UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)
☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the fiscal year ended	December 31, ~~2024~~2025
OR
☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-8641

COEUR MINING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		82-0109423
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
200 South Wacker Drive	Suite 2100	60606
Chicago	IL	(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 489-5800

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock (par value $.01 per share)	CDE	New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

☑

Accelerated filer

☐

Non-accelerated filer

☐

Smaller reporting company

☐

Emerging growth company

☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive- based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

$25,~~209~~605,~~241~~534,~~490~~558

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of February 1716, ~~2025~~2026, ~~638~~642,~~557~~097,~~875~~555 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information called for by Part III of the Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the ~~2025~~2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

COEUR MINING, INC.

FORM 10-K

INDEX

PART I
Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	10
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	2627
Item 1C.	Cybersecurity	2627
Item 2.	Properties	2728
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	3739
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3740
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	3841
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	4043
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6368
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	6469
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	~~101~~109
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	~~101~~109
Item 9B.	Other Information	~~101~~110
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	~~102~~111
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	~~102~~111
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	~~102~~111
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	~~102~~111
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	~~103~~112
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	~~104~~113
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	~~106~~115
SIGNATURES		~~107~~116

PART I

Item 1.Business

GENERAL

Coeur Mining, Inc. (“Coeur”, “the Company”, or “we”), founded in 1928, is a precious metals producer with assets located in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Our common stock is listed on The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CDE”.

Coeur’s strategy is to be a well-diversified, growing precious metals producer with a focus on generating sustainable, high-quality cash flow and returns from a balanced, prospective asset base in mining-friendly jurisdictions along with our commitment to exploration and expansions. Our strategy is guided by our purpose statement, We Pursue a Higher Standard, and three key principles: Protect our People, Places and Planet; Develop Quality Resources, Growth and Plans; and Deliver Impactful Results Through Teamwork. We conduct our business with a proactive focus on responsible practices to positively impact the health, safety and socioeconomic status of our people and the communities in which we operate and be good stewards of the environment.

OUR BUSINESS

Operating Segments

We produce and sell precious metals from the following operating segments:

•The ~~Palmarejo~~Las ~~gold-~~Chispas underground silver-gold ~~complex~~mine, located in the State of ~~Chihuahua~~Sonora in northern Mexico, which ~~has~~began ~~been~~operations in ~~operation~~2022 ~~since~~and ~~2009~~was acquired by Coeur in early 2025.

•The Palmarejo silver-gold complex, located in the State of Chihuahua in northern Mexico, which has been in operation since 2009.

•The Rochester open pit heap leach silver-gold mine, located in northwestern Nevada, which has been in operation since 1986 and completed a significant expansion in 2024.

•The Kensington underground gold mine, located north of Juneau, Alaska, which began operations in 2010.

•The Wharf open pit heap leach gold mine, located near Lead, South Dakota, which ~~was~~began ~~acquired~~operations ~~by Coeur~~ in ~~2015~~1982.

~~•The~~In ~~newly~~addition, ~~acquired~~the ~~Las~~Company ~~Chispas~~operates the Silvertip underground silver-~~gold~~zinc-lead ~~mine~~exploration project, located in ~~the~~northern ~~State~~British ofColumbia, ~~Sonora in northern Mexico~~Canada, which ~~began~~was ~~operations~~acquired by Coeur in ~~2022~~2017.

InOn ~~addition~~November 2, 2025, the Company ~~operates~~entered into a definitive agreement (the ~~Silvertip~~“Arrangement ~~underground~~Agreement”) ~~silver~~whereby, a wholly-~~zinc~~owned subsidiary of Coeur (“Canadian Sub”) would acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of New Gold Inc. (“New Gold”) pursuant to a court-~~lead~~approved ~~exploration~~plan ~~project~~of ~~located~~arrangement in(the ~~northern~~“New ~~British~~Gold ~~Columbia~~Transaction”). Under the terms of the Arrangement Agreement, ~~Canada~~New Gold shareholders were to receive 0.4959 Coeur common shares for each New Gold common share (the “Exchange Ratio”). The New Gold Transaction is anticipated to close in the first half of 2026, ~~which~~subject ~~was~~to ~~acquired~~relevant byregulatory approvals and routine closing conditions. Coeur’s presence in ~~2017~~Canada is expected to grow with the addition of two Canadian operations, the New Afton gold-copper mine and the Rainy River gold-silver mine, as a result of the acquisition.

Metals Prices and Hedging Activities

The financial results of the Company and its operating segments are substantially dependent upon the market prices of gold and silver, which fluctuate widely. The Company has in the past, and may in the future, enter into derivative contracts to protect the selling price for certain anticipated gold and silver production and to manage risks associated with foreign currencies. For additional information, see “Item 1A – Risk Factors”, “Item 7A. – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and “Note 1314 – Derivative Financial Instruments in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”.

Metal Processing, Marketing and Sales

We produce gold and silver doré, as well as gold concentrate. The doré produced at the ~~Palmarejo~~Las ~~complex~~Chispas mine, ~~Rochester~~Palmarejo ~~mine~~complex, and ~~newly~~Rochester ~~acquired Las Chispas~~ mine, as well as the electrolytic cathodic sludge produced by the Wharf mine, is refined by a geographically diverse group of third-party refiners into gold and silver bullion according to benchmark standards set by the London Bullion Market Association, which regulates the acceptable requirements for bullion traded in the London precious metals markets. We then sell gold and silver bullion to multi-national banks, bullion trading houses, and refiners across the globe. Our gold concentrate product from the Kensington mine is sold under a long-term offtake agreement and is shipped to geographically diverse third-party smelters.

We believe that the loss of any one smelter, refiner, trader or third-party customer would not materially adversely affect us due to the liquidity of the markets and current availability of alternative trading counterparties.

Commodities

We purchase materials and supplies from third parties to conduct our business, including electricity, fuel, chemical reagents, explosives, steel and concrete. Prices for these commodities are volatile and can fluctuate due to conditions that are difficult to predict, including inflation, currency fluctuations, global competition for resources, consumer or industrial demand and other factors. For most of these commodities, we have existing alternate sources of supply, or alternate sources of supply are readily available. We continuously monitor supply and cost trends for these items.

and other factors. For most of these commodities, we have existing alternate sources of supply, or alternate sources of supply are readily available. We continuously monitor supply and cost trends for these items.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

General

Our business is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws governing the protection of the environment, prospecting, development, production, mine closure, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances, protection of endangered, protected or other specified species and other matters. The costs to comply with these regulatory requirements are substantial and possible future legislation and regulations could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions and delays in the development and continued operation of our properties, the extent of which cannot be predicted. Expenditures for environmental compliance in ~~2025~~2026 are expected to range from $1218.31 million to $1328.31 million, which includes New Gold assets. We have reviewed and considered current federal legislation relating to climate change and do not believe the legislation to have a material effect on our operations. Future changes in U.S., Mexican or Canadian federal, state or provincial laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect upon us and our results of operations. For additional information regarding key regulatory risks, please see “Item 1A -– Risk Factors”.

Permitting

The Rochester, Kensington and Wharf mines are subject to extensive U.S. federal and state permitting laws and regulations. Mexico, where the Palmarejo complex and Las Chispas mine are located, and Canada, where the Silvertip exploration property is located, have both adopted laws and guidelines for environmental permitting that are similar to those in effect in the United States. The permitting process in each jurisdiction requires, among other things, a thorough study to determine the baseline condition of the mining site and surrounding area, an environmental impact analysis, and proposed mitigation measures to minimize and offset the environmental impact of mining operations, in addition to consultation requirements with local indigenous groups, in certain instances. We have received all permits required to operate and carry out the current scope of activities at the Palmarejo complex, Las Chispas, Rochester, Kensington and Wharf mines, and the Silvertip exploration property. WeHowever, we are in the process of amending ~~existing~~an ~~permits~~operating permit at ~~our~~Las ~~Palmarejo~~Chispas ~~complex, including a significant operating permit~~ that is set to expire in ~~October~~November ~~2025~~2026, which is expected to support future planned activities. If we pursue an expansion at Silvertip, it will require new or amended permits.

Maintenance of Mining Claims

All of the jurisdictions where we operate impose federal, state and/or provincial requirements for maintaining mining claims (United States), mining concessions (Mexico) and mineral claims and mining leases (British Columbia), including fees, reporting, and/or evidence of work, among other requirements. Our failure to comply with any of these requirements could result in the loss of our ability to conduct mining activities in a particular location, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Effective human capital management at Coeur is critical to achieving our strategic goals. We aim to be an employer of choice by promoting safety first and proactively developing our people, while fostering a healthy and inclusive culture. At December 31, ~~2024~~2025, we had approximately 2,~~116~~620 employees (1,~~176~~289 in the U.S., 711,235 in ~~Canada~~Mexico and ~~869~~96 in ~~Mexico~~Canada) and over ~~700 people were working as contractors in support of Coeur’s operations. The newly acquired Las Chispas mine has 314 employees and approximately 775 people working as contractors.~~

2,093 (1,602 in Mexico, 433 in the U.S. and 58 in Canada) people were working as contractors in support of Coeur’s operations.

Culture Assessment

We are focused on regular evaluation of our culture. In ~~2023~~2025, we invited all employees to participate in our third culture assessment by completing an anonymous survey. Employee participation in ~~2023~~2025 was 8492%, which exceeded industry benchmarks. Feedback was reviewed by the management team and our Board of Directors (our “Board”). The management team also reviewed the results with employees at each of our operations through facilitated discussions to gain additional insight into the feedback. We developed site-specific action plans to address feedback and monitor progress in the future. The results of the assessment confirmed our belief that we have an ethical, safe, engaged, and proud workforce and also highlighted areas for improvement that are now being addressed. ~~We intend to conduct another culture assessment in 2025.~~

Recruitment

We seek to recruit and retain employees at all levels who embody our purpose statement, We Pursue a Higher Standard, through safe and ethical conduct. Our strong culture of teamwork and our reputation as a responsible company and an engaged community member ~~motivates~~motivate new employee referrals. We have also created a series of partnership programs in local communities to provide internships, scholarships, and apprenticeships to build a pipeline of potential employees in the next generation.

generation. We have maintained an average employee age of 40 years old since 2018 by focusing on building our bench strength and increasing our under 40 population to 33% of our workforce.

Inclusion

~~Our Chairman, President & CEO, Mitchell Krebs, was the first precious metals mining CEO to sign the CEO ACTION for Diversity & Inclusion pledge. This pledge highlights~~ Coeur’s continuing commitment to fostering an inclusive workforce, is evidenced by programs such as Coeur Heroes, which provided over 80110 career opportunities to current and former U.S. ~~Military~~military personnel last year. ~~Four~~We ofpartner ~~our~~with ~~Board~~a ~~members~~variety ~~have indicated that they are diverse, and 12%~~ of ~~our~~industry ~~employees~~groups ~~are female, up from 10% in 2020. While we continue~~ to ~~work~~reinforce topipeline ~~increase~~development our overall female population, over 60% of our female employees are supervisor or higher-level positions. In the U.S., approximately 23% of our workforce is non-white, up from 18% in 2020. Partnerships with organizations like the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) and ~~Women~~recruiting inefforts ~~Mining (WiM)~~ at ~~their~~key Uuniversities.S. ~~university chapters are providing further avenues for recruiting.~~ In order to emphasize the importance of inclusion in the workplace, we provided ~~training to~~ our hourly workforce at every operation with training on topics such as bullying and bystander intervention, as well as education on overall mental wellness to support each employee feeling respected and included at work.

Employee Development

We periodically solicit feedback on each member of our executive team through 360 assessments. We believe this feedback is important to maintaining a strong culture by effectively assessing leadership performance and development, increasing accountability, facilitating succession planning and identifying areas for improvement and change. We provide opportunities for employees to participate in IMPACT training, an intensive ~~one~~18-~~year~~month training program we created for front-line supervisors throughout our ~~organizational~~organization ~~structure~~ to focus on leadership development and mining as a business. Through IMPACT training, we have invested over 2226,~~500~~250 cumulative hours of leadership training and personal development in almost ~~200~~270 employees. In 2022, after many employees had graduated from IMPACT training over the last 4four years, we introduced our first Advanced IMPACT training for employees at manager and director levels in the organization.

Succession Planning

We conduct robust succession planning throughout the organization annually, by employing specific talent diagnostics and skills development. High potential talent within the organization is identified, and development plans are created starting from our front-line supervisors and up to our Chief ~~Operating~~Executive Officer.

Our Board oversees the recruitment, development, and retention of our senior executives. Significant focus is placed on succession planning both for key executive roles and also deeper into the organization. In-depth discussions occur multiple times per year in meetings of the Board, Compensation and Leadership Development Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, including in executive sessions to foster candid conversations. Directors have regular and direct exposure to senior leadership and high-potential employees during Board and committee meetings and through other informal meetings and events held during the year.

Local Hire

Investing in local communities extends beyond financial support. Since 2018, we have hired an average of 60% of our new hires from local communities. During ~~2024~~2025, we provided over 40 apprenticeships and internships and worked with organizations such as By the Hand Club in Chicago to educate youth in our communities about career opportunities in mining. Providing career opportunities to local community members and participating in community initiatives ~~creates~~help create a closer connection between our operations and local stakeholders and communities.

Rewards & Wellness

As part of our fundamental need to attract and retain talent, we regularly evaluate our compensation, benefits, and employee wellness offerings. We have determined that our average employee earns over 40% more than the average employee in their local markets according to industry benchmarking. Over 93% of U.S. employees are enrolled in our medical benefit plan, and over 90% of U.S. employees contribute to our 401(k) plan. Supplemental healthcare is provided above government requirements in both Canada and Mexico. We were a leader in the mining industry by providing domestic partner benefits in 2017 and participation has increased 250% since introduction. In 2022, we expanded paid parental and primary caregiver leave for U.S. employees.

In addition, we have engaged a third-party mental health care provider for innovative care and counseling resources. This resource leverages technology and clinical best practices to assist our employees and their families gain fast access to highly effective quality care when needed most. We also implemented a Total Worker Health program in 2023, which integrates protection from work-related safety and health hazards with promotion of injury and illness-prevention efforts to advance worker well-being both physically and mentally. In 2025, our Rochester mine opened our first medical clinic in nearby Lovelock, Nevada, which will offer healthcare services to all Coeur Rochester employees and dependents. This investment in our employees and their families underscores Coeur’s commitment to leaving a positive legacy in the communities we serve and prioritizing the health and wellbeing of our employees and their families.

RESPONSIBILITY

At Coeur, we strive for best-in-class environmental performance while meeting the needs of today and respecting the needs of future generations. As a precious metals producer, we have the unique opportunity to supply the raw materials that ~~play~~are aessential ~~key~~to ~~role~~economic ingrowth ~~numerous~~and ~~economic~~ priorities, including in clean energy and technology sectors. We work to protect our environment through an approach of responsible production and a focus on best practices. On an ongoing basis, we conduct site-specific environmental risk reviews and utilize a set of key performance indicators (“KPIs”) to evaluate performance results by mine. We believe that this systematic approach leads to awareness, risk mitigation and a pursuit of continuous improvement. Comprehensive environmental management plans, in conjunction with topic-specific plans, such as waste management and water resource protection, at each site provide guidance on how to implement our environmental initiatives and meet or exceed regulatory standards.

We recognize changes in stakeholder expectations related to various environmental, social and governance issues, including risks and opportunities related to water stewardship, tailings management, biodiversity, and climate change and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions~~, biodiversity, water stewardship and tailings management~~. To that end, We Pursue a Higher Standard through our governance and associated management systems and programs for material topics. For example, we:

•further increased the amount of renewable energy in our purchased electricity through formal agreements with energy providers;

•actively manage GHG emissions and achieved our 35% net intensity reduction target by the end of 2024 compared to base-year;

•enhanced our climate disclosures in-line with recommendations set by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”);

•informed by the knowledge and systems developed as part of our first climate scenario analysis, we continue to incorporate climate-related risks and opportunities into our enterprise risk management and long-term business planning and strategy;

•developed and are implementing a Biodiversity Management Standard;

•drive sound water stewardship, whether treating and discharging water at sites where water is abundant or efficiently using water at sites where water is scarce; ~~and~~

•formalized a Tailings Management Policy and committed to adopting the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (“GISTM”).;

•developed and are implementing a Biodiversity Management Standard;

•further increased the amount of cost-effective renewable energy in our purchased electricity through formal agreements with energy providers, reducing costs and GHG emissions;

•actively managed GHG emissions and achieved our 35% net intensity reduction target by the end of 2024 compared to base-year;

•enhanced our climate disclosures in-line with recommendations set by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”); and

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We make available on our website (http://www.coeur.com) our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and Proxy Statements, as well as Forms 3, 4 and 5 with respect to our common stock, including any amendments to any of the foregoing, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These filings are also available at http://www.sec.gov.

Copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters of the key committees of the Board (Audit, Compensation and Leadership Development, Executive, Finance and Technical, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Environmental, Health, Safety, and Corporate Responsibility Committees) and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, among others, are also available on our website. Information contained on our website is not a part of this Report.

Copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters of the key committees of the Board (Audit, Compensation and Leadership Development, Executive, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Environmental, Health, Safety, and Corporate Responsibility Committees) and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, applicable to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, among others, are also available on our website. Information contained on our website is not a part of this Report.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report contains numerous forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) relating to our mining business, including anticipated mineral reserve and resource estimates, exploration efforts and expenditures, development and expansion initiatives ~~at Kensington and Silvertip~~, ~~expectations~~the ~~about~~pending ~~timing~~acquisition of ~~deliveries~~New ~~against~~Gold ~~the Kensington~~Inc., ~~Rochester and Wharf prepayments,~~ permitting, estimated production, costs, capital expenditures, expenses, recoveries, metals prices, integration of acquisitions, sufficiency of assets, ability to discharge liabilities, liquidity management, financing needs, environmental compliance expenditures, ~~environmental,~~sustainability ~~social~~ and ~~governance (“ESG”) and~~ human capital management initiatives, risk management strategies, including hedging, capital resources and use, cash flow maximization, mine life and other strategic initiatives. Such forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “projected,” “contemplates,” “anticipates” or similar words and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include: (i) the risk factors set forth below under “Item 1A – Risk Factors” and in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Item 7; (ii) the risk that anticipated production, cost, expenditure and expense levels at Las Chispas, Palmarejo, Rochester, Wharf and Kensington are not attained; (iii) the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including risks inherent in developing and expanding large-scale mining projects, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, weather or geologically-related conditions); (iv) changes in the market prices of gold and silver and a sustained lower price or higher treatment and refining charge environment; (v) the impact of geopolitical conditions, pandemics or epidemics, climate change, extreme weather events and other macro conditions, including disruptions to operations, the need for heightened health and safety protocols, inflation, and disruptions to our vendors, suppliers and the communities where we operate; (vi) the uncertainties inherent in Coeur’s production, exploration and development activities, including risks relating to permitting and regulatory delays (including the impact of government shutdowns), ground conditions, grade and recovery variability; (vii) any future labor disputes or work stoppages (involving us or our subsidiaries or third parties); (viii) the risk of adverse outcomes in litigation; (ix) the uncertainties inherent in the estimation of gold, silver, zinc and lead mineral reserves and resources; (x) impacts from Coeur’s future acquisition of new mining properties or businesses, including the pending acquisition of New Gold, Inc.; (xi) the loss of access or insolvency of any third-party refiner or smelter to whom Coeur markets its production; (xii) inflationary pressures and impacts from tariffs and other trade barriers; (xiii) continued access to financing sources; (xiv) government orders that may require temporary suspension of operations at one or more of our sites and effects on our suppliers or the refiners and smelters to whom the Company markets its production and on the communities where we operate; (xv) the effects of environmental and other governmental regulations and government shut-downs; (xvi) the risks inherent in the ownership or operation of or investment in mining properties or businesses in foreign countries; ~~and~~ (xvii) our ability to raise additional financing necessary to conduct our business, make payments or refinance our debt; and (xviii) the risk that the pending acquisition of New Gold Inc. may not occur on the timeline expected or at all. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF MINERAL PROPERTIES

Mineral Reserves and Resources

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and applicable Canadian securities laws, and as a result, we report our mineral reserves and mineral resources according to two different standards. U.S. reporting requirements are governed by Item 1300 of Regulation S-K (“S-K 1300”), as issued by the SEC. Canadian reporting requirements for disclosure of mineral properties are governed by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”), as adopted from the definitions provided by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum. Both sets of reporting standards have similar goals in terms of conveying an appropriate level of confidence in the disclosures being reported, but the standards embody slightly different approaches and definitions.

In our public filings in the U.S. and Canada and in certain other announcements not filed with the SEC, we disclose proven and probable reserves and measured, indicated and inferred resources, each as defined in S-K 1300. The estimation of measured resources and indicated resources involves greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves, and therefore, investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into S-K 1300-compliant reserves. The estimation of inferred resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic viability than the estimation of other categories of resources, and therefore it cannot be assumed that all or any part of inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of inferred resources exist, or that they can be mined economically.

Technical Report Summaries and Qualified Persons

~~description~~far ofgreater ~~the~~uncertainty ~~key~~as ~~assumptions, parameters and methods used~~ to ~~estimate~~their ~~mineral~~existence ~~reserves~~ and ~~mineral~~economic ~~resources~~viability ~~included~~than inthe ~~this~~estimation ~~Form~~of ~~10-K,~~other ascategories ~~well~~of asresources, ~~data verification procedures~~ and atherefore ~~general~~it ~~discussion~~cannot ofbe ~~the~~assumed ~~extent~~that toall ~~which~~or ~~the~~any ~~estimates~~part ~~may~~of beinferred ~~affected~~resources bywill ~~any~~ever ~~known~~be ~~environmental,~~upgraded ~~permitting,~~to ~~legal,~~a ~~title,~~higher ~~taxation,~~category. ~~sociopolitical~~Therefore, ~~marketing~~investors orare ~~other~~cautioned ~~relevant~~not ~~factors,~~to ~~please~~assume ~~review~~that ~~the~~all ~~Technical~~or ~~Report~~any ~~Summaries~~part ~~for each~~ of ~~the~~inferred ~~Company’s~~resources ~~material properties which are included as exhibits to~~exist, ~~and~~or ~~incorporated~~that bythey ~~reference~~can ~~into,~~be ~~this~~mined ~~Report~~economically.

Technical Report Summaries and Qualified Persons

The scientific and technical information concerning our mineral projects in this Form 10-K have been reviewed and approved by “qualified persons” under S-K 1300, including our Senior Vice President, Technical Services, Christopher Pascoe. For a description of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate mineral reserves and mineral resources included in this Form 10-K, as well as data verification procedures and a general discussion of the extent to which the estimates may be affected by any known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing or other relevant factors, please review the Technical Report Summaries for each of the Company’s material properties which are included as exhibits to, and incorporated by reference into, this Report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following discussion, together with the other information set forth in this report, presents what management currently believes could be material risk factors and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. Other risks and uncertainties, including those not presently known to us or those that we do not believe are material currently may also affect our business and thus the following should not be considered a complete discussion of all risks and uncertainties that the Company may face.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY

Our results of operations, cash flows and operating costs are highly dependent upon the market prices of gold and silver and of key input commodities used in our business, which are volatile and beyond our control.

Gold and silver are actively traded commodities, and their prices are volatile. The high and low prices for each commodity during the 12 months ended December 31, ~~2024~~2025 are set forth in the following table:

Metal

High Price for ~~2024~~2025

Date

Low Price for ~~2024~~2025

Date

Gold (per ounce)

$24,~~778~~449

~~October~~December 3023, ~~2024~~2025

$12,~~985~~633

~~February~~January 146, ~~2024~~2025

Silver (per ounce)

$3474.5184

~~October~~December 2330, ~~2024~~2025

$2229.0941

~~February~~January 142, ~~2024~~2025

Gold and silver prices are affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including U.S. dollar strength or weakness, speculation, global currency values, global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions and other factors. In addition, Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”), which have substantially facilitated the ability of large and small investors to buy and sell precious metals, have become significant holders of gold and silver. Gold and silver prices are also affected by prevailing interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations of the future rate of inflation and governmental monetary decisions regarding central bank holdings.

Because we derive all of our revenues from sales of these metals, our results of operations and cash flows will fluctuate as the prices of these metals change. Additionally, with the upcoming acquisition of New Gold, our results of operations and cash flows will fluctuate as the prices of copper changes. A period of significant and sustained lower prices would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. In response to environments of lower metal prices and/or higher treatment and refining charges, we may have to revise our operating plans, including reducing operating costs and capital expenditures, terminating or suspending mining operations at one or more of our properties and discontinuing certain exploration and development plans. These types of initiatives may not sufficiently offset reductions in revenues, and we may continue to incur losses associated with sustained lower metals prices and/or higher treatment and refining charges.

Operating costs at our mines are also affected by the price of input commodities, such as fuel, electricity, labor, chemical reagents, explosives, steel and concrete. Prices for these input commodities are volatile and can fluctuate due to conditions that are difficult to predict, including global competition for resources, inflation, currency fluctuations, consumer or industrial demand and other factors. An increase in the cost, or decrease in the availability, of input commodities, labor, or equipment, due to factors beyond the Company’s control may affect the timely conduct and cost of our operations and development projects. Continued volatility in the prices of commodities and other supplies we purchase could lead to higher costs, which would adversely affect results of operations and cash flows.

Volatility in metals prices may also impact the price of our outstanding securities.

Speculation in the market may result in short term volatility in the prices of the metals we produce and result in significant changes in the price of our securities, which may not be reflective of our operating performance or financial results. For example, the price of silver increased 511% between ~~May~~October 233, ~~2024~~2025 and ~~May~~October 2916, ~~2024~~2025, and then decreased by 69% on ~~June~~October 729, ~~2024~~2025. This swing in the price of silver was seemingly attributable to a coordinated effort by market participants to drive up the price of silver and did not reflect changes in the underlying fundamentals that typically drive changes in the price of silver, including supply and demand. The price of our common stock increased by 623% and decreased by 621% during the same periods. The trading volume for shares of our common stock also increased significantly during this period. This volatility in the price of our common stock did not, in our view, reflect any significant change in our business or results of operations during the same period.

The estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources is imprecise and depends upon subjective factors. Estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources may not be realized in actual production. Our results of operations and financial position may be adversely affected by inaccurate estimates.

The mineral reserve and mineral resource figures presented in our public filings are estimates made by our technical personnel and independent mining consultants with whom we contract. Mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are a ~~function of geological and engineering analyses that require us to make assumptions about production costs, recoveries and the~~

function of geological and engineering analyses that require us to make assumptions about production costs, recoveries and the market prices of gold, silver, zinc and lead. While the Company believes that its mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are developed using well-established practices and with appropriate controls, mineral reserve and mineral resource estimation is an imprecise and subjective process. The accuracy of these estimates is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation, judgment and experience. Assumptions about gold, silver, zinc and lead market prices are subject to great uncertainty as those prices fluctuate widely. Declines in the market prices of gold, silver, zinc or lead may render mineral reserves and mineral resources containing relatively lower grades of mineralization uneconomic to exploit, and we may be required to reduce mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates, discontinue development or mining at one or more of our properties or write down assets as impaired. Should we encounter mineralization or geologic formations at any of our mines or projects that are different from those predicted, we may adjust our mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates and alter our mining plans. No assurances can be given that all mineral reserves will be mined, as mineralized material that may qualify as reserves under applicable standards by virtue of being economic to mine may not generate attractive enough returns to be included in our mine plans, due to factors such as the impact of the gold stream at Palmarejo. As a result, we may elect not to mine portions of the mineralized material reported as reserves. In addition, no assurances can be given that any mineral resource estimate will ultimately be reclassified as proven or probable mineral reserves or that inferred resources will be upgraded to measured or indicated resources. Updates to our mining plans or new or updated technical or geological information may also impact anticipated metal recovery rates. Any of these adjustments may adversely affect actual operating performance, production, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

A significant delay or disruption in sales of concentrates or doré as a result of the unexpected disruption in services provided by smelters, refiners or other third parties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We rely on refiners and smelters to refine, process and, in some cases, purchase the gold and silver doré and concentrate produced by our mines. Access to refiners and smelters on economic terms is critical to our ability to sell our products to buyers and generate revenues. We have existing agreements with refiners and smelters, some of whom operate their refining or smelting facilities outside the United States. We believe our current contractual arrangements are sufficient so that the loss of any one refiner or smelter would not significantly or materially impact our operations or our ability to generate revenues. Nevertheless, services provided by a refiner or smelter may be disrupted by new or increased tariffs, duties or other cross-border trade barriers, shipping delays, the bankruptcy or insolvency of one or more refiners or smelters or the inability to agree on acceptable commercial or legal terms with a refiner or smelter. Such an event or events may disrupt an existing relationship with a refiner or smelter or result in the inability to create (or the necessity to terminate) a contractual relationship with a refiner or smelter, which may leave us with limited, uneconomic or no access to refining or smelting services for short or long periods of time. Epidemics, pandemics or natural disasters may also impact refiners, smelters or other third parties with whom we have contractual arrangements or have an indirect effect on our ability to obtain refining, smelting or other third-party services.

Any delay or loss of access to refiners or smelters may significantly impact our ability to generate revenues by selling doré and concentrate products. A default by a refiner or smelter on its contractual obligations to us or an insolvency event or bankruptcy filing by a refiner or smelter may result in the partial or total loss of our doré or concentrate in the possession of the refiner or smelter, and such a loss likely would not be insured by our insurance policies. We cannot ensure that alternative refiners or smelters would be available, that they would offer comparable terms, or that we would not experience delays or disruptions in sales that would materially and adversely affect results of operations.

There are significant hazards associated with mining activities, some of which may not be fully covered by insurance.

The mining business is subject to risks and hazards, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, the encountering of unusual or unexpected geological formations, geotechnical failures, flooding, earthquakes and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions or machine failure. These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, reduced production and delays in mining, asset write-downs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. For example, a fire recently occurred in the Wharf mine crushing facility, which disabled the facility and necessitated the use of temporary crushers pending repairs.

We maintain insurance policies that protect against property loss and business interruption in amounts that we believe are reasonable taking into account the nature of, and risks related to, our business and operations as well as the cost of policy premiums. Such insurance is, however, subject to certain exclusions, and potential claims could exceed policy limits. There is no guarantee that we will receive insurance proceeds with respect to a particular event or loss, such as the claims we plan to submit related to the Wharf fire incident. Insurance fully covering many environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production, is not generally available. Any liabilities that we incur for these risks and hazards could be significant and could adversely affect results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR OPERATIONS

Our future growth will depend upon our ability to expand existing mines and develop and start-up new mines, either through exploration at existing properties or by acquisition of other mining companies or properties.

Because mines have limited lives based on proven and probable mineral reserves, our ability to achieve significant additional growth in revenues and cash flows will depend upon our success in further developing and expanding existing properties and the opportunistic acquisition or development and start-up of exploration projects or new mining properties, such as the acquisition of mining concessions from a subsidiary of Fresnillo plc that are located adjacent to the existing Palmarejo site, ~~and~~ the ~~recent~~ acquisition of SilverCrest Metals Inc. (“SilverCrest”) in February 2025, which operates the Las Chispas mine in Sonora, Mexico (the “SilverCrest Transaction”) and the expected integration of two Canadian mines, New Afton and Rainy River, as part of Coeur’s upcoming acquisition of New Gold.

While initial development of our operating mines has been substantially completed, development work continues to expand these mines while leveraging existing infrastructure. Palmarejo completed open pit mining several years ago and evolved to be an underground-only operation, developing new underground mining operations. At Rochester, we completed the POA 11 expansion in 2024, which is a significant additional expansion that includes a three-stage crushing facility, a new leach pad, and a new Merrill-Crowe processing facility and related infrastructure to support the extension of Rochester’s mine life. At Kensington, we amended our operating permit in 2022 to allow for an additional 10 years of mine life by providing for expanded tailings and waste rock storage, increased mill throughput, enhanced infrastructure and other benefits (“POA 1”). We ~~are~~recently ~~completing~~completed a multi-year exploration and underground mine development program to extend ~~the~~Kensington’s mine life. Our ability to timely complete these and future mine expansion and mine life extension projects is dependent on numerous factors, many of which are outside of our control, including, among others, availability of funding on acceptable terms, timing of receipt of permits and approvals from regulatory authorities, obtaining materials and equipment, as well as construction, engineering and other services, at favorable prices and terms, and disputes with third-party providers of materials, equipment or services. Construction services performed by contractors create a risk of delays or additional costs resulting from, among other factors: inability to negotiate contracts with favorable pricing and terms; delays in performance of the services; failure of a contractor to comply with applicable laws and regulations; termination of a contract by a contractor before completion of the services; failure by a contractor to obtain necessary equipment or materials; mismanagement by a contractor of its workforce; and insolvency or other financial difficulty encountered by a contractor which results in a delay in services or termination of a contract with the contractor. Expected benefits from the Rochester expansion are based on estimates of a variety of key factors, including mineral reserves and resources, grade, recovery rates, the ability of processing infrastructure such as the refinery to meet higher throughput rates, and operating costs among others. However, achieving results in line with those estimates is subject to risks and uncertainties such as variability in grade, recovery rates and cost inputs and any inability of infrastructure to accommodate higher throughput. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to successfully expand or extend the lives of existing mining operations, and a completed project may not yield the anticipated operational or financial benefits, such as expected availability, throughput, metal recovery rates, concentrate quality, unit costs, operating margin and/or cash flows, any of which may have a material negative impact on returns on invested capital, operating costs or cash flows.

In addition, we have acquired mining properties such as the Silvertip exploration property and the ~~recent~~Las ~~acquisition~~Chispas mine and expect to add the New Afton and Rainy River mines as part of the ~~Las~~New ~~Chispas~~Gold ~~mine~~Transaction. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully develop and start-up new mining properties, restart mining and processing activities at the Silvertip exploration property, integrate the operations of the ~~Las~~New ~~Chispas~~Afton ~~mine~~and Rainy River mines following the contemplated New Gold Transaction or acquire additional mining properties on favorable economic terms or at all.

We regularly evaluate and engage in discussions or negotiations regarding acquisition opportunities. Any transactions that we contemplate or pursue would involve risks and uncertainties and would be subject to competition from other mining companies. There can be no assurance with respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction.

We may be unable to successfully integrate, may not realize the expected benefits of recent or future acquisitions or may face risks associated with divestitures.

We regularly explore opportunities to selectively acquire other businesses or assets or to divest ourselves of all or part of certain assets in support of our growth plans and strategic objectives. There can be no assurance that the anticipated benefits of past acquisitions, including the SilverCrest Transaction and the anticipated New Gold Transaction, or any future acquisition, will be realized on the originally anticipated timeline or at all. The success and the ability to realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition will depend upon our ability to effectively manage the integration, performance and operations of entities or properties we acquire. The process of managing acquired businesses or assets may involve unforeseen challenges and may require a disproportionate amount of our resources, which may divert focus and resources from other strategic opportunities and/or from operational matters during this process. As an example, the ramp up of the Silvertip exploration property, acquired in late 2017, was slower and less profitable than originally anticipated, due primarily to more significant mill availability and

~~than originally anticipated, due primarily to more significant mill availability and~~ maintenance challenges than were anticipated at the time Silvertip was acquired, as well as deteriorating zinc and lead market conditions.

As a result of the ~~recent~~ SilverCrest Transaction, Coeur’s business has expanded to include the Las Chispas mine in Sonora, Mexico. The commercial viability of the Las Chispas operation is dependent on various elements, including mining and processing costs, deposit characteristics such as size, grade, and infrastructure accessibility, as well as the cyclical nature of metal prices and governmental regulations. Factors such as weather events, permit issues, infrastructure failures, and community-related concerns also pose threats to Las Chispas. While the precise impact of these factors is uncertain, their convergence ~~could~~may render the Las Chispas mine economically unfeasible, potentially leading to closure.

Further, with the completion of the New Gold Transaction, Coeur’s presence in Canada is expected to grow with the two Canadian operations of the New Afton gold-copper mine and Rainy River gold mine.

In addition to the above, any acquisition would be accompanied by risks, including:

•a significant change in macroeconomic conditions, including commodity prices, treatment and refining charges or stock prices after we have committed to complete the transaction and established the purchase price or exchange ratio;

•additional debt incurred or issued to fund some or all of acquisition consideration ~~(as was the case with Silvertip and Wharf)~~, resulting in increased interest expense and other borrowing costs;

•issuance of equity securities as acquisition consideration (which occurred in the ~~acquisition~~SilverCrest ofTransaction ~~the~~and ~~Lincoln~~is ~~Hill~~expected ~~and~~to ~~Silvertip~~occur ~~projects~~in ~~and~~ the ~~SilverCrest~~New Gold Transaction), resulting in ownership dilution of our existing stockholders;

•a material ore body may prove to be below our expectations;

•processing facilities may not operate as well as anticipated, and may require significant maintenance, downtime and capital investment, as was the case with the original mill at Silvertip;

•difficulties integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies and supporting expanded operations, realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization;

•difficulties or loss of social license to operate resulting from failure of efforts to establish positive relationships and/or agreements with local communities or local indigenous peoples; and

•the acquired business or assets may have significant liabilities, such as environmental liabilities, or significant capital expenditures that we failed to discover or have underestimated.

We cannot predict the impact of future acquisitions on the price of our common stock or ~~assure~~ensure that we will be able to obtain necessary acquisition or development financing on acceptable terms or at all. Unprofitable acquisitions, or additional liabilities, indebtedness or issuances of securities in connection with such acquisitions or any future mine development, may negatively affect our results of operations.

In connection with dispositions, the Company may provide representations, warranties and indemnities customary for such transactions~~, as was the case with the Company’s sale of its interest in the Crown, Sterling and La Preciosa projects~~. There is a risk that the Company may incur liability in the future associated with assets it no longer owns or in which it has a reduced interest.

Significant investment risks and operational costs are associated with exploration and development activities. These risks and costs may result in lower economic returns and may adversely affect our business.

Our ability to sustain or increase current production levels depends in part on successful exploration and development of new ore bodies and expansion of existing mining operations. Substantial expenditures are required to establish mineral reserves, to extract metals from ore and, in the case of new properties, to construct mining and processing facilities.

Our plans include several significant projects to construct or upgrade mining and processing facilities at our existing mining operations or exploration properties, ~~including~~as ~~the~~well ~~planned~~as ~~POA~~the 1anticipated ~~mine~~integration ~~life~~of ~~extension~~the atNew ~~Kensington~~Afton and ~~future~~Rainy ~~development~~River mines following the completion of the ~~Silvertip~~New ~~exploration~~Gold ~~project~~Transaction. These projects can take several months or years to complete, are complex and require significant capital expenditures, as demonstrated by the recently completed POA 11 expansion at Rochester. These projects are subject to significant risks described in this Item 1A, any of which may have a material negative impact on returns on invested capital, operating costs or cash flows.

Mineral exploration involves many risks and is frequently unproductive. Even if mineral deposits are found, those deposits may be insufficient in quantity or quality to return a profit from production, or it may take a number of years until production is possible, during which time the economic viability of the project may change. Few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. The commercial viability of a mineral deposit, once developed, depends on a ~~number of factors, including: the particular attributes of the deposit, including size, grade and proximity to infrastructure;~~

number of factors, including: the particular attributes of the deposit, including size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; government regulations, including taxes, royalties and land tenure; land use; importing and exporting of minerals; environmental protection; mineral prices; and issuance and maintenance of necessary permits. Factors that affect adequacy of infrastructure include reliability of roads, bridges, power sources and water supply; unusual or infrequent weather phenomena; sabotage; and government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination may result in not receiving an adequate return on invested capital.

In addition, exploration projects such as Silvertip may have little or no relevant operating history upon which to base estimates of future operating costs and capital requirements. Exploration project items such as estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves, metal recoveries and cash operating costs are to a large extent based upon the interpretation of geologic data obtained from a limited number of drill holes and other sampling techniques and feasibility studies. Estimates of operating costs are then derived based upon anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, the configuration of the ore body, expected recovery rates of metals from the ore, comparable facility and equipment costs, anticipated climate conditions and other factors. As a result, actual operating costs and economic returns of any and all exploration projects may materially differ from the costs and returns estimated, and accordingly, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be negatively affected.

The Company may be affected by global supply chain disruptions.

The Company may face supply chain disruptions as a result of matters outside of the Company’s control or ability to mitigate, such as natural disasters, transportation disruptions, economic instability, sanctions or tariffs, geopolitical unrest, civil or international hostilities and global pandemics, among others. Recently, the continued Russian invasion of Ukraine and the ~~Israel-Hamas~~ conflict in the Middle East have resulted in losses of life, displacement of people, and political and economic disruptions on a global scale. Additionally, recent economic tensions involving jurisdictions in which we operate or from which we source goods have resulted in ~~proposals~~proposed ~~to implement~~ or actual implementation of tariffs and other trade barriers that could result in disruptions to supply chains or lead to increased costs to obtain necessary supplies. There may be unforeseen impacts from these events globally on commodity prices, liquidity and credit or supply chains, and the Company continues to monitor them closely.

We may be required to write down certain long-lived assets, due to metal prices, operational challenges or other factors. Such write-downs may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We review our long-lived assets for recoverability pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Section 360. Under that standard, we review the recoverability of our long-lived assets, such as our mining properties, upon a triggering event. Such review involves estimating the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Impairment, measured by comparing an asset’s carrying value to its fair value, must be recognized when the carrying value of the asset exceeds these cash flows. We conduct a review of the financial performance of our mines in connection with the preparation of our financial statements for each reporting period and determine whether any triggering events are indicated.

If there are significant and sustained declines in relevant metal prices, or if we fail to control production and operating costs or realize the mineable ore reserves at our mining properties, we may terminate or suspend mining operations at one or more properties. These events could require a further write-down of the carrying value of our assets. Any such actions would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may record other types of charges in the future if we sell a property or asset for a price less than its carrying value or have to increase reclamation liabilities in connection with the closure and reclamation of a property. Any additional write-downs of mining properties or other assets could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Coeur is an international company and is exposed to political and social risks associated with its foreign operations.

A significant portion of our revenues is generated by operations outside the United States, particularly Mexico. Exploration, development, production and closure activities in many countries are potentially subject to heightened political and social risks that are beyond our control and could result in increased costs, capacity constraints and potential disruptions to our business. These risks include the possible unilateral cancellation or forced renegotiation of contracts in which we, directly or indirectly, may have an interest, unfavorable changes in foreign laws and regulations, royalty and tax increases (including taxes associated with the import or export of goods), risks associated with the value-added tax (“VAT”) and income tax refund recovery and collection process, aggressive or punitive tax audits, policy-driven or punitive interference with or moratoriums on processing of permit applications or granting water or mineral concessions, erection of trade barriers, including tariffs and duties, claims by governmental entities or indigenous communities, changes to mining and related laws impacting current and future operations, expropriation or nationalization of property and other risks arising out of foreign sovereignty over areas in which our operations are conducted. As an example, as disclosed in Note 1718 -- Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we are currently engaged in efforts to recover amounts unduly paid to the Mexican ~~government that are owed to Coeur associated with a prior royalty agreement covering gold production at Palmarejo, including~~

government that are owed to Coeur associated with a prior royalty agreement covering gold production at Palmarejo, including through international arbitration. While the Company believes that it remains legally entitled to be refunded the full amount of the unduly paid VAT receivable and intends to rigorously continue its recovery efforts, based on the continued failure to recover the receivable and unfavorable Mexican court decisions, the Company determined to write down the carrying value of the receivable of $26.0 million at September 2021. In addition, recent amendments to mining, water and environmental laws in Mexico, and recent government actions under the prior Mexican administration intended to slow or halt the normal processing of permits and granting of water or mineral concessions, could impose additional restrictions on our ability to obtain and maintain mining and water rights and operate in Mexico, among other potentially adverse provisions. The main operating permit at Palmarejo expires in October 2025. We filed a routine application to extend the permit in the ordinary course, which the environmental authorities under the prior administration did not act upon, consistent with prior administration policy. Since President Claudia Sheinbaum took office on October 1, 2024, we have seen indications of a return to normal processing of permits, and we are engaging with the government to gain approval for the extension of the permit, but there can be no assurance as to whether or when we will receive it. The right to import and export gold and silver may depend on obtaining certain licenses and quotas, which could be delayed or denied at the discretion of the relevant regulatory authorities, or could become subject to new taxes, tariffs or duties imposed by U.S. or foreign jurisdictions, as well as other actions taken in potential trade disputes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or future prospects. In addition, our rights under local law may be less secure in countries where judicial systems are susceptible to manipulation and intimidation by government agencies, non-governmental organizations or civic groups.

Any of these developments could require us to curtail or terminate operations at our mines, incur significant costs to renegotiate contracts, meet newly-imposed environmental or other standards, pay greater royalties or higher prices for labor or services and recognize higher taxes, address aggressive or punitive tax audit assessments including through litigation, or experience significant delays or obstacles in the recovery of VAT or income tax refunds owed, which could materially and adversely affect financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our operations outside the United States also expose us to economic and operational risks.

Our operations outside the United States also expose us to economic and operational risks. Local economic conditions, as well as epidemics, pandemics or natural disasters, can cause shortages of skilled workers and supplies, increase costs and adversely affect the security of operations. In addition, higher incidences of criminal activity and violence in the area of some of our foreign operations, including drug cartel-related violence in Mexico, could adversely affect our ability to operate in an optimal fashion and may impose greater risks of extortion and theft, greater risks to our personnel and property, greater risks to the transport of materials to refineries, and greater risks to the supply of services and goods to our operations, including specialized equipment. These conditions, including security concerns in certain communities surrounding the Palmarejo complex impacting third-party deliveries of supplies to Palmarejo, could adversely impact our operations and lead to lower productivity and higher costs, which would adversely affect results of operations and cash flows. ~~Furthermore, with the completion of the SilverCrest Transaction, the Company’s exposure to such risks is expected to increase due to the addition of the Las Chispas operation in Mexico.~~

In addition, acts of civil disobedience are not uncommon in certain areas of Mexico where our operations or projects are located. In recent years, many mining companies have been the targets of actions to restrict their legally entitled access to mining concessions or property. Such acts of civil disobedience often occur without warning and can result in significant direct and indirect costs. We cannot provide assurance that there will be no disruptions to site access in the future, which could adversely affect our business.

We sell gold doré, gold concentrate, silver doré and silver concentrate in U.S. dollars, but we conduct operations outside the United States in local currency. Currency exchange movements could also adversely affect our results of operations.

Our success depends on developing and maintaining relationships with local communities and other stakeholders.

Our ongoing and future success depends on developing and maintaining productive relationships with the communities surrounding our operations, including indigenous peoples who may have rights or may assert rights to certain of our properties, and other stakeholders in our operating locations. We believe our operations can provide valuable benefits to surrounding communities, including through direct employment, training and skills development and other benefits associated with ongoing payment of taxes. In addition, we seek to maintain our partnerships and relationships with local communities, including indigenous peoples, and stakeholders in a variety of ways, including in-kind contributions, volunteer time, sponsorships and donations. There is an increasing level of public concern relating to the perceived effect of mining activities on indigenous communities. Evolving expectations related to human rights, indigenous interests and environmental protection may result in opposition to the Company’s current or future activities. Notwithstanding our ongoing efforts, local communities and stakeholders could become dissatisfied with our activities or the level of benefits provided, which may result in legal or administrative proceedings, civil unrest, protests, direct action or campaigns against us or our operations. Any such occurrences could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, the growing use of social media to generate, publish and discuss community news and issues and to connect with others has made it significantly easier, among other things, for individuals and groups to share their opinions and information about our business and activities, whether true or not. We do not have direct control over how we are perceived by others and any resulting loss of reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

In addition, the growing use of social media to generate, publish and discuss community news and issues and to connect with others has made it significantly easier, among other things, for individuals and groups to share their opinions of our business and our activities, whether true or not. We do not have direct control over how we are perceived by others and any resulting loss of reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

Our mining assets are subject to geotechnical and hydrological risks, and a related incident could materially and adversely impact our production, profitability and financial condition, as well as the value of our common stock.

Our mining assets are subject to geotechnical and hydrological risks which could impact the structural integrity of our mines, stockpiles, leach pads and tailings storage facilities. No assurances can be given that unanticipated adverse geotechnical and hydrological conditions, such as landslides, pit wall failures or tailings dam instability will not occur in the future or that such events will be detected in advance. Geotechnical and hydrological instabilities can be difficult to predict and are often affected by risks and hazards outside of our control, such as severe weather and considerable rainfall, which may lead to periodic floods, mudslides, wall instability and seismic activity, which may result in slippage of material. The occurrence of significant leach pad failures at third-party sites in recent years may result in the introduction of additional laws and regulations, which could result in additional operational and compliance costs for our sites. Some of these risks may be heightened further by the remote location of our operations.

Waste rock in the form of tailings generated as a by-product of processed ore is produced at the Kensington and Palmarejo mines. We place tailings into engineered containments, underground as structural backfill, and as thickened ~~tailing~~tailings into a former open pit. In response to several recent tailings ~~dam~~facility failures at third-party operations that have involved loss of life and resulted in severe property and environmental ecosystem damage, we completed a comprehensive review of our tailings ~~dams~~facilities and operational practices to characterize our risk profile. We concluded that our tailings ~~dams~~facilities represent a low exposure risk profile for several reasons, including that our tailings ~~dams~~facilities were constructed using construction methods recognized in the industry as the most stable tailings ~~dam~~facility design using high strength and chemically stable rock in construction. Our ~~dams~~facilities are continuously monitored and inspected by internal resources as well as third-party industry qualified experts. The significant dam failure events at third-party locations that have occurred in recent years may lead to regulatory governance changes stemming from updated laws, regulation or guidance, which could result in increased operational and compliance costs if we need to make changes to existing facilities. The failure of a tailings ~~dam or tailings storage~~ facility at one of our mine sites could result in severe, and in some cases catastrophic, property and environmental damage and loss of life. Geotechnical or hydrological failures could result in limited or restricted access to mine sites, suspension of operations, government investigations, fines and penalties, lawsuits filed by parties who suffer injuries or property damage from such events, increased monitoring costs, remediation costs, loss of mineral reserves and resources and other impacts, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position as well as the value of our common stock.

Our estimates of future production, costs, expenditures and financial results are imprecise, depend upon subjective factors, may not be realized in actual production and such estimates speak only as of their respective dates.

We have in the past, and may in the future, provide estimates and projections of our future production, costs, expenditures and financial results. Any such information is forward-looking. Neither our independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, do not express any opinion or any other form of assurance on these estimates and projections. Estimates and projections are made by our management and technical personnel and are qualified by, and subject to the assumptions contained or referenced in the filing, release or presentation in which they are made, including assumptions about the availability, accessibility, sufficiency and quality of mineralization, recovery rates, our costs of production, the market prices of gold and silver, our ability to sustain and increase production levels, the ability to produce and sell marketable concentrates and dorés and related treatment and refining charges, the sufficiency of our infrastructure, the performance of our personnel and equipment, our ability to maintain and obtain mining interests and permits, the state of government and community relations, and our compliance with existing and future laws and regulations. We sometimes state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to represent that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. Actual results and experience may differ materially from these assumptions. Any production, cost, expenditure or financial results estimates speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we disclaim any intent or obligation to update such estimates, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, these forward-looking statements should be considered in the context in which they are made, and undue reliance should not be placed on them.

Our use of derivative contracts to protect against market price volatility exposes us to risk of opportunity loss, mark-to-market fair value adjustments, potential cash collateral calls and exposure to counterparty credit risk.

We have in the past, and may in the future, enter into price risk management contracts to protect against fluctuations in the price of gold and silver, foreign currency rates and changes in the prices of fuel and other input costs. These contracts could include forward sales or purchase contracts, futures contracts, purchased or sold put and call options and other derivative instruments. We entered into price risk management contracts on certain gold and silver sales in 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. We determined to implement these contracts to provide for a minimum level of revenue from the sales of the covered gold and silver ounces in order to mitigate the risk of not being able to fund all or a portion of the costs of several significant projects at our existing operations, such as the Rochester expansion, as well as provide greater certainty in our planning and budgeting

instruments. We entered into price risk management contracts on certain gold and silver sales in 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. We determined to implement these contracts to provide for a minimum level of revenue from the sales of the covered gold and silver ounces in order to mitigate the risk of not being able to fund all or a portion of the costs of several significant projects at our existing operations, such as the Rochester expansion, as well as provide greater certainty in our planning and budgeting process. AsThe ~~of December 31, 2024, no forward contracts remained outstanding but the~~ Company ~~did~~acquired ~~acquire~~ existing zero cost collar hedges for 1,600 ounces of gold and 200,000 ounces of silver on February 14, 2025 as part of ~~its~~the ~~acquisition of~~ SilverCrest Transaction. These hedges ~~settle~~settled monthly through March 2025. As of December 31, 2025, no forward contracts remained outstanding. See Note 1314 — Derivative Financial Instruments & Hedging Activities in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The use of derivative instruments can expose us to risk of an opportunity loss and may also result in significant mark-to-market fair value adjustments, which may require us to post cash or other collateral or have a material adverse impact on reported financial results. Our exposure may be particularly acute for our derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges because those contracts are cash net settled on a monthly basis. We are exposed to credit risk with contract counterparties, including, but not limited to, sales contracts and derivative contracts. In the event of nonperformance in connection with a contract, we could be exposed to a loss of value for that contract.

We are dependent upon information technology and operational technology, including technology that incorporates artificial intelligence (“AI”), which are subject to cybersecurity incidents, disruption, damage, failure and other risks associated with implementation and integration.

The information technology and operational technology used in our business and operations are subject to disruption, damage or failure from a variety of sources, including, without limitation, malicious AI usage or misuse of AI, computer viruses, security breaches, cyberattacks, natural disasters and defects in design. Cybersecurity incidents, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data or machines and equipment, other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information, and the corruption of data or the disabling, misuse or malfunction of machines and equipment. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to information technology, operational technology and network disruptions. However, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of information or operational technology disruptions, we could potentially be subject to production downtimes, operational delays, operating accidents, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems, equipment and networks or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on cash flows, financial condition or results of operations. We may also incur large expenditures to recover data, to repair or replace networks or information or to protect against similar future events.

We could also be adversely affected by system or network disruptions if new or upgraded information technology systems are defective, not installed properly or not properly integrated into operations. Various measures have been implemented to manage the risks related to the system implementation and modification, but system modification failures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations. Although the Company has not experienced any material loss to date relating to cybersecurity, there can be no assurance that the Company will not incur such loss in the future. We carry cybersecurity insurance; however, it may not be sufficient to cover losses arising from cybersecurity incidents that may occur.

There has been heightened legislative and regulatory focus on data privacy, cybersecurity and ~~cybersecurity~~AI usage and compliance in the U.S and elsewhere. We may be required to comply with a fast-evolving set of legal requirements in this area, including substantive data privacy, cybersecurity and ~~cybersecurity~~AI standards. This regulatory environment may present material obligations and risks to our business, including significantly expanded compliance burdens, costs and enforcement risks.

We may be expected to continue enhancing our ~~ESG~~sustainability practices to meet evolving and inconsistent standards.

~~ESG~~Environmental sustainability factors, including water stewardship, biodiversity and climate-related initiatives such as GHG emissions targets and climate risk management, are a metric used by many institutional investors to review and assess the performance of the Company and a significant factor in their investment decisions. We believe we have established ourselves as a leader among peers in ~~ESG~~this area and continued to advance our ~~ESG~~sustainability initiatives, and have adopted specific, objective goals such as continuing to improve our industry-leading safety record, reducing the net intensity of our GHG emissions across the Company, advancing our commitment to an inclusive culture to attract and retain the workforce we need today and in the future, strengthening community relations and protecting critical habitat. However, there are no assurances that our efforts will be sufficient or meet the standards set by ~~ESG~~third-party analysts or institutional or other investors.

Our operations may be disrupted, and our financial results may be adversely affected by an outbreak of infectious disease or pandemic.

An outbreak of infectious disease, pandemic or a similar public health threat, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and the response thereto, could adversely impact our business and operations. If a significant portion of our workforce becomes unable to work or travel to our operations due to illness or government restrictions (including travel restrictions and “shelter-in-place” and similar orders restricting certain activities that may be issued or extended by authorities), we may be forced to reduce or suspend operations at one or more of our mines, which could reduce production, limit exploration activities and development

to work or travel to our operations due to illness or government restrictions (including travel restrictions and “shelter-in-place” and similar orders restricting certain activities that may be issued or extended by authorities), we may be forced to reduce or suspend operations at one or more of our mines, which could reduce production, limit exploration activities and development projects and impact liquidity and financial results. While we have implemented several initiatives to protect the health and safety of our employees, contractors and communities to date, some of which have and may result in additional costs to us, there can be no assurance that the Company will remain unaffected by potential future health crises.

Public health threats and related government restrictions, including potential closure of national borders, may disrupt the supply of raw goods, equipment, supplies and services upon which our operations rely.

Third parties with whom we conduct business, including the refiners and smelters that process and, in some cases, purchase the doré and concentrate produced by our mines, are also subject to these risks and may be required to reduce or suspend operations, which could impact our ability to conduct our operations, advance exploration, development and expansion projects, or sell our products and generate revenues.

To the extent any pandemic or other public health threat adversely affects our business and financial results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this Item 1A, such as those relating to our operations and indebtedness and financing. Because of the highly uncertain and dynamic nature of events pandemics and other public health threats, it is not possible to estimate the full potential impact on our business. However, these effects could have a material impact on our business and results of operations or financial condition.

Our business depends on good relations with, and the retention and hiring of, personnel.

We may experience labor disputes, work stoppages or other disruptions in production that could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Labor disruptions may be used to advocate labor, political or social goals, particularly at non-U.S. mines. For example, labor disruptions may occur in sympathy with strikes or labor unrest in other sectors of local economies. We cannot assure that work stoppages, union organizing activities or other disruptions will not occur in the future. Any such work stoppage or disruption could expose us to significant costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We compete with other mining companies to attract and retain key executives, skilled labor, contractors and other employees. We may be unable to continue to attract and retain skilled and experienced employees and contractors, which could have an adverse effect on our competitive position or adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.

Continuation of our mining operations is dependent on the availability of sufficient and affordable water supplies.

Our mining operations require significant quantities of water for mining, ore processing and related support facilities. In particular, our properties in Mexico and Nevada are in areas where water is scarce and competition among users for continuing access to water is significant. Continuous production and mine development is dependent on our ability to acquire and maintain water rights and claims and to defeat claims adverse to current water uses in legal proceedings. For example, in January 2024, the Mexican Supreme Court ~~of Justice of the Nation~~ issued a ruling that invalidated certain non-material surface water rights previously utilized at Palmarejo. Although each of our operating mines currently has sufficient water rights and claims to cover its operational demands, we cannot predict the potential outcome of pending or future legal proceedings relating to enforcement of water rights, claims and uses, or potential pressure from other users of water, government agencies and officials, and/or non-governmental organizations to limit the amount of water made available to or used for mining activities, regardless of legally valid water rights.

Water shortages may also result from weather or environmental and climate impacts outside of our control. Shortages in water supply could result in interruptions to production and processing activities. In addition, the scarcity of water in certain regions could result in increased costs to obtain sufficient quantities of water to conduct our operations. The loss of some or all water rights, ongoing litigation to enforce existing water rights, ongoing shortages of water to which we have rights and/or significantly higher costs to obtain sufficient quantities of water could result in our inability to maintain production at current or expected levels, require us to curtail or shut down mining operations or could prevent us from pursuing expansion or development opportunities, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Laws and regulations may be introduced in the jurisdictions in which we operate which could also limit access to sufficient water resources, adversely affecting our existing operations or our expansion or development plans.

We may not be able to recognize the benefits of deferred tax assets.

We have accrued deferred tax assets in various jurisdictions from past operating losses, but may not be able to utilize part or all of these assets in the future. We recognize the expected future tax benefit from these assets only if it is considered more likely than not that the tax benefit will be realized. Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied against deferred tax assets that are not more likely than not to be utilized. Assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income, including application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction, assumptions about future metals prices, the macroeconomic environment and results of our operations. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, our ability to realize deferred tax assets

significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income, including application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction, assumptions about future metals prices, the macroeconomic environment and results of our operations. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, our ability to realize deferred tax assets could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws or changed interpretations or applications of relevant laws by government agencies – even if contrary to existing legal precedent or punitive in nature – could limit our ability to realize the future benefits represented by our deferred tax assets and annual limitations may impact the timeframe over which the net operating loss carryforwards can be used, potentially impacting cash tax liabilities in a future period.

RISKS RELATED TO INDEBTEDNESS AND FINANCING

Our future operating performance may not generate cash flows sufficient to meet debt payment obligations.

As of December 31, ~~2024~~2025, we had approximately $~~590~~340.15 million of outstanding indebtedness. Our ability to make scheduled debt payments on outstanding indebtedness will depend on future results of operations and cash flows. Our results of operations and cash flows, in part, are subject to economic factors beyond our control, including the market prices of gold and silver, among other factors described in this Item. Although we have been successful in repaying or refinancing debt historically, there can be no assurance that we can continue to do so. We may not be able to generate enough cash flow to meet obligations and commitments under outstanding debt instruments.

If and to the extent liquidity resources are insufficient to support short- and long-term expenditures, we could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures, dispose of material assets or operations, incur additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We cannot predict whether we would be able to refinance debt, issue equity or debt securities or dispose of assets to raise funds on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company. In a rising interest rate environment, the costs of borrowing additional funds or refinancing outstanding indebtedness would also be expected to increase. The agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness restrict our ability to dispose of certain assets and use the proceeds from those dispositions and may also restrict our ability to raise debt or equity capital to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain proceeds in an amount sufficient to meet any debt service obligations then due.

The terms of our debt impose restrictions on our operations.

The agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness include a number of significant negative covenants. These covenants, among other things:

•limit our ability to obtain additional financing, repurchase outstanding equity or issue debt securities;

•require us to meet certain financial covenants including a senior secured leverage ratio, a consolidated net leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio;

•require a portion of our cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, which reduces the amount of cash flows available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

•limit our ability to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets, enter into transactions with and invest capital in affiliates, enter into agreements restricting our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends, consolidate, amalgamate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets;

•increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

•limit our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which we compete; and

•place us at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors.

A breach of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under the applicable agreement governing our outstanding indebtedness that, if not cured or waived, could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to the debt to be due and payable immediately. Acceleration of any debt could result in cross-defaults under our other debt instruments. Our inability to meet any of these covenants may also result in a lender requiring us to agree to additional restrictive covenants which may, among other things, limit our ability to fund our existing operations or incur additional indebtedness. Our assets and cash flow may be insufficient to repay borrowings fully under all of our outstanding debt instruments if any of our debt instruments are accelerated upon an event of default, which could force the Company into bankruptcy or liquidation.

Any downgrade in the credit ratings assigned to us or our debt securities could increase future borrowing costs, adversely affect the availability of new financing and may result in increased collateral requirements under our existing surety bond portfolio.

There can be no assurance that any rating currently assigned by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services or Moody’s Investors Service to us or our debt securities will remain unchanged for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered if, in that rating agency’s judgment, future circumstances relating to the basis of the rating so warrant. For example, rating agencies may reevaluate Coeur’s credit ratings following the consummation of the SilverCrest Transaction. Factors that may impact Coeur's credit ratings following consummation of the SilverCrest Transaction include debt levels, planned asset purchases or sales and near-term and long-term production growth, opportunities, liquidity, asset quality, cost structure, product mix and commodity pricing levels. Likewise, if we are unable to maintain our outstanding debt and financial ratios at levels acceptable to the credit rating agencies, or should our business prospects or financial results deteriorate, including as a result of declines in gold or silver prices or other factors beyond our control, our ratings could be downgraded by the rating agencies. A downgrade by the rating agencies could adversely affect the value of our outstanding debt securities, our existing debt, and our ability to obtain new financing on favorable terms, if at all, may increase borrowing costs, and may result in increased collateral requirements under our existing surety bond portfolio, which in turn may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.19

There can be no assurance that any rating currently assigned by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services or Moody’s Investors Service to us or our debt securities will remain unchanged for any given period of time or that a rating will not be lowered if, in that rating agency’s judgment, future circumstances relating to the basis of the rating so warrant. For example, rating agencies may reevaluate Coeur’s credit ratings following the consummation of the New Gold Transaction. Factors that may impact Coeur's credit ratings with the consummation of the New Gold Transaction include debt levels, planned asset purchases or sales and near-term and long-term production growth, opportunities, liquidity, asset quality, cost structure, product mix and commodity pricing levels. Likewise, if we are unable to maintain our outstanding debt and financial ratios at levels acceptable to the credit rating agencies, or should our business prospects or financial results deteriorate, including as a result of declines in gold or silver prices or other factors beyond our control, our ratings could be downgraded by the rating agencies. A downgrade by the rating agencies could adversely affect the value of our outstanding debt securities, our existing debt, and our ability to obtain new financing on favorable terms, if at all, may increase borrowing costs, and may result in increased collateral requirements under our existing surety bond portfolio, which in turn may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

RISKS RELATED TO APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

We are subject to significant governmental regulations, including the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Act, the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines under the British Columbia Mines Act and Relevant Sections of the Mexican Official Regulations, and related costs and delays associated with compliance may negatively affect our business.

Mining activities are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing environmental protection, natural resources, prospecting, development, production, post-closure reclamation, taxes, labor standards and occupational health and safety, including mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. The costs associated with compliance with such laws and regulations are substantial. Changes in existing laws, possible future laws and regulations, or more restrictive interpretations of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions on or suspensions of operations and delays in the development of new properties.

U.S. surface and underground mines like the Kensington, Rochester and Wharf mines are regularly inspected by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”). These inspections may lead to written citations or violation notices, which are reported in Exhibit 95.1 to this Report. Recently, MSHA has been conducting more comprehensive inspections of mining operations in general, focusing on miner health and critical safety hazards. Similar inspections are conducted ~~in British Columbia, Canada,~~ at the Silvertip exploration property in British Columbia, Canada by the British Columbia Ministry of Mining and Critical Minerals, ~~and~~ in Mexico at the Palmarejo complex and Las Chispas mine by the Mexican Secretaria del Trabajo y Prevision Social (Secretary of Labor and Social Safety).

Recent amendments to mining, water and environmental laws in Mexico, and the subsequent corresponding regulations thereto, could impose additional restrictions on our ability to obtain and maintain mining and water rights and operate in Mexico, among other potentially adverse provisions. Legal actions challenging the validity and implementation of these recent amendments have been filed by various groups and the proceedings remain ongoing.

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in temporary or extended shutdowns, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, which may require corrective measures, including the payment of fines or penalties, capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions, any of which could have a material, adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Compliance with environmental regulations and litigation based on environmental regulations could require significant expenditures.

Environmental regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards, land development and land reclamation, and set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation and environmental justice provisions are evolving in a manner that may require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for mining companies and their officers, directors and employees. We may incur environmental costs that could have a material adverse effect on financial condition and results of operations. Any failure to remedy an environmental problem could require us to suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remedy. The environmental standards that ultimately may be imposed at a mine site affect the cost of remediation and could exceed the financial accruals that we have made for such remediation. The potential exposure may be significant and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

~~The~~conducted ~~potential~~by ~~exposure~~other ~~may~~mining becompanies ~~significant~~many ~~and~~years ago on properties that we currently or previously owned. These lawsuits could lead to the imposition of substantial fines, remediation costs, penalties and other civil and criminal sanctions. Substantial costs and liabilities, including for restoring the environment after the closure of mines, are inherent in our operations. We cannot assure that any such law, regulation, enforcement or private claim would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, ~~and~~ results of operations or cash flows.

Moreover, governmental authorities and private parties may bring lawsuits based upon damage to property and injury to persons resulting from the environmental, health and safety impacts of prior and current operations, including operations conducted by other mining companies many years ago on properties that we currently or previously owned. These lawsuits could lead to the imposition of substantial fines, remediation costs, penalties and other civil and criminal sanctions. Substantial costs and liabilities, including for restoring the environment after the closure of mines, are inherent in our operations. We cannot assure that any such law, regulation, enforcement or private claim would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Some of the mining waste from our U.S. mines currently are exempt to a limited extent from the extensive set of EPA regulations governing hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”). If the EPA were to repeal this exemption and designate these mining wastes as hazardous under RCRA, we would be required to make significant expenditures to manage the waste and to construct hazardous waste storage or disposal facilities. Under the Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 (“MEBA”), incidental elemental mercury generated at our Rochester mine as part of the processing of ore may not be exported outside of the United States and is required to be stored in a facility designated by the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) for long-term mercury management. The DOE is undergoing processes to designate such a facility and to establish storage and handling fees, which is not yet final. The outcome could result in material cost being incurred to ship and store mercury from our Rochester operation. In addition, if any of these wastes causes contamination in or damage to the environment at a U.S. mining facility, that facility could be designated as a “Superfund” site under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). Under CERCLA, any present owner or operator of a Superfund site or the owner or operator at the time of contamination may be held jointly and severally liable regardless of fault and may be forced to undertake extensive remedial cleanup action or to pay for the cleanup efforts. The owner or operator also may be liable to federal, state and tribal/indigenous governmental entities for the cost of damages to natural resources, which could be substantial. Additional regulations or requirements also are imposed on our tailings and waste disposal areas in Alaska under the federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”), in Nevada under the Nevada Water Pollution Control Law which implements the CWA, in South Dakota under the South Dakota Water Pollution Control Act and the Administrative Rules of the State of South Dakota, in British Columbia (Canada) under the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia, the British Columbia Environmental Management Act and the Canadian Metal and Diamond Mining Effluent Regulations, and in Mexico under the General Law of Ecological Balance and Protection of the Environment (the “GLEBPE”) and the regulations under the GLEBPE related to environmental protection in impact assessment matters.

Airborne emissions are subject to controls under air pollution statutes implementing the Clean Air Act in the U.S. and are regulated under the Environmental Management Act in British Columbia (Canada) and the GLEBPE and the regulations under GLEBPE related to prevention and control of the pollution of the atmosphere in Mexico. In addition, there are numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives related to climate change, reductions in ~~greenhouse~~GHG ~~gas~~ emissions, or energy policy and adoption of these initiatives through legislative actions or administrative policy could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and cash flows. However, we are unable to predict the scope, nature and timing of any new or increased environmental laws and regulations and therefore cannot predict the ultimate impact of such laws and regulations on our business or financial results. We continue to monitor existing and proposed laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate to consider actions we may take to potentially mitigate any unfavorable impact of such laws or regulations.

In addition, U.S. environmental conservation efforts could result in the withdrawal of certain federal lands from mineral entry under relevant mining law, which could have the effect of restricting our current or future planned activities involving our unpatented mining claims on the affected public lands.

We are required to obtain and renew governmental permits in order to conduct operations, a process which is often costly and time-consuming. Our ability to obtain necessary government permits to expand operations or begin new operations may be materially affected by third-party activists.

In the normal course of our business, we are required to obtain and renew governmental permits for exploration, operations and expansion of existing operations and for the development of new projects, such as the permits recently obtained for the Rochester expansion, POA 1 at Kensington and ~~at Palmarejo to allow~~ the ~~deposit~~main ofoperating ~~future~~permit ~~tailings~~at ~~into the legacy open pit rather than expanding the current tailings impoundment facility~~Palmarejo. Obtaining and renewing governmental permits is a complex and time-consuming process. The timeliness and success of permitting efforts are contingent upon many variables not within our control, including the interpretation of permit approval requirements administered by the applicable permitting authority and government and third-party sentiment towards the mining industry generally. We may not be able to obtain or renew permits that are necessary to our operations, or the cost and time required to obtain or renew permits may exceed our expectations. Any unexpected delays or costs associated with the permitting process could impede or delay the development or operation of a mine, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and future growth. ~~For~~Any ~~example,~~delay asin ~~noted~~obtaining ~~above,~~a wepermit ~~are~~may ~~working~~require ~~through~~us ato ~~prolonged~~revise ~~delay~~mine inplans ~~the~~or ~~routine~~curtail ~~renewal~~expected production, which could have a material adverse effect on results of ~~our~~operations ~~main~~and ~~operating~~cash ~~permit~~flow. atIn ~~Palmarejo~~addition, key permits and approvals may be revoked or suspended or may be changed in a manner that adversely affects our operations.

~~which~~hearings ~~expires~~and incostly ~~October 2025~~undertakings. AsThese ~~has~~third-party ~~been~~actions ~~publicized~~can inmaterially ~~media~~increase ~~coverage,~~the wecosts ~~understand~~and ~~that~~cause ~~other~~delays ~~mining projects~~ in ~~Mexico~~the ~~have also experienced extended~~ permitting ~~delays~~process ~~or,~~and incould ~~certain~~cause ~~circumstances,~~us ~~denials of permits, due~~ to ~~anti-mining~~not ~~policies~~proceed ofwith the ~~prior~~development ~~Mexican~~or ~~administration~~expansion ~~which~~of ~~just~~a ~~ended~~mine. onIn ~~October 1~~addition, ~~2024.~~our ~~Our~~ability ~~early~~to ~~engagements~~successfully ~~with~~obtain ~~the~~key ~~new~~permits ~~Mexican~~and ~~administration~~approvals ~~indicate~~to ~~normal~~explore ~~processing~~for ofminerals ~~permits~~and ~~may~~to ~~be resuming~~develop, ~~but~~operate ~~there~~and ~~can~~expand bemines, noas ~~assurance~~well as to ~~when~~conduct orour ~~whether~~operations, ~~the Palmarejo permit extension~~ will belikely ~~granted.~~depend ~~Any~~on ~~delay~~our inability ~~obtaining a permit may require us~~ to ~~revise~~develop, ~~mine~~operate, ~~plans~~expand orand ~~curtail~~close ~~expected~~mines ~~production,~~in ~~which~~a ~~could~~manner ~~have~~that ais ~~material~~consistent ~~adverse~~with ~~effect~~the oncreation ~~results~~ of ~~operations~~social and ~~cash~~economic ~~flow.~~benefits Inin ~~addition,~~the ~~key~~surrounding ~~permits~~communities, ~~and~~which ~~approvals~~ may ~~be revoked~~ or ~~suspended or~~ may not be ~~changed~~required inby ~~a manner that adversely affects our operations~~law. ~~For~~Our ~~example,~~ability ~~we recently received a notice of revocation of our permit~~ to ~~operate~~obtain ~~back-up~~permits ~~generators~~and atapprovals ~~Palmarejo. We are appealing the revocation~~ and ~~have been granted the right~~ to ~~continue~~successfully ~~operating~~operate ~~the~~in ~~back-up~~particular ~~generators~~communities ~~during~~may ~~the~~be ~~course~~adversely ofimpacted ~~the~~by ~~appeal.~~real Weor ~~are~~perceived ~~also~~detrimental ~~applying~~events ~~for~~associated awith ~~new permit in case~~ our ~~appeal~~activities isor ~~not~~those ~~successful,~~of ~~but~~other ~~there~~mining ~~can~~companies beaffecting ~~no assurance that~~ the ~~revocation~~environment, ofhuman ~~the~~health ~~prior~~and ~~permit~~safety ~~will~~of ~~not~~communities ~~have~~in anwhich ~~adverse~~we ~~impact on Palmarejo’s operating and financial results~~operate.

Private parties such as environmental activists frequently attempt to intervene in the permitting process and to persuade regulators to deny necessary permits or seek to overturn permits that have been issued. Obtaining the necessary governmental permits is a complex and time-consuming process involving numerous jurisdictions and often involving public hearings and costly undertakings. These third-party actions can materially increase the costs and cause delays in the permitting process and could cause us to not proceed with the development or expansion of a mine. In addition, our ability to successfully obtain key permits and approvals to explore for minerals and to develop, operate and expand mines, as well as to conduct our operations, will likely depend on our ability to develop, operate, expand and close mines in a manner that is consistent with the creation of social and economic benefits in the surrounding communities, which may or may not be required by law. Our ability to obtain permits and approvals and to successfully operate in particular communities may be adversely impacted by real or perceived detrimental events associated with our activities or those of other mining companies affecting the environment, human health and safety of communities in which we operate.

Our business is subject to anti-bribery laws, a breach or violation of which could lead to civil and criminal fines and penalties, loss of licenses or permits and reputational harm.

We operate in certain jurisdictions that have experienced governmental and private sector corruption. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as well as Canadian and Mexican anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or other commercial advantage. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could lead to civil and criminal fines and penalties, litigation, and loss of operating licenses or permits, and may damage our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and other corporate policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, and we provide training and education on these topics to our employees; however, there can be no assurance that our internal control policies and procedures always will protect us from recklessness, fraudulent behavior, dishonesty or other inappropriate acts or violations of laws committed by our affiliates, employees or agents.

We are subject to litigation and may be subject to additional litigation in the future.

We are currently, and may in the future become, subject to other litigation, arbitration ~~(including the current NAFTA arbitration matter involving recovery of amounts unduly paid as VAT in Mexico)~~ or proceedings with other parties. If decided adversely to us, these legal proceedings, or others that could be brought against us in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or prospects. Responding to disputes, even those that are without merit or ultimately decided in our favor, may require us to incur significant expense, devote significant resources, and may generate adverse publicity, which could materially and adversely affect our business. In the event of a dispute arising at our foreign operations, we may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or arbitral panels or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts or arbitral panels in the United States. Our inability to enforce our rights and the enforcement of rights on a prejudicial basis by foreign courts or arbitral panels could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Disputes regarding our mining claims, concessions or surface rights to land in the vicinity of our mining projects could adversely impact operations.

The validity of exploration or mining claims, concessions or rights, which constitute most of our property holdings, is often uncertain and may be contested. We have used commercially reasonable efforts, in accordance with industry standards, to investigate our title or claims to our various properties, however, no assurance can be given that applicable governments will not revoke or significantly alter the conditions of the applicable exploration or mining claims, concessions or rights, or that such exploration or mining claims, concessions or rights will not be challenged by third parties. Although we have attempted to acquire satisfactory title to undeveloped properties, in accordance with mining industry practice, we do not generally obtain title opinions until a decision is made to develop a property. As a result, some titles may be defective, particularly titles to undeveloped properties. Defective title to any of our exploration or mining claims, concessions or rights could result in litigation, insurance claims and potential losses affecting our business as a whole. There may be challenges to the title of any of the claims, concessions or rights comprising our projects that, if successful, could impair development and operations. A defect could result in us losing all or a portion of our right, title, estate and interest in and to the properties to which the title defect relates.

22In Mexico, while mineral rights are administered by the federal government through federally issued mining concessions, federally recognized agrarian communities called ejidos control surface or surface access rights to their land. An ejido may sell or lease lands directly to a private entity. While we have agreements with the ejidos that impact all of our projects in Mexico, some of these agreements may be subject to renegotiation or legal challenges.

the claims, concessions or rights comprising our projects that, if successful, could impair development and operations. A defect could result in us losing all or a portion of our right, title, estate and interest in and to the properties to which the title defect relates.

In Mexico, while mineral rights are administered by the federal government through federally issued mining concessions, federally recognized agrarian communities called ejidos control surface or surface access rights to the land. An ejido may sell or lease lands directly to a private entity. While we have agreements or are in the process of negotiating agreements with the ejidos that impact all of our projects in Mexico, some of these agreements may be subject to renegotiation or legal challenges.

The Company’s effective tax rate could be volatile and materially change as a result of changes in tax laws, mix of earnings and other factors.

We are subject to tax laws in the United States, Mexico, Canada and ~~several~~other foreign jurisdictions. Changes in fiscal and tax policies, including new tax legislation and reform to existing policy, may have a significant negative impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.

Additionally, the jurisdictions in which we operate have and may in the future continue to encounter financial difficulties resulting from one or both of lower tax revenue and new and increased costs. National, state or local governments may seek to raise existing taxes or introduce new taxes, which may adversely affect our business and financial results.

Currently, the Company incurs losses in certain countries where it does not receive a financial statement benefit, and the Company operates in countries which have different statutory rates. Consequently, changes in the mix and source of earnings between countries could have a material impact on the Company’s overall effective tax rate.

In addition, new tax legislation in certain jurisdictions where we operate could negatively affect us. For example, in Nevada, where the Rochester mine is located, in response to a significant loss of tourism and gaming revenue as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, in June 2021, the Governor signed into law a new excise tax on gross proceeds derived from mining gold and silver. In late 2024, Mexico raised taxes (which are labeled as fees) on EBITDA and revenues from gold and silver. It is difficult to predict whether further changes to tax laws in the jurisdictions where we operate will be passed and, if passed, the impact those changes may have on the Company. Any additional taxes imposed on us would adversely affect our financial condition, perhaps materially.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

We have the ability to issue additional equity securities, including in connection with an acquisition of other companies, including the ~~SilverCrest~~anticipated New Gold Transaction, which would lead to dilution of our issued and outstanding common stock and may materially and adversely affect the price of our common stock.

The issuance of additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities, whether to acquire new companies or businesses or for other strategic benefits, would result in dilution of our existing stockholders’ equity ownership. For example, in our ~~recent~~ acquisition of SilverCrest we issued 1.6022 shares of Coeur common stock in exchange for each share of issued and outstanding common stock of SilverCrest, resulting in the issuance of 239,331,799 Coeur common shares. Similarly, as part of the New Gold Transaction, we expect to issue 0.4959 shares of Coeur common stock in exchange for each share of issued and outstanding common stock of New Gold, resulting in the expected issuance of approximately 392,610,973 Coeur common shares. The increase to the number of outstanding shares of Coeur’s common stock may impact the marketplace’s view of Coeur’s common stock and may lead to adverse changes in the stock’s trading volume and trading price.

Additionally, former SilverCrest shareholders who received Coeur common stock in the SilverCrest Transaction and New Gold shareholders who may receive Coeur common stock in the contemplated New Gold Transaction may choose to sell or otherwise dispose of such shares, or Coeur’s historic stockholders may decide to reduce their investment in Coeur as a result of the SilverCrest ~~Transaction~~and New Gold Transactions’s impact to Coeur’s overall investment profile. These sales of our common stock (or the perception that these sales may occur) could have the effect of depressing the market price for our common stock. In addition, Coeur’s financial position with the completion of the ~~SilverCrest~~New Gold Transaction may differ from its financial position before the completion of the ~~SilverCrest~~New Gold Transaction, and the results of Coeur’s operations and cash flows following the completion of the ~~SilverCrest~~New Gold Transaction may be affected by factors different from those affecting its financial position or results of operations and cash flows prior to the ~~SilverCrest~~New Gold Transaction, all of which could adversely affect the market price of Coeur common stock. Accordingly, the market price and performance of Coeur common stock subsequent to the acquisition is likely to be different from the performance of Coeur common stock prior to the ~~SilverCrest~~New Gold Transaction.

Other issuances of Coeur common stock may also adversely affect the price of our common stock. In 2024, the Company completed the exchange of $5.9 million principal amount of its 5.125% Senior Notes (the “Senior Notes”) plus accrued interest for 1.8 million shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share, pursuant to a privately-negotiated agreement with such issuance of common stock made pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements afforded by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In 2024, the Company also entered into subscription agreements with certain Canadian accredited investors for a private placement offering of an aggregate 7.7 million shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per shares, to be issued as “flow-through shares,” as defined in subsection 66(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada).

certain Canadian accredited investors for a private placement offering of an aggregate 7.7 million shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per shares, to be issued as “flow-through shares,” as defined in subsection 66(15) of the Income Tax Act (Canada).

We are authorized to issue, without stockholder approval, 10.0 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series, to establish the number of shares to be included in each series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and relative participating, optional, conversion and other special rights of the shares of each series as well as the qualification, limitations or restrictions on each series. Any series of preferred stock could contain dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences or other rights superior to the rights of holders of our common stock. If we issue additional equity securities, the price of our common stock may be materially and adversely affected.

Holders of our common stock may not receive dividends.

We have not historically declared cash dividends on our common stock. Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such dividends as our Board ~~of Directors~~ may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. We are incorporated in Delaware and governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Delaware law allows a corporation to pay dividends only out of surplus, as determined under Delaware law or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend was declared and for the preceding fiscal year. Under Delaware law, however, we cannot pay dividends out of net profits if, after we pay the dividend, our capital would be less than the capital represented by the outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets. Our ability to pay dividends will be subject to our future earnings, capital requirements and financial condition, as well as our compliance with covenants related to existing or future indebtedness and would only be declared in the discretion of our Board of Directors.

~~RISKS RELATED TO THE RECENT ACQUISITION OF SILVERCREST METALS INC.~~23

Asout ~~disclosed~~of insurplus, ~~this~~as ~~Form~~determined ~~10-K~~under Delaware law or, ~~including~~if inthere ~~Part~~is IIno surplus, ~~Item~~out 7of –net ~~Management’s~~profits ~~Discussion~~for ~~and~~the ~~Analysis~~fiscal ofyear ~~Financial~~in ~~Condition~~which the dividend was declared and ~~Results~~for the preceding fiscal year. Under Delaware law, however, we cannot pay dividends out of ~~Operations~~net profits if, after we pay the ~~Company~~dividend, ~~recently~~our ~~completed~~capital would be less than the ~~SilverCrest~~capital ~~Transaction~~represented by the outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets. AsOur ~~described~~ability into ~~this~~pay ~~Section~~dividends will be subject to our future earnings, capital requirements and ~~below~~financial condition, ~~the~~as ~~SilverCrest~~well ~~Transaction~~as ~~could~~our ~~subject~~compliance uswith covenants related to ~~significant~~existing ~~risks~~or future indebtedness and would only be declared in the discretion of our Board of Directors.

RISKS RELATED TO THE ACQUISITION OF SILVERCREST METALS INC.

As disclosed in this Form 10-K, including in Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Company completed the SilverCrest Transaction in February 2025. As described in this Section and below, the SilverCrest Transaction could subject us to significant risks.

Coeur and SilverCrest may be the targets of legal claims, securities class actions, derivative lawsuits and other claims and negative publicity related to the SilverCrest Transaction.

Coeur and SilverCrest may be the target of lawsuits that could result in significant additional costs related to the SilverCrest Transaction. Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against companies that have entered into an agreement to acquire a public company or to be acquired and may seek additional monetary compensation. Even if the lawsuits are unsuccessful or meritless, significant financial resources and attention from management can be required to defend against these claims, and proceedings may result in significant additional costs or challenges. Such proceedings, among other events, could also subject the Company to negative press coverage or public scrutiny that could impact the Company’s existing business performance and operations, ~~and~~including its ~~integration of the~~ Las Chispas operation.

Coeur is expected to incur significant transaction costs in connection with the SilverCrest Transaction, which may exceed those anticipated by Coeur.

Coeur has incurred and expects to continue incurring costs related to the SilverCrest Transaction, including integration costs. Such fees and expenses include, but are not limited to, financial advisor fees, legal fees, tax and accounting fees, filing and regulatory fees, soliciting fees, and other advisory services fees. Certain of these fees will be incurred after closing of the SilverCrest Transaction, including for the integration of SilverCrest into Coeur. The timing and amount of fees and expenses incurred for the SilverCrest Transaction and post-closing integration of the companies is difficult to predict and may vary significantly from our initial projections.

The combined company may be unable to integrate the businesses of Coeur and SilverCrest successfully or realize the anticipated benefits of the SilverCrest Transaction.

The Company completed the SilverCrest Transaction with the expectation that it will result in certain benefits for the combined company. These anticipated benefits are dependent, in part, on the successful integration of SilverCrest into Coeur, which is a complex process that includes strategic decisions on, among other factors, business strategy, staffing, and system integration. Coeur did not have the ability to exercise control over SilverCrest before the completion of the SilverCrest Transaction and future operating and financial results for the Las Chispas mine may be adversely impacted by events that were outside of our control prior to the completion of the SilverCrest Transaction. Performance may also be adversely impacted if post-closing integration efforts are not able to be achieved in a timely manner or if the efficiencies and benefits contemplated are not able to be realized. Additionally, management focus on integration matters could result in less attention on the Company’s other operations, which could impact the overall performance of the Company.

Parties with which we and SilverCrest conducted business prior to the closing of the SilverCrest Transaction may be subject to disruption as a result of the SilverCrest Transaction. Customers, suppliers and other persons with whom we and

SilverCrest conducted business before consummation of the SilverCrest Transaction may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with us. In addition, our employees and contractors may experience uncertainty about their respective roles with Coeur, which might adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel. Key management and other employees may also be difficult to retain or may become distracted from day-to-day operations because matters related to integration of the Las Chispas operation may require substantial commitments of their time and resources. These disruptions could have an adverse effect on the results of operations, cash flows and financial position of Coeur, including an adverse effect on our ability to realize the expected benefits of the SilverCrest Transaction.

SilverCrest’s public filings are subject to Canadian disclosure standards, which differ from SEC disclosure requirements.

Coeur and SilverCrest report financial results and mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates under different reporting standards. Coeur prepares its financial statements in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”), while SilverCrest prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS Accounting Standards”). Coeur’s mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates have been prepared in accordance with Item 1300 of SEC Regulation S-K, while SilverCrest’s mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). These varying standards embody different approaches and definitions that could require adjustments, reclassifications, or other different treatment as SilverCrest’s financial statements and mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are conformed to the standards applicable to the Company, including U.S. GAAP and Item 1300 of SEC Regulation S-K. Furthermore, we have not been involved in the preparation of SilverCrest’s financial statements or its mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates prior to completion of the SilverCrest Transaction. Although Coeur and its advisors conducted due diligence on SilverCrest, there can be no guarantee that Coeur is aware of all relevant information, including all potential liabilities of SilverCrest. Integration of SilverCrest may pose special risks, including one-time write-offs and unanticipated costs. Mineral reserve and resource estimates may be subject to adjustments that differ from the Company’s current expectations and be impacted by a number of factors, including different engineering and geological interpretations and judgements and different pricing assumptions. As a result, it is possible that certain benefits expected from the combination of Coeur and SilverCrest may not be realized.

RISKS RELATED TO THE ANTICIPATED ACQUISITION OF NEW GOLD INC.

As disclosed in this Form 10-K, including in Part II, Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Company has entered into an definitive agreement (the “Arrangement Agreement”) whereby, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Coeur intends to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of New Gold Inc. (“New Gold”) pursuant to a court-approved plan of arrangement under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the “New Gold Transaction”). As described below, the New Gold Transaction could subject us to significant risks.

The New Gold Transaction is subject to a number of conditions which may not be satisfied or waived, may delay its consummation and could result in additional expenditures of money and resources or reduce the anticipated benefits, or result in termination of the Arrangement Agreement and Coeur having to pay a termination fee.

The New Gold Transaction is conditional upon, among other closing conditions, approval by the Canadian government under the Investment Canada Act. This and other conditions to completion of the New Gold Transaction are not within our control and we cannot be certain when, or if, these conditions will be satisfied. If any of these conditions are not satisfied or waived prior to the outside date set out in the Arrangement Agreement, it is possible that the Arrangement Agreement may be terminated.

Although Coeur and New Gold have, subject to certain limitations, agreed to use reasonable best efforts to complete the New Gold Transaction promptly, these and other conditions may fail to be satisfied. In addition, completion of the New Gold Transaction may take longer and could cost more than we expect. The requirements for obtaining the required regulatory approvals and clearances could delay the completion of the New Gold Transaction for a significant period of time or prevent them from occurring. Any delay in completing the New Gold Transaction may adversely affect the benefits that Coeur expects to achieve if the New Gold Transaction and the integration of businesses were to be completed within the expected timeframe.

Each of Coeur and New Gold has certain rights to terminate the New Gold Transaction in certain circumstances, including if any closing conditions are not satisfied prior to the outside date set out in the Arrangement Agreement. Although the Arrangement Agreement contains customary deal protection provisions, a change in recommendation by either Coeur’s Board of Directors, the New Gold Board of Directors, or both, including as the result of receiving a superior proposal as defined in the Arrangement Agreement, may result in the New Gold Transaction not being consummated. The Arrangement Agreement provides that, upon termination of the Arrangement Agreement under certain circumstances, Coeur would be required to pay New Gold a termination fee of $413 million and reimburse New Gold for expenses incurred in connection with the New Gold Transaction. Failure to complete the New Gold Transaction in a timely manner, or at all, and payment of relevant termination fees, if applicable, could negatively impact Coeur’s business and negatively impact the trading price of Coeur’s common stock.

Coeur and New Gold may be the targets of legal claims, securities class actions, derivative lawsuits and other claims and negative publicity related to the New Gold Transaction.

Coeur and New Gold may be the target of lawsuits that could delay or prevent the New Gold Transaction from being consummated or result in significant additional costs. Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against companies that have entered into an agreement to acquire a public company or to be acquired. Third parties may also attempt to bring claims against Coeur or New Gold in an attempt to delay or block the consummation of the New Gold Transaction or to seek other remedies, including additional monetary compensation. Even if the lawsuits are unsuccessful or meritless, significant financial resources and attention from management can be required to defend against these claims and proceedings may result in a delay to closing the New Gold Transaction. Such proceedings, among other events, could also subject the Company to negative press coverage or public scrutiny that could impact the ability of Coeur and New Gold to consummate the New Gold Transaction, as well as negatively impacting the Company’s existing business performance and operations.

Lawsuits that may be brought against Coeur, New Gold or their respective directors which could seek, among other things, injunctive relief or other equitable relief, including a request to rescind parts of the Arrangement Agreement already implemented and to otherwise enjoin the parties from consummating the Transaction. One of the conditions to the closing of the New Gold Transaction is that no law (including injunction or judgments) is in effect that makes the New Gold Transaction illegal or enjoins or prohibits Coeur or New Gold from consummating the New Gold Transaction. Consequently, if a plaintiff is successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting completion of the New Gold Transaction, that injunction may delay or prevent the New Gold Transaction from being completed within the expected timeframe or at all, which may adversely affect Coeur’s and New Gold respective business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, political and public attitudes towards the New Gold Transaction may result in negative press coverage and other adverse public statements affecting Coeur or New Gold. There is an increasing level of public concern relating to the perceived effect of mining activities on indigenous communities. Local communities and stakeholders could become dissatisfied with our activities or with change in personnel following the Transaction. Adverse press coverage and other adverse statements could lead to investigations by regulators, legislators and law enforcement officials or in legal claims or otherwise negatively impact the ability of the combined company to take advantage of various business and market opportunities. The direct and indirect effects of negative publicity, and the demands of responding to and addressing it, may have a material adverse effect on the combined company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Coeur is expected to incur significant transaction costs in connection with the New Gold Transaction, which may exceed those anticipated by Coeur.

Coeur expects to continue to incur costs related to the New Gold Transaction, as well as additional integration costs if the New Gold Transaction is completed. Such fees and expenses include, but are not limited to, financial advisor fees, legal fees, tax and accounting fees, filing and regulatory fees, soliciting fees, and other advisory services fees. Certain of these fees will be incurred regardless of whether the New Gold Transaction is completed, while additional fees will be incurred after closing of the New Gold Transaction, including for the integration of New Gold into Coeur. The timing and amount of fees and expenses to be incurred for the New Gold Transaction and post-closing integration of the companies is difficult to predict and may vary significantly from our initial projections.

The combined company may be unable to integrate the businesses of Coeur and New Gold successfully or realize the anticipated benefits of the New Gold Transaction.

The Company has entered into the Arrangement Agreement with the expectation that the New Gold Transaction will result in certain benefits for the combined company. These anticipated benefits are dependent, in part, on the successful integration of New Gold into Coeur, which is a complex process that includes strategic decisions on, among other factors, business strategy, staffing, and system integration. Coeur will not have the ability to exercise control over New Gold or its operations until the New Gold Transaction is completed. New Gold’s business and results of operations may be adversely impacted by events that are outside of our control prior to the completion of the New Gold Transaction and may adversely impact integration efforts or the financial results of the combined company after the New Gold Transaction is completed. The combined company’s performance may be adversely impacted if post-closing integration efforts are not able to be achieved in a timely manner or if the efficiencies and benefits contemplated are not able to be realized. Additionally, management focus on integration matters could result in less attention on the Company’s existing operations that could impact the performance of the Company’s existing business.

New Gold’s public filings are subject to Canadian disclosure standards, which differ from SEC disclosure requirements.

Coeur and New Gold report financial results and mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates under different reporting standards. Coeur prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, while New Gold prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards. Coeur’s mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates have been prepared in accordance with Item 1300 of SEC Regulation S-K, while New Gold’s mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101. These varying standards embody different approaches and definitions that could require adjustments, reclassifications, or other different treatment as New Gold’s financial statements and mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are conformed to the standards applicable to the Company, including U.S. GAAP and Item 1300 of SEC Regulation S-K. Although Coeur and its advisors have conducted due diligence on New Gold, there can be no guarantee that Coeur is aware of all relevant information, including all potential liabilities of New Gold. Consummation of the New Gold Transaction and integration of New Gold may pose special risks, including one-time write-offs and unanticipated costs. Mineral reserve and resource estimates may be subject to adjustments that differ from the Company’s current expectations and be impacted by a number of factors, including different engineering and geological interpretations and judgements and different pricing assumptions. As a result, it is possible that certain benefits expected from the combination of Coeur and New Gold may not be realized.

The pendency of the New Gold Transaction may cause disruptions in our business, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Parties with which we and New Gold do business may experience uncertainty associated with the New Gold Transaction, including with respect to current or future business relationships with us, New Gold or the combined company. Our and New Gold’s relationships may be subject to disruption as customers, suppliers and other persons with whom we and New Gold have a business relationship may delay or defer certain business decisions or might decide to seek to terminate, change or renegotiate their relationships with us or New Gold, as applicable, or consider entering into business relationships with parties other than us or New Gold. In addition, our current and prospective associates may experience uncertainty about their future roles, which might adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel and key management and other employees may be difficult to retain or may become distracted from day-to-day operations because matters related to the New Gold Transaction may require substantial commitments of their time and resources. These disruptions could have an adverse effect on the results of operations, cash flows and financial position of Coeur, New Gold or the combined company following the completion of the New Gold Transaction, including an adverse effect on our ability to realize the expected benefits of the New Gold Transaction. The risk, and adverse effect, of any disruption could be exacerbated by a delay in the completion of the New Gold Transaction or the termination of the Arrangement Agreement.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Our cybersecurity program is intended to assess, identify, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats, including those associated with our use of third-party service providers. We integrate cybersecurity into our top-level enterprise risk management (“ERM”) processes and our site-level operational risk management (“ORM”) processes, including management of operational technology (“OT”) cybersecurity risks. This involves, in part, direct engagement by, and consultation with, our ~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President, ~~of Cybersecurity and~~ IT ~~Infrastructure~~& Cybersecurity (“~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President”) during ERM and ORM risk assessments, and collaboration between the ~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President and relevant Operations employees regarding OT cybersecurity.

Our cybersecurity strategy leverages people, processes, and technology to identify and manage cybersecurity risks, including through: security monitoring; vulnerability assessments; patching and security upgrades; deployment of network defenses; regular cybersecurity trainings for users; use of third-party cybersecurity vendors to complement our internal Cybersecurity and IT Infrastructure team, including for monitoring, remediation, and response capabilities; periodic engagement of cybersecurity consultants, including for cybersecurity maturity assessments and recommendations and penetration test exercises; and periodic reviews of aspects of our cybersecurity program by our Internal Audit function.

We also have a Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan (“CSIRP”) to provide a standardized framework for responding to cybersecurity incidents, including escalation to senior management and other key stakeholders, as appropriate. Our CSIRP is reviewed at least annually, and we conduct cybersecurity tabletop exercises to practice our response.

Our ~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President leads our internal team responsible for assessing and managing cybersecurity risks. The ~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President has more than 10 years of experience being responsible for cybersecurity at multi-site industrial companies, in addition to IT infrastructure and strategy, and has earned the Global Information Assurance Certification (“GIAC”) Critical Controls, Defensible Security Architecture, Security Leadership, Security Operations, and Strategic Planning, Policy and Leadership certifications, as well as a Cybersecurity Management degree from the SANS Technology Institute. The ~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President reports directly to the ~~General~~Senior ~~Counsel~~Vice President, FP&A, Strategy and Performance and regularly engages with and briefs other members of senior and executive management on cybersecurity issues. A number of IT professionals with experience implementing cybersecurity defenses and responding to cyber attacks report to the ~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President and, as noted above, the ~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President also oversees third-party firms specializing in security monitoring and vulnerability assessment.

Our Board, with the assistance of the Audit Committee, to whom the Board has delegated to the primary authority and responsibility to oversee cybersecurity risks, oversees the management of risks arising from cybersecurity incidents, and, as noted above, cybersecurity is one of the material risks tracked through our ERM process. The Audit Committee is briefed quarterly by our ~~Senior~~Vice ~~Director~~President on cybersecurity emerging risks, strategies, key initiatives, incidents and training and compliance. Executive management and other senior leaders participate in the semi-annual updates to our ERM risk register and heat map, and those updates, which incorporate cybersecurity risk and strategy, also are presented to our Board for discussion and feedback at least annually. We also have protocols by which certain cybersecurity incidents that meet established reporting thresholds are escalated within the Company and, where appropriate, reported promptly to the Audit Committee Chair.

Despite our cybersecurity processes and risk mitigation strategies and practices, the threat landscape has become increasingly sophisticated and aggressive. While we have not experienced any material cybersecurity threats or incidents to date, there can be no assurance that a future cybersecurity incident would not have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial condition or results of operations. Additional information on cybersecurity risks we face can be found above under “Item 1A - Risk Factors,” which should be read in conjunction with the foregoing information.

2627

Item 2. Properties

MINING OPERATIONS

The following description of the Company’s mining operations is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Technical Report Summary for each of the operations included as exhibits to this Report and incorporated by reference into this Item 2. Operating statistics for mining operations are presented in the section entitled “Operating Statistics” below.

Mexico - Las Chispas

The Las Chispas operation, operated by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Compania Minera La Llamarada S.A. de C.V., consists of: (1) the Las Chispas processing facility; (2) the Las Chispas underground mine; and (3) other nearby deposits and exploration targets. The Las Chispas operation is located on the western edge of the north-trending Sierra Madre Occidental Mountain Range and is geographically adjacent to the Sonora Valley. The Las Chispas operation is located approximately 354 miles (220 kilometers) northeast of the city of Hermosillo, in the state of Sonora in Northern Mexico at approximately 30.233902°N latitude and 110.163396°W longitude (580,500E, 3,344,500N), within the Arizpe Mining district. All coordinates are in Universal Transverse Mercator (WGS 84), Zone 12. Access to the property is provided by highway leading from the city of Hermosillo in Sonora, Mexico, and 217 miles (350 kilometers) southwest of Tucson, Arizona.


Stage:			Production
Location:			State of Sonora, Northern Mexico
Mine Type:			Underground
Metals/Mineralization:			Silver and Gold, classified as epithermal deposits and are hosted in multiple veins, breccias, and fractures
Product:			Doré
Ownership:			100%
Land Position:			3,425 net acres (1,386 hectares)


Mineral Tenure:			27 wholly-owned mining concessions
Key Permit Conditions:			Authorizations are in place that regulate typical life of mine functions, including mineral processing production facilities and utilities, mining operations, tailings and waste rock storage, exploration, surface disturbance, land use, vegetation and change in soil use, air emissions, water use, waste generation, and reclamation. Major authorizations were obtained through the completion of several MIAs (Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental), permits associated with forestry vegetation disturbance of change in soil use (Cambio de Uso de Suelo en Terrenos Forestales), the required authorizations from the National Water Commission (Comisión Nacional del Agua or CONAGUA) for water resource uses, and special handling waste through the Comisión de Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable del Estado de Sonora (CEDES). Operational standards and best management practices (BMPs) have been established to maintain compliance with applicable regulatory standards and permits. Monitoring programs are established and there is a conceptual reclamation and closure plan prepared in alignment with relevant standards (e.g., Normas Oficiales Mexicanas, NOMs) that reflects current mining, mitigation, and site facilities.
Other:			Compania Minera La Llamarada is obligated to pay a 2% royalty on the Nuevo Lupena and Panuco II concessions for material that has processed grades > 0.5 oz/tonnes gold and > 40 oz/tonnes silver, combined.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Las Chispas reported 296,000 and 357,000 ounces of gold reserves, respectively, and 28.3 million and 33.5 million ounces of silver reserves, respectively. The year-over-year decreases of approximately 17% in gold reserves and approximately 16% in silver reserves were the result of resource additions exceeded by depletion.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Las Chispas reported 67,000 and 156,000 ounces of measured and indicated gold resources, respectively, and 6.4 million and 14.4 million ounces of measured and indicated silver resources, respectively. The year-over-year decreases of approximately 57% in gold measured and indicated resources and 56% in silver measured and indicated resources were each primarily driven by technical revisions.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Las Chispas reported 135,000 and 144,000 ounces of inferred gold ounces, respectively, and 11.8 million and 10.1 million ounces of silver inferred ounces, respectively. The year-over-year decreases of approximately 6% in gold inferred ounces and year-over-year increase of 16% in silver inferred ounces were primarily due to exploration growth and technical revisions.

Mexico — Palmarejo

The Palmarejo complex, operated by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Coeur Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (“Coeur Mexicana”), consists of: (1) the Palmarejo processing facility; (2) the Guadalupe underground mine; (3) the Independencia underground mine; (4) the La Nación underground mine; and (5) other nearby deposits and exploration targets. The Palmarejo complex is located approximately 260 miles (418 kilometers) southwest of Chihuahua, in the state of Chihuahua in Northern Mexico. The coordinates for the centroid of the project are 108° 21.8203’ W longitude and 27° 21.5547’ N latitude (760,781 mE, 3,028,984 mN). Specifically, the Guadalupe mine is located at 108º 21.899’ W longitude and 27º 20.996’ N latitude (760,672 mE, 3,027,949 mN); Independencia is located at 108º 21.752’ W longitude and 27 º 22.078’ N latitude (760,873 mE, 3,029,953 m N); and La Nación is located at 108º 21.809’ W longitude and 27º 21.591’ N latitude (760,797 mE, 3,029,051 mN). All coordinates are in the Universal Transverse Mercator (WGS 84), Zone 12. Access to the property is provided by air, rail, and all-weather paved and gravel roads from the state capitol of Chihuahua.

Stage:			Production
Location:			State of Chihuahua, Northern Mexico
Mine Type:			Underground
Metals/Mineralization:			Silver and Gold, classified as epithermal deposits and are hosted in multiple veins, breccias, and fractures
Product:			Doré
Ownership:			100%
Land Position:			74,~~119~~195 net acres (30,026 hectares)
Mineral Tenure:			96 wholly-owned mining concessions

2729

Mineral Tenure:			96 wholly-owned mining concessions
Key Permit Conditions:			Authorizations are in place that regulate typical life of mine functions, including production facilities and utilities, mining operations, tailings and waste rock storage, exploration, surface disturbance, land use, vegetation and change in soil use, air emissions, water use, and reclamation. Major authorizations were obtained through the completion of several MIAs (Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental), permits associated with forestry vegetation disturbance of change in soil use (Cambio de Uso de Suelo en Terrenos Forestales), and the required authorizations from the National Water Commission (Comisión Nacional del Agua or CONAGUA) for water use, effluent discharge, and to construct facilities in federal watersheds. Operational standards and best management practices (BMPs) have been established to maintain compliance with applicable regulatory standards and permits.
Key Permit Conditions:			Authorizations are in place that regulate typical life of mine functions, including production facilities and utilities, mining operations, tailings and waste rock storage, exploration, surface disturbance, land use, vegetation and change in soil use, air emissions, water use, and reclamation. A permit to operate back-up generators during grid power interruptions was recently administratively revoked; however, we are appealing the revocation and also applying for a new permit. We have been granted the right to continue operating the back-up generators during the course of the appeal. Major authorizations were obtained through the completion of several MIAs (Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental), permits associated with forestry vegetation disturbance of change in soil use (Cambio de Uso de Suelo en Terrenos Forestales), and the required authorizations from the National Water Commission (Comisión Nacional del Agua or CONAGUA) for water use, effluent discharge, and to construct facilities in federal watersheds. Operational standards and best management practices (BMPs) have been established to maintain compliance with applicable regulatory standards and permits.
Other:			Coeur Mexicana is obligated to sell 50% of Palmarejo gold production (excluding production from certain properties acquired in 2015) to a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada Corporation (“Franco-Nevada”) under a gold stream agreement for the lesser of $800 or spot price per ounce. Coeur Mexicana is subject to other royalty agreements for which there are no mineral resources or mineral reserves associated with them in the current life-of-mine plan.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Palmarejo reported 928,000 and 681,000 ounces of gold reserves, respectively, and 64.3 million and 46.0 million ounces of silver reserves, respectively. The year-over-year increases of approximately 36% in gold reserves and approximately 40% in silver reserves were both primarily due to increased metal prices, decreased operating costs, successful conversion drilling, and technical revisions.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Palmarejo reported 1,028,000 and 1,423,000 ounces of measured and indicated gold resources, respectively, and 56.5 million and 89.9 million ounces of measured and indicated silver resources, respectively. The year-over-year decreases of approximately 28% in gold measured and indicated resources and 37% in silver measured and indicated resources were each driven by resource conversion to reserves and technical revisions.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Palmarejo reported 1,265,000 and 643,000 ounces of inferred gold ounces, respectively, and 60.3 million and 34.7 million ounces of silver inferred ounces, respectively. The year-over-year increases of approximately 97% in gold inferred ounces and 74% in silver inferred ounces were primarily due to success from the Company’s exploration investments.

USA (Nevada) — Rochester

The Rochester mine and associated heap leach facilities, operated by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Coeur Rochester, Inc. (“Coeur Rochester”), is an open pit silver and gold mine located in Pershing County, Nevada, approximately 13 miles (21 kilometers) northeast of the city of Lovelock. The mine consists of the main Rochester deposit and the adjacent Nevada Packard deposit, southwest of the Rochester mine. The centroid location for the Rochester site is 400600 E, 4460300 N and the centroid of Rochester pit is located at 4002045 E, 4460050 N and Nevada Packard open pit is located at 400600 E, 4456675 E. All coordinates are in Universal Transverse Mercator (WGS 84), Zone 11T. In November 2018, Coeur Rochester acquired the Lincoln Hill, Gold Ridge and Wilco projects adjacent to Rochester from Alio Gold. The Rochester mine is fully supported with electricity, supplied by a local power company. Ore is mined using conventional open pit methods, with gold and silver recovered by heap leaching of crushed open-pit ore placed on pads located within the Rochester mining area.

Rochester completed the ramp-up and expansion of the operation in 2024. This project included the construction of a new leach pad, a three-stage crushing facility, a Merrill-Crowe process plant, and related infrastructure to support the extension of Rochester’s mine life.

Stage:			Production
Location:			Near Lovelock, Nevada (West-Central Nevada, USA)
Mine Type:			Open Pit Heap Leach
Metals/Mineralization:			Silver and Gold; mineralization is hosted in folded and faulted volcanic rocks of the Rochester Formation and overlying Weaver Formation. Silver and gold, consisting of silver sulfosalt minerals, argentite, silver-bearing tetrahedrite and minor native gold, are contained in zones of multiple quartz veins and veinlets (vein, vein swarms and stockworks) with variable amounts of pyrite
Product:			Doré
Ownership:			100%
Land Position & Mineral Tenure			Coeur Rochester lands, including the Lincoln Hill and related assets, consist of approximately 46,272 net acres•1,465 owned and 358 leased Federal unpatented lode claims and 6 owned federal unpatented placer claims, appropriating approximately 29,982 net acres of public land;•23 patented lode claims, consisting of approximately 392 acres;•Interests owned in approximately 9,327.8 gross acres of additional real property; and•Certain rights in and to approximately 6,182 acres, held either through lease, letter agreement or license.

2830

Land Position & Mineral Tenure			Coeur Rochester lands, including the Lincoln Hill and related assets, consist of approximately 46,721 net acres (18,907 hectares)•1,481 owned and 358 leased Federal unpatented lode claims and 6 owned federal unpatented placer claims, appropriating approximately 30,222 net acres (12,230 hectares) of public land;•23 patented lode claims, consisting of approximately 392 acres (159 hectares);•Interests owned in approximately 9,328 gross acres (3,775 hectares) of additional real property; and•Certain rights in and to approximately 6,182 acres (2,502 hectares), held either through lease, letter agreement or license.
Key Permit Conditions:			The Rochester Mine has in place and operates subject to all necessary environmental permits and licenses from the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies for typical life of mine functions involving exploration, the open pit mines, heap leach pads, processing infrastructure, and all necessary support facilities. Operational standards and best management practices have been established to maintain compliance with applicable regulatory standards and permits. Major permits or approvals are in place from the U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management, Nevada Division of Water Resources, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, as well through other federal, state, and local entities. The environmental effects of the operation were comprehensively evaluated through the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) through Environmental Impact Statements. Monitoring programs are in place, and there is an approved reclamation and closure plan that reflects current mining, mitigation, and site facilities.
Other:			•A security interest in the Rochester mine has been granted in favor of the lenders under the RCF (as defined below) •Coeur Rochester is obligated to pay a net smelters return of up to 5% to ASARCO, the prior owner, when the average quarterly market price of silver equals or exceeds $3031.8868 per ounce indexed for inflation, with the condition that the Rochester mine achieves positive cash flow for the applicable year. If cash flow is negative in any calendar year, the maximum royalty payable is $250,000. •Coeur Rochester is party to other royalty agreements for which there are no mineral resources or mineral reserves associated with them in the current life-of-mine plan.•In 2025, the Rochester mine incurred $11.7 million of royalty expense versus nil in 2024.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Rochester reported 1,332,000 and 1,298,000 ounces of gold reserves, respectively, and 181.8 million and 191.0 million silver reserves, respectively. The year-over-year increase of approximately 3% in gold reserves and decrease of approximately 5% in silver reserves were the result of exploration additions and metal price increases which partly offset losses due to operating costs increases.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Rochester reported 353,000 and 260,000 ounces of measured and indicated gold resources, respectively, and 51.5 million and 36.9 million ounces of measured and indicated silver resources, respectively. The year-over-year increases of approximately 36% in gold measured and indicated resources and approximately 39% in silver measured and indicated resources were driven by exploration additions and technical revisions.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Rochester reported 323,000 and 258,000 ounces of inferred gold resources, respectively, and 54.9 million and 41.8 million ounces of silver inferred ounces, respectively. The year-over-year increases of approximately 25% in gold inferred ounces and 31% in silver inferred ounces were driven by exploration additions and technical revisions.

USA (Alaska) — Kensington

The Kensington underground gold mine and associated milling facilities, operated by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Coeur Alaska, Inc. (“Coeur Alaska”), are located on the east side of the Lynn Canal about 45 miles (72 kilometers) north-northwest of Juneau, Alaska. The mine consists of the (i) Kensington Main deposit, (ii) Elmira, and (iii) other nearby deposits and exploration targets. The mine is accessed by a horizontal tunnel and utilizes conventional and mechanized underground mining methods. Coordinates for the project centroid are 0494796 E, 652068 N and the Kensington Portal is located at 0494796 E, 6530584 N. All coordinates are in Universal Transverse Mercator (NAD 1983), Zone 8V.

Kensington has completed the planned expansion under POA 1, which increased tailings and waste rock storage capacity to support an expected longer mine life, reflecting positive exploration results, improved metal prices and ongoing operational efficiencies.

Stage:			Production
Location:			Juneau, Alaska (Southeast Alaska, USA)
Mine Type:			Underground
Metals/Mineralization:			Gold; gold-bearing mesothermal, quartz, carbonate and pyrite vein swarms and discrete quartz-pyrite veins hosted in Cretaceous-aged Jualin diorite. Most of the gold is contained in calaverite (AuTe2) that occurs in association with native gold as inclusions in and interstitial to pyrite grains and in microfractures in pyrite.
Product:			Gold Concentrate
Ownership:			100%

Land Position & Mineral Tenure			•The Kensington Group, totaling approximately 3,972 net acres, consists of 51 patented lode and patented mill site claims comprising approximately 766 net acres, 298 Federal unpatented lode claims covering approximately 3,222 net acres, and 13 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 95 net acres.•The Jualin Group, totaling approximately 8,531 net acres, is comprised of 23 patented lode and patented mill site claims covering approximately 388 net acres, 452 Federal unpatented lode claims and 75 Federal unpatented mill site claims appropriating approximately 7,979 net acres, a State of Alaska upland mining lease comprising approximately 682 acres, one State of Alaska mining claim comprising approximately three acres and four State-selected mining claims covering approximately 60 acres.•14 of the 23 patented lode claims cover private surface estate only. The mineral estate to these 14 patented lode claims is owned by the State of Alaska, the mineral rights to which are secured by a State of Alaska upland mining lease.•The Company controls properties comprising the Jualin Group, under a lease agreement with Hyak Mining Company (“Hyak”), which is valid until August 5, 2035 and thereafter, provided mining and production are actively occurring within and from the leased premises.
Key Permit Conditions:			The Kensington Mine has in place and operates subject to all necessary environmental permits and licenses from the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies for typical life of mine functions involving mine operations and production/processing facilities and infrastructure, tailings and waste rock storage, exploration, surface disturbance, air emissions, water use, marine transport, and reclamation. Operational standards and best management practices have been established to maintain compliance with applicable regulatory standards and permits. Major permits or approvals are in place from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Forest Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, State of Alaska, as well through other federal, state, and local entities. The environmental effects of the operation were comprehensively evaluated through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) through Environmental Impact Statements. Monitoring programs are in place, and there is an approved reclamation and closure plan that reflects current mining, mitigation, and site facilities.
Other:			•A security interest in the Kensington mine has been granted in favor of the lenders under the RCF.•Coeur Alaska is obligated to pay a subsidiary of Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. (“Triple Flag”) a net returns royalty on up to two million troy ounces of gold produced from the current boundaries of the Kensington mine at a rate of: (i) 1.25% for production occurring from January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2026 and (ii) 1.5% for production occurring on or after January 1, 2027.•Coeur Alaska is obligated to pay Hyak annually, during the initial term of the mining lease, an advance minimum royalty of $231,000, which amount is adjusted every three years in accordance with changes in the Consumer Price Index as published by the U.S. Department of Commerce for all Urban Consumers, City of Anchorage, Alaska. If production occurs from the leased Hyak premises, a 5% net returns royalty on production as defined by the lease, is due, unless the amount of the net returns royalty is less than the adjusted advance minimum royalty.

USA (South Dakota) — Wharf

The Wharf mine, operated by our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Wharf Resources (U.S.A.) Inc. (“Wharf”) and Golden Reward Mining Limited Partnership (“Golden Reward”), is located in the northern Black Hills of western South Dakota, approximately four miles southwest of the city of Lead, South Dakota. Coordinates for the project centroid are 44°20’03”N Latitude, 103°50’06”W Longitude and the Wharf Mine coordinates are 44°20’39”N Latitude, 103°51’02”W Longitude. All coordinates are in Universal Transverse Mercator (WGS 84). Access is established by paved road with power supplied by a local power company.

Stage:			Production
Location:			Lead, South Dakota, USA
Mine Type:			Open Pit Heap Leach
Metals/Mineralization:			Gold and Silver by-product; a structurally controlled disseminated gold deposit
Product:			Electrolytic Cathodic Sludge
Ownership:			100%

Land Position & Mineral Tenure			•The Wharf Group is comprised of 362 patented lode claims, 35 government lots, 123 subdivided lots, and 59 federal unpatented lode claims. These interests cover approximately 3,585 net surface acres, 652 net mineral acres where both the Precambrian and younger formations are owned or controlled, 3,243 net mineral acres of non-Precambrian mineral estate, 1,603 net mineral acres of Precambrian mineral estate and 287 net acres of federal unpatented lode claims.•The Golden Reward Group encompasses 218 patented lode claims, 14 government lots, 19 subdivided lots and 34 federal unpatented lode claims. The Golden Reward Group is comprised of approximately 1,564 net acres of surface estate, 2,988 net mineral acres of mineral estate where both the Precambrian and younger formations are owned or controlled, 357 net mineral acres of Non-Precambrian mineral estate, 153 net mineral acres of Precambrian mineral estate and 25 net acres of federal unpatented lode claims.
Key Permit Conditions:			The Wharf Mine has in place and operates subject to all necessary environmental permits and licenses from the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies for typical life of mine functions involving exploration, the open pit mines, heap leach pads, processing infrastructure, and all necessary support facilities. Operational standards and best management practices have been established to maintain compliance with applicable state and federal regulatory standards and permits. Major permits or approvals are in place from the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lawrence County, as well through other federal, state, and local entities. Monitoring programs are in place, and there is an approved reclamation and closure plan that reflects current mining, mitigation, and site facilities.
Other:			•A security interest in the Wharf mine has been granted in favor of the lenders under the RCF.•Wharf is obligated to pay a royalty related to a mineral lease on 34 patented lode claims. During the term of the mineral lease, the lessors were also entitled to a royalty on production, if any, of 3% of the net smelter returns of all silver and gold ores, together with other ores and minerals. In addition, there is an advance minimum royalty due the lessors of $5,000 per year unless and until Wharf Resources identifies and publishes a reserve encompassing the leased premises, at which point the advance minimum royalty increases to $25,000 per year. •Wharf is obligated to pay a sliding scale production royalty of 0%-2% on the gross value of all gold in saleable form to Royal Gold, Inc. This royalty encumbers most of the lands comprising the Wharf, together with a small portion of the lands encompassing the Golden Reward, and wholly excludes the Precambrian Mineral Estate. Wharf is obligated to pay a 3% non-participating royalty on gold that is produced from ores mined and delivered to heap leach pads or recovered from tailings. This royalty encumbers the mineral estate, including the Precambrian Mineral Estate, of much of the lands held by Wharf. •Wharf is party to other royalty agreements for which there are no mineral resources or mineral reserves associated with them in the current life-of-mine plan.

Mexico - Las Chispas

The Las Chispas operation, operated by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Compania Minera La Llamarada S.A. de C.V., consists of: (1) the Las Chispas processing facility; (2) the Las Chispas underground mine; and (3) other nearby deposits and exploration targets. The Las Chispas operation is located on the western edge of the north-trending Sierra Madre Occidental Mountain Range and is geographically adjacent to the Sonora Valley. The Las Chispas operation is located approximately 220 km miles northeast of the city of Hermosillo, in the state of Sonora in Northern Mexico at approximately 30.233902°N latitude and 110.163396°W longitude (580,500E, 3,344,500N), within the Arizpe Mining district. All coordinates are in Universal Transverse Mercator (WGS 84), Zone 12. Access to the property is provided by highway leading from the city of Hermosillo in Sonora, Mexico, and 350 km southwest of Tucson, Arizona.

Stage:			Production
Location:			State of Sonora, Northern Mexico
Mine Type:			Underground
Metals/Mineralization:			Silver and Gold, classified as epithermal deposits and are hosted in multiple veins, breccias, and fractures
Product:			Doré
Ownership:			100%
Land Position:			3,425 net acres

Mineral Tenure:			27 wholly-owned mining concessions
Stage:			Production
Key Permit Conditions:			Authorizations are in place that regulate typical life of mine functions, including mineral processing production facilities and utilities, mining operations, tailings and waste rock storage, exploration, surface disturbance, land use, vegetation and change in soil use, air emissions, water use, waste generation, and reclamation. Major authorizations were obtained through the completion of several MIAs (Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental), permits associated with forestry vegetation disturbance of change in soil use (Cambio de Uso de Suelo en Terrenos Forestales), the required authorizations from the National Water Commission (Comisión Nacional del Agua or CONAGUA) for water resource uses, and special handling waste through the Comisión de Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable del Estado de Sonora (CEDES). Operational standards and best management practices (BMPs) have been established to maintain compliance with applicable regulatory standards and permits. Monitoring programs are established and there is a conceptual reclamation and closure plan prepared in alignment with relevant standards (e.g., Normas Oficiales Mexicanas, NOMs) that reflects current mining, mitigation, and site facilities.
Location:			Juneau, Alaska (Southeast Alaska, USA)
Other:			Compania Minera La Llamarada is obligated to pay a 2% royalty on the Nuevo Lupena and Panuco II concessions for material that has processed grades > 0.5 oz/tonnes gold and > 40 oz/tonnes silver, combined.
Mine Type:			Underground
Metals/Mineralization:			Gold; gold-bearing mesothermal, quartz, carbonate and pyrite vein swarms and discrete quartz-pyrite veins hosted in Cretaceous-aged Jualin diorite. Most of the gold is contained in calaverite (AuTe2) that occurs in association with native gold as inclusions in and interstitial to pyrite grains and in microfractures in pyrite.
Product:			Gold Concentrate
Ownership:			100%
Land Position & Mineral Tenure			•The Kensington Group, totaling approximately 3,972 net acres (1,607 hectares), consists of 51 patented lode and patented mill site claims comprising approximately 766 net acres (310 hectares), 298 Federal unpatented lode claims covering approximately 3,222 net acres (1,304 hectares), and 13 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 95 net acres (38 hectares).•The Jualin Group, totaling approximately 8,531 net acres (3,452 hectares), is comprised of 23 patented lode and patented mill site claims covering approximately 388 net acres (157 hectares), 452 Federal unpatented lode claims and 75 Federal unpatented mill site claims appropriating approximately 7,979 net acres (3,229 hectares), a State of Alaska upland mining lease comprising approximately 682 acres (276 hectares), one State of Alaska mining claim comprising approximately 3 acres (1 hectare) and four State-selected mining claims covering approximately 60 acres (24 hectares).•14 of the 23 patented lode claims cover private surface estate only. The mineral estate to these 14 patented lode claims is owned by the State of Alaska, the mineral rights to which are secured by a State of Alaska upland mining lease. •The Company controls properties comprising the Jualin Group, under a lease agreement with Hyak Mining Company (“Hyak”), which is valid until August 5, 2035 and thereafter, provided mining and production are actively occurring within and from the leased premises.
Key Permit Conditions:			The Kensington Mine has in place and operates subject to all necessary environmental permits and licenses from the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies for typical life of mine functions involving mine operations and production/processing facilities and infrastructure, tailings and waste rock storage, exploration, surface disturbance, air emissions, water use, marine transport, and reclamation. Operational standards and best management practices have been established to maintain compliance with applicable regulatory standards and permits. Major permits or approvals are in place from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Forest Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, State of Alaska, as well through other federal, state, and local entities. The environmental effects of the operation were comprehensively evaluated through the NEPA through Environmental Impact Statements. Monitoring programs are in place, and there is an approved reclamation and closure plan that reflects current mining, mitigation, and site facilities.
Other:			•A security interest in the Kensington mine has been granted in favor of the lenders under the RCF. •Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Royalty Deed effective January 1, 2024, Coeur is obligated to pay Maverix a net returns royalty of 1.25% through December 31, 2026, and 1.50% thereafter, until payment is made on two million troy ounces of refined gold or equivalent, based on the monthly average gold price of the London Bullion Market Association. •Coeur Alaska is obligated to pay Hyak Mining Company (“Hyak”) annually, during the initial term of the mining lease, an advance minimum royalty of $231,000, which amount is adjusted every three years in accordance with changes in the Consumer Price Index as published by the U.S. Department of Commerce for all Urban Consumers, City of Anchorage, Alaska. If production occurs from the leased Hyak premises, a 5% net returns royalty on production as defined by the lease, is due, unless the amount of the net returns royalty is less than the adjusted advance minimum royalty.•In 2025, the Kensington mine incurred $4.9 million of royalty expense compared to $3.2 million in 2024.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Kensington reported 546,000 and 501,000 ounces of gold reserves, respectively.

The year-over-year increase of approximately 9% was primarily due to additions through successful resource conversion drilling.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Kensington reported 433,000 and 886,000 ounces of measured and indicated gold resources, respectively, and 96,000 and 228,000 ounces of inferred gold resources, respectively. The year-over-year decreases of approximately 51% in measured and indicated gold resources and approximately a 58% decrease in inferred resources were primarily due to technical revisions.

USA (South Dakota) — Wharf

The Wharf mine, operated by our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Wharf Resources (U.S.A.) Inc. (“Wharf”) and Golden Reward Mining Limited Partnership (“Golden Reward”), is located in the northern Black Hills of western South Dakota, approximately four miles (six kilometers) southwest of the city of Lead, South Dakota. Coordinates for the project centroid are 44°20’03”N Latitude, 103°50’06”W Longitude and the Wharf Mine coordinates are 44°20’39”N Latitude, 103°51’02”W Longitude. All coordinates are in Universal Transverse Mercator (WGS 84). Access is established by paved road with power supplied by a local power company.


Stage:			Production
Location:			Lead, South Dakota, USA
Mine Type:			Open Pit Heap Leach
Metals/Mineralization:			Gold and Silver by-product; a structurally controlled disseminated gold deposit
Product:			Electrolytic Cathodic Sludge
Ownership:			100%
Land Position & Mineral Tenure			•The Wharf Group comprises of 362 patented lode claims, 35 government lots, 123 subdivided lots, and 59 federal unpatented lode claims. These interests cover approximately 3,585 net surface acres (1,451 hectares), 652 net mineral acres (264 hectares) where both the Precambrian and younger formations are owned or controlled, 3,243 net mineral acres (1,312 hectares) of non-Precambrian mineral estate, 1,603 net mineral acres (649 hectares) of Precambrian mineral estate and 287 net acres (116 hectares) of federal unpatented lode claims. •The Golden Reward Group encompasses 218 patented lode claims, 14 government lots, 19 subdivided lots and 34 federal unpatented lode claims. The Golden Reward Group is comprised of approximately 1,564 net acres (633 hectares) of surface estate, 2,988 net mineral acres (1,209 hectares) of mineral estate where both the Precambrian and younger formations are owned or controlled, 357 net mineral acres (144 hectares) of Non-Precambrian mineral estate, 153 net mineral acres (62 hectares) of Precambrian mineral estate and 25 net acres (10 hectares) of federal unpatented lode claims.


Key Permit Conditions:			The Wharf Mine has in place and operates subject to all necessary environmental permits and licenses from the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies for typical life of mine functions involving exploration, the open pit mines, heap leach pads, processing infrastructure, and all necessary support facilities. Operational standards and best management practices have been established to maintain compliance with applicable state and federal regulatory standards and permits. Major permits or approvals are in place from the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lawrence County, as well through other federal, state, and local entities. Monitoring programs are in place, and there is an approved reclamation and closure plan that reflects current mining, mitigation, and site facilities.
Other:			•A security interest in the Wharf mine has been granted in favor of the lenders under the RCF. •Wharf is obligated to pay a royalty related to a mineral lease on 34 patented lode claims. During the term of the mineral lease, the lessors were also entitled to a royalty on production, if any, of 3% of the net smelter returns of all silver and gold ores, together with other ores and minerals. In addition, there is an advance minimum royalty due to the lessors of $5,000 per year unless and until Wharf Resources identifies and publishes a reserve encompassing the leased premises, at which point the advance minimum royalty increases to $25,000 per year. •Wharf is obligated to pay a sliding scale production royalty of 0%-2% on the gross value of all gold in saleable form to Royal Gold, Inc. This royalty encumbers most of the lands comprising the Wharf, together with a small portion of the lands encompassing the Golden Reward, and wholly excludes the Precambrian Mineral Estate. Wharf is obligated to pay a 3% non-participating royalty on gold that is produced from ores mined and delivered to heap leach pads or recovered from tailings. This royalty encumbers the mineral estate, including the Precambrian Mineral Estate, of much of the lands held by Wharf. •Wharf is party to other royalty agreements for which there are no mineral resources or mineral reserves associated with them in the current life-of-mine plan. •In 2025, the Wharf mine incurred $14.7 million of royalty expense compared to $10.2 million in 2024.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Wharf reported 1,250,000 and 757,000 ounces of gold reserves, respectively. The year-over-year increase of approximately 65% was primarily due to successful conversion drilling and technical revisions.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Wharf reported 1,185,000 and 1,019,000 ounces of measured and indicated gold resources, respectively, and 1,487,000 and 470,000 ounces of inferred gold resources, respectively. The year-over-year increases of approximately 16% in measured and indicated gold resources and 216% of inferred gold resources were each primarily driven by successful exploration investments and technical revisions.

EXPLORATION PROJECTS

Canada (British Columbia) — Silvertip

The Silvertip silver-zinc-lead exploration property owned by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Coeur Silvertip Ltd. (“Coeur Silvertip”), is an underground project located in northern British Columbia, Canada just south of the Yukon border. The project centroid coordinates in UTM (NAD 27) are 6,643,900 N and 425,200 E. The project is accessible via a 40-mile (25-kilometer) mine access road off the Alaska Highway.

Stage:			Exploration
Location:			Northern British Columbia, Canada, (10 miles (16 kilometers) south of the Yukon Territory ~~Border)~~border
Mine Type:			Underground
Metals/Mineralization:			Silver, Zinc and Lead; carbonate-hosted massive sulfide deposit
Product:			Concentrate
Ownership:			100%
Land Position & Mineral Tenure:			•Seventy-Three (73) contiguous mineral claims containing approximately 48,998 hectares (121,076 acres), three mining leases containing approximately 1,828 hectares (4,517 acres), and approximately 681 hectares (1,683 acres) under an option agreement entered into November 2024. In total, the Silvertip mine covers an area of approximately 51,507 hectares (127,276 acres)
Other:			•Suspended operating activities in February 2020; ongoing exploration and technical work to evaluate and support a potential future operation•Silvertip is obligated to pay a 2.5% net smelter return royalty payable to Triple Flag on all mineral products produced from the Silvertip property, payable quarterly.•Silvertip is party to an agreement with the Kaska Nation which, among other things, provides for annual payments to the Kaska Nation calculated based on the financial performance of the Silvertip property and the average price of silver for the relevant calendar year.


Land Position & Mineral Tenure:			•One Hundred-Three (103) contiguous mineral claims containing approximately 305,338 acres (123,566 hectares) and three (3) mining leases containing approximately 4,520 acres (1,829 hectares). In total, the Silvertip mine covers an area of approximately 309,858 acres (125,395 hectares)
Other:			•Suspended operating activities in February 2020; ongoing exploration and technical work to evaluate and support a potential future operation •Silvertip is obligated to pay a 2.5% net smelter return royalty payable to Triple Flag on all mineral products produced from the Silvertip property, payable quarterly. •Silvertip is party to an agreement with the Kaska Nation which, among other things, provides for annual payments to the Kaska Nation calculated based on the financial performance of the Silvertip property and the average price of silver for the relevant calendar year.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Silvertip reported 57.6 million and 57.7 million ounces of measured and indicated silver resources, respectively, and 685.5 million and 768.7 million pounds of measured and indicated lead resources, respectively, and 1,234.2 million and 1,516.8 million pounds of measured and indicated zinc resources, respectively. The year-over-year decrease of approximately 1% in silver measured and indicated resources, a decrease of approximately 11% in lead measured and indicated resources, and a decrease of approximately 19% in zinc measured and indicated resources were each due to technical revisions.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Silvertip reported 11.4 million and 16.1 million ounces of inferred silver resources, respectively, and 134.7 million and 199.8 million pounds of inferred lead resources, respectively, and 272.6 million and 481.8 million pounds of inferred zinc resources, respectively. The year-over-year decrease of approximately 29% in silver inferred resources, a decrease of approximately 33% in lead inferred resources, and a decrease of approximately 43% in zinc inferred resources were each due to technical revisions.

OTHER PROPERTIES

The Company has leased or owned real property for office space.

OPERATING STATISTICS

	Palmarejo			Rochester
	2024	2023	2022		2024	2023	2022
Gold produced (oz.)	108,666	100,605	106,782		39,203	38,775	34,735
Silver produced (oz.)	6,779,659	6,591,590	6,708,689		4,377,847	3,391,530	3,061,924

Operating Statistics, Proven and Probable Reserves and Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources presented below contain tabular information that is presented in both metric and imperial as follows: (i) metric tonnage is utilized for all metals; (ii) gold and silver grades are presented in grams per tonne; (iii) lead and zinc are presented in percentages; and (iv) metal content for gold and silver is presented in ounces while metal content for lead and zinc is presented in pounds. The information that is presented in metric for the periods ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 has been converted from the 2024 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 19, 2025, as this information was previously presented in imperial units.


	Las Chispas			Palmarejo
	2025	2024	2023		2025	2024	2023





Gold produced (oz.)	54,705	—	—		100,768	108,666	100,605
Silver produced (oz.)	5,145,771	—	—		6,501,308	6,779,659	6,591,590

	Kensington			Wharf
	Rochester			Kensington
	2024	2023	2022		2024	2023	2022
	2025	2024	2023		2025	2024	2023
Gold produced (oz.)	9560,~~671~~178	8439,~~789~~203	~~109~~38,~~061~~775		98106,~~042~~068	9395,~~502~~671	7984,~~768~~789
Silver produced (oz.)	6,131,881	4,377,847	3,391,530		—	—	—


	Wharf
	2025	2024	2023



Gold produced (oz.)	97,327	98,042	93,502
Silver produced (oz.)	135,722	232,013	267,786

MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES

Internal Controls

The Company’s internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information and processes utilized in assessing its exploration results as well as mineral resource and reserve estimation are reasonable and in line with industry best practices. These internal controls include quality assurance and quality control (“QA/QC”) programs in the collection, ~~analysis, verification, storage, reporting and use of drillhole, assay, metallurgical and other technical and scientific information, including the following:~~

analysis, verification, storage, reporting and use of drillhole, assay, metallurgical and other technical and scientific information, including the following:

•Third-party fully certified labs are used for assays used in public disclosure or resource models;

•Drill programs include insertion of blank, duplicate, and certified reference materials;

•QA/QC program with sufficient results for the analytical programs;

•All core and reverse-circulation samples have been cataloged and stored in secure and designated areas on company property;

•Data is subject to validation, which includes checks on downhole surveys, collar coordinates, geological data, and assay data;

•Prior to use in mineral resource or mineral reserve estimation, the selected data to support estimation are downloaded from the database into a project file and reviewed for improbable entries and high values;

•Written procedures and guidelines are used to support estimation methods and approaches;

•Completion of annual technical statements on each mineral resource and mineral reserve estimate by qualified persons. These technical statements include evaluation of modifying and technical factors, incorporate available reconciliation data, and are based on a cashflow analysis; and

•Internal reviews of block models, mineral resources and mineral reserves using a “layered responsibility” approach with Qualified Person involvement at the site and corporate levels.

Internal controls are discussed where required in the relevant chapters of the technical report summary. The following sub-sections summarize the types of procedures, protocols, guidance and controls that Coeur has in place for its exploration and mineral resource and reserve estimation efforts, and the type of risk assessments that are undertaken.

Exploration and Drilling

Coeur has the following internal controls protocols in place for exploration data:

•Written procedures and guidelines to support preferred sampling methods and approaches, with periodic compliance reviews of adherence to such written procedures and guidelines;

•Maintenance of a complete chain-of-custody, ensuring the traceability and integrity of the samples at all handling stages from collection, transportation, sample preparation and analysis to long-term sample storage;

•Geological logs are checked and verified, and there is a physical sign-off to attest to the validation protocol required;

•Quality control checks on collar and downhole survey data for errors or significant deviations;

•Third-party fully certified labs are used for assays used in public disclosure or resource models;

•Appropriate types of quality control samples are inserted into the sample stream at appropriate frequencies to assess analytical data quality;

•Regular inspection of analytical and sample preparation facilities by appropriately experienced Coeur personnel;

•QA/QC data are regularly verified to ensure that outliers, sample mix-ups, contamination, or laboratory biases during the sample preparation and analysis steps are correctly identified, mitigated or remediated. Changes to database entries are required to be documented; and

•Database upload and verification procedures to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the data being entered into the project database(s). These are typically performed using software data-checking routines. Changes to database entries are required to be documented. Data is subject to regular backups.

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates

Coeur has the following internal controls protocols in place for mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation:

•Written procedures and guidelines are used to support estimation methods and approaches;

•Internal reviews of block models, mineral resources and mineral reserves using a “layered responsibility” approach with qualified person involvement at the site and corporate levels.

Development of our mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates use tools and processes such as mine design, scheduling and geostatistical tools that conform to industry best practices and are regularly reviewed and reconciled by internal and external parties. There are internal and external audit processes for mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation.

Mineral resources and mineral reserves are estimates that contain inherent risk and depend upon geologic interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which may prove to be unreliable. See “Item 1A - Risk Factors” for additional information.

		Summary Gold Mineral Reserves at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(9)
		Proven Mineral Reserves			Probable Mineral Reserves			Total Mineral Reserves
	CoeurOwnership	Tons (000s)	Grade (oz./ton)	Ounces(000s)	Tons (000s)	Grade (oz./ton)	Ounces(000s)	Tons (000s)	Grade (oz./ton)	Ounces(000s)
Mexico
Palmarejo(4)	100%	3,473	0.059	205	8,373	0.057	475	11,845	0.057	681
Las Chispas(8)	100%	787	0.150	118	2,700	0.088	239	3,486	0.102	357
United States
Rochester(5)	100%	468,432	0.002	1,116	59,123	0.003	182	527,555	0.002	1,298
Kensington(6)	100%	1,340	0.186	249	1,427	0.177	252	2,768	0.181	501
Wharf(7)	100%	6,563	0.030	199	22,993	0.024	558	29,556	0.026	757
Total Gold		480,595	0.004	1,887	94,615	0.018	1,706	575,211	0.006	3,593

Coeur had attributable proven and probable gold reserves of 4.4 million ounces at December 31, 2025. For 2025 and 2024, reserves were estimated at gold price assumptions of $2,200 and $1,800 per ounce, respectively, except for Kensington at $2,200 and $2,000 per ounce, respectively. The increase in the reserves gold price assumption is based on the Company's assessment of multiple factors, including exploration growth, historical pricing trends, consensus price forecasts, and operational cost increases. We estimate that our 2025 reserves would increase by 6% (4.6 million ounces), or decline by 10% (3.9 million ounces), if the gold price assumption increased or decreased $200 per ounce, respectively, with all other assumptions remaining constant.

		Summary Silver Mineral Reserves at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(9)
		Proven Mineral Reserves			Probable Mineral Reserves			Total Mineral Reserves
	CoeurOwnership	Tons (000s)	Grade (oz./ton)	Ounces(000s)	Tons (000s)	Grade (oz./ton)	Ounces(000s)	Tons (000s)	Grade (oz./ton)	Ounces(000s)
Mexico
Palmarejo(4)	100%	3,473	3.94	13,667	8,373	3.86	32,307	11,845	3.88	45,974
Las Chispas(8)	100%	787	16.00	12,586	2,700	7.75	20,931	3,486	9.61	33,516
United States
Rochester(5)	100%	468,432	0.37	172,408	59,123	0.32	18,632	527,555	0.36	191,040
Total Silver		472,691	0.42	198,660	70,195	1.02	71,870	542,887	0.50	270,530

Coeur had attributable proven and probable silver reserves of 274.4 million ounces at December 31, 2025. For 2025 and 2024, reserves were estimated at a silver price assumption of $26.00 and $23.50 per ounce, respectively. The increase in the reserves silver price assumption is based on the Company's assessment of multiple factors, including including exploration growth, historical pricing trends, consensus price forecasts, and operational cost increases. We estimate that our 2025 reserves would increase by 3% (283.1 million ounces), or decline by 8% (251.3 million ounces), if the silver price assumption increased or decreased $2.00 per ounce, respectively, with all other assumptions remaining constant.

MINERAL RESERVES


		Summary Gold Mineral Reserves at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025(1)(2)(3)(9)
		Proven Mineral Reserves			Probable Mineral Reserves			Total Mineral Reserves
	Coeur Ownership	Tonnes (000s)	Grade (grams/tonne)	Ounces (000s)	Tonnes (000s)	Grade (grams/tonne)	Ounces (000s)	Tonnes (000s)	Grade (grams/tonne)	Ounces (000s)
Mexico
Palmarejo(4)	100%	5,183	1.79	295	13,927	1.41	632	19,064	1.51	928
Las Chispas(8)	100%	981	4.19	132	2,240	2.28	164	3,221	2.86	296
United States
Rochester(5)	100%	402,556	0.09	1,162	45,100	0.12	171	447,656	0.09	1,332
Kensington(6)	100%	1,539	5.92	293	1,297	6.07	253	2,836	5.99	546
Wharf(7)	100%	20,334	0.73	477	34,727	0.69	773	55,061	0.71	1,250
Total Gold		430,547	0.17	2,360	97,291	0.64	1,993	527,838	0.26	4,353

(1) Certain definitions:The term “reserve” means that part of a mineral deposit that can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The term “proven (measured) reserves” means reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes, grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurements are spaced so closely and the geologic character is sufficiently defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established. The term “probable (indicated) reserves” means reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. The term “cutoff grade” means the lowest grade of mineralized material considered economic to process. Cutoff grades vary between deposits depending upon prevailing economic conditions, mineability of the deposit, by-products, amenability of the mineralized material to silver or gold extraction and type of milling or leaching facilities available.


		Summary Silver Mineral Reserves at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025(1)(2)(3)(9)
		Proven Mineral Reserves			Probable Mineral Reserves			Total Mineral Reserves
	Coeur Ownership	Tonnes (000s)	Grade (grams/tonne)	Ounces (000s)	Tonnes (000s)	Grade (grams/tonne)	Ounces (000s)	Tonnes (000s)	Grade (grams/tonne)	Ounces (000s)
Mexico
Palmarejo(4)	100%	5,138	117.11	19,344	13,927	100.44	44,973	19,064	104.93	64,318
Las Chispas(8)	100%	981	442.91	13,973	2,240	198.50	14,293	3,221	272.96	28,266
United States
Rochester(5)	100%	402,556	12.81	165,799	45,100	11.04	16,014	447,656	12.63	181,814


Total Silver		408,675	15.15	199,117	61,267	38.22	75,280	469,941	18.16	274,397

(2) Assumed metal prices for 2024 Mineral Reserves were $23.50 per ounce of silver, $1,800 per ounce of gold, $1.15 per pound of zinc, $0.95 per pound of lead, except for Kensington at $2,000 per ounce of gold. 37

(31) Certain definitions:The ~~Mineral~~term ~~Reserve~~“reserve” ~~estimates~~means that part of a mineral deposit that can be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. The term “proven (measured) reserves” means reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes, grade and/or quality are ~~current~~computed asfrom the results of ~~December~~detailed 31sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, ~~2024~~sampling and measurements are spaced so closely and the geologic character is sufficiently defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are ~~reported~~well ~~using~~established. The term “probable (indicated) reserves” means reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the ~~definitions~~sites infor ~~Item~~inspection, ~~1300~~sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of ~~Regulation~~assurance, Salthough lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. The term “cut-Koff ~~and~~grade” ~~were~~means ~~prepared~~the lowest grade of mineralized material considered economic to process. Cut-off grades vary between deposits depending upon prevailing economic conditions, mineability of the deposit, by-products, amenability of the ~~Company’s~~mineralized ~~technical~~material ~~staff~~to silver or gold extraction and type of milling or leaching facilities available.

(42) ~~Mineral~~Assumed ~~Reserve~~metal ~~estimates~~prices use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 2.13–2.45 g/t AuEq and an incremental development cut-off grade 1.05 g/t AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 92.0% for ~~gold~~2025 ~~and~~Mineral ~~83.0%~~Reserves ~~for~~were ~~silver; mining dilution assumes 0.3–1.5 meter of hanging/foot wall waste dilution; mining loss of 15% was applied; variable mining costs that range from US~~$5726.~~67–US$74.45/tonne,~~00 ~~surface~~per ~~haulage~~ounce ~~costs~~ of ~~US$4.29/tonne~~silver, ~~process costs of US~~$~~31.06/tonne~~2,200 ~~general~~per ~~and~~ounce ~~administrative costs~~ of ~~US$15.95/tonne~~gold, ~~and surface/auxiliary support costs of US~~$41.~~42/tonne.~~15 ~~Excludes~~per ~~the~~pound ~~impact~~ of ~~the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Reserves. No assurances can be given that all mineral reserves will be mined~~zinc, as mineralized material that may qualify as reserves under applicable standards by virtue of having positive economics may not generate attractive enough returns to be included in our mine plans, due to factors such as the impact of the gold stream at Palmarejo$0.95 Asper apound ~~result, we may elect not to mine portions~~ of ~~the mineralized material reported as reserves~~lead.

(53) The Mineral Reserve estimates are ~~tabulated~~current ~~within~~as aof ~~confining~~December ~~pit~~31, ~~design~~2025, ~~and~~are ~~use~~reported using the ~~following~~definitions ~~input~~in ~~parameters:~~Item ~~Rochester~~1300 ~~oxide~~of ~~variable~~Regulation ~~recovery Au = 77.7–85.9% and Ag = 59.4~~S-~~61.0%;~~K ~~Rochester sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2–77.7%~~ and Agwere =prepared ~~0.0–59.4%;~~by ~~with~~the aCompany’s ~~net~~technical ~~smelter return cutoff of $3~~staff.~~76/ton~~ ~~oxide~~Mineral ~~and~~Reserve ~~US$3.86/ton~~point ~~sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 92.0% and Ag = 61.0%; with a net smelter return cutoff~~ of ~~$4.24/ton~~reference ~~for oxide; Lincoln Hill oxide recovery Au = 63.9% and Ag = 39.5%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $4.53/ton for oxide where the NSR~~ is ~~calculated~~delivered asto resource net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * (gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 48º over the ~~life-of-mine~~process facility.

(64) Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold ~~price~~equivalent ofcut-off $grade that ranges from 1.27–2~~,000~~.19 g/~~oz;~~tonne ~~reported~~AuEq ~~above~~and aan ~~gold~~incremental development cut-off grade of 0.~~133~~78 ozg/~~ton~~tonne AuAuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 9495.24%; for gold ~~payability~~and ~~of 97~~87.51% for silver; mining dilution assumes 0.4–1.0 meter of ~~15-20%~~hanging/foot wall waste dilution; mining loss of 1215% was applied; variable mining costs ofthat range from US$~~116~~32.0929–$43.08/~~ton~~tonne, ~~mined;~~surface ~~process~~haulage costs of US$554.1440/~~ton~~tonne, ~~processed;~~process costs of US$30.02/tonne, general and administrative costs of US$5314.1817/~~ton~~tonne, ~~processed;~~and ~~sustaining~~surface/auxiliary ~~capital~~support costs of US$43.5052/~~ton~~tonne. ~~processed;~~Excludes ~~and~~the ~~concentrate~~impact ~~refining~~of ~~and~~the ~~shipping~~Franco-Nevada ~~costs~~gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of ~~US$97~~Mineral Reserves.~~48/oz~~ ~~sold~~No assurances can be given that all mineral reserves will be mined, as mineralized material that may qualify as reserves under applicable standards by virtue of having positive economics may not generate attractive enough returns to be included in our mine plans, due to factors such as the impact of the gold stream at Palmarejo. As a result, we may elect not to mine portions of the mineralized material reported as reserves.

(75) Mineral Reserve estimates are tabulated within a confining pit design and use the following ~~key~~ input parameters: ~~assumption~~Rochester ofoxide ~~conventional~~variable ~~open~~recovery ~~pit~~Au ~~mining~~= 71.2–85.9% and Ag = 59.4%; ~~reported~~Rochester ~~above~~sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2–77.7% and Ag = 0.0–59.4%; with a ~~gold~~net smelter return cut-off ~~grade~~ of 0$4.~~010~~12/ton ozoxide and US$4.22/ton Ausulfide; ~~average~~Nevada ~~metallurgical~~Packard oxide recovery ~~assumption~~Au of= 7888.04% and Ag = 59.4%; ~~royalty~~with ~~burden~~a net smelter return cut-off of US$~~140~~4.4092/ozton Aufor oxide; ~~pit~~Lincoln ~~slope~~Hill ~~angles~~oxide ~~that~~recovery ~~vary~~Au ~~from~~= ~~34–50º~~61-63.9% and Ag = 18.5-39.5%; ~~mining~~with ~~costs~~a net smelter return cut-off of US$25.5602/ton ~~mined,~~for ~~process~~oxide ~~costs~~where ofthe USNSR is calculated as net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($~~12.02~~/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) ~~processed~~* gold recovery (~~includes~~%) ~~general~~* &(gold ~~administrative~~price ~~and~~($/oz) ~~sustaining~~- ~~capital~~refining ~~costs~~cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 48º over the life-of-mine.

(86) Mineral Reserve estimates ~~uses~~use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; reported above a ~~silver~~gold cut-off grade of ~~250~~0.123 g oz/ton ~~tonne~~Au ~~silver equivalent~~ and an incremental development cut-off grade of 630.04 g oz/ton ~~tonne AgEq~~Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 9794.5%; ~~for~~gold ~~silver~~payability ~~and~~of 9897.05%; ~~for~~ gold; ~~mining~~royalty ~~dilution assumes 5% for development, 1 meter to 1.5 meters~~ of ~~ELOS (0.5 m –~~ 1.~~0 m of hanging wall and 0.25 m – 0.~~5%; mmining ~~of footwall~~ dilution) ~~depending on geotechnical conditions in each stoping location, 0.2 meter ELOS (0.1 m~~ of hanging wall and 0.1 m of footwall dilution) for cut and fill, 0.4 meter ELOS (0.2 m of hanging wall and 0.2 m of footwall dilution), 0.25 m for each exposed backfill floor, and 0.5 m for each exposed backfill wall15-20%; mining loss of 212% ~~for development and 5% for stoping~~ was applied~~, additional losses have been included to account for the required pillars in uphole stopes that cannot be filled~~; ~~variable production~~ mining costs ~~that range from US$58.06–US$239.51/tonne, development mining costs~~ of US$27127.4032/~~tonne,~~ton mined; process costs of US$4551.7248/~~tonne,~~ton ~~site~~processed; general and administrative costs of US$2049.7074/~~tonne,~~ton ~~underground~~processed; ~~general~~sustaining ~~and~~capital ~~administrative costs of~~ US$125.8179/~~tonne,~~ton processed; and ~~sustaining~~concentrate ~~capital~~refining and shipping costs of US$7104.6473/~~tonne~~oz sold.

(97) ~~Rounding~~ Mineral Reserve estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of ~~short~~conventional ~~tons,~~open ~~grades,~~pit ~~and~~mining; ~~troy~~reported ~~ounces,~~above asa ~~required~~NSR bycut-off ~~reporting~~grade ~~guidelines,~~of ~~may~~$13.42/ton ~~result~~; inaverage ~~apparent~~metallurgical ~~differences~~recovery ~~between~~assumption ~~tons,~~of ~~grades~~78.0%; royalty burden of US$112.00/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of US$2.71/ton mined, process costs of US$13.42/ton processed (includes general & administrative and ~~contained~~sustaining ~~metal~~capital ~~contents~~costs).

(8) Mineral Reserve estimates uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; reported above a silver equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grade of 140 g/tonne and an incremental development cut-off grade of 59 g/tonne AgEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 97.5% for silver and 98.0% for gold; mining dilution assumes 5% for development, 1 meter to 1.25 meters of ELOS (0.25 m – 0.5 m of hanging wall and 0.5 m – 1.0 m of footwall dilution) depending on geotechnical conditions in each stoping location, 0.2 meter ELOS (0.1 m of hanging wall and 0.1 m of footwall dilution) for cut and fill, 0.25 m for each exposed backfill floor, and 0.5 m for each exposed backfill wall; mining loss of 2% for development and 5% for stoping was applied; variable production mining costs that range from US$65–US$154/tonne, development mining costs of US$39/tonne, process costs of US$42/tonne, site general and administrative costs of US$25/tonne, underground general and administrative costs of US$18/tonne, and sustaining capital costs of US$12/tonne.

(9) Rounding of tonnes, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tonnes, grades, and contained metal contents.

MINERAL RESOURCES

Summary Gold Mineral Resources at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(11)

Summary Gold Mineral Resources at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025(1)(2)(3)(11)

Measured Mineral Resources

Indicated Mineral Resources

Measured + Indicated Mineral Resources

Inferred Mineral Resources

CoeurOwnership

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (~~oz.~~grams/~~ton~~tonne)

Ounces(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (~~oz.~~grams/~~ton~~tonne)

Ounces(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (~~oz.~~grams/~~ton~~tonne)

Ounces(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (~~oz.~~grams/~~ton~~tonne)

Ounces(000s)

Mexico

Palmarejo Mine, Mexico(4)

100%

64,~~996~~598

01.~~068~~60

~~474~~236

1512,~~368~~197

02.~~062~~02

~~949~~792

2216,~~363~~795

01.~~064~~90

1,~~423~~028

619,~~577~~203

02.~~098~~05

~~643~~1,265

Las Chispas Mine, Mexico(10)

100%

~~116~~282

0.~~305~~76

357

1,~~094~~700

01.~~110~~11

~~120~~61

1,~~211~~983

01.~~129~~06

~~156~~67

12,~~276~~117

01.~~113~~98

~~144~~135

United States

Rochester Mine, USA(7)

100%

82133,~~371~~346

0.~~002~~06

~~144~~253

4034,~~402~~996

0.~~003~~09

~~116~~100

~~122~~168,~~773~~342

0.~~002~~07

~~260~~353

~~116~~138,~~521~~129

0.~~002~~07

~~258~~323

Kensington Mine, USA(5)

100%

21,~~150~~114

07.~~254~~48

~~546~~268

~~1,450~~674

07.~~235~~59

~~340~~164

31,~~600~~788

07.~~246~~52

~~886~~433

~~993~~452

06.~~229~~60

~~228~~96

Wharf Mine, USA(6)

100%

109,~~180~~681

0.~~017~~55

~~175~~171

4952,~~155~~116

0.~~017~~61

~~845~~1,104

5961,~~335~~797

0.~~017~~60

1,~~019~~185

2672,~~735~~881

0.~~018~~63

~~470~~1,487

Wilco Project, USA(9)

100%

—

2523,~~736~~348

0.~~021~~71

531

Total Gold

~~101~~149,~~813~~022

0.~~013~~20

~~1,374~~935

~~107~~101,~~469~~683

0.~~022~~65

2,~~370~~131

~~209~~250,~~282~~705

0.~~018~~38

3,~~744~~066

~~177~~256,~~839~~131

0.~~013~~47

23,~~273~~837

3538

Summary Silver Mineral Resources at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(11)

Summary Silver Mineral Resources at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025(1)(2)(3)(11)

Measured Mineral Resources

Indicated Mineral Resources

Measured + Indicated Mineral Resources

Inferred Mineral Resources

CoeurOwnership

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (~~oz.~~grams/~~ton~~tonne)

Ounces(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (~~oz.~~grams/~~ton~~tonne)

Ounces(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (~~oz.~~grams/~~ton~~tonne)

Ounces(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (~~oz.~~grams/~~ton~~tonne)

Ounces(000s)

Mexico

Palmarejo Mine, Mexico(4)

100%

64,~~996~~598

494.5999

3214,~~138~~042

1512,~~368~~197

3108.7628

5742,~~777~~462

2216,~~363~~795

4104.0264

8956,~~915~~505

619,~~577~~203

597.2864

3460,~~748~~281

Las Chispas Mine, Mexico(10)

100%

~~116~~282

3177.1583

~~3,623~~707

1,~~094~~700

9103.8736

105,~~798~~650

1,~~211~~983

1199.9172

146,~~421~~357

12,~~276~~117

7172.9084

1011,~~088~~767

United States

Rochester Mine, USA(7)

100%

82133,~~371~~346

09.2801

2338,~~383~~621

4034,~~402~~996

011.3445

1312,~~541~~882

~~122~~168,~~773~~342

09.3052

3651,~~924~~503

~~116~~138,~~521~~129

012.3637

4154,~~838~~925

Wilco Project, USA(9)

100%

—

2523,~~736~~348

04.1346

3,346

Canada

Silvertip Mine, Canada(8)

100%

~~734~~1,173

10244.5647

79,~~749~~219

67,~~418~~171

7209.7881

4948,~~919~~369

78,~~152~~343

8214.0668

57,~~668~~588

21,~~345~~960

6181.8640

1611,~~084~~433

Total Silver

90139,~~217~~399

013.7497

6662,~~894~~589

6356,~~282~~064

260.0967

~~132~~109,~~035~~364

~~153~~195,~~499~~463

127.3036

~~198~~171,~~929~~953

~~152~~184,~~456~~758

023.7086

~~106~~141,~~104~~752

Summary Zinc Mineral Resources at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(11)

Summary Zinc Mineral Resources at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025(1)(2)(3)(11)

Measured Mineral Resources

Indicated Mineral Resources

Measured + Indicated Mineral Resources

Inferred Mineral Resources

CoeurOwnership

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (%)

Pounds(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (%)

Pounds(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (%)

Pounds(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (%)

Pounds(000s)

Canada

Silvertip Mine, Canada(8)

100%

~~734~~1,173

96.960

~~145~~170,~~703~~611

67,~~418~~171

106.773

1,~~371~~063,~~074~~609

78,~~152~~343

~~10.~~6.71

1,~~516~~234,~~777~~220

21,~~345~~960

106.331

~~481~~272,~~791~~616

Summary Lead Mineral Resources at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024(1)(2)(3)(11)

Summary Lead Mineral Resources at End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025(1)(2)(3)(11)

Measured Mineral Resources

Indicated Mineral Resources

Measured + Indicated Mineral Resources

Inferred Mineral Resources

CoeurOwnership

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (%)

Pounds(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (%)

Pounds(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (%)

Pounds(000s)

~~Tons~~Tonnes (000s)

Grade (%)

Pounds(000s)

Canada

Silvertip Mine, Canada(8)

100%

~~734~~1,173

74.961

~~115~~119,~~648~~213

67,~~418~~171

53.158

~~653~~566,~~008~~286

78,~~152~~343

53.473

~~768~~685,~~656~~499

21,~~345~~960

4.3.12

~~199~~134,~~815~~694

(1) Certain definitions:

The term “resource” means that it is a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. Inferred, Indicated, and Measured resources are in order of increasing confidence based on level of underlying geological evidence. The term ‘inferred resource’ is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. The term “limited geological evidence” means evidence that is only sufficient to establish that geological and grade or quality continuity is more likely than not. The level of geological uncertainty associated an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability and must have a reasonable expectation that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated or measured mineral resources with continued exploration. In addition, no assurances can be given that any mineral resource estimate will ultimately be reclassified as proven or probable mineral reserves or that inferred resources will be upgraded to measured or indicated resources.

(2) In-Situ Mineral Resource estimates are reported exclusive of mineral reserves, are current as of December 31, ~~2024~~2025, are reported using definitions in Item 1300 of Regulation S-K and were prepared by the Company’s technical staff.

(3) Assumed metal prices for ~~2024~~2025 estimated Mineral Resources were $2730.00 per ounce of silver, $2,~~100~~500 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound of zinc, $1.00 per pound of lead, unless otherwise noted.

(4) Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: ~~Assumption~~assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold equivalent cut-off grade that ranges from 10.8393–21.1062 g/ttonne AuEq; metallurgical recovery assumption of 9295.04% for gold and 8387.01% for silver; variable mining costs that range from US$5732.6729–US$7443.4508/tonne,; surface haulage costs of US$4.2940/tonne,; process costs of US$3130.0602/tonne,; general and administrative costs of US$1514.9517/tonne,; and surface/auxiliary support costs of US$43.4252/tonne. Excludes the impact of the Franco-Nevada gold stream agreement at Palmarejo in calculation of Mineral Resources.

(5) Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: ~~metal price of $2,300 per ounce gold,~~ assumption of conventional longhole underground mining; reported above a variable gold cut-off grade of 0.~~115~~108 oz/ton Au; metallurgical recovery assumption of 94.25%; gold payability of 97.5%,; mining costs of US$~~116~~127.0932/ton mined; process costs of US$5551.1448/ton processed; general and administrative costs of US$5349.1874/ton processed; ~~Sustaining~~sustaining capital US$45.5079/ton processed; and concentrate refining and shipping costs of US$97104.4873/oz sold.

(6) Mineral Resource estimates use the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional open pit mining; reported above a ~~gold~~NSR cut-off grade of 013.~~008 oz~~42$/ton Au; average metallurgical recovery assumption of 78.0% across all rock types; royalty burden of US$~~140~~112.4000/oz Au; pit slope angles that vary from 34–50º; mining costs of $2.5671/ton mined,; process costs of US$1213.0242/ton processed (includes general & administrative and sustaining capital costs).

(7) Mineral Resource estimates are tabulated within a confining pit shell and use the following input parameters: Rochester oxide variable recovery Au = 7771.72–85.9% and Ag = 59.4%; and Rochester sulfide variable recovery Au = 15.2–77.7% and Ag = 0.0–59.4%, with a net smelter return cut-off of $4.12/ton oxide and US$4.22/ton sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 88.4% and Ag = 59.4%, with a net smelter return ~~cutoff~~cut-off of $34.7692/ton for oxide;

3639

~~oxide and US$3.86/ton sulfide; Nevada Packard oxide recovery Au = 92.0% and Ag = 61.0%; with a net smelter return cutoff of $4.24/ton for oxide;~~ Lincoln Hill oxide recovery Au = 61-63.9% and Ag = 18.5-39.5%;, with a net smelter return ~~cutoff~~cut-off of $45.5302/ton for oxide, where the NSR is calculated as ~~resource~~ net smelter return (NSR) = silver grade (oz/ton) * silver recovery (%) * (silver price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)) + gold grade (oz/ton) * gold recovery (%) * (gold price ($/oz) - refining cost ($/oz)); variable pit slope angles that approximately average 48º over the life-of-mine.

(8) Underground Mineral Resource estimates are reported using a net smelter return (“NSR”) ~~cutoff~~cut-off of US$130/tonne. Mineral Resources are reported ~~insitu~~in-situ using the following assumptions: The estimates use the following key input parameters: lead recovery of 89-90%, zinc recovery of 82-83% and silver recovery of 83-84%. Lead concentrate grade of 53-54%; zinc concentrate grade of 56-57%; mining costs of US$68.77/tonne; processing costs of US$58.20/tonne and US$46.49/tonne, where the NSR ($/tonne) = tonnes x grade x metal prices x metallurgical recoveries – royalties – TCRCs – transport costs over the life of the mine. ~~2023 metal prices were used to determine the mineral resource which were $25.00 per ounce of silver, $1.30 per pound of zinc, $1.00 per pound of lead.~~

(9) Open Pit Mineral Resource estimates are reported using an equivalent gold ~~cutoff~~cut-off of 0.20 ounces per ton assuming a silver to gold ratio of 60:1. Resources are reported in-situ and contained ~~withed~~within a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred optimized pit shell. Silver price of US$2022/oz, gold price of US$1,~~400~~350/oz. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 70%, average carbonaceous gold recovery is 50%. Average oxide and sulfide gold recovery is 60%. Average carbonaceous silver recovery is 50%. Open pit mining cost is US$1.50/ton, processing and processing and G&A cost is US$5.46/ton; average pit slope angles of 50º. The technical and economic parameters are those that were used in the 2018 Resource Estimation. Based on the QPs review of the estimate, there would be no material change to the mineral resources if a gold price of US$1,700/oz, a silver price of US$22/oz or economic parameters were updated. Therefore the 2018 Mineral Resource report is considered current and is presented unchanged.

(10) Mineral Resource estimates uses the following key input parameters: assumption of conventional underground mining; reported above a silver ~~cut-off grade of 205 g / tonne silver~~ equivalent ~~and an incremental development~~ cut-off grade (AgEq) of 54140 g / tonne ~~AgEq~~; metallurgical recovery assumption of 97.5% for silver and 98.0% for gold; mining loss of 2% for development and 5% for stoping was applied, additional losses have been included to account for the required pillars in uphole stopes that cannot be filled; variable production mining costs that range from US$58.06–US$239.51/ttonne, development mining costs of US$27.40/ttonne, process costs of US$45.72/ttonne, site general and administrative costs of US$20.70/ttonne, underground general and administrative costs of US$12.81/ttonne, and sustaining capital costs of US$7.64/ttonne.

(11) Rounding of ~~short tons~~tonnes, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between ~~tons~~tonnes, grades, and contained metal contents.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

See Note 1718 -- Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Information pertaining to mine safety matters is reported in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in Exhibit 95.1 attached to this Form 10-K.

3740

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol CDE. The Company recently applied for listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”). Approval of the listing remains subject to the TSX’s final review and acceptance.

On February 1716, ~~2025~~2026, there were ~~638~~642,~~557~~097,~~875~~555 outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock which were held by approximately ~~1,012~~981 stockholders of record. On February 14, the Company completed the closing of the Transaction to acquire SilverCrest. Coeur acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of SilverCrest in exchange for 239,331,799 common shares. In connection with the Transaction, Coeur increased the authorized common shares for issuance to 900,000,000 common shares.

Pursuant to a privately negotiated agreement dated March 14, 2024, Coeur exchanged $5.867 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.125% Senior Notes due 2029 for 1,771,651 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Shares”). The issuance of the Shares was pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements afforded by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.41

STOCK PERFORMANCE CHART

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG COEUR MINING, S&P 500 INDEX AND PEER GROUP INDEX

The following performance graph compares the performance of the Company’s common stock during the period beginning December 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ending December 31, ~~2024~~2025 to (i) S&P 500, and (ii) the Arca Gold Miners Index (the “TSR Peer Group”), which the Company began using as its peer group index solely for purposes of the relative total stockholder return (“TSR”) calculation under the Company’s equity compensation program beginning in 2023.

The graph assumes a $100 investment in the Company’s common stock and in each of the indexes at the beginning of the period, and a reinvestment of dividends paid on such investments throughout the five-year period.

Dec.2019

Dec.2020

Dec.2021

Dec.2022

Dec.2023

Dec.2024

Dec.2020

Dec.2021

Dec.2022

Dec.2023

Dec.2024

Dec.2025

Coeur Mining

100.000

~~128~~48.0970

6232.3846

4131.5850

4055.3527

70172.7927

S&P 500 Index

100.000

~~118~~128.4071

~~152~~105.3940

~~124~~133.7910

~~157~~166.5940

~~197~~196.0216

TSR Peer Group

100.000

~~122~~89.5013

~~109~~79.1898

9787.9702

~~106~~94.6098

~~116~~242.3555

3942

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Coeur Mining, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”, “our”, or “we”). We use certain non-GAAP financial performance measures in our MD&A. For a detailed description of these measures, please see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures” at the end of this Item. We provide Costs applicable to sales (“CAS”) allocation, referred to as the co-product method, based on revenue contribution for Palmarejo and Rochester and based on the primary metal, referred to as the by-product method, for Wharf. Revenue from secondary metal, such as silver at Wharf, is treated as a cost credit.

Overview

We are primarily a gold and silver producer with operating assets located in the United States and Mexico and an exploration project in Canada.

~~2024~~2025 Highlights

For the full year ~~2024~~2025, Coeur reported revenue of $12,070.1 ~~billion~~million and cash provided by operating activities of $~~174~~886.29 million. We reported GAAP net income of $58585.9 million, or $0.1595 per diluted share. On a non-GAAP adjusted ~~basis1~~basis, the Company reported EBITDA of $~~339~~1,025.28 million and net income of $70493.14 million, or $0.1880 per diluted share.

•~~Strong~~Record full-year ~~2024~~gold ~~production~~ and ~~cost~~silver ~~results~~production – ~~2024~~Balanced contributions across Coeur’s portfolio led to 2025 full-year production of ~~341~~419,~~582~~046 ounces of gold and 1117.49 million ounces of silver, ~~represented~~representing year-over-year increases of 823% and 1157%, respectively, ~~and fell solidly~~ within the ~~2024~~Company’s ~~guidance~~2025 ~~ranges.~~consolidated ~~Full-year~~guidance ~~2024 costs applicable to sales per ounce1 declined year-over-year by 13% for gold and 12% for silver~~ranges

•~~Second~~Record ~~consecutive~~financial ~~quarter~~results of– ~~positive~~Fourth quarter free cash flow ~~and~~increased ~~further~~66% ~~EBITDA~~versus ~~growth~~the –prior ~~Fourth~~ quarter ~~free~~to ~~cash~~a ~~flow~~record of $16313.2 million, ~~brought~~bringing ~~total~~the ~~second~~full-year ~~half~~total ~~free cash flow~~ to $85666 million. ~~Fourth~~Adjusted EBITDA increased 60% versus the prior quarter ~~adjusted~~to ~~EBITDA~~a ofrecord $~~116~~425 million, ~~resulted~~driving inthe ~~full~~last twelve-~~year~~month ~~2024~~total ~~adjusted~~to ~~EBITDA~~over of $~~339~~1.0 ~~million~~billion. Average realized prices for gold and silver increased 21% and 39%, respectively, compared to ~~$142~~the ~~million~~third ~~in 2023~~quarter

•~~Strong~~Long-term ~~fourth~~objective ~~quarter~~of ~~results~~net ~~from~~cash ~~Rochester~~achieved – ~~Rochester’s~~Cash ~~silver~~ and ~~gold~~equivalents ~~production~~more ~~increased~~than bydoubled ~~34%~~compared ~~and~~to ~~63%,~~the ~~respectively,~~prior quarter-~~over-quarter~~end ~~to 1.6 million ounces of silver~~ and ~~15,752~~increased ~~ounces~~tenfold ofcompared ~~gold,~~to ~~bringing~~ the ~~full-~~prior year-end ~~totals~~ to ~~4.4~~$554 million; ~~silver~~total ~~ounces~~debt ~~and~~decreased ~~39,203~~42% ~~gold~~to ~~ounces.~~$341 ~~Tons~~million ~~placed~~at inDecember ~~the fourth quarter totaled 8.2 million tons~~31, ~~exceeding~~2025 ~~the~~compared ~~7.0~~to year-end ~~8.0 million tons target. Fourth quarter free cash flow of $12 million represented the first positive free cash flow quarter since the fourth quarter of 2019~~2024

•~~Further~~Strong ~~debt~~quarter ~~reductions~~at Rochester – ~~Coeur~~Silver ~~repaid~~and angold ~~additional~~production ~~$30~~at ~~million~~Rochester ofincreased ~~the~~6% ~~revolving~~and ~~credit~~20% ~~facility~~quarter-over-quarter, ~~(“RCF”)~~respectively, ~~during~~and 40% and 54% year-over-year, respectively. During the fourth quarter, ~~reducing~~both ~~the~~tonnes2 ~~outstanding~~crushed ~~balance~~and bytonnes ~~29%~~placed reached record levels, orwith ~~$80~~tonnes ~~million~~crushed ~~since~~increasing ~~mid-year~~12% to ~~$195~~6.4 million tonnes (7.0 ~~The~~million ~~Company’s~~imperial ~~net~~tons) ~~debt~~and tonnes placed increasing 23% to ~~adjusted~~9.3 ~~EBITDA~~million ~~ratio~~tonnes ~~declined~~(10.2 tomillion 1imperial tons).6x atFourth ~~year-end~~quarter free cash flow increased to $78 million compared to ~~3.4x~~$30 atmillion in the third quarter and $12 million in the fourth quarter for the prior year~~-end~~ ~~2023~~

•~~SilverCrest~~New Gold transaction ~~now~~approved ~~closed~~by stockholders – On January 27, 2026, stockholders of both Coeur and New Gold voted overwhelmingly in favor of Coeur’s ~~$1.58~~proposed ~~billion~~ acquisition of ~~SilverCrest~~New ~~Metals~~Gold Inc. (“~~SilverCrest~~New Gold”). ~~closed~~The ~~on February 14~~transaction, ~~2025,~~ which ~~adds~~remains ~~the~~on ~~high-grade,~~track ~~low-cost~~to ~~Las~~close ~~Chispas~~in ~~silver~~the ~~and~~first ~~gold~~half ~~operation~~of ~~in Sonora~~2026, ~~Mexico~~is expected to ~~the~~create ~~Company’s~~a ~~portfolio~~new, ofsector-leading, all-North American ~~assets~~senior ~~and~~precious ~~creates~~metals amining ~~leading global silver~~ company

•~~Robust~~2026 ~~expected~~guidance ~~2025~~highlights ~~production~~portfolio ~~growth~~strength ~~positions~~– ~~Coeur~~The ~~for~~Company ~~record~~expects ~~results~~2026 –gold ~~2025~~and silver production ~~guidance~~from ~~ranges~~Coeur’s current portfolio of ~~380~~assets of 390,000 - ~~440~~460,000 ounces ~~of gold~~ and 1618.72 - 2021.3 million ounces, ofrespectively, ~~silver~~driven ~~represent~~by ~~expected~~strong ~~year-over-year~~contributions ~~increases~~across ofthe ~~20% and 62%~~portfolio, ~~respectively.~~including ~~These ranges reflect the~~ expected ~~benefit~~continued ofgrowth ~~the~~at ~~recently~~Rochester ~~acquired Las Chispas operation~~ and ~~the~~a ~~first~~ full- year of production ~~from~~at ~~the~~Las ~~newly~~Chispas. ~~expanded~~The ~~Rochester~~Company ~~operation~~plans ~~totaling~~to ~~7.0~~issue -guidance ~~8.3~~including ~~million~~New ~~silver~~Gold’s ~~ounces~~two ~~and 60~~assets,~~000~~ -the ~~75,000~~New ~~gold~~Afton ~~ounces,~~and ~~representing~~Rainy ~~year-over-year~~River ~~expected~~mines, ~~increases~~upon closing of ~~75%~~the ~~and 72%, respectively~~transaction

4043

Selected Financial and Operating Results

	Year Ended December 31,
		2024		2023		2022
		2025		2024		2023
Financial Results: (in thousands, except per share amounts)
Gold sales		$	~~734~~1,~~861~~343,729	$	~~575~~734,~~677~~861	$	~~572~~575,~~877~~677
Silver sales		$	~~319~~726,~~145~~397	$	~~245~~319,~~529~~145	$	~~212~~245,~~759~~529
Consolidated Revenue		$	1,054,006	$	821,206	$	785,636
Consolidated revenue		$	2,070,126	$	1,054,006	$	821,206
Net income (loss)		$	58,900	$	(103,612)	$	(78,107)
Net income		$	585,872	$	58,900	$	(103,612)
Net income (loss) per share, diluted		$	0.15	$	(0.30)	$	(0.28)
Net income per share, diluted		$	0.95	$	0.15	$	(0.30)
Adjusted net income (loss)(1)		$	70493,~~117~~361	$	~~(78~~70,~~048)~~117	$	(8978,~~059~~048)
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, diluted(1)		$	0.1880	$	(0.~~23)~~18	$	(0.3223)
EBITDA(1)		$	~~302~~964,~~600~~579	$	60302,~~465~~600	$	7260,~~038~~465
Adjusted EBITDA(1)		$	~~339~~1,~~152~~025,772	$	~~142~~339,~~302~~152	$	~~138~~142,~~954~~302
Total debt(2)		$	~~590~~340,~~058~~533	$	~~545~~590,~~310~~058	$	~~515~~545,~~933~~310
Operating Results:
Gold ounces produced		~~341~~419,~~582~~046		~~317~~341,~~671~~582		~~330~~317,~~346~~671
Silver ounces produced		1117,~~389~~914,~~519~~682		1011,~~250~~389,~~906~~519		910,~~816~~250,~~680~~906
Gold ounces sold		~~340~~422,~~816~~032		~~315~~340,~~511~~816		~~329~~315,~~968~~511
Silver ounces sold		1118,~~418~~155,~~821~~235		1011,~~140~~418,~~405~~821		910,~~771~~140,~~724~~405
Average realized price per gold ounce		$	23,~~156~~184	$	12,~~825~~156	$	1,~~736~~825
Average realized price per silver ounce		$	2740.9501	$	2427.2195	$	2124.7721

(1)See “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”. Includes costs of $93.5 million related to the purchase price allocation (“PPA”) ascribed to Inventory at Las Chispas.

(2)Includes finance leases. Net of debt issuance costs and premium received.

Consolidated Financial Results

Year Ended December 31, 2025 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Revenue

We sold 422,032 gold ounces and 18.2 million silver ounces, compared to 340,816 gold ounces and 11.4 million silver ounces. Revenue increased by $1,016.1 million, or 96%, as a result of a 24% and 59% increase in gold and silver ounces sold (includes $421.4 million of post-acquisition sales at Las Chispas), and a 45% and 43% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively. The increase in gold ounces sold was the result of post-acquisition sales at Las Chispas, higher placement rates and grades at Rochester, and higher mill throughput at Kensington, partially offset by lower grades at Palmarejo. The increase in silver ounces sold was the result of post-acquisition sales at Las Chispas, and higher silver ounces recovered at Rochester as a result of higher placement rates, partially offset by lower silver grades at Palmarejo. Gold and silver represented 65% and 35% of 2025 sales revenue, respectively, compared to 70% and 30% of 2024 sales revenue, respectively.

The following table summarizes consolidated metal sales:


	Year Ended December 31,		Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
In thousands		2025			2024
Gold sales			$	1,343,729		$	734,861	$	608,868	83	%
Silver sales			726,397			319,145		407,252		128	%
Metal sales			$	2,070,126		$	1,054,006	$	1,016,120	96	%

Costs Applicable to Sales

Costs applicable to sales increased $292.2 million, or 48%, primarily driven by post-acquisition gold and silver ounces sold at Las Chispas that includes the impact of the PPA ascribed to Inventory of $93.5 million, higher gold and silver ounces sold at Rochester, higher gold ounces sold at Kensington, and operating costs (royalties) at Rochester, Kensington, and Wharf, partially offset by lower gold and silver ounces sold at Palmarejo. For a complete discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.

Amortization

Amortization increased $126.1 million, or 101%, as a result of post-acquisition gold and silver ounces sold at Las Chispas, increased production at Rochester and Kensington, and the full-year impact of the commissioning of the newly expanded crushing circuit at Rochester in March 2024, partially offset by lower gold and silver ounces sold at Palmarejo and Wharf.

Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $9.5 million, or 20%, primarily due to higher stock-based compensation and annual incentive costs, partially offset by lower outside service and legal costs.

Exploration expense increased $26.9 million, or 45%, driven by planned higher resource expansion drilling activity at all locations, including the addition of exploration expense at Las Chispas post-acquisition.

Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses increased $18.5 million, or 36%, as a result of higher transaction costs, the Wage and Hour Litigation settlement, and higher asset retirement accretion following the 2024 year-end changes to estimates, partially offset by lower loss on the sale of assets.

The following table summarizes pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses:


	Year Ended December 31,		Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
In thousands		2025					2024
Silvertip ongoing carrying costs				10,440			8,513		1,927		23	%
Loss (gain) on sale of assets				698			4,250		(3,552)		(84)	%
Asset retirement accretion				19,697			16,778		2,919		17	%
Kensington royalty litigation settlement				(95)			7,156		(7,251)		100	%
Transaction costs				26,409			8,517		17,892		210	%
Wage and Hour Litigation settlement				7,059			—		7,059		100	%
Other				5,580			6,059		(479)		(8)	%
Pre-development, reclamation and other expense				$	69,788		$	51,273	$	18,515	36	%

Other Income and Expenses

Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $1.1 million) decreased to $30.9 million from $51.3 million due to lower interest paid under the RCF attributable to lower average debt levels and interest rate, partially offset by higher interest paid under finance lease obligations. The RCF had no outstanding amount drawn as of December 31, 2025.

Other, net decreased to a gain of $6.9 million compared to $13.0 million as a result of the recognition of gains in 2024

related to premiums received from the private placement flow-through share offering (“Private Placement Offering”), and lower gains on foreign exchange rates.

Income and Mining Taxes

The Company’s Income and mining tax (expense) benefit consisted of:


	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands	2025		%		2024		%
U.S. federal statutory tax rate	$	(143,428)	21.0	%	$	(26,534)	21.0	%
State income and mining taxes, net of federal benefit(1)	(37,331)		5.5		(11,313)		9.0
Foreign tax effects
Mexico
Foreign tax rate differences	(30,341)		4.4		(11,253)		8.9
Foreign permanent differences	1,893		(0.3)		(1,384)		1.1
Mining taxes, net of income tax benefit	(27,276)		4.0		(8,865)		7.0
Change in valuation allowance	4,520		(0.7)		—		—
Foreign withholding taxes	(10,821)		1.6		(6,900)		5.5
Foreign exchange rates	(38,893)		5.7		1,434		(1.1)
Foreign inflation and indexing	5,724		(0.8)		2,230		(1.8)
Uncertain tax positions	(28,820)		4.2		—		—
Enactment of 1% increase in Mexico special mining duty tax	—		—		(1,696)		1.3
Other, net	2,967		(0.4)		(175)		0.1
Canada
Foreign tax rate difference	(2,954)		0.4		(2,434)		1.9
Provincial tax	5,907		(0.9)		4,868		(3.9)
Canadian flow through shares permanent	(3,802)		0.6		(7,246)		5.7
Change in valuation allowance	(9,481)		1.4		(3,746)		3.0
Foreign withholding taxes	(3,460)		0.5		(1,523)		1.2
Other	(3,427)		0.5		40		—
Other foreign jurisdictions
Other	(420)		0.1		(456)		0.4
Effect of cross border tax laws
Subpart F income	(32)		—		(1,345)		1.1
Change in valuation allowance	208,938		(30.6)		4,011		(3.2)
Nondeductible items
Percentage depletion	21,092		(3.1)		6,974		(5.5)
Equity compensation	1,321		(0.2)		(1,205)		1.0
Other nondeductible items	(2,185)		0.3		(769)		0.6
Other adjustments
Other	(6,357)		1.0		(163)		0.1
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit	$	(96,666)	14.2	%	$	(67,450)	53.4	%

(1)State mining taxes in South Dakota, Nevada, and Alaska made up the majority (greater than 50 percent) of the state tax effect.

Income and mining tax expense of approximately $96.7 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 14.2% for 2025. This compares to income tax expense of $67.5 million for an effective tax rate of 53.4% for 2024. The comparability of the Company’s income and mining tax (expense) benefit and effective tax rate for the reported periods was impacted by multiple factors, primarily: (i) U.S. valuation allowance release; (ii) variations in our income before income taxes; (iii) geographic distribution of that income; (iv) foreign exchange rates; (v) mining taxes; (vi) the impact of uncertain tax positions; (vii) percentage depletion; and (viii) 2024 enactment of a 1% increase in Mexico’s special mining duty tax. Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances increased income and mining tax expense by $43.5 million and decreased by $0.3 million for the years ended 2025 and 2024, respectively. The impact of foreign exchange rates on deferred tax balances is predominantly due to the Mexican Peso and deferred taxes resulting from Las Chispas PPA. Therefore, the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, period to period.

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and mining tax (expense) benefit:


	Year ended December 31,
	2025				2024
In thousands	Income (loss) before tax		Tax (expense) benefit		Income (loss) before tax		Tax (expense) benefit
United States	$	403,735	$	102,058	$	50,194	$	(13,063)
Canada	(56,323)		(6,879)		(46,702)		(1,523)
Mexico	337,125		(191,845)		125,027		(52,864)
Other jurisdictions	(1,999)		—		(2,169)		—
	$	682,538	$	(96,666)	$	126,350	$	(67,450)

A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized. The Company analyzes its deferred tax assets and, if it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will record or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if it is determined that the Company will ultimately be more likely than not able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of factors that impact the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets. For additional information, please see “Item 1A - Risk Factors”.

The Company has historically provided a valuation allowance against its U.S. net deferred tax assets. In 2025, the Company released $209.8 million of valuation allowance against its U.S. net deferred tax assets, resulting in a non-cash deferred tax benefit. The $209.8 million valuation allowance release is composed of $73.3 million related to current year income and $136.5 million related to forecasted future year income. The timing of this valuation allowance release was primarily due to the cumulative income position for the most recent three-year period and projected future earnings.

The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against approximately $52.4 million of U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2025, because the Company has concluded that it is not more likely than not to be realized.

The exact timing and amount of any valuation allowance release are subject to change, depending upon the level of profitability that the Company is able to achieve and the net deferred tax assets available.

Net Income

Net income was $585.9 million, or $0.95 per diluted share, compared to $58.9 million, or $0.15 per diluted share. The increase in net income was driven by a 24% and 59% increase in gold and silver ounces sold (includes $421.4 million of post-acquisition sales at Las Chispas), a 45% and 43% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, lower interest expense, and a tax benefit of $160.0 million related to the expectation that our U.S. deferred tax assets are now expected to be used before expiration. This was partially offset by higher exploration, general and administrative, and transaction costs, and the Wage and Hour Litigation settlement of $6.1 million, plus the employer’s share of relevant taxes. Adjusted net income was $493.4 million, or $0.80 per diluted share, compared to $70.1 million, or $0.18 per diluted share (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”).

Year Ended December 31, 2024 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

Revenue

We sold 340,816 gold ounces and 11.4 million silver ounces, compared to 315,511 gold ounces and 10.1 million silver ounces. Revenue increased by $232.8 million, or 28%, as a result of an 18% and 15% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, and an 8% and 13% increase in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively. The increase in gold ounces sold was due to higher gold production at all sites, specifically higher grade and recovery rates at Palmarejo, the successful completion of the Rochester expansion, higher mill throughput and grade at Kensington, and higher ~~tons~~tonnes and grade at Wharf. The increase in silver ounces sold was the result of higher grade and recovery rates at Palmarejo, and the successful completion of the Rochester expansion. Gold and silver represented 70% and 30%, respectively, of both 2024 and 2023 sales revenue.

The following table summarizes consolidated metal sales:


	Year Ended December 31,				Increase (Decrease)		Percentage Change
In thousands	2024		2023
Gold sales	$	734,861	$	575,677	$	159,184	28	%
Silver sales	319,145		245,529		73,616		30	%
Metal sales	$	1,054,006	$	821,206	$	232,800	28	%

Costs Applicable to Sales

Costs applicable to sales decreased $26.7 million, or 4%, primarily due to higher recoverable ounces placed on the leach pad at Wharf, an increase in estimated recoverable ounces on the legacy leach pad in the first quarter of 2024 at Rochester, lower net realizable value (“LCM”) adjustments at Rochester, and the favorable impact of exchange rates at Palmarejo, partially offset by higher gold and silver ounces sold at all sites. For a complete discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.

Amortization

Amortization increased $25.2 million, or 25%, and resulted primarily from higher gold and silver ounces sold at all sites and, at Rochester, the commencement of production of the new leach pad in mid-September 2023, and the three-stage crushing circuit in March 2024, partially offset by lower LCM adjustments.

Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $6.1 million, or 15%, primarily due to higher employee compensation, outside service and legal costs.

Exploration expense increased $28.7 million, or 93%, driven by the sustained increased drilling at Palmarejo, Rochester, Wharf and Silvertip in 2024, and the Canadian mining exploration tax credits associated with expenditures at the Silvertip exploration project recognized in 2023.

Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses decreased $3.4 million, or 6%, stemming from lower losses on the sale of assets and lower ongoing carrying costs at Silvertip, partially offset by the Kensington royalty litigation settlement of $7.2 million and transaction costs of $8.5 million related to the acquisition of SilverCrest.

The following table summarizes pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses:

	Year Ended December 31,		Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
In thousands		2024					~~2023~~		2023
Silvertip ongoing carrying costs				~~8,513~~$	8,513		~~15,616~~$	15,616	~~(7,103)~~$	(7,103)	(45)	%
Loss on sale of assets				4,250			12,879		(8,629)		(67)	%
(Gain) Loss on sale of assets				4,250			12,879		(8,629)		(67)	%
Asset retirement accretion				16,778			16,405		373		2	%
Kensington royalty litigation settlement				7,156			—		7,156		100	%
Kensington royalty settlement				7,156			—		7,156		100	%
Transaction costs				8,517			—		8,517		100	%
Other				6,059			9,736		(3,677)		(38)	%
Pre-development, reclamation and other expense				$	51,273		$	54,636	$	(3,363)	(6)	%

Other Income and Expenses

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company incurred a $0.4 million gain in connection with the exchange of $5.9 million in aggregate principal amount plus accrued interest of 2029 Senior Notes for 1.8 million shares of common stock compared to $3.4 million incurred in connection with the exchange of $76.0 million in aggregate principal amount plus accrued interest for 25.2 million shares of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2023.

The Company did not have fair value adjustments, net, during the year ended December 31, 2024 following the sale of the Company’s equity investments in 2023.

Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $1.1 million) increased to $51.3 million from $29.1 million due to higher interest paid under the RCF attributable to higher average debt levels and higher interest paid under financial leases, partially offset by lower interest payable following the extinguishment of $5.9 million in 2029 Senior Notes.

Other, net increased to a gain of $13.0 million compared to loss $7.5 million as a result of the recognition of the net proceeds received in excess of the Company’s trading price (“FT Premium Liability”) as income of $5.6 million following the renouncement of Silvertip exploration expenditures, favorable foreign exchange rates, particularly in Mexico, and the $12.3 million loss recognized from the sale of the contingent consideration received in connection with the sale of La Preciosa project (the “La Preciosa Deferred Consideration”) in 2023.

Income and Mining Taxes

	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands	2024		2023
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit at statutory rate	$	(28,465)	14,376
State tax provision from continuing operations	(149)		4,859
Change in valuation allowance	727		(36,778)
Percentage depletion	6,974		5,649
Uncertain tax positions	2		6
U.S. and foreign permanent differences	(7,765)		(3,056)
Foreign exchange rates	2,405		1,179
Foreign inflation and indexing	2,322		3,077
Foreign tax rate differences	(8,923)		(3,911)
Foreign withholding and other taxes	(8,307)		(1,381)
Mining Taxes	(26,901)		(16,884)
Sale of non-core assets	—		(1,322)
Enactment of 1% increase in Mexico special mining duty tax	(1,696)		—
Other, net	2,326		(970)
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit	$	(67,450)	$	(35,156)

The Company’s Income and mining tax (expense) benefit consisted of:


	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands	2024		%		2023		%
U.S. federal statutory tax rate	$	(26,534)	21.0	%	$	14,376	21.0	%
State income and mining taxes, net of federal benefit(1)	(11,313)		9.0		(1,468)		(2.2)
Foreign tax effects
Mexico
Foreign tax rate differences	(11,253)		8.9		(5,848)		(8.6)
Foreign permanent differences	(1,384)		1.1		(1,190)		(1.7)
Mining taxes, net of income tax benefit	(8,865)		7.0		(6,513)		(9.5)
Foreign withholding taxes	(6,900)		5.5		—		—
Foreign exchange rates	1,434		(1.1)		1,172		1.7
Foreign inflation and indexing	2,230		(1.8)		2,858		4.2
Sale of non-core assets	—		—		(1,322)		(1.9)
Enactment of 1% increase in Mexico special mining duty tax	(1,696)		1.3		—		—
Other, net	(175)		0.1		(547)		(0.8)
Canada
Foreign tax rate difference	(2,434)		1.9		(2,015)		(3.0)
Provincial tax	4,868		(3.9)		4,029		5.9
Canadian flow through shares permanent	(7,246)		5.7		(3,448)		(5.0)
Change in valuation allowance	(3,746)		3.0		(5,986)		(8.8)
Foreign withholding taxes	(1,523)		1.2		(848)		(1.2)
Other	40		—		369		0.5
Other foreign jurisdictions
Other	(456)		0.4		(117)		(0.2)
Effect of cross border tax laws
Subpart F income	(1,345)		1.1		(758)		(1.1)
Change in valuation allowance	4,011		(3.2)		(30,242)		(44.2)
Nondeductible items
Percentage depletion	6,974		(5.5)		5,649		8.3
Equity compensation	(1,205)		1.0		(780)		(1.1)
Other nondeductible items	(769)		0.6		(1,502)		(2.2)
Other adjustments
Effect of tax rate changes	—		—		(1,659)		(2.4)
Other	(163)		0.1		634		0.9
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit	$	(67,450)	53.4	%	$	(35,156)	(51.4)	%

(1)State mining taxes in South Dakota, Nevada, and Alaska made up the majority (greater than 50 percent) of the state tax effect.

Income and mining tax expense of approximately $67.5 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 53.4% for 2024. This compares to income tax expense of $35.2 million for an effective tax rate of (51.4)% for 2023. The comparability of the Company’s income and mining tax (expense) benefit and effective tax rate for the reported periods was impacted by multiple factors, primarily: (i) mining taxes; (ii) variations in our income before income taxes; (iii) geographic distribution of that income; (iv) foreign exchange rates; (v) Mexico mining tax rate increase; (vi) percentage depletion; (vii) the sale of non-core assets; and (viii) the impact of uncertain tax positions. Therefore, the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, period to period.

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and mining tax (expense) benefit:


	Year ended December 31,
	2024				2023
In thousands	Income (loss) before tax		Tax (expense) benefit		Income (loss) before tax		Tax (expense) benefit
United States	$	50,194	$	(13,063)	$	(107,021)	$	(6,956)
Canada	(46,702)		(1,523)		(33,574)		(848)
Mexico	125,027		(52,864)		72,697		(27,352)
Other jurisdictions	(2,169)		—		(558)		—
	$	126,350	$	(67,450)	$	(68,456)	$	(35,156)

Net Income (Loss)

Net income was $58.9 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $103.6 million, or $0.30 per diluted share. The increase in net income was driven by a 18% and 15% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, and a 8% and 13% increase in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively, lower ongoing costs at Silvertip, the recognition of the FT Premium Liability income of $5.6 million, lower LCM adjustments at Rochester, and the $12.3 million loss recognized from the sale of the La Preciosa Deferred Consideration in 2023. This was partially offset by the Kensington royalty settlement of $7.2 million, transaction costs of $8.5 million related to the acquisition of SilverCrest, and higher exploration and income and mining taxes expense. Adjusted net income was $70.1 million, or $0.18 per diluted share, compared to adjusted net loss of $78.0 million, or $0.23 per diluted share (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”).

~~Year~~2026 ~~Ended December 31, 2023 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022~~Guidance

~~Revenue~~The Company has provided guidance for full-year 2026 including production, CAS, capital expenditures, depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”), exploration, general and administrative expenses (“G&A”), and income and mining tax.

WeOverall ~~sold~~cost ~~315,511~~guidance ~~gold~~reflects ~~ounces~~higher ~~and~~expected ~~10.1~~royalty ~~million~~expense ~~silver~~driven ~~ounces,~~by ~~compared~~stronger torealized ~~329~~metal prices,~~968~~ ~~gold~~particularly ~~ounces~~at ~~and~~Rochester, ~~9.8~~the ~~million~~impact ~~silver~~of ~~ounces.~~a ~~Revenue~~stronger ~~increased~~Mexican ~~by $35.6 million~~peso, orinflation ~~5%, as a result~~ of ~~a 4~~3% ~~increase~~to ~~in silver ounces sold and a~~ 5% ~~and~~across ~~11%~~the ~~increase~~portfolio, ~~in average realized gold~~ and ~~silver~~higher ~~prices,~~planned ~~respectively,~~maintenance ~~partially offset by a 4% decrease in gold ounces sold~~costs. ~~The~~For ~~decrease~~our inco-product ~~gold~~mines ~~ounces~~(Las ~~sold~~Chispas, ~~was primarily due to lower mill throughput at~~ Palmarejo, ~~and Kensington and lower grades at Kensington~~Rochester), ~~partially~~costs ~~offset~~are byallocated ~~the~~to ~~timing~~gold ofand ~~production~~silver ~~from~~based ~~Rochester’s~~on ~~new~~their ~~leach~~relative ~~pad~~revenue ~~related~~contribution. toGiven ~~startup of~~ the ~~new~~higher ~~process~~expected ~~plant~~contribution ~~and timing~~ of ~~recoveries at Wharf. The increase in~~ silver ~~ounces~~to ~~sold~~total ~~was~~revenue ~~primarily~~ due to the ~~timing~~silver ~~of production on Rochester~~price’s ~~new~~outperformance ~~leach~~relative ~~pad related~~ to ~~startup of~~ the ~~new~~gold ~~process plant~~price, ~~partially~~silver ~~offset~~CAS byper ~~lower~~ounce ~~mill~~is ~~throughput~~expected atto ~~Palmarejo.~~be ~~Gold~~higher ~~and~~in ~~silver~~2026, ~~represented~~consistent ~~70%~~with ~~and~~the ~~30%~~trend ofseen ~~2023~~in ~~sales~~the ~~revenue,~~second ~~respectively,~~half ~~compared to 73% and 27%~~ of ~~2022 sales revenue, respectively~~2025.

~~The following table summarizes consolidated metal sales:~~ 50

	Year Ended December 31,				Increase (Decrease)		Percentage Change
In thousands	2023		2022
Gold sales	$	575,677	$	572,877	$	2,800	—	%
Silver sales	245,529		212,759		32,770		15	%
Metal sales	$	821,206	$	785,636	$	35,570	5	%

2026 Production Guidance

Costs Applicable to Sales


	Gold	Silver
	(oz)	(K oz)
Las Chispas	55,000 - 65,000	5,500 - 6,300
Palmarejo	95,000 - 105,000	6,250 - 7,000
Rochester	70,000 - 90,000	6,400 - 7,800
Kensington	98,000 - 110,000	—
Wharf	72,000 - 90,000	50 - 200

Total	390,000 - 460,000	18,200 - 21,300

~~Costs~~2026 ~~applicable~~Adjusted toCosts ~~sales~~Applicable ~~increased $26.4 million, or 4%, primarily due~~ to ~~the~~Sales increase in ounces sold at Rochester and Wharf and higher operating costs at Palmarejo partially offset by lower LCM adjustments at Rochester. For a complete discussion of costs applicable to sales, see Results of Operations below.Guidance

Amortization


	Gold	Silver
	($/oz)	($/oz)
Las Chispas (co-product)	$750 - $950	$12.50 - $14.50
Palmarejo (co-product)	$700 - $900	$21.50 - $23.50
Rochester (co-product)	$1,350 - $1,550	$23.00 - $25.00
Kensington	$1,750 - $1,950	—
Wharf (by-product)	$1,400 - $1,600	—

~~Amortization~~2026 ~~decreased~~Capital, ~~$11.8 million~~DD&A, ~~or 11%~~Exploration, ~~primarily~~G&A ~~due~~and toIncome ~~a decrease in gold ounces sold~~ and ~~longer~~Mining ~~assumed~~Tax ~~mine life at Kensington, partially offset by the commencement of production of the new leach pad in mid-September 2023 at Rochester.~~Guidance

Expenses


															($M)
Capital Expenditures, Sustaining															$207 - $239
Capital Expenditures, Development															$98 - $125
Exploration, Expensed															$93 - $103
Exploration, Capitalized															$27 - $33
General & Administrative Expenses															$63 - $67
Cash Income and Mining Taxes															$400 - $500
Amortization															$335 - $390
Effective Tax Rate (%)															29% - 35%

~~General~~Note: ~~and~~The ~~administrative~~Company’s ~~expenses~~guidance ~~increased~~figures assume estimated prices of $24,550/oz gold and $77.50/oz silver as well as CAD of 1.38 ~~million,~~and orMXN ~~5%,~~of ~~primarily~~18.00. ~~due~~Guidance tofigures ~~higher~~exclude ~~employee-related~~the ~~costs~~impact of any metal sales or foreign exchange hedges.

~~Exploration~~The ~~expense~~normalized ~~increased~~effective ~~$4.3~~tax ~~million,~~rate orexcludes ~~16%,~~items ~~driven~~that byare ~~accelerated~~not ~~drilling~~reflective ~~activity~~of atCoeur’s ~~Palmarejo~~underlying performance, ~~Kensington~~such ~~and~~as ~~Silvertip,~~the ~~partially~~impacts ~~offset~~of byforeign ~~the~~currency ~~Canadian~~on ~~mining~~deferred ~~exploration~~taxes, ~~tax~~taxes ~~credits~~related ~~associated~~to ~~with~~prior ~~expenditures~~periods, atand ~~the~~one-time, ~~Silvertip~~non-cash, ~~exploration~~tax ~~project~~valuation ~~recognized~~allowance ~~in 2023~~adjustments.

Pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses increased $14.0 million, or 34%, stemming from higher asset retirement accretion, a $12.8 million loss on dismantle and disposal of the legacy crusher at Rochester, and non-operating start-up costs associated with the Rochester expansion project, partially offset by lower ongoing carrying costs at Silvertip. 51

The following table summarizes pre-development, reclamation, and other expenses:

	Year Ended December 31,		Increase (Decrease)			Percentage Change
In thousands		2023							2022
Silvertip ongoing carrying costs				$	15,616		$	20,963	$	(5,347)	(26)	%
Loss on sale of assets				12,879			(640)		13,519		(2,112)	%
Asset retirement accretion				16,405			14,232		2,173		15	%
Other				9,736			6,092		3,644		60	%
Pre-development, reclamation and other expense				$	54,636		$	40,647	$	13,989	34	%

Other Income and Expenses

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company incurred a $3.4 million gain in connection with the exchange of $76.0 million in aggregate principal amount plus accrued interest of 2029 Senior Notes for 25.2 million shares of common stock.

Fair value adjustments, net, increased to a gain of $3.4 million compared to $66.7 million loss as a result of an increase in value of the Company’s equity investments.

Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $14.6 million) increased to $29.1 million from $23.9 million. Total interest costs for 2023 increased $8.6 million to $43.7 million, due to higher interest paid under the RCF attributable to higher average debt levels, partially offset by lower interest payable following the extinguishment of $76.0 million in 2029 Senior Notes.

Other, net decreased to a loss of $7.5 million compared to a gain of $66.3 million as a result of the $12.3 million loss recognized from the sale of La Preciosa Deferred Consideration 2023 and the $62.2 million gain recognized in connection with the sale of the Sterling/Crown exploration properties in 2022.

Income and Mining Taxes

The Company’s Income and mining tax (expense) benefit consisted of:

	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands	2023		2022
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit at statutory rate	$	14,376	$	13,249
State tax provision from continuing operations	4,859		2,871
Change in valuation allowance	(36,778)		(36,670)
Percentage depletion	5,649		3,538
Uncertain tax positions	6		655
U.S. and foreign permanent differences	(3,056)		365
Foreign exchange rates	1,179		(145)
Foreign inflation and indexing	3,077		2,897
Foreign tax rate differences	(3,911)		(4,994)
Foreign withholding and other taxes	(1,381)		169
Mining Taxes	(16,884)		(11,239)
Sale of non-core assets	(1,322)		15,447
Other, net	(970)		(801)
Income and mining tax (expense) benefit	$	(35,156)	$	(14,658)

Income and mining tax expense of approximately $35.2 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 51.4% for 2023. This compares to income tax expense of $14.7 million for an effective tax rate of 23.1% for 2022. The comparability of the Company’s income and mining tax (expense) benefit and effective tax rate for the reported periods was impacted by multiple factors, primarily: (i) the sale of non-core assets; (ii) variations in our income before income taxes; (iii) geographic distribution of that income; (iv) mining taxes; (v) foreign exchange rates; (vi) percentage depletion; and (vii) the impact of uncertain tax positions. Therefore, the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, period to period.

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s income (loss) before tax and income and mining tax (expense) benefit:

	Year ended December 31,
	2023				2022
In thousands	Income (loss) before tax		Tax (expense) benefit		Income (loss) before tax		Tax (expense) benefit
United States	$	(107,021)	$	(6,956)	$	(107,477)	$	2,516
Canada	(33,574)		(848)		(32,249)		(51)
Mexico	72,697		(27,352)		77,316		(17,123)
Other jurisdictions	(558)		—		(1,039)		—
	$	(68,456)	$	(35,156)	$	(63,449)	$	(14,658)

Net Income (Loss)

Net loss was $103.6 million, or $0.30 per diluted share, compared to $78.1 million, or $0.28 per diluted share. The increase in net loss was driven by a 4% decrease in gold ounces sold, higher operating costs at Palmarejo, higher exploration costs, a $12.3 million loss on the sale of the La Preciosa Deferred Consideration, a $12.8 million loss on disposal of the legacy crusher at Rochester, and the $62.2 million gain recognized in connection with the sale of the Sterling/Crown exploration properties in 2022. This was partially offset by a 4% increase in silver ounces sold, a 5% and 11% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, favorable changes in the fair value of the Company’s equity investments, and a $3.4 million gain in connection with the exchange of 2029 Senior Notes. Adjusted net loss was $78.0 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, compared to $89.1 million, or $0.32 per diluted share (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”).

2025 Guidance

Gold and silver production is expected to increase 20% and 62%, respectively, compared to 2024 based on the midpoint of guidance ranges. The increase is primarily driven by the completion and ramp-up of Rochester last year and the addition of Las Chispas in mid-February.

Overall cost guidance has increased slightly at Palmarejo, Kensington and Wharf compared to 2024.

The below exploration expense guidance excludes $17 - $22 million of underground mine development and support costs associated with Silvertip.

Note that Las Chispas guidance reflects results from the February 14 closing of the acquisition. Additionally, Las Chispas cost guidance excludes the effects of the SilverCrest purchase price allocation.

2025 Production Guidance

	Gold	Silver
	(oz)	(K oz)
Las Chispas	42,500 - 52,500	4,250 - 5,250
Palmarejo	95,000 - 105,000	5,400 - 6,500
Rochester	60,000 - 75,000	7,000 - 8,300
Kensington	92,500 - 107,500	—
Wharf	90,000 - 100,000	50 - 200
Total	380,000 - 440,000	16,700 - 20,250

2025 Costs Applicable to Sales Guidance

	Gold	Silver
	($/oz)	($/oz)
Las Chispas (co-product)	$850 - $950	$9.25 - $10.25
Palmarejo (co-product)	$950 - $1,150	$17.00 - $18.00
Rochester (co-product)	$1,250 - $1,450	$14.50 - $16.50
Kensington	$1,700 - $1,900	—
Wharf (by-product)	$1,250 - $1,350	—

2025 Capital, Exploration and G&A Guidance

															($M)
Capital Expenditures, Sustaining															$132 - $156
Capital Expenditures, Development															$55 - $69
Exploration, Expensed															$67 - $77
Exploration, Capitalized															$10 - $16
General & Administrative Expenses															$44 - $48

Note: The Company’s guidance figures assume estimated prices of $2,700/oz gold and $30.00/oz silver as well as CAD of 1.425 and MXN of 20.50. Guidance figures exclude the impact of any metal sales or foreign exchange hedges.

Results of Operations

Operating Statistics presented below contain tabular information that is presented in both metric and imperial as follows: (i) metric tonnage is utilized for all metals; (ii) gold and silver grades are presented in grams per tonne; and (iii) metal content for gold and silver is presented in ounces. The information that is presented in metric for the periods ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 has been converted from the 2024 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 19, 2025, as this information was previously presented in imperial.

Las Chispas


	Year Ended December 31,
		2025			2024			2023
Tonnes milled		403,011			—			—
Average gold grade (grams/tonne)		4.4			—			—
Average silver grade (grams/tonne)		409			—			—
Average recovery rate – Au		97.1		%	—		%	—		%
Average recovery rate – Ag		97.2		%	—		%	—		%
Gold ounces produced		54,705			—			—
Silver ounces produced		5,145,771			—			—
Gold ounces sold		58,251			—			—
Silver ounces sold		5,445,330			—			—
CAS per gold ounce(1)		$	1,662		$	—		$	—
CAS per silver ounce(1)		$	19.26		$	—		$	—

(1)See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

Year Ended December 31, 2025

Las Chispas’ results represent post-acquisition activity subsequent to the acquisition of SilverCrest on February 14, 2025. The consumption of the remaining acquired stockpile in the third quarter led to production of 54,705 and 5,145,771 gold and silver ounces, respectively. Metal sales were $421.4 million, or 20% of Coeur’s metal sales. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce sold includes $770 and $8.93, respectively, of costs related to the expensing of the $93.5 million of PPA that was ascribed to Inventory. Amortization totaled $94.2 million. Capital expenditures of $38.1 million were composed of underground mine development and capitalized exploration costs.

Palmarejo

	Year Ended December 31,
		2024			2023			2022
		2025			2024			2023
Tons milled		1,762,779			2,008,459			2,197,808
Tonnes milled		1,749,318			1,599,167			1,822,044
Average gold grade (oz/t)		0.07			0.05			0.05
Average gold grade (grams/tonne)		1.9			2.3			1.9
Average silver grade (oz/t)		4.52			3.97			3.63
Average silver grade (grams/tonne)		130			155			136
Average recovery rate – Au		9394.02		%	9193.10		%	9291.1		%
Average recovery rate – Ag		8588.07		%	8285.70		%	8482.27		%
Gold ounces produced		~~108~~100,~~666~~768			~~100~~108,~~605~~666			~~106~~100,~~782~~605
Silver ounces produced		6,~~779~~501,~~659~~308			6,~~591~~779,~~590~~659			6,~~708~~591,~~689~~590
Gold ounces sold		~~108~~100,~~783~~723			99108,~~043~~783			~~107~~99,~~157~~043
Silver ounces sold		6,~~796~~498,~~715~~821			6,~~534~~796,~~469~~715			6,~~695~~534,~~454~~469
CAS per gold ounce(1)		$	~~898~~875		$	~~961~~898		$	~~886~~961
CAS per silver ounce(1)		$	1415.3893		$	1514.1738		$	1315.0917

(1)See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

Year Ended December 31, 2025 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Gold and silver production decreased 7% and 4%, respectively, as a result of a decrease in gold and silver grades,

partially offset by an increase of 9% in mill throughput. Metal sales were $473.8 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $379.1 million, or 36% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $94.7 million, or 25%, of which $123.9 million was due to higher gold and silver prices, partially offset by $29.2 million due to lower volume of gold and silver production. Gold ounces sold associated with the Franco-Nevada Gold Stream Agreement increased to 48% from 34% in the prior year driven by mine sequencing. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 3% and increased 11%, respectively, due to the mix of gold and silver sales which impacted co-product cost allocation, lower consumable (power and cement) and maintenance costs, partially offset by lower production, unfavorable foreign exchange rates and higher outside service costs. Amortization decreased by $8.0 million to $37.0 million due to lower gold and silver ounces sold. Capital expenditures decreased to $25.5 million from $30.6 million due to the lower underground development and equipment purchases.

Year Ended December 31, 2024 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

Gold and silver production increased 8% and 3%, respectively, as a result of a 40% and 14% increase in gold and silver grades, respectively, and higher gold and silver recovery rates, partially offset by a 12% decrease in mill throughput due to mine sequencing. Metal sales were $379.1 million, or 36% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $313.2 million, or 38% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $65.9 million, or 21%, of which $41.5 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices and $24.3 million was the result of higher volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 7% and 5%, respectively, due to higher production, lower labor and cyanide costs, and the favorable impact of foreign exchange rates on operating costs. Amortization increased by $9.3 million to $45.0 million due to a 10% and 4% increase in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively. Capital expenditures decreased to $30.6 million from $41.8 million due to lower underground development expenditures and the completion of the open pit backfill project in 2023.

Year Ended December 31, 2023 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022

Gold and silver production decreased 6% and 2%, respectively, as a result of a 9% decrease in mill throughput partially offset by 4% and 9% higher gold and silver grades, respectively. Metal sales were $313.2 million, or 38% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $303.4 million, or also 38% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $9.8 million, or 3%, of which $26.4 million was due to higher gold and silver prices, partially offset by a decrease of $16.6 million due to a lower volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounces increased 9% and 16%, respectively, due to the mix of gold and silver sales which impacted co-product cost allocation and unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates on employee-related and electricity costs. Amortization increased by $0.3 million to $35.7 million. Capital expenditures decreased to $41.8 million from $42.6 million due to lower capitalized exploration expenditures partially offset by higher open pit backfill project and underground development expenditures.

Rochester

	Year ended December 31,
		2024		2023		2022
		2025		2024		2023
Tons placed(1)		23,529,814		11,388,657		14,919,803
Tonnes placed(1)		30,272,766		21,345,895		10,331,619
Average gold grade (oz/t)		0.002		0.003		0.003
Average gold grade (grams/tonne)		0.08		0.08		0.11
Average silver grade (oz/t)		0.52		0.45		0.41
Average silver grade (grams/tonne)		19.0		17.9		15.6
Gold ounces produced		3960,~~203~~178		3839,~~775~~203		3438,~~735~~775
Silver ounces produced		46,~~377~~131,~~847~~881		34,~~391~~377,~~530~~847		3,~~061~~391,~~924~~530
Gold ounces sold		3860,~~345~~612		38,~~449~~345		3438,~~370~~449
Silver ounces sold		46,~~389~~077,~~378~~114		34,~~339~~389,~~780~~378		3,~~028~~339,~~986~~780
CAS per gold ounce(2)		$	1,~~693~~587	$	21,~~138~~693	$	2,~~403~~138
CAS per silver ounce(2)		$	2018.4358	$	2620.6743	$	~~27.~~26.67

(1) During the year ended December 31, ~~2024~~2025, 2123.51 million and 27.01 million ~~tons~~tonnes of crushed ore and DTP material, respectively, were placed on the new leach pad ~~and legacy leach pad, respectively~~. During the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, 719.35 million and 4.1.9 million ~~tons~~tonnes of ore were placed on the new leach pad and legacy leach ~~pads~~pad, respectively.

(2)See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

Year Ended December 31, 2025 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Gold and silver production increased 54% and 40%, respectively, as a result of the completion of the expansion project in March 2024 and subsequent ramp-up in production rates. Ore tonnes crushed during 2025 consisted of approximately 23.1 million tonnes (25.5 million tons) through the crushing circuit and 7.1 million tonnes (7.8 million tons) of direct-to-pad (“DTP”) material. Ore tonnes placed during 2025 totaled 30.3 million tonnes (33.4 million tons), a 42% (8.9 million tonnes) increase from the prior year. Metal sales were $458.0 million, or 22% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $215.8 million, or 20% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $242.2 million, or 112%, of which $146.1 million was due to a higher volume of gold and silver production, and $96.1 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 6% and 9%, respectively, as a result of the increase in ore tonnes placed, lower electrical power and haul truck repair costs and the mix of gold and silver sales which impacted co-production cost allocation. Amortization increased to $69.3 million due to the increase in gold and silver ounces sold and the full year impact of commissioning of the newly expanded crushing circuit in March 2024. Capital expenditures decreased to $65.8 million from $72.7 million due to Rochester expansion project spending in 2024 offset by equipment purchases and capitalized stripping in 2025 related to the construction of a new open pit.

Year Ended December 31, 2024 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

Gold and silver production increased 1% and 29%, respectively, driven by the increased production from the new leach pad. Metal sales were $215.8 million, or 20% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $156.0 million, or 19% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $59.8 million, or 38%, of which $30.3 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices and $29.5 million was attributable to a higher volume of gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 21% and 23%, respectively, as a result of the increase in tons placed on the new leach pad, lower maintenance costs and LCM adjustments, and the favorable impact of an increase in estimated recoverable ounces on the legacy leach pad in the first quarter of 2024, partially offset by higher labor, electrical and outside service costs. Amortization increased by $14.9 million to $41.3 million due to higher gold and silver ounces sold, and the commencement of production from the new stage 6 leach pad in mid-September 2023 and the three-stage crushing circuit in March 2024. Capital expenditures decreased to $72.7 million from $263.4 million due to reduced spending related to the expansion project.53

~~Commissioning~~Gold and silver production increased 1% and 29%, respectively, driven by the increased production from the new leach pad. Metal sales were $215.8 million, or 20% of ~~Rochester~~Coeur’s ~~new~~metal ~~three-stage~~sales, ~~crushing~~compared ~~circuit~~with ~~and~~$156.0 ~~truck~~million, ~~load-out~~or ~~facility~~19% ~~was~~of ~~completed~~Coeur’s onmetal ~~March~~sales. 7Revenue increased by $59.8 million, ~~2024~~or ~~leading~~38%, of which $30.3 million was due to ~~declaration~~higher ofaverage ~~commercial~~realized ~~production~~gold and silver prices and $~~528~~ 29.5 million was attributable to a higher volume of ~~construction~~gold and silver production. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 21% and 23%, respectively, as a result of the increase in ~~process~~tonnes placed ~~into~~on ~~service~~the new leach pad, lower maintenance costs and LCM adjustments, and the favorable impact of an increase in estimated recoverable ounces on the legacy leach pad in the first quarter of 2024., ~~Ore~~partially ~~tons~~offset ~~placed~~by higher labor, electrical and outside service costs. Amortization increased ~~16%~~by ~~quarter-over-quarter~~$14.9 million to 8$41.23 million ~~tons~~due to higher gold and silver ounces sold, ~~including~~and ~~approximately~~the ~~5.1~~commencement ~~million~~of ~~tons~~production ~~through~~from the new stage 6 leach pad in mid-September 2023 and the three-stage crushing circuit ~~and~~in ~~placed~~March on2024. ~~the~~Capital ~~new~~expenditures ~~leach~~decreased ~~pad~~to $72.7 million from $263.4 million due to reduced spending related to the expansion project.

~~Year~~Commissioning ~~Ended~~of ~~December~~Rochester’s 31new three-stage crushing circuit and truck load-out facility was completed on March 7, ~~2023~~2024 ~~compared~~leading to ~~Year~~declaration ~~Ended~~of ~~December~~commercial 31production and $528 million of construction in process placed into service in the first quarter of 2024. Ore tonnes placed increased 16% quarter-over-quarter to 7.4 million tonnes, ~~2022~~including approximately 4.6 million tonnes through the new crushing circuit and placed on the new leach pad.

Gold and silver production increased 12% and 11%, respectively, as a result of the Rochester expansion and an improved understanding of gold and silver recoveries based on controlling the size fraction and amount of fines placed on the leach pads. Approximately 64% of the tons placed in 2023 were placed onto the new leach pad. The new leach pad along with the new processing facility commenced production in mid-September 2023. Metal sales were $156.0 million, or 19% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared with $129.7 million, or 17% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $26.4 million, or 20%, of which $15.5 million was due to a higher volume of gold and silver production, and $10.9 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices. Costs applicable to sales per gold and silver ounce decreased 11% and 2%, respectively, due to the mix of gold and silver sales and lower LCM adjustments of $39.9 million compared to $46.0 million in the prior year, driven by higher gold and silver prices partially offset by lower tons placed and higher employee-related and maintenance costs. Amortization increased to $26.4 million due to commencement of production of the new leach pad in mid-September 2023. Capital expenditures increased to $263.4 million from $246.4 million due to timing of payments related to the Rochester expansion project.

Kensington

	Year ended December 31,
		2024			2023			2022
		2025			2024			2023
Tons milled		699,037			651,576			700,346
Tonnes milled		692,178			634,156			591,100
Average gold grade (oz/t)		0.15			0.14			0.17
Average gold grade (grams/tonne)		5.2			5.1			4.9
Average recovery rate		9192.30		%	91.93		%	9291.59		%
Gold ounces produced		95106,~~671~~068			8495,~~789~~671			~~109~~84,~~061~~789
Gold ounces sold		95105,~~361~~682			8495,~~671~~361			~~108~~84,~~972~~671
CAS per gold ounce(1)		$	1,~~655~~694		$	1,~~797~~655		$	1,~~423~~797

(1)See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

Year Ended December 31, 2025 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Gold production increased 11% as a result of 9% higher mill throughput and slightly higher grades. Metal sales were $377.7 million, or 18% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $225.1 million, or 21% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $152.6 million, or 68%, of which $115.7 million was due to higher average realized gold prices, and $36.9 million was due to higher volume of gold production. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 2% as higher production was more than offset by higher maintenance, freight, and royalty costs. Amortization increased to $39.3 million primarily due to an increase in gold ounces sold. Capital expenditures decreased to $65.6 million from $68.7 million due to lower underground development and capitalized exploration, partially offset by the construction of the expanded tailings impoundment.

Year Ended December 31, 2024 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

Gold production increased 13% as a result of a 7% increase in grade and higher mill throughput. Metal sales were $225.1 million, or 21% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $162.5 million, or 20% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $62.7 million, or 39%, of which $37.5 million was due to higher average realized gold prices and $25.2 million resulting from a higher volume of gold production. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce decreased 8% due to higher production, and lower labor and diesel costs, partially offset by higher outside service and royalty costs. Amortization increased by $2.3 million to $28.2 million primarily due to an increase in gold ounces sold. Capital expenditures increased to $68.7 million from $53.3 million reflecting continued investment associated with the multi-year underground development and exploration program designed to extend and enhance the mine life, which began in 2022 and is expected to be completed in 2025, as well as underground development and tailings dam expansion expenditures.

~~Year Ended December 31, 2023 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022~~54

Gold production decreased 22% as a result of 18% lower grades and 7% lower mill throughput. Metal sales were $162.5 million, or 20% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $202.5 million, or 26% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue decreased by $40.0 million, or 20%, of which $46.0 million resulted from a lower volume of gold production, partially offset by a $6.0 million increase due to higher average realized gold prices. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 26% due to lower production partially offset by lower operating costs. Amortization decreased to $25.9 million primarily due to a decrease in gold ounces sold and the favorable impact of a longer mine life. Capital expenditures increased to $53.3 million from $31.5 million due to the elevated level of investment associated with the multi-year underground development and exploration program aimed at extending and enhancing the mine life, which began in 2022 and is expected to be completed in 2025.

Wharf

	Year ended December 31,
		2024		2023		2022
		2025		2024		2023
Tons placed		5,003,935		4,743,469		4,506,849
Tonnes placed		3,757,245		4,539,495		4,303,204
Average gold grade (oz/t)		0.031		0.026		0.021
Average gold grade (grams/tonne)		0.9		1.1		0.9
Gold ounces produced		9897,~~042~~327		9398,~~502~~042		7993,~~768~~502
Silver ounces produced		~~232~~135,~~013~~722		~~267~~232,~~786~~013		46267,~~067~~786
Gold ounces sold		9896,~~327~~764		9398,~~348~~327		7993,~~469~~348
Silver ounces sold		~~232~~133,~~728~~970		~~266~~232,~~156~~728		47266,~~284~~156
CAS per gold ounce(1)		$	~~935~~1,155	$	~~1,159~~935	$	1,~~283~~159

(1)See Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures.

50Year Ended December 31, 2025 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Gold production decreased 1% driven by lower grade material placed on the pads and the timing of recoveries. Ore tonnes placed during the fourth quarter were impacted following a fire incident at the tertiary crusher which occurred during regularly scheduled maintenance. The tertiary crusher sustained damage to conveyor belts and electrical system components which will require replacement, but the site is partially mitigating reduced crushing capacity by adding temporary crushing capacity. Detailed engineering for the replacement crusher has been completed and a new tertiary crushing system is planned to be installed and commissioned during the second quarter of 2026. Production is expected to progressively increase throughout the year as permanent crushing capacity is restored. Production is expected to progressively increase throughout the year as permanent crushing capacity is restored. Metal sales were $339.2 million, or 16% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $234.0 million, or 22% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $105.2 million, or 45%, of which $114.4 million was due to higher average realized gold prices, partially offset by $9.2 million due to lower gold production. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce increased 24% due to lower grade ore tonnes placed and higher labor and royalty costs. Amortization decreased to $6.6 million due to the decrease in gold ounces mined. Capital expenditures increased to $17.8 million from $7.2 million as a result of the construction of a water treatment facility, capitalized exploration, and mining equipment purchases.

Year Ended December 31, 2024 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

Gold production increased 5% driven by higher ~~tons~~tonnes placed and grade placed on the pads, and timing of recoveries. Metal sales were $234.0 million, or 22% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $189.5 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $44.5 million, or 23%, of which $33.9 million attributable to higher average realized gold prices and $10.6 million was due to a higher gold production. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce decreased 19% due to higher ~~tons~~tonnes and grade placed on the pads, and lower diesel costs, partially offset by higher royalties, labor and outside service costs. Amortization remained comparable at $6.5 million. Capital expenditures ~~were~~increased to $7.2 million from $2.5 million due to the construction of a water treatment facility.

Year Ended December 31, 2023 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022

Gold production increased 17% driven by higher grade, higher tons placed and timing of recoveries. Metal sales were $189.5 million, or 23% of Coeur’s metal sales, compared to $150.0 million, or 19% of Coeur’s metal sales. Revenue increased by $39.5 million, or 26%, of which $32.5 million was due to a higher gold production, and an increase of $7.0 million due to higher average realized gold prices. Costs applicable to sales per gold ounce decreased 10% due to lower operating costs and higher grade and tons placed. Amortization decreased to $6.7 million due to higher grade and tons placed and the favorable impact of a longer mine life. Capital expenditures were $2.5 million.

Silvertip

Year Ended December 31, 2025 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Exploration expenses total $31.2 million in 2025 compared to $27.3 million in the prior year. Ongoing carrying costs at Silvertip totaled $10.4 million in 2025 and $8.5 million in the prior year. Capital expenditures in 2025 totaled $7.1 million compared to $3.6 million in the prior year.

Year Ended December 31, 2024 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2023

Exploration expense totaled $27.3 million in 2024 as the Company continued to focus on expanding the mineral resources at Silvertip, which were supported by 461 meters of underground mine development. Ongoing carrying costs at Silvertip totaled $8.5 million in 2024 compared to $15.6 million in 2023. Capital expenditures in 2024 totaled $3.6 million.

Year Ended December 31, 2023 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022

Ongoing carrying costs at Silvertip totaled $15.6 million in 2023 and $21.0 million in the prior year. Capital expenditures in 2023 totaled $2.9 million compared to $24.8 million in the prior year due to planned reduction in capital development expenditures.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, ~~2024~~2025, the Company had $56555.97 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and $~~175~~399.75 million available under the RCF. Future borrowing under the RCF may be subject to certain financial covenants. Cash and cash equivalents ~~decreased~~increased $6498.5 million in the year ended December 31, ~~2024~~2025 due to ~~$183.2 million of capital expenditures primarily related to~~ the ~~completion~~cash ofacquired ~~the Rochester expansion project, and the $10.0 million initial payment for the acquisition of mining concessions at Palmarejo. This was partially offset by an 8% and 13% increase~~ in ~~gold and silver ounces sold, respectively, a 18% and 15% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively,~~ the ~~net~~SilverCrest ~~proceeds~~Transaction of $23103.7 million, ~~from~~ the sale of ~~7.7 million~~SilverCrest ~~shares~~acquired ofbullion ~~common stock in the Private Placement Offering (as defined below),~~ and ~~net~~metal ~~draws~~inventory offor $2072.0 million, ~~under~~a ~~the~~24% ~~RCF.~~and 59%

5155

Onincrease ~~February~~in ~~21,~~gold ~~2024, the Company entered into an agreement to extend~~ and ~~enhance~~silver ~~its~~ounces ~~RCF (the “February 2024 Amendment”). The February 2024 Amendment~~sold, ~~among other things~~respectively, (1)includes ~~extends~~$421.4 million ~~the term~~ of ~~the~~post-acquisition ~~RCF~~sales byat ~~approximately~~Las ~~two years so that it now matures in February 2027, (2~~Chispas) ~~increases the RCF by $10 million from $390 million to $400 million~~, ~~(3)~~and ~~adds~~a ~~Fédération~~45% ~~Des Caisses Desjardins Du Québec~~ and ~~National~~43% ~~Bank~~increase ofin ~~Canada~~average asrealized ~~lenders~~gold onand ~~the~~silver ~~RCF~~prices, ~~(4)~~respectively. ~~permits~~This ~~the~~was ~~Company~~partially tooffset ~~obtain~~by ~~one or more increases of the~~ RCF innet anrepayments ~~aggregate amount~~ of ~~up to~~ $~~100~~195.0 million, intransaction ~~incremental~~cost ~~loans~~related ~~and~~payments ~~commitments,~~of ~~subject~~$21.6 ~~to certain conditions~~million, ~~including~~income ~~obtaining~~and ~~commitments~~mining ~~from~~tax ~~relevant~~payments ~~lenders~~of to$178.5 ~~provide~~million, ~~such~~full ~~increase,~~repayment ~~(5)~~of ~~allows~~outstanding ~~for~~prepayment ~~unencumbered~~agreement ~~domestic~~balances ~~cash~~at toRochester, beKensington ~~included~~and inWharf, ~~the~~$221.2 ~~calculation~~million of ~~the~~capital ~~consolidated net leverage ratio~~expenditures, and ~~(6)~~the ~~allows~~second uppayment toof $15 10.0 million ~~of non-capitalized underground mine development costs~~ related to ~~Silvertip to be excluded from~~ the ~~calculation~~acquisition of ~~Consolidated~~mining ~~EBITDA~~concessions ~~for~~at ~~purposes of the RCF~~Palmarejo.

InWe ~~March~~currently ~~2024,~~believe ~~the~~we ~~Company~~have ~~completed~~sufficient ~~the~~sources ~~sale~~ of ~~7,704,725~~funding ~~shares~~to ofmeet ~~its~~our ~~common~~business ~~stock~~requirements ~~(“Private~~for ~~Placement~~the ~~Offering”)~~next ~~issued~~twelve asmonths ~~“flow-through~~and ~~shares”~~longer asterm. ~~defined~~We inexpect ~~subsection~~to ~~66(15)~~use ofcash ~~the~~provided ~~Income~~by ~~Tax~~operating ~~Act~~activities ~~(Canada)~~to ~~(the~~fund ~~“FT~~near ~~Shares”)~~term capital requirements, ~~raising~~including ~~net~~those ~~proceeds~~described ofin ~~approximately~~this ~~$23.7 million,~~Report offor ~~which~~our ~~$0.9 million~~2026 ~~represents~~capital ~~net~~expenditure ~~proceeds~~guidance, ~~received~~and into ~~excess~~repurchase ofshares pursuant to the Company’s ~~average~~$75.0 ~~price~~million ~~(“FT~~share ~~Premium~~repurchase ~~Liability~~program (the “Program”). The ~~proceeds~~acquisition of ~~the~~SilverCrest ~~issuance~~included acquiring a significant amount of FTcash ~~Shares~~and ~~are~~gold and silver bullion, which was used along with our cash provided by ~~the~~operating ~~Company~~activities ~~for~~to ~~certain~~repay ~~qualifying~~all ~~“Canadian~~borrowings ~~Exploration~~under ~~Expenditures”~~the ~~(as~~RCF. ~~such~~Our longer-term isplans ~~defined~~contemplate incontinued exploration to extend the ~~Income~~mine ~~Tax~~lives ~~Act~~at ~~(Canada)),~~our inoperating ~~conducting~~sites, anreduction ~~exploration~~of debt, and ~~mineral~~additional ~~resource~~investment ~~evaluation~~to ~~program~~determine onthe viability of the Silvertip ~~property~~project. inOur ~~British~~long-term ~~Columbia~~target ~~and~~leverage ~~Yukon~~ratio toof ~~determine~~Net Debt to the ~~existence,~~Last ~~location,~~Twelve ~~extent,~~Months ~~and~~Adjusted ~~quality~~EBITDA ofis ~~the~~0.0 ~~silver,~~times ~~lead,~~Adjusted ~~and~~EBITDA. ~~zinc~~Our oncurrent ~~the~~net ~~Silvertip~~leverage ~~property~~ratio is (0.2) times Adjusted EBITDA as of December 31, 2025.

The Company had no outstanding forward contracts at December 31, 2024 following the final settlement in June 2024. The Company has no current plans to implement new hedges but the Company did acquire existing zero cost collar hedges for 1,600 ounces of gold and 200,000 ounces of silver on February 14, 2025 as part of its acquisition of SilverCrest. These zero cost collar hedges settle monthly through March, 2025. The Company may in the future add new hedges as circumstances warrant.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company exchanged $5.9 million in aggregate principal amount of 2029 Senior Notes plus accrued interest for 1.8 million shares of its common stock.

We currently believe we have sufficient sources of funding to meet our business requirements for the next twelve months and longer-term. We expect to use cash provided by operating activities to fund near term capital requirements, including those described in this Report for our 2025 capital expenditure guidance. The acquisition of SilverCrest will include acquiring a significant amount of cash and gold and silver bullion which will be used along with our cash provided by operating activities to begin a period of debt and prepay reduction. Our longer-term plans contemplates continued exploration to extend mine lives at all of our operating sites, the repayment of the RCF, and additional exploration and studies to determine the viability of the Silvertip business case. Our long-term target leverage of Net Debt to the Last Twelve Months Adjusted EBITDA is 0.0 times Adjusted EBITDA. Our current leverage ratio is 1.6 times Adjusted EBITDA as of December 31, 2024.

We also have additional obligations as part of our ordinary course of business, beyond those committed for capital expenditures and other purchase obligations and commitments for purchases of goods and services.

If and to the extent liquidity resources are insufficient to support short- and long-term expenditures, we may need to incur additional indebtedness or issue additional equity securities, among other financing options, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. This could have a material adverse impact on the Company, as discussed in more detail under “Item 1A – Risk Factors”.

Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, ~~2024~~2025 was $~~174~~886.29 million, compared to $67174.32 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024. Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, ~~2024~~2025 was $~~339~~1,025.28 million, compared to $~~142~~339.32 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures”). Net cash provided by operating activities was impacted by the following key factors for the applicable periods:


	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands		2025		2024		2023
Cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities		$	771,557	$	162,359	$	58,827
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(6,688)		(504)		933
Prepaid expenses and other		72,634		2,777		(461)
Inventories		(51,798)		(69,640)		(47,592)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		101,174		79,242		55,581
Cash provided by operating activities		$	886,879	$	174,234	$	67,288

	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands		2024		2023		2022
Cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities		$	162,359	$	58,827	$	71,862
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(504)		933		4,452
Prepaid expenses and other		2,777		(461)		240
Inventories		(69,640)		(47,592)		(51,448)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		79,242		55,581		510
Cash provided by operating activities		$	174,234	$	67,288	$	25,616

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $712.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to a 24% and 59% increase in gold and silver ounces sold (includes $421.4 million of post-acquisition sales at Las Chispas), a 45% and 43% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, the sale of SilverCrest acquired bullion and metal inventory for $72.0 million, lower interest expense, and lower ore placed on leach pads at Wharf. This was partially offset by full repayment of outstanding prepayment agreement balances at Rochester, Kensington and Wharf, higher general and administrative and exploration expenses, income and mining tax payments of $178.5 million compared to $45.1 million in 2024, and timing of VAT collections at Palmarejo and Las Chispas and sales receipts at Kensington. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024 increased by $1,016.1 million, of which $471.1 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices, $123.6 million was due to higher volume of gold and silver sales, and $421.4 million was due to post-acquisition sales at Las Chispas.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $106.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily due to a 8% and 13% increase in gold and silver ounces sold, respectively, a 18% and 15% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, respectively, partially offset by higher ore placed on leach pads at Rochester and Wharf, lower prepaid revenue at Kensington and increased exploration, general and administrative, interest and income and mining tax expense. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 increased by $232.8 million, of which $142.5 million aswas the result of higher average gold and silver prices and $90.3 million was due to higher volume of gold sales.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $41.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to a 4% increase in silver ounces sold and a 5% and 11% increase in average realized gold and silver prices, the receipt of $55.0 million of prepayments at Kensington, Rochester and Wharf in December 2023, and the receipt of $7.8 million FT Premium Liability, partially offset by a 4% decrease in gold ounces sold, higher operating costs, and timing of VAT collections at Palmarejo. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 increased by $35.6 million, of which $53.0 million was due to higher average realized gold and silver prices, partially offset $17.4 million as a result of lower volume of gold sales.56

Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2025 was $127.8 million compared to $193.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. Cash used in investing activities decreased due to the cash acquired in the SilverCrest Transaction of $103.7 million, partially offset by post-acquisition capital expenditures at Las Chispas. The Company incurred capital expenditures of $221.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with $183.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2024 primarily related to post-acquisition underground development, and equipment purchases at Las Chispas, underground development at Palmarejo and Kensington, expanded tailings impoundment at Kensington and the construction of a water treatment facility at Wharf in both periods.

Net cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2024 was $193.5 million compared to $303.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2023. Cash used in investing activities decreased due to lower spending on capital expenditures at Rochester. There were fewer net proceeds on the sale of investments including $39.8 million received from the sale of the Company’s remaining Victoria Gold Common Shares, net proceeds of $7.0 million received from the sale of the La Preciosa Deferred Consideration and $5.0 million received from the sale of the La Preciosa project in 2023 compared to the initial payment of $10.0 million due at closing for the $25.0 million acquisition of mining concessions at Palmarejo in 2024. The Company incurred capital expenditures of $183.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared with $364.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily related to expansion construction and ramp-up activities at Rochester and underground development and exploration at Palmarejo and Kensington in both periods.

Net cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2023 was $303.7 million compared to $146.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2022. The Company incurred capital expenditures of $364.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared with $352.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2022 primarily related to construction activities at Rochester and underground development at Palmarejo and Kensington in both periods. Cash ~~used~~Provided in investing activities increased due to higher capital expenditures, the receipt of net proceeds of $150.2 million and $15.2 million in 2022 from the sale of the Sterling/Crown exploration properties in Nevada and La Preciosa project in Mexico, respectively, partially offset by ~~net~~(Used ~~proceeds of $7.0 million received from the sale of the La Preciosa Deferred Consideration, $5.0 million received from the collection of amounts due under the promissory note issued~~ in) ~~connection~~Financing ~~with~~Activities ~~the sale of the La Preciosa project.~~

~~Cash~~Net ~~Provided~~cash used in financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2025 was $260.6 million compared to net cash provided by ~~Financing~~financing ~~Activities~~activities of $13.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company repaid $195.0 million, net, under the RCF, repurchased $9.6 million of common stock in connection with the Company’s Program, and prepaid $25.6 million in finance leases at Rochester and Kensington. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company received net proceeds of $23.7 million from the sale of 7.7 million shares of its common stock in the Private Placement Offering, and drew $20.0 million, net, from the RCF.

Net cash provided by financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2024 was $13.9 million compared to $236.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company received net proceeds of $23.7 million from the sale of 7.7 million shares of its common stock in the Private Placement Offering, and drew $20.0 million, net, from the RCF. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company drew $95.0 million, net, under the RCF, received aggregate net proceeds of $147.7 million from the sale of 54.6 million shares of its common stock in the March 2023 Equity Offering and September 2023 Equity Offering, and received net proceeds of $20.9 million from the sale of 8.3 million shares of its common stock in the Private Placement Offering.

~~Net~~On ~~cash~~May ~~provided~~27, by2025, ~~financing~~the ~~activities~~Company inannounced the ~~year~~$75.0 million ~~ended~~share ~~December~~repurchase 31program (the “Program”), ~~2023~~effective ~~was~~through ~~$236~~May 31, 2026.1 ~~million~~Under ~~compared~~the Program, repurchases may be carried out from time to ~~$125.0~~time ~~million~~through opportunistic open-market purchases or by other means in ~~the~~amounts ~~year~~and ~~ended~~at ~~December~~prices 31that Coeur deems appropriate, ~~2022.~~subject ~~During~~to ~~the~~market ~~year~~and ~~ended~~business ~~December~~conditions, 31applicable legal requirements and other considerations. On June 11, ~~2023~~2025, the Company ~~drew~~entered ~~$95~~into a 10b-18 share repurchase agreement (the “10b-18 Agreement”) and an issuer securities repurchase 10b5-1 plan (the “Company 10b5-1 Plan”) with BMO Capital Markets Corp.0 ~~million~~as the Company’s broker. On August 8, ~~net~~2025, ~~under~~the Company and BMO Capital Markets Corp. amended the ~~RCF,~~Company ~~received~~10b5-1 ~~aggregate~~Plan ~~net~~to ~~proceeds~~modify certain terms of ~~$147~~the arrangement (the “First Modified Company 10b5-1 Plan”).~~7 million~~ ~~from~~On November 12, 2025, the ~~sale~~Company ofand 54BMO Capital Markets Corp.~~6 million~~ ~~shares~~further ofamended the First Modified Company 10b5-1 Plan (the “Second Modified Company 10b5-1 Plan”). Pursuant to its terms, the Second Modified Company 10b5-1 Plan terminated on December 12, 2025.

53The following table summarizes repurchases made pursuant to the 10b-18 Agreement in the three months and year ended December 31, 2025:

common stock in the March 2023 Equity Offering and September 2023 Equity Offering, and received net proceeds of $20.9 million from the sale of 8.3 million shares of its common stock in the Private Placement Offering. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company drew $15.0 million, net, from the RCF and received net proceeds of $147.4 million from the sale of 36.8 million shares of its common stock in the March Equity Offering and the December Equity Offering.


	Three Months Ended December 31,			Year Ended December 31,
	2025		2024	2025		2024
Shares repurchased	145,929		—	814,129		—
Cost of shares (in thousands)	$	2,287	—	$	9,625	—
Average price paid per share	$	15.67	—	$	11.82	—

Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Developments

Listed below are the accounting policies that we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates and assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue, and expense being reported. For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company produces doré and concentrate that is shipped to third-party refiners and smelters, respectively, for processing. The Company enters into contracts to sell its metal to various third-party customers which may include the refiners and smelters that process the doré and concentrate. The Company’s performance obligation in these transactions is generally the transfer of metal to the customer.

In the case of doré shipments, the Company generally sells refined metal at market prices agreed upon by both parties. The Company also has the right, but not the obligation, to sell a portion of the anticipated refined metal in advance of being fully refined. When the Company sells refined metal or advanced metal, the performance obligation is satisfied when the metal is delivered to the customer. Revenue and Costs Applicable to Sales are recorded on a gross basis under these contracts at the time the performance obligation is satisfied.

Under the Company’s concentrate sales contracts with third-party smelters, metal prices are set on a specified future quotational period, typically one to three months after the shipment date, based on market prices. When the Company sells gold concentrate to the third-party smelters, the performance obligation is satisfied when risk of loss is transferred to the customer. The contracts, in general, provide for provisional payment based upon provisional assays and historical metal prices. Final settlement is based on the applicable price for the specified future quotational period and generally occurs three to six months after shipment. The Company’s provisionally priced sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of concentrates measured at the forward price at the time of sale. The embedded derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting and is adjusted to fair value through revenue each period until the date of final metal settlement.

The Company also sells concentrate under off-take agreements to third-party customers that are responsible for arranging the smelting of the concentrate. Prices can either be fixed or based on a quotational period. The quotational period varies by contract, but is generally a one-month period following the shipment of the concentrate. The performance obligation is satisfied when risk of loss is transferred to the customer.

The Company recognizes revenue from concentrate sales, net of treatment and refining charges, when it satisfies the performance obligation of transferring control of the concentrate to the customer.

For doré and off-take sales, the Company may incur a finance charge related to advance sales that is not considered significant and, as such, is not considered a separate performance obligation. In addition, the Company has elected to treat freight costs as a fulfillment cost under ASC 606 and not as a separate performance obligation.

The Company’s gold stream agreement with Franco-Nevada provided for a $22.0 million deposit paid by Franco-Nevada in exchange for the right and obligation, commencing in 2016, to purchase 50% of a portion of Palmarejo gold production at the lesser of $800 or market price per ounce. Because there is no minimum obligation associated with the deposit, it is not considered financing, and each shipment is considered to be a separate performance obligation. The stream agreement represents a contract liability under ASC 606, which requires the Company to ratably recognize a portion of the deposit as revenue for each gold ounce delivered to Franco-Nevada.

Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of its financial statements, the allocation of fair value to assets and liabilities assumed in connection with business combinations, the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period, and mined reserves. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. There are a number of uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves, including many factors beyond the Company’s control. Mineral reserve estimates are based upon engineering evaluations of samplings of drill holes and other openings. These estimates involve assumptions regarding future silver and gold prices, mine geology, mining methods and the related costs to develop and mine the reserves. Changes in these assumptions could result in material adjustments to the Company’s reserve estimates. The Company uses reserve estimates in determining the units-of-production amortization and evaluating mine assets for potential impairment. For a discussion of estimates and assumptions used by management that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of its financial statements, the reported amounts of revenue

5458

~~estimates involve assumptions regarding future silver~~ and gold prices, mine geology, mining methods and the related costs to develop and mine the reserves. Changes in these assumptions could result in material adjustments to the Company’s reserve estimates. The Company uses reserve estimates in determining the units-of-production amortization and evaluating mine assets for potential impairment. For a discussion of estimates and assumptions used by management that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of its financial statements, the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period, and mined reserves, see Note 2 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Amortization

The Company amortizes its property, plant, and equipment, mining properties, and mine development using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body generally based on its proven and probable reserves or the straight-line method over the useful life, whichever is shorter. The accounting estimates related to amortization are critical accounting estimates because (1) the determination of reserves involves uncertainties with respect to the ultimate geology of its reserves and the assumptions used in determining the economic feasibility of mining those reserves and (2) changes in estimated proven and probable reserves and asset useful lives can have a material impact on net income.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

We review and evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Asset impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated undiscounted pretax future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups. An impairment loss is measured by discounted estimated future cash flows, and recorded by reducing the asset's carrying amount to fair value. Future cash flows are estimated based on estimated quantities of recoverable minerals, expected gold and silver prices (considering current and historical prices, trends and related factors), production levels, operating costs, capital requirements and reclamation costs, all based on life-of-mine plans.

Existing proven and probable reserves and value beyond proven and probable reserves, including mineralization other than proven and probable reserves, are included when determining the fair value of mine site asset groups at acquisition and, subsequently, in determining whether the assets are impaired. The term “recoverable minerals” refers to the estimated amount of gold and silver that will be obtained after taking into account losses during ore processing and treatment. Estimates of recoverable minerals from exploration stage mineral interests are risk adjusted based on management’s relative confidence in such materials. The ability to achieve the estimated quantities of recoverable minerals from exploration stage mineral interests involves further risks in addition to those risk factors applicable to mineral interests where proven and probable reserves have been identified, due to the lower level of confidence that the identified mineral reserves and resources could ultimately be mined economically. Assets classified as exploration potential have the highest level of risk that the carrying value of the asset can be ultimately realized, due to the still lower level of geological confidence and economic modeling.

Gold and silver prices are volatile and affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including prevailing interest rates and returns on other asset classes, expectations regarding inflation, speculation, currency values, governmental decisions regarding precious metals stockpiles, global and regional demand and production, political and economic conditions and other factors that may affect the key assumptions used in the Company’s impairment testing. Various factors could impact our ability to achieve forecasted production levels from proven and probable reserves. Additionally, production, capital and reclamation costs could differ from the assumptions used in the cash flow models used to assess impairment. Actual results may vary from the Company’s estimates and result in additional Impairment of Long-lived Assets.

Ore on Leach Pads

The heap leach process extracts silver and gold by placing ore on an impermeable pad and applying a diluted cyanide solution that dissolves a portion of the contained silver and gold, which are then recovered in metallurgical processes.

The Company uses several integrated steps to scientifically measure the metal content of ore placed on the leach pads. As the ore body is drilled in preparation for the blasting process, samples are taken of the drill residue which are assayed to determine estimated quantities of contained metal. The Company then processes the ore through crushing facilities where the output is again weighed and sampled for assaying. A metallurgical reconciliation with the data collected from the mining operation is completed with appropriate adjustments made to previous estimates. The crushed ore is then transported to the leach pad for application of the leaching solution. As the leach solution is collected from the leach pads, it is continuously sampled for assaying. The quantity of leach solution is measured by flow meters throughout the leaching and precipitation process. After precipitation, the product is converted to doré at the Rochester mine and a form of gold electrolytic cathodic sludge at the Wharf mine, representing the final product produced by each mine. The inventory is stated at lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost being determined using a weighted average cost method.

The historical cost of metal expected to be extracted within 12 months is classified as current and the historical cost of metals contained within the broken ore expected to be extracted beyond 12 months is classified as non-current. Ore on leach pads is valued based on actual production costs incurred to produce and place ore on the leach pad, less costs allocated to minerals recovered through the leach process.

The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time and the quantity of metal that may be extracted relative to the time the leach process occurs requires the use of estimates, which are inherently inaccurate due to the nature of the leaching process. The quantities of metal contained in the ore are based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach process extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory testing and actual experience of more than 20 years of leach pad operations at the Rochester mine and 30 years of leach pad operations at the Wharf mine. The assumptions used by the Company to measure metal content during each stage of the inventory conversion process includes estimated recovery rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. The Company periodically reviews its estimates compared to actual experience and revises its estimates when appropriate. The ultimate recovery will not be known until leaching operations cease. Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis. In the first quarter of 2024, the Company completed a review of the estimated recoverable ounces of gold and silver on its leach pads and determined that as a result of longer expected leach time and favorable recoveries relative to previous estimates, that the estimated recoverable gold and silver on the Rochester legacy leach pads (Stages 2, 3 and 4) supported an upward revision. An additional 6,000 ounces of gold and 900,000 ounces of silver were added to the legacy leach pads in the first quarter of 2024. There are five reusable heap leach pads (load/offload) used at Wharf. Each pad goes through an approximate 24-month process of loading of ore, leaching and offloading which includes a neutralization and denitrification process. During the leaching cycle of each pad, revised estimated recoverable ounces for each of the pads may result in an upward or downward revision from time to time, which generally have not been significant. The updated recoverable ounce estimate is considered a change in estimate and was accounted for prospectively. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s combined estimated recoverable ounces of gold and silver on the leach pads were 49,575 and 6.9 million, respectively.59

The estimate of both the ultimate recovery expected over time and the quantity of metal that may be extracted relative to the time the leach process occurs requires the use of estimates, which are inherently inaccurate due to the nature of the leaching process. The quantities of metal contained in the ore are based upon actual weights and assay analysis. The rate at which the leach process extracts gold and silver from the crushed ore is based upon laboratory testing and actual experience of more than 20 years of leach pad operations at the Rochester mine and 30 years of leach pad operations at the Wharf mine. The assumptions used by the Company to measure metal content during each stage of the inventory conversion process includes estimated recovery rates based on laboratory testing and assaying. The Company periodically reviews its estimates compared to actual experience and revises its estimates when appropriate. The ultimate recovery will not be known until leaching operations cease. Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis. There are five reusable heap leach pads (load/offload) used at Wharf. Each pad goes through an approximate 24-month process of loading of ore, leaching and offloading which includes a neutralization and denitrification process. During the leaching cycle of each pad, revised estimated recoverable ounces for each of the pads may result in an upward or downward revision from time to time, which generally have not been significant. Updated recoverable ounce estimates are considered a change in estimate and are accounted for prospectively. As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s combined estimated recoverable ounces of gold and silver on the leach pads were 64,482 and 8.9 million, respectively.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired in a business acquisition. Goodwill is allocated to reporting units and tested for impairment annually as of December 31 and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The Las Chispas mine is considered a distinct reporting unit for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. Based on the December 31, 2025 review, the Company concluded that Goodwill was not impaired.

The Company may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value exceeds the carrying value. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, a quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair value of a reporting unit is determined using either the income approach utilizing estimates of discounted future cash flows or the market approach utilizing recent transaction activity for comparable properties. These approaches are considered Level 3 fair value measurements. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

When the income approach is utilized to determine fair value, the estimated cash flows used to assess the fair value of a reporting unit are derived from the Company’s current business plans, which are developed using short-term price forecasts reflective of the current price environment and management’s projections for long-term average metal prices. In addition to short- and long-term metal price assumptions, other assumptions include estimates of operating costs; proven and probable mineral reserves estimates, including the timing and cost to develop and produce the reserves; value beyond proven and probable estimates; estimated future closure costs; the use of appropriate discount rates; and applicable U.S. dollar long-term exchange rates. See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions and factors. For testing purposes of our reporting units, management's best estimates of the expected future results are the primary driver in determining the fair value. However, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the goodwill impairment tests will prove to be an accurate prediction of the future. Examples of events or circumstances that could reasonably be expected to negatively affect the underlying key assumptions and ultimately impact the estimated fair value of our reporting units include, but are not limited to, such items as: (i) a decrease in forecasted production levels if we are unable to realize the mineable reserves, resources and exploration potential at our mining properties and extend the life of mine (ii) increased production or capital costs (iii) adverse changes in macroeconomic conditions including the market price of metals and changes in the equity and debt markets or country-specific factors which could result in higher discount rates, (iv) significant unfavorable changes in tax rates including increased corporate income or mining tax rates, and (v) negative changes in regulation, legislation, and political environments which could impact our ability to operate in the future. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding goodwill.

Reclamation

The Company recognizes obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation will be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. An accretion cost, representing the increase over time in the present value of the liability, is recorded each period in Pre-development, Reclamation, and Other. As reclamation work is performed or liabilities are otherwise settled, the recorded amount of the liability is reduced. Future remediation costs for inactive mines are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the discounted costs expected to be incurred at the site. Such cost estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care and maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates are reflected in earnings in the period an estimate is revised. See Note 9 -- Reclamation in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

As reclamation work is performed or liabilities are otherwise settled, the recorded amount of the liability is reduced. Future remediation costs for inactive mines are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the discounted costs expected to be incurred at the site. Such cost estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care and maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates are reflected in earnings in the period an estimate is revised. See Note 10 -- Reclamation in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Derivatives

The Company is exposed to various market risks, including the effect of changes in metal prices and interest rates, and uses derivatives to manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. The Company may elect to designate certain derivatives as hedging instruments under U.S. GAAP.

The Company, from time to time, uses derivative contracts to protect the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in metal prices. The Company has elected to designate these instruments as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions at their inception. Assuming normal market conditions, the change in the market value of such derivative contracts has historically been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in price movements of the hedged item. The effective portions of cash flow hedges are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Deferred gains and losses associated with cash flow hedges of revenue from metal sales are recognized as a component of Revenue in the same period as the related sale is recognized. Deferred gains and losses associated with cash flow hedges of foreign currency transactions are recognized as a component of Costs applicable to sales or Predevelopment, reclamation and other in the same period the related expenses are incurred.

For derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, the Company recognizes derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value. Changes in the value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are recorded each period in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) in Fair value adjustments, net or Revenue. Management applies judgment in estimating the fair value of instruments that are highly sensitive to assumptions regarding commodity prices, market volatilities, and foreign currency exchange rates. See Note 1314 -- Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities for additional information.

Income and Mining Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the guidance of ASC 740. The Company’s annual tax rate

is based on income, statutory tax rates in effect and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Significant judgment is required in determining the annual tax expense, current tax assets and liabilities, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and our future taxable income, both as a whole and in various tax jurisdictions, for purposes of assessing our ability to realize future benefit from our deferred tax assets. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law, significant changes in the jurisdictions in which we operate or unpredicted results from the final determination of each year’s liability by taxing authorities.

The Company’s deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts measured by tax laws and regulations. In evaluating the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management considers both positive and negative evidence that may exist, such as earnings history, reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings and available tax planning strategies in each tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance may be established to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is considered more likely than not to be realized through the generation of future taxable income and other tax planning strategies.

The Company has asserted a partial indefinite reinvestment of earnings from its Mexican operations as determined by management’s judgment about and intentions concerning the future operations of the Company. The Company does not record a U.S. deferred tax liability for foreign earnings that meet the indefinite reversal criteria. ~~Refer~~See to Note 1011 -- Income and Mining Taxes for further discussion on our assertion.

The Company’s operations may involve dealing with uncertainties and judgments in the application of complex tax regulations in multiple jurisdictions. The final taxes paid are dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state, and international tax audits. The Company recognizes potential liabilities and records tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on its estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. The Company adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit; however, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution could result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period which they are determined. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Other Liquidity Matters

We believe that our liquidity and capital resources in the U.S. are adequate to fund our U.S. operations and corporate activities. The Company has asserted a partial indefinite reinvestment of earnings from its Mexican operations as determined by management’s judgment about, and intentions concerning, the future operations of the Company. The Company does not believe that the amounts reinvested will have a material impact on liquidity.

In order to reduce indebtedness, fund future cash interest payments and/or amounts due at maturity or upon redemption and for general working capital purposes, from time- to- time we may (1) issue equity securities for cash in public or private offerings or (2) repurchase certain of our debt securities for cash or in exchange for other securities, which may include secured or unsecured notes or equity, in each case in open market or privately negotiated transactions. We evaluate any such transactions in light of prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors. The amounts involved may be significant and any debt repurchase transactions may occur at a substantial discount to the debt securities’ face amount.

Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Unless otherwise noted, we present the Non-GAAP financial measures in the tables below. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for performance measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

57Adjusted Net Income

Management uses Adjusted net income to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, and to plan and forecast its operations. The Company believes the use of Adjusted net income reflects the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining companies. Management’s determination of the components of Adjusted net income is evaluated periodically and is based, in part, on a review of non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts. The tax effect of adjustments are based on statutory tax rates and the Company’s tax attributes, including the impact through the Company’s valuation allowance. The combined effective rate of tax adjustments may not be consistent with the statutory tax rates or the Company’s effective tax rate due to jurisdictional tax attributes and related valuation allowance impacts which may minimize the tax effect of certain adjustments and may not apply to gains and losses equally. Adjusted net income is reconciled to Net ~~Income~~income ~~(Loss)~~in the following table:

Management uses Adjusted net income (loss) to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, and to plan and forecast its operations. The Company believes the use of Adjusted net income (loss) reflects the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining companies. Management’s determination of the components of Adjusted net income (loss) is evaluated periodically and is based, in part, on a review of non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts. The tax effect of adjustments are based on statutory tax rates and the Company’s tax attributes, including the impact through the Company’s valuation allowance. The combined effective rate of tax adjustments may not be consistent with the statutory tax rates or the Company’s effective tax rate due to jurisdictional tax attributes and related valuation allowance impacts which may minimize the tax effect of certain adjustments and may not apply to gains and losses equally. Adjusted net income (loss) is reconciled to Net income (loss) in the following table:


	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands except per share amounts		2025		2024		2023
Net income (loss)		$	585,872	$	58,900	$	(103,612)
Fair value adjustments, net		342		—		(3,384)
Foreign exchange loss (gain)(1)		42,040		(4,448)		1,994
Loss on sale of assets		698		4,250		25,197
RMC bankruptcy distribution		(37)		(1,294)		(1,516)

(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment		113		(417)		(3,437)
Transaction costs		26,409		8,517		—
Kensington royalty settlement		(66)		7,369		469
Wage and Hour Litigation settlement		7,059		—		—
Mexico arbitration matter		2,950		3,612		2,803
Flow-through share premium		(808)		(5,563)		(2,284)
Interest income		—		—		(187)
Legacy crusher non-operating costs		—		—		4,013
COVID-19		—		11		111


Valuation allowance and tax effect of adjustments(2)		(171,211)		(820)		1,785
Adjusted net income (loss)		$	493,361	$	70,117	$	(78,048)

Adjusted net income (loss) per share, Basic		$	0.81	$	0.18	$	(0.23)
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, Diluted		$	0.80	$	0.18	$	(0.23)

	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands except per share amounts		2024		2023		2022
Net income (loss)		$	58,900	$	(103,612)	$	(78,107)
Fair value adjustments, net		—		(3,384)		66,668
Foreign exchange loss (gain)		(4,448)		1,994		1,648
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and securities		4,250		25,197		(64,429)
RMC bankruptcy distribution		(1,294)		(1,516)		(1,651)
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment		(417)		(3,437)		—
Transaction costs		8,517		—		—
Other adjustments		5,429		4,925		2,161
Tax effect of adjustments(1)		(820)		1,785		(15,349)
Adjusted net income (loss)		$	70,117	$	(78,048)	$	(89,059)
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, Basic		$	0.18	$	(0.23)	$	(0.32)
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, Diluted		$	0.18	$	(0.23)	$	(0.32)

(1) ~~For~~Includes the ~~year~~impact ~~ended~~of ~~December~~foreign ~~31,~~exchange ~~2024,~~rates on deferred tax ~~effect~~balances of ~~adjustments~~$43.5 ofmillion, $(0.8)3 million (-and $1.5%) ~~are~~million ~~primarily~~for ~~related~~the toyears ~~the~~ended ~~RMC~~December ~~bankruptcy~~31, ~~distribution~~2025, 2024 and 2023.

(2) For the year ended December 31, 2025, tax effect of adjustments of $171.2 million (-467%) are primarily related to the release of the valuation allowance against U.S. net deferred tax assets of $162.0million, the wage and hour litigation settlement, and transaction costs at Corporate. For the year ended December 31, 2024, tax effect of adjustments of $(0.8) million (-5%) are primarily related to the RMC bankruptcy distribution, and nonrecurring expenses at Palmarejo. For the year ended December 31, 2023, tax effect of adjustments of $1.8 million (8%) is primarily related to the loss on the sale of the La Preciosa Deferred Consideration.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, tax effect of adjustments of $1.8 million (8%) is primarily related to the loss on the sale of the La Preciosa Deferred Consideration.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, tax effect of adjustments of $(15.3) million (-558%) is primarily related to the to the fair value adjustments on the

Company’s equity investments and the derecognition of deferred tax liabilities related to the sale of La Preciosa and the Sterling/Crown exploration properties.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

Management uses EBITDA to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, to plan and forecast its operations, and assess leverage levels and liquidity measures. The Company believes the use of EBITDA reflects the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and allows investors and analysts to compare results of the Company to similar results of other mining companies. Adjusted EBITDA is the basis of a measure used in the indenture governing the 2029 Senior Notes and the RCF to determine our ability to make certain payments and incur additional indebtedness. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered an alternative to, Net income (Loss) or Cash Flow from Operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently and those calculations may not be comparable to our presentation. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to Net income (loss) in the following table:


	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands		2025		2024		2023
Net income		$	585,872	$	58,900	$	(103,612)

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest		30,942		51,276		29,099
Income tax provision		96,666		67,450		35,156
Amortization		251,099		124,974		99,822
EBITDA		964,579		302,600		60,465
Fair value adjustments, net		342		—		(3,384)
Foreign exchange (gain) loss		(1,429)		(4,753)		459
Asset retirement obligation accretion		19,697		16,778		16,405
Inventory adjustments and write-downs		6,265		8,042		43,188
Loss on sale of assets		698		4,250		25,197
RMC bankruptcy distribution		(37)		(1,294)		(1,516)

(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment		113		(417)		(3,437)
Kensington royalty settlement		(66)		7,369		469
Wage and Hour Litigation settlement		7,059		—		—
Mexico arbitration matter		2,950		3,612		2,803
Flow-through share premium		(808)		(5,563)		(2,284)
Interest income		—		—		(187)
Legacy crusher disposal		—		—		4,013
COVID-19		—		11		111
Transaction costs		26,409		8,517		—


Adjusted EBITDA		1,025,772		339,152		142,302

	Year Ended December 31,
In thousands		2024		2023		2022
Net income (loss)		$	58,900	$	(103,612)	$	(78,107)
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest		51,276		29,099		23,861
Income tax provision (benefit)		67,450		35,156		14,658
Amortization		124,974		99,822		111,626
EBITDA		302,600		60,465		72,038
Fair value adjustments, net		—		(3,384)		66,668
Foreign exchange (gain) loss		(4,753)		459		850
Asset retirement obligation accretion		16,778		16,405		14,232
Inventory adjustments and write-downs		8,042		43,188		49,085
(Gain) loss on sale of assets and securities		4,250		25,197		(64,429)
RMC bankruptcy distribution		(1,294)		(1,516)		(1,651)
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment		(417)		(3,437)		—
Transaction costs		8,517		—		—
Other adjustments		5,429		4,925		2,161
Adjusted EBITDA		$	339,152	$	142,302	$	138,954

Free Cash Flow

Management uses Free Cash Flow as a non-GAAP measure to analyze cash flows generated from operations. Free Cash Flow is Cash Provided By (used in) Operating Activities less Capital expenditures as presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company believes Free Cash Flow is also useful as one of the bases for comparing the Company’s performance with its competitors. Although Free Cash Flow and similar measures are frequently used as measures of cash flows generated from operations by other companies, the Company’s calculation of Free Cash Flow is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure, to Cash Provided By (used in) Operating Activities, which the Company believes to be the GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to Free Cash Flow.

Consolidated	Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)		2024		2023		2022
Cash flow from operations		$	174,234	$	67,288	$	25,616
Capital expenditures		183,188		364,617		352,354
Free cash flow		$	(8,954)	$	(297,329)	$	(326,738)


Consolidated	Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)		2025		2024		2023
Cash flow from operations		$	886,879	$	174,234	$	67,288
Capital expenditures		221,162		183,188		364,617
Free cash flow		$	665,717	$	(8,954)	$	(297,329)

Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital

Management uses Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital as a non-GAAP measure to analyze cash flows generated from operations. Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital is Cash Provided By (used in) Operating Activities excluding the change in Receivables, Prepaid expenses and other, Inventories and Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company believes Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital is also useful as one of the bases for comparing the Company’s performance with its competitors. Although Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital and similar measures are frequently used as measures of cash flows generated from operations by other companies, the Company’s calculation of Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital, a non-GAAP financial measure, to Cash Provided By (used in) Operating Activities, which the Company believes to be the GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to Operating Cash Flow Before Changes in Working Capital.


	Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)		2025		2024		2023
Cash provided by operating activities		$	886,879	$	174,234	$	67,288
Changes in op

Filing Compare · Coeur Mining, Inc.