai Project, subordinated to loans from banks or other institutional lenders, if such a lien is determined to be valid and enforceable under Dubai law, otherwise, the notes shall be secured by a lien, similarly subordinated, upon all of the stock of the ROI Land Investments Ltd., the beneficial owner of the Sobha Dubai Project. The ASP notes also contain an option either to convert all or part of its notes to the Company’s Series A common stock at $1.00 per share or to redeem all or part of its investment. Additionally, the ASP notes allowed ASP to receive certain profit participation of up to 50% of the net profits upon sale of the First Plot. On May 15, 2016, the Company received a termination letter from PNC terminating the agreement dated February 7, 2016 for non-payment of the amounts due under the agreement. As a result, the Company forfeited the deposits paid to PNC and defaulted on the ASP notes. The Company is currently in discussions with ASP to amend the terms of the notes. $399,219 and $279,219 of interest and fees were expensed and accrued for on the notes as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. On August 2, 2017, the Company also entered into a loan agreement with ASP which allows the Company to draw up to $300,000 at a 6% annual interest maturing on February 1, 2018. The loan balance as of December 31, 2017 was $200,000 and interest of $3,468 was expensed and outstanding. ASP is an entity owned by Yuhi Horiguchi, the Company’s CFO. During fiscal years 2017, total compensation paid to Mr. Horiguchi was $40,000.

On March 14, 2017, the Company entered into a short-term loan facility agreement between Kapito Canada, SAS (“Kapito”), a French company, with key terms including 6% annual interest payable monthly and an 8% upfront arrangement fee. This loan agreement extends to the Company a series of loan tranches, maturing every six months, totaling up to $1,078,261 (EUR 900,156) to be used for repayment of the Company’s existing mortgage loan dated October 9, 2015 and for general working capital. ROI DEV and its subsidiary 1016566 B.C. act as co-guarantors to this agreement in favor of the Company. Beginning in September 2017, the Company made extensions on all of its loan tranches resulting in an $865,833 (EUR 808,521) outstanding principal balance and $79,754 (EUR 62,731) accrued interest balance at December 31, 2017 with maturity dates through May 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company paid $148,862 in interest and fees to Kapito. Kapito is an entity controlled by Philippe Germain.

During fiscal year 2017, the Company made payments totaling $272,450 on behalf of ROI Tech in order to fund ROI Tech’s Dubai office rent payments. As of December 31, 2017, Stéphane Boivin is a 49% shareholder of ROI Tech and Company management believes that such amount is recoverable and that no provision is necessary. During fiscal year 2017, total compensation incurred for Stéphane Boivin was $275,000 of which $171,111 including business related expenses were outstanding at December 31, 2017.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 for professional services rendered by Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton ~~SENCRL and Marcum~~ LLP, with respect to the audits of our ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 financial statements, as well as their quarterly reviews of our interim financial statements and services normally provided by the independent accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods, were as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015
	2017		2016
Audit Fees - Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton SENCRL	$	135,900	$	–
Audit Fees and Audit-related Fees - Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP	$	131,437	$	190,835
Audit Fees and Audit-related Fees - Marcum LLP (1)		–		125,000
Total	$	135,900	$	125,000

(1) In 2016, the Company also paid $17,696 related to its quarterly review for the three months ended March 31, 2016, before the change of auditor announced in May 2017.

In the above table, "audit fees" are fees billed by our Company's external auditor for services provided in auditing our Company's annual financial statements for the subject year. "Audit-related fees" are fees not included in audit fees that are billed by the auditor for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit review of our company's financial statements.

InThe ~~2016, the~~ Company also ~~paid~~incurred $14,219 and $9,065 to Atwell SARL for the ~~audit~~ audits of ROI SEC for its fiscal ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Pre Approval Policies and Procedures

We do not have a separately designated Audit Committee. The Board of Directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Financial Statements

See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Description
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Company*
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Principal Executive Officer*
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Principal Financial Officer*
32.1	Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.2	Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document**
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Document**
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document**
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document**
101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document**
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document**

* Filed herewith.

** To be filed by amendment.29

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Index to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015	F-4
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015	F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015	F-9
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	F-8
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F-109

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

WeOpinion ~~have~~on ~~audited~~ the ~~accompanying~~ consolidated ~~balance~~ sheet of ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the year then ended. These financial statements ~~are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.~~

We ~~conducted~~have ~~our~~audited ~~audit~~the inaccompanying ~~accordance with the~~consolidated ~~standards~~balance sheets of ~~the~~ROI ~~Public~~Land ~~Company~~Investments ~~Accounting~~Ltd. ~~Oversight~~and ~~Board~~Subsidiaries (~~United~~the ~~States~~“Company”). ~~Those~~as ~~standards~~of ~~require~~December ~~that~~31, we2017 ~~plan~~ and ~~perform~~2016, ~~the~~and ~~audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether~~ the ~~financial~~related consolidated statements ~~are free~~ of ~~material~~operations ~~misstatement.~~and Wecomprehensive ~~were not engaged to perform~~loss, ancash ~~audit~~flows ofand ~~its~~stockholders’ ~~internal~~equity ~~control~~for ~~over~~the ~~financial~~years then ~~reporting.~~ended ~~Our~~and ~~audit~~the ~~included~~related ~~consideration~~notes of(collectively ~~internal~~referred ~~control~~to ~~over financial reporting~~ as athe ~~basis~~“financial ~~for~~statements”). ~~designing~~In ~~audit~~our ~~procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances~~opinion, ~~but not for~~ the ~~purpose~~financial ofstatements ~~expressing~~present anfairly, ~~opinion~~in onall ~~the~~material ~~effectiveness~~respects, of the ~~Company’s internal control over~~ financial ~~reporting.~~position ~~Accordingly,~~of ~~we express~~the noCompany ~~such~~as ~~opinion.~~of AnDecember ~~audit also includes examining~~31, on2017 aand ~~test basis~~2016, ~~evidence supporting the amounts~~ and ~~disclosures in~~ the ~~financial~~results ~~statements,~~of ~~assessing~~its ~~the~~operations ~~accounting principles used~~ and ~~significant~~its ~~estimates~~cash ~~made~~flows byfor ~~management,~~each asof ~~well as evaluating~~ the ~~overall~~years ~~financial~~then ~~statement~~ended, ~~presentation.~~in Weconformity ~~believe~~with ~~that~~accounting ~~our~~principles ~~audit~~generally accepted ~~provides~~in athe ~~reasonable~~United ~~basis~~States ~~for~~of ~~our opinion~~America.

InGoing our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.Concern

The accompanying ~~consolidated~~ financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company ~~had~~has incurred losses since inception, has a working capital deficiency and needs to raise additional funds to meet ~~its~~ its obligations and to sustain its operations. These conditions, along with other matters as set forth in Note 1, raise substantial ~~doubt~~ doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are ~~also~~ also described in Note 1. The ~~consolidated~~ financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

~~/s/~~Basis ~~Raymond~~for ~~Chabot Grant Thornton LLP~~opinion

~~Raymond~~These ~~Chabot~~financial ~~Grant~~statements ~~Thornton~~are ~~LLP~~the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP¹

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.

Montreal, Québec, Canada

~~December~~November 289, ~~2017~~2018

_________________________________

¹CPA auditor, CA public accountancy permit No. A121855

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully discussed in Note 1, the Company had incurred losses since inception, has a working capital deficiency and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcum LLP

New York, NY

April 12, 2016

F-3

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2016		2015
	2017		2016
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	~~557~~2,~~972~~129,740	$	~~424~~557,~~218~~972
Mortgage notes receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $443,354 and $-0- as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		–		443,354
Mortgage notes receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $443,354 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively		–		–
Notes receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $1,643,025 and $1,643,025 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively		–		–
Notes receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $1,643,025 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively		–		–
Advances to related party		21657,~~038~~706		~~185~~21,~~061~~038
Cash in escrow for interest payments		~~196~~179,~~162~~566		52196,~~166~~162
Acquisition deposit, related party		–		112,187
Prepaid expenses		181,843		–
Other current assets		1245,~~807~~445		~~258~~12,~~035~~807
Total current assets		~~787~~3,~~979~~194,300		1787,~~475,021~~979
Other assets:
Real estate held for development and sale		1516,~~748~~822,~~747~~550		1415,~~798~~748,~~000~~747
Deposits on land		–		3,148,032
Loans receivable from affiliate		4,911,779		–
Investment in cost-method investee		56,080		56,080
Other assets, net		21,248		73,293
Intangible asset		525,000		–
Total other assets		15,826,075		18,075,405
Other assets, net		280,426		21,248
Total assets	$	16,614,054	$	19,550,426
Total other assets		22,595,835		15,826,075
Total assets	$	25,790,135	$	16,614,054

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-43

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	56,~~053~~552,~~134~~652		$	15,~~973~~053,~~512~~134
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discounts, current		1,~~420~~450,~~123~~000			1,~~457~~297,~~068~~405
Mortgage note payable		2,215,520			865,080
Mortgage notes and loans payable, net of debt discounts, current		4,246,580			4,980,520
Loans payable		4,265,000			3,765,000
Performance-linked notes payable, net of debt discounts, current		3,530,915			–
Loans from related parties		709,131			486,528
Deposits on notes payable, net of issuance costs		12,531,348			5,588,227
Deposits on notes payable, net of issuance costs		5,588,227			3,741,821
Loans from related parties		3,115,643			2,209,131
Total current liabilities		19,251,135			12,289,009
Loans payable		424,280			–
Other liabilities
Derivative liability		649,000			–
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discounts, noncurrent		3,116,547			2,892,047
Profit participation liability		–			122,718
Mortgage note payable		1,513,441			–
Total current liabilities		32,500,418			19,251,135
Performance-linked notes payable, net of debt discounts		3,392,458			3,431,692
Non-current liabilities:
Total liabilities		27,273,581			18,612,748
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discounts		2,995,479			3,116,547
Mortgage notes and loans payable, net of debt discounts		6,994,817			1,513,441
Performance-linked notes payable, net of debt discounts		–			3,392,458
Total non-current liabilities		9,990,296			8,022,446
Total liabilities		42,490,714			27,273,581
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Non-controlling interest in consolidated entity		2,364,224			–
Preferred stock, Series A, 30,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.0001, 200,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and no shares issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2015		20			–
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, Series B, 20,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.0001, 2,239,226 shares issued and 3,368,782 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and no shares issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2015		337			–
Preferred stock, Series A, 30,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.0001, 100,000 shares issued and 200,000 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 200,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016		30			20
Common stock, Series A, 160,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.0001, 56,061,072 shares issued and 53,971,846 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 50,615,397 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015, respectively		5,606			5,062
Preferred stock, Series B, 20,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.0001, 2,239,226 shares issued and 6,935,712 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2,239,226 shares issued and 3,368,782 shares outstanding as of December 31, 20.16		694			337
Common stock, Series B, 40,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.0001, no shares issued or outstanding		–			–
Common stock, Series A, 160,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.0001, 53,501,846 shares issued and 55,901,042 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 56,061,072 shares issued and 53,971,846 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016, respectively		5,976			5,606
Additional paid-in capital		26,839,938			20,035,692
Common stock, Series B, 40,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.0001, no shares issued or outstanding		–
Preferred stock issuable		573,802			–
Additional paid-in capital		26,171,861			26,839,938
Treasury stock		(209	)		–
Stock issuable		3,748,957			573,802
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,852,668	)		(2,086,207	)
Treasury stock		(396	)		(209	)
Accumulated deficit		(36,226,353	)		(17,016,869	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,959,669	)		(1,852,668	)
Total stockholders' equity		(10,659,527	)		937,678
Accumulated deficit		(47,032,256	)		(36,226,353	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	16,614,054		$	19,550,426
Total stockholders’ equity		(19,064,803	)		(10,659,527	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	25,790,135		$	16,614,054

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-54

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Revenue:
Interest income, net	$	–		$	119,523
Interest income	$	43,433		$	–
Operating expenses:
Compensation		~~652~~615,~~797~~448			~~320~~652,~~542~~797
Consulting fees		63,~~877~~072,~~696~~431			56,~~240~~877,~~029~~696
Professional fees		1820,~~402,495~~288			1,~~239~~402,~~614~~495
Travel expenses		1217,~~132,413~~287			~~903~~1,~~067~~132,413
Abandoned project costs		5,620,555			351,183
Impairment loss		972,097			–
Provision for loan losses		501,529			1,775,029
Abandoned project costs		–			5,620,555
General and administrative expenses		1,045,500			797,801
Provision for loan losses		–			501,529
Total operating expenses		17,232,985			10,627,265
General and administrative expenses		1,016,720			1,045,500
Loss from operations		(17,232,985	)		(10,507,742	)
Total operating expenses		6,714,271			17,232,985
Loss from operations		(6,670,838	)		(17,232,985	)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(2,~~174~~712,~~615~~398	)		(12,~~370~~174,~~122~~615	)
Gain on extinguishment of debt		–			83,449
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss)		(924,223	)		198,116
Foreign currency transaction gain		198,116			77,754
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(37,000	)		–
Total other expense		(13,~~976~~673,~~499~~621	)		(1,~~208~~976,~~919~~499	)
Loss before income taxes		(19,209,484	)		(11,716,661	)
Net loss	$	(10,344,459	)	$	(19,209,484	)
Provision for income taxes		–			–
Net loss per share – basic and diluted	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.36	)
Net loss	$	(19,209,484	)	$	(11,716,661	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – Basic and Diluted	$	56,270,222		$	53,749,863
Net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.26	)
Net loss	$	(10,344,459	)	$	(19,209,484	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - Basic and Diluted		53,749,863			45,238,139
Net loss attributable to non-controlling consolidated entity		–			–
Net loss	$	(19,209,484	)	$	(11,716,661	)
Net loss attributable to ROI Land Investments Ltd.	$	(10,344,459	)	$	(19,209,484	)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		~~233~~61,~~539~~030			(1233,~~644,468~~539	)
Total comprehensive loss	$	(1810,~~975~~283,~~945~~429	)	$	(1318,~~361~~975,~~129~~945	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-65

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1910,~~209~~344,~~484~~459	)	$	(1119,~~716~~209,~~661~~484	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Amortization		1223,~~615~~637			12,~~696~~615
Stock based compensation		2(55,~~282,285~~399	)		2,~~434~~282,~~438~~285
Stock issued for services		531,~~200~~100,000			–53,200
Amortization of debt issuance costs		~~318~~323,~~457~~394			~~340~~318,~~784~~457
Accretion of debt discount on convertible notes payable		~~103~~80,~~240~~676			~~102~~103,~~958~~240
Accretion of profit participation discount on convertible notes payable		46(51,~~151~~480	)		6546,~~714~~151
Provision for loan losses		501,529			1,775,029
Accretion of interest on convertible notes payable		612,000			–
Write off of acquisition deposit, related party		112,187			–
Change in fair value of derivative liability		37,000			–
Gain on extinguishment of debt		–			(83,449	)
Impairment loss		972,097			–
Abandoned project costs		5,620,555			–
Provision for loan losses		–			501,529
Unrealized foreign exchange gain		(599,429	)		–
Write off of acquisition deposit, related party		–			112,187
Abandoned project costs		–			5,620,555
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)		884,931			(599,429	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Notes receivable		~~(58,175~~–	)		(158,~~047,621~~175	)
Interest receivable		~~36,571~~–			~~(31~~36,~~580~~571	)
Cash in escrow for interest payments		(143,996	)		272,230
Advances to related parties		(911,668	)		164,023
Acquisition deposit, related party		–			(112,187	)
Cash in escrow for interest payments		16,596			(143,996	)
Other current assets		~~208~~(32,~~658~~638	)		~~(183~~208,~~508~~658	)
Real estate held for development and sale		(2418,~~603,422~~802	)		(32,~~935~~603,~~039~~422	)
Deposits on land		–			(3,148,032	)
Prepaid expenses		(181,843	)		–
Other assets		(230,360	)		(39,288	)
Other non-current assets		(282,815	)		(230,360	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		3(95,~~079,619~~521	)		~~818~~3,~~836~~079,619
Net cash used in operating activities		(108,~~469~~324,~~799~~294	)		(1410,~~474~~305,~~680~~776	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Advance to related party		164,023			(185,061	)
Loans receivable from affiliate		(4,911,779	)		–
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		164,023			(185,061	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(4,911,779	)		–
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on convertible notes payable		~~(115,000~~–	)		(~~395~~115,~~569~~000	)
Proceeds from the issuance of mortgage note payable		3,397,222			865,080
Proceeds from the issuance of mortgage notes and loans payable		5,851,320			3,397,222
Payments on mortgage notes payable		(416,142	)		–
Payments on mortgage notes and loans payable		(1,600,405	)		(416,142	)
Proceeds from the issuance of loans payable		~~500~~424,~~000~~294			~~415~~500,000
Payment of loans payable		–			(1,160,865	)
Proceeds from loans from related parties		1,065,883			222,603
Proceeds from loans from related parties		222,603			284,643
Payments on loans from related parties		(363,822	)		–
Payments on loans from related parties		–			(86,475	)
Proceeds from deposits for notes payable, net of cash issuance costs		6,150,474			2,162,500
Proceeds from deposits for notes payable, net of cash issuance costs		703,422			3,931,131
Proceeds from issuance of performance-linked notes payable		–			(112,200	)
Proceeds from issuance of performance-linked notes payable, net of cash issuance costs		(1,900,000	)		3,003,009
Contributions from non-controlling interest holders in consolidated entity		1,734,750			–
Payments on performance-linked notes payable		(112,200	)		–
Proceeds from issuance of Series B preferred stock		–			377,999
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of cash issuance costs		377,999			–
Proceeds from deposits of Series B preferred stock issuable, net of issuance costs		1,535,710			573,915
Proceeds from deposits of preferred stock issuable, net of cash issuance costs		573,915			–
Proceeds from sale of Series A common stock		–			3,847,031
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of cash issuance costs		3,847,031			7,666,949
Net cash provided by financing activities		14,798,204			10,437,928
Net cash provided by financing activities		10,437,928			14,522,903
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		9,637			1,602
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		1,602			(184,765	)
Net increase in cash		1,571,768			133,754
Net increase (decrease) in cash		133,754			(321,603	)
Cash at beginning of year		557,972			424,218
Cash at beginning of year		424,218			745,821
Cash at end of year	$	2,129,740		$	557,972
Cash at end of year	$	557,972		$	424,218

Continued

7F-6

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
Cash paid for interest	$	12,~~237~~030,~~936~~206		$	~~840~~1,~~959~~237,936
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flows investing and financing activities:
Acquisition of land held for development:
Colorado seller note accrued interest and penalties converted to note principal:
Real estate held for development and sale	$	–		$	(3,350,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	328,667		$	–
Loans payable	$	–(328,667	)	$	~~3,350,000~~–
Assumption of mortgage notes receivable:
Cancellation of Series A common stock previously issued to related party:
Mortgage notes receivable	$	–		$	(288,360	)
Common stock	$	94		$	–
Interest receivable	$	–		$	(12,973	)
Additional paid-in capital	$	274,906		$	–
Loans from related parties	$	–(275,000	)	$	~~288,360~~–
Accrued interest	$	–		$	12,973
Series A preferred stock issuable for service:
Accrued issuance costs:
Consulting fees	$	100,000		$	–
Deferred debt issuance costs	$	–		$	–
Preferred stock	$	(10	)	$	–
Performance-linked notes payable, net of discount costs	$	–		$	(43,205	)
Stock issuable	$	(99,900	)	$	–
Deposits on notes payable	$	–		$	(2,013	)
Series B preferred stock issuable for service:
Additional paid in capital	$	–		$	(162,353	)
Consulting fees	$	1,000,000		$	–
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	–		$	207,571
Preferred stock	$	(100	)	$	–
Stock issuable	$	(999,900	)	$	–
Series A preferred stock issued in exchange for common stock:
Common stock	$	~~(20~~–	)	$	–(20	)
Series A preferred stock	$	20–		$	–20
Series B preferred stock issued in exchange for common stock:
Series B preferred stock issued (issuable) in exchange for common stock:
Common stock	$	(~~189~~101	)	$	–(189	)
Series B preferred stock	$	~~189~~101		$	–189
Series A preferred stock issued for debt issuance costs:
Series B preferred stock issued (issuable) for debt issuance costs:
Preferred stock	$	(352	)	$	–(35	)
Additional paid in capital	$	~~(94,465~~–	)	$	–(94,465	)
Deferred debt issuance costs	$	94,500		$	–
Stock issuable	$	(15,998	)	$	–
Common stock issued for debt issuance costs:
Deferred debt issuance costs	$	16,000		$	94,500
Performance-linked notes payable, net of discount costs	$	–		$	(46,804	)
Series A common stock issued for services:
Deposits on notes payable	$	–		$	(156,436	)
Common stock	$	–		$	(4	)
Additional paid in capital (equity issuance costs)	$	–		$	(392,254	)
Additional paid in capital	$	–		$	(53,196	)
Common stock	$	–		$	69
Compensation expense	$	–		$	53,200
Additional paid in capital	$	–		$	595,425
Series A common stock issuable for notes payable conversion:
Common stock issued for payment of accrued expenses as December 31, 2014:
Convertible notes payable, net of debt discounts	$	298,225		$	–
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	–		$	(428,328	)
Performance-linked notes payable, net of debt discounts	$	–		$	150,000
Common stock	$	–(370	)	$	~~123~~(2	)
Additional paid in capital	$	–		$	428,205
Stock issuable	$	(297,855	)	$	–
Common stock issued for services:
Additional paid in capital	$	–		$	(149,998	)
Common stock	$	(4	)	$	–
Additional paid in capital	$	(53,196	)	$	–
Compensation expense	$	53,200		$	–
Notes payable converted to common stock:
Notes payable	$	(150,000	)	$	–
Common stock	$	2		$	–
Additional paid in capital	$	149,888		$	–
Common stock cancelled:
Common stock	$	–		$	(50	)
Additional paid in capital	$	–		$	(174,950	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	–		$	175,000

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-87

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note Series

Preferred stock

Common stock, Series A

Additional paid-in

Preferred stock

Treasury

Accumulated other comprehensive

Accumulated

Total stockholders’

Preferred stock

Common stock, Series A

Additional paid-in

Stock

Treasury

Accumulated other comprehensive

Accumulated

Total stockholders’

Amount

capital

issuable

stock

loss

deficit

equity

Amount

capital

issuable

stock

loss

deficit

equity

Balance, December 31, 2014

–

39,619,219

3,962

9,641,190

–

(441,739

)

(5,300,208

)

3,903,205

Common stock issued for cash

–

7,393,580

739

7,919,561

–

7,920,300

Common stock issued for services

–

2,186,745

219

1,648,659

–

1,648,878

Common stock issued for accrued consulting services as of December 31, 2014

–

1,224,242

123

428,205

–

428,328

Common stock issued for debt issuance costs

–

164,605

203,224

–

203,240

Common stock issued for equity issuance costs

527,006

392,201

–

392,254

Cancellation of share previously issued for services

–

(500,000

)

(50

)

(174,950

)

–

(175,000

)

Common stock issuance costs

–

(807,958

)

–

(807,958

)

Warrant expense

–

477,250

–

477,250

Stock option expense

–

308,310

–

308,310

Foreign currency translation loss

–

(1,644,468

)

(1,644,468

)

Net loss

–

(11,716,661

)

(11,716,661

)

Balance, December 31, 2015

–

50,615,397

5,062

20,035,692

–

(2,086,207

)

(17,016,869

)

937,678

Series A Preferred stock issued in exchange for common stock

200,000

–

Series A Preferred stock issued in exchange for Series A common stock

200,000

–

Series B Preferred stock issued for cash

1,889,226

189

–

377,810

–

377,999

Series B Preferred Stock issued for debt issuance costs

350,000

–

94,465

–

94,500

Preferred stock issuable for cash

1,129, 556

113

–

573,802

–

573,915

Series B Preferred stock issuable for cash

1,129, 556

113

–

573,802

–

573,915

Common stock issued for cash

–

5,280,381

528

4,049,710

–

4,050,238

Common stock issued for services

–

43,333

53,196

–

53,200

Notes payable converted to common stock

–

121,961

149,988

–

150,000

Common stock held in treasury

–

(2,089,226

)

–

(209

)

–

(209

)

Common stock issuance costs

–

(203,208

)

–

(203,208

)

Stock based compensation expense

–

2,282,285

–

2,282,285

Foreign currency translation loss

–

233,539

–

233,539

Foreign currency translation gain

–

233,539

–

233,539

Net loss

–

(19,209,484

)

(19,209,484

)

Balance, December 31, 2016

3,568,782

357

53,971,846

5,606

26,839,938

573,802

(209

)

(1,852,668

)

(36,226,353

)

(10,659,527

)

Series A preferred stock issuable for services

100,000

–

99,990

–

100,000

Series B preferred stock issuable for cash

1,542,000

154

–

1,541,846

–

1,542,000

Series B preferred stock issuable in exchange for Series A common stock and cash

1,008,930

101

–

219,566

–

219,667

Series B preferred stock issuable for debt issuance costs

16,000

–

15,998

–

16,000

Series B preferred stock issuable for services

1,000,000

100

–

999,900

–

1,000,000

Series B preferred stock held in treasury

(100,000

)

–

(10

)

–

(10

)

Series B preferred stock issuance costs

–

(225,957

)

–

(225,957

)

Series A common stock issuable for notes payable conversion

–

3,702,953

370

–

297,855

–

298,225

Common stock held in treasury

–

(1,773,757

)

–

(386,721

)

–

(177

)

–

(386,898

)

Common stock issuance costs

–

Stock based compensation

–

(55,399

)

–

(55,399

)

Foreign currency translation gain

–

61,030

–

61,030

Adjustment to redemption value of minority interest

–

(168,031

)

(461,444

)

(629,475

)

Net loss

–

(10,344,459

)

(10,344,459

)

Balance, December 31, 2017

7,135,712

724

55,901,042

5,976

26,171,861

3,748,957

(396

)

(1,959,669

)

(47,032,256

)

(19,064,803

)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-98

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 1 – Business and Going Concern

Business

ROI Land Investments Ltd. was incorporated in Nevada on December 13, 2007 under the name Conex MD, Inc.

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries specializes in land development opportunities in North America and internationally. The Company's business model consists of acquiring attractive land, optimizing zoning restrictions, obtaining the necessary permits, outsourcing developments of the infrastructure and profiting from the sale of the subdivided land units to established residential and commercial building developers. Our business model also consists of providing financing opportunities to qualified joint venture partners.

On November 15, 2013, the Company formed ROI DEV Canada Inc. (“ROI DEV”), a Canada Chartered corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. ROI DEV was formed to acquire and manage land acquisitions in North America.

On ~~November~~October 317, ~~2015~~2014, the Company formed ~~9497846~~ ~~Canada~~1016566 ~~Inc~~B.C. Ltd. (“~~9497846~~1016566 ~~Canada~~B.C.”), a British Columbia (Canada) corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. ~~9497846~~of ~~Canada~~ROI DEV. 1016566 B.C. was formed to ~~provide management~~ownership ~~services~~of to the Company’s ~~operating~~acquired ~~companies.~~properties ~~This~~located ~~subsidiary~~in isBritish ~~currently inactive~~Columbia.

On November 3, 2015, the Company formed 9497846 Canada Inc. (“9497846 Canada”), a Canada corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROI DEV. 9497846 Canada was formed to provide management services to the Company’s operating companies. This subsidiary is currently inactive and was dissolved in April 2018.

On March 2317, 2016, the Company ~~formed~~organized ROI Land Investments AG (“ROI ~~Securitization SA~~Swiss”), a ~~Luxembourg~~Swiss corporation as a wholly-owned subsidiary. ROI ~~Securitization~~Swiss SA was ~~formed~~organized to provide ~~sell~~investor ~~debt~~relations ~~securities~~services ~~in Europe~~ to ~~fund~~ the Company’s ~~land~~investors and ~~real~~potential ~~estate~~investors ~~projects~~in Europe and was dissolved in May 2017.

On March 21, 2018, the Company formed HLST 1 Holding Limited (“HLST1”), a UAE corporation, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. HLST1 was formed to hold the Company’s equity interest in FL2, which shall own and develop the Swarovski Towers building in Dubai.

Going Concern

The Company has incurred net losses of $1910,~~209~~344,~~484~~ 459 and $1119,~~716~~209,~~661~~484 for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, and has incurred cumulative losses since inception of $3647,~~226~~032,~~353 and $17,016,869 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively~~256. The Company has a deficit in working capital of ~~$18,463,156~~ ~~and~~ $1029,~~813~~306,~~988~~118 as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015, respectively, and~~ used cash in operations of $108,~~469~~324,~~799~~294 ~~and $14,474,680~~ for the ~~years~~year ended December 31, ~~2016 and 2015, respectively~~2017. These conditions ~~indicate~~raise ~~the~~substantial ~~existence of a material uncertainty that may cast a significant~~ doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern and the ability to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on the execution of management’s plans, which include the raising of capital through the debt and/or equity markets, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements.F-9

There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating additional cash from the equity/debt markets or other sources to be used for operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary if the going concern assumption was not appropriate. Based on the Company’s current resources, the Company will not be able to continue to operate without additional immediate funding. Should the Company not be successful in obtaining the necessary financing to fund its operations, the Company would need to curtail certain or all operational activities and/or contemplate the sale of its assets, as necessary.

F-10

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 1 – Business and Going Concern (Continued)

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern and the ability to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on the execution of management’s plans, which include the raising of capital through the debt and/or equity markets, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements.

There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating additional cash from the equity/debt markets or other sources to be used for operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of assets and liabilities that might be necessary if the going concern assumption was not appropriate. Based on the Company’s current resources, the Company will not be able to continue to operate without additional immediate funding. Should the Company not be successful in obtaining the necessary financing to fund its operations, the Company would need to curtail certain or all operational activities and/or contemplate the sale of its assets, as necessary.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements ~~include~~ include the accounts of ROI Land Investments Ltd. and its wholly-owned Subsidiaries, ROI DEV Canada Inc., 1016566 B.C. Ltd., 93391993 Quebec Inc., 9497846 Canada Inc. (dissolved April 2018), ROI Land Investments FZ, ~~and~~ROI Land Investments AG (until dissolution in May 2017), ROI ~~Securitization~~Securitisation SA and of a variable interest entity (VIE), ROI Land Colorado et New York Soho (a French-registered limited partnership) (“ROI SCA”). ROI SCA is a limited partnership by share in which ROI DEV is the general partner and manager. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Reclassifications

Certain items on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on the previously reported net loss.

Out-of-period Adjustment

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company identified and recorded an immaterial error related to the bifurcation of a derivative on the Beauport Convertible Notes Payable. Upon issuance of the notes, a derivate would be bifurcated from the notes payable and subsequently be adjusted to its fair value at the end of each reporting period. A corresponding discount on the notes payable would have been recorded when the notes were issued and accreted back to their face value over the original term of the notes.

Accordingly, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment for the derivative for the period related to fiscal years 2014 through 2016 and recognized a derivative liability of $589,000 on the consolidated balance sheet, a change in fair value of derivative liability of $23,000 (favorable) and accretion interest of $452,000 in the consolidated statement of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a change in fair value of derivative liability of $60,000 (unfavorable) and an additional accretion interest of $160,000, resulting in a derivative liability of $649,000 as of December 31, 2017 and the notes payable being accreted back to their face value.

The Company assessed the materiality of this adjustment and concluded the adjustment was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements of the current period or of any previous period since inception of these notes.

F-10

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The most significant estimates, among other things, are used in accounting for allowances for deferred income taxes, contingencies, profit participation liability as well as the recording and presentation of its common stock and related stock option issuances. Estimates and assumptions are periodically reviewed and the effects of any material revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period that they are determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid ~~investments~~ investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. AsAt of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, the Company ~~had~~ had no cash equivalents.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains cash in bank accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and periodically evaluates the credit worthiness of the financial institutions and has determined the credit exposure to be negligible.

~~Other~~Intangible ~~Assets~~asset

~~Other~~The ~~assets~~Company’s asdesign ~~of December 31, 2016~~ and ~~2015~~licensing ~~consisted~~agreement ofwith ~~website~~Swarovski ~~setup~~is ~~costs and publicity campaign costs and are~~ recorded ~~at cost and construction in progress for leasehold improvements in Dubai which was fully impaired~~ as ofintangible ~~December~~assets ~~31,~~and ~~2016~~is ~~(Refer~~subject to ~~Note~~amortization ~~5).~~using ~~Amortization expense of $12,615 and $12,696 for~~ the ~~years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, on these other assets is computed by the~~ straight-line method ~~(after taking into account their respective estimated residual values)~~ over the duration ~~assets~~of ~~estimated~~the ~~useful~~agreement, ~~lives~~or asover ~~follows:~~12 years.

Depreciable Assets

Depreciable assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 included website setup costs and office furniture which are recorded at cost under other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Leasehold improvements in Dubai were fully impaired during fiscal year 2016 (Refer to Note 5). Amortization expense of $12,973 and $12,615 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, on these depreciable assets were computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful lives as follows:

Website setup

5 years

~~Publicity~~Office ~~campaign~~furniture 3 years

F-11

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 2 – Summary of Significant ~~Accounting~~ Accounting Policies (~~continued~~Continued)

Deposits on Land

Deposits and other acquisition and investment pursuit costs related to deals in progress as of the reporting date are included in the consolidated balance sheets as deposits on land. These costs will be capitalized as part of the original investment upon closing of the purchase of the related investment or, to the extent that such costs have not been recovered, expensed at the time the decision is made not to proceed with the investment.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which fair value is observable:

Level 1 - fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 - fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and

Level 3 - fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

Fair value estimates discussed herein are ~~based~~ based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company applied the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurement” for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Convertible Instruments

U.S. GAAP requires companies to bifurcate ~~conversion~~ conversion options and certain other features from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur, and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument. An exception to this rule is when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional, as that term is described under applicable U.S. GAAP. The Company has no ~~bifurcated~~recorded a derivative ~~instruments~~liability of $649,000 as of December 31, 2017 (2016: ~~and~~$-0-) ~~2015~~related to certain notes payable (Refer to Note 2, Out-of-period Adjustment).

When the Company has determined that the ~~embedded~~ embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, the Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of the conversion options embedded in the debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their stated date of redemption. The Company has not recorded any beneficial conversion feature as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 as the embedded conversion options in its notes payable do not meet the firm commitment criterion as described under applicable U.S. GAAP.

Equity

Common stock and preferred stock represent the par value of the total number of shares issued by the Company. If shares are issued when options and warrants are exercised, the common stock account also comprises the compensation costs previously recorded as additional paid-in-capital. If shares are issued ~~within~~upon the exercise of the conversion option onrelated ~~convertible~~to ~~instruments~~the isconvertible ~~exercise~~instruments, the common stock account also comprises the equity component of the convertible instruments.

F-12

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 2 – Summary of Significant ~~Accounting~~ Accounting Policies (~~continued~~Continued)

Additional paid-in-capital includes charges related to the fair value of share options and warrants until such equity instruments are exercised, in which case the amounts are transferred to common stock. If convertible instruments are not exercised at the expiry of the convertible instruments, the equity component of the convertible instrument is transferred to additional paid-in-capital.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss comprises foreign currency translation difference arising form the translation of financial statements of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in U.S. dollar. Deficit includes all current and prior losses.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

The Company accounts for the impairment or or disposal of long-lived assets according to ASC 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment”. ASC 360 clarifies the accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of, including the disposal of business segments and major lines of business. Long-lived assets are reviewed when facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. When necessary, impaired assets are written down to estimated fair value based on the best information available. Estimated fair value is generally based on either appraised value or measured by discounting estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. The Company has recorded noan impairment loss during ~~the~~year ~~years~~ ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 ~~and~~on ~~2015~~its ~~except~~Beauport ~~for~~project ~~an amount related to Dubai leasehold improvements~~ (Refer to Note 5).

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for Stock-Based Compensation under ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”, which addresses the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, with a primary focus on transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share- based payment transactions. ASC 718-10 requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Incremental compensation costs arising from subsequent modifications of awards after the grant date must be recognized. The Company treats stock-based transactions with its non-employee directors as if they were employees.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation awards to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Under ASC 505-50, the Company determines the fair value of the warrants or stock-based compensation awards granted as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Any stock options or warrants issued to non- employees are recorded in expense and additional paid-in capital in shareholders' equity (deficit) over the applicable service periods using variable accounting through the vesting dates based on the fair value of the options or warrants at the end of each period.

The Company issues common stock to consultants for various services. The costs for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of such common stock is measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. The Company recognizes a consulting expense and a corresponding increase to additional paid-in-capital related to common stock issued for services.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, future tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements as carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantially enacted income tax rates expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability settled. The effect of a change in income tax rates on future income tax liabilities and assets is recognized in income in the period that the change occurs. Future income tax assets are recognized to the extent that they are considered more likely than not to be realized.

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.

F-13

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 2 – Summary of Significant ~~Accounting~~ Accounting Policies (~~continued~~Continued)

~~Management~~Income has evaluated and concluded that there were no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company does not expect any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits within twelve months of the reporting date.Taxes

~~The~~Income ~~Company’s~~taxes ~~policy~~are isaccounted tofor ~~classify~~under ~~assessments,~~the ifliability ~~any,~~method of accounting for ~~tax~~income ~~related~~taxes. ~~interest~~Under asthe ~~interest~~liability ~~expense~~method, deferred tax liabilities and ~~penalties~~assets asare ~~general~~recognized for ~~and~~the ~~administrative~~expected ~~expenses~~future tax consequences attributable to differences between the amounts reported in the consolidated ~~statements~~financial ofstatements ~~operations.~~as ~~The~~carrying ~~Company~~amounts ~~has~~of ~~not~~assets ~~filed~~and ~~any~~liabilities ~~federal~~and their respective tax ~~returns~~bases. ~~since~~Deferred ~~inception~~tax assets and ~~may~~liabilities beare measured ~~subject~~using toenacted ~~failure-to-file~~income ~~penalties. The~~tax ~~Company~~rates ~~estimates~~expected ~~that~~to apply when the ~~amount~~asset ofis ~~penalties,~~realized ifor ~~any,~~the ~~will~~liability ~~not~~settled. ~~have~~The effect of a change ~~material~~in ~~effect~~income tax rates on ~~its~~deferred ~~financial~~income ~~position,~~tax ~~results of~~liabilities ~~operations~~and orassets ~~cash~~is ~~flows~~recognized in income in the period that the change occurs. NoDeferred ~~provisions~~income ~~have~~tax ~~been~~assets ~~made~~are inrecognized to the ~~consolidated~~extent ~~financial~~that ~~statements~~they ~~for~~are ~~such~~considered ~~penalties,~~more iflikely ~~any~~than not to be realized.

The Company ~~intends~~adopted tothe ~~prepare~~provisions ~~and~~of ~~file overdue~~ASC ~~United~~Topic ~~States~~740 ~~federal~~“Income ~~tax returns through 2016~~Taxes”, which ~~are~~prescribes ~~anticipated~~a torecognition bethreshold ~~completed~~ and ~~filed~~measurement byprocess ~~the~~for ~~end~~financial ~~of first quarter of~~statement ~~fiscal~~recognition ~~2018. The Company also files annual tax returns in Canada for ROI DEV~~ and inmeasurement ~~Luxembourg~~of ~~for~~a ~~ROI SEC. ROI DEV has filed its~~ tax ~~returns~~position ~~through~~taken ~~2016~~or ~~and~~expected ~~ROI SEC intends~~ to ~~complete~~be ~~and~~taken toin ~~file~~a ~~its 2016~~ tax return ~~by the end of first quarter of fiscal 2018~~.

Management has evaluated and concluded that there were no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company does not expect any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits within twelve months of the reporting date.

The Company’s policy is to classify assessments, if any, for tax related interest as interest expense and penalties as general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company has not filed any United States tax returns since inception and may be subject to failure-to-file penalties. The Company estimates that the amount of penalties, if any, will not have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. No provisions have been made in the consolidated financial statements for such penalties, if any.

The Company intends to prepare and file overdue United States federal tax returns through fiscal year 2017, which are anticipated to be completed and filed by mid fiscal 2019. The Company also files annual tax returns in Canada and Germany for ROI DEV, in Canada for 1016566 B.C. Ltd., 93391993 Quebec Inc. and 9497846 Canada Inc., and in Luxembourg for ROI SEC. ROI DEV has filed its tax returns in Canada through 2017 and plans to complete its 2017 tax returns in Germany by the end of fiscal year 2018. 1016566 B.C. Ltd., 9497846 Canada Inc. and ROI SEC intend to complete and to file their respective 2017 tax returns by the end of fiscal year 2018.

Revenue Recognition

The development time of our properties is generally more than one year from when development of the property begins, although some properties may take less than one year to complete. Revenues and cost of revenues from these property sales are recorded at the time each property parcel is delivered and title and possession are transferred to the buyer.

Income from the sales of mortgage notes receivable are reported on an accrual basis using the effective interest rate method.

Interest income on notes and ~~mortgage~~loans ~~notes~~ receivable are recognized when earned per the terms of the applicable ~~note~~ agreements.

Mortgage Notes and Loans Receivable

Mortgage notes ~~receivable~~and ~~will~~loans bereceivable ~~considered~~are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms. Management ~~will~~assesses ~~assess~~ the credit quality of the portfolio and adequacy of loan loss reserves on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as necessary. Significant judgment of management ~~will be required~~is required in this analysis. We ~~will~~ consider the estimated net recoverable value of the estimated net recoverable value as well as other factors, including but not limited to the fair value of any collateral, the amount and the status of any senior debt, the quality and financial condition of the borrower and the competitive situation of the area where the underlying collateral is located. Because this determination may be based on projections of future economic events, which are inherently subjective, the amount ultimately realized may differ materially from the carrying value as of the balance sheet date. If upon completion of the assessment, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral is less than the net carrying value of the debt investment, a loan loss reserve ~~will~~is be recorded with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses. The loan loss reserve for each debt investment will be maintained at a level that is determined to be adequate by management to absorb probable losses.

Income recognition will be suspended for a debt investment at the earlier of the date at which payments become past due or when, in the opinion of management, a full recovery of income and principal becomes doubtful. When the ultimate collectability of the principal of an impaired debt investment is in doubt, all payments will be applied to principal under the cost recovery method. When the ultimate collectability of the principal of an impaired debt investment is not in doubt, contractual interest will be recorded as interest income when received, under the cash basis method, until an accrual is resumed when the debt investment becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed. A debt investment will be written off when it is no longer realizable or is legally discharged.

F-14

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 2 – Summary of Significant ~~Accounting~~ Accounting Policies (~~continued~~Continued)

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. The U.S. Dollar is the functional currency of the Company and ROI FZ, the Canadian Dollar is the functional currency of ROI DEV, ~~and~~ 9497846 Canada Inc., 93391993 Quebec Inc. and 1016566 B.C., while the Euro is the functional currency of ROI SEC and ROI SCA. Foreign currency transactions are translated into the Company’s functional currency, using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the remeasurement of monetary items denominated in foreign currency at year-end exchange rates are recognized in profit or loss.

Non-monetary items are not retranslated at year-end and are measured at historical cost using the exchange rates at the transaction date, except for non-monetary items measured at fair value which are translated using the exchange rates at the date when fair value was determined.

Foreign Operations

On consolidation, assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated based on the exchange rates as of the consolidated balance sheet date, while revenue and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates. The resulting translation gain and loss adjustments are accumulated as a component of stockholders’ equity and other comprehensive income.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company reports comprehensive income (loss) and its components in its consolidated financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments affecting stockholders’ equity that, under U.S. GAAP, are excluded from net loss.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the exchange rate between U.S. Dollars and Canadian Dollar was U.S. $1.00 = CAD 1.~~3467~~2554, and the average exchange rate for the year then ended was U.S. $1.00 = CAD 1.~~3245~~2879. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the exchange rate between U.S. Dollars and Canadian Dollar was U.S. $1.00 = CAD 1.~~3872~~3467, and the average exchange rate for the year then ended was U.S. $1.00 = CAD 1.~~3389~~3245.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the exchange rate between U.S. Dollars and Euro was U.S. $1.00 = EUR 0.~~9492~~8348, and the average exchange rate for the year then ended was U.S. $1.00 = EUR 0.8917. As of December 31, 2016, the exchange rate between U.S. Dollars and Euro was U.S. $1.00 = EUR 0.9492, and the average exchange rate for the year then ended was U.S. $1.00 = EUR 0.9035.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The Company computes income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share", which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the consolidated statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were $4,745,479 and $4,860,479 of convertible notes payable which are convertible at a 10% discount to the market price of our common stock and convertible into approximately 52,728,000 shares and 4,084,000 shares, respectively. At December 31, 2016, there were 10,118,259 stock options outstanding. However, these potentially dilutive shares are considered to be anti-dilutive and are therefore not included in the calculation of loss per share.

F-15

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were $4,445,479 and $4,745,479 of convertible notes payable which are convertible at a 10% discount to the market price of our common stock and convertible into approximately 35,282,000 shares and 52,728,000 shares, respectively. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were 6,443,259 and 10,118,259 stock options outstanding, respectively. However, these potentially dilutive shares are considered to be anti-dilutive and are therefore not included in the calculation of loss per share.

Note 3 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~May~~February ~~2017~~2018, the Financial Accounting ~~Standards~~ Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. ~~2017~~2018-0902, ~~Compensation~~ –Income ~~Stock~~Statement—Reporting ~~Compensation~~Comprehensive Income (Topic ~~718~~220): “~~Scope~~Reclassification of ~~Modification~~Certain ~~Accounting~~Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASU ~~2017~~2018-0902”). ~~ASU~~The ~~2017-09~~guidance ~~amends~~permits ~~the~~entities to reclassify tax effects stranded in accumulated other comprehensive ~~scope~~income as a result of ~~modification~~tax ~~accounting~~reform ~~for~~to ~~share-based~~retained ~~payment~~earnings, ~~arrangements~~giving entities the option to reclassify these amounts rather than require reclassification. The ~~guidance~~FASB ~~requires~~also ~~modification~~gave ~~accounting~~entities ~~only~~the ifoption ~~the fair~~to ~~value,~~apply ~~vesting~~the ~~conditions,~~guidance retrospectively or in the ~~classification~~period of adoption. When adopted, the ~~award~~standard ~~(as~~requires ~~equity~~all orentities ~~liability)~~to ~~changes~~make asnew adisclosures, ~~result~~regardless of awhether ~~change~~they inelect to reclassify stranded amounts. ~~terms~~Entities are required to disclose whether or ~~conditions.~~not ~~ASU~~they elected to reclassify the tax effects related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017~~-09~~ isas ~~effective~~well as their policy for ~~financial~~releasing ~~statements~~income ~~issued~~tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017~~2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Entities isare ~~currently~~able ~~evaluating~~to early adopt the ~~potential~~guidance ~~impact~~in ofany interim or annual period for which financial statements have not yet been issued and apply it either (1) in the period of adoption or (2) retrospectively to each period in which the income tax effects of ~~ASU~~the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017~~-09~~ related onto ~~the~~items in accumulated other comprehensive income are recognized. The Company's is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In ~~January~~August 2017, the FASB issued ASU ~~No.~~ 2017-0112, ~~Business~~Derivatives ~~Combinations~~and Hedging (Topic ~~805~~815): “~~Clarifying~~Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”. The guidance amends the ~~Definition~~hedge accounting model in ASC 815 to enable entities to better portray the economics of atheir ~~Business”,~~risk ~~that~~management ~~clarifies~~activities in the ~~definition~~financial statements and enhance the transparency and understandability of ahedge ~~business~~results. The amendments expand an entity’s ~~for~~ability ~~entities~~to ~~that~~hedge ~~must~~nonfinancial ~~determine~~and ~~whether~~financial arisk ~~business~~components ~~has~~and ~~been~~reduce ~~acquired~~complexity orin ~~sold~~fair value hedges of interest rate risk. ~~The~~This ASU ~~amendment~~eliminates isthe ~~intended~~requirement to ~~assist~~separately ~~entities~~measure ~~with~~and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change ~~evaluating~~in ~~whether~~the ~~transactions~~fair ~~should~~value of a hedging instrument to be ~~accounted~~presented ~~for~~in asthe ~~acquisitions~~same orincome ~~disposals~~statement ofline ~~assets~~as orthe ~~businesses~~hedged item. ~~The~~This ~~new~~ASU ~~standard~~ is effective for ~~annual~~fiscal ~~and~~years ~~interim periods~~ beginning after December 15, ~~2017~~2018, ~~with~~and ~~early~~interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in ~~under~~any ~~certain~~interim ~~circumstances~~period or fiscal year before the effective date. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, entities will apply the new guidance using a modified retrospective approach (i.e., with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the initial application date). The guidance provides transition relief to make it easier for entities to apply certain amendments to existing hedges (including fair value hedges) where the hedge documentation needs to be modified. The presentation and disclosure requirements apply prospectively. The Company is currently ~~evaluating~~assessing the impact that ~~the~~adopting ~~adoption~~this ~~of the~~ new ~~guidance~~accounting standard will have on its consolidated financial ~~condition, results~~statements ~~of operations~~ and ~~cash~~footnote ~~flows~~disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): “Restricted Cash”, that requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. ASU 2016-18 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of the new guidance will have on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): “Interests Held through Related Parties that are under Common Control”, that amends the evaluation of whether a reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) by changing how a reporting entity that is a single decision maker of a VIE treats indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity. The new standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): “Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory”, that requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. This amendment eliminates the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The new standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted in the first interim period and the amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of the new guidance will have on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”, that amends the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments, to reduce the diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of the new guidance will have on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, that requires a financial asset measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected and requires that credit losses from available-for-sale debt securities be presented as an allowance for credit losses. This new guidance will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of the new guidance will have on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

F-16

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 3 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

In ~~March 2016~~May 2017, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016~~2017-09, “Compensation – — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): ~~Improvements~~“Scope toof ~~Employee~~Modification ~~Share-Based Payment~~ Accounting”. ~~The purpose of~~ ASU ~~2016~~2017-09 isamends tothe ~~simplify~~scope ~~the~~of modification accounting for share-based payment ~~transactions,~~arrangements. ~~including the~~The ~~income~~guidance ~~tax~~requires ~~consequences,~~modification ~~classification~~accounting ofonly ~~awards~~if ~~as either equity or liabilities, and classification of such activity on~~ the ~~statement~~ offair ~~cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15~~value, ~~2016, including interim periods~~vesting ~~within that year. Prospective~~conditions, ~~retrospective,~~ or ~~modified retrospective application may be used dependent on~~ the ~~specific~~classification ~~requirements~~ of the ~~amendments~~award ~~within~~(as ~~ASU~~equity ~~2016-09.~~or Weliability) ~~will~~changes ~~adopt~~as ~~ASU~~a ~~2016-09~~result onof a ~~prospective~~change ~~basis~~in ~~during~~terms ~~the~~or ~~first interim period of 2017~~conditions. ~~Upon~~ ~~adoption of~~ ASU ~~2016~~2017-09, weis ~~will~~effective ~~revise~~for ~~our~~financial ~~future~~statements ~~diluted~~issued ~~earnings~~for ~~per~~fiscal ~~share~~years ~~calculations~~beginning toafter ~~exclude~~December ~~the~~15, ~~estimated~~2017. ~~tax~~The ~~benefits and~~Company ~~deficiencies~~is incurrently evaluating the ~~application of the treasury stock method, which will~~ impact ~~the number~~ of ~~dilutive~~this ~~shares~~standard ~~included~~but indoes ~~the diluted~~not ~~earnings~~expect ~~per share calculation. Excess tax benefits or deficiencies related~~ to ~~share~~have ~~based~~a ~~awards~~material ~~will~~impact beon ~~recognized as discrete items in~~ the ~~income~~Company’s ~~statement~~consolidated ~~during the period in which they occur. We will continue to estimate forfeitures for our~~balance ~~share~~sheet, ~~based~~results ~~awards~~of ~~after~~operations ~~adoption~~and ofcash ~~ASU 2016-09~~flows.

In January ~~2016~~2017, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016~~N2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): “~~Financial~~Clarifying ~~Instruments~~the –Definition ~~Overall~~of ~~(Subtopic~~a ~~825-10)~~Business”, ~~which~~that ~~updates~~clarifies ~~certain~~the ~~aspects~~definition of ~~recognition,~~a ~~measurement,~~business ~~presentation~~for ~~and~~entities ~~disclosure~~that must determine whether a business has been acquired or sold. The amendment is intended to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of ~~financial~~assets ~~instruments~~or businesses. The new ~~guidance~~ standard is effective for ~~public~~annual ~~companies~~and ~~for~~interim ~~fiscal~~periods ~~years~~ beginning after December 15, 2017, ~~including~~with ~~interim~~early ~~periods~~adoption ~~within~~permitted ~~those~~under ~~fiscal~~certain ~~years~~circumstances. The ~~adoption~~Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard isbut does not ~~expected~~expect to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated ~~financial~~balance ~~position~~sheet, ~~and~~ results of operations and cash flows.

In November ~~2015~~2016, hethe FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2015~~ 2016-1718, ~~Income~~ ~~Taxes~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic ~~740~~230): “~~Balance~~Restricted ~~Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes~~Cash”, ~~which~~that ~~changes~~requires ~~how~~that ~~deferred~~the ~~taxes~~statement ~~are~~of ~~classified on~~cash ~~organizations’~~flows ~~balance~~explain the ~~sheets.~~change ~~The~~during ~~ASU eliminates~~ the ~~current~~period ~~requirement~~in ~~for~~the ~~organizations~~total toof ~~present~~cash, ~~deferred~~cash ~~tax~~equivalents, ~~liabilities~~ and ~~assets~~amounts asgenerally ~~current~~described ~~and~~as ~~noncurrent~~restricted incash aor ~~classified~~restricted cash ~~balance sheet~~equivalents. ~~Instead~~Therefore, ~~organizations~~amounts ~~will~~generally bedescribed ~~required~~as torestricted ~~classify~~cash ~~all~~and ~~deferred tax~~restricted ~~assets~~cash ~~and~~equivalents ~~liabilities~~should asbe ~~noncurrent.~~included with ~~The~~cash ~~amendments~~and ~~apply~~cash toequivalents ~~all~~when ~~organizations~~reconciling ~~that~~the ~~present~~beginning-of-period aand ~~classified~~end-of-period ~~balance~~total ~~sheet.~~amounts ~~For public~~shown ~~companies,~~on the ~~amendments~~statement of ~~are~~cash ~~effective~~flows. ~~for~~The ~~financial~~amendment ~~statements~~is ~~issued~~effective for ~~annual~~fiscal ~~periods~~years beginning after December 15, ~~2016~~ 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal ~~annual~~years ~~periods~~and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. ~~The~~Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. ASU 2016-18 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard isbut ~~expected~~does not expect to have noa material impact on the Company’s consolidated ~~financial~~balance sheet, ~~position and~~ results of operations and cash flows.

In ~~August~~October ~~2015~~2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2015~~ 2016-1417, ~~Revenue~~ Consolidation ~~from Contracts with Customers~~ (Topic ~~606~~810): “~~Deferral~~Interests ofHeld ~~Effective~~through ~~Date”,~~Related ~~which~~Parties ~~defers~~that ~~the~~are ~~effective date~~under ofCommon ~~ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15~~Control”, ~~2017,~~that ~~including~~amends the ~~interim~~evaluation ~~periods~~of ~~within~~whether ~~that~~a reporting ~~period.~~entity ~~Earlier application~~ is ~~permitted~~the ~~only~~primary asbeneficiary of ~~annual~~a ~~reporting~~Variable ~~periods~~Interest ~~beginning~~Entity ~~after December~~(“VIE”) ~~15,~~by ~~2016,~~changing how ~~including~~a ~~interim~~ reporting ~~periods~~entity ~~within~~ that ~~reporting~~is ~~period.~~a ~~ASU~~single ~~2014-09~~decision ~~may~~maker beof ~~applied using either~~ a ~~full~~ ~~retrospective~~VIE ~~approach,~~treats ~~under~~indirect ~~which~~interests ~~all years included~~ in the ~~financial~~entity ~~statements~~held ~~will~~through berelated ~~presented under the revised guidance,~~parties orthat aare ~~modified retrospective approach,~~ under ~~which~~common ~~financial~~control ~~statements~~with ~~will be prepared under~~ the ~~revised~~reporting ~~guidance for the year of adoption, but not for prior years~~entity. ~~Under~~The ~~the~~new ~~latter~~standard ~~method,~~is ~~entities will recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at the~~ effective ~~date~~ for ~~contracts~~annual ~~that~~and ~~still~~interim ~~require~~periods ~~performance~~beginning after byDecember ~~the~~15, ~~entity~~2016, ~~and~~with ~~disclose all~~early ~~line~~adoption ~~items~~permitted, inincluding ~~the year of~~ adoption asin ifan ~~they~~interim ~~were prepared under the old revenue guidance~~period. WeThe ~~are~~adoption ~~currently~~of ~~evaluating~~this ~~the~~standard ~~impact~~did ~~that~~not ~~this~~have ~~adoption~~a ~~will~~material ~~have~~impact on ~~our~~the Company’s consolidated ~~financial~~balance ~~statements. At this time~~sheet, weresults ~~have~~of ~~not~~operations ~~determined~~and ~~the~~cash ~~transition method that will be used~~flows.

In ~~April~~October ~~2015~~2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2015~~2016-0316, ~~“Interest~~Income -Taxes ~~Imputation of Interest~~ (~~Subtopic~~Topic ~~835-30~~740): ~~Simplifying~~“Intra-Entity ~~the~~Transfers ~~Presentation~~ of ~~Debt~~Assets ~~Issuance~~Other ~~Costs~~Than Inventory”., ~~This~~that ~~standard amends~~requires ~~the~~an ~~existing~~entity ~~guidance~~ to ~~require~~recognize the ~~that~~income ~~debt~~tax ~~issuance~~consequences ~~costs~~of bean ~~presented~~intra-entity intransfer ~~the~~of ~~balance~~an ~~sheet~~asset asother athan ~~deduction~~inventory ~~from~~when the ~~carrying amount~~transfer ofoccurs. This amendment eliminates the ~~related~~exception ~~debt~~for ~~liability~~an ~~instead~~intra-entity transfer of asan aasset ~~deferred~~other ~~charge~~than inventory. ~~ASU~~The ~~2015-03~~new standard is effective ~~on a retrospective basis~~ for annual and interim ~~reporting~~ periods beginning after December 15, ~~2015~~2017, ~~but~~with early adoption is permitted in the first interim period and the amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company ~~adopted~~is ~~ASU~~currently ~~2015-03 in~~evaluating ~~2015~~the ~~and~~impact itthat ~~did~~the ~~not~~adoption ~~have~~of athe ~~material~~new ~~effect~~guidance will have on its consolidated financial ~~statements~~condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In ~~February~~August ~~2015~~2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2015~~2016-0215, ~~“Consolidation~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic ~~810~~230): ~~Amendments~~“Classification toof ~~the~~Certain ~~Consolidation~~Cash ~~Analysis~~Receipts and Cash Payments”, ~~which~~that ~~provides~~amends ~~guidance~~the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments, to reduce the diversity in ~~evaluating~~how ~~entities~~certain cash receipts and cash payments ~~for~~are ~~inclusion~~presented and classified in ~~consolidations~~the statement of cash flows. ~~ASU~~The ~~2015-02~~new standard is effective for ~~fiscal~~annual ~~years~~periods beginning after December 15, ~~2016.~~2017, ~~The~~and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption ofpermitted, ~~ASU~~including adoption in an interim ~~2015-02~~period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard but does not ~~expected~~expect to have a material ~~effect~~impact on ~~its~~the Company’s consolidated ~~financial~~balance ~~statements~~sheet, results of operations and cash flows.

F-17

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 3 – Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

In ~~August~~June ~~2014~~2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014~~2016-1513, ~~“Disclosure~~Financial ofInstruments ~~Uncertainties~~– ~~about~~Credit ~~and~~Losses ~~Entities~~(Topic ~~Ability~~326): to“Measurement ~~Continue~~of asCredit aLosses ~~Going~~on ~~Concern”.~~Financial ~~Under the new standard~~Instruments”, ~~management must evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate,~~ that ~~raise substantial doubt about the Company’s~~ ~~ability~~requires ~~to continue as~~ a ~~going concern within one year after the date that the~~ financial ~~statements~~asset ~~are~~measured ~~issued.~~at ~~This~~amortized ~~evaluation initially~~cost ~~does~~to ~~not~~be ~~take~~presented ~~into~~at ~~consideration~~ the ~~potential~~net ~~mitigating~~amount ~~effect~~expected of management’s plans that have not been fully implemented as of the date the financial statements are issued. When substantial doubt exists under this methodology, management evaluates whether the mitigating effect of its plans sufficiently alleviates substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to ~~continue as a going concern. The mitigating effect of management’s plans, however, is only considered if both (1) it is probable that the plans will~~ be ~~effectively~~collected ~~implemented within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued,~~ and ~~(2)~~requires ~~it is probable~~ that ~~the plans, when implemented, will mitigate the relevant conditions or events that raise substantial~~ ~~doubt~~credit ~~about~~losses ~~the~~from ~~entity’s~~available-for-sale ~~ability~~debt tosecurities ~~continue~~be presented as aan ~~going~~allowance ~~concern~~for ~~within~~credit ~~one~~losses. ~~year~~This ~~after~~new ~~the~~guidance ~~date~~will ~~that the financial statements~~be ~~are issued. The amendments are~~ effective for annual ~~periods ending after December 31, 2016,~~ and interim periods ~~within annual periods~~ beginning after December 15, ~~2016.~~2019, ~~Early~~with ~~application~~early isadoption permitted for annual orand interim ~~reporting~~ periods ~~for~~beginning ~~which~~after ~~the~~December ~~financial statements~~15, ~~have not previously been issued~~2018. The Company ~~has~~is ~~adopted~~currently ~~ASU~~evaluating ~~2014-15~~the ~~from~~impact ~~its~~that ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~adoption ~~ended~~of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~new ~~2015 and~~guidance ~~the~~will ~~adoption~~have ~~did~~on ~~not~~its ~~have~~consolidated abalance ~~material~~sheet, ~~effect~~results onof ~~its~~operations ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~cash ~~statements~~flows.

In March ~~May 2014~~2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014~~2016-09, Compensation ~~that establishes~~— ~~the~~Stock ~~principles~~Compensation ~~used~~(Topic to718): ~~recognize~~“Improvements ~~revenue~~to ~~for~~Employee Share-Based ~~all~~Payment ~~entities~~Accounting”. InThe ~~March~~purpose ~~2016,~~of ~~the FASB issued~~ ASU 2016-0809 ~~that~~is ~~further clarifies~~to simplify the ~~implementation~~accounting ~~guidance~~for onshare-based ~~principal~~payment ~~versus agent considerations. In April 2016~~transactions, including the ~~FASB~~income ~~issued~~tax ~~ASU~~consequences, ~~2016-10~~classification ~~that clarifies~~of ~~guidance~~awards onas ~~identifying~~either ~~performance~~equity ~~obligations~~or ~~and~~liabilities, ~~to improve the operability~~ and ~~understandability~~classification of ~~licensing~~such ~~implementation~~activity ~~guidance.~~on Inthe ~~May~~statement ~~2016,~~of ~~the~~cash ~~FASB~~flows. ~~issued~~ ASU 2016-1109 ~~that~~is ~~rescinds~~effective ~~SEC~~for ~~guidance~~fiscal ~~pursuant~~years tobeginning ~~announcements~~after ~~at the March 3~~December 15, 2016, ~~Emerging~~including interim ~~Issues~~periods ~~Task~~within ~~Force~~that ~~Meeting~~year. InProspective, ~~May 2016~~retrospective, ~~the~~or ~~FASB~~modified ~~issued~~retrospective ~~ASU~~application ~~2016-12~~may ~~that~~be ~~provides~~used ~~narrow-scope~~dependent ~~improvements~~on ~~and~~the specific ~~practical~~requirements ~~expedients to Revenue~~of ~~from~~the ~~Contracts~~amendments ~~with~~within ~~Customers~~ASU 2016-09. InEffective ~~December~~January ~~2016~~1, 2017, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ASU 2016-2009. ~~that~~Excess income ~~includes~~tax ~~technical~~benefits ~~corrections and~~or ~~improvements~~deficiencies related to ~~ASU~~share ~~2014-09.~~based ~~The~~awards ~~new~~are ~~guidance~~now ~~will~~recognized beas ~~effective~~discrete ~~for~~items ~~annual~~in ~~and~~the ~~interim~~income ~~periods~~statement during ~~beginning~~the ~~after~~period ~~December~~in ~~15, 2017.~~which ~~Early~~they ~~application~~occur. ~~will~~This bechange ~~permitted,~~has ~~but~~been ~~not~~applied ~~before~~on ~~annual~~a ~~reporting~~prospective ~~periods~~basis. ~~beginning~~As ~~after~~such, ~~December~~prior ~~15,~~periods ~~2016.~~have ~~The~~not ~~Company~~been ~~has~~adjusted. ~~evaluated~~Furthermore, the ~~impact~~Company ofhas ~~the~~elected ~~adoption~~to ofcontinue ~~this~~to ~~guidance~~estimate ~~and~~forfeitures asfor ashare-based ~~result~~awards. The adoption of this standard ~~evaluation~~did ~~does~~ not ~~expect it will~~ have a material impact on ~~its~~the ~~financial~~Company’s ~~condition~~consolidated balance sheet, results of operations and cash flows.

~~Note~~In 4January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – ~~Notes~~Overall ~~Receivable~~(Subtopic 825-10)”, which updates certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The new guidance is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard but does not expect to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations and cash flows.

OnIn ~~June~~November 172015, ~~2014,~~the ~~ROI~~FASB ~~DEV~~issued ~~entered~~ASU No. ~~into~~2015-17, aIncome ~~Framework Agreement~~Taxes ~~with~~(Topic ~~Coast~~740): to“Balance ~~Coast~~Sheet ~~Holdings,~~Classification ~~Inc.~~of ~~(“CTC~~Deferred Taxes”), awhich ~~Canadian~~changes ~~Construction~~how ~~corporation.~~deferred taxes ~~Under~~are ~~the~~classified ~~terms~~on oforganizations’ ~~the~~balance ~~agreement, ROI~~sheets. ~~DEV~~The ~~will~~ASU ~~provide~~eliminates ~~funding~~the current requirement for organizations to ~~CTC~~present deferred intax ~~the~~liabilities ~~form~~and ofassets ~~notes~~as ~~payable~~current and ~~mortgage~~noncurrent ~~notes~~in ~~payable~~a ~~for~~classified ~~property~~balance ~~development~~sheet. ~~projects~~Instead, organizations will be required ~~and~~to ~~provide~~classify ~~financial~~all ~~and~~deferred ~~real~~tax ~~estate~~assets ~~advisory~~and ~~services,~~liabilities ~~for~~as anoncurrent. ~~period~~The ofamendments upapply to ~~ten~~all ~~years.~~organizations ~~ROI~~that ~~DEV~~present ~~has~~a ~~the~~classified balance ~~right~~sheet. toFor ~~make~~public companies, the ~~loan or~~amendments ~~not~~are ~~and~~effective ~~each~~for ~~individual~~financial ~~loan~~statements ~~will~~issued befor ~~evidenced~~annual byperiods ~~its~~beginning after ~~own~~December ~~promissory~~15, ~~note~~2016, ~~with~~and ~~terms~~interim ~~agreed~~periods ~~upon~~within bythose ~~the~~annual ~~parties~~periods. The ~~Framework~~adoption of this standard did not have a material ~~Agreement~~impact ~~was~~on ~~terminated~~the asCompany’s ofconsolidated ~~December~~balance 31sheet, ~~2014~~results of operations and cash flows.

~~Mortgage~~In ~~notes~~August ~~receivable~~2015, ~~and~~the ~~notes~~FASB ~~receivable~~issued ASU ~~due~~2015-14, Revenue from ~~CTC~~Contracts ~~consisted~~with Customers (Topic 606): “Deferral of Effective Date”, which defers the ~~following~~effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09 is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 3115, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. ASU 2014-09 may be applied using either a full retrospective approach, under which all years included in the financial statements will be presented under the revised guidance, or a modified retrospective approach, under which financial statements will be prepared under the revised guidance for the year of adoption, but not for prior years. Under the latter method, entities will recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings at the effective date for contracts that still require performance by the entity, and ~~2015:~~disclose all line items in the year of adoption as if they were prepared under the old revenue guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard but does not expect to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, results of operations and cash flows.

	December 31, 2016							December 31, 2015
Notes	Note Face Value		Reserve for Loan Loss			Note, net		Note Face Value		Reserve for Loan Loss			Note, net
Mortgage Notes:
3320 Kenney St., BC	$	443,354	$	(443,354	)	$	–	$	443,354	$	–		$	443,354
Unsecured Notes:
1015-1050 Nalabila Blvd, BC	$	1,012,237	$	(1,012,237	)	$	–	$	1,012,237	$	(1,012,237	)	$	–
3320 Kenney St., BC		630,788		(630,788	)		–		630,788		(630,788	)		–
	$	1,643,025	$	(1,643,025	)	$	–	$	1,643,025	$	(1,643,025	)	$	–

F-18

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 43 – ~~Notes~~Recently ~~Receivable~~Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

~~Mortgage~~In ~~Notes~~February ~~Receivable~~2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis”, which provides guidance in evaluating entities for inclusion in consolidations. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted ASU 2015-02 and concluded that its financial interest in ROI SCA continues to qualify as a consolidated VIE.

OnIn ~~December~~May 312014, ~~2015,~~ the ~~Company~~FASB ~~had~~issued aASU ~~mortgage~~2014-09 ~~note~~that ~~receivable~~establishes ~~outstanding~~the ~~with~~principles ~~CTC~~used ~~for~~to ~~$154,994~~recognize ~~(CAD~~revenue ~~215,000).~~for ~~The~~all ~~note~~entities. ~~bears~~In ~~interest~~March at2016, 8%the ~~per~~FASB ~~annum~~issued ~~and~~ASU ~~was~~2016-08 ~~due~~that onfurther clarifies the ~~earlier of~~implementation ~~(i)~~guidance ~~December~~on ~~30,~~principal ~~2015~~versus oragent ~~(ii)~~considerations. ~~the~~In ~~date~~April ~~upon~~2016, ~~which~~ the ~~subject~~FASB ~~property~~issued isASU ~~sold~~2016-10 bythat clarifies ~~CTC.~~guidance ~~The~~on ~~mortgage~~identifying ~~note~~performance isobligations inand ~~default~~to atimprove ~~December 31,~~the ~~2015;~~operability ~~however,~~and itunderstandability isof ~~collateralized~~licensing byimplementation guidance. aIn ~~mortgage~~May on2016, the ~~property.~~FASB Asissued ofASU ~~December~~2016-11 ~~31,~~that ~~2016~~rescinds ~~and~~SEC ~~2015,~~guidance ~~$-0-~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~$18~~announcements at the March 3,~~759~~ of2016 ~~interest~~Emerging ~~receivable~~Issues ~~was~~Task ~~accrued~~Force onMeeting. ~~the~~In ~~loan.~~May ~~During~~2016, the ~~year~~FASB ~~ended~~issued ~~December 31,~~ASU 2016,-12 ~~CTC~~that ~~defaulted~~provides onnarrow-scope ~~the~~improvements ~~mortgage note~~ and ~~therefore~~practical expedients ~~the~~to Revenue ~~note~~from ~~receivable~~Contracts ~~was~~with ~~impaired~~Customers. ~~Management~~In ~~believes~~December ~~that~~2016, the ~~recoverability~~FASB ofissued ~~this~~ASU ~~amount~~2016-20 isthat ~~less~~includes ~~than~~technical ~~probable. The Company~~corrections ~~initiated~~and ~~the~~improvements ~~process~~ to ~~activate~~ASU ~~the~~2014-09. ~~mortgage~~The ~~and~~new ~~seize~~guidance ~~the~~will ~~underlying~~be ~~land.~~effective ~~While~~for ~~the~~annual ~~Company~~and ~~believes~~interim ~~that~~periods itbeginning ~~will~~after ~~successfully~~December 15, ~~hold~~2017. ~~ownership~~Early ofapplication ~~the~~will ~~subject~~be ~~property~~permitted, ~~there~~but isnot nobefore ~~probable~~annual ~~assurance~~reporting ~~regarding~~periods ~~the~~beginning ~~timing~~after ofDecember ~~such~~15, ~~outcome~~2016. ~~Therefore,~~The Company is currently evaluating the ~~subject property~~impact ~~has~~of ~~not~~this ~~been~~standard ~~recorded~~but asdoes ~~real~~not ~~estate~~expect ~~under~~to ~~development~~have ~~and~~a ~~sale~~material inimpact on the ~~accompanying~~Company’s consolidated balance sheet, asresults of ~~December 31,~~operations ~~2016~~and cash flows.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company assumed a second mortgage note due to a related party by CTC and CTC agreed to reimburse the Company for the full amount of the mortgage and accrued interest due thereon. The loan bears interest at 6% per annum and is due April 13, 2016. The amount of the mortgage loan due from CTC at December 31, 2015 was $288,360 (CAD 400,000) and $16,718 of interest receivable was accrued on the loan. During the year ended December 31, 2016, CTC defaulted on the mortgage note and therefore the note receivable was impaired. Management believes that the recoverability of this amount is less than probable. The Company initiated the process to activate the mortgage and seize the underlying land. While the Company believes that it will successfully hold ownership of the subject property, there is no probable assurance regarding the timing of such outcome. Therefore, the subject property has not been recorded as real estate under development and sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.

Unsecured Notes Receivable

On December 31, 2015, the Company had an unsecured note receivable outstanding with CTC for $630,788 (CAD 875,000). The note bears interest at 8%, was due December 30, 2015 but was in default as of December 31, 2015. The funding from the note was used for the development and construction on the property for which the Company has two mortgage notes receivable. As CTC has not responded to requests for payment on the notes and has not provided any evidence of the use of funds, the Company has fully reserved against this note for loan loss, as well as $52,986 (CAD 73,500) of accrued interest, as of December 31, 2015. The Company is vigorously pursuing the collection of the note but has not been successful as of December 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid CTC $1,012,237 (CAD 1,404,130) in the form of unsecured notes for the development of one of its properties. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum and were due December 30, 2015. The notes are in default at December 31, 2015. As CTC has not responded to requests for payment on the notes and has not provided any evidence of the use of funds, the Company has fully reserved against these notes for loan loss, as well as $56,162 (CAD 67,314) of accrued interest, as of December 31, 2015. The Company is vigorously pursuing the collection of the note but has not been successful as of December 31, 2016.

F-19

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 54 – ~~Real~~Notes ~~Estate~~and ~~Held~~Loans ~~For Development And Sale~~Receivable

~~Real~~On ~~estate~~June ~~held~~17, 2014, ROI DEV entered into a Framework Agreement with Coast to Coast Holdings Ltd. (“CTC”), a Canadian Construction corporation. Under the terms of the agreement, ROI DEV will provide funding to CTC in the form of notes payable and mortgage notes payable for property development projects, and ~~sale~~provide ~~consist~~ financial and real estate advisory services, for a period of up to ten years. ROI DEV has the ~~following~~right ~~projects~~to make the loan or not and each individual loan will be evidenced by its own promissory note with terms agreed upon by the parties. The Framework Agreement was terminated as of December 31, ~~2016 and 2015:~~2014.

	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2015
Property / Project	USD		CAD		USD		CAD
Beauport, BC	$	4,724,686	$	6,362,780	$	4,567,218	$	6,335,438
840 Graham Avenue, Terrace, BC		256,286		345,142		233,275		323,589
3304 Kenney Street, Terrace, BC		754,596		1,016,223		727,711		1,009,448
4922 Park Avenue, Terrace, BC		591,993		797,243		570,808		791,799
1015-1050 Nalabila Blvd, Kitimat, BC		1,673,366		2,253,540		1,529,141		2,121,155
Evans, Colorado		7,747,820		–		7,169,847		–
	$	15,748,747			$	14,798,000

Mortgage notes receivable and notes receivable due from CTC consisted of the following as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Beauport, QC

	December 31, 2017									December 31, 2016
Notes	Note Face Value		Reserve for Loan Loss			Note, net		Note Face Value		Reserve for Loan Loss			Note, net

Mortgage Notes:

3320 Kenney St., BC	$	443,354	$	(443,354	)	$	–	$	443,354	$	(443,354	)	$	–

Unsecured Notes:

1015-1050 Nalabila Blvd, BC	$	1,012,237	$	(1,012,237	)	$	–	$	1,012,237	$	(1,012,237	)	$	–

3320 Kenney St., BC		630,788		(630,788	)		–		630,788		(630,788	)		–

	$	1,643,025	$	(1,643,025	)	$	–	$	1,643,025	$	(1,643,025	)	$	–

OnMortgage ~~March~~Notes 24, 2014, the Company’s wholly-owned Subsidiaries, ROI DEV, executed a Definitive Agreement for the purchase of land from 9284-0784 Québec Inc. The land consists of 1,971,000 square feet in suburban Quebec and is known as the “Beauport Project”. Per the terms of the Agreement, the total cost of the purchase was $5,085,210 (CAD 5,913,723), of which $257,970 (CAD 300,000) was tendered upon execution as a firm initial deposit, with the remaining balance of $4,827,240 (CAD 5,613,723) was to be paid on or before June 1, 2014. As the balances were not paid by June 1, 2014, the Company and 9284-0784 Quebec Inc. agreed to extend the due date and the Company paid additional deposits totaling $730,915 (CAD 850,000) and fees to extend the payment date of the transaction of $201,827 (CAD 234,709), which have been capitalized as part of the cost of the project. The Company’s President, Sebastien Cliche, owns 16.67% of 9284-0784 Quebec Inc.Receivable

OnDuring ~~October~~fiscal ~~14,~~year ~~2014~~2015, ~~ROI~~the ~~DEV~~Company ~~closed on the~~had ~~purchase~~a ofmortgage ~~the~~note ~~land.~~receivable ~~The~~outstanding ~~total~~with ~~cost~~CTC offor ~~the purchase was~~ $5154,~~287,037~~994 (CAD 6215,~~148,432~~000). ~~From~~The ~~October~~note ~~14,~~bears ~~2014~~interest ~~through~~at ~~December~~8% ~~31, 2014,~~per ~~the~~annum ~~Company~~and ~~has~~was ~~incurred~~due on anthe ~~additional~~earlier ~~$144,411~~of (~~CAD~~i) ~~167~~December 30,~~940)~~ of2015 ~~project~~or ~~development~~(ii) ~~costs~~the ~~and~~date ~~has~~upon ~~been~~which ~~capitalized~~the assubject ~~a part~~property ofis ~~the~~sold ~~project~~by ~~resulting~~CTC. inThe amortgage ~~balance~~note was in ~~the~~default ~~project~~at ofDecember $531,~~431,448~~ ~~(CAD~~2015; 6however,~~316,372)~~ atit ~~December~~was ~~31,~~collateralized ~~2014.~~by ~~During~~a mortgage on the ~~year~~property. ~~ended~~ As of December 31, ~~2015,~~2017 ~~$13~~and 2016,~~745~~ $-0- ~~(CAD~~of ~~19,066)~~interest receivable was ~~incurred~~accrued ~~and~~on ~~capitalized~~the toloan. During fiscal year 2016, CTC defaulted on the ~~project~~mortgage ~~resulting~~note inand atherefore the ~~balance~~note inreceivable was impaired. Management believes that the ~~project~~recoverability of ~~$4,567,218 (CAD~~this ~~6,335,438)~~amount atis ~~December~~less ~~31,~~than ~~2015~~probable. ~~During~~The Company initiated the ~~year~~process ~~ended~~to ~~December 31,~~activate ~~2016,~~the mortgage and seize the underlying land. While the Company ~~incurred~~believes ~~and~~that ~~capitalized~~it towill ~~the~~successfully ~~project~~hold ~~$20,643~~ownership ~~(CAD~~of 27the subject property,~~342)~~ ~~resulting~~there inis ano ~~balance~~probable inassurance regarding the ~~project~~timing of ~~$4,724,686~~such ~~(CAD~~outcome. 6Therefore,~~362,780)~~ atthe subject property has not been recorded as real estate under development and sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

~~840~~During ~~Graham~~fiscal ~~Avenue~~year 2015, ~~Terrace~~the Company assumed a second mortgage note due to a related party by CTC and CTC agreed to reimburse the Company for the full amount of the mortgage and accrued interest due thereon. The loan bears interest at 6% per annum and was due April 13, BC2016. The amount of the mortgage loan due from CTC at December 31, 2015 was $288,360 (CAD 400,000) and $16,718 of interest receivable was accrued on the loan. During fiscal year 2016, CTC defaulted on the mortgage note and therefore the note receivable was impaired. Management believes that the recoverability of this amount is less than probable. The Company initiated the process to activate the mortgage and seize the underlying land. While the Company believes that it will successfully hold ownership of the subject property, there is no probable assurance regarding the timing of such outcome. Therefore, the subject property has not been recorded as real estate under development and sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

On June 14, 2014, ROI DEV agreed to fund CTC a total of $266,569 (CAD 310,000) for a property development project known as 840 Graham Street, Terrace, BC under the Framework Agreement between the parties. On December 31, 2014, the Company and CTC entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement whereby the Company has received the title interest in the property acquired by CTC and had relieved CTC from any further obligation of the mortgage note receivable and the Framework Agreement was terminated. During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, $16,273 (CAD 21,553) and $9,796 (CAD 13,589), respectively, were incurred and capitalized to the project resulting in balances in the project of $256,286 (CAD 345,142) at December 31, 2016 and $233,275 (CAD 323,589) at December 31, 2015.

F-20

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 4 – Notes Receivable (Continued)

Unsecured Notes Receivable

On December 31, 2015, the Company had an unsecured note receivable outstanding with CTC for $630,788 (CAD 875,000). The note bears interest at 8%, was due on December 30, 2015 but was in default as of December 31, 2015. The funding from the note was used for the development and construction on the property for which the Company has two mortgage notes receivable. As CTC has not responded to requests for payment on the notes and has not provided any evidence of the use of funds, the Company fully reserved against this note for loan loss, as well as $52,986 (CAD 73,500) of accrued interest, as of December 31, 2015. The Company is vigorously pursuing the collection of the note but has not been successful as of December 31, 2017.

During fiscal year 2015, the Company paid CTC $1,012,237 (CAD 1,404,130) in the form of unsecured notes for the development of one of its properties. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum and were due December 30, 2015. The notes were in default at December 31, 2015. As CTC has not responded to requests for payment on the notes and has not provided any evidence of the use of funds, the Company has fully reserved against these notes for loan loss, as well as $56,162 (CAD 67,314) of accrued interest, as of December 31, 2016. The Company is vigorously pursuing the collection of the note but has not been successful as of December 31, 2017.

Loans Receivable from FL2

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company provided loans totaling $4,911,779 to FL2, an entity formed in fiscal year 2017 to own and develop the Swarovski Towers property in Dubai, in which the Company owns a 25% as of April 15, 2018 (Refer to Note 13). The loans provide security interest in the Dubai Swarovski Towers property owned or to be owned by FL2, bears 8% of annual interest and mature five business days prior to the maturity date of the ROI SEC Notes – Dubai (UAE) (Refer to Note 7). The loans were funded by the proceeds from the Company’s ROI SEC Notes – Dubai which mature in three years after the first deployment of the loan proceeds. The Company recorded $43,333 of interest receivable during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Note 5 – Real Estate Held for Development and Sale

Real estate held for development and sale consist of the following projects as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	December 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
Property / Project	USD		CAD		USD		CAD

Beauport, QC	$	4,071,993	$	5,111,780	$	4,724,686	$	6,362,780

840 Graham Avenue, Terrace, BC		274,937		345,142		256,286		345,142

3304 Kenney Street, Terrace, BC		809,513		1,016,223		754,596		1,016,223

4922 Park Avenue, Terrace, BC		635,076		797,243		591,993		797,243

1015-1050 Nalabila Blvd, Kitimat, BC		1,795,147		2,253,540		1,673,366		2,253,540

Evans, Colorado		9,235,884		–		7,747,820		–

	$	16,822,550			$	15,748,747

F-21

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 5 – Real Estate Held For Development And Sale (Continued)

Beauport, QC

On March 24, 2014, the Company’s wholly-owned Subsidiary, ROI DEV, executed a Definitive Agreement for the purchase of land from 9284-0784 Québec Inc. The land consists of 1,971,000 square feet in suburban Quebec and is known as the “Beauport Project”. Per the terms of the Agreement, the total cost of the purchase was $5,085,210 (CAD 5,913,723), of which $257,970 (CAD 300,000) was tendered upon execution as a firm initial deposit, with the remaining balance of $4,827,240 (CAD 5,613,723) was to be paid on or before June 1, 2014. As the balances were not paid by June 1, 2014, the Company and 9284-0784 Quebec Inc. agreed to extend the due date and the Company paid additional deposits totaling $730,915 (CAD 850,000) and fees to extend the payment date of the transaction of $201,827 (CAD 234,709), which have been capitalized as part of the cost of the project. Sebastien Cliché, the Company’s President (through October 3, 2017), owns 16.67% of 9284-0784 Quebec Inc.

On October 14, 2014, ROI DEV closed on the purchase of the land. The total cost of the purchase was $5,287,037 (CAD 6,148,432) and an additional $158,156 (CAD 187,006) and $20,643 (CAD 27,342) of project development costs were incurred and capitalized as a part of the project during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, resulting in a balance in the project of $4,724,686 (CAD 6,362,780) at December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2017, due to its continued difficulties with completing the zoning conversion the Company determined that it would not be able to develop the acquired land in the foreseeable future. The Company will continue its discussions with the appropriate authorities to expedite the timing of zoning conversion, however at the same time has started discussions with potential partners and buyers to take over some or all of its interest in the project. Based on the revised forecast for the project, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $972,097 (CAD 1,252,000), resulting in a balance in the project of $4,071,993 (CAD 5,111,780) at December 31, 2017.

840 Graham Avenue, Terrace, BC

On June 14, 2014, ROI DEV agreed to fund CTC a total of $266,569 (CAD 310,000) for a property development project known as 840 Graham Street, Terrace, BC under the Framework Agreement between the parties. On December 31, 2014, the Company and CTC entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement whereby the Company has received the title interest in the property acquired by CTC and had relieved CTC from any further obligation of the mortgage note receivable and the Framework Agreement was terminated. During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, $-0- (CAD -0-) and $16,273 (CAD 21,553), respectively, were incurred and capitalized to the project resulting in a balance in the project of $274,937 (CAD 345,142) at December 31, 2017.

3340 Kenney Street, Terrace, BC

On August 15, 2014, ROI DEV agreed to fund CTC a total of $842,541 (CAD 979,812) for a property development project known as 3304 Kenney Street, Terrace, BC under the Framework Agreement between the parties. On December 31, 2014, the Company and CTC entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement whereby the Company has received the title interest in the property acquired by CTC and had relieved CTC from any further obligation of the mortgage note receivable and the Framework Agreement was terminated. During the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016 $~~5,115~~-0- (CAD ~~6,775~~-0-) and $215,~~365~~115 (CAD 296,~~636~~775), respectively, were incurred and capitalized to the project resulting in ~~balances~~a balance in the project of of $~~754~~809,~~596~~513 (CAD 1,016,223) at December 31, ~~2016 and $727,711 (CAD 1,009,448) at December 31, 2015~~2017.

4922 Park Avenue, Terrace, BC

On September 15, 2014, ROI DEV agreed to ~~fund~~ fund CTC a total of $665,266 (CAD 773,655) for a property development project known as 4922 Park Avenue, Terrace, BC under the ~~Framework~~ Framework Agreement between the parties. On December 31, 2014, the Company and CTC entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement whereby ~~the~~ the Company has received the title interest in the property acquired by CTC and had relieved CTC from any further obligation of ~~the~~ the mortgage note receivable and the Framework Agreement was terminated. During the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, $~~4,110~~-0- (CAD ~~5,444~~-0-) and $134,~~080~~110 (CAD 185,~~144~~444), ~~was~~respectively, were incurred and capitalized to the project resulting in ~~balances~~a balance in the project of $~~591~~635,~~993~~ 076 (CAD 797,243) at December 31, ~~2016 and $570,808 (CAD 791,799) at December 31, 2015~~2017.

~~1015~~F-~~1050 Nalabila Blvd, Kitimat, BC~~22

During the year ended December 31, 2015, ROI DEV agreed to fund CTC a total of $596,274 (CAD 693,423) on a property development project known as 1015- 1050 Nalabila Blvd, Kitimat, BC under the Framework Agreement between the parties. On December 31, 2014, the Company and CTC entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement whereby the Company has received the title interest in the property acquired by CTC and had relieved CTC from any further obligation of the note receivable and the Framework Agreement was terminated. Additionally, the Company has agreed to assume the additional purchase liability for the property of $1,160,865 (CAD 1,350,000), for a total project cost of $1,757,139 (CAD 2,043,423) at December 31, 2014. The purchase liability was paid on April 22, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, $99,951 (CAD 132,385) and $56,037 (CAD 77,732), respectively, were incurred and capitalized to the project resulting in balances in the project of $1,673,366 (CAD 2,253,540) at December 31, 2016 and $1,529,141 (CAD 2,121,155) at December 31, 2015.

On May 13, 2015, the Company and LNG Canada Development Inc. (“LNG Canada”) have entered into an agreement for the Company to develop apartment and townhouse units in Kitimat, British Columbia, for which LNG was contracted to lease these units. The agreement required the Company to construct housing for LNG Canada’s workforce in multiple phases for a five-year period. In the first phase of the housing project, the Company was expected to complete the construction of 35 apartments and 9 townhouses in Kitimat, BC, by December 31, 2016. As the Company failed to meet its construction timeline due to financing constraints, the agreement was cancelled by mutual agreement on December 15, 2016.

Evans, Colorado

On June 9, 2015, the Company closed on the purchase of 220 acres of land in Evans, Colorado for a purchase price of $6,700,000. During the period from June 9, 2015 to December 31, 2015, the Company incurred $17,876 of closing costs and $451,971 of development costs on the property, resulting in a balance of $7,169,847 at December 31, 2015. On September 3, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire an additional approximately 16 acres of land in Evans, Colorado for $2,250,000, subject to due diligence and final acceptance within 21 days from the date of the agreement by the Company and to be closed within 75 days from the date of the agreement. The seller and the Company entered into an extension of the agreement until November 30, 2015 and the Company paid to the seller a deposit of $233,869. At November 30, 2015, the Company’s management decided to not pursue the land acquisition and wrote off $233,869 as abandoned project costs. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred project development costs, including interests, of $577,973 resulting in balances in the project of $7,747,820 at December 31, 2016.

F-21

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 5 – Real Estate Held For Development And Sale (Continued)

1015-1050 Nalabila Blvd, Kitimat, BC

During fiscal year 2014, ROI DEV agreed to fund CTC a total of $596,274 (CAD 693,423) on a property development project known as 1015-1050 Nalabila Blvd, Kitimat, BC under the Framework Agreement between the parties. On December 31, 2014, the Company and CTC entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement whereby the Company has received the title interest in the property acquired by CTC and had relieved CTC from any further obligation of the note receivable and the Framework Agreement was terminated. Additionally, the Company agreed to assume the additional purchase liability for the property of $1,160,865 (CAD 1,350,000), for a total project cost of $1,757,139 (CAD 2,043,423) at December 31, 2014. The purchase liability was paid on April 22, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, $-0- (CAD -0-) and $99,951 (CAD 132,385), respectively, were incurred and capitalized to the project resulting in a balance in the project of $1,795,147 (CAD 2,253,540) at December 31, 2017.

On May 13, 2015, the Company and LNG Canada Development Inc. (“LNG Canada”) entered into an agreement for the Company to develop apartment and townhouse units in Kitimat, British Columbia, for which LNG was contracted to lease these units. The agreement required the Company to construct housing for LNG Canada’s workforce in multiple phases for a five-year period. In the first phase of the housing project, the Company was expected to complete the construction of 35 apartments and 9 townhouses in Kitimat, BC, by December 31, 2016. As the Company failed to meet its construction timeline due to financing constraints, the agreement was cancelled by mutual agreement on December 15, 2016.

No significant development of these properties occurred during the year ended December 31, 2017, however, at the end of year 2017, new discussions about restarting the largest LNG project by the end of 2018 have risen and should the project be reactivated, thousands of domestic jobs could be created, combined with a boom in residential construction in this region.

Evans, Colorado

On June 9, 2015, the Company closed on the purchase of 220 acres of land in Evans, Colorado for a purchase price of $6,700,000. During the period from June 9, 2015 to December 31, 2015, the Company incurred $17,876 of closing costs and $451,971 of development costs on the property, resulting in a balance of $7,169,847 at December 31, 2015. On September 3, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire an additional approximately 16 acres of land in Evans, Colorado for $2,250,000, subject to due diligence and final acceptance within 21 days from the date of the agreement by the Company and to be closed within 75 days from the date of the agreement. The seller and the Company entered into an extension of the agreement until November 30, 2015 and the Company paid to the seller a deposit of $233,869. At November 30, 2015, the Company’s management decided to not pursue the land acquisition and wrote off $233,869 as abandoned project costs. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred project development costs, including interests, of $1,488,064 and $577,973, respectively, resulting in a balance in the project of $9,235,884 at December 31, 2017.

Sobha Hartland, Dubai

On July 9, 2015, the Company, through its subsidiary ROI FZ, entered into a memorandum of understanding with PNC Investments LLC, a UAE corporation, for the potential purchase of 433,000 square feet of land in the Sobha Hartland district of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The total acquisition price is $29,488,000 (AED 108,281,250). During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company paid a total of $2,801,205 (AED 10,286,305) in non-refundable deposits to PNC Investments LLC and incurred evaluation and design costs of $346,827 (AED 1,273,583) for a total balance of $3,148,032 at December 31, 2015.

On February 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Development Sale and Purchase Agreement with PNC. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made an additional payment of $1,900,000 (AED 6,980,144) in nonF-refundable deposits to PNC leaving a balance of $24,786,795 (AED 91,014,801). On May 15, 2016, the Company received a termination letter from PNC terminating the agreement dated February 7, 2016 for non-payment of the amounts due under the agreement. As a result, the Company forfeited the $4,701,205 (AED 17,271,099) of deposits. A total of $5,048,032 (AED 18,545,258), including $346,827 (AED 1,273,583) of closing and development costs, has been charged to operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 as abandoned project costs. However, the Company is still in negotiations with PNC to acquire a reduced size and price of the land it had agreed to under the agreement dated February 7, 2016 and apply the deposits to this restructured arrangement. Negotiations are under way, but the likelihood that the Company will be successful in reaching a satisfactory agreement is dependent on its ability to pay at least a portion of the new acquisition price. As a result, there can be no assurance that the acquisition will occur as contemplated or at all. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company also incurred $273,048 of other costs related to the project and wrote-off leasehold improvements related to a lease in Dubai for an amount of $299,475.23

Other

On May 21, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire approximately 250 acres of land in Montgomery, Texas for $8,300,000, subject to due diligence and final acceptance within 120 days from the date of the agreement by the Company. A deposit of $84,000 was paid on May 21, 2015 and the Company incurred additional costs of $33,314 during the year ended December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the Company’s management decided to not pursue the land acquisition and wrote off $117,314 abandoned land acquisition costs.

Note 6 – Investment in Cost-Method Investee

On August 1, 2014, the Company acquired a 2% interest in Society Louisette Memories SARL for $60,750 (EUR 50,000). Society Louisette Memories SARL owns a land development project in Louisette (Paca), France. The land consists of 226,000 square feet to be sub-divided into 30 residential properties. The Company is a co-investor with Rome Finance Group and Capital Evolution Group SAS. The balance of the investment at December 31, 2016 and 2015 is $56,080 (EUR 50,000), respectively.

F-22

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 5 – Real Estate Held For Development And Sale (Continued)

On February 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Development Sale and Purchase Agreement with PNC. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made an additional payment of $1,900,000 (AED 6,980,144) in non-refundable deposits to PNC leaving a balance of $24,786,795 (AED 91,014,801). On May 15, 2016, the Company received a termination letter from PNC terminating the agreement dated February 7, 2016 for non-payment of the amounts due under the agreement. As a result, the Company forfeited the $4,701,205 (AED 17,271,099) of deposits. A total of $5,048,032 (AED 18,545,258), including $346,827 (AED 1,273,583) of closing and development costs, has been charged to operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 as abandoned project costs. However, the Company is still in negotiations with PNC to acquire a reduced size and price of the land it had agreed to under the agreement dated February 7, 2016 and apply the deposits to this restructured arrangement. Negotiations are under way, but the likelihood that the Company will be successful in reaching a satisfactory agreement is dependent on its ability to pay at least a portion of the new acquisition price. As a result, there can be no assurance that the acquisition will occur as contemplated or at all. During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company also incurred $-0- and $273,048, respectively, of other costs related to the project and wrote-off leasehold improvements related to a lease in Dubai for an amount of $-0- and $299,475, respectively.

Swarovski Towers, Dubai (UAE)

On December 22, 2017, the Company entered into a Design & Licensing Agreement with Swarovski which provides the Company with an exclusive license to design and to develop the Swarovski Towers building in the Dubai (United Arab Emirates) territory. On January 18, 2018, the Company, through FL2, made its first license fee payment to Swarovski in the amount of $525,000 which was recorded as an intangible asset in the consolidated balance as of December 31, 2017.

Note 6 – Investment in Cost-Method Investee

On August 1, 2014, the Company acquired a 2% interest in Society Louisette Memories SARL. Society Louisette Memories SARL owns a land development project in Louisette (Paca), France. The land consists of 226,000 square feet to be sub-divided into 30 residential properties. The Company is a co-investor with Rome Finance Group and Capital Evolution Group SAS. The balance of the investment at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is $56,080 (EUR 50,000), respectively.

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable

Beauport Convertible Notes Payable

~~Convertible~~Beauport convertible notes payable consists of the following as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016:

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2017

Beauport Notes Series

Principal Amount

Debt Discount, net

Issuance Costs ~~Discount~~, net

Profit Participation

Net

Series A Convertible

1,200,000

~~(25,827~~–

)

~~(42,561~~–

)

~~(55,237~~–

)

1,~~076~~200,~~375~~000

Series B Convertible

2,~~421~~371,479

–

~~(93,073~~–

)

–

2,~~328~~371,~~406~~479

Series C Convertible

~~874~~624,000

~~(54,849~~–

)

~~(31,010~~–

)

–

~~788~~624,~~141~~000

Series D Convertible

250,000

–

~~(12,969~~–

)

~~(16,001~~–

)

~~221~~250,~~030~~000

4,~~745~~445,479

~~(80,676~~–

)

~~(179,613~~–

)

~~(71,238~~–

)

4,~~413~~445,~~952~~479

Current portion

–

(1,~~420~~450,~~123~~000

)

Profit participation liability

~~122,718~~–

Less current portion, net of profit participation liability

(1,~~297~~450,~~405~~000

)

Convertible notes payable, net of discounts, non-current

32,~~116~~995,~~547~~479

	December 31, 2015
Beauport Notes Series	Principal Amount		Debt Discount, net			Issuance Costs Discount, net			Profit Participation			Net
Series A Convertible	$	1,200,000	$	(58,875	)	$	(98,757	)	$	(90,010	)	$	952,358
Series B Convertible		2,421,479		–			(206,457	)		–			2,215,022
Series C Convertible		874,000		(125,041	)		(71,934	)		–			677,025
Series D Convertible		365,000		–			(30,057	)		(27,379	)		307,564
	$	4,860,479	$	(183,916	)	$	(407,205	)	$	(117,389	)		4,151,969
Current portion													(1,457,068	)
Profit participation liability													197,146
Less current portion, net of profit participation liability													(1,259,922	)
Convertible notes payable, net of discounts, noncurrent												$	2,892,047

F-24

F-23

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

All series of the notes contain provisions that allow for a) pro rata prepayments of the notes by the Company in the event of sales of parcels of the Beauport Property, b) a call option by the Company to prepay the note at any time prior to the six month anniversary of the closing date of the note which includes a 15% premium in the form of the Company’s common stock, and c) an option of the noteholder to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a 10% discount to the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the thirty days’ trading period preceding the date of conversion. The Company has not recorded any beneficial conversion feature as of December 31, 2015 as the embedded conversion options in its notes payable do not meet the firm commitment criterion as described under applicable U.S. GAAP. The Company has the option to extend the maturity date of the notes up to a period of 18 months.

	December 31, 2016
Beauport Notes Series	Principal Amount		Debt Discount, net			Issuance Costs, net			Profit Participation			Net

Series A Convertible	$	1,200,000	$	(25,827	)	$	(42,561	)	$	(55,237	)	$	1,076,375

Series B Convertible		2,421,479		–			(93,073	)		–			2,328,406

Series C Convertible		874,000		(54,849	)		(31,010	)		–			788,141

Series D Convertible		250,000		–			(12,969	)		(16,001	)		221,030

	$	4,745,479	$	(80,676	)	$	(179,613	)	$	(71,238	)		4,413,952

Current portion													(1,420,123	)
Profit participation liability													122,718
Less current portion, net of profit participation liability													(1,297,405	)

Convertible notes payable, net of discounts, noncurrent												$	3,116,547

All series of the notes contain provisions that allow for a) pro rata prepayments of the notes by the Company in the event of sales of parcels of the Beauport Property, b) a call option by the Company to prepay the note at any time prior to the six month anniversary of the closing date of the note which includes a 15% premium in the form of the Company’s common stock, and c) an option of the noteholder to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a 10% discount to the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the thirty days’ trading period preceding the date of conversion. The Company recorded a derivative liability of $649,000 as of December 31, 2017 in relation to the noteholder option. The Company has not recorded any beneficial conversion feature as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 as the embedded conversion option in its notes payable do not meet the firm commitment criterion as described under applicable U.S. GAAP. The Company also has the option to extend the maturity date of the notes up to a period of 18 months.

For the Series A and Series D notes only, the noteholders have an option to call for immediate redemption in full or in part by the Company at a price which the Company shall reasonably determine as being the “fair market value” of the applicable note. As these notes can be immediately redeemable at the option of the noteholder, they have been classified as current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The convertible notes are collateralized by the Beauport property acquired by ROI DEV and contain certain financial and other covenants. OnAs a result of the Company’s going concern disclosure it was unable to remain in compliance with a covenant, however, on April 27, 2015, the Company received written consent of waiver of ~~the~~this default from the required noteholders (greater than 50% of the noteholders in principal amount pari passu) and the applicable covenant was removed to ensure it will not be triggered in the future. As such, the amount representing the long- term portion of the notes payable, net of discounts, of $32,~~116~~995,~~547~~479 and $23,~~892~~116,~~047,~~547 has been classified as noncurrent liabilities as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively. On August 22, 2017, the Company sent a written notice to all of its convertible note holders to notify them that the Company shall execute its option to extend the maturity date of the convertible notes by an additional 18 months.

~~The~~On ~~Beauport~~August ~~Series~~22, A2017, ~~and~~the ~~Series~~Company Dsent ~~notes contain~~ a written ~~premium~~notice ~~payment~~ to ~~the~~all ~~noteholders on each sale~~ of ~~the~~its ~~Beauport~~convertible ~~project~~note inholders ~~an amount equal~~ to ~~fifty~~notify ~~percent~~them ~~(50%)~~that of the ~~noteholder’s pro~~Company ~~rata~~shall ~~share~~execute ofits ~~the~~option ~~total net profit on each parcel of the Beauport project sold. The potential profit in the Beauport project was estimated~~ to beextend ~~approximately $1.2 million, based on management’s best estimates at inception of~~ the ~~notes and as of~~maturity ~~December~~date ~~31, 2015,~~ of ~~which, $197,146 was~~ the ~~pro~~convertible ~~rata share of the Beauport Series A and D noteholders and was recorded as a profit participation liability, embedded within the~~ notes. Asby ofan ~~December~~additional ~~31,~~18 ~~2016, management revised the estimated profit for the project to be approximately $0~~months.9 ~~million and the balance profit participation liability was adjusted to $122,718.~~

~~Beauport Series A Convertible Notes~~F-25

On October 14, 2014, the Company issued $1,200,000 of its Series A convertible notes payable to three investors for cash. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are due October 14, 2017. A total of 282,500 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock were issued in conjunction with the notes to the noteholders at a fair value of $98,875 ($0.35 per share). The $98,875 was recorded as a discount to the notes and $33,048 and $32,958 of the discount has been accreted as interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, resulting in an unamortized discount of $25,827 at December 31, 2016 which will be amortized over the next 10.5 months.

The notes contain a premium payment to the noteholder on each sale of the Beauport project in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the noteholder’s pro rata share of the total net profit on each parcel of the Beauport project sold. The potential profit in the Beauport project at inception of the notes and as of December 31, 2015 was estimated to be approximately $1.2 million based on management’s estimates and third party valuations at those dates, of which, $151,165 was the pro rata share of the Series A noteholders and was recorded as a discount to the notes. As of December 31, 2016, the pro rate share of estimated profit for the Series A noteholders was adjusted to $94,710 to reflect the changes in estimated profit made by management. $34,773 and $50,388 of the discount has been accreted as interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, resulting in an unamortized discount of $55,237 at December 31, 2016 which will be amortized over the next 10.5 months.

The effective interest rate for the Series A convertible notes was 20.6% and 21.6% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

F-24

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

The Beauport Series A and Series D notes contain a premium payment to the noteholders on each sale of the Beauport project in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the noteholder’s pro rata share of the total net profit on each parcel of the Beauport project sold. The potential profit in the Beauport project was estimated to be approximately $1.2 million, based on management’s best estimates at inception of the notes and as of December 31, 2015, of which, $197,146 was the pro rata share of the Beauport Series A and D noteholders and was recorded as a profit participation liability, embedded within the notes. As of December 31, 2016, management revised the estimated profit for the project to be approximately $0.9 million and the balance profit participation liability was adjusted to $122,718. In fiscal year 2017, due to its continued difficulties with completing the zoning conversion the Company determined that it would not be able to develop the acquired land in the foreseeable future. The Company will continue its discussions with the appropriate authorities to expedite the timing of zoning conversion, however at the same time has started discussions with potential partners and buyers to take over some or all of its interest in the project. Based on the revised forecast for the project, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $972,097 and reversed the $122,718 profit participation liability to interest income during the year ended December 31, 2017 given lower expected profit for the project.

Beauport Series A Convertible Notes

On October 14, 2014, the Company issued $1,200,000 of its Series A convertible notes payable to three investors for cash. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are due April 14, 2019, as extended. A total of 282,500 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock were issued in conjunction with the notes to the noteholders at a fair value of $98,875 ($0.35 per share). The $98,875 was recorded as a discount to the notes and $25,827 and $33,048 of the discount has been accreted as interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in no unamortized discount balance at December 31, 2017.

The notes contain a premium payment to the noteholder on each sale of the Beauport project in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the noteholder’s pro rata share of the total net profit on each parcel of the Beauport project sold. The potential profit in the Beauport project at inception of the notes and as of December 31, 2015 was estimated to be approximately $1.2 million based on management’s estimates and third party valuations at those dates, of which, $151,165 was the pro rata share of the Series A noteholders and was recorded as a discount to the notes. As of December 31, 2016, the pro rate share of estimated profit for the Series A noteholders was adjusted to $94,710 to reflect the changes in estimated profit made by management. $55,237 and $34,773 of the discount has been accreted as interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in no unamortized discount balance at December 31, 2017.

The effective interest rates for the Series A convertible notes were 20.0% and 20.6% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Beauport Series B Convertible Notes

On October 14, 2014, the Company issued $2,900,497 of its Series B convertible notes payable to thirty-three investors for cash. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum and are due ~~October~~ April 14, ~~2017~~2019, as extended. During the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2017, ~~the Company redeemed notes totaling~~ $~~479~~50,~~018~~000 ~~note~~of ~~from~~this ~~two~~note ~~noteholders, under~~was aconverted ~~pre-existing~~to ~~agreement with the noteholder~~1, ~~for EUR 360~~009,~~000~~955 shares ($~~395,569),~~0.0495 ~~resulting~~per inshare) aof ~~gain from~~ the ~~extinguishment~~Company’s ~~of the~~Series ~~debt~~A ofcommon ~~$83,449~~stock.

The effective interest ~~rate~~rates for the Series B convertible notes ~~was~~were 1211.86% and 1312.8% for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

F-26

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

Beauport Series C Convertible Notes

On October 14, 2014, the Company issued $874,000 of its Series C convertible notes payable to an investor for cash. The note bears interest at 10% per annum and is due ~~October~~ April 14, ~~2017~~2019, as extended. A total of 600,000 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock were issued in conjunction with the note to the noteholder at a fair value of $210,000 ($0.35 per share) were recorded as a discount to the note. ~~The~~During the year ended December 31, 2017, $~~210~~250,000 ~~was~~of ~~recorded~~this asnote awas ~~discount~~converted to 2,692,998 shares ($0.0928 per share) of the ~~note~~Company’s Series ~~and~~A common stock. $7054,~~192~~849 and $70,~~000~~ 192 of the discount has been accreted as interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 ~~2016~~ and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, resulting in an no unamortized discount ofbalance ~~$54,849~~ at December 31, ~~2016 which will be amortized over the next 10~~2017.~~5 months.~~

The effective interest ~~rate~~rates for the Series C convertible notes ~~was~~were 2219.9% and 22.69% for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

Beauport Series D Convertible Notes

On October 14, 2014, the Company issued $365,000 of its Series D convertible notes payable to five investors for cash. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are due ~~October~~ April 14, ~~2017~~2019, as extended. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company redeemed $115,000 of its notes payable issued to two investors.

The notes contain a premium payment to ~~the~~ the noteholder on each sale of the Beauport project in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the noteholder’s pro rata ~~share~~ share of the total net profit on each parcel of the Beauport project sold. The potential profit in the Beauport project at inception of the notes and as of December 31, 2015 was estimated to be approximately $1.2 million based on management’s estimates and third-party valuations at those dates, of which, $45,981 was the pro rata share of the Series D noteholders. As of December 31, 2016, the pro rate share of estimated profit for the Series D noteholders was adjusted to $28,008 to reflect the changes in estimated profit made by management. $1116,~~378~~001 and $1511,~~326~~378 of the discount has been accreted as interest expense for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, resulting in anno unamortized discount ofbalance ~~$16,001~~ at December 31, ~~2016 which will be amortized over the next 10~~2017.~~5 months.~~

The effective interest ~~rate~~rates for the Series D convertible notes ~~was~~were 19.57% and 1819.95% for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

Interest on Beauport Convertible Notes Payable

As a condition of the convertible note agreements, the Company has placed the first year’s interest in escrow with an agent who made monthly interest payments to the noteholders on the Company’s behalf. A total of $410,135 was funded to the escrow agent during the year ended December 31, 2014 and additional amounts of $427,631 and $173,827 were funded during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The escrow agent paid a total of $323,825 and $446,091 to noteholders during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, resulting in a balance of cash in escrow of $155,938 and $52,132 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, $433,220 and $449,535, respectively, of interest was accrued and expensed on the notes and $323,825 and $446,091, respectively, was paid by the escrow agent, resulting in remaining accruals of $130,221 and $20,826 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

~~F-25~~$333,761 and $427,631 were funded to escrow during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The escrow agent paid a total of $398,002 and $323,825 to noteholders during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in a balance of cash in escrow of $91,698 and $155,938 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, $387,323 and $433,220, respectively, of interest was accrued and expensed on the notes and $365,918 and $323,825, respectively, was paid by the escrow agent. The Company also directly paid interest to noteholders of $17,500 and $-0- during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in remaining accruals of $134,125 and $130,221 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

F-27

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

Debt Issuance Costs on Beauport Convertible Notes Payable

During ~~the~~fiscal year ~~ended December 31,~~ 2014, the Company paid cash of $570,543, issued 258,111 shares of its Series A common stock at a fair value of $90,339 ($0.35 per share) based on the price of shares sold to investors, and had recorded 246,683 shares of Series A common stock to be issued as a liability at a fair value of $86,338 ($0.35 per share), for a total of $747,220 of debt issuance costs recorded as a debt discount to the ~~convertible~~ convertible notes. $227,624 and $287,471 has been amortized as interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, resulting in a balance of debt issuance costs discount of $179,613 at December 31, 2016, which will be amortized over the next 10.5 months.

~~Mortgage~~$179,613 ~~Notes~~and ~~Payable~~$227,624 has been amortized as interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in no unamortized debt issuance costs discount balance at December 31, 2017.

OnMortgage ~~October~~Notes 9, 2015, the Company entered into a mortgage loan agreement for $937,170 (CAD 1,300,000). At closing, the Company returned $72,090 (CAD 100,000) to the lender as a reduction of the principal resulting in a balance of $865,080 (CAD 1,200,000) at December 31, 2015. The loan bears interest at 20% per annum and ~~was~~Loans due December 9, 2015. The loan is collateralized by first rank mortgages on the Company’s Kenney Street and Park Avenue properties and second rank mortgages on its Kitimat and Beauport properties and is guaranteed by the Company’s President. On December 29, 2015, the Company and the lender entered into an extension agreement on the loan of three months until March 13, 2016 for a fee of $21,870 (CAD 30,000) and on March 15, 2016 the Company and lender entered into a second extension agreement of an additional three months until June 13, 2016 for a fee of $7,930 (CAD 11,000) and the Company continued to make extensions on the loan in 2016 for a total fee of $179,168 (CAD 237,309). The Company incurred $348,901 (CAD 462,120) of interest expense including fees and penalties and paid $342,172 (CAD 453,208) of interest and $223,756 (CAD 296,366) of principal during the year ended December 31, 2016, whereas the Company incurred and paid $31,785 (CAD 43,333) during the same period in 2015. The Company is current on its payment of interest and penalty fees, however, it remains to be in default on its principal repayment. The Company is currently in discussions with the lender to enter into a loan amendment agreement to further extend the maturity date.Payable

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received a total of $1,500,000 from Alternative Strategy Partners Pte. Ltd., a Singapore limited company (“ASP”), in connection with the Company’s Dubai Sobha Hartland Acquisition and Development Project (“Sobha Dubai Project”). Pursuant to an agreement between the parties dated February 24, 2016, the Company agreed to issue to ASP certain notes (“ASP notes”) which shall have a two year maturity, bear interest at 8% per annum payable quarterly and have a mortgage on the First Plot of the Sobha Dubai Project, subordinated to loans from banks or other institutional lenders, if such a lien is determined to be valid and enforceable under Dubai law, otherwise, the notes shall be secured by a lien, similarly subordinated, upon all of the stock of the ROI Land Investments Ltd., the beneficial owner of the Sobha Dubai Project. The ASP notes also contain an option either to convert all or part of its notes to the Company’s Series A common stock at $1.00 per share or to redeem all or part of its investment. Additionally, the ASP notes allowed ASP to receive certain profit participation of up to 50% of the net profits upon sale of the First Plot. On May 15, 2016, the Company received a termination letter from PNC terminating the agreement dated February 7, 2016 for non-payment of the amounts due under the agreement. As a result, the Company forfeited the deposits paid to PNC and defaulted on the ASP notes. The Company is currently in discussions with ASP to amend the terms of the notes. $104,219 of interest expense has been accrued on the notes as of December 31, 2016.

	December 31, 2017								December 31, 2016
Mortgage Notes and Loans	Principal Amount		Issuance Costs, net			Net Amount			Principal Amount		Issuance Costs, net			Net Amount

Colorado Seller Note	$	2,378,667	$	–		$	2,378,667		$	3,350,000	$	–		$	3,350,000

Mortgage Loan – North America		438,605		–			438,605			671,039		–			671,039

Colorado Convertible Note		1,000,000		–			1,000,000			500,000		–			500,000

ROI SEC Notes – North America
Euro Notes		3,713,366		(221,541	)		3,491,825			1,580,400		(90,458	)		1,489,942
US Dollar Notes		1,125,988		(148,655	)		977,333			–		–			–

ROI SEC Notes – Dubai (UAE)
Euro Notes		2,156,148		(117,318	)		2,038,830			–		–			–
US Dollar Notes		516,158		(29,329	)		486,829			–		–			–

Valescore Loans		415,000		–			415,000			415,000		–			415,000

Other		14,308		–			14,308			37,908		–			37,908

	$	11,758,240	$	(516,843	)		11,241,397		$	6,554,347	$	(90,458	)		6,463,889

Less current portion							(4,246,580	)							(4,436,039	)
Mortgage notes and loans payable, net of discounts, non-current						$	6,994,817							$	2,027,850

~~During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company, through its wholly~~F-owned subsidiary ROI SEC, issued a total of $1,580,400 (EUR 1,500,000) of its notes payable to two investors for cash. The notes bear interest at 7% per annum payable quarterly and have a maturity date of June 30, 2020. Pursuant to a loan facility agreement between ROI SEC and ROI DEV dated May 19, 2016, the notes hold security interests in the Company’s properties in British Columbia (Kenney Street, Park Avenue and Kitimat), Beauport and Colorado. $23,560 (EUR 22,361) of interest expense has been accrued on the notes as of December 31, 2016. The Company also issued 350,000 shares of Series B preferred stock at a fair value of $94,500 ($0.27 per share) recorded as a debt discount to the notes. $4,042 has been amortized as interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2016, resulting in a balance of debt issuance costs discount of $90,458 at December 31, 2016, which will be amortized over the next 39 months.28

F-26

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

~~Loans~~Colorado ~~Payable~~Seller Note

~~As of December 31, 2014, the Company agreed to assume CTC’s land loan on the Kitimat property in the amount of $1,160,865 (CAD 1,350,000). The loan was fully paid on April 22, 2015.~~ On June 8, 2015, in connection with the acquisition of the Evans, Colorado property (see Note 5 – Real Estate Held for Development and Sale), the Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $3,350,000 to the seller. The note was due June 5, 2016, collateralized by the property bearing interest at 6% per annum. On May 3, 2016, the Company paid $100,000 as an extension fee to extend the maturity date of the note by ninety days through September 5, 2016 at 8% interest per annum. The Company subsequently defaulted on the note but cured its default by paying a $167,500 fee to the seller and 18% interest starting from October 15, 2016. On March 31, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with the seller to restructure the note by making a partial repayment of $1,300,000 against the principal, and an additional $237,536 as prepayment of interest through maturity at March 30, 2018. The terms of the note were modified so that after converting $201,829 of accrued interest into principal, the remaining principal of $2,378,667 shall bear 10% annual interest with a first lien on the property. ~~For~~On ~~the~~March ~~years~~2018, ~~ended~~the ~~December~~Company ~~31,~~entered ~~2016~~into ~~and~~another ~~2015,~~amendment ~~interest~~to ~~expense~~the ofnote ~~$360,171~~by repaying ~~and~~ $~~115~~1,~~017~~378,677 ~~respectively, was~~of ~~accrued~~the principal balance and ~~interest~~prepaying ~~payments~~a of12% ~~$239,833~~annual ~~and~~interest of $~~100~~120,~~525,~~000 ~~respectively,~~through ~~were~~its ~~made~~new ~~resulting~~extended inmaturity date ~~accrued~~to ~~interest~~March ~~balances of $134~~30,~~829 and~~ ~~$14,492, respectively~~2019.

~~During~~For the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2017, ~~the~~interest ~~Company~~expense ~~borrowed a total~~ of $~~415~~245,~~000~~163 ~~from~~(2016: ~~Valescore Ltd.~~$360,171) awas ~~Swiss company. The loans are unsecured~~accrued, ~~bear~~ interest atpayments 8%of ~~per annum and are due at various dates beginning January 1~~$237,551 (2016.: ~~On April 2~~$239,833) ~~2016, the due dates of all of the notes~~ were ~~extended~~made toand ~~December 30~~$201,829 (2016: $-0-) byof ~~the~~accrued ~~lender~~interest ~~and,~~was onconverted ~~September~~into 29principal, ~~2017,~~resulting ~~the~~in ~~due~~accrued ~~dates~~interest ~~were~~balances ~~further~~of ~~extended to December 31, 2017.~~ $36(59,~~341~~388) ~~and~~(2016: $5134,~~150 of~~829) ~~interest expense has been accrued on the loans as of~~ at December 31, ~~2016 and 2015, respectively~~2017.

OnMortgage ~~November~~Loan ~~29,~~– ~~2016,~~North the Company borrowed a $500,000 short-term bridge loan from an investor. The loan is secured by the Evans, Colorado property, bears fixed interest of $30,000 at maturity and is due on January 13, 2017. The lender is also entitled to 100,000 shares of Series B preferred shares of Series B preferred stock, however, no value was allocated to these shares as their fair values at inception was estimated to be equal to nominal value. The Company has not issued these shares as of December 31, 2016. The Company subsequently entered into default, however on March 31, 2017, the Company and the lender entered into a convertible note agreement whereby the Company shall issue a convertible note of $1,000,000 for $500,000 in cash and $500,000 in exchange for the outstanding short-term bridge loan. The convertible note, also secured by a second lien on the Evans, Colorado property, bears 4% interest payable and matures on March 31, 2018 unless certain project development milestones are met or the parties mutually agree to a new maturity date. The convertible note shall be automatically convertible into 6% equity interest of the special purpose entity for the Evans Colorado project upon the Company reaching certain project development milestones. $21,333 of interest expense has been accrued on the loan as of December 31, 2016.America

~~Performance-Linked~~On ~~Notes~~October ~~Payable~~9, 2015, the Company entered into a mortgage loan agreement for $937,170 (CAD 1,300,000). At closing, the Company returned $72,090 (CAD 100,000) to the lender as a reduction of the principal resulting in a balance of $865,080 (CAD 1,200,000) at December 31, 2015. The loan bears interest at 20% per annum and was due December 9, 2015. The loan is collateralized by first rank mortgages on the Company’s Kenney Street and Park Avenue properties and second rank mortgages on its Kitimat and Beauport properties and is guaranteed by the Company’s President. On December 29, 2015, the Company and the lender entered into an extension agreement on the loan of three months until March 13, 2016 for a fee of $21,870 (CAD 30,000) and on March 15, 2016 the Company and lender entered into a second extension agreement of an additional three months until June 13, 2016 for a fee of $7,930 (CAD 11,000) and the Company continued to make extensions on the loan in 2016 for a total fee of $179,168 (CAD 237,309). The Company made repayments of principal of $276,792 (CAD 356,507) and $223,756 (CAD 296,366) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company is current on its payment of interest and penalty fees, however, it remains to be in default on its principal repayment. The Company is currently in discussions with the lender to enter into a loan amendment agreement to further extend the maturity date.

	December 31, 2016							December 31, 2015
Note Series	Principal Amount		Issuance Costs Discount, net			Net Amount		Principal Amount		Issuance Costs Discount, net			Net Amount
Kitimat Series A	$	2,292,830	$	(96,278	)	$	2,196,552	$	2,442,830	$	(167,904	)	$	2,274,926
Kitimat Series B		473,117		–			473,117		473,117		–			473,117
Terrace Series A		746,121		(23,332	)		722,789		722,178		(38,529	)		683,649
	$	3,512,068	$	(119,610	)		3,392,458	$	3,638,125	$	(206,433	)		3,431,692
Less current portion							–							–
Notes payable, net of discounts, non-current						$	3,392,458						$	3,431,692

During fiscal year 2017 and 2016, the Company also incurred $101,757 (CAD 131,063) and $348,901 (CAD 462,120), respectively, of interest expense including fees and penalties and paid interest of $106,497 (CAD 137,168) and $342,172 (CAD 453,208), respectively, resulting in accrued interest balance of $2,237 (CAD 2,808) at December 31, 2017.

F-2729

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

Colorado Convertible Note

On November 29, 2016, the Company borrowed a $500,000 short-term bridge loan from an investor. The loan is secured by the Evans, Colorado property, bears fixed interest of $30,000 at maturity and is due on January 13, 2017. The lender is also entitled to 100,000 shares of Series B preferred shares of Series B preferred stock, however, no value was allocated to these shares as their fair values at inception was estimated to be equal to nominal value. The Company has not issued these shares as of December 31, 2017. The Company subsequently entered into default, however on March 31, 2017, the Company and the lender entered into a convertible note agreement whereby the Company shall issue a convertible note of $1,000,000 for $500,000 in cash and $500,000 in exchange for the outstanding short-term bridge loan. The convertible note, also secured by a second lien on the Evans, Colorado property, bears 4% interest payable and matures on March 31, 2018 unless certain project development milestones are met or the parties mutually agree to a new maturity date. The convertible note shall be automatically convertible into 6% equity interest of the special purpose entity for the Evans Colorado project upon the Company reaching certain project development milestones. On March 31, 2018, the Company defaulted on this convertible note and is in discussions with the noteholder to extend its maturity to cure such default.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, $54,361 and $21,333, respectively, of interest expense was capitalized on the project on the loan and $50,750 and $-0-, respectively, was paid, resulting in accrued interest balances of $24,944 and $21,333 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

ROI SEC Notes – North America

During fiscal year 2016, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary ROI SEC, issued a total of $1,580,400 (EUR 1,500,000) of its notes payable to two investors for cash. The Company also issued 350,000 shares of Series B preferred stock at a fair value of $94,500 ($0.27 per share) recorded as a debt issuance costs to the notes.

During fiscal year 2017, the Company issued an additional $3,258,954 (EUR 1,600,000 and USD 1,000,000) of notes to five investors for cash and paid a total of $405,283 in cash as debt issuance costs. The notes bear interest ranging between 7% and 8% per annum payable quarterly, mature on various dates starting from June 30, 2020 and include certain profit sharing provisions allowing up to ten percent of net profit of the underlying project. Pursuant to a loan facility agreement between ROI SEC and ROI DEV dated May 19, 2016, the notes hold security interests in the Company’s properties in British Columbia (Kenney Street, Park Avenue and Kitimat), Beauport and Colorado.

$258,399 (EUR 215,717) and $23,560 (EUR 22,361) of interest expenses were incurred on the notes during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, $95,845 and $4,042 of debt issuance costs were amortized as interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in a balance of debt issuance costs discount of $305,396 at December 31, 2017, which are amortized over the term of the notes.

ROI SEC Notes – Dubai (UAE)

During fiscal year 2017, the Company issued, through its wholly-owned subsidiary ROI SEC, an additional $2,672,306 (EUR 1,800,000 and USD 500,000) of notes to three investors for cash and paid a total of $160,338 in cash as debt issuance costs. The notes bear interest ranging between 7% and 8% per annum payable quarterly and matures in three years after the first deployment of the loan proceeds. The proceeds from these notes were used to provide a loan to FL2, a Dubai U.A.E. company in which the Company owns a 25% interest since April 2018, which allows the notes to hold security interest against the Dubai Swarovski Towers property owned by FL2.

$44,874 (EUR 37,462) and $-0- of interest expenses were accrued on the notes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, $13,691 and $-0- of debt issuance costs were amortized as interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in a balance of debt issuance costs discount of $146,647 at December 31, 2017, which are amortized over the term of the notes.

F-30

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

Valescore Loans

During fiscal year 2015, the Company borrowed a total of $415,000 from Valescore Ltd., a Swiss company. The loans are unsecured, bear interest at 8% per annum and are due at various dates beginning January 1, 2016. The maturity dates of the loan were extended to various dates beginning December 31, 2018.

$70,004 and $36,341 of interest expense have been accrued on the loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Performance-Linked Notes Payable

	December 31, 2017								December 31, 2016
Note Series	Principal Amount		Issuance Costs Discount, net			Net Amount			Principal Amount		Issuance Costs Discount, net			Net Amount

Kitimat Series A	$	2,292,830	$	(24,856	)	$	2,267,974		$	2,292,830	$	(96,278	)	$	2,196,552

Kitimat Series B		473,117		–			473,117			473,117		–			473,117

Terrace Series A		798,003		(8,179	)		789,824			746,121		(23,332	)		722,789

	$	3,563,950	$	(33,035	)		3,530,915		$	3,512,068	$	(119,610	)		3,392,458

Less current portion							(3,530,915	)							–

Notes payable, net of discounts, non-current						$	–							$	3,392,458

The Kitimat and Terrace series of the notes contain provisions that allow for a) pro rata prepayments of the notes by the Company in the event of sales of parcels of the respective project and b) a call option by the Company to prepay the note at any time prior to the six-month anniversary of the closing date of the note. The Company also has the option to extend the maturity date of the notes up to a period of 18 months.

On March 23, 2018, the Company sent a written notice to all of its Kitimat (Series A and Series B) note holders to notify them that the Company shall execute its option to extend the maturity date of the notes by an additional 18 months. On May 31, 2018, the Company also sent a written notice to all of its Terrace note holders to notify them about the exercise of the Company’s option to extend the maturity date of the notes by an additional 18 months.

Kitimat Series A Notes

On May 8, 2015, the Company issued $2,442,830 of its Kitimat Series A notes payable to twenty-nine investors for cash. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum, are due May 8, 2018, and are collateralized by a secured interest in the Kitimat property. The Series A notes contain an option by the Company to prepay the notes on a pro rata basis in the event of sales of the Kitimat project in an amount equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the net profits realized on such sales.

The effective interest rate for the Series A notes was 11.30% and 1011.93% for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

F-31

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

Kitimat Series B Notes

On May 8, 2015, the Company issued $473,117 of its Kitimat Series B notes payable to two investors for cash. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum, are due May 8, 2018, and are collateralized by a secured interest in the Kitimat property. The Series B notes contain an option by the Company to prepay the notes on a pro rata basis in the event of sales of the Kitimat project in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the net profits realized on such sales.

The effective interest rate for the Series B notes was 87.19% and 8.01% for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

Terrace Series A Notes

On July 17, 2015, the Company issued $824,416 (CAD 1,001,774) of its Terrace Series A notes payable to six investors for cash. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum, are due July 17, 2018, and are collateralized by a secured interest in the Terrace property. The Series A notes contain an option by the Company to prepay the notes on a pro rata basis in the event of sales of the Terrace project in an amount equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the net profits realized on such sales.

The effective interest rate for the Series B notes was 109.27% and 910.32% for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

Interest on Performance-linked Notes Payable

As a condition of the note agreements, ~~the~~ the Company shall place the first year’s interest in escrow with an agent who will make monthly interest payments to the ~~noteholders~~ noteholders on the Company’s behalf. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, $287,648 and $180,372, respectively, of interest was accrued and expensed on the notes and $227,240 and $194,382, respectively, was paid by the escrow agent, resulting in a remaining accrual of $40,224 at December 31, 2016 and $(14,010) at December 31, 2015.

$365,236 and $267,429 were funded to escrow during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The escrow agent paid a total of $322,835 and $227,240 to noteholders during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in a balance of cash in escrow of $82,625 and $40,224 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, $281,948 and $287,648, respectively, of interest was accrued and expensed on the notes and $261,420 and $227,240, respectively, was paid by the escrow agent. The Company also directly paid interest to noteholders of $39,313 and $-0- during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in a remaining accrual of $27,613 and $40,224 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Debt Issuance Costs on Performance-linked Notes Payable

During ~~the~~fiscal year ~~ended December 31,~~ 2015, the Company paid cash of $169,737 and has recorded 117,921 shares of Series A common stock to be issued as a liability at a fair value of $90,009 ($0.76 per share), based on the price of shares sold to investors, for a total of $259,746 of debt issuance costs recorded as as a debt discount to the notes. $86,~~823~~575 and $5386,~~313~~823 has been amortized as interest expense during the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2016~~ 2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively, resulting in a balance of debt issuance costs discount of $~~119~~33,~~610~~035 at December 31, 2017 (2016: $119,610) which will be amortized over the next 164 months.

F-2832

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 7 – Notes and Loans Payable (Continued)

Deposits on Notes Payable

To fund the development of the Company’s new and existing projects, the Company ishas ~~seeking~~received ~~subscriptions~~deposits for the future issuances of new series of notes payable. The terms and provisions of the notes, toinclude becomponents ~~described~~such as ~~“BC~~options ~~Series~~for 2”repayment, ~~“Colorado”, and~~extension ~~“Dubai”.~~of ~~The~~maturity ~~terms~~and conversion and ~~provisions~~profit participation ofrights to the ~~notes~~note ~~are~~holders, ~~yet~~none of which were assess to be embedded ~~determined~~derivatives atwhich ~~year-end~~would ~~and,~~need asto ~~such,~~be accounted for separately from the deposits ~~have~~ ~~been~~on ~~classified~~notes aspayable, ~~current~~except ~~liabilities~~the inoption to extend the ~~accompanying~~maturity ~~consolidated~~that ~~balance~~is ~~sheets.~~not Asclosely ofrelated ~~December 31,~~to ~~2016~~the host debt instrument and ~~2015, the~~must ~~Company~~therefore ~~received~~be ~~deposits~~bifurcated ofand ~~$5,588,227~~measured at inception and ~~$3,741,821,~~subsequently ~~respectively,~~at ~~net~~fair value. As of ~~issuance~~inception and ~~costs~~as ofat ~~$801~~year-end,~~825~~ the value of such derivative was assessed to be immaterial and ~~$284~~therefore,~~673,~~ ~~respectively,~~no value was recorded. The ~~for~~Company ~~subscriptions~~believes that the impact arising from these derivative instruments are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements for the ~~future~~year ~~notes~~ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Debt Maturities

	December 31, 2017								December 31, 2016
Deposits on Notes Payable	Principal Amount		Issuance Costs Discount, net			Net Amount			Principal Amount		Issuance Costs Discount, net			Net Amount

Colorado Series A Notes	$	4,811,207	$	(242,915	)	$	4,568,292		$	2,889,942	$	(235,131	)	$	2,654,811

Colorado Series B Notes		1,876,304		(55,194	)		1,821,110			1,844,122		(96,733	)		1,747,389

Colorado Series C Notes		1,778,824		(187,772	)		1,591,052			–		–			–

Colorado Series D Notes		100,000		–			100,000			–		–			–

Dubai Series A Notes		500,000		–			500,000			–		–			–

Dubai Series C Notes		2,395,720		(185,183	)		2,210,537			–		–			–

Terrace Series B Notes		1,784,221		(43,864	)		1,740,357			1,655,988		(46,119	)		1,609,869

	$	13,246,276	$	(714,928	)		12,531,348		$	6,390,052	$	(377,982	)		6,012,070

Less current portion							(12,531,348	)							(6,012,070	)
Notes payable, net of discounts, non-current						$	–							$	–

~~Future debt maturities are as follows:~~F-33

December 31,
2017	$	15,029,703
2018		6,807,547
2019		–
2020		1,513,441
2021 and thereafter		–
Total	$	23,350,691

Note 8 – Related Party Transactions

The Company leases a corporate apartment for Sebastien Cliche the Company’s President, a month-to-month basis. Monthly rental is $1,906 and total rent paid for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $5,719. This lease was cancelled on March 31, 2016. The Company also had $65,744 of accrued expenses due to Sebastien Cliche as of December 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred business related expenses for Philippe Germain, the Company’s former Co-President, totaling $2,080 and $8,100, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company leased a corporate apartment for Philippe Germain on a month-to-month basis. Monthly rental was $675 and total rent paid for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2,080 and $6,075, respectively. This lease was cancelled on March 31, 2016. The Company also had $148,634 of accrued compensation due to Philippe Germain as of December 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company entered into two loan agreements with Philippe Germain totaling $103,488. The loans are unsecured, due in ninety days and bear interest at 8% per annum. $35,760 of the loan was repaid resulting in a principal balance of $67,705 and no accrued interest as of December 31, 2016. The funds were used for the Company’s general working capital purpose.

The Company leases a corporate apartment for Louise Gagner on a month-to-month basis. Ms. Gagner is the mother of Philippe Germain. Monthly rental is $1,000 and total rent paid for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $3,000 and $12,000, respectively. This lease was cancelled as of March 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into multiple loan agreements with LMM Group Ltd. (“LMM”), a Swiss company, and received a total of $248,168. The loans are unsecured, bear interest at 8% per annum and are due at various dates beginning January 1, 2016. On December 10, 2015, $150,000 of the notes was assigned from LMM to 8010609 Canada Inc. The balance of the loans from LMM as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 is $62,488 and $98,168, respectively, and the balance of accrued interest is $11,445 and $5,978, respectively. Philippe Germain is the sole shareholder of LMM.

On October 29, 2015, 8010609 Canada Inc. loaned the Company $36,475 which was repaid on November 20, 2015. Additionally, on December 10, 2015, the $150,000 note held by LMM was assigned to 8010609 Canada Inc. On the same date, the Company repaid $50,000 of the note. The notes are unsecured, bear interest at 8% per annum and are due on December 30, 2017. The balance of the loans from 8010609 Canada Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 is $100,000 and $100,000, respectively, and interest was accrued on the loans for $8,667 and $667, respectively. The Company also incurred $50,000 of consulting fees to 8010609 Canada Inc. during the year ended December 31, 2016 of which $12,121 remained outstanding as of December 31, 2016. Philippe Germain is also the sole shareholder of 8010609 Canada Inc.

F-29

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 87 – ~~Related~~Notes ~~Party~~and ~~Transactions~~Loans Payable (Continued)

OnColorado ~~October~~Series ~~13,~~A 2015, the Company assumed a second mortgage note due to 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. of $288,360 (CAD 400,000). 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. and the owner of 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. are shareholders of the Company. The loan is secured by a second rank mortgage on a property owned by CTC, bears interest at 6% per annum and was due April 13, 2016. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the principal balance of the loan was $297,040 and $288,360, respectively, and accrued interest was $12,020 and $3,745, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, the note is in default but the Company is currently in negotiation with the note holder for an extension.Notes

During the years ended December 31, ~~2016 and~~2017 ~~2015~~and 2016, the Company ~~incurred~~received $671,~~212~~300,762 (EUR 1,163,000) and $301,~~000~~938,500 (EUR 2,158,493), respectively, in cash in exchange for future issuance of its Colorado Series A notes payable to ~~Maxim~~a ~~Cliche~~total of thirty-three investors. The notes are denominated in Euros, bear ~~the~~interest ~~brother~~at of7% ~~Sebastien~~per ~~Cliche~~annum, ~~for~~mature ~~consulting services~~on April 30, 2019 and are collateralized by the Company’s Colorado property. $20126,~~035~~782 and ~~was~~$162,765 ~~due~~in todebt ~~Maxim~~issuance ~~Cliche~~costs were recorded as ofdebt ~~December~~discount ~~31,~~to the notes during 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company ~~entered~~incurred ~~into~~$332,289 ~~two~~and ~~loan~~$175,631 ~~agreements~~respectively, ~~with~~of ~~Louis~~interest ~~Gagner~~expenses ~~totaling~~and had accrued interest balance of $87101,~~130.~~471 and Ms$65,731 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. ~~Gagner~~ isThese interest expenses were capitalized to the ~~mother~~project ofas ~~Philippe~~real ~~Germain.~~estate ~~The~~held ~~loans~~for ~~are~~development ~~unsecured~~and sale on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, ~~due~~2017 inand ~~ninety~~2016, ~~days~~respectively. Additionally, $222,872 and ~~bear~~$-0- noof ~~interest.~~debt ~~The~~issuance ~~funds~~costs were ~~used~~accreted ~~for~~as interest expense during the ~~Company’s~~years ~~general~~ended ~~working~~December ~~capital~~31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, ~~purpose~~resulting in an remaining debt issuance costs discount balance of $242,915 at December 31, 2017.

~~The~~Colorado ~~Company~~Series ~~has~~B $432,750 of accrued compensation due to SF International Consulting Limited as of December 31, 2016. SF International Consulting Limited is an entity controlled by Slim Feriani, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer.Notes

~~The~~During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company ~~has~~received $~~121~~-0- and $487,~~615~~906 respectively, in cash in exchange for future issuance of ~~accrued~~its ~~compensation~~Colorado Series B ~~due~~notes payable to ~~Gulf~~eight ~~Central~~investors. ~~Agency~~The ~~Assets~~notes ~~Management~~are ~~Ltd~~denominated in U.S asDollars, ofbear ~~December~~interest 31at 8% per annum, ~~2016~~mature on April 30, 2019 and are collateralized by the Company’s Colorado property. ~~Slim~~$-0- ~~Feriani~~and is$44,942 in debt issuance costs were recorded as debt discount to the ~~Chairman~~notes ofduring ~~this~~2017 ~~entity~~and 2016, respectively.

~~The~~During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company ~~has~~incurred $~~467~~168,~~003~~298 and $118,760, respectively, of interest expense and had accrued ~~compensation~~interest balance of $31,218 and $15,956 at December 31, 2017, respectively. These interest expenses ~~due~~were capitalized to ~~Martin~~the ~~Scholz,~~project as real estate held for development and sale on the ~~Company’s~~consolidated ~~Chief~~balance ~~Executive~~sheet ~~Officer~~at December 31, as2017 and 2016, respectively. Additionally, $80,335 and $-0- of debt issuance costs were accreted as interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in an remaining debt issuance costs discount balance of $55,194 at December 31, 2017.

OnColorado ~~September~~Series ~~10,~~C 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 14,400 shares of Capital Evolution Groupe SAS (“CEG”), a French limited liability company, for $112,187 (EUR 100,000). The Company’s Co-President, Philippe Germain, is a shareholder of CEG. As of December 31, 2015, $112,187 was paid for the investment and was classified as an acquisition deposit in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position. On April 5, 2016, the Company agreed to acquire an additional 144,459 shares of CEG for $1,575,686 (EUR 1,444,590) from Philippe Germain, subject to completion of due diligence by the Company and official registration of the shares in France. The shares to be acquired will bring the Company’s interest in CEG to 58% once the transaction was consummated. On April 5, 2016, the total consideration for the shares was adjusted to $551,490 (EUR 505,607) by mutual agreement between the parties. During the year ended December 2016, the Company and the shareholders of CEG agreed to rescind the share purchase agreement, to reverse all past investments, expenditures and payables related to CEG and to reimburse the Company for the net balance of $21,038. The Company recorded a net loss from investment in CEG of $164,952 during the year ended December 31, 2016 and classified the amount to be reimbursed to the Company as advances to related party in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Management believes that such amount is recoverable as of December 31, 2016 and that no provision is necessary.Notes

During the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2017 and 2016, the Company ~~paid~~received $~~257~~1,~~573~~744,300 (EUR 1,485,000) and ~~issued~~$-0-, ~~149~~respectively,~~004~~ ~~shares~~in cash in exchange for future issuance of its Colorado Series AC ~~common~~notes ~~stock~~payable ~~valued~~to ata ~~$150,484~~total toof ~~Acadian~~fourteen ~~Advisors~~investors. ~~and~~The ~~Associates (“Acadian”),~~notes aare ~~subsidiary~~denominated ofin ~~CEG~~Euros, ~~for~~bear ~~equity~~interest ~~and~~at ~~debt~~7% ~~issuance~~per ~~costs.~~annum, mature ~~During~~after ~~the~~three ~~year~~years ~~ended~~and ~~December~~are ~~31,~~collateralized ~~2016,~~by the Company’s ~~incurred~~Colorado property. $~~352~~198,~~003~~919 toand ~~Acadian~~$-0- ~~for~~in debt issuance costs. were ~~The~~recorded ~~Company~~as ~~had~~debt ~~outstanding~~discount ~~balances due~~ to ~~Acadian~~the ofnotes ~~$124,576~~during ~~and $148,271~~2017 ~~as of December 31, 2016~~ and ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

During the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2017 and 2016, the Company ~~paid~~incurred $~~156~~31,~~286~~906 and ~~has~~$-0-, ~~accrued 58~~respectively,~~949~~ ~~shares~~ of ~~its~~interest ~~Series~~expense Aand ~~common~~had ~~stock~~accrued ~~valued~~interest atbalance of $4531,~~218~~906 and to$-0- beat ~~issued~~December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These interest expenses were capitalized to ~~Rome~~the ~~Finance Investissement~~project ~~(“Rome”)~~as real estate held for ~~equity~~development and ~~debt~~sale ~~issuance~~on ~~costs.~~the ~~Rome~~consolidated isbalance asheet ~~subsidiary~~at ofDecember ~~CEG.~~31, ~~There~~2017 ~~are~~and no2016, ~~transactions~~respectively. Additionally, $11,147 ~~between~~and ~~the~~$-0- ~~Company~~of ~~and~~debt ~~Rome~~issuance costs were accreted as interest expense during the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, resulting in an remaining debt issuance costs discount balance of $187,772 at December 31, 2017.

OnColorado January 19, 2016, the Company entered into a three-year Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with SF International Consulting Limited (“SF”), to obtain the services of Slim Feriani. Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, SF or Slim Feriani shall be paid a $100,000 signing bonus, and $50,000 a month for the duration of the Consulting Agreement. In addition, SF or Slim Feriani shall receive 23,333 shares of the Company’s Series AD common stock and a five-year stock option to purchase 750,000 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock at the price of $1.50 a share. Such option will vest annually at 250,000 shares a year. In addition, SF or Slim Feriani will receive each quarter during the term of the Consulting Agreement a five-year option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common shares at a price which is 110% of the last subscription price. Each such option will vest annually in equal amounts of 83,333 shares (83,334 shares on the third anniversary). In August 2016, in connection with Slim Feriani’s resignation as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Company also canceled its options issued to SF in accordance with the terms of the Consulting Agreement. $432,750 of accrued compensation was due to SF as of December 31, 2016.Notes

30During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company received $100,000 and $-0- respectively, of cash in exchange for future issuance of its Colorado Series D notes payable to one investor. The notes are denominated in U.S Dollars, and bear interest at 8% per annum, mature after three years and are collateralized by the Company’s Colorado property.

F-34

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 87 – ~~Related~~Notes ~~Party~~and ~~Transactions~~Loans Payable (Continued)

OnDuring ~~January 19, 2016,~~ the ~~Company~~years ~~entered~~ended ~~into a~~December ~~three-year Mutual Engagement Agreement with Gulf Central Agency Assets Management Ltd. (“GCA”)~~31, ~~pursuant to which~~2017 ~~GCA~~and ~~will~~2016, ~~provide~~ the Company ~~with~~incurred ~~advice on a non-exclusive basis on securing financing of ROI’s foreign real estate ventures. GCA will be paid GBP 25~~$3,000 ~~per~~and ~~month~~$-0-, ~~payable quarterly~~respectively, ~~and~~of ainterest ~~success~~expense ~~fee~~and ~~equal~~had toaccrued 4%interest ofbalance ~~the principal amount~~ of ~~any~~$2,000 ~~investments~~at ~~which~~December ~~GCA~~31, ~~arranges with foreign investors~~2017. ~~The~~These ~~Company’s~~interest ~~former~~expenses ~~Chief~~were ~~Financial~~capitalized ~~Officer,~~to ~~Slim Feriani, is~~ the ~~Chairman~~project ~~of GCA.~~as Inreal ~~August~~estate ~~2016,~~held infor ~~connection~~development ~~with~~and ~~Slim~~sale ~~Feriani’s~~on ~~resignation as~~ the ~~Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Company~~ ~~also~~consolidated ~~canceled~~balance ~~its~~sheet ~~agreement~~at ~~with GCA. The Company incurred $305,339 of consulting fees to GCA during the year ended~~ December 31, ~~2016~~ of2017 ~~which~~and ~~$121~~2016,~~615~~ ~~was outstanding as of December 31, 2016~~respectively.

~~Note~~Dubai 9Series –A ~~Stockholders’ Equity~~Notes

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company received $500,000 and $-0- respectively, of cash in exchange for future issuance of its Dubai Series A notes payable to one investor. The notes are denominated in U.S Dollars, and bear interest at 8% per annum, mature after three years and are collateralized by the Company’s Dubai Swarovski Tower property.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $10,000 and $-0-, respectively, of interest expense and had accrued interest balance of $10,000 at December 31, 2017.

Dubai Series C Notes

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company received $2,340,000 (EUR 2,000,000) and $-0- respectively, of cash in exchange for future issuance of its Dubai Series C notes payable to one investor. The notes are denominated in Euros, and bear interest at 7% per annum, mature after three years and are collateralized by the Company’s Dubai Swarovski Tower property. $185,182 and $-0- of debt issuance costs were outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $19,009 and $-0-, respectively, of interest expense and had accrued interest balance of $19,009 at December 31, 2017. Additionally, $6,476 and $-0- of debt issuance costs were accreted as interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Terrace Series B Notes

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company received $175,000 and $-0-, in cash in exchange for future issuance of its Terrace Series B notes payable to a total of fifteen investors. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum, are due April 30, 2019, and are collateralized by a secured interest in the Terrace property. The Series B notes contain an option by the Company to prepay the notes on a pro rata basis in the event of sales of the Terrace project in an amount equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the net profits realized on such sales. $43,864 and $46,119 of debt issuance costs were outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $138,199 and $-0-, respectively, of interest expense and had accrued interest balance of $32,331 at December 31, 2017. Additionally, $58,981 and $-0- of debt issuance costs were accreted as interest expense during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities (VIE)

A VIE is an entity that has one of three characteristics: (1) it is controlled by someone other than its shareowners or partners, (2) its shareowners or partners are not economically exposed to the entity’s earnings (for example, they are protected against losses), or (3) it was thinly capitalized when it was formed.

The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary ROI DEV, acts as general partner and manager to a French-registered limited partnership under the name ROI Land Colorado et New York Soho (“ROI SCA”). ROI SCA is determined to be a VIE and the Company is required to consolidate the accounts of ROI SCA even though it has no shares in the limited partnership by shares since the general partner cannot be easily removed from the limited partnership and is entitled to 70% of net earnings of ROI SCA. Under the limited partnership agreement, ROI DEV, as the general partner, is also required to redeem the shares held by the limited partners, upon their requests, at a value above their initial purchase price (EUR 12.66) starting from the third year.

F-35

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities (VIE) (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company initially recognized $1,734,750 of non-controllable interest in consolidated entity which, given the put option, was adjusted to the greater of (a) $1,737,393, the initial non-controllable interest balance adjusted for the proportionate share of equity in the limited partnership or (b) $2,364,224, the maximum redemption price of the shares to be redeemed by the general partner. Accordingly, $461,444 of redemption value adjustment was recorded as an adjustment to accumulated deficit on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.

Note 9 – Related Party Transactions

On May 18, 2017, the Company entered into a Termination, General Release and Settlement Agreement with Sami Chaouch, the Company’s former Chairman and CEO (resigned May 18, 2017), whereby the Company releases Mr. Chaouch from all outstanding claims from and obligations to the Company upon satisfaction of the following conditions: a) immediate termination from all agreements (except for a life insurance policy in favor of Mr. Chaouch) between the Company, including the resignation from his positions as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and b) return and cancellation of all Series A preferred stock (100,000 shares) owned by Mr. Chaouch. This agreement also entitles Mr. Chaouch to receive 1,000,000 shares of Series B preferred stock, valued at $1.00 per share, upon signing and to remain as beneficiary for a corporate life insurance policy in favor of Mr. Chaouch. As a result of this agreement, the Company accounted for an expense of $1,000,000 as consulting fees and derecognized all outstanding receivables and payables between Mr. Chaouch and recorded a settlement gain of $78,393 during the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company made compensation of $20,000 and advance payments of $26,607 to Mr. Chaouch for business related expenses.

The Company leased a corporate apartment for Sebastien Cliche, the Company’s former President (resigned October 3, 2017), a month-to-month basis, which was cancelled on March 31, 2016. Monthly rental was $1,906 and total rent paid for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $-0- and $5,719, respectively. During fiscal year 2017, the Company incurred consulting fees of $225,000 to Mr. Cliche of which $181,494 remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017.

During the years ended December 31, 2016, the Company leased a corporate apartment for Philippe Germain on a month-to-month basis. Monthly rental was $675 and total rent paid for the years ended December 31, 2016 was $2,080. This lease was cancelled on March 31, 2016. The Company also had $57,541 of accrued expenses due to Philippe Germain as of December 31, 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company entered into two loan agreements with Philippe Germain totaling $103,488. The loans are unsecured, due in ninety days and bear interest at 8% per annum. $35,760 of the loan was repaid resulting in a principal balance of $67,705 and accrued interest of $5,493 as of December 31, 2017. The funds were used for the Company’s general working capital purpose.

The Company leases a corporate apartment from Louise Gagner on a month-to-month basis. Ms. Gagner is the mother of Philippe Germain. Monthly rental is $1,000 and total rent paid for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $3,000. This lease was cancelled as of March 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into multiple loan agreements with LMM Group Ltd. (“LMM”), a Swiss company, and received a total of $248,168. The loans are unsecured, bear interest at 8% per annum and are due at various dates beginning January 1, 2016. On December 10, 2015, $150,000 of the notes was assigned from LMM to 8010609 Canada Inc. The balance of the loans from LMM as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 is $62,488 and $62,488, respectively, and the balance of accrued interest is $15,607 and $11,445, respectively. Philippe Germain is the sole shareholder of LMM.

F-36

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 9 – Related Party Transactions (Continued)

On October 29, 2015, 8010609 Canada Inc. loaned the Company $36,475 which was repaid on November 20, 2015. Additionally, on December 10, 2015, the $150,000 note held by LMM was assigned to 8010609 Canada Inc. On the same date, the Company repaid $50,000 of the note. The notes are unsecured, bear interest at 8% per annum and are due on December 30, 2017. The balance of the loans from 8010609 Canada Inc. as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 is $100,000 and $100,000, respectively, and interest was accrued on the loans for $16,778 and $8,667, respectively. The Company also incurred $-0- and $50,000 of consulting fees to 8010609 Canada Inc. during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $14,859 remains outstanding at December 31, 2017. Philippe Germain is also the sole shareholder of 8010609 Canada Inc.

On October 13, 2015, the Company assumed a second mortgage note due to 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. of $288,360 (CAD 400,000). 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. and the owner of 9202 4462 Quebec Inc. are shareholders of the Company. The loan is secured by a second rank mortgage on a property owned by CTC, bears interest at 6% per annum and was due April 13, 2016. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the principal balance of the loan was $318,636 and $297,040, respectively, and accrued interest was $14,339 and $12,020, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, interest expense of $19,131 and $14,443, respectively, was recorded. As of December 31, 2017, the note is in default but the Company is currently in negotiation with the note holder for an extension.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $66,574 and $67,212, respectively, to Maxim Cliche, the brother of Sebastien Cliche, for consulting services.

During fiscal year 2016, the Company entered into two loan agreements with Louise Gagner totaling $87,130. Ms. Gagner is the mother of Philippe Germain. The loans are unsecured, due in ninety days and bear no interest. The loans were repaid in full during the year ended December 31, 2017. The funds were used for the Company’s general working capital purpose.

The Company incurred $700,000 (including $100,000 for the 100,000 Series A preferred shares issued on May 18, 2017 valued at $1.00 per share) for annual compensation to Martin Scholz during fiscal years 2017 (2016: $600,000), of which $694,739 of accrued compensation and expenses were outstanding as of December 31, 2017.

On September 10, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 14,400 shares of Capital Evolution Groupe SAS (“CEG”), a French limited liability company, for $112,187 (EUR 100,000). The Company’s Co-President, Philippe Germain, is a shareholder of CEG. As of December 31, 2015, $112,187 was paid for the investment and was classified as an acquisition deposit in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position. On April 5, 2016, the Company agreed to acquire an additional 144,459 shares of CEG for $1,575,686 (EUR 1,444,590) from Philippe Germain, subject to completion of due diligence by the Company and official registration of the shares in France. The shares to be acquired will bring the Company’s interest in CEG to 58% once the transaction was consummated. On April 5, 2016, the total consideration for the shares was adjusted to $551,490 (EUR 505,607) by mutual agreement between the parties. During the year ended December 2016, the Company and the shareholders of CEG agreed to rescind the share purchase agreement, to reverse all past investments, expenditures and payables related to CEG and to reimburse the Company for the net balance of $21,038. The Company recorded a net loss from investment in CEG of $164,952 during the year ended December 31, 2016 and classified the amount to be reimbursed to the Company as advances to related party in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

During fiscal year 2017, the Company continues to engage CEG and its subsidiary Acadian Advisors and Associates (“Acadian”) with its fund raising efforts and made advance commission payments to CEG and Acadian totaling $1,463,340 of which $1,230,197 was recorded as debt and equity issuance costs. $1,038,197 of these debt and equity issuance costs were capitalized to the corresponding notes payable and equity. The remaining balance of $301,998 was recorded as advance expenses to related party on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. Management believes that such amount is recoverable and that no provision is necessary. The Company also incurred and paid business related expenses of $82,000 to Acadian.

F-37

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 9 – Related Party Transactions (Continued)

On January 19, 2016, the Company entered into a three-year Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with SF International Consulting Limited (“SF”), to obtain the services of Slim Feriani, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer. SF International Consulting Limited is an entity controlled by Slim Feriani. Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, SF or Slim Feriani shall be paid a $100,000 signing bonus, and $50,000 a month for the duration of the Consulting Agreement. In addition, SF or Slim Feriani shall receive 23,333 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock and a five-year stock option to purchase 750,000 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock at the price of $1.50 a share. Such option will vest annually at 250,000 shares a year. In addition, SF or Slim Feriani will receive each quarter during the term of the Consulting Agreement a five-year option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common shares at a price which is 110% of the last subscription price. Each such option will vest annually in equal amounts of 83,333 shares (83,334 shares on the third anniversary). $432,750 of accrued compensation was due to SF as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. In August 2016, in connection with Slim Feriani’s resignation as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Company also canceled its options issued to SF in accordance with the terms of the Consulting Agreement.

On January 19, 2016, the Company entered into a three-year Mutual Engagement Agreement with Gulf Central Agency Assets Management Ltd. (“GCA”), pursuant to which GCA will provide the Company with advice on a non-exclusive basis on securing financing of ROI’s foreign real estate ventures. GCA will be paid GBP 25,000 per month, payable quarterly, and a success fee equal to 4% of the principal amount of any investments which GCA arranges with foreign investors. The Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, Slim Feriani, is the Chairman of GCA. In August 2016, in connection with Slim Feriani’s resignation as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, the Company also canceled its agreement with GCA. $234,105 of consulting fees remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

In February 2016, the Company received a total of $1,500,000 from Alternative Strategy Partners Pte. Ltd., a Singapore limited company (“ASP”), in connection with the Company’s Dubai Sobha Hartland Acquisition and Development Project (“Sobha Dubai Project”). Pursuant to an agreement between the parties dated February 24, 2016, the Company agreed to issue to ASP certain notes (“ASP notes”) which shall have a two year maturity, bear interest at 8% per annum payable quarterly and have a mortgage on the First Plot of the Sobha Dubai Project, subordinated to loans from banks or other institutional lenders, if such a lien is determined to be valid and enforceable under Dubai law, otherwise, the notes shall be secured by a lien, similarly subordinated, upon all of the stock of the ROI Land Investments Ltd., the beneficial owner of the Sobha Dubai Project. The ASP notes also contain an option either to convert all or part of its notes to the Company’s Series A common stock at $1.00 per share or to redeem all or part of its investment. Additionally, the ASP notes allowed ASP to receive certain profit participation of up to 50% of the net profits upon sale of the First Plot. On May 15, 2016, the Company received a termination letter from PNC terminating the agreement dated February 7, 2016 for non-payment of the amounts due under the agreement. As a result, the Company forfeited the deposits paid to PNC and defaulted on the ASP notes. The Company is currently in discussions with ASP to amend the terms of the notes. $399,219 and $279,219 of accrued interest and fees remain outstanding on the notes as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. On August 2, 2017, the Company also entered into a loan agreement with ASP which allows the Company to draw up to $300,000 at a 6% annual interest maturing on February 1, 2018. The loan balance as of December 31, 2017 was $200,000 and accrued interest of $3,468 was outstanding. ASP is an entity owned by Yuhi Horiguchi, the Company’s CFO. During fiscal years 2017, total compensation paid to Mr. Horiguchi was $40,000.

F-38

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 9 – Related Party Transactions (Continued)

Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity

Authorized Capital

On November 12, 2015, the Company filed an amendment to its articles of incorporation to increase its authorized capital to 160,000,000 authorized shares of Series A Common Stock at $0.0001 par value, 40,000,000 authorized shares of Series B Common Stock at $0.0001 par value, and 50,000,000 authorized shares of Preferred Stock at par value of $0.0001 per share. Series A common stock has equal voting rights, is non-assessable and has one vote per share while Series B common stock has no voting rights. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the directors of the Company.

Preferred Stock

Series A Preferred Stock

On May 9, 2016, the Company issued 100,000 shares each of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, to two directors, in exchange for their 100,000 shares each of the Company’s Series A common stock. No additional consideration was provided to the Company for the Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock is identical to the common stock of the Company, except that each share of the 200,000 Series A Preferred Stock has 150 votes per share instead of the one vote per share of the Series A Common Stock.

On May 18, 2017, the Company cancelled 100,000 shares of the Series A preferred stock held by Sami Chaouch upon his resignation as Director and Chief Executive Officer and his surrender of said shares. On October 3, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the re-issuance of the 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to Martin Scholz, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for services rendered.

F-39

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 10 – Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

Series B Preferred Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued to 14 accredited investors a total of 2,239,226 shares of a class of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) against receipt from them of 1,889,226 shares of the Company’s common stock held by them, plus $377,999 in cash. The Series B Preferred Stock is identical to the Series A common stock of ROI, except that each share of the Series B Preferred Stock has the following features:

(1) The Series B Preferred Shares shall not be convertible into the Company’s common stock unless and until (i) a class of the Company's capital stock commences trading upon the U.S. NASDAQ trading system (the "NASDAQ Uplisting"), or (ii) the Company notifies the holders of the Series B Preferred Shares that their shares may be converted into common stock (whether or not the NASDAQ Uplisting has then yet occurred); after which time the Series B Preferred Shares shall be convertible as and to the extent set forth below.

(2) When any shares of Series B Preferred Shares are converted into common stock, they shall be converted at the rate of three (3) shares of common stock for the "Effective Value" (defined below) of each of the Series B Preferred Shares.

(3) The Series B Preferred Shares shall accumulate dividends at the rate of 8% per annum, prorated for partial years, such that, at the time of its conversion, every share of Series B Preferred Shares shall convert at a rate (the "Effective Value") computed by adding to it the cumulative value of its accumulated dividends. For example, if ten shares of the Series B Preferred Shares have been held for two years and six months, when they are converted into common stock they each will have an Effective Value of 1.20 shares, and collectively an Effective Value of 12 shares. Since each share of Series B Preferred Shares converts into three shares of common stock, all ten shares will convert into 36 shares of common stock. Upon conversion, no fractional shares of common stock shall be issued, but rather fractional common stock shares shall be settled in cash.

(4) If the purchaser of Series B Preferred Shares is an existing holder of the common stock, then the Company may at its discretion extend to any such purchaser the option to pay for some or all of the purchase price of the Series B Preferred Shares by means of submitting to the Company to be held in treasury some of such holder's shares of common stock, at a valuation to be determined by the Company's Board of Directors in their sole but reasonable discretion.

F-31

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2016 and 2015

Note 9 – Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

The cash received from the sale of the Series B Preferred Stock will be used for working capital purposes and the Company’s common stock received will be held in treasury and used for future option exercises or upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

~~For~~During the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company received afrom ~~total~~9 accredited investors 1,008,930 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock held by them plus $~~573~~219,~~915~~768 in ~~deposits~~cash ~~from~~in ~~investors~~exchange ~~which~~for ~~shall~~the befuture ~~exchanged~~issuance ~~for~~of a total of 1,~~129~~008,~~556~~930 shares of ~~Series~~a Bclass of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 toper beshare ~~newly~~(the ~~issued~~“Series B Preferred Stock”). ~~These~~During ~~shares~~the ~~were~~year ~~not~~ended ~~yet~~December ~~issued~~31, by2016, the Company asissued to 14 accredited investors a total of ~~December~~1,889,226 31shares of Series B Preferred Stock against receipt from them of 1,889,226 ~~2016~~shares of the Company’s Series A common stock held by them, plus $377,999 in cash.

During the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company ~~issued~~received ~~350,000~~a ~~shares~~total of ~~Series~~$1,542,000 Band ~~preferred~~$573,915, ~~stock~~respectively, toin andeposits ~~investor~~from ~~for~~investors ~~debt~~which ~~issuance~~shall ~~costs.~~be ~~The~~exchanged for 1,542,000 shares ~~issued~~and ~~were~~1,129,556 ~~valued at~~shares, anrespectively, ~~average~~of ~~price~~Series ofB ~~$0.55,~~preferred ~~based~~stock onto ~~the~~be ~~price~~newly ofissued. These shares ~~sold~~were tonot yet ~~investors,~~issued ~~for~~by athe ~~total~~Company as of ~~$94~~December 31,~~500~~ 2017.

~~Common~~On ~~Stock~~May 18, 2017, in connection with the Company’s settlement agreement with Sami Chaouch, the Company agreed to issue 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series B preferred stock, however, the Company has not yet issued these shares as of December 31, 2017. These shares were valued at an average price of $1.00 per share, based on the price of shares sold to investors, for a total of $1,000,000, accounted for as consulting fees.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received cash, net of cash issuance costs, of $4,050,238, for 5,280,381 shares of its Series A common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company received cash of $7,666,949, net of cash issuance costs, for 7,393,580 shares of its Series A common stock.F-40

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 43,333 shares of Series A common stock for consulting services from certain individuals and entities. The shares were valued at an average price of $1.27, for a total of $54,947 and have been charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 2,186,745 shares of Series A common stock for consulting services from certain individuals and entities. The fair value of the services provided by consultants is not reliably estimable as these services are traditionally transacted based on a percentage of transaction volume, making measurement of such services impractical. The shares were valued at an average price of $0.75, for a total of $1,648,878 and have been charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company also issued 1,224,242 shares of Series A common stock, valued at an average price of $0.35, to consultants for accrued consulting services at December 31, 2014.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 121,961 shares of Series A common stock in conversion of $150,000 of notes payable. The shares were valued at $1.23, based on the fair market value of shares on the date of the conversion.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid cash of $203,208 for equity issuance costs. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 527,006 shares of Series A common stock for commissions to multiple parties for equity issuance costs. The shares issued were valued at an average price of $0.74, for a total of $392,254. In addition, the Company paid cash of $253,351 for issuance costs, for a total of $645,605, which has been charged to additional paid-in capital as of December 31, 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 164,605 shares of Series A common stock for commissions to consultants for debt issuance costs. The fair value of the services provided by consultants is not reliably estimable as these services are traditionally transacted based on a percentage of transaction volume, making measurement of such services impractical. The shares issued were valued at an average price of $1.23, for a total of $203,240.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, 2,089,226 shares of Series A common stock were received by the Company to be held in treasury. These shares held in treasury will be used for future option exercises or for future conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company cancelled 500,000 shares of Series A common stock previously issued to a consultant for non-performance by the consultant under the consulting agreement.

F-32

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 910 – Stockholders’ ~~Equity~~ Equity (Continued)

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company paid cash of $225,957 and $-0-, respectively, for equity issuance costs related to Series B preferred stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 16,000 shares and 350,000 shares, respectively, of Series B preferred stock to an investor for debt issuance costs. The shares issued were valued at an average price of $1.00 and $0.55, respectively, based on the price of shares sold to investors, for a total of $16,000 and $94,500, respectively.

Common Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not receive any cash for issuance of Series A common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received cash, net of cash issuance costs, of $4,050,238, for 5,280,381 shares of its Series A common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company agreed to issue a total of 3,702,953 shares of Series A common stock in conversion of $50,000 of Beauport Series B convertible notes at $0.0495 per share and $250,000 of Beauport Series C convertible notes at $0.0928 per share. These shares have not been issued by the Company as of December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 121,961 shares of Series A common stock in conversion of $150,000 of performance-linked notes payable at $1.2299 per share.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company paid cash of $-0- and $203,208, respectively, for equity issuance costs related to Series A common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, 2,420,594 shares and 2,089,226 shares, respectively, of Series A common stock were received by the Company to be held in treasury. These shares held in treasury will be used for future option exercises or for future conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

Failure-to-File Cease Trade Order in Canada

On September 7, 2016, the Company’s ~~common~~ common shares were placed on a “failure-to-file cease trade order (FTFCTO)” in Canada by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (“AMF”), the market regulatory authority in the province of Quebec, for failure to file its consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis for the interim fiscal periods ended June 30, 2016, September 30, 2016, March 31, 2017, June 30, 2017, September 30, 2017, March 31, 2018 and June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and its annual consolidated financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis and annual information form for the fiscal ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 in Canada within the time required by applicable securities laws. Once these filings have been completed, the Company expects to apply for a revocation of the FTFCTO and resume its status as an issuer current in its reporting obligations in Canada. On March 22, 2018, the Company completed its annual filing requirements for the year ended December 31, 2016 and on July 17, 2018, the Company completed its quarterly filing requirements for the second and third quarters of 2016.

Administrative Proceeding by the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission

2015 Equity Incentive Plan

On September 8, 2015, the Company’s ~~board~~ board of directors approved and adopted the ROI Land Investments Ltd. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The 2015 Plan was approved by a majority of stockholders of the Company on November 9, 2015. The 2015 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non- qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted awards, performance share awards and performance compensation awards. ~~The~~There ~~following~~were ~~summarizes~~no ~~activity~~activities ~~under~~during the ~~2015~~years ~~Plan~~ended ~~for~~December 31, 2017 and 2016 and no awards are outstanding under the ~~year~~2015 ~~ended~~Plan at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015:~~2016.

Shares approved for issuance at plan inception	20,000,000
Options granted in 2015	(695,000	)
Options cancelled in 2015	695,000
Balance as of December 31, 2015	20,000,000
Options granted in 2016	–
Options cancelled in 2016	–
Balance as of December 31, 2016	20,000,000

F-41

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued options to purchase a total of 695,000 shares of the Company’s Series A common stock to four employees. The options were cancelled on November 16, 2015 as the related employment agreements were cancelled. The options vested immediately, had contractual lives of three years and were valued at an average grant date fair value of $0.14 per option, or $97,300, using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

Expected term	1.5 years
Expected volatility	17.5%
Risk-free interest rate	0.92% - 1.06%
Dividend yield	0.00

The stock price was based on the price of shares sold to investors and volatility was based on comparable volatility of other companies since the Company had no significant historical volatility. For the year ended December 31, 2015, $97,300 was recorded as compensation expense. There were no activities during the year ended December 31, 2016.

F-33

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 910 – Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

Non Plan ~~Options~~

During the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~ 2016, the Company issued certain stock options to purchase the Company’s Series A common stock, outside of the 2015 Plan. The following summarizes non-Plan option activity for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016:

	Common Stock Options Outstanding									Weighted average
	Employees			Non-employees			Total			exercise price
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014		–			–			–		$	–
Options granted		500,000			6,457,250			6,957,250		$	1.51
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015		500,000			6,457,250			6,957,250		$	1.51
Options granted		50,000			5,633,259			5,~~633~~683,259		$	1.58
Cancelled or expired		–			(2,522,250	)		(2,522,250	)	$	1.56
Balance as of December 31, 2016		550,000			9,568,259			10,118,259		$	1.54
Options granted		–			–			–		$	–
Cancelled or expired		(500,000	)		(3,175,000	)		(3,675,000	)	$	1.47
Balance as of December 31, 2017		50,000			6,393,259			6,443,259		$	1.59

The following table summarizes ~~information~~ information with respect to stock options outstanding and exercisable by employees and directors as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016:

				Options outstanding						Options vested and exercisable
Exercise price		Number outstanding		Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)		Weighted average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value		Number vested		Weighted average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value
As of December 31, 2017
$	1.50		50,000		1.12	$	1.50		–		50,000	$	1.50		–
As of December 31, 2016
$	0.35		500,000		0.75	$	0.35	$	252,500		500,000	$	0.35	$	252,500
$	1.50		50,000		2.12	$	1.50		–		50,000	$	1.50		–
			550,000		0.87	$	0.45	$	252,500		550,000	$	0.45	$	252,500
As of December 31, 2015
$	0.35		500,000		1.75	$	0.35	$	575,000		350,000	$	0.35	$	402,500

During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company issued stock options to its employees to purchase a total of 50,000 shares and 500,000 shares, respectively. These options have contractual lives of three years and were valued at an average grant date fair value of $0.76 and $0.04 per option, respectively, using the BlackF-~~Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions:~~42

	For the year ended December 31,
	2016	2015
Stock Price	$1.35	$0.35
Expected term	3.00 years	2.25 years
Expected volatility	92.2%	17.5%
Risk-free interest rate	1.20%	1.00%
Dividend yield	0.00	0.00

F-34

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 910 – Stockholders’ ~~Equity~~ Equity (Continued)

~~For~~During the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the ~~stock price~~Company ~~was~~did ~~based~~not onissue ~~the~~any ~~most recent traded~~ stock ~~price~~options asto ofits ~~the grant date and volatility was based on the Company’s historical volatility~~employees. ~~For~~During the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the Company issued stock options ~~price~~to ~~was~~its ~~based~~employees onto ~~the~~purchase ~~price~~a total of 50,000 shares. ~~sold~~These tooptions ~~investors~~have contractual lives of three years and ~~volatility~~were valued ~~was~~at ~~based~~an onaverage ~~comparable~~grant ~~volatility~~date fair value of ~~other~~$0.76 ~~companies~~per ~~since~~option, respectively, using the ~~Company~~Black-Scholes ~~had~~Option noPricing ~~significant~~Model ~~historical~~with ~~volatility.~~the following assumptions:

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, $39,090 and $17,754, respectively, were recorded as compensation expense and $-0- and $2,246, respectively, related to unrecognized stock compensation costs. The Company expects to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of 0.4 years as of December 31, 2015.

	For the year ended December 31,
	2017		2016
Stock Price		–	$	1.35
Expected term		–		3.00 years
Expected volatility		–		92.2%
Risk-free interest rate		–		1.20%
Dividend yield		–		0.00

~~The~~Stock ~~following~~prices ~~table~~were ~~summarizes~~based ~~information with~~on ~~respect~~the tomost recent traded stock ~~options~~price ~~outstanding~~as ~~and~~of ~~exercisable~~the bygrant ~~non-employees~~date asand ofvolatility ~~December~~was ~~31,~~based ~~2016~~on ~~and~~the ~~2015:~~Company’s historical volatility.

				Options outstanding						Options vested and exercisable
Exercise price		Number outstanding		Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)		Weighted average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value		Number vested		Weighted average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value
As of December 31, 2016
$	0.35		25,000		0.75	$	0.35	$	12,625		25,000	$	0.35	$	12,625
$	0.75		300,000		3.17	$	0.75	$	31,500		140,000	$	0.75	$	14,700
$	1.50		1,148,259		0.91	$	1.50	$	–		1,048,259	$	1.50	$	–
$	1.65		8,095,000		7.18	$	1.65	$	–		2,535,000	$	1.65	$	–
			9,568,259		6.29	$	1.60	$	44,125		3,748,259	$	1.57	$	27,325
As of December 31, 2015
$	0.35		25,000		1.75	$	0.35	$	28,750		25,000	$	0.35	$	28,750
$	0.75		300,000		4.17	$	0.75	$	225,000		60,000	$	0.75	$	45,000
$	1.50		122,250		0.48	$	1.50	$	–		122,250	$	1.50	$	–
$	1.65		6,010,000		9.86	$	1.65	$	–		–	$	1.65	$	–
			6,457,250		9.83	$	1.60	$	253,750		207,250	$	1.14	$	73,750

A total of 500,000 options and -0- options were either expired or canceled during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

~~During~~For the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, ~~the~~$-0- ~~Company issued options to purchase a total of 5,633,259 shares~~ and 6$39,~~457~~090,~~250~~ ~~shares,~~ respectively, ofwere ~~Series~~recorded ~~A common stock to various consultants and investors. The fair value of the services provided by consultants is not reliably estimable~~ as ~~these~~ ~~services~~compensation ~~are~~expense ~~traditionally transacted based on a percentage of transaction volume, making measurement of such services impractical. These options have contractual lives of six months to ten years~~ and ~~were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model at an weighted average grant date fair value of~~ $-0~~.46~~- ~~per option, or $2,613,018,~~ and $-0~~.44 per option~~-, ~~or $2~~respectively,~~831,530,~~ ~~for~~related ~~the~~to ~~years~~unrecognized ~~ended~~stock ~~December~~compensation ~~31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, with the following assumptions:~~costs.

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2016	2015
Stock Price	$0.06 - $1.50	$0.35 - $1.50
Expected term	0.5 to 5 years	0.5 to 10 years
Expected volatility	92.2% to 134.8%	17.3% to 21.1%
Risk-free interest rate	1.20%	0.64% to 2.36%
Dividend yield	0.00	0.00

The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding and exercisable by non-employees as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

F-35

				Options outstanding						Options vested and exercisable
Exercise price		Number outstanding		Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)		Weighted average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value		Number vested		Weighted average exercise price		Aggregate intrinsic value

As of December 31, 2017
$	0.75		300,000		2.17	$	0.75	$	–		220,000	$	0.75	$	–
$	1.50		1,198,259		0.51	$	1.50	$	–		1,148,259	$	1.50	$	–
$	1.65		4,895,000		4.99	$	1.65	$	–		3,365,000	$	1.65	$	–
			6,393,259		4.02	$	1.58	$	–		4,733,259	$	1.58	$	–

As of December 31, 2016
$	0.35		25,000		0.75	$	0.35	$	12,625		25,000	$	0.35	$	12,625
$	0.75		300,000		3.17	$	0.75	$	31,500		140,000	$	0.75	$	14,700
$	1.50		1,148,259		0.91	$	1.50	$	–		1,048,259	$	1.50	$	–
$	1.65		8,095,000		7.18	$	1.65	$	–		2,535,000	$	1.65	$	–
			9,568,259		6.29	$	1.60	$	44,125		3,748,259	$	1.57	$	27,325

F-43

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 910 – Stockholders’ ~~Equity~~ Equity (Continued)

ADuring the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not issue any stock options to non-employees. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued options to purchase a total of 25,~~522~~633,~~250~~259 shares, of Series A common stock to various consultants and investors. The fair value of the services provided by consultants is not reliably estimable as these services are traditionally transacted based on a percentage of transaction volume, making measurement of such services impractical. These options ~~were~~have ~~either~~contractual ~~expired~~lives of six months to ten years and were orvalued ~~canceled~~using ~~during~~the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model at an weighted average grant date fair value of $0.46 per option, or $2,613,018, for the year ended December 31, 2016. with the following assumptions:

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the stock price was based on the most recent traded stock price as of the grant date and volatility was based on the Company’s historical volatility. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the stock price was based on the price of shares sold to investors and volatility was based on comparable volatility of other companies since the Company had no significant historical volatility.

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2017		2016
Stock Price		–		$0.06 - $1.50
Expected term		–		0.5 to 5 years
Expected volatility		–		92.2% to 134.8%
Risk-free interest rate		–		1.20%
Dividend yield		–		0.00

~~For~~Stock ~~the~~prices ~~years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, $2,243,195 and $193,256, respectively,~~ were ~~recorded~~based inon ~~consulting~~the ~~fee~~most ~~expense and $1,516,476 and $2,637,624, respectively, were~~recent ~~related~~traded ~~to unrecognized~~ stock ~~compensation~~price ~~costs.~~as ~~The~~of ~~Company~~the ~~expects~~grant todate ~~recognize those costs over a weighted average period of 2.1 years~~ and ~~2.8~~volatility ~~years~~was asbased ofon ~~December~~the ~~31,~~Company’s ~~2016~~historical ~~and 2015, respectively~~volatility.

~~Warrants~~A total of 3,175,000 options and 2,522,250 options were either expired or canceled during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

~~During~~For the ~~year~~years ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2017 ~~the~~and ~~Company~~2016, ~~issued~~$(55,399) ~~warrants~~and ~~to purchase a total of 1~~$2,~~325~~243,~~000~~195, ~~shares~~respectively, ofwere ~~the~~recorded ~~Company’s~~in ~~Series~~consulting Afee ~~common~~expense ~~stock~~and at$255,875 ~~exercise~~and ~~prices ranging from~~ $~~0.35~~1,516,476, torespectively, were ~~$0.75~~related to ~~four~~unrecognized ~~individuals~~stock ~~for~~compensation ~~consulting services~~costs. ~~$477,250~~The ~~was~~Company ~~charged~~expects to ~~consulting~~recognize ~~fee~~those ~~expense~~costs ~~for~~over ~~the year~~a ~~ended~~weighted ~~December~~average ~~31,~~period of ~~2015~~1.5 Onyears ~~September~~and ~~30,~~2.1 ~~2015,~~years ~~all~~as of ~~the~~December ~~warrants~~31, ~~were~~2017 ~~cancelled~~and ~~by mutual agreement between the parties. Accordingly~~2016, ~~no future expense will be recognized~~respectively.

Note 1011 – Income Taxes

The income tax expense (benefit) differs from the amount computed by applying the United States Statutory corporate income tax rate as follows:

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015
	2017		2016
United States statutory corporate income tax rate		34.0%		34.0%
Effect of Canadian income tax rates		0.8%		-2.2%
Effect of foreign income tax differences		-2.4%		0.8%
Permanent differences		0.0%		0.1%
Change in valuation allowance		-34.8%		-31.9%
Enactment of change in United States tax rate		-55.4%		–
Change in valuation allowance		23.8%		-34.8%
Provision for income tax		-%		-%

Deferred income taxes reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes. The components of the net deferred income tax assets are approximately as follows:F-44

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 11 – Income Taxes (Continued)

Deferred income tax assets:

	December 31,
	2016			2015
	2017			2016
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	108,~~336~~565,~~800~~494		$	410,~~827~~336,~~780~~800
Stock based compensation		1880,~~444,660~~656			~~668~~1,~~600~~444,660
Valuation allowance		(119,~~781~~446,~~460~~150	)		(511,~~496~~781,~~380~~460	)
Net deferred income tax assets	$	–		$	–

The Company has established a full valuation allowance on its deferred tax asset because of a lack of sufficient positive evidence to support its realization. The valuation allowance ~~increased~~decreased by $62,~~285~~335,~~080~~310 and increased by $36,~~726~~285,~~200~~080 for the years ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, respectively. The decrease in fiscal year 2017 is explained by the reduction of the deferred tax asset on United States tax attributes due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company has ~~net~~ net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $2532,~~552~~040,000 in the United States, which expire commencing 2033. The potential ~~tax~~ tax benefit of these losses may be limited due to certain change in ownership provisions under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRS”) and similar state provisions. The Company also has a net operating loss carry forward in Canada of approximately $58,~~869~~847,000 (CAD 711,~~773~~106,000) which ~~expire~~expires commencing 2034, asin ~~well~~Germany asof $70,000 (EUR 83,000) with no expiration and in Luxembourg of $~~358~~535,000 (EUR ~~306~~447,000) which expires in 2033.

~~F-36~~IRS Section 382 places limitations (the “Section 382 Limitation”) on the amount of taxable income which can be offset by net operating loss carry forwards after a change in control (generally greater than 50% change in ownership) of a loss corporation. Generally, after a change in control, a loss corporation cannot deduct operating loss carry forwards in excess of the Section 382 Limitation. Due to these “change in ownership” provisions, utilization of the net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards may be subject to an annual limitation regarding their utilization against taxable income in future periods. The Company has not concluded its analysis of Section 382 through December 31, 2017, but believes the provisions will not limit the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards to offset, prior to their expiration, future taxable income.

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S., Canada, Germany and Luxembourg. The tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to interpretation of related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. No provision was made for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 as the Company had cumulative operating losses in each of these jurisdictions.

U.S. federal income tax reform legislation, known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, was signed into law on December 22, 2017 (the “Tax Reform Bill”) which reduces, amongst other things, the corporate federal income tax rate from 34% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. In December 2017 the SEC staff issued guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Reform Bill. The guidance provides that the income tax effects of those aspects of the Tax Reform Bill for which the Company’s accounting for income taxes is complete must be reflected in the current period and allows for reporting provisional amounts during a measurement period until the evaluation is complete. The Company management believes that the tax effects of these provisions do not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017.

F-45

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 1012 – ~~Income~~Commitments ~~Taxes~~and ~~(Continued)~~Contingencies

IRS Section 382 places limitations (the “Section 382 Limitation”) on the amount of taxable income which can be offset by net operating loss carry forwards after a change in control (generally greater than 50% change in ownership) of a loss corporation. Generally, after a change in control, a loss corporation cannot deduct operating loss carry forwards in excess of the Section 382 Limitation. Due to these “change in ownership” provisions, utilization of the net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards may be subject to an annual limitation regarding their utilization against taxable income in future periods. The Company has not concluded its analysis of Section 382 through December 31, 2016, but believes the provisions will not limit the availability of losses to offset future income.

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S., Canada and Luxembourg. The tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to interpretation of related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. No provision was made for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 as the Company had cumulative operating losses in each of these jurisdictions.

Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies

The Company has entered into certain consulting agreements which call for introduction fees to be paid to the consultants for capital received by the Company from investors introduced by the consultants. The fees range from i) 2% in Series A common stock to ii) 13% in cash and 10% in Series A common stock of the amounts received by the Company.

On March 11, 2015, the Company entered ~~into~~ into an agreement with Artizan Interior design (“Artizan”), a UAE corporation, whereby Artizan will provide project ~~management~~ management and technical coordination services for its project in the Sobha Hartland district of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The services of Artizan began October 1, 2015 at a monthly fee of $85,000 for a term of the development stage of the project until the handover of the project to the developer. On March 2, 2016, the Company entered into a Client Representative Consultancy Agreement ~~with~~ with Artizan, whereby Artizan will provide construction and engineering design services for its project in the Sobha Hartland ~~district~~ district of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The services of Artizan began in March 2016 for a total fee of $1,200,000 in payments of 50% upon the commencement of work, 25% upon the approval of the design package from relevant authorities, and 25% upon the completion of all design services as agreed and approved by the Company. Upon receipt of a termination letter from PNC terminating the agreement related to the Sobha Hartland, Dubai project, the Company terminated its agreement between Artizan and $127,500 of payables is due to Aritizan as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. On May 14, 2018, the Company and Artizan entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Company shall pay to Artizan a total of $150,000, including late fees, in two equal payments of $75,000 on May 15, 2018 and July 15, 2018, as full and final settlement for its outstanding payables. These payments were satisfied in full by the Company.

On February 7, 2016, the Company entered ~~into~~ into a Development Sale and Purchase Agreement with PNC. During ~~the~~fiscal year ~~ended December 31,~~ 2016, the Company made an additional payment of $1,900,000 (AED 6,980,144) in non-refundable deposits to PNC leaving a balance of $24,786,795 (AED 91,014,801). On May 15, 2016, the Company received a termination letter from PNC terminating the agreement dated February 7, 2016 for non-payment of the amounts due under the agreement. As a result, the Company forfeited the $4,701,205 (AED 17,271,099) of deposits. A total of $5,048,032 (AED 18,545,258), including $346,827 (AED 1,273,583) of closing and development costs, has been charged to operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 as abandoned project costs. However, the Company is still in negotiations with PNC to acquire a reduced size and price of the land it had agreed to under the agreement dated February 7, 2016 and apply the deposits to this restructured arrangement. Negotiations are under way, but the likelihood that the Company will be successful in reaching a satisfactory agreement is dependent on its ability to pay at least a portion of the new acquisition price. As a result, there can be no assurance that the acquisition will occur as contemplated or at all. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not incur any additional costs relating to this project.

The Company has two office lease agreements (Canada and Germany) with total lease payments of $~~154~~122,~~672~~798. The Company is contracted to make the following annual payments: not later than one year totaling $4144,~~153~~053; later than one year but not later than two years totaling $4144,~~286~~204; later than two years but not later than three years totaling $4121,~~419~~636; later than three years but not later than four years totaling $1912,~~459~~904; ~~later than four years but not later than five years totaling $11,355;~~ and no amounts later than ~~five~~four years.

Legal Matters

Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company, or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims, as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

~~F-37~~If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

F-46

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 1112 – Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

IfOn ~~the~~August ~~assessment~~6, of2015, aMrs. ~~contingency~~Gloria ~~indicates~~Julie Couillard ~~that~~and itTekno isForme ~~probable~~(“Plaintiffs”) ~~that~~filed a ~~material~~complaint ~~loss~~naming ~~has~~CTC, ~~been~~its ~~incurred~~President, ROI DEV, Philippe Germain and ~~the~~Sebastian Cliche ~~amount~~as co-defendants claiming unpaid fees of ~~the~~$207,638. ~~liability~~On ~~can~~September be2, ~~estimated~~2015, ~~then~~a ~~the~~default ~~estimated~~judgement was served against CTC. CTC ~~liability~~and ~~would~~its bePresident ~~accrued~~are inapplying to set aside the ~~Company’s~~default ~~consolidated~~judgement ~~financial~~against ~~statements.~~them Ifand the ~~assessment~~Company ~~indicates~~is ~~that~~opposing athe ~~potentially~~Plaintiff’s ~~material~~notice ~~loss~~of ~~contingency~~Application. isOn ~~not~~October ~~probable~~9, ~~but~~2015, isthe ~~reasonably~~Plaintiff ~~possible,~~registered ora islien ~~probable~~on ~~but~~the ~~cannot~~Company’s beCanadian ~~estimated,~~properties ~~then~~in the ~~nature~~amount of $207,638. On March 17, 2017, the ~~contingent~~Plaintiff ~~liability~~agreed ~~and~~to anrelease ~~estimate~~its ofjudgment filed against the ~~range~~Company’s ofCanadian ~~possible~~properties and ~~losses,~~removed ifits ~~determinable~~lien, ~~and~~in ~~material~~its entirety, ~~would~~registered beon ~~disclosed~~these properties.

On ~~August~~September 614, 2015, ~~Mrs.~~the ~~Gloria~~Company ~~Julie Couillard~~received ~~and~~a ~~Tekno~~notification ~~Forme~~from the American Arbitration Association (“~~Plaintiffs~~AAA”) ~~filed~~of a ~~complaint~~Request ~~naming~~for ~~CTC~~Mediation, ~~its~~dated ~~President~~September 8, ~~ROI~~2015, filed ~~DEV~~by Seth Shaw, ~~Philippe~~pursuant ~~Germain~~to a mediation and ~~Sebastian~~arbitration clause contained in a Consulting Agreement allegedly entered into between ~~Cliche~~the asCompany ~~co-defendants~~and ~~claiming~~Seth ~~unpaid~~Shaw ~~fees~~on ofMay ~~$207~~1,~~638~~ 2014. OnThe ~~September~~Company 2,executed ~~2015~~such agreement but believes that Seth Shaw failed to perform under said agreement. Mr. Shaw believes that the agreement is valid and in effect. The matter under dispute is 500,000 ashares ~~default~~of ~~judgement~~the Company’s ~~was~~Series ~~served~~A ~~against~~common ~~CTC~~stock which were to be issued to Mr. ~~CTC~~Shaw pursuant to such agreement. A certificate for such shares ~~and~~was ~~its~~issued ~~President~~but ~~are~~never ~~applying~~delivered to ~~set~~Mr. ~~aside~~Shaw, because the ~~default~~Company ~~judgement~~cancelled ~~against~~the ~~them~~Agreement for failure to perform. The Company cancelled the shares and recorded a liability for the ~~Company~~then isvalue ~~opposing~~of the ~~Plaintiff’s~~shares of $175,000 which was included in accounts payable and accrued ~~notice~~expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of ~~Application~~December 31, 2015. OnThe ~~October~~Company 9and Mr. Shaw met in mediation on February 22, ~~2015~~2016 with no resolution achieved. The parties then attended an arbitration evidentiary hearing on January 20, ~~the~~2017 ~~Plaintiff~~whereby ~~registered~~a final arbitration award was issued on March 30, 2017 and subsequently a ~~lien~~judgment was delivered by the United States District Court of Nevada on March 1, 2018 ruling that Mr. Shaw was entitled to recover $755,125 from the Company’s ~~Canadian~~for ~~properties~~breach inof ~~the~~contract ~~amount~~ claim, $103,110 of legal fees and $~~207~~3,~~638~~625 in costs. On ~~March~~August 176, ~~2017~~2018, ~~the~~a ~~Plaintiff~~Writ ~~agreed~~of Execution was issued to ~~release~~the ~~its~~US Marshal for the District of Nevada to enforce the judgment. ~~filed~~Subsequent ~~against~~to such events, the officers of the Company’s ~~Canadian~~and ~~properties~~Mr. Shaw have engaged in continuing discussions with each other toward settlement of all outstanding matters between them. Mr. Shaw has voluntarily refrained from further enforcement action and ~~removed~~the ~~its~~discussions ~~lien~~with the Company are ongoing. The Company believes it will be able to eventually succeed in reaching voluntary arrangements for settlement of the outstanding judgment in favor of Mr. Shaw and to resume a mutually constructive and amicable business relationship. The Company has not revised the recorded liability of $250,000 in ~~its~~accounts ~~entirety~~payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, ~~registered~~2017, onas it still represents the ~~these~~best ~~properties~~estimate of the possible outflows to settle this case.

OnDuring ~~September~~the 14year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2017, 1016566 ~~the~~B.C. ~~Company~~Ltd. (“1016566 B.C.”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ROI DEV, received a ~~notification~~Notice of Civil Claim from ~~the~~Snaring River ~~American~~Holdings ~~Arbitration~~Ltd. ~~Association~~dba Western Thermal & Demolition, a British Columbia construction subcontractor (“~~AAA~~Snaring River”). 1016566 B.C. Ltd. is the record title owner of acertain ~~Request~~real ~~for~~property ~~Mediation,~~known ~~dated~~as ~~September~~1015-1050 8Nalabila Boulevard, ~~2015~~Kitimat, ~~filed~~ ~~by Seth Shaw~~BC, ~~pursuant~~Canada (the to“ aKitimat ~~mediation~~Property”) and ~~arbitration~~was ~~clause~~acquired ~~contained~~from inCTC.. aSnaring ~~Consulting~~River ~~Agreement~~claims ~~allegedly~~to ~~entered~~have ~~into~~performed ~~between~~ work on the ~~Company~~Property ~~and~~as a ~~Seth~~subcontractor ~~Shaw~~for onIntactus ~~May~~Corporation 1(“Inactus”), ~~2014.~~a ~~The~~Canadian ~~Company~~corporation ~~executed~~performing ~~such~~general ~~agreement~~contractor ~~but~~services, and ~~believes~~Intactus ~~that~~allegedly ~~Seth~~was ~~Shaw~~contracted ~~failed~~by CTC to perform ~~under said~~certain ~~agreement.~~work Mron the Property. ~~Shaw~~As ~~believes~~a ~~that~~subcontractor on the ~~agreement~~Property, isSnaring River ~~valid~~filed and inclaimed ~~effect.~~certain ~~The~~rights ~~matter~~pursuant ~~under~~to ~~dispute~~the isBritish ~~500,000~~Columbia ~~shares~~Lien ofTrust ~~the Company’s~~Law ~~Series~~(“BCLTL”), Acomprising ~~common~~liens against ~~stock~~the ~~which~~Property ~~were~~and toclaims ~~be issued~~ to ~~Mr.~~certain ~~Shaw~~funds ~~pursuant~~allegedly required to ~~such~~have ~~agreement.~~been Awithheld ~~certificate~~in ~~for~~trust ~~such~~in ~~shares was~~its ~~issued~~favor, ~~but~~pursuant ~~never~~to ~~delivered~~the BCLTL. Pursuant to ~~Mr.~~such ~~Shaw~~claims, ~~because~~Snaring ~~the~~River ~~Company~~named ~~cancelled~~1016566 ~~the~~B.C. ~~Agreement~~as ~~for~~a ~~failure~~co-defendant towith ~~perform.~~Intactus ~~The~~in ~~Company~~Snaring ~~cancelled~~River’s Notice ~~the~~of ~~shares~~Civil ~~and~~Claim. ~~recorded~~Snaring aRiver’s ~~liability~~invoices for ~~the~~work ~~then~~at ~~value of~~ the ~~shares~~Property ofwere approximately $~~175~~255,000 ~~which~~(CAD ~~was~~320,000), ~~included~~without increditing any ~~accounts~~payments ~~payable~~received. ~~and~~In ~~accrued expenses~~a inletter ~~the~~dated ~~consolidated~~April ~~balance~~4, ~~sheet~~2018, asSnaring ofRiver ~~December~~claimed ~~31,~~to ~~2015.~~add ~~The~~ Company ~~and~~as ~~Mr.~~a ~~Shaw~~defendant ~~met~~ in ~~mediation~~its onNotice ~~February~~of ~~22, 2016~~Civil ~~with~~Claim noby ~~resolution~~reason ~~achieved.~~of ~~The~~Company’s ~~parties~~indirect ~~then~~interest ~~attended~~in anthe ~~arbitration~~Property ~~evidentiary~~through ~~hearing~~intermediary onsubsidiaries. ~~January~~The ~~20,~~Company ~~2017~~does ~~whereby~~not believe (i) that the ~~arbitrator, on~~Company ~~March~~has ~~30,~~derivative ~~2017,~~liability ~~issued~~to aSnaring ~~final~~River ~~award~~on ~~ruling~~account ~~that~~of ~~Mr.~~actions/inactions ~~Shaw~~of ~~was~~its ~~entitled~~subsidiary toor ~~recover~~affiliate ~~$755~~entities,~~125~~ (ii) ~~from~~that the Company ~~for~~has ~~breach~~direct ofliability ~~contract claim~~to ~~and~~Snaring ~~$103~~River,~~110~~ of(iii) ~~legal~~that ~~fees.~~Snaring ~~The~~River’s ~~Company~~legal ~~intends~~conclusions toare ~~vigorously~~supported ~~defend~~by case ~~itself~~law, inor ~~judicial~~(iv) ~~court~~that ~~from~~the ~~these~~facts ~~claims~~will bysupport ~~Mr.~~Snaring ~~Shaw and~~River’s ~~has~~allegations ~~recorded~~against athe ~~liability~~Company. ~~of $250~~Moreover,~~000~~ inthe ~~accounts~~Company ~~payable~~does not ~~and~~believe ~~accrued~~Snaring ~~expenses~~River’s inNotice ~~the~~of ~~consolidated~~Civil ~~balance~~Claim ~~sheet~~can asor ofwill ~~December 31,~~prevail ~~2016,~~against as1016566 ~~being~~B.C. ~~the~~and ~~best~~has ~~estimate~~not ofrecorded any liability on the ~~possible~~consolidated ~~outflows~~balance tosheet ~~settle~~as ~~this~~of ~~case~~December 31, 2017.

~~Note 12 – Subsequent Events~~F-47

Subsequent to December 31, 2016, the Company received from eight accredited investors a total of $1,079,749 as deposits for the purchase of its Series B Preferred Shares and shall also receive from them a total of 395,555 shares of the Company’s common stock held by them to be held in treasury in exchange for a total of 1,395,555 Series B Preferred Shares.

Subsequent to December 31, 2016, ROI SEC received $1,316,068 as deposits for ROI Securitization notes. The terms of the notes and the issuance date have not yet been established.

On January 20, 2017, the parties attended an arbitration evidentiary hearing whereby the arbitrator, on March 30, 2017, issued a final award ruling that Mr. Shaw was entitled to recover $755,125 from the Company for breach of contract claim and $103,110 of legal fees. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in judicial court from these claims by Mr. Shaw and has recorded a liability of $250,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2016, as being the best estimate of the possible outflows to settle this case.

On May 18, 2017, the Company cancelled 100,000 shares of the Series A preferred stock held by Sami Chaouch upon his resignation as Director and Chief Executive Officer and his surrender of said shares. In connection with the Company’s settlement agreement between Sami Chaouch, the Company agreed to issue 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series B preferred stock, however, the Company has not yet issued these shares.

F-38

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Note 12 – ~~Subsequent~~Commitments ~~Events~~and Contingencies (Continued)

OnA case was filed against the Company entitled, Timo Pfisterer, plaintiff-appellant, v. ROI Land Investments Ltd., defendant-appellee, in the Landesarbeitsgericht (Regional Labor Court) for Baden-Württemberg, 4th Chamber, Case number: 4 Sa 6/18 29 Ca 1854/17 ArbG Stuttgart. The subject of the litigation concerns a labor dispute brought by Mr. Pfisterer against the Company arising from activities in Europe. While the Company had secured judgment in its favor dismissing plaintiff’s claims, on oral hearing of August 2215, ~~2017~~2018, the judgment in favor of the Company ~~sent~~was reversed in favor of the plaintiff-appellant, Mr. Pfisterer. The reviewing court reversed and granted a ~~written~~decision in favor of plaintiff-appellant in an ~~notice~~amount of approximately $1 million (subject to ~~all~~final determination of ~~its~~interest ~~convertible~~and ~~note~~costs ~~holders~~allowances). ~~(Beauport~~The Company believes the subsequent decision is erroneous, ~~Quebec~~that ~~project)~~Company has meritorious defenses, and that it has a path to ~~notify~~review. ~~them~~Upon the advice of German counsel, the Company believes that on review the decision of the Regional Labor Court is more likely than not to be reversed on grounds of error based on various reasons including but not limited to the lack of basis for jurisdiction against the Company by ~~shall~~a ~~execute~~German ~~its~~Labor ~~option~~Court and the decision of the German Labor Court is not final in that it is still subject to pending litigation that is more than likely to ~~extend~~result in the ~~maturity~~reversal ~~date~~of the decision and dismissal of plaintiff-appellant’s case on the ~~convertible~~merits with ~~notes~~prejudice by(a anjudgment ~~additional~~of 18a ~~months~~foreign court can provide only a basis for commencing a new plenary action in a U.S or state court). The Company has filed a complaint against non-admission, which is a German proceeding with power to vacate the decision of the Regional Labor Court to seek such review and has not recorded any liability on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.

OnNote ~~October~~13 3,– ~~2017,~~Subsequent the Company’s Board of Directors of authorized the re-issuance of the 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock previously re-acquired by the Company from Sami Chaouch on May 18, 2017, to Martin Scholz, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.Events

On ~~December~~January 2118, ~~2017~~201 8, ~~the~~in ~~Company entered into~~connection awith the Design & Licensing Agreement ~~with~~entered ~~Swarovski~~on ~~Brand~~December ~~License~~22, AG2017, ~~(“Swarovski”) which provides~~ the Company, ~~with~~through ~~an exclusive~~FL2, ~~license~~made toits ~~design~~first ~~and~~license fee payment to ~~develop the~~ Swarovski ~~Towers building~~ in the ~~Dubai~~amount ~~(United~~of ~~Arab~~$525,000 ~~Emirates)~~which ~~territory.~~was ~~The~~recorded ~~Company plans~~as tointangible ~~develop~~asset ~~the~~in ~~world’s first luxury hotel and residential property revealing~~ the ~~exceptional~~consolidated ~~standards~~balance ofsheet ~~high-quality design~~as ~~and decor~~ of ~~the Swarovski brand. The Company is still in discussions with project partners to achieve its plans to launch~~December ~~the~~31, ~~project in year 2018~~2017.

On February 6, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors increased the number of its members from 2 to 3 by appointing Yuhi Horiguchi to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Sebastien Cliche on December 29, 2017.

On February 26, 2018, the Company appointed Ms. Claudia Nelke as Vice President of Administration.

On March 1, 2018, a judgment was delivered by the United States District Court of Nevada ruling that Mr. Shaw was entitled to recover $755,125 from the Company for breach of contract claim, $103,110 of legal fees and $3,625 in costs.

On March 31, 2018, the Company entered into another amendment to the Colorado Seller Note by repaying $1,378,677 of the principal balance and prepaying a 12% annual interest of $120,000 through its new extended maturity date to March 30, 2019.

On April 15, 2018, the Company, through HLST1, entered into a loan agreement between FL2 Holdings Limited (“FL2”), a Dubai U.A.E company, upon signing of this agreement, a total of $5,591,948 of advance payments made by the Company to FL2 through such date were reclassified to loans receivable from affiliate, which bear 8% of annual interest and matures in three years after the first deployment of the loan proceeds. On the same date, the Company also entered into an investment agreement between the shareholders of FL2 so that the Company shall be entitled to receive a 25% equity interest in FL2 in exchange for providing up to $32 million in loans to FL2 with an additional $34 million of potential future investments.

On May 14, 2018, the Company and Artizan entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Company shall pay to Artizan a total of $150,000, including late fees, in two equal payments of $75,000 on May 15, 2018 and July 15, 2018, as full and final settlement for its outstanding payables. These payments were satisfied in full by the Company.

F-48

ROI Land Investments Ltd. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2017 and 2016

Note 13 – Subsequent Events (Continued)

On May 31, 2018, the Company also sent a written notice to all of its Terrace note holders to notify them about the exercise of the Company’s option to extend the maturity date of the notes by an additional 18 months.

On June 7, 2018, the Company and one of its service providers entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Company agrees to pay $120,000 in cash to such service provider and to issue 333,442 shares of Series B preferred stock immediately upon removal of the Company’s FTFCTO by the AMF, as full and final settlement of the Company’s outstanding payables amounting to $466,435 (CAD 585,539).

On July 14, 2018, the Company formed ROI Group Management S.à.r.l., a Luxembourg limited liability company, as a wholly-owned subsidiary, and on July 25, 2018 the Company formed ROI Meatpacking SCS, a Luxembourg limited partnership, as a 90%-owned subsidiary. ROI Meatpacking SCS was formed to hold the Company’s interest in the New York Meatpacking Project (Refer to Note 13 Subsequent Events) and ROI Group Management S.à.r.l. was formed to act as the general partner and manager of ROI Meatpacking SCS.

On September 7, 2018, the Company, through ROI Meatpacking SCS, signed an agreement to subscribe to a 22.67% interest in a mixed-use redevelopment project in the heart of New York City Meatpacking District. On October 24, 2018, the Company completed its payment of $10 million and expects to pay the balance no later than November 24, 2018.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and filed with the SEC. The Company has determined that there are no other significant events that warrant disclosure or recognition in the consolidated financial statements.

F-3949

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

/s/ Martin Scholz		~~December~~November 299, ~~2017~~2018
Martin Scholz, Principal Executive Officer		Date

/s/ Yuhi Horiguchi		~~December~~November 299, ~~2017~~2018
Yuhi Horiguchi, Principal Financial Officer		Date

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Martin Scholz		~~December~~November 299, ~~2017~~2018
Martin Scholz, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors		Date
Martin Scholz, Chief Executive Officer		Date

/s/ Stéphane Boivon		December 29, 2017
/s/ Yuhi Horiguchi		November 9, 2018
Stéphane Boivin, Chief Operating Officer and Director		Date
Yuhi Horiguchi, Chief Financial Officer		Date

/s/ Sebastien Cliche		December 29, 2017
Sebastien Cliche, President and Director		Date

Filing Compare · ROI LAND INVESTMENTS LTD