UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number 0-21554

DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Wisconsin

39-1472124

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

103 East Main Street, Denmark, Wisconsin 54208-0130

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(920) 863-2161

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

___ Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer

_ Non-accelerated filer _X_Smaller reporting company

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

As of ~~August~~November 812, 2012, there were 118,568 shares of the registrant's common stock (no par value) outstanding.

DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012

Page No.

PART I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition 3

Consolidated Statements of Income 4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity 5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations 22

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 31

Item 4. Controls and Procedures 31

PART II. Other Information

Item 1A. Risk Factors 31

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 32

Item 6. Exhibits 32

Signatures

Item 1. Financial Statements

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

		June 30,	December 31,
		September 30,	December 31,
		2012	2011
		(Unaudited)
Assets
	Cash and due from banks	$1619,~~031~~406,~~893~~882	$21,905,812
	Federal funds sold	69,~~394~~711,000	20,187,000
	Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value	7881,~~031~~341,~~000~~530	67,610,693
	Loans	~~304~~303,~~594~~600,~~002~~177	297,832,116
	Allowance for loan losses	(6,~~585~~406,~~076~~310)	(6,578,087)
	Net loans	$~~298~~297,~~008~~193,~~926~~867	$291,254,029
	Loans held for sale	~~446~~367,~~865~~806	485,926
	Premises and equipment, net	7,~~202~~180,~~209~~990	7,085,783
	Other investments, at cost	2,741,480	4,404,811
	Accrued interest receivable	1,~~325~~411,~~211~~433	1,244,473
	Other assets	1110,~~358~~800,~~733~~625	11,807,370
	TOTAL ASSETS	$~~421~~430,~~540~~155,~~317~~613	$425,985,897
Liabilities
	Deposits
	Noninterest-bearing	$4143,~~278~~881,~~673~~301	$47,469,622
	Interest-bearing	~~283~~289,~~088~~016,~~777~~844	280,323,469
	Total Deposits	$~~324~~332,~~367~~898,~~450~~145	$327,793,091
	Short-term borrowings	1110,~~085~~710,931	11,558,861
	Accrued interest payable	~~304~~296,~~726~~267	334,178
	Other liabilities	1,~~778~~133,~~831~~864	1,794,808
	Long-term debt	27,~~065~~057,~~399~~099	28,481,999
	Total Liabilities	$~~364~~372,~~602~~096,~~337~~306	$369,962,937
Stockholders' Equity
	Common stock, no par value, authorized 640,000 shares; outstanding 118,568 shares at 6/30/12 and 118,917 shares at 12/31/11	$18,173,975	$18,173,975
	Common stock, no par value, authorized 640,000 shares; outstanding 118,568 shares at 9/30/12 and 118,917 shares at 12/31/11	$18,173,975	$18,173,975
	Treasury stock shares, at cost (2,962 at 6/30/12 and 2,613 at 12/31/11)	(2,272,445)	(2,125,865)
	Treasury stock shares, at cost (2,962 at 9/30/12 and 2,613 at 12/31/11)	(2,272,445)	(2,125,865)
	Paid in capital	469,986	469,986
	Retained earnings	4041,~~729~~703,~~316~~655	39,918,706
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(~~162~~15,~~852~~864)	(413,842)
	Total Stockholders' Equity	$5658,~~937~~059,~~980~~307	$56,022,960
	TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$~~421~~430,~~540~~155,~~317~~613	$425,985,897
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

		For the Three Months Ended		For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
		June 30,	June 30,	June 30,	June 30,
		September 30,	September 30,	September 30,	September 30,
		2012	2011	2012	2011
Interest Income
	Loans including fees	$3,~~847~~820,~~577~~552	$3,~~935~~842,~~613~~778	$711,~~633~~454,~~587~~139	$711,~~924~~766,~~196~~974
	Investment securities:
	Taxable	~~299~~290,~~697~~599	~~302~~312,~~294~~467	~~578~~868,~~127~~726	~~547~~859,~~217~~684
	Exempt from federal tax	~~184~~157,~~435~~196	~~251~~228,~~676~~527	~~378~~536,~~840~~036	~~575~~804,~~871~~398
	Interest on federal funds sold	23,~~487~~457	3,~~504~~579	710,~~136~~593	1014,~~973~~552
	Other interest income	2520,~~804~~884	1918,~~209~~306	6687,~~894~~778	7291,~~897~~203
		$4,360,000	$4,512,296	$8,664,584	$9,131,154
		$4,292,688	$4,405,657	$12,957,272	$13,536,811
Interest Expense
	Deposits	$~~589~~530,~~242~~389	$~~769~~724,~~912~~852	$1,~~223~~754,~~911~~300	$12,~~592~~317,~~260~~112
	Short-term borrowings	1514,~~524~~430	2726,~~894~~770	3044,~~378~~808	5784,~~351~~121
	Long-term debt	~~242~~239,~~115~~489	~~254~~250,~~824~~967	~~488~~728,~~541~~030	~~506~~756,~~010~~977
		$846,881	$1,052,630	$1,742,830	$2,155,621
		$784,308	$1,002,589	$2,527,138	$3,158,210
	Net interest income	$3,~~513~~508,~~119~~380	$3,~~459~~403,~~666~~068	$610,~~921~~430,~~754~~134	$610,~~975~~378,~~533~~601
Provision for Loan Losses		~~150~~225,000	150,000	~~300~~525,000	~~300~~450,000
	Net interest income after provision for loan losses	$3,~~363~~283,~~119~~380	$3,~~309~~253,~~666~~068	$69,~~621~~905,~~754~~134	$69,~~675~~928,~~533~~601
Other Income
	Service fees and commissions	$~~216~~228,~~590~~230	$~~238~~222,~~604~~531	$~~524~~752,~~101~~331	$~~447~~669,~~415~~946
	Loan sale gains	~~117~~195,~~266~~623	3964,~~628~~087	~~235~~430,~~070~~693	~~119~~183,~~099~~186
	Investment security gains	0203,183	~~31,953~~0	0203,183	31,953
	Other	~~170~~203,~~895~~109	~~198~~197,~~691~~324	~~341~~544,~~218~~327	~~401~~598,~~215~~539
		$504,751	$508,876	$1,100,389	$999,682
		$830,145	$483,942	$1,930,534	$1,483,624
Other-than-Temporary Impairment Losses, Net
	Total other-than-temporary impairment losses	$77944,~~620~~563	$461,~~536~~028,888	$1,~~742~~733,~~488~~379	$~~963~~1,~~226~~028,888
	Amount in other comprehensive income, before taxes	(33901,~~310~~394)	33(983,~~817~~401)	(1,~~665~~613,~~303~~025)	(~~858~~878,~~399~~574)
		$44,310	$80,353	$77,185	$104,827
		$43,169	$45,487	$120,354	$150,314
Other Expense
	Salaries and employee benefits	$1,~~598~~595,~~446~~732	$1,~~497~~553,~~646~~044	$34,~~178~~774,~~316~~048	$34,~~012~~565,~~800~~844
	Occupancy expenses	~~222~~243,~~410~~742	~~239~~223,~~011~~936	~~450~~694,~~503~~245	~~484~~707,~~046~~982
	FDIC Insurance	75,000	8174,000	~~149~~224,463	~~246~~320,000
	Data processing expenses	~~170~~242,~~586~~818	~~194~~195,~~752~~337	~~413~~655,~~122~~940	~~392~~588,~~954~~291
	Professional fees	~~108~~102,~~407~~647	8789,~~743~~327	~~196~~298,~~057~~704	~~185~~274,~~332~~659
	Amortization of intangibles	4816,~~098~~032	48,~~098~~097	96112,~~196~~228	96144,~~196~~293
	Loss on sale of other real estate	~~103~~68,~~216~~389	1148,~~371~~143	~~163~~231,~~200~~771	1766,~~891~~034
	Other real estate expenses	26,~~125~~591	7421,~~615~~310	2127,~~033~~624	~~154~~175,~~195~~505
	Other operating expenses	~~248~~210,~~289~~320	~~252~~214,~~276~~995	~~447~~657,~~822~~960	~~449~~664,~~068~~063
		$2,576,577	$2,486,512	$5,115,712	$5,038,482
		$2,561,271	$2,468,189	$7,676,983	$7,506,671
	Income before income taxes	$1,~~246~~509,~~983~~085	$1,~~251~~223,~~677~~334	$24,~~529~~038,~~246~~331	$23,~~531~~755,~~906~~240
	Income tax expense	~~425~~534,~~493~~746	~~383~~375,~~481~~241	~~859~~1,~~018~~393,764	~~750~~1,~~845~~126,086
	NET INCOME	$~~821~~974,~~490~~339	$~~868~~848,~~196~~093	$12,~~670~~644,~~228~~567	$12,~~781~~629,~~061~~154
	Per Share
	Net income	$68.9322	$7.3013	$1422.0728	$1422.9811
	Dividends declared	$7.25	$7.25	$7.25	$7.25
	Weighted average shares outstanding	118,568	118,917	118,~~733~~677	118,917
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended
	For the Nine Months Ended
	June 30,	June 30,
	September 30,	September 30,
	2012	2011
Net income	$12,~~670~~644,~~228~~567	$12,~~781~~629,~~061~~154
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Unrealized gains on securities
Unrealized holding gains arising during period	~~436~~841,~~368~~362	~~232~~281,~~101~~978
Plus: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income	77,185	72,874
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income	82,829	150,314
Other comprehensive income	~~513~~758,~~553~~533	~~304~~432,~~975~~292
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income	(262,563)	(104,555)
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive income	(360,555)	(129,249)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	$250,990	$200,420
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	$397,978	$303,043
Comprehensive income	$13,~~921~~042,~~218~~545	$12,~~981~~932,~~481~~197

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock				Accumulated
					Other
			Paid in	Retained	Comprehensive
	Shares	Amount	Capital	Earnings	Loss	Total
Balance, December 31, 2011	118,917	$16,048,110	$469,986	$39,918,706	($413,842)	$56,022,960
Comprehensive income
Net income				12,~~670~~644,~~228~~567		12,~~670~~644,~~228~~567
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Change in unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale,
net of reclassification adjustment					~~250~~397,~~990~~978	~~250~~397,~~990~~978
Total comprehensive income						$13,~~921~~042,~~218~~545
Treasury stock acquisitions	(349)	(146,580)				(146,580)
Cash dividends declared, $7.25 per share				(859,618)		(859,618)
Cash dividends, $7.25 per share				(859,618)		(859,618)
Balance, June 30, 2012	118,568	$15,901,530	$469,986	$40,729,316	($162,852)	$56,937,980
Balance, September 30, 2012	118,568	$15,901,530	$469,986	$41,703,655	($15,864)	$58,059,307
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

		For the Six Months Ended
		For the Nine Months Ended
		June 30,
		September 30,
		2012	2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
	Net income	$12,~~670~~644,~~228~~567	$12,~~781~~629,~~061~~154
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to
	net cash provided by operating activities:
	Depreciation	~~189~~284,~~564~~347	~~202~~300,~~047~~391
	Provision for credit losses	~~300~~525,000	~~300~~450,000
	Amortization of intangibles	96112,~~196~~228	96144,~~196~~293
	Gains on sales of loans	(~~235~~430,~~070~~693)	(~~119~~183,~~099~~186)
	Loss on sale of other real estate	163,200	17,891
	Loss on sale of other real estate and other assets	231,588	66,033
	Gains on sale of securities	0(203,183)	(31,953)
	Loss on investment securities impairment writedowns	77,185	104,827
	Loss on investment securities impairment write-downs	120,354	150,314
	Amortization of bond premium	~~375~~593,~~346~~378	~~216~~365,~~675~~643
	Accretion of bond discount	(4366,~~608~~981)	(87133,~~181~~183)
	Mortgage loans originated for sale	(1526,~~069~~394,~~875~~237)	(712,~~127~~348,~~170~~289)
	Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans	1526,~~344~~512,~~005~~358	1014,~~570~~846,~~599~~232
	Income from bank owned life insurance	(~~133~~202,~~752~~923)	(~~130~~197,~~070~~648)
	Increase in interest receivable	(80166,~~738~~960)	(41134,~~517~~469)
	Decrease in interest payable	(2937,~~452~~911)	(2659,~~666~~536)
	Other, net	~~(152~~473,~~551)~~119	58483,~~705~~899
	Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	$23,~~470~~994,~~678~~051	$56,~~784~~347,~~345~~695
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
	Maturities and sales of available-for-sale securities	$1220,~~713~~930,~~004~~183	$1520,~~542~~127,~~834~~771
	Purchases of available-for-sale securities	(2334,~~028~~346,~~681~~055)	(2022,~~937~~753,~~094~~354)
	Money market mutual funds, net	0	(34977,~~037~~224)
	Proceeds from sale of FHLB common stock	1,663,331	0
	Federal funds sold, net	1310,~~793~~476,000	57,~~773~~310,000
	Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets	~~296~~420,~~534~~146	~~652~~922,~~908~~266
	Net (increase) decrease in loans made to customers	(76,~~151~~220,~~896~~910)	41,~~036~~212,~~446~~397
	Capital expenditures	(~~305~~379,~~990~~554)	(34116,~~880~~059)
	Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities	($27,~~020~~456,~~698~~859)	$45,~~999~~725,~~177~~797
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
	Net decrease in deposits	($3,425,641)	($10,289,256)
	Net increase (decrease) in deposits	$5,105,054	($5,267,324)
	Purchase of treasury stock	(146,580)	0
	Dividends paid	(~~862~~1,~~148~~721,766)	(~~862~~1,~~148~~724,297)
	Debt proceeds	12,~~777~~227,070	1,~~795~~995,815
	Debt repayments	(34,~~666~~499,~~600~~900)	(25,~~775~~825,000)
	Net Cash Used in Financing Activities	($6,323,899)	($12,130,589)
	Net Cash (Provided by) Used in Financing Activities	$963,878	($10,820,806)
	Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	($5,873,919)	($1,347,067)
	Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	($2,498,930)	$1,252,686
	Cash and cash equivalents, beginning	21,905,812	16,917,728
	CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING	$1619,~~031~~406,~~893~~882	$1518,~~570~~170,~~661~~414
Noncash Investing Activities:
	Loans transferred to foreclosed properties	$97186,~~000~~764	$~~805~~2,~~992~~018,860
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures:
	Cash paid for interest	$12,~~775~~570,~~042~~460	$12,~~621~~381,~~871~~061
	Cash paid for income taxes	~~717~~1,062,000	~~471~~766,980
	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

NOTE 1 –- FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited. In the opinion of management, these statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Denmark Bancshares, Inc. ("DBI"), its results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. All adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements are of a normal recurring nature. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in DBI's latest annual report on Form 10-K. DBI's subsidiaries are Denmark State Bank ("DSB"), Denmark Agricultural Credit Corporation ("DACC"), and DBI Properties, Inc. ("Properties").

Reclassifications

- Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the current year.

~~NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES~~Deregistration

- On August 31, 2012, following passage of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, which increased the number of shareholders of record threshold for deregistration under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") for banks and bank holding companies, DBI filed a Schedule 13E-3 and preliminary proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") related to a proposed going-private transaction that would, subject to shareholder approval, establish two separate and distinct classes of DBI's common stock, Class A voting common stock and Class B non-voting common stock, and reclassify shareholders of record of less than 15 shares of DBI's common stock into shares of Class B common stock. DBI intends to hold a special meeting of its shareholders prior to the end of 2012 to approve the going-private transaction and, if approved, to promptly thereafter file a Form 15 with the SEC giving notice of termination of the registration of DBI's common stock under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. The termination of DBI's registration would then become effective 90 days after filing the Form 15 and would result in DBI no longer being required to file annual or periodic reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10- and current reports on Form 8-K, or to comply with the proxy rules or file proxy materials under section 14 of the Exchange Act. Furthermore, DBI's directors and executive officers will no longer be required to comply with the requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. DBI would not be required to re-register its common stock until such time as it had 2,000 or more shareholders of record in any one class of its common stock as of the end of any calendar year.

~~The~~NOTE ~~amortized~~2 ~~cost and estimated fair market value of securities available~~-~~for-sale~~ ~~were as follows:~~INVESTMENT SECURITIES

	June 30, 2012
		Gross	Gross	Estimated
	Amortized	Unrealized	Unrealized	Fair
	Cost	Gains	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$3,500,000	$7,500	($10,000)	$3,497,500
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	40,003,709	646,642	(13,119)	40,637,232
State and local governments	27,005,486	1,220,423	(70,213)	28,155,696
Residential mortgage-backed securities	7,793,224	22,261	(2,074,913)	5,740,572
	$78,302,419	$1,896,826	($2,168,245)	$78,031,000
	December 31, 2011
		Gross	Gross	Estimated
	Amortized	Unrealized	Unrealized	Fair
	Cost	Gains	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$3,500,000	$17,050	$0	$3,517,050
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	31,729,409	505,292	(8,172)	32,226,529
State and local governments	24,628,519	1,032,038	(192,058)	25,468,499
Residential mortgage-backed securities	8,537,737	26,590	(2,165,712)	6,398,615
	$68,395,665	$1,580,970	($2,365,942)	$67,610,693

The amortized cost and estimated fair market value of securities available-for-sale were as follows:

Proceeds of $4.2 million from calls and $3.7 million from normal pay-downs were received during the second quarter of 2012. On a year-to-date basis for 2012, proceeds of $7.0 million from normal pay-downs, $5.2 million from calls and $0.5 million in maturities were received. Purchases for the quarter-ended June 30, 2012 comprised $4.0 million in agency mortgage-backed securities ("MBS"), $2.9 million of tax-exempt municipals, $1.2 million in taxable municipals and $1.0 million of agencies. For the six-months ended June 30, 2012 purchases of $15.1 million in agency MBS, $3.0 million of agencies, $2.9 million of tax-exempt municipals and $2.0 million of taxable municipals were made.

	September 30, 2012
		Gross	Gross	Estimated
	Amortized	Unrealized	Unrealized	Fair
	Cost	Gains	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$4,500,000	$11,200	$0	$4,511,200
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	39,395,317	747,242	(29,750)	40,112,809
State and local governments	27,560,746	1,101,935	(46,483)	28,616,198
Asset-backed securities	2,456,474	0	(724)	2,455,750
Residential mortgage-backed securities	7,455,432	20,361	(1,830,220)	5,645,573
	$81,367,969	$1,880,738	($1,907,177)	$81,341,530

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities at June 30, 2012, by maturity were as follows:

	December 31, 2011
		Gross	Gross	Estimated
	Amortized	Unrealized	Unrealized	Fair
	Cost	Gains	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$3,500,000	$17,050	$0	$3,517,050
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	31,729,409	505,292	(8,172)	32,226,529
State and local governments	24,628,519	1,032,038	(192,058)	25,468,499
Residential mortgage-backed securities	8,537,737	26,590	(2,165,712)	6,398,615
	$68,395,665	$1,580,970	($2,365,942)	$67,610,693

	Securities Available-for-Sale
		Estimated
	Amortized	Fair
Amounts Maturing	Cost	Value
Within one year	$5,045,845	$5,090,937
From one through five years	40,670,020	40,453,753
From five through ten years	20,775,223	20,713,760
After ten years	11,811,331	11,772,550
	$78,302,419	$78,031,000

Proceeds of $4.1 million from normal pay-downs, $3.0 million from the sale of 15 securities and $0.9 million from calls were received during the third quarter of 2012. On a year-to-date basis for 2012, proceeds of $11.1 million from normal pay-downs, $6.1 million from calls, $3.0 million from securities sales and $0.5 million in maturities were received. Purchases for the quarter-ended September 30, 2012 comprised $4.0 million in agency mortgage-backed securities ("MBS"), $3.0 million of tax-exempt municipals, $2.4 million in asset-backed securities, $1.0 million in agencies and $0.9 million of taxable municipals. For the nine-months ended September 30, 2012 purchases of $19.1 million in agency MBS, $4.0 million of agencies, $5.9 million of tax-exempt municipals, $2.9 million of taxable municipals and $2.4 million in asset-backed securities were made.

~~MBS~~The ~~are~~amortized ~~allocated~~cost ~~according to their expected prepayments rather than their contractual maturities. Certain state~~ and ~~local~~estimated ~~governments'~~fair ~~securities are allocated according to their put date. Fair~~ values of securities ~~are~~at ~~estimated~~September ~~based~~30, on2012, ~~financial~~by ~~models~~maturity orwere ~~prices~~as ~~paid for similar securities. It is possible interest rates could change considerably resulting in a material change in the estimated fair value of the securities.~~follows:

At June 30, 2012, twenty-four debt securities have unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 11.1% from DSB's amortized cost basis. Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position follows:

	Securities Available-for-Sale
		Estimated
	Amortized	Fair
Amounts Maturing	Cost	Value
Within one year	$4,640,528	$4,646,691
From one through five years	40,499,640	40,409,603
From five through ten years	24,451,655	24,491,724
After ten years	11,776,146	11,793,512
	$81,367,969	$81,341,530

June 30, 2012	Less Than Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
	Gross	Estimated	Gross	Estimated
	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair
Securities Available for Sale	Losses	Value	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$10,000	$990,000	$0	$0
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	13,119	4,666,042	0	0
State and local governments	39,832	6,476,056	30,381	380,152
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	0	2,074,913	4,909,496
Total securities available for sale	$62,951	$12,132,098	$2,105,294	$5,289,648
December 31, 2011	Less Than Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
	Gross	Estimated	Gross	Estimated
	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair
Securities Available for Sale	Losses	Value	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	$8,172	$2,388,919	$0	$0
State and local governments	14,144	817,753	177,914	1,808,504
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	0	2,165,712	5,359,064
Total securities available for sale	$22,316	$3,206,672	$2,343,626	$7,167,568

MBS are allocated according to their expected prepayments rather than their contractual maturities. Certain state and local governments' securities are allocated according to their put date. Fair values of securities are estimated based on financial models or prices paid for similar securities. It is possible interest rates could change considerably resulting in a material change in the estimated fair value of the securities.

~~All~~At September 30, 2012, twenty-two debt securities ~~with~~have unrealized losses ~~are~~with ~~assessed~~aggregate todepreciation ~~determine~~of if9.3% ~~the~~from DSB's ~~impairment~~amortized iscost ~~other-than-temporary~~basis. ~~Factors~~ ~~that~~Information ~~are~~pertaining ~~evaluated~~to ~~include~~securities ~~the~~with ~~mortgage~~gross unrealized ~~loan~~losses ~~types~~aggregated ~~supporting~~by ~~the~~investment ~~securities,~~category ~~delinquency~~ and ~~foreclosure~~length ~~rates,~~of ~~credit~~time ~~support,~~that individual ~~weighted~~securities ~~average~~have ~~loan-to-value,~~been ~~and~~in ~~year~~a ofcontinuous ~~origination,~~loss ~~among others.~~position follows:

Currently, a quarterly analysis by a third party is performed on three residential MBS secured by non-traditional loan types in order to determine whether they are other-than-temporarily impaired ("OTTI"). The purpose of the third party evaluation is to determine if the present value of the expected cash flows is less than the amortized costs, thereby resulting in credit loss, in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance under FASB ASC Topic 320. The third party determines an estimated fair value for each security based on discounted cash flow analyses. The estimates are based on the following key valuation assumptions - collateral cash flows, prepayment assumptions, default rates, loss severity, liquidation lag, bond waterfall and internal rate of return. Since there is currently no active secondary market for these types of securities due to the non-traditional loan types supporting the securities, these valuations are considered Level 3 inputs as defined in Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement. Additional securities may be analyzed in the future if deemed necessary to determine whether they are OTTI and if so, if any possible credit loss exists.

September 30, 2012	Less Than Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
	Gross	Estimated	Gross	Estimated
	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair
Securities Available for Sale	Losses	Value	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$0	$0	$0
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	29,750	5,918,015	0	0
State and local governments	21,468	4,935,622	25,015	385,482
Asset-backed securities	724	2,455,750	0	0
Residential MBS	2,058	295,604	1,828,162	4,606,185
Total securities available for sale	$54,000	$13,604,991	$1,853,177	$4,991,667

Two of the three securities supported by non-traditional loan types were previously found to have credit losses since a portion of the unrealized losses is due to an expected cash flow shortfall. As such, these securities were determined to be OTTI. DBI does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that DBI will be required to sell the securities before the anticipated recovery of their remaining amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. The analysis on the third security did not reveal any credit loss nor was the security found to be OTTI. The total credit loss that was recognized in earnings through December 31, 2011 was $0.6 million. The analysis performed as of June 30, 2012 resulted in an additional $44,310 of credit loss that was recorded through the income statement during the current period on one of the OTTI securities. This results in a total credit loss for the first six months of 2012 of $77,185 being recognized. Unrealized losses on the three securities analyzed by the third party were recognized through accumulated other comprehensive loss on the balance sheet as of June 30, 2012, net of tax, in the amount of $1.2 million.

December 31, 2011	Less Than Twelve Months		Over Twelve Months
	Gross	Estimated	Gross	Estimated
	Unrealized	Fair	Unrealized	Fair
Securities Available for Sale	Losses	Value	Losses	Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	$8,172	$2,388,919	$0	$0
State and local governments	14,144	817,753	177,914	1,808,504
Residential MBS	0	0	2,165,712	5,359,064
Total securities available for sale	$22,316	$3,206,672	$2,343,626	$7,167,568

~~The~~All securities with unrealized losses ~~on the remainder of the residential MBS~~ are assessed ~~due~~ to ~~the~~determine ~~distressed~~if ~~and~~the ~~illiquid~~impairment ~~markets~~is ~~for collateralized mortgage obligations~~other-than-temporary. ~~The~~ ~~securities~~Factors that are ~~investments~~evaluated ininclude ~~senior~~the ~~tranches with adequate credit support from subordinate tranches, are supported by traditional~~ mortgage ~~loans~~loan ~~that~~types ~~originated~~supporting ~~between~~the ~~2002 and 2005~~securities, ~~have low~~ delinquency and foreclosure rates, ~~and~~credit ~~reasonable~~support, weighted average loan-to-value, ~~ratios. DBI~~and ~~does~~year ~~not~~of ~~consider these investments to be OTTI at June 30~~origination, ~~2012~~among others.

~~Changes~~Currently, a quarterly analysis by a third party is performed on three residential MBS secured by non-traditional loan types in order to determine whether they are other-than-temporarily impaired ("OTTI"). The purpose of the third party evaluation is to determine if the present value of the expected cash flows is less than the amortized costs, thereby resulting in credit ~~losses~~loss, ~~recognized~~in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance under FASB ASC Topic 320. The third party determines an estimated fair value for each security based on discounted cash flow analyses. The estimates are based on the following key valuation assumptions - collateral, cash flows, prepayment assumptions, default rates, loss severity, liquidation lag, bond waterfall and internal rate of return. Since there is currently no active secondary market for these types of securities ~~with~~due ~~OTTI~~to ~~were~~the non-traditional loan types supporting the securities, these valuations are considered Level 3 inputs as ~~follows:~~defined in Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement. Additional securities may be analyzed in the future if deemed necessary to determine whether they are OTTI and if so, if any possible credit loss exists.

	For the Six Months Ended		For the Year Ended
	June 30,		December 31,
	2012	2011	2011
Credit losses recognized in earnings, beginning of period	($637,245)	($432,488)	($432,488)
Credit losses for OTTI not previously recognized	(77,185)	(104,827)	(204,757)
Credit losses recognized in earnings, end of period	($714,430)	($537,315)	($637,245)

Two of the three securities supported by non-traditional loan types were previously found to have credit losses since a portion of the unrealized losses is due to an expected cash flow shortfall. As such, these securities were determined to be OTTI. DBI does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that DBI will be required to sell the securities before the anticipated recovery of their remaining amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. The analysis on the third security did not reveal any credit loss nor was the security found to be OTTI. The total credit loss that was recognized in earnings through December 31, 2011 was $0.6 million. The analysis performed as of September 30, 2012 resulted in an additional $43,169 of credit loss that was recorded through the income statement during the current period on one of the OTTI securities. This results in a total credit loss for the first nine months of 2012 of $120,354 being recognized. Unrealized losses on the three securities analyzed by the third party were recognized through accumulated other comprehensive loss on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2012, net of tax, in the amount of $1.1 million.

~~NOTE~~The 3unrealized losses on the remainder of the residential MBS are due to the distressed and illiquid markets for collateralized mortgage obligations. The securities are investments in senior tranches with adequate credit support from subordinate tranches, are supported by traditional mortgage loans that originated between 2002 and 2005, have low delinquency and foreclosure rates, and reasonable loan-to-value ~~LOANS~~ratios. DBI does not consider these investments to be OTTI at September 30, 2012.

~~Loans~~Changes ~~are~~in ~~reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of the allowance for~~ credit losses~~. Interest~~ onrecognized ~~loans~~for securities iswith ~~calculated~~OTTI ~~and~~were accrued by using the simple interest method on the daily balance of the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees are credited to income when received and the related loan origination costs are expensed as ~~incurred. Capitalization of the fees net of the related costs would not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.~~follows:

DBI's customer information system tracks the past due status of all loans beginning with the first day a payment is late. On a weekly basis, lenders are given a report with all loans past due one day or more to allow them to actively monitor the portfolio and attempt to keep past due levels to a minimum.

	For the Nine Months Ended		For the Year Ended
	September 30,		December 31,
	2012	2011	2011
Credit losses recognized in earnings, beginning of period	($637,245)	($432,488)	($432,488)
Credit losses for OTTI not previously recognized	(120,354)	(150,314)	(204,757)
Credit losses recognized in earnings, end of period	($757,599)	($582,802)	($637,245)

~~All~~NOTE ~~loans~~3 ~~are~~- given an internal risk rating when the loan is originated. On a quarterly basis, risk rating reports are distributed to the lenders to ensure that loans are appropriately rated. On an annual basis, all commercial loans over $100,000 and agricultural loans over $200,000 are reviewed by the loan officer and/or credit analyst. All loans over $1 million are independently reviewed annually by the Chief Credit Officer. An independent third party also performs periodic reviews of risk ratings to ensure that loans are accurately graded. The internal risk ratings are defined as:LOANS

~~Non-classified~~Loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of the allowance for credit losses. Interest on loans is calculated and accrued by using the simple interest method on the daily balance of the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees are credited to income when received and the related loan origination costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalization of the fees net of the related costs would not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

~~Special~~DBI's ~~mention~~customer information system tracks the past due status of all loans beginning with the first day a payment is late. On a weekly basis, lenders are given a report with all loans past due one day or more to allow them to actively monitor the portfolio and attempt to keep past due levels to a minimum.

~~Substandard~~All loans are given an internal risk rating when the loan is originated. On a quarterly basis, risk rating reports are distributed to the lenders to ensure that loans are appropriately rated. On an annual basis, all commercial loans over $100,000 and agricultural loans over $200,000 are reviewed by the loan officer and/or credit analyst. All loans over $1 million are independently reviewed annually by the Chief Credit Officer. An independent third party also performs periodic reviews of risk ratings to ensure that loans are accurately graded. The internal risk ratings are defined as:

~~Doubtful~~Non-classified loans

are assigned a risk rating of 1 - 4, with a one-rated credit being the highest quality. Non-classified loans have credit quality that ranges from well above average quality to some inherent industry weaknesses that may present higher than average risk due to conditions affecting the borrower, the borrower's industry or economic environment.

~~Loss~~Special mention loans

are assigned a risk rating of 5. Potential weaknesses exist that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of repayment prospects or in DSB's credit position at some future date.

~~DBI's~~Substandard ~~policy is to place into nonaccrual status all~~ loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more, along with other loans as to which reasonable doubt exists to the full and timely collection of principal and/or interest based on management's view of the financial condition of the borrower. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.

are assigned a rating of 6. These loans are inadequately protected by the current worth and borrowing capacity of the borrower. Well-defined weaknesses exist that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. There is a possibility of some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. At this point, the loan may still be performing and accruing.

~~Loan~~Doubtful ~~charge-offs for all~~ loans will occur as soon as there is a reasonable probability of loss. When the amount of the loss can be readily calculated, the charge-off will be recorded as soon as practical within the calendar quarter the loss was identified. Loans that are partially charged-off will be placed in nonaccrual status unless the remaining loan is restructured with adequate collateral and payments are assured and current.

are rated 7 and have all the weaknesses of a substandard credit plus the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of current facts, conditions and values highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high but because of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors, which may work to the advantage of strengthening the asset, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status can be determined.

ALoss loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that not all amounts due will be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Interest income is recognized in the same manner described above for nonaccrual loans~~. Further detail on the analysis of impaired loans can be found in the discussion of the Allowance for Loan Losses, below.~~

are internally rated as an 8. A loss amount has been determined and this has been charged-off against the allowance for loan losses. All or a portion of the charge-off may be recovered in the future and any such recoveries would also be recorded through the allowance.

~~Allowance~~DBI's ~~for~~policy ~~Loan~~is ~~Losses~~to place into nonaccrual status all loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more, along with other loans as to which reasonable doubt exists to the full and timely collection of principal and/or interest based on management's view of the financial condition of the borrower. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.

~~The~~Loan ~~allowance~~charge-offs for ~~loan~~all ~~losses~~loans iswill anoccur ~~estimate~~as soon ofas ~~the~~there ~~losses~~is ~~that~~a ~~have~~reasonable ~~been~~probability ~~incurred~~of ~~in the loan portfolio~~loss. ~~The~~ ~~allowance~~When isthe ~~based~~amount onof ~~two~~the ~~basic~~loss can ~~accounting~~be ~~principles:~~readily ~~(1)~~calculated, ~~FASB~~the ~~Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 310~~charge-10off ~~"Receivables~~will ~~- Overall," (formerly FAS 114), which requires that losses~~ be ~~accrued~~recorded ~~when~~as itsoon isas ~~probable~~practical within ~~that~~the ~~DBI~~calendar ~~will~~quarter ~~not collect all principal and interest payments according to~~ the ~~loan's~~loss ~~contractual~~was ~~terms,~~identified. ~~and~~Loans ~~(2) FASB ASC Topic 450, "Contingencies," (formerly FAS 5), which requires~~ that ~~losses be accrued when they~~ are ~~probable~~partially charged-off ofwill ~~occurring~~be ~~and~~placed ~~estimable. The~~in ~~FFIEC~~nonaccrual ~~"Interagency~~status ~~Policy~~unless ~~Statement on~~ the ~~Allowance~~remaining ~~for~~loan ~~Loan~~is restructured ~~and~~with ~~Lease~~adequate ~~Losses"~~collateral ~~provides~~and ~~additional~~payments ~~guidance~~are onassured ~~the allowance methodology~~and current.

OnA aloan ~~quarterly~~is ~~basis~~impaired when, ~~management~~based ~~utilizes~~on acurrent information ~~systematic~~and ~~methodology~~events, toit ~~determine~~is anprobable ~~appropriate allowance for loan losses. This methodology includes a loan grading system~~ that ~~requires~~not ~~quarterly~~all ~~reviews;~~amounts ~~identification~~due ofwill ~~loans to~~ be collected ~~evaluated~~according onto anthe ~~individual~~contractual ~~basis~~terms ~~for impairment; results~~ of ~~independent~~the ~~reviews~~loan ofagreement. ~~asset~~Interest income ~~quality~~is ~~and~~recognized ~~the~~in ~~adequacy of~~ the ~~allowance~~same bymanner ~~regulatory~~described ~~agencies;~~above ~~consideration~~for ofnonaccrual ~~current~~loans. Further ~~trends~~detail ~~and~~on ~~volumes~~the analysis of ~~nonperforming,~~impaired ~~past-due, nonaccrual and potential problem~~ loans; ascan ~~well~~be asfound ~~national~~in ~~and~~the ~~local~~discussion of ~~economic~~the ~~trends~~Allowance ~~and~~for ~~industry~~Loan ~~conditions~~Losses, below.

InAllowance applying the methodology, all troubled debt restructurings, regardless of size, are considered impaired and will be individually evaluated. All nonaccrual and watchlist commercial real estate, construction and land development, agricultural real estate, multifamily residential real estate, commercial, and agricultural production loans over $50,000 are evaluated individually to determine if they are impaired. Nonaccrual residential real estate or consumer loans with characteristics that differ from loans that are typical for ~~DBI~~Loan will also be considered impaired and evaluated individually as there would be no pool of similar loans to evaluate these loans under ASC Topic 450. Impaired loans are measured at the estimated fair value of the collateral. If the estimated fair value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized by creating a valuation allowance in conjunction with ASC Topic 310-10.Losses

~~Loans~~The ~~that~~allowance ~~are~~for ~~not~~loan ~~impaired~~losses ~~are~~is ~~segmented~~an ~~into~~estimate of ~~groups~~the bylosses ~~type~~that ofhave ~~loan. The~~been ~~following~~incurred ~~loan~~in ~~types~~the ~~are~~loan ~~utilized~~portfolio. soThe ~~each~~allowance ~~segment~~is based ofon ~~loans~~two ~~will~~basic ~~have~~accounting ~~similar risk factors~~principles: (1) ~~residential~~FASB ~~real~~Accounting ~~estate,~~Standards Codification (2ASC) ~~agricultural~~Topic ~~real~~310-10 ~~estate~~"Receivables - Overall," (3formerly FAS 114), ~~commercial~~which ~~real~~requires ~~estate,~~that ~~(4)~~losses ~~construction~~be accrued when it is probable that DBI will not collect all principal and ~~land~~interest ~~development,~~payments ~~(5)~~according ~~commercial,~~to ~~(6)~~the ~~agricultural~~loan's contractual terms, and (72) ~~consumer~~FASB ASC Topic 450, "Contingencies," (8formerly FAS 5), ~~guaranteed~~which ~~loans~~requires ~~and~~that ~~(9)~~losses ~~other. These~~be ~~loans~~accrued when they are probable ~~further~~of ~~segmented~~occurring byand ~~internal~~estimable. ~~risk~~The ~~ratings~~FFIEC of"Interagency ~~non-classified,~~Policy ~~special~~Statement ~~mention,~~on the ~~substandard~~Allowance for Loan and ~~doubtful,~~Lease ~~which~~Losses" ~~are~~provides ~~defined~~additional ~~above~~guidance on the allowance methodology.

~~Risk~~On ~~factor~~a ~~percentages~~quarterly ~~are~~basis, ~~applied~~management toutilizes ~~the~~a systematic ~~risk~~methodology ~~rating segments of the non-impaired loans~~ to ~~calculate~~determine an appropriate allowance ~~allocation~~for inloan ~~conjunction~~losses. This ~~with~~methodology ~~ASC~~includes ~~Topic~~a ~~450. The~~loan ~~risk~~grading ~~factor~~system ~~percentages~~that ~~are~~requires ~~based~~quarterly reviews; onidentification ~~historical~~of ~~loan~~loans ~~loss~~to ~~experience~~be ~~for~~evaluated ~~each~~on ~~loan~~an ~~type~~individual ~~and~~basis ~~are adjusted~~ for impairment; ~~current~~results ~~economic~~of ~~conditions~~independent ~~and~~reviews ~~trends~~of asasset ~~well as internal loan~~ quality ~~trends. The~~and ~~historical loan loss percentages are applied to~~ the ~~non-classified~~adequacy ~~portion~~ of the ~~portfolio to determine the required allocation to the~~ allowance~~. The~~ ~~historical loan loss percentages are then multiplied~~ by aregulatory ~~factor~~agencies; ~~based~~consideration onof current ~~economic~~trends ~~conditions~~and volumes ~~to calculate the allocation for each~~ of ~~the~~nonperforming, ~~remaining~~past-due, ~~risk~~nonaccrual ~~rating~~and ~~categories~~potential ofproblem ~~the non-impaired~~ loans~~. The~~; ~~current~~as well ~~economic conditions take into account items such~~ as ~~vacancy~~national ~~rates~~and ~~for~~local ~~rental~~economic ~~properties;~~trends ~~property values based on actual sales transactions; income projections based on current prices such as dairy commodities;~~ and ~~other~~industry ~~available economic data~~conditions.

~~The~~In ~~above~~applying ~~steps~~the ~~result~~methodology, inall ~~calculations~~troubled debt ~~that~~restructurings, ~~estimate~~regardless ~~the~~of ~~loan~~size, ~~losses~~are ~~inherent~~considered inimpaired ~~the~~and ~~portfolio~~will atbe individually ~~that time~~evaluated. ~~The~~ ~~calculations~~All ~~are~~nonaccrual ~~used~~and towatchlist ~~confirm~~commercial ~~the~~real ~~adequacy~~estate, construction and ~~appropriateness~~land ofdevelopment, ~~the~~agricultural ~~actual~~real ~~balance~~estate, ofmultifamily residential ~~the~~real ~~allowance~~estate, ~~recognizing~~commercial, and agricultural production loans over $50,000 are evaluated individually to determine if they are impaired. Nonaccrual residential real estate or consumer loans with characteristics that differ ~~the~~from ~~allowance~~loans ~~represents~~that anare ~~aggregation~~typical offor ~~judgments~~DBI will also be considered impaired and evaluated ~~estimates~~individually byas ~~management~~there would be no pool of similar loans to evaluate these loans under ASC Topic 450. ~~Such~~ ~~calculations~~Impaired ~~will~~loans ~~influence~~are measured at the estimated ~~amount~~fair value of ~~future~~the ~~provisions~~collateral. ~~for~~If the estimated fair value of the impaired loan ~~losses~~is ~~charged~~less tothan ~~expense~~the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized by creating a valuation allowance in conjunction with ASC Topic 310-10.

~~The~~Loans ~~calculation~~that isare ~~submitted~~not toimpaired ~~DSB's~~are ~~Board~~segmented into groups by type of ~~Directors~~loan. ~~quarterly~~The ~~along~~following ~~with~~loan atypes ~~recommendation~~are ~~for~~utilized ~~the~~so ~~amount~~each segment of ~~the~~loans ~~monthly~~will ~~provision~~have tosimilar ~~the~~risk ~~allowance. If~~factors: ~~the~~(1) ~~mix~~residential ~~and~~real ~~amount~~estate, (2) ofagricultural ~~future~~real ~~charge-offs~~estate, ~~differ~~(3) ~~significantly~~commercial ~~from~~real ~~those~~estate, ~~assumptions~~(4) ~~used~~construction byand land ~~management~~development, in(5) ~~making~~commercial, ~~its~~(6) ~~determination~~agricultural, ~~the~~(7) ~~allowance~~consumer, (8) guaranteed loans and ~~provision~~(9) ~~expense~~other. ~~could~~These beloans ~~materially~~are ~~affected~~further segmented by internal risk ratings of non-classified, special mention, substandard and doubtful, which are defined above.

~~Major~~Risk ~~categories~~factor percentages are applied to the risk rating segments of the non-impaired loans ~~included~~to calculate an allowance allocation in ~~the~~conjunction with ASC Topic 450. The risk factor percentages are based on historical loan loss experience for each loan type and are adjusted for current economic conditions and trends as well as internal loan quality trends. The historical loan loss percentages are applied to the non-classified portion of the portfolio to determine the required allocation to the allowance. The historical loan loss percentages are then multiplied by a factor based on current economic conditions to calculate the allocation for each of the remaining risk rating categories of the non-impaired loans. The current economic conditions take into account items such as ~~follows:~~vacancy rates for rental properties; property values based on actual sales transactions; income projections based on current prices such as dairy commodities; and other available economic data.

	June 30,	December 31,
	2012	2011
Real Estate:
Residential	$71,534,648	$72,655,569
Commercial	60,709,030	60,864,761
Agricultural	82,213,621	78,767,692
Construction	10,503,737	11,655,550
	224,961,036	223,943,572
Commercial	40,285,836	35,178,049
Agricultural	28,810,254	27,661,420
Consumer and other	10,536,876	11,049,075
TOTAL	$304,594,002	$297,832,116

The above steps result in calculations that estimate the loan losses inherent in the portfolio at that time. The calculations are used to confirm the adequacy and appropriateness of the actual balance of the allowance, recognizing that the allowance represents an aggregation of judgments and estimates by management. Such calculations will influence the amount of future provisions for loan losses charged to expense.

The ~~following~~calculation ~~table~~is ~~presents~~submitted ~~information~~to ~~related~~DSB's Board of Directors quarterly along with a recommendation for the amount of the monthly provision to the ~~average~~allowance. ~~recorded~~If ~~investment~~the mix and ~~interest~~amount ~~income~~of ~~recognized~~future oncharge-offs differ ~~impaired~~significantly ~~loans~~from ~~for~~those ~~the~~assumptions ~~six~~used ~~months~~by ~~ended~~management ~~June~~in 30making its determination, ~~2012~~the allowance and ~~June~~provision ~~30,~~expense ~~2011:~~could be materially affected.

		Six months ended		Six months ended
		June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
	$(000)s	Average	Interest	Average	Interest
		Recorded	Income	Recorded	Income
		Investment	Recognized	Investment	Recognized
With no related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,640	$10	$573	$5
Commercial Real Estate		2,184	15	1,862	11
Construction & Land Dev		440	3	2,344	52
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	246	2
Commercial		954	7	950	6
Agricultural		0	0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	44	1
With a related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,011	$11	$1,282	$7
Commercial Real Estate		2,434	22	4,122	8
Construction & Land Dev		4,497	26	1,962	45
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	0
Commercial		41	0	42	0
Agricultural		0	0	116	0
Consumer		143	0	149	0
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$2,651	$21	$1,855	$12
Commercial Real Estate		4,618	37	5,984	19
Construction & Land Dev		4,937	29	4,306	97
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	246	2
Commercial		995	7	992	6
Agricultural		0	0	116	0
Consumer		143	0	193	1
	Total	$13,344	$94	$13,692	$137

Major categories of loans included in the loan portfolio are as follows:

The following tables show the investment in impaired loans and the corresponding allowance for those loans as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	September 30,	December 31,
	2012	2011
Real Estate:
Residential	$70,114,164	$72,655,569
Commercial	59,090,321	60,864,761
Agricultural	76,039,949	78,767,692
Construction	13,304,574	11,655,550
	218,549,008	223,943,572

Commercial	41,007,441	35,178,049
Agricultural	33,433,291	27,661,420
Consumer and other	10,610,437	11,049,075
TOTAL	$303,600,177	$297,832,116

~~Impaired~~The ~~Loans~~following table presents information related to the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011:

	$(000)s		Unpaid
		Nine months ended
		Recorded	Principal	Related
		September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011
June 30, 2012		Investment	Balance	Allowance
	$(000)s	Average	Interest	Average	Interest
With no related allowance:
		Recorded	Income	Recorded	Income
Residential Real Estate		$1,472	$1,626	$0
		Investment	Recognized	Investment	Recognized
Commercial Real Estate		1,910	2,176	0
With no related allowance:
Construction & Land Dev		260	260	0
Residential Real Estate		$1,353	$16	$579	$10
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial Real Estate		2,256	22	2,054	28
Commercial		1,031	1,086	0
Construction & Land Dev		366	4	2,941	80
Agricultural		0	0	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	0
Commercial		810	12	1,228	10
With a related allowance:
Agricultural		0	0	0	0
Residential Real Estate		$918	$1,009	$144
Consumer		0	0	44	1
Commercial Real Estate		1,930	2,257	580
With a related allowance:
Construction & Land Dev		4,459	4,484	926
Residential Real Estate		$1,071	$16	$1,088	$2
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial Real Estate		1,872	32	2,964	(6)
Commercial		37	41	13
Construction & Land Dev		4,492	39	2,835	60
Agricultural		0	0	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	246	2
Consumer		140	142	127
Commercial		58	0	103	2
Total:
Agricultural		0	0	0	0
Residential Real Estate		$2,390	$2,635	$144
Consumer		0	0	148	0
Commercial Real Estate		3,840	4,433	580
Total:
Construction & Land Dev		4,719	4,744	926
Residential Real Estate		$2,424	$32	$1,667	$12
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial Real Estate		4,128	54	5,018	22
Commercial		1,068	1,127	13
Construction & Land Dev		4,858	43	5,776	140
Agricultural		0	0	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	246	2
Consumer		140	142	127
Commercial		868	12	1,331	12
	Total	$12,157	$13,081	$1,790
Agricultural		0	0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	192	1
	Total	$12,278	$141	$14,230	$189

	$(000)s		Unpaid
		Recorded	Principal	Related
December 31, 2011		Investment	Balance	Allowance
With no related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$805	$841	$0
Commercial Real Estate		1,433	1,698	0
Construction & Land Dev		2,658	2,658	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		890	935	0
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		43	43	0
With a related allowance:
Residential Real Estate		$1,190	$1,392	$171
Commercial Real Estate		2,482	2,615	721
Construction & Land Dev		2,832	2,832	580
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		38	41	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		142	144	129
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$1,995	$2,233	$171
Commercial Real Estate		3,915	4,313	721
Construction & Land Dev		5,490	5,490	580
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		928	976	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		185	187	129
	Total	$12,513	$13,199	$1,615

The following tables show the investment in impaired loans and the corresponding allowance for those loans as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

~~Recorded~~Impaired ~~Investment in Financing Receivables~~Loans

		June 30,
	$(000)s		Unpaid
		2012		2011		December 31, 2011
		Recorded	Principal	Related
			Ending Balance		Ending Balance		Ending Balance
September 30, 2012		Investment	Balance	Allowance
			Individually		Individually		Individually
With no related allowance:
	$(000)s	Ending	Evaluated	Ending	Evaluated	Ending	Evaluated
Residential Real Estate		$1,174	$1,333	$0
		Balance	for Impairment	Balance	for Impairment	Balance	for Impairment
Commercial Real Estate		1,785	2,079	0
Residential Real Estate		$71,535	$2,390	$74,372	$1,610	$72,656	$1,995
Construction & Land Dev		243	243	0
Commercial Real Estate		60,709	3,840	61,908	4,954	60,865	3,915
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Construction & Land Dev		10,504	4,719	11,985	4,300	11,655	5,490
Commercial		836	895	0
Agricultural Real Estate		82,213	0	71,864	246	78,768	0
Agricultural		0	0	0
Commercial		40,286	1,068	38,623	726	35,178	928
Consumer		0	0	0
Agricultural		28,810	0	24,859	116	27,661	0
With a related allowance:
Consumer		10,537	140	10,244	189	11,049	185
Residential Real Estate		$973	$1,067	$168
Total		$304,594	$12,157	$293,855	$12,141	$297,832	$12,513
Commercial Real Estate		1,706	1,841	505
Construction & Land Dev		4,420	4,470	1,030
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		51	57	27
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	0
Total:
Residential Real Estate		$2,147	$2,400	$168
Commercial Real Estate		3,491	3,920	505
Construction & Land Dev		4,663	4,713	1,030
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		887	952	27
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		0	0	0
	Total	$11,188	$11,985	$1,730

Allowance for Loan Losses

	$(000)s		Unpaid
		Recorded	Principal	Related
December 31, 2011		Investment	Balance	Allowance
*With no related allowance:*
Residential Real Estate		$805	$841	$0
Commercial Real Estate		1,433	1,698	0
Construction & Land Dev		2,658	2,658	0
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		890	935	0
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		43	43	0

*With a related allowance:*
Residential Real Estate		$1,190	$1,392	$171
Commercial Real Estate		2,482	2,615	721
Construction & Land Dev		2,832	2,832	580
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		38	41	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		142	144	129

*Total:*
Residential Real Estate		$1,995	$2,233	$171
Commercial Real Estate		3,915	4,313	721
Construction & Land Dev		5,490	5,490	580
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0
Commercial		928	976	14
Agricultural		0	0	0
Consumer		185	187	129
	Total	$12,513	$13,199	$1,615

~~For~~Recorded ~~the~~Investment ~~Six~~in ~~Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011~~Financing Receivables

	$(000)s						Ending Balance
		September 30,
		Beginning				Ending	Individually
		2012		2011		December 31, 2011
		Balance				Balance	Evaluated
			Ending Balance		Ending Balance		Ending Balance
2012		1/1/2012	Charge-offs	Recoveries	Provision	6/30/2012	for Impairment
			Individually		Individually		Individually
Residential Real Estate		$1,132	($134)	$9	$64	$1,071	$144
	$(000)s	Ending	Evaluated	Ending	Evaluated	Ending	Evaluated
Commercial Real Estate		2,858	(180)	7	88	2,773	580
		Balance	for Impairment	Balance	for Impairment	Balance	for Impairment
Construction & Land Dev		1,163	0	0	310	1,473	926
Residential Real Estate		$70,114	$2,147	$75,384	$1,632	$72,656	$1,995
Agricultural Real Estate		198	0	0	1	199	0
Commercial Real Estate		59,090	3,491	60,420	4,491	60,865	3,915
Commercial		202	0	10	23	235	13
Construction & Land Dev		13,305	4,663	13,144	5,769	11,655	5,490
Agricultural		263	0	0	(15)	248	0
Agricultural Real Estate		76,040	0	76,893	246	78,768	0
Consumer		150	(10)	5	3	148	127
Commercial		41,008	887	35,090	1,083	35,178	928
Unallocated		612	0	0	(174)	438	0
Agricultural		33,433	0	24,104	0	27,661	0
Total		$6,578	($324)	$31	$300	$6,585	$1,790
Consumer		10,610	0	10,476	189	11,049	185
							Ending Balance
Unallocated		0	0	0	0	0	0
	$(000)s	Beginning				Ending	Individually
Total		$303,600	$11,188	$295,511	$13,410	$297,832	$12,513
		Balance				Balance	Evaluated
2011		1/1/2011	Charge-offs	Recoveries	Provision	6/30/2011	for Impairment
Residential Real Estate		$1,429	($32)	$19	$68	$1,484	$299
Commercial Real Estate		2,849	(431)	3	272	2,693	698
Construction & Land Dev		880	(139)	25	47	813	89
Agricultural Real Estate		204	0	0	1	205	0
Commercial		278	(252)	29	187	242	17
Agricultural		347	0	5	(10)	342	101
Consumer		160	(7)	3	(2)	154	133
Unallocated		718	0	0	(263)	455	0
Total		$6,865	($861)	$84	$300	$6,388	$1,337

~~Nonaccrual~~Allowance ~~loans~~for ~~totaled~~Loan ~~$7.2~~Losses million and $8.7 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. There were no loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing. A schedule of loans by the number of days past due (including nonaccrual loans) along with a schedule of credit quality indicators follows:

~~Age~~For ~~Analysis~~the ofNine ~~Past~~Months ~~Due~~Ended ~~Financing~~September ~~Receivables~~30, 2012 and 2011

		30-89 Days	90 Days	Total		Total Financing
	$(000)s						Ending Balance
	$(000)s	Past Due	& Over	Past Due	Current	Receivables
		Beginning				Ending	Individually
	June 30, 2012
		Balance				Balance	Evaluated
Residential Real Estate		$423	$860	$1,283	$70,252	$71,535
2012		1/1/2012	Charge-offs	Recoveries	Provision	9/30/2012	for Impairment
Commercial Real Estate		0	815	815	59,894	60,709
Residential Real Estate		$1,132	($414)	$14	$350	$1,082	$168
Construction & Land Dev		0	728	728	9,776	10,504
Commercial Real Estate		2,858	(180)	13	(245)	2,446	505
Agricultural Real Estate		0	116	116	82,097	82,213
Construction & Land Dev		1,163	0	0	673	1,836	1,030
Commercial		28	537	565	39,721	40,286
Agricultural Real Estate		198	0	0	162	360	0
Agricultural		8	0	8	28,802	28,810
Commercial		202	(6)	16	56	268	27
Consumer		11	164	175	10,362	10,537
Agricultural		263	0	0	35	298	0
	Total	$470	$3,220	$3,690	$300,904	$304,594
Consumer		150	(151)	11	11	21	0
Unallocated		612	0	0	(517)	95	0
Total		$6,578	($751)	$54	$525	$6,406	$1,730

		30-89 Days	90 Days	Total		Total Financing
							Ending Balance
	$(000)s	~~Past Due~~Beginning	~~& Over~~	~~Past Due~~	~~Current~~	~~Receivables~~Ending	Individually
	December 31, 2011
		Balance				Balance	Evaluated
Residential Real Estate		$1,319	$866	$2,185	$70,471	$72,656
2011		1/1/2011	Charge-offs	Recoveries	Provision	9/30/2011	for Impairment
Commercial Real Estate		1,103	1,074	2,177	58,688	60,865
Residential Real Estate		$1,429	($50)	$124	($125)	$1,378	$230
Construction & Land Dev		0	1,452	1,452	10,203	11,655
Commercial Real Estate		2,849	(461)	6	174	2,568	693
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	78,768	78,768
Construction & Land Dev		880	(225)	25	459	1,139	478
Commercial		185	200	385	34,793	35,178
Agricultural Real Estate		204	0	0	48	252	40
Agricultural		0	0	0	27,661	27,661
Commercial		278	(252)	40	173	239	52
Consumer		63	81	144	10,905	11,049
Agricultural		347	0	7	(131)	223	0
	Total	$2,670	$3,673	$6,343	$291,489	$297,832
Consumer		160	(15)	4	4	153	131
Unallocated		718	0	0	(152)	566	0
Total		$6,865	($1,003)	$206	$450	$6,518	$1,624

~~Credit~~Nonaccrual ~~Quality~~loans ~~Indicators~~totaled $6.2 million and $8.7 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. There were no loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing. A schedule of loans by the number of days past due (including nonaccrual loans) along with a schedule of credit quality indicators follows:

	$(000)s
	June 30, 2012	Non-Classified	Special Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Total
Residential Real Estate		$58,611	$5,373	$5,429	$2,122	$71,535
Commercial Real Estate		48,195	5,575	4,371	2,568	60,709
Construction & Land Dev		4,548	627	2,724	2,605	10,504
Agricultural Real Estate		76,668	5,545	0	0	82,213
Commercial		37,667	933	1,502	184	40,286
Agricultural		26,211	2,599	0	0	28,810
Consumer		10,252	78	44	163	10,537
Total		$262,152	$20,730	$14,070	$7,642	$304,594
	$(000)s
	December 31, 2011	Non-Classified	Special Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Total
Residential Real Estate		$58,960	$6,277	$6,501	$918	$72,656
Commercial Real Estate		49,547	3,668	4,787	2,863	60,865
Construction & Land Dev		4,691	898	4,154	1,912	11,655
Agricultural Real Estate		70,412	8,356	0	0	78,768
Commercial		32,600	1,250	1,164	164	35,178
Agricultural		23,779	3,882	0	0	27,661
Consumer		10,678	102	127	142	11,049
Total		$250,667	$24,433	$16,733	$5,999	$297,832

Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables

Modifications

		30-89 Days	90 Days	Total		Total Financing
	$(000)s	Past Due	& Over	Past Due	Current	Receivables

	September 30, 2012
Residential Real Estate		$929	$332	$1,261	$68,853	$70,114
Commercial Real Estate		127	681	808	58,282	59,090
Construction & Land Dev		0	714	714	12,591	13,305
Agricultural Real Estate		1,085	116	1,201	74,839	76,040
Commercial		8	360	368	40,640	41,008
Agricultural		90	0	90	33,343	33,433
Consumer		19	26	45	10,565	10,610

	Total	$2,258	$2,229	$4,487	$299,113	$303,600

As of June 30, 2012

		30-89 Days	90 Days	Total		Total Financing
	$(000)s	Past Due	& Over	Past Due	Current	Receivables

	December 31, 2011
Residential Real Estate		$1,319	$866	$2,185	$70,471	$72,656
Commercial Real Estate		1,103	1,074	2,177	58,688	60,865
Construction & Land Dev		0	1,452	1,452	10,203	11,655
Agricultural Real Estate		0	0	0	78,768	78,768
Commercial		185	200	385	34,793	35,178
Agricultural		0	0	0	27,661	27,661
Consumer		63	81	144	10,905	11,049

	Total	$2,670	$3,673	$6,343	$291,489	$297,832

			Pre-Modification	Post-Modification	Recorded	Impact to
	$(000)s	Number of	Recorded	Recorded	Investment	Allowance
		Contracts	Investment	Investment	as of 6/30/2012	for Credit Losses
Residential Real Estate		3	$177	$177	$176	$151

Credit Quality Indicators

Since December 31, 2011 there were no loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings that subsequently defaulted.

	$(000)s		Special
	September 30, 2012	Non-Classified	Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Total
Residential Real Estate		$57,241	$5,848	$5,280	$1,745	$70,114
Commercial Real Estate		48,261	5,703	2,725	2,401	59,090
Construction & Land Dev		7,106	931	2,712	2,556	13,305
Agricultural Real Estate		69,852	5,363	825	0	76,040
Commercial		37,313	2,383	1,132	180	41,008
Agricultural		30,884	2,549	0	0	33,433
Consumer		10,483	78	28	21	10,610
Total		$261,140	$22,855	$12,702	$6,903	$303,600

NOTE 4 - NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

	$(000)s		Special
	December 31, 2011	Non-Classified	Mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Total
Residential Real Estate		$58,960	$6,277	$6,501	$918	$72,656
Commercial Real Estate		49,547	3,668	4,787	2,863	60,865
Construction & Land Dev		4,691	898	4,154	1,912	11,655
Agricultural Real Estate		70,412	8,356	0	0	78,768
Commercial		32,600	1,250	1,164	164	35,178
Agricultural		23,779	3,882	0	0	27,661
Consumer		10,678	102	127	142	11,049
Total		$250,667	$24,433	$16,733	$5,999	$297,832

In April 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03 Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This update to Topic 860, "Transfers and Servicing," modifies the criteria for determining when repurchase agreements would be accounted for as a secured borrowing rather than a sale. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-03 remove from the assessment of effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. This update does not change the other existing criteria used in the assessment of effective control. ASU No. 2011-03 is effective prospectively for transactions, or modifications of existing transactions, that occur on or after January 1, 2012. These amendments did not have any impact on DBI's financial statements.Modifications

InAs May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. These amendments to Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement," result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). The changes to U.S. GAAP as a result of ~~ASU~~September No. 2011-04 are as follows; (a) the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets; (b) U.S. GAAP currently prohibits application of a blockage factor in valuing financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets30, however ASU No. 2011-04 extends that prohibition to all fair value measurements; (c) an exception is provided to the basic fair value measurement principles for an entity that holds a group of financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk that are managed on the basis of the entity's net exposure to either of those risks which allows the entity, if certain criteria are met, to measure the fair value of the net asset or liability position in a manner consistent with how market participants would price the net risk position; (d) aligns the fair value measurement of instruments classified within an entity's shareholders' equity with the guidance for liabilities; and (e) disclosure requirements have been enhanced for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements to disclose quantitative information about unobservable inputs and assumptions used, to describe the valuation processes used by the entity, and to describe the sensitivity of fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs. In addition, entities must report the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of condition but whose fair value must be disclosed. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 are effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. See Note 5 for the impact that the adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 had on DBI's financial statements.2012

In June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This update to Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income," allows an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The statement(s) are required to be presented with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders' equity but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive must be reclassified to net income. ASU No. 2011-05 is effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 changed the presentation of DBI's income statement and the addition of a statement of other comprehensive income. The adoption did not have any impact on DBI's statement of financial condition.

			Pre-Modification	Post-Modification	Recorded	Impact to
	$(000)s	Number of	Recorded	Recorded	Investment	Allowance
		Contracts	Investment	Investment	as of 9/30/2012	for Credit Losses
Residential Real Estate		5	$480	$354	$353	$254
Total		5	$480	$354	$353	$254

InSince ~~September~~December ~~2011~~31, ~~FASB issued ASU No.~~ 2011~~-08,~~ ~~Testing~~there ~~Goodwill~~were ~~for~~no ~~Impairment. This~~loans ~~update to Topic 350, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other," permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not~~ that ~~the~~were modified ~~fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount~~ as atroubled ~~basis~~debt ~~for~~restructurings determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Previous guidance under Topic 350 required an entity to test goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount (step one). If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the second step of the test must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under the amendments of this update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that itsubsequently ~~is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount~~defaulted. If after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. An entity has the option under this update to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption was permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-08 had no impact on DBI's financial statements.

NOTE 54 - ~~FAIR~~NEW ~~VALUE MEASURMENT~~ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

~~Fair~~In ~~value~~April is2011, ~~the~~FASB ~~exchange~~issued ~~price~~ASU ~~that~~No. ~~would~~2011-03 Reconsideration beof ~~received~~Effective Control for anRepurchase ~~asset~~Agreements. orThis update ~~paid~~ to ~~transfer~~Topic a860, ~~liability~~"Transfers inand ~~the~~Servicing," ~~principal~~modifies orthe ~~most advantageous market~~ criteria for ~~the~~determining ~~asset~~when orrepurchase ~~liability~~agreements inwould abe ~~transaction~~accounted ~~between~~for ~~market~~as ~~participants~~a onsecured borrowing ~~the~~rather ~~measurement~~than ~~date~~a sale. ~~Some~~ ~~assets~~The ~~and~~provisions ~~liabilities~~of ~~are~~ASU ~~measured~~No. on2011-03 aremove ~~recurring~~from ~~basis~~the assessment ~~while~~of ~~others~~effective ~~are~~control ~~measured~~the oncriterion arequiring ~~non-recurring~~the ~~basis,~~transferor asto ~~required~~have the byability ~~U.S.~~to ~~GAAP,~~repurchase ~~which~~or ~~also~~redeem ~~establishes~~the afinancial ~~fair~~assets ~~value~~on ~~hierarchy~~substantially ~~that~~the agreed ~~requires~~terms, aneven ~~entity~~in ~~to maximize~~ the ~~use~~event of ~~observable~~default ~~inputs~~by ~~and~~the ~~minimize~~transferee and the ~~use~~collateral maintenance ofimplementation ~~unobservable~~guidance ~~inputs~~related ~~when~~to ~~measuring~~that ~~fair value~~criterion. ~~Fair~~ ~~value~~This ~~estimates~~update ~~are~~does not ~~made~~change atthe aother ~~specific~~existing ~~point~~criteria used in ~~time~~the ~~based~~assessment onof ~~relevant~~effective control. ~~market~~ASU ~~information~~No. ~~and~~2011-03 ~~information~~is ~~about~~effective ~~the~~prospectively ~~financial~~for ~~instrument. The~~transactions, ~~three~~or modifications ~~levels~~ of ~~inputs~~existing ~~defined~~transactions, inthat ~~the~~occur ~~standard~~on ~~that~~or ~~may~~after beJanuary ~~used~~1, to2012. These ~~measure~~amendments ~~fair~~did ~~value~~not ~~are~~have asany ~~follows:~~impact on DBI's financial statements.

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. These amendments to Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement," result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS"). The changes to U.S. GAAP as a result of ASU No. 2011-04 are as follows; (a) the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets; (b) U.S. GAAP currently prohibits application of a blockage factor in valuing financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets, however ASU No. 2011-04 extends that prohibition to all fair value measurements; (c) an exception is provided to the basic fair value measurement principles for an entity that holds a group of financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk that are managed on the basis of the entity's net exposure to either of those risks which allows the entity, if certain criteria are met, to measure the fair value of the net asset or liability position in a manner consistent with how market participants would price the net risk position; (d) aligns the fair value measurement of instruments classified within an entity's shareholders' equity with the guidance for liabilities; and (e) disclosure requirements have been enhanced for recurring Level 1:3 fair value measurements to disclose quantitative information about unobservable inputs and assumptions used, to describe the valuation processes used by the entity, and to describe the sensitivity of fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs. In addition, entities must report the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of condition but whose fair value must be disclosed. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 are effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. See Note 5 for the impact that the adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 had on DBI's financial statements.

~~Level~~In 2:June 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This update to Topic 220, "Comprehensive Income," allows an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The statement(s) are required to be presented with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders' equity but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive must be reclassified to net income. ASU No. 2011-05 is effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 changed the presentation of DBI's income statement and the addition of a statement of other comprehensive income. The adoption did not have any impact on DBI's statement of financial condition.

~~Level~~In 3:September 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. This update to Topic 350, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other," permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Previous guidance under Topic 350 required an entity to test goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount (step one). If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the second step of the test must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under the amendments of this update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. If after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. An entity has the option under this update to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption was permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-08 had no impact on DBI's financial statements.

In July 2012, FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. The provisions of this update permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test, as is currently required by GAAP. ASU No. 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Since DBI ~~used~~does not have any indefinite-lived intangible asses, the ~~following~~adoption ~~methods~~of ~~and~~ASU ~~significant~~No. ~~assumptions~~2012-02 is not anticipated to ~~estimate~~have ~~fair~~any ~~value:~~impacted on DBI's financial statements.

~~Cash,~~NOTE ~~Cash~~5 ~~Equivalents,~~- ~~and~~FAIR ~~Federal Funds Sold:~~VALUE MEASURMENT

~~Investment~~Fair ~~Securities:~~value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in a transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Some assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis, as required by U.S. GAAP, which also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. The three levels of inputs defined in the standard that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

~~Refer~~Level to1: ~~Note~~Quoted 2prices ~~- Investment Securities~~ for ~~additional~~identical ~~detail~~assets or onliabilities ~~the~~in ~~assumptions~~active ~~used~~markets inthat ~~determining~~ the ~~estimated~~entity ~~fair~~has ~~values,~~ the ~~valuation~~ability ~~techniques~~to ~~and~~access ~~significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets~~ as of ~~well~~the asmeasurement ~~additional disclosures regarding DBI's investment securities~~date. For other securities held as investments, fair value equals quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

~~Loans~~Level ~~Receivable~~2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, ~~net:~~such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

~~Loans~~Level ~~Held~~3: ~~for~~Significant ~~Sale:~~unobservable inputs that are supported by little, if any, market activity. These unobservable inputs reflect estimates that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liability.

~~Impaired~~DBI ~~Loans:~~used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:

~~Other~~Cash, ~~Investments~~Cash Equivalents, and Federal Funds Sold:

~~Other~~For ~~Real~~cash, ~~Estate~~cash ~~Owned:~~equivalents and federal funds sold, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

~~Bank~~Investment ~~Owned Life Insurance~~Securities:

~~Deposit~~Investment ~~Liabilities:~~securities available-for-sale ("AFS") are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value measurement of most of DBI's AFS securities is currently determined by an independent provider using Level 2 inputs (except as noted below). The measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar assets, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using matrix pricing models, or other model-based valuation techniques requiring observable inputs other than quoted prices such as yield curves, prepayment speed and default rates. Two of DBI's AFS MBS that are secured by non-traditional mortgage loans and one AFS MBS secured by traditional mortgage loans that was previously downgraded were analyzed by a third party in order to determine an estimated fair value. The estimated fair values were based on discounted cash flow analyses and are considered Level 3 inputs.

~~Borrowings:~~Refer to Note 2 - Investment Securities for additional detail on the assumptions used in determining the estimated fair values, the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets as well as additional disclosures regarding DBI's investment securities. For other securities held as investments, fair value equals quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

~~Commitments~~Loans ~~to Extend Credit~~Receivable, ~~Standby Letters of Credit and Financial Guarantees Written~~net:

~~Assets~~The ~~Recorded~~fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at ~~Fair~~which ~~Value~~similar loans onwould abe ~~Recurring~~made ~~Basis~~to borrowers with similar characteristics and for the same remaining maturities.

~~Assets~~Loans ~~measured~~Held atfor ~~fair value on a recurring basis, are summarized in the table below~~Sale:

Mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market value. The fair value is based on a market commitment for the sale of the loan in the secondary market. These loans are typically sold within one week of funding. DBI classifies mortgage loans held for sale as nonrecurring Level 2 assets.

	June 30, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$3,497,500	$0	$3,497,500
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	0	40,637,232	0	40,637,232
State and local governments	0	28,155,696	0	28,155,696
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	2,120,204	3,620,368	5,740,572
Total securities available for sale	$0	$74,410,632	$3,620,368	$78,031,000
	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$3,517,050	$0	$3,517,050
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	0	32,226,529	0	32,226,529
State and local governments	0	25,468,499	0	25,468,499
Residential mortgage-backed securities	0	2,355,680	4,042,935	6,398,615
Total securities available for sale	$0	$63,567,758	$4,042,935	$67,610,693

Impaired Loans:

~~The~~As ~~table~~defined below ~~presents~~in the Glossary of Loan Terms section, a ~~reconciliation~~loan ~~and~~is ~~income~~considered ~~statement~~impaired ~~classification~~when, based on current information or events, it is probable that not all amounts due will be collected according to the contractual terms of ~~gains~~the loan agreement. Impairment is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. The collateral value is determined based on appraisals and ~~losses~~other market valuations for ~~all~~similar assets. ~~measured~~Under atFASB ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," the fair value of impaired loans is reported before selling costs of the related collateral, while FASB ASC Topic 310, "Receivables," requires that impaired loans be reported on athe ~~recurring~~balance ~~basis~~sheet ~~using~~net of estimated selling costs. Therefore, significant ~~unobservable~~estimated ~~(Level~~selling 3)costs would result in the reported fair value of impaired loans being greater than the measurement value of impaired loans as maintained on the balance sheet. In most instances, selling costs were estimated for real estate-secured collateral and included broker commissions, legal and title transfer fees and closing costs. Given the ~~six~~valuation ~~months~~technique ~~ended~~and ~~June~~significant 30unobservable inputs utilized to determine the fair value, ~~2012~~impaired loans are classified as nonrecurring Level 3 assets.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
			Available-
			for-Sale
			Securities
Beginning balance, January 1, 2012			$4,042,935
Total realized and unrealized gains/(losses):
Included in earnings			(77,185)
Included in other comprehensive income			25,766
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements
Purchases			0
Issuances			0
Sales			0
Settlements			(371,148)
Transfers into Level 3			0
Transfers out of Level 3			0
Ending balance, June 30, 2012			$3,620,368

Other Investments:

~~Assets~~For ~~Recorded~~other atinvestments, ~~Fair~~the ~~Value~~carrying onamount is a ~~Nonrecurring~~reasonable ~~Basis~~estimate of fair value.

~~Assets~~Other ~~measured~~Real atEstate ~~fair value on a nonrecurring basis, are summarized in the following table~~Owned:

	June 30, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
Loans held for sale	$0	$446,865	$0	$446,865
Other real estate owned	0	438,955	0	438,955
Impaired loans	0	0	11,544,977	11,544,977
Total Assets	$0	$885,820	$11,544,977	$12,430,797
	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
Loans held for sale	$0	$485,926	$0	$485,926
Other real estate owned	0	801,689	0	801,689
Impaired loans	0	0	13,260,619	13,260,619
Total Assets	$0	$1,287,615	$13,260,619	$14,548,234

Real estate that DBI has taken control of in partial or full satisfaction of debt is valued at the lower of book value or fair value. The fair value is determined by analyzing the collateral value of the real estate using appraisals and other market valuations for similar assets less any estimated selling costs. The value carried on the balance sheet for other real estate owned is estimated fair value of the properties. Other real estate owned is classified as a nonrecurring Level 2 asset.

~~The~~Bank ~~tables~~Owned ~~below~~Life ~~summarize fair value of financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.~~Insurance:

	June 30, 2012
	Carrying	Fair	Fair Value Hierarchy Level
	Amount	Value	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and federal funds sold	$22,426	$22,426	$22,426	$0	$0
Investment securities	78,031	78,031	0	74,411	3,620
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	298,009	296,549	0	0	296,549
Loans held for sale	447	447	0	447	0
Bank owned life insurance	7,217	7,217	0	7,217	0
Other investments, at cost	2,741	2,741	0	0	2,741
TOTAL	$408,871	$407,411	$22,426	$82,075	$302,910
Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$324,367	$325,732	$0	$0	$325,732
Borrowings	38,151	40,255	0	0	40,255
TOTAL	$362,518	$365,987	$0	$0	$365,987
	December 31, 2011
	Carrying	Fair	Fair Value Hierarchy Level
	Amount	Value	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
(In thousands)
Financial Assets
Cash and federal funds sold	$42,093	$42,093	$42,093	$0	$0
Investment securities	67,611	67,611	0	63,568	4,043
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	291,254	291,427	0	0	291,427
Loans held for sale	486	486	0	486	0
Bank owned life insurance	7,083	7,083	0	7,083	0
Other investments, at cost	4,405	4,405	0	0	4,405
TOTAL	$412,932	$413,105	$42,093	$71,137	$299,875
Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$327,793	$328,864	$0	$0	$328,864
Borrowings	40,041	41,935	0	0	41,935
TOTAL	$367,834	$370,799	$0	$0	$370,799

The carrying amount of bank owned life insurance approximates fair value.

~~Item~~Deposit ~~2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~Liabilities:

Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited)
Financial Highlights
	2nd Qtr	1st Qtr	4th Qtr	3rd Qtr	2nd Qtr
(In thousands, except per share data)	2012	2012	2011	2011	2011
Operating Results
Interest income	$4,360	$4,305	$4,340	$4,406	$4,512
Interest expense	847	896	946	1,003	1,052
Net interest income	3,513	3,409	3,394	3,403	3,460
Provision for credit losses	150	150	150	150	150
Noninterest income	505	596	539	484	509
Noninterest expense	2,621	2,572	2,328	2,514	2,567
Net income	821	849	982	848	868
Per Share Data
Net income per share	$6.93	$7.14	$8.26	$7.13	$7.30
Book value per share	$480.21	$479.09	$471.11	$470.88	$462.89
Financial Condition (1)
Total Loans	$304,594	$301,606	$297,832	$295,511	$293,855
Allowance for loan losses	6,585	6,603	6,578	6,518	6,388
Investment securities	78,031	76,787	67,611	65,757	68,547
Assets	421,540	422,731	425,986	412,560	410,023
Deposits	324,367	324,922	327,793	315,232	310,210
Other borrowed funds	38,151	39,683	40,041	39,759	42,609
Stockholders' equity	56,938	56,804	56,023	55,996	55,045
Financial Ratios
Return on average equity	5.77%	5.99%	7.14%	6.20%	6.41%
Return on average assets	0.79%	0.80%	0.96%	0.83%	0.85%
Interest rate spread	3.33%	3.17%	3.37%	3.29%	3.33%
Average equity to average assets	13.60%	13.39%	13.23%	13.37%	13.22%
Allowance for loan losses
to total loans (1)	2.16%	2.19%	2.21%	2.21%	2.17%
Non-performing loans to allowance for
loan losses (1)	109%	137%	132%	125%	112%
(1) As of the period ending.

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is the estimate of discounted cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

~~Forward~~Borrowings: ~~Looking Statements~~

~~This~~Rates ~~report~~currently ~~may~~available contain certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation, statements regarding results of operations, the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses, the amounts of charge-offs and recoveries, capital to ~~asset~~DSB ~~ratios, capacity~~ for ~~paying~~debt with ~~dividends and liquidity. These statements speak of DBI's plans, goals, beliefs or expectations, and refer to estimates or use of~~ similar terms~~. Forward-looking~~ ~~statements can generally be identified because they contain words~~ and ~~phrases~~remaining ~~such~~maturities ~~as "may," "project," "~~are ~~confident,"~~used ~~"should,"~~to ~~"predict," "believe," "plan," "expect," "~~estimate," ~~"anticipate,"~~fair ~~and~~value similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual results may differ from DBI's expectations. The factors that, among others, could impact current and future performance include but are not limited to: (i) adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses; (ii) adverse changes in the local economy; (iii) fluctuations in market rates and prices which can negatively affect net interest margin, asset valuations and expense expectations; (iv) changes in regulatory requirements of existing federal and state agencies applicable to banks and bank holding companies; and (v) the factors set forth in Item 1A of DBI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the "2011 Annual Report"), which item is incorporated herein by reference, as well as other risks identified in this Reportdebt. When reviewing forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to DBI, investors and others are cautioned to consider these and other risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements contained in this report are based upon information presently available and DBI assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

~~The~~Commitments ~~Dodd-Frank~~to ~~Wall~~Extend ~~Street~~Credit, ~~Reform~~Standby Letters of Credit and ~~Consumer~~Financial ~~Protection~~Guarantees ~~Act~~Written:

OnThe ~~July~~fair ~~21,~~value ~~2010,~~of ~~President~~commitments ~~Obama~~is ~~signed~~estimated using the ~~Dodd-Frank~~fees ~~Wall~~currently ~~Street~~charged ~~Reform~~to ~~and~~enter ~~Consumer~~into ~~Protection~~similar ~~Act~~agreements, ~~("Dodd-Frank~~taking ~~Act")~~ into account ~~law. This~~the ~~legislation~~remaining ~~makes~~terms ~~extensive~~of ~~changes to~~ the ~~laws~~agreements ~~regulating financial services firms~~ and ~~requires significant rulemaking. In addition,~~ the ~~legislation~~present ~~mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action. While the full effects~~ creditworthiness of the ~~legislation~~counterparties. onFor ~~DBI~~fixed ~~and~~rate ~~DSB~~loan ~~cannot yet be determined~~commitments, ~~this~~fair ~~legislation~~value isalso considers ~~generally perceived as negatively impacting~~ the ~~banking~~difference ~~industry. This~~between ~~legislation~~current ~~may~~levels ~~result~~of ininterest ~~higher~~rates ~~compliance~~ and ~~other~~the committed ~~costs,~~rates. ~~reduced~~The ~~revenues~~fair ~~and~~value ~~higher~~of ~~capital~~guarantees and ~~liquidity~~letters ~~requirements,~~of ~~among~~credit ~~other~~is ~~things, which could adversely affect DBI's and DSB's business~~not material.

~~Critical~~Assets ~~Accounting~~Recorded ~~Policies~~at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

~~The~~Assets ~~accounting~~measured and reporting policies of DBI are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to general practices in the banking industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at ~~the~~fair ~~date~~value ~~of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based~~ on ~~information available at the date of the financial statements. Certain policies inherently have~~ a ~~greater reliance on the use of estimates~~recurring basis, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Management believes that DBI's critical accounting policies are ~~those~~summarized ~~relating~~in to the ~~allowance~~table ~~for loan losses, the valuation of investment securities and intangible assets.~~below:

Allowance for Loan Losses

	September 30, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$4,511,200	$0	$4,511,200
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	0	40,112,809	0	40,112,809
State and local governments	0	28,616,198	0	28,616,198
Asset-backed securities	0	2,455,750	0	2,455,750
Residential MBS	0	2,047,348	3,598,225	5,645,573
Total securities available for sale	$0	$77,743,305	$3,598,225	$81,341,530

The allowance for loan losses ("ALL") is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. Please refer to the Allowance for Loan Losses section of Note 3 - Loans for detail on the allowance methodology. Management believes the ALL is appropriate as of June 30, 2012.

	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
U.S. Government-sponsored agencies	$0	$3,517,050	$0	$3,517,050
U.S. Government-sponsored agency MBS	0	32,226,529	0	32,226,529
State and local governments	0	25,468,499	0	25,468,499
Residential MBS	0	2,355,680	4,042,935	6,398,615
Total securities available for sale	$0	$63,567,758	$4,042,935	$67,610,693

~~Valuation~~The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of ~~Investment~~gains ~~Securities~~and losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Investment securities are classified as available-for-sale and are valued at their fair market value. Please refer to Note 2 - Investment Securities and Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement for additional details on the valuation of investment securities.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

			Available-
			for-Sale
			Securities
Beginning balance, January 1, 2012			$4,042,935
Total realized and unrealized gains/(losses):
Included in earnings			(120,354)
Included in other comprehensive income			194,999
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements
Purchases			0
Issuances			0
Sales			0
Settlements			(519,355)
Transfers into Level 3			0
Transfers out of Level 3			0
Ending balance, September 30, 2012			$3,598,225

~~Other~~Assets ~~Real~~Recorded ~~Estate~~at ~~Owned~~Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

~~Real~~Assets ~~estate~~measured ~~that DBI has taken control of in partial or full satisfaction of debt is valued~~ at ~~the~~fair ~~lower of book~~ value ~~or market value. Please refer to Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement for additional information~~ on ~~the~~a nonrecurring ~~accounting~~basis, ~~polices~~are ~~related~~summarized toin the ~~valuation~~following ~~of other real estate owned.~~table:

Glossary of Loan Terms

	September 30, 2012
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
Loans held for sale	$0	$367,806	$0	$367,806
Other real estate owned	0	336,719	0	336,719
Impaired loans	0	0	10,634,032	10,634,032
Total Assets	$0	$704,525	$10,634,032	$11,338,557

Impaired Loan -

	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements Using
Description	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Fair Value
Loans held for sale	$0	$485,926	$0	$485,926
Other real estate owned	0	801,689	0	801,689
Impaired loans	0	0	13,260,619	13,260,619
Total Assets	$0	$1,287,615	$13,260,619	$14,548,234

~~Nonaccrual~~The ~~Loan~~tables -below summarize fair value of financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Non-Performing Assets -

	September 30, 2012
	Carrying	Fair	Fair Value Hierarchy Level
	Amount	Value	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
$(000s)
*Financial Assets*
Cash and federal funds sold	$29,118	$29,118	$29,118	$0	$0
Investment securities	81,341	81,341	0	77,743	3,598
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	297,194	298,277	0	0	298,277
Loans held for sale	368	368	0	368	0
Bank owned life insurance	7,286	7,286	0	7,286	0
Other investments, at cost	2,741	2,741	0	0	2,741
TOTAL	$418,048	$419,131	$29,118	$85,397	$304,616
*Financial Liabilities*
Deposits	$332,898	$334,074	$0	$0	$334,074
Borrowings	37,768	39,873	0	0	39,873
TOTAL	$370,666	$373,947	$0	$0	$373,947

Past Due Accruing Loans -

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying	Fair	Fair Value Hierarchy Level
	Amount	Value	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3
$(000s)
*Financial Assets*
Cash and federal funds sold	$42,093	$42,093	$42,093	$0	$0
Investment securities	67,611	67,611	0	63,568	4,043
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	291,254	291,427	0	0	291,427
Loans held for sale	486	486	0	486	0
Bank owned life insurance	7,083	7,083	0	7,083	0
Other investments, at cost	4,405	4,405	0	0	4,405
TOTAL	$412,932	$413,105	$42,093	$71,137	$299,875
*Financial Liabilities*
Deposits	$327,793	$328,864	$0	$0	$328,864
Borrowings	40,041	41,935	0	0	41,935
TOTAL	$367,834	$370,799	$0	$0	$370,799

~~Potential~~Item ~~Problem~~2. ~~Loans~~Management's -Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Restructured Loans -

*Denmark Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries*
*Selected Quarterly Financial Data*
(Unaudited)

Financial Highlights
	3rd Qtr	2nd Qtr	1st Qtr	4th Qtr	3rd Qtr
($000s, except per share data)	2012	2012	2012	2011	2011

Operating Results
Interest income	$4,292	$4,360	$4,305	$4,340	$4,406
Interest expense	784	847	896	946	1,003
Net interest income	3,508	3,513	3,409	3,394	3,403
Provision for loan losses	225	150	150	150	150
Noninterest income	830	505	596	539	484
Noninterest expense	2,604	2,621	2,572	2,328	2,514
Net income	974	821	849	982	848

Per Share Data
Net income per share	$8.22	$6.93	$7.14	$8.26	$7.13
Book value per share	$489.67	$480.21	$479.09	$471.11	$470.88

Financial Condition (1)
Total Loans	$303,600	$304,594	$301,606	$297,832	$295,511
Allowance for credit losses	6,406	6,585	6,603	6,578	6,518
Investment securities	81,342	78,031	76,787	67,611	65,757
Assets	430,156	421,540	422,731	425,986	412,560
Deposits	332,898	324,367	324,922	327,793	315,232
Other borrowed funds	37,768	38,151	39,683	40,041	39,759
Stockholders' equity	58,059	56,938	56,804	56,023	55,996

Financial Ratios
Return on average equity	6.77%	5.77%	5.99%	7.14%	6.20%
Return on average assets	0.93%	0.79%	0.80%	0.96%	0.83%
Interest rate spread	3.33%	3.33%	3.17%	3.37%	3.29%
Average equity to average assets	13.67%	13.60%	13.39%	13.23%	13.37%
Allowance for loan losses
to total loans (1)	2.11%	2.16%	2.19%	2.21%	2.21%
Non-performing loans to allowance for
loan losses (1)	96%	109%	137%	132%	125%
(1) As of the period ending.

~~Risk~~Forward ~~Rating~~Looking - Statements

~~Special~~This ~~Mention~~report ~~Loans~~may contain certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation, statements regarding results of operations, the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses, the amounts of charge-offs and recoveries, capital to asset ratios, capacity for paying dividends and liquidity. These statements speak of DBI's plans, goals, beliefs or expectations, and refer to estimates or use of similar terms. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified because they contain words and phrases such as "may," "project," "are confident," "should," "predict," "believe," "plan," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual results may differ from DBI's expectations. The factors that, among others, could impact current and future performance include but are not limited to: (i) adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses; (ii) adverse changes in the local economy; (iii) fluctuations in market rates and prices which can negatively affect net interest margin, asset valuations and expense expectations; (iv) changes in regulatory requirements of federal and state agencies applicable to banks and bank holding companies; and (v) the factors set forth in Item 1A of DBI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the "2011 Annual Report"), which item is incorporated herein by reference, as well as other risks identified in this Report. When reviewing forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to DBI, investors and others are cautioned to consider these and other risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements contained in this report are based upon information presently available and DBI assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

~~Substandard~~The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

~~Results~~On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act") into law. This legislation makes extensive changes to the laws regulating financial services firms and requires significant rulemaking, some of ~~Operations~~which has yet to be finalized. In addition, the legislation mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional legislative or regulatory action. While the full effects of the legislation on DBI and DSB cannot yet be determined, this legislation is generally perceived as negatively impacting the banking industry. This legislation may result in higher compliance and other costs, reduced revenues and higher capital and liquidity requirements, among other things, which could adversely affect DBI's and DSB's business.

~~Net~~Critical ~~income~~Accounting for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, was $0.8 million, a decline of $0.1 million or 5.4% from $0.9 million for the corresponding period in 2011. This decrease was primarily the result of a $0.1 million increase in salaries and employee benefits from the same period during 2011.Policies

~~Year-~~The accounting and reporting policies of DBI are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and conform to~~-date~~ ~~net~~general ~~income~~practices ~~for~~in the ~~first~~banking ~~six~~industry. ~~months~~The preparation of ~~2012~~financial ~~was~~statements ~~$1.7~~in ~~million,~~conformity awith ~~decline~~these ofprinciples requires ~~$0.1~~management ~~million~~to ormake ~~6.2%~~estimates ~~from~~and ~~$1.8~~assumptions ~~million~~that ~~for~~affect the ~~comparable~~reported amounts ~~period~~of inassets ~~2011. An~~and ~~increase~~liabilities inat ~~salaries~~the date of the financial statements, and the ~~employee~~reported ~~benefits~~amounts of $0revenues and expenses during the reporting period.2 These ~~million,~~estimates ~~partially~~and ~~offset~~assumptions byare anbased ~~increase~~on information available at the date of $0the financial statements.1 ~~million~~Certain inpolicies ~~gain~~inherently have a greater reliance on ~~sale~~the use of ~~loans~~estimates, ~~were~~assumptions, ~~the~~and ~~primary~~judgments ~~factors~~and inas ~~the~~such ~~decline~~have ~~for~~a greater ~~the~~possibility ~~first~~of ~~half~~producing ofresults ~~2012~~that ~~compared~~could be materially different than originally reported. Management believes that DBI's critical accounting policies are those relating to the ~~same~~allowance ~~period~~for inloan ~~2011~~losses, the valuation of investment securities and intangible assets.

~~Net~~Allowance ~~interest income~~ for ~~the~~Loan quarter ended June 30, 2012 was relatively stable at $3.5 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Net interest income for the first six months of 2012 was $6.9 million, a $0.1 million or 0.8% decline from $7.0 million recognized during the same period in 2011. The following tables set forth a summary of the changes in average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as well as the amount of interest earned and interest paid with the resulting average yield or rate for both the current quarter and year-to-date:Losses

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
($000s)	Average	Income	Average	Average	Income	Average
	Daily	and	Yield or	Daily	and	Yield or
	Balance	Expense	Rate	Balance	Expense	Rate
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1) (2)	$302,162	$3,851	5.10%	$297,894	$3,940	5.29%
Investment securities: (3)
Taxable securities	62,150	300	1.93%	46,775	302	2.59%
Nontaxable securities (2)	15,193	279	7.36%	21,082	381	7.23%
Federal funds sold	6,913	3	0.14%	9,787	4	0.14%
Other investments	10,777	26	0.96%	8,966	19	0.86%
Total earning assets	$397,195	$4,459	4.49%	$384,504	$4,646	4.83%
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$21,215	$10	0.19%	$19,597	$9	0.19%
Savings accounts	22,776	17	0.30%	21,098	16	0.30%
Money market accounts	133,466	185	0.55%	119,334	225	0.75%
Time deposits	104,038	377	1.45%	115,722	520	1.80%
Other borrowed funds	39,111	257	2.63%	44,008	283	2.57%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$320,606	$846	1.06%	$319,759	$1,053	1.32%
Net interest income and rate spread		$3,613	3.43%		$3,593	3.51%
Net yield on interest earning assets			3.64%			3.74%

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
($000s)	Average	Income	Average	Average	Income	Average
	Daily	and	Yield or	Daily	and	Yield or
	Balance	Expense	Rate	Balance	Expense	Rate
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1) (2)	$301,029	$7,641	5.08%	$298,294	$7,932	5.32%
Investment securities: (3)
Taxable securities	59,476	578	1.94%	42,859	547	2.55%
Nontaxable securities (2)	15,363	574	7.47%	23,154	873	7.54%
Federal funds sold	10,270	7	0.14%	13,025	11	0.17%
Other investments	14,453	67	0.93%	10,789	73	1.35%
Total earning assets	$400,591	$8,867	4.43%	$388,121	$9,436	4.86%
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$21,878	$20	0.18%	$21,018	$20	0.19%
Savings accounts	22,048	33	0.30%	20,576	34	0.33%
Money market accounts	135,691	397	0.59%	119,032	465	0.78%
Time deposits	104,587	774	1.48%	116,988	1,074	1.84%
Other borrowed funds	39,392	519	2.63%	44,007	563	2.56%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$323,596	$1,743	1.08%	$321,621	$2,156	1.34%
Net interest income and rate spread		$7,124	3.35%		$7,280	3.52%
Net yield on interest earning assets			3.56%			3.75%

Valuation of Investment Securities

~~(1)~~Investment ~~Nonaccrual~~securities ~~loans~~are classified as available-for-sale and are ~~included~~valued inat ~~the~~their ~~average~~fair ~~daily~~market ~~balance~~value. ~~figure,~~Please ~~but~~refer ~~interest~~to Note ~~income~~2 ~~associated~~- ~~with~~Investment ~~these~~Securities ~~loans~~and isNote ~~recognized~~5 ~~under~~- ~~the~~Fair ~~cash~~Value ~~basis~~Measurement ~~method~~for additional details on the valuation of ~~accounting~~investment securities.

~~(2)~~Other ~~The~~Real ~~yield~~Estate ~~on tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a fully taxable equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 34%.~~Owned

~~(3)~~Real ~~Securities~~estate ~~are~~that ~~shown~~DBI has taken control of in partial or full satisfaction of debt is valued at ~~amortized~~the ~~cost~~lower of book value or market value. Please refer to Note 5 - Fair Value Measurement for additional information on the accounting polices related to the valuation of other real estate owned.

~~The~~Glossary decline in net interest income for the quarter-ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to a 66 basis point decline in the yield on taxable securities along with a $5.9 million decline in the average balance of ~~tax-exempt~~Loan municipal securities. The net interest rate spread on a tax equivalent basis declined 8 basis points during this period from 3.51% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to 3.43% for the most recent quarter. DBI's yield on earning assets declined 34 basis points from 4.83% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to 4.49% as of the quarter ended June 30, 2012. The reduction in the yield on earning assets was partially offset by a decline in the cost of funds of 26 basis points from 1.32% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to 1.06% during the second quarter of 2012. This reduction in the cost of funds was primarily impacted by a 35 basis point reduction in the rate and $11.7 million decline in average balances on certificates of deposits.Terms

~~During~~Impaired ~~the~~Loan first six months of 2012, net interest income declined due in large part to a 61 basis point reduction in the yield on taxable securities along with a $7.8 million decrease in the average balance of tax-~~exempt~~ municipal securities. The net interest rate spread on a tax equivalent basis fell 17 basis points compared to the first six months of the prior year from 3.52% at June 30, 2011 to 3.35% at June 30, 2012. The yield on earning assets fell 43 basis points during this period from 4.86% in 2011 to 4.43% in 2012 due in large part to a 24 basis point decline in the yield on loans during this same period. This decline in the yield on earning assets was partially offset by a decrease in the cost of funds of 26 basis points from 1.34% year-to-date 2011 to 1.08% for the same period in 2012. The reduction in the cost of funds was primarily impacted by a 36 basis point reduction in the rate and a $12.4 million decline in the average balances on certificates of deposits.

A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that not all amounts due will be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured at the estimated fair value of the collateral. If the estimated fair value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized by creating a valuation allowance.

~~For~~Nonaccrual ~~each~~Loan ~~of the second quarters of 2012 and 2011, DBI's provision for credit losses was $0.2 million. Net charge~~-~~offs~~ of $0.2 million were recognized in the second quarter of 2012 compared to net charge-offs of $0.5 million during the corresponding period in 2011. For each of the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, DBI's provision for loan losses totaled $0.3 million. Net charge-offs for the current six-month period totaled $0.3 million versus $0.8 million for the comparable period in 2011.

DSB's policy is to place in nonaccrual status all loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to any payment of principal or interest and all other loans for which reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal based on management's view of the financial condition of the borrower. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the collection of principal is probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of management, the loans are estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest.

~~Noninterest~~Non-Performing ~~income~~Assets for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was stable at $0.5 million compared to the corresponding period in 2011. During the second quarter of 2012, gains on the sale of loans to the secondary market were $0.1 million higher than the same period for 2011. This is due to an increase in the volume of loans sold of $4.4 million to $7.5 million. This improvement was offset by declines in the other noninterest income categories. Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $1.1 million an increase of $0.1 million or 10.1% versus $1.0 million recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2011. This was primarily due to increases of $0.1 million in both service fees and commissions and gains on the sale of loans during the first half of 2012 compared to the first half of 2011. The increase in service fees and commissions is the result of a bonus insurance commission payment of $0.1 million from DSB's credit-~~life~~ ~~insurance carrier that was paid during March 2012. The bonus was paid as compensation for insurance policy sales levels realized in recent years and it will not be a recurring payment.~~

Non-performing assets include nonaccrual loans as defined above and real and personal properties acquired in satisfaction of debts previously owed.

~~Noninterest~~Past ~~expense~~Due ~~increased~~Accruing ~~$0.1~~Loans million or 3.6% to $2.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to $2.5 million for the second quarter of 2011. An increase in salaries and employee benefits of $0.1 million when comparing the current quarter with the same period of 2011 is the primary reason for this increase. Higher health insurance costs along with additional staffing led to this increase. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, noninterest expense increased $0.1 million or 1.5% to $5.1 million compared to $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Salaries and employee benefits were $0.2 million higher during the first half of 2012 when compared to the same period for 2011. In addition to higher health insurance costs and staffing, there was an accrual adjustment made during the first quarter of 2011 to correct an over-~~accrual~~ for 2010 bonuses. This adjustment was not repeated during 2012. A decline of $0.1 million in FDIC insurance premiums for the first six months of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011 partially offset the increase in salaries and employee benefit costs. The lower FDIC insurance premiums resulted from a new premium structure implemented by the FDIC effective April 1, 2011.

A loan on which all or part of a scheduled payment is delinquent by more than 30 days but less than 90 days, except loans that are considered nonaccrual.

~~Additional~~Potential ~~OTTI~~Problem ~~credit~~Loans ~~loss was recognized during the most recent quarter on the two securities previously determined to be other~~-~~than-temporarily-impaired. The~~ credit loss recognized through the income statement was $44,310 during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $80,353 recognized during the second quarter of 2011 on one of the two securities. For both the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, OTTI credit losses recognized on two securities previously determined to be other-than-temporarily-impaired totaled $0.1 million.

Potential problem loans are accruing loans in which there exists doubt as to the ability of the borrower to comply with present loan repayment terms. Management's decision to place loans in this category does not necessarily mean that DBI expects losses to occur on these loans, but that management recognizes that a higher degree of risk is associated with these accruing loans and they deserve closer scrutiny.

~~For~~Restructured ~~both~~Loans ~~the~~- three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, DBI recorded combined federal and state income tax expense of $0.4 million. These provisions reflect effective income tax rates of 34% for the second quarter of 2012 and 31% for the second quarter of 2011. DBI's combined statutory tax rate is 39%. The lower effective income tax rates are primarily due to certain federally tax exempt interest earned on state and local government investment securities. The effective tax rates for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were 34% and 30%, respectively.

Restructured loans involve the granting of some concession to the borrower involving the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in the payment schedule, the amortization term, the interest rate, or a combination of these.

~~Financial~~Risk ~~Condition~~Rating -

Risk rating, which is also sometimes referred to as loan grade, is the credit quality grade assigned to each loan. Loans are assigned a risk rating upon origination. Lenders and credit review analysts conduct periodic reviews and evaluations and make adjustments to the assigned grades when appropriate. The range of categories from the best quality to the worst is as follows: highest quality, solid quality, some weakness, inherent industry weakness, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Impaired loans are generally rated a substandard or lower risk rating.

~~Total~~Special ~~assets~~Mention ~~decreased~~Loans by- $4.4 million between December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012. Cash, cash equivalents and fed funds sold decreased by $19.7 million since December 31, 2011, while other investments declined $1.7 million during the same period. Increases in investment securities of $10.4 million and loans of $6.8 million during the first half of 2012 partially offset these declines.

Loans classified "special mention" are one step above substandard loans as described below. These loans contain some weaknesses, which if not corrected or improved upon could lead to further deterioration and a lower rating.

~~The~~Substandard ~~following~~- ~~table sets forth major types of loans, excluding loans held for sale, by primary collateral and the percentage of total loans for each type:~~

A "substandard" loan is a loan that is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or the value of the collateral. Loans classified "substandard" have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize prospects for liquidation and are characterized by the distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the deficiencies are not corrected.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
$(000)s	Amount	%	Amount	%
Real Estate:
Residential	$71,535	23.5%	$72,656	24.4%
Commercial	60,709	19.9%	60,865	20.4%
Agricultural	82,213	27.0%	78,768	26.5%
Construction	10,504	3.4%	11,655	3.9%
	$224,961	73.8%	$223,944	75.2%
Commercial	40,286	13.2%	35,178	11.8%
Agricultural	28,810	9.5%	27,661	9.3%
Consumer and other	10,537	3.5%	11,049	3.7%
TOTAL	$304,594	100.0%	$297,832	100.0%

Results of Operations

~~During~~Net ~~2011,~~income ~~management~~for ~~made~~ the ~~decision~~quarter toended ~~purchase~~September 30, ~~government~~2012, ~~guaranteed~~was ~~loans~~$1.0 ~~given~~million, ~~the~~an ~~lack~~increase of ~~quality~~$0.1 ~~loan~~million ~~growth~~or ~~potential~~14.9% ~~currently~~from ~~available~~$0.9 million ~~within~~for ~~DSB's~~the ~~lending~~corresponding ~~market. As~~period ofin ~~June~~2011. ~~30,~~This ~~2012~~increase ~~there~~was ~~were~~primarily ~~approximately~~the result of $130.92 million ofsecurity ~~government~~sales ~~guaranteed loans recorded~~gains, ofa ~~which~~ $100.21 million ~~are~~increase ~~secured~~in byloan sales ~~agricultural~~gains ~~real estate~~ and a $30.71 million byimprovement ~~commercial~~in ~~real~~net ~~estate. The~~interest ~~average~~income ~~maturity~~from of the ~~loans~~same period ~~purchased~~during ~~is approximately 10 years~~2011. ~~The~~These ~~premiums~~items onwere ~~the~~partially ~~loans~~offset ~~are~~by ~~being amortized over~~ a ~~three year period~~$0. ~~Management~~1 ~~will~~million increase ~~continue~~in tothe ~~evaluate~~provision ~~DSB's~~for loan ~~portfolio~~losses and ~~may~~a ~~make additional purchases as deemed appropriate~~$0. ~~Management~~2 ~~is authorized to invest up to $15~~ million increase in ~~government~~tax expense ~~guaranteed~~for ~~loan~~the ~~purchases~~period.

~~The allowance for loan losses remained stable during the first half of 2012 at $6.6 million. Provisions of $0.3 million were added~~ Year-to-date ~~the~~net ~~allowance~~income infor the first ~~six~~ nine months of 2012 ~~and~~was ~~were~~steady ~~partially offset by net charge-offs of approximately $0.3 million during the period. The allowance equals 2.16% of total loans as of June 30, 2012 compared to 2.21%~~ at ~~December 31, 2011. Nonaccrual loans totaled~~ $7.2 ~~million at June 30, 2012, a decrease of approximately $1~~.56 million when compared to ~~nonaccrual~~the ~~loans~~same ofperiod ~~$8.7 million at December 31,~~ in 2011.

Net interest income was $3.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $0.1 million or 3.1% from $3.4 million during the third quarter of 2011. Net interest income for the first nine months of 2012 as well as the first nine months of 2011 was $10.4 million. The following ~~table~~tables ~~sets~~set forth ~~nonaccrual~~a ~~loans~~summary byof ~~major~~the ~~category~~changes in average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as well as the amount of interest earned and interest paid with the resulting average yield or rate for both the current quarter and year-to-date 2012:

	June 30,		December 31,
	Three Months Ended September 30,
$(000)s	2012		2011
	2012			2011
Secured By Real Estate:
($000s)	Average	Income	Average	Average	Income	Average
Residential	$1,591		$2,195
	Daily	and	Yield or	Daily	and	Yield or
Agricultural	116		0
	Balance	Expense	Rate	Balance	Expense	Rate
Commercial	2,079		2,299
ASSETS
Construction	2,605		3,364
Interest-earning assets:
Subtotal Real Estate Loans	6,391		7,858
Loans (1) (2)	$304,839	$3,825	5.02%	$296,619	$3,847	5.19%
Secured by commercial assets	574		563
Investment securities: (3)
Secured by agricultural assets	0		0
Taxable securities	62,521	291	1.86%	50,388	313	2.48%
Secured by other assets	203		235
Nontaxable securities (2)	15,148	238	6.29%	18,142	346	7.63%
TOTAL	$7,168		$8,656
Federal funds sold	9,776	3	0.14%	10,677	4	0.13%
Other investments	6,616	21	1.26%	11,250	18	0.65%
Total earning assets	$398,900	$4,378	4.39%	$387,076	$4,528	4.68%
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$23,184	$11	0.18%	$19,765	$9	0.18%
Savings accounts	23,240	16	0.28%	21,201	16	0.30%
Money market accounts	136,063	140	0.41%	123,042	229	0.74%
Time deposits	102,517	363	1.42%	111,291	471	1.69%
Other borrowed funds	37,812	254	2.69%	42,533	278	2.61%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$322,816	$784	0.97%	$317,832	$1,003	1.26%
Net interest income and rate spread		$3,594	3.42%		$3,525	3.42%
Net yield on interest earning assets			3.60%			3.64%

DBI's ratio of loans more than 30 days past due (including nonaccrual loans) to total loans was 2.51% at June 30, 2012, compared to 3.58% at year-end 2011. As of June 30, 2012, management had identified $35.3 million of potential problem loans compared to $38.2 million at year-end 2011. Loan quality continues to be a concern and improving the portfolio is the primary focus for management. DBI has no accruing loans that are past due 90 days or more.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
($000s)	Average	Income	Average	Average	Income	Average
	Daily	and	Yield or	Daily	and	Yield or
	Balance	Expense	Rate	Balance	Expense	Rate
ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1) (2)	$302,308	$11,466	5.06%	$297,729	$11,779	5.28%
Investment securities: (3)
Taxable securities	60,499	869	1.91%	45,397	860	2.52%
Nontaxable securities (2)	15,291	812	7.08%	21,465	1,219	7.57%
Federal funds sold	10,104	10	0.14%	12,234	15	0.16%
Other investments	11,821	88	0.99%	10,944	91	1.11%
Total earning assets	$400,023	$13,245	4.41%	$387,769	$13,964	4.80%

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$22,316	$30	0.18%	$20,596	$29	0.19%
Savings accounts	22,448	49	0.29%	20,787	50	0.32%
Money market accounts	135,816	538	0.53%	120,383	693	0.77%
Time deposits	103,892	1,137	1.46%	115,068	1,545	1.79%
Other borrowed funds	38,862	773	2.65%	43,386	841	2.58%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$323,334	$2,527	1.04%	$320,220	$3,158	1.32%


Net interest income and rate spread		$10,718	3.37%		$10,806	3.48%

Net yield on interest earning assets			3.57%			3.72%

~~DBI's investment in other real estate~~ (~~property~~1) ~~acquired~~Nonaccrual ~~through foreclosure or in satisfaction of~~ loans) ~~decreased~~are ~~$0.4~~included ~~million~~ in the average ~~first~~daily ~~six months of 2012. At June 30, 2012 the $0.4 million~~ balance ~~in other real estate comprised three construction/land development properties totaling $0.2 million~~figure, ~~one~~but ~~property~~interest ~~secured~~income byassociated ~~agricultural-related real estate~~ with anthese ~~estimated~~loans is ~~value~~recognized ofunder ~~$0.2 million and two residential real estate properties with an estimated value of $36,000. This compares to~~ the ~~seven~~cash ~~parcels~~basis ~~held~~method ~~at year-end 2011 consisting~~ of $0accounting.~~3 million in construction/land development properties, $0.2 million in commercial real estate, $0.2 million in agricultural-related real estate and $0.1 million in residential real estate.~~

(2) The ~~following~~yield ~~table~~on ~~sets~~tax-exempt ~~forth~~loans ~~certain~~and securities ~~data~~is ~~concerning~~computed ~~nonaccrual~~on ~~loans,~~a ~~past~~fully ~~due~~taxable ~~accruing~~equivalent ~~loans,~~basis ~~restructured~~assuming ~~loans~~a ~~and~~tax ~~other~~rate of ~~real estate:~~34%.

	June 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
		% of Total		% of Total
$(000)s	Amount	Loans	Amount	Loans
Nonaccrual Loans (1)	$7,168	2.4%	$8,656	2.9%
Restructured Accruing Loans	5,438	1.8%	4,449	1.4%
Accruing Loans Past Due
90 Days or More	0	0.0%	0	0.0%
Total	$12,606	4.1%	$13,105	4.3%
Other Real Estate	$439		$802

(3) Securities are shown at amortized cost.

~~(1) Includes~~Net ~~restructured~~interest ~~loans~~income for the quarter-ended September 30, 2012 was stable when compared to the same period of $22011.8 ~~million~~The asnet interest ofrate ~~June~~spread on a tax equivalent basis was 3.42% for both the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and $2011. DBI's yield on earning assets declined 29 basis points from 4.368% ~~million~~for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 to 4.39% as of the ~~December~~quarter 31ended September 30, 2012. This was due in large part to a decline in the yield on tax-exempt securities of 134 basis points and a decline of 62 basis points in the yield on taxable securities for the current quarter when compared to the same period of 2011. The reduction in the yield on earning assets was offset by a decline in the cost of funds of 29 basis points from 1.26% for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 to 0.97% during the third quarter of 2012. This reduction in the cost of funds was primarily impacted by a 33 basis point reduction in the rate on money market accounts and a shift in average balances from higher cost certificates of deposits to lower cost money market accounts.

~~Total~~During ~~deposits~~the ~~declined~~first ~~$3.4~~nine ~~million~~months atof ~~June 30~~2012, ~~2012~~the ~~compared~~net interest torate ~~balances~~spread aton ~~December~~a ~~31,~~tax ~~2011. Noninterest-bearing~~equivalent ~~deposits~~basis ~~decreased~~fell by11 ~~$6.2~~basis ~~million,~~points orcompared ~~13.0%, during~~ to the first ~~half~~nine months of ~~2012. Interest-bearing~~the ~~deposits~~prior ~~increased~~year ~~$2.8~~from ~~million or 1~~3.048% ~~between~~at ~~December~~September 3130, 2011 ~~and~~to 3.37% ~~June~~at September 30, 2012. ~~Money~~ ~~market~~The ~~accounts~~yield ~~increased~~on ~~$4.1~~earning ~~million~~assets orfell ~~3.1%~~39 basis points during ~~the~~this ~~first~~period ~~six~~from ~~months~~4.80% ofin ~~2012~~2011 ~~and~~to ~~savings~~4.41% ~~accounts~~in ~~increased~~2012 ~~$2.4~~due ~~million~~in orlarge ~~11.2%~~part ~~during~~to ~~the~~a 22 ~~same~~basis ~~period. The~~point ~~trend~~decline in ~~money~~the ~~market~~yield ~~balances~~on ~~continues~~loans toas ~~increase~~well ~~given~~as ~~the~~a ~~current~~61 ~~rate~~basis ~~environment~~point reduction ~~and~~in ~~depositors~~the ~~reluctance~~yield toon ~~commit~~taxable tosecurities ~~long-term~~during ~~rates~~this same period. ~~NOW~~This decline ~~account~~in ~~balances~~the ~~decreased~~yield ~~$1.2~~on ~~million~~earning orassets ~~5.4%~~was ~~since~~partially ~~year-end~~offset ~~2011,~~by ~~while~~a ~~certificates~~decrease in the cost of ~~deposit~~funds ~~also~~of ~~fell~~28 ~~$2.5~~basis ~~million,~~points orfrom 21.432%, ~~during~~year-to-date ~~the~~2011 ~~first~~to ~~half of 2012~~1. ~~Given~~04% for the ~~current~~same ~~interest~~period ~~rate~~in ~~environment,~~2012. ~~there~~The ~~has~~reduction ~~been~~in athe ~~shift~~cost ~~away from certificates~~ of ~~deposit~~funds ~~into~~was ~~money~~primarily impacted ~~market~~by ~~accounts~~a as33 ~~customers~~basis ~~are~~point ~~reluctant~~reduction toin ~~lock~~the ~~into a~~ rate atand ~~this~~an ~~time~~$11. ~~DBI's~~2 ~~money~~million ~~market~~decline in ~~rates~~the ~~are~~average ~~comparable~~balances toon ~~its rates for short-term~~ certificates of ~~deposit~~deposits.

~~Interest~~DBI's provision for loan losses was $0.2 million for both the third quarter of 2012 and the same period of 2011. Net charge-~~bearing~~offs ~~deposits~~of ~~consisted~~$0.4 million were recognized in the third quarter of 2012 compared to nominal net charge-offs during the ~~following:~~corresponding period in 2011. For both the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 DBI's provision for loan losses totaled $0.5 million. Net charge-offs for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2012 totaled $0.7 million versus $0.8 million for the comparable period in 2011.

$(000)s	6/30/2012	12/31/2011
NOW accounts	$21,073	$22,278
Savings accounts	23,488	21,129
Money market accounts	135,061	130,959
Certificates of deposit	103,467	105,957
TOTAL	$283,089	$280,323

Noninterest income for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $0.8 million, an increase of $0.3 million or 71.5% compared to $0.5 million during the corresponding period in 2011. During the third quarter of 2012, gains on the sale of securities of $0.2 million were recognized while no gains were recorded during the same period during 2011. For tax purposes, thirteen taxable municipals were sold during the most recent quarter along with two agency pools resulting in the recorded gains. Also, gains on the sale of loans to the secondary market were $0.1 million higher than the same period for 2011. This is due to an increase in the volume of loans sold by $4.3 million to $11.2 million in the third quarter of 2012. Noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $1.9 million an increase of $0.4 million or 30.1% versus $1.5 million recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. This was primarily due to an increase of $0.2 million in gains on both the sale of loans as well as securities sales during the first nine months of 2012 compared to the same period of 2011.

~~Short-term~~Noninterest ~~borrowings~~expense ~~decreased~~increased $0.51 million or 4 3.18% asto $2.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 compared to $2.5 million for the third quarter of ~~June~~2011. Slight increases in data processing expenses along with salaries and employee benefits for the current quarter compared to the same period of 2011 are the primary reasons for this increase. Higher health insurance costs along with additional staffing led to this increase. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, noninterest expense increased $0.2 million or 2.3% to $7.7 million compared to ~~December~~$7.5 31million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. ~~Loan~~ ~~volume~~Salaries ~~for~~and ~~DACC~~employee ~~was~~benefits ~~relatively~~were ~~stable~~$0.2 million higher during the first ~~quarter~~three quarters of 2012 ~~thereby~~when ~~eliminating~~compared to the same ~~need~~period for 2011. In addition to ~~advance~~higher ~~funds~~health ~~against~~insurance costs and staffing, there was an accrual adjustment made during the ~~line~~first quarter of ~~credit~~2011 to atcorrect ~~Agribank,~~an ~~FCB~~over-accrual for 2010 bonuses. ~~Long-term~~This ~~borrowings~~adjustment ~~declined~~was not repeated during 2012. A decline of $10.41 million orin ~~5.0%~~FDIC ~~since~~insurance ~~year-end~~premiums ~~2011~~for ~~due~~the first nine months of 2012 compared to ~~maturities~~the same period of ~~FHLB~~2011 ~~advances~~partially offset the increase in salaries and employee benefit costs. The lower FDIC insurance premiums resulted from a new premium structure implemented by the FDIC effective April 1, 2011.

~~Capital~~Additional ~~Resources~~OTTI credit loss was recognized during the most recent quarter on one of the two securities previously determined to be other-than-temporarily-impaired. The credit loss recognized through the income statement was nominal during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and the third quarter of 2011 on the same security. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 OTTI credit losses recognized on two securities previously determined to be other-than-temporarily-impaired totaled $0.1 million compared to $0.2 million for the same period in 2011.

~~Stockholders'~~For ~~equity~~the ~~increased~~three bymonths ~~$0.9~~ended ~~million~~September ~~to $56.9 million as of June~~ 30, 2012 DBI ~~from~~recorded ~~$56.0~~combined ~~million~~federal atand ~~December~~state ~~31,~~income ~~2011~~tax ~~due~~expense ~~primarily to earnings for the period~~ of $10.75 million, ~~and~~an increase ~~a decrease in other comprehensive loss~~ of $0.32 million ~~that~~or ~~were~~42.5% ~~partially~~compared ~~offset~~to byincome ~~the~~tax ~~dividend~~expense ~~payable~~recorded offor the ~~$0.9~~third ~~million~~quarter ~~and purchase~~ of ~~treasury stock of $0~~2011.1 ~~million. As~~These ofprovisions ~~June~~reflect ~~30,~~effective ~~2012~~income ~~DBI's~~tax ~~leverage~~rates of ~~ratio was 13.7~~35%, ~~its~~for ~~risk-based~~the ~~core~~third ~~capital~~quarter ~~ratio~~of ~~was~~2012 ~~18.3%~~ and ~~its~~31% ~~risk-based~~for ~~total~~the ~~capital~~third ~~ratio~~quarter ~~was 19.5%. As~~ of ~~June 30, 2012, DSB~~2011. DBI's ~~leverage~~combined ~~ratio~~statutory ~~was~~tax ~~10.7%~~rate ~~and~~is ~~its~~39%. ~~risk-based~~The ~~total~~lower ~~capital~~effective ~~ratio~~income ~~was~~tax ~~16.0%.~~rates are ~~DBI~~primarily ~~and~~due ~~DSB continue~~ to ~~maintain~~certain ~~capital~~federally ~~levels~~tax ~~well~~exempt ~~above~~interest ~~regulatory~~earned ~~minimum~~on ~~levels~~state ~~established~~and local ~~for~~government ~~"well-capitalized"~~investment ~~institutions~~securities. ~~DBI~~ ~~believes~~The ~~its~~effective ~~and~~tax ~~DSB's~~rates ~~capital~~for ~~positions~~the asnine months ~~June~~ended September 30, 2012 ~~are~~and ~~adequate~~2011 ~~under~~were ~~current~~35% ~~economic~~and ~~conditions~~30%, respectively.

~~Liquidity~~Financial Condition

~~Liquidity~~Total ~~refers~~assets toincreased ~~the~~by ~~ability~~$4.2 ofmillion between ~~DBI~~December to31, ~~generate~~2011 ~~adequate~~and ~~amounts~~September of30, ~~cash~~2012. toIncreases ~~meet~~in ~~its~~investment securities ~~needs~~of $13. ~~DBI~~7 ~~maintains~~million, ~~liquid~~or ~~assets~~20.3%, and ~~established~~loans ~~lines~~ of ~~credit~~$5.8 tomillion, ~~meet~~or ~~its liquidity needs~~1. ~~DBI's~~9%, during ~~Board~~the offirst ~~Directors~~nine ~~annually~~months ~~approves~~of a2012 ~~Consolidated~~were ~~Contingent~~the ~~Liquidity~~primary ~~Plan,~~factors ~~which~~for ~~reviews~~ the ~~sources~~higher assets ~~and~~at ~~uses~~September ~~of liquidity for DBI~~30, ~~DSB and DACC~~2012. Cash, cash equivalents and ~~federal~~fed funds sold decreased by $1913.70 million, or 4630.78%, tosince ~~$22.4~~December ~~million~~31, ~~during~~2011, ~~the~~and ~~first~~other investments ~~six~~declined ~~months of 2012 primarily due to the increases in investment securities of~~ $101.47 million, ~~and~~or ~~loans of $6~~37.8%, ~~million~~ during ~~this period. The major sources and uses of cash are detailed in~~ the ~~accompanying~~same ~~Consolidated~~period ~~Statements~~to partially ofoffset ~~Cash~~these ~~Flows~~increases.

InThe ~~addition~~following totable ~~on-balance~~sets ~~sheet~~forth ~~sources~~major oftypes ~~funds~~of loans, ~~DBI~~excluding ~~also~~loans ~~has~~held ~~off-balance~~for ~~sheet sources available to meet liquidity needs. Specifically~~sale, ~~DBI~~by ~~has~~primary ~~unused~~collateral ~~lines~~and ~~of credit of $50.0 million as of June 30, 2012. This includes a $20.0 million line of credit with~~ the ~~Federal Reserve Bank~~ percentage of ~~Chicago~~total ~~that was established in 1999. DSB has not borrowed on this line. DBI also has $78.0 million of eligible~~ loans ~~and~~for ~~securities~~each ~~that could be pledged to increase its available credit. Management believes DBI's and DSB's liquidity positions as of June 30, 2012 are adequate under current economic conditions.~~type:

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
$(000)s	Amount	%	Amount	%
Real Estate:
Residential	$70,114	23.1%	$72,656	24.4%
Commercial	59,090	19.5%	60,865	20.4%
Agricultural	76,040	25.0%	78,768	26.5%
Construction	13,305	4.4%	11,655	3.9%
	$218,549	72.0%	$223,944	75.2%
Commercial	41,008	13.5%	35,178	11.8%
Agricultural	33,433	11.0%	27,661	9.3%
Consumer and other	10,610	3.5%	11,049	3.7%
TOTAL	$303,600	100.0%	$297,832	100.0%

~~DBI~~During ~~and~~2011, ~~its~~management ~~subsidiaries~~made ~~are~~the ~~parties~~decision to purchase ~~financial~~government ~~instruments~~guaranteed ~~with~~loans ~~off-balance~~given ~~sheet~~the ~~risk~~lack inof ~~the~~quality ~~normal~~loan ~~course~~growth potential ofcurrently ~~business~~available towithin ~~meet~~DSB's ~~the~~lending ~~financing~~market. ~~needs~~As of ~~their~~September ~~customers~~30, 2012 there were approximately $12. ~~These~~9 ~~financial~~million ~~instruments~~of ~~include~~government ~~commitments~~guaranteed toloans recorded, ~~extend~~of ~~credit~~which ~~and~~$9.3 ~~stand-~~million are secured by ~~letters~~agricultural ofreal ~~credit~~estate and $3. ~~Those~~6 ~~instruments~~million ~~involve,~~by tocommercial ~~varying~~real ~~degrees,~~estate. ~~elements~~The average maturity of ~~credit~~the ~~and~~loans purchased ~~interest~~is ~~rate~~approximately ~~risk~~10 inyears. ~~excess~~The ofpremiums on the ~~amount~~loans ~~recognized~~are inbeing amortized ~~the~~over ~~statement~~a ofthree ~~financial~~year ~~condition~~period. ~~The~~ ~~contract~~Management orwill ~~notional~~continue ~~amounts~~to ofevaluate ~~those~~DSB's loan ~~instruments~~portfolio ~~reflect~~and ~~the~~may ~~extent~~make ofadditional ~~involvement~~purchases ~~DBI~~as ~~and~~deemed ~~its~~appropriate. Management ~~subsidiaries~~is ~~have~~authorized into ~~particular~~invest ~~classes~~up ofto ~~financial~~$15 ~~instruments~~million in government guaranteed loan purchases.

The ~~exposure~~allowance offor ~~DBI~~loan ~~and~~losses ~~its~~declined ~~subsidiaries~~$0.2 million toduring ~~credit~~the ~~loss~~first innine ~~the~~months ~~event~~ of ~~nonperformance~~2012 byto ~~the~~$6.4 ~~other~~million. ~~party~~Provisions toof $0.5 ~~the~~million ~~financial~~were ~~instrument~~added ~~for~~to ~~commitments~~the toallowance ~~extend~~in ~~credit~~the ~~and~~first ~~standby~~nine ~~letters~~months of ~~credit~~2012,which were isoffset ~~represented~~ by ~~the~~net ~~contractual~~charge-offs ~~or notional amount~~ of ~~these~~approximately ~~instruments~~$0. ~~DBI~~7 ~~and~~million ~~its~~during ~~subsidiaries use~~ the ~~same~~period. The ~~credit~~allowance ~~policies~~equals in2.11% ~~making~~of ~~commitments~~total ~~and~~loans ~~conditional~~as ~~obligations~~of asSeptember ~~for~~30, ~~on-balance~~2012 ~~sheet~~compared ~~instruments~~to 2. ~~DBI~~21% ~~and~~at ~~its~~December ~~subsidiaries~~31, ~~require~~2011. ~~collateral~~Nonaccrual orloans ~~other~~totaled ~~security~~$6.2 tomillion ~~support~~at ~~financial~~September 30, ~~instruments~~2012, ~~with~~a ~~credit~~decrease ~~risk. The~~of ~~following~~approximately ~~table~~$2.5 ~~sets~~million ~~forth~~compared ~~DBI's~~to ~~commitments~~nonaccrual toloans of ~~extend~~$8.7 ~~credit~~million ~~and~~at ~~standby~~December ~~letters~~31, of2011. ~~credit:~~

	Contract or
	Notional Amount	Secured
(In thousands)	June 30, 2012	Portion
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$43,661	$39,543
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written	1,403	1,403

The following table sets forth nonaccrual loans by major category:

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. DBI and its subsidiaries evaluate each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties.

	September 30,	December 31,
$(000)s	2012	2011
Secured By Real Estate:
Residential	$1,282	$2,195
Agricultural	116	0
Commercial	1,755	2,299
Construction	2,556	3,364
Subtotal Real Estate Loans	5,709	7,858
Secured by commercial assets	406	563
Secured by agricultural assets	0	0
Secured by other assets	43	235
TOTAL	$6,158	$8,656

~~Standby~~DBI's ~~letters~~ratio of ~~credit~~loans ~~are~~more ~~conditional~~than ~~commitments~~30 ~~issued~~days bypast due ~~DSB~~(including tononaccrual ~~guarantee~~loans) ~~the performance of a customer~~ to atotal ~~third~~loans ~~party~~was 2. ~~Those~~78% ~~guarantees~~at ~~are~~September ~~primarily~~30, 2012, ~~issued~~compared to ~~support~~3.58% ~~commercial~~at ~~business~~year-end ~~transactions~~2011. ~~When~~ aAs ~~customer fails to perform according to the terms~~ of ~~the~~September ~~agreement~~30, ~~DSB~~2012, ~~honors~~management had ~~drafts~~identified ~~drawn~~$42.8 bymillion ~~the~~of ~~third~~potential ~~party~~problem inloans ~~amounts~~compared up to ~~the contract amount~~$38. A2 million ~~majority~~at ofyear-end ~~the~~2011. ~~letters~~Loan ofquality ~~credit~~continues ~~expire~~to ~~within~~be ~~one~~a ~~year. The~~concern ~~credit~~and ~~risk~~improving the ~~involved~~portfolio ~~in issuing letters of credit~~ is ~~essentially~~ the ~~same~~primary asfocus ~~that~~for ~~involved in extending loans to customers~~management. ~~Collateral~~ ~~held~~DBI ~~varies~~has ~~but~~no ~~may~~accruing ~~include~~loans that ~~accounts~~are ~~receivable,~~past ~~inventory,~~due ~~property,~~90 ~~plant~~days ~~and~~or ~~equipment~~more ~~and~~at ~~income-producing~~September ~~commercial~~30, ~~properties and residential properties~~2012. ~~All letters of credit are fully collateralized.~~

~~Item~~DBI's investment in other real estate (property acquired through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans) decreased $0.5 million in the first nine months of 2012. At September 30, 2012 the $0.3 million balance in other real estate comprised three construction/land development properties totaling approximately $0.2 ~~Quantitative~~million, one property secured by agricultural-related real estate with an estimated value of $0.1 million and ~~Qualitative~~one ~~Disclosures~~nominal ~~About~~residential ~~Market~~real ~~Risk~~estate property. This compares to the seven parcels held at year-end 2011 consisting of $0.3 million in construction/land development properties, $0.2 million in commercial real estate, $0.2 million in agricultural-related real estate and $0.1 million in residential real estate.

~~DBI's~~The ~~primary~~following ~~market~~table ~~risk~~sets ~~position~~forth ~~has~~certain ~~not~~data concerning ~~materially~~nonaccrual ~~changed~~loans, ~~from~~past ~~that~~due ~~disclosed~~accruing inloans, ~~DBI's~~restructured ~~2011~~loans ~~Annual~~and other ~~Report.~~real estate:

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
		% of Total		% of Total
$(000)s	Amount	Loans	Amount	Loans

Nonaccrual Loans (1)	$6,158	2.0%	$8,656	2.9%
Restructured Accruing Loans	5,393	1.7%	4,449	1.4%
Accruing Loans Past Due
90 Days or More	0	0.0%	0	0.0%
Total	$11,551	3.7%	$13,105	4.3%
Other Real Estate	$337		$802

As(1) ~~required~~Includes byrestructured ~~Rule~~loans ~~13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act~~ of ~~1934,~~$2.7 million as ~~amended, DBI's management, under the supervision and with the participation~~ of ~~DBI's~~September ~~principal executive officer and principal financial officer~~30, ~~has~~2012 ~~evaluated DBI's disclosure controls~~ and ~~procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report~~$4. ~~Based~~3 onmillion ~~that evaluation, DBI's principal executive officer and principal financial officer believe that DBI's disclosure controls and procedures are effective~~ as of ~~the~~December ~~end of the period covered by this Report~~31, 2011.

~~Because~~Total ofdeposits ~~its~~increased ~~inherent~~$5.1 ~~limitations~~million at September 30, ~~internal~~2012 ~~control~~compared ~~over~~to ~~financial~~balances ~~reporting~~at ~~may~~December ~~not~~31, ~~prevent~~2011. Noninterest-bearing ordeposits ~~detect~~decreased ~~misstatements~~by $3. ~~Also~~6 million, ~~projections~~or of7.6%, ~~any~~during ~~evaluation~~the first nine months of ~~effectiveness~~2012. Interest-bearing deposits increased $8.7 million or 3.1% between December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012. Money market accounts increased $8.5 million or 6.5% during the first nine months of ~~future~~2012 ~~periods~~and ~~are~~savings accounts ~~subject~~increased $2.5 million or 11.6% during the same period. The trend in money market balances continues to increase given the ~~risk~~current ~~that~~rate ~~controls~~environment and ~~may~~depositors ~~become~~reluctance ~~inadequate~~to ~~because~~commit to long-term rates. NOW account balances increased $1.7 million or 7.5% since year-end 2011, while certificates of deposit ~~changes~~declined in$4.0 ~~conditions~~million, or ~~that~~3.7%, during the ~~degree~~same period. Given the current interest rate environment, there has been a shift away from certificates of ~~compliance~~deposit ~~with~~into ~~the~~money ~~policies~~market oraccounts ~~procedures~~as ~~may~~customers ~~deteriorate~~are reluctant to lock into a rate at this time. DBI's money market rates are comparable to its rates for short-term certificates of deposit.

~~There~~Interest-bearing ~~were~~deposits noconsisted ~~significant~~of ~~changes in DBI's internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that have significantly affected those controls during~~ the ~~fiscal quarter covered by this Report, including any correction actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.~~ following:

Part II. Other Information

$(000)s	9/30/2012	12/31/2011
NOW accounts	$23,945	$22,278
Savings accounts	23,585	21,129
Money market accounts	139,490	130,959
Certificates of deposit	101,997	105,957
TOTAL	$289,017	$280,323

~~Item~~Short-term 1Aborrowings decreased $0.8 ~~Risk~~million or ~~Factors~~7.3% as of September 30, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. Loan volume for DACC was relatively stable during the first quarter of 2012, thereby eliminating the need to advance funds against the line of credit at Agribank, FCB. Long-term borrowings declined $1.4 million or 5.0% since year-end 2011 due to maturities of FHLB advances.

InCapital addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Item 1A - Risk Factors of DBI's 2011 Annual Report, which could materially affect DBI's business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes in risk factors as described in such Report.Resources

~~Item~~Stockholders' equity increased by $2.0 million ~~Unregistered~~to ~~Sales~~$58.0 million as of ~~Equity~~September ~~Securities~~30, 2012 from $56.0 million at December 31, 2011 due primarily to earnings for the period of $2.6 million and a ~~Use~~decrease in other comprehensive loss of ~~Proceeds~~$0.4 million that were partially offset by the dividend payment of $0.9 million and purchase of treasury stock of $0.1 million. As of September 30, 2012 DBI's leverage ratio was 13.8%, its risk-based core capital ratio was 18.7% and its risk-based total capital ratio was 19.9%. As of September 30, 2012, DSB's leverage ratio was 10.6% and its risk-based total capital ratio was 16.4%. DBI and DSB continue to maintain capital levels well above regulatory minimum levels established for "well-capitalized" institutions. DBI believes its and DSB's capital positions as of September 30, 2012 are adequate under current economic conditions.

~~During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, DBI did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1033, as amended, or repurchase any of its equity securities.~~Liquidity

~~The~~Liquidity ~~Federal~~refers ~~Reserve~~to ~~Board ("~~the ~~Board")~~ability ~~has~~of ~~adopted~~DBI ~~regulations~~to generate ~~that~~adequate ~~deal~~amounts ~~with~~of ~~the~~cash ~~measure~~to meet its needs. DBI maintains liquid assets and established lines of ~~capitalization~~credit ~~for~~to ~~bank~~meet ~~holding~~its ~~companies~~liquidity needs. ~~The~~ DBI's Board of ~~has~~Directors ~~also~~annually ~~issued~~approves a ~~policy~~Consolidated ~~statement~~Contingent onLiquidity Plan, which reviews the ~~payment~~sources and uses of ~~cash~~liquidity ~~dividends~~for byDBI, ~~bank~~DSB ~~holding~~and ~~companies~~DACC. Cash, ~~wherein~~cash equivalents ~~the~~and ~~Board~~federal ~~has~~funds ~~stated~~sold ~~that~~decreased a$13.0 ~~bank~~million ~~holding~~or ~~company~~30.8% ~~experiencing~~to ~~earnings~~$29.1 million ~~weaknesses~~during ~~should~~the ~~not~~first ~~pay~~nine ~~cash~~months ~~dividends~~of ~~exceeding~~2012 ~~its~~primarily ~~net~~due ~~income~~to orthe ~~which~~increases ~~could~~in investment ~~only~~securities beof ~~funded~~$13.7 inmillion ~~ways~~and ~~that~~loans ~~weaken~~of ~~the~~$5.8 ~~bank~~million ~~holding~~during ~~company's~~this period. ~~financial~~The ~~health,~~major ~~such~~sources asand byuses ~~borrowing~~of cash are detailed in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

~~The~~In ~~ability~~addition ~~of DBI~~ to ~~pay dividends~~ on-balance ~~its~~sheet ~~common~~sources ~~stock~~of funds, isDBI ~~largely~~also ~~dependent~~has ~~upon~~off-balance ~~the~~sheet ~~ability~~sources ofavailable ~~DSB~~ to ~~pay~~meet ~~dividends~~liquidity needs. onSpecifically, ~~its stock held by~~ DBI~~. DSB's~~ ~~ability~~has tounused ~~pay~~lines ~~dividends~~of iscredit ~~restricted~~of by$49.1 ~~both~~million ~~state~~as ~~and~~of September ~~federal~~30, ~~laws and regulations~~2012. ~~DSB~~ isThis ~~subject~~includes toa ~~policies~~$20.0 ~~and~~million ~~regulations~~line ~~issued by the FDIC and the Division~~ of ~~Banking~~credit ofwith the Federal ~~Wisconsin~~Reserve ~~Department~~Bank of ~~Financial~~Chicago ~~Institutions~~that ~~("the~~was ~~Division"),~~established ~~which,~~ in ~~part,~~1999. ~~establish~~DSB ~~minimum~~has ~~acceptable~~not borrowed ~~capital~~on ~~requirements~~this ~~for~~line. ~~banks,~~DBI ~~thereby~~also ~~limiting~~has ~~the~~$80.1 ~~ability~~million of ~~such~~eligible ~~banks~~loans toand securities ~~pay dividends. In addition, Wisconsin law provides~~ that ~~state~~could ~~chartered~~be ~~banks~~pledged ~~may~~to ~~declare~~increase ~~and~~its ~~pay~~available ~~dividends~~credit. ~~out~~Management believes ofDBI's ~~undivided profits but only after provision has been made for all expenses, losses, required reserves, taxes~~ and ~~interest~~DSB's ~~accrued~~liquidity orpositions ~~due~~as ~~from the bank. Payments~~ of ~~dividends~~September in30, ~~some~~2012 ~~circumstances~~are adequate ~~may~~under ~~require~~current ~~the~~economic ~~written consent of the Division~~conditions.

~~Item~~Off-Balance ~~6. Exhibits~~Sheet Arrangements

~~(a) Exhibits:~~DBI and its subsidiaries are parties to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of their customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial condition. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement DBI and its subsidiaries have in particular classes of financial instruments.

~~31.1~~The ~~Certification~~exposure of DBI and its subsidiaries to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the ~~Chief~~other ~~Executive~~party ~~Officer~~to ~~Pursuant~~the financial instrument for commitments to ~~Section~~extend ~~302~~credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~contractual ~~Act~~or notional amount of ~~2002~~these instruments. DBI and its subsidiaries use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for on-balance sheet instruments. DBI and its subsidiaries require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk. The following table sets forth DBI's commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit:

31.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Contract or
	Notional Amount	Secured
(In thousands)	September 30, 2012	Portion
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$43,722	$40,251
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written	1,424	1,424

~~32.1~~Commitments ~~Certification~~to ofextend ~~Periodic~~credit ~~Financial~~are ~~Report~~agreements to bylend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the ~~Chief~~contract. ~~Executive~~Commitments ~~Officer~~generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and ~~Chief~~may ~~Financial~~require ~~Officer~~payment ~~Pursuant~~of toa ~~Section~~fee. ~~906~~Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the ~~Sarbanes~~total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. DBI and its subsidiaries evaluate each customer's creditworthiness on a case-~~Oxley~~by-case ~~Act~~basis. ofCollateral ~~2002~~held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties.

~~101~~Standby ~~Interactive~~letters ~~data~~of ~~files~~credit ~~pursuant~~are conditional commitments issued by DSB to ~~Rule 405~~guarantee the performance of ~~Regulation S-T:~~a ~~(i) Consolidated~~customer ~~Statements~~to ofa ~~Financial~~third party. ~~Condition,~~Those ~~(ii) Consolidated~~guarantees ~~Statements~~are primarily issued to support commercial business transactions. When a customer fails to perform according to the terms of ~~Income~~the agreement, ~~(iii)~~DSB ~~Consolidated~~honors ~~Statements~~drafts drawn by the third party in amounts up to the contract amount. A majority of ~~Comprehensive~~the ~~Income,~~letters ~~(iv)~~of ~~Consolidated~~credit ~~Statements~~expire within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of ~~Changes~~credit is essentially the same as that involved in ~~Stockholders'~~extending ~~Equity,~~loans ~~(v) Consolidated~~to ~~Statements~~customers. ofCollateral ~~Cash~~held ~~Flows~~varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and ~~(vi) Notes~~equipment toand income-producing ~~Consolidated~~commercial ~~Financial~~properties ~~Statements~~and ~~tagged~~residential asproperties. ~~blocks~~All letters of ~~text.~~credit *are fully collateralized.

*Item As3. ~~provided~~Quantitative ~~in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished~~ and ~~not~~Qualitative ~~filed~~Disclosures ~~for~~About ~~purposes~~Market ~~of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.~~Risk

~~SIGNATURES~~DBI's primary market risk position has not materially changed from that disclosed in DBI's 2011 Annual Report.

~~Pursuant~~Item to4. ~~the~~Controls ~~requirements~~and ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~Procedures

~~DENMARK~~As ~~BANCSHARES~~required by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ~~INC~~as amended, DBI's management, under the supervision and with the participation of DBI's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated DBI's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, DBI's principal executive officer and principal financial officer believe that DBI's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report.

~~Date:~~Because ~~August~~of 8its inherent limitations, ~~2012 /s/~~internal control ~~John~~over Pfinancial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. ~~Olsen~~Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

~~John~~There P.were ~~Olsen~~no significant changes in DBI's internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that have significantly affected those controls during the fiscal quarter covered by this Report, including any correction actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

~~President~~Part ~~and~~II. ~~CEO~~Other Information

~~Date:~~Item ~~August 8, 2012 /s/ Dennis J~~1A. ~~Heim~~Risk Factors

~~Dennis~~In Jaddition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Item 1A - Risk Factors of DBI's 2011 Annual Report, which could materially affect DBI's business, financial condition or future results. ~~Heim~~There have been no material changes in risk factors as described in such Report.

~~Vice~~Item ~~President,~~2. ~~CFO~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and ~~Treasurer~~Use of Proceeds

During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, DBI did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1033, as amended, or repurchase any of its equity securities.

The Federal Reserve Board ("the Board") has adopted regulations that deal with the measure of capitalization for bank holding companies. The Board has also issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, wherein the Board has stated that a bank holding company experiencing earnings weaknesses should not pay cash dividends exceeding its net income or which could only be funded in ways that weaken the bank holding company's financial health, such as by borrowing.

The ability of DBI to pay dividends on its common stock is largely dependent upon the ability of DSB to pay dividends on its stock held by DBI. DSB's ability to pay dividends is restricted by both state and federal laws and regulations. DSB is subject to policies and regulations issued by the FDIC and the Division of Banking of the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions ("the Division"), which, in part, establish minimum acceptable capital requirements for banks, thereby limiting the ability of such banks to pay dividends. In addition, Wisconsin law provides that state chartered banks may declare and pay dividends out of undivided profits but only after provision has been made for all expenses, losses, required reserves, taxes and interest accrued or due from the bank. Payments of dividends in some circumstances may require the written consent of the Division.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:

31.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text. *

* As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DENMARK BANCSHARES, INC.

Date: November 12, 2012 /s/ John P. Olsen

John P. Olsen

President and CEO

Date: November 12, 2012 /s/ Dennis J. Heim

Dennis J. Heim

Vice President, CFO and Treasurer

Filing Compare · DENMARK BANCSHARES INC