SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2002~~2003

o[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________ TO __________.

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
0-22582

TBA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

(Name of Issuer in its Charter)

DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		62-1535897 (I.R.S. employer identification no.)
DELAWARE		62-1535897
16501 VENTURA BOULEVARD ENCINO, CALIFORNIA (Address of principal executive offices)		91436 (Zip Code)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
16501 VENTURA BOULEVARD
ENCINO, CALIFORNIA		91436
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(818) 728-2600
(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PER SHARE

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x [X] NO o[ ].

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) YES o [ ] NO x[X].

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based on the closing sale price of such stock as reported on ~~June~~ March 2826, ~~2002~~2004 on the American Stock Exchange) was ~~approximately~~ approximately $122,~~716~~680,~~700~~900.

As of March 3126, ~~2003~~2004, 7,~~368~~375,~~100~~400 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
	ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
	ITEM 1. BUSINESS
	ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
	ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
	ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
	ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
	ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
	ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
PART II
	ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
	ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
	ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
	ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
	ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
	ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
	ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
	ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
	ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART III
	ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
	ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
	ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
	ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
AGGREGATED FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
	ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
	ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
	ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
	ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
	ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
	ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART IV
	ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
	ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATION
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHBIT 21
EXHIBIT 10.11
EXHIBIT 21
EXHIBIT 23
EXHIBIT 99.1
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 99.2
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this Form 10-K contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by such provisions. These statements include, but are not limited to: management beliefs regarding the future operations of the Company, any projections of revenues, earnings or cash flows and the plans and objectives of management for future growth or sale of the Company.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future political, economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives of the Company will be achieved.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

None.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

GENERAL

TBA Entertainment Corporation (“TBA” or the “Company”) is a strategic communications and entertainment company that creates comprehensive programs to reach and engage audiences worldwide. TBA provides a broad range of strategic communications and entertainment services through its four integrated business segments. TBA believes itthat ~~has~~its a strong presence in each of these very fragmented industries ~~and~~has iscreated ~~building~~ an industry-leading integrated services company. With a base of Fortune ~~1000~~1,000 companies, fairs, festivals and ~~recording~~ recording artists as clients, TBA links global business with popular culture, ~~enabling~~ enabling clients to maximize the impact of the message and the results achieved. TBA has ~~nine~~ offices spanning from Los Angeles to London including Nashville, Chicago, San Diego, Salt Lake City, Atlanta, ~~Omaha~~ and ~~Seattle~~Omaha. TBA’s four ~~business~~ business segments are as follows:

• Corporate Communications — Develops and produces strategic communications, entertainment and special event services to corporate clients worldwide. • Entertainment Marketing — Creates and executes innovative entertainment marketing initiatives including music tours, television broadcasts and special events. • ~~Fair~~Fairs and Festivals — Develops and produces a broad range of entertainment programs, national sponsorship initiatives and seasonal programming for fairs and festival clients. • Artist Management — Develops and implements career strategies and corporate partnerships for some of the most successful artists in the entertainment industry.

The integration of TBA’s four business divisions creates competitive advantages for the Company. TBA believes that while a variety of competitors exist with each of the Company’s divisions, none offers the complete scope of services provided by TBA. This intra-company synergy provides TBA’s clients with an expanded range of comprehensive services while creating additional sources of revenues and profits for the Company. For example, in producing corporate meetings and entertainment marketing programs, the Company creates opportunities to showcase artist management clients. Providing entertainment marketing programs for corporate clients conversely provides opportunities to cross-sell client decision makers on other corporate communication and entertainment events.

The Company was incorporated in Tennessee in June 1993 and reincorporated in Delaware in September 1997.

PROPOSED SALE OF THE COMPANY

On April 8, 2004, the Company signed definitive merger documents for the proposed sale of 100% of the capital stock of the Company in an all cash transaction. The proposed sale of the Company, which requires shareholder approval, is likely to close in the second quarter of 2004. The proposed terms of the transaction provide for cash consideration in the amount of $6,150,000 which, after deduction of certain transaction expenses, results in net consideration of $0.67 per share of common stock and $0.70 per share of preferred stock, subject to downward adjustment based on certain of the Company’s other expenses incurred in connection with the transaction. It is anticipated that the transaction will result in the Company no longer being a publicly traded entity.

CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS

The Corporate Communications division is an industry leader in the strategic development and production of innovative business communications, entertainment and special event programs that enable corporate clients to reach and engage targeted internal and business-to-business audiences worldwide. TBA utilizes award-winning creative capabilities and state-of-the-art technology to help corporate clients worldwide deliver targeted messages that educate, inspire and motivate. The Corporate Communications division ~~targets clients~~ ~~with recurring needs for business communications and entertainment services.~~ ~~The Company’s client list encompasses a number of industry sectors including~~ telecommunications, information technology, pharmaceuticals, food service and insurance. Representative clients include BellSouth, SAP, BEA Systems, Motorola, Sanofi, McDonald’s Corporation, and Mass Mutual. SAP accounted for 21% and 10% of total Company revenues in 2001 and 2000, respectively.

~~The Corporate Communications division specializes in the creative~~3 development, design, production and staging of a wide range of internal and business-to-business events including: sales conferences, business meetings and headline entertainment, product introductions and recognition events. TBA believes that it has benefited from the decision by an increasing number of major corporations to outsource their business communications and entertainment needs. TBA produced approximately 227 and 288 communication and entertainment events in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The reduced number of events reflects a reduction in customer demand during 2002 as a result of the continued impact of September 11 and the global economic slowdown. However, the

targets clients with recurring ~~nature~~needs offor ~~certain~~business ofcommunications ~~these~~and entertainment ~~events~~services. ~~serves~~The asCompany’s client list encompasses a ~~source~~number of ~~more~~ ~~predictable~~industry ~~revenues~~sectors asincluding ~~they~~telecommunications, ~~occur~~information ontechnology, pharmaceuticals, afood ~~more~~service ~~regular~~and ~~basis~~insurance. ~~The~~Representative ~~large~~clients ~~number~~include ofNortel, ~~events~~SAP, ~~also~~BEA ~~provides~~Systems, ~~opportunities~~Motorola, ~~for~~Bristol ~~the~~Myers ~~Company’s~~Squibb ~~other divisions~~Company, ~~including~~ ~~corporate event opportunities for TBA~~McDonald’s Corporation, ~~artist~~and ~~management~~State ~~clients~~Farm.

The Corporate Communications division ~~serves~~specializes ~~its~~in ~~nationwide~~the ~~client~~creative development, ~~base~~design, production and staging of a wide range of internal and ~~from~~business-to-business ~~offices~~events inincluding: ~~Chicago,~~sales ~~Nashville~~conferences, ~~Salt~~business ~~Lake~~meetings ~~City~~and headline entertainment, product introductions and ~~San~~recognition ~~Diego~~events. ~~These~~TBA ~~offices~~believes ~~were~~that ~~assembled~~it ~~via~~has ~~strategic~~benefited ~~acquisitions~~from ~~over~~ the ~~past~~decision ~~five~~by ~~years. During~~an ~~2002,~~increasing ~~TBA~~number ~~elected~~of major corporations to ~~close~~outsource ~~Corporate~~their ~~Communications~~business ~~offices~~communications inand ~~Atlanta,~~entertainment ~~Dallas~~needs. Through its nationwide offices, ~~Phoenix~~TBA delivers a full range of strategic communications and ~~New~~entertainment ~~York~~services to its clients. The ~~closures~~Corporate Communications ~~were~~division ~~instituted~~emphasizes tothe ~~consolidate~~coordination and allocation of resources ~~operations~~and ~~into~~services ~~larger,~~between ~~more~~the ~~profitable~~division’s offices. ~~and~~TBA has long-standing relationships with freelance contractors in various production, ~~thus~~technical and creative disciplines, ~~reduce~~and ~~Company~~supplements its full-~~wide~~time staff with independent ~~expenses~~contractors where needed.

~~Through~~The Corporate Communications division serves its nationwide ~~offices,~~client ~~TBA~~base from ~~delivers~~offices ain ~~full~~Chicago, ~~range~~Nashville, ofSalt ~~strategic communications~~Lake City and ~~entertainment~~San ~~services~~Diego. toThese offices ~~its~~were ~~clients.~~assembled ~~The~~via ~~Corporate Communications~~strategic ~~division~~acquisitions ~~emphasizes~~over the ~~coordination~~past ~~and~~seven ~~allocation~~years. During of2002, ~~resources and~~TBA ~~services~~elected ~~between~~to ~~the~~close ~~division’s~~Corporate Communications offices. ~~TBA~~in ~~has long-standing~~Atlanta, ~~relationships~~Dallas, ~~with~~Phoenix ~~freelance~~and ~~contractors~~New inYork. ~~various~~The ~~production,~~closures ~~technical~~were ~~and~~instituted to consolidate ~~creative~~operations ~~disciplines~~into larger, ~~and~~more ~~supplements~~profitable ~~its~~offices ~~full-time~~and, ~~staff~~thus, ~~with~~reduce ~~independent~~Company-wide ~~contractors where needed~~expenses.

The Company has made four strategic acquisitions over the past ~~five~~seven years in assembling the Corporate Communications division. The Company believes, based on its experience, that the corporate communications industry is highly fragmented. Further, the Company believes that many of its competitors consist of a number of small, primarily regional companies that provide only a limited range of services. However, the Company believes that there are other competitors who have been in business longer and have larger staffs and whose business, like the Company’s, is full service in scope. The most important competitive factors include creative and production capabilities, quality and price. The Company believes that it can compete successfully in this market by utilizing the Company’s production capabilities and existing entertainment relationships to produce an exceptional event. TBA’s commitment to providing exceptional events has developed a loyal client base. The Company also competes with in-house corporate communications staffs of existing and potential clients and with staffs of hotel and convention centers.

ENTERTAINMENT MARKETING

The Entertainment Marketing division links global business with popular culture through the development, marketing and production of consumer-focused entertainment events, music marketing initiatives, concert tours, television broadcasts, recorded music products and brand building initiatives. This division forges new ways for clients to reach their audiences and realize their marketing objectives. The entertainment marketing division specializes in the creative development, design, production and execution of a broad range of marketing initiatives that may include: national music tours, lifestyle events, network television broadcast specials, point of purchase campaigns, premium/incentive programs, brand imaging campaigns, sponsorship fulfillment, experiential branding initiatives and consumer/trade promotions.

TBA provides companies with the power to reach and engage their customers in a fresh, contemporary manner utilizing relevant programming and experiential branding techniques to integrate their company or brand into the lifestyle of their consumers. The Entertainment Marketing division seeks to develop music-marketing programs that appeal to highly focused demographic segments. In addition, corporations are increasingly utilizing entertainment personalities as advertising tools, having recognized the effectiveness of concert/tour sponsorship as a cost-effective means to reach a target audience. The Company has produced sponsored music-marketing programs for clients that include CMT, Kelloggs, General Motors, and Nescafe. In addition, the Company ~~has~~ has produced major television broadcast events and specials for clients that include Turner Sports, NASCAR, Blockbuster and Hard Rock Café. The Company’s Entertainment Marketing division ~~also~~is ~~provides~~currently ~~unique~~characterized ~~opportunities~~by ~~for~~a ~~the~~relatively ~~Company~~small tonumber ~~show~~of ~~case~~accounts ~~artist~~with ~~management~~high ~~clients~~revenues Inper ~~addition~~account. As a result, ~~relationships~~the loss ~~with~~or ~~corporate~~addition ~~sponsors~~of ~~also~~any ~~create~~one ~~opportunities~~account tocould ~~sell~~have ~~corporate communications~~a ~~services~~material toeffect anon ~~expanded~~the ~~client base~~Company’s revenues.

The Company works with its clients to customize entertainment marketing to the exact specifications of that particular client. Over time, TBA believes existing clients will expand their programs, both by increasing the scope of existing components of programs and by adding new components to programs. The Company’s Entertainment Marketing division is currently characterized by a relatively small number of accounts with high revenues per account. As a result, the loss or addition of any one account could have a material effect on the Company’s revenues.

Effective April 2000, the Company became a member in a limited liability company, Earth Escapes, LLC (“EELLC”). One of the other members of EELLC was a former executive of the Company, whose employment with the Company terminated in December 2000. EELLC was formed to develop, produce and distribute a broadcast music special entitled Music in High Places. Music in High Places was broadcast primarily on cable and via web cast in 2000, 2001 and 2002. In lieu of cash distributions of profits from

EELLC, the Company was entitled to receive a percentage of the gross revenues of EELLC. In addition, the Company generated commission income in 2000 from the solicitation of sponsorships from Radio Shack and MSN for the Music in High Places series. In December 2002, TBA sold its interest in EELLC.

TBA has made two strategic acquisitions in the past five years, increasing the Company’s competitive position in the entertainment marketing industry, including the February 2001 acquisition of Moore Entertainment, Inc., a producer of music tours and corporate sponsored events. Management believes that there are a number of companies who compete with TBA in providing entertainment marketing services including specialty marketing companies, advertising agencies and other media and entertainment companies. Like the corporate communications business, the most important competitive factors include creative and production capabilities, quality and price. The Company believes that many of these competitors have been in business longer and have greater resources than those of the Company.

FAIRS AND FESTIVALS

The Fairs and Festivals division engages in the strategic development and production of a broad range of entertainment programs, national sponsorship initiatives and seasonal programming for many of the country’s largest fairs, festivals and rodeos. The Company provides entertainment, production and consultation services to more than 100 fairs, festivals and rodeos across North America, including Cheyenne Frontier Days, Greeley Stampede, Colorado and Nebraska State Fairs, and Country Thunder Festival. Combined, these programs reach over 17 million consumers annually. This unique platform provides a powerful opportunity to promote consumer brand awareness, product sampling and sales programs to corporate advertisers.

By utilizing established relationships with corporate clients, the Company can work with fair and festival clients to participate in mutually beneficial sponsorship programs, content development and facilities utilization strategies to help them successfully compete against other entertainment venues. In addition, the Company can utilize its strong entertainment background to offer its fairs and festival clients improved pricing for entertainment, while at the same time providing a more efficient and turnkey routing solution for its touring artist clients.

The Company’s Fairs and Festivals division was assembled through ~~the~~two ~~acquisition~~acquisitions ofcompleted ~~Romeo Entertainment Group (“Romeo”)~~ in ~~January~~ 2000 ~~and EJD Concert Services (“EJD”) in April 2000~~. The Company believes that the fairs ~~and~~ and festivals industry is highly fragmented and its competitors consist of primarily small, regional ~~Companies~~companies that, like the Company, have long standing relationships with their clients. The most important competitive factors are the ability to provide the fairs and festivals with quality music entertainment at a competitive price and to produce an exceptional entertainment event. The Company believes that it can compete successfully in this market by utilizing the Company’s extensive entertainment relationships with artists and artist booking agencies to secure musical talent while utilizing the Company’s production capabilities to produce a high quality event.

ARTIST MANAGEMENT

The Artist Management division develops and implements career strategies for music industry artists, including high-profile artists in country music (such as Brooks & Dunn, Terri Clark and Clay Walker), classic rock (such as Styx, ~~Foreigner~~ and Survivor), alternative rock (such as Papa Roach) and ~~contemporary~~ contemporary Christian (such as Point of Grace and Jaci Velasquez). The Company, as a leader in the production of corporate communications and ~~entertainment~~ entertainment programs, entertainment marketing initiatives, special events and ~~sponsorship~~ sponsorship procurement, is uniquely positioned to create opportunities for artists. Management believes that the Company’s familiarity with all facets of ~~the~~ the entertainment industry enables it to help artists create and capitalize on opportunities. With its expertise in concert production and corporate entertainment events and its relationships with venue managers, outside concert promoters, broadcasting executives and other industry professionals, management believes that the Company is uniquely positioned to offer services that can significantly enhance the careers of its clients. The Company develops long-term career strategies and represents music industry artists in the negotiation of recording, touring, merchandising and performance contracts. Using these integrated resources, the Artist Management team is unified around the strategy of creating long-term, sustained success for the Company’s artist management clients.

The Company has made five strategic acquisitions over the past ~~five~~six years in assembling the Artist Management division, including the July 2001 acquisition of Alliance Artists Ltd,. ~~which~~The ~~manages~~Company ~~Styx,~~believes ~~Survivor,~~that ~~Joe~~the ~~Stark~~artist ~~Band~~management ~~and~~industry ~~others.~~is Inhighly-fragmented ~~2000, 2001~~ and ~~2002,~~its ~~the~~competitors ~~Company~~consist ~~also~~primarily of ~~added~~small ~~other~~independent artist managers, ~~representing~~with ~~artists~~a ~~such~~limited asroster ~~Papa~~of ~~Roach~~clients, ~~World~~although there ~~Classic~~are ~~Rockers,~~several participants in the industry that have capabilities and ~~Foreigner~~resources comparable to and, ~~UB40~~in certain respects, ~~among~~greater ~~others~~than those of the Company.

The Company believes that the artist management industry is highly-fragmented and its competitors consist primarily of small independent artist managers with a limited roster of clients, although there are several participants in the industry that have capabilities and resources comparable to and, in certain respects, greater than those of the Company. Because of the highly fragmented nature of the artist management industry, the Company believes that there are a number of acquisition opportunities available to the Company, within various music genres, including country, pop and rock.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

During the first quarter of 2001, the Company approved a formal plan to discontinue its merchandising operations in order to better focus on its core business as a strategic communications and entertainment company. The disposition of the merchandising operations represents the disposal of a business segment. Accordingly, this former segment is accounted for as a discontinued operation.

BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company classifies its operations into the four business segments discussed above. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments.

GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which establishes accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and other intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives not be amortized but, instead, tested at least annually for impairment. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 beginning in the first quarter of 2002. The Company’s only identifiable intangible asset is goodwill.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company uses a two-step process when performing its annual review for goodwill impairment. The first step is to determine the fair value of the reporting unit (each of the Company’s four business segments) and compare this value to its carrying amount. The fair value is determined using a discounted future cash flow methodology. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, a second step is required to determine whether goodwill has been impaired and if so, measure the amount of the impairment. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142 in the first quarter of 2002, the Company determined that the goodwill of its Fairs and Festivals unit was impaired by $1,988,600, as a result of the earnings of that unit not meeting the earnings expectations set by the Company at the time the businesses were acquired. During the annual impairment review process as of November 2003, the Company determined that its goodwill was further impaired as a result of the carrying value of three of its four business segments exceeding the fair value of those units. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded goodwill impairment of $6,152,700, $3,184,000 and $1,063,500, relating to its Artist Management, Fairs and Festivals and Corporate Communications business segments, respectively. The decrease in fair value from November 2002 was due to a decrease in the projected future operating profits and cash flows from these business segments. The reduction in Artist Management is due primarily to reduced revenue projections from its artist roster and an increase in the compensation structure paid to retain senior executives. The reduction in Fairs and Festivals is due primarily to the projected revenue loss from the departure of a senior account executive. The reduction in Corporate Communications is due primarily to reduced revenue projections and gross margins due to heightened competition and an increase in the compensation structure paid to retain senior executives.

COMPETITION

In addition to the competitive factors outlined above for each of the Company’s four business groups, the success of the Company’s entertainment operations are dependent upon numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, including economic conditions, amounts of available leisure time, transportation costs, lifestyle trends and weather conditions.

SEASONALITY

The Company experiences quarterly fluctuations in revenue, operating income and net income as a result of many factors, including the timing of clients’ meetings and events, timing of artists’ tours and recording releases, weather related issues, delays in or cancellation of clients’ entertainment marketing programs, as well as changes in the Company’s mix among the various services offered.

5DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

~~Table~~ During the first quarter of ~~Contents~~2001, the Company approved a formal plan to discontinue its merchandising operations in order to better focus on its core business as a strategic communications and entertainment company. The disposition of the merchandising operations represents the disposal of a business segment. Accordingly, this former segment is accounted for as a discontinued operation.

TRADEMARKS

The Company has obtained registered trademarks for the “ TBA Entertainment Corporation” mark for television show production and programming. The Company has also filed Intent-To-Use Trademark Applications for the “TBA Entertainment Corporation” mark for the various other classes of goods and services in which the Company’s mark will be utilized. In addition, the Company has filed or intends to file Intent-To-Use Trademark Applications for other proprietary programs developed by the Company. There can be no assurance, however, that these trademarks will proceed to registration, and if so registered, that the trademarks, in any one or more classes, will not violate the proprietary rights of others, that any registration of the trademarks or the Company’s use thereof will be upheld if challenged, or that the Company will not be prevented from using the trademarks.

REGULATION AND LICENSES

The Company is subject to federal, state and local laws affecting its business, including various health, sanitation and safety standards. The Company’s entertainment operations are subject to state and local government regulation, including regulations relating to live music performances. Each live concert performance must comply with regulations adopted by federal agencies and with licensing and other regulations enforced by state and local health, sanitation, safety, fire and other departments. Difficulties or failures in obtaining the required licenses or approvals can delay and sometimes prevent the promotion of live concerts. The failure to receive or retain, or delay in obtaining, a license to serve alcohol and beer in a particular location could adversely affect the Company’s operations in that location and impair the Company’s ability to obtain licenses elsewhere. The failure or inability of the Company to maintain insurance coverage ~~materially~~could materially and adversely ~~could~~ affect the Company.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, ~~2002~~2003, the Company had approximately ~~130~~116 full-time and part-time employees. It is the Company’s intention to manage its growth consistent with its ability to attract and retain qualified employees to manage its operations. Over the course of any given event or program, the Company evaluates the production personnel requirements and determines the extent to which it must supplement its available employee base with the use of independent contractors or part-time employees. The Company believes that its relationship with its employees and independent contractors is good.

The Company has no full-time employees whose employment is covered by collective bargaining or similar agreements with unions; however, the Company does from time to time independently contract with or hire part-time union personnel, especially during the production of a particular corporate communication or entertainment marketing program and, accordingly, the Company is a party to certain agreements with unions governing the hiring and terms of employment of such personnel.

RISK FACTORS

If the Company does not Achieve its Operating Plan for 2004, the Company may have Insufficient Cash Flow to Fund Operations and Pay its Debt.

Achieving the Company’s operating plan for 2004 is critical to the future operations of the Company. Only a small portion of the Company’s expenses vary with revenue in the short term. Net income may be disproportionately affected by a reduction in revenue in 2004. Although management of the Company believes that the 2004 operating plan is achievable, if the Company does not achieve its revenue targets forecasted for 2004, it may not generate sufficient cash flows to fund future operations.

In addition, as of December 31, 2003, the Company was in default on substantially all its long-term debt. From January 1, 2004 to April 14, 2004, the Company completed a restructuring of all debt that was in default. The Company provided its 2004 operating plan, including its 2004 cash flow projections to its debt holders. These cash flow projections were used by the debt holders in determining whether to restructure the Company’s various notes payable. Although management of the Company believes that the 2004 operating plan is achievable, if the Company does not achieve its 2004 operating plan, it may not generate sufficient cash flow to make the scheduled principal payments required pursuant to the restructured bank term loan or restructured acquisition notes payable. Failure to make scheduled principal payments would result in the Company again being in default on its long-term debt which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Key Senior Executives may Leave the Company.

Certain of the Company’s key senior executives do not have long-term employment contracts with the Company and are not subject to any covenants prohibiting competition with the Company or solicitation of clients of the Company. In addition, the Company’s services to its customers are currently managed by a relatively small number of account executives and artist managers. Although no current key executive has informed the Company of their intent to terminate, a loss of these key senior executives and a loss of their clients could have a material adverse impact on the financial position and future operations of the Company.

Further Terrorist Attacks or Continuation of Global Economic Slowdown could Adversely Affect the Company.

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the global economic slowdown of 2001-2002 had a devastating impact on the operations of the Company. The Company experienced immediate program cancellations and postponements impacting greater than $15 million of revenue which management otherwise would have expected to have been realized during 2001. The economic slowdown also impacted the Company’s business activity throughout 2002. In 2003, the Company began to experience an increase in its corporate client sales activity as a result of the apparent beginning of an economic recovery. If there are further terrorist attacks or if the economic recovery does not materialize in the short term, the Company’s corporate client business may be adversely affected and, in turn, the Company’s revenue may experience another decline.

The Lengthy Sales Cycle and Increased Competition for Corporate Client Business could Adversely Affect the Company.

The corporate communications and entertainment marketing business segments typically have a lengthy sales cycle and are subject to delays beyond the Company’s control. In addition, as a result of the tightening economy, the Company’s customers may be reluctant to purchase the Company’s services and rely instead on internally developed programs. The slowdown in the corporate client business activity in 2001 and 2002 has also created increased competition for existing business, resulting in lower gross profit margins. Whether or not within the Company’s control, delays in the sales cycle or increased competition for customers could materially affect the Company’s financial position and future operations.

The Company may Lose Customers Due to its Financial Position.

Although the Company has experienced significant net losses for 2001-2003, the Company has successfully produced over 700 corporate communications events during that period. The Company has been able achieve these results by successfully managing its cash flow requirements, working with its vendors on payment terms and negotiating with its debt holders to restructure debt payments. However, as of December 31, 2003, the Company had a net working capital deficit of $3,947,300 and must achieve its 2004 operating plan in order to fund its operations and make scheduled principal payments on its debt. Certain of the Company’s customers may have financial requirements that the Company would be required to meet in order to become a vendor to the customer. Although no customer has indicated that the Company does not meet its financial requirements, if the Company fails to achieve its 2004 operating plan or if the financial condition of the Company worsens, such events could lead to the Company losing existing and potential customers resulting in a substantial loss of revenues.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company and/or its subsidiaries have entered into lease agreements with respect to leased office space in eight cities in which the Company operates. These leases expire at various dates through ~~September 2006~~December 2007. As of December 31, 2002, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, TBA Entertainment Group Dallas, Inc., owned the building in which its offices and production facilities were located, as well as certain vacant land adjacent to such building. As a result of the Company’s decision to close the Dallas office, the Dallas facility was reclassified as “Asset Held for Sale” as of December 31, 2002. In February 2003, the Company sold the land and building, using the proceeds to reduce the balance of its bank credit facility.

The Company has offices located in Hickory Valley, Tennessee in a building owned by a limited partnership, the general partner of which is a corporation owned by Thomas J. Weaver III and Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr., each an officer and director of the Company, and of which they also are limited partners. The limited partnership does not charge the Company rent for its Hickory Valley, Tennessee offices. The fair market rental value for this office space is not material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations.

TBA believes that the properties and facilities it ~~owns or~~ leases are suitable and adequate for the Company’s current business and operations. The ~~Company~~ Company anticipates that as it expands, it will require additional office space to to support such growth and believes that suitable space will be available as needed on commercially reasonable terms.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

InAs ~~November~~of ~~2001~~December 31, a2003, ~~Complaint~~the Company was ~~filed~~ in ~~the~~default ~~Marion~~on ~~County~~substantially ~~Superior~~all ~~Court~~of inits ~~the~~bank ~~State~~debt ofand ~~Indiana~~acquisition ~~against~~notes ~~TBA~~payable. ~~alleging~~On ~~breach~~March 18, of2004, ~~contract~~a ~~arising~~Verified ~~with~~Complaint ~~respect~~was tofiled against the ~~tax~~Company ~~indemnification~~by ~~provisions~~Richard ~~contained~~S. Smith in the ~~Stock~~Circuit ~~Purchase~~Court ~~Agreement~~of ~~related~~Cook toCounty, ~~the~~Illinois, ~~purchase~~seeking bypayment ~~TBA~~in offull aunder ~~merchandising~~one ~~company,~~of ~~now~~acquisition ~~classified~~notes aspayable ~~discontinued~~by ~~operations~~the Company. The ~~issue~~suit isseeks ~~the~~payment ~~amount,~~in iffull ~~any~~of all $566,751 ~~that~~of isoutstanding principal amount due ~~pursuant~~under to the ~~indemnification~~note, ~~provision.~~plus Inall accrued ~~January~~but ~~2003~~unpaid interest and all costs for enforcing the note, ~~TBA~~including attorneys’ fees and expenses. On March 29, 2004, the plaintiff agreed to a modification to ~~arbitrate~~the ~~this~~payment ~~dispute,~~terms ~~which~~of ~~arbitration~~the isacquisition ~~tentatively~~note ~~scheduled~~payable ~~for~~and ~~May~~an ~~2003~~extension of the due date until March 31, 2005. ~~Management~~In ~~does~~addition, ~~not~~the ~~believe~~plantiff agreed ~~that~~to withdraw the ~~outcome~~Verified ofComplaint, ~~this~~without ~~dispute~~prejudice, ~~will~~at ~~have~~the arequest of ~~material~~the ~~adverse~~entity ~~effect~~proposing onto acquire the ~~consolidated~~Company. ~~financial~~As ~~condition~~of orApril 14, ~~results~~2004, ofsuch ~~operations~~request ofhad not been made and the ~~Company~~Verified Complaint had not been withdrawn.

In January 2003, a Petition was filed in the Civil Court of New York against TBA alleging breach of contract arising from a real estate lease for office space in New York City. In 2002, TBA terminated its operations in New York and ceased paying rent in July 2002. TBA continued to try to sublease this office space throughout the remainder of 2002. The Petition seeks unpaid rent through the date of the filing, in the amount of approximately $140,000. The Company is in negotiations with the plaintiff in an effort to negotiate a buy-out of the remaining lease obligation. Management believes that it has adequately reserved for this obligation as of December 31, 2002.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

The annual meeting of stockholders of TBA Entertainment Corporation was held on November 20, 2002.

The stockholders approved the election of seven directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified.

Director	For		Withheld
Frank Bumstead		6,827,619		55,135
Charles Flood		6,827,619		55,135
Joseph C. Galante		6,827,619		55,135
W. Reid Sanders		6,827,619		55,135
Frank McKinnie Weaver		6,827,619		55,135
Thomas J. Weaver, III		6,827,619		55,135
Kyle Young		6,827,619		55,135

In addition, the stockholders voted 6,825,467 shares in ratification of BDO Seidman, LLP as the Company’s independent public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2002. Stockholders voted 51,100 shares against ratification of BDO Seidman, LLP with 4,000 shares abstaining.

~~PART~~ITEM II4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There were no meetings of the Company’s shareholders or matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2003. PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

(a) The Common Stock is listed for trading on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “TBA.” On March 3126, ~~2003~~2004, the last reported sale price of the Common Stock was $0.7644 per share. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices of the Common Stock as reported on the American Stock Exchange during each quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years.

		HIGH		~~HIGH~~		LOW		~~LOW~~
		2002
2003
First Quarter	~~First Quarter~~	$	1.35	$	~~4.15~~	$	0.76	$	~~3.10~~
Second Quarter	~~Second Quarter~~		0.99		~~4.00~~		0.70		~~1.60~~
Third Quarter	~~Third Quarter~~		0.93		~~2.53~~		0.50		~~1.33~~
Fourth Quarter	~~Fourth Quarter~~		1.20		~~2.03~~		0.60		~~1.08~~
		2001
2002
First Quarter	~~First Quarter~~	$	4.15	$	~~4.45~~	$	3.10	$	~~3.59~~
Second Quarter	~~Second Quarter~~		4.00		~~4.00~~		1.60		~~3.65~~
Third Quarter	~~Third Quarter~~		2.53		~~4.19~~		1.33		~~2.85~~
Fourth Quarter	~~Fourth Quarter~~		2.03		~~3.85~~		1.08		~~2.20~~

(b) The approximate number of holders of record of Common Stock on March 3126, ~~2003~~2004 was ~~141~~147. (c) The Company has not paid or declared cash distributions or dividends and does not intend to pay cash dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The Company currently intends to retain all earnings to finance the development and expansion of its operations. The declaration of cash dividends in the future will be determined by the Board of Directors based upon the Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors. (d) The following table summarizes as of December 31, ~~2002~~2003, the shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans:

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

	Number of securities
	Number of securities to		Weighted average
	to be issued upon		Weighted average		Number of
	be issued upon exercise		exercise price of		Number of securities
	exercise of outstanding		exercise price of		securities
	of outstanding options,		outstanding options,		remaining available for
	options, warrants		outstanding options,		remaining available
Plan category	warrants and rights		warrants and rights		future issuance
Plan category	and rights		warrants and rights		for future issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		857,100	$	4.20		542,900
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		1,314,100	$	4.20		85,900
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		40,000		4.75		—
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		40,000		4.75		- -
Total:		897,100	$	4.23		542,900
Total:		1,354,100	$	4.22		85,900

The only equity compensation plan of the Company that was not approved by the Company’s stockholders is the 1995 Stock Option Plan. The options outstanding under this plan were originally granted between August 1995 and April 1996. All of such options are fully vested and expire 10 years from the date of grant.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA (1):		2002				2001				2000				1999				1998
	2003				2002				2001				2000				1999
Revenues		$	49,131,800			$	60,404,800			$	78,540,300			$	38,618,700			$	26,020,300
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA (1):
Costs related to revenues			33,010,100				40,999,200				54,971,900				25,003,600				17,448,400
Revenues	$	47,932,200			$	49,131,800			$	60,404,800			$	78,540,300			$	38,618,700
Gross profit margin			16,121,700				19,405,600				23,568,400				13,615,100				8,571,900
Costs related to revenues		32,977,500				33,010,100				40,999,200				54,971,900				25,003,600
Selling, general and administrative expenses			16,491,000				19,764,100				19,471,900				10,578,000				6,601,100
Gross profit margin		14,954,700				16,121,700				19,405,600				23,568,400				13,615,100
Depreciation and amortization			677,600				2,898,100				2,479,800				1,535,200				673,300
Selling, general and administrative expenses		13,623,200				16,491,000				19,764,100				19,471,900				10,578,000
Equity in income of Joint Venture and other income			(478,400	)			(335,200	)			(272,700	)			(173,000	)			(343,700	)
Depreciation and amortization (5)		324,100				677,600				2,898,100				2,479,800				1,535,200
Net interest expense (income)			466,900				548,300				164,000				(262,100	)			(135,700	)
Goodwill impairment (5)		10,400,200				—				—				—				—
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes			(1,035,400	)			(3,469,700	)			1,725,400				1,937,000				1,776,900
Equity in income of Joint Venture and other income		(88,400	)			(478,400	)			(335,200	)			(272,700	)			(173,000	)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes			860,000				189,100				(1,531,600	)			(770,200	)			(98,300	)
Net interest expense (income)		566,000				466,900				548,300				164,000				(262,100	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations			(175,400	)			(3,280,600	)			193,800				1,166,800				1,678,600
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes		(9,870,400	)			(1,035,400	)			(3,469,700	)			1,725,400				1,937,000
Income (loss) from discontinued operations			—				(3,650,800	)			(92,500	)			359,200				992,400
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		56,800				860,000				189,100				(1,531,600	)			(770,200	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (5)			(1,988,600	)			—				—				—				—
(Loss) income from continuing operations		(9,813,600	)			(175,400	)			(3,280,600	)			193,800				1,166,800
Net income (loss)		$	(2,164,000	)		$	(6,931,400	)		$	101,300			$	1,526,000			$	2,671,000
(Loss) income from discontinued operations		—				—				(3,650,800	)			(92,500	)			359,200
EBITDA (6)		$	(255,700	)		$	(23,300	)		$	4,369,200			$	3,210,100			$	2,314,600
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (5)		—				(1,988,600	)			—				—				—
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations — basic		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)		$	0.02			$	0.14			$	0.21
Net (loss) income	$	(9,813,600	)		$	(2,164,000	)		$	(6,931,400	)		$	101,300			$	1,526,000
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations — diluted		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)		$	0.02			$	0.14			$	0.20
EBITDA (6)	$	1,419,900			$	(255,700	)		$	(23,300	)		$	4,369,200			$	3,210,100
Weighted average common stock Outstanding — basic			7,364,700				7,361,900				8,055,100				8,495,200				7,851,600
(Loss) income per share from continuing operations – basic	$	(1.33	)		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)		$	0.02			$	0.14
Weighted average common stock Outstanding — diluted			7,364,700				7,361,900				8,070,000				8,540,000				8,243,500
(Loss) income per share from continuing operations – diluted	$	(1.33	)		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)		$	0.02			$	0.14
BALANCE SHEET DATA (1):
Weighted average common stock Outstanding – basic		7,371,900				7,364,700				7,361,900				8,055,100				8,495,200
Working capital (2)		$	(3,622,000	)		$	(2,636,000	)		$	189,700			$	7,892,700			$	12,381,900
Weighted average common stock Outstanding – diluted		7,371,900				7,364,700				7,361,900				8,070,000				8,540,000
Goodwill, net (3)(5)			21,706,100				25,668,700				23,834,800				17,318,400				16,008,600
BALANCE SHEET DATA (1):
Net (liabilities) assets of discontinued operations			(211,800	)			(228,200	)			2,622,700				2,364,200				2,552,000
Working capital (2)	$	(3,735,500	)		$	(3,290,900	)		$	(2,636,000	)		$	189,700			$	7,892,700
Total assets			28,138,900				34,407,700				39,416,900				42,383,300				40,445,200
Goodwill, net(3) (5)		12,295,100				21,706,100				25,668,700				23,834,800				17,318,400
Long-term debt (3) (4)			3,562,300				7,340,600				4,373,600				3,596,400				4,755,700
Net (liabilities) assets of discontinued operations		(211,800	)			(211,800	)			(228,200	)			2,622,700				2,364,200
Treasury stock			(6,057,600	)			(6,080,500	)			(5,500,700	)			(2,062,100	)			(724,500	)
Total assets		20,656,300				27,807,800				34,407,700				39,416,900				42,383,300
Stockholders’ equity			15,566,700				17,719,900				25,242,500				27,858,800				28,515,700
Long-term debt (3) (4)		3,069,500				3,562,300				7,340,600				4,373,600				3,596,400
Treasury stock		(6,027,600	)			(6,057,600	)			(6,080,500	)			(5,500,700	)			(2,062,100	)
Stockholders’ equity		5,894,200				15,566,700				17,719,900				25,242,500				27,858,800

1) ~~Prior to 1998, the Company acquired and operated certain businesses that were sold in 1998.~~ In 1999, the Company acquired a business that was discontinued in 2001. The discontinuation ~~and sale~~ of ~~these~~this ~~businesses~~business has resulted in the reclassification of the operating results and net assets and liabilities of ~~these~~this ~~businesses~~business to discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Company has completed ~~ten~~five acquisitions from ~~1998~~1999 to 2001. No acquisitions were made in 2002 and 2003. Results of operations of each of these acquisitions are included from their respective acquisition dates. The accounting for these acquisitions was in accordance with ~~the~~ purchase method of accounting. 2) Working capital represents total current assets ~~(excluding net short-term assets of discontinued operations)~~ less total current liabilities (excluding net short-term liabilities of discontinued operations). 3) In September 2002, the Company reduced its recorded goodwill and long-term debt by $3,518,400, representing the outstanding amount of promissory notes that ~~are~~were subject to earn-out adjustments at that time, as payment of such amounts ~~was~~were no longer considered probable. See ~~Note~~Notes 5 and 6 to the Consolidated ~~financial~~Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion concerning the Company’s long-term debt and acquisitions, respectively. 4) Long-term debt excludes notes payable and current portion of long-term debt totaling $2,105,500, $1,617,200, $1,830,000, $3,049,600, and $2,913,200 ~~and $759,600~~ as of December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, ~~1999~~ and ~~1998~~1999, respectively. 5) Upon the ~~2002~~ adoption of ~~Statement~~SFAS ~~of Financial Accounting Standards~~ No. 142, “Goodwill and other Intangible Assets” in the first quarter of 2002, the Company tested its goodwill for impairment. Based on the estimated fair market value of its fairs and festivals ~~group~~reporting unit, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment loss in the first quarter of 2002 of $1,988,600. Based on the annual test for goodwill impairment performed as of November 2003, the Company recorded a further goodwill impairment loss for 2003 of $6,152,700, $3,184,000 and $1,063,500, associated with the artist management, fairs and ~~festivals~~festival and corporate communications reporting ~~unit~~units. Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, the Company stopped amortizing goodwill on January 1, 2002. For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, goodwill amortization was $2,105,700, $1,800,000 and $940,900, respectively.

6) EBITDA is defined as earnings from continuing operations before interest income and expense, income taxes, ~~and~~ depreciation and amortization, goodwill impairment charges, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and reversal of prior years’ accrued interest. EBITDA is presented supplementally because management believes it allows for a more complete analysis of results of operations. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any measure of performance or liquidity as promulgated under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (such as net income (loss) or cash provided by or used in operating, investing or financing activities), nor should it be considered as an indicator of the overall financial performance of the Company. The Company’s calculation of EBITDA may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited.

The calculation of EBITDA is shown below:

	2002			2001			2000			1999			1998
	2003			2002			2001			2000			1999
Net (loss) income	$	(29,~~164~~813,~~000~~600	)	$	(62,~~931~~164,~~400~~000	)	$	~~101~~(6,~~300~~931,400	)	$	1101,~~526,000~~300		$	21,~~671~~526,000
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		1,988,600			—			—			—			—
Goodwill impairment		10,400,200			—			—			—			—
Loss (income) from discontinued operations		—			3,650,800			92,500			(359,200	)		(992,400	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			1,988,600			—			—			—
Income tax (benefit) provision		(860,000	)		(189,100	)		1,531,600			770,200			98,300
Loss (income) from discontinued operations		—			—			3,650,800			92,500			(359,200	)
Net Interest expense (income)		466,900			548,300			164,000			(262,100	)		(135,700	)
Income tax (benefit) provision		(56,800	)		(860,000	)		(189,100	)		1,531,600			770,200
Reversal of prior years’ accrued interest		(364,800	)		—			—			—			—
Net interest expense (income)		566,000			466,900			548,300			164,000			(262,100	)
Depreciation and amortization		677,600			2,898,100			2,479,800			1,535,200			673,300
Reversal of prior years’ accrued interest		—			(364,800	)		—			—			—
EBITDA	$	(255,700	)	$	(23,300	)	$	4,369,200		$	3,210,100			2,314,500
Depreciation and amortization		324,100			677,600			2,898,100			2,479,800			1,535,200
EBITDA	$	1,419,900		$	(255,700	)	$	(23,300	)	$	4,369,200		$	3,210,100

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The purpose of the following discussion and analysis is to explain the major factors and variances between periods of the Company’s results of operations. The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, beginning on page 2016.

INTRODUCTION

The Company is a strategic communications and entertainment company that creates, develops and produces comprehensive programs to reach and engage its clients’ target audiences. The Company produces a broad range of innovative business communications programs, develops and produces highly integrated entertainment marketing programs, develops content and entertainment programs for a nationwide network of fairs and festivals and develops and implements career strategies and corporate partnerships for its artist clients.

The Company has built this comprehensive communications and entertainment business model through a combination of internal growth and strategic acquisitions. Since April 1997, the Company has completed 11 strategic acquisitions and has built a comprehensive network of ~~nine~~eight offices to serve ~~its~~ its client base. In ~~2000~~2001, the Company completed the acquisitions of ~~Romeo~~Moore Entertainment ~~Group in January and EJD Concert Services (“EJD”) (in March) (collectively~~, ~~the “2000 Acquisitions”). In 2001, the Company completed the acquisitions of Moore Entertainment,~~ Inc. (“Moore”) in February and Alliance Artists, Ltd. (“Alliance”) in July (collectively, the “2001 Acquisitions”). The results of operations of the ~~2000 Acquisitions and the~~ 2001 Acquisitions are included from the corresponding acquisition dates. There were no acquisitions in 2003 or 2002.

GENERAL

Business Segments

In accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company classifies it operations according to four business segments. See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments.

Critical Accounting Policies

In response to the SEC’s Release No. 33-8040, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policy”, the Company identified the most critical accounting principles upon which its financial status depends. The Company determined the critical accounting principles to be related to revenue recognition, costs related to revenue and impairment of ~~intangibles and other long-lived assets~~goodwill.

Revenue Recognition

The Company continues to derive a majority of its revenues (6163%, 7061%, and 70% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001, respectively) from the production of innovative business communications programs to help corporate clients reach and engage their target audiences. The Company helps businesses effectively communicate their message via a broad range of business communications, meeting production, and entertainment production services. The Company receives a fee for providing these services, which may include developing creative content, providing comprehensive project management and arranging for live entertainment and related production services. Revenue is recognized when an event occurs. Costs of producing the event are also deferred until the event occurs. At December 31, ~~2002~~ 2003, deferred revenue was $35,~~560~~366,~~200~~800 compared to $3,~~335~~560,~~600~~200 at December 31, ~~2001~~2002. The increase is due primarily to deferred revenue having been received by December 31, 2003 on several new programs to be produced in the first and second quarters of 2004.

The remainder of the Company’s revenues are generated from its roster of artist clients (10%, 610% and 46% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001, respectively), entertainment marketing clients (86%, 8% and 158% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001, respectively) and fairs and festivals clients (21%, 1621% and 1116% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001). Commissions received from artists’ earnings are recognized in the period during which the artist earns the revenue. There are generally only minimal direct costs associated with generating revenue from artist clients. Entertainment marketing revenues and cost of revenues are recognized when the services are completed for each program or, for those programs with multiple events, apportioned to each event and recognized as each event occurs. Fairs and festivals also recognize revenue and cost of revenues when the services are completed for each program and when the event has occurred.

Costs Related to Revenue

Costs related to revenue is comprised of all costs associated with the production of an event, including talent fees, contracted services, equipment rentals, costs associated with the production of audio-visual effects and the cost of internal production labor. Direct out-of-pocket costs are deferred until the event occurs. Internal production labor costs are expensed as incurred. At December 31, 2003, deferred costs were $999,800 compared to $1,030,700 at December 31, 2002.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which establishes financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets.” The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 beginning with the first quarter of 2002. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives not be amortized but, instead, tested at least annually for impairment while intangible assets that have finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their respective useful lives. Accordingly, the Company ceased amortization of all goodwill, which is its only intangible asset with an indefinite useful life, on January 1, 2002. The Company has no other identified intangible assets.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company performs its annual review of impairment of goodwill in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141 by comparing the carrying value of the applicable reporting unit to the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then the Company measures potential impairment by assigning the assets and liabilities of the Company to the reporting unit and comparing the implied value of goodwill to its carrying value.

Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142 in the first quarter of 2002, the Company determined that the goodwill of its Fairs and Festivals unit was impaired by $1,988,600, as a result of the earnings of that unit not meeting the earnings expectations set by the Company at the time the businesses were acquired. During the annual impairment review process as of November 2003, the Company determined that its goodwill was further impaired as a result of the carrying value of three of its four business segments exceeding the fair value of those units. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded goodwill impairment of $6,152,700, $3,184,000 and $1,063,500, relating to its Artist Management, Fairs and Festivals and Corporate Communications business segments, respectively.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002

Revenues decreased $1,199,600, or 2%, to $47,932,200 for 2003 from $49,131,800 for 2002. Revenues from corporate clients increased 1% to $30,389,100 for 2003 from $29,966,700 for 2002. In late 2002, the Company closed corporate client group offices in New York, Dallas and Atlanta to consolidate operations into larger, more profitable offices. These closed offices accounted for $2,949,100 of revenues and 32 corporate client events in 2002. Excluding the impact from these closed offices, corporate client revenues for the remaining offices increased $3,371,500 or 12%, and the number of corporate client events remained relatively unchanged at 188. The average revenue per event in the remaining offices increased to $161,600 per event for 2003, composed to $135,900 per event for 2002. The increase in revenues and in average revenue per event in the remaining offices resulted primarily from two, new large events in the 2003 period with revenue in excess of $2 million.

Revenues from entertainment marketing clients decreased $1,129,800 or 27% from $4,116,400 in 2002 to $2,986,600 in 2003. The decrease is due primarily to the loss of programs formerly produced by an employee who terminated his employment with the

~~Costs~~Company ~~Related~~in early 2003. Revenues from artist clients were $4,634,600 for 2003, which is relatively unchanged from 2002. There were no significant changes in the Company’s artist roster between periods. Revenues from fairs and festivals clients decreased $454,000 or 4%, from $10,375,900 in 2002 to $9,921,900 ~~Revenue~~in 2003, primarily due to both a decrease in the number of fair and festival clients for which the Company executed buy/sell arrangements with respect to artist performances and to a decrease in average revenue per such arrangement.

~~Costs~~Cost ~~related~~of torevenues ~~revenue~~decreased is$32,600 ~~comprised~~from of$33,010,100 ~~all~~for ~~costs~~2002 ~~associated~~to $32,977,500 ~~with~~for ~~the production~~2003. Cost of ~~an event~~revenues, ~~including~~as ~~talent~~a ~~fees,~~percentage ~~contracted~~of ~~services~~revenues, ~~equipment~~increased ~~rentals~~from 2002 to 2003, ~~costs~~resulting ~~associated~~in ~~with~~a ~~the~~decrease ~~production~~in ofgross ~~audio-visual~~profit ~~effects~~margin ~~and~~to ~~the~~31.2% for ~~cost~~2003 offrom ~~internal~~32.8% ~~production~~in ~~labor~~2002. ~~Direct~~The ~~out-of-pocket~~decrease ~~costs~~in ~~are~~the ~~deferred~~total gross margin percentage is ~~until~~due primarily to lower gross margins on corporate client events in the ~~event~~2003 period ~~occurs~~due to increased competitive pricing to secure new corporate events. This ~~Internal~~decrease ~~production~~was ~~labor~~partially ~~costs~~offset ~~are~~by ~~expensed~~an asincrease in gross margins on ~~incurred.~~entertainment Atmarketing ~~December 31,~~programs ~~2002,~~as ~~deferred~~more ~~costs~~programs were ~~$1,030,700 compared~~produced tofor ~~$424,200~~a atflat ~~December 31~~fee, with ~~2001~~minimal cost of revenues.

~~Impairment~~Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2,867,800, or 17%, to $13,623,200 for 2003 compared to $16,491,000 for 2002. The decrease results primarily from cost savings in the corporate client group, including reduced expenses from the closure of ~~Intangibles~~the New York, Dallas and Atlanta offices in late 2002, reductions in overall headcount and related compensation costs, and a reduction in travel related and other general and administrative costs. The reduction was partially offset by increased compensation costs incurred in 2003 in the artist client group due to the addition of new artist managers and the restructuring of compensation agreements to retain certain existing artist managers.

~~Intangible~~Depreciation expense decreased $353,500, or 52%, to $324,100 for 2003 from ~~assets~~$677,600 ~~consist~~for 2002. The decrease resulted primarily offrom ~~goodwill~~the ~~arising~~disposal of equipment from ~~business~~three offices, which were closed in 2002, and full depreciation ~~combinations~~of other fixed assets.

~~Upon~~In ~~the~~accordance ~~2002~~with ~~adoption~~the ofprovisions ~~Statement~~ of ~~Financial~~SFAS ~~Accounting Standard~~ No. 142, “Goodwill and ~~other Intangible Assets~~Other Intangibles”, the Company ~~tested~~performs its ~~goodwill~~ annual review for goodwill impairment in November of each year. Based on the ~~estimated~~results ~~fair market value~~ of ~~its~~the ~~fairs~~November 2003 ~~and festivals group~~test, the Company ~~recorded~~determined athe ~~goodwill~~carrying ~~impairment~~value ~~loss~~for inthree ~~the first quarter~~ of ~~2002~~its offour ~~$1,988,600~~business ~~associated~~segments exceeded ~~with~~ the ~~fairs~~fair ~~and~~value ~~festivals~~of ~~reporting unit.~~those ~~The~~business ~~Company~~segments. noAccordingly, ~~longer~~the ~~records~~Company recorded ~~amortization~~a of goodwill ~~and performs~~impairment ancharge ~~annual~~of ~~impairment~~$10,400,200 ~~test~~ in the fourth quarter. ~~During the~~of ~~year~~2003. ~~management~~No ~~will~~annual ~~also~~goodwill ~~review~~impairment ~~each~~charge ~~quarter~~was ~~for~~recorded ~~other~~in ~~factors that may indicate impairment~~2002.

Other income includes proceeds from the sale of the Company’s interest in a joint venture, formed to produce an entertainment marketing program in 2000 and 2001. For the years 2003 and 2002, the Company recognized $70,700 and $63,000 of income, respectively, from this sale. Other income for the 2002 period also included $364,800 from the reversal of accrued interest expense recorded in prior years associated with contingent promissory notes payable related to certain of the Company’s acquisitions in 1999-2001. The Company is no longer accruing interest on this contingent purchase price consideration until the actual payment is determined.

Net interest expense increased $99,100, or 21% to $566,000 for 2003 from $466,900 for 2002. The change is attributable primarily to increased interest expense associated with additional bank borrowings in 2003, an increase in the interest rate paid on certain acquisition notes payable due to the Company being in default in 2003 and the amortization to interest expense of the fair market value of warrants issued in May 2003 in connection with the restructuring of the Company’s bank term loan.

The income tax benefit for the 2003 period is $56,800, or 0.6%, on a loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $9,870,400. This compares to an income tax benefit of $860,000, or 83%, for the 2002 period on a loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $1,035,400. The effective tax rates reflect statutory tax rates adjusted for estimated book/tax differences. The primary reason contributing to the large income tax benefit in the prior year was the recoverable federal taxes paid in years prior to 2002. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had utilized the majority of its income tax carrybacks. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $5,253,200, related primarily to net operating loss carryforwards and the timing of deductibility of goodwill amortization and impairment charges. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset. Realization of the future tax benefits related to this deferred tax asset is dependent upon many factors, including the ability to generate taxable income within the Company’s net operating loss carry forward period. Until the Company recognizes net income, no further tax benefit will be recognized.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 AND 2001

Revenues decreased $11,273,000, or 19%, to $49,131,800 for 2002 from $60,404,800 for 2001. Revenues from the corporate client group decreased $12,227,500, or 29%, from $42,194,200 in 2001 to $29,966,700 in 2002. The number of corporate client events decreased to 227 in 2002 from 288 in 2001, due to a reduction in customer demand during 2002 as a result of the continued impact of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the global economic slowdown which began in 2001 and continued throughout 2002.

~~FINANCIAL~~The ~~IMPACT~~average OFrevenue ~~SEPTEMBER~~per 11event ~~TERRORIST~~decreased ~~ATTACKS~~to ~~AND~~$131,300 ~~GLOBAL~~per ~~ECONOMIC~~event ~~SLOWDOWN~~for 2002, compared to $146,500 per event for 2001 due to a reduction in the number of large corporate events produced in 2002. In 2002, the Company produced 32 events with revenues in excess of $250,000, versus 36 such events in 2001. The reduction is due primarily to certain larger corporate events that occurred in 2001, which were not repeated or were scaled back due to the global economic slowdown.

~~The~~Revenues ~~September 11~~from the entertainment marketing client group decreased $754,900, or 15%, from $4,871,100 in 2001 ~~terrorist~~to ~~attacks~~$4,116,400 ~~had~~in a2002. ~~significant~~The ~~negative~~decrease ~~impact~~is onprimarily ~~the~~due ~~nation’s~~to ~~economy~~two ~~and~~larger ~~the~~2001 ~~Company’s~~entertainment ~~corporate~~marketing ~~clients’~~programs ~~businesses~~that indid not ~~particular~~repeat in 2002. AsThe adecrease ~~result,~~was ~~the~~partially ~~Company~~offset ~~experienced~~by ~~significantly~~an ~~reduced revenues~~increase in ~~2001,~~the ~~with~~number of ~~particular~~smaller ~~impact~~entertainment onmarketing ~~the~~programs ~~third~~ and ~~fourth~~promoted ~~quarters.~~music ~~The~~tour dates ~~Company~~occurring ~~also~~in ~~experienced~~2002. ~~some~~Revenues ~~cancellations~~from ofartist ~~programs~~clients, ~~that~~which were ~~scheduled~~not tosignificantly ~~take~~impacted ~~place~~by inthe ~~early~~September 11, ~~2002.~~2001, ~~The~~terrorist ~~global~~attacks, ~~economic~~increased ~~slowdown~~$1,013,100, ~~that~~or 28%, ~~began~~to $4,672,800 in 2002 from $3,659,700 in 2001. Of this increase, ~~and~~$458,400 is attributed to a full year of operations of Alliance, which was ~~exacerbated~~acquired byin July 2001. ~~the~~The ~~terrorist~~remaining ~~attacks,~~increase ~~has~~is ~~continued~~due to ~~impact~~revenues ~~the Company~~generated by TBA’s expanding ~~corporate~~roster of artist clients. Revenues from the fairs and festivals client ~~business~~group ~~activity~~increased ~~throughout~~$695,900, ~~2002~~or 7%, ~~with~~to ~~particular~~$10,375,900 in 2002 from $9,680,000 ~~impact~~in ~~during~~2001. This increase is reflective of the ~~first~~25% ~~half~~increase in the number of fairs and festivals programs represented by TBA to 217 in 2002 from 174 in 2001.

InCost of ~~response~~revenues todecreased ~~this~~$7,989,100, ~~reduction~~or ~~in revenues~~19%, ~~the~~to ~~Company~~$33,010,100 ~~took~~for ~~aggressive~~2002 from ~~action~~$40,999,200 tofor ~~implement~~2001. ~~cost~~The ~~reductions~~decrease ~~necessary~~is attributable to ~~ensure~~the ~~that~~overall ~~its~~decrease ~~infrastructure~~in isrevenues ~~appropriate~~ for ~~expected~~the ~~business~~corporate ~~volumes.~~client ~~Such~~and ~~reductions~~entertainment ~~initiated~~marketing ~~during~~client groups ~~the~~from ~~third~~2001 ~~quarter~~to 2002. Cost of ~~2001~~revenues, ~~and~~as ~~continuing~~a ~~throughout~~percentage ~~2002~~of ~~include~~revenues, ~~reductions~~decreased 1%, resulting in ~~headcount~~ ~~(28~~an increase in gross profit margin to 33% ~~since~~for ~~August 31,~~2002 from 32% in 2001). ~~and~~The ~~related~~increase ~~compensation~~is ~~costs, elimination~~primarily ofattributable ~~unprofitable~~to ~~offices,~~the ~~elimination~~28% ofincrease ~~certain~~in ~~incentive~~artist ~~compensation~~client ~~costs~~revenues, ~~and~~which agenerally ~~reduction~~have inminimal ~~travel-related~~direct ~~and~~costs ~~other~~of ~~general~~revenues, ~~and~~offset ~~administrative~~by ~~expenses.~~lower Asgross aprofit ~~result~~margins ofon ~~these~~revenues ~~actions,~~from the ~~Company’s~~corporate ~~operating~~communications and ~~results,~~entertainment ~~EBITDA~~marketing ~~and~~client ~~cash~~groups. ~~flows~~The ~~improved~~lower ingross ~~the~~profit ~~second~~margins ~~half~~are a result of ~~2002,~~a ~~from~~more competitive corporate environment brought about by the global ~~levels~~economic ~~the~~slowdown ~~Company~~and ~~experienced~~an increase in the ~~second~~number ~~half~~ of ~~2001~~promoted ~~and~~music ~~first~~tour ~~half of~~dates, ~~2002~~which generally have a lower gross profit margin.

~~Based~~Selling, ongeneral ~~the~~and ~~Company’s~~administrative ~~current~~expenses ~~sales~~decreased ~~activity~~$3,273,100, ~~and~~or ~~absent major additional~~17%, ~~external~~to ~~disruptions~~$16,491,000 ~~the~~for ~~Company~~2002 ~~expects~~from ~~that~~$19,764,100 ~~consolidated~~for ~~revenues~~2001. ~~for~~The ~~2003~~decrease results ~~will~~primarily ~~remain~~from ~~relatively~~a ~~consistent~~comparative ~~with~~decrease ~~2002~~in ~~revenues~~sales ~~through~~expense ~~the~~attributable ~~first~~to ~~half of~~the ~~2003;~~reduced ~~with~~level ~~increasing~~of revenues and cost savings implemented beginning in the ~~second~~third quarter ~~half~~ of ~~2003~~2001, ~~due~~including toreductions ~~new~~in ~~programs~~headcount ~~the~~and related compensation ~~Company~~costs, ~~has~~elimination ~~already~~of ~~been~~costs ~~awarded.~~attributable Asto aunprofitable ~~result~~operations, elimination of ~~the~~certain ~~expected~~incentive ~~increase~~compensation costs and a reduction in ~~revenues~~travel-related and ~~impact~~other ofgeneral ~~reduced~~and ~~operating~~administrative expenses. The decrease is partially offset by the impact of incremental selling, ~~management~~general ~~believes~~and administrative ~~that~~expenses associated with the 2001 Acquisitions, a $250,000 ~~Company’s~~reserve ~~operating~~for ~~results~~an ~~and~~account ~~EBITDA~~receivable ~~will~~from ~~improve~~a corporate client in ~~2003~~bankruptcy, ~~over~~a $481,600 ~~the~~accrual ~~results~~for termination costs associated with closed offices and ~~achieved~~approximately in$280,000 ~~2002~~of costs associated with the termination of certain transactional discussions.

~~RESULTS~~ Excluding OF2001 ~~OPERATIONS~~goodwill ~~FOR~~amortization ~~THE~~of ~~YEARS~~$2,069,800, ~~ENDED~~depreciation ~~DECEMBER~~expense and 31other amortization decreased $150,700, or 18%, to $677,600 in 2002 ~~AND~~from $828,300 for 2001. The decrease results primarily from the retirement of certain equipment and other equipment being fully depreciated. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 in 2002 and no longer amortizes goodwill.

~~Revenues~~Other ~~decreased~~income ~~$11,273,000, or 19%, to $49,131,800~~ for 2002 ~~from~~ includes $60364,~~404,~~800 ~~for 2001. Revenues~~ from the ~~corporate~~reversal ~~client~~of ~~group decreased~~accrued ~~$12,227,500,~~interest orexpense ~~29%,~~recorded ~~from~~in ~~$42,194,200~~prior ~~2001~~years toassociated ~~$29,966,700~~with incontingent ~~2002. The number~~promissory ofnotes ~~corporate~~payable ~~client~~related ~~events decreased~~ to ~~227~~certain inof ~~2002~~the ~~from~~Company’s ~~288~~acquisitions in 1999-2001~~, due to a~~. ~~reduction~~The inCompany ~~customer~~is ~~demand~~no ~~during~~longer ~~2002~~accruing asinterest aon ~~result~~this ofcontingent ~~the~~purchase ~~continued impact of~~price ~~September 11~~consideration ~~and~~because ~~the~~payment ~~global~~is ~~economic~~not ~~slowdown~~considered asprobable. ~~more~~Other ~~fully~~income ~~described in~~for ~~“Financial~~both ~~Impact~~years ofincluded ~~September 11~~income ~~Terrorist~~from ~~Attacks~~a ~~and~~joint ~~Global Economic Slowdown” above. The average revenue per event decreased to $131~~venture,~~300~~ ~~per~~which ~~event for~~provided ~~2002, compared to $146,500 per event~~ for ~~2001~~the ~~due~~ Company to receive a ~~reduction~~percentage ~~in the number~~ of ~~large~~gross ~~corporate~~revenues ~~events~~of ~~produced~~the injoint ~~2002~~venture. InThe ~~2002, the~~ Company ~~produced~~received ~~32 events with revenues in excess of~~ $~~250~~63,000, ~~versus 36 such events~~ in ~~2001.~~2002 ~~The~~compared ~~reduction is due primarily~~ to ~~certain~~$299,700 ~~larger corporate events that occurred~~ in 2001, ~~which~~under ~~were~~this ~~not~~agreement. ~~repeated~~In December 2002, orthe ~~were~~Company ~~scaled~~sold ~~back~~its ~~due~~interest toin the ~~global~~ ~~economic~~joint ~~slowdown~~venture.

~~Revenues~~Net ~~from~~interest ~~the~~expense ~~entertainment marketing client group~~ decreased $~~754~~81,~~700~~400, or 15%, ~~from~~to $4466,~~871~~900 for 2002,~~100~~ versus innet ~~2001~~interest toexpense of $4548,~~116,400~~300 infor ~~2002~~2001. The decrease is attributable primarily ~~due~~to ~~two~~no ~~larger~~longer ~~2001~~accruing ~~entertainment~~interest ~~marketing~~expense ~~programs~~related ~~that~~to ~~did~~contingent ~~not~~purchase ~~repeat~~price inconsideration ~~2002.~~and ~~The~~lower ~~decrease~~interest ~~was~~expense ~~partially~~from ~~offset~~repayments byof ~~an increase in the number~~other ofacquisition ~~smaller~~notes ~~entertainment~~payable, ~~marketing~~partially ~~programs~~offset ~~and~~by ~~promoted~~increased ~~music~~interest ~~tour dates~~expense ~~occurring~~associated inwith ~~2002~~additional bank borrowings.

~~Revenues~~The ~~from~~income ~~artist~~tax ~~clients,~~benefit ~~which~~for ~~were~~2002 ~~not~~is ~~significantly~~$860,000 ~~impacted~~or by83%, ~~the~~on a loss from ~~September 11,~~continuing ~~2001,~~operation ~~terrorist~~before ~~attacks,~~taxes ~~increased~~of $1,~~013~~035,400 compared to an income tax benefit of $189,100, or 225%, ~~to $4,672,800~~for in2001 ~~2002~~on a loss from continuing operations before taxes of $3,~~659~~469,700, inand ~~2001.~~reflects Ofstatutory ~~this~~tax ~~increase,~~rates ~~$458,400~~adjusted isfor ~~attributed~~estimated topermanent abook/tax ~~full~~differences. ~~year~~The ofprimary ~~operations~~reason ofcontributing ~~Alliance,~~to the ~~which~~income ~~was~~tax ~~acquired~~benefit increase in ~~July~~the current year is the additional ~~2001.~~recoverable ~~The~~federal ~~remaining~~taxes ~~increase~~paid isin ~~due~~prior toyears. ~~revenues~~At ~~generated~~December 31, by2002, ~~our~~the ~~TBA’s~~Company ~~expanding roster~~had utilized the majority of ~~artist~~its ~~clients~~tax carrybacks.

~~Revenues~~In ~~from~~2002, the ~~fairs~~Company ~~and~~recognized ~~festivals~~a ~~client~~goodwill ~~group~~impairment ~~increased~~loss of $~~695~~1,~~900~~988, or600 ~~7%,~~related to ~~$10,375,900~~the inadoption ~~2002~~of ~~from~~SFAS $9No. 142,~~680,000~~ in“Goodwill ~~2001.~~and ~~This~~Other ~~increase is~~Intangibles”. ~~reflective~~Pursuant ofto the ~~25%~~transitional ~~increase~~rules inof ~~the~~SFAS ~~number~~No. 142, ofthis ~~fairs~~loss ~~and~~was ~~festivals~~recorded ~~programs~~in ~~represented~~the byfirst ~~TBA~~quarter toof ~~217 in~~ 2002 ~~from~~as ~~174 in 2001.~~a

Cost of revenues decreased $7,989,100, or 19%, to $33,010,100 for 2002 from $40,999,200 for 2001. The decrease is attributable to the overall decrease in revenues for the corporate client and entertainment marketing client groups from 2001 to 2002. Cost of revenues, as a percentage of revenues, decreased 1%, resulting in an increase in gross profit margin to 33% for 2002 from 32% in 2001. The increase is primarily attributable to the 22% increase in artist client revenues, which generally have minimal direct costs of revenues, offset by lower gross profit margins on revenues from the corporate communications and entertainment marketing client groups. The lower gross profit margins are a result of a more competitive corporate environment brought about by the global economic slow down and an increase in the number of promoted music tour dates, which generally have a lower gross profit margin.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $3,323,800, or 17%, to $16,440,300 for 2002 from $19,764,100 for 2001. The decrease results primarily from a comparative decrease in sales expense attributable to the reduced level of revenues and cost

cumulative ~~savings~~effect ~~implemented beginning in the third quarter~~ of ~~2001,~~accounting ~~including reductions~~change. inThere ~~headcount~~was ~~and~~no ~~related~~tax ~~compensation~~effect ~~costs, elimination~~ of ~~costs~~this ~~attributable~~impairment toas ~~unprofitable~~none ~~operations, elimination~~ of ~~certain incentive compensation costs and a reduction in travel-related and other general and administrative expenses. The decrease is partially offset by~~ the ~~impact~~goodwill ~~of incremental~~impairment ~~selling,~~loss ~~general~~was ~~and~~deductible ~~administrative expenses associated with the 2001 Acquisitions, a $250,000 reserve~~ for ~~an account receivable from a~~tax ~~corporate client in bankruptcy, a $481,600 accrual for termination costs~~purposes. ~~associated with closed offices and approximately $280,000 of costs associated~~ ~~with the termination of certain transactional discussions.~~

Excluding 2001 goodwill amortization of $2,069,800, depreciation expense and other amortization decreased $150,800, or 8%, to $677,600 in 2002 from $828,400 for 2001. The decrease results primarily from the retirement of certain equipment and other equipment being fully depreciated. The Company adopted FAS142 in 2002 and no longer amortizes goodwill.

Other income for 2002 includes $364,800 from the reversal of accrued interest expense recorded in prior years associated with contingent promissory notes payable related to certain of the Company’s acquisitions in 1999-2001. The Company is no longer accruing interest on this contingent purchase price consideration because payment is not considered probable. Other income for both years included income from an agreement with EELLC, which provided for the Company to receive a percentage of gross revenues of EELLC. The Company received $63,000 in 2002 compared to $299,700 in 2001 under this agreement. In December 2002, the Company sold its interest in EELLC.

Net interest expense decreased $81,400 to $466,900 for 2002, versus net interest expense of $548,400 for 2001. The decrease is attributable primarily to no longer accruing interest expense related to contingent purchase price consideration and lower interest expense from repayments of other acquisition notes payable, offset by increased interest expense associated with additional bank borrowings.

The income tax benefit for 2002 is $860,000 or 83%, on a loss from continuing operation before taxes of $1,035,400 compared to an income tax benefit of $189,100, or 5%, for 2001 on a loss from continuing operations before taxes of $3,469,700, and reflects statutory tax rates adjusted for estimated permanent book/tax differences. The primary reason contributing to the income tax benefit increase in the current year is the additional recoverable federal taxes paid in prior years. At December 31, 2002, no further income tax carryback is available.

In 2002, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment loss of $1,988,600 related to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles”. Pursuant to the transitional rules of SFAS No. 142, this loss was recorded in the first quarter of 2002 as a cumulative effect of accounting change. There was no tax effect of this impairment as none of the goodwill impairment loss was deductible for tax purposes.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 AND 2000

For the 2001 period, results of operations of each of the 2001 Acquisitions are included from their respective acquisition dates. Results of operations of each of the 2000 Acquisitions are included from the corresponding acquisition dates in 2000.

Revenues decreased $18,135,500, or 23%, to $60,404,800 for 2001 from $78,540,300 for 2000. Of the total decrease, $13,055,900 was attributable to corporate client revenues, which decreased 24% to $42,194,200 for 2001 from $55,250,100 for 2000. The number of corporate client events decreased to 288 for 2001 from 433 for 2000 due to a reduction in customer demand during 2001 attributable to matters discussed more fully in “Financial Impact of September 11 Terrorist Attacks and Global Economic Slowdown” above. Due, in part, to an additional major event produced during the second quarter of 2001, the average revenue per event increased to $146,500 for 2001 from $127,600 for 2000. During 2001, the Company produced 36 corporate client events with revenues in excess of $250,000 compared to 48 such events during 2000. For the first six months of 2001, however, the corporate client group had experienced an increase versus the first six months of 2000 in revenues and events with revenues in excess of $250,000. Accordingly, the aforementioned shortfalls for the full year of 2001 are solely attributable to a decrease in comparative activity for the second half of the year.

Revenues from entertainment marketing clients decreased $ 6,521,600, or 57% from $11,392,700 in 2000 to $4,871,100 in 2001. The decrease is primarily due to the impact of three major, low-margin entertainment marketing programs delivered during the first and third quarters of 2000 that the Company elected not to pursue during 2001, which were partially offset by a new major entertainment marketing project delivered during the second quarter of 2001.

Revenues from artist clients, which were not significantly impacted by the September 11,2001 terrorist attacks, increased $146,500, or 4%, from $3,513,200 in 2000 to $3,659,700 in 2001. This increase is primarily attributed to the July 2001 acquisition of Alliance, offset in part by the loss of revenue in 2001 from to the departure of an artist client.

Revenues from fairs and festivals clients increased $1,295,700 or 15%, from $8,384,300 in 2000 to $9,680,000 in 2001, primarily due to an increase in the number of fair and festival clients for which the Company executed buy/sell arrangements with respect to artist performances.

Cost of revenues decreased $13,972,700, or 25%, from $54,971,900 for 2000 to $40,999,200 for 2001. The overall decrease is due to the decrease in revenues for the corporate client and entertainment marketing client groups from 2000 to 2001. Cost of revenues, as a percentage of revenues, decreased from 2000 to 2001, resulting in an increase in gross profit margin to 32% for 2001 from 30% in 2000. This increase is primarily attributable to the decision not to pursue low-margin entertainment marketing programs during 2001, partially offset by lower gross margins on buy/sell arrangements executed with respect to artist performances for fairs and festivals clients.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $292,200, or 2%, to $19,764,100 for 2001 compared to $19,471,900 for 2000. The increase results primarily from incremental selling, general and administrative expenses associated with the acquisitions of EJD (in March 2000), Moore (in February 2001) and Alliance (in July 2001), increased personnel and related operating expenses added during the second half of 2000 associated with the increased levels of business from corporate clients during that period and increased marketing costs to address the reduction in corporate client group revenues in 2001. These selling, general and administrative expense increases were substantially offset by cost savings implemented during the third quarter of 2001, which included reductions in headcount and related compensation costs, elimination of certain incentive compensation costs, and a reduction in travel-related and other general and administrative expenses.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $418,300, or 17%, to $2,898,100 for 2001 from $2,479,800 for 2000. The increase results primarily from the amortization of goodwill associated with the Moore and EJD acquisitions. Amortization of goodwill totaled $2,069,800 in 2001, as compared to $1,743,600 for 2000. The remainder of the increase is attributable to increased depreciation on incremental property and equipment additions.

Other income is comprised primarily of income from an agreement with EELLC, which provided for the Company to receive a percentage of gross revenues, as defined, of EELLC. For the years 2001 and 2000, the Company recognized $221,900 and $272,700 of income, respectively, from this agreement.

For 2001, net interest expense increased $384,300 to $548,300 for 2001 from $164,000 for 2000. The change is attributable primarily to increased interest expense associated with additional outstanding debt related to the 2000 Acquisitions and 2001 Acquisitions, and additional bank borrowings, as well as lower interest income from decreasing cash balances resulting from the use of cash for investing and financing activities.

The income tax benefit for the 2001 period is $189,100, or 5%, on a loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $3,469,700. This compares to an income tax provision of $1,531,600, or 89%, for the 2000 period on income from continuing operations before income taxes of $1,725,400. The effective tax rates reflect statutory tax rates adjusted for estimated book/tax differences and reflect the significant impact of nondeductible amortization of goodwill from certain of the Company’s acquisitions. Nondeductible amortization of goodwill totaled $1,248,900 and $1,024,700 for 2001 and 2000, respectively. In addition, the income tax benefit for 2001 has been reduced by a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty as to the realization of the future tax benefits related to the Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2001.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In March 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of Karin Glass & Associates Inc. and affiliated companies (collectively, “KGA”). KGA, along with two smaller acquisitions completed prior to 1999, comprised the Company’s merchandising operations. During the first quarter of 2001, the Company approved a formal plan to discontinue its merchandising operations in order to better focus on its core business as a strategic communications and entertainment company. The disposition of the merchandising operations represents the disposal of a business segment under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 30. Accordingly, this former segment is accounted for as a discontinued operation. Operating results of this business segment and other information for discontinued operations appear in the notes to consolidated financial statements captioned “Dispositions” (Note 7).

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

~~The~~Although ~~September 11,~~the ~~2001~~operations ~~terrorist~~of ~~attacks~~the ~~had~~Company, aexcluding ~~significant~~the ~~negative~~ impact of goodwill onimpairment, ~~the~~improved ~~nation’s~~in ~~economy~~2003 ~~and~~over 2002, the Company’s ~~corporate~~is ~~clients’~~still ~~businesses~~recovering infrom ~~particular.~~the Asimpact aof ~~result~~the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the ~~Company~~global ~~experienced~~economic slowdown, which significantly reduced ~~revenues~~ cash flows and resulted in ~~2001,~~a ~~with~~working capital ~~particular~~deficit ~~impact~~of on$2,912,200, ~~the~~including ~~third~~$1,830,000 of notes payable and current ~~fourth~~portion ~~quarters~~of long-term debt, as of December 31, 2001. The Company ~~also~~took aggressive ~~experienced~~actions ~~some~~beginning ~~cancellations~~in ofthe ~~programs~~third ~~that~~quarter ~~were~~of ~~scheduled~~2001 to reduce expenses in ~~take~~response ~~place~~to the significant continuing reduction in ~~early~~revenues ~~2002~~attributable to those events. ~~The~~Those ~~global~~actions ~~economic~~have ~~slowdown~~brought ~~that~~the ~~began~~Company’s expenses in ~~2001~~line with the lower revenues. However, in 2002 and 2003, the Company has not been ~~which~~successful ~~was~~in ~~exacerbated~~restructuring byits ~~the~~bank ~~terrorist~~debt ~~attacks~~and acquisition notes payable on a long-term basis. Accordingly, ~~has~~payment ~~continued~~commitments tounder ~~impact~~its ~~the~~long-term debt have prevented the Company’s ~~corporate~~from ~~client~~improving ~~business~~its ~~activity~~working ~~throughout~~capital ~~2002~~deficit. In order to better manage its ongoing cash requirements, ~~with~~the ~~particular~~Company elected to forego ~~impact~~making ~~during~~some of the ~~first~~scheduled ~~half~~principal payments on its bank term loan as well as scheduled principal payments on certain of ~~2002~~its acquisition notes payable beginning in June 2003.

~~Primarily~~As as a result of the ~~operating~~payment ~~losses~~reductions ~~incurred~~ in ~~2002~~2003, ~~cash~~the ~~and~~Company was in default ~~cash~~on ~~equivalents~~substantially atall its long-term debt as of December 31, ~~2002~~2003. ~~were~~From $January 1,~~527~~ 2004 to April 14,~~800~~ 2004, ~~compared~~the Company completed the renegotiation of the terms of all debt that was in default. The renegotiated terms extended the term of its bank term loan to March 31, 2005 and provided for a reduction in the current maturities of long-term debt due in 2004 to $2,~~151~~105,500 from $4,692,200. atThe Company has no borrowing capabilities under any of its loan agreements as of December 31, ~~2001.~~2003 Inand ~~addition~~April 14, ~~the~~2004. The Company’s ~~had~~liquidity aneeds for the foreseeable future continue to be primarily for repayment of indebtedness and for working capital. ~~deficit~~Capital expenditures will be focused on equipment ofreplacements ~~$3,622,000~~and atare ~~December 31~~not expected to be significant. Based on current cash flow projections for 2004, ~~2002~~management ~~compared~~believes that the Company’s future cash flows from operations and current cash reserves will be sufficient to asatisfy its current and future debt service, working capital ~~deficit~~requirements ofand ~~$2,636,000~~maintain debt covenant compliance through at ~~December~~least March 31, ~~2001~~2005. ~~Both~~However, ~~years~~there ~~exclude~~can ~~discontinued~~be ~~operations~~no assurance that management’s assumptions will correspond to actual events.

InThe ~~order~~Company tois ~~provide~~also ~~additional~~exploring ~~working~~strategic ~~capital~~opportunities ~~and~~for ~~to repay certain maturing bank indebtedness,~~ the Company ~~entered into a bank credit facility in October 2001~~. The ~~credit~~Company ~~facility~~has ~~provided~~retained ~~for~~an ~~maximum~~investment-banking ~~borrowings~~firm ~~of up~~ to ~~$4,050,000.~~ ~~The~~assist ~~credit~~the ~~facility~~Company ~~was comprised of: (a) a $1,050,000 term loan, repayable~~ in ~~monthly principal installments of $43,750 commencing November 1,~~ ~~2001,~~evaluating ~~with~~a anvariety ~~original maturity date~~ of ~~September 30,~~transactional ~~2003;~~ and ~~(b) a~~financing ~~revolving credit~~alternatives. ~~line~~On ~~of up to $3,000,000, with an original maturity date of June~~April 308, ~~2003. The credit facility was initially secured by all accounts receivable and bears interest~~2004, ~~payable monthly, at~~ the Company’s ~~choice~~signed ofdefinitive anmerger ~~interest~~documents ~~rate based~~for ~~upon LIBOR or~~ the ~~bank’s~~proposed ~~prime~~sale ~~rate, plus an incremental percentage~~of ~~margin,~~100% asof ~~defined in~~ the ~~loan~~capital ~~agreement.~~stock ~~Upon the October 2001 closing~~ of the ~~facility,~~ ~~the~~ Company. ~~borrowed~~The ~~$2,778,600~~proposed ~~($1~~sale,~~050,000~~ ~~under~~which ~~the term loan and~~requires $1shareholder approval,~~728,600~~ ~~under~~is ~~the~~expected ~~revolving~~to ~~credit~~close ~~line).~~in ~~The~~the ~~term~~second ~~loan~~quarter ~~proceeds~~of ~~were~~2004. ~~used~~Upon toconsummation ~~refinance~~of the ~~remaining~~transaction, ~~principal~~it ~~obligations~~is onanticipated that the Company’s ~~note~~will ~~payable~~no tolonger abe ~~bank and mortgage payable to~~ a ~~bank~~publicly ~~that~~traded ~~were outstanding in October 2001~~entity. Of Since the ~~revolving~~transaction ~~credit~~requires ~~line proceeds~~shareholder approval, ~~$963,000~~which ~~was~~has ~~used~~not toyet ~~repay~~been ~~all principal~~given ~~and~~as ~~interest due under the Company’s three revolving lines~~ of ~~credit~~April 14, ~~with~~ ~~the remaining $765~~2004,~~600~~ ~~retained~~and asis ~~working~~subject ~~capital.~~to additional Inconditions ~~January~~to ~~2002~~closing, ~~the Company~~there ~~borrowed~~can ~~the~~be ~~remaining~~no ~~$1,271,400~~assurances ~~balance~~that of the transaction ~~revolving~~will ~~credit~~be ~~line~~consummated.

~~The~~At ~~Company~~December 31, ~~was~~2003, ~~not~~the inCompany ~~compliance~~had ~~with~~cash ~~certain~~and ~~required~~cash ~~financial~~equivalents ~~ratios,~~of ~~specifically a debt/EBITDA ratio~~$2,620,900 ~~a fixed charge ratio~~ and a ~~minimum~~working ~~net~~capital ~~worth ratio,~~deficit as of ~~December 31~~$3,947,300, ~~2001.~~which ~~Pursuant to an April 2002 restructuring~~includes ~~agreement with the bank~~$2,105,500 ~~the~~of ~~Company~~notes ~~was~~payable ~~granted~~and ~~a temporary waiver of~~ the ~~financial~~ ~~covenant~~current ~~events~~portion of ~~default~~long-term ~~provisions~~debt ~~under the original loan~~and ~~agreement~~$211,800 ~~and~~of ~~the~~net ~~bank’s~~liabilities ~~forbearance~~ from ~~exercising~~discontinued ~~its~~operations. ~~available~~At ~~remedies~~December 31, ~~which extended through January 2~~2002, ~~2003. In addition, new financial covenants were established and~~ the Company ~~granted~~had ~~the~~cash ~~bank~~and ~~additional~~cash ~~security~~equivalents ~~for the entire restructured bank credit facility in the form~~ of a$1,527,800 ~~pledge of the shares of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries~~ and a ~~first~~working capital ~~lien~~deficit ~~deed~~ of ~~trust~~$3,502,700, onwhich ~~the Company’s~~includes ~~land and building located in Dallas~~$1, ~~Texas~~617,200 ~~which~~of ~~was~~notes ~~sold~~payable inand ~~February~~current ~~2003~~portion ~~with~~of ~~the bank’s consent (see Note 11). The maturity date for both the~~ long-term ~~loan~~debt and ~~revolving~~$211,800 ~~credit~~of ~~line~~net ~~was~~liabilities ~~extended~~from discontinued ~~to April 30, 2003~~operations.

~~The bank also agreed to provide the Company $500,000 of additional~~14 financing (“New Bank Loan”). The New Bank Loan was conditioned upon the funding of a second loan of $500,000 (“Affiliate Loan”) from an entity controlled by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“Heritage”). The New Bank Loan and the Affiliate Loan were repaid in June 2002, upon receipt of the Company’s federal income tax refund. In addition, the Company repaid $659,400 on the revolving credit line with proceeds from the Company’s federal income tax refund.

In order to provide the Affiliate Loan, Heritage obtained a $500,000 loan from an independent third party finance company (“Pass-Through Loan”). The Pass-Through Loan was secured by 950,336 shares of common stock held by the Chief Executive Officer (772,876 shares) and President (177,460 shares) of the Company and a personal guaranty of the President of the Company. The Pass-Through Loan was repaid concurrently with the repayment of the Affiliate Loan. As a condition to obtaining the Pass-Through Loan, Heritage paid a fee of $5,000 and interest accrued at 12% per annum. These costs were passed-through to the Company as part of the Affiliate Loan.

Although the Company has maintained its aggressive sales improvement efforts, the Company was in technical noncompliance with the revised financial covenants under the restructured bank credit facility as of December 31, 2002. In February 2003, the bank required the Company to use the proceeds from the sale of its Dallas facility (see Note 11), to repay the outstanding balance of the term loan ($393,700) and a portion of the revolving credit line ($92,500). After this repayment, there was $2,248,000 outstanding under the revolving credit line. In April 2003, the Company and the bank negotiated a further restructuring of the bank credit facility (“2003 Restructuring”). Pursuant to the 2003 Restructuring, the Company was granted a new waiver of the financial covenant events of default and the bank’s continued forebearance from exercising its available remedies, which now extends through January 1, 2004. In addition, the Company was granted the right to re-borrow up to $750,000 under the revolving credit line through May 31, 2003, for the purpose of making scheduled principal and interest payments and additional earn-out payments under the acquisition notes as well as for working capital purposes. Subsequent to May 31, 2003, the then outstanding

balance of the revolving credit line will be converted to a term loan (“2003 Term Loan”) and the Company will be required to make seven equal monthly principal payments from June 30, 2003 through December 31, 2003. The total amount to be repaid will equal the greater of the amount re-borrowed through May 31, 2003 or that amount which will cause the Company to be in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the October 2001 credit agreement. Interest will continue to be paid monthly. All remaining amounts outstanding under the 2003 Term Loan will be due April 30, 2004. The 2003 Restructuring provided for new financial covenants and reporting requirements and included provisions for an accelerated maturity date upon the occurrence of certain events including, among other things, an Event of Default (as defined) or the sale or change of control of a material amount of the Company’s assets. In consideration for entering into the 2003 Restructuring and for providing the first $500,000 of re-borrowings, the Company will pay the bank a fee of $40,000, payable $20,000 in August and October of 2003, and issued 177,645 warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. If the 2003 Term Loan is repaid on or before December 31, 2003 and there has been no sale of the Company within the six month period prior to repayment, the bank will return to the Company the lessor of (i) the unexercised warrants on such date and (ii) 88,822 warrants. If the Company re-borrows the remaining $250,000 available through May 31, 2003, the Company will issue additional warrants to the bank to purchase common stock of the Company at the rate of one warrant for every two dollars borrowed and at an exercise price of $0.01 per share.

The Company incurred net losses during 2001 and 2002, has $3,622,000 of negative working capital at December 31, 2002, and will experience seasonally lower operating results for the first half of 2003. However, the Company has significantly reduced its operating expenses and anticipates increased revenues in the second half of 2003 due to new programs the Company has already been awarded. Accordingly, management believes its operating results, EBITDA and cash flows for 2003 will improve from the levels the Company experienced in 2002. The Company’s liquidity needs for the foreseeable future are primarily for repayments of indebtedness and for working capital. Capital expenditures will be focused on equipment replacements and are not expected to be significant. Management believes that the Company’s future cash flows from operations, its current cash reserves and availability of funds under its revolving credit line will be sufficient to satisfy its current and future debt service and working capital requirements through at least March 31, 2004. However, there is no assurance that management’s assumptions will correspond to actual events.

The Company is also exploring strategic opportunities for the Company. The Company has retained an investment-banking firm to assist the Company in evaluating a variety of transactional and financing alternatives. However, since this process is still on-going, no assurances can be given that any proposed plans or actions can be effectively executed.

Cash Flow Statement Analysis

Summarized Statements of Cash Flow

		FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,	~~FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,~~
			2002				2001				2000
		2003				2002				2001
Net cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	~~Operating activities~~	$	$2,068,000	~~1,540,500~~		$	$1,540,500	~~1,646,700~~		$	$1,646,700	~~2,283,100~~
Investing activities	~~Investing activities~~		(310,900	~~(1,637,100~~)	)		(1,637,100	~~(1,812,100~~)	)		(1,812,100	~~(5,351,300~~)	)
Financing activities	~~Financing activities~~		(664,000	~~(511,800~~)	)		(511,800	~~(794,100~~)	)		(794,100	~~(5,568,300~~)	)
Discontinued operations	~~Discontinued operations~~		—	~~(15,000~~	)		(15,000	~~(640,400~~)	)		(640,400	~~(460,000~~)	)
			$	(623,400	)		$	(1,599,900	)		$	(9,096,500	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		$	1,093,100			$	(623,400	)		$	(1,599,900	)

Cash provided by continuing operations was $12,~~540~~068,~~500~~000, $ 1,~~646~~540,~~700~~500, and $ 21,~~283~~646,~~100~~700 for ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001, respectively. ~~The~~Despite ~~reduction~~net losses in each ~~year is~~of ~~due~~the ~~primarily~~last tothree ~~net~~years, ~~losses~~the ~~from~~Company ~~continuing~~was ~~operations~~able ~~incurred~~to ingenerate ~~2001~~positive ~~and 2002, offset by the add-back of non-~~cash ~~depreciation~~flows ~~and~~from operations ~~amortization~~primarily ~~and other~~from ~~items,~~managing the timing of collections of accounts receivable and payment of accounts payable and accrued liabilities and the timing of collection of deferred revenues and payment of deferred charges associated with programs occurring in the following year.

Cash used in investing activities was $1310,~~637~~900,~~100,~~ $ 1,~~812~~637,100, and $5 1,~~351~~812,~~300~~100, in ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001, respectively. In all years, cash was used to fund additional earn-out payments for acquisitions made in prior years. In 2001, initial cash payments were also made to acquire Moore ($1,100,000) and Alliance ($100,000). ~~and~~In ~~in 2000~~2003, ~~initial~~the ~~cash~~Company ~~payments~~realized ~~were~~proceeds ~~also~~of ~~made~~$503,300 tofrom ~~acquire~~the ~~Romeo~~sale ~~($3,475,000)~~of ~~and~~its ~~EJD~~Dallas ~~($540,000)~~office facility. Capital expenditures were $51,900, $51,600, and $376,200 ~~and~~in ~~$836~~2003,~~900~~ in 2002, ~~2001~~ and ~~2000~~2001, respectively~~. Capital expenditures were higher in 2000~~, ~~corresponding to the Company’s expansion during that period. Capital expenditures in 2001~~ and ~~2002~~ represent ~~primarily~~ primarily replacements of computer equipment.

Cash used in financing activities was $~~511~~664,~~800~~000, $~~794~~511,~~100~~800, and $5794,~~568,300~~ 100 for 2003, 2002, ~~2001,~~ and ~~2000~~2001, respectively, resulting primarily from the net payment of bank and acquisition debt and from the 2001 ~~and 2000~~ purchases of treasury ~~shares~~ shares pursuant to the Company’s stock repurchase program. No shares were repurchased in 2002 or 2003.

18Contractual Obligations

~~Table~~ Future minimum annual commitments under bank and other debt agreements, non-cancelable operating leases and employment obligations as of ~~Contents~~December 31, 2003, are as follows:

Commitments


	Payments Due By Period
			Less Than 1				3 - 5		More Than 5
Contractual Obligations	Total		Year		1 - 3 Years		Years		Years
Long-term debt - bank and other	$	5,175,000	$	2,105,500	$	2,971,800	$	97,700	$	—
Operating leases		1,576,400		740,900		787,200		46,100		2,200
Employment obligations		4,656,200		1,900,000		2,056,200		700,000		—

Total	$	11,407,600	$	4,746,400	$	5,815,200	$	843,800	$	2,200

Future minimum annual commitments under bank and other debt agreements and non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2002, are as follows:

	2003		2004		2005		2006		2007		Total
Bank and other debt	$	1,617,200	$	3,169,900	$	225,100	$	121,100	$	46,200	$	5,179,500
Operating Leases		669,400		545,500		266,700		169,600		—		1,651,200
Total	$	2,286,600	$	3,715,400	$	491,800	$	290,700	$	46,200	$	6,830,700

Capital expenditures will be focused on equipment replacements and are not expected to be significant.

Forward Looking Statements

The foregoing discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by such provisions. These statements include management beliefs regarding the future operations of the Company and the plans and objectives of management for future growth or sale of the Company. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future political, economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives of the Company will be achieved.

Other Recently Issued Accounting Standards.

In ~~August 2001~~May 2003, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“~~FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. ~~144~~150, ~~(SFAS 144),~~ “Accounting for ~~the~~Certain ~~Impairment~~Instruments orwith ~~Disposal~~Characteristics of ~~Long-Lived Assets,” which addresses the~~Both ~~financial~~Liabilities ~~accounting~~ and ~~reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets. This statement supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121~~Equity, ~~“Accounting~~” ~~for~~which ~~the~~establishes ~~Impairment~~standards ofon ~~Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of” and~~ the ~~accounting~~classification and ~~reporting provisions for the disposal~~ measurement of afinancial ~~segment~~instruments ofentered ainto ~~business~~or ofmodified ~~APB~~after ~~Opinion No.~~May 3031, ~~“Reporting the Results of~~ ~~Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions~~2003.” The adoption of SFAS ~~144~~150 in fiscal ~~2002~~2003 did not have a material impact on ~~the~~ the financial position or results of operations of the Company. ~~See note “for~~ ~~discussion of sale of Dallas land and building.~~

In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145 (SFAS No. 145), “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” effective on or after May 15, 2002. This Statement rescinds SFAS No. 4 and an amendment of that Statement, and SFAS No. 64. This Statement also rescinds SFAS No. 44. This Statement amends SFAS No. 13, to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The adoption of SFAS No. 145 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143 (SFAS No. 143), “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Statement requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the

liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2002, FASB issued Statement No. 146 (SFAS No. 146), “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” effective for activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). “ The adoption of SFAS No. 146 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In December 2002, FASB issued Statement No. 148 (SFAS No. 148), “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company is required to follow the prescribed format and provide the additional disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 in its annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 and must also provide the disclosures in its quarterly reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning with the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” which disclosures are effective for financial statements issued after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of FIN 45 as of December 31, 2002. The adoption of the measurement requirements of FIN 45 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Impact of Interest Rate Changes

The Company’s market risk relates to interest rate exposure on short-term borrowings. The Company does not use financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. Borrowings on the Company’s bank credit facility are at variable interest rates. All other borrowings are at fixed rates. At December 31, ~~2002~~2003, the ~~Company~~interest ~~had~~on ~~$2,340,600~~the ~~outstanding~~Company’s ~~under~~bank ~~a revolving~~ credit facility was ~~at an interest rate of~~ 4.5168% ~~percent~~. Management believes that a hypothetical adverse movement in the interest rates of ten percent of such recent rates would not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated ~~financial~~ financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The following financial statements required by this item are filed herewith:

	PAGE
Reports of Independent Certified Public Accountants		2117
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2002 and 2001		23
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002		19
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000		24
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001		20
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000		25
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001		21
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000		26
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001		22
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		2723
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		37

2016

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

ToBoard ~~the Shareholders~~ of ~~TBA~~DirectorsTBA Entertainment CorporationEncino, ~~Corporation:~~California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets of TBA Entertainment Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of ~~operation,~~ operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the ~~year~~two ~~then~~years in the period ended December 31, 2003. We have also audited the schedule listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our ~~audit~~audits. The consolidated ~~financial~~ statements of ~~TBA Entertainment~~operations, ~~Corporation~~stockholders’ equity and ~~subsidiaries~~cash asflows of ~~December~~TBA ~~31,~~Entertainment ~~2001~~ Corporation and subsidiaries for ~~each of~~ the ~~two~~year ~~years~~ended ~~then~~December 31, ~~ended~~2001 (before revision) were audited by ~~other~~ other auditors, who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements in their report dated April 16, 2002.

We conducted our ~~audit~~audits in accordance with auditing standards generally ~~accepted~~ accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and schedule are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and schedule. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement and schedule presentation. We believe that our audits ~~audit~~provide ~~provides~~ a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TBA Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the ~~year~~two ~~then~~years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

~~As discussed above~~Also, ~~the financial statements of TBA Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and for each of the two years~~ in the period ended December 31, 2001, were audited by other auditors, who have ceased operations. As described in Note 4, these financial statements have been revised to include the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002. Our audit procedures with respect to the disclosures in Note 4 with respect to 2001 and 2000 included (i) agreeing the previously reported net income to the previously issued financial statements and the adjustments to reported net income representing amortization expense (including any related tax effects) recognized in those periods related to goodwill, to the Company’s underlying records obtained from management, and (ii) testing the mathematical accuracy of the reconciliation of adjusted net income to reported net income, and the related earnings per share amounts. In our opinion, the ~~disclosures~~schedule ~~for~~presents ~~2001~~fairly, ~~and 2000~~ in ~~Note 4~~all ~~are~~material ~~appropriate. However~~respects, ~~we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to~~ the ~~2001~~information ~~and~~set ~~2000 consolidated~~forth financial statements of the Company other than with respect to such disclosure and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2001 or 2000 consolidated financial statements taken as a wholetherein.

As discussed above, the financial statements of TBA Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and for the year then ended, were audited by other auditors, who have ceased operations. As described in Note 4, these financial statements have been revised to include the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and other Intangible Assets,” which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002. Our audit procedures with respect to the disclosures in Note 4 with respect to 2001 included (i) agreeing the previously reported net income in the previously issued financial statements and the adjustments to reported net income representing amortization expense (including any related tax effects) recognized in those periods related to goodwill, to the Company’s underlying records obtained from management, and (ii) testing the mathematical accuracy of the reconciliation of adjusted net income to reported net income, and the related earnings per share amounts. In our opinion, the disclosures for 2001 in Note 4 are appropriate. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to such disclosures and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2001 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

The quarterly financial data in Note 13 contain information that we did not audit, and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion on that data. We did not review the quarterly data for the three month period ended March 31, 2002 in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants because we were not engaged to do so.

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Los Angeles, California ~~February 21~~March, ~~2003~~11, 2004, except for Notes 15 and 5,11 which are as of April ~~10,~~ ~~2003.~~14, 2004

2117

This report is a conformed copy of the report previously issued by Arthur Anderson LLP and has not been reissued.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To TBA Entertainment Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TBA Entertainment Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TBA Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 16, 2002

2218

TBA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, ~~2002~~2003 AND ~~2001~~2002

					2002			2001
		2003			2002
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	~~Cash and cash equivalents~~	$	2,620,900		$	1,527,800		$	~~2,151,200~~
	Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $378,900 and $398,400, respectively					1,993,800			1,574,300
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $165,600 and $378,900, respectively			3,242,200			1,993,800
Asset held for sale, net	~~Asset held for sale, net~~		—			548,700			—
Deferred charges and other current assets	~~Deferred charges and other current assets~~		1,882,200			1,105,800			~~2,709,500~~
Total current assets			7,745,300	~~Total current assets~~		5,176,100			~~6,435,000~~
Property and equipment, net			377,000			653,600			~~2,006,100~~
Other assets, net:
Goodwill	~~Goodwill~~		12,295,100			21,706,100			~~25,668,700~~
Other	~~Other~~		238,900			~~603~~272,~~100~~000			~~249,900~~
Net long-term assets of discontinued operations						—			48,000
Total assets		$	20,656,300		$	27,807,800
				Total assets	$	28,138,900		$	34,407,700
				LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
		Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			$	3,620,700		$	3,905,400
		Deferred revenue				3,560,200			3,335,600
		Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt				1,617,200			1,830,000
		Net short-term liabilities from discontinued operations				211,800			276,200
				Total current liabilities		9,009,900			9,347,200
Long-term debt, net of current portion						3,562,300			7,340,600
				Total liabilities		12,572,200			16,687,800
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) Stockholders’ equity:
		Preferred stock, $.001 par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares, 2,000 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock outstanding, liquidation preference $100				100			100
		Common stock, $.001 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares, 8,857,200
			shares issued, 7,368,100 and 7,362,400 shares outstanding, respectively			8,900			8,900
		Additional paid-in capital				30,577,200			30,589,300
		Retained deficit				(8,961,900	)		(6,797,900	)
		Less treasury stock, at cost, 1,489,200 and 1,494,800 shares, respectively				(6,057,600	)		(6,080,500	)
				Total stockholders’ equity		15,566,700			17,719,900
				Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	28,138,900		$	34,407,700

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


	2003			2002
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	4,008,500		$	3,289,600
Deferred revenue		5,366,800			3,560,200
Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt		2,105,500			1,617,200
Net short-term liabilities from discontinued operations		211,800			211,800

Total current liabilities		11,692,600			8,678,800
Long-term debt, net of current portion		3,069,500			3,562,300

Total liabilities		14,762,100			12,241,100

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares, 2,000 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock outstanding, liquidation preference $100		100			100
Common stock, $.001 par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares, 8,857,200 shares issued, 7,375,400 and 7,368,100 shares outstanding, respectively		8,900			8,900
Additional paid-in capital		30,688,300			30,577,200
Retained deficit		(18,775,500	)		(8,961,900	)
Less treasury stock, at cost, 1,481,800 and 1,489,200 shares, respectively		(6,027,600	)		(6,057,600	)

Total stockholders’ equity		5,894,200			15,566,700

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	20,656,300		$	27,807,800

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.

2319

TBA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,			~~FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,~~
					2002				2001				2000
		2003				2002				2001
Revenues		$	47,932,200		$	~~49,131,800~~$	49,131,800		$	~~60,404,800~~$	60,404,800		$	~~78,540,300~~
Costs related to revenues			32,977,500			~~33,010,100~~	33,010,100			~~40,999,200~~	40,999,200			~~54,971,900~~
Gross profit margin			~~Gross profit margin~~14,954,700			~~16,121,700~~	16,121,700			~~19,405,600~~	19,405,600			~~23,568,400~~
Selling, general and administrative expenses			13,623,200			~~16,491,000~~	16,491,000			~~19,764,100~~	19,764,100			~~19,471,900~~
Depreciation and amortization expense			324,100			~~677,600~~	677,600			~~2,898,100~~	2,898,100			~~2,479,800~~
Other income, net						(478,400	)			(335,200	)			(272,700	)
Goodwill impairment			10,400,200				—				—
Interest expense, net						466,900				548,300				164,000
Other income, net			(88,400	)			(478,400	)			(335,200	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle						(1,035,400	)			(3,469,700	)			1,725,400
Interest expense, net			566,000				466,900				548,300
Benefit (provision) for income taxes						860,000				189,100				(1,531,600	)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			(9,870,400	)			(1,035,400	)			(3,469,700	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle						(175,400	)			(3,280,600	)			193,800
Benefit for income taxes			56,800				860,000				189,100
Discontinued operations (Notes 2 and 7):
Loss from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			(9,813,600	)			(175,400	)			(3,280,600	)
	Loss from operations, net of income tax benefit of $321,900 for 2001, and $731,600 for 2000					—				(1,260,000	)			(92,500	)
Discontinued operations (Notes 2 and 7):
Loss on disposition of discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit of $42,100						—				(2,390,800	)			—
Loss from operations, net of income tax benefit of $321,900			—				—				(1,260,000	)
Loss from discontinued operations						—				(3,650,800	)			(92,500	)
Loss on disposition of discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit of $42,100			—				—				(2,390,800	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle						(1,988,600	)			—				—
Loss from discontinued operations			—				—				(3,650,800	)
Net (loss) income					$	(2,164,000	)		$	(6,931,400	)		$	101,300
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			—				(1,988,600	)			—
(Loss) earnings per common share — basic:
Net loss		$	(9,813,600	)		$	(2,164,000	)		$	(6,931,400	)
	(Loss) income from continuing operations				$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)		$	0.02
Loss per common share - basic:
	Loss from discontinued operations					—				(0.49	)			(0.01	)
Loss from continuing operations		$	(1.33	)		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle					(0.27	)			—				—
Loss from discontinued operations			—				—				(0.49	)
Net (loss) income per common share — basic					$	(0.29	)		$	(0.94	)		$	0.01
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			—				(0.27	)			—
(Loss) earnings per common share — diluted:
Net loss per common share – basic		$	(1.33	)		$	(0.29	)		$	(0.94	)
	(Loss) income from continuing operations				$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)		$	0.02
Loss per common share - diluted:
	Loss from discontinued operations					—				(0.49	)			(0.01	)
Loss from continuing operations		$	(1.33	)		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle					(0.27	)			—				—
Loss from discontinued operations			—				—				(0.49	)
Net (loss) income per common share — diluted					$	(0.29	)		$	(0.94	)		$	0.01
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			—				(0.27	)			—
Net loss per common share – diluted		$	(1.33	)		$	(0.29	)		$	(0.94	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

2420

TBA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 AND ~~2000~~2001

		PREFERRED STOCK	~~PREFERRED STOCK~~						COMMON STOCK	~~COMMON STOCK~~					ADDITIONAL	~~ADDITIONAL~~			~~RETAINED~~			~~TREASURY STOCK~~						~~TOTAL~~
															PAID-IN	~~PAID-IN~~			~~EARNINGS~~									~~STOCKHOLDERS’~~
		SHARES	~~SHARES~~			AMOUNT	~~AMOUNT~~		SHARES	~~SHARES~~		AMOUNT	~~AMOUNT~~		CAPITAL	~~CAPITAL~~			~~(DEFICIT)~~			~~SHARES~~			~~AMOUNT~~			~~EQUITY~~
BALANCES, January 1, 2000			2,200	~~2,600~~		$	$100	~~100~~		8,857,100	~~8,714,300~~	$	$8,900	~~8,700~~	$	$30,600,700	~~29,859,900~~		$	~~32,200~~			~~495,500~~		$	~~(2,062,100~~	)	$	~~27,838,800~~
	Issuance of common stock upon acquisition			—				—			142,400			200			749,800			—			—			—			750,000
Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan			—				—			—			—			(11,400	)
	Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan			—				—			—			—			(9,000	)		—			(15,100	)		62,400			53,400
Repurchase of common stock			—				—			—			—			—
	Repurchase of common stock			—				—			—			—			—			—			869,100			(3,501,000	)		(3,501,000	)
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock			(200	)			—			100			—			—
	Conversion of preferred stock into common stock			(400	)			—			400			—			—			—			—			—			—
Net loss			—				—			—			—			—
	Net income			—				—			—			—			—			101,300			—			—			101,300
BALANCES, December 31, 2001			2,000				100			8,857,200			8,900			30,589,300
BALANCES, December 31, 2000				2,200				100			8,857,100			8,900			30,600,700			133,500			1,349,500			(5,500,700	)		25,242,500
Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan			—				—			—			—			(12,100	)
	Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan			—				—			—			—			(11,400	)		—			(10,000	)		40,800			29,400
Net loss			—				—			—			—			—
	Repurchase of common stock			—				—			—			—			—			—			155,300			(620,600	)		(620,600	)
BALANCES, December 31, 2002			2,000				100			8,857,200			8,900			30,577,200
	Conversion of preferred stock into common stock			(200	)			—			100			—			—			—			—			—			—
Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan			—				—			—			—			(25,300	)
	Net loss			—				—			—			—			—			(6,931,400	)		—			—			(6,931,400	)
Issuance of warrants			—				—			—			—			136,400
BALANCES, December 31, 2001				2,000				100			8,857,200			8,900			30,589,300			(6,797,900	)		1,494,800			(6,080,500	)		17,719,900
Net loss			—				—			—			—			—
	Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan			—				—			—			—			(12,100	)		—			(5,600	)		22,900			10,800
BALANCES, December 31, 2003			2,000			$	100			8,857,200		$	8,900		$	30,688,300
	Net loss			—				—			—			—			—			(2,164,000	)		—			—			(2,164,000	)
BALANCES, December 31, 2002				2,000			$	100			8,857,200		$	8,900		$	30,577,200		$	(8,961,900	)		1,489,200		$	(6,057,600	)	$	15,566,700

~~The~~[Additional ~~accompanying~~columns ~~notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.~~ below]

25[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]


	RETAINED			TREASURY STOCK						TOTAL
	EARNINGS									STOCKHOLDERS’
	(DEFICIT)			SHARES			AMOUNT			EQUITY
BALANCES, January 1, 2000	$	133,500			1,349,500		$	(5,500,700	)	$	25,242,500
Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan		—			(10,000	)		40,800			29,400
Repurchase of common stock		—			155,300			(620,600	)		(620,600	)
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock		—			—			—			—
Net loss		(6,931,400	)		—			—			(6,931,400	)

BALANCES, December 31, 2001		(6,797,900	)		1,494,800			(6,080,500	)		17,719,900
Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan		—			(5,600	)		22,900			10,800
Net loss		(2,164,000	)		—			—			(2,164,000	)

BALANCES, December 31, 2002		(8,961,900	)		1,489,200			(6,057,600	)		15,566,700
Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan		—			(7,400	)		30,000			4,700
Issuance of warrants		—			—			—			136,400
Net loss		(9,813,600	)		—			—			(9,813,600	)

BALANCES, December 31, 2003	$	(18,775,500	)		1,481,800		$	(6,027,600	)	$	5,894,200

TBA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,			~~FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,~~
					2002			2001			2000
		2003			2002			2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net (loss) income				$	(2,164,000	)	$	(6,931,400	)	$	101,300
Net loss		$	(9,813,600	)	$	(2,164,000	)	$	(6,931,400	)
		Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by continuing operations:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by continuing operations:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			—	~~Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle~~		1,988,600			—			—
				Loss from discontinued operations		—			3,650,800			92,500
Impairment loss associated with goodwill			10,400,200			—			—
				Depreciation and amortization		677,600			2,898,100			2,479,800
Loss from discontinued operations			—			—			3,650,800
				Loss on disposal of assets		176,200			300			93,400
Depreciation and amortization			324,100			677,600			2,898,100
				Bad debt expense		250,000			216,000			154,600
Loss on disposal of assets			6,600			176,200			300
				Reversal of interest expense related to reduction of acquisition notes		(591,400	)		—			—
Bad debt expense			70,000			250,000			216,000
				Deferred tax provision		—			—			113,900
Reversal of interest expense related to reduction of acquisition notes			—			(591,400	)		—
				Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable			(1,318,400	~~(Increase~~) ~~decrease in accounts receivable~~		(669,500	)		2,376,600			~~(758,900~~	)
				Decrease (increase) in deferred charges and other current assets		1,721,500			(242,200	)		236,900
(Increase) decrease in deferred charges and other current assets			(1,132,300	)		1,721,500			(242,200	)
				(Increase) decrease in other assets		(373,100	)		(144,000	)		35,900
Decrease (increase) in other assets			244,100			(373,100	)		(144,000	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities			1,537,200	~~Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities~~		298,900			(1,195,800	)		~~1,913,900~~
				Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue		225,700			1,018,300			(2,180,200	)
Increase in deferred revenue			1,750,100			225,700			1,018,300
Net cash provided by continuing operations			2,068,000	~~Net cash provided by continuing operations~~		1,540,500			1,646,700			~~2,283,100~~
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of and investment in businesses, net of cash acquired	~~Acquisition of and investment in businesses, net of cash acquired~~		(762,300	)		(1,585,500	)		(1,435,900	)		~~(4,514,400~~	)
Expenditures for property and equipment	~~Expenditures for property and equipment~~		(51,900	)		(51,600	)		(376,200	)		~~(836,900~~	)
				Net cash used in investing activities		(1,637,100	)		(1,812,100	)		(5,351,300	)
Proceeds from sale of Dallas building and land			503,300			—			—
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net cash used in investing activities			(310,900	)		(1,637,100	)		(1,812,100	)
	Net borrowings on credit lines					612,000			629,500			59,000
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from long-term debt					1,000,000			1,050,000			—
Net (repayments) borrowings on credit lines			(92,500	)		612,000			629,500
	Repayments of long-term debt					(2,134,600	)		(1,882,500	)		(2,179,700	)
Proceeds from borrowings			751,900			1,000,000			1,050,000
	Repurchase of common stock					—			(620,500	)		(3,500,600	)
Repayments of long-term debt			(1,328,000	)		(2,134,600	)		(1,882,500	)
	Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan					10,800			29,400			53,000
Repurchase of common stock			—			—			(620,500	)
			Net cash used in financing activities			(511,800	)		(794,100	)		(5,568,300	)
Issuance of treasury stock for employee stock purchase plan			4,600			10,800			29,400
Net cash used in discontinued operations						(15,000	)		(640,400	)		(460,000	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(664,000	)		(511,800	)		(794,100	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents						(623,400	)		(1,599,900	)		(9,096,500	)
Net cash used in discontinued operations			—			(15,000	)		(640,400	)
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of year						2,151,200			3,751,100			12,847,600
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			1,093,100			(623,400	)		(1,599,900	)
Cash and cash equivalents — end of year					$	1,527,800		$	2,151,200		$	3,751,100
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year			1,527,800			2,151,200			3,751,100
Supplemental cash flow information for continuing operations:
Cash and cash equivalents - end of year		$	2,620,900		$	1,527,800		$	2,151,200
	Cash paid during the year for interest				$	433,200		$	693,600		$	289,800
Supplemental cash flow information for continuing operations:
	Cash paid during the year for income taxes					58,200			344,500			930,000
Cash paid during the year for interest		$	281,000		$	433,200		$	693,600
	Cash refunds received during the year for income taxes					2,114,400			—			—
Cash paid during the year for income taxes			111,900			58,200			344,500
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities for continuing operations:
Cash refunds received during the year for income taxes			195,900			2,114,400			—
	Reversal of goodwill related to reduction of acquisition notes				$	3,518,400		$	—		$	—
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities for continuing operations:
Reversal of goodwill related to reduction of acquisition notes		$	—		$	3,518,400		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

2622

TBA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2002~~2003

1. ~~The~~ Company Description and ~~Business~~Proposed ~~Conditions~~ Sale of Company

TBA Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a diversified communications and entertainment company that produces a broad range of business communications, meeting productions and entertainment services for corporate meetings, develops and produces integrated music marketing programs, manages music industry artists and develops content and entertainment programs for its nationwide network of fairs and festivals. The Company was incorporated in Tennessee in June 1993 and reincorporated in Delaware in September 1997. The Company primarily operates within the United States.

2. ~~Basis~~On April 8, 2004, The Company signed definitive merger documents for the proposed sale of ~~Financial~~100% ~~Presentation~~of the common stock of the Company. See footnote 11 “Subsequent Event – Proposed Sale of the Company” for further discussion.

2. Basis of Financial Presentation Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Discontinued Operations

During the first quarter of ~~2001~~2002, the Company approved a formal plan to discontinue its merchandising operations in order to better focus on its core business as a strategic communications and entertainment company. The disposition of the merchandising operations represents the disposal of a business segment under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 30. Accordingly, this former segment is accounted for as a discontinued operation.

3. Significant Accounting Policies Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when an event occurs. For those projects that provide for multiple events, the contract revenue and costs are apportioned and revenue and profit are recognized as each event occurs. Deferred revenue represents customer deposits on future events. Deferred charges represent Company direct expenditures related to future events.

Costs Related to Revenue

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash in banks and highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents’ carrying amounts approximate fair value. The Company holds its investments in highly qualified financial institutions. The Company maintains an aggregate cash balance of $2,247,800 in excess of federally insured limits at certain financial institutions as of December 31, 2003.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following as of December 31, ~~2002~~2003 and ~~2001~~2002:

	2002			2001
	2003			2002
Land	$	—		$	388,000
Leasehold improvements	$	208,100		$	208,100
Buildings and leasehold improvements		208,100			485,800
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		2,849,000			2,867,300
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		2,867,300			3,402,500
		3,057,100			3,075,400
		3,075,400			4,276,300
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,680,200	)		(2,421,800	)
Less — accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2,421,800	)		(2,270,200	)
Property and equipment, net	$	377,000		$	653,600
Property and equipment, net	$	653,600		$	2,006,100

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method, over the following estimated useful lives:


Building and leasehold improvements		3-25 years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		3-5 years

The Company follows the policy of capitalizing expenditures that materially increase asset lives and charges ordinary maintenance and repairs to operations as incurred. No depreciation or amortization is included in Cost Related to Revenue in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

28 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

~~Table~~ In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which establishes financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets.” The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 beginning with the first quarter of ~~Contents~~2002. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives not be amortized but, instead, tested at least annually for impairment while intangible assets that have finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their respective useful lives. Accordingly, the Company ceased amortization of all goodwill, which is its only intangible asset with an indefinite useful life, on January 1, 2002. The Company has no other identified intangible assets.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company performs its annual review of impairment of goodwill in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 141 by comparing the carrying value of the applicable reporting unit to the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then the Company measures potential impairment by assigning the assets and liabilities of the Company to the reporting unit and comparing the implied value of goodwill to its carrying value. The Company’s goodwill and intangibles are discussed further in Note 4.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities ~~consists~~consist of the following at December 31, ~~2002~~2003 and ~~2001~~2002:

	2002		2001
	2003		2002
Accounts payable	$	1906,~~575,800~~300	$	1,~~672~~575,~~600~~800
Accrued payroll and related taxes		~~801~~978,~~800~~900		1801,~~065,400~~800
Due to sellers of acquired businesses		~~557~~130,~~600~~700		~~585~~226,~~300~~500
Accrued interest expense		2888,~~700~~400		~~510~~28,~~400~~700
Other accrued expenses		~~656~~1,~~800~~904,200		71656,~~700~~800
	$	34,~~620~~008,~~700~~500	$	3,~~905~~289,~~400~~600

Accounting for Stock Options

The Company has adopted the intrinsic value method of accounting for employee stock options as permitted by Statement of Financial ~~Accounting~~ Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123) and discloses the pro forma effect on net loss and loss per share as if the fair value based method had been applied. For equity instruments, including ~~stock~~ stock options, issued to non-employees, the fair value of the equity instruments or the fair value of the consideration received, ~~whichever is more readily determinable, is used to determine the~~ ~~value of services or goods received and the corresponding charge to~~ ~~operations.~~

~~The~~24 ~~following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.~~

	2002			2001
Net loss: as reported	$	(2,164,000	)	$	(6,931,400	)
Add: total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards		(148,400	)		(211,400)
Pro forma net loss	$	(2,312,400	)	$	(7,142,800	)
Loss per share — basic and diluted:
As reported	$	(0.29	)	$	(0.94	)
Pro forma	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.97	)

~~As required~~whichever byis ~~SFAS 123,~~more ~~the~~readily ~~Company~~determinable ~~provides~~is ~~the~~used ~~following disclosure~~to ofdetermine ~~estimated~~the ~~values for these awards. The weighted-average grant-date fair~~ value of ~~options~~services ~~granted~~or ~~during,~~goods ~~2001~~received and ~~2000~~the ~~was estimated~~corresponding charge to ~~be $1~~operations.~~65 and $2.12, respectively. No options were granted in 2002.~~

The ~~fair value~~following oftable ~~each~~illustrated ~~option~~the ~~grant~~effect ~~was estimated~~ on ~~the~~net ~~date~~loss ofand ~~grant~~loss ~~using a~~per ~~Black-Scholes~~share ~~option-pricing~~as ~~model~~if ~~with~~ the ~~following~~Company ~~weighted average~~had ~~assumptions~~applied ~~for~~the ~~2001~~fair ~~and~~value ~~2000,~~recognition ~~respectively;~~provision ~~risk free~~of ~~interest~~SFAS ~~rates of 4~~No.~~64 and 6.19 percent, expected lives of 3 and 5~~ ~~years;~~123 ~~volatility~~to ofstock-based ~~47 percent~~employee ~~and 45 percent and no assumed dividends~~compensation.


	2003			2002
Net loss: as reported	$	(9,813,600	)	$	(2,164,000	)
Deduct: Stock based employee compensation, net of related tax effects, involved in the determination of net loss as reported		—			—
Add: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards		(143,400	)		(143,400	)

Pro forma loss	$	(9,957,000	)	$	(2,307,400	)

Loss per share basic and diluted:
As reported	$	(1.33	)	$	(0.29	)
Pro forma	$	(1.35	)	$	(0.31	)

As required by SFAS 123, the Company provides the following disclosure of estimated values for these awards. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2001 was estimated to be $1.68. No options were granted in 2003 or in 2002.

The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2001: risk free interest rate of 4.64%, expected life of 3 years; volatility of 47% and no assumed dividends.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on enacted tax laws for any temporary differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets, liabilities and carry forwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized (see Note 9).

Concentration of Risk

One of the Company’s customers, SAP, accounted for 21% ~~and 11%~~ of revenues in 2001 ~~and 2000, respectively~~. No customers accounted for more than ten percent of revenues in 2003 and in 2002. The Company ~~did~~had ~~not~~one ~~have~~customer ~~any customers~~ who accounted for more than ten percent of accounts receivable at December 31, ~~2002~~ 2003 and ~~2001~~none at December 31, 2002.

2925

Earnings per Common Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the years ended December 31, ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001:

			2002				2001				2000
		2003				2002				2001
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:
Net (loss) income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			$	(175,400	)		$	(3,280,600	)		$	193,800
Net loss from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		$	(9,813,600	)		$	(175,400	)		$	(3,280,600	)
Weighted average common stock outstanding			7,371,900	~~7,364,700~~			7,364,700	~~7,361,900~~			7,361,900	~~8,055,100~~
Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)		$	0.02
Basic loss per common share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		$	(1.33	)		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:
Net (loss) income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			$	(175,400	)		$	(3,280,600	)		$	193,800
Net loss from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		$	(9,813,600	)		$	(175,400	)		$	( 3,280,600	)
Weighted average common stock outstanding			7,371,900	~~7,364,700~~			7,364,700	~~7,361,900~~			7,361,900	~~8,055,100~~
Additional common stock resulting from dilutive securities:
Additional common stock resulting from dilutive securities
Preferred stock	~~Preferred stock~~		—	—			—	—			—	~~2,200~~
	Stock options and warrants			—				—				12,700
Warrants			—				—				—
Weighted average common stock and dilutive securities outstanding			7,371,900	~~7,364,700~~			7,364,700	~~7,361,900~~			7,361,900	~~8,070,000~~
Diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)		$	0.02
Diluted loss per common share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		$	(1.33	)		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.45	)

Options and warrants to purchase 904,100, 1,354,100, and 1,485,800 ~~and 3,064,700~~ shares of common stock in ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002 and ~~2000~~2001, respectively, were not considered in calculating diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Other Recently Issued Accounting Standards.

In ~~August 2001~~May 2003, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“~~FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. ~~144~~150, ~~(SFAS 144),~~ “Accounting for ~~the~~Certain ~~Impairment~~Instruments orwith ~~Disposal~~Characteristics of ~~Long-Lived~~Both Liabilities ~~Assets~~and Equity,” which ~~addresses~~establishes ~~the financial~~standards ~~accounting~~on ~~and reporting for~~ the ~~impairment of long-lived assets.~~classification ~~This statement supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets~~ and ~~for~~measurement ~~Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of” and the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal~~ of afinancial ~~segment~~instruments ofentered ainto ~~business~~or ofmodified ~~APB~~after ~~Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the~~May ~~Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business~~31, ~~and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions~~2003.” The adoption of SFAS ~~144~~150 in fiscal ~~2002~~2003 did not have a ~~material~~ material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the ~~Company~~ ~~(see Note 11)~~Company.

InCertain ~~June 2001,~~reclassifications ~~the~~have ~~FASB~~been ~~issued Statement~~made ~~No. 143~~to ~~(SFAS~~the ~~No. 143), “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15,~~ 2002. ~~The~~consolidated ~~Statement~~financial ~~requires~~statements ~~entities~~ to ~~record~~conform ~~the~~with ~~fair~~classifications ~~value~~used ~~of a liability for an asset retirement obligation~~ in ~~the period in which it is incurred~~2003. ~~When the~~ ~~liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes a cost by increasing~~ ~~the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the~~ liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement.

~~The adoption of SFAS No~~4. ~~143~~ isGoodwill ~~not~~and ~~expected~~Other toIntangible ~~have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.~~ Assets

InSFAS ~~June~~No. 142 ~~2002,~~requires ~~FASB~~that ~~issued~~goodwill ~~Statement~~and ~~No. 146~~other ~~(SFAS~~intangibles ~~No. 146),~~be ~~“Accounting~~tested annually for ~~Costs~~impairment ~~Associated~~using ~~with~~a ~~Exit~~two-step orprocess. ~~Disposal~~The ~~Activities,”~~first ~~effective~~step ~~for~~is to ~~activities~~determine ~~that~~the ~~are~~fair ~~initiated~~value ~~after~~of ~~December 31,~~the ~~2002,~~reporting ~~with~~unit ~~early~~and ~~application encouraged.~~compare ~~This~~this ~~Statement~~value ~~addresses~~to ~~financial~~its carrying ~~accounting~~value. ~~and~~If ~~reporting~~the ~~for costs~~fair ~~associated~~value ~~with~~exceeds ~~exit~~the orcarrying ~~disposal~~value, ~~activities~~no further work is required and ~~nullifies~~no ~~Emerging Issues~~impairment ~~Task~~loss ~~Force~~would ~~(EITF) Issue~~be Norecognized. ~~94-3,~~ ~~“Liability~~If ~~Recognition~~the ~~for~~carrying ~~Certain~~value ~~Employee~~exceeds ~~Termination~~the ~~Benefits~~fair ~~and~~value, ~~Other~~a ~~Costs~~second tostep ~~Exit~~is anrequired ~~Activity~~to ~~(including~~determine whether ~~Certain~~goodwill ~~Costs~~has ~~Incurred~~been inimpaired aand ~~Restructuring).~~if “so, ~~The~~measure ~~adoption~~the amount of ~~SFAS~~the Noimpairment. ~~146~~ The second step is ~~not~~an ~~expected~~allocation toof ~~have~~the afair ~~material~~value ~~effect~~of onthe reporting unit to all of the ~~Company~~reporting unit’s ~~financial~~assets ~~position~~and liabilities under a hypothetical orpurchase ~~results~~price allocation. At the time of ~~operations.~~adoption, based on the first step evaluation performed to

~~In December 2002, FASB issued Statement No. 148 (SFAS No. 148),~~26 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company is required to follow the prescribed format and provide the additional disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 in its annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 and must also provide the disclosures in its quarterly reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning with the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

4adopt SFAS No. ~~Goodwill~~ 142, using a discounted future cash flow methodology, the Company did not identify any potential goodwill impairment, except for goodwill associated with its fairs and ~~Other~~festivals ~~Intangible~~group. ~~Assets~~The —Company ~~Adoption~~completed the step two process analyses in the third quarter of ~~SFAS~~2002. ~~142~~ Based on the estimated fair market value of the reporting unit, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment loss in the first quarter of 2002 of $1,988,600 associated with the fairs and festivals reporting unit, which has been recorded as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The impairment is the result of the businesses included in the fairs and festivals reporting unit not meeting the earnings expectations set by the Company at the time the businesses were acquired.

InThe ~~July~~Company ~~2001~~has elected to perform its annual impairment testing in November of each year. No further goodwill was identified as impaired in 2002, based on the ~~FASB~~annual ~~issued~~impairment ~~SFAS~~review Noprocess performed as of November 2002. Based on the annual impairment review process preformed at November ~~142~~2003, ~~“Goodwill~~the ~~and~~Company determined ~~Other~~that goodwill for three of its reporting units is impaired. Based ~~Intangible~~on ~~Assets,”~~the ~~which~~estimated ~~establishes~~fair ~~financial~~value ~~accounting~~of ~~and~~the reporting ~~for~~units, the Company reduced the ~~acquired~~recorded goodwill ~~and~~of ~~other~~the ~~intangible~~artist ~~assets~~management, fairs and ~~supersedes~~festivals ~~APB~~and ~~Opinion No.~~corporate 17communications reporting units by $6,152,700, ~~"Intangible~~$3,184,000 ~~Assets~~and $1,063,500, respectively." The ~~Company~~decrease ~~adopted~~in ~~SFAS~~fair ~~No.~~value from November ~~142~~2002 ~~beginning~~was ~~with~~due ~~the~~to a ~~first~~decrease ~~quarter~~in ofthe ~~2002.~~projected ~~SFAS~~future ~~No. 142~~operating ~~requires~~profits ~~that~~and ~~goodwill~~cash ~~and~~flows ~~intangible~~from these ~~assets~~business ~~that~~segments. ~~have~~The ~~indefinite~~reduction ~~useful~~in ~~lives~~Artist ~~not~~Management beis ~~amortized~~due ~~but,~~primarily ~~instead,~~to ~~tested~~reduced atrevenue ~~least~~projections ~~annually~~from ~~for~~its ~~impairment~~artist ~~while~~roster ~~intangible~~and ~~assets~~an ~~that~~increase ~~have~~in the ~~finite~~compensation ~~useful~~structure ~~lives~~paid ~~continue~~ to beretain ~~amortized~~senior ~~over~~executives. ~~their~~The ~~respective~~reduction ~~useful~~in ~~lives.~~Fairs ~~Accordingly,~~and Festivals is due primarily to the ~~Company~~projected ~~ceased~~revenue ~~amortization~~loss from the departure of ~~all~~a ~~goodwill,~~senior ~~which~~account ~~is its~~executive. ~~only~~The ~~intangible~~reduction ~~asset~~in ~~with~~Corporate Communications anis ~~indefinite~~due ~~useful~~primarily ~~life,~~to onreduced ~~January 1,~~revenue ~~2002.~~projections and gross ~~The~~margins ~~Company~~due ~~has~~to noheightened ~~other~~competition ~~identified~~and ~~intangible~~an ~~assets~~increase in the compensation structure paid to retain senior executives.

~~SFAS~~The ~~No. 142~~carrying ~~requires~~amount ~~that~~of goodwill ~~and other intangibles be tested annually~~ for ~~impairment using a two-step process. The first step is to determine~~ the ~~fair~~entertainment ~~value of the reporting unit and compare this value to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value~~marketing, ~~no further work~~artist isand ~~required~~fairs and nofestivals ~~impairment~~client ~~loss~~groups ~~would~~was bealso ~~recognized.~~reduced Ifin the ~~carrying~~third ~~value~~quarter ~~exceeds~~of ~~the~~2002 ~~fair~~by ~~value~~$1,100,000, a$750,000 ~~second step is required to determine whether goodwill has been impaired~~ and if$1,668,400, sorespectively, ~~measure~~to ~~the amount of~~reflect ~~the~~reduction ~~impairment.~~in ~~The~~purchase ~~second~~price ~~step~~associated iswith ancertain ~~allocation~~acquisitions ~~of the fair value of the~~that ~~reporting~~included ~~unit~~previously torecorded ~~all~~contingent ~~of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities under a hypothetical~~ purchase price ~~allocation.~~consideration ~~At the time of adoption, based on the~~(see ~~first~~Note ~~step evaluation performed to adopt SFAS No~~5). ~~142,~~ ~~using~~Goodwill awas ~~discounted cash~~increased ~~flow~~in ~~methodology,~~ the ~~Company~~years ~~did~~ended ~~not identify any potential goodwill impairment~~December 31, ~~except~~ ~~for~~2003 ~~goodwill associated with its fairs~~ and ~~festivals group. The~~ ~~Company completed the step two process analysis in the third quarter of~~ 2002~~. Based~~, onby ~~the estimated fair market value of the reporting unit~~$989,300 ~~the~~and ~~Company recorded a goodwill impairment loss in the first quarter of 2002 of~~ $1,~~988~~389,~~600~~200 ~~associated with the fairs and festivals reporting unit~~respectively, ~~which~~reflecting ~~has~~additional ~~been~~contingent ~~recorded~~purchase asprice apaid ~~cumulative~~associated ~~effect~~with ofcertain ~~change~~prior inyear ~~accounting principle in the~~acquisitions ~~accompanying~~(see ~~Consolidated~~Note ~~Statements of Operations~~6). ~~The impairment is the~~ ~~result of the businesses included in the fairs and festivals reporting unit~~ ~~not meeting the earnings expectations set by the Company at the time the~~ ~~businesses were acquired.~~

The ~~Company~~changes ~~has~~in ~~elected~~the tocarrying ~~perform~~amounts ~~its annual impairment testing in November~~ of ~~each~~goodwill ~~year.~~by ~~Based~~reporting onunit for the ~~first~~years ~~step~~ended ~~evaluation~~December 31, ~~process~~2003 ~~performed as~~and ~~of November~~ 2002, ~~the~~are ~~Company~~as ~~did not identify any further goodwill~~follows: ~~impairment.~~

The carrying amount of goodwill for the entertainment marketing, artist and fairs and festivals client groups was also reduced in the third quarter of 2002 by $1,100,000, $750,000 and $1,668,400, respectively, to reflect reduction in purchase price associated with certain acquisitions that included previously recorded contingent purchase price consideration (see Note 5). Artist client group goodwill and entertainment marketing client group goodwill were increased in the year ended December 31, 2002 by $1,312,200 and $77,000, respectively, reflecting additional contingent purchase price associated with certain prior year acquisitions (see Note 6).


	Balance as of		Annual			Contingent Purchase		Balances as of
	December 31, 2002		Impairment Losses			Price Adjustments		December 31, 2003
Corporate Client Group	$	10,767,900	$	(1,063,500	)	$	—	$	9,704,400
Entertainment Marketing Client Group		1,952,000		—			189,600		2,141,600
Artist Client Group		5,808,600		(6,152,700	)		735,500		391,400
Fairs and Festivals Client Group		3,177,600		(3,184,000	)		64,100		57,700

Total Goodwill	$	21,706,100	$	(10,400,200	)	$	989,200	$	12,295,100

The following table presents the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting unit as of December 31, 2002 and 2001:


	Balance as of		Transitional			Contingent Purchase			Balances as of
	December 31, 2001		Impairment Loss			Price Adjustments			December 31, 2002
Corporate Client Group	$	10,767,900	$	—		$	—		$	10,767,900
Entertainment Marketing Client Group		2,975,000		—			(1,023,000	)		1,952,000
Artist Client Group		5,246,400		—			562,200			5,808,600
Fairs and Festivals Client Group		6,679,400		(1,988,600	)		(1,668,400	)		3,177,600

Total Goodwill	$	25,668,700	$	(1,988,600	)	$	(2,129,200	)	$	21,706,100

		2002		2001
Corporate Client Group		$	10,767,900	$	10,767,900
Entertainment Marketing Client Group			1,952,000		2,975,000
Artist Client Group			5,808,600		5,246,400
Fairs and Festivals Client Group			3,177,600		6,679,400
	Total Goodwill	$	21,706,100	$	25,668,700

The following table reflects the Company’s comparative net income (loss) before goodwill amortization under SFAS No. 142 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000:

		2001			2000
Income (loss) from continuing operations:
	Reported (loss) income from continuing operations	$	(3,280,600	)	$	193,800
	Amortization of goodwill, net of tax		2,551,400			2,151,400
	Adjusted (loss) income from continuing operations	$	(729,000	)	$	2,345,200
Net income (loss):
	Reported net (loss) income	$	(6,931,400	)	$	101,300
	Amortization of goodwill, net of tax		2,551,400			2,151,400
	Adjusted net (loss) income	$	(4,380,000	)	$	2,252,700
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
	Reported net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.94	)	$	0.01
	Amortization of goodwill, net of tax		0.35			0.27
	Adjusted net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.59	)	$	0.28

The following table reflects the Company’s comparative net loss before goodwill amortization under SFAS No. 142 for the year ended December 31, 2001 assuming the non-amortization provision of SFAS No. 142 were applied.


	2001
Loss from continuing operations:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(3,280,600	)
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax		2,551,400

Adjusted loss from continuing operations	$	(729,000	)

Net loss:
Reported net loss	$	(6,931,400	)
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax		2,551,400

Adjusted net loss	$	(4,380,000	)

Basic and diluted earnings per share:
Reported net loss per common share	$	(0.94	)
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax		0.35

Adjusted net loss income per common share	$	(0.59	)

Debt

Long-term debt of the Company consists of the following as of December 31, ~~2002~~ 2003 and ~~2001~~2002:

	2002			2001
	2003			2002
Acquisition notes payable, interest at 8% and 10% due in periodic installments through 2007, $1,531,400 secured by a pledge of the common stock acquired, remaining $913,800 unsecured	$	2,445,200		$	6,479,500
Acquisition notes payable, interest at 8% and 10% due in periodic installments through 2007, $1,189,900 secured by a pledge of the common stock acquired, remaining $666,800 unsecured	$	2,389,900		$	2,445,200
Note payable to a bank, interest at the bank’s prime rate or the 30, 60, or 90 day LIBOR plus 2.00% (4.51% at December 31, 2002), due in monthly installments of $43,750 through April 2003, repaid in February 2003		393,700			962,500
Note payable to a bank, interest at bank’s prime rate or the 30, 60 or 90 day Libor plus 2.75% (4.68% at December 31, 2003)		2,785,100			2,734,300
Revolving credit line, interest at bank’s prime rate or the 30, 60 or 90 day LIBOR plus 2.00% (4.51% at December 31, 2002)		2,340,600			1,728,600
		5,175,000			5,179,500
		5,179,500			9,170,600
Less-current portion		(2,105,500	)		(1,617,200	)
Less-current portion		(1,617,200	)		(1,830,000	)
Long term portion	$	3,069,500		$	3,562,300
	$	3,562,300		$	7,340,600

Future annual maturities of long-term debt consist of the following as of of December 31, ~~2002~~2003:

YEAR ENDING
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
DECEMBER 31,
2004		2,105,500
2003		$	1,617,200
2005		2,746,100
2004			3,169,900
2006		225,700
2005			225,100
2007		97,700
2006			121,100
	$	5,175,000
2007			46,200
		$	5,179,500

Bank Credit ~~Facilities~~ Facility

~~Through~~In October 2001, ~~three of~~ the Company’s ~~subsidiaries had~~ entered into ~~revolving~~a bank credit ~~facilities~~facility, ~~with different banks. Two lines provided~~which provided for maximum borrowings of up to $~~500~~4,050,000. ~~each~~The credit facility was comprised of: (a) a $1,050,000 ~~while~~term ~~the~~loan, ~~third~~repayable ~~provided~~in ~~for~~monthly ~~maximum~~principal ~~borrowings~~installments of $7543,~~000.~~750 ~~Borrowings~~commencing onNovember 1, ~~each~~2001, with an original maturity date of September 30, 2003; and (b) a revolving credit ~~facility~~line ~~accrued~~of ~~interest~~up to at$3,000,000, ~~the~~with ~~respective~~an ~~bank’s~~original ~~prime~~maturity ~~rate,~~date ~~prime~~of +June 30, 2003.~~75%,~~ orThe ~~prime~~credit facility +was 1%initially ~~and~~secured ~~were~~by all accounts receivable (see below) and ~~secured~~bears byinterest, payable monthly, at the ~~business~~Company’s ~~assets~~choice of ~~the~~an ~~respective~~interest ~~subsidiary.~~rate based ~~Each~~upon ofLIBOR or the ~~credit~~ ~~facilities~~bank’s ~~was~~prime ~~repaid~~rate, inplus ~~October~~an ~~2001~~incremental percentage margin, ~~with~~as ~~proceeds~~defined ~~from~~in athe ~~new~~loan ~~bank credit facility~~agreement.

InAt ~~October~~December 31, 2001, the Company ~~entered~~was ~~into~~not ain ~~bank~~compliance ~~credit~~with ~~facility, which~~certain ~~provided~~required ~~for~~financial ~~maximum borrowings of up to $4~~ratios,~~050,000.~~ ~~The~~specifically ~~credit facility was comprised of: (~~a~~) a~~ ~~$1,050,000~~debt/EBITDA ~~term loan~~ratio, ~~repayable~~a infixed ~~monthly principal~~charge ~~installments~~ratio ~~of $43,750 commencing November 1, 2001, with an original maturity date of September 30, 2003;~~ and ~~(b)~~ a ~~revolving~~minimum ~~credit~~net ~~line~~worth ofratio. upPursuant to ~~$3,000,000,~~ ~~with~~ an ~~original maturity date of June~~April ~~30, 2003. The credit~~2002 ~~facility~~restructuring ~~was~~agreement ~~initially secured by all accounts receivable~~ (~~see~~“2002 ~~below~~Restructuring”) ~~and bears~~with ~~interest,~~the ~~payable monthly~~bank, at the Company’s ~~choice of an interest rate~~was ~~based~~granted ~~upon~~a ~~LIBOR~~temporary orwaiver of the ~~bank’s~~financial ~~prime~~covenant ~~rate,~~events ~~plus~~of ~~an incremental percentage~~default ~~margin,~~provisions asunder ~~defined in~~ the original loan agreement. ~~Upon~~and the ~~October~~bank’s ~~2001~~forbearance ~~closing of~~from ~~the~~exercising ~~facility~~its available remedies, ~~the~~which ~~Company~~extended ~~borrowed~~through $January 2,~~778,600~~ ~~($1,050,000~~2003. ~~under the term loan~~In ~~and $1~~addition,~~728,600~~ ~~under~~new ~~the~~financial ~~revolving~~covenants ~~credit line). The term loan proceeds~~ were ~~used~~ toestablished ~~refinance~~and the ~~remaining principal obligations on the~~ Company’s ~~note~~granted ~~payable~~the ~~to a~~ bank ~~and~~additional ~~mortgage~~security ~~payable~~for tothe aentire restructured bank, ~~which~~credit ~~were outstanding in~~facility ~~October~~in ~~2001. Of~~ the ~~revolving~~form ~~credit~~of ~~line~~a ~~proceeds,~~pledge ~~$963,000~~of ~~was~~the ~~used~~shares ~~to repay~~of ~~all~~certain ~~principal~~of ~~and interest due under~~ the Company’s ~~three revolving~~ ~~lines~~subsidiaries ofand ~~credit,~~a ~~with~~first ~~the~~lien ~~remaining~~deed ~~$765,600~~of ~~retained~~trust ason ~~working capital. In January 2002,~~ the Company’s ~~borrowed~~land ~~the remaining $1,271,400 balance of the~~and ~~revolving~~building ~~credit~~located ~~line.~~in ~~At December 31~~Dallas, ~~2002~~Texas, ~~$2,340,600 of the revolving line of credit was outstanding, of~~ which ~~$92,500~~ was ~~classified~~sold ~~under notes~~in ~~payable and current portion of long-term debt.~~

~~The Company was not in compliance with certain required financial~~28 ratios, specifically a debt/EBITDA ratio, a fixed charge ratio and a minimum net worth ratio, as of December 31, 2001. Pursuant to an April 2002 restructuring agreement with the bank, the Company was granted a temporary waiver of the financial covenant events of default provisions under the original loan agreement and the bank’s forbearance from exercising its available remedies, which extended through January 2, 2003. In addition, new financial covenants were established and the Company granted the bank additional security for the entire restructured bank credit facility in the form of a pledge of the shares of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and a first lien deed

~~of trust on the Company’s land and building located in Dallas, Texas, which was sold in~~ February 2003 with the bank’s consent ~~(see Note 11)~~. The maturity date for both the term loan and revolving credit line was extended to April 30, 2003.

The bank also agreed to provide the Company $500,000 of additional financing (“New Bank Loan”). The New Bank Loan was conditioned upon the funding of a second loan of $500,000 (“Affiliate Loan”) from an entity controlled by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“Heritage”). The New Bank Loan and the Affiliate Loan were repaid in June 2002, upon receipt of the Company’s federal income tax refund. In addition, the Company repaid $659,400 on the revolving credit line with proceeds from the Company’s federal income tax refund.

~~Although~~ At ~~the~~December 31, ~~Company has maintained its sales improvement efforts~~2002, the Company was not in ~~technical~~compliance ~~noncompliance~~ with the revised ~~financial~~ financial covenants under the ~~restructured~~2002 ~~bank~~Restructuring. ~~credit facility as of December 31~~Accordingly, ~~2002. In~~in February 2003, the bank required the Company to use the proceeds from the sale of its Dallas facility ~~(see Note 11)~~, to repay the outstanding balance of the term loan ($393,700) and a portion of the revolving credit line ($92,500). After this repayment, there was $2,248,000 outstanding under the revolving credit line. In April 2003, the Company and the bank negotiated a further restructuring of the bank credit facility (“2003 Restructuring”). Pursuant to the 2003 Restructuring, the Company was granted a new waiver of the financial covenant events of default and the bank’s continued ~~forebearance~~forbearance from exercising its ~~available~~ available remedies, which ~~now~~extended ~~extends~~ through January 1, 2004. In addition, the Company was granted the right to re-borrow up to $750,000 under the revolving credit line through May 31, 2003, for the purpose of making scheduled principal and interest payments and additional earn-out payments under the ~~acquisition~~ acquisition notes as well as for working capital purposes. ~~Subsequent~~Upon toborrowing ~~May 31~~the $750,000 in May 2003, the ~~then~~ outstanding balance of the bank revolving credit line ~~will~~of $3,000,000 bewas converted to a term loan (“2003 Term Loan”). ~~and~~The ~~the~~ Company ~~will be~~ was required to make seven equal monthly principal payments of $107,400 from June 30, 2003 through December 31, 2003~~. The total amount to be repaid will equal the greater of the amount re-borrowed through May 31~~, ~~2003 or that amount which will cause the Company to be in compliance~~ with ~~the~~all ~~financial covenants contained in the October 2001 credit agreement. Interest will continue to be paid monthly. All~~ remaining amounts outstanding ~~under the 2003 Term Loan will be~~ due April 30, 2004. The 2003 Restructuring provided for new financial covenants and reporting requirements and included provisions for an accelerated maturity date upon the occurrence of certain events including, among other things, an Event of Default (as defined) or the sale or change of control of a material amount of the Company’s assets. In consideration for entering into the 2003 Restructuring and for providing the first $500,000 of re-borrowings, the Company ~~will pay the bank a fee of $40,000, payable $20,000 in August and October of 2003, and~~ issued 177,645 warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. IfIn consideration ~~the~~for ~~2003~~providing ~~Term~~the ~~Loan~~remaining is$250,000 ~~repaid~~of onre-borrowings, ~~or before~~the ~~December 31~~Company issued 125,000 ~~2003~~warrants ~~and~~to ~~there~~purchase ~~has~~shares ~~been~~of nocommon ~~sale~~stock of the ~~Company~~ ~~within~~Company ~~the~~at ~~six~~an ~~month~~exercise ~~period~~price ~~prior~~of to$0.01 ~~repayment,~~per ~~the~~share. ~~bank~~The ~~will return to the~~ Company ~~the~~valued ~~lessor of (i)~~ the ~~unexercised warrants on~~ ~~such date and (ii) 88~~302,~~822~~645 warrants. Ifat ~~the Company re-borrows the remaining~~ $~~250~~136,~~000~~400 ~~available~~using ~~through May 31, 2003,~~ the ~~Company will~~Black-Scholes ~~issue~~Model ~~additional warrants to the bank to purchase common stock~~ of ~~the~~valuation, ~~Company~~which atamount ~~the~~was ~~rate~~fully ofamortized ~~one~~to ~~warrant~~interest ~~for~~expense ~~every~~in ~~two dollars borrowed and at an exercise price of $0~~2003.~~01 per share.~~

From June 30, 2003 to October 31, 2003, the Company made only two payments of $107,400 to the bank. In November 2003, March 2004 and April 2004, the bank and the Company negotiated further restructurings of the terms of the 2003 Term Loan (“2004 Restructuring”), under which the bank has agreed to temporarily forebear from exercising its available remedies resulting from the current payment defaults through January 1, 2005. Pursuant to the 2004 Restructuring, the Company was required to make $75,000 principal payments to the bank on January 31, 2004, February 28, 2004 and March 31, 2004. Beginning June 30, 2004, the Company will be required to make monthly principal payments of $55,000. The Company will be required to make additional principal payments if its operating cash flows exceed certain levels for 2004. Interest continues to be paid monthly on the outstanding principal balance of the 2003 Term Loan. All remaining principal and accrued but unpaid interest will be due on March 31, 2005. The proposed sale of the Company (see Note 11) would qualify as a termination event under the bank credit agreement and would cause the bank credit facility to become due and payable.

Acquisition Notes

In ~~order~~2002, ~~to better manage~~ the Company’s ~~current cash position, the Company also~~ restructured the payment terms of certain of the Company’s acquisition notes payable~~, totaling $1,378,400~~. The restructured notes ~~provide~~ ~~for~~provided for interest only payments through December 2002 and monthly principal and interest payments beginning January 2003 and continuing through ~~August~~ August 2004. The interest rate on certain of these acquisition notes was increased from 8% to 10%. Beginning in June 2003, in order to better manage the Company’s ongoing cash requirements, the Company elected to forego making some of the restructured principal payments on certain of its acquisition notes payable. As a result, the Company was in default of substantially all its acquisition notes payable at December 31, 2003. In March and April 2004, the Company restructured the terms of these acquisition notes payable. The restructured notes now provide for monthly

~~During the years 1999-2001, the Company acquired four companies pursuant~~29 to agreements whereby the sellers of those businesses would receive payments under promissory notes that were subject to principal reduction should the post-acquisition annual earnings of the acquired businesses be less than designated earnings targets set forth in the notes (see Note 6). At the time of the acquisitions, the Company recorded the promissory notes, totaling $4,225,000, as a liability and corresponding increase in purchase price, as it believed that payment of the promissory notes was probable beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, the Company accrued interest expense on the promissory notes at 8%, calculated from the respective acquisition dates. From the date of acquisition, scheduled principle payments on certain of the promissory notes have been reduced to reflect post-acquisition earn-out adjustments. As a result, payment of the entire principal balance of these promissory notes is no longer considered probable, although it is anticipated that some portion of the principal amount of the notes will, in fact, be paid. Pursuant to SFAS

payments ~~No. 141, “Business Combinations,” contingent consideration should not be recorded as a liability unless payment~~ of ~~the~~principal ~~contingent~~and ~~consideration is determinable beyond a reasonable doubt~~interest. ~~Accordingly,~~Aggregate ~~in September 2002, the Company reduced its recorded debt and corresponding purchase price (see Note 4) by $3,518,400, representing the remaining~~ principal ~~amount~~payment ~~outstanding~~ on ~~the~~ ~~promissory~~acquisition notes ~~issued~~payable infor ~~connection~~2004 ~~with~~will ~~these~~be ~~four~~approximately ~~acquisitions. In addition, the Company reversed~~ $~~591~~1,~~400 of accrued interest payable on these promissory notes~~495, ~~which amounts are reflected first as a reduction of the related Interest Expense recorded in 2002 and then as Other Income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations~~500. Any future payments of principal and interest under these promissory notes, as a result of those businesses achieving their respective target earnings, will be recorded as additional purchase price at the time the payment is determined.

During the years 1999-2001, the Company acquired four companies pursuant to agreements whereby the sellers of those businesses would receive payments under promissory notes that were subject to principal reduction should the post-acquisition annual earnings of the acquired businesses be less than designated earnings targets set forth in the notes (see Note 6). At the time of the acquisitions, the Company recorded the promissory notes, totaling $4,225,000, as a liability and corresponding increase in purchase price, as it believed that payment of the promissory notes was probable beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, the Company accrued interest expense on the promissory notes at 8%, calculated from the respective acquisition dates. From the date of acquisition, scheduled principle payments on certain of the promissory notes have been reduced to reflect post-acquisition earn-out adjustments. As a result, payment of the entire principal balance of these promissory notes is no longer considered probable, although it is anticipated that some portion of the principal amount of the notes will, in fact, be paid. Pursuant to SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” contingent consideration should not be recorded as a liability unless payment of the contingent consideration is determinable beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, in September 2002, the Company reduced its recorded debt and corresponding purchase price (see Note 4) by $3,518,400, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding on the promissory notes issued in connection with these four acquisitions. In addition, the Company reversed $591,400 of accrued interest payable on these promissory notes, which amounts are reflected first as a reduction of the related Interest Expense recorded in 2003 and then as Other Income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Any future payments of principal and interest under these promissory notes, as a result of those businesses achieving their respective target earnings, will be recorded as additional purchase price at the time the payment is determined.

Acquisitions

The Company did not make any new acquisitions in 2003 and 2002. During ~~2001 and~~ ~~2000~~2001, the Company completed the following acquisitions:

				CASH	~~CASH~~
COMPANY		DATE ACQUIRED	~~DATE ACQUIRED~~	CONSIDERATION	~~CONSIDERATION~~
2001 Acquisitions:
	Moore Entertainment, Inc.		February 2001		$	1,100,000
Moore Entertainment, Inc (“Moore”)			February 2001	$	1,100,000
	Alliance Artists, Ltd.		July 2001			400,000
Alliance Artists, Ltd (“Alliance”)			July 2001		400,000
2000 Acquisitions:
	Romeo Entertainment Group, Inc. (“Romeo”)		January 2000			3,475,000
	EJD Concert Services, Inc.		March 2000			540,000

~~The~~Certain ~~two~~of ~~companies~~the ~~acquired~~Company’s inacquisitions ~~2001,~~made ~~along with Romeo and three other companies acquired~~ in ~~years~~ prior toyears ~~2000,~~ provide for additional sales price consideration based on the earnings of those businesses during each respective earn-out period. The following table lists, for each acquired company, the date of acquisition, the applicable earn-out period, the maximum additional sales price consideration available and the total additional sales price consideration, excluding any related interest expense, recorded as of December 31, ~~2002~~2003:

~~Additional Sales~~

Additional Sales

~~Price Consideration~~

Price Consideration

~~Earned as of~~

Earned as of

Company

Date of Acquisition

~~Earn-out Period~~

~~Maximum~~Earn-out Period

~~December 31, 2002~~Maximum

December 31, 2003

Alliance Artists, Ltd. (“Alliance”)

July 2001

~~August 2001 — July 2006~~

$August 2001 – December 2007

~~400,000~~

—$

400,000

68,300

Moore Entertainment, Inc. (“Moore”)

February 2001

~~January 2003 — December 2006~~

January 2003 – December 2006

~~550,000~~

—

550,000

175,600

Romeo Entertainment Group, Inc.

January 2000

~~January 2000 — December 2003~~

January 2000 – December 2003

~~2,025,000~~

~~481,900~~

2,025,000

525,600

Mike Atkins Management Company (“Atkins”)

December 1999

December 1999 — November 2003

700,000

525,000

Mike Atkins Management Company(“Atkins”)

December 1999

December 1999 – November 2003

700,000

TKS Marketing, Inc. (“TKS”)

December 1998

~~December 1998 — November 2003~~

December 1998 – November 2003

~~625,000~~

~~610,900~~

625,000

610,900

Titley Spalding & Associates, LLC (“TS”)

June 1998

~~July 1998 — June 2003~~

July 1998 – June 2003

~~5,755,000~~

~~2,899,400~~

5,755,000

3,112,400

As of December 31, 2003, only the Moore and Alliance acquisitions had continuing earn out provisions. The maximum additional sales price consideration for the Moore~~, Alliance,~~ ~~Romeo~~ and ~~Atkins~~Alliance acquisitions is in the form of promissory notes, each requiring annual payments of principal over the term of the earn-out period, plus 8% interest from the date of acquisition until paid (see Note 5). The amount of the annual principal payment is subject to reduction based on the earnings of those businesses during each respective earn-out period. These reductions in principal payments can be recovered over the remaining term of the earn-out period if the operations of these businesses achieve specified levels of operations. For each company, the applicable principal payment is calculated at the end of each calendar year in the earn-out period, with payment to be made in the following year.

~~For TS and TKS, subsequent to 1998, the additional purchase price was to~~30 be paid 60% in cash and 40% in notes payable in semi-annual installments (April and October) with 8% interest over a 5-year period. Pursuant to the terms of the TS and TKS notes payable, totaling approximately $766,800 as of December 31, 2002, the Company is required to secure these notes payable with a certificate of deposit, letter of credit or such other mutually agreed upon form of cash equivalent. In July 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with the sellers of the TS and TKS businesses, whereby, in recognition that the Company has not satisfied the cash collateral requirement, the additional sales price consideration payable for 2002 and 2003 will be paid 100% in cash to the sellers on a quarterly basis. From July to December of 2002, the Company paid the sellers additional sales

At the January 2001 acquisition date of Moore, the maximum additional sales price consideration ofwas $1,~~000~~100,~~200~~000 ~~under~~and the ~~revised~~earn-out ~~agreement~~period commenced January 2001 and extended through December 2004. In ~~February~~ 2002, the maximum additional sales price consideration was reduced to $550,000 and ~~March~~the earn-out was amended to commence January 2003 and extend through December 2006. The accounting for the above-mentioned acquisitions is in accordance with the purchase method of accounting. The operations of the acquired businesses are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations from their respective acquisition dates. The purchase price, including the additional ~~payments~~sales ofprice ~~$184~~consideration,~~400~~ for each acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the respective acquisition date. Substantially the entire purchase price has been allocated to goodwill, as the net tangible assets of the companies acquired were ~~paid~~not ~~under~~significant at the ~~revised~~ ~~agreement.~~ date of the acquisition (see Note 4)

As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the accrued and unpaid cash portion of the additional sales price consideration payable to the sellers of all these businesses totaled $484,700 and $795,900 respectively, and is included in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities and in Notes Payable and current portion of Long-term Debt on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

At the January 2001 acquisition date of Moore, the maximum additional sales price consideration was $1,100,000 and the earn-out period commenced January 2001 and extended through December 2004. In 2002, the maximum additional sales price consideration was reduced to $550,000 and the earn-out was amended to commence January 2003 and extend through December 2006.

The accounting for the above-mentioned acquisitions is in accordance with the purchase method of accounting. The operations of the acquired businesses are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations from their respective acquisition dates. The purchase price, including the additional sales price consideration, for each acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the respective acquisition date. Substantially the entire purchase price has been allocated to goodwill, as the net tangible assets of the companies acquired were not significant at the date of the acquisition (see Note 4).

Dispositions

During the first quarter of 2001, the Company approved a formal plan to sell its merchandising operations in order to better focus on its core business as a strategic communications and entertainment company. The disposition of the merchandising operations represents the disposal of a business segment under Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 30. Accordingly, this segment is accounted for as a discontinued operation and amounts in the financial statements and related notes for all periods shown have been reclassified to reflect discontinued operations accounting. There were no discontinued operations for ~~2002~~2003.

The following is a summary of the operating results of the discontinued merchandising operations:

	DECEMBER 31,
	DECEMBER 31
	2001			~~2000~~
Revenues	$	3,924,600		$	~~10,491,600~~
Net loss from discontinued operations before income taxes		(4,014,700	)		~~(824,100~~	)
Income tax benefit		410,000			~~731,600~~
Net loss from discontinued operations	$	(3,604,700	)	$	~~(92,500~~	)

The following is a summary of the components of assets and liabilities of the discontinued merchandising operations:

		DECEMBER 31,	~~DECEMBER 31,~~
			2002				2001
		2003				2002
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	~~Cash and cash equivalents~~	$	$86,100	~~147,200~~		$	$147,200	~~37,100~~
Accounts receivable	~~Accounts receivable~~		—	—			—	~~85,500~~
Inventories	~~Inventories~~		—	—			—	~~7,500~~
Other current assets	~~Other current assets~~		—	—			—	~~55,200~~
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	~~Accounts payable and accrued liabilities~~		(297,900	~~(359,000~~)	)		(359,000	~~(461,500~~)	)
Net current liabilities		$	$(211,800	~~(211,800~~)	)	$	$(211,800	~~(276,200~~)	)
Long-term assets:
	Property and equipment, net		$	—			$	48,000
Net long-term assets			$	—			$	48,000

35 8. Stockholders’ Equity Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of $.001 par value preferred stock. The Company has designated 557,100 shares of the authorized preferred stock as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), of which 334,300 shares were previously issued and are non-voting. The shares are convertible into common stock on a one-for-one basis. In 2001, 100 shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2003, 2,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock remain outstanding. Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $0.03 per share and has no preference in payment of dividends.

8. Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of $.001 par value preferred stock. The Company has designated 557,100 shares of the authorized preferred stock as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), of which 334,300 shares were previously issued and are non-voting. The shares are convertible into common stock on a one-for-one basis. In 2001 and 2000, 100 and 400 shares, respectively, of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2002, 2,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock remain outstanding. Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $0.03 per share and has no preference in payment of dividends.

Common Stock Repurchase Program

In August 1998, the board of directors authorized the repurchase, at management’s discretion, of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock until August 1999, which was later extended to December 31, 1999. In 2000, the board of directors increased the number of shares authorized to be purchased to 2,000,000 and extended the stock repurchase program until December 31, 2000. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had repurchased 1,729,900 shares of common stock pursuant to the stock repurchase program for a total consideration of $7,145,700. No common stock repurchases were made in 2002 and 2003. The Company’s repurchases of shares of common stock are recorded as treasury stock and result in a reduction of stockholders’ equity.

Stock Options

In 1995 and 1996, the Company granted 80,000 non-qualified options to key employees and directors of which 40,000 remain outstanding as of December 31, 2002. In 1997, 1998, and 2000 the Company established three stock option plans that provide for the granting of either incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options to key employees, officers and directors of the Company. Under the three plans, the Company may grant a total of 1,400,000 stock options at prices not less than the fair market value on the date of grant, with expiration dates not exceeding ten years. As of December 31, ~~2002~~2003, the Company has 1897,~~314,~~100 outstanding incentive stock options pursuant to to the three plans.

Information relating to stock options is as follows:

		SHARES UNDER	~~SHARES UNDER~~			WEIGHTED-AVERAGE	~~WEIGHTED-AVERAGE~~
		OPTIONS	~~OPTIONS~~			EXERCISE PRICE	~~EXERCISE PRICE~~
Options outstanding at December 31, 1999				805,800				4.22
Options outstanding at December 31, 2000			1,355,800			$	4.28
Cancelled	~~Cancelled~~		(75,000	~~(60,000~~)	)		4.44	~~4.61~~
Granted	~~Granted~~		93,300	~~610,000~~			3.57	~~4.38~~
Options outstanding at December 31, 2000				1,355,800				4.28
Options outstanding at December 31, 2001			1,374,100				4.14
Cancelled	~~Cancelled~~		(20,000	~~(75,000~~)	)		3.85	~~4.44~~
	Granted			93,300				3.57
Options outstanding at December 31, 2002			1,354,100				4.20
Options outstanding at December 31, 2001				1,374,100				4.14
Cancelled			(457,000	)			4.16
	Cancelled			(20,000	)			3.85
Options outstanding at December 31, 2003			897,100				4.23
Options outstanding at December 31, 2002				1,354,100				4.20
Options exercisable at December 31, 2001			1,106,200				4.16
Options exercisable at December 31, 2002			1,197,800	~~1,197,800~~			3.71	~~3.71~~
Options exercisable at December 31, 2001				1,106,200				4.16
Options exercisable at December 31, 2003			821,800				3.88
Options exercisable at December 31, 2000				996,600				4.24

As of December 31, ~~2002~~2003, the exercise price of options outstanding ranged from $2.50 to $5.50 and the weighted average remaining contractual life of the options was 45.3 years.

Income Taxes

The (benefit) provision for income taxes consists of the following:

		FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,	~~FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,~~
			2002				2001				2000
		2003				2002				2001
Current
Federal	~~Federal~~	$	$(168,400	~~(875,800~~)	)	$	$(875,800	~~(886,800~~)	)	$	$(886,800	~~583,200~~)
State	~~State~~		111,600	~~15,800~~			15,800	~~(156,500~~	)		(156,500	~~102,900~~)
Deferred
Federal	~~Federal~~		—	—			—	~~416,800~~			416,800	~~96,800~~
State	~~State~~		—	—			—	~~73,500~~			73,500	~~17,100~~
Total		$	$(56,800	~~(860,000~~)	)	$	$(860,000	~~(553,000~~)	)	$	$(553,000	~~800,000~~)

A reconciliation of the difference between the statutory federal tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:

	FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
	2002			2001			2000
	2003			2002			2001
Income taxes at statutory federal rate	$	(13,~~028~~342,~~000~~100	)	$	(21,~~544~~028,~~700~~000	)	$	~~306~~(2,~~400~~544,700	)
State income tax, net of federal tax benefit		(~~192~~625,~~000~~200	)		(~~449~~192,000	)		52(449,~~600~~000	)
Non-deductible goodwill amortization		~~802~~52,~~600~~100			~~511~~802,~~900~~600			~~429~~511,~~800~~900
Change in valuation allowance		(421,000	)		1,881,400			—
Change in impairment valuation allowance		3,752,800			(421,000	)		1,881,400
Other		~~(21~~105,600	)		47(21,~~400~~600	)		1147,~~200~~400
Income tax provision	$	(~~860~~56,~~000~~800	)	$	(~~553~~860,000	)	$	~~800~~(553,000	)

The Company has federal and state operating loss ~~carryforwards~~carry offorwards ~~approximately~~of approximately $13,~~828~~189,000 and $79,~~177~~240,000, respectively. These net operating losses expire from ~~2004~~2005 to ~~2022~~2023. These carryforwards of federal and state net operating losses, may be available, in part, to reduce future taxable income. However, due to potential adjustments to the net operating loss carry forwards as provided by the Internal Revenue Code with respect to future ownership changes, future availability of the tax benefits is not assured.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Realization of the future tax benefits related to the deferred tax assets is dependent on many factors, including the Company’s ability to generate taxable income within the net operating loss ~~carryforward~~carry forward period. ~~Management~~ Management has considered these factors in reaching its conclusion as to the ~~valuation~~ valuation allowance for financial reporting purposes. The income tax effect of of temporary differences comprising the deferred tax assets and liabilities as as of December 31, ~~2002~~2003 and ~~2001~~2002 are as follows:

			2002				2001
		2003				2002
Deferred tax assets:
	Net operating loss carryforwards		$	1,042,000			$	1,413,200
Net operating loss carry forwards		$	1,161,800			$	1,042,000
Accrued payroll related costs	~~Accrued payroll related costs~~		72,000	~~182,600~~			182,600	~~194,400~~
Accelerated depreciation for tax	~~Accelerated depreciation for tax~~		215,200	~~(6,100~~	)		(6,100	~~115,400~~)
	Other			181,200				198,400
Goodwill			4,140,300				—
				1,399,700				1,921,400
Other			(336,100	)			181,200
Deferred tax liabilities:
			5,253,200				1,399,700
	Accrued professional fees			100,700				—
Deferred tax liabilities:
Net deferred tax asset				1,500,400				1,921,400
Accrued professional fees			—				100,700
Valuation allowance				(1,500,400	)			(1,921,400	)
Net deferred tax asset			5,253,700				1,500,400
			$	—			$	—
Valuation allowance			(5,253,200	)			(1,500,400	)
		$	—			$	—

37 10. Commitments and Contingencies Operating Leases

The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating lease agreements expiring in various years through 2007. Commitments for operating leases:


2004	$	740,900
2005		476,700
2006		310,500
2007		43,200
2008		2,900
Thereafter		2,200

	$	1,576,400

The Company incurred rent expense of approximately $1,365,800, $1,079,500 and $956,800 and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating lease agreements expiring in various years through 2006.

Commitments for operating leases:

2003	$	669,400
2004		545,500
2005		266,700
2006		169,600
	$	1,651,200

The Company incurred rent expense of approximately $1,365,800, $1,079,500 and $956,800 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Contingencies

The Company, from time to time, is a party to legal proceedings incidental to its business. Management believes that there are no proceedings, ~~including the following two proceedings,~~ that could have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations ~~pending~~other atthan ~~this~~as ~~time~~discussed below.

InAs ~~November~~of ~~2001~~December 31, 2003, the Company was in default on substantially all of its bank debt and acquisition notes payable (see Note 5). On March 18, 2004, a Verified Complaint was filed inagainst the ~~Marion~~Company ~~County~~by ~~Superior Court~~Richard S. Smith in the ~~State~~Circuit Court of ~~Indiana~~Cook ~~against~~County, ~~TBA~~Illinois, ~~alleging~~seeking ~~breach~~payment ofin ~~contract~~full ~~arising~~under ~~with~~one ~~respect~~of toacquisition ~~the~~notes ~~tax~~payable ~~indemnification~~by ~~provisions~~the ~~contained~~Company. inThe ~~the~~suit ~~Stock~~seeks payment in ~~Purchase~~full ~~Agreement~~of ~~related~~all to$566,751 ~~the~~of ~~purchase~~outstanding byprincipal ~~TBA~~amount ofdue aunder ~~merchandising~~the ~~company~~note, plus ~~now~~all ~~classified~~accrued asbut ~~discontinued~~unpaid ~~operations.~~interest ~~The~~and ~~issue~~all iscosts for enforcing the ~~amount~~note, including ifattorneys’ ~~any~~fees and expenses. On March 29, ~~that~~2004, isthe ~~due~~plaintiff ~~pursuant~~agreed to a modification to the ~~indemnification~~payment ~~provision.~~terms Inof ~~January~~the ~~2003,~~acquisition ~~TBA~~note payable and ~~the plaintiff~~an ~~agreed~~extension toof ~~arbitrate~~the ~~this~~due ~~dispute~~date until March 31, ~~which~~2005. ~~arbitration~~In isaddition, ~~tentatively~~the ~~scheduled~~plaintiff ~~for~~agreed ~~May~~to ~~2003.~~withdraw ~~Management~~the ~~does~~Verified ~~not~~Complaint, ~~believe~~without ~~that~~prejudice, at the ~~outcome~~request of ~~this dispute~~the ~~will~~entity ~~have~~proposing ato ~~material~~acquire ~~adverse~~the ~~effect~~Company on(see Note 11). ~~the~~As ~~consolidated~~of ~~financial~~April 14, ~~condition~~2004, orsuch ~~results~~request ofhas ~~operations~~not ofbeen made and the ~~Company~~Verified Complaint had not been withdrawn.

~~In January 2003, a Petition was filed in the Civil Court of New York against TBA alleging breach of contract arising from a real estate lease for office space in New York City~~11. InSubsequent ~~2002,~~Event ~~TBA~~– ~~terminated~~Proposed ~~its~~Sale ~~operations in New York and ceased paying rent in July 2002. TBA continued to try to sublease this office space throughout the remainder~~ of ~~2002. The Petition seeks unpaid rent through~~ the ~~date of the filing, in the amount of approximately $140,000. The~~ Company is in negotiations with the plaintiff in an effort to negotiate a buy-out of the remaining lease obligation. Management believes that it has adequately reserved for this obligation as of December 31, 2002.

~~11.~~ ~~Asset~~On ~~Held~~April 8, 2004, the Company signed definitive merger documents for ~~Sale~~the proposed sale of 100% of the capital stock of the Company in an all cash transaction. The proposed sale of the Company, which requires shareholder approval, is likely to close in the second quarter of 2004. The proposed terms of the transaction provide for cash consideration in the amount of $6,150,000, which, after deductions of certain transaction expenses, results in net consolidation of $0.67 per share of common stock and $0.70 per share of preferred stock, subject to downward adjustment based on certain of the Company’s other expenses incurred in connection with the transaction. It is anticipated that the transaction will result in the Company no longer being a publicly traded entity.

In the third quarter of 2002, the Company decided to close its Dallas office and to sell the land and building in which the Dallas office operated. The land and building sold in February 2003 with the bank’s consent and the net proceeds totaling $503,300 were used to repay the outstanding term loan from the bank and a portion of the revolving credit line (see Note 5).

12.

Business Segment and Geographic Information

Segment information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” The Company classifies its continuing operations according to four major client segments within the entertainment services industry: corporate clients, entertainment marketing clients, artist clients and fairs & festivals clients. For corporate clients, the Company creates innovative business communications programs delivered via a broad range of business communications, meeting production, entertainment and event production services. For entertainment marketing clients, the Company develops and executes integrated entertainment marketing and special event initiatives including music tours, television broadcasts and syndicated radio specials. For artist clients, the Company manages the negotiation of recording, touring, merchandising and performance contracts, and the development of long-term career strategies for music industry artists. For fairs and festivals clients, the Company develops content and entertainment programs for its nationwide network of fairs and festivals. Substantially all revenues and long-lived assets of the Company for ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002, and ~~2000~~2001 were derived from United States based companies.

The Company does not internally report separate identifiable assets by client group. The Company evaluates performance of each segment based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is EBITDA, including other income. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization and goodwill impairment cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and reversal of prior years’ accrued interest. Unaudited summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments (and excluding discontinued operations discussed in Note 7) is shown in the following table for ~~2002~~2003, ~~2001~~2002, and ~~2000~~2001.

				ENTERTAINMENT						FAIRS &
	CORPORATE			MARKETING			ARTIST			FESTIVALS
	CLIENTS			CLIENTS			CLIENTS			CLIENTS			CORPORATE			TOTAL
2002:
Revenues	$	29,967		$	4,116		$	4,673		$	10,376		$	—		$	49,132
EBITDA, including equity in earnings of joint ventures	$	361		$	(554	)	$	1,546		$	684		$	(2,293	)	$	(256	)
Reversal of accrued interest included in other income		—			—			—			—			365			365
Net depreciation and amortization		(442	)		(49	)		(46	)		(20	)		(120	)		(677	)
Net interest income (expense)		3			3			—			1			(474	)		(467	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	(78	)	$	(600	)	$	1,500		$	665		$	(2,522	)	$	(1,035	)
2001:
Revenues	$	42,194		$	4,871		$	3,660		$	9,680		$	—		$	60,405
EBITDA, including equity in earnings of joint ventures	$	2,893		$	(564	)	$	693		$	466		$	(3,512	)	$	(24	)
Depreciation and amortization		(1,137	)		(357	)		(642	)		(422	)		(340	)		(2,898	)
Net interest income (expense)		5			24			(4	)		(18	)		(555	)		(548	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	1,761		$	(897	)	$	47		$	26		$	(4,407	)	$	(3,470	)
2000:
Revenues	$	55,250		$	11,393		$	3,513		$	8,384		$	—		$	78,540
EBITDA, including equity in earnings of joint ventures	$	6,289		$	(978	)	$	1,500		$	992		$	(3,434	)	$	4,369
Depreciation and amortization		(1,207	)		(153	)		(548	)		(405	)		(167	)		(2,480	)
Net interest income (expense)		226			164			(16	)		(6	)		(532	)		(164	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before Income taxes	$	5,308		$	(967	)	$	936		$	581		$	(4,133	)	$	1,725


				ENTERTAINMENT						FAIRS &
	CORPORATE			MARKETING			ARTIST			FESTIVALS
	CLIENTS			CLIENTS			CLIENTS			CLIENTS			CORPORATE			TOTAL
2003:
Revenues	$	30,389		$	2,987		$	4,635		$	9,922		$	—		$	47,933

EBITDA, including equity in earnings of joint ventures	$	2,370		$	(159	)	$	604		$	661		$	(2,056	)	$	1,420
Goodwill impairment		(1,063	)		—			(6,153	)		(3,184	)		—			(10,400	)
Depreciation and amortization		(124	)		(29	)		(34	)		(9	)		(128	)		(324	)
Net interest income (expense)		3			—			(1	)		1			(569	)		(566	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	1,186		$	(188	)	$	(5,584	)	$	(2,531	)	$	(2,753	)	$	(9,870	)

2002:
Revenues	$	29,967		$	4,116		$	4,673		$	10,376		$	—		$	49,132

EBITDA, including equity in earnings of joint ventures	$	361		$	(554	)	$	1,546		$	684		$	(2,293	)	$	(256	)
Reversal of accrued interest included in other income		—			—			—			—			365			365
Depreciation and amortization		(442	)		(49	)		(46	)		(20	)		(120	)		(677	)
Net interest income (expense)		(3	)		3			—			1			(474	)		(467	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	(78	)	$	(600	)	$	1,500		$	665		$	(2,522	)	$	(1,035	)

2001:
Revenues	$	42,194		$	4,871		$	3,660		$	9,680		$	—		$	60,405

EBITDA, including equity in earnings of joint ventures		(2,893	)		(564	)		693			466			(3,512	)		(24	)
Depreciation and amortization		(1,137	)		(357	)		(642	)		(422	)		(340	)		(2,898	)
Net interest income (expense)		5			24			(4	)		(18	)		(555	)		(548	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	1,761		$	(897	)	$	47		$	26		$	(4,407	)	$	(3,470	)

13.

Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

Summary data relating to the results of continuing operations for each quarter of the years ended December 31, ~~2002~~2003 and ~~2001~~2002 follows:

		First		~~First~~		Second		~~Second~~		Third		~~Third~~		Fourth		~~Fourth~~		Total		~~Total~~
		Quarter		~~Quarter~~		Quarter		~~Quarter~~		Quarter		~~Quarter~~		Quarter		~~Quarter~~		Year		~~Year~~
				(in thousands - except per share amounts)
						(in thousands – except per share amounts)
December 31, 2002:
December 31, 2003
Revenues	~~Revenues~~	$	8,030	$	~~7,971~~	$	10,342	$	~~12,844~~	$	15,355	$	~~18,923~~	$	14,205	$	~~9,394~~	$	47,932	$	~~49,132~~
Gross profit margin	~~Gross profit margin~~		2,625		~~2,799~~		3,175		~~4,774~~		4,956		~~6,019~~		4,199		~~2,530~~		14,955		~~16,122~~
	Net (loss) income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle				(1,333	)			243				1,626				(711	)			(175	)
Net (loss) income			(916	)			230				972				(10,100	)			(9,814	)
	Earnings from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle per share:
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic		~~Basic~~	(0.12	)	~~(0.18~~	)	(0.03	)	~~0.03~~		0.13		~~0.22~~		(1.31	)	~~(0.10~~	)	(1.33	)	~~(0.02~~	)
Diluted		~~Diluted~~	(0.12	)	~~(0.18~~	)	0.03		~~0.03~~		0.13		~~0.22~~		(1.31	)	~~(0.10~~	)	(1.33	)	~~(0.02~~	)
	Net (loss) income				(3,321	)			243				1,626				(712	)			(2,164	)
December 31, 2002:
	Earnings per share:
Revenues		$	7,971			$	12,844			$	18,923			$	9,394			$	49,132
		Basic			(0.45	)			0.03				0.22				(0.10	)			(0.29	)
Gross profit margin			2,799				4,774				6,019				2,530				16,122
		Diluted			(0.45	)			0.03				0.22				(0.10	)			(0.29	)
Net (loss) income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			(1,333	)			243				1,626				(711	)			(175	)
December 31, 2001:
Earnings before cumulative
	Revenues			$	13,900			$	22,330			$	15,883			$	8,292			$	60,405
Effect of change in accounting principle per share
	Gross profit margin				4,443				7,632				4,359				2,972				19,406
Basic			(0.18	)			0.03				0.22				(0.10	)			(0.02	)
	Net (loss) income from continuing operations				(1,101	)			644				71				(2,941	)			(3,327	)
Diluted			(0.18	)			0.03				0.22				(0.10	)			(0.02	)
	Earnings from continuing operations per share:
Net (loss) income			(3,521	)			243				1,626				(1,119	)			(2,164	)
		Basic			(0.15	)			0.09				0.01				(0.40	)			(0.45	)
Earnings (loss) per share:
		Diluted			(0.15	)			0.09				0.01				(0.40	)			(0.45	)
Basic			(0.45	)			0.03				0.22				(0.10	)			(0.29	)
	Net (loss) income				(1,241	)			168				(197	)			(5,661	)			(6,931	)
Diluted			(0.45	)			0.03				0.22				(0.10	)			(0.29	)
	Earnings per share:
		Basic			(0.17	)			0.02				(0.03	)			(0.77	)			(0.94	)
		Diluted			(0.17	)			0.02				(0.03	)			(0.77	)			(0.94	)

~~Beginning in the~~35 first quarter of 2002, the Company ceased amortizing goodwill, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Goodwill amortization recognized in the four quarters of 2001 was $489,600, $547,500, $528,800 and $539,800, respectively.

During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment loss of $10,400,200 pursuant to its annual test for goodwill impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142.

During the first quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment loss of $1,988,600 upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This loss was recorded as a Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle.

During the third quarter of 2002, in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”, the Company reduced its recorded debt and corresponding purchase price (goodwill) by $3,518,400 related to contingent purchase price consideration for certain acquisitions made in prior years. In addition, the Company reversed $591,400 of accrued interest payable previously recorded, with $226,600 reflected as a reduction of Interest Expense recorded in 2002, and the remaining $364,800 reflected in Other Income.

During the third quarter of 2002, the Company increased its allowance for doubtful accounts by $250,000 to reflect an account receivable from a customer in bankruptcy proceedings.

During the third quarter of 2002, the Company expensed $280,000 of costs associated with the termination of certain transactional discussions.

During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a $481,600 accrual for termination costs associated with closed offices.

~~During the third~~36 quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a reversal of approximately $800,000 of certain incentive compensation costs recorded in the first and second quarters of 2001. This was due to expense reductions implemented in the third quarter of 2001 in response to the reduction in revenues resulting from the September 11 terrorist attacks and global economic slowdown.

DuringTable the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a loss of $2,390,400, net of income tax benefit, to reflect the write-down of its investment in the merchandising operations, which were discontinued in the first quarter of 2001. Contents

~~As required~~SCHEDULE byII ~~SFAS 123,~~— ~~the~~VALUATION ~~Company~~AND ~~provides~~QUALIFYING ~~the following~~ACCOUNTS ~~disclosure of estimated values for these awards. The weighted-average~~ ~~grant-date fair value of options granted during, 2001 and 2000 was~~ ~~estimated to be $1.66 and $2.12, respectively. No options were~~ ~~granted in 2002.~~

~~The~~YEARS ~~fair value~~ENDED ofDECEMBER ~~each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2001 and 2000~~31, ~~respectively~~2003, ~~risk free~~2002 ~~interest~~AND ~~rates of 4.64 and 6.19 percent, expected lives of 3 and~~2001 ~~5 years; volatility of 47 percent and 45 percent and no assumed~~ ~~dividends.~~


			Additions
	Balance at		Charged to						Balance at
	Beginning of		Costs &		Charges to Other				End of
Description	Period		Expenditures		Accounts	Deductions			Period
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Year Ended December 31, 2003	$	398,400		—			213,200	*	$	165,600
Year Ended December 31, 2002		378,900		250,000			269,500	*		378,900
Year Ended December 31, 2001		182,400		282,700			66,700	*		398,400

*Write-off of uncollectible accounts, net of recoveries.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On August 6, 2002, the Company dismissed its independent certified public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP (the “Former Accountants”). The decision to change accountants was recommended and approved by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

During the ~~Company’s~~period ~~two~~of ~~most~~January 1, ~~recent~~2002 ~~fiscal years and~~ through August 6, 2002, there were no disagreements with the Former Accountants on any matter of accounting principle or practice, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope of procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to their satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement. ~~None~~The ~~of the~~ Former Accountant’s ~~reports~~ report on the Company’s financial statements for the ~~Company’s~~period ~~two~~of ~~most~~January 1, ~~recent~~2002 ~~fiscal years and~~ through August 6, 2002 ~~contained~~did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion or qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

On August 16, 2002, the Company engaged BDO Seidman, LLP (“BDO”), as its independent certified public accountants. During the ~~two (2) most recent fiscal years and the~~ period of January 1, 2002 through August 16, 2002, neither the Company (nor anyone on behalf of the Company) consulted BDO regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed;, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, or any matter that was the subject of a disagreement or a reportable event; and such matters were not an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision to engage BDO as the Company’s independent certified public accountants.

The Company has not been able to obtain Arthur Andersen’s consent to incorporate by reference the audited financial statements for the fiscal ~~years~~year ended December 31, 2001 ~~and 2000~~ into the Company’s existing registration statements.

40 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company has designed and maintains disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. These controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow them to make timely decisions about required disclosure.

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a – 15 (b). Based on that evaluation, which was conducted at the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries that is required to be included in its periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial Officer’s most recent evaluation.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the directors and executive officers of the Company:

Name	Age		Position	Held Since
Thomas J. Weaver III		4546	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer		1993
Frank Bumstead		6162	Director		1993
Charles Flood		5859	Director		1995
Joseph C. Galante		53	Director		1998
W. Reid Sanders		54	Director		2000
W. Reid Sanders		53	Director		2000
Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr.		43	Director, Secretary		1993
Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr.		42	Director, Secretary		1993
Greg Janese		45	President		2001
Kyle Young		47	Director		1996
Bryan J. Cusworth		44	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer		1996, 1999
Greg Janese		44	President		2001
Bryan J. Cusworth		43	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer		1996, 1999

Thomas J. Weaver III has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since its inception. Mr. Weaver also served as President until January 2001. From 1986 to 1988, Mr. Weaver served as president of Hard Rock International plc, an English public company whose securities traded on the London Stock Exchange and the American Stock Exchange. Since 1988 he has been the President of Heritage Trust Company, a corporation with investments in numerous public and private companies. Mr. Weaver devotes his full-time efforts to the business operations of the Company. Mr. Weaver is the brother of Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr.

Frank Bumstead, since 1989, has been ~~Chairman~~President ~~of the Board~~ or ~~President~~Chairman and a ~~principal~~ principal stockholder of Flood, Bumstead, McCready & McCarthy, Inc., a business management firm which represents the financial interests of artists, song writers and producers in the music industry ~~since 1989~~. From 1993 until 1999, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and was a principal stockholder, of FBMS Financial, Inc., a registered investment advisor under the Investment Company Act of 1940. From 1986 to December 1990, Mr. Bumstead was President of Bumstead Co., a financial consulting company. He is also a lead director of American Retirement Corp. and a director of Syntroleum, Inc.

Charles Flood, since 1989, has been ~~the Treasurer or Chairman of the Board and~~ a principal stockholder of Flood, Bumstead, McCready & McCarthy, Inc., a business management firm which represents the financial interests of artists, song writers and producers in the music industry ~~since 1989~~. Prior to that time, Mr. Flood worked at Capitol Records in Nashville as the Director of Artist Relations and later as Director of Talent Acquisition.

~~Joseph C~~W. Reid ~~Galante~~Sanders ~~has~~is ~~been~~a ~~the~~director of Harbor Global Co., Ltd. and Chairman of the ~~RCA~~Regional ~~Label~~Selection ~~GroupRLG/Nashville~~Committee for the Jefferson Scholarship at the ~~since~~University ~~1995.~~of ~~From~~Virginia ~~1990~~and toon ~~1994~~the University’s National Advisory Board, ~~Mr. Galante~~a member ~~served~~of asthe ~~President~~Advisory Board of the ~~RCA~~University of Tennessee at Memphis, a ~~Records~~Trustee ~~Label/US.~~of ~~From~~the ~~1982~~Hugo ~~through~~Dixon ~~1991~~Foundation, ~~Mr. Galante~~and ~~served~~serves ason ~~President~~the Board of Trustees of ~~RCA~~The ~~Records/Nashville.~~Dixon ~~Mr. Galante~~Gallery and Gardens and is aon ~~director~~the Board of ~~First~~Trustees, ~~American~~Rhodes ~~National~~College. Mr. ~~Bank~~Sanders ~~Advisory~~also ~~Board,~~serves ~~Leadership~~on ~~Music~~the ~~and~~Advisory ~~the~~Board ~~Country~~of ~~Music~~SSM ~~Association.~~Venture HePartner isFunds, L.P. ~~also~~From ~~Chairman~~1976 ofto ~~the~~2000, TMr.J. Sanders ~~Martell~~was ~~Foundation~~President of Long Leaf Partners Funds.

MrFrank A. ~~Sanders~~ ~~has~~McKinnie ~~served~~Weaver, Sr. serves as ~~Executive~~Senior Vice President, ~~of Southeastern Asset~~FTN ~~Management~~Financial, ~~and~~a ~~President~~subsidiary of ~~Longleaf~~First ~~Partners~~Tennessee ~~Funds~~National ~~since~~Corporation ~~1976~~(FTN) located in Memphis, Tennessee. In his capacity at FTN, Mr. ~~Sanders~~Weaver isfocuses on aCorrespondent ~~Director~~Banking, ofCorporate ~~Harbor~~Finance, ~~Global~~and ~~Company,~~the ~~Ltd~~delivery and acreation ~~member~~ of financial ~~the~~products ~~Advisory~~and ~~Board~~services ~~of SSM~~for ~~Venture~~institutional ~~Partners~~clients. Prior to joining FTN. Mr. ~~Sanders~~Weaver ~~serves~~served onas ~~the~~First ~~Board~~Vice ofPresident, ~~Trustees~~Correspondent ofBanking ~~Rhodes~~at ~~College~~National Bank of Commerce (“NBC”), ~~the~~Memphis, ~~Hugo~~Tennessee. ~~Dixon~~Mr. Weaver ~~Foundation~~served ~~and~~at NBC ~~the~~for ~~Dixon~~five ~~Gallery~~(5) years ~~and~~prior ~~Gardens.~~to Mrjoining FTN. ~~Sanders~~ isPrior ~~Chairman~~to ofNBC, ~~the~~Mr. Weaver ~~Regional~~served The ~~Selection~~Whiteville ~~Committee~~Bank ~~for~~from ~~the~~1985 ~~Jefferson Scholarship~~to at1994, ~~the~~leaving ~~University~~that ofinstitution ~~Virginia~~as Vice President and aDirector ~~member~~to ofjoin ~~its~~NBC ~~National~~in ~~Advisory Board~~Memphis, Tennessee. Mr. ~~Sanders~~Weaver is also a Director ~~member~~ of ~~the~~Heritage ~~Advisory~~Trust ~~Board~~Company ofand ~~the~~President ~~University~~ of ~~Tennessee~~ atHeritage ~~Memphis~~Plantation Company. ~~and~~Mr. ~~Vice~~Weaver ~~Chairman~~is of the ~~Board~~brother of ~~The~~Thomas ~~Hutchinson~~J. ~~School~~Weaver III.

Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr. has served as Vice President, Correspondent Banking, of First Tennessee Bank, N.A., since 1999. Prior to joining First Tennessee Bank, Mr. Weaver served as Vice President, Correspondent Banking at National Bank of Commerce (“NBC”), Memphis, Tennessee. Mr. Weaver served at NBC for five (5) years prior to joining First Tennessee Bank. Prior to NBC, Mr. Weaver served The Whiteville Bank from 1985 to 1994, leaving that institution as Vice President and Director to join NBC in Memphis, Tennessee. Mr. Weaver is also a Director of Heritage Trust Company and is President of Heritage Farms of Hickory Valley, Inc. Mr. Weaver is the brother of Thomas J. Weaver III.

Kyle Young has been the Deputy Director of the Country Music Foundation (the “CMF”) since 1985. From 1975 to 1985, Mr. Young was employed by the CMF in various capacities, including involvement in the development and licensing of television shows, radio programs and music festivals produced by the CMF. Mr. Young is involved in the Country Music Association, the National Academy of the Recording Arts and Sciences, the National Association of Independent Record Distributors, the Nashville Entertainment Association, the Inter-Museum Council of Nashville, the Nashville Institute for the Arts and Vanderbilt University Press.

Greg M. Janese currently serves as President of the Company and served as an Executive Vice President from April 1997 until January 2001. He has led the Company’s Corporate Communications and Entertainment division since April 1997, when the Company acquired Avalon Entertainment Group, Inc. (“AEG”). Mr. Janese has over 20 years of experience in the entertainment industry. From 1993 to 1997, he served as President of AEG. He co-founded The Entertainment Group, a Nashville based concert promotion and production company and the predecessor to AEG, in 1989. In 1987, Mr. Janese founded World Class Productions, a corporate production firm partnered with Barbara Mandrell. Prior to that, Mr. Janese was involved in various capacities with artist promotions, public relations, and booking and producing talent for corporate meeting and special events.

Bryan J. Cusworth has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 1996 and Treasurer since 1999. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cusworth was employed by Arthur Andersen LLP from July 1982 to September 1996, where he specialized in the resort, real estate and entertainment industries. Mr. Cusworth is a certified public accountant.

Audit Committee

The Company has separately-designated standing Audit Committee of the Board of Directors established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the Audit Committee are Frank Bumstead (Chairman), Charles Flood and W. Reid Sanders. None of the members of the Audit Committee meets the requirements of an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, the Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member has sufficient financial expertise to effectively and competently discharge the responsibilities of such position. In addition, the Audit Committee has the authority to engage independent accountants, legal counsel or other experts or consultants as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. Accordingly, the Company believes the qualification and experience of the members of the Audit Committee, and their ability to use outside advisors as they consider appropriate, affords them sufficient background and expertise to fulfill their obligations without the necessity of including an “audit committee financial expert” at the present time.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires that Company directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). ~~Officers,~~Such ~~directors~~persons ~~and stockholders who own more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock~~ are required by the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based on a review of such forms, the Company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders were complied with for the year ended December 31, ~~2002~~2003.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and any other persons performing similar functions. The Company will provide to any person, without charge and upon request, a copy of this code of ethics. All such requests should be mailed to: TBA Entertainment Corporation, 16501 Ventura Blvd., Suite 601, Encino, California 91436, Attention: Bryan J. Cusworth.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table sets forth the total compensation paid or accrued by the Company for the ~~three~~ years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, on behalf of each of the named executive officers of the Company.

Summary Compensation Table

												Long Term
					Annual Compensation						Long TermCompensation
						Annual Compensation						Compensation
Name and Principle Position		Year			Salary			Bonus			Options (#)
Name and Principle Position			Year			Salary			Bonus			Options (#)
Thomas J. Weaver, III			2003		$	350,000		$	-0-			-0-
Thomas J. Weaver, III				2002		$	350,000		$	-0-			-0-
Chairman of the Board,			2002			350,000			-0-			-0-
	Chairman of the Board,			2001			350,000			-0-			-0-
Chief Executive Officer			2001			350,000			-0-			-0-
	Chief Executive Officer			2000			350,000			-0-			175,000
Greg M. Janese			2003			318,750			-0-			-0-
Greg M. Janese				2002			200,000			50,000-			-0-
President			2002			200,000			50,000			-0-
	President			2001			200,000			-0-			-0-
			2001			200,000			-0-			-0-
	Chief Operating Officer			2000			200,000			50,000			75,000
Bryan J. Cusworth			2003			200,000			-0-			-0-
Bryan J. Cusworth				2002			200,000			-0-			-0-
Executive Vice President			2002			200,000			-0-			-0-
	Executive Vice President			2001			200,000			-0-			-0-
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer			2001			200,000			-0-			-0-
	Chief Financial Officer			2000			200,000			-0-			75,000
	and Treasurer

4240

The following table sets forth information with respect to stock options held by the named executive officers of the Company on December 31, ~~2002~~2003. The closing price for the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, ~~2002~~2003 (the last trading day of the year) was $1.36. None of the executive officers exercised any stock options during ~~2002~~2003.

Aggregated Fiscal Year-End Option Values

	Number of
	Number of Securities		Value of Unexercised
	Securities
	Underlying Unexercised Options at FY-End		In-the-Money Options at FY-End
	Underlying		Value of Unexercised
	Unexercised Options		In-the-Money
	at FY-End		Options at FY-End
Name and Principal Position	Exercisable/Unexercisable		Exercisable/Unexercisable
Thomas J. Weaver III Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer		750,000 / -0-	$	-0- /$-0-
Thomas J. Weaver III		300,000 / -0-	$	-0- / $-0-
Greg M. Janese President Chief Operating Officer		50,000 / 25,000		-0- /-0-
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
Bryan J. Cusworth Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer		206,000 / 39,000		-0- /-0-
Greg M. Janese		75,000 / -0-		-0- / -0-
President
Bryan J. Cusworth		245,000 / -0-		-0- / -0-
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with Thomas J. Weaver III for a term of five years, commencing January 1, 1994. The agreement provided for an initial annual base salary of $125,000, with increases at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Pursuant to action taken by the Board of Directors, Mr. Weaver’s current annual base salary is $350,000. The agreement also provides for an annual bonus as determined by the Board of Directors based on the operating results of the Company. The agreement is automatically renewed on each anniversary date for an additional five-year term unless it is terminated by either party prior to the anniversary date. The agreement provides that Mr. Weaver is entitled to payment for the unexpired portion of the current term in the event his employment is terminated without cause by the Company. Under the agreement, “cause” is defined to include failure to perform the duties of his office, breach of fiduciary duty to the Company and willful violation of the confidentiality or non-competition provisions of the agreement.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with Greg M. Janese, for an original term commencing on April 21, 1997 and continuing through December 31, 2002. The term of the agreement was extended to May 31, 2005 pursuant to a modification agreement entered into with Mr. Janese in May 2002. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $275,000, with increases at the discretion of the Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Janese is entitled to participate in applicable incentive plans established by the Company. If the Company terminates the employment of Mr. Janese without cause, or if Mr. Janese terminates his employment for good reason, he will be entitled to the greater of $400,000 or Mr. Janese’s base salary for the remaining term of the agreement, plus incentive compensation for the portion of the year in which he was employed. “Cause” is defined to include failure to perform his duties to the Company, breach of the agreement, fraud, embezzlement, conviction of certain serious crimes, conduct harmful to the Company and failure of Mr. Janese to achieve certain performance objectives. “Good reason” is defined to include a material breach of the agreement by the Company, which remains uncured for 30 days after receipt of written notice of breach. The agreements contain certain covenants by Mr. Janese not to compete with the business of the Company both during the term of employment and for a period of two years following the termination of employment.

Compensation of Directors

Directors who are officers and employees of the Company receive no compensation, as such, for serving as members of the Board. Directors who are not officers or employees of the Company are entitled to receive $100 for each Board meeting personally attended, and all Directors are reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

NoDuring ~~person~~2003, ~~who~~the ~~served~~members asof athe ~~member~~Compensation Committee of the ~~Company’s~~Board ~~Compensation~~of Directors ~~Committee~~were W. Reid Sanders (Chairman) and Frank Bumstead. Neither Mr. ~~during~~Sanders ~~2002~~nor Mr. Bumstead (i) was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during such year, (ii) was formerly an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or (iii) was a party to any ~~material~~ transaction ~~set forth under “Certain Relationships and Related~~ ~~Transactions.”~~required

~~No executive officer of the Company served as a member of the compensation~~41 ~~or similar committee or board of directors of any other entity one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee or Board of Directors of the Company.~~

to be set forth under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

No executive officer of the Company served as a member of the compensation or similar committee or board of directors of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee or Board of Directors of the Company.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.

The following table sets forth as of April 158, ~~2003~~2004 certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock by (i) each person who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company, (ii) each of the Company’s directors, (iii) each of the Company’s executive officers and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned. In each case, the number of shares includes the beneficial ownership of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days. Any shares not outstanding which are subject to such options and beneficially owned by a person in the table below are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding securities of the class owned by such person but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class beneficially owned by any other person. None of the stockholders listed below beneficially owns any shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock.

For a summary of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans, see “Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.”

4442

	Common Stock
	Number of Shares
Name and Address (1)	Beneficially Owned			Percent of Total
Name and Address(1)	Beneficially Owned			Percent of Total
Thomas Jackson Weaver III		1,~~232~~043,~~839(2)~~443	(2)(7)		1513.56	%
Frank Bumstead		24,958			*
Charles Flood		24,958			*
Joseph C. Galante		30,000(3)			*
W. Reid Sanders		110,000	(3)		1.5	%
W. Reid Sanders		110,000(3)			1.4	%
Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr.		226,764	(4)		3.1	%
Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr.		54,000			*
Greg M. Janese		252,460	(5)		3.4	%
Kyle Young					*
Bryan J. Cusworth		245,000	(6)		3.2	%
Greg M. Janese		227,460(4)			2.9	%
TBA Holdings, LLC		660,075	(7)		8.9	%
Bryan J. Cusworth		206,000(5)			2.6	%
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc.(8)		492,300			6.7	%
Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc.(6)		583,700			7.3	%
All executive officers and directors a group (seven (7) persons)(2) (3) (4) (5) (6)		1,927,583			24.0	%
Wellington Management Company, LLP(7)		374,300			4.7	%
All executive officers and directors a group (nine (9) persons)(2)(3)(4)(5)		1,910,215			24.0	%

*		Less than 1%.
(1)		The address for Mr. Thomas J. Weaver III is 402 Heritage Plantation Way, Hickory Valley, Tennessee 38042; the address for Messrs. Bumstead and Flood is 1700 Hayes Street, Suite 304, Nashville, Tennessee 37203; the address for Mr. ~~Galante is 1400 18th Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee 37212; the address for Mr.~~ Sanders is 5100 Wheelis Drive, Suite 206, Memphis, Tennessee 38117; the address for Mr. Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr. is 402 Heritage Plantation Way, Hickory Valley, Tennessee 38042; the address for Mr. ~~Young~~Janese is 4300 ~~Music~~Tenth ~~Square~~Avenue ~~East~~South, Nashville, Tennessee 37203; the address for Mr. Cusworth is 16501 Ventura Blvd., Suite 601, Encino, California 91436; and the address for ~~Mr.~~Dimensional ~~Janese~~Fund Advisors, Inc. is ~~300~~1299 ~~Tenth~~Ocean Avenue, ~~South~~11th Floor, ~~Nashville~~Santa Monica, ~~Tennessee~~California ~~37203;~~90401: the address for ~~Dimensional~~TBA ~~Fund Advisors~~Holdings, ~~Inc.~~LLC is ~~1299~~177 ~~Ocean~~Broad ~~Avenue~~Street, ~~11th~~Stamford, ~~Floor~~Connecticut 06901; (2) Includes (a) 300,000 ~~Santa~~shares ~~Monica~~issuable to Mr. Weaver upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, ~~California~~(b) ~~90401;~~77,236 ~~and~~shares held by the ~~address~~Katherine ~~for~~McKinnie ~~Wellington~~Weaver ~~Management~~Trust ~~Company~~IV, ~~LLP~~of which Mr. Weaver is 75trustee ~~State~~and ~~Street~~(c) 83,368 ~~Boston~~shares held by Heritage Plantation Foundation, ~~Massachusetts~~Inc., ~~02109~~of which Mr. Weaver and his family members control the board of trustees.
(2)		Includes (a) 300,000 shares issuable to Mr. Weaver upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and (b) 250,000 shares held by the Katherine McKinnie Weaver Trust IV, of which Mr. Weaver is trustee.
(3)		Includes 25,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options.
(4)		Includes 50172,~~000~~764 shares ~~issuable~~held toby ~~Mr.~~the ~~Janese~~Katherine ~~upon~~McKinnie ~~the~~Weaver ~~exercise~~VI Ltd., of ~~existing~~which ~~stock~~Mr. ~~options~~Weaver controls the sole general partner.
(5)		Includes ~~206~~75,000 shares issuable to Mr. ~~Cusworth~~Janese upon the exercise of ~~outstanding~~existing stock options.
(6)		~~Dimensional~~Includes ~~Fund Advisors Inc. (“Dimensional”)~~245,000 anshares ~~investment~~issuable ~~advisor registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice~~ to ~~four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manger to certain other commingled group trusts and separate accounts~~Mr. ~~(These~~Cusworth ~~investment~~upon ~~companies, trusts and accounts are~~ the ~~“Funds.”)~~exercise ~~In its role as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional possessed voting and/or investment power over 583,700 shares~~ of ~~Common~~outstanding ~~Stock~~stock ~~as of February 12, 2003~~options. ~~The Funds own all securities reported in this table, and Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities.~~
(7)		~~Information~~The ~~derived~~Company, ~~from~~TBA Holdings, LLC (“TBA Holdings”), and a wholly-owned subsidiary of TBA Holdings have entered into a Merger Agreement, whereby TBA Holdings will acquire all of the ~~Form~~outstanding ~~13G~~capital ~~filed~~stock of the Company. In connection with the ~~Securities~~Merger ~~and~~Agreement, ~~Exchange~~Thomas ~~Commission~~J. onWeaver ~~February~~III 12has entered into a Voting Agreement with TBA Holdings, ~~2003~~whereby byMr. ~~Wellington~~Weaver ~~Management~~granted ~~Company~~an irrevocable proxy to Holdings to vote the 660,075 ~~LLP~~shares over which he holds voting power in accordance with the terms of the Voting Agreement. TBA Holdings may be deemed to share voting power with respect to these shares. The Voting Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of the termination of the Merger Agreement or the closing of the merger.
(8)		Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. (“Dimensional”), an investment advisor registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manger to certain other commingled group trusts and separate accounts. (These investment companies, trusts and accounts are the “Funds.”) In its role as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional possessed voting and/or investment power over 492,300 shares of Common Stock as of February 6, 2004. The Funds own all securities reported in this table, and Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities.

4543

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

In connection with the restructuring of the Company’s bank credit facility in April 2002 (See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10K), an entity controlled by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“Heritage”), loaned the Company $500,000 (“Affiliate Loan”). Conditioned upon the funding of the Affiliate Loan, which occurred on April 15, 2002, the bank agreed to loan the Company an additional $500,000 (“New Bank Loan”). The proceeds from both loans were used to make required payments pursuant to the Company’s acquisition notes payable and for working capital purposes. The New Bank Loan and the Affiliate Loan were repaid in June 2003, upon receipt of the Company’s federal income tax refund.

In connection with the restructuring of the Company’s bank credit facility in April 2002 (See Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10K), an entity controlled by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“Heritage”), loaned the Company $500,000 (“Affiliate Loan”). Conditioned upon the funding of the Affiliate Loan, which occurred on April 15, 2002, the bank agreed to loan the Company an additional $500,000 (“New Bank Loan”). The proceeds from both loans were used to make required payments pursuant to the Company’s acquisition notes payable and for working capital purposes. The New Bank Loan and the Affiliate Loan were repaid in June 2002, upon receipt of the Company’s federal income tax refund.

In order to provide the Affiliate Loan, Heritage obtained a $500,000 loan from an independent third party finance company (“Pass-Through Loan”). The Pass-Through Loan was secured by 950,336 shares of TBA common stock held by the Chief Executive Officer (772,876 shares) and President (177,460 shares) of the Company and a personal guarantee by the President of the Company. The Pass-Through Loan was repaid concurrently with the repayment of the Affiliate Loan. As a condition to obtaining the Pass-Through Loan, Heritage paid a fee of $5,000 and interest accrued at 12% per annum. These costs were passed-through to the Company as part of the Affiliate Loan.

ITEM 14. ~~CONTROLS~~PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND ~~PROCEDURES~~SERVICES

The ~~Company’s~~following ~~Chief~~represents ~~Executive~~fees ~~Officer,~~for ~~Chief~~professional ~~Operating~~audit ~~Officer~~services ~~and~~rendered ~~Chief~~by ~~Financial~~BDO ~~Officer have concluded~~Seidman, ~~based on their evaluation as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this report~~LLP, ~~that~~ the Company’s ~~disclosure controls~~principal ~~and~~accountant, ~~procedures~~for ~~are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by~~ the ~~Company~~audit ~~in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act~~ of ~~1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within~~ the ~~time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission~~Company’s ~~rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to~~ ~~ensure~~annual ~~that~~financial ~~information~~statements ~~required~~for ~~to be disclosed by~~ the ~~Company~~years inended ~~such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management~~December 31, ~~including~~2003 ~~the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer~~ and ~~the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure~~2002.

~~There~~Audit ~~were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in~~Fees ~~other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the~~ ~~date of such evaluation, and there were no corrective actions required with~~ ~~regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.~~

46 BDO billed the Company aggregate fees of $109,500 in 2003 and $107,600 in 2002 for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

Audit-Related Fees

BDO did not bill the Company fees during 2003 or 2002 for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements, and that are not reported above under the caption “Audit Fees.”

Tax Fees

BDO billed the Company aggregate fees of $61,500 in 2003 and $56,500 in 2002 for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All Other Fees

BDO did not bill the Company fees during 2003 or 2002 for products and services other than the services described above in this Item 14.

Before BDO is engaged by the Company to render any audit or non-audit services, the engagement must be approved by the Company’s Audit Committee.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.

(a)	(1)	Financial Statements – See page 20 of this Report.
	(2)	Financial Statement Schedules – None.
	(3)	Exhibits.

(a) (1) Financial Statements – See page 19 of this Report.

EXHIBIT
NUMBER		DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
2.1(1)		— Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation, TBA Entertainment Holding Corporation, Robert R. Titley and Clarence Spalding dated June 18, 1998.
2.2(2)		— Stock Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation, Karin Glass& Associates, Inc., Ink Up, Inc., KGA, Inc., Karin Glass and Kenneth Glass dated March 18, 1999.
2.3(3)		— Stock Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation , Robert Romeo and Romeo Entertainment Group, Inc. dated November 26,1999
2.4(4)		— Stock Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation, Mike Atkins and Mike Atkins Management, Inc. dated December 6, 1999.
2.5(5)		— Stock Purchase Agreement by and among TBA Entertainment Corporation, Edward James Dougherty, Janet L. Dougherty, John F. Dougherty, John F. Dougherty, Eva Dougherty, The Ed & Jan Dougherty Charitable Remainder Trust and EJD Concert Services, Inc. dated March 31, 2000.
2.6(6)		— Stock Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation, Moore Entertainment, Inc. and Stephen F. Moore dated February 6, 2001.
3.1(7)		— Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.
3.2(8)		— Bylaws of the Company.
4.1(9)		— Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
4.2		— Article IX of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (included in Exhibit 3.1).
4.3(10)		— Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company.
10.1(11)		— Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 1994 between the Company and Thomas Jackson Weaver III.
10.2(12)		— Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of the directors and executive officers.
10.3(13)		— TBA Entertainment Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan.
10.4(14)		— Form of Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 1995 Stock Option Plan.
10.5(15)		— TBA Entertainment Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan.
10.6(16)		— Form of Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 1997 Stock Option Plan.
10.7(17)		— Registration Rights Agreement between the Company, Robert E. Geddes, Greg M. Janese, Thomas Miserendino, Brian K. Murphy and Marc W. Oswald.
10.8(18)		— Employment Agreement between Avalon Entertainment Group, Inc. and Greg M. Janese.
10.9(19)		— TBA Entertainment Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10.10(20)		— Loan and Security Agreement among AmSouth Bank and TBA Entertainment Corporation and its subsidiaries dated October 10, 2001.
21*		— Subsidiaries of the Company.
23*		— Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants.
99.1*		— Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
99.2*		— Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules – None.

* Filed herewith (3) Exhibits.


EXHIBIT
NUMBER		DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
2.1(1)	—	Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation, TBA Entertainment Holding Corporation, Robert R. Titley and Clarence Spalding dated June 18, 1998.

2.2(2)	—	Stock Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation, Karin Glass & Associates, Inc., Ink Up, Inc., KGA, Inc., Karin Glass and Kenneth Glass dated March 18, 1999.

2.3(3)	—	Stock Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation , Robert Romeo and Romeo Entertainment Group, Inc. dated November 26, 1999

2.4(4)	—	Stock Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation, Mike Atkins and Mike Atkins Management, Inc. dated December 6, 1999.

2.5(5)	—	Stock Purchase Agreement by and among TBA Entertainment Corporation, Edward James Dougherty, Janet L. Dougherty, John F. Dougherty, John F. Dougherty, Eva Dougherty, The Ed & Jan Dougherty Charitable Remainder Trust and EJD Concert Services, Inc. dated March 31, 2000.

2.6(6)	—	Stock Purchase Agreement among TBA Entertainment Corporation. Moore Entertainment, Inc. and Stephen F. Moore dated February 6, 2001.

2.7(7)	—	Merger Agreement by and among TBA Holdings, LLC, TBA Merger Sub, Inc. and TBA Entertainment Corporation, dated April 8, 2004.

3.1(8)	—	Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.

3.2(9)	—	Bylaws of the Company.

4.1(10)	—	Specimen Common Stock Certificate.

4.2	—	Article IX of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (included in Exhibit 3.1).

4.3(11)	—	Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company.

10.1(12)	—	Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 1994 between the Company and Thomas Jackson Weaver III.

10.2(13)	—	Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each of the directors and executive officers.

10.3(14)	—	TBA Entertainment Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan.

10.4(15)	—	Form of Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 1995 Stock Option Plan.

10.5(16)	—	TBA Entertainment Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan.

10.6(17)	—	Form of Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 1997 Stock Option Plan.

10.7(18)	—	Registration Rights Agreement between the Company, Robert E. Geddes, Greg M. Janese, Thomas Miserendino, Brian K. Murphy and Marc W. Oswald.

10.8(19)	—	Employment Agreement between Avalon Entertainment Group, Inc. and Greg M. Janese.

10.9(20)	—	TBA Entertainment Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan

10.10(21)	—	Loan and Security Agreement among AmSouth Bank and TBA Entertainment Corporation and its subsidiaries dated October 10, 2001.

10.11*	—	Sixth Amendment to Loan Documents and Agreement among AmSouth Bank and TBA Entertainment Corporation and its subsidiaries, dated April 14, 2004.

21*	—	Subsidiaries of the Company.

23*	—	Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

31.1*	—	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2*	—	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

(1)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated on June 18, 1998.
EXHIBIT
(2)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.
NUMBER		DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT
(3)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
32.1*	—	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
(4)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
32.2*	—	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(5)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000.
(6)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.
(7)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1997.
(8)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1997.
(9)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1997.
(10)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1997.
(11)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 33-69944) dated December 8, 1993.
(12)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.
(13)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.
(14)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996.
(15)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996.
(16)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996.
(17)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996.
(18)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 20, 1997.
(19)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-62284) dated June 5, 2001.
(20)	Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
(b)	Reports on Form 8-K.

*		Filed herewith.

(1)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated on June 18, 1998.

(2)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.

(3)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

(4)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

(5)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000.

(6)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

(7)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2004.

(8)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1997.

(9)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1997.

(10)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1997.

(11)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 1997.

(12)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 33-69944) dated December 8, 1993.

(13)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 33-69944) dated December 8, 1993.

(14)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.

(15)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.

(16)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996.

(17)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996.

(18)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996.

No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002.

(19)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 20, 1997.

(20)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-62284) dated June 5, 2001.

(21)		Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.

(b)		Reports on Form 8-K. No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003.

4947

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Jackson Weaver III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of TBA Entertainment Corporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

April 15, 2003		By: /s/ Thomas Jackson Weaver III
		Thomas Jackson Weaver III
		Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.

CERTIFICATION

I, Bryan J. Cusworth, certify that:

April 15, 2003		By: /s/ Bryan J. Cusworth
		Bryan J. Cusworth
		Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
		Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by ~~the~~ the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized ~~in the city of Hickory Valley~~, ~~Tennessee,~~ on the ~~15th~~14th day of April ~~2003~~ 2004.


TBA ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

By:		/s/ THOMAS JACKSON WEAVER III

		Thomas Jackson Weaver III
		Chairman of the Board and
		Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and ~~by the following persons~~ in the capacities and on the dates stated.

SIGNATURE	TITLE	DATE
/s/ THOMAS JACKSON WEAVER III	Chairman of the Board,	April 15, 2003
/s/ THOMAS JACKSON WEAVER III Thomas Jackson Weaver III	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	April 14, 2004
	Chief Executive Officer
/s/ FRANK BUMSTEAD Frank Bumstead	Director	April 14, 2004
Thomas Jackson Weaver III	(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ CHARLES FLOOD Charles Flood	Director	April 14, 2004
/s/ JOSEPH C. GALANTE	Director	April 15, 2003
/s/ W. REID SANDERS W. Reid Sanders	Director	April 14, 2004
Joseph C. Galante
/s/ FRANK A. McKINNIE WEAVER, SR. Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr.	Director	April 14, 2004
/s/ FRANK BUMSTEAD	Director	April 15, 2003
/s/ BRYAN J. CUSWORTH Bryan J. Cusworth	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)	April 14, 2004
Frank Bumstead
/s/ CHARLES FLOOD	Director	April 15, 2003
Charles Flood
/s/ W. REID SANDERS	Director	April 15, 2003
W. Reid Sanders
/s/ FRANK A. McKINNIE WEAVER, SR.	Director	April 15, 2003
Frank A. McKinnie Weaver, Sr.
/s/ KYLE YOUNG	Director	April 15, 2003
Kyle Young
/s/ BRYAN J. CUSWORTH	Chief Financial Officer	April 15, 2003
	(Principal Accounting and
Bryan J. Cusworth	Financial Officer)

5248

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.	~~DESCRIPTION~~	DESCRIPTION
21	— Subsidiaries of the Company.
10.11	—	Sixth Amendment to Loan Documents and Agreement among AmSouth Bank and TBA Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries, dated April 14, 2004.
23	— Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants.
21	—	Subsidiaries of the Company.
99.1	— Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
23	—	Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountant
99.2	— Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
31.1	—	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2	—	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1	—	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32.2	—	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

DuringTable the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a loss of $2,390,400, net of income tax benefit, to reflect the write-down of its investment in the merchandising operations, which were discontinued in the first quarter of 2001. Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · TBA ENTERTAINMENT CORP