UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark one)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 333-131626

DEX MEDIA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		20-4059762

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1001 Winstead Drive, Cary, N.C.		27513

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(919) 297-1600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former
Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No þ *

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:


Title of Class		Shares Outstanding at July 15, 2009

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		1,000

THE REGISTRANT IS A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF R.H. DONNELLEY CORPORATION. THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.


*		The Registrant is a voluntary filer and as such is not required to file reports by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”); however, the Registrant has voluntarily filed all Exchange Act reports for the preceding 12 months.

DEX MEDIA, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q


		PAGE
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008		5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2. Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations*		24

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk**		37

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		37

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		38

Item 1A. Risk Factors		38

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds***		41

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities***		41

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders***		41

Item 5. Other Information		41

Item 6. Exhibits		42

SIGNATURES		43
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1


*		Pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(a) of Form 10-Q: (i) the information called for by Item 2 of Part I, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations has been omitted and (ii) the registrant is providing a Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations.

**		Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(c) of Form 10-Q.

***		Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(b) of Form 10-Q.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item I. Financial Statements

Dex Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Debtor and Debtor-In-Possession as of May 28, 2009
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)


*(in thousands, except share data)*	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008

Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	97,237		$	112,362
Accounts receivable
Billed		158,317			188,090
Unbilled		438,301			461,750
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales claims		(29,316	)		(34,166	)

Net accounts receivable		567,302			615,674
Intercompany loan receivable		125,000			—
Due from parent, net		23,391			—
Deferred directory costs		105,478			107,392
Short-term deferred income taxes, net		6,526			25,225
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		27,840			52,452

Total current assets		952,774			913,105
Fixed assets and computer software, net		90,491			96,609
Other non-current assets		56,414			64,930
Intangible assets, net		7,319,755			7,505,200

Total assets	$	8,419,434		$	8,579,844


Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity

Current Liabilities Not Subject to Compromise
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	65,189		$	99,688
Due to parent, net		—			73,391
Accrued interest		1,793			69,513
Deferred directory revenues		612,583			679,983
Current portion of long-term debt		117,929			99,625

Total current liabilities not subject to compromise		797,494			1,022,200
Long-term debt		2,066,845			4,562,206
Deferred income taxes, net		1,041,687			1,017,445
Intercompany debt		—			300,000
Other non-current liabilities		87,777			184,402

Total liabilities not subject to compromise		3,993,803			7,086,253

Liabilities subject to compromise		2,954,661			—

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholder’s Equity
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		3,496,258			3,580,838
Accumulated deficit		(1,992,333	)		(2,040,807	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(32,955	)		(46,440	)

Total shareholder’s equity		1,470,970			1,493,591

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	8,419,434		$	8,579,844

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Dex Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Debtor and Debtor-In-Possession as of May 28, 2009
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008


Net revenues	$	342,043		$	400,817		$	704,815		$	807,615

Expenses:
Production and distribution expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)		48,716			53,527			101,061			115,141
Selling and support expenses		97,989			99,346			191,031			201,841
General and administrative expenses		15,571			12,243			31,075			25,233
Depreciation and amortization		99,259			84,367			198,627			168,591
Impairment charges		—			422,209			—			2,557,719

Total expenses		261,535			671,692			521,794			3,068,525

Curtailment gain, net		13,461			—			13,461			—


Operating income (loss)		93,969			(270,875	)		196,482			(2,260,910	)

Interest expense, net		(77,354	)		(104,692	)		(170,075	)		(194,499	)


Income (loss) before reorganization items, net and income taxes		16,615			(375,567	)		26,407			(2,455,409	)

Reorganization items, net		58,465			—			58,465			—


Income (loss) before income taxes		75,080			(375,567	)		84,872			(2,455,409	)

(Provision) benefit for income taxes		(32,123	)		128,719			(36,398	)		891,340


Net income (loss)	$	42,957		$	(246,848	)	$	48,474		$	(1,564,069	)


Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net income (loss)	$	42,957		$	(246,848	)	$	48,474		$	(1,564,069	)
Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax		(4,212	)		27,308			(3,884	)		9,140
Benefit plans adjustment, net of tax		17,368			(1	)		17,369			(1	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	56,113		$	(219,541	)	$	61,959		$	(1,554,930	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Dex Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Debtor and Debtor-In-Possession as of May 28, 2009
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)


	Six months ended June 30,
*(in thousands)*	2009			2008


Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	48,474		$	(1,564,069	)
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment charges		—			2,557,719
Loss on extinguishment of debt		—			2,142
Curtailment gain, net		(13,461	)		—
Depreciation and amortization		198,627			168,591
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)		36,318			(891,388	)
Provision for bad debts		49,632			41,597
Stock-based compensation expense		4,084			8,324
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps		1,784			13,007
Amortization of deferred financing costs		5,298			2,470
Amortization of debt fair value adjustment		(7,659	)		(8,620	)
Accretion on discount notes		(623	)		30,621
Other non-cash items, net		10,335			(4,378	)
Non-cash reorganization items		(86,822	)		—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable		(1,259	)		(93,472	)
Decrease in other assets		27,809			4,494
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		11,434			(24,712	)
Increase (decrease) in amounts due to parent		18,879			(32,413	)
(Decrease) increase in deferred directory revenues		(67,400	)		33,553
Decrease in other non-current liabilities		(53,759	)		(6,234	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		181,691			237,232

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Intercompany loan		(125,000	)		—
Additions to fixed assets and computer software		(6,729	)		(19,211	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(131,729	)		(19,211	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Credit facilities borrowings, net of costs		—			1,035,512
Credit facilities repayments		(153,915	)		(1,053,492	)
Revolver borrowings		187,000			304,400
Revolver repayments		(9,811	)		(327,450	)
(Decrease) increase in checks not yet presented for payment		(3,781	)		1,398
Contribution to parent		(84,580	)		(125,400	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(65,087	)		(165,032	)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(15,125	)		52,989
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		112,362			12,975

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	97,237		$	65,964


Supplemental Information:
Cash paid:
Interest, net	$	139,712		$	148,015
Income taxes, net	$	27		$	2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Dex Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Debtor and Debtor-In-Possession as of May 28, 2009
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(tabular amounts in thousands)

1. Business and Basis of Presentation

Dex Media, Inc. is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of R.H. Donnelley Corporation (“RHD” or “parent”). The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Dex Media, Inc. and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company,” “Dex Media,” “we,” “us” and “our”) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dex Media, Inc. and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances between Dex Media and its subsidiaries have been eliminated. The results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any subsequent period. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented have been included.

We are a leader in local search within the Dex States (defined below). Through our Dex^® Advantage, customers’ business information is collected and marketed through a single profile and distributed via a variety of local search products. The Dex Advantage spans multiple media platforms for local advertisers including print with the Dex directories, which we co-brand with Qwest, a recognizable brand in the industry, online and mobile devices with dexknows.com^®, voice-activated directory search at 1-800-Call-Dex™ and leading search engines and other online sites via DexNet™.

Dex Media is the exclusive publisher of the “official” yellow pages and white pages directories for Qwest Corporation, the local exchange carrier of Qwest Communications International Inc. (“Qwest”), in Colorado, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota and South Dakota (collectively, the “Dex East States”) and Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming (collectively, the “Dex West States” and together with the Dex East States, the “Dex States”). Dex Media East LLC (“Dex Media East”) operates the directory business in the Dex East States and Dex Media West LLC (“Dex Media West”) operates the directory business in the Dex West States.

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings and Plan of Reorganization

Filing of Voluntary Petitions in Chapter 11

On May 28, 2009 (the “Petition Date”), RHD, the Company and RHD’s other subsidiaries (the “RHD Entities”) filed voluntary petitions for Chapter 11 relief under Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) in order to consummate a balance sheet restructuring. The cases are being jointly administered under the caption In re: R.H. Donnelley, Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-11833 (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). Promptly after filing the Chapter 11 petitions, the Company began notifying all known current or potential creditors of the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases.

We intend to use the Chapter 11 Cases to consummate a balance sheet restructuring, resulting in a less leveraged capital structure that is better aligned with the ongoing cash flows of our business.

During the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company is operating its business as a debtor-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and the orders of the Bankruptcy Court. We expect to continue to operate in the normal course of business during the reorganization process. Unless otherwise authorized by the Bankruptcy Court, the Bankruptcy Code prohibits the Company from making payments to creditors on account of pre-petition claims. Vendors are, however, being paid for goods furnished and services provided after the Petition Date in the ordinary course of business. However, operating in bankruptcy imposes significant risks on our business and we cannot predict whether or when we will successfully emerge from bankruptcy.

Commencement of Chapter 11 Cases

As of the Petition Date, all pending litigation wherein the Company is named as a defendant is generally stayed by operation of the Bankruptcy Code and absent further order of the Bankruptcy Court, no party, subject to certain exceptions, may take any action, also subject to certain exceptions, to recover on pre-petition claims against the Company.

On the same day that the RHD Entities filed the voluntary petitions, the RHD Entities also filed a motion seeking procedural consolidation of the Chapter 11 Cases for ease of administration, which order was granted by the Bankruptcy Court on June 1, 2009. The Bankruptcy Court also granted certain other motions in substantially the manner requested seeking typical “first day” relief to ensure that we were able to transition into the Chapter 11 process with as little disruption to our business as possible and to enable our business to function in the ordinary course while the Chapter 11 Cases were pending. The most significant of these granted “first day” motions authorized us to (i) pay pre-petition wages and other benefits to our employees; (ii) honor pre-petition customer obligations and continue customer programs; (iii) pay certain pre-petition claims of shippers, warehouseman and other lien claimants; (iv) make payments to certain pre-petition vendors that were vital to our uninterrupted operations; (v) pay and set aside amounts to adequately assure payment to providers of utility service; (vi) pay certain pre-petition tax claims; (vii) pay certain pre-petition insurance claims; (viii) continue use of our existing cash management system and bank accounts and (ix) use cash collateral with the consent of our secured lenders.

As required by the Bankruptcy Code, the United States Trustee for the District of Delaware appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors on June 11, 2009. In addition, an unofficial ad hoc committee of note holders is represented in the Chapter 11 Cases.

The Company continues to generate positive operating cash flows. If this trend continues, debtor-in-possession financing is not likely to be required as a result of our Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. However, the Company has incurred and will continue to incur significant costs associated with reorganization. These costs are being expensed as incurred and are included in reorganization items, net on the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

Proposed Plan of Reorganization

On July 27, 2009, the RHD Entities filed a proposed joint plan of reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court (the “Plan”), together with a disclosure statement in respect of the Plan (the “Disclosure Statement”). A plan of reorganization sets forth the means for satisfying claims against and equity interests in the debtor. The consummation of a plan of reorganization is the principal objective of a Chapter 11 reorganization case.

Certain salient economic terms of the Plan, which are subject in all respects to the specific terms and definitions set forth in the Plan, include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) elimination of approximately $6.4 billion of the RHD Entities’ indebtedness, including the payment of $715.0 million of secured indebtedness, and $500.0 million of annual interest expense; (ii) payment to the pre-petition secured lenders of the RHD Entities of approximately $675.0 million of debt paydown, including $200.0 million paid down pre-petition, in addition to scheduled amortization and interest payments that are subject to future cash flows of the RHD Entities; (iii) the exchange of all pre-petition publicly issued unsecured note debt for (a) 100% of the reorganized RHD equity that is subject to dilution pursuant to a stock-based management incentive plan, which is expected to permit equity-based compensation in an amount of not less than 10% of the fully diluted RHD equity, if approved in accordance with the Plan and (b) in the case of the holders of the Dex Media West 8.5% Senior Notes due 2010 and 5.875% Senior Notes due 2011, $300.0 million of new seven-year RHD unsecured notes on a pro rata basis in addition to their share of the reorganized RHD equity; (iv) the obligations of the lenders under the R.H. Donnelley Inc. (“RHDI”) revolving credit facility (the “RHDI Revolver”) to make additional advances terminated on the Petition Date and the outstanding loans under the RHDI Revolver will be converted to a term loan with a maturity date of October 2014 and an interest rate of LIBOR plus 625 basis points (“bps”), subject to a reduction upon satisfaction of a specified financial covenant threshold, and the current RHDI term loans will be amended to extend the maturity date to October 2014 with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 625 bps, subject to a reduction upon satisfaction of a specified financial covenant threshold; (v) the obligations of the lenders under the Dex Media East revolving credit facility (“Dex Media East Revolver”) to make additional advances terminated on the Petition Date, and the outstanding loans under the Dex Media East Revolver will be converted to a term loan with a maturity date of October 2014 and an interest rate of LIBOR plus 250 bps, subject to reductions upon satisfaction of certain financial covenant thresholds, the current Dex Media East Term Loan A will be amended to extend the maturity date to October 2014 and increase the interest rate to LIBOR plus 250 bps, subject to reductions upon satisfaction of certain financial covenant thresholds, and the Dex Media East Term Loan B will be amended to increase the interest rate to LIBOR plus 250 bps, subject to reductions upon satisfaction of certain financial covenant thresholds; (vi) the obligations of the lenders under the Dex Media West revolving credit facility (“Dex Media West Revolver”) to make additional advances terminated on the Petition Date and the outstanding loans under the Dex Media West

Revolver will be converted to a term loan with a maturity date of October 2014 and an interest rate of LIBOR plus 450 bps, subject to reductions upon satisfaction of certain financial covenant thresholds, the current Dex Media West Term Loan A will be amended to extend the maturity date to October 2014 and increase the interest rate to LIBOR plus 450 bps, subject to reductions upon satisfaction of certain financial covenant thresholds, and the Dex Media West Term Loan B will be amended to increase the interest rate to LIBOR plus 450 bps, subject to reductions upon satisfaction of certain financial covenant thresholds; and (vii) enhancement of the collateral and guarantees of the Dex Media East, Dex Media West and RHDI secured debt. As of emergence, the RHD Entities’ proposed Plan would, if adopted in its present form, result in consolidated debt of approximately $3.4 billion, of which $3.1 billion would be secured.

On May 29, 2009, RHD announced that the RHD Entities had reached pre-petition agreements in principle with a substantial majority of its unsecured noteholders and a substantial majority of their pre-petition secured lenders on a restructuring plan. The terms of the RHD Entities’ restructuring plan are evidenced by (i) Support Agreements dated as of May 21, 2009 and executed by certain of the RHD Entities and lenders holding in excess of two-thirds in principal amount and one-half in number of claims under each of the RHDI, Dex Media East, and Dex Media West pre-petition credit facilities and (ii) the Restructuring Support Agreement dated as of May 28, 2009 executed by the RHD Entities and noteholders holding in excess of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the pre-petition unsecured note debt (together, the “Plan Support Agreements”). The Plan is consistent with the terms and conditions of the Plan Support Agreements and applicable related term sheets. The Plan Support Agreements, together with the applicable terms sheets, form the basis for the Plan. There can be no assurance, however, that the Plan will be approved by all requisite holders of claims or interests or by the Bankruptcy Court or that all conditions precedent to the implementation of the Plan will be satisfied. Each Plan Support Agreement is subject to certain material conditions. Moreover, each Plan Support Agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events, including if the Plan is not confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court by January 15, 2010.

Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The accompanying historical consolidated financial statements and interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets or to the amounts classified as liabilities or any other adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

The assessment of our ability to continue as a going concern was made by management considering, among other factors: (i) our Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on May 28, 2009; (ii) the current global credit and liquidity crisis; (iii) the significant negative impact on our operating results and cash flows from the overall downturn in the global economy and an increase in competition and more fragmentation in the local business search market; (iv) that certain of our credit ratings have been recently downgraded; and (v) that RHD’s common stock ceased trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on December 31, 2008 and is now traded over-the-counter on the Pink Sheets. These considerations are further reflected by our goodwill impairment charges of $2.6 billion and intangible asset impairment charges of $603.0 million recorded for the year ended December 31, 2008. In management’s view, these circumstances and events raise substantial doubt as to whether the Company will be able to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

Accounting Matters

The filing of the Chapter 11 petitions constituted an event of default under the indentures governing the Company’s senior notes, senior discount notes and senior subordinated notes (collectively the “notes in default”) and the debt obligations under those instruments became automatically and immediately due and payable, although any actions to enforce such payment obligations are automatically stayed under the applicable bankruptcy law. Based on the bankruptcy petitions, the notes in default are included in liabilities subject to compromise on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009.

The filing of the Chapter 11 petitions also constituted an event of default under RHDI’s, Dex Media West’s and Dex Media East’s credit facilities. However, based upon the Plan, these secured lenders would receive 100% principal recovery and scheduled amortization and interest subsequent to the filing of the Chapter 11 petitions. In addition, substantially all of the assets of Dex Media East and Dex Media West and their respective subsidiaries, including their equity interests, are pledged to secure the obligations under their respective credit facilities. The Company has determined that the fair value of the collateral securing these credit facilities exceeds the book value of such credit facilities, including accrued interest and interest rate swap liabilities associated with the credit facilities, and therefore, the credit facilities are excluded from liabilities subject to compromise on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009.

As a result of filing the Chapter 11 petitions, certain interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $500.0 million were terminated by the respective counterparties and, as such, are no longer deemed financial instruments to be remeasured at fair value under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 133”). As of June 30, 2009, these interest rate swaps have not been settled and, as such, a liability of $21.5 million is recognized in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009. In addition, as a result of filing the Chapter 11 petitions, Dex Media East interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $500.0 million at June 30, 2009, which includes $400.0 million that have been terminated and $100.0 million still outstanding, are no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows. Accordingly, cash flow hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 is no longer permitted.

For periods subsequent to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant’s Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code (“SOP 90-7”), has been applied in preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements. SOP 90-7 requires that the financial statements distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain expenses including professional fees, realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized from the reorganization and restructuring process will be classified as reorganization items on the condensed consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, liabilities are segregated between liabilities not subject to compromise and liabilities subject to compromise. Liabilities subject to compromise are reported at their pre-petition amounts or current unimpaired values, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not purport to reflect or provide for the consequences of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. In particular, the financial statements do not purport to show (i) as to assets, their realizable value on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy liabilities; (ii) as to pre-petition liabilities, the amounts that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the status and priority thereof; (iii) as to shareholders’ deficit accounts, the effects of any changes that may be made in the Company’s capitalization; or (iv) as to operations, the effects of any changes that may be made to the Company’s business.

Other Significant Financing Developments

On May 28, 2009 and in conjunction with the Plan, the Company repaid an aggregate of $122.4 million in principal on outstanding balances owed under the Dex Media East credit facility and Dex Media West credit facility. The repayments were made under each of the credit facilities as follows:


Description	Amount


Dex Media West
Term Loan A	$	6,971
Term Loan B		50,941
Revolver		4,826

Dex Media East
Term Loan A		34,176
Term Loan B		20,454
Revolver		4,985

Total repayment	$	122,353

On May 14, 2009, the Company exercised a 30-day grace period on $54.0 million in interest payments due on the following senior notes and senior discount notes:


Description	Amount


Dex Media, Inc.
8% Senior Notes due 2013	$	20,000
9% Senior Discount Notes due 2013.		33,744

Dex Media West
5.875% Senior Notes due 2011		256

Total interest payments	$	54,000

Exercising the grace period did not constitute an event of default under the bond indentures or any of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ other debt agreements. The Company did not make these interest payments prior to filing the Chapter 11 petitions.

On April 15, 2009, RHD exercised a 30-day grace period on $54.6 million in interest payments due on its 8.875% Series A-4 Senior Notes due 2017 (“Series A-4 Senior Notes”). As a result of exercising the 30-day grace period, certain existing interest rate swaps associated with the Dex Media East credit facility having a notional amount of $350.0 million were required to be settled on May 28, 2009. Cash settlement payments of $26.4 million were made during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 associated with these interest rate swaps.

As a result of the recent decline in certain of our credit ratings, an existing interest rate swap associated with the Dex Media West credit facility having a notional amount of $50.0 million was required to be settled on April 23, 2009. A cash settlement payment of $0.5 million was made during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 associated with this interest rate swap.

On February 13, 2009, the Company borrowed the unused portions under the Dex Media East Revolver and Dex Media West Revolver totaling $97.0 million and $90.0 million, respectively. The Company made the borrowings under the revolving credit facilities to preserve its financial flexibility in light of the continuing uncertainty in the global credit markets.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill

As a result of RHD’s acquisition of the Company on January 31, 2006 (the “RHD Merger”), certain intangible assets were identified in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141”) and recorded at their estimated fair values. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”), the fair values of the identifiable intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives in a manner that best reflects the economic benefit derived from such assets. Amortization expense was $92.8 million and $76.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $185.5 million and 153.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In connection with the impairment testing of RHD’s definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets at December 31, 2008, RHD evaluated the remaining useful lives of its intangible assets by considering, among other things, the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors, including the stability of the industry in which it operates, known technological advances, legislative actions that result in an uncertain or changing regulatory environment and expected changes in distribution channels. Based on this evaluation, the remaining useful lives of all directory services agreements associated with the RHD Merger were reduced to 33 years effective January 1, 2009 in order to better reflect the period these intangible assets are expected to contribute to RHD’s future cash flow. The increase in amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 is a direct result of reducing the remaining useful lives associated with these directory services agreements, partially offset by a reduction in amortization expense associated with a revision to the carrying values of our local and national customer relationships subsequent to impairment charges recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.

Annual amortization expense in 2009 is expected to increase by approximately $63.3 million as a result of the reduction of remaining useful lives associated with our directory services agreements and revision to the carrying values of our local and national customer relationships subsequent to the impairment charges during the fourth quarter of 2008.

As a result of the decline in the trading value of our debt and RHD’s debt and equity securities during the first and second quarters of 2008 and continuing negative industry and economic trends that have directly affected RHD’s and our business, RHD performed impairment tests of its goodwill, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”), respectively. RHD used estimates and assumptions in its impairment evaluations, including, but not limited to, projected future cash flows, revenue growth and customer attrition rates. Based upon RHD’s impairment test of its goodwill, RHD recognized goodwill impairment charges of $2.5 billion and $660.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively, for total goodwill impairment charges of $3.1 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company’s share of the impairment charges, based on a discounted cash flow analysis, was $2.1 billion and $422.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively, for total goodwill impairment charges of $2.6 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2008. As a result of these impairment charges, we have no recorded goodwill at December 31, 2008 or June 30, 2009. RHD’s testing results of its definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets indicated no impairment as of March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008.

If industry and economic conditions in RHD’s markets continue to deteriorate, resulting in further declines in advertising sales and operating results, and if the trading value of our debt and RHD’s debt and equity securities decline further, RHD will be required to assess the recoverability and useful lives of its long-lived assets and other intangible assets. This could result in additional impairment charges, a reduction of remaining useful lives and acceleration of amortization expense.

Interest Expense and Deferred Financing Costs

Contractual interest expense that would have appeared on the condensed consolidated statement of operations if not for the filing of the Chapter 11 petitions was $91.5 million and $180.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

Certain costs associated with the issuance of debt instruments are capitalized and included in other non-current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the related debt agreements. The bond outstanding method is used to amortize deferred financing costs relating to debt instruments with respect to which we make accelerated principal payments. Other deferred financing costs are amortized using the effective interest method. Amortization of deferred financing costs included in interest expense was $2.9 million and $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $5.3 million and $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 includes a non-cash charge of $5.1 million associated with the change in fair value of the Dex Media East interest rate swaps that were required to be settled and interest rate swaps no longer deemed financial instruments under SFAS No. 133 as a result of filing the Chapter 11 petitions. Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 also includes a non-cash charge of $2.0 million resulting from amounts previously charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these interest rate swaps. The amounts previously charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the Dex Media East interest rate swaps will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the interest rate swaps based on future interest payments, as it is not probable that those forecasted transactions will not occur.

As a result of the refinancing of the former Dex Media West credit facility on June 6, 2008, the existing interest rate swaps associated with this debt arrangement are no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows. Accordingly, cash flow hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 is no longer permitted. In addition, certain of these interest rate swaps were required to be settled or terminated during the second quarter of 2009 as noted above. The change in fair value of these interest rate swaps resulted in a reduction to interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 of $2.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 includes a non-cash charge of $15.0 million resulting from amounts previously charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these interest rate swaps, offset by a reduction to interest expense of $2.0 million resulting from the change in the fair value of these interest rate swaps since June 6, 2008.

In conjunction with the RHD Merger and as a result of purchase accounting required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), our debt was recorded at its fair value on January 31, 2006. We recognized an offset to interest expense in each period subsequent to the RHD Merger through May 28, 2009 for the amortization of the corresponding fair value adjustment. The offset to interest expense was $3.0 million and $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $7.7 million and $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The offset to interest expense was to be recognized over the life of the respective debt, however due to filing the Chapter 11 petitions, unamortized fair value adjustments at May 28, 2009 of $78.5 million were written-off and recognized as a reorganization item on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. See Note 3, “Reorganization Items, Net and Liabilities Subject to Compromise” for additional information.

Apart from business combinations, it is the Company’s policy to recognize losses incurred in conjunction with debt extinguishments as a component of interest expense. Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 includes the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $2.1 million associated with the refinancing of the former Dex Media West credit facility, which has been accounted for as an extinguishment of debt.

Advertising Expense

We recognize advertising expenses as incurred. These expenses include media, public relations, promotional and sponsorship costs and on-line advertising. Total advertising expense was $5.9 million and $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $10.3 million and $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Total advertising expense includes costs associated with traffic purchased and distributed to multiple advertiser landing pages of $2.7 million and $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $5.6 million and $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Approximately 85% of our advertising revenues are derived from the sale of advertising to local small- and medium-sized businesses. Most new advertisers and advertisers desiring to expand their advertising programs are subject to a credit review. We do not require collateral from our advertisers, although we do charge interest to advertisers that do not pay by specified due dates. The remaining approximately 15% of our advertising revenues are derived from the sale of advertising to national or large regional chains. Substantially all of the revenues derived through national accounts are serviced through certified marketing representatives (“CMRs”) from which we accept orders. We receive payment for the value of advertising placed in our directories, net of the CMR’s commission, directly from the CMR. While we are still exposed to credit risk, the amount of credit losses from these accounts has historically been less than our credit losses on local accounts because the advertisers, and in some cases, the CMRs tend to be larger companies with greater financial resources than local advertisers.

We continue to experience adverse bad debt trends attributable to economic challenges in our markets. Our bad debt expense represented approximately 7.7% and 7.0% of our net revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, as compared to 5.8% and 5.2% of our net revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

At June 30, 2009, we had an interest rate swap agreement with a major financial institution with a notional amount of $100.0 million. We are exposed to credit risk in the event that the counterparty to the agreement does not, or cannot, meet their obligation. The notional amount is used to measure interest to be paid or received and does not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss. Any loss would be limited to the amount that would have been received over the remaining life of the swap agreement. The counterparties to the swap agreements are major financial institutions with credit ratings of AA- or higher.

Stock-Based Awards

RHD and the Company account for stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123 (R)”). RHD allocates compensation expense to its subsidiaries, including the Company, consistent with the method it utilizes to allocate employee wages and benefits to its subsidiaries. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to stock-based awards granted under RHD’s various employee and non-employee stock incentive plans of $1.7 million and $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $4.1 million and $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. RHD did not grant any stock-based awards during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

Long-Term Incentive Program

On March 9, 2009, RHD’s Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) approved the 2009 Long-Term Incentive Program (the “2009 LTIP”) for the Company. The 2009 LTIP is a cash-based plan designed to provide long-term incentive compensation to participants based on the achievement of performance goals designated by the Committee pursuant to RHD’s 2005 Stock Award and Incentive Plan. The Committee administers the 2009 LTIP in its sole discretion and may, subject to certain exceptions, delegate some or all of its power and authority under the 2009 LTIP to the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of RHD. Participants in the 2009 LTIP consist of (i) such executive officers of RHD and its affiliates as the Committee in its sole discretion may select from time to time and (ii) such other employees of RHD and its subsidiaries and affiliates as the Chief Executive Officer in his sole discretion may select from time to time. The amount of each award under the 2009 LTIP will be paid in cash and is dependent upon the attainment of certain performance measures related to the amount of RHD’s cumulative

free cash flow for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 fiscal years (the “Performance Period”). Participants who are executive officers of RHD, and certain other participants designated by the Chief Executive Officer, are also eligible to receive a payment upon the achievement of a restructuring, reorganization and/or recapitalization relating to RHD’s outstanding indebtedness and liabilities (the “Specified Actions”) during the Performance Period. Payments will be made following the end of the Performance Period or the date of a Specified Action, as the case may be. Awards granted to executive officers under the 2009 LTIP (and to certain other participants designated by the Chief Executive Officer) will continue to be paid, subject to the applicable performance conditions, in the event the participant’s employment is terminated by the participant with Good Reason (as such term is defined in the 2009 LTIP), by RHD without Cause (as such term is defined in the 2009 LTIP) or as a result of the participant’s death or disability. Such payment will be made as if the participant had remained employed with RHD through the applicable payment date under the 2009 LTIP, subject to the achievement of the applicable performance conditions. If any participant’s employment with RHD is terminated under any other circumstances, any unpaid amount under the 2009 LTIP will be forfeited. These cash-based awards were granted to participants in April 2009. As a result, the Company recognized compensation expense related to the 2009 LTIP of $1.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximated their carrying value based on the short-term nature of these instruments. As a result of filing the Chapter 11 petitions and the Plan, we do not believe that it is meaningful to present the fair market value of our long-term debt at June 30, 2009 in Note 5, “Long-Term Debt.”

The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy, which gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets, is comprised of the following three levels:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 — Observable inputs, other than Level 1 inputs. Level 2 inputs would typically include quoted prices in markets that are not active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the measurement and unobservable.

At June 30, 2009, the Company has an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $100.0 million that continues to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the following table represents our assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009 and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements were included.


	Fair Value Measurements at
	June 30, 2009
Description	Using Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)

Derivatives — Liabilities	$	(3,555	)

In conjunction with the classification of our credit facilities, this interest rate swap liability is excluded from liabilities subject to compromise on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009, as both our credit facilities and interest rate swaps are fully collateralized.

Valuation Techniques

Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the liability rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The Company uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date.

Fair value for our derivative instruments was derived using pricing models. Pricing models take into account relevant observable market inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The pricing models used to determine fair value incorporate contract terms (including maturity) as well as other inputs including, but not limited to, interest rate yield curves and the creditworthiness of the counterparty. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the impact of our own credit rating is also considered when measuring the fair value of liabilities. Our credit rating could have a material impact on the fair value of our derivative instruments, our results of operations or financial condition in a particular reporting period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the impact of applying our credit rating in determining the fair value of our derivative instruments was a reduction to our interest rate swap liability of $0.2 million.

Many pricing models do not entail material subjectivity because the methodologies employed do not necessitate significant judgment, and the pricing inputs are observed from actively quoted markets, as is the case for our derivative instruments. The pricing models used by the Company are widely accepted by the financial services industry. As such and as noted above, our derivative instruments are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Fair Value Control Processes

The Company employs control processes to validate the fair value of its derivative instruments derived from the pricing models. These control processes are designed to assure that the values used for financial reporting are based on observable inputs wherever possible. In the event that observable inputs are not available, the control processes are designed to assure that the valuation approach utilized is appropriate and consistently applied and that the assumptions are reasonable.

In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Staff Position FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP No. 157-2”), which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis, to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company had elected the deferral option permitted by FSP No. 157-2 for its non-financial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in prior business combinations including intangible assets and goodwill. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP No. 157-2 effective January 1, 2009, resulting in no material impact to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and certain expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates and assumptions. Estimates and assumptions are used in the determination of recoverability of long-lived assets, sales allowances, allowances for doubtful accounts, depreciation and amortization, employee benefit plans expense, restructuring reserves, deferred income taxes, certain estimates pertaining to liabilities under FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN No. 48”), certain assumptions pertaining to RHD’s stock-based awards and certain estimates associated with liabilities classified as liabilities subject to compromise, among others.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”), the objective of which is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, SFAS No. 165 sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and as such, we adopted SFAS No. 165 as of June 30, 2009. See Note 12, “Subsequent Events’ for additional information.

We have reviewed other accounting pronouncements that were issued as of June 30, 2009, which the Company has not yet adopted, and do not believe that these pronouncements will have a material impact on our financial position or operating results.

3. Reorganization Items, Net and Liabilities Subject to Compromise

Reorganization Items, Net

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company has recorded $58.5 million of reorganization items on a separate line item on the condensed consolidated statement of operations in accordance with SOP 90-7. Reorganization items represent amounts that are directly associated with the process of reorganizing the business under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The following table displays the details of reorganization items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:


	Three and Six
	Months Ended June
	30, 2009

Write-off of fair value adjustments	$	(78,511	)
Write-off of net premiums / discounts on long-term debt		(8,311	)
Professional fees		28,357

Total reorganization items	$	(58,465	)

The write-off of unamortized fair value adjustments required by GAAP as a result of the RHD Merger of $78.5 million and unamortized net premiums / discounts of $8.3 million at May 28, 2009 relate to long-term debt classified as liabilities subject to compromise at June 30, 2009.

The Company has incurred professional fees of $28.4 million associated with filing the Chapter 11 petitions. Professional fees include financial, legal and valuation services directly associated with the reorganization process.

Liabilities Subject to Compromise

Liabilities subject to compromise refers to unsecured obligations that will be accounted for under a plan of reorganization. SOP 90-7 requires pre-petition liabilities, including those that became known after filing the Chapter 11 petitions, that are subject to compromise to be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. These liabilities represent the estimated amount expected to be resolved on known or potential claims through the Chapter 11 process, and remain subject to future adjustments from negotiated settlements, actions of the Bankruptcy Court and non-acceptance of certain executory contracts and unexpired leases. Liabilities subject to compromise also includes items that may be assumed under the plan of reorganization, and may be subsequently reclassified to liabilities not subject to compromise. The Company has classified all of its notes in default as liabilities subject to compromise. Liabilities subject to compromise also include certain pre-petition liabilities including accrued interest, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, intercompany liabilities, which includes $300.0 million of intercompany debt, tax related liabilities and lease related liabilities. The Company’s cash flow from operations was favorably impacted by the stay of payment related to accrued interest.

The table below identifies the principal categories of liabilities subject to compromise at June 30, 2009:


	June 30, 2009

Notes in default	$	2,405,227
Intercompany liabilities		419,576
Accrued interest		88,201
Lease related liabilities		23,132
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		17,391
Tax related liabilities		1,134

Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	2,954,661

4. Restructuring Charges

The table below shows the activity in our restructuring reserves for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.


Three months ended	2006 Restructuring			2007 Restructuring			2008 Restructuring			2009 Restructuring
June 30, 2009	Actions			Actions			Actions			Actions			Total

Balance at March 31, 2009	$	484		$	69		$	2,791		$	—		$	3,344
Additions to reserve charged to earnings		—			—			1,244			1,144			2,388
Payments		(50	)		(20	)		(2,113	)		(155	)		(2,338	)
Reclass to liabilities subject to compromise		(434	)		—			(1,669	)		(989	)		(3,092	)

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	—		$	49		$	253		$	—		$	302


Six months ended	2006 Restructuring			2007 Restructuring			2008 Restructuring			2009 Restructuring
June 30, 2009	Actions			Actions			Actions			Actions			Total

Balance at December 31, 2008	$	567		$	54		$	7,282		$	—		$	7,903
Additions to reserve charged to earnings		—			32			4,394			1,144			5,570
Payments		(133	)		(37	)		(9,754	)		(155	)		(10,079	)
Reclass to liabilities subject to compromise		(434	)		—			(1,669	)		(989	)		(3,092	)

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	—		$	49		$	253		$	—		$	302

During the second quarter of 2009, RHD initiated a restructuring plan that included vacating leased facilities (“2009 Restructuring Actions”). During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a restructuring charge to earnings associated with the 2009 Restructuring Actions of $1.1 million and made payments of $0.2 million. Remaining lease obligations of $1.0 million have been reclassed to liabilities subject to compromise on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009.

During the first quarter of 2009, RHD initiated a restructuring plan that included outside consulting services to assist with the evaluation of its capital structure, including various balance sheet restructuring alternatives. Professional fees of $1.4 million, which were previously charged to 2009 Restructuring Actions during the first quarter of 2009, have been reclassed to reorganization items, net on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

During the second quarter of 2008, RHD initiated a restructuring plan that included planned headcount reductions, consolidation of responsibilities and vacated leased facilities (“2008 Restructuring Actions”) that occurred during 2008 and will continue into 2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recognized a restructuring charge to earnings associated with the 2008 Restructuring Actions of $1.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively, and $4.4 million and $2.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Payments of $2.1 million and $0.7 million were made with respect to outside consulting services, severance, and vacated leased facilities during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $9.8 million and $0.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Remaining lease obligations of $1.7 million have been reclassed to liabilities subject to compromise on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, RHD initiated a restructuring plan that included planned headcount reductions and consolidation of responsibilities to be effectuated during 2008 (“2007 Restructuring Actions”). The Company did not recognize a restructuring charge to earnings associated with the 2007 Restructuring Actions during the three months ended June 30,2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized a restructuring charge to earnings associated with the 2007 Restructuring Actions of $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million and $0.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Severance payments of less than $0.1 million and $0.5 million associated with the 2007 Restructuring Actions were made during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and less than $0.1 million and $1.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

As a result of the RHD Merger, we completed a restructuring and vacated certain of our leased Dex Media facilities. The costs associated with these actions are shown in the table above under the caption “2006 Restructuring Actions.” No payments were made with respect to severance during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Payments made with respect to severance during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Payments made with respect to the vacated leased Dex Media facilities were less than $0.1 million and $0.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $0.1 million and $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Remaining lease obligations of $0.4 million have been reclassed to liabilities subject to compromise on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009.

Restructuring charges that are charged to earnings are included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

5. Long-Term Debt

The following table presents the carrying value of our long-term debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. As a result of filing the Chapter 11 petitions, unamortized fair value adjustments required by GAAP as a result of the RHD Merger of $78.5 million and unamortized net premiums / discounts of $8.3 million at May 28, 2009 were written-off and recognized as reorganization items on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Therefore the carrying value of our long-term debt at June 30, 2009 represents par value. The carrying value of our long-term debt at December 31, 2008 includes $86.2 million of unamortized fair value adjustments.


	Notes in Default		Credit Facilities

	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008


Dex Media, Inc.
8% Senior Notes due 2013	$	500,000	$	—	$	510,408
9% Senior Discount Notes due 2013		749,857		—		771,488

Dex Media East
Credit Facility		—		1,082,835		1,081,500

Dex Media West
Credit Facility		—		1,101,939		1,080,000
8.5% Senior Notes due 2010		385,000		—		393,883
5.875% Senior Notes due 2011		8,720		—		8,761
9.875% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013		761,650		—		815,791

Total Dex Media consolidated		2,405,227		2,184,774		4,661,831
Less current portion		—		117,929		99,625

Long-term debt subject to compromise	$	2,405,227		—		—

Long-term debt not subject to compromise			$	2,066,845	$	4,562,206

Credit Facilities

As described in Note 1, “Business and Basis of Presentation — Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings and Plan of Reorganization,” the Plan includes modifications to certain terms and conditions of the Company’s credit facilities, which are not reflected below.

At June 30, 2009, total outstanding debt under our credit facilities was $2,184.8 million, comprised of $1,082.8 million under the Dex Media East credit facility and $1,101.9 million under the Dex Media West credit facility.

Dex Media East

As of June 30, 2009, outstanding balances under the Dex Media East credit facility totaled $1,082.8 million, comprised of $614.2 million under Term Loan A, $376.6 million under Term Loan B and $92.0 million under the Dex Media East Revolver, exclusive of $2.6 million utilized under three standby letters of credit. All Term Loans require quarterly principal and interest payments. The Dex Media East Revolver and Term Loan A will mature in October 2013, and the Term Loan B will mature in October 2014. The weighted average interest rate of outstanding debt under the Dex Media East credit facility was 2.52% and 3.83% at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

Dex Media West

As of June 30, 2009, outstanding balances under the Dex Media West credit facility totaled $1,101.9 million, comprised of $119.9 million under Term Loan A, $896.8 million under Term Loan B and $85.2 million under the Dex Media West Revolver. The Dex Media West Revolver and Term Loan A will mature in October 2013 and the Term Loan B will mature in October 2014. All Term Loans require quarterly principal and interest payments. The weighted average interest rate of outstanding debt under the Dex Media West credit facility was 6.97% and 7.10% at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

6. Derivative Financial Instruments

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 amends SFAS No. 133 and requires enhanced disclosures of derivative instruments and hedging activities such as the fair value of derivative instruments and presentation of gains or losses in tabular format, as well as disclosures regarding credit risks and strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and, as such, the Company adopted the provisions of this standard on January 1, 2009. Although SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures, its adoption did not impact the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

As a result of filing the Chapter 11 petitions, the Company does not have any interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of June 30, 2009. The Company accounts for its derivative financial instruments and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FAS 133 and SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes and our derivative financial instruments are limited to interest rate swap agreements. Our variable rate debt exposes the Company to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. Management believes that it is prudent to mitigate the interest rate risk on a portion of its variable rate borrowings. Additionally, our credit facility requires that we maintain hedge agreements to provide a fixed rate on at least 33% of our indebtedness. To satisfy our objectives and requirements, the Company has entered into fixed interest rate swap agreements to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on variable rate debt. The Company has entered into the following interest rate swap that effectively converts approximately $100.0 million, or 5%, of the Company’s variable rate debt to fixed rate debt as of June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2009, approximately 48% of our total debt outstanding consists of variable rate debt, excluding the effect of our interest rate swaps. Including the effect of our interest rate swaps, total fixed rate debt comprised approximately 55% of our total debt portfolio as of June 30, 2009. Our interest rate swap matures on March 29, 2013.


Effective Dates	Notional Amount			Pay Rates			Maturity Dates

*(amounts in millions)*
March 31, 2008	$	100	⁽¹⁾		3.50	%	March 29, 2013

Total	$	100


(1)		Consists of one swap

The following table presents the fair value of our interest rate swap at June 30, 2009. The fair value of our interest rate swap is presented in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other non-current liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009. The following table also presents the (gain) loss recognized in interest expense from the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps and (gain) loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss from effective interest rate swaps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.


				(Gain) Loss Recognized in							(Gain) Loss Recognized
				Interest Expense							in Accumulated
				From the Change in Fair Value of							Other Comprehensive
				Interest Rate Swaps						Loss From Effective Interest Rate Swaps
	Fair Value
	Measurements			Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	at June 30, 2009			June 30, 2009			June 30, 2009				June 30, 2009			June 30, 2009


Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities	$	(2,532	)	$	12,247		$	9,226			$	11,368		$	12,050
Other Non-Current Liabilities		(1,023	)		(7,442	)		(7,442	)			(7,156	)		(8,166	)

Total Liabilities	$	(3,555	)	$	4,805		$	1,784			$	4,212		$	3,884

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company reclassified $11.9 million and $18.8 million, respectively, of hedging losses related to our interest rate swaps into earnings. As of June 30, 2009, $15.5 million of deferred losses, net of tax, on derivative instruments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months. Transactions and events are expected to occur over the next 12 months that will necessitate reclassifying these derivative losses to earnings as the hedged transactions occur.

Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, the Company receives variable interest based on three-month LIBOR and pays a weighted average fixed rate of 3.5%. The weighted average variable rate received on our interest rate swaps was 0.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. These periodic payments and receipts are recorded as interest expense.

On the day a derivative contract is executed, the Company may designate the derivative instrument as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid (cash flow hedge). For all hedging relationships, the Company formally documents the hedging relationship and its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, the hedging instrument, the item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed, and a description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged items.

All derivative financial instruments were recognized as either assets or liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets with measurement at fair value. On a quarterly basis, the fair values of the interest rate swaps were determined based on quoted market prices and, to the extent the swaps provided an effective hedge, the differences between the fair value and the book value of the swaps were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, a component of shareholder’s equity. For derivative financial instruments that were not designated or did not qualify as hedged transactions, the initial fair value, if any, and any subsequent gains or losses on the change in the fair value were reported in earnings as a component of interest expense. Any gains or losses related to the quarterly fair value adjustments were presented as a non-cash operating activity on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative or hedged item is expired, sold, terminated, exercised, or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. In situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the Company continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and recognizes any subsequent changes in its fair value in earnings as a component of interest expense. Any amounts previously recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss will be amortized to interest expense in the same period(s) in which the interest expense of the underlying debt impacts earnings.

By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the possible failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes the Company, which creates credit risk for the Company. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, the Company owes the counterparty and, therefore, it is not subject to credit risk. The Company minimizes the credit risk in derivative financial instruments by entering into transactions with major financial institutions with credit ratings of AA- or higher.

Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.

See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Fair Value of Financial Instruments” for additional information regarding our interest rate swaps.

7. Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on income before income taxes of 42.8% and 42.9% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, compares to an effective tax rate of 34.3% and 36.3% on loss before income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The change in the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 is primarily due to estimates of non-deductible reorganization costs as well as the tax consequences of goodwill impairment charges during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.

8. Benefit Plans

Upon ratification of the new collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of America (“IBEW”) on June 15, 2009 and in conjunction with the comprehensive redesign of RHD’s and the Company’s employee retirement savings and pension plans approved by the Compensation & Benefits Committee of RHD’s Board of Directors on October 21, 2008, the following plan changes have been approved for IBEW employees:

	•		Effective as of December 31, 2009, the Company will freeze the Dex Media, Inc. Pension Plan covering IBEW employees. In connection with the freeze, all pension plan benefit accruals for IBEW plan participants will cease as of December 31, 2009, however, all plan balances remain intact and interest credits on participant account balances, as well as service credits for vesting and retirement eligibility, continue in accordance with the terms of the plan. In addition, supplemental transition credits have been provided to certain plan participants nearing retirement who would otherwise lose a portion of their anticipated pension benefit at age 65 as a result of freezing the current plan. Similar supplemental transition credits have been provided to certain plan participants who were grandfathered under a final average pay formula when the defined benefit plan was previously converted from a traditional pension plan to a cash balance plan.

	•		The elimination of all non-subsidized access to retiree health care and life insurance benefits effective January 1, 2010.

	•		The elimination of subsidized retiree health care benefits for any Medicare-eligible retirees effective January 1, 2010.

	•		The phase out of subsidized retiree health care benefits over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2010. With respect to the phase out of subsidized retiree health care benefits, if an eligible retiree becomes Medicare-eligible at any point in time during the phase out process noted above, such retiree will no longer be eligible for retiree health care coverage.

As a result of implementing the freeze on the Dex Media, Inc. Pension Plan covering IBEW employees, we have recognized a one-time net curtailment gain of $2.1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, which has been entirely offset by losses incurred on plan assets and previously unrecognized prior service costs that had been charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss. As a result of eliminating retiree health care and life insurance benefits for IBEW employees, we have recognized a one-time curtailment gain of $13.5 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. As a result of these actions, we will no longer incur funding expenses and administrative costs associated with this plan for IBEW employees.

On May 31, 2009, settlements of the Dex Media, Inc. Pension Plan occurred as defined by SFAS No. 88, Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Plans and for Termination Benefits. At that time, lump sum payments to participants exceeded the sum of the service cost plus interest cost component of the net periodic benefit costs. These settlements resulted in the recognition of an actuarial loss of $3.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

In accordance with SFAS No. 132, Employers’ Disclosures About Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits (Revised 2003), the following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:


	Pension Benefits
	Three Months						Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008

Service cost	$	890		$	1,730		$	2,331		$	3,748
Interest cost		1,781			2,597			3,871			5,187
Expected return on plan assets		(2,172	)		(2,737	)		(4,403	)		(5,435	)
Amortization of net gain		(27	)		—			(27	)		—
Settlement loss		3,593			—			3,593			—

Net periodic benefit cost	$	4,065		$	1,590		$	5,365		$	3,500


	Postretirement Benefits
	Three Months						Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008

Service cost	$	146		$	286		$	414		$	622
Interest cost		630			1,212			1,389			2,242
Amortization of net gain		(39	)		—			(39	)		—
Amortization of prior service cost		(1	)		(1	)		(3	)		(1	)
Curtailment Gain		(13,461	)		—			(13,461	)		—

Net periodic benefit (credit) cost	$	(12,725	)	$	1,497		$	(11,700	)	$	2,863

Net periodic pension benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 has declined when compared to the prior corresponding periods, excluding the settlement charge, due to the freeze of the Company’s defined benefit plans covering non-union employees. In connection with the freeze, all pension plan benefit accruals for non-union plan participants have ceased as of December 31, 2008, however, all plan balances remained intact and interest credits on participant account balances, as well as service credits for vesting and retirement eligibility, continue in accordance with the terms of the respective plans. In addition, supplemental transition credits have been provided to certain plan participants nearing retirement who would otherwise lose a portion of their anticipated pension benefit at age 65 as a result of freezing the current plans. Similar supplemental transition credits have been provided to certain plan participants who were grandfathered under a final average pay formula when the defined benefit plans were previously converted from traditional pension plans to cash balance plans.

Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 has declined when compared to the prior corresponding periods, due to the following curtailment related to non-union employees: (i) the elimination of all non-subsidized access to retiree health care and life insurance benefits effective January 1, 2009, (ii) the elimination of subsidized retiree health care benefits for any Medicare-eligible retirees effective January 1, 2009 and (iii) the phase out of subsidized retiree health care benefits over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2009 (with all non-union retiree health care benefits terminating January 1, 2012). With respect to the phase out of subsidized retiree health care benefits, if an eligible retiree becomes Medicare-eligible at any point in time during the phase out process noted above, such retiree will no longer be eligible for retiree health care coverage.

During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company made contributions of $3.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, to its pension plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company made contributions of $18.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively, to its pension plan. During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company made contributions of $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, to its postretirement plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company made contributions of $1.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively, to its postretirement plan. The Company expects to make total contributions of approximately $48.0 million and $5.6 million to its pension plan and postretirement plan, respectively, in 2009.

9. Business Segments

Management reviews and analyzes its business of providing local search solutions as one operating segment.

10. Legal Proceedings

On the Petition Date, the RHD Entities filed voluntary petitions for Chapter 11 relief under the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court in order to consummate a balance sheet restructuring. The cases are being jointly administered. The Company continues to operate its businesses as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. As of the Petition Date, all pending litigation wherein the Company is named as a defendant is generally stayed by operation of federal bankruptcy law, and absent further order of the Bankruptcy Court, no party, subject to certain exceptions, may take any action, also subject to certain exceptions, to recover on pre-petition claims against the Company. At this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases or its effect on our business or the actions described below.

We are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, as well as certain litigation and tax matters. In many of these matters, plaintiffs allege that they have suffered damages from errors or omissions in their advertising or improper listings, in each case, contained in directories published by us.

We are also exposed to potential defamation and breach of privacy claims arising from our publication of directories and our methods of collecting, processing and using advertiser and telephone subscriber data. If such data were determined to be inaccurate or if data stored by us were improperly accessed and disseminated by us or by unauthorized persons, the subjects of our data and users of the data we collect and publish could submit claims against the Company. Although to date we have not experienced any material claims relating to defamation or breach of privacy, we may be party to such proceedings in the future that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We periodically assess our liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters based upon the latest information available to us. For those matters where it is probable that we have incurred a loss and the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated, we record a liability in our condensed consolidated financial statements. In other instances, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of any liability because of the uncertainties related to both the probable outcome and amount or range of loss. As additional information becomes available, we adjust our assessment and estimates of such liabilities accordingly.

Based on our review of the latest information available, we believe our ultimate liability in connection with pending or threatened legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. No material amounts have been accrued in our condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to any such matters.

11. Related Party Transactions

Certain transactions are managed by RHD on a centralized basis. Under the centralized cash management program, RHD and the Company advance funds and allocate certain operating expenditures to each other. These net intercompany balances have been classified as a current asset at June 30, 2009 and current liability at December 31, 2008, as the Company intends to settle these balances with RHD during the next twelve months. Changes in net intercompany balances resulting from operating transactions have been presented as operating activities on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

On March 19, 2009, Dex Media East and Dex Media West each entered into a loan agreement (“loan agreements”) with RHD Service LLC (“RHD Service”), a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of RHD, for $50.0 million and $75.0 million, respectively. The loan agreements have a stated maturity date of March 31, 2010 and interest is payable on a quarterly basis commencing June 30, 2009 at an annual rate of 8.75%. Funds for the loans made to RHD Service were obtained from amounts borrowed under the unused portions of the Dex Media East Revolver and Dex Media West Revolver on February 13, 2009. These intercompany loans have been classified as a current asset at June 30, 2009 based on the stated maturity date and are presented as an investing activity on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Interest income resulting from these loans is included in interest expense, net on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

In general, substantially all of the net assets of the Company and its subsidiaries are restricted from being paid as dividends to any third party, and our subsidiaries are restricted from paying dividends, loans or advances to RHD with very limited exceptions, under the terms of the Dex Media East and Dex Media West credit facilities. We paid dividends to our parent during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 of $84.6 million and $125.4 million, respectively. These dividends are presented as a financing activity on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

12. Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events having an accounting or reporting impact as of August 7, 2009, which represents the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. On July 27, 2009, the RHD Entities filed the Plan together with the Disclosure Statement. See Note 1, “Business and Basis of Presentation — Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings and Plan of Reorganization” for additional information.

Item 2. Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations

Pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(a) of Form 10-Q: (i) the information called for by Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, has been omitted and (ii) we are providing the following Management’s Narrative Analysis of Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding our future operating results, performance, business plans or prospects and any other statements not constituting historical fact are “forward-looking statements” subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Where possible, words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “planned,” “estimated,” “potential,” “goal,” “outlook,” “may,” “predicts,” “could,” or the negative of those words and other comparable expressions, are used to identify such forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements reflect our current beliefs and assumptions with respect to our future results, business plans and prospects, based on information currently available to us and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, these statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and our actual results, business plans and prospects could differ significantly from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on, and we undertake no obligation to update, other than as imposed by law, any forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and contingencies include, but are not limited to, statements about Dex Media, Inc.’s (“Dex Media”) future financial and operating results, Dex Media’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements: (1) the impact of the RHD Entities bankruptcy filings and the related Chapter 11 bankruptcy process on our business, financial condition or results of operations; (2) changes in directory advertising spend and consumer usage; (3) regulatory and judicial rulings; (4) competition and other economic conditions; (5) changes in the Company’s and the Company’s subsidiaries’ credit ratings; (6) changes in accounting standards; (7) adverse results from litigation, governmental investigations or tax related proceedings or audits; (8) the effect of labor strikes, lock-outs and negotiations; (9) successful integration and realization of the expected benefits of acquisitions; (10) the continued enforceability of the commercial agreements with Qwest; (11) our reliance on third-party vendors for various services; and (12) other events beyond our control that may result in unexpected adverse operating results. Additional risks and uncertainties are described in detail in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Dex Media,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer collectively to Dex Media, Inc., its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries and its and their predecessors.

Corporate Overview

We are a leader in local search within the Dex States (defined below). During 2008, we generated revenues of approximately $1.6 billion by fulfilling two critical roles that address the needs of the growing local search marketplace:

	•		We provide simple, cost effective marketing solutions to our advertisers that generate a large volume of ready-to-buy consumers for their local businesses.

	•		We provide local search solutions to consumers that are easy to use and deliver highly relevant search results through a variety of print and online media platforms.

Through our Dex® Advantage, customers’ business information is collected and marketed through a single profile and distributed via a variety of local search products. Dex ensures advertisers’ business content and messages are found wherever, whenever and however consumers choose to search. The Dex Advantage spans multiple media platforms for local advertisers including print with the Dex directories, which we co-brand with Qwest, a recognizable brand in the industry, online and mobile devices with dexknows.com ^®, voice-activated directory search at 1-800-Call-Dex™ and leading search engines and other online sites via DexNet™.

We believe our ability to effectively compete in our industry is supported and enhanced by our local marketing consultants, who serve as trusted advisors for marketing support and service in the local markets we serve. Our local marketing consultants work closely with advertisers to first discover their needs and goals, assess their unique situations, and then recommend customized, cost-effective, directional local search solutions to help their businesses grow. Additional factors that support our ability to effectively compete in our industry include:

	•		Brand: Our Dex brand provides differentiation and an ability to leverage the capabilities of our print products into other media, such as online and mobile;

	•		Advertisers: Strong, long-term relationships with our advertisers;

	•		Products: Our multiple media local search solutions target consumers who are closer to making purchase decisions;

	•		Channel: We manage a large, established local sales organization; and

	•		Content: Our proprietary database contains up-to-date information for national and local businesses in 14 states and an infrastructure to service these national and local advertisers.

Dex Media, a wholly-owned subsidiary of R.H. Donnelley Corporation (“RHD” or “parent”), is the exclusive publisher of the “official” yellow pages and white pages directories for Qwest Corporation, the local exchange carrier of Qwest Communications International Inc. (“Qwest”), in Colorado, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota and South Dakota (collectively, the “Dex East States”) and Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming (collectively, the “Dex West States,” and, together with the Dex East States, the “Dex States”). We are the indirect parent of Dex Media East LLC (“Dex Media East”) and Dex Media West LLC (“Dex Media West”). Dex Media East operates the directory business in the Dex East States and Dex Media West operates the directory business in the Dex West States.

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings and Plan of Reorganization

Filing of Voluntary Petitions in Chapter 11

We intend to use the Chapter 11 Cases to consummate a balance sheet restructuring, resulting in a less leveraged capital structure that is better aligned with the ongoing cash flows of our business.

Commencement of Chapter 11 Cases

Proposed Plan of Reorganization

Recent Trends Related to Our Business

RHD and the Company have been experiencing lower advertising sales primarily as a result of declines in recurring business, including both renewal and increases to existing advertisers, mainly driven by (1) declines in overall advertising spending by businesses, (2) the significant impact of the weaker economy on smaller businesses in the markets in which we do business and (3) an increase in competition and more fragmentation in the local business search market. In addition, RHD and the Company have been experiencing adverse bad debt trends attributable to many of these same economic challenges in our markets. We expect that these economic challenges will continue in our markets, and, as such, our advertising sales, bad debt experience and operating results will continue to be adversely impacted in the foreseeable future.

In response to these economic challenges, we continue to actively manage expenses and are considering and acting upon a host of initiatives to streamline operations and contain costs. At the same time, we are improving the value we deliver to our advertisers by expanding the number of platforms and media through which we deliver their message to consumers as well as adjusting the pricing to give advertisers more exposure for the same price. We are also committing our sales force to focus on selling the value provided to local businesses through these expanded platforms, including our Dex directories, online and mobile devices, voice-activated directory search and leading search sites. In addition, we continue to invest in our future through initiatives such as new sales force automation, an advertiser self service system and portal, new mobile and voice search platforms and associated employee training. As economic conditions recover in our markets, we believe these investments will drive future revenue growth.

As a result of the credit and liquidity crisis in the United States and throughout the global financial system, substantial volatility in world capital markets and the banking industry has occurred. Several large banking and financial institutions have received funding from the federal government, been granted government loan guarantees, been taken over by federal regulators, merged with other financial institutions, or have initiated bankruptcy proceedings. These and other events have had a significant negative impact on financial markets, as well as the overall economy. This unprecedented instability has made it difficult for RHD and us to access the credit market and to obtain financing or refinancing. As such, the RHD Entities filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 on May 28, 2009, as noted above. In addition, as a result of the global economic instability, our pension plan’s investment portfolio has experienced significant volatility and a decline in fair value during 2008 and into 2009. However, because the values of our pension plan’s individual investments have and will fluctuate in response to changing market conditions, the amount of gains or losses that will be recognized in subsequent periods and the impact on the funded status of the pension plan and future minimum required cash contributions, if any, cannot be determined at this time.

On June 15, 2009, we agreed on a new three year collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of America (“IBEW”). The collective bargaining agreement with the Communications Workers of America (“CWA”) expires in October 2009. We intend to engage in good faith bargaining with the CWA, however, the results of negotiations cannot yet be determined.

Going Concern

Item 1, “Financial Statements — Unaudited” — Note 1, “Business and Basis of Presentation” contains a statement indicating that certain events could impact our ability to continue as a going concern. The assessment of our ability to continue as a going concern was made by management considering, among other factors: (i) our Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on May 28, 2009; (ii) the current global credit and liquidity crisis; (iii) the significant negative impact on our operating results and cash flows from the overall downturn in the global economy and an increase in competition and more fragmentation in the local business search market; (iv) that certain of our credit ratings have been recently downgraded; and (v) that RHD’s common stock ceased trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on December 31, 2008 and is now traded over-the-counter on the Pink Sheets. These considerations are further reflected by our goodwill impairment charges of $2.6 billion and intangible asset impairment charges of $603.0 million recorded for the year ended December 31, 2008. In management’s view, these circumstances and events raise substantial doubt as to whether the Company will be able to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

Accounting Matters

Other Significant Financing Developments


Description	Amount


Dex Media West
Term Loan A	$	6,971
Term Loan B		50,941
Revolver		4,826

Dex Media East
Term Loan A		34,176
Term Loan B		20,454
Revolver		4,985

Total repayment	$	122,353

On May 14, 2009, the Company exercised a 30-day grace period on $54.0 million in interest payments due on the following senior notes and senior discount notes:


Description	Amount


Dex Media, Inc.
8% Senior Notes due 2013	$	20,000
9% Senior Discount Notes due 2013		33,744

Dex Media West
5.875% Senior Notes due 2011		256

Total interest payments	$	54,000

On April 15, 2009, RHD exercised a 30-day grace period on $54.6 million in interest payments due on its 8.875% Series A-4 Senior Notes due 2017. As a result of exercising the 30-day grace period, certain existing interest rate swaps associated with the Dex Media East credit facility having a notional amount of $350.0 million were required to be settled on May 28, 2009. Cash settlement payments of $26.4 million were made during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 associated with these interest rate swaps.

Employee Retirement Savings and Pension Plans

Upon ratification of the new collective bargaining agreement with the IBEW on June 15, 2009 and in conjunction with the comprehensive redesign of RHD’s and the Company’s employee retirement savings and pension plans approved by the Compensation & Benefits Committee of RHD’s Board of Directors on October 21, 2008, the following plan changes have been approved for IBEW employees:

	•		Effective as of December 31, 2009, the Company will freeze the Dex Media, Inc. Pension Plan covering IBEW employees. In connection with the freeze, all pension plan benefit accruals for IBEW plan participants will cease as of December 31, 2009, however, all plan balances remain intact and interest credits on participant account balances, as well as service credits for vesting and retirement eligibility, continue in accordance with the terms of the plan. In addition, supplemental transition credits have been provided to certain plan participants nearing retirement who would otherwise lose a portion of their anticipated pension benefit at age 65 as a result of freezing the current plan. Similar supplemental transition credits have been provided to certain plan participants who were grandfathered under a final average pay formula when the defined benefit plan was previously converted from a traditional pension plan to a cash balance plan.

	•		The elimination of all non-subsidized access to retiree health care and life insurance benefits effective January 1, 2010.

	•		The elimination of subsidized retiree health care benefits for any Medicare-eligible retirees effective January 1, 2010.

	•		The phase out of subsidized retiree health care benefits over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2010. With respect to the phase out of subsidized retiree health care benefits, if an eligible retiree becomes Medicare-eligible at any point in time during the phase out process noted above, such retiree will no longer be eligible for retiree health care coverage.

Segment Reporting

Management reviews and analyzes its business of providing local search solutions as one operating segment.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”), the objective of which is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, SFAS No. 165 sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and as such, we adopted SFAS No. 165 as of June 30, 2009.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

Net Revenues

The components of our net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:


	Six months ended June 30,
(amounts in millions)	2009			2008			$ Change			% Change


Gross advertising revenues	$	712.8		$	811.2		$	(98.4	)		(12.1	)%
Sales claims and allowances		(18.3	)		(16.6	)		(1.7	)		(10.2	)

Net advertising revenues		694.5			794.6			(100.1	)		(12.6	)
Other revenues		10.3			13.0			(2.7	)		(20.8	)

Total net revenues	$	704.8		$	807.6		$	(102.8	)		(12.7	)%

Our advertising revenues are earned primarily from the sale of advertising in yellow pages directories we publish, net of sales claims and allowances. Advertising revenues also include revenues for Internet-based advertising products including online directories, such as dexknows.com and DexNet. Advertising revenues are affected by several factors, including changes in the quantity and size of advertisements, acquisition of new customers, renewal rates of existing customers, premium advertisements sold, changes in advertisement pricing, the introduction of new products, an increase in competition and more fragmentation in the local business search market and general economic factors. Revenues with respect to print advertising and Internet-based advertising products that are sold with print advertising are recognized under the deferral and amortization method. Revenues related to our print advertising are initially deferred when a directory is published and recognized ratably over the directory’s life, which is typically 12 months. Revenues with respect to our Internet-based advertising products that are sold with print advertising are initially deferred until the service is delivered or fulfilled and recognized ratably over the life of the contract. Revenues with respect to Internet-based services that are not sold with print advertising, such as DexNet, are recognized as delivered or fulfilled.

As a result of the deferral and amortization method of revenue recognition, recognized gross advertising revenues reflect the amortization of advertising sales consummated in prior periods as well as advertising sales consummated in the current period. As noted further below, advertising sales have continued to deteriorate due to the overall economic instability as well as an increase in competition and more fragmentation in the local business search market, which will result in lower recognized advertising revenues in future periods because, as noted, such revenues are recognized ratably over the directory’s life.

Gross advertising revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $98.4 million, or 12.1%, from the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in gross advertising revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is due to declines in advertising sales over the past twelve months, primarily as a result of declines in new and recurring business, mainly driven by (1) declines in overall advertising spending by businesses, (2) the significant impact of the weaker economy on smaller businesses in the markets in which we do business and (3) an increase in competition and more fragmentation in the local business search market.

Sales claims and allowances for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $1.7 million, or 10.2%, from the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in sales claims and allowances for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily due to higher claims experience associated with our Internet-based advertising products.

Other revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $2.7 million, or 20.8 %, from the six months ended June 30, 2008. Other revenues include late fees received on outstanding customer balances, barter revenues, commissions earned on sales contracts with respect to advertising placed into other publishers’ directories, and sales of directories and certain other advertising-related products.

Expenses

The components of total expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:


	Six months ended June 30,
(amounts in millions)	2009		2008		$ Change			% Change


Production and distribution expenses	$	101.1	$	115.1	$	(14.0	)		(12.2	)%
Selling and support expenses		191.0		201.9		(10.9	)		(5.4	)
General and administrative expenses		31.1		25.2		5.9			23.4
Depreciation and amortization		198.6		168.6		30.0			17.8
Impairment charges		—		2,557.7		(2,557.7	)		N/M

Total	$	521.8	$	3,068.5	$	(2,546.7	)		(83.0	)%

(N/M: Not Meaningful)

Certain costs directly related to the selling and production of directories are initially deferred and recognized ratably over the life of the directory under the deferral and amortization method of accounting to match revenue recognized relating to such directories, with cost recognition commencing in the month directory distribution is substantially complete. These costs are specifically identifiable to a particular directory and include sales commissions and print, paper and initial distribution costs. Sales commissions include amounts paid to employees for sales to local advertisers and to certified marketing representatives (“CMRs”), which act as our channel to national advertisers. All other expenses, such as sales person salaries, sales manager compensation, sales office occupancy, publishing and information technology services, are not specifically identifiable to a particular directory and are recognized as incurred. Our costs recognized in a reporting period consist of: (i) costs incurred in that period and fully recognized in that period; (ii) costs incurred in a prior period, a portion of which is amortized and recognized in the current period; and (iii) costs incurred in the current period, a portion of which is amortized and recognized in the current period and the balance of which is deferred until future periods. Consequently, there will be a difference between costs recognized in any given period and costs incurred in the given period, which may be significant.

Production and Distribution Expenses

Total production and distribution expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $101.1 million and $115.1 million, respectively. The primary components of the $14.0 million, or 12.2%, decrease in production and distribution expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009, were as follows:


	Six months ended
(amounts in millions)	June 30, 2009
	$ Change
Decreased print, paper and distribution costs	$	(6.7	)
Decreased internet production and distribution costs		(2.9	)
Decreased information technology (“IT”) expenses		(2.0	)
All other, net		(2.4	)

Total decrease in production and distribution expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009	$	(14.0	)

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, print, paper and distribution costs declined $6.7 million, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008. This decline is primarily due to improved efficiencies in the display of advertiser content in our print products, the refinement of our distribution scope across all of our markets and negotiated price reductions in our print expenses. The decrease in print, paper and distribution costs is also due to declines in print advertisements, which is a direct result of declines in new and recurring business, mainly driven by (1) declines in overall advertising spending by businesses, (2) the significant impact of the weaker economy on smaller businesses in the markets in which we do business and (3) an increase in competition and more fragmentation in the local business search market.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, internet production and distribution costs declined $2.9 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to a reduction in headcount and outside contractor services, partially offset by additional expenses related to internet distribution costs due to traffic purchased to generate usage for our advertisers’ business.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, production and distribution related IT expenses decreased $2.0 million, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to a reduction in headcount and outside contractor services. This decline is also due to additional spending during the six months ended June 30, 2008 associated with our IT infrastructure to support our products and services and enhancements and technical support of multiple production systems as we continued to integrate to a consolidated IT platform.

Selling and Support Expenses

Total selling and support expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $191.0 million and $201.9 million, respectively. The primary components of the $10.9 million, or 5.4%, decrease in selling and support expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009, were as follows:


	Six months ended
(amounts in millions)	June 30, 2009
	$ Change
Decreased commissions and salesperson costs	$	(12.5	)
Decreased directory publishing costs		(3.6	)
Increased bad debt expense		8.0
All other, net		(2.8	)

Total decrease in selling and support expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009	$	(10.9	)

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, commissions and salesperson costs declined $12.5 million, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to lower advertising sales as well as headcount reductions and consolidation of responsibilities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, directory publishing costs decreased $3.6 million, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to a reduction in headcount and related expenses resulting from the consolidation of our publishing and graphics operations.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, bad debt expense increased $8.0 million, or 19.3%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to deterioration in accounts receivable aging categories and increased write-offs, resulting from the adverse impact on our advertisers from the instability of the overall economy and tightening of the credit markets. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our bad debt expense represented 7.0% of our net revenue, as compared to 5.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. If advertisers fail to pay within specified credit terms, we may cancel their advertising in future directories, which could further impact our ability to collect past due amounts as well as adversely impact our advertising sales and revenue trends. We expect that these economic challenges will continue in our markets, and, as such, our bad debt experience will continue to be adversely impacted in the foreseeable future.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $31.1 million and $25.2 million, respectively. The primary components of the $5.9 million, or 23.4%, increase in G&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009, were as follows:


	Six months ended
(amounts in millions)	June 30, 2009
	$ Change
Increase in restructuring expenses	$	2.9
Increased share of allocated expenses		2.8
All other, net		0.2

Total increase in G&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009	$	5.9

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, restructuring expenses increased $2.9 million, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to outside consulting fees, headcount reductions, consolidation of responsibilities and vacated leased facilities.

The increase in G&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is also due to an increase in share of expenses allocated among RHD and its subsidiaries, resulting in an increase of $2.8 million.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization (“D&A”) expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $198.6 million and $168.6 million, respectively. Amortization of intangible assets was $185.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $153.6 million reported for the six months ended June 30, 2008. In connection with RHD’s impairment testing of its definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets at December 31, 2008, RHD evaluated the remaining useful lives of its intangible assets. Based on this evaluation, the remaining useful lives of all directory services agreements associated with RHD’s acquisition of the Company on January 31, 2006 (the “RHD Merger”) were reduced to 33 years effective January 1, 2009 in order to better reflect the period these intangible assets are expected to contribute to RHD’s future cash flow. The increase in amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is a direct result of reducing the remaining useful lives of these directory services agreements, partially offset by a reduction in amortization expense associated with a revision to the carrying values of our local and national customer relationships subsequent to impairment charges recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.

Annual amortization expense in 2009 is expected to increase by approximately $63.3 million as a result of the reduction of remaining useful lives associated with these directory services agreements and revision to the carrying values of our local and national customer relationships noted above.

Depreciation of fixed assets and amortization of computer software was $13.1 million and $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily due to accelerated amortization during the six months ended June 30, 2008 associated with software projects that were retired prior to their initial estimated service life.

Curtailment Gain, Net

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized a one-time curtailment gain of $13.5 million associated with the elimination of certain union retiree health care and life insurance benefits.

Impairment Charges

As a result of the decline in the trading value of our debt and RHD’s debt and equity securities during the first and second quarters of 2008 and continuing negative industry and economic trends that have directly affected RHD’s and our business, RHD performed impairment tests of its goodwill, definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”) and SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”), respectively. RHD used estimates and assumptions in its impairment evaluations, including, but not limited to, projected future cash flows, revenue growth and customer attrition rates. Based upon RHD’s impairment test of its goodwill, RHD recognized goodwill impairment charges of $2.5 billion and $660.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively, for total goodwill impairment charges of $3.1 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company’s share of the impairment charges, based on a discounted cash flow analysis, was $2.1 billion and $422.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively, for total goodwill impairment charges of $2.6 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2008. As a result of these impairment charges, we have no recorded goodwill at December 31, 2008 or June 30, 2009. RHD’s testing results of its definite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets indicated no impairment as of March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008.

Operating Income (Loss)

Operating income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:


	Six months ended June 30,
(amounts in millions)	2009		2008			$ Change		% Change

Total	$	196.5	$	(2,260.9	)	$	2,457.4		N/M

Operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $196.5 million, compared to an operating loss of $2.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The change to operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from operating loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is primarily due to the goodwill impairment charges noted above, as well as the revenue and expense trends described above.

Interest Expense, Net

Contractual interest expense that would have appeared on the condensed consolidated statement of operations if not for the filing of the Chapter 11 petitions was $180.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $170.1 million and $194.5 million, respectively, and includes $5.3 million and $4.6 million, respectively, of non-cash amortization of deferred financing costs.

Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes a non-cash charge of $5.1 million associated with the change in fair value of the Dex Media East interest rate swaps that were required to be settled and interest rate swaps no longer deemed financial instruments under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 133”) as a result of filing the Chapter 11 petitions. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 also includes a non-cash charge of $2.0 million resulting from amounts previously charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these interest rate swaps. The amounts previously charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the Dex Media East interest rate swaps will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the interest rate swaps based on future interest payments, as it is not probable that those forecasted transactions will not occur.

As a result of the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps associated with the refinancing of the former Dex Media West credit facility on June 6, 2008 and settlement and termination of certain of these interest rate swaps during the second quarter of 2009, interest expense includes a reduction of $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 resulting from the change in the fair value of these interest rate swaps. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 includes a non-cash charge of $15.0 million resulting from amounts previously charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these interest rate swaps, offset by a reduction to interest expense of $2.0 million resulting from the change in the fair value of these interest rate swaps since June 6, 2008. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 also includes the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $2.1 million associated with the refinancing of the former Dex Media West credit facility, which has been accounted for as an extinguishment of debt.

In conjunction with the RHD Merger and as a result of purchase accounting required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), our debt was recorded at its fair value on January 31, 2006. We recognized an offset to interest expense in each period subsequent to the RHD Merger through May 28, 2009 for the amortization of the corresponding fair value adjustment. The offset to interest expense was $7.7 million and $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The offset to interest expense was to be recognized over the life of the respective debt, however due to filing the Chapter 11 petitions, unamortized fair value adjustments at May 28, 2009 of $78.5 million were written-off and recognized as a reorganization item on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

The decrease in net interest expense of $24.4 million, or 12.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is primarily due to ceasing interest expense on our notes in default as a result of filing the Chapter 11 petitions and the non-cash charge of $15.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 resulting from amounts previously charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss noted above. The decrease in net interest expense is offset by the non-cash charge of $5.1 million associated with the change in fair value of the Dex Media East interest rate swaps and $2.0 million associated with amounts previously charged to accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the Dex Media East interest rate swaps, a reduction in interest income associated with our interest rate swaps due to a decline in interest rates, additional interest expense associated with borrowing the unused portions of our revolving credit facilities on February 13, 2009 and a decline in the offset to interest expense associated with the fair value adjustment of our debt noted above.

Reorganization Items, Net

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company has recorded $58.5 million of reorganization items on a separate line item on the condensed consolidated statement of operations in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountant’s Statement of Position 90-7, Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code (“SOP 90-7”). Reorganization items represent amounts that are directly associated with the process of reorganizing the business under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The following table displays the details of reorganization items for the six months ended June 30, 2009:


	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2009

Write-off of fair value adjustments	$	(78,511	)
Write-off of net premiums / discounts on long-term debt		(8,311	)
Professional fees		28,357

Total reorganization items	$	(58,465	)

We anticipate additional charges to reorganization items, net during the remainder of 2009.

Income Taxes

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(c) of Form 10-Q.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2009, due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the resulting current and deferred income tax expense and related footnote disclosures that was identified and reported as a material weakness in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2009, this material weakness in internal control over financial reporting has not been remediated.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls

Other than changes relating to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting noted above, there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2009 due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to certain deferred income tax assets and liabilities and the resulting current and deferred income tax expense and related footnote disclosures that was identified and reported as a material weakness in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2009, this material weakness in internal control over financial reporting has not been remediated.

The Company has developed the following plan to remediate the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above:

	•		During 2008, the Company began to implement, and during 2009 it intends to fully implement controls to formalize its evaluation of deferred income tax balances including a comprehensive reconciliation between deferred income tax balances determined on a basis in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for financial reporting purposes and those determined for tax reporting purposes;

	•		During 2008, the Company began to implement, and during 2009 it intends to fully implement an acceleration of the timing of certain tax review activities, including apportionment and allocation for income tax reporting purposes, during the financial statement closing process;

	•		The Company intends to improve documentation and institute more formalized review of tax positions taken, with senior management and external experts, to ensure proper evaluation and accounting treatment of complex tax issues; and

	•		The Company intends to evaluate and supplement and/or train internal resources, as necessary, and evaluate external experts.

We anticipate the actions described above and resulting improvements in controls will strengthen our internal control over financial reporting and will address the related material weakness identified as of December 31, 2008 that has remained as a material weakness as of June 30, 2009. However, because the institutionalization of the internal control processes requires repeatable process execution, and because many of these additional controls rely extensively on manual review and approval, the successful execution of these controls, for at least several quarters, may be required prior to management being able to definitively conclude that the material weakness has been fully remediated.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “2008 10-K”), which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes or additions to the risk factors disclosed in the 2008 10-K, except for the following, primarily due to the Chapter 11 filings by the RHD Entities:

Risks Related to the Chapter 11 Cases

1) The RHD Entities have filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code that may have an adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition and results of operation.

On May 28, 2009 (the “Petition Date”), the RHD Entities filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) in order to consummate a balance sheet restructuring. The cases are being jointly administered under the caption In re: R.H. Donnelley, Corporation, et al., Case No. 09-11833 (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). On July 27, 2009, the RHD Entities filed a proposed plan of reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court (the “Plan”). In addition to approval by the Bankruptcy Court, the Plan is subject to certain conditions that must be satisfied prior to its implementation. Although we believe that the Plan will satisfy all requirements for confirmation under the Bankruptcy Code, there can be no assurance that the Plan will be approved by the Bankruptcy Court or that the conditions precedent to its implementation will be satisfied or when, if ever, such confirmation and satisfaction will occur. Failure to obtain such confirmation or to satisfy such conditions to implementation may result in lengthier bankruptcy proceedings as we attempt to negotiate and implement an alternative plan of reorganization.

The timing of our emergence from bankruptcy and the terms of our emergence may affect our relationship with our creditors, customers, suppliers and employees and have a significant impact on our businesses, financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to continue to operate in bankruptcy and to emerge from bankruptcy will depend on various factors, including:

	•		our ability to comply with and operate under the terms of any cash management orders entered by the Bankruptcy Court from time to time, which subject us to restrictions on transferring cash and other assets;

	•		our ability to maintain adequate cash on hand and to generate cash from operations;

	•		our ability to fund emergence and to fund our operations after emergence from the bankruptcy process on reasonable terms;

	•		our ability to retain key employees during the pendency of our bankruptcy proceedings; and

	•		our ability to maintain good customer and supplier relationships in light of developments in our bankruptcy proceedings and the terms of our emergence.

For further information regarding our Chapter 11 proceedings and the Plan, see Note 1, “Business and Basis of Presentation — Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings and Plan of Reorganization” in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

2) Failure to obtain confirmation of the Plan may result in liquidation or alternative plan on less favorable terms.

Although the Company believes the Plan will satisfy all requirements for confirmation under the Bankruptcy Code, there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will reach the same conclusion. Moreover, there can be no assurance that modifications to the Plan will not be required for confirmation or that such modifications would not be sufficiently material as to necessitate the resolicitation of votes on the Plan.

In the event that any class of claims against the RHD Entities entitled to vote fails to accept the Plan in accordance with Section 1126(c) and 1129 (a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Company reserves the right: (i) to request that the Bankruptcy Court confirm the Plan in accordance with section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; and/or (ii) to modify the Plan in accordance with the terms of the Plan. While the Company believes that the Plan satisfies the requirements for non-consensual confirmation under section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code because it does not “discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to the classes that reject or are deemed to reject the Plan, there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will reach the same conclusion. There can be no assurance that any such challenge to the requirements for non-consensual confirmation will not delay the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 or prevent confirmation of the Plan.

If the Plan is not confirmed, there can be no assurance that the Chapter 11 Cases will continue rather than be converted into Chapter 7 liquidation cases or that any alternative plan or plans of reorganization would be on terms as favorable to the holders of claims against the Company as the terms of the Plan. If a liquidation or protracted reorganization of the Company’s estates were to occur, there is a substantial risk that the Company’s going concern value would be substantially eroded to the detriment of all stakeholders.

3) Failure of occurrence of the effective date may result in liquidation or alternative plan on less favorable terms.

There can be no assurance with respect to timing of the effective date of the Plan. The occurrence of the effective date is also subject to certain conditions precedent as described in the Plan. Failure to meet any of these conditions could result in the Plan not being consummated.

If the confirmation order with respect to the Plan is vacated, (i) the Plan shall be null and void in all respects; (ii) any settlement of claims or interests provided for in the Plan shall be null and void without further order of the Bankruptcy Court; and (iii) the time within which the Company may assume and assign or reject all executory contracts and unexpired leases shall be extended for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after the date the confirmation order is vacated.

If the effective date of the Plan does not occur, there can be no assurance that the Chapter 11 Cases will continue rather than be converted into Chapter 7 liquidation cases or that any alternative plan or plans of reorganization would be on terms as favorable to the holders of claims against the Company as the terms of the Plan. If a liquidation or protracted reorganization of the Company’s estates were to occur, there is a substantial risk that the Company’s going concern value would be eroded to the detriment of all stakeholders.

4) We may have insufficient liquidity to successfully operate our businesses.

We expect to incur significant costs as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases. We are currently financing our operations during our reorganization using cash on hand and cash generated by operations which constitutes cash collateral pursuant to, and in accordance with, final cash collateral orders which were agreed to by our secured lenders and approved by the Bankruptcy Court. In the event that we lose our authority to use cash collateral and does not have sufficient liquidity to fund its operations such that it needs to obtain additional financing, there can be no assurance as to the Company’s ability to obtain sufficient financing on acceptable terms or at all. The challenges of obtaining financing, if necessary, would be exacerbated by adverse conditions in the general economy and the volatility and tightness in the financial and credit markets. These conditions and our Chapter 11 Cases would make it more difficult for the us to obtain financing.

5) The extent of the Company’s leverage may limit its ability to obtain additional financing for operations.

Although the Plan will result in the repayment of approximately $715.0 million of secured debt and the elimination of approximately $5.7 billion of unsecured debt of the RHD Entities, the Company will continue to have a significant amount of indebtedness.

Such levels of indebtedness may limit the ability of the Company to refinance, obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes. Such levels of indebtedness may also limit the ability of the Company to adjust to changing market conditions and to withstand competitive pressures, possibly leaving the Company vulnerable in a downturn in general economic conditions or in their businesses or unable to carry out capital spending that is important to their growth and productivity improvement programs.

6) Historical financial information may not be comparable.

As a result of the consummation of the Plan and the transactions contemplated thereby, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company from and after the effective date of the Plan may not be comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in the Company’s historical financial statements.

7) Our businesses, financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted by the loss of customers and suppliers.

Difficulties of providing services while attempting to reorganize our businesses in bankruptcy may make it more difficult to maintain and promote our services and attract customers to our services and to keep our suppliers. Our suppliers, vendors and services providers may require stricter terms and conditions. The loss of any of our customers or suppliers during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases could have an adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may experience other adverse effects, including, without limitation, a loss of confidence by current and prospective suppliers. Any failure to timely obtain suitable supplies at competitive prices could materially adversely affect our businesses, financial condition and results of operations.

8) Our businesses could suffer from the loss of key personnel.

Among the Company’s most valuable assets are its highly skilled employees who have the ability to leave the Company and so deprive the Company of valuable skills and knowledge that contribute substantially to its business operations. Although the Company has attempted to maintain the confidence and dedication of its personnel through the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company cannot be sure that it will ultimately be able to do so and, if not, that it will be able to replace such personnel with comparable personnel. In addition, the Company cannot be sure that such key personnel will not leave after consummation of the Plan and emergence from Chapter 11. Further attrition may hinder the Company’s ability to operate efficiently, which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations and financial condition. In addition, so long as the Chapter 11 Cases continue, our senior management will be required to spend a significant amount of time and effort dealing with the reorganization instead of focusing exclusively on business operations.

9) Adverse publicity in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases or otherwise could negatively affect our businesses.

Adverse publicity or news coverage relating to us, including, but not limited to, publicity or news coverage in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, may negatively impact our efforts to establish and promote name recognition and a positive image after emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.

10) Pursuit of litigation by the parties in interest could disrupt the confirmation of the Plan and could have material adverse effects on the Company’s businesses and financial condition.

There can be no assurance that any parties in interest will not pursue litigation strategies to enforce any claims against the Company. Litigation is by its nature uncertain and there can be no assurance of the ultimate resolution of such claims. Any litigation may be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to the Company’s normal business operations and the Plan confirmation process, and a resolution of any such strategies that is unfavorable to the Company could have a material adverse affect on the Plan confirmation process or their respective businesses, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or cash flow.

11) Our inability to take advantage of business opportunities during the Chapter 11 Cases, without Bankruptcy Court approval.

Transactions outside the ordinary course of business are subject to the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court, which may limit our ability to respond timely to certain events or take advantage of certain opportunities. In addition, the Bankruptcy Code limits our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, sell assets, consolidate, merge or sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets or grant liens. These restrictions may place us at a competitive disadvantage. We may be unable to continue to grow our business through acquisitions and restrictions on our ability to pursue other business strategies, unless we obtain Bankruptcy Court approval for those transactions.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(b) of Form 10-Q.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(b) of Form 10-Q.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(b) of Form 10-Q.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit
Number		Document

31.1*		Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 by David C. Swanson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Dex Media, Inc. under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

31.2*		Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 by Steven M. Blondy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dex Media, Inc. under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

32.1*		Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by David C. Swanson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Steven M. Blondy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dex Media, Inc.


*		Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	DEX MEDIA, INC.
Date: August 7, 2009	By:	/s/ Steven M. Blondy
		Steven M. Blondy
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


	/s/ Sylvester J. Johnson
	Sylvester J. Johnson
	Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.		Document

31.1*		Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 by David C. Swanson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Dex Media, Inc. under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

31.2*		Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 by Steven M. Blondy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dex Media, Inc. under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

32.1*		Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by David C. Swanson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Steven M. Blondy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dex Media, Inc.


*		Filed herewith

Dex Media, Inc./new 10-Q