10-K 1 p15125_form10k.txt ANNUAL REPORT ================================================================================ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K |X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Year Ended December 31, 2001, or |_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________ to ____________. COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-23289 HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE 77-0252931 (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.) INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) 6409 Guadalupe Mines Road 95120 San Jose, California (ZIP CODE) (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (408) 323-6500 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: common stock, par value $0.001 per share Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_| Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K |_| As of February 28, 2002, there were outstanding 22,788,384 shares of the Registrant's common stock, $0.001 par value per share. As of that date, the aggregate market value of the shares of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the average bid and ask prices of such stock as of such date as reported by The Nasdaq Small Cap Market was approximately $1,546,000. This excludes shares of common stock held by directors, officers and stockholders whose ownership exceeded ten percent of the shares outstanding. Exclusion of shares held by any person should not be construed to indicate that such person possesses power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the Registrant, or that such person is controlled by or is under common control with the Registrant. ================================================================================ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ---- PART I ITEM 1 Business...................................................... 1 ITEM 2 Properties.................................................... 5 ITEM 3 Legal Proceedings............................................. 5 ITEM 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........... 5 PART II ITEM 5 Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.............................. .......... 6 ITEM 6 Selected Financial Data....................................... 7 ITEM 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations......................... 8 ITEM 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.... 17 ITEM 8 Financial Statements.......................................... 18 ITEM 9 Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.................................... 40 PART III ITEM 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Company............... 41 ITEM 11 Executive Compensation........................................ 42 ITEM 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.............................................. 44 ITEM 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................ 46 PART IV ITEM 14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K........................................ 48 Signatures................................................................. 51 Exhibits As used in this report on Form 10-K, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we," "us," or, "the Company" and "Hybrid" refer to Hybrid Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation. PART I This report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or financial results, including such statements indicating that "we believe," "we expect," "we anticipate", or "we intend" that certain events may occur or certain trends may continue. Other forward-looking statements include statements about the future development of products or technologies, matters relating to our proprietary rights, facilities needs, our liquidity and capital needs, and other statements about future matters. All these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. You should not rely too heavily on these statements; although they reflect the good faith judgment of our management, they involve future events that might not occur. We can only base such statements on facts and factors that we currently know. Our actual results could differ materially from those in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements as a result of subsequent events. ITEM 1. BUSINESS Liquidity Concerns During 2001, we refocused our targeted opportunities to the international marketplace as we adjusted to the abrupt downturn in the domestic markets, in particular Sprint Corporation's and certain other domestic operator's decisions to cease the expansion of their deployments and to cease purchasing our products as a result. International opportunities have not developed as rapidly as we anticipated, and we believe that domestic and international revenues will be depressed for substantially all of 2002. As a result, we do not foresee sufficient revenues to meet our operating expenses. Our current liabilities, including a $5.5 million debenture due April 30, 2002, exceeded our cash and cash equivalents by approximately $4.2 million at December 31, 2001, and working capital at that date was only $736,000. If we cannot consummate a sale or merger on favorable terms we may be forced to seek protection under the federal bankruptcy laws. There is no assurance that we will be able to consummate a sale or merger or, even if we can do so, that the holders of our common stock or preferred stock will receive any net proceeds from such sale or merger. FOR OTHER IMPORTANT RISKS REGARDING OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OUR BUSINESS, SEE RISK FACTORS INCLUDED IN ITEM 7 OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K. Overview We are a fixed broadband wireless access equipment company that designs, develops, manufactures and markets wireless systems that provide high-speed access to the Internet for businesses and consumers. Our systems provide consumers with a wireless alternative for high-speed Internet access. Our products greatly accelerate the response time for accessing bandwidth-intensive information. Since 1996, our principal product line has been the Hybrid Series 2000, which consists of base station routers, network and subscriber management tools and a line of wireless end-user routers or Customer Premise Equipment (CPE). In the past, the majority of our products have been sold in the United States and Canada. Our customers include broadband wireless system operators, national and regional telephone companies, and systems integrators who market our product and extend our sales channel worldwide. To date, we believe our systems are deployed across more than 85% of the active MMDS frequencies in the U.S. and we continue to market our products to operators worldwide who have licensed frequencies below 6 GHz. Although in the past we have sold most of our products in the United States and Canada, many of our new opportunities are being pursued internationally. However, international opportunities have not developed as rapidly as we anticipated and we believe that international sales will be depressed for substantially all of 2002. The sales cycle for our products is lengthy, and is subject to a number of significant risks, including our customers' capital budget constraints and the processing time for an application for the use of licensed radio frequencies submitted to governmental regulatory agencies. Any delay or loss of an order that is expected in a quarter can have a major effect on our sales and operating results for that quarter. The same is true of any failure of a customer to pay for products on a timely basis. 1 The market for high-speed network connectivity products and services is highly competitive. On-going factors affecting our business include: o A slow adoption rate of fixed broadband wireless (FBBW) systems by service providers. Systems operators have been cautious in their approach to the fixed broadband wireless market and they have been slow to make significant capital investments. o Constant technology change and the development of new product features. New competitors have entered the fixed broadband wireless market with products that they claim will outperform our products due to improved functionality, new features, and different technologies. o Evolving industry standards. The fixed broadband wireless industry has yet to adopt industry standards and this has an adverse affect on equipment sales and earnings. Hybrid maintains active participation in standards committees affecting the fixed broadband wireless industry. If a technology different than ours is selected as the industry standard, future sales growth will be directly affected by our ability to modify our existing products to comply with that standard. Hybrid systems are now deployed in 77 markets on five continents. Hybrid was incorporated in Delaware in June 1990. Our principal executive offices are located at 6409 Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose, California, 95120. Our telephone number is (408) 323-6500. Technology, Products, and Services Our products are an integral part of a system operator's full wireless high-speed Internet access system. Our Series 2000 product-line includes base station routers, network and subscriber management tools, and a line of wireless end-user routers. Our base station routers and management tools are used by broadband wireless operators at their base stations to connect Internet subscribers to the operator's networks in order to give the subscribers high-speed Internet access. Our base station products provide management systems that allow the operators to configure and manage their networks, and establish different levels of services and charges among end-users. This enables the operators to give higher service to premium-paying, high-volume subscribers and allocate unused capacity to lower-volume groups. Wireless operators typically service single-computer customers or local area networks used by high-end residential customers and the operators use our end-user products to connect subscribers to the wireless systems networks at the subscribers' sites. Technology Our Series 2000 system is expandable and is designed to serve up to 100,000 routers. Each of the multiple return antennas is pointed in a slightly different direction, to increase the capacity of the available return frequency spectrum. Because most operators have only 10MHz of return channel capacity available, return sectorization is necessary to re-use spectrum until other options such as MMDS return are allowed. Our proprietary software allows subscribers to share many return channels and also allows a burst into a continuous transmission state to transfer or send large amounts of data upstream. The operator can optimize performance for business users yet still provide other users access to capacity. Some operators set up two or three groups of return channels with different bandwidths which enables them to provide different service levels or groups for business and residential customers. Our products are integrated with other telecommunications equipment to create a complete wireless system. In 2001, Hybrid entered agreements with two global systems integrators, REMEC and Thales Communications. Each of these system integrators offer wireless operators a complete turnkey system that integrates our products with the radio and Internet equipment necessary to deploy a wireless system. 2 Products Base Station Equipment CYBERMANAGER2000 (CMG). Proprietary subscriber and network management software which allows the operator to configure service levels, or groups, for both business and residential end-users; the CMG is an off-the-shelf Sun Workstation. CYBERMASTER DOWNSTREAM ROUTER (CMD). Rack-mounted industrial microcomputer capable of covering 12 MHz of bandwidth CYBERMASTER UPSTREAM ROUTER (CMU). Rack-mounted industrial microcomputer capable of supporting 28 channels Consumer premises Equipment Wireless Broadband Router (WBR) The Multi-User (1-60 user) WBR supports 10 Mb/s, with 64-QAM downstream data transmission and upstream transmission using wireless return, telephone modem or router. Services Our product support services include consulting, systems engineering, systems integration, installation, training, and technical support. Our network operations group also works with the customer during site preparation to aid in systems engineering, system integration, installation, and acceptance testing for system start-up. Customers Our customers are principally wireless system operators and national or regional telephone companies. A small number of customers have traditionally accounted for a large portion of our net sales. In 2001, Sprint Corporation accounted for 88% of our net sales. We expect virtually no revenue from Sprint in 2002. See Risk Factors - We Are Largely Dependant On Sprint. During 2000, two customers accounted for 54% and 23% of our net sales and two customers accounted for 31% and 28% of net sales during 1999. During 1999, we issued to Sprint Corporation 4,066,466 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase $8.4 million principal amount of convertible debentures that is convertible into 2,946,622 shares of our common stock. Two positions on our Board of Directors are reserved for Sprint designees, and we cannot issue any securities (with limited exceptions) or, in most cases, take any material corporate action without Sprint's approval. Sprint has other rights and privileges as well, including pre-emptive rights and a right of first refusal in the case of any proposed change of control transaction, which right of first refusal is assignable by Sprint to any third- party. Prior to 2000, most of our sales were to cable customers. However, these sales represented less than 1% of our total sales in 2001. Sales and Marketing Sales in 2001 were made primarily to companies in the United States. Sales are made through our field sales force as well as global and regional system integrators. As of December 31, 2001, the total amount of shipments not recognized as revenue due to acceptance or testing criteria or because they were sales to a distributor were $154,000. Our product sales backlog on December 31, 2001 was $336,000 and consisted of customer purchase orders which had been received and accepted and for which we have a reasonable expectation of shipment within the current fiscal period. The comparable backlog figure as of February 28, 2001 was $2.7 million. 3 Manufacturing We outsource manufacturing of the product modules to third parties, while maintaining a limited in-house manufacturing capability for pre-production assembly and testing. Our Series 2000 wireless broadband routers are manufactured by Sharp Corporation through an agreement we have had since early 1997 with Sharp and its distributor, Itochu Corporation. We typically provide a 12 to 18 month warranty on our hardware products that includes factory repair service. We also provide customer support as a purchase option that includes telephone and e-mail support, software maintenance releases, and technical bulletins. Research and Development At February 20, 2002, our research and development staff consisted of 22 full-time employees, and one local consultant. Our total research and development expenses for 2001, 2000, and 1999, were $6,986,000, $6,715,000, and $4,191,000, respectively. Our research and development effort during 2001 was directed primarily towards reducing the cost of manufacturing and improving the performance of client routers. Competition We are primarily engaged in the business of manufacturing FBBW high-speed Internet access equipment. Most of our competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution, customer support, and other resources, in addition to having greater name recognition and access to customers than we have. Competitors in the wireless market include Vyyo, Alvarion, and Netro, in addition to new-market entrants including, among others, Navini and IPWireless. Participants in the wireless broadband access market have not settled on a technology standard for equipment to serve this market. Our major competitors have created or joined in consortia to promote the technology they are employing as the industry standard, which are different from our underlying technology. While Hybrid also actively promotes its technology, if the marketplace settles on a standard that we do not employ, our competitive position would be seriously impaired. Our customers compete with providers of other forms of high-speed Internet access, including DSL and cable. Telephone companies are deploying DSL, providing high-speed Internet access over existing phone wires. They are working with computer vendors to install DSL cards in PCs manufactured by those companies, thereby reducing the telephone companies' distribution costs. DSL and cable pose a significant competitive threat to the services offered by our customers. Intellectual Property We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual restrictions to establish and protect proprietary rights in our products. We have received 15 patents from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. These patents are directed to various aspects of wireless and cable modems and base station systems. In addition, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued formal notices of allowances for pending patent applications which are also directed to wireless and cable modems and base station systems, as well as various modulation and transmission schemes used in wireless cable modem systems. We have a number of patent applications pending before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, as well as before patent offices of foreign jurisdictions. It is unknown whether any of these pending applications will issue to a patent. 4 Employees As of December 31, 2001, we had 50 full-time employees and we reduced our workforce to 40 full time employees in February 2002. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining unit with respect to his or her employment, and we have never experienced an organized work stoppage. We use consultants, contractors, and temporary workers to supplement our workforce and, as of February 20, 2002, we had one consultant. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES We currently sublease approximately 55,000 square feet of office, research and development and manufacturing space in San Jose, California. The sublease expires in April 2004, and we have an option to extend the term of the lease through October 2009. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS None ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None. 5 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Market Information for Common Stock Our common stock was traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol HYBR during the period from our initial public offering on November 12, 1997 through June 16, 1998. On June 17, 1998, trading in our common stock was suspended by the Nasdaq National Market, in response to our independent auditors, PWC, withdrawing their reports to our 1997 financial statements. The suspension continued until December 1, 1998, when our common stock was delisted by the Nasdaq National Market due to continuing noncompliance with listing requirements. From December 1, 1998 to July 5, 2000, our stock traded in the over-the-counter market on the pink sheets. On July 6, 2000, our stock was re-listed on the Nasdaq National Market. On August 30, 2001 our stock was moved from the Nasdaq National Market to the Nasdaq Small Cap Market due to our stock price and market capitalization falling below the Nasdaq National Market minimum requirements. The table below shows the range of high and low closing sale prices reported. The table reflects inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark down or commission. On March 13, 2002, the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Small Cap market was $0.11. See Risk Factors - IF WE ARE DELISTED FROM THE NASDAQ SMALL CAP MARKET, THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD DROP AND IT MAY BE MORE DIFFICULT TO TRADE OUR COMMON STOCK. High Low ---- --- First Quarter 2000........................................ $24.50 $8.00 Second Quarter 2000....................................... $13.50 $4.75 Third Quarter 2000........................................ $20.19 $5.56 Fourth Quarter 2000....................................... $18.75 $3.13 First Quarter 2001........................................ $6.94 $1.44 Second Quarter 2001....................................... $2.95 $0.50 Third Quarter 2001........................................ $2.25 $0.52 Fourth Quarter 2001....................................... $1.11 $0.40 Stockholders As of December 31, 2001, there were approximately 646 holders of record of our common stock Dividends We have not paid any cash dividends on our capital stock to date. The holders of Series K Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to an annual dividend at a rate of 6% out of funds legally available for payment of such dividends. As of December 31, 2001, the cumulative preferred stock dividend was $169,000. The terms of our outstanding debentures and our agreement with Sprint prohibit us from paying any cash dividends without the consent of the debenture holders and Sprint. 6 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and related notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

~~UNITED~~Years ~~STATES SECURITIES~~Ended ~~AND~~December ~~EXCHANGE~~31, ~~COMMISSION Washington~~-------------------------------------------------------------------- 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997(1) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Gross sales $ 28,666 D$ 29,924 $ 13,423 $ 12,418 $ 4,120 Sales discounts (740) (7,129) (407) -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net sales 27,926 22,795 13,016 12,418 4,120 Cost of sales 20,706 23,139 13,341 14,046 8,899 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Gross profit (loss) 7,220 (344) (325) (1,628) (4,779) Operating expenses: Research and development 6,986 6,715 4,191 7,771 7,831 Sales and marketing 2,800 16,491 1,740 3,642 4,678 General and administrative 5,422 11,625 7,660 8,933 2,964 Asset impairment charge -- -- -- 1,250 -- Write off of technology license -- -- -- 1,283 -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Total operating expenses 15,208 34,831 13,591 22,879 15,473 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Loss from operations (7,988) (35,175) (13,916) (24,507) (20,252) Interest income and other expense, net 120 (717) 171 779 316 Interest expense (2,649) (1,311) (8,447) (897) (1,666) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net loss $(10,517) $(37,203) $(22,192) $(24,625) $(21,602) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Preferred stock dividends (169) -- -- -- -- -------- Net loss available to common shareholders (10,686) (37,203) (22,192) (24,625) (21,602) ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.C48) $ (2.03) ~~20549~~ $ (2.08) $ (2.37) $ (6.10) ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== Shares used in basic and diluted per share calculation (2) 22,354 18,309 10,678 10,410 3,541 ======== ======== ======== ======== ========

~~FORM~~December 1031, -K ------------------------------------------------------------------ 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997(1) -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- BALANCE SHEET DATA: Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,506 $ 1,878 $ 13,394 $ 3,966 $ 27,143 Working capital 736 6,324 11,527 (812) 23,795 Total assets 11,219 19,664 21,152 15,420 39,065 Long-term debt 139 5,632 23,978 419 654 Total liabilities 8,803 16,707 30,972 12,718 11,762 Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (5,144) 2,957 (9,820) 2,702 27,303

(1) All financial data in the table above as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, as presented, reflect the restated financial statement. (2) See Note 3 of Notes to Financial Statements for an explanation of the number of shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share. 7 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The discussion below should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in item 8 of this report. The discussion contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or financial results, such as statements indicating that "we believe," "we expect," "we anticipate" or "we intend" that certain events may occur or certain trends may continue. Other forward-looking statements include statements about the future development of products or technologies, matters relating to our proprietary rights, facilities needs, our liquidity and capital needs and other statements about future matters. All these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. You should not rely too heavily on these statements; although they reflect the good faith judgment of our management, they involve future events that might not occur. We can only base such statements on facts and factors that we currently know. Our actual results could differ materially from those in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under "risk factors" and elsewhere in this report on form 10-k. Overview Liquidity Concerns During 2001, we refocused our targeted opportunities to the international markerplace as we adjusted to the abrupt downturn in the domestic markets, in particular Sprint Corporation's and certain other domestic operator's decision to cease the expansion of their deployments and to cease purchasing our products as a result. International opportunities have not developed as rapidly as we anticipated, and we believe that domestic and international revenues will be depressed for substantially all of 2002. As a result, we do not foresee sufficient revenues to meet our operating expenses. Our current liabilities, including a $5.5 million debenture due April 30, 2002, exceeded our cash and cash equivalents by approximately $4.2 million at December 31, 2001, and working capital at that date was only $736,000. If we cannot consummate a sale or merger on favorable terms we may be forced to seek protection under the federal bankruptcy laws. There is no assurance that we will be able to consummate a sale or merger or, even if we can do so, that the holders of our common stock or preferred stock will receive any net proceeds from such sale or merger. FOR OTHER IMPORTANT RISKS REGARDING OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OUR BUSINESS, SEE RISK FACTORS INCLUDED IN ITEM 7 OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K. Revenue Recognition We normally ship our products based upon a bona fide purchase order and volume purchase agreement. We recognize revenue at the time a transaction is shipped and collection of the resulting account receivable is probable. Shipments on customer orders with acceptance criteria, installation criteria or rights of return are recognized as revenue only when the criteria are satisfied. Revenue related to shipments to distributors is normally recognized upon receipt of payment for such transactions. As of December 31, 2001 the total amount of shipments not recognized as revenue due to acceptance or testing criteria or because they were sold to a distributor was $154,000. We generally sell our software together with a one-year technical support contract, for which we charge separately, to provide upgrades, maintenance, system support, and service. We recognize revenue on the software sale without reference to the maintenance contract, and we recognize revenue on the technical support contract over its term on a straight-line basis. Other service revenue, primarily training and consulting, is generally recognized at the time the service is performed. Warranty Costs We accrue for estimated warranty costs when the related sales revenue is recognized. Our modem manufacturer, Sharp Corporation, provides warranty on all cable routers manufactured by them. We provide a warranty that ranges between 12 and 18 months on all base station equipment and CPE equipment, and we typically provide a 90-day warranty on software media. Net Losses We incurred net losses for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, of $10,517,000, $37,203,000, and $22,192,000, respectively. Our accumulated deficit was $133,481,000 as of December 31, 2001. We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future. Results of Operations Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 NET SALES. After non-cash sales discounts of $740,000 in 2001, $7,129,000 in 2000, and $407,000 in 1999, net sales increased 23% to $27,926,000 in 2001, from $22,795,000 in 2000, and 115% from $13,016,000 in 1999. Non-cash sales discounts recorded in 2001 were in connection with the issuance of common stock purchase warrants 8 issued to Sprint. Broadband wireless system operators accounted for 99% of net sales in 2001, 94% in 2000, and 48% in 1999. Gross sales in 2001 declined approximately 4% from 2000 levels. The increase in net revenues from 2000 to 2001 is due to the substantial reduction in non-cash sales discounts in 2001 from 2000. In October 2001, Sprint announced that it was not pursuing any new fixed broadband wireless markets until a second-generation product could be evaluated. We do not currently have this type of second-generation product and in light of our liquidity concerns have suspended our efforts to develop or acquire this technology. In light of Sprint's decision and the delays we have encountered in developing international sales, we anticipate that our revenue in 2002 will be dramatically lower than in 2001. International sales accounted for less than 1% of net sales in 2001, 24% in 2000, and 5% in 1999. GROSS MARGIN. Gross margin was a positive 26% in 2001, negative 1.5% in 2000, and negative 2.5% in 1999. The improved gross margins from 2000 to 2001 were due to improved margins for customer premises equipment as a result of a price increase negotiated with Sprint. The improvement in gross margins from 1999 to 2000 was primarily due to an increase in the sales volume of higher margin, at that time, base station equipment as compared to total sales. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expenses include ongoing base station and software development expenses as well as design expenditures associated with new product development, new product production, manufacturing cost reduction programs and improvements in the manufacturing of existing products. Research and development expenses were $6,986,000, $6,715,000, and $4,191,000 for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Research and development expenses included non-cash charges of $277,000, $470,000, and $668,000 in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, for compensation recognized on stock options granted at exercise prices below fair market value to employees and consultants engaged in research and development. The increase in research and development expenses in 2001 as compared with 2000 was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs ($1,400,000), which was offset by decreases in the use of outside consultants ($600,000) and decreases in the use of research and development materials ($600,000) as development projects moved from engineering to manufacturing. The increase in research and development expenses in 2000 as compared to 1999 was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs of $1 million and an increase in fees for outside consultants of $1.1 million SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses include primarily salaries and related payroll costs for sales and marketing personnel, commissions, advertising, promotions and travel. Sales and marketing expenses were $2,800,000, $16,491,000, and $1,740,000, during 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Sales and marketing expenses included non-cash charges of $5,000, $47,000, and $88,000, in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, for compensation recognized on stock options granted at exercise prices below fair market value for employees and consultants engaged in sales and marketing. A non-cash charge of $13.7 million was recorded in 2000 as a customer acquisition expense in connection with the warrant granted to Sprint. Excluding this charge, sales and marketing expenses were essentially unchanged in 2001 as compared with 2000. The increase in sales and marketing expenses in 2000 as compared to 1999 was primarily due to the Sprint warrant charge ($13.7 million) and to an increase in consulting expenses ($500,000). GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses consist mainly of salaries and benefits for administrative officers and support personnel, travel expenses, and legal, accounting, and consulting fees. General and administrative expenses were $5,422,000, $11,625,000, and $7,660,000 during 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. General and administrative expenses included non-cash charges of $63,000, $287,000, and $219,000 during 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, for compensation recognized on stock options granted at exercise prices below fair market value to employees and consultants engaged in providing general and administrative services. The 2000 general and administrative expenses also included non-cash charges of $3,176,000 relating to the separation of two executives of the Company, and $2,000,000 in connection with the settlement of a lawsuit. No such charges were recorded to general and administrative expenses in either 2001 or 1999. In 2001, general and administrative expenses, excluding non-cash charges and allocated facilities expenses, increased $430,000 compared with 2000. Increases in allowance for bad debts, communications expense, directors fees, public relations and outside auditors, were partially offset by decreases in personnel and recruiting costs, and legal, consulting, and miscellaneous expenses. Excluding the non-cash charges described above, general and administrative expenses in 2000 decreased $1,279,000 compared to 1999. This decrease was due to reductions in legal fees ($2,600,000) that were offset in part by increases in personnel related costs ($700,000). 9 INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE) AND OTHER. The Company incurred net interest expense of $2,529,000, $2,028,000, and $8,276,000, in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. In 2001, net interest expense includes interest on debentures ($858,000), amortization of loan fees ($333,000), and amortization of the discount related to convertible debentures ($1,458,000). In August 1999, we issued $18.1 million of convertible debentures that were converted into common stock in June 2000. In 2000, net interest expense included a premium paid on the conversion of these debentures resulting in a beneficial conversion element valued at $1,170,000. In 1999, net interest expense included the amortization of the deemed discount on these debentures in the amount of $7.4 million and which was the result of the difference between the conversion price of the convertible debentures and the then market price of our common stock. Liquidity and Capital Resources Background Information We have had operating losses and negative cash flow since our inception. In light of the anticipated reduction in revenue in 2002, we expect to not have sufficient funds to operate our business through 2002. In addition, we do not have sufficient cash to repay the $5.5 million debenture upon its maturity in April 2002. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our continued existence as an independent company is dependent upon receiving additional funding to operate our business and repay debts upon maturity. We have no arrangements with respect to the receipt of any additional funding and there is no assurance that any such arrangement will be attained on acceptable terms. We are actively evaluating our strategic alternatives, including a sale or merger of the Company. Should we be unable to consummate a sale or merger on favorable terms, we may be forced to seek protection under the federal bankruptcy laws. In order to conserve cash reserves, we have reduced our selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses and other operating costs. In addition, we have implemented a focused control over capital expenditures, which should enable us to selectively deploy assets only in market areas with the greatest return potential. However, even after such reduction, we do not foresee that our revenues will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses. We have historically financed our operations primarily through a combination of debt, equity and equipment lease financing. In 1997, we raised $42.5 million in net proceeds through our initial public offering and other debt and equity financing. In September 1999, we raised $18.1 million through the issuance and sale of convertible debentures to Sprint (in the amount of $11.0 million) and certain venture capital sources (in the amount of $7.1 million). During the quarter ended June 30, 2000, at the request of the Company, the holders agreed to convert the entire principal, amounting to a face value of $18.1 million plus accrued interest through June 30, 2000 of $594,000, into 6,559,310 shares of common stock. Upon the conversion, we paid a premium, as an inducement to the holder's, equivalent to the interest that would have been added to the principal of the debentures for the third and fourth quarters of 2000, amounting to $375,750. The premium was paid in the form of additional shares of common stock calculated at the conversion price of $2.85 per share and was equivalent to 131,842 shares of common stock. Additionally, Sprint acquired warrants to purchase up to $8.4 million of additional convertible debentures, which debentures were convertible at December 31, 2001 into 2,946,622 shares of common stock on the same terms as the convertible debentures referred to above. The warrants were issued in consideration for Sprint's obligation to accept shipments of at least $10 million of our products. The amount of shipments in 2000 totaled at least $10,000,000. In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services are accounted for using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS 123. SFAS 123 requires that in each period in which the warrants are earned, a non-cash charge is to be recorded. Using the Black-Scholes valuation model, we determined that the estimated value of the warrant was $20.8 million. We applied $7.2 million of this amount as sales discounts during the four quarters of 2000 and the balance of $13.6 million was charged as an expense of the Sales and Marketing department over the first three quarters of 2000. Effective July 3, 2001, Sprint committed to purchase an additional $9.6 million of our products under terms that were different from those agreed to in the master purchase agreement dated May 1, 2000. In connection with this commitment, we issued to Sprint warrants to purchase up to 600,000 shares of our common stock at $1.20 per share. All of the shipments relating to these purchase warrants were made during the quarter ending September 30, 2001. These purchases were not subject to acceptance criteria. In accordance with SFAS 123 and utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model, we determined that the estimated value of these purchase warrants was $740,000 and this amount has been applied as a sales discount during the quarter ending September 30, 2001. There is no further committment from Sprint to purchase any of our products. Assuming that as of December 31, 2001, Sprint exercised all its warrants, it would own 7,613,068 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 29.0% of the 26,290,071 shares of our common stock that would then be outstanding (assuming no other security holders exercised their options, warrants or conversion privileges). On a fully diluted basis, assuming that as of December 31, 2001, all other security holders exercised their options, warrants and conversion privileges as well as Sprint, Sprint would own approximately 19.4% of the 39,164,930 fully diluted shares of our common stock that would then be outstanding. We have outstanding a senior secured convertible debenture in the face amount of $5.5 million due April 30, 2002 and bearing interest at 12% per annum, payable quarterly. The conversion price is subject to weighted average antidilution provisions whereby, if we issue shares in the future for consideration below the existing conversion price, then (with certain exceptions) the conversion price will automatically be decreased, allowing the holder of the debenture to receive additional shares of common stock upon conversion. Our obligations under this debenture are secured by a security interest granted to the debenture holder in substantialy all of our assets. We do not have sufficient cash to repay the debenture upon its maturity on April 30, 2002. 10 Under a securities purchase agreement between us and the Halifax Fund, a fund managed by the Palladin Group, we issued and sold to the Halifax Fund on February 16, 2001 securities, including: o a $7.5 million principal amount 6% convertible debenture due 2003, which was convertible into shares of our common stock; o a common stock purchase warrant to purchase 833,333 shares of common stock; o an adjustment warrant. In consideration for such securities, Halifax paid an initial purchase price of $7.5 million. We granted to Halifax in the purchase agreement, rights of first refusal, preemptive rights and other rights. We also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Halifax and agreed to register for resale all shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the debentures and upon exercise of the purchase warrant and adjustment warrant. In August 2001, we entered into an exchange agreement with Halifax by which we exchanged shares of our new Series K Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock for the debenture and adjustment warrant, which were cancelled in the exchange. The purchase warrant remained outstanding and was modified, primarily affecting our ability to require its exercise. Halifax did not pay any additional consideration in this exchange. We issued 7,560 shares of newly established Series K Preferred Stock. Each share of the preferred stock has an initial liquidation value of $1,000 and accretes additional value at the annual rate of 6% on June 30 and December 31 of each year. If any shares of preferred stock are still outstanding in February 2006, we are required to redeem those shares of preferred stock at their liquidation value in February 2006, although the holders of the preferred stock have the right to delay the redemption for up to 12 months. The redemption price is to be paid in cash or, at our election, in common stock valued at 95% of its volume weighted average prices during a pricing period centered on the redemption date. The preferred stock is convertible into our common stock. The preferred shares convert into a number of shares of common stock equal to the accreted liquidation value divided by the conversion price. For the first 1,875 shares of preferred stock, the conversion price is $1.25 per share, provided these preferred shares are converted prior to February 20, 2002. Thus, each of the first 1,875 shares will convert into 800 shares of common stock, before giving effect to the 6% accretion to the liquidation value, or a total of 1.5 million shares. The conversion price of the remaining shares is equal to the then applicable floor price plus one-half of the amount by which the volume weighted average price of our common stock for the trading day preceding the conversion exceeds the floor price. The floor price is initially equal to $1.25 and, provided that if we satisfy specific conditions, which include the continued listing of our common stock on an agreed upon market, at the end of the first pricing period the floor price will adjust to an amount equal to the average of the daily volume weighted average price of our common stock for a period of 15 consecutive trading days immediately following the end of the first pricing period. The floor price cannot be less than $1.25 or greater than $5.00. The maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of all of the preferred stock, before giving effect to the 6% annual accretion to the liquidation value, is 6,048,000, which would be the number of shares issued if the conversion price for all shares is $1.25. The exchange documents do provide for certain penalties, including reduction of the conversion price to the then current market value, if we do not satisfy covenants and conditions contained in the exchange documents. The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Topic No. D-98 addresses the classification and measurement of redeemable securities. In D-98, the EITF staff has issued an opinion that all of the events that could trigger redemption should be evaluated separately and that the possibility that any triggering event that is not solely within the control of the issuer could occur, without regard to probability, would require the security to be classified outside permanent equity. Accordingly, we have recorded the $7,560,000 of convertible preferred stock outside permanent equity on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2001 The Common Stock Purchase Warrant is exercisable by Halifax to purchase 833,333 shares of our common stock. If the closing bid price of our common stock is at least $3.50 per share, we may require Halifax to exercise the warrant, provided that specified conditions are satisfied, including that all preferred shares have either been converted or redeemed. The exercise price of the warrant would then be the lower of $9.00 per share or 94% of the volume weighted average price of our common stock, during the 20 consecutive trading days before the exercise of the warrant. 11 Sources and Uses of Cash Net cash used in operating activities was $4,463,000, $11,742,000, and $8,017,000, during 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. The net cash used in operating activities in 2001 was primarily due to our net loss of $10,517,000. The decrease in current assets of $8,138,000 was matched by the decrease in current liabilities of $8,174,000. Our loss for 2001 included a variety of non-cash items, including depreciation of $1,331,000 and amortization of the beneficial conversion of convertible debentures of $1,458,000. Net cash used in operating activities in 2000 was primarily the result of our net loss of $37,203,000 and an increase in net current assets related to operating activities of $9,517,000, offset by the beneficial conversion of convertible debentures of $20,800,000, non-cash compensation charges of $4,596,000 recognized on the grant of stock and stock options to employees and consultants at exercise prices which were lower than fair market on the date of grant, non-cash charges related to the issuance of stock for settlement of litigation of $2,000,000, non-cash charges related to the issuance of common stock to induce conversion of debentures of $1,170,000, and an increase in current liabilities of $5,698,000. The net cash used in operating activities in 1999 was primarily the result of our net loss of $22,192,000, partially offset by non-cash charges attributable to the amortization of a deemed discount on the debentures amounting to $7,394,000, depreciation and amortization charges of $1,323,000, non-cash compensation charges of $1,031,000, and a reduction in current operating assets of $3,158,000. Net cash used in investing activities was $699,000, $788,000, and $21,000, in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, and consisted of aggregate capital expenditures for property and equipment (primarily computers, leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and engineering test equipment). In the past, we have funded a substantial portion of our property and equipment expenditures from direct vendor leasing programs and third party commercial lease arrangements. At December 31, 2001, we did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures. Net cash provided by financing activities was $7,790,000, $1,014,000, and $17,981,000 in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2001 was primarily due to the $7.5 million raised in connection with the Halifax transaction described above plus the net proceeds due from the exercise of stock option of $319,000. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2000 was primarily due from the net proceeds of $1,349,000 from the exercise of stock options. Net cash provided by financing activities in 1999 was primarily due from proceeds from the issuance of convertible debentures and related common stock warrants and from issuance of common stock for $18,446,000, offset by repayment of capital lease obligations amounting to $465,000. At December 31, 2001, our liquidity consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $4,506,000. Our current liabilities, including a $5.5 million debenture due April 30, 2002, exceeded our cash and cash equivalents by approximately $4.2 million at December 31, 2001, and working capital at that date was only $736,000. Absent our receipt of financing, which we cannot currently foresee, we will not have sufficient cash to repay the $5.5 million debenture upon its maturity. In addition, in light of the anticipated reduction in revenue in 2002, we expect that we will consume cash in our operations at a greater rate than in 2001, and we believe that we do not have sufficient cash to support our operations throughout 2002, even without giving effect to the payment of the debenture. 12 Seasonality and Inflation We do not believe that our business is seasonal or is impacted by inflation. New Accounting Pronouncements In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141") and No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"). SFAS 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for under the purchase method. For all business combinations for which the date of acquisition is after June 30, 2001, SFAS 141 also establishes specific criteria for the recognition of intangible assets separately from goodwill and requires unallocated negative goodwill to be written off immediately as an extraordinary gain, rather than deferred and amortized. SFAS 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets after an acquisition. The most significant changes made by SFAS 142 are: 1) goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will no longer be amortized; 2) goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives must be tested for impairment at least annually; and 3) the amortization period for intangible assets with finite lives will no longer be limited to forty years. The Company does not believe that the adoption of these statements will have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In June 2001, the FASB also approved for issuance SFAS 143 "Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS 143 establishes accounting requirements for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets, including (1) the timing of the liability recognition, (2) initial measurement of the liability, (3) allocation of asset retirement cost to expense, (4) subsequent measurement of the liability and (5) financial statement disclosures. SFAS 143 requires that an asset retirement cost should be capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset and subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method. The Company will adopt the statement effective no later than January 1, 2003, as required. The transition adjustment resulting from the adoption of SFAS 143 will be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the effect of the adoption of this statement on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In October 2001, the FASB also approved SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS 144 replaces SFAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. The new accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale applies to all long-lived assets, including discontinued operations, and replaces the provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, for the disposal of segments of a business. Statement 144 requires that those long-lived assets be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. Therefore, discontinued operations will no longer be measured at net realizable value or include amounts for operating losses that have not yet occurred. Statement 144 also broadens the reporting of discontinued operations to include all components of an entity with operations that can be distinguished from the rest of the entity and that will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity in a disposal transaction. The provisions of Statement 144 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and, generally, are to be applied prospectively. At this time, the Company cannot estimate the effect of this statement on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. 13 Risk Factors An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this report on form 10-k before investing in our common stock. In the future, additional risks that we are not currently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may become important factors that affect our business. If any of the following risks occur, or if others occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be seriously harmed and the price of our common stock could decline. WE DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT CASH TO CONTINUE OUR OPERATIONS. Our current liabilities, including a $5.5 million debenture due April 30, 2002, exceeded our cash and cash equivalents by approximately $4.2 million at December 31, 2001, and working capital at that date was only $736,000. Absent our receipt of financing, which we cannot currently foresee, we will not have sufficient cash to repay the $5.5 million debenture upon its maturity. In addition, in light of the anticipated reduction in revenue in 2002, we expect that we will consume cash in our operations at a greater rate than in 2001, and we believe that we do not have sufficient cash to support our operations throughout 2002, even without giving effect to the payment of the debenture. We have had operating losses and negative cash flow since our inception. In light of the anticipated reduction in revenue in 2002, we expect to not have sufficient funds to operate our business through 2002. In addition, we do not have sufficient cash to repay the $5.5 million debenture upon its maturity in April 2002. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our continued existence as an independent company is dependent upon receiving additional funding to operate our business and repay debts upon maturity. We have no arrangements with respect to the receipt of any additional funding and there is no assurance that any such arrangement will be attained on acceptable terms. We are actively evaluating our strategic alternatives, including a sale or merger of the Company. Should we be unable to consummate a sale or merger on favorable terms, we may be forced to seek protection under the federal bankruptcy laws. There is no assurance that we will be able to consummate a sale or merger or, even if we can do so, that the holders of our common stock or preferred stock will receive any net proceeds from such sale or merger. In order to conserve cash reserves, we have reduced our selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses and other operating costs. In addition, we have implemented a focused control over capital expenditures, which should enable us to selectively deploy assets only in market areas with the greatest return potential. However, even after such reduction, we do not foresee that our revenues will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses and, therefore, we may be forced to seek protection under federal bankruptcy laws. OUR OUTSTANDING $5.5 MILLION DEBENTURE MATURES IN APRIL 2002, AND WE DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT CASH TO REPAY IT. We have outstanding a $5.5 million debenture that reaches maturity on April 30, 2002. This obligation is secured by substantially all of our assets, and we do not have sufficient cash to repay it when it becomes due. As a result, the debenture holder would be able to seek to claim our assets in fulfillment of this obligation and to take other steps to protect its position, including, potentially, making an involuntary bankruptcy filing against us. WE HAVE DEPENDED ON SPRINT FOR OUR BUSINESS IN RECENT YEARS, AND SPRINT HAS A GREAT DEAL OF INFLUENCE OVER OUR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Sprint, the largest MMDS license holder in the US, accounted for 88% of our net sales in the year ended December 31, 2001. In October 2001, Sprint announced that it has suspended any new deployments of broadband wireless equipment, as well as ceasing the acquisition of any new customers, until a second-generation system could be evaluated. We have only a small number of other customers. We expect virtually no revenue from Sprint in 2002. Sprint also has significant control over our corporate governance. For example, Sprint may designate two directors to serve on our board of directors. Further, we cannot issue any securities, with limited exceptions, or, in most cases, take important corporate action without Sprint's approval. Sprint has other rights and privileges, including a right of first refusal as to any proposed change in our control. This right of first refusal is assignable by Sprint to any third party. Further, if Sprint exercises warrants it currently holds, and assuming that no other warrant holders exercise, Sprint would beneficially own as of December 31, 2001, approximately 29% of our common stock. As a result, Sprint will have a great deal of influence on us in the future. We cannot be sure that Sprint will exercise this influence in our best interests, as Sprint's interests are in many respects different than ours. WE HAVE NOT BEEN PROFITABLE, AND WE EXPECT CONTINUING LOSSES IN THE FUTURE. We have not been profitable and may never achieve or sustain profitability. We were organized in 1990 and have had operating losses every year. Our accumulated deficit was $133,481,000 as of December 31, 2001. The potential of our business to produce revenue and profit is unproven. The market for our products has only recently begun to develop and is rapidly changing. In 2001 and early 2002, the market for telecommunications equipment has significantly declined. The broadband voice and data communication services market has an increasing number of competing technologies and competitors, and several of our competitors are significantly larger than us. WE DEPEND ON THE BROADBAND WIRELESS MARKET, WHICH IS A NEWLY DEVELOPING MARKET THAT IS SUBJECT TO UNCERTAINTIES. The wireless industry competes with other technologies, including cable and digital subscriber lines to provide high-speed Internet access. The cable modem and digital subscriber line technologies avoid the principal disadvantage of wireless, which requires some line-of-sight between the wireless operator's antenna and the customer's location. 14 Wireless system operators also face a number of licensing and regulatory restrictions. Conditions in the wireless market could change rapidly and significantly because of constant technological changes. Further, the development and market acceptance of alternative technologies could decrease the demand for our products. There can be no assurance that the wireless industry market will grow or that our products will be widely deployed in the emerging market. We expect to face substantial competition in this market, which could limit our sales and impair our business. In addition, during 2001, the market for telecommunications equipment declined significantly, which has adversely affected the entire telecommunications industry, including service providers, systems integrators, and equipment providers, and has reduced the business outlook and visibility of the industry. As a result, our business is being substantially harmed. WE FACE SIGNIFICANT COMPETITION, INCLUDING COMPETITION FROM LARGE COMPANIES. Our market is highly competitive. In the future, we anticipate that a small number of large competitors will compete for both domestic and international business. A number of smaller competitors claim that their new technologies will overcome line-of-sight limitations associated with current fixed broadband wireless systems. We cannot assure you that other competitors will not commercially launch systems or that other commercially launched systems will not provide benefits superior to ours. We have agreed with Sprint that in the future we will allow third parties to license our technology and we currently depend heavily on third parties to manufacture components that interface with our products to produce a full, working system. It is possible that these third parties may offer products that compete with ours, using our technology. This could create significant new competitive challenges for us and could limit our growth and harm our business. WE MAY BECOME INVOLVED IN LITIGATION OVER OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THAT COULD RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT COSTS AND MIGHT DIVERT THE ATTENTION OF OUR MANAGEMENT. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to determine the validity and scope of our patents, and to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. This litigation might result in substantial costs and could divert the attention of our management. Further, others may claim that our products infringe upon their proprietary rights. These claims, with or without merit, could result in significant litigation costs, diversion of the attention of our management and serious harm to our business. We may be required to enter into royalty and license agreements that may have terms that are disadvantageous to us. If litigation is successful against us, it could result in the invalidation of our proprietary rights and our incurring liability for damages, which could have a harmful effect on our business. In the past, we initiated one patent infringement litigation to enforce our patent rights. This litigation resulted in a settlement in which we granted licenses to the defendants containing terms that are in some respects favorable to them. For example, we granted to one of the defendants, Com21, Inc., a right of first refusal to purchase our patents. We may find it necessary to institute further infringement litigation, and third parties may institute litigation against us challenging the validity of our patents. WE RELY ON A SINGLE MANUFACTURER FOR OUR END-USER PRODUCTS AND ON LIMITED SOURCES FOR OUR COMPONENTS, SOME OF WHICH ARE BECOMING OBSOLETE We outsource manufacturing of our Series 2000 CPE products to a single manufacturer, Sharp Corporation, while maintaining only a limited manufacturing capability for pre-production assembly and testing. Since we have only one manufacturing source for our CPE products, our ability to reduce our manufacturing costs may be limited. We are dependent upon key suppliers for a number of other components within our Series 2000 products, including Texas Instruments, Hitachi, and Intel. There can be no assurance that these and other single-source components will continue to be available to us, or that deliveries to us will not be interrupted or delayed due to shortages. Having single-source components also makes it more difficult for us to reduce our costs for these components and makes us vulnerable to price increases by the component manufacturer. Any significant interruption or delay in the supply of components for our products or any increase in our costs for components could seriously harm our business. 15 OUR LONG SALES CYCLE MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR US TO FORECAST REVENUES, REQUIRES US TO INCUR HIGH SALES COSTS AND AGGRAVATES FLUCTUATIONS IN QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS. OUR SALES CYCLE MAY GET LONGER. Potential customers for our equipment usually want to perform significant technical evaluation before making a purchase. There are often delays resulting from our customers' internal procedures to approve the large capital expenditures that are typically involved in purchasing our products. This makes it difficult for us to predict revenue. Since we incur sales costs before we make a sale or recognize related revenues, the length and uncertainty of our sales cycle increases the volatility of our operating results because we have high costs without offsetting revenues. We have focused on expanding our international sales. There is a long cycle associated with vendor selection, evaluation, and, in many instances, trial system analyses in the international market. In addition, a number of small international operators have struggled with economic downturns that have affected their ability to secure capital. All of these factors indicate that we will have increased selling expenses and a lengthened sales cycle in the future. INTERNATIONAL SALES COULD INVOLVE GREATER RISKS. Although in the past we have sold most of our products in the United States and Canada, many of our new opportunities are being pursued internationally. However, international opportunities have not developed as rapidly as we anticipated and we believe that international sales will be depressed for substantially all of 2002. International sales will be subject to a number of risks, including longer payment cycles, export and import restrictions, foreign regulatory requirements, greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection, potentially adverse tax consequences, greater exposure to political and economic instability and reduced intellectual property protection. To increase our international coverage we work closely with systems integrators. However, some of our systems integrators do not represent our products exclusively. Further, the frequency spectrum and amount of spectrum available internationally varies from country to country. We currently depend on some of our systems integrators and other third party vendors to develop radio equipment that complies with local licenses, which may slow deployment in some international markets. WE MAY BE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual restrictions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. We cannot assure that our patents will cover all the aspects of our technology that require patent protection or that our patents will not be challenged or invalidated, or that the claims allowed in our patents may not be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage to us. We initiated one patent infringement lawsuit to enforce our rights, which resulted in a settlement. We do not know whether we will need to bring litigation in the future to assert our patent rights, or whether other companies will bring litigation challenging our patents. This litigation could be time consuming and costly and could result in our patents being held invalid or unenforceable. Even if the patents are upheld or are not challenged, third parties might be able to develop other technologies or products without infringing any of these patents. We have entered into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, and we enter into non-disclosure agreements with some of our suppliers, distributors, and customers, to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. These contractual arrangements or the other steps we take to protect our intellectual property may not be sufficient to prevent misappropriation of our technology or deter independent third-party development of similar technologies. The laws of foreign countries may not protect our products or intellectual property rights to the same extent, as the laws of the United States. We have in the past received, and may in the future receive, notices from persons claiming that our products, software or asserted proprietary rights infringe the proprietary rights of these persons. We expect that developers of wireless technologies will be increasingly subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors as our market grows. While we are not subject to any infringement claims, any future claim, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Royalty or licensing agreements might not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. DEFECTS IN OUR PRODUCTS COULD CAUSE PRODUCT RETURNS AND PRODUCT LIABILITY. Products as complex as ours frequently contain undetected errors, defects or failures, especially when introduced or when new versions are released. In the past, our products have contained these errors, and there can be no 16 assurance that errors will not be found in our current and future products. The occurrence of errors, defects or failures could result in product returns and other losses. They could also result in the loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products. These might also subject us to claims for product liability. IF WE ARE DE-LISTED FROM THE NASDAQ SMALL CAP MARKET, THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD DROP, AND IT MAY BE MORE DIFFICULT TO TRADE OUR COMMON STOCK. On August 30, 2001, the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel transferred the listing of our common stock from the Nasdaq National Market to the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. In order to maintain the Nasdaq Small Cap Market listing, we must have either: (1) stockholder equity of $2.5 million, (2) a market capitalization of $35 million , or (3) net income for the last fiscal year of $500,000. The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) has issued Topic No. D-98, which addresses the classification and measurement of redeemable securities. In compliance with the guidance in Topic No. D-98, we have recorded the Series K convertible preferred stock as "outside of permanent equity". While this resulted in our stockholder equity as reported on our unaudited balance sheet as of September 30, 2001, to be below the minimum standard set by Nasdaq, we were subsequently advised by Nasdaq that we were in compliance with this requirement. On February 14, 2002, we received a determination letter from the staff of Nasdaq indicating that we had failed to comply with the minimum bid price required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. If we cannot demonstrate that we can comply with this requirement for at least 10 consecutive trading days prior to August 13, 2002, the staff of Nasdaq will determine that either we have another 180 day grace period to achieve compliance, or that we will be delisted. De-listing of our common stock could reduce our stockholders' ability to buy or sell shares as quickly and as inexpensively as they have done historically. This reduced liquidity would make it more difficult for us to raise capital in the future. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to the change in liquidity and reduced publicity resulting from being de-listed from the Nasdaq National Market. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Not applicable. 17 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA Independent Auditor's Report ........................................... 19 Financial Statements: Balance Sheets as of December 31,2001 and 2000 ......................... 20 Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 .................................... 21 Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 ........................ 22 Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 .................................... 23 Notes to Financial Statements .......................................... 24 Supplementary Financial Data: Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited). Two years ended December 31, 2001 .............................................. 40 18 The Stockholders and Board of Directors Hybrid Networks, Inc. San Jose, California We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hybrid Networks, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An adudit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hybrid Networks, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Hybrid Networks, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 2, the Company has incurred recurring operating losses, since its inception, has a stockholder's deficit, and has a substantial need for working capital, including a need to repay a senior secured debenture of $5.5 due April 2002. Should the Company not be able to generate sufficient revenues or obtain additional financing, the Company in all likelihood will be forced to seek protection under the United States Bankruptcy Act. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP Certified Public Accountants Orange, California January 25, 2002 19 HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except per share data)

~~/x/~~December ~~ANNUAL~~31, ~~REPORT~~-------------------------- ~~PURSUANT~~2001 TO2000 ~~SECTION~~--------- 13--------- ORASSETS 15Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,506 $ 1,878 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $881 in 2001 and $200 in 2000 (dIncludes related party receivables of $5 and $6,164 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively) OF531 ~~THE~~7,699 ~~SECURITIES~~Inventories ~~EXCHANGE~~(Includes ~~ACT~~inventory OFsubject ~~1934~~to acceptance by related party of $0 and $2,472 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively) 3,843 7,303 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 520 519 --------- --------- Total current assets 9,400 17,399 Property and equipment, net 1,700 2,000 Intangibles and other assets 119 265 --------- --------- Total assets $ 11,219 $ 19,664 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) Current liabilities: Accounts payable 1,686 4,529 Convertible debenture 5,500 -- Current portion of capital lease obligations -- 29 Accrued liabilities and other (Includes deferred revenue from a related party of $0 and $3,710 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively) 1,478 6,517 --------- --------- Total current liabilities 8,664 11,075 Convertible debentures (Includes related party convertible debenture of $1 and $1 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively) 1 5,501 Other long-term liabilities 138 131 --------- --------- Total liabilities 8,803 16,707 --------- --------- Commitments and contingencies ( Notes 6,8, and 9) Series K convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value: 8 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001, no shares at December 31, 2000 (liquidation value $7,729 at December 31, 2001) 7,560 -- Stockholders' equity (deficit): Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value: Authorized: 4,992 shares; issued and outstanding: no shares in 2001 or 2000 -- -- Common stock, $.001 par value: Authorized: 100,000 shares; issued and outstanding 22,743 shares in 2001 and 21,935 shares in 2000 23 22 Additional paid-in capital 128,314 125,899 Accumulated deficit (133,481) (122,964) --------- --------- Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (5,144) 2,957 --------- --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 11,219 $ 19,664 ========= =========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 20 HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except per share data)

~~For~~Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------ 2001 2000 1999 -------- -------- -------- Net sales Products (Includes related party sales of $24,144, $8,910, and $99 for the ~~Year~~years ~~Ended~~ended December 31, 2001, 2000, or and 1999, respectively) $ 26,419 $ 21,711 $ 12,499 Services and software (Includes related party sales of $819, $263, and $28 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively) 1,507 1,084 517 -------- -------- -------- Total net sales 27,926 22,795 13,016 Cost of sales Products (Includes related party cost of sales of $16,880, $7,410, and $58 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively) 19,383 21,555 11,246 Services, software, and other cost of sales(Includes related party cost of sales of $0, $3,466, and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively) 1,323 1,584 2,095 -------- -------- -------- Total cost of sales 20,706 23,139 13,341 -------- -------- -------- Gross profit (loss) 7,220 (344) (325) -------- -------- -------- Operating expenses: Research and development (Includes related party expenses of $120, $0, and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively) 6,986 6,715 4,191 Sales and marketing (Includes expense of $0, $13,671, and $0 to record the fair value of warrants issued to a related party during the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively) 2,800 16,491 1,740 General and administrative 5,422 11,625 7,660 -------- -------- -------- Total operating expenses 15,208 34,831 13,591 -------- -------- -------- Loss from operations (7,988) (35,175) (13,916) Interest income and other expense (Includes expense for inducement to convert related party convertible debenture of $0, $711, and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively) 120 (717) 171 Interest expense (Includes related party interest expense of $0, $316, and $4,632 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively) (2,649) (1,311) (8,447) -------- -------- -------- Net loss $(10,517) $(37,203) $(22,192) ======== ======== ======== Preferred stock dividends (169) -- -- -------- -------- -------- Net loss available to common shareholders (10,686) (37,203) (22,192) -------- -------- -------- Basic and diluted loss per share $ (0.48) $ (2.03) $ (2.08) ======== ======== ======== Shares used in basic and diluted per share calculation 22,354 18,309 10,678 ======== ======== ========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 21 HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (in thousands)

/For /the ~~TRANSITION~~Years ~~REPORT~~Ended ~~PURSUANT~~December TO31, ~~SECTION~~2001, 132000, ORand 151999. ------------------------------------------------------ Common Stock Additional Compre- Accumu- Compre- ------------------ Paid-in hensive lated hensive Shares Amount Capital Income(dloss) OFDeficit ~~THE~~Total ~~SECURITIES~~Loss ~~EXCHANGE~~------ ~~ACT~~------ OF------- ~~1934~~------------ ------- ----- ---- Balances, January 1, 1999 10,473 $ 10 $ 66,261 $ -- $ (63,569) $ 2,702 Exercise of common stock options 251 -- 345 -- -- 345 Stock issued for services 7 -- 56 -- -- 56 Sales discount recognized on issuance of warrants to customers -- -- 407 -- -- 407 Compensation recognized on issuance of stock options -- -- 975 -- -- 975 Class action settlement stock issued 750 1 385 -- -- 386 Discount related to beneficial conversion of notes -- -- 7,394 -- -- 7,394 Unrealized gain on investments -- -- -- 107 -- 107 $ 107 Net loss -- -- -- -- (22,192) (22,192) (22,192) --------- Comprehensive loss -- -- -- -- -- -- $ (22,085) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ========= Balances, December 31, 1999 11,481 11 75,823 107 (85,761) (9,820) Exercise of common stock options 1,181 1 1,348 -- -- 1,349 Exercise of warrants 71 1 -- -- -- 1 Convertible debt conversion 6,691 7 19,930 -- -- 19,937 Stock Bonus 3 -- 27 -- -- 27 Sales discount recognized on issuance of warrants to customer -- -- 20,800 -- -- 20,800 Compensation recognized on issuance of stock options -- -- 4,596 -- -- 4,596 Class action and other lawsuit settlement stock issued 2,508 2 3,301 -- -- 3,303 Discount related to beneficial conversion of notes -- -- 74 -- -- 74 Unrealized gain on investments -- -- -- (107) -- (107) $ (107) Net loss -- -- -- -- (37,203) (37,203) (37,203) --------- Comprehensive loss -- -- -- -- -- -- $ (37,310) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ========= Balances, December 31, 2000 21,935 22 125,899 -- (122,964) 2,957 Exercise of common stock options 401 1 273 -- -- 274 Exercise of warrants 90 -- 45 -- -- 45 Stock bonus 317 -- 255 -- -- 255 Sale discount recognized on issuance of warrants to customer -- -- 740 -- -- 740 Compensation recognized on issuance of stock options -- -- 400 -- -- 400 Discount related to beneficial conversion of notes -- -- 5,999 -- -- 5,999 Issuance of Series K preferred stock upon exchange of debenture -- -- (5,297) (5,297) Net loss -- -- -- -- (10,517) (10,517) $ (10,517) --------- Comprehensive loss -- -- -- -- -- -- $ (10,517) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ========= Balances, December 31, 2001 22,743 $ 23 $ 128,314 $ -- $(133,481) $ (5,144) ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 22 HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands)

~~For~~Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------------------ 2001 2000 1999 -------- -------- -------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $(10,517) $(37,203) $(22,192) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 1,331 1,139 1,323 Amortization of discount related to beneficial conversion feature (Includes related party amounts of $4,494 for the ~~transition~~year ~~period~~ended December 31, 1999) -- -- 7,394 Issuance of stock for settlement of litigation -- 2,000 -- Warranty allowance 368 432 108 Provision for doubtful accounts 681 -- -- Provision for excess and obsolete inventory 866 235 529 Compensation recognized upon issuance of stock and stock options 412 4,596 1,031 Common stock issued to induce conversion of debenture (Includes stock issued to a related party of $711 for the year ended December 31, 2000) -- 1,170 -- Amortization of beneficial conversion of convertible debentures (Includes related party amount of $90 for the year ended December 31, 2000) 1,458 149 -- Sales discounts recognized on issuance of warrants to customers (Includes discounts for a related party of $740 and $20,800 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively) 740 20,800 407 Stock issued for services 174 27 -- Interest added to principal of convertible debentures (Includes interest for a related party of $226 and $138 for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively) 60 368 226 Gain on available for sale of securities -- (107) 107 Change in assets and liabilities: Restricted cash -- -- 515 Accounts receivable 6,487 (6,561) 295 Inventories 2,594 (3,783) 940 Prepaid expenses and other current assets (943) (270) 630 Accounts payable (2,844) 2,494 (28) Other long term liabilities 8 8 68 Accrued liabilities and other (5,338) 2,764 630 -------- -------- -------- Net cash used in operating activities (4,463) (11,742) (8,017) -------- -------- -------- Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of property and equipment (699) (788) (21) -------- -------- -------- Net cash used in investing activities (699) (788) (21) -------- -------- -------- Cash flows from financing activities: Repayment of capital lease obligations (29) (335) (465) Proceeds from issuance of convertible debenture 7,500 -- -- Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants 319 1,349 345 Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures and related common stock warrants (Includes related party amount of $11,139 for the year ended December 31, 1999) -- -- 18,101 -------- -------- -------- Net cash provided by financing activities 7,790 1,014 17,981 -------- -------- -------- Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,628 (11,516) 9,943 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 1,878 13,394 3,451 -------- -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 4,506 $ 1,878 $ 13,394 ======== ======== ======== SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Common stock issued to . settle class action liability $ -- $ 1,303 $ 386 Common stock issued to settle bonus accrual 68 -- -- Preferred stock issued upon converseion of convertible debentures 2,263 -- -- Common stock issued in conversion of convertible debt -- 18,694 -- SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Interest paid 841 855 710 Income taxes paid -- -- --

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 23 HYBRID NETWORKS, INC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. FORMATION AND BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY The Company, which was incorporated in Delaware on June 6, 1990, is a fixed broadband access equipment company that designs, develops, manufactures and markets wireless systems that provide high-speed access to the Internet and corporate intranets for both businesses and consumers. The Company's products remove the bottleneck over the local connection to the end user that causes slow response time for those accessing bandwidth intensive information. 2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The Company was organized in 1990 and has had operating losses since then. The Company's accumulated deficit was $133,481,000 as of December 31, 2001, and $122,964,000 as of December 31, 2000. Although the Company has raised large sums of capital in the past, including over $35 million in net proceeds from its initial public offering in November 1997, over $18 million from the issuance and sale of convertible debentures in September 1999, and $7.5 million from a fund of the Palladin Group in February 2001, its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on obtaining additional financing to fund its current operations and to meet a short term obligation that comes due April 30, 2002. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts. At December 31, 2001, the Company's liquidity consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $4,506,000 and working capital of $736,000. The Company's indebtedness partially consists of $5.5 million in convertible debentures that are due April 30, 2002. We have had operating losses and negative cash flow since our inception. In light of the anticipated reduction in revenue in 2002, we expect to not have sufficient funds to operate our business through 2002. In addition, we do not have sufficient cash to repay the $5.5 million debenture upon its maturity in April 2002. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our continued existence as an independent company is dependent upon receiving additional funding to operate our business and repay debts upon maturity. We have no arrangements in place with respect to the receipt of any additional funding. We are actively evaluating our strategic alternatives, including a sale or merger of the Company. Should we be unable to consummate a sale or merger on favorable terms, we may be forced to seek protection under the federal bankruptcy laws. The accompanying financial statements do not purport to reflect or provide for the consequences of a possible bankruptcy proceeding. In particular, such financial statements do not porport to show (a) as to assets, their realizable value on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy liabilities; (b) as to liabilities, the amount that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the status and priority thereof; (c) as to stockholder accounts; the effect of any changes that may be made in the capitalization of the Comapny; and (d) as to operations, the effect of any changes that may be made in its business. In order to conserve cash reserves, we have reduced our selling, general and administrative expenses, research and development expenses and other operating costs. In addition, we have implemented a focused control over capital expenditures, which should enable us to selectively deploy assets only in market areas with the greatest return potential. 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company's financial statements are based upon a number of significant estimates, including the estimated useful lives selected for property and equipment, accrued liabilities related to product warranties and litigation, and valuation allowances for accounts receivable, inventory and property and equipment. Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that these estimates will be further revised in the near term and such revisions could be material. 24 Fair Value of Financial Instruments The estimated fair values for financial instruments under SFAS No. 107 "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments," are determined at discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The fair values of convertible debentures are based upon borrowing rates that are available to the Company for obligations with similar terms, collateral, and maturity. At December 31, 2001, the estimated fair value of these liabilities approximates their carrying values. Business Risks and Credit Concentration The Company sells its products primarily to broadband wireless system operators principally in North America. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does not require collateral. The Company also maintains allowances for potential losses on collectability of accounts receivable, as needed, and such losses have been within management's expectations. The Company operates in the intensely competitive and rapidly changing communications industry, which has been characterized, by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, and federal, state and local regulation, which may impede the Company's penetration of certain markets. The Company currently operates in one industry segment with one product line. The Company's future success depends upon its ability to develop, introduce, and market new products, its ability to obtain components from key suppliers, obtaining sufficient manufacturing capacity, and the success of the broadband access business. The Company may experience future fluctuations in operating results and declines in selling prices. Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counter parties failed completely to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk (whether on or off balance sheet) that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or groups of counter parties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly effected by changes in economic or other conditions. In accordance with SFAS No. 105, "Disclosure of Information about Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk and Financial Instruments with Concentrations of Credit Risk," financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consist of cash balances maintained in excess of federal depository insurance limits, investments in commercial paper (which are classified as cash equivalents), and accounts receivable, which have no collateral or security. The Company derived 88% of its revenue in 2001 from one customer and this concentration represents a risk to the Company. Sales to this customer in 2002 are expected to be negligible. Should the Company be unable to replace this business with sales to alternative customers, there would be a negative impact on the Company. In accordance with SFAS No. 105, disclosure is required of significant concentrations of credit risk from one or more counter parties for all financial instruments. The Company had accounts receivable from one customer at December 31, 2001 that represented 31% of total accounts receivable. The inability to collect receivables from this customer would have a significant negative impact on the Company. Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investment instruments with maturity at the time of purchase of three months or less. Instruments with maturity at the time of purchase of greater than three months but less than one year from the date of purchase are included in short-term investments. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market. 25 Property and Equipment Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of two to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the lease term. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred. Material expenditures, which increase the life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset. The cost of fixed assets sold, or otherwise disposed of, and the related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the accounts, and any gains or losses are reflected in current operations. Intangibles and Other Assets At December 31, 2001 and 2000, intangibles and other assets included deferred financing costs relating to fees incurred in connection with the issuance of a senior convertible debenture in April 1997. The deferred financing costs are amortized over the five-year life of the debenture (see Note 6). Total accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 was $427,000 and $320,000, respectively. At December 31, 1997, intangibles also included the value assigned to the purchase of certain technologies relating to a technology support and development agreement signed in November 1997. In connection with entering into the technology support and development agreement, the Company issued a five-year warrant to purchase 458,295 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.91 per share. The amount attributed to the value of the warrants was $2,200,000. The Company periodically assesses the recoverability of intangible assets by determining whether the amortization of the asset balance over the remaining life can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows and is recognized as a write down of the asset to a net realizable value. The unamortized value of the technologies of approximately $1,283,000 was charged to expense in the second quarter of 1998 as it was determined to be of no further value to the Company. Revenue Recognition We normally ship our products based upon a bona fide purchase order and volume purchase agreement. We recognize revenue at the time a transaction is shipped and collection of the resulting account receivable is probable. Shipments on customer orders with acceptance criteria, installation criteria or rights of return are recognized as revenue only when the criteria are satisfied. Revenue related to shipments to distributors is normally recognized upon receipt of payment for such transactions. As of December 31, 2001 the total amount of shipments not recognized as revenue due to acceptance or testing criteria or because they were sold to a distributor was $154,000. We generally sell our software together with a one-year technical support contract, for which we charge separately, to provide upgrades, maintenance, system support and service. We recognize revenue on the software sale without reference to the maintenance contract, and we recognize revenue on the technical support contract over its term on a straight-line basis. Other service revenue, primarily training, is generally recognized at the time the service is performed. In September 1999, Sprint committed to purchase $10 million of our products subject to certain conditions. In connection with Sprint's commitment, we issued to Sprint warrants to purchase up to $8,397,873 in debentures that are convertible into 2,946,622 shares of our common stock at $2.85 per share. In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services are accounted for using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS 123. SFAS 123 requires that in each period in which the warrants are earned, a non-cash charge is to be recorded. Using the Black-Scholes valuation model, we determined that the estimated value of the warrant was $20.8 million. We applied $7.2 million of this amount as sales discounts during the four quarters of 2000 and the balance of $13.6 million was charged as an expense of the Sales and Marketing department over the first three quarters of 2000. Effective July 3, 2001, Sprint committed to purchase an additional $9.6 million of our products under terms that were different from those agreed to in the master purchase agreement dated May 1, 2000. In connection with this new commitment, we issued to Sprint warrants to purchase up to 600,000 shares of our common stock at $1.20 per share. All of the shipments relating to these purchase warrants were made during the quarter ending September 30, 2001. These purchases were not subject to acceptance criteria. In accordance with SFAS 123, and utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model, we determined that the estimated value of these purchase warrants was $740,000 and this amount has been applied as a sales discount during the year ending December 31, 2001. 26 Product Development Costs Costs related to research, design and development of products are charged to research and development expenses as incurred. Software development costs are included in research and development and are expensed as incurred. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86 (SFAS 86) requires the capitalization of certain software development costs from when technological feasibility is established, which the Company defines as completion of a working model and when the software is available for sale to the Company's customers. The capitalized cost is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated product life, or on the ratio of current revenues to total projected product revenues, whichever is greater. To date, the period between achieving technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been short and software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any software development costs. Stock-Based Compensation The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Company will disclose the impact of adopting the fair value accounting of employee stock options. Transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services have been accounted for using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS 123. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the difference are expected to reverse. Computation of Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. All such securities or other contracts were anti-dilutive for all periods presented and, therefore, excluded from the computation of loss per share. Comprehensive Income (Loss) Effective January 1, 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 (SFAS 130), "Reporting Comprehensive Income." SFAS 130 requires that all items recognized under accounting standards as comprehensive income be reported in an annual financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other annual financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. Examples of items to be included in comprehensive income, which are excluded from net income (loss), include foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gain/loss on available-for-sale securities. The Company has presented comprehensive income (loss) for each period presented within the Statement of Stockholder's Equity (Deficit). New Accounting Pronouncements In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141") and No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"). SFAS 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for under the purchase method. For all business combinations for which the date of acquisition is after June 30, 2001, SFAS 141 also establishes specific criteria for the recognition of intangible assets separately from goodwill and requires unallocated negative goodwill to be written off immediately as an extraordinary gain, rather than deferred and amortized. SFAS 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets after an acquisition. The most significant changes made by SFAS 142 are: 1) goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will no longer be amortized; 2) goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives must be tested for impairment at least annually; and 3) the amortization period for intangible assets with finite lives will no longer be limited to forty years. The Company does not believe that the adoption of these statements will have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. 27 In June 2001, the FASB also approved for issuance SFAS 143 "Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS 143 establishes accounting requirements for retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets, including (1) the timing of the liability recognition, (2) initial measurement of the liability, (3) allocation of asset retirement cost to expense, (4) subsequent measurement of the liability and (5) financial statement disclosures. SFAS 143 requires that an asset retirement cost should be capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived asset and subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and rational method. The Company will adopt the statement effective no later than January 1, 2003, as required. The transition adjustment resulting from the adoption of SFAS 143 will be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. At this time, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the effect of the adoption of this statement on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In October 2001, the FASB also approved SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS 144 replaces SFAS 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. The new accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale applies to all long-lived assets, including discontinued operations, and replaces the provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, for the disposal of segments of a business. Statement 144 requires that those long-lived assets be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, whether reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. Therefore, discontinued operations will no longer be measured at net realizable value or include amounts for operating losses that have not yet occurred. Statement 144 also broadens the reporting of discontinued operations to include all components of an entity with operations that can be distinguished from the rest of the entity and that will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity in a disposal transaction. The provisions of Statement 144 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and, generally, are to be applied prospectively. At this time, the Company cannot estimate the effect of this statement on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. 4. INVENTORIES Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands): 2001 2000 --------- -------- Raw materials $ 2,860 $ 2,633 Work in progress 483 1,144 Finished goods 500 3,526 --------- -------- $ 3,843 $ 7,303 ========= ======== At December 31, 2001 and 2000, finished goods inventory included $141,000 and $2,730,000, respectively, of equipment that had been shipped to customers but for such shipments the related revenue was deferred pending final customer acceptance. The allowance for excess and obsolete inventory at December 31, 2001 and 2000 was $1,889,000 and $1,980,000, respectively. The provision for excess and obsolete inventory included in cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 was $ 866,000 and $235,000, respectively. 28 5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands): December 31, -------------------- 2001 2000 -------- -------- Machinery and equipment $ 4,218 $ 3,828 Office furniture and fixtures 1,036 747 Leasehold improvements 1,934 1,922 -------- -------- 7,188 6,497 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (5,488) (4,497) -------- -------- $ 1,700 $ 2,000 ======== ======== Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 was $999,000, $1,139,000, and $1,215,000, respectively. 6. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES AND PREFERRED STOCK We have outstanding a senior secured convertible debenture in the face amount of $5.5 million due in April 2002 and bearing interest at 12% per annum, payable quarterly. The conversion price is subject to weighted average antidilution provisions whereby, if we issue shares in the future for consideration below the existing conversion price, then (with certain exceptions) the conversion price will automatically be decreased, allowing the holder of the debenture to receive additional shares of common stock upon conversion. Under a securities purchase agreement between us and the Halifax Fund, a fund managed by the Palladin Group, we issued and sold to the Halifax Fund on February 16, 2001 securities, including: o a $7.5 million principal amount 6% convertible debenture due 2003, which was convertible into shares of our common stock; o a common stock purchase warrant to purchase 833,333 shares of common stock; and o an adjustment warrant. In consideration for such securities, Halifax paid an initial purchase price of $7.5 million. We granted to Halifax in the purchase agreement, rights of first refusal, preemptive rights and other rights. We also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Halifax and agreed to register for resale all shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the debentures and upon exercise of the purchase warrant and adjustment warrant. In August 2001, we entered into an exchange agreement with Halifax by which we exchanged shares of our new Series K Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock for the debenture and adjustment warrant, which were cancelled in the exchange. The purchase warrant remained outstanding and was modified, primarily affecting our ability to require its exercise. Halifax did not pay any additional consideration in this exchange. We issued 7,560 shares of newly established Series K Preferred Stock. Each share of the preferred stock has an initial liquidation value of $1,000 and accretes additional value at the annual rate of 6% on June 30 and December 31 of each year. If any shares of preferred stock are still outstanding on February 2006, we are required to redeem those shares of preferred stock at their liquidation value in February 2006, although the holders of the preferred stock have the right to delay the redemption for up to 12 months. The redemption price is to be paid in cash or, at our election, in common stock valued at 95% of its volume weighted average prices during a pricing period centered on the redemption date. 29 The preferred stock is convertible into our common stock. The preferred shares convert into a number of shares of common stock equal to the accreted liquidation value divided by the conversion price. For the first 1,875 shares of preferred stock, the conversion price is $1.25 per share, provided these preferred shares are converted prior to February 20, 2002. Thus, each of the first 1,875 shares will convert into 800 shares of common stock, before giving effect to the 6% accretion to the liquidation value, or a total of 1.5 million shares. The conversion price of the remaining shares is equal to the then applicable floor price plus one-half of the amount by which the volume weighted average price of our common stock for the trading day preceding the conversion exceeds the floor price. The floor price is initially equal to $1.25, and provided that if we satisfy specific conditions, which include the continued listing of our common stock on an agreed upon market, at the end of the first pricing period the floor price will adjust to an amount equal to the average of the daily volume weighted average price of our common stock for a period of 15 consecutive trading days immediately following the end of the first pricing period. The floor price cannot be less than $1.25 or greater than $5.00. The maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of all of the preferred stock, before giving effect to the 6% annual accretion to the liquidation value, is 6,048,000, which would be the number of shares issued if the conversion price for all shares is $1.25. The exchange documents do provide for certain penalties, including reduction of the conversion price to the then current market value, if we do not satisfy covenants and conditions contained in the exchange documents. Assuming certain conditions are met, we have the right to compel conversion of the preferred shares. If the closing price for our stock is above $6.3212 per share for at least 20 out of 30 trading days, we can require the holders to convert the preferred shares, provided that the volume weighted average price of our common stock is equal to or greater than the conversion price on the day that we give notice of the required conversion through the date of conversion. Further, if the closing bid price for our common stock is equal to or greater than 120% of the conversion price on a given day, we can require the conversion of preferred shares, up to the forced conversion limit, during the 10 trading day period following the day we give notice of the required conversion. The forced conversion limit is a number of shares of common stock equal to 10% of the total number of shares of common stock traded during the 10 day period following our giving this notice, excluding from this total specified block trades, transactions that are not bona fide transactions between unaffiliated parties and any shares traded on a day when there is a trading price less then 120% of the conversion price in effect on that day. We also have the right to redeem the preferred shares for cash. The redemption price is equal to the greater of 120% of the liquidation value of the preferred shares, or 120% of the then current market value of the common stock into which the preferred stock is then convertible. If more than 2.5 million common shares have then been issued upon conversion of the preferred stock, the redemption price is equal to the liquidation value. The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Topic No. D-98 addresses the classification and measurement of redeemable securities. In D-98, the EITF staff has issued an opinion that all of the events that could trigger redemption should be evaluated separately and that the possibility that any triggering event that is not solely within the control of the issuer could occur, without regard to probability, would require the security to be classified outside permanent equity. Accordingly, we have recorded the $7,560,000 of convertible preferred stock outside permanent equity on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2001. Issuances of Securities to Sprint Corporation and to Other Investors In September 1999, the Company issued to Sprint Corporation ("Sprint") a convertible debenture in the face amount of $11 million due in 2009 and bearing interest at 4% per annum, compounded monthly (the "Sprint Debenture"). The Sprint Debenture was convertible at any time after December 31, 1999, at Sprint's option, into 3,907,775 shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $2.85 per share (subject to adjustment and including accrued interest). At any time on or after December 31, 2000, the Company could require the conversion of the Sprint Debenture. Concurrently with the issuance of the foregoing securities to Sprint, the Company issued to certain other investors for $7.1 million convertible debentures in the face amount of $7.1 million due in 2009 and bearing interest at 4% per annum, compounded monthly (accrued interest is automatically added to principal quarterly). These debentures had substantially the same terms as the Sprint Debenture. Like the Sprint Debenture, these debentures were exercisable by the holders at any time after December 31, 1999, at their option, into 2,522,291 shares of the Company's common stock (subject to adjustment and including accrued interest). At any time on or after December 31, 2000, the Company could require the conversion of the debentures. The conversion price was $2.85. The investors that purchased the debentures were (i) partnerships associated with a firm of which a director of the Company is an 30 executive partner; (ii) a partnership managed by a firm of which a former director (who was a director at the time of the investment) is a general partner; and (iii) an individual who is a director of the Company. During the quarter ended June 30, 2000, at the request of the Company, the holders agreed to convert the entire principal amounting to a face value of $18.1 million plus accrued interest through June 30, 2000, of $594,000, into 6,559,310 shares of common stock. Upon the conversion, we paid a premium as an inducement to the holders' equivalent to the interest that would have been added to the principal of the debentures for the third and fourth quarters of 2000, amounting to $375,750. The premium was paid in the form of additional shares of common stock calculated at the conversion price of $2.85 per share and was equivalent to 131,842 shares of common stock. The fair value of the stock was $8.87 per share at the time the premium was paid creating a beneficial conversion element valued at $1,170,000, which was recorded to interest expense at June 30, 2000. In September 1999, at the time of Sprint's purchase of our debentures, we issued to Sprint, warrants to purchase up to $8.4 million of additional convertible debentures (subject to the shipment of up to $10 million of products and services pursuant to purchase orders) which debentures will be convertible into up to 2,946,622 shares of our common stock on the same terms and conditions as the convertible debentures referred to above. Ten percent of the warrants became exercisable on the shipment dates when aggregate shipments of products and services pursuant to purchase orders submitted by Sprint to the Company were at least $1 million. With each additional $1 million of shipments, Sprint was entitled to exercise an additional 10% of the warrants until the aggregate shipments were $10,000,000. In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services are accounted for using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS 123. SFAS 123 requires that in each period in which the warrants are earned, a non-cash charge will be recorded. The amount of such shipments during the year ended December 31, 2000 reached the $10,000,000 maximum and, based on the warrants' conversion ratio, this amount gave Sprint the right to receive 2,946,622 shares of the Company's common stock under the warrants, if exercised in full. The final value of this purchase right, using the Black-Scholes valuation model, was $20,800,000. Of this amount, $7,129,000 was recorded as a direct sales discount to offset recognized sales to Sprint. The balance of $13,671,000 was recorded as an operating expense of the Sales and Marketing department. In August 2001, the Company issued to Sprint Corporation warrants to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.20 per share in connection with a volume purchase agreement. The fair value of the warrants of $740,000 was recorded as a discount on sales. Assuming as of December 31, 2001, that Sprint would exercise all of its purchase warrants, it would own 7,613,068 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 29.0% of the 26,290,071 shares of our common stock that would then be outstanding (assuming no other security holders exercised their options, warrants or conversion privileges). On a fully diluted basis, assuming that as of December 31, 2001, all other security holders exercised their options, warrants and conversion privileges as well as Sprint, Sprint would own approximately 19.4% of the 39,164,930 fully diluted shares of our common stock that would then be outstanding. In addition, under the terms of our agreements with Sprint, Sprint has substantial rights with respect to our corporate governance. Two of our directors are Sprint designees, and we cannot issue any securities (with limited exceptions) or, in most cases, take any material corporate action without Sprint's approval. Sprint has other rights and privileges as well, including pre-emptive rights and a right of first refusal in the case of any proposed change of control transaction, which right of first refusal is assignable by Sprint to any third party. The Company also issued to Sprint in September 1999 a $1,000 debenture due in 2009, which is convertible by Sprint at any time into a newly created Series J preferred stock of the Company. Under the purchase agreement for the debentures and under the terms of the Series J preferred stock, Sprint has the right to elect two directors to the Company's board of directors and Sprint's approval will be required for many types of decisions involving corporate governance (including veto rights over most material actions the Company might take, see Note 10 below). In addition, Sprint has certain rights of first refusal and preemptive rights in respect of certain issuance's of securities by the Company and other rights, including a right of first refusal with respect to any change of control agreement (as defined), which right of first refusal it can assign to third parties. 31 7. ACCRUED LIABILITIES AND OTHER Accrued liabilities and other consists of the following (in thousands): 2001 2000 -------- -------- Accrued payroll and related accruals $ 405 $ 813 Accrued class action settlement and related legal expenses 100 775 Deferred revenue and customer deposits 178 3,916 Other liabilities 795 1,013 -------- -------- $ 1,478 $ 6,517 ======== ======== Loss Contingencies As required by SFAS No. 5 "Accounting for Contingencies", the Company records liabilities for loss contingencies, including those arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties, and other sources when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. At December 31, 2001, the Company has accrued $87,000 for loss contingencies arising from litigation, which, in the opinion of management, are probable and reasonably estimable. This accrual includes an estimate of future legal costs based on opinions of legal counsel and our experience in related cases. The amounts accrued for pending litigation in prior periods was $775,000 and $2,946,000 at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The amounts charged to operations in connection with actual litigation expenses were $22,900, $2,688,000, and $3,312,000, for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. In addition, and based on opinions of legal counsel, management reduced the amounts accrued for estimated future legal expenses by $652,000 and $381,300 during 2001 and 2000, respectively. 8. COMMITMENTS Lease Obligations The Company's only long-term operating lease is for approximately 55,000 square feet of office, research and development, and manufacturing space in San Jose, CA. This sublease expires in April 2004. Future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable leases are as follows (in thousands): Operating Lease ------- 2002 $ 952 2003 975 2004 406 Thereafter -- ------- $ 2,333 ======= Rent expense for 2001, 2000, and 1999 was approximately $962,000, $926,000, and $1,064,000, respectively. 32 Employment Agreements The Company has entered into employment agreements with two officers, and a change of control bonus agreement with one officer. The agreements provide for aggregate annual salaries of $475,000 until the employee voluntarily terminates or renegotiates the agreement. The agreements may be canceled at any time for cause. If the Company terminates the agreements for reasons other than cause, aggregate severance due under the agreements would be $355,000. The change of control bonus agreement provides for a payment of $500,000 to one officer in the event of a change of control. 9. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred Stock The Board of Directors has authorized the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and the Board has the authority to issue the undesignated preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof. In August 2001, the Board authorized a Series K preferred stock in the amount of 7,560 shares designated Series K Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. The Series K preferred stock is subject to the following terms and provisions: o Dividends accrue at the rate of 6% per annum of the liquidation value of each share, payable on June 30 and December 31 of each year and are in preference of any dividends payable on common shares. The liquidation value of each share is $1,000 plus any accreted dividends. o Dividends will automatically be added to the liquidation value of each share unless paid in cash. o Shares are convertible into common stock Initial Public Offering and Conversion of Preferred Stock In November 1997, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission permitting the Company to sell shares of its common stock to the public. The offering was completed on November 12, 1997. In connection with the initial public offering, all outstanding shares of preferred stock were converted into shares of common stock. Warrants The Company has historically issued warrants in connection with its various rounds of financing, equipment lease lines, and transfers of technology. Warrants have been valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. In connection with the issuance of Series G preferred stock in July 1996, and the 1996 equipment lease line, the Company issued warrants to purchase 58,021 and 5,802 shares of common stock, respectively, at $10.34 per share. During 2000, a warrant to purchase 58,021 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 22,039 shares of common stock. The remaining warrants are exercisable at any time and expire in August 2006. In connection with the issuance of convertible promissory notes in June 1996, which were later converted into Series G preferred stock, the Company issued warrants to purchase 167,037 shares of common stock at $4.73 per share. In connection with the issuance of Series D preferred stock in May 1995, the Company issued warrants, at $.001 per warrant, to purchase 592,593 shares of common stock at $4.73 per share. In December 1997, a warrant to purchase 132,225 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 99,850 shares of common stock. During 2000, a warrant to purchase 53,213 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 39,682 shares of common stock. The remaining warrants expired in June 2001. During 1996, the Company issued warrants, at $.001 per warrant, to purchase 76,245 shares of common stock at $4.73 per share. In connection with technology transferred and the 1995 equipment lease line, the Company issued warrants to purchase 169,259 and 8,466 shares of common stock, respectively, at $4.73 per share. During 1996, a 33 warrant to purchase 169,259 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 91,921 shares of common stock. During 2000, a warrant to purchase 6,005 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 4,905 shares of common stock. Of the remaining warrants, 70,240 expired in June 2001 and 8,466 expire in August 2005. In September 1997, the Company issued warrants to purchase 252,381 shares of common stock in connection with the convertible subordinated notes payable, at an exercise price of $10.91. In October 1997, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,659 shares of common stock in connection with obtaining a bank credit facility at an exercise price of $10.91. In November 1997, warrants to purchase 151,267 shares of common stock were exercised for a net exercise of 76,096 shares of common stock. During 2000, a warrant to purchase 18,599 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 4,818 shares of common stock. These warrants are exercisable at any time and 82,515 expire in September 2002 and 2,659 expire in October 2002. In November 1997, the Company issued a five-year warrant to purchase 458,295 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.91 per share, in connection with a technology support and development arrangement. The warrants expire in November 2002. In June 1999, the Company issued a five-year warrant to purchase 210,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share to two customers in accordance with their volume purchase agreements. The fair value of the warrants of $407,000 was recorded as a discount on sales. During 2001, a warrant to purchase 90,000 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 90,000 shares of common stock. The remaining 120,000 warrants expire in June 2005. In September 1999, the Company issued to Sprint Corporation warrants to purchase $8.4 million of convertible debentures, as described in Note 6 of the Notes to Financial Statements. These debentures are convertible to 2,946,622 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.85 per share. The fair value of these warrants amounted to $20,800,000. Of this amount, $7,129,000 was recorded as a direct sales discount and the balance of $13,671,000 was recorded as an operating expense of the Sales and Marketing department. Substantially all of the warrants are subject to net exercise provisions. The Company has reserved shares for the exercise of all the warrants. In August 2001, the Company issued to Sprint Corporation warrants to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.20 per share in connection with a volume purchase agreement. The fair value of the warrants of $740,000 was recorded as a discount on sales. In February 2001, the Company issued to Halifax Fund, L.P., in connection with a financing described in Note 6 above, warrants to purchase 833,333 shares of common stock. A summary of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2001 follows: Number Exercise Expiration Outstanding Price Date ----------- ----- ---- 458,295 10.91 November 2002 82,515 10.91 September 2002 2,659 10.91 October 2002 2,946,622 2.85 September 2004 120,000 0.50 June 2005 8,466 4.73 August 2005 833,333 9.00 February 2006 5,802 10.34 August 2006 600,000 1.20 August 2006 --------- 5,057,692 ========= Stock Option Plans In January 1999, the Company adopted a 1999 Officer Stock Option Plan and reserved 1,000,000 shares for issuance to officers of the Company or of a parent or subsidiary of the Company. In May 1999, the Company adopted a 1999 Stock Option Plan and, as amended in August 1999 and October 1999, reserved 4,000,000 shares for issuance to 34 employees (including officers and directors who are also employees) or consultants of the Company or of a parent or subsidiary of the Company who meet the suitability standards set forth by this plan. The 1999 Officer Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Stock Option Plan will terminate ten years from the effective date or, if earlier, the date of stockholder approval of termination. In September 1997, the Company adopted the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan and reserved a total of 1,750,000 shares for issuance to employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, and advisors. The number of shares outstanding will increase automatically by 5% of the outstanding shares each year unless waived by the Board of Directors. In 1999, the Company increased the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan by 523,501 shares. The 1997 Equity Incentive Plan expires in September 2007. Also in September 1997, the Company adopted the 1997 Directors' Stock Option Plan under which 100,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance. The Directors' Plan provides for the grant of non-statutory stock options to non-employee directors of the Company and expires in September 2007. In December 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan and reserved 185,185 shares of common stock for issuance to employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors and advisors. In June 1997, the Company increased the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan by 222,222. The 1996 Equity Incentive Plan expires in December 2006. In December 1995, the Company adopted the Executive Officer Incentive Plan and reserved 370,370 shares of common stock for issuance to the Company's chief executive officer and other senior executive officers. In 1996 and 1997, the Company increased the number of shares reserved under this plan by 129,630 and 62,963, respectively. In the event of a merger, consolidation, liquidation or similar change of control transaction as a result of which the participants' responsibilities and position with the Company are materially diminished, options granted under this plan become fully exercisable and remain so for one year thereafter. This plan will expire in December 2005. In October 1993, the Company adopted the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan, and reserved 185,185 shares of common stock for issuance to employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. In 1995, 1996 and 1997, the Company increased the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan by 351,851, 425,925 and 66,340 shares, respectively. The 1993 Equity Incentive Plan expires in October 2003. Under all of the plans, the exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant (not less than 110% of fair market value if the option is granted to a 10% stockholder). Under all of the plans other than the 1999 Stock Option Plan, nonqualified stock options may not be granted at less than 85% of fair market value on the date of grant. Options and stock awards generally vest 12.5% six months from date of grant and 2.0833% per month thereafter; although certain options vest over a shorter period of time, and the vesting of certain options accelerates in certain circumstances. Stock options generally expire three months after termination of employment and five years from date of grant, subject to exceptions in certain cases. 35 Activity under the plans is set forth below (in thousands, except per share data):

Weighted ~~COMMISSION~~Value ~~FILE~~of ~~NUMBER:~~Average 0Shares Options Options Exercise Available Outstanding Outstanding Price -~~23289~~ -------- ----------- ----------- --------- Balances, January 1, 1999 1,089 2,735 $ 8,454 $ 3.09 Additional shares reserved 5,524 -- -- Options granted (4,075) 4,075 9,015 2.21 Options canceled 1,664 (1,664) (4,388) 2.64 Options exercised -- (251) (357) 1.42 ----- ----- -------- --------- Balances, December 31, 1999 4,202 4,895 12,724 2.60 ----- ----- -------- --------- Additional shares reserved -- -- -- Options granted (2,442) 2,442 30,319 12.42 Options canceled 1,086 (1,085) (6,365) 5.86 Options exercised -- (1,181) (11,842) 10.04 ----- ----- -------- --------- Balances, December 31, 2000 2,846 5,071 24,836 4.90 ----- ----- -------- --------- Additional shares reserved -- -- -- Options granted (1,786) 1,786 8,229 4.50 Options cancelled 2,132 (2,132) (25,476) 10.78 Options exercised -- (400) (274) 2.90 Stock awards (326) -- -- -- ----- ----- -------- --------- Balances, December 31, 2001 2,866 4,325 $ 7,315 $ 4.73 ===== ===== ======== =========

For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, the weighted average fair value of options granted was $4.50, $12.25, and $2.04, respectively. As of December 31, 2001, the stock options outstanding were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

~~HYBRID~~Weighted ~~NETWORKS, INC. (Exact~~Average ~~name~~Weighted Weighted Range of ~~registrant~~Remaining asAverage ~~specified~~Average inExercise ~~its~~Number ~~charter~~Contractual Exercise Number Exercise Prices Outstanding Life (Years) Price Exercisable Price --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------ ------------ ------------ $0.50 to $0.54 922 4.90 $ 0.51 758 $ 0.42 $1.08 to $2.19 466 2.67 1.91 257 2.10 $3.63 to $5.13 792 2.63 3.65 481 3.65 $5.31 to $8.78 1,661 4.01 5.61 538 5.95 $9.00 to $11.25 181 3.33 9.97 94 10.10 $12.19 to 19.75 303 3.34 16.77 198 17.74 ----- ---- ------ ----- ------ 4,325 3.66 $ 4.73 2,326 $ 4.42 ===== ==== ====== ===== ======

As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, options to purchase 1,653,000 and 1,658,000 shares were exercisable at an average weighted exercise price of $5.27 and $1.87 per share, respectively. 36 The Company has elected to continue to follow the provisions of APB 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," for financial reporting purposes and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123. Compensation cost has been recognized for the Company's stock option plans under APB 25 where options were granted to employees at an exercise price, which is below market value at the date of grant. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards in years ended 2000, 1999, and 1998 consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per share for 2000, 1999, and 1998 would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts): Years Ended December 31, ---------------------------------- 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Net loss as reported....................... $(10,517) $ (37,203) $ (22,192) Net loss-pro forma......................... $(14,391) $ (42,857) $ (23,061) Net loss per share-as reported............. $ (0.48) $ (2.03) $ (2.08) Net loss per share-pro forma............... $ (0.65) $ (2.34) $ (2.16) The above pro forma disclosures are not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net income or loss for future years. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123, the fair value of each option is estimated using the following weighted average assumptions for grants during 2001, 2000, and 1999: dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 0% for options issued prior to the Company's Initial Public Offering, 117% in 1999, 124.7% in 2000, and 139.6% in 2001, risk-free interest rates at the date of grant, and an expected term of four years. Employee Stock Purchase Plan In September 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under this plan, employees of the Company can purchase common stock through payroll deductions. A total of 225,000 shares have been reserved for issuance under this plan. As of December 31, 2001, no shares had been purchased and all employees have withdrawn from the plan. 10. INCOME TAXES Provision for income taxes for each of the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, was $0. For the Years Ended -------------------------------- 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Total benefit computed by applying the U.S. statutory rate -34.00% -34.00% -34.00% Permanent differences 4.77% 1.08% 11.40% Change in valuation allowance 29.23% 32.92% 22.60% ------ ------ ------ 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% ===== ===== ===== 37 Temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets are as follows (in thousands): December 31, ------------------------ 2001 2000 -------- -------- Current deferred assets: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 351 $ 80 Inventory reserves 753 789 UNICAP 310 666 Unearned revenue 43 1,552 Accrued liabilities 460 1,022 Book compensation for stock options 2,017 9,977 -------- -------- Total current deferred assets 3,934 14,086 Valuation allowance (3,934) (14,086) -------- -------- $ -- $ -- ======== ======== Long-term deferred assets: Net operating loss carryforwards $ 24,865 $ 21,006 Capitalized research expenditures 8,728 7,775 Tax credit carryforwards 4,302 2,884 Depreciation and amortization 951 843 -------- -------- Total long-term deferred assets 38,846 32,508 Valuation allowance $(38,846) (32,508) ======== -------- $ -- $ -- ======== ======== In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance must be established for a deferred tax asset if it is uncertain that a tax benefit may be realized from the asset in the future. Management believes that, based on a number of factors, the available objective evidence creates sufficient uncertainty regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets such that a full valuation allowance has been recorded. These factors include the Company's history of losses, the fact that the market in which the Company competes is intensely competitive and characterized by rapidly changing technology, the lack of carry back capacity to realize deferred tax assets, and the uncertainty regarding market acceptance of the Company's products. The Company will continue to assess the realizability of the deferred tax assets in future periods. The valuation allowance decreased by $3,814,000 in 2001_and increased by $15,281,000 in 2000. The Company had federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $66,664,000 and $24,873,000, respectively, as of December 31, 2001 available to offset future regular and alternative minimum taxable income. The Company's net operating loss carry forwards expire in 2005 through 2021 if not utilized. In addition, at December 31, 2001, the Company had the following available credits to offset future tax liabilities (in thousands): Tax Expiration Reporting Dates --------- ----- Federal research and development credit $ 2,518 2007-2021 State research and development credit $ 1,645 No expiration State manufacturing investment credit $ 140 2004-2011 The Company's net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards may be subject to limitation in the event of ownership changes, as defined by tax laws. 38 11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN The Company adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the "Plan"), which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Plan covers essentially all employees. Eligible employees may make voluntary contributions to the Plan up to 15% of their annual compensation and the employer is allowed to make discretionary contributions. In 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company made no employer contributions. 12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS See Notes 6, 10, and 14 for transactions with Sprint. 13. BUSINESS SEGMENT AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS The Company operates in a single industry segment and primarily sells its products to customers in the U.S. and Canada. Sales by product category during 2001 consist of 99% to wireless customers and 1% to cable customers. In 2000, 94% of sales were to wireless customers and 6% were to cable customers. In 1999, 48% of sales were to wireless customers and 52% to cable customers. Sales to international customers represented less than 1%, 24%, and 5%, of net sales in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. International sales in any one geographic area other than Canada were insignificant. Individual customers that comprise 10% or more of the Company's gross sales are as follows: 2001 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- Sprint Corporation 88% 54% 28% RCN Corporation -- -- 31% Look Communications, Inc. -- 23% -- At December 31, 2001 and 2000, these customers accounted for $5,000 and $7,530,000, respectively, and 1%, and 98%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. 39 SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA: HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)

DELAWARE (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)		77-0252931 (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
6409 Guadalupe Mines Road San Jose, California (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)		95120 (ZIP CODE)

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None 40 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY. The following table sets forth certain information regarding our officers and directors as of March 14, 2002.

~~REGISTRANT'S~~Directors ~~TELEPHONE~~and ~~NUMBER~~Age Position Director Since Executive Officers James R. Flach.................. 55 Chairman of the Board 1995 Michael D. Greenbaum (3)........ 59 President, ~~INCLUDING~~Chief ~~AREA~~Executive ~~CODE:~~Officer, 2000 Chief Financial Officer and Director Anand M. Khokha (~~408~~2) ~~323-6500~~ ............ 58 Director 2001 Phillip J. Kushner (2).......... 59 Director 2000 Gary M. Lauder (1)(2)........... 39 Director 1994 Cameron M. Rejali............... 40 Director 2001 Thomas E. Bisset (3)............ 37 Vice President, Research and Development

(1) Member of the compensation committee (2) Member of the audit committee (3) Executive officer James R. Flach has been a director of Hybrid since May 1995 and served as Hybrid's acting Chief Executive Officer from November 1995 to January 1996 and from October 1999 to January 2000. In January 2000, Mr. Flach was appointed Chairman of Hybrid's board of directors. Since September 1992, Mr. Flach has been an executive partner of Accel Partners, a venture capital firm. Since September 1992, he has also been the President of Flach & Associates, a management services firm, and formerly, served as Chief Executive Officer of Redback Networks, a network products company. From May 1990 to August 1992, Mr. Flach was Vice President of Intel, serving as the General Manager of Intel's Personal Computer Enhancement Division. He holds a B.S. in Physics from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and an M.S. in Applied Mathematics from The Rochester Institute of Technology. Michael D. Greenbaum has been a Director and Chief Executive Officer of Hybrid since January 2000 and Chief Financial Officer since February 2002. Prior to joining the Company, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Continuity Solutions from April 1999 through December 1999. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Marketing and Sales for Netcom Online Communications, Inc. from October 1998 to March 1999. He also was Senior Vice President and General Manager for Applied Theory Communications, Inc. from 1997 to 1998, and Vice President and General Manager for Borland International from 1996 to 1997. Mr. Greenbaum holds a B.A. in History from Case Western Reserve University. Anand M. Khokha has been a director since June 2001. Mr. Khokha is President of Durkee/Sharlit Associates, a management consulting firm. Prior to his service with Durkee/Sharlit, Mr. Khokha was associated with Theodore Barry Associates, a national management consulting firm. Earlier affiliations include management positions with Allis Chalmers Co., the Wayerhauser Co., and the UCLA School of Management teaching staff. Mr. Khokha holds a M.B.A. from U.C.L.A., and M.S.I.E. from Purdue University, and a B.S.M.E. from Roorkee University, India. Phillip J. Kushner has been a director of the Company since October 2000. Mr. Kushner is a shareholder of the law firm of Greenberg Traurig P.A., and has been associated with Greenberg Truarig P.A. since November 1998. Prior to that, he practiced corporate and securities law in Dallas for more than twenty years. Mr. Kushner holds a J.D. cum laude from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, an M.B.A. in Finance, with distinction from Harvard Business School and an A.B. in Economics and History from Brandeis University. 41 Gary M. Lauder has been a director of Hybrid since October 1994. Since 1986, he has been the General Partner of Lauder Partners, a venture capital partnership formed by Mr. Lauder that focuses on advanced technologies for the cable TV marketplace. Since May 1995, Mr. Lauder has been Vice-Chairman of ICTV, Inc., a developer of interactive cable television technology. Mr. Lauder holds a B.A. in International Relations from the University of Pennsylvania, a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. Cameron M. Rejali has been a director of the Company since February 2001. Mr. Rejali is Vice President, Fixed Wireless Operations, Sprint Corporation. Prior to his current position, Mr. Rejali held a number of positions within Sprint. He was Vice President of International Product and Alliance Management within Long Distance International, responsible for product management, product development and alliance strategy. Before that, Mr. Rejali was Assistant Vice President of International responsible for directing Sprint's international strategic planning efforts, and Director of Corporate Strategy, responsible for strategy development at a corporate level. Before joining Sprint, Mr. Rejali was a consultant with the management consulting firm at A.T. Kearney. Mr. Rejali holds a B.A. in Economics from Harvard University and an M.A. in Economics from the University of Chicago. Thomas E. Bissett, Hybrid's Vice President of Manufacturing and Support, joined the company in 1996 and has held the positions of vice president of operations and director of operations. Before this, Bissett was vice president of operations and a member of the founding team of Semaphore Communications Corp., a Xerox company that designed and manufactured network security products. He holds a master's degree in business administration from San Jose State University and master's and bachelor's degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Utah. Bissett is a licensed professional engineer in Texas and California. Board of Directors Committees Standing committees of Hybrid's board of directors include an audit committee and a compensation committee. Mr. Lauder, Mr. Kushner, and Mr. Khokha are the current members of the audit committee. Mr. Flach was on the audit committee until February 11, 2001 at which time he resigned from the audit committee. The audit committee met separately nine times during 2001. Mr. Lauder is the only current member of the compensation committee. A. Alan Kurtze was the other member of the compensation committee until his resignation from Hybrid's Board in January 2002. The compensation committee met three times during 2001, although the committee conferred informally on matters within the committee's purview during the year and addressed such matters from time to time during meetings of the board of directors. The compensation committee makes recommendations to the board of directors concerning salaries and incentive compensation for Hybrid's officers and employees. The full board of directors administers Hybrid's employee benefit plans. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid for services rendered to Hybrid in all capacities during 2001 by (i) Hybrid's Chief Executive Officer; (ii) Hybrid's other executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer) who were serving as executive officers at December 31, 2001 and had salary and bonus for 2001 of $100,000 or more (two persons) and (iii) two individuals who were among the four most highly compensated executive officers of Hybrid during 2001 (other than the Chief Executive Officer) but who were not serving as executive officers on December 31, 2001(collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"). 42 Summary Compensation Table

~~Securities registered~~LONG-TERM ~~pursuant~~COMPENSATION to------------ ~~Section 12~~ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS ------------------- ------ SHARES OF COMMON OTHER ANNUAL STOCK UNDERLYING ALL OTHER NAME AND PRINCIPLE POSITIONS YEAR SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION OPTIONS (b#) COMPENSATION ---------------------------- ---- ------ ----- ------------ ----------- ------------ Michael D. Greenbaum 2001 297,909 126,073 405,300 President, Chief Executive Officer 2000 248,735 105,027 15,383(1) 666,667 15,383(1) Thomas E. Bissett 2001 165,000 67,211 -- 77,300 Vice President, Research & 2000 145,925 45,738 -- 3,333 Development 1999 130,497 7,250 -- 155,825 Judson W. Goldsmith (2) 2001 225,000 42,328 125,600 Vice President, Finance 2000 220,833 144,362 -- Chief Financial Officer 1999 175,841 17,500 375,000 Deborah Burton (4) 2001 218,227 51,100 169,600 Vice President, Sales & 2000 170,665 43,997 2,540(7) 400,000 2,540(6) Marketing Nathan Wang (3) 2001 111,054 38,625 104,400 Vice President, Research & 2000 193,648 53,552 25,443(6) 400,000 25,443(5) Development (1) Includes temporary living expenses paid by Hybrid of $15,383 to Mr. Greenbaum. (2) Mr. Goldsmith left the ~~Exchange~~Company ~~Act:~~in ~~None~~January 2002. (3) Mr. Wang left the company in July 2001. (4) Ms. Burton left the company in November 2001. (5) Includes moving expenses of $25,443 paid to Mr. Wang. (6) Includes moving expenses of $2,540 paid to Ms. Burton.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation No member of the compensation committee of the board of directors during 2001 was an officer or employee of Hybrid. No executive officer of Hybrid serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on Hybrid's board of directors or compensation committee. James R. Flach was not a member of the compensation committee or the audit committee while he was an officer of the Company during the period October 1999 to January 2000. Director Compensation In December 2000, the board of directors adopted a Director Compensation Program. All directors are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses in attending board and board committee meetings and receive fees for attending board and board committee meetings, as follows: o Fee per board meeting attended in person $2,000 o Fee per board meeting attended by telephone $1,000 o Fee per committee meeting attended in person $1,000 o Fee per committee meeting attended by phone $500 43 Each non-employee director who is not serving on the board of directors pursuant to contractual rights to nominate a member of the board of directors will be granted an option to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock upon becoming a member of the board of directors. Also, each eligible director who became a member of the board of directors prior to the adoption of the Director Compensation Policy received an option to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock. Upon each annual meeting, each eligible director will be granted an additional option to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock. All options to be granted to each eligible director will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The options have five-year terms, and will terminate three months following the date the director ceases to be a director or a consultant or 12 months if the termination is due to death or disability. All options granted to an eligible director will become initially exercisable six months after grant as to 12.5% of the aggregate number of shares granted and as to 2.0833% of the aggregate number of shares granted on each succeeding month thereafter so long as he or she continues as a member of the board of directors or as a consultant. In the event of our dissolution or liquidation or a "change in control" transaction, options granted under the plan will be 100% vested and exercisable in full. Furthermore, each eligible director shall receive an annual retainer fee of $20,000, payable in stock pursuant to the Company's 1997 Equity Incentive Plan at the rate of $5,000 per quarter on each April 1, July 1, October 1, and January 1 if such director served as a director on the last day of, and for more than one half of, the calendar quarter preceding each such date, with the shares to have a value, for the purpose of computing the number of shares to issue, equal to the closing price of the common stock on the last business day of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the payment date. Pursuant to the terms of the Director Compensation Policy discussed above, in June 2001, we granted options to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Khokha at an exercise price of $0.58 per share. In May 2001, we granted to Messrs. Flach, Kushner, and Lauder, options to purchase 20,000 shares each of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.02 per share. As payment of their retainer fee described above, in January 2001, we granted to Messrs. Flach, Kushner and Lauder, 640 shares each of common stock; in April 2001 we granted to Messrs. Flach, Kushner and Lauder, 2,000 shares each of common stock; in July 2001 we granted to Messrs. Flach, Kushner and Lauder, 8,771 shares each of common stock; in October 2001 we granted to Messrs. Flach, Kushner, Lauder and Khokha 4,000 shares each of common stock; in January 2002 we granted to Messrs. Flach, Kushner, Lauder and Khokha 9,804 shares each of common stock. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2001, with respect to beneficial ownership of Hybrid's common stock by (i) each stockholder Hybrid believes to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its common stock, (ii) each of Hybrid's current directors, (iii) each of the Named Executive Officers (as that term is defined in Part III, Item 11, above) and (iv) all of Hybrid's current executive officers and directors as a group:

~~Securities registered~~NUMBER ~~pursuant~~OF toSHARES ~~Section 12~~PERCENTAGE OF SHARES NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED (g1) ofBENEFICIALLY ~~the~~OWNED ~~Exchange~~------------------------ ~~Act:~~---------------------- ~~common~~------------------ ~~stock~~Sprint Corporation (2)............... 7,613,068 ~~par~~19.4% ~~value~~Cameron $M. Rejali Halifax Fund L.P. (3)................ 6,881,333 17.6% Accel Partners (4) James R. Flach (4)................. 2,631,419 6.7% Gary M. Lauder (5)................... 533,109 1.4% Michael D. Greenbaum (6)............. 179,704 0.~~001~~5% ~~per~~Tom ~~share~~Bisset (7) 158,434 0.4% Phillip J. Kushner (8) .............. 40,632 0.1% Anand M. Khokha (9) 20,471 0.1% Judson W. Goldsmith (10) 477,812 1.2% Frederick Enns (11) 202,374 0.5% All current executive officers and directors as a group (9 persons)(12).................... 4,277,645 10.9%

44 (1) Unless otherwise indicated below, Hybrid believes that the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. Unless otherwise indicated below, the address of the named beneficial owner is that of Hybrid. Shares of Hybrid's common stock subject to options, warrants or convertible debentures that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001, are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options and/or warrants for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of such person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. (2) Represents (i) 4,066,446 shares of Hybrid's common stock issued in June 2000 upon conversion of 4% Convertible Class A Debentures (see Note #6 to the financial statements "Issuance of Securities to Sprint Corporation and to Other Investors"), (ii) 2,946,622 shares of Hybrid's common stock issuable upon conversion of 4% Convertible Class A Debentures which are themselves issuable upon exercise of warrants and (iii) warrants to purchase 600,000 shares in connection with the purchase of Hybrid products. Sprint's address is 2330 Shawnee Mission Parkway, Westwood, KA 66205. Cameron M. Rejali is the vice president of Broadband Wireless Products and Operations for Sprint's National Consumer organization. (3) Represents 6,881,333 shares of Hybrid's common stock issuable upon conversion of 7,560 shares of the company's Series K Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements). Halifax's address is 195 Maplewood, NJ 07040. (4) Represents ownership by entities associated with Accel Partners as follows: 759,345 outstanding shares and 8,399 shares subject to warrants or convertible debentures, held by Accel IV, L.P.; 35,575 outstanding shares and 394 shares subject to warrants or convertible debentures, held by Accel Investors '95 L.P.; 17,975 outstanding shares and 202 outstanding shares subject to warrants or convertible debentures, held by Ellmore C. Patterson Partners; 15,750 outstanding shares and 174 shares subject to warrants or convertible debentures, held by Accel Keiretsu L.P.; 155,001, 309,877, and 1,239,506 outstanding shares held by Accel Investors 99 L.P., Accel Internet Fund III and Accel VII L.P., respectively. 43,804 outstanding shares were held in Mr. Flach's personal account. Mr. Flach is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Hybrid and an executive partner of Accel Partners. He holds no voting or dispositive power with respect to any of the above shares. The table also includes 45,417 shares that are subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001 held by Mr. Flach, granted in connection with services performed by Mr. Flach for Hybrid. The address of Mr. Flach and the Accel partnerships is 428 University Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94301. (5) Represents (i) 514,025 outstanding shares and (ii) 19,084 shares subject to warrants or options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001. Mr. Lauder is a director of Hybrid. His address is 88 Mercedes Lane, Atherton, CA 94027. (6) Represents 78,379 outstanding shares and 101,325 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001. Mr. Greenbaum became the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Hybrid in January 2000. (7) Represents 36,648 outstanding shares and 121,786 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001. Mr. Bissett has been Vice President, Research and Development since July 2001. (8) Represents 25,215 outstanding shares and 15,417 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001. Mr. Kushner has been a director of the company since October 2000. (9) Represents 13,804 outstanding shares and 6,667 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001. Mr. Khokha has been a director of the company since May 2001. (10) Represents 20,225 outstanding shares and 457,587 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001. Mr. Goldsmith was Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer. He left the Company in January 2002. (11) Represents 5,034 outstanding shares and 197,340 shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001. Mr. Enns was Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of Hybrid. He left the company in February 2002. (12) Represents (i) 3,283,540 outstanding shares and (ii) 12,836 shares subject to warrants or convertible debentures and (iii) 981,269 options exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2001. 45 The following table sets forth further information regarding option grants during 2001, pursuant to our 1997 Equity Incentive Play, to each of the named Executive officers. The table sets forth the hypothetical gains or "option spreads" that would exist for the options at the end of their repective five or ten year terms. These gains are based on assumed rates of annual compound stock price appreciation of 5% and 10% from the date the option was granted to the end of the option term.

~~Indicate by~~OPTION ~~check~~GRANTS ~~mark~~IN ~~whether~~2001 ~~the~~NUMBER ~~Registrant:~~OF ~~(1) has~~PERCENTAGE ~~filed~~OF ~~all~~Potential ~~reports~~Realizable ~~required~~Value toat beSHARES ~~filed~~OF byTOTAL ~~Section 13~~Assumed orAnnual 15Rates of Stock COMMON STOCK OPTIONS Price Appreciation for Option UNDERLYING GRANTED TO Term(d2) ofOPTIONS ~~the~~EMPLOYEES ~~Exchange~~IN ~~Act~~EXERCISE ~~during~~PRICE ~~the~~--------------------------------- ~~past~~NAME ~~12 months~~ GRANTED (or1) ~~for~~2001 ~~such~~PER ~~shorter~~SHARE ~~period~~EXPIRATION ~~that~~DATE ~~the~~5% ~~Registrant~~10% ~~was~~---- ~~required~~------------ to------------- ~~file~~-------------- ~~such~~--------------- ~~reports)~~--------------- --------------- Michael D. Greenbaum 405,300 ~~and~~22.69% (4.9375 2~~) has~~/20/2006 ~~been~~$2,554,055 ~~subject~~$3,222,902 toJudson ~~such~~W. ~~filing~~Goldsmith ~~requirements~~125,600 ~~for~~7.03% ~~the~~4.9375 ~~past~~2/20/2006 ~~90 days~~$ 791,486 $ 998,758 Deborah Burton 169,600 9. ~~Yes~~ 49% 4.9375 2/x20/ No 2006 $1,068,758 $1,348,641 Nathan Wang 104,400 5.84% 4.9375 2/ 20/2006 $ 657,891 $ 830,178 Thomas E. Bissett 77,300 4.33% 4.9375 2/20/2006 $ 487,117 $ 614,681

----------------------- (1) Options granted in 2001 have been ISOs or NQSOs that were granted at fair market value and vest over a four-year period so long as the individual is employed by Hybrid, subject to acceleration in certain instances. The options generally expire five years from the date of grant or within 90 days after termination of employment. (2) The 5% and 10% assumed annual rates of stock price appreciation are mandated by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not represent Hybrid's estimate or projection of future common stock prices. The following table sets forth the number of shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options during 2001 and the number of shares covered by both exercisable and unexercisable stock options held by each of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2001. Also reported are values of "in-the-money"options, which represent the positive spread between the respective exercise prices of outstanding stock options and the fair market value of Hybrid's common stock as of December 31, 2001 as reported on the Nasdaq ($0.51): AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 2001 AND YEAR-END VALUES

~~Indicate by~~NUMBER ~~check~~OF ~~mark~~SHARES ifOF ~~disclosure~~COMMON ofSTOCK ~~delinquent~~VALUE ~~filers~~OF ~~pursuant~~UNEXERCISED toUNDERLYING ~~Item~~UNEXERCISED ~~405~~IN-THE-MONEY ofOPTIONS ~~Regulation S~~AT YEAR-KEND isOPTIONS ~~not~~AT ~~contained~~YEAR-END ~~herein~~SHARES ACQUIRED --------------------------- --------------------------- NAME ON EXERCISE(#) VALUE REALIZED EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE ---- --------------- -------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Michael D. Greenbaum -- $ -- 84,437 ~~and~~320,863 ~~will~~$ ~~not~~-- be$ ~~contained~~-- Judson W. Goldsmith 11,000 to$ ~~the~~12,300 ~~best~~425,271 ~~of Registrant's~~284,329 ~~knowledge~~$ 1,838 in$ ~~definitive~~802 ~~proxy~~Deborah orBurton ~~information~~-- ~~statements~~$ ~~incorporated~~-- by167,077 ~~reference~~-- in$ ~~Part III~~-- of$ ~~this~~-- ~~Form 10~~Nathan Wang -K- or$ ~~any~~-- ~~amendment~~-- to-- ~~this Form 10~~$ -~~K / /~~- $ -- Thomas E. Bissett -- $ -- 116,075 94,548 $ 558 $ --

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS Effective July 3, 2001, Sprint committed to purchase an additional $9.6 million of our products under terms that were different from those agreed to in the master purchase agreement dated May 1, 2000. In connection with this commitment, we issued to Sprint warrants to purchase up to 600,000 shares of our common stock at $1.20 per share. All of the shipments relating to these purchase warrants were made during the quarter ending September 30, 2001. These purchases were not subject to acceptance criteria. In accordance with SFAS 123 and utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model, we determined that the estimated value of these purchase warrants was $740,000 and this amount was applied as a sales discount during the quarter ending September 30, 2001. Except for (i) the compensation arrangements described in the section entitled "Executive Compensation" and (ii) the transactions described below, from January 1, 2001 to the present, there has been no (and there is not currently proposed), transaction or series of similar transactions to which Hybrid was (or is to be) a party in which the amount involved exceeds $60,000 and in which any director, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of Hybrid's common stock (or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons) had (or will have) a direct or indirect interest. 46 Retention Agreements In January 2000, Hybrid's board of directors entered into an agreement with Michael D. Greenbaum, the Company's Chief Executive Officer whereby Mr. Greenbaum would receive a base salary, be eligible for a bonus, would be entitled to severance pay and would receive options to purchase up to 500,000 shares of Hybrid's common stock with normal vesting (except that, subject to further discussion with the Company's legal counsel, there would be 18 months' acceleration on termination of employment by the Company). In August 2001, Hybrid's board of directors entered into a Change of Control Bonus Agreement with Mr. Greenbaum whereby in the event of a change of control, as defined, Mr. Greenbaum would be entitled to a bonus in the amount of $500,000. In October 2001, the board approved an option exchange for Mr. Greenbaum, whereby options held by Mr. Greenbaum were cancelled in exchange for a new stock option to be granted in April 2002. Separation Agreements In November 2001, Hybrid entered into a separation agreement with Deborah Burton, Hybrid's Vice President, Sales and Marketing, which provided for a severance payment equivalent to approximately four months salary plus two prior quarters of executive bonuses. In January 2002, Hybrid entered into a separation agreement with Judson W. Goldsmith, Hybrid's Chief Financial Officer, which provided for continued payment of his full salary during a transition period after the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer, and to be followed by a period of part time employment until a final termination date in July 2002. Mr. Goldsmith continued to be eligible for a $125,000 change of control bonus as provided for in his original offer letter of November 1998, but only if such change of control occurred prior to the July 2002 termination date. In February 2002, Hybrid entered into a separation agreement with Frederick Enns, Hybrid's Chief Technical Officer, which provided for a severance payment of three months salary. Mr. Enns relinquished the change of control bonus provisions contained in an earlier retention bonus agreement. In February 2002, Hybrid entered into a separation agreement with Scott D. McDonald, who had been Hybrid's Chief Financial Officer from January 2002. Under the agreement, Mr. McDonald was allowed to retain a $50,000 signing bonus. Arrangements Regarding Board of Directors Mr. Rejali was appointed as director of Hybrid in February 2001 to fill the vacancy created upon the resignation of Timothy Sutton. If Mr. Rejali resigns or is terminated as a director, Hybrid has agreed to use its best efforts to cause Sprint's nominees to take their place as a member of the board of directors. Sprint has the right to appoint one additional director following the resignation of its nominee, Mr. Kurtze, in January 2002. Sprint has not exercised its right to nominate a director for this position. Sprint holds a debenture that is convertible at any time, at Sprint's election, into shares of a newly created series of Hybrid preferred stock pursuant to which Sprint, as the holder of such stock, will have the right to elect two of Hybrid's five directors as well as certain other voting rights. Sprint has not yet exercised that debenture, and no preferred stock is outstanding. Under Hybrid's agreement with Sprint, Hybrid has also granted to Sprint, certain veto rights and other rights and privileges. For a more detailed description of the securities issued by Hybrid to Sprint and the rights and privileges granted to Sprint, please see Note 6 to the financial statements on page 30 "Insurance of Securities to Sprint Corporation and to other Investors." 47 PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Documents filed as part of the Report: Page No. -------- 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. See the Index to Financial Statements at Item 8 of this Report.............. 18 2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. Schedules not listed below have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required or the information required to be set forth in those schedules is included in the financial statements or related notes. Schedule II-Valuation and qualifying accounts...... 52 3. EXHIBITS. The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report on Form 10-K:

As Incorporated by Reference ------------------------- Date of ~~January 31,~~Exhibit ~~2001,~~Exhibit ~~there~~First ~~were~~Exhibit ~~outstanding~~Filed ~~22,000,018~~Number ~~shares~~Description ofForm ~~the~~File No. Filing Number Herewith ------ ----------- ---- -------- ------ ------ -------- 3.01 Registrant's ~~common~~Amended ~~stock,~~and ~~$0.001~~Restated ~~par~~Certificate ~~value~~of ~~per~~S-1 ~~share~~333-36001 11/11/97 3.03 AsIncorporation. 3.02 Certificate of ~~that~~Designations ~~date,~~of ~~the~~Series ~~aggregate~~J ~~market~~Non-Convertible ~~value~~8-K 000-23289 09/24/99 3.1 Preferred Stock of the ~~shares~~Registrant. 3.03 Certificate of ~~voting~~Designations ~~common~~of ~~stock~~Series ~~held~~K byCumulative ~~non~~10-~~affiliates~~Q 000-23289 08/14/01 3.01 Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant. 3.04 Registrant's Amended and Restated Bylaws, ~~based~~as adopted on ~~the~~10-K ~~average~~000-23289 ~~bid~~03/30/01 ~~and~~3.03 ~~ask~~March ~~prices~~22, 2001. 4.01 Form of ~~such~~Specimen ~~stock~~Stock asCertificate representing shares of ~~such~~S-1 ~~date~~333-36001 as11/11/97 ~~reported~~4.01 byRegistrant's ~~The~~Common ~~Nasdaq~~Stock. ~~National~~4.02 ~~Market was~~Securities ~~approximately~~Purchase ~~$100~~Agreement between Halifax Fund,~~352,~~ L.P. 8-K 000-23289 02/22/01 4.01 ~~This~~and ~~excludes~~the ~~shares~~Registrant, dated as of ~~common~~February ~~stock~~16, ~~held~~2001. by4.03 ~~directors~~Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, ~~officers~~dated ~~and~~as ~~stockholders~~of ~~whose~~8-K ~~ownership~~000-23289 ~~exceeded~~02/22/01 ~~ten~~4.03 ~~percent~~February of16, 2001. 4.04 Exchange Agreement between Halifax Fund, L.P. and the ~~shares~~10-Q ~~outstanding~~000-23289 08/14/01 4.01 ~~Exclusion~~Registrant, dated as of ~~shares held~~August by13, ~~any~~2001. ~~person~~4.05 ~~should~~Registration ~~not~~Rights ~~be construed~~Agreement tobetween ~~indicate~~Halifax ~~that~~Fund, ~~such~~L.P. ~~person~~10-Q ~~possesses~~000-23289 ~~power~~08/14/01 4.02 and the Registrant, ~~direct~~dated oras ~~indirect~~of August 13, to2001. ~~direct~~10.01 orAmended ~~cause~~and ~~the~~Restated ~~direction~~Investors ofRights ~~the~~Agreement ~~management~~dated oras ~~policies~~S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.01 of ~~the~~September 18, 1997, between Registrant and certain investors, oras ~~that~~amended, ~~such~~October ~~person~~13, is1997, ~~controlled~~and byas oramended ~~is under~~November ~~common~~6, ~~control~~1997. ~~with~~10.02 ~~the~~Registrant's 1993 Equity Incentive Plan. (2) S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.02 10.03 Registrant's 1996 Equity Incentive Plan. (2) S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.03

Incorporated by ~~TABLE~~Reference OF------------------------- ~~CONTENTS~~ Date of Exhibit Exhibit First Exhibit Filed Number Description Form File No. Filing Number Herewith ------ ----------- ---- -------- ------ ------ -------- 10.04 Registrant's Executive Officer Incentive Plan. (2) S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.04 10.05 Registrant's 1997 Equity Incentive Plan. (2) S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.05 10.06 Registrant's 1997 Directors Stock Option Plan. (2) S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.06 10.07 Registrant's 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (2) S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.07 10.08 Registrant's 1999 Stock Option Plan. (2) 10-K 000-23289 03/24/00 10.08 10.09 Registrant's 1999 Officer Stock Option Plan. (2) 10-K 000-23289 03/24/00 10.09 10.10 Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into by Registrant S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.08 with each of its directors and executive officers. (2) 10.11 Employment Letter from the Registrant to Michael D. 10-Q 000-23289 05/11/00 10.1 Greenbaum, Dated January 12, 2000. (2) 10.12 Senior Secured Convertible $5.5 Million Debenture S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.12 Purchase Agreement between Registrant and London Pacific Life & Annuity Company, Dated April 30, 1997, and related Senior Secured Convertible $5.5 Million Debenture Due 2002 and Security Agreement. 10.15 Collaboration Agreement among Registrant, Sharp S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.15 Corporation and Itochu Corporation, dated November 25, 1996 and Addendum No. 1 thereto, dated November 25, 1996. 10.16 Sales and Purchase Agreement between Registrant and S-1 333-36001 11/11/97 10.16 Itochu Corporation, Dated January 10, 1997. (1) 10.17 Stipulation of settlement dated March 3, 1999, between 10-K 000-23289 03/24/00 10.17 the Registrant and lead counsel for the plaintiffs in class action litigation against the Registrant. 10.24 Sublease between the Registrant and Viking Freight, Inc., S-4 333-52083 05/07/98 10.24 dat5ed February 9, 1998. 10.26 Employment Letter from the Registrant to Judson W. 10-K 000-23289 06/14/99 10.26 Goldsmith dated November 12, 1998. (2) 10.27 Product Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and RCN 10-K 000-23289 06/14/99 10.27 Operating Services, Inc., dated June 30, 1997. 10.28 Securities Purchase Agreement between Sprint Corporation 8-K 000-23289 09/24/99 10.1 and the Registrant, dated August 30, 1999. 10.29 Warrant Agreement between Sprint Corporation and the 8-K 000-23289 09/24/99 10.2 Registrant, dated as of September 9, 1999.

			Page
PART I
	ITEM 1	Business	3
	ITEM 2	Properties	10
	ITEM 3	Legal Proceedings	10
	ITEM 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	12
PART II
	ITEM 5	Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters	13
	ITEM 6	Selected Financial Data	14
	ITEM 7	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
	ITEM 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
	ITEM 8	Financial Statements	30
	ITEM 9	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	54
PART III
	ITEM 10	Directors and Executive Officers of the Company	55
	ITEM 11	Executive Compensation	55
	ITEM 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	55
	ITEM 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	55
PART IV
	ITEM 14	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K	56
Signatures			59

(1) Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of this agreement. Such portions were omitted from the respective filing and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (2) Represents a management agreement or compensatory plan. (b) Reports on Form 8-K We have filed the following current reports on Form 8-K since September 30, 2001: 1. On November 6, 2001, we filed a current report on Form 8-K to report that our fixed broadband wireless system has been commercially launched in Montgomery, Alabama by WorldCom. 2. On November 7, 2001, we filed a current report on Form 8-K to report that our fixed broadband wireless system has been commercially launched in Tallahassee, Florida by WorldCom. 3. On November 8, 2001, we filed a current report on Form 8-K to report that Michael D. Greenbaum, the Company's president and CEO, assumed the responsibilities of Deborah L. Burton, the former vice president of sales and marketing of the Company. 4. On December 3, 2001, we filed a current report on Form 8-K to report that the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel determined that the Company has evidenced compliance with the Nasdaq Small Cap Market continued listing requirements and that the Company's securities would continue to be listed on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. 50 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. March 21, 2002 HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. By: /s/ Michael D. Greenbaum ------------------------ Michael D. Greenbaum Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

~~As used~~Name inTitle ~~this~~Date ~~report~~PRINCIPAL onEXECUTIVE ~~Form 10~~AND FINANCIAL OFFICER /s/ Michael D. Greenbaum Chief Executive Officer, Director March 21, 2002 -K------------------------------- Michael D. Greenbaum PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER /s/ Burke A. Ferrari Controller March 21, ~~unless~~2002 ~~the~~-------------------------------- ~~context~~Burke ~~otherwise~~A. ~~requires~~Ferrari ADDITIONAL DIRECTORS /s/ James R. Flach Chairman, ~~the~~Board ~~terms~~of ~~"we~~Directors March 21," ~~"us~~2002 -------------------------------- James R. Flach /s/ Anand Khokha Director March 21," or2002 -------------------------------- Anand Khokha /s/ Phillip J. Kushner Director March 21, ~~"the~~2002 ~~Company"~~-------------------------------- ~~and~~Phillip ~~"Hybrid"~~J. ~~refer~~Kushner to/s/ ~~Hybrid Networks~~Gary M. Lauder Director March 21, ~~Inc~~ 2002 -------------------------------- Gary M. Lauder /s/ Cameron M. Rejali Director March 21, a2002 ~~Delaware~~-------------------------------- ~~corporation~~Cameron M. Rejali

51 HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (IN THOUSANDS)

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS Additions Additions Balance at Charged Charged Balance Beginning to Costs and to Other at End For the year ended: of Period Expenses Accounts Deductions of Period ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- December 31, 2001 $ 200 $ 681 -- -- $ 881 December 31, 2000 200 -- -- -- 200 December 31, 1999 200 -- -- -- 200 INVENTORY RESERVES Additions Additions Balance at Charged Charged Balance Beginning to Costs and to Other at End For the year ended: of Period Expenses Accounts Deductions of Period ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- December 31, 2001 $ 1,980 $ 866 $ -- $ (957) $ 1,889 December 31, 2000 2,842 235 -- (1,097) 1,980 December 31, 1999 3,135 529 -- (822) 2,842

PART I

This report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or financial results, including such statements indicating that "we believe," "we expect," "we anticipate", or "we intend" that certain events may occur or certain trends may continue. Other forward-looking statements include statements about the future development of products or technologies, matters relating to our proprietary rights, facilities needs, our liquidity and capital needs, and other statements about future matters. All these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. You should not rely too heavily on these statements; although they reflect the good faith judgment of our management, they involve future events that might not occur. We can only base such statements on facts and factors that we currently know. Our actual results could differ materially from those in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements as a result of subsequent events.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

We design, develop, manufacture and market broadband access products, primarily for wireless systems, that provide high-speed access to the Internet for business and consumers. Our customers are principally wireless system operators and national and regional telephone companies. Our systems are designed for operators of wireless frequencies within the Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (MMDS), Multipoint Distribution Service (MDS), Wireless Communication Service (WCS), Instructional Television Fixed Service (ITFS), 3.5 GHz, and other similar bands. We do not compete in markets with unlicensed or Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS), frequencies. Our high-speed access systems remove the bottleneck in the connection to the end-user, thereby greatly accelerating the response time for accessing bandwidth-intensive information on the Internet. We provide a proven alternative to Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) and cable for high-speed Internet access for small businesses and residential subscribers.

In 2000, major Hybrid systems were deployed in 18 markets worldwide including 11 markets for Sprint Corp. Hybrid systems are now deployed in more than 70 markets across six continents. We believe the demand for high-speed Internet access will continue to grow internationally as well as domestically. The advantages that Hybrid has in this marketplace include:

We believe that the FBBW market is poised for significant growth. The ARC Group expects global revenues of the FBBW industry to reach $41 billion by 2005. Allied Business Intelligence predicts that

MMDS will account for more than six million subscribers worldwide by year-end 2005, with the U.S. accounting for more than 20% of the market.

Technology, Products, and Services

Our products are an integral part of a system operator's full wireless high-speed Internet access system. Our Series 2000 product-line includes head end routers, network and subscriber management tools, and a line of wireless end-user routers, or modems.

Our head end routers and management tools are used by broadband wireless and cable operators at their base stations, or head ends, to connect Internet subscribers to the operator's networks in order to give the subscribers high-speed Internet access. Our head end products provide management systems that allow the operators to configure and manage their networks, to set systems alarms and to configure parameters for different priorities, and establish different levels of services and charges among end-users. These parameters enable the operators to give higher service to premium-paying, high-volume subscribers and allocate unused capacity to lower-volume groups.

The subscribers to the wireless operators' networks are typically single-computer customers, or local area networks (LANs), used by small businesses and high-end residential customers. The operators use our end-user products to connect subscribers to the wireless systems networks at the subscribers' sites.

Technology

We have a scalable and deployable system with field-tested technology that continues to evolve. We have developed solutions to multi-path interference and frequency drift and have incorporated these solutions into our current products. We continue to evolve and improve our technology through extensive deployments and are now able to service up to thousands of subscribers in one cell. We are also continuing to work in conjunction with system operators to continue to refine our technology in accordance with their needs. Hybrid's products support two-way transmission on either wireless or cable systems as well as asymmetric telephone return or router return.

Hybrid's Series 2000 system is expandable from an entry-level system to large systems that are designed to serve up to 20,000 routers/modems. It has been successfully deployed by wireless operators in systems that utilize multiple antennas at the head end to increase capacity. Each of the multiple return antennas is pointed in a slightly different direction, to increase the capacity of the available return frequency spectrum. Because most operators have only 10MHz of return channel capacity available, return sectorization is necessary to re-use spectrum until other options such as MMDS return are allowed

Downstream Optimization

Our patented proprietary sub-channelization technology splits a standard 6 MHz channel into three 2 MHz sub-channels for downstream transmission, providing greater service flexibility and minimizing the effects of multi-path interference in wireless systems. Sub-channels mitigate the effects of interference between transmitters and allow flexible sectorization in large installations. They can also be loaded differently to provide different grades of service. Our patented 2 MHz sub-channelization allows our products to serve the newer wireless communication services (WCS) bands, which are 5 and 10MHz wide.

Upstream Optimization

Our technology allows an operator's group of subscribers to share many 160 to 600 kHz bandwidth return channels. This provides redundancy and provides the resistance to the interference common in large wireless installations, especially those with multiple return sectors. Narrow channels allow smaller

antennas and lower power transceivers than are needed for conventional 1.6 to 2 MHz TDMA channels.

Our proprietary software not only allows subscribers to share many return channels, but also allows some to burst into a continuous transmission state to transfer or send large amounts of data upstream. The operator can control the parameters to optimize performance for business users yet still provide other users access to capacity. It is usual for some operators to set up two or three groups of return channels, often with different bandwidths so as to provide different service levels or groups for business and residential customers.

Alliances

Our products are integrated with other telecommunications equipment to create a complete wireless system. In 2000, Hybrid entered agreements with two global systems integrators, Andrew Corporation and Thomcast Communications, as well as with system integrators in targeted markets. Each of these system integrators offer wireless operators a complete turnkey system that integrates our products with the associated radio and Internet equipment needed to deploy a wireless system.

Products

Head end Equipment

CYBERMANAGER 2000. The CyberManager 2000 (CMG-2000) is our proprietary subscriber and network management workstation and allows the operator to set the service levels or groups, for both business and residential end-users. The CMG-2000 uses our software to provide the system administrator interface to the upstream and downstream routers and end-customer equipment. The CMG-2000 has a 10/100BaseT (Ethernet) interface to connect to a fast Ethernet switch in the head end.

CYBERMASTER DOWNSTREAM ROUTER. The CyberMaster Downstream Router (CMD-2000B) is a rack-mounted industrial microcomputer. It supports our proprietary Serial Interface (SIF) and Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) cards, which are used for downstream routing and for 64-QAM downstream modulation. The CMD-2000 has a 10/100BaseT interface to connect to a fast Ethernet switch within the headend.

CYBERMASTER UPSTREAM ROUTER QPSK RETURN. The Cybermaster upstream router is a rack-mounted industrial microcomputer. The product houses dual Quaternary Phase Shift Keying (QPSK) receiver cards that demodulate upstream QPSK signals. The CMU-2000-14CB has a 10/100BaseT interface to connect to a fast Ethernet switch at the head end.

Wireless Broadband Router

The Multi-User Wireless Broadband Router supports 10 Mbps, 64-QAM downstream data transmission on both wireless and cable systems and upstream transmission using a wireless or cable return, telephone modem or router. The current production router family includes the WBR-5, WBR-20, and WBR-60 with capacities of 5, 20, and 60 networked devices respectively, with their own distinct IP addresses. These units have a number of security features including system authentication and user ID.

Services

Our product support services include consulting, systems engineering, systems integration, installation, training, and technical support. Our network operations group also works with the customer during site preparation to aid in systems engineering, system integration, installation, and acceptance testing for system start-up.

Customers

Our customers are principally wireless system operators and national and regional telephone companies. A small number of customers have traditionally accounted for a large portion of our net sales. In 2000, Sprint Corporation accounted for 54% of our gross sales, while Look Communications (Canadian-based service provider) accounted for 23% of our gross sales. We had two customers that individually accounted for 31% and 28% of gross sales during 1999 and for 25% and 13% of gross sales in 1998.

In 2000, Sprint purchased our products to support what we believe constituted the largest number of MMDS deployments in the world during that year. Look Communications made substantial purchases in connection with their Canadian deployments. Overall international sales accounted for 24% of total sales during the year (virtually all of which were to Look Communication) and included deployments in Canada, Ireland, Nigeria, Korea, Peru, and Argentina.

Sprint Corporation holds 4,066,466 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase $8.4 million principal amount of convertible debentures which is convertible into 2,946,622 shares of our common stock. Two of our directors are Sprint designees, and we cannot issue any securities (with limited exceptions) or, in most cases, take any material corporate action without Sprint's approval. Sprint has other rights and privileges as well, including pre-emptive rights and a right of first refusal in the case of any proposed change of control transaction, which right of first refusal is assignable by Sprint to any third-party.

Prior to 2000, most of our sales were to cable customers. However, these sales represented only 6% of our total sales in 2000 and they will continue to represent a small portion of net sales in the future.

Sales and Marketing

Sales in 2000 were made primarily to companies in the United States and Canada. Sales are made through our field sales force as well as global and regional system integrators.

Customer internal procedures related to the completion of the evaluation and approval of the large capital expenditures that are typically required to purchase our products can result in purchasing delays. Customers usually engage in a significant technical evaluation before making a purchase commitment and any delay or loss of an order that is expected in a quarter can have a major effect on our sales and operating results for that quarter. As of December 31, 2000, the total amount of shipments not recognized as revenue due to acceptance or testing criteria or because they were sales to a distributor were $5.6 million.

Our product sales backlog on February 28, 2001 was $2.7 million and consisted of customer purchase orders which had been received and accepted and for which we have a reasonable expectation of shipment within the current fiscal period. The comparable backlog figure as of February 28, 2000 was $274,000.

Our marketing efforts are targeted to broadband wireless system operators in the U.S and abroad. Many of our international opportunities are marketed in tandem with one or more of our system integrators who often provide in-country support. Concentrated efforts in 2000 and 2001 have been, and will be, in the areas of South America, Australia, Korea, Malaysia, and China.

Manufacturing

We configure, test, and perform quality assurance procedures on the final product at the Hybrid facility. We outsource manufacturing of the product modules to third parties, while maintaining a limited in-house manufacturing capability for pre-production assembly and testing.

Our Series 2000 client routers are manufactured by Sharp Corporation through an agreement we have had since early 1997 with Sharp and its distributor, Itochu Corporation. We have not developed an alternative manufacturing source given the quality of the Sharp product and our limited volumes. We continue cost reduction efforts in response to market pressures to reduce our prices. Given that Sharp remains our only manufacturing source of our routers and production rates remain level, our ability to reduce the manufacturing costs may be limited.

Our CyberManager 2000 is built on the Ultra 10/Solaris platform by installing our proprietary network subscriber and network management software. Our CyberMaster Downstream Router and CyberMaster Upstream Router are built on Intel's Pentium-based PCI/ISA-based computer cards installed in a standard rack-mounted chassis from Industrial Computer Source. Our proprietary software, Hybrid OS, is overlaid on a standard Berkeley Systems operating system for the CMD and CMU.

We are dependent upon these and other key suppliers for a number of components within our Series 2000 products. The WBR series routers use a Texas Instrument chip set for the 64-QAM demodulator. Hitachi is the sole supplier of the processors used in our routers. Intel is currently the sole supplier for certain components used in our products. There can be no assurance that these and other single-source components will continue to be available to us, or that deliveries to us will not be interrupted or delayed (due to shortages or other factors). Having single-source components also makes it more difficult for us to reduce our costs for these components and makes us vulnerable to price increases by the component manufacturer. Any significant interruption or delay in the supply of components for our products or any increase in our costs for components, or our inability to reduce component costs, could adversely affect our business.

We typically provide a 12 to 18 month warranty on our hardware products that includes factory repair service. We also provide customer support as a purchase option that includes telephone and e-mail support, software maintenance releases, and technical bulletins.

Research and Development

As of December 31, 2000, our research and development staff consisted of 20 full-time employees, and eight local consultants. To supplement our research and development efforts, we have hired a consulting firm in India to work on various projects. Our total research and development expenses for 2000, 1999, and 1998 were $6,715,000, $4,191,000, and $7,771,000, respectively. Our research and development during 2000 was directed primarily towards improving the performance of our 2-way wireless products and reducing the cost of our routers. We enhanced our return product software and increased the capacity of the CMG 2000 and the WBR multi user modem.

In 2001, we are continuing our efforts to reduce the cost of manufacturing and improve the performance of client routers significantly through design and engineering changes. Our efforts to improve performance are focused on increasing coverage, capacity, and ease of installation.

Coverage: We are working to enhance our patented downstream sub-channels to enable the use of three modulation schemes. These include QPSK and 16-QAM, which are more robust and will allow successful operation in customer locations that may not currently be serviceable. Other features such as diversity are under development.

Capacity: Our new capability with multiple modulation schemes (ThruWAVE) will have multiple downstream interleaving options. This has the potential to increase the number of users that may share a return channel on the upstream by 20-40%, improving total number of active users on the system. Additionally, the use of QPSK and 16-QAM allows our customers the ability to put multiple cells into a geographic region and reuse frequencies in these cells, thus improving overall system capacity. We are also working on enhancements to our MAC layer to further increase the capacity.

Ease of Installation: Hybrid works continuously to simplify and reduce the installation of the CPE. Having the ability to use a variety of modulation schemes will allow the installation to proceed more rapidly. Hybrid is investigating, with numerous vendors (RF, wireless LAN, etc.), how to make the overall CPE installation simpler.

Competition

We are primarily engaged in the business of manufacturing FBBW high-speed Internet access equipment. Our market is intensely competitive and we expect even more competition in the future. Most of our competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution, customer support, and other resources, as well as greater name recognition and access to customers than we have.

The principal competitive factors in this market include:

Our principal competitors in the wireless market include Vyyo, Inc. (which is marketing a technology based on the Data Over Cable Systems Interface Specification (DOCSIS) standard) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (which is promoting Vector Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex or VOFDM). Other wireless competitors include ADC, Com21, IOSpan, Aperto, and Adaptive Broadband.

Participants in the wireless broadband access market have not settled on a technology standard for equipment to serve this market. Our major competitors have created or joined in consortia to promote the technology they are employing as the industry standard, which are different from our underlying technology. While Hybrid also actively promotes its technology, if the marketplace settles on a standard that we do not employ, our competitive position would be seriously impaired. We are not making material sales into the broadband cable access market because cable operators adopted the DOCSIS standard, to which our products do not conform.

Our Customer's Competition

Our customers compete with providers of other forms of high-speed Internet access, including DSL and cable. Telephone companies are deploying DSL, providing high-speed Internet access over existing phone wires. They are working with computer vendors to install DSL cards in PCs manufactured by those companies, thereby reducing the telephone companies' distribution costs. Although DSL poses a significant competitive threat to the services offered by our customers, in some instances, the availability of DSL service may be viewed as complementary to the use of fixed broadband wireless products. In other words, some operators may offer DSL service to customers in those locations where line-of-sight access may not be optimal, while also offering wireless service in areas where line-of-sight transmission is uninterrupted.

As our focus has shifted to wireless operators, cable operators may now be considered as competing with our customers for the end-user.

Intellectual Property

Patents

We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual restrictions to establish and protect proprietary rights in our products. We have received 14 patents from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. These patents are directed to various aspects of wireless and cable modems and head end systems. In addition, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued formal notices of allowances for pending patent applications which are also directed to wireless and cable modems and head end systems, as well as various modulation and transmission schemes used in wireless cable modem systems. We have other patent applications pending before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We have patent applications pending in a number of foreign jurisdictions as well. It is unknown whether any pending or foreign patent applications will result in the issuance of patents.

We cannot be certain that our patents will not be challenged or invalidated, or that the claims allowed in our patents will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage to us. We have initiated one patent infringement litigation to enforce our patent rights, and it resulted in a settlement in which we granted licenses to the defendants containing certain terms that are in some respects favorable to them, including a right of first refusal to purchase our patents that we granted to one defendant (Com21, Inc.) in the event that, in the future, we propose to sell our patents (separately or in conjunction with our other assets) to any third party. We do not know whether we will bring litigation in the future in an effort to assert our patent rights, or whether other companies will bring litigation challenging our patents. Any such litigation could be time consuming, costly, and could result in our patents being held invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, even if the patents are upheld or are not challenged, third parties might be able to develop other technologies or products without infringing any such patents.

Software Protection

We have entered into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, and we enter into non-disclosure agreements with certain of our suppliers, distributors and customers, in order to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. There can be no assurance that these contractual arrangements or the other steps we take to protect our intellectual property will prove sufficient to prevent misappropriation of our technology or deter independent third-party development of similar technologies. The laws of certain foreign countries may not protect our products or intellectual property rights to the same extent, as do the laws of the United States.

Infringement

We have in the past, received, and may in the future receive, notices from third parties claiming that our products, software or asserted proprietary rights infringe the proprietary rights of third parties. We expect that developers of wireless and cable modems will be increasingly subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our market grows. While we are not currently subject to any such claim, any future claim, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements might not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.

Employees

As of December 31, 2000, we had 62 full-time employees. None of our employees is represented by a collective bargaining unit with respect to his or her employment, and we have never experienced an organized work stoppage. We use consultants, contractors, and temporary workers to supplement our workforce and, as of December 31, 2000, we had 18 of these in various areas.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We currently sublease approximately 55,000 square feet of office, research and development and manufacturing space in San Jose, California. The sublease expires in April 2004, and we have an option to extend the term of the lease through October 2009.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Class Action Litigation

In June 1998, five class action lawsuits were filed in San Mateo County Superior Court, California against us, two of our directors, four former directors and two former officers. The lawsuits were brought on behalf of purchasers of our common stock during the class period commencing November 12, 1997 (the date of our initial public offering) and ending June 1, 1998. In July 1998, a sixth class action lawsuit was filed in the same court against the same defendants, although the class period was extended to June 18, 1998. All six lawsuits (the State Actions) also named as defendants the underwriters in our initial public offering, but the underwriters were dismissed from the cases.

The complaints in the State Actions claimed that we and the other defendants violated the anti-fraud provisions of the California securities laws, alleging that the financial statements used in connection with our initial public offering and the financial statements issued subsequently during the class period, as well as related statements made on our behalf during the initial public offering and subsequently regarding our past and prospective financial condition and results of operations, were false and misleading. The complaints also alleged that the other defendants and we made these misrepresentations in order to inflate the price of the Company's common stock for the initial public offering and during the class period. The other defendants and we denied the charges of wrongdoing.

In July and August 1998, two class action lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (the Federal Actions). Both of the Federal Actions were brought against the same defendants as the State Actions, except that the second Federal Action also named as a defendant Price Waterhouse Coopers, LLP (PWC), our former independent accountants. (The underwriters in our initial public offering were named as defendants in the first Federal Action but were subsequently dismissed.) The class period for the first Federal Action is from November 12, 1997 to June 1, 1998, and the class period in the second Federal Action extends to June 17, 1998. The complaints in both Federal Actions claimed that we and the other defendants violated the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, on the basis of allegations that are similar to those made by the plaintiffs in the state class action lawsuits. The other defendants and we denied these charges of wrongdoing.

We and the other parties (other than PWC) to the State Actions and the Federal Actions reached an agreement to settle the lawsuits in March 1999. The agreement was approved by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in June 1999. In November 1999, the settlement of the State Actions and the Federal Actions became final. The time to appeal from the Court's approval of the settlement has expired. Under the settlement, (i) our insurers paid $8.8 million on our behalf and on behalf of the other officer and director defendants, and (ii) we issued 3,045,000 shares of common stock to the plaintiffs and their counsel (750,000 shares were issued in November 1999 and the balance in February 2000). As a result of the settlement and a related agreement between us and our insurers,

we have paid, and will not be reimbursed by our insurers for, $1.2 million in attorneys fees and other litigation expenses that would otherwise be covered by our insurance, and we will not have insurance coverage for the attorneys fees and expenses relating to the settlement that we incur in the future.

SEC Investigation

In October 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission began a formal investigation of us and certain individuals with respect to our 1997 financial statements and public disclosures. During 1999, we produced documents in response to the Securities and Exchange Commission's subpoena and cooperated with the investigation. A number of current and former officers and employees and outside directors testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission's staff.

In November 1999, the SEC staff attorneys informed us in writing that the staff intended to file a civil injunctive action and seek civil monetary penalties against us for alleged violations of the federal securities laws.

On June 29, 2000, the SEC filed, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, a complaint against the Company and three former employees. On the same day, the court approved the Company's settlement with the SEC and entered judgment against the Company. The court's order enjoins the Company from violating the books and records and related provisions of the federal securities laws but does not include any monetary penalties or an injunction against the violation of the antifraud provisions of the securities laws. At December 31, 2000, the Company has accrued $775,000 in legal fees in connection with this settlement and related continuing matters.

The Company does not believe, based on current information, that the order will have a material adverse impact on the Company's business or financial condition.

Pacific Monolithics Lawsuit

In March 1999, Pacific Monolithics, Inc. (which had filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and is suing as debtor-in-possession) filed a lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court, California against us, two of our directors, four former directors (one of whom was subsequently dismissed), a former officer and PWC. The lawsuit concerns an agreement that we entered into in March 1998 to acquire Pacific Monolithics through a merger, which was never consummated. The complaint alleged that we induced Pacific Monolithics to enter into the agreement by providing it with our financial statements, and by making other representations concerning our financial condition and results of operations, which were false and misleading, and further alleged that we wrongfully failed to consummate the acquisition. The complaint claimed the defendants committed breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, as well as fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The complaint sought compensatory and punitive damages according to proof, plus attorneys' fees and costs. In July 1999, the court granted our motion to compel arbitration and to stay the lawsuit pending the outcome of the arbitration.

In October 1999, the plaintiff filed a demand for arbitration against us and the individual defendants with the San Francisco office of the American Arbitration Association. In the demand, the plaintiff alleged claims for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and negligent misrepresentation arising out of the proposed merger between the two companies. The demand sought unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, pre-judgement interest and attorneys' fees and costs. In November 1999, the individual defendants and we answered the demand by denying the claims and seeking an award of attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the agreement for the proposed merger. The arbitration hearing was held in September 2000.

On July 7, 2000, the Parties participated in a mediation of the dispute in San Jose, California before the Honorable (Ret.) Peter Stone of JAMS. The mediation resulted in a Stipulation for

Settlement of the litigation. The Parties formalized the terms of settlement by entering a Settlement Agreement & Mutual General Release and Covenant Not to Sue (the "Agreement") dated August 21, 2000. The Company's former auditors also joined in the Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, in full settlement and compromise of all of Pacific Monolithics' claims against the Company and its current and former officers and directors, and in exchange for Pacific Monolithics full release thereof, the Company agreed to deliver to Pacific Monolithics the total sum of 213,333 shares of the Company's common stock, valued at $2,000,000 as of July 7, 2000.

The Company delivered 213,333 shares of its common stock to Pacific Monolithics on September 14, 2000. On September 19, 2000, the Company filed, and the Santa Clara Superior Court entered, a Request for Dismissal with Prejudice of the lawsuit.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information for Common Stock

Our common stock was traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "HYBR" during the period from our initial public offering on November 12, 1997 through June 16, 1998. On June 17, 1998, trading in our common stock was suspended by the Nasdaq National Market, in response to our independent auditors, PWC, withdrawing their reports to our 1997 financial statements. The suspension continued until December 1, 1998, when our common stock was delisted by the Nasdaq National Market due to continuing noncompliance with listing requirements. From December 1, 1998 to July 5, 2000, our stock had been traded in the over-the-counter market on the pink sheets. On July 6, 2000, our stock was re-listed on Nasdaq. The table below shows the range of high and low closing sale prices reported. The table reflects inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark down or commission. On February 28, 2001, the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq was $3.94.

	High		Low
First Quarter 1998	$	13.00	$	4.00
Second Quarter 1998	$	8.75	$	2.13
Third Quarter 1998		Not Traded
Fourth Quarter 1998	$	0.75	$	0.13
First Quarter 1999	$	1.25	$	0.13
Second Quarter 1999	$	2.88	$	0.38
Third Quarter 1999	$	9.03	$	2.00
Fourth Quarter 1999	$	20.00	$	4.75
First Quarter 2000	$	24.50	$	8.00
Second Quarter 2000	$	13.50	$	4.75
Third Quarter 2000	$	20.19	$	5.56
Fourth Quarter 2000	$	18.75	$	3.13

Stockholders

As of December 31, 2000, there were approximately 660 holders of record of our common stock

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our capital stock to date. We currently anticipate that we will retain any future earnings for use in our business and do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The terms of our outstanding debentures and our agreement with Sprint prohibit us from paying any cash dividends without the consent of the debenture holders and Sprint.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and related notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

				Years Ended December 31,
				2000			1999			1998			1997(1)			1996
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Gross sales				$	29,924		$	13,423		$	12,418		$	4,120		$	2,962
Sales discounts					(7,129	)		(407	)		—			—			—
Net sales					22,795			13,016			12,418			4,120			2,962
Cost of sales					23,139			13,341			14,046			8,899			3,130
Gross profit					(344	)		(325	)		(1,628	)		(4,779	)		(168	)
Operating expenses:
	Research and development				6,715			4,191			7,771			7,831			5,076
	Sales and marketing				16,491			1,740			3,642			4,678			1,786
	General and administrative				11,625			7,660			8,933			2,964			1,714
	Asset impairment charge				—			—			1,250			—			—
	Write off of technology license				—			—			1,283			—			—
		Total operating expenses			34,831			13,591			22,879			15,473			8,576
			Loss from operations		(35,175	)		(13,916	)		(24,507	)		(20,252	)		(8,744	)
Interest income and other expense, net					(717	)		171			779			316			257
Interest expense					(1,311	)		(8,447	)		(897	)		(1,666	)		(28	)
Net loss				$	(37,203	)	$	(22,192	)	$	(24,625	)	$	(21,602	)	$	(8,515	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share				$	(2.03	)	$	(2.08	)	$	(2.37	)	$	(6.10	)	$	(3.36	)
Shares used in basic and diluted per share calculation (2)					18,309			10,678			10,410			3,541			2,535

	December 31,
	2000		1999			1998			1997(1)		1996
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,878	$	13,394		$	3,966		$	27,143	$	3,886
Working capital		6,324		11,527			(812	)		23,795		6,944
Total assets		19,664		21,152			15,420			39,065		10,539
Long-term debt		5,632		23,978			419			654		472
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		2,957		(9,820	)		2,702			27,303		7,709

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THE DISCUSSION BELOW SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO INCLUDED IN ITEM 8 OF THIS REPORT. THE DISCUSSION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS RELATING TO FUTURE EVENTS OR FINANCIAL RESULTS, SUCH AS STATEMENTS INDICATING THAT "WE BELIEVE," "WE EXPECT," "WE ANTICIPATE" OR "WE INTEND" THAT CERTAIN EVENTS MAY OCCUR OR CERTAIN TRENDS MAY CONTINUE. OTHER FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INCLUDE STATEMENTS ABOUT THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF PRODUCTS OR TECHNOLOGIES, MATTERS RELATING TO OUR PROPRIETARY RIGHTS, FACILITIES NEEDS, OUR LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL NEEDS AND OTHER STATEMENTS ABOUT FUTURE MATTERS. ALL THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. YOU SHOULD NOT RELY TOO HEAVILY ON THESE STATEMENTS; ALTHOUGH THEY REFLECT THE GOOD FAITH JUDGMENT OF OUR MANAGEMENT, THEY INVOLVE FUTURE EVENTS THAT MIGHT NOT OCCUR. WE CAN ONLY BASE SUCH STATEMENTS ON FACTS AND FACTORS THAT WE CURRENTLY KNOW. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE IN THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF VARIOUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE SET FORTH UNDER "RISK FACTORS" AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-K.

Overview

General

We are a broadband access equipment company that designs, develops, manufactures and markets wireless systems that provide high-speed access to the Internet for businesses and consumers. Our products greatly accelerate the response time for accessing bandwidth-intensive information. Since 1996, our principal product line has been the Hybrid Series 2000, which consists of head end routers, network and subscriber management tools and a line of wireless end-user routers or modems.

We currently sell our products primarily in the United States and Canada, although we are pursuing opportunities in other countries and we think that international sales may represent an increasingly greater proportion of our sales in the future. Our customers primarily include broadband wireless system operators and national and regional telephone companies. A small number of customers have accounted for a substantial portion of our net sales, and we expect that trend to continue. As a result, we have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, significant fluctuations in our results of operations on a quarterly and an annual basis. The sales cycle for our products has been lengthy, and is subject to a number of significant risks, including customers' budgetary constraints and internal acceptance reviews. Any delay or loss of an order that is expected in a quarter can have a major effect on our sales and operating results for that quarter. The same is true of any failure of a customer to pay for products on a timely basis.

The market for high-speed network connectivity products and services is intensely competitive and is characterized by rapid technological change, new product development, product obsolescence, and evolving industry standards. Our ability to develop and offer competitive products on a timely basis could have a material effect on our business. The market for our products has historically experienced significant price erosion over the life of a product, and we have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, pressure on our unit average selling prices. While we have initiated cost reduction programs to offset pricing pressures on our products, there can be no assurance that we will keep pace with competitive price pressures or improve our gross margins. Further, we anticipate that in the future the

sales mix of our products will be increasingly weighted toward lower-margin products, thereby adversely affecting our gross margins.

At December 31, 2000, we had 62 full-time employees and 18 local consultants, contractors, and temporary workers.

Revenue Recognition

We normally ship our products based upon a bona fide purchase order and volume purchase agreement. We recognize revenue at the time a transaction is shipped and collection of the resulting account receivable is probable. Shipments on customer orders with acceptance criteria, installation criteria or rights of return are recognized as revenue only when the criteria are satisfied. Revenue related to shipments to distributors is normally recognized upon receipt of payment for such transactions. As of December 31, 2000, the total amount of shipments not recognized as revenue due to acceptance or testing criteria or because they were sold to a distributor was $5.6 million, of which $4.9 million was in connection with shipments to Sprint. Sprint's purchases of head end equipment are generally subject to testing and acceptance procedures and the Company anticipates that it will continue to defer recognition of revenue for those shipments until those procedures have been satisfied and the products have been accepted by Sprint. In 2000, the Company recognized $16.1 million as gross revenue from sales to Sprint Corporation.

During 2000, we generally sold our software together with a one-year technical support contract, for which we charge separately, to provide upgrades, maintenance, system support and service. We recognized revenue on the software sale without reference to the maintenance contract, and we recognized revenue on the technical support contract over its term on a straight-line basis. Prior to 2000, we generally sold our software together with a three-year technical support contract for which we did not charge separately. We recognized the revenue attributable to these software and technical support contracts over the three-year period. Other service revenue, primarily training and consulting, is generally recognized at the time the service is performed.

In September 1999, Sprint committed to purchase $10 million of our products subject to certain conditions. In connection with Sprint's commitment, we issued to Sprint warrants to purchase up to $8,397,873 in debentures that are convertible into 2,946,622 shares of our common stock at $2.85 per share. Ten percent of the warrants became exercisable on the shipment dates when aggregate shipments of products and services pursuant to purchase orders submitted by Sprint to the Company were at least $1million. Thereafter, each additional shipment of $1 million entitled Sprint to exercise an additional 10% of its warrants, until all shipments aggregated $10,000,000. In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services are accounted for using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS 123. SFAS 123 requires that in each period in which the warrants are earned, a non-cash charge is to be recorded. The amount of such shipments during the year ended December 31, 2000 reached the $10,000,000 maximum and therefore, the warrants became fully exercisable. We originally determined that this warrant had an estimated value, using the Black-Scholes valuation model, of $16.1 million, which was fully applied as $2.5 million of sales discounts and $13.6 million of sales and marketing expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2000. As part of the year-end closing process, we determined that subsequent events and market conditions necessitated further analysis of the warrants' estimated value. In particular, the probability of Sprint's near term exercise of its warrants diminished with our success in raising equity capital in February 2001, Sprint's November 2000 announcement of its change in focus of its broadband efforts for consumers and small businesses, and the recent drop in our stock price. Consequently, we applied the Black-Scholes method using a longer expected life of the warrants, that is, the full contract term, and arrived at an estimated warrant value of $20.8 million. We applied the additional $4.7 million arising from this change in estimate as sales discounts in the fourth quarter of 2000.

Warranty Costs

We accrue for estimated warranty costs when the related sales revenue is recognized. Our modem manufacturer, Sharp Corporation, provides warranty on all cable routers manufactured by them. We provide a warranty on all head end equipment and CPE equipment that ranges between 12 and 18 months, and we typically provide a 90-day warranty on software media.

Net Losses

We incurred net losses for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998 of $37,203,000, $22,192,000, and $24,625,000, respectively. Our accumulated deficit was $122,964,000 as of December 31, 2000. We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

Results of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998

NET SALES. After non-cash sales discounts of $7,129,000 in 2000 and $407,000 in 1999, net sales increased 75% to $22,795,000 in 2000 from $13,016,000 in 1999 and 5% from $12,418,000 in 1998 to $13,016,000 in 1999. There were no non-cash sales discounts in 1998. Broadband wireless system operators accounted for 94% of sales in 2000, 48% in 1999, and 43% of sales in 1998. The growth in revenues in 2000 compared to 1999 is primarily due to increased sales of fixed broadband wireless equipment, particularly to Sprint Corporation and Look Communication. Although Look Communications purchased a substantial amount of our equipment in 2000, we expect to make limited sales to them in 2001.

International sales accounted for 24% of gross sales in 2000, 5% in 1999, and 0% in 1998. In 2000, Hybrid systems were deployed in Canada, Ireland, Nigeria, Korea, Peru, and Argentina.

GROSS MARGIN. Gross margin was negative 1.5% in 2000, negative 2.5% in 1999, and negative 13.1% in 1998. The improved gross margins from 1998 to 1999 and from 1999 to 2000 were due to a favorable change in the product mix, changes in the customer mix, increased volume spread over fixed cost of sales components, and improved margin for head end routers. We believe that in 2001 our existing customers are likely to purchase a greater proportion of CPEs relative to head end equipment as compared to 2000. We earn substantially higher margins on our head end equipment than on CPEs and, consequently, expect that gross margin for 2001 will decline unless we either make substantial head end sales to new customers or secure better margins on the CPEs that we sell to our current customers.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expenses include ongoing head end and software development expenses as well as design expenditures associated with new product development, new product production, manufacturing cost reduction programs and improvements in the manufacturing of existing products. Research and development expenses were $6,715,000, $4,191,000, and $7,771,000 for 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. Research and development expenses included non-cash charges of $470,000, $668,000, and $0 in 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively for compensation recognized on stock options granted at exercise prices below fair market value to employees and consultants engaged in research and development. The increase in research and development expenses in 2000 as compared to 1999 was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs, consulting fees, outside services, and project material costs. The decrease in research and development expenses in 1999 as compared to 1998 was due to reduced staffing and associated engineering costs.

SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses include primarily salaries and related payroll costs for sales and marketing personnel, commissions, advertising, promotions and travel. Sales and marketing expenses were $16,491,000, $1,740,000, and $3,642,000 during 2000, 1999, and 1998,

respectively and included charges related to the Sprint Warrant in 2000. Sales and marketing expenses included non-cash charges of $47,000, $88,000, and $0 in 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively for compensation recognized on stock options granted at exercise prices below fair market value for employees and consultants engaged in sales and marketing. In 2000, the company incurred non-cash charges, totaling $13,671,000, due to the recording of the fair value of the earned, but unexercised Sprint warrants described above. The increase in sales and marketing expenses in 2000 as compared to 1999 was due to the Sprint warrant charge and to an increase in personnel costs and consulting fees. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses in 1999 as compared to 1998 was due principally to a decrease in headcount and related payroll costs and reduced expenses for advertising, promotion and travel. We expect to increase our sales and marketing expenses as we expand our sales and marketing efforts in future periods.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses consist mainly of salaries and benefits for administrative officers and support personnel, travel expenses, legal, accounting, and consulting fees. General and administrative expenses were $11,625,000, $7,660,000, and $8,933,000 during 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. General and administrative expenses included non-cash charges of $287,000, $219,000, and $0 during 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively for compensation recognized on stock options granted at exercise prices below fair market value to employees and consultants engaged in providing general and administrative services. In addition, the 2000 general and administrative expenses also included non-cash charges of $3,176,000 relating to the separation of two executives of the Company, and $2,000,000 in connection with the Pacific Monolithics lawsuit (see Item 3 "Legal Proceedings"). No such charges were recorded to general and administrative expenses in 1999 and 1998. Excluding the non-cash charges described above, general and administrative expenses in 2000 decreased $1,279,000 compared to 1999. This decrease was due to further reductions in legal fees that were offset in part by increases in personnel related costs. The decrease in general and administrative expenses in 1999 as compared to 1998 was primarily due to a decrease in legal, audit and consulting fees offset by a slight increase in reserves in connection with the settlement of certain class action litigation and with an SEC investigation.

INTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE) AND OTHER. The Company incurred net interest expense of $2,028,000, $8,276,000, and $118,000 in 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. In August 1999, we issued $18.1 million of convertible debentures that were converted into common stock in June 2000. In 2000, net interest expense included a premium paid on the conversion of the debentures resulting in a beneficial conversion element valued at $1,170,000. The increase in net interest expense in 1999 compared to 1998 was due to amortization of the deemed discount on the debentures of $7,400,000, which resulted from the difference between the conversion price of the convertible debentures and the then market price of our common stock. This deemed discount was amortized through December 31, 1999 (the date on which the debentures became convertible). Excluding the $7,400,000 discount in 1999, the increase in interest expense in 1999 compared to 1998 was due to accrued interest on the convertible debentures. Excluding the $1,170,000 premium paid in 2000 and the $7,400,000 deemed discount in 1999, interest expense would have been $858,000 and $876,000 in 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have historically financed our operations primarily through a combination of debt, equity and equipment lease financing. In 1997, we raised $42.5 million in net proceeds through our initial public offering (in November 1997) and other debt and equity financing. By September 1999, our cash and cash equivalents had been virtually exhausted. In September 1999, we raised $18.1 million through the issuance and sale of convertible debentures to Sprint (in the amount of $11.0 million) and certain venture capital sources (in the amount of $7.1 million). During the quarter ended June 30, 2000, at the request of the Company, the holders agreed to convert the entire principal amounting to a face value

of $18.1 million plus accrued interest through June 30, 2000 of $594,000, into 6,559,310 shares of common stock. Upon the conversion, we paid a premium, as an inducement to the holder's equivalent to the interest that would have been added to the principal of the debentures for the third and fourth quarters of 2000, amounting to $375,750. The premium was paid in the form of additional shares of common stock calculated at the conversion price of $2.85 per share and was equivalent to 131,842 shares of common stock.

Additionally, Sprint acquired warrants to purchase up to $8.4 million of additional convertible debentures, which debentures were convertible at December 31, 2000 into 2,946,622 shares of common stock common stock, on the same terms as the convertible debentures referred to above. The warrants were issued in consideration for Sprint's obligation to purchase at least $10 million of our products. The amount of shipments in 2000 totaled at least $10,000,000. Assuming that as of December 31, 2000, Sprint exercised all its warrants, it would own 7,013,000 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 28.2% of the 24,881,570 shares of our common stock that would then be outstanding (assuming no other security holders exercised their options, warrants or conversion privileges). On a fully diluted basis, assuming that as of December 31, 2000 all other security holders exercised their options, warrants and conversion privileges as well as Sprint, Sprint would own approximately 21.6% of the 32,431,063 fully diluted shares of our common stock that would then be outstanding. The actual and fully diluted shares at December 31, 2000 do not include shares of underlying convertible debentures and warrants that we sold in February 2001.

In addition to the above financing, we have outstanding a senior secured convertible debenture in the face amount of $5.5 million due in April 2002 and bearing interest at 12% per annum, payable quarterly. The conversion price is subject to weighted average antidilution provisions whereby, if we issue shares in the future for consideration below the existing conversion price, then (with certain exceptions) the conversion price will automatically be decreased, allowing the holder of the debenture to receive additional shares of common stock upon conversion.

Pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 16, 2001 between the Halifax Fund, a fund managed by the Palladin Group, and the Company, we issued and sold to the Halifax Fund on February 16, 2001 certain securities. The securities included (i) a $7.5 million principal amount 6% Convertible Debenture due 2003, which will be convertible into shares of the Company's common stock; (ii) a common stock Purchase Warrant to purchase 833,333 shares of common stock at $9.00 per share (subject to adjustment) which is exercisable at the election of Palladin, or at the election of the Company at a price per share the lower of which is (a) $9.00 and (b) 94% of the daily volume weighted average price; and (iii) an Adjustment Warrant. The Adjustment Warrant will be exercisable beginning on the 18th day following the date (referred to in this discussion as the Effective Date) that there is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission the registration statement that the Company is required to file with respect to the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the debentures and warrants. The Adjustment Warrant will only be exercisable, however, if the volume weighted average sale price for our common stock is not more than $7.2694 per share. The aggregate number of shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of the Adjustment Warrant will be determined by dividing $8,625,000 by the Adjustment Price, as defined below, and then subtracting the sum of the number of shares of common stock previously issued pursuant to the conversion of the debenture and the number issued upon any previous exercise of the Adjustment Warrant. The Adjustment Price is the average of the 15 lowest daily volume weighted average sale prices of the Company's common stock as reported on Nasdaq, not including the three lowest days, during the 65 trading day period following the Effective Date. The adjustment price will not be below $3.50 per share. The adjustment warrant terminates three months after the end of the 65 trading day adjustment period. In consideration for such securities, Palladin paid an initial purchase price of $7,500,000. The Company granted to Palladin in the purchase agreement certain rights of first refusal, preemptive rights and other rights. Pursuant to

the purchase agreement, Palladin and the Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 16, 2001.

Net cash used in operating activities was $11,742,000, $8,017,000, and $19,302,000 during 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. The net cash used in operating activities in 2000 was primarily the result of our net loss of $37,203,000 and an increase in net current assets related to operating activities of $9,517,000, offset by the beneficial conversion of convertible debentures of $20,800,000, non-cash compensation charges of $4,596,000 recognized on the grant of stock and stock options to employees and consultants at exercise prices which were lower than fair market on the date of grant, non-cash charges related to the issuance of stock for settlement of litigation of $2,000,000, non-cash charges related to the issuance of common stock to induce conversion of debentures of $1,170,000, and an increase in current liabilities of $5,698,000. The net cash used in operating activities in 1999 was primarily the result of our net loss of $22,192,000, partially offset by non-cash charges attributable to the amortization of a deemed discount on the debentures amounting to $7,394,000, depreciation and amortization charges of $1,323,000, non-cash compensation charges of $1,031,000, and a reduction in net current operating assets of $3,158,000. Net cash used in operating activities in 1998 was primarily due to our net loss of $24,625,000, partially offset by non-cash charges of $6,336,000 and an increase in net current assets related to operating activities of $1,013,000.

Net cash used in investing activities was $788,000, $21,000, and $3,014,000 in 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. Aggregate capital expenditures for property and equipment (primarily computers, leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and engineering test equipment) were $788,000, $21,000, and $3,907,000 in 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. The significant decrease in capital expenditures in 2000 and 1999 as compared to 1998 was primarily due to higher expenditures for leasehold improvements in 1998 that were offset by proceeds from short- term investments of cash reserves. In the past, we have funded a substantial portion of our property and equipment expenditures from direct vendor leasing programs and third party commercial lease arrangements. At December 31, 2000, we did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures.

Net cash provided by financing activities of $1,014,000 in 2000 was primarily due from the net proceeds of $1,349,000 from the exercise of stock options. Net cash provided by financing activities was $17,981,000 in 1999 primarily due from proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures and related common stock warrants and from issuance of common stock for $18,446,000, offset by repayment of capital lease obligations amounting to $465,000. Net cash used in financing activities was $391,000 in 1998 primarily as a result of payment of $478,000 on capital lease obligations, partially offset by net proceeds of $87,000 from the exercise of stock options. At December 31, 2000, our liquidity consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $1,878,000 and working capital of $6,324,000.

Other than the agreement with Palladin above, as of December 31, 2000 we have no available line of credit or other source of borrowings or financing. We believe that, with respect to our current operations, our cash balance, after giving effect to the financing completed in February 2001, plus revenues from operations and non-operating cash receipts will be sufficient to meet our working capital and expenditure needs through 2001. We may seek additional financing during 2001 through debt, equity or equipment lease financing, or through a combination of financing vehicles. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all, when we require it.

Seasonality and Inflation

We do not believe that our business is seasonal or is impacted by inflation.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133). The new standard requires companies to record derivatives on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value. Under SFAS 133, gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of derivatives are to be reported in the statement of operations or as a deferred item, depending on the use of the derivatives and whether they qualify for hedge accounting. The key criterion for hedge accounting is that the derivative must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged items during the term of the hedge. This statement was amended by SFAS 137, issued in June 1999, such that it is effective for the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001. The Company currently transacts substantially all of its revenues and costs in U.S. dollars and to date has not entered into any material amounts of derivative instruments. Accordingly, management does not currently expect adoption of this new standard to have a significant impact on the Company.

Risk Factors

AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW AND THE OTHER INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-K BEFORE INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK. THE RISKS DESCRIBED BELOW ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES WE FACE. ADDITIONAL RISKS THAT WE ARE NOT AWARE OF OR THAT WE CURRENTLY BELIEVE ARE IMMATERIAL MAY BECOME IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT AFFECT OUR BUSINESS. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS OCCUR, OR IF OTHERS OCCUR, OUR BUSINESS, OPERATING RESULTS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION COULD BE SERIOUSLY HARMED AND THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD DECLINE.

WE LIKELY WILL NEED ADDITIONAL CAPITAL.

Although we raised over $35 million in net proceeds from our initial public offering in November 1997, our capital resources were virtually exhausted by September 1999. In September 1999, we raised $18.1 million through the issuance and sale of convertible debentures. In February 2001, we entered an agreement with a fund of The Palladin Group under which we have received $7.5 million of cash financing and may receive up to an additional $7.5 million. While we believe we have sufficient capital to continue operations through the year 2001, we likely will be required to raise additional cash in the future to support further growth in our business. We have agreed with Sprint Corporation to manufacture, ship, test, install and perform maintenance on certain quantities of our products this year. In addition, we have agreed to provide other services including enhancing our existing products and developing certain new products. This agreement with Sprint and other orders that we have recently received will increase our need for capital.

Our ability to raise additional capital may be limited by a number of factors, including (i) Sprint's veto rights, right of first refusal and other substantial rights and privileges, (ii) our dependence upon Sprint's business (which is not assured) and, to a lesser extent, the business of a few other customers, (iii) possible continuing uncertainties and concerns as a result of our past financial reporting difficulties, class action litigation and related issues, (iv) our need to increase our work force quickly and effectively and to reduce the cost of our existing products and develop new products, (v) uncertainty regarding our financial condition and results of operations, (vi) our history of heavy losses, and (vii) the other risk factors referred to below. We can give no assurance that we will be able to raise the additional capital we will need in the future or that any financing we may be able to obtain will not be on terms that are detrimental to our business and our ability to raise additional capital. We may not have sufficient capital or other resources necessary to meet the requirements of the Sprint

agreement and other large customers in the future. Accordingly, we may need to seek strategic alliances with other companies to assist in the development of new products and services. We might not be able to form such alliances at all or on terms that are beneficial for us.

WE ARE LARGELY DEPENDENT ON SPRINT.

We expect that our future business will primarily come from wireless customers and Sprint has acquired or controls our principal wireless customers. Accordingly, our future business will be substantially dependent upon orders from Sprint or from companies selling to Sprint. Sprint is currently using our products in connection with its initial offering of wireless Internet access services. We have only a small number of other customers.

Sprint also possesses substantial corporate governance rights. By virtue of the various agreements in connection with the purchase of $11 million in convertible debentures, Sprint may designate two directors of the Board. Under the terms of our agreements with Sprint, we cannot issue any securities (with limited exceptions) or, in most cases, take material corporate action without Sprint's approval. Sprint has other rights and privileges, including pre-emptive rights and a right of first refusal in the case of any proposed change of control transaction, which right of first refusal is assignable by Sprint to any third party. Furthermore, if Sprint exercises all its warrants (and assuming that no other warrant holders exercise), Sprint would own as of December 31, 2000, approximately 28.2% of our common stock on a beneficial ownership basis and 21.6% of our common stock on a fully diluted basis. As a result, Sprint will have a great deal of influence on us in the future. We have no assurance that Sprint will exercise this influence in our best interests, as Sprint's interests are in many respects different than ours (e.g., in deciding whether to purchase our products, in negotiating the price and other terms of any of those purchases and in deciding whether or not to support any future investment in us or any future strategic partnering or sale opportunity).

We have entered into an equipment purchase agreement with Sprint that imposes substantial requirements on us. We must meet Sprint's schedule for the manufacture and shipment of products; we must develop certain new products and enhance existing products according to Sprint's schedule and specifications; we must perform substantial installation and maintenance services; and we have agreed to the "open architecture" principle whereby we will license our technology to qualified third parties. In addition, Sprint's obligation to purchase our products is subject to extensive testing and acceptance procedures. If we fail to meet the requirements of the agreement, we could be subject to heavy penalties, including the obligation to license our intellectual property rights to Sprint on a royalty-free basis and Sprint may gain access to key source code of our products.

CHANGES IN PLANS OR CIRCUMSTANCES AT OUR LARGEST CUSTOMERS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR SALES.

In late 2000, Sprint completed a reorganization of its operations that included the business to which we sell our products. At that time, Sprint announced that in the residential and small business areas it was focusing its broadband efforts on the thirteen markets where it had already deployed systems and that once it reached a comfort level that products and services were in line with customer expectations and requirements that it would begin a nationwide deployment. In light of these plans, we expect to sell a relatively smaller amount of our higher margin head end equipment to Sprint until they commence their nationwide deployment and our sales and gross margins could be adversely affected.

In late 2000, Look Communications, our second largest customer for that year, encountered difficulties in securing additional financing to support the continued growth of its operations. We believe that Look Communications is exploring alternatives to obtain additional financing but cannot be assured that it will succeed. We expect to make limited sales to Look Communications in 2001.

WE HAVE NOT BEEN PROFITABLE TO DATE, AND WE MAY NEVER BE PROFITABLE. WE EXPECT CONTINUING LOSSES FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

We have not been profitable to date, and we cannot assure that we will ever achieve or sustain profitability. We were organized in 1990 and have had operating losses every year to date. Our accumulated deficit was $122,964,000 as of December 31, 2000 and $85,761,000 as of December 31, 1999. The revenue and profit potential of our business is unproven. The market for our products has only recently begun to develop, is rapidly changing, has an increasing number of competing technologies and competitors, and many of the competitors are significantly larger than we are. We have experienced price pressure on sales of our products in the past and these pressures continue. We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future.

WE MUST BE ABLE TO QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY DEVELOP NEW PRODUCTS, DEVELOP ENHANCEMENTS FOR OUR EXISTING PRODUCTS, AND DEPLOY OUR PRODUCTS ON A MUCH LARGER SCALE THAN WE HAVE IN THE PAST, AND WE MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO MEET THESE CHALLENGES.

In order to meet the existing and future demands of the broadband wireless and cable markets, we must develop new products and enhance our existing products. In addition, Sprint and other potential large scale customers will require us to demonstrate that our system can be successfully deployed on a much larger scale than it has been in the past. We might not be able to meet these challenges.

Sprint and other potential customers are also requesting the ability to deploy equipment that can serve subscribers who do not have a direct line-of-sight to the base station's transmit and receive tower. In some regions only 30% of the potential subscribers can be reached with line-of-sight equipment. The non line-of-sight deployments require the wireless system to operate with significantly reduced signal levels and increased signal distortions. The effect and magnitude of these factors varies widely and depends on many environmental factors. Hybrid is developing new products to operate in some non line-of-sight locations. There is no assurance that these new products will successfully solve all the non line-of-sight problems or that the wireless operators will accept these new products. If another company is successful in deploying a cost effective non line-of-sight system before we do, our business will be adversely affected.

WE ARE LARGELY DEPENDENT ON THE BROADBAND WIRELESS MARKET, AN EMERGING MARKET SUBJECT TO UNCERTAINTIES.

Prior to 2000, over half our sales have been to cable customers. We have been, as expected, essentially shut out of the market of new installations for cable customers by the general adoption of the DOCSIS standard. This is a standard to which our products do not conform. The wireless industry has not adopted DOCSIS. Accordingly, the DOCSIS standard has inhibited our sales to cable customers, but it has not, to date, affected our ability to market to wireless system operators.

The market for broadband Internet access products has only recently begun to develop. In the past, the broadband wireless industry has been adversely affected by chronic under-capitalization. Recent investments by Sprint and Worldcom in wireless operators had a significant effect upon the industry. One effect has been to attract major competitors. Cisco is testing high-speed Internet access products for wireless applications using a new technology that Cisco claims will replace existing technologies, including ours. It is a variant of OFDM. We face other major competition in the wireless market as well.

The wireless industry also competes with other technologies such as cable and DSL, to provide high-speed Internet access. Cable companies providing Internet access and telephone companies providing Internet access through DSL service are expanding into areas that were previously considered commercially reachable only by wireless service. The principal disadvantage of wireless is that it

currently requires a direct line-of-sight between the wireless operator's antenna and the customer's location. Physical interruptions such as buildings, trees or uneven terrain can interfere with reception, thus limiting broadband wireless system operators' customer bases. In addition, wireless customers face a number of licensing and regulatory restrictions.

Conditions in the wireless market could change rapidly and significantly as a result of technological changes, and the development and market acceptance of alternative technologies could decrease the demand for our products or render them obsolete. There can be no assurance that the wireless industry market will grow or that our products will be accepted in the emerging market.

EVOLVING INDUSTRY STANDARDS, COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES MAY HURT OUR BUSINESS.

Our products are not in compliance with the DOCSIS standard that has been adopted by cable operators or with the DAVIC standard that is supported in Europe. The emergence of these standards has hurt our cable business, and the adoption of wireless industry standards in the future could also have a similar adverse effect.

The market for high-speed Internet access products is characterized by rapidly changing technologies and short product life cycles. The rapid development of new competing technologies increases the risk that our products could be rendered noncompetitive. Future advances in technology may not be beneficial to, or compatible with, our business and products, and we might not be able to respond to the changes in technology, or our response might not be timely or cost-effective. Market acceptance of new technologies and our failure to develop and introduce new products and enhancements to keep pace with technological developments could hurt our business.

Some firms that are developing broadband wireless systems and products are much larger than we are. These firms and other smaller firms are not all using the same technological base and approach. In order to promote their products, these competing firms are seeking to develop consortia and other alliances to promote their technology as the industry standard. If technologies other than the approach we are pursuing are adopted as the standard, our products could lose acceptance in the marketplace and our growth would be seriously impaired.

WE FACE SIGNIFICANT COMPETITION, INCLUDING COMPETITION FROM LARGE COMPANIES.

Our market is intensely competitive, and we expect even more competition in the future. Most of our competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution, customer support, and other resources, as well as greater name recognition and access to customers, than we have. One of our principal competitors, Cisco, has recently announced that it has a competitive wireless technology that will provide superior cost/benefit performance and will operate successfully in environments in which it is difficult to obtain a clear line-of-sight as well as environments with multi-path interference (around buildings, flat roofs and water, for example). Although we believe Cisco has not yet installed a commercially operating system using this technology, we cannot assure you that it will not do so or that Cisco's system will not provide benefits superior to ours. We believe that other companies also have products under development to mitigate line-of-sight limitations.

We are primarily engaged in the market for FBBW high-speed Internet access equipment. In addition, our customers compete with other forms of high-speed Internet access including DSL and cable. While we believe our products and services are competitive with or superior to those of our competitors, our product development may be adversely affected by the lack of engineering resources. Conditions in our market could change rapidly and significantly as a result of technological changes, and the development and market acceptance of alternative technologies could decrease the demand for our products or render them obsolete. Similarly, the continued emergence or evolution of industry

standards or specifications may put us at a disadvantage in relation to our competitors. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the future.

We have agreed with Sprint that in the future we will allow third parties to license our technology and offer products in competition with ours, using our technology. This could generate significant new competitive challenges for us. It might also not meet our objective of creating a defacto standard for working systems.

Our business depends upon the technical success and working relationships of our allies producing other parts of the system. As an example, one transceiver must be installed for each Hybrid Wireless Broadband Router. California Amplifier has the major share of the transceiver market in Sprint and many other accounts and our customer sales would be limited if California Amplifier fails to meet their needs. Three vendors produce transmitters and the vendor is often chosen because their product already matches the transmitters in place when the spectrum is acquired. Two transmitter producers, Thomcast and EMCEE, resell Hybrid products. Many of the Sprint deployments use transmitters produced by ADC, a competitor to Hybrid. The head end down-converters and antennas are produced by this same group of companies. Andrew Corporation supplies transmitter antennas. The effective alliances in place that support free sales of our products may not continue to provide this support.

To be successful, we must respond promptly and effectively to the challenges of new competitive products and tactics, alternate technologies, technological changes and evolving industry standards. We must continue to develop products with improved performance over two-way wireless transmission facilities. There can be no assurance that we will meet these challenges.

WE FACE LITIGATION RISKS.

We may be exposed to litigation in the future. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to determine the validity and scope of our patents, and to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation might result in substantial costs as well as a diversion of managerial resources and attention. Furthermore, our business activities may infringe upon the proprietary rights of others, and they may claim that our products infringe upon their proprietary rights. Any such claims, with or without merit, could result in significant litigation costs and diversion of management attention, as well as harm to our business, including having to enter into royalty and license agreements that may have terms that are disadvantageous to us. If litigation is successful against us, it could result in the invalidation of our proprietary rights and our incurring liability for damages, which could have a harmful effect on our business. We initiated one patent infringement litigation to enforce our patent rights, and it resulted in a settlement in which we granted licenses to the defendants containing terms that are in some respects favorable to them, including a right of first refusal to purchase our patents that we granted to one defendant (Com21, Inc.) in the event that we propose in the future to sell our patents (whether separately or together with our other assets) to any third party. Nonetheless, we may find it necessary to institute further infringement litigation in the future and third parties may institute litigation against us challenging the validity of our patents. We may also face litigation over other aspects of our business, including employment or other commercial matters that, if concluded in a manner adverse to us, could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

MARKET PRESSURE TO REDUCE PRICES HAS HURT OUR BUSINESS AND THE PRESSURE IS LIKELY TO INCREASE.

Historically, the market has demanded increasingly lower prices for our products and we expect downward pressure on the prices of our products to continue and increase. Our products are relatively expensive for the consumer electronics and the small office or home office markets. For example, customers who purchase one of our modems must usually also purchase an Ethernet adaptor. Market

acceptance of our products, and our future success, will depend in significant part on reductions in the unit cost of our client modems. Sprint and other large-scale customers have increased the downward pressure on our prices. Our ability to reduce our prices has been limited by a number of factors, including our reliance on a single manufacturer of our modems and on single-sources for certain components of our products. One of the principal objectives of our research and development efforts has been to reduce the cost of our products through design and engineering changes. We have no assurance that we will be able to redesign our products to achieve substantial cost reductions or that we will otherwise be able to reduce our manufacturing and other costs, or that any reductions in cost will be sufficient to improve our gross margins, which have historically been negative and which must substantially improve in order for us to operate profitably.

WE RELY ON A SINGLE MANUFACTURER FOR OUR END-USER PRODUCTS AND ON SINGLE-SOURCE COMPONENTS, AND SOME OF THE COMPONENTS ARE BECOMING OBSOLETE.

OUR LONG SALES CYCLE MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR US TO FORECAST REVENUES, REQUIRES US TO INCUR HIGH SALES COSTS AND AGGRAVATES FLUCTUATIONS IN QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS. OUR SALES CYCLE MAY GET LONGER.

The sale of our products typically involves a great deal of time and expense. Customers usually want to engage in significant technical evaluation before making a purchase commitment. There are often delays associated with our customers' internal procedures to approve the large capital expenditures that are typically involved in purchasing our products. This makes it difficult for us to predict revenue. In addition, since we incur sales costs before we make a sale or recognize related

revenues, the length and uncertainty of our sales cycle increases the volatility of our operating results because we may have high costs without offsetting revenues.

Over the last year, the marketplace has consolidated so that our principal customers and potential customers are large service providers including telecommunications companies. This consolidation has greatly increased our selling expenses and lengthened our sales cycle.

INTERNATIONAL SALES COULD INVOLVE GREATER RISKS.

Although we currently sell our products primarily in the United States and Canada, we are pursuing opportunities in other countries and we believe that international sales may represent an increasingly greater proportion of our sales in the future. In 2000, international sales accounted for 24% of our gross sales, compared to 5% in 1999. To the extent that we sell our products internationally, such sales will be subject to a number of risks, including longer payment cycles, export and import restrictions, foreign regulatory requirements, greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection, potentially adverse tax consequences, currency fluctuations, political and economic instability and reduced intellectual property protection. To increase our international coverage we rely on value added resellers ("VARs") or integrators. These VARs may not remain exclusive Hybrid distributors and will attempt rather to meet the needs of their customers. They also compete with each other in some areas so it may be difficult for Hybrid to protect its international distribution channels. In addition, the frequency spectrum and amount of spectrum available internationally varies from country to country. We will be dependent on our VARs to develop compliant transceivers and transmitters, which may slow deployment in some international markets.

WE DEPEND ON KEY PERSONNEL AND HIRING AND RETAINING QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES IS DIFFICULT.

Our success depends in significant part upon the continued services of our key technical, sales and management personnel. Any officer or employee can terminate his or her relationship with us at any time. Our future success will also depend on our ability to attract, train, retain and motivate highly qualified technical, marketing, sales and management personnel. We are in an extremely tight labor market, and competition for such personnel is intense. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain key personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of our key personnel or our failure to attract additional qualified personnel could prevent us from meeting our product development goals and could have an extremely adverse effect on our business.

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws in addition to contractual restrictions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. We cannot assure that our patents will cover all the aspects of our technology that require patent protection or that our patents will not be challenged or invalidated, or that the claims allowed in our patents will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage to us. We have initiated one patent infringement lawsuit to enforce our patent rights, and it resulted in a settlement in which we granted licenses to the defendants containing certain terms that are in some respects favorable for them, including a right of first refusal to purchase our patents that we granted to one defendant (Com21, Inc.) in the event that in the future we propose to sell our patents (separately or together with our other assets) to any third party. We do not know whether we will bring litigation in the future in an effort to assert our patent rights, or whether other companies will bring litigation challenging our patents. Any such litigation could be time consuming and costly and could result in our patents being held invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, even if the patents are upheld or are not challenged, third parties might be able to develop other technologies or products without infringing any such patents.

We have entered into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, and we enter into non-disclosure agreements with certain of our suppliers, distributors, and customers, in order to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. There can be no assurance that these contractual arrangements or the other steps we take to protect our intellectual property will prove sufficient to prevent misappropriation of our technology or deter independent third-party development of similar technologies. The laws of certain foreign countries may not protect our products or intellectual property rights to the same extent, as do the laws of the United States.

We have in the past received, and may in the future receive, notices from certain persons claiming that our products, software or asserted proprietary rights infringe the proprietary rights of such persons. We expect that developers of wireless and cable modems will be increasingly subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our market grows. While we are not currently subject to any such claim, any future claim, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements might not be available on terms acceptable to us if at all.

In the future, we may also file lawsuits to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation, whether successful or not, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management resources. As indicated above, we were engaged during 1998 in an infringement lawsuit that we brought against two alleged infringers. In 1999, in order to stop the diversion of resources caused by the litigation, we entered into a settlement pursuant to which the defendants obtained licenses to our products on terms that in certain respects were favorable to the defendants. Nonetheless, we may find it necessary to institute further infringement litigation in the future.

DEFECTS IN OUR PRODUCTS COULD CAUSE PRODUCT RETURNS AND PRODUCT LIABILITY.

Products as complex as ours frequently contain undetected errors, defects or failures, especially when first introduced or when new versions are released. In the past, such errors have occurred in our products and there can be no assurance that errors will not be found in our current and future products. The occurrence of such errors, defects or failures could result in product returns and other losses. They could also result in the loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.

We are subject to varying degrees of governmental, federal, state and local regulation. For instance, the jurisdiction of the FCC extends to high-speed Internet access products such as ours. The FCC has promulgated regulations that, among other things, prescribe the installation and equipment standards for communications systems. Furthermore, regulation of our customers may adversely affect our business.

The capacity of downstream spectrum in the MMDS band is not a problem for current deployments but the upstream constraints severely limit capacity. Our customers generally only have MDS 1 and 2 for the return. This gives 12 MHz bandwidth enhanced to 50 MHz if using ten sector return antennas. Any increase in this capacity or the deployment of more cells usually requires additional spectrum. Each of our customers has filed for two-way operation in the MMDS band for the end of year 2000 but the FCC has to approve their filings. Operators in nearby cities must co-operate and show their plans do not cause interference. Delays in approvals by the FCC to open up MMDS spectrum to permit flexible use for upstream and downstream paths may adversely affect our future growth. If the FCC changes its decision to open the MMDS spectrum for full utilization, the future growth of the wireless industry could be limited.

VOLATILITY OF OUR STOCK PRICE.

The factors referred to in this "Risk Factors" section tend to cause our operating results to vary substantially from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations have adversely affected the prices of our common stock in the past and may adversely affect such prices in the future.

Our common stock was delisted from the Nasdaq National Market and did not trade on Nasdaq between mid-June 1998 and July 6, 2000. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA

Independent Auditor's Report		31
Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999		32
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998		33
Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998		34
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998.		35
Notes to Financial Statements		36
Supplementary Financial Data:
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited). Two years ended December 31, 2000		54

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

The Stockholders and Board of Directors Hybrid Networks, Inc. San Jose, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Hybrid Networks, Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hybrid Networks, Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP Certified Public Accountants Orange, California February 16, 2001

HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands, except per share data)

				December 31,
				2000			1999
ASSETS
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents			$	1,878		$	13,394
	Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $200 in 2000 and 1999				7,699			1,138
	Inventories				7,303			3,755
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets				519			234
			Total current assets		17,399			18,521
Property and equipment, net					2,000			2,244
Intangibles and other assets					265			387
			Total assets	$	19,664		$	21,152
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
	Current portion of capital lease obligations				29			336
	Accounts payable				4,529			2,035
	Accrued liabilities and other				6,517			4,623
			Total current liabilities		11,075			6,994
Convertible debentures					5,500			23,827
Capital lease obligations, less current portion					—			29
Other long-term liabilities					132			122
			Total liabilities		16,707			30,972
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 6,8,9, and 10)
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
	Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value:
		Authorized: 5,000 shares;
		Issued and outstanding: no shares in 2000 or 1999			—			—
	Common stock, $.001 par value:
		Authorized: 100,000 shares;
		Issued and outstanding: 21,935 shares in 2000 and 11,481 shares in 1999			22			11
	Additional paid-in capital				125,899			75,823
	Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities				—			107
	Accumulated deficit				(122,964	)		(85,761	)
			Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		2,957			(9,820	)
			Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	19,664		$	21,152

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except per share data)

				Years Ended December 31,
				2000			1999			1998
Gross sales				$	29,924		$	13,423		$	12,418
Sales discounts					(7,129	)		(407	)		—
Net sales					22,795			13,016			12,418
Cost of sales					23,139			13,341			14,046
Gross loss					(344	)		(325	)		(1,628	)
Operating expenses:
	Research and development				6,715			4,191			7,771
	Sales and marketing				16,491			1,740			3,642
	General and administrative				11,625			7,660			8,933
	Asset impairment charge				—			—			1,250
	Write off of technology license				—			—			1,283
		Total operating expenses			34,831			13,591			22,879
			Loss from operations		(35,175	)		(13,916	)		(24,507	)
Interest income and other expense					(717	)		171			779
Interest expense					(1,311	)		(8,447	)		(897	)
			Net loss	$	(37,203	)	$	(22,192	)	$	(24,625	)
Basic and diluted loss per share				$	(2.03	)	$	(2.08	)	$	(2.37	)
Shares used in basic and diluted per share calculation					18,309			10,678			10,410

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (in thousands)

		Preferred Stock			Common Stock
								Additional Paid-in Capital		Comprehensive Income(loss)			Accumulated Deficit						Comprehensive Loss
		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount										Total
Balances, January 1, 1998		—	$	—	10,345	$	10	$	66,145	$	92		$	(38,944	)	$	27,303
	Exercise of common stock options	—		—	127		—		87		—			—			87
	Grant of stock bonus awards	—		—	1		—		5		—			—			5
	Charge due to acceleration of options	—		—	—		—		24		—			—			24
	Reclassification for gains included in net loss	—		—	—		—		—		(92	)		—			(92	)	$	(92	)
	Net loss	—		—	—		—		—		—			(24,625	)		(24,625	)		(24,625	)
Comprehensive loss		—		—	—		—		—		—			—			—		$	(24,717	)
Balances, December 31, 1998		—		—	10,473		10		66,261		—			(63,569	)		2,702
	Exercise of common stock options	—		—	251		—		345		—			—			345
	Stock issued for services	—		—	7		—		56		—			—			56
	Sales discount recognized on issuance of warrants to customers	—		—	—		—		407		—			—			407
	Compensation recognized on issuance of stock options	—		—	—		—		975		—			—			975
	Class action settlement stock issued	—		—	750		1		385		—			—			386
	Discount related to beneficial conversion of notes	—		—	—		—		7,394		—			—			7,394
	Unrealized gain on investments	—		—	—		—		—		107			—			107		$	107
	Net loss	—		—	—		—		—		—			(22,192	)		(22,192	)		(22,192	)
	Comprehensive loss	—		—	—		—		—		—			—			—		$	(22,085	)
Balances, December 31, 1999		—		—	11,481		11		75,823		107			(85,761	)		(9,820	)
	Exercise of common stock options	—		—	1,181		1		1,348		—			—			1,349
	Exercise of warrants	—		—	71		1				—			—			1
	Convertible debt conversion	—		—	6,691		7		19,930		—			—			19,937
	Stock Bonus	—		—	3		—		27		—			—			27
	Sales discount recognized on issuance of warrants to customer	—		—	—		—		20,800		—			—			20,800
	Compensation recognized on issuance of stock options	—		—	—		—		4,596		—			—			4,596
	Class action and other lawsuit settlement stock issued	—		—	2,508		2		3,301		—			—			3,303
	Discount related to beneficial conversion of notes	—		—	—		—		74		—			—			74
	Unrealized gain on investments	—		—	—		—		—		(107	)		—			(107	)	$	(107	)
	Net loss	—		—	—		—		—		—			(37,203	)		(37,203	)		(37,203	)
	Comprehensive loss	—		—	—		—		—		—			—			—		$	(37,310	)
Balances, December 31, 2000		—	$	—	21,935	$	22	$	125,899	$	—		$	(122,964	)	$	2,957

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands)

				Years Ended December 31,
				2000			1999			1998
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net loss			$	(37,203	)	$	(22,192	)	$	(24,625	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization			1,139			1,323			1,883
		Amortization of discount related to beneficial conversion feature			—			7,394			—
		Issuance of stock for settlement of litigation			2,000			—			—
		Asset impairment charge			—			—			1,250
		Provision for doubtful accounts			—			—			200
		Provision for excess and obsolete inventory			(862	)		529			1,691
		Compensation recognized upon issuance of stock and stock options			4,596			1,031			—
		Common stock issued to induce conversion of debenture			1,170			—			—
		Beneficial conversion of convertible debentures			149			—			—
		Sales discounts recognized on issuance of warrants to customers			20,800			407			—
		Stock bonus			27			—			5
		Charge for accelerated vesting of options			—			—			24
		Interest added to principal of convertible debentures			368			226			—
		Gain on available for sale of securities			(107	)		107			—
		Write off technology license			—			—			1,283
		Change in assets and liabilities:			—
			Restricted cash		—			515			(515	)
			Accounts receivable		(6,561	)		295			(505	)
			Inventories		(2,686	)		940			(645	)
			Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(270	)		630			(502	)
			Accounts payable		2,494			(28	)		(222	)
			Other long term liabilities		8			68			—
			Accrued liabilities and other		3,196			738			1,376
			Net cash used in operating activities		(11,742	)		(8,017	)		(19,302	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Purchase of property and equipment				(788	)		(21	)		(3,907	)
	Disposal of property and equipment				—			—			74
	Change in other assets				—			—			(74	)
	Purchase of short-term investments				—			—			(11,772	)
	Proceeds from disposal of short-term investments				—			—			12,665
			Net cash used in investing activities		(788	)		(21	)		(3,014	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Repayment of capital lease obligations				(335	)		(465	)		(478	)
	Net proceeds from issuance of common stock				1,349			345			87
	Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures and related common stock warrants				—			18,101			—
			Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,014			17,981			(391	)
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents					(11,516	)		9,943			(22,707	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period					13,394			3,451			26,158
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period				$	1,878		$	13,394		$	3,451
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Common stock issued to settle class action liability			$	1,303		$	386		$	—
	Property and equipment acquired under capital leases				—			—			280
	Common stock issued in conversion of convertible debt				18,694			—			—
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Interest paid				855			710			802
	Income taxes paid				—			—			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

HYBRID NETWORKS, INC NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. FORMATION AND BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY

The Company, which was incorporated in Delaware on June 6, 1990, is a broadband access equipment company that designs, develops, manufactures and markets wireless and cable systems that provide high-speed access to the Internet and corporate intranets for both businesses and consumers. The Company's products remove the bottleneck over the local connection to the end user which causes slow response time for those accessing bandwidth intensive information.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The Company was organized in 1990 and has had operating losses since then. The Company's accumulated deficit was $122,964,000 as of December 31, 2000, and $85,761,000 as of December 31, 1999. Although the Company has raised large sums of capital in the past, including over $35 million in net proceeds from its initial public offering in November 1997, and over $18 million from the issuance and sale of convertible debentures in September 1999, and in February 2001, the Company entered an agreement with a fund of the Palladin Group that provided the Company with an initial $7.5 million in cash, and may provide the Company up to an additional $7.5 million in the future, the Company is losing money at a rate that will require it to raise additional capital in the future.

The Company may seek additional financing during 2001 through debt, equity or equipment lease financing or through a combination of financing vehicles (including the possible exercise of warrants issued to Sprint Corporation ("Sprint") as discussed in Note 6). The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on obtaining additional financing to fund its current operations and, ultimately, generating sufficient revenues to obtain profitable operations. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts.

At December 31, 2000, the Company's liquidity consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $1,878,000 and working capital of $6,324,000. The Company's indebtedness consisted of $5.5 million in convertible debentures.. The Company believes that its cash balance, plus anticipated revenues from operations, and non-operating cash receipts will be sufficient to meet the Company's working capital and expenditure needs through the year 2001.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company's financial statements are based upon a number of significant estimates, including the estimated useful lives selected for property and equipment, accrued liabilities related to product warranties and litigation, and valuation allowances for accounts receivable, inventory and property and equipment. Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that these estimates will be further revised in the near term and such revisions could be material.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair values for financial instruments under SFAS No. 107 "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments," are determined at discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The fair value of available-for-sale securities is based on market prices for the securities and is equivalent to its carrying value. The fair values of capital leases and convertible debentures are based upon borrowing rates that are available to the Company for obligations with similar terms, collateral, and maturity. At December 31, 2000, the estimated fair value of these liabilities approximate their carrying values.

Business Risks and Credit Concentration

The Company sells its products primarily to broadband wireless system operators principally in North America. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does not require collateral. The Company also maintains allowances for potential losses on collectability of accounts receivable, as needed, and such losses have been within management's expectations.

The Company operates in the intensely competitive and rapidly changing communications industry which has been characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, and federal, state and local regulation which may impede the Company's penetration of certain markets.

The Company currently operates in one industry segment with one product line. The Company's future success depends upon its ability to develop, introduce, and market new products, its ability to obtain components from key suppliers, obtaining sufficient manufacturing capacity, and the success of the broadband access business. The Company may experience future fluctuations in operating results and declines in selling prices.

Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counter parties failed completely to perform as contracted. Concentrations of credit risk (whether on or off balance sheet) that arise from financial instruments exist for groups of customers or groups of counter parties when they have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly effected by changes in economic or other conditions. In accordance with SFAS No. 105, "Disclosure of Information about Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk and Financial Instruments with Concentrations of Credit Risk," financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consist of cash balances maintained in excess of federal depository insurance limits, investments in commercial paper (which are classified as cash equivalents), and accounts receivable, which have no collateral or security.

The Company derived 77% of its revenue in 2000 from two customers and this concentration represents a risk to the Company. If there were significant reductions in sales to these customers and should the Company be unable to replace this business with sales to alternative customers, there would be a negative impact on the Company.

In accordance with SFAS No. 105, disclosure is required of significant concentrations of credit risk from one or more counterparties for all financial instruments. The Company had accounts receivable from two customers at December 31, 2000 that together represented 98% of total accounts receivable. The inability to collect receivables from either one of these customers would have a significant negative impact on the Company.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investment instruments with a maturity at the time of purchase of three months or less. Instruments with a maturity at the time of purchase of greater than three months but less than one year from the date of purchase are included in short-term investments.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of two to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the lease term. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred. Material expenditures, which increase the life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated remaining useful life of the asset. The cost of fixed assets sold, or otherwise disposed of, and the related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the accounts, and any gains or losses are reflected in current operations.

Intangibles and Other Assets

At December 31, 2000 and 1999, intangibles and other assets included deferred financing costs relating to fees incurred in connection with the issuance of a senior convertible debenture in April 1997. The deferred financing costs are amortized over the five-year life of the debenture (see Note 6). Total accumulated amortization of deferred financing costs as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 was $320,000 and $213,000, respectively. At December 31, 1997, intangibles also included the value assigned to the purchase of certain technologies relating to a technology support and development agreement signed in November 1997. In connection with entering into the technology support and development agreement, the Company issued a five-year warrant to purchase 458,295 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.91 per share. The amount attributed to the value of the warrants was $2,200,000. The Company periodically assesses the recoverability of intangible assets by determining whether the amortization of the asset balance over the remaining life can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows and is recognized as a write down of the asset to a net realizable value. The unamortized value of the technologies of approximately $1,283,000 was charged to expense in the second quarter of 1998 as it was determined to be of no further value to the Company.

Revenue Recognition

did not charge separately. We recognized the revenue attributable to these software and technical support contracts over the three-year period. Other service revenue, primarily training and consulting, is generally recognized at the time the service is performed.

Product Development Costs

Costs related to research, design and development of products are charged to research and development expenses as incurred. Software development costs are included in research and development and are expensed as incurred. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86 (SFAS 86) requires the capitalization of certain software development costs from when technological feasibility is established, which the Company defines as completion of a working model and when the software is available for sale to the Company's customers. The capitalized cost is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated product life, or on the ratio of current revenues to total projected product revenues, whichever is greater. To date, the period between achieving technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been short and software development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any software development costs.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Company will disclose the impact of adopting the fair value accounting of employee stock options. Transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services have been accounted for using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS 123.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the difference are expected to reverse.

Computation of Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. All such securities or other contracts were anti-dilutive for all periods presented and, therefore, excluded from the computation of loss per share.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Effective January 1, 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 (SFAS 130), "Reporting Comprehensive Income." SFAS 130 requires that all items recognized under accounting standards as comprehensive income be reported in an annual financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other annual financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. Examples of items to be included in comprehensive income, which are excluded from net income (loss), include

foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gain/loss on available-for-sale securities. The Company has presented comprehensive income (loss) for each period presented within the Statement of Stockholder's Equity (Deficit).

New Accounting Pronouncements

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1999 and 1998 financial statements in order to conform to the 2000 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on the previously reported net loss.

4. INVENTORIES

Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):

	2000		1999
Raw materials	$	2,633	$	2,251
Work in progress		1,144		190
Finished goods		3,526		1,314
	$	7,303	$	3,755

At December 31, 2000 and 1999, finished goods inventory included $2,730,000 and $0, respectively, of equipment that had been shipped to customers but for such shipments the related revenue was deferred pending final customer acceptance.

The allowance for excess and obsolete inventory was $1,980,219 and $2,842,000 at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The provision for excess and obsolete inventory included in cost of sales was $235,000, $529,000 and $1,691,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively.

5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2000			1999
Machinery and equipment	$	3,828		$	3,059
Office furniture and fixtures		747			747
Leasehold improvements		1,922			1,914
		6,497			5,720
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(4,497	)		(3,476	)
	$	2,000		$	2,244

Furniture and equipment purchased under capital leases included in the above table total $681,000 and $1,687,000 less accumulated amortization of $391,000 and $1,422,000 as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $1,139,000, $1,215,000, and $1,233,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively.

Due to the under utilization of the Company's San Jose headquarters, the 1998 financial statements include a fourth quarter charge of $1,250,000 reflecting the impairment of leasehold improvements and office furniture and fixtures.

6. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

In 1997, the Company issued a senior convertible secured debenture in the amount of $5,500,000, bearing interest at 12% per annum, payable quarterly, and maturing on April 30, 2002. An arrangement fee of $500,000 was paid by the Company. If the Company issues any shares (with certain exceptions for employee stock options and the like) for consideration less than the current conversion price, any such issuance would be subject to certain "weighted average" antidilution provisions.

The debenture is collateralized by substantially all of the Company's assets. The Company is prohibited from making plant or fixed capital expenditures in excess of $5,500,000 and $11,000,000 during the 12 months ending March 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively. Additionally, the Company is prohibited from, among other things, declaring dividends, retiring any subordinated debt other than in accordance with the debenture's terms, or distributing its assets to any stockholder as long as the debenture remains outstanding.

The Company's capital expenditures exceeded the maximum capital expenditures allowed for the 12 months ending March 31, 1999. The holder has waived this condition for the 12 month period ending March 31, 1999.

Issuances of Securities to Sprint Corporation and to Other Investors

In September 1999, the Company issued to Sprint Corporation ("Sprint") a convertible debenture in the face amount of $11 million due in 2009 and bearing interest at 4% per annum, compounded monthly (accrued interest is automatically added to principal quarterly)(the "Sprint Debenture"). The Sprint Debenture was convertible at any time after December 31, 1999, at Sprint's option, into 3,907,775 shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $2.85 per share (including accrued interest) (subject to adjustment). At any time on or after December 31, 2000, the Company could require the conversion of the Sprint Debenture. Concurrently with the issuance of the foregoing securities to Sprint, the Company issued to certain other investors for $7.1 million convertible debentures in the face amount of $7.1 million due in 2009 and bearing interest at 4% per annum,

compounded monthly (accrued interest is automatically added to principal quarterly). These debentures had substantially the same terms as the Sprint Debenture. Like the Sprint Debenture, these debentures were exercisable by the holders at any time after December 31, 1999, at their option, into 2,522,291 shares of the Company's common stock (subject to adjustment and including accrued interest). At any time on or after December 31, 2000, the Company could require the conversion of the debentures. The conversion price was $2.85. The investors that purchased the debentures were (i) partnerships associated with a firm of which a director of the Company is an executive partner; (ii) a partnership managed by a firm of which a former director (who was a director at the time of the investment) is a general partner; and (iii) an individual who is a director of the Company. During the quarter ended June 30, 2000, at the request of the Company, the holders agreed to convert the entire principal amounting to a face value of $18.1 million plus accrued interest through June 30, 2000, of $594,000, into 6,559,310 shares of common stock. Upon the conversion, we paid a premium as an inducement to the holders' equivalent to the interest that would have been added to the principal of the debentures for the third and fourth quarters of 2000, amounting to $375,750. The premium was paid in the form of additional shares of common stock calculated at the conversion price of $2.85 per share and was equivalent to 131,842 shares of common stock. The fair value of the stock was $8.87 per share at the time the premium was paid creating a beneficial conversion element valued at $1,170,000, which was recorded to interest expense at June 30, 2000.

In September 1999, at the time of Sprint's purchase of our debentures, we issued to Sprint, warrants to purchase up to $8.4 million of additional convertible debentures (subject to the shipment of up to $10 million of products and services pursuant to purchase orders) which debentures will be convertible into up to 2,946,622 shares of our common stock on the same terms and conditions as the convertible debentures referred to above. Ten percent of the warrants became exercisable on the shipment dates when aggregate shipments of products and services pursuant to purchase orders submitted by Sprint to the Company were at least $1 million. With each additional $1 million of shipments, Sprint was entitled to exercise an additional 10% of the warrants until the aggregate shipments were $10,000,000. In accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," transactions in equity instruments with non-employees for goods or services are accounted for using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS 123. SFAS 123 requires that in each period in which the warrants are earned, a non-cash charge will be recorded. The amount of such shipments during the year ended December 31, 2000 reached the $10,000,000 maximum and, based on the warrants' conversion ratio, this amount gave Sprint the right to receive 2,946,622 shares of the Company's common stock under the warrants, if exercised in full. The final value of this purchase right, using the Black-Scholes valuation model, was $20,800,000. Of this amount, $7,129,000 was recorded as a direct sales discount to offset recognized sales to Sprint. The balance of $13,671,000 was recorded as an operating expense of the Sales and Marketing department.

Assuming as of December 31, 2000, that Sprint would exercise all of its purchase warrants, it would own 7,013,068 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 28.2% of the 24,881,570 shares of our common stock that would then be outstanding (assuming no other security holders exercised their options, warrants or conversion privileges). On a fully diluted basis, assuming that as of December 31, 2000, all other security holders exercised their options, warrants and conversion privileges as well as Sprint, Sprint would own approximately 21.6% of the 32,431,063 fully diluted shares of our common stock that would then be outstanding. In addition, under the terms of our agreements with Sprint, Sprint has substantial rights with respect to our corporate governance. Two of our directors are Sprint designees, and we cannot issue any securities (with limited exceptions) or, in most cases, take any material corporate action without Sprint's approval. Sprint has other rights and privileges as well, including pre-emptive rights and a right of first refusal in the case of any proposed change of control transaction, which right of first refusal is assignable by Sprint to any third party.

The Company also issued to Sprint in September 1999 a $1,000 debenture due in 2009 which is convertible by Sprint at any time into a newly created Series J preferred stock of the Company. Under the purchase agreement for the debentures and under the terms of the Series J preferred stock, Sprint has the right to elect two directors to the Company's board of directors and Sprint's approval will be required for many types of decisions involving corporate governance (including veto rights over most material actions the Company might take, see Note 10 below). In addition, Sprint has certain rights of first refusal and preemptive rights in respect of certain issuance's of securities by the Company and other rights, including a right of first refusal with respect to any change of control agreement (as defined), which right of first refusal it can assign to third parties.

7. ACCRUED LIABILITIES AND OTHER

Accrued liabilities and other consists of the following (in thousands):

	2000		1999
Accrued payroll and related accruals	$	813	$	173
Accrued class action settlement and related legal expenses		775		2,946
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		3,916		797
Other liabilities		1,013		707
	$	6,517	$	4,623

8. COMMITMENTS

Lease Obligations

The Company entered into certain non-cancelable operating and capital lease commitments, which expire at various dates through April 2004. Capital leases bear interest at rates ranging from 7.6% to 10.1%. Future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable leases are as follows (in thousands):

	Capital Leases			Operating Leases
2001	$	30		$	899
2002					950
2003					976
2004					406
Thereafter
		30		$	3,231
Less amount representing interest		(1	)
		29
Less current portion		(29	)
	$	—

Rent expense for 2000, 1999 and 1998 was approximately $926,000, $1,064,000, and $955,000, respectively.

The Company's only long-term operating lease is for approximately 55,000 square feet of office, research and development, and manufacturing space in San Jose, CA. This sublease expires in April 2004.

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with two officers and retention agreements with two others. The agreements provide for aggregate annual salaries of $1,240,000 until the employee voluntarily terminates or renegotiates the agreement. The agreements may be canceled at any time for cause. If the Company terminates the agreements for reasons other than cause, aggregate severance due under the agreements would be $1,240,000.

9. CONTINGENCIES

Class Action Litigation

In June 1998, five class action lawsuits were filed in San Mateo County Superior Court, California against the Company, two of its directors, four former directors and two former officers. The lawsuits were brought on behalf of purchasers of the Company's common stock during the class period commencing November 12, 1997 (the date of the Company's initial public offering) and ending June 1, 1998. In July 1998, a sixth class action lawsuit was filed in the same court against the same defendants, although the class period was extended to June 18, 1998. All six lawsuits (the State Actions) also named as defendants the underwriters in the Company's initial public offering, but the underwriters have since been dismissed from the cases.

The complaints in the State Actions claimed that the Company and the other defendants violated the anti-fraud provisions of the California securities laws, alleging that the financial statements used in connection with the Company's initial public offering and the financial statements issued subsequently during the class period, as well as related statements made on behalf of the Company during the initial public offering and subsequently regarding the Company's past and prospective financial condition and results of operations, were false and misleading. The complaints also alleged that the Company and the other defendants made these misrepresentations in order to inflate the price of the Company's common stock for the initial public offering and during the class period. The Company and the other defendants denied the charges of wrongdoing.

In July and August 1998, two class action lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (the Federal Actions). Both of the Federal Actions were brought against the same defendants as the State Actions, except that the second Federal Action also named as a defendant Price Waterhouse Coopers, LLP (PWC), the Company's former independent accountants. (The underwriters in the Company's initial public offering were named as defendants in the first Federal Action lawsuit but were subsequently dismissed.) The class period for the first Federal Action is from November 12, 1997 to June 1, 1998, and the class period in the second Federal Action extends to June 17, 1998. The complaints in both Federal Actions claimed that the Company and the other defendants violated the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, on the basis of allegations that are similar to those made by the plaintiffs in the state class action lawsuits. The Company and the other defendants denied these charges of wrongdoing.

The Company and the other parties (other than PWC) to the State Actions and the Federal Actions reached an agreement to settle the lawsuits in March 1999, which agreement was approved by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in June 1999. In November 1999, the settlement of State Actions and the Federal Actions became final. The time to appeal from the court's approval of the settlement has expired. Under the settlement, (i) the Company's insurers paid $8.8 million on the behalf of the Company and the officer and director defendants, and (ii) the Company issued 3,045,000 shares of common stock to the plaintiffs and their counsel (750,000 shares were issued in November 1999, and 2,295,000 shares were issued in February 2000), representing 21.9% of the shares of the Company's common stock that were outstanding at the end of February 2000. As a result of the settlement and a related agreement between the Company and its insurers, the Company has paid, and will not be reimbursed by its insurers for, $1.2 million in attorneys fees and other

litigation expenses that would otherwise be covered by its insurance, and the Company does not have insurance coverage for the attorneys fees and expenses relating to the settlement that it incurs in the future.

SEC Investigation

In October 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission began a formal investigation of the Company and certain individuals with respect to the Company's 1997 financial statements and public disclosures. The Company produced documents in response to the Securities and Exchange Commission's subpoena and cooperated with the investigation. A number of current and former officers and employees and outside directors testified before the Securities and Exchange Commission's staff.

In November 1999, the SEC staff attorneys informed the Company in writing that the staff intended to file a civil injunctive action and seek civil monetary penalties against the Company for alleged violations of the federal securities laws.

On June 29, 2000, the SEC filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California a complaint against the Company and three former employees. On the same day, the court approved the Company's settlement with the SEC and entered judgment against the Company. The court's order enjoins the Company from violating the books and records and related provisions of the federal securities laws but does not include any monetary penalties or an injunction against the violation of the antifraud provisions of the securities laws. At December 31, 2000, the Company has accrued $775,000 in legal fees in connection with this settlement and related continuing matters. The Company does not believe, based on current information, that the order will have a material adverse impact on the Company's business or financial condition.

Pacific Monolithics Lawsuit

In March 1999, Pacific Monolithics, Inc. (which had filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and is suing as debtor-in-possession) filed a lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court, California against the Company, two of its directors, four former directors (one of whom was subsequently dismissed), a former officer and PWC. The lawsuit concerns an agreement that the Company entered into in March 1998 to acquire Pacific Monolithics through a merger, which acquisition was never consummated. The complaint alleged that the Company induced Pacific Monolithics to enter into the agreement by providing it with financial statements, and by making other representations concerning the Company's financial condition and results of operations, which were false and misleading, and further alleged that the Company wrongfully failed to consummate the acquisition. The complaint claimed the defendants committed breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, as well as fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The complaint sought compensatory and punitive damages according to proof, plus attorneys' fees and costs. In July 1999, the court granted the Company's motion to compel arbitration and to stay the lawsuit pending the outcome of the arbitration.

In October 1999, the plaintiff filed a demand for arbitration against the Company and the individual defendants with the San Francisco office of the American Arbitration Association. In the demand, the plaintiff alleged claims for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and negligent misrepresentation arising out of the proposed merger between the two companies. The demand sought unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, pre-judgement interest and attorneys' fees and costs. In November 1999, the Company and the individual defendants answered the demand by denying the claims and seeking an award of attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the agreement for the proposed merger. The arbitration hearing was scheduled to be held in September 2000.

On July 7, 2000, the Parties participated in a mediation of the dispute in San Jose, California before the Honorable (Ret.) Peter Stone of JAMS. The mediation resulted in a Stipulation for Settlement of the litigation. The Parties formalized the terms of settlement by entering a Settlement Agreement & Mutual General Release and Covenant Not to Sue (the "Agreement") dated August 21, 2000. The Company's former auditors also joined in the Agreement.

10. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Board of Directors has authorized the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock and the Board has the authority to issue the undesignated preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof. In September 1999, the Board authorized a Series J preferred stock with special voting rights; including the right to elect two members of the Board and veto rights over the following:

None of the Series J preferred stock was outstanding at December 31, 2000.

Initial Public Offering and Conversion of Preferred Stock

In November 1997, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission permitting the Company to sell shares of its common stock to the public. The offering was completed on November 12, 1997. In connection with the initial public offering, all outstanding shares of preferred stock were converted into shares of common stock.

Warrants

The Company has historically issued warrants in connection with its various rounds of financing, equipment lease lines, and transfers of technology. Warrants have been valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.

In connection with the issuance of Series G preferred stock in July 1996, and the 1996 equipment lease line, the Company issued warrants to purchase 58,021 and 5,802 shares of common stock, respectively, at $10.34 per share. During 2000, a warrant to purchase 58,021 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 22,039 shares of common stock. The remaining warrants are exercisable at any time and expire in August 2006.

In connection with the issuance of convertible promissory notes in June 1996, which were later converted into Series G preferred stock, the Company issued warrants to purchase 167,037 shares of common stock at $4.73 per share. In connection with the issuance of Series D preferred stock May 1995, the Company issued warrants, at $.001 per warrant, to purchase 592,593 shares of common stock at $4.73 per share. In December 1997, a warrant to purchase 132,225 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 99,850 shares of common stock. During 2000, a warrant to purchase 53,213 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 39,682 shares of common stock. The remaining warrants are exercisable at any time and expire in June 2001.

During 1996, the Company issued warrants, at $.001 per warrant, to purchase 76,245 shares of common stock at $4.73 per share. In connection with technology transferred and the 1995 equipment lease line, the Company issued warrants to purchase 169,259 and 8,466 shares of common stock, respectively, at $4.73 per share. During 1996, a warrant to purchase 169,259 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 91,921 shares of common stock. During 2000, a warrant to purchase 6,005 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 4,905 shares of common stock. The remaining warrants are exercisable at any time and 70,240 expire in June 2001 and 8,466 expire August of 2005.

In September 1997, the Company issued warrants to purchase 252,381 shares of common stock in connection with the convertible subordinated notes payable, at an exercise price of $10.91. In October 1997, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,659 shares of common stock in connection with obtaining a bank credit facility at an exercise price of $10.91. In November 1997, warrants to purchase 151,267 shares of common stock were exercised for a net exercise of 76,096 shares of common stock. During 2000, a warrant to purchase 18,599 shares was exercised for a net exercise of 4,818 shares

of common stock. These warrants are exercisable at any time and 82,515 expire in September 2002 and 2,659 expire in October 2002.

In November 1997, the Company issued a five year warrant to purchase 458,295 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.91 per share, in connection with a technology support and development arrangement.

In June 1999, the Company issued a five year warrant to purchase 210,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share to two customers in accordance with their volume purchase agreements. The fair value of the warrants of $407,000 was recorded as a discount on sales.

In September 1999, the Company issued to Sprint Corporation warrants to purchase $8.4 million of convertible debentures, as described in Note 6 of the Notes to Financial Statements. These debentures are convertible to 2,946,622 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.85 per share. The fair value of these warrants amounted to $20,800,000. Of this amount, $7,129,000 was recorded as a direct sales discount and the balance of $13,671,000 was recorded as an operating expense of the Sales and Marketing department. Substantially all of the warrants are subject to net exercise provisions. The Company has reserved shares for the exercise of all the warrants.

A summary of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2000 follows:

Number Outstanding	Exercise Price		Expiration Date
644,411	$	4.73	June 2001
458,295		10.91	November 2002
82,515		10.91	September 2002
2,659		10.91	October 2002
2,946,622		2.85	September 2004
210,000		0.50	June 2005
8,466		4.73	August 2005
5,802		10.34	August 2006
4,358,770

Stock Option Plans

In January 1999, the Company adopted a 1999 Officer Stock Option Plan and reserved 1,000,000 shares for issuance to officers of the Company or of a parent or subsidiary of the Company. In May 1999, the Company adopted a 1999 Stock Option Plan and, as amended in August 1999 and October 1999, reserved 4,000,000 shares for issuance to employees (including officers and directors who are also employees) or consultants of the Company or of a parent or subsidiary of the Company who meet the suitability standards set forth by this plan. The 1999 Officer Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Stock Option Plan will terminate ten years from the effective date or, if earlier, the date of stockholder approval of termination.

In September 1997, the Company adopted the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan and reserved a total of 1,750,000 shares for issuance to employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors, and advisors. The number of shares outstanding will increase automatically by 5% of the outstanding shares each year unless waived by the Board of Directors. In 1999, the Company increased the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan by 523,501 shares. The 1997 Equity Incentive Plan expires in September 2007. Also in September 1997, the Company adopted the 1997 Directors' Stock Option Plan under which 100,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance. The Directors' Plan provides for the grant of non statutory stock options to non-employee directors of the Company and expires in September 2007.

In December 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan and reserved 185,185 shares of common stock for issuance to employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors and advisors. In June 1997, the Company increased the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan by 222,222. The 1996 Equity Incentive Plan expires in December 2006.

In December 1995, the Company adopted the Executive Officer Incentive Plan and reserved 370,370 shares of common stock for issuance to the Company's chief executive officer and other senior executive officers. In 1996 and 1997, the Company increased the number of shares reserved under this plan by 129,630 and 62,963, respectively. In the event of a merger, consolidation, liquidation or similar change of control transaction as a result of which the participants' responsibilities and position with the Company are materially diminished, options granted under this plan become fully exercisable and remain so for one year thereafter. This plan will expire in December 2005.

In October 1993, the Company adopted the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan, and reserved 185,185 shares of common stock for issuance to employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. In 1995, 1996 and 1997, the Company increased the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan by 351,851, 425,925 and 66,340 shares, respectively. The 1993 Equity Incentive Plan expires in October 2003.

Under all of the plans, the exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant (not less than 110% of fair market value if the option is granted to a 10% stockholder). Under all of the plans other than the 1999 Stock Option Plan, nonqualified stock options may not be granted at less than 85% of fair market value on the date of grant. Options and stock awards generally vest 12.5% six months from date of grant and 2.0833% per month thereafter; although certain options vest over a shorter period of time, and the vesting of certain options accelerates in certain circumstances. Stock options generally expire three months after termination of employment and five years from date of grant, subject to exceptions in certain cases.

Activity under the plans is set forth below (in thousands, except per share data):

		Shares Available		Options Outstanding		Value of Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balances, January 1, 1998		2,024		1,926			5,885			3.06
	Options granted	(1,445	)	1,445			4,527			3.13
	Stock bonus award	(1	)	—			—			—
	Options canceled	511		(509	)		(1,871	)		3.66
	Options exercised			(127	)		(87	)		0.70
Balances, December 31, 1998		1,089		2,735			8,454			3.09
	Additional shares reserved	5,524
	Options granted	(4,075	)	4,075			9,015			2.21
	Options canceled	1,664		(1,664	)		(4,388	)		2.64
	Options exercised			(251	)		(357	)		1.42
Balances, December 31, 1999		4,202		4,895		$	12,724		$	2.60
	Additional shares reserved
	Options granted	(2,442	)	2,442			30,319			12.42
	Options canceled	1,086		(1,085	)		(6,365	)		5.86
	Options exercised			(1,181	)		(11,842	)		10.04
Balances, December 31, 2000		2,846		5,071			24,836		$	4.90

For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, the weighted average fair value of options granted was $12.25, $2.04, and $2.34 per share, respectively.

As of December 31, 2000, the stock options outstanding were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$0.50 to $0.54	1,037	5.74	$	0.50	611	$	0.50
$1.08 to $2.19	397	3.02		2.14	175		2.08
$3.63 to $5.13	1,111	3.75		3.74	371		3.86
$5.31 to $8.78	653	5.29		7.35	195		8.31
$9.00 to $11.25	528	4.51		9.99	20		10.61
$12.19 to 19.75	1,345	4.17		16.60	281		17.03
	5,071	4.49	$	7.48	1,653	$	5.27

As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, options to purchase 1,658,000 and 917,000 shares were exercisable at an average weighted exercise price of $1.87 and $2.56 per share, respectively.

The Company has elected to continue to follow the provisions of APB 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," for financial reporting purposes and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123. Compensation cost has been recognized for the Company's stock option plans under APB 25 where options were granted to employees at an exercise price, which is below market value at the date of grant. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards in years ended 2000, 1999, and 1998 consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per share for 2000, 1999, and 1998 would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2000			1999			1998
Net loss as reported	$	(37,203	)	$	(22,192	)	$	(24,625	)
Net loss—pro forma	$	(42,857	)	$	(23,061	)	$	(25,109	)
Net loss per share—as reported	$	(2.03	)	$	(2.08	)	$	(2.37	)
Net loss per share—pro forma	$	(2.34	)	$	(2.16	)	$	(2.41	)

The above pro forma disclosures are not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net income or loss for future years.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123, the fair value of each option is estimated using the following weighted average assumptions for grants during 2000, 1999, and 1998: dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 0% for options issued prior to the Company's Initial Public Offering, 113% in 1998, 117% in 1999, and 124.7% in 2000, risk-free interest rates at the date of grant, and an expected term of four years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In September 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under this plan, employees of the Company can purchase common stock through payroll

deductions. A total of 225,000 shares have been reserved for issuance under this plan. As of December 31, 2000, no shares had been purchased and all employees have withdrawn from the plan.

11. INCOME TAXES

Provision for income taxes for each of the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998 was $0.

Total income tax benefit differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rates to pre-tax income as follows:

		For the Years Ended
		2000		1999		1998
Total benefit computed by applying the U.S. statutory rate		-34.00	%	-34.00	%	-34.00	%
	Permanent differences	1.08	%	11.40	%	0.10	%
	Change in valuation allowance	32.92	%	22.60	%	33.90	%
		0	%	0	%	0	%

Temporary differences which gave rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets are as follows (in thousands):

		December 31,
		2000			1999
Current deferred assets:
	Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	80		$	80
	Inventory reserves		789			1,132
	UNICAP		666			644
	Unearned revenue		1,552			302
	Accrued liabilities		1,022			1,443
	Book compensation for stock options		9,977			417
	Total current deferred assets		14,086			4,018
	Valuation allowance		(14,086	)		(4,018	)
		$	—		$	—
Long-term deferred assets:
	Net operating loss carryforwards	$	21,006		$	16,946
	Capitalized research expenditures		7,775			7,146
	Tax credit carryforwards		2,884			2,524
	Depreciation and amortization		843			679
Total long-term deferred assets			32,508			27,295
Valuation allowance			(32,508	)		(27,295	)
		$	—		$	—

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance must be established for a deferred tax asset if it is uncertain that a tax benefit may be realized from the asset in the future. Management believes that, based on a number of factors, the available objective evidence creates sufficient uncertainty regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets such that a full valuation allowance has been recorded. These factors include the Company's history of losses, recent increases in expense levels, the fact that the market in which the Company competes is intensely competitive and characterized by rapidly changing technology, the lack of carryback capacity to realize deferred tax assets, and the uncertainty regarding market acceptance of the Company's products. The

Company will continue to assess the realizability of the deferred tax assets in future periods. The valuation allowance increased by $15,281,000 and $3,721,000 in 2000 and 1999, respectively. The Company had federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $56,046,000 and $22,060,000, respectively, as of December 31, 2000 available to offset future regular and alternative minimum taxable income. The Company's net operating loss carry forwards expire in 2001 through 2020 if not utilized.

In addition, at December 31, 2000, the Company had the following available credits to offset future tax liabilities:

	Reporting		Dates
Federal research and development credit	$	1,729,000	2007-2015
State research and development credit		1,016,000	None
State manufacturing investment credit		140,000	2002-2008

The Company's net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards may be subject to limitation in the event of ownership changes, as defined by tax laws.

12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the "Plan"), which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Plan covers essentially all employees. Eligible employees may make voluntary contributions to the Plan up to 15% of their annual compensation and the employer is allowed to make discretionary contributions. In 2000, 1999, 1998, the Company made no employer contributions.

13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company had net sales to stockholders of $482,000 for the year ended December 31, 1998.

See also Notes 6, 10, and 14 for transactions with Sprint.

14. BUSINESS SEGMENT AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS

The Company operates in a single industry segment and primarily sells its products to customers in the U.S. and Canada. Sales by product category during 2000 consist of 6% to cable customers and 94% to wireless customers. In 1999, 52% of sales were to cable customers and 48% to wireless customers. In 1998, 57% of sales were to cable customers and 43% to wireless customers. Sales to international customers represented 24%, 5%, and 0% of revenues in 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. International sales in any one geographic area other than Canada were insignificant.

Individual customers that comprise 10% or more of the Company's gross sales are as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2000		1999		1998
Sprint Corporation	54	%	28	%	—
RCN Corporation	—		31	%	25	%
Look Communications Inc.	23	%	—		—
Knology Holdings, Inc.	—		—		13	%

At December 31, 2000 and 1999, these customers accounted for $7,530,000 and $423,000, respectively, and 98% and 32%, respectively, of total accounts receivable.

15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 16, 2001 between the Halifax Fund, a fund managed by The Palladin Group, the Company issued and sold to Palladin on February 16, 2001 certain securities. The securities included (i) a $7.5 million principal amount 6% Convertible Debenture due 2003, which will be convertible into shares of the Company's common stock; (ii) a common stock Purchase Warrant to purchase 833,333 shares of common stock at $9.00 per share (subject to adjustment) which is exercisable at the election of Palladin, or at the election of the Company at a price which is the lower of (a) $9.00 and (b) 94% of the daily volume weighted average price; and (iii) an Adjustment Warrant. The Adjustment Warrant will be exercisable beginning on the 18th day following the date (referred to in this discussion as the Effective Date) that there is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission the registration statement that the Company is required to file with respect to the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the debentures and warrants. The Adjustment Warrant will only be exercisable, however, if the volume weighted average sale price for our common stock is not more than $7.2694. The aggregate number of shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of the Adjustment Warrant will be determined by dividing $8,625,000 by the Adjustment Price, as defined below, and then subtracting the sum of the number of shares of common stock previously issuable pursuant to the conversion of the debenture and the number issued upon any previous exercise of the Adjustment Warrant. The Adjustment Price is the average of the 15 lowest daily volume weighted average sale prices of the Company's common stock as reported on Nasdaq, not including the three lowest days, during the 65 trading day period following the Effective Date. The adjustment price will not be below $3.50. The adjustment warrant terminates three months after the end of the 65 trading day adjustment period. In consideration for such securities, Palladin paid an initial purchase price of $7,500,000. The Company granted to Palladin in the purchase agreement certain rights of first refusal, preemptive rights and other rights. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, Palladin and the Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 16, 2001.

SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA:

HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)

		Three Months Ended												Three Months Ended
		Mar. 31, 2000			June 30, 2000			Sept. 30, 2000			Dec. 31, 2000			Mar. 31, 1999			June 30, 1999			Sept. 30, 1999			Dec. 31, 1999
Net sales		$	1,677		$	2,747		$	5,475		$	12,896		$	4,123		$	3,004		$	3,319		$	2,570
Gross profit (loss)			(189	)		(1,558	)		992			411			(141	)		(1,345	)		259			902
Income (loss) from continuing operations			(7,711	)		(8,994	)		(12,823	)		(5,647	)		(3,050	)		(4,282	)		(2,663	)	$	(3,921	)
	Net (loss)	$	(7,963	)	$	(10,667	)	$	(12,939	)	$	(5,634	)	$	(3,253	)	$	(4,489	)	$	(4,663	)	$	(9,787	)
Earnings per share:
Basic:		$	(0.57	)	$	(0.73	)	$	(0.61	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.44	)	$	(0.88	)
	Net (loss)	$	(0.57	)	$	(0.73	)	$	(0.61	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.44	)	$	(0.88	)
Diluted:		$	(0.57	)	$	(0.73	)	$	(0.61	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.44	)	$	(0.88	)
Net (loss)		$	(0.57	)	$	(0.73	)	$	(0.61	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.44	)	$	(0.88	)

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY.

The information required by Item 10 regarding our directors is incorporated by reference to the information under the caption "Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors" in Company's definitive Proxy Statement for the Company's annual stockholders' meeting in 2001 (the "Proxy Statement") which Hybrid will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the calendar year covered by this report.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by Item 11 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to the information contained in the section captioned "Executive Compensation" in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The information regarding this item is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Information with respect to this item is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Proxy Statement.

PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

			Page No.
(a)		Documents filed as part of this Report:
	1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. See the Index to Financial Statements at Item 8 of this Report	30
	2.	FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. Schedules not listed below have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required or the information required to be set forth in those schedules is included in the financial statements or related notes.
		Schedule II—Valuation and qualifying accounts	61
	3.	EXHIBITS. The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report on Form 10-K:

		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.	Exhibit	Form	File No.	Filing Date	Exhibit No.	Filed Herewith
3.01	Registrant's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	3.03
3.02	Certificate of Designations of Series J Non-Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant.	8-K	000-23289	09-24-99	3.1
3.03	Registrant's Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended on March 22, 2001					X
10.01	Amended and Restated Investors Rights Agreement dated as of September 18, 1997 between Registrant and certain investors, as amended October 13, 1997 and as amended November 6, 1997.	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.01
10.02	Registrant's 1993 Equity Incentive Plan.(2)	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.02
10.03	Registrant's 1996 Equity Incentive Plan.(2)	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.03
10.04	Registrant's Executive Officer Incentive Plan.(2)	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.04
10.05	Registrant's 1997 Equity Incentive Plan.(2)	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.05
10.06	Registrant's 1997 Directors Stock Option Plan.(2)	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.06
10.07	Registrant's 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.(2)	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.07
10.08	Registrant's 1999 Stock Option Plan.(2)	10-K	000-23289	03-24-00	10.08
10.09	Registrant's 1999 Officer Stock Option Plan.(2)	10-K	000-23289	03-24-00	10.09
10.10	Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into by Registrant with each of its directors and officers.(2)	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.08

10.12	Senior Secured Convertible $5.5 Million Debenture Purchase Agreement between Registrant and London Pacific Life & Annuity Company dated April 30, 1997 and related Senior Secured Convertible $5.5 Million Debenture Due 2002 and Security Agreement and Senior Secured Convertible $5.5 Million Debenture Due 2002.	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.12
10.15	Collaboration Agreement among Registrant, Sharp Corporation and Itochu Corporation dated November 25, 1996 and Addendum No. 1 thereto dated November 25, 1996.	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.15
10.16	Sales and Purchase Agreement between Registrant and Itochu Corporation dated January 10, 1997.(1)	S-1	333-36001	11-11-97	10.16
10.17	Stipulation of settlement, dated March 3, 1999 among the Registrant and lead counsel for the plaintiffs in class action litigation against the Registrant	10-K	000-23289	03-24-00	10.17
10.24	Sublease between the Registrant and Viking Freight, Inc. dated February 9, 1998.	S-4	333-52083	05-07-98	10.24
10.26	Employment Letter from the Registrant to Judson Goldsmith dated November 12, 1998.(2)	10-K	000-23289	06-14-99	10.26
10.27	Product Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and RCN Operating Services, Inc. dated June 30, 1997	10-K	000-23289	06-14-99	10.27
10.28	Securities Purchase Agreement between Sprint Corporation and the Registrant dated August 30, 1999.	8-K	000-23289	09-24-99	10.1
10.29	Warrant Agreement between Sprint Corporation and the Registrant dated as of September 9, 1999.	8-K	000-23289	09-24-99	10.2
10.30	Amendment to Warrant Agreement between Sprint Corporation and the Registrant dated as of April 21, 2000.					X
10.31	1999 Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as of September 9, 1999.	8-K	000-23289	9-24-99	10.3
10.32	Amendment to 1999 Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated as of February 28, 2001					X

10.33	Form of 4% Convertible Class A Debenture due 2009.	8-K	000-23289	09-24-99	10.4
10.34	Form of 4% Convertible Class B debenture due 2009.	8-K	000-23289	09-24-99	10.5
10.35	Securities Purchase Agreement among the Registrant and certain investors dated as of August 30, 1999.	8-K	000-23289	09-24-99	10.6
10.36	Form of 4% Convertible Debenture due 2009.	8-K	000-23289	09-24-99	10.7
10.37	Purchase of Equipment and Services Agreement between Sprint/United Management Company and the Registrant dated May 1, 2000.	8-K	000-23289	05-10-00	10.8
10.38	Amendment #1 to Purchase of Equipment and Services Agreement between Sprint/United Management Company and the Registrant effective as of December 22, 2000.					X
10.39	Amendment #2 to Purchase of Equipment and Services Agreement between Sprint/United Management Company and the Registrant effective as of December 22, 2000.					X
23.01	Consent of Independent Auditors					X

The following Current Reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company since September 30, 2000.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

March 30, 2001		HYBRID NETWORKS, INC.
		By:		/s/ MICHAEL D. GREENBAUM Michael D. Greenbaum Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
/s/ MICHAEL D. GREENBAUM Michael D. Greenbaum	Chief Executive Officer, Director	March 30, 2001
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER:
/s/ JUDSON GOLDSMITH Judson Goldsmith	Vice President, Finance Chief Financial Officer	March 30, 2001
ADDITIONAL DIRECTORS:
/s/ JAMES R. FLACH James R. Flach	Chairman, Board of Directors	March 30, 2001
/s/ A. ALLAN KURTZE A. Allan Kurtze	Director	March 30, 2001
/s/ PHILLIP J. KUSHNER Phillip J. Kushner	Director	March 30, 2001
/s/ GARY M. LAUDER Gary M. Lauder	Director	March 30, 2001
/s/ CAMERON M. REJALI Cameron M. Rejali	Director	March 30, 2001

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

The Stockholders and Board of Directors Hybrid Networks, Inc. San Jose, California

Our report on the financial statements of Hybrid Networks, Inc. is included on page 31 of this Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of such financial statements, we have also audited the related financial statement schedule listed in Item 14 (a) (2) of this Form 10-K.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be included therein.

/s/ HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP

Hein + Associates LLP Certified Public Accountants Orange, California February 16, 2001

HYBRID NETWORKS, INC. SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (IN THOUSANDS)

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

For the year ended:	Balance at Beginning of Period		Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses		Additions Charged to Other Accounts		Deductions		Balance at End of Period
December 31, 2000	$	200	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	200
December 31, 1999		200		—		—		—		200
December 31, 1998		—		200		—		—		200

INVENTORY RESERVES

For the year ended:	Balance at Beginning of Period		Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses		Additions Charged to Other Accounts		Deductions			Balance at End of Period
December 31, 2000	$	2,842	$	235	$	—	$	(1,097	)	$	1,980
December 31, 1999		3,135		529		—		(822	)		2,842
December 31, 1998		3,015		1,691		—		(1,571	)		3,135

QuickLinks

Filing Compare · HYBRID NETWORKS INC