iveUnited States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________to _________

Commission file number 0-14533

OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	52-1322906
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]

Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [ ]

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [X] No

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except unit data)

	June 30,	December 31,
	2010	2009
	(Unaudited)	(Note)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 118	$ 220
Receivables and deposits	135	98
Other assets	66	72
Investment property:
Land	1,251	1,251
Buildings and related personal property	19,845	19,774
	21,096	21,025
Less accumulated depreciation	(14,197)	(13,732)
	6,899	7,293
	$ 7,218	$ 7,683
Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 35	$ 38
Tenant security deposit liabilities	41	38
Accrued property taxes	245	148
Other liabilities (Note B)	154	220
Mortgage note payable	10,200	10,200
	10,675	10,644

Partners' (Deficiency) Capital
General partners	(2,268)	(2,215)
Assignor limited partner	1	1
Assignee unit holders (23,558 units outstanding)	(1,190)	(747)
	(3,457)	(2,961)
	$ 7,218	$ 7,683

Note: The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per unit data)

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2010	2009	2010	2009
Revenues:
Rental income	$ 689	$ 725	$ 1,379	$ 1,432
Other income	57	62	119	120
Total revenues	746	787	1,498	1,552

Expenses:
Operating	303	269	597	571
General and administrative	33	37	49	69
Depreciation	245	242	489	483
Interest	37	42	73	87
Property taxes	117	124	274	241
Total expenses	735	714	1,482	1,451

Casualty gain (Note C)	--	--	24	--
Net income	$ 11	$ 73	$ 40	$ 101


Net income allocated to general
partners (2%)	$ --	$ 1	$ 1	$ 2
Net income allocated to assignee
unit holders (98%)	11	72	39	99
	$ 11	$ 73	$ 40	$ 101

Net income per Assignee Unit	$ 0.47	$ 3.06	$ 1.66	$ 4.20

Distributions per Assignee Unit	$ 13.37	$ 10.61	$ 20.46	$148.31

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF Changes in PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except unit data)

	Assignee	General	Assignor	Assignee
	Units	Partners	Limited	Unit	Total
			Partner	Holders
Partners' (deficiency)
capital at December 31, 2009	23,558	$(2,215)	$ 1	$ (747)	$(2,961)

Distributions to partners	--	(54)	--	(482)	(536)

Net income for the six
months ended June 30, 2010	--	1	--	39	40

Partners' (deficiency)
capital at June 30, 2010	23,558	$(2,268)	$ 1	$(1,190)	$(3,457)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2010	2009

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$ 40	$ 101
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	489	483
Amortization of loan costs	20	25
Casualty gain	(24)	--
Bad debt expense	34	16
Change in accounts:
Other assets	(14)	(35)
Receivables and deposits	(71)	69
Accounts payable	(17)	22
Accrued property taxes	97	230
Tenant security deposit liabilities	3	1
Other liabilities	(66)	(19)
Net cash provided by operating activities	491	893

Cash flows from investing activities:
Property improvements and replacements	(94)	(84)
Insurance proceeds received	37	--
Net cash used in investing activities	(57)	(84)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to partners	(536)	(3,644)
Loan costs refunded	--	11
Net cash used in financing activities	(536)	(3,633)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(102)	(2,824)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	220	3,071
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 118	$ 247

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$ 53	$ 53

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
Property improvements and replacements included in
accounts payable	$ 14	$ 15

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note A – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership (the "Partnership" or "ORP") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of Oxford Residential Properties I Corporation (the "Managing General Partner"), all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The Managing General Partner is an affiliate of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.

The Partnership’s management evaluated subsequent events through the time this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was filed.

Note B – Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for payments to affiliates for property management services and for reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's property as compensation for providing property management services. However, 40% of this fee is subordinated until certain operating distribution preference levels to the Assignee Unit Holders are achieved or the Partnership distributes proceeds from a sale or refinancing. During 2009, the operating distribution preference level was met. Total property management fees of approximately $75,000 and $78,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are included in operating expense. Property management fees of approximately $31,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were deferred. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Partnership paid approximately $36,000 of deferred management fees from operations. As of December 31, 2009, approximately $5,000 of property management fees were owed and are included in other liabilities. There were no property management fees due at June 30, 2010.

An affiliate of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $24,000 and $21,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $7,000 and $4,000, respectively. At June 30, 2010, approximately $4,000 of reimbursements were due to the Managing General Partner and are included in other liabilities. There were no such reimbursements due at December 31, 2009.

The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $32,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by the Partnership during 2010 as other insurance policies renew later in the year. The Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $45,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Note C - Casualty Event

In May 2009, Fairlane East Apartments sustained damages of approximately $47,000 as a result of a fire. The Partnership recognized a casualty gain of approximately $24,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 as a result of the receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $37,000, net of the write-off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $13,000. The Partnership does not expect to receive any additional insurance proceeds related to this casualty.

Note D – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value is defined as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership believes that the carrying amount of its financial instruments approximates their fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments, which includes the mortgage encumbering Fairlane East Apartments.

Note E – Contingencies

As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the Managing General Partner, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective action in August 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in excess of 40 hours per week (“overtime claims”). The plaintiffs also contended that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company (“the Defendants”) failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call" (“on-call claims”). In March 2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the collective action. In July 2007, plaintiffs’ counsel filed individual cases in Federal court in 22 jurisdictions. In the second quarter of 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P. settled the overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a framework for resolving the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal courts have been dismissed. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the partnership paid approximately $13,000 for settlement amounts for alleged unpaid overtime to employees who had worked at the Partnership’s investment property. At this time, the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel are not resolved. Pursuant to the global settlement agreement, the parties selected six test “on-call” cases to be arbitrated. The parties arbitrated four “on-call” claims and obtained defense verdicts on all four. Two additional “on-call” claims were dismissed with prejudice. The process now calls for the parties to attempt to mediate the remaining “on-call” claims and plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees. Such mediation has not yet been scheduled. The Managing General Partner is uncertain as to the amount of any additional loss that may be allocable to the Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership cannot estimate whether any additional loss will occur or a potential range of loss.

The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Environmental

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its property, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its property.

Mold

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the Managing General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents. To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Note F - Subsequent Event

The mortgage indebtedness encumbering Fairlane East Apartments of approximately $10,200,000 was refinanced during 2008 under and secured real estate credit facility (“Secured Credit Facility”), which has a maturity of October 1, 2010. On July 31, 2010, AIMCO Properties, L.P. exercised its option to extend the maturity date of the Secured Credit Facility to October 1, 2011. In addition, AIMCO Properties, L.P. paid an extension fee of approximately $86,000, approximately $19,000 of which was allocated to the Partnership. If the Partnership repays the mortgage loan encumbering Fairlane East Apartments prior to October 1, 2010, the extension fee of $19,000 will be refunded to the Partnership.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Quarterly Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including, without limitation, statements regarding the effect of redevelopments, the Partnership’s future financial performance, including the Partnership’s ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy and rent levels, and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors some of which are beyond the Partnership’s control including, without limitation: financing risks, including the availability and cost of financing and the risk that the Partnership’s cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; natural disasters and severe weather such as hurricanes; national and local economic conditions; the general level of interest rates; energy costs; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Partnership’s property and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for residents in such markets; insurance risk, including the cost of insurance; development risks; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by the Partnership. Readers should carefully review the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the other documents the Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's investment property consists of one apartment complex. The following table sets forth the average occupancy of the property for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Average Occupancy
Property	2010	2009

Fairlane East Apartments (1)	97%	93%
Dearborn, Michigan

(1) The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at Fairlane East Apartments to competitive pricing and an improvement in local economic conditions.

The Partnership’s financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment property, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the Managing General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions; accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnership’s financial results.

Results of Operations

The Partnership’s net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was approximately $11,000 and $40,000, compared to net income of approximately $73,000 and $101,000, respectively, for the corresponding periods in 2009. Net income decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2010 due to a decrease in total revenues and an increase in total expenses. Net income decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to a decrease in total revenues and an increase in total expenses, partially offset by the recognition of a casualty gain in 2010.

Total revenues decreased for both periods due to a decrease in rental income. Other income remained relatively constant for both periods. Rental income decreased for both periods due to a decrease in the average rental rate and an increase in bad debt expense, partially offset by an increase in occupancy at Fairlane East Apartments.

Total expenses increased for the three months ended June 30, 2010 due to an increase in operating expenses, partially offset by decreases in interest and property tax expenses. General and administrative expenses remained relatively constant for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Total expenses increased for the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to increases in operating and property tax expenses, partially offset by decreases in interest and general and administrative expenses. Depreciation expense remained relatively constant for both periods. Operating expense increased for both periods primarily due to increases in contract maintenance expense at Fairlane East Apartments and the Michigan business tax, which is charged based on the property’s operations. Interest expense decreased for both periods primarily due to a decrease in the variable interest rate on the mortgage encumbering Fairlane East Apartments. Property tax expense decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as the final 2009 tax bill was received and was lower than estimated. Property tax expense increased for the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to an increase in the assessed value of the property.

General and administrative expenses decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to a decrease in costs associated with the Partnership’s tax return. Also included in general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are management reimbursements charged by the Managing General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement, costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2010, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $118,000, compared to approximately $220,000 at December 31, 2009. Cash and cash equivalents decreased approximately $102,000 due to approximately $536,000 and $57,000 of cash used in financing and investing activities, respectively, partially offset by approximately $491,000 of cash provided by operating activities. Cash used in financing activities consisted of distributions to partners. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements, partially offset by insurance proceeds received.

The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. Capital improvements planned for the Partnership's property are detailed below.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Partnership completed approximately $108,000 of capital improvements at Fairlane East Apartments, consisting primarily of floor covering replacement and construction related to the casualty discussed above. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow and insurance proceeds. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2010. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from Partnership reserves. To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership's assets are thought to be sufficient for any near term needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering Fairlane East Apartments of approximately $10,200,000 was refinanced during 2008 under a secured real estate credit facility (“Secured Credit Facility”) with AEGON USA Realty Advisors, Inc., as agent for Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company. The Secured Credit Facility had an original maturity date of October 1, 2010. AIMCO Properties, L.P. had the option to extend the Secured Credit Facility by two one-year extensions if no event of default existed under the Secured Credit Facility. On July 31, 2010, AIMCO Properties, L.P. exercised its option to extend the maturity date of the Secured Credit Facility to October 1, 2011. The mortgage requires monthly payments of interest only through the October 1, 2011 maturity date, at which date the entire principal balance of approximately $10,200,000 is due. The loan has a variable interest rate of the one-month LIBOR rate plus 0.78% (1.13% per annum at June 30, 2010) and resets monthly. The variable interest rate may increase to the one-month LIBOR rate plus 0.98% if the debt service coverage ratio of the investment property decreases below a prescribed threshold. The Secured Credit Facility provides mortgage loans on properties owned by other partnerships that are affiliated with the Managing General Partner. The Secured Credit Facility creates separate loans for each property that are not cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted with the other property loans. The loans are prepayable without penalty. The Managing General Partner is currently working to refinance the Partnership’s mortgage indebtedness. If the property cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the Partnership will risk losing such property through foreclosure.

The Partnership distributed the following amounts during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except per unit data):

	Six Months Ended	Per Assignee	Six Months Ended	Per Assignee
	June 30, 2010	Unit	June 30, 2009	Unit
Operations	$ 536	$ 20.46	$ 1,350	$ 50.94
Sale (1)	--	--	2,252	95.59
Refinance (2)	--	--	42	1.78
	$ 536	$ 20.46	$ 3,644	$ 148.31

(1) Proceeds from the September 2008 sale of Raven Hill Apartments.

(2) Proceeds from the June 2008 refinancing of the mortgage encumbering Raven Hill Apartments.

Subsequent to June 30, 2010, the Partnership distributed approximately $170,000 to the partners (approximately $153,000 to the limited partners or $6.49 per Assignee Unit) from operations. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated from operations, the timing of the debt maturity, refinancing and/or property sale. The Partnership’s cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. There can be no assurance, however, that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital improvement expenditures, to permit any additional distributions to its partners in 2010 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 14,153.5 Assignee units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 60.08% of the outstanding Units at June 30, 2010. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Unit holders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters which would include voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 60.08% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO is in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Asset

Investment property is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnership’s estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk. Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnership’s investment property. These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing; and changes in interest rates and the availability of financing. Any adverse changes in these and other factors could cause an impairment of the Partnership’s asset.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less. The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area. Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There has been no change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

See Exhibit Index.

The agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:

should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;

have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to an investor; and

were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. The Partnership acknowledges that, notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary statements, it is responsible for considering whether additional specific disclosures of material information regarding material contractual provisions are required to make the statements in this Form 10-Q not misleading. Additional information about the Partnership may be found elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the Partnership’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Oxford Residential Properties I Limited Partnership

	By: Oxford Residential Properties I Corporation
	Managing General Partner

Date: August 13, 2010	By: /s/Steven D. Cordes
	Steven D. Cordes
	Senior Vice President

Date: August 13, 2010	By: /s/Stephen B. Waters
	Stephen B. Waters
	Senior Director of Partnership Accounting

OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Description of Exhibit

3.1 Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Prospectus of the Partnership, dated May 24, 1985).

4.1 Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference from Exhibit A of the Prospectus of the Partnership, dated May 24, 1985).

4.2 Second Amendment to the Amended and Restricted Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008.

10.12 Future Advance Mortgage, dated June 20, 2008, between ORP One, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, and Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation (incorporated by reference to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 20, 2008).

10.13 Secured Promissory Note, dated June 20, 2008, between ORP One, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, and Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation (incorporated by reference to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 20, 2008).

10.14 Carveout Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement, dated June 20, 2008, between AIMCO Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, an Iowa corporation (incorporated by reference to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 20, 2008).

31.1 Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

OXFORD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES I LTD PARTNERSHIP 10-Q