UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~MARCH~~JUNE 3130, 2011


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-51104

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland		52-2180744
(State or Other Jurisdiction		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of Incorporation or Organization)

1804 West Street, Suite 200, Annapolis, MD 21401
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

410-280-6695

~~410-280-6695~~ (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by ~~check~~checkmark ~~mark~~ whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See ~~definition~~the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, ” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in ~~Rule 12b~~Rule12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of ~~May~~August 94, 2011 the number of outstanding shares of registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share was: 1,820,548

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

	Page(s)
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 — Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition — March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010 (Audited)		3
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition — June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010 (Audited)		3
FOR PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 and 2010:
FOR PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 and 2010:
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three months (Unaudited)		4
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Six and Three months (Unaudited)		4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity — Three months (Unaudited)		5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity — Six and three months (Unaudited)		5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Three months (Unaudited)		6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Six months (Unaudited)		6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7-10
Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis		1011-2729
Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		2830
Item 4 — Controls and Procedures		2830
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings		2830
Item 1A Risk Factors		2830
Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		2830
Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities		2830
Item 4 — [Removed and Reserved]		2830
Item 5 — Other Information		2830
Item 6 — Exhibits		2931
SIGNATURES		3032
Exhibit 31(a)
Exhibit 31(b)
Exhibit 32(a)
Exhibit 32(b)
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010~~ (Dollars in thousands except per share data)

	March 31,			December 31,
	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	2,~~860~~072		$	1,437
Interest bearing deposits		1223,~~519~~683			12,289
Cash and cash equivalents		1525,~~379~~755			13,726
Investments in restricted stocks, at cost		527			527
Loans receivable		~~187~~180,~~661~~620			184,883
Allowance for loan losses		(3,~~589~~371	)		(3,174	)
Net loans receivable		~~184~~177,~~072~~249			181,709
Premises and equipment, net		~~507~~464			556
Accrued interest receivable		~~761~~721			750
Deferred income taxes		1,~~413~~266			1,133
Other real estate owned		23,~~799~~332			3,324
Other assets		1,~~088~~282			1,399
Total Assets	$	~~206~~210,~~546~~596		$	203,124
LIABILITIES
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	2526,~~442~~474		$	23,760
Interest bearing deposits		~~157~~160,~~227~~164			156,350
Total deposits		~~182~~186,~~669~~638			180,110
Accrued interest payable		~~117~~98			106
Other liabilities		~~947~~594			543
Total Liabilities		~~183~~187,~~733~~330			180,759
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock — $.01 par value; authorized 4,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding: 1,820,548 shares at March 31, 2011 and at December 31, 2010		18			18
Issued and outstanding: 1,820,548 shares at June 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010		18			18
Additional paid-in capital		17,853			17,853
Retained earnings		45,~~942~~395			4,494
Total Stockholders’ Equity		2223,~~813~~266			22,365
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	~~206~~210,~~546~~596		$	203,124

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Six and Three Months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited) ~~(Dollars in thousands except per share data)~~

	March 31,		March 31,
	2011		2010
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	3,057	$	3,124
Investment in stocks		7		7
Interest bearing deposits		13		9
Total interest income		3,077		3,140
Interest expense:
Deposits		568		886
Total interest expense		568		886
Net interest income		2,509		2,254
Less provision for loan losses		681		447
		1,828		1,807
Non-interest income:
Gain on sale of SBA loans		209		225
Gain on sale of other real estate owned		43		—
Service charges and other income		149		121
Total non-interest income		401		346
Non-interest expenses:
Compensation and benefits		772		721
Legal and professional		65		55
Rent and occupancy		145		139
Marketing and business development		18		22
FDIC insurance		89		76
Data processing		37		36
Support services		47		47
Communications		33		32
Depreciation and amortization		52		59
Other		242		89
Total non-interest expenses		1,500		1,276
Income before income taxes		729		877
Income tax expense		281		349
Net income and total comprehensive income	$	448	$	528
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.25	$	0.29

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)


	Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	6,075	$	6,292	$	3,018	$	3,168
Investment in stocks		14		14		7		7
Interest bearing deposits		28		24		15		15

Total interest income		6,117		6,330		3,040		3,190


Interest expense:
Deposits		1,118		1,747		550		861

Total interest expense		1,118		1,747		550		861


Net interest income		4,999		4,583		2,490		2,329

Less provision for loan losses		1,308		1,034		627		587

		3,691		3,549		1,863		1,742


Non-interest income:
Gain on sales of SBA loans		343		370		134		145
Gain on sales of other real estate owned		52		—		9		—
Service charges and other income		290		246		141		126

Total non-interest income		685		616		284		271


Non-interest expenses:
Compensation and benefits		1,543		1,464		771		743
Legal and professional		119		132		54		77
Rent and occupancy		282		279		137		140
Marketing and business development		46		48		28		26
FDIC insurance		155		156		66		80
Data processing		75		72		38		36
Support services		108		102		61		55
Loan collection		89		37		32		21
Other real estate owned loss provision		125		—		50		—
Communications		67		63		34		32
Depreciation and amortization		102		118		50		59
Other		208		169		98		96

Total non-interest expenses		2,919		2,640		1,419		1,365

Income before income taxes		1,457		1,525		728		648
Income tax expense		556		609		275		260

Net income	$	901	$	916	$	453	$	388

Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.49	$	0.50	$	0.25	$	0.21

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

For the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 ~~(Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)~~

			Additional
	Common		Paid-in		Retained
	Stock		Capital		Earnings		Total
Balance December 31, 2009	$	18	$	17,853	$	3,071	$	20,942
Net income — March 31, 2010						528		528
Balance March 31, 2010	$	18	$	17,853	$	3,599	$	21,470
Balance December 31, 2010	$	18	$	17,853	$	4,494	$	22,365
Net income — March 31, 2011						448		448
Balance March 31, 2011	$	18	$	17,853	$	4,942	$	22,813

(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)


			Additional
	Common		Paid-in		Retained
	Stock		Capital		Earnings		Total
Balance December 31, 2009	$	18	$	17,853	$	3,071	$	20,942

Net income- June 30, 2010						916		916


Balance June 30, 2010	$	18	$	17,853	$	3,987	$	21,858


Balance December 31, 2010	$	18	$	17,853	$	4,494	$	22,365

Net income- June 30, 2011						901		901


Balance June 30, 2011	$	18	$	17,853	$	5,395	$	23,266

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

For the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 ~~(Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)~~

	March 31,			March 31,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	448		$	528
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization		52			59
Gain on sales of SBA loans		(209	)		(225	)
Gain on sales of other real estate owned		(43	)		—
Provision for loan losses		681			447
Provision for losses on unfunded commitments		—			2
Valuation allowance on other real estate owned		75			—
Deferred income taxes		(280	)		39
Change in assets and liabilities:
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(11	)		(35	)
Decrease in other assets		236			92
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable		11			(4	)
Increase in other liabilities		404			346
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,364			1,249
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Increase in loans, net		(5,171	)		(3,358	)
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans		2,336			3,765
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		568			—
Purchase of premises and equipment		(3	)		(19	)
Net cash (used by) provided by investing activities		(2,270	)		388
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase in non-interest bearing deposits, net		1,682			2,643
Net increase in other deposits		877			9,790
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,559			12,433
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		1,653			14,070
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		13,726			10,488
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	15,379		$	24,558
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	557		$	890
Income taxes paid	$	—		$	—
Transfer of loans to real estate owned	$	—		$	653

(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)


	June 30,			June 30,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	901		$	916
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization		102			118
Gain on sales of SBA loans		(343	)		(370	)
Gain on sale of other real estate owned		(52	)		—
Provision for loan losses		1,308			1,034
Provision for losses on unfunded commitments		—			6
Write-downs of other real estate owned		125			—
Deferred income taxes		(133	)		269
Change in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		29			(124	)
Decrease (increase) in other assets		117			(126	)
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(8	)		(19	)
Increase in other liabilities		51			39

Net cash provided by operating activities		2,097			1,743


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans		4,885			5,575
Increase in loans, net		(1,390	)		(6,799	)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		724			—
Increase in other real estate owned		(805	)		—
Purchase of premises and equipment		(10	)		(28	)

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		3,404			(1,252	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase in non-interest bearing deposits, net		2,714			2,357
Net increase in other deposits		3,814			7,050

Net cash provided by financing activities		6,528			9,407


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		12,029			9,898
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		13,726			10,488

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	25,755		$	20,386


SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	1,126		$	1,766

Income taxes paid	$	950		$	620

Transfer of loans to real estate owned	$	720		$	653

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. The Company and its Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not contain all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The financial data at December 31, 2010 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements that are included in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010. The financial data at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and 2010 are derived from unaudited consolidated financial statements. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiary, CommerceFirst Bank (the “Bank”). Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows include cash on hand, non-interest bearing amounts due from correspondent banks, interest and non-interest bearing deposits due from the Federal Reserve, ~~certificates~~certificate of ~~deposit~~deposits with maturities of less than one year and Federal funds sold, if any.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s method of presentation.

Note 2. Fair value

ASC Section 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The hierarchy of valuation techniques is based on whether the inputs to those ~~valuation~~ valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels as follows:

	*Level 1:*		Quoted prices in active exchange markets for identical assets or liabilities; also includes certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

	*Level 2:*		Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in less active markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data; also includes derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with observable market inputs or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. government and agency securities, corporate debt securities, derivative instruments, and residential mortgage loans held for sale.

	*Level 3:*		Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation; also includes observable inputs for single dealer nonbinding quotes not corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained interests from securitizations, and certain collateralized debt obligations.

The Company’s bond holdings in the investment securities portfolio, if any, are the only asset or liability subject to fair value measurement on a recurring basis. No financial assets or liabilities are valued on a recurring basis under Level 1or Level 2 inputs at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 or December 31, 2010. The Company has financial and non-financial assets measured by fair value measurements on a non-recurring basis during 2011. At ~~March~~ June 3130, 2011, these assets include $76.17 million of non-accrual loans ($5.20 million after specific reserves) and other real estate owned of $23.83 million all of which are valued under Level 3 inputs.

The changes in the assets subject to fair value measurements are summarized below by Level:

	Level 1 and
	Level 1
	and
In thousands	Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2010:
Loans	$	—	$	7,283
Other real estate owned		—		3,324
Total December 31, 2010		—		10,607
Activity:
Loans:
New loans measured at fair value		—		~~753~~1,978
Payments and other loan reductions		—		(~~618~~652	)
Loans charged-off		—		(275	)
Foreclosed — to other real estate owned		—		(720	)
Net change in loans		—		(140	)
Loans charged-off		—		(1,182	)
Net change in loans		—		(576	)
Other real estate owned:
Sales of other real estate owned				(450	)
Additions to other real estate owned		—		806
Provision for valuation reduction		—		(75	)
Sales of other real estate owned		—		(673	)
		—		(525	)
Provision for valuation reduction		—		(125	)
March 31, 2011:
Net change in other real estate owned		—		8
Loans		—		7,143
June 30, 2011:
Other real estate owned		—		2,799
Loans		—		6,707
Total March 31, 2011	$	—	$	9,942
Other real estate owned		—		3,332
Total June 30, 2011	$	—	$	10,039

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below. The fair values of a significant portion of these financial instruments are estimates derived using present value techniques and may not be indicative of the net realizable or liquidation values. Also, the calculation of estimated fair values is based on market conditions at a specific point in time and may not reflect current or future fair values.

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
In thousands	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	2,~~860~~072	$	2,~~860~~072	$	1,437	$	1,437
Interest bearing deposits		1223,~~519~~683		1223,~~519~~683		12,289		12,289
Investments in restricted stock		527		527		527		527
Loans, net		~~184~~177,~~072~~249		~~193~~186,~~480~~943		181,709		191,353
Accrued interest receivable		~~761~~721		~~761~~721		750		750
Financial liabilities:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	2526,~~442~~474	$	2526,~~442~~474	$	23,760	$	23,760
Interest bearing deposits		~~157~~160,~~227~~164		~~158~~161,~~609~~747		156,350		157,228
Accrued interest payable		~~117~~98		~~117~~98		106		106
Off-balance sheet commitments		—		—		—		—

Fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments or estimated using discounted cash flows. The discounts used are estimated using comparable market rates for similar types of instruments adjusted to be commensurate with the credit risk, overhead costs and optionality of such instruments.

The fair value of cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits, federal funds sold, investments in restricted stocks and accrued interest receivable are equal to the carrying amounts. The fair values of investment securities are determined using market quotations. The fair value of loans receivable is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis.

The fair value of non-interest bearing deposits, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market deposit accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and accrued interest payable are equal to the carrying amounts. The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis.

Note 3. Net Income per Common Share

Basic earnings per share of common stock are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are calculated by including the average dilutive common equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of stock options and warrants, calculated using the treasury stock method.

	Three Months
	Six Months				Three Months
	Ended March 31,
	Ended June 30,				Ended June 30,
In thousands except for per share data	2011		2010
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Weighted average shares outstanding		1,820,548		1,820,548		1,820,548		1,820,548
Common stock equivalents		—		—		—		—
Average common shares and equivalents		1,820,548		1,820,548		1,822,548		1,822,548
Net income (in thousands)	$	448	$	528
Net income	$	901	$	916	$	453	$	388
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.25	$	0.29
Basic earnings per share	$	0.49	$	0.50	$	0.25	$	0.21
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.49	$	0.50	$	0.25	$	0.21

~~All~~During 2010, all of the outstanding warrants and options were excluded from the calculation of diluted income per share ~~in 2010~~ because they were anti-dilutive. All of the warrants and options expired in 2010.

Note 4. Related Party Transactions

The Company paid $3048 thousand during the first ~~three~~six months of 2011 for legal services to a firm of which a Director of the Company is a principal. The Company also paid $1124 thousand during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 for computer related services to a firm of which a Director is a principal. The above transactions have been consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arms length transactions.

Executive officers, directors and their affiliated interests enter into loan transactions with the Company in the ordinary course of business. These loans are made on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with unrelated borrowers. They do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable terms. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 the amounts of such loans outstanding were $2.8 million.

Deposit balances of executive officers, directors and their affiliated interests totaled $1211.4 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

Note 5. Commitments and contingencies

The Company is a party to financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments typically include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Outstanding commitments as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 are as follows:

In millions
Loan commitments	$	56.23
Unused lines of credit	$	34.17
Letters of Credit	$	1.32

Note 6. Recent Relevant Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310), Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The main objective of this ASU is to provide financial statement users with greater transparency about an entity’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The ASU requires that entities provide additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing their credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. For the Company, the disclosures as of the end of a reporting period were required for the annual reporting periods ended December 31, 2010. Required disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2011. The adoption of this ASU resulted in additional disclosures in the Company’s financial statements regarding its loan portfolio and related allowance for loan losses but does not change the accounting for loans or the allowance. The Company has complied with the reporting requirements as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

~~The~~In ~~FASB~~April 2011, ~~has~~the FASB issued ~~several~~ASU ~~exposure drafts which~~No. 2011-02, ifReceivable ~~adopted~~(Topic 310), ~~would~~A ~~significantly alter the Company~~Creditor’s ~~(and all other financial institutions’) method~~ Determination of ~~accounting~~Whether ~~for,~~a ~~and~~Restructuring ~~reporting,~~is ~~its financial~~a ~~assets~~Troubled ~~and~~Debt ~~some~~Restructuring. ~~liabilities~~The ~~from~~main aobjective ~~historical~~of ~~cost~~the ~~method~~ASU is to clarify a ~~fair~~creditor’s ~~value~~evaluation ~~method~~ of ~~accounting~~ aswhether ~~well~~in asmodifying ~~the~~a ~~reported~~loan ~~amount~~it ofhas ~~net~~granted ~~interest~~a ~~income.~~concession ~~Also,~~in circumstances ~~the~~that ~~FASB~~qualify ~~has~~the ~~issued~~loan ~~an exposure~~as ~~draft regarding~~ a ~~change~~Troubled inDebt ~~the~~Restructured ~~accounting for leases~~(TDR) loan. ~~Under~~These ~~this~~loans ~~exposure draft, the~~are ~~total~~subject ~~amount~~to ofvarious ~~“lease~~accounting ~~rights”~~ and ~~total~~disclosure ~~amount~~requirements. ofThe ~~future~~ASU ~~payments~~is ~~required~~effective ~~under~~for ~~all~~the ~~leases would~~first beinterim ~~reflected~~or onannual ~~the~~period ~~balance~~beginning ~~sheets~~on ofor ~~all~~after ~~entities~~June 15, as2011, ~~assets~~ and ~~debt.~~should Ifbe ~~the~~applied ~~changes under~~retrospectively ~~discussion~~to inthe ~~either~~beginning of ~~these~~the ~~exposure~~annual ~~drafts~~period ~~are~~of ~~adopted,~~adoption. ~~the~~Certain ~~financial~~disclosures ~~statements~~are ofrequired ~~the~~for ~~Company~~loans ~~could~~considered beas ~~materially~~TDR ~~impacted~~loans asresulting tofrom the ~~amounts~~application of ~~recorded~~the ~~assets,~~ASU ~~liabilities,~~that ~~capital,~~were ~~net interest~~not ~~income,~~considered ~~interest~~TDR under ~~expense,~~prior ~~depreciation expense, rent expense and net income~~guidance. The Company has ~~not~~complied ~~determined~~with ~~the~~ASU ~~extent of the possible changes at this time~~No. 2011-02 ~~The~~as ~~exposure drafts are in different stages~~ of ~~review~~June 30, ~~approval and possible adoption~~2011.

In ~~April~~May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-0204, ~~Receivable~~Fair Value Measurement (Topic ~~310~~820), AAmendments ~~Creditor’s Determination~~to ofAchieve ~~Whether~~Common aFair ~~Restructuring~~Value isMeasurement aand ~~Troubled~~Disclosure ~~Debt~~Requirements ~~Restructuring~~in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The main objective of the ASU is to ~~clarify~~ aconform ~~creditor’s~~the ~~evaluation~~requirements offor ~~whether~~measuring infair ~~modifying~~value aand ~~loan,~~the itdisclosure information ~~has~~under ~~granted~~U.S. agenerally ~~concession~~accepted inaccounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial ~~circumstances~~Reporting ~~that~~Standards ~~qualify~~(IFRS). The amendments change the ~~loan~~wording asused ato ~~Troubled~~describe ~~Debt~~many ~~Restructured~~of ~~(TDR) loan~~the requirements in U.S. ~~These~~GAAP ~~loans~~for ~~are~~measuring fair value and for the disclosure about fair value ~~subject~~measurements. toOther ~~various~~amendments ~~accounting~~clarify existing requirements and ~~disclosure~~change particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements. The ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after ~~June~~December 15, 2011, ~~and should be applied retrospectively~~ toearly ~~the~~application ~~beginning~~for ofpublic ~~the~~entities ~~annual~~is ~~period~~not ~~of adoption~~permitted. ~~Certain~~The ~~disclosures~~Company ~~are~~will ~~required~~review ~~for loans considered as TDR loans resulting from~~ the ~~application~~requirements of ~~the~~ ASU ~~that~~No. 2011-04 ~~were~~and ~~not~~comply ~~considered~~with ~~TDR under~~its ~~prior guidance~~requirements. The ~~Company~~adoption ~~has not yet determined the effect, if any,~~ of ~~the~~this ASU onis ~~its financial~~not ~~statements;~~expected ~~however,~~to ithave a ~~will~~material ~~comply~~impact ~~with~~on the ~~new~~Company’s ~~guidance~~consolidated asfinancial ~~required.~~statements

The FASB has issued several exposure drafts which, if adopted, would significantly alter the Company’s (and all other financial institutions’) method of accounting for, and reporting, its financial assets and some liabilities from a historical cost method to a fair value method of accounting as well as the reported amount of net interest income. Also, the FASB has issued an exposure draft regarding a change in the accounting for leases. Under this exposure draft, the total amount of “lease rights” and total amount of future payments required under all leases would be reflected on the balance sheets of all entities as assets and debt. If the changes under discussion in either of these exposure drafts are adopted, the financial statements of the Company could be materially impacted as to the amounts of recorded assets, liabilities, capital, net interest income, interest expense, depreciation expense, rent expense and net income. The Company has not determined the extent of the possible changes at this time. The exposure drafts are in different stages of review, approval and possible adoption. The FASB is scheduled to complete their deliberations by year end, December 31, 2011.


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain information contained in this discussion may include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by phrases such as “the Company expects,” “the Company believes” or words of similar import. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks including, but not limited to, changes in general economic and business conditions, interest rate fluctuations, competition within and from outside the banking industry, new products and services in the banking industry, risk inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values, problems with technology utilized by the Company, changing trends in customer profiles and changes in laws, accounting standards and regulations applicable to the Company. Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reliable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned against placing undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. The Company’s past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance. Please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for a discussion of various factors which may affect our performance.

General

CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is the bank holding company for CommerceFirst Bank, a Maryland chartered commercial bank headquartered in Annapolis, Maryland (the “Bank”). The Bank was capitalized, became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and commenced operations on June 29, 2000. The Company’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “CMFB”. The Company maintains five banking offices in Anne Arundel, Howard and Prince George’s counties in central Maryland. The Company focuses on providing commercial banking services to small and medium sized business in its market areas.

The Company’s assets increased modestly at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 from December 31, 2010 with increases in cash and cash equivalents ~~and~~offset by a decline in loans receivable. Earnings ~~declined~~were substantially the same as the six month period ended June 30, 2010 as the increase in the provision for loan losses, write-downs on other real estate owned and loan collections expenses offset improvements in net interest income. The provision for loan losses continues to ~~remain~~be ~~relatively~~ high in recognition of the effect of uncertain economic conditions on the Company’s borrowers and collateral values as well as loan charge-offs. Key measurements and events for the period include the following:

• The Company’s net income was $~~448~~901 thousand during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 as compared to net income of $~~528~~916 thousand for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. The $8015 thousand decline in net income is primarily attributable to increases in the provision for loan losses, anthe ~~established~~write-downs ~~valuation~~of ~~allowance for~~ other real estate owned and increased loan collection expenses. • Net interest income, the Company’s main source of income, increased by 11.3% from $2.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 to $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. • Total assets increased by 1.7% from $203 million at December 31, 2010 to $206 million at March 31, 2011. • Net loans outstanding increased by 1.3% from $182 million at December 31, 2010 to $184 million as of March 31, 2011. • Deposits increased by 1.4% from $180 million at December 31, 2010 to $183 million at March 31, 2011. • Non-interest income increased by 15.9% from $346 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2010 to $401 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2011. • Non-interest expenses increased by 17.6% from $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 to $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

•

Net interest income, the Company’s main source of income, increased by 9.1% from $4.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

•

Total assets increased by 3.7% from $203 million at December 31, 2010 to $211 million at June 30, 2011.

•

Net loans outstanding decreased by 2.5% from $182 million at December 31, 2010 to $177 million as of June 30, 2011.

•

Deposits increased by 3.6% from $180 million at December 31, 2010 to $187 million at June 30, 2011.

•

Non-interest income increased by 11.2% from $616 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $685 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

•

Non-interest expenses increased by 10.6% from $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

A discussion of the factors leading to these changes can be found in the discussion below.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available.

The most significant accounting policies followed by CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc. are presented in Note 1 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses as the accounting area that requires the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.

The Company believes it has developed appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio. These procedures include identifying and assessing possible impaired loans. The Company’s assessments may be affected in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of regulatory examinations and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers that is not known to management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General. The Company reported net income of $~~448~~901 thousand for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 as as compared to net income of $~~528~~916 thousand for the ~~three~~six month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010. ~~Net~~Earnings ~~earnings~~ declined slightly during 2011 as compared to 2010 inas ~~spite of~~ the increase in net interest ~~margin~~income was ~~because~~largely ofoffset anby the increase in the provision for loan losses of $~~234~~274 thousand, ~~expensed~~write-downs ~~valuation~~of ~~allowance for declines in~~ other real estate owned of $75125 thousand and loan collection expenses of $5789 thousand. Net interest margin increased primarily as the result of the reduction in the cost of deposits. The provision for loan losses was $~~681~~1.3 million ~~thousand~~ during 2011 as compared to $~~447~~1.0 million ~~thousand~~ in 2010, an increase of $~~234~~274 thousand, or 5226.45%. The Company continues to experience the detrimental effects of the weakened economy on its loan customers which effects are recognized through the Company’s provision for loan losses and loan charge-offs. The amount of non-accrual loans decreased by $~~140~~576 thousand, or 17.9%, at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010.

Net interest income increased by $416 thousand, or 9.1%, in 2011 as compared to 2010 ~~by $255 thousand, or 11~~.~~3%.~~ This increase resulted primarily from the reduction in the cost of deposits. During the second half of 2010 and the first half of 2011 a significant amount of high interest rate, longer term certificates of deposit matured and were either re-priced at lower rates or replaced with lower rate accounts resulting in decreases in costs of funds, increases in net interest income, net interest margin and net interest spread. However, the amount of such certificates available to be re-priced in future quarters is minimal.

Return on Average Assets and Average Equity. The following table shows the return on average assets and average equity for the period shown.

	Three Months Ended						Year ended
	March 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2010
Return on Average Equity		7.87	%		9.89	%		8.61	%
Return on Average Earning Assets		0.91	%		1.06	%		0.94	%
Ratio of Average Equity to Average Assets		11.19	%		10.36	%		10.62	%

Return on Average Assets and Average Equity. The following table shows the return on average assets and average equity for the period shown.


	Six Months Ended						Year ended
	June 30,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2010

Return on Average Equity		7.90	%		8.55	%		8.61	%

Return on Average Earning Assets		0.91	%		0.91	%		0.94	%

Ratio of Average Equity to Average Assets		11.18	%		10.36	%		10.62	%

Six months ended June 30, 2011

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin. Net interest income is the amount by which interest earned on assets exceeds the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s principal interest earning assets are loans to businesses. Interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. Generally, changes in net interest income are measured by net interest rate spread and net interest margin. Net interest rate spread is equal to the difference between the average rate earned on interest earning assets and the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin represents the difference between interest income (including net loan fees earned) and interest expense calculated as a percentage of average earning assets.

Total interest income decreased by $63213 thousand or 23.04% to $36.1 million for the ~~three~~six month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease in interest income was primarily attributable to the decline in the yield on the loans from 6.8831% in 2010 to 6.6616% in 2011. ~~Further, interest income declined because of the $2.0 million decrease in average earning~~ ~~assets during 2011 as compared to. Interest income was adversely affected by the 6 basis point decline in the yield of the average earning assets from 6.37% in 2010 to 6.31% in 2011.~~

Interest expense decreased by $~~318~~629 thousand or 3536.90% to $~~568~~1.1 million ~~thousand~~ for the ~~three~~six months ended June ~~March 31~~30, 2011 as compared to $~~886~~1.7 million ~~thousand~~ during the same ~~three~~six months of 2010. This decrease ~~was~~ was primarily attributable to the 7270 basis point decrease in the cost of funds from 2.214% during the first ~~three~~six months of 2010 to 1.544% during the first ~~three~~six months of 2011. Also contributing to the reduction in the cost of funds was $8.12 million decrease in average interest bearing liabilities during 2011 as compared to 2010.

The net interest income for the ~~three~~six month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 was $2.5.0 million as ~~compared~~ compared to $24.36 million for the same period in 2010. Net interest income increased primarily because of the reduced cost of funds during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2010.

The following table shows the average balances and average rates earned or paid on of the various categories of the Company’s assets and liabilities for the ~~three~~six month period ended ~~March~~June 3130 of ~~each~~ each year. Nonperforming loans are included in average loan balances in the following table:

	2011								2010								2009
THREE MONTHS	Average					Yields/			Average					Yields/			Average					Yields/
SIX MONTHS	Average					Yields/			Average					Yields/			Average					Yields/
In thousands	Balance			Interest		Rates			Balance			Interest		Rates			Balance			Interest		Rates
Assets
Securities (1)	$	527		$	714		5.3936	%	$	527		$	714		5.3936	%	$	3,539		$	3979		4.4752	%
Loans, net of unearned income (2)		~~186~~185,~~284~~485			36,~~057~~075		6.6660	%		184,~~219~~116			36,~~124~~292		6.8889	%		~~156~~150,~~328~~151			25,~~710~~586		7.03	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		1114,~~036~~304			1328		0.4839	%		1417,~~927~~748			924		0.2427	%		16,~~966~~163			28		0.4126	%
Federal funds sold		—			—		—			~~129~~64			—		0.19	%		31,~~277~~726			32		0.3723	%
Total interest-earning assets		~~197~~200,~~847~~316			36,~~077~~117		6.3116	%		~~199~~202,~~802~~455			36,~~140~~330		6.3731	%		~~165~~171,~~984~~563			25,~~754~~675		6.7667	%
Less allowance for loan losses		(3,~~319~~538	)							(2,~~428~~391	)							(2,~~035~~126	)
Non interest earning assets		98,~~127~~996								8,~~631~~565								65,~~909~~571
Total assets	$	~~203~~205,~~655~~774							$	~~206~~208,~~005~~629							$	~~169~~175,~~984~~008
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	~~766~~712		$	—		0.05	%	$	~~712~~724		$	—		0.05	%	$	12,~~842~~190		$	—1		0.0009	%
Money market deposit accounts		8,~~628~~640			816		0.3837	%		8,~~453~~022			920		0.4350	%		1813,~~093~~539			2636		0.5854	%
Savings accounts		23,~~780~~848			67137		1.1416	%		1213,~~036~~496			44101		1.4851	%		~~175~~560			—4		—1.44	%
Certificates of deposit		~~122~~123,~~695~~425			~~493~~965		1.6358	%		142,~~729~~589			~~833~~1,626		2.3730	%		~~109~~115,~~954~~811			12,~~138~~302		4.2001	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		~~155~~156,~~869~~625			~~568~~1,118		1.4844	%		~~163~~164,~~930~~831			~~886~~1,747		2.1914	%		~~130~~132,~~064~~100			12,~~164~~343		3.6358	%
Demand deposits and other liabilities		2526,~~005~~141								2022,~~727~~192								1922,~~543~~542
Total liabilities		~~180~~182,~~874~~766								~~184~~187,~~657~~023								~~149~~154,~~607~~642
Stockholders’ equity		2223,~~781~~008								21,~~348~~606								20,~~377~~366
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	~~203~~205,~~655~~774							$	~~206~~208,~~005~~629							$	~~169~~175,~~984~~008
Interest rate spread							4.8372	%							4.1817	%							3.1309	%
Net interest income and margin				$	24,~~509~~999		5.1403	%				$	24,~~254~~583		4.5856	%				$	13,~~590~~332		3.9192	%


(1)		Yields on securities are calculated based on amortized cost.

(2)		Loan balances include loans on nonaccrual

Net interest margin was 5.1403% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2011, as compared to 4.5856% in the comparable period in 2010. Interest spread was 4.8372% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2011, as compared to the 4.1817% in the first ~~three~~six months of 2010 reflecting the ~~greater~~larger reduction in the cost of interest bearing funds as compared to the reduction of the earnings rates of interest earning assets. Absent a reduction in market interest rates, the Company does not anticipate continuing significant reductions in the cost of its interest bearing funds as asubstantially ~~majority~~all of the higher costing funds have been re-priced to lower levels.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense of the Company. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to: (i) changes in volume (change in volume of the asset multiplied by the prior year’s rate) and (ii) changes in rates (change in rate multiplied by the current year’s volume).

	March 31, 2011 vs. 2010									March 31, 2010 vs. 2009
	Increase (Decrease)									Increase (Decrease)
In thousands	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest-Earning Assets:
Federal funds sold	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(3	)	$	—		$	(3	)
Interest bearing deposits		(2	)		6			4			14			(7	)		7
Investment portfolio		—			—			—			(33	)		1			(32	)
Loans receivable		35			(102	)		(67	)		484			(70	)		414
Net Change in Interest Income		33			(96	)		(63	)		462			(76	)		386
Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits		(44	)		(274	)		(318	)		318			(596	)		(278	)
Net Change in Interest Expense		(44	)		(274	)		(318	)		318			(596	)		(278	)
Change in Net Interest Income	$	77		$	178		$	255		$	144		$	520		$	664

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents the amount charged against earnings to increase the allowance for loan losses to the level deemed appropriate by management. The provision for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses are based on management’s ongoing assessment of the Company’s credit exposure and consideration of certain other relevant factors. The provision for loan losses was $681 thousand the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to $447 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The Company has increased its provision for loan losses to address identified loan concerns and in recognition of the detrimental effect of the weakened economy. The allowance is comprised of specific and general allowance amounts.


	June 30, 2011 vs. 2010									June 30, 2010 vs. 2009
	Increase (Decrease)									Increase (Decrease)
In thousand	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Interest-Earning Assets:
Loans receivable	$	47		$	(264	)	$	(217	)	$	836		$	(130	)	$	706
Interest bearing deposits		(5	)		9			4			14			2			16
Federal funds sold		—			—			—			(2	)		—			(2	)

Net Change in Interest Income		42			(255	)		(213	)		781			(126	)		655


Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits		(72	)		(557	)		(629	)		511			(1,107	)		(596	)

Net Change in Interest Expense		(72	)		(557	)		(629	)		511			(1,107	)		(596	)

Change in Net Interest Income	$	114		$	302		$	416		$	270		$	981		$	1,251

~~Non-Interest~~Provision ~~Income.~~for ~~Non-interest~~Loan ~~income~~Losses. ~~principally~~The ~~consists~~provision offor ~~gains~~loan ~~from~~losses represents the ~~sale~~amount ofcharged ~~the~~against ~~guaranteed~~earnings ~~portion~~to ofincrease ~~Small~~the ~~Business~~allowance ~~Administration~~for ~~loans~~loan ~~and~~losses ~~from~~to ~~deposit account services charges. For~~ the ~~three~~level ~~months~~deemed ~~ended~~appropriate ~~March 31,~~by ~~2011,~~management. The ~~gains~~provision onfor ~~sales~~loan oflosses and the ~~guaranteed~~allowance ~~portion~~for ofloan ~~SBA loans~~losses ~~was~~are ~~$209~~based ~~thousand whereas gains~~ on ~~sales~~management’s ~~of SBA loans amounted to $225 thousand during the~~ongoing ~~first~~assessment ~~three months~~ of ~~2010. Generally,~~ the Company’s ~~desires~~credit toexposure ~~sell~~and ~~the~~consideration ~~guaranteed portion~~ of ~~most additional~~certain ~~SBA~~other ~~loans~~relevant ~~resulting in a continuing stream of income that may vary significantly from quarter to quarter, depending in part upon the volume of loans actually sold~~factors. ~~Deposit account~~ ~~service~~The ~~charges~~provision ~~and~~for ~~other~~loan ~~income~~losses ~~amounted~~was to $~~149~~1.3 million ~~thousand during~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 as compared to $~~121~~1.0 million ~~thousand~~ for the ~~same~~six ~~period~~months inended ~~2010~~June 30, ~~reflecting~~2010. anThe ~~increase~~Company inhas ~~the~~increased ~~number of~~its ~~accounts~~provision ~~subject~~for loan losses to ~~service~~address ~~charges~~identified onloan ~~such~~concerns ~~deposit~~and ~~accounts. Also included~~ in ~~this~~recognition ~~increase~~of ~~was~~ the ~~increase~~detrimental ineffect ~~net~~of ~~rental~~the weakened ~~income~~economy. ~~from~~The ~~rental~~allowance is comprised of ~~other~~specific ~~real~~and ~~estate~~general ~~owned~~allowance ~~properties~~amounts.

Non-Interest ~~Expense~~Income. ~~Total non~~Non-interest ~~expenses~~income ~~increased~~principally byconsists ~~$224~~of ~~thousand~~gains ~~during~~from the ~~three~~sale of the ~~month~~guaranteed ~~period~~portion of Small Business Administration loans and sales of other real estate owned as well as from deposit account services charges. For the six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, asgains ~~compared~~on sales of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans were $343 thousand whereas gains on sales of SBA loans amounted to $370 thousand during the ~~same~~first ~~period~~six inmonths of 2010. Generally, the Company desires to sell the guaranteed portion of most additional SBA loans resulting in a ~~17.6%~~continuing ~~increase.~~stream ~~The~~of income ~~2011~~that ~~expenses~~may ~~reflect~~vary ~~$75~~significantly ~~thousand~~from quarter to quarter, depending in part upon the volume of ~~provision~~loans actually ~~for~~sold. ~~declining~~The ~~value~~Company had gains from the sales of other real estate owned; noof $52 thousand in ~~such~~the ~~provision~~first ~~was~~six ~~expensed~~months of 2011. There were no sales of other real estate owned in 2010. ~~Loan~~Deposit account ~~collection~~service ~~expenses~~charges ~~increased~~and byother ~~$41~~income ~~thousand~~amounted ~~from~~to $16 290 thousand during ~~2010~~the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $57246 thousand for the same period in ~~2011~~2010, ~~resulting~~reflecting ~~from~~an ~~increased~~increase ~~loan~~in ~~collection~~the number ~~efforts~~of accounts subject to service charges on such deposit accounts.

~~Income~~Non-Interest ~~Tax~~ Expense. ~~During~~Total non-interest expenses increased by $279 thousand during the ~~three~~six ~~months~~month period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, ~~the~~as ~~Company~~compared ~~recorded~~to anthe ~~income tax~~same ~~expense~~period ofin ~~$281~~2010, ~~thousand~~a as10.6% ~~compared~~increase. toThe a2011 expenses reflect $~~349~~125 thousand ~~expense~~of ~~during~~write-downs ~~the~~of ~~same~~other ~~period~~real inestate ~~2010.~~owned reflecting declining ~~The~~market ~~income~~values; ~~tax~~no ~~expense~~such provision was 38expensed in 2010.6% ofLoan ~~income~~collection ~~before~~expenses ~~taxes~~increased inby ~~2011~~$52 thousand ~~and~~from ~~39.8%~~$37 ofthousand ~~income~~during ~~before~~2010 ~~taxes~~to $89 thousand in 2011 resulting from increased loan ~~2010~~collection efforts.

~~FINANCIAL~~Income ~~CONDITION~~Tax Expense. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $556 thousand as compared to a $609 thousand expense during the same period in 2010. The income tax expense was 38.2% of income before taxes in 2011 and 39.9% of income before taxes in 2010.

~~General.~~Three ~~The~~months ~~Company’s~~ended ~~assets at March~~June 3130, 2011 ~~were $206.5 million, an increase of $3.4 million or~~ 1.7%, from December 31, 2010. The gross loans totaled $187.7 million at March 31, 2011 and are comprised of real estate loans of $132.7 million, an increase of $2.1 million, or 1.6%, from December 31, 2010 and commercial loans of $52.3 million, an increase of $.7 million, or 1.3% from December 31, 2010. The changes noted above reflect the effect of reclassifying approximately $9.5 million of commercial loans to real estate loans during the second quarter of 2010. The reclassification resulted from a review by the Company of the risk profile of the loan portfolio. The majority of the reclassified loans are to entities whose cash flow is directly or indirectly significantly dependent upon the sale, refinance, or management of real estate assets or collections of the entities’ financing of real estate. None of these loans were on non-accrual or classified as substandard at the time of reclassification. At March 31, 2011, deposits totaled $182.7 million, an increase of $2.6 million, or 1.4%, from December 31, 2010. Deposits at March 31, 2011 are comprised primarily of certificates of deposit of $124.6 million, NOW and Money Market accounts of $8.9 million, savings accounts of $23.8 million and noninterest bearing deposits of $25.4 million.

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin. Total interest income decreased by $150 thousand or 4.7% to $3.0 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease in interest income was primarily attributable to the decline in the yield on the loans from 6.90% in 2010 to 6.55% in 2011.. Interest income was adversely affected by the 23 basis point decline in the yield of the average earning assets from 6.24% in 2010 to 6.01% in 2011.

~~Loan~~Interest ~~Portfolio.~~expense ~~The~~decreased ~~loan~~by ~~portfolio~~$311 isthousand ~~the~~or ~~largest~~36.1% ~~component~~to of$550 ~~earning~~thousand ~~assets and accounts~~ for the ~~greatest~~ ~~portion~~three ofmonths ~~total interest income. At March~~ended June 3130, 2011, ~~net~~as ~~loans~~compared ~~were~~to $~~184.1 million,~~861 ~~a 1.3%~~thousand ~~increase~~during ~~from~~ the ~~$181.7 million~~same inthree ~~loans~~months ~~outstanding~~of ~~at December 31,~~ 2010. ~~Generally,~~This ~~loans are~~decrease ~~internally generated but the Company does periodically purchase loan participations from other~~was ~~local~~primarily ~~community~~attributable ~~banks. Lending activity is generally confined~~ to the ~~Company’s~~68 ~~immediate~~basis ~~market areas.~~point ~~The~~decrease ~~$2.4 million increase~~ in ~~loans is net of~~ the ~~sales~~cost of ~~SBA~~funds ~~guaranteed~~from ~~portions~~2.08% ofduring ~~loans~~the infirst ~~the~~three ~~amount~~months of ~~$2.~~2010 to 1 ~~million~~.4% during the first three ~~quarter~~months of 2011. ~~Without~~Also ~~these~~contributing ~~sales, loan balances would have increased by $4.5 million. The Company is continuing its efforts~~ to ~~attract~~the ~~quality credits~~reduction ~~with~~in nothe ~~dilution~~cost of ~~credit~~funds ~~underwriting~~was ~~standards~~$8. ~~The current economic conditions have~~3 million ~~reduced~~decrease ~~the~~in ~~number~~average ofinterest ~~loan~~bearing ~~requests~~liabilities asduring ~~well~~2011 as ~~the~~compared ~~number~~to ~~of applicants that meet the Company’s underwriting standards~~2010.

The ~~percentage~~net ofinterest ~~total~~income ~~loans~~for ~~comprised of commercial real estate loans has increased as~~ the ~~Company~~ ~~has~~three ~~concentrated~~month onperiod ~~this~~ended ~~type~~June 30, of2011 ~~lending~~was $2.5 million ~~The~~as ~~majority of these loans are secured by real~~compared ~~property~~to ~~that is occupied by the borrowers’ businesses. The Company has approximately~~ $02.93 million of ~~acquisition~~for ~~and~~the ~~construction~~same ~~loans~~period ~~secured by residential building lots. The Company does not engage~~ in ~~foreign lending activities~~2010. ~~Loans~~Net ~~secured~~interest byincome ~~residential~~increased ~~real~~primarily ~~estate~~because ~~are loans to~~of ~~investors~~the ~~for~~reduced ~~commercial~~cost ~~purposes.~~of ~~The Bank does not lend~~ funds toduring ~~consumers. The following table presents~~ the ~~composition~~three ofmonths ~~the~~ended ~~loan~~June 30, ~~portfolio~~2011 byas ~~type~~compared ofto ~~loan~~the atthree months ~~the~~ended ~~dates~~June 30, ~~indicated~~2010.

~~Loans~~The ~~receivable,~~following ~~net~~table isshows ~~comprised~~the average balances and average rates earned or paid on of the various categories of the Company’s assets and liabilities for the three month period ended June 30 of each year. Nonperforming loans are included in average loan balances in the following table:

	March 31, 2011						March 31, 2010						December 31, 2010
	2011									2010									2009
				Percentage						Percentage						Percentage
THREE MONTHS	Average						Yields/			Average						Yields/			Average					Yields/
(In thousands)	Balance			of Loans			Balance			of Loans			Balance			of Loans
In thousands	Balance			Interest			Rates			Balance			Interest			Rates			Balance			Interest		Rates
Commercial and Industrial loans	$	45,956			24.5	%	$	59,187			34.5	%	$	44,582			24.1	%
Assets
SBA loans		7,071			3.8	%		6,933			2.4	%		7,742			4.2	%
Securities (1)	$	527		$	7			5.33	%	$	527		$	7			5.33	%	$	3,508		$	39		4.46	%
Real estate loans:
Loans, net of unearned income (2)		184,767			3,018			6.55	%		184,079			3,168			6.90	%		163,937			2,876		7.04	%
Owner occupied		85,296			45.4	%		72,918			39.5	%		85,633			46.3	%
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		17,516			15			0.34	%		20,520			15			0.29	%		8,807			6		0.27	%
Non owner occupied		49,449			26.3	%		45,897			23.6	%		47,040			25.4	%
Federal funds sold		—			—			—			—			—			—			191			0		0.00	%
Total real estate loans		134,745			71.7	%		118,815			63.1	%		132,673			71.7	%
Total interest-earning assets		202,810			3,040			6.01	%		205,126			3,190			6.24	%		176,443			2,921		6.76	%
		187,772			100.0	%		184,935			100.0	%		184,997			100.0	%
Less allowance for loan losses		(3,754	)								(2,355	)								(2,120	)
Unearned loan fees, net		(111	)					(86	)					(114	)
Non interest earning assets		8,819									8,456									5,645
Allowance for loan losses		(3,589	)					(2,376	)					(3,174	)
Total assets	$	207,875								$	211,227								$	179,968
	$	184,072					$	182,473					$	181,709
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	660		$	—			0.05	%	$	737		$	—			0.05	%	$	2,535		$	1		0.16	%
Money market deposit accounts		8,673			8			0.37	%		7,591			11			0.58	%		12,201			10		0.33	%
Savings accounts		23,915			70			1.17	%		14,941			57			1.53	%		941			4		1.70	%
Certificates of deposit		124,126			472			1.53	%		142,449			793			2.23	%		121,651			1,164		3.84	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		157,374			550			1.40	%		165,718			861			2.08	%		137,328			1,179		3.44	%
Demand deposits and other liabilities		27,248									23,646									21,990
Total liabilities		184,622									189,364									159,318
Stockholders’ equity		23,253									21,863									20,650
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	207,875								$	211,227								$	179,968
Interest rate spread								4.61	%								4.15	%							3.20	%
Net interest income and margin				$	2,490			4.92	%				$	2,329			4.55	%				$	1,742		3.96	%

Note: The loan amounts and percentages for March 31, 2010 above do not reflect the effect of reclassifying approximately $9.5 million of commercial and industrial loans to real estate loans during the second quarter of 2010.


(1)		Yields on securities are calculated based on amortized cost.

(2)		Loan balances include loans on nonaccrual

~~Real~~Net ~~estate~~interest ~~loans~~margin ~~are~~was ~~secured~~4.92% byin ~~residential~~the ~~and~~second ~~commercial~~quarter ~~properties~~of 2011, as ~~follows:~~compared to 4.55% in the comparable period in 2010. Interest spread was 4.61% in the second quarter of 2011, as compared to the 4.15% in the second quarter of 2010 reflecting the greater reduction in the cost of interest bearing funds as compared to the reduction of the earnings rates of interest earning assets. Absent a reduction in market interest rates, the Company does not anticipate continuing significant reductions in the cost of its interest bearing funds as substantially all of the higher costing funds have been re-priced to lower levels.

(In thousands)	March 31, 2011		March 31, 2010		December 31, 2010
Real estate loans secured by:
Residential real estate	$	24,908	$	22,747	$	24,307
Commercial real estate		109,837		96,068		108,366
Total real estate loans	$	134,745	$	118,815	$	132,673

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents the amount charged against earnings to increase the allowance for loan losses to the level deemed appropriate by management. The provision for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses are based on management’s ongoing assessment of the Company’s credit exposure and consideration of certain other relevant factors. The provision for loan losses was $627 thousand the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $587 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The Company has increased its provision for loan losses to address identified loan concerns and in recognition of the detrimental effect of the weakened economy. The allowance is comprised of specific and general allowance amounts.

None of the loans secured by residential real estate are owner occupied properties.

~~The~~Non-Interest ~~following~~Income. ~~table~~Non-interest ~~shows~~income principally consists of gains from the ~~interest~~sale ~~rate~~of ~~sensitivity~~the guaranteed portion of Small Business Administration loans and from deposit account services charges. For the ~~loan~~three ~~portfolio~~months atended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011~~. Demand loans~~, gains on sales of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans ~~without~~was a$134 ~~stated~~thousand ~~maturity~~whereas ~~and~~gains ~~overdrafts~~on ~~are~~sales ~~reported~~of asSBA ~~re-pricing~~loans inamounted ~~one~~to ~~year~~$145 thousand during the orsame ~~less~~period in 2010. ~~Floating~~Deposit ~~rate~~account ~~loans~~service ~~are~~charges ~~reported~~and other income amounted to ~~reflect~~$141 thousand during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $126 thousand for the same period ~~until~~in 2010, ~~re-pricing~~reflecting an increase in the number of accounts subject to service charges on such deposit accounts.

	Loan Re-pricing as of March 31, 2011
	1 year				After
In thousands	or less		1-5 years		5 years		Total
Loans with:
Fixed interest rates	$	13,172	$	38,123	$	938	$	52,233
Floating and adjustable interest rates		64,227		71,312		—		135,539
Total loans receivable	$	77,399	$	109,435	$	938	$	187,772

Non-Interest Expense. Total non-interest expenses increased by $54 thousand during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010, a 4.0% increase. The 2011 expenses include $50 thousand of write-downs of other real estate owned reflecting declining values; no such provision was expensed in 2010. Loan collection expenses increased by $11 thousand from $21 thousand during 2010 to $32 thousand in 2011 resulting from increased loan collection efforts.

~~Allowance~~Income ~~for~~Tax ~~loan losses~~Expense. ~~The~~During ~~adequacy of~~ the ~~allowance~~three ~~for~~months ~~loan~~ended ~~losses is evaluated based upon loan categories except for loans rated substandard~~June 30, ~~doubtful or loss~~2011, ~~which are evaluated separately and assigned loss amounts based upon~~ the ~~evaluation.~~Company ~~Loss~~recorded ~~ratios~~an ~~are~~income ~~applied to each~~tax ~~category~~expense of ~~loan~~$275 tothousand ~~determine estimated loss amounts. Categories of loans are identified~~ as ~~commercial,~~ ~~SBA~~compared ~~and~~to ~~mortgage~~a ~~loans.~~$260 ~~Loss~~thousand ~~ratios~~expense ~~are~~during ~~determined based upon historical losses incurred adjusted for~~ the ~~effect~~same ofperiod ~~current economic conditions, any industry concentration or identified weakness~~ in ~~an industry, credit management and underwriting policy changes and secured versus unsecured nature of the loan category~~2010. ~~At March 31, 2011, the range of the loss ratios used~~The toincome ~~determine~~tax ~~estimated~~expense ~~losses~~was ~~by loan category were: commercial loans — 1~~37.18%; ~~SBA~~of ~~loans (unguaranteed~~income ~~portion)~~before —taxes ~~6.9%~~in 2011 and ~~real estate loans- 0~~40.2% toof ~~1.5%.~~income ~~These~~before ~~loss~~taxes ~~ratios are~~in ~~approximately the same as those ratios applied at December 31,~~ 2010. ~~Additional losses are~~ estimated resulting from additional identified risks factors, such as loans with underwriting exceptions, the level and direction of payment delinquencies and the level of large loans. Not all of these additional loss estimates are allocated to the separate loan categories.

~~The~~FINANCIAL Company monitors its loan portfolio for indications of weaknesses through the review of borrowers’ financial condition, cash flows, loan payment delinquencies, economic factors occurring in borrowers’ business sectors and other information which may come to the Company through its contacts in the market placeCONDITION. ~~The determination of the effect of the weaknesses noted on the~~ repayment of the loans is an ongoing process as to each borrower. The Company may set aside specific loss reserves during this process in amounts determined on subjective bases until such time as the collectability of the loan from the borrowers’ primary repayment source(s) is in doubt. During this time, secondary and tertiary repayment sources, including liquidation of collateral, are evaluated which may result in additional specific loss reserves being established. Independent or internal appraisals and evaluations are performed to determine potential recovery amounts, or range of amounts, from the loan collateral and other payment sources. Collateral values are subject to change depending on market factors, collateral condition and method and timing of liquidation efforts. Loans, or portions of loans, for which the Company does not expect to obtain repayment are charged-off. In most cases, the Company has established specific reserves for the amount of the loan’s loss prior to the point of charge-off.

General. The ~~adequacy~~Company’s ofassets ~~the allowance for loan losses is also reviewed~~ at ~~least~~June 30, ~~quarterly~~2011 ~~using~~were ~~risk ratings~~$211 million, ~~applied~~an toincrease ~~the~~of ~~loans based upon rating criteria consistent with regulatory definitions~~$7.5 million or ~~The~~3.7%, ~~risk~~from ~~rating is adjusted~~December 31, as2010. ~~necessary,~~The ifgross loans ~~become~~totaled ~~delinquent,~~$181 million ifat ~~significant~~June 30, ~~adverse information~~2011 ~~is discovered regarding the underlying credit~~ and, inare comprised ~~the case~~ of ~~commercial loans and commercial~~ real estate loans, ~~the normal periodic review~~ of ~~the~~$129 million, ~~underlying credit indicates that~~ a ~~change~~ indecrease ~~risk~~of ~~rating~~$4 million, isor ~~appropriate~~3.1%, Anfrom ~~estimated~~December 31, ~~“low”~~2010 and ~~“high”~~commercial ~~loss~~loans, ~~percentage~~including isSBA ~~applied to~~ loans, inof ~~each~~$52 million, ~~risk~~a ~~rating.~~decrease ~~These~~of ~~loss percentages increase as the loan risk rating increases~~$. ~~Loans rated as substandard~~2 million, ~~doubtful~~ or ~~loss are evaluated separately and assigned loss amounts~~ ~~based~~0.4% ~~upon~~from ~~the~~December 31, ~~separate evaluation~~2010. ~~Risks~~At ~~factors~~June 30, ~~identified beyond individual loan risks~~2011, ~~such~~deposits ~~as economic~~totaled ~~conditions~~$187 million, ~~underwriting~~an ~~exceptions~~increase ~~and loan concentrations are quantified based upon management’s estimations~~ of ~~loss exposure~~$6. ~~Loss percentages used are generally based upon~~5 ~~management’s~~million, ~~best~~or ~~estimates considering losses incurred~~3.6%, ~~Estimated~~from ~~“low”~~December 31, and “high” allowance for loan loss amounts are derived by accumulating the estimated losses using the “low” and “high” loss percentages for each risk rating and adding losses based upon separate loan evaluations and identified other risks2010. ~~The~~Deposits ~~actual allowance for loan losses is compared to this range to ascertain that it is reasonably situated within the range. In addition, on~~ at ~~least a quarterly basis~~June 30, ~~the~~2011 ~~recorded~~are ~~allowance~~comprised ~~for~~primarily ~~loan losses (as a percent~~ of ~~loans) is compared to peer group~~ ~~levels~~certificates toof ~~ascertain~~deposit ~~the reasonableness~~ of ~~the estimate. At March~~$126 31million, ~~2011,~~NOW ~~the~~and ~~actual allowance~~Money ~~for~~Market ~~loan~~accounts ~~losses~~ of ~~1.91%~~$10 million, ~~was~~savings accounts ~~between the “high” allowance amount~~ of ~~1.94%~~$25 million and ~~the~~noninterest ~~low range~~bearing ~~percent~~deposits of 1$26 million.~~69%.~~

Loan Portfolio. The loan portfolio is the largest component of earning assets and accounts for the greatest portion of total interest income. At June 30, 2011, net loans were $177 million, a 2.5% decrease from the $182 million in the net loans at December 31, 2010. Generally, loans are internally generated but the Company does periodically purchase loan participations from other local community banks. Lending activity is generally confined to the Company’s immediate market areas. The $4 million decrease in loans is net of the sales of SBA guaranteed portions of loans in the amount of $5 million during the first half of 2011. Without these sales, loan balances would have increased by $1 million. The Company is continuing its efforts to attract quality credits with no dilution of credit underwriting standards. The current economic conditions have reduced the number of loan requests as well as the number of applicants that meet the Company’s underwriting standards.

The loan portfolio includes a significant amount of commercial real estate loans. The majority of these loans are secured by real property that is occupied by the borrowers’ businesses. The Company has approximately $0.8 million of acquisition and construction loans secured by residential building lots. The Company does not engage in foreign lending activities. Loans secured by residential real estate are loans to investors for commercial purposes. The Bank does not lend funds to consumers. The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.

~~The~~Loans ~~allowance for loan losses represents 1.91% and 1.72% of loans~~ receivable ~~at March 31~~, ~~2011~~net ~~and December 31,~~is ~~2010,~~comprised ~~respectively. The increase in the allowance for loan losses as a percent~~ of ~~loans~~ ~~at March 31, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010 resulted from increased specific reserves as well as general reserves reflecting~~ the ~~effect of the current economic conditions. There was no~~following: change in the methodology of determining the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010 apart from changes to loss factors based on management’s perception of economic environmental factors and trends. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate for each period presented.

The activity in the allowance for loan losses is shown in the following table.


	June 30, 2011						June 30, 2010						December 31, 2010
				Percentage						Percentage						Percentage
(In thousands)	Balance			of Loans			Balance			of Loans			Balance			of Loans
Commercial and Industrial loans	$	44,446			24.6	%	$	48,831			26.3	%	$	44,582			24.1	%
SBA loans		7,742			4.3	%		5,566			3.0	%		7,742			4.2	%
Real estate loans:
Owner occupied		80,373			44.5	%		83,217			44.8	%		85,633			46.3	%
Non owner occupied		48,159			26.6	%		48,160			25.9	%		47,040			25.4	%

Total real estate loans		128,532			71.1	%		131,377			70.7	%		132,673			71.7	%

		180,720			100.0	%		184,774			100.0	%		184,997			100.0	%

Unearned loan fees, net		(100	)					(112	)					(114	)
Allowance for loan losses		(3,371	)					(2,000	)					(3,174	)

	$	177,249					$	182,473					$	181,709

	Three Months
	Ended			Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)	March 31, 2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	3,174		$	2,380		$	1,860		$	1,665		$	1,614
Charge-offs — Commercial and Industrial loans		(85	)		(1,140	)		(500	)		(179	)		(72	)
Charge-offs — SBA loans		(143	)		(447	)		(463	)		(318	)		—
Recoveries — Commercial and Industrial loans		6			26			—			45			78
Recoveries — SBA loans		3			25			5			—			—
Real estate loans:
Charge-offs — Owner occupied		(47	)		—			(138	)		—			—
Charge-offs — Non owner occupied		—			(386	)		—			—			—
Net recoveries (charge-offs)		(266	)		(1,922	)		(1,096	)		(452	)		6
Provision for loan losses		681			2,716			1,616			647			45
Ending balance	$	3,589		$	3,174		$	2,380		$	1,860		$	1,665
Net recoveries (charge-offs) to average loans		(0.14	%)		(1.04	%)		(0.65	%)		(0.33	%)		0.00	%

Real estate loans are secured by residential and commercial properties as follows:

During 2011, loans to seven borrowers and related entities totaling $0.3 million were determined to be uncollectible and were charged-off.


(In thousands)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		December 31, 2010
Real estate loans secured by:
Residential real estate	$	24,687	$	26,649	$	24,307
Commercial real estate		103,845		104,728		108,366

Total real estate loans	$	128,532	$	131,377	$	132,673

~~The~~None ~~activity~~of in the ~~allowance~~loans ~~for~~secured ~~loan losses~~ by ~~category~~residential ~~during~~real ~~the~~estate ~~three~~are ~~months~~owner ~~ended~~occupied ~~March 31, 2011 is shown in the following table~~properties.

					Real Estate Loans
	Commercial						Non-
	and		SBA		Owner		Owner
In thousands	Industrial		Loans		Occupied		Occupied		Unallocated		Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	1,023	$	627	$	682	$	715	$	127	$	3,174
Less loan charge offs		85		143		47		—		—		275
Loss recoveries		6		3		—		—		—		9
Provision for loan losses		367		11		229		63		11		681
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	1,311	$	498	$	864	$	778	$	138	$	3,589
Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	822	$	119	$	646	$	426	$	—	$	2,013
Amount of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,445	$	319	$	8,673	$	3,234	$	—	$	13,671

The following table shows the interest rate sensitivity of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2011. Demand loans, loans without a stated maturity and overdrafts are reported as re-pricing in one year or less. Floating rate loans are reported to reflect the period until re-pricing.


	Loan Re-pricing as of June 30, 2011
	1 year				After
In thousands	or less		1-5 years		5 years		Total
Loans with:
Fixed interest rates	$	11,658	$	36,452	$	1,297	$	49,407
Floating and adjustable interest rates		62,377		68,936		—		131,313

Total loans receivable	$	74,035	$	105,388	$	1,297	$	180,720

Allowance for loan losses. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated based upon loan categories except for loans rated substandard, doubtful or loss, which are evaluated separately and assigned loss amounts based upon the evaluation. Loss ratios are applied to each category of loan to determine estimated loss amounts. Categories of loans are identified as commercial, SBA and mortgage loans. Loss ratios are determined based upon historical losses incurred adjusted for the effect of current economic conditions, any industry concentration or identified weakness in an industry, credit management and underwriting policy changes and secured versus unsecured nature of the loan category. At June 30, 2011, the range of the loss ratios used to determine estimated losses by loan category were: commercial loans — 1.3%; SBA loans (unguaranteed portion) — 6.7% and real estate loans- 0.2% to 0.9%. These loss ratios approximate those ratios applied at December 31, 2010. Additional losses are estimated resulting from additional identified risks factors, such as loans with underwriting exceptions, the level and direction of payment delinquencies and the level of large loans. Not all of these additional loss estimates are allocated to the separate loan categories.

The ~~activity~~Company inmonitors ~~the~~its ~~allowance~~loan portfolio for indications of weaknesses through the review of borrowers’ financial condition, cash flows, loan ~~losses~~payment bydelinquencies, ~~category~~economic factors occurring in borrowers’ business sectors and other information which may come to the Company through its contacts in the market place. The determination of the effect of the weaknesses noted on the repayment of the loans is an ongoing process as to each borrower. The Company may set aside specific loss reserves during this process in amounts determined on subjective bases until such time as the ~~three~~collectability ~~months~~of ~~ended~~the ~~March 31~~loan from the borrowers’ primary repayment source(s) is in doubt. During this time, secondary and tertiary repayment sources, including liquidation of collateral, ~~2010~~are isevaluated ~~shown~~which may result in additional specific loss reserves being established. Independent or internal appraisals and evaluations are performed to determine potential recovery amounts, or range of amounts, from the loan ~~following~~collateral ~~table~~and other payment sources. Collateral values are subject to change depending on market factors, collateral condition and method and timing of liquidation efforts. Loans, or portions of loans, for which the Company does not expect to obtain repayment are charged-off. In most cases, the Company has established specific reserves for the amount of the loan’s loss prior to the point of charge-off.

					Real Estate Loans
	Commercial						Non-
	and		SBA		Owner		Owner
In thousands	Industrial		Loans		Occupied		Occupied		Unallocated			Total
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	1,290	$	576	$	168	$	242	$	104		$	2,380
Loan charge offs		150		325		—		—		—			475
Loss recoveries		21		3		—		—		—			24
Provision for loan losses		198		163		21		78		(13	)		447
Balance at March 31, 2010	$	1,359	$	417	$	189	$	320	$	91		$	2,376
Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	886	$	54	$	22	$	46	$	—		$	988
Amount of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,631	$	256	$	8,725	$	1,854	$	—		$	13,466

The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is also reviewed at least quarterly using risk ratings applied to the loans based upon rating criteria consistent with regulatory definitions. The risk rating is adjusted, as necessary, if loans become delinquent, if significant adverse information is discovered regarding the underlying credit and, in the case of commercial loans and commercial real estate loans, the normal periodic review of the underlying credit indicates that a change in risk rating is appropriate. An estimated “low” and “high” loss percentage is applied to loans in each risk rating. These loss percentages increase as the loan risk rating increases. Loans rated as substandard, doubtful or loss are evaluated separately and assigned loss amounts based upon the separate evaluation. Risks factors identified beyond individual loan risks, such as economic conditions, underwriting exceptions and loan concentrations are quantified based upon management’s estimations of loss exposure. Loss percentages used are generally based upon management’s best estimates considering losses incurred. Estimated “low” and “high” allowance for loan loss amounts are derived by accumulating the estimated losses using the “low” and “high” loss percentages for each risk rating and adding losses based upon separate loan evaluations and identified other risks. The actual allowance for loan losses is compared to this range to ascertain that it is reasonably situated within the range. In addition, on at least a quarterly basis, the recorded allowance for loan losses (as a percent of loans) is compared to peer group levels to ascertain the reasonableness of the estimate. At June 30, 2011, the actual allowance for loan losses of 1.87% of loans was between the “high” allowance amount of 1.88% and the low range percent of 1.62%.

~~Additionally~~The allowance for loan losses represents 1.87% and 1.72% of loans receivable at June 30, ~~the~~2011 ~~Company~~and December 31, ~~has~~2010, ~~established~~respectively. aThe ~~reserve~~increase ~~for~~in ~~unfunded~~the ~~commitments~~allowance ~~that~~for isloan ~~recorded~~losses byas a percent of ~~provision~~loans ~~charged~~at toJune 30, ~~other~~2011 ~~expenses.~~as Atcompared ~~March~~to December 31, ~~2011~~2010 results from increased specific reserves as well as general reserves reflecting the ~~balance~~effect of ~~this~~the ~~reserve~~current ~~was~~economic ~~$60 thousand~~conditions. ~~The~~There ~~reserve,~~was ~~based~~no change onin ~~evaluations~~the methodology of determining the ~~collectability~~allowance offor ~~loans,~~loan islosses anat ~~amount~~June 30, ~~that management~~2011 ~~believes~~as ~~will~~compared to beDecember 31, ~~adequate~~2010 ~~over~~apart ~~time~~from changes to ~~absorb~~loss ~~possible~~factors ~~losses~~based on ~~unfunded~~management’s ~~commitments~~perception of ~~(off-balance~~economic ~~sheet~~environmental ~~financial~~factors ~~instruments)~~and trends. Management believes that ~~may~~the ~~become~~allowance ~~uncollectible~~for loan losses is adequate for each period presented. The activity in the ~~future~~allowance for loan losses is shown in the following table.

Asset Quality. In its lending activities, the Company seeks to develop sound loans with customers who will grow with the Company. There has not been an effort to rapidly build the portfolio and earnings at the sacrifice of asset quality. At the same time, the extension of credit inevitably carries some risk of non-payment.


	Six Months
	Ended			Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)	June 30, 2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	3,174		$	2,380		$	1,860		$	1,665		$	1,614
Charge-offs — Commercial and Industrial loans		(407	)		(1,140	)		(500	)		(179	)		(72	)
Charge-offs — SBA loans		(143	)		(447	)		(463	)		(318	)		—
Real estate loans:
Charge-offs — Owner occupied		(535	)		—			(138	)		—			—
Charge-offs — Non owner occupied		(96	)		(386	)		—			—			—
Recoveries — Commercial and Industrial loans		48			26			—			45			78
Recoveries — SBA loans		22			25			5			—			—

Net recoveries (charge-offs)		(1,111	)		(1,922	)		(1,096	)		(452	)		6

Provision for loan losses		1,308			2,716			1,616			647			45

Ending balance	$	3,371		$	3,174		$	2,380		$	1,860		$	1,665


Net recoveries (charge-offs) to average loans		(0.60	%)		(1.04	%)		(0.65	%)		(0.33	%)		0.00	%

Below is a summary of the Company’s impaired loans at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

									For Period:
									Average
					Related Allowance for				Recorded		Interest Income
	Recorded Investment				Losses				Investment		Recognized
	March 31,		December 31,		March 31,		December 31,		March 31,		March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2011		2010
Non-accrual loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans:
With specific reserves	$	1,186	$	963	$	791	$	445	$	985	$	—	$	25
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—				—		—
		1,186		963		791		445		985		—		25
SBA loans:
With specific reserves		248		359		119		194		325		—		8
Without specific reserves		27		29		—		—		29		—		—
		275		388		119		194		354		—		8
Real Estate — Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves		3,202		3,140		646		483		3,179		—		64
Without specific reserves		545		816		—		—		613		—		17
		3,747		3,956		646		483		3,792		—		81

									For Period:
									Average
					Related Allowance for				Recorded		Interest Income
	Recorded Investment				Losses				Investment		Recognized
	March 31,		December 31,		March 31,		December 31,		March 31,		March 31,		December 31,
Continued	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2011		2010
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves		1,935		1,976		426		399		1,966		—		41
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		1,935		1,976		426		399		1,966		—		41
Total Non-accrual loans
With specific reserves	$	6,571	$	6,438	$	1,982	$	1,521	$	6,455	$	—	$	138
Without specific reserves		572		845		—		—		642		—		17
Total Non-accrual loans	$	7,143	$	7,283	$	1,982	$	1,521	$	7,097	$	—	$	155
TDR** loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans:
With specific reserves	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Without specific reserves		45		154		—		—		150		1		13
	$	45	$	154		—		—		150		1		13
Number of loans		1		1
Real Estate — Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves		2,051		2,051		13		13		2,051		60		125
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
		2,051		2,051		13		13		2,051		60		125
Number of loans		1		1
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves		1,599		1,603		11		11		1,600		16		82
Without specific reserves		174		177		—		—		177		3		12
		1,773		1,780		11		11		1,777		19		94
Number of loans		7		7
Total Loans:
With specific reserves	$	3,650	$	3,654	$	25	$	25	$	3,651	$	76		207
Without specific reserves		219		331		—		—		327		4		25
Total TDR loans	$	3,869	$	3,985	$	25	$	25	$	3,978	$	80	$	232
Number of loans		9		9
Other Impaired loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans:
With specific reserves	$	—	$	250	$	—	$	125		125	$	—	$	19
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total Other Impaired loans	$	—	$	250	$	—	$	125		125	$	—	$	19
Total Impaired Loans:
With specific reserves	$	10,221	$	10,342	$	1,005	$	1,671		10,231	$	76	$	364
Without specific reserves		791		1,176		—		—		969		4		42
Total Impaired loans	$	11,012	$	11,518	$	1,005	$	1,671		11,200	$	80	$	406

During 2011, loans to twelve borrowers and related entities totaling $1.2 million were determined to be uncollectible and were charged-off.

**The ~~Troubled~~activity ~~Debt~~in ~~Restructured~~the allowance for loan losses by category during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is shown in the following table.


							Real Estate Loans
	Commercial									Non-
	and			SBA			Owner			Owner
In thousands	Industrial			Loans			Occupied			Occupied			Unallocated		Total

Balance at December 31, 2010	$	1,023		$	627		$	682		$	715		$	127	$	3,174
Less loan charge offs		(407	)		(143	)		(535	)		(96	)				(1,181	)
Loss recoveries		48			22			—			—					70
Provision for loan losses		771			111			230			182			14		1,308

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	1,435		$	617		$	377		$	801		$	141	$	3,371


Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	886		$	225		$	237		$	473				$	1,821

Amount of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,704		$	319		$	8,171		$	6,462				$	16,656

The activity in the allowance for loan losses by category during the six months ended June 30, 2010 is shown in the following table.


					Real Estate Loans
	Commercial						Non-
	and		SBA		Owner		Owner
In thousands	Industrial		Loans		Occupied		Occupied		Unallocated		Total

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	1,290	$	576	$	168	$	242	$	104	$	2,380
Loan charge offs		930		407		—		106		—		1,443
Loss recoveries		22		7		—		—		—		29
Provision for loan losses		295		192		275		214		58		1,034

Balance at June 30, 2010	$	677	$	368	$	443	$	350	$	162	$	2,000


Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	251	$	23	$	—	$	14	$	—	$	288

Amount of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,851	$	256	$	3,094	$	7,994	$	—	$	14,195

Additionally, the Company has established a reserve for unfunded commitments that is recorded by a provision charged to other expenses. At June 30, 2011 the balance of this reserve was $60 thousand. The reserve, based on evaluations of the collectability of loans, is an amount that management believes will be adequate over time to absorb possible losses on unfunded commitments (off-balance sheet financial instruments) that may become uncollectible in the future.

Asset Quality. In its lending activities, the Company seeks to develop sound loans with customers who will grow with the Company. The Company has not, and does not intend to, rapidly build the portfolio and earnings at the sacrifice of asset quality. At the same time, the extension of credit inevitably carries some risk of non-payment.

~~Non-accrual~~Below ~~loan~~is ~~activity~~a issummary ~~summarized~~of asthe ~~follows~~recorded investment amount and related allowance for losses of the Company’s impaired loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	Three Months
					Related Allowance for
	Ended		Year Ended December 31,
	Recorded Investment				Losses
In thousands	March 31, 2011		2010		2009		2008		2007
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	7,283	$	2,734	$	5,819	$	1,125	$	628
	2011		2010		2011		2010
New loans placed on non-accrual		753		7,846		2,427		5,046		569
LOANS WITH SPECIFIC RESERVES:
Less:
Non-accrual loans:
Loan restored to interest earning status		—		—		1,266		—		—
Commercial and Industrial loans	$	1,515	$	963	$	830	$	445
Paid-off: sold in foreclosure		—		—		576		—		—
SBA loans		277		359		225		194
Other real estate owned additions		—		945		2,462		—		—
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		2,021		3,140		237		483
Charge offs		275		1,973		1,101		236		72
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied		2,350		1,976		430		399
Other including payments received		618		379		107		116		—
Total Non-accrual loans		6,163		6,438		1,722		1,521
Balance at the end of the period	$	7,143	$	7,283	$	2,734	$	5,819	$	1,125
TDR** loans:
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		—		2,051		—		13
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied		1,753		1,603		43		11
Total TDR loans		1,753		3,654		43		24
Number of loans		7		7
Other Impaired loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans		84		250		56		125
Total Other Impaired loans		84		250		56		125
LOANS WITHOUT SPECIFIC RESERVES:
Non-accrual loans:
SBA loans		—		29		—		—
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		544		816		—		—
Total Non-accrual loans		544		845		—		—
TDR** loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans		45		154		—		—
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		1,494		—		—		—
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied		—		177		—		—
Total TDR loans		1,539		331		—		—
Number of loans		2		2
Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans	$	1,644	$	1,367	$	886	$	570
SBA loans		277		388		225		194
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		4,059		6,007		237		496
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied		4,103		3,756		473		410
Total Impaired loans		10,083	$	11,518	$	1,821	$	1,670
**Troubled Debt Restructured

Non-accrual loan activity by category during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	7,283	$	963	$	388	$	3,956	$	1,976
New loans placed on non-accrual		753		404		70		279		—
Less:
Charge offs		275		85		143		47		—
Other including payments received		618		96		40		441		41
Balance at the end of the period	$	7,143	$	1,186	$	275	$	3,747	$	1,935

Non-accrual loan activity by category during the three month period ended March 31, 2010 is summarized as follows:

			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	2,734	$	2,280	$	454	$	—	$	—
New loans placed on non-accrual		403		—		403		—		—
Less:
Charge offs		475		—		475		—		—
Other including payments received		126		—		126		—		—
Balance at the end of the period	$	2,536	$	2,280	$	256	$	—	$	—

Non-accrual loans with specific reserves at March 31, 2011 are comprised of:

Commercial loans — eight loans to seven borrowers totaling $1.2 million with $0.8 million of specific reserves established.

SBA loans — four loans to three borrowers totaling $248 thousand with $119 thousand of specific reserves established.

Owner-occupied Real Estate loans — five loans to six borrowers secured by commercial property in the amount of $3.2 million with specific reserves established for these loans in the amount of $646 thousand.

Non-owner Occupied Real Estate loans — five loans to four borrowers, secured by the residential and commercial property in the amount of $1.9 million, after a partial charge-off of $106 thousand and with specific reserves of $426 thousand established for the loans. The borrowers of four of the above loans are controlled by the same individual.

All of these loans are in various stages of collection.

AtBelow ~~March 31,~~is ~~2011,~~a ~~the~~summary ~~Company~~of ~~has~~the ~~modified~~average ~~nine~~recorded ~~loans~~investment inamount ~~amounts~~and ~~totaling~~recognized ~~$3.9 million~~interest ~~which~~income ~~modifications~~related ~~qualify~~to the ~~loans~~Company’s ~~as Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR). These loans are included in the schedule above of accruing~~ impaired loans. ~~These~~during ~~borrowers are in compliance with~~ the ~~modified terms~~six ~~and~~month ~~are accruing interest. Changes made to the loans included the reduction of loan payments from principal~~ and ~~interest~~three ~~payments~~month ~~to interest only payments for specific time~~ periods, ~~the decrease~~ended inat ~~interest rates charged on a loan and the extension of the maturity of a loan. Specific~~June ~~reserves~~30, ~~were established on the loans as appropriate. The majority of these loans were modified in~~2011: ~~the third quarter of 2010 as the adverse economic conditions hampered borrowers’ current cash flows.~~

TDRs included in non-accruing loans are summarized below. Generally the borrowers have not shown sustained compliance with the modified loan terms.


	Average Recorded Amount				Income Recorded
	For Periods Ended				For Periods Ended
	June 30, 2011				June 30, 2011
	Six Months		Three months		Six Months		Three Months
LOANS WITH SPECIFIC RESERVES:
Non-accrual loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans	$	1,118	$	1,218	$	6	$	—
SBA loans		297		276		—		—
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		3,017		2,896		—		—
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied		2,010		2,043		—		—

Total Non-accrual loans		6,442		6,433		6		—


TDR loans:**
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		1,465		684		52		21
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied		1,773		1,766		35		17

Total TDR loans		3,238		2,450		87		38


Other Impaired loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans		149		104		3		1

Total Other Impaired loans		149		104		3		1


LOANS WITHOUT SPECIFIC RESERVES:
Non-accrual loans:
SBA loans		24		21		—		—
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		583		562		—		—

Total Non-accrual loans		607		583		—		—


TDR loans:**
Commercial and Industrial loans		105		45		2		1
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		1,892		1,680		53		26

Total TDR loans		1,997		1,725		55		27


Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans	$	1,372	$	1,367	$	11	$	2
SBA loans		321		297		—		—
Real Estate — Owner Occupied		6,957		5,822		105		47
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied		3,783		3,809		35		17

Total Impaired loans	$	12,433	$	11,295	$	151	$	66

	Recorded		Specific		Recorded		Specific
	Amount		Reserve		Amount		Reserve
	March 31,		March 31,		December 31,		December 31,
In thousands	2011		2011		2010		2010
TDR on Non-accrual loans:
Commercial and Industrial loans:
With specific reserves	$	151	$	31	$	—	$	—
Without specific reserves								—
		151		31		—		—
Number of loans		1
SBA loans:
With specific reserves		—		—		50		50
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—
		—		—		50		50
Number of loans						1
Real Estate — Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves		3,140		600		3,140		483
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—
		3,140		600		3,140		483
Number of loans		4				4
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied:
With specific reserves*		807		244		819		223
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—
		807		244		819		223
Number of loans		2				2
Total TDR Non-accrual Loans:
With specific reserves	$	4,098	$	875	$	4,009	$	756
Without specific reserves		—		—		—		—
Total TDR Non-accrual loans	$	4,098	$	875	$	4,009	$	756
Number of loans		7				7

At March 31, 2011, there were $4.4 million of performing loans considered potential problem loans, defined as loans which are not included in the 90 day past due, not reported as troubled debt restructures or as nonaccrual loans, but for which known information about possible credit problems causes the Company to be uncertain as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms which may in the future result in disclosure in the past due, nonaccrual or restructured loans. The Company closely monitors the financial status of these borrowers.

Generally, the accrual of interest is discontinued when a loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when principal or interest is delinquent for ninety days or more. Interest may accrue on TDRs if the borrowers are consistently in compliance with the modified loan terms. During 2011, there were no amounts included in gross interest income attributable to loans in non-accrual status.

~~The following table shows the amounts of non~~Non-~~performing~~accrual ~~assets~~loan onactivity ~~the~~is ~~dates~~summarized ~~indicated~~as follows:

	March 31,			December 31:
	Six Months
In thousands	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
	Ended			Year Ended December 31,
Nonaccrual loans:
In thousands	June 30, 2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,187		$	963		$	2,280		$	1,676		$	868
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	7,283		$	2,734		$	5,819		$	1,125		$	628
SBA		275			388			454			542			257
New loans placed on non-accrual		1,977			7,846			2,427			5,046			569
Real estate — owner occupied		3,746			3,956			—			3,601			—
Less:
Real estate — non owner occupied		1,935			1,976			—			—			—
Loan restored to interest earning status		—			—			1,266			—			—
Accrual loans —past due 90 days and over		—			—			—			—			—
Other real estate owned additions		720			945			2,462			—			—
Total non-performing loans		7,143			7,283			2,734			5,819			1,125
Charge offs		1,181			1,973			1,101			236			72
Other real estate owned		2,799			3,324			2,462			—			—
Other including payments received		652			379			683			116			—
Total non-performing assets	$	9,942		$	10,607		$	5,196		$	5,819		$	1,125
Balance at the end of the period	$	6,707		$	7,283		$	2,734		$	5,819		$	1,125
Accruing Troubled Debt Restructured loans	$	3,869		$	3,985		$	1,263			—			—
Allowance for loan losses to total non-performing loans		50.2	%		43.6	%		87.1	%		32.0	%		148.0	%
Non-performing loans to total loans		3.81	%		3.94	%		1.47	%		3.80	%		0.89	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		4.81	%		5.22	%		2.59	%		3.49	%		0.76	%

~~The~~Non-accrual ~~payment~~loan ~~status~~activity ofby ~~loans~~category ~~receivable~~during atthe ~~March~~six month period ended June 3130, 2011 is summarized as follows:

			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Current accruing loans	$	178,752	$	44,765	$	6,722	$	81,142	$	46,123
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	7,283	$	963	$	388	$	3,956	$	1,976
Current non-accruing loans		1,415		167		—		1,248		—
New loans placed on non-accrual		1,977		1,063		111		279		524
Past due loans:
Less:
30 to 89 days past due		1,877		—		74		412		1,391
Charge offs		1,181		407		143		535		96
90 days plus past due and accruing		—		—		—		—		—
Other including payments received		1,372		105		79		1,134		54
Non-accrual loans, non current		5,728		1,020		275		2,498		1,935
Balance at the end of the period	$	6,707	$	1,514	$	277	$	2,566	$	2,350
Total past due loans		7,605		1,020		349		2,910		3,326
Total loans at the end of the period	$	187,772	$	45,952	$	7,071	$	85,300	$	49,449

~~The~~Non-accrual ~~Company~~loan ~~applies~~activity ~~risk~~by ~~ratings~~category toduring the ~~loans~~six ~~based~~month ~~upon~~period ~~rating~~ended ~~criteria consistent with regulatory definitions. The risk ratings are adjusted~~June 30, as2010 ~~necessary, if loans become delinquent, if significant adverse information~~ is ~~discovered regarding the underlying credit and the normal~~ ~~periodic~~summarized ~~reviews~~as ~~of the underlying credits indicate that a change in risk rating is appropriate. A summary of the risk rating of loans receivable at March 31, 2011~~ follows:

			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Risk rated — pass	$	174,103	$	44,507	$	6,752	$	76,629	$	46,215
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	2,734	$	2,280	$	454	$	—	$	—
Risk rated — special mention (loan weaknesses noted which could lead to loan loss)		4,236		323		44		2,570		1,299
New loans placed on non-accrual		1,650		215		271		—		1,164
Risk rated- substandard or doubtful (loans with significant weaknesses that could, or has, result in loan losses)		9,433		1,122		275		6,101		1,935
Less:
Total loans at the end of the period	$	187,772	$	45,952	$	7,071	$	85,300	$	49,449
Charge offs		1,443		930		407		—		106
Other including payments received		208		53		155		—		—
Balance at the end of the period	$	2,733	$	1,512	$	163	$	—	$	1,058

Non-accrual loans with specific reserves at June 30, 2011 are comprised of:

Commercial loans — ten loans to nine borrowers totaling $1.5 million with $830 thousand of specific reserves established.

SBA loans — seven loans to six borrowers totaling $277 thousand with $225 thousand of specific reserves established.

Owner-occupied Real Estate loans — three loans secured by commercial property in the amount of $2.6 million with specific reserves established for these loans in the amount of $237 thousand.

Non-owner Occupied Real Estate loans- six loans to five borrowers, secured by the residential and commercial property in the amount of $2.3 million, after partial charge-off of $200 thousand and with specific reserves of $430 thousand established for the loans. The borrowers on four of the above loans are controlled by the same individual.

~~Real~~All ~~estate acquired through or in the process~~ of foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated disposal costs. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of the real estate acquired through foreclosure using current estimates of fair value when it has reason to believe that real estate values have declined for the particular type and location of the real estate owned. In the event of a subsequent decline, an allowance would be provided to reduce real estate acquired through foreclosure to fair value less estimated disposal cost. The Company acquired through foreclosure a commercial building with a fair value of approximately $653 thousand in March 2009. Because of the decline in real estate values in this building’s area, the Company has reduced the carrying value of this owned building by $153 thousand during 2010 and $75 thousand in 2011 offsetting these ~~reductions~~loans asare ~~increases~~ in ~~non-interest~~various ~~expenses.~~stages ~~The Company acquired another commercial building by foreclosure in November 2009 with a fair value~~ of ~~approximately $1~~collection.8 million. The Company also acquired through foreclosure five residential properties, comprised of four condominium units and one single family residence, during the fourth quarter of 2010. The house and one of the condominiums were sold in 2011. The fair value of these properties, and the recorded amount of the other real estate owned was $555 thousand at March 31, 2011. The Company is leasing the commercial properties and several of the residential condominiums to others under short term leases as it offers them for sale. Net income from the operations of the properties was $16 thousand during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and $4 thousand during the first three months of 2010. There was no financing of OREO sales during 2011 or 2010.

~~Investment Portfolio.~~ At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, ~~December 31,~~the ~~2010~~Company ~~and~~has ~~March 31,~~modified ~~2010,~~nine ~~the~~loans ~~Company~~in ~~had~~amounts nototaling $3.3 million which ~~investments~~modifications inqualify ~~securities~~the ~~other~~loans ~~than~~as ~~investments~~Troubled inDebt ~~Federal~~Restructuring ~~Reserve~~(TDR). ~~Bank~~These ~~stock~~loans asare ~~required~~included byin ~~regulation~~the ~~and~~schedule ~~stock~~above inof ~~two~~accruing ~~banker’s~~impaired ~~banks~~loans. ~~The~~These ~~Company~~borrowers isare ~~maintaining~~in ~~its~~compliance ~~liquid~~with ~~assets~~the ~~in its~~modified ~~account~~terms atand ~~the~~are ~~Federal~~accruing ~~Reserve~~interest. ~~and~~Changes ~~fully~~made ~~FDIC~~to ~~insured~~the ~~certificates~~loans ofincluded ~~deposits~~the inreduction ~~other~~of ~~financial~~loan payments ~~institutions~~from ~~for~~principal ~~safety~~ and ~~liquidity~~interest ~~purposes.~~payments ~~The~~to ~~Company~~interest ~~will~~only ~~make~~payments ~~additional~~for ~~investments~~specific ~~when~~time periods, the decrease in interest rates ~~have~~charged ~~increased~~on a loan and the ~~Company~~extension ~~has~~of ~~sufficient~~the ~~excess~~maturity ~~liquidity.~~of ~~The~~a ~~following~~loan. ~~table~~Specific ~~provides~~reserves ~~information~~were ~~regarding~~established on the ~~composition~~loans as appropriate. The majority of these loans were modified in the ~~Company’s~~third ~~investment~~quarter ~~securities~~of ~~portfolio~~2010 at as the ~~dates~~adverse ~~indicated~~economic conditions hampered borrowers’ current cash flows.

	Investment in Stocks
	March 31, 2011					December 31, 2010
In thousands	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Investments in stocks, at cost;
Federal Reserve Stock	$	465		88.24	%	$	465		88.24	%
Corporate equities		62		11.76	%		62		11.76	%
Total stocks	$	527		100.00	%	$	527		100.00	%

TDRs included in non-accruing loans are summarized below. Generally the borrowers have not shown sustained compliance with the modified loan terms.

These stock holdings are recorded at cost as they are not readily marketable.


	Recorded Investment				Related Allowance for Losses
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
In thousands	2011		2010		2011		2010
TDRs with specific reserves:
Commercial and Industrial loans	$	151	$	—	$	121	$	—
SBA loans		—		50		—		40
Real Estate — Owner Occupied:		2,021		3,140		237		483
Real Estate — Non Owner Occupied:		794		819		244		223

Total non-accruing loans	$	2,966	$	4,009	$	602	$	746

Number of loans		5		7

~~Deposits~~Accruing ~~and~~TDR ~~Liquidity.~~loan ~~The~~activity ~~Company currently has no business other than that of the Bank and does not currently have any material funding commitments unrelated to that business. The Bank’s principal sources of funds~~ for loans, investments and general operations are deposits from its primary market area, principal and interest payments on loans, and proceeds from maturing investment securities. Its principal funding commitments are for the ~~origination~~three ~~or purchase of loans~~ and ~~the~~six ~~payment~~months ofended ~~maturing deposits~~June 30, ~~and~~2011 ~~the~~is ~~payment~~shown ~~for~~in ~~checks drawn upon it. The Bank’s most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, which are cash on hand, amounts due from other financial institutions including~~ the ~~Federal Reserve and Federal funds sold. The levels of such~~ ~~assets~~following ~~are dependent on the Bank’s lending, investment and operating activities at any given time~~table. ~~The variations in levels of liquid assets are influenced by deposit flows and loan demand, both current and anticipated.~~

The Company’s deposits consist of demand deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. These accounts provide the Company with a relatively stable source of funds. The Company generally targets larger deposit relationships by offering competitive interest rates on certificates of deposit of $75 thousand or more in our local markets. Deposits from the local market areas are supplemented with out-of-area deposits comprised of funds obtained through the use of deposit listing services (national market certificates of deposit), deposits obtained through the use of brokers and through the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program. As a result, a substantial portion of our deposits, 23.1% at March 31, 2011 and 24.5% at December 31, 2010 and 34.2% at March 31, 2010, are comprised of certificate of deposit accounts of $100 thousand or more. Total certificates of deposit represent 68.2% of deposits at March 31, 2011 and 68.5% of deposits at December 31, 2010 and 75.9% at March 31, 2010.


						Real Estate Loans
	Commercial								Non-
	and			SBA		Owner			Owner
In thousands	Industrial			Loans		Occupied			Occupied			Total
Three Months
TDR loans at March 31, 2011	$	45		$	—	$	2,051		$	1,773		$	3,869
New TDR loans		—			—		1,494			—			1,494
Principal payments received		—			—		(2,051	)		(20	)		(2,071	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	45		$	—	$	1,494		$	1,753		$	3,292


Six Months
TDR loans at December 31, 2010	$	154		$	—	$	2,051		$	1,780		$	3,985
New TDR loans		45			—		1,494			—			1,539
Principal payments received		—			—		(2,051	)		(27	)		(2,078	)
Loans moved to non-accrual*		(154	)		—		—			—			(154	)

Balance at June 30, 2011	$	45		$	—	$	1,494		$	1,753		$	3,292


*		Accrued income reversed upon move to non-accrual

At June 30, 2011, there were $2.7 million of performing loans considered potential problem loans, defined as loans which are not included in the 90 day past due, not reported as troubled debt restructures or as nonaccrual loans, but for which known information about possible credit problems causes the Company to be uncertain as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms which may in the future result in disclosure in the past due, nonaccrual or restructured loans. The Company closely monitors the financial status of these borrowers.

The following table shows the amounts of non-performing assets on the dates indicated:


	June 30,			December 31:
In thousands	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial and Industrial	$	1,514		$	963		$	2,280		$	1,676		$	868
SBA		277			388			454			542			257
Real estate — owner occupied		2,566			3,956			—			3,601			—
Real estate — non owner occupied		2,350			1,976			—			—			—
Accrual loans —past due 90 days and over		—			—			—			—			—

Total non-performing loans		6,707			7,283			2,734			5,819			1,125

Other real estate owned		3,332			3,324			2,462			—			—

Total non-performing assets	$	10,039		$	10,607		$	5,196		$	5,819		$	1,125


Accruing Troubled Debt Restructured loans	$	3,292		$	3,985		$	1,263			—			—
Allowance for loan losses to total non-performing loans		33.6	%		43.6	%		87.1	%		32.0	%		148.0	%
Non-performing loans to total loans		3.71	%		3.94	%		1.47	%		3.80	%		0.89	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		4.77	%		5.22	%		2.59	%		3.49	%		0.76	%

The payment status of loans receivable at June 30, 2011 is as follows:


			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Current accruing loans	$	171,308	$	42,465	$	7,263	$	75,771	$	45,809
Current non-accruing loans		165		165		—		—		—
Past due loans:
30 to 89 days past due		2,705		467		202		2,036		—
90 days plus past due and accruing		—		—		—		—		—
Non-accrual loans, non current		6,542		1,349		277		2,566		2,350

Total past due loans		9,247		1,816		479		4,602		2,350

Total loans at the end of the period	$	180,720	$	44,446	$	7,742	$	80,373	$	48,159


Above amounts exclude deferred fees

The Company applies risk ratings to the loans based upon rating criteria consistent with regulatory definitions. The risk ratings are adjusted, as necessary, if loans become delinquent, if significant adverse information is discovered regarding the underlying credit and the normal periodic reviews of the underlying credits indicate that a change in risk rating is appropriate. A summary of the risk rating of loans receivable at June 30, 2011 follows:


			Commercial				Real Estate		Real Estate
			and				Owner		Non Owner
In thousands	Total		Industrial		SBA		Occupied		Occupied
Risk rated — pass	$	167,359	$	42,789	$	7,424	$	73,697	$	43,449
Risk rated — special mention (loan weaknesses noted which could lead to loan loss)		4,112		59		41		1,652		2,360
Risk rated- substandard or doubtful (loans with significant weaknesses that could, or has, result in loan losses)		9,249		1,598		277		5,024		2,350

Total loans	$	180,720	$	44,446	$	7,742	$	80,373	$	48,159

Above amounts exclude deferred fees

Real estate acquired through or in the process of foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated disposal costs. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of the real estate acquired through foreclosure using current estimates of fair value when it has reason to believe that real estate values have declined for the particular type and location of the real estate owned. In the event of a subsequent decline, an allowance would be provided to reduce real estate acquired through foreclosure to fair value less estimated disposal cost. The Company acquired through foreclosure a commercial building with a fair value of approximately $653 thousand in March 2009. Because of the decline in real estate values in this building’s area, the Company has reduced the carrying value of this owned building by $153 thousand during 2010 and $125 thousand in 2011 offsetting these reductions as increases in non-interest expenses. The Company acquired another commercial building by foreclosure in November 2009 with a fair value of approximately $1.8 million. The Company also acquired through foreclosure five residential properties, comprised of four condominium units and one single family residence, during the fourth quarter of 2010. The house and two of the condominiums were sold in 2011. The fair value of these properties, and the recorded amount of the other real estate owned was $392 thousand at June 30, 2011. In 2011 the Company acquired another commercial building through foreclosure with a fair value of $720 thousand. The Company is leasing two of the commercial properties to others under short term leases as it offers them for sale. Net income from the operations of the properties was $28 thousand during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $4 thousand during the first six months of 2010. The Company capitalized $86 thousand of costs to update and improve two of the residential properties, one of which has been sold. The Company did not finance any of the property sales.

Investment Portfolio. At June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the Company had no investments in securities other than investments in Federal Reserve Bank stock as required by regulation and stock in two banker’s banks. The Company is maintaining its liquid assets in its account at the Federal Reserve and fully FDIC insured certificates of deposits in other financial institutions for safety and liquidity purposes. The Company will make additional investments when interest rates have increased and the Company has sufficient excess liquidity. The following table provides information regarding the composition of the Company’s investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated.


	Investment in Stocks
	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
In thousands	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Investments in stocks, at cost;
Federal Reserve Stock	$	465		88.24	%	$	465		88.24	%
Corporate equities		62		11.76	%		62		11.76	%

Total stocks	$	527		100.00	%	$	527		100.00	%

These stock holdings are recorded at cost as they are not readily marketable.

Deposits and Liquidity. The Company currently has no business other than that of the Bank and does not currently have any material funding commitments unrelated to that business. The Bank’s principal sources of funds for loans, investments and general operations are deposits from its primary market area, principal and interest payments on loans, and proceeds from maturing investment securities. Its principal funding commitments are for the origination or purchase of loans and the payment of maturing deposits, and the payment for checks drawn upon it. The Bank’s most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, which are cash on hand, amounts due from other financial institutions including the Federal Reserve. The levels of such assets are dependent on the Bank’s lending, investment and operating activities at any given time. The variations in levels of liquid assets are influenced by deposit flows and loan demand, both current and anticipated.

The Company’s deposits consist of demand deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. These accounts provide the Company with a relatively stable source of funds. The Company generally targets larger deposit relationships by offering competitive interest rates on certificates of deposit of $75 thousand or more in our local markets. Deposits from the local market areas are supplemented with out-of-area deposits comprised of funds obtained through the use of deposit listing services (national market certificates of deposit), deposits obtained through the use of brokers and through the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program. As a result, a substantial portion of our deposits, 20.3% at June 30, 2011 and 24.5% at December 31, 2010 and 32.9% at June 30, 2010, are comprised of certificate of deposit accounts of $100 thousand or more. Total certificates of deposit represent 67.2% of deposits at June 30, 2011 and 68.5% of deposits at December 31, 2010 and 74.4% at June 30, 2010.

The Company’s reliance on certificates of deposit, including the use of larger denomination certificates of deposit and brokered deposits, facilitates funding the growth in the loan portfolio. The Company has relied on certificates of deposit as a primary funding source and has used larger certificates of deposits as a funding source since its inception. While sometimes requiring higher interest rates, such funds carry lower acquisition costs (marketing, overhead costs) and can be obtained when required at the maturity dates desired. Substantially all of the deposit accounts over $100 thousand are fully insured by the FDIC through differing ownership and trustee arrangements and the insured deposit limit of $250 thousand. All of the brokered deposits and national market deposits are fully insured by the FDIC. This insurance and the strong capital position of the Company reduce the likelihood of large deposit withdrawals for reasons other than interest rate competition. Interest rates on these deposits can be, but are not always, higher than other deposits products. There is, however, a risk that some deposits would be lost if rates were to increase and the Company elected not to remain competitive with its own deposit rates. Under those conditions, the Company believes that it is positioned to use other sources of funds, such as borrowing on its unsecured credit facilities with other banks or the sale of loans.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, deposits totaled $~~182~~186.76 million as compared to $180.1 million at December 31, 2010. The $2.6.5 million increase in deposits resulted from the $12.7 million increase in noninterest bearing deposits, the $02.81 million increase in savings accounts balance, the increase of $12.31 million in the amount of certificates of deposit and the decrease of $10.34 million in interest bearing demand deposits and money market accounts. There were $3436.16 million and $33.1 million of brokered certificates of deposit at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Included in these brokered deposits at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 are $87.26 million of certificates of deposits received in exchange for the placement of the Company’s customers’ deposit funds with other financial institutions under the CDARS program. Included in deposits are deposits of officers and directors (and their affiliated entities) of $1211.4 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

As a result of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, banks are no longer prohibited from paying interest on demand deposit accounts, including those from businesses, effective in July 2011. If the Company starts to pay interest on these accounts, its net interest margin would decline. It is not clear what affect the elimination of this prohibition will have on the Bank’s interest expense, allocation of deposits, deposit pricing, loan pricing, net interest margin, ability to compete, ability to establish and maintain customer relationships, or profitability.

Deposits are summarized below as of dates indicated:

	March 31,		%			December 31:
	June 30,		%			December 31:
	2011		Change			2010		2009		2008
In thousands	2011		Change			2010		2009		2008
In thousands
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	26,474		11.4	%	$	23,760	$	21,024	$	23,599
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	25,442		7.1	%	$	23,760	$	21,024	$	23,599
Interest bearing deposits:
NOW accounts		~~251~~885		(8030.48	%)		1,279	$	309	$	1,247
Money Market accounts		8,~~618~~828		(20.30	%)		8,824		7,841		13,049
Savings accounts		2325,~~796~~104		39.63	%		22,962		10,379		148
Certificates of deposit accounts:
Less than $100,000		8287,~~437~~462		410.14	%		79,209		71,593		37,539
$100,000 or more		4237,~~125~~885		(414.41	%)		44,076		67,499		69,659
Total interest bearing deposits		~~157~~160,~~227~~164		02.64	%		156,350		157,621		121,642
Total deposits	$	~~182~~186,~~669~~638		13.46	%	$	180,110	$	178,645	$	145,241

2527

The table below shows the maturities of certificates of deposit:

	March 31, 2011				December 31, 2010
	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
					CDs of
	CDs of $100,000				CDs of $100,000
	CDs of $100,000				$100,000 or
In thousands	or more		All CDs		or more		All CDs
	or more		All CDs		more		All CDs
Three months or less	$	6,894	$	18,811	$	9,228	$	21,682
In thousands
Over three months to six months		6,766		21,757		15,492		28,124
Three months or less	$	15,520	$	28,518	$	9,228	$	21,682
Over six months to twelve months		9,136		32,428		7,486		29,325
Over three months to six months		7,226		17,788		15,492		28,124
Over twelve months through three years		12,964		43,368		9,058		36,497
Over six months to twelve months		1,946		15,744		7,486		29,325
Over three years		2,125		8,983		2,812		7,657
Over twelve months through three years		14,973		57,107		9,058		36,497
Total	$	37,885	$	125,347	$	44,076	$	123,285
Over three years		2,460		5,405		2,812		7,657
Total	$	42,125	$	124,562	$	44,076	$	123,285

The table below shows the source of the Company’s certificate of deposits as well as the amount equal to or greater than $100,000 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011:

CDs with

CDs with balances

balances of less

of $100,000 or

In thousands

than $100,000

greater

Total

Source

Local markets

65,~~472~~888

2624,~~574~~540

3330,~~046~~428

National market

5658,~~937~~277

~~448~~—

5758,~~385~~277

CDARS program:

Customers’ funds

~~571~~—

7,~~545~~554

87,~~116~~554

Proprietary funding

34,~~704~~268

65,~~355~~791

10,059

Other brokered funds

1419,~~753~~029

~~1,203~~—

1519,~~956~~029

Total

8287,~~437~~462

4237,~~125~~885

~~124~~125,~~562~~347

CDARS program funding is reflected in the above schedule as “Customers’ funds” and “Proprietary funding”. The Company, acting as agent for its customers, places customer funds in other financial institutions under the program up to the FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. Under the CDARS program, other financial institutions place deposits in the Company for the same amount of the customers’ funds. “Customers’ funds” are comprised of deposits from these customer transactions. The Company can obtain funding under the CDARS program by bidding for deposit funds without customers’ involvement. This “Proprietary funding” results in traditional brokered deposits.

The Company’s short term liquid assets of cash and cash equivalents were $1525.48 million, or 712.52% of assets, and $13.7 million, or 6.8%, of assets at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Continued growth in deposits will be required to fund any loan growth. Accordingly, the Company intends to maintain a competitive posture in its deposit interest rate offerings. While ~~adequate~~ adequate liquidity is imperative, excess liquidity has the effect of a lower interest margin, as funds not invested in loans are placed in short-term investments that earn significantly lower yields.

The Company has available unsecured credit facilities for short-term liquidity needs from financial institutions of $8.5 million at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010. There were no borrowings outstanding under these credit arrangements at during 2011 or 2010.

The Company believes its levels of liquidity are adequate to conduct the business of the Company and Bank.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company holds collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. The Company has not been required to perform on any financial guarantees and has not recorded or incurred any losses on its commitments. The issuance of letters of credit is not a significant activity of the Company. Outstanding letters of credit at ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 and December 31, 2010 totaled $1.32 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

~~Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to customers as long as there are no~~28 violations of any condition established in the loan contracts. These commitments include commitments to lend funds as well as un-advanced loan funds. These commitments at March 31, 2011 totaled $34.1 million and $41.6 million at December 31, 2010. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to customers as long as there are no violations of any condition established in the loan contracts. These commitments include commitments to lend funds as well as un-advanced loan funds. These commitments at June 30, 2011 totaled $41.0 million and $41.6 million at December 31, 2010. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

With the exception of these off-balance sheet arrangements, the Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources, that is material to investors.

CAPITAL ADEQUACY

The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by bank holding companies and state non-member banks, respectively. The regulations impose two sets of capital adequacy requirements: minimum leverage rules, which require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a specified minimum ratio of capital to total assets, and risk-based capital rules, which require the maintenance of specified minimum ratios of capital to “risk-weighted” assets. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2011, the Company and the Bank were in full compliance with these guidelines, as follows:

							Minimum Ratios
	March 31,			December 31,			To be “Adequately			To be “Well
	June 30,			December 31,			To be “Adequately			To be “Well
	2011			2010			Capitalized”			Capitalized”
Total capital:
Company		13.18	%		13.1	%		8.0	%		N/A
Bank		1213.41	%		12.3	%		8.0	%		10.0	%
Tier I:
Company		1112.96	%		11.8	%		4.0	%		N/A
Bank		11.28	%		11.1	%		4.0	%		6.0	%
Leverage Total:
Company		11.2	%		11.0	%		4.0	%		N/A
Bank		10.5	%		10.3	%		4.0	%		5.0	%

The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset quality, liquidity, earnings performance, and changing competitive conditions and economic forces. The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed by management on an ongoing basis. Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will assure an adequate level of capital to support anticipated asset growth and to absorb potential losses. The ability of the Company to grow is dependent on the availability of capital with which to meet regulatory capital requirements, discussed below. To the extent the Company is successful it may need to acquire additional capital through the sale of additional common stock, other qualifying equity instruments, such as preferred stock (which the Company is not currently authorized to issue), or subordinated debt. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to the Company on a timely basis or on attractive terms.

Under guidance by the federal banking regulators, banks which have concentrations in construction, land development or commercial real estate loans (other than loans for majority owner occupied properties) would be expected to maintain higher levels of risk management and, potentially, higher levels of capital. It is possible that the Company may be required to maintain higher levels of capital than it would otherwise be expected to maintain as a result of its levels of construction, development and commercial real estate loans, which may require us to obtain additional capital.

Significant further growth of the Company may be limited because the current level of capital will not support rapid short term growth while maintaining regulatory capital expectations. Loan portfolio growth will need to be funded by increases in deposits as the Company has limited amounts of on-balance sheet assets deployable into loans. Growth will depend upon Company earnings and/or the raising of additional capital.

2729


ITEM 3		— QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable


ITEM 4 —		CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated, as of the last day of the period covered by this report, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Act of 1934) during the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1		— Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of its business, the Company is involved in litigation arising from banking, financial, and other activities it conducts. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, operating results or liquidity.


Item 1A		— Risk Factors

Not applicable


Item 2		— Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Sales of Unregistered Securities. None (b) Use of Proceeds. Not applicable. (c) Issuer Purchases of Securities. None

(b) Use of Proceeds.Not applicable.


Item 3.		— Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None


Item 4		— [Removed and Reserved]


Item 5		— Other Information

(a) Information Required to be Reported on Form 8-K. None

	(a)		Information Required to be Reported on Form 8-K. None

	(b)		Changes in Security Holder Nomination Procedures. None

~~(b) Changes in Security Holder Nomination Procedures. None~~30


Item 6 —		Exhibits

Exhibit No.			Description of Exhibits
	3	(a)	Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (1)
	3	(b)	Bylaws of the Company (1)
	10	(a)	Employment Agreement between Richard J. Morgan and the Company (2)
	10	(b)	Employment Agreement between Lamont Thomas and the Company (3)
	10	(c)	First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Lamont Thomas and the Company (4)
	10	(d)	Employment Agreement between Michael T. Storm and CommerceFirst Bank (5)
	10	(e)	Extension of Employment Agreement between Richard J. Morgan and the Company (6)
	11		Statement regarding Computation of Per Share Income — See Notes to Financial Statements.
	21		Subsidiaries of the Registrant -The sole subsidiary of the Registrant is CommerceFirst Bank, a Maryland chartered commercial bank.
	31	(a)	Certification of Richard J. Morgan, President and CEO
	31	(b)	Certification of Michael T. Storm, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	32	(a)	Certification of Richard J. Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer
	32	(b)	Certification of Michael T. Storm, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and (iv) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


(1)		Incorporated by reference to exhibit of the same number filed with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2, as amended, (File No. 333-91817)

(2)		Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s to Registration Statement on Form SB-2, as amended) (File No. 333-91817)

(3)		Incorporated by reference to exhibits 10(c) to the Company’s to Registration Statement on Form SB-2, as amended) (File No. 333-91817)

(4)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007.

(5)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007.

(6)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 30, 2009.

2931

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	COMMERCEFIRST BANCORP, INC.
Date: May 9, 2011	By:	/s/ Richard J. Morgan
Date: August 4, 2011	By:	/s/ Richard J. Morgan
		Richard J. Morgan, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 9, 2011	By:	/s/ Michael T. Storm
Date: August 4, 2011	By:	/s/ Michael T. Storm
		Michael T. Storm, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

3032

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · COMMERCEFIRST BANCORP INC