UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the quarterly period ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009

ORor


o		Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number: 000-52420

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Nebraska (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 22-3902184 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


Nebraska		22-3902184
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

1501 Knox Boulevard
Jackson, NE 68743
(Address of principal executive offices)

(402) 632-2676
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company þ

As of ~~February~~May 2315, 2009, there were 3,789 membership units outstanding.

INDEX

	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1
Item 1. Financial Statements		1
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		1114
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures		1723
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		1824
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		1824
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		1824
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		1824
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		1824
Item 5. Other Information		1825
Item 6. Exhibits		1926
SIGNATURES		2027
EX-10.1
EX-10.3
EX-10.4
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Condensed Balance Sheets

	December 31,			September 30,
	March 31,			September 30,
	2008			2008
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and equivalents	$	—677,156		$	4,130,632
Restricted cash		1383,~~089,817~~437			4,430,581
Accounts receivable		31,~~363~~829,~~785~~042			3,432,770
Inventory		23,~~924~~697,~~443~~135			4,097,906
Deposits and prepaid expenses		173,772			210,576
Prepaid expenses		532,993			210,576
Total current assets		7,~~551~~119,~~817~~763			16,302,465
Property and Equipment
Land and land improvements		9,740,984			9,740,984
Buildings		8,~~505~~508,~~350~~565			8,500,470
Office equipment and furnishings		224,004			223,079
Plant equipment and machinery		6061,~~125~~391,~~997~~209			59,945,892
Construction in progress		~~946,551~~—			603,338
		79,542,886			79,013,763
		79,864,762			79,013,763
Less accumulated depreciation		(810,~~753~~093,~~375~~925	)		(7,436,643	)
Net property and equipment		7069,~~789~~770,~~511~~837			71,577,120
Other Assets
Restricted cash		403,~~000~~279			404,807
Construction deposit		500,000			500,000
Debt issuance costs, net of amortization		~~385~~364,~~138~~953			394,646
Deposits and other		316,894			312,112
Other		450,498			312,112
Total other assets		1,~~605~~718,~~032~~730			1,611,565
Total Assets	$	7978,~~946~~609,~~360~~330		$	89,491,150
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Line of credit	$	1,816,114		$	703,034
Current maturities of long-term debt		34,~~751~~940,~~503~~038			4,992,970
Checks written in excess of bank balance		278,149			—
Accounts payable		2,374,457			3,368,785
Accounts payable		3,722,143			3,368,785
Accrued expenses		1,411,353			2,860,884
Accrued expenses		1,675,326			2,860,884
Derivative instruments		277,353			3,747,589
Derivative instruments		898,886			3,747,589
Construction payable		122,610			271,836
Construction payable		320,821			271,836
Total current liabilities		10,941,925			15,945,098
Total current liabilities		12,462,942			15,945,098
Long-Term Debt, net of current maturities		29,776,012			25,113,869
Long-Term Debt, net of current maturities		28,706,990			25,113,869
Other Long-Term Liabilities		271,810			281,694
Other Long-Term Liabilities		276,752			281,694
Commitments and Contingencies
Members’ Equity, 3,789 units issued and outstanding		3837,~~499~~619,~~676~~583			48,150,489
Total Liabilities and Members’ Equity	$	7978,~~946~~609,~~360~~330		$	89,491,150

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of these Statements.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Condensed Statements of Operations

	Three months ended			Three months ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	March 31,			March 31,
	2008			2007
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Revenues	$	2420,~~456~~540,~~854~~463		$	2732,~~006~~625,~~062~~878
Cost of Goods Sold		3120,~~941~~576,~~078~~061			1822,~~988~~065,~~137~~228
Lower of Cost or Market Adjustment		~~871~~207,~~213~~490			—
Gross Profit (Loss)		(8243,~~355,437~~088	)		810,~~017~~560,~~925~~650
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses		~~722~~435,~~814~~283			~~713~~438,~~894~~068
Operating Income (Loss)		(9678,~~078,251~~371	)		710,~~304~~122,~~031~~582
Other Income (Expense)
Interest income		86,~~761~~056			1521,~~877~~898
Interest expense		(~~582~~590,~~835~~188	)		(~~946~~781,~~823~~644	)
Other income		1382,~~512~~410			2212,~~758~~108
Total other expense, net		(~~572~~201,~~562~~722	)		(~~928~~547,~~188~~638	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(9880,~~650,813~~093	)	$	69,~~375~~574,~~843~~944
Weighted Average Units Outstanding — Basic and Diluted		3,789			3,789
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit — Basic and Diluted	$	(~~2,547~~232.0628	)	$	12,~~682~~527.7204
Distributions Per Unit — Basic and Diluted	$	—		$	—

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of these Statements.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Condensed Statements of ~~Cash Flows~~ Operations

	Three months ended			Three months ended
	Six months ended			Six months ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	March 31,			March 31,
	2008			2007
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Revenues	$	44,997,317		$	59,631,939
Net income (loss)	$	(9,650,813	)	$	6,375,843
Cost of Goods Sold		52,822,126			41,204,002
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from (used in) operations:
Lower of Cost or Market Adjustment		1,078,703			—
Depreciation and amortization		1,326,240			1,367,096
Gross Profit (Loss)		(8,903,512	)		18,427,937
Change in fair value of derivative instruments		1,039,682			(3,255,348	)
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses		843,602			942,667
Loss on lower of cost or market adjustment		871,213			—
Operating Income (Loss)		(9,747,114	)		17,485,270
Income earned on restricted cash and investments		(1,824	)		—
Other Income (Expense)
Non-cash interest income		(4,782	)		—
Interest income		14,817			37,775
Change in assets and liabilities:
Interest expense		(1,182,531	)		(1,787,124	)
Restricted cash		3,138,145			(1,128,613	)
Other income		383,922			214,866
Accounts receivable		68,985			(1,323,323	)
Total other expense, net		(783,792	)		(1,534,483	)
Inventory		746,385			(1,555,339	)
Net Income (Loss)	$	(10,530,906	)	$	15,950,787
Derivative instruments		(3,888,385	)		(35,725	)
Weighted Average Units Outstanding — Basic and Diluted		3,789			3,789
Deposits and prepaid expenses		36,804			(32,086	)
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit — Basic and Diluted	$	(2,779.34	)	$	4,209.76
Accounts payable		353,358			355,798
Distributions Per Unit — Basic and Diluted	$	—		$	—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(1,634,635	)		45,054
Net cash from (used in) operating activities		(7,599,627	)		813,357
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(480,138	)		(244,240	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(480,138	)		(244,240	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from line of credit		2,467,160			645,851
Payments on line of credit		(1,354,080	)		(159,512	)
Checks written in excess of bank balance		278,149			—
Payments on revolving term note		—			(5,300,000	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		2,816,920			—
Payments on long-term debt		(465,266	)		(1,198,010	)
Net withdrawals from restricted cash		206,250			185,284
Net cash from (used in) financing activities		3,949,133			(5,826,387	)
Net Decrease in Cash and Equivalents		(4,130,632	)		(5,257,270	)
Cash and Equivalents — Beginning of Period		4,130,632			5,924,234
Cash and Equivalents — End of Period	$	—		$	666,964
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest expensed	$	683,811		$	816,523
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Capital expenditures in construction payable	$	48,985		$	—

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of these Statements.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC ~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements December 31, 2008~~

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows


	Six months ended			Six months ended
	March 31,			March 31,
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	(10,530,906	)	$	15,950,787
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from (used in) operations:
Depreciation and amortization		2,686,975			2,714,267
Change in fair value of derivative instruments		232,052			(8,639,976	)
Loss on lower of cost or market adjustment		1,078,703			—
Income earned on restricted cash and investments		(2,126	)		(16,840	)
Other		(138,386	)		—
Change in assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		3,844,548			(477,887	)
Accounts receivable		1,603,728			(2,461,514	)
Inventory		(677,932	)		(1,237,247	)
Derivative instruments		(3,702,288	)		(2,092,216	)
Deposits and prepaid expenses		(322,417	)		1,155,454
Due to broker					635,140
Accounts payable		(994,328	)		(1,204,143	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(1,459,415	)		(3,924	)

Net cash from (used in) operating activities		(8,381,792	)		4,321,901

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(1,000,225	)		(462,975	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(1,000,225	)		(462,975	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from line of credit		2,467,161			771,000
Payments on line of credit		(1,354,081	)		(771,000	)
Checks written in excess of bank balance		—			251,012
Proceeds from revolving term note		5,197,920			1,000,000
Payments on revolving term note		(563,065	)		(5,300,000	)
Payments on long-term debt		(25,644	)		(4,899,456	)
Net withdrawals from restricted cash		206,250			187,568

Net cash from (used in) financing activities		5,928,541			(8,760,876	)


Net Decrease in Cash and Equivalents		(3,453,476	)		(4,901,950	)

Cash and Equivalents — Beginning of Period		4,130,632			5,924,234


Cash and Equivalents — End of Period	$	677,156		$	1,022,284


Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest expensed	$	1,095,184		$	1,455,150


Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Capital expenditures in construction payable	$	122,610		$	—

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements are an integral part of these Statements.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2009

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. These condensed financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2008, contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K.

In the opinion of management, the condensed interim financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) that we consider necessary to present fairly the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The results reported in these condensed interim financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.

Nature of Business

Siouxland Ethanol, LLC (the “Company”) operates a 50 million gallon per year ethanol plant (the “Plant”) in Dakota County, ~~Nebraska~~ ~~(the “Plant”)~~Nebraska. The Company produces and sells fuel ethanol and distillers grains, a co-product of the fuel ethanol production process, and corn oil.

Accounting Estimates

Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. The Company uses estimates and assumptions in accounting for the following significant matters, among others, the carrying value and useful lives of long-lived assets, and estimates of losses on forward contract commitments. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to our financial statements. The Company periodically reviews estimates and assumptions, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period in which the revision is made. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generally sells ethanol and related products pursuant to marketing agreements. The Company’s products are shipped FOB shipping point. Revenues are recognized when the marketing company has taken title and has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership, prices are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. The ethanol marketing agreement with Archer Daniels Midland (“ADM”) provides that an initial price per gallon of ethanol is established upon shipment. The Company settles the final price with ADM monthly based

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC ~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements December 31, 2008~~

~~upon~~Notes ~~the~~to ~~combined~~Unaudited ~~results~~Condensed ofFinancial the ethanol marketing pool in which the Company participates. The Company believes that all sales of ethanol during a month are recorded at a price that is both fixed and determinable and that there are no ethanol sales, during any given month, which should be considered contingent and recorded as deferred revenue. The Company’s products are shipped FOB shipping point. Statements

~~Income~~March 31, ~~Taxes~~ 2009

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the requirements of SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, relating to the recognition of income tax benefits. FIN 48 provides a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring tax benefits when realization of the benefits is uncertain. The first step is to determine whether the benefit meets the more-likely-than-not condition for recognition and the second step is to determine the amount to be recognized based on the cumulative probability that exceeds 50%. Primarily due to the Company’s tax status as a partnership, the adoption of FIN 48 on October 1, 2008, had no material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Reclassifications

The Company made certain reclassifications to the ~~statement~~statements of operations for the three ~~months~~and six months ending ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007~~2008, to conform to classifications for the three and six months ending ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2008~~ 2009. The statement of operations for the ~~2007~~2008 period was changed to reclassify ~~ethanol marketing~~ marketing fees and commissions of approximately $~~272~~372,000 and $654,000 for the three and six months period, respectively, netted against revenue rather than as a component of selling, general, and administrative expenses. InFreight ~~addition, freight~~ revenues of approximately $~~248~~212,000 and $460,000 for the three and six months period, respectively, previously netted with freight costs, isin cost of goods sold, are now included with revenues for the ~~2007~~2008 period. Additionally, certain indirect production taxes, insurance expense and compliance testing fees of approximately $34,000 and $242,000 for the three and six month period, respectively, are included in cost of goods sold rather than in selling, general and administrative expenses. Lastly, loan fees and amortization of capitalized debt issue costs of approximately $81,000 and $191,000 for the three and six months period, respectively, are included in interest expense rather than selling, general, and administrative expenses. These reclassifications had no effect on members’ equity, net income, or cash flows previously reported.

2. UNCERTAINTIES

The Company derives substantially all of its revenues from the sale of ethanol and distillers grains. These products are commodities and the market prices for these products display substantial volatility and are subject to a number of factors which are beyond the control of the Company. The Company’s most significant manufacturing inputs are corn and natural gas. The price of these commodities is also subject to substantial volatility and uncontrollable market factors. In addition, these input costs do not necessarily fluctuate with the market price for ethanol and distillers grains. As a result, the Company is subject to significant risk that its operating margins can be reduced or eliminated due to the relative movements in the market prices of its products and major manufacturing inputs. As a result, market fluctuations in the price of or demand for these commodities can have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s operations, profitability and the availability and adequacy of cash flow to meet the Company’s working capital ~~profitability~~requirements. The Company experienced negative margins during the three and six months ending March 31, 2009 and as a result, it has been out of compliance with certain provisions of the debt agreement. While the Company received waivers and the lenders have amended the debt agreement for these instances of non-compliance, in the event of future instances of non-compliance, there is no assurance that the Company will continue to receive additional waivers or amendments.

3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Effective October 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), as it applies to our financial instruments, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 157 defines fair value, outlines a framework for measuring fair value, and details the required disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 159 permits companies to irrevocably choose to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009

~~items at fair value. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to~~ facilitate comparison between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.

Under SFAS 157, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or most advantageous market. SFAS 157 establishes a hierarchy in determining the fair value of an asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy has three levels of inputs, both observable and unobservable. SFAS 157 requires the utilization of the lowest possible level of input to determine fair value. Level 1 inputs include quoted market prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are market data, other than Level 1, that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted market prices in an inactive market, and other observable information that can be corroborated by market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable and corroborated by little or no market data.

Except for those assets and liabilities which are required by authoritative accounting guidance to be recorded at fair value in our balance sheets, the Company has elected not to record any other assets or liabilities at fair value, as permitted by SFAS 159. No events occurred during the six ~~quarter~~months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, that would require adjustment to the recognized balances of assets or or liabilities which are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

The following table provides information on those assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

	Fair Value as of			Fair Value Measurement Using
	December 31,
	March 31, 2009			Level 1			Level 2		Level 3
	2008			Level 1			Level 2		Level 3
Restricted Cash — current	$	35,748		$	35,748		$	—	$	—
Restricted cash – current	$	35,725		$	35,725		$	—	$	—
Restricted Cash — long-term	$	403,279		$	403,279		$	—	$	—
Restricted cash – long-term	$	403,000		$	403,000		$	—	$	—
Commodity derivative instruments	$	(277,353	)	$	(277,353	)	$	—	$	—
Commodity derivative instruments	$	(898,886	)	$	(898,886	)	$	—	$	—

The fair value of the commodity derivative instruments, which relate to corn ~~and natural gas~~, and ~~restricted~~ ~~cash, which includes~~ money market funds, included in restricted cash are based on quoted market prices in an active market.

4. INVENTORY

Inventory consisted of the following at:

	December 31,		September 30,
	March 31,		September 30,
	2008		2008*
	2009		2008*
Raw materials	$	12,~~577~~252,~~171~~966	$	2,634,690
Supplies		~~342~~373,~~471~~543		340,485
Work in process		~~530~~520,~~710~~462		830,261
Finished goods		~~474~~550,~~091~~164		292,470
Total	$	23,~~924~~697,~~443~~135	$	4,097,906


*		Derived from audited financial statements.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009

The Company recorded a loss of approximately $~~427~~144,000 atand ~~December~~$571,000 for the three and six months ending March 31, ~~2008~~2009, related to inventory where the market value was determined to be less than the cost basis, attributable primarily to decreases in market prices of corn and ethanol. The loss was recorded with the lower of cost or market adjustment in the statement of operations.

5. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

AsFrom oftime ~~December 31,~~to ~~2008,~~time the Company ~~recorded~~enters ainto ~~liability~~derivative oftransactions ~~approximately~~to ~~$899,000~~hedge ~~related~~its toexposures ~~its~~to ~~fair~~commodity ~~value~~price ~~positions~~fluctuations. inDuring ~~derivative~~the ~~instruments.~~first ~~Additionally,~~quarter ~~approximately~~of $12008,~~054,000~~ the FASB issued Statement of ~~restricted~~Financial ~~cash~~Accounting atStandards ~~December~~No. 31161, ~~2008,~~Disclosures isabout ~~related~~Derivative toInstruments ~~margin~~and ~~requirements~~Hedging Activities, inan ~~the~~amendment ~~Company’s~~of ~~derivative accounts.~~FAS ~~The~~Statement ~~Company~~No. 133 ~~recorded~~(SFAS a161). ~~net~~This ~~loss~~statement onrequires holders of derivative instruments ofto ~~approximately~~provide ~~$5,722,000~~qualitative ~~and a~~disclosures ~~net~~about ~~gain~~objectives ofand ~~approximately~~strategies $3for using derivatives,~~705,000~~ ~~during~~quantitative ~~the~~disclosures ~~three~~about ~~months~~fair ~~ending~~value ~~December 31,~~amounts ~~2008~~of gains and ~~2007,~~losses from derivative ~~respectively~~instruments, ~~which~~and isdisclosures ~~included~~about incredit-risk-related ~~costs~~contingent offeatures ~~goods~~in ~~sold~~derivative agreements. ~~None~~The ofCompany ~~the~~adopted ~~derivative~~this ~~instrument~~statement ~~positions are~~effective ~~accounted~~in ~~for~~the asthree ~~fair~~months ~~value~~ended orMarch 31, ~~cash flow hedges~~2009.

As of March 31, 2009, the Company has entered into corn derivative instruments, which are required to be recorded as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. Derivatives qualify for treatment as hedges when there is a high correlation between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the related change in value of the underlying hedged item and when the Company formally documents, designates, and assesses the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting initially and on an on-going basis. The Company must designate the hedging instruments based upon the exposure being hedged as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. While the Company does not typically designate the derivative instruments that it enters into as hedging instruments because of the administrative costs associated with the related accounting, the Company believes that the derivative instruments represent an economic hedge. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes.

The Company enters into corn and natural gas commodity-based derivatives in order to protect cash flows from fluctuations caused by volatility in commodity prices for periods up to 24 months. These derivatives are put in place to protect gross profit margins from potentially adverse effects of market and price volatility on ethanol sales and corn purchase commitments where the prices are set at a future date. These derivatives are not designated as effective hedges for accounting purposes. For derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges, or for the ineffective portions of qualifying hedges, the change in fair value is recorded through earnings in the period of change. Gains and losses from corn and natural gas derivative instruments, including unrealized changes in the fair value of these positions, are included in the results of operations and are classified as costs of goods sold.

As of March 31, 2009, the notional amount of the Company’s outstanding corn derivative instruments was approximately 1,695,000 bushels that were entered into to hedge forecasted corn purchases through December 2009.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2009

The following tables provide details regarding the Company’s fair value of the derivative instruments at March 31, 2009, none of which are designated as hedging instruments:


	Balance Sheet location	Assets		Liabilities
Corn contracts	Derivative instruments	$	—	$	(277,353	)

In addition, as of March 31, 2009 the Company had approximately $348,000 of restricted cash related to margin requirements for the Company’s derivative instrument positions.

The following tables provide details regarding the gains and (losses) from Company’s derivative instruments in statements of operations, none of which are designated as hedging instruments:


	Statement of	Three-Months Ended March 31,
	Operations location	2009			2008
Corn contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	(779,712	)	$	7,655,253

Natural gas contracts	Cost of goods sold		(5,426	)		—


Totals		$	(785,138	)	$	7,655,253


	Statement of	Six-Months Ended March 31,
	Operations location	2009			2008
Corn contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	(6,366,684	)	$	11,360,317

Natural gas contracts	Cost of goods sold		(140,629	)		—


Totals		$	(6,507,313	)	$	11,360,317

6. LINE OF CREDIT

InThe ~~October 2006, the~~ Company ~~obtained~~has a line of credit for up to $3,500,000, subject to borrowing base limitations., ~~The term of the line of credit has been extended~~ until ~~May~~ July 2009. Interest accrues on the outstanding balance at the three-month LIBOR rate plus 34%, which totaled 5.2025% at ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2008~~2009, and is payable monthly. In accordance with an amendment to the loan agreement, beginning May 15, 2009, the minimum rate of interest on the line of credit will not be less than 5.0%. The Company is obligated to pay the lender ana ~~unused~~ commitment fee equal to 0.35% on the unused portion of the line. The Company had an outstanding balance on this line at ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2008~~2009, of $1,816,114. The line of credit is secured by a common credit agreement along with the revolving promissory note and the term note described in Note 7.

The Company maintains three standby letters of credit totaling approximately $1,684,000, which reduce the amount available on the line of credit. The letters of credit have been ~~obtained~~issued infor ~~lieu of security deposits otherwise required under~~ a rail car lease agreement, an electrical agreement and a natural gas agreement. An annual fee of 2.5% of the amount reserved is paid to the lender for the reservation under the letters of credit.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009

7. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following at:

	December 31,		September 30,
	March 31,		September 30,
	2008		2008*
	2009		2008*
Term note payable, see terms below	$	26,015,000	$	26,015,000
Revolving promissory note, see terms below		24,~~366~~634,~~920~~855		—
Tax increment financing		4,020,000		4,025,000
Equipment note		5646,~~573~~195		66,839
Total		3234,~~458~~716,~~493~~050		30,106,839
Less amounts due within one year		34,~~751~~940,~~503~~038		4,992,970
Net long-term debt	$	2829,~~706~~776,~~990~~012	$	25,113,869


*		Derived from audited financial statements.

Term Note

The Company has a term note which bears interest at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 34%, which totaled 5.2025% ~~December~~at March 31, ~~2008~~2009. In accordance with an amendment to the loan agreement, beginning May 15, 2009, the minimum rate of interest on variable rate borrowings under the term note will not be less than 5.0%. In April 2008, the Company elected to convert $17,500,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the term note to fixed rates of interest ranging from 5.65% to 6.69% for periods maturing from April 2009 through April 2012. A total of $5.5 million converted back to variable rate debt in April 2009. In addition to the ~~scheduled~~ scheduled payments, the Company is required to make additional principal payments within 120 days of each fiscal year end equal to 65% of the Company’s excess cash flow determined at the end of the fiscal year, but not to exceed $2,500,000 per fiscal year and an aggregate total of $8,000,000, provided such payments will not result in a default tounder other loan covenants. At September 30, 2008, the Company included an estimated excess cash flow payment of $2,500,000 with current maturities of long-term debt, in addition to the regularly scheduled principal payments. The Company ~~has not included that excess cash flow payment in current maturities of long term debt at December 31, 2008, as the Company~~ was not required to make that payment in January 2009 in order to maintain compliance with other provisions of the debt agreement.

Revolving Promissory Note

The Company has a revolving promissory note with the same lending institution for up to $11,881,250. The Company pays interest on the principal advances monthly at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 34% which totaled 5.2025% at ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2008~~2009. In accordance with an amendment to the loan agreement discussed below, beginning May 15, 2009, the minimum rate of interest on variable rate borrowings under the revolving promissory note will not be less than 5%. Beginning in September 2015, or three months after the repayment of the term note described above, the Company is required to make 10 quarterly installments of $1,~~118~~188,125, to the extent of the ~~principal~~principle balance outstanding, plus accrued ~~interest~~ ~~until December 1, 2017. The Company pays a commitment fee of .5% on the unused portion of the revolving promissory note.~~

~~The term note, the revolving promissory note and the line of credit described in Note 6 are subject~~10 to a common credit agreement containing various financial and non-financial covenants that, among other things, limit cash distributions and capital expenditures, require minimum debt service coverage, net worth and working capital levels. As of December 31, 2008, the Company was out of compliance with the minimum working capital covenant in the credit agreement. In addition, based on its projections of operating results through September 30, 2009, the Company reasonably anticipated that it would not be in

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009

~~compliance~~interest ~~with~~until ~~the debt service coverage ratio as of September~~December 301, ~~2009~~2017. The ~~lending institution~~Company ~~waived~~pays ~~compliance~~a ~~with~~commitment ~~the~~fee ~~minimum working capital covenant at December 31, 2008 and has modified the terms~~ of ~~the credit agreement to reduce the minimum working capital requirement from $6,000,000 to $4,000,000 beginning January 31, 2009~~0. ~~At September 30, 2009 and thereafter, the minimum working capital requirement will increase to $~~5~~,000,000.~~% ~~For purposes~~on of the ~~credit agreement, working capital is defined as current assets, plus any~~ unused borrowing capacity under the revolving promissory note, less current liabilities. The lending institution also agreed to eliminate the debt coverage ratio requirement for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009. In connection with the waiver and the amendments to the credit agreement, the interest rate on the variable portion of the Company’s borrowings for the remaining term of the credit agreement was increased from 3% over the three-month LIBOR rate to 4% over the three-month LIBOR rate. The Company anticipates that it will be able to comply with all covenants in the credit agreement for the remainder of 2009 based on its current projections of operating results. However, it is at least reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those projections; which include among other things, management estimates, assumptions, and weighted probabilities for anticipated corn, ethanol, natural gas, and distillers grains prices, cash flows, and production rates. If the Company is not in compliance with its credit agreement covenants, the lending institution may enforce its available remedies against the Company. Among other things, borrowings under the term note, revolving promissory note ~~and the line of credit are secured by a first priority security interest on all of the Company’s business assets~~.

The term note, the revolving promissory note and the line of credit described in Note 6 are subject to a common credit agreement containing various financial and non-financial covenants that, among other things, limit cash distributions and capital expenditures, and require minimum debt service coverage, net worth and working capital levels. The lending institution modified the terms of the credit agreement to reduce the minimum working capital requirement from $6,000,000 to $4,000,000 beginning January 31, 2009. However, as of March 31, 2009, the Company was out of compliance with the amended minimum working capital covenant and obtained a waiver from the lending institution of this noncompliance. The lending institution also agreed to further reduce the minimum working capital requirement from $4,000,000 to $2,750,000 effective April 1, 2009. On December 31, 2009 the minimum working capital requirement will increase to $3,500,000 through December 30, 2010, after which the minimum working capital requirement will increase to $5,000,000. For purposes of the credit agreement, working capital is defined as current assets, plus any unused borrowing capacity under the revolving promissory note, less current liabilities. In addition, based on its projections of operating results through March 31, 2010, the Company reasonably anticipated that it would not be in compliance with the debt service coverage ratio and minimum tangible net worth covenants. The lending institution agreed to eliminate the debt coverage ratio requirement for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009. The tangible net worth requirement was reduced from $36,800,000 to $35,500,000 effective April 1, 2009. On December 31, 2009, the minimum tangible net worth requirement will increase to $36,250,000 through December 30, 2010, after which it will increase to $37,750,000. Capital expenditures during fiscal years 2008 and 2009 are limited to a total of $2,500,000 for the two year period. Thereafter, capital expenditures are limited to $500,000 per year. The amendment also prohibits distribution of earnings without prior written consent of the lender through September 30, 2010.

With the forgoing modifications, the Company anticipates that it will be able to comply with all the covenants in the credit agreement through March 31, 2010, based on its current projection of operating results. However, it is at least reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those projections; which include among other things, management estimates, assumptions, and weighted probabilities for anticipated corn, ethanol, natural gas, and distillers grains prices, cash flows, and production rates and efficiencies. If the Company is not in compliance with its credit agreement covenants, the lending institution may enforce its available remedies against the Company. Among other things, borrowings under the term note, revolving promissory note and the line of credit are secured by a first priority security interest on all of the Company’s business assets. In addition, the lending institution may limit additional advances under the credit agreement in the event it determines there has been an event, occurrence or circumstance that has a material negative effect on the Company’s business operations or prospects.

In connection with the waivers and the amendments to the credit agreement, the interest rate on the variable portion of the Company’s borrowings for the remaining term of the credit agreement was increased from 3% over the three-month LIBOR to 4% over the three-month LIBOR rate, but shall not, in any event, be less than 5%. The amendments to the credit agreement also eliminated the provision that would have lowered the interest rate on the term note and the revolving promissory note to 2.85% above the three-month LIBOR rate after a year end in which the Company’s ratio of net worth to total tangible assets exceeds 60% and the Company was not in default under the terms of the credit agreement.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

March 31, 2009

Maturities

The estimated maturities of long-term debt at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, are as follows:

2009	$	3,751,503
2010	$	4,940,038
2010		4,931,945
2011		4,921,157
2011		4,927,500
2012		4,927,500
2012		4,947,500
2013		4,947,500
2013		4,967,500
2014		4,967,500
Thereafter		810,~~932~~012,~~545~~355
Total long-term debt	$	3234,~~458~~716,~~493~~050

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Purchase Commitments

The Company has forward fixed price and basis contracts in place for corn purchases of approximately $1413,~~768~~427,000, which under full production, represents approximately 1925% and 108% of the Company’s anticipated purchases through September 2009 and 2010, respectively. The Company has forward sales contracts in place for the sale of modified wet distillers grain of approximately $107,~~334~~722,000 through September 2009, which represents approximately 7691% of the Company’s estimated wet distillers grain sales over the period. The Company also has forward sales contracts in place for the sale of dry distillers grain of approximately $~~721~~571,000 through September 2009, which represents approximately 1716% of the Company’s estimated dry distillers grain sales over the period.

9Currently, some of the forward corn contract prices are above current market prices for corn. Given declining corn and ethanol prices and the corresponding margins, upon taking delivery under these contracts, the Company would incur a loss. The Company had accrued losses on these purchase commitments of approximately $136,000 at March 31, 2009. Losses on purchase commitments are recorded in the lower of cost or market adjustment on the statement of operations. This amount includes losses of approximately $63,000 and $508,000 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009. The amount of the loss was determined by applying a methodology similar to that used in the lower of cost or market evaluation with respect to inventory. Given the uncertainty of future corn and ethanol prices, this loss may not be recovered, and further losses on the outstanding purchase commitments could be recorded in future periods.

SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements

~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009

Currently, some of the forward corn contract prices are above current market prices for corn. Given declining corn and ethanol prices and the corresponding margins, upon taking delivery under these contracts the Company would incur a loss. The Company had accrued losses on these purchase commitments of approximately $637,000 at December 31, 2008. This amount includes approximately $193,000 of losses accrued at September 30, 2008 along with additional losses of approximately $444,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Losses on purchase commitments are recorded in the lower of cost or market adjustment on the statement of operations. The amount of the loss was determined by applying a methodology similar to that used in the lower of cost or market evaluation with respect to inventory. Given the uncertainty of future corn and ethanol prices, this loss may not be recovered, and further losses on the outstanding purchase commitments could be recorded in future periods.

Corn Oil Extraction Contract

During May 2008, the Company entered into a contract for the design and installation of a corn oil extraction system at the Company’s production facility. The total cost of the contract is approximately $1,200,000. Through December 31, 2008, the Company had incurred costs of approximately $947,000 included with construction in progress. In December 2008, the Company began extracting corn oil using temporary equipment with installation of the permanent equipment completed in February 2009.

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related party transactions during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, consisted of ~~corn~~ corn purchases from, and sales of distillers grains to, persons who are significant unit holders and/or directors of the Company. All these transactions were on the same terms and conditions extended to unaffiliated parties. The approximate amounts of such transactions are set forth below for the three and six months ended ~~December~~March 31:

	2008		2007
Three Months Ended	2009		2008
Corn purchases	$	~~815~~1,051,000	$	~~552~~773,000
Distillers grain sales		~~338~~250,000		~~189~~246,000


Six Months Ended	2009		2008
Corn purchases	$	1,803,000	$	1,327,000
Distillers grain sales		587,000		436,000

10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On May 1, 2009, the Company entered into an Ethanol Product Off-Take Agreement (the “Ethanol Agreement”) with Gavilon LLC (“Gavilon”) and terminated its prior ethanol marketing agreement with Archer Daniels Midland. Under the Ethanol Agreement, Gavilon is obligated to bid on 100% of the Company’s annual production of fuel ethanol up to 60 million gallons per year and the Company is obligated to consider all such bids, subject to the right of the Company to retain up to 600,000 gallons of ethanol per month for sales to third parties. Gavilon will pay all transportation costs associated with the ethanol sold under the Ethanol Agreement. However, to the extent Gavilon maintains a dedicated fleet of railcars to be used to transport ethanol sold by the Company, the Company has agreed to be responsible for the net leasing cost incurred by Gavilon (including in-service freight and mileage equalization costs) for these dedicated railcars. The Company and Gavilon will confer at least annually to determine the number of railcars needed to transport ethanol from the Company’s plant. Gavilon will invoice the Company monthly for such railcar leasing costs.

The Ethanol Agreement has an initial term of one year, but may be extended for up to three additional one-year terms by mutual agreement of the parties. Either party may terminate the Ethanol Agreement without cause at any time upon 90 days written notice. If the Company terminates the Ethanol Agreement without cause, it will remain responsible for any railcar leasing costs incurred by Gavilon through the remainder of the current term of the Ethanol Agreement.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

We prepared the following discussion and analysis to help you better understand our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, and results of operations for the three-~~month~~ ~~period~~and six-month periods ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, notes and the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ~~ended~~ ended September 30, 2008. Our results of operations for the three ~~month~~and six months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2009 ~~2008~~ are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations we may experience for the full fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 or any other future period.

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report on Form 10-Q, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains a number of forward-looking statements that relate to future events and our expectations regarding future performance or conditions. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “future,” “intend,” “could,” “hope,” “predict,” “target,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. These forward-looking statements, and others we make from time to time, are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. While it is impossible to identify all such risk factors, some that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those that we anticipate in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

	•		Changes in the availability and costs of products and raw materials, particularly corn and natural gas;

	•		Changes in the production capacity of the ethanol industry, advances in ethanol technologies and other competitive factors;

	•		Fluctuations in the price and market for ethanol and distillers grains;

	•		Financial impact of our hedging strategies;

	•		Our ability to market and our reliance on third parties to market our products;

	•		Changes in plant production capacity, variations in actual ethanol and distillers grains production from expectations or technical difficulties in operating the plant;

	•		Changes in interest rates and the availability of credit to support capital improvements and operations;

	•		Changes in or elimination of governmental mandates for the use of ethanol or other laws, tariffs, trade or other controls or enforcement practices affecting the ethanol markets;

	•		Fluctuations in U.S. petroleum consumption and in petroleum and gasoline prices;

	•		The availability and adequacy of cash flow to meet our working capital requirements;

	•		Competition from alternative fuels and alternative fuel additives;

	•		Changes in general economic conditions or the occurrence of certain events causing an economic impact in the agriculture, oil or automobile industries;

	•		Lack of transport, storage and blending infrastructure preventing ethanol from reaching markets;

	•		The loss of, or inability to obtain, any license or permit needed to operate our plant;

	•		The loss of available loan funding due to our inability to comply with loan covenants;

	•		Unanticipated liability resulting from litigation or regulatory actions.

The cautionary statements referred to in this section also should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that may be issued by us or persons acting on our behalf. We do not undertake any duty to update forward-looking statements after the date they are

1114

~~our behalf. We do not undertake any duty to update forward-looking statements after the date they are~~ made or to conform them to actual results or to changes in circumstances or expectations. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we currently expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Overview

We operate a single dry mill corn-based ethanol plant near Jackson, Nebraska with a stated capacity to produce 50 million gallons of denatured fuel grade ethanol and 160,000 tons of dried distillers grains per year (the “Plant”). Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of ethanol and distillers grains (“DGs”). We also began the extraction of corn oil in December 2008 and expect to produce approximately 17.5 million ~~gallons~~pounds of corn oil per year if the Plant is operating at its stated capacity. The Plant was completed and full scale production of ethanol and DGs began in May 2007. We have operated the Plant at substantially full capacity since that time. However, we continually evaluate production levels in light of market conditions and there is no assurance that we will ~~be able to~~ continue to operate the Plant at ~~these production~~substantially ~~levels~~full capacity in future periods. Due to current market conditions in the ethanol industry, the Company is not currently pursuing its previously announced plans to expand the Plant’s productive capacity from 50 million to 100 million gallons per year.

As We ~~discussed~~realized innegative ~~our~~operating ~~report~~margins onand ~~Form~~cash ~~10-K~~flows ~~for~~and a net loss during the ~~year~~first ~~ended~~half ~~September 30,~~of fiscal ~~2008,~~2009 as a ~~variety~~result of ~~factors~~ ~~affect~~falling ~~our~~ethanol ~~revenues~~prices, ~~costs~~comparatively high cost of ~~production~~goods sold, and derivative ~~operating income~~losses. Our operating results are largely driven by the prices at which we sell ethanol and DGs and the costs related to their production, particularly the prices of corn and natural gas which are the two largest components of our production costs. Ethanol, DGs, corn and natural gas are commodities and their market prices are influenced by supply and demand and a number of other factors over which we have no control. The prices of ethanol, corn and natural gas have been extremely volatile during the past ~~twelve~~ eighteen months and we expect to see continuing fluctuations in these prices during the remainder of fiscal 2009. During ~~2008 ethanol prices moved up and down with changes in~~ the ~~prices~~summer of ~~corn.~~2008, ~~The~~the prices on the Chicago Board of Trade for ethanol reached a high of $2.95 per gallon, the price of corn ~~reached~~ reached $7.62 per bushel, and natural gas reached a price of $13.69 per decatherms (“Dth”) ~~during the summer of 2008~~. Prices of these commodities ~~then~~have ~~fell~~fallen significantly ~~during~~from that time. During the ~~remainder~~six ofmonths ended March 31, ~~2008~~2009, ~~with~~the ~~ethanol~~average ~~hitting~~price aat ~~low~~which ofwe sold ethanol was $1.3747 per gallon~~, corn to $2~~.90 ~~per~~Our ~~bushel,~~average ~~and~~ethanol ~~natural~~sale price ~~gas~~fell to $51.2138 per ~~Dth.~~gallon ~~Since~~during wethe ~~sell~~three ~~ethanol~~months atended ~~current market prices~~March 31, ~~the~~2009. The decline in ethanol prices ~~had~~significantly ~~a downward~~reduced ~~effect on~~ our revenues during the first ~~quarter~~half of fiscal 2009. While we ~~anticipate~~ anticipate continued demand for ethanol due to a number of factors discussed in our report on Form 10-K, the downturn in the U.S. economy ishas ~~expected~~reduced ~~to reduce~~ the demand for motor fuels generally. This has resulted in a significant decline in the price of unleaded gasoline in U.S. markets ~~which~~and ~~puts~~lower ~~downward pressure on~~ ethanol ~~demand and~~ prices. Lower ethanol prices ~~are~~may ~~expected to~~ continue in the near-term, and we expect to see continuing fluctuations in ethanol prices ~~over~~into the ~~next year~~future.

The negative effect of lower ethanol revenues on our gross profits have been lessened by the reduction in corn and natural gas prices since the summer of 2008. The average closing market price of corn for the lead month futures on the Chicago Board of Trade during the three and six months ended March 31, 2009 was $3.76 and $3.80, respectively. However, our average price of corn during these periods was $3.81 and $4.28 per bushel as a result of corn that we acquired under forward purchase contracts. As part of our corn procurement strategy, we enter into forward price purchase contracts with local farmers and elevators to help ensure an adequate supply of corn to operate the Plant. These contracts allow us to purchase corn at its then market price but provide for actual delivery of a majority of the contracted corn from three to nine months in the future. ~~We use futures and option contracts to minimize our exposure to movements in corn and natural gas prices, but there is no assurance that these hedging strategies will be effective.~~ As a result of entering into forward contracts while corn prices were higher earlier in 2008, we were obligated to purchase corn at prices that exceeded ~~market prices of corn at the time of delivery to the Plant during the first~~ ~~quarter of fiscal 2009. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009,~~

1215

market prices of corn at the ~~average~~time ~~price~~of wedelivery ~~paid~~to ~~for~~the ~~corn~~Plant ~~was~~during ~~approximately~~the $1first half of fiscal 2009.02 ~~per~~We ~~bushel~~use ~~above~~futures and option contracts to mitigate our ~~average~~exposure ~~cash bid~~to ~~for~~movements in corn ~~during~~and natural ~~the~~gas ~~period~~prices, ~~largely~~but ~~due~~there tois ~~these~~no ~~forward~~assurance ~~purchase~~that ~~contracts.~~these Inhedging ~~addition~~strategies are, ~~the~~or will be, effective. The decline in corn and natural gas prices also decreased the market value of existing corn and gas hedge contracts we own. WeBecause none of our hedging contracts were designated as cash flow or fair value hedges, declines in the market value of these contracts were recognized as losses in our results of operations. Accordingly, we recorded losses of approximately $56.75 million in our hedging contracts as additional costs of goods sold during the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2009. ~~2008~~However, ~~with~~$5.7 million of these losses occurred during the ~~large~~first quarter of fiscal 2009 with a majority of ~~these~~those losses attributable to our corn hedging contracts.

We ~~realized~~continue ~~negative~~to ~~operating~~take ~~margins~~steps ~~and~~to ~~cash~~reduce ~~flows~~our ~~during~~exposure ~~the~~to ~~first~~negative ~~quarter~~margins ofincluding ~~fiscal~~but ~~2009~~not limited asto areducing ~~result~~overhead ofexpenses, ~~falling~~taking ~~ethanol~~various ~~prices,~~measures ~~comparatively~~to ~~high~~maximize ~~cost~~production ofefficiencies, ~~goods~~and making ~~sold,~~adjustments in our hedging and ~~derivative~~risk ~~losses of~~management $5strategies.~~7 million.~~ WeIn ~~continue~~addition, towe ~~take~~recently ~~steps~~engaged an outside consultant to ~~limit~~assist us in assessing our ~~exposure~~risk tomanagement ~~negative~~strategies. ~~margins~~Effective ~~while~~May 1, 2009, we ~~grind through~~terminated our ~~higher~~ethanol ~~priced~~marketing ~~forward~~agreement ~~corn~~with ~~purchases~~Archer Daniels Midland (“ADM”) and entered into a new ethanol marketing agreement with Gavilon, LLC. WeThe ~~also~~new ~~are~~ethanol ~~taking~~marketing ~~steps~~agreement is expected to ~~reduce~~provide management with more transparent ethanol pricing information, better control over operating margins and an improved ability to market our ~~overhead~~ethanol, including selling to local ~~expenses~~markets. By the end of our second quarter of fiscal 2009, ~~and~~we ~~other~~have ~~costs~~used ina ~~light~~majority of the ~~market~~higher priced ~~conditions~~corn inthat ~~which~~ we ~~are~~contracted ~~currently~~in ~~operating~~2008. This, in conjunction with other steps mentioned above, has ~~Despite~~substantially ~~these~~reduced ~~efforts~~our negative gross margins in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the ~~reduce~~first ~~costs~~quarter ~~and~~of ~~conserve~~fiscal ~~working~~2009. ~~capital~~Although, we still realized a ~~substantial~~ net loss during the quarter ended ~~December~~ March 31, ~~2008~~2009 and a decline in working capital.; these declines were substantially less than in the previous quarter.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the three month periods ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008. The following table shows the results of our operations for the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008.

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2008						December 31, 2007
	March 31, 2009						March 31, 2008
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
				% of						% of
Statement of Operations Data	Amount			Revenues			Amount			Revenues
Revenues	$	2420,~~456~~540,~~854~~463			100.0	%	$	2732,~~006~~625,~~062~~878			100.0	%
Cost of Goods Sold		3220,~~812~~783,~~291~~551			~~134~~101.2	%		1822,~~988~~065,~~137~~228			7067.36	%
Gross Profit (Loss)		(8243,~~355,437~~088	)		(341.2	)%		810,~~017~~560,~~925~~650			2932.74	%
SG&A Expenses		~~722~~435,~~814~~283			32.01	%		~~713~~438,~~894~~068			21.74	%
Operating Income (loss)		(9678,~~078,251~~371	)		(373.23	)%		710,~~304~~122,~~031~~582			2731.0	%
Other Expense, net		(~~572~~201,~~562~~722	)		(21.30	)%		(~~928~~547,~~188~~638	)		(31.47	)%
Net Income (loss)	$	(9880,~~650,813~~093	)		(394.53	)%	$	69,~~375~~574,~~843~~944			2329.63	%

Revenues. During the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, we sold approximately 1211.2 1 million gallons of ethanol for approximately $15.3 million comprising 7774.74% of our total revenues and approximately 3637,000 dry equivalent tons of distillers grains (“DGs”) ~~sales~~for approximately $5.0 million comprising 2224.3% of our total revenues. We ~~operated~~ ~~the~~also ~~Plant~~sold atapproximately ~~substantially~~416,000 ~~full~~pounds ~~capacity during the entire quarter. Although we began production~~ of corn oil ~~during~~for ~~December 2008~~approximately $65,000 ~~corn~~comprising ~~oil~~0.3% ~~sales~~of ~~during~~our ~~the~~total ~~quarter were not significant~~revenues. During the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007~~2008, we sold approximately 1214.93 million gallons of ethanol for approximately $27.9 million comprising 8285.56% of our total revenues and approximately 4542,000 dry equivalent ~~tons~~ tons of DGs ~~sales~~for ~~comprising~~approximately 17$4.5~~% of our total revenues. The 9.4% decrease in revenues for the three months ended December~~ ~~31, 2008 as compared to the same period in the previous year was due primarily to the 5.6% decrease in gallons of ethanol sold and a 9.7% decrease in the average sale price per gallon.~~ million

The volume of ethanol sold decreased during the three months ended December 31, 2008, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to a planned maintenance shutdown of the Plant in 2008. The average price per gallon of ethanol sold had fallen from $1.73 during the first quarter of fiscal 2008, to $1.56 during the first quarter of fiscal 2009. All sales of ethanol were 16

~~made~~comprising ~~pursuant~~13.7% of our total revenues. No corn oil was produced at the Plant during the three months ended March 31, 2008. The 37.0% decrease in overall revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the ~~terms~~same period in the previous fiscal year was due primarily to a 45.3% decrease in our ethanol revenues. The decrease in ethanol revenues was due to a 22.4% decrease in gallons sold, in conjunction with a 29.4% decrease in the average sale price per gallon of ethanol. The decrease in gallon sold was a result of reduced production rates in an effort to maximize production efficiencies due to limited grind margins. The average price per gallon of ethanol ~~marketing~~sold ~~agreement~~had ~~that~~fallen wefrom ~~entered~~$1.95 ~~into~~during ~~with~~the ~~Archer~~second quarter of fiscal 2008, to $1.38 during the ~~Daniels~~second ~~Midland~~quarter Coof fiscal 2009. All sales of ethanol during both periods were made pursuant to the terms of the ADM ethanol marketing agreement.

~~The decrease~~On inMay 1, ~~ethanol~~2009, ~~revenue~~the ~~was~~Company ~~partially~~entered ~~offset~~into byan aEthanol ~~15.7%~~Agreement ~~increase~~with inGavilon ~~revenues~~and ~~from~~terminated ~~the~~it ~~sale~~prior ofethanol ~~DGs~~marketing agreement with ADM. ~~Although~~Under ~~there~~the ~~was~~Ethanol aAgreement, ~~decrease~~Gavilon inis ~~tons~~obligated ofto bid ~~DGs~~on ~~sold~~100% inof ~~first~~the ~~quarter~~Company’s annual production of ~~fiscal~~fuel ~~2009 compared~~ethanol up to 60 million gallons per year and the ~~first~~Company ~~quarter~~is ofobligated ~~fiscal~~to ~~2008~~consider all such bids, asubject ~~41.3%~~to ~~increase~~the inright of the ~~average~~Company ~~price~~to retain up to 600,000 gallons of ethanol per ~~ton received~~month for ~~DGs~~sales ~~during~~to ~~the~~third ~~first~~parties. ~~quarter~~This ofnew ~~fiscal~~marketing agreement ~~2009~~allows ~~compared~~management to ~~the~~better ~~first~~match ~~quarter~~purchases of ~~fiscal 2008,~~corn ~~resulted~~and innatural ~~the~~gas ~~overall~~(our ~~increase~~two inlargest inputs) ~~DGs~~with ~~revenue.~~sales ~~Modified~~of ~~wet~~ethanol ~~DGs~~and ~~are~~distillers ~~sold~~grains. toThis ~~end~~information ~~users~~allows inus to better manage ~~the~~our ~~local~~grind ~~market~~margins atand ~~fluctuating~~reduces ~~market~~our ~~prices~~price ~~and~~risk ~~represented~~exposure. ~~approximately~~It ~~71%~~also ofgives ~~DGs~~management ~~sales.~~more Wemarketing ~~use~~opportunities, ~~forward~~including ~~contracts~~the ability to ~~lock~~sell inour aethanol ~~portion~~locally, ofwhich ~~the~~we ~~anticipated~~were ~~sales~~not ofable ~~distillers~~to ~~grains~~do under our prior ethanol marketing agreement.

~~Cost~~The ofdecrease ~~Goods~~in ~~Sold.~~ethanol ~~Our~~revenue ~~cost~~was ofpartially ~~goods~~offset ~~sold~~by ~~include,~~a ~~among~~11.2% ~~other~~increase ~~things,~~in ~~the~~revenues ~~cost~~from ofthe ~~corn~~sale ~~and~~of ~~natural~~DGs. ~~gas,~~Although ~~processing~~there ~~ingredients,~~was ~~electricity,~~a ~~salaries~~decrease ~~and~~in ~~benefits~~dry ofequivalent ~~production personnel,~~tons ~~Plant~~of ~~maintenance~~DGs ~~expense~~sold ~~and~~in ~~depreciation~~second ~~expense.~~quarter ~~In addition, gains or losses on~~of ~~derivative~~fiscal ~~instruments~~2009 ~~that~~compared ~~we use~~ to ~~hedge~~ the ~~price~~second quarter of ~~corn~~fiscal ~~and~~2008, ~~natural~~a ~~gas~~27.0% ~~and~~increase ~~changes~~in to the ~~carrying~~ ~~value~~average ofprice per ~~our~~dry ~~inventories~~equivalent ~~affect~~ton ~~our~~received ~~costs~~for ofDGs ~~goods~~during ~~sold.~~the ~~Although~~second wequarter ~~produced~~of ~~and~~fiscal ~~sold less~~2009 ~~ethanol~~compared ~~and~~to ~~DGs during~~ the second quarter ~~ended~~of ~~December 31,~~fiscal 2008, ~~than~~resulted wein ~~did during~~ the ~~quarter ended~~overall ~~December 31,~~increase ~~2007,~~in ~~our~~DGs ~~costs~~revenue. ofModified ~~goods~~wet DGs are sold ~~increased~~to bycustomers ~~$13.8 million~~in ~~or 72.8% during~~ the ~~quarter~~ ~~ended~~local ~~December 31,~~market ~~2008,~~under ~~compared~~contracted ~~with~~or ~~the~~current ~~quarter~~market ~~ended~~prices ~~December 31,~~and ~~2007~~represented approximately 66.5% ~~Our cost~~ of ~~goods~~ ~~sold~~DGs ~~exceeded~~sales. ~~our~~Dry ~~total~~DGs ~~revenues~~are ~~during~~sold ~~the~~to ~~first~~local ~~quarter~~customers ofor ~~fiscal~~to ~~2009~~Cenex ~~resulting~~Harvest inStates under a ~~negative~~ ~~gross~~marketing ~~margin~~agreement. ofWe ~~$8.4 million~~use ~~compared~~forward contracts to alock ~~gross~~in ~~profit~~a portion of ~~$8.0 million during~~ the ~~first~~anticipated ~~quarter~~sales of ~~fiscal~~distillers ~~2008~~grains.

~~The~~Cost ~~increase~~of inGoods Sold. Our cost of goods sold ~~during~~include, ~~the~~among ~~first~~other ~~quarter~~things, ofthe ~~fiscal~~cost ~~2009 resulted primarily~~of ~~from~~corn ~~hedging losses~~ and ~~higher~~natural ~~average~~gas, ~~costs~~processing ~~per~~ingredients, ~~bushel~~electricity, ofsalaries ~~corn~~and ~~during~~benefits ~~the~~of ~~quarter. We incurred~~production ~~losses~~personnel, ofPlant ~~approximately~~maintenance ~~$5.6 million~~expense ~~from~~and ~~corn~~depreciation ~~derivative~~expense. ~~instruments~~In ~~during~~addition, ~~the~~gains ~~first~~or ~~quarter~~losses ofon ~~fiscal~~derivative ~~2009~~instruments ~~compared~~that towe ~~approximately~~use ~~$3.7 million~~to inhedge ~~gains~~the ~~during~~price ~~the~~of ~~first~~corn ~~quarter~~and ofnatural ~~fiscal 2008.~~gas ~~This~~and ~~resulted~~changes into anthe carrying ~~additional~~value ~~approximate~~of ~~$9.3 million~~our ~~increase~~inventories inaffect our ~~cost~~costs of goods sold. ~~The~~ ~~losses~~Although onwe ~~these~~produced ~~corn~~and ~~derivative~~sold less ~~instruments~~ethanol ~~were~~and ~~primarily~~DGs aduring ~~result~~the ofquarter ~~corn~~ended ~~prices~~March 31, ~~falling since~~2009, ~~the~~than ~~dates~~ we ~~entered~~did ~~into~~during ~~these~~the ~~contracts.~~quarter ~~As of December~~ended March 31, 2008, ~~none of~~ our ~~derivative contracts~~costs ~~were~~of ~~designated~~goods assold ~~cash~~only ~~flow~~decreased orby ~~fair~~approximately ~~value hedges~~$1.3 million. AsHowever aas ~~result, changes to the market~~a ~~value~~percentage of ~~these~~sales, ~~contracts were recognized during the quarter as an increase to~~ our ~~costs~~cost of goods sold. ~~During~~increased ~~the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we paid an average of $4~~33.646% ~~per~~primarily ~~bushel~~a ofresult ~~corn compared to $3.57 per bushel~~ of ~~corn during~~ the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~45. ~~This contributed to~~3% ~~the~~decrease ~~approximate $4.7 million increase~~ in our ~~cost~~ethanol ofrevenues. ~~corn~~Due ~~as compared~~ to the ~~first~~low ~~quarter~~prices of ~~fiscal~~ ~~2008.~~ethanol Inand ~~addition~~comparatively high input costs, our cost of goods sold ~~for~~exceeded our total revenues during the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2009 ~~as compared to~~ ~~fiscal~~resulting ~~2008~~in ~~increased as~~ a ~~result~~negative ofgross ~~the~~margin ~~recognition~~ of ~~a loss of~~ approximately $~~444~~243,000 onas ~~forward corn~~compared ~~price~~to ~~purchase contracts as~~ a ~~result~~gross profit of approximately a$10.6 million ~~determination~~during ~~that~~ the ~~market~~second ~~value~~quarter of ~~these contracts~~fiscal ~~was less than their cost basis~~2008.

~~Conversely,~~The ~~the~~total ~~average~~cost ~~price~~ of ~~natural~~corn ~~gas~~ used ~~at the Plant~~ during the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2009 decreased approximately $7.1 million which was 832.30% less than ~~during~~in the ~~first~~same quarter of ~~fiscal~~the ~~2008~~previous year. InThis ~~addition,~~was wea ~~supplement~~result ~~our~~of ~~natural~~a ~~gas~~13.7% ~~requirements~~decrease ~~with~~in ~~methane~~the ~~generated~~price atper abushel ~~landfill~~paid ~~located~~for ~~near~~corn ~~the~~in ~~Plant.~~conjunction ~~During the~~with ~~quarter~~a ~~ended~~21.1% ~~December 31,~~reduction ~~2008,~~in our weusage ~~purchased~~of ~~approximately~~corn. ~~28,000~~During ~~Dths~~the ofsecond ~~methane~~quarter ~~gas~~of ~~from~~fiscal ~~the landfill~~2009, ~~which~~including ~~represented~~the ~~approximately~~net ~~8.6%~~effects of ~~our~~lower ~~gas~~of cost ~~usage~~or ~~for~~market ~~the~~adjustments ~~quarter~~to corn, atour an average ~~price~~ ofcost was $43.7569 per ~~Dth.~~bushel ~~This~~of corn compared to an$4.42 per ~~average~~bushel ~~price~~ of ~~$6.74~~corn ~~per~~during ~~Dth~~the ~~for~~second ~~natural~~quarter ~~gas purchased~~of in the ~~same~~prior ~~period~~fiscal year.

WeSimilarly, ~~use~~the ~~futures~~average ~~and~~price ~~option~~of ~~contracts to help mitigate our exposure to movements in corn and~~ natural gas ~~prices;~~used ~~but~~at ~~there~~the isPlant noduring ~~assurance~~the ~~that~~second ~~these~~quarter ~~hedging~~of fiscal ~~strategies~~2009 ~~will~~was ~~be effective~~39.4% ~~As market~~less ~~conditions~~than ~~change,~~during ~~gains~~the orsecond ~~losses~~quarter ~~may occur from derivatives in place as~~ of ~~December 31, 2008,~~fiscal ~~and will have an effect on subsequent periods~~2008. In addition, ~~gains or losses on derivative~~we ~~instruments~~supplement doour ~~not~~natural ~~necessarily~~gas ~~coincide~~requirements with ~~the~~methane ~~related~~generated ~~corn~~at ora ~~natural~~landfill ~~gas~~located ~~purchases.~~near ~~This may~~the ~~cause~~Plant. ~~substantial~~During ~~fluctuations~~the inquarter ~~cost~~ended ofMarch 31, ~~goods~~2009, ~~sold~~we ~~from~~purchased ~~period~~approximately to27,000 ~~period.~~Dths ~~While~~of ~~we do not use~~methane ~~hedge~~gas ~~accounting~~from tothe ~~match~~landfill, which

1417

~~gains~~represented orapproximately ~~losses~~8.3% onof ~~derivative~~our ~~instruments,~~gas weusage ~~believe~~for the ~~derivative~~quarter, ~~instruments~~at ~~provide~~an average purchase price of $4.75 per Dth. This compared to an average purchase price of $5.10 per Dth for natural gas ~~economic~~purchased ~~hedge~~in the same period.

~~Selling~~However, ~~General~~we ~~and~~incurred ~~Administrative~~losses ~~Expenses.~~of ~~Selling~~approximately $780,000 ~~general~~from ~~and~~corn ~~administrative~~derivative instruments during ~~(“SG&A”)~~the ~~expenses~~second ~~included~~quarter ~~salaries~~of ~~and~~fiscal ~~benefits~~2009 ofcompared ~~administrative~~to ~~employees,~~approximately ~~insurance,~~$7.7 million in gains during the second ~~professional~~quarter ~~fees~~of ~~and~~fiscal ~~other~~2008. ~~general~~This ~~administrative~~resulted in additional costs of approximately $8.4 million ~~These~~in ~~expenses~~our cost ~~generally~~of dogoods ~~not~~sold ~~vary~~during ~~with~~ the ~~level~~second quarter of ~~production~~fiscal at2009 as compare to the ~~Plant~~second quarter of fiscal 2008. ~~While~~The losses on these corn derivative instruments were primarily a result of corn prices falling since the dates we ~~saw~~entered into these contracts. During the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, none of our derivative contracts were designated as cash flow or fair value hedges. As a ~~slight~~result, changes to the market value of these contracts were recognized during the quarter as an increase inor decrease to our ~~overall~~costs ~~SG&A~~of ~~expenses~~goods sold. In addition, cost of goods sold for the second quarter of ~~1.3%~~fiscal ~~from~~2009, ~~period~~as compared to ~~period~~the second quarter of fiscal 2008, increased as a result of the ~~percentage~~recognition of ~~revenues~~lower ~~increased~~of cost or market adjustments totaling approximately $207,000 related to 3inventory and accrued losses on forward corn price purchase contracts, as a result of a determination that the market value of the inventory and of these contracts were less than their cost basis.0% ~~for~~This was a decrease from the ~~quarter~~lower ~~ending~~of cost or market ~~December 31~~adjustment of $871,000 ~~2008~~recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, primarily due to athe ~~decrease~~reduced number inof ~~revenues~~bushels ~~from~~of ~~ethanol~~corn ~~sales~~purchased under forward corn contracts above current market prices.

~~Other~~We ~~Expense.~~use ~~Other~~futures ~~expense~~and ~~consists~~option ~~primarily~~contracts ofto ~~interest~~help ~~expense~~mitigate on our ~~borrowings of~~exposure ~~approximately~~to ~~$583,000~~movements in corn and natural ~~$947,000~~gas ~~during~~prices; ~~the~~but ~~three~~there ~~months~~is ~~ended~~no ~~December 31,~~assurance ~~2008~~that ~~and~~these ~~2007, respectively.~~hedging ~~Interest~~strategies ~~expense~~will ~~consisted~~be ~~primarily~~effective. ofAs market ~~interest~~conditions ~~payments~~change, ongains ~~our~~or ~~credit~~losses ~~facilities with~~may ~~Farm~~occur ~~Credit~~from ~~Services~~derivatives in place as of ~~America~~March 31, ~~FLCA~~2009, and ~~described~~will ~~below~~have an effect on subsequent periods. ~~Interest~~In ~~expense~~addition, ~~also~~gains ~~included~~or ~~interest payments~~losses on ~~our~~derivative instruments ~~Tax~~do ~~Increment~~not ~~Revenue~~necessarily ~~Bonds~~coincide ~~and~~with onthe arelated ~~note~~corn ~~used~~or tonatural ~~finance~~gas ~~certain equipment~~purchases. This may ~~Overall~~cause ~~our~~substantial ~~interest~~fluctuations ~~costs~~in ~~have~~cost ~~declined~~of asgoods ~~interest~~sold ~~rates~~from ~~are~~period ~~lower~~to ~~and~~period. ~~the~~While ~~debt~~we ~~balances~~do ~~have~~not use ~~been~~hedge ~~paid~~accounting ~~down~~to inmatch ~~recent~~gains ~~months~~or losses on derivative instruments, we believe the derivative instruments provide an economic hedge.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses included salaries and benefits of administrative employees, insurance, professional fees and other general administrative costs. These expenses generally do not vary with the level of production at the Plant. While we saw a slight decrease in our SG&A expenses from period to period, the percentage of revenues increased to 2.1% for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 compared to 1.4% the quarter ended March 31, 2008, primarily due to a decrease in revenues from ethanol sales.

Other Income (Expense). Other expense consists primarily of interest expense on our borrowings of approximately $590,000 and $782,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest expense consisted primarily of interest payments on our credit facilities with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (“Farm Credit”) described below. Interest expense also included interest payments on our Tax Increment Revenue Bonds and on a note used to finance certain equipment. Overall our interest costs have declined due to lower average interest rates on that portion of our borrowings that bear interest at variable rates and lower debt balances during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to the same quarter of fiscal 2008. Other expenses were partially offset with patronage dividends earned from our lenders totaling approximately $321,000 and $206,000, for the quarters ending March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Comparison of the six-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The following table shows the results of our operations for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.


	Six Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	March 31, 2009						March 31, 2008
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
				% of						% of
Statement of Operations Data	Amount			Revenues			Amount			Revenues
Revenues	$	44,997,317			100.0	%	$	59,631,939			100.0	%
Cost of Goods Sold		53,900,829			119.8	%		41,204,002			69.1	%

Gross Profit (Loss)		(8,903,512	)		(19.8	)%		18,427,937			30.9	%
SG&A Expenses		843,602			1.9	%		942,667			1.6	%

Operating Income (loss)		(9,747,114	)		(21.7	)%		17,485,270			29.3	%
Other Expense, net		(783,792	)		(1.7	)%		(1,534,483	)		(2.5	)%


Net Income (loss)	$	(10,530,906	)		(23.4	)%	$	15,950,787			26.8	%

Revenues. During the six months ended March 31, 2009, we sold approximately 23.3 million gallons of ethanol for approximately $34.3 million comprising 76.2% of our total revenues, and approximately 73,000 dry equivalent tons of DGs for approximately $10.1 million comprising 22.4% of our total revenues. We also sold approximately 455,000 pounds of corn oil for approximately $69,800 comprising 0.2% of our total revenues. During the six months ended March 31, 2008, we sold approximately 27.2 million gallons of ethanol for approximately $50.2 million comprising 84.2% of our total revenues and approximately 87,000 dry equivalent tons of DGs sales for approximately $9.0 million comprising 15.0% of our total revenues. No corn oil was produced at the Plant during the six months ended March 31, 2008. The 24.5 % decrease in revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in the previous year was due primarily to a 31.7% decrease in our ethanol revenues. The decrease in ethanol revenues was due to a slow down in production rates resulting in a 14.4% decrease in gallons of ethanol sold in conjunction with a 20.2% decrease in the average sale price per gallon. The average price per gallon of ethanol sold had fallen from $1.85 during the first six months of fiscal 2008, to $1.47 during the first six months of fiscal 2009. All sales of ethanol during both periods were made pursuant to the terms of the ADM ethanol marketing agreement

The decrease in ethanol revenue was partially offset by a 12.6% increase in revenues from the sale of DGs. Although there was a decrease in tons of DGs sold in the first six months of fiscal 2009 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2008, a 34.0% increase in the average price per ton received for DGs during the first six months of fiscal 2009 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2008, resulted in the overall increase in DGs revenue. Modified wet DGs sales represented approximately 70.3% of our overall DGs sales.

Cost of Goods Sold. Although we produced and sold less ethanol and DGs during the six months ended March 31, 2009, than we did during the six months ended March 31, 2008, our costs of goods sold increased by $12.7 million or 30.8% during the six months ended March 31, 2009, compared with the six months ended March 31, 2008. This was primarily the result of a $17.7 million change in the amount of derivative gains and losses (discussed below), which increased the cost of goods sold from period to period; offset by an approximate $4.2 million decrease in the cost of corn used and an approximate $1.4 million decrease in the cost of natural gas. As a percentage of sales, our cost of goods sold increased 50.7% during the first half of fiscal 2009 compared to the first half of fiscal 2008. This was a result of the increase in the cost of goods sold in conjunction with a 31.7% decrease in our ethanol revenues from period to period. Our cost of goods sold exceeded our total revenues during the first six months of fiscal

2009 resulting in a negative gross margin of $8.9 million compared to a gross profit of $18.4 million during the first six months of fiscal 2008.

The increase in cost of goods sold during the first six months of fiscal 2009 resulted primarily from hedging losses during the period. We incurred losses of approximately $6.4 million from corn derivative instruments during the first six months of fiscal 2009 compared to approximately $11.3 million in gains during the first six months of fiscal 2008. This resulted in an additional approximate $17.7 million increase in our cost of goods sold during the first half of fiscal 2009 compare to the first half of fiscal 2008. The losses on these corn derivative instruments were primarily a result of corn prices falling since the dates we entered into these contracts. As of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, none of our derivative contracts were designated as cash flow or fair value hedges. As a result, changes to the market value of these contracts were recognized during the respective six month periods as a decrease or increase to our costs of goods sold.

During the first six months of fiscal 2009, including the net effects of lower of cost or market adjustments to corn, our average cost of corn was $4.08 per bushel, compared to $4.00 per bushel of corn during the first six months of fiscal 2008. This small increase in the net per bushel price of corn, offset with a 12.3% decrease in the usage of corn, resulted in a net decrease of approximately $4.2 million in our cost of corn as compared to the first six months of fiscal 2008.

The average price of natural gas used at the Plant during the first six months of fiscal 2009 was 24.9% less than during the first six months of fiscal 2008. In addition, we supplement our natural gas requirements with methane generated at a landfill located near the Plant. During the six months ended March 31, 2009, we purchased approximately 55,000 Dths of methane gas from the landfill, which represented approximately 8.5% of our gas usage for the period, at an average purchase price of $4.75 per Dth. This compared to an average purchase price of $5.92 per Dth for natural gas purchased in the same period.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses decreased approximately $99,000 during the six months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the six months ended March 31, 2008. SG&A expenses increased to 1.9% of total revenues for the six months ending March 31, 2009 compared to 1.6% for the six months ended March 31, 2008, primarily due to a decrease in revenues from ethanol sales.

Other Income (Expense). Other expense consists primarily of interest expense on our borrowings of approximately $1.2 million and $1.8 million during the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest expense consisted primarily of interest payments on our credit facilities with Farm Credit described below. Interest expense also included interest payments on our Tax Increment Revenue Bonds and on a note used to finance certain equipment. Overall our interest costs have declined due to lower average interest rates on that portion of our borrowings that bear interest at variable rates and to lower debt balances during the first six months of fiscal 2009 as compared to the first six months of fiscal 2008. Other expenses were partially offset with patronage dividends earned from our lenders totaling approximately $323,000 and $206,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009, current assets (excluding restricted cash) total approximately $6.5 7 million. ~~However, our cash balance at that date was zero.~~ Current liabilities at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~ 2009 totaled approximately $1210.59 million and included approximately $34.89 million of long-term debt obligations due within 12 months.

Our principal uses of cash are to pay operating expenses of the Plant and to make debt service payments on our long-term debt described below. NoOur ~~quarterly~~principal ~~installment~~sources ~~on the term credit facility was required this quarter because it was prepaid as~~ of ~~September 30,~~cash ~~2008.~~are ~~However,~~revenues wefrom ~~borrowed approximately $2.4 million under our revolving credit facility during~~ the ~~quarter~~sale inof ~~order to~~ethanol, ~~meet~~DGs ~~our~~and ~~working~~corn ~~capital~~oil ~~needs.~~and Weavailable ~~did~~borrowing ~~not~~capacity ~~make an annual “excess cash flow” payment of principal~~ under our ~~term~~Credit ~~loan~~ Facility with Farm ~~Credit of America, FLCA, in January 2009.~~

~~Our principal long-term debt obligations consist of borrowings under our Credit Facility with~~20 ~~Farm Credit Services of America FLCA (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility provides for:~~

(i) a term credit facility of $35,643,750 which we are obligated to repay in quarterly installments of $1,188,125 plus accrued interest with the final installment due in June 2015, subject to a requirement to make special principal payments out of excess cash flow in certain cases (the “Term Note”)

(ii) a revolving credit facility under which we may borrow up to $11,881,250 on a revolving basis as required to meet our working capital needs (the “Revolving Promissory Note”); and

(iii) a line of credit for up to $3,500,000 which we use primarily for grain hedging (the “Line of Credit”) through May 2009

As of December 31, 2008, the remaining principal on the Term Note was approximately $26.0 million. The daily average borrowing under the Revolving Promissory Note during the quarter ended December 31, 2008 was approximately $1.4 million and the outstanding balance at December 31, 2008 was approximately $2.4 million. The daily average borrowing under the Line of Credit during the

~~quarter~~Credit ~~ended~~Services ~~December 31,~~of ~~2008~~America ~~was~~FLCA ~~approximately $1.8 million and~~ (the ~~outstanding balance at December~~“Credit ~~31, 2008 was $1~~Facility”).~~8 million.~~ ~~The~~While ~~amount~~our ~~available~~loan toagreement usis ~~under~~with ~~the~~Farm ~~Line~~Credit, ofthey ~~Credit~~have ~~was~~participated ~~reduced~~out byportions ~~the~~of ~~amount~~our ofloan ~~three~~to ~~standby~~other ~~letters~~lending ofinstitutions. ~~credit~~The ~~totaling~~Credit ~~approximately~~Facility ~~$1,684,000~~provides ~~as of December 31,~~for: ~~2008.~~

We(i) ~~pay interest on funds borrowed under the Credit Facility at~~ a ~~variable~~term ~~annual rate above the three-month LIBOR rate. In connection with the amendment to the~~ credit facility ~~described below~~of $35,643,750 ~~the~~which ~~interest~~we ~~rate~~are ~~increased~~obligated ~~from 3% above the three month LIBOR,~~ to 4%repay ~~above~~in ~~the three month~~quarterly ~~LIBOR.~~installments ~~The interest rate is reset on a monthly basis and there is no limit on the amount~~ of ~~the change~~$1,188,125 inplus ~~the~~accrued interest ~~rate.~~with ~~The average interest rate on~~ the ~~Credit~~final ~~Facility~~installment ~~during~~due ~~the~~in ~~quarter~~March ~~ended December 31 2008~~2015, ~~was~~subject ~~6.19%. The interest rate that we pay on the Term Note and the Revolving Promissory Note will be reduced~~ to ~~2.85% above the three-month LIBOR rate after~~ a ~~year~~requirement ~~end in which our ratio of net worth~~ to ~~total~~make ~~tangible~~special ~~assets~~principal ~~exceeds~~payments ~~60%~~out ~~and~~of weexcess ~~are~~cash ~~not~~flow in ~~default under~~ ~~the~~certain ~~terms~~cases of (the ~~Credit~~“Term ~~Facility.~~Note”);

~~The~~(ii) ~~Credit~~a ~~Facility~~revolving ~~provides~~credit ~~that~~facility ~~from~~under ~~time~~which ~~to time~~ we may ~~elect~~borrow ~~to convert~~ up to ~~75%~~$11,881,250 ofon ~~the outstanding borrowings under the Term Note from the variable rate interest described above to~~ a ~~fixed~~revolving ~~rate~~basis ofas ~~interest~~required ~~quoted by Farm Credit at the time of any such election. Each such election will be for a specific amount of loan principal for a specified period of time, and subject~~ to ~~other~~ ~~terms~~meet ~~and~~our ~~restrictions.~~working Oncapital ~~April 17,~~needs ~~2008,~~which we ~~elected~~are toobligated ~~convert $3.5 million of borrowings~~to ~~under~~repay ~~the~~in ~~Term~~quarterly ~~Note~~installments ~~to a fixed interest rate~~ of ~~6.12% for a period ending April 17~~$1, ~~2011. On April 18~~188, ~~2008~~125, ~~we elected~~ to ~~convert~~the ~~$4.0 million~~extent of ~~borrowings under~~ the ~~Term~~principal ~~Note to a fixed interest~~balance ~~rate of 5.97% for a period ending April 18~~outstanding, ~~2010.~~beginning ~~On April~~September 212015, ~~2008,~~or wethree ~~elected~~months toafter ~~convert increments~~the ofrepayment ~~$5.5 million and $4.5 million~~ of ~~borrowings under~~ the Term Note ~~to a fixed interest~~ ~~rate~~described ofabove ~~5.65%~~(the ~~for~~“Revolving aPromissory ~~period~~Note”); ~~ending April 21, 2009,~~ and ~~6.69% for a period ending April 21, 2012,~~ ~~respectively.~~

~~The~~(iii) ~~Term~~a ~~Note,~~line ~~Revolving Promissory Note and Line~~ of Credit are subject to protective covenants requiring us to maintain various financial ratios and tangible net worth. They also limit our annual capital expenditures and membership distributions. As of December 31, 2008, the Company was out of compliance with the minimum working capital covenant in the credit ~~agreement.~~for ~~In addition,~~up based on its projections of operating results through September 30, 2009, the Company reasonably anticipated that it would not be in compliance with the debt service coverage ratio as of September 30, 2009. The lending institution waived compliance with the minimum working capital covenant at December 31, 2008 and has modified the terms of the credit agreement to ~~reduce the minimum working capital requirement from~~ $63,~~000~~500,000 towhich ~~$4,000,000 beginning~~we ~~January 31,~~use ~~2009.~~primarily Atfor ~~September 30,~~grain ~~2009 and~~hedging ~~thereafter,~~ (the ~~minimum~~“Line ~~working capital requirement will increase to $5,000,000. For purposes~~ of ~~the~~Credit”) ~~credit~~through agreement, working capital is defined as current assets, plus any unused borrowing capacity under the revolving line of credit, less current liabilities. The lending institution also agreed to eliminate the debt coverage ratio requirement for the fiscal year ending SeptemberJune ~~30,~~ 2009~~. In connection with the waiver and the~~ amendments to the credit agreement, the interest rate on the variable portion of the Company’s borrowings for the remaining term of the credit agreement was increased from 3% over the three-month LIBOR rate to 4% over the three-month LIBOR rate. The Company anticipates that it will be able to comply with all covenants in the credit agreement for the remainder of 2009 based on its current projections of operating results. However, there is no assurance that actual results of operations will not be less favorable than the Company’s forecasted results which include among other things, management estimates, assumptions, and weighted probabilities for anticipated corn, ethanol, natural gas, and distillers grains prices, cash flows, and production rates. If the Company is not in compliance with its credit agreement covenants, the lending institution may enforce its available remedies against the Company. Among other things, borrowings under the term note, revolving promissory note and the line of credit are secured by a first priority security interest on all of the Company’s business assets.

16 As of March 31, 2009, the remaining principal on the Term Note was approximately $26.0 million. No quarterly installment on the Term Note was required during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 because it was prepaid as of September 30, 2008. We did not make an annual “excess cash flow” payment of principal under the Term Note in January 2009 in order to maintain compliance with loan covenants.

We borrowed approximately a net $4.6 million under our Revolving Promissory Note and a net $1.1 million under our Line of Credit during the first six months of fiscal 2009 in order to meet our working capital needs. The daily average borrowing under the Revolving Promissory Note during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was approximately $4.0 million and the outstanding balance at March 31, 2009 was approximately $4.6 million. As a result, we had approximately $7.2 million in available credit under the Revolving Promissory Note at March 31, 2009. However, as discussed below, our ability to obtain additional advances on the Revolving Promissory Note may be limited by the lenders under certain circumstances.

The daily average borrowing under the Line of Credit during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was approximately $1.8 million and the outstanding balance at March 31, 2009 was $1.8 million. The amount available to us under the Line of Credit is reduced by the amount of three standby letters of credit totaling approximately $1.7 million as of March 31, 2009. Accordingly, we had no further available credit under the Line of Credit at March 31, 2009.

Except for amounts on the Term Loan which we have elected to convert to fixed rates of interest, we pay interest on funds borrowed under the Credit Facility at a variable annual rate equal to 4.0% above the three-month LIBOR rate (but in no event less than 5.0% per annum). The interest rate is reset on a monthly basis and there is no limit on the amount of the change in the interest rate. The average variable interest rate on the Credit Facility during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, was 4.89%.

The Credit Facility provides that from time to time we may elect to convert up to 75% of the outstanding borrowings under the Term Note from the variable rate interest described above to a fixed rate of interest quoted by Farm Credit at the time of any such election. Each such election will be for a specific amount of loan principal for a specified period of time, and subject to other terms and restrictions. On April 17, 2008, we elected to convert $3.5 million of borrowings under the Term Note to a fixed interest rate of 6.12% for a period ending April 17, 2011. On April 18, 2008, we elected to convert $4.0 million of borrowings under the Term Note to a fixed interest rate of 5.97% for a period

~~The~~ending ~~Company~~April 18, ~~is facing liquidity issues due to the operating losses that it incurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and the first quarter of fiscal 2009~~2010. ~~Management~~On ~~has taken~~April 21, ~~and continues to take~~2008, ~~steps~~we elected to ~~control~~convert ~~operating~~increments ~~costs~~of $5.5 million and ~~increase revenues~~$4.5 million ~~We expect that our anticipated operating margins generated from the sale~~ of ~~ethanol,~~borrowings ~~DGs and corn oil, and our available borrowing capacity~~ under ~~our~~the ~~Revolving~~Term ~~Promissory~~ Note ~~will be sufficient~~ to ~~meet~~a ~~our~~fixed ~~working~~interest ~~capital~~rate ~~needs and operating expenses through the remainder~~ of ~~2009~~5.65% ~~However,~~for ~~there~~a ~~is no assurance that the funds~~period ~~available~~ending toApril 21, us2009, ~~will be sufficient to cover our anticipated capital needs~~ and ~~operating~~6.69% ~~expenses, particularly if low prices~~ for ~~ethanol~~a ~~and~~period ~~high~~ending ~~operating costs~~April 21, ~~including specifically the cost of corn~~2012, ~~continue to result in negative operating margins at current levels or below for an extended period~~respectively. InOn ~~addition~~April 21, ~~if we are unable to maintain compliance with loan covenants relating to the~~ ~~Term Note~~2009, ~~Revolving~~a ~~Promissory~~total ~~Note and Line~~ of ~~Credit,~~$5.5 million ~~the lender may require immediate payment~~ of ~~the~~our ~~outstanding~~borrowings ~~balances~~converted ofback ~~these loans and exercise other remedies available~~ to ~~it.~~variable Inrate ~~that case, there is no assurance that we would be able to refinance the Company’s~~ debt ~~or otherwise raise the capital necessary to repay these borrowings~~.

The Term Note, Revolving Promissory Note and Line of Credit are subject to protective covenants requiring us to maintain various financial covenants, ratios and tangible net worth. They also limit our annual capital expenditures and membership distributions. The lending institutions modified the terms of the credit agreement to reduce the minimum working capital requirement from $6,000,000 to $4,000,000 beginning January 31, 2009. However, as of March 31, 2009, the Company was out of compliance with the amended minimum working capital covenant and obtained a waiver from the lending institutions of this noncompliance. The lending institutions also agreed to further reduce the minimum working capital requirement from $4,000,000 to $2,750,000 effective April 1, 2009. On December 31, 2009, the minimum working capital requirement will increase to $3,500,000 through December 30, 2010, after which the minimum working capital requirement will increase to $5,000,000. For purposes of the credit agreement, working capital is defined as current assets, plus any unused borrowing capacity under the revolving promissory note, less current liabilities. In addition, based on its projections of operating results through March 31, 2010, the Company reasonably anticipated that it would not be in compliance with the debt service coverage ratio and minimum tangible net worth covenants. The lending institutions agreed to eliminate the debt coverage ratio requirement for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009. The tangible net worth requirement was reduced from $36,800,000 to $35,500,000 effective April 1, 2009. On December 31, 2009, the minimum tangible net worth requirement will increase to $36,250,000 through December 30, 2010, after which it will increase to $37,750,000. Capital expenditures during fiscal years 2008 and 2009 are limited to a total of $2,500,000 for the two year period. Thereafter, capital expenditures are limited to $500,000 per year. The amendment also prohibits distribution of earnings without prior written consent of the lender through September 30, 2010.

With the forgoing modifications, the Company anticipates that it will be able to comply with all the covenants in the Credit Facility through March 31, 2010, based on its current projection of operating results. However, it is at least reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those projections; which include among other things, management estimates, assumptions, and weighted probabilities for anticipated corn, ethanol, natural gas, and distillers grains prices, cash flows, and production rates and efficiencies. If the Company is not in compliance with its credit agreement covenants, the lending institution may enforce its available remedies against the Company under the Credit Facility. Among other things, borrowings under the term note, revolving promissory note and the line of credit are secured by a first priority security interest on all of the Company’s business assets.

In connection with the waivers and the amendments to the credit agreement, the interest rate on the variable portion of the Company’s borrowings for the remaining term of the credit agreement was increased from 3% over the three-month LIBOR to 4% over the three-month LIBOR rate, but shall not, in any event, be less than 5% per annum. The amendments to the credit agreement also eliminated the provision that would have lowered the interest rate on the Term Note and the Revolving Promissory Note to 2.85% above the three-month LIBOR rate after a year end in which the Company’s ratio of net worth to total tangible assets exceeds 60% and the Company is not in default under the terms of the Credit Facility. The amendments to the interest rate provisions will result in the Company paying more interest on its variable rate borrowings under the Credit Facility.

The Company is facing liquidity issues due to the operating losses that we incurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and the first six months of fiscal 2009. Management has taken, and continues to take, steps to control operating costs and increase revenues. We expect that our anticipated operating margins generated from the sale of ethanol, DGs and corn oil, and our available borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and operating

expenses through March 31, 2010. However, there is no assurance that the funds available to us will be sufficient to cover our anticipated capital needs and operating expenses, particularly if low prices for ethanol and high operating costs, including specifically the cost of corn, continue to result in negative operating margins at current levels or below for an extended period. In addition, the lending institution may limit additional advances to us under our Credit Facility in the event it determines there has been an event, occurrence or circumstance that has a material negative effect on our business operations or prospects. In that case, we may not be able to meet our working capital needs even though we remain in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facility unless we were able to raise additional debt or equity capital. Furthermore, if we are unable to maintain compliance with loan covenants under the Credit Facility, the lending institution may require immediate payment of the outstanding balances of these loans and exercise other remedies available to it. There is no assurance that we could raise additional equity or debt financing if needed to meet our working capital needs or to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility in the event of a default. If we did raise additional equity capital or debt financing, it could result in dilution to the existing holders of our membership units.

Application of Critical Accounting Estimates

Management uses various estimates and assumptions in preparing our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Accounting estimates that are the most important to the presentation of our results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgment by management, are designated as our critical accounting estimates. We have described these critical accounting estimates in the Management’s Discussion ~~and~~ and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on ~~Form~~ Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Management periodically re-evaluates and ~~adjusts~~ adjusts its critical accounting policies as circumstances change. However, there were no changes in the Company’s critical accounting estimates during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer), Charles Hofland, along with our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer), Mark Rolfes, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as of ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009. Based upon this review and evaluation, these ~~officers~~ officers believe that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that ~~material~~ material information related to us is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time ~~periods~~ periods required by the forms and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2008~~2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

1723

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

~~None~~The annual meeting of members was held on March 24, 2009. At the annual meeting, members voted to:

	(i)		elect three Group I directors to serve for a three-year term; and

	(ii)		ratify the appointment of Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Co. P.L.L.P. as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.

There were 3,789 membership units entitled to vote at the meeting, of which 1,736 (45.8%) were represented at the meeting. A quorum at a meeting of the Company’s requires that not less than 25% of the units entitled to vote be in attendance, in person or by proxy, at the meeting.

The voting results were as follows:

Election of Group I Directors


Name	For		Authority Withheld
John Kingsbury		1,690		46
Doug Garwood		1,690		46
Mark Condon		1,663		73


Ratification of Auditors	For		Against		Abstained
		1,571		37		128

As a result, each nominee for director was elected to the Board of Directors for a three-year term ending in 2012 and the appointment of Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibell & Co. P.L.L.P. as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009 was duly ratified by the members.

Item 5. Other Information

The following additional information is being reported under this Item 5 of Part II of this Report on Form 10-Q in lieu of under Item 1.01 “Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement” and Item 2.03 “Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation Under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant” of Form 8-K.

On ~~February~~May 1915, 2009, we entered into a ~~Seventh~~Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Credit ~~Agreement~~ Agreement Amendment”) which amends the Credit Agreement we entered into on May 4, 2006 with Farm ~~Credit~~ Credit Services of America, FLCA and Farm Credit Services of America, PCA, as previously amended on October 27, 2006, May 15, 2007, September 25, 2007, April 11, 2008, June 30, 2008, ~~and~~ January 30, 2009, February 13, 2009 and April 13, 2009 (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement Amendment ~~changes~~provides that the variable interest rate we pay on outstanding balances under the Credit Agreement ~~from~~will ~~the~~remain ~~Libor~~at ~~Short~~the ~~Term~~three-month ~~Index~~LIBOR ~~Rate~~rate plus 3 4.00%, tobut ~~the~~now ~~Libor~~provides ~~Short~~that ~~Term~~in ~~Index~~no ~~Rate~~event will ~~plus~~the 4variable rate be less than 5.00%, ~~effective~~per ~~February 19, 2009~~annum. In addition, the Credit Agreement Amendment eliminates ~~changes~~the ~~two~~provision ~~financial~~of ~~covenants contained in~~ the Credit Agreement. ~~The first~~under ~~change~~which to the ~~covenants~~variable israte awould ~~reduction~~be toreduced to the ~~amount~~three-month ofLIBOR ~~working~~rate ~~capital~~plus we2.85% ~~are~~for ~~required~~any ~~to maintain~~year ~~from~~as ~~$6,000,000~~long toas ~~$4,000,000~~the ~~beginning~~ratio ~~January 31, 2009.~~of ~~At September 30, 2009 and thereafter,~~ our ~~minimum~~net ~~working~~worth ~~capital~~to ~~requirement~~total tangible ~~will~~assets ~~increase~~as toof ~~$5,000,000.~~the ~~For purposes~~end of the ~~Credit~~previous ~~Agreement,~~year ~~working~~was ~~capital~~equal isto ~~defined~~at asleast ~~our~~60% ~~current~~and ~~assets,~~we ~~plus~~are ~~any~~not ~~unused~~in ~~borrowing~~default ~~capacity~~ under the ~~revolving~~terms ~~line~~ of ~~credit component of~~ the Credit Agreement~~, less our current liabilities~~. ~~The~~As ~~second~~a ~~change~~result, tofuture ~~the~~interest ~~covenants~~expense iswe ~~the~~incur under ~~elimination of~~ the ~~debt~~Credit ~~coverage ratio~~Agreement ~~requirement~~may ~~for our fiscal year ending September 30, 2009. For fiscal years after that we will continue to~~ be ~~required~~greater tothan ~~maintain~~they ~~a debt coverage ration of 1.5 to 1, which is the ratio we~~ would have been ~~required to maintain at September 30, 2009~~ without ~~the~~these ~~Credit Agreement Amendment~~amendments. Debt service coverage is defined as net income plus depreciation and amortization minus extraordinary gain (loss) minus after tax income (expense) minus gain (loss) on assets sale to current principal of long-term debt.

The ~~remainder~~Credit Agreement Amendment also changes three financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. The first change to the covenants was a reduction to the amount of working capital we are required to maintain from $4,000,000 to $2,750,000 beginning April 30, 2009. The minimum working capital requirement will increase to $3,500,000 on December 31, 2009 and will increase to $5,000,000 on December 31, 2010. For purposes of the ~~material~~Credit ~~terms~~Agreement, working capital is defined as our current assets, plus any unused borrowing capacity under the revolving line of credit component of the Credit Agreement, ~~remain~~less inour ~~effect~~current ~~and~~liabilities. ~~were~~The ~~not~~second change to the ~~affected~~financial bycovenants was the reduction in the tangible net worth requirement beginning April 30, 2009 from $36,800,000 to $35,500,000. The tangible net worth requirement will increase to $36,250,000 on December 31, 2009 and increase to $37,750,000 on December 31, 2010. Prior to the Credit Agreement Amendment, the tangible net worth requirement would have increased to $38,300,000 on September 30, 2009. Tangible net worth is defined as our total assets minus total liabilities. The final change to the financial covenants was to increase the total amount of capital expenditures we can make during the two year period consisting of fiscal 2008 and 2009 from $2,000,000 to $2,500,000.

18 The Credit Agreement Amendment also requires us to provide the lenders with a monthly report of all open commodity positions that we maintain. In addition, the Credit Agreement Amendment prohibits us from making cash distributions of any nature to our members, including redemptions of member interests or cash distribution for the payment of estimated income tax liabilities, until the end of our fiscal 2010 without the consent of the lenders.

The remainder of the material terms of the Credit Agreement remain in effect and were not affected by the Credit Agreement Amendment. We paid a fee of $30,000 to the lenders in connection with the Credit Agreement Amendment.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are included in this report:

Exhibit No.		Exhibit
3.1		Articles of Organization of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File No. 333-123473) and incorporated by reference herein.
3.2		Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File No. 333-123473) and incorporated by reference herein.
4.1		Form of Membership Certificate. Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File No. 333-123473) and incorporated by reference herein.
10.1		~~Seventh~~Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, made and entered into effective ~~February~~January 1930, 2009, by and between ~~Siouxland~~the ~~Ethanol,~~Company ~~LLC~~ and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA and Farm Credit Services of America, PCA. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 2, 2009 (Commission File No. 000-52420) and incorporated by reference herein.
10.2		Seventh Amendment to Credit Agreement, made and entered into effective February 19, 2009, by and between the Company and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA and Farm Credit Services of America, PCA. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed February 23, 2009 (Commission File No. 000-52420) and incorporated by reference herein.
10.3		Ethanol Product Off-Take Agreement, dated May 1, 2009, by and between the Company and Gavilon, LLC*
10.4		Ninth Amendment to Credit Agreement, made and entered into effective May 15, 2009, by and between the Company and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA and Farm Credit Services of America, PCA.
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a).
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a).
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.
32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.

19 * Certain confidential portions of this Exhibit were omitted by means of redacting a portion of the text. This Exhibit has been filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission with the redacted text pursuant to the Company’s Application Requesting Confidential Treatment under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	~~SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC~~	SIOUXLAND ETHANOL, LLC
Date: February 23, 2009	/s/ Charles Hofland
Date: May 20, 2009		/s/ Charles Hofland
	~~Charles Hofland~~	Charles Hofland
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
		President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: February 23, 2009	/s/ Mark Rolfes
Date: May 20, 2009		/s/ Mark Rolfes
	~~Mark Rolfes~~	Mark Rolfes
	Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
		Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

20 27

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · Siouxland Ethanol, LLC