UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED ~~MARCH~~SEPTEMBER 3130, 2015



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 333-83780

SRA International, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Virginia		54-1013306
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4300 Fair Lakes Court, Fairfax, Virginia		22033
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (703) 803-1500

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ¨ Yes ý No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ý Smaller Reporting Company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.). Yes ¨ No ý

As of ~~May~~November 59, 2015, there were 1,000 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.

SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~MARCH~~SEPTEMBER 3130, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Part I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 (Unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) – Three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2015	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) – Three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) – Three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2015	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) – Three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) – Nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2015	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) – Three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
	Overview	16
	Forward-Looking Statements	1617
	Non-GAAP Financial Measures	18
	Business Environment and Outlook	1819
	Key Metrics	21
	Seasonality	21
	Summary of Financial Results	2321
	Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Operating Results	23
	Results of Operations	23
	Results of Operations	25
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	25
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	28
	Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements	28
	Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements	30
	Description of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	28
	Description of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	30
	Recent Accounting Pronouncements	28
	Recent Accounting Pronouncements	30
	Non-GAAP Metrics	28
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3031
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3132
Part II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3233
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3233
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3233
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3233
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3233
Item 5.	Other Information	3233
Item 6.	Exhibits	3334
Signatures		3435

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	June 30, 2014			March 31, 2015
	June 30, 2015			September 30, 2015
				(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~108~~96,~~840~~009		$	~~143~~68,~~452~~822
Restricted cash	~~1,619~~681			~~681~~636
Accounts receivable, net	~~217~~213,~~677~~915			~~212~~234,~~659~~798
Prepaid expenses and other	57,~~643~~028			97,~~794~~971
Total current assets	~~333~~317,~~779~~633			~~366~~312,~~586~~227
Property and equipment, net	1816,~~925~~449			1724,~~399~~276
Goodwill	~~783~~828,~~604~~929			~~783~~828,~~604~~929
Trade names	150,200			150,200
Identified intangibles, net	~~253~~221,~~916~~039			~~210~~209,~~680~~971
Other long-term assets	3529,~~632~~033			3026,~~709~~981
Total assets	$	1,~~576~~563,~~056~~283		$	1,~~559~~552,~~178~~584
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	~~22,000~~—		$	—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	~~136~~145,~~626~~630			~~148~~141,~~845~~702
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	8382,~~017~~591			7674,~~428~~290
Billings in excess of revenue recognized	10,~~801~~826			89,~~353~~194
Deferred income taxes	56,~~355~~121			43,~~228~~213
Total current liabilities	~~257~~245,~~799~~168			~~237~~228,~~854~~399
Long-term debt	1,~~047~~060,~~927~~160			1,~~059~~060,~~863~~465
Deferred income taxes	~~104~~100,~~941~~763			~~105~~102,~~255~~080
Other long-term liabilities	2418,~~741~~866			2024,~~721~~100
Total liabilities	1,~~435~~424,~~408~~957			1,~~423~~415,~~693~~044
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholder's equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2015	—			—
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015	—			—
Additional paid-in capital	~~522~~526,~~919~~783			~~526~~528,~~292~~391
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax	(116,~~871~~113		)	(74,~~547~~565		)
Accumulated deficit	(~~370~~382,~~400~~344		)	(~~383~~386,~~260~~286		)
Total stockholder's equity	~~140~~138,~~648~~326			~~135~~137,~~485~~540
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity	$	1,~~576~~563,~~056~~283		$	1,~~559~~552,~~178~~584

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

	Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015			~~2014~~			~~2015~~
Revenue	$	~~355~~338,~~930~~614		$	~~349~~351,~~708~~006		$	~~1,039,465~~		$	~~1,030,341~~
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of services	~~276~~255,~~319~~763			~~266~~269,~~861~~849			~~800,506~~			~~786,725~~
Selling, general and administrative	5044,~~004~~929			4647,~~364~~707			~~135,751~~			~~132,646~~
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	2,~~248~~076			21,~~096~~982			~~7,156~~			~~6,170~~
Amortization of intangible assets	1814,~~064~~772			1411,~~351~~068			~~54,647~~			~~43,473~~
Gain on the sale of a portion of the Health & Civil business	—			—			(1,564		)	—
Total operating costs and expenses	317,540			330,606
Total operating costs and expenses	346,635			329,672			996,496			969,014
Operating income	21,074			20,400
Operating income	9,295			20,036			42,969			61,327
Interest expense	(27,274		)	(26,950		)
Interest expense	(25,714		)	(26,222		)	(78,241		)	(80,062		)
Interest income	14			15
Interest income	9			11			43			34
Loss before income taxes	(6,186		)	(6,535		)
Loss before income taxes	(16,410		)	(6,175		)	(35,229		)	(18,701		)
Benefit from income taxes	(2,028		)	(2,593		)
Benefit from income taxes	(7,122		)	(3,516		)	(14,233		)	(5,841		)
Net loss	$	(4,158	)	$	(3,942	)
Net loss	$	(9,288	)	$	(2,659	)	$	(20,996	)	$	(12,860	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

	Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015			~~2014~~			~~2015~~
Net loss	$	(94,~~288~~158	)	$	(23,~~659~~942	)	$	~~(20,996~~	)	$	~~(12,860~~	)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax	~~292~~1,697			1,~~238~~548			~~244~~			~~4,324~~
Comprehensive loss	$	(82,~~996~~461	)	$	(12,~~421~~394	)	$	~~(20,752~~	)	$	~~(8,536~~	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

	Nine months ended March 31,
	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(204,~~996~~158	)	$	(123,~~860~~942	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	82,~~279~~435			62,~~964~~195
Amortization of intangible assets	5414,~~647~~772			4311,~~473~~068
Stock-based compensation	2,~~565~~223			31,~~419~~590
Deferred income taxes	(142,~~819~~513		)	(32,~~604~~577		)
Amortization of original issue discount and debt issuance costs	52,~~563~~045			52,~~276~~014
Gain on the sale of a portion of the Health & Civil business	(1,564		)	—
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effect of acquisitions and divestitures
Accounts receivable	78,~~458~~286			3(21,~~450~~182		)
Prepaid expenses and other	3(2,~~351~~825		)	(~~4,151~~943		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	~~2,046~~(668		)	15(3,~~019~~763		)
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	(54,~~758~~834		)	(68,~~589~~301		)
Billings in excess of revenue recognized	(1,~~712~~506		)	(21,~~448~~632		)
Other	~~7,790~~(509		)	31,~~622~~216
Net cash provided by operating activities	50,274			51,571
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	12,748			(24,257		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(63,~~968~~146		)	(62,~~126~~930		)
Proceeds from the sale of a portion of the Health & Civil business	5,492			—
Net cash used in investing activities	(3,146		)	(2,930		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,476		)	(6,126		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under revolving credit facility	100,000			—
Net cash used in financing activities	—			—
Repayments under revolving credit facility	(100,000		)	—
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	9,602			(27,187		)
Repayments of Term Loan B Facility	—			(10,833		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	108,840			96,009
Net cash used in financing activities	—			(10,833		)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	118,442		$	68,822
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	48,798			34,612
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	5,050			108,840
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	53,848		$	143,452
Supplementary Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest	8320,~~867~~061			6213,~~698~~761
(Refunds received) cash paid for income taxes	(1,304		)	1,575
Cash paid (refunds received) for income taxes	1,107			(162		)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. Basis of Presentation:

SRA International, Inc., a Virginia corporation, or SRA or the Company, was acquired on July 20, 2011 by private equity investment funds, or the PEP Funds, sponsored by Providence Equity Partners L.L.C., or Providence, ~~collectively~~ referred to as the Transaction. SRA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sterling Parent L.L.C., or Sterling Parent, which is wholly-owned by ~~Sterling~~SRA ~~Holdco~~Companies, Inc., or(formerly Sterling Holdco, Inc.), or ~~collectively,~~SRA Companies or the Parent. The Parent was formed by the PEP Funds for the purpose of the Transaction. On August 31, 2015, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement (the "Merger Agreement") to combine its business operations with Computer Science Corporation's (CSC) government services unit, Computer Sciences Government Services (CSGov). The merger is expected to close during the second quarter of fiscal 2016, in conjunction with the separation of CSGov from CSC with CSGov being the surviving entity.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SRA and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures of which we hold a majority interest and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements, which are also prepared in accordance with GAAP, have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. The Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments and reclassifications that are necessary for fair presentation of the periods presented. The results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the ~~full~~year ended June 30, 2016 (fiscal ~~year~~2016). These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 87, ~~2014~~2015.

Nature of Business

~~SRA~~The ~~provides~~Company is a provider of sophisticated information technology and strategic consulting services and solutions primarily to the U.S. federal government ~~organizations~~. The Company provides services and solutions that enable mission performance, improve efficiency of operations, and/or reduce operating costs. The Company's portfolio of customers spans a broad variety of federal agencies and is organized around them into two business groups: National Security group and Health & Civil group.

Operating segments are components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in allocating resources and in assessing performance. Due to the similarities in the types of customers, services and overall economic characteristics of the Company’s two business groups, the Company aggregates all of its operations into one reportable segment.

The Company derives a substantial portion of its revenue from services provided as a prime contractor or subcontractor on engagements with various agencies of the U.S. government. These contracts represented greater than 97% of the Company’s revenue for all periods presented. The Company considers individual agencies that may fall under a larger department as separate customers. No customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenue for any of the periods presented herein.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants. Various valuation approaches can be used to determine fair value, each requiring different valuation inputs. The following hierarchy classifies the inputs used to determine fair value into three levels:


•	Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;


•	Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and


•	Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

The Company did not have any significant non-financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on June 30, ~~2014~~2015 or ~~March~~September 3130, 2015. However, the fair value measurement concepts are applied in determining the fair value of goodwill and intangible assets for the purposes of assessing impairment. The valuation models used in the impairment analysis are based in part on estimated future operating results and cash flows. Because these factors are derived from the Company's estimates and internal ~~market assumptions, they are considered unobservable inputs and the resulting fair value measurements are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.~~

~~The~~market ~~Company’s financial instruments include cash~~assumptions, ~~trade~~they ~~receivables,~~are ~~vendor~~considered ~~payables,~~unobservable ~~debt,~~inputs and ~~derivative financial instruments. As of June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2015,~~ the ~~carrying~~resulting ~~value of cash, trade receivables and vendor payables approximated their~~ fair value. ~~See~~measurements ~~Note~~are 5included ~~for~~in aLevel ~~discussion~~3 of the fair value ~~of the Company’s debt~~hierarchy. ~~See Note 6 for a discussion of the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments.~~

~~Divestiture~~The Company’s financial instruments include cash, trade receivables, vendor payables, debt, and derivative financial instruments. As of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the carrying value of cash, trade receivables and vendor payables approximated their fair value. See Note 5 for a discussion of the fair value of the Company’s debt. See Note 6 for a discussion of the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments.

On July 1, 2013, the Company sold a portion of its Health & Civil business, consisting of six contracts, for approximately $5.5 million. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $1.6 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 as a component of continuing operations. As a result of the divestiture, goodwill and intangible assets were reduced by approximately $4.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company's effective tax rate for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 and 2015 was a tax benefit of 4032.48% and 3139.27%, respectively. The Company's ~~year~~first toquarter ~~date~~ fiscal ~~2014~~2015 effective tax rate was ~~higher~~lower than the statutory income tax rate primarily due to ~~federal~~non-deductible ~~tax~~permanent ~~credits~~items and minimal state taxes. The Company's ~~year~~first toquarter ~~date~~ fiscal ~~2015~~2016 effective tax rate was ~~lower~~higher than the statutory income tax rate primarily as a result of ~~adjusting~~non-deductible ~~tax~~permanent ~~benefits recognized previously in the financial statements and prior year tax returns~~items.

The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, is currently examining the Company’s federal income tax return for fiscal 2011. The IRS has contested a $136.7 million worthless stock deduction of a disposed subsidiary in that period. The Company believes its tax positions are appropriate and is prepared to vigorously defend them.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standard Update, or ASU, 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. This ASU is effective for the Company'’s fiscal ~~2018~~2019. ~~Early application is not permitted.~~ This ASU permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Management is evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by this ASU and the effect that it is expected to have on the Company'’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, ~~the~~FASB ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board~~ issued ASU 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest, which requires the debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. This ASU is effective for the Company’s fiscal 2017. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have ana material impact on the Company'’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. ASU 2015-05 provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The new guidance becomes effective for the Company on July 1, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The Company can elect to adopt ASU 2015-05 prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date or retrospectively. The Company has not yet completed the evaluation of the effect that ASU No. 2015-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

2. Stock-Based Compensation:

Stock Options

The ~~Sterling~~SRA ~~Holdco~~Companies Board of Directors adopted a stock incentive plan in February 2012, amended in December 2012, the 2012 Plan, that authorizes the issuance of up to 61,262 shares of common stock of ~~Sterling~~SRA ~~Holdco~~Companies in the form of options. Under the 2012 Plan, key employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company may be granted a combination of service and performance options. The performance options are considered market-based for accounting purposes. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value the service options and the Monte Carlo or binomial lattice model to value the performance options.

The service options generally vest in five equal installments subject to the option holder’s continued employment or service with the Company. The performance options vest at the time of a change in control based upon a specified level of cash return to the PEP Funds from its investment in the Company. The service and performance options expire 10 years from the date of grant.

The following table summarizes stock option activity for the nine months ended March 31, 2015:

Service Options:
Shares under option at June 30, 2014	26,071
Options granted	1,294
Options forfeited or cancelled	(1,331	)
Shares under option at March 31, 2015	26,034
Options exercisable at March 31, 2015	12,341
Performance Options:
Shares under option at June 30, 2014	25,957
Options granted	1,294
Options forfeited or cancelled	(617	)
Shares under option at March 31, 2015	26,634

The following table summarizes stock option activity for the three months ended September 30, 2015:



Service Options:
Shares under option at June 30, 2015	29,157
Options granted	—
Options forfeited or cancelled	(258	)
Shares under option at September 30, 2015	28,899
Options exercisable at September 30, 2015	20,649

Performance Options:
Shares under option at June 30, 2015	26,601
Options granted	—
Options forfeited or cancelled	(513	)
Shares under option at September 30, 2015	26,088

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Merger will result in the cancellation and settlement of all outstanding vested service options and all outstanding performance options through a combination of cash and CSGov stock, and will result in the conversion of all outstanding unvested service options into unvested options of CSGov of equivalent value.

Restricted Stock

In fiscal 2012, pursuant to the Chief Executive Officer’s, or CEO’s, employment agreement, the CEO was granted 1,000 shares of ~~Sterling~~SRA ~~Holdco~~Companies restricted stock at $1,000 per share. The restricted shares vest 20% per year on each of the first five anniversaries of the CEO’s date of employment with the Company.

In June 2013, the ~~Sterling Holdco~~ Board of Directors approved a restricted stock plan, the Restricted Stock Plan. The Board may award shares of restricted stock under the Restricted Stock Plan, at its discretion, to key employees. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, the number of authorized shares eligible for grant under the Restricted Stock Plan was 19,340 shares of ~~Sterling~~SRA ~~Holdco’s~~Companies common stock.

Vesting of restricted stock awarded under the Restricted Stock Plan is subject to the grantee’s continuous employment with the Company from the grant date to the vesting date. Awards vest over various time periods ranging from zero to 36 months. Vested restricted stock issued under the Restricted Stock Plan remains subject to certain sales and transfer restrictions.

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015:

Nonvested restricted shares of Sterling Holdco at June 30, 2014	12,076
Nonvested restricted shares of SRA Companies at June 30, 2015	10,239
Restricted shares granted	~~1,300~~—
Restricted shares vested	(~~2,517~~310	)
Restricted shares forfeited	(~~395~~550	)
Nonvested restricted shares of Sterling Holdco at March 31, 2015	10,464
Nonvested restricted shares of SRA Companies at September 30, 2015	9,379

Stock Compensation Expense

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to the stock options and restricted stock of $02.42 million and $01.6 million for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 and 2015, respectively~~, and $2~~.~~6 million and $3.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively.~~

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Merger will result in the cancellation and settlement of all outstanding unvested restricted stock through a combination of cash and CSGov stock.

3. Accounts Receivable:

Accounts receivable, net as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2014			March 31, 2015
	June 30, 2015			September 30, 2015
Billed and billable, net of allowance of $957 and $969 as of June 30, 2014 and March 31, 2015, respectively	$	201,427		$	189,969
Billed and billable, net of allowance of $997 and $1,059 as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively	$	199,957		$	222,237
Unbilled:
Retainages	4,~~031~~464			4,~~517~~336
Revenue recorded in excess of milestone billings on fixed-price contracts	126,~~595~~715			119,~~964~~691
Revenue recorded in excess of contractual authorization, billable upon receipt of contractual documents	58,~~184~~764			124,~~611~~640
Allowance for unbillable amounts	(5,~~560~~985		)	(6,~~402~~106		)
Total unbilled	1613,~~250~~958			2212,~~690~~561
Accounts receivable, net	$	~~217~~213,~~677~~915		$	~~212~~234,~~659~~798

The billable receivables included in the billed and billable line item above represent primarily revenue earned in the final month of the reporting period. Consistent with industry practice, certain receivables related to long-term contracts are classified as current, although $2.63 million of retainages are not expected to be billed and collected within one year. The Company’s accounts receivable are primarily from federal government agencies or customers engaged in work for the federal government. The Company believes there is no material credit risk associated with these receivables.

Billings in excess of revenue recognized totaled $10.8 million and $89.42 million at June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, respectively. Billings in excess of the revenue recognized are included in current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

During fiscal 2014, the Company entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement under which the Company sells certain accounts receivable to a third party, or the Factor, without recourse to the Company. The Factor initially pays the Company 90% of the receivable and the remaining price is deferred and based on the amount the Factor receives from the Company's customer. The structure of the transaction provides for a true sale, on a revolving basis, of the receivables transferred. Accordingly, upon transfer of the receivable to the Factor, the receivable is removed from the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet, a loss on the sale is recorded and the deferred price is an account receivable until it is collected. ~~The~~ ~~balance~~During the first quarter of ~~the~~fiscal ~~sold~~2016, ~~receivables~~a ~~may~~portion ~~not~~of ~~exceed~~our ~~$50~~factoring ~~million~~program atwas ~~any~~temporarily ~~time.~~discontinued ~~During~~that ~~the~~was ~~three~~subsequently ~~and~~resumed ~~nine~~after ~~months~~September ~~ended~~30, ~~March~~2015. As of June 30, 2015 and September 3130, ~~2014~~2015, the ~~Company~~balance ~~sold~~of ~~$50.0~~the ~~million~~sold of receivables ~~and~~may ~~recognized~~not aexceed ~~related~~at ~~loss~~any oftime $056.20 million ~~in selling, general~~ and ~~administrative~~$6.0 ~~expenses~~million, respectively. During the ~~three~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~nine~~of ~~months~~fiscal ~~ended March 31~~2016, ~~2015,~~ the Company sold $~~103~~43.40 million ~~and $292.1 million~~ of receivables, ~~respectively,~~ and recognized a related loss of $0.21 million ~~and $0.7 million~~ in selling, general and administrative expenses ~~for the same periods, respectively~~. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, the balance of the sold receivables was $292.5 million, and the related deferred price was $0.3 million.2 As of September 30, 2015, the available unused facility was approximately $3.5 million.

4. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions:

Details of the composition of certain financial statement captions for the periods presented were as follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2014			March 31, 2015
	June 30, 2015			September 30, 2015
Prepaid expenses and other
Taxes and taxes receivable	$	—185		$	~~2,393~~127
Maintenance and software	1,~~575~~270			1,~~884~~331
Rent	~~237~~253			~~269~~309
Other	35,~~831~~320			56,~~248~~204
Total prepaid expenses and other	$	57,~~643~~028		$	97,~~794~~971
Property and equipment
Leasehold improvements	$	2223,~~482~~836		$	2331,~~315~~329
Furniture, equipment and software	3235,~~185~~318			3437,~~657~~607
Total property and equipment	5459,~~667~~154			5768,~~972~~936
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(3542,~~742~~705		)	(4044,~~573~~660		)
Total property and equipment, net	$	1816,~~925~~449		$	1724,~~399~~276
Identified intangibles
Acquired intangible assets	$	~~501~~527,~~699~~099		$	~~501~~527,~~699~~099
Software development costs	23,~~930~~167			3,167
Total identified intangibles	~~504~~530,~~629~~266			~~504~~530,~~866~~266
Less: Accumulated amortization	(~~250~~309,~~713~~227		)	(~~294~~320,~~186~~295		)
Total identified intangibles, net	$	~~253~~221,~~916~~039		$	~~210~~209,~~680~~971
Other long-term assets
Debt issuance costs, net	$	3125,~~566~~397		$	2723,~~059~~688
Other	43,~~066~~636			3,~~650~~293
Total other long-term assets	$	3529,~~632~~033		$	3026,~~709~~981
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Vendor obligations	$	8698,~~658~~708		$	8885,~~465~~867
Accrued interest	2324,~~215~~603			35,~~273~~755
Interest rate derivative liability	107,~~729~~637			7,~~848~~472
Facility exit charge	86,~~173~~667			5,~~405~~145
Other	78,~~851~~015			117,~~854~~463
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	~~136~~145,~~626~~630		$	~~148~~141,~~845~~702
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
Accrued salaries and incentive compensation	$	3539,~~195~~936		$	3729,~~979~~883
Accrued leave	3330,~~694~~286			3028,~~399~~918
Other	14,128			8,050
Accrued 401(k) match	5,797			8,910
Total accrued payroll and employee benefits	$	83,017		$	76,428
Other	6,572			6,579
Total accrued payroll and employee benefits	$	82,591		$	74,290
Other long-term liabilities
Interest rate derivative liability	$	82,~~803~~369		$	~~4,571~~—
Deferred rent	912,~~433~~378			1120,~~233~~752
Facility exit charge	54,~~193~~119			43,~~917~~348
Other	1,312			—
Total other long-term liabilities	$	18,866		$	24,100
Total other long-term liabilities	$	24,741		$	20,721

5. Debt:

On July 20, 2011, in connection with the Transaction, the Company (i) entered into senior secured credit facilities, consisting of an $875.0 million Term Loan B Facility and a $100.0 million Revolver, or the Credit Agreement, and (ii) issued $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11% Senior Notes due 2019. The Term Loan B Facility was issued at a discount of $8.75 million.

At June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2014			March 31, 2015
	June 30, 2015			September 30, 2015
Secured Term Loan B Facility	$	~~675~~664,~~000~~167		$	664,167
Less: Unamortized discount	(54,~~073~~007		)	(43,~~304~~702		)
Secured Term Loan B Facility, net	~~669~~660,~~927~~160			~~659~~660,~~863~~465
Senior Notes due 2019 at 11%	400,000			400,000
Total debt	1,~~069~~060,~~927~~160			1,~~059~~060,~~863~~465
Current portion of long-term debt	~~(22,000~~—		)	—
Long-term debt	$	1,~~047~~060,~~927~~160		$	1,~~059~~060,~~863~~465

As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, the estimated fair value of the Company’s outstanding debt was approximately $1,~~092~~088.32 million. The estimated fair value of this outstanding debt was determined based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets (Level 2 inputs).

The senior secured credit facilities and the indenture governing the Senior Notes issued in connection with the Transaction limit the Company’s ability to incur certain additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase capital stock, make certain investments, enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates, use assets as security in other transactions, and sell certain assets.

The Company is required to meet a net senior secured leverage ratio, or NSSLR, covenant quarterly if any revolving loan, swing-line loan or letter of credit is outstanding on the last day of the quarter. The Company had no outstanding debt, letters of credit or borrowings on its Revolver as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~March~~September 3130, 2015. If the Company had any borrowings on its Revolver, it would have been required to maintain a NSSLR of less than or equal to 4.5x as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015. The ratio is calculated as the consolidated net secured indebtedness as of the last day of the quarter (defined as the consolidated net debt secured by any lien minus any cash and permitted investments) to the preceding four quarters’ consolidated EBITDA, ~~excluding the impact of acquisition made subsequent to the reporting period~~ (as defined in the Credit Agreement). ~~See Note 10 for the discussion of the acquisition.~~ The Company’s NSSLR was 32.2x9x as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and 23.9x1x as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants.

See Note 10 for discussion regarding the notice of conditional redemption of the Senior Notes.

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

Borrowings under the senior secured credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, with a 1.25% floor, or, at the Company’s option, an applicable margin plus an alternative base rate determined by reference to the higher of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, with a 2.25% floor. In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the senior secured credit facilities, the Company pays a per annum commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the revolving credit facility and customary administrative fees. The senior secured credit facilities are guaranteed by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries and by Sterling Parent. The Term Loan B Facility matures in July 2018 and the Revolver matures in July 2016.

In addition, the senior secured credit facilities require the Company to prepay outstanding term loans, subject to certain exceptions, in the case of excess cash flow, or ECF, and in the event of certain asset sales, condemnation events and issuances of debt. The Company is required to make annual payments equal to 50% of ECF based upon achievement of a net senior secured leverage ratio, or NSSLR, between 2.75x and 3.5x. The required annual payments adjust to 75% of ECF when NSSLR is greater than 3.5x, 25% of ECF when NSSLR is between 2x and 2.75x, and zero if NSSLR is less than 2x. Any required ECF payments are due in October each year, subject to acceptance by the lenders. The Company repaid $140.0 million of its Term Loan B Facility in fiscal 2012, which satisfied all of the Company’s required quarterly principal payments and required ECF principal payments for fiscal 2012. The Company repaid $20.0 million of its Term Loan B Facility in fiscal 2013, which satisfied the Company’s required ECF principal payments for fiscal 2013. The Company's fiscal 2014 ECF requirement was $61.5 million, of which the Company repaid $40.0 million during fiscal 2014. The remainder was tendered as payment in October 2014, of which $10.6 ~~million was declined by the lenders and returned to the Company, as permitted by the facility.~~

~~The $8.75~~ million ~~Term~~was ~~Loan~~declined Bby ~~Facility original issue discount is being amortized to interest expense using~~ the ~~effective~~lenders ~~interest method~~ and ~~added~~returned to the ~~recorded~~Company, ~~debt~~as ~~amount~~permitted ~~over~~by the ~~seven-year term of the loan~~facility. ~~During~~No ~~the~~amount ~~three~~was ~~months~~due ~~ended~~in ~~March 31,~~October ~~2014 and~~ 2015 ~~and~~based on the ~~nine~~terms ~~months ended March 31, 2014 and 2015, $0.3 million, $0.2 million, $0.9 million and $0.8 million~~ of the ~~original issue discount were amortized and reflected in interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations, respectively~~agreement.

~~Costs~~The ~~incurred~~$8.75 inmillion ~~connection~~Term ~~with~~Loan ~~the~~B ~~issuance~~Facility oforiginal ~~the~~issue ~~debt~~discount ~~are~~is being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method ~~over~~and ~~the~~added ~~life~~to of the ~~related~~recorded debt ~~and~~amount ~~accelerated~~over to the ~~extent~~seven-year ~~that~~term ~~any~~of ~~repayment~~the ~~is made~~loan. During ~~the~~each ~~three~~of ~~months ended March 31, 2014 and 2015 and~~ the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 and 2015, $10.53 million, ~~$1.4~~of ~~million,~~the ~~$4.7~~original ~~million~~issue ~~and~~discount ~~$4.5 million of costs~~ were amortized and reflected in interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations~~, respectively~~.

AsCosts ofincurred ~~March 31,~~in ~~2015,~~connection ~~interest~~with ~~accrued~~the atissuance ~~a rate~~ of ~~6.5% for~~ the ~~senior~~debt ~~secured~~are ~~credit~~amortized ~~facilities.~~using ~~Interest~~the ~~payments~~effective ofinterest ~~$11.6~~method ~~million~~over ~~and~~the ~~$3.8~~life ~~million~~of ~~were made in~~ the ~~three~~related ~~months~~debt ~~ended March 31, 2014~~ and ~~2015,~~accelerated ~~respectively,~~to ~~including~~the ~~$0.2~~extent ~~million~~that ~~and~~any ~~$0.2~~repayment ~~million~~is ~~of commitment fees for the same periods~~made. ~~Interest~~During ~~payments~~each of ~~$36.4~~the ~~million and $34.0 million were made in~~ the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 and 2015, ~~respectively, including~~ $01.67 million ~~and~~of ~~$0.5~~costs ~~million~~were ofamortized ~~commitment~~and ~~fees~~reflected ~~for~~in interest expense in the ~~same~~condensed ~~periods.~~consolidated statements of operations.

As of September 30, 2015, interest accrued at a rate of 6.5% for the senior secured credit facilities. Interest payments of $18.9 million and $10.9 million were made in the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, including $0.2 million and $0.2 million of commitment fees for the same periods.

Senior Notes due 2019

The Senior Notes due 2019 are guaranteed by ~~all of the Company~~SRA’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. ~~The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. Each of the subsidiary guarantors are 100% owned by the Company and have no independent assets or operations.~~

Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually. The Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at the ~~option of the Company, at varying~~ redemption prices ~~that~~set ~~generally~~forth ~~include~~in ~~premiums.~~the Asindenture ofgoverning ~~March 31, 2015, interest accrued at 11.0% for~~ the Senior Notes., ~~The~~including ~~Company~~a ~~paid~~redemption ~~$22.0~~price ~~million~~of ~~and $44~~105.05% ~~million~~during ~~of interest related to~~ the ~~Senior~~twelve-month ~~Notes~~period inbeginning ~~the~~on ~~three and nine months ended March~~October 311, ~~2014.~~2015, ~~The~~plus ~~Company~~accrued ~~paid zero~~ and ~~$22.0~~unpaid ~~million of~~ interest, ~~related~~if any, to the ~~Senior~~redemption ~~Notes in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015~~date.

As of September 30, 2015, interest accrued at 11.0% for the Senior Notes.

See Note 10 for discussion regarding the notice of conditional redemption of the Senior Notes.

6. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:

Hedge of Interest Rate Risk

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk related to its Term Loan B Facility.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. As of both June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, the Company had outstanding interest rate derivatives with a combined notional value of $~~565.0 million and $~~500.0 million, ~~respectively,~~ which were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk. The interest rate swap derivatives decrease over time to a notional value of $475.0 million upon maturity in July 2016.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, or AOCI, net of taxes, and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. Amounts reported in AOCI related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that approximately $64.36 million will be reclassified from AOCI into earnings.

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

The fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments, determined using Level 2 inputs (see Note 1), was $1910.50 million and $127.45 million as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, respectively. The current portion is included in the accounts payable and accrued expenses and the long-term portion is included in other long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company utilizes a third-party pricing service to assist with determining the fair values for its interest rate swaps. The Company performs procedures to corroborate the values provided by the pricing service including regular discussions to understand

the pricing service’s methodology and a review of the service provider’s Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16, or SSAE 16, report.

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations & Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

All amounts recorded in other comprehensive loss are related to the Company’s derivatives. The following table represents a rollforward of amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, including the reclassifications out of the accumulated other comprehensive loss to the condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

Nine months ended March 31,

Three months ended September 30,

2014

2015

~~2014~~

~~2015~~

Beginning of period

(1211,~~231~~871

)

(86,~~785~~113

)

~~(12,183~~

)

~~(11,871~~

)

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications

Total before tax

(~~635~~59

)

(~~619~~182

)

~~(3,047~~

)

~~(1,108~~

)

Tax effect

~~249~~23

~~243~~71

~~1,195~~

~~435~~

Net of tax

(~~386~~36

)

(~~376~~111

)

~~(1,852~~

)

~~(673~~

)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss

Total before tax

12,~~116~~851

2,~~656~~715

~~3,449~~

~~8,222~~

Tax effect

(~~438~~1,118

)

(1,~~042~~056

)

~~(1,353~~

)

~~(3,225~~

)

Net of tax

~~678~~1,733

1,~~614~~659

~~2,096~~

~~4,997~~

Net other comprehensive income

~~292~~1,697

1,~~238~~548

~~244~~

~~4,324~~

End of period

(1110,~~939~~174

)

(74,~~547~~565

)

~~(11,939~~

)

~~(7,547~~

)

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features

The Company has agreements with each of its interest rate swap counterparties that contain a provision providing that the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the Company's default on the indebtedness.

If the Company had breached any of the provisions of the agreements at ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at an estimated termination value. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, the termination value of the interest rate swaps in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements, was $1510.54 million. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, the Company was not in breach of any of the provisions nor posted any collateral related to these agreements.

7. Commitments and Contingencies:

Government Contracting

The Company is subject to investigations and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations. U.S. Government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency, or DCAA, and the Defense Contract Management Agency, or DCMA, routinely audit and review a contractor’s performance on government contracts; accounting, estimating, and other management internal control systems; indirect rates and pricing practices; and compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards, including U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards.

In November 2013, DCMA issued a report that deemed the Company’s accounting system acceptable. Any future adverse audit findings or failure to obtain an “adequate” determination of the Company’s various accounting, estimating, and other management internal control systems from the responsible U.S. government agency could significantly and adversely affect its business, including its ability to bid on new contracts and its competitive position in the bidding process. The government may also decrement billings until cited deficiencies are corrected and a follow-up review has been performed by DCAA confirming corrective actions are adequate.

The DCAA has not completed audits of the Company’s incurred cost submissions for fiscal 2009 and subsequent fiscal years. The Company has recorded financial results subsequent to fiscal 2008 based upon costs that the Company believes will be approved upon final audit or review. If incurred cost audits result in adverse findings that exceed the Company’s estimates, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Litigation

The Company is subject to investigations, audits and reviews relating to compliance with various laws and regulations with respect to its role as a contractor to agencies and departments of the U.S. Government, state, local, and foreign governments, and otherwise in connection with performing services in countries outside of the United States. Such matters can lead to criminal, civil or administrative proceedings and the Company could be faced with penalties, fines, payments or compensatory damages. Adverse findings could also have a material adverse effect on the Company because of its reliance on government contracts. The Company is subject to periodic audits by state, local, and foreign governments for taxes. The Company is also involved in various claims, arbitrations and lawsuits arising in the normal conduct of its business, including but not limited to bid protests, various employment litigation matters, contractual disputes and charges before administrative agencies. Although the Company can give no assurance, based upon its evaluation and taking into account the advice of legal counsel, the Company does not believe that the outcome of any such matter would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

8. Facility Exit Costs:

Periodically the Company initiates activities to consolidate and exit certain underutilized leased facilities as well as sublease excess space. The Company exited underutilized office space in several of its leased facilities and recognized total facility exit charges of $8.1 ~~million and $8~~.64 million during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014~~, respectively~~. During the three months ended ~~March 31~~September 30, 2015, the Company recognized facility exit charges of $~~3.9 million including $~~0.92 million ~~related to less favorable sublease assumptions. During the nine months ended March 31~~, ~~2015, the Company recognized facility exit charges of $4.8 million,~~ offset by a reduction in the facility exit charge of $10.59 million due to ~~negotiating~~additional ~~more~~space ~~favorable~~needed ~~sublease~~for ~~terms~~a ~~than~~previously ~~were~~darkened ~~previously~~facility ~~estimated~~as a result of newly awarded contract. Future lease payments will continue to be made through the end of the lease terms, with the latest expiring in fiscal 2026.

In determining the fair value of the facility exit charges, the Company made estimates related to potential sublease income and future exit costs. If the actual amounts differ from the Company’s estimates, the amount of the facility exit charges could be impacted.

The following is a summary of the accrued facility exit charge (in thousands). The current portion is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and the long-term portion is included in other long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Balance as of June 30, 2014	$	13,366
Balance as of June 30, 2015	$	10,786
Facility exit costs accrued, net	~~3,304~~(627		)
Cash payments	(51,~~931~~616		)
Other	(~~417~~50		)
Balance as of March 31, 2015	10,322
Balance as of September 30, 2015	8,493
Current portion of facility exit charge liability	(5,~~405~~145		)
Long-term facility exit charge liability	$	43,~~917~~348

9. Related Party Transactions:

In ~~accordance~~connection with the Transaction, SRA entered into an agreement with Providence under which Providence provides the Company with advisory, consulting, and other services for which the Company pays Providence an annual management fee. In addition to the management fee, the Company is responsible for expenses incurred by Providence in connection with its performance of ~~oversight~~these services. The Company incurred $0.~~4 million and $0.~~5 million in management fees and expenses for ~~the~~each ~~three~~of ~~months ended March 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and $1.3 million and $1.4 million for~~ the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 and 2015~~, respectively~~.

From time to time, and in the ordinary course of business, the Company purchases goods and services from other Providence portfolio companies. Costs associated with these related party transactions for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 and 2015 were $21.4 million and $43.03 million, respectively~~, and $4~~.~~7 million and $7.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively.~~

15As of June 30, 2015, there were no amounts due from related parties and $1.2 million due to related parties, which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2015, there were no amounts due from related parties and $0.2 million due to related parties, which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

As of June 30, 2014, there were no amounts due from related parties and $0.6 million due to related parties, which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of March 31, 2015, there were no amounts due from related parties and $0.2 million due to related parties, which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

10. Subsequent Events:

~~On April~~ 15, 2015, the Company completed an asset purchase of substantially all of the Government Services business from Qbase LLC for $72.0 million. The acquired Qbase Government Services business delivers IT support solutions and professional services to help enable the U.S. government's missions focused on health, IT, homeland security and law enforcement. The acquisition was financed with cash on hand. The asset purchase agreement contains customary representations and warranties and requires Qbase and certain controlling stockholders to indemnify the Company for certain contingent liabilities for which an escrow fund of $5.4 million was established. The Company expects to complete the purchase price allocation in the fourth quarter.

During October 2015, the Company borrowed $30.0 million under its Revolver for operational use which was subsequently repaid.

On October 19, 2015 the Company announced its intention to redeem all of its outstanding 11% Senior Notes due 2019. The redemption of the Notes is subject to the satisfaction of specified conditions, including the consummation of the previously announced combination of the Company with CSGov on or prior to the redemption date.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The discussion and analysis that follows is organized to:

•provide an overview of our business;

•describe selected key metrics evaluated by management;

•explain the year-over-year trends in our results of operations;

•describe our liquidity and capital resources; and

•explain our critical accounting policies and estimates.

Readers who are not familiar with our company or the financial statements of federal government information technology, or IT, service providers should closely review the "Description of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates," and the "Description of Statement of Operations Items," sections included in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2014. These sections provide background information that can help readers understand and analyze our financial information.

Overview

WeSRA ~~are~~is a leading provider of ~~technology~~sophisticated IT and ~~strategic~~professional ~~consulting~~ services ~~and solutions primarily~~ to the U.S. federal government ~~organizations~~. ~~Founded~~SRA’s inservices ~~1978,~~help weits ~~are~~government ~~dedicated~~customers toaddress ~~solving~~ complex ~~mission~~IT ~~and~~needs ~~efficiency~~in ~~challenges~~order ~~for~~to ~~our~~achieve ~~customers~~their bymissions ~~providing~~more ITeffectively, ~~solutions~~while ~~and~~also ~~professional~~increasing ~~services~~efficiency ~~that~~and ~~enable~~reducing ~~mission~~expenses. ~~performance,~~During ~~improve~~fiscal ~~efficiency~~2015 ofapproximately ~~operations~~70% orof ~~reduce~~SRA’s ~~operating~~revenue ~~costs.~~is ~~Our~~derived from IT service offerings, ~~include~~including ~~infrastructure~~software ~~services,~~and ~~software~~systems development, ~~systems~~network ~~integration,~~infrastructure ~~cybersecurity,~~and cloud ~~computing~~services, ~~business~~and ~~intelligence~~cybersecurity, ~~data~~with ~~analytics~~the ~~and~~remaining ~~mobile~~30% ~~solutions.~~derived Wefrom ~~also provide mission~~domain-specific ~~domain~~professional ~~expertise~~services in areas such as intelligence analysis, ~~energy~~bioinformatics and ~~environmental~~health ~~consulting~~sciences, ~~enterprise~~energy ~~logistics~~ and ~~bioinformatics.~~environmental ~~We currently serve more than 200 federal government organizations~~consulting, ~~across National Security~~ and ~~Health~~enterprise &planning ~~Civil markets, many of which we have served for over 20 years. Revenue from the federal government represented greater than 97% for all periods presented. Our revenue~~ and ~~Adjusted~~resource ~~EBITDA (as calculated in accordance with our credit agreement) were $349~~management.7 ~~million~~SRA’s ~~and~~business ~~$47.2~~has ~~million~~an ~~for~~attractive ~~the~~operating ~~three~~model, ~~months~~characterized ~~ended~~by ~~March 31,~~recurring ~~2015~~revenues, ~~respectively,~~diverse ~~and~~multi-year $1contracts,~~030.3~~ ~~million~~ and ~~$140.7~~strong ~~million~~free ~~for~~cash ~~the~~flow ~~nine months ended March 31, 2015, respectively~~conversion. ~~For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, see the section entitled “Items Affecting the Comparability of our Operating Results.”~~

~~Forward~~SRA believes that the large size of its addressable market and its focus on higher growth areas of the market provide it with ample opportunities to grow. SRA estimates, based in part on data from the FPDS, that the U.S. federal government spent approximately $125 billion in government fiscal year 2014 with third parties on the types of IT and professional services that SRA provides, which SRA refers to as its addressable market. Within its addressable market, SRA generated approximately 78% of its revenue in fiscal 2015 from the health, civil, intelligence, homeland security, and law enforcement end markets. According to IDC spending by the federal government in the health and civil IT markets is forecasted to grow 5.1% annually from government fiscal year 2014 to 2019, which compares to a forecasted CAGR of 0.5% for spending in the federal DoD IT markets over the same period. In addition, SRA generated approximately 22% of its revenue in fiscal 2015 from the defense end market, where it focus on technically complex IT services with long-~~Looking~~term ~~Statements~~demand drivers, such as cybersecurity, mobility, big data, data center optimization, common networking infrastructure, cloud and supporting applications. More than half of SRA’s fiscal 2015 revenue from the defense end market came from services areas such as joint operations and other Unified Combatant Commands. According to IDC, these services areas of the federal DoD IT market make up more than a third of the entire federal DoD IT market and are forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 3.6% from government fiscal year 2014 to 2019. Less than 2% of SRA’s fiscal 2015 revenue was derived from the declining portion of the defense end market tied to OCO funding.

~~Some~~In ofaddition ~~the~~to ~~statements~~focusing ~~under~~on ~~“Management’s~~attractive ~~Discussion~~ and ~~Analysis~~growing segments of ~~Financial~~its ~~Condition~~addressable ~~and~~market, ~~Results~~SRA ofhas ~~Operations”~~invested ~~and elsewhere~~ in ~~this~~business ~~quarterly~~development ~~report~~capabilities onthat ~~Form~~it ~~10-Q~~believes ~~constitute~~will ~~forward-looking~~enable ~~statements~~it ~~within~~to ~~the~~continue ~~meaning~~to ofgrow ~~The~~its ~~Private~~market ~~Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995~~share. ~~These~~From ~~statements~~2011 ~~involve~~through ~~known and unknown risks~~2015, ~~uncertainties~~SRA ~~and~~has ~~other~~nearly ~~factors~~doubled ~~that~~headcount ~~may~~in ~~cause~~its ~~our~~business ~~actual~~development ~~results~~functions, ~~levels~~while ofalso ~~activity,~~reorganizing ~~performance~~its orresources ~~achievements~~ to bemore ~~materially~~effectively ~~different~~pursue ~~from~~and ~~any~~win ~~future~~new ~~results,~~business ~~levels~~in ofits ~~activity,~~target ~~performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements~~markets. InThrough ~~some cases, you can identify~~ these ~~statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate~~efforts,” ~~“believe,”~~SRA ~~“could,”~~increased ~~“estimate,”~~the ~~“expect,”~~volume ~~“intend,”~~of ~~“may,”~~new ~~“plan,”~~contract ~~“potential,”~~opportunities ~~“should,”~~for ~~“will,”~~which ~~and~~it ~~“would”~~submitted orbids ~~similar~~from ~~words~~$2.2 ~~You~~billion ~~should~~in ~~read~~fiscal ~~statements~~2011 ~~that~~to ~~contain~~$6.1 ~~these~~billion ~~words~~in ~~carefully~~fiscal ~~because~~2015. ~~they~~SRA ~~discuss~~has ~~our~~also ~~future~~enhanced ~~expectations,~~the ~~contain~~quality ~~projections~~ of ~~our~~its ~~future~~business ~~results~~development ofprocess ~~operations~~by oridentifying ofand ~~our~~pursuing ~~financial~~new ~~position,~~business oropportunities ~~state~~earlier ~~other~~and ~~forward-looking~~focusing ~~information.~~on Wecontracts ~~believe~~where ~~that~~its itservices isare ~~important~~differentiated tofrom ~~communicate~~its ~~our~~competitors. ~~future~~As ~~expectations~~a ~~to our investors. However~~result, ~~there~~SRA ~~may~~has bemaintained ~~events~~stable innew ~~the~~business ~~future~~win ~~that~~rates ~~we are not able to predict accurately or control. The factors listed~~ in ~~the~~both ~~“Risk~~fiscal ~~Factors”~~2014 ~~section~~and offiscal ~~our~~2015 ~~annual~~and ~~report~~increased onnew ~~Form~~business ~~10-K~~contract ~~filed~~wins ~~with~~from ~~the~~$334 ~~Securities~~million ~~and~~in ~~Exchange~~fiscal ~~Commission,~~2012 orto ~~SEC,~~$542 onmillion ~~August~~in 8,fiscal 2015.

SRA’s revenue is diversified across more than 900 unique contracts, with no single government agency representing more than 10% of revenue and no single contract representing more than 5% of revenue for fiscal 2015. Moreover, SRA has an attractive mix of contract types with approximately 73% and 72% of its revenue in fiscal 2015 and the three months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, generated from fixed-price or time-and-materials contracts, which typically generate higher margins than cost-plus-fee contracts.

SRA’s attractive business model consists of multi-year contracts with high revenue visibility, attractive margins, and strong free cash flow conversion. SRA typically serves its customers under long-term contracts that span three to seven years, and SRA has served many of its customers for more than 20 years. SRA’s long-term contracts and relationships provide it with high revenue visibility, with average contract lengths of approximately five years as of June 30, 2015. Further, SRA’s $3.8 billion of total backlog September 30, 2015, provides it with a base of future revenues supported by existing contracts. In addition, with capital expenditures of less than 1% of revenue and low working capital requirements, SRA has historically had strong free cash flow conversion, allowing it to generate approximately $385 million of cash available for debt reduction or acquisitions since the Providence Acquisition in July 2011.

~~2014~~SRA directs substantial resources towards recruiting, training and ~~this~~ ~~quarterly~~promoting ~~report~~its employees and fosters a high-performance culture throughout its organization. SRA’s culture is based on ~~Form~~a 10set of core principles that have defined its business throughout SRA’s nearly 40-Q,year ~~provide~~history: ~~some~~integrity, ~~but~~quality ~~not~~work ~~all,~~for ~~possible~~its ~~examples~~customers, ofemployee ~~risks~~satisfaction, ~~uncertainties~~and service to its country and ~~events~~communities. SRA believes that ~~may~~its ~~cause~~emphasis ~~our~~on ~~actual~~developing ~~results~~and tomaintaining ~~differ~~a ~~materially~~high-performance ~~from~~team ~~the~~and ~~expectations~~culture webased ~~describe~~on inSRA’s ~~our~~foundational ~~forward~~ethic of Honesty and Service® is a key competitive strength, helping to ensure SRA efficiently delivers consistent, high-~~looking~~quality ~~statements~~work for its customers.

On August 31, 2015, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement to combine our business operation with Computer Science Corporation's (CSC) government services unit, Computer Sciences Government Services (CSGov). The merger is expected to close during the second quarter of fiscal 2016, in conjunction with the separation of CSGov from CSC with CSGov being the surviving entity.

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “should,” “will,” and “would” or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our future expectations, contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial position, or state other forward-looking information. We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our investors. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to predict accurately or control. The factors listed in the “Risk Factors” section of our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on August 7, 2015 and this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, provide some, but not all, possible examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements.

Factors or risks that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results we anticipate include, but are not limited to:

• ~~reduced~~failure ~~spending~~to ~~levels~~consummate ~~and~~our ~~changing~~combination ~~budget~~with ~~priorities~~CSGov ofon ~~our~~a ~~largest~~timely ~~customer~~basis, ~~the~~or ~~United~~at ~~States federal government~~all, which ~~accounts~~is ~~for~~a ~~greater~~condition ~~than~~to ~~97%~~our redemption of ~~our~~the ~~revenue~~Senior Notes;

• ~~failure~~reduced ofspending ~~our~~levels ~~customer~~and tochanging ~~fund~~budget apriorities ~~contract~~of orour ~~exercise~~largest ~~options~~customer, tothe ~~extend~~United ~~contracts~~States federal government, orwhich ~~our~~accounted ~~inability~~for tomore ~~successfully~~than ~~execute~~97% ~~awarded~~of ~~contracts~~our orrevenue ~~otherwise~~in ~~convert~~the ~~our~~first ~~backlog~~quarter ~~into~~of ~~revenue~~fiscal 2016;

• ~~automatic~~failure ~~across-the-board~~of ~~spending~~our ~~cuts~~customers to ~~civil~~fund ~~and~~a ~~defense~~contract ~~programs~~or asexercise aoptions ~~result~~to ofextend ~~the 2011 sequester~~contracts, ~~the~~or ~~2013~~our ~~government~~inability ~~shutdowns~~to orsuccessfully ~~other~~execute ~~budget~~awarded ~~constraints~~contracts;

• ~~limitations~~failure asto aconvert ~~result of~~ our ~~substantial~~backlog ~~indebtedness~~into ~~which~~revenue ~~could~~and ~~adversely~~the ~~affect~~timing of our ~~financial~~receipt ~~health,~~of ~~operational~~revenue ~~flexibility~~under ~~and~~contracts ~~strategic~~included ~~plans~~in backlog;


•	changes in estimates used in recognizing revenue;


•	our ability to generate revenue under certain of our contracts;


•	our ability to successfully implement our growth strategy;


•	future spending cuts to civil and defense programs as a result of sequestration, government shutdowns, or other budget constraints;


•	failure to maintain strong relationships with government entities and agencies and other contractors and subcontractors;


•	limitations as a result of our substantial indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial health, operational flexibility, and strategic plans;


•	failure to generate cash sufficient to pay the principal of, interest on, or other amounts due on our debt;

• failure to comply with complex laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the False Claims Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, or FAR, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and the U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards;

• possible delays or overturning of our government contract awards due to bid protests, loss of contract revenue or diminished opportunities based on the existence of organizational conflicts of interest or failure to perform by other companies on which we depend to deliver products and services;17

• ~~security~~possible ~~threats,~~delays ~~attacks~~ or ~~other~~overturning ~~disruptions~~of on our ~~information~~government ~~infrastructure,~~contract ~~and~~awards ~~failure~~due to ~~comply~~bid ~~with~~protests, ~~complex~~loss ~~network~~of ~~security~~contract ~~and~~revenue, ~~data~~or ~~privacy~~diminished ~~legal~~opportunities ~~and~~based ~~contractual~~on ~~obligations~~the existence of organizational conflicts of interest or failure to ~~protect~~perform ~~sensitive~~by ~~information~~other companies on which we depend to deliver products and services;

• ~~inability~~security threats, attacks, or other disruptions to our information infrastructure, or failure to ~~adequately~~comply ~~protect~~with ~~our~~complex ~~proprietary~~network ~~information~~security, data privacy or ~~intellectual~~legal ~~property~~and ~~rights~~contractual obligations, or ~~violation~~the offailure ~~third~~to ~~party~~protect ~~intellectual~~sensitive ~~rights~~information;

• ~~potential~~inability ~~for significant economic~~ or ~~personal~~failure ~~liabilities~~to ~~resulting~~adequately ~~from~~protect ~~failures,~~our ~~errors,~~proprietary ~~delays~~information or ~~defects~~intellectual ~~associated~~property ~~with~~rights ~~products,~~or ~~services~~violation ~~and~~of ~~systems~~third-party weintellectual ~~supply including risks associated with work performed through joint venture arrangements~~rights;


•	potential for significant economic or personal liabilities resulting from failures, errors, delays, or defects associated with products, services, and systems we supply, including risks associated with work performed through joint venture arrangements;


•	adverse changes in federal government practices;

• pricing pressure on new work, reduced profitability, or loss of market share due to intense competition and commoditization of services we offer;

• adverse results of audits and investigations conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency, Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, or any of the Inspectors General for various agencies with which we contract, including, without limitation, any determination that our purchasing, property, estimating, cost accounting, labor, billing, compensation, management information systems, or contractor internal control systems are deficient;

• adverse determinations of any tax authority successfully challenging our operational structure, transfer pricing policies, or the taxable presence of our remaining subsidiaries in certain countries, or a finding against us in a material tax dispute, could increase our effective tax rate on our earnings and materially decrease earnings and negatively affect cash flows from operations;

• changes in the mix of our contracts and difficulties accurately estimating contract costs and contract performance requirements;

• ~~possible~~failure ~~further~~to ~~impairment of goodwill~~collect, ~~trade~~or ~~names~~delays ~~and~~in ~~other~~the ~~assets~~collection ~~as a result~~ of, ~~customer~~our ~~budget pressures and reduced U.S. federal government spending~~receivables;


•	failure of any government audit or compliance requirement including any failure to comply with laws and regulations applicable to government services providers;


•	possible impairment of goodwill, trade names, and other assets as a result of customer budget pressures and reduced U.S. federal government spending;


•	challenges attracting and retaining key personnel or high-quality employees, particularly those with security clearances;


•	failure to manage acquisitions or divestitures successfully, including identifying, evaluating, and valuing acquisition targets, integrating acquired companies, businesses or assets, losses associated with divestitures, and the inability to effect divestitures at attractive prices and on a desired timeline;


•	possible future losses that exceed our insurance coverage;

• pending litigation and any resulting expenses, payments, or sanctions, including, but not limited to, penalties, compensatory damages, or suspension or debarment from future government contracting; and

• the ~~effect~~significant ofinfluence ~~our~~Providence ~~acquisition~~(as bydefined ~~entities~~herein) ~~affiliated~~and ~~with~~Dr. ~~Providence~~Ernst onVolgenau ~~our~~have ~~business~~over ~~relationships,~~corporate ~~operating results and business generally~~decisions.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Subsequent events and developments may cause our views to change. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, except as required by law.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Adjusted EBITDA presented in this section is a supplemental measure that is not required by, or presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. This non-GAAP measure is not a measurement of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our calculations of this non-GAAP measure may not be comparable to that of other companies. We believe this measure is frequently used by securities analysts, investors, and other interested parties in the evaluation of high-yield issuers, as well as management to assess operating performance.

Business Environment and Outlook

We generate greater than 97% of our revenue from services provided as a prime contractor or subcontractor on engagements with various agencies of the U.S. federal government. Accordingly, our business performance is affected by the overall level of federal spending.

In recent years, the government has faced fiscal and economic challenges that have created pressure to identify efficiencies in discretionary spending. Those challenges adversely affected our industry’s financial performance from 2011 to 2013 but have eased somewhat since early 2014. In certain market segments, contract awards continue to face delays, pricing pressure and greater numbers of competitors, but we have observed fewer instances of contract scope reductions and funding pressure has lessened over the past year.

The sequester cuts enacted by the Budget Control Act of 2011 reduced spending levels in most federal agencies, and the government shutdown in October 2013 discontinued many federal functions and associated contractor support for approximately two weeks. In December 2013, the President signed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, which revised the limits on discretionary appropriations for government fiscal years 2014 and 2015, providing for higher levels of funding in those years than were allowed under the prior caps and budget enforcement procedures. On October 1, 2014, the government’s fiscal year 2015 began under a Continuing Resolution. The government has since been funded by a December 2014 omnibus spending bill and subsequent bills.

Given that our business is broadly distributed across the federal government, we are well positioned to invest and grow in the most attractive market segments. Years of budget pressure have led to a growing backlog of IT needs that have not been fully addressed. We expect our customers to make critical investments in areas such as cybersecurity, operating efficiency, Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, or C4ISR, and health care system modernization, and to continue supporting homeland security and special forces capabilities. We have limited exposure to areas of the budget that face the most significant ongoing pressure, such as Overseas Contingency Operations spending in the Defense Department, which relates to less than 1% of our business portfolio.

Since fiscal 2011, we have streamlined our cost structure and focused our investments in high-priority markets and technologies. We have increased our annual investments in business development, capture and proposal activities, while significantly reducing our overall selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A, through reductions in our indirect labor force, consolidation and reconfiguration of underutilized office space, and reduction of fringe benefits. In fiscal 2014, we created additional efficiencies by realigning our business into two groups and exiting several underutilized facilities. We have also undertaken initiatives to improve the profitability of our contract base, invest in our workforce, provide career mobility, and further collaborate internally in order to optimize business performance.

WeBusiness ~~continue~~Environment ~~to believe we are well positioned to gain market share~~ and ~~achieve~~Outlook long-term growth, and this belief has been validated by our improved win rates, the quality of our bids, and contract award volume since the beginning of fiscal 2014. With less than two percent market share in federal IT and professional services, we believe there are sufficient new business opportunities in our market to drive revenue growth and we continue to invest in our capacity to address them.

SRA generated more than 97% of its revenue from services provided on engagements with various agencies of the U.S. federal government in each of fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015. Accordingly, SRA’s business performance is affected by the overall level of federal spending.

Demand for IT and professional services is being driven by priorities of SRA’s customers to invest in areas such as cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, improved communications systems, IT modernization, data privacy protection, data analytics, and intelligence. Over the past few years, critical investments in these areas have been deferred due to budget constraints, resulting in a growing backlog of government IT needs. To that end, the administration’s government fiscal year 2016 budget request for IT spending proposes an increase of $1.4 billion, or 1.8% (from $78.1 billion to $79.5 billion), over the 2015 budget request level.

The sequester cuts enacted by the Budget Control Act of 2011 reduced spending levels in most federal agencies, and the government shutdown in October 2013 discontinued many federal functions and associated contractor support for approximately two weeks. In December 2013, the President signed the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, which revised the limits on discretionary appropriations for government fiscal years 2014 and 2015, providing for higher levels of funding in those years than were allowed under the prior caps and budget enforcement procedures. On October 1, 2014, the government’s fiscal year 2015 began under a continuing resolution. The government has since been funded by a December 2014 omnibus spending bill and subsequent bills. On November 2, 2015, the president signed into law a budget bill that sets federal spending through fiscal year 2017 and raises the debt ceiling until March of 2017.

In certain of SRA’s markets, contract awards continue to face delays, pricing pressure and greater numbers of competitors. However, SRA has observed fewer instances of contract scope reductions and funding pressure has lessened in recent periods. SRA believes that the administration’s request for incremental spending in IT for government fiscal year 2016 reflects increased focus by the government on these services.

Key Metrics

We manage and assess the performance of our business by evaluating a variety of metrics. Selected key metrics are discussed below.

~~Contract~~Submittals, Awards, Book-to-Bill, and Backlog

WeOur ~~define backlog as our estimate of the remaining~~ future ~~revenues~~growth ~~from~~is ~~existing~~dependent ~~signed~~upon ~~contracts.~~our ~~Our~~ability ~~backlog~~to ~~includes~~successfully ~~funded~~bid and ~~unfunded~~win ~~orders~~new ~~for~~contracts ~~services~~in ~~under~~our ~~existing~~target ~~signed~~markets. ~~contracts,~~Submittals ~~assuming~~include the ~~exercise~~total value of ~~all~~bids ~~option~~submitted ~~years relating~~for toprime ~~those~~funded ~~contracts~~opportunities, ~~less~~including ~~the~~both ~~amount~~new ofand ~~revenue~~recompete ~~we have previously recognized under those~~ contracts ~~and de-obligations~~. ~~Backlog~~The ~~includes~~total ~~all~~value ~~contract~~of ~~options~~proposals ~~that~~we ~~have~~submitted ~~been~~during ~~priced~~first ~~but~~quarter ~~not yet funded. Backlog also includes an estimate~~ of ~~the~~ ~~contract~~fiscal ~~value~~2016 ~~under~~was ~~single~~$1.8 ~~award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity~~billion, or$1.4 ~~ID/IQ,~~billion ~~contracts~~of ~~against~~ which wewas ~~expect~~for ~~future~~new ~~task~~business ~~orders to be issued without competition~~opportunities. ~~Backlog~~Submittals ~~does~~do not ~~take contract ceiling value into consideration under multiple award contracts, nor does it~~ include ~~any~~values ~~estimate~~ of ~~future~~bids ~~potential~~submitted ~~delivery~~for ~~orders~~indefinite ~~that~~delivery/indefinite ~~might~~quantity be(or ~~awarded under multiple award~~ ID/IQ) ~~vehicles, government-wide acquisition~~ contracts, or ~~GWACs,~~bids orsubmitted ~~General~~as ~~Services Administration, or GSA, schedule contracts. We define funded backlog to be the portion of backlog for which funding currently is appropriated and obligated to us under~~ a ~~contract or other authorization for payment signed by an authorized purchasing authority~~subcontractor.

~~Our~~Contract ~~future growth is dependent upon the strength of our target markets, our ability to identify opportunities, and our ability to successfully bid and win new contracts. New contract~~ awards ~~or orders~~ generally represent the amount of revenue expected to be earned in the future from funded and unfunded contract awards received during the period. ~~Ceiling~~Contract ~~increases~~awards ~~result~~include ~~from~~both ~~upward~~new ~~contract~~and ~~adjustments~~recompete ~~under existing~~ contracts. ~~and~~Given ~~increases~~that innew ~~scope.~~contracts ~~“De-obligations~~generate ~~and~~growth, ~~removals”~~we ~~refers~~closely totrack the ~~removal~~new ~~from~~awards ~~backlog~~component of ~~amounts previously awarded by a customer resulting from either (i) a formal~~ contract ~~modification~~awards ~~issued~~each byyear. ~~the~~The ~~customer~~total ~~reducing, or de-obligating, the remaining contract~~ value, orof ~~(ii)~~awards ~~the~~we ~~expiration~~received ofduring ~~the~~first ~~period~~quarter of ~~performance~~fiscal ~~without~~2016 anwas ~~extension issued by the customer which would be necessary for us to continue working under the contract~~$0.8 ~~In the latter case we remove the remaining contract value from backlog even though the contract value is not formally de-obligated by the customer~~billion.

(in millions)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015			Nine Months Ended March 31, 2015
Beginning backlog	$	3,375.4		$	3,478.4
New contract awards	228.9			612.8
Ceiling increases	81.2			351.5
Total contract awards	310.1			964.3
De-obligations and removals	(95.8		)	(172.4		)
Net orders	214.3			791.9
Revenue recognized	(349.7		)	(1,030.3		)
Ending backlog	3,240.0			3,240.0
Funded	$	604.0		$	604.0
Unfunded	2,636.0			2,636.0
Total backlog	$	3,240.0		$	3,240.0

Another key measure of our business growth is the ratio of total contract awards to revenue recorded in the same period, or the book-to-bill ratio. In order to drive future revenue growth, our goal is for the level of contract awards in a given period to exceed the revenue booked, thus yielding a book-to-bill ratio greater than 1.0. Our book-to-bill ratio for the period ending September 30, 2015, was 2.3.

ABacklog ~~key~~represents ~~measure~~our estimate of the remaining future revenues from our ~~business~~existing ~~growth~~contracts. isMore specifically, we define backlog as the ~~ratio~~funded ofand ~~total~~unfunded orders for services under existing signed contracts, ~~awarded~~assuming ~~compared~~the exercise of all option years relating to those contracts, less the amount of revenue ~~recorded~~we inhave ~~the~~previously ~~same~~recognized ~~period,~~under orthose ~~book-to-bill~~contracts ~~ratio~~and de-obligations. ~~Our~~Backlog ~~goal~~includes isall ~~for~~contract ~~the~~options ~~level~~that ofhave ~~business~~been ~~awards~~priced tobut ~~exceed~~not yet funded, and includes an estimate of the ~~revenue~~contract ~~booked~~value inunder ~~order~~single toaward ~~drive~~ID/IQ contracts against which we expect future ~~revenue~~task ~~growth~~orders to be issued without competition. ~~Our~~Backlog ~~book-to-bill~~does ~~ratio~~not include any value for the ceiling of multiple award contracts, ~~calculated~~nor ~~using~~does ~~total~~it ~~contract~~include any estimate of future potential delivery orders that might be awarded under multiple award ID/IQ vehicles, ~~was~~government-wide ~~0.9:1~~acquisition contracts (or GWACs), ~~0.9:1~~or ~~and~~General 1Service Administration (or GSA) schedule contracts.~~1:1~~ ~~for~~We define funded backlog to be the ~~three,~~portion ~~nine~~of backlog for which funding currently is appropriated and ~~twelve~~obligated ~~months~~to ~~ended~~us ~~March 31,~~under ~~2015,~~a ~~respectively~~contract or other authorization for payment signed by an authorized purchasing authority.

~~With~~Congress ~~over~~often ~~$100~~appropriates ~~billion~~funds offor ~~annual~~our ~~spending~~customers on ~~federal~~a ITyearly ~~and~~basis, ~~professional~~even ~~services,~~though ~~our~~the ~~addressable~~corresponding ~~market~~contract ~~continues~~with tous ~~support~~may acall ~~large~~for ~~pipeline~~performance ofthat ~~new~~is ~~business~~expected ~~opportunities.~~to ~~The~~take ~~total~~a ~~value~~number of ~~proposals~~years. weAs ~~submitted~~a ~~in the nine months ended March 31~~result, ~~2015~~contracts ~~was~~are ~~$5.0~~typically ~~billion.~~only ~~Submittals~~partially ~~include the total value of bids submitted for prime~~ funded ~~opportunities,~~at ~~including~~

~~both~~any ~~new~~point ~~and~~during ~~re-compete~~their ~~contracts.~~term ~~Submittals~~with dofurther ~~not~~funding ~~include~~dependent ~~values~~on ofCongress ~~bids~~making ~~submitted~~subsequent ~~for~~appropriations ~~ID/IQ~~and ~~contracts~~the orprocuring ~~bids~~agency ~~submitted~~allocating asfunding ato ~~subcontractor.~~the ~~As a result of this activity, we had approximately $3~~contract.6 ~~billion of funded proposals awaiting award decision at March 31, 2015.~~

~~Our~~Ceiling ~~total~~increases ~~backlog~~result asfrom ofupward ~~March 31,~~contract ~~2015~~adjustments ~~includes orders~~ under existing contracts ~~that,~~and increases in ~~some cases, extend for several years, with the latest expiring during calendar year 2023~~scope. ~~Congress~~Backlog ~~often~~is ~~appropriates~~decreased ~~funds~~by ~~for~~de-obligations ~~our~~and ~~customers on a yearly basis~~removals, ~~even~~which ~~though~~is the ~~corresponding~~removal ~~contract~~of ~~with~~amounts uspreviously ~~may~~awarded ~~call~~by ~~for~~a ~~performance~~customer ~~that~~resulting isfrom ~~expected~~either to(i) a ~~take~~formal acontract ~~number~~modification ofissued ~~years.~~by Asthe acustomer ~~result~~reducing, ~~contracts~~or ~~typically~~de-obligating, ~~are~~the ~~only~~remaining ~~partially~~contract ~~funded~~value, ator ~~any~~(ii) the ~~point~~expiration ~~during~~of ~~their~~the ~~term~~period ~~with~~of ~~further~~performance ~~funding~~without ~~dependent~~an onextension ~~Congress~~issued ~~making~~by ~~subsequent~~the ~~appropriations~~customer ~~and~~which ~~the~~would ~~procuring~~be ~~agency~~necessary ~~allocating~~for ~~funding~~us to ~~the~~continue ~~contract.~~working ~~The~~under ~~U.S.~~the ~~government may cancel any~~ contract ~~at any time~~. ~~Most~~In ofthe ~~our~~latter ~~contracts~~case ~~have~~we ~~cancellation~~remove ~~terms~~the ~~that~~remaining ~~would~~contract ~~permit~~value usfrom tobacklog ~~recover~~even ~~all~~though orthe acontract ~~portion~~value ofis ~~our~~not ~~incurred~~formally ~~costs,~~de-obligated ~~termination~~by ~~costs,~~the ~~and potentially fees for work performed~~customer.

AsOur total backlog as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, weincludes ~~expect~~orders tounder ~~recognize~~contracts ~~approximately~~that, ~~29%~~in ofsome ~~our~~cases, ~~backlog~~extend asfor ~~revenue~~several ~~within~~years, with the ~~next~~latest ~~twelve~~expiring ~~months~~during calendar year 2026.

As of September 30, 2015, we expect to recognize approximately 27% of our backlog as revenue within the next twelve months.



(in millions)	September 30, 2015

Funded	$	862
Unfunded	2,970
Total backlog	$	3,832

Contract Mix

When contracting with our customers, we typically enter into one of three basic types of contracts: cost-plus-fee, time-and-materials, and fixed-price.


•	Cost-plus-fee contracts. Cost-plus-fee contracts provide for reimbursement of allowable costs and the payment of a fee, which is our profit. In addition, some cost-plus-fee contracts provide for an award fee or incentive fee for meeting the requirements of the contract.


•	Time-and-materials contracts. Time-and-materials contracts provide for a fixed hourly rate for each direct labor hour expended plus reimbursement of allowable material costs and out-of-pocket expenses.

•

Fixed-price contracts. Fixed-price contracts provide for a pre-determined fixed price for specified products and/or services. Fixed-price-level-of-effort contracts are similar to time-and-materials contracts except they require a specified level of effort over a stated period of time. To the extent our actual costs vary from the estimates upon which the price of the fixed-price contract was negotiated, we will generate more or less than the anticipated amount of profit or could incur a loss.

Each of these contract types has unique characteristics. From time to time, contracts may be issued that are a combination or hybrid of contract types. Cost-plus-fee contracts generally subject us to lower risk. They also can include award fees or incentive fees under which the customer may make additional payments based on our performance. However, not all costs are reimbursed under these types of contracts, and the government carefully reviews the costs we charge. In addition, negotiated base fees are generally lower than projected profits on fixed-price or time-and-materials contracts, consistent with our lower risk. Under time-and-materials contracts, including our fixed-price-level-of effort contracts, we are also generally subject to lower risk; however, our profit may vary if actual labor hour costs vary significantly from the negotiated rates. Fixed-price contracts typically involve the highest risk and, as a result, typically have higher fee levels. Fixed-price contracts require that we absorb cost overruns, should they occur.

The following table summarizes our historical contract mix, measured as a percentage of total revenue, for the periods indicated.

	Three months ended March 31,				Nine months ended March 31,
	2014		2015		2014		2015
Cost-plus-fee	29	%	28	%	31	%	27	%
Time-and-materials	38	%	38	%	35	%	39	%
Fixed-price (a)	33	%	34	%	34	%	34	%

(a) Includes approximately 3% of the revenue earned on fixed-price-level-of-effort contracts for the fiscal 2014 and 2015 periods.

Labor Utilization

Because most of our revenue and profit is derived from services delivered by our employees, our ability to hire new employees and retain and deploy them is critical to our success. We define direct labor utilization as the ratio of labor expense recorded on customer engagements to total labor expense. We include every working employee in the computation and exclude leave taken, such as vacation time. As of March 31, 2015, we had approximately 5,400 employees. Direct labor utilization was

81.6% for both the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015, compared to 81.9% and 81.4% in the same periods of the prior year. In assessing labor utilization, management focuses on maintaining a high utilization rate to maximize profitability while ensuring time and resources are also spent strategically growing and managing the business. Labor incurred in the performance of our contracts is included in cost of services and all other labor costs incurred are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.



	Three months ended September 30,
	2014		2015

Cost-plus-fee	27	%	28	%
Time-and-materials	39	%	38	%
Fixed-price (a)	34	%	34	%

(a) Includes approximately 3% of the revenue earned on fixed-price-level-of-effort contracts for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015.

Days Sales Outstanding

Days sales outstanding, or DSO, is a measure of how efficiently we manage the billing and collection of accounts receivable, our most significant working capital component. From time to time we may offer discounts to our customers for early payment. We have also ~~utilize~~utilized an accounts receivable factoring facility to accelerate cash flow and lower our DSO. We calculate DSO by dividing accounts receivable at the end of each quarter, net of billings in excess of revenue, by revenue per day for the period. Revenue per day for a quarter is determined by dividing total revenue by 90 days, adjusted for partial periods related to any acquisitions and divestitures. DSO was 53 days as of ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2015~~2014 and 6358 days as of ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2014~~2015. The increase in DSO as of September 30, 2015 was due to, in part, to the temporary discontinuation of our factoring program.

Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow

We present Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow as they are measures used by our management to evaluate our operating performance and make investment decisions. These metrics are not recognized terms under GAAP and do not purport to be alternatives to measures of our operating performance as presented in accordance with GAAP. For further discussion on Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow, see “Non-GAAP Metrics.”

Seasonality

Certain aspects of our operations are influenced by the federal government’s October-to-September fiscal year. ~~The~~It ~~timing~~is ofnot ~~contract~~uncommon ~~awards,~~to ~~the~~experience ~~availability~~a ofhigher ~~funding~~level ~~from the customer and the incurrence~~ of contract ~~costs~~awards, ~~are~~funding ~~the~~actions ~~primary drivers of our revenue recognition~~ and ~~may~~overall ~~all be affected by the~~ government’s ~~fiscal~~demand ~~year. Additionally, our quarterly results are impacted by the number of working days in a given quarter. There are generally fewer working days~~ for ~~our~~services ~~employees to generate revenue~~ in the ~~first~~final ~~and~~months ~~second quarters of our fiscal year because our employees usually take relatively more leave for vacations~~ and ~~holidays,~~weeks ~~which leads to lower revenue and profitability in those quarters. Also, we typically give annual raises to our employees in the first half~~ of ~~our fiscal year, while~~ the ~~billing~~government ~~rates on our time-and-materials contracts typically escalate gradually, causing the profitability on these contracts to increase over the course of our~~ fiscal year.

Additionally, our quarterly results are impacted by the number of working days in a given quarter. There are generally fewer working days for our employees to generate revenue in the first and second quarters of our fiscal year (which are the third and fourth calendar quarters) because our employees usually take relatively more leave for vacations and holidays, which leads to lower revenue and profitability in those quarters. Also, we typically give annual raises to our employees in the first half of our fiscal year, while the billing rates on our time-and-materials contracts typically escalate gradually, causing the profitability on these contracts to increase over the course of our fiscal year.

Summary of Financial Results

	Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
	2014			2015			2014			2015
Revenue	$	355,930		$	349,708		$	1,039,465		$	1,030,341
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of services	276,319			266,861			800,506			786,725
Selling, general and administrative	50,004			46,364			135,751			132,646
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	2,248			2,096			7,156			6,170
Amortization of intangible assets	18,064			14,351			54,647			43,473
Gain on the sale of a portion of the Health & Civil business	—			—			(1,564		)	—
Total operating costs and expenses	346,635			329,672			996,496			969,014
Operating income	9,295			20,036			42,969			61,327
Interest expense	(25,714		)	(26,222		)	(78,241		)	(80,062		)
Interest income	9			11			43			34
Loss before income taxes	(16,410		)	(6,175		)	(35,229		)	(18,701		)
Benefit from income taxes	(7,122		)	(3,516		)	(14,233		)	(5,841		)
Net loss	$	(9,288	)	$	(2,659	)	$	(20,996	)	$	(12,860	)

	Nine months ended March 31,
	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	50,274		$	51,571
Revenue	$	338,614		$	351,006
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,476		)	(6,126		)
Operating costs and expenses:
Net cash used in financing activities	—			(10,833		)
Cost of services	255,763			269,849
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	48,798		$	34,612
Selling, general and administrative	44,929			47,707
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	2,076			1,982
Amortization of intangible assets	14,772			11,068
Total operating costs and expenses	317,540			330,606
Operating income	21,074			20,400
Interest expense	(27,274		)	(26,950		)
Interest income	14			15
Loss before income taxes	(6,186		)	(6,535		)
Benefit from income taxes	(2,028		)	(2,593		)
Net loss	$	(4,158	)	$	(3,942	)



	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	12,748		$	(24,257	)
Net cash used in investing activities	(3,146		)	(2,930		)
Net cash used in financing activities	—			—
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	9,602		$	(27,187	)

Items Affecting the Comparability of Our Operating Results

We define Adjusted EBITDA as GAAP net loss plus (i) provision for (benefit from) income taxes, (ii) net interest (income) expense, (iii) depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, and (iv) amortization of intangible assets, or EBITDA, adjusted to exclude certain items that do not relate directly to our ongoing operations or which are non-cash in nature and to include the pro forma impact of acquisitions and cost savings initiatives. Adjusted EBITDA, or Consolidated EBITDA as is defined in the credit agreement, and as presented in the table below is used to determine our compliance with incurrence covenants contained in our credit agreement. We also use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure in the evaluation of our business because it provides a meaningful measure of operational performance by eliminating the effects of period-to-period changes in taxes and interest expense, among other things.

Adjusted EBITDA increased in the three, nine and twelve months ended March 31, 2015 as compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase was primarily due to the pro forma impact of the acquisition of substantially all of the Government Services business from Qbase LLC in April 2015 and cost savings initiatives. Adjusted EBITDA margin, excluding the effect of acquisitions, for the three, nine and twelve months ended March 31, 2015 was 12.6%, 12.7% and 13.2%, respectively, compared to 11.4%, 12.2% and 12.4% for the prior year periods.

	Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
	2014			2015			2014			2015
Loss from continuing operations	$	(9,288	)	$	(2,659	)	$	(20,996	)	$	(12,860	)
Benefit from income taxes	(7,122		)	(3,516		)	(14,233		)	(5,841		)
Interest expense, net	25,705			26,211			78,198			80,028
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	2,659			2,225			8,279			6,964
Amortization of intangible assets	18,064			14,351			54,647			43,473
Stock compensation	435			633			2,565			3,419
Severance	162			171			1,313			670
Facility exit charge	8,053			3,855			8,556			3,304
Other, net	835			1,716			2,335			4,661
Gain on the sale of a portion of our Health & Civil business	—			—			(1,564		)	—
Subtotal - Adjusted EBITDA before certain items	39,503			42,987			119,100			123,818
EBITDA impact of acquisitions	—			3,021			—			10,183
EBITDA impact of cost savings	1,118			1,236			8,101			6,662
Adjusted EBITDA	$	40,621		$	47,244		$	127,201		$	140,663

	Twelve months ended March 31,
	2014			2015
Loss from continuing operations	$	(324,163	)	$	(16,024	)
Benefit from income taxes	(62,944		)	(7,894		)
Interest expense, net	103,344			105,955
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	11,431			9,410
Amortization of intangible assets	76,868			61,536
Stock compensation	2,935			4,200
Severance	1,759			836
Facility exit charge	8,377			7,558
Other, net	3,523			6,332
Impairment of goodwill and other assets	345,753			—
Gain on the sale of a portion of our Health & Civil business	(1,564		)	—
Subtotal - Adjusted EBITDA before certain items	165,319			171,909
EBITDA impact of acquisitions	—			12,726
EBITDA impact of cost savings	12,025			10,605
Adjusted EBITDA	$	177,344		$	195,240

The following items affect the comparability of our net loss period-over-period and, therefore, have been adjusted in arriving at Adjusted EBITDA:

• Stock compensation expense related to the stock incentive plans. The charges are included in SG&A in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

• Severance charges incurred to primarily reduce our indirect labor force. The gross charges are included in SG&A in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

• Facility exit charges related to the exit of underutilized space in certain of our leased facilities. The charges are included in SG&A in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

• Certain other items including the following:

	Three months ended March 31,				Nine months ended March 31,
	2014		2015		2014		2015
Signing and retention bonuses of certain executive officers	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Management fees	438		438		1,313		1,313
Merger and acquisition costs	179		148		656		465
Loss on sale of receivables	162		237		162		714
Facility opening costs	—		720		—		1,202
Other	56		173		204		967
Other, net	$	835	$	1,716	$	2,335	$	4,661
	Twelve months ended March 31,
	2014		2015
Signing and retention bonuses of certain executive officers	$	84	$	100
Management fees	1,750		1,750
Merger and acquisition costs	933		695
Loss on sale of receivables	162		962
Facility opening costs	—		1,202
Other	594		1,623
Other, net	$	3,523	$	6,332

• Impairment of goodwill and trade names as a result of the annual impairment analysis for fiscal 2013.

• Gain on the sale of a portion of our Health & Civil business in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

• The acquisition of substantially all of the Government Services business from Qbase LLC in April 2015. In calculating Adjusted EBITDA, we added the estimated EBITDA impact of acquisitions, as if the business had been acquired on the first day of the respective reporting periods.

• As defined in our credit agreement, cost savings represent the EBITDA impact of quantifiable run-rate cost savings for actions taken or expected to be taken within 12 months of the reporting date as if they had been realized on the first day of the relevant period. Specifically, for the periods presented, the cost savings adjustment represents the estimated EBITDA impact of actions taken to exit underutilized space in certain of our leased facilities, savings associated with certain fringe benefit changes and cost savings associated with actions to improve the profitability of our contract base.

The impact of these items on our net loss is shown in the table above. We present Adjusted EBITDA as an additional measure of our core business performance period over period. Adjustments to net loss result in a non-GAAP measure; however, we believe adjustment of the items above is useful as they are considered outside the normal course of our operations and obscure the comparability of performance period over period.

Results of Operations

Revenue

Revenue ~~decreased~~increased 13.7% to $~~349~~351.70 million in the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 from $~~355~~338.96 million in the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014. This ~~decrease~~increase was ~~impacted~~driven by the ~~completion~~acquisition of ~~the~~substantially ~~FDIC~~all ~~contract in April 2014. Revenue decreased 0.9% to $1,030.3 million in~~ the ~~nine~~government ~~months~~services ~~ended~~business ~~March 31, 2015~~ from ~~$1,039.5~~Qbase ~~million~~LLC in("Qbase") ~~the nine months ended March 31, 2014. This decrease was impacted by the completion of the FDIC contract~~ in April 2014 and the federal government shutdown in October 2013. Excluding these impacts, revenue increased 2.7% and 3.7% from the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015~~, respectively~~. ~~This increase was driven by an acceleration in new business wins and deceleration in contract erosion.~~

Operating Costs and Expenses

Operating costs and expenses consisted of the following for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

	Three months ended March 31,
	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015			% Change
Cost of services	$	~~276~~255,~~319~~763		$	~~266~~269,~~861~~849		(35.45	)%
Selling, general and administrative	5044,~~004~~929			4647,~~364~~707			(76.32	)%
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	2,~~248~~076			21,~~096~~982			(64.85	)%
Amortization of intangible assets	1814,~~064~~772			1411,~~351~~068			(2025.61	)%
	(as a percentage of revenue)
Cost of services	7775.65		%	76.39		%
Selling, general and administrative	1413.03		%	13.36		%
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	0.6		%	0.6		%
Amortization of intangible assets	54.14		%	43.12		%
	Nine months ended March 31,
	2014			2015			% Change
Cost of services	$	800,506		$	786,725		(1.7	)%
Selling, general and administrative	135,751			132,646			(2.3	)%
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	7,156			6,170			(13.8	)%
Amortization of intangible assets	54,647			43,473			(20.4	)%
Gain on the sale of a portion of the Health & Civil business	(1,564		)	—			NMF
	(as a percentage of revenue)
Cost of services	77.0		%	76.4		%
Selling, general and administrative	13.1		%	12.9		%
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	0.7		%	0.6		%
Amortization of intangible assets	5.3		%	4.2		%
Gain on the sale of a portion of the Health & Civil business	(0.2		)%	—

~~NMF = Not meaningful~~23

Cost of services consisted of the following for the periods presented (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2014		% of total		Three Months Ended March 31, 2015		% of total
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2014		% of total		Three Months Ended September 30, 2015		% of total
Direct labor and related overhead	$	~~136~~130,~~671~~084	4950.58	%	$	~~135~~141,~~618~~248	5052.84	%
Subcontractor labor	9086,~~543~~119		3233.87	%	8985,~~195~~043		3331.45	%
Materials and other reimbursable costs	4939,~~105~~560		1715.85	%	4243,~~048~~558		1516.81	%
Total cost of services	$	~~276~~255,~~319~~763			$	~~266~~269,~~861~~849
	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2014		% of total		Nine Months Ended March 31, 2015		% of total
Direct labor and related overhead	$	399,689	49.9	%	$	398,321	50.6	%
Subcontractor labor	257,435		32.2	%	260,920		33.2	%
Materials and other reimbursable costs	143,382		17.9	%	127,484		16.2	%
Total cost of services	$	800,506			$	786,725

Cost of services ~~decreased~~increased $914.51 million in the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 compared to the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 ~~and decreased $13~~.8 ~~million~~The inincrease ~~the~~is ~~nine~~due ~~months~~to ~~ended~~higher ~~March 31,~~business ~~2015~~volume ~~compared~~resulting tofrom the ~~same~~acquisition ~~period~~ of ~~the~~Qbase ~~prior year. Cost of services decreased~~ in ~~the~~April ~~three and nine months ended March 31,~~ 2015 ~~compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to lower materials and reimbursable costs as a result of the loss of the FDIC contract~~. As a percentage of revenue, cost of services ~~improved~~increased ~~slightly~~due ~~in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015 compared~~ to ~~the~~higher ~~three~~materials costs and ~~nine~~lower ~~months~~margins ~~ended~~on ~~March 31,~~recent ~~2014 primarily due to a more profitable contract mix~~awards.

Cost of services as a percentage of revenue varies from period to period depending on the mix of direct labor, subcontractor labor, and materials and other reimbursable costs. In periods where we have more materials and other reimbursable content, our costs of services as a percentage of revenue will be higher. We seek to optimize our labor content in performance of our contracts since we typically generate greater gross margin from our labor services, particularly from services that our employees provide, compared with other reimbursable items.

SG&A ~~decreased~~increased $32.68 million in the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 compared to the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 ~~and $3.1 million~~ in ~~the~~part ~~nine~~related ~~months ended March 31, 2015 compared~~ to ~~the~~approximately ~~same~~$7.7 ~~period~~million of ~~the~~merger ~~prior~~and ~~year~~acquisition costs. Excluding the impact of the merger and acquisition costs, facility exit charges, stock compensation expense, severance charges to reduce our indirect labor force, officer compensation and other non-recurring costs, which are all discussed in greater detail in the section listed “~~Items~~Non-GAAP ~~Affecting the Comparability of Our Operating Results~~Metrics,” SG&A decreased approximately $02.89 million ~~and $0.3 million~~ in the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 compared to the comparable ~~periods~~period of the prior year as a result of ~~cost~~incremental ~~saving~~state ~~efforts~~incentive tax credits and decreased spending on marketing, bid and proposal costs.

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment ~~decreased~~did ~~$0.2~~not ~~million~~materially change in the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 compared to the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 ~~and $1~~.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year, primarily as a result of disposing of assets in darkened facilities and delaying replacement of certain fully depreciated assets.

Amortization of intangible assets decreased $3.7 million in the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 ~~and $11.2 million in the nine months ended March 31~~, ~~2015 compared to the same period of the prior year,~~ primarily as a result of accelerated recognition of amortization ~~due~~based toon the expected benefits of the assets.

We recorded a gain on the sale of a portion of the Health & Civil business of $1.6 million recognized on the sale of six contracts from the Health & Civil group during the first quarter of fiscal 2014. For details, see Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015 included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.24

Interest

	Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015			~~2014~~			~~2015~~
Interest expense	$	(2527,~~714~~274	)	$	(26,~~222~~950	)	$	~~(78,241~~	)	$	~~(80,062~~	)
Interest income	914			1115			43			34
Interest, net	$	(2527,~~705~~260	)	$	(26,~~211~~935	)	$	~~(78,198~~	)	$	~~(80,028~~	)

Interest expense ~~increased~~remained inconsistent ~~the~~ three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 ~~by $0.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively,~~ compared to the comparable prior year ~~periods primarily due to an increase of the fixed rates on our interest rate swaps~~period. Interest expense for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015 includes amortization of original issue discount and debt issuance costs of $1.6 million and $5.3 million, respectively, compared to $1.8 million and $5.6 million in the comparable prior year periods. We manage our exposure to interest rate movements through the use of interest rate swap agreements. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, we had fixed the interest rate on all but $164.2 million of our outstanding total debt ~~of $1~~.~~1 billion.~~

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 and 2015 was a tax benefit of 4032.48% and 3139.27%, respectively. Our ~~year~~first toquarter ~~date~~ fiscal 2014 effective tax rate was ~~higher~~lower than the statutory income tax rate primarily due to ~~federal~~non-deductible ~~tax~~permanent ~~credits~~items and minimal state taxes. Our ~~year~~first toquarter ~~date~~ fiscal 2015 tax rate was ~~lower~~slightly higher than the statutory income tax rate primarily as a result of ~~adjusting~~non-deductible ~~tax~~permanent ~~benefits recognized previously in the financial statements and prior year tax returns~~items.

The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, is currently examining the Company’s federal income tax return for fiscal 2011. The IRS has contested a $136.7 million worthless stock deduction of a disposed subsidiary in that period. We believe our tax positions are appropriate and are prepared to vigorously defend them.

Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow

Adjusted EBITDA increased during the first quarter of fiscal 2016 compared to first quarter of fiscal 2015 due to the Qbase acquisition. Excluding the acquisition, adjusted EBITDA decreased due to lower margins on recent awards.

Free cash flow decreased during first quarter of fiscal 2016 compared to first quarter of fiscal 2015 due primarily to lower volume of accounts receivables factored as well as the timing of payroll-related items and vendor payments.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary capital needs are to finance the costs of operations, pending the billing and collection of accounts receivable and to make acquisitions. Our working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 was $~~128~~83.78 million compared to $7672.05 million as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, our total unrestricted cash and cash equivalents was $~~143~~68.58 million and our total outstanding debt was approximately $1.1 billion, excluding unamortized discount.

	Nine months ended March 31,
	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	50,274		$	51,571
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	12,748		$	(24,257	)
Net cash used in investing activities	(13,~~476~~146		)	(62,~~126~~930		)
Net cash used in financing activities	—			~~(10,833~~—		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	48,798		$	34,612
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	9,602		$	(27,187	)

Cash Flow

Accounts receivable represent our largest working capital requirement. We bill the majority of our customers monthly after services are rendered. Our operating cash flow is primarily affected by the overall profitability of our contracts, our ability to invoice and collect from our customers in a timely manner, and the timing of vendor and tax payments.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $5012.37 million in the three months ended September 30, 2014 and net cash used in operating activities was $5124.63 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~September ~~2014 and 2015~~30, ~~respectively~~2015. In the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, the increase in cash ~~provided~~used byin operating activities was primarily due to ~~more~~a ~~favorable~~lower ~~operating~~volume ~~results~~of ~~and~~accounts receivable sold pursuant to our factoring program as the ~~timing~~available offacility ~~interest~~was ~~payments~~temporarily reduced by $50.0 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $1.5 million and $6.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015, respectively. In the nine months ended March 31, 2015, net cash used in investing activities represented $6.1 million of capital expenditures. In the nine months ended March 31, 2014, net cash used in investing activities was driven by capital expenditures of $7.0 million partially offset by $5.5 million from the sale of a portion of the Health & Civil business.25

Net cash used in ~~financing~~investing activities was ~~zero~~$3.1 million and $102.89 million infor the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2014 and September 30, 2015, respectively~~. Borrowings on our revolving credit facility during the same nine months ended March 31~~, ~~2014 of $100.0 million were repaid during the same nine months. Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2015~~ related to ~~repayments~~capital ~~on our Term Loan B Facility~~expenditures.

28There was no cash used in financing activities during the three months ended September 30, 2014 or 2015.

Indebtedness

In connection with the Transaction, we entered into senior secured credit facilities consisting of an $875.0 million term loan B facility, orwhich we refer to as the Term Loan B Facility, ~~due~~with ~~July~~a ~~2018,~~term ~~and~~of seven years. On the same date we also entered into a $100.0 million ~~senior secured~~ revolving credit facility with a term of five years, orwhich we refer to as the Existing Revolver,. ~~due~~We ~~July~~refer ~~2016,~~to ~~and~~the ~~together~~Existing ~~with~~Revolver and the Term Loan B Facility, together, as the Existing Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Additionally, we issued $400 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, ~~or Notes,~~ due October 1, 2019, which we refer to as the Senior Notes.

Our Term Loan B Facility requires annual payments equal to 50% of excess cash flow, or ECF, based upon achievement of a net senior secured leverage ratio, or NSSLR, between 2.75x and 3.5x. The required annual payments adjust to 75% of ECF when NSSLR is greater than 3.5x, 25% of ECF when NSSLR is between 2x and 2.75x, and zero if NSSLR is less than 2x. Any required ECF payments are due in October each year, subject to acceptance by the lenders. We are required to meet the NSSLR covenant quarterly if any revolving loan, swing-line loan or letter of credit is outstanding on the last day of the quarter. As of ~~March~~ September 3130, 2015, we had no outstanding letters of credit or borrowings under our Existing Revolver. The ratio is calculated as the consolidated net secured indebtedness as of the last day of the quarter (defined as consolidated net secured debt less any cash and permitted investments) to the preceding four quarters’ consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement). As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, our net senior secured leverage ratio was 23.~~9x.~~1x Weand we were in compliance with all of our covenants asunder ofthe ~~March 31,~~Existing ~~2015~~Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

We repaid $140.0 million of our Term Loan B Facility in fiscal 2012, which satisfied all of the required quarterly principal payments for the term of the loan and satisfied our required ECF principal payments for fiscal 2012. We repaid $20.0 million of our Term Loan B Facility in fiscal 2013, which satisfied our required ECF principal payments for fiscal 2013. The fiscal 2014 ECF requirement was $61.5 million, of which we repaid $40.0 million during fiscal 2014. The remainder was tendered as payment in October 2014, of which $10.6 million was declined by the lenders and returned to the Company, as permitted by the facility. No amount was due in October 2015 due to the Qbase Government Services Business acquisition in April 2015.

The ~~$400.0~~Senior ~~million of~~ Notes bear interest at a rate of 11% per annum and mature on October 1, 2019. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually. The Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at ~~our~~the ~~option~~redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Senior Notes, atincluding ~~varying~~a redemption ~~prices~~price ~~that~~of ~~generally~~105.5% ~~include~~during ~~premiums~~the twelve-month period beginning on October 1, 2015, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date. On October 19, 2015 we announced our intention to redeem all of the Notes subject to the satisfaction of specified conditions, including the consummation of the previously announced combination of the Company with CSGov on or prior to the redemption date.

The Existing Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Senior Notes are guaranteed by all of our wholly- owned subsidiaries. The Existing Senior Secured Credit Facilities are also guaranteed by Sterling Parent LLC. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. Each of our subsidiary guarantors are 100% owned and have no independent assets or operations.

Capital Requirements

We believe the capital resources available to us under the Revolver portion of our Senior Secured Credit Facilities and cash from our operations are adequate to fund our normal working capital needs as well as our capital expenditure requirements, which are expected to be approximately 01.75% of revenue primarily due to our headquarters move, for at least the next twelve months. Historically, our capital expenditure requirements have been less than 1.0% of revenue.

Income Taxes

The Transaction accelerated the recognition of expense for stock options and restricted stock, creating a tax deduction of approximately $80.0 million in fiscal 2012. As a result of net operating loss carryforwards resulting primarily from this stock compensation deduction, aswe ~~well~~did asnot ~~Transaction~~make ~~costs~~significant ~~and~~ tax~~-deductible~~ ~~interest~~payments ~~expense,~~in wefiscal do2015. ~~not~~The ~~expect~~net tooperating ~~make~~losses ~~any~~are ~~material~~fully ~~U.S.~~utilized, ~~federal~~therefore, we anticipate an increase in income tax payments ~~until~~in fiscal 2016.

Accounts Receivable Factoring

During fiscal 2014, we entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement under which we sell certain accounts receivable to a third party, or (the “Factor”), without recourse to the Company. The Factor initially pays the Company 90% of the receivable and the remaining price is deferred and based on the amount the Factor receives from our customer. The structure of the transaction provides for a true sale, on a revolving basis, of the receivables transferred. Accordingly, upon transfer of the receivable to the Factor, the receivable is removed from our consolidated balance sheet, a loss on the sale is recorded and the deferred price is an account receivable until it is collected. ~~The~~ ~~balance of the sold receivables may not exceed $50 million at any time.~~ During the ~~three~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~nine months ended March 31, 2014, we sold $50.0 million~~ of ~~receivables~~fiscal ~~and recognized a related loss of $0.2 million in selling~~2016, ~~general and administrative expenses. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2015, we sold $103.4 million and $292.1 million of receivables, respectively, and recognized~~ a ~~related~~portion ~~loss~~ of ~~$0.2~~our million and $0.7 million in selling, general and administrative expenses for the same periods, respectively. As of March 31, 2015, the balance of the sold receivables was $29.5 million, and the related deferred price was $3.2 million. The factoring ~~agreement~~program ~~resulted in accelerated cash flow to us.~~

2926

was temporarily discontinued. As of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the balance of the sold receivables may not exceed at any time $56 million and $6 million, respectively. During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company sold $43.0 million of receivables and recognized a related loss of $0.1 million in selling, general and administrative expenses. As of September 30, 2015, the balance of the sold receivables was $2.5 million, and the related deferred price was $0.3 million. As of September 30, 2015, the available unused facility was approximately $3.5 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements, including retained or contingent interests in assets transferred to unconsolidated entities; derivative instruments indexed to our stock and classified in stockholder’s equity on the condensed consolidated balance sheet; or variable interests in entities that provide us with financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support or engage with us in leasing, hedging or research and development services. We utilize interest rate derivatives to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements.

For further discussion of our derivative instruments and hedging activities see Item 3 below and Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Description of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates are based on our historical experience and various other factors that are deemed reasonable at the time the estimates are made. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We re-evaluate these estimates quarterly and test goodwill and trade names for impairment at least annually during the fourth quarter as of April 1. We believe the critical accounting policies requiring significant estimates and judgments are revenue recognition, accounting for acquisitions, including the identification of intangible assets and the ongoing impairment assessments of goodwill and intangible assets, accounting for stock compensation expense and income taxes. If any of these estimates or judgments proves to be inaccurate, our results could be materially affected in the future.

For a full discussion of our critical accounting policies, refer to the "Description of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" section included in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 87, ~~2014~~2015.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standard Update, or ASU, 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. This ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective. This ASU ~~standard~~ is effective for ~~our~~the Company’s fiscal ~~2018~~2019. ~~Early application is not permitted.~~ This ASU permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. WeManagement ~~are~~is evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by ~~the~~this ASU and the effect that it is expected to have on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, ~~the~~FASB ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board~~ issued ASU 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest, which requires the debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. This ASU is effective for the Company’s fiscal 2017. Adoption of this ~~ASU~~standard is not expected to have ana material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement. ASU 2015-05 provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The new guidance becomes effective for the Company on July 1, 2016 with early adoption permitted. The Company can elect to adopt ASU 2015-05 prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date or retrospectively. We have not yet completed the evaluation of the effect that ASU No. 2015-05 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

Non-GAAP Metrics

Adjusted EBITDA

We use Adjusted EBITDA as supplemental measures in the evaluation of our business because we believe they provide a meaningful measure of operational performance by eliminating the effects of period-to-period changes in taxes and interest expense, among other things. Adjusted EBITDA, or Consolidated EBITDA as it is defined in our Credit Agreement, is also used to determine our compliance with incurrence covenants contained in our Credit Agreement. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental measure of our performance that is not required by, or presented in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to (loss) income from continuing operations or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as (loss) income from continuing operations plus (i) provision for (benefit from) income taxes, (ii) net interest (income) expense, (iii) depreciation and amortization of property and equipment, and (iv) amortization of intangible assets, or EBITDA, adjusted to exclude certain items that do not relate directly to our ongoing operations or which are non-cash in nature and to include the pro forma impact of acquisitions and cost savings initiatives.

We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is useful to our investors as it is a measure frequently used by securities analysts and investors in their evaluation of companies. Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled financial measures of other companies due to the potential inconsistencies in the methods of calculation.

Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyzing our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:


•	Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;


•	Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our interest expense, or the requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt;


•	Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our income tax expenses or the cash requirements to pay our taxes;


•	Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect historical cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;


•	although depreciation and amortization charges are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements.


•	Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect certain non-recurring cash expenditures based on the terms of our debt agreement.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to loss from continuing operations for the periods presented, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to Adjusted EBITDA:



	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015

Loss from continuing operations	$	(4,158	)	$	(3,942	)
Benefit from income taxes	(2,028		)	(2,593		)
Interest expense, net	27,260			26,935
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	2,435			2,195
Amortization of intangible assets	14,772			11,068
Stock compensation (a)	2,223			1,590
Severance (b)	347			302
Facility exit charge (c)	1,355			(627		)
Other, net (d)	1,226			9,215
Subtotal - Adjusted EBITDA before certain items	43,432			44,143
EBITDA impact of acquisitions (e)	—			—
EBITDA impact of cost savings (f)	664			1,414
Adjusted EBITDA	$	44,096		$	45,557



	Twelve months ended September 30,
	2014			2015

Loss from continuing operations	$	(24,778	)	$	(11,728	)
Benefit from income taxes	(16,298		)	(7,636		)
Interest expense, net	105,225			106,449
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	10,252			8,911
Amortization of intangible assets	68,963			54,810
Stock compensation (a)	4,235			3,277
Severance (b)	1,871			879
Facility exit charge (c)	14,054			3,563
Other, net (d)	4,436			14,946
Subtotal - Adjusted EBITDA before certain items	167,960			173,471
EBITDA impact of acquisitions (e)	—			7,139
EBITDA impact of cost savings (f)	10,287			11,150
Adjusted EBITDA	$	178,247		$	191,760


(a)	Represents the stock compensation expense related to our equity plans. These charges are included in SG&A expenses in our consolidated statement of operations.


(b)	Represents the severance charges incurred to primarily reduce our indirect labor force. These gross charges are included in SG&A expenses in our consolidated statement of operations.


(c)	Represents the facility exit charges related to the exit of underutilized space in certain of our leased facilities. These charges are included in SG&A expenses in our consolidated statement of operations.


(d)	Other, net includes certain items including the following:



	Three months ended September 30,
	2014		2015

Signing and retention bonuses of certain executive officers	$	—	$	—
Management fees	438		438
Merger and acquisition costs	147		7,739
Loss on sale of receivables	232		117
Facility opening costs	—		812
Other	409		109
Other, net	$	1,226	$	9,215

	Twelve months ended September 30,
	2014		2015

Signing and retention bonuses of certain executive officers	$	100	$	—
Management fees	1,750		1,750
Merger and acquisition costs	785		8,772
Loss on sale of receivables	641		856
Facility opening costs	—		2,829
Other	1,160		739
Other, net	$	4,436	$	14,946


(e)	Represents the impact of the acquisition of substantially all of the Government Services business from Qbase LLC in April 2015. As permitted under our Credit Agreement, we add the estimated impact of acquisitions as if the businesses

had been acquired on the first day of the respective period in which an adjustment is recorded, and not for any prior periods.

(f)

As defined in the Credit Agreement, cost savings represent the impact of quantifiable run-rate cost savings for actions taken or expected to be taken within 12 months of the reporting date as if they had been realized on the first day of the relevant period. Specifically, for the periods presented, the cost savings adjustment represents the estimated impact of actions taken to exit underutilized space in certain of our leased facilities, the run-rate cost savings associated with indirect labor reductions, savings associated with certain fringe benefit changes and cost savings associated with actions to improve the profitability of our contract base.

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow is defined as Cash flow provided by operating activities minus capital expenditures. Free cash flow is a supplemental measure of our performance that is not required by, or presented in accordance with GAAP. Management believes Free cash flow is useful to illustrate the underlying cash generation of our business. Free cash flow should not be considered as an alternative to net cash provided by operating activities or any other measures of our cash flow or liquidity.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Free cash flow to Net cash provided by operating activities for the periods presented, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to Free cash flow:



	Three months ended September 30,
	2014			2015

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	12,748		$	(24,257	)
Capital expenditures	(3,146		)	(2,930		)
Free Cash Flow	9,602			(27,187		)

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are subject to market risk, primarily relating to potential losses arising from adverse changes in interest rates. For a further discussion of market risks we may encounter, refer to our “Risk Factors” section included in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 87, ~~2014~~2015.

Interest Rate Risk

Borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities are at variable interest rates and expose us to interest rate risk. However, we manage our exposure to interest rate movements through the use of interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap derivatives decrease over time to a notional value of $475.0 million upon maturity of the swaps in July 2016. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 we had fixed the interest rate on $500.0 million of our outstanding Term Loan B Facility. The interest rate on the remaining $164.2 million of our outstanding Term Loan B Facility was variable. Borrowings under our Term Loan B Facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, with a 1.25% floor, or, at the Company’s option, an applicable margin plus an alternative base rate determined by reference to the higher of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, with a 2.25% floor. The three-month LIBOR was 0.2733% at ~~March~~September 3130, 2015. A hypothetical 1% increase in LIBOR over the 1.25% floor could increase our annual interest expense and related cash flows by approximately $1.6 million based on the unhedged portion of our senior secured credit facilities outstanding as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015.

3031

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2015, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, such that the information relating to us that is required to be disclosed in our reports filed with the SEC (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

3132

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For information relating to legal proceedings, see Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

~~There~~We ~~were~~discuss in our filings with the SEC various risks that may materially affect our business. Other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes ~~from~~to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 87, ~~2014~~2015.

The Merger is subject to certain conditions, and therefore the Merger may not be consummated on the terms or timeline currently contemplated or at all.

The consummation of the Merger remain subject to the satisfaction or waiver (to the extent permitted by applicable law) of certain conditions, including the receipt of all consents, approvals and authorizations by governmental authorities and certain representations and warranties of CSC and CSGov being true and correct in all respects as of the effective time of the Merger. In addition, the parties to the Merger Agreement have the right to terminate the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances. There can be no assurance that the Merger will be consummated on the terms or timeline currently contemplated. We have and will continue to expend a significant amount of capital and management’s time and resources on the Merger, and a failure to consummate the Merger as currently contemplated could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

ExhibitNo.		Description
31.1	+	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
31.2	+	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
32.1	+	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)
32.2	+	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

+ Filed herewith

Item 6. Exhibits



Exhibit No.		Description

2.1	*	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 31, 2015, by and among Computer Sciences Corporation, Computer Sciences Government Services Inc., Star First Merger Sub Inc., Star Second Merger Sub LLC, SRA Companies, Inc., SRA International Inc., and certain enumerated stockholders of SRA Companies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report of Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2015)

10.1	*	Separation Agreement and Release, dated as of August 28, 2015, by and between William Ballhaus and SRA Companies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report of Form 8-K filed on September 3, 2015)

31.1	+	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

31.2	+	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

32.1	+	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

32.2	+	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)



	*	Previously filed
	+	Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the county of Fairfax, Virginia on the ~~5th~~9th day of ~~May~~November, 2015.



	SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

	By:		/S/ DAVID F. KEFFER
			David F. Keffer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

3435

Filing Compare · SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.