UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

Commission file number 0-27549

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	88-0362112
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

7756 E. Greenway Rd., Scottsdale, AZ 85260

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(480) 993-2300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

7701 E. Gray Rd., Suite 104, Scottsdale, AZ 85260

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No (not required)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 16,277,323 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, as of August 11, 2010.

	Index	Page Number

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	4

ITEM 1.	Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)	4

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit cumulative from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2010 (unaudited)	6

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)	7

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	8

ITEM 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16

ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	21

ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	21

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	23

ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	23

ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	23

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	23

ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	23

ITEM 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	23

ITEM 5.	Other Information	23

ITEM 6.	Exhibits	24

SIGNATURES		25

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	40,723		$	333,593
Accounts Receivable		-			16,152
Inventory		719,318			723,617
Prepaid Expenses		49,245			12,948

Total Current Assets		809,286			1,086,310

EQUIPMENT, NET		69,178			56,252

OTHER ASSETS
Patents, net		9,743			10,089
Deferred Financing Costs		16,089			19,802

Total Other Assets		25,832			29,891

Total Assets	$	904,296		$	1,172,453

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable	$	37,905		$	157,226
Accrued Expenses		5,681			2,039
Current Portion, Long term debt		2,559			10,068
Accrued Interest Payable		136,943			8,101
Warranty Accrual		38,718			39,951

Total Current Liabilities		221,806			217,385

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Notes Payable		2,986			2,986
Nores Payable - Related Parties		1,100,000			500,000

Total Liabilities		1,324,792			720,371

LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE		2,445,902			2,421,926

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common Stock: 25,000,000 shares
authorized at $0.001par value;
Issued and outstanding 16,277,323 and
15,767,323 shares, respectively		16,277			15,767
Additional Paid in Capital		15,715,518			15,588,528
Accumulated Deficit		(18,598,193	)		(17,574,139	)

Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(2,866,398	)		(1,969,844	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	904,296		$	1,172,453

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
										(Restated)
REVENUES
Product Sales	$	17,015		$	83,038		$	44,817		$	127,641
Other Income		165			808			462			1,193

Total Revenues		17,180			83,846			45,279			128,834

Cost of Goods Sold		19,184			69,290			41,844			111,742

Gross Profit (Loss)		(2,004	)		14,556			3,435			17,092

OPERATING EXPENSES
Legal and Professional		68,555			262,427			121,392			392,942
General and Administrative		214,526			209,864			442,093			971,114
Research and Development		80,443			10,051			94,276			19,120
Advertising and Marketing		3,944			12,543			21,847			60,083
Depreciation		5,017			6,088			10,458			12,140

Total Operating Expenses		372,485			500,973			690,066			1,455,399

Net Loss from Operations		(374,489	)		(486,417	)		(686,631	)		(1,438,307	)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Interest Income		86			-			172			-
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt		-			75,000			-			75,000
Reorganization Costs		(53,616	)		-			(106,841	)		-
Interest Expense		(115,794	)		(83,035	)		(230,754	)		(130,521	)

Total Other Income (Expense)		(169,324	)		(8,035	)		(337,423	)		(55,521	)

Net Loss before Income Taxes		(543,813	)		(494,452	)		(1,024,054	)		(1,493,828	)

Income Tax Expense		-			-			-			-

NET LOSS	$	(543,813	)	$	(494,452	)	$	(1,024,054	)	$	(1,493,828	)

Basic and diluted income (loss) per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.10	)

Weighted Average Number of Common
Shares Outstanding		16,071,609			14,527,936			16,173,898			14,229,583

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)

								Additional
	Common Stock				Common Stock			Paid in		Accumulated			Total
	Shares		Amount		Subscribed			Capital		Deficit			Deficit

Balance December 31, 2008 (Restated)		13,927,915	$	13,928	$	(24,000	)	$	14,317,969	$	(15,207,627	)	$	(899,730	)

Common stock issued for related party services		217,100		217					54,058					54,275
Common stock issued for consulting services		1,040,000		1,040					258,960					260,000
Common stock issued for cash		360,000		360		24,000			91,640					116,000
Common stock issued for legal fees		23,188		23					18,527					18,550
Common stock issued for financing costs		159,120		159					22,118					22,277
Common stock issued for services		40,000		40					9,960					10,000
Beneficial Conversion Feature									240,000					240,000
Fair Value Options Granted									575,296					575,296
Net Loss											(2,366,512	)		(2,366,512	)

Balance December 31, 2009		15,767,323		15,767		-			15,588,528		(17,574,139	)		(1,969,844	)

Common stock issued for compensation		510,000		510		-			126,990		-			127,500

Net Loss		-		-		-			-		(1,024,054	)		(1,024,054	)

Balance June 30, 2010 - (Unaudited)		16,277,323	$	16,277	$	-		$	15,715,518	$	(18,598,193	)	$	(2,866,398	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009
				(Restated)
Operating Activities
Net Loss	$	(1,024,054	)	$	(1,493,828	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in
operating activities:
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt		-			(75,000	)
Depreciation Expense		10,458			12,140
Amortization of Discount on Notes Payable		60,997			49,722
Amortization of Patents		347			-
Amortization of Financing Costs		3,713			-
Shares and Options Issued for Services Rendered		127,500			584,637
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Inventory		4,299			(282,953	)
Accounts Receivable		16,847			(22,160	)
Prepaid Expense		(36,991	)		75,147
Deposits		-			2,460
Accrued Interest Payable		128,842			72,160
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses		(153,935	)		71,108

Net Cash (Used) in Operating Activities		(861,977	)		(1,006,567	)

Investing Activities
Purchase of Assets		(23,384	)		(7,844	)

Net Cash (Used) in Investing Activities		(23,384	)		(7,844	)

Financing Activities
Repayment of Notes Payable		(7,509	)		(13,780	)
Proceeds from Notes Payable		-			760,851
DIP Financing Related Party		600,000			-
Proceeds from Common Stock		-			260,275

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		592,491			1,007,346

Net Decrease in Cash		(292,870	)		(7,065	)

Cash, Beginning of Period		333,593			37,822

Cash, End of Period	$	40,723		$	30,757

Supplemental Information:
Cash paid for:
Income Taxes	$	-		$	-
Interest Expense	$	13,642		$	3,455

Non Cash Financing Activities:
Common Stock Issued for Debt	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Debtor-In-Possession)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2010 (unaudited)

Note 1. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows at June 30, 2010, and for all periods presented herein, have been made.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s December 31, 2009 audited financial statements. The results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for each respective full year.

Note 2. VOLUNTARY PETITION UNDER CHAPTER 11

On December 16, 2009, the Company (“Debtor”) filed a Voluntary Petition under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada (the “Bankruptcy Court”). Under Chapter 11, certain claims against the Debtor in existence before the filing of the Voluntary Petition under the federal bankruptcy laws are stayed while the Debtor continues business operations as Debtor-in-Possession. These claims are classified as liabilities subject to compromise. Additional claims (liabilities subject to compromise) may arise after the filing date resulting from rejection of executor contracts, including leases, and from the determination by the court (or agreed to by parties in interest) of allowed claims for contingencies and other disputed amounts. Claims secured against the Debtor's assets (secured claims) also are stayed, although the holders of such claims have the right to move the court for relief from the stay. Secured claims are secured primarily by liens on the Debtor's property, plant, and equipment.

On April 19, 2010, the Company filed its Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Reorganization Plan”) with the Bankruptcy Court and a copy of such Reorganization Plan was mailed to all creditors and shareholders. On or about May 6, 2010, the Company filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking approval to file an amended Reorganization Plan (the “Amended Reorganization Plan”). On May 28, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered its order conditionally approving the Amended Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization and setting the matter for a Plan confirmation hearing on August 24, 2010. On or about July 9, 2010, the Amended Joint Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization was mailed to creditors and equity holders together with ballots for voting for approval or non-approval of the Reorganization Plan. The ballots are required to be returned on or before August 16, 2010. The Company incurred $101,317 of legal costs and $5,525 of trustee costs relative to the bankruptcy during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Note 3. GOING CONCERN

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred net losses since inception with an

accumulated deficit of $18,598,193 as of June 30, 2010. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management’s Plans

The Company has expended considerable efforts in working with its contract manufacturer in order to begin the production of its new line of products. The Company expects that the first commercial units will be produced in the second half of 2010 with sales and delivery to also commence during such period. The Company expects that it may take up to one year for the production design and processes to stabilize. The Company has continued to focus development efforts on the commercialization of its patent pending Paradigm™ technology. To date the Company has not been successful in developing a cost effective means to commercialize the technology into a consumer product line. The Company is currently negotiating with a critical supplier to jointly complete the engineering and commercialization process and then subsequently engage in engineering for manufacturing phase. The Company has developed and continues to develop a sales and distribution network.

The Company has funded all of its capital needs over the 2010 fiscal year by way of private placements and loans from related parties. The Company’s business strategy requires it to raise in excess of $2 million over the next 12- month period in order to fully execute its business plan. Management believes that, in order to properly launch the introduction of its products, it will be necessary to supply a sufficient volume of product to meet wholesale demand.

Note 4. INVENTORY

The Company contracts with a third party to manufacture the units and is neither billed for nor obligated for any work-in-process. The Company only supplies certain parts and materials and is then billed for completed products. The majority of inventory is in finished goods. Parts and material inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value that was $719,318 at June 30, 2010. Parts and materials purchased for development and testing are expensed directly to Research and Development.

Note 5. USE OF ESTIMATES

The discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires making estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that entail significant judgments and estimates, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions.

Note 6. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 510,000 shares of common stock to related parties for compensation in lieu of cash at $0.25 per share.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued $600,000 in related party notes payable. The related party notes payable bear interest at 10% and are due the earlier of two years from the date of funding of the first tranche under the Debtor-in-Possession financing or the closing of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Note 7. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements, which is effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 for new revenue arrangements or material modifications to existing agreements. The guidance amends the criteria for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of the guidance will have on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures.

In July 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses, which is effective for the Company on December 31, 2010. The guidance requires additional disclosures that facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of: (a) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables; (b) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses; and (c) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, the guidance amends current requirements to include additional disclosures about financing receivables, including: (a) credit quality indicators of financing receivables at the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables; (b) the aging of past due financing receivables at the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables; and (c) the nature and extent of troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the period by class of financing receivables and their effect on the allowance for credit losses. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of the guidance will have on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures.

Note 8. RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In August 2009, the Company was informed that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) revoked the registration of Moore & Associates Chartered (“Moore”) who was serving as the Company’s independent auditor. The revocation was a result of Moore’s violation of PCAOB rules and auditing standards. This revocation of Moore’s registration required the Company to have the financial statements issued for the year ended December 31, 2008 re-audited.

The re-audit produced material differences from the previously filed versions. Originally, the Company miscalculated the 2008 beneficial conversion feature which resulted in an understatement of liabilities amounting to $540,000 and a nominal change in the related interest expense. Further, the Company miscalculated the fair value of stock options that were granted during 2008, resulting in an understatement of the expense amounting to $129,912. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company miscalculated the fair value expense of stock options that were granted during the period ended March 31, 2009 resulting in an understatement of the fair value expense amounting to $571,167. These restatements impacted the six months ended June 30, 2009 statements. Included in this filing are the restated six months ended June 30, 2009 financial statements. For comparative purposes, the table below presents the restated balance sheet and income statement compared to the original filing for period ended June 30, 2009.

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	Restated			As filed
	June 30,			June 30,
	2009			2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	30,757		$	30,757
Accounts Receivable		27,012			27,012
Inventory		726,931			726,931
Prepaid Expenses		16,524			16,524
Total Current Assets		801,224			801,224
EQUIPMENT, NET		68,428			68,428
OTHER ASSETS
Patents, Net		4,914			4,914
Total Other Assets		4,914			4,914
Total Assets	$	874,566		$	874,566

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable	$	430,701		$	430,701
Accrued Expenses		27,988			27,988
Current Portion, LT Debt		7,999			7,999
Notes Payable - Related Parties		582,800			582,800
Accrued Interest Payable		206,574			206,574
Warranty Accrual		44,340			44,340
Total Current Liabilities		1,300,402			1,300,402
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Notes Payable		13,289			13,289
Convertible Notes Payable, net		1,109,522			557,777
Total Liabilities		2,423,213			1,871,468
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common Stock: 25,000,000 shares
authorized at $0.001par value;
Issued and outstanding 13,327,915 and
13,327,915 shares, respectively		14,865			14,865
Common Stock Subscribed		0			0
Additional Paid in Capital		15,137,944			14,976,865
Accumulated Deficit		(16,701,456	)		(15,988,631	)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(1,548,647	)		(996,901	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	874,566		$	874,566

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
	Six Months Ended June 30
	2009 Restated			2009 As Filed
REVENUES
Product Sales	$	127,641		$	127,641
Other Income		1,193			1,193
Total Revenues		128,834			128,834
Cost of Goods Sold		111,742			111,742
Gross Profit		17,092			17,092
EXPENSES
Legal and Professional		392,942			392,942
General and Administrative		971,114			399,947
Research and Development		19,120			19,120
Advertising and Marketing		60,083			60,083
Depreciation		12,140			12,140
Total Expenses		1,455,399			884,232
Loss from Operations		(1,438,307	)		(867,140	)
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE)
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt		75,000			75,000
Interest Expense		(130,521	)		(130,521	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(55,521	)		(55,521	)
Net Loss before Income Taxes		(1,493,828	)		(922,661	)
Income Tax Expense		-			-
NET LOSS	$	(1,493,828	)	$	(922,661	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.06	)
Weighted Average Number of Common
Shares Outstanding		14,229,583			14,229,583

Note 9. BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS

As a consequence of the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding, substantially all claims against the Company in existence prior to the filing of the Voluntary Petition or relating to acts or omissions prior to the filing of the Voluntary Petition for relief are stayed. These claims are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as “Liabilities subject to compromise” as of June 30, 2010. These amounts represent the Company’s best estimate of known or potential pre-petition liabilities that are probable of resulting in an allowed claim against the Company in connection with the Chapter 11 cases and are recorded at the estimated amount of the allowed claim which may be different from the amount for which the liability will be settled. Such claims remain subject to future adjustments. Adjustments may result from actions of the Bankruptcy Court, negotiations, rejection or acceptance of executory contracts and real property leases, determination as to the value of any collateral securing claims, proofs of claim or other events.

Liabilities subject to compromise consist of the following:

	As of June 30, 2010
Convertible Notes made in favor of a related party, unsecured, mature five-years from issue date, bear 10% interest payable quarterly, principal and interest convertible into one common share for each outstanding $0.25. Principal amount of $1,500,000 net of the discount for the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature of $402,477 as of June 30, 2010	$	1,097,523
Unsecured Demand Note made in favor of related party, 10% interest		25,000
Secured Loan made in favor of related party, 10% interest, due at September 4, 2012		369,800
Unsecured Demand Note made in favor of former affiliate, 10% interest		150,000
Secured Loan made in favor of related party, 10% interest, due at September 4, 2012		164,000
Unsecured Demand Loan made in favor of former affiliate, 10% interest		78,000
Total Debt Subject to Compromise		1,884,323
Accounts Payable		273,290
Accrued Interest Payable		288,289
Total Liabilities Subject to Compromise	$	2,445,902

Reorganization expenses are presented separately in the consolidated Statements of Operations on a net basis and represent items realized or incurred as a direct result of the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred $101,317 in legal fees and $5,525 in trustee fees relating to the bankruptcy.

Note 10. STOCK OPTIONS

Changes in stock options for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following:

			Weighted		Remaining
	Number		Average		Contractual
	Of		Exercise		Term		Intrinsic
	Shares		Price		(In Years)		Value

2009:
Beginning Balance		1,700,000	$	0.65		4.65	$	-
Granted		1,660,000		0.60		3.56		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-
Forfeited/Expired		-		-		-		-
Balance, December 31, 2009		3,360,000		0.68		3.60
Vested and expected to vest		3,360,000		0.68		3.60		-
Exercisable		-		-		-		-

2010:
Beginning Balance		3,360,000		0.68		3.60		-
Granted		-		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-
Forfeited/Expired		-		-		-		-

Balance, June 30, 2010		3,360,000		0.68		3.10	$	-
Vested and expected to vest		3,360,000		0.68		3.10		-
Exercisable		-		-		-		-

The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0.35 per

option.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2010:

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
			Weighted
			Average
			Remaining		Weighted				Weighted
Range of			Contractual		Average				Average
Exercise	Number		Life		Exercise		Number		Exercise
Prices	Outstanding		(in years)		Price		Exercisable		Price

$0.50		3,000,000		3.71	$	0.50		-		-
$2.00		200,000		3.68	$	2.00		-		-
$2.50		160,000		0.02	$	2.50		-		-

$0.50 - $2.50		3,360,000		3.52	$	0.68		-		-

Note 11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 19, 2010, the Company signed a three-year lease for 9,830 square feet of office and warehouse space located at 7756 East Greenway Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260. The monthly rent is $5,803 for August through November of 2010; $8,855 for December 2010 through July 2012; and $9,121 for August 2012 through July 2013.

In accordance with ASC 855-10, Company management reviewed all material events through the date of this report and determined that there are no material subsequent events to report, other than as disclosed herein.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” or other similar words. These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made. Except for our ongoing securities laws, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement. Additionally, the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 most likely do not apply to our forward-looking statements as a result of being a penny stock issuer. You should, however, consult further disclosures we make in future filings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

o	our ability to diversify our operations;
o	our ability to successfully compete in the energy efficient industry, including our ability to achieve EnergyStar® recognition of our products;
o	our inability to raise additional financing for working capital;
o	the fact that our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we report our financial condition and results of operation which may require management to make estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain;

o	our ability to attract key personnel;
o	our ability to operate profitably;
o	deterioration in general or regional economic conditions;
o	changes in U.S. GAAP or in the legal, regulatory and legislative environments in the markets in which we operate;

o	adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing operations;
o	our inability to achieve future sales levels or other profitable operating results;
o	the inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and business plans;
o	the unavailability of funds for capital expenditures.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the SEC that can be inspected and copied at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405. Information regarding the public reference facilities may be obtained from the SEC by telephoning 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company’s filings are also available through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval System which is publicly available through the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). Copies of such materials may also be obtained by mail from the public reference section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405 at prescribed rates.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Form 10-Q.

Business of the Company

The Company is in the business of designing, developing, and marketing consumer water heating appliances. All of the Company’s products are designed by in-house engineering and contract engineers from third party engineering firms. In an effort to transition to a “fabrication free” business model, all appliances produced for the Company are manufactured by third party contract manufacturers. The Company first entered its current line of business through the acquisition of Envirotech and its product line - the ESI-2000 electric tankless water heater. Though viewed by many to be a significant advancement in whole house electric tankless water heaters, the ESI-2000 product line never achieved critical sales levels, and thus production of the ESI-2000 product line concluded in late 2005. In response to lackluster ESI-2000 product sales, the Company engaged in a substantial research and development program to design a line of replacement heating appliances. The first product that the Company released to the market in October 2008 in limited volumes was the FORTIS™ electric tankless whole house water heater. The Company believes that the FORTIS™ offers the following advantages: its small size, ease of installation, and its ability to supply virtually endless amounts of hot water with energy savings. The FORTIS™ uses advanced technology and high quality stainless steel components that are expected to provide increased reliability and longevity. SKYE’s tankless water heaters generate heated water only as long as hot water is required and only at the temperature desired. Since electricity is only used when heated water is required, the cost of heating water can be reduced by as much as 40% or more compared to a storage type water heater. Because all of SKYE’s products are compact, durable, self-contained and safe, they can be easily installed close to where hot water is being used, and they are ideal for condos, apartments, multifamily residences and homes where space is at a premium or where instant hot water is desired.

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

On December 16, 2009 we filed a voluntary petition of Bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada in Reno, Nevada (the “Bankruptcy Court”) seeking Debtor-in-Possession status while we pursue reorganization under Chapter 11. At the time of the voluntary petition filing, we claimed total liabilities of $3,167,387 and total assets of $1,050,529. Additionally, the schedules to the voluntary petition disclosed three creditors holding secured claims of $577,332 and 53 creditors holding unsecured claims of $2,590,055. On December 21, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court issued an Order approving a Debtor-in-Possession interim financing plan between the Company and Summit Growth Management LLC (“Summit”) in the gross amount of $500,000 less fees, expenses, legal fees and a prior loan of $80,000. At a hearing on February 19, 2009, the Court issued a Final Order to approve the terms of the Debtor-in-Possession financing agreement (“DIP Financing Agreement”) between the Company and Summit in the total gross amount of $2,000,000. The DIP Financing Agreement is more fully described in the exhibits to the registrant’s report on Form 8-K, filed December 17, 2009. The Company prepared and filed a Joint Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement (the “Reorganization Plan”) that was subsequently mailed to our creditors and shareholders for consideration and approval.

On or about May 6, 2010, we filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking approval to file an amended plan of reorganization (the “Amended Reorganization Plan”), which motion was approved on May 25, 2010. On May 20, 2010, we filed our Amended Joint Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization. On May 28, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered its order conditionally approving the Amended Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization and setting the matter for a Plan Confirmation hearing on August 24, 2010. On or about July 9, 2010, the Amended Joint Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization was mailed to creditors and equity holders of the Company together with ballots for voting for approval or non-approval of the amended Plan of Reorganization which ballots are required to be returned for tally on or before August 16, 2010. As of the date of this Report, the Company has received $1,200,000 of the previously announced Debtor-in-Possession financing with an additional $800,000 to be drawn thereunder.

A critical component of our operating plan impacting our continued existence is the ability to obtain additional capital through equity and/or debt financing. Since inception, we have financed our cash flow requirements primarily through issuances of common stock and debt. As we continue our activities, we are likely to continue to experience net negative cash flows from operations, pending receipt of significant revenues from sales of our products. Most of the Company’s cash needs have been met through loans advanced to the Company by certain of its related party directors and some private placement purchases. The Company expects that additional operating losses will occur until revenue is sufficient to offset the costs incurred for marketing, sales and product development. Until the Company has achieved a sales level sufficient to break even, it will not be self-sustaining or competitive in the areas in which it intends to operate. The Company will require additional working capital for general operations and otherwise to implement its sales and marketing plans. We anticipate obtaining additional financing to fund operations through draws on the DIP Financing, common stock offerings, debt offerings and bank borrowings, to the extent available and if approved by the Bankruptcy Court during the Chapter 11 proceedings, or to obtain additional financing to the extent necessary to augment our working capital. In the event we cannot obtain the necessary capital to pursue our strategic plan, we may have to significantly curtail our operations. This would materially impact our ability to continue operations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional funding when needed, or that such funding, if available, can be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company, or if acceptable, that such funds will be approved by the Bankruptcy Court. It is likely that any debt or equity financing will have a negative impact on our financial condition and will result in additional dilution of our stockholders common share interests and this dilution could be significant.

At June 30, 2010, we had cash and working capital of $40,723 and $587,480, respectively, as compared to cash of $333,953 and working capital of $868,925 at December 31, 2009. The decrease was due primarily to the net loss for the period. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, operating activities used $861,977 of cash. Proceeds from the DIP Financing in the amount of $600,000 partially offset the cash used, resulting in a decrease of cash of $292,870. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, operating activities used cash of $1,006,567, while financing activities, principally proceeds from borrowing and the sale of common stock, provided cash of $1,007,346.

As a measure to reduce cash expenditures, we issued a total of 510,000 restricted common shares to our President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Operating Officer valued at $127,500 for compensation during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 months.

As of June 30, 2010, we did not have sufficient available cash to pursue our business plan. With the intention to continue to expand FORTIS™ production, acquire additional Heatwave™ inventory for distribution and to acquire the tooling and supplies necessary to commence commercial production of the Paradigm™ product line, we intend to make further debt draws available to us under the Court approved DIP Financing and also plan to seek financing for operations through equity and/or debt or other means that may become available to us. If we are not able to receive any additional funds, we cannot continue our proposed business operations.

Summary of any product research and development that we will perform for the term of the plan.

We anticipate contracting with outside engineering firms to provide the necessary research and development for new product lines incorporating the Company’s Paradigm™ technology. Over the balance of fiscal 2010 the Company expects to expend approximately $50,000 to $100,000 in additional research and development initiatives to complete engineering on new product offerings currently under development, including three-phase and commercial water heaters, as well as heaters designed to incorporate solar additions. A significant amount of effort and cash expenditures have been recently focused on completing the safety certification of our pending Paradigm™ product line. However, certification fees will continue as we seek safety certifications of new products generated from current engineering efforts.

Expected purchase or rent of plant and significant equipment.

As we continue to grow our sales force, we expect that it will be necessary to relocate to larger facilities capable of accommodating limited transshipping of parts and components used in the manufacturing process of our products. Additionally, as we add new sales territories, we expect that it will be necessary to add new computer

hardware and software capable of assisting in the sales, distribution, accounting and customer service process. We will also work to integrate our accounting and inventory systems so as to provide real time access to critical product inventory information to aide in the timely distribution of our products to our customers.

Plan of Operation and Executive Summary

The Company is in the business of designing, contracting for the production of, and marketing consumer lifestyle appliances, including, initially a full suite of electric tankless water heaters. The Company’s premier consumer product is the FORTIS™, a series of whole-house electric tankless water heaters. The Company markets the FORTIS™ tankless water heater through wholesale distribution reached primarily through an established and growing list of manufacturer representatives (outside contracted sales force) located in many states across the United States. Effective June 30, 2009, the Company added, on a test basis, the internet direct marketing channel to produce sales through its newly formed subsidiary Tankless.com, Inc. The Company expects that the wholesale channel will continue to be the largest distribution channel for the Company and, to this end, it expects to continue to fully support its wholesale channel efforts through significant additions to its internet presence to provide a feature and content rich website for consumer information on the Company’s “green” products and general tankless product information and specifications. To support the wholesaler’s changing needs, the Company has modified its distribution procedure to now warehouse inventory in select cities closer to the customer.

Having recently received Intertek safety certification to the UL499 and CSA C22.2 standards, the Company commenced sales of its private labeled HeatWave™ product line as of June 1, 2009. The Company believes that its HeatWave™ product is an innovative, powerful and inexpensive commercial point-of-use solution for local hot water code compliance in commercial buildings. Initial product supply volumes were limited in 2009 and thus we did not generate significant revenues from this product line. Commencing February 2010, we have greater product availability and thus we anticipate expanding the sales of the HeatWave™ product line. Specifically, we intend to position the HeatWave™ as a low cost code compliance alternative to traditional immersion resistance products. Leveraging the rapid heat delivery and significant duty cycle of the HeatWave™, management believes that it will soon become a plumbing specified unit of choice for many builders and mechanical specifiers.

The Company has been diligently pursuing the steps necessary to bring its Paradigm™ technology into commercial production. During the latter part of the third quarter of 2009, the Company submitted its proprietary Paradigm™ series point-of-use water heater in 208VAC, 240VAC and 277VAC for safety certification to the UL499 and CSA C22.2 standards. As of the date of this Report, we have received certification under the UL 499 and CSA 22.2 standards only for the 208VAC and 240VAC models. We are awaiting the results of ongoing safety investigations for further certification under UL 499 and CSA C22.2 for the 277VAC model. In order to expedite the availability of this product, we have commenced the purchase of all the manufacturing tooling required to produce the Paradigm™ booster series. Initially, product production volumes will be limited in order to test overall demand so as to manage the amount of capital necessary for this specific product line. As demand warrants, we expect to increase production. Therefore, we have contracts in place that provide significant flexibility to quickly expand production to meet expected product demand. First deliveries of the Paradigm™ product line is expected during the third quarter of 2010.

The Company has established relationships with several contract manufacturers to provide product manufacturing services. The Company has both low volume and high volume manufacturers available for all products except the HeatWave™ which currently has a single source supplier. Depending on the product demand, we are able to select a manufacturer for each specific product manufacturing run. As is the case with all new product introductions, we expect that it may take up to one year for the production and design processes to stabilize for each product line. Once such processes and designs have stabilized, the Company will seek and implement product cost reductions accordingly. As of the date of this Report, we have run extensive cost reduction analysis on the FORTIS™ product line that has resulted in certain design and component supplier changes. The financial impact of these cost reduction steps will not be realized until late 2010 or early 2011.

Over the balance of 2010, we will continue to focus our efforts on expanding sales of our FORTIS™ and HeatWave™ product lines through focused marketing efforts to plumbers and homebuilders in select markets. Additionally we expect to continue our research and development program to develop three-phase commercial tankless water heaters for regulatory certification in 2010. We will continue our lobbying efforts to gain recognition under the Environmental Protection Agency’s “EnergyStar®” program and we will continue to work closely with our industry associations and Federal government to ensure that electric tankless becomes eligible for energy efficiency programs as they develop. We will continue to work and build our sales and customer service infrastructure to support product sales and revenue for the Company. We are currently engaged in a concerted effort to appoint manufacturer representatives over the balance of states in which we intend to focus our sales efforts. As a means to support our overall sales initiatives over the balance of 2010, we expect to add new features and functionality to our website including streaming video guides for installation and troubleshooting so that our potential customers can easily access consumer product information as a part of their buying process. All of our efforts are being done with a view to building a high quality brand that will continue to garner recognition in the industry as a premier supplier of high-end appliances. We will continue to support our wholesale distribution channel and work with our customers and wholesale partners to grow our business into a respected and trusted manufacturer of high-quality appliances.

Results of Operations

Three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to three months ended June 30, 2009

Revenues for the second quarter ended June 30, 2010 were $17,015 compared to revenues of $83,038 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $66,023 (80%). The decrease in sales revenues was attributable to a change in the Company’s sales terms and conditions. In 2009, a wholesaler was required to purchase a minimum of 24 FORTIS™ water heaters in order to receive best pricing. In 2010, a wholesaler can now buy in smaller quantities as they are under significant financial pressure to reduce or eliminate inventory.

The negative gross profit for the second quarter ended June 30, 2010 was attributable to an increase in freight not charged to customers and an increase in credits to customers for returned units not replaced.

Operating expenses decreased $128,488 (26%), but still greatly exceed our revenues. We reduced legal and professional expenses by $193,872 (74%), as all of our lawsuits have been stayed due to our Chapter 11 filing in the Bankruptcy Court. General and administrative expenses increased by $4,662 (3%) during the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase resulted from an increase in commercial insurance cost. Research and development expenses increased $70,392 (700%), with 95% of the increase attributable to payment for research and development for the new Paradigm™ product line.

Our operating loss was determined more by our operating expenses than by revenues for the quarter. Accordingly, we incurred an operating loss of $374,489, a decrease of $111,928 (23%) from the comparable 2009 period.

We recognized other expense of $169,324 in 2010, as compared to $8,035 in 2009, an increase of $161,289. The increase in other expense was due to reorganization expenses of $53,617 and interest expense of $32,759 for the Chapter 11 DIP financing in 2010, and a gain of $75,000 on extinguishment of debt in 2009.

The net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $543,813 which represents a 10% increase in the loss recorded in the June 30, 2009 period of $494,452. The increase in the loss resulted from the incurring of reorganization expenses and a decrease in revenues.

Six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to six months ended June 30, 2009

Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $45,279, compared to revenues of $128,834 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, a decrease of $83,555 (65%). The decrease in revenues was attributable to a decline in the sales for our FORTIS™ product line. As described above, the Company eliminated a minimum purchase requirement for its wholesalers in 2010, resulting in fewer units being sold during the current period.

The gross profit margin for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 7.6% compared to 13% for the same period in 2009. The decrease resulted from an increase in 2010 of freight not charged to the customers and credits to customers for returned units not replaced.

Operating expenses decreased $765,333 (53%), but still greatly exceed our revenues. We reduced legal and professional expenses by $271,550 (70%), as all of our lawsuits have been stayed due to our Chapter 11 filing in the Bankruptcy Court. General and administrative expenses decreased by $529,021 (55%) during the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease is attributable to no stock options being issued during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Research and development expenses increased $75,156 (393%), with 89% of the increase attributable to payment for research and development on the new Paradigm™ product line. Additionally, advertising and marketing expenses decreased $38,236 (64%) due to reduced exhibits at trade shows and printing of advertising brochures for the FORTIS™ and HeatWave™ product lines.

Our operating loss was determined more by our operating expenses than by revenues for the six-month period. Accordingly, we incurred an operating loss of $686,631, a decrease of $751,676 (53%) from the comparable 2009 period.

We recognized other expense of $337,423 in 2010, as compared to $55,521 in 2009, an increase of $281,902. The increase in other expense was due to reorganization expenses of $106,842 incurred in 2010 and a gain of $75,000 on extinguishment of debt in 2009. Interest expense was also higher by $100,233 (77%) in 2010 because of the interest on the DIP financing.

The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $1,024,054 which represents a 31% decrease in the loss recorded in the June 30, 2009 period of $1,493,828. The decrease in the loss resulted from the decrease in operating expenses.

Going Concern

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, includes an explanatory paragraph indicating substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. We have an accumulated deficit of $18,598,193 as of June 30, 2010. We have not generated meaningful revenues in the last two fiscal years. Our ability to establish the Company as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional financing, in order to fund our planned operations and ultimately, to achieve profitable operations.

Intangible Assets

The Company’s intangible assets consist of three pending patents and five issued patents. Generally a patent has a life of 17 to 20 years. The Company performed an impairment test and has determined that, as of June 30, 2010, no impairment exists on any of the Company’s assets based on the present value of future cash flows generated from Company assets.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the following policies as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The preparation of these financial statements require us to make estimates and assumptions that effect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. The effect of these policies on our business operations is discussed below where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results.

Revenue Recognition. We record sales when revenue is earned. We sell on credit to our distributors and manufacturer representatives. All shipments are FOB shipping. We had $44,817 and $127,641 in revenue from sales of products during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Warranty and Right of Return. In connection with the sale of each product, we provide a limited 30-day money back guarantee less a 15% restocking charge. After the 30 days, we provide a five-year warranty on replacement of parts. The tank chamber is warranted not to leak for 10 years. We have limited history with claims against our warranty. As of June 30, 2010, a total of $38,718 in warranty allowances was recorded against product sales.

Patents. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable based on expected undiscounted cash flows that result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. The amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset. Patent and software costs include direct costs of obtaining patents. Costs for new patents are either expensed as they are incurred or capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful lives of seventeen years and software over five years.

Research and Development. Our research and development efforts concentrate on new product development, improving product durability and expanding technical expertise in the manufacturing process. We expense product research and development costs as they are incurred. We incurred research and development expense of $94,276 and $19,120 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Stock Based Compensation. All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options are recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. We use the Black-Scholes pricing model for determining the fair value of stock based compensation.

Equity instruments issued to non-employees for goods or services are accounted for at fair value when the service is complete or a performance commitment date is reached.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Exchange Act, Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information we were required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. During the 2008 fiscal year, the Company implemented a new secure accounting system, separated internal responsibilities for accounting, record keeping, check writing and reconciliation between different parties with the Company and also adopted various policies and procedures designed to implement the Integrated Framework issued by COSO. These actions taken in 2008 constituted changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the 2009 fiscal year we tested our procedures and recorded the results thereof in an effort to determine whether such controls continued to provide an effective internal control over financial reporting. We determined that there was a material weakness in the recording of certain equity and debt instruments resulting from a failure to confirm the receipt of transactions by internal accounting and external third party consultants hired to ensure compliance with current accounting and disclosure requirements. As a result we have amended our procedures to include a process by which all equity and debt transactions are recorded, summarized and then transmitted to external consultants. These actions constituted changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2010.

This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this quarterly report.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Since the Company’s annual report on Form 10K for the period ended December 31, 2009 until the date of this Report, there have been no actions initiated, terminated or that have resulted in material changes from the status as reported for such period.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

None.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued shares of our common stock in transactions that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 as follows:

Persons or Class of Persons	Date of Issue	Securities	Consideration

Ted Marek	6/17/2010	120,000 shares	Compensation under services agreement valued at $30,000

Perry Logan	6/17/2010	120,000 shares	Compensation under services agreement valued at $30,000

We issued shares in reliance on the exemption from the registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The shares did not involve a public offering or general solicitation and no underwriters were involved. The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to the relevant information needed to make their investment decision, including our financial statements. We reasonably believed that the recipients had such knowledge and experience in the Company’s financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of their investment.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.

(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

None.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

On or about May 6, 2010 we filed a motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking approval to file an amended plan of reorganization (the “Amended Reorganization Plan”), which motion was approved on May 25, 2010. On May 20, 1010, we filed our Amended Joint Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization. On May 28, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court entered its order conditionally approving the Amended Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization and setting the matter for a Plan Confirmation hearing on August 24, 2010. On or about July 9, 2010, the Amended Joint Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization was mailed to creditors and equity holders of the Company together with ballots for voting for approval or non-approval of the Amended Plan of Reorganization which ballots are required to be returned for a tally on or before August 16, 2010.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

Regulation S-K Number	Exhibit
2.1	Agreement of Share Exchange and Plan of Reorganization dated November 4, 2003 (1)
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Amexan, Inc. (2)
3.2	Articles of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of Amexan, Inc. (2)
3.3	Articles of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of Nostalgia Motors, Inc. (3)
3.4	Articles of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of Elution Technologies, Inc. (4)
3.5	Articles of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of Tankless Systems Worldwide, Inc. (5)
3.6	Bylaws, as Amended (6)
3.7	Certificate of Change Pursuant to NRS 78.209, as corrected (7)
10.1	2003 Stock Incentive Plan (8)
10.2	2003 Stock Incentive Plan #2 (9)
10.3	2005 Stock Incentive Plan (10)
10.9	Steven G. Mihaylo Trust Convertible Debenture (11)
10.10	Loan Agreement with Thaddeus (Ted) F. Marek dated October 12, 2007 (12)
10.11	Loan Agreement with Perry Logan dated October 12, 2007 (12)
10.12	Security Agreement with Thaddeus (Ted) F. Marek dated October 12, 2007 (12)
10.13	Security Agreement with Perry Logan dated October 12, 2007 (12)
10.14	15% Secured Convertible Promissory Note with Thaddeus (Ted) F. Marek dated October 12, 2007 (12)
10.15	15% Secured Convertible Promissory Note with Perry Logan dated October 12, 2007 (12)
10.16	Personal Services Agreement with Perry D. Logan dated May 15, 2008 (12)
10.17	Personal Services Agreement with Thaddeus (Ted) F. Marek dated May 15, 2008 (12)
10.18	Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, Security Agreement and Short Term Loan Agreement (13)
10.19	Debtor in Possession, Interim Financing and Post-Confirmation Funding Agreement (14)
21.1	Subsidiaries of SKYE International, Inc.
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Chief Financial Officer

________________

(1)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed November 7, 2003.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s registration statement on Form 10-SB, filed October 5, 1999.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, filed May 15, 2003
(4)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, filed August 21, 2003.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed February 24, 2006.
(7)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed May 20, 2008
(8)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, file number 333-108728, filed September 12, 2003.
(9)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, file number 333-111348, filed December 19, 2003.
(10)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, file number 333-123663, filed March 30, 2005.
(11)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, filed September 22, 2008.

(12)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
(13)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, filed November 13, 2009
(14)	Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed December 17, 2009

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date: August 13, 2010	By:	/s/ Perry D. Logan
		Perry D. Logan
		Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 13, 2010	By:	/s/ Thaddeus (Ted) F. Marek
		Thaddeus (Ted) F. Marek
		Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

SKYE INTERNATIONAL, INC 10-Q