United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
____________
FORM 10-Q
x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009
£	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15[d] OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ________ to ________.
Commission File No. 0-8117
____________
CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST						®
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas					75-6030254
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)					(IRS Employer Identification No.)
5305 W Interstate 40, Amarillo, Texas					79106-4759
(Address of principal executive office)					(Zip Code)
(806) 358-3666
(Issuer’s telephone number including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
____________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
		Large accelerated filer £	Accelerated filer £
		Non-accelerated filer £	Smaller reporting company x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No x
Class				Outstanding at ~~February~~July 1321, 2009
Shares of beneficial interest, $0.00 par value per share				10,217,094

CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST FORM 10-Q For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2008
CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST FORM 10-Q For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
INDEX
Page
Part I.	Financial Information
	Item 1.			Financial Statements:
		a)			Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited) ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and March 31, ~~2008~~2009	1
		b)			Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited) for the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008	2
		c)			Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the ~~nine~~three-month periods ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008	3
		d)			Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4
	Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			76
	Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			1618
	Item 4T.		Controls and Procedures			1620
Part II.	Other Information
	Item 1.		Legal Proceedings			1620
	Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			1620
	Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities			1620
	Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			1620
	Item 5.		Other Information			1620
	Item 6.		Exhibits			1720
Index to Exhibits						1821
Signatures						1922

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST
(A Real Estate Investment Trust)
Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008
June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009
ASSETS
			December 31, 2008		March 31, 2008
			June 30, 2009		March 31, 2009
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	$		83116,~~470~~564	$	~~109~~115,~~987~~694
RECEIVABLES
Mortgage loans and church bonds – performing			5458,~~908~~332,~~182~~924		5055,~~389~~512,~~558~~158
Interim construction loans – performing			815,~~802~~289,~~154~~905		1116,~~611~~686,~~879~~014
Nonperforming mortgage loans, church bonds and interim construction loans			6,~~769~~989,~~247~~621		56,~~930~~747,~~850~~480
Less: Allowance for credit losses			(1,~~551~~676,760)		(1,~~786~~626,~~477~~760)
			68,927,823		66,145,810
			78,935,690		77,318,892
Accrued interest receivable			~~545~~632,~~941~~445		~~608~~577,~~930~~413
Notes receivable			21,000		21,000
Net receivables			6979,~~475~~569,~~764~~135		6677,~~756~~897,~~740~~305
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net			~~215~~214,~~448~~416		~~216~~214,~~996~~932
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED			-		1,735,650
OTHER ASSETS			75,320		87,644
OTHER ASSETS			135,925		36,950
TOTAL ASSETS	$		79,975,435	$	78,315,575
TOTAL ASSETS	$		69,910,607	$	68,856,323
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Notes payable and line of credit:
Related parties		$	1112,~~408~~633,~~836~~598	$	1312,~~059~~601,~~425~~983
Other			2435,~~922~~621,~~187~~637		2434,~~380~~276,~~966~~153
			36,331,023		37,440,391
			48,255,235		46,878,136
Accrued interest payable			3699,~~593~~105		4995,~~617~~349
Dividends payable			2,860,786		-
Other			285,960		241,360
Other			133,098		183,011
Total liabilities			48,640,300		47,214,845
Total liabilities			39,361,500		37,673,019
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Shares of beneficial interest, no par value; authorized shares unlimited, 10,223,690 shares issued			29,762,291		29,762,291
Undistributed net income			~~803~~1,~~306~~589,334		1,~~437~~354,~~503~~929
Treasury shares, at cost (6,596 shares)			(16,490)		(16,490)
Total shareholders’ equity			3031,~~549~~335,~~107~~135		31,~~183~~100,~~304~~730
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	6979,~~910~~975,~~607~~435	$	6878,~~856~~315,~~323~~575
These condensed financial statements should be read only in connection with the accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

-1-

CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST

~~CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST~~

(A Real Estate Investment Trust)

~~(A Real Estate Investment Trust)~~

Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited)

~~Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited)~~

Three-month and Nine-month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Three-month periods ended December 31,

Nine-month periods ended December 31,

Three-month periods ended June 30,

2008

2007

2008

2007

2009

2008

INTEREST AND FEE INCOME:

~~INTEREST AND FEE INCOME:~~

Interest income

~~Interest income~~$

1,467,607

1,572,430

~~1,330,014~~

~~1,633,527~~

~~4,249,353~~

~~4,953,003~~

Fee income

~~Fee income~~

114,956

112,452

~~230,142~~

~~238,170~~

~~464,120~~

~~635,681~~

Interest and fee income

~~Interest and fee income~~

1,582,563

1,684,882

~~1,560,156~~

~~1,871,697~~

~~4,713,473~~

~~5,588,684~~

INTEREST EXPENSE

~~INTEREST EXPENSE~~

438,859

361,860

~~272,110~~

~~682,180~~

~~988,567~~

~~2,261,364~~

Net interest income

~~Net interest income~~

1,143,704

1,323,022

~~1,288,046~~

~~1,189,517~~

~~3,724,906~~

~~3,327,320~~

PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES

~~PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES~~

50,000

~~95,000~~

~~125,000~~

Net interest income less provision for possible credit losses

~~Net interest income less provision for possible credit losses~~

1,093,704

1,323,022

~~1,288,046~~

~~1,189,517~~

~~3,629,906~~

~~3,202,320~~

OTHER INCOME

~~OTHER INCOME~~

Gain on sale of other real estate owned

~~Gain on sale of other real estate owned~~

525

~~76,076~~

~~508,555~~

Other

~~Other~~

18,659

6,886

~~21,000~~

~~12,773~~

~~40,126~~

~~40,021~~

Other income

~~Other income~~

19,184

6,886

~~97,076~~

~~12,773~~

~~116,202~~

~~548,576~~

OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES

~~OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES~~

General and administrative

~~General and administrative~~

246,556

284,955

~~222,565~~

~~262,659~~

~~746,122~~

~~1,197,693~~

Board of Trust Managers’ fees

~~Board of Trust Managers’ fees~~

18,900

19,000

~~20,400~~

~~11,600~~

~~58,200~~

~~34,400~~

Total other operating expenses

~~Total other operating expenses~~

265,456

303,955

~~242,965~~

~~274,259~~

~~804,322~~

~~1,232,093~~

NET INCOME

~~NET INCOME~~$

847,432

1,025,953

~~1,142,157~~

~~928,031~~

~~2,941,786~~

~~2,518,803~~

NET INCOME PER SHARE

~~NET INCOME PER SHARE~~$

.08

.10

~~.11~~

~~.09~~

~~.29~~

~~.25~~

DIVIDENDS PER SHARE

~~DIVIDENDS PER SHARE~~$

.06

.07

~~.28~~

~~.25~~

~~.35~~

~~.31~~

These condensed financial statements should be read only in connection with the accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

~~These condensed financial statements should be read only in connection with the accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.~~

-2-

CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST
(A Real Estate Investment Trust)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine-month periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
		Nine-month periods ended December 31,
		Three-month periods ended June 30,
		2008		2007
		2009		2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	2847,~~941,786~~432	$	21,~~518~~025,~~803~~953
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		~~1,548~~516		~~1,548~~516
Gain on sale of other real estate owned		(76,076)		(508,555)
Amortization of loan discounts		(2,749)		(3,649)
Amortization of loan discounts		(31,291)		(25,444)
Amortization of commitment fees		(105,166)		(110,194)
Amortization of commitment fees		(359,399)		(576,196)
Provision for credit losses		50,000		-
Provision for credit losses		95,000		125,000
Changes in:
Accrued interest receivable		62(55,~~989~~032)		(~~94,559~~929)
Accrued interest payable		~~(13~~3,~~024)~~756		(369,~~362~~829)
Federal income tax payable		~~(22,739)~~-		-(22,739)
Other liabilities		~~(27~~44,~~174)~~600		~~(11~~61,~~887)~~241
Other, net		~~(98~~12,~~975)~~324		(2249,~~168~~116)
Net cash provided by operating activities		2795,~~472,645~~681		1891,~~370,180~~254
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investment in mortgage and interim construction loans and church bonds		(157,~~704~~256,~~362~~643)		(261,~~266~~917,~~728~~164)
Payments received on mortgage and interim construction loans and church bonds		135,~~218~~697,~~039~~759		293,~~920~~026,~~534~~450
Payments received on notes receivable		-		1,000
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		(1,558,884)		1,109,286
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		1,811,726		1,025,000
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		(674,597)		4,679,806
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Borrowings on notes payable and line of credit		227,~~996~~475,~~518~~397		314,~~511~~699,~~018~~938
Principal payments on notes payable and line of credit		(246,~~105~~098,~~886~~299)		(375,~~270~~889,~~196~~704)
Overdraft payable		-		226,806
Cash dividends		(613,026)		(715,197)
Cash dividends		(715,197)		(613,026)
Net cash provided by financing activities		764,072		(1,904,963)
Net cash used by financing activities		(1,824,565)		(6,145,398)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		869		95,577
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(26,517)		(95,412)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		115,694		109,987
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		109,987		95,412
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	116,563	$	205,564
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	83,470	$	-
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	1435,~~001,591~~103	$	2371,~~297,726~~689
Dividends declared, not paid	$	2,860,786	$	2,554,274
These condensed financial statements should be read only in connection with the accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

-3-

CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST

(A Real Estate Investment Trust)

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – GENERAL

See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for a summary of the Trust’s significant accounting policies.

The unaudited condensed financial statements included herein were prepared from the books of the Trust in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted ~~accounting~~in ~~principles~~the United States and reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results of operations and financial position for the interim periods. Such financial statements generally conform to the presentation reflected in the Trust’s Annual Report to Shareholders. The current interim period reported herein is included in the fiscal year subject to independent audit at the end of that year and is not necessarily an indication of the expected results for the fiscal year.

NOTE 2 - WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTEREST RATES

Weighted average interest rates and net interest rate margins at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, were as follows:

	Mortgage loan and church bond portfolio	Total indebtedness	Net interest rate margin
December 31, 2008	7.72%	2.86%	4.86%
June 30, 2009	7.48%	3.73%	3.75%
December 31, 2007	8.51%	6.35%	2.16%
June 30, 2008	8.40%	3.83%	4.57%

NOTE 3 - CONTRACTUAL MATURITIES

Scheduled principal payments on mortgage loans, church bonds and interim construction loans and indebtedness (including notes payable) outstanding at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009, for the five twelve-month periods subsequent to ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009, follow:

Twelve-month period ending December 31,	Mortgage loans, church bonds and interim loans		Total Indebtedness
Twelve-month period ending June 30,	Mortgage loans, church bonds and interim loans		Total Indebtedness
2009		$ 14,779,231	$ 16,015,000
2010		$ 21,546,679	$ 20,940,235
2010		2,606,234	20,316,023
2011		2,817,016	27,315,000
2011		2,754,921	-
2012		2,972,789	-
2012		2,845,077	-
2013		2,944,555	-
2013		2,596,289	-
2014		2,692,439	-

NOTE 4 - MORTGAGE LOANS, CHURCH BONDS AND INTERIM CONSTRUCTION LOANS

Mortgage loans, church bonds and interim construction loans on which the accrual of interest had been discontinued amounted to $6,~~769~~989,~~247~~621 and $54,~~947~~936,~~875~~597 at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, respectively. If interest on these mortgage loans, church bonds and interim construction loans had been accrued as earned, interest and fees on loans in the accompanying condensed statements of income would have been increased by approximately $~~468~~246,000 and $~~346~~36,000 for the ~~nine~~three-month periods ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, respectively. Interest income actually recognized on such loans during ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008 was approximately $~~176~~35,000 and $~~128~~61,000, respectively. In addition, impaired loans were approximately $1213,~~257~~932,000 and $1412,~~456~~710,000 at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~March 31, 2009, respectively.

-4-

CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST

(A Real Estate Investment Trust)

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 5 – ~~FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS~~PROUNCEMENTS

~~Effective~~On ~~April~~May 128, ~~2008~~2009, the ~~Trust~~FASB ~~adopted~~issued SFAS No. ~~157~~165, ~~“Fair~~Subsequent ~~Value Measurements~~Events,” which ~~requires~~provides ~~disclosures~~guidance on management’s assessment of subsequent events. Historically, management had relied on U.S. auditing literature for ~~those~~guidance ~~assets~~on assessing and ~~liabilities~~disclosing ~~carried~~subsequent events. SFAS No. 165 represents the inclusion of guidance on subsequent events in the accounting literature and is directed specifically to management, since management is responsible for preparing an entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 165 clarifies that management must evaluate, as of each reporting period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet ondate athrough ~~fair~~the ~~value~~date ~~basis~~that the financial statements are issued. ~~The~~ ~~Financial~~SFAS ~~Accounting~~No. ~~Standard~~165 ~~Board~~is ~~(FASB)~~effective prospectively for interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company has ~~deferred~~adopted the ~~effective~~provisions ~~date~~ of SFAS No. ~~157~~165 ~~until~~for its reporting period ending June 30, 2009. ~~for~~The ~~nonfinancial~~adoption ~~assets~~of ~~and~~SFAS ~~liabilities~~No. ~~which~~165 ~~are~~did ~~recognized~~not athave ~~fair~~a ~~value~~material impact on athe ~~nonrecurring~~Company’s ~~basis~~financial condition or results of operations. ~~For~~ The Company has evaluated subsequent events up through the ~~Trust,~~date ~~this~~of ~~deferral~~the ~~applies~~filing toof ~~other~~this ~~real~~report ~~estate~~with ~~owned~~the SEC.

SFAS No. 157 requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value also be classified and disclosed according to the process for determining fair value. There are three levels of determining fair value.

Level 1 uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 uses observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3 uses unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The following table presents the assets carried on the balance sheet by caption and by level with the SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy as of December 31, 2008:

Description

Total

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)

Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets:

Impaired Loans

$ 12,257,224

$ -

$ 12,257,224

Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

On February 15, 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, "The Fair Value Opinion for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits, but does not require, entities to measure selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value are recorded through the income statement in subsequent periods. The statement provides for a one time opportunity to transfer existing assets and liabilities to fair value at the point of adoption with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded against equity. After adoption, the election to report assets and liabilities at fair value must be made at the point of their inception. There has been no impact on the financial statements of the Trust as a result of the adoption of FAS 159 during fiscal year 2009 since the Trust has not elected the fair value option for any eligible items, as defined in FAS 159.

NOTE 6 – LEGAL CONTINGENCIES

Various legal claims arise from time to time in the normal course of business which, in the opinion of management, will have no material effect on the Trust's financial statements.

NOTE 7 – RECLASSIFICATION

Certain insignificant amounts in prior quarters have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

-5-

NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT

Effective January 31, 2009, the Trust obtained a new loan agreement with Amarillo National Bank. Under the terms of the new loan agreement, the line of credit was increased from $35,000,000 to $49,000,000 with a three year maturity and the interest rate on the line of credit adjusts in accordance with the lesser of the 30-day, 90-day or 180-day London Interbank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”) or the J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. prime rate. The new loan agreement provides for an interest rate floor of 4%.

This information is an integral part of the accompanying condensed financial statements.

-65-

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS DISCLOSURE

This ~~Quarterly~~Annual Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact made in this discussion are forward-looking, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue” or other similar words. The forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current plans and expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, including:


		•		Competition in the business of making loans to churches;
		•		A decline in general economic conditions;
		•		A decline in real estate values affecting the value of the collateral securing our loans;
		•		A rise in interest rates resulting in higher cost of funds to us prior to the re-pricing of the loans owing to us;
		•		Our inability to borrow funds and at reasonable rates of interest;
		•		General risks of lending;
		•		Change in federal or state laws affecting our operations;
		•		Loss of critical management; and
		•		Other risks.

These risks and uncertainties are not intended to be exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with other cautionary statements made in this ~~Quarterly~~Annual Report.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the financial statements. Certain accounting policies require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and we consider these to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions used are based on historical experience, as well as other factors, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material impact on the carrying value of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and results of operations for the reporting periods.

We believe that the following critical accounting policies require the most significant estimates and assumptions that are particularly susceptible to a significant change in the preparation of our financial statements.

Revenue Recognition. We accrue interest income as it is earned. All past due loans are reviewed monthly by management and the ~~Loan~~Audit Committee. InA past due loan is evaluated based upon the ~~past~~payment history, ~~this~~opinion ~~has~~of ~~been~~ the ~~responsibility~~ultimate collectibility of the ~~management~~principal and ~~the~~interest ~~Audit~~and ~~Committee~~other experience factors. ~~However,~~The ~~effective~~accrual ~~July~~of 1,interest ~~2008,~~is ~~the~~generally ~~board~~discontinued ofon ~~trust~~loans ~~managers~~and ~~shifted~~church bonds more than 60 days past due unless the ~~Audit~~credit ~~Committee’s~~is ~~responsibilities~~well ~~relative~~secured toand in the ~~review~~process of ~~past~~collection. In ~~due~~all cases, loans and ~~the~~bonds ~~classification~~are ofplaced ~~the~~on ~~past~~nonaccrual ~~due~~or ~~loans~~charged-off toat ~~the~~an ~~Loan~~earlier ~~Committee.~~date, if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

AOnce ~~past~~a ~~due~~loan is placed on non-accrual, the loan will be classified as either “cash basis” or “capital recovery.” A loan is ~~evaluated~~typically ~~based~~classified ~~upon~~as “cash basis” if the ~~payment~~Audit ~~history~~Committee believes, ~~opinion~~based upon several factors, that there is a strong likelihood that the principal of the ~~ultimate~~loan ~~collectibility~~will be recovered, but is concerned that not all of the ~~principal~~interest ~~and~~will be recovered. If a loan is classified as “cash basis,” then interest ~~and~~payments ~~other~~received ~~experience~~will ~~factors. The~~be ~~accrual~~applied ofto interest income. A loan is ~~generally~~typically ~~discontinued~~classified onas ~~loans~~“capital ~~and~~recovery” ~~church~~if ~~bonds~~the ~~more~~Audit ~~than~~Committee 60believes, ~~days~~based ~~past~~upon ~~due~~several ~~unless~~factors, ~~the~~that ~~credit~~there is ~~well~~a ~~secured~~strong ~~and~~likelihood inthat ~~process~~we ofmay ~~collection. In~~not be able to recover all ~~cases,~~of ~~loans~~the ~~and~~principal ~~bonds~~balance ~~are~~of ~~placed~~the onloan. In ~~nonaccrual~~the orevent ~~charged-off~~that ata anloan ~~earlier~~is ~~date~~classified as “capital recovery,” ifthen ~~collection~~payments ofreceived are applied to principal orfirst ~~interest~~and isthen ~~considered~~to ~~doubtful~~interest.

~~Once~~The aactual ~~loan~~decision isto ~~placed~~place a loan on non-accrual, and the ~~loan~~classification ~~will~~of bethe ~~classified~~loan as either “cash basis” or “capital recovery.” A ~~loan~~ is ~~typically~~made ~~classified~~by ~~as “cash basis” if~~ the ~~Loan~~Audit Committee ~~believes,~~with ~~based~~input ~~upon~~from ~~several factors, that there is a strong likelihood that the principal of the loan will be recovered, but is concerned that all of the interest will be recovered~~management. If a loan is classified as “cash basis,” then interest payments received will be applied to interest income. A loan is typically classified as “capital recovery” if the Loan Committee believes, based upon several factors, that there is a strong likelihood that we may not be able to recover all of the principal balance of the loan. In the event that a loan is classified as “capital recovery,” then payments received are applied to principal first and then to interest.

-76-

~~The~~Non-accrual ~~actual~~status ~~decision~~loans toare ~~place~~returned ato ~~loan~~an ~~on non-~~accrual ~~and~~status when in the ~~classification~~opinion of the ~~loan~~Audit asCommittee, ~~either~~based ~~“cash~~upon ~~basis”~~input orfrom ~~“capital~~management, ~~recovery”~~such is ~~made~~warranted bybased upon the ~~Loan~~passing ~~Committee~~of ~~with~~a ~~input~~sufficient ~~from~~time ~~management~~period during which the principal and interest have become current and remain current and, therefore, the loan, both principal and interest, is anticipated to be fully collectible.

Non-accrual status loans are returned to an accrual status when in the opinion of the Loan Committee, based upon input from management, that such is warranted based upon the passing of a sufficient time period during which the principal and interest have become current and remain current and, therefore, the loan, both principal and interest, is anticipated to be fully collectible.

Allowance for Credit Losses. The Audit Committee reviews the allowance for credit losses at the end of each quarter. The provision for losses is based on an amount that is adequate, in the opinion of the Audit Committee, based upon input from management, to absorb losses inherent in the existing portfolio. The evaluation, which includes a review of all loans on which full collection may not be reasonably assumed, considers among other factors, general economic conditions, the fair market value or estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral securing the loan, past experience, trends in loan delinquency and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an adequate allowance to absorb inherent losses. The evaluation by the Audit Committee includes a review of a quarterly grading methodology performed by management on all past-due loans. The Audit Committee, based upon its evaluation and review, then makes a recommendation to the full Board of Trust Managers as to the recommended amount of the credit loss reserve. The Board of Trust Managers, based upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, establishes the amount of the allowance for credit losses and any adjustments to such allowance.

Other Real Estate Owned. Other real estate owned (OREO) represents property acquired as a result of a foreclosure of a mortgage note(s) held by Church Loans. OREO is recorded at estimated fair value less cost to sell at date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. After foreclosure, OREO is carried at the lower of the carrying amount or estimated fair value minus estimated cost to sell. Impairment losses are charged to operations. Costs of the foreclosure, insurance and other costs associated with carrying the property are expensed.

Management has discussed our critical accounting policies and the development, selection and disclosure of the estimates and alternatives with the Audit Committee ~~and the Loan Committee~~ of the Board of Trust Managers and obtained their approval of the applicable disclosures contained in this report.

Overview

Church Loans was founded in May of 1959 and was organized to assist churches with the financing of purchases and construction of church facilities. Church Loans has also made loans for the financing of assisted living centers. Although we were originally organized under the corporate structure, we reorganized in 1963 as a real estate investment trust in order to take advantage of the favorable provisions of the federal tax law applicable to real estate investment trusts.

Our loan portfolio consists primarily of loans to churches and is comprised of both permanent loans and interim construction loans. Although, we have purchased existing loans from other lenders, our primary operating strategy is to originate, either through mortgage loan brokers, church bond broker-dealers or directly to churches, mortgage loans secured by a first mortgage against a church’s buildings and related facilities. We rarely, if ever, sell a loan and, therefore, we intend to hold our loan portfolio to maturity. Our underwriting standards normally include compiled, reviewed or audited financial statements depending on the size of the loan, a fair market value appraisal prepared by an independent appraiser, a first mortgage on the property of the church insured by a title insurance policy issued by a national title company, applicable fire and extended casualty insurance on the collateral and such other requirements as determined by management on a case by case basis. Also, as part of our due diligence, management normally makes, prior to funding, an onsite inspection of the property that is to secure the loan.

Originally, our Declaration of Trust required a debt-to-value ratio of not greater than 66 2/3%. However, at our annual meeting of shareholders held on July 16, 2004, the shareholders approved an Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Bylaws that raised the debt-to-value ratio to 85% unless substantial justification exists because of the presence of other underwriting criteria. Most of our present loans were made based upon the prior 66 2/3% debt-to-value ratio.

As a real estate investment trust, we are required by Section 857 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, to distribute not less than 90% of our taxable net income to our shareholders. Dividends are based on taxable income which varies from net income reported in the financial statements because of temporary differences (differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years). Future dividends may be more or less than the net income reported in the financial statements because of variances in these temporary differences.

-7-

Management continues to pursue quality new loans, both interim and permanent. We continue to receive many inquiries for loans. However, many of those inquiries over the past 12 months have not met our underwriting standards. We believe that our underwriting standards are one of the reasons why Church Loans has not been significantly impacted by the recent economic downturn. Presently, we are seeing less competition for these loans by banks and, in fact, it appears that some banks are attempting to liquidate their holdings of church loans that the banks acquired over the past few years.

Our interim loans come primarily from two sources. One source is churches that are issuing church bond offerings on a best efforts basis. Over the years, we have had many referrals from broker dealers who assist churches in bond offerings. These referrals resulted in a good source of interim loans or what is commonly referred to as “bridge loans” pursuant to which we provided the church with the funds to acquire a property, re-finance existing debt or start construction until the funds from the bond offering were available.

The other source of interim loans are loans for which we have agreed to make the permanent loan but are treating and carrying the loans as interim loans during the construction phase. Once construction is finished, then the loan is converted to a permanent amortized loan and then carried and treated as a permanent loan. Permanent loans have slightly increased as some interim loans have moved into permanent status by design. Also, more of the loans that we have recently made have been acquisitions rather than construction and, therefore, never were treated as interim loans. We would anticipate that with the current economic realities that the acquisition of existing church properties may be more affordable than construction of new properties and, therefore, this may be a continuing trend.

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, loan applications and inquiries have been steady. It appears that contributing to our steady flow of loan requests may be the fact that some banks and other lenders have moved away from this type of lending as a result of the present economic conditions. It appears that the present economic environment and the possible restriction on the ability of banks and some other lenders to make real estate loans may actually provide us with a good opportunity to acquire additional loans. Based on such belief, in January of this year, we enlarged our credit facility with Amarillo National Bank from $35,000,000 to $49,000,000. The increase in our portfolio of loans during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 seems to reflect this belief.

We have seen an increase in defaulted loans in our portfolio during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2009. We anticipate that if churches experience a decrease in contributions, then churches will first cut programs. We anticipate that only in the most dire situations will a church not make its mortgage payment and risk losing its property especially considering the equity that most of our borrowers have in their property due to the more conservative lending criteria that we have historically used. We will continue to closely monitor our past due loans and take action as is necessary.

We appear to be able to maintain and, in fact, increase our necessary financing. As mentioned, we recently increased our credit facility from $35M to $49M. Furthermore, although Master Note balances have decreased from $23,997,625 as of June 30, 2008 to $20,945,235 as of June 30, 2009 (a decrease of 13%), we believe that the Master Notes will continue to be a dependable source of financing. At the January 27, 2009 meeting of the Board of Trust Managers, we instituted a 3% floor on the interest rate we pay on such Master Notes effective as of February 1, 2009 in a move to encourage the maintenance of this source of funding. Since implementing such interest rate floor, Master Note balances have increased from $19,949,445 as of February 28, 2009 to $20,940,235 as of June 30, 2009.

Results of Operations --- Three-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2008

Our revenues are derived from interest income and fees earned on loans as well as, to a lesser degree, interest earned on church bonds and short-term investments. During the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, interest income and fees decreased by $102,319 (6%) over the three-month period ended June 30, 2008.

The decrease in interest income and fees for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 was primarily attributable to a decrease in the weighted average interest rate on our portfolio of loans and the decrease in other income and fees.

-8-

~~Management~~The ~~continues~~components of our interest income and fees during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to ~~aggressively~~the ~~pursue~~three-month ~~quality~~period ~~new~~ended ~~loans~~June 30, ~~both~~2008 ~~interim~~are ~~and~~as ~~permanent.~~ follows:

Results of Operations --- Nine-month period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the Nine-month period ended December 31, 2007

Our revenues are derived from interest income and fees earned on loans as well as, to a lesser degree, interest earned on church bonds and short-term investments. During the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008, interest income and fees decreased by $875,211 (16%) over the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007.

The components of our interest income and fees during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:

Table 1 – Interest Income and Fees

For the Nine-month Period Ended 12/31/08

For the Nine-month Period Ended 12/31/07

Increase (Decrease)

For the Nine-month Period Ended 6/30/09

For the Nine-month Period Ended 6/30/08

Increase (Decrease)

Mortgage loans

$31,~~423~~147,~~076~~521

$31,~~343~~248,~~327~~555

$79(101,~~749~~034)

Interim loans

~~715~~298,~~439~~840

1289,~~505,614~~926

~~(790~~8,~~175)~~914

Commitment fees

~~464~~114,~~120~~956

~~635~~112,~~681~~452

~~(171~~2,~~561)~~504

Other income and fees

~~110~~21,~~838~~246

~~104~~33,~~062~~949

6(12,~~776~~703)

Total

$41,~~713~~582,~~473~~563

$51,~~588,~~684,882

$(~~875~~102,~~211~~319)

~~The~~Total ~~decrease in~~ interest income ~~and fees for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the nine-month period ended December 30, 2007 was primarily attributable to a decrease in the interest income~~ on ~~interim~~mortgage loans~~. The~~ ~~decrease~~and ~~in interest income on~~ interim loans ~~was~~decreased ~~primarily~~slightly ~~attributable to the decrease in our portfolio of interim loans~~ during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 30, ~~2008~~2009 as compared to the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2008. ~~Interim~~The ~~loans~~increase asin ofinterest ~~December~~income ~~31,~~on ~~2007,~~interim ~~net~~loans of ~~deferred commitment fees, were~~ $178,~~030,601~~914 aswas ~~compared~~offset toby ~~$12,402,154 as of December 31, 2008,~~ a decrease of $4101,~~628,447~~034 orin ~~27%. The~~interest ~~interim~~income ~~loan~~on ~~portfolio~~mortgage ~~during~~loans. The ~~each~~decrease ofin ~~the~~interest ~~nine~~income ~~months~~on ~~during~~mortgage ~~the~~loans ~~nine-month~~is ~~period~~due ~~ended December 31, 2007 as compared~~ to ~~each of~~ the ~~nine~~decrease ~~months~~in ~~during~~ the ~~nine-month~~rate ~~period~~of ~~ended~~interest ~~December~~on ~~31,~~such ~~2008~~mortgage ~~are similarly and consistently larger~~loans.

~~Performing~~The ~~interim~~rate ~~loans~~of asinterest on our portfolio of ~~December~~mortgage ~~31,~~loans ~~2008~~and ~~were~~church $bonds was 8.40% as of June 30,~~802,154~~ 2008 as compared to ~~$15,930,601~~7.48% as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2009, a decrease of ~~$7,128,447~~92 ~~(45%)~~basis points.

~~Also~~Our ~~contributing to the decrease in interest income from our~~ portfolio of ~~interim~~performing mortgage loans ~~was~~increased afrom ~~decrease in the interest rate on such portfolio for the nine-month period ended December 31~~$50, ~~2008 as compared to the nine-month period ended December 31~~113,607 ~~2007. The rate of interest on our portfolio of interim loans was 7.50%~~ as of ~~December~~June 3130, 2008 ~~as compared~~ to ~~9.36%~~$58,332,924 as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2009, aan ~~decrease~~increase of ~~186~~$8,219,317 ~~basis~~or ~~points~~16%.

~~Somewhat~~Our ~~offsetting~~total ~~the~~loan ~~decrease~~portfolio inincreased ~~interest income from interim loans and the decrease in commitment fees is the $79,749 increase in interest income in mortgage loans~~ during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 as compared to the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2008. ~~This~~The ~~increase~~following intable ~~interest~~compares ~~income~~our ~~from~~portfolio ~~mortgage~~of loans, isnet ~~primarily~~of ~~attributable~~mortgage todiscounts anand ~~increase~~deferred incommitment ~~performing~~fees, ~~mortgage loans~~ as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 ~~as compared~~ to ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007.~~ 2008:

~~Performing~~Table ~~mortgage~~2 ~~loans~~– ~~increased~~Mortgage ~~from $48~~Loans,~~587,517~~ asChurch ofBonds ~~December~~and ~~31,~~Interim ~~2007~~Loans ~~to $54,908,182~~ as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008,~~2009 inand ~~increase of $6,320,665 or 13%.~~ 2008

The weighted average rate of interest on our portfolio of performing mortgage loans decreased from 8.25% as of December 31, 2007 to 7.76% as of December 31, 2008, a decrease of 49 basis points.


Type of Loan	06/30/09	06/30/08	Increase (Decrease)

Total Mortgage Loans and Church Bonds	$61,722,545	$53,950,204	$ 7,772,341

Total interim loans	18,889,905	12,986,640	5,903,265

Total loan portfolio	$80,612,450	$66,936,844	$13,675,606

Our total loan portfolio decreased during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007. The following table compares our portfolio of loans, net of mortgage discounts and deferred commitment fees, as of December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2007:


Performing Loans	06/30/09	06/30/08	Increase (Decrease)

Performing Mortgage Loans and Church Bonds	$58,332,924	$50,113,607	$ 8,219,317

Performing Interim Loans	15,289,905	11,886,640	3,403,265

Total Performing Loans	$73,622,829	$62,000,247	$11,622,582

-9-

Table 2 – Mortgage Loans, Church Bonds and Interim Loans as of December 31, 2008 and 2007


Non-Performing Loans	06/30/09	06/30/08	Increase (Decrease)

Non-Performing Mortgage Loans and Church Bonds	$3,389,621	$3,836,597	$ (446,976)

Non-Performing Interim Loans	3,600,000	1,100,000	2,500,000

Total Non-Performing Loans	$6,989,621	$4,936,597	$2,053,024

Type of Loan	12/31/08	12/31/07	Increase (Decrease)
Total Mortgage and church bonds	$58,077,429	$53,435,391	$4,642,038
Performing mortgage and church bonds	54,908,182	48,587,517	6,320,665
Total Interim loans	12,402,154	17,030,601	(4,628,447)
Performing interim loans	8,802,154	15,930,601	(7,128,447)
Total loan portfolio	70,479,583	70,465,992	13,591
Total performing loan portfolio	63,710,336	64,518,118	(807,782)

“Non-performing” or “non-accrual” loans as defined by Church Loans are loans that have been classified as either “cash basis” or “capital recovery” (see explanation under “Revenue Recognition” under “Critical Accounting Policies” above).

Our loan portfolio ~~decreased~~increased in ~~eight~~each of the ~~nine~~three months during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 as compared to each of the ~~nine~~three months during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2008. Table 3 below sets forth the month ending values of our loan portfolio, net of mortgage discounts and deferred commitment fees, for each of the ~~nine~~three months during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2008, respectively:

Table 3 – Month-End Portfolio Values

Month	~~2008~~2009	~~2007~~2008	Difference
April	$6779,~~469~~971,~~937~~159	$7567,~~224~~469,~~697~~937	$(712,~~754~~501,~~760)~~222
May	6780,~~605~~350,~~082~~919	7367,~~025~~605,~~212~~082	(512,~~420~~745,~~130)~~837
June	6680,~~936~~612,~~844~~450	7566,~~834~~936,~~245~~845	(813,~~897~~675,~~401)~~605
July	67,442,859	75,574,185	(8,131,326)
Monthly Average:	$80,311,509	$67,337,288	$12,974,221
August	67,615,745	77,199,504	(9,583,759)
September	67,030,510	76,732,462	(9,701,952)
October	66,201,480	75,134,551	(8,933,071)
November	66,827,582	72,905,373	(6,077,791)
December	70,479,583	70,465,992	13,591
Monthly Average:	$67,512,180	$74,677,358	$(7,165,178)

Non-performing loans, church bonds and interim loans increased from $54,~~947~~936,~~875~~597 as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2008 to $6,~~769~~989,~~247~~621 as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009, an increase of $~~821~~2,~~372~~053,024. The accrual of interest on these loans has been discontinued. If interest on these mortgage loans, church bonds and interim loans had been accrued as earned, interest and fees on loans would have been increased by approximately $~~468~~246,000 and $~~346~~36,000 for the ~~nine~~three-month periods ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, respectively. Interest income actually recognized on such loans during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008 was approximately $~~176~~35,000 and $~~128~~61,000, respectively. ~~In addition, impaired loans were approximately $12,257,000 and $14,456,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.~~

~~The~~We ~~weighted~~have ~~average~~seen ~~interest~~an ~~rate~~increase onin ~~all of our~~ loans ~~and~~that ~~church~~are ~~bonds~~in ~~decreased~~default ~~from~~in ~~8.51%~~the asthree-month ofperiod ~~December~~ended ~~31,~~June ~~2007 to 7.72% as of December 31~~30, ~~2008~~2009.. ~~This~~Specific ~~decrease~~information ~~in the weighted average interest rate~~ on ~~all~~ loans ~~contributed~~that toare ~~the decrease~~ in ~~our~~default ~~interest~~as ~~income~~of ~~during~~June ~~the nine-month period ended December 31~~30, ~~2008~~2009 asis ~~compared~~included toin ~~the~~Table ~~nine-month~~4 ~~period~~and ~~ended~~Table ~~December~~5 ~~31, 2007~~below.

~~Also~~Following ~~contributing~~is toa table that provides the ~~decrease~~principal inbalance outstanding, maturity date, interest ~~income~~rate, collateral appraised value and ~~fees~~collateral ~~during~~fair ~~the~~value ~~nine~~on each of our permanent and interim loans designated as either in default or non-~~month~~performing. We ~~period~~consider ~~ended~~a ~~December~~permanent ~~31,~~loan ~~2008~~as “in default” if any required payment of principal or interest is more than 60 days past due and an interim loan is considered as ~~compared~~“in todefault” ~~the~~if ~~nine~~any required payment of principal or interest is more than 90 days past due. “Non-~~month~~performing” ~~period~~loans ~~ended~~are ~~December~~defined 31as loans that have been classified as either “cash basis” or “capital recovery” (see explanation under “Revenue Recognition” under “Critical Accounting Policies” under Item 7, ~~2007~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation). Management’s practice, in reviewing and grading the loan portfolio, is to first compare the ~~decrease~~present inoutstanding ~~commitment~~loan ~~fee~~value ~~income~~to the original appraised value. ~~This~~ If ~~decrease~~the inloan ~~commitment~~to ~~fee~~value ~~income~~ratio on a particular loan is ~~directly~~50% ~~related~~or less, then management does not normally make a further investigation of fair value on the particular collateral. However, if the loan to value ratio is greater than 50%, then management does determine, to the ~~decease~~best inof management’s ability, management’s opinion of the ~~portfolio~~fair value of ~~interim~~the collateral securing the loan. Therefore, fair value is included for loans for which the loan to value ratio, based on the appraised value, is in excess of 50%. Management assumes that for loans with a loan to value ratio, based on appraised value, of 50% or less that the fair value exceeds the outstanding loan balance.

Commitment fees earned during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008 were $464,120 as compared to $635,681 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007, a decrease of $171,561 or 27%.

-10-

~~Net~~Table ~~income~~4 ~~for~~– ~~the~~Information ~~nine-month~~on ~~period~~Loans ~~ended~~in ~~December~~Default ~~31,~~or ~~2008~~Non-Performing ~~was~~as ~~$2,941,786 ($.29 per share), an increase~~ of ~~$422,983~~June ~~(17%) as compared to the nine-month period ended December 31~~30, ~~2007. This increase was primarily attributable to the increase in net interest income and to a decrease in general and administrative expenses.~~2009

Net interest income increased from $3,327,320 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 to $3,724,906 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $397,586 (12%). This increase in our net interest income for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 was the result of a significant decrease in our interest expense.


Loan	Principal Outstanding	Maturity	Rate	Appraised Value of Collateral(1)	Fair Value of Collateral

Greater Life, Baltimore, MD	$ 8,026	11/01/2007	10.50%	$ 76,000	N/A

Holy Trinity, Brooklyn, NY	471,789	03/01/2026	9.50%	1,800,000	N/A

Rhema Word, Chicago, IL (2)	1,290,820	07/01/2025	9.50%	1,850,000	2,250,000

Spiritual Light, Detroit, MI	74,445	11/01/2014	9.75%	185,000	N/A

Global Christian, Richmond, CA (3)	232,414	01/01/2014	9.50%	640,000	N/A

Right Spirit, Spanish Fort, AL (4)	86,378	05/01/2014	9.25%	274,000	N/A

Cathedral of Faith, Tampa, FL	741,402	09/01/2024	6.75%	2,018,000	N/A

Biltmore Group, West Monroe, LA (5)	1,100,000	06/01/2004	7.50%	1,213,000	1,200,000

Love Temple, Memphis, TN (6)	237,576	01/15/2007	5.00%	325,900	325,900

Project Love, Memphis, TN (6)	255,840	01/15/2007	5.00%	43,900	43,900

Igreja Baptista Pompano Beach, FL	262,497	05/01/2025	7.75%	388,000	400,000

Canaan COGIC Memphis, TN (7)	275,433	03/01/2010	8.00%	245,000	74,900

Ministerio International Virginia Gardens, FL	2,500,000	10/01/2008	10.25%	3,900,000	2,800,000

Amarillo Investors Mortgage, Amarillo, TX (8)	697,474	06/10/05	9%	1,887,021	N/A

Mt. Calvary MBC, Ft. Wayne, IN	523,867	12/01/02	9.75%	1,430,000	N/A

FBC, Sayville, Holtsville, NY	611,547	02/01/08	9.25%	2,185,000	N/A

Highland Heights COC, Memphis, TN (9)	73,244	04/09/92	10.5%	492,000	N/A

Word in Action, Houston, TX	751,156	03/01/06	9.5%	1,700,000	N/A

King Solomon MBC, Jackson, TN (10)	294,156	02/01/07	9%	360,000	674,000

Our interest expense decreased from $2,261,364 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 to $988,567 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $1,272,797 or 56%. This decrease in interest expense is the result of a significant decrease in total liabilities and a significant decrease in the weighted average interest rate on our debt.

Our total liabilities decreased from $40,869,443 as of December 31, 2007 to $39,361,500 as of December 31, 2008. The following table illustrates the average month end liabilities during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the same period ended December 31, 2007:

Table 4 - Month End Total Liabilities for Each Month in the Nine-month Period Ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007

Month	2008	2007	Difference
April	$37,441,086	$45,880,132	$(8,439,046)
May	37,192,614	43,493,942	(6,301,328)
June	36,511,926	46,224,751	(9,712,825)
July	36,630,689	45,594,147	(8,963,458)
August	36,549,535	46,869,209	(10,319,674)
September	35,966,008	46,219,185	(10,253,177)
October	32,690,582	43,530,628	(10,840,046)
November	33,075,297	41,119,221	(8,043,924)
December	39,361,500	40,869,443	(1,507,943)
Monthly Average:	$36,157,693	$44,422,295	$(8,264,602)

The weighted average interest rate on our debt decreased from 6.35% as of December 31, 2007 to 2.86% as of December 31, 2008. This decrease is directly related to the decrease in the Prime Rate and LIBOR. See Inflation on page 15 for a discussion on how these rates affect our expenses.

General and administrative expenses decreased from $1,197,693 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 to $746,122 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $451,571 or 38%. This decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to decrease in expenses relating to property held as a result of the foreclosure of defaulted loans.

Other income decreased from $548,576 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 to $116,202 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $432,374. Contributing to the large amount of other income for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 was the recognition of gain of $508,555 from the sale of property located in Bronx, NY that was obtained through foreclosure of a defaulted loan.

Net income for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was diminished by an addition to the provision for credit losses recognized during such periods of $95,000 and $125,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2008, there were 10,217,094 shares of certificates of beneficial interest outstanding. Net income per share increased from $.25 per share for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to $.29 per share for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008. This increase was attributable to the increase in our net income discussed above.

Results of Operations—Three-month period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to three-month period ended December 31, 2007

-11-

During the three-month period ended December 31, 2008, interest income and fees decreased by $311,541 (17%) over the three-month period ended December 31, 2007.



Promise Land Ministries, Memphis, TN (11)	269,114	02/01/07	7.5%	355,000	360,000

Fountain of Praise, Trenton, NJ (12)	183,567	07/01/04	6%	275,000	275,000

King Jesus Worship Center, Winnsboro, LA	641,091	02/27/04	6%	1,600,000	N/A

~~The~~(1) ~~components~~Except ofas ~~our~~noted, ~~interest~~appraised ~~income~~value ~~and~~is ~~fees~~at ~~during~~or about the ~~three-month~~date ~~period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to~~ the ~~three-month~~loan ~~period~~was ~~ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:~~made.

~~Table~~(2) 5The –collateral ~~Interest~~consists ~~Income~~of two separate properties. The appraised value of one property is based upon an appraisal dated April 12, 2005 of $750,000. The second property was appraised on July 21, 2004 at $1,100,000. The church has entered into a contract for sale of the second property dated January 2009 that provides for a purchase price of $1,500,000. Therefore, the combined appraised value of the properties securing the loan is $1,850,000 and, ~~Fees~~based upon the contract of sale, the fair value of the properties securing the loan is approximately $2,250,000.

	For the Three-month Period Ended 12/31/08		For the Three-month Period Ended 12/31/07		Increase (Decrease)
Mortgage loans		$1,096,432		$1,128,741		$(32,309)
Interim loans		200,201		467,865		(267,664)
Commitment fees		230,142		238,170		(8,028)
Other income and fees		33,381		36,921		(3,540)
Total		$1,560,156		$1,871,697		$(311,541)

(3) Appraised value of the collateral is based on the most recent appraisal dated May 25, 2001.

~~Interest~~(4) ~~income~~The onraw ~~mortgage~~land ~~loans~~securing ~~decreased~~this ~~from~~loan ~~$1,128,741~~was ~~during~~appraised ~~the~~at ~~three-month period ended December 31, 2007 to~~ $184,~~096,432~~000 ~~during~~and the ~~three-month~~appraised ~~period~~value ~~ended December 31, 2008, a decrease~~ of ~~$32,309 (3%). Interest income on interim loans decreased from $467,865 during~~ the ~~three-month~~collateral ~~period~~with ~~ended~~improvements ~~December~~is ~~31, 2007 to~~ $~~200~~274,~~201 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $267,664 (57%)~~000.

~~Commitment~~(5) ~~fees~~Church ~~earned~~Loans ~~during~~recently ~~the~~obtained ~~three-month~~new ~~period~~appraisals ~~ended~~of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~properties ~~2007~~securing asthis ~~compared~~loan. toThese ~~December~~appraisals ~~31,~~contained ~~2008~~a ~~decreased~~range of value from $~~238~~844,~~170~~500 to $~~230~~1,~~142~~213, ~~a decrease of $8,028 or 3%~~000.

~~The~~(6) ~~decrease~~These two loans were also purchased from Regions Bank in ~~interest~~2007. ~~income~~The loans are made to related entities and ~~fees~~the ~~for~~loans are secured by four separate properties. It is our understanding that the ~~three~~loans are cross-~~month~~collateralized. ~~period~~There ~~ended~~were ~~December~~no ~~31,~~appraisals ~~2008~~of asthe ~~compared~~properties toin the ~~three-month~~loan ~~period~~files ~~ended~~obtained ~~December~~from ~~31,~~Regions ~~2007~~Bank. isAppraised ~~attributable~~value tofor the ~~decrease~~collateral listed in ~~our~~the ~~portfolio~~table is the 20098 Tax Appraisal from the tax office of ~~interim~~Shelby ~~loans~~County, ~~and~~Tennessee. Due to the ~~decrease~~acquisition of these loans from Regions Bank, Church Loans’ carrying value in ~~average~~these ~~interest~~loans ~~rate~~is less than the principal balance owing on ~~our~~the loans. asChurch ~~discussed~~Loans’ ~~above~~carrying value in these loans is a total of $185,946 which results in a loan to value ratio of 50%.

~~Our net income for the three-month period ended December 31, 2008 was $1,142,157~~ (~~$.11 per share~~7), anFair ~~increase~~value ofis ~~$214,126~~based ~~(23%)~~upon ~~as compared to~~ the ~~three-month~~Shelby ~~period~~County ~~ended~~Tax ~~December~~Assessor’s ~~31,~~2009 ~~2007~~appraisal. ~~This~~ ~~increase~~Carrying ~~was~~value ~~attributable~~of tothis aloan ~~decrease~~is ~~in our interest expense and a decrease in general and administrative expenses~~$174,962.

~~The~~(8) ~~decrease~~Appraised invalue ~~interest~~is ~~income~~based ~~and~~upon ~~fees for~~ the ~~three-month~~Potter ~~period~~Randall ~~ended~~County ~~December~~Appraisal ~~31,~~District’s ~~2008~~2009 asvaluation ~~compared~~of to the ~~three-month~~properties ~~period~~securing ~~ended December 31, 2007 was significantly offset by a decrease in interest expense. Interest expense for~~ the ~~three-month period ended December 31, 2007 was $682,180 as compared to $272,110 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $410,070 or 60%~~loan.

~~The~~(9) ~~decrease~~Carrying invalue ~~interest expense was attributable to a decrease in liabilities and a decrease in the weighted average interest rates on our debt. See Table 4 above for the month-end liabilities for each~~ of ~~the~~this ~~three~~loan ~~months~~is ~~during the three-month periods ending December 31~~$65, ~~2008 and 2007, respectively~~861.

~~The~~(10) ~~weighted~~Carrying ~~average~~value ~~interest rate on all~~ of ~~our~~this ~~debt~~loan ~~for~~is ~~each~~$253,197. Fair ofvalue ~~the~~is ~~three~~based ~~months~~on ~~during~~ the ~~three-month~~Madison ~~periods~~County ~~ending~~Tax ~~December~~Assessor’s ~~31, 2008 and 2007, were as follows:~~appraisal.

~~Table~~(11) 6Appraised –value ~~Weighted~~and ~~Average~~fair ~~Interest~~value ~~Rates~~is onbased ~~Debt~~upon ~~For Each of~~ the ~~Three~~Shelby ~~Months~~County ~~During~~Tax ~~the~~Assessor’s ~~Periods~~2009 ~~Ending~~valuation ~~December~~of ~~31,~~the ~~2008 and December 31, 2007~~property.

Month	2008	2007	Difference
October	3.83%	6.60%	(2.77%)
November	2.84%	6.27%	(3.43%)
December	2.86%	6.35%	(3.49%)

(12) This property was acquired by Church Loans through a foreclosure of a previous loan held by Church Loans and then sold to the Borrower in 2004 for $275,000. The appraised value and fair value are based upon such sales price.

Therefore, even though interest income decreased significantly during the three-month period ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the three-month period ended December 31, 2007, as a result of the significant decrease in

-12-

~~interest~~Table ~~expense,~~5 ~~net~~below ~~interest~~provides ~~income~~information ~~actually~~relative ~~increased from $1,189,517 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007~~ to ~~$1,288,046~~action ~~for~~being ~~the~~taken ~~three-month~~on ~~period~~loans ~~ended~~in ~~December~~default ~~31,~~as ~~2008, an increase~~ of ~~$98~~June 30,~~529~~ ~~(8%)~~2009.

~~Other~~Table ~~income~~5 ~~increased from $12,773 for the three~~-~~month~~ ~~period~~Specific ~~ended~~Information ~~December~~Relating ~~31, 2007~~ to ~~$97,076~~Loans ~~for~~in ~~the~~Default ~~three~~and Non-~~month~~Performing ~~period~~Loans ~~ended~~as ~~December 31, 2008, an increase~~ of ~~$84,303. This~~June ~~was the result of a gain of $76~~30,~~076~~ ~~on the sale of other real estate owned.~~2009:

General and administrative expenses decreased from $262,659 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2007 to $222,565 for the three-month period ended December 31, 2008, a decrease of $40,094 or 15%. This decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in expenses related to the property obtained through foreclosures.

Loan

Principal Outstanding

Foreclosure Action Taken

Greater Life, Baltimore, MD

$ 8,026

None. Balance is small. Staff is pursuing normal collection efforts..

Holy Trinity, Brooklyn, NY

471,789

None. Church is making payments and is staying within 90-120 days of being current. Debt is well secured

Rhema Word, Chicago, IL

1,290,820

None. Church is making payments. Debt is well secured. Church is trying to sell one of its properties to reduce debt and debt service.

Spiritual Light, Detroit, MI

74,445

None. Church is making payments. Balance is relatively small. Staff continues make normal collection efforts.

Global Christian, Richmond, CA

232,414

None. Church is making payments. Staff continues to monitor.

Right Spirit, Spanish Fort, AL

86,378

None. Church is making payments. Staff continues to monitor and make collection efforts as needed.

Cathedral of Faith, Tampa, FL

741,402

Litigation has been authorized to obtain insurance settlement proceeds and foreclose the property. In dispute with public adjustor regarding insurance settlement.

Love Temple, Memphis, TN

237,576

Litigation pending involving this loan, arising out of a dispute within the church. We have cross-claimed for foreclosure.

Project Love, Memphis, TN

255,840

Litigation pending involving this loan, arising out of a dispute within the church. We have cross-claimed for foreclosure.

Canaan COGIC, Memphis, TN

275,433

None, but legal action is presently being considered.

Igreja Batista, Pompano Beach, FL

262,497

None. Staff is reviewing this situation to determine necessary action.

Biltmore Group, West Monroe, LA

1,100,000

Foreclosure has been initiated and is pending.

Ministerio Intl., Virginia Gardens, FL

2,500,000

Foreclosure has been initiated and is pending.

Amarillo Investors Mortgage,

Amarillo, TX

697,474

None. Borrower is attempting to sell some of the collateral and reduce the loan balance. Borrower is past due 2 payments.

Mt. Calvary MBC,

Ft. Wayne, IN

523,867

None. Borrower is 2 payments past due. Staff is monitoring. Church is doing fund raising campaign to resolve.

FBC, Sayville,

Holtsville, NY

611,547

None. Church made payment on July 1 and is now only 1 payment behind.

Highland Heights COC,

Memphis, TN

73,244

None. Church made payment July 9 and is now 2 payments past due. Staff is monitoring.

Word in Action,

Houston, TX

751,156

None. Staff is making normal collection efforts at this time. Borrower is 3 payments behind.

~~As of December 31, 2008, 10,217,094 shares of certificates of beneficial interest were outstanding. Net income per share increased from $.09 per share for the three~~-~~month period ended December 31, 2007 to $0.11 per share for the three~~13-~~month ended December 31, 2008.~~

Financial Condition—December 31, 2008 as compared to March 31, 2008.

King Solomon MBC,

Jackson, TN

294,156

None. Staff is making normal collection efforts. Borrower is 3 payments behind.

Promise Land Ministries,

Memphis, TN

269,114

None. Church is making payments. Staff is monitoring.

Fountain of Praise,

Trenton, NJ

183,567

Borrower filed bankruptcy. Chapter 11 Plan has been confirmed. Borrower is to pay $9923 in arrears in 38 months at 6% interest and is to pay the balance per the note beginning September 15, 2009.

King Jesus Worship Center,

Winnsboro, LA

641,091

None. Borrower is making regular payments. Staff continues to monitor. Borrower is 3 payments behind.

Our ~~portfolio~~allowance offor ~~performing~~credit ~~mortgage~~losses ~~loans~~actually ~~and~~decreased ~~church bonds increased~~ from $501,~~389~~786,~~558~~477 as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2008 to $541,~~908~~676,~~182~~760 as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009. ~~Our~~The ~~portfolio~~allowance for credit losses is based on an amount that is adequate in the opinion of ~~performing~~the ~~interim~~Audit ~~loans~~Committee, ~~decreased~~based ~~during~~upon input from management, to absorb losses inherent in the ~~nine~~existing loan portfolio. This evaluation includes a review of a quarterly grading methodology performed by management on impaired loans. Impaired loans include non-~~month~~performing ~~period~~loans, ~~ended~~which ~~December~~have 31been placed on non-accrual status. At June 30, 2009 and 2008 ~~from~~impaired loans were approximately $1113,~~611~~931,~~879~~674and to $810,~~802~~506,~~154~~312, respectively. ~~Mortgage~~Impaired loans, ~~interim~~include non-performing loans and ~~church~~other ~~bonds,~~loans ~~including~~deemed by management to be impaired that were not classified as non-performing. Our ~~mortgage~~average investment in non-performing loans was $6,989,621 ~~church~~and ~~bonds~~$4,936,597 for the three-month periods ending June 30, 2009 and ~~interim~~June ~~loans~~30, ~~held~~2008, byrespectively. Although usthere ~~increased~~was an increase in the allowance for credit losses during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 of $50,000, the allowance for credit losses has decreased from $671,~~932~~786,~~287~~477 as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2008 to $701,~~479~~676,~~583~~760 as of ~~December~~June 3130, 2009. See Table 6 for the activity in the allowance for credit losses since June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. This decrease reflects changes in the portfolio of existing loans. In other words, based on the quarterly grading methodology performed by management and reviewed by the Audit Committee, it is our opinion that although there is an increase in impaired loans, the allowance for credit losses decreased as of $2June 30,~~547,296~~ ~~(4%)~~2009 due to the lower risk of loss in the portfolio.

~~Nonperforming~~In ~~mortgage~~calculating ~~loans,~~our ~~church~~reserve ~~bonds~~for ~~and~~credit ~~interim~~losses, ~~loans~~we ~~increased~~take ~~from~~into ~~$5,930,850~~account asprobable ofcredit ~~March~~losses ~~31,~~inherent ~~2008~~in tothe ~~$6,769,247~~remaining asportion of ~~December~~our ~~31,~~loan ~~2008~~portfolio. ~~Total~~ In ~~performing~~calculating ~~mortgage~~the ~~loans~~allowance, ~~church~~1% ~~bonds~~of ~~and~~the ~~interim~~outstanding ~~loans~~balance ~~increased~~of ~~from~~its ~~$62,001,437~~loan asportfolio of ~~March~~permanent ~~31,~~and ~~2008~~interim tomortgage ~~$63,710,336~~loans asthat ofhave ~~December~~not ~~31,~~been ~~2008,~~identified anas ~~increase~~impaired ofis ~~$1,708,899~~reserved for. ~~Consistent~~In ~~with the increase in loans~~addition, ~~total~~2% ~~assets~~of ~~increased~~the ~~from~~outstanding ~~$68,856,323~~balance as of ~~March~~half ~~31,~~of ~~2008~~our tochurch ~~$69,910,607~~bonds asis ofreserved ~~December~~for ~~31,~~and ~~2008,~~ an ~~increase~~additional ~~of $1,054,284 (2~~50%~~). Impaired~~ ~~loans~~of ~~were~~the ~~$12,257,224~~remaining athalf ~~December~~of ~~31,~~our ~~2008~~church asbonds ~~compared~~is toreserved ~~approximately $11,639,000 at March 31, 2008~~for.

The ~~allowance~~amount ~~for~~of ~~credit~~loans ~~losses~~in ~~was~~default ~~$1,551,760~~has atincreased ~~December~~from 31June 30, 2008 ~~as compared~~ to ~~$1,786,477~~June ~~at March 31~~30, ~~2008~~2009. ~~The~~ We ~~allowance~~believe ~~for~~that ~~credit~~this ~~losses~~ is ~~based~~somewhat ~~on an amount that is adequate in~~ the ~~opinion~~result of the ~~Audit~~current ~~Committee,~~economic ~~based upon input from management, to absorb losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio~~environment. ~~This evaluation includes a review of a quarterly grading methodology performed by management on impaired loans.~~ ~~Impaired~~We ~~loans~~intend ~~include~~to ~~non-performing~~continue ~~loans,~~to ~~which~~closely ~~have~~monitor ~~been~~our ~~placed on non-accrual status. At December 31, 2008, impaired~~ loans ~~were~~in ~~$12,257,224~~default ~~as compared to $11,639,063 at March 31, 2008~~ and ~~non-performing~~will ~~loans~~increase ~~were~~our ~~$6,769,247~~reserve ~~at December 31, 2008~~ as ~~compared to $5,930,850 at March 31, 2008~~necessary. ~~Although~~Management ~~impaired~~and ~~loans~~the ~~have~~Board ~~increased~~of ~~slightly~~Trust ~~from~~Managers ~~March~~review ~~31, 2008,~~ the ~~allowance~~loans ~~has decreased reflecting changes~~ in ~~the~~default ~~portfolio.~~each month. The ~~allowance~~Audit atCommittee ~~March~~reviews ~~31,~~and ~~2008~~adjusts, ~~reflects~~as ~~three impaired loans totaling $1~~necessary,~~205,426~~ ~~with an allowance reserve of approximately $400,000, which have subsequently paid off and are not reflected in~~ the allowance for credit losses ateach ~~December 31, 2008~~quarter.

~~Our~~Table ~~liabilities~~6 ~~increased~~– ~~from~~Activities ~~$37,673,019~~in asthe ofAllowance ~~March~~for ~~31,~~Credit ~~2008 to $39,361,500 as of December 31, 2008.~~ Losses

Shareholders’ equity decreased by $634,197 from March 31, 2008 to December 31, 2008. This is attributable to the decrease in undistributed net income from $1,437,503 as of March 31, 2008 to $803,306 as of December 31, 2008.



		June 30, 2008 balance				$1,786,477

		Increases during the quarter				95,000

		Charge offs during the quarter				(329,717)

		September 30, 2008 balance				1,551,760

		Increases during the quarter				-0-

		Charge offs during the quarter				-0-

		December 31, 2008 balance				1,551,760

		Increases during the quarter				75,000

-14-



		Charge offs during the quarter				-0-

		March 31, 2009 balance				1,626,760

		Increases during the quarter				50,000

		Charge offs during the quarter				-0-

		June 30 2009 balance				$1,676,760

As noted above and in Table 6, we increased the allowance for credit losses during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 by $50,000.

As of June 30, 2009, Church Loans also held church bonds with a carrying value of $58,933 which were in default.

The weighted average interest rate on our loans and church bonds decreased from 8.40% as of June 30, 2008 to 7.48% as of June 30, 2009. This decrease in the weighted average interest rate on our loans was primarily responsible for the decrease in our interest income during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2008.

Commitment fees earned during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 were $114,956 as compared to $112,452 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, an increase of $2,504 or 2%.

Net income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 was $847,432 ($.08 per share), a decrease of $178,521 (17%) as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease in net interest income.

Net interest income decreased from $1,323,022 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 to $1,143,704 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $179,318 (14%). This decrease in our net interest income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 was the result of a decrease in interest income and fees and an increase in our interest expense.

Our total liabilities increased from $36,511,926 as of June 30, 2008 to $48,640,300 as of June 30, 2009. The weighted average interest rate on our debt decreased from 3.83% as of June 30, 2008 to 3.73% as of June 30, 2009. Our interest expense increased from $361,860 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 to $438,859 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $76,999 or 21%. This increase is attributable to the increase in liabilities.

The following table illustrates the average month end liabilities during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period ended June 30, 2008:

Table 7 - Month End Total Liabilities for Each Month in the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008


Month	2009	2008	Difference

April	$48,385,780	$37,441,086	$10,944,694
May	48,309,678	37,192,614	11,117,064
June	48,640,299	36,511,926	12,128,373

Monthly Average:	$48,445,252	$37,048,542	$11,396,710

-15-

The following table provides a schedule of maturity dates and the principal amounts maturing for our debt:

Table 8 - Maturity Dates of Month End Liabilities for Each Month in the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2009


Month	Total Liabilities	Maturing 1-31-12	Demand/Current
April	$48,385,780	$26,440,000	$21,945,780
May	48,309,678	26,815,000	21,494,678
June	48,640,299	27,315,000	21,325,299

General and administrative expenses decreased from $284,955 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 to $246,556 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $38,399 or 13%.

Other income increased from $6,886 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 to $19,184 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $12,298.

As of June 30, 2009, there were 10,217,094 shares of certificates of beneficial interest outstanding. Net income per share decreased from $.10 per share for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $.08 per share for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009. This decrease was attributable to the decrease in our net income discussed above.

Financial Condition—Three-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to year ended March 31, 2009.

Our portfolio of performing mortgage loans and church bonds increased from $55,512,158 as of March 31, 2009 to $58,332,924 as of June 30, 2009. Our portfolio of performing interim loans decreased during the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 from $16,686,014 to $15,289,905. Mortgage loans, interim loans and church bonds, including non-performing mortgage loans, church bonds and interim loans, held by us increased from $78,945,652 as of March 31, 2009 to $80,612,450 as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $1,666,798 (2%).

Nonperforming mortgage loans, church bonds and interim loans increased from $6,747,480 as of March 31, 2009 to $6,989,621 as of June 30, 2009. Total performing mortgage loans, church bonds and interim loans increased from $72,198,172 as of March 31, 2009 to $73,622,829 as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $1,424,657. Consistent with the increase in loans, total assets increased from $78,315,575 as of March 31, 2009 to $79,975,435 as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $1,659,860 (2%). Impaired loans were approximately $13,931,674 at June 30, 2009 as compared to approximately $12,710,000 at March 31, 2009.

Our liabilities increased from $47,214,845 as of March 31, 2009 to $48,640,300 as of June 30, 2009.

Shareholders’ equity increased by $234,405 from March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009. This is attributable to the increase in undistributed net income from $1,354,929 as of March 31, 2009 to $1,589,334 as of June 30, 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including the repayment of borrowings by us, fund loan commitments, maintain investments and meet our general business expenses and needs. Additionally, to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income.

We are engaged primarily in the business of making permanent and interim loans to churches and other non-profit organizations, and to other borrowers, including businesses engaged in the building and operation of assisted living centers. Our assets primarily consist of our loan portfolio, real estate acquired through foreclosure and our office building and facilities.

Our operating expenses are comprised of the maintenance of our office building, the payment of the salaries of our management and support staff, office expenses, fees paid to the Board of Trust Managers, and the payment for legal and accounting services. Substantially all of our assets are invested in the permanent and interim loans. Our only potential liquidity problems relate to the timely and proper repayment of the leveraged funds we have borrowed to make loans in excess of our capital and the ability to fund loan commitments which totaled approximately $8,138,754 at June 30, 2009.

-1316-

make loans in excess of our capital and the ability to fund loan commitments.

Our primary sources of funds for liquidity consist of cash reserves, net cash provided by operations, payments received from the loans comprising our loan portfolio, and funds available through debt financing, including our line of credit agreement with the Amarillo National Bank.

Our level of liquidity based upon cash and cash equivalents decreased by $2689,~~517~~000 during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, 2009 as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 leaving us with cash and cash equivalents of $83116,~~470~~564 as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009. During this same period, we invested $157,~~704~~256,~~362~~643 in mortgage and interim construction loans using net cash provided by operating activities in the amount of $2795,~~472~~681,~~645,~~ principal payments received on our loan portfolio in the amount of $135,~~218~~697,~~039~~759, ~~the proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned of $1,811,726,~~ and $227,~~996~~475,~~518~~397 in borrowing on master notes and our line of credit. The total liquidity available to invest in mortgage and interim construction loans was reduced by $~~715~~613,~~197~~026 paid in cash dividends during the ~~nine~~three-month period ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 and the reduction in our borrowings on our bank line of credit and Master Note ~~Agreements~~agreements in the amount of $246,~~105~~098,~~886~~299.

Our primary debt obligations consist of our bank line of credit owing to Amarillo National Bank and Master Note Agreements with various persons. Pursuant to our January 31, ~~2006~~2009 loan agreement with the bank, we have a $3549,000,000 line of credit for a term of three years, maturing ~~December 31, 2008. This line of credit was extended pursuant to an agreement with the bank dated December 31, 2008 for one month ending~~ January 31, ~~2009. On January 31, 2009, we entered into a new Loan Agreement with Amarillo National Bank for a three-year term ending January 31,~~ 2012 ~~and increasing the line of credit to $49,000,000~~.

As of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009, our total liabilities outstanding were $3948,~~361~~640,~~500~~300. The amount owing on the line of credit as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 was $1627,~~015~~315,000. ~~As mentioned, the January 31, 2006 loan agreement with Amarillo National Bank was renewed and extended into a new loan agreement dated January 31, 2009.~~ It is anticipated that the ~~January~~line ~~31,~~of ~~2009~~credit ~~loan agreement~~ will be renewed at the expiration of its three-year term ~~ending January 31, 2012~~. In the event that the bank elects not to renew the line of credit, we may, under the terms of the loan agreement, retire the line of credit over a period of time, not to exceed five years, equal to the weighted average remaining term of a pool of our real estate lien notes which would be pledged to secure the remaining balance of the bank line of credit.

AtAs ~~December~~of 31June 30, ~~2008~~2009, ~~loans~~pursuant to usthe ~~under~~credit ~~Master~~agreement ~~Note~~with ~~Agreements~~Amarillo National Bank dated January 31, ~~which~~2009, ~~are~~Church Loans has one note owing to Amarillo National Bank. The interest rate on this credit facility adjusts in ~~effect~~accordance ~~demand~~with ~~notes~~the lesser of the 30-day, ~~totaled~~90-day or 180-day London Interbank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”) plus 2.50% or the J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. prime rate as selected on the applicable adjustment dates by Church Loans and with an interest rate floor of 4%. As of June 30, 2009, the balance owing on this note was $2027,~~316~~315,~~023~~000. InThe note owing to Amarillo National Bank made pursuant to a new Loan Agreement was entered into with the ~~past~~bank effective January 31, we2009 ~~have~~(“the ~~utilized~~2009 ~~our~~Loan ~~bank~~Agreement”) ~~line~~for a term of ~~credit~~three ~~and~~years ending January 31, 2012. The rate of interest owing on the ~~principal~~obligation ~~paid~~owing to usthe ~~upon~~bank ~~our~~as ~~outstanding~~of ~~loan~~June ~~portfolio~~30, in2009 ~~order~~was to4.0%, ~~meet~~not ~~our~~including ~~maturing~~the ~~obligations~~non-use fee.

~~Although~~The ~~our~~amounts ~~cash~~owing ~~and~~to ~~cash~~Amarillo ~~equivalents~~National asBank ofare ~~December~~secured ~~31,~~by ~~2008 were only $83,470,~~ the ~~balance~~portfolio ~~which~~of ~~could~~loans beheld ~~borrowed~~ by usChurch ~~upon~~Loans. Church ~~our~~Loans ~~bank~~may ~~line~~borrow ofup ~~credit~~to ~~as of December 31, 2008 was~~ $1849,~~985~~000,000~~. The~~ ~~principal~~pursuant ~~payments scheduled~~ to bethe ~~received~~2009 ~~on our~~ loan ~~portfolio~~agreement ~~for~~subject ~~the~~to ~~fiscal~~a ~~year~~borrowing ~~ending~~base ~~December~~calculation ~~31,~~limit ~~2009~~equal ~~are~~to ~~$14,779,231. Assuming~~85% ~~all~~ of ~~these~~the ~~scheduled~~ principal ~~payments are received, these payments, together with the~~ balance ~~available~~outstanding ~~to us on our bank line~~ of ~~credit~~the ~~after~~performing ~~its~~mortgage ~~recent~~loans ~~extension~~and tochurch ~~$49,000,000,~~bonds ~~should~~held ~~provide~~by usChurch ~~with~~Loans ~~sufficient~~and ~~funds~~50% toof ~~meet~~the ~~our~~principal ~~maturing~~balance ~~obligations~~outstanding ~~and~~of ~~fund loan commitments without~~ the ~~necessity~~performing ofinterim ~~borrowing~~loans ~~funds~~held ~~from~~by ~~other~~Church ~~sources~~Loans. ~~Based~~Pursuant ~~upon~~to ~~our~~that ~~success~~borrowing inbase ~~obtaining~~calculation, ~~borrowings~~Church ~~in the past~~Loans, weas ~~are~~of ~~confident~~June ~~that~~30, ~~should it be necessary~~2009, wecould ~~will~~borrow beup ~~able~~ to ~~obtain additional bank financing in~~ the ~~future~~entire in$49,000,000 ~~sufficient~~line ~~amounts for us to timely meet all~~ of ~~our obligations~~credit.

~~Should~~Pursuant ~~all~~to the ~~scheduled~~loan ~~principal~~agreement ~~payments~~with ~~upon~~Amarillo ~~loans~~National ~~not be received~~Bank, ~~and should~~ we bemust ~~unable~~also tomaintain ~~borrow~~stockholder’s ~~against~~equity ~~our line~~ of ~~credit, and should borrowings from other sources~~ not beless ~~available,~~than ~~it would be necessary to sell a portion of our mortgage loan portfolio in order to meet all of our financial obligations. At December 31~~$18, ~~2008~~000,000, ~~the principal balance of~~ our ~~loan~~total ~~and~~indebtedness ~~church~~shall ~~bond~~not ~~portfolio~~exceed ~~was~~250% ~~$70,479,583, net~~ of ~~unamortized~~our ~~purchase~~stockholder’s ~~discounts~~equity and ~~deferred commitment fees. The weighted average interest rate on loans and church bonds was 7.72% per annum. In view of~~ the ~~normal~~ratio ~~marketability~~ of ~~conventional~~earnings ~~loans,~~before wededuction ~~might be required to discount a majority~~ of ~~these loans in order for them to be attractive for purchase. The principal amount of these loans if discounted to yield a weighted average~~ interest ~~rate of 12%, 14%~~ and ~~16%~~taxes ~~would~~as becompared ~~$45,341,864, $38,864,457, and $34,006,400, respectively. There is no assurance that we would be able~~ to ~~sell~~interest ~~all,~~expense orshall anot ~~portion of, our portfolio of loans, in which event, it would~~ be ~~necessary~~less tothan ~~secure a loan, or loans, from a lender in order to meet our financial obligations~~1. ~~There is no assurance that we would be able to secure a loan in such instance~~2. We ~~have~~As ~~sold only one~~ of ~~our~~June ~~loans in our mortgage loan portfolio and~~30, ~~therefore~~2009, ~~have~~we ~~limited~~were ~~experience~~ in ~~this~~compliance ~~area. Furthermore,~~with ifthese ~~required to discount our loans to yield a weighted average interest rate in excess of 13~~requirements.~~82%, then we would not realize sufficient funds from the sale of the loans to retire all of our debt.~~

~~Principal~~At ~~payments~~June ~~scheduled~~30, 2009, loans to beus ~~received~~under ~~upon~~Master ~~our~~Note ~~permanent~~Agreements, ~~loan~~which ~~portfolio~~are ~~during~~in ~~the~~effect ~~twelve-month~~demand ~~period~~notes, ~~ending~~totaled ~~December~~$20,940,235. As 31of June 30, 2009, ifChurch ~~not~~Loans ~~used~~had to88 ~~fund~~Master ~~new~~Note ~~loan~~Agreements ~~commitments~~with 41 different parties. The rate of interest on these Master Notes is at the Wall Street Journal prime rate of interest less 1.25% with an interest rate floor of 3% effective as of February 1, ~~would~~2009. As beof ~~used~~June to30, ~~reduce~~2009, ~~our~~the ~~outstanding~~rate ~~indebtedness~~of interest on these Master Notes was 3.00%. ~~Should~~All weof ~~use~~these Master Notes are due on demand except that without the ~~payments~~consent of ~~principal~~Church ~~which~~Loans ~~shall~~a benoteholder ~~received~~may ~~upon~~not ~~our~~demand ~~loan~~payment ~~portfolio~~of tomore ~~reduce~~than ~~our~~$250,000 during any 30 day period. These Master Notes are unsecured.

~~-14-~~The loan agreement with Amarillo National Bank does provide that it is an event of default under such agreement if Church Loans defaults in the payment of any other indebtedness. Therefore, a default by Church Loans in the payment or performance of a Master Note would be a technical event of default in Church Loans’ agreement with the bank.

outstanding indebtedness, our interest expense will decrease. In such instance, whether the decrease in the interest income will exceed, or be less than, the decrease in the interest expense will largely be dependent upon the prime rate of interest prevailing at such time due to the fact that the interest to be earned upon our mortgage loan portfolio is generally based upon a fixed rate of interest or a variable rate of interest that periodically reprices, while the interest to be paid upon our outstanding debts is directly, or indirectly, tied to the prime rate of interest charged by major banks.-17-

~~Pursuant~~In to the ~~loan agreement with the bank~~past, we have ~~pledged~~utilized ~~all of~~ our ~~mortgage loans, church bonds and interim construction loans to the~~ bank ~~to secure the~~ line of credit~~. The~~ ~~amount owing on the line of credit must not exceed an amount equal to 85% of the outstanding principal amount of the performing mortgage loans~~ and ~~church bonds and 50% of~~ the ~~outstanding~~ principal ~~amount~~paid ~~of the performing interim construction loans. Applying that borrowing limit~~ to ~~our~~us ~~loan~~upon portfolio as of December 31, 2008, we can borrow up to the entire $35,000,000 line of credit limit on the January 31, 2006 loan agreement and up to the entire $49,000,000 line of credit limit on the January 31, 2009 loan agreement. However, during the term of the loan agreement, we would not have the right to sell our ~~loans,~~outstanding ~~without the bank’s consent, since all of our loans have been pledged to the bank to secure the line of credit. Therefore, under our~~ loan ~~agreement,~~portfolio itin ~~will~~order ~~be very difficult, if not impossible,~~ to ~~sell our loans to~~ meet our ~~financial~~maturing obligations.

Although our cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2009 were only $116,564, the balance which could be borrowed by us upon our bank line of credit as of June 30, 2009 was $21,685,000. The principal payments scheduled to be received on our loan portfolio for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 are $21,546,679. Assuming all of these scheduled principal payments are received, these payments, together with the balance available to us on our bank line of credit, would not provide us with sufficient funds to meet our maturing obligations and fund loan commitments without the necessity of borrowing funds from other sources. Based upon our success in obtaining borrowings in the past, we are confident that, should it be necessary, we will be able to obtain additional bank financing in the future in sufficient amounts for us to timely meet all of our obligations.

Should all the scheduled principal payments upon loans not be received, and should we be unable to borrow against our line of credit, and should borrowings from other sources not be available, it would be necessary to sell a portion of our mortgage loan portfolio in order to meet all of our financial obligations. At June 30, 2009, the principal balance of our loan and church bond portfolio was $80,612,450, net of unamortized purchase discounts and deferred commitment fees. The weighted average interest rate on loans and church bonds was 7.48% per annum. In view of the normal marketability of conventional loans, we might be required to discount a majority of these loans in order for them to be attractive for purchase. The principal amount of these loans if discounted to yield a weighted average interest rate of 8%, 10% and 12% would be $75,372,641, $60,298,110, and $50,248,425, respectively. There is no assurance that we would be able to sell all, or a portion of, our portfolio of loans, in which event, it would be necessary to secure a loan, or loans, from a lender in order to meet our financial obligations. There is no assurance that we would be able to secure a loan in such instance. We have sold only one of our loans in our mortgage loan portfolio and, therefore, have limited experience in this area. Furthermore, if required to discount our loans in excess of 12.4%, then we would not realize sufficient funds from the sale of the loans to retire all of our debt.

Principal payments scheduled to be received upon our permanent loan portfolio during the twelve-month period ending June 30, 2010, if not used to fund new loan commitments, would be used to reduce our outstanding indebtedness. Should we use the payments of principal which shall be received upon our loan portfolio to reduce our outstanding indebtedness, our interest expense will decrease. In such instance, whether the decrease in the interest income will exceed, or be less than, the decrease in the interest expense will largely be dependent upon the prime rate of interest prevailing at such time due to the fact that the interest to be earned upon our mortgage loan portfolio is generally based upon a fixed rate of interest or a variable rate of interest that periodically reprices, while the interest to be paid upon our outstanding debts is directly, or indirectly, tied to the prime rate of interest charged by major banks.

Pursuant to the loan agreement with the bank, we have pledged all of our mortgage loans, church bonds and interim construction loans to the bank to secure the line of credit. The amount owing on the line of credit must not exceed an amount equal to 85% of the outstanding principal amount of the performing mortgage loans and church bonds and 50% of the outstanding principal amount of the performing interim construction loans. Applying that borrowing limit to our loan portfolio as of June 30, 2009, we can borrow up to the entire $49,000,000 line of credit limit. However, during the term of the loan agreement, we would not have the right to sell our loans, without the bank’s consent, since all of our loans have been pledged to the bank to secure the line of credit. Therefore, under our loan agreement, it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to sell our loans to meet our financial obligations.

Cash flows from operating activities consist primarily of net income. The primary components of net income are interest income and expense. Interest income should continue to be the main source of cash provided by operating activities; however, the availability of this cash flow is dependent upon the ability of the borrowers to repay loans. Cash provided by operating activities has been and is expected to be a relatively stable source of cash flow.

Cash flows from investing activities results primarily from investment in and payments received on mortgage and interim construction loans and church bonds.

Cash flows from financing activities relate primarily to the borrowings and payments on notes payable and the line of credit. Borrowings are made as funds are needed to make loans or as current obligations become due. Based upon our success to obtain borrowings in the past, we are confident that we will be able to obtain borrowings in the future in sufficient amounts, along with payments to be received on loans, to timely meet our obligations.

-18-

Inflation

At ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009, the weighted average interest rate on our mortgage loan and church bond portfolio was 7.7248% per annum while the weighted average interest rate upon all our borrowings was 23.8673% per annum resulting in a net interest rate margin of 43.8675%. By comparison, as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2008, the weighted average interest rate on our mortgage loan and church bond portfolio was 8.5140% per annum while the weighted average interest rate on our borrowings was 63.3583% per annum resulting in a net interest rate margin of 24.1657% per annum. Therefore, our net interest rate margin has ~~increased~~decreased by ~~270~~82 basis points as of ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 as compared to ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2007~~2008. Although a majority of the loans constituting our loan portfolio have been made at rates of interest that generally reprice either daily, annually, or otherwise periodically, a portion of the loans constituting our loan portfolio have been made at fixed rates of interest and therefore are not subject to being increased or decreased during the term of the loan. All of our indebtedness is either directly or indirectly tied to the prime rate of interest charged by major banking institutions and, therefore, is subject to fluctuation.

During periods of inflation, the prime rate of interest charged by major banking institutions, as well as the interest rate or cost of borrowing money from any lender, generally increases. Consequently, during an inflationary period our interest expense would increase. Since our interest income would not increase as rapidly, an increase in the interest expense would decrease our net income. However, interest income should subsequently increase as variable rate loans reprice.

Should the amount of our loans and the amount of our indebtedness remain constant, and should the weighted average interest rate upon the indebtedness increase to approximately 1312.824% per annum, interest income and interest expense would be substantially equal.

Under the terms of the ~~new~~ loan agreement with Amarillo National Bank ~~effective January 31~~, ~~2009,~~ the interest rate on our line of credit adjusts in accordance with the lesser of the 30-day, 90-day or 180-day London Interbank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”) or the J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. prime rate, subject to an interest rate floor of 4%. The interest rate on our Master Note Agreements adjusts as and when the Prime Rate as published by the Wall Street Journal changes subject to a floor of 3%. Most of our loans are made on interest rates that are tied to the Prime Rate as published by the Wall Street Journal or a similar index used by major U.S. banking institutions. Therefore, our cost of funds should be tied to an index that is equal to or less than the index used to price our loan portfolio.

~~-15-~~The loan agreement with Amarillo National Bank effective January 31, 2009 changed the index on the rate we pay on the line of credit from, at our option, either LIBOR plus 2.5% or the J. P. Morgan Chase prime rate. These indices are higher than under the previous loan agreement. Additionally, the new loan agreement provides for an interest rate floor of 4% and a commitment fee equal to .25% of the average quarterly unadvanced portion of the loan commitment.

We expect that our cost of funds will increase beginning January 1, 2009 due to several factors. First of all, the extension of our January 31, 2006 loan agreement and the new January 31, 2009 loan agreement provides for an interest rate floor of 4%. This interest rate floor will result in an immediate increase in the weighted average interest rate on our indebtedness beginning January 1, 2009. Secondly, the new loan agreement dated January 31, 2009 changes the index on the rate we pay Amarillo National Bank on the line of credit from, at our option, either the LIBOR plus 1.6% or the J.P. Morgan Chase prime rate less 1% to the LIBOR plus 2.5% or the J. P. Morgan Chase prime rate. Additionally, the new loan agreement provides for a commitment fee equal to .25% of the average quarterly unadvanced portion of the loan commitment. Finally, effective February 1, 2009, we agreed to also place an interest rate floor of 3% on our Master Note Agreements. The interest rate floor on the Master Note Agreements was instituted in order to encourage the maintenance of this source of funds.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments other than our normal loan commitments.

New Accounting Standards

We do not believe the adoption of any recently issued pronouncements by the Financial Accounting Standards Board will have a significant impact on our financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not required

-19-

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

We performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e), were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during our fiscal quarter ending ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2008~~2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

None

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None

Item 5. Other Information.

Our existing line of credit agreement with Amarillo National Bank dated January 31, 2006 was set to expire on December 31, 2008. This Agreement was extended pursuant to an extension dated December 30, 2008. Thereafter, we entered into a new loan agreement dated January 31, 2009 with Amarillo National Bank renewing and extending None

-16-

our line of credit facility with the bank. The 2009 agreement increases the line of credit from $35,000,000 to $49,000,000. However, the extension of our January 31, 2006 loan agreement and the new January 31, 2009 loan agreement provides for an interest rate floor of 4%. Furthermore, the 2009 loan agreement changes the index on the rate we pay Amarillo National Bank on the line of credit to either the LIBOR plus 2.5% or the J. P. Morgan Chase prime rate, at our option. This is in contrast to a more favorable index under the 2006 agreement of either the LIBOR plus 1.6% or the J.P. Morgan Chase prime rate less 1%, again at our option. Additionally, the new loan agreement provides for a commitment fee equal to .25% of the average quarterly unadvanced portion of the loan commitment. There was no such non-use fee under the 2006 agreement.

Finally, effective February 1, 2009, we agreed to also place an interest rate floor of 3% on our Master Note Agreements.

Item 6. Exhibits

The Exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed as a part of this Quarterly Report.

-17-

CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST (A Real Estate Investment Trust) INDEX TO EXHIBITS
(2)	None
(3)	(i) Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust dated July 16, 2004, previously filed as an exhibit to the Trust’s Definitive Proxy Statement, Form DEF 14A, dated June 25, 2004 (File No. 000-08117) and is incorporated by reference.
	(ii) Amended and Restated Bylaws dated July 16, 2004, previously filed as an exhibit to the Trust’s Definitive Proxy Statement, Form DEF 14A, dated June 25, 2004 (File No. 000-08117) and is incorporated by reference.
(4)	None other than those listed in (3) above.
(10)	Loan Agreement dated January 31, 2006 entered into by and between Church Loans and Amarillo National Bank included as an exhibit to Issuer’s Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2005, under File No. 000-08117 and is incorporated by reference. Loan Agreement dated January 31, 2009 entered into by and between Church Loans and Amarillo National Bank.
(11)	Statement regarding computation of per share earnings-omitted since information necessary to make the computation is included in the Financial Statements.
(15)	None
(18)	None
(19)	None
(22)	None
(23)	None
(24)	None
(31)	(i)(1) Certification of President (Principal Executive Officer and CEO) Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	(2) Certification of Senior Vice-President and CFO (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	(ii) None
(32)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(99)	None
(100)	None

-18-

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
		CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST
	By:			/s/ Kelly Archer
			Kelly Archer President and CEO
	Date:		February 13, 2009
	By:			/s/ Robert E. Fowler
			Robert E. Fowler Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
	Date:		February 13, 2009

-19-

Trade Mark and Copyright Notice Copyright © 2009 by Church Loans & Investments Trust This report is copyrighted material of Church Loans & Investments Trust. Church Loans & Investments Trust is a federally registered service mark of the Trustees of Church Loans & Investments Trust. The unauthorized use of the trade mark, service mark and copyrights of Church Loans & Investments Trust without the express, written permission of Church Loans & Investments Trust, is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.

-20-


CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST (A Real Estate Investment Trust) INDEX TO EXHIBITS
(2)	None
(3)	(i) Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust dated July 16, 2004, previously filed as an exhibit to the Trust’s Definitive Proxy Statement, Form DEF 14A, dated June 25, 2004 (File No. 000-08117) and is incorporated by reference.
	(ii) Amended and Restated Bylaws dated July 16, 2004, previously filed as an exhibit to the Trust’s Definitive Proxy Statement, Form DEF 14A, dated June 25, 2004 (File No. 000-08117) and is incorporated by reference.
(4)	None other than those listed in (3) above.
(10)	Loan Agreement dated January 31, 2009 entered into by and between Church Loans and Amarillo National Bank included as an exhibit to Issuer’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 000-08117) and is incorporated by reference. Form of Master Note Agreements included as an exhibit to Issuer’s Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 (File No. 000-08117) and is incorporated by reference.
(11)	Statement regarding computation of per share earnings-omitted since information necessary to make the computation is included in the Financial Statements.
(15)	None
(18)	None
(19)	None
(22)	None
(23)	None
(24)	None
(31)	(i)(1) Certification of President (Principal Executive Officer and CEO) Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	(2) Certification of Senior Vice-President and CFO (Principal Financial Officer) Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
	(ii) None
(32)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(99)	None

(100)	None

-21-



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		CHURCH LOANS & INVESTMENTS TRUST

	By:			/s/ B.R. McMorries
			B.R. McMorries President and CEO
	Date:		August 13, 2009


	By:			/s/ Robert E. Fowler
			Robert E. Fowler Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
	Date:		August 13, 2009

-22-

Trade Mark and Copyright Notice

Copyright © 2009 by Church Loans & Investments Trust
This report is copyrighted material of
Church Loans & Investments Trust.

Church Loans & Investments Trust is a federally registered service mark
of the Trustees of Church Loans & Investments Trust.

The unauthorized use of the trade mark, service mark and copyrights
of Church Loans & Investments Trust without the express,
written permission of Church Loans & Investments Trust,
is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.

-23-

Filing Compare · CLI Capital