UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

_____________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the quarterly period ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission File No. 0-21820

____________________________________________

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Oregon (State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		93-0822509 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

150 Avery Street

Walla Walla, Washington 99362

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(509) 529-2161

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

_____________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨		Smaller reporting company ý
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, no par value, on ~~July~~January 31, ~~2017~~2018 was 6,~~486~~464,~~928~~790 shares.

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016	3
	Unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017	3
	Unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	4
	Unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	4
	Unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	5
	Unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	5
	Unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three- and nine-months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	6
	Unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016	6
	Unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016	7
	Notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements	8
	Notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements	9
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	26
Item 5.	Other Information	26
Item 6.	Exhibits	27
SIGNATURES		28
EXHIBIT INDEX		29

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2017 AND SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2016~~2017

	June 30, 2017		September 30, 2016
	December 31, 2017		September 30, 2017
Assets	(in thousands)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	105,~~297~~344	$	109,~~491~~337
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $293 and $266, respectively	17,397		14,024
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $284 and $299, respectively	21,450		20,177
Inventories:
Raw materials	1314,~~582~~943		1112,~~690~~606
Work-in-process and sub-assemblies	1815,~~666~~273		1216,~~191~~543
Finished goods	710,~~544~~014		69,~~806~~439
Total inventories	3940,~~792~~230		3038,~~687~~588
Deferred income taxes	~~4,373~~—		34,~~934~~770
Prepaid expenses and other assets	4,~~577~~655		34,~~285~~439
Total current assets	7671,~~436~~679		6277,~~421~~311
Property, plant and equipment, net	13,~~140~~278		1312,~~789~~911
Deferred income taxes	12,~~897~~899		31,~~001~~299
Goodwill	10,~~335~~809		10,~~277~~616
Investment in Proditec	1,127		1,127
Intangibles and other assets, net	4,~~655~~433		54,~~369~~574
Total	$	~~107~~104,~~590~~225	$	95107,~~984~~838
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	910,~~931~~064	$	710,~~381~~490
Accrued payroll liabilities and commissions	7,~~264~~114		47,~~932~~714
Customers' deposits	108,~~231~~382		98,~~139~~085
Accrued customer support and warranty costs	2,~~185~~419		2,~~197~~276
Customer purchase plans	1,~~032~~155		1,~~124~~039
Income taxes payable	1,~~003~~359		—1,357
Current portion of long-term debt	~~429~~4,446		~~587~~4,566
Other accrued liabilities	2,~~817~~061		~~956~~1,923
Total current liabilities	3437,~~892~~000		2637,~~316~~450
Long-term debt	4,269		4,565
Deferred income taxes	—		1,514
Deferred income taxes	1,532		1,761
Other long-term liabilities	205		222
Other long-term liabilities	243		348
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock	34,~~769~~813		34,~~237~~959
Retained earnings and other shareholders' equity	3132,~~885~~207		2833,~~757~~693
Total shareholders' equity	6667,~~654~~020		6268,~~994~~652
Total	$	~~107~~104,~~590~~225	$	95107,~~984~~838
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2017 AND 2016

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2017			2016
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Net sales	$	4431,~~650~~272		$	3627,~~207~~363
Cost of sales	2822,~~917~~706			2518,~~553~~133
Gross profit	158,~~733~~566			109,~~654~~230
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	54,~~282~~650			4,~~135~~318
Research and development	32,~~272~~669			2,~~719~~494
General and administrative	2,~~040~~156			12,~~781~~092
Amortization of intangibles	~~204~~218			~~235~~227
Total operating expenses	109,~~798~~693			89,~~870~~131
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets	(5		)	13
Gain on disposition of assets	—			2
Income from operations	4,930			1,797
Income (loss) from operations	(1,127		)	101
Other income (expense)	(~~326~~210		)	(~~228~~78		)
Earnings before income taxes	4,604			1,569
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	(1,337		)	23
Income tax expense	~~1,565~~713			~~534~~8
Net earnings	$	3,039		$	1,035
Net earnings (loss)	$	(2,050	)	$	15
Net earnings per share
Net earnings (loss) per share
- basic	$	(0.4732	)	$	0.1600
- diluted	$	(0.4732	)	$	0.1600
Shares used in per share calculations - basic	6,~~486~~476			6,~~369~~375
Shares used in per share calculations - diluted	6,~~486~~476			6,~~369~~375
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~OPERATIONS~~COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2017 AND 2016

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2017			2016
	(in thousands, except per share data)
	(in thousands)
Net sales	$	99,368		$	89,520
Net earnings (loss)	$	(2,050	)	$	15
Cost of sales	65,322			63,417
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Gross profit	34,046			26,103
Foreign currency translation adjustment	665			(1,301		)
Operating expenses:
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation included in net earnings (loss)	6			6
Sales and marketing	14,107			12,293
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of comprehensive income (loss)	(176		)	441
Research and development	8,292			7,911
Total comprehensive loss	$	(1,555	)	$	(839	)
General and administrative	6,051			6,261
Amortization of intangibles	646			887
Total operating expenses	29,096			27,352
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets	(3		)	10
Earnings (loss) from operations	4,947			(1,239		)
Other income (expense)	(647		)	(758		)
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	4,300			(1,997		)
Income tax expense (benefit)	1,462			(784		)
Net earnings (loss)	$	2,838		$	(1,213	)
Net earnings (loss) per share
- basic	$	0.44		$	(0.19	)
- diluted	$	0.44		$	(0.19	)
Shares used in per share calculations - basic	6,434			6,309
Shares used in per share calculations - diluted	6,434			6,309
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~COMPREHENSIVE~~CASH ~~INCOME~~FLOWS

FOR THE THREE ~~AND NINE~~ MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2017 AND 2016

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2017			2016			~~2017~~			~~2016~~
	(in thousands)						~~(in thousands)~~
Net earnings (loss)	$	3,039		$	1,035		$	2,838		$	(1,213	)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings (loss)	$	(2,050	)	$	15
Foreign currency translation adjustment	1,390			(423		)	421			(274		)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation included in net earnings (loss)	6			6			18			18
Gain on disposition of assets	—			(2		)
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of comprehensive income (loss)	(475		)	142			(149		)	87
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss	50			(75		)
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	3,960		$	760		$	3,128		$	(1,382	)
Depreciation and amortization	1,009			1,016
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Share based payments	231			262
Reclassification from other comprehensive income	6			6
Deferred income taxes	1,542			29
Change in fair value of derivatives	(23		)	(46		)
Deferred rent	1			2
Bad debt expense	18			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable	(1,140		)	(2,652		)
Inventories	(1,539		)	(3,863		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	608			(384		)
Income taxes receivable	(804		)	—
Accounts payable	(467		)	1,530
Accrued payroll liabilities and commissions	(677		)	557
Customers’ deposits	213			1,830
Accrued customer support and warranty costs	124			(91		)
Income taxes payable	(36		)	(24		)
Other accrued liabilities	227			(524		)
Other	2			(1		)
Cash used in operating activities	$	(2,705	)	$	(2,415	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of property	$	—		$	2
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(860		)	(393		)
Cash used in investing activities	$	(860	)	$	(391	)
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.				(Continued)

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2017 AND 2016

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2017			2016
	(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings (loss)	$	2,838		$	(1,213	)
Payments on long-term debt	$	(120	)	$	(163	)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	10			9
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets	3			(10		)
Exchange of shares for statutory withholding	(387		)	(212		)
Foreign currency exchange loss	205			227
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	(497	)	$	(366	)
Depreciation and amortization	3,049			3,763
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH	69			(109		)
Share based payments	779			860
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(3,993		)	(3,281		)
Reclassification from other comprehensive income	18			18
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD	9,337			10,491
Excess tax benefits from share based payments	—			(14		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF THE PERIOD	$	5,344		$	7,210
Deferred income taxes	293			(779		)
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
Change in fair value of derivatives	(98		)	—
INFORMATION:
Deferred rent	3			6
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	79		$	84
Bad debt expense	33			(1		)
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	7		$	3
Changes in assets and liabilities:
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.				(Concluded)
Trade accounts receivable	(3,377		)	(5,228		)
Inventories	(8,869		)	(80		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(1,160		)	625
Income taxes receivable	1			3
Intangibles and other long term assets	—			(33		)
Accounts payable	2,449			(1,410		)
Accrued payroll liabilities and commissions	2,291			(70		)
Customers’ deposits	710			2,176
Accrued customer support and warranty costs	(16		)	(307		)
Income taxes payable	944			(43		)
Other accrued liabilities	1,843			(31		)
Other	(9		)	4
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	1,930		$	(1,537	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of property	$	8		$	32
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(1,667		)	(1,760		)
Cash used in investing activities	$	(1,659	)	$	(1,728	)
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.				(Continued)

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 AND 2016

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
	(in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to short-term borrowings	$	—		$	2,000
Repayments of short-term borrowings	—			(1,000		)
Payments on long-term debt	(447		)	(534		)
Excess tax benefits from share based payments	—			14
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	31			37
Exchange of shares for statutory withholding	(214		)	(255		)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	(630	)	$	262
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH	165			48
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(194		)	(2,955		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD	10,491			7,726
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF THE PERIOD	$	10,297		$	4,771
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	247		$	308
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	233		$	26
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.				(Concluded)

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2017


1.	Unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted from these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017. The results of operations for the three- ~~and nine-~~month ~~periods~~period ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, have been made to present fairly the Company's financial position at ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three- ~~and nine-~~month periods ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

On October 1, 2017, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2015-17, "Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes," which eliminated the requirement to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and non-current in a classified balance sheet. Instead, entities are required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current. The Company has elected to adopt the new guidance prospectively. As a result, the Company reclassified the net of $4.8 million of deferred tax assets in Current Assets and $1.5 million of deferred tax liabilities in Long-term liabilities that existed on its balance sheet at October 1, 2017 as long-term deferred tax assets on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

On October 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09, "Stock Compensation," which was intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including adjustments to the timing of when excess tax benefits should be recorded, that excess tax benefits are now recorded to earnings rather than equity, and classification in the statement of cash flows. The Company prospectively adopted the new guidance. As a result, a cumulative effect of $69,000 was recorded as a change to deferred tax assets and a credit to equity upon adoption. In addition, during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 the Company reduced income tax expense by $173,000 for excess tax benefits on shares vesting during the quarter at share prices in excess of the grant date fair value per share.

On October 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory" ("ASU 2015-11"). The previous standard required entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market, with market defined as net realizable value or replacement cost. ASU 2015-11 requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements, nor does the Company anticipate material future effects.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~Accounting Standard Update (“~~ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09, ~~as amended by ASU 2015-14, is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. ASU 2014-09~~ supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under US GAAP. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the ~~Company~~company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company is currently analyzing the effect of the standard across all of its revenue streams to evaluate the ~~impact~~effect of the new standard on revenue contracts. This analysis includes reviewing current accounting policies and practices to identify potential differences that would result from applying the requirements under the new standard. Most of the Company's contracts for goods and services are not complex and are primarily short-term in nature, and the Company's assessment at this stage is that ~~the~~it ~~Company~~ does not expect the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard to have a material effect on its financial statements. The Company plans to adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal ~~2018~~2019 using the modified ~~retrospective method by recognizing any cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.~~

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory" ("ASU 2015-11"). The previous standard required entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market, with market defined as net realizable value or replacement cost. ASU 2015-11 requires entities to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. The Company does not anticipate that it will have a material effect on its financial statements.8

Inretrospective ~~November~~method ~~2015,~~by ~~the~~recognizing ~~FASB~~any ~~issued~~cumulative ~~ASU~~effect ~~2015-17, "Balance Sheet Classification~~ of ~~Deferred~~initially ~~Taxes,"~~applying ~~which eliminates~~ the ~~current~~new ~~requirement~~standard ~~to present deferred tax liabilities and assets~~ as ~~current~~an ~~and~~adjustment ~~non-current in a classified balance sheet. Instead, entities will be required~~ to ~~classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current. This ASU will be effective for~~ the ~~Company~~opening ~~beginning~~balance ~~in its first quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~retained ~~year 2018 and may be adopted prospectively or retrospectively~~earnings. ~~Early adoption is permitted but the Company has not elected to do so. The Company does not expect its adoption to have a material effect on its financial statements.~~

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases" (“ASU 2016-02”), which is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. ASU 2016-02 will require lessees to recognize ~~the~~ assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by their leases on their balance sheet. Lessees will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet determined the effect that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Stock Compensation," which is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including adjustments to the timing of when excess tax benefits should be recorded and classification in the statement of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will materially affect its results of operations.


2.	Share-based compensation

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the Company granted 931,~~108~~000 shares of service-based stock awards. The fair value of these grants ~~ranged~~was ~~between~~ $1017.6864 ~~and $13.10~~ per share based on the fair market value of our common stock at the grant date. The restrictions on these shares lapse at the end of the required service ~~periods~~period ~~ranging~~in ~~from~~November ~~October 2017 through December 2019~~2020. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the Company also granted 6748,~~493~~331 shares of performance-based stock awards. The fair value of these grants was $1019.6802 per share based on the fair market value of our common stock at the grant date. The restrictions on these grants lapse upon achievement of performance-based objectives, or a change in control, for the three-year period ending September 30, ~~2019~~2020 and the continued employment ~~through~~of ~~October~~the ~~1, 2019~~grantee. The Company estimates that it is less than probable that the performance-based objectives on any of the performance-based awards granted in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 will be achieved and, therefore, has not recorded any share-based compensation expense in fiscal ~~2017~~2018 related to these awards.

Share-based compensation expense included in the Company's results was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2017		2016		~~2017~~		~~2016~~
Cost of goods sold	$	4041	$	8446	$	~~128~~	$	~~122~~
Operating expenses	~~226~~190		~~227~~216		~~651~~		~~738~~
Total share-based compensation expense	$	~~266~~231	$	~~311~~262	$	~~779~~	$	~~860~~

Share-based compensation expense remaining capitalized in inventory at ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016 was $21,000 and $22,000, respectively.

3. Income taxes

The provision (benefit) for income taxes is based on the estimated effective income tax rate for the year. Changes in the estimated effective income tax rate are accounted for in the period the change in estimate occurs. During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the research and development tax credit was permanently renewed retroactive to January 1, 2015. In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, income tax expense was reduced by approximately $106,000 for additional research and development tax credits related to expenditures incurred during fiscal 2015 due to the renewal of this tax credit.

In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") was enacted in the United States. The effects of this new tax law are wide-ranging and some of the provisions affect the Company in fiscal 2018, some in fiscal 2019, and some thereafter. The most significant impact is the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 34% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. As the Company is a fiscal year company, its fiscal 2018 statutory rate will be approximately 24% which is a blended rate based on the number of days before and after the January 1, 2018 date of the enacted rate change. The enacted rate of 21% will take full effect in fiscal 2019. As a result of this rate change, the Company reduced its net United States deferred tax assets and liabilities by approximately$1.0 million which was charged to income tax expense during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. As income tax timing differences continue to change during the remainder of fiscal 2018, additional reductions to deferred tax assets and liabilities for timing differences remaining at the end of fiscal 2018 will need to be recorded due to the change in statutory rates from 24% to 21% . The company has not completed its evaluation of the impact of TCJA in future fiscal years due to the limited available time since enactment, the complexity of certain areas, and the need for IRS regulations in several areas. However, due to the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, we anticipate a lower overall corporate income tax expense in future years.

In addition, in December 2017, Belgium enacted corporate tax law changes which will reduce its corporate income tax rate from 34% to 25% in 2020. This reduction is phased in and the Company's tax rate in Belgium will be 34% in fiscal 2018,

29.58% in fiscal 2019 and 2020, and 25% in fiscal 2021. As a result, the Company revalued its Belgian deferred tax assets in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 which resulted in a charge of approximately $200,000 to income tax expense during the quarter. As its Belgian deferred tax assets were approximately $2.4 million in pre-tax carryforwards, the ultimate effect of this change in tax rates will not be known until fiscal 2018-2020. The Company will reevaluate the Belgian tax rate change on a periodic basis over the next three fiscal years but believes its current estimate is materially accurate at this time.

4. Derivative instruments

The Company uses derivative instruments as risk management tools but does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. A hedge is deemed effective if changes in the fair value of the derivative contract are highly correlated with changes in the underlying hedged item at inception of the hedge and over the life of the hedge contract. To the extent the interest rate swap is effective, changes in fair value will be recognized in Other Comprehensive Income over the term of the derivative contract. To the extent the interest rate swap is not effective, changes in fair value will be recognized in earnings.

At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the Company had an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $4.64 million that fixes the interest rate on its LIBOR-based variable rate mortgage at 6.20%. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the fair value of the swap agreement recorded as a liability in Other long-term liabilities on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was $7937,000. There were gains of $2223,000 ~~and $97,000~~ recognized as part of net earnings in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to the swap agreement during the three- ~~and nine-~~month ~~periods~~period ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, ~~respectively,~~ because the interest rate swap was not designated as a hedge due to its ineffectiveness. During the three- ~~and nine-~~month ~~periods~~period ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the Company recorded $2316,000 ~~and $78,000~~ as interest expense related to the interest rate swap reflecting actual interest payments and settlements on the interest rate swap. The interest rate swap matures in July 2018. The fair value of a previous interest rate swap is being amortized into earnings from Other Comprehensive Income over the original forecasted settlement period of the swap as it is no longer designated as a hedge. As a result, the Company amortized $6,000 of losses from Other Comprehensive Income into net earnings during the three month period ended December 31, 2017.

10At December 31, 2017, the Company had a one-month undesignated forward exchange contract for €0.5 million ($0.6 million). Forward exchange contracts are used to manage the Company's foreign currency exchange risk related to its ongoing operations. Net foreign currency gains of $4,000 were recorded for forward exchange contracts in the three month period ended December 31, 2017 as a component of foreign currency gains or losses in Other income (expense) on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The gains or losses on the Company's forward exchange contracts are generally offset by gains or losses recorded on the underlying assets or liabilities held in foreign currencies. At December 31, 2017, the Company had liabilities of $8,000 for settlements under these forward exchange contracts in Other current liabilities on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

settlement period of the swap as it is no longer designated as a hedge. As a result, the Company amortized $6,000 and $18,000 of losses from Other Comprehensive Income into net earnings during the three- and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2017.

At June 30, 2017, the Company had a one-month undesignated forward exchange contract for €1.5 million ($1.7 million). Forward exchange contracts are used to manage the Company's foreign currency exchange risk related to its ongoing operations. Net foreign currency losses of $73,000 and gains of $123,000 were recorded for forward exchange contracts in the three- and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2017 as a component of foreign currency gains or losses in Other income (expense) on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The gains or losses on the Company's forward exchange contracts are generally offset by gains or losses recorded on the underlying assets or liabilities held in foreign currencies. At June 30, 2017, the Company had liabilities of $18,000 for settlements under these forward exchange contracts in Other current liabilities on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

5. Fair value measurements

Fair value measurements are classified under the following hierarchy:


•	Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.


•	Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs or significant value-drivers are observable in active markets.


•	Level 3 – Model-derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value-drivers are unobservable.

When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classify such measurements within Level 1. In some cases where market prices are not available, the Company makes use of observable market-based inputs to calculate fair value, in which case the measurements are classified within Level 2. If quoted or observable market processes are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that use, where possible, current market-based parameters such as interest rates, yield curves and currency rates. These measurements are classified within Level 3.

Derivative financial instruments

Interest rate swap agreements are measured on a recurring basis based on quoted prices for similar financial instruments and other observable inputs which approximate fair value. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is based on the differential between contract price and the market-based forward rate.

The following table presents the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consistent with the fair value hierarchy provisions:

	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
	(in thousands)
Description	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3	~~Level 3~~		Total Assets/(Liabilities) atFair Value	~~Total Assets/(Liabilities) atFair Value~~
Derivatives:
Interest rate swap	$	—	$	~~(79~~	)	$	$(37	—)	$	$(37	~~(79~~)	)
Forward exchange contracts	—		—			—	—		—	—

At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the Company also had ~~long-term~~ debt of approximately $4.74 million. The Company's ~~long-term~~ debt is recorded at historical cost and the Company has not elected to value such financial instruments at fair value. The fair value of the debt approximated its carrying value based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Forward exchange contracts had a fair value of zero at the reporting date, as these contracts were entered into as of that date. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

11At December 31, 2017, the Company's non-controlling interest in Proditec SAS had a carrying value of approximately $1.1 million. This investment is being accounted for under the cost method. The fair value of the Company's investment in Proditec was not estimated as there were no events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment, and our management determined that it was not practicable to estimate the fair value of the investment. Further, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's investment, and sufficient information is not readily available for the Company to utilize a valuation model to determine its fair value without incurring excessive costs relative to the materiality of the investment. The Company's cost method investment is evaluated for potential other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis or when an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.

At June 30, 2017, the Company's non-controlling interest in Proditec SAS had a carrying value of approximately $1.1 million. This investment is being accounted for under the cost method. The fair value of the Company's investment in Proditec was not estimated as there were no events or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment, and our management determined that it was not practicable to estimate the fair value of the investment. Further, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's investment, and sufficient information is not readily available for the Company to utilize a valuation model to determine its fair value without incurring excessive costs relative to the materiality of the investment. The Company's cost method investment is evaluated for potential other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis or when an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.

6. Financing arrangements

The Company's domestic credit facility provides for a maximum of $20.3 million consisting of a three-year term loan of $5.3 million and revolving loans up to the lesser of $15.0 million or a borrowing base calculated based on the outstanding amount of the Company's eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory. The credit facility also provides for a credit sub-facility of up to $4.0 million for standby letters of credit. The credit facility matures on July 19, 2018 and the Company expects to renew or refinance the credit facility in fiscal 2018. The revolving credit facility bears interest, at the Company's option, at either the lender's base lending rate or LIBOR using a tiered structure depending on the Company's achievement of a specified financial ratio. The Company's base lending rate option is the lender's base lending rate plus 0.75%, 1.00% or 1.25% per annum. The Company's LIBOR option is LIBOR plus 2.25%, 2.50% or 2.75%. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the interest rate would have been 3.4882% based on the lowest of the available alternative rates. The term loan bears interest, at the Company's option, at either the lender's base lending rate plus 1.75% or the one-, two-, or three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25%. The Company also simultaneously entered into an interest rate swap agreement with the lender to fix the term loan interest rate at 6.20%. The credit facility is secured by the Company's receivables, equipment and fixtures, inventory, general intangibles, subsidiary stock, securities, investment property, financial assets, real property, and certain other assets. The credit facility contains covenants related to minimum liquidity levels and certain financial covenants that will be applicable only if the Company does not exceed certain calculated total unrestricted cash and credit availability or an event of default occurs. The credit facility permits capital expenditures to a certain level and contains customary default and acceleration provisions. The credit facility also restricts, above certain levels, acquisitions, incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends and lease expenditures. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving line of credit and $10.67 million of outstanding standby letters of credit.

The Company's Belgian subsidiary has a credit accommodation with a commercial bank in Belgium. This credit accommodation totals €2.7 million ($3.13 million) and includes an operating line of €800,000 ($01.90 million), a bank guarantee facility of €500,000 ($0.6 million), and loan agreement provisions of €1.4 million ($1.67 million). The operating line and bank guarantee facility are secured by all of the subsidiary's current assets. The Belgian operating line bears interest at the bank's prime rate, plus 1.25%. At June 30, 2017, the interest rate was 9.75% and the subsidiary had no borrowings under the operating line. At June 30, 2017, the subsidiary had a loan outstanding under the loan agreement provisions totaling €67,000 ($76,000). The fixed interest rate on this loan was 3.98% . The loan matures in November 2017. At June 30, 2017, the subsidiary had no bank guarantees outstanding under the bank guarantee facility.

prime rate, plus 1.25%. At December 31, 2017, the interest rate was 9.75%. At December 31, 2017, the subsidiary had no borrowings under the operating line or loan agreement provisions. At December 31, 2017, the subsidiary had no bank guarantees outstanding under the bank guarantee facility.

7. Contractual guarantees and indemnities

Product warranties

The Company provides warranties on its products ranging from ninety days to five years following the date of shipment, the majority of which are for periods of one year or less. Management establishes allowances for warranty costs based upon the types of products shipped and product warranty experience. The provision for warranty costs is charged to cost of sales at the time of sale, and it is periodically assessed for adequacy based on changes in these factors.

12A reconciliation of the changes in the Company’s allowances for warranties for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows (in thousands):

A reconciliation of the changes in the Company’s allowances for warranties for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 is as follows (in thousands):



	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2017			2016
Beginning balance	$	1,892		$	1,932
Warranty costs incurred	(1,100		)	(567		)
Warranty expense accrued	1,268			378
Translation adjustments	21			(52		)
Ending balance	$	2,081		$	1,691

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Beginning balance	$	1,932		$	2,255
Warranty costs incurred	(1,842		)	(2,112		)
Warranty expense accrued	1,740			1,778
Translation adjustments	2			(9		)
Ending balance	$	1,832		$	1,912

Intellectual property and general contractual indemnities

The Company, in the normal course of business, provides specific, limited indemnification to its customers for liability and damages related to intellectual property rights. In addition, the Company may enter into contracts with customers where it agrees to indemnify the customer for personal injury or property damage caused by the Company's products and services. Indemnification is typically limited to replacement of the items or the actual price of the products and services. The Company maintains product liability insurance as well as errors and omissions insurance, which may provide a source of recovery in the event of an indemnification claim, but does not maintain insurance coverage for claims related to intellectual property rights.

Historically, any amounts payable under these indemnifications have not had a material effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company has not recorded any provision for future obligations under these indemnifications. If the Company determines it is probable that a loss has occurred under these indemnifications, then any such reasonably estimable loss would be recognized.

Director and officer indemnities

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and certain executive officers that require the Company to indemnify such individuals against certain expenses, judgments and fines in third-party and derivative proceedings. The Company may recover, under certain circumstances, some of the expenses and liabilities that arise in connection with such indemnifications under the terms of its directors’ and officers’ insurance policies. The Company has not recorded any provision for future obligations under these indemnification agreements.

Bank guarantees and letters of credit

At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the Company had standby letters of credit totaling $10.67 million. If the Company fails to meet its contractual obligations, these bank guarantees and letters of credit may become liabilities of the Company. This amount consists of outstanding performance guarantees secured by bank guarantees under the Company's domestic credit facility. Bank guarantees arise when the Company collects customer deposits prior to order fulfillment. The customer deposits received are recorded as current liabilities on the Company's balance sheet. The bank guarantees repayment of the customer deposit in the event an order is not completed. The bank guarantee is canceled upon shipment and transfer of title. These bank guarantees arise in the normal course of the Company's business and are not deemed to expose the Company to any significant risks since they are satisfied as part of the design and manufacturing process.

8. Subsequent Event

On January 25, 2018, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement with Duravant LLC and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to which such subsidiary will commence a tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company for $26.75 per share in cash in a transaction valued at approximately $175 million. The transaction is expected to close in the second fiscal quarter of 2018, subject to the tender and acceptance of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and other customary closing conditions. Additional information about the transaction is set forth in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2018.


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

From time to time, Key Technology, Inc. (“we", "us" or "our"), through its management, may make forward-looking public statements with respect to the company regarding, among other things, expected future revenues or earnings, projections, plans, future performance, product development and commercialization, and other estimates relating to our future operations. Forward-looking statements may be included in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), in press releases or in oral statements made with the approval of our authorized executive officers. The words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “intends,” “is anticipated,” “estimates,” “believes,” “projects” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as enacted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, the occurrence of any of which could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly, making it difficult for shareholders to resell common stock at a time or price they find attractive. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. Our actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those listed below:

• ~~adverse~~global ~~changes in general~~ economic conditions may adversely affect our customers, ~~our business~~ and ~~results~~our ofoperating ~~operations~~results;

• ~~ongoing~~political, ~~uncertainty~~economic, inand ~~the~~other ~~global~~risks ~~economy~~associated ~~may~~with international sales and operations could adversely affect our business and operating results;


•	variable economic conditions in the food processing industry, either globally or regionally, may adversely affect our sales;


•	significant investments in unsuccessful research and development efforts could materially adversely affect our business;


•	our existing and new products may not compete successfully in either current or new markets, which could result in the loss of market share and a decrease in our sales and profits;


•	the loss of any of our significant customers could reduce our sales and profitability;


•	competition may result in lower sales and prices for our products and services;


•	consolidation by our competitors could increase competition in the food processing equipment industry, and consolidation by our food processing industry customers could increase their purchasing power, both of which could reduce our sales and profitability;

• customer sourcing initiatives and purchasing power may adversely affect our new equipment and aftermarket sales, ~~which~~and could result in reduced gross margins;


•	our sales and profits may vary widely from quarter to quarter and year to year due to the timing, size and composition of major orders;


•	our operating results are seasonal and may further fluctuate due to severe weather conditions affecting the agricultural industry in various parts of the world;

• the failure of our independent sales representatives to perform as expected ~~could~~would harm our net sales;


•	our international operations subject us to a number of risks that could adversely affect our sales, operating results and growth;


•	we have made, or may make, acquisitions or enter into distribution agreements or similar business relationships that could disrupt our operations and harm our operating results;


•	fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could result in unanticipated losses that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position;


•	advances in technology by competitors may adversely affect our sales and profitability;


•	our expansion into new markets, increasingly complex projects and applications, and integrated product offerings could increase our cost of operations and reduce gross margins and profitability;


•	the failure of our suppliers to deliver quality products in a timely manner or our inability to obtain components for our products could adversely affect our operating results;


•	our dependence on certain suppliers may leave us temporarily without adequate access to raw materials, intellectual property or products;


•	the limited availability and possible cost fluctuations of materials used in our products could adversely affect our gross margins;


•	our products may suffer from defects leading to warranty claims;


•	information security breaches or business system disruptions may adversely affect our business;


•	our potential inability to attract and retain experienced management and other key personnel, or the loss of key management personnel, may adversely affect our business and prospects for growth;

• our potential inability to protect our intellectual property, especially as we expand geographically, may adversely affect our competitive advantage;

• ~~intellectual~~our ~~property-related~~potential ~~litigation~~inability ~~expenses~~to ~~and~~protect ~~other~~our ~~costs~~intellectual ~~resulting~~property, ~~from~~especially ~~infringement~~as ~~claims~~we ~~asserted~~expand ~~against~~geographically, ~~us by third parties~~ may adversely affect our ~~results~~competitive ~~of operations and our customer relations~~advantage; ~~and~~

• ~~our~~intellectual ~~financing~~property-related ~~agreements~~litigation ~~contain~~expenses ~~restrictive~~ and ~~financial~~other ~~covenants~~costs ~~that~~resulting from infringement claims asserted against us by third parties may adversely affect ~~us.~~our results of operations and our customer relations;

~~More~~• ~~information may be found in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in~~ our ~~Annual~~financing ~~Report~~agreements oncontain ~~Form~~restrictive ~~10-K~~and ~~for~~financial ~~the~~covenants ~~fiscal~~that ~~year~~may ~~ended~~adversely ~~September 30,~~affect ~~2016~~us; ~~filed with the SEC on December 9, 2016, which item is hereby incorporated herein by reference.~~and


•	changes in tax laws could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

More information may be found in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 filed with the SEC on December 8, 2017, which item is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Overview

General

We and our operating subsidiaries design, manufacture, sell and service automation systems that process product streams of discrete pieces to improve safety and quality. These systems integrate electro-optical automated inspection and sorting systems with process systems that include specialized conveying and preparation systems. We provide parts and service for each of our product lines to customers throughout the world. Industries served include food processing, tobacco, plastics, pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. We maintain two domestic manufacturing facilities and two European manufacturing facilities located in Belgium and the Netherlands. We market our products directly and through independent sales representatives.

In the past two years, over half of our sales have been made to customers located outside the United States. In our export and international sales, we are subject to the risks of conducting business internationally, including unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar, which could increase or decrease the sales prices of our products in local currencies; tariffs and other barriers and restrictions; and the burdens of complying with a variety of international laws.

The worldwide economy and economic uncertainty continue to affect our operating results. We continue to see customers seeking to retain cash and requiring higher returns on investment, price sensitivity, longer or delayed purchasing cycles, and more purchasing decisions at corporate levels rather than local operating locations. In addition, in response to excess capacity, the market continues to see very aggressive pricing efforts to stimulate demand, which has increased price competition for our products, especially in automated inspection systems where pricing and competition are particularly aggressive.

~~Current~~Subsequent ~~Period~~to -the ~~Third~~end of the quarter, on January 25, 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Duravant LLC and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to which such subsidiary will commence a tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company for $26.75 per share in cash in a transaction valued at approximately $175 million. The transaction is expected to close in the second fiscal ~~2017~~quarter of 2018, subject to the tender and acceptance of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and other customary closing conditions. Additional information about the transaction is set forth in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2018.

~~Net~~Current ~~sales,~~Period ~~net~~- ~~earnings,~~First ~~and orders for the third~~ quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~were the highest quarterly levels in our Company's history. We have now recorded nine consecutive quarters of year-over-year quarterly order growth.~~

Net sales of $4431.73 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were $83.59 million, or 2314%, higher than net sales of $3627.24 million in the corresponding quarter a year ago. The higher net sales in the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were primarily due to increased sales in the ~~automated~~process ~~inspection~~ systems and ~~process~~parts ~~systems~~and service product lines. Net sales increased most significantly in the European ~~region~~ and Asia-Pacific regions and in the potato and ~~market~~processed fruit and vegetable markets. International sales were 6568% of net sales for the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018, compared to 5155% in the corresponding prior-year period. The backlog of $52.1 million at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2017 represents an increase of $18.2 million, or 54%, over the backlog of $33.9 million at the end of the corresponding quarter a year ago and was second only to the backlog at the end of the second fiscal quarter of 2017. A significant portion of the ending backlog is not scheduled to ship until fiscal 2018. As a result, net sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 are expected to increase moderately as compared to the net sales recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

~~Orders~~Net ~~in the third quarter of fiscal 2017 of $41.8 million were up $9.8 million~~sales, ~~or 31%, compared to~~ orders ofand ~~$32.0~~ending ~~million~~backlog infor the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2016. Orders~~2018 ~~increased~~were ~~most significantly in automated inspection systems and process systems product lines. Orders increased primarily in~~ the ~~European~~highest ~~region~~first ~~and in the potato market globally. Third~~ quarter ~~and~~levels ~~year-to-date EMEIA (Europe, Middle East, India and Africa) orders~~ in ~~Euros~~our ~~increased~~Company's ~~by 104% and 72%, respectively, over the same periods in the prior fiscal year~~history. The ~~last~~first ~~four~~quarter ~~quarters~~ending ~~have~~backlog ~~been~~is ~~our~~the ~~largest~~second ~~four~~highest ~~individual~~quarter-end ~~EMEIA~~backlog ~~bookings quarters~~ in our Company's history. ~~North~~The ~~America~~backlog ~~was~~of ~~the~~$52.6 ~~largest~~million ~~order~~at ~~contributing~~the ~~region~~end inof the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018 ~~also~~represents ~~recording~~an ~~one~~increase of ~~the~~$6.8 ~~largest~~million, ~~quarterly~~or ~~orders~~15%, inover ~~our~~the ~~history~~backlog ~~for~~of ~~this region~~$45.8 ~~Orders~~million inat ~~North~~the ~~America~~end ~~included approximately $8.0 million~~ of ~~equipment~~the ~~associated~~corresponding ~~with~~quarter a ~~new~~year ~~plant~~ago ~~expansion~~and bywas asecond ~~significant~~only ~~North~~to ~~American~~the ~~potato~~backlog ~~processor.~~at ~~Total~~the ~~orders~~end ~~for~~of the ~~third~~second ~~quarter of~~ fiscal ~~2017~~quarter ~~also included orders~~ of $82017.~~0 million associated with multiple global projects from another major world-wide potato processor.~~

~~The~~Orders ~~gross margin percentage~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~was~~of 35$40.2%1 asmillion ~~compared~~were ~~to 29~~up $7.4%6 ~~for~~million, ~~the~~or ~~same~~23%, ~~period~~compared into ~~the~~orders ~~prior~~of ~~year~~$32. ~~The~~5 ~~increase~~million ~~was~~in ~~primarily~~the ~~due~~first toquarter aof ~~favorable~~fiscal ~~product~~2017. Orders ~~mix~~increased ~~and~~most ~~improvements~~significantly ~~and efficiencies~~ in ~~both~~ the process systems and ~~automated~~parts ~~inspection~~and ~~systems~~service product lines~~. The~~ ~~gross~~partially ~~margin~~offset ~~percentage~~by a decrease in the ~~fourth~~automated ~~quarter~~inspection ofsystems ~~fiscal~~product ~~2017~~lines. isOrders ~~expected~~increased toprimarily ~~decrease~~in ~~moderately~~the asNorth ~~compared~~American toand ~~the~~Asia-Pacific ~~percentage~~regions and in the ~~third~~potato ~~quarter~~market ~~of fiscal 2017~~globally.

~~Operating~~The ~~expenses~~gross ofmargin ~~$10.8~~percentage ~~million~~in ~~increased~~the ~~approximately~~first ~~$1.9~~quarter ~~million,~~of orfiscal 222018 was 27.4%, as compared to $833.97% ~~million~~ for the same period in the prior year. ~~Increased~~The ~~operating~~decrease ~~expenses~~was ~~were~~ primarily ~~the~~due ~~result~~to ofa ~~the~~large ~~increased~~factory ~~net~~underutilization ~~sales~~variance ~~and related sales commissions~~ as ~~well~~a asresult ~~increased~~of ~~personnel costs. Overall operating expenses in~~ the ~~fourth~~timing ~~quarter~~ of specific ~~fiscal~~customer ~~2017~~orders ~~are~~and ~~expected~~higher tothan ~~decrease~~normal ~~slightly~~customer ~~over~~support ~~the~~costs ~~expense~~on ~~level~~a infew ~~the~~significant ~~third quarter of fiscal 2017~~projects.

Operating expenses of $9.7 million increased approximately $0.6 million, or 6%, as compared to $9.1 million for the same period in the prior year. Increased operating expenses were primarily the result of the increased net sales and related sales commissions as well as increased personnel costs.

Income tax expense was adversely affected in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 by reductions in the corporate income tax rate enacted in December for both the United States and Belgium. As a result of these rate reductions, in the first quarter of fiscal

~~Overall~~2018, ~~our~~the ~~earnings~~Company ~~from~~reduced ~~operations of $4.9 million in~~ the ~~third~~carrying ~~quarter~~value of ~~fiscal~~its ~~2017~~net ~~improved~~deferred ~~compared~~tax toassets ~~earnings~~and ~~from~~liabilities ~~operations of $1.8 million~~ in the ~~same~~United ~~quarter~~States inand ~~the~~Belgium ~~prior~~by ~~year. The~~approximately ~~net earnings for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 were~~ $~~3.0 million, or $0.47 per diluted share. The net earnings for the corresponding three-month period in fiscal 2016 were $~~1.02 million, orwhich ~~$0.16~~was ~~per~~charged ~~diluted share. The net earnings in the most recent three-month period increased as compared~~ to ~~the~~income ~~prior~~tax ~~year period primarily due to improved net sales and gross profit margins, partially offset by higher operating expenses~~expense.

~~First~~There ~~nine~~was ~~months~~a loss from operations of $1.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 as compared to earnings from operations of $0.1 million in the same quarter in the prior year. The net loss for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 was $2.1 million, or $0.32 per diluted share. The net earnings for the corresponding three-month period in fiscal 2017 were $15,000, or $0.00 per diluted share. The net loss in the most recent three-month period as compared to the net earnings in the prior year period was due to improved net sales being offset by lower gross profit margins, higher operating expenses and increased income tax expense.

Net sales of $99.4 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 were $9.8 million, or 11%, higher than net sales of $89.5 million in the corresponding period a year ago. International sales were 60% of net sales for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 compared to 54% in the corresponding prior year period. Net sales were up primarily in automated inspection systems, the European region and the potato market. Customer orders in the first nine months of fiscal 2017 of $110.2 million were up $17.9 million, or 19%, compared to the orders of $92.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2016. Customer orders increased across all product lines, most significantly in automated inspection systems. Orders increased primarily in Europe and primarily in the potato market.

The net earnings for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 were $2.8 million, or $0.44 per diluted share. The net loss for the corresponding nine-month period in 2016 was $1.2 million, or $0.19 per diluted share. The increased net earnings in the more recent nine-month period is primarily due to higher net sales and gross profits partially offset by higher operating expenses.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified our critical accounting policies, the application of which may materially affect our financial statements, either because of the significance of the financial statement item to which they relate, or because they require management judgment to make estimates and assumptions in measuring, at a specific point in time, events which will be settled in the future. The critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates which management believes have the most significant effect on the financial statements are set forth below:


•	Revenue recognition


•	Allowances for doubtful accounts


•	Valuation of inventories


•	Long-lived assets


•	Allowances for warranties


•	Accounting for income taxes

Management has discussed the development, selection and related disclosures of these critical accounting estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been provided, the sale price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Additionally, we sell our goods on terms which transfer title and risk of loss at a specified location, typically shipping point, port of loading or port of discharge, depending on the final destination of the goods. Accordingly, revenue recognition from product sales occurs when all criteria are met, including transfer of title and risk of loss, which occurs either upon shipment by us or upon receipt by customers at the location specified in the terms of sale. Sales of system upgrades are recognized as revenue upon completion of the conversion of the customer’s existing system when this conversion occurs at the customer site. Revenue earned from services (maintenance, installation support, and repairs) is recognized ratably over the contractual period or as the services are performed. If any contract provides for both equipment and services (multiple deliverables), the sales price is allocated to the various elements based on the relative selling price. Each element is then evaluated for revenue recognition based on the previously described criteria. We typically have a very limited number of contracts with multiple deliverables and they are not material to the financial statements. Our sales arrangements provide for no other significant post-shipment obligations.

If all conditions of revenue recognition are not met, we defer revenue recognition. In the event of revenue deferral, the sale value is not recorded as revenue to us, accounts receivable are reduced by any related amounts owed by the customer, and the cost of the goods or services deferred is carried in inventory. In addition, we periodically evaluate whether an allowance for sales returns is necessary. Historically, we have experienced few sales returns. We account for cash consideration (such as sales incentives) that are given to customers or resellers as a reduction of revenue rather than as an operating expense unless an identified benefit is received for which fair value can be reasonably estimated. We believe that revenue recognition is a “critical accounting estimate” because our terms of sale vary significantly, and management exercises judgment in determining whether to recognize or defer revenue based on those terms. Such judgments may materially affect net sales for any period. Management exercises judgment within the parameters of GAAP in determining when contractual obligations are met, title and risk of loss are transferred, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. At December 31, 2017, we had invoiced $3.5 million, compared to $3.7 million at September 30, 2017, for which we have not recognized revenue.

Allowances for doubtful accounts. We establish allowances for doubtful accounts for specifically identified, as well as anticipated, doubtful accounts based on credit profiles of customers, current economic trends, contractual terms and conditions, and customers’ historical payment patterns. Factors that affect collectability of receivables include general economic or political factors in certain countries that affect the ability of customers to meet current obligations. We actively manage our credit risk by utilizing an independent credit rating and reporting service, by requiring certain percentages of down payments, and by requiring secured forms of payment for customers with uncertain credit profiles or located in certain countries. Forms of secured payment could include irrevocable letters of credit, bank guarantees, third-party leasing arrangements or EX-IM Bank guarantees, each

utilizing Uniform Commercial Code filings, or the ~~sales~~like, ~~price~~with governmental entities where possible. We believe that the accounting estimate related to allowances for doubtful accounts is ~~fixed~~a “critical accounting estimate” because it requires management judgment in making assumptions relative to customer or ~~determinable~~general ~~and~~economic ~~collectability~~factors isthat ~~reasonably~~are ~~assured~~outside our control. AtAs ~~June~~of December 3031, 2017, wethe ~~had~~balance ~~invoiced~~sheet ~~$4.1~~included ~~million~~allowances for doubtful accounts of $284,000 as compared to $~~1.7~~299,000 ~~million~~ at September 30, 2017. Amounts charged to bad debt expense for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were $18,000 and $0. Actual charges to the allowance for ~~which~~doubtful accounts for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were $38,000 and $0. If we ~~have~~experience ~~not~~actual ~~recognized~~bad ~~revenue~~debt expense in excess of estimates, or if estimates are adversely adjusted in future periods, the carrying value of accounts receivable will decrease and charges for bad debts will increase, resulting in decreased net earnings.

~~Allowances~~Valuation ~~for~~of ~~doubtful accounts~~inventories. WeInventories ~~establish~~are ~~allowances~~stated ~~for~~at ~~doubtful~~the ~~accounts~~lower ~~for~~of ~~specifically~~cost ~~identified,~~or asmarket. Our ~~well~~inventory asincludes ~~anticipated~~purchased raw materials, ~~doubtful~~manufactured ~~accounts~~components, ~~based~~purchased oncomponents, ~~credit~~service ~~profiles~~and ofrepair ~~customers~~parts, ~~current~~work ~~economic~~in ~~trends~~process, ~~contractual~~finished ~~terms~~goods and ~~conditions,~~demonstration equipment. Write downs for excess and ~~customers’~~obsolete ~~historical~~inventories ~~payment~~are ~~patterns. Factors~~made ~~that~~after ~~affect~~periodic ~~collectability~~evaluation of ~~receivables~~historical ~~include~~sales, ~~general~~current economic ortrends, ~~political~~forecasted ~~factors~~sales, inestimated ~~certain~~product ~~countries~~lifecycles ~~that~~and ~~affect~~estimated ~~the~~inventory ~~ability~~levels. The offactors ~~customers~~that contribute to ~~meet~~inventory ~~current~~valuation ~~obligations. We~~risks ~~actively~~are ~~manage~~ our ~~credit~~purchasing ~~risk~~practices, byelectronic ~~utilizing~~component anobsolescence, ~~independent~~accuracy ~~credit~~of ~~rating~~sales and ~~reporting~~production ~~service~~forecasts, byintroduction ~~requiring certain percentages~~ of ~~down~~new ~~payments~~products, ~~and~~product bylifecycles ~~requiring~~and ~~secured~~the ~~forms~~associated ofproduct ~~payment~~support. We ~~for~~actively ~~customers~~manage ~~with~~our ~~uncertain~~exposure ~~credit~~to ~~profiles~~inventory orvaluation ~~located~~risks inby ~~certain~~maintaining ~~countries. Forms~~low ofsafety ~~secured~~stocks ~~payment~~and ~~could~~minimum ~~include~~purchase ~~irrevocable~~lots, ~~letters~~utilizing ofjust-in-time ~~credit~~purchasing practices, ~~bank~~managing ~~guarantees,~~product ~~third~~end-~~party~~of-life ~~leasing~~issues ~~arrangements~~brought oron ~~EX-IM~~by ~~Bank~~aging ~~guarantees,~~components ~~each~~or ~~utilizing~~new ~~Uniform~~product ~~Commercial~~introductions, ~~Code~~and ~~filings,~~by orutilizing ~~the~~inventory ~~like,~~minimization ~~with~~strategies ~~governmental~~such ~~entities~~as ~~where~~vendor-managed ~~possible~~inventories. We believe that the accounting estimate related to ~~allowances~~valuation ~~for~~of ~~doubtful~~inventories ~~accounts~~ is a “critical accounting estimate” because it ~~requires~~is ~~management~~susceptible ~~judgment~~to inchanges ~~making~~from ~~assumptions~~period to period due to the requirement for management to make estimates relative to ~~customer~~each orof ~~general~~the ~~economic~~underlying factors ~~that~~ranging ~~are~~from ~~outside~~purchasing ~~our~~to ~~control~~sales to production to after-sale support. AsAt ~~of June~~December 3031, 2017, cumulative inventory adjustments to the ~~balance~~lower ~~sheet~~of ~~included~~cost ~~allowances~~or ~~for~~net ~~doubtful~~realizable ~~accounts~~value oftotaled $~~293~~5.8 million,~~000~~ as compared to $~~266,000~~5.3 atmillion ~~September~~at December 3031, 2016. Amounts charged to ~~bad~~expense ~~debt~~to ~~expense~~record inventory at lower of cost or net realizable value for the ~~nine~~three months ~~ended~~ending ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016, ~~respectively,~~ were $33157,000 and $(1358,000), respectively. Actual charges to the ~~allowance~~cumulative ~~for~~inventory ~~doubtful~~adjustments ~~accounts~~upon disposition or sale of inventory were $88,000 and $106,000 for the ~~nine~~three months ~~ended~~ending ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016, respectively,. If ~~were~~actual $8demand,~~000~~ ~~and~~market ~~$12,000. If~~conditions weor ~~experience~~product ~~actual~~lifecycles ~~bad~~are ~~debt~~adversely ~~expense~~different infrom ~~excess~~those ofestimated ~~estimates~~by management, orinventory ifadjustments ~~estimates~~to ~~are~~lower ~~adversely~~net ~~adjusted~~realizable values will result in ~~future~~a ~~periods,~~reduction to the carrying value of ~~accounts~~inventory, ~~receivable~~an ~~will~~increase ~~decrease~~in ~~and~~inventory ~~charges for bad debts will increase~~write-offs, ~~resulting~~and ina ~~decreased~~decrease ~~net~~to ~~earnings~~gross margins.

~~Valuation~~Long-lived ~~of inventories~~assets. ~~Inventories~~We ~~are~~regularly ~~stated~~review atall ~~the lower~~ of ~~cost~~our orlong-lived ~~market. Our~~assets, ~~inventory~~including ~~includes~~property, ~~purchased~~plant ~~raw~~and ~~materials~~equipment, ~~manufactured~~and ~~components,~~amortizable ~~purchased~~intangible ~~components~~assets, ~~service~~for ~~and~~impairment ~~repair~~whenever ~~parts,~~events ~~work~~or changes in ~~process,~~circumstances ~~finished~~indicate ~~goods~~that ~~and~~the ~~demonstration~~carrying ~~equipment~~value may not be recoverable. ~~Write~~If ~~downs~~the ~~for~~total ~~excess~~of ~~and~~projected ~~obsolete~~future ~~inventories~~undiscounted ~~are~~cash ~~made~~flows ~~after~~is ~~periodic~~less ~~evaluation~~than ofthe ~~historical~~carrying ~~sales,~~amount ~~current~~of ~~economic~~these ~~trends~~assets, ~~forecasted~~an ~~sales,~~impairment ~~estimated~~loss ~~product~~based ~~lifecycles~~on ~~and~~the ~~estimated~~excess ~~inventory~~of ~~levels. The~~the ~~factors~~carrying ~~that~~amount ~~contribute~~over tothe ~~inventory~~fair ~~valuation~~value ~~risks~~of ~~are~~the ~~our~~assets ~~purchasing~~is ~~practices~~recorded. In addition, ~~electronic~~goodwill ~~component~~is ~~obsolescence,~~reviewed ~~accuracy~~based ofon ~~sales~~its ~~and~~fair ~~production~~value ~~forecasts,~~at ~~introduction~~least annually. As of ~~new~~December 31, ~~products~~2017, ~~product~~we ~~lifecycles~~held ~~and~~$29.6 ~~the~~million ~~associated~~of ~~product~~long-lived ~~support~~assets, net of depreciation and amortization. WeThere ~~actively~~were ~~manage~~no ~~our~~material ~~exposure~~changes toduring ~~inventory~~the ~~valuation~~quarter ~~risks~~that bywould ~~maintaining~~result ~~low~~in ~~safety~~an ~~stocks~~adjustment ~~and~~of ~~minimum~~the ~~purchase~~carrying ~~lots,~~value ~~utilizing~~for ~~just-in-time~~these ~~purchasing~~assets. Estimates ~~practices,~~of ~~managing~~future ~~product~~cash ~~end-~~flows arising from the utilization of these long-~~life~~lived ~~issues~~assets ~~brought~~and onestimated byuseful ~~aging~~lives ~~components~~associated orwith ~~new~~the ~~product~~assets ~~introductions,~~are ~~and~~critical byto ~~utilizing~~the ~~inventory~~assessment ~~minimization~~of ~~strategies~~their ~~such~~recoverability asand ~~vendor-managed~~fair ~~inventories~~values. We believe that the accounting estimate related to ~~valuation~~long-lived ofassets ~~inventories~~ is a “critical accounting estimate” because: (1) it is susceptible to ~~changes~~change from period -to -period due to the requirement for management to make ~~estimates~~assumptions ~~relative~~about tofuture ~~each~~sales ofand ~~the~~cost ~~underlying~~of ~~factors ranging from purchasing to~~ sales togenerated ~~production~~throughout ~~to after-sale support. At June 30, 2017, cumulative inventory adjustments to~~ the ~~lower~~lives of ~~cost~~several orproduct ~~market~~lines ~~totaled~~over ~~$6.0~~extended ~~million,~~periods ~~compared to $5.1 million at June 30, 2016. Amounts charged to expense to record inventory at lower~~ of ~~cost~~time; orand ~~market~~(2) ~~for~~ the ~~nine~~potential ~~months~~effect ~~ending~~that ~~June 30,~~recognizing ~~2017~~an ~~and~~impairment ~~2016~~could ~~were~~have ~~$1.1~~on ~~million and $1.8 million, respectively. Actual charges to~~ the ~~cumulative~~assets ~~inventory~~reported ~~adjustments~~on ~~upon~~our ~~disposition~~balance orsheet ~~sale of inventory were $200,000~~ and ~~$931,000 for~~ the ~~nine~~potential ~~months~~material ~~ending~~adverse ~~June 30,~~effect ~~2017~~on ~~and~~reported ~~2016,~~earnings ~~respectively~~or loss. IfChanges ~~actual~~in ~~demand,~~these ~~market~~estimates ~~conditions~~could orresult ~~product~~in ~~lifecycles~~a ~~are~~determination ~~adversely~~of ~~different~~asset ~~from those estimated by management~~impairment, ~~inventory~~which ~~adjustments~~would ~~to lower market values will~~ result in a reduction to the carrying value ofand ~~inventory,~~a anreduction ~~increase~~to innet ~~inventory~~earnings ~~write-offs,~~in ~~and~~the aaffected ~~decrease to gross margins~~period.

~~Long-lived~~Allowances ~~assets~~for warranties. WeOur ~~regularly~~products ~~review~~are ~~all~~covered ofby ~~our~~standard ~~long-lived~~warranty ~~assets,~~plans ~~including~~included ~~property,~~in ~~plant~~the ~~and~~price ~~equipment,~~of ~~and~~the ~~amortizable~~products ~~intangible~~ranging ~~assets,~~from ~~for~~90 ~~impairment~~days ~~whenever~~to ~~events~~five oryears, ~~changes~~depending inupon ~~circumstances indicate that~~ the ~~carrying~~product ~~value~~and ~~may~~contractual ~~not~~terms beof ~~recoverable~~sale. IfThe ~~the~~majority ~~total~~ of ~~projected~~the ~~future~~warranty ~~undiscounted~~periods ~~cash~~are ~~flows~~for isone year or less. We ~~than~~establish ~~the~~allowances ~~carrying~~for ~~amount~~warranties offor ~~these~~specifically ~~assets~~identified, anas ~~impairment~~well ~~loss~~as ~~based~~anticipated, onwarranty ~~the~~claims ~~excess~~based ofon ~~the~~contractual ~~carrying~~terms, ~~amount~~product ~~over~~conditions ~~the~~and ~~fair~~actual ~~value~~warranty ofexperience ~~the~~by ~~assets~~product ~~is recorded~~line. InOur ~~addition,~~products ~~goodwill~~include isboth ~~reviewed~~manufactured ~~based~~and onpurchased ~~its~~components ~~fair value at least annually. As of June 30~~and, ~~2017~~therefore, wewarranty ~~held~~plans ~~$29.1~~include ~~million of long~~third-~~lived~~party ~~assets,~~sourced ~~net~~parts ofwhich ~~depreciation~~may ~~and~~not ~~amortization. There~~be ~~were~~covered noby ~~material changes during~~ the ~~quarter~~third-party ~~that~~manufacturer’s ~~would~~warranty. We ~~result~~actively inmanage anour ~~adjustment~~quality ofprogram ~~the~~by ~~carrying~~using ~~value~~a ~~for~~structured ~~these~~product ~~assets. Estimates~~introduction ofplan, ~~future~~process ~~cash~~monitoring ~~flows~~techniques ~~arising~~utilizing ~~from~~statistical ~~the~~process ~~utilization~~controls, ofvendor ~~these~~quality ~~long-lived~~metrics, ~~assets~~ and ~~estimated~~feedback ~~useful~~loops ~~lives~~to ~~associated~~communicate ~~with~~warranty ~~the~~claims ~~assets are critical~~ to ~~the~~designers ~~assessment~~and ofengineers ~~their~~for ~~recoverability~~remediation ~~and~~in ~~fair~~future ~~values~~production. We believe that the accounting estimate related to ~~long-lived~~allowances ~~assets~~for warranties is a “critical accounting estimate” because: (1) it is susceptible to ~~change~~significant ~~from~~fluctuation period-to-period due to the requirement for management to make assumptions about future ~~sales~~warranty ~~and~~claims ~~cost~~relative ofto ~~sales~~potential ~~generated~~unknown ~~throughout~~issues ~~the~~arising ~~lives~~in ofboth ~~several~~existing ~~product~~and ~~lines~~new ~~over~~products, ~~extended~~which ~~periods~~assumptions are derived from historical trends of ~~time~~known or resolved issues; and (2) ~~the~~risks ~~potential~~associated ~~effect~~with ~~that~~third-party ~~recognizing~~supplied ancomponents ~~impairment~~being ~~could~~manufactured ~~have~~using onprocesses ~~the~~that ~~assets~~we ~~reported~~do onnot ~~our~~control. As ~~balance~~of ~~sheet~~December 31, ~~and~~2017, the ~~potential~~balance ~~material~~sheet ~~adverse~~included ~~effect~~warranty onreserves ~~reported~~of ~~earnings~~$2.1 ~~or loss~~million. ~~Changes~~ inWarranty ~~these~~charges ~~estimates~~of ~~could~~$1.1 ~~result~~million inwere aincurred ~~determination~~during ofthe ~~asset~~three-month ~~impairment,~~period ~~which~~then ~~would~~ended. ~~result~~Warranty inreserves awere ~~reduction~~$1.7 tomillion ~~the~~as ~~carrying~~of ~~value~~December 31, 2016 and awarranty ~~reduction~~charges toof $0.6 ~~net~~million ~~earnings~~were inincurred during the ~~affected~~three-month period then ended. If our actual warranty costs

Allowances for warranties. Our products are covered by standard warranty plans included in the price of the products ranging from 90 days to five years, depending upon the product and contractual terms of sale. The majority of the warranty periods are for one year or less. We establish allowances for warranties for specifically identified, as well as anticipated, warranty claims based on contractual terms, product conditions and actual warranty experience by product line. Our products include both manufactured and purchased components and, therefore, warranty plans include third-party sourced parts which may not be covered by the third-party manufacturer’s warranty. We actively manage our quality program by using a structured product introduction

plan, process monitoring techniques utilizing statistical process controls, vendor quality metrics, and feedback loops to communicate warranty claims to designers and engineers for remediation in future production. We believe that the accounting estimate related to allowances for warranties is a “critical accounting estimate” because: (1) it is susceptible to significant fluctuation period-to-period due to the requirement for management to make assumptions about future warranty claims relative to potential unknown issues arising in both existing and new products, which assumptions are derived from historical trends of known or resolved issues; and (2) risks associated with third-party supplied components being manufactured using processes that we do not control. As of June 30, 2017, the balance sheet included warranty reserves of $1.8 million. Warranty charges of $1.8 million were incurred during the nine-month period then ended. Warranty reserves were $1.9 million as of June 30, 2016 and warranty charges of $2.1 million were incurred during the nine-month period then ended. If our actual warranty costs are higher than estimates, future warranty plan coverages are different, or estimates are adversely adjusted in future periods, reserves for warranty expense will need to increase, warranty expense will increase and gross margins will decrease.

Accounting for income taxes. Our provision for income taxes and the determination of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities involves a significant amount of management judgment. The quarterly provision for income taxes is based partially upon estimates of pre-tax financial accounting income for the full year and is affected by various differences between financial accounting income and taxable income. Judgment is also applied in determining whether the deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. In management’s judgment, when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of specific deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance must be established for the amount of the deferred tax assets that are determined not to be realizable. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, we had valuation reserves of approximately $~~197~~154,000 for deferred tax assets for capital loss carryforwards and changes in the carrying value of our investment in Proditec and for foreign deferred tax assets, primarily related to tax carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions that we believe will not be utilized during the carryforward periods. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, there was no change in our valuation reserves, other than a revaluation due to changes in the corporate income tax rate. There were no other material valuation allowances at ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 due to anticipated utilization of all the deferred tax assets as we believe we will have sufficient taxable income to utilize these assets. We maintain reserves for uncertain tax positions in jurisdictions of operation. These tax jurisdictions include federal, state and various international tax jurisdictions. Potential income tax exposures include potential challenges of various tax credits and deductions, and issues specific to state and local tax jurisdictions. Exposures are typically settled primarily through audits within these tax jurisdictions, but can also be affected by changes in applicable tax law or other factors, which could cause our management to believe a revision of past estimates is appropriate. Thus far, during fiscal ~~2017~~2018, there have been no significant changes in these estimates. Management believes that an appropriate liability has been established for estimated exposures; however, actual results may differ materially from these estimates. We believe that the accounting estimate related to income taxes is a “critical accounting estimate” because it relies on significant management judgment in making assumptions relative to temporary and permanent timing differences of tax effects, estimates of future earnings, prospective application of changing tax laws in multiple jurisdictions, and the resulting ability to utilize tax assets at those future dates. If our operating results were to fall short of expectations, thereby affecting the likelihood of realizing the deferred tax assets, judgment would have to be applied to determine the amount of the valuation allowance required to be included in the financial statements in any given period. Establishing or increasing a valuation allowance would reduce the carrying value of the deferred tax asset, increase tax expense and reduce net earnings.

~~During~~In December 2017, the ~~first~~Tax ~~quarter~~Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") was enacted in the United States. The effects of this new tax law are wide-ranging and some of the provisions affect the Company in fiscal ~~2016~~2018, ~~the~~some ~~research~~in fiscal 2019, and ~~development~~some ~~tax~~thereafter. The ~~credit~~most ~~was~~significant ~~permanently~~impact ~~renewed~~is ~~retroactive~~the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 34% to 21% effective January 1, ~~2015~~2018. InAs the ~~first~~Company ~~quarter~~is a fiscal year company, its fiscal 2018 statutory rate will be approximately 24% which is a blended rate based on the number of days before and after the January 1, 2018 date of the enacted rate change. The enacted rate of 21% will take full effect in fiscal ~~2016~~2019. As a result of this rate change, ~~income~~the Company reduced its net United States deferred tax ~~expense~~assets ~~was~~and ~~reduced~~liabilities by approximately $~~106,000~~1.0 ~~for~~million which was charged to income tax expense during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. As income tax timing differences continue to change during the remainder of fiscal 2018, additional ~~research~~reductions ~~and~~to ~~development~~deferred tax ~~credits~~assets ~~related~~and liabilities for timing differences remaining at the end of fiscal 2018 will need to ~~expenditures~~be ~~incurred~~recorded ~~during~~due to the change in statutory rates from 24% to 21%. The company has not completed its evaluation of the impact of TCJA in future fiscal ~~2015~~years due to the ~~renewal~~limited available time since enactment, the complexity of ~~this~~certain ~~tax~~provisions, ~~credit~~and the need for IRS regulations in several areas. However, we expect the effects of these regulations to be immaterial. In addition, due to the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, we anticipate a lower overall corporate income tax expense in future years.

~~Recent~~In ~~Accounting~~addition, ~~Pronouncements~~in ~~Not~~December ~~Yet~~2017, ~~Adopted~~Belgium enacted corporate tax law changes which will reduce its corporate income tax rate from 34% to 25% in 2020. This reduction is phased in and the Company's tax rate in Belgium will be 34% in fiscal 2018, 29.58% in fiscal 2019 and 2020, and 25% in fiscal 2021. As a result, the Company revalued its Belgian deferred tax assets in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 which resulted in a charge of approximately $200,000 to income tax expense during the quarter. As its Belgian deferred tax assets were approximately $2.4 million in pre-tax carryforwards, the ultimate effect of this change in tax rates will not be known until fiscal 2018-2020. The company will reevaluate this provision on a periodic basis over the next three fiscal years but believes its current estimate is materially accurate at this time.

InRecently ~~May~~Adopted ~~2014, the Financial~~ Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09, as amended by ASU 2015-14, is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods therein. ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company is currently analyzing the effect of the standard across all of its revenue streams to evaluate the impact of the new standard on revenue contracts. This includes reviewing current accounting policies and practices to identify potential differences that would result from applying the requirements under the new standard. Most of the Company's contracts for goods and services are not complex and are primarily short-term in nature, and the assessment at this stage is that the Company does not expect the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard to have a material effect on its financial statements. The Company plans to adopt the standard in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 using the modified retrospective method by recognizing any cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Pronouncements

On October 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2015-17, "Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes," which eliminated the requirement to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and non-current in a classified balance sheet. Instead, entities are required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current. The Company has elected to adopt the new guidance prospectively. As a result, the Company reclassified the net of $4.8 million of deferred tax assets in Current Assets and $1.5 million of deferred tax liabilities in Long-term liabilities that existed on its balance sheet at October 1, 2017 as long-term deferred tax assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheet.

InOn ~~July~~October ~~2015~~1, 2017, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ASU ~~2015~~2016-1109, "~~Simplifying~~Stock ~~the~~Compensation," ~~Measurement~~which ofwas ~~Inventory"~~intended ~~("ASU~~to ~~2015-11"). The~~simplify ~~previous~~several ~~standard~~aspects ~~required~~of ~~entities~~the toaccounting ~~measure~~for ~~inventory~~share-based atpayment ~~the~~award ~~lower~~transactions, ofincluding ~~cost~~adjustments orto ~~market,~~the ~~with~~timing ~~market~~of ~~defined~~when asexcess ~~net~~tax ~~realizable~~benefits ~~value~~should orbe ~~replacement~~recorded ~~cost. ASU~~that ~~2015-11~~excess ~~requires~~tax ~~entities~~benefits toare ~~measure~~now ~~inventory~~recorded atto ~~the~~earnings ~~lower~~rather ofthan ~~cost~~equity, and ~~net~~classification ~~realizable~~in ~~value~~the statement of cash flows. ~~Net~~The ~~realizable~~Company ~~value~~prospectively isadopted the ~~estimated~~new ~~selling~~guidance. As ~~price~~a inresult, ~~the~~a ~~ordinary~~cumulative ~~course~~effect of ~~business~~$69,000 ~~less~~was ~~reasonably~~recorded ~~predictable~~as ~~costs~~a ofchange ~~completion,~~to ~~disposal,~~deferred tax assets and ~~transportation~~a credit to equity upon adoption. ~~ASU~~In ~~2015-11~~addition, isduring ~~effective~~the ~~for~~first ~~annual~~quarter ~~reporting~~of ~~periods~~fiscal ~~beginning~~2018, ~~after~~the ~~December~~Company ~~15,~~reduced ~~2016~~income tax expense by $173,000 ~~including~~for ~~interim~~excess ~~periods~~tax ~~therein. The~~benefits ~~Company~~on ~~does~~shares ~~not~~vesting ~~anticipate~~during ~~that~~the itquarter ~~will~~at ~~have~~share aprices ~~material~~in ~~effect~~excess onof ~~its~~the ~~financial~~grant ~~statements~~date fair value per share.

InOn ~~November~~October ~~2015~~1, 2017, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ASU 2015-1711, "~~Balance~~Simplifying ~~Sheet~~the ~~Classification~~Measurement of ~~Deferred~~Inventory" ~~Taxes,~~("ASU ~~which~~2015-11"). The ~~eliminates~~previous ~~the~~standard ~~current~~required ~~requirement~~entities to ~~present~~measure ~~deferred~~inventory ~~tax~~at ~~liabilities~~the ~~and~~lower ~~assets~~of ascost ~~current~~or ~~and~~market, ~~non-current~~with inmarket adefined ~~classified~~as ~~balance~~net ~~sheet~~realizable value or replacement cost. ~~Instead,~~ASU ~~entities~~2015-11 ~~will~~requires beentities ~~required~~ to ~~classify~~measure ~~all~~inventory ~~deferred~~at ~~tax~~the ~~assets~~lower of cost and ~~liabilities~~net asrealizable ~~non-current~~value. ~~This~~Net ~~ASU~~realizable ~~will~~value beis ~~effective for~~ the ~~Company~~estimated ~~beginning~~selling price in ~~its~~the ~~first~~ordinary ~~quarter~~course of ~~fiscal~~business, ~~year~~less ~~2018~~reasonably ~~and~~predictable ~~may~~costs beof ~~adopted~~completion, ~~prospectively~~disposal, orand ~~retrospectively~~transportation. ~~Early~~The adoption isof ~~permitted~~this ~~but~~standard ~~the~~did ~~Company has~~ not ~~elected~~have toa domaterial ~~so. The~~effect ~~Company~~on ~~does~~its ~~not~~financial ~~expect~~statements, ~~its~~nor ~~adoption~~does tothe ~~have~~Company aanticipate material ~~effect~~future ~~on its financial statements~~effects.

InRecent ~~February~~Accounting ~~2016,~~Pronouncements ~~the~~Not ~~FASB~~Yet issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases" (“ASU 2016-02”), which is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. ASU 2016-02 will require lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by their leases on their balance sheet. Lessees will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet determined the effect that adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.Adopted

In ~~March~~May ~~2016~~2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU ~~2016~~2014-09, ~~"Stock~~“Revenue ~~Compensation,"~~from ~~which~~Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under US GAAP. The standard’s core principle is ~~intended~~that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to ~~simplify~~customers ~~several~~in ~~aspects~~an ofamount that reflects the ~~accounting~~consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for ~~share-based~~those ~~payment~~goods ~~award~~or ~~transactions,~~services. ~~including~~The ~~adjustments~~Company is currently analyzing the effect of the standard across all of its revenue streams to evaluate the ~~timing~~effect of ~~when~~the ~~excess~~new ~~tax~~standard ~~benefits~~on ~~should~~revenue becontracts. ~~recorded~~This analysis includes reviewing current accounting policies and ~~classification~~practices into identify potential differences that would result from applying the ~~statement~~requirements ofunder ~~cash~~the ~~flows~~new standard. ~~The~~ ~~guidance~~Most ~~will~~of bethe ~~effective~~Company's contracts for ~~fiscal~~goods ~~years~~and ~~beginning~~services ~~after~~are ~~December~~not ~~15,~~complex ~~2016~~and are primarily short-term in nature, ~~including~~and ~~interim~~the ~~periods~~Company's ~~within~~assessment ~~those~~at ~~years~~this stage is that it does not expect the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard to have a material effect on its financial statements. The Company ~~does~~plans ~~not~~to ~~anticipate~~adopt ~~that~~the standard in the ~~adoption~~first quarter of ~~this~~fiscal ~~ASU~~2019 ~~will~~using ~~materially~~the ~~affect~~modified ~~its~~retrospective ~~results~~method by recognizing any cumulative effect of ~~operations~~initially applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases" (“ASU 2016-02”), which is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions. ASU 2016-02 will require lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by their leases on their balance sheet. Lessees will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet determined the effect that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations.

Results of Operations

For the three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016

Net sales increased $3.9 million, or 14%, to $31.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 from $27.4 million recorded in the corresponding quarter a year ago. International sales for the three-month period ending December 31, 2017 were 68% of net ~~earnings~~sales, compared to 55% in the corresponding prior year period. The increase in net sales occurred primarily in the European and ~~orders~~Asia-Pacific ~~for~~regions, and increased primarily in the ~~third~~potato and processed fruit and vegetable markets. Net sales of process systems increased $2.2 million, or 23%, to $11.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018. This increase was across most process system product types. Automated inspection systems net sales were up $0.3 million, or 3%, to $11.4 million due primarily to the ~~highest~~timing ~~quarterly~~of ~~levels~~shipments. Parts and service sales were $8.2 million, up $1.4 million. Automated inspection systems sales, including upgrade systems, represented 36% of net sales in ~~our~~the ~~Company's~~first ~~history~~quarter of fiscal 2018 compared to 40% of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Process Wesystems ~~have~~sales ~~now~~represented ~~recorded~~37% ~~nine~~of ~~consecutive~~net ~~quarters~~sales in the first quarter of ~~year-over-year~~fiscal ~~quarterly~~2018 ~~order~~and ~~growth~~compared to 35% in the first quarter of fiscal 2017, while parts and service sales accounted for 27% of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, compared to 25% during the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

~~Net~~Total ~~sales~~backlog ~~increased~~was $852.56 million, orat ~~23%,~~the toend ~~$44.7~~of ~~million in~~ the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018, ~~from~~which was $366.28 million, ~~recorded~~or in15%, ~~the~~higher ~~corresponding~~than ~~quarter~~the ~~a year ago~~$45. ~~International~~8 ~~sales~~million ~~for~~backlog at the ~~three-month~~end ~~period~~of ~~ending~~the ~~June 30,~~first ~~2017~~quarter ~~were~~of ~~65%~~the ofprior ~~net~~fiscal ~~sales,~~year ~~compared~~and tois ~~51%~~second only in the ~~corresponding~~Company's ~~prior~~history ~~year~~to ~~period. The~~the ~~increase~~backlog inat ~~net~~the ~~sales~~end ~~occurred~~of ~~primarily in~~ the ~~European~~second ~~region,~~fiscal ~~and increased~~quarter ~~primarily~~of ~~in the potato market~~2017. Automated inspection systems ~~net~~backlog ~~sales~~decreased ~~were~~by up $52.7 million, or 5813%, to $1518.7 million ~~due~~at ~~primarily to~~ the ~~timing~~end of ~~shipments.~~the ~~The~~first ~~increase~~quarter ~~in automated inspection system sales was in belt-fed, upgrade and ADR products. Net sales~~ of ~~process~~fiscal ~~systems~~2018 ~~increased~~compared ~~$2.4 million, or 13%,~~ to $21.04 million inat the ~~third~~same ~~quarter~~time ofa ~~fiscal~~year ~~2017~~ago. ~~This~~The ~~increase~~decrease was ~~across~~primarily ~~most~~in ~~process~~belt-fed ~~system~~and ~~product~~chute-fed ~~types~~products. Backlog ~~Parts~~for ~~and~~process ~~service~~systems ~~sales~~was ~~were~~up $8.05 million, upor 38%, to $030.37 million. ~~Automated~~at ~~inspection systems sales~~December 31, ~~including upgrade systems, represented 35% of net sales in the third quarter of fiscal~~ 2017 compared to ~~28% of net sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2016~~$22. ~~Process~~2 ~~systems~~million ~~sales~~at ~~represented~~December 31, ~~47% of net sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2017 and compared to 51% in the third quarter of fiscal~~ 2016, ~~while parts~~ and ~~service~~was ~~sales~~up ~~accounted~~across ~~for~~most ~~18%~~product ~~of net sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, compared to 21% during the third quarter of fiscal 2016~~types. ABacklog ~~significant~~by ~~portion~~product of the ending backlog as of June 30, 2017 is not scheduled to ship until fiscal 2018. As a result, we expect net sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 to increase moderately as compared to the net sales reported in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

Total backlog was $52.1 million at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2017, which was $18.2 million, or 54%, higher than the $33.9 million backlog at the end of the third quarter of the prior fiscal year and was second only to the backlog at the end of the second fiscal quarter of 2017. Automated inspection systems backlog increased by $7.4 million, or 46%, to $23.7 million at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to $16.3 million at the same time a year ago. The increase was primarily in belt-fed, upgrade and ADR products. Backlog for process systems was up $10.4 million, or 67%, to $26.0 million at June 30, 2017 compared to $15.6 million at June 30, 2016, and was up across most product types. Backlog by product line at June 30, 2017 was 45% automated inspection systems, 50% process systems, and 5% parts and service, as compared to 48% automated inspection systems, 46% process systems, and 6% parts and service at June 30, 2016.

Orders of $41.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2017 were $9.8 million, or 31%, higher than the third quarter new orders of $32.0 million a year ago. Orders for process systems during the third quarter of fiscal 2017 increased $5.4 million, or 41%, to

~~$18.7~~line ~~million~~at ~~from~~December 31, ~~$13.3~~2017 ~~million~~was in36% ~~the~~automated ~~comparable quarter of fiscal 2016. The increase in orders for process systems occurred across most product types. Automated~~ inspection systems, ~~orders~~58% ~~increased~~process ~~$4.2 million~~systems, orand 396%, ~~during~~parts ~~the~~and ~~third~~service, ~~quarter~~as ~~of fiscal 2017 to $15.0 million~~ compared to ~~$10.8~~47% ~~million~~automated ~~in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. Orders for automation~~ inspection systems, ~~increased primarily~~48% ~~for~~process ~~belt-fed~~systems, ~~upgrade~~ and ~~ADR~~5% ~~product types. Orders for~~ parts and service ~~were~~at ~~$8.1 million~~December 31, ~~or 2% higher than in the third quarter of fiscal~~ 2016 ~~of $8~~.0 million. Orders overall were up primarily in Europe and most significantly in the potato market. Third quarter and year-to-date EMEIA orders in Euros increased by 104% and 72%, respectively, over the same periods in the prior fiscal year. The last four quarters have been our largest four individual EMEIA bookings quarters. North America was the largest order contributing region in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, also recording one of our largest quarterly orders in our history for this region. Orders in North America included approximately $8.0 million of equipment associated with a new plant expansion by a significant North American potato processor. Total orders for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 also included orders of $8.0 million associated with multiple global projects from another major world-wide potato processor.

~~Gross~~Orders ~~profit~~of ~~for~~$40.1 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~was~~were $~~15.~~7.6 million, ~~compared~~or to23%, ~~$10.7~~higher ~~million~~than in the ~~corresponding~~first ~~period~~quarter ~~last~~new orders of $32.5 million a year ago. ~~Gross~~ Orders ~~margin~~for inprocess systems during the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017,~~2018 asincreased a$9.0 ~~percentage~~million, ofor ~~net sales~~65%, ~~increased~~ to 35$22.2%9 ~~compared~~million tofrom ~~the 29~~$13.4%9 ~~reported~~million in the ~~corresponding~~comparable quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2017. The ~~gross~~increase ~~margin~~in ~~percentage~~orders for process systems occurred across most product types. Automated inspection systems orders decreased $2.9 million, or 26%, during the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~was~~to ~~higher~~$8.4 ~~primarily~~million ~~due~~compared to a$11.3 ~~more~~million ~~favorable~~in ~~product~~the ~~mix~~first ~~and~~quarter ~~improvements~~of ~~and~~fiscal ~~efficiencies~~2017. Orders infor ~~both~~automation ~~the~~inspection ~~process~~ systems ~~and~~decreased primarily ~~automated~~for ~~inspection~~upgrade ~~systems~~and ADR product ~~lines~~types. ~~The~~Orders ~~gross~~for ~~margin~~parts ~~percentage~~and service were $8.8 million, or 21% higher than the orders in the ~~fourth~~first quarter of fiscal 2017 isof ~~expected~~$7.3 tomillion. ~~decrease~~Orders ~~moderately~~overall aswere ~~compared~~up toprimarily in the ~~percentage~~North inAmerican ~~the~~and ~~third~~Asia-Pacific ~~quarter~~regions ofand ~~fiscal~~most ~~2017~~significantly in the potato market.

~~Operating~~Gross ~~expenses~~profit ~~of $10.8 million~~ for the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~were~~was 24$8.2%6 ofmillion, ~~net sales~~ compared to $8.9.2 million ~~for~~in the ~~third~~corresponding period last year. Gross margin in the first quarter of fiscal ~~2016~~2018, ~~and~~as ~~24.5%~~a percentage of net sales., ~~The~~decreased ~~increased~~to ~~operating~~27.4% ~~expenses~~compared ~~were~~to ~~primarily~~ the ~~result~~33.7% ofreported ~~increased~~in ~~net~~the ~~sales~~corresponding ~~and~~quarter ~~related~~of ~~sales~~fiscal ~~commission~~2017. The asdecrease ~~well~~in asthe ~~increased~~gross ~~personnel~~margin ~~costs. Total~~percentage ~~operating~~for ~~expenses in~~ the ~~fourth~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~are~~was ~~expected~~primarily due to ~~decrease~~a ~~slightly~~large ~~over~~factory ~~the~~underutilization ~~expense~~variance ~~levels~~as ina ~~the~~result ~~third~~of ~~quarter~~the timing of ~~fiscal~~specific ~~2017~~customer orders and higher than normal customer support costs on a few important projects.

~~Other~~Operating ~~expense~~expenses of $9.7 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~was~~were ~~$326,000,~~31.0% of net sales compared to $~~228,000~~9.1 ~~for~~million ~~the~~and ~~corresponding~~33.4% ~~period~~of innet ~~fiscal~~sales ~~2016,~~for ~~and~~the ~~increased~~first ~~primarily~~quarter ~~due~~of tofiscal 2017. The increased ~~foreign~~operating ~~exchange~~expenses ~~losses~~were inprimarily the ~~third~~result ~~quarter~~ of ~~fiscal~~increased ~~2017~~net assales ~~compared~~and torelated ~~the~~sales ~~prior~~commission ~~year's~~as ~~third~~well ~~fiscal~~as ~~quarter~~increased personnel costs.

~~The~~Other ~~net~~expense ~~earnings~~ for the first quarter ~~ended~~of ~~June 30,~~fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~were~~was $~~3.0 million~~210,000, orcompared to $~~0.47~~78,000 ~~per diluted share. The net earnings~~ for the corresponding period ~~last~~in ~~year~~fiscal ~~were $1.0 million~~2017, orand ~~$0.16~~increased ~~per~~primarily ~~diluted~~due ~~share. The~~to ~~increase~~foreign inexchange ~~net~~losses ~~earnings~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 as compared to ~~the~~foreign ~~third~~exchange ~~quarter~~gains ofin ~~fiscal 2016 was primarily~~ the ~~result~~prior ~~of increased~~year's ~~net~~first ~~sales and~~fiscal ~~improved gross profit margins, partially offset by higher operating expenses~~quarter.

~~For~~Income tax expense was adversely affected in the ~~nine~~first ~~months~~quarter ~~ended~~of ~~June 30~~fiscal 2018 due to reductions in the corporate income tax rate enacted in December in both the United States and Belgium. As a result of these rate reductions, ~~2017~~in the first quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company reduced the carrying value of its net deferred tax assets and ~~2016~~liabilities in the United States and Belgium by approximately $1.2 million which was charged to income tax expense. The Company estimates that its effective tax rate for fiscal 2018, exclusive of adjustments due to these enacted rate changes, will be approximately 25%.

~~Net~~The ~~sales~~net inloss for the ~~first~~quarter ~~nine~~ended ~~months~~December 31, ~~of fiscal~~ 2017 ~~increased~~were by $92.81 million, or ~~11%, to~~ $990.432 ~~million~~per ~~compared~~diluted ~~to $89~~share.~~5 million for the same period in fiscal 2016.~~ The ~~higher~~ net ~~sales~~earnings ~~occurred most significantly in the European region. Net sales increased most significantly in the potato market. International sales~~ for the ~~more~~corresponding ~~recent nine-month~~ period ~~were~~last ~~60% of net sales compared to 54% for the nine-month period of fiscal 2016. Increases in total net sales for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 compared to the same period in the prior~~ year ~~occurred most significantly in automated inspection systems sales which~~ were up $~~8.1~~15,000, ~~million~~ or ~~30%. The increase in automated inspection systems was in both belt-fed and chute-fed products and upgrade products. Process systems sales were up~~ $1.0 ~~million or 2%~~. ~~Parts~~00 ~~and~~per ~~service~~diluted ~~sales were up $0~~share.8 The ~~million or 4%. Process systems represented 42% of~~ net ~~sales~~loss in the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 compared to ~~46% of net sales in~~ the first ~~nine~~quarter ~~months~~ of fiscal ~~2016. Automated inspection systems sales represented 36% of net sales in the first nine months of fiscal~~ 2017, ~~compared~~was ~~to 31% of net sales in~~ the ~~first~~result ~~nine months~~ of ~~fiscal 2016.~~ ~~Parts~~increased ~~and service sales were 22% of~~ net sales inbeing ~~the~~offset ~~first~~by ~~nine~~lower ~~months~~gross ofprofit ~~fiscal~~margins, ~~2017~~higher ~~compared~~operating toexpenses ~~23%~~and inincreased ~~the~~income ~~first~~tax ~~nine months of fiscal 2016~~expense.

Orders for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased $17.9 million, or 19%, to $110.2 million compared to orders of $92.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2016. Orders for automated inspection systems increased $9.9 million, or 35%, to $37.8 million compared to $27.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2016. Orders for automated inspection systems increased most significantly for upgrades, ADR and belt-fed product lines, partially offset by small decreases for chute-fed product lines. Orders for process systems increased $6.5 million, or 15%, to $50.0 million compared to $43.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2016. Orders for process systems increased for most product lines. Orders for parts and service were $22.4 million, up $1.5 million, or 7%, from $20.9 million in the prior year. The overall increase in orders as compared to the prior year occurred particularly in the potato market. Orders were up most significantly in Europe, partially offset by a small decrease in North America.

Gross profit for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 was $34.0 million compared to $26.1 million in the corresponding period last year. Gross margin for the first nine months of fiscal 2017, as a percentage of net sales, was 34.3% as compared to 29.2% reported for the same period of fiscal 2016. The gross margin percentage for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased primarily

due to a more favorable product mix and improvements and efficiencies in both the process systems and automated inspection systems product lines.

Operating expenses of $29.1 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 were 29.3% of net sales compared with $27.4 million, or 30.6%, of net sales for the same period of fiscal 2016. Operating expenses for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 were higher than the operating expenses for the first nine months of fiscal 2016 due primarily to increased net sales and related sales commission as well as increased personnel costs, partially offset by the non-recurrence of $0.7 million of restructuring charges incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 and lower amortization charges.

Other expense for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 was $647,000 compared to other expense of $758,000 for the corresponding period in fiscal 2016 primarily due to lower interest expense and lower bank charges.

The income tax benefit for the first nine months of fiscal 2016 was increased by $106,000, related to expenditures in fiscal 2015, due to the retroactive renewal of the research and development tax credit which occurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2016.

The net earnings for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 were $2.8 million, or $0.44 per diluted share. The net loss for the same period in fiscal 2016 was $1.2 million, or $0.19 per diluted share. The net earnings for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 increased primarily due to higher net sales and higher gross profit, partially offset by higher operating expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2017~~2018, net cash decreased by $04.20 million to $105.3 million on ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 from $109.53 million on September 30, ~~2016~~2017. Cash ~~provided~~used byin operating activities was $12.97 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017. Investing activities consumed $10.79 million of cash. Financing activities used $0.65 million of cash.

Cash ~~provided~~used byin operating activities during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 was $12.97 million. For the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2017~~2018, the net ~~earnings~~loss ~~were~~was $2.81 million. Non-cash items included in the net earnings in the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2017~~2018, such as depreciation, amortization, deferred taxes and share-based compensation, were approximately $42.38 million. In the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2017~~2018, changes in non-cash working capital used $53.25 million of cash in operating activities. The major changes in current assets and liabilities using cash during the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 were increases in inventory of $81.95 million due to the increased backlog and production, increases in accounts receivable of $31.41 million due to the increase in net sales and the timing of shipments and related collections, and andecreases ~~increase of $1.2 million~~ in prepaid expenses due to the timing of payments. These uses were partially offset by increases in customer deposits of $0.7 million due to the increased backlog and timing of collections and shipments, and increases in accounts payable of $20.45 million ~~due to increased production~~ and ~~the timing of payments, increases in~~ accrued payroll liabilities of $20.37 million due to the timing of payments~~, $1~~.8 These ~~million~~uses ofwere ~~increases~~partially inoffset ~~other~~by ~~accrued~~decreased ~~liabilities~~prepaid ~~primarily~~expenses ~~due to an increase in deferred income due to timing differences between invoicing~~ and ~~delivery~~other ofassets ~~goods and services, and $0.9 million in increases in income tax payable~~ due to ~~increased net earnings and~~ the timing of payments.

For the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017, $12.54 million of cash was used in operating activities, comprised of a net ~~loss~~earnings of $~~1.2 million~~15,000; non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization, deferred taxes and share-based compensation included in the net ~~loss~~earnings were $4.1.2 million; and changes in non-cash working capital used $43.46 million. The primary changes in the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 as compared to the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2016~~2017 were the ~~increased~~ net ~~earnings~~loss ~~and~~partially ~~increases~~offset ~~in cash provided~~ by ~~working~~decreased ~~capital. Significant~~deferred changes in working capital included increased use of cash for inventory and prepaid expenses, and a decrease in cash used for accounts payable, accrual payroll, other liabilities, decreases in accounts receivable, and increased customer depositstaxes.

Net cash used in investing activities was $1.7 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2017 compared to $1.7 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2016. Cash used for investing activities in the fiscal 2017 period related entirely to capital expenditures. 21

Net cash used byin ~~financing~~investing activities ~~during~~was $0.9 million for the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2017~~2018 ~~was $630,000,~~ compared ~~with~~to ~~net cash provided by financing activities of~~ $~~262,000 during the corresponding period in fiscal 2016~~0. ~~Net~~4 ~~cash~~million ~~used~~for ~~in financing activities during~~ the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal 2017 primarily resulted from $447,000 of repayments of long-term debt, and $214,000 of payroll taxes paid in connection with stock surrenders related to compensatory stock awards, partially offset by $31,000 of proceeds from the issuance of common stock. Cash used infor ~~financing~~investing activities ~~during~~in the ~~first nine months of~~ fiscal ~~2016~~2018 ~~resulted~~period ~~mainly from payments on long-term debt of $534,000 and payroll taxes of $255,000 paid in connection with stock surrenders~~ related entirely to ~~compensatory~~capital ~~stock awards~~expenditures, ~~partially~~primarily ~~offset~~for bymanufacturing ~~$37,000~~equipment ofand ~~proceeds~~information ~~from~~systems ~~the~~software ~~issuance~~and ~~of common stock, offset by a net $1~~hardware.~~0 million provided by short-term borrowings.~~

22Net cash used by financing activities during the first three months of fiscal 2018 was $497,000, compared with net cash provided by financing activities of $366,000 during the corresponding period in fiscal 2017. Net cash used in financing activities during the first three months of fiscal 2018 primarily resulted from $120,000 of repayments of long-term debt, and $387,000 of payroll taxes paid in connection with stock surrenders related to compensatory stock awards, partially offset by $10,000 of proceeds from the issuance of common stock. Cash used in financing activities during the first three months of fiscal 2017 resulted mainly from payments on long-term debt of $163,000 and payroll taxes of $212,000 paid in connection with stock surrenders related to compensatory stock awards, partially offset by $9,000 of proceeds from the issuance of common stock.

Our domestic credit facility provides for a maximum of $20.3 million consisting of a three-year term loan of $5.3 million and revolving loans up to the lesser of $15.0 million or a borrowing base calculated based on the outstanding amount of our eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory. The credit facility also provides for a credit sub-facility of up to $4.0 million for standby letters of credit. The credit facility matures on July 19, 2018. The revolving credit facility bears interest, at our option, at either the lender's base lending rate or LIBOR using a tiered structure depending on our achievement of a specified financial ratio. Our base lending rate option is the lender's base lending rate plus 0.75%, 1.00% or 1.25% per annum. Our LIBOR option is LIBOR plus 2.25%, 2.50% or 2.75%. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the interest rate would have been 3.4882% based on the lowest of the available alternative rates. The term loan bears interest, at our option, at either the lender's base lending rate plus 1.75% or the one-, two-, or three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25%. We have also simultaneously entered into an interest rate swap agreement with the lender to fix the term loan interest rate at 6.20%. The credit facility is secured by our receivables, equipment and fixtures, inventory, general intangibles, subsidiary stock, securities, investment property, financial assets, real property, and certain other assets. The credit facility contains covenants related to minimum liquidity levels and certain financial covenants that will be applicable only if we do not exceed certain calculated total unrestricted cash and credit availability or an event of default occurs. The credit facility permits capital expenditures to a certain level and contains customary default and acceleration provisions. The credit facility also restricts, above certain levels, acquisitions, incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of dividends and lease expenditures. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, we had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving line of credit and $10.67 million of outstanding standby letters of credit.

Our Belgian subsidiary has a credit accommodation with a commercial bank in Belgium. This credit accommodation totals €2.7 million ($3.13 million) and includes an operating line of €800,000 ($01.90 million), a bank guarantee facility of €500,000 ($0.6 million), and loan agreement provisions of €1.4 million ($1.67 million). The operating line and bank guarantee facility are secured by all of the subsidiary's current assets. The Belgian operating line bears interest at the bank's prime rate plus 1.25%. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the interest rate was 9.75%. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the subsidiary had no borrowings under the operating line~~. At~~ ~~June 30,~~or ~~2017, the subsidiary had a~~ loan ~~outstanding under the loan~~ agreement provisions ~~totaling €67,000 ($76,000)~~. ~~The fixed interest rate on this loan was 3.98% . The loan matures in November 2017.~~ At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the subsidiary had no bank guarantees outstanding under the bank guarantee facility.

Our continuing contractual obligations and commercial commitments existing on ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 are as follows:

Payments due by period (in thousands)

Contractual Obligations (1)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 – 3 years

4 – 5 years

After 5 years

Long-term debt

4,~~698~~446

~~429~~4,446

~~4,269~~

—

Interest on long-term debt (2)

~~321~~269

~~277~~269

—

Operating leases

4,~~704~~435

1,~~351~~472

21,~~112~~963

~~785~~674

~~456~~326

Total contractual cash obligations

9,~~723~~150

26,~~057~~187

61,~~425~~963

~~785~~674

~~456~~326

(1) We also have $8689,000 of contractual obligations related to uncertain tax positions for which the timing and amount of payment cannot be reasonably estimated due to the nature of the uncertainties and the unpredictability of jurisdictional examinations in relation to the statute of limitations.


⁽²⁾	Includes the effect of the interest-rate swap agreement that fixed the interest rate at 6.20%.

We anticipate that current cash balances, ongoing cash flows from operations, and borrowing capacity under currently available operating credit lines will be sufficient to fund our operating needs for the foreseeable future. At June 30, 2017, we had standby letters of credit totaling $1.6 million, which includes secured bank guarantees under our domestic credit facility. If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, these bank guarantees and letters of credit may become our liabilities. We have no off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions, or arrangements or relationships with “special purpose entities.”22

We anticipate that current cash balances, ongoing cash flows from operations, and borrowing capacity under currently available operating credit lines will be sufficient to fund our operating needs for the foreseeable future. At December 31, 2017, we had standby letters of credit totaling $0.7 million, which includes secured bank guarantees under our domestic credit facility. If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, these bank guarantees and letters of credit may become our liabilities. We have no off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions, or arrangements or relationships with “special purpose entities.”


ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We have assessed our exposure to market risks for our financial instruments and have determined that our exposure to such risks is generally limited to those affected by the value of the U.S. dollar compared to the Euro and to a lesser extent the Australian dollar and Mexican peso.

The terms of sales to European customers are typically denominated in Euros. We expect that our standard terms of sale to international customers, other than those in Europe, will continue to be denominated in U.S. dollars, although as we expand our international operations, transactions denominated in the local currencies of these countries may increase. As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, management estimates that a 10% change in foreign exchange rates would affect net earnings before taxes by approximately $~~160~~167,000 on an annual basis as a result of the conversion to U.S. dollars of cash, accounts receivable, loans to foreign subsidiaries, and sales or other contracts denominated in foreign currencies. These changes would positively affect net earnings if the U.S. dollar weakens on world markets and negatively affect net earnings if the U.S. dollar strengthens on world markets. We assess our currency exchange risk on an on-going basis and may enter into forward contracts to minimize such risk. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, we held a 30-day forward contract for €10.5 million ($10.76 million).

As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the U.S. dollar lost approximately 12% in value against the Euro compared to its value at September 30, ~~2016~~2017. During the ~~nine-~~three month period ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, changes in the value of the U.S dollar against the Euro ranged between a 12% loss and a 71% gain as compared to the value at September 30, ~~2016~~2017. The U.S. dollar also lost in value against ~~most~~ other relevant foreign currencies, except for the ~~Chinese~~Mexican ~~yuan~~peso and Australian dollar, during the first ~~nine~~three months of fiscal ~~2017~~2018. The effect of these fluctuations on our operations and financial results during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 were:

• Translation adjustments of $~~277~~491,000, net of income tax, were recognized as a component of comprehensive income as a result of converting the Euro-denominated balance sheets of our European subsidiaries into U.S. dollars and, to a lesser extent, the Australian dollar balance sheet of our Australian subsidiary, and the Peso balance sheets of our Mexican subsidiaries.

• Foreign exchange losses of $~~205~~50,000, net of the effects of forward exchange contracts settled during the period, were recognized in the other income and expense section of the consolidated statement of operations as a result of conversion of Euro and other foreign currency denominated receivables, intercompany loans, and cash carried on the balance sheet of the U.S. operations, as well as the result of the conversion of other non-functional currency receivables, payables and cash carried on the balance sheets of the European, Australian, and Mexican operations.

When the U.S. dollar weakens on the world markets, our market and economic outlook for international sales could be positively affected as products sold to international customers become relatively less expensive to those customers. Conversely, a relatively stronger U.S. dollar makes our U.S.-manufactured goods more expensive to international customers when denominated in U.S. dollars or potentially more profitable to us when denominated in a foreign currency. On the other hand, materials or components imported into the U.S. may be less expensive. Our Netherlands-based subsidiary transacts business primarily in Euros and does not have significant exports to the U.S., but does import a significant portion of its products from its U.S.-based parent company. These imports from the U.S. are expected to decrease in the ~~near~~ future as we expand our manufacturing capacity in Europe. Our Belgian-based subsidiary also transacts business primarily in Euros and has significant exports to the U.S.-based parent company, which are ~~also~~ expected to decrease in the ~~near~~ future as manufacturing of these U.S. destined products will be done in the U.S.

Interest Rate Risk. Under our domestic credit facility, we are able to borrow at either (a) the lender’s prime rate plus 75, 100 or 125 basis points or (b) at LIBOR plus 225, 250 or 275 basis points depending on our achievement of a specified financial ratio. Our Belgian subsidiary may borrow on our Belgian credit facility at the lender's prime rate plus 1.25%. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, we had no borrowings under these arrangements. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, interest rates applicable to these variable rate credit facilities ranged from 3.2048% to 9.75% based on the lowest of the available alternative rates. At ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, the rate would have been 3.4882% on our domestic credit facility and would have been 9.75% on our Belgian credit facility. The term loan on our headquarters building bears interest, at the Company's option, at the lender's base rate plus 175 basis points or the one-, two- or three-month LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points, but we simultaneously entered into an interest rate swap agreement with the lender to fix the interest rate at 6.20%. ~~Long-term fixed-rate borrowings at our Belgian subsidiary bear interest at 3.98%.~~ As of ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, management estimates that a 100 basis point change in these interest rates would not affect net income before taxes because we had no borrowings outstanding under our variable interest rate credit facilities and the interest rate swap effectively converts our variable rate term loan facility into a fixed-rate facility.


ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures at ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and concluded that such controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We will be adopting ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" effective October 1, 2018. We do not believe the adoption of this new guidance will have a material effect on our results of operations. Consequently, we do not believe the adoption of this new guidance will require significant changes in our internal controls and procedures over financial reporting and disclosures. However, due to the nature of the new guidance, we may be making enhancements or modifications to existing internal controls and procedures to ensure compliance with the new guidance.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table provides information about purchases made by us or on our behalf during the quarter ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 of equity securities registered by us under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1-30, 2017	—	—		—	—
October 1-31, 2017	9,521	$	18.89	—	—
May 1-31, 2017	—	—		—	—
November 1-30, 2017	—	—		—	—
June 1-30, 2017	109	$	12.90	—	—
December 1-31, 2017	9,830	20.82		—	—
Total	~~109~~19,351	$	1219.9087	—	429,202	(2)

(1) ~~Includes~~Consists of shares of restricted stock surrendered to satisfy tax withholding obligations by plan participants under our employee stock incentive plan. The shares were subsequently canceled.


⁽²⁾	We initiated a new stock repurchase plan effective May 30, 2012. We were authorized to repurchase up to 500,000 shares of our common stock under the program. The timing of any repurchases and the exact number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by us and will depend on market conditions and other factors. The program does not incorporate a fixed expiration date.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

As previously disclosed, on January 25, 2018, we entered into a definitive merger agreement with Duravant LLC and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries pursuant to which such subsidiary will commence a tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company for $26.75 per share in cash in a transaction valued at approximately $175 million. The transaction is expected to close in the second fiscal quarter of 2018, subject to the tender and acceptance of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and other customary closing conditions. Additional information about the transaction is set forth in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2018.


ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS

31.1	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	The following materials from Key Technology, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and September 30, ~~2016~~2017, (ii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three- ~~and nine-~~months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016, (iii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for three- ~~and nine-~~months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016, (iv) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016, and (v) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017.

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC.
		(Registrant)
Date:	~~August~~February 413, ~~2017~~2018	By /s/ John J. Ehren
		John J. Ehren
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	~~August~~February 413, ~~2017~~2018	By /s/ Jeffrey T. Siegal
		Jeffrey T. Siegal
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

KEY TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~DECEMBER 3031, 2017

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
31.1	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	The following materials from Key Technology, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and September 30, ~~2016~~2017, (ii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three- ~~and nine-~~months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016, (iii) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for three- ~~and nine-~~months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016, (iv) Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017 and 2016, and (v) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~June~~December 3031, 2017.

Filing Compare · KEY TECHNOLOGY INC