10-Q 1 t305694.txt UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 [ ] Transition Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period _______________ to _______________ Commission File Number 000-21391 --------- TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter) NEVADA 95-4699061 ------------------------------- --------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 888 SEVENTH AVENUE, 17TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10106 -------------------------------------------- ----- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (805) 512-9511 -------------- NOT APPLICABLE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Former name, former address and former fiscal year end, if changed since last report) Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes [X] No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer' and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non -accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X] (do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) [ ] Yes [ X ] No State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 550,513,491 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of NOVEMBER 6, 2009. TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. INDEX TO FORM 10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 PAGE NUMBER PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements: Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 4 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 5 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 6 Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations 25 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk NA Item 4. Controls and Procedures 34 PART II -OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings 35 Item 1A. Risk Factors NA Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 35 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities NA Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders NA Item 5. Other Information 35 Item 6. Exhibits 36 SIGNATURES 37 2 PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements. 6 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited - Expressed in US Dollars) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES NATURE OF BUSINESS Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiaries (the "Company") engineer, develop and market products designed to enhance performance and reduce emissions of internal combustion engines. The Company's operations have been financed principally through a combination of private and public sales of equity and debt securities. If the Company is unable to raise equity capital or generate revenue to meet its working capital needs, it may have to cease operating and seek relief under appropriate statutes. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern and realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business and do not reflect any adjustment which would be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. GOING CONCERN The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered net operating losses in recent periods, has an accumulated deficit of $135,472,581 at September 30, 2009 and a total capital deficit of $8,898,025 at September 30, 2009. It has used most of its available cash in its operating activities in recent years, has a significant working capital deficiency and is subject to lawsuits brought against it by other parties. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The interim financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and with the instruction to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 included in the Company's 10-K Annual Report. The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim reports. Results of operations for the interim periods are not indicative of annual results. 7 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements, stated in United States dollars, include the accounts of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Turbodyne Systems, Inc., Turbodyne Germany Ltd., Electronic Boosting Systems, Inc. and Pacific Baja Light Metals Corp. ("Pacific Baja"). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation. FASB ACCOUNTING STANDARDS CODIFICATION The Company follows accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, commonly referred to as the "FASB". The FASB sets generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that the Company follows to ensure consistent reporting of its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. References to GAAP issued by the FASB in these footnotes are to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, sometimes referred to as the Codification or ASC. The FASB finalized the Codification effective for periods ending on or after September 15, 2009. Prior FASB standards like FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, are no longer being issued by the FASB. For further discussion of the Codification see "FASB Codification Discussion" in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (commonly referred to as MD&A) elsewhere in this report. DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives as follows: Computers and measurement equipment - 3 years Machinery and equipment - 7 to 15 years Furniture and fixtures - 5 to 10 years VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS The Company periodically and at least, annually, reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets for indications of impairment in value and recognizes impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to such assets. Long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are to be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost of sale whether reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. No impairment was required to be recognized during 2009 and 2008. 8 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company reports assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value using a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows: o Level 1 -- Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. o Level 2 -- Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. o Level 3 -- Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. An asset's or liability's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. At each reporting period, we perform a detailed analysis of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. All assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs or instruments which trade infrequently and therefore have little or no price transparency are classified as Level 3. All financial liabilities that are measured at fair value have been segregated into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the table below. The Company has no financial assets and non-financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. 9 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED RECOGNITION OF REVENUE License fee revenue is recognized over the term of the license agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2003, $400,000 in license fees were deferred and are being amortized over 18 years. As a result, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 $16,668 ($16,668 in 2008) of licensing fees was recognized as income. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE Earnings (loss) per share is computed in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 260, "Earnings Per Share". Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in earnings of an entity. In a loss year, dilutive common equivalent shares are excluded from the loss per share calculation as the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, 12,675 preferred shares convertible into 1,267,500 shares of common stock and options and warrants to purchase 17,274,000 and 50,617,210 shares of common stock, convertible notes to purchase 29,415,873 shares of common stock were outstanding during the period. The weighted average cumulative equivalent shares of 550,513,491 were included in the denominator for 2009 computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. No other adjustments were made for purposes of per share calculations. For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, 12,675 preferred shares convertible into 1,267,500 shares of common stock and options and warrants to purchase 18,022,000 and 42,556,106 shares of common stock, convertible notes to purchase 20,191,110 shares of common stock were outstanding during the period. The weighted average cumulative equivalent shares of 549,850,487 were included in the denominator for 2009 computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. No other adjustments were made for purposes of per share calculations. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 10 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the fair value method in accordance with ASC Topic 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation," which requires the Company to establish assumptions and estimates of the weighted-average fair value of stock options granted, as well as using a valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock-based awards. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Research and development costs related to present and future products are charged to operations in the period incurred. Previously, research prototypes were sold and proceeds reflected by reductions in our research and development costs. As new technology pre-production manufacturing units are produced and related non-recurring engineer services are delivered we will recognize the sales proceeds as revenue. INCOME TAXES The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as current and non-current based on their characteristics. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as current and non-current based on their characteristics. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. LEGAL FEES The Company expenses legal fees in connection with litigation as incurred. 11 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ASC Topic 323, "Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures," establishes standards to measure all changes in equity that result from transactions and other economic events other than transactions with owners. Comprehensive income is the total of net earnings (loss) and all other non-owner changes in equity. Except for net earnings (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments, the Company does not have any transactions and other economic events that qualify as comprehensive income. As foreign currency translation adjustments were immaterial to the Company's consolidated financial statements, net earnings (loss) approximated comprehensive income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 2009, the FASB established the "FASB Accounting Standards Codification" (Codification) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification is effective for the Company this period ended September 30, 2009 and references to pre-codification statements have been removed or replaced in the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets," which has not been added to the Codification. It is an amendment of ASC Topics 310 (Receivables), 405 (Liabilities), 470 (Debt), 740 (Income Taxes) and 810 (Consolidation) as they pertain SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," and requires entities to provide more information about sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the seller retains some risk to the assets. This statement will improve the relevance, representation faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets. It will also take into account the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows, and a transferor's continuing involvement. SFAS No. 166 is effective for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. This statement is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010 and is expected to have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. 12 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB interpretation No. 46(R)," which has not been added to the Codification. It establishes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or not controlled through voting should be consolidated. This statement improves financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities, which addresses the effects on certain provisions of ASC Topic 810 (Consolidation) as it pertains to FASB interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in FASB No. 166, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets," and constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of Interpretation 46(R). SFAS No. 167 is effective for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. This statement is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010 and is expected to have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In August 2009, the FASB published Accounting Standards Update 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. It clarifies that in circumstances in which a quoted market price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one of several acceptable valuation techniques. ASU 2009-05 also clarifies (i) that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustments to other inputs relating the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability, and (ii) that both a "quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date" and the "quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in a active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required" are Level 1 fair value measurements. ASU 2009-05 is effective in the fourth quarter of 2009. The Company has not yet determined the impact of the adoption of ASU 2009-05 on its financial statements. In September 2009, the FASB published FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)". It amends Subtopic 820-10, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures--Overall," to permit a reporting entity to measure the fair value of certain investments on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent). It also requires new disclosures, by major category of investments, about the attributes includes of investments within the scope of this amendment to the Codification. The provisions of ASU 2009-12 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2009-12 are not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 13 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In October 2009, the FASB published FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, "Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) - Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements." It addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this guidance amends the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, "Revenue Recognition-Multiple-Element Arrangements," for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The provisions of ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2009-13 are not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In October 2009, the FASB published FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-14 Software (Topic 985) - Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include Software Elements." It changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Under this guidance, tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product's essential functionality are excluded from the software revenue guidance in Subtopic 985-605, "Software-Revenue Recognition." In addition, hardware components of a tangible product containing software components are always excluded from the software revenue guidance. The provisions of ASU 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2009-14 are not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In October 2009, the FASB published FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-15, "Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing." It includes amendments to Topic 470, Debt, (Subtopic 470-20), and Topic 260, "Earnings per Share" (Subtopic 260-10), to provide guidance on share-lending arrangements entered into on an entity's own shares in contemplation of a convertible debt offering or other financing. The provisions of ASU 2009-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years FOR ARRANGEMENTS OUTSTANDING AS OF THE BEGINNING OF THOSE YEARS. Retrospective application is required for such arrangements. The provisions of ASU 2009-15 is effective FOR ARRANGEMENTS ENTERED INTO ON (NOT OUTSTANDING) or after the beginning of the first reporting period that begins on or after June 15, 2009. Certain transition disclosures are also required. Early application is not permitted. The provisions of ASU 2009-15 are not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 14 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 2. SHARE CAPITAL Transactions not disclosed elsewhere in these consolidated interim financial statements are as follows: a) Authorized Capital At the Annual General Meeting held on June 30, 2004, the shareholders approved an increase of authorized capital to 1,000,000,000 common shares. In 2003, 150,000 of the 1 million preferred shares were designated as Series X preferred shares. These shares have a par value of $0.001 per share with each share being convertible into 100 common shares at the discretion of the holder. As of September 30, 2009, 12,675 of Series X preferred shares convertible into 1,267,500 common shares are outstanding. In addition to outstanding shares of common stock, options and warrants described in these notes; additional shares are issuable in connection with the change of control transaction in September 2005 in the event the Company issues any securities directly or indirectly related to pre-merger events. b) During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for payment of services. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 the Company issued 162,054,057 shares of common stock, 142,114,317 for conversion of notes and interest payable, 13,939,740 for additional merger shares and 6,000,000 for payment of services. c) Stock Options The determination of fair value of share-based payment awards to employees, directors and non-employees on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model is affected by the Company's stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviours. Management has used historical data to estimate forfeitures. The risk-free rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates in effect during the corresponding period of grant. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock price. 15 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 2. SHARE CAPITAL - CONTINUED c) Stock Options - Continued Grant of Stock Options to Non-employees for Services During 2006 and 2007, we granted warrants to purchase 78,200,000 shares of our common stock to various consultants that we deemed essential to our operations. Details of the consultant warrants for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 are as follows: Total consultant warrants granted 78,200,000 Vested prior to January 1, 2009 (22,805,549) Vested January through September 30, 2009 (3,691,661) Cancelled January through December 2008 (22,044,436) ----------- Warrants not vested 29,658,354 =========== During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 the Company using the Black-Scholes model recorded $17,979 ($119,075 in 2008) of compensation expense, relating to the vesting of stock warrants previously issued to non-employees for services. The non cash warrant expense is allocated with $16,171 ($86,209 in 2008) to general and administrative expenses and $1,808 ($32,866 in 2008) to research and development. The estimated fair value of warrants issued to non-employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 ranged from $0.0032 to $0.0088. Assumptions used to value the warrants: expected dividend yield Nil%; expected volatility ranging from 113.23% to 139.34%; risk-free interest rate ranging from 2.27% to 3.19% and an expected life of 7 years. d) Stock Purchase Warrants At September 30, 2009 the Company had 50,617,210 share purchase warrants outstanding and exercisable. These warrants were issued in connection with private placements, non-employee compensation and other means of financing. The holders of these warrants are entitled to receive one share of common stock of the Company for one warrant exercised. The warrants have exercise prices ranging from $0.01 to $0.04 per share with a weighted average exercise price of $0.016 per share and expiration dates between 2011 and 2016. Details of share purchase warrants for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 are as follows: 16 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 2. SHARE CAPITAL - CONTINUED

At September 30, 2009, the following is a summary of share purchase warrants outstanding and exercisable: Weighted- Average Weighted Remaining Average Contractual Exercise Exercise Price Number Life (Years) Price -------------------------------------------------------------------------- $0.01 28,663,882 5.05 $0.01 $0.025 - 0.04 21,953,328 2.95 0.02 -------------- 50,617,210 4.14 $0.02 ============== 3. CURRENT LOANS PAYABLE September December 30, 2009 31, 2008 ----------------------- Unsecured, non-interest bearing loan payable, due on demand to stockholders and other parties $ 138,600 $ 138,600 Note payable, 5% per annum (see note 6) 52,629 50,905 Convertible notes payable 348,910 318,722 ----------------------- Total Current Loans Payable $ 540,139 $ 508,227 ======================= 17 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 3. CURRENT LOANS PAYABLE - CONTINUED As of September 30, 2009, convertible notes consist of:

18 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 3. LOANS PAYABLE - CONTINUED For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company issued $300,000, $691,000 and $660,000, respectively, of convertible notes. All of the convertible notes were issued with detachable warrants to purchase 6,000,000, 13,820,000, and 13,200,000 shares of the Company's common stock, respectively. In recording the transaction, the Company allocated the value of the proceeds to the convertible notes and the warrants based on their relative fair values. Fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. It was also determined that the convertible notes contained a beneficial conversion feature since the fair market value of the common stock issuable upon the conversion of the notes exceeded the value allocated to the notes. The value of the beneficial conversion feature and the value of the warrants have been recorded as a discount to convertible notes and are being amortized over the term of the notes using the straight-line method. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, amortization of the discount was $-0- and $414,915, respectively. As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the remaining balance of the beneficial conversion feature was $-0- and $19,232, and detachable warrants was $-0- and $13,580, respectively. In September 2006, the Company offered to decrease the note conversion price to $0.005 per share if the note holders exercised their warrants at the reduced exercise price of $0.010 by September 30, 2006. 11,900,000 of the warrants were exercised. In consideration for the reduction of conversion price, the maturity of the notes extended for another year. The modification of conversion terms was substantial such that it was considered an extinguishment of debt. Accordingly, the unamortized discount on convertible notes was written off and included in total amortization for 2006. Conversion of notes in 2008 and 2007 also resulted in the write off of the corresponding unamortized discount. In addition, as a result of the inducement to exercise the warrants and to convert the notes, the Company recognized an expense of $-0- and $1,247,657 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital. In February 2007, the Company changed the per share conversion price from $0.005 to $0.020 for new lenders. The notes, issued prior to September 1, 2007, bear interest at 5% and mature within one year from date of issuance. The notes, issued after September 1, 2007, bear interest at 18% and mature within six months from date of issuance. The warrants are to purchase the Company's common stock at $0.025 per share expiring in five years. 19 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 4. LONG-TERM LOANS PAYABLE For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued $150,000 of convertible notes. All of the convertible notes were issued with detachable warrants to purchase 3,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. In recording the transaction, the Company allocated the value of the proceeds to the convertible notes and the warrants based on their relative fair values. Fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. There was no beneficial conversion feature. The Convertible Notes have a two year maturity with 12% annual interest rate payable at maturity or at the time of conversion. The Note may be converted at any time after issuance until the note is paid in full. The conversion price is at a price equal to $.01; provided that Conversion shall be subject to a minimum conversion amount of $10,000, or if less, the remaining Outstanding Obligation. The warrants will have an exercise price of $.01 and a 5 year expiration date. The value of the warrants has been recorded as a discount to convertible notes and is being amortized over the term of the notes using the straight-line method. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, amortization of the discount was $7,201. As of September 30, 2009, the remaining balance of the detachable warrants was $27,056. As of September 30, 2009 the accrued interest on the convertible notes is $7,623. 5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company is party to various legal claims and lawsuits that have arisen in the normal course of business. There have been no material changes in the status of these matters since the issuance of the most recent audited annual financial statements. LITIGATION a) TST, Inc. In March 2000, TST, Inc. ("TST"), a vendor to a subsidiary of Pacific Baja (Note 5(b)) filed an action against the Company alleging that in order to induce TST to extend credit to a subsidiary of Pacific Baja, the Company executed guarantees in favor of TST. TST alleged that the subsidiary defaulted on the credit facility and that the Company is liable as guarantor. Agreed to the immediate entry of judgment against the Company in the amount of $2,068,078 plus interest from the date of entry at the rate of 10% per annum. The amount of this judgment would immediately increase by any amount that TST is compelled by judgment or court order or settlement to return as a preferential transfer in connection with the bankruptcy proceedings of Pacific Baja; and TST cannot execute on its judgment until Turbodyne either: (a) files a voluntary bankruptcy case; (b) is the subject of an involuntary case; or (c) effects an assignment for the benefit of creditors. 20 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - LITIGATION CONTINUED a) TST, Inc. - Continued Any proceeds received by TST or its president from the sale of the issued shares will be automatically applied as a credit against the amount of the judgment against the Company in favor of TST. Prior to March 31, 2004, 147,000 shares issued in connection with the TST settlement had been sold which have reduced the provision for lawsuit settlement by $23,345. At September 30, 2009, the Company has included $4,232,852 ($3,943,328 in 2008) in regard to this matter in provision for lawsuit settlements. It was determined that TST received payment in preference to other creditors before Pacific Baja filed its Chapter 11 petition in bankruptcy. TST and Pacific Baja settled the preference payment issue with TST paying $20,000 to Pacific Baja and TST relinquishing the right to receive $63,000 therefore; $83,000 has also been included in the provision for lawsuit settlements. September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 -------------------------------------- Settlement amount $ 2,068,079 $ 2,068,079 Interest 2,105,118 1,815,594 Preference payment 83,000 83,000 Proceeds of stock sale (23,345) (23,345) -------------------------------------- Total $ 4,232,852 $ 3,943,328 ---------------------------------------------------------------- b) Pacific Baja Bankruptcy In July 1999, a major creditor of the Company's wholly-owned major subsidiary, Pacific Baja, began collection activities against Pacific Baja which threatened Pacific Baja's banking relationship with, and source of financing from, Wells Fargo Bank. As a result, Pacific Baja and its subsidiaries commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings on September 30, 1999. In September 2001, the Pacific Baja Liquidating Trust (the "Trust") commenced action against us in the aforesaid Bankruptcy Court. The Trust was established under the Pacific Baja bankruptcy proceedings for the benefit of the unsecured creditors of Pacific Baja. The Company vigorously contested the Complaint until April 22, 2005 when the Company entered into a stipulation for entry of judgment and assignment in the Pacific Baja bankruptcy proceedings for $500,000 to be issued in common stock or cash or a combination. Additionally the Company assigned to the bankruptcy Trust the rights to $9,500,000 claims under any applicable directors and officers liability insurance policies. The bankruptcy Trust also agreed to a covenant not to execute against the Company regardless of the outcome of the insurance claims. The Company has completed the assignment of its insurance claims, but has not completed the cash/stock payment that was to be paid to the Trust by December 9, 2005. We are negotiating with the Trustee regarding this default. 21 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - CONTINUED c) Former Director A former director of Turbodyne, Erwin Kramer (the "Plaintiff"), represented by his attorney Claus Schmidt, a former attorney of Turbodyne at the time of the alleged claim, filed a legal action in Germany against Turbodyne, our non-operating subsidiary Turbodyne Europe GmbH ("Turbodyne GmbH"), and ex-employees of Turbodyne GmbH, Peter Kitzinski and Marcus Kumbrick (collectively the "Defendants"), with the Regional Frankfurt court (the "German Court") in September, 2004. The Plaintiff claims damages of Euro 245,620 plus 5% interest per annum against the Defendants in respect of actions taken by the Defendants while employed with Turbodyne GmbH. On September 9, 2004, the German Court, on a motion by the Defendants to the suit, dismissed the Plaintiff's claims against Peter Kitzinski and Marcus Kumbrick, and ordered that Turbodyne's patents in Munich be attached pending the resolution of the Plaintiff's claim against Turbodyne and Turbodyne GmbH. On June 13, 2005 the Court in Frankfurt dismissed the claim. The Plaintiff filed an appeal against this judgment with the Higher Regional Court in Frankfurt. The Plaintiff's attorney, Claus Schmidt, also filed similar suits on behalf of Frank Walter and Herbert Taeuber. The German courts are indicating that all three suits need to be filed in the United States not Germany. Presently the suits have not been filed in the United States. We vigorously dispute this claim and have retained German counsel to defend it and seek its dismissal. At September 30, 2009, the Company has included $405,785 in regard to this matter in the provision for lawsuit settlements. d) Crescent Fund, LLC A former consultant brought an action against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for the County of New York for an action entitled CRESCENT FUND, LLC v TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. The action sought $300,000 damages based upon claims for alleged breaches of contract and covenants of good faith and fair dealing allegedly arising because the Company failed to give plaintiff an opinion to sell the 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock received for services. The Company in the action sought the return of such shares and damages based upon plaintiff's breach and fraud based upon the failure to perform any of the duties and obligations required of it under the aforesaid contract which was fraudulently induced. The Company did not anticipate any liability and therefore did not include an amount in the provision for lawsuit settlements. The action has been settled pursuant to which the plaintiff retained a majority of the shares and released the Company from all liability with any payments. e) Other The Company is currently involved in various collection claims and other legal actions. It is not possible at this time to predict the outcome of the legal actions. 22 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS Aspatuck Holdings Ltd. and another entity affiliated with Jason Meyers have advanced an aggregate of $ 46,000 to the Company plus related interest expense of $6,629 for 2009 and $4,904 for 2008. The advances are repayable on demand and bear interest at 5 % per annum. See Note 3 Loan Payable. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the Company also owes Aspatuck Holdings Ltd consulting fees of $387,227 and $344,827, respectively, for the services of Jason Meyers. The Company has included these consulting fees in accounts payable in the balance sheet. The Company has included $30,000 of consulting compensation in the general and administrative expense for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The Company also included $4,684 and $15,248 of non cash warrant expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively. The Company has agreed to pay Aspatuck Holdings, Ltd. $64,000 of the accounts payable owed as funds become available and then $10,000 per month until repaid. The accounts payable is for the services of the primary shareholder of Aspatuck, Jason Meyers. John Adams, co-CEO has advanced an aggregate of $35,000 in convertible notes as a private investor. The notes were due in November 2006 and July 2007 but remain unpaid as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, with total outstanding balance of $41,415 and $40,106, respectively, which includes accrued interest of $6,418 and $5,106, respectively. On June 30, 2009 we issued a certificate for 1,000,000 restricted shares of our common stock to John Adams for the October 2008 through June 30, 2009 representing a portion of the 12,000,000 shares of service based stock according to the Consulting Agreement effective January 1, 2008. The Company recorded $1,889 and $10,000 general and administrative expense for the stock compensation to be issued to John Adams for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the Company owes Debi Kokinos, CFO consulting fees of $82,970 and $41,830, respectively. The Company has included these consulting fees in accounts payable in the balance sheet. The Company has included $19,380 of consulting compensation in the general and administrative expense for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The Company also included $1,405 and $4,574 of non cash warrant expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively. 23 TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED - EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS) SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008 7. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Subsequent to September 30, 2009, the Company issued a convertible note for $50,000. The convertible note was issued with detachable warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The Convertible Note has a two year maturity with 12% annual interest rate payable at maturity or at the time of conversion. The Note may be converted at any time after issuance until the note is paid in full. The conversion price is at a price equal to $.01; provided that Conversion shall be subject to a minimum conversion amount of $10,000, or if less, the remaining Outstanding Obligation. The warrants will have an exercise price of $.01 and a 5 year expiration date. Subsequent to September 30, 2009 the Company entered into Common Stock Purchase Agreements for 25,400,000 shares for a total of $89,900. The proceeds were used for payment of a contract with D. Brown Traktoren, GmbH for the services to the Company of Augustin Thalhofer for the development of the TurboPac. On November 7, 2009 we received notification that The People's Republic of China granted two patents to Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. on July 22, 2009 for Charge Air Systems for Turbocharged Four-Cycle Internal Combustion Engines and Two Stage Charge Air System for Four-Cycle Internal Combustion Engine. The original applications for these patents were filed July 23, 1998. The People's Republic of China represents one of the fastest growing markets for our products. The Company has evaluated its subsequent events through November 16, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued. 24 ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS The information in this discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding the Company's capital needs, business strategy and expectations. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "plan", "intend", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "predict", "potential" or "continue", the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating these statements, you should consider various factors, including the risks outlined in the Risk Factors section below, and, from time to time, in other reports the Company files with the SEC. These factors may cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement. The Company disclaims any obligation to publicly update these statements, or disclose any difference between its actual results and those reflected in these statements. The information constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. As used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the terms "we", "us", "our", "Turbodyne" and "our company" mean Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., unless otherwise indicated. All dollar amounts in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated. PLAN OF OPERATIONS We are an engineering Company and have been engaged, for over ten years, in the design and development of forced-air induction (air-charging) technologies that improve the performance of gas and diesel internal combustion engines. Optimum performance of an internal combustion engine requires a proper ratio of fuel to air. Power available from the engine is reduced when a portion of the fuel is not used. In a wide range of gas and diesel engines additional air is needed to achieve an optimal result. Traditional engineered solutions for this problem use belts or exhaust gas (superchargers or turbochargers) to supply additional air to an engine. Turbodyne, instead, uses electric motors to supply additional air. Because an electric motor can be engaged more quickly, compared to the mechanical delays inherent in a belt or exhaust gas device, Turbodyne's products under development are designed to reduce this `turbolag' and otherwise adds to the effectiveness of gas and diesel engines used in automotive, heavy vehicle, marine, and other internal combustion installations. On November 7, 2009 we received notification that The People's Republic of China granted two patents to Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. on July 22, 2009 for Charge Air Systems for Turbocharged Four-Cycle Internal Combustion Engines and Two Stage Charge Air System for Four-Cycle Internal Combustion Engine. The original applications for these patents were filed July 23, 1998. The People's Republic of China represents one of the fastest growing markets for our products. 25 FINANCING REQUIREMENTS We will require additional financing if we are to continue as a going concern and to finance our business operations. While we have obtained some financing in 2009 we need substantially more capital to complete development and continue our business. There is no assurance that we will be able to raise the required additional capital. In the event that we are unable to raise additional financing on acceptable terms, then we may have to cease operating and seek relief under appropriate statutes. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We believe, however that recent technical developments provide the Company with potential for substantial growth but this will require investment. There is no assurance that we will obtain sufficient funding or otherwise be able to achieve our goals. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES STOCK BASED COMPENSATION The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the fair value method in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation," which requires the Company to establish assumptions and estimates of the weighted-average fair value of stock options granted, as well as using a valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock-based awards. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. FASB CODIFICATION The FASB recognized the complexity of its standard-setting process and embarked on a revised process in 2004 that culminated in the release on July 1, 2009 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, sometimes referred to as the Codification or ASC. The Codification does not change how the Company accounts for its transactions or the nature of related disclosures made. However, when referring to guidance issued by the FASB, the Company refers to topics in the ASC rather than the SFAS or FASB Statements. The above change was made effective by the FASB for periods ending on or after September 15, 2009. We have updated references to GAAP in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to reflect the guidance in the Codification. 26 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

NET REVENUE Three Months Ended September 30 Nine Months Ended September 30 ------------------------------- ------------------------------ Percentage Percentage 2009 2008 Increase 2009 2008 Increase ------------------------------- ------------------------------ License Fee $5,556 $5,556 Nil $16,668 $16,668 Nil We had no revenue in 2009 other than recognition of amortized license fees. During the year ended December 31, 2003, $400,000 in license fees were deferred and amortized over 18 years. As a result, for each of the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, $5,556 of licensing fees was recognized as income. Our continued net losses from operations reflect our continued operating expenses and our inability to generate revenues. We believe that we will not be able to generate any significant revenues from TurboPac(TM) until we complete our production models and enter into commercial arrangements. COST OF SALES We had no sales in 2009 and 2008; therefore we did not have any costs of sales during any portion of these years. 27 OPERATING EXPENSES Due to a lack of funds we reduced our operations in the first and second quarter of 2009 so that operating expenses decreased from the comparable period in 2008 by 43%. The primary components of our operating expenses are outlined in the table below:

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES General and administrative expenses primarily included management compensation costs as well as overhead. The decline of these expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to prior periods in 2008 is due to decreased spending due to lack of financing as well as a corresponding decrease in the non cash warrant expense. Management compensation costs included non cash (i) stock compensation expense of $1,889 and $5,333 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $10,000 and $28,111 in 2008 and (ii) warrant expense of $6,089 and $16,171 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $19,822 and $86,209 in prior periods of 2008. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The decrease in research and development costs in 2009 is due to decreased spending for limited development operations due to a lack of funding and the decrease in the non cash warrant expense amount of $1,808 compared to $32,866 in 2008 as a result of the termination of certain consulting agreements and the decrease in the per share price of the Company's common stock. Our research and development costs related to present and future products are charged to operations in the period incurred. Our research and development activities during 2009 are associated with the development of our TurboPac. On November 7, 2009 we received notification that The People's Republic of China granted two patents to Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. on July 22, 2009 for Charge Air Systems for Turbocharged Four-Cycle Internal Combustion Engines and Two Stage Charge Air System for Four-Cycle Internal Combustion Engine. The original applications for these patents were filed July 23, 1998. The People's Republic of China represents one of the fastest growing markets for our products. LITIGATION EXPENSE The litigation expense is the accrued interest relating to the TST, Inc. settlement. 28 COMPENSATION EXPENSE Grant of Stock Options to Non-employees for Services During 2006 and 2007, we granted warrants to purchase 78,200,000 shares of our common stock to various consultants that we deemed essential to our operations. Details of the consultant warrants for the year ended December 31, 2008 are as follows: Total consultant warrants granted 78,200,000 Vested prior to January 1, 2009 (22,805,549) Vested January through September 30 2009 (3,691,661) Cancelled January through December 2008 (22,044,436) ----------- Warrants not vested 29,658,354 ============ During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 the Company using the Black-Scholes model recorded $17,979 ($119,075 in 2008) of compensation expense, relating to the vesting of stock warrants previously issued to non-employees for services. The non cash warrant expense is allocated with $16,171 ($86,209 in 2008) to general and administrative expenses and $1,808 ($32,866 in 2008) to research and development. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) AND INCOME TAX

29 The Company continues to negotiate with our creditors and trade debt holders on settlement of accounts payable from periods prior to the current management assuming operation of the Company. When achieved, this is represented as a debt relief of accounts payable. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a gain of $70,510 related to debt relief. The Company had other expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of $19,455 compared to $177,748 in 2008. As indicated above, the reduction resulted from a reduction in the amortization of discounts on convertible notes and value of detachable warrants and related debt conversion expenses. NET LOSS Our net loss for the Quarter Ended September 30 2009 decreased to $246,123 from net loss of $506,896 for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008, representing a decrease of 47%. The decrease is directly related to limited activity, due to a lack of funds and a significant decrease in expenses from the amortization of discounts on convertible notes and value of detachable warrants and for related debt conversion expenses. FINANCIAL CONDITION CASH AND WORKING CAPITAL

The increase to our working capital deficit was primarily attributable to an increase in accounts payable and an increase in provision for lawsuit settlements as discussed below. LIABILITIES

The increase in provision for lawsuits is due to accrued interest on outstanding judgments. Accounts payable increased due to a lack of funds to pay creditors. Short-term loans increased due to interest expense. 30 We continue to negotiate with our creditors for the payment of our accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Payment of these liabilities is contingent on receipt of new funding that would enable us to make payments to the creditors. Our ability to continue our operations may be conditional upon the forbearance of our creditors. Included in short-term loans at September 30, 2009 are unsecured, non-interest bearing advances of $138,600 that we anticipate will be converted into shares of our common stock. CASH FLOWS At September 30, ----------------------- 2009 2008 ---- ---- Net Cash provided by (used in) Operating Activities ($149,999) ($298,907) Net Cash provided by (used in) Financing Activities -- ($14,325) Net Cash provided by (used in) Financing Activities $150,000 $323,500 Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash During Period $1 $10,268 CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES The decrease in cash used in operating activities was due to the limited amount of funds available compared to 2008. 31 NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 2009, the FASB established the "FASB Accounting Standards Codification" (Codification) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification is effective for the Company this period ended September 30, 2009 and references to pre-codification statements have been removed or replaced in the Company's consolidated financial statements. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets," which has not been added to the Codification. It is an amendment of ASC Topics 310 (Receivables), 405 (Liabilities), 470 (Debt), 740 (Income Taxes) and 810 (Consolidation) as they pertain SFAS No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," and requires entities to provide more information about sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the seller retains some risk to the assets. This statement will improve the relevance, representation faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets. It will also take into account the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows, and a transferor's continuing involvement. SFAS No. 166 is effective for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. This statement is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010 and is expected to have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB interpretation No. 46(R)," which has not been added to the Codification. It establishes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or not controlled through voting should be consolidated. This statement improves financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities, which addresses the effects on certain provisions of ASC Topic 810 (Consolidation) as it pertains to FASB interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," as a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in FASB No. 166, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets," and constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of Interpretation 46(R). SFAS No. 167 is effective for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. This statement is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010 and is expected to have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In September 2009, the FASB published FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)." It amends Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures--Overall, to permit a reporting entity to measure the fair value of certain investments on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent). It also requires new disclosures, by major category of investments, about the attributes includes of investments within the scope of this amendment to the Codification. The provisions of ASU 2009-12 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2009-12 are not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 32 In October 2009, the FASB published FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, "Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) - Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements." It addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this guidance amends the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, "Revenue Recognition-Multiple-Element Arrangements," for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The provisions of ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2009-13 are not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In October 2009, the FASB published FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-14, "Software (Topic 985) - Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include Software Elements." It changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Under this guidance, tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product's essential functionality are excluded from the software revenue guidance in Subtopic 985-605, "Software-Revenue Recognition." In addition, hardware components of a tangible product containing software components are always excluded from the software revenue guidance. The provisions of ASU 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2009-14 are not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In October 2009, the FASB published FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-15, "Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing." It includes amendments to Topic 470, Debt, (Subtopic 470-20), and Topic 260, Earnings per Share (Subtopic 260-10), to provide guidance on share-lending arrangements entered into on an entity's own shares in contemplation of a convertible debt offering or other financing. The provisions of ASU 2009-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years FOR ARRANGEMENTS OUTSTANDING AS OF THE BEGINNING OF THOSE YEARS. Retrospective application is required for such arrangements. The provisions of ASU 2009-15 is effective FOR ARRANGEMENTS ENTERED INTO ON (NOT OUTSTANDING) or after the beginning of the first reporting period that begins on or after June 15, 2009. Certain transition disclosures are also required. Early application is not permitted. The provisions of ASU 2009-15 are not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 33 ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the Company's Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)).These controls are designed to ensure that material information the Company must disclose in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. These officers have concluded, based on that evaluation, that as of such date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level for a Company with substantially no activities and no personnel. The Company believes it must devise new procedures as it increases its activity and its personnel. MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act the Company's Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria described in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment management identified a material weaknesses in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting due in a significant part to the pervasive effect of the lack of resources, specifically the limited number of personnel involved in the financial reporting including the number of persons that are appropriately qualified in the areas of U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting. These limitations include an inability to segregate functions. Because of this weakness there is a possibility that a material misstatement of the annual financial statements would not have been prevented or detected. Nevertheless the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believed that for the limited operations of the Company internal controls over financial reporting were adequate to provide reasonable assurance of the accuracy of the Company's financial statements at year end. The adverse effect of the material weakness over internal controls, however, will become magnified if the Company increases operations. CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 34 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS NONE ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. NONE ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION The services of Jason Myers, the Company's Chairman of the Board and co Chief Executive Officer are provided pursuant to a Consulting Agreement with Aspatuck Holdings, Ltd. dated April 1, 2006 Under the Consulting Agreement. Aspatuck Holdings is to provide the services of Mr. Myers and receive annual fees of $120,000. As of September 30, 2009 there were $387,000 of unpaid fees. The Company has agreed to pay, as funds become available, $64,000 of the unpaid fees and then $10,000 per month until all amounts, are paid. On November 7, 2009 we received notification that the Peoples Republic of China granted two patents to Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. on July 22, 2009 for Charge Air Systems for Turbocharged Four-Cycle Internal Combustion Engines and Two Stage Charge Air System for Four-Cycle Internal Combustion Engine. The original applications for these patents were filed July 23, 1998. The People's Republic of China represents one of the fastest growing markets for our products. 35 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 36 In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Signature Title Date ----- ---- /s/ Jason Meyers Co-Chief Executive Officer, November 16, 2009 --------------------- Director Jason Meyers /s/ Debi Kokinos Chief Financial Officer November 16, 2009 --------------------- and Chief Accounting Officer Debi Kokinos 37

TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC 10-Q