UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly report pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010

o	Transition report pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______.

Commission file number 000-52404

VALUERICH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	41-2102385 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1804 N. Dixie Highway, Suite A, West Palm Beach, Florida (Address of principal executive offices) 33407 (Zip Code)

1804 N. Dixie Highway, Suite A
West Palm Beach, Florida		33407
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

1-561-370-3617

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of ~~May~~August 1713, 2010, the Company had outstanding 89,~~657~~617,124 shares of common stock, par value $0.01.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION3			3
Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
	Item 1. Financial Statements		3
	Item 1. Financial Statements	3
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		23
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	23
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures		23
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures	23
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION			24
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION		24
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings		24
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings	24
	Item 1A. Risk Factors		25
	Item 1A. Risk Factors	24
	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		25
	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	24
	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		25
	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	24
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		25
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	24
	Item 5. Other Information		25
	Item 5. Other Information	24
	Item 6. Exhibits		25
	Item 6. Exhibits	24
SIGNATURES			26
SIGNATURES		25

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

VALUERICH, Inc.

VALUERICH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009

	June 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	319,044			$	1,034,848
Investments in marketable securities		-				607,860
Current portion of note receivable - related party		281,163				-
Deferred financing costs		26,280				-
Total current assets		626,487				1,642,708

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net		381,688				424,936

OTHER ASSETS:
Real estate held for development and sale		1,242,103				139,000
Note receivable - related party, less current portion		416,927				-
Total other assets		1,659,030				139,000
Total assets	$	2,667,205			$	2,206,644

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	354,612			$	180,019
Deferred revenue		-				15,000
Convertible debt		25,000				25,000
Current portion of notes payable, net		178,092				-
Total current liabilities		557,704				220,019

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Note payable, net - less current portion		23,807				-
Obligations to issue comon stock		187,245				-
Total long-term liabilities		211,052				-
Total liabilities		768,756				220,019

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
8,657,124 shares issued and outstanding as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		86,571				86,571
Additional paid-in capital		7,190,811				7,190,811
Accumulated other comprehensive income		-				5,800
Accumulated deficit		(5,378,933	)			(5,296,557	)
Total stockholders' equity		1,898,449				1,986,625
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	2,667,205			$	2,206,644

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009

	March 31,
	2010			December 31,
	(unaudited)			2009
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	47,055		$	1,034,848
Investments in marketable securities		77,760			607,860
Current portion of Note Receivable		330,000			-
Deferred financing costs		25,568			-
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		480,383			1,642,708
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net		397,696			424,936
OTHER ASSETS
Investment in real estate		959,432			139,000
Note receivable, less current portion		474,251			-
TOTAL OTHER ASSETS		1,433,683			139,000
TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,311,762		$	2,206,644
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	231,653		$	180,019
Deferred revenue		-			15,000
Convertible note payable		25,000			25,000
Note Payable, net of debt discount of $30,671 and $0
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009		169,329			-
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		425,982			220,019
TOTAL LIABILITIES	$	425,982		$	220,019
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		-			-
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
8,657,124 shares issued and outstanding as
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.		86,571			86,571
Additional paid-in capital		7,190,811			7,190,811
Accumulated other comprehensive income		54,760			5,800
Accumulated deficit		(5,446,362	)		(5,296,557	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		1,885,780			1,986,625
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	2,311,762		$	2,206,644
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

VALUERICH, Inc.

VALUERICH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,			June 30,			June 30,			June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009

REVENUE:
Consulting income	$	-		$	30,777		$	15,000		$	68,262
Real estate sales		268,407			-			268,407			-
Net revenue		268,407			30,777			283,407			68,262

COST OF REVENUE		36,466			-			36,466			-
Gross profit		231,941			30,777			246,941			68,262

OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries and wages		55,357			142,124			127,498			249,120
Selling, general and administrative expenses		74,375			79,504			135,408			128,184
Professional fees		62,131			71,638			89,717			167,124
Depreciation and amortization expense		16,007			12,856			43,248			24,821
Total operating expenses		207,870			306,122			395,871			569,249

INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		24,071			(275,345	)		(148,930	)		(500,987	)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
Interest expense		(16,926	)		-			(25,807	)		-
Dividend and interest income, net		13,829			19,516			31,154			39,873
Reclassification of holding gain (loss)		(3,260	)		67,586			-			(71,193	)
Realized gain (loss) on marketable securities		49,715			7,914			57,207			73,150
Other income		-			1,830			4,000			12,376
Total other income		43,358			96,846			66,554			54,206

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR
INCOME TAXES		67,429			(178,499	)		(82,376	)		(446,781	)

INCOME TAX PROVISION		-			-			-			-

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	67,429		$	(178,499	)	$	(82,376	)	$	(446,781	)

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
Reclassification of holding gains		(54,760	)		(32,000	)		(5,800	)		(92,000	)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	$	12,669		$	(210,499	)	$	(88,176	)	$	(538,781	)

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE -
BASIC AND DILUTED	$	0.01		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED		8,657,124			8,669,670			8,657,124			8,669,670

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

	2010			2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
REVENUE	$	15,000			37,485
COST OF REVENUE		-			-
GROSS PROFIT		15,000			37,485
OPERATING EXPENSES
Salaries and wages		72,141			106,996
Selling, general and administrative expenses		61,033			48,680
Professional fees		27,586			95,486
Depreciation and amortization expense		27,241			11,965
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		188,001			263,127
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(173,001	)		(225,642	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
Interest expense		(8,881	)		-
Dividend and interest income, net		17,325			20,357
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities		3,260			(138,779	)
Realized gain (loss) on marketable securities		7,492			65,236
Other income		4,000			10,546
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)		23,196			(42,640	)
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		(149,805	)		(268,282	)
INCOME TAX BENEFIT		-			-
NET LOSS	$	(149,805	)	$	(268,282	)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities		48,960			108,000
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS		(100,845	)		(160,282	)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON EQUIVALENT
SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED		8,657,124			8,669,670
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

VALUERICH, Inc.

VALUERICH, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)

	2010			2009
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(82,376	)	$	(446,781	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		43,248			24,821
Unrealized net loss on marketable securities		-			71,193
Realized gain on sale of marketable securities		(57,207	)		(73,150	)
Amortization of deferred financing costs		7,280			-
Amortization of debt discount		13,144
Value of warrants granted for consulting services		-			18,395
Accrued interest on note receivable - related party		(26,163	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in trade accounts receivable		-			1,713
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets		-			12,357
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		64,593			(2,697	)
Decrease in deferred revenue		(15,000	)		(15,000	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(52,481	)		(409,149	)

CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of fixed assets		-			(356,336	)
Purchase of marketable securities		-			(929,423	)
Net investment in real estate		(842,103	)		-
Investment in note receivable		(791,927	)		-
Principal payments on note receivable		120,000
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities		659,267			2,247,235
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(854,763	)		961,476

CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of notes payable		-			(9,500	)
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable		225,000			-
Payment of financing costs related to issuance of notes payable		(33,560	)		-
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		191,440			(9,500	)

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH AND EQUIVALENTS		(715,804	)		542,827

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of period		1,034,848			920,908

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of period	$	319,044		$	1,463,735

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-		$	2,500
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009

										Accumulated
							Additional			Other						Total
	Common Stock						Paid-in			Comprehensive			Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares			Amount			Capital			Income			Deficit			Equity
Balance, December 31, 2008		8,669,670		$	86,696		$	7,175,789		$	108,000		$	(4,673,248	)	$	2,697,237
Value of warrants granted for consulting services		-			-			18,395			-			-			18,395
Retirement of treasury stock		(12,546	)		(125	)		(3,373	)		-			-			(3,498	)
Unrealized loss on sale of available-for-sale securities		-			-			-			(88,200	)		-			(88,200	)
Realized loss on available-for-sale securities		-			-			-			(14,000	)		-			(14,000	)
Net loss for period		-			-			-			-			(623,309	)		(623,309	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		8,657,124		$	86,571		$	7,190,811		$	5,800		$	(5,296,557	)	$	1,986,625
Realized net gain on available-for-sale securities		-			-			-			48,960			-			48,960
Net loss for period		-			-			-			-			(149,805	)		(149,805	)
Balance, March 31, 2010 (unaudited)		8,657,124		$	86,571		$	7,190,811		$	54,760		$	(5,446,362	)	$	1,885,780
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

VALUERICH, Inc.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009

	2010			2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(149,805	)	$	(268,282	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		27,240			11,965
Unrealized net loss on marketable securities		-			138,779
Unrealized net gain on marketable securities		3,260			-
Realized gain on sale of marketable securities		7,492			(65,236	)
Marketable securities received for consulting services		-			-
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,492			-
Amortization of debt discount		4,381
Value of warants granted for consulting services		-			18,395
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:					-
Trade accounts receivable		-			(10,371	)
Prepaid expenses		-			21,778
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(9,945	)		3,822
Deferred revenue		(15,000	)		(7,500	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(129,885	)		(156,650	)
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of fixed assets		-			(328,181	)
Purchase of marketable securities		-			(929,423	)
Investment in real estate		(820,432	)		-
Investment in note receivable		(791,927	)		-
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities		582,511			2,251,103
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(1,029,848	)		993,499
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of note payable		200,000			-
Payment of financing costs of note payable		(18,305	)		-
Payment of offering costs for future debt offering		(9,755	)		-
Net cash used in financing activities		171,940			-
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS		(987,793	)		836,849
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of period		1,034,848			920,908
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of period	$	47,055		$	1,757,757
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation

~~The~~In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements ~~have~~of ~~been prepared by~~ ValueRich, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) incontain ~~accordance~~all ~~with~~adjustments ~~generally~~necessary ~~accepted~~to ~~accounting~~present ~~principles~~fairly ~~for~~the ~~interim~~Company’s financial ~~information~~position ~~and~~as ~~pursuant~~of toJune ~~the~~30, ~~rules~~2010 and ~~regulations~~December of31, ~~the~~2009 ~~Securities~~ and ~~Exchange~~its ~~Commission. . All~~results ~~intercompany~~of ~~accounts~~operations ~~and~~for ~~transactions~~the ~~have~~three ~~been~~and ~~eliminated~~six ~~within~~months ~~the~~ended ~~consolidation. Accordingly~~June 30, ~~these~~2010 ~~consolidated~~and ~~financial~~2009 ~~statements~~and docash ~~not~~flows ~~include~~for ~~all of~~ the ~~disclosures~~six ~~required~~months byended ~~accounting~~June ~~principles~~30, ~~generally~~2010 ~~accepted~~and in2009. ~~the~~The ~~United~~significant ~~States~~accounting ofpolicies ~~America~~followed ~~for~~by ~~complete~~the ~~financial~~Company ~~statements.~~are Inset ~~the~~forth ~~opinion~~in ofNote ~~management,~~1 to the ~~unaudited~~Company’s ~~interim~~ consolidated financial statements ~~furnished~~included ~~herein~~in ~~include~~its ~~all~~Annual ~~adjustments,~~Report ~~all~~on ofForm ~~which~~10-K ~~are~~for ofthe ayear ~~normal~~ended ~~recurring~~December ~~nature~~31, ~~necessary~~2009, ~~for~~which ais ~~fair~~incorporated ~~statement~~herein ofby ~~the~~reference, ~~results~~and ~~for~~as ~~the~~they ~~interim~~relate ~~period~~to ~~presented. Although management believes~~ the ~~disclosures~~Company’s ~~and~~real ~~information~~estate ~~presented~~activities, ~~are~~which ~~adequate~~began toin ~~make the information not misleading~~2010, itare isset ~~suggested~~forth ~~that~~below. The ~~these~~accompanying unaudited interim ~~condensed~~ financial statements behave ~~read~~been prepared in ~~conjunction~~accordance with ~~the~~instructions ~~Company's~~to ~~audited~~Form ~~financial~~10-Q ~~statements~~ and ~~notes~~therefore ~~included~~do innot ~~the~~include ~~Company’s~~all ~~Annual~~information ~~Report~~and onfootnotes ~~Form~~required ~~10-K/A~~by ~~for~~accounting ~~the~~principles ~~year~~generally ~~ended~~accepted ~~December~~in ~~31,~~the ~~2009~~United States of America. ~~Operating~~ The results of operations for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results ~~that~~to ~~may~~ be expected for the ~~year~~full ~~ending December 31, 2010~~year.

Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ~~(GAAP)~~ requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, management expectations for future performance, and other assumptions as appropriate. Key areas affected by estimates include the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets, which is based on such factors as estimated future cash flows. The Company re-evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis; actual results may vary from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements (“financial statements”) include the accounts of ValueRich, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries; Tesoro Preserve Development, LLC, Tesoro Preserve Opportunity Fund, LLC, VR Circle Holdings, LLC, and VR Premier Holdings, LLC and have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, under the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Investment in Real Estate Held for Development and Sale

Costs incurred that are directly attributable to the acquisition, development, and construction of real estate are capitalized. The carrying amount of real estate under development and held for sale is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the real estate may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the real estate is not recoverable. The carrying amount is not recoverable if it exceeds the undiscounted sum of cash flows expected to result from the disposition of the real estate. If the carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the real estate over its fair value. There have been no events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying amount of the real estate may not be recoverable.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue and profit in full on the sale of real estate when 1) a sale is consummated as indicated by a binding agreement, the exchange of all consideration, arrangement of permanent financing, if any, and all conditions precedent to the closing having been met; 2) the buyer’s commitment to pay has been demonstrated and collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will not be collected can be reasonably estimated; 3) any receivable from the buyer is collateralized by the property and not subject to subordination other than by existing or contemplated liens; and 4) the Company has transferred the usual risks and rewards of ownership to the buyer, is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale without compensation, and does not otherwise have substantial continuing involvement in the property.

The Company recognizes consulting revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, performance has occurred according to the terms of the consulting agreement, the price is fixed and determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.

Deferred Financing Costs

Direct costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt are capitalized and amortized into expenses over the term of the related debt.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject usthe Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist of cash and cash equivalents ~~and accounts receivables~~. The Company ~~placed~~places its cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions ~~and~~which at times may ~~have~~exceed ~~exceeded~~ the FDIC insurance limit. The Company extends credit based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition, generally without collateral. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on each customer’s financial condition. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses, as required. Accounts are “written-off” when deemed uncollectible. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had deposits in excess of FDIC limits totaling $013,149 and $784,848, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and cash in time deposits, certificates of deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less.

Marketable Securities

The Company has designated its investments in marketable securities as trading and available-for-sale. Marketable securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings. Marketable equity securities not classified as trading are classified as available for sale, and are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income and reported in ~~shareholders~~stockholders’ equity. Investment income is recognized on an accrual basis.

7The fair value of all securities is determined by quoted market prices. The estimated fair value of securities for which there are no quoted market prices, if any, is based on similar types of securities that are traded in the market.

The fair value of all securities is determined by quoted market prices. The estimated fair value of securities for which there are no quoted market prices is based on similar types of securities that are traded in the market.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at historical cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The useful life and depreciation method are reviewed periodically to ensure that the depreciation method and period are consistent with the anticipated pattern of future economic benefits. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred while renewals and betterments are capitalized. Gains and losses on disposals are included in the results of operations.

The Company provides for depreciation over the assets’ estimated lives as follows:

Computers, software and equipment			3 years
Furniture and fixtures			5 years
Leasehold improvements			Lesser of lease life or economic life

Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets

The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost of disposal. Based on its review, the Company believes that, as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were no significant impairments of its long-lived assets.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

●· Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. ● Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. ● Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

8· Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

~~The~~· ~~Company’s investments in marketable securities are carried at fair value totaling $77,760 and $607,860 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Company used~~ Level 13 inputs ~~for~~to ~~its~~the valuation methodology asare ~~the~~unobservable ~~securities’~~and ~~quoted~~significant ~~prices~~to ~~are~~the ~~publicly~~fair ~~available~~value measurement.

	Fair Value As of March 31, 2010		Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2010 Using Fair Value Hierarchy
Assets			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investments in marketable securities	$	77,760	$	77,760		-		-

The Company’s investments in marketable securities are carried at fair value totaling $607,860 at December 31, 2009. The Company held no marketable securities as of June 30, 2010. The Company used Level 1 inputs for its valuation methodology as the securities’ quoted prices are publicly available.

For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recognized net unrealized gains on its trading securities in its statements of operations in the amounts of $3,260. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized net unrealized losses on its trading securities in its statements of operations in the amount of $138,779.

The Company did not identify any other assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815.

Revenue Recognition

For revenue from product sales, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”. Revenue is recognized at the date of shipment to customers, the price is fixed or determinable, the delivery is completed, no other significant obligations of the Company exist and collectability is reasonably assured. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. We defer any revenue for which the product has not been delivered or is subject to refund until such time that we and the customer jointly determine that the product has been delivered or no refund will be required. Payments received in advance are deferred until the product is delivered or service is rendered.

In 2008, the Company has focused on the transition from its old line of financial media products including the ValueRich financial Expos and the ValueRich Magazine to web-based products such as www.WallStreetHDTV.com, the second generation of www.iValueRich.com and www.ValueRichTV.com, which was launched during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The Company has not earned any revenue from its old line of financial media products during the year ended December 31, 2009.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, we entered into two consulting agreements to assist foreign-based companies in managing their financial statement reporting, regulatory and compliance issues in the United States. During 2009, we continued to assist these companies in managing their financial statement reporting. We do not recognize revenue on its consulting business until persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred (we have performed according to the terms of the consulting agreement), the selling price is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided based upon the asset and liability method of accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”. The Company is required to compute deferred income tax assets for net operating losses carried forward. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be realized or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed throughout the year and a valuation allowance is recorded if necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be realized. The potential benefits of net operating losses (“NOLs”) have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

The Company has an NOL carry forward for income tax reporting purposes that may be offset against future taxable income. Current tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Accordingly, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited. No tax benefit has been reported in the financial statements, because the Company is uncertain if they will ever be in a position to utilize the NOL carry forward. Accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the loss carry forward are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

The Company is current in its filing of federal income tax returns. The Company believes that the statutes of limitations for its federal income tax returns are open for years after ~~2004~~2006. The Company is not currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service or any other taxing authority.

The Company’s practice is to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. AtAs ~~March~~of 31June, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties.

Basic and Diluted Losses Per Share

Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with the FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share.” Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. All dilutive securities were excluded from the diluted loss per share due to the anti-diluted effect.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the following potential dilutive shares were excluded from diluted loss per share for all periods presented because of their anti-dilutive effect.

		March 31, 2010 (unaudited)		December 31, 2009
	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Options	100,000		100,000		~~100,000~~
Warrants	1,235,715		1,235,715		~~1,235,715~~
Convertible notes	67,000		67,000		~~67,000~~
Total	1,402,715		1,402,715		~~1,402,715~~

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” ASC 718 requires companies to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value at the grant date and recognize the expense over the employee’s requisite service period. Under ASC 718, the Company’s volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock or the expected volatility of similar companies. The expected life assumption is primarily based on historical exercise patterns and employee post-vesting termination behavior. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which was developed for use in estimating the fair value of options. Option-pricing models require the input of highly complex and subjective variables including the expected life of options granted and the Company’s expected stock price volatility over a period equal to or greater than the expected life of the options. Because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value of the Company’s employee stock options, it is management’s opinion that the Black-Scholes option-pricing model may not provide an accurate measure of the fair value of the Company’s employee stock options. Although the fair value of employee stock options is determined in accordance with ASC 718 using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.

The Company recognizes in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and non-employees.

~~Recent~~Recently ~~Pronouncements~~Issued Accounting Standards

OnIn ~~February~~January ~~25,~~ 2010, the ~~FASB~~Financial ~~issued~~Accounting ~~ASU~~Standards ~~2010-09~~Board ~~Subsequent Events Topic 855~~ (“~~Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,~~FASB”) ~~effective~~issued ~~immediately.~~Accounting ~~The~~Standards ~~amendments~~Update ~~in the~~ (“ASU”) ~~remove~~2010-06, ~~the~~“Improving ~~requirement~~Disclosures ~~for~~about anFair ~~SEC~~Value ~~filer~~Measurements,” ~~to disclose a date through~~ which ~~subsequent~~clarifies ~~events~~certain ~~have~~existing ~~been~~requirements ~~evaluated~~ in ~~both~~ASC ~~issued~~820 ~~and~~“Fair ~~revised~~Value ~~financial~~Measurements ~~statements.~~and ~~Revised~~Disclosures,” ~~financial~~and ~~statements~~requires ~~include~~disclosures ~~financial~~related ~~statements~~to ~~revised~~significant astransfers abetween ~~result~~each oflevel ~~either~~and ~~correction~~additional ofinformation anabout ~~error~~Level or3 ~~retrospective~~activity. FASB ~~application~~ASU of2010-06 ~~U.S.~~begins ~~GAAP.~~phasing ~~The~~in ~~FASB~~the ~~believes~~first ~~these~~fiscal ~~amendments~~period ~~remove~~beginning ~~potential~~after ~~conflicts~~December ~~with~~15, ~~the~~2009. The ~~SEC~~Company’s ~~literature. The~~ adoption of this ~~ASU~~guidance did not have aan ~~material~~ impact on ~~the~~its ~~Company’s consolidated~~ financial statements and disclosures.

In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance on “Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements,” updating ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition.” This standard provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. The guidance is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact, if any, of its adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASC 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition.” This guidance changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements that are “essential to the functionality,” and scopes these products out of current software revenue guidance. The new guidance will include factors to help companies determine what software elements are considered “essential to the functionality.” The amendments will now subject software-enabled products to other revenue guidance and disclosure requirements, such as guidance surrounding revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. The amendments in this guidance are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact of its adoption on its financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU 2010-09, “Subsequent Events, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements,” which clarifies certain existing evaluation and disclosure requirements in ASC 855 “Subsequent Events” related to subsequent events. FASB ASU 2010-09 requires SEC filers to evaluate subsequent events through the date in which the financial statements are issued and is effective immediately.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. This ASU codifies the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 08-9, “Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.” The amendments to the Codification provide guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. Consideration that is contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is judged to meet certain criteria to be considered substantive. Milestones should be considered substantive in their entirety and may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones, and each milestone should be evaluated individually to determine if it is substantive. ASU 2010-17 is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year, the entity should apply 2010-17 retrospectively from the beginning of the year of adoption. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on its financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB has issued ASU No. 2010-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Accounting for Certain Tax Effects of the 2010 Health Care Reform Acts. This ASU updates the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the SEC Staff Announcement, Accounting for the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This announcement provides guidance on the accounting effect, if any, that arises from the different signing dates between the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which is a reconciliation bill that amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (collectively the "Acts"). This application of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 – Marketable Securities

The Company invests its available operating funds primarily in high-yield mutual funds that hold common stock of U.S. companies with large market capitalizations. The Company also invests in common stock of U.S. companies with large market capitalizations. Management’s objective is to identify common stocks and mutual funds with holdings that are under-valued with potential for short-term (under one-year holding period) appreciation. The Company’s marketable securities consist of trading and available-for-sale securities, all of which are classified as marketable securities and are carried at their fair value based on the quoted market prices of the securities ~~at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2010~~. Net unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are included in net earnings. Available-for sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of ~~stockholder's~~stockholders’ equity. The investment in the available-for-sale securities has been valued at $77,760 at March 31, 2010, and accordingly a $54,760 net unrealized gain has been recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at March 31, 2010 in the accompanying balance sheets. Realized gains and losses on trading and available-for-sale securities are included in net earnings in the period earned or incurred. For the purpose of determining realized gains and losses, the cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. The Company did not hold any marketable securities as of June 30, 2010.

~~The~~Investment ~~composition~~income offor ~~marketable~~the ~~securities,~~three ~~classified~~and assix ~~current~~months ~~assets,~~ended isJune ~~as follows at March 31~~30, 2010 and ~~December~~2009 ~~31,~~consists ~~2009.~~of the following:

	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010	2009	2010	2009
Gross realized gains from sale of trading securities	$49,715	$ 7,914	$ 57,207	$ 177,545
Gross realized losses from sale of trading securities	-	-	-	(104,395)
Dividend and interest income	13,829	19,516	31,154	39,873
Reclassification of holding gain (loss)	(3,260)	67,586	-	(71,193)
Net investment income	$60,284	$ 95,016	$ 88,361	$ 41,830

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a yearly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and amount of the loss relative to cost, the nature and financial condition of the issuer and the ability and intent of the Company to hold the investment for a time sufficient to allow any anticipated recovery in fair value. There were no securities with unrealized losses that management considers to be other-than-temporary impairments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

There were no purchases of marketable securities during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

	March 31, 2010
			Gross Unrealized		Gross Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities	$	23,000	$	59,760		(5,000	)	$	77,760
Mutual Funds				-		-			-
Common Stock		-		-		-			-
Total marketable securities	$	23,000	$	59,760	$	(5,000	)	$	77,760
	December 31, 2009
			Gross Unrealized		Gross Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Available-for-sale securities	$	23,000	$	10,800	$	(5,000	)	$	28,800
Mutual Funds		438,104		87,740		-			525,844
Common Stock		26,574		26,642		-			53,216
Total marketable securities	$	487,678	$	125,182	$	(5,000	)	$	607,860

Proceeds from the sale of investments in trading securities were $659,267 and $2,247,235 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $76,756 and $10,447 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

~~Investment~~Note ~~income~~4 – ~~for~~Note ~~the~~Receivable ~~three~~– ~~months~~Related ~~ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 consists of the following:~~Party

	Three months ended March 31,
	2010		2009
Gross realized gains from sale of trading securities	$	7,492	$	171,187
Gross realized losses from sale of trading securities		-		(105,951	)
Dividend and interest income		17,325		20,357
Net unrealized holding gain		3,260		(138,779	)
Net investment income	$	28,077	$	(53,186	)

On January 19, 2010, the Company entered into a four year 8% note receivable agreement with Tesoro Preserve Property Owners Association Inc. (“POA”), with monthly payments of principal and interest totaling $15,000 commencing on February 19, 2010. The note agreement required an initial payment of principal in the amount of $120,000, which was received by the Company during the three months ended June 30, 2010. Any unpaid principal or interest is due in full upon the earlier of January 14, 2014 or the turnover of the development to the property owners. Upon the event of default, interest will be accrued based on 15% from the date of default. As of June 30, 2010 the note receivable balance was $698,090. The Company’s chief executive officer is the chairman of the board of directors of the POA.

~~Management~~Note ~~evaluates~~5 ~~securities~~– ~~for~~Notes other-than-temporary impairment at least on a yearly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and amount of the loss relative to cost, the nature and financial condition of the issuer and the ability and intent of the Company to hold the investment for a time sufficient to allow any anticipated recovery in fair value. There were no securities with unrealized losses that management considers to be other-than-temporary impairments at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.Payable

~~There~~Notes ~~were~~payable noas ~~purchases~~ of ~~marketable~~June ~~securities~~30, ~~during~~2010 ~~the~~and ~~three~~2009 ~~months~~consist ~~ended~~of ~~March~~the ~~31, 2010.~~following:

Proceeds from the sale of investments in trading securities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $582,511 and $2,254,348, respectively.

	2010	2009

On February 10, 2010, the Company issued a 6% one-year promissory note in the amount of $200,000. Accrued interest is due on a monthly basis commencing on March 10, 2010. Any unpaid interest and outstanding principal balance is payable and due on the earlier of February 10, 2011 or when the Company raises a minimum of $1,500,000 of Investor capital. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company incurred $18,305 of financing costs which will be amortized over the one-year term of the note. The Company also agreed to issue to the holder 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company allocated $35,052 of the net proceeds from the note to the common stock based on their relative fair value on the date of the note issuance. The fair value of the common stock was based on quoted market prices and the amount allocated to the common stock is recorded as a discount which will be amortized into expense over the one-year term of the note. The carrying amount as of June 30, 2010 is net of unamortized discount of $21,908.	$ 178,092	$ -

On June 18, 2010, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $25,000 pursuant to a private placement offering (“Offering”) by its wholly owned subsidiary, Tesoro Preserve Opportunity Fund, LLC (“the Fund”). The proceeds of the note were used to acquire “build ready” home lots, located within the Tesoro Preserve Development that are either bank owned, in foreclosure, or impaired by liens. The note bears interest at an annual rate of 8% and matures in June 2013 unless repaid early as allowed by the terms of the note. The holder of note is entitled to 50% of a pro rate share of the profits of the Fund after repayment of all outstanding principle and interest to all investors in the Offering. Pursuant to the Offering, the Company will issue to the holder of the note, 10,000 shares of common stock. The Company allocated $1,193 of the net proceeds from the note to the common stock based on their relative fair value on the date of the note issuance. The fair value of the common stock was based on quoted market prices and the amount allocated to the common stock is recorded as a discount which will be amortized into expense over the three-year term of the note. The carrying amount as of June 30, 2010 is net of unamortized discount of $1,193.	23,807	-
Total	201,899	-
Less current portion	(178,092)	-
	$ 23,807	$ -

Note 4 6 – ~~Note~~Convertible ~~Receivable~~Debt

OnIn ~~January~~October 192004, ~~2010,~~ the Company ~~entered~~issued ~~into~~ a ~~four~~convertible ~~year 8%~~ note ~~receivable~~in ~~agreement~~the ~~with~~amount ~~Tesoro~~of ~~Preserve~~$25,000. The ~~Property~~note ~~Owners~~bears ~~Association~~interest ~~Inc.,~~at ~~with~~an ~~monthly~~annual ~~payments~~rate of ~~principal~~6%, ~~and~~matured ~~interest~~in ~~totaling~~December ~~$15~~2007,~~000~~ ~~commencing~~and onis ~~February~~currently ~~19,~~in ~~2010~~default. ~~Any~~ ~~unpaid~~The ~~principal~~note ~~or interest~~ is ~~due~~convertible ininto ~~full~~common ~~upon~~stock of the ~~earlier~~Company at a conversion price of ~~January~~$0.60 ~~14,~~per ~~2010~~share orin conjunction with the ~~turnover~~issuance of the ~~development~~note, to the ~~property~~Company ~~owners. Upon~~also issued a warrant to purchase the ~~event~~same number of ~~default,~~shares ~~interest~~into ~~will~~which bethe ~~accrued~~original ~~based~~principal onamount ~~15%~~could ~~from~~be ~~the~~converted ~~date~~at an exercise price of ~~default~~$2. As00 ofper ~~March~~share. The ~~31,~~balance ~~2010~~of the note ~~reicevable~~as ~~balance~~of ~~was~~June 30, 2010 and 2009 totaled $~~804~~25,~~251~~000.

Note 5 7 – ~~Property~~Related ~~and~~Party ~~Equipment~~Transactions

~~Property~~Operating ~~and equipment consisted of the following at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:~~Lease

	March 31, 2010 (unaudited)			December 31, 2009
Building	$	225,682		$	225,682
Computers and equipment		140,848			140,848
Furniture and fixtures		33,427			33,427
Leasehold improvements		84,023			89,875
Website		71,745			71,745
		555,725			561,577
Accumulated depreciation		(158,029	)		(136,641	)
Fixed assets, net	$	397,696		$	424,936

In January 2009, the Company entered into a one-year lease agreement with Joseph C. Visconti, CEO and President of the Company, to lease a 1,750 square foot office facility for $3,190 per month ($38,280 per year) commencing January 1, 2009 and terminating on December 31, 2009. The Company has renewed the lease for an additional year commencing on January 1, 2010. Rent expense was $12,819 and $9,570 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $22,464 and $19,140 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

~~Depreciation~~Investment ~~expense~~in ~~amounted~~Real ~~to $27,240 and $11,965 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively~~Estate

~~Note~~In 6June –2010, ~~Accounts~~the ~~Payable~~Company ~~and~~paid ~~Accrued~~$15,200 ~~Expenses~~to an affiliated entity that acquired senior rights to certain properties within the Tesoro Preserve Development that are either bank owned, in foreclosure, or impaired by liens. Pursuant to its agreement with the affiliated entity, the Company’s payment will be applied to the Company’s acquisition of certain real estate properties to which the affiliated entity will obtain title to pursuant to rights held. These amounts are included in investment in real estate on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

~~Accrued~~Note ~~expenses~~8 ~~and~~– ~~other~~Stockholders’ ~~liabilities comprises of the following:~~Equity

	March 31, 2010 (unaudited)		December 31, 2009
Acounts payable	$	158,000	$	158,119
Accrued interest		9,508		7,500
Other accrued expenses		64,145		14,400
Total	$	231,653	$	180,019

The Company did not issue shares of its common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Note 7 – Operating Lease and Other Commitments

In January 2009, the Company entered into a one year lease agreement with Joseph C. Visconti, CEO and President, to lease a 1,750 square foot office facility for $3,190 per month ($38,280 per year) commencing January 1, 2009 and terminating on December 31, 2009. The Company has renewed the lease for the 2010 for one year. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, rent expense was $38,280 and $36,000, respectively.

~~Note~~Obligations 8to –Issue ~~Promissory~~Common ~~Note~~Stock

OnAs ~~February 10, 2010, the Company issued a 6% promissory note for one year in the amount~~ of ~~$200,000.~~ ~~Accrued~~June ~~interest is due on a monthly basis commencing on March 10~~30, 2010~~. Any unpaid interest and outstanding principal balance is payable and due on February 10~~, ~~2011 or when~~ the Company ~~raises~~is aobligated ~~minimum of $1,500,000 of Investor capital, which ever event transpires first. The Company had capitalized $18,305 in connection~~ to ~~the~~issue ~~issuance of the note payable and will amortize the financing costs based on the term of the note of one year. In lieu of the note~~960, ~~the holder will be issued 250,~~000 shares of ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~ common stock~~. The~~ ~~Company fair valued the cost of these shares at the date of note issuance and recorded~~ a ~~discount in the amount of $35,052 which will be amortized based on the life of note of one year.~~follows:

The Company had recorded interest expense relating to the note payable of $4,125 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

	Number of Shares	Amount
On January 20, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 600,000 shares of common stock to the Assignor of rights as part of the Company’s acquisition of the Tesoro Preserve Development. The shares were value based on the trading price of the shares on the date of the agreement.	600,000	$132,000
On February 10, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 250,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the issuance of a note payable in the amount of $200,000. The Company allocated $35,052 of the net proceeds from the note to the common stock based on their relative fair value on the date of the note issuance.	250,000	35,052
On May 19, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consultant agreement for the financial reporting services. The shares were value based on the trading price of the shares on the date of the agreement.	100,000	19,000
On June 18, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 10,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the issuance of a note payable in the amount of $25,000. The Company allocated $1,193 of the net proceeds from the note to the common stock based on their relative fair value on the date of the note issuance.	10,000	1,193
Total	960,000	$187,245

The ~~Company~~above ~~had~~amounts ~~amortized~~will ~~$4,381~~be ofreclassed ~~the~~to ~~debt~~stockholders’ ~~discount~~equity ~~for~~upon ~~the three months ended March 31, 2010~~issuance.

Note 9 – ~~Debt~~Warrants

	March 31, 2010 (unaudited)		December 31, 2009
Convertible Notes Payable:
Note payable to an individual 6% interest accrued, Issued 10/04, convertible Matured 12/07 (in default)		25,000		25,000

In addition to the information stated above, other material terms of the convertible debt instruments include: 1) a conversion price of $0.60 per share; 2) a debt penalty to include the issuance of additional shares upon conversion totaling 10% of the shares into which the note may convert if the Company’s shares are not listed for public trading on or before October 1, 2004; and 3) a warrant to purchase the same number of shares into which the original principal amount could be converted at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. As the convertible note payable is in default at March 31, 2010, the Company has classified the note as short-term in its accompanying balance sheets.

The Company has adopted FASB ASC 470-20 “Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” During 2004 and 2005 we incurred debt with a conversion feature that provides for a rate of conversion, but with no trading market value there was no beneficial conversion feature to record.

The Company recorded $375 and $613 in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Note 10 – Equity

The Company did not issue shares of its common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Note 11 – Warrants

On March 19, 2009, the Company granted a warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of its common stock at $0.25 per share in connection with consulting services. The warrant was valued at $18,395 using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 184%; (3) risk-free interest rate of 0.87%, and expected life of 2 years.

The following table summarizes the changes in warrants outstanding and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to non-employees of the Company. These warrants were granted in connection with the convertible shareholder notes payable and for consulting services.

A summary of warrant activity for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 is presented below:

	Number of Warrants	~~Number of Warrants~~	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)	~~Weighted Average Exercise Price~~		~~Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)~~
Outstanding, January 1, 2008			2,376,494			$	2.00		0.37
Outstanding January 1, 2010	1,235,715		$1.55		1.82
Granted	-		~~200,000~~-		-		~~0.55~~
Exercised	-		-		-		-
Expired	-		~~(1,390,779~~-	)	-		~~1.89~~
Outstanding, December 31, 2008			1,185,715				1.61		2.59
Outstanding	1,235,715		1.55		1.32
Exercisable, December 31, 2008			1,185,715				1.61		2.59
Exercisable	1,235,715		$1.55		1.32
Outstanding, January 1, 2009			1,235,715				1.61		2.59
Granted			-				-		-
Exercised			-				-		-
Expired			-				-		-
Outstanding, March 31, 2010 (unaudited)			1,235,715				1.55		1.32
Exercisable, March 31, 2010 (unaudited)			1,235,715			$	1.55		1.32

~~Note 11 – Related Party Transactions~~14

~~The~~Note ~~Company~~10 ~~leases~~– ~~a 1,750 square foot office facility at $3,190 per month ($38,280 per year) from Joseph C. Visconti CEO and President. See Note 7.~~Litigation

~~Note~~In ~~13 –~~June ~~Subsequent~~2010, ~~Events~~the Company commenced litigation against China Pharmaceuticals, a publicly traded company for breach of contract and other related claims. The Company alleges that it is entitled to ownership of 20% of the outstanding shares of China Pharmaceuticals pursuant to a May 2009 Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) between the Company and Xian Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, the Chinese-based operating company for China Pharmaceuticals (collectively, “China Pharmaceuticals”).

~~The~~Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, the Company ~~has~~agreed ~~performed~~to anprovide ~~evaluation~~assistance ofto ~~subsequent~~China ~~events~~Pharmaceuticals ~~through~~in ~~May~~connection ~~14,~~with ~~2010,~~their ~~which~~desire isto become a publicly traded company in the ~~date~~United States. In exchange, China Pharmaceuticals agreed to compensate the ~~consolidated~~Company ~~financial~~with, ~~statements~~among ~~were~~other ~~issued~~things, the issuance and notransfer ~~additional~~of ~~significant~~20% ~~subsequent~~of ~~events~~the ~~warrant~~shares ~~disclosure~~of the proposed newly formed public company.

In July of 2009, upon the filing of a Form-S1 registration statement under the guidance of the Company, China Pharmaceuticals was fully positioned to become a publicly traded company, accomplishing the goals and objectives of the parties set forth in the Consulting Agreement. However, despite the Company’s good faith performance under the Consulting Agreement, the public offering contemplated by China Pharmaceuticals was never consummated. Instead, China Pharmaceuticals terminated the agreement, cancelled shares validly issued to the Company in the proposed new public company, and then preceded to go public through another source while refusing to compensate the Company.

The Company believes that the attempted “termination” by China Pharmaceuticals is a transparent attempt to circumvent their obligations to the Company in connection with the Consulting Agreement. In 2008, China Pharmaceuticals, with the assistance of the Company, converted its ownership structure to become wholly foreign-owned enterprise (“WFOE”) through the organization of Xian Development Co., Ltd. (“Xian Development”) as a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (“WFOE”) organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China. Xian Development was wholly owned by China Qinba Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“China Qinba”), its holding company in the United States. China Qinba later merged with a Nevada public corporation known as Allstar Restaurants, which changed its name to China Pharmaceuticals. Thus, the Company alleges that Xian Pharmaceuticals and China Pharmaceuticals have reaped the full benefit of the services provided by the Company under the Consulting Agreement to become a publicly traded company in the United States. The Company therefore seeks full compensation for the services it provided.

Note 11 – Subsequent Events

In July 2010, the Company successfully negotiated a decrease in the amount of funds required to satisfy certain obligations assumed as part of its acquisition of the Tesoro Preserve Development. As result of this decreased obligation, the Company received a payment in the amount of $544,137 from the South Florida Water Management District representing a release of amounts previously escrowed to satisfy the assumed obligations.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Financial Statements and related notes. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent liabilities at the financial statement date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis we review our estimates and assumptions. Our estimates are based on our historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results are likely to differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies, the policies we believe are most important to the presentation of our financial statements and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, are outlined below in ‘‘Critical Accounting Policies,’’ and have not changed significantly.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made in this report may constitute “forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events”. These forward-looking statements involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions. These statements are based on our current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that the expectations reflected-in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, other than as required by law. In light of these assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, the forward-looking events discussed in this report might not occur and actual results and events may vary significantly from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.

General

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in our Form 10K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The discussion of results, causes and trends should not be construed to imply any conclusion that such results or trends will necessarily continue in the future.

Our Corporate History

ValueRich, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“the Company”), ~~was~~have ~~incorporated~~recently ~~under~~completed ~~the~~a ~~laws~~transition of ~~the~~its ~~state~~core ofbusiness ~~Florida~~strategy. ValueRich onis ~~July~~engaged 11in the investment, ~~2003~~development and ~~reincorporated~~management inof ~~Delaware~~real onestate ~~March~~assets 3located in Port St. Lucie, ~~2006~~Florida. WeIn ~~began~~early asJanuary aof ~~financial~~2010 ~~media~~ValueRich ~~company~~and ~~owning~~its ~~various~~wholly ~~online~~owned ~~and~~subsidiary, ~~offline~~VR ~~media-based~~Preserve ~~properties~~Development, ~~for~~LLC ~~corporate~~(the ~~and~~“VR ~~financial~~Preserve”), ~~professionals.~~acquired ~~Its~~Tesoro ~~properties~~Preserve ~~included~~Development 1)assets ~~iValueRich~~located in Port St.~~com~~ Lucie, 2)Florida. The ~~ValueRich~~Tesoro ~~magazine~~Preserve ~~and~~Development 3)is ~~the~~a ~~ValueRich~~private ~~Small~~350-~~cap~~acre ~~Financial~~community ~~Expo.~~with ~~Until~~440 ~~December~~individual ~~2008,~~home ~~ValueRich~~sites ~~magazine~~in ~~was~~St. ~~published~~Lucie ~~approximately~~County, ~~three~~Florida. Included ~~times~~in ~~per~~the ~~year~~asset ~~and~~purchase was asix ~~glossy~~(6) ~~full~~waterfront single-~~color~~family ~~magazine~~residential oflots, ~~approximately~~seventy-six ~~120~~(76) ~~pages~~single ~~that~~family ~~was~~residential ~~geared~~lots, ~~toward~~approximately anseven ~~affluent~~(7) ~~readership~~acres of ~~investment~~commercially zoned land adjacent to the residential community, and certain related ~~professionals~~Appurtenances, Improvements, Personal Property, Intangible Property, development rights, and ~~corporate~~a ~~leaders.~~builder’s Inroyalty program associated with the ~~first~~Tesoro ~~quarter~~Preserve Development. As of ~~2009~~this date, ~~the~~ValueRich ~~Company~~still ~~transitioned~~retains ownership of its media ~~business~~based toproperties including a ~~web-based~~dedicated ~~business~~studio ~~model~~building with no mortgage and all the video and editing equipment related to the creation, production and distribution of the Company’s previously produced media based content.

ByValueRich, ~~the first quarter of 2009~~Inc., wewas ~~had~~incorporated ~~launched~~under the ~~second~~laws ~~generation~~ of the ~~iValueRich~~state ~~media~~of ~~platform,~~Florida ~~which~~on ~~added~~July a11, ~~full~~2003 ~~spectrum~~and ofreincorporated ~~financial~~in ~~and~~Delaware ~~web-based~~on ~~tools~~March ~~for~~3, ~~small-cap~~2006. We ~~companies~~began ~~seeking~~as toa gofinancial ~~public~~media orcompany ~~raise~~owning ~~capital~~various ~~via~~online aand ~~web~~offline media-based ~~Direct~~properties ~~Public~~for ~~Offering~~corporate ~~(“DPO”)~~and ~~format~~financial professionals. InIts ~~addition~~properties toincluded ~~the~~1) ~~web-based~~iValueRich.com, ~~network~~2) ~~banking~~ValueRich ~~platform,~~magazine weand ~~created~~3) athe ~~business~~ValueRich ~~talk~~Small-cap ~~show~~Financial ~~called~~Expo. ~~The~~Until ~~Money~~December ~~Bunker~~2008, ~~which~~ValueRich magazine was ~~produced~~published atapproximately athree ~~dedicated~~times ~~studio~~per ~~next~~year ~~door~~and towas ~~our~~a ~~headquarters. The~~glossy ~~purpose~~full-color magazine of ~~the~~approximately ~~show~~120 ~~was~~pages tothat ~~create~~was ageared ~~successful~~toward ~~Wall~~an ~~Street~~affluent ~~based~~readership ~~talk~~of ~~show~~investment ~~that~~related ~~could~~professionals beand ~~streamed~~corporate ~~over~~leaders. In the ~~internet~~first ~~for~~quarter ~~worldwide~~of ~~distribution. In January~~ 2009, wethe ~~purchased~~Company ~~and~~transitioned ~~closed~~its onmedia ~~the~~business ~~building~~ to bea ~~used~~web-based asbusiness ~~the studio~~model.

~~Taking~~By ~~into~~the ~~effect~~first quarter of 2009, we had launched the ~~recession~~second ~~and~~generation ~~specifically~~of the ~~pressure~~iValueRich ~~put~~media onplatform, ~~micro~~which added a full spectrum of financial and ~~small~~web-based tools for small-cap ~~stocks~~companies ~~that~~seeking ~~were~~to ~~the~~raise ~~life~~capital ~~blood~~via toa ~~our~~web-based ~~business~~Direct ~~model,~~Public weOffering ~~chose~~(“DPO”) toformat. ~~reduce~~In ~~some~~addition ofto ~~our~~the ~~overhead~~web-based ~~associated~~network ~~with~~banking ~~our~~platform, ~~media~~we ~~business~~created ~~and~~a ~~focus~~business ontalk ~~leveraging~~show ~~our~~called ~~assets~~The toMoney ~~either~~Bunker, ~~buy~~which orwas ~~acquire~~produced at a ~~more~~dedicated ~~successful~~studio ~~company~~next indoor to our ~~industry~~headquarters. WeThe ~~continue~~purpose toof ~~own~~the ~~our~~show ~~media~~was ~~properties~~to ~~and~~create ~~the~~a ~~assets~~successful ~~associated~~Wall ~~with~~Street ~~the~~based ~~production~~talk ~~and~~show ~~distribution~~that ofcould ~~media~~be ~~content,~~streamed weover ~~are~~the ~~hopeful~~internet ~~that~~for ~~sometime~~worldwide indistribution. In ~~the~~January ~~future~~2009, we ~~can~~purchased ~~benefit~~and ~~from~~closed ~~our~~on ~~financial~~the ~~media~~building ~~components~~to ~~and~~be ~~infrastructure~~used as the studio.

InTaking ~~early~~into ~~2009,~~effect the ~~Company~~recession ~~began~~and tospecifically ~~search~~the ~~for~~pressure aput ~~company~~on ~~that~~micro ~~was~~and ~~hard~~small ~~hit~~cap bystocks ~~the~~that ~~recession~~were ~~but~~the ~~remained~~life anblood ~~opportunity~~to ~~for~~our abusiness ~~publicly traded company with cash. In October of 2009~~model, we ~~were~~chose ~~presented with an opportunity~~ to ~~acquire~~reduce ~~the~~some ~~Tesoro~~of ~~Preserve~~our ~~Development~~overhead ~~that~~associated ~~came~~with ~~available~~our ~~from~~media ~~the~~business ~~previous owner~~ and ~~lender~~focus ~~after~~on ~~they~~leveraging ~~were~~our ~~severely~~assets ~~impacted~~to byeither ~~the~~buy ~~downturn~~or inacquire ~~real~~a ~~estate~~successful ~~in south Florida~~company. We ~~The~~continue ~~purchase~~to ofown ~~the~~our ~~development~~media ~~included~~properties ~~acquiring~~and ~~assets from~~ the ~~previous~~assets ~~developer;~~associated ~~among~~with the ~~assets~~production ~~purchased were 82 single-family residential lots~~ and ~~approximately~~distribution ~~7 acres~~ of ~~commercially~~media ~~zoned land. Included in the acquisition~~content, VRwe Preserve Development, LLC, ValuRich’s wholly owned subsidiary became the master declarant or developer of the Tesoro Preserve Development and assumed control over the Property Owners Association (“POA”). These are ~~special~~hopeful ~~fees~~that ~~assessed~~sometime byin the ~~Property~~future ~~Owner’s~~we ~~Association~~can ~~against~~benefit ~~its~~from ~~members~~our ~~for~~financial ~~the~~media ~~purpose~~components ~~of developing, managing~~ and ~~selling a development of homes~~infrastructure.

OnIn ~~January~~early 202009, ~~2010,~~ the Company’s ~~wholly~~began ~~owned~~to ~~subsidiary,~~search VRfor ~~Preserve~~a ~~Development,~~company ~~LLC~~that ~~(the~~was ~~“VR~~hard ~~Preserve”),~~hit ~~acquired~~by ~~certain~~the ~~assets~~recession ~~related~~but toremained ~~the~~an ~~Tesoro~~opportunity ~~Preserve~~for ~~Development~~a ~~located~~publicly intraded ~~Port~~company Stwith cash. In ~~Lucie,~~October ~~Florida~~of 2009, ~~(“the~~we ~~Development”)~~were ~~from~~presented with an ~~unaffiliated~~opportunity ~~third~~to ~~party. The~~acquire the Tesoro Preserve Development isthat acame ~~private~~available ~~350-acre~~from ~~community~~the ~~with~~previous ~~440~~owner ~~individual~~and ~~home~~lender ~~sites~~after inthey ~~St.~~were ~~Lucie~~severely ~~County,~~impacted ~~Florida. Included~~by the downturn in the ~~asset~~real ~~purchase~~estate ~~was~~market ~~six~~in ~~(6)~~south ~~waterfront~~Florida. ~~single-family~~The ~~residential~~purchase ~~lots,~~of ~~seventy-six~~the ~~(76)~~development ~~single~~included ~~family~~acquiring ~~residential~~assets ~~lots,~~from ~~approximately~~the ~~seven~~previous ~~(7)~~developer; ~~acre~~among ~~commercially~~the ~~zoned~~assets ~~parcel,~~purchased ~~and~~were ~~certain~~82 ~~related~~single-family ~~Appurtenances,~~residential ~~Improvements,~~lots ~~Personal~~and ~~Property,~~approximately ~~Intangible~~7 ~~Property,~~acres ~~Assigned~~of ~~Agreements,~~commercially ~~Leases,~~zoned ~~Interests~~land. Included asin ~~Declarant~~the ~~under~~acquisition, ~~the~~VR ~~Master~~Preserve ~~Declaration~~Development, ~~and~~LLC, ~~Association~~ValueRich’s ~~Rights~~wholly asowned ~~defined~~subsidiary inbecame the ~~Contract~~master ~~for~~declarant ~~Sale~~or ~~and~~developer ~~Purchase,~~of ~~dated~~the ~~December~~Tesoro ~~31,~~Preserve ~~2009~~Development ~~between~~and ~~Ginn-La~~assumed ~~Wilderness~~control ~~Ltd.,~~over ~~LLL (~~the ~~“Sellor”)~~Property ~~and~~Owners’ ~~Seaboard~~Association ~~Home Building, Corp.~~ (~~the~~ “~~Assignor~~POA”),. These ~~which~~are ~~was~~special ~~assigned~~fees toassessed ~~the~~by ~~Company pursuant to an Assignment of Contract that~~ the ~~Company~~Property ~~had~~Owners’ ~~entered~~Association ~~into~~against ~~with~~its ~~the~~members ~~Assignor. As consideration~~ for the ~~acquisition,~~purpose ~~the~~of ~~Company advanced $250~~developing,~~000~~ tomanaging VRand ~~Preserve~~selling ~~who acquired~~ a ~~significant~~development ~~amount~~ of ~~the land, development rights, and builder’s royalty program~~homes.

~~For~~On ~~the~~January ~~purpose~~20, ~~of managing~~2010, ~~developing~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~selling~~wholly ~~the~~owned ~~recently~~subsidiary, ~~acquired~~VR ~~Tesoro~~ Preserve ~~assets~~Development, ~~the~~LLC ~~Company authorized~~ (the ~~creation~~“VR ofPreserve”), ~~the~~acquired ~~following~~certain ~~four~~assets ~~new~~related ~~LLC’s:~~to ~~1)VR~~the Tesoro Preserve Development, ~~LLC.,~~located ~~(2)VR~~in ~~Premier~~Port ~~Holdings, LLC~~St., ~~(3)VR Circle Holdings~~Lucie, ~~LLC.~~Florida, ~~and~~ (4“the Development”)~~Tesoro~~ ~~Preserve~~from ~~Development~~an ~~Fund,~~unaffiliated ~~LLC~~third party. The ~~first~~Tesoro ~~(3)~~Preserve ~~three~~Development ~~LLC’s~~is ~~are~~a ~~specifically~~private ~~for~~350-acre ~~the~~community ~~purpose~~with of440 ~~managing,~~individual ~~developing~~home ~~and~~sites ~~selling~~in ~~the assets~~St. ~~The~~ ~~fourth~~Lucie ~~LLC~~County, ~~Tesoro~~Florida. Included ~~Preserve~~in ~~Opportunity~~the ~~Fund,~~asset ~~LLC~~purchase iswas asix ~~newly~~(6) ~~formed~~waterfront ~~company~~single-family ~~with~~residential ~~its~~lots, ~~main~~seventy-six ~~business~~(76) ~~strategy~~single ~~being~~family ~~the~~residential ~~acquisition~~lots, ~~development,~~approximately ~~management~~seven ~~and~~(7) ~~sale~~acres of ~~real~~commercially ~~estate~~zoned ~~assets,~~parcel located ~~within~~adjacent to the ~~Tesoro~~residential ~~Preserve Development~~community, inand ~~Port~~certain ~~St.~~related ~~Lucie~~Appurtenances, ~~Florida. Tesoro~~Improvements, ~~Preserve~~Personal ~~Opportunity~~Property, ~~Fund~~Intangible ~~LLC’s~~Property, ~~goal~~Assigned isAgreements, toLeases, ~~acquire~~Interests upas toDeclarant ~~200~~under ~~single family lots within~~ the ~~Tesoro~~Master ~~Preserve Development~~Declaration, ~~that~~and ~~are~~Association ~~either~~Rights ~~bank~~as ~~owned,~~defined in the ~~process~~Contract offor ~~foreclosure,~~Sale ~~non-performing~~and ~~assets~~Purchase, ~~for~~dated ~~the~~December ~~mortgage~~31, ~~holders~~2009 orbetween ~~properties~~Ginn-La ~~facing~~Wilderness ~~liens~~Ltd., ~~from~~LLL ~~unpaid~~(the ~~POA~~“Seller”) ~~fees~~ and ~~unpaid~~Seaboard ~~back~~Home ~~property~~Building, ~~taxes~~Corp. ~~The~~(the ~~intent is to capitalize on discounted pricing~~“Assignor”), ~~current~~which ~~market~~was ~~conditions~~assigned ~~and~~to the ~~banks’~~Company ~~desire~~pursuant to ~~remove~~an ~~these~~Assignment ~~particular~~of ~~assets~~Contract ~~from~~that ~~their~~the ~~balance~~Company ~~sheets~~had ~~leveraging~~entered VRinto ~~Preserve~~with ~~as developer of~~ the ~~project~~Assignor.

OnFor ~~January~~the ~~20,~~purpose ~~2010~~of managing, ~~the~~developing ~~Company~~and (selling the ~~“Assignee)~~recently ~~entered~~acquired ~~into~~Tesoro anPreserve ~~Assignment~~assets, ofthe ~~Contract~~Company ~~with~~authorized ~~Seaboard Homebuilding (~~the ~~“Assignor”). As~~creation ~~partial~~of ~~consideration~~the offollowing ~~obtaining~~four ~~assignment~~new ~~rights~~LLC’s: to1)VR ~~the~~Preserve ~~property~~Development, ~~the~~LLC., ~~Company~~(2)VR ~~paid~~Premier ~~$139~~Holdings,~~000~~ ~~and~~LLC., ~~issued~~(3)VR ~~600~~Circle Holdings,~~000~~ ~~shares~~LLC., ofand ~~common~~(4)Tesoro ~~stock~~Preserve toDevelopment ~~the~~Fund, ~~Assignor~~LLC. AsThe afirst ~~result,~~(3) ~~the~~three ~~Assignor~~LLC’s ~~transferred~~are ~~all~~specifically ~~rights,~~for ~~title~~the ~~and~~purpose ~~interest~~of ~~held~~managing, todeveloping and selling the ~~Company~~assets. AsThe ~~such~~fourth LLC, ~~the~~Tesoro ~~Company~~Preserve ~~assumes~~Opportunity ~~and~~Fund, ~~agrees~~LLC tois ~~perform~~a ~~all~~newly ~~the~~formed ~~remaining~~company ~~and~~with ~~executor~~its ~~obligations~~main ofbusiness ~~the~~strategy ~~Assignor~~being ~~under~~ the ~~contract~~acquisition, ~~and~~development, ~~agrees~~management ~~to indemnify~~ and ~~hold~~sale ~~the~~of ~~Assignor~~real ~~harmless~~estate ~~from~~assets, ~~any~~located ~~claim~~within orthe ~~demand~~Tesoro ~~resulting~~Preserve ~~from~~Development, ~~non-performance~~in byPort ~~the~~St. ~~Company~~Lucie, Florida. AsTesoro ~~additional~~Preserve ~~consideration~~Opportunity ~~for~~Fund ~~the~~LLC’s ~~purchase,~~goal ~~the~~is ~~Company~~to ~~loaned~~acquire anup ~~additional~~to ~~amount~~200 ofsingle ~~$1.4~~family ~~million~~lots towithin ~~one~~the ofTesoro ~~its~~Preserve ~~wholly~~Development, ~~owned~~that ~~subsidiary~~are either bank owned, VRin ~~Preserve~~the ~~Development~~process of foreclosure, tonon-performing ~~pay~~assets for the ~~estimated~~mortgage ~~costs~~holders toor ~~complete~~properties ~~the~~facing ~~work~~liens ~~under~~from ~~the~~unpaid ~~Development~~POA ~~Agreement,~~fees ~~entered~~and ~~into~~unpaid back property taxes. The intent is to capitalize on ~~January~~discounted 15pricing, ~~2010~~current ~~between~~market conditions and the ~~Seller~~banks’ ofdesire ~~the~~to ~~property~~remove ~~and~~these particular assets from their balance sheets leveraging VR Preserve as developer of the project.

On January 20, 2010, the Company (the “Assignee) entered into an Assignment of Contract with Seaboard Homebuilding (the “Assignor”). As partial consideration of obtaining assignment rights to the property, the Company agreed to pay $139,000 and issue 600,000 shares of common stock to the Assignor. As a result, the Assignor transferred all rights, title and interest held in the Tesoro Preserve Development to the Company. As such, the Company assumes and agrees to perform all the remaining and executor obligations of the Assignor under the contract and agrees to indemnify and hold the Assignor harmless from any claim or demand resulting from non-performance by the Company. As additional consideration for the purchase, the Company paid an additional amount of $1.4 million for estimated costs to complete the work under the Development Agreement, entered into on January 15, 2010 between the Seller of the property and VR Preserve.

The Company trades on the NYSE Amex under the trading symbol “IVA.”

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010 and 2009

	Three months ended March 31,
	2010			2009			$ Change			% Change
REVENUE	$	15,000		$	37,485		$	(22,485	)		-60.0	%
COST OF REVENUE		-			-			-			0.0	%
GROSS PROFIT		15,000			37,485			(22,485	)		-60.0	%
OPERATING EXPENSES		188,001			263,127			(75,126	)		-28.6	%
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		23,196			(42,640	)		65,836			-154.4	%
NET LOSS	$	(149,805	)	$	(268,282	)	$	118,477			-44.2	%

Revenue and Cost of Revenue

~~During~~Net revenue for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, weincreased ~~generated~~by $15237,~~000~~630 into ~~revenue~~$268,407 ~~that~~compared to $30,777 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, revenue arose primarily from consulting services we provided by the Company. The Company did not recognize cost of revenue directly associated with the consulting revenue. The Company recognized no consulting revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2010. During the ~~same~~three ~~period~~months ended June 30, 2010, all of ~~2009~~the weCompany’s ~~had~~revenue ~~revenues~~was the result of the sale of a residential lot located in the Tesoro Preserve Development acquired in January 2010. The Company recognized cost of revenue equal to the $3736,~~485~~466 allocated to the individual property sold based on the relative fair value of the property compared to the fair value of all lots purchased.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses decreased by $7598,~~126~~252 from $~~263~~306,~~127~~122 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 to $~~188~~207,~~001~~870 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The decrease in total operating expenses was primarily due to a decrease in salaries as a result of downsizing ~~and a decrease~~ in ~~consulting services received in~~ the amount of $6086,~~000 and $18,000, respectively~~767.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expenses) ~~during~~decreased ~~the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to March 31, 2009 increased~~ by $6553,~~836~~488 from $~~(42~~96,~~640)~~846 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2009 to $2343,~~196~~358 for the ~~same~~three ~~period~~months inended June 30, 2010. ~~This~~The ~~increase~~decrease is primarily attributable to a ~~net~~decrease ~~unrealized loss~~ in ~~the amount of $139,000 and~~ net ~~realized~~gains ~~gain~~on ofinvestments ~~$65,000~~ in marketable securities ~~for~~in the ~~three~~amount ~~months~~of ~~ended~~$29,045 ~~March~~due ~~31,~~to ~~2009,~~the ~~offset~~Company byhaving asignificantly ~~decrease~~fewer indispositions ~~interest~~of ~~income~~marketable ~~for~~securities ~~$9,000. During~~during the ~~three~~2010 ~~months~~and ~~ended~~an ~~March~~increase ~~31,~~in ~~2010,~~interest ~~the~~expense ~~Company~~of ~~sold~~$16,926 ~~all~~related ~~trading securities~~ to ~~invest~~debt inissued asubsequent ~~development~~to ~~property~~June ~~and~~30, ~~fund operations~~2009.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

Revenue and Cost of Revenue

Net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010, increased by $215,145 to $283,407 compared to $68,262 for the six months ended June 30, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, revenue totaling $68,262 arose primarily from consulting services provided by the Company. The Company recognized consulting revenue totaling $15,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company did not recognize cost of revenue directly associated with consulting revenue. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, all of the Company’s revenue except for $15,000 of consulting revenue was the result of the sale of a residential property located in the Tesoro Preserve Development acquired in January 2010. The Company recognized cost of revenue equal to the $36,466 allocated to the individual property sold based on the relative fair value of the property compared to the fair value of all lots purchased.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses decreased by $173,378 from $569,249 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $395,871 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in total operating expenses was primarily due to a decrease in salaries as a result of downsizing in the amount of $121,622 and a decrease in professional fees in the amount of $77,407; offset by an increase in deprecation expense in the amount of $18,427 resulting from property and equipment acquired during 2009 being depreciated for a full six months compared to less than six months of depreciation in the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expenses) increased by $12,348 from $54,206 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to $66,554 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in net gains on investments in marketable securities in the amount of $55,250 due to the Company disposing of a large portion of its marketable securities during the first quarter of 2010 offset by an increase in interest expense of $25,807 related to debt issued subsequent to June 30, 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, we had cash of $47319,~~055~~044 and wenet ~~had a~~ working capital ~~deficit~~ of $~~275~~68,~~599~~783, compared to cash of $1,034,848 and a working capital of $1,422,689 as of December 31, 2009. The decrease in working capital iswas due to anthe ~~investment~~Company’s ~~purchase~~investments in real estate and related note receivable, which began in January 2010, offset by the sale of real estate in June 2010 for a gross profit and corresponding increase in working capital of $231,941.

~~The~~For ~~following~~the ~~table~~six ~~sets~~months ~~forth~~ended June 30, 2010 we had a ~~summary~~decrease in total cash resources of ~~our~~$715,804. The decrease in cash ~~flows~~is primarily due to the Company’s investment in real estate and related note receivable totaling $1,634,030. The Company used an additional $52,481 in operations during the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net cash used in operations of $409,149 for the ~~periods~~six ~~presented~~months ~~below:~~ended June 30, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company collected $120,000 of principal on the note receivable related to its investment in real estate, issued debt for net proceeds of $191,440, and sold marketable securities for net proceeds of $659,267.

	Three months ended March 31,
	2010			2009
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(129,885	)	$	(156,650	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(1,029,848	)		993,499
Net cash provided by financing activities		171,940			-
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents		(987,793	)		836,849
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	47,055		$	1,757,757

~~For the three months ended March 31, 2010 we had a decrease in total cash resources of $987,793. The decrease was primarily due to purchase of real estate of the Tesoro Preserve Development.~~19

We have spent, and expect to continue to spend, substantial amounts in connection with the implementation of our business strategy, including our revisions to our current lines of business and our future endeavors. Based on our current plans, we believe that our cash will be sufficient to enable us to meet our planned operating needs at least for the next 12 months.

Commitments and Contingencies

In January 2009, the Company entered into a one year lease agreement with Joseph C. Visconti, CEO and President, to lease a 1,750 square foot office facility for $3,190 per month ($38,280 per year) commencing January 1, 2009 and terminating on December 31, 2009. The Company has renewed the lease for ~~the~~one ~~2010~~year ~~for~~effective ~~one~~January ~~year~~1, 2010.

In June 2010, the Company commenced litigation against China Pharmaceuticals, a publicly traded company for breach of contract and other related claims. The Company alleges ownership of 20% of the outstanding shares of China Pharmaceuticals pursuant to a May 2009 Consulting Agreement (the `Consulting Agreement') between the Company and Xian Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, the Chinese-based operating company for China Pharmaceuticals (`collectively, China Pharmaceuticals').”

Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement, the Company agreed to provide assistance to China Pharmaceuticals in connection with their desire to become a publicly traded company in the United States. In exchange, China Pharmaceuticals agreed to compensate the Company with, among other things, the issuance and transfer of 20% of the shares of the proposed newly formed public company.

In July of 2009, upon the filing of a Form-S1 registration statement under the guidance of the Company, China Pharmaceuticals was fully positioned to become a publicly traded company, accomplishing the goals and objectives of the parties set forth in the Consulting Agreement. However, despite the Company’s good faith performance under the Consulting Agreement, the public offering contemplated by China Pharmaceuticals was never consummated. Instead, China Pharmaceuticals terminated the agreement, cancelled shares validly issued to Company in the proposed new public company, and then preceded to go public through another source while refusing to compensate the Company.

Contractual Obligations

We have ~~one~~a $25,000 convertible note payable outstanding at ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The note was issued in October 2004, accrues interest at 6% per annum, and matured in December 2007. Other material terms of the convertible debt instruments include: 1) a conversion price of $0.60 per share; 2) a debt penalty to include the issuance of additional shares upon conversion totaling 10% of the shares into which the note may convert if the Company’s shares are not listed for public trading on or before October 1, 2004 and 3) a warrant to purchase the same number of shares into which the original principal amount could be converted at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. As the note is in default, we have classified the convertible note as short-term.

1920

On February 10, 2010, the Company issued a 6% one-year promissory note in the amount of $200,000. Accrued interest is due on a monthly basis commencing on March 10, 2010. Any unpaid interest and outstanding principal balance is payable and due on the earlier of February 10, 2011 or when the Company raises a minimum of $1,500,000 of Investor capital. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company incurred $18,305 of financing costs which will be amortized over the one-year term of the note. The Company also agreed to issue to the holder 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

In June 2010, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $25,000 pursuant to a private placement offering (“Offering”) by its wholly owned subsidiary, Tesoro Preserve Opportunity Fund, LLC (“the Fund”) The proceeds of the note were used to acquire “build ready” home lots, located within the Tesoro Preserve Development that are either bank owned, in foreclosure, or impaired by liens. The note bears interest at an annual rate of 8% and matures in June 2013 unless repaid early as allowed by the terms of the note. The holder of note is entitled to 50% of a pro rate share of the profits of the Fund after repayment of all outstanding principle and interest to all investors in the Offering. Pursuant to the Offering, the Company will issue to the holder of the note, 10,000 shares of common stock.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements, transactions, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities that would be expected to have a material current or future effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company believes that the following critical accounting policies are affected by significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Concentrations

On January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” FASB ASC 820-10 defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

·	Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

·	Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

·	Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

~~Stock-Based~~Investment ~~Compensation~~in Real Estate Held for Development and Sale

WeCosts ~~account~~incurred that are directly attributable to the acquisition, development, and construction of real estate are capitalized. The carrying amount of real estate under development and held for ~~its~~sale ~~stock-based~~is ~~compensation~~reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in ~~accordance~~circumstances ~~with~~indicate ~~FASB~~that ~~ASC~~the ~~718~~carrying ~~“Compensation-Stock~~amount ~~Compensation,” We~~of ~~recognize~~the inreal estate may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the ~~statement~~carrying amount of ~~operations~~the real estate is not recoverable. The carrying amount is not recoverable if it exceeds the ~~grant-date~~undiscounted ~~fair~~sum ~~value~~of cash flows expected to result from the disposition of ~~stock~~the ~~options~~real ~~and~~estate. If ~~other~~the ~~equity-based~~carrying ~~compensation~~value ~~issued~~is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded equal to ~~employees~~the ~~and~~excess ~~non-employees,~~of ~~estimated~~the ~~using~~carrying amount of the ~~Black-Scholes~~real ~~option~~estate ~~pricing~~over ~~model~~its fair value. There Nohave ~~options~~been no events or ~~warrants~~changes ~~were~~in ~~exercised~~circumstances ~~during~~that indicate that the ~~nine~~carrying ~~months~~amount ~~ended~~of ~~September~~the ~~30,~~real ~~2009~~estate may not be recoverable.

Revenue Recognition

Recent Pronouncements

OnIn ~~December~~January 152010, ~~2009,~~ the ~~FASB~~Financial ~~issued~~Accounting ~~ASU~~Standards ~~No.~~Board ~~2010-06~~(“FASB”) ~~Fair~~issued ~~Value~~Accounting ~~Measurements~~Standards ~~and~~Update ~~Disclosures~~(“ASU”) ~~Topic~~2010-06, ~~820~~ “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,”~~. This~~ ~~ASU~~which ~~requires~~clarifies ~~some~~certain ~~new~~existing ~~disclosures~~requirements in ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and ~~clarifies~~Disclosures,” ~~some~~and ~~existing~~requires ~~disclosure~~disclosures ~~requirements~~related ~~about~~to ~~fair~~significant ~~value~~transfers ~~measurement~~between aseach ~~set~~level ~~forth~~and inadditional ~~Codification~~information ~~Subtopic~~about ~~820-10.~~Level ~~The~~3 activity. FASB’s ~~objective~~ASU is2010-06 tobegins ~~improve~~phasing ~~these~~in ~~disclosures~~the ~~and,~~first ~~thus,~~fiscal ~~increase~~period ~~the~~beginning ~~transparency~~after inDecember ~~financial~~15, ~~reporting~~2009. The Company’s adoption of this ~~ASU~~guidance ~~will~~did not have aan ~~material~~ impact on ~~the~~its ~~Company’s consolidated~~ financial statements and disclosures.

OnIn ~~February~~October 252009, ~~2010,~~ the FASB issued ~~ASU~~guidance ~~2010-09~~on ~~Subsequent~~“Multiple ~~Events~~Deliverable ~~Topic~~Revenue ~~855~~Arrangements,” ~~“Amendments~~updating toASC ~~Certain~~605 “Revenue Recognition.” ~~and~~This ~~Disclosure~~standard ~~Requirements,”~~provides ~~effective~~application ~~immediately.~~guidance ~~The~~on ~~amendments~~whether inmultiple deliverables exist, how the ~~ASU~~deliverables ~~remove~~should be separated and how the ~~requirement~~consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting. This update establishes a selling price hierarchy for andetermining ~~SEC~~the ~~filer~~selling toprice ~~disclose~~of a ~~date~~deliverable. ~~through~~The ~~which~~selling ~~subsequent~~price ~~events~~used ~~have~~for ~~been~~each ~~evaluated~~deliverable inwill ~~both~~be ~~issued~~based ~~and~~on ~~revised~~vendor-specific ~~financial~~objective ~~statements.~~evidence, ~~Revised~~if ~~financial~~available, ~~statements~~third-party ~~include~~evidence ~~financial~~if ~~statements~~vendor-specific ~~revised~~objective asevidence ais ~~result~~not ofavailable, ~~either~~or ~~correction~~estimated ofselling anprice ~~error~~if neither vendor-specific or ~~retrospective~~third-party ~~application~~evidence ofis Uavailable.S. ~~GAAP.~~ The ~~FASB~~guidance ~~believes~~is ~~these~~effective ~~amendments~~prospectively ~~remove~~for ~~potential~~revenue ~~conflicts~~arrangements ~~with~~entered ~~the~~into ~~SEC’s~~or ~~literature~~materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The ~~adoption~~Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this ~~ASU~~guidance ~~did~~and has not ~~have~~yet adetermined ~~material~~the impact, if any, of its adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

20In October 2009, the FASB issued ASC 985-605, “Software Revenue Recognition.” This guidance changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements that are “essential to the functionality,” and scopes these products out of current software revenue guidance. The new guidance will include factors to help companies determine what software elements are considered “essential to the functionality.” The amendments will now subject software-enabled products to other revenue guidance and disclosure requirements, such as guidance surrounding revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. The amendments in this guidance are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact of its adoption on its financial statements.

On March 5, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11 Derivatives and Hedging Topic 815 “Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” This ASU clarifies the guidance within the derivative literature that exempts certain credit related features from analysis as potential embedded derivatives requiring separate accounting. The ASU specifies that an embedded credit derivative feature related to the transfer of credit risk that is only in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another is not subject to bifurcation from a host contract under ASC 815-15-25, Derivatives and Hedging — Embedded Derivatives — Recognition. All other embedded credit derivative features should be analyzed to determine whether their economic characteristics and risks are “clearly and closely related” to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and whether bifurcation is required. The ASU is effective for the Company on July 1, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.22

~~Item~~In 3February 2010, the FASB issued FASB ASU 2010-09, ~~Quantitive~~“Subsequent Events, Amendments to Certain Recognition and ~~Qualitative~~Disclosure ~~Disclosures~~Requirements,” ~~About~~which ~~Market~~clarifies ~~Risk~~certain existing evaluation and disclosure requirements in ASC 855 “Subsequent Events” related to subsequent events. FASB ASU 2010-09 requires SEC filers to evaluate subsequent events through the date in which the financial statements are issued and is effective immediately.

Item 3- Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

N/A

Item 4T – Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. Based upon such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that, as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective. This conclusion by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer does not relate to reporting periods after ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. This conclusion is based upon material weaknesses of this Company’s disclosure controls and procedures that relate to the following:

1. Accounting and Finance Personnel Weaknesses – The Company’s current accounting staff is relatively small and the Company’s resources are limited given its size; and

2. Lack of Internal Audit Function – The Company lacks sufficient resources to perform the internal audit function.

In order to mitigate these material weaknesses to the fullest extent possible, all financial reports are reviewed by an outside accounting firm that is not our audit firm. All unexpected results are investigated. At any time, if it appears that any control can be implemented to continue to mitigate such weaknesses, it will be immediately implemented. ~~The Company is in the process of complying with SOX 404 during 2009 and will be implementing additional internal controls over financial reporting and additional disclosure controls and procedures.~~

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company knows of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against it~~, nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation~~. There are no proceedings in which any of the Company’s directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to the company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

This item is not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

~~None~~On January 20, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 600,000 shares of common stock to the Assignor of rights as part of the Company’s acquisition of the Tesoro Preserve Development. The shares were value based on the trading price of the shares on the date of the agreement.

On February 10, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 250,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the issuance of a note payable in the amount of $200,000.

On May 19, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consultant agreement for the financial reporting services. The shares were value based on the trading price of the shares on the date of the agreement.

On June 18, 2010, the Company agreed to issue 10,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the issuance of a note payable in the amount of $25,000.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. ~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Reserved

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Description

31.1	Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.*
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.*

------------------------------------

*	Filed herewith

2225

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	VALUERICH INC.
Date: May 18, 2010	By:	/s/ Joseph C. Visconti
Date: August 13, 2010	By:	/s/ Joseph C. Visconti
		Joseph C. Visconti, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

2326

Filing Compare · TWIN VEE POWERCATS, INC.