UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

______________________________________________________________________

FORM 10-K

ý		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 033-84580

RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

______________________________________________________________________



Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		11-3233647 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

420 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10170

(Address of principal executive offices—Zip Code)

(212) 594-2700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

______________________________________________________________________

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý

As of March 229, ~~2016~~2017, no common units of limited partnership of the Registrant were held by non-affiliates of the Registrant. There is no established trading market for such units.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement of SL Green Realty Corp., the indirect parent of the Registrant, for its ~~2016~~2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Registrant's fiscal year are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
1.	Business	3
1A.	Risk Factors	5
1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	13
2	Properties	14
3	Legal Proceedings	19
4	Mine Safety Disclosures	19
PART II
5	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	20
6	Selected Financial Data	21
7	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	37
8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	38
9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	7377
9A.	Controls and Procedures	7377
9B.	Other Information	7377
PART III
10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	7478
11	Executive Compensation	7478
12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	7478
13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	7478
14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	7478
PART IV
15	Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules	7579

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P., or ROP, commenced operations on June 2, 1995. The sole general partner of ROP is Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC., or WAGP, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P., or the Operating Partnership. The sole limited partner of ROP is the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is 95.84% owned by SL Green Realty Corp., or SL Green, as of December 31, 2016. SL Green is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, and is the sole managing general partner of the Operating Partnership. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references to "we," "our," "us" and the "Company" means ROP and all entities owned or controlled by ROP.

ROP is engaged in the ~~business of owning~~acquisition, ~~managing~~ownership, ~~leasing,~~management ~~acquiring~~ and ~~repositioning~~operation of commercial and residential real estate properties, principally office properties, and also owns land for future development, located in New York City, Westchester County, Connecticut and New Jersey, which collectively is also known as the New York Metropolitan area.

SL Green Realty Corp., or SL Green, and the Operating Partnership were formed in June 1997. SL Green has qualified, and expects to qualify in the current fiscal year as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and operates as a self-administered, self-managed REIT. A REIT is a legal entity that holds real estate interests and, through payments of dividends to stockholders, is permitted to minimize the payment of Federal income taxes at the corporate level. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references to "we," "our," "us" and the "Company" means ROP and all entities owned or controlled by ROP.

On January 25, 2007, SL Green completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Reckson Associates Realty Corp., or RARC, the prior general partner of ROP. This transaction is referred to herein as the Merger.

In 2015, SL Green transferred two properties and SL Green's tenancy in common interest in a fee interest with a total value of $395.0 million to ROP. Additionally, in 2015, SL Green transferred one entity that held debt investments and financing receivables with an aggregate carrying value of $1.7 billion to ROP. During 2014, SL Green transferred five properties with a total value aggregating $884.3 million to ROP. These transfers were made to further diversify ROP's portfolio. Under the ~~Business~~business ~~Combinations~~combinations guidance (Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, 805-50), these transfers were determined to be transfers of businesses between the indirect parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. As such, the assets and liabilities of the properties were transferred at their carrying values and were recorded as of the beginning of the current reporting period as though the assets and liabilities had been transferred at that date. The consolidated financial statements and financial information presented for all prior years have been retrospectively adjusted to furnish comparative information.

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we owned the following interests in properties in the New York Metropolitan area, primarily in midtown Manhattan. Our investments in the New York Metropolitan area also include investments in Brooklyn, Westchester County, Connecticut and New Jersey, which are collectively known as the Suburban properties:

Location	Type	Number ofBuildings	Approximate Square Feet	Weighted Average Occupancy(1)
Commercial:
Manhattan	Office	16	8,463,245	9496.94	%
	Retail(2)(3)	5	352,892	97.6	%
	Fee Interest	2	197,654	100.0	%
		23	9,013,791	9596.15	%
Suburban	Office	1918	3,~~287~~251,~~800~~000	8083.02	%
	Retail	1	52,000	100.0	%
		20	3,339,800	80.3	%
		19	3,303,000	83.4	%
Total commercial properties		4342	12,~~353~~316,~~591~~791	9193.10	%
Residential:
Manhattan	Residential(2)	—	222,855	8993.51	%
Total portfolio		4342	12,~~576~~539,~~446~~646	9193.10	%

____________________________________________________________________

(1) The weighted average occupancy for commercial properties represents the total occupied square feet divided by total ~~available~~square ~~rentable~~footage ~~square~~at ~~feet~~acquisition. The weighted average occupancy for residential properties represents the total occupied units divided by total available units.

(2) As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we owned a building that was comprised of approximately 270,132 square feet of retail space and approximately 222,855 square feet of residential space. For the purpose of this report, we have included the building asin ~~part~~the number of retail properties we own. However, we have included only the retail square footage in the retail approximate square footage, and have ~~shown~~listed the balance of the square footage ~~under~~as ~~its~~residential ~~respective~~square ~~classifications~~footage.


(3)	Includes two unconsolidated joint venture retail properties at 131-137 Spring Street comprised of approximately 68,342 square feet.

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we also held debt, preferred equity and other investments with a book value of $12.80 billion, including $0.3 billion of debt and preferred equity investments and other financing receivables that are included in balance sheet line items other than the Debt and Preferred Equity Investments line item.

Our corporate offices are located in midtown Manhattan at 420 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10170. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, SL Green's corporate staff, inclusive of our staff, consisted of ~~296~~307 persons, including ~~187~~209 professionals

experienced in all aspects of commercial real estate. We can be contacted at (212) 594-2700. Our indirect parent entity, SL Green, maintains a website at www.slgreen.com. On this website, you can obtain, free of charge, a copy of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material electronically with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. SL Green has also made available on its website its audit committee charter, compensation committee charter, nominating and corporate governance committee charter, code of business conduct and ethics and corporate governance principles. We do not intend for information contained on SL Green's website to be part of this annual report on Form 10-K. You can also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 (1-800-SEC-0330). The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Business and Growth Strategies

See Item 1 "Business—Business and Growth Strategies" in SL Green and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for a complete description of SL Green's business and growth strategies.

Competition

See Item 1 "Business—Competition" in SL Green and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for a complete description of SL Green's competition.

Manhattan Office Market Overview

See Item 1 "Business—Manhattan Office Market Overview" in SL Green and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for a complete description of SL Green's Manhattan office market overview.

Industry Segments

See Item 1 "Business—Industry Segments" in SL Green and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for a complete description of SL Green's industry segments.

Employees

See Item 1 "Business—Employees" in SL Green and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for a complete description of SL Green's employees.

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

We encourage you to read "Item 1A—Risk Factors" in SL Green and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Declines in the demand for office space in New York City, and in particular midtown Manhattan, as well as our Suburban markets, including Westchester County, Connecticut, and New Jersey, could adversely affect the value of our real estate portfolio and our results of operations and, consequently, our ability to service ~~current~~debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green.

The majority of our property holdings are comprised of commercial office properties located in midtown Manhattan. Our property holdings also include a number of retail properties and a multifamily residential ~~property~~properties. As a result, our business is dependent on the condition of the New York City economy in general and the market for office space in midtown Manhattan in particular. Future weakness and uncertainty in the New York City economy could materially reduce the value of our real estate portfolio and our rental revenues, and thus adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service ~~current~~ debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green. Similarly, future weakness and uncertainty in our suburban markets could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service ~~current~~ debt obligations and to make distributions to SL Green.

We believe that job creation in the financial and professional services industries in New York City impacts our overall financial performance. Both new leasing activity and overall asking rents could be negatively impacted by declining rates of job creation in the current or future periods.

We may be unable to renew leases or relet space as leases expire.

If ~~our~~ tenants decide not to renew their leases upon ~~their~~ expiration, we may not be able to relet the space. Even if tenants do renew or we can relet the space, the terms of a renewal or new lease, taking into account among other things, the cost of improvements to the property and leasing commissions, may be less favorable than the terms in the expired leases. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, approximately 45.20 million square feet, representing approximately 3844.98% of the rentable square feet, are scheduled to expire by December 31, ~~2020~~2021 at our consolidated properties and as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, these leases had annualized escalated rent totaling $~~253~~302.04 million. We also have leases with termination options beyond ~~2020~~2021. In addition, changes in space utilization by ~~our~~ tenants may impact our ability to renew or relet space without the need to incur substantial costs in renovating or redesigning the internal configuration of the relevant property. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases or relet the space at similar rates or if we incur substantial costs in renewing or reletting the space, our cash flow and ability to service debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green could be adversely affected.

We face significant competition for tenants.

The leasing of real estate is highly competitive. The principal competitive factors are rent, location, services provided and the nature and condition of the property to be leased. We directly compete with all owners, developers and operators of similar space in the areas in which our properties are located.

Our commercial office properties are concentrated in highly developed areas of midtown Manhattan and certain Suburban central business districts, or CBDs. Manhattan is the largest office market in the United States. The number of competitive office properties in Manhattan and CBDs in which our Suburban properties are located, which may be newer or better located than our properties, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease office space at our properties, and on the effective rents we are able to charge.

The expiration of long term leases or operating sublease interests where we do not own a fee interest in the land could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our interests in 461 Fifth Avenue, 625 Madison Avenue, 1185 Avenue of the Americas, 919 Third Avenue, and 711 Third Avenue all in Manhattan, and 1055 Washington Boulevard, Stamford, Connecticut, are entirely or partially comprised of either long-term leasehold or operating sublease interests in the land and the improvements, rather than by ownership of fee interest in the land. We have the ability to acquire the fee position at 461 Fifth Avenue for a fixed price on a specific date. The fee interest in the land at 919 Third Avenue is owned by SL Green.

The average remaining term of these long-term leases as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, including our unilateral extension rights on each of the properties, is 3139 years. Pursuant to the leasehold arrangements, we, as ~~tenants~~tenant under the operating sublease, perform the functions traditionally performed by landlords with respect to our subtenants. We are responsible for not only collecting rent from our subtenants, but also maintaining the property and paying expenses relating to the property. Our share of annualized cash rents of the commercial office properties held through long-term leases or operating sublease interests at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 totaled $~~191~~206.2 million, or 3233.74%, of our share of total Portfolio annualized cash rent ~~for office properties~~. Unless we purchase a fee interest in the underlying land or extend the terms of these leases prior to ~~their~~ expiration, we will lose our right to operate these properties upon expiration of the leases, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Rent payments under leasehold or

Table of Contents

operating sublease interests are adjusted, within the parameters of the contractual arrangements, at certain intervals. Rent adjustments may result in higher rents that could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.

Adverse economic and geopolitical conditions in general and the commercial office markets in the New York Metropolitan area in particular could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and, consequently, our ability to service debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green.

Our business may be affected by volatility in the financial and credit markets and other market, economic, or ~~economic~~political challenges experienced by the U.S. economy or the real estate industry as a whole, including changes in law and policy accompanying the new administration and uncertainty in connection with any such changes. Future periods of economic weakness could result in reduced access to credit and/or wider credit spreads. Economic or political uncertainty, including concern about growth and the stability of the markets generally, may lead many lenders and institutional investors to reduce, and in some cases, cease to provide funding to borrowers, which could adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and the liquidity and financial condition of our tenants. Our business may also be adversely affected by local economic conditions, as substantially all of our revenues are derived from our properties located in the New York Metropolitan area, particularly in ~~Manhattan,~~New ~~Westchester County~~York, ~~Connecticut and~~ New Jersey and Connecticut. Because our portfolio consists primarily of commercial office buildings, located principally in midtown Manhattan, as compared to a more diversified real estate portfolio, if economic conditions deteriorate, then our results of operations, financial condition and ability to service ~~current~~ debt obligations and to make distributions to SL Green may be adversely affected. Specifically, our business may be affected by the following conditions:


•	significant job losses or declining rates of job creation which may decrease demand for our office space, causing market rental rates and property values to be negatively impacted;


•	our ability to borrow on terms and conditions that we find acceptable may be limited, which could reduce our ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reducing our returns from both our existing operations and our acquisition and development activities and increasing our future interest expense; and


•	reduced values of our properties, which may limit our ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices or to obtain debt financing secured by our properties and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans.

We rely on five large properties for a significant portion of our revenue.

Five of our properties, 1185 Avenue of the Americas, ~~810~~625 ~~Seventh~~Madison Avenue, 919 Third Avenue, ~~625~~750 ~~Madison~~Third Avenue, and ~~750~~810 ~~Third~~Seventh Avenue, accounted for 4847.56% of our ~~total~~Portfolio annualized cash rent ~~for office properties~~, and 1185 Avenue of the Americas alone accounted for 1514.48% of our total annualized cash rent for office properties as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Our revenue and cash available to service debt obligations and to make distributions to SL Green would be materially adversely affected if the ground lease for the 1185 Avenue of the Americas property were terminated for any reason or if any of these properties were materially damaged or destroyed. Additionally, our revenue and cash available to service debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green would be materially adversely affected if tenants at these properties fail to timely make rental payments due to adverse financial conditions or otherwise, default under their leases or file for bankruptcy or become insolvent.

Our revenue and cash available to service debt obligations and to make distributions to SL Green would be materially adversely affected if the ground lease for the 1185 Avenue of the Americas property were terminated for any reason or if any of these properties were materially damaged or destroyed. Additionally, our revenue and cash available to service debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green would be materially adversely affected if tenants at these properties fail to timely make rental payments due to adverse financial conditions or otherwise, default under their leases or file for bankruptcy or become insolvent.

Our results of operations rely on major tenants and insolvency or bankruptcy of these or other tenants could adversely affect our results of operations.

Giving effect to leases in effect as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for consolidated properties, as of that date, our five largest tenants, based on annualized cash rent, accounted for 15.89% of our share of ~~total~~Portfolio annualized cash rent for office properties, with three tenants, Ralph Lauren Corporation, Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP and News America Incorporated, accounting for 4.57%, 3.8% and 2.6% of our share of total annualized cash rent for office properties, respectively. Our business and results of operations would be adversely affected if any of our major tenants became insolvent, declared bankruptcy, or otherwise refused to pay rent in a timely fashion or at all. In addition, if ~~current~~business conditions in the industries in which our tenants are concentrated deteriorate, we may experience increases in past due accounts, defaults, lower occupancy and reduced effective rents across tenants in such industries, which could in turn have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Leasing office space to smaller and growth-oriented businesses could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

Some of the tenants in our properties are smaller, growth-oriented businesses that may not have the financial strength of larger corporate tenants. Smaller companies generally experience a higher rate of failure than larger businesses. Growth-oriented firms may also seek other office space as they develop. Leasing office space to these companies could create a higher risk of tenant defaults, turnover and bankruptcies, which could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations.

We may suffer adverse consequences if our revenues decline since our operating costs do not necessarily decline in proportion to our revenue.

We earn a significant portion of our income from renting our properties. Our operating costs, however, do not necessarily fluctuate in direct proportion to changes in our rental revenue. As a result, our costs will not necessarily decline even if our revenues do. In such event, we may be forced to borrow to cover our costs, we may incur losses or we may not have cash available to service our debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green.

Table of Contents

We may suffer adverse consequences if our revenues decline since our operating costs do not necessarily decline in proportion to our revenue.

We face risks associated with property acquisitions.

We may acquire interests in properties, individual properties and portfolios of properties, including large portfolios that could significantly increase our size and alter our capital structure. Our acquisition activities may be exposed to, and their success may be adversely affected by, the following risks:


•	we may be unable to meet required closing conditions;


•	we may be unable to finance acquisitions and developments of properties on favorable terms or at all;


•	we may be unable to lease our acquired properties on the same terms or to the same level of occupancy as our existing properties;


•	acquired properties may fail to perform as we expected;


•	we may expend funds on, and devote management time to, acquisition opportunities which we do not complete, which may include non-refundable deposits;


•	our estimates of the costs we incur in renovating, improving, developing or redeveloping acquired properties may be inaccurate;


•	we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for acquired properties; and


•	we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new acquisitions and developments, particularly acquisitions of portfolios of properties, into our existing operations, and therefore our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We may acquire properties subject to both known and unknown liabilities and without any recourse, or with only limited recourse to the seller. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us arising from our ownership of those properties, we might have to pay substantial sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our cash flow. Unknown liabilities with respect to properties acquired might include:


•	claims by tenants, vendors or other persons arising from dealing with the former owners of the properties;


•	liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business;


•	claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the former owners of the properties; and


•	liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination.

Competition for acquisitions may reduce the number of acquisition opportunities available to us and increase the costs of those acquisitions.

We may acquire properties when we are presented with attractive opportunities. We may face competition for acquisition opportunities from other investors, particularly those investors who are willing to incur more leverage, and this competition may adversely affect us by subjecting us to the following risks:


•	an inability to acquire a desired property because of competition from other well-capitalized real estate investors, including publicly traded and privately held REITs, private real estate funds, domestic and foreign financial institutions, life insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds, pension trusts, partnerships and individual investors; and


•	an increase in the purchase price for such acquisition property.

If we are unable to successfully acquire additional properties, our ability to grow our business could be adversely affected. In addition, increases in the cost of acquisition opportunities could adversely affect our results of operations.

We are subject to risks that affect the retail environment.

Approximately 35.64% of our ~~share~~Portfolio of total annualized cash rent is generated by retail properties, principally in Manhattan. As a result, we are subject to risks that affect the retail environment generally, including the level of consumer spending, consumer confidence and levels of tourism in Manhattan. These factors could adversely affect the financial condition of our retail tenants ~~and the willingness of retailers to lease space in our retail properties, which could in turn have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.~~

The occurrence of terrorist attacks may adversely affect the value of our properties and our ability to generate cash flow.

Table of Contents

~~economic~~and ~~activity could decline as a result of terrorist attacks or other acts of terrorism or war, or~~ the ~~perceived~~willingness ~~threat~~ of ~~such~~retailers ~~acts. Each~~to oflease ~~these impacts could in turn trigger a decrease in the demand for~~ space in ~~the~~our ~~New~~retail ~~York Metropolitan area~~properties, which could ~~increase vacancies~~ in ~~our~~turn ~~properties~~have ~~and~~an ~~force~~adverse useffect ~~to lease our properties~~ on ~~less favorable terms. Furthermore, we may also experience increased costs in relation to security equipment and personnel. As a result, the value of~~ our ~~properties~~business and ~~our~~ results of operations ~~could materially decline~~.

The occurrence of a terrorist attack may adversely affect the value of our properties and our ability to generate cash flow.

Our operations are primarily concentrated in the New York Metropolitan area. In the aftermath of a terrorist attack or other acts of terrorism or war, tenants in the New York Metropolitan area may choose to relocate their business to less populated, lower-profile areas of the United States that those tenants believe are not as likely to be targets of future terrorist activity. In addition, economic activity could decline as a result of terrorist attacks or other acts of terrorism or war, or the perceived threat of such acts. Each of these impacts could in turn trigger a decrease in the demand for space in the New York Metropolitan area, which could increase vacancies in our properties and force us to lease our properties on less favorable terms. Furthermore, we may also experience increased costs in relation to security equipment and personnel. As a result, the value of our properties and our results of operations could materially decline.

Potential losses may not be covered by insurance.

ROP is insured through a program administered by SL Green. SL Green maintains “all-risk” property and rental value coverage (including coverage regarding the perils of flood, earthquake and terrorism), ~~within~~excluding ~~three~~nuclear, ~~property~~biological, ~~insurance~~chemical, ~~portfolios~~ and ~~liability~~radiological ~~insurance.~~terrorism ~~This~~("NBCR")), ~~includes~~within ~~ROP~~three ~~assets. The first~~ property ~~portfolio~~insurance ~~maintains~~programs aand ~~blanket~~liability ~~limit of $950~~insurance.0 ~~million~~Management ~~per~~believes ~~occurrence, including terrorism, for~~ the ~~majority~~policy ofspecifications ~~the~~and ~~New~~insured ~~York~~limits ~~City~~are ~~properties~~appropriate ingiven ~~our~~the ~~portfolio,~~relative ~~which~~risk ~~expires on December 31, 2017. The second portfolio maintains a limit~~ of ~~$1.5 billion per occurrence~~loss, ~~including terrorism, for several New York City properties and~~ the ~~majority~~cost of the ~~Suburban properties and expires on December 31, 2017. Each policy includes $100.0 million of flood~~ coverage, ~~with~~and aindustry ~~lower sublimit for locations in high hazard flood zones~~practice. ASeparate ~~third blanket~~ property ~~policy covers most of SL Green's residential assets~~ and ~~maintains a limit of $380.1 million per occurrence, including terrorism, for our residential properties and expires January 31, 2018. SL Green maintains two~~ liability policies which cover all our properties and provide limits of $201.0 million per occurrence and in the aggregate per location. The liability policies expire on October 31, 2016 and January 31, 2017 and cover our commercial and residential assets, respectively. Additional coverage may be purchased on a stand-alone basis for certain assets.

SLOn ~~Green's~~January ~~wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary~~12, ~~Belmont Insurance Company~~2015, orthe ~~Belmont,~~Terrorism ~~acts~~Risk asInsurance aProgram ~~captive~~Reauthorization ~~insurance company~~ and asExtension ~~one~~Act of ~~the~~2007 ~~elements~~("TRIPRA") of(formerly ~~our~~the ~~overall~~Terrorism ~~insurance~~Risk ~~program.~~Insurance ~~Belmont~~Act) was ~~formed~~reauthorized inuntil anDecember ~~effort to~~31, ~~among~~2020 ~~other~~pursuant ~~reasons, stabilize~~ to ~~some~~the ~~extent~~Terrorism ~~the~~Insurance ~~impact~~Program onReauthorization usand ofExtension ~~fluctuations~~Act of ~~insurance market conditions~~2015. The ~~Belmont~~TRIPRA isextends ~~licensed~~the infederal ~~New York to write~~ Terrorism, ~~NBCR~~Insurance ~~(nuclear,~~Program ~~biological,~~that ~~chemical,~~requires ~~and~~insurance ~~radiological),~~companies ~~General~~to ~~Liability,~~offer ~~Environmental~~terrorism ~~Liability,~~coverage ~~Flood,~~ and ~~D&O~~provides ~~coverage.~~for Ascompensation ~~long~~for asinsured SLlosses ~~Green~~resulting ~~owns~~from ~~Belmont,~~acts SLof ~~Green~~certified ~~is responsible for its liquidity and capital resources~~terrorism, ~~and~~subject to the ~~accounts~~current ofprogram ~~Belmont~~trigger ~~are part~~ of ~~SL Green's consolidated financial statements~~$120.0 Ifmillion, wewhich ~~experience~~will aincrease ~~loss~~by ~~and~~$20.0 ~~Belmont~~million isper ~~required~~annum, tocommencing ~~pay~~December 31, a2015 ~~claim~~(Trigger). Coinsurance under ~~our~~TRIPRA ~~insurance~~is ~~policy~~16%, SLincreasing ~~Green~~1% ~~would~~per ~~ultimately~~annum, ~~record~~as ~~the loss to the extent~~ of ~~Belmont’s~~December 31, ~~required~~2015 ~~payment~~(Coinsurance). ~~Belmont~~There isare ~~not~~no ~~reinsured~~assurances byTRIPRA awill ~~third-party. Therefore, insurance coverage provided by Belmont should not~~ be ~~considered~~further ~~as the equivalent of third-party insurance, but rather as a modified form of self-insurance~~extended.

OnIn ~~January~~October 122006, ~~2015,~~SL ~~the~~Green ~~Terrorism~~formed ~~Risk~~a ~~Insurance~~wholly-owned ~~Program~~taxable ~~Reauthorization~~REIT ~~and~~subsidiary, ~~Extension~~Belmont ~~Act of 2007 (TRIPRA) (formerly the Terrorism Risk~~ Insurance ~~Act)~~Company, ~~was~~or ~~reauthorized through December 31~~Belmont, ~~2020 pursuant~~ to ~~the~~act ~~Terrorism~~as ~~Insurance~~a ~~Program~~captive ~~Reauthorization and Extension Act of 2015. TRIPRA extends the federal Terrorism Insurance Program that requires~~ insurance ~~companies~~company ~~to offer terrorism coverage~~ and ~~provides~~as ~~for~~one ~~compensation for insured losses resulting from acts~~ of ~~certified terrorism, subject to~~ the ~~current~~elements ~~program trigger~~ of ~~$100.0~~our ~~million,~~overall ~~which~~insurance ~~will increase by $20~~program.0 ~~million~~Belmont ~~per~~is ~~annum,~~a ~~commencing~~subsidiary ~~December~~of ~~31,~~SL ~~2015~~Green. ~~Our~~Belmont ~~debt~~was ~~instruments,~~formed ~~consisting~~in ofan ~~mortgage~~effort ~~loans secured by our properties (which are generally non-recourse)~~to, ~~mezzanine~~among ~~loans, ground leases, 2012 credit facility, senior unsecured notes and~~ other ~~corporate obligations~~reasons, ~~contain~~stabilize ~~customary covenants requiring us~~ to ~~maintain~~some ~~insurance.~~extent ~~Although~~the wefluctuations ~~believe~~of ~~that we currently maintain sufficient~~ insurance ~~coverage~~market toconditions. ~~satisfy~~Belmont ~~these obligations, there~~ is nolicensed ~~assurance that~~ in ~~the~~New ~~future~~York ~~we will be able~~ to ~~procure~~write ~~coverage~~Terrorism, atNBCR ~~a reasonable cost. In such instances~~(nuclear, there can be no assurance that the lenders or ground lessors under these instruments will not take the position that a total or partial exclusion from “all-risk” insurance coverage for losses due tobiological, ~~for example~~chemical, ~~terrorist acts is a breach of these debt~~ and ~~ground lease instruments allowing the lenders or ground lessors to declare an event of default and accelerate repayment of debt or recapture of ground lease positions. In addition~~radiological), ifGeneral ~~lenders require greater coverage that we are unable to obtain at commercially reasonable rates~~Liability, weEnvironmental ~~may~~Liability ~~incur substantially higher insurance premiums or our ability to finance our properties~~ and ~~expand~~D&O ~~our portfolio may be adversely impacted~~coverage.

~~Furthermore~~Our debt instruments, ~~with~~consisting ~~respect~~of tomortgage ~~certain~~loans ofsecured by our properties (which are generally non-recourse to us), ~~including~~mezzanine ~~properties~~loans, ~~held~~ground byleases, ~~joint~~our ~~ventures~~2012 credit facility, orsenior ~~subject~~unsecured tonotes ~~triple~~and ~~net~~other ~~leases~~corporate obligations, contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we currently maintain sufficient insurance coverage to satisfy these obligations, there is ~~obtained~~no byassurance athat ~~third-party~~in ~~and~~the future we dowill ~~not~~be ~~control~~able ~~the~~to procure coverage~~. While~~ weat ~~may~~a ~~have~~reasonable ~~agreements~~cost. ~~with~~In such ~~third~~instances, ~~parties~~there ~~requiring~~can ~~them~~be tono ~~maintain~~assurance ~~adequate~~that ~~coverage~~the ~~and~~lenders weor ~~monitor~~ground lessors under these ~~policies,~~instruments ~~such~~will ~~coverage~~not ~~ultimately~~take ~~may~~the ~~not~~position bethat ~~maintained~~a total or ~~adequately~~partial ~~cover~~exclusion ~~our~~from “all-risk” ofinsurance ~~loss.~~coverage ~~Additionally~~for losses due to, wefor ~~may~~example, ~~have~~terrorist ~~less~~acts ~~protection~~is ~~than~~a ~~with~~breach ~~respect~~of tothese debt and ground lease instruments allowing the ~~properties~~lenders ~~where~~or weground ~~obtain~~lessors ~~coverage~~to ~~directly~~declare an event of default and accelerate repayment of debt or recapture of ground lease positions. ~~Although~~In weaddition, ~~consider~~if ~~our~~lenders ~~insurance~~require greater coverage tothat bewe ~~appropriate,~~are inunable ~~the~~to ~~event~~obtain ofat acommercially ~~major~~reasonable ~~catastrophe~~rates, we may ~~not~~incur ~~have~~substantially ~~sufficient~~higher ~~coverage~~insurance premiums or our ability to ~~replace~~finance ~~certain~~our properties and expand our portfolio may be adversely impacted.

Furthermore, with respect to certain of our properties, including properties held by joint ventures, or subject to triple net leases, insurance coverage is obtained by a third-party and we do not control the coverage. While we may have agreements with such third parties to maintain adequate coverage and we monitor these policies, such coverage ultimately may not be maintained or adequately cover our risk of loss. We may have less protection than with respect to the properties where we obtain coverage directly. Although we consider our insurance coverage to be appropriate, in the event of a major catastrophe, we may not have sufficient coverage to replace certain properties.

We face possible risks associated with natural disasters and the physical effects of climate change.

We are subject to ~~the~~ risks associated with natural disasters and the physical effects of climate change, which can include storms, hurricanes and flooding, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations and business. To the extent climate change causes changes in weather patterns, our markets could experience increases in storm intensity and rising sea-levels. Over time, these conditions could result in declining demand for office space in our buildings or the inability of us to operate the buildings at all. Climate change may also have indirect effects on our business by increasing the cost of (or making unavailable) property insurance on terms we find acceptable, increasing the cost of energy at our properties and requiring us to expend funds

Table of Contents

~~expend funds~~ as we seek to repair and protect our properties against such risks. There can be no assurance that climate change will not have a material adverse effect on our properties, operations or business.

Debt financing, financial covenants, degree of leverage, and increases in interest rates could adversely affect our economic performance.

Scheduled debt payments could adversely affect our results of operations.

Cash flow could be insufficient to make distributions to SL Green and meet the payments of principal and interest required under our current mortgages, our 2012 credit facility, our senior unsecured notes, our debentures and indebtedness outstanding at our ~~unconsolidated~~ joint venture property. We, SL Green, and the Operating Partnership are all borrowers jointly and severally obligated under the 2012 credit facility.

The total principal amount of our outstanding consolidated indebtedness was $32.87 billion as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, consisting of a $1.92 billion ~~under~~unsecured ~~our~~bank ~~2012 credit facility, which is inclusive of our $933.0 million~~ term loan, $1799.19 ~~billion~~million under our senior unsecured notes, and $~~753~~684.46 million of non-recourse mortgages and loans payable on ~~one~~certain of our ~~consolidated~~ properties and ~~certain~~ debt and preferred equity investments. In addition, we could increase the amount of our outstanding consolidated indebtedness in the future, in part by borrowing under the revolving credit facility portion of our 2012 credit facility. The $1.6 billion revolving credit facility portion of our 2012 credit facility currently matures in March 2020, which includes two six-month extension options. In the first quarter of 2015, we modified and extended the revolving credit facility from March 2018 to March 2020 and reduced the margin by 25 basis points. This modification took effect in the first quarter of 2015. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the total principal amount of non-recourse indebtedness outstanding at our unconsolidated joint venture property was $141.0 million.

If we are unable to make payments under our 2012 credit facility, all amounts due and owing at such time shall accrue interest at a rate equal to 2.00% higher than the rate at which each draw was made. If we are unable to make payments under our senior unsecured notes, the principal and unpaid interest will become immediately payable. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the mortgagee could foreclose on the property, resulting in loss of income and asset value. Foreclosure on mortgaged properties or an inability to make payments under our 2012 credit facility or our senior unsecured notes could trigger defaults under the terms of our other financings, making such financings at risk of being declared immediately payable, and would have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to refinance existing indebtedness, which may require substantial principal payments at maturity. ~~In 2016, $253.4 million under the master repurchase agreement facility and $255.3 million of our senior unsecured notes will mature.~~ At the present time, we intend to repay, refinance, or exercise extension options, ~~repay~~on ~~or refinance~~ the debt associated with our properties on or prior to their respective maturity dates. At the time of refinancing, prevailing interest rates or other factors, such as the possible reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans may result in higher interest rates. Increased interest expense on the extended or refinanced debt would adversely affect cash flow and our ability to service debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green. If any principal payments due at maturity cannot be repaid, refinanced or extended, our cash flow will not be sufficient to repay maturing or accelerated debt.

Financial covenants could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

The mortgages on our properties generally contain customary negative covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the properties, to enter into material leases without lender consent or materially modify existing leases, among other things. In addition, our 2012 credit facility and senior unsecured notes contain restrictions and requirements on our method of operations. Our 2012 credit facility and our unsecured notes also require us to maintain designated ratios, including but not limited to, total debt-to-assets, debt service coverage and unencumbered assets-to-unsecured debt. These restrictions could adversely affect operations (including reducing our flexibility and our ability to incur additional debt), our ability to ~~service~~pay debt obligations and our ability ~~make~~ to make distributions to SL Green.

Rising interest rates could adversely affect our cash flow.

Advances under our 2012 credit facility and our master repurchase agreement facility bear interest at a variable rate. Our consolidated variable rate borrowings totaled $2567.26 ~~billion~~million at December 31, ~~2015~~2016. In addition, we could increase the amount of our outstanding variable rate debt in the future, in part by borrowing additional amounts under our 2012 credit facility, which consisted of a $1.6 billion revolving credit facility and a $~~933~~1.02 ~~million~~billion term loan. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility and term loan bore interest at the 30-day LIBOR, plus spreads of ~~125~~0.0125 basis points and ~~140~~0.014 basis points, respectively, at December 31, ~~2015~~2016. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, ~~borrowings~~the ~~under~~effective ~~our~~interest ~~2012~~rate ~~credit~~was ~~facility~~1.78% ~~bore~~for ~~weighted~~the ~~average~~revolving ~~interest~~credit atfacility and 1.5696% for the term loan facility. We may incur indebtedness in the future that also bears interest at a variable rate or may be required to refinance our debt at higher rates. At December 31, ~~2015~~2016, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates across each of our consolidated variable interest rate instruments would ~~increase~~decrease our annual interest costs, net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments, by approximately $107.01 million. Our joint ventures may also incur variable rate debt and face similar risks. Accordingly, increases in interest rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial conditions and our ability to continue to service debt and make distributions to SL Green.

Table of Contents

Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect results of operations.

The interest rate hedge instruments we use to manage some of our exposure to interest rate volatility involve risk and counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements. In addition, these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes and when existing interest rate hedges terminate, we may incur increased costs in putting in place further interest rate hedges. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations.

Increases in our level of indebtedness could adversely affect our cash flow.

SL Green considers its business as a whole in determining the amount of leverage of itself and its subsidiaries, including us. SL Green also considers other factors in making decisions regarding the incurrence of indebtedness, such as the purchase price of properties to be acquired with debt financing, the estimated market value of our properties upon refinancing and the ability of particular properties and our business as a whole to generate cash flow to cover expected debt service. Our organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount of indebtedness we may incur. As a result, if we become more highly leveraged, an increase in debt service could adversely affect cash available for distributions to SL Green and could increase the risk of default on our indebtedness.

A downgrade in our credit ratings could materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Our credit rating and the credit ratings assigned to our debt securities could change based upon, among other things, our results of operations and financial condition. These ratings are subject to ongoing evaluation by credit rating agencies, and any rating could be changed or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances warrant such action. Moreover, these credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold our securities. If any of the credit rating agencies that have rated our securities downgrades or lowers its credit rating, or if any credit rating agency indicates that it has placed any such rating on a “watch list” for a possible downgrading or lowering, or otherwise indicates that its outlook for that rating is negative, such action could have a material adverse effect on our costs and availability of funding, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, the trading price of our securities and our ability to ~~service~~satisfy our debt service obligations and make distributions to SL Green.

Debt and preferred equity investments could cause us to incur expenses, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We held first mortgages, mezzanine loans, junior participations and preferred equity interests in 4163 investments with an aggregate net book value of $12.70 billion including $0.3 billion of investments recorded in balance sheet line items other than the Debt and Preferred Equity Investments line item at December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Some of these instruments may be recourse ~~in whole or in part~~ to their sponsors, while others are limited to the collateral securing the loan. In the event of a default under these obligations, we may have to take possession of the collateral securing these interests. Borrowers may, among other things, contest enforcement of foreclosure or other remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against such enforcement and/or bring claims for lender liability in response to actions to enforce their obligations to us. Declines in the value of the property may prevent us from realizing an amount equal to our investment upon foreclosure or realization even if we make substantial improvements or repairs to the underlying real estate in order to maximize such property's investment potential. In addition, we may invest in mortgage-backed securities and other marketable securities.

We maintain and regularly evaluate the need for reserves to protect against potential future losses. Our reserves reflect management's judgment of the probability and severity of losses and the value of the underlying collateral. We cannot be certain that our judgment will prove to be correct and that our reserves will be adequate over time to protect against future losses because of unanticipated adverse changes in the economy or events adversely affecting specific properties, assets, tenants, borrowers, industries in which our tenants and borrowers operate or markets in which our tenants and borrowers or their properties are located. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we had no recorded reserves for possible credit losses. If our reserves for credit losses prove inadequate, we could suffer losses which would have a material adverse effect on our financial performance and our ability to service debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green.

Joint investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority and reliance upon a co-venturer's financial condition.

We co-invest with third parties through partnerships, joint ventures, co-tenancies or other structures, and by acquiring non-controlling interests in, or sharing responsibility for managing the affairs of, a property, partnership, joint venture, co-tenancy or other entity. Therefore, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding such property, partnership, joint venture or other entity. Investments in partnerships, joint ventures, or other entities may involve risks not present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that our partners, co-tenants or co-venturers might become bankrupt or otherwise fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Additionally, our partners or co-venturers might at any time have economic or other business interests or goals which are competitive or inconsistent with our business interests or goals. These investments ~~may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions such as a sale, because neither we, nor the partner, co-tenant or co-~~

Table of Contents

may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions such as a sale, because neither we, nor the partner, co-tenant or co-venturer would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. In addition, we may in specific circumstances be liable for the actions of our third-party partners, co-tenants or co-venturers. As of December 31, 2016, our unconsolidated joint ventures owned four properties and we had an aggregate cost basis in these joint ventures totaling $174.1 million. These include three acquisition, development and construction arrangements that are accounted under the equity method. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to us as of December 31, 2016.

Certain of our joint venture agreements contain terms in favor of our partners that could have an adverse effect on the value of our investments in the joint ventures.

Each of our joint venture agreements has been individually negotiated with our partner in the joint venture and, in some cases, we have agreed to terms that are more favorable to our partner in the joint venture than to us. For example, our partner may be entitled to a specified portion of the profits of the joint venture before we are entitled to any portion of such profits. We may also enter into similar arrangements in the future. These rights may permit our partner in a particular joint venture to obtain a greater benefit from the value or profits of the joint venture than us, which could have an adverse effect on the value of our investment in the joint venture and on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may incur costs to comply with environmental and health and safety laws.

We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental and health and safety laws which change from time to time. These laws regulate, among other things, air and water quality, our use, storage, disposal and management of hazardous substances and wastes and can impose liability on current and former property owners or operators for the clean-up of certain hazardous substances released on a property and any associated damage to natural resources without regard to whether the release was in compliance with law or whether it was caused by, or known to, the property owner or operator. The presence of hazardous substances on our properties may adversely affect occupancy and our ability to develop or sell or borrow against those properties. In addition to potential liability for clean-up costs, private plaintiffs may bring claims for personal injury, property damage or for similar reasons. Various laws also impose liability for the clean-up of contamination at any facility (e.g., a landfill) to which we have sent hazardous substances for treatment or disposal, without regard to whether the materials were transported, treated and disposed in accordance with law. Being held responsible for such a clean-up could result in significant cost to us and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may incur significant costs complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act and other regulatory and legal requirements.

Our properties may be subject to risks relating to current or future laws including laws benefiting disabled persons, and other state or local zoning, construction or other regulations. These laws may require significant property modifications in the future, which could result in fines being levied against us in the future. The occurrence of any of these events could have an adverse impact on our cash flows and ability to pay service debt and make distributions on to SL Green.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA, all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Additional federal, state and local laws also may require modifications to our properties, or restrict our ability to renovate our properties. We have not conducted an audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance with laws and regulations to which we are subject. If one or more of our properties is not in compliance with the material provisions of the ADA or other legislation, then we may be required to incur additional costs to bring the property into compliance with the ADA or state or local laws. We cannot predict the ultimate amount of the cost of compliance with ADA or other legislation. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA and any other legislation, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow and/or ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make distributions to SL Green could be adversely affected.

We face potential conflicts of interest.

Members of management may have a conflict of interest over whether to enforce terms of agreements with entities which Mr. Green, directly or indirectly, has an affiliation.

~~Through~~ Alliance Building Services, or Alliance, ~~First~~and ~~Quality~~its ~~Maintenance, L.P.,~~affiliates orare ~~First~~partially ~~Quality,~~owned ~~provides~~by ~~cleaning~~Gary Green, ~~extermination~~a ~~and~~son ~~related~~of ~~services,~~Stephen ~~Classic~~L. ~~Security LLC~~Green, ~~provides~~the ~~security~~chairman ~~services,~~of ~~Bright~~SL ~~Star~~Green's ~~Couriers LLC~~board ~~provides~~of ~~messenger services~~directors, and ~~Onyx~~provide ~~Restoration Works provides restoration~~ services ~~with respect~~ to certain properties owned by us. Alliance’s isaffiliates ~~partially~~include ~~owned~~First byQuality ~~Gary~~Maintenance, L.P., ~~Green~~or First Quality, aClassic ~~son~~Security LLC, ofBright ~~Stephen~~Star L.Couriers LLC ~~Green~~and Onyx Restoration Works, ~~the~~and ~~chairman~~provide ofcleaning, SLextermination, ~~Green's~~security, ~~board~~messenger, ofand ~~directors~~restoration services, respectively. In addition, First Quality has the non-exclusive opportunity to provide cleaning and related services to individual tenants at our properties on a basis separately negotiated with any tenant seeking such additional services. SLThe ~~Green,~~Service ~~including~~Corporation ~~us,~~has ~~and~~entered ~~our~~into ~~tenants~~an ~~accounted~~arrangement ~~for~~with ~~14.4% of~~ Alliance's ~~2015~~whereby ~~estimated~~it ~~total~~will ~~revenue.~~receive ~~While~~a weprofit ~~believe~~participation ~~that~~above ~~the~~a ~~contracts~~certain ~~pursuant~~threshold tofor ~~which these~~ services ~~are~~ provided ~~were~~by ~~the~~Alliance ~~result~~to ofcertain ~~arm's~~tenants ~~length~~at ~~negotiations,~~certain ~~there~~buildings ~~can~~above ~~be no assurance that~~ the ~~terms~~base ofservices ~~such~~specified ~~agreements,~~in ortheir ~~dealings~~lease ~~between the parties during the performance of such~~ agreements~~, will be as favorable to us as those which could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties providing comparable services under similar circumstances~~.

Our company and our tenants accounted for 24.8% of Alliance's 2016 estimated total revenue, based on information provided to us by Alliance. While we believe that the contracts pursuant to which these services are provided were the result of arm's length

Table of Contents

SLnegotiations, ~~Green's~~there ~~failure~~can tobe ~~qualify~~no asassurance athat ~~REIT~~the ~~would~~terms beof ~~costly~~such ~~and~~agreements, ~~would~~or ~~have~~dealings abetween ~~significant~~the ~~effect~~parties onduring the ~~value~~performance of SLsuch ~~Green's~~agreements, ~~securities~~will be as favorable to us as those which could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties providing comparable services under similar circumstances.

~~We believe that~~ SL Green has operated in a manner to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and SL Green intends to continue to so operate. Many of the REIT compliance requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. The determination that SL Green is a REIT requires an analysis of factual matters and circumstances. These matters, some of which are not totally within our or SL Green's ~~control,~~failure ~~can affect its qualification as a REIT. For example,~~ to qualify as a REIT, atwould ~~least~~be ~~95%~~costly of SL Green's gross income must come from designated sources that are listed in the REIT tax laws. SL Green is also required to distribute to stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income excluding capital gains. The fact that SL Green holds its assets through the Operating Partnership and ~~its~~would ~~subsidiaries~~have ~~further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even~~ a ~~technical~~significant oreffect ~~inadvertent~~on ~~mistake could jeopardize SL Green's REIT status. Furthermore, Congress and~~ the ~~Internal~~value ~~Revenue~~our ~~Service, or the IRS, might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for SL Green to remain qualified as a REIT~~securities.

IfWe believe that SL Green ~~fails~~has operated in a manner to qualify as a REIT, itfor ~~would~~federal ~~substantially~~income ~~reduce~~tax ~~the~~purposes ~~funds~~and ~~available~~SL ~~for~~Green intends ~~distribution~~to continue to ~~its~~so ~~stockholders~~operate. ~~because~~Many itof ~~would~~the REIT compliance requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. The determination that SL Green is a REIT requires an analysis of factual matters and circumstances. These matters, some of which are not betotally ~~allowed~~within our or SL Green’s control, can affect SL Green's qualification as a ~~deduction~~REIT. For ~~for~~example, ~~dividends~~to ~~paid~~qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of SL Green’s gross income must come from designated sources that are listed in the REIT tax laws. SL Green is also required to distribute to its stockholders inat ~~computing~~least 90% of its REIT taxable income ~~and~~excluding ~~would~~capital begains. ~~subject~~The tofact ~~federal~~that ~~income~~SL ~~tax~~Green atholds ~~regular~~its ~~corporate~~assets ~~rates~~through the Operating Partnership and itits subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could bejeopardize ~~subject~~SL toGreen’s REIT status. Furthermore, Congress and the ~~federal~~Internal ~~alternative~~Revenue ~~minimum~~Service, or the IRS, might make changes to the tax laws and ~~possibly~~regulations ~~increased~~that ~~state~~make ~~and~~it ~~local~~more ~~taxes.~~difficult, or impossible, for SL Green to remain qualified as a REIT.

~~Also,~~If ~~unless the IRS grants~~ SL Green ~~relief~~fails ~~under~~to ~~specific~~qualify ~~statutory provisions, it would remain disqualified~~ as a REIT, ~~for~~the ~~four~~funds ~~years~~available ~~following~~for ~~the~~distribution ~~year~~to itits ~~first~~stockholders ~~failed~~would tobe ~~qualify.~~substantially Ifreduced SLas ~~Green~~it ~~failed~~would tonot ~~qualify~~be asallowed a ~~REIT,~~deduction itfor ~~would~~dividends ~~have~~paid to ~~pay~~its ~~significant~~stockholders ~~income~~in ~~taxes~~computing ~~and~~its ~~ROP~~taxable ~~would~~income ~~therefore~~and ~~have~~would ~~less~~be ~~money~~subject ~~available~~to ~~for~~federal ~~investments,~~income totax ~~service~~at ~~debt~~regular ~~obligations~~corporate orrates ~~make~~and ~~distributions~~it tocould SLbe ~~Green.~~subject ~~This~~to ~~would~~the ~~likely~~federal ~~have~~alternative aminimum ~~significant~~tax ~~adverse~~and ~~effect~~possibly onincreased ~~the~~state ~~value~~and oflocal SLtaxes. Also, ~~Green's~~unless ~~securities.~~the AsIRS agrants ~~result~~it ofrelief ~~all~~under ~~these~~specific ~~factors~~statutory provisions, if SL Green ~~fails~~would toremain ~~qualify~~disqualified as a REIT, ~~this~~for ~~could~~four ~~impair~~years ~~our~~following ~~ability~~the toyear ~~expand~~in ~~our~~which ~~business~~it ~~and~~first ~~raise~~failed ~~capital~~to qualify.

If SL Green failed to qualify as a REIT, SL Green would ~~incur~~have to pay significant income taxes and ROP would therefore have less money available for investments or to service its debt obligations. This would likely have a significant adverse ~~tax~~effect ~~consequences~~on the value of our securities. As a result of all these factors, if ~~RARC~~SL ~~failed~~Green fails to qualify as a REIT, this could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital.

SLWe ~~Green~~may ~~has assumed that RARC has historically qualified as a REIT for United States federal income tax purposes and that SL Green would continue to~~ be ~~able~~subject to ~~qualify~~adverse aslegislative aor ~~REIT~~regulatory ~~following the Merger. However, if RARC failed to qualify as a REIT, SL Green generally would have succeeded to significant~~ tax ~~liabilities including the significant tax liability that would result from a deemed sale of assets by RARC pursuant to the Merger.~~changes

~~Loss~~The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are continually under review by Congress, the IRS, and the U.S. Department of ~~our~~the ~~key~~Treasury. ~~personnel~~Any such changes could ~~harm~~have an adverse effect on an investment in our ~~operations~~shares or on the market value or the resale potential of our assets.

We are dependent on ~~the~~external ~~efforts~~sources of ~~Marc Holliday, the chief executive officer of SL Green and president of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, or WAGP, the sole general partner of ROP, and Andrew W~~capital. Mathias, the president of SL Green. These officers have employment agreements which expire in January 2019 and December 2016, respectively. A loss of the services of either of these individuals could adversely affect our operations.

We need a substantial amount of capital to operate and grow our business. This need is exacerbated by the distribution requirements imposed on our parent company SL Green for it to qualify as a REIT. We therefore rely on third-party sources of capital, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of things, including the market's perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings. In addition, we anticipate raising money in the public debt markets with some regularity and our ability to do so will depend upon the general conditions prevailing in these markets. At any time conditions may exist that effectively prevent us, or that prevent REITs in general, from accessing these markets. Moreover, additional debt financing may substantially increase our leverage.

Loss of our key personnel could harm our operations and our stock price.

We are dependent on the efforts of Marc Holliday, the chief executive officer of SL Green and president of Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC, or WAGP, the sole general partner of ROP, and Andrew W. Mathias, the president of SL Green. These officers have employment agreements which expire in January 2019 and December 2017, respectively. A loss of the services of either of these individuals could adversely affect our operations.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of system failures or cyber security attacks.

Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our internal information technology systems, our systems are vulnerable to a number of risks including energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication failures and cyber attacks and intrusions, such as computer viruses, malware, attachments to e-mails, intrusion and unauthorized access, including from persons inside our organization or from persons outside our organization with access to our systems. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attacks and intrusions, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and instructions from around the world have increased. Our systems are critical to the operation of our business and any system failure, accident or security breach that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions. Although we make efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our systems and have implemented various measures to manage the risk of a security breach or disruption, there can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted security breaches or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. Any compromise of our security could also result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, loss or misuse of the information (which may be confidential, proprietary and/or commercially sensitive in nature) and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business.

Our property taxes could increase due to reassessment or property tax rate changes.

We are required to pay real property taxes in respect of our properties and such taxes may increase as our properties are reassessed by taxing authorities or as property tax rates change. An increase in the assessed value of our properties or our property tax rates could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations and our ability to service debt obligations and make distributions to SL Green.

Table of Contents

~~Compliance~~security ~~with~~breaches ~~changing~~or disruptions would not be successful or ~~new~~damaging. ~~regulations~~Any compromise of our security could also result in a violation of applicable toprivacy ~~corporate~~and ~~governance~~other laws, significant legal and ~~public~~financial ~~disclosure~~exposure, damage to our reputation, loss or misuse of the information (which may ~~result~~be confidential, proprietary and/or commercially sensitive in ~~additional~~nature) ~~expenses,~~and ~~affect~~a loss of confidence in our ~~operations~~security ~~and~~measures, ~~affect~~which could harm our ~~reputation~~business.

~~Changing~~Our orproperty ~~new~~taxes ~~laws,~~could ~~regulations~~increase and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including SEC regulations and the New York Stock Exchange rules, can create uncertainty for public companies. These changed or new laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to ~~their~~reassessment lack of specificity. As a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. If our efforts to comply with new or ~~changed~~property ~~laws,~~tax ~~regulations~~rate ~~and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation may be harmed~~changes.

Compliance with changing or new regulations applicable to corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses, affect our operations.

Changing or new laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including SEC regulations and NYSE rules, can create uncertainty for public companies. These changed or new laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity. As a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. If our efforts to comply with new or changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation may be harmed.

Our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In particular, our continued efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related regulations regarding our required assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting and our external auditors' audit of that assessment have required the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. We expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of significant resources. Further, our directors, president and treasurer could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified directors and executive officers, which could harm our business.

Forward-looking statements may prove inaccurate.

See Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Forward-looking Information," for additional disclosure regarding forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we did not have any unresolved comments with the staff of the SEC.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our Portfolio

General

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we owned or held interests in 16 commercial office buildings encompassing approximately 8.5 million rentable square feet, located primarily in midtown Manhattan. Many of these buildings include some amount of retail space on the lower floors, as well as basement/storage space. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, our portfolio also included ownership interests in 1918 commercial office buildings encompassing approximately 3.3 million rentable square feet located in Brooklyn, Westchester County, Connecticut and New Jersey. We refer to these buildings as our Suburban properties. Some of these buildings also include a small amount of retail space on the lower floors, as well as basement/storage space.

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we also owned in Manhattan, a mixed-use residential and prime retail property encompassing approximately 492,987 square feet and a land interest encompassing approximately 197,654 square feet. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we also held debt, preferred equity, and other investments with a book value of $12.80 billion, including $0.3 billion of debt and preferred equity investments and other financing receivables that are included in balance sheet line items other than the Debt and Preferred Equity Investments line item.

The following tables set forth certain information with respect to each of the Manhattan and Suburban office, prime retail, and residential, ~~redevelopment~~ properties and land interest in the portfolio as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016:

	Year Built/Renovated	SubMarket	ApproximateRentableSquare Feet	~~Percentage~~Percent of Portfolio Rentable Square Feet		Percent Occupied (1)	~~Percent Occupied (1)~~	AnnualizedCashRent (2)		~~AnnualizedCashRent (2)~~		Percentof PortfolioAnnualizedCashRent	~~Percentageof PortfolioAnnualizedCashRent~~NumberofTenants		AnnualizedCash Rent PerLeasedSquareFoot (3)	~~NumberofTenants~~	~~AnnualizedCash Rent PerLeasedSquareFoot (3)~~
MANHATTAN OFFICE PROPERTIES
"Same Store"
110 East 42nd Street	1921	Grand Central	215,400	2%	%	92.0%	~~98.5~~	%10,024,277		$	~~10,559,503~~	2%	124	%	$	2253.92	$	~~52.51~~
1185 Avenue of the Americas(4)	1969	Rockefeller Center	1,062,000	9		99.0	~~99.0~~	%91,540,901		~~89,890,619~~		15	1715		85.03	18	$	~~83.49~~
125 Park Avenue	1923/2006	Grand Central	604,245	5		99.9	~~97.8~~	%40,541,210		~~38,574,880~~		7	625		63.87	23	$	~~63.51~~
1350 Avenue of the Americas	1966	Rockefeller Center	562,000	5		87.9	~~99.6~~	%39,528,575		~~42,216,253~~		6	734		76.19	35	$	~~72.63~~
304 Park Avenue South	1930	Midtown South	215,000	2		100.0	~~75.7~~	%15,090,848		~~12,300,464~~		2	212		70.99	12	$	~~64.19~~
461 Fifth Avenue(4)	1988	Midtown	200,000	2		99.9	~~99.9~~	%18,655,416		~~18,067,162~~		3	311		89.91	12	$	~~86.86~~
555 West 57th Street	1971	Midtown West	941,000	8		99.9	~~99.9~~	%40,627,045		~~39,144,741~~		7	69		40.28	9	$	~~38.54~~
609 Fifth Avenue	1925/1990	Rockefeller Center	160,000	1		76.6	~~76.1~~	%15,376,177		~~14,707,066~~		2	213		123.17	13	$	~~118.52~~
625 Madison Avenue(4)(5)	1956/2002	Plaza District	563,000	5			97.2	%		56,748,599			10			22	$	100.53
625 Madison Avenue(4)	1956/2002	Plaza District	563,000	5		98.8		59,212,718				10	25		102.95
641 Sixth Avenue	1902	Midtown South	163,000	1			100.0	%		11,569,787			2			7	$	69.06
635 Sixth Avenue	1902	Midtown South	104,000	1		100.0		8,979,247				2	2		95.22
711 Third Avenue(5)	1955	Grand Central North	524,000	4			65.8	%		21,547,671			4			16	$	59.03
641 Sixth Avenue	1902	Midtown South	163,000	1		100.0		13,670,136				2	7		80.60
750 Third Avenue	1958/2006	Grand Central North	780,000	7			97.5	%		45,030,155			8			32	$	57.50
711 Third Avenue	1955	Grand Central North	524,000	4		92.2		32,258,214				5	18		59.32
810 Seventh Avenue	1970	Times Square	692,000	6			93.0	%		43,982,745			8			46	$	63.56
750 Third Avenue	1958/2006	Grand Central North	780,000	7		99.0		47,784,221				8	33		60.21
919 Third Avenue(6)	1970	Grand Central North	1,454,000	12			100.0	%		93,614,502			8			11	$	66.50
810 Seventh Avenue	1970	Times Square	692,000	6		93.6		44,995,971				7	47		65.72
Subtotal/ Weighted Average			8,135,645	69	%		95.3	%		$	537,954,147		84	%		278
919 Third Avenue(5)	1970	Grand Central North	1,454,000	12		100.0		97,465,047				8	8		65.16
"Non Same Store"
Subtotal/ Weighted Average			8,239,645	70%		97.1%		$	575,750,003			85%	283
110 Green Street(5)	1908/1920	Soho	223,600	2			78.1	%		$	9,251,909		1			63	$	69.74
"Non Same Store"
635 Sixth Avenue	1902	Midtown South	104,000	1			100.0	%		8,617,385			2			2	$	91.38
110 Green Street	1908/1920	Soho	223,600	2%		69.3%		9,681,581				1%	58		$	76.70
Subtotal/ Weighted Average			~~327~~223,600	32%	%	69.3%	~~85.0~~	%$	9,681,581	$	~~17,869,294~~	86%	358	%		65
Total / Weighted Average Manhattan Office Properties			8,463,245	72%	%	94.9%	~~94.9~~	%$	585,431,584	$	~~555,823,441~~	86%	87341	%		~~343~~
SUBURBAN OFFICE PROPERTIES
100 Summit Lake Drive	1988	Valhalla, Westchester	250,000	2	%		47.1	%		$	3,012,094		1	%		10	$	26.46
1100 King Street	1983-1986	Rye Brook, Westchester	540,000	5%		70.4%		$	9,976,658			2%	31		$	26.62
1100 King Street - 1-6 International Drive	1983-1986	Rye Brook, Westchester	540,000	5			61.7	%		8,669,686			1			27	$	26.44
520 White Plains Road	1979	Tarrytown, Westchester	180,000	2		96.1		4,355,388				1	13		27.29
115-117 Stevens Avenue	1984	Valhalla, Westchester	178,000	2		49.5		1,611,104				—	10		23.48

Table of Contents

	Year Built/Renovated	SubMarket	ApproximateRentableSquare Feet	~~Percentage~~Percent of Portfolio Rentable Square Feet		Percent Occupied (1)	~~Percent Occupied (1)~~	AnnualizedCashRent (2)		~~AnnualizedCashRent (2)~~		Percentof PortfolioAnnualizedCashRent	~~Percentageof PortfolioAnnualizedCashRent~~NumberofTenants		AnnualizedCash Rent PerLeasedSquareFoot (3)	~~NumberofTenants~~	~~AnnualizedCash Rent PerLeasedSquareFoot (3)~~
115-117 Stevens Avenue	1984	Valhalla, Westchester	178,000	1			77.2	%		2,931,132			—			11	$	22.47
100 Summit Lake Drive	1988	Valhalla, Westchester	250,000	2		66.0		4,248,251				1	11		26.37
200 Summit Lake Drive	1990	Valhalla, Westchester	245,000	2		95.8	~~82.7~~	%5,885,344		~~4,963,945~~		1	19		25.82	8	$	~~25.37~~
360 Hamilton Avenue	2000	White Plains, Westchester	384,000	4			94.7	%		13,570,212			2			21	$	37.01
500 Summit Lake Drive	1986	Valhalla, Westchester	228,000	2		97.8		5,373,160				1	7		27.22
500 Summit Lake Drive	1986	Valhalla, Westchester	228,000	2			97.8	%		5,141,442			1			7	$	26.05
360 Hamilton Avenue	2000	White Plains, Westchester	384,000	3		98.4		14,466,326				2	21		37.97
520 White Plains Road	1979	Tarrytown, Westchester	180,000	1			98.3	%		4,379,296			1			13	$	26.73
Westchester, NY Subtotal/Weighted Average			2,005,000	17%		81.9%		$	45,916,231			8%	102
Westchester, NY Subtotal/Weighted Average			2,005,000	17	%		77.5	%		$	42,667,807		7	%		97
680 Washington Boulevard (5)	1989	Stamford, Connecticut	133,000	1		87.0		5,224,048				—	9		45.69
1010 Washington Boulevard	1988	Stamford, Connecticut	143,400	1	%		75.3	%		$	3,505,394		1	%		21	$	31.35
750 Washington Boulevard (5)	1989	Stamford, Connecticut	192,000	2		95.0		7,867,284				1	9		43.15
1055 Washington Boulevard(4)	1987	Stamford, Connecticut	182,000	2			74.7	%		4,953,522			1			23	$	35.40
1055 Washington Boulevard	1987	Stamford, Connecticut	182,000	2		66.5		4,555,476				1	19		36.27
680 Washington(6)	1989	Stamford, Connecticut	133,000	1			88.9	%		5,242,567			—			10	$	44.83
1010 Washington Boulevard	1988	Stamford, Connecticut	143,400	1		91.3		4,324,770				1	27		34.73
7 Landmark Square	1973-1984	Stamford, Connecticut	36,800	—			100.0	%		728,423			1			2	$	56.55
Connecticut Subtotal/Weighted Average			650,400	6%		85.4%		$	21,971,578			3%	64
750 Washington Boulevard(6)	1989	Stamford, Connecticut	192,000	2			99.1	%		8,067,197			—			11	$	42.38
125 Chubb Way	2008	Lyndhurst, New Jersey	278,000	2%		73.3%		$	4,734,427			1%	7		$	24.40
Connecticut Subtotal/Weighted Average			687,200	6	%		85.8	%		$	22,497,103		3	%		67
New Jersey Subtotal/Weighted Average			278,000	2%		73.3%		$	4,734,427			1%	7
125 Chubb Way	2008	Lyndhurst, New Jersey	278,000	2	%		66.2	%		$	4,289,420		1	%		6	$	24.44
16 Court Street	1927-1928	Brooklyn, New York	317,600	3%		95.2%		$	13,042,385			2%	67		$	42.86
New Jersey Subtotal/Weighted Average			278,000	2	%		66.2	%		$	4,289,420		1	%		6
Brooklyn Subtotal/Weighted Average			317,600	3%		95.2%		$	13,042,385			2%	67
16 Court Street	1927-1928	Brooklyn, New York	317,600	3	%		95.5	%		$	12,136,463		2	%		69	$	41.04
Total / Weighted Average Suburban Office Properties			3,251,000	28%		83.2%		$	85,664,621			14%	240
Brooklyn Subtotal/Weighted Average			317,600	3	%		95.5	%		$	12,136,463		2	%		69
Portfolio Grand Total / Weighted Average			11,714,245	100%		92.7%		$	671,096,205			100%	581
Total / Weighted Average Suburban Office Properties			3,287,800	28	%		80.0	%		$	81,590,793		13	%		239
Portfolio Grand Total—ROP share of Annualized Cash Rent								$	616,688,773
Portfolio Grand Total / Weighted Average			11,751,045	100	%		90.7	%		$	637,414,234		100	%		582
PRIME RETAIL
Portfolio Grand Total—ROP share of Annualized Cash Rent										$	584,105,156
102 Greene Street	1910	SoHo	9,200	2%		54.3%		$	600,000			2%	1		$	152.79
PRIME RETAIL
115 Spring Street	1900	SoHo	5,218	1		100.0		2,800,000				8	1		536.60
102 Greene Street	1910	SoHo	9,200	3	%		54.3	%		$	457,411		2	%		1	$	121.14
131-137 Spring Street - 20.0%	1891	SoHo	68,342	16		93.9		12,041,005				7	9		187.84
115 Spring Street	1900	SoHo	5,218	1			100.0	%		2,800,000			13			1	$	536.60
315 West 33rd Street - The Olivia	2000	Penn Station	270,132	64		100.0		14,903,527				41	10		55.17
131-137 Spring Street - 20.0%	1891	SoHo	68,342	17			93.9	%		11,520,129			10			9	$	179.72
752 Madison Avenue	1996/2012	Plaza District	21,124	5		100.0		13,597,351				37	1		643.49
315 West 33rd Street - The Olivia	2000	Penn Station	270,132	66			100.0	%		14,878,400			67			10	$	54.47
Williamsburg Terrace	2010	Brooklyn, New York	52,000	12		100.0		1,791,476				5	3		34.43
Williamsburg Terrace(5)	2010	Brooklyn, New York	52,000	13			100.0	%		1,761,576			8			3	$	33.86
Total/Weighted Average Retail Properties			426,016	100%		98.0%		$	45,733,359			100%	25
Total/Weighted Average Retail Properties			404,892	100	%		97.9	%		$	31,417,516		100	%		24
LAND
LAND
635 Madison Avenue		Plaza District	176,530	100%		100.0%		3,677,574				100%
635 Madison Avenue		Plaza District	176,530	89	%		100.0	%		$	3,677,574		45	%
Total/Weighted Average Land Properties			176,530	100%		100.0%		$	3,677,574			100%
752 Madison Avenue(7)		Plaza District	21,124	11			100.0	%		4,412,024			55
Total/Weighted Average Land Properties			197,654	100	%		100.0	%		$	8,089,598		100	%

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY

SubMarket

Usable Sq. Feet

Total Units

~~PercentLeased~~PercentOccupied(1)

Annualized CashRent(12)

AverageMonthly RentPer Unit (6)

315 West 33rd Street - The Olivia

Penn Station

222,855

333

8993.51

1415,~~040~~319,~~156~~536

34,~~939~~131

____________________________________________________________________

(1) Excludes leases signed but not yet commenced as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

(2) Annualized Cash Rent represents the monthly contractual rent under existing leases as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 multiplied by 12. This amount reflects total rent before any rent abatements and includes expense reimbursements, which may be estimated as of such date. Total rent abatements for leases in effect as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for the 12 months ending December 31, 2016 will reduce cash rent by $59.79 million for our properties.


(3)	Annualized Cash Rent Per Leased Square Foot represents Annualized Cash Rent, as described in footnote (1) above, presented on a per leased square foot basis.


(4)	We hold a leasehold interest in this property.

(5) ~~Properties~~We ~~that~~own ~~were~~a ~~transferred~~51% interest in ~~2015~~this joint venture asset.

(6) WeCalculated ~~own~~based aon ~~51%~~occupied ~~interest in this joint venture asset~~units.

(7) We own a tenancy in common interest in the property.

Table of Contents

Historical Occupancy

Historically SL Green has achieved consistently higher occupancy rates in ~~our~~its Manhattan portfolio as compared to the overall midtown markets, as shown over the last five years in the following table:

	Percent ofManhattanPortfolioOccupied(1)		Occupancy Rate ofClass AOffice Propertiesin the midtownMarkets(2)(3)		Occupancy Rate ofClass BOffice Propertiesin the midtownMarkets(2)(3)
	LeasedOccupancy Rate ofManhattan OperatingPortfolio(1)		Occupancy Rate ofClass AOffice Propertiesin the midtownMarkets(2)(3)		Occupancy Rate ofClass BOffice Propertiesin the midtownMarkets(2)(3)
December 31, 2016	94.9	%	90.0	%	92.2	%
December 31, 2015	94.2	%	90.9	%	91.3	%
December 31, 2014	95.3	%	89.4	%	91.6	%
December 31, 2013	94.3	%	88.3	%	89.1	%
December 31, 2012	94.3	%	89.1	%	90.0	%
December 31, 2011	92.5	%	89.7	%	91.3	%

____________________________________________________________________

(1) Includes ~~space~~leases ~~for~~signed ~~leases~~but ~~that~~not ~~were~~yet ~~executed~~commenced as of the relevant date in the wholly-owned and joint venture properties ~~in Manhattan~~ owned by SL Green ~~as of that date~~.


(2)	Includes vacant space available for direct lease and sublease. Source: Cushman & Wakefield.

(3)

The term "Class B" is generally used in the Manhattan office market to describe office properties that are more than 25 years old but that are in good physical condition, enjoy widespread acceptance by high-quality tenants and are situated in desirable locations in Manhattan. Class B office properties can be distinguished from Class A properties in that Class A properties are generally newer properties with higher finishes and frequently obtain the highest rental rates within their markets.

Historically SL Green has achieved consistently higher occupancy rates in its Westchester County and Connecticut portfolios in comparison to the overall Westchester County and Stamford, Connecticut, CBD markets, as shown over the last five years in the following table:

	Percent ofWestchesterPortfolioOccupied(1)		Occupancy Rate ofClass AOffice Propertiesin the WestchesterMarket(2)		Percent ofConnecticutPortfolioOccupied(1)		Occupancy Rate ofClass AOffice Propertiesin the Stamford CBDMarket(2)
	LeasedOccupancy Rate ofWestchester OperatingPortfolio(1)		Occupancy Rate ofClass AOffice Propertiesin the WestchesterMarket(2)		LeasedOccupancy Rate ofConnecticut OperatingPortfolio(1)		Occupancy Rate ofClass AOffice Propertiesin the Stamford CBDMarket(2)
December 31, 2016	81.9	%	75.1	%	87.5	%	73.7	%
December 31, 2015	77.5	%	76.0	%	84.1	%	79.9	%
December 31, 2014	78.8	%	76.6	%	83.6	%	75.7	%
December 31, 2013	78.1	%	79.4	%	80.5	%	74.7	%
December 31, 2012	79.2	%	78.5	%	80.7	%	73.7	%
December 31, 2011	80.6	%	80.1	%	80.3	%	73.8	%

____________________________________________________________________


(1)	Includes leases signed but not yet commenced as of the relevant date in the wholly-owned and joint venture properties owned by SL Green.


(2)	Includes vacant space available for direct lease and sublease. Source: Cushman & Wakefield.

Lease Expirations

Leases in our Manhattan portfolio, as at many other Manhattan office properties, typically have an initial term of seven to fifteen years, compared to typical lease terms of five to ten years in other large U.S. office markets. For the five years ending December 31, ~~2020~~2021, the average annual ~~rollover~~lease expirations at our Manhattan operating properties is expected to be approximately 0.67 million square feet representing an average annual expiration rate of approximately 68.94% per year (assuming no tenants exercise renewal or cancellation options and there are no tenant bankruptcies or other tenant defaults).

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a schedule of the annual lease expirations at our Manhattan operating properties, with respect to leases in place as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for each of the next ten years and thereafter (assuming that no tenants exercise renewal or cancellation options and that there no tenant bankruptcies or other tenant defaults):

Manhattan Operating PropertiesYear of Lease Expiration	NumberofExpiringLeases(1)	SquareFootageofExpiringLeases	PercentageofTotalLeasedSquareFeet		AnnualizedCashRent ofExpiringLeases(2)		~~AnnualizedCashRent~~Percentage ~~PerLeasedSquareFoot~~of ~~ofExpiringLeases(3)~~Annualized Cash Rent of Expiring Leases		AnnualizedCashRent PerLeasedSquareFoot ofExpiringLeases(3)
2016(4)	62	598,353	7.3	%	$	40,752,104	$	68.11
2017(4)	48	324,332	3.8	%	$	19,774,278	3.4	%	$	60.97
2017	44	381,674	4.6		25,785,601		$	67.56
2018	35	385,164	4.6		35,830,315		6.1		93.03
2018	33	427,087	5.2		38,730,201		$	90.68
2019	34	793,517	9.4		58,639,593		10.0		73.90
2019	27	731,611	8.9		50,719,033		$	69.33
2020	36	820,892	9.7		59,607,453		10.2		72.61
2020	38	783,191	9.5		56,801,533		$	72.53
2021	46	1,259,426	14.9		83,706,966		14.3		66.46
2021	28	1,175,302	14.3		72,732,140		$	61.88
2022	23	612,895	7.3		40,867,651		7.0		66.68
2022	23	629,146	7.7		39,802,103		$	63.26
2023	19	628,662	7.4		35,419,718		6.1		56.34
2023	20	599,086	7.3		33,350,933		$	55.67
2024	10	133,521	1.6		11,687,308		2.0		87.53
2024	12	308,802	3.8		21,725,005		$	70.35
2025	23	533,810	6.3		51,300,009		8.8		96.10
2025 & thereafter	65	2,578,665	31.4		175,434,788		$	68.03
2026 & thereafter	77	2,960,544	35.0		188,598,291		32.2		63.70
Total/weighted average	~~352~~351	8,~~212~~452,~~917~~763	100.0	%	$	~~555~~585,~~833~~431,~~441~~582	$100.0	~~67.68~~%	$	69.26

____________________________________________________________________


(1)	Tenants may have multiple leases.

(2) Annualized Cash Rent of Expiring Leases represents the monthly contractual rent under existing leases as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 multiplied by 12. This amount reflects total rent before any rent abatements and includes expense reimbursements, which may be estimated as of such date. Total rent abatements for leases in effect as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for the 12 months ending December 31, 2016 will reduce cash rent by $3.5.1 million for the properties.


(3)	Annualized Cash Rent Per Leased Square Foot of Expiring Leases represents Annualized Cash Rent of Expiring Leases, as described in footnote (2) above, presented on a per leased square foot basis.

(4) Includes approximately 7822,~~265~~000 square feet and annualized cash rent of $41.02 million occupied by month-to-month holdover tenants whose leases expired prior to December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Leases in our Suburban portfolio, as at many other suburban operating properties, typically have an initial term of five to ten years. For the five years ending December 31, ~~2020~~2021, the average annual ~~rollover~~lease expirations at our Suburban operating properties is expected to be approximately 0.3 million square feet, representing an average annual expiration rate of approximately 10.56% per year (assuming no tenants exercise renewal or cancellation options and there are no tenant bankruptcies or other tenant defaults).

Table of Contents

The following tables set forth a schedule of the annual lease expirations at our Suburban operating properties with respect to leases in place as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for each of the next ten years and thereafter (assuming that no tenants exercise renewal or cancellation options and that there are no tenant bankruptcies or other tenant defaults):

Suburban Operating PropertiesYear of Lease Expiration	NumberofExpiringLeases(1)	SquareFootageofExpiringLeases	PercentageofTotalLeasedSquareFeet		AnnualizedCashRent ofExpiringLeases(2)		~~AnnualizedCashRent~~Percentage ~~PerLeasedSquareFoot~~of ~~ofExpiringLeases(3)~~Annualized Cash Rent of Expiring Leases		AnnualizedCashRent PerLeasedSquareFoot ofExpiringLeases(3)
2016(4)	40	278,323	11.0	%	$	9,882,743	$	35.51
2017(4)	27	127,075	4.8	%	$	4,646,234	5.4	%	$	36.56
2017	25	162,456	6.4		6,259,459		$	38.53
2018	35	229,773	8.7		7,864,983		9.1		34.23
2018	33	196,262	7.7		6,523,476		$	33.24
2019	40	446,768	17.0		12,905,913		14.9		28.89
2019	36	476,995	18.8		13,970,193		$	29.29
2020	24	245,929	9.4		9,308,651		10.8		37.85
2020	19	233,651	9.2		8,016,962		$	34.31
2021	32	381,475	14.5		12,543,179		14.5		32.88
2021	24	312,942	12.3		8,899,012		$	28.44
2022	19	86,402	3.3		3,533,849		4.1		40.90
2022	15	80,759	3.2		3,115,226		$	38.57
2023	14	141,176	5.4		4,503,599		5.2		31.90
2023	11	166,942	6.6		5,454,494		$	32.67
2024	13	199,386	7.6		6,809,238		7.9		34.15
2024	11	175,331	6.9		5,510,226		$	31.43
2025	11	121,100	4.6		4,194,917		4.9		34.64
2025 & thereafter	23	456,507	17.9		13,959,006		$	30.58
2026 & thereafter	27	650,132	24.7		20,087,411		23.2		30.90
Total/weighted average	~~237~~242	2,~~540~~629,~~168~~216	100.0	%	$	8186,~~590~~397,~~797~~974	$100.0	~~32.12~~%	$	32.86

____________________________________________________________________


(1)	Tenants may have multiple leases.


(3)	Annualized Cash Rent Per Leased Square Foot of Expiring Leases represents Annualized Cash Rent of Expiring Leases, as described in footnote (2) above, presented on a per leased square foot basis.

(4) Includes approximately 1032,~~695~~378 square feet and annualized cash rent of $01.42 million occupied by month-to-month holdover tenants whose leases expired prior to December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Tenant Diversification

At December 31, ~~2015~~2016, our Manhattan and Suburban office properties were leased to ~~582~~581 tenants, which are engaged in a variety of businesses, including professional services, financial services, media, apparel, business services and government/non-profit. The following table sets forth information regarding the leases with respect to the ~~ten~~10 largest tenants in our Manhattan and Suburban office properties, which are not intended to be representative of our tenants as a whole, based on the amount of square footage leased by our tenants as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016:

Tenant	Properties	Lease Expiration	TotalLeasedSquareFeet	Percentageof AggregatePortfolioLeasedSquareFeet		Percentageof AggregatePortfolioAnnualizedCashRent
Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP	919 Third Avenue	2021	~~575~~576,~~324~~867	4.9	%	3.8	%
Ralph Lauren Corporation	625 Madison Avenue	2019	~~362~~385,~~065~~325	3.13	%	4.57
C.B.S. Broadcasting, Inc.	555 West 57th Street	2023	~~303~~338,~~415~~527	2.69	%	2.24
Advance Magazine Group, Fairchild Publications	750 Third Avenue	2021	286,622	2.4	%	2.23
Schulte, Roth & Zabel LLP	919 Third Avenue	2036	263,186	2.2	%	1.56
BMW of Manhattan	555 West 57th Street	2022	227,782	1.9	%	1.1
Bloomberg LP	919 Third Avenue	2029	256,107	2.2		1.2
The City University of New York - CUNY	555 West 57th Street & 16 Court Street	2020, 2024 & 2030	227,622	1.9	%	1.6
BMW of Manhattan	555 West 57th Street	2022	227,782	1.9		1.1
Bloomberg LP	919 Third Avenue	2029	225,545	1.9	%	1.0
The City University of New York - CUNY	555 West 57th Street & 16 Court Street	2020, 2024 & 2030	227,622	1.9		1.6
Amerada Hess Corp.	1185 Avenue of the Americas	2027	181,569	1.5	%	2.4
Bloomingdales, Inc.	919 Third Avenue	2024	205,821	1.8		1.0
Newmark & Company Real Estate Inc.	125 Park Avenue, 110 East 42nd Street & 680 Washington Blvd.	2016, 2026 & 2031	178,955	1.5	%	1.6
Amerada Hess Corp.	1185 Avenue of the Americas	2027	181,569	1.5		2.4
Total			2,~~832~~949,~~085~~428	2325.91	%	2122.91	%

Table of Contents

Environmental Matters

We engaged independent environmental consulting firms to perform Phase I environmental site assessments on our portfolio, in order to assess existing environmental conditions. All of the Phase I assessments met the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard. Under the ASTM Standard, a Phase I environmental site assessment consists of a site visit, aan historical record review, a review of regulatory agency data bases and records, and interviews with on-site personnel, with the purpose of identifying potential environmental concerns associated with real estate. These environmental site assessments did not reveal any known environmental liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we were not involved in any material litigation nor, to management's knowledge, was any material litigation threatened against us or our portfolio ~~other~~which ~~than~~if ~~routine~~adversely ~~litigation~~determined ~~arising~~could inhave ~~the~~a ~~ordinary~~material ~~course~~adverse ofimpact ~~business~~on ~~or litigation that is adequately covered by insurance~~us.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

There is no established trading market for our common equity. As of March 229, ~~2016~~2017, there were two holders of our Class A common units, both of which are subsidiaries of SL Green.

Common Units

No distributions have been declared by ROP in respect of its Class A common units subsequent to the Merger on January 25, 2007.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

We did not sell any Class A common units during the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

None of the Class A common units were exchanged into shares of SL Green's common stock and cash in accordance with the Merger Agreement.

Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliate Purchasers

None.

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth our selected financial data and should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are restating our historical audited consolidated financial statements as a result of the transfer of two properties, SL Green's tenancy in common interest in a fee interest and one entity that held debt investments and financing receivables to us by SL Green. Under the Business Combinations guidance, these transfers were determined to be transfers of businesses between the indirect parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. As such, the assets and liabilities of the properties were transferred at their carrying values and were recorded as of the beginning of the current reporting period as though the assets and liabilities had been transferred at that date. The consolidated financial statements and financial information presented for all prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted to furnish comparative information.

	Year Ended December 31,
Operating Data (in thousands)	~~2015~~2016			~~2014~~2015			~~2013~~2014			~~2012~~2013			~~2011~~2012
				(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)
Total revenues	$	975,416		$	925,233		$	847,522		$	821,822		$	694,561
Total revenues	$	925,233		$	847,522		$	821,822		$	694,561		$	668,243
Operating expenses	166,137			163,969			154,374			146,548			143,068
Operating expenses	163,969			154,374			146,548			143,068			134,903
Real estate taxes	152,010			143,873			133,567			118,699			110,752
Real estate taxes	143,873			133,567			118,699			110,752			100,383
Ground rent	20,971			20,941			20,941			21,139			20,803
Ground rent	20,941			20,941			21,139			20,803			18,441
Interest expense, net of interest income	109,208			119,342			129,356			133,845			133,331
Interest expense, net of interest income	119,342			129,356			133,845			133,331			102,677
Amortization of deferred finance costs	7,918			7,519			7,810			8,460			9,435
Amortization of deferred finance costs	7,519			7,810			8,460			9,435			3,898
Depreciation and amortization	212,514			202,474			196,505			181,619			173,631
Depreciation and amortization	202,474			196,505			181,619			173,631			148,217
Loan loss reserves, net of recoveries	—			—			—			—			564
Loan loss reserves, net of recoveries	—			—			—			564			6,505
Transaction related costs	238			2,871			3,599			3,070			2,961
Transaction related costs	2,871			3,599			3,070			2,961			1,063
Marketing, general and administrative	720			464			372			362			344
Marketing, general and administrative	464			372			362			344			346
Total expenses	669,716			661,453			646,524			613,742			594,889
Total expenses	661,453			646,524			613,742			594,889			516,433
Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint venture	14,509			8,841			4,491			(17,108		)	(4,083		)
Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint venture	8,841			4,491			(17,108		)	(4,083		)	497
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture	—			—			85,559			2,056			1,001
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture	—			85,559			2,056			1,001			—
Gain on sale of real estate	(6,909		)	100,190			—			—			—
Gain on sale of real estate	100,190			—			—			—
Depreciable real estate reserves	—			(9,998		)	—			—			—
Depreciable real estate reserves	(9,998		)	—			—			—			(5,789		)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	—			(49		)	(7,385		)	(76		)	(6,904		)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	(49		)	(7,385		)	(76		)	(6,904		)	—
Income from continuing operations	313,300			362,764			283,663			192,952			89,686
Income from continuing operations	362,764			283,663			192,952			89,686			146,518
Discontinued operations	—			—			119,575			19,663			—
Discontinued operations	—			119,575			19,663			—			7,276
Net income	313,300			362,764			403,238			212,615			89,686
Net income	362,764			403,238			212,615			89,686			153,794
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(4,424		)	(9,169		)	(2,641		)	(5,200		)	(2,363		)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(9,169		)	(2,641		)	(5,200		)	(2,363		)	(9,763		)
Preferred units dividend	(3,821		)	(1,698		)	—			—			—
Preferred units dividend	(1,698		)	—			—			—			(19		)
Net income attributable to ROP common unitholder	$	305,055		$	351,897		$	400,597		$	207,415		$	87,323
Net income attributable to ROP common unitholder	$	351,897		$	400,597		$	207,415		$	87,323		$	144,012

	As of December 31,
Balance Sheet Data (in thousands)	~~2015~~2016		~~2014~~2015		~~2013~~2014		~~2012~~2013		~~2011~~2012
			(as adjusted)		(as adjusted)		(as adjusted)		(as adjusted)
Commercial real estate, before accumulated depreciation	$	7,508,870	$	7,428,243	$	7,203,216	$	6,670,210	$	6,289,687
Commercial real estate, before accumulated depreciation	$	7,428,243	$	7,203,216	$	6,670,210	$	6,289,687	$	5,800,432
Total assets	8,754,613		8,833,317		8,303,773		7,742,056		7,408,481
Total assets	8,858,747		8,303,773		7,742,056		7,408,481		6,334,914
Mortgage note and other loan payable, revolving credit facility and term loan and senior unsecured notes	1,855,589		2,660,297		2,893,001		2,758,137		2,559,233
Mortgage note and other loan payable, revolving credit facility and term loan and senior unsecured notes	3,735,530		2,893,001		2,758,137		2,559,233		2,403,334
Total capital	5,528,823		4,586,952		5,080,081		4,595,574		4,480,226
Total capital	4,586,952		5,080,081		4,595,574		4,480,226		3,539,623

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF

OPERATIONS

Overview

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P., or ROP, commenced operations on June 2, 1995. The sole general partner of ROP is Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC., or WAGP, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P., or the Operating Partnership. The sole limited partner of ROP is the Operating Partnership. SL Green Realty Corp., or SL Green, is the general partner of the Operating Partnership. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references to "we," "our," "us" and the "Company" means ROP and all entities owned or controlled by ROP.

ROP is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, management and operation of commercial and residential real estate properties, principally office properties, and also owns land for future development, located in New York City, Westchester County, Connecticut and New Jersey, which collectively is also known as the New York Metropolitan area.

The following discussion related to our consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements appearing in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The New York City commercial real estate market ~~continued~~remained tostrong ~~strengthen~~ in ~~2015~~2016, and we took advantage of this ~~strengthening~~ market in improving ~~occupancies~~asking rents and ~~deploying~~strategically ~~capital~~selling inor ~~the~~forming ~~borough~~joint ofventure ~~Manhattan~~properties toat ~~strategically~~attractive ~~position~~market ~~the Company for future growth~~valuations.

Leasing and Operating

In ~~2015~~2016, SL Green's same-store Manhattan office property occupancy ~~based~~was on97.1% ~~leases~~compared ~~signed increased~~ to 97.1% ~~from 95.7%~~ in the prior year. SL Green signed office leases in Manhattan encompassing approximately 2.3.2 million square feet, of which approximately 02.96 million square feet represented office leases that replaced previously occupied space. SL Green's mark-to-market on these approximately 02.96 million square feet of signed Manhattan office leases that replaced previously occupied space was 1527.36% for ~~2015~~2016.

According to Cushman ~~and~~& Wakefield, new leasing activity in Manhattan in ~~2015~~2016 totaled approximately 2826.2 3 million square feet. Of the total ~~2015~~2016 leasing activity in Manhattan, the Midtown submarket accounted for approximately 1817.59 million square feet, or approximately 6568.61%. Midtown's overall office vacancy ~~decreased~~increased from 98.35% at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 to 89.53% at December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Overall average asking rents in Manhattan increased in 2016 by 1.7% from $6771.7058 per square foot at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 to $7172.5882 per square foot at December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Midtown Manhattan average asking rents increased in 2016 by 2.3% from $7576.1465 per square foot at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 to $7678.6539 per square foot at December 31, ~~2015~~2016. The Midtown South average asking rent rose 141.7% year-over-year to $6970.6686 per square foot while downtown average asking rents ~~increased~~decreased 160.75% year-over-year to $59.5830 per square foot.

Assets Transfer

In 2015, SL Green transferred two properties and SL Green's tenancy in common interest in a fee interest with a total value of $395.0 million to ROP. Additionally, in 2015, SL Green transferred one ~~property~~entity that held debt investments and financing receivables with an aggregate carrying value of $1.7 billion to ROP. During ~~2014~~2015, SL Green transferred five properties with a total value aggregating $884.3 million to ROP. These transfers were made to further diversify ROP's portfolio. ~~These transfers were made to further diversify ROP's portfolio.~~ Under the business combinations guidance (Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, 805-50), these transfers were determined to be transfers of businesses between the indirect parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. As such, the assets and liabilities of the properties were transferred at their carrying values and were recorded as of the beginning of the current reporting period as though the assets and liabilities had been transferred at that date. The consolidated financial statements and financial information presented for all prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted to furnish comparative information.

Table of Contents

Location	Type	Number ofProperties	Approximate Square Feet	Weighted AverageOccupancy(1)
Commercial:
Manhattan	Office	16	8,463,245	9496.94	%
	Retail(2)(3)	5	352,892	97.6	%
	Fee Interest	2	197,654	100.0	%
		23	9,013,791	9596.15	%
Suburban	Office	1918	3,~~287~~251,~~800~~000	8083.02	%
	Retail	1	52,000	100.0	%
		20	3,339,800	80.3	%
		19	3,303,000	83.4	%
Total commercial properties		4342	12,~~353~~316,~~591~~791	9193.10	%
Residential:
Manhattan	Residential(2)	—	222,855	8993.51	%
Total portfolio		4342	12,~~576~~539,~~446~~646	9193.10	%

____________________________________________________________________

(2) As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we owned a building that was comprised of approximately 270,132 square feet of retail space and approximately 222,855 square feet of residential space. For the purpose of this report, we have included the building in the number of retail properties ~~count~~we ~~and~~own. However, we have ~~bifurcated~~included only the retail square footage ~~into~~in the retail approximate square footage, and have listed the balance of the square footage as residential ~~components~~square footage.


(3)	Includes two unconsolidated joint venture retail properties at 131-137 Spring Street comprised of approximately 68,342 square feet.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Investment in Commercial Real Estate Properties

On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indications that the value of our real estate properties may be other than temporarily impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. A property's value is considered impaired if management's estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted ~~and without interest charges for consolidated properties~~) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the calculated fair value of the property.

We also evaluate our real estate properties for potential impairment when a real estate property has been classified as held for sale. Real estate assets held for sale are valued at the lower of either their carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. ~~Except as~~We ~~discussed below, we~~ do not believe that there were any indicators of impairment at any of our consolidated properties at December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we recorded a $10.0 million charge in connection with the sale of one of our properties, which closed in the fourth quarter of 2015. This charge is included in depreciable real estate reserves in the consolidated statements of operations. ~~Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2015, we do not believe that there were any indicators of impairment at this property. See Note 4, "Property Dispositions."~~

Table of Contents

complete and capitalization must cease involves a degree of judgment. The costs of land and building under development include specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include, but are not limited to, pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs and other costs incurred during the period of development. We consider a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year after major construction activity ~~ceases~~is completed. We cease capitalization on the portions substantially completed and occupied or held available for occupancy, and capitalize only those costs associated with the portions under construction.

We recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed (including contingencies) and any noncontrolling interests in an acquired entity at their fair values on the acquisition date. We expense transaction costs related to the acquisition of certain assets as incurred, which are included in transaction related costs on our consolidated statements of operations. Results of operations of properties acquired are included in the consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition.

We allocate the purchase price of real estate to land and building (inclusive of tenant improvements) and, if determined to be material, intangibles, such as the value of above- and below-market leases and origination costs associated with the in-place leases. We depreciate the amount allocated to building (inclusive of tenant improvements) over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from three to 40 years. We amortize the amount allocated to the above- and below-market leases over the remaining term of the associated lease, which generally range from one to 14 years, and record it as either an increase (in the case of below-market leases) or a decrease (in the case of above-market leases) to rental income. We amortize the amount allocated to the values associated with in-place leases over the expected term of the associated lease, which generally ranges from one to 14 years. If a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related intangible will be written off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the lease (or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date). We assess fair value of the leases based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. To the extent acquired leases contain fixed rate renewal options that are below-market and determined to be material, we amortize such below-market lease value into rental income over the renewal period.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

We account for our investment in the unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting in cases where we exercise significant influence over, but do not control, ~~the~~these ~~entity~~entities and are not considered to be the primary beneficiary. We consolidate those joint ventures that we control or which are VIEs and where we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. In all the joint ventures, the rights of the joint venture partner are both protective as well as participating. Unless we are determined to be the primary beneficiary in a VIE, these participating rights preclude us from consolidating these VIE entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in net income (loss) and cash contributions and distributions. Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures is allocated based on our ownership or economic interest in ~~the~~each joint venture. When a capital event (as defined in each joint venture agreement) such as a refinancing occurs, if return thresholds are met, future equity income will be allocated at our increased economic interest. We recognize incentive income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures as income to the extent it is earned and not subject to a clawback feature. Distributions we receive from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in excess of our basis in the investment are recorded as offsets to our investment balance if we remain liable for future obligations of the joint venture or may otherwise be committed to provide future additional financial support. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to us. See Note 56, "~~Debt,~~Investments ~~Preferred~~in ~~Equity~~Unconsolidated ~~and Other~~ Investments."

We assess our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for recoverability, and if it is determined that a loss in value of the investment is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate our equity investments for impairment based on the joint venture's projected discounted cash flows. We do not believe that the values of any of our equity investments were impaired at December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

We may originate loans for real estate acquisition, development and construction, where we expect to receive some of the residual profit from such projects. When the risk and rewards of these arrangements are essentially the same as an investor or joint venture partner, we account for these arrangements as real estate investments under the equity method of accounting for investments. Otherwise, we account for these arrangements consistent with our loan accounting for our debt and preferred equity investments.

Revenue Recognition

Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The excess of rents recognized over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases are included in deferred rents receivable on the consolidated balance sheets. We establish, on a current basis, an allowance for future potential tenant credit losses, which may occur against this account. The balance reflected on the consolidated balance sheets is net of such allowance.

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

We record a gain on sale of real estate when title is conveyed to the buyer, subject to the buyer's financial commitment being sufficient to provide economic substance to the sale and provided that we have no substantial economic involvement with the buyer.

Interest income on debt and preferred equity investments is accrued based on the ~~outstanding principal amount and~~ contractual terms of the instruments and when, in the opinion of management, it is deemed collectible. Some debt and preferred equity investments provide for accrual of interest at specified rates, which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management's determination that accrued interest is ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower. If management cannot make this determination, interest income above the current pay rate is recognized only upon actual receipt.

Debt and preferred equity investments are placed on a non-accrual status at the earlier of the date at which payments become 90 days past due or when, in the opinion of management, a full recovery of interest income becomes doubtful. Interest income recognition on any non-accrual debt or preferred equity investment is resumed when such non-accrual debt or preferred equity investment becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed. Interest is recorded as income on impaired loans only to the extent cash is received.

We may syndicate a portion of the loans that we originate or sell the loans individually. When a transaction meets the criteria for sale accounting, we derecognize the loan sold and recognize gain or loss based on the difference between the sales price and the carrying value of the loan sold. Any related unamortized deferred origination fees, original issue discounts, loan origination costs, discounts or premiums at the time of sale are recognized as an adjustment to the gain or loss on sale, which is included in investment income on the consolidated statements of operations. Any fees received at the time of sale or syndication are recognized as part of investment income.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our tenants to make required payments. If the financial condition of a specific tenant were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of its ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Reserve for Possible Credit Losses

The expense for possible credit losses in connection with debt and preferred equity investments is the charge to earnings to increase the allowance for possible credit losses to the level that we estimate to be adequate, based on Level 3 data, considering delinquencies, loss experience and collateral quality. Other factors considered include geographic trends, product diversification, the size of the portfolio and current economic conditions. Based upon these factors, we establish a provision for possible credit loss on each individual investment. When it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts contractually due, the investment is considered impaired.

Where impairment is indicated on an investment that is held to maturity, a valuation allowance is measured based upon the excess of the recorded investment amount over the net fair value of the collateral. Any deficiency between the carrying amount of an asset and the calculated value of the collateral is charged to expense. We continue to assess or adjust our estimates based on circumstances of a loan and the underlying collateral. If additional information reflects increased recovery of our investment, we will adjust our reserves accordingly. There were no loan reserves recorded during years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, ~~2014~~ and ~~2013~~2014.

Debt and preferred equity investments held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair market value using available market information obtained through consultation with dealers or other originators of such investments as well as discounted cash flow models based on Level 3 data pursuant to ASC 820-10. As circumstances change, management may conclude not to sell an investment designated as held for sale. In such situations, the investment will be reclassified at its net carrying value to debt and preferred equity investments held to maturity. For these reclassified investments, the difference between the current carrying value and the expected cash to be collected at maturity will be accreted into income over the remaining term of the investment.

Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, we use a variety of commonly used derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, caps, collar and floors, to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk. Effectiveness is essential for those derivatives that we intend to qualify for hedge accounting. Some derivative instruments are associated with an anticipated transaction. In those cases, hedge effectiveness criteria also require that it be probable that the underlying transaction occurs. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract.

Table of Contents

Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, we use a variety of commonly used derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors, to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk. Effectiveness is essential for those derivatives that we intend to qualify for hedge accounting. Some derivative instruments are associated with an anticipated transaction. In those cases, hedge effectiveness criteria also require that it be probable that the underlying transaction occurs. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract.

To determine the fair values of derivative instruments, we use a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date. For the majority of financial instruments including most derivatives, long-term investments and long-term debt, standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option-pricing models, replacement cost, and termination cost are used to determine fair value. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value, and such value may never actually be realized.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2016 to the year ended December 31, 2015

The following section compares the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 to the year ended December 31, 2015. Any assets sold or held for sale are excluded from income from continuing operations. The explanations below may make reference to "Same-Store Properties" which represents all operating properties owned by us at January 1, 2015 and still owned by us in the same manner at December 31, 2016.



(in thousands)	2016			2015			$ Change			% Change

Rental revenue, net	$	652,629		$	621,121		$	31,508		5.1	%
Escalation and reimbursement	104,683			95,894			8,789			9.2	%
Investment income	214,102			182,648			31,454			17.2	%
Other income	4,002			25,570			(21,568		)	(84.3	)%
Total revenues	975,416			925,233			50,183			5.4	%

Property operating expenses	339,118			328,783			10,335			3.1	%
Transaction related costs	238			2,871			(2,633		)	(91.7	)%
Marketing, general and administrative	720			464			256			55.2	%
Total expenses	340,076			332,118			7,958			2.4	%

Net operating income	635,340			593,115			42,225			7.1	%

Interest expense and amortization of financing costs, net of interest income	(117,126		)	(126,861		)	9,735			(7.7	)%
Depreciation and amortization	(212,514		)	(202,474		)	(10,040		)	5.0	%
Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures	14,509			8,841			5,668			64.1	%
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture	—			—			—			—	%
(Loss) gain on sale of real estate	(6,909		)	100,190			(107,099		)	(106.9	)%
Depreciable real estate reserves	—			(9,998		)	9,998			100.0	%
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	—			(49		)	49			(100.0	)%
Income from continuing operations	313,300			362,764			(49,464		)	(13.6	)%
Net income from discontinued operations	—			—			—			—	%
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	—			—			—			—	%
Net income	$	313,300		$	362,764		$	(49,464	)	(13.6	)%

Rental, Escalation and Reimbursement Revenues

Rental revenue increased primarily as a result of an increase in rents at our Same-Store properties ($35.9 million), which includes increased rental revenue at 752 Madison Avenue resulting from a lease renewal in the fourth quarter of 2015 ($12.1 million). Rental revenues increased as a result of acquired properties ($7.1 million), which includes the acquisition of 110 Greene Street in July 2015 ($11.4 million). These increases were partially offset by decreased revenues resulting from the 80% sale of 131-137 Spring Street in third quarter of 2015 ($5.4 million), the sale of 140-150 Grand Street in the fourth quarter of 2015 ($3.0

Table of Contents

million), and 115 Spring Street as a result of the accelerated recognition of non-cash deferred income upon terminating the retail lease at the property in 2015 ($3.0 million).

Escalation and reimbursement revenue increased primarily as a result of higher real estate tax recoveries ($3.7 million), and operating expense escalations and electric reimbursements ($3.8 million).

Occupancy in our Manhattan office operating properties increased to 96.4% at December 31, 2016 compared to 94.9% at December 31, 2015. Occupancy in our Suburban office operating properties increased to 83.2% at December 31, 2016 compared to 79.8% at December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, approximately 3.8% and 4.8% of the space leased at our Manhattan and Suburban operating properties, respectively, is expected to expire during 2017. Based on our estimates, the current market asking rents on these expected 2017 lease expirations at our consolidated Manhattan operating properties are 7.5% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents while the current market asking rents on all our consolidated Manhattan operating properties are 6.6% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents that are scheduled to expire in all future years. Based on our estimates, the current market asking rents on these expected 2016 lease expirations at our consolidated Suburban operating properties are 4.7% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents while the current market asking rents on all our consolidated Suburban operating properties are 8.0% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents that are scheduled to expire in all future years.

Investment Income

Investment income increased primarily as a result of additional income recognized from the recapitalization of a debt investment ($41.0 million). This increase was partially offset by a lower weighted average yield and balance for the year ended December 31, 2016. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, the weighted average debt and preferred equity investment balance outstanding and weighted average yield were $1.5 billion and 9.7%, respectively, compared to $1.7 billion and 10.3%, respectively, for the same period in 2015. As of December 31, 2016, the debt and preferred equity investments had a fully extended weighted average term to maturity of 3.0 years.

Other Income

Other income decreased primarily as a result of a lease termination fee received at 919 Third Avenue in 2015 ($14.5 million) and a non-recurring fee related to the settlement of a previous investment ($6.5 million) in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Property Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses increased primarily as a result of higher real estate taxes resulting from higher assessed values and tax rates ($8.6 million).

Interest Expense and Amortization of Financing Costs, Net of Interest Income

Interest expense and amortization of financing costs, net of interest income, decreased primarily as a result of a lower weighted average balance of the revolving credit facility in 2016 ($8.4 million) and a lower weighted average balance of the Master Repurchase Agreement ($2.2 million). The weighted average consolidated debt balance outstanding was $3.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016. The weighted average interest rate was 3.64% for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of the acquisition of 110 Greene Street in the third quarter of 2015 ($10.2 million), partially offset by the sale of an 80% interest in 131-137 Spring Street in the third quarter of 2015 ($2.1 million).

Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures

Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased primarily as a result of the contribution of a debt

investment to an unconsolidated joint venture in March 2016 ($4.5 million).

(Loss) gain on Sale of Real Estate

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized a loss on the sale of 7 International Drive, Westchester County, NY ($6.9 million). During the year ended December 31, 2015 we recognized a gain on sale associated with the sale of an 80% interest in 131-137 Spring Street ($101.1 million).

Depreciable Real Estate Reserves

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a $10.0 million charge in connection with the sale of 140 Grand Street.

Table of Contents

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt

Loss on early extinguishment of debt during the year ended December 31, 2015 was a result of the early repayment of debt at 711 Third Avenue.

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2015 to the year ended December 31, 2014

The following section compares the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 to the year ended December 31, 2014 ~~for the 43 properties owned by ROP~~. The Company adopted ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015. As a result, the Company classified 140 Grand Street as held for sale as of September 30, 2015 and included the results of operations in continuing operations for all periods presented. Any assets sold or held for sale prior to January 1, 2015 were excluded from income from continuing operations and from the following discussion.

(in thousands)	2015			2014			$Change			%Change
				(as adjusted)
Rental revenue, net	$	621,121		$	574,150		$	46,971		8.2	%
Escalation and reimbursement	95,894			92,850			3,044			3.3	%
Investment income	182,648			176,901			5,747			3.2	%
Other income	25,570			3,621			21,949			606.2	%
Total revenues	~~925,233~~$	925,233		~~847,522~~$	847,522		~~77,711~~$	77,711		9.2	%
Property operating expenses	328,783			308,882			19,901			6.4	%
Transaction related costs	2,871			3,599			(728		)	(20.2	)%
Marketing, general and administrative	464			372			92			24.7	%
	332,118			312,853			19,265			6.2	%
Net operating income	593,115			534,669			58,446			10.9	%
Interest expense and amortization of financing costs, net of interest income	(126,861		)	(137,166		)	10,305			(7.5	)%
Depreciation and amortization	(202,474		)	(196,505		)	(5,969		)	3.0	%
Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures	8,841			4,491			4,350			96.9	%
Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint venture	8,841			4,491			4,350			96.9	%
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture	—			85,559			(85,559		)	(100.0	)%
Gain on sale of real estate	100,190			—			100,190			100.0	%
Depreciable real estate reserves	(9,998		)	—			(9,998		)	100.0	%
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	(49		)	(7,385		)	7,336			(99.3	)%
Income from continuing operations	362,764			283,663			79,101			27.9	%
Net income from discontinued operations	—			1,996			(1,996		)	(100.0	)%
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	—			117,579			(117,579		)	(100.0	)%
Net income	$	362,764		$	403,238		$	(40,474	)	(10.0	)%

Rental, Escalation and Reimbursement Revenues

Rental revenue increased primarily as a result of an increase in occupancy ($26.6 million), the acquisitions of three properties in 2014 ($12.7 million), one property that was placed in service in July 2015 ($6.6 million) and one property which we acquired in July 2015 ($3.7 million), partially offset by the sale of an 80% interest in 131-137 Spring Street in August 2015 which resulted in deconsolidation of the property ($4.9 million).

Escalation and reimbursement revenue increased primarily as a result of higher real estate tax recoveries ($4.3 million), partially offset by lower operating expense escalations and electric reimbursements ($1.3 million).

Occupancy in our Manhattan office operating properties was 94.9% at December 31, 2015 compared to 91.7% at December 31, 2014. Occupancy in our Suburban office operating properties was 80.0% at December 31, 2015 compared to 79.8% at December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2015, approximately 6.3% and 10.5% of the space leased at our Manhattan and Suburban operating properties, respectively, is expected to expire during 2016. Based on our estimates, the current market asking rents on these expected 2016 lease expirations at our consolidated Manhattan operating properties are 9.6% higher than the existing inplace fully escalated rents while the current market asking rents on all our consolidated Manhattan operating properties are 11.0% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents that are scheduled to expire in all future years. Based on our estimates, the current market

2628

Table of Contents

~~these expected 2016 lease expirations at our consolidated Manhattan operating properties are 9.6% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents while the current market~~ asking rents on all our consolidated Manhattan operating properties are 11.0% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents that are scheduled to expire in all future years. Based on our estimates, the current market asking rents on these expected 2016 lease expirations at our consolidated Suburban operating properties are 8.6% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents while the current market asking rents on all our consolidated Suburban operating properties are 7.8% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents that are scheduled to expire in all future years.

Investment Income

Investment income increased primarily as a result of higher average investment balances for the year ended December 31, 2015. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, the weighted average debt and preferred equity investment balance outstanding and weighted average yield were $1.7 billion and 10.3%, respectively, compared to $1.4 billion and 10.5%, respectively, for the same period in 2014. In addition, we recognized additional income as a result of the early repayment of certain mortgage and mezzanine positions ($2.5 million) and the sale of a junior mortgage position ($1.2 million). This increase was partially offset by additional income recognized in 2014 on a mezzanine investment for which the underlying property was sold in June 2014 ($10.1 million) and a financing receivable on which we began accruing interest following the completion of the development of the underlying property ($5.3 million). As of December 31, 2015, the debt and preferred equity investments had a weighted average term to maturity of 1.7 years as compared to a weighted average term to maturity of 2.0 years as of December 31, 2014.

Other Income

Other income increased primarily as a result of a lease termination fee received at 919 Third Avenue in 2015 ($14.5 million) and a non-recurring fee related to the settlement of a previous investment ($6.5 million).

Property Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses increased primarily as a result of higher real estate taxes resulting from higher assessed values and tax rates ($10.3 million), professional fees ($2.4 million), repairs and maintenance ($2.0 million) and payroll ($1.1 million).

Interest Expense and Amortization of Financing Costs, Net of Interest Income

Interest expense and amortization of financing costs, net of interest income, decreased primarily as a result of the repayment of mortgages at 625 Madison Avenue ($8.4 million) and 125 Park Avenue ($4.3 million) during the fourth quarter of 2014 and 711 Third ($4.8 million) in the first quarter of 2015, redemption of a preferred equity investments which secured a loan during the fourth quarter of 2014 ($3.8 million) and the repayment of 5.875% senior notes in August 2014 ($2.8 million), partially offset by increased borrowings on the 2012 credit facility ($10.9 million) and one property that was placed in service ($2.6 million).

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of the properties acquired in 2014 ($5.7 million) and one property that was placed into service in July 2015 ($1.7 million). These increases were partially offset by the sale of an 80% interest in 131-137 Spring Street in August 2015 which resulted in deconsolidation of the property ($3.0 million).

Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures

Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint venture increased primarily as a result of the net loss recognized in 2013 from a portfolio of office properties in Southern California, or the "West Coast portfolio," which were sold in March 2014 ($2.4 million) and the origination of another investment accounted for under the equity method accounting as a result of meeting the criteria of a real estate investment under the guidance of Acquisition, Development and Construction arrangement in 2014 ($1.8 million).

Equity in Net Gain on Sale of Unconsolidated Joint Venture

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded gains on the sale of our West Coast portfolio ($85.6 million).

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a gain on sale associated with the sale of an 80% interest in 131-137 Spring Street ($101.1 million). This gain was offset by a charge in connection with the sale of 140 Grand Street.

Depreciable Real Estate Reserves

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded a $10.0 million charge in connection with the sale of 140 Grand Street.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt

Loss on early extinguishment of debt during the year ended December 31, 2014 was a result of the early repayment of debt at 625 Madison Avenue ($6.9 million) and 16 Court Street, Brooklyn ($0.5 million).

Table of Contents

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2014 to the year ended December 31, 2013

The following section compares the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 to the year ended December 31, 2013 for the 42 properties owned by ROP. Acquisition properties represent properties acquired in 2014 or 2013 and properties transferred to us by SL Green following its acquisition. Any assets sold or held for sale are excluded from income from continuing operations.

(in thousands)	2014			2013			$Change			%Change
	(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)
Rental revenue, net	$	574,150		$	535,969		$	38,181		7.1	%
Escalation and reimbursement	92,850			86,366			6,484			7.5	%
Investment income	176,901			194,612			(17,711		)	(9.1	)%
Other income	3,621			4,875			(1,254		)	(25.7	)%
Total revenues	$	847,522		$	821,822		$	25,700		3.1	%
Property operating expenses	308,882			286,386			22,496			7.9	%
Transaction related costs	3,599			3,070			529			17.2	%
Marketing, general and administrative	372			362			10			2.8	%
	312,853			289,818			23,035			7.9	%
Net operating income	534,669			532,004			2,665			0.5	%
Interest expense and amortization of financing costs, net of interest income	(137,166		)	(142,305		)	5,139			(3.6	)%
Depreciation and amortization	(196,505		)	(181,619		)	(14,886		)	8.2	%
Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint venture	4,491			(17,108		)	21,599			(126.3	)%
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture	85,559			2,056			83,503			4,061.4	%
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	(7,385		)	(76		)	(7,309		)	9,617.1	%
Income from continuing operations	283,663			192,952			90,711			47.0	%
Net income from discontinued operations	1,996			5,907			(3,911		)	(66.2	)%
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	117,579			13,756			103,823			754.7	%
Net income	$	403,238		$	212,615		$	190,623		89.7	%

Rental, Escalation and Reimbursement Revenues

Rental revenue increased primarily as a result of the acquisitions of 315 West 33rd Street in November 2013 ($22.9 million) and 16 Court Street, Brooklyn ($3.7 million), increase in occupancy at 1185 Avenue of the Americas ($7.8 million), and a one-time write-off of value for above-market leases associated with a former tenant ($6.8 million) in 2013.

Escalation and reimbursement revenue increased primarily as a result of the acquisition of 315 West 33rd Street in November 2013 ($4.0 million) and higher real estate tax recoveries from non-acquisition properties ($2.6 million).

Occupancy in our Manhattan office properties was 91.7% at December 31, 2014 compared to 92.9% at December 31, 2013. Occupancy in our Suburban office properties was 79.8% at December 31, 2014 compared to 78.3% at December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2014, excluding the impact of the properties transferred in 2015, approximately 1.9% and 6.8% of the space leased at our Manhattan and Suburban office properties, respectively, is expected to expire during 2015. Based on our estimates, the current market asking rents on all our Manhattan operating properties for leases that are expected to expire during 2015 would be approximately 42.3% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents while the current market asking rents on all our Manhattan operating properties for leases that are scheduled to expire in future years would be approximately 10.4% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents. Based on our estimates, the current market asking rents on all our Suburban operating properties for leases that are expected to expire during 2015 would be approximately 2.5% lower than the existing in-place fully escalated rents while the current market asking rents on all our Suburban operating properties for leases that are scheduled to expire in future years would be approximately 3.2% higher than the existing in-place fully escalated rents.

Table of Contents

Investment Income

Investment income decreased primarily as a result of a lower weighted average yield on the debt and preferred equity portfolio, a gain on sale of 50% of our interest in one of our debt investments in 2013 ($12.9 million), additional income from the repayment of one of our debt investments in 2013 ($6.4 million), a one-time recognition of unrecognized interest ($6.1 million) related to one of our preferred equity investments in 2013, and the redemption of one of our preferred equity investments in April 2014 ($1.2 million), partially offset by a higher investment balance in 2014, additional income recognized on a mezzanine investment when the underlying property was sold in June 2014 ($10.1 million) and financing receivable on which we began accruing interest following the completion of the development of the underlying property ($5.3 million). The weighted average investment balance outstanding and weighted average yield were $1.4 billion and 10.5%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $1.3 billion and 11.2%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, our debt and preferred equity investments had a weighted average term to maturity of 2.0 years.

Other Income

Other income decreased primarily as a result of lower lease buy-out income ($0.9 million).

Property Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses increased primarily as a result of the acquisition of 315 West 33rd Street ($13.0 million) and 16 Court Street, Brooklyn ($1.5 million) and higher real estate taxes resulting from higher assessed values and tax rates from non-acquisition properties ($7.2 million).

Transaction Related Costs

Transaction related costs increased primarily as a result of higher investment activity during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Interest Expense and Amortization of Financing Costs, Net of Interest Income

Interest expense, net of interest income, decreased primarily as a result of the capitalization of interest relating to properties under development or redevelopment ($3.8 million), decreased average borrowings under the master repurchase agreement facility ($1.8 million) and the repayment of 5.875% senior notes in August 2014 ($1.7 million) and debt at 125 Park Avenue ($1.6 million) and 16 Court Street, Brooklyn ($1.2 million) in 2014. The decrease in interest expense was partially offset by higher interest as a result of increased borrowing on the 2012 credit facility ($6.1 million).

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of the acquisition of 315 West 33rd Street ($14.3 million) and 16 Court Street, Brooklyn ($1.6 million), partially offset by a one-time write-off of tenant improvements and value for in-place leases associated with a former tenant ($4.7 million) in 2013.

Equity in Net Income from Unconsolidated Joint Venture

Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint venture increased primarily as a result of net loss recognized in 2013 from the portfolio of offices properties primarily in Southern California, or the "West Coast Office Portfolio" ($18.7 million) which interest was sold in March 2014 and a debt and preferred equity investment that was originated in the first quarter of 2014 ($6.9 million), which has been accounted for as an equity investment as a result of meeting the criteria of a real estate investment under the Acquisition, Development and Construction arrangement. These increases were partially offset by early redemption of the underlying preferred equity investment of our equity investment in 2013 ($3.9 million).

Equity in Net Gain on Sale of Unconsolidated Joint Venture

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded gains on the sale of our West Coast portfolio ($85.6 million). During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized gains on the sale of three properties in the West Coast portfolio ($2.1 million)

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes the gain recognized on the sale of 673 First Avenue ($117.6 million) and the results of its operations. Discontinued operations for the year ended December, 2013 includes the gain recognized on the sale of 333 West 34th Street ($13.8 million). Prior year's results of operations of these sold properties were included in the net income from discontinued operations to conform to the current presentation.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On January 25, 2007, we were acquired by SL Green. See Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources" in SL Green and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 for a complete discussion of additional sources of liquidity available to us due to our indirect ownership by SL Green.

We currently expect that our principal sources of funds to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements for working capital, ~~acquisitions,~~and funds for acquisition and development or redevelopment of properties, tenant improvements, leasing costs, repurchases or repayments of outstanding indebtedness (which may include exchangeable debt) and for debt and preferred equity investments will include:

(1) ~~cash~~Cash flow from operations;

(2) ~~cash~~Cash on hand;

(3) ~~borrowings~~Borrowings under the 2012 credit facility;

(4) ~~other~~Other forms of secured or unsecured financing;

(5) ~~net~~Net proceeds from divestitures of properties and redemptions, participations and dispositions of debt and preferred equity investments; and

(6) ~~proceeds~~Proceeds from debt offerings by us.

Cash flow from operations is primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our portfolio, the net effective rental rates achieved on our leases, the collectability of rent, operating escalations and recoveries from our tenants and the level of operating and other costs. Additionally, we believe that our debt and preferred equity investment program will continue to serve as a source of operating cash flow.

We believe that our sources of working capital, specifically our cash flow from operations and SL Green's liquidity are adequate for us to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future.

Cash Flows

The following summary discussion of our cash flows is based on our consolidated statements of cash flows in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" and is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash flows for the periods presented below.

Cash and cash equivalents were $5059.09 million and $3450.70 million at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively, representing an increase of $159.39 million. The increase was a result of the following changes in cash flows (in thousands):

	Year ended December 31,
	2015			2014			Change
	2016			2015			Change
				(as adjusted)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	440,265		$	365,485		$	74,780
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	365,485		$	283,395		$	82,090
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(167,071	)	$	(225,874	)	$	58,803
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(225,874	)	$	(498,587	)	$	272,713
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	$	(263,290	)	$	(124,276	)	$	(139,014	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	$	(124,276	)	$	200,839		$	(325,115	)

Our principal source of operating cash flow is related to the leasing and operating of the properties in our portfolio. Our properties provide a relatively consistent stream of cash flow that provides us with resources to pay operating expenses, debt service and ~~make~~fund ~~distributions~~quarterly todividend ~~SL Green. At December 31, 2015, our Manhattan~~ and ~~Suburban~~distribution ~~consolidated office portfolio were 94~~requirements.9% ~~and 80.0% occupied, respectively.~~ Our debt and preferred equity and joint venture investments also provide a steady stream of operating cash flow to us.

Cash is used in investing activities to fund acquisitions, development or redevelopment projects and recurring and nonrecurring capital expenditures. We selectively invest in new projects that enable us to take advantage of our development, leasing, financing and property management skills and invest in existing buildings that meet our investment criteria. During the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, when compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we used cash primarily for the following investing activities (in thousands):

Table of Contents

Acquisitions of real estate	$	~~407~~109,~~902~~633
Capital expenditures and capitalized interest	12(37,~~907~~202		)
Net proceeds from sale of real estate/joint venture interest	1(195,~~024~~767		)
Joint venture investments	58(24,~~412~~385		)
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures	28(27,~~459~~155		)
Debt, preferred and other investments	~~(235~~233,~~927~~500		)
Restricted cash—capital improvements	~~(64~~179		)
Decrease in net cash used in investing activities	$	~~272~~58,~~713~~803

Funds spent on capital expenditures, which comprise building and tenant improvements, ~~decreased~~increased from $~~102~~90.90 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 compared to $90127.02 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016. The ~~decrease~~increased in capital expenditures relate primarily to ~~lower~~increased costs incurred in connection with the redevelopment of a property and the build-out of space for tenants.

We generally fund our investment activity through the sale of real estate, property-level financing, our 2012 credit facility, our MRA facility, senior unsecured notes, ~~and~~convertible ~~sale~~or ofexchangeable ~~real~~securities, ~~estate~~and construction loans. During the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, when compared to the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we used cash for the following financing activities (in thousands):

Repayments under our debt obligations	$	(31411,~~471~~172	)
Proceeds from debt obligations	~~745~~(1,~~802~~499,335		)
Contributions from common unitholder and noncontrolling interests	~~(482~~1,~~479~~279,628		)
Distributions to common and preferred unitholder and noncontrolling interests	~~(576~~453,~~137~~262		)
Obligation related to mortgage loan participation	25,000
Deferred loan costs and capitalized lease obligation	4,453
Deferred loan costs	(5,830		)
Other obligation related to mortgage loan participation	34,150
Increase in cash used in financing activities	$	(~~325~~139,~~115~~014	)

Capitalization

All of our issued and outstanding Class A common units are owned by Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC or the Operating Partnership.

Corporate Indebtedness

2012 Credit Facility

In ~~July~~August ~~2015~~2016, we entered into ~~the~~an ~~third~~ amendment to the credit facility that was originally entered into by the Company in November 2012, referred to as the 2012 credit facility. As of December 31, ~~which~~2016, ~~increased~~the ~~our~~2012 ~~unsecured~~credit ~~corporate~~facility, as amended, consisted of a $1.6 billion revolving credit facility byand a $~~500~~1.02 ~~million~~billion term loan, with a maturity date of March 29, 2019 and June 30, 2019, respectively. The revolving credit facility ~~was~~has ~~increased~~an byas-of-right ~~$400~~extension to March 29, 2020.0 ~~million~~We also have an option, subject to customary conditions, to increase the capacity under the revolving credit facility to $13.60 billion ~~and~~at ~~the~~any ~~term~~time ~~loan~~prior ~~portion~~to ofthe maturity date for the revolving credit facility ~~was~~without ~~increased~~the consent of existing lenders, by ~~$100.0~~obtaining ~~million~~additional tocommitments ~~$933.0~~from ~~million~~our existing lenders and other financial institutions.

InAs ~~January~~of ~~2015~~December 31, we2016, ~~amended~~ the 2012 credit facility bybore ~~entering~~interest ~~into~~at a ~~second~~spread ~~amended~~over ~~and~~LIBOR ~~restated~~ranging ~~credit~~from ~~agreement,~~(i) 87.5 ~~which~~basis ~~decreased~~points ~~the~~to ~~interest-rate~~155 ~~margin~~basis ~~and~~points ~~facility~~for ~~fee~~loans ~~applicable~~under to the revolving credit facility byand 20(ii) 95 basis points ~~and~~to ~~five~~190 basis points, ~~respectively,~~for ~~and~~loans ~~extended~~under the ~~maturity~~term ~~date~~loan offacility, ~~the~~in ~~revolving~~each ~~credit~~case ~~facility~~based toon ~~March~~the ~~29,~~credit ~~2019~~rating ~~with~~assigned anto ~~as-of-right~~the ~~extension~~senior ~~through~~unsecured ~~March~~long ~~29,~~term ~~2020~~indebtedness of ROP.

InAt ~~November~~December 31, ~~2014~~2016, wethe ~~increased~~applicable spread was 0.0125 basis points for the revolving credit facility and 0.014 basis points for the term loan ~~portion~~facility. ofAt December 31, 2016, the effective interest rate was 1.78% for the revolving credit facility byand ~~$50~~1.096% ~~million~~for the term loan facility. We are required to ~~$833~~pay quarterly in arrears a 12.05 ~~million~~basis points to 30 basis point facility fee on the total commitments under the revolving credit facility based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP. As of December 31, 2016, the facility fee was 25 basis points.

InAs ~~March~~of ~~2014~~December 31, 2016, we ~~entered~~had ~~into~~$56.5 anmillion ~~amendment~~of tooutstanding letters of credit, zero drawn under the ~~2012~~revolving credit facility, ~~which~~and ~~among~~$1.2 ~~other~~billion ~~things,~~outstanding ~~increased~~under the term loan ~~portion~~facility, ofwith ~~the~~total ~~facility~~undrawn bycapacity of $~~383~~1.05 ~~million~~billion tounder ~~$783~~the 2012 credit facility.0 ~~million~~At December 31, ~~decreased~~2016 ~~the~~and ~~interest-rate~~December 31, ~~margin~~2015, ~~applicable~~the torevolving ~~the~~credit ~~term~~facility ~~loan~~had ~~portion~~a carrying value of ~~the~~$(6.3) ~~facility~~million, byrepresenting 25deferred ~~basis~~financing ~~points~~costs presented within other liabilities, and ~~extended~~$985.1 ~~the~~million, ~~maturity~~respectively, net of deferred financing costs. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the term loan ~~portion~~facility had a carrying value of ~~the~~$1.2 ~~facility~~billion ~~from~~and ~~March~~$929.5 30million, ~~2018~~respectively, tonet ~~June~~of ~~30,~~deferred ~~2019.~~financing costs.

As of December 31, 2015, the 2012 credit facility, as amended, consisted of a $1.6 billion revolving credit facility, or the revolving credit facility, and a $933.0 million term loan, or the term loan facility. We also have an option, subject to customary conditions, to increase the capacity under the revolving credit facility to $3.0 billion at any time prior to the maturity date for the revolving credit facility without the consent of existing lenders, by obtaining additional commitments from our existing lenders and other financial institutions.

As of December 31, 2015, the 2012 credit facility bore interest at a spread over LIBOR ranging from (i) 87.5 basis points to 155 basis points for loans under the revolving credit facility and (ii) 95 basis points to 190 basis points for loans under the term loan facility, in each case based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP. At December 31,

Table of Contents

2015, the applicable spread was 125 basis points for revolving credit facility and 140 basis points for the term loan facility. At December 31, 2015, the effective interest rate was 1.45% for the revolving credit facility and 1.67% for the term loan facility. We are required to pay quarterly in arrears a 12.5 basis points to 30 basis point facility fee on the total commitments under the revolving credit facility based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP. As of December 31, 2015, the facility fee was 25 basis points. As of December 31, 2015, we had $73.1 million of outstanding letters of credit, $994.0 million drawn under the revolving credit facility and $933.0 million outstanding under the term loan facility, with total undrawn capacity of $532.9 million under the 2012 credit facility.

We, SL Green and the Operating Partnership are all borrowers jointly and severally obligated under the 2012 credit facility. None of SL Green's other subsidiaries are obligors under the 2012 credit facility.

The 2012 credit facility includes certain restrictions and covenants (see Restrictive Covenants below).

Master Repurchase Agreement

~~The~~In ~~Master~~July ~~Repurchase Agreement~~2016, aswe ~~amended~~entered ininto ~~December~~a ~~2013~~restated Master Repurchase Agreement, or MRA, which provides us with the ability to sell certain debt investments with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the same at a certain date or on demand. ~~This~~The MRA has a maximum facility capacity of $300.0 million and bears interest ranging from 225 ~~250~~ and ~~325~~ 400 basis points over 30-day LIBOR depending on the pledged collateral. ~~In September~~Since ~~2015 we entered into an amendment to the MRA to extend the maturity to June 29, 2016. Further, as of~~ December 6, 2015, we ~~are~~have ~~now~~been required to pay monthly in arrears a 25 basis point fee on the excess of $150.0 million over the average daily balance during the period if the average daily balance is less than $150.0 million. We seek to mitigate risks associated with our repurchase agreement by managing the credit quality of our assets, early repayments, interest rate volatility, liquidity, and market value. The margin call provisions under our repurchase facility permit valuation adjustments based on capital markets activity, and are not limited to collateral-specific credit marks. To monitor credit risk associated with our debt investments, our asset management team regularly reviews our investment portfolio and is in contact with our borrowers in order to monitor the collateral and enforce our rights as necessary. The risk associated with potential margin calls is further mitigated by our ability to recollateralize the facility with additional assets from our portfolio of debt investments, our ability to satisfy margin calls with cash or cash equivalents and our access to additional liquidity through the 2012 ~~Credit~~credit ~~Facility~~facility, as defined above.

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the gross book value of the properties and debt and preferred equity investments collateralizing the mortgages and other loans payable, not including assets held for sale, was approximately $1.7 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively.

Senior Unsecured Notes

The following table sets forth our senior unsecured notes and other related disclosures as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively, by scheduled maturity date (dollars in thousands):

Issuance	December 31, ~~2015Unpaid~~2016Unpaid Principal Balance		December 31, ~~2015Accreted~~2016Accreted Balance			December 31, ~~2014Accreted~~2015Accreted Balance			CouponRate (1)		EffectiveRate		Term(in Years)	Maturity Date
March 31, 2006(2)	$	255,308	$	255,296		$	255,250		6.00	%	6.00	%	10	March 31, 2016
August 5, 2011 (2)	$	250,000	$	249,880		$	249,810		5.00	%	5.00	%	7	August 2018
August 5, 2011(3)	250,000		249,810			249,744			5.00	%	5.00	%	7	August 15, 2018
March 16, 2010 (2)	250,000		250,000			250,000			7.75	%	7.75	%	10	March 2020
March 16, 2010(3)	250,000		250,000			250,000			7.75	%	7.75	%	10	March 15, 2020
November 15, 2012 (2)	200,000		200,000			200,000			4.50	%	4.50	%	10	December 2022
November 15, 2012(3)	200,000		200,000			200,000			4.50	%	4.50	%	10	December 1, 2022
December 17, 2015 (2)	100,000		100,000			100,000			4.27	%	4.27	%	10	December 2025
December 15, 2015(3)	100,000		100,000			—			4.27	%	4.27	%	10	December 17, 2025
March 31, 2006 (3)	—		—			255,296
June 27, 2005(4)	—		—			7
	$	800,000	$	799,880		$	1,055,106
	$	1,055,308	$	1,055,106		$	955,001
Deferred financing costs, net			(4,620		)	(5,303		)
	$	800,000	$	795,260		$	1,049,803

______________________________________________________________________


(1)	Interest on the senior unsecured notes is payable semi-annually with principal and unpaid interest due on the scheduled maturity dates.

(2) ~~The~~Issued ~~notes~~by ~~will~~SL beGreen, ~~repaid~~the atOperating ~~maturity~~Partnership and ROP, as co-obligors.

(3) ~~Issued~~This bynote SLwas ~~Green,~~repaid ~~the~~in ~~Operating~~March ~~Partnership and ROP, as co-obligors~~2016.

(4) In April 2015, we redeemed the remaining outstanding debentures.

ROP also provides a guaranty of the Operating Partnership's obligations under its 3.00% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2017.

Table of Contents

Restrictive Covenants

The terms of the 2012 credit facility, as amended, and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit, among other things, SL Green's ability to pay dividends, make certain types of investments, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets, and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value, a minimum ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value. The dividend restriction referred to above provides that SL Green will not during any time when a default is continuing, make distributions with respect to SL Green's common stock or other equity interests, except to enable SL Green to continue to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our variable rate debt. Our exposure to interest rate ~~changes~~fluctuations are managed through either the use of interest rate derivative instruments and/or through our variable rate debt and preferred equity investments. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for ~~2015~~2016 would ~~increase~~decrease our annual interest cost, net of interest income from variable rate debt and preferred equity investments, by approximately $107.01 million. At December 31, 2016, 78.0% of our $1.6 billion debt and preferred equity portfolio is indexed to LIBOR.

We recognize most derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through income. If a derivative is considered a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset, liability, or firm commitment through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

WeOur ~~have $1.6 billion of~~ long -term debt ~~that~~of $2.1 billion bears interest at fixed rates, and therefore the fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in the market interest rates. Our variable rate debt as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 bore interest based on a spread of LIBOR plus ~~125~~140 basis points to LIBOR plus ~~315~~294 basis points.

Contractual Obligations

The combined aggregate principal maturities of ~~mortgage~~mortgages ~~note~~ and other loans payable, the 2012 credit facility and senior unsecured notes (net of discount), including as-of-right extension options, and put options, estimated interest expense, and our obligations under our ~~and~~ ground leases, as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 are as follows (in thousands):

	2016		2017		2018		2019		2020		Thereafter		Total
	2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		Thereafter		Total
Property mortgage and other loans payable	$	256,990	$	7,411	$	7,799	$	8,207	$	8,637	$	464,380	$	753,424
Property mortgages and other loans payable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	500,000	$	500,000
Revolving credit facility	—		—		—		—		994,000		—		994,000
Master repurchase agreement	—		184,642		—		—		—		—		184,642
Unsecured term loan	—		—		—		933,000		—		—		933,000
Revolving credit facility	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Senior unsecured notes	255,308		—		250,000		—		250,000		300,000		1,055,308
Unsecured term loan	—		—		1,183,000		—		—		—		1,183,000
Ground leases	20,440		20,586		20,586		20,586		20,586		328,088		430,872
Senior unsecured notes	—		250,000		—		250,000		—		300,000		800,000
Estimated interest expense	114,845		109,385		108,683		93,804		47,618		94,420		568,755
Ground leases	20,586		20,586		20,586		20,586		20,736		308,202		411,282
Total	$	647,583	$	137,382	$	387,068	$	1,055,597	$	1,320,841	$	1,186,888	$	4,735,359
Estimated interest expense	106,253		104,286		75,105		42,833		38,850		61,402		428,729
Total	$	126,839	$	559,514	$	1,278,691	$	313,419	$	59,586	$	1,169,604	$	3,507,653

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have off-balance sheet investments, including debt and preferred equity investments. These investments all have varying ownership structures. Our off-balance sheet arrangements are discussed in Note 5, "Debt, and Preferred Equity ~~and Other~~ Investments," in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Capital Expenditures

We estimate that for the year ending December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we expect to incur $~~105~~40.09 million of recurring capital expenditures and $27127.96 million of development or redevelopment expenditures, net of loan reserves, (including tenant improvements and leasing commissions) on existing consolidated properties. Future property acquisitions may require substantial capital investments for refurbishment and leasing costs. We expect to fund these capital expenditures with operating cash flow, existing liquidity, or incremental borrowings. We expect our capital needs over the next twelve months and thereafter will be met through a combination of cash on hand, net cash provided by operations, borrowings, potential asset sales or additional debt issuances.

Table of Contents

Related Party Transactions

Cleaning/ Security/ Messenger and Restoration Services

~~Through~~ Alliance Building Services, or Alliance, ~~First~~and ~~Quality~~its ~~Maintenance,~~affiliates ~~L.P.,~~are orpartially ~~First~~owned ~~Quality,~~by ~~provides~~Gary ~~cleaning~~Green, ~~extermination~~a ~~and~~son ~~related~~of ~~services,~~Stephen ~~Classic~~L. ~~Security LLC provides security services~~Green, ~~Bright~~the ~~Star~~chairman ~~Couriers~~of ~~LLC~~SL ~~provides~~Green's ~~messenger~~board ~~services~~of directors, and ~~Onyx~~provide ~~Restoration Works provides restoration~~ services ~~with respect~~ to certain properties owned by us. Alliance’s isaffiliates ~~partially~~include ~~owned~~First byQuality ~~Gary~~Maintenance, L.P., ~~Green~~or First Quality, aClassic ~~son~~Security LLC, ofBright ~~Stephen~~Star L.Couriers LLC ~~Green~~and Onyx Restoration Works, ~~the~~and ~~chairman~~provide ofcleaning, SLextermination, ~~Green's~~security, ~~board~~messenger, ofand ~~directors~~restoration services, respectively. In addition, First Quality has the non-exclusive opportunity to provide cleaning and related services to individual tenants at our properties on a basis separately negotiated with any tenant seeking such additional services. AnThe ~~affiliate~~Service ofCorporation ~~ours~~ has entered into an arrangement with Alliance whereby it will receive a profit participation above a certain threshold for services provided by Alliance to certain tenants at certain buildings above the base services specified in their lease agreements. Income earned from profit participation, which is included in other income on the consolidated statements of operations, was $3.3 million, $3.3 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively. We also recorded expenses of $9.9 million, $9.1 million and $9.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively, for these services (excluding services provided directly to tenants).

Income earned from profit participation, which is included in other income on the consolidated statements of operations, was $3.3 million, $3.3 million and $3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively. We also recorded expenses, inclusive of capitalized expenses, of $8.1 million, $9.9 million and $9.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively, for these services (excluding services provided directly to tenants).

Allocated Expenses from SL Green

Property operating expenses include an allocation of salary and other operating costs from SL Green based on square footage of the related properties. Such amount was approximately $1011.45 million, $910.84 million and $9.18 million for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

Insurance

ROP is insured through a program administered by SL Green. SL Green maintains “all-risk” property and rental value coverage (including coverage regarding the perils of flood, earthquake and terrorism), ~~within~~excluding ~~three~~nuclear, ~~property~~biological, ~~insurance~~chemical, ~~portfolios~~ and ~~liability~~radiological ~~insurance.~~terrorism ~~This~~("NBCR")), ~~includes~~within ~~ROP~~three ~~assets. The first~~ property ~~portfolio~~insurance ~~maintains~~programs aand ~~blanket~~liability ~~limit of $950~~insurance.0 ~~million~~Management ~~per~~believes ~~occurrence, including terrorism, for~~ the ~~majority~~policy ofspecifications ~~the New York City properties in our portfolio~~ and ~~expires~~insured ~~December~~limits ~~31,~~are ~~2017.~~appropriate ~~The~~given ~~second~~the ~~portfolio~~relative ~~maintains~~risk ~~a limit~~ of ~~$1.5 billion per occurrence~~loss, ~~including terrorism, for several New York City properties and~~ the ~~majority~~cost of the ~~Suburban properties and expires December 31, 2017. Each of these policies includes $100.0 million of flood~~ coverage, ~~with~~and aindustry ~~lower sublimit for locations in high hazard flood zones~~practice. ASeparate ~~third blanket~~ property ~~policy covers most of SL Green's residential assets~~ and ~~maintains a limit of $386.0 million per occurrence, including terrorism, for our residential properties and expires January 31, 2018. SL Green maintains two~~ liability policies which cover all our properties and provide limits of $201.0 million per occurrence and in the aggregate per location. The liability policies expire on October 31, 2016 and January 31, 2017 and cover SL Green's commercial and residential assets, respectively. Additional coverage may be purchased on a stand-alone basis for certain assets.

On January 12, 2015, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization and Extension Act of 2007 ("TRIPRA") (formerly the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act) was reauthorized until December 31, 2020 pursuant to the Terrorism Insurance Program Reauthorization and Extension Act of 2015. The TRIPRA extends the federal Terrorism Insurance Program that requires insurance companies to offer terrorism coverage and provides for compensation for insured losses resulting from acts of certified terrorism, subject to the current program trigger of $120.0 million, which will increase by $20.0 million per annum, commencing December 31, 2015 (Trigger). Coinsurance under TRIPRA is 16%, increasing 1% per annum, as of December 31, 2015 (Coinsurance). There are no assurances TRIPRA will be further extended.

In October 2006, SL Green formed a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, Belmont Insurance Company, or Belmont, to act as a captive insurance company and as one of the elements of our overall insurance program. Belmont is a subsidiary of SL Green. Belmont was formed in an effort to, among other reasons, stabilize to some extent the fluctuations of insurance market conditions. Belmont is licensed in New York to write Terrorism, NBCR (nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiological), General Liability, Environmental Liability and D&O coverage.

The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, or TRIA, which was enacted in November 2002, was renewed December 31, 2005 and again on December 31, 2007. Congress extended TRIA, now called TRIPRA (Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization and Extension Act of 2007) until December 31, 2014. TRIPRA was not renewed by Congress and expired on December 31, 2014. However, on January 12, 2015, TRIPRA was reauthorized until December 31, 2020 (Terrorism Insurance Program Reauthorization and Extension Act of 2015).The law extends the federal Terrorism Insurance Program that requires insurance companies to offer terrorism coverage and provides for compensation for insured losses resulting from acts of certified terrorism, subject to the current program trigger of $100.0 million, which will increase by $20 million per annum, commencing December 31, 2015. Our debt instruments, consisting of mortgage loans secured by our properties (which are generally non-recourse to us), mezzanine loans, ground leases, our 2012 credit facility, senior unsecured notes and other corporate obligations, contain customary covenants requiring us to maintain insurance. Although we believe that we currently maintain sufficient insurance coverage to satisfy these obligations, there is no assurance that in the future we will be able to procure coverage at a reasonable cost. In such instances, there can be no assurance that the lenders or ground lessors under these instruments will not take the position that a total or partial exclusion from “all-risk” insurance coverage for losses due to, for example, terrorist acts is a breach of these debt and ground lease instruments allowing the lenders or ground lessors to declare an event of default and accelerate repayment of debt or recapture of ground lease positions. In addition, if lenders ~~prevail~~require ingreater ~~asserting~~coverage that we are ~~required~~unable to ~~maintain~~obtain ~~full~~at ~~coverage~~commercially ~~for~~reasonable ~~these risks~~rates, itwe ~~could~~may ~~result~~incur in substantially higher insurance premiums or our ability to finance our properties and expand our portfolio may be adversely impacted.

WeFurthermore, ~~monitor~~with ~~all~~respect to certain of our properties, ~~that~~including ~~are~~properties held by joint ventures, or subject to triple net leases, toinsurance ~~ensure~~coverage ~~that~~is ~~tenants~~obtained ~~are~~by ~~providing~~a ~~adequate~~third-party and we do not control the coverage. ~~Certain~~ ~~joint~~While ~~ventures~~we may behave ~~covered~~agreements ~~under~~with ~~policies~~such ~~separate~~third ~~from~~parties ~~our~~to maintain adequate coverage and we monitor these policies, atsuch coverage ~~limits~~ultimately ~~which~~may not be maintained or adequately cover our risk of loss. We may have less protection than with respect to the properties where we ~~deem~~obtain coverage directly. Although we consider our insurance coverage to be ~~adequate. We~~appropriate, in the event of a major catastrophe, we may not have sufficient coverage to replace certain properties.

Table of Contents

~~continually~~We ~~monitor~~obtain ~~these~~insurance ~~policies. Although~~coverage wethrough ~~consider~~an ~~our~~ insurance ~~coverage~~program toadministered beby ~~appropriate~~SL Green. In connection with this program, inwe ~~the~~incurred ~~event~~insurance expense of aapproximately ~~major~~$5.9 ~~catastrophe~~million, we$6.6 ~~may~~million ~~not~~and ~~have~~$6.4 ~~sufficient~~million ~~coverage~~for tothe ~~replace~~years ~~certain~~ended ~~properties~~December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively.

We obtained insurance coverage through an insurance program administered by SL Green. In connection with this program, we incurred insurance expense of approximately $6.6 million, $6.4 million and $6.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively.

Related Party Receivable from SL Green

On July 22, 2015, our parent company issued a promissory note to us in the amount of $90.0 million , which ~~bears~~bore interest at an annual rate of 6.0% , compounded quarterly, and ~~matures~~matured on July 22, 2017. The promissory note was settled in August 2016.

Inflation

Substantially all of our office leases provide for separate real estate tax and operating expense escalations as well as operating expense recoveries based on increases in the Consumer Price Index or other measures such as porters' wage. In addition, many of the leases provide for fixed base rent increases. We believe that inflationary increases will be at least partially offset by the contractual rent increases and expense escalations described above.

Accounting Standards Updates

The Accounting Standards Updates are discussed in Note 2, "Significant Accounting Policies - Accounting Standards Updates" in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Forward-Looking Information

This report includes certain statements that may be deemed to be "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions thereof. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such matters as future capital expenditures, dividends and acquisitions (including the amount and nature thereof), development trends of the real estate industry and the Manhattan, Brooklyn, Westchester County, Connecticut, Long Island and New Jersey office markets, business strategies, expansion and growth of our operations and other similar matters, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially, and we caution you not to place undue reliance on such statements. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by the use of the words "may," "will," "should," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "believe," "intend," "project," "continue," or the negative of these words, or other similar words or terms.

Forward-looking statements contained in this report are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by forward-looking statements made by us. These risks and uncertainties include:


•	the effect of general economic, business and financial conditions, and their effect on the New York City real estate market in particular;


•	dependence upon certain geographic markets;


•	risks of real estate acquisitions, dispositions, developments and redevelopment, including the cost of construction delays and cost overruns;


•	risks relating to debt and preferred equity investments;


•	availability and creditworthiness of prospective tenants and borrowers;


•	bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or a significant number of smaller tenants;


•	adverse changes in the real estate markets, including reduced demand for office space, increasing vacancy, and increasing availability of sublease space;


•	availability of capital (debt and equity);


•	unanticipated increases in financing and other costs, including a rise in interest rates;

• ~~the~~our ~~Company's~~ ability to comply with financial covenants in our debt instruments;

• SLour ~~Green's~~ ability to maintain its status as a REIT;


•	risks of investing through joint venture structures, including the fulfillment by our partners of their financial obligations;

• the threat of terrorist attacks;

Table of Contents


•	the threat of terrorist attacks;


•	our ability to obtain adequate insurance coverage at a reasonable cost and the potential for losses in excess of our insurance coverage, including as a result of environmental contamination; and,

• legislative, regulatory and/or safety requirements adversely affecting REITs and the real estate business, including costs of compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Housing Act and other similar laws and regulations.

Other factors and risks to our business, many of which are beyond our control, are described in other sections of this report and in our other filings with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise.

The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect ROP's business and financial performance. In addition, sections of SL Green and the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 contain additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, ROP operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on ROP's business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

Table of Contents

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

See Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Market Rate Risk," for additional information regarding our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

The table below presents the principal cash flows based upon maturity dates of our debt obligations and debt and preferred equity investments and the weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity ~~date~~dates, including as-of-right extension options ~~and put options~~, as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (~~amounts~~ in thousands):

	Long-Term Debt								Debt and Preferred Equity Investments (1)(2)
Date	FixedRate		AverageInterestRate		VariableRate		AverageInterestRate		Amount		WeightedYield
2016	$	258,874	5.41	%	$	253,424	1.92	%	$	591,164	11.17	%
2017	$	—	4.30	%	$	—	2.74	%	$	603,152	9.57	%
2017	7,411		5.37		—		2.00		631,071		9.73
2018	250,000		4.41		184,642		3.17		482,446		9.39
2018	257,799		5.40		—		2.22		327,334		9.96
2019	800,000		4.85		383,000		3.27		305,498		9.10
2019	38,207		5.51		903,000		2.49		67,015		7.45
2020	250,000		5.03		—		—		159,593		8.72
2020	258,637		5.03		994,000		2.64		—		—
2021	—		4.86		—		—		43,648		7.94
Thereafter	~~764~~800,~~380~~000		4.8277		—		—		5346,~~436~~075		89.7910
Total	$	12,~~585~~100,~~308~~000	54.2359	%	$	2567,~~150,424~~642	2.1599	%	$	1,~~670~~640,~~020~~412	109.5131	%
Fair Value	$	12,~~663~~183,~~078~~042			$	2580,~~164,673~~083

______________________________________________________________________

(1) Excludes one investment with a book value of $~~100~~174.21 million and $100.02 million as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively, which we accounted for under the equity method accounting as a result of meeting the criteria of a real estate investment under the guidance for Acquisition, Development and Construction arrangements, and other investments with a book value of $~~168~~144.35 million and $~~107~~168.03 million as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

(2) At December 31, ~~2015~~2016, debt and preferred equity investments had an estimated fair value ranging between $1.76 billion and $1.8 billion.

The table below lists our derivative instrument, which is a hedge in respect of variable rate debt, and its related fair value as of December 31, 2015 (amounts in thousands):

Asset Hedged

BenchmarkRate

NotionalValue

StrikeRate

EffectiveDate

ExpirationDate

Fair Value

Interest Rate Swap

Credit facility

LIBOR

30,000,000

2.295%

July 2010

June 2016

(241,000)

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Financial Statements and Schedules

RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		39
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014		39
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015		40
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013		40
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		42
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013		41
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		43
Consolidated Statements of Capital for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013		42
Consolidated Statements of Capital for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		44
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013		43
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		45
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		4446
Schedules
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013		70
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014		74
Schedule III-Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2015		71
Schedule III-Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2016		75

All other schedules are omitted because they are not required or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners of Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. (the "Company") as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, ~~present~~presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1, the consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the 2015 transfers of two properties, a tenancy in common interest in a fee interest and one entity that held debt investments and financing receivables to the Company from the Company's parent, SL Green Realty Corp.



		/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York

March 2210, ~~2016~~2017

Table of Contents

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands)

	December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
				(as adjusted)
Assets
Commercial real estate properties, at cost:
Land and land interests	$	1,~~877~~805,~~492~~198		$	1,~~776~~877,~~457~~492
Building and improvements	4,~~477~~629,~~073~~994			4,~~353~~477,~~081~~073
Building leasehold and improvements	1,073,678			1,073,678
	7,428,243			7,203,216
	7,508,870			7,428,243
Less: accumulated depreciation	(1,~~267~~437,~~598~~222		)	(1,~~123~~267,~~412~~598		)
	6,160,645			6,079,804
	6,071,648			6,160,645
Cash and cash equivalents	5059,~~026~~930			3450,~~691~~026
Restricted cash	3943,~~433~~489			3839,~~844~~433
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance of $5,593 and $5,820 in 2015 and 2014, respectively	35,256			25,778
Tenant and other receivables, net of allowance of $4,879 and $5,593 in 2016 and 2015, respectively	30,999			35,256
Deferred rents receivable, net of allowance of $14,788 and $17,745 in 2015 and 2014, respectively	217,730			199,045
Deferred rents receivable, net of allowance of $17,798 and $14,788 in 2016 and 2015, respectively	238,447			217,730
Related party receivable	~~90,000~~—			—90,000
Debt, preferred equity and other investments, net of discounts and deferred origination fees of $18,759 and $19,172 in 2015 and 2014, respectively	1,770,212			1,508,812
Debt, preferred equity and other investments, net of discounts and deferred origination fees of $16,705 and $18,759 in 2016 and 2015, respectively	1,640,412			1,670,020
Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization of $90,168 and $77,594 in 2015 and 2014, respectively	139,638			123,914
Investments in joint ventures	174,127			100,192
Other assets	355,807			292,885
Deferred costs, net of accumulated amortization of $73,673 and $64,812 in 2016 and 2015, respectively	121,470			114,449
Total assets	$	8,858,747		$	8,303,773
Other assets	374,091			355,566
Total assets	$	8,754,613		$	8,833,317
Liabilities
Mortgages and other loans payable	$	753,424		$	720,000
Mortgages and other loans payable, net	$	676,068		$	745,728
Revolving credit facility	994,000			385,000
Revolving credit facility, net	—			985,055
Term loan and senior unsecured notes	1,988,106			1,788,001
Unsecured term loan, net	1,179,521			929,514
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities	134,484			92,815
Unsecured notes, net	795,260			1,049,803
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	70,844			69,805
Accrued interest payable	15,781			18,396
Deferred revenue	180,404			130,661
Other liabilities	160,982			116,088
Deferred land leases payable	1,558			1,215
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	60,855			70,844
Dividends payable	807			—
Related party payables	23,808			—
Security deposits	39,007			36,195
Deferred revenue	161,772			180,404
Total liabilities	4,162,634			3,223,692
Deferred land leases payable	1,795			1,558
Dividends payable	754			807
Security deposits	40,033			39,007
Total liabilities	3,116,629			4,137,204
Commitments and contingencies	—			—
Preferred units	109,161			—109,161
Capital
General partner capital	45,~~201~~139,~~872~~842			4,~~734~~201,~~873~~872
Limited partner capital	—			—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(21,~~216~~618		)	(32,~~106~~216		)
Total ROP partner's capital	45,~~199~~138,~~656~~224			4,~~731~~199,~~767~~656
Noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	~~387~~390,~~296~~599			~~348~~387,~~314~~296
Total capital	45,~~586~~528,~~952~~823			54,~~080~~586,~~081~~952
Total liabilities and capital	$	8,~~858~~754,~~747~~613		$	8,~~303~~833,~~773~~317

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
	2016			2015			2014
				(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)
Revenues
Rental revenue, net	$	~~621~~652,~~121~~629		$	~~574~~621,~~150~~121		$	~~535~~574,~~969~~150
Escalation and reimbursement	95104,~~894~~683			9295,~~850~~894			8692,~~366~~850
Investment income	~~182~~214,~~648~~102			~~176~~182,~~901~~648			~~194~~176,~~612~~901
Other income	254,~~570~~002			325,~~621~~570			43,~~875~~621
Total revenues	~~925~~975,~~233~~416			~~847~~925,~~522~~233			~~821~~847,~~822~~522
Expenses
Operating expenses, including $26,728 in 2015, $25,094 in 2014, and $24,302 in 2013 of related party expenses	163,969			154,374			146,548
Operating expenses, including $25,193 in 2016, $26,728 in 2015, and $25,094 in 2014 of related party expenses	166,137			163,969			154,374
Real estate taxes	~~143~~152,~~873~~010			~~133~~143,~~567~~873			~~118~~133,~~699~~567
Ground rent	20,~~941~~971			20,941			2120,~~139~~941
Interest expense, net of interest income	~~119~~109,~~342~~208			~~129~~119,~~356~~342			~~133~~129,~~845~~356
Amortization of deferred financing costs	7,~~519~~918			7,~~810~~519			87,~~460~~810
Depreciation and amortization	~~202~~212,~~474~~514			~~196~~202,~~505~~474			~~181~~196,~~619~~505
Transaction related costs	~~2,871~~238			32,~~599~~871			3,~~070~~599
Marketing, general and administrative	~~464~~720			~~372~~464			~~362~~372
Total expenses	~~661~~669,~~453~~716			~~646~~661,~~524~~453			~~613~~646,~~742~~524
Income from continuing operations before equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures, equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture, gain on sale of real estate, depreciable real estate reserves and loss on early extinguishment of debt	263,780			200,998			208,080
Income from continuing operations before equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures, equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture, (loss) gain on sale of real estate, depreciable real estate reserves and loss on early extinguishment of debt	305,700			263,780			200,998
Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures	8,841			4,491			(17,108		)
Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures	14,509			8,841			4,491
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture	—			~~85,559~~—			285,~~056~~559
Gain on sale of real estate	100,190			—			—
(Loss) gain on sale of real estate	(6,909		)	100,190			—
Depreciable real estate reserves	~~(9,998~~—		)	—(9,998		)	—
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	~~(49~~—		)	(~~7,385~~49		)	(767,385		)
Income from continuing operations	~~362~~313,~~764~~300			~~283~~362,~~663~~764			~~192~~283,~~952~~663
Net income from discontinued operations	—			~~1,996~~—			51,~~907~~996
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	—			~~117,579~~—			13117,~~756~~579
Net income	~~362~~313,~~764~~300			~~403~~362,~~238~~764			~~212~~403,~~615~~238
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	(94,~~169~~424		)	(29,~~641~~169		)	(52,~~200~~641		)
Preferred units dividend	(13,~~698~~821		)	—(1,698		)	—
Net income attributable to ROP common unitholder	$	~~351~~305,~~897~~055		$	~~400~~351,~~597~~897		$	~~207~~400,~~415~~597
Amounts attributable to ROP common unitholder:
Income from continuing operations	$	~~351~~305,~~897~~055		$	~~281~~351,~~022~~897		$	~~187~~281,~~752~~022
Discontinued operations	—			~~119,575~~—			19119,~~663~~575
Net income attributable to ROP common unitholder	$	~~351~~305,~~897~~055		$	~~400~~351,~~597~~897		$	~~207~~400,~~415~~597

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4142

Table of Contents

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2015		2014		2013
	2016		2015		2014
			(as adjusted)		(as adjusted)
Net income attributable to ROP common unitholder	$	305,055	$	351,897	$	400,597
Net income attributable to ROP common unitholder	$	351,897	$	400,597	$	207,415
Other comprehensive income:
Change in net unrealized gain on derivative instruments	~~890~~598		~~835~~890		~~914~~835
Comprehensive income attributable to ROP common unitholder	$	~~352~~305,~~787~~653	$	~~401~~352,~~432~~787	$	~~208~~401,~~329~~432

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4243

Table of Contents

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Capital

(in thousands)

	GeneralPartner'sCapitalClass ACommonUnits			Limited Partner's Capital		NoncontrollingInterestsIn OtherPartnerships			AccumulatedOtherComprehensive(Loss) Income			TotalCapital
Balance at December 31, 2012, as adjusted	$	4,127,414		$	—	$	357,667		$	(4,855	)	$	4,480,226
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	4,248,736		$	—	$	350,779		$	(3,941	)	$	4,595,574
Contributions	3,067,104			—		—			—			3,067,104
Distributions	(3,153,197		)	—		(12,088		)	—			(3,165,285		)
Net income	207,415			—		5,200			—			212,615
Other comprehensive income	—			—		—			914			914
Balance at December 31, 2013, as adjusted	4,248,736			—		350,779			(3,941		)	4,595,574
Contributions	3,697,440			—		93			—			3,697,533
Distributions	(3,611,900		)	—		(5,199		)	—			(3,617,099		)
Net income	400,597			—		2,641			—			403,238
Other comprehensive income	—			—		—			835			835
Balance at December 31, 2014, as adjusted	4,734,873			—		348,314			(3,106		)	5,080,081
Balance at December 31, 2014	4,734,873			—		348,314			(3,106		)	5,080,081
Contributions	3,315,582			—		31,678			—			3,347,260
Distributions	(4,190,480		)	—		(1,865		)	—			(4,192,345		)
Shares contributed by parent company	(10,000		)	—		—			—			(10,000		)
Net income	351,897			—		9,169			—			361,066
Other comprehensive income	—			—		—			890			890
Balance at December 31, 2015	$4,201,872	~~4,201,872~~		$—	—	$387,296	~~387,296~~		$(2,216	~~(2,216~~	)	$4,586,952	~~4,586,952~~
Contributions	4,490,682											4,490,682
Distributions	(3,857,767		)			(1,121		)				(3,858,888		)
Net income	305,055					4,424						309,479
Other comprehensive income	—								598			598
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	5,139,842		$	—	$	390,599		$	(1,618	)	$	5,528,823

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4344

Table of Contents

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
	2016			2015			2014
				(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)
Operating Activities
Net income	$	~~362~~313,~~764~~300		$	~~403~~362,~~238~~764		$	~~212~~403,~~615~~238
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	~~209~~220,~~993~~432			~~204~~209,~~748~~993			~~194~~204,~~905~~748
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture	—			(85,559		)	(2,056		)
Equity in net gain on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/real estate	—			—			(85,559		)
Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint venture	(8,841		)	(4,491		)	17,108
Equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures	(14,509		)	(8,841		)	(4,491		)
Distributions of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures	810,~~621~~430			68,~~269~~621			36,~~942~~269
Loss on early extinguishment of debt	49—			~~7,385~~49			767,385
Depreciable real estate reserve	~~9,998~~—			—9,998			—
Gain on sale of real estate	(100,190		)	—			—
Loss (gain) on sale of real estate, net	6,909			(100,190		)	—
Gain on sale of discontinued operations	—			~~(117,579~~—		)	(13117,~~756~~579		)
Deferred rents receivable	(2123,~~378~~768		)	(2321,~~515~~378		)	(2223,~~094~~515		)
Other non-cash adjustments	(6446,~~329~~449		)	(8764,~~271~~329		)	(~~103~~87,~~179~~271		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash—operations	(111,~~182~~585		)	(41,~~986~~182		)	(64,~~892~~986		)
Tenant and other receivables	(91,~~900~~511		)	(19,~~238~~900		)	4(1,~~545~~238		)
Deferred lease costs	(3827,~~623~~625		)	(2138,~~103~~623		)	(2621,~~263~~103		)
Other assets	1412,~~558~~872			1014,~~710~~558			~~(330~~10,710		)
Related party payable	—			—			(8,717		)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, other liabilities, and security deposits	(2,937		)	2,458			(4,866		)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	2,458			(4,866		)	(113		)
Deferred revenue and land leases payable	1,684			1,487			1,653
Deferred revenue and land leases payable	1,487			1,653			4,624
Net cash provided by operating activities	440,265			365,485			283,395
Net cash provided by operating activities	365,485			283,395			254,415
Investing Activities
Acquisitions of real estate property	~~(109,633~~—		)	(~~517~~109,~~535~~633		)	(~~386~~517,~~775~~535		)
Additions to land, buildings and improvements	(89127,~~998~~200		)	(~~102~~89,~~905~~998		)	(97102,~~918~~905		)
Escrowed cash—capital improvements/acquisition deposits	~~593~~772			~~657~~593			~~(193~~657		)
Investments in unconsolidated joint venture	(~~988~~25,373		)	(~~59,400~~988		)	(1359,~~179~~400		)
Distributions in excess of cumulative earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures	281,~~459~~304			—28,459			~~19,926~~—
Net proceeds from disposition of real estate/joint venture interest	~~238~~42,~~083~~316			~~237~~238,~~059~~083			~~211~~237,~~048~~059
Other investments	~~(54~~14,~~475~~292		)	(1654,~~300~~475		)	(8616,~~145~~300		)
Origination of debt and preferred equity investments	(~~758~~977,~~133~~699		)	(~~617~~758,~~090~~133		)	(~~555~~617,~~137~~090		)
Repayments or redemption of preferred equity investments	~~520~~904,~~218~~517			~~576~~520,~~927~~218			~~657~~576,~~765~~927
Net cash used in investing activities	(~~225~~167,~~874~~071		)	(~~498~~225,~~587~~874		)	(~~250~~498,~~608~~587		)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from mortgages and other loans payable	~~360~~50,~~018~~383			~~221~~360,~~216~~018			60221,~~172~~216
Repayments of mortgages and other loans payable	(~~326~~119,~~594~~165		)	(~~608~~326,~~539~~594		)	(95608,~~950~~539		)
Proceeds from credit facility and senior unsecured notes	2,515,000			1,908,000			1,163,938
Proceeds from revolving credit facility, term loan and senior unsecured notes	1,325,300			2,515,000			1,908,000
Repayments of credit facility and senior unsecured notes	(1,706,007		)	(1,385,898		)	(1,014,000		)
Repayments of revolving credit facility term loan and senior unsecured notes	(2,324,608		)	(1,706,007		)	(1,385,898		)
Payments of debt extinguishment costs	—			~~(6,693~~—		)	—(6,693		)
Contributions from common unitholder	34,~~201~~490,~~654~~682			3,~~693~~201,~~440~~654			3,~~059~~693,~~766~~440
Contributions to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	9,400			93			—
Contributions from noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	—			9,400			93
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in other partnerships	(1,~~865~~121		)	(51,~~199~~865		)	(125,~~088~~199		)
Distributions to common and preferred unitholder	(43,~~191~~738,~~371~~853		)	(34,~~611~~191,~~900~~371		)	(3,~~153~~611,~~197~~900		)
Deferred loan costs and capitalized lease obligation	(95,~~511~~058		)	(39,~~681~~511		)	(~~609~~3,681		)
Other obligation related to mortgage loan participation	2559,~~000~~150			—25,000			—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(~~124~~263,~~276~~290		)	~~200~~(124,~~839~~276		)	8200,~~032~~839
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	159,~~335~~904			~~(14~~15,~~353~~335		)	11(14,~~839~~353		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	3450,~~691~~026			4934,~~044~~691			3749,~~205~~044
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	5059,~~026~~930		$	3450,~~691~~026		$	4934,~~044~~691
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosure
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosure:
Interest paid	$	~~118~~110,~~090~~656		$	~~138~~118,~~574~~090		$	~~139~~138,~~216~~574
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Tenant improvements and capital expenditures payable	$	34,~~441~~029		$	~~375~~3,441		$	~~1,479~~375
Deferred leasing payable	74,~~752~~072			117,~~127~~752			211,~~655~~127
Capital leased asset	—			—			10,657
Change in fair value of hedge	206			570			519
Change in fair value of hedge	570			519			588
Contributions from common unitholder	—			13,928			4,000
Contributions from common unitholder	13,928			4,000			7,338
Distribution of land to common unitholder	8,980			—			—
Deconsolidation of a subsidiary	~~27,435~~—			—27,435			—
Issuance of SL Green common stock to a consolidated joint venture	~~10,000~~—			—10,000			—
Contribution of notes receivable from the common unit holder	~~90,000~~—			—90,000			—
Issuance of preferred units through a subsidiary	~~109,161~~—			—109,161			—
Contributions from a noncontrolling interest in other partnerships	~~22,278~~—			—22,278			—
Transfer of financing receivable to debt investment	—			~~19,675~~—			—19,675
Exchange of debt investment for equity in joint venture	68,581			—			—
Removal of fully depreciated commercial real estate properties	12,326			—			—
Settlement of related party receivable with SL Green common stock	90,000			—			—
Issuance of related party payable for SL Green common stock	23,808			—			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4445

Table of Contents

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P., or ROP, commenced operations on June 2, 1995. The sole general partner of ROP is Wyoming Acquisition GP LLC., or WAGP, a wholly-owned subsidiary of SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P., or the Operating Partnership. The sole limited partner of ROP is the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership is 9695.3984% owned by SL Green Realty Corp., or SL Green, as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016. SL Green is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, and is the sole managing general partner of the Operating Partnership. Unless the context requires otherwise, all references to "we," "our," "us" and the "Company" means ROP and all entities owned or controlled by ROP.

SL Green, and the Operating Partnership were formed in June 1997. SL Green has qualified, and expects to qualify in the current fiscal year as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and operates as a self-administered, self-managed REIT. A REIT is a legal entity that holds real estate interests and, through payments of dividends to stockholders, is permitted to minimize the payment of Federal income taxes at the corporate level.

In 2015, SL Green transferred two properties and SL Green's tenancy in common interest in a fee interest with a total value of $395.0 million to ROP. Additionally, in 2015, SL Green transferred one entity that held debt investments and financing receivables with an aggregate carrying value of $1.7 billion to ROP. During 2014, SL Green transferred five properties with a total value aggregating $884.3 million to ROP. These transfers were made to further diversify ROP's portfolio. Under the business combinations guidance (Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, 805-50), these transfers were determined to be transfers of businesses between the indirect parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. As such, the assets and liabilities of the properties were transferred at their carrying values and were recorded as of the beginning of the current reporting period as though the assets and liabilities had been transferred at that date. The consolidated financial statements and financial information presented for all prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted to furnish comparative information.

Location	Type	Number ofProperties	Approximate Square Feet (unaudited)	Weighted AverageOccupancy(1) (unaudited)
Commercial:
Manhattan	Office	16	8,463,245	9496.94	%
	Retail(2)(3)	5	352,892	97.6	%
	Fee Interest	2	197,654	100.0	%
		23	9,013,791	9596.15	%
Suburban	Office	1918	3,~~287~~251,~~800~~000	8083.02	%
	Retail	1	52,000	100.0	%
		20	3,339,800	80.3	%
		19	3,303,000	83.4	%
Total commercial properties		4342	12,~~353~~316,~~591~~791	9193.10	%
Residential:
Manhattan	Residential(2)	—	222,855	8993.51	%
Total portfolio		4342	12,~~576~~539,~~446~~646	9193.10	%

____________________________________________________________________

(2) As of December 31, ~~2015,~~2016 we owned a building that was comprised of approximately 270,132 square feet (unaudited) of retail space and approximately 222,855 square feet (unaudited) of residential space. For the purpose of this report, we have included the building in the number of retail properties ~~count~~we ~~and~~own. However, we have ~~bifurcated~~included only the retail square footage ~~into~~in the retail approximate square footage, and have listed the balance of the square footage as residential ~~components~~square footage.

~~(3) Includes two unconsolidated joint venture retail properties at 131-137 Spring Street comprised of approximately 68,342 square feet (unaudited).~~46

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

As(3) ofIncludes ~~December 31,~~two ~~2015,~~unconsolidated wejoint ~~also~~venture ~~held~~retail ~~debt,~~properties ~~preferred~~at ~~equity~~131-137 ~~and~~Spring ~~other~~Street ~~investments~~comprised ~~with~~of aapproximately ~~book~~68,342 ~~value~~square offeet $1(unaudited).~~8 billion.~~

As of December 31, 2016, we also held debt, preferred equity and other investments with a book value of $2.0 billion, including $0.3 billion of debt and preferred equity investments and other financing receivables that are included in balance sheet line items other than the Debt and Preferred Equity Investments line item.

Subsequent Events

In January 2017, we entered into an agreement to sell 520 White Plains Road in Tarrytown, NY for a gross sale price of $21.0 million. We expect to record a $11.1 million charge in connection with the sale, which will be included in depreciable real estate reserves. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of 2017. At December 31, 2016, we determined that the held for sale criteria was not met for this property as it was not probable that the sale of the asset would be completed within one year.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our subsidiaries, which are wholly-owned or controlled by us. Entities which we do not control through our voting interest and entities which are variable interest entities, but where we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method ~~or as preferred equity investments~~. See Note 5, "Debt, and Preferred Equity ~~and Other~~ Investments." ~~ROP's investments in majority-owned~~ and ~~controlled~~Note ~~real~~6, ~~estate~~"Investments ~~joint ventures are reflected~~ in ~~the~~Unconsolidated ~~financial~~Joint ~~statements on a consolidated basis with a reduction for the noncontrolling partners' interests~~Ventures." All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

We consolidate a variable interest entity, or VIE, in which we are considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the entity that has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. Included in commercial real estate properties on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are $1.4 billion and $0.3 billion, respectively, related to our consolidated VIEs. Included in mortgages and other loans payable on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are $494.1 million and none, respectively, related to our consolidated VIEs.

A noncontrolling interest in a consolidated subsidiary is defined as the portion of the equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to us. Noncontrolling interests are required to be presented as a separate component of ~~capital~~equity in the consolidated balance sheet and the presentation of net income is modified to present earnings and other comprehensive income attributed to controlling and noncontrolling interests.

We assess the accounting treatment for each joint venture and debt and preferred equity investment. This assessment includes a review of each joint venture or limited liability company agreement to determine ~~which~~the ~~party~~rights ~~has~~provided ~~what~~to ~~rights~~each party and whether those rights are protective or participating. For all VIEs, we review such agreements in order to determine which party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. In situations where we and our partner approve, among other things, the annual budget, receive a detailed monthly reporting package, meet on a quarterly basis to review the results of the joint venture, review and approve the joint venture's tax return before filing, and approve all leases that cover more than a nominal amount of space relative to the total rentable space at each property, we do not consolidate the joint venture as we consider these to be substantive participation rights that result in shared power of the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the joint venture. Our joint venture agreements typically contain certain protective rights such as requiring partner approval to sell, finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan.

Investment in Commercial Real Estate Properties

Real estate properties are presented at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Costs directly related to the development or redevelopment of properties are capitalized. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.

A property to be disposed of is reported at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value, less its cost to sell. Once an asset is held for sale, depreciation expense is no longer recorded. The Company adopted ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015. Aswhich araised ~~result,~~ the ~~Company~~threshold ~~classified~~for ~~140~~disposals ~~Grand~~to ~~Street~~qualify ~~in White Plains, New York~~ as ~~held~~discontinued ~~for~~operations ~~sale~~to asinclude ofonly ~~September~~dispositions ~~30,~~that ~~2015,~~represent ~~and~~a ~~131-137~~strategic ~~Spring~~shift ~~Street~~in asan ofentity’s ~~June~~operations. ~~30,~~The ~~2015~~guidance ~~and~~was ~~included~~applied ~~the~~prospectively ~~results of operations in continuing operations~~ for ~~all~~new ~~periods presented~~disposals. No ~~Discontinued~~properties ~~operations~~were ~~included the results of operations of real estate assets sold or~~ held for sale ~~prior to January 1, 2015. This included 673 First Avenue, which was sold~~ during ~~2014~~2016. ~~See Note 4, "Property Dispositions."~~

~~Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:~~47

Category		Term
Building (fee ownership)		40 years
Building improvements		shorter of remaining life of the building or useful life
Building (leasehold interest)		lesser of 40 years or remaining term of the lease
Property under capital lease		remaining lease term
Furniture and fixtures		four to seven years
Tenant improvements		shorter of remaining term of the lease or useful life

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~Depreciation~~The ~~expense~~Company ~~(including~~classified ~~amortization~~140 ofGrand ~~the~~Street ~~capital~~in ~~lease~~White ~~asset)~~Plains, ~~amounted~~New toYork ~~$187.2~~as ~~million~~held for sale as of September 30, ~~$184.3~~2015 ~~million~~and 131-137 Spring Street as of June 30, 2015 and ~~$170.0~~included ~~million~~the results of operations in continuing operations for all periods presented. Discontinued operations included the ~~years~~results ~~ended~~of ~~December 31~~operations of real estate assets sold or held for sale prior to January 1, 2015,. ~~2014~~This ~~and~~included ~~2013~~673 First Avenue, ~~respectively~~which was sold during 2014.

OnSee ~~a periodic basis~~Note 4, we"Properties ~~assess~~Held ~~whether~~for ~~there~~Sale are any indications that the value of our real estate properties may be other than temporarily impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. A property's value is considered impaired if management's estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and ~~without interest charges for consolidated properties) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property~~Dispositions." ~~To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the calculated fair value of the property.~~

WeProperties ~~also evaluate our real estate properties for potential impairment when a real estate property has been classified as held for sale. Real estate assets held for sale~~ are ~~valued~~depreciated atusing the ~~lower~~straight-line ofmethod ~~either~~over ~~their carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. During~~ the ~~three~~estimated ~~months~~useful ~~ended~~lives ~~September 30, 2015, we recorded a $10.0 million charge in connection with the expected sale~~ of ~~one of our properties, which closed in~~ the ~~fourth quarter of 2015~~assets. ~~This~~The ~~charge~~estimated isuseful ~~included~~lives inare ~~depreciable~~as real estate reserves in the consolidated statements of operations. Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2015, we do not believe that there were any indicators of impairment at this property. See Note 4, "Property Dispositions." We do not believe that there were any indicators of impairment at any of our consolidated properties at December 31, 2015.follows:



Category		Term
Building (fee ownership)		40 years
Building improvements		shorter of remaining life of the building or useful life
Building (leasehold interest)		lesser of 40 years or remaining term of the lease
Property under capital lease		remaining lease term
Furniture and fixtures		four to seven years
Tenant improvements		shorter of remaining term of the lease or useful life

Depreciation expense (including amortization of capital lease assets) totaled $196.2 million, $187.2 million, and $184.3 million and for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indications that the value of our real estate properties may be other than temporarily impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. A property's value is considered impaired if management's estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the calculated fair value of the property.

We also evaluate our real estate properties for potential impairment when a real estate property has been classified as held for sale. Real estate assets held for sale are valued at the lower of either their carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. We do not believe that there were any indicators of impairment at any of our consolidated properties at December 31, 2016.

During the third quarter of 2015, we recorded a $10.0 million charge in connection with the expected sale of one of our properties, which closed in the fourth quarter of 2015. This charge is included in depreciable real estate reserves in the consolidated statements of operations.

We incur a variety of costs in the development and leasing of our properties. After determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. Determination of when a development project is substantially complete and capitalization must cease involves a degree of judgment. The costs of land and building under development include specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include, but are not limited to, pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes, salaries and related costs and other costs incurred during the period of development. We consider a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year after major construction activity ceases. We cease capitalization on the portions substantially completed and occupied or held available for occupancy, and capitalize only those costs associated with the portions under construction.

We ~~allocate~~recognize the ~~purchase~~assets ~~price~~acquired, ofliabilities ~~real~~assumed ~~estate to land and building~~ (~~inclusive~~including ~~of tenant improvements~~contingencies) and, ifany ~~determined~~noncontrolling tointerests bein ~~material,~~an ~~intangibles,~~acquired ~~such~~entity asat ~~the~~their ~~value~~fair ofvalues ~~above-~~on ~~and below-market leases and origination costs associated with~~ the ~~in-place~~acquisition ~~leases~~date. We ~~depreciate~~expense ~~the~~transaction ~~amount~~costs ~~allocated~~related to ~~building~~the ~~(inclusive~~acquisition of ~~tenant~~certain ~~improvements)~~assets ~~over~~as ~~their estimated useful lives~~incurred, which ~~generally~~are ~~range~~included ~~from~~in ~~three~~transaction torelated 40costs ~~years.~~on Weour ~~amortize~~consolidated ~~the~~statements ~~amount allocated to the above- and below-market leases over the remaining term~~ of ~~the~~operations. In ~~associated lease~~January, ~~which generally range from one to 14 years~~2017, ~~and record it as either an increase (in~~ the ~~case~~FASB ofpublished ~~below-market~~ASU ~~leases)~~No. ~~or a decrease (in the case of above~~2017-~~market~~01, ~~leases)~~Business toCombinations: ~~rental~~Clarifying ~~income. We amortize~~ the ~~amount~~Definition ~~allocated to the values associated with in-place leases over the expected term~~ of ~~the~~a ~~associated lease~~Business, which ~~generally~~provides ~~ranges~~guidance ~~from~~as ~~one~~ to 14whether ~~years.~~transaction Ifcosts ashould ~~tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related intangible will~~ be ~~written~~expensed ~~off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the lease (~~or ~~charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date)~~capitalized. Refer We assess fair value of the leases based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. To the extent acquired leases contain fixed rate renewal options that are below-market and determined to beNote ~~material~~2, weAccounting ~~amortize~~Standards ~~such~~Updates ~~below-market~~for ~~lease value into rental income over~~ the ~~renewal~~Company's ~~period.~~adoption As of ~~December 31, 2015,~~ the ~~weighted~~new ~~average amortization period for above-market leases, below-market leases, and in-place lease costs is 4~~guidance.~~4 years, 13.3 years, and 11.9 years, respectively.~~

WeWhen ~~recognized~~we ~~$24.9~~acquire ~~million,~~our ~~$21.0~~partner's ~~million,~~equity ~~and~~interest ~~$19.0~~in ~~million~~an ofexisting ~~rental~~unconsolidated ~~revenue~~joint ~~for~~venture ~~the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014~~ and ~~2013,~~gain ~~respectively,~~control ~~for~~over the ~~amortization of aggregate below-market leases in excess of above-market leases and a reduction in lease origination costs~~investment, ~~resulting~~we ~~from~~record the ~~allocation~~consolidated ofinvestment ~~the~~at ~~purchase~~fair ~~price of the applicable properties~~value. The ~~increase~~difference inbetween ~~rental revenue for~~ the ~~year~~book ~~ended~~value ~~December 31, 2013 is net~~ of ~~$6.8~~our ~~million~~equity ~~resulting~~investment ~~from~~on the ~~write-off~~purchase ofdate balances associated with a former tenant. Excluding this non-recurring charge, we recognized an increase of $25.8 million in rental revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the amortization of aggregate below-market leases in excess of above-market leases and ~~reductions~~our inshare ~~lease origination costs. In March 2014, we recognized income~~ of ~~$0.3 million for~~ the ~~amortization~~fair ~~of the remaining~~ value of ~~below-market~~the ~~rate~~investment's ~~mortgage~~purchase atprice 16is ~~Court~~recorded ~~Street, Brooklyn,~~ as a ~~result~~purchase ofprice ~~early~~fair ~~repayment~~value ofadjustment ~~debt.~~in ~~Excluding~~our ~~this~~consolidated ~~one-time~~statements ~~income, we recognized as a reduction to interest expense the amortization~~ of ~~the above-market rate mortgages assumed of $2~~operations.1 ~~million for the~~

4748

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~year~~We ~~ended~~allocate ~~December~~the 31purchase price of real estate to land and building (inclusive of tenant improvements) and, ~~2014~~if determined to be material, intangibles, such as the value of above- and below-market leases and origination costs associated with the in-place leases. We ~~recognized~~depreciate the amount allocated to building (inclusive of tenant improvements) over their estimated useful lives, which generally range from three to 40 years. We amortize the amount allocated to the above- and below-market leases over the remaining term of the associated lease, which generally range from one to 14 years, and record it as either an increase (in the case of below-market leases) or a ~~reduction~~decrease (in the case of above-market leases) to ~~interest~~rental ~~expense~~income. We amortize the ~~amortization~~amount ofallocated to the ~~above~~values associated with in-~~market~~place ~~rate~~leases ~~mortgages~~over ~~assumed~~the expected term of $0the associated lease, which generally ranges from one to 14 years.4 ~~million~~If a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and ~~$(2~~no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balance of the related intangible will be written off.5 The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized as an expense over the remaining life of the lease (or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date). ~~million~~We ~~for~~assess fair value of the ~~years~~leases ~~ended~~based ~~December~~on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. To the extent acquired leases contain fixed rate renewal options that are below-market and determined to be material, we amortize such below-market lease value into rental income over the renewal period. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the weighted average amortization period for above-market leases, below-market leases, and ~~2013~~in-place lease costs is 4.1 years, 28.8 years, and 11.3 years, respectively.

~~The~~We ~~following~~recognized ~~summarizes~~$20.2 ~~our~~million, ~~identified~~$24.9 ~~intangible~~million, ~~assets~~and ~~(acquired~~$21.0 ~~above~~million of rental revenue for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for the amortization of aggregate below-market leases ~~and~~ in excess of above-~~place~~market leases) and ~~intangible~~a ~~liabilities~~reduction in lease origination costs, resulting from the allocation of the purchase price of the applicable properties. We recognized as an increase (~~acquired~~a ~~below~~reduction) to interest expense the amortization of the above-market ~~leases)~~rate asmortgages assumed of $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and 2015, respectively. In March 2014, ~~(in~~we ~~thousands):~~recognized income of $0.3 million for the amortization of the remaining value of below-market rate mortgage at 16 Court Street, Brooklyn, as a result of early repayment of debt. Excluding this one-time income, we recognized as a reduction to interest expense the amortization of the above-market rate mortgages assumed of $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.

	December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
				(as adjusted)
Identified intangible assets (included in other assets):
Gross amount	$	307,824		$	297,238
Accumulated amortization	(235,040		)	(216,841		)
Net	$	72,784		$	80,397
Identified intangible liabilities (included in deferred revenue):
Gross amount	$	523,228		$	450,326
Accumulated amortization	(346,857		)	(322,694		)
Net	$	176,371		$	127,632

The following summarizes our identified intangible assets (acquired above-market leases and in-place leases) and intangible liabilities (acquired below-market leases) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

The estimated annual amortization of acquired below-market leases, net of acquired above-market leases (a component of rental revenue), for each of the five succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):



	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015

Identified intangible assets (included in other assets):
Gross amount	$	311,830		$	307,824
Accumulated amortization	(253,064		)	(235,040		)
Net⁽¹⁾	$	58,766		$	72,784
Identified intangible liabilities (included in deferred revenue):
Gross amount	$	524,793		$	523,228
Accumulated amortization	(368,738		)	(346,857		)
Net⁽¹⁾	$	156,055		$	176,371

2016	$	3,017
2017	4,994
2018	6,548
2019	7,128
2020	6,919

____________________________________________________________________

~~The~~(1) ~~estimated~~As ~~annual~~of ~~amortization~~December of31, ~~all~~2016, ~~other~~no ~~identifiable~~net intangible assets (aand ~~component~~no ofnet ~~depreciation~~intangible ~~and~~liabilities ~~amortization~~were ~~expense)~~reclassified ~~including~~to ~~tenant~~assets ~~improvements~~held for ~~each~~sale ofand ~~the~~liabilities ~~five~~related ~~succeeding~~to ~~years~~assets isheld asfor ~~follows (in thousands):~~sale.

2016	$	4,600
2017	3,326
2018	2,177
2019	1,751
2020	1,588

The estimated annual amortization of acquired above-market leases, net of acquired (below-market) leases (a component of rental revenue), for each of the five succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures



2017	$	(15,745	)
2018	(13,628		)
2019	(13,135		)
2020	(12,342		)
2021	(3,831		)

We account for our investment in the unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting in cases where we exercise significant influence, but do not control the entity and are not considered to be the primary beneficiary. We consolidate those joint ventures that we control or which are VIEs and where we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. In all the joint ventures, the rights of the joint venture partner are both protective as well as participating. Unless we are determined to be the primary beneficiary in a VIE, these participating rights preclude us from consolidating these VIE entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in net income (loss) and cash contributions and distributions. Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures is allocated based on our ownership or economic interest in the joint venture. When a capital event (as defined in each joint venture agreement) such as a refinancing occurs, if return thresholds are met, future equity income will be allocated at our increased economic interest. We recognize incentive income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures as income to the extent it is earned and not subject to a clawback feature. Distributions we receive from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in excess of our basis in the investment are recorded as offsets to our investment balance if we remain liable for future obligations of the joint venture or may otherwise be committed to provide future additional financial support. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to us. See Note 5, "Debt, Preferred Equity and Other Investments."49

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~impairment~~The ~~based~~estimated onannual ~~the~~amortization ~~joint~~of ~~venture's~~all ~~projected~~other ~~discounted~~identifiable ~~cash~~assets ~~flows.~~(a Wecomponent doof ~~not~~depreciation ~~believe~~and ~~that~~amortization ~~the~~expense) ~~values~~including oftenant ~~any~~improvements for each of ~~our~~the ~~equity~~five ~~investments~~succeeding ~~were~~years ~~impaired~~is ~~at December 31,~~as ~~2015.~~follows (in thousands):



2017	$	14,403
2018	9,195
2019	7,519
2020	6,617
2021	3,719

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash primarily consists of security deposits held on behalf of our tenants, interest reserves, as well as capital improvement and real estate tax escrows required under certain loan agreements.

Fair Value Measurements

See Note 11, "Fair Value Measurements."

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

We account for our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting in cases where we exercise significant influence over, but do not control, these entities and are not considered to be the primary beneficiary. We consolidate those joint ventures that we control or which are VIEs and where we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. In all these joint ventures, the rights of the joint venture partner are both protective as well as participating. Unless we are determined to be the primary beneficiary in a VIE, these participating rights preclude us from consolidating these VIE entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in net income (loss) and cash contributions and distributions. Equity in net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures is allocated based on our ownership or economic interest in each joint venture. When a capital event (as defined in each joint venture agreement) such as a refinancing occurs, if return thresholds are met, future equity income will be allocated at our increased economic interest. We recognize incentive income from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures as income to the extent it is earned and not subject to a clawback feature. Distributions we receive from unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in excess of our basis in the investment are recorded as offsets to our investment balance if we remain liable for future obligations of the joint venture or may otherwise be committed to provide future additional financial support. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to us. See Note 6, "Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures."

We assess our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for recoverability, and if it is determined that a loss in value of the investment is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate our equity investments for impairment based on the joint ventures' projected discounted cash flows. We do not believe that the values of any of our equity investments were impaired at December 31, 2016.

Deferred Lease Costs

Deferred lease costs consist of fees and direct costs incurred to initiate and renew operating leases and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related lease term.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal, title and other third party costs associated with obtaining commitments for financing which result in a closing of such financing. These costs are amortized over the terms of the respective agreements. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions, which do not close, are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the ~~financing will not close.~~

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, 2016

financing will not close. Deferred debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability.

Revenue Recognition

Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Rental revenue recognition commences when the tenant takes possession or controls the physical use of the leased space. In order for the tenant to take possession, the leased space must be substantially ready for its intended use. To determine whether the leased space is substantially ready for its intended use, management evaluates whether we are or the tenant is the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes. When management concludes that we are the owner of tenant improvements, rental revenue recognition begins when the tenant takes possession of the finished space, which is when such tenant improvements are substantially complete. In certain instances, when management concludes that we are not the owner (the tenant is the owner) of tenant improvements, rental revenue recognition begins when the tenant takes possession of or controls the space. When management concludes that we are the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes, we record amounts funded to construct the tenant improvements as a capital asset. For these tenant improvements, we record amounts reimbursed by tenants as a reduction of the capital asset. When management concludes that the tenant is the owner of tenant improvements for accounting purposes, we record our contribution towards those improvements as a lease incentive, which is included in deferred costs, net on our consolidated balance sheets and amortized as a reduction to rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The excess of rents recognized over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases are included in deferred rents receivable on the consolidated balance sheets. We establish, on a current basis, an allowance for future potential tenant credit losses, which may occur against this account. The balance reflected on the consolidated balance sheets is net of such allowance.

In addition to base rent, our tenants also generally will pay their pro rata share of increases in real estate taxes and operating expenses for the building over a base year. In some leases, in lieu of paying additional rent based upon increases in building operating expenses, the tenant will pay additional rent based upon increases in the wage rate paid to porters over the porters' wage rate in effect during a base year or increases in the consumer price index over the index value in effect during a base year. In addition, many of our leases contain fixed percentage increases over the base rent to cover escalations. Electricity is most often supplied by the landlord either on a sub-metered basis, or rent inclusion basis (i.e., a fixed fee is included in the rent for electricity, which amount may increase based upon increases in electricity rates or increases in electrical usage by the tenant). Base building services other than electricity (such as heat, air conditioning and freight elevator service during business hours, and base building cleaning) are typically provided at no additional cost, with the tenant paying additional rent only for services which exceed base building services or for services which are provided outside normal business hours. These escalations are based on actual expenses incurred in the prior calendar year. If the expenses in the current year are different from those in the prior year, then during the current year, the escalations will be adjusted to reflect the actual expenses for the current year.

49We record a gain on sale of real estate when title is conveyed to the buyer, subject to the buyer's financial commitment being sufficient to provide economic substance to the sale and provided that we have no substantial economic involvement with the buyer.

Interest income on debt and preferred equity investments is accrued based on the contractual terms of the instruments and when, in the opinion of management, it is deemed collectible. Some debt and preferred equity investments provide for accrual of interest at specified rates, which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management's determination that accrued interest is ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower. If management cannot make this determination, interest income above the current pay rate is recognized only upon actual receipt.

Deferred origination fees, original issue discounts and loan origination costs, if any, are recognized as an adjustment to the interest income over the terms of the related investments using the effective interest method. Fees received in connection with loan commitments are also deferred until the loan is funded and are then recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to yield. Discounts or premiums associated with the purchase of loans are amortized or accreted into interest income as a yield adjustment on the effective interest method based on expected cash flows through the expected maturity date of the related investment. If we purchase a debt or preferred equity investment at a discount, intend to hold it until maturity and expect to recover the full value of the investment, we accrete the discount into income as an adjustment to yield over the term of the investment. If we purchase a debt or preferred equity investment at a discount with the intention of foreclosing on the collateral, we do not accrete the discount. For debt investments acquired at a discount for credit quality, the difference between contractual cash flows and expected cash flows at acquisition is not accreted. Anticipated exit fees, the collection of which is expected, are also recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to yield.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

Interest income on debt and preferred equity investments is accrued based on the outstanding principal amount and contractual terms of the instruments and when, in the opinion of management, it is deemed collectible. Some debt and preferred equity investments provide for accrual of interest at specified rates, which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management's determination that accrued interest is ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower. If management cannot make this determination, interest income above the current pay rate is recognized only upon actual receipt.

Deferred origination fees, original issue discounts and loan origination costs, if any, are recognized as an adjustment to the interest income over the terms of the related investments using the effective interest method. Fees received in connection with loan commitments are also deferred until the loan is funded and are then recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to yield. Discounts or premiums associated with the purchase of loans are amortized or accreted into interest income as a yield adjustment on the effective interest method based on expected cashflows through the expected maturity date of the related investment. If we purchase a debt or preferred equity investment at a discount, intend to hold it until maturity and expect to recover the full value of the investment, we accrete the discount into income as an adjustment to yield over the term of the investment. If we purchase a debt or preferred equity investment at a discount with the intention of foreclosing on the collateral, we do not accrete the discount. For debt investments acquired at a discount for credit quality, the difference between contractual cash flows and expected cash flows at acquisition is not accreted. Anticipated exit fees, the collection of which is expected, are also recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to yield.

We may syndicate a portion of the loans that we originate or sell the loans individually. When a transaction meets the criteria for sale accounting, we derecognize the loan sold and recognize gain or loss based on the difference between the sales price and the carrying value of the loan sold. Any related unamortized deferred origination fees, original issue discounts, loan origination costs, discounts or premiums at the time of sale are recognized as an adjustment to the gain or loss on sale, which is included in investment income on the consolidated ~~statements~~statement of operations. Any fees received at the time of sale or syndication are recognized as part of investment income.

Asset management fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the asset management agreement.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Reserve for Possible Credit Losses

50Rent Expense

Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. The excess of the rent expense recognized over the amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying lease is included in the deferred lease payable on the consolidated balance sheets.

Exchangeable Debt Instruments

The initial proceeds from exchangeable debt that may be settled in cash, including partial cash settlements, are bifurcated between a liability component and an equity component associated with the embedded conversion option. The objective of the accounting guidance is to require the liability and equity components of exchangeable debt to be separately accounted for in a manner such that the interest expense on the exchangeable debt is not recorded at the stated rate of interest but rather at an effective rate that reflects the issuer's conventional debt borrowing rate at the date of issuance. We calculate the liability component of exchangeable debt based on the present value of the contractual cash flows discounted at our comparable market conventional debt borrowing rate at the date of issuance. The difference between the principal amount and the fair value of the liability component is reported as a discount on the exchangeable debt that is accreted as additional interest expense from the issuance date through the contractual maturity date using the effective interest method. A portion of this additional interest expense may be capitalized

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~investment~~to ~~designated~~the asdevelopment ~~held~~and redevelopment balances qualifying for ~~sale~~interest capitalization each period. InThe ~~such~~liability ~~situations,~~component of the ~~investment~~exchangeable ~~will~~debt beis ~~reclassified~~reported atnet ~~its~~of ~~net~~discounts ~~carrying~~on ~~value~~our toconsolidated ~~debt~~balance ~~and~~sheets. ~~preferred~~We ~~equity~~calculate ~~investments~~the ~~held~~equity tocomponent ~~maturity.~~of ~~For~~exchangeable ~~these~~debt ~~reclassified~~based ~~investments,~~on the difference between the ~~current~~initial ~~carrying~~proceeds ~~value~~received from the issuance of the exchangeable debt and the ~~expected~~fair ~~cash~~value toof bethe ~~collected~~liability component at ~~maturity~~the ~~will~~issuance bedate. ~~accreted~~The ~~into~~equity ~~income~~component ~~over~~is ~~the~~included ~~remaining~~in ~~term~~additional paid-in-capital, net of issuance costs, on our consolidated balance sheets. We allocate issuance costs for exchangeable debt between the ~~investment~~liability and the equity components based on their relative values.

Rent Expense

Income Taxes

~~ROP~~SL Green is taxed as a ~~partnership~~REIT ~~and~~under Section 856(c) of the Code. As a REIT, SL Green generally is not subject to Federal income tax. To maintain its qualification as a ~~result~~REIT, ~~all~~SL Green must distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and ~~losses~~meet ofcertain ~~the~~other ~~partnership~~requirements. ~~are~~If ~~allocated~~SL Green fails to ~~the~~qualify ~~partners~~as ~~for~~a ~~inclusion~~REIT in ~~their~~any ~~respective~~taxable year, SL Green will be subject to Federal income tax ~~returns~~on SL Green's taxable income at regular corporate rates. NoSL ~~provision~~Green ~~has~~may ~~been~~also ~~made~~be ~~for~~subject ~~income~~to certain state, local and franchise taxes. inUnder ~~the~~certain ~~consolidated~~circumstances, ~~financial~~Federal ~~statements~~income ~~since~~and ~~such~~excise taxes, ifmay ~~any,~~be ~~are~~due ~~the~~on ~~responsibility~~SL ofGreen's ~~the~~undistributed ~~individual~~taxable ~~partners~~income.

ROP is a disregarded entity of SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P. for federal income tax purposes, and, as a result, all income and losses of ROP are considered income and losses of SL Green Operating Partnership, L. P. No provision has been made for income taxes in the consolidated financial statements since such taxes, if any, are the responsibility of the individual partners of SL Green Operating Partnership, L.P.

We follow a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. The use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for derecognition of tax positions is prohibited.

Shares Contributed by Parent Company

We present shares of SL Green common stock as a contra-equity account in our financial statements.

Exchangeable Debt Instruments

The initial proceeds from exchangeable debt that may be settled in cash, including partial cash settlements, must be bifurcated between a liability component and an equity component associated with the embedded conversion option. The objective of the accounting guidance is to require the liability and equity components of exchangeable debt to be separately accounted for in a manner such that the interest expense on the exchangeable debt is not recorded at the stated rate of interest but rather at an effective rate that reflects the issuer's conventional debt borrowing rate at the date of issuance. We calculate the liability component of exchangeable debt based on the present value of the contractual cash flows discounted at our comparable market conventional debt borrowing rate at the date of issuance. The difference between the principal amount and the fair value of the liability component is reported as a discount on the exchangeable debt that is accreted as additional interest expense from the issuance date through the contractual maturity date using the effective interest method. A portion of this additional interest expense may be capitalized to the development and redevelopment balances qualifying for interest capitalization each period. The liability component of the exchangeable debt is reported net of discounts on our consolidated balance sheets. We calculate the equity component of exchangeable debt based on the difference between the initial proceeds received from the issuance of the exchangeable debt and the fair value of the liability component at the issuance date. The equity component is included in additional paid-in-capital, net of issuance costs, on our consolidated balance sheets. We allocate issuance costs for exchangeable debt between the liability and the equity components based on their relative values.

Fair Value Measurements

See Note 10, "Fair Value Measurements."

Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of business, we use a variety of commonly used derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, caps, ~~collar~~collars and floors, to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk. Effectiveness is essential for those derivatives that we intend to qualify for hedge accounting. Some derivative instruments are associated with an anticipated transaction. In those cases, hedge effectiveness criteria also require that it be probable that the underlying transaction occurs. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria are formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract.

To determine the fair values of derivative instruments, we use a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date. For the majority of financial instruments including most derivatives, long-term investments and long-term debt, standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models, replacement cost, and termination cost are used to determine fair value. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value, and such value may never actually be realized.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, 2015

In the normal course of business, we are exposed to the effect of interest rate changes and limit these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives. To address exposure to interest rates, derivatives are used primarily to fix the rate on debt based on floating-rate indices and manage the cost of borrowing obligations.

We use a variety of commonly used derivative products that are considered plain vanilla derivatives. These derivatives typically include interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors. We expressly prohibit the use of unconventional derivative instruments and using derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Further, we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors.

We may employ swaps, forwards or purchased options to hedge qualifying forecasted transactions. Gains and losses related to these transactions are deferred and recognized in net income as interest expense in the same period or periods that the underlying transaction occurs, expires or is otherwise terminated.

Hedges that are reported at fair value and presented on the balance sheet could be characterized as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges. Interest rate caps and collars are examples of cash flow hedges. Cash flow hedges address the risk associated with future cash flows of interest payments. For all hedges held by us and which were deemed to be fully effective in meeting the hedging objectives established by our corporate policy governing interest rate risk management, no net gains or losses were reported in earnings. The changes in fair value of hedge instruments are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. For derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss resulting from the change in the estimated fair value of the derivative instruments is recognized in current earnings during the period of change.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, 2016

instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss, resulting from the change in the estimated fair value of the derivative instruments, is recognized in current earnings during the period of change.

Shares Contributed by Parent Company

We present shares of SL Green common stock as a contra-equity account in our financial statements.

Earnings per Unit

Earnings per unit was not computed in ~~2015~~2016, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 as there were no outstanding common units held by third parties at December 31, ~~2015~~2016, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with ~~U.S.~~accounting ~~GAAP~~principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments, debt and preferred equity investments and accounts receivable. We place our cash investments in excess of insured amounts with high quality financial institutions. The collateral securing our debt and preferred equity investments is located in New York City. See Note 5, "Debt, and Preferred Equity ~~and Other~~ Investments." We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our tenants and require most tenants to provide security deposits or letters of credit. Though these security deposits and letters of credit are insufficient to meet the total value of a tenant's lease obligation, they are a measure of good faith and a source of funds to offset the economic costs associated with lost ~~rent~~revenue and the costs associated with re-tenanting a space. ~~Although~~The ~~the~~ properties in our real estate portfolio are primarily located in Manhattan, we also have properties located in Brooklyn, Westchester County, Connecticut and New Jersey. The tenants located in our buildings operate in various industries. No tenant in the portfolio accounted for more than 5.0% of our share of annualized cash rent, including our share of joint venture annualized cash rent, at December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Approximately 1513.45%, 912.76%, 8.2%, 76.76%, 76.52%, 75.26%, 65.76%, and 65.65% of our share of annualized cash rent for consolidated properties was attributable to 919 Third Avenue, 1185 Avenue of the Americas, 625 Madison Avenue, ~~919 Third Avenue,~~750 Third Avenue, 810 Seventh Avenue, ~~1350 Avenue of the Americas,~~ 555 West 57th Street, ~~and~~ 125 Park Avenue, and 1350 Avenue of the Americas, respectively, for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Annualized cash rent for all other consolidated properties was below 5.0%.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, 15.4%, 9.7%, 8.2%, 7.7%, 7.5%, 7.2%, 6.7%, and 6.6% of our share of annualized cash rent for consolidated properties was attributable to 1185 Avenue of the Americas, 625 Madison Avenue, 919 Third Avenue,750 Third Avenue, 810 Seventh Avenue, 1350 Avenue of the Americas, 555 West 57th Street, and 125 Park Avenue, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, 17.4%, 9.4%, 8.7%, 8.6%, and 7.8%, of our share of annualized cash rent was attributable to 1185 Avenue of the Americas, 625 Madison Avenue, 750 Third Avenue, 919 Third Avenue and 1350 Avenue of the Americas, respectively.

Reclassification

Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to our current year presentation ~~primarily in order to include the transfer of two properties, SL Green's tenancy in common interest in a fee interest and one entity that held debt investments and financing receivables in 2015~~.

Accounting Standards Updates

In ~~February~~January, ~~2016~~2017, the ~~Financial~~FASB issued Accounting Standards ~~Board,~~Update or(ASU) ~~FASB~~No. 2017-01, ~~issued~~Business ~~guidance~~Combinations ~~that~~(Topic ~~amends~~805): Clarifying the ~~existing~~Definition ~~accounting~~of ~~standards~~a ~~for~~Business The ~~lease~~guidance ~~accounting,~~clarifies ~~including~~the ~~requiring~~definition ~~lessees~~of toa ~~recognize~~business ~~most~~and ~~leases~~provides onguidance ~~their~~to ~~balance~~assist ~~sheets~~with ~~and~~determining ~~making~~whether ~~targeted~~transactions ~~improvements~~should tobe ~~lessor~~accounted ~~accounting~~for ~~(Accounting~~as ~~Standards~~acquisitions ~~Update,~~of assets or ~~ASU, No~~businesses. The ~~2016-02).~~main ~~The~~provision ~~guidance~~is ~~requires~~that aan ~~modified~~acquiree ~~retrospective~~is ~~transition~~not ~~approach~~a ~~for~~business if substantially all ~~leases~~of ~~existing~~the ~~at,~~fair value of the gross assets is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or ~~entered~~group ~~into~~of ~~after,~~assets. The Company adopted the guidance on the issuance date ofeffective ~~initial~~January ~~application~~5, ~~with~~2017. anThe ~~option~~Company toexpects ~~use~~that ~~certain~~most ~~transition~~of ~~relief.~~our ~~The~~real estate acquisitions will be considered asset acquisitions under the new guidance and that transaction costs will be ~~effective~~capitalized ~~for~~to ~~fiscal~~the ~~years~~investment ~~beginning~~basis ~~after~~which ~~December~~is ~~15,~~then ~~2018,~~subject ~~and~~to ~~interim~~a ~~periods~~purchase price allocation based on relative fair value.

52In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The ASU provides final guidance on eight cash flow issues, including debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, distributions received from equity method investees, separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle, and others. The amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~within~~adoption ~~those~~is ~~fiscal~~permitted, ~~years.~~including ~~Early~~ adoption isin ~~permitted~~an interim period. The Company has not yet adopted this new guidance and is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new accounting standard on the Company'’s consolidated financial statements.

In ~~January~~ June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-0113, ~~(ASC~~Financial ~~825~~Instruments-~~10),~~Credit ~~Recognition~~Losses ~~and~~(Topic 326): Measurement of ~~Financial~~Credit ~~Assets~~Losses ~~and~~on Financial ~~Liabilities~~Instruments. The guidance ~~requires~~changes how entities towill measure ~~equity~~credit ~~investments~~losses ~~that~~for domost ~~not~~financial ~~result~~assets ~~in consolidation~~ and ~~are~~certain ~~not~~other ~~accounted~~instruments ~~for~~that ~~under~~aren’t ~~the~~measured ~~equity method~~ at fair value ~~and~~through tonet ~~record~~income. The ~~changes~~guidance inreplaces ~~instruments-specific~~the ~~credit~~current ~~risk~~‘incurred ~~for~~loss’ ~~financial~~model ~~liabilities~~with ~~measured~~an ~~under~~‘expected ~~the~~loss’ ~~fair value option in other comprehensive income~~approach. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017~~2019, ~~and~~including ~~for~~ interim periods ~~therein~~within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted after December 2018. The Company has not yet adopted this new guidance and is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new accounting standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In ~~September~~March ~~2015~~2016, the FASB issued ~~final~~ASU ~~guidance~~2016-07, toInvestments ~~simplify~~Equity ~~the~~Method ~~measurement-period~~and ~~adjustments~~Joint inVentures ~~business combinations~~ (~~ASU~~Topic ~~No. 2015-16~~323). The guidance eliminates the requirement that an ~~acquirer~~entity inretroactively aadopt ~~business~~the ~~combination~~equity ~~account~~method ~~for~~of ~~measurement-period~~accounting ~~adjustments~~if ~~retrospectively.~~an ~~Instead,~~investment ~~acquirers~~qualifies ~~must~~for ~~recognize~~use ~~measurement-period~~of ~~adjustments in~~ the ~~period~~equity inmethod ~~which~~as ~~they~~a ~~determine~~result ~~the~~of ~~amounts,~~an ~~including~~increase in the ~~effect~~level onof ~~earnings~~ownership or degree of ~~any~~influence. ~~amounts~~The ~~they~~amendments ~~would~~require ~~have~~that ~~recorded~~the inequity ~~previously~~method ~~periods~~investor ifadd the ~~accounting~~cost ~~had~~of ~~been~~acquiring ~~completed at~~ the ~~acquisition~~additional ~~date.~~interest ~~The~~in ~~guidance~~the isinvestee ~~effective~~to ~~for~~the ~~fiscal~~current ~~years~~basis ~~beginning~~of ~~after~~the ~~December~~investor’s ~~15,~~previously ~~2015,~~held interest and ~~for~~adopt ~~interim~~the ~~periods~~equity ~~within~~method ~~those~~of ~~fiscal~~accounting ~~years.~~as ~~Early~~of ~~adoption~~the ofdate the ~~guidance~~investment isbecomes ~~permitted~~qualified for equity method accounting. The Company adopted the guidance ~~during~~effective January 1, 2017 and there is no impact on the ~~third~~Company’s ~~quarter~~consolidated offinancial ~~2015~~statements.

In ~~April~~February ~~2015~~2016, the FASB issued ~~final~~ASU 2016-02, Leases. The guidance requires lessees to ~~simplify~~recognize ~~the~~lease ~~presentation~~assets ofand ~~debt~~lease ~~issuance~~liabilities ~~costs~~for bythose ~~requiring~~leases ~~debt~~classified ~~issuance~~as ~~costs~~operating toleases beunder ~~presented~~the asprevious astandard. ~~deduction~~Depending ~~from~~on the ~~corresponding~~lease ~~debt~~classification, ~~liability~~lessees ~~(ASU~~will ~~No.~~recognize ~~2015~~expense based on the effective interest method for finance leases or on a straight-~~03).~~line basis for operating leases. The ~~guidance~~accounting ~~requires~~applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that ~~debt~~applied ~~issuance~~under ~~costs~~the ~~related~~previous tostandard. aOne ~~recognized~~of ~~debt~~the ~~liability~~impacts on the Company will be ~~presented~~the presentation and disclosure in the ~~balance~~financial ~~sheet~~statements of non-lease components such as charges to tenants for a ~~direct~~building’s ~~deduction~~operating expenses. The non-lease components will be presented separately from the ~~carrying~~lease ~~amount~~components in both the Consolidated Statements of ~~that~~Operations ~~debt~~and ~~liability.~~Consolidated ~~The~~Balance ~~guidance~~Sheets. Another impact is ~~effective~~the ~~for~~measurement ~~fiscal~~and ~~years~~presentation ~~beginning~~of ~~after~~ground ~~December~~leases ~~15,~~under ~~2015,~~which ~~and~~the ~~interim~~Company ~~periods~~is ~~within~~lessee. The ~~those~~Company ~~fiscal~~is ~~years.~~required ~~Early~~to ~~adoption~~record ofa liability for the ~~guidance~~obligation isto ~~permitted.~~make ~~Upon~~payments ~~adoption,~~under the lease and an ~~entity~~asset ~~must~~for ~~apply~~the right to use the ~~new~~underlying ~~guidance~~asset ~~retrospectively~~during ~~for~~the ~~all~~lease ~~prior~~term ~~periods~~and ~~presented~~will inalso apply the ~~financial~~new ~~statements.~~expense recognition requirements given the lease classification. The Company ~~adopted~~is ~~the~~currently quantifying these impacts. The guidance is effective ~~January~~for 1fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2016~~2018, ~~and~~including ~~the~~interim ~~guidance~~periods ~~did~~within ~~not~~those ~~have~~fiscal ayears. ~~material~~Early ~~impact~~adoption onis ~~our~~permitted. ~~consolidated~~The ~~financial~~Company ~~statements~~anticipates adopting this guidance January 1, 2019 and will apply the modified retrospective approach.

In ~~February 2015~~January 2016, the FASB, issued ~~new~~ASU ~~guidance~~2016-01 ~~that~~(ASU ~~amends~~825-10), ~~the~~Recognition ~~current~~and ~~consolidation~~Measurement ~~guidance,~~of ~~including~~Financial ~~introducing~~Assets aand ~~separate~~Financial ~~consolidation~~Liabilities. ~~analysis~~The ~~specific~~guidance requires entities to ~~limited~~measure ~~partnerships~~equity investments that do not result in consolidation and ~~other~~are ~~similar~~not ~~entities~~accounted ~~(ASU~~for ~~No.~~under ~~2015-02).~~the ~~Under~~equity ~~this~~method ~~analysis,~~at ~~limited~~fair ~~partnerships~~value and ~~other~~to ~~similar~~record ~~entities~~changes ~~will~~in beinstruments-specific ~~considered~~credit arisk ~~VIE~~for ~~unless~~financial ~~the~~liabilities ~~limited~~measured ~~partners~~under ~~hold~~the ~~substantive~~fair ~~kick-out~~value ~~rights~~option orin ~~participating~~other ~~rights~~comprehensive income. The guidance is effective for ~~annual~~fiscal ~~and~~years ~~interim periods~~ beginning after December 15, ~~2015.~~2017, ~~Early~~and ~~adoption~~for ofinterim ~~this~~periods ~~guidance is permitted~~therein. The Company ~~adopted~~has ~~the~~not ~~guidance~~yet ~~effective~~adopted ~~January~~this 1,new ~~2016~~guidance and is currently evaluating the ~~guidance~~impact ~~did~~of ~~not~~adopting ~~have~~this anew ~~material~~accounting ~~impact~~standard on ~~our~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In ~~June~~April ~~2014~~2015, the FASB issued final guidance ~~that requires repurchase-~~to~~-maturity~~ ~~transactions~~simplify ~~to be accounted for as secured borrowings as if~~ the ~~transferor~~presentation ~~retains~~of ~~effective~~debt ~~control,~~issuance ~~even~~costs ~~though~~by ~~the~~requiring ~~transferred~~debt ~~financial~~issuance ~~assets~~costs ~~are not returned~~ to ~~the~~be ~~transferor~~presented atas ~~settlement~~a ~~and~~deduction ~~also~~from ~~eliminates~~the ~~existing~~corresponding ~~guidance~~debt ~~for~~liability ~~repurchase financings~~ (ASU ~~No. 2014~~2015-1103). ~~New~~The ~~disclosures~~guidance ~~are~~requires ~~required~~that ~~for~~debt ~~(1)~~issuance ~~certain~~costs ~~transactions~~related ~~accounted~~to ~~for~~a asrecognized ~~secured~~debt ~~borrowings~~liability ~~and~~be ~~(2)~~presented ~~transfers~~in ~~accounted for as sales when~~ the ~~transferor~~balance ~~also~~sheet ~~retains~~as ~~substantially~~a ~~all~~direct ofdeduction ~~the~~from ~~exposure to~~ the ~~economic~~carrying ~~return~~amount onof ~~the~~that ~~transferred~~debt ~~financial~~liability. ~~assets~~The ~~throughout~~Company ~~the~~adopted ~~term of~~ the ~~transaction. The~~ guidance ~~was~~ effective ~~for~~January ~~the~~1, ~~first~~2016. ~~interim or annual period beginning after December 15~~Accordingly, ~~2014, except for the disclosures related to transactions accounted for~~ as ~~secured~~of ~~borrowings~~December 31, ~~which~~2016 ~~are~~and ~~effective for periods beginning after March 15~~2015, ~~2015~~$22.8 ~~Early~~million ~~adoption~~and ~~of this guidance is prohibited~~$25.2 ~~The~~million, ~~Company~~respectively, ~~adopted~~of ~~the~~deferred ~~standard~~debt ~~beginning~~issuance incost, ~~the~~net ~~third~~of ~~quarter~~amortization ofare ~~2015~~presented as a ~~result~~direct ofreduction ~~the~~within ~~transfer~~Mortgages ~~of one entity that held debt investments~~ and ~~financing~~other ~~receivables~~loans ~~during~~payable, ~~the~~Revolving ~~third~~credit ~~quarter~~facility, ofTerm ~~2015.~~loan ~~The~~and ~~adoption~~senior ofunsecured ~~this~~notes ~~guidance did not have a material impact~~ on ~~our~~the Company's consolidated ~~financial~~balance ~~statements~~sheets.

In ~~May~~February ~~2014~~2015, the FASB issued ~~a new comprehensive revenue recognition~~ guidance ~~which~~that ~~requires~~amends ~~us to recognize revenue to depict~~ the ~~transfer~~current ofconsolidation ~~promised~~guidance, ~~goods~~including orintroducing ~~services~~a toseparate ~~customers~~consolidation inanalysis anspecific ~~amount that reflects the consideration~~ to ~~which~~limited wepartnerships ~~expect~~and toother besimilar ~~entitled~~entities ~~in exchange for those goods and services~~ (ASU ~~No. 2014~~2015-0902). Under ~~The~~this ~~guidance~~analysis, ~~also~~limited ~~requires~~partnerships ~~enhanced~~and ~~disclosures~~other tosimilar ~~help~~entities ~~users~~will ofbe ~~financial~~considered ~~statements~~a ~~better~~VIE ~~understand~~unless the ~~nature,~~limited ~~amount,~~partners ~~timing,~~hold ~~and~~substantive ~~uncertainty~~kick-out ofrights ~~revenue~~or ~~that~~participating ~~is recognized~~rights. The ~~guidance~~Company isadopted ~~effective~~the ~~for~~guidance ~~annual~~effective ~~and~~January ~~interim periods beginning after December 15~~1, 2016. ~~and~~Under ~~early~~the ~~adoption~~revised isguidance, ~~not~~certain ~~permitted. In July 2015~~entities, including the ~~FASB~~Operating ~~voted~~Partnership, tonow ~~defer~~qualify byas ~~one~~variable ~~year~~interest ~~the~~entities ~~effective~~while ~~date~~some of ~~ASU~~our ~~No.~~entities ~~2014-09~~originally ~~for~~classified ~~both~~as ~~public~~variable ~~and~~interest ~~nonpublic~~ entities ~~and~~no ~~give~~longer ~~both~~meet ~~public and private companies~~ the ~~option to early adopt using the original effective date~~criteria. The ~~new~~change ~~guidance~~in ~~can~~designation bedid ~~applied~~not ~~either~~have ~~retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or as~~ a ~~cumulative-effect~~material ~~adjustment~~impact ason ofour ~~the~~consolidated ~~date~~financial ofstatements ~~adoption.~~and ~~The~~did ~~Company~~not ischange ~~currently evaluating~~ the ~~new~~consolidation ~~guidance~~conclusion ~~to determine the impact it may have~~ on ~~our~~these ~~consolidated financial statements~~entities.

In ~~April~~May 2014, the FASB issued a new ~~guidance~~comprehensive onrevenue ~~reporting~~recognition ~~discontinued~~guidance ~~operations~~ which ~~raises~~requires ~~the~~us ~~threshold~~to ~~for~~recognize ~~disposals~~revenue to ~~qualify~~depict asthe ~~discontinued~~transfer ~~operations~~of ~~(ASU~~promised ~~No.~~goods ~~2014-08).~~or ~~The~~services ~~guidance also allows us~~ to ~~have~~customers ain ~~significant~~an ~~continuing~~amount ~~involvement~~that ~~and~~reflects ~~continuing~~the ~~cash~~consideration ~~flows~~to ~~with~~which ~~the~~we ~~discontinued~~expect ~~operations.~~to ~~Additionally,~~be ~~the~~entitled ~~guidance~~in ~~requires~~exchange ~~additional disclosures~~ for ~~discontinued~~those ~~operations~~goods and ~~new~~services ~~disclosures~~(ASU ~~for~~2014-09). ~~individually~~The ~~material~~guidance ~~disposal~~also ~~transactions~~requires ~~that~~enhanced dodisclosures ~~not~~to ~~meet~~help ~~the~~users ~~definition~~ of afinancial ~~discontinued~~statements ~~operation.~~better ~~The~~understand ~~guidance~~the ~~was~~nature, ~~effective~~amount, ~~for~~timing, ~~calendar~~and ~~year~~uncertainty ~~public~~of ~~companies~~revenue ~~beginning~~that inis ~~the~~recognized. ~~first quarter of 2015 and~~

5355

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

isIn toMarch be2016, ~~applied~~the onFASB aissued ~~prospective~~implementation ~~basis for new disposals. Early adoption of this~~ guidance ~~was~~which ~~permitted.~~clarifies ~~The~~principal ~~Company~~versus ~~adopted~~agent ~~the~~considerations ~~standard beginning~~ in ~~the~~reporting ~~first~~revenue ~~quarter~~gross ofversus ~~2015.~~net ~~The~~(ASU ~~adoption of this guidance changed the presentation of discontinued operations for all properties held for sale and/or disposed of subsequent to January 1, 2015~~2016-08).

In April 2016, the FASB issued implementation guidance which clarifies the identification of performance obligations (ASU 2016-10).

In April 2016, the FASB amended its new revenue recognition guidance on identifying performance obligations to allow entities to disregard items that are immaterial and clarify when a good or service is separately identifiable (ASU 2016-10).

In May 2016, the FASB issued implementation guidance relating to transition, collectability, noncash consideration and presentation matters (ASU 2016-12).

These ASUs are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted but not before interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The new guidance can be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company anticipates adopting this guidance January 1, 2018, and applying the cumulative-effect adoption method. Since the Company’s revenue is related to leasing activities, the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

3. Property Acquisitions

We did not acquire any properties during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.

2015 Acquisition

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we finalized the purchase price allocations for the following 2015 acquisition based on facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date for the property (in thousands):

In July 2015, we acquired the fee interest at 110 Greene Street for $255.0 million. We are currently in the process of analyzing the purchase price allocation and, as such, we have not allocated any value to intangible assets such as above-and below-market lease or in-place leases. We acquired a 90.0% controlling interest in this property for consideration that included the issuance of $5.0 million and $6.7 million aggregate liquidation preferences of Series P and Q Preferred Units, respectively, of limited partnership interest of the Operating Partnership and cash.



	110 Greene Street ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
Acquisition Date	July 2015
Ownership Type	Fee Interest
Property Type	Office

Purchase Price Allocation:
Land	$	45,120
Building and building leasehold	215,470
Above-market lease value	—
Acquired in-place leases	8,967
Other assets, net of other liabilities	—
Assets acquired	269,557
Mark-to-market assumed debt	—
Below-market lease value	(14,557		)
Derivatives	—
Liabilities assumed	(14,557		)
Purchase price	$	255,000
Net consideration funded by us at closing, excluding consideration financed by debt	$	255,000
Equity and/or debt investment held	$	—
Debt assumed	$	—

__________________________________________________________

(1)

Based on our preliminary analysis of the purchase price, we had allocated $89.3 million and $165.8 million to land and building, respectively, at 110 Greene Street. The impact to our consolidated statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 was an increase in rental revenue of $1.6 million for the amortization of aggregate below-market leases and an additional $3.1 million of depreciation expense.


(2)	We acquired a 90.0% controlling interest in this property for consideration that included the issuance of $5.0 million and $6.7 million aggregate liquidation preferences of Series P and Q Preferred Units, respectively, of limited partnership interest of the Operating Partnership and cash.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, 2016

2014 Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we finalized the purchase price allocation based on third party appraisal and additional facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition dates for the following 2014 acquisitions (in thousands):



	102 Greene Street⁽¹⁾		635 Madison Ave⁽¹⁾		115 Spring Street⁽¹⁾
Acquisition Date	October 2014		September 2014		July 2014
Ownership Type	Fee Interest		Fee Interest		Fee Interest
Property Type	Retail		Land		Retail

Purchase Price Allocation:
Land	$	8,215	$	205,632	$	11,078
Building and building leasehold	26,717		15,805		44,799
Above-market lease value	—		—		—
Acquired in-place lease value	1,015		17,345		2,037
Other assets, net of other liabilities	3		—		—
Assets acquired	35,950		238,782		57,914
Mark-to-market assumed debt	—		—		—
Below-market lease value	3,701		85,036		4,789
Liabilities assumed	3,701		85,036		4,789
Purchase price	$	32,249	$	153,746	$	53,125
Net consideration funded by us at closing, excluding consideration financed by debt	$	32,249	$	153,746	$	53,125
Equity and/or debt investment held	$	—	$	—	$	—
Debt assumed	$	—	$	—	$	—

____________________________________________________________________

(1)

Based on our preliminary analysis of the purchase price, we had allocated $11.3 million and $21.0 million to land and building, respectively, at 102 Greene Street, $153.7 million to land at 635 Madison Avenue, and $15.9 million and $37.2 million to land and building, respectively, at 115 Spring Street. The impact to our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $1.9 million in rental revenue for the amortization of aggregate below-market leases and $1.1 million of depreciation expense.

544. Property Held for Sale and Dispositions

~~Table~~Properties ofHeld ~~Contents~~for Sale

~~Reckson~~As ~~Operation~~of ~~Partnership~~December 31, L2016, no properties in our portfolio were classified as held for sale.P.

~~Notes~~Property ~~to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)~~Dispositions

~~December~~The following table summarizes the properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the properties listed below were acquired from third parties. The following summarizes our allocation of the purchase price of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon the closing of these acquisitions (in thousands):



Property	Disposition Date	Property Type	Approximate Usable Square Feet (unaudited)	Sale Price ⁽¹⁾ (in millions)		Gain (loss) on Sale⁽²⁾ (in millions)
7 International Drive	May 2016	Land	31 Acres	$	20.0	$	(6.9	)
140 Grand Street⁽³⁾	December 2015	Office	130,100	$	22.4	$	(10.5	)
131-137 Spring Street⁽⁴⁾	August 2015	Office	68,342	$	277.8	$	101.1
673 First Avenue	May 2014	Office	422,000	$	145.0	$	117.6

	315 West 33rd Street(1)		16 Court Street(2)
Acquisition Date	November 2013		April 2013
Ownership Type	Fee Interest		Fee Interest
Property Type	Residential		Office
Purchase Price Allocation:
Land	$	195,834	$	19,217
Building and building leasehold	164,429		63,210
Above-market lease value	7,084		5,122
Acquired in-place lease value	26,125		9,422
Other assets, net of other liabilities	1,142		3,380
Assets acquired	394,614		100,351
Mark-to-market assumed debt	—		294
Below-market lease value	7,839		3,885
Liabilities assumed	7,839		4,179
Purchase price	$	386,775	$	96,172
Net consideration funded by us at closing, excluding consideration financed by debt	$	386,775	$	4,000
Equity and/or debt investment held	$	—	$	11,535
Debt assumed	$	—	$	84,642

(1) During the year ended December 31, 2014, we finalized the purchase price allocation based on a third party appraisal and additional facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition dates. These adjustments did not have a material impact to our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.

(2) This property was transferred from SL Green in 2014. See Note 1, "Organization and Basis of Presentation," for further discussion. In April 2013, we acquired interests from our joint venture partner, City Investment Fund, in 16 Court Street in Brooklyn for $4.0 million. We have consolidated the ownership of the building. The transaction valued the consolidated interest at $96.2 million, inclusive of the $84.6 million mortgage encumbering the property. In April 2014, we repaid the mortgage.

4. Property Dispositions

The following table summarizes the properties sold during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:

Property	Disposition Date	Property Type	Approximate Usable Square Feet (unaudited)	Sale Price (1) (in millions)		Gain (loss) on Sale(2) (in millions)
140 Grand Street(3)	December 2015	Office	130,100	$	22.4	$	(10.5	)
131-137 Spring Street(4)	August 2015	Office	68,342	$	277.8	$	101.1
673 First Avenue	May 2014	Office	422,000	$	145.0	$	117.6
333 West 34th Street	August 2013	Office	345,400	$	220.3	$	13.8

____________________________________________________________________


(1)	Sales price represents the actual sales price for the property or the gross asset valuation for the interest in a property.

(2) The gain on sale for 131-137 Spring Street, and 673 First Avenue ~~and 333 West 34th Street~~ are net of $4.1 million, ~~$3.4 million~~ and $3.04 million, respectively, in employee compensation awards accrued in connection with the realization of these investment gains as a bonus to certain employees that were instrumental in realizing the gain on sale. ~~Additionally, amounts do not include adjustments for expenses recorded in subsequent periods.~~

(3) Gain/(loss) on sale includes a $10.0 million charge that was recorded during the third quarter of 2015. This charge is included in depreciable real estate reserves in the consolidated statement of operations.57

(4) We sold an 80% interest in 131-137 Spring Street and have subsequently accounted for our interest in the properties as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures. See Note 5, "Debt, Preferred Equity and Other Investments."

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

Additionally, amounts do not include adjustments for expenses recorded in subsequent periods.


(3)	Gain/(loss) on sale includes a $10.0 million charge that was recorded during the third quarter of 2015. This charge is included in depreciable real estate reserves in the consolidated statement of operations.


(4)	We sold an 80% interest in 131-137 Spring Street and have subsequently accounted for our interest in the properties as an investment in unconsolidated joint ventures. See Note 5, "Debt, Preferred Equity and Other Investments."

Discontinued Operations

The Company adopted ASU 2014-08 effective January 1, 2015 which raised the threshold for disposals to qualify as discontinued operations to include only dispositions that represent a strategic shift in an entity’s operations. The guidance was applied prospectively for new disposals. As a result, the Company classified 140 Grand Street in White Plains, New York as held for sale as of September 30, 2015 and 131-137 Spring Street as of June 30, 2015, and included the results of operations in continuing operations for all periods presented. Discontinued operations included the results of operations of real estate assets sold or held for sale prior to January 1, 2015. This included 673 First Avenue, which was sold induring May 2014 ~~and 333 West 34th Street, which was sold in August 2013~~.

~~There were no discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.~~ The following table summarizes net income from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2016, 2015, and ~~2013~~2014 (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,		~~Year Ended December 31,~~
			2014				2013
	2016				2015				2014
Revenues
Rental revenue	$	—	$	~~7,853~~	$	—	$	~~28,843~~	$	7,853
Escalation and reimbursement revenues	—		~~1,080~~		—		~~4,093~~		1,080
Other income	—		—		—		8		—
Total revenues	—		~~8,933~~		—		~~32,944~~		8,933
Operating expenses	—		~~1,222~~		—		~~6,733~~		1,222
Real estate taxes	—		~~1,402~~		—		~~4,571~~		1,402
Ground rent	—		~~3,001~~		—		~~7,974~~		3,001
Interest expense, net of interest income	—		~~879~~		—		~~2,933~~		879
Depreciation and amortization	—		~~433~~		—		~~4,826~~		433
Total expenses	—		~~6,937~~		—		~~27,037~~		6,937
Net income from discontinued operations	$	—	$	~~1,996~~	$	—	$	~~5,907~~	$	1,996

5. Debt, and Preferred Equity ~~and Other~~ Investments

During the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, our debt and preferred equity investments, net of discounts and deferred origination fees, increased $~~781.4~~1,015 million and $~~680.1~~781 million, respectively, due to originations, purchases, advances under future funding obligations, discount and fee amortization, and paid-in-kind interest, net of premium amortization. We recorded repayments, participations and sales of $~~520.2~~1,045 million and $~~576.1~~520 million during the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively, which offset the increases in debt and preferred equity investments.

Debt Investments

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we held the following debt investments with an aggregate weighted average current yield of 109.2334% at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands):

Loan Type	December 31, ~~2015Future~~2016Future FundingObligations		December 31, ~~2015SeniorFinancing~~2016SeniorFinancing		December 31, ~~2015Carrying~~2016Carrying Value (1)		December 31, ~~2014Carrying~~2015Carrying Value (1)		~~InitialMaturityDate~~MaturityDate (2)
							(as adjusted)
Fixed Rate Investments:
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan(2)(3)	$	—	$	—	$	23,510	$	45,611	May 2016
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan (3)	$	—	$	1,109,000	$	193,422	$	104,661	March 2017
Jr. Mortgage Participation	—		133,000		49,000		49,000		June 2016
Mezzanine Loan(4a)	—		502,100		66,129		41,115		June 2017
Mezzanine Loan	—		115,000		24,916		24,910		July 2016
Mortgage Loan(5)	—		—		26,311		26,262		February 2019
Mezzanine Loan	—		165,000		72,102		71,656		November 2016
Mortgage Loan	—		—		380		513		August 2019
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan	—		1,109,000		104,661		98,934		March 2017
Mezzanine Loan(3)	—		—		66,183		65,770		March 2017
Mezzanine Loan(4)	—		502,100		41,115		24,608		June 2017

5658

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

Loan Type	December 31, ~~2015Future~~2016Future FundingObligations		December 31, ~~2015SeniorFinancing~~2016SeniorFinancing		December 31, ~~2015Carrying~~2016Carrying Value (1)		December 31, ~~2014Carrying~~2015Carrying Value (1)		~~InitialMaturityDate~~MaturityDate (2)
							(as adjusted)
Mezzanine Loan	—		539,000		49,691		49,629		July 2018
Mortgage Loan(5)	—		—		26,262		26,209		February 2019
Mortgage Loan	—		—		513		637		August 2019
Mezzanine Loan	—		15,000		3,500		3,500		September 2021
Mezzanine Loan(6)	—		89,880		19,936		19,930		November 2023
Mezzanine Loan(4b)	—		88,466		12,692		19,936		November 2023
Mezzanine Loan(4c)	—		115,000		12,925		24,916		June 2024
Mezzanine Loan	—		95,000		30,000		30,000		January 2025
Mezzanine Loan(7)	—		—		—		14,068
Mezzanine Loan	—		340,000		15,000		—		November 2026
Jr. Mortgage Participation(8)	—		—		—		11,934
Mezzanine Loan(6)	—		—		—		72,102
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan(9)	—		—		—		70,688
Mezzanine Loan(7)	—		—		—		49,691
Total fixed rate	$	—	$	2,762,980	$	511,389	$	607,084
Jr. Mortgage Participation(8)	—		—		—		49,000
Other(8)(9)	—		—		—		23,510
Other(8)(9)	—		—		—		66,183
Total fixed rate	$	—	$	2,264,566	$	360,359	$	511,389
Floating Rate Investments:
Mezzanine Loan(10)	—		775,000		74,700		73,402		March 2016
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(4d)(10)	36,042		—		145,239		134,264		January 2017
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	10,156		—		94,901		—		April 2016
Mezzanine Loan (11)	—		118,949		29,998		28,551		January 2017
Mezzanine Loan(11)	—		160,000		22,625		22,573		June 2016
Mezzanine Loan(4e)(12)	—		40,000		15,369		68,977		June 2017
Mezzanine Loan	7,942		312,939		66,398		—		November 2016
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	—		—		32,847		—		June 2017
Mezzanine Loan	—		360,000		99,530		99,023		November 2016
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	—		—		22,959		22,877		July 2017
Mezzanine Loan(12)	11,414		131,939		49,751		42,750		December 2016
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	—		—		16,960		16,901		September 2017
Mezzanine Loan	281		39,201		13,731		11,835		December 2016
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	3,479		—		20,423		19,282		October 2017
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(13)	57,108		—		134,264		—		January 2017
Mezzanine Loan	—		60,000		14,957		14,904		November 2017
Mezzanine Loan	1,293		118,949		28,551		20,651		January 2017
Mezzanine Loan(4f)	—		85,000		15,141		29,505		December 2017
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	—		—		68,977		—		June 2017
Mezzanine Loan(4g)	—		65,000		14,656		28,563		December 2017
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan	1,257		118,717		40,346		38,524		July 2017
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(4h)	795		—		15,051		14,942		December 2017
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	—		—		22,877		22,803		July 2017
Jr. Mortgage Participation	—		40,000		19,913		19,846		April 2018
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	—		—		16,901		16,848		September 2017
Mezzanine Loan	—		175,000		34,844		34,725		April 2018
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	4,500		—		19,282		—		October 2017
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(13)	523		20,523		10,863		31,210		August 2018
Mezzanine Loan	—		60,000		14,904		14,859		November 2017
Mortgage Loan	—		—		19,840		—		August 2018
Mezzanine Loan	—		8565,000		2914,~~505~~880		—		~~December~~August ~~2017~~2018
Mezzanine Loan	—		6537,~~000~~500		2814,~~563~~648		—		~~December~~September ~~2017~~2018
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(14)	795		—		14,942		14,845		December 2017
Mezzanine Loan	2,324		45,025		34,502		—		October 2018
Jr. Mortgage Participation	—		40,000		19,846		—		April 2018
Mezzanine Loan	—		335,000		74,476		—		November 2018
Mezzanine Loan	—		~~175~~33,000		3426,~~725~~850		—26,777		~~April~~December 2018
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan	—		55,000		20,510		20,533		July 2018
Mezzanine Loan	3,317		165,326		56,114		52,774		December 2018
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(15)	1,500		—		31,210		—		August 2018
Mezzanine Loan	15,794		259,229		63,137		49,625		December 2018
Mezzanine Loan	—14,715		33199,~~000~~935		2664,~~777~~505		—		December 2018
Mezzanine Loan	~~6,383~~—		~~156~~45,~~383~~000		5212,~~774~~104		—		~~December~~January ~~2018~~2019
Mezzanine Loan	286,~~801~~383		~~206~~16,~~717~~383		495,~~625~~410		—		~~December~~January ~~2018~~2019
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	—		—		18,395		18,083		February 2019
Mezzanine Loan	—		38,000		21,891		21,845		March 2019
Mezzanine Loan	—		38265,000		2124,~~845~~707		~~21,807~~—		~~March~~April 2019
Mezzanine Loan(16)	—		—		—		33,726
Mortgage/Jr. Mortgage Participation Loan	33,573		183,300		65,554		—		August 2019
Mezzanine Loan(16)	—		—		—		37,322
Mezzanine Loan	2,500		187,500		37,322		—		September 2019
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(17)	—		—		—		109,527
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	82,888		—		111,819		—		September 2019
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan	35,630		—		33,682		—		January 2020

5759

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

Loan Type	December 31, ~~2015Future~~2016Future FundingObligations		December 31, ~~2015SeniorFinancing~~2016SeniorFinancing		December 31, ~~2015Carrying~~2016Carrying Value (1)		December 31, ~~2014Carrying~~2015Carrying Value (1)		~~InitialMaturityDate~~MaturityDate (2)
							(as adjusted)
Mezzanine Loan(14)	32,502		445,483		125,911		—		January 2020
Mezzanine Loan(18)	—		—		—		49,614
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan	—		30,000		15,606		—		July 2021
Total floating rate	$	131,430	$	2,930,845	$	1,116,455	$	668,725
Mezzanine Loan(15)	—		—		—		49,751
Total	$	131,430	$	5,693,825	$	1,627,844	$	1,275,809
Mezzanine Loan(15)	—		—		—		13,731
Mezzanine Loan(16)	—		—		—		99,530
Mortgage/Mezzanine Loan(17)	—		—		—		94,901
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan(6)	—		—		—		20,510
Mezzanine Loan(18)	—		—		—		22,625
Mezzanine Loan(19)	—		—		—		74,700
Mezzanine Loan(20)	—		—		—		66,398
Jr. Mortgage Participation/Mezzanine Loan(8)	—		—		—		18,395
Mezzanine Loan(21)	—		—		—		40,346
Total floating rate	$	270,465	$	2,955,153	$	1,232,178	$	1,116,455
Total	$	270,465	$	5,219,719	$	1,592,537	$	1,627,844

____________________________________________________________________


(1)	Carrying value is net of discounts, premiums, original issue discounts and deferred origination fees.

(2) ~~The~~Represents ~~$22.9~~contractual ~~million junior mortgage participation~~maturity, ~~which~~excluding ~~matures~~any inunexercised ~~February 2016, was sold in July 2015~~options.

(3) ~~These~~This ~~loans~~loan ~~are~~was ~~collateralized~~refinanced at maturity in March 2017 by ~~defeasance~~us ~~securities~~at market rates, and therefore it was not considered a troubled-debt restructuring.

(4) Carrying value is net of ~~$41.3~~the ~~million~~following amount that was participated out, which is included in other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the transfer not meeting the conditions for sale accounting: (a) $41.3 million, (b) $5.0 million, (c) $12.0 million, (d) $36.3 million, (e) $14.5 million, (f) $14.6 million, (g) $14.1 million, and (h) $5.1 million.


(5)	In September 2014, we acquired a $26.4 million mortgage loan at a $0.2 million discount and a $5.7 million junior mortgage participation at a $5.7 million discount. The junior mortgage participation was a nonperforming loan at acquisition and is currently on non-accrual status.

(6) ~~Carrying~~This ~~value~~loan ~~is net of $5.0 million that~~ was ~~participated~~repaid ~~out, which is included~~ in ~~other~~July ~~assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the transfer not meeting the conditions for sale accounting~~2016.

(7) ~~This~~In ~~loan~~April ~~was~~2016 ~~repaid~~we executed a purchase option to acquire a 20% interest in ~~February~~the ~~2015~~underlying asset at a previously agreed upon purchase option valuation, and our mezzanine loan was simultaneously repaid.

(8) This loan was repaid in March ~~2015~~2016.

(9) ~~These~~This ~~loans~~loan ~~were~~was ~~repaid~~collateralized inby ~~December~~defeasance ~~2015~~securities.

(10) InThis ~~March~~loan ~~2016,~~was ~~the~~refinanced at maturity ~~date~~in January 2017 by us at market rates, and therefore it was ~~extended~~not toconsidered ~~September~~a ~~2016~~troubled-debt restructuring.

(11) ~~Carrying~~This ~~value~~loan ~~is net of $7.4 million that~~ was ~~participated~~extended ~~out, which is included~~ in ~~other~~January ~~assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the transfer not meeting the conditions for sale accounting~~2017.

(12) In ~~February~~March ~~2015~~2016, the ~~maturity~~mortgage ~~date~~ was ~~extended to December 2016~~sold.

(13) ~~Carrying~~In ~~value~~January ~~is net of $25.0 million that was participated out~~2016, ~~which is included in other assets and other liabilities on~~ the ~~consolidated~~loans ~~balance~~were ~~sheets~~modified. asIn aMarch ~~result~~2016, of the ~~transfer~~mortgage ~~not~~was ~~meeting the conditions for sale accounting~~sold.

(14) ~~Carrying value is net of~~ $566.1 million ~~that~~of ~~was~~outstanding ~~participated~~principal ~~out,~~was ~~which~~syndicated ~~is included~~ in ~~other~~February ~~assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the transfer not meeting the conditions for sale accounting~~2017.

(15) InThis ~~January~~loan ~~2016,~~was ~~the~~repaid ~~loans~~in ~~were~~December ~~modified and the mortgage was sold~~2016.

(16) ~~These~~This ~~loans~~loan ~~were~~was repaid in ~~April~~November ~~2015~~2016.

(17) This loan was repaid in ~~August~~September ~~2015~~2016.

(18) This loan was repaid in ~~November~~June ~~2015~~2016.


(19)	This loan was repaid in May 2016.


(20)	In March 2016, we contributed our interest in the loan in exchange for a joint venture interest which is now accounted for under the equity method of accounting. It is included in unconsolidated joint ventures on the consolidated balance sheets.


(21)	This loan was repaid in February 2016.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, 2016

Preferred Equity Investments

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we held the following preferred equity investments, with an aggregate weighted average current yield of 78.8616% at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands):

Type	December 31, ~~2015Future~~2016Future FundingObligations		December 31, ~~2015SeniorFinancing~~2016SeniorFinancing		December 31, ~~2015Carrying~~2016Carrying Value (1)		December 31, ~~2014Carrying~~2015Carrying Value (1)		~~InitialMandatoryRedemption~~MandatoryRedemption (2)
Preferred equity(2)	$	—	$	71,486	$	9,967	$	9,954	March 2018
Preferred Equity	$	—	$	71,486	$	9,982	$	9,967	March 2018
Preferred equity	5,580		60,183		32,209		—		November 2018
Preferred Equity	—		58,786		37,893		32,209		November 2018
Preferred equity(3)	—		—		—		123,041
	$	—	$	130,272	$	47,875	$	42,176
	$	5,580	$	131,669	$	42,176	$	132,995

____________________________________________________________________


(1)	Carrying value is net of deferred origination fees.

(2) InRepresents ~~March~~contractual ~~2015~~maturity, ~~the~~excluding ~~redemption~~any ~~date~~unexercised ~~was~~extension ~~extended to March 2018~~options.

~~(3)~~The ~~This~~following ~~investment~~table ~~was~~is ~~redeemed~~a inrollforward ~~July~~of our total loan loss reserves at December 31, 2016, 2015. and 2014 (in thousands):



	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Balance at beginning of year	$	—	$	—	$	1,000
Expensed	—		—		—
Recoveries	—		—		—
Charge-offs and reclassifications	—		—		(1,000		)
Balance at end of period	$	—	$	—	$	—

At December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, all debt and preferred equity investments were performing in accordance with the terms of the relevant investments, with the exception of the junior mortgage participation acquired in September 2014, which has a carrying value of zero discussed in subnote 4 of the Debt Investments table above.

We have determined that we have one portfolio segment of financing receivables at December 31, 2016 and 2015 comprising commercial real estate which is primarily recorded in debt and preferred equity investments. Included in other assets is an additional amount of financing receivables totaling $144.5 million and $168.3 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. No financing receivables were 90 days past due at December 31, 2016.

6. Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

We have investments in several real estate joint ventures with various partners. As of December 31, 2016 none of our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are VIEs. The table below provides general information on each of our joint ventures as of December 31, 2016:



Property	Partner	Ownership Interest ⁽¹⁾	Economic Interest ⁽¹⁾	Approximate Square Feet	Acquisition Date ⁽²⁾	Acquisition Price ⁽²⁾ (in thousands)
131-137 Spring Street	Invesco Real Estate	20.00%	20.00%	68,342	August 2015	$	277,750
76 11th Avenue ⁽³⁾	Oxford/Vornado	33.33%	35.09%	764,000	March 2016	138,240


(1)	Ownership interest and economic interest represent the Company's interests in the joint venture as of December 31, 2016. Changes in ownership or economic interests within the current year are disclosed in the notes below.


(2)	Acquisition date and price represent the date on which the Company initially acquired an interest in the joint venture and the actual or implied gross purchase price for the joint venture on that date. Acquisition date and price are not adjusted for subsequent acquisitions or dispositions of interest.

(3)

The joint venture owns two mezzanine notes secured by interests in the entity that owns 76 11th Avenue. The difference between our ownership interest and our economic interest results from our right to 50% of the total exit fee while each of our partners is entitled to receive 25% of the total exit fee and our right to 38% of the total extension fee while each of our partners is entitled to receive 31% of the total extension fee.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~The following table is a rollforward of our total loan loss reserves at December 31~~Acquisition, ~~2015,~~Development ~~2014~~ and ~~2013~~Construction ~~(in thousands):~~Arrangement

	Year Ended December 31,
	2015		2014			2013
Balance at beginning of year	$	—	$	1,000		$	7,000
Expensed	—		—			—
Recoveries	—		—			—
Charge-offs and reclassifications	—		(1,000		)	(6,000		)
Balance at end of period	$	—	$	—		$	1,000

Based on the characteristics of the following arrangements, which are similar to those of an investment, combined with the expected residual profit of not greater than 50%, we have accounted for these debt and preferred equity investments under the equity method. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the carrying value for acquisition, development and construction arrangements were as follows (in thousands):

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, all debt and preferred equity investments were performing in accordance with the terms of the relevant investments, with the exception of a junior mortgage participation acquired in September 2014, which has a carrying value of zero.



Loan Type	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015		Maturity Date
Mezzanine Loan and Preferred Equity ⁽¹⁾	$	100,000	$	99,936	March 2017
Mezzanine Loan ⁽²⁾	24,542		—		July 2036
	$	124,542	$	99,936

We(1) ~~have~~This ~~determined~~loan ~~that~~was weextended ~~have one portfolio segment of financing receivables at December 31, 2015 and 2014 comprising commercial real estate which is primarily recorded~~ in ~~debt~~March ~~and preferred equity investments~~2017. Included in other assets is an additional amount of financing receivables totaling $168.3 million and $107.0 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. No financing receivables were 90 days past due at December 31, 2015.

~~Other~~(2) ~~Investments~~The Company has the ability to convert this loan into an equity position starting in 2021 and the borrower is able to force this conversion in 2024.

~~Other~~Sale ~~investments~~of ~~pertain~~Joint toVenture ~~investments~~Interest ~~accounted~~or ~~for under the equity method of accounting.~~Property

We ~~have~~did ~~one~~not ~~debt~~sell ~~and~~any ~~preferred~~joint ~~equity~~venture ~~investment~~interest ~~which~~or ~~meets~~property ~~the~~during ~~criteria of a real estate investment under~~ the ~~guidance~~year ~~for~~ended ~~Acquisition, Development and Construction arrangements and have accounted for this wholly owned investment under the equity method of accounting. As of~~ December 31, ~~2015 and 2014, the book value of this investment was $100.2 million and $100.0 million, respectively. In January~~ 2016 ~~the maturity date of this investment was extended from March 2016 to March 2017, subject to two remaining one-year extension options and a two-year option for the last extension~~.

~~During~~Joint ~~the~~Venture ~~three~~Mortgages ~~months~~and ~~ended~~Other ~~March~~Loans 31, 2014, we sold our 43.74% economic ownership interest in the joint venture which holds the West Coast Office portfolio at an implied gross valuation of $756.0 million, inclusive of the $526.3 million mortgage encumbering the property. We recognized a gain of $85.6 million on the sale of our investment.Payable

AsWe ofgenerally ~~December 31,~~finance ~~2015,~~our wejoint ~~have~~ventures ~~one~~with ~~investment~~non-recourse indebt. aIn ~~real~~certain ~~estate~~cases ~~joint~~we ~~venture~~have inprovided ~~which~~guarantees weor domaster ~~not~~leases ~~control~~for astenant aspace, ~~result~~which ofterminate upon the ~~level~~satisfaction of ~~our~~specified ~~voting~~circumstances ~~interest~~or repayment of the underlying loans. The ~~following~~first ~~table~~mortgage ~~provides~~notes ~~general~~and ~~information~~other onloans ~~our~~payable collateralized by the respective joint venture asproperties and assignment of leases at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Property	~~Partner~~	~~Ownership~~Maturity ~~Interest~~Date	~~Economic Interest~~	~~Approximate~~InterestRate ~~Square Feet~~ (~~unaudited~~1)	~~Acquisition Date~~	~~Acquisition Price(1)(in thousands)~~	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
131-137 Spring Street(2)	Invesco Real Estate	20%	20%	68,342	August 2015	$	277,750
Floating Rate Debt:
131-137 Spring Street		August 2020		2.03	%		$	141,000		$	141,000
Total joint venture mortgages and other loans payable							$	141,000		$	141,000
Deferred financing costs, net							(3,970		)	(5,077		)
Total joint venture mortgages and other loans payable, net							$	137,030		$	135,923

(1) ~~Acquisition~~Effective ~~price~~weighted ~~represents~~average ~~the~~interest ~~actual~~rate orfor ~~implied~~the ~~gross~~year ~~purchase~~ended ~~price~~December ~~for~~31, ~~the joint venture~~2016, ~~which~~taking isinto ~~not~~account ~~adjusted~~interest ~~for~~rate ~~subsequent~~hedges ~~acquisitions~~in ofeffect ~~additional~~during ~~interest~~the period.

~~(2)~~The Incombined ~~August~~balance ~~2015,~~sheets wefor ~~sold an 80% interest in 131-137 Spring Street and through~~ the unconsolidated joint ~~venture obtained a $141.0 million 5-year~~ventures, ~~floating rate mortgage financing, which bears interest~~ at ~~155 basis points over the 30-day LIBOR. These properties~~December 31, ~~which~~2016 ~~were~~and ~~previously wholly-owned~~December 31, ~~were~~2015 ~~accounted~~are ~~for~~as follows (in ~~commercial real estate properties on the consolidated balance sheet. See Note 4, "Property Dispositions."~~thousands):



	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Assets
Commercial real estate property, net	$	279,451	$	285,689
Debt and preferred equity investments, net	273,749		99,936
Other assets	18,922		16,897
Total assets	$	572,122	$	402,522
Liabilities and members' equity
Mortgages and other loans payable, net	$	137,030	$	135,923
Other liabilities	22,185		25,462
Members' equity	412,907		241,137
Total liabilities and members' equity	$	572,122	$	402,522
Company's investments in unconsolidated joint ventures	$	174,127	$	100,192

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

6.The ~~Mortgages~~combined statements of operations for the unconsolidated joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and ~~Other~~2014 ~~Loans~~are ~~Payable~~as follows (in thousands):

The first mortgages and other loans payable collateralized by either the respective properties and assignment of leases or certain debt investments at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, were as follows (amounts in thousands):



	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Total revenues	$	38,524	$	19,855	$	7,121
Operating expenses	1,238		1,686		59
Real estate taxes	1,192		1,262		—
Interest expense, net of interest income	2,895		1,070		—
Amortization of deferred financing costs	1,108		462		—
Transaction related costs	—		5,262		181
Depreciation and amortization	8,404		3,207		—
Total expenses	$	14,837	$	12,949	$	240
Net income	$	23,687	$	6,906	$	6,881
Company's equity in net income from unconsolidated joint ventures	14,509		8,841		4,491

Property	Maturity Date	Interest Rate(1)		December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Fixed Rate Debt:						(as adjusted)
919 Third Avenue(2)	June 2023	5.12	%	$	500,000	$	500,000
711 Third Avenue(3)				—		120,000
Total fixed rate debt				500,000		620,000
Floating Rate Debt:
Master Repurchase Agreement	June 2016	3.36	%	$	253,424	$	100,000
Total floating rate debt				253,424		100,000
Total fixed and floating rate debt				$	753,424	$	720,000

7. Mortgages and Other Loans Payable

~~(1)~~The ~~Effective~~first ~~weighted~~mortgages ~~average~~and ~~interest~~other ~~rate~~loans ~~for~~payable collateralized by the ~~year~~respective ~~ended~~properties ~~December~~and assignment of leases at December 31, 2016 and 2015., respectively, were as follows (amounts in thousands):



Property	Maturity Date	Interest Rate ⁽¹⁾		December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Fixed Rate Debt:
919 Third Avenue ⁽²⁾	June 2023	5.12	%	$	500,000		$	500,000
Floating Rate Debt:
Master Repurchase Agreement	July 2018	3.04	%	$	184,642		$	253,424
Total mortgages and other loans payable				$	684,642		$	753,424
Deferred financing costs, net of amortization				(8,574		)	(7,696		)
Total fixed and floating rate debt				$	676,068		$	745,728

____________________________________________________________________


(1)	Effective weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2016.


(2)	We own a 51.0% controlling interest in the joint venture that is the borrower on this loan.

(3) In March 2015, we repaid the mortgage.

Master Repurchase Agreement

~~The~~In ~~Master~~July ~~Repurchase Agreement~~2016, aswe ~~amended~~entered ininto ~~December~~a ~~2013~~restated Master Repurchase Agreement, or MRA, which provides us with the ability to sell certain debt investments with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the same at a certain date or on demand. ~~This~~The MRA has a maximum facility capacity of $300.0 million and bears interest ranging from ~~250~~ ~~basis points~~225 and ~~325~~ 400 basis points over 30-day LIBOR depending on the pledged collateral. ~~In September~~Since ~~2015, we entered into an amendment to the MRA to extend the maturity to June 29, 2016. Further, as of~~ December 6, 2015, we ~~are~~have ~~now~~been required to pay monthly in arrears a 25 basis point fee on the excess of $150.0 million over the average daily balance during the period if the average daily balance is less than $150.0 million. We seek to mitigate risks associated with our repurchase agreement by managing the credit quality of our assets, early repayments, interest rate volatility, liquidity, and market value. The margin call provisions under our repurchase facility permit valuation adjustments based on capital markets activity, and are not limited to collateral-specific credit marks. To monitor credit risk associated with our debt investments, our asset management team regularly reviews our investment portfolio and is in contact with our borrowers in order to monitor the collateral and enforce our rights as necessary. The risk associated with potential margin calls is further mitigated by our ability to recollateralize the facility with additional assets from our portfolio of debt investments, our ability to satisfy margin calls with cash or cash equivalents and access to additional liquidity through the 2012 ~~Credit~~credit ~~Facility. See Note 7~~facility, ~~"Corporate~~as ~~Indebtedness~~defined below."

At December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, the gross book value of the properties and debt and preferred equity investments collateralizing the mortgages and other loans payable, not including assets held for sale, was approximately $21.07 billion and $12.90 billion, respectively.

~~7. Corporate Indebtedness~~63

2012 Credit Facility

In July 2015, we entered into the third amendment to the credit facility that was originally entered into by the Company in November 2012, referred to as the 2012 credit facility, which increased our unsecured corporate facility by $500.0 million. The revolving credit facility was increased by $400.0 million to $1.6 billion and the term loan portion of the facility was increased by $100.0 million to $933.0 million.

In January 2015, we amended the 2012 credit facility by entering into a second amended and restated credit agreement, which decreased the interest-rate margin and facility fee applicable to the revolving credit facility by 20 basis points and five basis points, respectively, and extended the maturity date of the revolving credit facility to March 29, 2019 with an as-of-right extension through March 29, 2020.

In November 2014, we increased the term loan portion of the facility by $50.0 million to $833.0 million.

In March 2014, we entered into an amendment to the 2012 credit facility, which among other things, increased the term loan portion of the facility by $383.0 million to $783.0 million, decreased the interest-rate margin applicable to the term loan portion of the facility by 25 basis points and extended the maturity of the term loan portion of the facility from March 30, 2018 to June 30, 2019.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~As of December 31, 2015, the 2012 credit facility, as amended, consisted of a $1~~8.6 ~~billion~~Corporate revolving credit facility, or the revolving credit facility, and a $933.0 million term loan, or the term loan facility. We also have an option, subject to customary conditions, to increase the capacity under the revolving credit facility to $3.0 billion at any time prior to the maturity date for the revolving credit facility without the consent of existing lenders, by obtaining additional commitments from our existing lenders and other financial institutions. Indebtedness

~~As of December 31, 2015, the~~ 2012 ~~credit~~Credit facility bore interest at a spread over LIBOR ranging from (i) 87.5 basis points to 155 basis points for loans under the revolving credit facility and (ii) 95 basis points to 190 basis points for loans under the term loan facility, in each case based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP. At December 31, 2015, the applicable spread was 125 basis points for revolving credit facility and 140 basis points for the term loan facility. At December 31, 2015, the effective interest rate was 1.45% for the revolving credit facility and 1.67% for the term loan facility. We are required to pay quarterly in arrears a 12.5 basis points to 30 basis point facility fee on the total commitments under the revolving credit facility based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP. As of December 31, 2015, the facility fee was 25 basis points. As of December 31, 2015, we had $73.1 million of outstanding letters of credit, $994.0 million drawn under the revolving credit facility and $933.0 million outstanding under the term loan facility, with total undrawn capacity of $532.9 million under the 2012 credit facility.Facility

In August 2016, we entered into an amendment to the credit facility that was originally entered into by the Company in November 2012, referred to as the 2012 credit facility. As of December 31, 2016, the 2012 credit facility, as amended, consisted of a $1.6 billion revolving credit facility and a $1.2 billion term loan, with a maturity date of March 29, 2019 and June 30, 2019, respectively. The revolving credit facility has an as-of-right extension to March 29, 2020. We also have an option, subject to customary conditions, to increase the capacity under the revolving credit facility to $3.0 billion at any time prior to the maturity date for the revolving credit facility without the consent of existing lenders, by obtaining additional commitments from our existing lenders and other financial institutions.

As of December 31, 2016, the 2012 credit facility bore interest at a spread over LIBOR ranging from (i) 87.5 basis points to 155 basis points for loans under the revolving credit facility and (ii) 95 basis points to 190 basis points for loans under the term loan facility, in each case based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP.

At December 31, 2016, the applicable spread was 125 basis points for the revolving credit facility and 140 basis points for the term loan facility. At December 31, 2016, the effective interest rate was 1.78% for the revolving credit facility and 1.96% for the term loan facility. We are required to pay quarterly in arrears a 12.5 basis points to 30 basis point facility fee on the total commitments under the revolving credit facility based on the credit rating assigned to the senior unsecured long term indebtedness of ROP. As of December 31, 2016, the facility fee was 25 basis points.

As of December 31, 2016, we had $56.5 million of outstanding letters of credit, zero drawn under the revolving credit facility and $1.2 billion outstanding under the term loan facility, with total undrawn capacity of $1.5 billion under the 2012 credit facility. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the revolving credit facility had a carrying value of $(6.3) million, representing deferred financing costs presented within other liabilities, and $985.1 million, respectively, net of deferred financing costs. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the term loan facility had a carrying value of $1.2 billion and $929.5 million, respectively, net of deferred financing costs.

The 2012 credit facility includes certain restrictions and covenants (see Restrictive Covenants below).

Senior Unsecured Notes

Issuance	December 31, ~~2015Unpaid~~2016Unpaid Principal Balance		December 31, ~~2015Accreted~~2016Accreted Balance			December 31, ~~2014Accreted~~2015Accreted Balance			CouponRate (1)		EffectiveRate		Term(in Years)	Maturity Date
March 31, 2006(2)	$	255,308	$	255,296		$	255,250		6.00	%	6.00	%	10	March 31, 2016
August 5, 2011 (2)	$	250,000	$	249,880		$	249,810		5.00	%	5.00	%	7	August 2018
August 5, 2011(3)	250,000		249,810			249,744			5.00	%	5.00	%	7	August 15, 2018
March 16, 2010 (2)	250,000		250,000			250,000			7.75	%	7.75	%	10	March 2020
March 16, 2010(3)	250,000		250,000			250,000			7.75	%	7.75	%	10	March 15, 2020
November 15, 2012 (2)	200,000		200,000			200,000			4.50	%	4.50	%	10	December 2022
November 15, 2012(3)	200,000		200,000			200,000			4.50	%	4.50	%	10	December 1, 2022
December 17, 2015 (2)	100,000		100,000			100,000			4.27	%	4.27	%	10	December 2025
December 15, 2015(3)	100,000		100,000			—			4.27	%	4.27	%	10	December 17, 2025
March 31, 2006 (3)	—		—			255,296
June 27, 2005(4)	—		—			7
	$	800,000	$	799,880		$	1,055,106
	$	1,055,308	$	1,055,106		$	955,001
Deferred financing costs, net			(4,620		)	(5,303		)
	$	800,000	$	795,260		$	1,049,803

______________________________________________________________________


(1)	Interest on the senior unsecured notes is payable semi-annually with principal and unpaid interest due on the scheduled maturity dates.

(2) ~~The~~Issued ~~notes~~by ~~will~~SL beGreen, ~~repaid~~the atOperating ~~maturity~~Partnership and ROP, as co-obligors.

(3) ~~Issued~~This bynote SLwas ~~Green,~~repaid ~~the~~in ~~Operating~~March ~~Partnership and ROP, as co-obligors~~2016.

(4) In April 2015, we redeemed the remaining outstanding debentures.

ROP also provides a guaranty of the Operating Partnership's obligations under its 3.00% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2017.

~~Restrictive Covenants~~64

The terms of the 2012 credit facility, as amended, and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit, among other things, SL Green's ability to pay dividends, make certain types of investments, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets, and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value, a minimum ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value. The dividend restriction referred to above provides that SL Green will not during any time when a default is continuing, make distributions with respect to SL Green's common stock or other equity interests, except to enable SL Green to continue to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

Restrictive Covenants

The terms of the 2012 credit facility, as amended, and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit, among other things, SL Green's ability to pay dividends, make certain types of investments, incur additional indebtedness, incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and dispose of assets, and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to the maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value, a minimum ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges, a maximum ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value. The dividend restriction referred to above provides that SL Green will not during any time when a default is continuing, make distributions with respect to SL Green's common stock or other equity interests, except to enable SL Green to continue to qualify as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

Principal Maturities

Combined aggregate principal maturities of our mortgage and other loans payable, 2012 credit facility and senior unsecured notes as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, including as-of-right extension options and put options, were as follows (in thousands):

	ScheduledAmortization		PrincipalRepayments		RevolvingCreditFacility		Unsecured Term Loan		SeniorUnsecuredNotes		Total
2016	$	3,566	$	253,424	$	—	$	—	$	255,308	$	512,298
2017	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2017	7,411		—		—		—		—		7,411
2018	—		184,642		—		—		250,000		$	434,642
2018	7,799		—		—		—		250,000		257,799
2019	—		—		—		1,183,000		—		$	1,183,000
2019	8,207		—		—		933,000		—		941,207
2020	—		—		—		—		250,000		$	250,000
2020	8,637		—		994,000		—		250,000		1,252,637
2021	—		—		—		—		—		$	—
Thereafter	~~22,786~~—		~~441~~500,~~594~~000		—		—		300,000		~~764,380~~$	800,000
	$	~~58,406~~—	$	~~695~~684,~~018~~642	$	~~994,000~~—	$	~~933~~1,183,000	$	1800,~~055,308~~000	$	32,~~735~~667,~~732~~642

Consolidated interest expense, excluding capitalized interest, was comprised of the following (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
	2016			2015			2014
				(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)
Interest expense before capitalized interest	$	110,393		$	120,467		$	133,180
Interest expense	$	119,360		$	129,427		$	133,853
Interest capitalized	(1,171		)	(1,107		)	(3,753		)
Interest income	(1814		)	(7118		)	(871		)
Interest expense, net	$	~~119~~109,~~342~~208		$	~~129~~119,~~356~~342		$	~~133~~129,~~845~~356
Interest capitalized	$	1,107		$	3,753		$	—

89. Preferred Units

Through a consolidated subsidiary, we have authorized up to 109,161 3.5% Series A Preferred Units of limited partnership interest, or the ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series A Preferred Units, with a liquidation preference of $1,000.00 per unit. In August 2015, the Company issued 109,161 ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series A Preferred Units in conjunction with an acquisition. The ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series A Preferred unitholders receive annual dividends of $35.00 per unit paid on a quarterly basis and dividends are cumulative, subject to certain provisions. The ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series A Preferred Units can be redeemed at any time, at the option of the unitholder, either for cash or are convertible on a one-for-one basis, into the Series B Preferred Units of limited partnership interest, or the ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series B Preferred Units. The ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series B Preferred Units can be converted at any time, at the option of the unitholder, into a number of common stock equal to 6.71348 shares of SL Green common stock for each ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series B Preferred Unit. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, no ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series B Preferred Units have been issued.

ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging requires bifurcation of certain embedded derivative instruments, such as conversion features in convertible equity instruments, and their measurement at fair value for accounting purposes. The conversion feature embedded in the ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series A Preferred Units was evaluated, and it was determined that the conversion feature should be bifurcated from its host instrument and accounted for as a freestanding derivative. The derivative is reported as a derivative liability in accrued interest and other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and is adjusted to its fair value at each reporting date, with a corresponding adjustment to interest expense, net of interest income. The embedded derivative for the ~~Greene~~Subsidiary Series A Preferred Units was initially recorded at a fair value of zero on July 22, 2015, the date of issuance. At ~~December 31, 2015, the carrying amount of the derivative was adjusted to its fair value of zero, with a corresponding adjustment to preferred units and interest expense, net of interest income.~~

~~9. Partners' Capital~~65

Since consummation of the Merger on January 25, 2007, the Operating Partnership has owned all the economic interests in ROP either by direct ownership or by indirect ownership through our general partner, which is its wholly-owned subsidiary.

Intercompany transactions between SL Green and ROP are generally recorded as contributions and distributions.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

~~10.~~December 31, ~~Fair~~2016, ~~Value~~the ~~Measurements~~carrying amount of the derivative was adjusted to its fair value of zero, with a corresponding adjustment to preferred units and interest expense, net of interest income.

We are required to disclose fair value information with regard to our financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, for which it is practical to estimate fair value10. ~~The~~Partners' ~~FASB~~Capital guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We measure and/or disclose the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on a hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions. This hierarchy consist of three broad levels: Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date; Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are used when little or no market data is available. We follow this hierarchy for our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis. In instances in which the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of the particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Intercompany transactions between SL Green and ROP are generally recorded as contributions and distributions.

11. Fair Value Measurements

We are required to disclose fair value information with regard to our financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, for which it is practical to estimate fair value. The FASB guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We measure and/or disclose the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on a hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions. This hierarchy consists of three broad levels: Level 1 - quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date; Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are used when little or no market data is available. We follow this hierarchy for our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis. In instances in which the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of the particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

We determine other than temporary impairment in real estate investments and debt and preferred equity investments, including intangibles utilizing cash flow projections that apply, among other things, estimated revenue and expense growth rates, discount rates and capitalization rates, which are classified as Level 3 inputs.

The fair value of derivative instruments is based on current market data received from financial sources that trade such instruments and are based on prevailing market data and derived from third party proprietary models based on well-recognized financial principles and reasonable estimates about relevant future market conditions, which are classified as Level 2 inputs.

The financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, debt and preferred equity investments, mortgages and other loans payable and other secured and unsecured debt. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses reported in our consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value due to the short term nature of these instruments. The fair value of debt and preferred equity investments, which is classified as Level 3, is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans with the same maturities would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings. The fair value of borrowings, which is classified as Level 3, is estimated by discounting the contractual cash flows of each debt instrument to their present value using adjusted market interest rates, which is provided by a third-party specialist.

The following table provides the carrying value and fair value of these financial instruments as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 (in thousands):

	December 31, 2015					December 31, 2014
	December 31, 2016					December 31, 2015
	Carrying Value			Fair Value		Carrying Value			Fair Value
	Carrying Value (1)			Fair Value		Carrying Value (1)			Fair Value
						(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)
Debt and preferred equity investments (2)	$	1,640,412		(3)		$	1,670,020		(3)
Debt and preferred equity investments	$	1,670,020	(1)	(2)		$	1,408,804	(1)	(2)
Fixed rate debt	$	2,099,880		$	2,183,042	$	1,585,106		$	1,663,078
Fixed rate debt	$	1,585,106		$	1,663,078	$	1,605,001		$	1,737,673
Variable rate debt	567,642			580,083		2,150,424			2,164,673
Variable rate debt	2,150,424			2,164,673		1,288,000			1,331,177
	$	2,667,522		$	2,763,125	$	3,735,530		$	3,827,751
	$	3,735,530		$	3,827,751	$	2,893,001		$	3,068,850

______________________________________________________________________

(1) ~~Excludes~~Amounts ~~one~~exclude ~~investment~~net ~~with~~deferred afinancing ~~book value of $100~~costs.2 million and $100.0 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which we accounted for under the equity method accounting as a result of meeting the criteria of a real estate investment under the guidance for Acquisition, Development and Construction arrangements, and other investments with a book value of $168.3 million and $107.0 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

(2) At December 31, 2015, debt and preferred equity investments had an estimated fair value ranging between $1.7 billion and $1.8 billion. At December 31, 2014, debt and preferred equity investments had an estimated fair value ranging between $1.5 billion and $1.8 billion.66

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments was based on pertinent information available to us as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Although we are not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the reasonable fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

Table of Contents

Reckson Operation Partnership, L.P.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (cont.)

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

11(2) Excludes investment with a book value of $174.1 ~~Financial~~million ~~Instruments:~~and ~~Derivatives~~$100.2 million as of December 31, 2016 and ~~Hedging~~2015, respectively, which we accounted for under the equity method accounting as a result of meeting the criteria of a real estate investment under the guidance for Acquisition, Development and Construction arrangements, and other investments with a book value of $144.5 million and $168.3 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In(3) ~~the~~At ~~normal~~December ~~course of business~~31, ~~we use a variety of commonly used derivative instruments~~2016, ~~such~~debt ~~as interest rate swaps, caps, collar~~ and ~~floors,~~preferred toequity ~~manage,~~investments orhad ~~hedge~~an ~~interest~~estimated ~~rate~~fair ~~risk.~~value Weranging ~~hedge~~between ~~our exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions in addition to anticipated future interest payments on existing debt~~$1.6 Webillion ~~recognize~~and ~~all derivatives on the balance sheets at fair value~~$1.8 ~~Derivatives that are not hedges are adjusted to fair value through earnings~~billion. IfAt aDecember ~~derivative is a hedge~~31, ~~depending on the nature of the hedge~~2015, ~~changes~~debt inand ~~the~~preferred ~~fair~~equity ~~value~~investments ofhad ~~the~~an ~~derivative~~estimated ~~will either be offset against the change in~~ fair value ofranging ~~the~~between ~~hedge asset, liability, or firm commitment through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings~~$1.7 ~~The~~billion ~~ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. Reported net income~~ and capital may increase or decrease prospectively, depending on future levels of interest rates and other variables affecting the fair values of derivative instruments and hedged items, but will have no effect on cash flows$1.8 ~~Currently, all of our designated derivative instruments are effective hedging instruments~~billion.

AsDisclosure ofabout ~~December 31,~~fair ~~2015,~~value ~~the~~of ~~Company~~financial ~~had~~instruments ~~designated~~was anbased ~~interest~~on ~~swap~~pertinent ~~agreement~~information onavailable ~~$30.0~~to ~~million~~us as of ~~the~~December 31, ~~2012~~2016 ~~credit~~and ~~facility~~2015. ~~The~~Although ~~following~~we ~~table~~are ~~summarizes~~not ~~the~~aware ~~notional and fair value~~ of ~~our~~any ~~derivative~~factors ~~financial~~that ~~instrument~~would atsignificantly ~~December 31,~~affect ~~2015~~the ~~based~~reasonable onfair ~~Level~~value 2amounts, ~~inputs.~~such ~~The~~amounts ~~notional~~have ~~value~~not isbeen ancomprehensively ~~indication~~revalued offor ~~the~~purposes ~~extent~~ of ~~our~~these ~~involvement~~financial instatements since that ~~instrument~~date atand ~~that~~current ~~time,~~estimates ~~but~~of ~~does~~fair ~~not~~value ~~represent~~may ~~exposure~~differ tosignificantly ~~credit,~~from ~~interest~~the ~~rate~~amounts orpresented ~~market risks~~herein.

NotionalValue

StrikeRate

EffectiveDate

ExpirationDate

Balance Sheet Location

FairValue

Interest Rate Swap

$30,000

2.295%

July 2010

June 2016

Other Liabilities

(241

)

12. Financial Instruments: Derivatives and Hedging

~~Gains~~In the normal course of business, we use a variety of commonly used derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, caps, collar and ~~losses~~floors, onto ~~terminated~~manage, ~~hedges~~or ~~are~~hedge ~~included~~interest rate risk. We hedge our exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions in addition to anticipated future interest payments on existing debt. We recognize all derivatives on the ~~accumulated~~balance ~~other~~sheets ~~comprehensive~~at ~~loss,~~fair ~~and~~value. Derivatives that are ~~recognized~~not ~~into~~hedges are adjusted to fair value through earnings. ~~over~~If a derivative is a hedge, depending on the ~~term~~nature of the ~~related~~hedge, ~~senior~~changes ~~unsecured~~in ~~notes.~~the Asfair value of ~~December 31,~~the ~~2015~~derivative ~~and~~will ~~2014,~~either be offset against the ~~deferred~~change ~~net~~in ~~losses~~fair ~~from~~value ~~these~~of ~~terminated~~the ~~hedges~~hedge asset, ~~which~~liability, ~~are~~or ~~included~~firm incommitment ~~accumulated~~through earnings, or recognized in other comprehensive ~~loss~~income ~~relating~~until tothe hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. Reported net ~~unrealized~~income ~~loss~~and equity may increase or decrease prospectively, depending on future levels of interest rates and other variables affecting the fair values of derivative ~~instrument~~instruments and hedged items, ~~was~~but ~~approximately~~will $2have no effect on cash flows.0 ~~million~~Currently, ~~and~~all $2of our designated derivative instruments are effective hedging instruments.3 ~~million~~As of December 31, ~~respectively~~2016, the Company had not designated any interest rate swap agreements on any debt investment.

~~Over~~Gains ~~time, the realized~~ and ~~unrealized~~losses ~~gains~~on ~~and~~terminated ~~losses~~hedges ~~held~~are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, ~~will~~and beare ~~reclassified~~recognized into earnings asover anthe ~~adjustment~~term toof ~~interest expense in~~ the ~~same~~related ~~periods~~senior inunsecured ~~which~~notes. ~~the~~As ~~hedged~~of ~~interest~~December 31, ~~payments~~2016 ~~affect~~and ~~earnings.~~2015, Wethe ~~estimate~~deferred ~~that~~net ~~approximately~~losses ~~$0.6~~from ~~million~~these ofterminated ~~the~~hedges, ~~current~~which ~~balance~~are ~~held~~included in accumulated other comprehensive loss ~~will~~relating beto ~~reclassified~~net ~~into~~unrealized ~~interest~~loss ~~expense~~on ~~within~~derivative ~~the~~instruments, ~~next~~was 12approximately ~~months~~$1.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

~~The~~Over ~~following~~time, ~~table~~the ~~presents~~realized ~~the~~and ~~effect~~unrealized ofgains ~~our~~and ~~derivative~~losses ~~financial~~held ~~instrument~~in ~~that~~accumulated isother ~~designated~~comprehensive ~~and~~loss ~~qualifies~~will be reclassified into earnings as aan ~~hedging~~adjustment ~~instrument~~to oninterest ~~the~~expense ~~consolidated~~in ~~statements~~the ofsame ~~operations~~periods ~~for~~in which the ~~years~~hedged ~~ended~~interest ~~December 31,~~payments ~~2015,~~affect ~~2014~~earnings. ~~and~~We ~~2013~~estimate ~~respectively~~that (approximately $0.4 million of the current balance held in ~~thousands):~~accumulated other comprehensive loss will be reclassified into interest expense within the next 12 months.

	Amount of LossRecognized inOther ComprehensiveLoss(Effective Portion)								Location of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income	Amount of Gain Reclassified fromAccumulated OtherComprehensive Loss into Income(Effective Portion)						Location of Gain Recognized in Income on Derivative	Amount of Gain Recognizedinto Income(Ineffective Portion)
	Year Ended December 31,									Year Ended December 31,							Year Ended December 31,
Derivative	2015			2014			2013			2015		2014		2013			2015		2014		2013
				(as adjusted)			(as adjusted)					(as adjusted)		(as adjusted)					(as adjusted)		(as adjusted)
Interest Rate Swap	$	(109	)	$	(135	)	$	—	Interest expense	$	999	$	970	$	914	Interest expense	$	3	$	4	$	3

The following table presents the effect of our derivative financial instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively (in thousands):

12. Rental Income



	Amount of Loss Recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss (Effective Portion)			Location of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income	Amount of Loss Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Income (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain Recognized in Income on Derivative	Amount of Gain Recognized into Income (Ineffective Portion)
	Year Ended December 31,				Year Ended December 31,				Year Ended December 31,
Derivative	2016	2015	2014		2016	2015	2014		2016	2015	2014
Interest Rate Swap

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer ý

Smaller Reporting Company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Filing Compare · RECKSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP