UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ~~_______~~ to ~~_______~~

Commission File Number: 333-127343

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 52-~~2287126~~228712 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3190 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 700, Falls Church, Virginia 22042 (571) 722-0210 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ Smaller reporting company o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) ~~Smaller Reporting Company o~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of ~~August~~November 311, 2009, all outstanding member units of DynCorp International LLC, which consisted of 100 member units, were owned by DynCorp International Inc. None of the units are publicly traded.

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Forward-Looking Statements		2
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)		3
Item 1. Financial Statements
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income—Fiscal Quarters Ended July 3, 2009 and July 4, 2008		3
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income—Three Months Ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008		3
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets—July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009		4
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income—Six Months Ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008		4
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Fiscal Quarters Ended July 3, 2009 and July 4, 2008		5
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets—October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009		5
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity—Fiscal Quarters Ended July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009		6
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Six Months Ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008		6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		7
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Member’s Equity—Six Months Ended October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009		7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		28
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		8
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		39
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		39
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		45
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		45
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		39
Item 1. Legal Matters		46
Item 1A. Risk Factors		4046
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		4046
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		4046
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		4046
Item 5. Other Information		4046
Item 6. Exhibits		4146
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements, written, oral or otherwise made, represent our expectation or belief concerning future events. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “thinks,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Statements regarding the amount of our backlog, estimated remaining contract values and estimated total contract values are other examples of forward-looking statements. We caution that these statements are further qualified by important economic, competitive, governmental or internal and technological factors that could cause our business, strategy or actual results or events to differ materially, or otherwise, from those in the forward-looking statements. These factors, risks and uncertainties include, among others, the following: the future impact of acquisitions, joint ventures or teaming agreements; our ~~substantial~~ substantial level of indebtedness; the outcome of any material litigation, government investigation or other regulatory matter; policy and/or spending changes implemented by the ~~new Presidential~~Obama administration; termination of key U.S. government contracts; changes in the demand for services that we provide; work awarded under our contracts, including without limitation, the Civilian Police, International Narcotics and Law Enforcement, Worldwide Personnel Protection Services (“WPPS”) and Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (“LOGCAP IV”) contracts; pursuit of new commercial business in the U.S. and abroad; activities of competitors; bid protests; changes in significant operating expenses; changes in availability of or cost of capital; general political, economic and business conditions in the United States (“U.S.”); acts of war or terrorist activities; variations in performance of financial markets; the inherent difficulties of estimating future contract revenue; anticipated revenue from indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts; expected percentages of future revenue represented by fixed-price and time-and-materials contracts, including increased competition with respect to task orders subject to such contracts; and statements covering our business strategy, those described in “Risk Factors” and other risks detailed from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, such forward-looking statements do not purport to be predictions of future events or circumstances and therefore there can be no assurance that any forward-looking statement contained herein will prove to be accurate. We assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.		FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME ~~(Amounts in thousands)~~

	For the Fiscal Quarter Ended
	July 3, 2009			July 4, 2008
Revenue	$	785,177		$	716,794
Cost of services		(699,093	)		(638,389	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(23,438	)		(27,851	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(10,145	)		(10,560	)
Operating income		52,501			39,994
Interest expense		(14,610	)		(14,215	)
Earnings from affiliates		1,054			1,117
Interest income		339			344
Other (loss)/income, net		(213	)		705
Income before income taxes		39,071			27,945
Provision for income taxes		(12,627	)		(9,316	)
Net income		26,444			18,629
Noncontrolling interests		(5,799	)		(649	)
Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	20,645		$	17,980

(Amounts in thousands)


	For the Three Months Ended
	October 2, 2009			October 3, 2008

Revenue	$	821,372		$	779,151

Cost of services		(727,279	)		(696,519	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(31,304	)		(25,994	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(10,238	)		(10,005	)

Operating income		52,551			46,633
Interest expense		(13,691	)		(14,905	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(162	)		(4,443	)
Earnings from affiliates		1,527			1,523
Interest income		103			677
Other (loss)/income, net		(12	)		960

Income before income taxes		40,316			30,445
Provision for income taxes		(13,301	)		(9,131	)

Net income		27,015			21,314
Noncontrolling interests		(6,460	)		(8,443	)

Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	20,555		$	12,871

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED ~~BALANCE~~STATEMENTS ~~SHEETS (Amounts~~OF ~~in thousands)~~ INCOME

	As of
	July 3, 2009			April 3, 2009
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	159,293		$	200,222
Restricted cash		5,700			5,935
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $348 and $68, respectively		639,470			564,432
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		110,025			124,214
Total current assets		914,488			894,803
Property and equipment, net		18,481			18,338
Goodwill		420,180			420,180
Tradename		18,318			18,318
Other intangibles, net		133,763			142,719
Deferred income taxes		8,430			12,788
Other assets, net		31,965			32,068
Total assets	$	1,545,625		$	1,539,214
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	—		$	30,540
Accounts payable		196,198			160,419
Accrued payroll and employee costs		120,500			137,993
Deferred income taxes		9,615			8,278
Other accrued liabilities		117,381			111,590
Income taxes payable		5,437			5,986
Total current liabilities		449,131			454,806
Long-term debt, less current portion		566,383			569,372
Other long-term liabilities		5,618			6,779
Total Liabilities		1,021,132			1,030,957
Commitments and contingencies
Member’s equity:
Member’s units, 100 outstanding		331,298			331,008
Retained earnings		200,200			179,555
Purchases of Parent’s common stock		(9,330	)		(8,618	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,510	)		(4,424	)
Total member’s equity attributable to DynCorp International LLC		518,658			497,521
Noncontrolling interests		5,835			10,736
Total equity		524,493			508,257
Total liabilities and member’s equity	$	1,545,625		$	1,539,214

(Amounts in thousands)


	For the Six Months Ended
	October 2, 2009			October 3, 2008

Revenue	$	1,606,549		$	1,495,945

Cost of services		(1,426,372	)		(1,334,908	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(54,742	)		(53,845	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(20,383	)		(20,565	)

Operating income		105,052			86,627
Interest expense		(28,301	)		(29,120	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(146	)		(4,443	)
Earnings from affiliates		2,581			2,640
Interest income		442			1,021
Other (loss)/income, net		(241	)		1,665


Income before income taxes		79,387			58,390
Provision for income taxes		(25,928	)		(18,447	)

Net income		53,459			39,943
Noncontrolling interests		(12,259	)		(9,092	)

Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	41,200		$	30,851

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENTS~~BALANCE ~~OF CASH FLOWS~~SHEETS (~~Dollars~~Amounts in thousands)

	For the Fiscal Quarter Ended
	As of
	July 3, 2009			July 4, 2008
	October 2, 2009			April 3, 2009
Cash flows from operating activities
ASSETS
Net income	$	26,444		$	18,629
Current assets:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	132,084		$	200,222
Depreciation and amortization		10,424			10,811
Restricted cash		15,990			5,935
Amortization of deferred loan costs		1,000			821
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $348 and $68, respectively		636,352			564,432
Allowance for losses on accounts receivable		264			—
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		116,277			124,214
Earnings from affiliates		(1,054	)		(1,117	)
Total current assets		900,703			894,803
Deferred income taxes		8,229			(1,609	)
Property and equipment, net		54,166			18,338
Equity-based compensation		866			(803	)
Goodwill		420,180			420,180
Other		(4	)		(256	)
Tradename		18,318			18,318
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Other intangibles, net		125,377			142,719
Restricted cash		235			5,236
Deferred income taxes		9,530			12,788
Accounts receivable		(75,302	)		(138,958	)
Other assets, net		30,177			32,068
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		14,035			(25,560	)
Total assets	$	1,558,451		$	1,539,214
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		23,131			56,382
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
Income taxes payable		(2,820	)		5,293
Current liabilities:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		5,448			(71,131	)
Current portion of long-term debt	$	14,137		$	30,540
Cash flows from investing activities
Accounts payable		213,699			160,419
Purchase of property and equipment		(780	)		(1,208	)
Accrued payroll and employee costs		113,275			137,993
Purchase of computer software		(514	)		(608	)
Deferred income taxes		14,700			8,278
Other assets		—			365
Other accrued liabilities		108,390			111,590
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,294	)		(1,451	)
Income taxes payable		3,843			5,986
Cash flows from financing activities
Total current liabilities		468,044			454,806
Payments on long-term debt		(34,337	)		(1,548	)
Long-term debt, less current portion		537,887			569,372
Purchases of Parent’s common stock		(712	)		—
Other long-term liabilities		6,101			6,779
Borrowings under other financing arrangements		—			22,319
Total liabilities		1,012,032			1,030,957
Payments of dividends to noncontrolling interests		(10,034	)		—
Commitments and contingencies
Other financing activities		—			(68	)
Member’s equity:
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(45,083	)		20,703
Member’s units, 100 outstanding		331,613			331,008
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(40,929	)		(51,879	)
Retained earnings		220,755			179,555
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		200,222			85,379
Purchases of Parent’s common stock		(9,085	)		(8,618	)
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	159,293		$	33,500
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,257	)		(4,424	)
Income taxes paid (net of refunds)	$	614		$	7,023
Total member’s equity attributable to DynCorp International LLC		540,026			497,521
Interest paid	$	4,599		$	10,866
Noncontrolling interests		6,393			10,736
Non-cash investing activities	$	—		$	4,265
Total equity		546,419			508,257
Total liabilities and member’s equity	$	1,558,451		$	1,539,214

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~MEMBER’S~~CASH ~~EQUITY (Dollars in Thousands)~~ FLOWS

													Total Member’s
													Equity
													Attributable to
										Accumulated Other			DynCorp
	Member’s			Retained			Parent’s			Comprehensive			International			Noncontrolling
	Units			Earnings			Common Stock			Income (Loss)			LLC			Interests			Total Equity
Balance at April 3, 2009	$	331,008		$	179,555		$	(8,618	)	$	(4,424	)	$	497,521		$	10,736		$	508,257
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income		—			26,444			—			—			26,444			—			26,444
Interest rate swap, net of tax		—			—			—			566			566			—			566
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax		—			—			—			348			348			—			348
Comprehensive income		—			26,444			—			914			27,358			—			27,358
Noncontrolling interest		—			(5,799	)		—			—			(5,799	)		—			(5,799	)
Comprehensive income attributable to DynCorp International LLC		—			20,645			—			914			21,559			—			21,559
Net income and comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests																	5,799			5,799
DIFZ financing, net of tax		112			—			—			—			112			—			112
Purchases of Parent’s common stock		—			—			(712	)		—			(712	)		—			(712	)
Equity-based compensation		191			—			—			—			191			—			191
Tax benefit associated with equity-based compensation		(13	)		—			—			—			(13	)		—			(13	)
Dividends declared to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			(10,700	)		(10,700	)
Balance at July 3, 2009	$	331,298		$	200,200		$	(9,330	)	$	(3,510	)	$	518,658		$	5,835		$	524,493

(Dollars in thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements


	For the Six Months Ended
	October 2, 2009			October 3, 2008

Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	53,459		$	39,943
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		20,979			21,087
Amortization of deferred loan costs		1,969			1,723
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		146			4,443
Recovery for losses on accounts receivable		(12	)		(173	)
Equity-based compensation		2,171			1,225
Loss on disposition of assets, net		453			—
Earnings from affiliates		(2,581	)		(2,640	)
Distributions from affiliates		1,725			1,385
Deferred income taxes		13,540			(4,112	)
Other		195			(304	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(10,055	)		7,326
Accounts receivable		(71,908	)		(64,104	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7,054			(26,070	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		21,519			54,096
Income taxes payable		(5,276	)		4,128

Net cash provided by operating activities		33,378			37,953

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(34,687	)		(2,303	)
Purchase of computer software		(1,635	)		(1,212	)
Change in cash restricted as collateral on letters of credit		—			(16,568	)
Other		60			365

Net cash (used in) investing activities		(36,262	)		(19,718	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings on long-term debt		—			323,751
Payments on long-term debt		(48,626	)		(301,129	)
Purchases of Parent’s common stock		(712	)		—
Borrowings under other financing arrangements		—			16,158
Payments of deferred financing cost		13			(9,645	)
Payments of dividends to noncontrolling interests		(15,936	)		—
Other financing activities		7			30

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(65,254	)		29,165

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(68,138	)		47,400
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		200,222			85,379

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	132,084		$	132,779

Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	9,848		$	18,965
Interest paid	$	27,103		$	30,054
Non-cash investing activities	$	3,394		$	10,722

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC

UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF MEMBER’S EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands)


												Total
												Member’s
												Equity
									Accumulated			Attributable
						Parent’s			Other			to DynCorp
	Member’s		Retained			Common			Comprehensive			International			Noncontrolling			Total
	Units		Earnings			Stock			Income (Loss)			LLC			Interests			Equity
Balance at April 3, 2009	$	331,008	$	179,555		$	(8,618	)	$	(4,424	)	$	497,521		$	10,736		$	508,257
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income		—	$	53,459						—		$	53,459			—			53,459
Interest rate swap, net of tax		—	$	0			—			769		$	769			—			769
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax		—	$	0			—			398		$	398			—			398

Comprehensive income		—	$	53,459			—			1,167		$	54,626			—			54,626
Noncontrolling interests			$	(12,259	)		—					$	(12,259	)		—			(12,259	)

Comprehensive income attributable to DynCorp			$	41,200			—			1,167		$	42,367			—			42,367
Net Income and comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests			$	0			—			—		$	0			12,259			12,259

DIFZ financing, net of tax		189	$	0			—			—		$	189			—			189
Purchases of Parent’s common stock		—	$	0			(712	)		—		$	(712	)		—			(712	)
Parent’s shares issued to settle RSU liability		55	$	0			245			—		$	300			—			300
Equity-based compensation		354	$	0			—			—		$	354			—			354
Tax benefit reduction associated with equity-based compensation		7	$	0			—			—		$	7			—			7
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests		—	$	0			—			—		$	0			(16,602	)		(16,602	)

Balance at October 2, 2009	$	331,613	$	220,755		$	(9,085	)	$	(3,257	)	$	540,026.0		$	6,393		$	546,419

See notes to consolidated financial statements

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

DynCorp International LLC, through its subsidiaries, is a leading provider of specialized, mission-critical professional and support services for the U.S. military, non-military U.S. governmental agencies and foreign governments. Our specific global expertise is in law enforcement training and support, security services, base and logistics operations, construction management, aviation services and operations and linguist services. ~~We also provide logistics support for all our services.~~ References herein to “DynCorp International”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us” or “LLC” refer to DynCorp International LLC and its subsidiaries unless otherwise stated or indicated by the context. DynCorp International Inc., our direct parent (our “Parent”), has no operations independent of our Company, DynCorp International LLC.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our domestic and foreign subsidiaries. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, we believe that all disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in the Company’s fiscal 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission (the “~~SEC”) on June 11, 2009.

We report our results on a 52/53 week fiscal year with the fiscal year ending on the Friday closest to March 31 of such year (April 2, 2010 for fiscal year 2010 which is a 52 week fiscal year). The ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 was a 13-week period from ~~April~~July 4, 2009 to ~~July~~October 32, 2009. The ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended October 3, 2008 was a 13-week period from July 5, 2008 to October 3, 2008. The six months ended October 2, 2009 was a 26-week period from April 4, 2009 to October 2, 2009. The six months ended October 3, 2008 was a 1427-week period from March 29, 2008 to ~~July~~October 43, 2008.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to fairly present our financial position at ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3, 2009, the results of operations for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarters~~and ~~ended~~six ~~July~~months ended October 32, 2009 and ~~July~~October 43, 2008, and cash flows for the ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarters~~months ended ~~July 3~~October 2, 2009 and ~~July 4~~October 3, 2008, have been included. The results of operations for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months and the six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year or for any future periods. We use estimates and assumptions required for preparation of the financial statements. The estimates are primarily based on historical experience and business knowledge and are revised as circumstances change. However, actual results could differ from the estimates.

As a result of the implementation of ~~Statement~~the ofnoncontrolling ~~Financial~~interest ~~Standards~~rules ~~(the~~in ~~“FASB”)~~accordance ~~No. 160~~with the ~~“Noncontrolling~~Financial ~~Interests~~Accounting inStandards ~~Consolidated~~Board ~~Financial~~Codification ~~Statements”~~ (“~~SFAS No. 160~~ASC”) 810 — Consolidation, certain prior ~~year~~ year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. This ~~included moving~~includes moving the $10.7 million noncontrolling interests balance (previously “Minority Interest”) as of April 3, 2009 out of the mezzanine section of the balance sheet and into the equity section. Such reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of both our domestic and foreign subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Generally, investments in which we own a 20% to 50% ownership interest are accounted for by the equity method. These investments are in business entities in which we do not have control, but have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies and are not the primary beneficiary as defined in ~~FASB~~ASC ~~Interpretation~~810 ~~No. 46R~~— ~~(Revised 2003), “~~Consolidation ~~of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN No~~. ~~46R”).~~ We have no investments in business entities of less than 20%.

~~We have ownership interests in three active joint ventures that are not consolidated into our~~8 financial statements as of July 3, 2009, and are accounted for using the equity method. We also have open joint venture agreements in inactive entities that are not material to our financials. Economic rights in active joint ventures are indicated by the ownership percentages in the table listed below.

Contingency Response Services LLC	45.0	%
Babcock DynCorp Limited	44.0	%
Partnership for Temporary Housing LLC	40.0	%

InWe ~~fiscal~~have ~~year 2009, we sold 50% of our~~ ownership ~~interest~~interests in ~~our~~three ~~previously~~active ~~wholly~~joint ~~owned subsidiary,~~ventures ~~DynCorp~~that ~~International~~are ~~FZ-LLC~~not ~~(“DIFZ”), for approximately $9.7 million. DIFZ was previously a wholly owned subsidiary and, therefore,~~ consolidated into our financial statements~~. The~~ ~~sale was accounted for~~ as ~~a capital transaction reflected in member’s units. We have financed the transaction by accepting three promissory notes provided by the purchaser. Repayment~~ of ~~the notes included a $0.5~~October ~~million~~2, ~~dollar payment in fiscal year~~ 2009, ~~with~~and ~~the~~are ~~remainder~~accounted tofor beusing ~~repaid through a portion of~~ the ~~purchaser’s~~equity ~~DIFZ quarterly dividends~~method. ~~A dividend was declared in June~~ ~~2009,~~Economic arights ~~portion of which reduced our note receivable balance. This dividend is expected to be paid~~ in ~~our~~active ~~second~~joint ~~quarter~~ventures ofare ~~fiscal~~indicated ~~year~~by ~~2010. Additionally,~~ the ~~next~~ownership ~~dividend~~percentages isin ~~scheduled to be declared and paid during~~ the ~~second quarter ending October 2, 2009. As of the date of the~~table ~~transaction,~~listed ~~it was determined that we were the primary beneficiary as defined in FIN No~~below. ~~46R.~~

The following table sets forth our ownership in joint ventures that are consolidated into our financial statements as of July 3, 2009. For the entities listed below, we are the primary beneficiary as defined in FIN No. 46R.


Contingency Response Services LLC	45.0	%
Babcock DynCorp Limited	44.0	%
Partnership for Temporary Housing LLC	40.0	%

The following table sets forth our ownership in joint ventures that are consolidated into our financial statements as of October 2, 2009. For the entities listed below, we are the primary beneficiary as defined in ASC 810 — Consolidation.


Global Linguist Solutions LLC	51.0	%
DynCorp International FZ-LLC	50.0	%

Noncontrolling Interests

We hold various ownership interests in a number of joint ventures as disclosed in Note 1 to our fiscal 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009. We are required by by GAAP to consolidate certain joint ventures for which we do not hold a 100% interest. We record ~~the~~ the impact of our joint venture partners’ interests in these consolidated joint ventures as noncontrolling interests. Noncontrolling interests is presented on the face of the income statement as an increase or reduction in arriving at net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC. The presentation of noncontrolling interests on the balance sheet is located in the equity section.

Restricted cash

Restricted cash represents cash restricted by certain contracts in which advance payments are not available for use except to pay specified costs and vendors for work performed on the specific contract and cash restricted and invested as collateral as required by our letters of credit. Changes in restricted cash related to our contracts are included as operating activities whereas changes in restricted cash for funds invested as collateral are included as investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Property and Equipment

Depreciation expense was $1.0 million and $0.87 million for the ~~quarters~~three months ended ~~July~~October 2, 2009 and October 3, ~~2009~~2008, respectively. Depreciation expense was $2.0 million and $1.5 million for ~~July~~the six months ended October 42, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively. Accumulated depreciation was $9.42 million and $8.6 million at ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively.

Accounting Policies

There have been no material changes to our other significant accounting policies asnot ~~detailed in Note~~disclosed 1 of our fiscal 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009, except for the accounting rule changes associated with noncontrolling interests, which only affects presentation and disclosureabove. ~~See Pronouncements Implemented below.~~

Accounting Developments

Pronouncements Implemented

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Standards (“SFAS”) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated ~~Financial~~ Financial Statements”, which is an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. ~~This~~Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into the Accounting Standards Codifications (“ASC”) 810 - Consolidation. ASC 810 covers several areas including (i) defining the way the noncontrolling interests should be presented in the financial statements and notes, (ii) ~~clarifies~~clarifying that all transactions between a parent and subsidiary are to be accounted for as equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest in the subsidiary and (iii) ~~requires~~requiring that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. This statement is effective for the fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We adopted this statement in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, which changed our presentation of noncontrolling interests on our consolidated statements of income, ~~consolidated~~ consolidated balance sheets, ~~and~~ consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated statement of member’s equity. We have applied ~~SFAS~~the ~~No. 160~~newly codified noncontrolling interest rules in ASC 810 retrospectively to the presentation of our balance sheets, statements of income and statements of ~~equity~~cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). This statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations.” This statement retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which SFAS No. 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This statement defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. Additionally, this statement requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the statement. Furthermore, this statement also requires acquisition related costs to be expensed as incurred. This statement has been adopted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.

In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements”. EITF 07-1 provides guidance for determining if a collaborative arrangement exists and establishes procedures for reporting revenue and costs generated from transactions with third parties, as well as between the parties within the collaborative arrangement, and provides guidance for financial statement disclosures of collaborative arrangements. EITF 07-1 became effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The adoption of EITF 07-1 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We have included additional disclosure on a collaborative arrangement in Note 12.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP No. 142-3”). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We will apply FSP No. 142-3 for any applicable events and transactions in fiscal year 2010.

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards No. 165 “Subsequent Events (as amended)” (“SFAS No. 165”), which provides guidance on management’s assessment of subsequent events. The new standard clarifies that management must evaluate, as of each reporting period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date “through the date that the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.” Management must perform its assessment for both interim and annual financial reporting periods. SFAS No. 165 requires management to disclose, in addition to the disclosures in Auditing Standards Section 560, the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that is the date on which the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 is effective prospectively for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. We have adopted this guidance through enhanced disclosures for any applicable events and transactions as further described in Note 15.

Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R) – “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination that Arise from Contingencies (“FSP FAS 141(R)”). This clarifies guidance pertaining to contingencies. FSP FAS 141(R) states that an acquirer shall recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value of an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency cannot be determined during the measurement period, an asset or a liability shall be recognized at the acquisition date if both of the following criteria are met which are (i) information available before the end of the measurement period indicates that it is probable that an asset existed or that a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. We will apply FSP FAS 141 (R) for any applicable events and transactions in fiscal year 2010.

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation 46(R)” (“SFAS No. 167”). This statement amends the guidance for (i) determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), (ii) the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, (iii) requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and (iv) changes the disclosure requirements in FIN 46(R)-8. This Statement is effective as of our first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. We are currently evaluating the future impact to SFAS No. 167 on our financial statements.

In ~~June~~December ~~2009~~2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. ~~168,~~141 ~~The~~(revised 2007), “~~FASB~~Business ~~Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles~~Combinations” (“SFAS No. ~~168~~141(R)”). This ~~standard~~statement ~~will replace~~replaces ~~SFAS~~FASB Statement No. ~~162~~141, “~~The~~Business ~~Hierarchy~~Combinations.” Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into the ASC 805 — Business Combinations. This topic ~~Generally~~area ~~Accepted~~retains ~~Accounting~~the ~~Principles~~fundamental (“requirements in SFAS No. ~~162”),~~141 ~~and~~that ~~establishes~~the ~~only~~acquisition ~~two~~method ~~levels~~ of accounting ~~GAAP,~~(which ~~authoritative~~SFAS ~~and non-authoritative~~No. 141 ~~The~~called ~~codification~~the ~~will~~purchase ~~become~~method) ~~the~~be ~~source~~used offor all business combinations and for an ~~authoritative,~~acquirer ~~nongovernmental~~to ~~GAAP,~~be ~~except~~identified for ~~rules~~each ~~and~~business ~~interpretive~~combination. ~~releases~~ASC of805 defines the ~~SEC,~~acquirer ~~which~~as the entity ~~are~~that ~~sources~~obtains control of ~~authoritative~~one ~~GAAP~~or ~~for~~more ~~SEC~~businesses ~~registrants.~~in As the ~~codification~~business ~~was~~combination ~~not~~and ~~intended~~establishes tothe ~~change~~acquisition ordate ~~alter~~as ~~existing~~the ~~GAAP,~~date itthat ~~will~~the ~~not~~acquirer ~~have~~achieves ~~any~~control. ~~impact~~Additionally, onASC ~~our~~805 ~~consolidated~~requires ~~financial~~an ~~statements.~~acquirer ~~All~~to ~~other~~recognize ~~non-grandfathered~~the assets acquired, ~~non-SEC~~the ~~accounting~~liabilities ~~literature~~assumed, ~~not~~and ~~included~~any noncontrolling interests in the ~~codification~~ ~~will~~acquiree ~~become~~at ~~non-authoritative.~~the ~~This~~acquisition ~~standard~~date, ismeasured ~~effective~~at ~~for~~their ~~financial~~fair ~~statements~~values ~~for~~as of that date, ~~interim~~with orlimited ~~annual~~exceptions ~~reporting~~specified ~~periods~~in ~~ending~~the ~~after~~statement. ~~September 15~~Furthermore, ~~2009~~ASC 805 also requires acquisition related costs to be expensed as incurred. ASC 805 was adopted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.

~~Note~~In 2December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements”. Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into the ASC 808 — ~~Composition~~Collaborative Arrangements. ASC 808 provides guidance for determining if a collaborative arrangement exists and establishes procedures for reporting revenue and costs generated from transactions with third parties, as well as between the parties within the collaborative arrangement, and provides guidance for financial statement disclosures of ~~Certain~~collaborative ~~Financial~~arrangements. ~~Statement~~ASC ~~Captions~~808 became effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The adoption of ASC 808 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We have included additional disclosure on a collaborative arrangement in Note 12.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP No. 142-3”). Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into both ASC 350 — Intangibles as well as ASC 275 — Risks and Uncertainties. This guidance amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). The applicable portions of the ASC are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We will apply the newly codified rules for any applicable events and transactions in fiscal year 2010.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1 “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination that Arise from Contingencies” (“FSP FAS 141(R)-1”). Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into ASC 805 — Business Combinations. This clarifies guidance pertaining to contingencies. The updated guidance states that an acquirer shall recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value of an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency cannot be determined during the measurement period, an asset or a liability shall be recognized at the acquisition date if both of the following criteria are met which are (i) information available before the end of the measurement period indicates that it is probable that an asset existed or that a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. We will apply the newly codified guidance in ASC 805 for any applicable events and transactions in fiscal year 2010.

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards No. 165 “Subsequent Events (as amended)” (“SFAS No. 165”), which provides guidance on management’s assessment of subsequent events. Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into the ASC — 855 Subsequent Events. The new guidance clarifies that management must evaluate, as of each reporting period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Management must perform its assessment for both interim and annual financial reporting periods. ASC 855 requires management to disclose, in addition to the disclosures in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Auditing Standards (“AU”) 560, the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that is the date on which the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. ASC 855 is effective prospectively for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. We have adopted this guidance through enhanced disclosures for any applicable events and transactions as further described in Note 15.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS No. 168”). Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into ASC 105 — Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. ASC 105 replaced SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 162”), and establishes only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. The codification is the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the codification will become non-authoritative. As the codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation 46(R)” (“SFAS No. 167”). SFAS No. 167 will be incorporated into ASC 810 - Consolidation once effective. This statement amends the guidance for (i) determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), (ii) the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, (iii) requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and (iv) changes the disclosure requirements in FIN 46(R)-8. This Statement is effective as of our first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. We are currently evaluating the future impact to SFAS No. 167 on our financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-013, “Revenue Recognition Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (“ASU-12”). This update (i) removes the objective-and-reliable-evidence-of-fair-value criterion from the separation criteria used to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting, (ii) replaces references to “fair value” with “selling price” to distinguish from the fair value measurements required under the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures guidance, (iii) provides a hierarchy that entities must use to estimate the selling price, (iv) eliminates the use of the residual method for allocation, and (v) expands the ongoing disclosure requirements. The amendments in this update will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the effect that adoption of this update will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Note 2—

The following tables present financial information of certain consolidated balance sheet captions (dollars in thousands).

Prepaid expenses and other current assets — Prepaid expenses and other current assets were:

	July 3,		April 3,
	October 2,		April 3,
	2009		2009
Prepaid expenses	$	53,~~959~~608	$	61,570
Inventories		1116,~~332~~971		10,840
Work-in-process		3230,~~606~~184		33,885
Joint Venture Receivables		3,746		2,491
Joint venture receivables		5,125		2,491
Other current assets		810,~~382~~389		15,428
Total	$	~~110~~116,~~025~~277	$	124,214

Prepaid expenses include prepaid insurance, prepaid vendor deposits, and prepaid rent, none of which individually exceed 5% of current assets. Inventories include helicopter assets purchased and available for sale.

Other assets, net — Other assets, net were:

	July 3,		April 3,
	October 2,		April 3,
	2009		2009
Deferred financing costs, net	$	1211,~~665~~464	$	13,828
Investment in affiliates		109,~~111~~517		8,982
Palm promissory notes, long-term portion		6,808		6,631
Promissory notes, long-term portion		6,968		6,631
Other		2,~~381~~228		2,627
Total	$	3130,~~965~~177	$	32,068

~~Deferred financing cost is amortized to interest expense. Amortization related to deferred~~11 ~~financing costs was $1.1 million and $0.8 million as of the quarters ended July 3, 2009 and July 4, 2008, respectively.~~

Accrued payroll and employee costs — Accrued payroll and employee costs were:

	July 3,		April 3,
	October 2,		April 3,
	2009		2009
Wages, compensation and other benefits (1)	$	9084,~~752~~496	$	108,879
Accrued vacation		26,~~670~~917		26,329
Accrued contributions to employee benefit plans		31,~~078~~862		2,785
Total	$	~~120~~113,~~500~~275	$	137,993


⁽¹⁾		Includes RSUs accounted for as liability awards presented in Note 9.

Other accrued liabilities — Accrued liabilities were:

	July 3,		April 3,
	October 2,		April 3,
	2009		2009
Deferred revenue	$	3022,~~514~~387	$	30,739
Insurance expense		3027,~~190~~567		28,061
Interest expense and short-term swap liability		2111,~~113~~129		11,688
Contract losses		56,~~730~~032		11,730
Legal matters		1821,~~507~~270		16,993
Other		1120,~~327~~005		12,379
Total	$	~~117~~108,~~381~~390	$	111,590

10Deferred revenue was primarily due to customer payments in excess of revenue recognized. Contract losses relate to accrued losses recorded on certain Afghanistan construction contracts.

Deferred revenue is primarily due to payments in excess of revenue recognized. Contract losses relate to accrued losses recorded on certain Afghanistan construction contracts.

Note 3—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As announced on April 6, 2009, we changed from reporting financial results on our three segments utilized in fiscal year 2009 to reporting under three new segments, beginning with fiscal year 2010. Under the new organizational alignment, the three prior ~~business~~operating segments of International Security Services (“ISS”), Logistics and Construction Management (“LCM”) and Maintenance and Technical Support (“MTSS”) ~~are~~were realigned into three segments, two of which, Global Stabilization and Development Solutions (“GSDS”) and Global Platform Support Solutions (“GPSS”) are wholly-owned, and a third segment, Global Linguist Solutions (“GLS”), is a 51% owned joint venture.

The goodwill carrying value was reallocated to the three new operating segments using a relative fair value approach based on the new reporting unit structure. The GLS segment has no goodwill carrying value as this distinct service line came into existence after the legacy goodwill carrying value was established. The change in presentation of our goodwill balance by operating segment from April 3, 2009 to ~~July~~October 32, 2009 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	~~ISS~~LCM/GSDS		~~LCM~~ISS /GLS			MTSS/GPSS		Total
Goodwill balance as of April 3, 2009	$	~~300~~39,~~094~~935	$	39300,~~935~~094		$	80,151	$	420,180
Reallocation of goodwill		169,138		(300,094	)		130,956		—
Goodwill balance as of October 2, 2009	$	209,073	$	—		$	211,107	$	420,180

All of the contracts that made up the ISS and LCM operating segments were realigned into the GSDS operating segment except for GLS, which became a unique operating segment and the Specialty Aviation & Counter Drug strategic business area (“SBA”), which was realigned into the GPSS operating segment. In addition to the Specialty Aviation & Counter Drug SBA, all legacy MTSS programs were realigned into the GPSS operating segment.

(Dollars in thousands)		GSDS				GPSS				GLS		Total
Goodwill balance as of July 3, 2009		$	209,073			$	211,107			$—		$	420,180

The following tables provide information about changes relating to intangible assets:

	July 3, 2009
	Weighted
	Average
	Useful Life		Gross		Accumulated
(Amounts in thousands, except years)	(Years)		Carrying Value		Amortization			Net
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer-related intangible assets		8.5	$	290,716	$	(163,793	)	$	126,923
Other		5.4		15,865		(9,025	)		6,840
			$	306,581	$	(172,818	)	$	133,763
Indefinite-lived intangible assets — Tradename			$	18,318	$	—		$	18,318

	April 3, 2009
	Weighted
	Average
	Useful Life		Gross		Accumulated
(Amounts in thousands, except years)	(Years)		Carrying Value		Amortization			Net
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer-related intangible assets		8.5	$	290,716	$	(155,142	)	$	135,574
Other		5.5		15,351		(8,206	)		7,145
			$	306,067	$	(163,348	)	$	142,719
Indefinite-lived intangible assets — Tradename			$	18,318	$	—		$	18,318

Amortization expense for customer-related and other intangibles was $9.5 million and $10.1 million for the fiscal quarters ended July 3, 2009 and July 4, 2008, respectively.

The following ~~schedule~~tables ~~outlines~~provide aninformation ~~estimate~~about ofchanges ~~future~~relating ~~amortization~~to ~~based upon the finite-lived~~ intangible assets ~~owned at July 3, 2009~~:

	Amortization
	October 2, 2009
	Expense
	Weighted
	(Dollars in thousands)
	Average
Nine month period ended April 2, 2010	$	28,255
	Useful Life		Gross		Accumulated
Estimate for fiscal year 2011		33,618
(Amounts in thousands, except years)	(Years)		Carrying Value		Amortization			Net
Estimate for fiscal year 2012		22,986
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Estimate for fiscal year 2013		19,308
Customer-related intangible assets		8.5	$	290,716	$	(172,443	)	$	118,273
Estimate for fiscal year 2014		8,184
Other		5.3		17,012		(9,908	)		7,104
Thereafter		21,412
			$	307,728	$	(182,351	)	$	125,377
Indefinite-lived intangible assets — Tradename			$	18,318	$	—		$	18,318


	April 3, 2009
	Weighted
	Average
	Useful Life		Gross Carrying		Accumulated
(Amounts in thousands, except years)	(Years)		Value		Amortization			Net

Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer-related intangible assets		8.5	$	290,716	$	(155,142	)	$	135,574
Other		5.5		15,351		(8,206	)		7,145

			$	306,067	$	(163,348	)	$	142,719


Indefinite-lived intangible assets — Tradename			$	18,318	$	—		$	18,318

Amortization expense for customer-related and other intangibles was $9.5 million for each of the three months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, and $19.0 million and $19.6 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively.

The following schedule outlines an estimate of future amortization based upon the finite-lived intangible assets owned at October 2, 2009:


	Amortization
	Expense
	(Dollars in thousands)
Six month period ended October 2, 2010	$	18,995
Estimate for fiscal year 2011		33,926
Estimate for fiscal year 2012		23,248
Estimate for fiscal year 2013		19,480
Estimate for fiscal year 2014		8,282
Thereafter		21,446

Note 4— Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	Three Months Ended
	July 3,			July 4,
	October 2,			October 3,
	2009			2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Current portion:
Federal	$	35,~~162~~346		$	911,~~589~~024
State		~~393~~676			~~807~~842
Foreign		~~843~~1,968			21,~~539~~271
		4,398			12,935
		7,990			13,137
Deferred portion:
Federal		75,~~959~~146			(3,~~496~~874	)
State		~~266~~172			(~~117~~130	)
Foreign		4(7	)		(62	)
		8,229			(3,619	)
		5,311			(4,006	)
Provision for income taxes	$	1213,~~627~~301		$	9,~~316~~131


	Six Months Ended
	October 2,			October 3,
	2009			2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Current portion:
Federal	$	8,509		$	20,610
State		1,069			1,650
Foreign		2,810			3,811

		12,388			26,071

Deferred portion:
Federal		13,105			(7,370	)
State		438			(246	)
Foreign		(3	)		(8	)

		13,540			(7,624	)

Provision for income taxes	$	25,928		$	18,447

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reported as:

	July 3,			April 3,
	October 2,			April 3,
	2009			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
Current deferred tax liabilities	$	(914,~~615~~700	)	$	(8,278	)
Non-current deferred tax assets		89,~~430~~530			12,788
Deferred tax (liabilities)/assets, net	$	(15,~~185~~170	)	$	4,510

As of ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3, 2009, we have $911.30 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of of total ~~unrecognized~~uncertain tax ~~benefits~~positions. The amount of unrecognized tax ~~benefits~~positions that, if recognized, ~~would~~ would affect the effective tax rate was $0.23 million and $0.1 million for ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively.

ItWe isdo ~~reasonably~~not ~~possible~~expect ~~that~~any inmaterial ~~the~~changes ~~next~~to ~~12 months~~our ~~the~~effective ~~gross~~tax ~~amount~~rate as a result of unrecognized tax ~~benefits~~liabilities. ~~will~~We ~~increase~~recognize byinterest accrued related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense and penalties in income tax expense in our unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income, which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior periods. We have recorded a liability of approximately $0.24 million. ~~However,~~and we$0.2 million dofor ~~not~~the ~~expect~~payment ~~any~~of ~~material~~interest and ~~changes~~penalties toas ~~its~~of ~~effective~~October 2, ~~tax~~2009 ~~rate~~and asApril 3, a2009, ~~result~~respectively.

We recognize interest accrued related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense and penalties in income tax expense in our unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income, which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior periods. We have recorded a liability of approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the payment of interest and penalties as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively.

We file income tax returns in U.S. federal and state jurisdictions and in various foreign jurisdictions. The statute of limitations is open for federal and state examinations for our fiscal year 2005 forward and, with few exceptions, foreign income tax examinations for the calendar year 2005 forward.

For the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~and six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 our effective tax rate was 33.0% and 32.37%, respectively, as compared to 33 30.30% and 31.6% for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~and six months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008, respectively. The reduction in the effective tax rate below the U.S. marginal federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily due to the impact of our consolidated joint ventures such as GLS and DynCorp International FZ-LLC (“DIFZ”). These are consolidated for financial reporting purposes; but, are ~~considered~~not ~~unconsolidated~~consolidated entities for U.S. income tax purposes.

Note 5— Accounts Receivable

Accounts ~~Receivable~~receivable, net consisted of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)	~~July~~October 32, 2009		April 3, 2009
Billed, net	$	272,344	$	220,501
Billed	$	239,303	$	220,501
Unbilled		~~367~~397,~~126~~049		343,931
Total	$	~~639~~636,~~470~~352	$	564,432

Unbilled receivables at ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3, 2009 include $3143.64 million and $30.7 million, respectively, related to costs incurred on projects for which we have been requested by by the customer to begin work under a new contract or extend work under an existing contract, and ~~for~~ for which formal contracts or contract modifications have not been executed at the end of the respective periods. These amounts include $5.3 million related to contract claims at ~~July~~October 32, ~~2009~~ 2009 and April 3, 2009. The balance of unbilled receivables consists of costs and fees billable immediately, on contract completion or other specified events, the majority of which is expected to be billed and collected within one year.

Note 6—Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

	July 3,			April 3,
	October 2,			April 3,
	2009			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
Term loans	$	176,637		$	200,000
9.5% Senior subordinated notes(1)		~~389~~375,~~746~~387			399,912
		566,383			599,912
		552,024			599,912
Less current portion of long-term debt		—(14,137	)		(30,540	)
Total long-term debt	$	~~566~~537,~~383~~887		$	569,372

(1) This includes the impact of the discount which had a carrying value of ($0.98) million ($1.0) million as of ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively.

For a description of our indebtedness, see Note 7, Long-Term Debt, to the consolidated financial statements in our fiscal 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009.

Senior Secured Credit Facility

We are required, under certain circumstances as defined in our credit agreement, to use a percentage of excess cash generated from operations to reduce the outstanding principal of the term loans in the following year. Such payments are due near the end of the first quarter of the following fiscal year. We paid $23.4 million under the excess cash flow requirement in June 2009 stemming from our fiscal year 2009 results. This payment was lower than the $30.5 million estimate in our fiscal year 2009 annual report as several members of our banking syndicate waived their excess cash flow principal payment option. The excess cash flow measurement is an annual requirement of the credit agreement and, as a result, we cannot predict with certainty the excess cash flow that will be generated, if any, for the results related to the fiscal year ending April 2, 2010.

~~All of our senior secured credit facility borrowings are considered long term as principal payments do not start to occur until September 2010.~~ At ~~July~~October 32, 2009, availability under the revolving credit facility for additional borrowings was approximately $170.56 million (which gives effect to approximately $29.54 million of outstanding letters of credit, which reduced our availability by that amount). The credit agreement requires an unused line fee equal to 0.5% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, for the unused portion of the revolving credit facility. The fair value of our borrowings under our senior secured credit facility approximates 9899.5% of the carrying amount based on market quotes as of ~~July~~October 32, 2009. Borrowings under the credit facility are guaranteed by the Parent and each of our subsidiaries, subject to limited exceptions. We are secured by substantially all of our Parent’s assets.

9.5% Senior Subordinated Notes

The senior subordinated notes are general unsecured obligations of our Company and certain guarantor subsidiaries. These contain certain covenants and restrictions, which limit our ability to pay dividends to our Parent. We can redeem the senior subordinated notes, in whole or in part, at defined redemption prices, plus accrued interest toas of the redemption date. In June 2009, our Parent’s ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors added a requirement that s repurchases of our Parent’s common stock could only occur if the price was less than or equal to $14.00 per share. ~~In the first~~ quarter of fiscal year 2010, we purchased 54,900 shares for $0.7 million at an average price of $12.93 per share. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, under a board authorized program, we repurchased $10.3 million of face value of our senior subordinated notes for $10.0 million, including applicable fees. When including the impact of the applicable portion of the discount and deferred financing fees, the redemption resulted in an insignificant gain.

~~The~~In ~~fair~~the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 under a board authorized program, we purchased 54,900 shares for $0.7 million at an average price of $12.93 per share. We also repurchased $10.3 million in face value of ~~the~~our senior subordinated notes isfor ~~based~~$10.0 million, onincluding ~~their~~applicable ~~quoted~~fees. ~~market~~In ~~value~~the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, we repurchased $14.5 million Asin face value of our senior ~~July~~ subordinated notes for $14.3, million ~~2009~~including applicable fees. The repurchases, when including the impact ~~quoted~~of ~~market~~the ~~value~~discount and deferred financing fees, produced an overall loss of $0.1 million as of the ~~senior~~six ~~subordinated~~months ~~notes~~ended ~~was~~October 2, 2009. These repurchases utilized approximately 97100% of the $25 ~~stated~~million, ~~value~~leaving no availability for additional repurchases under the current plan.

~~Note 7— Interest Rate Derivatives~~15

AtTable April 3, 2009, our derivative instruments consisted of two interest rate swap agreements. The $168.6 million dollar derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge that effectively fixes the interest rate on the applicable notional amount of our variable rate debt. The $31.4 million swap derivative no longer qualifies for hedge accounting as it was fully dedesignated as of July 3, 2009. Contents

The fair value of the senior subordinated notes is based on their quoted market value. As of October 2, 2009, the quoted market value of the senior subordinated notes was approximately 102% of stated value.

Note 7—Interest Rate Derivatives

At October 2, 2009, our derivative instruments consisted of two interest rate swap agreements. The $168.6 million derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge that effectively fixes the interest rate on the applicable notional amount of our variable rate debt. The $31.4 million swap derivative no longer qualifies for hedge accounting as it continues to be fully dedesignated as of October 2, 2009.

Fixed

Variable

Notional

Interest

Interest Rate

Date Entered

Amount

Rate Paid*

Received

Expiration Date

April 2007

168,620

4.975

3-month LIBOR

May 2010

April 2007

31,380

4.975

3-month LIBOR

May 2010

* Plus applicable margin (2.5% at ~~July~~October 32, 2009).

During the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009, we paid $12.92 million and $4.1 million in net settlements and incurred $2.12 million of expenses, of which $1.9 million was recorded to interest expense and $0.23 million was recorded to other (loss)/income. ~~In the quarter ended July 4, 2008, we paid $1.6 million in net settlements~~ and incurred $14.93 million of expenses, of which $13.58 million was recorded to interest expense and $0.45 million was recorded to other (loss)/income, respectively.

During the three and six months ended October 3, 2008, we paid $1.5 million and $3.1 million in net settlements and incurred $1.1 million of expenses, which was recorded to interest expense and incurred $3.0 million in expenses of which $2.6 million was recorded to interest expense and $0.4 million was recorded to other (loss)/income, respectively.

Amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings as net cash settlements occur, changes from quarterly derivative valuations are updated, new circumstances dictate the disqualification of hedge accounting and adjustments for cumulative ineffectiveness are recorded.

The fair values of our derivative instruments and the line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheet to which they were recorded as of ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3, 2009 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Fair Value at

~~Fair Value at~~

Fair Value at

~~Fair Value at~~

Derivatives designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133

Balance Sheet Location

July 3, 2009

April 3, 2009

Derivatives designated as hedges under ASC 815

Balance Sheet Location

October 2, 2009

April 3, 2009

Interest Rate Swaps

Other accrued liabilities

5,221

~~5,565~~

5,259

~~5,259~~

Interest Rate Swaps

Other long-term liabilities

—

957

~~957~~

Total

~~Total~~

5,221

~~5,565~~

6,216

~~6,216~~

		Fair Value at		~~Fair Value at~~		Fair Value at		~~Fair Value at~~
Derivatives not designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133	Balance Sheet Location			July 3, 2009				April 3, 2009
Derivatives not designated as hedges under ASC 815	Balance Sheet Location	October 2, 2009				April 3, 2009
Interest Rate Swaps	Other accrued liabilities	$	964	$	~~1,028~~	$	893	$	~~893~~
Interest Rate Swaps	Other long-term liabilities		—		—		182		~~182~~
Total	~~Total~~	$	964	$	~~1,028~~	$	1,075	$	~~1,075~~
Total Derivatives		$	6,185	$	~~6,593~~	$	7,291	$	~~7,291~~

1416

The effects of our derivative instruments on other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and our Consolidated Statements of Income for the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

Change in OCI from

Gains (Losses)

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

~~IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES~~

Derivatives Designated as

Recognized in OCI

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Recognized in OCI

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

Cash Flow Hedging

on Derivatives

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

Line Item

on Derivatives

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Instruments under SFAS

(Effective Portion)

Line Item in Statements

in Statements

Derivatives Designated as

(Effective Portion)

Line Item

No. 133

Quarter ended July 3, 2009

of Income

Amount

of Income

Amount

Cash Flow Hedging

Three Months ended

in Statements

Interest rate derivatives

(5,319

)

Interest expense

(1,898

)

Other (loss)/income, net

—

Instruments under ASC 815

October 2, 2009

of Income

Amount

of Income

Amount

Total

(5,319

)

(1,898

)

—

Interest rate derivatives

320

Interest expense

(1,854

)

Other (loss)/income, net

—

Total

320

(1,854

)

—

The effects of our derivative instruments on other OCI and our Consolidated Statements of Income for the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~July~~October 42, ~~2008~~2009 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

Change in OCI from

Gains (Losses)

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

~~IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES~~

Derivatives Designated as

Recognized in OCI

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Recognized in OCI

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

Cash Flow Hedging

on Derivatives

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

Line Item

on Derivatives

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Instruments under SFAS

(Effective Portion)

Line Item in Statements

in Statements

Derivatives Designated as

(Effective Portion)

Line Item

No. 133

Quarter ended July 4, 2008

of Income

Amount

of Incomes

Amount

Cash Flow Hedging

Six Months ended

in Statements

Interest rate derivatives

(5,627

)

Other (loss)/income, net

(1,812

)

Interest expense

308

Instruments under ASC 815

October 2, 2009

of Income

Amount

of Income

Amount

Total

(5,627

)

(1,812

)

308

Interest rate derivatives

1,206

Interest expense

(3,754

)

Other (loss)/income net

—

Total

1,206

(3,754

)

—

~~We had a hedge dedesignation event in the quarter ended July 4, 2008. We did not have any hedge dedesignation events in the quarter ended July 3, 2009.~~ The effects of our derivative ~~instruments~~ ~~not designated as hedging~~ instruments ~~under~~on ~~SFAS~~OCI ~~No. 133~~and on our Consolidated ~~Statement of~~Statements of Income for the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~July~~October 3, ~~2009 and quarter ended July 4,~~ 2008 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

	AMOUNT OF GAIN OR
	Change in OCI from
	(LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN
	Gains (Losses)			GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM						GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED
Derivatives not Designated	INCOME ON DERIVATE
	Recognized in OCI			ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME						IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES
as Hedging Instruments	Line Item in Statements			July 3, 2009				July 4, 2008
	on Derivatives			(EFFECTIVE PORTION)						(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)
under SFAS No. 133	of Income			Amount				Amount
Derivatives Designated as	(Effective Portion)			Line Item						Line Item
Interest rate derivatives	Other (loss)/ income, net			$	(188	)		$	(404	)
Cash Flow Hedging	Three Months ended			in Statements						in Statements
Total				$	(188	)		$	(404	)
Instruments under ASC 815	October 3, 2008			of Income		Amount				of Incomes	Amount
Interest rate derivatives	$	(56	)	Interest expense		$	(918	)		Interest expense	$	(152	)
Total	$	(56	)			$	(918	)			$	(152	)

~~As of July 3, 2009, we estimate that approximately $5.3 million of losses associated with the~~17 interest rate swap related to $168.6 million of notional debt included in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings over the remaining life of the derivative which expires in May 2010. The other interest rate swap does not qualify for hedge accounting and has been marked to market, which generated a $1.0 million liability at July 3, 2009. See Note 14 for fair value disclosures associated with these hedges.

The effects of our derivative instruments on OCI and our Consolidated Statements of Income for the six months ended October 3, 2008 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Change in OCI from

Gains (Losses)

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

Recognized in OCI

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

on Derivatives

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Derivatives Designated as

(Effective Portion)

Line Item

Cash Flow Hedging

Six Months ended

in Statements

Instruments under ASC 815

October 3, 2008

of Income

Amount

of Incomes

Amount

Interest rate derivatives

5,571

Interest expense

(2,784

)

Interest expense

158

Total

5,571

(2,784

)

158

The effects of our derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 — Derivatives and Hedging on our Consolidated Statement of Income are summarized as follows (in thousands):


					Three
		Three Months			Months
		Ended			Ended
Derivatives not Designated	AMOUNT OF GAIN OR (LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN	October 2,			October 3,
as Hedging Instruments	INCOME ON DERIVATE	2009			2008
under ASC 815	Line Item in Statements of Income	Amount			Amount
Interest rate derivatives	Other (loss)/ income, net	$	(319	)	$	—


Total		$	(319	)	$	—


		Six Months			Six Months
		Ended			Ended
Derivatives not Designated	AMOUNT OF GAIN OR (LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN	October 2,			October 3,
as Hedging Instruments	INCOME ON DERIVATE	2009			2008
under ASC 815	Line Item in Statements of Income	Amount			Amount
Interest rate derivatives	Other (loss)/ income, net	$	(506	)	$	(404	)


Total		$	(506	)	$	(404	)

As of October 2, 2009, we estimate that approximately $5.0 million of losses associated with the interest rate swap related to $168.6 million of notional debt included in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings over the remaining life of the derivative which expires in May 2010. The other interest rate swap does not qualify for hedge accounting and has been marked to market, which generated a $1.0 million liability at October 2, 2009. See Note 14 for fair value disclosures associated with these hedges.

Note 8—Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

We have operating leases for the use of real estate and certain property and equipment which are either non-cancelable, cancelable only by the payment of penalties or cancelable upon one month’s notice. All lease payments are based on the lapse of time but include, in some cases, payments for insurance, maintenance and property taxes. There are no purchase options on operating leases at favorable terms, but most leases have one or more renewal options. Certain leases on real estate are subject to annual escalations for increases in base rents, utilities and property taxes. Lease rental expense amounted to $1312.12 million and $1310.71 million for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarters~~ months ended October 2, ~~July~~2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, and $25.4 million and $23.8 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 and ~~July~~October 43, 2008, respectively.

General Legal Matters

We are involved in various lawsuits and claims that have arisen in the normal course of business. In most cases, we have denied, or believe we have a basis to deny any liability. Related to these matters, we have recorded a reserve of approximately $1821.53 million as of ~~July~~October 32, 2009. While it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of litigation and other matters discussed below, we believe that liabilities in excess of those recorded, if any, arising from such matters would not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, consolidated financial condition or liquidity over the long -term.

We have identified certain payments made to expedite the issuance of a limited number of visas and licenses from foreign government agencies that may raise compliance issues under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The payments, which we believe totaled approximately $300,000 in the aggregate, were made to sub-contractors in connection with servicing a single existing task order that the Company has with a U.S. government agency. We have retained outside counsel to investigate these payments. We are in the process of evaluating our internal policies and procedures and are committed to improving our compliance procedures. During the past week, we voluntarily brought these matters to the attention of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission. We cannot predict the ultimate consequences of these matters at this time, nor can we reasonably estimate the potential liability, if any, related to these matters. However, based on the facts currently known, we do not believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow. We have not recorded any reserves with respect to this matter.

Pending litigation and claims

On May 14, 2008, a jury in the Eastern District of Virginia found against us in a case brought by a former subcontractor, Worldwide Network Services (“WWNS”), on two Department of State (“DoS”) contracts, in which WWNS alleged racial discrimination, tortuous interference and certain other claims. The jury awarded WWNS approximately $15.7 million in compensatory and punitive damages and awarded us approximately $~~200,000~~0.2 million on a counterclaim. In addition to the jury award, the court awarded WWNS approximately $3.0 million in connection with certain contract claims. On September 22, 2008, WWNS was awarded approximately $1.8 million in attorneys’ fees. On February 2, 2009, we filed an appeal with respect to this matter. On September 22, 2009, the Court of Appeals heard oral arguments. As of ~~July~~October 32, 2009, we believe we have adequate reserves recorded for this matter.

On ~~April~~December 244, ~~2007~~2006, ~~March~~December 1429, ~~2007~~2006, ~~December~~March 2914, ~~2006~~2007 and ~~December~~April 424, ~~2006~~2007, four lawsuits were served, seeking unspecified monetary damages against the Company and several of its former affiliates in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, concerning the spraying of narcotic plant crops along the Colombian border adjacent to Ecuador. Three of the lawsuits, filed on behalf of the Provinces of Esmeraldas, Sucumbíos, and Carchi in Ecuador, allege violations of Ecuadorian law, international law, and statutory and common law tort violations, including negligence, trespass, and nuisance. The fourth lawsuit, filed on behalf of citizens of the Ecuadorian provinces of Esmeraldas and Sucumbíos, alleges personal injury, various counts of negligence, trespass, battery, assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violations of the Alien Tort Claims Act, and various violations of international law. The four lawsuits were consolidated, and based on our motion granted by the court, the case was subsequently transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. On March 26, 2008, a First Amended Consolidated Complaint was filed that identified 3,266 individual plaintiffs. The amended complaint does not demand any specific monetary damages; however, a court decision against us, although we believe to be remote, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The aerial spraying operations were and continue to be managed by us under a DoS contract in cooperation with the Colombian government. The DoS contract provides indemnification to us against third-party liabilities arising out of the contract, subject to available funding. The DoS has reimbursed us for all legal expenses to date.

A lawsuit filed on September 11, 2001, and amended on March 24, 2008, seeking unspecified damages on behalf of twenty-six residents of the Sucumbíos Province in Ecuador, was brought against us and several of our former affiliates in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The action alleges violations of the laws of nations and United States treaties, negligence, emotional distress, nuisance, battery, trespass, strict liability, and medical monitoring arising from the spraying of herbicides near the Ecuador-Colombia border in connection with the performance of the DoS, International Narcotics and Law Enforcement contract for the eradication of narcotic plant crops in Colombia. The terms of the DoS contract provide that the DoS will indemnify us against third-party liabilities arising out of the contract, subject to available funding. The DoS has reimbursed us for all legal expenses to date. We are also entitled to indemnification by Computer Sciences Corporation in connection with this lawsuit, subject to certain limitations. Additionally, any damage award would have to be apportioned between the other defendants and us. We believe that the likelihood of an unfavorable judgment in this matter is remote and that, even if that were to occur, the judgment is unlikely to result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition as a result of the third party indemnification and apportionment of damages described above.

1619

Arising out of the litigation described in the preceding two paragraphs, we filed a separate lawsuit against our aviation insurance carriers seeking defense and coverage of the referenced claims. The carriers filed a lawsuit against us on February 5, 2009 seeking rescission of certain aviation insurance policies based on an alleged misrepresentation by us concerning the existence of certain of the lawsuits relating to the eradication of narcotic plant crops.

U.S. Government Investigations

We also are occasionally the subject of investigations by various agencies of the U.S. government. Such investigations, whether related to our U.S. government contracts or conducted for other reasons, could result in administrative, civil or criminal liabilities, including repayments, fines or penalties being imposed upon us, or could lead to suspension or debarment from future U.S. government contracting.

On January 30, 2007, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (“SIGIR”) issued a report on one of our task orders concerning the Iraqi Police Training Program. Among other items, the report raises questions about our work to establish a residential camp in Baghdad to house training personnel. Specifically, the SIGIR report recommends that the DoS seek reimbursement ~~from us~~ of $4.2 million paid by the DoS to us for work that the SIGIR maintains was not contractually authorized. In addition, the SIGIR report recommends that the DoS request the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) to review two of our invoices totaling $19.1 million. On June 28, 2007, we received a letter from the DoS contracting officer requesting our repayment of approximately $4.0 million for work performed under this task order, which the letter claims was unauthorized. We responded to the DoS contracting officer in letters dated July 7, 2007 and September 4, 2007, explaining that the work for which we were paid by DoS was appropriately performed and denying DoS’ request for repayment of approximately $4.0 million. By letter dated April 30, 2008, the DoS contracting officer responded to our July 7, 2007 and September 4, 2007 correspondence by taking exception to the explanation set forth in our letters and reasserting the DoS’ request for a refund of approximately $4.0 million. On May 8, 2008, we replied to the DoS letter dated April 30, 2008 and provided additional support for our position.

On September 17, 2008, the U.S. Department of State Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) served us with a records subpoena for the production of documents relating to our Civilian Police Program in Iraq. Among other items, the subpoena seeks documents relating to our business dealings with a former subcontractor, Corporate Bank. We ~~are~~have been cooperating with the OIG’s investigation. ~~and~~In October 2009, ~~based~~we ~~on information~~were ~~currently~~notified ~~known~~by tothe ~~management,~~Department doof ~~not~~Justice ~~believe~~that this ~~matter~~investigation ~~will~~is ~~have~~being done in connection with a ~~material~~qui ~~adverse~~tam litigation brought by a private individual on behalf of the U.S. ~~effect~~government. The subject matter of this litigation is still under seal; therefore, we cannot assess its effects on our operating performance.

U.S. Government Audits

Our contracts are regularly audited by the DCAA and other government agencies. These agencies review our contract performance, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of, and our compliance with, our internal control systems and policies, including our purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed. In addition, government contract payments received by us for allowable direct and indirect costs are subject to adjustment after audit by government auditors and repayment to the government if the payments exceed allowable costs as defined in the government contracts.

The Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) formally notified us of non-compliance with Cost Accounting Standard 403, Allocation of Home Office Expenses to Segments, on April 11, 2007. We issued a response to the DCMA on April 26, 2007 with a proposed solution to resolve the area of non-compliance, which related to the allocation of corporate general and administrative costs between our divisions. On August 13, 2007, the DCMA notified us that additional information would be necessary to justify the proposed solution. We issued responses on September 17, 2007, ~~and~~ April 28, 2008 and September 10, 2009 and the matter is pending resolution. Based on facts currently known, we do not believe the matters described in this and the preceding paragraph will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

1720

We are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for employment taxes covering the calendar years 2005 through 2007. In the course of the audit process, the IRS has questioned our treatment of exempting from U.S. employment taxes all U.S. residents working abroad for a foreign subsidiary. While we believe our treatment with respect to employment taxes, for these employees, was appropriate, a negative outcome on this matter could result in a potential liability, including penalties, of approximately $113.8 million related to these calendar years.

Contract Matters

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 we terminated for cause a contract to build the Akwa Ibom International Airport for the State of Akwa Ibom in Nigeria. Consequently, we terminated certain subcontracts and purchase orders the customer advised us it did not want to assume. Based on our experience with this particular Nigerian state government customer, we believe it ~~likely~~is ~~the~~likely the customer will challenge our termination of the contract for cause and initiate legal action ~~against~~ against us. Our termination of certain subcontracts not assumed by the customer, including our actions to recover against advance payment and performance guarantees established by the subcontractors for our benefit is being challenged in certain instances. Although we believe our right to terminate this contract and such subcontracts was justified and permissible under the terms of the contracts, and we intend to rigorously contest any claims brought against us arising out of such terminations, if courts were to conclude that we were not entitled to terminate one or more of the contracts and damages were assessed against us, such damages could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Note 9—Equity-Based Compensation

As of ~~July~~October 32, 2009, our Parent had ~~provided~~outstanding equity-based compensation through the grant of of Class B interests in DIV Holding LLC, the ~~majority~~largest holder of our Parent’s common stock and ~~the~~have ~~grant~~granted of restricted stock units ~~(“RSUs”)~~ and performance stock units ~~(“PSUs”)~~ under our Parent’s 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). All of our equity-based compensation is accounted for under ~~SFAS~~ASC 718 ~~No. 123(R),~~— ~~“Share~~Compensation-~~Based~~Stock ~~Payment”~~Compensation. Under this method, we recorded equity-based ~~compensation~~ compensation expense of $01.93 million and a$1.4 million ~~credit~~for ofthe (three months ended October 2, 2009 and October 3, 2008, respectively, and $02.8)2 million and $1.2 million for the ~~quarters~~six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and ~~July~~ October 43, 2008, respectively.

Class B Equity

During the ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarter~~months ended October 2, 2009, our Parent had no new grants but; had one forfeiture event in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Consequently, the fiscal year to date expenses recognized were the result of the quarterly amortization from the graded vesting schedule, partially offset by the impact of the forfeited ~~shares~~class B interests.

A summary of Class B activity during the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal year 2010 is as follows:

	% Interest in			Grant Date
	DIV Holding			Fair Value
Balance April 3, 2009		4.71	%	$	9,669
First quarter fiscal year 2010 grants		0.00	%		—
First quarter fiscal year 2010 forfeitures		(0.03	%)		(37	)
Balance July 3, 2009		4.68	%	$	9,632
Second quarter fiscal year 2010 forfeitures		0.0	%		—
Balance October 2, 2009		4.68	%	$	9,632
April 3, 2009 vested		3.69	%	$	6,950
First quarter fiscal year 2010 vesting		0.04	%		174
July 3, 2009 vested		3.73	%	$	7,124
Second quarter fiscal year 2010 vesting		0.05	%		73
October 2, 2009 vested		3.78	%	$	7,197
April 3, 2009 nonvested		1.02	%	$	2,718
July 3, 2009 nonvested		0.95	%	$	2,508
October 2, 2009 nonvested		0.90	%	$	2,436

~~Assuming each grant outstanding, net of estimated forfeitures, as of July 3, 2009 fully vest,~~21 ~~we will recognize the related non-cash compensation expense as follows (in thousands):~~

Nine month period ending April 2, 2010	$	438
Fiscal year ending April 1, 2011		229
Fiscal year ending March 30, 2012 and thereafter		62
Total	$	729

~~Restricted~~Assuming ~~Stock~~each ~~Units~~grant outstanding, net of estimated forfeitures, as of October 2, 2009 fully vests, we will recognize the related non-cash compensation expense as follows (in thousands):

Our RSUs vest based on the passage of time and our PSUs vest based on the achievement of performance criteria. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, our Parent had no RSU grants. However, our Parent issued 12,500 PSUs to our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) as a result of fiscal year 2009 performance, with one third vesting on his employment anniversary date in fiscal year 2010, fiscal year 2011 and fiscal year 2012. During the first quarter ended July 3, 2009, 37,500 RSU awards vested but were not settled as of July 3, 2009.


Six month period ending April 2, 2010	$	259
Fiscal year ending April 1, 2011		229
Fiscal year ending March 30, 2012 and thereafter		62

Total	$	550

InRestricted ~~accordance~~Stock ~~with~~Units ~~SFAS No. 123(R)~~ and ~~our~~Performance ~~policy,~~Stock ~~we recognize compensation expense~~Units related to the RSUs and PSUs on a graded schedule over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Compensation expense related to RSUs and PSUs was approximately $0.7 million for the quarter ended July 3, 2009. Additionally, all RSUs and PSUs have been determined to be liability awards; therefore, the fair value of the RSUs and PSUs are re-measured at each financial reporting date as long as they remain liability awards. The estimated fair value of the RSUs and PSUs was approximately $5.3 million, net of forfeitures, based on the closing market price of our Parent’s common stock on the grant date. The estimated fair value of all RSUs and PSUs, net of forfeitures, was approximately $5.1 million based on the closing market price of our Parent’s common stock on July 3, 2009.

AOur ~~summary~~RSUs ofvest based on the ~~combined~~passage ~~RSU~~of time and ~~PSU~~our ~~activity~~PSUs ~~during~~vest based on the achievement of performance criteria. During the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal year 2010, isour Parent had 510,350 RSU and PSU grants. Additionally, our Parent issued 12,500 RSUs to our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) as ~~follows:~~a result of fiscal year 2009 performance, with one third vesting on his employment anniversary date in fiscal year 2010, fiscal year 2011 and fiscal year 2012.

				Weighted
	Outstanding			Average
	Restricted			Grant Date
	Stock Units			Fair Value
Outstanding, April 3, 2009		345,895		$	16.71
Units granted		12,500			13.86
Units forfeited		(40,300	)		16.32
Units vested and settled(1)		—			—
Outstanding, July 3, 2009		318,095		$	16.65

During the six months ended October 2, 2009, 37,500 RSU vested awards held by our CEO were settled by issuing 21,675 shares of our Parent’s common stock, net of payroll withholding, with a value of $0.3 million.

~~(1)~~ During the ~~first~~six ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 2, 32009, one of our consolidated joint ventures, DIFZ, in which we have a 50% ownership interest, established a 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “DIFZ Plan”). Under the DIFZ Plan, 37the joint venture can issue equity based awards to its employees. Although these awards are only paid in cash,~~600~~ ~~RSU~~the value of these awards ~~vested~~is ~~but~~tied ~~were~~to ~~not~~our ~~settled~~Parent’s common stock. As such, these awards qualify as equity-based compensation under ASC 718. As of ~~July~~the six 3months ended October 2, 2009, the liabilities and expenses associated with the DIFZ Plan were not material.

~~Assuming~~In ~~each~~accordance ~~grant~~with ~~outstanding~~ASC as718 ofand ~~July 3~~our policy, ~~2009~~we recognize compensation expense related to the RSUs and PSUs on a graded schedule over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Compensation expense related to RSUs and PSUs was approximately $1.1 million for the three months ended October 2, ~~fully~~2009, ~~vests~~and approximately $1.8 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009. weAdditionally, ~~will~~all ~~recognize~~RSUs ~~the~~and ~~related~~PSUs ~~equity-based~~have ~~compensation~~been ~~expense~~determined asto ~~follows~~be ~~based~~liability onawards; therefore, the fair value of ~~these~~ the RSUs and PSUs are re-measured at each financial reporting date as long as they remain liability awards. The estimated fair value of the RSUs and PSUs outstanding as of ~~July~~October 32, 2009, was ~~(in~~approximately ~~thousands):~~$13.0 million excluding the impact of estimated future forfeitures based on the closing market price of our Parent’s common stock on the grant date and was approximately $13.6 million excluding the impact of estimated future forfeitures based on the closing market price of our Parent’s common stock on October 2, 2009.

Nine month period ended April 2, 2010	$	1,208
Fiscal year ended April 1, 2011		1,037
Fiscal year ended March 30, 2012 and thereafter		413
Total	$	2,658

A summary of the combined RSU and PSU activity during the six months of fiscal year 2010 is as follows:

Note 10—Consolidating Financial Statements of Subsidiary Guarantors


				Weighted
				Average
	Outstanding			Grant
	Restricted			Date
	Stock Units			Fair Value

Outstanding, April 3, 2009		345,895		$	16.71
Units granted		510,350		$	16.89
Units forfeited		(48,170	)	$	16.40
Units vested and settled⁽¹⁾		(37,500	)	$	15.74

Outstanding, October 2, 2009		770,575		$	16.90

As(1) ofDuring ~~July 3,~~the ~~2009,~~six wemonths ~~had~~ended ~~outstanding~~October ~~$389.7 million~~2, ~~aggregate principal amount of 9.5% senior subordinated notes due 2013~~2009, ~~net of unamortized discount. These senior subordinated notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed~~23,375 ~~jointly~~RSU ~~and severally~~awards, onwith a ~~senior~~value ~~subordinated unsecured~~of ~~basis~~$0.4 ~~by our following subsidiaries: DTS Aviation Services LLC~~million, ~~DynCorp~~vested ~~Aerospace Operations~~but ~~LLC,~~were ~~DynCorp~~not ~~International~~settled ~~Services~~as ~~LLC, Dyn Marine Services LLC, Dyn Marine Services~~ of ~~Virginia~~ ~~LLC,~~October ~~Global Linguist Solutions LLC~~2, ~~Services~~2009. ~~International~~We ~~LLC,~~expect ~~Worldwide~~to ~~Humanitarian Services~~settle ~~LLC~~these ~~and~~shares ~~Worldwide~~infiscal ~~Recruiting~~year ~~and Staffing Services LLC~~2010.

19Assuming each grant outstanding as of October 2, 2009, net of estimated forfeitures, fully vests, we will recognize the related equity-based compensation expense as follows based on the value of these liability awards based on our Parent’s closing stock price on October 2, 2009 (in thousands):


Six month fiscal period ended April 2, 2010	$	2,217
Fiscal year ended April 1, 2011		3,846
Fiscal year ended March 30, 2012 and thereafter		4,619

Total	$	10,682

Note 10— Consolidating Financial Statements of Subsidiary Guarantors

As of October 2, 2009, we had outstanding $375.4 million aggregate principal amount of 9.5% senior subordinated notes due 2013, net of unamortized discount. These senior subordinated notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior subordinated unsecured basis by our following subsidiaries: DTS Aviation Services LLC, DynCorp Aerospace Operations LLC, DynCorp International Services LLC, Dyn Marine Services LLC, Dyn Marine Services of Virginia LLC, Global Linguist Solutions LLC, Services International LLC, Worldwide Humanitarian Services LLC and Worldwide Recruiting and Staffing Services LLC, DI Aerospace Integrated Solutions LLC and DI Air Columbia SAS.

The following supplemental consolidating financial statements present:

1. Unaudited condensed consolidating balance sheets as of ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3. 2009 ~~and~~ and the related unaudited condensed consolidating statements of operations, ~~and~~ statements of cash ~~flows~~ flows for the fiscal quarters ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and ~~July~~October 43, 2008.

2. LLC, the combined subsidiary guarantors and the combined subsidiary non-guarantors account for their investments in subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting; therefore, the LLC column reflects the equity income (loss) of its subsidiary guarantors and subsidiary non-guarantors, which are also separately reflected in the stand-alone subsidiary guarantors and subsidiary non-guarantors column. Additionally, the subsidiary guarantors column reflects the equity income (loss) of its subsidiary non-guarantors, which are also separately reflected in the stand-alone subsidiary non-guarantors column.

3. Elimination entries necessary to consolidate the LLC and all of its subsidiaries.

2023

DynCorp International LLC and Subsidiaries

~~Unaudited~~ Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations Information For the ~~Fiscal~~Three ~~Quarter~~Months Ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009

				Subsidiary			Subsidiary
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantors			Elimination			Consolidated
	LLC			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue	$	~~540~~572,~~372~~352		$	~~244~~249,~~806~~019		$	~~100~~103,~~245~~637		$	(~~100~~103,~~246~~636	)	$	~~785~~821,~~177~~372
Cost of services		(~~470~~502,~~138~~467	)		(~~229~~225,~~966~~816	)		(99102,~~235~~632	)		~~100~~103,~~246~~636			(~~699~~727,~~093~~279	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(2120,~~719~~766	)		(110,~~586~~325	)		(~~133~~213	)		—			(2331,~~438~~304	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(10,~~128~~222	)		(1—	)		(16	)		—			(10,~~145~~238	)
Operating income		38,~~387~~897			1312,~~253~~878			~~861~~776			—			52,~~501~~551
Interest expense		(1412,~~162~~939	)		(~~448~~752	)		—			—			(1413,~~610~~691	)
Earnings from affiliates		1,054			—			—			—			1,054
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(162	)		—			—			—			(162	)
Equity in income of subsidiaries		5,049			24			—			(5,073	)		—
Earnings from affiliates		1,527			—			—			—			1,527
Interest income		(113	)		448			4			—			339
Equity in income of subsidiaries		4,306			67			—			(4,373	)		—
Other, net		(125	)		(15	)		(73	)		—			(213	)
Interest income		(650	)		753			—			—			103
Income before income taxes		30,090			13,262			792			(5,073	)		39,071
Other, net		26			3			(41	)		—			(12	)
Provision for income taxes		(9,445	)		(2,860	)		(322	)		—			(12,627	)
Income before income taxes		31,005			12,949			735			(4,373	)		40,316
Net income		20,645			10,402			470			(5,073	)		26,444
Provision for income taxes		(10,450	)		(2,533	)		(318	)		—			(13,301	)
Noncontrolling interests		—			(5,135	)		(664	)		—			(5,799	)
Net income		20,555			10,416			417			(4,373	)		27,015
Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	20,645		$	5,267		$	(194	)	$	(5,073	)	$	20,645
Noncontrolling interests		—			(5,782	)		(678	)		—			(6,460	)
Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	20,555		$	4,634		$	(261	)	$	(4,373	)	$	20,555

DynCorp International LLC and Subsidiaries

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating ~~Statement~~Statements of Operations Information For the ~~Fiscal~~Three ~~Quarter~~Months Ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008

				Subsidiary			Subsidiary
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
(Amounts in thousands)	LLC			Guarantor			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue	$	520,815		$	258,336		$	98,780		$	(98,780	)	$	779,151
Revenue	$	542,958		$	173,836		$	96,688		$	(96,688	)	$	716,794
Cost of services		(471,107	)		(231,331	)		(92,861	)		98,780			(696,519	)
Cost of services		(474,553	)		(166,119	)		(94,405	)		96,688			(638,389	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(19,053	)		(6,750	)		(191	)		—			(25,994	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(22,126	)		(5,499	)		(226	)		—			(27,851	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(9,989	)		—			(16	)		—			(10,005	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(10,525	)		—			(35	)		—			(10,560	)
Operating income		20,666			20,255			5,712			—			46,633
Operating income		35,754			2,218			2,022			—			39,994
Interest expense		(14,905	)		—			—			—			(14,905	)
Interest expense		(14,215	)		—			—			—			(14,215	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(4,443	)		—			—			—			(4,443	)
Earnings from affiliates		1,~~117~~523			—			—			—			1,~~117~~523
Equity in income of subsidiaries		3,367			(106	)		—			(3,261	)		—
Equity in income of subsidiaries, net of tax		15,311			(44	)		—			(15,267	)		—
Interest income		~~331~~672			6—			75			—			~~344~~677
Other, net		~~600~~804			~~110~~46			(5110	)		—			~~705~~960
Income before income taxes		2619,~~954~~628			220,~~228~~257			25,~~024~~827			(315,~~261~~267	)		2730,~~945~~445
Provision for income taxes		(86,~~974~~757	)		—(912	)		(~~342~~1,462	)		—			(9,~~316~~131	)
Net income		1712,~~980~~871			219,~~228~~345			14,~~682~~365			(315,~~261~~267	)		1821,~~629~~314
Noncontrolling interests		—			(~~649~~7,813	)		—(630	)		—			(~~649~~8,443	)
Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	1712,~~980~~871		$	111,~~579~~532		$	13,~~682~~735		$	(315,~~261~~267	)	$	1712,~~980~~871

2224

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations Information
For the Six Months Ended October 2, 2009


				Subsidiary			Subsidiary
	LLC			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue	$	1,112,724		$	493,825		$	203,882		$	(203,882	)	$	1,606,549
Cost of services		(972,605	)		(455,782	)		(201,867	)		203,882			(1,426,372	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(42,485	)		(11,911	)		(346	)		—			(54,742	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(20,350	)		(1	)		(32	)		—			(20,383	)

Operating income		77,284			26,131			1,637			—			105,052
Interest expense		(27,101	)		(1,200	)		—			—			(28,301	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(146	)		—			—			—			(146	)
Earnings from affiliates		2,581			—			—			—			2,581
Equity in income of subsidiaries		9,355			91			—			(9,446	)		—
Interest income		(763	)		1,201			4			—			442
Other, net		(115	)		(12	)		(114	)		—			(241	)

Income before income taxes		61,095			26,211			1,527			(9,446	)		79,387
Provision for income taxes		(19,895	)		(5,393	)		(640	)		—			(25,928	)

Net income		41,200			20,818			887			(9,446	)		53,459
Noncontrolling interests		—			(10,917	)		(1,342	)		—			(12,259	)

Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	41,200		$	9,901		$	(455	)	$	(9,446	)	$	41,200

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations Information
For the Six Months Ended October 3, 2008


				Subsidiary			Subsidiary
(Amounts in thousands)	LLC			Guarantor			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

Revenue	$	1,063,773		$	432,172		$	195,468		$	(195,468	)	$	1,495,945
Cost of services		(945,659	)		(397,450	)		(187,267	)		195,468			(1,334,908	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(41,180	)		(12,249	)		(416	)		—			(53,845	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(20,514	)		—			(51	)		—			(20,565	)

Operating income		56,420			22,473			7,734			—			86,627
Interest expense		(29,120	)		—			—			—			(29,120	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(4,443	)		—			—			—			(4,443	)
Earnings from affiliates		2,640			—			—			—			2,640
Equity in income of subsidiaries, net of tax		18,000			(150	)		—			(17,850	)		—
Interest income		1,003			5			13			—			1,021
Other, net		1,404			156			105			—			1,665

Income before income taxes		45,904			22,484			7,852			(17,850	)		58,390
Provision for income taxes		(15,053	)		(1,110	)		(2,284	)		—			(18,447	)

Net income		30,851			21,374			5,568			(17,850	)		39,943
Noncontrolling interests		—			(8,462	)		(630	)		—			(9,092	)

Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	30,851		$	12,912		$	4,938		$	(17,850	)	$	30,851

DynCorp International LLC and Subsidiaries

~~Unaudited~~ Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information ~~July~~October 32, 2009

			Subsidiary		Subsidiary
	LLC		~~Guarantors~~Guarantor		Non-Guarantors		~~Elimination~~Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~151~~123,~~447~~513	$	14,~~949~~814	$	53,~~897~~757	$	—		$	~~159~~132,~~293~~084
Restricted cash		515,~~700~~990		—		—		—			515,~~700~~990
Accounts receivable, net		~~452~~465,~~325~~234		~~184~~170,~~940~~040		21,~~205~~078		—			~~639~~636,~~470~~352
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		6977,~~266~~736		3936,~~392~~409		12,~~367~~132		—			~~110~~116,~~025~~277
Total current assets		~~678~~682,~~738~~473		~~226~~211,~~281~~263		96,~~469~~967		—			~~914~~900,~~488~~703
Property and equipment, net		1450,~~897~~849		3,~~250~~005		~~334~~312		—			1854,~~481~~166
Goodwill		398,559		21,621		—		—			420,180
Tradename		18,318		—		—		—			18,318
Other intangibles, net		~~119~~111,~~878~~491		13,~~885~~886		—					~~133~~125,~~763~~377
Investment in subsidiaries		7573,~~031~~734		~~614~~681		—		(7574,~~645~~415	)		—
Other assets, net		4039,~~301~~613		94		—		—			4039,~~395~~707
Intercompany receivables		4557,~~672~~043		—		5947,~~069~~664		(104,~~741~~707	)		—
Total assets	$	1,~~391~~432,~~394~~080	$	~~265~~250,~~745~~550	$	6854,~~872~~943	$	(~~180~~179,~~386~~122	)	$	1,~~545~~558,~~625~~451
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	—14,137	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—14,137
Accounts payable		~~101~~130,~~761~~770		9282,~~676~~496		~~1,761~~433					~~196~~213,~~198~~699
Accrued payroll and employee costs		4856,~~459~~528		2734,~~445~~162		4422,~~596~~585		—			~~120~~113,~~500~~275
Other accrued liabilities		6351,~~440~~687		4337,~~893~~057		1019,~~048~~646		—			~~117~~108,~~381~~390
Income taxes payable and deferred income taxes		14,169		23		860		—			15,052
Income taxes payable		17,887		—		656		—			18,543
Total current liabilities		~~227~~271,~~829~~009		~~164~~153,~~037~~715		5743,~~265~~320		—			~~449~~468,~~131~~044
Long-term debt, less current portion		~~566~~537,~~383~~887		—		—		—			~~566~~537,~~383~~887
Other long-term liabilities		56,~~618~~101		—		—		—			56,~~618~~101
Intercompany payables		6770,~~071~~664		3734,~~670~~043		—		(104,~~741~~707	)		—
Total equity		~~524~~546,~~493~~419		6462,~~038~~792		11,~~607~~623		(7574,~~645~~415	)		~~524~~546,~~493~~419
Total liabilities and member’s equity	$	1,~~391~~432,~~394~~080	$	~~265~~250,~~745~~550	$	6854,~~872~~943	$	(~~180~~179,~~386~~122	)	$	1,~~545~~558,~~625~~451

2326

DynCorp International LLC and Subsidiaries

~~Unaudited~~ Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information April 3, 2009

			Subsidiary		Subsidiary
	LLC		Guarantor		Non-Guarantors		Eliminations			Consolidated
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	192,968	$	2,534	$	4,720	$	—		$	200,222
Restricted cash		5,935		—		—		—			5,935
Accounts receivable, net		389,715		172,900		1,817		—			564,432
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		112,024		10,952		1,238		—			124,214
Total current assets		700,642		186,386		7,775		—			894,803
Property and equipment, net		14,582		3,400		356		—			18,338
Goodwill		398,559		21,621		—		—			420,180
Tradename		18,318		—		—		—			18,318
Other intangibles, net		128,833		13,886							142,719
Investment in subsidiaries		64,380		589		—		(64,969	)		—
Other assets, net		44,762		94		—		—			44,856
Intercompany receivables		48,786		—		43,663		(92,449	)		—
Total assets	$	1,418,862	$	225,976	$	51,794	$	(157,418	)	$	1,539,214
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	30,540	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	30,540
Accounts payable		96,574		63,132		713					160,419
Accrued payroll and employee costs		69,220		32,965		35,808		—			137,993
Other accrued liabilities		94,333		14,711		2,546		—			111,590
Income taxes payable and deferred income taxes		13,615		—		649		—			14,264
Income taxes payable		13,615		—		649		—			14,264
Total current liabilities		304,282		110,808		39,716		—			454,806
Long-term debt, less current portion		569,372		—		—		—			569,372
Other long-term liabilities		6,744		35		—		—			6,779
Intercompany payables		30,207		62,242		—		(92,449	)		—
Total equity		508,257		52,891		12,078		(64,969	)		508,257
Total liabilities and member’s equity	$	1,418,862	$	225,976	$	51,794	$	(157,418	)	$	1,539,214

2427

DynCorp International LLC and Subsidiaries

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flow Information For the ~~Fiscal~~Six ~~Quarter~~Months Ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009

				Subsidiary			Subsidiary
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
(Amounts in thousands)	LLC			Guarantor			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	(8,073	)	$	13,550		$	27,901		$	—	$	33,378
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(45,156	)	$	34,021		$	16,583		$	—	$	5,448
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(134,~~294~~687	)		—			—			—		(134,~~294~~687	)
Other investing cash flows		—(1,575	)		—			—			—		—(1,575	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(136,~~294~~262	)		—			—			—		(136,~~294~~262	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net transfers from (to) Parent		3924,~~978~~198			~~(24~~4,~~572~~001	)		(1528,~~406~~199	)		—		—
Payments on long term debt		(34,337	)		—			—			—		(34,337	)
Payments on debt		(48,626	)		—			—			—		(48,626	)
Other financing activities		(~~712~~692	)		(1015,~~034~~271	)		—(665	)		—		(1016,~~746~~628	)
Net cash used in financing activities		4(25,~~929~~120	)		(3411,~~606~~270	)		(1528,~~406~~864	)		—		(4565,~~083~~254	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(41,521	)		(585	)		1,177			—		(40,929	)
Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(69,455	)		2,280			(963	)		—		(68,138	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		192,968			2,534			4,720			—		200,222
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	~~151~~123,~~447~~513		$	14,~~949~~814		$	53,~~897~~757		$	—	$	~~159~~132,~~293~~084

Unaudited Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flow Information For the ~~Fiscal~~Six ~~Quarter~~Months Ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008

				Subsidiary			Subsidiary
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
(Amounts in thousands)	LLC			Guarantor			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
	(Dollars in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	121,387		$	(48,131	)	$	(35,303	)	$	—	$	37,953
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(32,823	)	$	(50,962	)	$	12,654		$	—	$	(71,131	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(12,~~208~~303	)		—			—			—		(12,~~208~~303	)
Other investing cash flows		(~~243~~17,415	)		—			—			—		(~~243~~17,415	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(119,~~451~~718	)		—			—			—		(119,~~451~~718	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net transfers from (to) Parent		(4085,~~890~~894	)		5048,~~139~~569			(937,~~249~~325	)		—		—
Payments on long term debt		(1,548	)		—			—			—		(1,548	)
Payments on debt		22,622			—			—			—		22,622
Other financing activities		226,~~251~~543			—			—			—		226,~~251~~543
Net cash used in financing activities		(2056,~~187~~729	)		5048,~~139~~569			(937,~~249~~325	)		—		2029,~~703~~165
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		~~(54~~44,~~461~~940	)		~~(823~~438	)		32,~~405~~022			—		~~(51~~47,~~879~~400	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		79,484			3,835			2,060			—		85,379
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	25124,~~023~~424		$	34,~~012~~273		$	54,~~465~~082		$	—	$	33132,~~500~~779

Note 11 — Related Parties, Joint Ventures and Variable Interest Entities

Management Fee

We pay Veritas Capital an annual management fee of $0.3 million plus expenses to provide us with general business management, financial, strategic and consulting services. We paid $0.12 million and $0.3 million to Veritas inCapital for the ~~quarters~~three and six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and paid ~~July~~$0.3 4million for the three and six months ended October 3, 2008.

~~Joint Ventures~~28

Amounts due from our unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $3.7 million and $2.5 million as of July 3, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively. These receivables are a result of items purchased and services rendered by us on behalf of our unconsolidated joint ventures. We have assessed these receivables as having minimal collection risk based on our historic experience with these joint ventures and our inherent influence through our ownership interest. The change in these receivables from April 3, 2009 to July 3, 2009 resulted in a use of operating cash for the quarter ended July 3, 2009 of approximately $1.2 million. The related revenue associated with our unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $1.3 million and $2.6 million for the quarters ended July 3, 2009 and July 4, 2008, respectively. Additionally, we earned $0.9 and $1.1 million in equity method income from the Babcock joint venture in the first quarter ended July 3, 2009 and the first quarter ended July 4, 2008, respectively.

AsJoint ~~a result of the DIFZ sale, we currently hold three promissory notes from Palm which had an~~Ventures initial value of $9.7 million as a result of the sales price. The notes are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and in Other assets on our consolidated balance sheet for the short and long term portions, respectively. As of July 3, 2009, the loan balance outstanding with Palm was $8.7 million, reflecting the initial value plus accrued interest, less payments against the promissory notes.

Amounts due from our unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $5.1 million and $2.5 million as of October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009, respectively. These receivables are a result of items purchased and services rendered by us on behalf of our unconsolidated joint ventures. We have assessed these receivables as having minimal collection risk based on our historic experience with these joint ventures and our inherent influence through our ownership interest. The change in these receivables from April 3, 2009 to October 2, 2009 resulted in a use of operating cash for the six months ended October 2, 2009 of approximately $2.6 million. The related revenue associated with our unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $1.3 million and $2.6 million for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively, and $11.4 million and $14.1 million for the three and six months ended and October 3, 2008, respectively. Additionally, we earned $1.1 million and $2.0 million in equity method income from the Babcock joint venture in the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively, and $1.3 million and $2.4 million in the three and six months ended October 3, 2008, respectively.

As a result of the DIFZ sale, we currently hold three promissory notes from our joint venture partner which had an initial value of $9.7 million as a result of the sales price. The notes are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and in Other assets on our consolidated balance sheet for the short and long-term portions, respectively. As of October 2, 2009, the loan balance outstanding was $8.6 million, reflecting the initial value plus accrued interest, less payments against the promissory notes.

Variable Interest Entities

Our population of variable interest entities, associated primary beneficiary assessments, ~~and~~ and our joint venture ownership percentages have not changed from the information disclosed onin our fiscal year 2009 annual report. Additionally, our Parent’s ~~controlling~~largest shareholder, Veritas Capital, continues to be the majority owner of McNeil Technologies, our GLS partner. In the aggregate, our maximum exposure to losses as a result of our investment in VIEs consists of our $9.5 million investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries as well as contingent liabilities that are neither probable nor reasonably estimable as of October 2, 2009.

GLS assets and liabilities were $~~161~~147.17 million and $~~119~~108.3.0 million at ~~July~~October 32, 2009, respectively, as compared to $~~150~~152.50 million and $129.6 million at April 3, 2009., respectively. Additionally, GLS revenue was $198.4 million and $396.7 million for the ~~quarter~~three ~~ended~~and ~~July~~six months ended October 32, 2009, respectively, as compared to $~~118~~201.43 million and $319.7 million for the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008, respectively.

DIFZ assets and liabilities were $5443.2 million and $5240.74 million, respectively, as of ~~July 3,~~October 2, 2009, as compared to $38.0 million and $36.5 million at April 3, 2009., respectively. Additionally, DIFZ revenue was $9499.64 million and $194.0 million for the ~~quarter~~three ~~ended~~and ~~July~~six months ended October 32, 2009, respectively. DIFZ revenue and costs are eliminated in consolidation.

Note 12—Collaborative Arrangement

We participate in a collaborative arrangement with two of our partners on the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (“LOGCAP IV”). The purpose of this arrangement is to share some of the risks and rewards associated with this contract. We receive working capital contributions to mitigate the risks associated with the timing of cash inflows and outflows. We also share in the profits. We account for this collaborative arrangement under ~~EITF~~ASC ~~07-1~~808 ~~“Accounting~~— ~~for~~ Collaborative Arrangements”. We record revenue gross as the prime contractor. The cash inflows, outflows, as well as expenses incurred impact cost of services in the period realized or incurred. The expenses incurred from our profit sharing arrangement were not material for the ~~quarters~~three or six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and ~~July 4~~October 3, 2008.

Note 13—Segment Information

As discussed in Note 3, we have a new organizational realignment which resulted in three new operating segments. The purpose of the realignment is to support our transition, as we become an integrated global enterprise, by more closely aligning our organization with our strategic markets and continuing to streamline our infrastructure to facilitate growth. ~~This~~We ~~new~~believe this new structure better reflects our market focus and ~~we believe~~ better positions us to achieve our goal of becoming ~~the~~ the leading global government services provider and a high-performing integrated global enterprise.

The three segments are as follows:

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions, or GSDS segment provides a diverse collection of outsourced services, primarily to government agencies worldwide. GSDS consists of the International Civilian Police Program (“CivPol”) SBA, the Security & ~~Training~~Mentoring SBA, the LOGCAP IV SBA, the Operations SBA, and the Infrastructure SBA.

Global Platform Support Solutions, or GPSS segment provides a wide range of technical, engineering, logistics and maintenance support services primarily to government agencies worldwide. Additionally, GPSS provides services including drug eradication and host nation pilot and crew training. GPSS consists of the Aviation Life Cycle Support SBA, the Domestic Aviation Operations and Support SBA, the Field Service Operations SBA, the International Aviation Operations & Support SBA, the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement (“INL Air Wing”) SBA and the Land Systems SBA.

Global Linguist Solutions, or GLS segment provides rapid recruitment, deployment and on-site management of in-theatre interpreters and translators to the U.S. military for a wide range of foreign languages. GLS consists of the linguist service line SBA.

The following is a summary of the financial information of the reportable segments reconciled to the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. All prior periods presented have been recast to reflect the new segment reporting.

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	Three Months Ended
	July 3, 2009			July 4, 2008
	October 2, 2009			October 3, 2008
Revenue
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	~~284~~336,~~085~~521		$	~~269~~263,~~554~~985
Global Platform Support Solutions		~~303~~284,~~648~~512			~~329~~315,~~736~~241
Global Linguist Solutions		198,~~354~~393			~~118~~201,~~422~~305
Other/Elimination		~~(910~~1,946	)		(~~918~~1,380	)
Total revenue	$	~~785~~821,~~177~~372		$	~~716~~779,~~794~~151
Operating Income	$	1520,~~874~~386		$	221,~~971~~036
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions
Global Platform Support Solutions		2519,~~910~~813			1528,~~742~~284
Global Linguist Solutions		1012,~~717~~352			117,~~281~~313
Total operating income	$	52,~~501~~551		$	3946,~~994~~633
Depreciation and amortization	$	4,~~940~~952		$	54,~~176~~777
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions
Global Platform Support Solutions		5,~~009~~129			5,~~238~~013
Global Linguist Solutions		~~196~~157			~~146~~215
Total depreciation and amortization	$	10,~~145~~238		$	10,~~560~~005

	As of
	Six Months Ended
	July 3, 2009		April 3, 2009
	October 2, 2009		October 3, 2008
Assets
Revenue
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	~~648~~620,~~382~~606	$	~~594~~533,~~207~~539
Global Platform Support Solutions		~~513~~588,~~705~~160		~~510~~644,~~583~~978
Global Linguist Solutions		~~161~~396,~~073~~748		~~152~~319,~~090~~727
Other/Elimination (1)		222,465		282,334
Other/Elimination		1,035		(2,299	)
Total assets	$	1,545,625	$	1,539,214
Total revenue	$	1,606,549	$	1,495,945
Operating Income	$	36,278	$	24,006
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions
Global Platform Support Solutions		45,710		44,027
Global Linguist Solutions		23,064		18,594
Total operating income	$	105,052	$	86,627
Depreciation and amortization	$	9,900	$	9,953
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions
Global Platform Support Solutions		10,168		10,250
Global Linguist Solutions		315		362
Total depreciation and amortization	$	20,383	$	20,565

~~(1) Assets primarily include cash, deferred income taxes, and deferred debt issuance cost.~~30


	As of
	October 2, 2009		April 3, 2009

Assets
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	674,551	$	594,207
Global Platform Support Solutions		533,264		510,583
Global Linguist Solutions		147,743		152,090
Corporate ⁽¹⁾		202,893		282,334

Total assets	$	1,558,451	$	1,539,214


⁽¹⁾		Corporate assets primarily include cash, deferred income taxes, and deferred debt issuance cost.

Note 14—Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

~~SFAS~~ASC ~~No. 157~~820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include:

•

Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

•

Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

•

Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

27As of October 2, 2009, we held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included cash equivalents (including restricted cash) and interest rate derivatives. Cash equivalents consist of petty cash, cash in-bank and short-term, highly liquid, income-producing investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Our interest rate derivatives, as further described in Note 7, consist of interest rate swap contracts. The fair values of the interest rate swap contracts are determined based on inputs that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. Therefore, we have categorized these interest rate swap contracts as Level 2. We have consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods presented.

Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820 at October 2, 2009, were as follows:


Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Book value of
	financial		Quoted Prices in
	assets/(liabilities)		Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	as of October 2,		for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
(amounts in thousands)	2009		Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
*Assets*
Cash equivalents⁽¹⁾	$	148,074	$	148,074	$	—	$	—

Total assets measured at fair value	$	148,074	$	148,074	$	—	$	—

*Liabilities*
Interest rate derivatives	$	6,185	$	—	$	6,185	$	—

Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	6,185	$	—	$	6,185	$	—


(1)		Includes cash equivalents and restricted cash

As of July 3, 2009, we held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included cash equivalents (including restricted cash) and interest rate derivatives. Cash equivalents consist of petty cash, cash in-bank and short-term, highly liquid, income-producing investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Our interest rate derivatives, as further described in Note 7, consist of interest rate swap contracts. The fair values of the interest rate swap contracts are determined based on inputs that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. Therefore, we have categorized these interest rate swap contracts as Level 2. We have consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods presented.

Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 157 at July 3, 2009, were as follows:

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Book value of		Quoted Prices in
	financial		Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	assets/(liabilities)		for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable
(amounts in thousands)	as of July 3, 2009		Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Cash equivalents(1)	$	164,993	$	164,993	$	—	$	—
Total assets measured at fair value	$	164,993	$	164,993	$	—	$	—
Liabilities
Interest rate derivatives	$	6,593	$	—	$	6,593	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	6,593	$	—	$	6,593	$	—

(1) Includes cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash

Note 15—Subsequent Events

We evaluated subsequent events that occurred after the period end date through ~~August~~November 612, 2009, the date the financial statements were available to be issued. We concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that require recognition on our financial statements for the ~~period~~three months or the six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009. However, we determined that the ~~two~~acquisition ~~items discussed~~of ~~below~~Phoenix Consulting Group, Inc. on October 19, 2009 merited additional disclosure.

•Business In July 2009 we completed the repurchase of an additional $14.5 million of face value of our senior subordinated notes for $14.3 million, including applicable fees. The total amount of both our Parent’s common stock and senior subordinated notes repurchased for the fiscal year totaled approximately $25 million, which is the allowable repurchase basket per our current authorization as more fully described in Note 6.Combination

•On InOctober 19, ~~July~~ 2009, we ~~obtained~~acquired a100% ~~consent~~of ~~from~~Phoenix ~~our~~Consulting ~~lenders~~Group, ~~under~~Inc ~~our~~(“Phoenix”), ~~senior~~which ~~secured~~was a ~~credit~~privately ~~facility~~held tocompany ~~allow~~based usin toArlington, ~~expand~~Virginia. ~~our~~Phoenix ~~capability~~is toa ~~purchase~~leading ~~capital~~provider ~~assets~~of intelligence bytraining, anconsultative ~~additional~~and ~~$52~~augmentation ~~million~~services ~~during~~to ~~fiscal~~a ~~year~~wide ~~2010.~~range ~~The purpose~~ of ~~obtaining~~U.S. ~~this~~government organizations. ~~consent~~The ~~was~~acquisition tobroadens ~~enable~~our usservice toofferings ~~acquire~~into ~~certain~~the ~~capital~~intelligence ~~assets~~community inwhich is ~~support~~consistent ofwith aour ~~new~~goal ~~program~~of ~~requiring~~accelerating ~~the~~growth, ~~purchase~~expanding ofservice ~~certain~~offerings ~~capital~~and ~~assets,~~penetrating ~~including helicopters~~new segments.

~~ITEM~~The 2total purchase price for Phoenix consists of a base price of approximately $46.0 million (including ~~MANAGEMENT’S~~an ~~DISCUSSION~~adjustment ~~AND~~thereto ~~ANALYSIS~~made OFat ~~FINANCIAL~~closing ~~CONDITION~~based ~~AND~~on ~~RESULTS~~estimated OFnet ~~OPERATIONS~~working capital at closing), a post-closing net working capital adjustment and a potential contingent payment ranging from zero to $5 million. The base purchase price was paid at closing and funded with cash on hand.

~~The~~Through ~~following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with~~ the ~~consolidated~~post-closing ~~financial~~net ~~statements,~~working ~~and~~capital ~~the notes thereto~~adjustment, ~~and~~we ~~other~~will ~~data~~either ~~contained~~pay ~~elsewhere~~or ~~in this Quarterly Report. The following discussion and~~receive ~~analysis~~proceeds ~~should~~based ~~also~~on bethe ~~read~~final indetermination ~~conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis~~ of ~~Financial~~net ~~Condition~~working ~~and~~capital ~~Results~~at ~~of Operations”~~closing ~~included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009. References~~ to ~~“DynCorp International”,~~ the ~~“Company”,~~extent ~~“we”,~~that ~~“our”, or “us” refer to DynCorp~~the ~~International~~amount ~~LLC~~thereof ~~and~~is ~~its~~greater ~~subsidiaries unless otherwise stated~~ or ~~indicated~~less bythan ~~context. DynCorp International Inc., our direct parent (~~the ~~“Parent”),~~estimated ~~has~~net noworking ~~operations~~capital ~~independent~~at ~~of our Company, DynCorp International LLC~~closing.

28The base purchase price and the contingent consideration exclude acquisition related costs of approximately $0.5 million, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

The acquisition will be accounted for as a business purchase pursuant to ASC 805 — Business Combinations. In accordance with ASC 805, the purchase price will be allocated to assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair value at the acquisition date. The fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date will be included in the purchase price allocation.

The goodwill arising from the acquisition consists largely of expectations that the addition of Phoenix extends our ability to deliver compelling services to the intelligence communities and national security clients. The goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

Phoenix will be incorporated into the GSDS operating segment. The assets, liabilities and results of operations are not expected to be material to our consolidated financial position or results or operations in fiscal year 2010.


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, and other data contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. The following discussion and analysis should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009. References to “DynCorp International”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us” refer to DynCorp International LLC and its subsidiaries unless otherwise stated or indicated by context. DynCorp International Inc., our direct parent (our “Parent”), has no operations independent of our Company, DynCorp International LLC.

COMPANY OVERVIEW

We are a leading provider of specialized mission-critical professional and support services for the U.S. military, non-military U.S. governmental agencies and foreign governments. Our specific global expertise is in law enforcement training and support, security services, services to the intelligence community, base and logistics operations, construction management, aviation services and operations, and ~~linguist~~ linguist services. We also provide logistics support for all our services, including those services ~~provided~~ provided under the recently-awarded LOGCAP IV contract. We have provided essential services to numerous U.S. government departments and agencies since 1951. Our current customers include the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”), the DoS, foreign governments, commercial customers and certain other U.S. federal, state and local government departments and agencies. ~~Revenue from U.S. government~~ contracts accounted for approximately 96% of our total revenue in fiscal year 2009 and we were the prime contractor on contracts representing approximately 96% of our total revenue in fiscal year 2009. As of July 3, 2009, we had over 25,100 employees in more than 30 countries, approximately 58 active contracts ranging in duration from three to ten years and 110 task orders.

~~SBAs~~Strategic &Business Areas and Service Offerings

We utilize Strategic Business Areas (“SBAs”) to manage, review, and assess our business performance at a program level. We also aggregate our SBAs into service offerings to manage our business based on what constitutes our primary lines of business. We aggregate SBAs that provide similar services and utilize similar methods to provide these services.

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions

GSDS provides a diverse collection of outsourced services primarily to government agencies worldwide. As of October 2, 2009 GSDS includes three service offerings as described below:

Security & Training — This service offering is comprised of the following SBAs:

• CivPol— This SBA provides international policing and police training, judicial support, immigration support and base operations. • Security & Training — This SBA provides senior advisors and mentors to foreign governmental agencies. In addition, it provides security and personal protection for diplomats and governmental senior officials.

•

Security & Mentoring — This SBA provides senior advisors and mentors to foreign governmental agencies. In addition, it provides security and personal protection for diplomats and governmental senior officials.

Contingency Support and Operations — This service offering is comprised of the following SBAs:

• LOGCAP IV — This SBA supports U.S. military operations and maintenance support, including but not limited to: construction services, facilities management, electrical power, water, sewage and waste management, laundry operations, food services and transportation motor pool operations. • Contingency Support & Operations — This SBA provides peace-keeping logistics support, humanitarian relief, weapons removal and abatement, worldwide contingency planning and other rapid response services. In addition, it offers inventory procurement and tracking services, property control, data entry and mobile repair services. Furthermore, this SBA provides facility and equipment maintenance and control and custodial and administrative services.

•

Contingency Support & Operations — This SBA provides peace-keeping logistics support, humanitarian relief, weapons removal and abatement, worldwide contingency planning and other rapid response services. In addition, it offers inventory procurement and tracking services, property control, data entry and mobile repair services. Furthermore, this SBA provides facility and equipment maintenance and control and custodial and administrative services.

Infrastructure — This service offering is comprised of a single SBA:

•

Infrastructure — This SBA provides civil, electrical, environmental and mechanical engineering and construction management services.

As discussed in Note 15 to our Financial Statements, we closed on the acquisition of Phoenix Consulting Group Inc, which will be consolidated within the GSDS business unit. It will operate as the fourth service offering — Intelligence Training and Solutions. Under this service offering, we will (i) provide proprietary training courses, management consulting and augmentation services to the intelligence community and (ii) expand our services to the intelligence community and national security clients.

Global Platform Support Solutions

GPSS provides a wide range of technical, engineering, logistics and maintenance support services primarily to government agencies worldwide. Additionally, GPSS provides services including drug eradication and host nation pilot and crew training. GPSS includes two service offerings as described below:

Aviation — Our Aviation service offering provides a host of services that primarily features either aircraft maintenance or aircraft operations. This includes the following SBAs:

• Aviation Life Cycle Support — Provides worldwide support of U.S. Army, Air Force and Navy fixed wing assets. Aircraft are deployed throughout the U.S., Europe, Asia, South America and the Middle East. This includes flight line and depot level maintenance consisting of scheduled and unscheduled events. Specific functions include repair, overhaul and procurement of components, and procurement of consumable materials and transportation of materials to and from the operating sites. In addition, the team is responsible for obsolescence engineering, quality control, inventory management, avionics upgrades and recovery of downed aircraft. • Domestic Aviation Operations and Support — Provides aircraft fleet maintenance and modification services, ground vehicle maintenance and modification services, pilot and maintenance training, logistics support, air traffic control services, base and depot operations, program management and engineering services. Additionally, this SBA provides aerial firefighting services. These services are provided in the U.S. • Field Service Operations — Provides worldwide maintenance, modification, repair, and logistics support on aircraft, weapons systems, and related support equipment to the DoD and other U.S. government agencies. Contract Field Teams (“CFT”) is the most significant program in our Field Service Operations SBA. Our Company and its predecessors have provided CFT services for over 58 years. This program deploys highly mobile, quick-response field teams to customer locations to supplement a customer’s workforce. • International Aviation Operations and Support — Provides aircraft fleet maintenance and modification services, ground vehicle maintenance and modification services, pilot and maintenance training, logistics support, air traffic control services, air transportation, base and depot operations, program management and engineering services. These services are provided internationally. • INL Air Wing — Conducts foreign assistance programs to reduce the flow of international narcotics.

•

Domestic Aviation Operations and Support — Provides aircraft fleet maintenance and modification services, ground vehicle maintenance and modification services, pilot and maintenance training, logistics support, air traffic control services, base and depot operations, program management and engineering services. Additionally, this SBA provides aerial firefighting services. These services are provided in the U.S.

•

Field Service Operations — Provides worldwide maintenance, modification, repair, and logistics support on aircraft, weapons systems, and related support equipment to the DoD and other U.S. government agencies. Contract Field Teams (“CFT”) is the most significant program in our Field Service Operations SBA. Our Company and its predecessors have provided CFT services for over 58 years. This program deploys highly mobile, quick-response field teams to customer locations to supplement a customer’s workforce.

•

International Aviation Operations and Support — Provides aircraft fleet maintenance and modification services, ground vehicle maintenance and modification services, pilot and maintenance training, logistics support, air traffic control services, air transportation, base and depot operations, program management and engineering services. These services are provided internationally.

•

INL Air Wing — Conducts foreign assistance programs to reduce the flow of international narcotics.

Land Systems — This service offering is comprised of a single SBA:

•

Land Systems — This SBA provides maintenance, operations, support, life extension, engineering, marine services and program management services primarily for ground vehicles and docked ships. This includes the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles Logistics Support (“MRAP”) contract.

Global Linguist Solutions

Global Linguist Solutions — This consolidated joint venture between DynCorp International ~~and~~LLC and McNeil Technologies provides rapid recruitment, deployment and on-site management of in-theatre interpreters and translators to the U.S. military for a wide range of foreign languages. Our GLS operating segment is comprised of a single linguist service offering/SBA.

CURRENT OPERATING CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK

~~External~~There ~~Factors~~have been no material changes to the Company’s industry outlook, economic conditions, or internal strategy from those disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended July 3, 2009.

~~Over~~Notable ~~most~~Events ~~of the last two decades, the U.S. government has increased its reliance on the private sector~~ for ~~a wide range of professional and support services. This increased use of contractors to augment non-combat forces during conflict operations by~~ the ~~U.S.~~six ~~government~~months ~~has~~ended ~~been driven~~October 2, ~~by a variety of factors including: lean-government initiatives launched in the 1990s; surges~~2009 in demand during times of national crisis; the increased complexity of missions conducted by the U.S. military and the DoS; increased focus of the U.S. military on war-fighting efforts; and the loss of skills within the government caused by workforce reductions and retirements.

30 • LOGCAP IV task order in southern Afghanistan with an estimated value of approximately $600 million was awarded in July 2009 and began ramp-up activities in September 2009.

•

In September 2009, we were awarded a contract by the U.S. Air Force to provide aircraft maintenance support at Sheppard Air Force Base. The value of the contract is $31.2 million for the base period, and a potential maximum value of $230 million over seven years, if all options are exercised.

In• ~~the~~We ~~current~~were ~~environment~~awarded ofa ~~economic~~Worldwide ~~uncertainty~~Personal ~~and~~Protective ~~market~~Services ~~turmoil,~~(“WPPS”) ~~developing~~task ~~and implementing~~order ~~spending,~~that ~~tax,~~was ~~and~~originally ~~other~~expected ~~initiatives~~ to ~~stimulate~~ramp ~~the~~up ~~faltering~~in ~~economy~~the ~~are~~second atquarter ~~the forefront~~ of ~~the~~fiscal ~~U.S.~~year ~~government’s activities. While we expect to see continued support for defense initiatives under the Obama Administration~~2010, webut ~~expect~~due ~~that initiatives~~ to ~~address economic~~changes ~~stimulus~~in ~~will~~customer ~~compete~~requirements ~~with~~was ~~other national priorities, such as DoD and DoS initiatives~~delayed. ~~While~~Our ~~these~~current ~~dynamics~~expectation ~~will~~is ~~place~~that ~~pressure on defense spending,~~ we ~~believe that, within the defense budget, weapon system acquisitions~~ will bebegin ~~the~~performance ~~most~~on ~~likely~~this ~~initial~~program ~~target for budget reductions, and operations and maintenance budgets will remain robust, driven~~ by ~~(i)~~ the ~~need~~fourth ~~to reset~~fiscal ~~equipment~~quarter ~~coming out~~ of ~~Iraq, (ii) the logistics and support chain associated with repositioning of forces and the draw down in Iraq and (iii) deployments into Afghanistan~~2010.

~~There~~• isDuring ~~increasing~~the ~~indication~~second byquarter, ~~the~~we ~~Obama~~made ~~administration~~a ofdecision ato ~~desire~~purchase ~~for~~helicopters ~~the~~in ~~U.S.~~support ~~government to~~of ~~move~~our ~~away~~new ~~from~~WPPS ~~private~~air ~~contractors~~services ~~and~~task ~~utilize~~order. ~~military~~Given oravailability ~~government~~of ~~personnel~~customer inassets ~~performing~~ to support ~~services~~this ~~throughout~~program, ~~the~~we ~~federal~~mutually ~~government.~~agreed ~~This~~to ~~“insourcing”~~a oftask ~~previously~~order ~~contracted support~~modification ~~services~~under ~~could~~which ~~diminish~~ the ~~U.S.~~customer ~~government’s~~will ~~reliance~~now onsupply ~~private~~its ~~contractors~~own ~~in the future~~helicopters. ~~While~~As a result, we ~~continue~~plan to ~~monitor~~utilize ~~this~~all ~~trend~~but ~~going~~three ~~forward,~~of wethe dopurchased ~~not~~helicopter ~~believe~~assets ~~that~~on ~~insourcing will~~other ~~have~~programs, asome ~~material~~of ~~impact~~which tomay ~~our~~be ~~operations~~structured incost-reimbursable ~~the~~instead ~~near~~of ~~term~~fixed priced. We ~~believe~~plan ~~the~~to ~~following~~sell ~~industry trends~~the ~~will~~three ~~result~~helicopters inthat ~~continued~~we ~~strong~~do ~~demand~~not inintend ~~our~~to ~~target~~use ~~markets~~on ~~for~~ the ~~types~~other ~~of services we provide:~~ programs.

• ~~The~~We ~~continued~~continue ~~use of contractors~~ to ~~augment~~encounter ~~non-combat~~cost ~~forces~~overruns ~~during~~in ~~conflict~~our ~~operations,~~Afghanistan ~~including~~construction ~~personnel support~~projects, ~~base~~within ~~operations~~our ~~and~~infrastructure ~~logistics,~~service ~~platform support and maintenance~~offering, ~~and contingency operations~~ due to ~~increased~~significant ~~military~~challenges ~~operational~~including ~~tempo, equipment service life extensions and economic pressures on~~ the ~~DoD~~deteriorating ~~budget;~~security •situation ~~Increased use of contractor support~~ in ~~post-conflict~~and ~~rebuilding~~issues ~~efforts,~~with ~~including~~getting ~~military logistics and~~ equipment ~~reset~~through ~~support,~~customs ~~infrastructure~~in ~~development,~~Afghanistan. ~~training~~Fiscal ~~and~~year ~~mentoring,~~2010 ~~and~~second ~~capacity~~quarter ~~building;~~results •included ~~Increased~~a ~~outsourcing~~loss byon ~~foreign~~Afghanistan ~~militaries~~construction of ~~maintenance,~~$5.3 ~~supply~~million. ~~support,~~We ~~facilities~~expect ~~management~~that ~~and~~our ~~construction~~firm ~~management~~fixed-~~related~~price ~~services;~~Afghanistan ~~and~~construction •contracts ~~The~~will ~~shift~~continue ~~from~~to ~~single~~operate ~~award~~at toa ~~more~~loss ~~multiple~~or ~~award~~at ~~indefinite~~margins ~~order~~approaching ~~indefinite~~zero ~~quantity~~over ~~(“IDIQ”)~~the ~~contracts,~~contract ~~which~~terms. ~~may~~Accordingly, ~~offer~~we usdo annot ~~opportunity~~expect to ~~increase~~bid ~~revenue~~any ~~under~~similar ~~these~~firm fixed-price contracts bywithout ~~competing~~revised ~~for~~terms ~~task~~and ~~orders with the other contract awardees~~conditions.

~~Both~~• ~~the~~On ~~U.S. and Iraqi governments have recently communicated~~ the ~~goal~~GLS ~~and~~program, ~~intent~~we ~~for~~completed ~~U.S. troop~~negotiations ~~reductions~~with ~~from Iraq. The exact timing of~~ the ~~initial~~customer ~~withdrawal and amount of time~~ to ~~fully withdraw~~modify ~~U.S.~~our ~~troops~~largest istask ~~uncertain.~~order ~~However,~~to ~~many~~include ~~industry~~a ~~observers~~ceiling ~~believe~~for ~~that~~recoverable ~~the~~cost ~~withdrawal will~~of ~~commence~~$752 ~~between 2010 and 2011. On the other hand~~million, ~~President~~resulting ~~Obama has indicated his support for expanded troop levels~~ in ~~Afghanistan. As~~ a ~~result,~~cumulative wereduction ~~expect~~to ~~our~~revenue ~~level~~ of ~~business~~$3.4 ~~involving Iraq~~million toin ~~be relatively stable over~~ the ~~next~~second ~~few~~quarter ~~years,~~of ~~assuming~~fiscal weyear ~~are~~2010. ~~successful~~In inconnection ~~winning~~with ~~new LOGCAP~~these ~~IV task orders in Iraq. In Afghanistan~~negotiations, we ~~aim~~received toindications ~~capitalize~~from ~~on this increase in U.S. government focus through many of~~ our ~~service~~customer ~~offerings,~~that ~~including~~the ~~police~~next ~~training~~option ~~and~~period ~~mentoring, aircraft~~from ~~logistics~~December ~~and~~2009 ~~operations, infrastructure development, MRAP services, and logistics services. Our recent LOGCAP IV award~~ to ~~provide~~December ~~services~~2010 inwill ~~southern~~be ~~Afghanistan is an example of achievements in this area~~exercised.

~~Current~~• ~~Economic~~We ~~Conditions~~ signed an acquisition agreement in September 2009 and subsequently closed the acquisition of Phoenix Consulting Group, LLC on October 19, 2009. See Note 15 — Subsequent Events for additional information concerning this acquisition.

We believe that our industry and customer base are less likely to be affected by many of the factors generally affecting business and consumer spending. Accordingly, we believe that we continue to be well positioned in the current economic environment as a result of historic demand factors affecting our industry, the nature of our contracts and our sources of liquidity. However, we cannot be certain that the economic environment or other factors will not adversely impact our business, financial condition or results of operations in the future.

We believe that our current sources of liquidity will enable us to continue to perform under our existing contracts and further grow our business. However, a longer term credit crisis could adversely affect our ability to obtain additional liquidity or refinance existing indebtedness on acceptable terms or at all, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Internal Factors

We apply a focused strategy that centers on a defined strategic framework. The four key areas identified by DynCorp’s Strategic Framework are Purpose, Objective, Strategy, and Focus Areas.

Purpose

Each word of DynCorp International’s purpose statement “We serve today for a safe tomorrow.TM” is rich in meaning. We... DynCorp International is an integrated global enterprise, united by our shared purpose and values. Serve... This is the essence of how we approach our customers, our stakeholders and our employees. Today... we always work with a strong sense of immediacy and urgency. Safe... This is the difference we make in the world. We lay the groundwork for millions of people around the world to live safer and better lives by helping to rebuild the institution of civil society in war torn regions, training civilian police, and sustaining peacekeepers. Tomorrow... The difference we make has enduring effect. We are a force for shaping a better future.

Objective

Driven by our purpose, we strive to be the leading global government services provider in support of U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. We provide services essential to national security, humanitarian operations, nation building, peacekeeping, and aviation. For approximately 60 years, we have sustained our reputation as a trusted partner to the U.S. government and selected foreign governments by successfully fulfilling the toughest assignments across the globe.

Strategy

To achieve our objective, we crafted a three-part strategy. First, we continue to seek to defend and grow our core business. Second, we believe that the Obama administration’s emphasis on defense, diplomacy, and development creates significant potential for us to expand our business in stabilization & development. Concurrently, we believe that platform support is a promising source of near-term growth, driven largely by reset of equipment. Finally, after servicing the intelligence services through our GLS joint venture, we plan to selectively service new segments to prudently diversify our portfolio, while also adding differentiation to our current offerings.

Focus Areas

We support the three Strategic Framework elements above by leveraging our worldwide infrastructure through five focus areas. We believe that by combining relentless performance, lean enterprise, clear strategy, a winning culture, and being people’s employer of choice, we are able to quickly organize and deploy an integrated workforce, material, and technology solutions across all our areas of specialty. From rapid-response field assignments to long-term engagements, we believe that we provide the world’s most comprehensive array of integrated solutions for ensuring our customers’ success — regardless of the location or conditions.

CONTRACT TYPES

Our business is performed under fixed-price, time-and-materials or cost-reimbursement contracts. Each contract type is described below.

• Fixed-Price Type Contracts: In a fixed-price contract, the price is not subject to adjustment based on costs incurred, which can favorably or adversely impact our profitability depending upon our execution in performing the contracted service. Fixed-price ~~types~~contracts received by us include firm fixed-price, fixed-price with economic adjustment, and fixed-price incentive. • Time-and-Materials Type Contracts: A time-and-materials type contract provides for acquiring supplies or services on the basis of direct labor hours at fixed hourly/daily rates plus materials at cost. • Cost-Reimbursement Type Contracts: Cost-reimbursement type contracts provide for payment of allowable incurred costs, to the extent prescribed in the contract, plus a fixed-fee, award-fee or incentive-fee. Award-fees or incentive-fees are generally based upon various objective and subjective criteria, such as aircraft mission capability rates and meeting cost targets.

~~Any~~• ofTime-and-Materials ~~these~~Type ~~three~~Contracts: ~~types~~A oftime-and-materials ~~contracts~~type ~~discussed above may be executed under an IDIQ~~ contract~~, which~~ ~~are~~provides ~~often~~for ~~awarded~~acquiring tosupplies ~~multiple~~or ~~contractors. An IDIQ contract does not represent a firm order for~~ services. ~~Our~~on ~~Civilian~~the ~~Police,~~basis ~~Field~~of ~~Teams,~~direct ~~and~~labor ~~LOGCAP~~hours IVat ~~programs~~fixed ~~are~~hourly/daily ~~three~~rates ~~examples~~plus ofmaterials ~~IDIQ contracts~~at cost.

32 • Cost-Reimbursement Type Contracts: Cost-reimbursement type contracts provide for payment of allowable incurred costs, to the extent prescribed in the contract, plus a fixed-fee, award-fee or incentive-fee. Award-fees or incentive-fees are generally based upon various objective and subjective criteria, such as aircraft mission capability rates and meeting cost targets.

Any of these three types of contracts discussed above may be executed under an indefinite order indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”) contract, which are often awarded to multiple contractors. An IDIQ contract does not represent a firm order for services. Our CivPol, Field Teams, and LOGCAP IV programs are three examples of IDIQ contracts.

The following table sets forth our approximate fiscal year revenue recognized per our contract mix as of the dates indicated:

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 3,			July 4,
	October 2,			October 3,			October 2,			October 3,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Fixed Price		26	%		31	%
Fixed-Price		27	%		28	%		26	%		30	%
Time-and-Materials		2118	%		2624	%		19	%		25	%
Cost-Reimbursement		5355	%		4348	%		55	%		45	%
		100	%		100	%
Total		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

Over the last year, we have seen an increase in our revenue attributable to cost-reimbursable contracts with corresponding decreases to fixed -price and time-and-materials contracts. This was primarily due to changes from fixed-price to cost-reimbursable task orders on our CivPol program as well as GLS making up a greater percentage of our consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009. We expect this trend to continue as a result of growth in our LOGCAP IV program.

BACKLOG

We track backlog in order to assess our current business development effectiveness and to assist us in forecasting our future business needs and financial performance. Our backlog consists of funded and unfunded amounts under contracts. Funded backlog is equal to the amounts actually appropriated by a customer for payment of goods and services less actual revenue recognized as of the measurement date under that appropriation. Unfunded backlog is the actual dollar value of unexercised, priced contract options, and the unfunded portion of exercised contract options. Most of our U.S. government contracts allow the customer the option to extend the period of performance of a contract for a period of one or more years. These priced options may or may not be exercised at the sole discretion of the customer. It has been our experience that the customer has typically exercised contract options.

Firm funding for our contracts is usually made for one year at a time, with the remainder of the contract period consisting of a series of one-year options. AsOption ~~is the case with the base period of our U.S. government contracts, option~~ periods are subject to the availability of funding for contract performance. The U.S. government is legally prohibited from ordering work under a contract in the absence of funding. Our historical experience has been that the government has typically funded the option periods of our contracts.

The following table sets forth our ~~approximate~~ backlog as of the dates indicated (dollars in millions):

	July 3, 2009		April 3, 2009
	October 2, 2009		April 3, 2009
Funded Backlog	$	1,~~506~~809	$	1,431
Unfunded Backlog		54,~~182~~867		4,867
Total Backlog	$	6,~~688~~676	$	6,298

Total backlog as of ~~July~~October 32, 2009 was $6.7 billion, ~~which increased by $0.4 billion~~ as compared to $6.3 billion as of April 3, 2009, primarily due to a new ~~Worldwide~~task ~~Personal~~orders ~~Protective~~under ~~Services (“WPPS”)~~LOGCAP ~~task~~IV ~~order~~and ~~which~~our isnew ~~expected~~award toproviding ~~ramp~~aircraft maintenance upsupport onat ~~our~~Sheppard ~~second~~Air ~~fiscal~~Force ~~quarter of 2010~~Base. As of ~~July 3~~October 2, 2009 and April 3, 2009, total backlog related to GLS was $2.97 billion and $3.1 billion, ~~respectively~~ ~~and incorporated into the schedule above~~respectively. Additionally, total backlog related to LOGCAP IV was $790.6 ~~million~~billion at ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and included in the ~~schedule~~table above.

ESTIMATED REMAINING CONTRACT VALUE

Our estimated remaining contract value represents total backlog plus management’s estimate of future revenue under IDIQ contracts for task or delivery orders that have not been awarded. Future revenue represents management’s estimate of revenue that will be recognized from future task or delivery orders through the end of the term of such IDIQ contracts and is based on our experience under such IDIQ contracts and our estimates as to future performance. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance that our existing contracts will result in actual revenue in any particular period or at all. Our estimated remaining contract value could vary or even change significantly depending upon various factors including government policies, government budgets and appropriations, the accuracy of our estimates of work to be performed under time -and -material contracts and whether we successfully compete with any multiple bidders in IDIQ contracts. As of ~~July~~October 32, 2009 and April 3, 2009, our estimated remaining contract value was $89.7 0 billion and $8.4 billion, respectively, primarily due to aan ~~new~~increase ~~World Wide Protective Services (“WPPS”) task order, which is expected to ramp up~~ in ~~our second fiscal quarter of 2010~~backlog.

3336

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ~~— Fiscal Quarters Ended July 3, 2009 and July 4, 2008~~

The ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 was a 13-week period from ~~April~~July 4, 2009 to October 2, 2009. The three months ended October 3, 2008 was a 13-week period from July 5, 2008 to October 3, 2008. The six months ended October 2, 2009. was a 26-week period from April 4, 2009 to October 2, 2009. The ~~fiscal~~six ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008 was a 1427-week period from March 29, 2008 to ~~July~~October 43, 2008.

Consolidated — Three and Six Months Ended October 2, 2009 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended October 3, 2008

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, our consolidated results of operations, both in dollars and as a percentage of revenue:

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	~~July~~October 32, 2009					~~July~~October 43, 2008
Revenue	$	~~785~~821,~~177~~372		100.0	%	$	~~716~~779,~~794~~151		100.0	%
Cost of services		(~~699~~727,~~093~~279	)	(8988.05	%)		(~~638~~696,~~389~~519	)	(89.14	%)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(2331,~~438~~304	)	(3.08	%)		(2725,~~851~~994	)	(3.93	%)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(10,~~145~~238	)	(1.32	%)		(10,~~560~~005	)	(1.53	%)
Operating income		52,~~501~~551		6.74	%		3946,~~994~~633		5.6.0	%
Interest expense		(1413,~~610~~691	)	(1.97	)%)		(14,~~215~~905	)	(21.09	%)
Earnings from affiliates		1,054		0.1	%		1,117		0.2	%
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(162	)	(0.0	%)		(4,443	)	(0.6	%)
Interest income		339		0.0	%		344		0.0	%
Earnings from affiliates		1,527		0.2	%		1,523		0.2	%
Other (loss)/income, net		(213	)	(0.0	)%		705		0.1	%
Interest income		103		0.0	%		677		0.1	%
Income before taxes		39,071		5.0	%		27,945		3.9	%
Other (loss)/income, net		(12	)	(0.0	%)		960		0.1	%
Provision for income taxes		(12,627	)	(1.6	%)		(9,316	)	(1.3	%)
Income before taxes		40,316		4.9	%		30,445		3.9	%
Net Income		26,444		3.4	%		18,629		2.6	%
Provision for income taxes		(13,301	)	(1.6	%)		(9,131	)	(1.2	%)
Noncontrolling interests		(5,799	)	(0.7	%)		(649	)	(0.1	%)
Net income		27,015		3.3	%		21,314		2.7	%
Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	20,645		2.6	%	$	17,980		2.5	%
Noncontrolling interests		(6,460	)	(0.8	%)		(8,443	)	(1.1	%)
Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	20,555		2.5	%	$	12,871		1.7	%

Revenue — Revenue for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 of $785.2 million increased by $68.4 million, or 9.5%, as compared with the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2008. The increase, as more fully described in the results by segment, is primarily due to a full quarter of revenue from the Intelligence and Security Command (“INSCOM”) contract, including award fee, in the current fiscal quarter as compared to the ramp-up period in the quarter ended July 4, 2008.


	Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	October 2, 2009					October 3, 2008

Revenue	$	1,606,549		100.0	%	$	1,495,945		100.0	%
Cost of services		(1,426,372	)	(88.8	%)		(1,334,908	)	(89.2	%)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(54,742	)	(3.4	%)		(53,845	)	(3.6	%)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(20,383	)	(1.3	%)		(20,565	)	(1.4	%)

Operating income		105,052		6.5	%		86,627		5.8	%
Interest expense		(28,301	)	(1.8	%)		(29,120	)	(1.9	%)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(146	)	(0.0	%)		(4,443	)	(0.3	%)
Earnings from affiliates		2,581		0.2	%		2,640		0.2	%
Interest income		442		0.0	%		1,021		0.1	%
Other (loss)/income, net		(241	)	(0.0	%)		1,665		0.1	%

Income before taxes		79,387		4.9	%		58,390		3.9	%
Provision for income taxes		(25,928	)	(1.6	%)		(18,447	)	(1.2	%)

Net income		53,459		3.3	%		39,943		2.7	%
Noncontrolling interests		(12,259	)	(0.8	%)		(9,092	)	(0.6	%)

Net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC	$	41,200		2.6	%	$	30,851		2.1	%

~~Cost~~Revenue ~~of services~~ — ~~Costs~~Revenue offor ~~services~~the ~~are~~three ~~comprised~~and ofsix ~~direct~~months ~~labor,~~ended ~~direct material~~October 2, ~~subcontractor~~ ~~costs,~~2009 ~~other~~increased ~~direct~~by ~~costs and overhead~~$42.2 million, ~~Other~~or ~~direct costs include travel~~5.4%, ~~supplies~~ and ~~other~~$110.6 million, ~~miscellaneous~~or ~~costs~~7.4%, ~~Costs~~respectively, ofas ~~services~~compared with revenue for the ~~fiscal~~three and ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~July~~October 3, ~~2009 increased~~2008. byFrom ~~$60.7 million,~~a orthree ~~9.5%~~month perspective, ~~compared~~revenue ~~with~~increased primarily due to the ~~fiscal~~ramp ~~quarter~~up ~~ended~~of ~~July 4~~the Southern Afghanistan LOGCAP IV task order, ~~2008~~partially ~~and~~offset ~~was~~by decreases ~~primarily~~in aour ~~result~~Field ofTeams ~~revenue~~and ~~growth~~CivPol programs. AsFrom a ~~percentage~~six ofmonth ~~revenue~~perspective, ~~costs~~the ofincrease ~~services~~was ~~decreased to~~primarily ~~89.0%~~driven ~~for~~by the ~~fiscal~~ramp ~~quarter~~up ~~ended~~of ~~July 3,~~the ~~2009~~LOGCAP ~~from~~IV ~~89.1%~~program ~~for~~in ~~the~~both ~~fiscal~~Kuwait ~~quarter~~and ~~ended July 4~~Afghanistan, ~~2008.~~ ~~This~~including ~~decrease~~the contract ~~was~~award ~~driven~~fee. byAlso ~~cost~~impacting ~~management~~the ~~efforts~~increase inwas the ~~GPSS~~benefit ~~segment~~of ~~and~~a ~~higher~~full ~~award~~six ~~fees~~months of revenue infrom the ~~GLS~~Intelligence ~~segment,~~and ~~partially~~Security ~~offset~~Command by(“INSCOM”) ~~cost~~contract, ~~increases~~including ~~relative~~award tofee, ~~revenue~~as ~~resulting~~compared ~~from a shift~~to ~~from~~the ~~fixed~~ramp-up ~~price~~period towhich ~~cost~~occurred ~~reimbursable~~during ~~type~~the ~~contracts~~first inquarter ~~the~~of ~~GSDS~~fiscal ~~segment~~year 2009.

~~Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) — SG&A primarily relates to functions~~37 such as management, legal, financial accounting, contracts and administration, human resources, management information systems, purchasing and business development. SG&A was impacted by growth in our underlying business, various initiatives to improve organizational capability, compliance and systems improvements. SG&A for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 decreased by $4.4 million, or 15.8%, compared with the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2008. SG&A as a percentage of revenue decreased to 3.0% for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 compared to 3.9% for the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2008. This was primarily the result of our former CEO’s severance package being incurred in the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2008 and lean infrastructure initiatives in place for the full quarter ended July 3, 2009.

~~Depreciation~~Cost ~~and~~of ~~amortization~~services — ~~Depreciation~~Costs of services are comprised of direct labor, direct material, subcontractor costs, other direct costs and ~~amortization~~overhead. Other direct costs include travel, supplies and other miscellaneous costs. Costs of services for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~ and six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 ~~decreased~~increased by $030.7 million, or 4.4%, and $91.4 million, or 36.9%, respectively, as compared with the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~and six months ended ~~July 4~~October 3, 2008. ~~The~~and ~~decrease~~ was primarily ~~attributed~~a toresult ~~calculating~~of ~~depreciation~~revenue growth. As a percentage of revenue, costs of services decreased to 88.5% and ~~amortization~~88.8% ~~over~~for ~~13 weeks~~the inthree ~~fiscal~~and ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009, respectively, as compared towith ~~14 weeks~~89.4% and 89.2% for the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008, respectively. This decrease primarily was driven by effective cost management efforts on certain programs in the GPSS segment, higher award fees in the GLS segment which have no corresponding costs, and lower losses associated with Afghanistan construction, lower margin on our LOGCAP IV program as a result of the fee sharing arrangement with our partners.

~~Interest~~Selling, ~~expense~~general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) — ~~Interest~~SG&A ~~expense~~primarily relates to functions such as management, legal, financial accounting, contracts and administration, human resources, management information systems, purchasing and business development. SG&A expenses for the ~~fiscal~~three months ~~quarter~~ ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 increased by $05.43 million as compared to the three months ended October 3, or2008. 2As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expenses increased to 3.8% for the three months ended October 2, 2009 as compared ~~with~~to 3.3% for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008. ~~The~~contributed ~~interest expense~~in ~~incurred~~part ~~relates~~by toincreased ~~our~~legal ~~credit facility~~costs, ~~senior~~costs ~~subordinated~~associated ~~notes~~with ~~and~~the ~~amortization~~filing of ~~deferred~~a Form S-3 registration ~~financing~~statement, ~~fees.~~costs ~~The~~associated ~~increase~~with our acquisition strategy, and higher business development costs incurred in ~~interest~~support ~~expense~~of ~~was~~our ~~primarily~~growth ~~driven~~strategy. bySG&A expenses for the ~~senior~~six ~~subordinated notes~~months ~~making~~ended upOctober 2, a2009 increased ~~higher~~by ~~percentage~~$0.9 million ofas ~~our~~compared ~~total~~to ~~debt,~~the ~~which~~six ~~has~~months ~~consistently~~ended ~~carried~~October 3, 2008. As a ~~higher~~percentage of ~~interest~~revenue, ~~rate~~SG&A ~~than~~expenses ~~the~~decreased ~~senior~~to ~~secured~~3.4% ~~credit~~for ~~facility.~~the ~~Higher~~six ~~deferred~~months ~~financing~~ended ~~fee~~October 2, ~~amortization~~2009 as acompared to ~~result~~3.6% offor ~~our~~the ~~July~~six months ended October 3, 2008. ~~debt~~This ~~refinancing~~difference ~~also~~as ~~contributed~~a topercentage ~~this~~of ~~increase.~~revenue ~~This~~ was ~~partially~~ ~~offset~~primarily by the ~~lack~~result of ~~revolver~~our ~~borrowings~~former CEO’s severance package incurred in the first ~~fiscal~~ quarter of ~~2010~~fiscal year 2009.

~~Income~~Depreciation ~~tax~~and ~~expense~~amortization — ~~Our~~Depreciation ~~effective~~and ~~tax~~amortization ~~rate decreased to 32.3%~~ for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 ~~from~~increased 33by $0.2 million or 2.3%. ~~for~~This increase was primarily due to incremental depreciation and amortization associated with our technology transformation initiative which began ramping up in the ~~fiscal~~second quarter ~~ended~~of ~~July 4,~~fiscal ~~2008~~year 2010. ~~Our~~This ~~effective~~investment ~~tax~~to ~~rate~~modernize ~~was~~and upgrade our ~~impacted~~IT bysystems ~~the~~will ~~tax~~enable ~~treatment~~more efficient and effective utilization of ~~our~~IT ~~GLS~~applications, provide better redundancy and ~~DIFZ~~reliability, ~~joint~~integrate ~~ventures~~systems that were previously disconnected and support future growth. From a six month perspective, ~~which~~depreciation ~~are~~and ~~not~~amortization ~~consolidated~~expense ~~for~~had a $0.2 million ~~tax~~decline ~~purposes~~primarily ~~but~~attributed ~~are~~to ~~instead~~calculating ~~taxed~~depreciation and amortization over 26 weeks for the six months ended October 2, 2009, as acompared ~~partnership~~to ~~under~~27 weeks for the ~~Internal~~six ~~Revenue~~months ~~Code~~ended October 3, 2008.

~~Results~~Interest expense — Interest expense for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009 decreased by ~~Segment~~$1.2 million, or 8.1%, and $0.8 million, or 2.8%, respectively, as compared with the three and six months ended October 3, 2008. The interest expense incurred relates to our credit facility, senior subordinated notes, and amortization of deferred financing fees. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to lower principal stemming from the excess cash flow principal payment on the credit facility and repurchases of senior subordinated notes that occurred in fiscal year 2010. Also impacting the decrease was one less week of interest expense during the six months ended October 2, 2009 as compared to the six months ended October 3, 2008.

~~The~~Income ~~following~~tax ~~table~~expense ~~sets~~— ~~forth~~Our effective tax rate increased to 33.0% and 32.7% for the ~~revenue~~three and ~~operating~~six months ~~income~~ended ~~for~~October 2, ~~our~~2009, ~~GSDS~~respectively, ~~GPSS~~as compared with 30.0% and ~~GLS~~31.6% for the three and six ~~operating~~months ~~segments~~ended October 3, ~~both~~2008, inrespectively. ~~dollars~~Our ~~and~~effective astax arate ~~percentage~~was impacted by the tax treatment of our ~~consolidated~~GLS ~~revenue~~ and ~~operating income~~DIFZ joint ventures, ~~for~~which ~~the~~are ~~fiscal~~not ~~quarter~~consolidated ~~ended~~for ~~July 3,~~tax ~~2009~~purposes but are instead taxed as ~~compared~~partnerships tounder the ~~fiscal~~Internal ~~quarter~~Revenue ~~ended July 4, 2008~~Code.

	For the Fiscal Quarter Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2009					July 4, 2008
Revenue
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	284,085		36.2	%	$	269,554		37.6	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		303,648		38.6	%		329,736		46.0	%
Global Linguist Solutions		198,354		25.3	%		118,422		16.5	%
Other/elimination		(910	)	(0.1	%)		(918	)	(0.1	%)
Consolidated	$	785,177		100.0	%	$	716,794		100.0	%
Operating Income
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	15,874		30.2	%	$	22,971		57.4	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		25,910		49.4	%		15,742		39.4	%
Global Linguist Solutions		10,717		20.4	%		1,281		3.2	%
Consolidated	$	52,501		100.0	%	$	39,994		100.0	%

Results by Segment — Three Months Ended October 2, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended October 3, 2008

The following tables set forth the revenue and operating income for our GSDS, GPSS and GLS operating segments, both in dollars and as a percentage of our consolidated revenue and segment operating margin, for the three months ended October 2, 2009 as compared to the three months ended October 3, 2008.


	For the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	October 2, 2009				October 3, 2008
Revenue

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	336,521	41.0	%	$	263,985		33.9	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		284,512	34.6	%		315,241		40.5	%
Global Linguist Solutions		198,393	24.2	%		201,305		25.8	%
Other/elimination		1,946	0.2	%		(1,380	)	(0.2	%)


Consolidated	$	821,372	100.0	%	$	779,151		100.0	%


Operating Income

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	20,386	6.1	%	$	1,036		0.4	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		19,813	7.0	%		28,284		9.0	%
Global Linguist Solutions		12,352	6.2	%		17,313		8.6	%


Consolidated	$	52,551	6.4	%	$	46,633		6.0	%

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions

Revenue — Revenue of $~~284~~336.15 million for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 increased $1472.5 million, or 527.45%, as compared with the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008. The increase was primarily the result of the following:

Security & Training: Revenue of $~~190~~183.34 million increased $144.03 million, or 72.94%, primarily ~~due~~as a toresult ~~new~~of ~~contracts~~a ~~for~~scope increase in our WPPS security services task order in ~~Pakistan~~Iraq and a new WPPS security services task order in Pakistan. Also contributing to the ~~Multinational~~increase was our new Multinational Security Transition Command-Iraq (“MNSTC-I”) program which launched after October 3, 2008. Partially ~~Revenue~~offsetting ~~from~~the revenue generated by these programs was the impact of a decline in our Civilian Police program as a result of reductions in equipment purchases. We expect CivPol ~~programs~~revenue to ~~declined~~increase ~~slightly,~~during ~~primarily~~the remainder of fiscal year 2010 due to ~~changes~~scope increases in ~~contract~~ ~~type~~Afghanistan. ~~from~~In terms ~~firm~~of ~~fixed~~the ~~price~~training tomission ~~cost~~going ~~reimbursable~~forward in Afghanistan ~~offset~~we bybelieve ~~additional~~that operational oversight ~~revenue~~will ~~from~~transition ~~increased~~to ~~service~~the ~~levels~~DoD in ~~Iraq.~~the ~~Although~~not ~~our~~too ~~current~~distant ~~CivPol~~future. The contract isvehicle ~~set~~for the police training mission may also transfer to a DoD vehicle. While the time table for a potential contract ~~expire~~transition is not clear, we believe that our current task order, which currently ends in February 2010, can be extended. If the contract is renewed, we believe that we will retain either all or a large portion of the services under this contract; ~~upon~~however, ~~its~~any ~~renewal~~material changes to the contract, including, but not limited to, the governmental agency that administers the contract, the amount of government funding or the overall scope of services under the renewed program could adversely affect our operating performance.

Contingency Support and Operations: Revenue of $74126.96 million increased $2665.75 million or 55 107.42%, primarily due to increases from both the Kuwait and Afghanistan task orders on our LOGCAP IV program. We expect future growth in this service offering to be primarily driven by the recently awarded Afghanistan South task order on our LOGCAP IV program that carries annual revenue potential of approximately $~~643~~ 600 million. Although we have started work on this program, due to the timing of the award and transition period, we do not expect to achieve in fiscal year 2010, the full fiscal year revenue implied by the annual revenue potential of this program.

35Infrastructure: Revenue of $26.6 million increased by $2.8 million, or 11.6%, primarily due increases from two separate Afghanistan construction projects that commenced after the beginning of fiscal year 2009. We do not expect to bid on any similar fixed-price contracts in Afghanistan without revised terms and conditions. This may impact future revenue in this segment by limiting the construction opportunities available to us.

Operating Income — Operating income of $20.4 million for the three months ended October 2, 2009 increased $19.4 million as compared with the three months ended October 3, 2008. Prior period results were negatively affected by large losses on our Afghanistan construction programs. Also contributing to the increase was an expansion in services on both our WPPS programs in Iraq and Pakistan and our MNSTC-I program, and non-recurring revenue of $5.8 million on our WPPS program. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline in margins on CivPol resulting from the final close out of several firm fixed price task orders in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. For the remainder of fiscal year 2010, we expect an increase in CivPol operating income due to scope increases in Afghanistan.

Infrastructure: Revenue of $18.9 million decreased by $26.2 million, or 58.0%, primarily due to the wind down of a large construction project in Afghanistan combined with the termination of an airport construction contract in Africa, which occurred in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. These declines were offset in part by increases from two separate Afghanistan construction projects that have commenced since the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. We do not expect to bid on any similar fixed-price contracts without revised terms and conditions. This may impact future revenue in this segment by limiting the construction opportunities available to us.

Operating Income — Operating income of $15.9 million for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 decreased $7.1 million, or 30.9%, as compared with the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2008. Operating income did not increase proportionally with the growth in revenue due to lower margins stemming from a shift on our CivPol task orders from fixed price to cost reimbursable in both Afghanistan and Iraq and the ramp up costs incurred on the recently awarded LOGCAP IV Afghanistan South task order. Also contributing to the decline was additional loss reserves of $3.2 million on our Afghanistan construction contracts recorded during the fiscal quarter combined with the impact of the termination of an airport construction contract in Africa, which occurred at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. This was partially offset by increases in services on both our WPPS programs in Iraq and Pakistan and our MNSTC-I program and increases in the Somalia task order on our Africa Peacekeeping Program resulting from scope increases in both services and equipment sales coupled with a higher fee structure.

Global Platform Support Solutions

Revenue — Revenue of $~~303~~284.65 million for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 decreased $2630.0 7 million, or 7.9.7%, as compared with the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008. The decrease primarily resulted from the following:

Aviation: Revenue of $~~265~~249.35 million decreased $3424.78 million, or ~~11.6~~9%, for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter ended~~months ~~July~~ended October 32, 2009, as compared to the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008. The decrease was ~~primarily~~ primarily driven by declines in ~~INL~~the ~~Air~~Field ~~Wing~~Service ofOperations ~~$31.7 million~~(“FSO”) ~~and~~business ~~FSO~~area of $1727.19 million. ~~The revenue~~FSO ~~decline in INL Air Wing~~ revenue ~~was driven by non-recurring equipment sales and construction work in both Camp Alvarado and Camp Valdes in Afghanistan performed in fiscal year 2009. FSO revenue~~ declined due to the ~~loss~~completion of several CFT task orders, for which ~~was~~we adid ~~result~~not ofwin the re-competes due to additional competitors in this service space. While ~~this~~the isadditional ~~putting~~competition puts downward pressure on fiscal year 2010 revenue, we do not believe this will limit our long -term opportunities under the CFT program. These declines were partially offset by additional services , including a new task order as a subcontractor to provide aircraft maintenance to support the Afghanistan air force through our Counter Narcotics Technical Program Office (“CNTPO”) program. We also expect continued growth driven by a recent WPPS task order win to provide aircraft maintenance and air transportation services that is expected to ramp up by the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. This program was originally slated to ramp-up in the current quarter but was delayed due to a change in customer requirements.

Land Systems: Revenue of $3835.30 million ~~increased~~decreased $85.89 million, or 2914.74%, for the ~~fiscal quarter~~three months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009, as compared to the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008, primarily due to a ~~increased~~decrease ~~services~~in ~~associated~~our ~~with~~General ~~the~~Maintenance ~~MRAP~~Corps ~~contract.~~(“GMC”) ~~This~~program, ~~was~~ partially offset by ~~decreases~~an increase in services ~~provided~~associated ~~under~~with our ~~General~~MRAP ~~Maintenance Corps (“GMC”)~~ program.

Operating Income — Operating income of $19.8 million for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 ~~increased~~decreased by $108.2 5 million, or 6430.60%, as compared with the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily driven by lower gross profit of $5.6 million on our FSO programs resulting from completion of task orders and $3.4 million on our GMC program resulting from adjustments to the estimated contract value on the GMC program. SG&A costs increased primarily due to an increase in bid and proposal activity. Partially offsetting this was better cost management in several key ~~Aviation~~aviation programs as well as ~~growth~~improved ~~from new~~margins ~~contracts~~on ~~and~~our ~~task~~INL ~~orders~~Air ~~within~~Wing ~~that~~Program ~~service~~driven ~~offering~~by effective cost management and favorable foreign currency rates. ~~Increased~~Although ~~services~~we ~~under~~expect our MRAP program to continue to be profitable in fiscal year 2011, we expect lower gross profit on our MRAP program starting ~~also~~in ~~contributed~~fiscal toyear 2011 reflecting an adjusted rate structure on the ~~increase~~next option period.

Global Linguist Solutions

Revenue of $198.4 million ~~increased~~decreased $792.9 million, or 671.54%, for the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July 3~~October 2, 2009, as compared to the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 43, 2008. This ~~increase~~quarter-over-quarter decrease was due primarily ~~due~~ to the ~~fact~~timing ~~that~~of the ~~INSCOM~~award ~~contract~~fee ~~was~~accrual ~~fully~~in ~~operational throughout~~ the second quarter ~~ended~~of ~~July 3,~~fiscal year 2009, ~~whereas~~which ~~INSCOM~~represented ~~was~~the ~~ramping~~initial uprecognition inof the ~~quarter~~award ~~ended~~fee ~~July 4,~~from ~~2008.~~the ~~Revenue~~contract’s ~~was~~inception. Additionally, ~~also~~we ~~impacted~~completed bynegotiations with the ~~recognition~~ ofcustomer ~~the~~to ~~INSCOM~~modify ~~award~~our ~~fee~~largest intask ~~the~~order ~~quarter~~to include ~~ended~~a ~~July~~ceiling for recoverable cost of $752 3million, ~~2009.~~resulting Noin ~~award~~a ~~fee~~cumulative ~~was~~reduction ~~recorded~~to revenue of $3.4 million in the ~~first~~second quarter ~~ended~~of ~~July 4,~~fiscal ~~2008~~year as2010. ~~there~~In ~~was~~connection ~~not~~with ~~sufficient~~these negotiations, ~~history~~we atreceived indications from our customer that ~~time~~the next option period from December 2009 to ~~support~~December 2010 will be exercised. During the quarter we also received better than expected award fee determinations from our customer which resulted in additional revenue ~~recognition~~in the period.

36Operating income of $12.4 million decreased $5.0 million for the three months ended October 2, 2009, as compared to the three months ended October 3, 2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to the timing of the award fee accrual in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, which represented the initial recognition of the award fee from the contract’s inception. Operating income earned by GLS benefits net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC by our 51% ownership of the joint venture.

~~Operating~~Results ~~income~~by ofSegment ~~$10.7 million~~— ~~increased~~Six ~~$9.4 million~~Months ~~for~~Ended ~~the fiscal quarter ended July~~October 32, 2009, as ~~compared~~Compared to the ~~fiscal~~Six ~~quarter~~Months ~~ended~~Ended ~~July 4, 2008. This is primarily due to the fact that~~October ~~the INSCOM contract was fully operational throughout the quarter ended July~~ 3, ~~2009, whereas GLS was ramping up in the quarter ended July 4,~~ 2008~~. Operating income was also significantly impacted~~ by the inclusion of the award fee in the quarter ended July 3, 2009. Operating income earned by GLS benefits net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC only by our 51% ownership portion, as 49% of earnings from the joint venture are reflected in noncontrolling interests as a reduction to net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC

The following tables set forth the revenue and operating income for our GSDS, GPSS and GLS operating segments, both in dollars and as a percentage of our consolidated revenue and segment operating margin, for the six months ended October 2, 2009 as compared to the six months ended October 3, 2008.


	For the Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	October 2, 2009				October 3, 2008
Revenue
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	620,606	38.6	%	$	533,539		35.7	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		588,160	36.6	%		644,978		43.1	%
Global Linguist Solutions		396,748	24.7	%		319,727		21.4	%
Other/elimination		1,035	0.1	%		(2,299	)	(0.2	%)


Consolidated	$	1,606,549	100.0	%	$	1,495,945		100.0	%


Operating Income
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	36,278	5.9	%	$	24,006		4.5	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		45,710	7.8	%		44,027		6.8	%
Global Linguist Solutions		23,064	5.8	%		18,549		5.8	%


Consolidated	$	105,052	6.5	%	$	86,627		5.8	%

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions

Revenue — Revenue of $620.6 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 increased $87.1 million, or 16.3%, as compared with the six months ended October 3, 2008. The increase was primarily the result of the following:

Security & Training: Revenue of $373.7 million increased $18.3 million, or 5.2%, primarily as a result of a scope increase in our WPPS security services task order in Iraq and a new WPPS security services task order in Pakistan. Also contributing to the increase was our new MNSTC-I program which launched after October 3, 2008. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline in our CivPol program as a result of reductions in equipment purchases. However, we expect increases in CivPol revenue during the rest of fiscal year 2010 due to scope increases in Afghanistan. In terms of the training mission going forward in Afghanistan we believe that operational oversight will transition to the DoD in the not too distant future. The contract vehicle for the police training mission may also transfer to a DoD vehicle. While the time table for a potential contract transition is not clear, we believe that our current task order, which currently ends in February 2010, can be extended. If the contract is renewed, we believe that we will retain either all or a large portion of the services under this contract; however, any material changes to the contract, including, but not limited to, the governmental agency that administers the contract, the amount of government funding or the overall scope of services under the renewed program could adversely affect our operating performance.

Contingency Support and Operations: Revenue of $201.4 million increased $92.2 million or 84.4%, primarily due to increases from the Kuwait task orders and ramp-up of our southern Afghanistan task orders on our LOGCAP IV program. We expect future growth in this service offering to be primarily driven by the recently awarded Afghanistan task order on our LOGCAP IV program that carries annual revenue potential of approximately $600 million. Although we have started work on this program, due to the timing of the award and transition period, we do not expect to achieve in fiscal year 2010 the full fiscal year revenue implied by the annual revenue potential of this program.

Infrastructure: Revenue of $45.5 million decreased by $23.4 million, or 34.0%, primarily due to the wind-down of a large construction project in Afghanistan combined with the termination of an airport construction contract in Africa, which occurred in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. These declines were offset in part by increases from two separate Afghanistan construction projects that commenced after the beginning of fiscal year 2009. We do not expect to bid on any similar fixed-price contracts in Afghanistan without revised terms and conditions. This may impact future revenue in this segment by limiting the construction opportunities available to us.

Operating Income — Operating income of $36.3 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 increased $12.3 million, or 51.4%, as compared with the six months ended October 3, 2008. Prior period results were negatively affected by large losses on our Afghanistan construction programs. Also contributing to the increase was an expansion in services on both our WPPS programs in Iraq and Pakistan and our MNSTC-I program, and non-recurring revenue of $5.8 million on our WPPS program. Partially offsetting this increase was lower profitability in our CivPol program as a result of the final close out of several firm fixed price task orders in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. For the remainder of fiscal year 2010, we expect an increase in CivPol operating income due to scope increases in Afghanistan.

Global Platform Support Solutions

Revenue — Revenue of $588.2 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 decreased $56.8 million, or 8.8%, as compared with the six months ended October 3, 2008. The decrease primarily resulted from the following:

Aviation: Revenue of $514.8 million decreased $59.7 million, or 10.4%, for the six months ended October 2, 2009, as compared to the six months ended October 3, 2008. The decrease was primarily driven by declines in FSO programs of $44.6 million and the INL Air Wing program of $37.8 million. FSO revenue declined due to the completion of several CFT task orders, for which we did not win the re-competes due to additional competitors in this service space. While this is putting downward pressure on fiscal year 2010 revenue, we do not believe this will limit our long-term opportunities under the CFT program. The revenue decline in INL Air Wing revenue was driven by non-recurring equipment sales and construction work in both Camp Alvarado and Camp Valdes in Afghanistan performed in fiscal year 2009. These declines were partially offset by additional services including a new task order as a subcontractor to provide aircraft maintenance to support the Afghanistan air force through our CNTPO program. We also expect continued growth driven by a recent WPPS task order win to provide aircraft maintenance and air transportation services that is expected to ramp up by the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010.

Land Systems: Revenue of $73.4 million increased $2.9 million, or 4.1%, for the six months ended October 2, 2009, as compared to the six months ended October 3, 2008, primarily due to increased services associated with the MRAP contract which generated $49.8 million of revenue for the six months ended October 2, 2009 as compared to $35.3 for the six months ended October 3, 2008. This was partially offset by a decrease in our GMC program.

Operating Income — Operating income of $45.7 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 increased $1.6 million, or 3.8%, as compared with the six months ended October 3, 2008. The increase was primarily driven by better cost management in several key aviation programs, improved cost management and favorable foreign currency rates in the INL Air Wing program, and increased services under our MRAP program. This was partially offset due to lower gross profit on our FSO programs due to the loss of several CFT task orders and lower margins on some existing CFT task orders, which was a result of additional competitors in this service space. Also negatively impacting operating income was adjustments to the estimated contract value on the GMC program. Although we expect our MRAP program to continue to be profitable in fiscal year 2011, we expect lower gross profit on our MRAP program starting in fiscal year 2011, reflecting an adjusted rate structure on the next option period.

Global Linguist Solutions

Revenue of $396.7 million increased $77.0 million, or 24.1%, for the six months ended October 2, 2009, as compared to the six months ended October 3, 2008. GLS revenue benefited from higher award fees as a result of improved performance, higher fill rates as compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009 and a full six months of performance during the first half of fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 in which GLS was transitioning the contract from the prior provider.

Operating income of $23.1 million increased $4.5 million, or 24.2% for the six months ended October 2, 2009, as compared to the six months ended October 3, 2008. This increase was primarily due to a full six months of performance during the first half of fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 in which GLS was transitioning the contract from the prior provider. The increase was also supported by higher award fees earned during the period, partially offset by the impact of the modification on the INSCOM contract. Operating income earned by GLS benefits net income attributable to DynCorp International LLC by our 51% ownership of the joint venture.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash generated by operations and borrowings available under our credit facility are our primary sources of short-term liquidity. Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations and our available borrowings under our credit facility will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. However, we cannot be assured that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness, including the senior subordinated notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs.

~~To support growth related to potential contract and task order awards that could occur over~~42 the remainder of the fiscal year and to service our current indebtedness, we may require additional capital beyond that currently provided from operations and by our senior secured credit facility. There can be no assurance that sufficient capital will continue to be available in the future or that it will be available on terms acceptable to us. Failure to obtain sufficient capital could materially affect our future expansion strategies.

We expect that our improved cash collection efforts achieved in fiscal year 2009, evidenced by our reduced days sales outstanding, will be sustainable in fiscal year 2010 and will help facilitate sufficient cash flow from operations to fund our expected growth. We expect significant investment requirements from three new activities during the remainder of fiscal year 2010: (i) the expansion of the LOGCAP IV contract, (ii) a significant fixed asset purchase, and (iii) the potential for one or more acquisitions.

Our recent win of a new LOGCAP IV task order in southern Afghanistan and the potential to win additional sizeable task orders later this fiscal year will produce demands for liquidity to fund growth on this program. We expect cash contributions from our LOGCAP IV collaborative partners and timely cash collections on the project to support the liquidity needed on this program. During the second quarter, we will utilize cash on hand to purchase $52 million of helicopters in order to support the requirements on a new task order received during the fiscal year. While we do not typically invest capital in fixed asset purchases due to the service nature of our operations, such a purchase may be necessary from time to time. Lastly, as part of our business strategy, we may invest in one or more business acquisitions from time to time. We expect to fund our fiscal year 2010 acquisitions from available borrowing capacity and cash on hand.

Cash Flow Analysis

	Fiscal Quarter Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	July 3, 2009			July 4, 2008
Net Cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	5,448		$	(71,131	)
Net Cash used in investing activities		(1,294	)		(1,451	)
Net Cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(45,083	)		20,703

Cash provided by operating activities for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 was $5.4 million, as compared to $71.1 million of cash used in the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2008. Cash generated from operations in the quarter ended July 3, 2009 benefited from the combination of our continued net income growth from new contracts and continued focus on working capital management. Net of revenue growth, our accounts receivable improved due to billing and collection efficiencies implemented during fiscal year 2009. As a result of these efforts, Days Sales Outstanding (“DSO”), a key metric utilized by management to monitor collection efforts on accounts receivable, decreased to 71 days for the quarter ended July 3, 2009 as compared to 82 days for the quarter ended July 4, 2008.

Cash used in investing activities was $1.3 million for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 as compared to $1.5 million for the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2008. The cash used was primarily for computer software upgrades and property and equipment additions.

~~Cash~~In ~~used~~the insecond ~~financing~~quarter ~~activities~~of ~~was~~fiscal year 2010, we capitalized approximately $4542.16 million ~~for~~in ~~the~~helicopter assets ~~fiscal~~of ~~quarter~~which ~~ended~~approximately ~~July~~$39.7 3,million ~~2009, as~~was ~~compared~~paid toin cash. ~~provided~~Of ofthese helicopter assets, $206.7 3 million ~~for~~were ~~the~~classified ~~fiscal~~as ~~quarter~~available ~~ended~~for ~~July 4,~~sale ~~2008~~and included in inventory. The ~~cash~~remainder were ~~used~~classified byas ~~financing~~fixed ~~activities~~assets ~~during~~and ~~the~~included ~~fiscal~~in ~~quarter~~Property ~~ended~~and ~~July 3~~equipment, ~~2009~~net. ~~was~~These helicopter ~~primarily~~assets ~~due~~were tooriginally ~~the excess~~purchased ~~cash~~in ~~flow~~support ~~principal~~of ~~repayment~~a onnew program in our ~~senior~~GPSS ~~secured~~operating segment. ~~credit~~Given ~~facility~~availability of customer assets to support this program, we mutually agreed to a task order modification under which the ~~repurchases~~customer ofwill now supply its own helicopters. As a result, ~~portion~~we ofplan ~~our~~to ~~senior~~utilize ~~subordinated~~the ~~notes~~purchased ~~and~~helicopter ~~payments~~assets on other programs, some of ~~noncontrolling~~which ~~interests~~may ~~dividends~~be structured as cost-reimbursable instead of fixed priced.

We expect significant cash requirements from three areas of our business during the remainder of fiscal year 2010: (i) the expansion of the LOGCAP IV contract (ii) the potential for one or more acquisitions and (iii) noncontrolling interest payments to our joint venture partners. Our recent win of a new LOGCAP IV task order in southern Afghanistan and the potential to win additional sizeable task orders later this fiscal year will produce demands for liquidity to fund growth on this program. We expect cash contributions from our LOGCAP IV collaborative partners and timely cash collections on the project to support the liquidity needed on this program.

We paid approximately $46 million on October 19, 2009 from cash on hand to acquire Phoenix. Aside from the maximum of $5 million of contingent consideration which may be payable in fiscal year 2011, we do not foresee the need to make significant capital investments into Phoenix and expect Phoenix to generate positive operating cash flows. As we continue our acquisition strategy, we may need to borrow to fund larger acquisitions or multiple acquisitions.

Cash Flow Analysis


	Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	October 2, 2009			October 3, 2008
Net Cash provided by operating activities	$	33,378		$	37,953
Net Cash used in investing activities		(36,262	)		(19,718	)
Net Cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(65,254	)		29,165

Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended October 2, 2009 was $33.4 million, as compared to $38.0 million for the six months ended October 3, 2008. Cash generated from operations in the six months ended October 2, 2009 benefited from the combination of our continued profitable revenue growth from new contracts combined with seasonal payment cycles associated with our largest customers’ fiscal calendar, offset by changes in working capital, an increase in restricted cash and amounts spent on helicopter assets considered available for sale. Net of revenue growth, our accounts receivable collections efforts continued to be effective. Days Sales Outstanding (“DSO”), a key metric utilized by management to monitor collection efforts on accounts receivable was 68 days at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, consistent with our expectation of high 60s to low 70s on an ongoing basis.

Cash used in investing activities was $36.3 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009 as compared to $19.7 million for the six months ended October 3, 2008. During the second quarter, we utilized cash on hand to purchase helicopters in support of a new task order. While we do not typically invest capital in fixed asset purchases due to the service nature of our operations, such a purchase may be necessary from time to time.

Cash used in financing activities was $65.3 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009, as compared to cash provided of $29.2 million for the six months ended October 3, 2008. The cash used by financing activities during the six months ended October 2, 2009 was primarily due to the excess cash flow principal repayment on our senior secured credit facility, the repurchases of a portion of our senior subordinated notes and payments of noncontrolling interest dividends.

Financing

As of ~~July~~October 32, 2009, nothere ~~balance~~were ~~was~~no ~~outstanding~~borrowings under the ~~Revolving~~revolving ~~Facility~~facility, and $176.6 million was outstanding under the ~~Term~~term ~~Loan~~loan ~~Facility~~facility. Our available borrowing capacity under the revolving ~~Revolving~~facility ~~Facility~~ totaled $170.56 million at ~~July~~October 32, 2009, which gives effect to $29.54 million of outstanding letters of credit. The weighted-average interest rate atfor ~~July 3~~the six months ended October 2, 2009 for our borrowings under the credit facility was 3.6639% excluding the impact of our interest rate swaps. We expect the applicable margin on our credit facility to decline by 0.25% in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010.

We have entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge our exposure to interest rate increases related to our credit facility. These agreements are more fully described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

~~We are required, under certain circumstances as defined in our credit agreement, to use a~~43 percentage of excess cash generated from operations to reduce the outstanding principal of the term loans in the following year. Such payments are due near the end of the first quarter of the following fiscal year. We paid $23.4 million in June 2009 to satisfy our fiscal year 2009 requirement. The excess cash flow measurement is an annual requirement of the credit agreement and, as a result, we cannot estimate with certainty the excess cash flow that will be generated, if any, for the fiscal year ending April 2, 2010.

InTable the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we repurchased $10.3 million of our senior subordinated notes at a discount resulting in an insignificant gain. As of July 3, 2009, $389.7 million of principal was outstanding under our senior subordinated notes. Our senior subordinated notes mature February 2013. Interest accrues on our senior subordinated notes and is payable semi-annually. Contents

In the first two quarters of fiscal year 2010, we repurchased $24.3 million of our senior subordinated notes. As of October 2, 2009, $375.4 million of principal was outstanding under our senior subordinated notes. Our senior subordinated notes mature February 2013. Interest accrues on our senior subordinated notes and is payable semi-annually.

Debt Covenants and Other Matters

Our credit facility inand ~~place~~senior assubordinated ofnotes ~~July 3,~~contain ~~2009 contained~~ various financial covenants, including minimum levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), minimum interest and fixed charge coverage ratios, and maximum capital expenditures and total leverage ratio. Non-financial covenants restrict our ability to dispose of assets; incur additional indebtedness; prepay other indebtedness or amend certain debt instruments; pay dividends; create liens on assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; make investments, loans or advances; issue certain equity instruments; make acquisitions; engage in mergers or consolidations or engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and otherwise restrict certain corporate activities. We had no instances of noncompliance with our various financial and non-financial covenants at ~~July~~October 32, 2009.

Our credit facility and senior subordinated notes contain specific covenant requirements which may limit our ability to make acquisitions or require us to obtain debt holder approval. We may also be limited by our debt agreements as to the cumulative size of our acquisitions, the type of businesses we may purchase and the forecasted effects on our overall financial statements.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

InAs ~~accordance~~of ~~with~~October 2, ~~the~~2009, ~~definition~~we did not have any off balance sheet arrangements as defined under SEC rules,. ~~the~~We ~~following~~recognize ~~qualify~~all derivatives as ~~off-~~either assets or liabilities at fair value in our consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets. Refer to Note 7 of our consolidated financial statements for ~~arrangements:~~additional disclosure on derivatives and Note 11 for additional disclosure on variable interest entities.

• Any obligation under certain guarantee contracts; • A retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets; • Any obligation under certain derivative instruments; and • Any obligation arising out of a material variable interest held by us in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

As of July 3, 2009, we did not have any off balance sheet arrangements as defined above. We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 7 of our consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure on derivatives and Note 11 for additional disclosure on variable interest entities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements and related footnotes contained within this Quarterly Report. Our more critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were discussed in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009.

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions to determine certain of the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based upon what we believe is the best information available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Based on an assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that our consolidated financial statements provide a meaningful and fair perspective of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Interim Goodwill Assessment

We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually and when an event occurs or circumstances change to suggest that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Our annual testing date is at the fiscal end of February of each fiscal year. We test goodwill for impairment by first comparing the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units. If the fair value is less than the book value, we record impairment, if any, to the extent that the estimated fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value.

We estimate a portion of the fair value of our reporting units under the income approach by utilizing a discounted cash flow model based on several factors including balance sheet carrying values, historical results, our most recent forecasts, and other relevant quantitative and qualitative information. We discount the related cash flow forecasts using the weighted-average cost of capital method at the date of evaluation. We also use the market approach to estimate the remaining portion of our reporting unit valuation. This technique utilizes comparative market multiples in the valuation estimate. We have historically applied a 50%/50% weighting to each approach. While the income approach has the advantage of utilizing more company specific information, the market approach has the advantage of capturing market based transaction pricing. Significant changes in these forecasts, the discount rate selected, or the weighting of the income and market approach could affect the estimated fair value of one or more of our reporting units and could result in a goodwill impairment charge in a future period.

The combined estimated fair value of all of our reporting units from the weighted total of the market approach and income approach often results in a premium over our market capitalization, commonly referred to as a control premium. The calculated control premium percentage is evaluated and compared to an estimated acceptable maximum percentage. In the event that the calculated control premium is above this maximum, a portion of the excess control premium is allocated to reduce the fair value of each reporting unit in order to further access whether any reporting units have incurred goodwill impairment. Assessing the acceptable control premium percentage requires judgment and is impacted by external factors such as observed control premiums from comparable transactions derived from the prices paid on recent publically disclosed acquisitions in our industry.

In determining whether an interim triggering event has occurred, management monitors (i) the actual performance of the business relative to the fair value assumptions used during our annual goodwill impairment test, (ii) significant changes to future expectations (iii) and our market capitalization, which is based on our Parent’s average stock price and average common shares over a recent timeframe. During the six months ended October 2, 2009, we did not identify any triggering events which would require an update to our annual impairment test.

ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS

We have presented the information about accounting pronouncements not yet implemented in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.


ITEM 3.		QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009.


ITEM 4.		CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

~~(a) Evaluation of~~ Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”), allowing timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the last fiscal quarter covered by this report, based on an evaluation carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934), the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

~~(b)~~ Changes in Internal ~~Controls~~Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have occurred during the ~~fiscal~~three ~~quarter~~months ended ~~July~~October 32, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.		LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information related to various commitments and contingencies is described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

39We have identified certain payments made to expedite the issuance of a limited number of visas and licenses from foreign government agencies that may raise compliance issues under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The payments, which we believe totaled approximately $300,000 in the aggregate, were made to sub-contractors in connection with servicing a single existing task order that the Company has with a U.S. government agency. We have retained outside counsel to investigate these payments. We are in the process of evaluating our internal policies and procedures and are committed to improving our compliance procedures. During the past week, we voluntarily brought these matters to the attention of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission. We cannot predict the ultimate consequences of these matters at this time, nor can we reasonably estimate the potential liability, if any, related to these matters. However, based on the facts currently known, we do not believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.


ITEM 1A.		RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in risk factors from those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009.


ITEM 2.		UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.


ITEM 3.		DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.


ITEM 4.		SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.


ITEM 5.		OTHER INFORMATION

None.


ITEM 6.		EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


Exhibit
Number			Description

	31.1	*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	31.2	*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32.1	*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32.2	*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Exhibit
Number		Description
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


*		Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC /s/ Michael J. Thorne Michael J. Thorne Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: ~~August~~November 612, 2009

4147

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · DynCorp International LLC