TABLETable OFof CONTENTSContents

TheTable Express stores typically are located in high traffic freestanding, strip centers and mall locations with most stores averaging 3,000 square feet. The Express stores are usually staffed with two managers and a support staff of four to eight associates. Mainline stores have an average size of 1,700 square feet and are also located in freestanding buildings, or in smaller strip or regional centers. Mainline stores are usually staffed with one manager and two to three associates. Most Pearle stores have a doctor of optometry on site with approximately 80% leasing space from Pearle on an independent basis and the remaining being direct employees of Pearle. Contents

MostTable of Things Remembered’s store merchandise is shipped through its centralized warehouse and distribution facility located near Youngstown, Ohio. The warehouse utilizes a computerized carousel system to automate the process of locating merchandise needed to fill store orders. Systems and support are also provided to handle e-commerce, catalog and direct mail fulfillment. Contents

ColeTable Licensed Brands leases six optical laboratories, located in Columbus, Ohio; Knoxville, Tennessee (two labs); Memphis, Tennessee; Salt Lake City, Utah; and Richmond, Virginia, pursuant to leases expiring (including renewal options) in between 2001 and 2017. A three year extension of the lease expiring in 2001 was recently negotiated. Contents

FiscalTable 1999of Compared to Fiscal 1998 Contents

Restructuring,Table Businessof Integration and Other Unusual Charges Contents

ReferTable to Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the restructuring, business integration and other unusual items. Contents

InformationTable required by this Item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K. Contents

INDEXTable TOof CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES Contents

Cleveland,Table Ohio, March 26,of 2001. Contents

F-3 Table of Contents

TheTable accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated statements. Contents

PropertyTable and equipment, at cost, consist of the following at February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000 (000’s omitted):Contents

TheTable Company’s notes receivable are primarily from Pearle’s franchisees throughout the United States. The franchise notes are collateralized by inventory, equipment, and leasehold improvements at each location, generally bear interest at the prime rate plus 3%, and require monthly payments of principal and interest over periods of up to ten years. Contents

TradenamesTable acquired in connection with the Pearle acquisition in 1996 are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years and are presented net of accumulated amortization of $5,231,000 and $3,971,000 at February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000, respectively. Amortization of tradenames in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $1,260,000, $1,236,000 and $1,236,000, respectively. Contents

Long-livedTable assets, such as property and equipment, goodwill and other intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the total of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the asset. Contents

ForTable purposes of reporting cash flows, all temporary cash investments which have original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments. Contents

TheTable income tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the Company“s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000 are as follows (000’s omitted): Contents

ARTHURTable ANDERSENof LLP Contents

(continued) Table of Contents

X-2 Table of Contents

PART I
	Item 1. Business
	Item 2. Properties
	Item 3. Legal Proceedings
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders
PART II
	Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
	Item 6. Selected Financial Data
	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
	Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
	Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
	Item 11. Executive Compensation
	Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
	Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
	Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
	INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Schedule I
COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
	EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 24--POWER OF ATTORNEY

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

~~SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON~~Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

X		Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2001, or
__		Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from _________ to _________.

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

~~Commission~~For ~~file~~the ~~number~~fiscal ~~33-66342~~ year ended January 31, 2004,

~~COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC.~~OR ~~(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)~~

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		34-1744334 (I.R.S. employer identification no.)
5915 Landerbrook Drive, Mayfield Heights, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices)		44124 (Zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:		(440) 449-4100

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

~~Securities~~For ~~registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of~~ the ~~Act:~~transition period ~~None~~from to .

~~Securities~~Commission ~~registered~~file ~~pursuant~~number ~~to Section 12 (g) of the Act: None~~33-66342

~~The~~COLE ~~registrant~~NATIONAL ~~meets~~GROUP, ~~the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form in the reduced disclosure format~~INC.

~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant~~ (~~1) has~~Exact ~~filed~~name ~~all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)~~ of ~~the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the~~ registrant ~~was~~as ~~required~~specified toin ~~file~~its ~~such reports~~charter)~~, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. X YES NO~~

All of the outstanding capital stock of the registrant is held by Cole National Corporation.


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		34-1744334 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1925 Enterprise Parkway, Twinsburg, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices)		44087 (Zip Code)

~~As of March 28, 2001, 1,100 shares of the registrant~~Registrant’s ~~common~~telephone ~~stock~~number, ~~$.01~~including ~~par value,~~area ~~were~~code: ~~outstanding.~~(330) 486-3100

~~Documents~~Securities ~~incorporated~~registered bypursuant ~~reference~~to section 12(b) of the act: None

~~TABLE~~Securities OFregistered ~~CONTENTS~~pursuant to section 12(g) of the act: None

Part I			Page
Item	1.	Business		1
	2.	Properties		3
	3.	Legal Proceedings		4
	4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		4
Part II
Item	5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters		4
	6.	Selected Financial Data		4
	7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		5
	7a.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		10
	8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		10
	9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		10
Part III
Item	10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant		10
	11.	Executive Compensation		10
	12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		10
	13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		10
Part IV
Item	14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K		11

The registrant meets the conditions set forth in general instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form in the reduced disclosure format.

~~PART~~ Indicate Iby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days YES x NO o.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference to in Part III of this Form 10-K OR any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES x NO o.

All of the outstanding capital stock of the registrant is held by Cole National Corporation.

As of March 31, 2004, 1,100 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: NONE

TABLE OF CONTENTS


			Page
Part I

Item	1.	Business		1
	2.	Properties		4
	3.	Legal Proceedings		5
	4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		6

Part II

Item	5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters		6
	6.	Selected Financial Data		6
	7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		7
	7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		24
	8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		25
	9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		25
	9A.	Controls and Procedures		25

Part III

Item	10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant		25
	11.	Executive Compensation		25
	12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		26
	13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		26
	14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services		26

Part IV

Item	15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K		26

		Signatures		27

		Exhibit Index		X-1
AMEND 2 CNG 1999 SERP
POLLOCK INSTR DESIG SERP
POLLOCK SERP PAY ELECTION AGRMT
POWER OF ATTORNEY
CERTIFICATION OF CEO
CERTIFICATION OF CFO
SECTION 1350 CERTS OF CEO & CFO

Forward Looking Statements

Cole National Group Inc.’s (including its direct and indirect subsidiaries and predecessor companies, the “Company”) expectations and beliefs concerning the future contained in this document are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those forecasted due to a variety of factors that can adversely affect the Company’s operating results, liquidity and financial condition such as risks associated with potential adverse consequences of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements, including those resulting from litigation or government investigations, restrictions or curtailment of the Company’s credit facility and other credit situations, costs and other effects associated with the California litigation, risks that the contemplated merger between Cole National Corporation and Luxottica Group S.p.A. will not be completed, uncertainty as to the timing of obtaining regulatory approvals and clearance for the Merger, the timing and achievement of improvements in the operations of the optical business, the results of Things Remembered, which is highly dependent on the fourth quarter holiday season, the nature and extent of disruptions of the economy from terrorist activities or major health concerns and from governmental and consumer responses to such situations, the actual utilization of Cole Managed Vision funded eyewear programs, the success of new store openings and the rate at which new stores achieve profitability, the Company’s ability to select, stock and price merchandise attractive to customers, success of systems development and integration, costs and other effects associated with litigation, competition in the optical industry, integration of acquired businesses, economic and weather factors affecting consumer spending, operating factors affecting customer satisfaction, including manufacturing quality of optical and engraved goods, the Company’s relationships with host stores, franchisees and managed care clients, the mix of goods sold, pricing and other competitive factors, and the seasonality of the Company’s business.

PART I

Item 1. Business

General

On January 26, 2004, Cole National ~~Group,~~Corporation ~~Inc.,~~(the “Parent”) announced that it entered into a ~~wholly~~definitive ~~owned~~merger ~~subsidiary~~agreement ofwith ~~Cole~~the ~~National~~Luxottica Group ~~Corporation,~~S.p.A ~~was~~(the ~~incorporated~~“Merger”). asUnder athe ~~Delaware~~agreement, ~~corporation~~Luxottica inGroup ~~July 1993~~will asacquire aall of ~~successor~~the tooutstanding ~~companies~~shares ~~that~~of ~~began~~the ~~approximately~~Parent ~~60 years~~for ~~ago.~~a ~~Cole~~cash ~~National~~purchase price of $22.50 per ~~Group~~share, istogether awith ~~leading~~the ~~provider~~purchase of ~~vision~~all ~~care~~outstanding ~~products~~options and ~~services,~~similar ~~managed~~equity ~~vision~~rights ~~care~~at ~~programs~~the ~~and~~same ~~personalized~~price ~~gifts~~per ~~with 2~~share,~~813~~ ~~retail~~less ~~locations~~their inrespective ~~50 states~~exercise prices, ~~Canada~~for a ~~and~~total ~~the~~price ~~Caribbean~~of approximately $400 million. ~~References~~The ~~herein~~Merger tois ~~the~~subject ~~“Company”~~to ~~include~~the ~~Cole~~approval ~~National~~of ~~Group,~~the ~~its~~Parent’s ~~direct~~stockholders and ~~indirect~~the ~~subsidiaries,~~satisfaction ~~and~~of ~~its~~other customary ~~predecessor~~conditions, ~~companies.~~including ~~The~~compliance ~~Company’s~~with ~~vision~~applicable ~~care~~antitrust ~~products~~clearance requirements. On February 27, ~~services~~2004 the Parent and Luxottica Group filed ~~programs~~pre-merger ~~are~~notifications ~~offered~~with ~~through~~the ~~retail~~U.S. ~~locations~~antitrust ~~branded~~authorities ~~“Pearle~~pursuant ~~Vision”,~~to ~~“Sears~~the ~~Optical”,~~Hart-Scott-Rodino ~~“Target~~Antitrust ~~Optical”~~Improvements ~~and~~Act of 1976 (“~~BJ’s~~the ~~Optical~~HSR ~~Department~~Act”). ~~and~~On ~~through Cole~~March ~~Managed~~30, ~~Vision~~2004 ,the ~~collectively~~Parent ~~referred~~and toLuxottica ~~herein~~Group asjointly ~~Cole~~announced ~~Vision.~~that ~~Personalized~~they had ~~gifts~~received ~~are~~a ~~offered~~request ~~through~~from ~~retail~~the ~~locations,~~Federal ~~e-commerce~~Trade Commission (FTC) for additional information and ~~catalogs~~documentary bymaterial ~~Things Remembered.~~with ~~The~~respect ~~Company~~to ~~believes~~the ~~that~~Merger. Accordingly, the ~~based~~waiting onperiod ~~industry~~under ~~data,~~the itHSR isAct ~~one~~has ofbeen extended until the 30th day after the ~~largest~~date ~~retail~~of ~~optical~~substantial ~~companies~~compliance inwith the ~~world~~request ~~and~~by ~~operates~~both ~~the~~parties, ~~only~~unless ~~nationwide~~earlier ~~chain~~terminated ofby ~~personalized~~the ~~gift stores~~FTC. ~~The~~A ~~Company~~special ~~differentiates~~meeting of the Parent’s stockholders ~~itself~~to ~~from~~consider ~~other~~and ~~specialty~~vote ~~retailers~~upon bythe ~~providing~~Merger ~~value-added~~is ~~services~~scheduled atfor April 20, 2004. The ~~the~~transaction ~~point~~is ofcurrently ~~sale~~expected atto ~~all~~close ofin ~~its~~the ~~retail~~second ~~locations~~half of 2004.

Cole National Group, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Cole National Corporation, was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1984 as a successor to companies that began operations approximately 60 years ago. Cole National Group, Inc., is a leading provider of vision care products and services, including managed vision care programs, and personalized gifts with 2,925 retail locations in 50 states, Canada and the Caribbean. Unless the context otherwise requires, references herein to the “Company” include Cole National Group, its direct and indirect subsidiaries, and its predecessor companies. The Company’s retail vision locations do business primarily under the names “Pearle Vision”, “Sears Optical”, “Target Optical” and “BJ’s Optical” and its managed vision care programs are offered primarily through Cole Managed Vision. Collectively these businesses are referred to herein as “Cole Vision.” Personalized gifts are offered through retail locations, e-commerce and catalogs by Things Remembered. The Company believes that, based on industry data, it is the third largest retail optical company in the United States and operates the only nationwide chain of personalized gift stores. The Company differentiates itself from other specialty retailers by providing value-added services at the point of sale at all of its retail locations.

~~Cole~~ The ~~Vision~~Company ~~contributed~~electronically ~~74%~~files ofits ~~Cole~~annual ~~National~~reports ~~Group’s~~on ~~net~~Form ~~revenue in~~10-K, ~~fiscal~~quarterly ~~2000~~reports ~~with~~on ~~2,029~~Form ~~company~~10-~~owned~~Q, ~~and~~current ~~franchised~~reports ~~retail~~on ~~locations throughout~~Form ~~the~~8-K ~~United States, Canada~~ and ~~the~~any ~~Caribbean as of February 3,~~amendments ~~2001. The Cole Managed Vision programs provide vision care benefits~~ to ~~participants~~ ~~through~~those ~~access~~reports towith athe ~~network~~Securities ~~of company-owned, franchised~~ and ~~third-party~~ ~~optical~~Exchange ~~locations~~Commission.

Cole Licensed Brands

Cole Licensed Brands operates principally under the “Sears Optical”, “Target Optical” and “BJ’s Optical Department” names. As of February 3, 2001, Cole Licensed Brands operated 1,164 retail locations in 47 states and Canada, including 810 departments on the premises of Sears department stores, 104 departments in BJ’s Wholesale Club stores, 117 departments in Target stores, and 133 freestanding stores operated under the name “Sears Optical”. Retail locations are generally operated under a lease or license arrangement through which the host store collects the sales receipts, retains an agreed upon percentage of sales and remits the remainder on a weekly or monthly basis.

Locations are, in most cases, full-service retail eyecare stores offering brand name and private label prescription eyeglasses, contact lenses and accessories, with an on-premises doctor of optometry who performs complete eye examinations and prescribes eyeglasses and contact lenses. Most optical departments, which are typically 1,000 square feet in size, operate with a doctor of optometry, a department manager, and a support staff of from one to seven depending on store sales volume. The majority of the doctors of optometry are independent, as is often required by state law, with the remainder being employed. The independent doctors sublease space and equipment from Cole Licensed Brands where permitted by law, or from the host, and retain their examination fees.

Each of the United States retail locations is computer linked to six centralized manufacturing laboratories, which grind, cut and fit lenses to order and ship them to the stores. The Canadian retail locations have manufacturing done at a centralized manufacturing laboratory located near Toronto. Next day delivery is provided on most of the eyewear offered when requested by customers. All of the frames and lenses used in its eyeglasses are purchased from outside suppliers, both in the United States and several foreign countries.

A variety of marketing and promotional efforts, primarily host advertising, newspaper, direct mail, magazines and yellow pages are used to build and maintain its customer base. Host advertising includes the placement of promotional material within sales circulars or credit card billings sent out by the host store to its customers.

Pearle

At February 3, 2001, Pearle’s operations consisted of 439 company-owned and 426 franchised stores located in 44 states, Canada, and the Caribbean. Most Pearle stores operate in either an “Express” or “Mainline” store format. Express stores contain a full surfacing lab that can manufacture most glasses in approximately one hour. Mainline stores can manufacture over 50% of prescriptions on-site in approximately one hour. Other prescriptions are sent to the central laboratory in Dallas. At February 3, 2001, 280 of the company-owned stores and 121 of the franchised stores were Express, with the balance being Mainline.

~~Pearle’s~~Cole ~~marketing strategy employs a wide range of media at both the~~Vision ~~national and local levels. The franchised and company-owned stores each~~ ~~contribute a percentage of revenues to Pearle’s marketing budget with a~~ ~~significant amount of Pearle’s marketing expenditures devoted to television.~~ Pearle’s brand positioning of high quality eyecare products and services has been reinforced by an advertising and promotions program, which includes Pearle’s advertising slogans: Nobody Cares More for Eyes More Than Pearle, The Doctor Is In and IndividualEyes.

~~Pearle~~ The ~~operates~~Company’s aCole ~~central~~Vision ~~lab~~segment ~~and~~contributed ~~distribution~~77% ~~center~~of inthe ~~Dallas~~Company’s ~~that~~net ~~inventories~~revenue ~~and~~in ~~distributes~~fiscal a2003 ~~comprehensive~~through ~~product~~the ~~line,~~operations ~~including~~of ~~frames~~2,197 Company-owned and ~~eyeglass~~franchised ~~lenses,~~retail ~~contact~~locations ~~lenses~~throughout the United States, ~~optical~~Canada, ~~supplies~~and the Caribbean as of January 31, 2004 and ~~eyewear~~through ~~accessories~~Cole Managed Vision programs that provide vision care benefits to participants through access to networks of ~~company~~Company-owned, franchised and ~~franchised~~third-party optical locations.

~~Pearle~~Cole ~~has~~Licensed ~~maintained a franchise program since 1980. Most of the~~Brands ~~franchised stores are single franchise operations, with no franchisee~~ ~~operating more than ten stores. Each franchisee is required to enter into a~~ ~~franchise agreement requiring payment of an initial franchise fee. The term~~ of the typical franchise agreement is equal to the earlier of ten years or the expiration or termination of the underlying base lease. Royalty and advertising contributions typically are based on a percentage of the franchisee’s gross revenues from the retail operation, excluding non-surgical professional fees and third party revenues. The total monthly advertising contribution is distributed between Pearle’s system-wide advertising fund and the local co-op market advertising fund. Franchisees are generally eligible to participate in Cole Vision’s managed vision care programs.

Cole ~~Managed~~Licensed ~~Vision~~Brands operates principally under the “Sears Optical”, “Target Optical” and “BJ’s Optical” names. As of January 31, 2004, Cole Licensed Brands operated 1,337 retail locations in 47 states and Canada, including 831 departments on the premises of Sears department stores, 108 freestanding Sears Optical stores, 265 departments in Target stores and 133 departments in BJ’s Wholesale Club stores. Retail locations are generally operated under a lease or license arrangement through which the host store collects the sales receipts, retains an agreed upon percentage of sales and remits the remainder on a weekly or monthly basis.

~~Cole~~ Locations ~~Vision’s~~are, ~~managed~~in ~~vision~~most ~~care~~cases, ~~programs~~retail ~~provide~~eyecare ~~comprehensive~~stores ~~eyecare benefits~~offering ~~primarily~~brand ~~marketed~~name and ~~directly~~private tolabel ~~large~~prescription ~~employers~~eyeglasses, ~~HMO’s~~contact lenses and ~~other~~accessories, ~~organizations.~~which ~~Its~~make ~~Vision~~available ~~One~~services ~~discount~~of ~~program~~a ~~gives~~doctor ~~plan~~of ~~sponsors~~optometry ~~the opportunity~~who toperforms ~~offer~~complete eye ~~their~~examinations ~~members~~and aprescribes ~~group~~eyeglasses ~~discount~~and atcontact ~~locations~~lenses. ~~within~~Most optical ~~Cole’s~~departments, ~~managed~~which ~~vision~~are ~~care~~typically ~~network~~1,000 square feet in size, operate with ~~minimal~~a department ~~direct~~manager ~~cost~~and support staff of one to ~~the~~seven ~~plan~~associates depending on ~~sponsor.~~store Itsales ~~also~~volume. ~~offers~~In ~~enhanced~~a ~~programs~~majority toof ~~plan~~the ~~sponsors~~stores, toeye ~~provide~~examination ~~their~~services are ~~members~~available ~~with~~from ~~prepaid~~independent ~~eye~~doctors ~~examinations~~of optometry, as ~~well~~is asoften ~~pricing~~required ~~discounts~~by ~~or funded~~state ~~materials~~law, ~~benefits~~and from doctors of optometry employed by Cole Licensed Brands.

~~Cole~~ Each ~~Managed~~of ~~Vision’s~~the ~~panel~~United ofStates ~~providers~~and ~~has~~Canadian ~~6,600~~retail ~~practitioners~~locations ~~and~~is ~~includes~~computer-linked ato ~~network~~six ofcentralized ~~company-owned~~laboratory ~~retail locations~~facilities, ~~franchised~~which ~~locations~~grind, ~~chains~~cut and fit lenses to ~~independents~~order and ship them to the stores. ~~Cole~~Next-day ~~Managed~~delivery ~~Vision~~can ~~programs~~be ~~generated~~provided ~~approximately~~on ~~35%~~most eyewear when requested by customers. All of the frames and most lenses used in ~~Cole~~eyeglasses ~~Vision’s~~are ~~revenues~~purchased from outside suppliers, both in ~~fiscal~~the ~~2000~~United States and several foreign countries.

~~Things~~ A ~~Remembered~~variety of marketing and promotional efforts, primarily television, newspaper, host advertising, direct mail, and yellow pages are used to build and maintain the customer base for each of the Cole Licensed Brands stores. Host advertising includes the placement of promotional material within sales circulars or credit card billings sent out by the host store to its customers.

~~Things~~ The ~~Remembered~~Company ~~contributed~~believes ~~26%~~it ofhas ~~the~~developed ~~Company’s~~excellent ~~net~~relationships ~~revenue~~with ~~in fiscal~~the ~~2000.~~host ~~As of February 3, 2001, Things Remembered operated 784~~ stores ~~and kiosks~~in ~~generally~~which ~~located~~Cole inLicensed ~~large,~~Brands ~~enclosed~~operates. ~~shopping~~The ~~malls~~Company ~~located~~has ~~in 46~~maintained ~~states.~~its ~~Each~~relationships ~~location~~in ~~carries~~the aoptical ~~wide~~business ~~assortment~~with ofSears ~~engravable~~for ~~items~~over ~~and~~40 years. ~~provides~~Although ~~“while~~leases ~~you~~and ~~shop”~~licenses ~~personalization~~with ~~services~~Sears ~~for~~are ~~any~~terminable ~~occasion~~upon ~~including~~relatively short ~~holiday~~notice, ~~business~~Cole ~~and~~Licensed ~~special~~Brands ~~occasion~~has ~~gift~~never ~~events.~~had ~~Engraving~~a islease ~~offered~~terminated ~~for items~~other ~~purchased~~than atin connection ~~the~~with a store asclosing, ~~well~~relocation asor ~~for~~major ~~items purchased elsewhere~~remodeling.

~~Merchandise sold at Things Remembered stores consists of a broad~~Pearle ~~selection of moderately priced gift categories and items at prices generally~~ ~~ranging from $15 to $150. The gift offering includes writing instruments,~~ ~~clocks, music boxes, picture frames and albums, executive desk sets and~~ accessories, ID bracelets, glassware, lighters, keys and key rings, door knockers and Christmas ornaments. Things Remembered features brand name merchandise as well as higher margin private label merchandise. At some locations computer-controlled embroidery equipment is utilized for the personalization of merchandise, such as throws, sweaters, bathrobes, jackets, baseball caps, towels and baby blankets. These softgoods are also available in most of Things Remembered’s other locations with personalization services provided from a central fulfillment facility.

At Pearle ~~February 3~~Vision (Pearle) operates 379 Company-owned and 481 franchised stores located in 45 states, ~~2001~~Canada, ~~Things~~and ~~Remembered~~the ~~locations~~Caribbean. ~~consisted~~Most ofPearle ~~445~~ stores ~~and~~operate ~~339~~in ~~kiosks.~~either ~~The~~an ~~typical~~“Express” or “Mainline” store ~~consists~~format. ofExpress ~~about~~stores contain ~~1,300~~a ~~square~~full ~~feet,~~surfacing ~~while~~lab that can produce most glasses in approximately one ~~kiosks,~~hour. ~~which~~Mainline ~~are~~stores ~~units~~can ~~generally~~produce ~~located~~over 40% of prescriptions on-site in approximately ~~the~~one ~~center~~hour. At January 31, 2004, 235 of the ~~common~~Company-owned ~~mall~~stores ~~area,~~and ~~are~~154 ~~typically~~of ~~200~~the ~~square~~franchised ~~feet~~stores inwere ~~size~~Express, with most of the balance being Mainline.

~~Things~~ Although ~~Remembered~~the ~~locations~~Express ~~are~~and ~~usually~~Mainline ~~operated~~stores byare ~~one~~capable orof ~~two~~producing ~~employees~~glasses ~~during~~in ~~non-peak~~approximately ~~periods~~one ~~and~~hour, upthe toCompany 15does ~~employees~~not ~~during~~believe ~~the~~that ~~peak~~this ~~Christmas~~capability is ~~season~~important to most Pearle customers. ~~Locations~~During ~~typically~~2003, ~~employ~~approximately a18% ~~store~~of ~~manager~~the prescription oneyeglasses asold ~~full~~by Company-~~time~~owned ~~basis~~Pearle stores were produced in the stores and available the same day as ordered, anof which less than half were ~~assistant~~available ~~store~~within ~~manager~~one onhour. aThe ~~full~~remaining or82% ~~part-time~~of ~~basis~~prescriptions ~~and~~were not available for the ~~balance~~customer ofthe same day as ordered, and were either produced in ~~employees~~the ~~are~~store, ~~part-time~~or ~~sales~~at ~~associates~~Pearle’s central laboratory in Dallas, Texas.

The Express stores typically are located in high-traffic freestanding strip centers or mall locations with most stores averaging 3,500 square feet. The Express stores are usually staffed with a manager and a support staff of four to eight associates. Mainline stores have an average size of 2,400 square feet and are also located in freestanding buildings, or in smaller strip or regional centers. Mainline stores are usually staffed with a manager and two or three associates. Exams are available in or next to most Pearle stores by on-site doctors of optometry with approximately 70% of doctors in Company-owned stores leasing space from Pearle on an independent

~~Nearly all locations are equipped with computerized engravers and key~~2 ~~duplicating machines. Many stores also have equipment for etching glassware items. All locations are equipped with point-of-sale terminals.~~

~~Host~~basis. ~~Relationships~~Most of the remaining doctors are direct employees of Pearle. In California, eye exams are provided by doctors of optometry employed by Pearle Vision Care, Inc., a licensed health care service plan.

~~The~~ Pearle’s ~~Company~~marketing ~~believes~~strategy itemploys ~~has~~a ~~developed~~wide ~~excellent~~range ~~relationships~~of ~~with~~media at both the ~~host~~national ~~stores~~and inlocal ~~which Cole Licensed Brands operates~~levels. The franchised and Company-owned ~~has~~stores each ~~maintained~~contribute ~~its~~a ~~relationships~~percentage inof ~~the~~revenues ~~optical~~to ~~business~~Pearle’s marketing budget with ~~Sears~~a significant ~~for~~amount ~~over~~of ~~40 years.~~Pearle’s ~~Although~~marketing ~~leases~~expenditures devoted to print, television and ~~licenses~~direct ~~with~~mail. ~~major~~Pearle’s ~~hosts~~brand ~~are~~positioning ~~terminable~~of ~~upon~~high quality eyecare ~~relatively~~products ~~short~~and ~~notice,~~services ~~Cole~~has ~~Licensed~~been ~~Brands~~reinforced ~~has~~by ~~never~~an ~~had~~advertising aand ~~lease~~promotions ~~terminated~~program, ~~other~~which ~~than~~includes inPearle’s ~~connection~~long-standing ~~with~~advertising aslogan: ~~store~~“Nobody Cares ~~closing,~~for ~~relocation~~Eyes orMore ~~major remodeling~~Than Pearle.”

~~Purchasing~~ Pearle operates a central lab and distribution center in Dallas, Texas that inventories and distributes a comprehensive product line, including frames, eyeglass lenses, contact lenses, optical supplies and eyewear accessories, to Company-owned and franchised locations.

~~The~~ Pearle ~~merchandise,~~has ~~supplies~~maintained ~~and~~a ~~component~~franchise ~~parts~~program ~~required~~since ~~for~~1980. Most of the franchised ~~various~~stores are single store franchise operations, with no franchisee ~~products~~operating ~~sold~~more bythan ~~the~~ten ~~Company~~stores. ~~are~~Each ~~purchased~~franchisee ~~from~~must enter into a ~~large~~franchise agreement ~~number~~requiring payment of ~~suppliers~~an initial franchise fee. The term of the ~~and~~typical ~~manufacturers~~franchise ~~and~~agreement ~~are~~is ~~generally~~equal ~~readily~~to ~~available~~the lesser of ten years or the term of the underlying base lease. InRoyalty ~~most~~and ~~cases,~~advertising ~~such~~contributions typically have ~~purchases~~been ~~are~~based ~~not~~on ~~made~~a ~~under~~percentage ~~long-term~~of ~~contracts~~the franchisee’s gross revenues from the retail operation, excluding nonsurgical professional fees. The ~~Company~~total ~~believes~~monthly advertising ~~that~~contribution is distributed to Pearle’s system-wide advertising fund and the ~~loss~~local ofco-op ~~any~~market ~~one~~advertising ~~supplier~~fund. orFranchisees ~~manufacturer~~are ~~should~~generally eligible ~~not~~to ~~have~~participate ain ~~material~~Cole Vision’s managed vision care programs. In ~~adverse~~fiscal ~~effect~~2003, on14 ~~its~~new ~~operations~~franchise locations were opened, 11 Company-operated locations were sold to franchisees, one franchise location was converted to a Company-operated location and seven franchise locations closed.

~~Competition~~Cole Managed Vision

~~The~~ Recognizing ~~Company~~the ~~operates~~role inthat ~~highly~~managed ~~competitive~~health ~~businesses.~~care ~~Cole~~would ~~Vision competes~~play ~~with~~in ~~other~~the ~~optical companies~~coming years, ~~private~~in ~~ophthalmologists,~~1988 ~~optometrists and~~Cole ~~opticians~~Vision ~~and~~Corporation ~~HMOs~~created ~~and~~Cole ~~other~~Managed ~~managed~~Vision ~~vision care companies in a highly~~(CMV) to ~~fragmented~~bring ~~marketplace~~its onown ~~the~~unique ~~basis~~capabilities ofto the ~~patient~~vision ~~service~~benefit ~~it provides~~marketplace, ~~as well as price~~ and ~~product~~to provide ~~quality.~~an Inadditional ~~addition,~~source ~~Pearle~~of ~~competes~~customers onfor the ~~basis of~~Company’s ~~its~~owned ~~highly recognized brand name~~ and franchised ~~one-hour~~retail ~~express service~~locations. ~~The~~Since ~~Company believes that~~then, ~~based~~CMV onhas ~~industry~~been ~~data~~developing, ~~Cole Vision is one of the largest~~marketing, ~~optical~~and ~~retail~~administering ~~companies~~group invision ~~the~~benefit ~~world.~~programs ~~Although~~for ~~Things~~employers, ~~Remembered~~health ~~operates the~~plans ~~only nation-wide chain of gift stores offering “while you shop” gift~~and ~~engraving,~~associations ~~key~~nationwide. ~~duplicating~~Today, ~~glass~~CMV ~~etching~~manages ~~and~~funded ~~monogramming,~~benefits asfor ~~well as~~approximately ~~related~~13 million ~~merchandise~~participants, itand ~~competes~~discount ~~with~~benefits ~~many~~for ~~other~~more ~~retailers~~than ~~that sell gift~~80 million ~~items~~participants. ~~Things~~Managed ~~Remembered~~vision ~~competes~~care ~~with~~participants ~~such~~comprise ~~other~~over ~~retailers~~a ~~primarily~~third ~~on the basis~~ of ~~the value-added point of sale services, as well as price and product~~Cole ~~quality.~~Vision’s ~~Some~~retail ~~competitors have greater financial resources than the Company~~customers.

~~Employees~~Things Remembered

Things Remembered contributed 23% of the Company’s net revenue in fiscal 2003. As of ~~February~~January 331, ~~2001~~2004, ~~the~~Things ~~Company~~Remembered ~~and~~operated ~~its~~728 ~~subsidiaries~~inline ~~had~~stores and ~~approximately~~kiosks 9located in large,~~500~~ ~~full-time~~enclosed ~~and~~shopping ~~4,300~~malls ~~part-time~~located ~~employees.~~in ~~During~~47 ~~October,~~states. Each ~~November~~location ~~and~~carries ~~December,~~a ~~the~~wide ~~Company~~assortment ~~employs~~of ~~additional~~engraveable ~~full-~~items and ~~part-time~~provides “while you ~~employees.~~shop” Inpersonalization ~~fiscal~~services ~~2000,~~for ~~approximately~~any ~~4,000~~occasion ~~additional~~including ~~employees~~holiday, ~~were~~wedding, ~~employed~~business ~~during~~recognition ~~such~~and ~~period,~~other ~~with~~special ~~the~~occasion ~~total~~gift ~~number~~events. ofEngraving ~~employees~~is offered ~~peaking~~for ~~at nearly~~items ~~18,000.~~purchased ~~Approximately~~at ~~140~~the ~~employees~~store atas ~~certain~~well ~~Pearle~~as ~~locations~~for ~~are~~items purchased ~~represented~~elsewhere. byCustomers ~~labor~~can ~~unions.~~also ~~The~~purchase ~~Company~~Things ~~considers~~Remembered’s broad gift assortment through its ~~present~~catalogs ~~labor relations~~(1-800-274-7367) toand beits ~~satisfactory~~e-commerce site, http://www.thingsremembered.com.

Merchandise sold at Things Remembered stores and through the catalog and internet consists of a broad selection of moderately priced gift categories and items at prices generally ranging from $15 to $150. The gift offerings include writing instruments, desk accessories such as desk sets, recognition plaques and awards; women’s gifts which include sterling jewelry, jewelry boxes, and keepsake boxes; men’s gifts which include barware, valet boxes, and leather goods; gifts for newborns and children including baby cups, rattles and jewelry as well as apparel and quilts. Gifts for the home include glassware, clocks, frames, albums and a special assortment of holiday gifts such as ornaments and other collectible items. Gifts for pets include food bowls, treat jars and pet throws. Things Remembered features brand name merchandise as well as higher margin private label merchandise. Engraving for all hardline merchandise is offered at all locations. Personalization of softline merchandise, such as throws, pillows, polo shirts, bathrobes, canvas totes and baby blankets are available from all locations with personalization provided from a central fulfillment facility.

At January 31, 2004, Things Remembered locations consisted of 464 inline stores and 264 kiosks. The typical inline store consists of about 1,300 square feet, while kiosks, which are units generally located in the center of the common mall area, are typically 200 square feet.

Things Remembered locations are usually operated by one or two employees during nonpeak periods and up to 15 employees during the peak fourth quarter holiday season. Locations typically employ a store manager on a full-time basis, an assistant store manager on a full-time or part-time basis, and the balance of employees as part-time sales associates.

All locations are equipped with computerized engravers and some locations have key duplicating machines. Most stores also have equipment for etching glassware items. All locations are equipped with point-of-sale terminals.

Most of the Things Remembered’s store merchandise is shipped through its centralized warehouse and distribution facility located near Youngstown, Ohio. The warehouse utilizes a computerized carousel system to automate the process of locating merchandise needed to fulfill store orders. The warehouse also has systems and support capabilities to fulfill e-commerce and catalog orders within 72 hours.

Purchasing

The merchandise, supplies and component parts required for the various products sold by the Company are purchased from a large number of suppliers and manufacturers and are generally readily available. In most cases, such purchases are not made under long-term contracts. The Company believes that the loss of any one supplier or manufacturer would not have a material adverse effect on its operations.

Competition

The Company operates in highly competitive businesses. Cole Vision competes with other optical companies, private ophthalmologists, optometrists and opticians and health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”) and other managed vision care companies in a highly fragmented marketplace on the basis of the services it provides, as well as price and product quality. In addition, Pearle competes on the basis of its highly recognized brand name, superior customer service and large merchandise assortment. The Company believes that, based on industry data, Cole Vision is the third largest optical retail company in the United States. Although Things Remembered operates the only nationwide chain of gift stores offering “while you shop” gift engraving, key duplicating, glass etching and monogramming, as well as related merchandise, it competes with many other retailers that sell gift items. Things Remembered competes with such other retailers primarily on the basis of the value-added point of sale services, as well as price and product quality. Some competitors have greater financial resources than the Company.

Employees

As of January 31, 2004, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately 9,330 full-time employees. This full-time work force is supplemented by 4,379 part-time and seasonal employees. Approximately 116 Pearle employees are represented by labor unions. The Company considers its present labor relations to be satisfactory.

Segment Information

Information for the Company’s two reportable segments and geographical information are contained in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 2. Properties

~~The~~ All ~~Company~~Cole Licensed Brands retail locations are leased or operated under a license with the host store, and none of the individual retail locations are material to operations. Leases for departments operated in Sears stores are terminable upon relatively short notice. Freestanding stores operated under the name “Sears Optical” are leased for terms which average five years. The leases for ~~its~~departments ~~executive~~operated ~~offices~~in BJ’s Wholesale Club stores expire in ~~Mayfield~~April 2006. The ~~Heights~~licenses for departments operated in Target stores expire in May 2007, ~~Ohio~~and under certain circumstances may be extended at the Company’s option.

On Cole ~~January 19,~~Licensed ~~2001,~~Brands ~~the~~leases ~~Company~~six ~~completed~~optical alaboratory ~~third~~facilities, ~~party~~located ~~sale and leaseback of its office facility~~ in ~~Twinsburg~~ Columbus, Ohio; Knoxville, ~~which~~Tennessee ~~comprises approximately~~(two); ~~175~~Memphis,~~000~~ ~~square~~Tennessee; ~~feet~~Salt ofLake ~~space.~~City, Utah; ~~The lease expires in 2019~~ and ~~includes~~ ~~two~~Richmond, ~~options~~Virginia, pursuant to ~~renew~~leases ~~for~~expiring ~~ten-year~~(including ~~terms. Cole Vision’s home office~~renewal ~~functions~~options) ~~moved~~between to2006 ~~this~~and ~~facility in 1998~~2017.

~~All Cole Licensed Brands retail locations are leased or operated under a~~4 license with the host store, and none of the individual retail locations is material to operations. Leases for departments operated in Sears stores and freestanding stores operated under the name “Sears Optical” are generally for terms of 90 days and five years, respectively.

Pearle leases most of ~~their~~its retail stores under noncancelable operating leases with terms generally ranging from five to ten years and which ~~generally~~ generally contain renewal options for additional periods. Pearle is the principal lessee on a majority of stores operated by franchisees who sublease the facilities from Pearle.

3 In January 2002, Pearle completed a sale and leaseback of its Dallas, Texas Support Center, which comprises approximately 129,000 square feet of laboratory and distribution facilities. The lease expires in 2017 and includes four options to renew for five-year terms. An adjoining office facility, no longer used for operations, was sold in April 2001. Pearle also owns a small headquarters and a laboratory facility in Puerto Rico.

~~Pearle~~ In ~~owns~~the ~~its~~second ~~Dallas~~quarter ~~Support~~of ~~Center,~~fiscal ~~which~~2003 ~~comprises~~the ~~approximately 129,000~~Company ~~square~~closed ~~feet~~its ~~of laboratory~~ manufacturing and distribution ~~facilities~~facility in Toronto, Canada. AnThe ~~adjoining office~~operations ~~facility~~of nothis ~~longer~~facility were ~~used~~absorbed ~~for~~by ~~operations~~the ~~was~~Company’s ~~sold~~facility in ~~April 2001~~Knoxville, TN. ~~Pearle also~~A ~~owns a~~ small headquarters and ~~laboratory~~distribution infacility ~~Puerto~~is ~~Rico~~leased in Canada.

~~Cole~~ Leases ~~Vision~~for ~~also~~Things ~~leases~~Remembered ainline stores and kiosks are generally for terms of ten and five years, respectively. Things Remembered’s home office functions are located in a 50,000 ansquare ~~optical~~foot ~~laboratory~~leased ~~and~~facility ain Highland Heights, Ohio. The lease expires (including renewal options) in 2007. Things Remembered leases its 210,000 square foot warehouse and distribution facility, located near ~~Toronto~~Youngstown, ~~Ontario~~Ohio. ~~for~~The ~~its~~lease ~~Canadian~~expires ~~operations~~in 2013 and includes three ~~pursuant~~options to ~~leases~~renew ~~expiring~~for infive-year ~~2004~~terms.

Leases for Things Remembered stores and kiosks are generally for terms of ten and five years, respectively. In 1999, Things Remembered’s home office functions moved into a leased facility in Highland Heights, Ohio. In December 1998, Things Remembered completed a third party sale and leaseback of its 210,000 square foot warehouse and distribution center located near Youngstown, Ohio. The lease expires in 2013 and includes three options to renew for five-year terms.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time during the ordinary course of business, the Company ismay be threatened with, or may become a party to, a variety of legal actions and other proceedings incidental to its business.

~~Item~~ The 4Company and its optical subsidiaries have been sued by the State of California, which alleges claims for various statutory violations related to the operation of 23 Pearle Vision Centers in California. ~~Submission~~The claims include untrue or misleading advertising, illegal dilation fees, unlawful advertising of ~~Matters~~eye exams, maintaining an optometrist on or near the premises of a registered dispensing optician, unlawful advertising of an optometrist, unlicensed practice of optometry, and illegal relationships between dispensing opticians, optical retailers and optometrists. The action seeks unspecified damages, restitution and injunctive relief. In July 2002, the State of California obtained a preliminary injunction to enjoin certain advertising practices and from charging dilation fees. The trial court’s decision was appealed by both the Company and the State. On November 26, 2003, the appellate court ruled on the appeal in a ~~Vote~~manner adverse to the Company with respect to continued advertising in California by Pearle Vision that expressly or implicitly advertises the furnishing of ~~Security-Holders~~optometric services, disallowing continued advertising of the availability of optometric services with a disclaimer that had been previously approved by the trial court. The appellate court ruled in the Company’s favor with respect to charging dilation fees. On March 3, 2004, the California Supreme Court granted the Company’s petition for review of the Appellate Court’s decision. Although the Company believes that its advertising and operational practices in California complied with California law, the appellate ruling may, if unmodified by the Supreme Court, compel the Company to modify or close its activities in California. Further, the Company might be required to pay damages and or restitution in a currently undeterminable amount, the cost of which might have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and cash flow in one or more periods.

~~Information~~ Things ~~required~~Remembered, byInc. ~~this~~settled ~~item~~a ~~has~~class ~~been~~action ~~omitted~~complaint ~~pursuant~~in California alleging that the putative class (alleged to ~~General~~include 200 members) were ~~Instruction~~improperly Idenied overtime compensation in violation of ~~Form~~California law. The action sought unspecified damages, interest, restitution, as well as declaratory and injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. On February ~~10-K~~3, 2003, Things Remembered and the plaintiffs reached an agreement to resolve the lawsuit for $562,500. Preliminary approval was received from the Court on August 1, 2003. On December 3, 2003, the Court approved final settlement of the lawsuit. A liability of $562,500 was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

~~PART~~ Following IIthe Company’s announcement in November 2002 of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements, the Securities and Exchange Commission began an investigation into the Company’s previous accounting. The course of this investigation or other litigation or investigations arising out of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements cannot be predicted. In addition, under certain circumstances the Company would be obliged to indemnify the individual current and former directors and officers who are named as defendants in litigation or who are or become involved in an investigation. The Company believes it has insurance that should be available with respect to a portion of its indemnification obligations. If the Company is unsuccessful in defending against the current investigation or any litigation, there may be a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.

The Company has been named as a defendant along with numerous other retailers, in patent infringement litigation challenging the defendants’ use of bar code technology in the United States District Court of Arizona, known as Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation, Limited Partnerships v. CompUSA, Inc. et. al., No. Civ. 00-0663. A stay of the proceeding has been sought and was granted, in deference to prior pending declaratory judgment suits brought by the manufacturers and suppliers of the implicated technology seeking to declare the patents in suit not infringed. On January 23, 2004, a court in Nevada entered a memorandum of decision in favor of a manufacturer declaring the Lemelson patents not infringed. This judgment is expected to be appealed by the Lemelson Partnership, and the Arizona infringement litigation against the Company will remain stayed pending the final resolution any such appeal; however, this trial court decision favors the Company and its defenses. The Company believes it has available defenses and does not expect any liability. However, if the Company were to be found liable for an infringement, it might have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and cash flow in the period incurred.

See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these legal proceedings.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

PART II

The Registrant is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cole National Corporation and has no equity securities that ~~trade~~are traded in an established public trading market or otherwise.

The ~~covenants~~indentures inpursuant ~~certain debt instruments~~ to which the ~~Company~~8-5/8% ~~and certain~~Senior ofSubordinated ~~its~~Notes ~~subsidiaries~~due 2007 ~~are~~and ~~parties restrict~~ the ~~ability~~8-7/8% ofSenior ~~the~~Subordinated ~~Company and~~Notes ~~such~~due ~~subsidiaries~~2012 towere ~~make~~issued ~~distributions to Cole National Corporation~~contain ~~orthe~~certain ~~Company,~~optional ~~respectively.~~and Amandatory ~~credit~~redemption ~~facility~~features ~~to which the Company~~ and ~~its subsidiaries~~other ~~are parties permits payment of dividends by the Company’s~~financial ~~subsidiaries~~covenants, toincluding ~~the~~restrictions ~~Company~~on ~~annually of up to $8.0 million plus 0.25% of~~ the ~~net~~ ~~annual~~ability ~~sales~~ of the Company’s ~~subsidiaries~~ to ~~meet expenses of the~~incur ~~Company~~additional ~~or Cole National Corporation~~indebtedness, ~~together with amounts necessary to~~ pay ~~principal~~ ~~and~~dividends ~~interest~~or onmake ~~the~~other ~~Company’s~~restricted ~~8-5/8%~~payments ~~Senior Subordinated Notes due~~to ~~2007~~Cole ~~and~~National ~~9-7/8%~~Corporation. ~~Senior~~The ~~Subordinated~~indentures ~~Notes~~also ~~due~~permit ~~2006~~payments ~~and~~ to ~~meet~~Cole ~~tax~~National ~~obligations.~~Corporation Infor ~~addition,~~certain ~~dividends~~tax ofobligations upand tofor ~~$20.0 million~~administrative ~~are~~expenses ~~permitted~~not to ~~repurchase~~exceed ~~the 8-5/8~~0.25% ~~Notes~~of ~~and/or~~the ~~9-7/8%~~Company’s ~~Notes~~net sales.

So The ~~long as no default or event of default has occurred under the indentures relating to the 8-5/8% Notes and/or the 9-7/8% Notes and the~~ Company has ~~met~~no ~~a specified fixed charge coverage ratio test, payments of dividends to Cole National Corporation of amounts contributed by Cole National Corporation to the~~ equity ofcompensation ~~the~~plans ~~Company~~under ~~subsequent~~which tosecurities ~~September 30, 1993, plus up to one-half~~ of the ~~consolidated net income of the~~ Company ~~since October 31, 1993~~ are ~~permitted.~~authorized Nofor ~~dividends were paid during 2000, 1999 or 1998~~issuance.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

~~Certain~~ On January 26, 2004, Cole National Corporation announced that it entered into a definitive merger agreement with the Luxottica Group S.p.A. Under the agreement, Luxottica Group will acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Parent for a cash purchase price of $22.50 per share, together with the purchase of all outstanding options and similar equity rights at the same price per share, less their respective exercise prices, for a total price of approximately $400 million. The merger is subject to the approval of the Parent’s stockholders and the satisfaction of other customary conditions, including compliance with applicable antitrust clearance requirements. On February 27, 2004 the Parent and Luxottica Group filed pre-merger notifications with the U.S. antitrust authorities pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“the HSR Act”). On March 30, 2004 the Parent and Luxottica Group jointly announced that they had received a request from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for additional information ~~required~~and bydocumentary material ~~this~~with ~~item~~respect to the Merger. Accordingly, the waiting period under the HSR Act has been ~~omitted~~extended ~~pursuant~~until tothe 30th day after the date of substantial ~~General~~compliance ~~Instruction~~with Ithe request by both parties, unless earlier terminated by the FTC. A special meeting of ~~Form~~Parent’s stockholders to consider and vote upon the merger is scheduled for April ~~10-K~~20, 2004. The transaction is currently expected to close in the second half of 2004.

~~Fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to January 31 and are~~Overview ~~identified according to the calendar year in which they begin. For example,~~ ~~the fiscal year ended February 3, 2001 is referred to as “fiscal 2000.”~~ ~~Fiscal 2000 consisted of a 53-week period, fiscal 1999 and fiscal 1998 each~~ ~~consisted of 52-week periods.~~

~~The Company has two reportable segments:~~ Cole ~~Vision,~~National ~~which accounted for 74% of total revenue in fiscal 2000~~Group, ~~and Things Remembered~~Inc., ~~which accounted~~a ~~for~~wholly ~~26%~~owned ofsubsidiary ~~total revenue in fiscal 2000. Most~~ of Cole ~~Vision’s~~National ~~revenue~~Corporation, ~~represents~~is ~~sales~~a ofleading ~~prescription~~provider ~~eyewear,~~of ~~accessories~~optical products and services ~~through~~ ~~its Cole Licensed Brands~~ and personalized ~~Pearle retail locations~~gifts. ~~Cole~~The ~~Vision’s revenue~~Company ~~also~~sells ~~includes~~its ~~sales~~products ofand ~~merchandise~~services tothrough ~~franchisees~~2, ~~royalties based on~~444 ~~sales,~~Company-owned ~~interest~~retail ~~income~~locations ~~on notes receivable~~ and ~~initial~~481 ~~franchise~~franchised ~~fees~~locations ~~from franchisees~~in ~~and~~50 ~~fees from managed vision care programs. Things Remembered’s~~states, ~~revenue~~Canada ~~represents sales of engravable gift merchandise~~ and ~~personalization and other services primarily through retail stores and kiosks. See Note 9 of~~ the ~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of reportable segments~~Caribbean.

5 Fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to January 31 and are identified according to the calendar year in which they begin. For example, the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 is referred to as “fiscal 2003”. Fiscal 2003, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001 each consisted of a 52-week period.

~~Results~~ The Company has two reportable segments, Cole Vision and Things Remembered. Most of ~~Operations~~Cole Vision’s revenue represents sales of prescription eyewear, accessories and services through its Cole Licensed Brands and Pearle Vision retail locations. Cole Vision revenue also includes sales of merchandise to franchisees, royalties based on franchise sales and initial franchise fees for Pearle Vision and capitation revenue, administrative service fee revenue and discount program service fees from its Cole Managed Vision business.

~~The~~ Things ~~following~~Remembered’s isrevenue arepresents ~~discussion~~sales of ~~the~~engraveable ~~results of continuing operations~~gift ~~for~~merchandise, ~~the~~personalization ~~three~~and ~~fiscal~~other ~~years~~services ~~ended~~primarily ~~February 3,~~through ~~2001. This discussion should be~~retail ~~read~~ in-line ~~conjunction~~stores ~~with~~and ~~the~~kiosks. ~~consolidated~~Things ~~financial~~Remembered ~~statements~~revenue ~~and~~also ~~notes thereto~~includes ~~included~~direct insales through ~~Item 8~~its ofe-commerce ~~this~~site, ~~Form 10-K~~http://www.ThingsRemembered.com, ~~The~~sales ~~following table sets for~~through ~~the~~Things ~~certain~~Remembered ~~operating~~catalogs ~~information~~and ~~for~~through ~~each~~third ~~period~~party ~~(dollars~~partner ~~in millions):~~programs.

			Fiscal Year									Change
												2000 vs.			1999 vs.
			2000			1999			1998			1999			1998
Net revenue:
	Cole Vision		$	800.5		$	779.0		$	803.6			2.8	%		(3.1	)%
	Things Remembered			275.9			258.6			241.9			6.7			6.9
		Total net revenue	$	1,076.4		$	1,037.6		$	1,045.5			3.7	%		(0.8	)%
Gross margin			$	720.8		$	674.9		$	678.0			6.8	%		(0.5	)%
Operating expenses				649.3			601.8			584.9			7.9			2.9
Depreciation and amortization				37.4			38.5			32.8			(2.9	)		17.3
Restructuring and other unusual charges				—			—			7.9			—			(100.0	)
		Operating income	$	34.1		$	34.6		$	52.4			(1.3	)%		(34.0	)%
Percentage of net revenue:
	Gross margin			67.0	%		65.0	%		64.8	%		2.0			0.2
	Operating expenses			60.3			58.0			55.9			2.3			2.1
	Depreciation & amortization			3.5			3.7			3.1			(0.2	)		0.6
	Restructuring and unusual charges			—			—			0.8			—			(0.8	)
		Operating income		3.2	%		3.3	%		5.0	%		(0.1	)		(1.7	)
Number of retail locations at the end of the period:
	Cole Licensed Brands			1,164			1,056			1,186
	Pearle company-owned			439			454			471
	Pearle franchised			426			416			409
		Total Cole Vision		2,029			1,926			2,066
	Things Remembered			784			796			818
		Total Cole National		2,813			2,722			2,884
Comparable store sales growth:
	Cole Licensed Brands (U.S.)			3.7	%		(2.7	)%		2.9	%
	Pearle company-owned (U.S.)			2.0			(5.5	)		(1.5	)
		Total Cole Vision		3.1			(3.5	)		1.6
	Things Remembered			5.4			7.2			7.4
		Total Cole National		3.7	%		(0.8	)%		3.1	%
Pearle U. S. Franchise stores				3.3	%		0.4	%		3.0	%
Pearle U. S. chain-wide				2.7	%		(2.4	)%		0.9	%

Beginning in early 2000, management of the Company initiated a comprehensive effort to improve financial performance by rethinking all aspects of how the Company conducts its business. The strategies implemented by management since that time are based upon the following fundamental building blocks:

6 • Developing business units that give clear focus to its different businesses;

~~Fiscal~~• ~~2000~~Getting ~~Compared~~the toright ~~Fiscal~~people ~~1999~~ in the right positions so that they can do the best job possible;

~~The~~• ~~increase~~Developing in net revenue for fiscal 2000 was primarily attributable to increases in consolidated comparable store sales, the 53rd week (approximately $18.5 million), revenue associated with the MetLife vision care business acquired in October 1999 and ~~Target~~executing ~~Optical~~plans ~~expansion.~~that ~~These increases~~are ~~were~~both ~~partially~~strategic ~~offset by the closing of poor performing stores at Pearle~~ and Things Remembered and the closing of 150 optical departments at Montgomery Ward in December 1999. See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the closing of the Montgomery Ward departments. tactical;

At• ~~Cole~~Staying ~~Licensed~~focused ~~Brands~~on ~~and Pearle company-owned stores,~~ the ~~comparable store~~customer ~~sales~~– ~~increases~~who ~~primarily~~they ~~reflected~~are ~~increases~~and inwhy, ~~the average selling price. The number of transactions at Cole Licensed Brands was even with last year~~when, ~~notwithstanding the closing of the Montgomery Ward departments. At Pearle company-owned stores~~where, ~~the~~and ~~average~~how ~~transaction~~they ~~increase was partially offset by a decrease in the number of transactions during the first half of the year. At Things Remembered~~buy, ~~the comparable store sales increase reflected an increase in sales of new merchandise at higher average unit retails.~~ and;

~~The~~• ~~gross~~Changing ~~margin dollar increase was attributable to~~ the ~~revenue increase~~corporate atculture Pearle and Things Remembered, the additional revenue associated with the MetLife vision care business and an improvement in gross margin as a percentage of net revenue. The improvement in the gross margin rate was primarily the result of higher average selling prices in the optical businesses. Other factors in the improvement were additional MetLife vision care revenues, the resolution of problems experienced during 1999’s integration of new manufacturing and merchandise/inventory management systems at Pearle and 1999’s inventory write-off due to ~~the~~one ~~closing~~ of ~~the~~greater Ward Optical departments. At Cole Vision, the gross margin rate improved 2.5 percentage points in fiscal 2000 compared to fiscal 1999. The gross margin rate at Things Remembered decreased 0.3 percentage points to last year reflecting the impact of an aggressive merchandise clearance promotion in the first quarter of fiscal 2000. accountability

~~The~~ Since ~~operating~~adopting ~~expense~~this ~~increase~~approach, ~~for~~the ~~fiscal~~Company ~~2000~~has ~~was~~fine-tuned ~~due~~its ~~primarily~~plans toon many ~~increases~~occasions, inmaking ~~staffing~~adjustments ~~for~~in ~~improved~~response ~~service~~to ~~levels~~market inconditions and the ~~optical~~external environment. ~~businesses~~However, ~~increases~~ ~~in expenses associated with~~ the ~~53rd~~overall ~~week~~direction ~~(which~~has ~~will~~remained ~~not~~constant, ~~recur~~and inthe ~~fiscal~~Company ~~2001)~~believes ~~and~~that ~~the~~its ~~Target~~strategies ~~Optical~~have ~~expansion~~generally ~~(which~~been ~~will~~successful. ~~continue~~One ~~in fiscal~~way ~~2001),~~that ~~increases~~the inCompany ~~managed~~measures ~~vision~~its ~~care~~progress ~~costs~~in ~~(primarily associated with~~ the ~~MetLife~~ vision ~~care~~segment ~~business)~~is ~~and~~by ~~increases~~comparing its insame ~~incentive~~store ~~bonus~~sales ~~expense~~growth ~~due~~with ~~to improved~~the ~~performance~~sales atgrowth ~~Cole~~in ~~Vision.~~the Asoverall aoptical ~~percentage of net revenue,~~retail ~~operating~~industry ~~expenses~~as ~~lost~~reported ~~leverage~~by ~~this~~Jobson ~~year~~Optical ~~because~~Research ~~payroll costs increased 2~~Group.~~0 percentage~~ ~~points~~As ~~compared~~indicated toby athe table ~~year~~below, ~~ago for~~ the ~~reasons~~Company’s ~~discussed~~vision ~~above. A~~segment ~~decline~~same ~~in comparable~~ store sales atgrew ~~Pearle~~faster ~~company-owned~~than ~~stores during~~ the ~~first~~industry ~~six~~in ~~months of~~ fiscal ~~2000~~2003, 2002 and ~~a $1~~2001.~~8 million first quarter 2000 charge~~ ~~for severance costs recorded in connection with a personnel reduction at Cole~~ ~~Vision also impacted the comparison~~

~~The~~Percentage ~~decrease~~Growth in ~~depreciation and amortization for fiscal 2000 compared~~Sales ~~to fiscal 1999 was primarily attributable to the severance charge in 1999 and~~ ~~lower charges in 2000 than a year ago to recognize asset impairments in~~ accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121. These reductions were partially offset by additional amortization of systems development costs this year related to the Pearle manufacturing and merchandise/inventory management system implemented in the third quarter of fiscal 1999 and by additional compensation amortization for restricted stock awarded in January 2000.

Operating income in fiscal 2000 was slightly below fiscal 1999 reflecting improved operating results at both Cole Vision and Things Remembered offset by increased Corporate expenses and the first quarter severance costs. The operating income at Cole Vision improved despite absorbing increased losses associated with the Target Optical start up and store opening program.


	Cole Vision Segment			Optical Retail Industry⁽¹⁾			Difference
2001		2.6	%		(3.7	)%	6.3 pts
2002		3.3	%		1.5	%	1.8 pts
2003		3.8	%		0.6	%	3.2 pts

Interest and other (income) expense increased compared to fiscal 1999 because of increased interest expense from seasonal borrowing and less income from temporary cash investments.

The effective income tax rate was 69.8% in fiscal 2000 compared to 47.4% in fiscal 1999. The rates reflect the significant impact of non-deductible amortization of goodwill and unearned compensation in both years. A more complete discussion of income taxes is included in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The softness in consolidated net revenue for fiscal 1999 was primarily attributable to the decrease in consolidated comparable store sales at Cole Vision. Sales at Cole Licensed Brands have been negatively impacted by a competitive promotional environment. Licensed Brands’ response, which began at the end of the second quarter, produced an improvement in the second half sales trend as comparable store sales were nearly flat to last year. Sales this year at Pearle have also been impacted by the competitive promotional environment and Pearle’s focus, earlier in the year, on long-term, brand-building in its advertising campaign, as well as operating and systems integration issues that the Company is addressing. Pearle refocused its marketing efforts to become more promotional beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 1999. Pearle achieved some improvement in comparable store sales trends during the fourth quarter. Pearle’s comparable store sales for the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999 were a negative 3.0%, as compared to a negative 5.5% full-year comparable store sales. The sales decrease at Cole Vision reflected a lower average selling price for spectacles and contact lenses due primarily to more promotional pricing. At Things Remembered, the comparable store sales increase reflected increased sales of additional personalization and new merchandise at higher average unit retails, along with the benefits from marketing directly to its existing customer base. The total number of transactions at Things Remembered was slightly behind a year ago. During the fiscal year, the Company (~~including franchised locations~~1) ~~opened~~As areported ~~total~~by ~~of 115~~Jobson ~~new~~Optical ~~locations~~Research ~~and closed 277 locations, including 150 optical departments~~Group ~~located in Montgomery Ward stores.~~

~~The~~ Things ~~gross~~Remembered ~~margin~~also ~~dollar~~grew ~~improvement~~same instore ~~fiscal~~sales ~~1999~~in ~~compared to~~ fiscal ~~1998~~ ~~was~~2003, ~~primarily~~despite ~~attributable to increased revenue at Things Remembered and~~a ~~inventory~~difficult ~~markdowns~~retail atenvironment ~~Pearle in 1998, partially offset~~ by ~~lower~~developing ~~revenue~~new ~~at Cole~~product ~~Vision. Excluding the 1998 inventory markdowns at Pearle~~lines, ~~gross margin~~including atchildren’s, ~~Cole~~pet ~~Vision~~accessories, ~~declined~~sterling ~~0.8 percentage~~silver ~~points~~jewelry, togift ~~62.9%~~bags ~~in fiscal 1999~~ and ~~consolidated~~ ~~gross margins were 65~~spa/resort.~~0% and 65.4% in fiscal 1999 and fiscal~~ ~~1998,~~Their ~~respectively.~~direct ~~The~~channel ~~lower~~business ~~gross~~grew ~~margin~~ at ~~Cole~~44% ~~Vision was primarily due to the impact of more promotional pricing~~ and ~~lower margins on contact lenses. In addition~~36%, ~~the integration of new manufacturing and merchandise/inventory management systems with Pearle’s existing warehouse management system resulted~~ in ~~manufacturing~~fiscal ~~and~~2003 ~~distribution inefficiencies that led to increased costs~~ and ~~lost sales in the third and fourth quarters~~2002, ofrespectively ~~fiscal~~as ~~1999. Gross margin at~~ Things Remembered ~~improved~~continues ~~0.4 percentage points~~ to ~~71.4%~~tap ininto ~~fiscal~~new ~~1999,~~avenues ~~benefiting from increased sales~~ of ~~additional~~selling ~~personalization~~to ~~and~~its ~~higher margins from new products~~customers.

The ~~unfavorable~~Company ~~leverage~~has infaced ~~operating~~many ~~expenses~~challenges ~~for~~over the ~~fiscal~~past ~~year~~two ~~was~~years. On October ~~primarily~~8, ~~attributable~~2003 Cole National Corporation announced that it had received an unsolicited offer to acquire the Parent, and that its Board of Directors had formed a Special ~~1.0 percentage~~Committee ~~point~~of ~~increase~~independent indirectors ~~payroll~~on ~~costs~~July 28, a2003 to evaluate the 0Company’s strategic alternatives.~~9 percentage~~ ~~point~~The ~~increase~~work of this committee resulted in ~~managed~~the definitive ~~vision~~merger ~~care~~agreement ~~costs~~between the Parent and aLuxottica 0Group S.2p.A. ~~percentage~~Further ~~point~~information ~~increase~~regarding inthis ~~net~~agreement ~~advertising~~can ~~expenditures.~~be ~~The~~found ~~unfavorable payroll~~in ~~leverage~~Note ~~was~~10 ~~primarily~~of ~~due~~the Notes to ~~the~~Consolidated ~~comparable~~Financial ~~store~~Statements ~~sales~~included ~~decrease~~in ~~at Cole~~this ~~Vision~~Form 10-K and ~~staffing~~in the ~~increases~~definitive inproxy ~~managed~~statement ~~vision~~filed ~~care~~by the Parent on March 15, ~~partly~~2004. ~~offset~~The Company’s byformer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer retired at the annual ~~payroll~~meeting ~~leverage~~of ~~gains~~shareholders on June 25, 2003. With the ~~sales~~filing ~~increase~~of atits ~~Things~~Form ~~Remembered.~~10-K ~~The~~for ~~increase~~the in2002 ~~managed~~fiscal ~~vision~~year ~~care~~on ~~expenses~~May 16, ~~was~~2003, ~~primarily~~the ~~attributable~~Company tocompleted ~~growth~~a restatement of inits ~~call~~financial ~~and~~results ~~claims~~beginning ~~volumes~~in ~~associated~~1998, ~~with~~which ~~increases~~also inrequired ~~sponsor~~re-~~funded~~audits of ~~programs~~fiscal years 2000 and 2001. ~~The~~As ~~unfavorable~~a ~~advertising~~result ~~leverage~~of ~~was~~the ~~due~~restatement, tothe ~~increased~~Parent was ~~advertising~~named atas ~~Cole~~a ~~Licensed~~defendant ~~Brands~~ in ~~response~~a toclass action lawsuit, and the ~~competitive~~Company ~~pricing~~is the subject ~~environment,~~of ~~partly~~an ~~offset~~SEC byinvestigation. ~~reduced~~The ~~spending~~class ataction ~~Pearle.~~lawsuit ~~Depreciation~~was resolved and the Court ~~amortization~~approved ~~expense~~final ~~increases~~settlement ~~were~~on ~~attributable~~September 29, to2003. ~~increases~~The inSEC ~~amortization~~investigation is ofongoing. ~~systems~~Despite ~~development~~these challenges and ~~software~~potential ~~costs~~distractions, ~~plus~~the ~~certain~~Company ~~charges~~has continued to ~~recognize~~grow the business by focusing on the fundamental building blocks ~~asset~~discussed ~~impairments~~above. Further information about these matters and the Company’s performance is included below.

~~The~~Results ~~decrease in income from operations was primarily the result~~ of ~~the~~Operations ~~decrease in net revenue and the increases in operating expenses and~~ ~~depreciation and amortization. Interest and other income includes the~~ ~~recognition of $6.0 million of income in fiscal 1998 from a nontaxable cash~~ ~~settlement with the former owner of Pearle. Excluding the Pearle settlement, net interest and other expense in fiscal 1999 decreased slightly from fiscal 1998.~~

~~Net~~ The ~~interest~~following ~~expense~~schedule ~~and~~sets ~~other~~forth ~~income~~the ~~for~~results ~~fiscal~~from ~~1999~~continuing ~~of $26.7 million~~operations ~~increased~~for ~~$5.6 million~~the ~~compared to~~ fiscal ~~1998.~~years ~~The~~ended ~~increase~~January 31, ~~was~~2004, ~~primarily attributable~~February 1, to2003, ~~the~~and ~~recognition of $6.0~~February ~~million~~2, 2002. ofThis ~~other~~schedule ~~income~~and insubsequent ~~the~~discussions ~~third quarter~~should ofbe ~~fiscal~~read ~~1998 from cash received~~ in ~~the non-taxable settlement of~~conjunction ~~certain~~with ~~contingencies~~the ~~related~~consolidated tofinancial ~~several~~statements ~~claims against~~ and ~~indemnifications from~~notes ~~the~~thereto ~~former~~included ~~owner~~in Item 8 of ~~Pearle. Excluding~~ this ~~settlement,~~Form ~~net interest expense decreased by $0~~10-K.~~4 million, primarily due to increased interest~~ ~~income.~~

The effective income tax rate was 47.4% in fiscal 1999 and 38.2% in fiscal 1998. The income tax provision for fiscal 1998 includes $7.4 million of income tax benefits related to the charges for restructuring and other unusual items. The effective rate on income excluding these charges and the $6.0 million settlement included in other income was 41.0% in fiscal 1998. The effective income tax rates reflect the significant impact of non-deductible amortization of goodwill in both years.


	Fiscal Year									% Change Fav/(Unfav)
										2003 vs.			2002 vs.
(Dollars in millions)	2003			2002			2001			2002			2001
Net revenue:
Cole Vision	$	919.5		$	877.5		$	836.8			4.8	%		4.9	%
Things Remembered		282.3			270.6			272.3			4.3			(0.6	)

Total net revenue	$	1,201.8		$	1,148.1		$	1,109.1			4.7	%		3.5	%

Gross margin:
Cole Vision	$	553.3		$	543.8		$	519.9			1.7	%		4.6	%
Things Remembered		199.7			192.1			193.8			4.0			(0.9	)

Total gross margin	$	753.0		$	735.9		$	713.7			2.3	%		3.1	%

Operating expenses:
Cole Vision	$	528.4		$	513.2		$	500.7			(3.0	)%		(2.5	)%
Things Remembered		178.3			177.0			168.8			(0.7	)		(4.9	)
Unallocated corporate expense		34.3			17.4			9.5			(97.4	)		(81.0	)

Total operating expenses	$	741.0		$	707.6		$	679.0			(4.7	)%		(4.2	)%

Goodwill and tradename amortization:
Cole Vision	$	—		$	—		$	4.1			—	%		(100.0	)%
Things Remembered		—			—			0.9			—			(100.0	)

Total goodwill and tradename amortization	$	—		$	—		$	5.0			—	%		(100.0	)%

Operating income:
Cole Vision	$	24.9		$	30.6		$	15.1			(18.7	)%		102.4	%
Things Remembered		21.4			15.1			24.1			42.3			(37.6	)
Unallocated corporate expense		(34.3	)		(17.4	)		(9.5	)		(97.4	)		(81.0	)

Total operating income	$	12.0		$	28.3		$	29.7			(57.5	)%		(4.7	)%

In Information ~~1998,~~on the ~~Company~~number ~~began implementation~~ of athe ~~restructuring~~Company’s ~~plan~~retail ~~and recorded~~locations aby ~~net pretax charge of $13.1 million related to restructuring of its Pearle~~ business ~~along with other unusual charges. The net pretax charge~~ ~~consisted~~open ofat ~~charges~~January 31, ~~associated~~2004, ~~with the restructuring of $13.9~~February ~~million~~1, ~~a reversal~~2003 ofand ~~previously established restructuring accruals of $12.3~~February ~~million and~~2, ~~other~~2002 ~~unusual~~is ~~charges totaling $11.5 million.~~presented below:

The restructuring charge of $13.9 million relates to changes made to the Pearle operating model and structure of the home office organization. Consultants conducted market research and helped develop and implement changes to Pearle’s marketing message, merchandise offerings and presentation, store locations, organizational structure and other operational opportunities. In addition, home office facilities and personnel, including Cole Managed Vision Care administration and systems were relocated and consolidated into one central facility. The results of these efforts resulted in charges for inventory writedowns related to products that will no longer be carried, severance and hiring costs primarily related to home office organizational changes, consolidation of the home office facilities, including the write-off of fixed assets at the old facilities, consultant fees and changing the Pearle brand message through signing, production and other costs. The charge related to the inventory writedown of $5.2 million was reflected in cost of sales in accordance with EITF No. 96-9.


	Fiscal Year
	2003		2002		2001
Number of retail locations at the end of the period
Sears Optical		939		943		942
Target Optical		265		241		224
BJ’s Optical		133		126		116

Total Cole Licensed Brands		1,337		1,310		1,282
Pearle Company-owned		379		400		423
Pearle franchised		481		464		440

Total Cole Vision		2,197		2,174		2,145
Things Remembered		728		770		774

Total Cole National		2,925		2,944		2,919

As Results ~~part~~ of aoperations ~~revised~~below ~~plan,~~are ~~which~~reflected ~~was~~as ~~approved by the Board of Directors in March 1999, it was determined that certain stores originally identified for closure would either remain open or be closed at~~ a ~~lower~~percentage ~~cost than originally estimated. The revised plan was to close 26 stores,~~ of ~~which~~net ~~nine~~revenues. ~~were~~Data ~~identified~~for in the ~~original~~Cole ~~store~~Vision ~~closing plan, over the next 12 months~~ and ~~remove~~Things ~~surfacing~~Remembered ~~equipment~~segments ~~from~~are ~~full~~shown ~~service~~as ~~labs of 226 stores over the next six to eighteen months. As~~ a ~~result of the revised plan, the expected~~ ~~cost~~percentage of ~~closure~~their ~~was~~respective ~~$1.0 million,~~net ~~requiring a reversal of $12~~revenues.~~3 million~~ ~~of the~~Unallocated ~~previous~~corporate ~~accrual,~~expenses originally established in 1996. The primary reasons for the significant reduction in the accrual were the passage of time of not closing stores earlier, many of the stores now will be closed at the end of their lease terms, and ~~the shift in strategy in that only surfacing equipment~~ ~~would~~classification betotals ~~removed~~are ~~from~~shown ~~full-service stores~~ as ~~opposed~~a topercentage ~~the original plan~~ of ~~completely~~ ~~removing~~total ~~labs~~net revenues.

In fiscal 1999, the Company determined that it no longer planned to remove any labs from Pearle stores. Since there were no costs accrued at January 30, 1999 related to closing of any in-store labs, this revision had no effect on the restructuring reserves in fiscal 1999.


	Fiscal Year
	2003			2002			2001
Gross margin:
Cole Vision		60.2	%		62.0	%		62.1	%
Things Remembered		70.8	%		71.0	%		71.2	%
Total gross margin		62.7	%		64.1	%		64.3	%
Operating expenses:
Cole Vision		57.5	%		58.5	%		59.8	%
Things Remembered		63.2	%		65.4	%		62.0	%
Unallocated corporate expense		2.9	%		1.5	%		0.9	%
Total operating expenses		61.7	%		61.6	%		61.2	%
Goodwill and tradename amortization:
Cole Vision		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.5	%
Things Remembered		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.3	%
Total goodwill and tradename amortization		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.5	%
Operating income:
Cole Vision		2.7	%		3.5	%		1.8	%
Things Remembered		7.6	%		5.6	%		8.9	%
Unallocated corporate expense		-2.9	%		-1.5	%		-0.9	%
Total operating income		1.0	%		2.5	%		2.7	%

~~For~~ As ~~the~~used ~~restructuring~~in ~~charge~~Item 7 ~~recorded~~of inthis ~~1998~~Form ~~approximately~~10-K, ~~$5.8 million represented~~same store sales growth is a non-GAAP financial measure, which includes deferred warranty sales on a cash ~~charges~~basis and undelivered $8customer orders, and does not reflect provisions for returns, remakes and certain other items.~~0 million~~ ~~represented~~The Company’s current systems do not gather data on these items on an individual store basis. Adjustments to the cash ~~outlays~~basis ~~through~~sales ~~January 29,~~information ~~2000~~accumulated at the store level are made for these items on an aggregate basis. AtAs ~~January 29~~a retailer, ~~2000~~the Company believes that a measure of same store sales performance is important to investors and ~~February 3,~~management ~~2001,~~for understanding ~~there~~its operations. The Company calculates same store sales for ~~were~~stores noopened ~~balances~~for ~~remaining~~at least twelve months. A reconciliation of same store sales to net revenue is presented below in the ~~restructure~~section ~~reserves~~“Reconciliation of Same Store Sales Growth”. Same store sales growth follows:

~~The unusual charges in fiscal 1998 related to the writeoff of $8.8 million associated with the abandonment of previously capitalized system development costs (including $1.~~9 ~~million of incurred costs that will be paid~~ ~~in the first half of fiscal 1999) and $2.7 million primarily related to restricted stock issued to two senior executive officers.~~

New Accounting Pronouncements


	Fiscal Year
	2003			2002			2001
Sears Optical (U.S.)		3.8	%		2.0	%		3.2	%
Target Optical		18.5	%		27.8	%		19.3	%
BJ’s Optical		11.8	%		1.9	%		4.3	%
Cole Licensed Brands (U.S.)		5.7	%		3.7	%		3.8	%
Pearle Vision Company-owned (U.S.)		0.8	%		4.0	%		2.6	%
Total Cole Vision		3.8	%		3.3	%		2.6	%
Things Remembered		3.7	%		(2.5	)%		(1.8	)%
Total Cole National		3.7	%		1.8	%		1.4	%
Pearle Vision U.S. franchise stores		(0.3	)%		1.1	%		0.0	%

In Same ~~June 1998,~~store ~~the~~sales ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, “Accounting~~ for ~~Derivative~~ ~~Instruments~~Pearle ~~and Hedging Activities” (as amended by SFAS No~~U. ~~137)~~S. ~~SFAS~~ ~~No. 133~~franchise ~~must~~stores ~~first~~is bea ~~applied~~non-GAAP infinancial measure ~~the first quarter of fiscal years~~ that ~~begin~~ ~~after~~is ~~June 15,~~provided ~~2000 (the first quarter of fiscal 2001~~ for ~~the~~comparative ~~Company) and~~purposes in general requires that entities recognize all derivative financial instruments as assets or liabilities, measured at fair value, and include in earnings the changes in the fair value of such assets and liabilities in either operations or comprehensive income (loss)only. The Company ~~does not presently~~believes ~~utilize derivative instruments, either for hedging or other purposes, and therefore it is expected~~ that ~~the~~its ~~adoption~~franchisees’ ofmethod ~~the requirements~~ of ~~SFAS~~reporting ~~No. 133 will~~sales ~~not~~is ~~impact~~consistent ~~the~~on ~~Company’s~~a ~~financial statements~~year-to-year basis.

InNet ~~December 1999, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission~~Revenues ~~issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), “Revenue Recognition in~~ ~~Financial Statements.” SAB 101 provides guidance on applying generally~~ ~~accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition. The Company adopted~~ ~~the provisions of this bulletin in fiscal 2000. The adoption did not impact the Company’s recognition of revenue in fiscal 2000.~~

9Consolidated Operations

~~Forward-Looking~~ Net ~~Information~~revenues were $1,201.8 million in fiscal 2003, compared with $1,148.1 million in fiscal 2002 and $1,109.1 million in fiscal 2001. Compared to the same period the previous year, net revenues increased 4.7% in fiscal 2003 and 3.5% in fiscal 2002, primarily attributable to a 3.7% and 1.8% increase in same store sales in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively and an increase in revenues from managed vision care programs in both years. Also impacting the change in net revenues is the number of stores open. There were 2,925 locations open at the end of fiscal 2003, compared to 2,944 and 2,919 open at the end of fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively.

~~The~~Cole ~~Company’s~~Vision ~~management has stated that it expects its strong emphasis~~Segment ~~on becoming better retailers to have an ongoing positive impact on the~~ ~~Company’s results in fiscal 2001, enabling the Company to continue the~~ ~~earnings turnaround that began with fiscal fourth quarter 2000. While we~~ expect first quarter 2001 operating earnings to improve compared to the first quarter last year, we do not expect the first quarter’s comparable store sales to be as strong as in the fourth quarter 2000. During first quarter 2000, sales were stimulated by highly promotional activities at Pearle and Things Remembered which were not repeated this year. Nevertheless, management expects net income will more than double in fiscal 2001 from fiscal 2000, even after taking into account the significant losses associated with the Target expansion program and the absence of a 53rd week. Achieving these results assumes, among other things, that the current economic environment does not worsen.

~~Certain~~ Cole ~~sections~~Vision ofrevenues ~~this~~were ~~Form~~$919.5 ~~10-K~~million ~~Report,~~in ~~including~~fiscal ~~this Management’s Discussion and Analysis~~2003, ~~contain~~compared ~~forward-looking statements within the~~with ~~meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995~~$877.5 million ~~Actual results may differ materially from those forecast due to a variety of factors that can adversely affect operating results, liquidity~~ and ~~financial~~$836.8 million ~~condition, such as risks associated with the timing and achievement of improvements~~ in ~~the operations~~fiscal of2002 ~~the optical business, the success of new store openings~~ and ~~the~~ ~~rate~~fiscal ~~at which new stores achieve profitability~~2001, ~~the Company’s ability to select~~respectively, an ~~stock~~increase ~~and~~compared ~~price merchandise attractive~~ to ~~customers, success of systems development and integration, competition in~~ the ~~optical~~same ~~industry, integration~~period ~~of acquired businesses, economic and weather factors affecting consumer spending, operating factors affecting customer satisfaction, including manufacturing quality of optical and engraved goods,~~ the ~~Company’s relationships~~previous ~~with~~year ~~host stores and franchisees, the mix~~ of ~~goods sold, pricing and other competitive factors, and the seasonality of the business~~4. ~~Forward-looking~~8% ~~statements are made based upon management’s expectations~~ and ~~beliefs~~ ~~concerning future events impacting Cole National Group~~4. ~~All~~9%, ~~forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty~~respectively.

~~Item~~ In 7afiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, the revenue increase of 4.8% ~~Quantitative~~was primarily due to increased revenues at Cole Licensed Brands and ~~Qualitative~~from ~~Disclosures~~managed vision ~~About~~care ~~Market~~programs, ~~Risk~~partially offset by revenue decreases at Pearle Vision U.S. The increase in Cole Licensed Brands revenues was attributable to same store sales increases at all brands and an increase in the number of store locations, primarily at Target Optical. Same store sales at Cole Licensed Brands were driven by increases in the average transaction size and an increase in the number of transactions. A continuing focus on selling premium products and additional features were the key factors in the average transaction size increase. The increase in the number of transactions was due to increases at Target Optical and BJ’s Optical, partially offset by a transaction decrease at Sears Optical. Revenues from managed vision care programs were higher than last year primarily due to an increase in the number of capitated plans sold to employers, health plans and associations, and increased laser procedure volume. Although revenues decreased at Pearle Vision Company-owned stores, same store sales in fiscal 2003 increased 0.8% due to an increase in the average transaction size partially offset by a decrease in the number of transactions. Improved merchandise assortment and selling skills at the store level and rollout of a new Pearle Preferred Credit Card are the primary drivers of the increase in average transaction size. The Company believes that the decrease in the number of transactions is due primarily to the increasingly competitive and promotional nature of the optical retail industry. Offsetting the same store sales increases at Pearle Vision were a lower number of Company-owned stores. Pearle Vision operated 21 fewer Company-owned stores at the end of fiscal 2003 than it did at the end of fiscal 2002, due to the net sale of 11 Company stores to franchisees, the closure of 15 stores and the opening of 5 new stores. The Company is continuing to divest Company-owned stores in markets that are predominantly franchised in order to lower its store supervision costs, and provide growth opportunities for franchisees already operating in those markets.

~~The~~ In ~~Company~~fiscal is2002 ~~exposed~~compared to ~~market~~fiscal ~~risk~~2001, ~~from~~the ~~changes~~revenue inincrease ~~foreign~~of ~~currency~~4.9% was ~~exchange~~due ~~rates,~~to ~~which~~increased ~~could~~revenues ~~impact~~at ~~its~~Cole ~~results~~Licensed ofBrands, ~~operations~~Pearle ~~and~~Vision ~~financial condition~~U.S. ~~Foreign~~and increased ~~exchange~~revenues ~~risk~~from ~~arises~~managed ~~from~~vision ~~the~~care ~~Company’s~~programs. ~~exposure~~The increase in Cole ~~fluctuations~~Licensed inBrands ~~foreign~~revenues ~~currency~~was ~~exchange~~attributable ~~rates~~to ~~because~~same ~~The~~store ~~Company’s~~sales increases at ~~reporting~~Sears ~~currency~~Optical isand Target Optical and an increase in the ~~United~~number ~~States~~of ~~dollar~~store locations, primarily at Target Optical. ~~Management~~These ~~seeks~~same tostore ~~minimize~~sales increases were ~~the~~driven ~~exposure~~by toincreased ~~foreign~~average ~~currency~~transaction ~~fluctuations~~size ~~through~~and ~~natural~~sales ~~internal~~of accessories. New ~~offsets~~premium toproduct ~~the~~introductions ~~fullest~~at ~~extent~~both ~~possible.~~Sears Optical and Target Optical, partially offset by increased sales of contact

lenses, were a key factor in the average selling price increase. Same store sales increased 4.0% at Pearle Vision Company-owned U.S. stores, primarily reflecting an increase in average transaction size. Improved merchandise assortment and selling skills at the store level have resulted in a higher rate of multi-pair purchases and increased sales of additional features. Cole Managed Vision revenues also increased from the prior year, due to increases in claims revenue and administrative service only (ASO) fees and the addition of laser procedure revenue.

Things Remembered Segment

Things Remembered revenues were $282.3 million in fiscal 2003, compared with $270.6 million and $272.3 million in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively, a 4.3% increase and 0.6% decrease compared to the same period the previous year, respectively.

In fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, a same store sales increase of 3.7% and a 44% increase in direct channel revenues were the primary reason for the increase in revenues. Direct channel revenues include revenues from its e-commerce site, www.ThingsRemembered.com, revenues from Things Remembered catalogs, and revenues generated through third party partner programs. Improvements in the average transaction size were partially offset by a lower number of transactions and from a reduction in the number of stores operating. There were 728 Things Remembered store locations operating at the end of fiscal 2003, compared to 770 at the end of fiscal 2002. The reduction was due primarily to the Company’s decision to allow the leases at under- performing stores to expire.

In fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001, the decrease in net revenues of 0.6% was primarily due to a same store sales decrease of 2.5% and a lower number of stores operating than the prior year. Store count at fiscal year end decreased from 774 to 770. The same store sales decrease was primarily attributable to a slowdown in mall traffic during fiscal 2002. Demand for business award and recognition gifts also decreased during the year due to changes in general economic conditions. Decreases in customer count were partially offset by increases in average transaction size and a 36% growth in the still relatively small direct channel business.

Gross Margin

Consolidated Operations

Gross margin was $753.0 million in fiscal 2003, compared with $735.9 million in fiscal 2002 and $713.7 million in fiscal 2001. Compared to the same period the previous year, gross margin dollars increased 2.3% in fiscal 2003 and 3.1% in fiscal 2002, primarily attributable to an increase in net revenues, partially offset by a decrease in the gross margin rate. The gross margin rate was 62.7% in fiscal 2003, compared with 64.1% in fiscal 2002 and 64.3% in fiscal 2001.

Cole Vision Segment

Gross margin was $553.3 million in fiscal 2003, compared to $543.8 million in fiscal 2002 and $519.9 million in fiscal 2001, an increase of gross margin dollars of 1.7% and 4.6% compared to the same period the previous year, respectively, due to increased revenues, partially offset by a decrease in the gross margin rate. Gross margin, as a percent of net revenues, was 60.2%, 62.0% and 62.1% in fiscal 2003, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively.

In fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, the Cole Vision gross margin rate decreased by 1.8 percentage points due to decreases in the gross margin rate in all businesses. Cole Managed Vision gross margin rate decreased due to a shift in revenue mix toward more funded programs from fee-for-service programs and higher benefit utilization by plan members within funded programs, which decreases the gross margin rate. In the Canadian operations, the Company closed its manufacturing and distribution facility in Toronto, Canada in the second quarter of fiscal 2003. The operations of this facility have been absorbed by the Company’s facility in Knoxville, TN. As part of the integration of the Canadian operations in the Knoxville lab, the Company changed the Canadian product assortment. As a result, the Company recorded a $0.3 million charge for obsolescence of inventory. The obsolescence charge, in addition to more aggressive promotions, unfavorable exchange rates and change in product assortment toward more premium products, which carry a lower gross margin rate, resulted in a $1.3 million lower gross margin from the Company’s Canadian operations. Cole Licensed Brands gross margin rate decreased and was impacted by higher obsolescence costs, higher costs associated with a shift toward lower gross margin rate premium product, a lower contact lens gross margin rate and an increase in discounts and other pricing promotions. The increase in obsolescence was due to a larger quantity of new product introductions in fiscal 2003, compared to previous years. The decrease in the contact lens gross margin rate was due primarily to increased selling of annual supplies to customers, which is a lower gross margin rate transaction and pricing actions taken in response to competition. Pearle Vision gross margin, as a percent of net revenues, decreased slightly due to an increased mix of sales of products to franchisees

compared to revenues from Company-owned stores, compared to the prior year. Sales to franchisees carry a lower gross margin rate than revenues from Company-owned stores, but offer benefits to the Company, including producing a more uniform merchandise assortment and a consistent brand look across all stores. Partially offsetting this gross margin rate decrease at Pearle Vision was higher product gross margin at Company-owned stores and lower manufacturing costs compared to the prior year. Lower manufacturing costs were achieved through in-store lab cost reductions and reduced costs of insurance and workers compensation.

In fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001, the decrease in gross margin rate was attributable to a change in sales mix at both Pearle Vision and Cole Licensed Brands. At Pearle Vision, the decrease in gross margin rate was attributable to an increased mix of sales of product to franchisees, compared to sales at Company-owned stores. Additionally, Pearle Vision’s mix of contact lens sales increased, which also contributed to a decrease in the gross margin rate. At Cole Licensed Brands, the decrease in gross margin rate was attributable to the increased sales of premium product and saleable accessories. Accessories, which include lens cleaner, lens cloth, clips and other products designed to care for optical purchases, and premium products, generally are sold at lower gross margin rates. In addition, Cole Licensed Brands made a strategic decision to lower retail prices of contact lenses in fiscal 2002 to become more competitive. The price decrease was a key factor in the gross margin rate decrease at Cole Licensed Brands. Partially offsetting the decrease in gross margin rate were improvements at Cole Managed Vision, where underwriting gain as a percentage of sales improved due to pricing initiatives on new and existing business and lower benefit utilization by plan members.

Things Remembered Segment

Gross margin was $199.7 million in fiscal 2003, $192.1 million in fiscal 2002 and $193.8 million in fiscal 2001. Compared to the same period the previous year, fiscal 2003 had an increase of 4.0% and fiscal 2002 had a decrease of 0.9% primarily driven by the same store sales performance and changes in the gross margin rate. Gross margin as a percent of net revenues was 70.8% in fiscal 2003, 71.0% in fiscal 2002 and 71.2% in fiscal 2001. The gross margin rate decrease in fiscal 2003, compared to the prior year, was due primarily to reduced revenues from gift personalization. The gross margin rate decrease in fiscal 2002, compared to the prior year, was due primarily to an increased mix in direct channel revenues, including shipping revenue, which has a lower gross margin rate than revenues from stores.

Operating Expenses

Consolidated Operations

Operating expenses were $741.0 million in fiscal 2003, compared with $707.6 million in fiscal 2002, and $679.0 million in fiscal 2001. Compared to the prior year, the increase in fiscal 2003 was 4.7% and the increase in fiscal 2002 was 4.2%. Of the increase in fiscal 2003, $16.5 million is attributable to the operating segments and $16.9 million is attributable to unallocated corporate expenses. Of the increase in fiscal 2002, $20.7 million is attributable to the operating segments and $7.9 million is attributable to unallocated corporate expenses. As discussed in detail below, certain unusual items affected the Company’s operating expenses during these periods. The Company defines unusual items as transactions that are non-comparable or infrequent in nature, including significant one time transactions unrelated to core operations and special charges and impairments. Management believes that operating expenses excluding unusual items is a useful measure for understanding trends in core operations and excludes some of these items in the management bonus plans. Operating expenses excluding unusual items is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be used as a substitute for the directly comparable GAAP financial measure. In order to facilitate an understanding of such unusual items and their effect on the results of the operations, the following table is provided as a reconciliation of reported operating expense to operating expense excluding certain unusual items.


	Fiscal Year									Change Fav/(Unfav)
										2003 vs.			2002 vs.
(Dollars in millions)	2003			2002			2001			2002			2001
Operating expenses, as reported	$	741.0		$	707.6		$	679.0		$	(33.4	)	$	(28.6	)
Unusual items:
CEO Retirement		9.2			—			—
Legal & professional fees for restatement & SEC investigation		2.2			—			—
Shareholder litigation settlement		2.7			—			—
Audit fees for restatement		1.8			3.4			—
Legal fees for California litigation		4.6			3.5			—
POS software impairment		2.5			—			—
Gain on sale of aircraft		(1.0	)		—			—
Restructuring charge		—			1.1			—
Closure of corporate office		—			0.3			—
Things Remembered class action settlement		—			1.1			—

Total unusual items		22.0			9.4			—

Operating expenses, excluding unusual items	$	719.0		$	698.2		$	679.0		$	(20.8	)	$	(19.2	)

Operating expenses, excluding unusual items, as a percent of total net revenues		59.8	%		60.8	%		61.2	%		1.0	%		0.4	%
Operating expense, as reported, as a percent of total net revenues		61.7	%		61.6	%		61.2	%		(0.1	)%		(0.4	)%

Unusual Items

The Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer retired at the annual meeting of shareholders on June 25, 2003 and the Company fulfilled its obligations, including certain contingent obligations, under his employment agreement and for retirement and life insurance benefits. These obligations required a one-time cash payment of $11.9 million with a charge to operating expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2003 of $9.2 million.

Cole National Corporation announced on October 8, 2003 that its Board of Directors had formed a Special Committee of independent directors on July 28, 2003 to evaluate the Company’s strategic alternatives, including a possible merger or sale of the Company, a corporate restructuring or other alternatives. The Parent and Luxottica Group S.p.A. entered into a definitive merger agreement on January 23, 2004 with the unanimous approval of the Boards of Directors of both companies. (See Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.) Costs related to legal, advisory and other professional expenses related to the evaluation of strategic alternatives and the negotiation of the definitive merger agreement are recorded at the Parent.

In fiscal 2003, the Company incurred incremental charges of $2.2 million for legal and professional fees related to the reaudit and restatement of its financial statements and the resulting SEC investigation, net of reimbursements received from insurance. Settlement costs related to the class action shareholder lawsuit, alleging claims of various violations of federal securities laws related to the Company’s publicly reported revenues and earnings totaled $2.7 million. Audit fees attributable to the restatement and reaudit were $1.8 million in fiscal 2003 and $3.4 million in fiscal 2002.

The Company and its optical subsidiaries have been sued by the State of California. (See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Legal costs associated with the defense of this matter totaled $4.6 million in fiscal 2003, and $3.5 million in fiscal 2002.

Other charges incurred in fiscal 2003 include a $2.5 million charge related to the impairment of point of sale (POS) software purchased by the Company in 1999 and never deployed. During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company decided to indefinitely delay further development. The Company sold its aircraft in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and recorded a $1.0 million gain.

The Company recorded $1.1 million for severance costs for a restructuring in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. The restructuring charge was related to a reduction in workforce of 60 individuals in the corporate office and field management. The Company also recorded a charge of $0.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 related to the closing of the corporate office and relocating it to the Company’s facility in Twinsburg, Ohio.

Things Remembered incurred legal and settlement costs of $1.1 million related to the settlement of a class action complaint in California involving overtime compensation in fiscal 2002. (See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Unallocated Corporate Expenses

Unallocated corporate expenses were $34.3 million in fiscal 2003, compared to $17.4 million for fiscal 2002 and $9.5 million for fiscal 2001. Included in unallocated corporate expense are all of the unusual items listed above except for the California litigation charges, which is recorded in the Cole Vision segment and the Things Remembered class action settlement. The unusual items included in unallocated corporate expenses totaled $17.4 million and $4.8 million in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively.

In fiscal 2003 unallocated corporate expenses included compensation expense of $3.2 million for variable stock options having a feature permitting the use of vested options in payment of the exercise price. In fiscal 2003, certain stock options were exercised by using this feature. Previous to fiscal 2003, such options had been accounted for as fixed grants based on the presumption that this feature would not be utilized as evidence by the Company’s historical experience of this feature not being used, therefore no compensation expense was recorded. The utilization of this feature in fiscal year 2003 created an arrangement that requires variable accounting, beginning with the third quarter of fiscal 2003. The Company incurred in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 incremental management bonus expense of $1.5 million and professional and legal fees of $1.1 million related to management changes and management initiatives. The Company incurred incremental audit and professional fees of $0.8 million compared to the same period last year due to higher audit costs and higher expenses incurred to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Partially offsetting these increased expenses were $1.0 million lower expenses for continuing group medical and basic life insurance for a group of former employees covered under a postemployment benefit agreement, due to a lower number of participants covered under the agreement and lower overhead costs from the reduction in workforce.

In fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001, the Company recorded incremental costs of $1.2 million for continuing group medical and basic life insurance coverage for a group of employees covered under a postemployment benefits agreement. The Company recorded incremental legal fees of $0.9 million for general matters.

Cole Vision Segment

Operating expenses were $528.4 million in fiscal 2003, compared to $513.2 million for fiscal 2002 and $500.7 million for fiscal 2001. Compared to the same period the previous year, fiscal 2003 had an increase of 3.0% and fiscal 2002 had an increase of 2.5%. Operating expenses as a percent of net revenues decreased at Cole Vision by 1.0 points in fiscal 2003 and 1.3 points in fiscal 2002, compared to prior years. Included in operating expenses is the unusual item of California litigation charges described above which totaled $4.6 million and $3.5 million in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively.

In applying Statements of Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” (SFAS 144), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, the Company evaluates the operating performance of each of its locations at least once per year or whenever there is a change in events or circumstances. Cole Vision recorded impairment charges of $1.7 million in fiscal 2003, compared to $0.4 million in fiscal 2002 and $2.8 million in fiscal 2001. The impairment charges are due to declining revenues primarily at certain Pearle Vision stores. Since the evaluation is made annually it is not considered by the Company to be an unusual item.

In fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, store payroll and rent and occupancy costs at Cole Vision were $8.3 million and $3.6 million higher, respectively, to support increases in net revenues. Store payroll and rent and occupancy costs, as a percent of net revenues, were lower in fiscal 2003 compared to the same period last year. Operating expenses from the Company’s Canadian operations were $3.2 million higher in fiscal 2003 compared to the same period last year. The increase in operating expense was due primarily to costs associated with the closure of its manufacturing and distribution facility in Toronto, Canada, higher store payroll, depreciation, and unfavorable exchange rates. At Cole Managed Vision, claims processing costs were $2.5 million higher than the previous year. Included in claims processing costs were $1.6 million of incremental costs related to the Company’s compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), $1.3 million of incremental systems amortization and higher costs due to an increase in claim volume. These increases were partially offset by lower bad debt expense and printed material costs compared to the same period last year. In addition, savings were realized from lower bonus expense and reduction of processing fees paid to MetLife. Pearle Vision recorded a $0.6 million charge for assets disposed in a prior period. Partially offsetting the expense increases in fiscal 2003 were savings from lower store advertising and field supervision expenses. Fiscal 2002 results included charges of $1.0 million for the closure of 12 Target Optical stores. Pearle Vision recorded $2.5 million in fiscal 2003 related to gains on the sale of 15 Company-owned locations to franchisees. This compared to a $0.7 million gain on the sale of 8 stores in fiscal 2002.

In fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001, store payroll and rent and occupancy charges at Cole Vision were $7.3 million and $1.6 million higher, respectively, supporting increases in net revenues and increases in the number of Target Optical stores open. Store payroll and rent and occupancy costs, as a percent of net revenues, were lower in fiscal 2002 compared to the prior year. Operating expenses at Cole Licensed Brands decreased as a percent to sales compared to the prior year due primarily to improvements at Target Optical. Fiscal 2002 results included a charge of $1.0 million for the closure of 12 Target Optical stores. Pension expense was $1.0 million lower than the prior year at Cole Vision due to the Company’s decision to freeze the defined benefit pension plan. (See Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Operating expenses at Cole Managed Vision decreased as a percent of sales compared to prior year primarily due to the reduction of processing fees paid to MetLife as claims processing was converted to the Company’s internal systems at a lower cost per claim.

Things Remembered Segment

Operating expenses were $178.3 million in fiscal 2003, compared to $177.0 million for the same period last year and $168.8 million in fiscal 2001. Compared to the same period the previous year, fiscal 2003 had an increase of 0.7% and fiscal 2002 had an increase of 4.9%. Operating expenses as a percent of net revenues decreased 2.2 points in fiscal 2003 and increased 3.4 points in fiscal 2002, compared to prior years. Included in operating expenses is the unusual item of the class action settlement described above which totaled $1.1 million in fiscal 2002.

Applying SFAS 144, Things Remembered recorded impairment charges of $0.2 million in fiscal 2003, compared to $0.5 million in fiscal 2002 and $0.9 million in fiscal 2001. The impairment charges are due to declining revenues and operating performance at certain Things Remembered stores. Since the evaluation is made annually it is not considered by the Company to be an unusual item.

In fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, store rent and occupancy charges increased $1.5 million primarily due to a higher mix of inline mall locations than kiosks. Inline mall locations generally incur higher rent and occupancy costs than kiosks due to greater square footage requirements. Rent and occupancy costs, as a percent of net revenues, were lower by 0.3 points in fiscal 2003 than the same period last year. Things Remembered accrued higher management bonuses, totaling $1.7 million and incurred incremental advertising costs in support of higher net revenues, totaling $1.7 million in fiscal 2003, compared to the same period last year. Things Remembered recorded lower store payroll costs in fiscal 2003, compared to the same period last year due to fewer stores operating and lower workers compensation costs. Store payroll costs, as a percent of net revenues, were lower in fiscal 2003 than the same period last year due to improvements in productivity. Things Remembered realized savings totaling $1.4 million from lower non-store payroll, due primarily to workforce reductions taken in fiscal 2002. Things Remembered also realized savings from lower travel, meetings, store depreciation, field supervision and systems development expenses.

In fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001, store rent and occupancy charges increased $3.1 million primarily due to a higher mix of inline mall locations than kiosks and increases in insurance, taxes and other common areas charges. Store wage costs at Things Remembered increased $2.3 million due to higher average hourly wage rates and increases in benefits and workers compensation. Non-store overhead also included costs of $0.5 million for a new store point of sales system, the implementation of which was subsequently delayed indefinitely. Severance costs related to a senior Things Remembered executive totaled $0.3 million.

Goodwill and Tradename Amortization

The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142), in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead, be subject to at least an annual review for impairment. With the adoption of this statement, the Company ceased amortization of goodwill and tradenames as of February 3, 2002. The Company recorded a $5.0 million goodwill and tradename amortization charge in fiscal 2001. Of this amount, $4.1 million was attributable to Cole Vision and $0.9 million to Things Remembered.

Operating Income

Consolidated Operations

Operating income was $12.0 million, $28.3 million and $29.7 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. In fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, increases in unallocated corporate expenses totaling $16.9 million and lower gross margin rate from the Cole Vision segment were the primary reason for the decrease in operating results, offsetting improvements at Things Remembered. In fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001, a decline in operating income at Things Remembered, increases in unallocated corporate

expenses totaling $7.9 million and legal costs associated with the California Attorney General’s action offset improvements at Cole Vision.

Cole Vision Segment

Operating income at Cole Vision was $24.9 million, $30.6 million and $15.1 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease in operating income at Cole Vision in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002, was due to a lower gross margin rate, the costs associated with the closure of the Company’s Canadian lab and manufacturing facility, the increase in impairment costs, the decrease in net revenues at Pearle Vision and increased costs of legal fees related to the California lawsuit. These items were partially offset by improved net revenues at Cole Licensed Brands and Cole Managed Vision and improvements in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues.

The increase in operating income in fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001 was due to the revenue increase and lower expenses as a percent of net revenues. Results at Target Optical improved as the focus changed from aggressive growth to measured growth and improved operations. The cessation of goodwill and tradename amortization resulted in $4.1 million lower expense in fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001. In addition, the growth in revenue and improved claims management efficiencies resulted in higher operating income at Cole Managed Vision. These improvements were partially offset by the incremental $3.5 million in legal costs associated with the California litigation.

Things Remembered Segment

Operating income at Things Remembered was $21.4 million, $15.1 million and $24.1 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in operating income at Things Remembered in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 was due to increases in net revenues, improvements in store operating expenses as a percent of net revenues, and savings from workforce reductions, non-recurring legal costs, travel, meetings, field supervision and systems development expenses. These improvements were partially offset by the lower gross margin rate, and higher advertising, management bonus, and store rent and occupancy cost increases.

The decrease in operating income in fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001 was due to reductions in revenue, higher store rent and occupancy costs, higher store payroll and non-store expenses.

Interest and Other (Income) Expense

Interest and other (income) expense, net was $23.5 million, $36.4 million and $24.9 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Fiscal 2002 results include a loss of $11.1 million on early extinguishment of debt. The charge represents the payment of premiums and other costs of retiring Cole National Group’s 9-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 and the write-offs of unamortized discount and deferred financing fees.

The Company recorded interest expense of $25.0 million, $26.3 million and $27.8 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The reduction in interest expense was primarily due to the replacement of the $150.0 million 9-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the issuance of 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes in May 2002 and the favorable impact of the interest rate swap agreements. See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Interest and other income, net was $1.5 million, $1.1 million and $3.0 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company recorded interest income, primarily from temporary investments and franchise interest income, totaling $1.4 million, $1.2 million and $2.3 million in fiscal 2003, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively. The Company recognized a gain of $0.8 million from the sale of a Dallas, Texas facility in the first quarter of fiscal 2001.

Income Tax Rate

The effective income tax rate was 31.7% in fiscal 2003 compared with 103.1%, excluding the impact of the early extinguishment of debt in fiscal 2002, and 110.6% in fiscal 2001. The lower effective tax rate in fiscal 2003, compared to fiscal 2002 was primarily due to the impact of certain non-deductible expenses. The lower effective tax rate in fiscal 2002, compared to fiscal 2001 was primarily due to the elimination of goodwill amortization pursuant to the new accounting standard and a reduction in the provision for valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets for charitable contribution carryforwards. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

Reconciliation of Same Store Sales Growth

Same store sales growth is a non-GAAP financial measure, which includes deferred warranty sales on a cash basis and undelivered customer orders, and does not reflect provisions for returns, remakes and certain other items. The Company’s current systems do not gather data on these items on an individual store basis. Adjustments to the cash basis sales information accumulated at the store level are made for these items on an aggregate basis. As a retailer, the Company believes that a measure of same store performance is important to investors and management for understanding its operations. The Company calculates same store sales for stores opened for at least twelve months. A reconciliation of same store sales to revenue reported on a GAAP basis follows:


	2003			2002			2001
	(Dollars in thousands)
Current year same store sales	$	1,041,574		$	993,776		$	961,240
Prior year same store sales⁽¹⁾		1,004,133			976,291			948,060
Percent change		3.7	%		1.8	%		1.4	%
Current year same store sales	$	1,041,574		$	993,776		$	961,240
Adjustment for:
Sales at new and closed stores		15,261			30,185			25,510
Deferred revenue		(3,678	)		(2,701	)		(1,846	)
Order vs. customer receipt		24			(478	)		4,341
Returns, remakes and refunds		46			(1,183	)		(751	)
Other		325			(37	)		188

Store sales		1,053,552			1,019,562			988,682
Nonstore revenues		178,517			157,042			146,631
Intercompany eliminations		(30,296	)		(28,485	)		(26,190	)

GAAP Basis Net revenue	$	1,201,773		$	1,148,119		$	1,109,123

⁽¹⁾ Prior year same store sales differ from current year same store sales in the prior year due to store openings and closings.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s primary source of liquidity is funds provided from operations of its operating subsidiaries. On June 27, 2003, the Company’s operating subsidiaries amended, restated and extended their working capital line of credit. The maturity date of the credit facility was extended to February 1, 2007 from May 31, 2006. The size of the facility was adjusted to $60.0 million from $75.0 million. In addition, certain financial covenants were amended. As of fiscal year end 2003, the total commitment was $60.0 million and availability under the credit facility totaled $46.1 million after reduction for $13.9 million under letters of credit. There are no working capital borrowings outstanding as of January 31, 2004. The maximum amount outstanding was $11.5 million and the daily average borrowing during fiscal 2003 was approximately $848,000.

The credit facility, which is guaranteed by Cole National Corporation and the Company, requires the Company and its principal operating subsidiaries to comply with various operating covenants that restrict corporate activities, including covenants restricting the ability of the subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated indebtedness, dispose of certain investments or make acquisitions. The credit facility also requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including covenants regarding minimum interest coverage and maximum leverage. The Company is currently in compliance with the covenants in the credit agreement.

On November 3, 2003, Things Remembered, Inc. and the Parent entered into an agreement with a bank to provide documentary letters of credit for import inventory purchases not to exceed $7.0 million. The letters of credit are secured by the inventory purchased. As of January 31, 2004, the Company has $3.9 million outstanding under this facility.

On August 22, 1997, the Company issued $125.0 million of 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes that mature in 2007 with no earlier scheduled redemption or sinking fund payments.

On May 22, 2002, the Company issued $150.0 million of 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012. The notes are unsecured and mature on May 15, 2012. Net proceeds from the notes offering, together with cash on hand, were used to retire $150.0 million of 9-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 and pay premium and other costs associated with retiring those notes. A loss on early extinguishment of debt of $11.1 million representing the payment of premiums and other costs of retiring the notes and write-offs of unamortized discount and deferred financing fees, was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2002.

The indentures pursuant to which the 8-5/8% notes and the 8-7/8% notes were issued contain certain optional and mandatory redemption features and other financial covenants, including restrictions on the ability of the Company to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make other restricted payments to the Parent. The indentures also permit payments to the Parent for certain tax obligations and for administrative expenses not to exceed 0.25% of net sales. See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company may from time to time purchase its outstanding notes in the open market or refinance them, depending on capital market conditions. Following consummation of the Merger the holders of the 8-5/8% notes and the 8-7/8% notes will have the right to put the notes to the Company at a price of 101% of par plus accrued interest. If the holders exercise such right, the Company may be required to obtain financing from its parent or a third party to satisfy such obligation.

No significant principal payment obligations are due under the Company’s outstanding indebtedness until 2007, when the $125.0 million of 8-5/8% senior subordinated debt is due. The ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to satisfy their obligations will be primarily dependent upon the future financial and operating performance of the subsidiaries and upon the Parent’s ability to renew or refinance borrowings or raise additional capital through equity financing or sales of assets.

The Company maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers employees who have met eligibility service requirements and are not members of certain collective bargaining units. The pension plan calls for benefits to be paid to eligible employees at retirement, based primarily upon years of service and their compensation levels near retirement. In January 2002, the Company approved a plan freeze for all participants except for participants who are at least age 50 or older with 10 years of benefit service as of March 31, 2002. These participants had their average pay frozen as of March 31, 2002, and covered compensation frozen as of December 31, 2001, but their benefit service will continue to grow. The Company’s policy is to fund amounts necessary to keep the pension plan in full force and effect, in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

During fiscal 2003, the Company changed the discount rate used to calculate its projected benefit obligation from 6.5% to 6.0%. The change in the discount rate reflects the overall decline in market interest rates and has led to an increase in the projected benefit obligation at January 31, 2004. The increase in the obligation was partially offset by improvements in stock market performance, which increased the fair value of the pension plan’s assets. As a result of these factors, the pension plan was underfunded by $20.5 million as of January 31, 2004. The Company has recorded the increase in the minimum pension liability by charging $2.8 million to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholder’s equity. This charge will not impact the actual funding requirements of the plan or the Company’s compliance with debt covenants. The expected future funding requirement for fiscal 2004 is $7.5 million.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash and cash equivalents were $59.2 million at January 31, 2004 compared to $42.0 million at February 1, 2003 and $63.3 million at February 2, 2002. Operations generated net cash of $35.1 million, $39.3 million, and $51.9 million in fiscal 2003, fiscal 2002, and fiscal 2001, respectively. The Company incurred a net loss in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, which is described above in the Results of Operations section of this report. Depreciation and amortization was $39.8 million, $35.6 million and $38.9 million for fiscal 2003, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively. The increase in fiscal 2003, compared to fiscal 2002, was due primarily to higher systems development and capitalized software amortization, primarily for the Patriot Claims Management System. The decrease in fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001 was due primarily to the cessation of goodwill and tradename amortization. Gains from sales of assets were $1.0 million in fiscal 2003 and $0.8 million in fiscal 2001. These gains were attributable to the sale of the aircraft in fiscal 2003 and the gain on the sale of a Dallas, TX facility in the first quarter of fiscal 2001. Noncash impairment charges were $4.4 million, $0.9 million and $3.7 million in fiscal 2003, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively. Fiscal 2003 impairment charges included $2.5 million for point of sale software purchased in 1999, but never deployed. The remaining impairment charges resulted from the Company’s application of SFAS 144, which was described above in the Results of Operations section of this report. Noncash compensation totaled $3.7 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The change was due primarily for compensation expense for variable stock options. The change in the deferred income tax provision (benefit) was ($3.5) million in fiscal 2003, compared to ($2.5) million and $2.9 million in

fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively. Further information regarding deferred taxes is provided in Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Fiscal 2002 results included a loss of $11.1 million on early extinguishment of debt, described earlier in the Results of Operations. Noncash interest was $0.4 million, $1.2 million and $1.3 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The change was due primarily to the return on deferred compensation plan assets.

Changes in working capital resulted in a use of funds totaling $0.1 million in fiscal 2003 compared to a source of funds of $0.7 million in fiscal 2002 and a source of funds totaling $6.2 million in fiscal 2001. Changes in accounts and notes receivable and other assets resulted in a use of funds of $3.6 million in fiscal 2003, compared to a use of funds of $11.5 million in fiscal 2002 and $1.4 million in fiscal 2001. Increases in receivables at Cole Licensed Brands and receivables generated from the sale of franchise locations at Pearle Vision accounted for the majority of the use of cash in fiscal 2003, partially offset by lower receivables at Cole Managed Vision due to improved receivables collection. The $11.5 million use of cash in fiscal 2002 was due primarily to increased revenues and corresponding receivables at Cole Vision. Changes in inventories resulted in a source of cash totaling $1.0 million in fiscal 2002 and $9.6 million in fiscal 2001. During fiscal 2001, the Company undertook an extensive re-merchandising program at Pearle Vision, which contributed to the inventory reduction of $9.6 million. Changes in accounts payables and liabilities resulted in a source of cash totaling $4.1 million in fiscal 2003 and $9.1 million in fiscal 2002, compared to a use of cash totaling $2.2 million in fiscal 2001. The source of cash in fiscal 2003 was due primarily to increases in deferred revenues at Cole Licensed Brands. The source of cash in fiscal 2002 was due primarily to the increase in deferred revenues and to increases in liabilities for audit fees, retirement plans, benefit obligations and bonus accruals. Accrued and refundable income taxes used $0.4 million in fiscal 2003, compared to a source of funds of $0.7 million and $0.3 million in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. Further information regarding income taxes is provided in Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash from investing activities resulted in a use of funds of $33.5 million in fiscal 2003, compared to $46.6 million in fiscal 2002 and $28.9 million in fiscal 2001. Capital expenditures, which accounted for most of the cash used for investing, were $26.8 million, $39.4 million and $33.6 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The majority of capital expenditures were for remodeling of existing stores and store fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements for new stores, including the Target Optical expansion. The reduction in capital expenditures in fiscal 2003 was primarily at Cole Licensed Brands and Things Remembered, as the Company reduced its investment in new stores and remodeling. The increase in capital expenditures in fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001 was due to increased investment in Cole Licensed Brands for the Target Optical expansion and central lab investments, partially offset by lower capital expenditures at Pearle Vision as the Company reduced expenditures for new Pearle Vision stores. Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets totaled $2.6 million in fiscal 2003, $12.5 million in fiscal 2001 and $0 in fiscal 2002. The fiscal 2003 proceeds were due to the sale of the Company’s aircraft. In fiscal 2001, net proceeds of $12.5 million were received from the sale of two facilities no longer required for operations and from the sale and leaseback of Pearle Vision’s former headquarters office building in Dallas, Texas and a portion of the land. The Company paid $5.3 million, $5.6 million and $6.9 million for systems development costs in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Such costs have been capitalized and are being amortized over the systems’ estimated useful lives. The Company used $3.8 million, $1.6 million and $0.8 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, for contingent payments in connection with the prior acquisition of MetLife’s managed vision business.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $15.6 million in fiscal 2003 and $3.1 million in fiscal 2001. Net cash used for financing totaled $14.0 million fiscal 2002. In May 2002, the Company issued $150.0 million of 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due May 2012. The net proceeds of the issuance and cash on hand were used to retire all of the Company’s $150.0 million 9-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006. Finance fees and early repayment of the 9-7/8% notes resulted in a net cash usage of $14.2 million. Changes in overdraft balances used $6.7 million in funds in fiscal 2003, compared to a source from financing of $6.2 million and $7.9 million in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. The change in overdraft balances was due to the timing of payments. Advances from affiliates totaled $21.4 million in fiscal 2003, compared with advances to affiliates of $6.4 million and $4.3 million in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The Company believes that funds provided from operations, including cash on hand, along with funds available under the credit facility, will provide adequate sources of liquidity to allow its operating subsidiaries to continue to expand the number of stores and to fund capital expenditures and systems development costs. These expenditures are expected to be in the range of $35.0 to $40.0 million in fiscal 2004.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The Company leases a substantial portion of its equipment and facilities including laboratories, office and warehouse space, and retail locations. In addition, Cole Vision operates departments in various host stores and pays occupancy costs solely as a percentage of revenues. A more complete discussion of the Company’s lease and license commitments is included in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company guarantees future minimum lease payments for certain store locations leased directly by Pearle franchisees. The term of these guarantees range from one to ten years and many are limited to periods that are less than the full term of the leases involved. A more complete discussion of the Company’s guarantees is included in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company also subleases an office and general operating facility in Highland Heights, Ohio from the Parent who leases the property from a special purpose entity (the “Trust”), which was created in 1997 specifically for the purpose of structuring a four-year operating lease with annual renewal options up to six years. The lease provides for regular payments based on LIBOR plus 1.50%. In accordance with this agreement, the Parent must maintain compliance with a minimum net worth covenant. At the end of this lease in 2007, the Parent has the option to purchase the property or arrange for the sale of the property. If the Parent does not exercise its purchase option at the end of the lease, it is contingently liable to the Trust for up to $1.7 million. The Parent does not believe it will have any payment obligation at the end of the lease because either the Parent will exercise the purchase option, or the net proceeds from the sale of the property will exceed the amount payable to the Trust.

Under FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46) and revised FIN 46 (FIN 46R), certain special purpose entities are required to be consolidated if it is determined that an enterprise is the primary beneficiary because it is deemed to have controlling financial interest in the entity. The Company has determined that it has controlling financial interest in the Trust since the Company is required to absorb any expected losses, will receive the majority of expected residual returns and is the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the Trust assets of $2.2 million and liabilities of $2.2 million have been consolidated into the financial statements of the Company as of January 31, 2004. Future operating results of the Trust will be consolidated in the financial statements of the Company and is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or operations.

In fiscal 2000, the Company guaranteed certain borrowings of a franchisee with a bank in connection with the operations of two franchised stores. The maximum exposure under the agreement is $333,000 and expires upon full payment of the term loan borrowings by the franchisee. The term of the loan is until 2010.

In fiscal 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to guarantee a portion of the amount owed to a bank by a franchisee as a result of a loan granted in connection with the purchase of five stores. The guaranteed amount equals the cumulative value of the store assets. The Company is released from its obligation once the landlords of the store locations execute subordination agreements or the bank is granted access to the store assets in the event of the default by the franchisee. The maximum exposure under the agreement is $464,000 as of January 31, 2004.

The following table summarizes certain payments due by period for contractual obligations including operating leases:


	Payments Due by Period (dollars in thousands)
				Less Than									After
Contractual Obligations	Total			1 Year			1-3 Years			4-5 Years			5 Years
Long-term debt	$	275,000		$	—		$	125,000		$	—		$	150,000
Capital lease obligations, including interest		2,614			643			1,156			713			102
Debt of variable interest entity		2,452			196			410			1,846			—
Operating leases		346,628			77,244			117,465			74,913			77,006
Sublease agreements		(38,827	)		(10,456	)		(14,592	)		(7,904	)		(5,875	)
Long-term employee contract		3,035			865			1,805			365			—

Total contractual obligations	$	590,902		$	68,492		$	231,244		$	69,933		$	221,233

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of SFAS Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (SFAS 145). SFAS 145 states that the rescission of SFAS No. 4 shall be applied in fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt that was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented that does not meet the criteria in APB Opinion 30 for classification as an extraordinary item shall be reclassified as operating expenses. The Company adopted SFAS 145 as of the beginning of fiscal 2003. As a result, the loss on early extinguishment of debt reported as an extraordinary item for the year ended February 1, 2003 has been reclassified. The pretax loss from the early extinguishment of debt has been presented as a separate line within interest and other (income) expenses and the related income tax benefit reduced the reported income tax provision. Other portions of the statement are not applicable to the Company.

The FASB has also issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” (SFAS 143). SFAS 143 provides guidance for legal obligations arising from the retirement of long-lived assets. SFAS 143 was adopted in fiscal 2003 and did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or operations.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46) and revised FIN 46 (FIN 46R) in December 2003. The Interpretations requires certain variable interest entities, including certain special purpose entities, to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary if the equity investors in the entity do not have all the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk. The Interpretations immediately apply to entities created after January 31, 2003, are effective for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 for certain special purpose entities and are effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 for other existing variable interest entities. The synthetic operating lease for the Highland Heights, Ohio facility required consolidation under this Interpretation. The consolidation resulted in an additional $2.2 million in assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Management is still assessing the impacts of this Interpretation on its consolidated financial statements regarding existing variable interest entities within its franchise operations.

In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the FASB (“EITF”) reached a consensus on Issue 02-16, “Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor” (Issue 02-16), which addresses the accounting by a customer for consideration received from a vendor, including a reseller of the vendor’s products. Certain aspects of the issue were effective immediately, which were adopted and did not have a significant impact on results of operations in fiscal 2002. The remaining portion of Issue 02-16 was adopted during fiscal 2003 and did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (Revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits” (SFAS 132). This statement revises employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans to require more information about the economic resources and obligations of such plans. Certain disclosure provisions were effective for fiscal 2003, which were adopted. The remaining disclosure provisions of SFAS 132 will be adopted during fiscal 2004.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” SFAS 149, which amends and clarifies accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain embedded derivatives and for hedging activities under SFAS 133. SFAS 149 was adopted in fiscal 2003 and had no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) was signed into law. In accordance with FASB Staff Position 106-1, the Company’s measures of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes do not reflect the effects of the Act on the Company’s postretirement benefit plan. Specific authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy is pending and, when issued, could require the Company to change previously reported information.

Contingencies

The Company and its optical subsidiaries have been sued by the State of California, which alleges claims for various statutory violations related to the operation of 23 Pearle Vision Centers in California. The claims include untrue or misleading advertising, illegal dilation fees, unlawful advertising of eye exams, maintaining an optometrist on or near the premises of a registered dispensing optician, unlawful advertising of an optometrist, unlicensed practice of optometry, and illegal relationships between dispensing opticians, optical retailers and optometrists. The action seeks unspecified damages, restitution and injunctive relief. In July 2002, the

State of California obtained a preliminary injunction to enjoin certain advertising practices and from charging dilation fees. The trial court’s decision was appealed by both the Company and the State. On November 26, 2003, the appellate court ruled on the appeal in a manner adverse to the Company with respect to continued advertising in California by Pearle Vision that expressly or implicitly advertises the furnishing of optometric services, disallowing continued advertising of the availability of optometric services with a disclaimer that had been previously approved by the trial court. The appellate court ruled in the Company’s favor with respect to charging dilation fees. On March 3, 2004, the California Supreme Court granted the Company’s petition for review of the Appellate Court’s decision. Although the Company believes that its advertising and operational practices in California complied with California law, the appellate ruling may, if unmodified, compel the Company to modify or close its activities in California. Further, the Company might be required to pay damages and or restitution in a currently undeterminable amount, the cost of which might have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and cash flow in one or more periods.

Following the Company’s announcement in November 2002 of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements, the Securities and Exchange Commission began an investigation into the Company’s previous accounting. The course of this investigation or other litigation or investigations arising out of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements cannot be predicted. In addition, under certain circumstances the Company would be obliged to indemnify the individual current and former directors and officers who are named as defendants in litigation or who are or become involved in an investigation. The Company believes it has insurance that should be available with respect to a portion of its indemnification obligations. If the Company is unsuccessful in defending against the current investigation or any litigation,there may be a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.

As described in Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings”, the Company has been named as a defendant along with numerous other retailers, in patent infringement litigation challenging the defendants’ use of bar code technology. The Company believes it has available defenses and does not expect any liability. However, if the Company were to be found liable for an infringement, it might have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and cash flow in the period incurred.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in various other legal proceedings. The Company is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.

The Company and Target Corporation have reached an agreement to renew the agreement under which the Company operates licensed optical departments in Target stores with modified terms. As a result of the new agreement, the Company closed 25 Target Optical stores in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and will incur a charge of approximately $2.2 million related to store closing costs.

Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements requires the Company to estimate the effect of various matters that are inherently uncertain as of the date of the financial statements. Each of these required estimates varies in regard to the level of judgment involved and its potential impact on the Company’s reported financial results. Estimates are deemed significant when a different estimate could have reasonably been used or where changes in the estimate are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, and would materially impact the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations. The Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Critical estimates inherent in these accounting policies are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts

The Company records an allowance for uncollectible accounts to reflect management’s best estimate of losses inherent in its portfolio of receivables from Cole Licensed Brands’ host stores, Pearle Vision franchisees and managed vision care accounts. The allowance is established through a charge to the provision and represents amounts of current and past due receivable balances which management estimates will not be collectible. The Company calculates the allowance for uncollectible accounts using historical experience, current trends, credit policy and aging reports. An analysis, including historical performance, break-even analysis and payment arrangements is performed on delinquent accounts. The Company’s calculation is reviewed by management to assess whether additional consideration is required to appropriately estimate losses in the receivable portfolio. Management believes its receivables are adequately reserved under current conditions. Any significant deterioration in the economic environment could materially affect these expectations.

Valuation of Inventories

Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost, or market, with cost based on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, for the optical inventories and based on the weighted average cost method for the gift inventories. The Company records a reserve for future inventory cost markdowns to be taken for inventory not expected to be part of its ongoing merchandise offering. The reserve is estimated based on historical information regarding sell through for similar products. The Company records a reserve for estimated shrinkage based on various factors including sales volume, historical shrink results and current trends. Management believes its inventories are appropriately valued.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

Property and equipment, systems development, and other finite intangibles are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Useful lives are based on management’s estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. These assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An initial screening is performed on all long-lived assets. Store locations less than three years old and stores relocated within three years of fiscal year-end are excluded from testing. If the undiscounted future cash flows from the long-lived asset are less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes a loss equal to the difference between the discounted future cash flow and the carrying value. Management’s estimate of future cash flow is based on its experience, knowledge and market data. However, these estimates can be affected by factors such as future store profitability, real estate demand and economic conditions that can be difficult to predict.

Goodwill, noncompete agreements and tradename assets were amortized over their estimated useful economic life using the straight-line method and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Beginning with fiscal year 2002, all goodwill and tradename amortization ceased in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142). Both goodwill and tradenames are tested at least annually for impairment. The Company adopted the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter for the annual impairment review. The Company uses, amongst other things, the findings of an outside valuation advisor to assist with its impairment testing.

Valuation of Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Management regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability and establishes a valuation allowance for tax assets based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. In determining the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets, management estimates taxable income into the future. The assessment of whether or not a valuation allowance is required often requires significant judgment including the forecast of future taxable income and the evaluation of tax planning initiatives. Adjustments to the deferred tax valuation allowance are made to earnings in the period when such assessment is made.

Allowance for Remakes and Returns

Sales are recorded in accordance with the Company’s policy for revenue recognition and deferred revenue discussed in the summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Revenues have been reduced by allowances for remakes of product and returns. The estimated allowances are calculated as a percentage of sales and based upon historical return percentages.

Managed Vision Underwriting Results

The Company sells capitated managed vision care plans, which generally have duration of one year. Based upon its experience, the Company believes that it can predict utilization and claims experience, including estimates for claims incurred but not reported, under these plans with a high level of confidence. Underwriting results are recognized using an estimated percentage of claims revenue. Each quarter, a portion of the resulting gain is reserved for potential variances between predicted and actual results. The reserves are reconciled following the end of each plan year.

Self-Insurance Reserves

Due to the significant deductible under its insurance policies, the Company is primarily self-insured for property loss, workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability costs. The liabilities are determined actuarially based on claims filed and estimates for claims incurred but not reported. These liabilities are not discounted. In estimating the obligation associated with incurred losses, the

Company utilizes loss development factors prepared by independent third party actuaries. These development factors utilize historical data to project the future development of incurred losses. Loss estimates are adjusted based upon actual claims settlements and reported claims.

Defined Benefit Retirement Plans

The plan obligations and related assets of defined benefit retirement plans are presented in Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Plan assets, which consist primarily of marketable equity and debt instruments, are valued using market quotations. Plan obligations and annual pension expense are determined by independent actuaries and through the use of a number of assumptions. Key assumptions in measuring the plan obligations include the discount rate and the estimated future return on plan assets. In determining the discount rate, the Company utilizes the yield on high-quality, fixed income investments currently available with maturities corresponding to the anticipated timing of the benefit payments. Asset returns are based upon the anticipated average rate of earnings expected on the invested funds of the plans. At January 31, 2004, the weighted average actuarial assumptions of the Company’s plans were discount rate 6.0% and long-term rate of return on plan assets 9.0%.

Certain Operating and Expense Trends

Same store sales in the Company’s vision segment experienced strong double-digit increases during the first two months of the 2004 fiscal year compared to the same period in fiscal 2003. The performance within the segment was varied, with Cole Licensed Brands posting strong double digit results and Pearle Vision’s Company-owned stores posting low single digit increases. Things Remembered generated same store sales increases in the high single digits. There is no assurance that these same store sales trends will continue for the remainder of the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

Costs associated with the California litigation and the SEC investigation are expected to continue in 2004. However, many of the unallocated corporate expenses, such as the costs related to the management change, shareholder settlement and restatement audit fees are not expected to recur. The Company expects its profit performance to improve in fiscal 2004 as a result of revenue growth, expense controls and the non-recurrence of the aforementioned unallocated corporate expenses. As a result of the Company’s new agreement with Target Corporation, the Company closed 25 Target Optical stores on April 10, 2004 and expects to incur a charge of approximately $2.2 million related to store closing costs.

Forward Looking Statements

The Company’s expectations and beliefs concerning the future contained in this document are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those forecasted due to a variety of factors that can adversely affect the Company’s operating results, liquidity and financial condition such as risks associated with potential adverse consequences of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements, including those resulting from litigation or government investigations, restrictions or curtailment of the Company’s credit facility and other credit situations, costs and other effects associated with the California litigation, risks that the contemplated merger between the Parent and Luxottica Group S.p.A. will not be completed, uncertainty as to the timing of obtaining regulatory approvals and clearance for the Merger, the timing and achievement of improvements in the operations of the optical business, the results of Things Remembered, which is highly dependent on the fourth quarter holiday season, the nature and extent of disruptions of the economy from terrorist activities or major health concerns and from governmental and consumer responses to such situations, the actual utilization of Cole Managed Vision funded eyewear programs, the success of new store openings and the rate at which new stores achieve profitability, the Company’s ability to select, stock and price merchandise attractive to customers, success of systems development and integration, costs and other effects associated with litigation, competition in the optical industry, integration of acquired businesses, economic and weather factors affecting consumer spending, operating factors affecting customer satisfaction, including manufacturing quality of optical and engraved goods, the Company’s relationships with host stores, franchisees and managed care clients, the mix of goods sold, pricing and other competitive factors, and the seasonality of the Company’s business.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company’s major market risk is to changes in foreign currency exchange rates in Canada which could impact its results of operations and financial condition. Foreign exchange risk arises from the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates because the Company’s reporting currency is the United States dollar. Management seeks to minimize the exposure to

foreign currency fluctuations through natural internal offsets to the fullest extent possible. A 10% adverse movement in quoted foreign currency exchange rates could result in a loss of fair value of investments and notes and interest receivables of $0.1 million.

In addition, the Company is exposed to changes in the fair value of its debt portfolio, primarily resulting from the effects of changes in interest rates. The Company utilizes interest rate swaps to manage its exposure. Management believes that its use of these financial instruments is in the Company’s best interest. These agreements require the Company to pay an average floating interest rate based on six month LIBOR plus 4.5375% to a counter party while receiving a fixed rate on $50.0 million of the Company’s $125.0 million 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007. The agreements mature August 15, 2007 and qualify as fair value hedges. The LIBOR rate is reset in arrears in February and August of each year. The reset effective on February 17, 2004 for six month LIBOR was 1.175% and resulted in a rate of 5.7125% applied from August 16, 2003 through February 17, 2004. At January 31, 2004 the fair value of the swap agreements was an unrealized gain of approximately $0.8 million.

A change in six month LIBOR would effect the interest cost associated with the $50.0 million notional value of the swap agreements. A 50% change (approximately 59 basis points) in the market rates of interest for six month LIBOR as compared to the rate in effect for fiscal 2003 would increase the Company’s annual interest cost by $0.3 million. The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Information required by this ~~Item~~item appears on pages F-1 through F-2432 of this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by this reference. Other financial statements and schedules are filed herewith as “Financial Statement Schedules” pursuant to Item 1415.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements ~~with~~With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

~~PART~~Item ~~III~~ 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) Immediately following the Signature section of this Annual Report are certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Section 302 Certification”). This portion of our Annual Report on Form 10-K is our disclosure of the results of our control evaluation referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5) of the Section 302 Certification and should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certification for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as amended, of the design, operation and effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that based on such evaluation, as of January 31, 2004, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(b) Based on evaluation, there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors during the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Information required by this ~~Item~~item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information required by this ~~Item~~item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

~~Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management~~25

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

Information required by this ~~Item~~item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

10 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

~~PART~~ Information IVrequired by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

~~Item~~PART ~~14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K~~IV

(a)(1) and (2)		Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
		The financial statements and financial statement schedules filed as part of this Form 10-K for Cole National Group and its consolidated subsidiaries are located as set forth in the index on page F-1.
(a)(3)		Exhibits
		See Exhibit Index on pages X-1 through X-3.
(b)		Reports on Form 8-K
		No reports on Form 8-K have been filed by the Registrant during the quarter ended February 3, 2001.

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

~~Supplemental~~(a)(1) ~~information~~and ~~to be furnished with reports filed pursuant to Section 15~~(d2) Financial ofStatements ~~the~~and ~~Act~~Financial byStatement ~~Registrants which have not registered securities~~Schedules ~~pursuant to Section 12 of the Act.~~

No The ~~annual~~consolidated ~~report~~financial orstatements ~~proxy~~and the related financial statement ~~covering~~schedules filed as part of this Form 10-K for Cole National Group~~’s last~~, ~~fiscal~~Inc. ~~year~~and ~~has~~its ~~been~~consolidated orsubsidiaries ~~will~~are belocated ~~circulated~~as toset ~~security~~forth ~~holders~~in the index on page F-1 of this report.

11(a)(3) Exhibits

~~SIGNATURES~~ See Exhibit Index on pages X-1 through X-4.

~~Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15~~(db) Reports ofon ~~the Securities~~Form 8-K ~~Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed~~ ~~on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~

The Company filed a Form 8-K (Item 7 and 12) on December 16, 2003, which attached a press release announcing financial results for third fiscal quarter of 2003.

~~Pursuant~~ The toCompany ~~the~~filed ~~requirements~~a ofForm ~~the~~8-K ~~Securities~~(Item 5 ~~Exchange~~and ~~Act~~7) ofon ~~1934~~January 27, ~~this~~ ~~report~~2004 ~~has~~announcing that ~~been~~the ~~signed~~Parent byentered ~~the~~into ~~following~~a ~~persons~~definitive onAgreement ~~behalf~~and Plan of ~~the~~Merger with ~~Registrant~~Luxottica Group S.P.A. and inColorado ~~the~~Acquisition ~~capacities~~Corp, ~~and~~to onacquire all of the outstanding ~~dates~~shares ~~indicated~~of Cole National Corporation for a cash purchase price of $22.50 per share.

* Jeffrey A. Cole	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	May 3, 2001
* Larry Pollock	President and Chief Operating Officer and Director	May 3, 2001
* Thomas T.S. Kaung	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	May 3, 2001
/s/ William P. Lahiff, Jr. William P. Lahiff, Jr.	Senior Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)	May 3, 2001
* Timothy F. Finley	Director	May 3, 2001
* Irwin N. Gold	Director	May 3, 2001
* Peter V. Handal	Director	May 3, 2001
* Charles A. Ratner	Director	May 3, 2001
* Walter J. Salmon	Director	May 3, 2001

The Company filed a Form 8-K (Item 5 and 7) on January 30, 2004, announcing that it had extended its agreement with Target Corporation.

* TheSupplemental ~~undersigned,~~information byto ~~signing~~be ~~his~~furnished ~~name~~with ~~hereto,~~reports ~~does~~filed ~~sign and execute this report on Form 10-K~~ pursuant to ~~the~~Section 15(d) ~~Powers~~ of ~~Attorney~~the ~~executed~~Act by ~~the above-named~~Registrants ~~officers~~which ~~and~~have ~~directors~~not ofregistered ~~Cole~~securities ~~National Group, Inc. and which are~~pursuant ~~being~~to ~~filed~~Section 12 ~~herewith~~of ~~with~~ the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of such officers and directors~~Act.

/No annual report or proxy statement covering Cole National Group’s~~/William~~ P.last ~~Lahiff,~~fiscal year ~~Jr.~~has ~~William~~been P.or ~~Lahiff~~will ,be ~~Jr.,~~circulated ~~Attorney-in-Fact~~to security holders.

1226

	Page
Report of Independent Public Accountants		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2001 and 52 weeks ended January 29, 2000, and January 30, 1999		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2001, and 52 weeks ended January 29, 2000, and January 30, 1999		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity and Comprehensive Income for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2001, and 52 weeks ended January 29, 2000, and January 30, 1999		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7
Financial Statement Schedules:
Report of Independent Public Accountants on the Financial Statement Schedules		F-20
Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant		F-21
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		F-24

SIGNATURES

~~All~~ Pursuant ~~financial~~to ~~statement~~the ~~schedules~~requirements ~~not~~of ~~included~~section ~~have~~13 ~~been~~or ~~omitted~~15(d) ~~because~~of ~~they~~the ~~are not~~Securities ~~applicable~~Exchange orAct ~~because~~of 1934, the ~~required~~Registrant ~~information~~has isduly ~~otherwise~~caused ~~furnished~~this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

~~F-1~~ COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


April 12, 2004	By:	/s/ Ann M. Holt

		Ann M. Holt
		Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

TO Pursuant ~~THE~~to ~~BOARD~~the OFrequirements ~~DIRECTORS~~of OFthe ~~COLE~~Securities ~~NATIONAL~~Exchange ~~GROUP~~Act of 1934, ~~INC~~this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cole National Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and Subsidiaries as of February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholder’s equity and comprehensive income for each of the three years in the period ended February 3, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.


/s/ Larry Pollock	President and Chief Executive Officer	April 12, 2004
	and Director
Larry Pollock

/s/ Lawrence E. Hyatt	Executive Vice President and	April 12, 2004
	Chief Financial Officer
Lawrence E. Hyatt	(Principal Financial Officer)

s/ Ann M. Holt	Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller	April 12, 2004
	(Principal Accounting Officer)
Ann M. Holt

*	Chairman	April 12, 2004

Walter J. Salmon

*	Director	April 12, 2004
Jeffrey A. Cole

*	Director	April 12, 2004

Ronald E. Eilers

*	Director	April 12, 2004

Timothy F. Finley

*	Director	April 12, 2004

Irwin N. Gold

*	Director	April 12, 2004

Peter V. Handal

*	Director	April 12, 2004

Charles A. Ratner

We* ~~conducted~~The ~~our~~undersigned, ~~audits~~by insigning ~~accordance~~her ~~with~~name ~~auditing~~hereto, ~~standards~~does ~~generally accepted~~sign inand ~~the~~execute ~~United~~this ~~States.~~report ~~Those~~on ~~standards~~Form ~~require~~10-K ~~that~~pursuant weto ~~plan and perform~~ the ~~audit~~Powers toof ~~obtain~~Attorney ~~reasonable~~executed ~~assurance~~by ~~about whether~~ the ~~financial~~above-named ~~statements are~~officers ~~free~~and directors of ~~material~~Cole ~~misstatement.~~National ~~An audit includes examining~~Group, onInc. ~~a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts~~ and ~~disclosures~~which inare ~~the~~being ~~financial statements.~~filed Anherewith ~~audit~~with ~~also includes assessing~~ the ~~accounting~~Securities ~~principles used~~ and ~~significant~~ ~~estimates~~Exchange ~~made~~Commission byon ~~management,~~behalf asof ~~well~~such asofficers ~~evaluating~~and ~~the overall financial statement presentation~~directors. ~~We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.~~

In/s/ ~~our~~Ann ~~opinion,~~M. ~~the~~Holt ~~financial~~Ann ~~statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cole National Group, Inc~~M. ~~and Subsidiaries as of February 3~~Holt, ~~2001 and January 29, 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years~~ Attorney-in ~~the period ended February 3, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.~~ -Fact

~~ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP~~27

~~F-2~~INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands)


	Page
Independent Auditors’ Report		F - 2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003		F - 3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2004, February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002		F - 4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2004, February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002		F - 5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2004, February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002		F - 6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F - 7
Financial Statement Schedules:
Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant		F - 29
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		F - 32

					February 3,			January 29,
					2001			2000
Assets Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents				$	36,725		$	28,953
	Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,348 in 2000 and $7,557 in 1999					40,429			41,650
	Current portion of notes receivable					4,272			4,917
	Inventories					122,238			116,514
	Refundable income taxes					571			836
	Prepaid expenses and other					15,188			6,942
	Deferred income tax benefits					2,009			3,758
			Total current assets			221,432			203,570
Property and equipment, at cost						268,742			252,625
	Less — accumulated depreciation and amortization					(145,723	)		(140,791	)
			Total property and equipment, net			123,019			111,834
Notes receivable, excluding current portion, less reserves for uncollectible amounts of $4,537 in 2000 and $4,196 in 1999						6,573			10,550
Deferred income tax benefits and other assets						57,422			60,175
Intangible assets, net						151,588			157,399
			Total assets		$	560,034		$	543,528
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity Current liabilities:
	Current portion of long-term debt				$	49		$	585
	Accounts payable					55,644			58,514
	Payable to affiliates, net					81,789			63,589
	Accrued interest					6,337			6,090
	Accrued liabilities					75,654			70,802
	Accrued income taxes					502			178
			Total current liabilities			219,975			199,758
Long-term debt, net of discount and current portion						274,262			274,210
Other long-term liabilities						11,506			16,611
Stockholder’s equity:
		Common stock				—			—
		Paid-in capital				195,162			195,162
		Accumulated other comprehensive loss				(658	)		(117	)
		Accumulated deficit				(140,213	)		(142,096	)
				Total stockholder’s equity		54,291			52,949
				Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	560,034		$	543,528

All financial statement schedules not included have been omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is otherwise furnished.

~~The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integal part~~F-1 ~~of these consolidated balance sheets.~~

~~COLE~~INDEPENDENT ~~NATIONAL~~AUDITORS’ ~~GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~REPORT ~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS~~ ~~(Dollars in thousands)~~

			Fifty-Three			Fifty-Two			Fifty-Two
			Weeks Ended			Weeks Ended			Weeks Ended
			February 3,			January 29,			January 30,
			2001			2000			1999
Net revenue			$	1,076,420		$	1,037,581		$	1,045,494
Costs and expenses:
	Cost of goods sold			355,583			362,661			367,498
	Operating expenses			649,392			601,875			584,954
	Depreciation and amortization			37,351			38,485			32,803
	Restructuring and other unusual charges			—			—			7,873
		Total costs and expenses		1,042,326			1,003,021			993,128
Operating income				34,094			34,560			52,366
Interest and other (income) expense:
	Interest expense			28,402			27,405			27,354
	Interest and other income			(541	)		(722	)		(6,283	)
		Total interest and other (income) expense, net		27,861			26,683			21,071
Income before income taxes				6,233			7,877			31,295
Income tax provision				4,350			3,737			11,960
Net income			$	1,883		$	4,140		$	19,335

To the Board of Directors of Cole National Group, Inc.:

~~The~~ We have audited the accompanying ~~notes~~consolidated tobalance sheets of Cole National Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder’s equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended January 31, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in Item 15(a)(2) . These financial statements and financial statement schedules are anthe ~~integral~~responsibility ~~part~~ of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these ~~consolidated~~financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

~~F-4~~ We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~COLE~~ In ~~NATIONAL~~our ~~GROUP~~opinion, ~~INC~~such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cole National Group, Inc. ~~AND~~and subsidiaries ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, and the results of ~~CONSOLIDATED~~their ~~STATEMENTS~~operations OFand ~~CASH~~their ~~FLOWS~~cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the ~~(Dollars~~period ended January 31, 2004, in ~~thousands)~~conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

				Fifty-Three			Fifty-Two			Fifty-Two
				Weeks Ended			Weeks Ended			Weeks Ended
				February 3,			January 29,			January 30,
				2001			2000			1999
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net income			$	1,883		$	4,140		$	19,335
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization			37,351			38,485			32,803
		Non-cash interest, net			1,150			1,050			1,054
		Deferred income tax provision			2,528			3,239			16,221
		Restructuring and unusual charges			—			—			4,778
		Increases (decreases) in cash resulting from changes in assets and liabilities:
			Accounts and notes receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets		(2,860	)		4,871			11,809
			Inventories		(5,724	)		3,367			(4,404	)
			Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities		(1,335	)		(32,481	)		(21,656	)
			Accrued interest		247			(126	)		(399	)
			Accrued, refundable and deferred income taxes		433			1,559			895
			Net cash provided by operating activities		33,673			24,104			60,436
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Purchases of property and equipment, net				(35,030	)		(25,877	)		(27,914	)
	Proceeds from sale/leaseback, net				—			—			8,835
	Systems development costs				(8,444	)		(13,639	)		(16,802	)
	Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired				—			—			(7,231	)
	Other, net				127			(2,618	)		312
			Net cash used for investing activities		(43,347	)		(42,134	)		(42,800	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Repayment of long-term debt				(576	)		(409	)		(15,095	)
	Advances from (to) affiliates, net				18,971			(3,848	)		(19,246	)
	Payment of deferred financing fees				(422	)		(281	)		—
	Other, net				(527	)		464			(227	)
			Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		17,446			(4,074	)		(34,568	)
Cash and temporary cash investments:
	Net increase (decrease) during the period				7,772			(22,104	)		(16,932	)
	Balance, beginning of the period				28,953			51,057			67,989
	Balance, end of the period			$	36,725		$	28,953		$	51,057

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its presentation and classification of the (gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt, effective February 2, 2003.

~~The~~ As ~~accompanying~~discussed ~~notes~~in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the ~~are~~Company anchanged ~~integral~~its ~~part~~ method of ~~these~~accounting ~~consolidated~~for ~~statements~~goodwill and other intangible assets, effective February 3, 2002.

~~F-5~~/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

~~COLE NATIONAL GROUP~~Cleveland, ~~INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~Ohio ~~CONSOLIDATED~~April 12, ~~STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY~~2004 ~~AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME~~ ~~(Dollars in thousands )~~

		February 3,			January 29,			January 30,
		2001			2000			1999
Common Stock:
	Balance at beginning of period	$	—		$	—		$	—
	Balance at end of period		—			—			—
Paid In Capital:
	Balance at beginning of period		195,162			195,139			193,560
	Tax benefit of stock option exercises		—			23			1,579
	Balance at end of period		195,162			195,162			195,139
Accumulated Deficit:
	Balance at beginning of period		(142,096	)		(146,236	)		(165,571	)
	Net income		1,883			4,140			19,335
	Balance at end of period		(140,213	)		(142,096	)		(146,236	)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:
	Balance at beginning of period		(117	)		(657	)		(436	)
	Other comprehensive income (loss)		(541	)		540			(221	)
	Balance at end of period		(658	)		(117	)		(657	)
Total Stockholder’s Equity		$	54,291		$	52,949		$	48,246
Comprehensive Income:
	Net income	$	1,883		$	4,140		$	19,335
	Cumulative translation adjustment		(541	)		540			(221	)
	Total comprehensive income	$	1,342		$	4,680		$	19,114

F-2

~~F-6~~COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Dollars in thousands)

COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


	January 31,			February 1,
	2004			2003
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	59,184		$	42,001
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $3,449 in 2003 and $3,063 in 2002		55,238			50,954
Current portion of notes receivable		2,501			4,517
Inventories		120,927			120,642
Prepaid expenses and other		25,610			24,210
Deferred income taxes		31,612			32,116

Total current assets		295,072			274,440

Property and equipment, at cost		311,890			312,413
Less — accumulated depreciation and amortization		(194,886	)		(192,805	)

Total property and equipment, net		117,004			119,608

Notes receivable, excluding current portion, less allowances of $2,858 in 2003 and $3,049 in 2002		4,928			2,180
Deferred income taxes		31,375			26,026
Other assets		36,959			45,449
Other intangibles, net		49,773			50,903
Goodwill, net		85,734			85,557

Total assets	$	620,845		$	604,163

Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	608		$	232
Accounts payable		61,180			67,581
Payable to affiliates, net		97,512			75,764
Accrued interest		7,715			7,805
Accrued liabilities		95,041			92,289
Accrued income taxes		2,789			3,309
Deferred revenue		41,122			38,014

Total current liabilities		305,967			284,994

Long-term debt, net of discount and current portion		279,229			276,553
Other long-term liabilities		32,726			36,498
Deferred revenue, long-term		12,129			11,559
Stockholder’s equity:
Common stock		—			—
Paid in-capital		200,299			195,326
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(15,303	)		(14,393	)
Accumulated deficit		(194,202	)		(186,374	)

Total stockholder’s equity (deficit)		(9,206	)		(5,441	)

Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	620,845		$	604,163

(1)		Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
		Basis of Presentation -
		Cole National Group, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cole National Corporation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cole National Group and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
		Fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to January 31 and are identified according to the calendar year in which they begin. For example, the fiscal year ended February 3, 2001 is referred to as “fiscal 2000.” Fiscal 2000, consisted of a 53-week period, fiscal 1999 and fiscal 1998 each consisted of 52-week periods.
		Nature of Operations –
		The Company is a specialty service retailer operating in both host and non-host environments, whose primary lines of business are eyewear products and services and personalized gifts. The Company sells its products through 2,387 company-owned retail locations and 426 franchised locations in 50 states, Canada, and the Caribbean, and differentiates itself from other specialty retailers by providing value-added services at the point of sale at all of its retail locations. The Company has two reportable segments: Cole Vision and Things Remembered (see Note 9).
		Inventories -
		Inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market.
		Property and Depreciation -
		The policy is to provide depreciation using the straight-line method over a period which is sufficient to amortize the cost of the asset over its useful life or lease term.
		The estimated useful lives for depreciation purposes are:

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

~~Buildings and improvements Equipment Furniture and fixtures Leasehold improvements 5 to 40 years~~ F-3 ~~to 10 years 2 to 10 years 2 to 20 years~~

		2000		1999
Land and buildings		$	12,987	$	13,691
Furniture, fixtures and equipment			162,367		153,294
Leasehold improvements			93,388		85,640
	Total property and equipment	$	268,742	$	252,625

COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands)

Store Opening Expenses - Store opening expenses are charged to operations in the period the expenses are incurred.


	Fifty-Two Weeks Ended
	January 31,			February 1,			February 2,
	2004			2003			2002
Net revenues	$	1,201,773		$	1,148,119		$	1,109,123
Cost and expenses:
Cost of revenues		448,813			412,253			395,407
Operating expenses		740,950			707,596			679,040
Goodwill and tradename amortization		—			—			5,010

Total costs and expenses		1,189,763			1,119,849			1,079,457

Operating income		12,010			28,270			29,666
Interest and other (income) expense:
Interest expense		24,989			26,320			27,829
Interest and other (income), net		(1,498	)		(1,059	)		(2,962	)
(Gains) loss on early extinguishment of debt		(15	)		11,141			—

Total interest and other (income) expense, net		23,476			36,402			24,867

Income (loss) before income taxes		(11,466	)		(8,132	)		4,799
Income tax provision (benefit)		(3,638	)		(795	)		5,309

Net income (loss)	$	(7,828	)	$	(7,337	)	$	(510	)

~~F-7~~The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

~~Notes Receivable~~ F-4

~~Intangible~~COLE ~~Assets~~NATIONAL -GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Dollars in thousands)

Intangible assets, net, consist of the following at February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000 (000’s omitted):


	Fifty-Two Weeks Ended
	January 31,			February 1,			February 2,
	2004			2003			2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(7,828	)	$	(7,337	)	$	(510	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		39,787			35,630			38,905
Gain on sale of assets		(1,019	)		—			(840	)
Impairment losses		4,406			899			3,738
Noncash compensation		3,690			(399	)		218
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)		(3,450	)		(2,488	)		2,929
(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt		(15	)		11,141			—
Noncash interest and other, net		(366	)		1,165			1,253
Increases (decreases) in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets		(3,645	)		(11,453	)		(1,385	)
Inventories		(49	)		958			9,566
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities		4,071			9,067			(2,226	)
Accrued interest		(90	)		1,465			(70	)
Accrued and refundable income taxes		(407	)		685			276

Net cash provided by operating activities		35,085			39,333			51,854

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(26,828	)		(39,360	)		(33,628	)
Net proceeds from sales and sale/leasebacks of fixed assets		2,605			—			12,481
Systems development costs		(5,261	)		(5,626	)		(6,912	)
Contingent payments for and acquisition of businesses		(4,051	)		(1,645	)		(847	)
Other, net		11			9			—

Net cash used for investing activities		(33,524	)		(46,622	)		(28,906	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term debt		(444	)		(158,288	)		(135	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			150,000			—
Payment of deferred financing fees		(238	)		(6,058	)		—
Advances from (to) affiliates, net		21,379			(6,395	)		(4,329	)
Increase (decrease) in overdraft balances		(6,670	)		6,210			7,872
Other, net		1,595			522			(275	)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		15,622			(14,009	)		3,133

Cash and cash equivalents:
Net increase (decrease) during the period		17,183			(21,298	)		26,081
Balance, beginning of period		42,001			63,299			37,218

Balance, end of period	$	59,184		$	42,001		$	63,299

Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid	$	23,887		$	23,690		$	26,646

Income taxes paid	$	1,094		$	1,268		$	1,049

	2000		1999
Goodwill	$	107,360	$	111,910
Tradenames		44,228		45,489
	$	151,588	$	157,399

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

~~Goodwill is being amortized on a straight~~F-~~line basis over periods from~~ 5 ~~to 40 years, based on management’s assessment of the estimated~~ useful life, and is presented net of accumulated amortization of $46,194,000 and $41,615,000 at February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000, respectively. Amortization of goodwill in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $4,580,000, $4,043,000 and $3,883,000, respectively. Management regularly evaluates its accounting for goodwill considering primarily such factors as historical profitability, current operating profits and cash flows. The Company believes that, at February 3, 2001, the assets are realizable and the amortization periods are still appropriate.

~~Other~~COLE ~~Long-Term~~NATIONAL ~~Assets~~GROUP, -INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Dollars in thousands)

Financing costs incurred in connection with obtaining long-term debt are capitalized in other assets and amortized over the life of the related debt using the effective interest method. At February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000, deferred financing costs net of accumulated amortization were $6,082,000 and $6,714,000, respectively. Amortization of financing costs in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $1,054,000, $965,000 and $977,000, respectively.


	January 31,			February 1,			February 2,
	2004			2003			2002
Common Stock:
Balance at beginning of period	$	—		$	—		$	—
Issuance of stock		—			—			—

Balance at end of period		—			—			—

Paid-in Capital:
Balance at beginning of period		195,326			194,886			195,066
Capital contribution		3,564			—			—
Shares of parent held in deferred compensation plan		162			(58	)		(34	)
Tax benefits of exercised stock options		1,247			498			(146	)

Balance at end of period		200,299			195,326			194,886

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax:
Balance at beginning of period		(14,393	)		(1,105	)		(664	)
Minimum pension liability, net of tax of $1,253 and $6,987 and $0, respectively		(1,638	)		(13,665	)		—
Foreign currency translation adjustment		728			377			(441	)

Other comprehensive loss		(910	)		(13,288	)		(441	)

Balance at end of period		(15,303	)		(14,393	)		(1,105	)

Accumulated Deficit:
Balance at beginning of period		(186,374	)		(179,037	)		(178,527	)
Net income (loss)		(7,828	)		(7,337	)		(510	)

Balance at end of period		(194,202	)		(186,374	)		(179,037	)

Total Stockholder’s Equity	$	(9,206	)	$	(5,441	)	$	14,744

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net income (loss)	$	(7,828	)	$	(7,337	)	$	(510	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) per above		(910	)		(13,288	)		(441	)

Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	(8,738	)	$	(20,625	)	$	(951	)

~~Direct~~The ~~costs~~accompanying notes to ~~develop~~consolidated orfinancial ~~obtain~~statements ~~internal use software, including internal costs,~~ are ~~capitalized~~an inintegral ~~other~~part ~~assets and amortized over the estimated useful life~~ of ~~the software using a straight-line method. Amortization periods range from two to seven years, and begin when the software is placed in service. At February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000,~~ these ~~costs,~~consolidated ~~net~~financial ~~of accumulated amortization, were $36,370,000 and $38,127,000, respectively~~statements. ~~Amortization of systems development costs in~~ ~~fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $7,695,000, $6,703,000 and $2,980,000,~~ ~~respectively.~~

~~Valuation of Long~~F-~~Lived Assets -~~6

~~Other~~Cole ~~Long-Term~~National ~~Liabilities~~Group, -Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Other~~(1) ~~long-term~~Summary ~~liabilities consist primarily~~ of ~~certain~~Significant ~~employee benefit~~Accounting ~~obligations,~~Policies ~~deferred~~Basis lease credits and other lease-related obligations, deferred revenue and other obligations not expected to be paid within 12 months. Deferred lease credits are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of ~~the applicable lease.~~ Presentation

~~F-8~~ Cole National Group, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cole National Corporation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cole National Group and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

~~Capital~~ Fiscal ~~Stock~~years end on the Saturday closest to January 31 and are identified according to the calendar year in which they begin. For example, the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 is referred to as “fiscal 2003.” Fiscal 2003, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001 each consisted of 52-week periods.

AtNature ~~February 3, 2001 and January 29, 2000, there were 1,100 shares~~ of ~~common~~ ~~stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized, issued and outstanding.~~ Operations

~~Foreign~~ The ~~Currency~~Company ~~Translation~~is a specialty service retailer operating in both host and nonhost environments, whose primary lines of business are optical products and services and personalized gifts. The Company sells its products through 2,444 company-owned retail locations and 481 franchised locations in 50 states, Canada, and the Caribbean. In connection with its optical business, the Company is a managed vision care benefits provider and claims payment administrator whose programs provide comprehensive eyecare benefits primarily marketed directly to large employers, health maintenance organizations (HMO) and other organizations. The Company has two reportable segments: Cole Vision and Things Remembered (see Note 7).

~~The~~Use ~~assets and liabilities~~ of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated to United States dollars at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at average monthly rates of exchange. Translation adjustments are presented as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within stockholder’s equity. Estimates

~~Revenues~~ The -preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~Revenues~~ Significant ~~include~~estimates ~~sales~~are ofrequired ~~goods~~in ~~and~~determining ~~services~~the toallowance ~~retail customers at~~for ~~company-operated~~uncollectible ~~stores~~accounts, ~~sales of merchandise~~ inventory tovaluation, ~~franchisees~~depreciation, amortization and ~~other~~recoverability ~~outside~~of ~~customers~~long-lived assets, ~~other~~deferred ~~revenues~~income ~~from~~taxes, ~~franchisees~~remakes ~~such as royalties~~and ~~based~~returns ~~on sales~~allowances, ~~interest~~managed ~~income~~vision onunderwriting ~~notes~~results, ~~receivable and initial franchise~~self-insurance ~~fees~~reserves, and ~~capitation~~retirement and ~~other~~post-employment ~~fees associated with Cole Vision’s managed vision care business~~benefits.

Franchise revenues based on sales by franchisees are accrued as earned. Initial franchise fees are recorded as income when all material services or conditions relating to the sale of the franchises have been substantially performed or satisfied by the Company and when the related store begins operations. Reclassifications

~~Advertising~~ Certain -reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements and the notes to conform to the current year presentation.

~~Advertising~~ Managed ~~production~~care ~~costs~~claims expense, certain store lab leased equipment, and workers’ ~~other~~compensation ~~advertising~~and ~~costs~~property ~~are~~insurance ~~expensed~~expense related to the company’s asmanufacturing ~~incurred,~~activities ahave ~~portion~~been reclassified to cost of ~~which~~revenues ~~are~~from operating ~~reimbursed~~expenses byto ~~franchisees~~more ~~based~~appropriately onreflect ~~a percentage~~the nature of ~~their~~the ~~sales.~~costs ~~Advertising~~and to ~~expense~~provide isan ~~summarized~~improved asmeasure ~~follows (000’s~~of ~~omitted):~~gross margin.

	2000			1999			1998
Gross advertising expense	$	89,329		$	88,525		$	82,492
Less: Franchisee contribution		(20,562	)		(19,930	)		(20,244	)
Net advertising expense	$	68,767		$	68,595		$	62,248

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue

~~Earnings~~ Revenues ~~Per~~include ~~Share~~sales of goods and services, including delivery fees to retail customers at company-operated stores, sales of merchandise inventory to franchisees and other outside customers, other revenues from franchisees such as royalties based on sales and initial franchise fees, and capitation and other fees associated with Cole Vision’s managed vision care business.

~~Earnings~~ Revenues ~~per~~from ~~share~~merchandise sales and ~~weighted~~services, ~~average~~net ~~number~~of estimated returns and allowances, are recognized at the time of ~~common~~customer ~~shares~~receipt or when the ~~outstanding~~related ~~data~~goods ~~for~~are ~~2000,~~shipped ~~1999~~direct to the customer and ~~1998~~all significant obligations of the Company have been ~~omitted~~satisfied. asThe ~~the~~reserve for returns and ~~presentation~~allowances is calculated as a percentage of ~~such~~revenues ~~information,~~based ~~considering~~on historical return percentages. Capitation revenues are accrued when due under related contracts at the ~~Company~~agreed upon per member, per month rates. Administrative service revenue is arecognized ~~wholly~~when services are provided over the contract ~~owned~~period ~~subsidiary~~and ofthe ~~Cole~~Company’s ~~National~~customers ~~Corporation~~are obligated to pay. Additionally, isthe Company ~~not~~sells ~~meaningful~~discount programs which have twelve-month terms. Revenues from discount programs are deferred and amortized over the 12-month term.

~~Cash Flows~~ F-7

~~Net~~ The ~~cash~~Company ~~flows~~also ~~from~~sells ~~operating~~separately ~~activities~~priced ~~reflect~~extended ~~cash~~warranty ~~payments~~contracts with ~~for~~terms of coverage of 12 and 24 months. Revenues from the sale of these ~~income~~contracts ~~taxes~~are deferred and ~~interest~~amortized over the lives of the contracts, while the costs to service the warranty claims are expensed as ~~follows~~incurred. Incremental ~~(000’s~~costs ~~omitted):~~directly related to the sale of such contracts, such as sales commissions and percentage rent, are deferred in prepaid expenses and charged to expense in proportion to the revenue recognized.

	2000		1999		1998
Income taxes	$	844	$	623	$	1,644
Interest		27,007		26,229		25,900

A reconciliation of the changes in deferred revenue from the sale of warranty contracts and other deferred items follows (dollars in thousands):

No dividends were declared during fiscal 2000, 1999 or 1998.


	2003			2002
Deferred revenues:
Beginning balance	$	49,573		$	46,511
Warranty contracts sold		56,479			53,023
Other deferred revenue		3,264			1,080
Amortization of deferred revenue		(56,065	)		(51,041	)

Ending balance	$	53,251		$	49,573

~~F-9~~ Franchise revenues based on sales by franchisees are accrued as earned. Initial franchise fees are recorded as revenue when all material services or conditions relating to the sale of the franchises have been substantially performed or satisfied by the Company and when the related store begins operations.

		Use of Estimates -
		The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
		Reclassifications -
		Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
(2)		Acquisitions and Dispositions of Businesses
		The Company made the following acquisitions, each of which has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, including any contingent payments that may be made in the future. Pro forma financial results have not been presented for these acquisitions, as they did not have a material effect on results of operations.
		In October 1999, the Company acquired MetLife’s managed vision care benefits business. The business consists of vision care contracts with approximately 250 institutional customers and generates approximately $15.0 million of revenue annually. The purchase price paid to date totals $2.6 million, with additional amounts contingently due upon certain conditions being met over the four years following the date of purchase.
		In fiscal 1998, the Company acquired ten Buckeye Optical stores in Columbus, Ohio, and all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Management Associates, Inc., whose operations consisted of four 20/20 Eyecare stores located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The total purchase price for these acquisitions was $7.2 million.
		In fiscal 1999, the Company announced its plan to close the 150 optical departments in Montgomery Ward stores. The closings, which were completed by the end of fiscal 1999, resulted in a pretax loss of $2.0 million, consisting primarily of inventory and fixed asset write-offs. The after tax cash cost of the closings was not significant. Annual revenues in fiscal 1999 for the Ward’s Optical Departments were $21.2 million.
(3)		Restructuring and Other Unusual Items
		In fiscal 1998, the Company began implementation of a restructuring plan and recorded a net pretax charge of $13.1 million, related to restructuring its Pearle business along with other unusual charges. The net pretax charge consisted of charges associated with the restructuring of $13.9 million, a reversal of previously established restructuring accruals of $12.3 million and other unusual charges totaling $11.5 million. The restructuring charge of $13.9 million related to changes made to the Pearle operating model and structure of the home office organization.
		The costs of the 1998 restructuring approximated the original estimates. A remaining balance of approximately $0.1 million for the facilities relocations was reversed into income in fiscal 1999. As of February 3, 2001, and January 29, 2000, there were no balances remaining for restructure reserves.
		The unusual charges in fiscal 1998 related to the write off of $8.8 million associated with the abandonment of previously capitalized system development costs (including $1.9 million of incurred costs that were paid in the first half of fiscal 1999) and $2.7 million primarily related to restricted stock issued to two senior executive officers. See Note 6 for further discussion of the restricted stock grants.
		The 1998 results include the recognition of $6.0 million of income from cash received in a nontaxable settlement of certain contingencies related to several claims against and indemnifications from the former owner of Pearle, which was acquired by the Company in fiscal 1996. In connection with this settlement, the Company assumed secondary liability for loans to certain franchisees held by a third party which totaled $3.6 million at February 3, 2001. The Company is contingently liable should any of these franchisees default, and also for prepayment penalties of up to $0.5 million at February 3, 2001. The Company has established reserves for potential losses on the loans, which mature through 2001. The settlement also included a release of the former owner of Pearle from certain future non-tax claims related to Pearle.

Things Remembered sells memberships in its Rewards Club™ program, which allows members to earn rebates based on their accumulated purchases. The Company defers and amortizes the membership fee revenue over the life of the membership. The rebates, which can only be used to offset the price of future customer purchases, are recognized as a reduction of revenue based on the rebates earned and the estimated future redemptions. The cumulative liability for unredeemed rebates is adjusted over time based on actual experience and trends with respect to redemption.

~~F-10~~ Consideration Received from Vendors

~~(4)~~ The ~~Long-Term~~Company ~~Debt~~receives ~~Long-term~~consideration ~~debt~~from atvendors ~~February~~as 3,either ~~2001~~rebates ~~and~~on ~~January~~the purchase ~~29,~~of ~~2000~~the isinventory ~~summarized~~or as ~~follows~~reimbursement ~~(000~~of costs incurred to sell the vendors’s ~~omitted):~~products. Rebates received for purchases are deferred and recorded as a reduction of cost of revenues when the product is sold or based upon estimated inventory turns.

			2000			1999
9-7/8% Senior subordinated Notes:
	Face Value		$	150,000		$	150,000
	Unamortized discount			(785	)		(880	)
		Total 9-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes		149,215			149,120
8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes				125,000			125,000
Capital lease obligations (See Note 10)				96			675
				274,311			274,795
Less current portion				(49	)		(585	)
Net long-term debt			$	274,262		$	274,210

Reimbursement for specific, incremental and identifiable advertising costs incurred by the Company to sell the vendors’ products are recorded as a reduction of those costs at the time the expense is recognized in the statement of operations. Co-op funds calculated as a percentage of inventory purchases are offset against the related expense at the time the inventory is sold.

		On August 22, 1997, the Company issued $125.0 million of 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes that mature in 2007 with no earlier scheduled redemption or sinking fund payments. Interest on the 8-5/8% Notes is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15.
		On November 15, 1996, the Company issued $150 million of 9-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes that mature in 2006 with no earlier scheduled redemption or sinking fund payments. Interest on the 9-7/8% Notes is payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 31.
		The 8-5/8% Notes and the 9-7/8% Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company, subordinated in right of payment to senior indebtedness of the Company and senior in right of payment to any current or future subordinated indebtedness of the Company.
		The indentures pursuant to which the 8-5/8% Notes and the 9-7/8% Notes were issued restrict dividend payments to Cole National Corporation to 50% of the Company’s net income after October 31, 1993, plus amounts due to Cole National Corporation under a tax sharing agreement and for administrative expenses of Cole National Corporation not to exceed 0.25% of the Company’s net revenue. The indentures also contain certain optional and mandatory redemption features and other financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at February 3, 2001.
		At February 3, 2001 the fair value of long-term debt was approximately $212.3 million compared to a carrying value of $274.3 million. The fair value was estimated primarily by using quoted market prices. There are significant principal payment obligations under its outstanding indebtedness until the 9-7/8% notes mature in 2006.
(5)		Credit Facility
		The operating subsidiaries of the Company have a working capital commitment ranging from $50.0 million to $75.0 million based on the Company’s current debt leverage ratio described in the credit facility. This credit facility extends until January 31, 2003. Borrowings under the credit facility presently bear interest based on leverage ratios at a rate equal to, at the option of the principal operating subsidiaries of the Company, either (a) the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.5% or (b) 1.5% plus the highest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the three-week moving average of the secondary market rates for three-month certificates of deposit plus 1% and (iii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The Company pays a commitment fee of between .375% and .75% per annum on the total unused portion of the facility based on the percentage of revolving credit commitments used. Cole National Corporation, the Company’s parent, guarantees this credit facility.
		The credit facility requires the principal operating subsidiaries of the Company to comply with various operating covenants that restrict corporate activities, including covenants restricting the ability of the subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated indebtedness, dispose of certain investments or make acquisitions. The credit facility also requires the subsidiaries to comply with certain financial covenants, including covenants regarding minimum interest coverage, maximum leverage and consolidated net worth. The principal operating subsidiaries of the Company were in compliance with these covenants at February 3, 2001.
		The credit facility restricts dividend payments to the Company to amounts needed to pay interest on the 9-7/8% Notes and the 8-5/8% Notes, and certain amounts related to taxes, along with up to $8.0 million plus 0.25% of the Company’s consolidated net revenue annually for other direct expenses of Cole National Corporation or the Company.

Managed Vision Underwriting Results

~~F-11~~ The Company sells capitated managed vision care plans which generally have a duration of one year. Based upon its experience, the Company believes that it can predict utilization and claims experience, including estimates for claims incurred but not reported, under these plans with a high level of confidence. Underwriting results are recognized using an estimated percentage of claims revenue. A portion of the resulting gain is reserved for potential variances between predicted and actual results. The reserves are reconciled following the end of each plan year.

		No borrowings under the credit facility were outstanding as of February 3, 2001, and the maximum amount of borrowings outstanding during fiscal 2000 was $20.2 million. No borrowings under the credit facility were outstanding as of January 29, 2000, or at anytime during fiscal 1999.
(6)		Stock Compensation and Warrants
		Cole National Corporation has various stock-based compensation plans in which key employees of the Company are eligible to participate.
		The Company applies APB Opinion 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for Cole National Corporation’s stock-based compensation plans. Compensation cost of $2.3 million, has been charged against income for Cole National Corporation’s stock-based plans in fiscal 1998. Had compensation cost for Cole National Corporation’s stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the dates of awards consistent with the method of SFAS No.123, the Company’s net income would have been $489,000, $2,583,000 and $18,647,000 in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
		For SFAS No. 123 purposes, the fair value of each option granted by Cole National Corporation was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rates of 6.2%, 5.9 % and 4.7% for grants in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively, volatility of 45-47%, 39-45% and 35-39% in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively, and expected lives of six years for options granted in all fiscal years. The fair value of each share granted under Cole National corporation’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan was similarly estimated using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 6.0% and 5.2% in fiscal 2000 and 1999, respectively, volatility of 46-47% and 42% in fiscal 2000 and 1999, respectively and expected lives of 5 to 6 months. The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in the pro forma disclosure above are not indicative of future amounts. SFAS No. 123 does not apply to options granted prior to January 29, 1995 and additional awards in future years are anticipated.
(7)		Income Taxes
		The Company is included in the consolidated federal income tax returns of Cole National Corporation and has been charged (credited) an amount equal to the taxes that would have been payable by it if it were a corporation filing a separate return.
		The income tax provision for continuing operations reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 are detailed below (000’s omitted):

Other Managed Vision Expenses

		2000		1999			1998
Current payable (refundable)-
	Federal	$	860	$	—		$	(6,528	)
	State and local		972		824			1,486
	Foreign		89		339			781
			1,921		1,163			(4,261	)
Deferred -
	Federal		2,002		8,199			16,765
	Foreign		427		(179	)		(544	)
	Tax benefit of net operating loss carryforward		—		(5,446	)		—
			2,429		2,574			16,221
	Income tax provision	$	4,350	$	3,737		$	11,960

Cost of printing member cards, program descriptions and related distribution costs for capitation and administrative service contracts are expensed when incurred. Expenses for discount programs are recognized over the 12-month contract period.

~~F-12~~ Advertising and Direct Response Marketing

~~The~~ Cost ~~income~~for ~~tax~~newspaper, ~~provision~~television, ~~for~~radio ~~continuing~~and ~~operations~~other ~~differs~~media ~~from~~advertising are expensed when incurred and production costs are expensed the first time ~~federal~~the ~~statutory~~advertising ~~rate~~occurs asor ~~follows~~when ~~(000’s~~the ~~omitted):~~service is performed, if later. Costs for certain direct response advertising are capitalized if such direct response advertising costs result in future economic benefit. Such costs related to direct

				2000		1999			1998
Tax provision at statutory rate				$	2,182	$	2,757		$	10,954
	Tax effect of-
		Amortization of goodwill			1,252		1,230			1,234
		State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit			632		536			966
		Nontaxable settlement			—		—			(2,100	)
		Nonrecurring charges			—		—			537
		Decrease in valuation allowance			—		(669	)		—
		Other, net			284		(117	)		369
			Income tax provision	$	4,350	$	3,737		$	11,960

F-8

			2000			1999
Deferred tax assets:
	Employee benefit accruals		$	1,738		$	2,821
	Other non-deductible accruals			7,541			9,040
	State and local taxes			818			1,192
	Net operating loss carryforwards			3,025			3,576
	Intangibles			4,446			4,471
	Inventory reserves			3,665			3,518
	Bad debt reserves			316			185
	Other			2,297			2,427
	Total deferred tax assets			23,846			27,230
	Valuation allowance			(1,141	)		(1,141	)
		Net deferred tax assets		22,705			26,089
Deferred tax liabilities:
	Depreciation and amortization			(4,750	)		(5,582	)
	Other			(2,856	)		(2,905	)
		Total deferred tax liabilities		(7,606	)		(8,487	)
		Net deferred taxes	$	15,099		$	17,602

response advertising are amortized in proportion to when the revenues are recognized, not to exceed 90 days. Generally, other direct response program costs that do not meet the capitalization criteria are expensed the first time advertising occurs.

At The ~~February 3,~~total ~~2001,~~cost ~~Cole National Group, Inc. and subsidiaries have approximately $18.9 million~~ of ~~tax~~advertising ~~net~~charged operating loss carryforwards in the United States that expire in the years 2005 through 2019. Of that amount, $8.3 million resulted from the Company’s acquisition of American Vision Centers (“AVC”). Due to ~~the change in ownership requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, utilization of AVC’s net~~ operating ~~loss~~expense is ~~limited to~~net ~~$0.3 million per year. A valuation allowance~~ of ~~$1.1 million has been~~ ~~established~~amounts toreimbursed ~~reduce~~by ~~the~~franchisees ~~deferred~~based ~~tax~~on ~~asset~~a ~~related~~percentage toof ~~the~~their ~~net operating loss to the amount that will likely be realized~~sales. ~~The Company’s balance~~ ~~sheet~~Advertising ~~reflects~~expense anis ~~amount~~summarized ~~from the Parent for the benefit the Parent will receive on the U.S. consolidated federal income tax return~~ as afollows ~~result~~(dollars ~~of the~~in ~~net operating losses generated by the Company.~~thousands):

F-13


	2003			2002			2001
Gross advertising expense	$	87,572		$	85,215		$	84,191
Less: Franchise contribution		(23,828	)		(21,303	)		(20,486	)

Net advertising expense	$	63,744		$	63,912		$	63,705

		No provision of United States federal and state income taxes has been provided for the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries as those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to both United States income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable.
(8)		Retirement Plans
		The Company maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers employees who have met eligibility service requirements and are not members of certain collective bargaining units. The pension plan calls for benefits to be paid to eligible employees at retirement based primarily upon years of service and their compensation levels near retirement.
		The Company’s policy is to fund amounts necessary to keep the pension plan in full force and effect, in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Actuarial present values of benefit obligations are determined using the projected unit credit method.
		Pension expense for fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 includes the following components (000’s omitted):

Gains (Losses) from the Sale and Franchising of Company Operated Stores

			2000			1999			1998
Service cost — benefits earned during the period			$	1,398		$	1,636		$	1,446
Interest cost on the projected benefit obligation				1,882			1,733			1,582
Less:
	Return on plan assets -
		Actual		(359	)		(2,205	)		(2,494	)
		Deferred		(2,058	)		19			690
				(2,417	)		(2,186	)		(1,804	)
Amortization of transition asset over 17.9 years				(179	)		(179	)		(179	)
		Net pension expense	$	684		$	1,004		$	1,045

Gains (losses) from the sale and franchising of company operated stores include the gains or losses from the sale of existing Pearle operated stores to new and existing franchisees, reduced by transaction costs and direct administrative costs of franchising. The Company recognizes these gains (losses) when the sale transaction closes, the franchisee has a minimum amount of the purchase at-risk and the Company is satisfied that the franchisee can meet its financial obligations. If the criteria for gain recognition are not met, the gain is deferred to the extent a remaining financial obligation in connection with the sales transaction exists. Deferred gains are recognized when these criteria are met or as the Company’s financial obligation is reduced. Gains (losses) are recorded as decreases (increases) to operating expenses and were $2,487,000, $711,000 and $44,000 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

~~F-14~~ Store Opening Expenses

~~The~~ Store ~~following~~opening ~~sets~~expenses ~~forth~~are ~~changes~~charged into ~~the~~operations ~~benefit~~in ~~obligation and~~ the ~~plan~~period ~~assets during~~ the expenses ~~year~~are ~~and reconciles the funded status of the pension plan with the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets (000’s omitted):~~incurred.

			2000			1999
Change in benefit obligation:
	Benefit obligation at beginning of period		$	22,660		$	24,599
	Service cost			1,398			1,636
	Interest cost			1,882			1,733
	Actuarial loss (gain)			633			(4,017	)
	Benefits paid			(1,011	)		(956	)
	Expenses paid			(362	)		(335	)
		Benefit obligation at end of period	$	25,200		$	22,660
Change in plan assets:
	Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		$	25,410		$	23,216
	Actual return of plan assets			359			2,205
	Employer contributions			1,681			1,280
	Benefits paid			(1,011	)		(956	)
	Expenses paid			(362	)		(335	)
		Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	26,077		$	25,410
Reconciliation of funded status:
	Benefit obligation at end of period		$	25,200		$	22,660
	Fair value of plan assets, primarily money market and equity mutual funds			26,077			25,410
	Funded status			877			2,750
	Unrecognized prior service cost			25			54
	Net unrecognized loss (gain)			762			(1,957	)
	Unamortized transition (asset) obligation			(698	)		(878	)
		Pension asset (liability) included in accrued liabilities	$	966		$	(31	)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

~~For~~ Cash ~~both~~and ~~years,~~cash ~~the~~equivalents ~~weighted~~consist ~~average~~of ~~discount~~cash ~~rate~~in ~~used to measure the projected benefit obligation was 8.4%~~banks, ~~the~~investments ~~rate of increase~~ in ~~future~~money market ~~compensation levels was 5.0% and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 9.5%. The Company has a defined contribution plan~~accounts, ~~including~~treasury ~~features under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code~~bills, ~~which~~commercial provides retirement benefits to its employees. Eligible employees may contribute up to 17% of their compensation to the plan. The Company provides for a mandatory company match of 10% of employee contributionspaper, and ~~may~~marketable ~~also~~securities with ~~make~~maturities aof ~~discretionary~~three ~~matching~~months ~~contribution for each plan year equal to such dollar amount~~ or ~~percentage~~less ofand ~~employee~~credit ~~contributions~~card asreceivables ~~determined~~recorded at by the ~~Company’s~~time ~~Board~~ of ~~Directors~~sale. ~~Total~~Credit ~~company~~card ~~matches~~receivables ofwere $~~591,000,~~4.5 million ~~$534,000~~ and $~~757,000~~4.4 million ~~were recorded~~ as ~~expense~~of ~~for 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Prior to~~ January 1 31, ~~1998,~~2004 ~~the Company had separate contributory profit-sharing plans for Pearle~~ and ~~AVC employees meeting certain service requirements as defined in the plans. Effective January~~ February 1, ~~1998~~2003, ~~eligible employees of Pearle and AVC were permitted to participate in the Company’s defined contribution plan~~respectively. ~~The Pearle and AVC plans will be merged into the Company’s plan.~~

~~F-15~~ In addition, overdrafts resulting from outstanding checks at the end of each reporting period are reclassified as current liabilities in either accounts payable or accrued expenses. This reclassification to accounts payable amounted to $21.1 million and $28.4 million at January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, respectively, and to accrued expenses amounted to $3.8 million and $3.2 million at January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, respectively.

		The Company has several Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans that provide for the payment of retirement benefits to participating executives supplementing amounts payable under the Company’s noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. The first plan is an excess benefit plan designed to replace benefits that would otherwise have been payable under the pension plan but that were limited as a result of certain tax law changes. The second plan is a defined contribution plan under which participants receive an annual credit based on a percentage of base salary, subject to vesting requirements. The third plan is a defined benefit plan designed to provide additional retirement benefits for certain management and highly compensated employees. Expenses for these plans for fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 were $619,000, $696,000 and $651,000, respectively.
(9)		Segment Information
		The Company has two reportable segments: Cole Vision and Things Remembered. Most of Cole Vision’s revenue is provided by sales of prescription eyewear, accessories and services through its Cole Licensed Brands and Pearle retail locations. Cole Vision’s revenue is also provided by sales of merchandise to franchisees and other outside customers, by royalties based on sales, interest income on notes receivable and initial franchise fees from franchisees and by fees from managed vision care programs. The Cole Licensed Brands and Pearle segments have been aggregated in accordance with SFAS No. 131 based on the similarity of their economic characteristics, nature of products, services and production processes, types of customers, distribution methods and regulatory environment. Things Remembered’s revenue is provided by sales of engravable gift merchandise, personalization and other services primarily through retail stores and kiosks.
		The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (see Note 1). Performance is evaluated based on operating income from operations before interest, income taxes, and non-recurring or unusual charges.
		The reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately as each business requires different technology and marketing strategies. Cole Vision is subject to various state regulations related to the dispensing of prescription eyewear, its relationship with the doctors of optometry and other matters.

Valuation of Inventories

F Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost, or market, with cost based on the first-16in, first-out (FIFO) method, for the optical inventories and based on the weighted average cost method for the gift inventories. The Company records a valuation reserve for future inventory cost markdowns to be taken for inventory not expected to be part of its ongoing merchandise offering. The reserve is estimated based on historical information regarding sell through for similar products. The Company records a reserve for estimated shrinkage based on various factors including sales volume, historical shrink results and current trends.

~~Reported~~Notes ~~segment revenue, depreciation and amortization, income or loss, with reconciliations to consolidated amounts are as follows (000’s omitted):~~Receivable

			2000			1999			1998
Net revenue:
	Cole Vision		$	800,561		$	778,995		$	803,547
	Things Remembered			275,859			258,586			241,947
		Consolidated net revenue	$	1,076,420		$	1,037,581		$	1,045,494
Depreciation and amortization:
	Cole Vision		$	24,820		$	26,266		$	21,712
	Things Remembered			10,260			10,916			10,485
		Total segment depreciation and amortization		35,080			37,182			32,197
	Corporate			2,271			1,303			606
		Consolidated depreciation and amortization	$	37,351		$	38,485		$	32,803
Income or loss:
	Cole Vision		$	20,755		$	17,915		$	54,287
	Things Remembered			25,811			22,706			17,647
		Total segment profit		46,566			40,621			71,934
	Unallocated amounts:
		Restructuring and other unusual items		—			—			(13,120	)
		Corporate expenses		(12,472	)		(6,061	)		(6,448	)
	Consolidated operating income (loss)			34,094			34,560			52,366
	Interest and other expense, net			(27,861	)		(26,683	)		(21,071	)
	Income before income taxes		$	6,233		$	7,877		$	31,295

Notes from Pearle’s franchisees are included in notes receivable. The franchise notes are collateralized by inventory, equipment, and leasehold improvements at each location, generally bear interest at the prime rate plus 3.0%, and require monthly payments of principal and interest over periods of up to ten years.

Reported segment assets, expenditures for capital additions and systems developments costs and acquisitions of businesses, with reconciliations to consolidated amounts, are as follows (000’s omitted):F-9

			2000			1999			1998
Segment assets:
	Cole Vision		$	423,709		$	418,687		$	438,509
	Things Remembered			141,484			141,511			132,232
		Total segment assets		565,193			560,198			570,741
	Elimination of intercompany receivables			(43,949	)		(52,917	)		(36,440	)
	Corporate cash and temporary cash investments			26,416			21,024			34,506
	Other corporate assets			12,375			59,966			54,037
		Consolidated assets	$	560,035		$	588,271		$	622,844
Expenditures for capital additions and systems development costs:
	Cole Vision		$	31,857		$	33,728		$	35,796
	Things Remembered			11,457			5,709			8,228
		Total segment expenditures		43,314			39,437			44,024
	Corporate			(28	)		79			692
		Consolidated expenditures	$	43,286		$	39,516		$	44,716
Expenditures for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired Cole Vision			$	—		$	2,956		$	7,231

~~F-17~~ Property and Equipment

~~Revenue~~ Property ~~from~~and ~~external~~equipment ~~customers~~are stated at cost. Repairs and maintenance costs that extend the life of ~~each~~the ~~group~~asset are capitalized. Depreciation is provided principally by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of ~~similar~~the ~~products~~related assets, generally 2 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and ~~services~~equipment, 2 isto as25 years ~~follows~~for ~~(000’s~~leasehold ~~omitted):~~improvements and 5 to 40 years for buildings and improvements.

		2000		1999		1998
Sales of optical products and services		$	733,410	$	724,546	$	754,852
Royalties, interest income and initial fees from franchises			21,653		22,361		21,518
Fees from managed vision care programs			45,498		32,088		27,177
	Total Cole Vision net revenue		800,561		778,995		803,547
Retail sales of gift merchandise and services			275,859		258,586		241,947
	Consolidated net revenue	$	1,076,420	$	1,037,581	$	1,045,494

Property and equipment at cost, consist of the following at January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 (dollars in thousands):

	The Company operates primarily in the United States. Net revenue attributable to Cole Vision’s Canadian operations was $31.3 million, $28.6 million and $27.5 million in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Long-lived assets located in Canada at February 3, 2001, January 29, 2000 and January 30, 1999 totaled $3.4 million, $3.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively.
	2003		2002
(10)	Commitments
Land and building	$	5,251	$	2,414
	The Company leases a substantial portion of its facilities including laboratories, office and warehouse space, and retail store locations. These leases generally have initial terms of up to 10 years and often contain renewal options. Certain of the store locations have been sublet to franchisees. In most leases covering retail store locations, additional rents are payable based on store sales. In addition, Cole Vision operates departments in various host stores paying occupancy costs solely as a percentage of sales under agreements containing short-term cancellation clauses. Generally, the Company is required to pay taxes and normal expenses of operating the premises for laboratory, office, warehouse and retail store leases; the host stores pay these expenses for departments operated on a percentage-of-sales basis. The following amounts represent rental expense for fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 (000’s omitted):
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		194,946		196,384
Leasehold improvements		109,609		111,138
Construction-in-progress		2,084		2,477
Total property and equipment	$	311,890	$	312,413

	2000			1999			1998
Occupancy costs based on sales	$	54,854		$	52,623		$	54,563
All other rental expense		96,924			96,084			92,043
Sublease rental income		(21,354	)		(21,672	)		(22,606	)
	$	130,424		$	127,035		$	124,000

Capitalized Lease Property

At Capitalized ~~February~~lease 3,assets ~~2001~~are ~~and~~amortized ~~January~~using ~~29,~~the ~~2000,~~straight-line ~~property~~method over ~~under~~the ~~capital~~term ~~leases consisted~~ of ~~$2,026,000~~the ~~and $2~~lease,~~044,000~~ or in ~~equipment~~accordance with ~~accumulated~~practices ~~amortization~~established for similar owned assets if ownership transfers to the Company at the end of ~~$1,462,000~~the lease ~~and~~term. ~~$1,251,000~~Capital lease assets are included in ~~fiscal~~property ~~2000~~and equipment and are ~~1999,~~$5.5 million ~~respectively~~and $3.9 million Atin ~~February~~fiscal 3,2003 ~~2001~~and 2002, ~~future~~respectively ~~minimum~~and accumulated ~~lease~~amortization ~~payments~~is $3.2 million and ~~sublease~~$2.6 million ~~income~~in ~~receipts~~fiscal ~~under~~2003 ~~noncancellable leases~~and 2002, ~~and~~respectively. ~~the~~Amortization ~~present~~is ~~value~~included ofwith ~~future~~depreciation ~~minimum~~expense ~~lease~~and was ~~payments~~$0.6 million, ~~for~~$0.3 million ~~capital~~and ~~leases~~$0.2 million ~~are~~in asfiscal ~~follows~~2003, ~~(000’s~~2002 ~~omitted):~~and 2001, respectively.

			Operating Leases
	Capital
	Leases		Payments		Receipts
2001	$	49	$	73,938	$	(11,943	)
2002		55		63,203		(9,171	)
2003		—		54,815		(7,164	)
2004		—		47,526		(5,449	)
2005		—		37,066		(3,681	)
2006 and thereafter		—		88,213		(5,998	)
Total future minimum lease payments	$	104	$	364,761	$	(43,406	)
Amount representing interest		8
Present value of future minimum lease payments	$	96

Software and Development Costs

F Software development and implementation costs are expensed until the Company has determined that the software will result in probable future economic benefits and management has committed to funding the project. Thereafter, all direct costs to develop or obtain internal use software, including internal costs, are capitalized in other assets and amortized over the estimated useful life of the software using the straight-18line method. Amortization periods range from two to seven years and begin when the software is placed in service. At January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, these costs were $71.0 million and $65.8 million, respectively and accumulated amortization was $46.2 million and $34.1 million, respectively. Amortization of software development costs in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $9.6 million, $7.9 million and $7.7 million, respectively.

InGoodwill ~~the~~and ~~ordinary~~Other ~~course~~Intangible of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. The Company is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or the financial position of the Company. Assets

F Goodwill, noncompete agreements and tradename assets were amortized over their estimated useful economic life using the straight-19line method and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Beginning with fiscal year 2002, all goodwill and tradename amortization ceased in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142), and both goodwill and tradenames are tested at least annually for impairment. The Company adopted the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter for the annual impairment review. Other intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives based on management’s estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue.

~~REPORT~~Long-Lived OFAsset ~~INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES~~ Recoverability

TO Long-lived ~~THE~~assets, ~~BOARD~~including OFfinite ~~DIRECTORS~~lived OFintangible ~~COLE~~assets, ~~NATIONAL~~are reviewed ~~GROUP~~for impairment when facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. When necessary, ~~INC~~impaired assets are written down to estimated fair value based on the best information available. Estimated fair value is generally based on either appraised value or measured by discounting estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. Impairment charges include the write-down of long-lived assets at stores (Cole Vision and Things Remembered) and purchased software (unallocated corporate expense) that were assessed for impairment because changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment charges recorded to operating expenses by segment follows (dollars in thousands):

~~We have audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States the consolidated financial statements of Cole National Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in Form 10~~F-~~K, and have issued our report thereon~~10 dated March 26, 2001. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on those statements taken as a whole. The financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management and are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and are not part of the consolidated financial statements. These schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly state in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

Cleveland, Ohio, March 26, 2001.


	2003		2002		2001
Cole Vision	$	1,671	$	444	$	2,848
Things Remembered		185		455		890
Purchased software		2,550		—		—

Total impairment charges	$	4,406	$	899	$	3,738

~~F-20~~ Unamortized Debt Issuance Cost

~~Schedule~~ Financing costs incurred in connection with obtaining long-term debt are capitalized in other assets and amortized over the life of the related debt using the effective interest method. At January I31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, deferred financing costs net of accumulated amortization were $6,023,000 and $6,976,000, respectively. Amortization of financing costs included in interest expense in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $1,192,000, $1,128,000 and $1,150,000, respectively.

~~COLE~~Income ~~NATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT~~ Taxes

The Company is included in the consolidated federal income tax returns of Cole National ~~Group~~Corporation and has been charged (credited) an amount equal to the taxes that would have been payable by it if it were a corporation filing a separate return. Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, ~~Inc~~deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. This ~~Condensed~~method ~~Balance~~also ~~Sheets~~requires the recognition of future tax benefits such as net ~~February 3~~operating loss carryforwards, ~~2001~~to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. Deferred tax assets and ~~January 29,~~liabilities ~~2000~~are measured ~~(Dollars~~using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in ~~millions)~~the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company includes interest on prior year taxes in income tax expense.

		2000		1999
Assets:
Cash		$	26.4	$	21.0
Deferred income tax benefits			2.5		4.3
Investment in subsidiaries			391.8		401.2
Property and equipment, net			3.6		3.9
Other			8.0		8.3
	Total assets	$	432.3	$	438.7
Liabilities and stockholder’s equity:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	12.5	$	19.9
Payable to affiliates			85.9		86.7
Long-term debt			274.4		274.7
Other long-term liabilities			5.2		4.1
Stockholder’s equity			54.3		53.3
	Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	432.3	$	438.7

Derivatives and Hedging Activity

F The interest rate swap agreements utilized by the Company are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying fixed rate debt obligations and are recorded at fair value as an increase in noncurrent assets or liabilities and an increase or decrease in long-21term debt. These interest rate swaps qualify for the short-cut method for assessing hedge effectiveness under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133) and as amended by SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps are offset by the changes in fair value of the underlying debt.

~~Schedule I~~ Self Insurance

~~Cole~~ Due ~~National~~to ~~Group~~the significant deductible under its insurance policies, ~~Inc~~the Company is primarily self-insured for property loss, workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability costs. ~~(continued)~~The liabilities are determined actuarially based on claims filed and estimates for claims incurred but not reported. These liabilities are not discounted.

~~Condensed~~Accrued ~~Statements of Operations and Cash Flows 53 Weeks Ended February 3, 2001, 52 Weeks Ended January 29, 2000 and 52 Weeks Ended January 30, 1999 (Dollars in millions)~~ Liabilities

				February 3,			January 29,			January 30,
				2001			2000			1999
Revenue — services to affiliates				$	16.4		$	10.4		$	8.6
Operating expenses					14.3			10.4			11.8
Interest expense					0.3			0.1			2.4
Pre-tax income (loss)					1.8			(0.1	)		(5.6	)
Income tax benefit					(0.4	)		(0.9	)		(1.4	)
Income (loss) before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries and extraordinary items					2.2			0.8			(4.2	)
Equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries					(0.4	)		3.7			23.5
Net income					1.8			4.5			19.3
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used for) operating activities					6.8			(7.1	)		(22.3	)
			Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities		8.6			(2.6	)		(3.0	)
Investing activities:
	Other				(1.6	)		(2.1	)		(0.3	)
			Net cash used for investing activities		(1.6	)		(2.1	)		(0.3	)
Financing activities:
		Repayment of long-term debt			(0.4	)		(0.3	)		(14.8	)
		Advances to affiliates			(0.8	)		(9.0	)		(2.1	)
		Payment of financing fees			(.4	)		(0.3	)		—
		Other			—			0.6			—
			Net cash used for financing activities		(1.6	)		(9.0	)		(16.9	)
Net change in cash					5.4			(13.7	)		(20.2	)
Cash, beginning of period					21.0			34.7			54.9
Cash, end of period				$	26.4		$	21.0		$	34.7

Accrued liabilities consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

F-22


	2003		2002
Accrued payroll liabilities and related liabilities	$	32,438	$	23,507
Customer deposits		19,291		17,479
Insurance reserve		11,904		10,513
Other		31,408		40,790

	$	95,041	$	92,289

~~Schedule I~~F-11

~~Note~~Other toLong-Term ~~Condensed Financial Information of Registrant~~ Liabilities

~~The~~ Other ~~accompanying financial information of Cole National Group, Inc., a wholly~~long-~~owned~~term ~~subsidiary~~liabilities ofconsist ~~Cole~~primarily ~~National Corporation, is as~~ of ~~February 3,~~certain ~~2001~~employee ~~and~~benefit ~~January 29~~obligations, ~~2000~~deferred ~~and~~lease ~~for~~credits ~~the 53 weeks ended February 3,~~ and ~~52 weeks~~other ~~ended~~lease-related ~~January 29~~obligations, ~~2000~~ and ~~January 30,~~other ~~1999.~~obligations ~~Cole~~not ~~National~~expected ~~Group~~to isbe apaid ~~holding~~within ~~company for its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Things Remembered, Inc~~12 months.~~, Cole Vision~~ ~~Corporation~~Deferred ~~and~~lease ~~Pearle,~~credits ~~Inc.,~~are ~~except~~amortized ~~for~~on ~~expenses~~a ~~associated~~straight-line ~~with~~basis ~~Cole~~over ~~National Group’s~~the ~~corporate offices, consisted~~ life of nothe ~~other~~applicable ~~operations~~lease.

~~This~~Foreign ~~financial~~Currency ~~information should be in connection with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Cole National Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K.~~ Translation

~~F-23~~ The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated to United States dollars at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at average rates of exchange for the foreign subsidiary. Translation adjustments are presented as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholder’s equity.

~~Schedule~~Fair II Value of Financial Instruments

~~Cole~~ Due ~~National~~to ~~Group~~their short-term nature, ~~Inc.~~the ~~and~~carrying ~~Subsidiaries~~value of the Company’s cash ~~Valuation~~and cash equivalents, credit card and ~~Qualifying~~other ~~Accounts~~receivables, and short-term 53borrowings ~~Weeks~~approximate ~~Ended~~fair ~~February 3,~~value. ~~2001~~The fair value of the notes receivables 52has ~~Weeks~~not ~~Ended~~been ~~January 29,~~determined ~~2000~~due to nonmarketability and related party nature of 52the ~~Weeks~~notes. ~~Ended~~Fair ~~January 30,1999~~value estimates for the Company’s derivative and debt ~~(Dollars~~instruments inare ~~millions)~~based on market prices when available or are derived from financial valuation methodologies such as discounted cash flow analyses.

		Charged
		Balance at		(Reversals)						Balance
		Beginning		to Cost and						End of
Description		of Period		Expenses			Deductions			Period
February 3, 2001
Allowance for doubtful accounts		$	7.6	$	4.6		$	(4.9	)(A)	$	7.3
Franchise repurchase reserve			4.2		0.8			(0.5	)(A)		4.5
January 29, 2000
Allowance for doubtful accounts		$	7.2	$	4.3		$	(3.9	)(A)	$	7.6
Franchise repurchase reserve			5.2		0.3			(1.3	)(A)		4.2
Restructuring-
	1998 Charge	$	6.1	$	(0.1	)	$	(6.0	)		—
	1996 Charge		1.0		—			(1.0	)		—
January 30, 1999
Allowance for doubtful accounts		$	7.1		0.9		$	(0.8	)(A)	$	7.2
Franchise repurchase reserve			6.7		—			(1.5	)(A)		5.2
Discontinued operation reserve			1.3		—			(1.3	)(B)		—
Restructuring-
	1998 Charge	$	—	$	13.9		$	(7.8	)	$	6.1
	1997 Charge		4.8		(2.3	)		(2.5	)		—
	1996 Charge		21.8		(10.0	)		(10.8	)		1.0

Capital Stock

~~(A)~~ At February ~~Receivable~~2, ~~balances~~2002 ~~written~~and ~~off~~February 3, ~~net~~2001, ofthere ~~recoveries~~were 1,100 shares of ~~(B) Discontinued~~common ~~operation~~stock, ~~charges~~par ~~taken~~value ~~against~~$.01 ~~the~~per ~~reserve~~share, authorized, issued and outstanding.

~~Reserve~~Earnings ~~balances~~Per ~~presented~~Common ~~in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are not presented in this schedule.~~ Share

~~F-24~~ Earnings per common share and weighted average number of common shares outstanding data for 2003, 2002 and 2001 have been omitted as the presentation of such information, considering the Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Cole National Corporation, is not meaningful.

~~EXHIBIT~~Related ~~INDEX~~ Party Transactions

Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1(i)		Certificate of Incorporation of Cole National Group, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
3.2(ii)		By-Laws of Cole National Group, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2(ii) to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
4.1		Indenture dated November 15, 1996, by and among Cole National Group and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 9 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 (the form of which Senior Subordinated Note is included in such Indenture), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Cole National Corporation’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on December 2, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).
4.2		Indenture dated August 22, 1997, between Cole National Group, Inc. and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Cole National Group, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-34963).
4.3		Cole National Group by this filing agrees, upon request, to file with the Commission the instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Cole National Group and its subsidiaries where the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of the total assets of Cole National Group and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
10.1		Lease Agreement (Knoxville) dated as of November 28, 1979 by and between Tommy Hensley, as agent for the real property of Mrs. Don Siegel and Cole Vision Corporation, as amended and supplemented, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.2		Lease Agreement (Memphis) dated as of October 2, 1991 by and between Shelby Distribution Park and Cole Vision Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.3		Lease Agreement (Richmond) dated as of April 23, 1982 by and between Daniel, Daniel & Daniel and Cole Vision Corporation, as amended and supplemented, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.4		Lease for Multi-Tenancy Space (Salt Lake) dated as of October 30, 1981 by and between East Centennial Joint Venture and Cole Vision Corporation, as amended and supplemented, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.5		Form of Lease Agreement Finite 19518 dated as of December 29, 1988 between Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Cole Vision Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.6		Lease Agreement (Knoxville) dated as of April 11, 1995 by and between Richard T. Fox and Cole Vision Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).
10.7		Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors of Cole National Corporation, incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.8		Form of Indemnification Agreement for Officers of Cole National Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.9		Form of License Agreement (Optical), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).

Cole National Corporation allocates certain expenses to the Company for Director fees, certain public company expenses and professional fees. Amounts allocated to the Company were $3.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.6 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The amount in fiscal 2003 includes the shareholder litigation settlement. The balance of payable to affiliates is due on demand.

~~X-1~~ Comprehensive Income

~~EXHIBIT~~ The ~~INDEX~~following table presents the beginning balance, annual activity and ending balance of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (dollars in thousands):

Exhibit
Number		Description
10.10		Form of License/Lease Agreement (Optical), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.11		Agreement for the Allocation of Federal Income Tax Liability and Benefits among Members of the Parent Group dated August 23, 1985, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).
10.12		Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as of September 30, 1993 between Cole National Corporation and Cole National Group, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).
10.13		Lease agreement (Salt Lake) dated as of November 1, 1996 by and between Gibbons Realty Company and Cole Vision Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of Cole National Corporation’s quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).
10.14		Credit Agreement, dated as of November 15, 1996, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc., Cole Gift Centers, Inc., Pearle, Inc. and Pearle Service Corporation and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Cole National Corporation’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on December 2, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).
10.15		Cole National Group Guarantee and Cash Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 15, 1996, by Cole National Group and Cole National Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Cole National Corporation’s Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on December 2, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).
10.16		Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 15, 1996, by Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc., Cole Gift Centers, Inc., Pearle, Inc. and Pearle Service Corporation and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Cole National Corporation’s Report on Form 8-K, field with the Commission on December 2, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).
10.17		First Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of January 13, 1997, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc., Cole Gift Centers, Inc., Pearle, Inc., and Pearle Service Corporation and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Cole National Group, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-34963).
10.18		Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 8, 1997, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc., Cole Gift Centers, Inc., Pearle, Inc. and Pearle Service Corporation and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Cole National Group, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-34963).
10.19		Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of May 15, 1998, among Cole Vision Corporation and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cole National Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 1998 (File No. 1-12814).
10.20		Fourth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 5, 1999, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc. and Pearle, Inc., and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814).
10.21*		Cole National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan dated as of December 17, 1998, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814).
10.22*		Instrument Designating Participants of the Cole National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan dated December 17, 1998, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814).

F-12

COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC.

May 3, 2001

William P. Lahiff, Jr.

William P. Lahiff, Jr.

Senior Vice President and Controller

EXHIBIT INDEX


	Foreign			Minimum			Accumulated
	Currency			Pension			Other
	Translation			Liability			Comprehensive
	Adjustment			Adjustment			Income (Loss)
Balance at February 3, 2001	$	(664	)	$	—		$	(664	)
Activity in fiscal 2001		(441	)		—			(441	)

Balance at February 2, 2002		(1,105	)		—			(1,105	)
Activity in fiscal 2002		377			(20,652	)		(20,275	)
Tax benefit (expense)		—			6,987			6,987

Balance at February 1, 2003		(728	)		(13,665	)		(14,393	)
Activity in fiscal 2003		728			(2,891	)		(2,163	)
Tax benefit (expense)		—			1,253			1,253

Balance at January 31, 2004	$	—		$	(15,303	)	$	(15,303	)

Exhibit
Number		Description
10.23*		Cole National Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of February 1, 1999, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814).
10.24*		Amendment No. 1, dated as of December 17, 1998, to the Cole National Group, Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814).
10.25*		Employment Agreement entered into as of December 17, 1998 by and among Cole National Corporation, Cole National Group, Inc., Cole Vision Corporation, Pearle Inc., Things Remembered, Inc. and Jeffrey A. Cole, incorporated by reference to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K in the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814)
10.26		Fifth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of August 20, 1999, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc. and Pearle, Inc., and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cole National Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 1999 (File No. 1-12814).
10.27		Sixth Amendment and Waiver to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2000, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc. and Pearle, Inc., and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 2001 (File No. 1-12814).
10.28*		Instrument Designating Participant of the Cole National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan dated January 1, 2000, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.66 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 2001 (File No. 1-12814).
10.29*		Addendum to Employment Agreement dated June 4, 1999 among Jeffrey A. Cole, Cole National Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 2001 (File No. 1-12814).
10.30		Seventh Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2000 among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc., and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.69 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 2001 (File No. 1-12814).
24		Power(s) of Attorney

Stock-Based Compensation

X Cole National Corporation has various stock-based compensation plans in which key employees of the Company are eligible to participate. The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, for Cole National Corporation’s stock-based compensation plans. The Company measures compensation expense for employee stock options as the aggregate difference between the market value of Cole National Corporation’s common stock and the exercise price of the options on the date that both the number of shares the grantee is entitled to receive and the exercise price are known. In fiscal 2003, certain stock options were exercised by using a feature permitting a cashless exercise of options through the use of vested options in payment of the exercise price. This feature creates an arrangement that requires variable accounting, beginning with the third quarter of fiscal 2003. Previous to the fiscal 2003 transactions, such options had been accounted for as fixed grants based on the presumption that this feature would not be utilized as evidenced by Cole National Corporations's historical experience of this feature not being used. For the stock option agreements that have this cashless exercise feature, compensation expense is measured as the amount by which the quoted market value of the shares exceeds the option price at the end of each period. All stock options requiring variable accounting are fully vested. Compensation expense associated with stock options requiring variable accounting was $3.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. Compensation expense associated with Cole National Corporation’s restricted stock grants are not allocated to the Company. For SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (SFAS 123) purposes, the fair value of each option granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rates of 2.8%, 4.6% and 4.8% for grants in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, volatility of 50%, 49-50% and 47-49% in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and expected lives of six years for options granted in all fiscal years. The weighted average fair value of options granted during fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 at the date of grant was $5.39, $9.50 and $6.31, respectively. Tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity are allocated to the Company. Per the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosures” (SFAS 148), pro forma information relating to the fair value of stock-based compensation is summarized as follows:

F-13


	2003			2002			2001
	(In thousands)
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(7,828	)	$	(7,337	)	$	(510	)
Additions for stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related taxes		2,066			—			—
Deductions for total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related taxes		(1,117	)		(2,200	)		(1,208	)

Net income (loss), pro forma	$	(6,879	)	$	(9,537	)	$	(1,718	)

Retirement Plans

The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension plans and its nonpension postretirement benefit plans using actuarial models required by SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” (SFAS 87) and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” (SFAS 106), respectively. These models use an attribution approach that generally spreads individual events over the service lives of the employees in the plan. The Company accounts for other post-employment benefits under SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits” (SFAS 112), which requires the recognition of the obligation to provide benefits awarded to certain individuals.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of SFAS Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (SFAS 145). SFAS 145 states that the rescission of SFAS No. 4 shall be applied in fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt that was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented that does not meet the criteria in APB Opinion 30 for classification as an extraordinary item shall be reclassified as an item of continuing operations. The Company adopted SFAS 145 as of the beginning of fiscal 2003. As a result, the loss on early extinguishment of debt reported as an extraordinary item for the year ended February 1, 2003 has been reclassified. The pretax loss from the early extinguishment of debt has been presented as a separate line within interest and other (income) expenses and the related income tax benefit reduced the reported income tax provision. Other portions of the statement are not applicable to the Company.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46) and revised FIN 46 (FIN 46R) in December 2003. The Interpretations require certain variable interest entities, including certain special purpose entities, to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary if the equity investors in the entity do not have all the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk. The Interpretations immediately apply to entities created after January 31, 2003, are effective at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 for certain special purpose entities and are effective for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 for other existing variable interest entities. The synthetic operating lease for the Highland Heights, Ohio facility required consolidation under this Interpretation. The consolidation resulted in an additional $2.2 million in assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Management is still assessing the impacts of this Interpretation on its consolidated financial statements regarding existing variable interest entities within its franchise operations.

F-14

In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (Revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits” (SFAS 132). This statement revises employers’ disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans to require more information about the economic resources and obligations of such plans. Certain disclosure provisions were effective for fiscal 2003 and were adopted. The remaining disclosure provisions of SFAS 132 will be adopted during fiscal 2004.

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 149), which amends and clarifies accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain embedded derivatives and for hedging activities under SFAS 133. SFAS 149 was adopted in fiscal 2003 and had no effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) was signed into law. In accordance with FASB Staff Position 106-1, the Company’s measures of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost in the consolidated financial statements and in Note 6 do not reflect the effects of the Act on the Company’s postretirement benefit plan. Specific authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy is pending and, when issued, could require the Company to change previously reported information.

(2)

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company adopted SFAS 142 in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. This statement requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives will no longer be amortized, but instead, will be subject to review for impairment annually, or more frequently if certain indicators arise. With the adoption of this statement, the Company ceased amortization of goodwill and tradenames as of February 3, 2002.

The Company completed the transitional impairment testing of goodwill and tradenames during the second quarter of fiscal 2002 as required by SFAS 142. Based on the findings of its outside valuation advisor and other things, the Company concluded that there was no impairment at the adoption date of the new accounting standard, effective February 3, 2002. The Company elected to perform its annual tests for potential impairment as of the first day of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter. Based on its annual tests, the Company has concluded that there was no impairment of its goodwill or tradenames for fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002.

The following table provides the comparable effects of adopting SFAS 142 for the three years ended January 31, 2004, February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002.


	2003			2002			2001
	(In thousands)
Net income (loss):
Reported net income (loss)	$	(7,828	)	$	(7,337	)	$	(510	)
Goodwill amortization — Cole Vision		—			—			2,825
Goodwill amortization — Things Remembered		—			—			948
Tradename amortization — Cole Vision		—			—			1,237
Related tax adjustment		—			—			(680	)

Adjusted net income (loss)	$	(7,828	)	$	(7,337	)	$	3,820

Other intangible assets consist of (dollars in thousands):

F-15


	2003			2002
Non-amortizable:
Tradename	$	49,460		$	49,460

Amortizable:
Noncompete agreements		320			240
Contracts		8,947			8,847
Customer records		9			—

Total amortizable		9,276			9,087

Accumulated amortization		(8,963	)		(7,644	)

	$	49,773		$	50,903

During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company purchased the operations of three Sears Optical departments in California for a total purchase price of $242,500. The amount allocated to the tangible fixed assets acquired including exam equipment and inventory was $29,500. The remainder of the purchase price was allocated to intangible assets under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations”. Goodwill related to this transaction was $124,000 and noncompete agreements and customer records totaled $89,000. The change in the carrying amount of contracts for fiscal 2003 resulted primarily from a contingent payment for a previously acquired provider network. The additional change in the carrying amount of goodwill was due to foreign currency translation at Cole Vision.

The net carrying amount of goodwill at January 31, 2004, by business segment was $64.3 million at Cole Vision and $21.4 million at Things Remembered.

(3)

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt at January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 is summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

F-16


	2003			2002
8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes	$	150,000		$	150,000
8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes, including fair market value adjustments related to interest rate swap		125,459			125,807
Capital lease obligations		2,134			978
Debt of variable interest entity		2,244			—

		279,837			276,785
Less current portion		(608	)		(232	)

Net long-term debt	$	279,229		$	276,553

On August 15, 2003, the Company retired $385,000 of 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due December 31, 2006 that the Company had received as part of the full repayment for a note receivable from the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO). A $15,400 gain on early extinguishment of debt and $15,400 of compensation expense were recorded in connection with the transaction.

On May 22, 2002, the Company issued $150.0 million of 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes that mature in 2012. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually on each May 15 and November 15. Net proceeds from the 8-7/8% note offering, together with cash on hand, were used to retire $150.0 million of 9-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 and pay premiums and other costs associated with retiring those notes. The Company’s results for fiscal 2002 included a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $11.1 million representing the payment of premiums and other costs of retiring the notes and the write-offs of unamortized discount and deferred financing fees.

On August 22, 1997, the Company issued $125.0 million of 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes that mature in 2007 with no earlier scheduled redemption or sinking fund payments. Interest on the 8-5/8% notes is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15.

The 8-5/8% notes and the 8-7/8% notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company, subordinated in right of payment to senior indebtedness of the Company and senior in right of payment to any current or future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The indentures pursuant to which the 8-5/8% notes and the 8-7/8% notes were issued restrict dividend payments to Cole National Corporation. The indentures also contain certain optional and mandatory redemption features and other financial covenants.

At January 31, 2004, the fair value of long-term debt was approximately $305.0 million compared to a carrying value of $279.2 million. The fair value was estimated primarily by using quoted market prices. The Company has no significant principal payment obligations under its outstanding indebtedness until 2007, when the $125.0 million 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes are due. Following the consummation of the Merger with Luxottica, the holders of the 8-5/8% notes and the 8-7/8% notes will have the right to put the notes to the Company at a price of 101% of par plus accrued interest.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements to take advantage of favorable market interest rates. These agreements require the Company to pay an average floating interest rate based on six-month LIBOR plus 4.5375% to a counter party while receiving a fixed interest rate on a portion of the Company’s $125.0 million of 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007. The counter party is a major commercial bank. The agreements mature August 15, 2007 and qualify as fair value hedges. The aggregate notional amount of the interest rate swap agreements is $50.0 million. At January 31, 2004, the floating rate of the swaps was approximately 5.8% and the fair value of the swap agreements was an unrealized gain of approximately $0.8 million. There was no impact to earnings in fiscal 2003 due to hedge ineffectiveness.

The Company subleases an office and general operating facility in Highland Heights, Ohio from the Parent who leases the property from a special purpose entity (the “Trust”), which was created in 1997 specifically for the purpose of structuring a four-year operating lease with annual renewal options up to six years. The lease provides for regular payments based on LIBOR plus 1.50%. In accordance with this agreement, the Parent must maintain compliance with a minimum net worth covenant. At the end

F-17

of this lease in 2007, the Parent has the option to purchase the property or arrange for the sale of the property. If the Parent does not exercise its purchase option at the end of the lease, it is contingently liable to the Trust for up to $1.7 million. The Parent does not believe it will have any payment obligation at the end of the lease because either the Parent will exercise the purchase option, or the net proceeds from the sale of the property will exceed the amount payable to the Trust.

Under FIN 46R, certain special purpose entities are required to be consolidated if it is determined that an enterprise is the primary beneficiary because it is deemed to have controlling financial interest in the entity. The Company has determined that it has controlling financial interest in the Trust since the Company is required to absorb any expected losses, will receive the majority of expected residual returns and is the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the Trust assets of $2.2 million and liabilities of $2.2 million have been consolidated into the financial statements of the Company as of January 31, 2004. Future operating results of the Trust will be consolidated in the financial statements of the Company and is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations.

(4)

Credit Facility

On June 27, 2003, the operating subsidiaries of the Company amended, restated and extended their working capital credit facility with their bank lenders. The maturity date of the credit facility was extended to February 1, 2007 from May 31, 2006. The size of the facility was adjusted to $60.0 million from $75.0 million. In addition, certain financial covenants were amended. Borrowings under the credit facility presently bear interest based on leverage ratios of the Company at a rate equal to either (a) the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.50% or (b) 1.50% plus the highest of (i) the CIBC prime rate, (ii) the three-week moving average of the secondary market rates for three-month certificates of deposit plus 1.0% or (iii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The Company pays a commitment fee of 0.75% per annum on the total unused portion of the facility based on the percentage of revolving credit commitments used. Cole National Corporation and the Company guarantee this credit facility. The credit facility is secured by the assets of the operating subsidiaries of the Company. On October 30, 2003, the credit facility was amended to permit indebtedness of up to $10.0 million of documentary letters of credit from sources other than the lenders and liens on inventory pursuant to documentary letters of credit issued under such financing.

The credit facility requires the principal operating subsidiaries of the Company to comply with various operating covenants that restrict corporate activities, including covenants restricting the ability of the subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated indebtedness, dispose of certain investments or make acquisitions. The credit facility also requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including covenants regarding interest coverage and maximum leverage. The Company is in compliance with the covenants in the credit agreement as of January 31, 2004 and the date of this report.

The credit facility restricts dividend payments to the Company from its subsidiaries to amounts needed to pay interest on the 8-7/8% notes and the 8-5/8% notes, certain amounts related to taxes and $7.5 million for direct expenses of the Company, along with up to 0.25% of the Company’s consolidated net revenue annually for other direct expenses of Cole National Corporation. If certain maximum leverage targets are met, the credit facility restricts dividend payments to the Company in an aggregate amount not to exceed $25.0 million to allow for the repurchase of Senior Subordinated Notes.

As of January 31, 2004, the total availability under the credit facility totaled $46.1 million after reduction for commitments outstanding of $13.9 million under letters of credit. There were no working capital borrowings under the credit facility outstanding as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003. The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding was $11.5 million during fiscal 2003 and $2.3 million during fiscal 2002. The weighted average interest rate was 5.5% for both fiscal 2003 and 2002.

(5)

Income Taxes

The income tax provision reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 are detailed below (dollars in thousands):

F-18


	2003			2002			2001
Current payable -
Federal	$	(567	)	$	522		$	750
State and local		551			538			1,335
Foreign		(172	)		633			295

		(188	)		1,693			2,380

Deferred -
Federal		(1,978	)		(2,670	)		2,854
State and local		(639	)		183			32
Foreign		(833	)		(1	)		43

		(3,450	)		(2,488	)		2,929

Income tax provision (benefit)	$	(3,638	)	$	(795	)	$	5,309

The exercise of nonqualified stock options during fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 resulted in $1.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively of income tax benefits to the Company derived from the difference between the market price at the date of exercise and the option price. These tax benefits were recorded in additional paid-in capital. Tax benefits from option exercises in fiscal 2001 were not significant.

The income tax provision differs from the federal statutory rate as follows (dollars in thousands):


	2003			2002			2001
Income tax provision (benefit) at statutory rate	$	(4,014	)	$	(2,846	)	$	1,680
Tax effect of -
Goodwill		—			—			1,451
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit		(422	)		533			900
Foreign income		20			199			59
Valuation allowance		89			484			988
Nondeductible expenses		277			296			331
Adjustment to prior year federal taxes		389			522			354
Research and development credit		(235	)		—			(265	)
Other, net		258			17			(189	)

Income tax provision (benefit)	$	(3,638	)	$	(795	)	$	5,309

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the Company’s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

F-19


	2003			2002
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued compensation and benefits	$	14,343		$	11,420
Deferred revenue		18,816			22,659
Other non-deductible accruals		11,732			8,432
Net operating loss carryforwards		5,250			8,961
Depreciation and amortization		4,692			—
Intangibles		3,976			4,373
Inventory basis differences		2,548			2,047
Leases		3,155			5,106
Contribution carryforward		1,179			1,223
Foreign tax credit carryforward		155			—
Other		1,261			2,005

Total deferred tax assets		67,107			66,226
Valuation allowance		(4,120	)		(4,371	)

Net deferred tax assets		62,987			61,855
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization		—			(3,713	)

Net deferred tax assets	$	62,987		$	58,142

At January 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $8.7 million of federal tax net operating loss carryforwards in the United States that expire in years 2004 through 2022. Of that amount, $7.7 million resulted from the Company’s acquisition of American Vision Centers (“AVC”). Due to the change in ownership requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, utilization of the AVC net operating loss is limited to approximately $0.3 million per year. Valuation allowances of $3.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million at January 31, 2004 have been established against net operating losses, charitable contribution carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, respectively to reduce the corresponding deferred tax assets to the amount that will likely be realized. The decrease in the valuation allowance in fiscal 2003 is primarily due to the operating loss tax carryforwards.

No provision of United States federal and state income taxes has been provided for the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries because those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to both United States income taxes (subject to an adjustment of foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable. Determination of the net amount of unrecognized U. S. income tax with respect to these earnings is not practicable.

(6)

Retirement Plans

The Company maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers employees who have met eligibility service requirements and are not members of certain collective bargaining units. The pension plan calls for benefits to be paid to eligible employees at retirement based primarily upon years of service and their compensation levels near retirement. In January 2002, the Company approved a plan freeze for all participants except for participants who are age 50 with 10 years of benefit service as of March 31, 2002. These participants had their average pay frozen as of March 31, 2002, and covered compensation frozen as of December 31, 2001, but their benefit service will continue to grow. The Company’s policy is to fund amounts necessary to keep the pension plan in full force and effect, in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

The Company also maintains a postretirement benefit plan in connection with the acquisition of Pearle in 1996. This plan was closed to new participants at the time of acquisition. Under this plan, the eligible former employees are provided life insurance and certain health care benefits through insurance premiums based on expected benefits to be paid during the year. Substantial portions of the health care benefits are not insured and are paid by the Company. For measurement purposes, a 13% annual rate of increase for health care benefits was assumed for fiscal 2004. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 8% over ten years and level thereafter. Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

F-20


	1 Percentage		1 Percentage
	Point Increase		Point Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components	$	33,500	$	(28,100	)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation		557,800		(468,500	)

On December 8, 2003 the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”) was signed into law. In accordance with FASB Staff Position 106-1, the Company’s measures of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost in the consolidated financial statements and disclosures herein do not reflect the effects of the Act on the Company’s postretirement benefit plan. Specific authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy is pending and, when issued, could require the Company to change previously reported information.

The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for its plans. The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status of the pension plan and postretirement benefits.


	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
	2003			2002			2003			2002
				(Dollars in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of period	$	40,122		$	28,825		$	4,109		$	2,879
Service cost		273			238			—			—
Interest cost		2,647			2,423			261			203
Actuarial loss		5,767			10,203			62			1,149
Benefits paid		(1,839	)		(1,147	)		(179	)		(159	)
Participants’ contributions		—			—			36			37
Administrative expenses paid		(433	)		(420	)		—			—

Benefit obligation at the end of the period		46,537			40,122			4,289			4,109

Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		24,107			28,861			—			—
Actual return of plan assets		4,240			(3,709	)		—			—
Employer contributions		—			522			143			122
Participants’ contributions		—			—			36			37
Benefits paid		(1,839	)		(1,147	)		(179	)		(159	)
Administrative expenses paid		(433	)		(420	)		—			—

Fair value of plan assets at end of year		26,075			24,107			—			—

Funded status		(20,462	)		(16,015	)		(4,289	)		(4,109	)
Employer contributions after measurement date		—			—			12			10
Unrecognized net actuarial loss		23,622			20,992			2,527			2,614
Unrecognized prior service cost		—			—			94			103
Unrecognized initial asset		(160	)		(340	)		—			—

Net amount recognized	$	3,000		$	4,637		$	(1,656	)	$	(1,382	)

Amounts recognized in the statements of financial position consist of:


	2003			2002			2003			2002
Accrued benefit cost:
Accrued liabilities	$	(7,475	)	$	—		$	(151	)	$	(152	)
Other long-term liabilities		(12,987	)		(16,015	)		(1,505	)		(1,230	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		23,462			20,652			—			—

	$	3,000		$	4,637		$	(1,656	)	$	(1,382	)

F-21

The current employer contribution for fiscal 2004 of $7,475,000 included in accrued liabilities was determined with the assumption that Congress will not grant further pension relief for the 2004 plan year.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $46,537,000 and $40,122,000 at December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.

Net pension expense and postretirement expense for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 includes the following components (dollars in thousands):


	Pension Benefits									Postretirement Benefits
	2003			2002			2001			2003			2002			2001
Service cost — benefits earned during the period	$	273		$	238		$	1,868		$	—		$	—		$	—
Interest cost on the projected benefit obligation		2,647			2,423			2,156			261			203			174
Expected return on plan assets		(2,594	)		(2,810	)		(2,720	)		—			—			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		1,491			284			—			149			83			76
Amortization of initial asset		(179	)		(179	)		(179	)		—			—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		—			—			25			9			9			9

Net expense (income)	$	1,638		$	(44	)	$	1,150		$	419		$	295		$	259

Increase in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income	$	2,810		$	20,652		$	—			N/A			N/A			N/A

Weighted average assumptions used to determine obligations at fiscal year end:
Discount rate		6.0	%		6.5	%		7.5	%		6.0	%		6.5	%		7.3	%
Rate of compensation increase		N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A			N/A
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net costs for the fiscal year:
Discount rate		6.5	%		7.5	%		7.8	%		6.5	%		7.3	%		7.8	%
Expected return on plan assets		9.0	%		9.0	%		9.5	%		N/A			N/A			N/A
Rate of compensation increase		N/A			N/A			3 to 7	%		N/A			N/A			N/A

The change in the discount rate reflects the overall decline in market interest rates and has led to an increase in the projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002. In addition, stock market declines in fiscal 2002 reduced the fair value of the pension plan’s assets at December 31, 2002. As a result of these factors, the pension benefit plan was underfunded by $20.5 million and $16.0 million at December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. In fiscal 2002, the Company wrote off its prepaid pension expense of $4.6 million and recorded the minimum pension liability by charging $20.7 million to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. In fiscal 2003, the Company recorded an increase in the minimum pension liability by charging $2.8 million to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is established based upon our expectations of asset returns over the expected period to fund participant benefits considering the plan’s current target asset allocation. We further validated this assumption with an independent expert using our target asset mix in an asset return generation model which projected future asset returns using simulation and asset class correlation.

The Company’s pension benefit plan weighted-average asset allocation at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and target allocation for 2004 are as follows:

F-22


							Plan Assets
	Asset Allocation 2004						at December 31,
	Target			Range			2003			2002
Large-Cap U.S. Equity		45.0	%		30% - 50	%		51	%		40	%
Small/Mid-Cap U.S. Equity		10.0	%		5% - 15	%		10	%		7	%
International Equity		10.0	%		5% - 15	%		8	%		7	%

Total Equity		65.0	%		60% - 75	%		69	%		54	%
Tactical Asset Allocation											19	%
Fixed Income		35.0	%		25% - 40	%		31	%		27	%

								100	%		100	%

The pension benefit plan investment policy provides the framework within which investment decisions are made, establishes standards to measure investment manager performance, outlines roles and responsibilities and describes the ongoing review process. The plan’s investment strategies include established asset allocation targets and ranges as set forth above to maximize the advantages of diversification and to minimize risk. The asset allocation targets disclosed above were implemented during 2003 and the tactical asset allocation category included in the previous target strategy was eliminated. The tactical asset allocation category in place at December 31, 2003 provided for investment in any mix of debt and/or equity at the discretion of the fund manager. At December 31, 2002, the 19% invested in tactical asset allocation was fully invested in equities.

Small/Mid-Cap Equity investments include the Parent’s common stock in the amounts of $160,000 (0.6% of total plan assets) and $91,000 (0.4% of total plan assets) at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The Company has a defined contribution plan, including features under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides retirement benefits to its employees. Eligible employees may contribute up to 17% of their compensation to the plan. In the United States, the Company changed the plan beginning with the 2003 fiscal year to provide for a mandatory company match in cash of 25% of the first 4% of employee contributions. During prior fiscal years, the plan provided a mandatory company match of 10% of employee contributions. The Company may also make a discretionary matching contribution for each plan year equal to such dollar amount or percentage of employee contributions as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. In Puerto Rico, the Company provides for a mandatory match of 50% of the first 6% of employee contributions. The plan provides for the investment of employer and employee contributions in the Parent’s common stock and other investment alternatives. The Company’s matching contributions, net of forfeitures, of $1.0 million, $1.0 million and $0.6 million were recorded as expense for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The Company has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), which provides for the payment of retirement benefits for certain management and highly compensated employees supplementing amounts payable under the Company’s non-contributory defined contribution plan. The benefits are unfunded and each participant’s SERP account is credited with a percentage of their base salary and interest earned for the year. Expenses for this plan for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The plan liability recorded primarily in other long-term liabilities was $2.6 million and $2.3 million at January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, respectively.

The Company has a deferred compensation plan for executives and other senior management which allows deferral of income without regard to limitations imposed by the Company’s 401(k) plan. The Company has generally made a contribution of the Parent’s common stock equal to 10% of the participant’s deferrals, however, in fiscal 2003 and 2002 the Company made cash contributions. The deferred compensation together with the Company’s contributions is funded through various marketable securities based on the election of the participant. As of fiscal year end 2003 and 2002, the Company had accrued $2.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively for its obligations under these plans in other long-term liabilities. The Company’s net expense, which includes the participants’ deferral, investment earnings and Company contributions was $1.3 million, $0.9 million and $1.3 million for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The investments made on behalf of the participants, other than purchase of the Parent’s common stock, are included in other noncurrent assets and were $2.5 million and $1.8 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Investments in the Parent’s common stock are recorded as paid in capital in stockholders’ equity.

The Company provides under certain conditions postemployment benefits for continuation of health care benefits and life insurance coverage to former employees after employment but before retirement. Pursuant to SFAS 112, the accrued cost for postemployment benefits was $2.5 million and $2.6 million at January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, respectively. The net

F-23

postemployment benefits (income) expense was $(0.1) million, $1.0 million and $0.1 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The Company has certain individual deferred compensation agreements, which provide guaranteed retirement benefits each year for life. The benefits are accrued over the estimated period in which the employee is to render service and becomes eligible for the benefit. The benefits are unfunded and a minimum pension liability of $81,000 was charged to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholder’s equity in fiscal 2003. Expenses for these agreements for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $2.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. At January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, the liability, which was recorded in other long-term liabilities, was $1.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively. In fiscal 2003, a lump sum payment of $4.6 million was made to the Company’s former Chairman and CEO under the terms of his separation agreement.

(7)

Segment Information

The Company has two reportable segments: Cole Vision and Things Remembered. Most of Cole Vision’s revenue is provided primarily by sales of prescription eyewear, accessories and services through its Cole Licensed Brands and Pearle retail locations. Cole Vision’s revenue is also provided by sales of merchandise to franchisees and other outside customers, by royalties based on sales and initial franchise fees from franchisees and by fees from managed vision care programs. Cole Vision is subject to various state regulations related to the dispensing of prescription eyewear, its relationship with the doctors of optometry and other matters. The Cole Licensed Brands, Pearle Vision and Cole Managed Vision business units have been aggregated in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (SFAS 131), based on the similarity of their economic characteristics, nature of products, services and production processes, types of customers, distribution methods and regulatory environment. Things Remembered’s revenue is provided by sales of engraveable gift merchandise, personalization and other services primarily through retail stores and kiosks. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (see Note 1).

The reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately as each business requires different technology and marketing strategies. Performance is evaluated based on operating income. Reported segment revenue, depreciation and amortization, and income or loss, with reconciliations to consolidated amounts are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	2003			2002			2001
Net revenues:
Cole Vision	$	919,512		$	877,550		$	836,869
Things Remembered		282,261			270,569			272,254

Total net revenues	$	1,201,773		$	1,148,119		$	1,109,123

Depreciation and amortization:
Cole Vision	$	27,047		$	22,554		$	25,508
Things Remembered		9,904			10,297			10,520

Total segment depreciation and amortization		36,951			32,851			36,028
Unallocated corporate depreciation		2,836			2,779			2,877

Total depreciation and amortization	$	39,787		$	35,630		$	38,905

Income:
Cole Vision	$	24,863		$	30,583		$	15,113
Things Remembered		21,433			15,060			24,149

Total segment operating income		46,296			45,643			39,262
Unallocated corporate expense		(34,286	)		(17,373	)		(9,596	)

Total operating income		12,010			28,270			29,666
Interest and other (income) expense, net		23,476			36,402			24,867

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	(11,466	)	$	(8,132	)	$	4,799

F-24

Reported segment assets, expenditures for capital additions and systems development costs and acquisitions of businesses, with reconciliations to consolidated amounts, are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	2003		2002		2001
Segment assets:
Cole Vision	$	424,385	$	421,661
Things Remembered		117,223		119,105

Total segment assets		541,608		540,766
Corporate cash and temporary cash investments		43,479		28,435
Other corporate assets		35,758		34,962

Consolidated assets	$	620,845	$	604,163

Expenditures for capital additions and systems development costs:
Cole Vision	$	23,300	$	31,502	$	26,288
Things Remembered		6,454		10,342		12,582

Total segment expenditures		29,754		41,844		38,870
Corporate		2,335		3,142		1,670

Consolidated expenditures	$	32,089	$	44,986	$	40,540

Contingent payments for and acquisition of business
Cole Vision	$	4,051	$	1,645	$	847

Revenues from external customers of each group of similar products and services is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	2003		2002		2001
Sales of optical products and services	$	810,290	$	783,765	$	751,680
Royalties and initial franchise fees		20,136		19,450		18,744
Fees from managed vision care programs		89,086		74,335		66,445

Total Cole Vision net revenue		919,512		877,550		836,869
Retail sales of gift merchandise and services		282,261		270,569		272,254

Consolidated net revenue	$	1,201,773	$	1,148,119	$	1,109,123

The Company operates primarily in the United States. Net revenues attributable to Cole Vision’s Canadian operations were $29.2 million, $28.6 million and $30.0 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Long-lived assets located in Canada at January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003 totaled $2.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively.

(8)

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company leases a substantial portion of its computers, equipment and facilities including laboratories, office and warehouse space, and retail store locations. These leases generally have initial terms of up to 10 years and often contain renewal or purchase options. Operating and capital lease obligations are based upon contractual minimum rates and, in most leases covering retail store locations, additional rents are payable based on store sales. In addition, Cole Vision operates departments in various host stores paying occupancy costs solely as a percentage of sales. The Sears agreement contains a short-term cancellation clause. Generally, the Company is required to pay taxes and normal expenses of operating the premises for laboratory, office, warehouse and retail store leases; the host stores pay these expenses for departments operated on a percentage-of-sales basis. The following amounts represent rental expense for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 (dollars in thousands):

F-25


	2003			2002			2001
Occupancy costs based on sales	$	63,182		$	58,966		$	56,923
All other rental expense		91,494			91,736			89,940
Sublease rental income		(14,638	)		(14,525	)		(16,270	)

Total rental expense, net	$	140,038		$	136,177		$	130,593

At January 31, 2004, future minimum lease payments and sublease income receipts under noncancelable leases and the present value of future minimum lease payments for capital leases are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Capital			Operating Leases
	Leases			Payments		Receipts
2004	$	643		$	77,244	$	(10,456	)
2005		599			64,647		(8,060	)
2006		557			52,818		(6,532	)
2007		417			41,772		(4,895	)
2008		296			33,141		(3,009	)
2009 and thereafter		102			77,006		(5,875	)

Total future minimum lease payments		2,614		$	346,628	$	(38,827	)

Amount representing interest		(480	)

Present value of future minimum lease payments	$	2,134

In fiscal 2001, under a sale and leaseback agreement, the Company received approximately $5.7 million, net of related costs, from the sale of its Pearle Vision lab and distribution facility in Dallas, Texas and leased it back under a fifteen-year operating lease agreement with four five-year renewal options. The transaction produced a gain of approximately $0.6 million that was deferred and is being amortized over the fifteen year lease period.

The Company guarantees future minimum lease payments for certain store locations leased directly by franchisees. These guarantees totaled approximately $13.4 and $13.8 million as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003. Performance under a guarantee by the Company is triggered by default of a franchisee in their lease commitment. Generally, these guarantees also extend to payments of taxes and other normal expenses payable under these leases, the amounts of which are not readily quantifiable. The term of the guarantees range from one to ten years of which many are limited to periods that are less than the full term of the leases involved. Under the terms of the guarantees, the Company has the right to assume the primary obligation and begin operating as a company-owned store. In addition, as part of many franchise agreements, the Company may recover any amounts paid under a guarantee from the defaulting franchisee. The Company has recorded a liability of $23,500, which represents the estimated fair value of the Company’s obligations from guarantees entered into or modified after December 31, 2002 using an expected present value calculation.

In fiscal 2000, the Company guaranteed certain borrowings of a franchisee with a bank in connection with operations of two franchised stores. The maximum exposure under the agreement is $333,000 and expires upon full payment of the term loan borrowings by the franchisee. The loan matures in 2010.

(9)

Legal Proceedings

F-26

dispensing optician, unlawful advertising of an optometrist, unlicensed practice of optometry, and illegal relationships between dispensing opticians, optical retailers and optometrists. The action seeks unspecified damages, restitution and injunctive relief. In July 2002, the State of California obtained a preliminary injunction to enjoin certain advertising practices and from charging dilation fees. The trial court’s decision was appealed by both the Company and the State. On November 26, 2003, the appellate court ruled on the appeal in a manner adverse to the Company with respect to continued advertising in California by Pearle Vision that expressly or implicitly advertises the furnishing of optometric services, disallowing continued advertising of the availability of optometric services with a disclaimer that had been previously approved by the trial court. The appellate court ruled in the Company’s favor with respect to charging dilation fees. On March 3, 2004, the California Supreme Court granted the Company’s petition for review of the Appellate Court’s decision. Although the Company believes that its advertising and operational practices in California complied with California law, the appellate ruling may, if unmodified by the Supreme Court, compel the Company to modify or close its activities in California. Further, the Company might be required to pay damages and or restitution in a currently undeterminable amount, the cost of which might have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and cash flow in one or more periods.

Things Remembered, Inc. settled a class action complaint in California alleging that the putative class (alleged to include 200 members) were improperly denied overtime compensation in violation of a California law. The action sought unspecified damages, interest, restitution, as well as declaratory and injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. On February 3, 2003, Things Remembered and the plaintiffs reached an agreement to resolve the lawsuit for $562,500. Preliminary approval was received from the Court on August 1, 2003. On December 3, 2003, the Court approved final settlement of the lawsuit. A liability of $562,500 was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

Cole National Corporation settled a class action lawsuit alleging claims for various violations of federal securities laws related to the Company’s publicly reported revenues and earnings. The action, which pleaded claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and named the Parent and certain present and former officers and directors as defendants, sought unspecified compensatory damages, punitive damages “where appropriate”, costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. On May 30, 2003, the Parent and the plaintiffs reached an agreement to resolve the lawsuit. On September 29, 2003, the Court approved final settlement of the lawsuit. A charge of $2,687,500 was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 with respect to the Company’s portion of the settlement.

Following the Company’s announcement in November 2002 of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements, the Securities and Exchange Commission began an investigation into the Company’s previous accounting. The course of this investigation or other litigation or investigations arising out of the restatement of the Company’s financial statements cannot be predicted. In addition, under certain circumstances the Company would be obliged to indemnify the individual current and former directors and officers who are named as defendants in litigation or who are or become involved in an investigation. The Company believes it has insurance that should be available with respect to a portion of its indemnification obligations. If the Company is unsuccessful in defending against the current investigation or any litigation, there may be a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.

The Company has been named as a defendant along with numerous other retailers, in patent infringement litigation challenging the defendants’ use of bar code technology. A stay of the proceeding has been sought and was granted, in deference to prior pending declaratory judgment suits brought by the manufacturers and suppliers of the implicated technology seeking to declare the patents in suit not infringed. On January 23, 2004, a court in Nevada entered a memorandum of decision in favor of a manufacturer declaring the patents not infringed. This judgment is expected to be appealed, and the infringement litigation against the Company will remain stayed pending the final resolution any such appeal. The Company believes it has available defenses and does not expect any liability. If the Company were to be found liable for an infringement, it might have a material adverse effect on its operating results and cash flow in the period incurred.

(10)

Merger Agreement

On January 26, 2004, Cole National Corporation and Luxottica Group S.p.A. entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which the Parent would become a subsidiary of Luxottica Group. Under the agreement, Luxottica Group will acquire all of the

F-27

outstanding shares of the Parent for a cash purchase price of $22.50 per share, together with the purchase of all outstanding options and similar equity rights at the same price per share, less their respective exercise price. The merger is subject to approval by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Parent’s common stock and the satisfaction of other customary conditions, including compliance with applicable antitrust clearance requirements. On February 27, 2004, the Parent and Luxottica Group filed pre-merger notifications with the U.S. antitrust authorities pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“the HSR Act”). On March 30, 2004 the Parent and Luxottica Group jointly announced that they had received a request from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for additional information and documentary material with respect to the Merger. Accordingly, the waiting period under the HSR Act has been extended until the 30th day after the date of substantial compliance with the request by both parties, unless earlier terminated by the FTC. On March 2, 2004, the Parent announced that it has scheduled a special meeting of stockholders for April 20, 2004 to consider and vote on the approval of the merger agreement with Luxottica Group. Stockholders of record of the Parent as of March 12, 2004 will be entitled to vote on the transaction. On March 15, 2004, the Parent filed its definitive proxy statement.

F-28

Schedule I

COLE NATIONAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

Cole National Group, Inc.
Condensed Balance Sheets
January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003
(Dollars in millions)


	2003			2002
Assets:
Cash	$	43.5		$	28.4
Investment in subsidiaries		291.4			313.8
Property and equipment, net		2.6			4.4
Deferred income tax and other		26.3			23.6

Total assets	$	363.8		$	370.2

Liabilities and stockholder’s equity:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		25.6			21.1
Payable to affiliates		50.0			52.5
Long-term debt		275.5			275.8
Other long-term liabilities		21.9			26.2
Stockholder’s equity (deficit)		(9.2	)		(5.4	)

Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	363.8		$	370.2

F-29

Schedule I
(Continued)

Cole National Group, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Operations and Cash Flows
52 Weeks Ended January 31, 2004, February 1, 2003 and
February 2, 2002
(Dollars in millions)


	January 31,			February 1,			February 2,
Condensed Statements of Operations	2004			2003			2002
Revenue — services to affiliates	$	45.8		$	32.9		$	29.7
Operating expenses		47.2			35.7			29.2
Interest and other (income) expenses, net		(7.8	)		3.2			(8.1	)

Income (loss) before taxes		6.4			(6.0	)		8.6
Income tax provision (benefit)		(8.8	)		(12.6	)		(17.6	)

Income (loss) before equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries		15.2			6.6			26.2
Equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries		(23.0	)		(13.9	)		(26.7	)

Net income (loss)	$	(7.8	)	$	(7.3	)	$	(0.5	)

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities	$	14.2		$	29.0		$	28.0

Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(0.5	)		(0.5	)		(3.4	)
Proceeds from sale of asset		2.6			—			—
Systems development costs		—			(1.0	)		(1.0	)
Other, net		—			(0.2	)		0.1

Net cash used for investing activities		2.1			(1.7	)		(4.3	)

Financing activities:
Repayment of long-term debt		—			(158.1	)		(0.1	)
Advances from (to) affiliates		(2.4	)		(35.7	)		2.4
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			150.0			—
Payment of financing fees		(0.2	)		(6.1	)		—
Other, net		1.4			0.7			(2.0	)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		(1.2	)		(49.2	)		0.3

Net change in cash		15.1			(21.9	)		24.0
Cash, beginning of period		28.4			50.3			26.3

Cash, end of period	$	43.5		$	28.4		$	50.3

F-30

Schedule I
(Continued)

Note to Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

The accompanying financial information of Cole National Group, Inc. is as of January 31, 2004 and February 1, 2003, and for the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2004, February 1, 2003 and February 2, 2002. Cole National Group, Inc. is a holding company for its wholly owned subsidiaries, Things Remembered, Inc., Cole Vision Corporation and Pearle, Inc., except for expenses associated with Cole National Group’s corporate offices, consisted of no other operations.

This financial information should be read in connection with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto of Cole National Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries, contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

F-31

Schedule II

Cole National Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
52 Weeks Ended January 31, 2004, February 1, 2003
and February 2, 2002
(Dollars in millions)


			Charges
	Balance at		(Reversals)									Balance
	Beginning		to Cost and									End of
Description	of Period		Expenses			Transfers(B)			Deductions(A)			Period
January 31, 2004
Allowance for uncollectible accounts	$	3.1	$	2.2		$	—		$	(1.9	)	$	3.4
Franchise note allowance for uncollectible accounts		3.0		—			—			(0.1	)	$	2.9
February 1, 2003
Allowance for uncollectible accounts	$	3.2	$	2.0		$	—		$	(2.1	)	$	3.1
Franchise note allowance for uncollectible accounts		5.2		(0.7	)		—			(1.5	)	$	3.0
February 2, 2002
Allowance for uncollectible accounts	$	6.3	$	1.1		$	(1.2	)	$	(3.0	)	$	3.2
Franchise note allowance for uncollectible accounts		4.7		0.3			1.2			(1.0	)	$	5.2

(A)		Receivable balances written off, net of recoveries

(B)		Transfers resulted from conversions of accounts receivables to notes receivables.

		Allowance balances presented in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are represented on this schedule.

F-32

CNG EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1(i)		Certificate of Incorporation of Cole National Group, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).

3.2(ii)		Amended and Restated By-Laws of Cole National Group, dated July 28, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2(ii) to Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for period ended August 2, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

4.1		Indenture dated May 22, 2002, by and among Cole National Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 8-7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 (the form of which Senior Subordinated Note is included in such Indenture), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 3, 2002 (File No. 33-66342).

4.2		Indenture dated August 22, 1997, between Cole National Group, Inc. and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 8-5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Cole National Group, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-34963).

10.1		Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors of Cole National Group, incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).

10.2		Form of Indemnification Agreement for Officers of Cole National Group, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).

10.3		Agreement for the Allocation of Federal Income Tax Liability and Benefits among Members of the Parent Group dated August 23, 1985, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Cole National Group’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-66342).

10.4		Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as of September 30, 1993 between Cole National Corporation and Cole National Group, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 3, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).

10.5		Cole National Group Guarantee and Cash Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 15, 1996, by Cole National Group and Cole National Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Cole National Corporation’s Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 2, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).

10.6		Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of November 15, 1996, by Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc., Cole Gift Centers, Inc., Pearle, Inc. and Pearle Service Corporation and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Cole National Corporation’s Report on Form 8-K, field on December 2, 1996 (File No. 1-12814).

10.7*		Cole National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan dated as of December 17, 1998, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814)

10.8*		Cole National Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan effective as of February 1, 1999, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814).

X-1


Exhibit
Number		Description
10.9*		Amendment No. 1, dated as of December 17, 1998, to the Cole National Group, Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 to Cole National Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12814).

10.10*		Amendment No. 1 to the Cole National Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Executives and other Senior Management, dated January 25, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Cole National Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2, 2002 (File No. 33-66342).

10.11*		Amendment No. 2 to the Cole National Group, Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan, dated January 25, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Cole National Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2, 2002 (File No. 33-66342).

10.12*		Amendment No. 2 to the Cole National Group, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, dated January 25, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Cole National Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2, 2002 (File No. 33-66342).

10.13*		Amendment No. 1 to the Cole National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, dated January 5, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Cole National Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended February 2, 2002 (File No. 33-66342).

10.14		Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2002, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc., Cole Gift Centers, Inc., Pearle, Inc. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 4, 2002 (File No. 33-66342).

10.15		Amendment No. 1 to the Cole National Group, Inc. Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2001), effective March 31, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2002 (File No. 33-66342).

10.16		Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated December 16, 2002, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc. and Pearle, Inc. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.17		Amended and Restated Instrument Designating Participants of the Cole National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan dated January 25, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.18		Form of License/Lease Agreement for Sears Optical, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.19		Bank Waiver to the Credit Agreement, dated May 9, 2003, among Cole Vision Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc. and Pearle, Inc. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.20*		Employment Agreement entered into as of June 2, 2003 by and among Cole National Corporation and Larry Pollock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cole National Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the period ended May 3, 2003 (File No. 1-12814).

X-2


Exhibit
Number		Description
10.21*		Amended, restated and extended Credit Agreement, dated June 27, 2003, among Cole Vision, Things Remembered and Pearle, Inc. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.22		Separation Agreement entered into as of July 16, 2003 by and among Cole National Corporation and Jeffrey A. Cole, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cole National Group Inc. ‘s Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 (File No. 1-12814).

10.23*		Assignment of Life Insurance Policy, Termination of Split-Dollar Agreement and Satisfaction of Collateral Assignment by and among Cole National Corporation and Jeffrey A. Cole, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.24*		Employment Agreement dated September 3, 2003 between Cole National Corporation and Lawrence E. Hyatt, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.25*		Employment Agreement dated September 3, 2003 between Cole National Corporation and Leslie D. Dunn, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.26*		Employment Agreement dated September 3, 2003 between Cole National Corporation and Patricia M. Luzier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.27*		Multi-Year Performance Incentive Bonus Addendum between Cole National Corporation and Larry Pollock, dated November 26, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.28		Letter of Credit Reimbursement and Security agreement among Cole National Corporation, Things Remembered, Inc. and Key Bank National Association, dated November 3, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.29*		Addendum to Letter Agreement dated May 15, 2000 between Cole National Corporation and Ann M. Holt, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.30*		Addendum to Letter Agreement dated March 27, 1993 between Cole National Corporation and Joseph Gaglioti, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 (File No. 33-66342).

10.31*†		Amendment No. 2 to the Cole National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan, dated January 23, 2004.

10.32*†		Instrument Designating Participant of the Cole National Group, Inc. 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan dated January 23, 2004 between Cole National Corporation and Larry Pollock.

24†		Power of Attorney.

X-3


Exhibit
Number		Description
31.1†		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

31.2†		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

32#†		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

99.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger among Cole National Corporation, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Colorado Acquisition Corp., dated January 23, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2004 (File No. 33-66342).

99.2		Amendment No. 1, dated January 23 2004, to 199 Rights Agreement, dated November 22, 1999, between Cole National Corporation and National City Bank, as Rights Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Cole National Group Inc.’s Form 8-K filed on January 27, 2004 (File No. 33-66342).

*		Reflects management contract or other compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 14(c) of this Form 10-K.

#		In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K, this exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

†		Filed herewith.

X-4

Filing Compare · COLE NATIONAL GROUP INC