SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2002
		For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003

Commission File Number: 001-09911

Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware		95-2956559
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)
4100 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 200 Newport Beach, California		92660
4100 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 200 Newport Beach, California (Address of principal executive offices)		92660 (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(949) 622-8400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(949) 622-8400

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock $0.10 Par Value


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.10 Par Value		American Stock Exchange

(Title of Each Class)

The American Stock Exchange

(Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

AtIndicate ~~May 15,~~by ~~2002,~~check ~~the~~mark ~~aggregate~~if ~~market~~disclosure ~~value~~ of delinquent ~~the~~filers ~~voting~~pursuant ~~stock~~to ~~held~~Item 405 byof Regulation S-K ~~persons~~is ~~other~~not ~~than~~contained ~~the directors~~herein, ~~executive~~ ~~officers~~ and ~~principal~~will ~~shareholders~~not ~~filing~~be ~~Schedules 13D of the Registrant was $10~~contained,~~286,656~~ ~~as determined~~to by the ~~closing~~best ~~price~~of on the ~~American~~registrant’s ~~Stock~~knowledge, ~~Exchange.~~in ~~The~~definitive ~~basis~~proxy ofor ~~this~~information ~~calculation~~statements ~~does~~incorporated ~~not constitute a~~by ~~determination~~reference byin ~~the~~Part III ~~Registrant that all~~ of ~~its~~this ~~principal shareholders,~~Form 10-K ~~directors~~or ~~and executive officers are affiliates as~~any ~~defined~~amendment into ~~Rule 405 under~~ the ~~Securities Act of 1933~~ Form 10-K. þ

AtIndicate ~~May 15,~~by ~~2002,~~check ~~there~~mark ~~were~~whether ~~14,940,162~~the registrant is ~~shares~~an ofaccelerated ~~Common~~filer ~~Stock~~(as ~~outstanding~~defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ

~~Part~~At ~~III~~May 15, ~~incorporates~~2003, ~~certain~~the ~~information~~aggregate market value of the voting stock held by persons other than the directors, ~~reference~~executive toofficers and principal shareholders filing Schedules 13D of the Registrant’s ~~definitive~~was ~~proxy~~$6,702,912 ~~statement~~as todetermined by the beclosing ~~filed~~price ~~with~~on the ~~Commission~~American noStock ~~later~~Exchange. ~~than~~The ~~June 28~~basis of this calculation does not constitute a determination by the Registrant that all of its principal shareholders, ~~2002~~directors and executive officers are affiliates as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933.

At May 15, 2003, there were the following shares outstanding of the Registrant’s classes of Common Stock:


Common Stock			12,907,050
Non-Voting Common Stock			2,007,312

Part III incorporates certain information by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission no later than June 28, 2003.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
	Item 1. Business
	Item 2. Properties
	Item 3. Legal Proceedings
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to A Vote of Security Holders
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
	Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
	Item 6. Selected Financial Data
	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
	Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
	Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
	Item 11. Executive Compensation
	Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
	Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
	Item 14. Controls and Procedures
PART IV
	Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
	Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATIONS
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 3.1
EXHIBIT 21.1
EXHIBIT 23.1
EXHIBIT 99.1
EXHIBIT 23.2
EXHIBIT 99.2

PART I


Item 1.	*Business*

General

Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. (“CPH, Inc.”), together with its subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a regional homebuilder and developer with operations throughout selected metropolitan areas of California, Texas, Arizona and Colorado. The Company conducts its homebuilding business through its wholly-owned subsidiary Capital Pacific Holdings, LLC (“CPH LLC”) and through single purpose joint venture entities. Joint venture entities are used principally in circumstances in which a third party provides capital or other financing for a project. In addition to its owned projects, the Company through one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries manages certain homebuilding projects in which it formerly had an equity interest (the “Managed Projects”). With respect to these Managed Projects, the Company is reimbursed its direct costs and paid a management fee representing an allocation of overhead. CPH, Inc. also conducts certain other activities related to homebuilding, including mortgage brokerage operations, design centers and land development activities, principally through various other subsidiaries and joint ventures. CPH LLC’s principal business activities are to build and sell single-family homes. The Company’s single-family homes are targeted to entry-level, move-up and semi-custom luxury buyers. Since 1975, the Company has built and sold ~~over~~nearly 2425,000 homes in the ~~markets~~ markets it serves. During the fiscal year ended February 28, ~~2002~~2003, the Company (including unconsolidated joint ventures but excluding Managed Projects) closed 1,~~134~~467 home and lot sales, including ~~839~~ 720 homes, at an average home sales price of $~~346~~330,000. Revenues for the same period (including unconsolidated joint ventures but excluding Managed Projects) ~~totaled~~ totaled $~~314~~268.5 million. ~~The~~Including ~~Company~~Managed ~~currently conducts its operations principally under the names Capital Pacific Homes and~~Projects, ~~in Texas,~~ ~~Clark~~revenues ~~Wilson~~totaled ~~Homes, Inc~~$297. ~~(“Clark Wilson”)~~6 million. The Company currently ~~has~~conducts ~~continued to diversify~~ its ~~business~~operations ~~from~~principally ~~the~~under ~~higher-priced California Coastal markets to~~ the ~~more~~name ~~moderate price points~~Capital ~~offered~~Pacific ~~in its other markets~~Homes.

Assets owned and under management, including assets owned by unconsolidated joint ventures and Managed Projects, totaled $~~475~~513 million at February 28, ~~2002~~2003 in 50 65 residential properties. At February 28, ~~2002~~2003, CPH, Inc.’s wholly-owned subsidiary, CPH LLC, had $~~212~~238 million in assets and a net worth of $~~109.5~~107 million. CPH LLC, the Managed Projects and certain other project-specific entities indemnify CPH, Inc. and its subsidiaries against liabilities arising from the projects owned by such entities.

References to the Company are, unless the context indicates otherwise, also references to CPH LLC, the project-specific joint venture entities and its other subsidiaries. At the current time, all material financing transactions and arrangements are incurred either by CPH LLC or by the project-specific entities.

Strategy

The Company’s long-term strategy includes the following key elements:

(1) Maintaining diversity in its geographic markets. The Company believes that geographic market diversification is a key element in achieving long-term stability and growth. While the Company has no specific plans to expand outside the California, Texas, Arizona and Colorado markets, it may consider expansion to other markets in the future. (2) Diversifying its product. The Company builds homes targeted for all price segments, from entry-level buyers to the semi-custom luxury market move-up buyers, so that it is able to deliver well-priced homes to a broad segment of its potential customer base. Within Texas, Arizona and Colorado, the Company serves the entry level as well as move-up markets. Within California, the Company has products targeted toward first, second and third time move-up buyers, as well as the million dollar luxury market. This product diversification enables the Company to adapt to changing market conditions. (3) Enhancing the Company’s capital base and sources of financial liquidity. This has been a principal focus of the Company over the past several years. The Company has substantially improved its leverage ratios and reduced its debt costs. In fiscal year 1995, the Company accessed the public debt capital markets through the sale of $100 million of 12 3/4% Senior Notes (“Senior Notes”) including 790,000 warrants to purchase common stock (the “Offering”). The Senior Notes were due May 1, 2002

~~790,000 warrants to purchase common stock (the “Offering”). The Senior Notes were due May 1, 2002~~ and have been fully repurchased or redeemed. InDuring fiscal ~~year~~ 2002, ~~CPH,~~the ~~Inc.~~Company ~~completed~~repurchased athe ~~transaction~~remaining ~~with~~$55.6 ~~its~~million ~~principal~~of ~~financial~~the ~~investor~~Senior ~~which~~Notes ~~resulted~~and ~~in a substantial increase in~~ its ~~equity~~wholly-owned insubsidiary, CPH LLC, ~~and~~entered ~~the~~into ~~Company’s~~a ~~exit~~senior ~~from~~unsecured ~~its~~revolving ~~commercial~~credit ~~and~~facility ~~mixed-use~~with ~~businesses.~~a ~~This~~maximum ~~transaction,~~commitment ~~which is further detailed in Note 1~~ of ~~the~~$125 ~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein~~million, ~~was~~which ahas ~~substantial~~since ~~contributor~~been toincreased ~~CPH LLC’s ability~~ to ~~repay its 12 3/4% senior notes and obtain a new~~ $~~125~~140 million. ~~syndicated~~This ~~unsecured~~has ~~loan~~substantially ~~facility~~lowered ~~under~~the ~~which~~Company’s ~~CPH LLC experienced average~~ borrowing costs ~~of 5~~.5% ~~in fiscal year 2002.~~ Credit facilities in place at February 28, ~~2002~~2003 totaled $~~181~~208 million, of which $~~109~~120 million was outstanding. ~~During~~In ~~fiscal 2002~~addition, the Company ~~repurchased~~has ~~the~~begun ~~remaining~~utilizing ~~$55.6~~project ~~million~~level oflot ~~the~~development ~~Senior~~financing ~~Notes~~to ~~and~~enhance ~~its~~the ~~wholly-owned~~efficiency ~~subsidiary,~~of ~~CPH~~its ~~LLC,~~utilization ~~entered~~of ~~into~~its acapital ~~senior~~and its unsecured ~~revolving~~ credit facility ~~with a maximum commitment of $125 million~~. ~~This has substantially lowered the Company’s borrowing costs.~~ The Company believes this financing strategy allows orderly growth and greater flexibility to react quickly to changing market conditions. The Company also utilizes joint ventures within its operations as a source of financing and risk management. The Company is also considering additional sources of financing for the purpose of credit diversification and expansion. (4) Controlling costs and maintaining operational efficiency. The Company has job cost, warranty tracking and construction scheduling systems and other quality control processes to control costs and to reduce the effect of certain risks inherent in the homebuilding industry. The Company has made a substantial investment in its information systems. These systems and controls enable the Company to effectively monitor its operations and improve its efficiencies. (5) Minimizing inventory risk. CPH LLC tries to carefully manage its land and inventory risk in a variety of ways. CPH LLC monitors its supply of owned, optioned and controlled land to maintain an adequate pipeline of building lots in each of its markets while avoiding excess land holdings. For its homebuilding projects, CPH LLC generally prefers to purchase entitled land, generally defined as land that has received ~~all~~the ~~necessary~~majority of the land use approvals necessary for residential development from the appropriate state, county and local governments, typically in parcels of 50 to 250 lots, and makes use of options, seller financing, lot development financing and joint ventures, when available, to reduce its capital commitment on individual projects in order to be in a position to allocate its capital among a larger number of projects and properties. CPH LLC generally tries to limit its speculative building by commencing construction only after some sales have been made and tries to limit the size of each construction phase. CPH LLC generally purchases and holds land in amounts sufficient to support home production and sales over a 24 to 48 month period. (6) Land Development. In certain markets, often in project-specific joint ventures, the Company may purchase unentitled land, with the intention of obtaining the required entitlements and then either selling the unimproved land, developing lots and selling them to other builders or building and selling homes itself. Depending upon the available inventory of entitled land in the Company’s markets, the Company’s land development activities may vary.

Homebuilding Geographic Markets

At February 28, ~~2002~~2003, the Company, either directly or through joint ventures, including ~~five~~four Managed Projects in which the Company does not have an equity ownership interest, controlled lots in various stages of development with respect to approximately 5065 residential projects, including 19 projects located in the Orange, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara and Riverside Counties of California, eight projects located in Austin, Texas, eight projects located in Phoenix, Arizona and 15 projects in the Denver metropolitan and Colorado Springs areas of Colorado. The Company is ~~currently~~ currently selling homes in 2329 of these projects. As detailed in Item 7 below, the Company anticipates opening between ~~18-24~~8 and 10 net new projects in the current fiscal year. The Company’s homes for sale (including Managed Projects) currently range in size from ~~950 to 5,000 square feet in California, from~~ 1,~~700~~200 to 48,~~500 square feet in Texas, from 1,~~000 ~~to 3,200~~ square feet ~~in Arizona~~ and ~~from 1,100 to 3,800 square feet in Colorado. The Company’s homes~~ are ~~currently~~ currently priced from $~~235~~109,000 to ~~$2,100,000~~slightly inover ~~California, from~~ $~~146~~4,000 ~~to $900~~,000 ~~in Texas, from $90,000 to $234,000 in Arizona, and from $128,000 to $400,000 in Colorado~~. ~~In the Company’s~~ ~~Managed Projects in California, the Company’s homes are~~ ~~currently priced from $900,000 to $5,600,000 and range in size~~ ~~from 3,400 to 7,800 square feet.~~

The following table sets forth the estimated number of homes under construction and lots owned, under option and controlled as of February 28, ~~2002~~2003:

Estimated Number of Housing Units that Could be

Constructed on Land Controlled as of February 28, ~~2002~~2003(a)

Lots

Homes Under

Lots

Under

Lots

Region

Construction(b)

Owned

Option(c)

Controlled(d)

Total

California

~~107~~171

~~507~~441

9957

~~628~~802

1,~~341~~471

Managed Projects (California)(e)

1238

~~187~~144

—

~~199~~182

Texas

7784

~~344~~543

30810

1,~~632~~085

2,~~083~~522

Arizona

3678

~~577~~921

84—

~~1,460~~905

21,~~157~~904

Colorado(f)

61128

~~798~~882

7739

21,~~299~~647

32,~~235~~696

Total

~~293~~499

2,~~413~~931

~~290~~906

64,~~019~~439

98,~~015~~775

(a) Based upon current management estimates, which are subject to change. ~~Includes~~This table includes the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures. This table also includes the Managed Projects in which the Company’s sole economic interest is through management agreements. (b) Includes completed model homes. (c) Lots under option represent lots under option contracts within existing projects. There can be no assurance that the Company will actually acquire any lots under option. (d) Controlled home sites include those properties for which the Company has entered into a variety of contractual relationships including non-binding letters of intent, binding purchase agreements with customary conditions precedent and similar arrangements. There can be no assurance that the Company will actually acquire any such properties. (e) This ~~table~~line includes ~~housing~~homes ~~units~~and lots in the Managed Projects in which the Company’s sole economic interest is through management agreements. These homes and lots are not owned by the Company.

(f) This table excludes the CPH Banning-Lewis Ranch, LLC property owned by a joint venture which CPH, Inc. manages and in which it has a ~~substantial~~potential profit participation (after payment of costs, return of capital, and payment of preferred return). This joint venture controls approximately 21,400 acres in Colorado Springs, Colorado as further described in footnote (ba) to Joint Ventures below.

The table below summarizes the residential developments in process in the Company’s geographic markets:

Projects and Units in Process as of February 28, ~~2002~~2003(a)

Units

Number of

Total

Units

Remaining

Projects Held for

Projects in

Units

Closed in

Region

Development(b)

Sales Stage(c)

Planned(d)

Prior Years

FY ~~2002~~2003

2/28/0203(d)

California

1418

1,~~200~~527

~~332~~487

~~155~~371

~~713~~669

Managed Projects (California)

~~278~~217

5314

2621

~~199~~182

Texas

812

2,~~128~~964

1,~~369~~061

~~308~~466

~~451~~1,437

Arizona

812

1,~~664~~518

~~589~~187

~~378~~332

~~697~~999

Colorado(e)

1519

1,~~364~~557

~~250~~210

~~178~~298

~~936~~1,049

Total

5065

2329

67,~~634~~783

21,~~593~~959

1,~~045~~488

24,~~996~~336

(a) This table includes the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures. This table also includes the Managed Projects in which the Company’s sole economic interest is through management agreements. ~~It does not include Nevada due to the fact that the Company no longer operates in that market.~~ (b) The number of projects held for development includes projects with houses in the planning, development, construction and sales stages. (c) The number of projects in the sales stage includes projects where the sales office has opened, reservations are being taken or sales contracts are being executed. (d) Includes units under construction, in backlog and lots under option in projects owned by the Company or the Managed Projects. (e) Excludes the CPH Banning-Lewis Ranch, LLC property described in footnote (ba) to Joint Ventures below.

Joint Ventures

The Company conducts its operations as either wholly-owned projects or through joint ventures in which the joint venture partner typically provides more than a majority of the capital and/or financing required for the project. The Company has utilized joint ventures in order to increase access to sources of capital, financing and land. The Company expects to continue to utilize joint ventures in the future on a selective basis, taking into account other available sources of financing, project risk and the potential return to the Company. The use of joint ventures may vary in the future in order to enable the Company to control an adequate supply of lots while minimizing capital commitments. The Company typically is required to fund a small percentage of the capital requirements of each joint venture, which amount is included in investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

At February 28, ~~2002~~2003, the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries, unconsolidated joint ventures and Managed Projects, were as follows:

						Units
	Total Units			Units Closed		Remaining
	Planned			in FY ~~2002~~2003		at 2/28/0203
Consolidated Subsidiaries(a)
Consolidated Subsidiaries
CPH Newport Coast, LLC — Orange County, CA		97			3722		242
CPH Yucaipa I, LLC — Riverside County, CA		100			2669		701
		197			63		94
CPH Dysart Ranch, LLC — Maricopa County, AZ		293			—		293
		490			91		296
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
LB/ L-CPH Longmont, LLC — Boulder County, CO		448			—		448
LB/L-CPH Longmont, LLC — Boulder County, CO		448			14		434
LB/ L-CPH Providence, LLC — Riverside County, CA		98			53		45
LB/L-CPH Providence, LLC — Riverside County, CA		98			45		—
LB/ L-CPH Laguna Street, LLC — Santa Barbara County, CA		14			—		14
LB/L-CPH Laguna Street, LLC — Santa Barbara County, CA		14			—		14
CPH Daily Ranch, L.P. — Ventura County, CA		~~294~~262			18		~~294~~244
CPH Banning-Lewis Ranch, LLC — El Paso County, CO(b)		(b	)		—		(b	)
CPH Sierra Peak, L.P. — Riverside County, CA		90			—		90
		854			53		801
CPH Banning-Lewis Ranch, LLC — El Paso County, CO(a)		(a	)		—		(a	)
Managed Projects(c)
		912			77		782
Makallon RPV Associates, LLC — Los Angeles County, CA		79			5		65
Managed Projects(b)
Makallon Dana Point, LLC — Orange County, CA		44			—		44
Makallon RPV Associates, LLC — Los Angeles County, CA		79			16		49
Makallon Monarch Beach, LLC — Orange County, CA		65			21		—
Makallon Dana Point, LLC — Orange County, CA		44			5		39
Makallon Resorts I, LLC — Orange County, CA(d)		90			—		90
Makallon Resorts I, LLC — Orange County, CA(c)		94			—		94
		278			26		199
		217			21		182
		1,329			142		1,094
		1,619			189		1,260

(a) ~~Previously consolidated joint ventures, now wholly-owned. (b)~~ The phasing for this project is currently being determined. The joint venture owns approximately 21,400 acres of entitled land in Colorado Springs, Colorado, ~~including~~which ais ~~long-term~~currently ~~buildout~~zoned for a potential density of approximately 76,000 residential units and 7948 million square feet of commercial, industrial and office space. Based upon a variety of factors, including without limitation economic conditions and the availability of city services and utilities and government actions, the achievable density may vary. (cb) Previously unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company’s sole economic interest in the Managed Projects is through management agreements. (dc) Includes two residential projects.

Land Acquisition

For typical residential developments, CPH, LLC tries to purchase and hold land in amounts sufficient to support home production and sales over a 24 to 48 month period. ~~CPH,~~ CPH LLC also tries to maintain additional supplies of land ~~through~~ through options and other means. CPH, LLC typically does not acquire and hold land for speculative investment, but on several ~~occasions~~ occasions has sold some or all of the lots in a project ~~simultaneously~~ simultaneously with the acquisition of such lots by CPH, LLC.

CPH, LLC typically considers numerous factors ~~when~~ when analyzing the suitability of land for acquisition and development including, but not limited to, proximity to existing developed areas; population growth patterns; availability of existing community services (i.e., utilities, schools and transportation); employment growth rates; anticipated absorption rates for new housing; and the estimated cost of development.

6 ~~CPH, LLC tries to avoid speculative building by~~ ~~constraining project phase sizes, and entitlement risks by~~ ~~acquiring entitled land when practicable and acquiring lots~~ through the use of options, development agreements and joint ventures with lot owners, when available on favorable terms. Additionally, by forming joint ventures with various sources of capital, the Company has been able to obtain access to additional capital and construction financing to expand the number of lots the Company controls and to spread project risk.

6 Table of Contents

~~Table~~ CPH LLC tries to avoid speculative building by constraining project phase sizes, and entitlement risks by acquiring entitled land when practicable and acquiring lots through the use of ~~Contents~~options, development agreements and joint ventures with lot owners, when available on favorable terms. Additionally, by forming joint ventures with various sources of capital, the Company has been able to obtain access to additional capital and construction financing to expand the number of lots the Company controls and to spread project risk.

Due to increased competition and in some markets a declining supply of favorably priced lots, the Company continues to consider opportunities to purchase unentitled land, re-entitle land, and acquire larger positions in land tracts than can practically be utilized by the Company’s homebuilding operations. Where possible and appropriate, the Company will seek outside capital and pursue such activities through joint ventures. In general, and particularly within CPH, LLC, all such activities are closely related to CPH, LLC’s homebuilding activities.

Product Design

The Company has received numerous industry design awards for its homes and developments. The Company has been featured in several nationally known periodicals, on network television and in various international publications. The Company’s homes are noted for their innovative design, attention to detail and quality construction. By emphasizing the right product designs, the Company has also been able to build brand loyalty while attempting to reduce warranty costs. In many markets, resales of the Company’s homes include the Company’s name as a sign of quality construction and design.

The Company contracts with a number of outside architects, designers, engineers, consultants and subcontractors. ~~While~~The ~~some of the~~ Company’s ~~employees are involved in various stages of the design process, the Company~~ believes that the use of third parties for the production of the final design, engineering and construction reduces its costs, increases design innovation and quality, and reduces ~~the~~ risks ~~of liability associated with the design and construction process~~. The Company has a large number of plans which it has used in various projects and can be re-used in new projects with appropriate modifications as necessary. ~~In certain projects the~~The Company offers options and upgrades to provide its homebuilders with opportunities to ~~customize~~augment their home to fit their lifestyle, the extent of which varies depending upon the project. However, structural and other changes which impact the build time of the home are typically limited.

The Company creates architectural variety within its projects by offering numerous models, floor plans, and exterior styles in an effort to enhance home values by creating diversified neighborhood looks within its projects. Generally, the Company selects the exterior finishes of its homes subject to necessary architectural approvals. The Company offers homebuyers the opportunity to engage interior design consultants to personalize the interior of their homes. Such services are offered at an additional cost to buyers ~~either~~ through ~~the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Newport Design Center (“Newport Design”), its design center in Texas or other~~ third parties contracted with by the Company, or the services may be provided through the homebuyer’s own consultants.

Development and Construction

The Company typically acts as the general contractor for the construction of its projects and the Managed Projects. ~~Virtually~~Typically, all construction work for the Company is performed by subcontractors. The Company’s consultants and employees coordinate the construction of each project and the activities of subcontractors and suppliers, and subject their work to quality and cost controls and compliance with zoning and building codes. Subcontractors typically are retained on a phase-by-phase basis to complete construction at a fixed price. Agreements with the Company’s subcontractors are generally entered into after competitive bidding on a project-by-project basis. The Company has established relationships with a large number of subcontractors and is not dependent to any material degree upon the services of any one subcontractor. ~~and believes~~Decreasing ~~that,~~availability ifof ~~necessary,~~insurance itcoverage ~~can~~for ~~generally retain sufficient qualified~~ subcontractors ~~for~~as ~~each aspect of construction. The Company~~well ~~believes~~as, ~~that~~in ~~conducting~~California, ~~its~~the ~~operations~~effects inof ~~this~~increased ~~manner enables~~Worker’s itCompensation ~~not~~insurance ~~only~~rates tomay ~~readily~~have ~~and~~an ~~efficiently~~adverse ~~adapt~~effect ~~to changes~~ in ~~housing~~ ~~demand, but also to avoid fixed costs associated with~~the ~~retaining~~availability ~~construction~~of ~~personnel~~qualified subcontractors.

The Company typically develops its residential projects in several phases generally averaging approximately 10 to 15 homes per phase. The Company determines the number of homes to be built in the first phase and the appropriate price range. The first phase of home construction is typically relatively small to reduce risk while the Company measures consumer demand. Construction generally does not begin until some sales have ~~occurred, except for construction of model homes~~ ~~and in some cases the first few additional homes. Subsequent~~ ~~phases are generally not started until 50% to 75% of the homes~~ ~~in the previous phase have been~~

occurred, except for construction of model homes and in some cases the first few additional homes. Subsequent phases are generally not started until 50% to 75% of the homes in the previous phase have been sold. Sales prices in the second phase are then adjusted to reflect market demand as evidenced by ~~sales~~ sales experience in the first phase. With each subsequent phase, ~~the~~ the Company continues to accumulate data which enables the ~~Company~~ Company to make decisions on the pricing, timing and size of ~~subsequent~~ subsequent phases. Although the time required to complete a phase varies from development to development depending on the above factors and the build time which in turn varies generally with the size and complexity of the home, the Company typically ~~completes~~ completes construction of a phase within one of its California developments in approximately six to ten months for larger homes and four to five months for smaller homes and within its Texas, Arizona and Colorado developments within three to five months. The Company is continuously developing and refining its production practices in order to reduce cycle time within the construction process.

Sales and Marketing

The Company typically builds, furnishes and landscapes model homes for each residential project and maintains on-site sales offices, which are usually open seven days a week once a project fully opens. The Company generally sells all of its homes through Company sales representatives who typically work from the sales offices located either at the model homes or at sales centers used in each subdivision. When appropriate, the Company also uses ~~cooperative~~listing and cooperative brokers to sell its homes.

The Company generally opens an on-site sales office before the construction of the model homes is completed. This on-site sales office is utilized to commence the sales process to potential customers. The sales center is later generally moved to one of the model homes. Potential homebuyers may reserve a home by submitting a refundable deposit (a reservation deposit) usually ranging from $500 to $20,000 and executing a reservation document. The Company then conducts preliminary research concerning the credit status of the potential homebuyer in order to “pre-qualify” the homebuyer. Once the prospective homebuyer has been “pre-qualified” and there is a strong indication that the homebuyer will qualify for a mortgage (although final loan approval is still pending), the homebuyer must then convert the reservation deposit to an “earnest money deposit” and complete a purchase contract for the purchase of their home. The Company attempts to keep its contract cancellation rate low by attempting to pre-qualify prospective homebuyers and by allowing homebuyers to customize their homes at an early point in the purchase process. When home purchase contracts are canceled, ~~damages~~ ~~are usually limited to a percentage of~~ the ~~purchase~~ ~~price of the home and may be less pursuant to applicable law or to the terms of the purchase contract. The~~ Company ~~generally determines whether to seek to obtain such damages on a case-by-case basis. When home purchase contracts are canceled, the Company~~ seeks to identify alternate homebuyers.

The Company makes extensive use of advertising and promotional resources, including newspaper and magazine advertisements, brochures, direct mail and the placement of strategically located signboards and occasionally places radio and television advertisements. Because the Company usually offers multiple projects within a market area, it is able to utilize regional advertising that highlights all of the Company’s projects within that same market area. ~~The~~ ~~Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Creative~~ ~~Design & Media, designs most advertising materials and~~ ~~brochures for the Company’s California operations.~~

The Company ~~has~~utilizes ~~established~~the aInternet ~~highly sophisticated~~through its website ~~on the Internet~~address, www.~~cph-inc~~capitalpacifichomes.com., ~~The Company~~and ~~utilizes the Internet~~ through ~~its website address and~~ ~~through~~ participation in a builder-sponsored web joint venture to to augment its advertising and promotional activities.

The Company provides flooring and other amenities and upgrades to its homebuyers through ~~Newport Design and~~ various ~~owned and~~ contracted facilities.

8 ~~Capital Pacific University~~

Table The Company has established a training vehicle for its employees called Capital Pacific University (“CPU”). The mission of CPU is to create a teaching and learning environment that stimulates personal growth and professional improvement. Contents

8 Operating Data

~~Table~~ The following table shows new home and lot deliveries, net new orders and average sales prices for each of the ~~Contents~~last three fiscal years for each of the Company’s residential operations, including unconsolidated joint ventures but excluding Managed Projects:

Operating Data



				Year Ended

				February 28,		February 28,		February 28,
				2001		2002		2003

New homes delivered:
	California				68		101		196
	Texas				426		305		178
	Nevada				231		69		—
	Arizona				240		172		171
	Colorado				198		139		112

		Subtotal			1,163		786		657
	Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (California)				46		53		63

			Total homes delivered		1,209		839		720
Lots delivered					990		295		747

			Total homes and lots delivered		2,199		1,134		1,467

Net new orders					1,155		782		869

Average sales price for homes delivered:
	California (excluding unconsolidated joint ventures)			$	1,518,000	$	1,193,000	$	587,000
	California (including unconsolidated joint ventures)				1,458,000		880,000		559,000
	Texas				203,000		260,000		247,000
	Nevada				211,000		238,000		—
	Arizona				159,000		152,000		149,000
	Colorado				212,000		237,000		237,000
	Combined (excluding unconsolidated joint ventures)				274,000		350,000		331,000
	Combined (including unconsolidated joint ventures)				315,000		346,000		330,000

~~The~~Backlog ~~following table shows new home~~ and ~~lot~~Inventory ~~deliveries, net new orders and average sales prices for each of~~ ~~the last three fiscal years for each of the Company’s residential operations, including unconsolidated joint ventures but excluding Managed Projects:~~

				Year Ended
				February 29,		February 28,		February 28,
				2000		2001		2002
New homes delivered:
	California				58		68		101
	Texas				471		426		305
	Nevada				339		231		69
	Arizona				358		240		172
	Colorado				42		198		139
		Subtotal			1,268		1,163		786
	Unconsolidated Joint Ventures (California)				28		46		53
			Total homes delivered		1,296		1,209		839
Lots delivered					710		990		295
			Total homes and lots delivered		2,006		2,199		1,134
Net new orders					1,397		1,155		782
Average sales price for homes delivered:
	California (excluding unconsolidated joint ventures)			$	898,000	$	1,518,000	$	1,193,000
	California (including unconsolidated joint ventures)				935,000		1,458,000		880,000
	Texas				189,000		203,000		260,000
	Nevada				206,000		211,000		238,000
	Arizona				144,000		159,000		152,000
	Colorado				193,000		212,000		237,000
	Combined (excluding unconsolidated joint ventures)				216,000		274,000		350,000
	Combined (including unconsolidated joint ventures)				233,000		315,000		346,000

The Company typically pre-sells homes prior to and during construction through home purchase contracts requiring earnest money deposits or through reservation documents requiring reservation deposits. Generally, reservation deposits are refundable, but home purchase contracts are not cancelable unless the customer is unable to sell their existing home, qualify for financing or under certain other circumstances. A home sale is placed in backlog status upon execution of such a contract and receipt of an earnest money deposit and is removed when such contracts are canceled as described above or the home purchase escrow is closed.

9 ~~Backlog and Inventory~~

TheTable Company typically pre-sells homes prior to and during construction through home purchase contracts requiring earnest money deposits or through reservation documents requiring reservation deposits. Generally, reservation deposits are refundable, but home purchase contracts are not cancelable unless the customer is unable to sell their existing home, qualify for financing or under certain other circumstances. A home sale is placed in backlog status upon execution of such a contract and receipt of an earnest money deposit and is removed when such contracts are canceled as described above or the home purchase escrow is closed. Contents

9 The following table shows backlog in units and dollars at the end of each of the last three fiscal years for each of the Company’s residential operations, including unconsolidated joint ventures. Backlog and selling communities data does not include Managed Projects.



		Ending Backlog


		February 28, 2001					February 28, 2002					February 28, 2003

		Units			($000s)		Units			($000s)		Units			($000s)

California			71		$	69,900		63		$	47,200		118		$	42,500
Texas			265			68,800		64			18,500		61			13,100
Nevada			45			11,400		—			—		—			—
Arizona			56			8,500		33			4,400		62			11,600
Colorado			75			15,000		34			4,200		55			12,400

	Total		512		$	173,600		194		$	74,300		296		$	79,600

Selling Communities				26					22					27

The following table shows ~~backlog~~net innew ~~units~~orders ~~and~~(sales ~~dollars~~made atless ~~the~~cancellations ~~end~~and ofcredit ~~each~~rejections), ofhomes ~~the~~closed ~~last~~and ending ~~three~~backlog ~~fiscal~~relating ~~years~~to ~~for each~~sales of the Company’s ~~residential~~homes ~~operations~~and homes under contract for each quarter since the beginning of fiscal year 2002, including unconsolidated joint ventures, and excluding Managed Projects. ~~Backlog~~The ~~data~~Company’s ~~does~~backlog ~~not~~at ~~include~~any ~~Managed~~given ~~Projects~~time atis ~~February 28,~~typically ~~2001~~a orgood ~~2002.~~indicator of the number of units that will be closed in the four to six months following such date:

			~~Ending Backlog~~										Ending Backlog
			February 29, 2000						February 28, 2001						February 28, 2002
				Net New			Homes			Lots
			Units			($000s)			Units			($000s)			Units			($000s)
				Orders			Closed			Closed			Units			($000s)
California				52		$	62,000			71		$	69,900			63		$	47,200
Fiscal Year 2002
Texas				272			54,700			265			68,800			64			18,500
	1st Quarter				209			253			11			439		$	146,500
Nevada				97			20,200			45			11,400			—			—
	2nd Quarter				119			195			65			350			116,700
Arizona				71			11,100			56			8,500			33			4,400
	3rd Quarter				181			181			59			291			91,200
Colorado				106			18,400			75			15,000			34			4,200
	4th Quarter				273			210			160			194			74,300
	Total			598		$	166,400			512		$	173,600			194		$	74,300
		Total Fiscal Year 2002			782			839			295
Selling Communities				41						26						22
Fiscal Year 2003
	1st Quarter				222			140			62			276		$	93,800
	2nd Quarter				220			130			26			351			109,700
	3rd Quarter				220			174			261			386			94,900
	4th Quarter				207			276			398			296			79,600
		Total Fiscal Year 2003			869			720			747

~~The~~Mortgage ~~following table shows net new orders (sales made less cancellations and credit rejections), homes closed and ending backlog relating to sales of the~~ Company~~’s homes and~~ ~~homes under contract for each quarter since the beginning of~~ fiscal year 2001, including unconsolidated joint ventures, and excluding Managed Projects as of February 28, 2001. The Company’s backlog at any given time is typically a good indicator of the number of units that will be closed in the four to six months following such date:

							Ending Backlog
			Net New		Homes
			Orders		Closed		Units		($000s)
Fiscal Year 2001
	1st Quarter			375		326		647	$	235,300
	2nd Quarter			302		319		630		247,800
	3rd Quarter			290		260		660		249,400
	4th Quarter			188		304		512		173,600
		Total Fiscal Year 2001		1,155		1,209
Fiscal Year 2002
	1st Quarter			209		253		439	$	146,500
	2nd Quarter			119		195		350		116,700
	3rd Quarter			181		181		291		91,200
	4th Quarter			273		210		194		74,300
		Total Fiscal Year 2002		782		839

The Company offers mortgage broker services to certain of its California homebuyers through its unconsolidated joint venture Capital Pacific Home Loans, L.P. The Company also offers mortgage broker services to certain of its Texas homebuyers through its unconsolidated joint venture, Fairway Financial L.P. In addition, the Company has established certain relationships, including joint venture investments, with local mortgage broker operations in other operating regions.

~~Mortgage~~Homeowner ~~Company~~Warranty

The Company ~~offers~~provides ~~mortgage~~homeowners ~~broker~~with ~~services~~a tolimited ~~certain~~warranty on the terms of ~~its~~which ~~California~~the ~~homebuyers~~Company ~~through~~will ~~its~~warrant, ~~wholly-owned~~for a ~~subsidiary~~limited ~~Capital~~period, ~~Pacific~~items ~~Mortgage,~~listed ~~Inc.~~in ~~The~~the ~~Company~~homeowner ~~also~~warranty manual. ~~offers~~The ~~mortgage~~warranty ~~broker~~does ~~services~~not, tohowever, ~~certain~~include ofitems ~~its~~that ~~Texas~~are covered ~~homebuyers~~by ~~through~~manufacturer’s ~~its~~warranties ~~unconsolidated~~(such ~~joint~~as ~~venture,~~appliances ~~Fairway~~and air ~~Financial L.P.~~conditioning) Inor ~~addition,~~items that are not installed by employees or contractors of the Company ~~has~~(such ~~established~~as flooring installed by an ~~certain~~outside ~~relationships,~~contractor ~~including~~employed ~~joint~~by ~~venture~~the ~~investments,~~homeowner). The Company also provides certain homebuyers with policies issued by ~~local~~third-parties ~~mortgage~~that ~~broker~~extend ~~operations~~protection inbeyond ~~other~~the ~~operating~~Company’s warranty ~~regions~~period. Statutory

10 ~~Homeowner Warranty~~

TheTable Company provides homeowners with a limited warranty on the terms of which the Company will warrant, for a limited period, items listed in the homeowner warranty manual. The warranty does not, however, include items that are covered by manufacturer’s warranties (such as appliances and air conditioning) or items that are not installed by employees or contractors of the Company (such as flooring installed by Contents

10 requirements in the states in which the Company does business may grant to homebuyers rights in addition to those provided by the Company.

~~Table of Contents~~ Competition

anThe ~~outside~~homebuilding ~~contractor~~industry ~~employed~~is byhighly competitive. In each of the ~~homeowner).~~markets in which it operates, the Company competes in terms of location, design, quality and price with numerous other residential builders, including large national and regional firms, many of which have greater financial resources than the Company. The Company ~~also~~has ~~provides~~seen ~~certain~~the ~~homebuyers~~financial resources of its competitors increase with ~~policies~~the consolidation ~~issued~~which bythe ~~third-parties~~industry ~~that~~has ~~extend~~experienced ~~protection~~in ~~beyond~~the past few years. As the Company’s ~~warranty~~enters ~~period.~~and ~~Statutory~~until ~~requirements~~it develops a reputation in a new market area, the Company can expect to face even more ~~states~~significant incompetitive ~~which~~pressures. Competitive pressures may cause the Company ~~does~~to ~~business~~reduce effective sales prices or to write off due diligence costs for abandoned projects. In certain markets, the Company may ~~grant~~from time to time engage in redesigns ~~homebuyers~~of ~~rights~~product and/or make changes in ~~addition~~existing model homes to ~~those~~make the ~~provided~~Company’s byproduct more competitive. Such redesigns and/or changes may cause the Company to incur additional expenses and/or to write-off previous investments in such design or model homes.

~~Competition~~Regulation

The ~~homebuilding~~housing ~~industry~~and island ~~highly~~development ~~competitive. In~~industries ~~each of the markets in which it operates, the Company~~are ~~competes~~subject into ~~terms~~increasing ~~of location~~environmental, ~~design~~building, ~~quality~~zoning and ~~price with~~real ~~numerous~~estate ~~other~~sales ~~residential~~regulations ~~builders,~~by ~~including~~various ~~large national and regional firms~~federal, ~~many~~state ofand ~~which have greater financial~~local ~~resources than the Company~~authorities. ~~The~~Such ~~Company~~regulations ~~has~~affect ~~seen~~home ~~the~~building ~~financial~~by ~~resources~~specifying, ofamong ~~its~~other ~~competitors~~things, ~~increase with~~ the ~~consolidation which~~type ~~the~~and ~~industry~~quality ~~has~~of ~~experienced in the past few years. As the~~building ~~Company~~materials ~~enters~~that ~~and~~must ~~until~~be itused, ~~develops~~certain aaspects ~~reputation~~of inland ause ~~new~~and ~~market~~building ~~area~~design, ~~the~~as ~~Company~~well ~~can~~as ~~expect to face even more significant competitive pressures. In certain markets,~~ the ~~Company~~ ~~may~~manner ~~from time to time engage~~ in ~~redesigns~~which ofthe ~~product~~Company ~~and/or~~conducts ~~make~~sales ~~changes~~activities inand ~~existing~~otherwise ~~model~~deals ~~homes~~with ~~to make the~~customers. ~~Company’s~~Such ~~product~~regulations ~~more~~affect ~~competitive.~~development ~~Such~~activities ~~redesigns~~by ~~and/or~~directly ~~changes~~affecting ~~may cause~~ the ~~Company~~viability ~~to incur additional expenses~~ and~~/or~~ totiming ~~write-off~~of ~~previous investments in such design or model homes~~projects.

~~Regulation~~The Company must increasingly obtain the approval of numerous government authorities which regulate such matters as land use and level of density, the installation of utility services, such as water and waste disposal, and the dedication of acreage for open space, parks, schools and other community purposes. If such authorities determine that existing utility services will not adequately support proposed development (including possibly in ongoing projects), building moratoria may be imposed. As a result, the Company devotes an increasing amount of time to evaluating the impact of governmental restrictions imposed upon a new residential development. Furthermore, as local circumstances or applicable laws change, the Company may be required to obtain additional approvals or modifications of approvals previously obtained or even stop all work. Such increasing regulation has resulted in a significant increase in time (and related carrying costs) between the Company’s initial acquisition of land and the commencement and completion of its developments, particularly in California and to an increasing extent, all of the Company’s markets. In addition, the extent to which the Company participates in land development activities subjects it to greater exposure to regulatory risks.

~~The housing and land development industries are~~Employees ~~subject to increasing environmental, building, zoning and real~~ estate sales regulations by various federal, state and local authorities. Such regulations affect home building by specifying, among other things, the type and quality of building materials that must be used, certain aspects of land use and building design, as well as the manner in which the Company conducts sales activities and otherwise deals with customers. Such regulations affect development activities by directly affecting the viability and timing of projects.

~~The~~As ~~Company must increasingly obtain the approval~~ of ~~numerous~~April 30, ~~government authorities which regulate such matters as land use and level of density~~2003, the ~~installation~~Company ~~of utility~~employed ~~services,~~226 ~~such~~persons ~~as water and waste disposal~~full-time, ~~and~~compared ~~the~~to ~~dedication of~~246 ~~acreage~~persons ~~for~~at ~~open space~~April 30, ~~parks, schools and other community~~ ~~purposes~~2002. IfOf ~~such authorities determine that existing utility services will not adequately support proposed development~~these, ~~building~~ ~~moratoria~~26 ~~may~~were bein ~~imposed.~~executive ~~As a result~~positions, ~~the~~56 ~~Company devotes~~were ~~an increasing amount of time to evaluating the impact of~~engaged ~~governmental~~in ~~restrictions~~sales ~~imposed upon a new residential development. Furthermore~~activities, as83 ~~local~~in ~~circumstances~~project ormanagement ~~applicable laws~~activities ~~change,~~and ~~the Company may be required to obtain additional~~61 ~~approvals or modifications of approvals previously obtained. Such increasing regulation has resulted~~ in aadministrative ~~significant increase in time (~~and ~~related~~clerical ~~carrying~~activities. ~~costs)~~None ~~between~~of the Company’s ~~initial~~employees ~~acquisition~~is ofrepresented ~~land~~by ~~and~~a ~~the~~union ~~commencement~~ and ~~completion of its developments, particularly in California and to an increasing extent, all of~~ the ~~Company’s markets.~~ ~~In addition, the extent to which the~~ Company ~~participates~~considers ~~in land~~its ~~development~~employee ~~activities~~relationships ~~subjects it~~ to ~~greater~~be ~~exposure to regulatory risks~~good.

~~Employees~~Raw Materials

AsTypically all the raw materials and most of ~~April 30,~~the components ~~2002,~~used in the Company’s ~~employed~~business are readily ~~246~~available ~~persons~~in ~~full-time,~~the ~~compared~~United toStates. ~~297 persons~~Most atare standard items carried ~~April 30,~~by ~~2001~~major suppliers. ~~Of these~~However, 27a ~~were~~rapid increase in ~~executive~~the ~~positions,~~number of 42homes ~~were~~started ~~engaged~~could cause shortages in ~~sales~~the ~~activities,~~availability 87of such materials or in ~~project~~the ~~management activities~~price ~~and~~of 90services, thereby leading to delays in ~~administrative~~the ~~and~~delivery ~~clerical~~of ~~activities~~homes under construction. In addition, ~~None~~increases ofin the ~~Company’s~~price ~~employees~~of islumber ~~represented~~and byother amaterials ~~union~~have a ~~and~~negative ~~the~~impact ~~Company~~on ~~considers~~margins. In order to maintain its ~~employee~~quality standards ~~relationships~~while toproviding bea product at good. value, the Company has used and will under appropriate market

11 ~~Raw Materials~~

AllTable of the raw materials and most of the components used in the Company’s business are readily available in the United States. Most are standard items carried by major suppliers. However, a rapid increase in the number of homes started could cause shortages in the availability of such materials, thereby leading to delays in the delivery of homes under construction. In addition, increases in the price of lumber and other materials have a negative impact on margins. In order to maintain its quality standards while providing a product at good Contents

11 circumstances consider the further use of alternative materials, such as metal studs and framing in some of its projects.

~~Table~~Item of2. ~~Contents~~Properties

~~value,~~The ~~the~~ Company ~~has~~leases ~~used~~its ~~and~~office ~~will under~~facilities. ~~appropriate market circumstances consider the further use of~~ ~~alternative materials, such as metal studs and framing in some~~ ~~of its projects.~~

Item 23. ~~Properties~~Legal Proceedings

The Company ~~leases~~is involved in routine claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of its ~~office~~business. ~~facilities~~The legal responsibility and financial impact to the Company with respect to pending litigation cannot be presently ascertained. The previously disclosed suit styled in part as a shareholder derivative suit has been settled and the Company had no financial obligation under the settlement. A notice describing the proposed terms of the settlement and providing an opportunity to object was mailed to all shareholders in December 2002. After no objections were received a notice of the Court’s final approval of the settlement was mailed to all shareholders in February 2003.

Item 34. ~~Legal~~Submission ~~Proceedings~~of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

~~The Company is involved in routine claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business~~None. A ~~former senior executive officer of the Company has filed a suit~~ ~~styled in part as a shareholder derivative suit which the~~ ~~Company considers to be without merit challenging the Exchange~~ Transaction (described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company intends to vigorously defend its interests regarding this litigation, including pursuing all available counterclaims and appeals. The legal responsibility and financial impact to the Company with respect to pending litigation cannot be presently ascertained.

~~Item~~ PART ~~4. Submission of Matters to A Vote of Security Holders~~II

~~None~~Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

~~PART~~The IICompany’s Common Stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) under the Symbol “CPH.” The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices for the Common Stock for the fiscal periods indicated.

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters


		High		Low

Fiscal 2002
	Fourth Quarter	$	5.30	$	3.70
	Third Quarter		4.03		2.60
	Second Quarter		4.60		3.14
	First Quarter		4.65		2.75
Fiscal 2003
	Fourth Quarter	$	3.30	$	2.85
	Third Quarter		4.20		2.90
	Second Quarter		4.52		3.20
	First Quarter		4.90		3.11

~~The~~Payment of dividends is within the discretion of the Company’s ~~Common~~Board ~~Stock~~of isDirectors ~~traded~~and onholders ~~the~~of shares of ~~American~~Common Stock ~~Exchange~~are ~~(AMEX)~~entitled ~~under~~to receive dividends when and if declared by the ~~Symbol~~Board ~~“CPH.”~~of Directors out of funds contractually legally available therefor. The ~~following~~Company ~~table~~has ~~sets~~not ~~forth~~paid ~~the~~dividends for ~~quarterly~~over ~~high~~ten years, and ~~low~~has ~~sales~~historically retained its earnings. ~~prices~~There ~~for~~can ~~the~~be ~~Common~~no ~~Stock~~assurance ~~for~~that ~~the~~existing ~~fiscal~~contractual ~~periods~~limits ~~indicated~~may not become more restrictive.

		High		Low
Fiscal 2001
	Fourth Quarter	$	3.63	$	2.38
	Third Quarter		3.69		2.38
	Second Quarter		2.69		2.38
	First Quarter		3.00		2.75
Fiscal 2002
	Fourth Quarter	$	5.30	$	3.70
	Third Quarter		4.03		2.60
	Second Quarter		4.60		3.14
	First Quarter		4.65		2.75

On May 15, 2003, the Company had approximately 250 beneficial holders of its Common Stock.

12 ~~Payment of dividends is within the discretion of~~ ~~the Company’s Board of Directors and holders of shares of~~ ~~Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends when and if~~ declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. The Company has not paid dividends for over ten years, and has historically retained its earnings. The covenants in the Company’s syndicated loan documents have restrictions on permissible dividend payments to the Company from CPH LLC. There can be no assurance that such limits may not become more restrictive.

OnTable May 15, 2002, the Company had approximately 900 beneficial holders of its Common Stock. Contents

12 Item 6. Selected Financial Data

~~Table~~ The following selected consolidated financial data of ~~Contents~~the Company is presented as of and for the fiscal years ended February 28, 1999, February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001, February 28, 2002 and February 28, 2003. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, both of which are included elsewhere in this report. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data



		Last Day of February

		1999			2000			2001			2002			2003


		(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Income Statement Data:
Sales of homes and land		$	192,422		$	290,791		$	363,743		$	298,701		$	247,121
Cost of sales			(156,493	)		(231,273	)		(272,332	)		(226,373	)		(195,252	)
Interest expense(1)			(17,842	)		(22,141	)		(35,707	)		(28,932	)		(14,533	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses			(21,186	)		(30,813	)		(38,615	)		(36,301	)		(34,536	)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures			7,949			1,730			(874	)		746			1,748
Interest and other income, net			1,381			1,513			1,927			1,367			1,155

Income from operations			6,231			9,807			18,142			9,208			5,703
Minority interest(2)			(1,850	)		(2,835	)		(5,628	)		(159	)		—

Income before provision for income taxes, extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			4,381			6,972			12,514			9,049			5,703
Provision for income taxes			(1,095	)		(1,745	)		(1,786	)		(2,757	)		(1,486	)

Income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			3,286			5,227			10,728			6,292			4,217
Extraordinary item — gain on debt retired at less than face value, net of minority interest and taxes			—			955			1,461			—			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle — negative goodwill, net of tax effect			—			—			—			—			5,447

Net income		$	3,286		$	6,182		$	12,189		$	6,292		$	9,664

Earnings per common share — basic and diluted:
	Income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.23		$	0.37		$	0.77		$	0.43		$	0.28
	Extraordinary item		—			0.07			0.11			—			—
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			—			—			0.36

	Net income	$	0.23		$	0.44		$	0.88		$	0.43		$	0.64

Weighted average common shares — basic			14,237			13,923			13,773			14,620			14,906

Weighted average common shares — diluted(3)			14,271			14,014			13,896			14,795			14,958

Sales of homes and land (including unconsolidated joint ventures)		$	271,372		$	319,064		$	426,447		$	313,690		$	268,472

13 ~~The following selected consolidated financial~~ ~~data of the Company is presented as of and for the fiscal years~~ ~~ended February 28, 1998, February 28, 1999,~~ February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, both of which are included elsewhere in this report. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

	Last Day of February
	1998			1999			2000			2001			2002
	(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts, ratios and operating data)
Income Statement Data:
Sales of homes and land	$	191,098		$	192,422		$	290,791		$	363,743		$	298,701
Cost of sales		148,702			156,493			231,273			272,332			226,373
Impairment loss on real estate assets		8,000			—			—			—			—
Gross margin		34,396			35,929			59,518			91,411			72,328
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures		764			7,949			1,730			(874	)		746
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(24,744	)		(21,186	)		(30,813	)		(38,615	)		(36,301	)
Interest expense(1)		(14,264	)		(17,842	)		(22,141	)		(35,707	)		(28,932	)
Interest and other income, net		1,391			1,381			1,513			1,927			1,367
Income (loss) from operations		(2,457	)		6,231			9,807			18,142			9,208
Minority interest(2)		(469	)		(1,850	)		(2,835	)		(5,628	)		(159	)
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes and extraordinary item		(2,926	)		4,381			6,972			12,514			9,049
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(735	)		1,095			1,745			1,786			2,757
Income (loss) before extraordinary item		(2,191	)		3,286			5,227			10,728			6,292
Extraordinary item — gain on debt retired at less than face value, net of minority interest and taxes		—			—			955			1,461			—
Net income (loss)	$	(2,191	)	$	3,286		$	6,182		$	12,189		$	6,292
Earnings (loss) before extraordinary item per common share — basic and diluted	$	(0.15	)	$	0.23		$	0.37		$	0.77		$	0.43
Extraordinary item per common share		—			—			0.07			0.11			—
Earnings (loss) per common share — basic and diluted	$	(0.15	)	$	0.23		$	0.44		$	0.88		$	0.43
Weighted average common shares — basic		14,795			14,237			13,923			13,773			14,620
Weighted average common shares — diluted(3)		14,795			14,271			14,014			13,896			14,795
Sales of homes and land (including unconsolidated joint ventures)	$	214,093		$	271,372		$	319,064		$	426,447		$	313,690
EBITDA(4)	$	13,023		$	23,991		$	31,010		$	49,679		$	38,278
Interest incurred	$	20,400		$	22,300		$	24,500		$	25,700		$	14,800
EBITDA coverage		0.64x			1.08x			1.27x			1.93x			2.59x



	Last Day of February

	1999		2000		2001		2002		2003


	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance Sheet Data and Other Financial Data:
Real estate projects	$	261,333	$	282,497	$	259,873	$	203,685	$	184,891
Total assets		324,763		358,281		309,412		246,529		251,747
Notes payable		91,489		125,809		110,223		116,265		126,563
Senior unsecured notes payable(4)		100,000		88,392		55,592		—		—
Minority interest(4)		30,032		33,594		7,743		—		4,644
Stockholders’ equity(4)		65,354		70,886		82,780		93,114		100,399
Stockholders’ equity per share		4.66		5.13		6.01		6.26		6.73
Ratio of debt to total capitalization		0.75		0.75		0.67		0.56		0.56
Operating Data (including unconsolidated joint ventures, in units):
Homes delivered		932		1,296		1,209		839		720
Total homes and lots delivered		982		2,006		2,199		1,134		1,467
Net new orders		1,053		1,397		1,155		782		869
Homes in backlog		497		598		512		194		296
Dollars in backlog	$	124,000	$	166,400	$	173,600	$	74,300	$	79,600


(1)	Represents interest costs initially capitalized to real estate projects which are recognized as interest expense as homes and land are sold.

(2)	Includes the minority interest share of earnings in CPH LLC since the financial restructuring in fiscal year 1998, ending in fiscal 2002.

(3)	Reflects dilution due to outstanding warrants and stock options. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4)	At February 28, 1999, February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001, respectively, minority interest includes $29.9 million, $32.6 million and $7.7 million of capital in CPH LLC attributable to California Housing Finance, L.P. (“CHF”). At February 28, 1999, February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively, CPH LLC had total capital of $92.5 million, $100.1 million, $109.5 million, $109.5 million and $107.3 million and was the sole obligor for the balance of the Senior Unsecured Notes Payable, until they were repaid during fiscal 2002. At February 28, 2003, minority interest represents capital attributable to a non- affiliated investor in a consolidated joint venture.

	Last Day of February
	1998		1999		2000		2001		2002
	(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts, ratios and operating data)
Balance Sheet Data and Other Financial Data:
Real estate projects	$	192,347	$	261,333	$	282,497	$	259,873	$	203,685
Total assets		251,655		324,763		358,281		309,412		250,195
Notes payable		36,714		91,489		125,809		110,223		116,265
Senior unsecured notes payable(5)		100,000		100,000		88,392		55,592		—
Minority interest(5)		30,061		30,032		33,594		7,743		—
Stockholders’ equity(5)		63,050		65,354		70,886		82,780		93,114
Stockholders’ equity per share		4.41		4.66		5.13		6.01		6.26
Ratio of debt to total capitalization		0.68		0.75		0.75		0.67		0.56
Operating Data (including unconsolidated joint ventures, in units):
Homes delivered		909		932		1,296		1,209		839
Total homes and lots delivered		969		982		2,006		2,199		1,134
Net new orders		919		1,053		1,397		1,155		782
Homes in backlog		376		497		598		512		194
Dollars in backlog	$	115,000	$	124,000	$	166,400	$	173,600	$	74,300

(1)	Represents interest costs initially capitalized to real estate projects which are recognized as interest expense as homes and land are sold.
(2)	Includes the minority interest share of earnings in CPH LLC since the financial restructuring in fiscal year 1998.
(3)	Reflects dilution due to outstanding warrants and stock options. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)	EBITDA means earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, excluding accretion of negative goodwill and deferred gain, and extraordinary items. EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator of a company’s ability to service debt. However, EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or to cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) and should not be construed as an indication of operating performance or as a measure of liquidity.
(5)	At February 28, 1998 and 1999, February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001, respectively, minority interest includes $29.8 million, $29.9 million, $32.6 million and $7.7 million of capital in CPH LLC attributable to California Housing Finance, L.P. (“CHF”). At February 28, 1998 and 1999, February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002, respectively, CPH LLC had total capital of $91.4 million, $92.5 million, $100.1 million, $109.5 million and $109.5 million and was the sole obligor for the balance of the Senior Unsecured Notes Payable, until they were repaid during fiscal 2002.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Information is Subject to Risk and Uncertainty

Certain statements in the financial discussion and analysis by management contain “forward-looking” information (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that involves risk and uncertainty, including projections and assumptions regarding the business environment in which the Company operates. Actual future results and trends may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, including the Company’s successful execution of internal performance strategies; changes in general national and regional economic conditions, such as levels of employment, consumer confidence and income, uncertainty arising from acts of war and terrorism and similar factors, availability to to homebuilders of financing for acquisitions, development and construction, availability to homebuyers of permanent mortgages, interest rate levels and the demand for housing; supply levels of land, utilities and other services, labor and materials; difficulties in obtaining permits or approvals from governmental authorities; difficulties in marketing homes; regulatory changes and weather and other environmental uncertainties; competitive influences; and the outcome of pending and future legal claims and proceedings; and other influences.

~~Results of Operations — General~~14

As is noted in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein, the Company is reporting its results on a consolidated basis with the results of its wholly-owned subsidiaries including CPH LLC. References to the Company in this Item 7 are, unless the context indicates otherwise, also references to such subsidiaries. At the current time, all material financing transactions and arrangements are incurred either by CPH LLC or by project-specific entities.

The following table illustrates the actual results of the Company’s operations, as well as the results including the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures, for the past three fiscal years. The actual results have been adjusted to reflect the inclusion of the operating results of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures, including the portion attributable to the Company’s joint venture partners, in order to facilitate the discussion of the overall results in certain portions of the discussion below.

Results of Operations

(Amounts in thousands)

		Year Ended
		February 29, 2000				February 28, 2001				February 28, 2002
				Including				Including				Including
		Consolidated		Joint Ventures		Consolidated		Joint Ventures		Consolidated		Joint Ventures
Sales of homes and land		$	290,791	$	319,064	$	363,743	$	426,447	$	298,701	$	313,690
Cost of sales			231,273		254,666		272,332		319,951		226,373		239,113
	Gross margin	$	59,518	$	64,398	$	91,411	$	106,496	$	72,328	$	74,577

During fiscal 2000 and 2001, the amounts in the table above including joint ventures include $6 million and $63 million of revenue, respectively, representing 7 and 46 unit closings, respectively, in joint ventures which became Managed Projects as a result of the Exchange Transaction. During the year ended February 28, 2002, activity in these projects included 26 home closings and revenues of $45.2 million in three Managed Projects, for which the Company was responsible for construction and marketing activity and in which the Company’s sole economic interest is through management agreements.

Prior to February 23, 2001, CPH, Inc. had an interest in various joint ventures (the “Divested Projects”) with an unaffiliated entity, CHF. The Company’s interest in these projects was typically as managing member with a 0.7% capital interest and a contingent profits interest (after payment of debt, return of capital and a preferred return) of approximately 30%. On that date and in a follow-on closing on May 31, 2001, the Company divested its interest in these assets in a transaction (the “Exchange Transaction”) in which CHF

~~transferred~~Results to the Company its 32.07% interest in CPH LLC and in the Newport and Yucaipa homebuilding joint ventures in California in return for the Company’s capital and contingent profits interest in the Divested Projects and 1,235,000 newly issued shares of ~~its non-voting Common Stock.~~Operations — General

As is noted in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein, the Company is reporting its results on a ~~result~~consolidated basis with the results of its wholly-owned subsidiaries including CPH LLC. References to the ~~Exchange~~Company ~~Transaction:~~in this Item 7 are, unless the context indicates otherwise, also references to such subsidiaries. At the current time, all material financing transactions and arrangements are incurred either by CPH LLC or by project-specific entities, or in the case of Managed Projects, by the owner of such projects.

• The ~~CPH,~~following ~~Inc.~~table ~~increased~~illustrates ~~its ownership interest in CPH LLC, which had at~~ the ~~end~~actual results of ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~Company’s ~~2002 a net worth of $109.5 million~~operations, ~~from~~as ~~68%~~well toas ~~100%.~~the •results including ~~CPH, Inc. also increased its ownership interest in~~ the ~~Newport Coast and Yucaipa projects in California from 68% to 100%. • The~~ Company’s ~~enhanced~~unconsolidated ~~its~~joint ~~business~~ventures, ~~focus on homebuilding. • CPH LLC was able to substantially lower its borrowing costs by redeeming~~ for the ~~remainder~~past ofthree ~~its 12 3/4% Senior Notes and obtaining an unsecured syndicated revolving line of credit with an average borrowing cost of 5.5% in~~ fiscal ~~2002~~years. •The ~~CPH,~~actual ~~Inc.~~results ~~eliminated~~have ~~the~~been adjusted ~~risk of being required~~ to ~~fund~~reflect ~~its~~the ~~portion~~inclusion of the ~~future~~operating ~~capital~~results ~~needs~~ of the ~~Divested Projects. • Including through earnings during the period, the~~ Company ~~has increased CPH, Inc.~~’s ~~stockholder’s~~unconsolidated ~~equity~~joint ~~by $10.3 million since February 28~~ventures, ~~2001,~~including ~~from~~the portion ~~$82.8~~attributable ~~million~~ to ~~$93.1 million. • As~~ the ~~financial~~Company’s ~~statement~~joint ~~effects of the Exchange Transaction are fully realized~~venture partners, ~~stockholders’ equity will further increase by the remaining $5.4 million~~ in ~~negative~~order ~~goodwill~~to asfacilitate ~~well as~~ the ~~remaining~~discussion ~~$2.8 million~~ of the ~~deferred~~overall results ~~gain~~in ~~generated~~certain byportions ~~the disposition~~ of the ~~Company’s~~discussion ~~non-core assets~~below. •In addition, ~~Once~~for ~~the~~fiscal ~~accounting~~2002 ~~effects~~and offiscal ~~the Exchange Transaction are fully realized~~2003, ~~stockholder’s~~the ~~equity~~table ~~per~~presents results ~~share~~including ~~will~~the ~~have~~Managed ~~increased by $0~~Projects.~~99 or 17% solely as a result of the transaction.~~

Results of Operations

(Amounts in thousands)



		Year Ended


		February 28, 2001				February 28, 2002						February 28, 2003

										Including						Including
				Including				Including		Joint Ventures				Including		Joint Ventures
				Joint				Joint		and Managed				Joint		and Managed
		Consolidated		Ventures		Consolidated		Ventures		Projects		Consolidated		Ventures		Projects

Sales of homes and land		$	363,743	$	426,447	$	298,701	$	313,690	$	358,929	$	247,121	$	268,472	$	297,592
Cost of sales			272,332		319,951		226,373		239,113		275,376		195,252		212,000		233,587

	Gross margin	$	91,411	$	106,496	$	72,328	$	74,577	$	83,553	$	51,869	$	56,472	$	64,005

Cost of sales, as shown above, does not include the amount of previously capitalized interest costs which are included in interest expense. As a result, the gross margin also does not reflect the impact of previously capitalized interest costs included in interest expense. Industry practice among homebuilders varies, but Company management feels that gross margin, exclusive of interest expense, is the most relevant comparable measure given the Company’s historical capital structure.

During fiscal 2001, the amounts in the table above including joint ventures include $63 million of revenue representing 46 unit closings in joint ventures which became Managed Projects as a result of the Exchange Transaction.

In addition to the results shown above, the Company was responsible for the following activity in certain Managed Projects (including the Divested Joint Ventures) for the fiscal years 2002 and 2003:

Managed and Divested Operations

(Dollar amounts in thousands)


	Fiscal 2002		Fiscal 2003

Number of Managed Projects		3		3
Unit closings		26		21
Revenues	$	45,239	$	29,120

During fiscal years 2002 and 2003, the Company was responsible for construction and marketing activity in the Managed Projects and the Company’s sole economic interest is through management arrangements.

preferred return) of approximately 30%. On that date and in a follow-on closing on May 31, 2001, the Company divested its interest in these assets in a transaction (the “Exchange Transaction”) in which CHF transferred to the Company its 32.07% interest in CPH LLC and in the Newport and Yucaipa homebuilding joint ventures in California in return for the Company’s capital and contingent profits interest in the Divested Projects and 1,235,000 newly issued shares of its non-voting Common Stock.


	*Fiscal 2003 (Year Ended February 28, 2003) Compared to Fiscal 2002 (Year Ended February 28, 2002)*

The Company reported net income of $9.7 million, or $0.64 per share, in fiscal 2003, as compared to net income of $6.3 million, or $0.43 per share, in fiscal 2002. Net income in fiscal 2003 included a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle which increased income by $5.4 million, or $0.36 per share. Excluding the effect of cumulative change in accounting principle, net income decreased from $6.3 million in fiscal 2002 to $4.2 million in fiscal 2003. The Company reported income from operations of $5.7 million in fiscal 2003, as compared to income from operations of $9.2 million in fiscal 2002.

On a consolidated basis, sales of homes and land decreased from $298.7 million in fiscal 2002 to $247.1 million in fiscal 2003. This decrease is due to a decrease in total home closings and average sales price per home, partially offset by increased lot closings between periods. Of these totals, sales of land and lots accounted for $15.4 million and $30.9 million in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003, respectively. On a consolidated basis, home and lot closings increased from 1,081 in fiscal 2002 to 1,390 in fiscal 2003. Sales of homes and land including unconsolidated joint ventures were $268.5 million for fiscal 2003 compared to $313.7 million for fiscal 2002. The decrease was due to a decrease in home closings from 839 for fiscal 2002 to 720 in fiscal 2003 as well as a decrease in average sales price. Total unit closings increased from 1,134 in fiscal 2002 to 1,467 in fiscal 2003, including 53 and 63 homes, respectively, closed in unconsolidated joint ventures. The increase in total unit closings was due primarily to a significant increase in total lot closings from 295 in fiscal 2002 to 747 in fiscal 2003. In addition, 14 lots were closed in unconsolidated joint ventures in fiscal 2003. In accordance with the Company’s strategy to lower its exposure to the higher end of the home sales market, the average home sales price decreased from $346,000 in fiscal 2002 to $330,000 in fiscal 2003.

The number of actively selling projects (not including the Managed Projects) has increased from 22 at February 28, 2002 to 27 at February 28, 2003, which affected both backlog and net new orders. The Company anticipates opening between 20 and 25 new communities over the next fiscal year in the following markets:


		Approximate
		Number of		Approximate
Market		New Projects		Number of Lots

California			6-8		329-705
Texas			5-7		868-1,302
Arizona			7-7		732-732
Colorado			2-3		279-355

	Total		20-25		2,208-3,094

Certain of these projects contain lots which may ultimately be sold to other builders. Taking into account the close out of between 12 and 15 currently selling projects, the Company expects a net increase in selling projects of between 8 and 10 projects during fiscal 2004.

The Company’s gross margin decreased from 24.2% in fiscal 2002 to 21.0% in fiscal 2003, due to a continued shift in the mix of closings to certain higher volume, lower-margin projects and the close out of certain less profitable projects in certain markets. The gross margin, including unconsolidated joint ventures, decreased from 23.8% in fiscal 2002 to 21.0% in fiscal 2003.

Selling, general and administrative expense of $34.5 million for fiscal 2003 decreased $1.8 million or 4.9% as compared to fiscal 2002 due primarily to a lower level of sales activity. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expense increased from 12.2% in fiscal 2002 to 14.0% in fiscal 2003. The increased percentage was primarily due to lower volume of revenue in fiscal 2003, combined with an increase in certain

non-recurring expenses, including litigation expense, the write off of certain abandoned projects and charges related to a reduction in work force in the Company’s Texas division.

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased from $746,000 in fiscal 2002 to $1.8 million in fiscal 2003, due primarily to slightly higher volume and higher per unit profitability in the current joint ventures.

Interest and other income decreased slightly from $1.4 million in fiscal 2002 to $1.2 million in fiscal 2003 and consists primarily of the results of operations of the Company’s mortgage broker operations, as well as certain financing and other transactions.

Minority interest of $159,000 in fiscal 2002 primarily represents the share of income from CPH LLC attributable to CHF, until the Company acquired the remaining minority interest in CPH LLC on May 31, 2001.

Interest incurred was $10.3 million in fiscal 2003, as compared to $14.8 million in fiscal 2002, while interest expensed was $14.5 million in fiscal 2003 as compared to $28.9 million in fiscal 2002. Due both to selling out of older projects with higher capitalized interest and the Company’s substantially reduced borrowing costs, the Company expects interest incurred and interest expensed to continue to decline in future periods. Substantially all interest costs are initially capitalized to real estate projects and are recognized as interest expense as homes and land are sold.

The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $1.5 million in fiscal 2003, as compared to $2.8 million in fiscal 2002. The effective tax rate was reduced from the statutory rate in both years due to the impact of amortizing negative goodwill. The Company expects its effective tax rate to approximate 40 percent in future years.


	*Fiscal 2002 (Year Ended February 28, 2002) Compared to Fiscal 2001 (Year Ended February 28, 2001)*

The Company reported income from operations of $9.2 million in fiscal 2002, as compared to income from operations of $18.1 million in fiscal 2001. The Company reported net income of $6.3 million, or $0.43 per share, in fiscal 2002, as compared to net income before extraordinary item of $10.7 million, or $0.77 per share, in fiscal 2001. The Company also experienced an extraordinary gain of $1.5 million, or $0.11 per share, in fiscal 2001, as a result of the retirement of debt at less than face value.

On a consolidated basis, sales of homes and land decreased from $363.7 million in fiscal 2001 to $298.7 million in fiscal 2002. This decrease is due to a decrease in total home and lot closings, partially offset by an increase in the Company’s average sales price per home between periods. On a consolidated basis, home and lot closings decreased from 2,153 in fiscal 2001 to 1,081 in fiscal 2002. ~~Sales of homes and land including unconsolidated joint ventures~~ ~~were $313.7 million for fiscal 2002 compared to~~ $426.4 million for fiscal 2001. The decrease was due to a decrease in total unit closings from 2,199 for fiscal 2001 to 1,134 in fiscal 2002 partially offset by an increase in average sales price. Home closings declined from 1,209 in fiscal 2001 to 839 in fiscal 2002, including 46 and 53 homes, respectively, closed in unconsolidated joint ventures. The average home sales price increased from $315,000 in fiscal 2001 to $346,000 in fiscal 2002.

~~The~~Sales ~~decrease~~of inhomes ~~total~~and ~~unit~~land ~~closings~~including ~~was due~~unconsolidated ~~primarily~~joint toventures awere ~~reduction~~$313.7 million infor ~~actively~~fiscal ~~selling~~2002 ~~projects between~~compared ~~periods,~~to ~~the~~$426.4 million ~~Company’s~~for ~~exit~~fiscal ~~from~~2001. ~~the~~Of ~~Nevada~~these ~~market~~totals, sales of land and ~~an unusual~~lots ~~level~~accounted offor ~~lot~~$15.4 million ~~closings~~and $31.4 million in fiscal ~~2001.~~2002 ~~The~~and ~~increase~~fiscal in2001, respectively. ~~average~~The ~~sales~~decrease ~~price~~was is due to ~~the~~a ~~closing~~decrease ofin atotal ~~higher~~unit ~~number~~closings offrom ~~units~~2,199 infor ~~the~~fiscal ~~higher-priced~~2001 ~~California~~to ~~market~~1,134 in fiscal 2002. ~~The~~partially offset ~~decrease~~by inan ~~the~~increase ~~Company’s~~in ~~backlog~~average ~~from~~sales ~~512~~price. ~~units~~Home atclosings declined ~~February 28,~~from ~~2001 to 194 units at February 28~~1,209 ~~2002~~in ~~is also~~fiscal ~~primarily~~2001 ~~due~~ to a839 ~~decrease~~ in ~~selling~~fiscal ~~projects~~2002, inincluding ~~certain~~46 ~~of the Company’s markets~~ and to53 ahomes, ~~lesser extent~~respectively, ~~the reduction~~closed in ~~backlog~~unconsolidated ~~units in Nevada in connection with the~~joint ~~Company’s exit from that market~~ventures. The ~~number~~average ofhome ~~actively selling~~sales ~~projects~~price ~~(not~~increased ~~including the Managed Projects) has decreased~~ from ~~26 at February 28~~$315,000 in fiscal 2001 to ~~22 at February 28~~$346,000 ~~2002,~~in ~~which~~fiscal ~~affected both backlog and net new orders~~2002. ~~The~~

16 The decrease in total unit closings was due primarily to a reduction in actively selling projects between periods, the Company’s exit from the Nevada market and an unusual level of lot closings in fiscal 2001. The increase in average sales price is due to the closing of a higher number of units in the higher-priced California market in fiscal 2002. The decrease in the Company’s backlog from 512 units at February 28, 2001 to 194 units at February 28, 2002 is also primarily due to a decrease in selling projects in certain of the Company’s markets and to a lesser extent, the reduction in backlog units in Nevada in connection with the Company’s exit from that market. The number of actively selling projects (not including the Managed Projects) decreased from 26 at February 28, 2001 to 22 at February 28, 2002, which affected both backlog and net new orders.

~~Company~~profitable ~~anticipates~~projects. ~~opening~~The ~~between~~gross 18margin, ~~and~~including unconsolidated 24joint ~~new communities~~ventures, ~~over~~decreased ~~the~~from ~~next~~25.0% in fiscal 2001 ~~year~~to 23.8% in ~~the~~fiscal ~~following markets:~~2002.

		Approximate
		Number of		Approximate
Market		New Projects		Number of Lots
California			6-8		589-648
Texas			4-6		273-759
Arizona			5-6		511-699
Colorado			3-4		608-758
	Total		18-24		1,981-2,864

Certain of these projects contain lots which may ultimately be sold to other builders. The Company expects a net increase in selling projects of between 11 and 18 projects during fiscal 2003, due to the close out of between 6 and 7 currently selling projects.

The Company’s gross margin decreased from 25.1% in fiscal 2001 to 24.2% in fiscal 2002, due to a change in the mix of closings to certain higher volume, lower-margin projects and the close out of certain less profitable projects. The gross margin, including unconsolidated joint ventures, decreased from 25.0% in fiscal 2001 to 23.8% in fiscal 2002.

Selling, general and administrative expense of $36.3 million for fiscal 2002 decreased $2.3 million or 6.0% as compared to fiscal 2001 due primarily to a lower level of sales activity. As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expense increased from 10.6% in fiscal 2001 to 12.2% in fiscal 2002. The increased percentage was primarily due to lower volume of revenue in fiscal 2002.

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased from a loss of $874,000 in fiscal 2001 to income of $746,000 in fiscal 2002, due to the establishment of certain reserves in connection with the wind down in fiscal 2001 of some of the older joint ventures, and the benefit of certain newer joint ventures generating profits in fiscal 2002.

Interest and other income decreased from $1.9 million in fiscal 2001 to $1.4 million in fiscal 2002 and consists primarily of the results of operations of the Company’s mortgage broker operations, as well as certain financing and other transactions.

Minority interest of $5.6 million in fiscal 2001 and $159,000 in fiscal 2002 primarily represents the share of income from CPH LLC and CPH Newport Coast, LLC attributable to CHF, until the Company acquired the remaining minority interest in CPH LLC on May 31, 2001.

Interest incurred was $14.8 million in fiscal 2002, as compared to $25.7 million in fiscal 2001, while interest expensed was $28.9 million in fiscal 2002 as compared to $35.7 million in fiscal 2001. Due both to selling out of older projects with higher capitalized interest and the Company’s substantially reduced borrowing costs, the Company expects interest incurred and interest expensed to continue to drop in future periods. Substantially all interest costs are initially capitalized to real estate projects and are recognized as interest expense as homes and land are sold.

The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $2.8 million in fiscal 2002, as compared to $1.8 million in fiscal 2001. The effective tax rate was reduced from the statutory rate in fiscal 2002 due to the impact of amortizing negative goodwill, and in fiscal 2001 primarily through the reversal of the Company’s previously established valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was reduced to zero at February 28, 2001~~, and the Company expects its effective tax rate to approximate 40 percent in future years~~.

Fiscal 2001 (Year Ended February 28, 2001) Compared to Fiscal 2000 (Year Ended February 29, 2000)

The Company reported income from operations of $18.1 million in fiscal 2001, as compared to income from operations of $9.8 million in fiscal 2000. The Company reported net income of $12.2 million, or $0.88 per share, in fiscal 2001, as compared to net income of $6.2 million, or $0.44 per share, in fiscal 2000. Net income

for fiscal 2001 included an extraordinary gain of $1.5 million, or $0.11 per share, as compared to $1.0 million, or $0.07 per share, in fiscal 2000, as a result of the retirement of debt at less than face value.

On a consolidated basis, sales of homes and land increased from $290.8 million in fiscal 2000 to $363.7 million in fiscal 2001. Home and lot closings increased from 1,978 in fiscal 2000 to 2,153 in fiscal 2001. Sales of homes and land including unconsolidated joint ventures were $426.4 million for fiscal 2001 compared to $319.1 million for fiscal 2000. The increase was due to an increase in total unit closings from 2,006 for fiscal 2000 to 2,199 in fiscal 2001 and an increase in average sales price. Home closings declined slightly from 1,296 in fiscal 2000 to 1,209 in fiscal 2001, including 28 and 46 homes, respectively, closed in unconsolidated joint ventures. The average home sales price increased from $233,000 in fiscal 2000 to $315,000 in fiscal 2001.

The increase in total unit closings was due primarily to increased activity in the Company’s Colorado market and to a few significant lot sales. The increase in average sales price was due to the closing of a higher number of units in the higher-priced California market in fiscal 2001. The Company’s actual gross margin increased from 20.5% in fiscal 2000 to 25.1% in fiscal 2001, due to a change in the mix of closings to certain higher-margin projects. The gross margin including unconsolidated joint ventures increased from 20.2% in fiscal 2000 to 25.0% in fiscal 2001.

As a percentage of revenue, selling, general and administrative expense remained stable at 10.6% in both fiscal 2000 and fiscal 2001. Selling, general and administrative expense of $38.6 million for fiscal 2001 increased $7.8 million or 25.3% as compared to fiscal 2000 due to a higher level of sales activity.

Income from unconsolidated joint ventures decreased from $1.7 million fiscal 2000 to a loss of $874,000 in fiscal 2001, due to the establishment of certain reserves in connection with the wind down of some of the older joint ventures, as well as the fact that the profits from the newer joint ventures were being allocated primarily to cover preferred return on partner’s capital during fiscal 2001.

Interest and other income increased from $1.5 million in fiscal 2000 to $1.9 million in fiscal 2001 and consists primarily of the results of operations of the Company’s mortgage broker operations, as well as certain financing and other transactions.

Minority interest of $2.8 million in fiscal 2000 and $5.6 million in fiscal 2001 primarily represents the share of income from CPH LLC and CPH Newport Coast, LLC attributable to CHF.

Interest incurred was $25.7 million in fiscal 2001, as compared to $24.5 million in fiscal 2000, while interest expensed was $35.7 million in fiscal 2001 as compared to $22.1 million in fiscal 2000. Substantially all interest costs are initially capitalized to real estate projects and are recognized as interest expense as homes and land are sold. As presented in the consolidated statements of operations, income from unconsolidated joint ventures for fiscal 2000 excludes the recognition of approximately $519,000 in interest previously capitalized to the lots contributed to MPE. Such interest costs are included in interest expense.

The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $1.8 million in fiscal 2001, as compared to $1.7 million in fiscal 2000. The effective tax rate in both years was reduced from the statutory rate by the use of available loss carryforwards. Such loss carryforwards have now been substantially fully utilized.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s principal cash requirements are for the acquisition, development, construction, marketing and overhead of its projects. When building inventory, the Company uses substantial amounts of cash that are generally obtained from borrowings, available cash flow from operations and partners’ contributions to joint ventures.

At the current time, all material financing transactions and arrangements are incurred either by CPH LLC or by certain project-specific entities. During ~~the~~fiscal ~~third~~2003, ~~quarter~~CPH ofLLC ~~fiscal~~renewed ~~2002,~~and ~~CPH~~extended ~~LLC~~the ~~entered~~maturity ~~into~~of aits senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“the Senior Facility”) with several participant banks. The facility ~~has~~was aincreased ~~maximum commitment~~from of$130 million to $~~125~~140 million ~~and~~subsequent ato ~~two~~the fiscal 2003 year end. The facility currently has a three year revolving term through October 2005. Proceeds from this facility were used to pay down CPH LLC’s existing facilities and retire the remaining Senior Notes during fiscal 2002, as discussed below. In addition, in fiscal 2003, the Company ~~quarter~~entered into a Senior Subordinated Note Agreement in the initial amount of $20 million, with a maturity date in October 2007.

As of February 28, 2003, the Company has in place credit facilities, including the Senior Facility, totaling $208 million (the “Facilities”) with various bank lenders (the “Banks”), of which approximately $120 million was outstanding. The Facilities other than the Senior Facility are secured by liens on various completed or under construction homes and lots held by certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. Pursuant to the Facilities, the Company and the wholly-owned subsidiaries are subject to certain covenants, which require, among other things, the maintenance of a consolidated liabilities to net worth ratio, minimum liquidity, minimum net worth and loss limitations, all as defined in the documents that evidence the Facilities. At February 28, 2003, the Company and the wholly-owned subsidiaries were in compliance with these covenants.

~~ending~~The ~~November 30,~~Facilities ~~2001,~~also asdefine ~~discussed~~certain events that ~~below.~~constitute ~~The~~events ~~new~~of ~~credit~~default. ~~facility~~As ~~has~~of ~~substantially~~February 28, ~~more~~2003, ~~favorable~~no ~~pricing~~such ~~than~~event ~~the~~had ~~Senior~~occurred. ~~Notes~~Commitment ~~which~~fees ~~have~~are ~~been~~payable ~~retired~~annually on some of the Facilities.

AsHomebuilding ofactivity ~~February 28,~~is ~~2002,~~being ~~the~~financed ~~Company~~out ~~has in~~of ~~place~~CPH ~~several~~LLC ~~credit facilities~~cash, ~~including the Senior Facility, totaling $181 million (the “Facilities”) with various~~ bank ~~lenders (the “Banks”)~~financing, ofand ~~which approximately $109 million was outstanding. The Facilities other than~~ the ~~Senior~~existing ~~Facility~~joint ~~are secured by liens on various completed or under construction homes and lots held by CPH LLC~~ventures, ~~CPH~~including ~~Newport~~joint ~~Coast,~~ventures ~~LLC~~with ~~and~~institutional ~~CPH Yucaipa I, LLC, all of which are wholly-owned subsidiaries~~investors. ~~Pursuant to the Facilities, the~~ ~~Company~~Development ~~and~~work ~~the~~undertaken ~~wholly-owned~~in ~~subsidiaries are subject to~~ certain ~~covenants,~~ ~~which~~of ~~require, among other things,~~ the ~~maintenance of~~Company’s ajoint ~~consolidated~~ventures ~~liabilities~~is tofinanced ~~net~~through ~~worth~~various ~~ratio,~~non-recourse ~~minimum~~lending ~~liquidity,~~arrangements. ~~minimum~~Additional ~~net~~lot ~~worth~~development ~~and~~activity ~~loss~~is ~~limitations, all as~~enhanced ~~defined~~through invarious ~~the~~arrangements ~~documents~~outside ~~that evidence~~ the ~~Facilities~~Senior Facility. AtThe ~~February 28, 2002, the~~ Company ~~and~~anticipates ~~the~~that ~~wholly-owned subsidiaries~~it ~~were~~will incontinue ~~compliance~~to ~~with~~utilize ~~these~~both ~~covenants. The~~third ~~Facilities~~party ~~also~~financing ~~define~~and ~~certain~~joint ~~events~~ventures ~~that~~to ~~constitute~~cover ~~events~~financing ofneeds in ~~default.~~excess As of ~~February 28,~~internally ~~2002,~~generated nocash ~~such event had occurred~~flow. ~~Commitment fees are payable annually on some of the~~ ~~Facilities.~~

Homebuilding activity is being financed out of CPH LLC cash, bank financing, and the existing joint ventures, including joint ventures with institutional investors. In addition, development work undertaken in certain of the Company’s joint ventures is financed through various non-recourse lending arrangements. The Company anticipates that it will continue to utilize both third party financing and joint ventures to cover financing needs in excess of internally generated cash flow.

Management expects that cash flow generated from operations and from bank financing will be sufficient to cover the debt service and to fund CPH LLC’s current development and homebuilding activities for the reasonably foreseeable future, and expects that capital commitments from its joint venture partners and other bank facilities will provide sufficient financing for the operation of its joint ventures.

Interest Rates and Inflation

Housing demand, in general, is adversely affected by increases in interest costs, as well as materials and other costs, which cause increases in home sale prices. Interest rates, the length of time that land remains in inventory and the proportion of inventory that is financed affect the Company’s interest costs. If the Company is unable to duplicate its past ability to raise sales prices enough to compensate for higher costs, or if mortgage interest rates increase significantly, affecting prospective buyers’ ability to adequately finance a home purchase, the Company’s homebuilding revenues, gross margins and net income would be adversely affected. Increases in sales prices, whether the result of inflation or demand, may affect the ability of prospective buyers to afford a new home.

The long-term impact of inflation on the Company is manifested in increased land prices, land development, construction and overhead costs balanced by increased sales prices. The Company generally contracts for land significantly before development and sales efforts begin and, accordingly, to the extent land acquisition costs are fixed, increases or decreases in the sales prices of homes, land and other real estate properties may affect the Company’s profits. Since the sales prices of homes are fixed at the time of sale and the Company generally sells its homes prior to commencement of construction, any inflation of construction costs in excess of those anticipated may result in lower gross margins. The Company generally attempts to minimize that effect by entering into fixed-price contracts with its subcontractors and material suppliers for specified periods of time, which generally do not exceed one year.

Housing demand, in general, is adversely affected by increases in interest costs, as well as materials and other costs. Interest rates, the length of time that land remains in inventory and the proportion of inventory that is financed affect the Company’s interest costs. If the Company is unable to duplicate its past ability to raise sales prices enough to compensate for higher costs, or if mortgage interest rates increase significantly, affecting prospective buyers’ ability to adequately finance a home purchase, the Company’s homebuilding revenues, gross margins and net income would be adversely affected. Increases in sales prices, whether the result of inflation or demand, may affect the ability of prospective buyers to afford a new home.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and costs and expenses during the reporting period. Management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those which ~~impact~~offset its most critical accounting policies on an ongoing basis. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, within the framework of current accounting literature. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the following accounting policies are among the most important to accurately report the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require among the most subjective or complicated judgments, which are subject to uncertainty and the potential for change in subsequent accounting periods.


	*Revenue Recognition, Real Estate Projects and Cost of Sales*

~~conditions~~Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 66, ~~Management~~“Accounting ~~believes~~for Sales of Real Estate.” When it is determined that the earnings process is not complete, ~~following~~profit ~~accounting~~is ~~policies~~deferred ~~are~~for ~~among~~recognition in future periods. Examples of such circumstances would be if the ~~most~~Company ~~important~~sells toand leases ~~accurately~~back ~~report~~a model home, or if the Company’s ~~financial~~takes ~~condition~~a ~~and~~buyer’s home ~~results~~in oftrade. ~~operations~~The ~~and~~profit ~~require~~recorded ~~among~~by the ~~most~~Company ~~subjective~~is orbased on the ~~complicated~~calculation ~~judgments,~~of ~~which~~cost ~~are~~of ~~subject~~sales towhich ~~uncertainty~~is ~~and~~dependent on the ~~potential~~Company’s allocation of costs, including a provision for estimated ~~change~~future inwarranty ~~subsequent~~costs, ~~accounting~~as ~~periods:~~discussed below.

Revenue Recognition, Real Estate Projects and Cost of Sales

A sale is recorded and profit is recognized when a sale is consummated, the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate, any receivables are not subject to future subordination, and the usual risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” When it is determined that the earnings process is not complete, profit is deferred for recognition in future periods. Examples of such circumstances would be if the Company sells and leases back a model home, or if the Company takes a buyer’s home in trade. The profit recorded by the Company is based on the calculation of cost of sales which is dependent on the Company’s allocation of costs, including a provision for estimated future warranty costs, as discussed below.

Real estate projects are carried at cost, net of impairment losses, if any. Real estate projects consist primarily of raw land, lots under development, houses under construction and completed houses. All direct and indirect land costs, offsite and onsite improvements and applicable interest and other carrying charges are capitalized to real estate projects during periods when the project is under development. Land, offsite costs and all other common costs, including projected indirect construction costs and carrying costs, are typically allocated to lots benefited within a project based upon relative sales values before construction. Onsite direct construction costs are allocated to the individual homes based upon the relative sales value of the homes. The estimation process involved in determining relative sales values is inherently uncertain because it involves estimates of current market values for land parcels before construction as well as future sales values of individual homes. The Company’s estimates of future sales values are supported by the Company’s budgeting process. Any estimate of future sales values is inherently uncertain because it requires estimates of current market conditions as well as future market events and conditions. The impact of applying the relative sales value method can be significant in the case where certain lots in a project are expected to command high premiums for views, lot size or other desirable attributes, in comparison with other lots within the same project. Additionally, in determining the allocation of costs to a particular land parcel or individual home, the Company relies on project budgets that are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions about construction schedules and future costs to be incurred. It is possible that actual results could differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including construction delays, increases in costs which have not yet been committed, or unforeseen issues encountered during construction that fall outside the scope of contracts obtained. While the actual results for a particular construction project are accurately reported over time, a variance between the budget and actual costs could result in the understatement or overstatement of costs and a related impact on gross margins in a specific reporting period. To reduce the potential for such distortion, the Company has set forth procedures which have been applied by the Company on a consistent basis, including assessing and revising project budgets on a monthly basis, obtaining, where possible, commitments from subcontractors and vendors for future costs to be incurred, reviewing the adequacy of warranty accruals and historical warranty claims experience, and utilizing the most recent information available to estimate costs. Management believes that the Company’s policies provide for reasonably dependable estimates to be used in the calculation and reporting of costs. The Company relieves its accumulated real estate projects through cost of sales and interest expense for the cost of homes sold.


	*Impairment of Real Estate Projects*

~~SFAS~~The ~~No.~~Company follows SFAS ~~121~~144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” ~~and~~SFAS 144 ~~for~~requires ~~Long~~long-~~Lived~~lived ~~Assets to be~~assets, ~~Disposed~~including Ofinventories,” ~~requires~~that ~~impairment~~are ~~losses~~expected to be ~~recorded~~held onand used in ~~assets~~operations to be ~~held~~carried ~~and~~at ~~used~~the bylower ~~the~~of ~~Company~~cost ~~when~~or, ~~indicators~~if ofimpaired, ~~impairments~~the ~~are~~fair ~~present~~value ~~and~~of the asset. SFAS 144 requires that companies evaluate long-lived assets for impairment based on undiscounted future cash flows of the assets at the lowest level for which ~~estimated~~there tois beidentifiable ~~generated~~cash byflows. ~~those~~This ~~assets~~evaluation ~~are~~requires estimates ~~less~~of ~~than~~future revenues, costs and the remaining time to ~~carrying~~develop ~~amount~~the project and requires a substantial degree of judgment ~~assets~~by management. ~~The~~Actual ~~estimation~~revenues, ~~process~~costs ~~used~~and intime to ~~determining~~complete development could vary from estimates which could affect the ~~undiscounted~~Company’s ~~cash~~future ~~flows~~results of ~~the~~operations. Management ~~assets~~reviews iseach real estate project on a ~~inherently~~community-by-community ~~uncertain~~basis ~~because~~to itdetermine ~~involves~~whether ~~estimates~~or not carrying amounts have been impaired. The adoption of ~~future~~SFAS 144 ~~revenues~~did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.


	*Joint Ventures*

~~and~~Company ~~costs.~~has Asutilized ~~described~~joint ~~more~~ventures ~~fully~~in ~~above,~~order to ~~estimates~~increase the ability of ~~revenues~~the ~~and~~Company ~~costs~~to ~~are~~control ~~supported~~real byproperty ~~the~~and to diversify the Company’s ~~budgeting~~sources ~~process~~of financing. ~~When an impairment loss is~~The ~~required~~Company ~~for~~expects ~~assets~~ to becontinue ~~held~~to ~~and~~utilize ~~used~~joint byventures ~~the~~in ~~Company,~~ the ~~related~~future ~~assets~~on ~~are~~a ~~adjusted~~selective tobasis, ~~their~~taking ~~estimated~~into ~~fair~~account ~~value.~~other available ~~Management~~sources ~~reviews~~of ~~all~~financing, ~~real~~project ~~estate~~risk ~~projects~~and ~~for~~the ~~impairment~~potential onreturn anto ~~ongoing~~the ~~basis~~Company.

~~Fair~~At ~~value represents~~ the ~~amount~~current attime, ~~which~~the anCompany’s typical ~~asset~~investment ~~could~~in bemost ~~bought~~of orits ~~sold~~joint inventures aconsists ~~current~~of ~~transaction between~~a ~~willing~~percentage ~~parties,~~of ~~that~~the ~~is,~~total ~~other~~capital ~~than~~required a(typically ~~forced~~ten percent or ~~liquidation sale.~~less) ~~The~~and ~~estimation~~after ~~process~~substantial ~~involved~~completion inof ~~determining~~the ifproject ~~assets~~and ~~have~~after ~~been~~payment ~~impaired~~of ~~and~~all inproject ~~the~~expenses, ~~determination~~return of ~~fair value is~~invested ~~inherently~~capital ~~uncertain~~together ~~because~~with ita ~~requires~~preferred ~~estimates~~return, ofthe ~~current~~Company ~~market~~participates ~~yields~~in asthe ~~well~~profits asof ~~future~~the ~~events and conditions~~project. ~~Such~~The Company ~~future~~typically ~~events~~does ~~and~~not ~~conditions~~provide ~~include~~any ~~economic~~financial ~~and~~or ~~market~~other credit ~~conditions,~~enhancements asin ~~well~~connection aswith ~~the~~these ~~availability~~joint ofventure ~~suitable financing to~~investments ~~fund~~but ~~development~~sometimes ~~and~~provides ~~construction~~operational ~~activities.~~agreements ~~The~~that ~~realization~~it ofwill ~~the~~complete ~~Company’s~~construction. ~~real~~The ~~estate~~Company ~~projects~~accounts isfor ~~dependent~~these ~~upon future~~joint ~~uncertain~~ventures ~~events~~on ~~and~~the ~~conditions~~equity ~~and,~~method ~~accordingly,~~when the ~~actual~~Company’s ownership ~~timing~~is less than 50 percent, and ~~amounts~~on ~~realized~~a byconsolidated basis when the Company’s ~~may~~ownership beexceeds ~~materially different~~50 percent ~~from~~and ~~their~~when the ~~estimated~~Company ~~fair~~exercises ~~values~~control.

~~Joint~~ The ~~Ventures~~adoption of Financial Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46, which is discussed below, may in the future affect the Company’s accounting for these joint ventures.

The Company has historically entered into joint ventures with financial partners in which the joint venture partner typically provides the majority of the capital and/or financing required for the project. The Company has utilized joint ventures in order to increase the ability of the Company to control real property and to diversify the Company’s sources of financing. The Company expects to continue to utilize joint ventures in the future on a selective basis, taking into account other available sources of financing, project risk and the potential return to the Company.

At the current time, the Company’s typical investment in most of its joint ventures consists of a percentage of the total capital required (typically ten percent or less) and after substantial completion of the project and after payment of all project expenses, return of invested capital together with a preferred return the Company participates in the profits of the project. The Company typically does not provide any financial or other credit enhancements in connection with these joint venture investments but sometimes provides operational agreements that it will complete construction. The Company accounts for these joint ventures on the equity method when the Company’s ownership is less than 50 percent, and on a consolidated basis when the Company’s ownership exceeds 50 percent.


	*Management Fees*

In connection with the joint ventures discussed above, the Company typically charges a management fee to the joint venture, representing reimbursement for overhead expenditures made by the Company on behalf of the joint venture project. These fees are typically either a fixed amount or a variable amount based on a percentage of actual or projected revenue within the joint venture and are collected over the life of the project. This reimbursement is included in the Company’s income statement as an offset to selling, general and administrative expense and is disclosed in Note 1112 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For unconsolidated joint ventures and Managed Projects, such amounts are recognized currently, and for consolidated joint ventures and subsidiaries, a portion of the fee related to homes which have not closed is deferred.


	*Related Party Transactions*

The Company has in place formal systems to identify, track and report related party transactions. The Company feels that all significant related party transactions have been properly accounted for and adequately disclosed. See Item 13 and Note 1112 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Company’s transactions with related parties.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.~~SFAS ~~141~~142, “~~Business~~Goodwill ~~Combinations~~and Other Intangible Assets.” (“SFAS ~~141”).~~ ~~This~~142 ~~Statement~~ addresses financial accounting and reporting for ~~business~~acquired goodwill and other ~~combinations~~intangible assets and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 1617, “~~Business~~Intangible Assets.” ~~Combinations~~This pronouncement addresses,” among other things, how goodwill and ~~FASB~~other ~~Statement~~intangible assets should be accounted for Noafter they have been initially recognized in the financial statements. Goodwill will no longer be amortized but will be assessed at least annually for impairment using a fair value methodology. The Company will adopt this statement for all goodwill and other intangible assets acquired after June 3830, ~~“Accounting~~2001 and for ~~Preacquisition~~all ~~Contingencies~~existing goodwill and other intangible assets beginning March 1, 2002. Upon adoption of this ~~Purchased~~standard on March 1, 2002, the Company was required to accrete the remaining balance of negative goodwill through a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, which increased net income in fiscal 2003 by $5.4 million, or $0.36 per diluted share. Other than the accretion of the remaining negative goodwill, the adoption of SFAS 142 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, which addresses financial reporting requirements for variable interest entities. In general, a variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust, or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (1) does not have equity investors with voting rights; or (2) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities.

~~Enterprises.”~~FIN ~~All~~46 ~~business~~requires ~~combinations~~a ~~in the~~variable ~~scope~~interest ofentity ~~this Statement are~~ to be ~~accounted for using one~~ ~~method,~~consolidated ~~the~~by ~~purchase~~a ~~method.~~company ~~The~~if ~~Company~~that ~~will~~company ~~adopt~~is ~~SFAS~~subject ~~141~~to ~~for~~a ~~any~~majority ~~business~~of ~~combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. Also in June 2001,~~ the ~~FASB~~risk ~~issued Statement~~ of ~~Financial Accounting~~loss ~~Standards~~from ~~No. 142,~~the ~~“Goodwill~~variable ~~and Other~~interest ~~Intangible~~entity’s ~~Assets”~~activities ~~(“SFAS 142”). SFAS 142~~or ~~addresses~~entitled ~~financial~~to ~~accounting~~receive ~~and~~a ~~reporting~~majority ~~for~~of ~~acquired~~the ~~goodwill~~entity’s ~~and~~residual ~~other~~returns ~~intangible~~or ~~assets and supersedes APB Opinion No~~both. FIN ~~17,~~46 ~~“Intangible Assets.” This~~also ~~pronouncement~~requires ~~addresses,~~disclosures ~~among~~about ~~other~~variable ~~things,~~interest ~~how~~entities ~~goodwill~~that ~~and~~the ~~other~~company ~~intangible~~is ~~assets~~not ~~should~~required beto ~~accounted~~consolidate ~~for~~but ~~after they have been initially recognized~~ in ~~the~~which ~~financial~~it ~~statements.~~has ~~Goodwill~~a ~~will~~significant novariable ~~longer be amortized but will be assessed at least annually for impairment using a fair value methodology~~interest. The ~~Company~~ ~~will~~consolidation ~~adopt~~requirements ~~this~~of FIN 46 ~~statement~~apply ~~for~~immediately ~~all~~to ~~goodwill~~variable ~~and~~interest ~~other~~entities ~~intangible~~created ~~assets acquired~~ after ~~June~~January 3031, ~~2001~~2003. ~~and~~The ~~for all~~consolidation ~~existing~~requirements ~~goodwill~~apply ~~and~~to ~~other~~entities ~~intangible~~existing ~~assets~~at ~~beginning March~~January 131, ~~2002. Upon adoption of this standard on~~2003 ~~March 1,~~in ~~2002,~~ the ~~Company~~first isfiscal ~~required~~year toor ~~accrete~~interim ~~the remaining~~period ~~balance~~beginning ofafter June 15, ~~negative~~2003. ~~goodwill~~Certain ~~through a cumulative effect~~ of ~~change~~the indisclosure ~~accounting~~requirements ~~principle, which will increase~~apply ~~net income~~ in ~~fiscal~~all ~~2003~~financial bystatements ~~approximately~~issued ~~$5.4~~after January ~~million~~31, or2003, ~~approximately~~regardless ~~$0.37~~of ~~per~~when ~~diluted~~the ~~share.~~variable ~~Other~~interest ~~than~~entity ~~the~~was ~~accretion~~established. ofThe ~~the~~Company ~~remaining~~is ~~negative~~currently ~~goodwill,~~evaluating ~~the~~its ~~Company~~existing ~~does not~~arrangements ~~anticipate~~and anticipates that the adoption of ~~SFAS~~FIN ~~142~~46 will not have a significant effect on ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~ financial position or results of operations.

In ~~August~~December ~~2001~~2002, the FASB issued ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.~~SFAS ~~144~~148, “Accounting for ~~the Impairment or Disposal of Long~~Stock-~~Lived~~Based ~~Assets” (“SFAS~~Compensation ~~144”). SFAS 144 addresses financial~~— ~~accounting~~Transition and ~~reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets~~Disclosure.” SFAS ~~144~~148 ~~supersedes~~ amends SFAS ~~No.~~ ~~121~~123, ~~which~~ is“Accounting ~~discussed~~for ~~above~~Stock-Based Compensation,” ~~and~~to ~~the~~provide ~~accounting~~three ~~and~~alternative ~~reporting provisions~~methods of ~~APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the~~ ~~Results~~transition ofto ~~Operations~~SFAS —123’s ~~Reporting~~fair ~~the~~value ~~Effects~~method of ~~Disposal~~accounting offor astock-based ~~Segment~~employee ofcompensation afor ~~Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual~~companies ~~and~~that ~~Infrequently~~elect ~~Occurring~~to ~~Events~~adopt ~~and Transactions,” for~~ the ~~disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion). The~~ provisions of SFAS ~~144~~123. ~~are effective~~Transition ~~for~~to ~~financial~~SFAS 123 ~~statements~~is ~~issued~~not ~~for~~required ~~fiscal~~by ~~years beginning after December~~SFAS ~~15,~~148. ~~2001,~~The ~~with early application encouraged and~~Company ~~generally~~has ~~are~~elected to beuse ~~applied~~the ~~prospectively.~~intrinsic ~~The~~value ~~Company~~method ~~does not expect the adoption~~ of ~~SFAS 144~~accounting tofor stock ~~have~~compensation ain ~~material~~accordance ~~impact~~with APB 25, on“Accounting ~~the~~for ~~Company’s~~Stock ~~financial~~Issued ~~position~~to orEmployees” ~~results~~and ofrelated ~~operations~~interpretations.

~~Item~~SFAS ~~7A. Quantitative~~148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and ~~Qualitative~~APB 28, ~~Disclosures~~“Interim Financial ~~about~~Reporting,” ~~Market~~to ~~Risk~~require disclosure in the summary of significant accounting policies of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock based compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. The disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 are required to be adopted by all companies with stock-based employee compensation, regardless of whether they account for that compensation using the fair value method of SFAS 123 or the intrinsic value method of APB 25. The disclosure provisions of SFAS 148, effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, have been adopted by the Company, with the appropriate disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~November is2002, ~~exposed~~the toFASB ~~market~~issued ~~risks~~FIN ~~related~~45, towhich ~~fluctuations~~elaborates inon ~~interest~~the ~~rates~~existing ondisclosure ~~its~~requirements ~~debt~~for most guarantees, including loan guarantees. ~~Under~~It ~~the~~also ~~new~~clarifies ~~credit~~that at ~~facility~~the time a company issues a guarantee, the ~~Company~~company ~~utilized~~must recognize ~~interest~~an ~~rate~~initial ~~swaps~~liability infor ~~order~~the tofair value, or market ~~fix~~value, of the ~~interest~~obligations ~~rate~~it onassumes ~~$75 million~~under ofthat guarantee and must disclose that information in its ~~variable~~interim ~~rate~~and annual ~~debt~~financial statements. ~~The~~FIN ~~Company~~45 ~~has~~does not ~~used~~apply ~~forward~~to orcertain ~~option~~ guarantee contracts, ~~on foreign~~such ~~currencies~~as orthose ~~commodities,~~issued orby ~~other~~insurance ~~types~~companies ofor ~~derivative~~for a ~~financial~~lessee’s ~~instruments.~~residual ~~The~~value ~~purpose~~guarantee ofembedded ~~the~~in ~~following~~a ~~analysis is~~capital lease. The provisions related to ~~provide~~recognizing a ~~framework~~liability toat inception ~~understand~~of the ~~Company~~guarantee for the fair value of the guarantor’s ~~sensitivity~~ obligations would not apply to ~~hypothetical~~product warranties ~~changes~~or into ~~interest~~guarantees ~~rates~~accounted for as ofderivatives. The ~~February~~initial recognition and initial measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 2831, 2002., ~~Many~~regardless of the ~~statements~~guarantor’s fiscal ~~contained~~year-end. The disclosure requirements in ~~this section~~FIN 45 are effective ~~forward~~for ~~looking~~financial ~~and~~statements ~~should~~of beinterim ~~read~~or inannual ~~conjunction~~periods ~~with~~ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s ~~disclosures~~financial position ~~under~~or ~~the~~results ~~heading “Forward-Looking~~of ~~Statements~~operations.”

~~The~~In ~~Company~~April ~~uses~~2002, ~~debt~~the ~~financing~~FASB ~~primarily~~issued ~~for the~~SFAS 145, ~~purpose~~“Rescission of ~~acquiring~~SFAS ~~and~~No. 4, ~~developing~~44, ~~land~~64 and ~~constructing~~Amendment ~~and~~of ~~selling~~SFAS ~~homes~~No. 13 ~~Historically,~~and ~~the~~Technical ~~Company~~Corrections.” ~~has~~SFAS 145 prevents ~~made~~treatment ~~short-term~~as extraordinary any gains or losses ~~borrowings~~recognized ~~under~~on ~~its~~extinguishment ~~revolving~~of ~~credit~~debt ~~facilities~~not tomeeting ~~fund~~the ~~these~~criteria of ~~expenditures~~APB 30. InSFAS 145 ~~addition,~~is ~~the~~effective ~~Company~~for ~~has~~fiscal ~~previously issued~~years ~~$100 million~~beginning inafter ~~fixed~~May 15, ~~rate~~2002. ~~debt~~The toadoption ~~provide~~of ~~longer-term~~SFAS 145 ~~financing.~~will ~~During~~affect ~~fiscal~~the ~~2002,~~classification ~~the~~of ~~Company~~such ~~repurchased~~amounts in the financial ~~remaining~~statements ~~balance~~ of ~~Senior~~subsequent ~~Notes~~periods and comparative prior periods.

~~For~~Item ~~fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value of the debt instrument, but not the Company’s earnings or cash flows~~7A. ~~Conversely, for~~Quantitative ~~variable rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do not impact fair market value of the debt instrument, but do affect the Company’s future earnings~~ and ~~cash~~Qualitative ~~flows.~~Disclosures ~~The Company~~about ~~does~~Market not have an obligation to prepay fixed rate debt prior to maturity, and as a result, interest rate risk and changes in fair market value should not have a significant impact on such debt until the Company would be required to refinance such debt. Based on the amount of variable rate debt outstanding at February 28, 2002, and holding the variable rate debt balance constant, each one-percentage point increase in interest rates would result in an increase in interest incurred for the coming year of approximately $300,000, including the impact of the interest rate swaps and discussed above. Risk

The ~~table~~Company ~~below~~is ~~details~~exposed ~~the~~to ~~principal~~market ~~amount~~risks ~~and~~related to ~~the~~fluctuations ~~average~~in interest rates ~~for~~on its debt. ~~for~~Under ~~each~~the ~~category~~Senior Facility ~~based~~and ~~upon~~the Senior Subordinated Credit Agreement, the Company has utilized interest rate swaps in order to fix the interest ~~expected~~rate ~~maturity~~on ~~dates~~$95 million of its variable rate debt. The Company ~~carrying~~has ~~value~~not used forward or option contracts on foreign currencies or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments. The purpose of the following analysis is ~~Company’s~~to ~~variable~~provide ~~rate~~a ~~debt~~framework ~~approximates~~to understand the Company’s sensitivity to

~~fair~~hypothetical ~~value~~changes ~~due~~in tointerest ~~the~~rates ~~frequency~~as of February 28, ~~repricing~~2003. Many of the statements contained in this section ~~debt.~~are ~~The~~forward ~~Company’s~~looking ~~fixed~~and ~~rate~~should ~~debt~~be ~~consists~~read ofin conjunction ~~various~~with ~~purchase~~the ~~money~~Company’s ~~trust~~disclosures ~~deed~~under ~~notes~~the ~~and~~heading “Forward-Looking ~~other notes~~Statements.”

		Expected Maturity Date
		Year Ending February 28,
											Fair
		2003			2004			Total			Value
		(Dollars in thousands)
Liabilities:
Fixed rate debt		$	7,596		$	—		$	7,596		$	7,677
	Average interest rate		13.34	%		—			13.34	%
Variable rate debt		$	12,218		$	96,451		$	108,669		$	108,669
	Average interest rate		5.26	%		4.21	%		4.33	%

The Company uses debt financing primarily for the purpose of acquiring and developing land and constructing and selling homes. Historically, the Company has made short-term borrowings under its revolving credit facilities to fund these expenditures. In addition, the Company has previously issued $100 million in fixed rate 12 3/4% Senior Notes to provide longer-term financing. During fiscal 2002, the Company repurchased the remaining balance of Senior Notes.

~~The~~For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value of the debt instrument, but not the Company’s ~~does~~earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt, changes in interest rates generally do not ~~believe~~impact ~~that~~fair market value of the debt instrument, but do affect the Company’s future earnings and cash flows. The ~~market~~Company ~~rate~~does ~~risks~~not ~~related~~have an obligation to ~~the~~prepay ~~above~~fixed ~~securities~~rate ~~will~~debt prior ~~have~~to maturity, and as a result, interest rate risk and ~~material~~changes ~~adverse~~in fair market value should not have a significant impact on such debt until the Company’s ~~financial~~would be required to ~~position~~refinance such debt. Based on the amount of variable rate debt outstanding at February 28, ~~results~~2003, and holding the variable rate debt balance constant, each one-percentage point increase in interest rates would result in an increase in interest incurred for the coming year of ~~operations~~approximately or$300,000, including ~~liquidity~~the impact of the interest rate swaps discussed above.

23 The table below details the principal amount and the average interest rates for debt for each category based upon the expected maturity dates. The carrying value of the Company’s variable rate debt approximates fair value due to the frequency of repricing of this debt. The Company’s fixed rate debt consists of various purchase money trust deed notes and other notes.



		Expected Maturity Date


		Year Ending


					February 28,
		February 29,												February 29,
		2004			2005			2006			2007			2008			Total			Fair Value

Liabilities:
Fixed rate debt		$	1,443		$	42		$	968		$	—		$	—		$	2,453		$	2,453
	Average interest rate		5.26	%		7.86	%		7.98	%		—			—			6.18	%
Variable rate debt		$	2,227		$	372		$	98,070		$	496		$	22,945		$	124,110		$	124,110
	Average interest rate		4.58	%		5.04	%		3.87	%		5.04	%		6.18	%		4.32	%

The Company does not believe that the future market rate risks related to the above securities will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

	Page
Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc.
Report of Independent Auditors		25
Report of Independent Public Accountants		26
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 28, 2001 and 2002		27
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 28, 2002 and 2003		27
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001 and 2002		28
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003		28
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001 and 2002		29
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003		29
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001 and 2002		30
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003		30
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		32
Grand Coto Estates, L.P.
Report of Independent Auditors		49
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited)		50
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited)		51
Statements of Partners’ Capital (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited)		52
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited)		53
Notes to Financial Statements		54
M.P.E. Partners, L.P.
Report of Independent Auditors		56
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited)		57
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited)		58
Statements of Partners’ Capital (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited)		59
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited)		60
Notes to Financial Statements		61

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. and ~~subsidiaries~~ subsidiaries as of February 28, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the ~~year~~years ~~ended~~then ~~February 28, 2002~~ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The consolidated financial statements of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended February 28, 2001 were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. These auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on these consolidated financial statements in their report dated May 16, 2001.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, ~~based on our audits,~~ the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the ~~year~~years then ended ~~February 28~~, ~~2002,~~ in conformity with accounting ~~principles~~ principles generally accepted in the United States.

~~ERNST~~ As &discussed ~~YOUNG~~in ~~LLP~~Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on March 1, 2003 the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which increased earnings for the year ended February 28, 2003 as compared to the years ended February 28, 2002 and 2001.


	/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Irvine, California

May 152, ~~2002~~2003

The following audit report of Arthur Andersen LLP is a copy of the original report dated May 16, 2001 rendered by Arthur Andersen LLP on our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2001, and has not been reissued by Arthur Andersen LLP since May 28, 2002. We are including this copy of the Arthur Andersen LLP audit report pursuant to Rule 2-02(e) of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933. The Arthur Andersen LLP audit report refers to the consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. for the year ended February 28, 2001.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated ~~balance~~statements ~~sheet~~of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) ~~and subsidiaries as of February 28, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows~~ for ~~the two years in~~ the ~~period~~year ended February 28, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. ~~We did not audit the~~ ~~financial statements of certain Joint Ventures for the year~~ ~~ended February 29, 2000 (Notes 1 and 4), the~~ investments in which are reflected in the accompanying financial statements using the equity method of accounting. The equity in the net income of these Joint Ventures was $1,197,000 for the year ended February 29, 2000. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for those entities, is based on the report of the other auditors.

We conducted our ~~audits~~audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our ~~audits and the report of other auditors~~audit, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the ~~financial position~~results of ~~Capital~~operations and cash flows of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries ~~as of February 28, 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows~~ for the ~~two~~year ~~years in the period~~ ended February 28, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Orange County, California

May 16, 2001

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

			February 28,			February 28,
			2001			2002
			2002			2003
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents			$	75,~~552~~080		$	56,~~080~~231
Restricted cash				~~781~~365			~~365~~495
Accounts and notes receivable				25,082			14,537
Accounts and notes receivable (Note 12)				14,537			16,192
Real estate projects				~~259~~203,~~873~~685			~~203~~184,~~685~~891
Property and equipment				—971			~~971~~7,679
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures				58,~~273~~549			814,~~549~~303
Prepaid expenses and other assets				1013,~~851~~342			1721,~~008~~956
	Total assets	~~Total assets~~	$	~~309~~246,~~412~~529		$	~~250~~251,~~195~~747
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			$	4631,~~684~~703		$	3520,~~369~~141
Notes payable				~~110~~116,~~223~~265			~~116~~126,~~265~~563
Senior unsecured notes payable				55,592			—
	Total liabilities			147,968			146,704
		Total liabilities		212,499			151,634
Negative goodwill				5,447			—
Negative goodwill				6,390			5,447
Minority interest				—			4,644
Minority interest				7,743			—
Stockholders’ equity:
	Common stock, par value $0.10 per share; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 16,230,000 shares issued; 13,767,311 and 14,878,711 shares outstanding, respectively			1,500			1,623
	Common stock, par value $0.10 per share; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 16,230,000 shares issued; 14,878,711 and 14,914,362 shares outstanding, respectively			1,623			1,635
	Additional paid-in capital			~~211~~216,~~888~~853			~~216~~217,~~853~~249
	Accumulated deficit			(~~127~~120,~~054~~762	)		(~~120~~111,~~762~~098	)
	Treasury stock			(34,~~554~~080	)		(4,~~080~~875	)
	Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			—(520	)		(~~520~~2,512	)
		Total stockholders’ equity		8293,~~780~~114			93100,~~114~~399
		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	~~309~~246,~~412~~529		$	~~250~~251,~~195~~747

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

		For the Years Ended
		February 29,			February 28,			February 28,
		February 28,			February 28,			February 28,
		2000			2001			2002
		2001			2002			2003
Sales of homes and land		$	290,791		$	363,743		$	298,701
Sales of homes and land (Note 12)		$	363,743		$	298,701		$	247,121
Cost of sales			~~231~~(272,~~273~~332	)		~~272~~(226,~~332~~373	)		~~226~~(195,~~373~~252	)
	Gross margin		59,518			91,411			72,328
Interest expense			(35,707	)		(28,932	)		(14,533	)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures			1,730			(874	)		746
Selling, general and administrative expenses			(38,615	)		(36,301	)		(34,536	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses			(30,813	)		(38,615	)		(36,301	)
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures			(874	)		746			1,748
Interest expense			(22,141	)		(35,707	)		(28,932	)
Interest and other income, net			1,927			1,367			1,155
Interest and other income, net			1,513			1,927			1,367
	Income from operations		18,142			9,208			5,703
	Income from operations		9,807			18,142			9,208
Minority interest			(5,628	)		(159	)		—
Minority interest			(2,835	)		(5,628	)		(159	)
	Income before provision for income taxes, extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		12,514			9,049			5,703
	Income before provision for income taxes and extraordinary item		6,972			12,514			9,049
Provision for income taxes			(1,786	)		(2,757	)		(1,486	)
Provision for income taxes			1,745			1,786			2,757
	Income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		10,728			6,292			4,217
	Income before extraordinary item		5,227			10,728			6,292
Extraordinary item — gain on debt retired at less than face value, net of minority interest and taxes			1,461			—			—
Extraordinary item — gain on debt retired at less than face value, net of minority interest and taxes			955			1,461			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle — negative goodwill, net of tax effect			—			—			5,447
	Net income	$	612,~~182~~189		$	126,~~189~~292		$	69,~~292~~664
Earnings per common share — basic and diluted:
	Income before extraordinary item	$	0.37		$	0.77		$	0.43
	Income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.77		$	0.43		$	0.28
	Extraordinary item		0.0711			~~0.11~~—			—
	Net income	$	0.44		$	0.88		$	0.43
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			0.36
	Weighted average common shares — basic		13,923			13,773			14,620
	Net income	$	0.88		$	0.43		$	0.64
	Weighted average common shares — diluted		14,014			13,896			14,795
Weighted average common shares — basic			13,773			14,620			14,906
Weighted average common shares — diluted			13,896			14,795			14,958

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Three Years Ended February 28, ~~2002~~2003

(In thousands, except shares)

																Accumulated
			Common Stock					Additional								Other
																Other
								Paid-In		Accumulated			Treasury			Comprehensive
			Common Stock					Additional								Comprehensive
			Shares			Amount		Capital		Deficit			Stock			Income (Loss)			Total
								Paid-In		Accumulated			Treasury			Income
Balance, February 28, 1999				14,027,911		$	1,500	$	211,888	$	(145,425	)	$	(2,609	)	$	—		$	65,354
			Shares			Amount		Capital		Deficit			Stock			(Loss)			Total
	Repurchase of common stock			(212,000	)		—		—		—			(650	)		—			(650	)
Balance, February 29, 2000				13,815,911		$	1,500	$	211,888	$	(139,243	)	$	(3,259	)	$	—		$	70,886
	Net income			—			—		—		6,182			—			—			6,182
Balance, February 29, 2000				13,815,911			1,500		211,888		(139,243	)		(3,259	)		—			70,886
	Repurchase of common stock and warrants			(48,600	)		—		—		—			(295	)		—			(295	)
	Net income			—			—		—		12,189			—			—			12,189
Balance, February 28, 2001				13,767,311			1,500		211,888		(127,054	)		(3,554	)		—			82,780
	Issuance of non-voting common stock			1,235,000			123		4,965		—			—			—			5,088
	Repurchase of common stock and warrants			(123,600	)		—		—		—			(526	)		—			(526	)
	Net income			—			—		—		6,292			—			—			6,292
	Other comprehensive income (loss):
		Interest rate swap		—			—		—		—			—			(520	)		(520	)
Balance, February 28, 2002				14,878,711		$	1,623	$	216,853	$	(120,762	)	$	(4,080	)	$	(520	)	$	93,114
	Issuance of common stock upon warrant conversion			123,951			12		396		—			—			—			408
	Repurchase of common stock and warrants			(88,300	)		—		—		—			(795	)		—			(795	)
	Net income			—			—		—		9,664			—			—			9,664
	Other comprehensive income (loss):
		Interest rate swap		—			—		—		—			—			(1,992	)		(1,992	)
Balance, February 28, 2003				14,914,362		$	1,635	$	217,249	$	(111,098	)	$	(4,875	)	$	(2,512	)	$	100,399

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

					For the Years Ended
					February 29,			February 28,			February 28,
					February 28,			February 28,			February 28,
					2000			2001			2002
					2001			2002			2003
Operating Activities:
	Net income				$	612,~~182~~189		$	126,~~189~~292		$	69,~~292~~664
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
		Gain on retirement of senior unsecured notes payable				(~~955~~1,461	)		~~(1,461~~—	)		—
		Gain on sale of building				—(1,040	)		~~(1,040~~—	)		—
		Depreciation and amortization				1,897			1,458			138
		(Income) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures, including interest expense				874			(746	)		(1,748	)
		Accretion of deferred gain				—			—			(707	)
		Minority interest				5,628			159			—
		Accretion of negative goodwill				—			—			(1,336	)
		Depreciation and amortization				1,458			138			295
		Accretion of deferred gain				—			(707	)		(1,979	)
		Accretion of negative goodwill, including cumulative effect of change in accounting principle				—			(1,336	)		(5,447	)
		Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
			(Increase) decrease in accounts and notes receivable			(102,~~329~~301	)		(210,~~301~~545	)		10(1,~~545~~655	)
			(Increase) decrease in real estate projects			(21,164	)		18,695			56,188
			Decrease in real estate projects			18,695			56,188			18,794
			(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets			2,020			(2,689	)		(5,741	)
			Increase in restricted cash, prepaid expenses and other assets			(2,689	)		(2,075	)		(7,069	)
			Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities			1,394			(1,517	)		(13,189	)
			Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities			(1,517	)		(16,855	)		(13,250	)
		(Income) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures, including interest expense				(1,211	)		874			(746	)
				Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		29,836			51,603			(2,395	)
		Minority interest				3,424			5,628			159
				Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(18,742	)		29,836			51,603
Investing Activities:
	Proceeds from sale of building					—3,500			~~3,500~~—			—
	Purchases of property and equipment					(1,039	)		(1,410	)		(1,469	)
	Purchases of property and equipment, net					(1,410	)		(1,469	)		(7,003	)
	Cash distributed with Divested Joint Ventures					—(3,983	)		~~(3,983~~—	)		—
	Decrease (increase) in investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures					95,~~133~~162			5(2,~~162~~530	)		(24,~~530~~006	)
				Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		83,~~094~~269			(3,~~269~~999	)		(311,~~999~~009	)
Financing Activities:
	Proceeds from notes payable					~~306~~417,~~169~~072			~~417~~495,~~072~~507			~~495~~253,~~507~~023
	Principal payments of notes payable					(~~271~~431,~~849~~409	)		(~~431~~489,~~409~~465	)		(~~489~~242,~~465~~725	)
	Capital contributions (distributions) to minority interest, net					~~106~~(660	)		~~(660~~—	)		—4,644
	Retirement of senior unsecured notes payable					(929,~~521~~650	)		(2955,~~650~~592	)		~~(55,592~~—	)
	Repurchase of common stock and warrants					(650	)		(295	)		(526	)
	Issuance of common stock upon warrant conversion					—			—			408
				Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		24,255			(44,942	)		(50,076	)
	Repurchase of common stock and warrants					(295	)		(526	)		(795	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents						13,607			(11,837	)		(2,472	)
				Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(44,942	)		(50,076	)		14,555
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year						5,782			19,389			7,552
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents						(11,837	)		(2,472	)		1,151
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year					$	19,389		$	7,552		$	5,080
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year						19,389			7,552			5,080
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year					$	7,552		$	5,080		$	6,231
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash and Non-Cash Activities:
	Cash paid during the year for interest, all capitalized to real estate projects				$	2527,~~450~~614		$	2714,~~614~~798		$	1410,~~798~~310
	Cash paid during the year for income taxes				$	—1,771		$	16,~~771~~491		$	6,~~491~~298

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — (Continued)

Non-Cash Activities:

During fiscal 2001, the Company consummated an Exchange Transaction with CHF (see Note 1) which was an entirely non-cash transaction, other than the distribution to the Company of cash balances held by the Divested Joint Ventures. The transaction resulted in the elimination of a substantial portion of the Company’s minority interest and certain other accounts as summarized below:

Assets and liabilities held by Divested Joint Ventures exchanged by the Company:


	Cash		$	(3,983	)
	Accounts receivable			(81	)
	Real estate projects			(3,929	)
	Property and equipment			(3,038	)
	Prepaid expenses and other assets			(213	)
	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			103
	Notes payable			1,249

			$	(9,892	)

Summary of amounts recorded as a result of the Exchange Transaction:
	Minority interest acquired		$	31,685
	Assets exchanged:
		Divested Joint Ventures		(9,892	)
		Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		(4,070	)

				17,723
	Deferred income taxes and accrued expenses recorded			(4,805	)
	Adjustment of remaining property and equipment to zero			(2,994	)
	Deferred gain recorded			(3,534	)
	Negative goodwill recorded			(6,390	)

			$	—

During fiscal 2002, the Company issued 1,235,000 shares of non-voting common stock to CHF in return for CHF’s remaining 7% interest in CPH LLC in connection with the Exchange Transaction described in Note 1 to the financial statements. As a result CPH, Inc. owned 100% of CPH LLC. Below is a summary of amounts recorded as a result of this transaction:


Minority interest acquired	$	7,902
Issuance of non-voting common stock		(5,088	)
Deferred income taxes and accrued expenses recorded		(2,061	)
Adjustment of remaining property and equipment to zero		(360	)
Negative goodwill recorded		(393	)

	$	—

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.	Company Organization, Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


	*Company Organization and Operations*

Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. (“CPH, Inc.”), together with its subsidiaries, (the “Company”) conducts business principally under the ~~names~~name Capital Pacific Homes ~~and, in Texas, Clark Wilson Homes~~.

In fiscal year 1998, CPH, Inc. consummated an equity and restructuring transaction whereby CPH, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries transferred to a newly formed entity, Capital Pacific Holdings, LLC (“CPH LLC”), substantially all of their respective assets and CPH LLC assumed all the liabilities of CPH, Inc. and its subsidiaries. An unaffiliated investment company, California Housing Finance, L.P. (“CHF”) then acquired a 32.07% minority interest in CPH LLC as a result of a cash investment ~~of $30 million~~ in CPH LLC. From ~~fiscal~~ fiscal 1998 through fiscal 2001, CPH, Inc. expanded its ~~operating~~ operating strategy to encompass the acquisition and development of of commercial and mixed-use projects, as well as ownership of existing commercial properties, primarily through ~~0.7% capital~~non-majority investments in limited liability companies, with ~~approximately~~ 99.25% of the capital for these projects being provided by CHF. CPH, Inc. and CHF had contingent profits interests (after repayment of debt, the costs of the project, invested capital and preferred return, the latter typically 12%) of approximately 30% to CPH, Inc. and 70% to CHF.

Effective February 23, 2001, CPH, Inc. and CHF consummated the first portion of an interest exchange transaction (the “Exchange Transaction”), whereby CPH, Inc. exchanged its 0.775% capital interests and contingent profit interest in the majority of the joint ventures capitalized by CHF, including certain entities which were previously consolidated, (the “Divested Joint Ventures”), for approximately 78% of CHF’s interest in CPH LLC and all of CHF’s interests in certain residential joint ventures. At February 28, 2001 and during the three month period ended May 31, 2001, CPH, Inc. had a 93% interest in CPH LLC (as compared to 67.03% formerly), ~~which had at February 28, 2001 total capital of $109.5 million,~~ and CHF held a 7% minority interest (as compared to 32.07% formerly). As a result of the first ~~portion~~ portion of the Exchange Transaction, CPH Inc.’s interest in the total capital of CPH LLC increased by 37% ~~equal to~~or $27.72 million. Both CPH, Inc. and CHF ~~both~~ had an option to convert CHF’s remaining 7% interest in CPH LLC into 1,235,000 shares of non-voting Common Stock of CPH, Inc. at ~~the~~ the equivalent of approximately $6.40 per share. This option was exercised by CPH, Inc. on May 31, 2001, ~~thus,~~and as ofa ~~this~~result of ~~date~~this second portion of the Exchange Transaction, CPH, Inc. owned 100% of CPH, LLC, and had obtained an additional increment of CPH LLC’s total capital of $7.9 million. In addition, Capital Pacific Homes, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CPH, Inc., has entered into construction, management and marketing agreements relating to certain of the Divested Joint Ventures with residential components, (the “Managed Projects”), whereby ~~CPH, Inc.~~the Company is compensated for performing such services through a management fee arrangement, including reimbursement of ~~all~~ all project costs. As a result of the Exchange Transaction, ~~CPH,~~the ~~Inc.~~Company has no further exposure to the economic or entitlement risks associated with the Divested Joint Ventures ~~and~~or the ~~Managed~~ Managed Projects, including no obligation to provide any capital.

The Exchange Transaction was accounted for as the simultaneous acquisition of CHF’s minority interest in CPH LLC and certain other residential joint ventures and the disposition of the Company’s interest in the Divested Joint Ventures. ~~All~~As a result, no gain was initially recognized, the remaining balance of the ~~investments~~Company’s ~~received~~property ~~were~~and ~~investments~~equipment was inadjusted to zero at February 28, 2001, and again at ~~real~~May 31, ~~estate~~2001, ~~housing~~a ~~developments~~deferred gain of approximately $3.5 million Awas ~~substantial~~recorded ~~portion~~on the disposition of one of the ~~investments~~Divested ~~conveyed~~Joint ~~represented~~Ventures ~~investments~~due into ~~similar~~continuing ~~real estate.~~involvement ~~For~~in ~~these~~the form ~~exchanges~~ of ~~real~~both ~~estate~~consulting ~~assets~~and ~~for~~lease ~~real~~arrangements between the ~~estate~~Company ~~assets~~and this Divested Joint Venture, and the ~~Company~~balance ~~recorded~~of ~~such~~the transaction ~~amounts~~was ~~based~~recorded ~~upon their~~as ~~historical~~negative ~~cost~~goodwill in ~~accordance~~the ~~with~~amount ~~EITF 98-8 and~~of ~~APB~~$6.8 29million. ~~The~~Negative ~~remaining~~goodwill ~~investments~~represents ~~conveyed~~the ~~were~~portion ~~investments~~of the positive difference between the Company’s basis in ~~various~~the assets ~~types~~acquired ofin ~~real~~the ~~estate~~Exchange ~~developments,~~Transaction as compared to the assets which were ~~intended~~ todivested bewhich ~~held~~was not otherwise accounted for as ~~operation,~~an adjustment to property and ~~thus~~equipment ~~required~~or ~~fair~~as ~~value~~a deferred ~~accounting~~gain. ~~Only~~Both ~~one~~negative ofgoodwill ~~these~~and ~~entities~~the ~~(CPH~~deferred ~~Office~~gain ~~building)~~were ~~had~~being aaccreted ~~fair~~over ~~value~~five ~~that~~years, which accretion was ~~measurably~~included ~~different~~as ~~from~~a reduction ~~its~~in ~~historical~~selling, general and administrative expenses. As ~~cost~~further ~~that~~discussed ~~resulted~~below, indue to a ~~gain,~~recently ~~which~~promulgated ~~has~~change ~~been~~in accounting ~~deferred~~principles, ~~as discussed~~the ~~below~~remaining $5.4 million in unaccreted negative goodwill as of

The Company performed a preliminary allocation of the fair value of CPH LLC as of the consummation date in accordance with APB 16. As such, the acquired assets and assumed liabilities were allocated a portion

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

ofFebruary 28, ~~the~~2002 ~~purchase~~increased ~~price~~net ~~(which~~income ~~was~~in fiscal ~~determined~~2003 tothrough ~~be the~~a ~~historical~~cumulative ~~cost~~effect of ~~the~~change ~~assets~~in ~~conveyed by the Company) equal~~accounting ~~to their estimated fair values, which approximated historical cost~~principle. AsThe aremaining ~~result,~~deferred no gain was ~~initially~~being ~~recognized,~~accreted ~~the~~over ~~remaining balance of~~ the ~~Company’s~~four ~~property~~years ~~and equipment was adjusted to zero at February 28, 2001, and again at May 31, 2001, and the balance~~ of ~~the~~its ~~transaction~~remaining ~~was recorded~~expected ~~initially as negative goodwill~~life. ~~During fiscal 2002~~However, ~~the~~in ~~Company~~Fiscal ~~finalized its purchase price allocation with respect to the Exchange Transaction~~2003, ~~whereby approximately $3.5 million of~~ the ~~amount~~Company ~~previously~~terminated ~~assigned to negative goodwill was assigned to~~ a ~~gain~~portion ~~on the disposition~~ of ~~one~~its oflease ~~the~~from ~~Divested Joint Ventures. Due to continuing involvement in~~ the ~~form~~ ~~of both consulting and lease arrangements between the Company and this~~ Divested Joint Venture, ~~this~~noted ~~gain~~above ~~is being deferred~~ and ~~amortized~~did ~~over~~not ~~its~~renew ~~expected life of five years. The Company’s consolidated balance sheet at February 28, 2001 reflects~~ a ~~reclassification of this deferred gain which is~~ ~~included~~consulting inagreement ~~accounts~~covering ~~payable~~all ~~and accrued liabilities. Negative goodwill in the amount~~ of ~~$6.8 million represents a portion of~~ the ~~positive~~Divested ~~difference between the Company’s basis in~~Joint ~~the~~Ventures, ~~assets~~thus ~~acquired~~eliminating inits ~~the~~continuing ~~Exchange~~involvement ~~Transaction~~on ~~as compared to~~a ~~the~~portion ~~assets~~of ~~which were divested. Both negative goodwill and~~ the deferred gain ~~are~~resulting ~~being accreted over five years, which accretion is included as a reduction~~ in ~~selling,~~an ~~general~~acceleration ~~and administrative expenses. As further discussed below, due to a recently promulgated change in accounting principles, the remaining $5.4 million in unaccreted negative goodwill as~~ of ~~February 28, 2002 will increase net income in~~ the ~~first~~ ~~quarter~~accretion of ~~fiscal 2003 through a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. The remaining $2.8 million of~~ the deferred gain ~~will~~in ~~continue to be accreted over~~ the ~~four~~amount ~~years~~ of ~~its remaining expected life. The positive difference in book~~ ~~value immediately prior to the transaction between the ownership interests received by CPH, Inc. and the interests given by CPH, Inc. totaled~~ $201.53 million.

Assets under management, including assets owned by unconsolidated joint ventures and Managed Projects, totaled $~~475~~513 million at February 28, ~~2002~~2003 in 5065 residential projects. At February 28, ~~2002~~2003, CPH LLC, which is now 100% owned by the Company, had $~~212~~238 million in assets and a net worth of $~~109.5~~107 million. The Company and its subsidiaries perform their respective management functions for CPH LLC and the Managed Projects pursuant to management agreements, which include provisions for the reimbursement of Company and subsidiary costs and a management fee. CPH LLC, the Managed Projects and certain other project-specific entities indemnify CPH, Inc. and its subsidiaries against liabilities arising from the projects owned by such entities. The Company maintains certain licenses and other assets as is necessary to fulfill its obligations as managing member and under management agreements.

References to the Company are, unless the context indicates otherwise, also references to CPH LLC and the ~~joint~~ ~~venture~~project-specific entities ~~and~~in ~~its~~which ~~other~~the ~~subsidiaries~~Company has an equity ownership interest. At the current time, all material financing transactions and arrangements are incurred either by CPH LLC or by the project-specific entities.

The Company is a regional builder and developer with operations throughout selected metropolitan areas of California, Texas, Arizona and Colorado ~~and, until recently, Nevada~~. The Company’s principal business activities are to build and sell single-family homes. The Company’s single-family homes are targeted to entry-level, move-up and luxury buyers.

Approximately 4355, 2721, 11, 13 and 613 percent of of the Company’s total revenues derived from the sale of ~~homes~~ homes and lots were in California, Texas, Arizona, ~~Colorado~~ and ~~Nevada,~~ Colorado, respectively, for the year ended February 28, ~~2002~~2003.

The Company’s business, and the markets which it serves in California, Texas, Arizona and Colorado are affected by local, national and world economic conditions and events, in particular by the level of mortgage interest rates, consumer confidence and real estate prices. The Company cannot predict whether mortgage interest rates will be at levels attractive to prospective homebuyers. If interest rates increase, in particular mortgage interest rates, the Company’s operating results could be adversely impacted.


	*Accounting Estimates*

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingencies at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Significant estimates include projected revenues and costs of projects, which impact the allocation of costs to homes sold. Actual results could differ from estimated amounts.


	*Principles of Consolidation and Minority Interest in Joint Ventures*

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and wholly-owned subsidiaries and certain majority-owned joint ventures, as well as the accounts of CPH LLC. All other investments (See Note 4) are accounted for under the equity method. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Accounting Estimates

Principles of Consolidation and Minority Interest in Joint Ventures

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and wholly-owned subsidiaries and certain majority-owned joint ventures, as well as the accounts of CPH LLC, including the capital accounts of CPH LLC, which as of May 31, 2001 is 100% owned by the Company, totaling $110 million at February 28, 2002. All other investments (See Note 4) are accounted for under the equity method. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


	*Property and Equipment*

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives of three to thirty years using the straight-line method. During fiscal 2001, a building with a book value of $2,460,000 was sold, resulting in a gain of $1,040,000. In addition, a building with a book value of $3,038,000 was exchanged as part of the Exchange Transaction. As a result of the Exchange Transaction, the remaining balance of $2,994,000 in property and equipment was adjusted to zero at February 28, 2001 and again at May 31, 2001 in the amount $360,000. During fiscal 2003, the Company acquired an airplane for a purchase price of $6,337,000, which is being depreciated over its estimated useful life of 15 years.

Real Estate Projects

All direct and indirect land costs, offsite and onsite improvements and applicable interest and carrying charges are capitalized to real estate projects under development. Capitalized costs are expensed as real estate is sold; direct marketing costs are expensed in the period incurred. Land and land development costs are accumulated by project and are allocated to individual phases using the relative sales value method.

The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. ~~121~~144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived ~~Assets and for~~ ~~Long-Lives~~ Assets ~~to Be Disposed Of~~.” SFAS ~~No.~~ ~~121~~ 144 requires long-lived assets, including inventories, that are expected to be held and used in in operations ~~are~~ to be carried at the lower of cost or, if impaired, the fair value of the asset,. ~~rather~~SFAS 144 ~~than~~requires ~~the net~~that ~~realizable~~companies ~~value.~~evaluate ~~Long~~long-lived assets tofor beimpairment ~~disposed~~based ~~of should be~~on ~~reported~~undiscounted atfuture ~~the~~cash ~~lower~~flows of ~~carrying~~the ~~amount~~assets orat ~~fair~~the ~~value~~lowest ~~less cost~~level tofor ~~sell.~~which ~~For~~there ~~purposes~~is ofidentifiable ~~applying~~cash ~~SFAS No~~flows. ~~121,~~ ~~real~~This ~~estate~~evaluation ~~under~~requires ~~development~~estimates isof ~~considered~~future torevenues, becosts ~~held~~and ~~for~~the ~~use whereas~~remaining ~~finished~~time ~~units are considered assets~~ to bedevelop ~~disposed~~the ~~of.~~project ~~In evaluating~~and ~~long-lived~~requires ~~assets held for use,~~ a ~~review~~substantial ~~for~~degree of ~~impairment~~judgment ~~loss~~by ismanagement. ~~triggered~~Actual ifrevenues, ~~the~~costs ~~sum~~and oftime ~~the expected future~~to ~~cash~~complete ~~flows~~development ~~(undiscounted~~could ~~and~~vary ~~without~~from ~~interest~~estimates ~~charges)~~which ~~is less~~could ~~than~~affect the ~~carrying~~Company’s ~~amount~~future results of ~~the asset~~operations. ~~Various assumptions and~~ ~~estimates~~Management ~~are~~reviews ~~used~~each toreal ~~determine~~estate ~~fair~~project ~~value~~on ~~in determining the~~a ~~amount~~community-by-community ofbasis ~~any~~to ~~impairment~~determine ~~loss~~whether ~~including,~~or ~~among others, estimated~~not ~~costs~~carrying ofamounts ~~construction,~~have ~~development~~been ~~and direct marketing, sales absorption rates, anticipated sales prices and carrying costs~~impaired. The ~~estimates~~adoption ~~used~~of toSFAS ~~determine any impairment adjustment can~~144 ~~change~~did ~~materially~~not inhave ~~the~~a ~~near~~material ~~term~~impact ason the ~~economy in the~~ Company’s ~~key~~financial position ~~areas~~or ~~changes~~results of operations.


	*Negative Goodwill*

Negative goodwill recorded as a result of the Exchange Transaction was being accreted over five years. During fiscal 2002, the Company recorded accretion of $1.3 million which was included as a reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses. Due to a recently promulgated change in accounting principles, the accretion of the remaining balance of negative goodwill of $5.4 million at February 28, 2002, increased income in fiscal 2003 by a corresponding amount through a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.


	*Revenue Recognition*

The Company’s revenue recognition policy for the sales of homes and land follows the provisions of SFAS 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” which specify minimum down payment requirements, financing terms and certain other requirements for sales of real estate.

Income from sales of homes and land is recognized when title has passed, the buyer has met minimum down payment requirements and the terms of any notes received by the Company satisfy continuing investment requirements. At the time of sale, accumulated costs are relieved from real estate projects and charged to cost of sales and interest expense on a relative sales value basis.


	*Warranty Costs*

Estimated future warranty costs are accrued and charged to cost of sales for each home concurrent with the recognition of revenue upon satisfaction of the requirements of SFAS 66. Amounts accrued are based

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~the~~upon ~~remaining~~historical ~~balance~~experience ofrates. ~~negative~~Accrued warranty ~~goodwill~~reserve ~~of $5.4 million~~is atincluded ~~February 28,~~in ~~2002~~accounts ~~will~~payable ~~increase~~and ~~income~~accrued liabilities in the ~~first~~accompanying ~~quarter~~consolidated ofbalance ~~fiscal~~sheets. Changes ~~2003~~in ~~through~~the aCompany’s ~~cumulative~~warranty ~~effect of~~reserve ~~change~~are detailed in the ~~accounting~~table ~~principle.~~set forth below:

Revenue Recognition



	February 28,

	2002			2003

Accrued warranty reserve, beginning of the year		1,030,000			1,923,000
Warranty costs accrued during the year		2,666,000			956,000
Warranty costs paid during the year		(1,773,000	)		(1,637,000	)

Accrued warranty reserve, end of the year		1,923,000			1,242,000

The Company’s revenue recognition policy for the sales of homes and land follows the provisions of SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” which specify minimum down payment requirements, financing terms and certain other requirements for sales of real estate.

The Company recognizes fees paid to its wholly-owned mortgage brokerage operation from third-party lenders concurrent with the closing on the sale of the residential unit. Such fees are classified in “Interest and other income, net” in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

Warranty Costs

Estimated future warranty costs are accrued and charged to cost of sales for each home concurrent with the recognition of revenue upon satisfaction of the requirements of SFAS No. 66.


	*Income Taxes*

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS ~~No.~~ 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires the liability method of accounting for income taxes.


	*Statements of Cash Flows*

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, short-term investments which have a maturity of 90 days or less from the date of purchase are considered cash equivalents.


	*Stock Options*

The Company accounts for equity-based compensation under SFAS ~~No.~~ 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” Under SFAS ~~No.~~ 123, ~~companies~~ companies have the option to implement a fair value-based ~~accounting~~ accounting method or continue to account for employee stock options and stock purchase plans using the intrinsic value based method of accounting as prescribed by Accounting Principles ~~Board~~ Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for ~~Stock~~ Stock Issued to Employees.” Entities electing to remain under APB ~~Opinion No.~~ 25 must make pro forma disclosures of net ~~income~~ income or loss and earnings per share as if the fair value based ~~method~~ method of accounting defined in SFAS ~~No.~~ 123 had been applied. The Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of ~~SFAS~~ ~~No.~~SFAS 123 and will continue accounting for stock options under APB ~~Opinion No.~~ 25.

~~Earnings~~ The ~~Per~~following ~~Common~~information ~~Share~~is provided pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option granted during the year ended February 28, 2001, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:

The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” This statement requires the presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per common share for financial statement purposes. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share includes the effect of the potential shares outstanding, including dilutive securities using the treasury stock method. The


	Fiscal 2001

Dividend yield		0	%
Expected volatility		56.5	%
Risk-free interest rate		6.12	%
Expected life		5 years

During the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003, no compensation expense was recognized related to the stock options granted, however, had compensation expense been determined consistent with SFAS 123 for the Company’s stock option grants for its stock-based compensation plan, the Company’s net

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~table~~income ~~below~~and ~~reconciles~~diluted ~~the~~earnings ~~components~~per ofcommon ~~the~~share for ~~basic~~the ~~earnings~~years ~~per~~ended ~~common~~February 28, ~~share~~2001, ~~calculation~~2002 toand ~~diluted~~2003, ~~earnings~~would ~~per~~approximate ~~common~~the ~~share~~pro forma amounts below (dollars in thousands, except per share ~~data~~amounts):

			Year Ended									Year Ended								Year Ended
		Fiscal 2001						Fiscal 2002						Fiscal 2003
			February 29, 2000									February 28, 2001								February 28, 2002
		As Reported			Pro Forma			As Reported			Pro Forma			As Reported			Pro Forma
			Income			Shares			EPS			Income			Shares			EPS		Income		Shares		EPS
Net income		$	12,189		$	12,099		$	6,292		$	6,164		$	9,664		$	9,642
Basic Earnings Per Share:
Diluted earnings per common share		$	0.88		$	0.88		$	0.43		$	0.42		$	0.64		$	0.64
	Income available to common stockholders before extraordinary item		$	5,227			13,923		$	0.37		$	10,728			13,773		$	0.77	$	6,292		14,620	$	0.43
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
	Warrants			—			—			—			—			—			—		—		51		—
	Stock options			—			91			—			—			123			—		—		124		—
Diluted Earnings Per Share before extraordinary item			$	5,227			14,014		$	0.37		$	10,728			13,896		$	0.77	$	6,292		14,795	$	0.43

The effects of applying SFAS 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts.


	*Earnings Per Common Share*

The Company follows the provisions of SFAS 128, “Earnings Per Share.” This statement requires the presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per common share for financial statement purposes. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share includes the effect of the potential shares outstanding, including dilutive securities using the treasury stock method. The table below reconciles the components of the basic earnings per common share calculation to diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):



		Year Ended						Year Ended						Year Ended
		February 28, 2001						February 28, 2002						February 28, 2003

		Income		Shares		EPS		Income		Shares		EPS		Income		Shares		EPS

Basic Earnings Per Share:
	Income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	10,728		13,773	$	0.77	$	6,292		14,620	$	0.43	$	4,217		14,906	$	0.28
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
	Warrants		—		—		—		—		51		—		—		—		—
	Stock options		—		123		—		—		124		—		—		52		—

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
	Income before extraordinary item and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	10,728		13,896	$	0.77	$	6,292		14,795	$	0.43	$	4,217		14,958	$	0.28

Net income, basic and diluted		$	12,189		13,896	$	0.88	$	6,292		14,795	$	0.43	$	9,664		14,958	$	0.64


	*Comprehensive Income*

The Company follows the provisions of ~~SFAS~~ ~~No.~~SFAS 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income.” ~~SFAS~~ ~~No.~~SFAS 130 requires that the Company (a) classify items of other comprehensive income by their nature in a financial statement and (b) display the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of the balance sheet (See Note 1011).


	*Segment Reporting*

Effective February 28, 1999, the Company adopted SFAS ~~No.~~ 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an an Enterprise and Related Information.” Under the ~~provisions~~ provisions of SFAS ~~No.~~ 131, the Company’s operations are conducted and aggregated primarily under one segment, homebuilding, at ~~this~~ this time.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for business combinations and supersedes APB Opinion No. 16, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 38, “Accounting for Preacquisition Contingencies of Purchased Enterprises.” All business combinations in the scope of this Statement are to be accounted for using one method, the purchase method. The Company will adopt SFAS 141 for any business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.

Also in June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. SFAS 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets.” This pronouncement addresses, among other things, how goodwill and other intangible assets should be accounted for after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements. Goodwill will no longer be amortized but will be assessed at least annually for impairment using a fair value methodology. The Company will adopt this statement for all goodwill and other intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001 and for all existing goodwill and other intangible assets beginning March 1, 2002. Upon adoption of this standard on March 1, 2002 the Company is required to accrete the remaining balance of negative goodwill through a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, which will increase net income in fiscal 2003 by approximately $5.4 million, or approximately $0.37 per diluted share. Other than the accretion of the remaining negative goodwill, the Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS 142 will have a significant effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

InNew ~~August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “~~Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. SFAS 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS 144 supersedes SFAS 121 and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions,” for the disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion). The provisions of SFAS 144 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, with early application encouraged and generally are to be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 144 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. SFAS 142 addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes APB 17, “Intangible Assets.” This pronouncement addresses, among other things, how goodwill and other intangible assets should be accounted for after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements. Goodwill will no longer be amortized but will be assessed at least annually for impairment using a fair value methodology. The Company will adopt this statement for all goodwill and other intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001 and did adopt it for all existing goodwill and other intangible assets beginning March 1, 2002. Upon adoption of this standard on March 1, 2002 the Company was required to accrete the remaining balance of negative goodwill through a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, which increased net income in fiscal 2003 by $5.4 million, or $0.36 per diluted share. Had the non-amortization provisions of SFAS 142 been adopted as of March 1, 2000, net income would have remained the same for fiscal 2001 and would have been $5.0 million or $0.34 per diluted share for fiscal 2002. Other than the accretion of the remaining negative goodwill, the adoption of SFAS 142 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46, which addresses financial reporting requirements for variable interest entities. In general, a variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust, or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (1) does not have equity investors with voting rights; or (2) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns or both. FIN 46 also requires disclosures about variable interest entities that the company is not required to consolidate but in which it has a significant variable interest. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements apply to entities existing at January 31, 2003 in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity was established. The Company is currently evaluating its existing arrangements and anticipates that the adoption of FIN 46 will not have a significant effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -Transition and Disclosure.” SFAS 148 amends SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide three alternative methods of transition to SFAS 123’s fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation for companies that elect to adopt the provisions of SFAS 123. Transition to SFAS 123 is not required by SFAS 148. The Company has elected to use the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock compensation in accordance with APB 25 and related interpretations.

SFAS 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 and APB 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require disclosure in the summary of significant accounting policies of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based compensation or reported net income and earnings per share in annual and interim financial statements. The disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 are required to be adopted by all companies with stock-based employee compensation, regardless of whether they account for that compensation using the fair value method of SFAS 123 or the intrinsic value method of APB 25. The disclosure provisions of SFAS 148, effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, have been adopted by the Company, with the appropriate disclosures under “Stock Based Compensation,” above.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FIN 45, which elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees, including loan guarantees. It also clarifies that at the time a company issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes under that guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and annual financial statements. FIN 45

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

does not apply to certain guarantee contracts, such as those issued by insurance companies or for a lessee’s residual value guarantee embedded in a capital lease. The provisions related to recognizing a liability at inception of the guarantee for the fair value of the guarantor’s obligations would not apply to product warranties or to guarantees accounted for as derivatives. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, regardless of the guarantor’s fiscal year-end. The disclosure requirements in FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145, “Rescission of SFAS No. 4, 44, 64 and Amendment of SFAS No. 13 and Technical Corrections.” SFAS 145 prevents treatment as extraordinary any gains or losses recognized on extinguishment of debt not meeting the criteria of APB 30. SFAS 145 is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 145 will affect the classification of such amounts in the financial statements of subsequent periods and comparative prior periods.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to certain prior year amounts in order to conform with the current year presentation.

2. Restricted Cash

The Company has restricted cash totaling $~~781~~365,000 and $~~365~~495,000 as of February 28, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2002~~2003, respectively. Restricted cash primarily consists of deposits to various municipalities, banks, and utilities to guarantee future performance of development obligations.

3. Real Estate Projects

Real estate projects consist of the following at February 28, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2002~~2003 (in thousands):

	2001		2002
	2002		2003
Land and improvements under construction	$	~~229~~157,~~207~~471	$	~~157~~145,~~471~~040
Completed residential homes		1224,~~678~~967		2428,~~967~~769
Completed model homes		1721,~~988~~247		2111,~~247~~082
	$	~~259~~203,~~873~~685	$	~~203~~184,~~685~~891

Total interest costs incurred during the years ended February ~~29, 2000, February~~ 28, 2001 ~~and February 28~~, 2002 and 2003 were $2425,~~465~~696,000, $2514,~~696~~798,000 and $1410,~~798~~310,000 respectively, all of which was initially capitalized to real estate projects.

3738

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

4. Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company is a general partner or a direct or indirect managing member and has a 50 percent or ~~lesser~~less ownership in 13 14 unconsolidated joint ventures at February 28, ~~2002~~2003. The Company’s net investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures are as follows at February 28, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2002~~2003 (in thousands):

		Capital		February 28,		~~February 28,~~		February 28,		~~February 28,~~
		Interest		2002		~~2001~~		2003		~~2002~~
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures:
	JMP Canyon Estates, L.P.		10%			$	162			$	112
	LB/ L — CPH Providence, LLC	10%		$	1,065			$	151
	JMP Harbor View, L.P.		10%				609				318
	LB/ L — CPH Longmont, LLC	10%			1,004				2,529
	Grand Coto Estates, L.P.		10%				231				546
	LB/ L — CPH Laguna Street, LLC	10%			946				1,119
	M.P.E. Partners, L.P.		10%				983				989
	CPH Daily Ranch, L.P.	10%			3,103				3,251
	LB/L — CPH Providence, LLC		10%				715				1,065
	CPH Sierra Peak, L.P.	50%			—				4,650
	LB/L — CPH Longmont, LLC		10%				1,087				1,004
	CPH Banning-Lewis Ranch, LLC	—			200				1,062
	LB/L — CPH Laguna Street, LLC		10%				—				946
	Other	Various			2,231				1,541
	CPH Daily Ranch, L.P.		10%				—				3,103
				$	8,549			$	14,303
	CPH Banning-Lewis Ranch, LLC		—				—				200
	Other		Various				—				266
							3,787				8,549
Divested Joint Ventures							1,486				—
						$	5,273			$	8,549

The Company’s ~~ownership~~economic interests in the unconsolidated joint ventures vary. Generally, the Company receives a portion of earnings ~~although~~after repayment of invested capital and payment of a preferred return on invested capital is provided. Typically, the majority of capital is provided by capital partners. ~~The~~In addition, the Company is typically arequired ~~general~~to ~~partner~~contribute orthe ~~managing~~full ~~member~~amount inof ~~each~~its capital obligation at the commencement of the ~~above~~joint ~~entities~~venture’s business, but in some ~~and~~cases the Company may have a contingent obligation to contribute additional capital. The Company is typically the direct or indirect managing entity pursuant to terms in each venture’s agreement. In the case of Divested Joint Ventures which are now Managed Projects, the Company or ~~its~~a subsidiary manages the development of the project under a management contract. ~~which~~Such management contracts as well as the unconsolidated joint venture agreements typically ~~provides~~provide for the payment of a fee to compensate the Company for overhead expenditures as well as reimbursement of all direct project costs. The Company~~’s carrying~~ amount in each of the unconsolidated joint ventures (and the Divested Joint Ventures prior to the Exchange Transaction) equals the underlying equity in the joint venture, and there are generally no significant amounts of undistributed earnings. The Company provides for income taxes currently on its share of distributed and undistributed earnings and losses from the investments.

The Company uses the equity method of accounting for its investments in the unconsolidated 50 or less percent-owned joint ventures. The accounting policies of the entities are substantially the same as those of the Company.

Following is summarized, combined financial information for the unconsolidated joint ventures atas of February 28, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2002~~2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended February 28, 2003 (in thousands). The ~~balance~~ balance sheet information at both dates does not include the ~~Divested~~ Divested Joint Ventures, but the ~~income statement information for the~~ ~~years ended February 29, 2000 and~~

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

February 28, 2001 does reflect the results of the Divested Joint Ventures because the Company held an ownership interest in those entities for all of fiscal 2000 and substantially all of fiscal 2001:

	2001		2002
Assets
Cash	$	512	$	1,163
Real estate projects		14,620		94,818
Other assets		611		1,275
	$	15,743	$	97,256

		2001		2002
Liabilities and Equity
Accounts payable and other liabilities		$	1,962	$	2,752
Due to the Company			2,205		3,066
Notes payable			1,878		5,539
			6,045		11,357
Equity
	The Company		1,278		5,260
	Others		8,420		80,639
			9,698		85,899
		$	15,743	$	97,256

	2000		2001		2002
Income Statement
Sales of homes and land	$	28,274	$	62,704	$	14,989
Interest and other income, net		16,296		16,214		2,146
		44,570		78,918		17,135
Costs and expenses		33,428		63,505		14,201
Net income	$	11,142	$	15,413	$	2,934

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

income statement information for the year ended February 28, 2001 reflects the results of the Divested Joint Ventures because the Company held an ownership interest in those entities for substantially all of fiscal 2001:


		2002		2003

Assets
Cash		$	1,163	$	299
Real estate projects			94,818		120,313
Other assets			1,275		2,997

		$	97,256	$	123,609

Liabilities and Equity
Accounts payable and other liabilities		$	2,529	$	3,910
Due to the Company			3,289		5,600
Notes payable			5,539		7,014

			11,357		16,524

Equity
	The Company		5,260		8,703
	Others		80,639		98,382

			85,899		107,085

		$	97,256	$	123,609


	2001		2002		2003

Income Statement
Sales of homes and land	$	62,704	$	14,989	$	21,351
Interest and other income, net		16,214		2,146		1,378

		78,918		17,135		22,729
Costs and expenses		63,505		14,201		18,222

Net income	$	15,413	$	2,934	$	4,507

5. Notes Payable

Notes payable at February 28, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2002~~2003, are summarized as follows (in thousands):

	2001		2002
	2002		2003
Senior unsecured revolving credit facility, bearing interest varying from LIBOR to prime, as selected by the Company, plus applicable margins	$	—90,658	$	9097,~~658~~626
Notes payable to banks, including interest varying from prime plus one quarter percent to LIBOR plus four and one quarter percent, maturing between July 31, 2002 and November 30, 2003, secured by certain real estate projects on a non-recourse basis		88,272		18,011
Senior subordinated note, bearing interest at LIBOR plus applicable margin, maturing October 31, 2007.		—		20,000
Notes payable to banks, including interest at prime, secured by certain real estate projects on a recourse basis, refinanced during the quarter via the revolving credit facility		16,158		—
Notes payable to banks, including interest varying from prime plus one quarter percent to LIBOR plus four and one quarter percent, maturing April 20, 2003, secured by certain real estate projects on a non-recourse basis (paid in full subsequent to February 28, 2003)		18,011		1,900
Other		57,~~793~~596		7,~~596~~037
	$	~~110~~116,~~223~~265	$	~~116~~126,~~265~~563

During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, CPH LLC entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility with several participant banks. The facility has a maximum commitment of $125 million and a two year revolving term. At the option of the Company, borrowings under the agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus applicable margin (4.10 percent at February 28, 2002) or at prime plus applicable margin (5.00 percent at February 28, 2002). Proceeds from this facility were used to pay down certain of CPH LLC’s existing facilities and retire the remaining $55.6 million of Senior Notes at face value. In addition, the Company fixed the interest rate on $50 million and $25 million of borrowings at 5.68% and 5.62%, respectively, until September 2003 through interest rate swap agreements with a bank.

At the current time, all material financing transactions and arrangements are incurred either by CPH LLC or by certain project-specific entities. As of February 28, 2002, CPH LLC has in place several credit facilities with contingent availabilities totaling $181 million (the “Facilities”) with various bank lenders (the “Banks”), of which $109 million was outstanding. The Facilities are secured by liens on various completed or under construction homes and lots held by CPH LLC and CPH Newport Coast, LLC and CPH Yucaipa I, LLC, which are wholly-owned subsidiaries. Pursuant to the Facilities, CPH LLC and the wholly-owned subsidiaries are subject to certain covenants, which require, among other things, the maintenance of a consolidated liabilities to net worth ratio, minimum liquidity, minimum net worth and loss limitations, all as defined in the documents that evidence the Facilities. At February 28, 2002, CPH LLC and the wholly-owned subsidiaries were in compliance with these covenants. The Facilities also define certain events that constitute events of default. As of February 28, 2002, no such event had occurred. Commitment fees are payable annually on some of the Facilities.

Homebuilding activity is being financed out of CPH LLC cash, bank financing, and the existing joint ventures, including joint ventures with institutional investors, including CHF. In addition, activity undertaken in certain of the Company’s joint ventures is financed through various non-recourse lending arrangements. The Company anticipates that it will continue to utilize both third party financing and joint ventures to cover financing needs in excess of internally generated cash flow.

During the years ended February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002, the highest month-end balance on notes payable was $126 million, $205 million and $168 million, respectively, and the weighted average outstanding balance was $111 million, $124 million and $124 million, respectively. The weighted average interest rates on notes payable during the years ended February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002, were 9.0 percent, 10.0 percent and 6.2 percent, respectively. The weighted average interest

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~rates~~At onthe ~~notes~~current ~~payable~~time, atall material financing transactions and arrangements are incurred either by CPH LLC or by certain project-specific entities. As of February 2928, ~~2000~~ 2003, the Company has in place credit facilities with contingent ~~February~~availabilities totaling $208 28million (the “Facilities”) with various bank lenders (the “Banks”), ~~2001~~of which $120 million was outstanding. Certain of the Facilities are secured by liens on various completed or under construction homes and lots held by CPH LLC or certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. Pursuant to the Facilities, CPH LLC and the wholly-owned subsidiaries are subject to certain covenants, which require, among other things, the maintenance of a consolidated liabilities to net worth ratio, minimum liquidity, minimum net worth and loss limitations, all as defined in the documents that evidence the Facilities. At February 28, ~~2002~~2003, CPH LLC and the wholly-owned subsidiaries were in compliance with these 9covenants.~~7 percent,~~ ~~8.4 percent~~The ~~and~~Facilities 5also define certain events that constitute events of default.1 As of February ~~percent~~28, 2003, no ~~respectively~~such event had occurred. Commitment fees are payable annually on some of the Facilities.

During the fiscal 2003, CPH LLC renewed and extended its senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Senior Facility”) with several participant banks. As of February 28, 2003, the facility had a maximum commitment of $130 million and a three year revolving term. Subsequent to fiscal 2003, the maximum commitment was increased to $140 million. At the option of the Company, borrowings under the agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus applicable margin (3.88 percent at February 28, 2003) or at prime plus applicable margin (4.75 percent at February 28, 2003). Initial proceeds from this facility were used to pay down certain of CPH LLC’s existing facilities and retire the remaining $55.6 million of its previously issued 12 3/4% Senior Notes (“Senior Notes”) at face value during fiscal 2002. In addition, the Company has fixed the interest rate on $75 million of borrowings at 5.9% until October 2005 through an interest rate swap agreement with a bank which was required by the terms of the Senior Facility (see Note 11). The Company also entered into a Senior Subordinated Credit Agreement in the initial amount of $20 million, with a maturity date in October 2007, and also entered into an interest swap as required by the terms of the Senior Subordinated Credit Agreement effectively fixing the interest rate on that obligation at 9.5% through its maturity in October 2007 (see Note 11). The Senior Subordinated Credit Agreement has a maximum commitment of $50 million.

During the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003, the highest month-end balance on notes payable was $205 million, $168 million and $146 million, respectively, and the weighted average outstanding balance was $124 million, $124 million and $137 million, respectively. The weighted average interest rates on notes payable during the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003, were 10.0 percent, 6.2 percent and 5.1 percent, respectively. The weighted average interest rates on notes payable at February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003, were 8.4 percent, 5.1 percent and 4.4 percent, respectively.

The aggregate scheduled principal maturities of notes payable are as follows (in thousands):

		As of
		February 28,
Fiscal Years Ending:		~~2002~~2003
2003		$	19,814
2004		$	3,670
2004			96,451
2005			414
	Total	$	116,265
2006			99,038
2007			496
2008			22,945
	Total	$	126,563

6. Senior Unsecured Notes Payable; Warrants

During fiscal 2000 and 2001, the Company repurchased $11.6 and $32.8 million of the Notes (face value), respectively, resulting in an extraordinary gain of $955,000 and $1,461,000, respectively. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company redeemed at face value the remaining $55.6 million of Senior Notes utilizing the proceeds of CPH LLC’s senior unsecured revolving credit facility obtained after the closing of the Exchange Transaction.

At February 28, 2001, unamortized bond issuance cost was $650,000, net of accumulated amortization of $5.2 million, which was being amortized over the term of the Notes utilizing the effective interest rate method. The balance of the unamortized bond issuance cost was fully amortized during fiscal 2002.

7. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consists of the following for the years ended February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002 (in thousands):

		2000		2001			2002
Current
	Federal	$	745	$	2,996		$	6,237
	State		700		865			1,317
			1,445		3,861			7,554
Deferred			300		(2,075	)		(4,797	)
Provision for income taxes		$	1,745	$	1,786		$	2,757

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~The~~6. ~~deferred~~Senior ~~income~~Unsecured ~~tax~~Notes ~~provision (benefit) at~~Payable; ~~February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002 results from the following temporary differences between financial and tax reporting (in thousands):~~ Warrants

	2000			2001			2002
Accrued expenses	$	22		$	(921	)	$	(2,362	)
Construction period expenses		197			569			(548	)
Depreciation		(40	)		(78	)		(126	)
Built-in losses		722			1,159			46
Net operating loss carryforward		(823	)		1,950			—
Real estate projects		—			—			(2,399	)
Property and equipment		—			—			498
Other		—			135			94
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance		222			(4,889	)		—
	$	300		$	(2,075	)	$	(4,797	)

In May, 1994, the Company issued $100 million principal amount of its 12 3/4 percent Senior Notes due May 1, 2002 (the “Notes”). In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company issued 790,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at a price of $3.30 per share, all of which were fully exercisable until May 1, 2002. Interest was due and payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The obligations associated with the Notes were transferred to CPH LLC. Effective May 1, 2001, the Notes became redeemable at the option of CPH LLC at par, plus accrued interest. During fiscal 2000 and 2001, the Company repurchased $11.6 and $32.8 million of the Notes (face value), respectively, resulting in an extraordinary gain of $955,000 and $1,461,000, respectively. During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company redeemed at face value the remaining $55.6 million of Senior Notes utilizing the proceeds of the Senior Facility obtained after the closing of the Exchange Transaction.

~~The~~At ~~components~~February 28, of2001, ~~the~~unamortized ~~Company’s deferred~~bond ~~income~~issuance ~~tax~~cost ~~asset~~was as$650,000, net of ~~February 28,~~accumulated ~~2001~~amortization ~~and~~of ~~February~~$5.2 28million, ~~2002~~which ~~are~~was asbeing ~~follows:~~amortized over the term of the Notes utilizing the effective interest rate method. The balance of the unamortized bond issuance cost was fully amortized during fiscal 2002.

	2001			2002
Accrued expenses	$	975		$	3,337
Construction period expenses		1,878			2,426
Depreciation		14			140
Built-in losses		2,367			2,321
Real estate projects		(5,701	)		(5,308	)
Property and equipment		1,197			843
Other		(41	)		(93	)
	$	689		$	3,666


7.	Income Taxes

AThe ~~reconciliation~~provision of(credit) ~~the~~for income ~~tax~~taxes ~~provision~~consists ~~computed~~of at the ~~federal~~following ~~statutory rate and the income tax provision~~ for ~~financial reporting purposes for~~ the years ended ~~February 29,~~ ~~2000,~~ February 28, 2001 ~~and February 28~~, 2002, ~~are~~and as2003 ~~follows~~(in thousands):

		2000				2001				2002
			2001				2002				2003
Income taxes at statutory rate			34	%			34	%			35	%
Current
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit			3				6				3
	Federal		$	2,996			$	6,237			$	1,192
Franchise tax liability			2				3				2
	State			865				1,317				537
Income tax accrued on Exchange Transaction			—				10				—
				3,861				7,554				1,729
Reversal of valuation allowance			—				(39	)			—
Deferred				(2,075	)			(4,797	)			(243	)
Accretion of negative goodwill			—				—				(8	)
Provision for income taxes			$	1,786			$	2,757			$	1,486
Utilization of loss carryforwards			(14	)			—				—
Other			—				—				(2	)
			25	%			14	%			30	%

The deferred income tax provision (benefit) at February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003 results from the following temporary differences between financial and tax reporting (in thousands):


	2001			2002			2003

Accrued expenses	$	(921	)	$	(2,362	)	$	1,013
Construction period expenses		569			(548	)		(2,065	)
Depreciation		(78	)		372			426
Built-in losses		1,159			46			2,009
Net operating loss carryforward		1,950			—			—
Real estate projects		—			(2,399	)		(1,933	)
Other		135			94			307
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance		(4,889	)		—			—

	$	(2,075	)	$	(4,797	)	$	(243	)

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The components of the Company’s net deferred income tax asset as of February 28, 2002 and 2003 are as follows (in thousands):


	2002			2003

Accrued expenses	$	3,337		$	2,324
Construction period expenses		2,426			4,491
Depreciation		983			557
Built-in losses		2,321			312
Real estate projects		(5,308	)		(3,375	)
Other		(93	)		(530	)

	$	3,666		$	3,779

A reconciliation of the income tax provision computed at the federal statutory rate and the income tax provision for financial reporting purposes for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003, are as follows:


	2001			2002			2003

Income taxes at statutory rate		34	%		35	%		35	%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit		6			3			4
Income tax accrued on Exchange Transaction		10			—			—
Reversal of valuation allowance		(39	)		—			—
Accretion of negative goodwill and other		3			(8	)		(13	)

		14	%		30	%		26	%


8.	Stockholders’ Equity

In fiscal 1998, the Company announced a stock repurchase program whereby up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock may be repurchased by CPH, Inc. or CPH LLC. As of February 28, ~~2002~~2003, ~~661~~750,~~800~~100 shares had been repurchased ~~and~~cumulatively ~~held~~ under this program. In addition, ~~as of February 28, 2002,~~ the Company has repurchased ~~373~~on a cumulative basis 657,~~511~~095 of the 790,000 warrants originally issued in ~~connection~~ connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes. Of the remaining warrants, 123,951 were exercised and 8,954 expired unexercised during fiscal 2003.

In connection with the Exchange Transaction, the Company issued 1,235,000 shares of non-voting Common Stock to CHF. These shares are identical in all respects to the voting Common Stock of the Company with the exception of voting privileges.

9Subsequent to February 28, 2003, as the result of the settlement of certain litigation (See Note 13), 772,312 shares of the Company’s voting Common Stock held by affiliates was converted into non-voting stock. As of February 28, 2003, a total of 2,007,312 shares of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock ~~Option~~was non-voting. ~~Plan~~

~~Effective~~9. ~~February 28, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan~~ 401(~~the “1995 Plan”~~k). ~~The~~Savings ~~1995~~ Plan permits a committee designated by the Board of Directors to make awards to key employees and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. Subject to various restrictions, awards could be in the form of stock options, restricted or unrestricted stock, stock appreciation rights or a combination of the above. The maximum number of shares or share equivalents that may be awarded under the 1995 Plan is 1,500,000.

~~Options~~The ~~are~~Company ~~granted~~established toa ~~purchase~~401(k) ~~shares~~Savings ~~at prices~~Plan ~~equal~~(the to“Plan”) ~~the~~in ~~fair~~January ~~market~~1993. ~~value~~Currently, ofall ~~the~~full-time employees ~~shares~~are ateligible ~~the~~to ~~date~~participate ofafter attaining three ~~grant.~~months ~~The~~of ~~options~~service. ~~vest~~Employees ~~over~~may acontribute ~~one~~up to ~~five~~the ~~year~~allowable Internal ~~period~~Revenue ~~and~~Service ~~are~~contribution limit. The Company matches ~~exercisable~~50 cents atfor ~~various~~every ~~dates~~dollar ~~over~~of ~~one~~employee tocontributions ~~10 year~~up ~~periods.~~to ~~When~~4% ~~the~~of ~~options~~their ~~are~~annual ~~exercised~~compensation, ~~the~~subject ~~proceeds~~to ~~will~~limitations beimposed by ~~credited~~the ~~to equity~~Internal ~~along~~Revenue ~~with~~Code. ~~the~~The ~~related~~Company ~~income~~may ~~tax~~also ~~benefits~~make discretionary contributions, ifsubject ~~any~~to certain limitations. No

The following is a summary of the transactions relating to the Company’s stock option plan for the years ended February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002:

	Fiscal 2000					Fiscal 2001					Fiscal 2002
				Weighted					Weighted					Weighted
				Average					Average					Average
				Exercise					Exercise					Exercise
	Options			Price		Options			Price		Options			Price
Options outstanding, beginning of year		256,000		$	2.75		463,000		$	2.28		600,500		$	2.37
Granted		250,000			1.88		250,000			2.50		—			—
Exercised		—			—		—			—		—			—
Canceled		(43,000	)		2.75		(112,500	)		2.39		(274,334	)		2.43
Options outstanding, end of year		463,000		$	2.28		600,500		$	2.37		326,166		$	2.32
Options exercisable at end of year		71,000					171,499					225,668
Options available for future grant		1,037,000					899,500					1,173,834

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~The~~discretionary ~~following~~contributions ~~information~~were ismade ~~provided~~in ~~pursuant to~~fiscal ~~the~~2001, ~~requirements~~2002 ofor ~~SFAS No~~2003. ~~123.~~ The ~~fair~~Company ~~value~~incurred ofand ~~each option~~charged ~~granted~~to ~~during~~expense approximately ~~the~~$311,000, ~~years~~$237,000 ~~ended~~and ~~February 29~~$226,000 ~~2000~~during ~~and~~fiscal ~~February 28,~~ 2001, is2002 ~~estimated~~and ~~using~~2003, ~~the~~respectively, ~~Black-Scholes option-pricing~~related ~~model~~to on the ~~date of grant using the following~~Plan. ~~weighted average assumptions:~~

	Fiscal 2000			Fiscal 2001
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Expected volatility		56.5	%		25.8	%
Risk-free interest rate		6.12	%		5.88	%
Expected life		5 years			5 years


10.	Stock Option Plan

~~The~~Effective ~~108~~February 28,~~000,~~ ~~134~~1995,~~833~~ ~~and~~the ~~83,333~~Board ~~options granted~~of inDirectors ~~fiscal~~of ~~1999,~~the ~~2000~~Company ~~and~~approved ~~2001,~~the ~~respectively,~~1995 ~~which~~Stock ~~remain~~Incentive Plan ~~outstanding~~(the as“1995 ofPlan”). ~~February 28,~~The ~~2002~~1995 ~~have~~Plan ~~exercise~~permits ~~prices~~a ofcommittee ~~$2.75,~~designated ~~$1.875~~by ~~and~~the ~~$2.50,~~Board ~~respectively,~~of ~~and~~Directors ato ~~remaining~~make awards to key ~~contractual~~employees ~~life~~and directors of ~~6.92,~~the ~~7.58~~Company and 8its subsidiaries.~~59 years,~~ ~~respectively.~~Subject Asto ofvarious ~~February 28~~restrictions, ~~2002,~~awards ~~225,668~~could ofbe ~~these options~~in ~~are~~the ~~exercisable.~~form ~~The~~of stock ~~per~~options, ~~share~~restricted ~~fair~~or ~~value~~unrestricted ofstock, ~~all options~~stock ~~granted~~appreciation ~~during~~rights ~~fiscal~~or ~~2000~~a ~~and~~combination ~~2001~~of ~~was~~the $1above.03 ~~and~~The ~~$0.87,~~maximum ~~respectively.~~number Noof ~~stock~~shares ~~options~~or ~~were~~share ~~granted~~equivalents ~~during~~that ~~fiscal~~may ~~2002~~be awarded under the 1995 Plan is 1,500,000.

~~During~~Options ~~the~~are ~~years~~granted ~~ended~~to ~~February 29,~~purchase ~~2000, February 28,~~shares ~~2001~~at ~~and February 28, 2002, no compensation~~prices ~~expense~~equal ~~was recognized related~~ to the ~~stock~~fair ~~options~~market ~~granted, however,~~value ~~had~~of ~~compensation~~the ~~expense~~shares ~~been~~at ~~determined~~the ~~consistent with~~date ~~SFAS No~~of grant. ~~123~~ ~~for~~The ~~the~~options ~~Company’s~~vest ~~stock~~over ~~option grants~~a ~~for~~one ~~its~~to ~~stock-based~~five ~~compensation~~year ~~plan,~~period ~~the~~and ~~Company’s~~are ~~income~~exercisable ~~before~~at ~~extraordinary~~various ~~item~~dates ~~and~~over ~~diluted~~one ~~earnings~~to ~~per~~10 year ~~common~~periods. ~~share~~When ~~for~~ the ~~years~~options ~~ended~~are ~~February 29~~exercised, ~~2000, February 28,~~the ~~2001~~proceeds ~~and~~will ~~February 28,~~be ~~2002~~credited ~~would~~to ~~approximate~~equity ~~the~~along ~~pro~~with ~~forma~~the ~~amounts~~related ~~below~~income ~~(Dollars~~tax ~~in thousands~~benefits, ~~except~~ ~~per~~if ~~share amounts):~~any.

	Fiscal 2000				Fiscal 2001				Fiscal 2002
	As Reported		Pro Forma		As Reported		Pro Forma		As Reported		Pro Forma
Income before extraordinary item	$	5,227	$	5,144	$	10,728	$	10,638	$	6,292	$	6,164
Diluted earnings per common share before extraordinary item	$	0.37	$	0.37	$	0.77	$	0.77	$	0.43	$	0.42

The following is a summary of the transactions relating to the Company’s stock option plan for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003:

The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not indicative of future amounts.



	Fiscal 2001					Fiscal 2002					Fiscal 2003

				Weighted					Weighted					Weighted
				Average					Average					Average
				Exercise					Exercise					Exercise
	Options			Price		Options			Price		Options			Price

Options outstanding, beginning of year		463,000		$	2.28		600,500		$	2.37		326,166		$	2.32
Granted		250,000			2.50		—			—		—			—
Exercised		—			—		—			—		—
Canceled		(112,500	)		2.39		(274,334	)		2.43		(112,834	)		2.27

Options outstanding, end of year		600,500		$	2.37		326,166		$	2.32		213,332		$	2.36

Options exercisable at end of year		171,499					225,668					184,999

Options available for future grant		899,500					1,173,834					1,286,668

10The 64,833, 75,166 and 73,333 options granted in fiscal 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively, which remain outstanding as of February 28, 2003 have exercise prices of $2. ~~Comprehensive~~75, $1.875 and $2.50, respectively, and a remaining ~~Income~~contractual life of 5.92, 6.58 and ~~Implementation~~7.59 years, respectively. As of ~~SFAS~~February 28, 2003, 184,999 of these options are exercisable. The per share fair value of all options granted during fiscal 2001 was $0.87. No stock options were granted during fiscal 2002 or 2003. ~~133~~

~~Effective March 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No~~11. ~~133,~~ ~~“Accounting~~Comprehensive ~~for~~Income ~~Derivative Instruments~~ and ~~Hedging~~Implementation ~~Activities”,~~of ~~as amended.~~ SFAS ~~133 establishes~~ accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities by requiring that all derivatives be recognized in the balance sheet and measured at fair value. The Company’s policy is to designate at a derivative’s inception the specific assets, liabilities, or future commitments being hedged and monitor the derivative to determine if it remains an effective hedge. 133

~~The~~Effective ~~Company~~March 1, ~~has~~2001, ~~various~~the ~~interest~~Company ~~rate swap~~adopted ~~agreements~~SFAS 133, ~~which~~“Accounting ~~effectively~~for ~~fix~~Derivative ~~the~~Instruments ~~variable interest rate on a~~and ~~notional~~Hedging ~~amount~~Activities”, ofas ~~$75~~amended. SFAS ~~million~~133 ~~of the senior unsecured~~establishes ~~revolving~~accounting ~~credit~~and ~~facility~~reporting ~~related~~standards tofor ~~its~~derivative ~~homebuilding~~instruments ~~operations.~~and ~~The~~for ~~swap~~hedging ~~agreements~~activities ~~have~~by ~~been~~requiring ~~designated~~that asall ~~cash~~derivatives be ~~flow~~recognized ~~hedges~~in ~~and,~~the ~~accordingly,~~balance ~~are~~sheet ~~reflected~~and measured at ~~their~~ fair value. The inCompany’s ~~the~~policy ~~consolidated~~is ~~balance~~to ~~sheet~~designate at ~~February 28,~~a ~~2002. The~~derivative’s ~~unrealized~~inception ~~loss,~~the asspecific ~~of February 28~~assets, ~~2002~~liabilities, ofor ~~$520,000 is~~future ~~recorded~~commitments inbeing ~~stockholders’~~hedged ~~equity~~and asmonitor ~~accumulated~~the ~~other~~derivative to determine ~~comprehensive~~if ~~loss~~it remains an effective hedge.

Amounts to be received or paid as a result of the swap agreements are recognized as adjustments to interest incurred on the related debt instruments. The Company believes that there will be no ineffectiveness related to the interest rate swaps and therefore no portion of the accumulated other comprehensive loss would be reclassified into future earnings. The net effect on the Company’s operating results is that interest on the variable-rate debt being hedged is recorded and paid based on fixed interest rates.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

11The Company has various interest rate swap agreements which effectively fix the variable interest rate on a notional amount of $95 million of its Senior Facility and Senior Subordinated Credit Agreement. ~~Related~~ ~~Party~~The swap agreements have ~~Transactions~~been designated as cash flow hedges and, accordingly, are reflected at their fair value in the consolidated balance sheet at February 28, 2003. The unrealized loss, as of February 28, 2003, of $2,512,000 (net of tax benefit of $1,675,000) is recorded in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive loss.

InAmounts ~~fiscal~~to ~~2000,~~be ~~the~~received ~~Company~~or ~~contributed~~paid ~~cash~~as a result of the ~~totaling~~swap ~~$3,278,000~~agreements toare ~~unconsolidated~~recognized ~~joint~~as ~~ventures.~~adjustments Into ~~fiscal~~interest ~~2001,~~incurred on the related debt instruments. The Company ~~contributed~~believes that ~~cash~~there ~~totaling~~will ~~$1,244,000~~be no ineffectiveness related to the interest ~~unconsolidated~~rate ~~joint~~swaps ~~ventures~~and therefore no portion of the accumulated other comprehensive loss would be reclassified into future earnings. The Innet ~~fiscal~~effect ~~2002,~~on the Company’s operating results is that ~~contributed~~interest ~~cash~~on ~~totaling~~the ~~$4,039,000~~variable-rate todebt ~~unconsolidated~~being ~~joint~~hedged is recorded and ~~ventures~~paid based on fixed interest rates.

~~The Company has made reimbursable advances to unconsolidated joint ventures (including the Divested Joint Ventures) for construction and other expenditures~~12. ~~The~~Related ~~balance of~~Party advances at February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002 was $10,588,000, $3,725,000 and $3,220,000, respectively. These amounts are included in investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. During fiscal 2000 and fiscal 2001, the Company charged interest totaling $1,422,000 and $338,000, respectively, to the joint ventures based on these advances. Transactions

~~During~~In fiscal ~~2000,~~ 2001 ~~and 2002~~, the Company contributed cash ~~recognized~~totaling $121,~~446~~244,000 to unconsolidated joint ventures. In fiscal 2002, the Company contributed cash totaling $124,~~092~~039,000 ~~and~~to unconsolidated joint ventures. In fiscal 2003, the Company contributed cash totaling $4,~~330~~752,000, to unconsolidated joint ~~respectively,~~ventures. inThe ~~construction~~Company ~~overhead~~has ~~reimbursements~~made ~~from~~reimbursable advances to unconsolidated joint ventures (including the Divested Joint Ventures). ~~Amounts~~for ~~are~~construction ~~received~~and ~~pursuant~~other toexpenditures. ~~terms~~The balance of ~~the~~advances ~~joint venture~~at ~~agreements~~February 28, ~~which~~2001, ~~generally~~2002 ~~specify~~and a2003 ~~fixed payment per~~was ~~month~~$3,725,000, ~~over~~$3,220,000 ~~the~~and ~~anticipated~~$5,570,000, ~~period of development~~respectively. ~~Such amounts~~These amounts are included in ~~selling,~~investment ~~general~~in and ~~administrative~~advances ~~expenses as~~to aunconsolidated ~~reimbursement~~joint ofventures ~~costs incurred~~ in the accompanying ~~income~~consolidated ~~statements~~balance sheets. AsDuring afiscal ~~result~~2001, of the ~~Exchange~~Company ~~Transaction,~~charged ~~the amount~~interest oftotaling ~~overhead incurred~~$338,000 asto ~~well as~~ the ~~corresponding reimbursements,~~joint ~~will~~ventures ~~decrease~~based inon ~~the~~these ~~future years with respect to the Divested Joint Ventures~~advances.

Included in accounts receivable at February 28, ~~2001~~2002 and February 28, ~~2002~~2003 is $1270,~~805,~~000 and $~~270~~197,000, respectively, of amounts owed from the Company’s various unconsolidated joint ventures to the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Newport Design Center, Inc. for goods and services rendered.

~~Effective~~During ~~February 23,~~fiscal 2001, ~~CPH,~~2002 ~~Inc.~~ and ~~CHF~~ ~~consummated~~2003, the ~~Exchange~~Company recognized ~~Transaction~~$12,092,000, ~~as further described in Note 1 above~~$4,330,000 ~~whereby~~and ~~CPH~~$3,970,000, ~~Inc. exchanged its 0.7%~~respectively, ~~capital~~in ~~interests~~construction ~~and~~overhead ~~contingent~~reimbursements ~~profit~~from ~~interest in the majority~~unconsolidated ~~of the~~ joint ventures ~~capitalized by CHF~~ (including the Divested Joint Ventures). ~~for~~Amounts are ~~all~~received ofpursuant ~~CHF’s~~to ~~interest~~terms inof ~~CPH~~the ~~LLC~~joint ~~and~~venture ~~all~~agreements, ofwhich ~~CHF’s~~generally ~~interests~~specify ina ~~certain~~fixed ~~residential~~payment ~~joint~~per ~~ventures. As~~month aover ~~result~~the anticipated period of ~~the~~development. ~~Exchange~~Such ~~Transaction,~~amounts asare ~~further~~included ~~described~~ in ~~Note 1 above~~selling, ~~CPH,~~general ~~Inc.’s~~and ~~interest~~administrative inexpenses ~~total~~as ~~capital~~a ofreimbursement ~~CPH~~of ~~LLC~~costs ~~increased~~incurred byin ~~48%~~the oraccompanying ~~$35~~income statements.~~6 million.~~ As a result of the Exchange Transaction, as further described in Note 1 1 above, ~~CPH, Inc. has no further exposure to~~ the ~~economic~~amount ~~or entitlement~~of ~~risks~~overhead ~~associated with the Divested Joint Ventures and the Managed Projects~~incurred, ~~including~~as nowell ~~obligation~~as ~~to provide any capital. Once~~ the ~~accounting effects of the Exchange Transaction~~ ~~are~~corresponding ~~fully realized~~reimbursements, ~~stockholder’s equity per share will have increased by $0~~decreased.~~99 or 17% solely as the result of the~~ ~~transaction.~~

~~Under~~Effective ~~the Exchange Transaction~~February 23, ~~the Company transferred its interests in the Divested Projects to Makallon~~2001, ~~LLC~~ ~~(“Makallon”)~~CPH, ~~which~~Inc. ~~is beneficially owned by CHF~~ and ~~by a former director and officer of the Company, who is a~~ ~~relative~~CHF ofconsummated the ~~Chairman of the Board of the Company. In connection with the~~ Exchange Transaction, ~~Capital~~whereby ~~Pacific Homes, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of~~ CPH, Inc., exchanged ~~has~~its ~~entered~~0.75% ~~into construction,~~capital ~~management~~interests and ~~marketing~~contingent ~~agreements with Makallon~~profit ~~relating~~interest toin the ~~Managed~~majority ~~Projects~~of ~~whereby~~the ~~CPH,~~joint ~~Inc.~~ventures ~~will~~capitalized beby ~~compensated~~CHF ~~for~~including ~~performing~~the ~~such~~Divested ~~services~~Joint ~~through~~Ventures afor ~~management fee~~all ~~arrangement.~~of InCHF’s interest ~~addition,~~in ~~the~~CPH ~~Company~~LLC ~~has~~and ~~entered~~all ~~into~~of ~~a lease~~CHF’s ~~agreement~~interests ~~with Makallon for office space~~ in ~~one building~~certain ~~owned~~residential ~~by a certain~~ joint ~~venture controlled by Makallon~~ventures. ~~The original~~As ~~term~~a result of the ~~lease is three years with the opportunity~~Exchange ~~for~~Transaction, ~~multiple~~CPH, ~~extensions at the Company~~Inc.’s ~~option.~~interest ~~During~~in ~~the fiscal~~total ~~year~~capital ~~the~~of ~~Company~~CPH LLC ~~paid~~increased ~~Makallon~~by ~~approximately~~48% ~~$400,000~~or ~~for rent~~$35.6 million. As ~~described~~a ~~above,~~result inof ~~consideration for~~ the ~~assets given~~ ~~up in the~~ Exchange Transaction, CPH, Inc. ~~received~~has ano ~~substantial increase~~further exposure to ~~its~~the economic ~~equity~~or inentitlement ~~the~~risks ~~homebuilding~~associated ~~operations~~with ofthe ~~CPH~~Divested ~~LLC~~Joint ~~and~~Ventures ~~several~~or ~~other~~Managed ~~homebuilding~~Projects, ~~joint~~including ~~ventures~~no obligation to provide any capital.

~~During~~Under ~~fiscal~~the ~~2000~~Exchange ~~approximately $193~~Transaction,~~000~~ ~~was~~the Company ~~paid~~transferred its interests in the Divested Projects to aMakallon, LLC ~~company~~(“Makallon”), ~~partially~~which is beneficially owned by CHF and by a former director and officer of the Company, who is a relative of the Chairman of the Board ~~for~~of ~~services~~the ~~rendered~~Company. in In connection with ~~website~~the Exchange Transaction, Capital Pacific Homes, ~~design~~Inc., ~~and~~a ~~maintenance~~wholly-owned subsidiary of CPH, Inc., has entered into construction, management and marketing agreements with Makallon relating to the ~~development~~Managed ofProjects whereby CPH, Inc. is compensated for performing such services through a ~~virtual~~management fee ~~reality~~arrangement. In addition, the Company has entered into a ~~tour~~lease ofagreement with Makallon for office space in one building owned by a certain joint venture controlled by Makallon. The original term of the lease is three years with the opportunity for multiple extensions at the Company’s ~~model homes~~option. During fiscal 2002 and 2003 the Company paid

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

AnMakallon ~~officer~~approximately of$400,000 ~~the~~and ~~Company~~$480,000, respectively ~~purchased~~for arent. ~~home~~As ~~from~~described above, in consideration for the ~~Company~~assets given up in ~~fiscal~~the ~~2001~~Exchange ~~for~~Transaction, $1CPH,~~450,000~~ Inc. received ~~During~~a ~~fiscal~~substantial ~~2002, two~~increase ~~different~~to ~~officers~~its equity in the homebuilding operations of CPH LLC and several other homebuilding joint ventures. Effective February 28, 2003, the Company ~~purchased~~reduced ~~homes~~the ~~from~~amount ~~one~~ of space being leased from Makallon in connection with the ~~Managed~~consolidation ~~Projects~~of ~~for~~the Company’s ~~$1,451,000~~Southern ~~and~~California ~~$976,000,~~homebuilding activities into ~~respectively~~new offices in Riverside County.

12In addition, the Company has entered into an agreement to purchase developed lots in one of the Managed Projects in California. ~~Commitments~~ No lots had been purchased under this ~~and~~agreement ~~Contingencies~~as of February 28, 2003. The Company has also entered into an agreement with Makar Properties, an affiliate of Makallon, to develop lots in a project owned by the Company in Texas.

An officer of the Company purchased a home from the Company in fiscal 2001 for $1,450,000. During fiscal 2002, two different officers of the Company purchased homes from one of the Managed Projects for $1,451,000 and $976,000, respectively. During fiscal 2003, the relative of the Chairman referred to above purchased a home from the Company for $1,735,000. During fiscal 2003, the Chairman paid approximately $100,000 to a subsidiary of the Company for residential design and improvement services.

In February 2003, the Company sold an undeveloped parcel of land to an entity controlled by the relative of the Chairman referred to above for $5.2 million, resulting in a gain to the Company of approximately $2.9 million. The Company holds a note receivable from that entity in the amount of $4.1 million in connection with that transaction.

Subsequent to February 28, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase developed lots in Texas from an entity controlled by Makar Properties, as well as to lease office space from an affiliate of Makar Properties.


13.	Commitments and Contingencies


	*General*

Approximately $4742,~~352~~301,000 and $4241,~~301~~810,000 of performance bonds which have been issued on behalf of both CPH LLC and certain joint ventures, by which the Company has been indemnified, were outstanding at February 28, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~February 28~~2003, ~~2002,~~ respectively. The estimated cost to complete the development work related to the performance bonds is was $3313,~~147~~267,000 and $135,~~267~~629,000 at February 28, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~February 28,~~ ~~2002~~2003, respectively. The beneficiaries of these bonds are certain municipalities. Additionally, at February 28, ~~2002~~2003, CPH LLC has an outstanding ~~letter~~letters of credit with a bank ~~in the amount of~~ totaling $1,~~488~~854,000.

CPH LLC has entered into agreements to lease certain office equipment and facilities under operating leases which expire at various dates through fiscal year ~~2007~~2008. The facility leases generally provide that CPH LLC shall pay property taxes, insurance and other items. Minimum payments under noncancelable leases at February 28, ~~2002~~2003, are as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Years Ending:
2003		$	1,566
2004		$	1,613
2004			1,172
2005			1,123
2005			550
2006			565
2006			222
2007			348
2007			88
2008			83
	Total	$	3,~~598~~732

Total rent expense was $769,000, $1,153,000 and $1,366,000 for the years ended February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002, respectively.

As discussed in Notes 1 and 4, CPH LLC is a general partner in certain joint venture partnerships. As a general partner, CPH LLC is liable for all debts of the partnerships without limitation to the respective partnership interest.

Dividends

No dividends were declared or paid for the years ended February 29, 2000, February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in routine claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. A former senior executive officer of the Company has filed a suit styled in part as a shareholder derivative suit which the Company considers to be without merit challenging the Exchange Transaction (described in Note 1). The Company intends to vigorously defend its interests regarding this litigation, including pursuing all available counterclaims and appeals. Although the legal responsibility and financial impact with respect to pending claims and litigation cannot be presently ascertained.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~13.~~ ~~Disclosures~~ ~~About~~Total ~~Fair~~rent ~~Value~~expense ofwas ~~Financial~~$1,153,000, ~~Instruments~~$1,366,000 and $1,537,000 for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

CPH LLC is a general partner in certain joint venture partnerships that have completed operations. As a general partner, CPH LLC is liable for all debts of these partnerships without limitation to the respective partnership interest.


	*Dividends*

No dividends were declared or paid for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003.


	*Legal Proceedings*

The Company is involved in routine claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. The legal responsibility and financial impact to the Company with respect to pending litigation cannot be presently ascertained. In the opinion of management, these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The previously disclosed suit styled in part as a shareholder derivative suit has been settled and the Company had no financial obligation under the settlement. A notice describing the proposed terms of the settlement and providing an opportunity to object was mailed to all shareholders in December 2002. After no objections were received a notice of the Court’s final approval of the settlement was mailed to all shareholders in February 2003.


14.	Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate:

Cash and Cash Equivalents — The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. These assets primarily consist of short-term investments and demand deposits. Notes Payable to Banks — These notes payable mature in two to three years. The rates of interest paid on the notes approximate the current rates available for secured real estate financing with similar terms and maturities. Senior Unsecured Notes Payable Due 2002 — This issue was not publicly traded on a major exchange. Consequently, the fair value of this issue at February 28, 2001 is based on the repurchase closest to the year ended February 28, 2001. These Notes were redeemed during fiscal 2002. Interest Rate Swaps — These instruments are accounted for in accordance with SFAS 133 and are marked to market at each reporting period.

Notes Payable to Banks — These notes payable mature over the next five years. The rates of interest paid on the notes approximate the current rates available for secured and unsecured real estate financing with similar terms and maturities.

Interest Rate Swaps — These instruments are accounted for in accordance with SFAS 133 and are marked to market at each reporting period.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):

		At February 28, 2001				At February 28, 2002
		At February 28, 2002				At February 28, 2003
		Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
		Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Financial Assets:
	Cash and equivalents	$	7,552	$	7,552	$	5,080	$	5,080
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,080	$	5,080	$	6,231	$	6,231
Financial Liabilities:
	Notes payable		~~110~~116,~~223~~265		~~110~~116,~~223~~346		~~116~~126,~~265~~563		~~116~~126,~~346~~563
	Senior unsecured notes payable		55,592		51,978		—		—
	Interest rate swaps		520		520		4,187		4,187
	Interest rate swaps		—		—		520		520

14. Unaudited Summarized Quarterly Financial Data

Summarized quarterly financial data for the years ended February 28, 2001 and February 28, 2002 is as follows (in thousands except per share data):

		Quarter
		First		Second		Third		Fourth		Total
2001:
	Sales of homes and land	$	65,034	$	96,215	$	84,583	$	117,911	$	363,743
	Gross margin		14,388		22,893		21,438		32,692		91,411
	Net income	$	2,289	$	2,544	$	1,830	$	5,526	$	12,189
	Earnings per common share — basic and diluted	$	0.17	$	0.18	$	0.13	$	0.40	$	0.88
2002:
	Sales of homes and land	$	77,494	$	81,206	$	60,209	$	79,792	$	298,701
	Gross margin		19,612		20,199		14,135		18,382		72,328
	Net income	$	1,430	$	1,215	$	872	$	2,775	$	6,292
	Earnings per common share — basic and diluted	$	0.10	$	0.08	$	0.06	$	0.19	$	0.43

~~REPORT~~CAPITAL OFPACIFIC ~~INDEPENDENT~~HOLDINGS, ~~AUDITORS~~INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

ToNOTES ~~the~~TO ~~Partners~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~Grand~~15. ~~Coto~~Unaudited ~~Estates,~~Summarized ~~L.P.~~ Quarterly Financial Data

WeSummarized ~~have~~quarterly ~~audited~~financial ~~the~~data ~~accompanying statements of operations, partners’ capital (deficit) and cash flows of Grand Coto Estates, L.P., a California limited partnership (the “Partnership”),~~ for the ~~year~~ years ended ~~December~~February 3128, ~~1999.~~ ~~These~~2002 ~~financial~~and ~~statements~~February 28, ~~are~~2003 ~~the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility~~ is ~~to express~~as anfollows ~~opinion~~(in onthousands ~~these~~except ~~financial~~per ~~statements~~share ~~based on our audit.~~data):

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



		Quarter

		First		Second		Third		Fourth		Total

2002:
	Sales of homes and land	$	77,494	$	81,206	$	60,209	$	79,792	$	298,701
	Net income		1,430		1,215		872		2,775		6,292
	Earnings per common share — basic and diluted		0.10		0.08		0.06		0.19		0.43
2003:
	Sales of homes and land	$	44,846	$	47,020	$	70,398	$	84,857	$	247,121
	Net income		6,199		394		276		2,795		9,664
	Earnings per common share — basic and diluted		0.42		0.03		0.02		0.19		0.64

InQuarterly ~~our~~per ~~opinion,~~share ~~the~~amounts ~~financial~~may ~~statements~~not ~~referred~~ add to ~~above present fairly, in all material respects,~~ the ~~results~~ offull ~~operations and cash flows of Grand Coto Estates, L.P. for the~~ year ~~ended~~amounts ~~December 31,~~due ~~1999,~~to ~~in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States~~rounding.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Irvine, California

January 28, 2000

~~GRAND~~Item ~~COTO~~9. ~~ESTATES,~~Changes ~~L.P.~~ in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

~~(a California limited partnership)~~None.

~~BALANCE~~PART ~~SHEETS~~III

~~December 31,~~Item ~~2000~~10. Directors and ~~2001~~ Executive Officers of the Registrant

	2000			2001
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash	$	51,213		$	36,722
Other assets		48,445			360,544
	$	99,658		$	397,266
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ DEFICIT
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	55,160		$	582,480
Due to general partner		836,207			1,023,262
		891,367			1,605,742
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)
Partners’ deficit		(791,709	)		(1,208,476	)
	$	99,658		$	397,266

The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission no later than June 28, 2003 (the “Proxy Statement”).

~~See~~Item ~~accompanying~~11. ~~notes~~Executive ~~to financial statements.~~ Compensation

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement.


Item 12.	*Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management*

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement.


Item 13.	*Certain Relationships and Related Transactions*

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement.


Item 14.	*Controls and Procedures*

Management of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. recognizes their responsibility for maintaining the effective and efficient internal controls and disclosure controls (the controls and procedures by which the Company ensures that information disclosed in annual and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is accurately processed, summarized and reported within the required time period). The Company has procedures in place for gathering the information that is needed to enable the Company to file required reports with the SEC. The Company has a group of officers who are responsible for reviewing all quarterly and annual SEC reports. This group consists of the Company’s senior management, including its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Audit Committee, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, and selected Division Presidents and Division Chief Financial Officers.

As of February 28, 2003, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO, CFO, COO and CLO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO, CFO, COO and CLO, concluded that the Company’s significant disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 28, 2003. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to February 28, 2003.

PART IV


Item 15.	*Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K*

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

1. Financial Statements. The following Financial Statements, together with the Notes thereto and Reports of Independent Auditors and Public Accountants thereon, are included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

~~GRAND~~Capital ~~COTO~~Pacific ~~ESTATES~~Holdings, LInc.P.

(aReport ~~California~~of ~~limited~~Independent ~~partnership)~~Auditors

~~STATEMENTS~~Report OFof ~~OPERATIONS~~Independent Public Accountants

~~For~~Consolidated ~~the~~Balance ~~Years~~Sheets ~~Ended~~as ~~December~~of February 3128, ~~1999, 2000~~2002 and ~~2001~~2003

		1999			2000			2001
					(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Sales		$	37,557,500		$	2,991		$	—
Cost of sales			28,116,357			(259,449	)		413,887
Gross profit			9,441,143			262,440			(413,887	)
Other expenses (income):
	Selling and marketing		2,650,480			4,800			4,010
	Other income		(18,032	)		—			(1,130	)
Net income (loss)		$	6,808,695		$	257,640		$	(416,767	)

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003

~~See~~Consolidated ~~accompanying~~Statements ~~notes~~of toStockholders’ Equity ~~financial~~for ~~statements.~~the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 28, 2001, 2002 and 2003

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Exhibits


Exhibit
Number			Description

	3	.1	Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2002).
	3	.2	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998).
	4	.1	See the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant (Exhibits 3.1—3.2).
	10	.1	Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Agreement (Non-Qualified). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1999).
	21	.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
	99	.1	Certification of Hadi Makarechian pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	99	.2	Certification of Steven O. Spelman, Jr. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

None.

~~GRAND COTO ESTATES, L.P.~~SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(ad) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Newport Beach, State of California, ~~limited~~on ~~partnership)~~May 28, 2003.

~~STATEMENTS~~CAPITAL OFPACIFIC ~~PARTNERS’~~HOLDINGS, ~~CAPITAL (DEFICIT)~~ INC.

~~For~~By ~~the~~/s/ ~~Years~~HADI ~~Ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001~~ MAKARECHIAN

	IHP
	Investment			Capital Pacific
	Fund I, L.P.			Holdings, LLC			Total
Balance — December 31, 1998		15,350,982			1,455,136			16,806,118
Contributions from partners		7,688,262			2,801,787			10,490,049
Distributions to partners		(27,318,352	)		(7,916,505	)		(35,234,857	)
Net income		3,686,647			3,122,048			6,808,695
Balance — December 31, 1999		(592,461	)		(537,534	)		(1,129,995	)
Contributions from partners		67,602			67,602			135,204
Distributions to partners		—			(54,558	)		(54,558	)
Net income		128,820			128,820			257,640
Balance — December 31, 2000 (unaudited)	$	(396,039	)	$	(395,670	)	$	(791,709	)
Net loss		(208,383	)		(208,384	)		(416,767	)
Balance — December 31, 2001 (unaudited)	$	(604,422	)	$	(604,054	)	$	(1,208,476	)



	Hadi Makarechian
	Chairman of the Board,
	Chief Executive Officer and President

~~See~~Date: ~~accompanying~~May 28, ~~notes to financial statements.~~2003

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Hadi Makarechian and Steven O. Spelman, Jr., and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for each person and in such person’s name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully and to all intents and purposes as such person might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of the powers herein granted.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



Signature	Title	Date

/s/ HADI MAKARECHIAN Hadi Makarechian	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President	May 28, 2003

/s/ STEVEN O. SPELMAN, JR. Steven O. Spelman, Jr.	Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary	May 28, 2003

/s/ KARLHEINZ M. KAISER Karlheinz M. Kaiser	Director	May 28, 2003

/s/ ALLAN L. ACREE Allan L. Acree	Director	May 28, 2003

/s/ WILLIAM J. HADAWAY William J. Hadaway	Director	May 28, 2003

~~GRAND COTO ESTATES, L.P.~~CERTIFICATIONS

(aI, ~~California~~Hadi ~~limited~~Makarechian, ~~partnership)~~certify that:

~~STATEMENTS~~1. I OFhave ~~CASH~~reviewed this ~~FLOWS~~annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc.:

~~For~~2. Based ~~the~~on ~~Years~~my knowledge, ~~Ended~~this ~~December 31~~annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, ~~1999~~in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not ~~2000~~misleading ~~and~~with ~~2001~~respect to the period covered by this annual report;

				1999			2000			2001
							(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)				$	6,808,695		$	257,640		$	(416,767	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities
		Real estate inventories			20,164,994			—			—
		Due from general partner			56,467			—			—
		Other assets			(33,386	)		58,435			(312,099	)
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			(2,651,401	)		(1,242,017	)		527,320
		Due to general partner			176,493			659,714			187,055
			Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		24,521,862			(266,228	)		(14,491	)
Financing Activities
Capital contributions from partner					10,490,049			135,204			—
Capital distributions to partners					(35,234,857	)		(54,558	)		—
			Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(24,744,808	)		80,646			—
Net decrease in cash					(222,946	)		(185,582	)		(14,491	)
Cash — beginning of year					459,741			236,795			51,213
Cash — end of year				$	236,795		$	51,213		$	36,722

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

~~See~~4. The registrant’s ~~accompanying~~other ~~notes~~certifying toofficers ~~financial~~and ~~statements.~~I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


	a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

	b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

	c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


	a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

	b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


	By:	/s/ HADI MAKARECHIAN



	Hadi Makarechian
	Chairman of the Board
	Chief Executive Officer and President
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 28, 2003

~~GRAND~~I, ~~COTO~~Steven ~~ESTATES~~O. Spelman, LJr.P., certify that:

(a1. I ~~California~~have ~~limited~~reviewed this ~~partnership)~~annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc.:

~~NOTES~~2. Based TOon ~~FINANCIAL~~my knowledge, ~~STATEMENTS~~this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

~~December 31~~3. Based on my knowledge, ~~1999~~the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

14. ~~Organization~~The registrant’s other certifying officers and ~~Summary~~I ofare responsible ~~Significant~~for ~~Accounting~~establishing ~~Policies~~and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

~~Organization~~ a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

~~Grand~~5. The registrant’s ~~Coto~~other ~~Estates,~~certifying ~~L.P.,~~officers aand ~~California~~I ~~limited~~have ~~partnership (the “Partnership”)~~disclosed, ~~was~~based ~~formed~~ on ~~October 30,~~ ~~1996~~our inmost ~~accordance~~recent ~~with~~evaluation, ~~the~~to ~~provisions of~~ the ~~laws~~registrant’s ofauditors ~~the State of California for the purpose of developing~~ and ~~selling 93 single-family homes in Coto de Caza, California (~~the ~~“Project”).~~audit ~~The~~committee ~~general partner,~~of ~~Peters~~registrant’s ~~Ranchland~~board ~~Company,~~of ~~Inc.~~directors (~~“Peters”),~~or ~~and~~persons ~~the limited~~performing ~~partner, IHP Investment Fund I, L.P. (“IHP”), each owned a 50% interest in~~ the ~~Partnership~~ atequivalent ~~inception. On October 1, 1997, Peters transferred its interest in the Partnership to Capital Pacific Holdings, LLC (“CPH”~~functions).:

~~The~~a) ~~Partnership~~all ~~Agreement~~significant ~~provides~~deficiencies ~~that~~in ~~cash flows,~~the asdesign ~~defined,~~or ~~are~~operation ~~distributed~~of tointernal controls which could adversely affect the ~~partners~~registrant’s ~~first~~ability to record, inprocess, ~~the amount~~summarize ofand ~~the~~report ~~adjusted~~financial ~~GAAP~~data ~~profit~~and ~~component~~have ~~(as~~identified ~~defined)~~for ~~from~~ the ~~sale~~registrant’s ofauditors ~~each~~any ~~home,~~material weaknesses in ~~accordance~~internal ~~with~~controls; ~~their~~and ~~percentage interests;~~b) ~~second~~any fraud, inwhether ~~satisfaction~~or ofnot ~~unpaid~~material, ~~preferred~~that ~~returns; third,~~involves ~~for~~management ~~payment~~or ofother ~~partners’~~employees ~~capital~~who ~~contributions; fourth,~~have a significant role in ~~accordance~~the ~~with~~registrant’s ~~their~~internal ~~percentage~~controls; ~~interests.~~ and

~~Net income is allocated to the partners in the~~6. The ~~following~~registrant’s ~~order~~other ofcertifying ~~priority:~~officers ~~first,~~and toI ~~recover~~have ~~any net losses~~indicated ~~allocated previously; second, to the extent of and~~ in ~~proportion to~~this ~~the~~annual ~~amount~~report bywhether ~~which~~there ~~cash~~were ~~flow~~significant ~~distributed~~changes in ~~satisfaction of~~ ~~preferred~~internal ~~returns~~controls ~~and~~or ~~the adjusted GAAP profit component (as defined~~ in ~~the~~other ~~partnership~~factors ~~agreement)~~that ~~exceeds~~could ~~previously~~significantly ~~allocated~~affect ~~net~~internal ~~income;~~controls ~~thereafter,~~subsequent ~~in accordance with their percentage interests. Net losses are allocated first,~~ to the ~~general~~ ~~partner~~date upof toour ~~$2,076,921 plus all previously allocated~~most ~~net~~recent ~~income; second~~evaluation, toincluding ~~the~~any ~~limited~~corrective ~~partner~~actions ~~until~~with ~~the limited~~regard ~~partner’s capital account is reduced~~ to ~~zero;~~significant ~~any~~deficiencies ~~remaining losses~~and ~~are~~material ~~allocated to the general partner~~weaknesses.

~~Certain~~By: ~~distributions reflected in the statement of partners’ capital were not in accordance with the provisions of the partnership agreement and it is management’~~/s/ ~~and~~STEVEN ~~the~~O. ~~partners’~~SPELMAN, ~~intent to cumulatively adjust future contributions and distributions of the Partnership to reflect the provisions of the partnership agreement~~JR.

~~The~~Steven ~~partnership~~O. ~~agreement provides~~Spelman, ~~among~~Jr. ~~other things,~~Chief ~~that~~Financial ~~the~~Officer ~~partners~~and ~~shall~~Corporate beSecretary ~~entitled~~(Principal toFinancial ~~receive a preferred return on contributed capital computed using an interest rate equal to prime plus 2%.~~ Officer)

~~Use~~Date: ofMay 28, 2003 ~~Estimates~~

The preparation of the Partnership’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 1999 and revenues and expenses in the period ended December 31, 1999. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates in the near term.

Real Estate Inventories

Real estate inventories include direct and indirect land costs, offsite costs and onsite improvement costs, project commitment fees and builder overhead fees which are capitalized to the real estate project. Selling and marketing costs are expensed as incurred.

The Partnership complies with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of (“SFAS No. 121”). SFAS No. 121 requires the Partnership to review the Project whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the cost basis of such assets may not be recoverable. If the cost basis of the Project is greater than the projected future net cash flows from the Project, an impairment loss is recognized. Impairment losses are calculated as the difference between the Project’s cost basis and its estimated fair value, net of disposal costs on completed units, if any. No impairment losses were recorded in December 31, 1999,

~~GRAND~~EXHIBIT ~~COTO ESTATES, L.P.~~INDEX

(a California limited partnership)


Number
Exhibit			Description

	3	.1	Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2002
	3	.2	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998)
	4	.1	See the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant (Exhibits 3.1—3.2)
	10	.1	Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Agreement (Non-Qualified). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1999)
	21	.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant
	99	.1	Certification of Hadi Makarechian pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	99	.2	Certification of Steven O. Spelman, Jr. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

accordingly, the Project was carried at its historical cost basis. The Partnership sold all of its remaining homes in 1999, therefore, there is no inventory balance as of December 31, 1999.

Sales and Profit Recognition

Sales are recorded and profit is recognized when title has passed to a buyer who has met down payment and continuing investment criteria and substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer. At the time of sale, accumulated costs are relieved from real estate inventories by a method that approximates relative sales value and are charged to cost of sales.

Income Taxes

The Partnership is not a taxable entity and the results of its operations are included in the tax returns of the partners. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes is reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

2. Real Estate Inventories

During 1999, the Project’s remaining 45 homes were sold. At December 31, 1999, included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is $1,155,219 of estimated costs to complete the development of the Project and $141,958 of warranty cost reserves.

3. Related Party Transactions

The partnership agreement provides that a total of $1,579,199 be paid to the general partner in monthly installments for builder overhead fees. If, after all of the homes in the Project are sold, actual sales prices (as defined) are less than budgeted sales prices, the general partner shall be liable to the Partnership for all overhead fees received in excess of 3% of actual gross sales prices (as defined). If actual sales prices are greater than budgeted sales prices, the general partner shall be entitled to receive from the Partnership an amount equal to 3% of actual gross sales prices less overhead fees already received. An additional $394,154 of builder overhead fees was incurred by the Partnership as actual sale prices were greater than budget.

The following fees were paid to the partners and capitalized to the Project during the year ended December 31, 1999:

Commitment fees paid to IHP	$	—
Builder overhead fees paid to CPH		218,920
	$	218,920

4. Commitments and Contingencies

The Partnership’s commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations incurred by real estate developers in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial position.

In the jurisdiction in which the Partnership develops and constructs the Project, community facilities district bonds are issued by government instrumentalities to finance major infrastructure and other improvements. As a land owner benefited by these improvements, the Partnership is responsible for the assessments on its land until the property is sold to buyers. When homes within the Project are sold, the buyers assume the responsibility for the related assessment.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Partners

M.P.E. Partners, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying statements of operations, partners’ capital (deficit) and cash flows of M.P.E. Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership (the “Partnership”), for the year ended December 31, 1999. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of M.P.E. Partners, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Irvine, California

January 28, 2000

M.P.E. PARTNERS, L.P.

(a California limited partnership)

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2000 and 2001

	2000			2001
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash	$	323,102		$	232,466
	$	323,102		$	232,466
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ DEFICIT
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	542,621		$	127,898
Due to partners		471,683			323,290
		1,014,304			451,188
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)
Partners’ deficit		(691,202	)		(218,722	)
	$	323,102		$	232,466

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

M.P.E. PARTNERS, L.P.

(a California limited partnership)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001

		1999		2000			2001
				(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Sales		$	24,345,000	$	—		$	—
Cost of sales			19,039,542		—			(478,095	)
Gross profit			5,305,458		—			478,095
Other expenses:
	Selling and marketing		2,701,810		1,600			5,615
	Other		17,045		—			—
Net income (loss)		$	2,586,603	$	(1,600	)	$	472,480

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

M.P.E. PARTNERS, L.P.

(a California limited partnership)

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (DEFICIT)

For the Years Ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001

	IHP
	Investment			Capital Pacific
	Fund I, L.P.			Holdings, LLC			Total
Balance — December 31, 1998		11,908,276			1,917,752			13,826,028
Contributions from partner		6,149,660			—			6,149,660
Distributions to partners		(21,609,165	)		(1,700,445	)		(23,309,610	)
Net income		1,677,956			908,647			2,586,603
Balance — December 31, 1999		(1,873,273	)		1,125,954			(747,319	)
Contributions from partner		57,717			—			57,717
Net loss		(1,494	)		(106	)		(1,600	)
Balance — December 31, 2000 (unaudited)	$	(1,817,050	)	$	1,125,848		$	(691,202	)
Net income (loss)		915,272			(442,790	)		472,480
Balance — December 31, 2001 (unaudited)	$	(901,778	)	$	683,058		$	(218,722	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

M.P.E. PARTNERS, L.P.

(a California limited partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001

				1999			2000			2001
							(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Operating Activities
Net income (loss)				$	2,586,603		$	(1,600	)	$	472,480
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities
		Receivables and other assets			275,698			2,846			—
		Real estate inventories			16,102,348			—			—
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			(2,042,853	)		(280,767	)		(414,723	)
		Due to partners			346,797			15,748			(148,393	)
			Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		17,268,593			(263,773	)		(90,636	)
Financing Activities
Capital contributions from partners					6,149,660			57,717			—
Capital distributions to partners					(23,309,610	)		—			—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities					(17,159,950	)		57,717			—
Net increase (decrease) in cash					108,643			(206,056	)		(90,636	)
Cash — beginning of period					420,515			529,158			323,102
Cash — end of period				$	529,158		$	323,102		$	232,466

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

M.P.E. PARTNERS, L.P.

(a California limited partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 1999

1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

M.P.E. Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership (the “Partnership”), was formed on March 14, 1997 (inception) in accordance with the provisions of the laws of the State of California for the purpose of developing and selling 51 single-family homes in Tarzana, California (the “Project”). The general partner, Peters Ranchland Company, Inc. (“Peters”), and the limited partner, IHP Investment Fund I, L.P. (“IHP”), each owned a 50% interest in the Partnership at inception. On October 1, 1997, Peters transferred its interest in the Partnership to Capital Pacific Holdings, LLC (“CPH”).

The partnership agreement provides that cash flows, as defined, are distributed to the partners first, in the amount of the adjusted GAAP profit component (as defined) from the sale of each home, in accordance with their percentage interests; second, in satisfaction of unpaid preferred returns; third, for payment of partners’ capital contributions in accordance with their percentage interests; any remaining cash flows are distributed to the partners in accordance with their percentage interests.

Net income is allocated to the partners in the following order of priority: first, to recover any net losses allocated previously; second, to the extent of and in proportion to the amount by which cash flow distributed in satisfaction of preferred returns and the adjusted GAAP profit component (as defined in the partnership agreement) distributed from the sale of each home exceeds previously allocated profits; third, to the extent other cash flows distributed, as defined, exceed previously allocated net income; thereafter, in accordance with their percentage interests. Net losses are allocated first, to the general partner up to $4,063,045 plus all previously allocated net income; second, to the limited partner until the limited partner’s capital account is reduced to zero; any remaining losses are allocated to the general partner.

Certain distributions reflected in the statement of partners’ capital were not in accordance with the provisions of the partnership agreement and it is management’s and the partners’ intent to cumulatively adjust future contributions and distributions of the Partnership to reflect the provisions of the partnership agreement.

The partnership agreement provides, among other things, that the partners shall be entitled to receive a preferred return on contributed capital computed at the rate of prime plus 1%. As of December 31, 1999, the Partnership has unpaid preferred returns of $0 on IHP’s capital contributions, and $307,434 on CPH’s capital contributions.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Partnership’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 1999 and revenues and expenses for the year ended December 31, 1999. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates in the near term.

Real Estate Inventories

Real estate inventories include direct and indirect land costs, offsite costs and onsite improvement costs, project commitment fees and builder overhead fees which are capitalized to the Project. Selling and marketing costs are expensed as incurred.

M.P.E. PARTNERS, L.P.

(a California limited partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

No. 121”). SFAS No. 121 requires the Partnership to review the Project whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the cost basis of the Project may not be recoverable. If the cost basis of the Project is greater than the projected future net cash flows from the Project, an impairment loss is recognized. Impairment losses are calculated as the difference between the Project’s cost basis and its estimated fair value, net of disposal costs on completed units, if any. No impairment losses were recorded in 1999. Accordingly, the Project was carried at its historical cost basis. The Partnership sold all of its remaining homes in 1999, therefore, there is no inventory balance at December 31, 1999.

Sales and Profit Recognition

Sales are recorded and profit is recognized when title has passed to a buyer who has met down payment and continuing investment criteria, and substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer. At the time of sale, accumulated costs are relieved from real estate inventories by a method that approximates relative sales value and are charged to cost of sales.

Income Taxes

2. Real Estate Inventories

During 1999, the Project’s remaining 20 homes were sold. At December 31, 1999, included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is $552,475 of estimated costs to complete the development of the Project and $270,913 of warranty cost reserves.

3. Related Party Transactions

The Partnership acquired the Project on April 11, 1997 from a related party, Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. and two other affiliates (collectively, “CPH, Inc.”), for $12,392,547, utilizing IHP’s initial cash contribution.

CPH, Inc. incurred certain costs in connection with the development of the Partnership’s models and sales office. In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, $2,710,000 was credited to CPH’s capital account relating to these development costs.

The partnership agreement provides that a total of $1,623,655 be paid to the general partner in monthly installments for builder overhead fees. If, after all of the homes in the Project are sold, actual sales prices (as defined) are less than budgeted sales prices, the general partner shall be liable to the Partnership for all overhead fees received in excess of 3% of actual gross sales prices (as defined). If actual sales prices are greater than budgeted sales prices, the general partner shall be entitled to receive from the Partnership an amount equal to 3% of actual gross sales prices less overhead fees already received. An additional $126,725 of builder overhead fees was incurred by the Partnership as actual sale prices were greater than budget.

M.P.E. PARTNERS, L.P.

(a California limited partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following fees were paid to the partners and capitalized to the Project during the year ended December 31, 1999:

Commitment fees paid to IHP	$	—
Builder overhead fees paid to CPH		267,913
	$	267,913

The amounts due to the partners as of December 31, 1999 consist of amounts due to CPH for the payment of builder overhead fees and development fees.

4. Commitments and Contingencies

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On April 4, 2002 the Company filed a report on Form 8-K, regarding a change in the Registrant’s certifying accountant from Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) to Ernst & Young LLP.

The Report of Independent Public Accountants of Andersen on the consolidated financial statements of Capital Pacific Holdings as of February 28, 2001 and February 29, 2000 and for each of the three years in the period ended February 28, 2001 contained no adverse opinions or disclaimers of opinion, nor were such reports qualified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During such periods and through March 29, 2002, (i) there were no disagreements with Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to its satisfaction would have caused it to make reference in connection with its report to the subject matter of the disagreement, and (ii) Andersen has not advised the registrant of any reportable events as defined in paragraph (A) through (D) of Regulation S-K Item 304(a)(1)(v).

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission no later than June 28, 2002 (the “Proxy Statement”).

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement.

PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

1. Financial Statements. The following Financial Statements, together with the Notes thereto and Reports of Independent Auditors and Public Accountants thereon, are included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. Report of Independent Auditors Report of Independent Public Accountants Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 28, 2001 and 2002 Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001 and 2002 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001 and 2002

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 29, 2000 and February 28, 2001 and 2002 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Grand Coto Estates, L.P. Report of Independent Auditors Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) Statements of Partners’ Capital (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) Notes to Financial Statements M.P.E. PARTNERS, L.P. Report of Independent Auditors Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) Statements of Partners’ Capital (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 (unaudited) and 2001 (unaudited) Notes to Financial Statements

2. Exhibits

Exhibit
Number		Description
	3.1	Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.
	3.2	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998).
	4.1	See the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant (Exhibits 3.1 – 3.2).
	10.1	Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Agreement (Non-Qualified). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1999).
	21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
	23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
	23.2	Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

A report on Form 8-K was filed on March 9, 2001, regarding the Interest Exchange Agreement between the Registrant and California Housing Finance, L.P.

A report on Form 8-K was filed on April 4, 2002, regarding a change in the Registrant’s certifying accountant from Arthur Andersen LLP to Ernst & Young LLP.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Newport Beach, State of California, on May 29, 2002.

CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS, INC.

By /s/ HADI MAKARECHIAN

Hadi Makarechian Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: May 29, 2002

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ HADI MAKARECHIAN Hadi Makarechian	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President	May 29, 2002
/s/ STEVEN O. SPELMAN, JR. Steven O. Spelman, Jr.	Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary	May 29, 2002
/s/ KARLHEINZ M. KAISER Karlheinz M. Kaiser	Director	May 29, 2002
/s/ ALLAN L. ACREE Allan L. Acree	Director	May 29, 2002
/s/ WILLIAM J. HADAWAY William J. Hadaway	Director	May 29, 2002

EXHIBIT INDEX

			Sequential
Exhibit			Page
Number		Description	Number
	3.1	Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.
	3.2	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998)
	4.1	See the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant (Exhibits 3.1 – 3.2)
	10.1	Capital Pacific Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Agreement (Non-Qualified). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1999)
	21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
	23.1	Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
	23.2	Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP

Filing Compare · CAPITAL PACIFIC HOLDINGS INC