Filing Compare · ARGO TECH CORP

InTable connectionof with new aerospace product development programs, we incur significant research and development expenditures to design, test and qualify main engine fuel pumps and accessories for engine and airframe OEMs. Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred, and such expenses are expected to continue at historical levels. Research and development expense was $9.5 million, $11.7 million and $10.3 million for the fiscal years ended October 25, 2003, October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001, respectively. Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

~~WASHINGTON~~Washington, ~~D.C.~~DC 20549

FORM 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2004
		For the Fiscal Year Ended October 25, 2003, or
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from to

Commission ~~File~~file Nono. 333-38223

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION

(Exact ~~Name~~name of ~~Registrant~~registrant as ~~Specified~~specified in ~~Its~~its ~~Charter~~charter)

Delaware		31-1521125
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
23555 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio		44117
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

~~Registrant’s~~23555 ~~Telephone~~Euclid ~~Number~~Avenue, ~~Including Area~~Cleveland, ~~Code:~~Ohio ~~(216) 692-6000~~44117

~~Securities~~(Address ~~Registered~~of ~~Pursuant~~principal toexecutive ~~Section~~offices ~~12(b)~~— ofzip ~~The Act: None~~code)

~~Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12~~(g216) ~~of The Act: None~~ 692-6000

~~Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant:~~ (~~1) has~~Registrant’s ~~filed~~telephone ~~all~~number, ~~reports to be filed by Section 13 or~~including ~~15(d)~~area ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports~~code) ~~and (2) has~~ ~~been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o~~

~~Indicate~~Securities byregistered ~~checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers~~ pursuant to Section 12(b) ~~Item 405~~ of ~~Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to~~ the ~~best of~~Act: ~~registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information~~ ~~statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual~~ ~~Report on Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ~~

~~Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is~~None ~~an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the~~ ~~Exchange Act). Yes o No þ~~

AsSecurities ofregistered ~~January 15,~~pursuant ~~2004, one share of the~~to ~~Registrant’s~~Section 12(g) ~~Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, was outstanding. All~~ of the ~~outstanding capital stock of the~~Act: ~~registrant is held by AT Holdings Corporation, the parent~~ ~~company of the registrant.~~

~~Documents incorporated by reference:~~ None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ

No established published trading market exists for the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of January 15, 2005, 1 share of the registrant’s common stock was outstanding, and is held by AT Holdings Corporation.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT

ON FORM 10-K

Table of Contents


		Page

PART I:
Item 1.	Business		2
Item 2.	Properties		8
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		8
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		8

PART II:
Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity; Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		9
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		9
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		12
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		27
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		28
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		28
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		28

PART III:
Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant		29
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		30
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		36
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		37

PART IV:
Item 15.	Exhibits; Financial Statement Schedules		40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION
PART I
Item 1. Business.	~~Item 1. Business.~~
Item 2. Properties.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
PART II
	Item 5. Market for Our Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity; Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.	~~Item 6. Selected Financial Data.~~
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits; Financial Statements Schedules.
SIGNATURES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
	CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME
	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY)
	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit 12 Computation of Ratios
Exhibit 12.1 Statement Re Computation of Ratios
CEO 302 CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT 31.1
Exhibit 31.1 302 Certification
CFO 302 CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT 31.2
Exhibit 31.2 302 Certification
906 CERTIFICATIONS EXHIBIT 32
Exhibit 32 906 Certification

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION

PART I


Item 1.	Business.

WeArgo-Tech ~~design~~Corporation, ~~manufacture~~a Delaware corporation (“we”, ~~sell~~“us” ~~and~~or ~~service~~“Argo-Tech”), ~~high~~was ~~performance~~formed ~~fuel~~in ~~flow~~1986 ~~devices~~to ~~and~~acquire ~~systems~~the ~~for~~Power ~~both~~Accessories ~~aerospace~~Division ~~and general~~of ~~industrial applications~~TRW. Today, ~~Argo-Tech~~we ~~operates~~are ina ~~two business~~global ~~segments~~designer, ~~Aerospace~~manufacturer and ~~Industrial.~~servicer ~~The Aerospace~~of ~~segment~~high ~~includes~~performance ~~the~~fuel ~~design,~~flow ~~manufacture,~~devices ~~distribution,~~and ~~repair~~systems. We operate in ~~and~~two ~~overhaul~~business ofsegments, ~~aviation~~Aerospace ~~products~~and ~~throughout~~Industrial. ~~the~~The ~~world~~Aerospace ~~consisting~~segment consists of aircraft engine fuel pumps, ~~fuel~~and ~~flow~~other ~~related~~engine products, commercial and military products and systems found on a plane’s airframe, and aerial refueling pumps and related equipment. The Industrial segment includes ~~the~~ground ~~design~~fueling nozzles, ~~manufacture~~hoses and ~~distribution~~other ~~of industrial pumps,~~ ground fueling ~~valves~~components, ~~and~~an ~~related~~automated fuel ~~components~~management system, cryogenic pumps and nozzles ~~for transferring liquefied natural gas~~ and the operation of a business park in Cleveland, Ohio. ~~Argo-Tech~~ ~~is a Delaware corporation formed in 1986.~~ Financial information by business segment can be found in Note 13 to ~~the~~ the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

InOur ~~the~~principal ~~Aerospace~~executive ~~segment,~~offices we are ~~the~~located ~~world’s~~at ~~leading~~23555 Euclid ~~supplier~~Avenue, ofCleveland, ~~main~~Ohio 44117, ~~engine fuel pumps to the commercial aircraft industry~~ and ~~a leading supplier of military main engine~~our ~~fuel~~telephone ~~pumps~~number ~~and~~is ~~commercial and military airframe products and systems, including airframe pumps, valves and accessories~~(216) 692-6000. We ~~are~~ ~~the~~also ~~world’s~~maintain ~~leading supplier of military aerial~~a ~~refueling~~website ~~pumps~~at ~~and related equipment~~www.argo-tech.com. ~~Our~~However, ~~Aerospace~~information ~~customers include~~on ~~substantially all commercial and domestic military~~our ~~engine~~website ~~and~~is ~~airframe~~not ~~manufacturers,~~a ~~airlines~~part ~~worldwide~~of ~~and~~this ~~the U~~report.~~S. and certain foreign militaries.~~

InAerospace ~~the Industrial~~ segment~~, we are the~~ ~~world’s leading supplier of ground fueling components and a~~ fuel management system used at airports throughout the world, and a leading supplier of cryogenic pumps and nozzles and specialty industrial hose for aerospace, chemical transfer and marine applications. In addition, we supply industrial and marine gas turbine products. We also operate an aerospace certified materials laboratory and a business park in Cleveland, Ohio, where we maintain our headquarters and primary production facilities.

We are the world’s leading supplier of main engine fuel pumps to the commercial aircraft industry and a leading supplier of main engine fuel pumps to the military. We are also a leading supplier of commercial and military airframe products and systems, which are used to transfer fuel to an engine and control fuel between tanks. In addition, we are a leading global supplier of military aerial refueling pumps and related equipment.

During the long life cycle of aircraft containing our products, we earn significant aftermarket revenue from repair and overhaul sales. On average, a commercial aircraft will experience five to six main engine fuel pump overhauls over its 30-year life span.

Industrial segment

We are the leading supplier of ground fueling components and automated fuel management systems, which are used at airports throughout the world. In addition, we design and supply in-tank pumps and nozzles for liquid natural gas (“LNG”), liquid propane gas and other cryogenic fluids, as well as specialty military and industrial hose for aerospace, chemical transfer and marine applications. We also supply products to the industrial gas turbine industry.

We operate an aerospace certified materials laboratory and a business park in Cleveland, Ohio, where we maintain our headquarters and primary production facilities.

Products

Aerospace

Main ~~Engine~~engine ~~Fuel~~fuel ~~Pumps~~pumps. Main engine fuel pumps are precision mechanical pumps, mounted to the aircraft’s engines, that maintain the flow of fuel to the engine at a precise rate and pressure. These pumps consist of an aluminum body which is cast by certified subcontractors. We then machine the casting, manufacture a variety of other components, assemble the final product, and perform rigorous testing at our Cleveland facility.

Our main engine fuel pumps are used across the full spectrum of commercial engine designs. We are the sole source supplier of main engine fuel pumps for all CFM56 series engines, ~~one of~~ the most popular series of large commercial aircraft engines used today. ~~The CFM56~~and ~~series~~for ~~engines~~the ~~power~~Boeing 777 ~~the~~aircraft. ~~Airbus~~Our products ~~A-318,~~also ~~A-319,~~include ~~A-320,~~large ~~A-321~~ regional and ~~A-340~~business ~~and~~jet applications, including the ~~Boeing~~main ~~737~~engine ~~aircraft.~~fuel Wepumps ~~are~~used ~~also~~on ~~the sole~~all ~~source~~regional ~~supplier~~jets ofmanufactured ~~main~~by ~~engine~~Bombardier ~~fuel~~and ~~pumps~~Embraer having seating capacity for ~~all~~at ~~engines~~least ~~used~~70 passengers. These jets oninclude the ~~Boeing~~high-end ~~777~~Bombardier ~~aircraft~~Global Express, ~~including~~ the ~~new~~Gulfstream Aerospace ~~longer~~Corp. ~~range Boeing~~V ~~777~~aircraft and the Boeing 717. We supply main

2 ~~Our products also include large regional and~~ ~~business jet applications, including the main engine fuel pumps~~ ~~used on the BR700 series engine, which is used on the high-end~~ Bombardier Global Express, the Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. V aircraft and the Boeing 717. We supply main engine fuel pumps for the GE CF34-8 engine, which is used on the Bombardier CRJ700 and CRJ900 regional and business aircraft and the Embraer ERJ-170 70 passenger regional jet. We also supply main engine fuel pumps for the GE CF34-10 engine which is used on the Embraer ERJ-190 and the new ARJ 21 regional jet to be manufactured by AVIC I Commercial Aircraft Co. Ltd. (ACAC) in China.

Airframe Products. Fuel pumps and other airframe fuel transfer control systems in the airframe are necessary to transfer fuel to the engine systems and to maintain aircraft balance by shifting fuel between tanks. We design and manufacture complete fuel systems and fuel subsystems such as refuel/defuel, engine feed and fuel level control. We also design and manufacture a wide variety of fuel components consisting of boost and transfer fuel pumps, fuel flow proportioners, and airframe valves, adapters, nozzles and caps. These systems and components are used for fueling, storing, transferring and engine feed functions during ground and flight operations. Argo-Tech is the fuel system supplier for the Eclipse 500, a new generation of business jet manufactured by Eclipse Aviation Corporation.

~~Aerial~~engine ~~Refueling Systems.~~fuel ~~Aerial~~pumps ~~refueling~~for ~~systems~~the GE CF34-8 engine, ~~permit~~which ~~military~~is ~~aerial~~used ~~tankers~~on tothe ~~refuel~~Bombardier ~~fighter,~~CRJ700 ~~bomber~~and CRJ900 regional and ~~other~~business ~~military~~ aircraft ~~while~~and inthe ~~flight.~~Embraer WeERJ-170, ~~are~~ a ~~major supplier~~70 passenger ofregional ~~components~~jet. ~~for~~We ~~aerial~~also ~~refueling~~supply ~~systems,~~main ~~which~~engine ~~are~~fuel ~~produced only~~pumps for ~~military~~the ~~applications.~~GE CF34-10 ~~Aerial~~engine ~~refueling~~which ~~components~~is ~~we manufacture,~~used ~~including~~on ~~pumps,~~the ~~hose~~Embraer ERJ-190 and ~~couplers,~~the ~~are installed~~new inARJ ~~the~~21 regional ~~refueling~~jet ~~systems~~to ofbe ~~100%~~manufactured ofby ~~U.S. designed military~~AVIC I ~~aircraft~~Commercial ~~equipped~~Aircraft ~~with~~Co. Ltd. ~~such~~in ~~capability~~China.

Airframe products. Fuel pumps and other airframe fuel transfer control systems in the airframe are necessary to transfer fuel to the engine systems and to maintain aircraft balance by shifting fuel between tanks. We design and manufacture complete fuel systems and fuel subsystems such as refuel/ defuel, engine feed and fuel level control. We also design and manufacture a wide variety of fuel components consisting of boost and transfer fuel pumps, fuel flow proportioners and airframe valves, adapters, nozzles and caps. These systems and components are used for fueling, storing, transferring and engine feed functions during ground and flight operations. Argo-Tech is the fuel system supplier for the Eclipse 500, a new generation of business jet manufactured by Eclipse Aviation Corporation, as well as for the Adam A700, the Javelin and the Northrop-Grumman X47 Joint Unmanned Combat Aircraft System.

Aerial refueling systems. Aerial refueling systems permit military aerial tankers to refuel fighter, bomber and other military aircraft while in flight. We are a major supplier of components for aerial refueling systems, which are produced only for military applications. Aerial refueling components we manufacture, including pumps, hose and couplers, are installed in the refueling systems of 100% of U.S. designed military aircraft equipped with aerial refueling capability.

Aftermarket sales. Aftermarket sales comprise the largest component of our aerospace business, and consist primarily of spare parts sales and overhaul, retrofit, repair and technical support to commercial and military customers worldwide.


	Industrial

Ground ~~Fueling~~fueling ~~Products~~products. Ground fueling systems are used to transfer fuel from underground fuel tanks and ground fueling trucks to the fuel receptacle of the aircraft. We manufacture various ground fueling hydrants, couplers and nozzles for commercial and military airports around the world, as well as specialty industrial hose. We also manufacture digital pressure control valves. These valves incorporate a microprocessor to enhance fuel flow control and allow for accurate measurement of pressure at the delivery receptacle thereby optimizing the fuel flow and pressure.

We also sell fuel management systems., including the Argo-Tech -developed ~~the~~ AVR2000 Aviation Refueling Management System, which is used at ~~over~~nearly 200 sites worldwide. It is the leading hardware and software system for customized fuel utilization management, data collection and billing in the industry.

Cryogenic ~~Products~~products. We ~~have~~design ~~been widely recognized as a leading designer~~ and ~~supplier~~ ofsupply high performance submerged motor pumps for ~~cryogenic~~ cryogenic gases and fluids. We ~~recently~~have also introduced ~~liquefied~~LNG ~~natural gas~~ nozzles and receptacles for use on alternative fuel vehicles. We ~~believe~~ believe these products position us favorably in this emerging market.

Industrial ~~Gas~~gas ~~Turbine~~turbine ~~Products~~products. As a result of our established record of performance with our Aerospace engine products, we have gained entry into the Industrial & ~~Marine~~ Marine Gas Turbine, (or “IMGT,”) market. Our current IMGT products include designed to specification lubrication and ~~scavenge~~ scavenge pumps, liquid fuel delivery pumps, and precision liquid ~~fuel~~ fuel flow dividers. We offer complete aftermarket support for ~~these~~ these products, including technical support, supply of spare parts, product repair and overhaul, and on-site service.

Aftermarket Sales

Aftermarket sales comprise the largest component of our business. Aftermarket sales consist primarily of spare parts sales and overhaul, retrofit, repair and technical support to commercial and military customers worldwide.

Customers


	Aerospace

Original Equipment Manufacturer (referred to as “OEM” in this report) customers for our aerospace products include the world’s major aircraft engine manufacturers: General Electric, Honeywell, Pratt ~~and~~ & Whitney (including Pratt & ~~and~~ Whitney Canada), Rolls-Royce (including Rolls-Royce Allison and Rolls-Royce Deutschland), SNECMA and Williams International Corp. Customers for our airframe pumps and valves include Airbus, Boeing, Cessna, Gulfstream, Lockheed Martin, ~~Raytheon and~~Northrop ~~various U.S. government agencies. Orders for military components also come through customers such as Lockheed Martin~~Grumman, ~~Boeing,~~ ~~General~~Raytheon ~~Electric~~ and ~~Pratt and Whitney. Our aftermarket~~ ~~customers~~various ~~include all major aircraft and engine repair facilities and all major airlines worldwide~~U. ~~Currently, the total number of airline and third party customers for our spare parts, overhaul and repair exceeds 200~~S. ~~Upsilon International Corporation, in its capacity as distributor of certain of our products to foreign customers, accounted for approximately 12% of our net revenues for the fiscal year ended October~~ ~~25,~~government ~~2003. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our~~ ~~revenues during this period.~~

Industrial

Most commercial ground fueling products are sold to customers through independent distributors, while military ground fueling products are usually sold directly to the government. Customers in the domestic markets

include a variety of airlines, airports and various fixed base operators. In international markets, our ground fueling products are purchased by several oil companies, including several state-run oil companies and airport authorities.

Our cryogenic pump customer base includes shipping vessels operated by domestic and foreign carriers, liquefied gas ship loading terminal owners, liquefied gas receiving terminals, petrochemical plants, large architectural and engineering companies worldwide, electric power generation companies and alternate fuel vehicle fleet operators.

Our industrial gas turbine products are utilized in three market sectors: power generation, mechanical drive and marine. Major customers for these products include Rolls Royce Power Engineering, Rolls Royce Energy Systems, Siemens Westinghouse Power Systems and Pratt and Whitney Power Systems.

Sales and Marketing

OEM customers in both the Aerospace and Industrial segments select suppliers primarily on the basis of custom design capabilities, product quality and performance, prompt delivery, price and aftermarket support. We believe that we meet these requirements in a timely, responsive manner which has resulted in an extensive installed base of components and substantial aftermarket revenues.

We market and sell our OEM and aftermarket products through a combination of direct marketing, internal sales personnel, independent manufacturing representatives and U.S. and international distributors. We supply main engine fuel pump spare parts directly to domestic airlines and third-party overhaul shops, while foreign customers that purchase main engine fuel pump products receive their spare parts through Upsilon International, which operates a distribution facility in Torrance, California.

Suppliers and Raw Materials

We use a certified supplier program that demands a commitment to 100% quality and on-time deliveries. Supplier performance is measured by our comprehensive supplier rating system. Currently, our supplier base includes approximately 600 companies.

Our largest supplier expenditure relates to outsourcing of component machining. We have derived significant savings by taking advantage of advances in machining technologies and by coordinating engineering with our suppliers. Agreements are in place with our key long term suppliers who provide most of the outside supplier component machining.

Aluminum castings used in the manufacture of main engine fuel pumps are the highest volume raw material supplied to us. Key long term certified suppliers provide the majority of these castings. We also buy quantities of steel bar stock to produce gears and shafts from multiple producers. However, CPM-10V, a powdered metal essential for the manufacture of certain of our main engine fuel pumps, is a proprietary product available only from Crucible Specialty Metals. We do not have a contractual arrangement with Crucible Specialty Metals; we purchase CPM-10V pursuant to standard purchase orders. Another material has been identified as an alternative to CPM-10V, but that material has not yet been certified by our customers.

Manufacturing, Repair and Overhaul

Argo-Tech has five manufacturing and repair and overhaul facilities:

• A 150 acre business park in Cleveland, Ohio • A 9.2 acre facility in Costa Mesa, California • An 85,000 square foot facility in Tucson, Arizona • A 6,000 square foot facility in Inglewood, California • A 3,500 square foot facility in Henley-on-Thames, England

In the Aerospace segment, main engine fuel pumps and some models of our airframe fuel pumps are manufactured, repaired and overhauled at our Cleveland, Ohio facility. The remaining Aerospace segment

~~products~~agencies. ~~are~~Orders ~~manufactured,~~for ~~repaired~~military components can be directly received from government entities and through customers ~~overhauled~~such inas ~~our~~Boeing, ~~Costa~~General ~~Mesa~~Electric, ~~facility~~Lockheed Martin and Pratt & Whitney. ~~The~~Our ~~Inglewood~~aftermarket customers include all major aircraft and engine repair facilities and all major airlines. Currently, ~~California~~the total number of airline and third party ~~facility~~customers isfor ~~exclusively~~our anspare parts, overhaul and repair ~~shop~~exceeds 200. Upsilon International Corporation and two other related entities, as distributors of certain of our products to foreign customers, accounted for approximately 12% of our ~~main~~net revenues ~~engine~~for ~~fuel~~the ~~pump~~fiscal ~~products~~year ended October 30, 2004. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Distribution agreements.” No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues during this period.

~~In the~~ Industrial segment, all products are manufactured in the Costa Mesa facility with three exceptions: first, industrial hose products which are manufactured in our Tucson facility; second, the airport fuel management system which is produced at our Henley-on-Thames, England facility; and, third, industrial and marine gas turbine products which are manufactured at our Cleveland facility. Repair and overhaul of Industrial segment products is conducted in our Cleveland and Costa Mesa facilities.

Most ofcommercial ~~the~~ground fueling products ~~at our Cleveland facility~~ are ~~manufactured internally. This facility houses our senior~~sold ~~management~~to ~~and~~customers ~~the~~through ~~majority~~independent ofdistributors, ~~our~~while ~~Aerospace engineering and~~military ~~design~~ground ~~staff,~~fueling ~~sales~~products ~~team,~~are ~~and~~usually ~~production~~sold ~~and~~directly ~~main~~to ~~distribution~~the ~~facilities~~government. ~~This~~Customers ~~facility~~in isthe ~~organized~~domestic ~~around~~markets ~~manufacturing “cells”~~include ~~that~~a ~~produce~~variety of ~~bearings~~airlines, ~~gears,~~airports ~~housings~~ and ~~shafts~~ ~~for~~various ~~assembly.~~fixed Bybase ~~creating~~operators. ~~cells,~~In international ~~the necessary people~~markets, ~~machinery,~~ ~~materials~~our ~~and~~ground ~~methods~~fueling ~~are focused on distinct~~ products ~~and~~are ~~processes. Each manufacturing cell includes members~~purchased ~~from~~by ~~each~~several ofoil ~~the Manufacturing~~companies, ~~Quality,~~including ~~Production Control~~ExxonMobil, ~~Statistical~~ ~~Process~~Royal ~~Control, and Manufacturing Engineering~~Dutch ~~disciplines.~~Shell ~~Our design engineering staff is also organized into cells which correspond to~~ and ~~complement~~several ~~the~~state-run ~~manufacturing cells.~~oil ~~The~~companies ~~manufacturing~~ and ~~engineering cells work together to~~airport ~~meet our integrated operating plan and to ensure timely design and production of our products~~authorities.

InOur ~~contrast~~cryogenic topump ~~our~~customer ~~substantial~~base ~~reliance on~~includes ~~internal~~shipping ~~manufacturing~~vessels ofoperated ~~products~~by indomestic ~~Cleveland, we outsource most of the machining~~ and ~~pre-assembly~~foreign ~~production of products in~~carriers, ~~Costa~~liquefied ~~Mesa~~gas toship ~~external~~loading ~~providers.~~terminal ~~However~~owners, weliquefied ~~do maintain~~gas ~~internal~~receiving ~~equipment capacity at our Costa Mesa facility~~terminals, ~~which enables~~petrochemical ~~us to produce small quantity~~plants, ~~quick~~Samsung ~~turn~~and ~~components to~~other ~~reduce~~large ~~setup/breakdown~~architectural ~~times on smaller jobs~~ and ~~for~~engineering ~~the manufacturing~~companies ~~control of key parts. We have lowered the cost of~~worldwide, ~~products~~electric ~~manufactured~~power ingeneration ~~Costa~~companies ~~Mesa by outsourcing capital intensive tasks such as casting~~ and ~~machining,~~alternate ~~while~~fuel ~~completing~~vehicle ~~final~~fleet ~~assembly and testing on the premises~~operators.

~~All~~Our ~~of the~~ industrial ~~hose~~gas turbine products ~~manufactured~~are utilized atin ~~our~~three ~~Tucson~~market ~~facility~~sectors: ~~are~~power ~~processed~~generation, ~~internally.~~mechanical ~~The~~drive ~~software~~and ~~relating~~marine. toMajor ~~the~~customers ~~ground~~for ~~fueling~~these ~~airport~~products ~~fuel~~include ~~management~~Rolls ~~system is~~Royce ~~written~~Energy ~~internally~~Systems, atRolls ~~our~~Royce ~~Henley-on-Thames~~Power ~~facility~~Engineering, ~~while the~~Siemens ~~hardware~~Westinghouse ~~relating~~and ~~to the system is sourced from a third party~~Statoil.

InSales ~~addition to our manufacturing facilities, we maintain sophisticated testing facilities at our Ohio~~ and ~~California~~ ~~locations. These testing facilities allow for~~marketing ~~simulation of typical conditions and stresses that will be~~ experienced by our products during use. Our products are also thoroughly tested for design compliance, performance and durability. To facilitate quality control and product development, we maintain a sophisticated chemistry and metallurgy laboratory at our Cleveland facility.

WeOEM ~~have~~customers ~~obtained~~in both the Aerospace and Industrial ~~preserved~~segments ~~our~~select ~~quality~~suppliers primarily on the basis of ~~management~~custom ~~system~~design ~~certifications.~~capabilities, ~~ISO-9001:2000~~product quality and ~~AS 9100~~performance, ~~Revision~~prompt Adelivery, ~~certifications~~price ~~are~~and ~~recognized~~aftermarket bysupport. ~~most~~We ofbelieve ~~our~~that ~~customers~~we meet these requirements in a timely, asresponsive ~~well~~manner aswhich has byresulted ~~the~~in ~~FAA~~an ~~and~~extensive ~~U.S.~~installed ~~government~~base ~~supply~~of components and ~~organizations~~substantial aftermarket revenues.

~~Patents~~We market and ~~Trademarks~~sell our OEM and aftermarket products through a combination of direct marketing, internal sales personnel, independent manufacturing representatives and U.S. and international distributors. We supply main engine fuel pump spare parts directly to domestic airlines and third-party overhaul shops, while foreign customers that purchase main engine fuel pump products receive their spare parts through Upsilon International Corporation, which operates a distribution facility in Torrance, California.

WeFor ~~have~~the afiscal ~~number~~years ofended ~~patents~~October 30, ~~and~~2004, October 25, ~~trademarks~~2003 and ~~pending~~ ~~patent~~October 26, ~~applications~~2002, ~~related~~customer revenues tofrom ~~our products. While in~~ the ~~aggregate~~United ~~our~~States ~~patents~~were ~~and trademarks are of material~~$107.1 million, ~~importance~~$94.0 million toand ~~our~~$86.7 million, ~~business~~respectively, ~~we believe no single patent or~~and ~~trademark~~foreign orcustomer ~~group~~revenues ofwere ~~patents or trademarks is of material~~$80.2 million, ~~importance~~$66.7 million toand ~~our~~$68.6 million, ~~business as a whole~~respectively.

~~Government~~Suppliers ~~Regulations~~and raw materials

~~The~~We ~~commercial~~use ~~aerospace~~a ~~industry~~certified issupplier ~~highly regulated~~program bythat ~~the Federal Aviation Administration~~demands ~~(“FAA”)~~a incommitment ~~the~~to ~~United~~100% ~~States,~~quality ~~the Joint Aviation Authorities in Europe~~ and ~~the Civil Aviation Authority in England, while the military aerospace industry is governed by military quality (MIL or ISO~~on-~~9000)~~time ~~specifications~~deliveries. ~~We are~~Supplier ~~required~~performance tois bemeasured ~~certified~~ by ~~one or more of these entities, and, in some cases, by individual OEMs, in order to engineer and service parts and components used in specific aircraft models. We must also satisfy the requirements of~~ our ~~customers, including~~comprehensive ~~OEMs~~supplier ~~and airlines, that are subject to FAA~~rating ~~regulations, and provide these customers with products that comply with the government regulations applicable to commercial flight operations~~system. ~~In addition~~Currently, ~~the~~our ~~FAA~~supplier ~~requires~~base ~~that~~includes ~~various~~approximately ~~maintenance routines be performed on aircraft components~~800 companies. We ~~currently satisfy or~~

Our largest supplier expenditure relates to outsourcing of component machining. We have derived significant savings by taking advantage of advances in machining technologies and by coordinating engineering with our suppliers. Agreements are in place with our key long term suppliers that provide most of the outside supplier component machining.

~~exceed~~essential ~~these~~for ~~maintenance~~the ~~standards~~manufacture inof certain of our main ~~repair~~engine fuel pumps, is a proprietary product available only ~~and~~from ~~overhaul~~Crucible ~~activities~~Specialty Metals. We ~~maintain~~do ~~FAA~~not have a contractual arrangement with Crucible Specialty Metals; we purchase CPM-~~approved~~10V pursuant ~~repair~~to standard purchase orders. Another material has been ~~stations~~identified atas ~~our~~an ~~Cleveland,~~alternative ~~Ohio~~to CPM-10V, ~~Costa~~but ~~Mesa,~~that ~~California~~material ~~and~~has ~~Inglewood,~~not ~~California~~yet ~~facilities~~been certified by our customers.

Our aviation and metals operations are also subject to a variety of worker and community safety laws. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (“OSHA”) mandates general requirements for safe workplaces for all employees. In additionManufacturing, ~~OSHA~~repair ~~provides special procedures~~ and ~~measures~~ ~~for the handling of certain hazardous and toxic~~overhaul ~~substances. We believe that our operations are in material~~ ~~compliance with OSHA’s health and safety requirements.~~

Argo-Tech has a total of five manufacturing, repair and overhaul facilities:


	•	a 150-acre business park in Cleveland, Ohio;

	•	a 9.2-acre facility in Costa Mesa, California;

	•	an 85,000 square-foot facility in Tucson, Arizona;

	•	a 6,000 square-foot facility in Inglewood, California; and

	•	a 3,500 square-foot facility in Henley-on-Thames, England.

In the Aerospace segment, main engine fuel pumps and some models of our airframe fuel pumps are manufactured, repaired and overhauled at our Cleveland facility. The remaining Aerospace segment products are manufactured, repaired and overhauled in our Costa Mesa facility. The Inglewood facility is exclusively an overhaul and repair shop for our main engine fuel pump products.

In the Industrial segment, all products are manufactured in the Costa Mesa facility with three exceptions: (i) industrial hose products which are manufactured in our Tucson facility; (ii) the AVR 2000 airport fuel management system, which is produced at our Henley-on-Thames facility; and (iii) industrial and marine gas turbine products, which are manufactured at our Cleveland facility. Repair and overhaul of Industrial segment products is conducted in our Cleveland and Costa Mesa facilities.

Most of the products at our Cleveland facility are manufactured internally. This facility houses our senior management and the majority of our Aerospace engineering and design staff, sales team and production and main distribution facilities. This facility is organized around manufacturing “cells” that produce bearings, gears, housings and shafts for assembly. By creating cells, the necessary people, machinery, materials and methods are focused on distinct products and processes. Each manufacturing cell includes members from each of the Manufacturing, Quality, Production Control, Statistical Process Control and Manufacturing Engineering disciplines. Our design engineering staff is also organized into cells which correspond to and complement the manufacturing cells. The manufacturing and engineering cells work together to achieve the timely design and production of our products.

In contrast to our substantial reliance on internal manufacturing of products in our Cleveland facility, we outsource most of the machining and pre-assembly production of products in our Costa Mesa facility to external providers. However, we do maintain internal equipment capacity at our Costa Mesa facility, which enables us to produce small quantity, quick turn components to reduce setup/breakdown times on smaller jobs and for the manufacturing control of key parts. We have lowered the cost of products manufactured in Costa Mesa by outsourcing capital intensive tasks such as casting and machining, while completing final assembly and testing on the premises.

All of the industrial hose products manufactured at our Tucson facility are processed internally. The software relating to the AVR 2000 airport fuel management system is written internally at our Henley-on-Thames facility, while the hardware relating to the system is sourced from two third parties.

In addition to our manufacturing facilities, we maintain sophisticated testing facilities at our Cleveland and Costa Mesa locations. These testing facilities allow for simulation of typical conditions and stresses that will be experienced by our products during use. Our products are also thoroughly tested for design compliance, performance and durability. To facilitate quality control and product development, we maintain a sophisticated chemistry and metallurgy laboratory at our Cleveland facility.

We have obtained and preserved our quality management system certifications. ISO-9001:2000 and AS 9100 Revision A certifications are recognized by most of our customers, as well as by the Federal Aviation Administration and U.S. government supply organizations.

Intellectual property

We rely on intellectual property, including a number of trade secrets, trademarks and patented and unpatented technology, to operate our business. We will continue to dedicate technical resources toward the further development of proprietary products and processes to maintain our competitive position in the markets we serve. Although we consider our intellectual property rights to be valuable, we do not believe that the loss of any such rights would have a material adverse effect on us.

Government regulations

The commercial aerospace industry is highly regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration in the United States, the Joint Aviation Authorities in Europe and the Civil Aviation Authority in England, while the military aerospace industry is governed by military quality (MIL or ISO-9000) specifications. We are required to be certified by one or more of these entities and, in some cases, by individual OEMs, in order to engineer and service parts and components used in specific aircraft models. We must also satisfy the requirements of our customers, including OEMs and airlines, that are subject to Federal Aviation Administration regulations, and provide these customers with products that comply with the government regulations applicable to commercial flight operations. In addition, the Federal Aviation Administration requires that various maintenance routines be performed on aircraft components. We currently satisfy or exceed these maintenance standards in our repair and overhaul activities. We maintain repair stations approved by the Federal Aviation Administration at our Cleveland, Costa Mesa and Inglewood facilities.

Our aviation and metals operations are also subject to a variety of worker and community safety laws. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, known as “OSHA,” mandates general requirements for safe workplaces for all employees. In addition, OSHA provides special procedures and measures for the handling of certain hazardous and toxic substances. We believe that our operations are in material compliance with OSHA’s health and safety requirements.

Competition

Competition among aerospace component manufacturers is based on engineered solutions, product quality, customer support, pricing and on-time delivery. Competitors in the Aerospace segment are primarily divisions of large corporations. Virtually all of Argo-Tech’s competitors have significantly greater financial resources than does Argo-Tech. ToOur ~~our~~primary ~~knowledge,~~competitors noin ~~other~~the ~~company~~aerospace ~~manufactures~~segment ~~and~~include ~~sells a~~Cobham, ~~broader~~Goodrich, ~~line~~Hamilton ofSundstrand, ~~fuel~~Intertechnique ~~related aerospace components~~and Parker-Hannifin.

In the Industrial segment, competition varies by product, but is typically based on engineered solutions, price, product quality and on-time delivery. Our primary competitors in the industrial segment include Ebara, Nikkiso and Meggitt.

Backlog

We believe that unfilled orders are not necessarily an indicator of future shipment levels of our products. As customers demand shorter lead times and flexibility in delivery schedules, they have also revised their purchasing practices. As a result, notification of firm orders may occur only within ~~thirty~~30 to ~~sixty~~ 60 days of delivery. In addition, due to to the government funding process, backlog can vary on a ~~period~~ period-to -period basis depending on the stage of completion of ~~the~~ the contracts represented by such backlog. Therefore, we believe that the backlog of unfilled orders at fiscal year end cannot be relied upon as a valid indication of our sales or profitability in a subsequent year.

6 ~~Development Expense Trends~~

Development expense trends

In connection with new aerospace product development programs, we incur significant research and development expenditures to design, test and qualify main engine fuel pumps and accessories for engine and airframe OEMs. Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred, and such expenses are expected to continue at historical levels. Research and development expenses were $11.9 million, $9.5 million and $11.7 million for the fiscal years ended October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003 and October 26, 2002, respectively.

Employees

As of October 2530, ~~2003~~2004, we had ~~654~~ 690 full-time employees of which ~~406~~409 are salaried and ~~248~~ 281 are hourly. The ~~159~~ 173 hourly employees located at our Cleveland facility are represented by the UAW under a collective bargaining agreement ~~expiring~~ that will expire on March 31, ~~2004~~2008.

Environmental ~~Matters~~matters

Our operations are subject to ~~federal~~a number of national, state and local environmental laws in the United States and other countries, and to regulation by government agencies, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Among other matters, these regulatory authorities impose requirements that regulate the emission, discharge, generation, management, transportation and disposal of pollutants and hazardous substances. These authorities ~~govern~~may ~~response~~require ~~actions~~response actions to hazardous substances which may be or have been released to the environment, and require us to obtain and maintain permits in connection with our operations. This extensive regulatory framework imposes significant compliance burdens and risks.

Although we ~~believe~~seek ~~that~~to maintain our operations and facilities ~~are currently~~ in compliance ~~in all material respects~~ with applicable environmental laws, there can be no assurance that ~~future~~we have no violations, or that changes in such laws, regulations or interpretations of such laws or in the nature of our operations will not require us to to make significant additional expenditures to ensure compliance in the future. We have not made or incurred in fiscal year 2004, and do not believe that we will have to make or incur in fiscal year 2005, material capital expenditures for our operations to comply with environmental laws or regulations of which we are aware or material costs for environmental remediation.

5 Our Cleveland facility is currently the subject of environmental remediation activities. The cost of these activities is the responsibility of TRW, now a subsidiary of Northrop Grumman, under the terms of the purchase agreement by which we acquired TRW’s Power Accessories Division in 1986. Remediation has been underway since 1989 and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. TRW has funded all necessary remediation costs and we expect that TRW will continue to do so in the future. We estimate that TRW has spent in excess of $15 million for environmental remediation at our Cleveland facility.

The 1986 TRW purchase agreement also requires TRW, for a period of 20 years from the date of the agreement, to indemnify us for:


	•	costs associated with third party environmental claims relating to environmental conditions arising from activities conducted by TRW during its operation of its Power Accessories Division that have not been conducted by us after our purchase of the assets of the division in 1986; and

	•	a portion of the costs associated with third party environmental claims arising from activities conducted by TRW and us, the portion of the costs to be paid by each party being determined based on the length of time each party conducted the activity giving rise to the claim.

We have received no third party environmental claims relating to the Cleveland facility.

In March 1986, a two thousand gallon underground storage tank was removed from our Costa Mesa facility. Petroleum hydrocarbon soil contamination was discovered during the removal of the tank, prompting the Orange County Health Care Agency to require a site assessment. Subsequent site investigations revealed that groundwater underlying the site is impacted by trichloroethene and perchloroethylene. In 1990, the Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a Cleanup and Abatement Order to J.C. Carter Company, Inc., or “Carter”(which we

~~expenditures~~acquired in 1997 and now operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary named Argo-Tech Corporation Costa Mesa), relating to ~~ensure~~the ~~compliance~~investigation inand remediation of groundwater contamination. To date, the ~~future~~full extent of the groundwater contamination has not been ascertained. By virtue of our ~~Currently~~acquisition of Carter, Carter’s responsibility for satisfying the cleanup order could affect us. However, we dohave obtained indemnification from Carter’s selling stockholders for, among other things, all costs and expenses related to satisfaction of the order. As a result, since our acquisition of Carter, we have not ~~believe~~paid any material portion of these costs and expenses. This indemnification does not expire. However, there can be no assurance that wesuch indemnification obligations with respect to the cleanup order will ~~have~~continue to ~~make~~be ~~material~~satisfied by ~~capital~~the ~~expenditures~~selling ~~for~~stockholders. ~~environmental~~See ~~remediation~~“Item 7. Management’s ~~for~~Discussion ~~the~~and ~~2004~~Analysis of Financial Condition ~~fiscal~~and ~~year~~Results of Operations — Risk factors — We have potential exposure resulting from environmental matters.”

Our Cleveland facility is currently the subject of environmental remediation activities. The cost of these activities is the responsibility of TRW, now a subsidiary of Northrop Grumman, under the terms of the purchase agreement by which we acquired TRW’s Power Accessories Division in 1986. Remediation has been underway since 1989 and is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. We have not paid for any material portion of the cost of the remediation and do not expect to do so in the future. TRW has funded all necessary remediation costs and we expect that TRW will continue to do so in the future. We estimate that TRW has spent in excess of $15 million for environmental remediation at our Cleveland facility.

The TRW purchase agreement also requires TRW, for a period of 20 years from the date of the 1986 purchase agreement, to indemnify us for:

	•	costs associated with third party environmental claims relating to environmental conditions arising from activities conducted by TRW during its operation of its Power Accessories Division that have not been conducted by us after our purchase of the assets of the division in 1986, and
	•	a portion of the costs associated with third party environmental claims arising from activities conducted by TRW and us, the portion of the costs to be paid by each party being determined based on the length of time each party conducted the activity giving rise to the claim.

To date, there have been no third party environmental claims relating to us or to the Cleveland facility.

In March 1986, a two thousand gallon spent underground storage tank was removed from our Costa Mesa facility. Petroleum hydrocarbon soil contamination was discovered during the removal of the tank, prompting the Orange County Health Care Agency to require a site assessment. Subsequent site investigations revealed that groundwater underlying the site is impacted by trichloroethene and perchloroethylene. In 1990, the Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a Cleanup and Abatement Order to J.C. Carter Company, Inc. (which we acquired in 1997 and now operate as a wholly owned subsidiary named Argo-Tech Corporation Costa Mesa) relating to the investigation and remediation of groundwater contamination. To date, the full extent of the groundwater contamination has not been ascertained. By virtue of our acquisition of Carter, we have assumed responsibility for satisfying the cleanup order. However, we have obtained indemnification from Carter’s selling stockholders for, among other things, all costs and expenses related to satisfaction of the order. However, there can be no assurance that such indemnification obligations with respect to the cleanup order will be satisfied by the selling stockholders. See “Risk Factors — Potential Exposure to Environmental Liabilities.”


Item 2.	Properties.

We own and operate a 150-acre business park in Cleveland, Ohio, which includes 1.8 million square feet of engineering, manufacturing and office space. We occupy approximately 475,000 square feet for our main engine fuel pump, airframe fuel pump and industrial gas turbine businesses ~~and~~ and lease almost one million square feet of the facility to ~~third~~ third parties. We believe that this facility’s machinery, ~~plants~~ plants and offices are in satisfactory operating condition. We ~~also~~ also believe that it has sufficient capacity to meet our ~~foreseeable~~ foreseeable future needs without significant additional capital expenditures. The Cleveland facility is utilized by both of our segments, Aerospace and Industrial.

We also own a 9.2-acre facility in Costa Mesa, California, which encompasses 165,000 covered square feet. We manufacture certain of our Aerospace segment’s airframe and ~~aerial~~ aerial refueling products and accessories, ~~and~~as well as our Industrial segment’s ground fueling and cryogenic products equipment at this facility. We believe that our Costa Mesa facility has sufficient capacity to permit further growth in those product lines without significant additional capital expenditures.

Our leased facility in Tucson, Arizona encompasses 85,000 square feet and includes available space ~~for~~ for expansion. We manufacture specialty industrial hose for our ~~aerospace~~Aerospace and Industrial segments, ~~chemical~~including ~~transfer~~hoses ~~and~~for chemical transfer, marine applications, ground fueling and aerial refueling at this facility. We believe ~~this~~the Tucson facility has sufficient capital and capacity to permit further growth in those product lines without significant additional capital expenditures.

Our Inglewood, California leased facility occupies approximately 6,000 square feet. Its primary purpose is to repair and overhaul main engine fuel pumps owned by airline customers. Inglewood’s assets include test stands for testing fuel pumps after overhaul and a small machine shop for simple rework of pump components. The Inglewood facility is utilized by our Aerospace segment.

~~Table~~ A leased facility at Henley-on-Thames, England occupies approximately 3,500 square feet. Its primary activities are the design, development and support of ~~Contents~~aviation refueling management systems for our Industrial segment.

A leased facility at Henley-on-Thames, England occupies approximately 3,500 square feet. Its primary activities are the design, development and support of aviation refueling management systems.


Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.

~~While~~We we are not presently involved in any ~~material~~ material legal proceedings. However, during the ordinary course of business, we are, from time to time, threatened with, or may become a party to, legal actions and other proceedings.


Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

No matter was submitted ~~during~~to ~~the~~a ~~fourth~~vote ~~quarter~~ of ~~the~~our ~~fiscal~~sole stockholder, ~~year~~AT ~~covered~~Holdings byCorporation, ~~this~~during ~~report~~the tofourth ~~a vote~~ quarter of ~~our security~~fiscal ~~holders~~year 2004.

PART II

Item 5. Market for ~~Our~~the Registrant’s Common Equity; ~~and~~ Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

We are a wholly owned subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation., which we refer to as “AT Holdings.” Neither AT Holdings nor Argo-Tech have any equity ~~securities~~ securities that trade, ~~and~~in ~~there~~an isestablished nopublic trading market ~~for~~or ~~any of these equity securities~~otherwise.

We paid cash dividends totaling $57.6 million to AT Holdings in fiscal year 2004. Our ability to pay any dividends to AT Holdings in the future is limited by the terms of the indenture pursuant to which our 9 1/4% Senior Notes due 2011 were issued and our existing credit facility. The indenture and credit facility contain certain optional and mandatory redemption features and other financial covenants, including restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make other restricted payments to AT Holdings. However, the indenture permits certain payments to AT Holdings for, among other things, corporate administrative expenses not to exceed $500,000 per fiscal year and specified tax obligations.

We have no equity compensation plans under which our securities are authorized for issuance.


Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.

Selected ~~Historical~~Consolidated Financial ~~and Other~~ Data ~~of Argo-Tech Corporation~~

The following table sets forth ~~selected~~Argo-Tech’s selected historical consolidated financial ~~and other~~ data ~~of Argo-Tech~~ for the fiscal years ~~1999~~2000 through ~~2003~~2004, which have been derived from ~~our~~ Argo-Tech’s audited consolidated financial statements for those ~~years~~periods. ~~Our~~ Argo-Tech’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in October and is identified according to the calendar year in which it ends. For example, the fiscal year ended October 25 30, ~~2003~~2004 is referred to as “fiscal ~~2003~~2004.” The 2004 fiscal year consisted of a 53-week period. All of the other fiscal years presented consisted of 52 ~~weeks~~-week periods. The information presented below should be read ~~together~~in ~~with~~conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and ~~related~~ notes thereto included elsewhere ~~herein~~in this report.

		Fiscal Year Ended
		October 25,			October 26,			October 27,			October 28,			October 30,
		October 30,			October 25,			October 26,			October 27,			October 28,
		2003			2002			2001			2000			1999
		2004			2003			2002			2001			2000
Statement of Operations Data:
		(Dollars in thousands)
	Net revenues	$	160,726		$	155,303		$	173,208		$	159,353		$	176,178
Operating results
	Gross profit		66,191			66,634			79,033			66,870			79,396
	Net revenues	$	187,328		$	160,726		$	155,303		$	173,208		$	159,353
	Operating Expenses		39,356			38,802			40,874			41,518			45,550
	Gross profit		78,125			66,191			66,634			79,033			66,870
	Income from operations		26,835			27,832			38,159			25,352			33,846
	Selling, general and administrative		31,166			26,417			23,359			23,094			24,404
	Interest expense		21,257			21,434			24,534			25,644			25,003
	Research and development		11,934			9,525			11,722			10,265			9,597
	Other, net		(529	)		(97	)		(51	)		(402	)		(516	)
	Amortization of intangibles		3,414			3,414			3,721			7,515			7,517
	Income tax provision (benefit)		1,579			569			2,876			(642	)		4,021
	Income from operations		31,611			26,835			27,832			38,159			25,352
	Net income	$	4,528		$	5,926		$	10,800		$	752		$	5,338
	Interest expense		22,705			21,257			21,434			24,534			25,644
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
	Debt extinguishment expense		12,961			—			—			—			—
	Total assets	$	255,797		$	260,333		$	273,574		$	277,334		$	294,745
	Other, net		(95	)		(529	)		(97	)		(51	)		(402	)
	Working capital		34,934			33,352			35,904			33,277			35,378
	Income tax provision (benefit)		(3,499	)		1,579			569			2,876			(642	)
	Long-term debt (including current maturities)		219,349			235,045			253,380			264,762			276,987
	Net income (loss)	$	(461	)	$	4,528		$	5,926		$	10,800		$	752
	Redeemable ESOP stock, net		14,612			8,835			13,994			20,983			43,212
	Shareholder’s equity/(deficiency)(a)		(29,928	)		(31,633	)		(42,119	)		(58,842	)		(78,955	)
Other Data:
	Gross margin		41.2	%		42.9	%		45.6	%		42.0	%		45.1	%
	Adjusted EBITDA(b)	$	36,310		$	37,505		$	53,324		$	41,973		$	52,284
	Adjusted EBITDA margin(c)		22.6	%		24.1	%		30.8	%		26.3	%		29.7	%
	Net cash flows provided by operating activities	$	15,673		$	30,724		$	18,063		$	22,427		$	15,298
	Net cash flows used in investing activities		(1,939	)		(1,785	)		(1,885	)		(3,025	)		(8,637	)
	Net cash flows used in financing activities		(17,446	)		(19,227	)		(13,295	)		(18,101	)		(14,366	)

	Fiscal Year Ended
	October 25,			October 26,			October 27,			October 28,			October 30,
	2003			2002			2001			2000			1999
Depreciation, goodwill, identified intangibles, and deferred financing fee amortization		10,053			10,387			15,214			15,635			15,973
Capital expenditures		1,939			1,785			1,885			3,025			6,050
Cash interest expense(d)		18,805			19,376			22,394			23,503			23,069
Ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to cash interest expense		1.9	x		1.9	x		2.4	x		1.8	x		2.3	x
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(e)		1.3	x		1.3	x		1.6	x		1.0	x		1.4	x

(a)		Includes a dividend of $50.0 million to AT Holdings in fiscal 1999. These funds came from the issuance of $55.0 million in principal amount of 8 5/8% senior subordinate notes, issued at a 5% discount, due 2007.
(b)		Adjusted EBITDA represents income from operations plus non-cash charges as follows:

	Fiscal Year Ended
	October 25,		October 26,		October 27,		October 28,		October 30,
	2003		2002		2001		2000		1999
Income from operations	$	26,835	$	27,832	$	38,159	$	25,352	$	33,846
Depreciation, goodwill and intangible amortization		7,601		8,329		13,074		13,494		14,039
Compensation expense — ESOP		1,874		1,344		2,091		2,972		4,322
Write-off of inventory acquisition step-up		—		—		—		155		77
Adjusted EBITDA	$	36,310	$	37,505	$	53,324	$	41,973	$	52,284

Our Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent cash flow from operations as defined by generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. We have included information concerning Adjusted EBITDA because we understand that it is used by certain investors as one measure of a borrower’s historical ability to service its debt. Adjusted EBITDA, as presented, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies, since not all companies necessarily calculate Adjusted EBITDA in an identical manner, and therefore is not necessarily an accurate means of comparison between companies. (c) Adjusted EBITDA margin is computed as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net revenues. (d) Cash interest expense represents interest expense less amortization of deferred financing fees of $2,452,000, $2,058,000, $2,140,000, $2,141,000 and $1,934,000, in the fiscal years ended October 25, 2003, October 26, 2002, October 27, 2001, October 28, 2000 and October 30, 1999, respectively. (e) For purposes of determining the ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges, earnings consist of income before taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness including amortization of deferred financing fees and fixed loan guarantee fees.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

We design, manufacture, sell and service high performance fuel flow devices and systems for both aerospace and general industrial applications. Argo-Tech operates in two business segments, Aerospace and Industrial. The Aerospace segment includes the design, manufacture, distribution, repair and overhaul of aviation products throughout the world consisting of aircraft engine fuel pumps, fuel flow related products and systems found on a plane’s airframe, and aerial refueling pumps and related equipment. The Industrial segment includes the design, manufacture and distribution of industrial pumps, ground fueling valves and related components, cryogenic pumps and nozzles for transferring liquefied natural gas and operation of a business park in Cleveland, Ohio

where we maintain our headquarters and one of our production facilities. Financial information by business segment can be found in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.



		Fiscal Year Ended

		October 30,			October 25,			October 26,			October 27,			October 28,
		2004			2003			2002			2001			2000


		(Dollars in thousands)
Balance sheet data (at end of period):
	Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,857		$	14,057		$	17,769		$	8,057		$	5,174
	Total assets		254,262			255,797			260,333			273,574			277,334
	Working capital		41,963			34,934			33,352			35,904			33,277
	Total debt		264,813			219,349			235,045			253,380			264,762
	Redeemable ESOP stock, net(1)		40,957			14,612			8,835			13,994			20,983
	Stockholder’s equity/ (deficiency)(2)		(110,976	)		(29,928	)		(31,633	)		(42,119	)		(58,842	)
Other data:
	Adjusted EBITDA(3)	$	44,893		$	36,867		$	38,447		$	54,066		$	42,671
	Adjusted EBITDA margin(4)		24.0	%		22.9	%		24.8	%		31.2	%		26.8	%
	Net cash flows provided by operating activities	$	33,230		$	15,673		$	30,724		$	18,063		$	22,427
	Net cash flows used in investing activities		(3,056	)		(1,939	)		(1,785	)		(1,885	)		(3,025	)
	Net cash flows used in financing activities		(28,374	)		(17,446	)		(19,227	)		(13,295	)		(18,101	)
	Depreciation and amortization of intangibles and deferred financing fees		9,175			10,053			10,387			15,214			15,635
	Capital expenditures		3,056			1,939			1,785			1,885			3,025
	Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(5)		—			1.3	x		1.3	x		1.6	x		1.0	x

In fiscal 2003, the Aerospace segment generated approximately 76% of our net revenues and the Industrial segment generated approximately 24% of our net revenues. Approximately 63% of the aerospace revenues were derived from sales to commercial OEMs and commercial aftermarket customers, while military revenues represented approximately 37% of our aerospace revenues. Approximately 64% of the industrial revenues were derived from sales to commercial customers, while military customers represented approximately 36% of our industrial revenues.


(1)	Redeemable ESOP Stock has been excluded from stockholder’s equity/(deficiency) due to the ability of holders of the ESOP Stock to “put,” subject to certain restrictions, the shares of ESOP Stock to Argo-Tech at the most recent valuation of our independent consulting firm.

(2)	Includes a dividend of $57.6 million to AT Holdings made in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 from the proceeds of the $250.0 million of senior notes.

(3)	“EBITDA” is net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. “Adjusted EBITDA” is defined as EBITDA further adjusted to exclude ESOP compensation expense, amortization of purchase accounting, non-cash compensation costs, write-off of inventory acquisition step-up, debt extinguishment expenses and a fixed asset write-off. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered as alternatives to, net income or cash flows provided by operating activities, as determined by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are included in this report because they are a basis upon which we assess our liquidity position and because certain covenants in our borrowing arrangements are tied to similar measures. We also believe that it is widely accepted that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide useful information regarding a company’s ability to service and/or incur indebtedness. This belief is based on our negotiations with our lenders who have indicated that the amount of indebtedness we will be permitted to incur will be based, in part, on our EBITDA and our Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not take into account our working capital requirements, debt service requirements, tax payments, capital expenditures and other commitments and, accordingly, are not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available for discretionary use. We believe that inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting Adjusted EBITDA are appropriate to provide additional information to investors.

In fiscal 2003, sales to commercial OEMs represented approximately 26% of our commercial aerospace revenues. As is customary in the commercial aerospace industry, we incur substantial costs, for which we are generally not reimbursed, to design, test and qualify original equipment for OEMs. Once qualified, OEM products generally are sold at or below cost of production in anticipation of receiving orders for commercial spare parts and overhaul activities at significantly higher margins. Most of our OEM sales are on a sole source basis; therefore, in most cases, we are the only OEM certified provider of these parts in the aftermarket. Over the approximately 30 year life cycle of an aircraft program, commercial spare parts and overhaul activities for products we manufacture often generate six or more times the aggregate net revenues of the OEM program. We have over 50 years of experience in most of our product lines which allows us to benefit from a large and growing installed base.

In contrast to the practice in the commercial aerospace industry, we are generally reimbursed for the design, test and qualification costs of equipment used on military aircraft. Military original equipment shipments generally are sold at cost plus a reasonable profit. Due to lower aircraft utilization, military aftermarket sales are less significant than commercial aftermarket sales. Aftermarket margins for military products are at a level higher than original equipment shipments.

General

The following should be read together with “Selected Historical Financial and Other Data of Argo-Tech Corporation” and our Financial Statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday of October and is identified according to the calendar year in which it ends. For example, the fiscal year ended October 25, 2003 is referred to as “fiscal 2003.” The fiscal years ended October 25, 2003, October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001 consisted of 52 weeks.

ESOP

We established our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) in 1994 by purchasing 420,000 shares of common stock of our parent company, AT Holdings Corporation, with the proceeds of a $16.8 million ten-year loan funded through a credit facility that was refinanced on July 18, 1997. The ESOP, which includes approximately 228 of our salaried employees, represents an ownership interest in AT Holdings of approximately 54%. GAAP requires that non-cash ESOP compensation expense and a corresponding increase in stockholders’ equity be recorded annually as shares held by the ESOP are allocated to participants and the loan made to the ESOP is repaid. GAAP also requires that this non-cash ESOP compensation expense be added back to net income in the determination of cash flow from operations. The aggregate amount of such non-cash ESOP compensation expense was $1.9 million, $1.3 million and $2.1 million for the fiscal years ended October 25, 2003, October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001, respectively.

Export Sales

Substantially all of our export sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. Export sales for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $66.7 million, $68.6 million and $80.8 million, respectively. Sales to Europe were $30.4 million, $28.0 million and $35.0 million. Export sales to all other regions, individually less than 10%, were $36.3 million, $40.6 million and $45.8 million for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

~~Critical~~The ~~Accounting~~following ~~Policies~~table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to EBITDA and net income:

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which enable the fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.



		Fiscal Year Ended

		October 30,			October 25,		October 26,		October 27,		October 28,
		2004			2003		2002		2001		2000


		(Dollars in thousands)
Net income (loss)		$	(461	)	$	4,528	$	5,926	$	10,800	$	752
Add:
	Depreciation and amortization		7,213			7,601		8,329		13,074		13,494
	Interest expense(a)		22,705			21,257		21,434		24,534		25,644
	Income tax provision (benefit)		(3,499	)		1,579		569		2,876		(642	)

EBITDA		$	25,958		$	34,965	$	36,258	$	51,284	$	39,248
Add:
	ESOP compensation expense(b)		4,851			1,874		1,344		2,091		2,972
	Amortization of purchase accounting(c)		—			28		259		4		296
	Non-cash compensation/benefit cost(d)		1,123			—		586		526		—
	Debt extinguishment expense(e)		12,961			—		—		—		—
	Write-off of inventory acquisition step-up		—			—		—		—		155
Fixed asset write-off			—			—		—		161		—

Adjusted EBITDA		$	44,893		$	36,867	$	38,447	$	54,066	$	42,671

~~Revenue Recognition –~~(a) ~~Revenues~~Interest ~~are generally~~expense ~~recognized~~includes ~~when~~the ~~goods~~amortization ~~are~~of ~~shipped~~deferred orfinancing ~~services provided,~~fees. at(b) ~~which~~Represents ~~time~~the ~~title~~value ~~and risk~~ of ~~loss passes to~~ the ~~customer.~~ ~~Substantially~~shares ~~all~~committed ~~sales are made pursuant~~ to ~~firm, fixed-price~~be ~~purchase~~released ~~orders~~by ~~received~~the ~~from~~ESOP ~~customers.~~trustee Weunder ~~have executed~~the ~~long-term~~ESOP’s ~~supply~~provisions ~~agreements~~for ~~with~~allocation ~~certain of our original equipment manufacturers. These agreements require us~~ to ~~supply~~ ~~all~~participants ~~the~~and ~~amounts~~recognized ~~ordered~~as bya ~~the~~non-cash ~~customers~~compensation ~~during~~expense. ~~the term~~ (~~generally three to five years~~c) ofRepresents the ~~agreements~~incremental atdepreciation ~~specified prices.~~relating Into ~~certain~~plant ofand ~~these~~equipment ~~agreements,~~written weup ~~expect~~ to ~~incur losses.~~its ~~Provisions~~fair ~~for~~market ~~estimating~~value ~~loss~~under ~~contracts~~purchase ~~are~~accounting ~~made~~applied into the ~~period~~ inacquisition ~~which~~of ~~such~~Argo-Tech ~~losses~~Corporation ~~are~~Costa ~~identified,~~Mesa ~~based~~(formerly onJ.C. ~~cost~~Carter ~~and pricing~~Company, ~~information~~Inc.). ~~and~~Such ~~estimated~~amortization ~~future~~is ~~shipment~~included ~~quantities provided~~in bycost ~~the~~of ~~customer~~sales. ~~The~~(d) ~~cumulative~~In ~~effect~~fiscal ofyear ~~revisions~~2001, ~~to estimated~~this ~~losses~~represents onthe ~~contracts~~non-cash isexpense ~~recorded~~related into the ~~accounting period~~remeasurement inof ~~which~~ the ~~amounts~~stock ~~become~~option ~~known~~plans ~~and~~whose ~~can~~expiration bedate ~~reasonably estimated~~was extended. ~~Such~~In ~~revisions~~fiscal ~~could~~year ~~occur~~2002, atthis ~~any~~represents ~~time~~the ~~there~~non-cash ~~are changes~~expense related to ~~estimated~~a ~~future~~salary ~~revenues~~early orretirement ~~costs~~program. ~~Revenue~~In ~~from certain~~fiscal ~~fixed~~year ~~price~~2004, ~~engineering~~this ~~contracts~~represents ~~for~~the ~~which~~non-cash ~~costs~~compensation ~~can~~expense ~~be reliably~~related ~~estimated~~to ~~are~~our ~~recognized~~ESOP ~~based~~Excess onBenefit ~~milestone billings~~Plan. ~~Variations~~ in(e) ~~actual~~Represents ~~labor~~the ~~performance,~~write-off ~~changes~~of todeferred ~~estimated profitability~~financing ~~and~~fees ~~final~~associated ~~contract~~with ~~settlements may result in revisions to~~ the ~~cost~~refinancing ~~estimates.~~of ~~Revisions~~our in8 ~~cost~~5/8% ~~estimates~~senior ~~as contracts~~subordinated ~~progress~~notes ~~have~~and the ~~effect~~amendment and restatement of ~~increasing~~our orcredit ~~decreasing profits~~agreement in ~~the~~June ~~period~~2004, ofamounts ~~revision.~~paid Wefor ~~record~~the ~~estimated reductions~~tender, toconsent ~~revenue~~and ~~for~~redemption ~~volume-based~~of ~~incentives~~our ~~based~~senior ~~on expected~~subordinated ~~customer~~notes ~~activity~~and ~~for~~ the ~~applicable~~recognition ~~period.~~of ~~Revisions for~~the ~~volume-based~~remaining ~~incentives~~accretion ~~are~~on ~~recorded~~a inportion ~~the~~of ~~accounting period~~our insenior ~~which~~subordinated ~~such~~notes ~~estimates~~that ~~can~~were beissued ~~reasonably~~at ~~determined~~a discount.

~~Valuation~~The offollowing ~~Accounts~~table ~~Receivable~~reconciles ~~and~~Adjusted ~~Allowance for~~EBITDA Doubtful Accounts – We evaluate the collectibility of our trade receivables based on a combination of factors. We regularly analyze our customer accounts, and when we become aware of a specific customer’s inability to ~~meet its financial obligation to us, such as in the~~ ~~case~~net ofcash aflow ~~bankruptcy~~from ~~filing,~~operating ~~we immediately record a bad debt~~activities: ~~expense and reduce the related receivable to the amount we~~ ~~reasonably believe is collectible. We estimate the allowance for~~ doubtful accounts based on the aging of the accounts receivable, customer creditworthiness and historical experience. Our estimate of the allowance amounts includes amounts for specifically identified losses and a general amount for estimated losses. If circumstances change or economic conditions deteriorate, our estimates of the recoverability of receivables could be further adjusted.

Valuation of Inventories – Our inventory purchases and commitments are made in order to build inventory to meet future shipment schedules based on forecasted demand for our products. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined on the first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method. Periodically, we perform a detailed assessment of inventory, which includes a review of, among other factors, historical sales activity, future demand requirements, product life cycle and development plans and quality issues. Based on this analysis, we record provisions for potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory to reflect inventory at net realizable value. These provisions could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual requirements based upon future economic conditions, customer inventory levels or competitive factors that were not foreseen, or did not exist, when the valuation allowances were established.


	October 30,			October 25,			October 26,			October 27,			October 28,
	2004			2003			2002			2001			2000


	(Dollars in thousands)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	44,893		$	36,867		$	38,447		$	54,066		$	42,671
Change in operating assets and liabilities		8,424			(590	)		14,973			(6,559	)		5,342
Interest expense		(22,705	)		(21,257	)		(21,434	)		(24,534	)		(25,644	)
Income tax benefit (provision)		3,499			(1,579	)		(569	)		(2,876	)		642
All other adjustments		(881	)		2,232			(693	)		(2,034	)		(584	)

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	33,230		$	15,673		$	30,724		$	18,063		$	22,427

Valuation of Goodwill and Intangible Assets – Goodwill and identified intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. Intangible assets other than goodwill are recognized if the benefit of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, licensed or exchanged, regardless of the Company’s intent to do so. Intangible assets, such as goodwill, that have an indefinite useful life are not amortized. All other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We review goodwill and purchased intangible assets for impairment annually, or whenever


(4)	Adjusted EBITDA margin is computed as Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net revenues.

(5)	For purposes of determining the ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges, earnings consist of income before taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness including amortization of

~~events~~deferred orfinancing ~~changes~~fees inand ~~circumstances~~fixed ~~indicate~~loan ~~the carrying~~guarantee ~~value of an asset may not be recoverable~~fees. ~~Our~~No ~~asset impairment~~ratio ~~review~~is ~~assesses~~presented ~~the~~for ~~fair value of~~ the ~~assets~~fiscal ~~based~~year ~~on the~~ended ~~future~~October ~~cash flows the assets are expected to generate. This approach uses our estimates of future market growth~~30, ~~forecasted revenue~~2004 ~~and~~as ~~costs~~the ~~and~~earnings ~~appropriate~~for ~~discount~~that ~~rates.~~period ~~When impairment~~were ~~is identified~~$3,960,000 ~~the~~less ~~carrying~~than ~~amount of~~ the ~~asset~~fixed ~~is reduced to its estimated fair value~~charges.

~~Recent~~Item ~~Developments~~ 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

~~Following~~The ~~the~~following ~~September 11,~~discussion ~~2001~~should ~~terrorist attacks,~~be ~~the~~read ~~aerospace industry experienced a significant downturn~~ in ~~both the OEM and aftermarket sectors. The major~~ ~~commercial~~conjunction ~~airlines~~with ~~have~~our ~~reduced~~financial ~~their~~statements ~~flying capacity by retiring older aircraft in their fleet, parking underutilized aircraft~~ and ~~canceling or delaying~~ the ~~delivery~~notes ~~of new aircraft. The OEM build rates of new commercial aircraft have been reduced due~~ to ~~the airlines’ cancellation or delay of delivery of~~those ~~new~~statements ~~aircraft. The reduction of flying capacity, the retirement of older aircraft~~ and ~~the~~other ~~deferral~~financial ofinformation ~~maintenance~~included ~~has~~elsewhere ~~reduced~~in ~~the~~this ~~need for aftermarket services~~report. ItThis isreport ~~anticipated~~contains ~~that~~forward-looking ~~OEM~~statements ~~build~~that ~~rates~~involve ~~will~~risks ~~stabilize~~and ~~with modest increases estimated to occur in 2005~~uncertainties. WeOur ~~anticipate~~actual ~~aftermarket~~results ~~activities will begin~~may todiffer ~~recover~~materially infrom ~~the~~those ~~latter~~indicated ~~part of 2004. Military revenues have increased primarily as a result of the military activity~~ in the ~~Middle~~ ~~East. We anticipate aftermarket military revenues for~~forward-looking ~~repair and overhaul services to remain steady in 2004 and OEM military revenue to increase as a result of increased production on several programs~~statements. WeSee ~~anticipate~~“— Risk ~~increased~~factors” ~~Industrial~~below ~~revenues in 2004 primarily due to increased demand~~ for ~~our ground~~ ~~fueling,~~more ~~cryogenic~~information ~~and~~regarding ~~industrial~~forward-looking ~~gas turbine products~~statements.

~~Our fiscal year 2004 revenues and cash flows are~~Overview ~~forecasted to be higher than fiscal year 2003 and Management~~ ~~believes that we will be able to maintain our liquidity and remain in compliance with our debt covenants.~~

~~This~~We ~~section~~are ~~includes~~a ~~forward-looking~~global ~~statements within~~designer, ~~the~~manufacturer ~~meaning~~and servicer of ~~Section 27A~~high ofperformance ~~the~~fuel ~~Securities~~flow ~~Act~~devices and systems. We ~~Section 21E~~operate ofin ~~the~~two ~~Securities~~business ~~Exchange~~segments, ~~Act~~Aerospace and Industrial. The Aerospace segment consists of ~~1934~~aircraft engine fuel pumps and other engine products, ascommercial and military products and ~~amended~~systems found on a plane’s airframe, and aerial refueling pumps and related equipment. ~~There~~The Industrial segment includes ground fueling nozzles, hoses and other ground fueling components, an automated fuel management system, cryogenic pumps and nozzles and the operation of a business park in Cleveland, Ohio. Financial information by business segment can be nofound ~~assurances~~in Note 13 ~~that~~to ~~our~~the ~~current~~audited ~~outlook~~consolidated financial statements ~~will~~included ~~prove~~elsewhere toin bethis ~~correct~~report.

~~Results~~In fiscal 2004, the Aerospace segment generated approximately 74% of ~~Operations~~our net revenues and the Industrial segment generated approximately 26% of our net revenues. Approximately 63% of the aerospace revenues were derived from sales to commercial OEMs and commercial aftermarket customers, while military revenues represented approximately 37% of our aerospace revenues. Approximately 58% of the industrial revenues were derived from sales to commercial customers, while military customers represented approximately 42% of our industrial revenues.

~~The~~In ~~following~~fiscal ~~table~~2004, ~~presents~~sales to commercial OEMs represented approximately 26% of our commercial aerospace revenues. As is customary in the commercial aerospace industry, we incur substantial costs, for ~~the~~which ~~periods~~we are generally not ~~indicated~~reimbursed, ~~selected~~to ~~items~~design, test and qualify original equipment for OEMs. Once qualified, OEM products generally are sold at or below cost of production in anticipation of receiving orders for commercial spare parts and overhaul activities at significantly higher margins. Most of our ~~consolidated~~OEM ~~statements~~sales are on a sole source basis; therefore, in most cases, we are the only OEM certified provider of these parts in the aftermarket. Over the ~~income~~approximately as30 year alife ~~percentage~~cycle of ~~net~~an aircraft program, commercial spare parts and overhaul activities for products we manufacture often generate six or more times the aggregate net revenues of the OEM program. We have over 50 years of experience in most of our product lines which allows us to benefit from a large and growing installed base.

	Fiscal Year Ended
	October 25, 2003			October 26, 2002			October 27, 2001
Net revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Gross profit		41.2	%		42.9	%		45.6	%
Operating expenses		24.5	%		25.0	%		23.6	%
Income from operations		16.7	%		17.9	%		22.0	%
Interest expense		13.2	%		13.7	%		14.1	%
Other, net		(0.3	)%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Income before income taxes		3.8	%		4.2	%		7.9	%
Income tax provision		1.0	%		0.4	%		1.7	%
Net income		2.8	%		3.8	%		6.2	%

~~Fiscal~~The ~~2003~~following ~~Compared~~is ~~with~~management’s ~~Fiscal~~discussion and ~~2002~~analysis of certain significant factors which have affected Argo-Tech’s financial position and operating results during the periods presented in the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements. Argo-Tech’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday of October and is identified according to the calendar year in which it ends.

~~Net revenues for fiscal 2003 increased~~ESOP ~~$5.4 million, or 3.5%, to $160.7 million from~~ $155.3 million for fiscal 2002. This change was due to an increase in aerospace revenues of $0.3 million and a $5.1 million increase in industrial revenues. The increase in aerospace revenues was attributable to an increase of $9.8 million in military revenues offset by a decrease of $9.5 million in commercial revenues. Commercial OEM revenues decreased $0.6 million, or 2.9%, to $20.2 million and commercial aftermarket revenues decreased $8.9 million, or 13.7%, to $56.3 million. Commercial OEM revenues declined as a result of lower overall engine requirements from our

We established our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) in 1994 by purchasing 420,000 shares of common stock of our parent company, AT Holdings, with the proceeds of a $16.8 million ten-year loan funded through a credit facility that was refinanced on July 18, 1997. The term of the loan ended on April 28, 2004, at which time the remaining amount of the loan was repaid in full, releasing the final 21,000 shares of stock which

~~customers~~represented ina ~~response~~half-year toallocation ~~decreasing~~from ~~aircraft~~the ~~build~~suspense ~~rates~~account. ~~Commercial~~We ~~aftermarket~~decided ~~revenues~~to ~~were~~continue ~~lower~~this employee benefit ~~primarily~~by ~~due~~contributing 21,000 shares of AT Holdings common stock to athe ~~decrease~~plan in ~~the~~October ~~demand~~2004. ~~for~~We ~~spare~~plan ~~part~~to ~~sales~~contribute ~~and~~42,000 shares ~~repair~~in ~~and~~October ~~overhaul~~2005. ~~activities~~All of these 63,000 shares have been repurchased by Argo-Tech from plan participants who exercised their put option rights under the plan. The ~~lower~~ESOP, ~~demand~~which ~~for~~includes approximately 225 of our salaried ~~aftermarket~~employees, ~~sales~~represents ~~and~~an ~~activities~~ownership isinterest ain ~~result~~AT Holdings of approximately ~~the~~54%. ~~reduced~~GAAP requires that non-cash ESOP compensation ~~flying~~expense and a corresponding increase in stockholders’ equity be recorded annually as shares held by ~~commercial~~the ~~airlines,~~ESOP are allocated to participants and the ~~availability~~loan ofmade ~~spare~~to ~~parts~~the ESOP is ~~taken~~repaid. ~~from~~GAAP ~~parked~~also ~~aircraft~~requires ~~and~~that ~~deferral~~this ofnon-cash ~~maintenance.~~ESOP ~~Military~~compensation ~~revenues~~expense ~~increased~~be ~~primarily~~added ~~due~~back to ~~revenue~~net ~~related~~income toin ~~increased~~the determination of cash ~~sales~~flow onfrom aoperations. ~~variety~~The aggregate amount of ~~OEM~~such non-cash ESOP compensation expense was $4.9 million, $1.9 million and ~~aftermarket~~$1.3 million ~~aerial~~for ~~refueling~~the fiscal years ended ~~components~~October 30, ~~main~~2004, ~~engine~~October 25, ~~pump~~2003 and October 26, ~~airframe components~~2002, asrespectively. ~~well~~In asaddition, participants anmay ~~increase~~require us, in ~~revenues~~certain ~~related~~circumstances, to ~~airframe~~repurchase ~~components~~shares of onAT Holdings common stock that they receive from the ESOP at ~~various~~the ~~OEM~~most ~~development~~recent ~~programs~~valuation of our independent consulting firm. ~~Industrial~~In fiscal ~~revenues~~2002, ~~increased~~2003 and 2004, we were required to repurchase an aggregate of approximately $50.15 million, ~~primarily~~$0.3 million and ~~due~~$0.6 million, torespectively, anof ~~increase~~redeemable inESOP ~~ground~~stock, ~~fueling~~which ~~and~~we ~~cryogenic~~purchased ~~pump~~using ~~revenues~~available ~~offset~~cash. byIn afiscal ~~decrease~~2005, inwe ~~industrial~~estimate ~~gas~~our ~~turbine~~repurchase ~~revenues~~obligations could be between $3.5 million ~~Approximately~~and 41$4.5% million. ofSee ~~fiscal~~“Risk ~~2003~~factors — ~~net~~Risks ~~revenues~~associated ~~were~~with ~~attributable~~our tobusiness ~~export~~and operations — ~~sales~~Our tocash ~~foreign~~flows and capital resources may ~~customers~~be ~~compared~~adversely toaffected ~~44.2%~~by inexercises ~~fiscal~~of ~~2002.~~rights ~~Substantially~~to ~~all~~require us to ~~such~~repurchase ~~sales~~or ~~were~~redeem ~~denominated~~securities inof UAT Holdings.~~S. dollars.~~”

~~Aerospace gross profit for fiscal 2003 decreased~~Refinancing ~~$1.4 million, or 2.6%, to $53.5 million from~~ $54.9 million for fiscal 2002. Gross margin decreased to 44.2% for fiscal 2003 from 45.4% for fiscal 2002. The decrease in gross profit and gross margin is primarily attributable to a decrease in higher margin commercial aerospace aftermarket revenues and an increase in non-cash ESOP compensation expense partially offset by an increase in military revenues and a change in classification and allocation of $2.1 million of certain costs to selling, general and administrative expenses. Industrial gross profit for fiscal 2003 increased $0.6 million, or 4.8%, to $13.0 million from $12.4 million in fiscal 2002. The increase in gross profit was attributable to an increase in ground fueling revenues partially offset by an increase in utility costs associated with the operation of our business park and a decrease in industrial gas turbine revenues. Gross margin, which decreased to 33.0% in fiscal 2003 from 36.1% in fiscal 2002, was lower primarily due to the increase in utility costs, an unfavorable sales mix of ground fueling products and an increase in cryogenic pump manufacturing costs.

~~Operating~~On ~~expenses for fiscal 2003 increased $0.6~~June ~~million~~23, ~~or 1.5% to $39.4 million from $38.8 million in fiscal 2002. Selling~~2004, ~~general~~we ~~and administrative~~completed ~~expenses increased $3.0 million due to~~ a ~~$2.1 million~~ ~~change in classification and allocation of~~refinancing ~~certain~~of ~~costs~~substantially ~~from~~all ~~cost~~ of ~~sales,~~our anoutstanding ~~increase in marketing costs~~indebtedness, ~~bid and proposal costs, legal costs, severance costs~~including ~~associated with a reduction in~~ the ~~salaried~~capital ~~workforce~~structure ~~and an increase in non-cash ESOP compensation expense offset by the non-recurrence~~ of aour non-cash expense of $0.6 million related to a salaried employee early retirement program in fiscal 2002. Research and development expenses decreased $2.2 million due to an increase in customer paid development expensesparent, ~~which~~AT ~~are included in cost of revenues~~Holdings, ~~and~~ ~~a decrease in spending related to programs nearing~~by: ~~completion. Operating expenses as a percent of revenues~~ ~~decreased to 24.5% for fiscal 2003 from 25.0% in fiscal 2002.~~

~~Income~~• ~~from~~purchasing ~~operations~~through ~~for~~a ~~fiscal~~tender ~~2003~~offer ~~decreased~~ our outstanding $1195.0 million, oraggregate ~~3.6%~~principal amount of senior subordinated notes due 2007, totogether with a premium of approximately $265.8 5 million ~~from~~ and accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $274.8 0 million, inand ~~fiscal~~redeeming ~~2002.~~any Asof athese ~~percent~~notes ofthat ~~revenues, income~~were ~~from~~not ~~operations~~tendered; ~~for~~• ~~fiscal~~redeeming ~~2003~~all ~~decreased~~of toAT ~~16.7%~~Holdings’ ~~from 17.9%~~outstanding inSeries ~~fiscal~~A ~~2002.~~Cumulative ~~These~~Exchangeable ~~decreases~~Redeemable ~~were~~Preferred ~~primarily~~Stock ~~due~~(referred to ~~the decrease~~ in ~~higher~~this ~~margin~~report ~~commercial~~as ~~aerospace~~the ~~aftermarket revenues~~“Holdings ~~partially~~Preferred ~~offset~~Stock”) byat an100% ~~increase~~of inthe ~~military~~$30.0 ~~and industrial~~million ~~revenues~~liquidation preference, antogether ~~increase~~with inaccrued ~~utility~~and ~~costs~~unpaid ~~associated with~~dividends ~~the~~of ~~operation~~$27.6 ofmillion; ~~our~~and ~~business~~• ~~park~~restating ~~and~~$19.8 anmillion ~~increase~~of ~~in selling,~~term ~~general~~loans ~~and~~outstanding ~~administrative~~under ~~expenses~~our ~~offset~~then-existing bysenior ~~a decrease~~credit infacility, ~~research~~together with accrued and ~~development~~unpaid ~~expenses~~interest ~~discussed~~of ~~above~~$0. 1 million.

~~Interest~~The ~~expense~~above ~~for~~transactions ~~fiscal~~and ~~2003~~the ~~decreased~~payment of ~~$0.2 million,~~associated orfees ~~0.9%,~~and toexpenses ~~$21.2~~are ~~million~~collectively ~~from $21.4 million~~referred ~~for fiscal 2002 due~~ to ~~lower outstanding borrowings which were partially offset by an increase~~ in ~~interest~~this ~~rates~~report onas the ~~term loan and increased amortization of deferred financing fees resulting from the amendment of our credit agreement~~“Refinancing.”

~~The~~Recent ~~income tax provision for fiscal 2003~~developments ~~increased $1.0 million to $1.6 million from~~ ~~$0.6 million in fiscal 2002. A reconciliation of the income tax provision can be found in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.~~

~~Net~~Following ~~income~~the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the commercial aerospace industry experienced a significant downturn in both the OEM and aftermarket sectors. The major commercial airlines reduced their flying capacity by retiring older aircraft, parking underutilized aircraft and canceling or delaying the delivery of new aircraft. Additionally, many airlines deferred maintenance which reduced the need for ~~fiscal~~aftermarket ~~2003~~services. ~~decreased~~During 2004, commercial OEM $1and aftermarket revenues increased 11.4 ~~million~~% toand $415.~~5 million~~3%, respectively. ~~from~~It $5is anticipated that commercial OEM and aftermarket revenues will increase modestly in 2005.~~9 million~~ Military ~~for~~revenues ~~fiscal~~increased ~~2002~~13.4% ~~primarily~~in 2004 due to demand for aftermarket products and services as a result of military activity in the Middle ~~revenue~~East and ~~expense~~due ~~factors~~to increased production on several OEM ~~discussed~~programs. ~~above~~We anticipate military revenues will remain steady in 2005. We anticipate increased Industrial revenues in 2005 primarily due to increased demand for our ground fueling and cryogenic products.

~~Fiscal~~Our ~~2002~~fiscal ~~Compared~~year 2005 revenues and cash flows are forecasted to be higher than fiscal year 2004 due to continued improvement in the commercial aerospace industry and improved performance in our cryogenic products business, partially offset by increased development expenses related to new programs. Management believes that we will be able to maintain our liquidity and remain in compliance with ~~Fiscal~~our debt covenants. ~~2001~~

Net revenues for fiscal 2002 decreased $17.9 million, or 10.3%, to $155.3 million from $173.2 million for fiscal 2001. This change was due to a decrease in aerospace revenues of $21.1 million and a $3.2 million increase

inOur ~~industrial~~parent, ~~and~~AT ~~other~~Holdings, ~~revenues.~~owns ~~The~~an ~~decrease~~asset intracking ~~aerospace~~technology ~~revenues~~that ~~was~~is ~~attributable~~currently toin adevelopment. ~~decrease~~Argo-Tech ofprovides ~~$29.9 million~~the infunding ~~commercial~~for ~~revenues~~the ~~and~~development ~~an increase~~ of ~~$8.8 million~~ inthis ~~military~~technology ~~revenues. Commercial OEM revenues~~through ~~decreased~~dividends ~~$10.0 million,~~to orAT 32Holdings.~~6%,~~ toDuring ~~$20.8 million and~~fiscal ~~commercial~~year ~~aftermarket~~2004, ~~revenues~~we ~~decreased~~dividended $190.9 million, ~~or 23.3%,~~ to ~~$65.2 million.~~AT ~~Commercial OEM~~Holdings revenues declined as a result of lower overall engine requirements from our customers in response to decreasing aircraft build rates. Commercial aftermarket revenues were lower primarily due to a decrease in the demand for ~~spare~~development ~~part sales and repair and overhaul activities~~expenses. ~~The lower demand for~~We ~~aftermarket~~estimate ~~sales~~that ~~and activities is a result of~~ the ~~reduced flying~~dividend ~~by commercial airlines, the availability of spare parts taken from parked aircraft and deferral of maintenance. Military revenues increased 33.8% primarily due~~ to ~~revenue~~fund ~~related~~this ~~to increased~~technology ~~sales~~in ~~of KC-135 aerial refueling pumps, F-16 and F-22~~fiscal ~~airframe~~year ~~components,~~2005 ~~F-18E/~~will Fbe ~~480~~approximately ~~gallon fuel tank components and higher sales of aftermarket parts and overhaul activities on a variety of aerial refueling and airframe programs. Industrial revenues increased~~ $3.20 million,. ~~primarily~~This ~~due~~dividend is towithin ~~an increase~~the inrestrictions ~~ground~~contained ~~fueling~~in ~~and~~both ~~cryogenic~~our ~~pump~~indenture and ~~nozzle~~ ~~revenues~~credit ~~offset~~facility bygoverning aour ~~decrease~~ability into ~~industrial~~pay ~~gas~~dividends ~~turbine revenues.~~or ~~Approximately 44.2% of fiscal 2002 net revenues were~~make ~~attributable~~other torestricted ~~export~~payments ~~sales~~ to ~~foreign~~our ~~customers compared to 46~~parent.~~6% in fiscal 2001. Substantially all such sales were~~ ~~denominated in U.S. dollars.~~

~~Aerospace~~This ~~gross~~section ~~profit~~includes ~~for~~forward-looking ~~fiscal 2002 decreased~~statements ~~$14.4 million,~~within or 20.8%, to $54.9 million from $69.3 million for fiscal 2001. Gross margin decreased to 45.4% for fiscal 2002 from 48.8% for fiscal 2001. The decrease in gross profit and gross margin is primarily attributable to the ~~decreased~~meaning ~~sales~~ of ~~higher margin commercial aerospace aftermarket revenues, a $0.6~~Section ~~million~~27A ~~provision~~of ~~for potential~~the ~~losses~~Securities ~~for~~Act ~~inventory on hand~~ and ~~termination claims~~ ~~relating~~Section 21E toof the ~~bankruptcy~~Securities ofExchange aAct ~~former airframe customer, and lower absorption~~ of ~~fixed manufacturing overhead. Industrial gross profit for fiscal 2002 increased $2.8 million~~1934, ~~or 29.2%,~~as ~~to $12~~amended.~~4 million~~ ~~from~~There ~~$9.6 million~~can ~~for~~be ~~fiscal~~no ~~2001. Gross~~assurances ~~margin~~that ~~increased~~our tocurrent ~~36.1% from 30.9% for fiscal 2001. The~~outlook ~~increase~~will inprove ~~gross profit and gross margin is primarily attributable~~ to ~~the~~be ~~favorable mix of higher margin ground fueling revenues~~correct.

~~Operating~~Critical ~~expenses~~accounting ~~for fiscal 2002 decreased~~policies ~~$2.1 million, or 5.1% to $38.8 million from~~ $40.9 million in fiscal 2001. This decrease is primarily attributable to the cessation of goodwill and workforce in place amortization of $3.8 million as a result of adopting SFAS No. 142 on October 28, 2001, offset by an increase in research and development expenses of $1.4 million and selling, general and administrative expenses of $0.3, which includes a non-cash expense of $0.6 million related to a salaried employee early retirement program. Operating expenses as a percent of revenues increased to 25.0% for fiscal 2002 from 23.6% in fiscal 2001.

~~Income~~Our ~~from~~consolidated ~~operations~~financial ~~for~~statements ~~fiscal~~have ~~2002~~been prepared ~~decreased~~in accordance with accounting principles generally ~~$10.3 million,~~accepted orin ~~27.0%,~~the toUnited ~~$27~~States of America.~~8 million~~ ~~from~~The preparation of ~~$38.1 million~~these ~~for~~financial ~~fiscal~~statements ~~2001~~requires management to make estimates and ~~decreased~~assumptions asthat aaffect ~~percentage of~~the ~~net~~reported ~~revenues~~amounts toof ~~17.9%~~assets, liabilities, inrevenue ~~fiscal~~and ~~2002~~expenses, ~~from~~and ~~22.0%~~related indisclosure ~~fiscal~~of ~~2001~~contingent assets and liabilities. ~~These~~Management ~~decreases~~bases ~~were~~its estimates ~~due~~on tohistorical ~~the~~experience ~~decrease~~and inon ~~higher~~various ~~margin~~other ~~commercial~~assumptions ~~aerospace~~that ~~aftermarket~~are ~~revenues,~~believed ato ~~$0.6 million~~be reasonable under the ~~provision~~circumstances, ~~for~~the ~~potential~~results ~~losses~~of ~~for~~which ~~inventory~~enable onthe ~~hand~~fair ~~and~~presentation ~~termination~~of ~~claims~~our ~~relating~~financial toposition ~~the~~and ~~bankruptcy~~results of aoperations. ~~former~~Actual ~~airframe~~results ~~customer,~~may ~~and~~differ ~~lower~~from ~~absorption~~these ofestimates ~~fixed~~under ~~manufacturing~~different ~~overhead~~assumptions ~~offset~~or byconditions. anManagement ~~increase~~believes inthe ~~industrial~~following critical ~~revenues~~accounting ~~and~~policies ~~lower~~reflect its more significant ~~operating~~estimates ~~expenses~~and ~~discussed~~assumptions ~~above~~used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

~~Interest~~Revenue ~~expense~~Recognition. Revenues ~~for~~are ~~fiscal~~generally ~~2002~~recognized ~~decreased~~when goods are shipped or $3services provided, at which time title and risk of loss passes to the customer.~~1 million~~ Substantially all sales are made pursuant to firm, orfixed-price 12purchase orders received from customers.7% We have executed long-term supply agreements with certain of our OEM customers. These agreements require Argo-Tech to supply all the amounts ordered by the customers during the term of the agreements (generally three to five years) at specified prices. Under certain of these agreements, we expect to ~~$21~~incur losses.~~4 million~~ Provisions ~~from~~for estimating losses on these contracts are made in ~~$24~~the period in which such losses are identified based on cost and pricing information and estimated future shipment quantities provided by the customer.~~5 million~~ ~~for~~The ~~fiscal~~cumulative ~~2001~~effect ~~due~~of revisions to estimated ~~lower~~losses ~~outstanding~~on contracts is recorded in the accounting ~~borrowings~~period in which the amounts become known and ~~lower~~can ~~interest~~be ~~rates~~reasonably estimated. Such revisions could occur at any time there are changes to estimated future revenues or costs. Revenue from certain fixed price engineering contracts for which costs can be reliably estimated are recognized based on milestone billings. Variations in actual labor performance, changes to estimated profitability and final contract settlements may result in revisions to the ~~term~~cost ~~loans~~estimates. Revisions in cost estimates as contracts progress have the effect of increasing or decreasing profits in the period of revision. We record estimated reductions to revenue for volume-based incentives based on expected customer activity for the applicable period. Revisions for volume-based incentives are recorded in the accounting period in which such estimates can be reasonably determined.

~~The~~Valuation ~~income~~of ~~tax~~Accounts ~~provision~~Receivable and Allowance for ~~fiscal~~Doubtful ~~2002~~Accounts. We evaluate the ~~decreased~~collectibility ~~$2.3 million,~~of orour ~~79.3%,~~trade toreceivables ~~$0.6 million~~based ~~from~~on a combination $2of factors.~~9 million~~ inWe ~~fiscal~~regularly ~~2001.~~analyze ~~This~~our ~~decrease~~customer isaccounts, ~~primarily~~and ~~due~~when towe become aware of a ~~lower~~specific ~~pre-tax~~customer’s ~~income~~inability to meet its financial obligation to us, such as in the case of bankruptcy ~~$6.5 million~~filings, ~~for~~we ~~fiscal~~immediately ~~2002~~record a bad debt expense and asreduce ~~compared~~the related receivable to ~~$13.7 million~~the ~~for~~amount ~~fiscal~~we ~~2001~~reasonably believe is collectible. AWe estimate the allowance for doubtful ~~reconciliation~~accounts based on the aging of the ~~income~~accounts ~~tax~~receivable, ~~provision~~customer creditworthiness ~~can~~and behistorical ~~found~~experience. inOur ~~Note 11~~estimate toof the allowance ~~consolidated~~amounts ~~financial~~includes ~~statements~~amounts ~~included~~for ~~elsewhere~~specifically identified inlosses ~~this~~and ~~report~~a general amount for estimated losses. If circumstances change or economic conditions deteriorate, our estimates of the recoverability of receivables could be further adjusted.

~~Net~~Valuation ~~income~~of Inventories. ~~for~~Our ~~fiscal~~inventory ~~2002 decreased~~purchases ~~$4.9 million~~and commitments are made in order to ~~$5.9 million~~build ~~from~~inventory ~~$10.8 million~~to meet future shipment schedules based on forecasted demand for ~~fiscal~~our products. ~~2001~~Inventories ~~primarily~~are ~~due~~stated toat the ~~revenue~~lower ~~and~~of ~~expense~~cost or market, with cost being determined on the first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method. Periodically, we perform a detailed assessment of inventory, which includes a review of, among other factors, ~~discussed~~historical ~~above~~sales activity, future demand requirements, product life cycle and development plans and quality issues. Based on this

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are a holding company and receive all of our operating income from our subsidiaries. As a result, our primary source of liquidity for conducting business activities and servicing our indebtedness has been cash flows from our subsidiaries’ operating activities.

~~In September 1997~~analysis, we ~~amended~~record ~~our~~provisions ~~credit facility to allow~~ for ~~the acquisition of Argo-Tech Corporation~~potentially ~~Costa~~obsolete ~~Mesa~~or ~~and the issuance of $140.0 million of 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes. The amended credit facility consists of a seven~~slow-~~year~~moving ~~$115.0 million~~inventory term loan and a seven-year $20.0 million revolving credit facility. As of October 25, 2003, we have $25.8 million principal amount of term loans outstanding under this amended credit facility. We also have available, after $2.2 million of letters of credit, $17.8 million of the seven-year $20.0 million revolving credit facility. The unused balance of the revolving credit facility is subject to areflect ~~.75%~~inventory ~~commitment~~at ~~fee. Our credit~~net ~~facility~~realizable contains a number of covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinate indebtedness, dispose of certain assets, create liens, make capital expenditures, make certain investments or acquisitions and otherwise restrict corporate activitiesvalue. ItThese ~~also~~provisions ~~requires~~could usvary ~~to comply with certain financial ratios and tests~~significantly, ~~under which we will be required to achieve~~ ~~certain~~either ~~financial~~favorably and operating results. The credit facility contains no restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us. Interest is calculated, at our choice, using an Alternate Base Rate (“ABR”) or ~~LIBOR~~unfavorably, ~~plus a supplemental percentage determined by the ratio of total debt to EBITDA. The interest rate for fiscal year 2003 ranged~~ from ~~1.75% to~~actual ~~2.50%~~requirements ~~plus ABR or 2.75% to 3.50% plus LIBOR. On~~based ~~January 24,~~upon ~~2003~~future weeconomic ~~amended and restated our Credit Facility to allow for the re-amortization of the outstanding balance of the Term Loans~~conditions, ~~amending~~customer ~~the~~inventory ~~Consolidated~~levels ~~Interest~~or ~~Coverage~~competitive ~~Ratio~~factors ~~for~~that ~~the~~were ~~remainder~~not ~~of the agreement~~foreseen, ~~adjusting the supplemental percentage of interest applied to ABR~~ or ~~LIBOR, changing~~did ~~the commitment fee rate, increasing the Letter of Credit sublimit in the revolving credit facility to an amount~~ not ~~to exceed $5~~exist,~~000,000 and establishing a borrowing base~~ ~~covenant~~when ~~on revolving credit borrowings in excess of $10.0 million and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The maturity of~~ the ~~Term~~valuation ~~Loans~~allowances ~~was~~were ~~extended one year and is now as follows: $16~~established.~~0 million, $12.0 million and~~ ~~$13.8 million for fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005,~~ ~~respectively.~~

InValuation ~~September 1997,~~of weGoodwill ~~issued~~and Intangible ~~$140 million~~Assets. Goodwill and identified intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. ~~senior~~Intangible ~~subordinated~~assets ~~notes,~~other ~~together~~than ~~with~~goodwill aare ~~portion~~recognized if the benefit of the ~~borrowings~~intangible ~~under~~asset ~~our~~is ~~credit~~obtained through ~~facility~~contractual or other legal rights, toor ~~finance~~ if the ~~acquisition~~intangible asset ofcan ~~Argo-Tech~~be ~~Corporation~~sold, ~~Costa Mesa~~transferred, ~~repay~~licensed inor exchanged, ~~full~~regardless ~~$46.1~~of ~~million~~our inintent ~~notes~~to ~~payable~~do ~~and~~so. ~~subordinated~~Intangible ~~notes~~assets, ~~and~~such as togoodwill, ~~pay~~that ~~related~~have ~~fees~~an ~~and~~indefinite ~~expenses~~useful life are not amortized. All ~~The~~other ~~senior~~intangible ~~subordinated~~assets ~~notes~~are amortized over their estimated ~~bear~~useful ~~interest~~lives. atWe areview ~~rate~~goodwill ofand ~~8 5/8%~~purchased ~~per~~intangible ~~year~~assets for impairment annually, ~~payable~~or onwhenever ~~each~~events or changes in ~~April~~circumstances 1indicate ~~and~~the ~~October~~carrying 1.value ~~Interest~~of ~~payments~~an ~~commenced~~asset ~~on April 1,~~may ~~1998~~not be recoverable. ~~These~~Our ~~notes~~asset ~~have~~impairment ~~been~~review ~~jointly,~~assesses ~~severally,~~the fair value ~~fully~~of ~~and~~the ~~unconditionally~~assets ~~guaranteed~~based byon ~~all~~the offuture ~~our~~cash ~~wholly~~flows ~~owned~~the assets are ~~subsidiaries~~expected to generate. ~~The~~This ~~indenture~~approach ~~under~~uses ~~which~~our ~~these~~estimates ~~senior~~of future ~~subordinated~~market ~~notes~~growth, ~~were~~forecasted ~~issued~~revenue ~~contains~~and ~~certain~~costs ~~optional~~ and appropriate ~~mandatory~~discount ~~redemption~~rates. ~~features~~When ~~and~~impairment ~~other~~is ~~customary~~identified, ~~financial~~the carrying ~~covenants~~amount ~~and~~of ~~restrictions~~the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value.

OnPensions ~~December 17,~~and ~~1998,~~post-retirement ~~we issued~~plan ~~$55~~assumptions.~~0 million~~ inWe ~~principal~~have ~~amount~~two noncontributory ofdefined 8benefit ~~5/8%~~pension ~~senior~~plans for qualifying ~~subordinated~~hourly ~~notes,~~and ~~issued~~salary atemployees and a 5%postretirement ~~discount,~~health ~~due~~care benefit ~~2007,~~plan ~~$50~~for qualifying hourly retirees and their dependents.0 We account for our defined benefit plans in ~~million~~accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 87, No. 106 and No. 132, which ~~was~~requires ~~dividended~~amounts recognized in the financial statements to be ATdetermined ~~Holdings~~on an actuarial basis. ~~The~~We ~~proceeds~~are required to make ~~from~~assumptions ~~the~~regarding ~~offering,~~such ~~along~~variables ~~with~~as the ~~proceeds~~expected long-term rate of return on assets and the ~~issuance~~discount byrate, ATwhich are used ~~Holdings~~to ofdetermine ~~30,000~~service ~~shares~~cost ofand ~~its~~interest ~~preferred~~cost ~~stock~~to arrive at pension income or expense for the year. We are also required to Jmake assumptions for the long-term health care cost trend rates for our post-retirement benefit plan.P. ~~Morgan~~The estimated cost and ~~Partners,~~benefits ~~LLC~~of the noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and ~~cash~~the onpostretirement ~~hand~~health care plan are determined by an independent actuary using various actuarial assumptions, including, ~~were~~but ~~used~~not limited to, ~~repurchase~~assumptions ~~639~~on demographic factors such as retirement,~~510~~ mortality and turnover. We have ~~shares~~analyzed the rate of ~~stock~~return ~~from~~on ATassets ~~Holdings,~~used ~~LLC,~~and determined that this rate is reasonable based on the ~~Company~~plans’s historical ~~largest~~performance ~~shareholder,~~relative ~~for~~to ~~$79~~the overall markets.~~4 million~~ ~~plus~~The ~~transaction~~discount rate assumption is consistent with prior years and is based on changes in the prevailing market long-term interest rates at the measurement date. If any of our assumptions were to change, our benefit plan expenses would also change. AtAn ~~October 25~~increase/decrease in the discount rate, ~~2003~~assuming no other changes in the ~~accreted~~estimates, reduces/increases ~~value~~the amount of ~~this~~the accumulated benefit ~~offering~~obligation ~~was~~and ~~$53~~the related required expense.5 A detailed discussion of Argo-Tech’s pensions and post-retirement plans can be found in Note ~~million~~10 to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

~~Argo-Tech~~Results ~~does~~of ~~not enter into derivative~~operations ~~contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We have no other~~ ~~derivative financial instruments.~~

~~Cash~~The ~~Flows~~following ~~from~~table ~~Operating Activities.~~presents, ~~Cash provided by operating activities~~ for ~~fiscal~~the ~~2003 decreased $15.0 million to~~periods ~~$15.7 million~~indicated, ~~primarily~~selected asitems ~~a result of an increase~~ in ~~receivables~~ ~~and~~our ~~inventory.~~consolidated ~~Cash~~statements ~~provided by operating activities~~of ~~for~~income ~~fiscal 2002 increased $12.6 million to $30.7 million primarily~~ as a ~~result~~percentage of anet ~~decrease in receivables and inventory~~revenues.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $1.9 million, $1.8 million and $1.9 million for fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, for expenditures for the purchase of property, plant and equipment. These expenditures reflect a normal amount of capital investments necessary to maintain our efficiency and manufacturing capabilities.



	Fiscal Year Ended

	October 30, 2004			October 25, 2003			October 26, 2002

Net revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Gross profit		41.7	%		41.2	%		42.9	%
Operating expenses		24.8	%		24.5	%		25.0	%
Income from operations		16.9	%		16.7	%		17.9	%
Interest expense		12.1	%		13.2	%		13.7	%
Debt extinguishment expense		6.9	%		—			—
Other, net		—			(0.3	)%		—
Income (loss) before income taxes		(2.1	)%		3.8	%		4.2	%
Income tax provision (benefit)		(1.9	)%		1.0	%		0.4	%
Net income (loss)		(0.2	)%		2.8	%		3.8	%

Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2003 was $17.4 million, which was primarily used to make scheduled repayments of long-term debt and payment of financing related fees associated with amending our credit agreement. Cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2002 was $19.2 million, which was primarily used to make scheduled repayments of long-term debt and for AT Holdings’ repurchase of common stock from various former employees. Cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2001

~~was~~Export ~~$13.3 million, which was primarily used~~sales ~~to make scheduled repayments of long-term debt and for AT~~ ~~Holdings’ repurchase of common stock from various former employees.~~

~~Capital~~Substantially all of our export sales are ~~Expenditures~~denominated in U.S. dollars. ~~Our~~Export ~~capital~~sales ~~expenditures~~ for fiscal years 2004, 2003, ~~totaled~~and 2002 were $180.92 million, ~~which were related to~~$66.7 million ~~maintaining existing facilities~~ and ~~equipment~~$68.6 million, ~~and~~respectively. ~~systems~~Sales to ~~support~~ ~~current~~Europe ~~operating~~for ~~activities. For~~ fiscal years 2004, ~~we estimate~~2003 ~~that~~and ~~capital~~2002 ~~expenditures~~were ~~will~~$32.8 million, $30.4 million ~~total~~and $328.0 million, respectively. ~~The~~ ~~majority of these projects will be for continued maintenance~~Export ofsales ~~facilities~~to ~~and~~all ~~equipment~~other inregions, ~~support~~individually ofless ~~our~~than ~~current~~10%, ~~operating~~were ~~activities~~$47.4 million, ~~Capital~~$36.3 million ~~expenditures~~and ~~are financed with cash~~$40.6 million ~~generated~~for ~~from~~fiscal ~~operations.~~years We2004, ~~currently~~2003 ~~have~~and no2002, ~~material commitments for capital expenditures~~respectively.

~~Our~~Fiscal ~~expected~~2004 ~~future~~compared ~~contractual~~with ~~cash obligations~~fiscal ~~and other commercial commitments for the next five years are as~~2003 ~~follows:~~

	2004		2005		2006		2007		2008
Contractual Obligations:
Long Term Debt	$	12.0	$	13.8	$		$	195.0	$
Operating Leases		0.9		0.7		0.4		0.1		0.1
Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	12.9	$	14.5	$	0.4	$	195.1	$	0.1

Net revenues for fiscal 2004 increased $26.6 million, or 16.6%, to $187.3 million from $160.7 million for fiscal 2003. This change was due to an increase in aerospace revenues of $16.9 million and a $9.7 million increase in industrial revenues. The increase in aerospace revenues was attributable to an increase of $10.9 million in commercial revenues and an increase of $6.0 million in military revenues. Commercial OEM revenues increased $2.3 million, or 11.4% to $22.5 million and commercial aftermarket revenues increased $8.6 million, or 15.3% to $64.9 million. Commercial OEM revenues increased primarily as a result of an increase in pump requirements from our customers. Commercial aftermarket revenues increased primarily due to increases in repair and overhaul services and demand for spare parts. Military revenues increased primarily due to revenue related to increased sales on a variety of OEM and aftermarket main engine fuel pumps and components as well as an increase in revenues related to airframe components on various OEM and OEM development programs, partially offset by a decrease in aftermarket revenues related to airframe components. Industrial revenues increased $9.7 million, primarily attributable to an increase of $8.0 million in ground fueling revenues, of which $6.2 million was attributable to military sales, and $1.9 million in cryogenic pump revenues, offset by a slight decrease in business park revenues. Approximately 42.8% of fiscal 2004 net revenues were attributable to export sales to foreign customers compared to 41.5% in fiscal 2003. Substantially all such sales were denominated in U.S. dollars.

WeAerospace ~~believe~~gross ~~that~~profit ~~cash~~for ~~flow~~fiscal ~~from~~2004 ~~operations will~~increased ~~provide~~$9.8 million, ~~adequate~~or ~~funds~~18.3%, to $63.3 million from $53.5 million for ~~our~~fiscal ~~working~~2003. ~~capital~~Gross ~~needs,~~margin ~~planned~~increased to ~~capital~~45.8% ~~expenditures~~for ~~and~~fiscal ~~debt~~2004 ~~service~~from ~~obligations~~44.2% ~~Our~~for ~~ability~~fiscal 2003. The increase in gross profit and gross margin is primarily attributable to ~~fund~~an increase ~~our~~in ~~operations,~~higher ~~make~~margin ~~planned~~commercial ~~capital~~aerospace ~~expenditures~~aftermarket revenues, an increase in military revenues and to ~~make~~an ~~scheduled~~increase ~~payments~~in operating onefficiencies at both our ~~indebtedness~~Cleveland ~~depends~~and onCosta ~~our~~Mesa ~~future~~facilities, ~~operating~~partially ~~performance~~offset ~~and~~by an increase in non-cash ~~flow~~costs associated with ESOP compensation. WeIndustrial ~~may~~gross ~~need~~profit tofor ~~refinance~~fiscal ~~all~~2004 increased $2.2 million or a16.9% ~~portion~~to $15.2 million offrom ~~our~~$13.0 million ~~indebtedness~~in onfiscal or2003. ~~before~~The ~~maturity.~~increase ~~There~~in ~~can~~gross beprofit nowas ~~assurance~~attributable ~~that~~to wean ~~will~~increase bein ground ~~able~~fueling torevenues partially offset by a decrease in ~~refinance~~cryogenic ~~any~~gross ofprofit, ~~our~~attributable ~~indebtedness~~to onan ~~commercially~~increase ~~reasonable~~in ~~terms~~manufacturing orcosts. atGross ~~all~~margin decreased to 30.9% ~~These~~in ~~items~~fiscal 2004 ~~are~~from ~~subject~~33.0% in fiscal 2003 primarily attributable to ~~prevailing~~an ~~conditions~~increase ~~and~~in tomanufacturing ~~financial,~~costs ~~business,~~for ~~and~~our ~~other~~cryogenic ~~factors,~~pump ~~some~~products ofpartially ~~which~~offset ~~are~~by ~~beyond~~a ~~our~~favorable ~~control~~sales mix of ground fueling products.

~~New~~Operating ~~Accounting~~expenses ~~Standards~~for fiscal 2004 increased $7.1 million, or 18.0%, to $46.5 million from $39.4 million in fiscal 2003. The increase is primarily due to an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $4.7 million and research and development expenses of $2.4 million. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $4.7 million was related to increased non-cash costs associated with ESOP compensation, increased incentive compensation and increased marketing costs, including commissions and royalties. The increase in research and development expenses is primarily due to a decrease in customer paid development expenses. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 24.8% for fiscal 2004 from 24.5% in fiscal 2003.

InIncome ~~June 2002,~~from ~~the~~operations ~~FASB~~for ~~issued~~fiscal ~~Statement~~2004 ofincreased ~~Financial~~$4.8 million, ~~Accounting~~or ~~Standard~~17.9%, ~~(“SFAS”)~~to No$31.6 ~~146,~~million from ~~“Accounting~~$26.8 million ~~for~~in ~~Costs~~fiscal ~~Associated~~2003. ~~with~~As ~~Exit~~a orpercent ~~Disposal~~of revenues, ~~Activities.”~~income ~~This~~from ~~statement~~operations ~~requires~~for ~~that~~fiscal a2004 ~~liability~~increased ~~for~~to a16.9% from ~~cost~~16.7% ~~associated~~in ~~with~~fiscal an2003. ~~exit~~These orincreases ~~disposal~~were ~~activity~~primarily bedue ~~recognized~~to ~~when~~increased ~~the~~sales ~~liability~~of ishigher ~~incurred.~~margin ~~The~~commercial ~~provisions~~aerospace aftermarket ofrevenues, ~~this~~an ~~statement are~~increase ~~effective~~in ~~for~~military ~~exit~~revenues orand ~~disposal~~an increase ~~activities~~in ~~that~~ground ~~are~~fueling ~~initiated after December 31~~revenues, ~~2002.~~partially ~~Management~~offset ~~determined~~by ~~the adoption~~an ofincrease ~~this~~in ~~statement~~cryogenic ~~had~~pump nomanufacturing ~~effect~~costs onand ~~Argo-Tech’s consolidated~~higher ~~financial~~operating ~~statements~~expenses.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” FIN 45 requires that a liability be recorded in the guarantor’s balance sheet upon issuance of a guarantee. In addition, FIN 45 requires disclosures about the guarantees that an entity has issued, including a rollforward of the entity’s product warranty liabilities. See Note 9 for this disclosure. Argo-Tech will apply the recognition provisions of FIN 45 prospectively to guarantees issued after December 31, 2002. Argo-Tech has not guaranteed any other obligation before or after December 31, 2002 that would require disclosure under FIN 45.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 provides guidance on how to identify a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and determine when the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and results of operations of a VIE need to be included in a company’s consolidated financial statements. FIN 46 also requires additional disclosures by primary beneficiaries and other significant variable interest holders. The provisions of this interpretation became effective upon issuance. Management believes the adoption of this interpretation is not likely to have a material impact on Argo-Tech’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.” This statement establishes how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify certain financial instruments (as identified in the scope of the statement), as a liability (or an asset in some

~~circumstances),~~Interest ~~that~~expense ~~were~~for ~~previously~~fiscal ~~classified~~2004 increased as$1.5 million, ~~equity~~or 7.1%, ~~Management~~to ~~determined~~$22.7 million ~~the~~from $21.2 million ~~adoption~~in offiscal ~~this~~2003 ~~statement~~due to a higher outstanding ~~had~~borrowing noand ~~effect~~interest rate on ~~Argo-Tech’s~~our ~~consolidated~~$250.0 million ~~financial~~9 ~~statements~~1/4% senior notes issued in June 2004 which was partially offset by lower outstanding borrowing and interest rates on our credit facility.

~~Risk~~Debt ~~Factors~~extinguishment expense of $12.9 million was incurred in fiscal 2004. The expense is for the write-off of $6.1 million of deferred financing fees associated with the refinancing of our 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes and the amendment and restatement of our credit agreement, $5.5 million for the tender, consent and redemption fees associated with the refinancing of the 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes and recognition of the remaining accretion of $1.3 million on a portion of the 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes that were issued at a discount.

~~From~~The ~~time~~income totax ~~time,~~benefit ~~information~~was we$3.5 million ~~provide,~~for ~~statements~~fiscal by2004 ~~our~~as ~~employees~~compared orto ~~information~~a ~~included~~provision inof ~~our~~$1.6 million in ~~filings~~fiscal ~~with~~2003. ~~the~~This ~~Securities~~decrease ~~and~~in ~~Exchange~~income ~~Commission~~tax ~~(including those~~is ~~portions~~primarily ofdue ~~the~~to ~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis~~a ~~that~~decrease ~~refer~~in ~~to the future) may contain forward~~pre-~~looking~~tax ~~statements that~~income ~~are~~and ~~not~~a ~~historical~~lower ~~facts.~~estimated ~~Those~~effective ~~statements are~~tax ~~“forward-looking”~~rate ~~within~~in the ~~meaning~~current ofyear ~~the~~due ~~Private Securities~~to ~~Litigation~~the ~~Reform~~debt ~~Act of 1995~~extinguishment expenses. ~~Such~~A ~~forward-looking statements,~~reconciliation ~~and~~of ~~our~~the ~~future~~income ~~performance,~~tax ~~operating~~provision ~~results,~~can be ~~financial~~found ~~position~~in ~~and~~Note 11 ~~liquidity, are subject~~ to athe ~~variety~~audited ofconsolidated financial ~~factors~~statements ~~that~~included ~~could~~elsewhere ~~materially~~in ~~affect~~this ~~results, including:~~report.

~~Risks~~Net ~~Associated~~income ~~with~~for ~~the~~fiscal ~~Aerospace~~2004 ~~Industry~~decreased ~~Generally~~$5.0 million to a loss of $0.5 million from income of $4.5 million in fiscal 2003, primarily due to the revenue and expense factors discussed above.

• Fiscal ~~The~~2003 ~~aerospace~~compared ~~industry~~with ~~is cyclical.~~fiscal 2002

~~The~~Net ~~majority~~revenues offor ~~our~~ fiscal 2003 ~~gross~~increased $5.4 million, ~~profit~~or ~~and~~3.5%, to $160.7 million from ~~operating~~$155.3 million ~~income~~for ~~was~~fiscal ~~derived~~2002. ~~from~~This ~~sales~~change ofwas ~~products~~due to ~~the~~an increase in aerospace ~~industry~~revenues of $0.3 million ~~The~~and ~~commercial~~a $5.1 million ~~aerospace~~increase ~~industry~~in ~~is cyclical~~industrial ~~and~~revenues. ~~has~~The ~~historically~~increase in ~~been~~aerospace ~~subject~~revenues was attributable to ~~fluctuations~~an ~~due~~increase of to$9.8 million ~~general~~in ~~economic~~military ~~conditions~~revenues ~~and~~offset ~~incidents~~by a decrease of $9.5 million Onin commercial revenues. Commercial OEM ~~September~~revenues decreased $0.6 11million, ~~2001~~or 2.9%, ~~the~~to $20.2 million ~~United~~and ~~States~~commercial ~~was~~aftermarket ~~subjected~~revenues decreased $8.9 million, or 13.7%, to $56.3 million. Commercial ~~terrorist~~OEM ~~attacks~~revenues ~~which~~declined ~~involved~~as ~~the~~a ~~hijacking~~result of ~~four~~lower ~~U.S.~~overall engine ~~commercial~~requirements from our customers in response to decreasing aircraft build rates. InCommercial ~~the~~aftermarket ~~aftermath~~revenues ofwere lower primarily due to a decrease in the ~~terrorist~~demand ~~attacks,~~for spare part sales ~~passenger~~and ~~traffic~~repair onand ~~commercial~~overhaul ~~flights~~activities. ~~has~~The ~~been~~lower ~~significantly~~demand for ~~lower~~aftermarket ~~than~~sales ~~prior~~and toactivities is a result of the ~~attacks.~~reduced flying ~~Most~~by commercial airlines, the availability of spare parts ~~reduced~~taken ~~their~~from ~~operating~~parked ~~schedules~~aircraft and ~~lowered~~deferral ~~fares~~of maintenance. Military ~~Consequently,~~revenues ~~fewer~~increased ~~people~~primarily ~~are~~due ~~flying~~to revenue related to increased sales on a variety of OEM and ~~those~~aftermarket ~~who~~aerial ~~are~~refueling components, ~~flying~~main engine fuel pump and airframe components, as ~~are~~well ~~paying~~as ~~less~~an increase in revenues related to doairframe socomponents on various OEM development programs. ~~The~~Industrial ~~overall~~revenues increased ~~result~~$5.1 million, ~~has~~primarily ~~been~~due ~~large~~to ~~and~~an increase in ~~continuing~~ground ~~financial~~fueling ~~losses~~and cryogenic pump revenues offset by a decrease in ~~the~~industrial ~~airline~~gas ~~industry~~turbine revenues. ~~Major~~Approximately 41.5% of ~~carriers~~fiscal ~~around~~2003 net ~~the~~revenues ~~world~~were ~~have~~attributable ~~filed~~to ~~for~~export ~~bankruptcy~~sales to foreign customers compared to 44.2% in fiscal 2002. Substantially all such sales were denominated in U.S. dollars.

~~The~~Aerospace ~~future~~gross ~~impact~~profit offor ~~these~~fiscal ~~events~~2003 isdecreased $1.4 million, ~~impossible~~or 2.6%, to $53.5 million from $54.9 million for fiscal 2002. Gross margin decreased to 44.2% ~~fully~~for ~~evaluate~~fiscal 2003 from 45.4% ~~Continuing~~for ~~losses~~fiscal 2002. The decrease in ~~the~~gross ~~airline~~profit ~~industry~~and gross margin is primarily attributable to a ~~have~~decrease ~~resulted,~~in higher margin commercial aerospace aftermarket revenues and ~~will~~an ~~continue~~increase toin ~~result,~~non-cash ESOP compensation expense partially offset by an increase in ~~reduced~~military ~~orders~~revenues and a change in classification and ~~delivery~~allocation ~~delays~~of $2.1 million of certain ~~new~~costs ~~commercial~~to ~~aircraft~~selling, ~~retirement~~general ofand administrative expenses. ~~older~~Industrial ~~aircraft~~gross ~~(eliminating~~profit ~~those~~for ~~aircraft~~fiscal ~~from~~2003 ~~maintenance~~increased ~~needs~~$0.6 million, ~~and~~or ~~making~~4.8%, ~~spare~~to ~~parts~~$13.0 million from $12.4 million ~~those~~in ~~aircraft~~fiscal ~~available),~~2002. ~~and~~The increase in gross profit ~~delays~~was attributable to an increase in ~~airlines’~~ground ~~purchases~~fueling revenues partially offset by an increase in utility costs associated with the operation of ~~aftermarket~~our ~~parts~~business aspark and a decrease in industrial ~~maintenance~~gas isturbine ~~deferred~~revenues. ~~This~~Gross ~~could~~margin, ~~continue~~which decreased to ~~result~~33.0% in ~~decreases~~fiscal in2003 ~~our~~from ~~Aerospace~~36.1% ~~segment~~in ~~sales~~fiscal of2002, ~~OEM~~was ~~and~~lower ~~aftermarket~~primarily due ~~components~~to ~~and~~the ~~negatively~~increase ~~affect~~in ~~our~~utility ~~income~~costs, an unfavorable sales mix of ground fueling products and ~~cash~~an ~~flow~~increase in cryogenic pump manufacturing costs.

• Operating ~~The~~expenses ~~aerospace~~for ~~industry~~fiscal is2003 ~~subject~~increased $0.6 million, or 1.5%, to ~~government~~$39.4 million ~~regulation~~from $38.8 million in fiscal 2002. Selling, general and administrative ~~oversight~~expenses increased $3.0 million due to a $2.1 million change in classification and allocation of certain costs from cost of sales, an increase in marketing costs, bid and proposal costs, legal costs, severance costs associated with a reduction in the salaried workforce and an increase in non-cash ESOP compensation expense offset by the non-recurrence of a non-cash expense of $0.6 million related to a salaried employee early retirement program in fiscal 2002. Research and development expenses decreased $2.2 million due to an increase in customer paid development expenses, which are included in cost of revenues,

The aerospace industry is highly regulated in the United States and in other countries. We must be certified or accepted by the Federal Aviation Administration, the U.S. Department of Defense and similar agencies in foreign countries and by individual OEMs in order to sell and service parts and components used in specific aircraft models. If material certifications, authorizations or approvals were revoked or suspended, our operations would be adversely affected. In the future, new and more demanding government regulations may be adopted or industry oversight may be increased, which may have an adverse effect on our profitability.

• The aerospace industry is highly competitive.

The aerospace industry is a highly competitive global industry which has experienced significant consolidation in recent years. Our competitors are typically divisions of large corporations that have significantly greater financial resources than we do.

• There are a limited number of customers for certain products.

Due to the relatively small number of customers in the aerospace industry, customers, particularly OEM customers, are often able to influence prices and other terms of sale for certain of our products. This influence can have a material adverse effect on our profitability, as would the loss of one or more of these significant customers.

• Government Contracts are subject to reductions in defense spending.

Approximately 37% of our sales in fiscal 2003 were related to U.S. designed military products. In addition, foreign military sales are affected by U.S. government regulations, regulations by the purchasing foreign government and political uncertainties in the U.S. and abroad. The U.S. defense budget has fluctuated in recent years. Although we have experienced increased sales as a result of military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, there

~~can~~and bea nodecrease ~~assurance~~in ~~that~~spending ~~the U.S. defense budget will not decline or that sales of defense~~ related ~~items~~ to programs ~~foreign~~nearing ~~governments~~completion. ~~will~~Operating ~~continue~~expenses atas ~~present~~a ~~levels.~~percent ~~In addition, the terms~~ of ~~defense contracts with the U.S.~~revenues ~~government~~decreased ~~generally permit the government~~ to ~~terminate contracts,~~24.5% ~~with~~for orfiscal ~~without~~2003 ~~cause,~~from ~~at any time~~25.0% ~~Any~~in ~~unexpected termination~~fiscal ~~of a significant government contract could have an adverse effect on our business and profitability~~2002.

~~Risks~~Income ~~Associated~~from operations for fiscal 2003 decreased $1.0 million, or 3.6%, to $26.8 million from $27.8 million in fiscal 2002. As a percent of revenues, income from operations for fiscal 2003 decreased to 16.7% from 17.9% in fiscal 2002. These decreases were primarily due to the decrease in higher margin commercial aerospace aftermarket revenues partially offset by an increase in military and industrial revenues, an increase in utility costs associated with the operation of our business park and an increase in ~~Operations~~selling, general and administrative expenses offset by a decrease in research and development expenses discussed above.

• Interest ~~Our~~expense ~~substantial~~for ~~indebtedness~~fiscal ~~could~~2003 ~~adversely~~decreased $0.2 million, ~~affect~~or 0.9%, to $21.2 million from $21.4 million for fiscal 2002 due to lower outstanding borrowings which were partially offset by an increase in interest rates on the term loans under our ~~financial~~credit ~~health~~facility and increased amortization of deferred financing fees resulting from the amendment of that credit facility in January 2003.

WeThe ~~have~~income atax ~~significant~~provision ~~amount~~for offiscal ~~indebtedness. Our~~2003 ~~ability~~increased to$1.0 million ~~generate cash in the future, is,~~ to a$1.6 million ~~certain extent,~~from ~~subject~~$0.6 million toin ~~general~~fiscal ~~economic,~~2002. ~~financial,~~A ~~competitive, legislative,~~reconciliation ~~regulatory~~of ~~and~~the ~~other factors that are beyond our~~income ~~control.~~tax ~~The~~provision ~~balance~~can ~~between~~be ~~our~~found ~~ability~~in Note 11 to ~~generate~~the ~~cash and~~audited ~~our~~consolidated ~~substantial~~financial ~~indebtedness~~statements ~~could~~included ~~have~~elsewhere ~~important~~in ~~consequences~~this report. ~~For example, it could:~~

• Net ~~increase~~income ~~our~~for ~~vulnerability~~fiscal to2003 ~~general~~decreased $1.4 million ~~adverse economic and industry conditions, • limit our ability~~ to ~~fund~~$4.5 million ~~future~~from working capital, capital expenditures, research and development costs and other general corporate requirements, • require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development efforts and other general corporate purposes, • limit our flexibility in planning $5.9 million for, orfiscal ~~reacting~~2002 ~~to,~~primarily ~~changes~~due ~~in our business and the industry in which we operate, • place us at a competitive disadvantage compared~~ to ~~our competitors that have less debt, and • limit, along with~~ the ~~financial~~revenue and ~~other~~expense ~~restrictive~~factors discussed ~~covenants in our indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds~~above.

~~Based~~Liquidity ~~upon the current level of operations~~ and ~~absent~~ ~~any~~capital ~~unanticipated disruptive events, we believe our cash~~resources ~~flow from operations and available cash, together with available~~ ~~borrowings under our $20.0 million revolving credit facility, will be fully adequate to meet our future liquidity needs. This cannot be assured, however.~~

• We ~~depend~~are ona ~~the~~holding ~~skill~~company ~~and~~that ~~experience~~receives all of our operating ~~senior~~income ~~executives~~from our subsidiaries. As a result, our primary source of liquidity for conducting business activities and servicing our indebtedness has been cash flows from our subsidiaries’ operating activities.

~~Our~~Argo-Tech ~~success~~has ~~depends~~a ~~upon~~$15.0 million five-year Term Loan Facility and has available a five-year $30.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The unused balance of the ~~efforts,~~Revolving ~~abilities~~Credit Facility ($24.2 million at October 30, 2004 after reduction of $5.8 million for ~~experience~~letters of credit) is subject to a .50% commitment fee. The Credit Facility and ~~expertise~~Term Loan mature on June 23, 2009. The Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the tangible ~~executive~~assets ~~officers~~of Argo-Tech (including the capital stock of ~~our~~AT Holdings). ~~senior~~The Credit Facility contains a number of covenants ~~management~~that, ~~team~~among other things, limit Argo-Tech’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated indebtedness, dispose of certain assets, create liens, make capital expenditures, make certain investments or acquisitions and otherwise restrict corporate activities. The Credit ~~loss~~Facility ofcontains ~~services~~no restrictions on the ability of Argo-Tech’s ~~those~~subsidiaries ~~individuals~~to make distributions to Argo-Tech. The Credit Facility also requires Argo-Tech to comply with certain financial ratios and tests, under which Argo-Tech oris ~~other~~required ~~key~~to ~~employees~~achieve ~~could~~certain ~~have~~financial and operating results. Argo-Tech was in compliance with the covenants at October 30, 2004. Interest was calculated, at Argo-Tech’s choice, using an alternate base rate (ABR) or LIBOR, plus a ~~material~~supplemental ~~adverse~~percentage ~~effect~~determined by onthe ratio of debt to adjusted EBITDA. The interest rate for ~~our~~fiscal ~~company~~year 2004 ranged from 1.00% to 2.50% plus ABR or 2.50% to 3.50% plus LIBOR.

• At ~~Our~~October 25, ~~operations~~2003, ~~depend~~Argo-Tech had a $115.0 million principal amount of Term Loans ($25.9 million remaining balance) and a seven-year $20.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Credit Facility and Term Loans were to mature on ~~maintaining~~October 28, 2005. On June 23, 2004, Argo-Tech amended and restated the Credit Facility and Term Loans into a ~~skilled~~$15.0 million ~~workforce~~five-year Term Loan Facility and a five-year $30.0 million Revolving Credit Facility.

~~Our~~At ~~operations~~October 30, ~~are~~2004, ~~highly~~Argo-Tech ~~dependent on an~~had ~~educated~~outstanding ~~and trained workforce~~$250.0 million ~~All~~9 of1/4% Senior ~~our~~Notes ~~hourly employees at~~due ~~the~~2011. ~~Cleveland~~Interest ~~facility~~on ~~are~~the ~~represented~~Notes byis ~~the~~payable ~~United~~semiannually ~~Auto~~on ~~Workers~~June 1 ~~union~~and ~~under~~December 1 aof ~~collective~~each ~~bargaining~~year. ~~agreement~~The ~~that~~Senior Notes ~~expires~~will ~~March~~mature on June 311, ~~2004~~2011. ~~Because~~The weSenior ~~maintain~~Notes aare ~~relatively~~unsecured ~~small~~and ~~inventory~~rank ofequally ~~finished~~with ~~goods,~~all our existing and ~~because~~future ~~the~~senior ~~aerospace~~debt ~~industry~~and ~~operates~~rank onsenior ~~relatively~~to ~~long~~all ~~production~~our ~~lead~~existing ~~times,~~and ~~any~~future subordinated ~~interruption~~debt. ofThe ~~the~~Senior ~~work~~Notes ~~force~~will ~~due~~be toeffectively ~~strikes,~~subordinated ~~work~~to ~~stoppages,~~all ~~shortages~~our ofexisting ~~appropriately~~and ~~skilled~~future ~~production~~secured ~~and~~debt ~~professional~~to the extent of the value ~~workers~~of orthe ~~other~~assets ~~interruption~~securing ~~could~~such ~~have~~debt. aThe ~~material~~Senior ~~adverse effect~~Notes onare ~~our~~subject to ~~business~~certain limitations and ~~results~~restrictions ofwhich ~~operations~~Argo-Tech has not exceeded at October 30, 2004.

• We depend on suppliers for essential materials used in our products.

Our profitability is affected by the price and continuity of supply of raw materials and component parts. Like all other aerospace fuel pump manufacturers, we rely on one supplier for CPM-10V, a powdered metal used in the manufacture of certain pump components. If that supply ceased to exist, our ability to operate would be adversely affected. We could also be adversely affected by factors affecting our suppliers, or by increased costs associated with supplied materials or components if we are unable to make corresponding increases in the prices of our products. We maintain a relatively small inventory of raw materials and component parts and could be adversely affected by a reduction of supply from vendors. Although we believe that alternative suppliers, or

~~alternate~~At ~~materials~~October 25, ~~or components~~2003, ~~could~~Argo-Tech behad ~~identified,~~outstanding ~~the~~$195.0 million ~~lengthy~~8 ~~and~~5/8% Senior ~~expensive~~Subordinated Notes ~~FAA~~due ~~and~~2007 ~~OEM~~(the ~~certification~~“Notes”). The accreted value of ~~process~~the ~~associated~~Notes ~~with~~was ~~aerospace~~$193.5 million. ~~products~~Interest ~~could~~on ~~prevent~~the Notes is ~~efficient~~payable ~~replacement~~semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of aeach year. ~~material~~In orJune ~~supplier~~2004, ~~and~~Argo-Tech ~~could~~purchased, ~~have~~through a tender offer ~~material~~and ~~adverse~~redemption, ~~effect~~its onoutstanding ~~our~~$195.0 million ~~business~~8 5/8% Notes due 2007, together with a premium of $5.5 million and ~~profitability~~accrued and unpaid interest of $4.0 million.

• As Wea ~~depend~~result of the Refinancing, long-term debt at October 30, 2004 consisted of $14.8 million principal amount of term loans and $250.0 million principal amount of senior notes. Scheduled payments of $6.2 million were made on ~~our~~the ~~Cleveland~~term loans in fiscal 2004. At October 30, ~~Ohio~~2004, there were no outstanding borrowings on the revolving credit facility, and ~~Costa~~we ~~Mesa~~had available, ~~California~~after ~~facilities~~$5.8 million in letters of credit, $24.2 million under our revolving credit facility. In January 2005, we amended our Credit Facility to increase the available letters of credit from $7.5 million to $12.0 million and to allow additional banks within the lending group to issue letters of credit.

WeCash ~~believe~~and ~~that~~cash ~~our~~equivalents ~~success~~for tofiscal ~~date~~year ~~has~~2004 increased ~~been,~~$1.8 million ~~and future~~to ~~results~~$15.9 million. ofThe ~~operations~~increase was ~~will~~primarily ~~be,~~due ~~dependent~~to incash ~~large~~provided ~~part~~by operating activities, ~~upon~~partially ~~our~~offset ~~ability~~by toour ~~manufacture~~issuance ~~and~~of ~~deliver~~$250.0 million ~~products~~of ~~promptly~~9 ~~upon~~1/4% senior ~~receipt~~notes ofdue ~~orders~~2011, amendment and torestatement ~~provide~~of our ~~prompt~~senior credit facility and ~~efficient service~~related totransactions ~~our~~and ~~customers~~capital expenditures. AsThe aproceeds ~~result,~~from ~~any~~the ~~disruption~~offering of ~~our~~the senior ~~day-to-day~~notes, ~~operations~~together ~~could~~with ~~have~~cash aon ~~material~~hand ~~adverse~~and ~~effect~~borrowings onof ~~our~~$15.0 million ~~business,~~under ~~customer~~our ~~relations~~amended and ~~profitability.~~restated ~~The~~senior credit ~~Cleveland~~facility, ~~Ohio~~were ~~and~~used ~~Costa~~to: ~~Mesa~~purchase, ~~California~~through ~~facilities~~a ~~are~~tender ~~the primary~~offer ~~production, research~~ and ~~marketing~~a redemption, ~~facilities~~all ~~for~~of our ~~products~~ ~~and~~outstanding ~~the~~$195.0 million ~~Cleveland~~8 5/8% senior ~~facility~~subordinated ~~also~~notes ~~serves~~due as2007; ~~our~~dividend ~~corporate~~to AT ~~headquarters~~Holdings $57.6 million Afor ~~fire,~~the ~~flood,~~redemption ~~earthquake~~of orall ~~other~~of ~~disaster~~AT Holdings’ oroutstanding Series A Cumulative Exchangeable ~~condition~~Redeemable ~~affecting~~Preferred ~~either~~Stock ofat ~~these~~100% ~~facilities~~of ~~could~~its ~~disable~~$30.0 million ~~these~~liquidation ~~functions~~preference, ~~which~~together ~~are~~with ~~critical~~accrued toand ~~our~~unpaid dividends ~~business~~of $27.6 million; ~~Any~~repay ~~such~~$19.8 million of ~~damage~~term ~~to,~~loans oroutstanding ~~other~~under ~~condition~~our ~~interfering~~existing ~~with~~senior ~~the~~credit facility; ~~operation~~and pay transaction fees and expenses of, approximately ~~these~~$7.5 million. ~~facilities~~Prior ~~would~~to ~~have~~the aamendment ~~material~~and ~~adverse~~restatement ~~effect~~of on our ~~business~~senior credit facility, ~~financial~~$6.0 million ~~position~~of ~~and~~scheduled ~~results~~payments had ofbeen ~~operations~~made.

• Cash WeFlows ~~have~~from ~~potential~~Operating Activities. ~~exposure~~Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2004 increased $17.5 million, to $33.2 million, ~~environmental~~from $15.7 million in fiscal 2003 primarily as a result of an increase in income from operations and a net favorable change in operating assets and liabilities. Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2003 decreased $15.0 million to $15.7 million primarily as a result of an increase in receivables and inventory. Cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2002 increased $12.6 million to $30.7 million primarily as a result of a decrease in receivables and inventory.

~~Our~~Cash ~~business~~Used ~~operations~~In ~~and facilities are~~Investing ~~subject~~Activities. toNet acash ~~number~~used ofin ~~federal,~~investing activities ~~state~~was ~~and local laws and regulations~~$3.1 million, ~~which~~$1.9 million ~~govern the discharge of pollutants~~ and ~~hazardous~~$1.8 million ~~substances~~for ~~into~~fiscal ~~the~~years ~~air and water as well as the handling~~2004, ~~storage~~2003 and ~~disposal of such materials. Under certain environmental laws~~2002, ~~as a current or previous owner or operator~~ ~~of real property~~respectively, wefor ~~could~~expenditures ~~be held liable~~ for the ~~costs~~purchase of property, ~~removal~~plant orand ~~remediation of hazardous substances found on the property~~equipment. ~~Environmental~~These ~~laws~~expenditures ~~typically~~reflect ~~impose~~a ~~liability~~normal ~~whether~~amount orof ~~not~~capital ~~the~~investments ~~owner~~necessary orto ~~operator~~maintain ~~knew~~our ~~of,~~efficiency ~~or was responsible for,~~and ~~the~~manufacturing ~~presence of such hazardous substances~~capabilities.

~~Our~~Cash ~~Cleveland~~Flows ~~and~~from ~~Costa~~Financing Activities. ~~Mesa~~Cash ~~facilities~~used ~~are~~in financing ~~currently~~activities ~~the~~for ~~subject~~fiscal of2004 ~~environmental~~was ~~remediation~~$28.4 million, ~~regarding~~primarily as ~~contamination~~a ~~resulting~~result ~~from~~of the ~~operations~~issuance of ~~our predecessors~~$250. ~~Those~~0 million ~~predecessors~~of ~~have~~senior ~~indemnified~~notes, offset usby ~~for~~our ~~substantially~~Refinancing ~~all~~transactions. These transactions ~~costs~~included (i) the purchase of ~~remediation~~$195 million atof ~~each~~our ~~site.~~8 5/8% senior ~~There~~subordinated ~~can~~notes, be(ii) a nodividend ~~assurance,~~to AT ~~however~~Holdings, ~~that~~our ~~those~~parent ~~parties~~company, ~~will~~for ~~continue~~the toredemption ~~satisfy~~of ~~their~~all of AT ~~indemnification~~Holdings’ ~~obligations~~outstanding orSeries A ~~that~~Cumulative weExchangeable Redeemable ~~would~~Preferred ~~not~~Stock, be(iii) scheduled ~~ultimately~~repayments and ~~responsible~~the asrestatement ~~owner~~of our credit facility and~~/or~~ ~~operator~~(iv) payment of transaction ~~either~~fees orand ~~both~~expenses. ofCash ~~these sites~~used in financing activities for ~~potentially~~fiscal ~~significant~~2003 ~~remediation~~was ~~costs~~$17. ~~Moreover~~4 million, which was primarily used ~~there~~to ~~can~~make bescheduled norepayments ~~assurance~~of ~~that~~long-term ~~future~~debt ~~changes~~and inpayment ~~environmental~~of ~~laws~~financing orrelated ~~the~~fees ~~nature~~associated ofwith amending our ~~operations~~credit agreement. ~~will~~Cash ~~not~~used ~~require~~in usfinancing activities for fiscal 2002 was $19.2 million, which was primarily used to make scheduled ~~significant~~repayments ~~additional~~of ~~expenditures~~long-term todebt ~~ensure~~and ~~future~~for AT Holdings’ ~~environmental~~repurchase ~~compliance~~of common stock from various former employees.

• Capital Expenditures. WeOur ~~have~~capital aexpenditures for ~~potential~~fiscal ~~risk~~years 2004, 2003 and 2002 totaled $3.1 million, $1.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively, which were related in each year to maintaining existing facilities and equipment and systems to support current operating activities. For fiscal 2005, we estimate that capital expenditures will total $4.2 million. The majority of ~~product~~these ~~liability~~projects ~~claims~~will be for continued maintenance of facilities and equipment in support of our current operating activities. Capital expenditures are financed with cash generated from operations. We currently have no material commitments for capital expenditures.

Our operations expose us to potential liabilities for personal injury or death as a result of the failure of an aircraft component that has been designed, manufactured or serviced by us, or the irregularity of metal products we have processed or distributed. We believe that our liability insurance is adequate to protect us from future product liability claims. However, there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage will be adequate if claims were to arise.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

In the ordinary course of operations, Argo-Tech’s major market risk exposure is to changing interest rates. Argo-Tech’s exposure to changes in interest rates relates primarily to its long term debt obligations. At October 25, 2003, Argo-Tech had fixed rate debt totaling $195 million, including $2.9 million of accretion, at 8.625% and variable rate debt under its existing credit facility of $25.8 million calculated at Argo-Tech’s choice using an alternate base rate (ABR) or LIBOR, plus a supplemental percentage determined by the ratio of debt to EBITDA. The variable rate is not to exceed ABR plus 2.50% or LIBOR plus 3.50%. Argo-Tech does not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. A 10% fluctuation in interest rates would not materially affect Argo-Tech’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our expected future contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments for the next several fiscal years, as of October 30, 2004, are as follows (in millions):


											2010 and
	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		Thereafter		Total

Term loan facility	$	0.7	$	0.7	$	0.7	$	6.7	$	6.0	$	—	$	14.8
9 1/4% senior notes		—		—		—		—		—		250.0		250.0
Operating leases		0.6		0.3		0.2		0.1		—		—		1.2
Other long-term obligations(1)		22.0		23.7		24.4		23.5		23.2		46.2		163.0

Total contractual cash obligations	$	23.3	$	24.7	$	25.3	$	30.3	$	29.2	$	296.2	$	429.0


(1)	Represents interest payments on the senior notes and estimated funding for retirement and other post-employment benefits. Interest on the term loan facility is excluded as it is not fixed and determinable.

We believe that cash flows from operations will provide adequate funds for our working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, ESOP repurchase obligations and near term debt service requirements. Our ability to fund our operations, make planned capital expenditures, repurchase ESOP shares and make scheduled payments on our indebtedness depends on our future operating performance and cash flows. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all. These items are subject to prevailing conditions and to financial, business, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.

New accounting standards

In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a revised FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 requires existing, unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risks among the parties involved. Argo-Tech is not associated with variable interest entities; therefore, the adoption of this statement did not have any effect on Argo-Tech’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act was enacted, which introduced a Medicare prescription drug benefit and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health-care plans that provide a benefit at least actuarially equivalent to the Medicare benefit. In accordance with FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 106-2, Argo-Tech adopted the provisions of this statement effective with the period beginning August 1, 2004. The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic postretirement benefit cost reflect the provisions of the Act. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on Argo-Tech’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to SFAS No. 132, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,” which expands the disclosure requirements regarding plan assets and benefit obligations for Argo-Tech’s two noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and its postretirement benefit plan. Argo-Tech adopted the provisions of this statement effective with the period beginning February 1, 2004 (see Note 10 in the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report).

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs,” which is an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing.” This statement clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges. The provisions of this statement become effective for Argo-Tech’s fiscal year beginning October 30, 2005. Management has not determined the impact, if any, that this statement will have on Argo-Tech’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment,” which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial

statements based on their fair values. The provisions of this statement become effective for Argo-Tech’s fiscal quarter beginning July 31, 2005. Management has not determined the impact, if any, that this statement will have on Argo-Tech’s consolidated financial statements.

Risk Factors

From time to time, information we provide, statements by our employees or information included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including those portions of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis that refer to the future) may contain forward-looking statements that are not historical facts. Those statements are “forward-looking” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements, and our future performance, operating results, financial position and liquidity, are subject to a variety of factors that could materially affect results, including those described below. Any forward-looking statements made in this report or otherwise, speak only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no obligation to update such statements. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

You should carefully consider each of the risks and uncertainties we describe below and all of the other information in this report. The risks and uncertainties we describe below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are currently unaware or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business.

Risks associated with our business and operations


	Our sales and earnings are dependent on conditions in the airline industry, and a significant or prolonged downturn in the airline industry or a future terrorist attack could decrease the airline industry’s demand for our products and reduce our sales.

The majority of our fiscal 2004 gross profit and operating income was derived from sales of products to engine and aircraft manufacturers, airlines and other customers in the aerospace industry. Any downturn in the airline industry could decrease demand for our products and negatively impact our financial condition. The commercial aerospace industry is cyclical and has historically been subject to fluctuations due to general economic conditions. On September 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the United States with four hijacked U.S. commercial aircraft. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks, passenger traffic on commercial flights was significantly lower than prior to the attacks. Most commercial airlines reduced their operating schedules, lowered fares and implemented cost reduction initiatives. These factors, combined with the impact of the war in Iraq, the outbreak of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus in 2003, as well as increases in fuel costs and a weak U.S. economy, have resulted in large and continuing financial losses in the airline industry. Major carriers around the world have filed for bankruptcy and others are considering bankruptcy protection. Financial losses and reduced schedules in the airline industry have resulted, and will continue to result, in reduced orders and delivery delays of new commercial aircraft, parking and retirement of older aircraft (eliminating those aircraft from maintenance needs and making spare parts from those aircraft available) and delays in airlines’ purchases of aftermarket parts and service as maintenance is deferred. Any recovery in the aerospace industry will be dependent on continuing improvement in the U.S. economy and the occurrence of any event similar to those described above could delay these recoveries. We refer you to our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a discussion of the impact that these factors have had on our results of operations.


	*The aerospace industry is subject to significant government regulation and oversight and failure to comply with these regulations could increase the cost of operating our business.*

The aerospace industry is highly regulated in the United States and in other countries. We must be certified or accepted by the Federal Aviation Administration, the United States Department of Defense and similar agencies in foreign countries and by individual OEMs in order to sell and service parts and components used in specific aircraft models. If material certifications, authorizations or approvals are revoked or suspended, our

operations will be curtailed. In the future, new and more demanding government regulations may be adopted or industry oversight may be increased. We may have to incur significant additional costs to achieve compliance with new regulations or to reacquire a revoked or suspended approval, which could reduce our profitability.


	We compete with a number of established companies, virtually all of which have significantly greater financial, technological and marketing resources than we do. We may not be able to compete effectively with these companies, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The aerospace industry is a highly competitive global industry which has experienced significant consolidation in recent years. This consolidation has caused, and its continuation will amplify, the pricing pressures discussed in the risk factor below regarding the concentration of customers for our products. We may not achieve the cost savings and operational improvements expected from our business strategy or if those savings and improvements are not sufficient to allow us to compete favorably in the future with other larger, consolidated competitors. Competition among aerospace component manufacturers is based on engineered solutions, product quality, customer support, pricing and on-time delivery. In the industrial segment, competition varies by product, but is typically based on engineered solutions, price, product quality and on-time delivery. We may not be able to compete with our competitors, which are typically divisions of large corporations that have significantly greater financial resources than we do. In addition, some suppliers have obtained, and continue to obtain, Parts Manufacturing Authority or “PMA,” from the Federal Aviation Administration to manufacture and sell various Argo-Tech components in the aerospace aftermarket, which has increased the level of competition in this significant portion of our business. While we have attempted to respond to this competition, a significant increase in PMA certifications for our products would further increase this competitive effect.


	If we are unable to meet future capital requirements or to continue our research and development activities, or recoup some of our capital and research and development expenditures, our competitive position may suffer.

In securing new business, we are typically required to expend significant amounts of capital for engineering, research and development, tooling and other costs. Generally, we seek to recoup these costs through pricing and aftermarket revenues over time, but we may be unsuccessful due to competitive pressures and other market constraints, or due to the terms of our contracts. Although we believe that we will be able to fund these expenditures through cash flow from operations and borrowings under our amended senior credit facility, we cannot assure you that we will have adequate funds to make all the necessary capital and research and development expenditures or that the amount of future expenditures will not be materially in excess of our anticipated expenditures. If we are unable to make necessary capital and research and development expenditures or to continue our research and development activities, our business and our competitive position will suffer.

In addition, there are a limited number of commercial main engine fuel pump platforms launched each year. Because these programs result in long-term supply contracts and generate significant aftermarket revenues during the long lifetime of the program, it is very important to our business and future profitability that we are named the main engine fuel pump supplier on some of these programs. If the programs we are selected on are not successful, or if actual orders are less than our estimates, our business and competitive position could suffer.


	*There are a limited number of customers for certain products and the loss of a significant customer would reduce demand for our products and reduce our sales.*

Because of the importance of a few large customers and the high degree of concentration of OEMs in the aerospace industry, our business is exposed to a high degree of risk related to customer concentration. In fiscal 2004, our ten largest customers accounted for approximately 51.2% of our net revenues. A loss of significant business from any of these customers would be harmful to our cash flows, thereby making it more difficult for us to make payments on the notes.

Due to the relatively small number of customers in the aerospace industry, customers, particularly OEM customers, are often able to influence prices and other terms of sale for certain of our products. There is substantial and continuing pressure from OEMs in the aerospace industry to reduce costs, including costs

associated with outside suppliers like us. We attempt to resist downward pricing pressure, while trying to preserve our business relationships with these customers, but we are not always successful. At the same time, it is difficult for us to offset these downward pricing pressures through alternative, less costly sources of raw materials.


	*We have fixed-price contracts with some of our customers and we bear the risk of costs in excess of our estimates.*

We have entered into multi-year, fixed-price contracts with some of our OEM customers, where we have agreed to supply our products for a fixed price and, accordingly, realize all the benefit or detriment resulting from any decreases or increases in the costs of making these products. Sometimes we accept a fixed-price contract for a product that we have not yet produced, which increases the risks of delays or costs in excess of our estimates. The costs that we incur in fulfilling these contracts may vary substantially from our original estimates.

Most of our contracts do not permit us to recover for increases in input prices, taxes or labor costs, although some contracts provide for renegotiation to address certain material adverse changes. Any increase in those costs could increase the cost of operating our business.


	A significant portion of our sales is, and is expected to continue to be, from government contracts that are subject to reductions in defense spending, government regulation and risks particular to government contracts. The termination of any of our government contracts would reduce demand for our products and reduce our sales.

Approximately 38% of our sales in fiscal 2004 were related to U.S. designed military products. In addition, foreign military sales are affected by U.S. government regulations, regulations by the purchasing foreign government and political uncertainties in the U.S. and abroad. The U.S. defense budget has fluctuated in recent years. Although we have experienced increased military sales as a result of military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq, there can be no assurance that the U.S. defense budget will not decline or that sales of defense-related items to foreign governments will continue at present levels. A significant disruption or decline in U.S. military expenditures in the future would materially decrease our military sales. In addition, we are subject to risks particular to contracts with the U.S. government. These risks include the ability of the U.S. government to unilaterally:


	•	suspend us from receiving new contracts pending resolution of alleged violations of procurement laws or regulations;

	•	terminate existing contracts, with or without cause, at any time;

	•	reduce the value of existing contracts;

	•	audit our contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs; and

	•	control or potentially prohibit the export of our products, technology or other data.

Any unexpected termination of a significant government contract would reduce our sales and profitability.


	*A portion of our revenue is derived from international sources, which exposes us to additional uncertainty.*

Approximately 42.8% of our fiscal 2004 net revenue was derived from shipments to destinations outside of the United States and Canada. Sales outside of the United States and Canada are subject to other various risks, including:


	•	governmental embargoes or foreign trade restrictions on antidumping duties;

	•	changes in U.S. and foreign governmental regulations;

	•	tariffs;

	•	other trade barriers;


	•	the potential for nationalization of enterprises;

	•	economic downturns;

	•	inflation;

	•	environmental laws and regulations;

	•	political, economic and social instability; and

	•	difficulties in receivable collections and dependence on foreign personnel and foreign unions.


	Our level of indebtedness could impede our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and prevent us from meeting our obligations under the notes.

We are significantly leveraged. As of October 30, 2004, our total indebtedness was $264.8 million. Our substantial degree of leverage could have important consequences for you, including the following:


	•	it may limit our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes;

	•	a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to payments on our indebtedness and will not be available for other purposes, including our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;

	•	the debt service requirements of our other indebtedness could make it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations, including those related to the notes;

	•	certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under our credit facility, are, and are expected to continue to be, at variable rates of interest, exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates;

	•	it may limit our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and

	•	it may increase our vulnerability to a downturn in general economic conditions or in our business, and may make us unable to carry out capital spending and research and development activities that are important to our growth.


	*We depend on the skill and experience of our senior executives.*

Our success depends upon the efforts, abilities, experience and expertise of the executive officers of our senior management team. Our senior executives have extensive experience in our industry and with our business products and customers. There is competition for these kinds of personnel in the aerospace industry. The failure to retain and/or recruit additional or substitute senior executives and/or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on us.


	*Our operations depend on maintaining a skilled workforce and any interruption in the work force at our facilities or those of OEMs and their suppliers could curtail our operations.*

Because we maintain a relatively small inventory of finished goods, and because the aerospace industry operates on relatively long production lead times, an interruption of our work force due to strikes, work stoppages, shortages of appropriately skilled production and professional workers or other interruption materially could impact our operations.

Our operations are highly dependent on an educated and trained workforce. All of our hourly employees at our Cleveland facility are represented by the United Auto Workers, or UAW, union under a collective bargaining agreement that will expire on March 31, 2008.

Many OEMs and their suppliers also have unionized work forces. Work stoppages or slowdowns experienced by OEMs or their suppliers could result in slowdowns or closures of assembly plants where our products are included in assembled aircraft. Any interruption experienced by OEMs or their suppliers could result in cancellations, reductions or delays in orders by our customers, which could reduce demand for our products and reduce our sales.


	*Our business and profitability is affected by the price and continuity of supply of certain necessary raw materials and component parts.*

We rely on one supplier for CPM-10V, a powdered metal used in the manufacture of certain pump components. If we were unable to obtain adequate supplies of CPM-10V at commercially reasonable prices, our operations could be interrupted. Increased costs associated with supplied materials or components could increase our costs of production and could reduce our profitability if we are unable to make corresponding increases in the prices of our products. We maintain a relatively small inventory of raw materials and component parts, and our business would suffer if supply is reduced or terminated by our suppliers. Although we believe that alternative suppliers, or alternate materials or components, could be identified, the lengthy and expensive Federal Aviation Administration and OEM certification process associated with aerospace products could prevent efficient replacement of a material or supplier.


	*We depend on our Cleveland, Ohio and Costa Mesa, California facilities.*

We believe that our success to date has been, and future results of operations will be, dependent in large part upon our ability to manufacture and deliver products promptly upon receipt of orders and to provide prompt and efficient service to our customers. As a result, any disruption of our day-to-day operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, customer relations and profitability. Our Cleveland, Ohio and Costa Mesa, California facilities are the primary production, research and marketing facilities for our products, and the Cleveland facility also serves as our corporate headquarters. A fire, flood, earthquake or other disaster or condition that damaged or destroyed either of those facilities could disable these functions which are critical to our business.


	*We have potential exposure resulting from environmental matters.*

Our business operations and facilities are subject to a number of federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants and hazardous substances into the air and water as well as the handling, storage and disposal of such materials and other environmental matters. Compliance with such laws is a significant obligation for us at each of our facilities. We would be subject to serious consequences, including fines and other sanctions, and limitations on our operations due to changes to, or revocations of, the environmental permits applicable to our facilities if we fail to comply. Environmental laws and regulations where we operate have become increasingly strict, and may become more strict in the future. This could result in increased compliance costs and increased risk of fines and sanctions for violations.

Under certain environmental laws, liability associated with investigation or remediation of hazardous substances can arise at a broad range of properties, including properties currently or formerly operated by an entity, as well as properties to which an entity sent hazardous substances or wastes for treatment, storage, or disposal. Costs and other obligations can arise from claims for toxic torts, natural resource and other damages, as well as the investigation and clean up of contamination at such properties. Under certain environmental laws, such liability may be imposed jointly and severally, so a party may be responsible for more than its proportionate share and may even be responsible for the entire liability at issue. The extent of any such liability can be difficult to predict.

Our operations at some of our properties involve hazardous materials. Our Cleveland and Costa Mesa facilities are currently the subject of environmental remediation regarding contamination resulting from the operations of our predecessors. Those predecessors have indemnified us for substantially all remediation costs at each site. We cannot assure you, however, that those parties will continue to satisfy their indemnification obligations or that we would not be ultimately responsible at either or both of these sites for potentially

significant environmental liabilities. In addition, we cannot assure you that additional contamination, either at one or both of these sites or at other locations, will not be identified in the future that could result in significant liabilities and obligations to us.


	*We have a potential risk of product liability and warranty claims.*

Our operations expose us to potential liabilities for personal injury or death as a result of the failure of an aircraft component that has been designed, manufactured or serviced by us, or the irregularity or failure of metal products we have processed or distributed. In an effort to improve operating margins, some customers have delayed the replacement of parts beyond our recommended lifetime, which may undermine aircraft safety and increase our risk of liability.

We believe that our liability insurance is adequate to protect us from future product liability claims. However, we cannot assure you that we will not experience any material product liability losses in the future, that we will not incur significant costs to defend such claims, that our insurance coverage will be adequate if claims were to arise or that we would be able to maintain insurance coverage in the future at an acceptable cost. A successful claim brought against us in excess of our available insurance coverage may have a material adverse effect on our business.

In the ordinary course of our business, contractual disputes over warranties can arise. In most cases, financial responsibility for warranty costs is contractually retained by our customer so long as the customers’ specifications are met, but we may nonetheless be subjected to requests for cost sharing or pricing adjustments as a part of our commercial relationship with the customer.


	*Our cash flows and capital resources may be adversely affected by exercises of rights to require us to repurchase or redeem securities of AT Holdings.*

Certain holders of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock of AT Holdings have “put” rights, or rights to require us or AT Holdings to repurchase their securities. Depending on the number of puts and the determined value of AT Holdings common stock at the time of the put, such obligations could from time to time have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and capital resources. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient cash in the future to meet these obligations.

Under the terms governing our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”), participants in the ESOP may put to us, subject to certain restrictions, shares of AT Holdings common stock received from the ESOP at their current value, as determined annually by an independent financial consulting firm (the “ESOP valuation”). Participants may put shares to us after their termination of employment and in specified instances after attaining age 55 with 10 or more years of participation in the ESOP (the “diversification option”). If we do not satisfy the repurchase obligation in cash, we are required to pay the balance of the repurchase price in the form of a promissory note that would be repayable in equal installments over 5 years. In fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, we were required to repurchase an aggregate of approximately $0.5 million, $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of redeemable ESOP stock, which we purchased using available cash. Beginning in 2004, the diversification option became available to eligible ESOP participants, and as a result, our repurchase obligations may increase. In addition, the valuation of AT Holdings common stock by the independent financial consulting firm generally corresponds to our financial performance. If our performance continues to improve and the value of AT Holdings common stock increases, the cost of our repurchase obligations will also increase. In fiscal 2005, we estimate our repurchase obligations could be between $3.5 million and $4.5 million. See “Item 11. Executive Compensation — Compensation pursuant to employee benefit plans — Employee Stock Ownership Plan.”

Certain management and director stockholders of AT Holdings, including the executives named in the executive compensation table included elsewhere in this report and other AT Holdings stockholders, are party to the AT Holdings Stockholders’ Agreement dated December 17, 1998. Pursuant to the stockholders’ agreement and subject to certain limitations, such management and director stockholders have the right, upon termination of their employment or directorship, as the case may be, to put to AT Holdings all but not part of their shares of AT Holdings common stock for a purchase price equal to the greater of (i) the most recent ESOP valuation (as determined by an independent financial consulting firm) or (ii) the sale price of AT Holdings common stock in

any transaction within the last year in which 10% or more of AT Holdings common stock was sold. If AT Holdings cannot satisfy its repurchase obligations in cash (which would be provided by a dividend from Argo-Tech), or is prevented from doing so by the terms of the agreements governing the indebtedness of AT Holdings or its affiliates, including the notes, AT Holdings is required to pay the balance of the repurchase price in the form of a subordinated promissory note. These management and director stockholders currently own approximately 136,230 shares and options to purchase shares, or 20.9%, of AT Holdings common stock.

J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC holds immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 46,025 shares, or 7.0% of AT Holdings common stock. At any time on or after December 31, 2005, J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC can require AT Holdings to redeem any or all of the warrants, in which case AT Holdings must make a cash payment for the value of each warrant redeemed. At October 30, 2004, the value of these warrants was approximately $5.3 million based on the most recent ESOP valuation of AT Holdings common stock by the independent financial consulting firm. The purchase price of the warrants could be higher, as J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC is not required to accept the price determined in connection with the ESOP valuation by the independent financial consulting firm.


	*We may be unable to identify attractive acquisition candidates, successfully integrate our acquired operations or realize the intended benefits of our acquisitions.*

One of our business strategies is to pursue targeted complementary product line or business acquisition opportunities. We intend to evaluate potential acquisitions and engage in discussions with acquisition candidates. We cannot assure you that suitable acquisition candidates will be identified and acquired in the future or that we will be able to accomplish our strategic objectives as a result of any acquisition. Our ability to finance acquisitions may be constrained by our high degree of leverage. Our amended credit facility and the terms of our senior notes issued in June 2004 may significantly limit our ability to make acquisitions and incur indebtedness in connection with the acquisitions. We cannot assure you that our acquisition strategies will be successfully received by customers or achieve their intended benefits. We will encounter various risks in acquiring other product lines or businesses, including the possible inability to integrate an acquired product line or business into our operations, diversion of management’s attention and unanticipated problems or liabilities, some or all of which could adversely affect us.


	*We have only a limited ability to protect our intellectual property rights, which are important to our success.*

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology and other intellectual property. We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, confidentiality policies, nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements and patent, copyright and trademark laws to protect our intellectual property rights. The steps we take in this regard may not be adequate to prevent or deter reverse engineering or infringement or other violation of our intellectual property, and we may not be able to detect unauthorized use or take appropriate and timely steps to enforce our intellectual property rights. In addition, the laws of some countries may not protect and enforce our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.


Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

In the ordinary course of operations, Argo-Tech’s major market risk exposure is to changing interest rates. Argo-Tech’s exposure to changes in interest rates relates primarily to its long term debt obligations. At October 30, 2004, Argo-Tech had fixed rate debt of $250.0 million at 9.25% and variable rate debt under our credit facility of $14.8 million, calculated at Argo-Tech’s choice using an alternate base rate (ABR) or LIBOR, plus a supplemental percentage determined by the ratio of debt to adjusted EBITDA. The variable rate is not to exceed ABR plus 2.50% or LIBOR plus 3.50%. Argo-Tech does not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. A 10% fluctuation in interest rates would not materially affect Argo-Tech’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The response to this item is submitted in a separate section of this report following the signature page.


Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

There were no changes in, or disagreements with, accountants on accounting and financial disclosure.

Item 9a9A. ~~Disclosure~~ Controls and Procedures.

(a)		Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods. Argo-Tech’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of Argo-Tech’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days before the filing of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”), and have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, such controls and procedures were effective at ensuring that required information will be disclosed in Argo-Tech’s reports filed under the Exchange Act.
(b)		Changes in internal controls. There were no significant changes in Argo-Tech’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date.

(a) Disclosure controls and procedures.

20 The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods. Argo-Tech’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of Argo-Tech’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days before the filing of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”), and have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, such controls and procedures were effective at ensuring that required information will be disclosed in Argo-Tech’s reports filed under the Exchange Act.

(b) Changes in internal controls.

There were no significant changes in Argo-Tech’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires management to report on, and its independent auditors to attest to, Argo-Tech’s internal control over financial reporting beginning with the fiscal year ending October 29, 2005. Argo-Tech is actively continuing its ongoing internal process of documenting, testing and evaluating the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting utilizing outside assistance.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of ~~Argo-Tech~~the Registrant.

~~Directors and Executive Officers.~~ The following table sets forth certain information concerning our directors and executive officers. Directors serve until their successors are elected at ~~each~~ each annual meeting. Officers hold office until their successors ~~are~~ are elected and qualified.

Name	Age		Position
Michael S. Lipscomb		5758	Chairman, President &and ~~CEO~~Chief Executive Officer, Director
Paul R. Keen		5455	Executive Vice President, General Counsel &and Secretary, Director
Frances S. St. Clair		4849	Executive Vice President and ~~CFO~~Chief Financial Officer, Director

Michael S. Lipscomb has been Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer since 1994. Mr. Lipscomb joined TRW’s corporate staff in February 1981 and was made Director of Operations for the Power Accessories Division in 1985. Mr. Lipscomb was named Vice President of Operations when Argo-Tech was formed in 1986, becoming President in 1990 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 1994. Mr. Lipscomb has also served as a ~~director~~ director of Argo-Tech and AT Holdings ~~Corporation~~ since 1990.

Paul R. Keen is Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Keen was named Vice President and General Counsel in 1987, became Secretary in December 1990 and was promoted to Executive Vice President in December 2003. Prior to 1987, he he spent the majority of his career with TRW as Senior Counsel, Securities and Finance and as primary legal counsel to two operating groups. Mr. Keen joined the Board of Directors of Argo-Tech in April 1999. ~~and~~Mr. Keen ~~the~~served as a member of the Board of Directors of AT Holdings infrom September 2003 to September 2004.

Frances S. St. Clair is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Ms. St. Clair joined ~~the~~Argo-Tech ~~Company~~ in 1991 as Controller and was promoted to Vice President and Controller in November 1991. Ms. St. Clair was promoted to ~~Chief~~ Chief Financial Officer in November 1992 and to Executive ~~Vice~~ Vice President in December 2003. Ms. St. Clair received her C.P.A. certification in 1984. Ms. St. Clair joined the Board of Directors of Argo-Tech in April 1999. Ms. St. ~~and~~Clair served as a director of AT Holdings from September 2001 to to September 2003 and rejoined in the Board in September 2004.


	*Director compensation*

Since 1999, Argo-Tech has not compensated its directors. AT Holdings pays its directors a quarterly fee of $3,000 plus $4,000 and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for each board meeting attended. Fees paid to Mr. Lipscomb, Mr. Keen and Ms. St. Clair for service on the board of AT Holdings are included in the “Annual compensation” table below.


	*Board Committees*

Argo-Tech does not maintain committees of its board of directors. The board of directors of AT Holdings maintains an audit committee and a compensation committee.


	*Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Financial Officers*

We have adopted a code of ethics for our senior financial officers that include the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and other members of Argo-Tech’s financial leadership team. A copy of the code of ethics is available without charge, by request to: General Counsel, Argo-Tech Corporation, 23555 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland OH 44117. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of our code of ethics through filing a current report on Form 8-K for such events.


Item 11.	Executive Compensation.

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal years ~~2003~~2004, ~~2002~~2003 and ~~2001~~2002, certain information about the compensation paid to or accrued by us for the Chief Executive Officer and each of our other executive officers (the “Named Executives”).

				Annual Compensation
			Annual compensation
													All Other
												All other
Name and Principal Position				Fiscal Year			Salary			Bonus			Compensation(1)(2)
Name and principal position			Fiscal Year			Salary			Bonus			compensation(1)(2)
Michael S. Lipscomb				2004	~~2003~~	$	$484,170	~~461,112~~	$	$346,181	~~225,023~~	$	$38,426	~~50,475~~
	Chairman, President and CEO				2002		$	419,193		$	222,172		$	46,458
	Chairman, President and			2003		$	461,112		$	225,023		$	50,475
					2001		$	419,193		$	272,475		$	46,414
	Chief Executive Officer			2002		$	419,193		$	222,172		$	46,458
Paul R. Keen				2004	~~2003~~	$	$258,804	~~246,480~~	$	$142,342	~~83,310~~	$	$29,074	~~12,806~~
	Executive Vice President, General				2002		$	232,530		$	85,339		$	5,759
	Executive Vice President,			2003		$	246,480		$	83,310		$	12,806
		Counsel and Secretary			2001		$	232,530		$	104,639		$	6,013
	General Counsel and Secretary			2002		$	232,530		$	85,339		$	5,759
Frances S. St. Clair				2004	~~2003~~	$	$236,250	~~225,000~~	$	$129,938	~~76,050~~	$	$10,503	~~23,582~~
	Executive Vice President and CFO				2002		$	200,016		$	73,504		$	25,630
	Executive Vice President and			2003		$	225,000		$	76,050		$	23,582
					2001		$	200,016		$	90,007		$	9,277
	Chief Financial Officer			2002		$	200,016		$	73,504		$	25,630

(1)

Other annual compensation did not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of salary plus bonus of any of the Named Executives in ~~2001~~2002, ~~2002~~2003 or ~~2003~~2004.

(2)

The amounts listed consist of the value of life insurance provided by us for the benefit of the Named Executives in excess of the value of life insurance provided by us for the benefit of all other salaried employees. For Mr. Lipscomb, the amounts listed also include $32,000 for fiscal year 2004, $27,000 for fiscal year 2003 and $22,000 for ~~each~~fiscal ofyear 2002, paid as AT Holdings directors’ fees. For Mr. Keen, the amounts listed also include $25,000 for fiscal ~~years~~year ~~2002~~2004 and ~~2001~~$7,000 ~~respectively,~~for fiscal year 2003 paid as AT Holdings ~~Corporation~~ directors’ fees. For MrMs. ~~Keen~~St. Clair, the amounts listed also include $7,000, $20,000 and $22,000 for fiscal ~~year~~years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, paid as AT Holdings ~~Corporation~~directors’ fees.

21 Management retention agreements

Stay pay and severance agreements. We have entered into a stay pay and severance agreement with each of the Named Executives. Our Board of Directors believes that these agreements benefit us by securing the continued services of key management personnel and by enabling management to perform their duties and responsibilities without the distracting uncertainty generally associated with a change in control.

The agreements provide that, if a change in control (as defined in the agreements) occurs and the executive remains employed by us on a full-time basis through the effective date of the change in control, the executive will receive a single lump sum “stay payment” equal to 25% of the sum of the highest annual base salary and the highest bonus amount received by the executive in the preceding five years.

The agreements also provide that if an executive’s full-time employment is terminated without cause (as defined in the agreements), either before or after a change in control has occurred, or upon a voluntary termination of employment by an executive upon the reduction of his or her base salary by 5% or more, if the reduction is not a result of a company policy to reduce the salaries of a substantial number of officers or employees, or if the executive ceases to be employed in a position involving substantially the same level of responsibility or duties as performed by the executive on the date the agreement was executed (a “Qualifying Voluntary Termination”), the executive will receive a basic severance payment. The payment will consist of a single lump sum equal to the sum of the highest annual base salary and the highest bonus amount received by the executive in the preceding five years.

Additional payments will be made to the executive in the event that a change in control has occurred and the executive’s employment is terminated without cause within the six-month period following the effective date of such change in control, or upon a Qualifying Voluntary Termination within that period. The executive will receive additional severance payments equal to the amount he or she would have received had employment continued, at the same intervals and at the same rate of base salary the executive was receiving during the month preceding termination, until the six-month anniversary of the effective date of the change in control. These additional

~~directors’~~ severance ~~fees. For Ms. St. Clair~~payments, ~~the~~if ~~amounts listed also include $20~~paid,~~000,~~ ~~$22,000~~would ~~and~~be ~~$5,500~~in ~~for~~addition to ~~fiscal~~the ~~years~~basic ~~2003,~~severance ~~2002~~payment and ~~2001,~~the ~~respectively,~~stay ~~paid~~payment ~~as AT Holdings Corporation directors’ fees~~described above.

~~Management~~Each ~~Retention~~executive ~~Agreements~~is entitled to several other benefits contained in the agreements, including:

Stay Pay and Severance Agreements. We have entered into Stay Pay and Severance Agreements with each of the Named Executives. Our Board of Directors believes that these severance agreements benefit us by securing the continued services of key management personnel and by enabling management to perform their duties and responsibilities without the distracting uncertainty generally associated with a change in control.


	•	life, health, medical/hospital, dental, and vision insurance benefits for a period of 12 months in the event that an executive’s full-time employment is terminated without cause or upon a Qualifying Voluntary Termination, either before or after a change in control has occurred; and

	•	gross-up payments to cover any excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) upon any payment made to the executive under the agreements, subject to certain limitations.

~~The~~We ~~severance~~have ~~agreements~~agreed ~~provide~~to ~~that,~~be ifsolely ~~a change~~responsible infor ~~control~~any and ~~(as~~all ~~defined~~attorneys’ infees ~~the agreements) occurs~~ and ~~the executive~~related ~~remains~~expenses ~~employed~~incurred by ~~us on a full-time basis through~~ the ~~effective~~executive ~~date of the change~~ in ~~control,~~ the ~~executive~~event ~~will receive~~that awe ~~single~~fail ~~lump sum “stay payment” equal~~ to ~~25% of~~comply ~~the~~with ~~sum of the highest annual base salary and the highest~~our ~~bonus~~obligations ~~amount~~under ~~received by~~ the ~~executive in the preceding five years~~agreements.

~~The~~Trust ~~severance~~agreement. ~~agreements~~In connection ~~also~~with ~~provide that if~~ an ~~executive’s~~ ~~full-time~~additional ~~employment~~stay ispay ~~terminated~~agreement ~~without~~with ~~cause (as defined in the agreements)~~Mr. Lipscomb, ~~either~~we ~~before~~entered orinto ~~after~~ a ~~change~~ intrust ~~control has occurred~~agreement, ~~or upon a voluntary termination~~which ofestablished ~~employment~~an byirrevocable angrantor ~~executive~~trust ~~upon~~for the ~~reduction~~benefit of ~~his or her~~ ~~base~~Mr. Lipscomb ~~salary~~as ~~by 5% or more, if~~ the ~~reduction~~beneficiary. isThe ~~not~~stay apay ~~result of a~~agreement ~~company~~provides ~~policy~~for topayment ~~reduce the salaries~~ of a$315,600 ~~substantial~~on ~~number~~January 1, ~~of officers or employees~~2007, or ~~if the executive ceases to be employed~~ in a position involving substantially the same level of responsibility or duties as performed by the executive on the date the severance agreement was executed (a “Qualifying Voluntary Termination”)earlier, ~~the~~upon ~~executive will receive a basic severance payment~~Mr. Lipscomb’s ~~The~~voluntary ~~payment~~or ~~will consist of a single lump sum~~involuntary ~~equal~~termination ~~to the sum~~ of ~~the~~full-time ~~highest~~employment ~~annual~~with ~~base~~us, ~~salary~~with ~~and~~or ~~the~~without ~~highest~~cause ~~bonus~~(as ~~amount~~defined ~~received by the executive~~ in the ~~preceding five~~stay ~~years~~pay agreement).

Each executive is entitled to several other benefits contained in the severance agreements, including

• life, health, medical/hospital, dental, and vision insurance benefits for a period of 12 months in the event that an executive’s full-time employment is terminated without cause or upon a Qualifying Voluntary Termination, either before or after a change in control has occurred and

• gross-up payments to cover any excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code upon any payment made to the executive under the severance agreements, subject to certain limitations.

We have agreed to be solely responsible for any and all attorneys’ fees and related expenses incurred by the executive in the event that we fail to comply with our obligations under the severance agreements.

Trust Agreement. In connection with an additional stay pay agreement with Mr. Lipscomb, we entered into a trust agreement, which established an irrevocable grantor trust for the benefit of Mr. Lipscomb as the beneficiary. This agreement provides for payment of $315,600 on January 1, 2007, or earlier, upon Mr. Lipscomb’s voluntary or involuntary termination of full-time employment with us, with or without cause (as defined in the agreement).

The assets to be held by the trust include the original deposit of principal and any other contributions made by us, at our option. These trust assets are to be disposed of by the trustee when certain conditions in Mr. Lipscomb’s stay pay agreement occur or when the trustee is directed by two officers of Argo-Tech, other than Mr. Lipscomb, to dispose of the assets.

If the amount disbursed by the trustee exceeds the amount to which Mr. Lipscomb or his qualifying successor is entitled under the stay pay agreement, Mr. Lipscomb or his qualifying successor is entitled to retain such excess. The trust assets and any income earned on those assets remain at all times subject to the claims of our general creditors under state and federal law.

~~This~~The stay pay agreement also provides for the payment of attorneys’ ~~expenses~~fees if enforcement of the ~~contract~~stay ~~becomes~~pay agreement becomes necessary, and contains certain restrictions on certain types of competitive activity by Mr. Lipscomb. The benefits provided by the trust and ~~this~~the stay pay agreement and the ~~Trust~~trust ~~Agreement~~ agreement are in addition to the benefits provided under ~~the~~Mr. Lipscomb’s Stay Pay and severance ~~agreements~~ agreement described above and Mr. Lipscomb’s employment agreement ~~contract which is~~ described below.

Employment ~~Agreements~~agreements. We have also entered into employment ~~contracts~~agreements with Mr. Lipscomb and Mr. Keen~~. These~~, ~~contracts~~which also provide for the ~~payment~~payments of severance benefits upon termination of employment without cause (as defined in the ~~contracts~~employment agreements). In the event of such a termination, Mr. Lipscomb will receive all salary and bonuses for a period of twelve months from the date of termination, in an amount equal to all salary and bonuses received during the twelve month period immediately preceding termination. and a continuation of benefits during such period. Mr. Keen will receive, in the event of such a termination, a single lump sum payment equal to 24 twenty-four months of his base salary, in an amount calculated from the base salary in effect for the full month immediately preceding the date of termination. ~~Both~~ Mr. ~~Lipscomb and Mr.~~ Keen will receive life, health, medical/hospital, dental and vision insurance benefits for a period of twelve months following termination. Mr. Keen’s ~~contract~~ agreement also provides for the payment of attorneys’ ~~expenses~~fees if enforcement of the ~~contract~~agreement becomes necessary, and contains restrictions on certain competitive activities by Mr. Keen. ~~The benefits provided by these~~ ~~additional contracts are provided in addition to the benefits~~ ~~provided under the severance agreements, and~~ ~~Mr. Lipscomb’s trust agreement.~~

~~Compensation~~The ~~Committee~~benefits ~~Interlocks~~provided by these additional agreements are provided in addition to the benefits and ~~Insider~~payments ~~Participation~~provided under the severance stay pay and severance agreements and Mr. Lipscomb’s trust agreement.

~~Argo-Tech~~Compensation ~~Corporation~~pursuant ~~does~~to ~~not~~employee ~~have a~~benefit ~~compensation committee or similar board committee. Decisions~~plans ~~regarding executive officer compensation are made by the~~ ~~compensation committee of the Board of Directors of AT Holdings Corporation, the parent company of the registrant. This compensation committee is comprised solely of non-employee directors.~~

~~Compensation~~Salaried ~~Pursuant~~Pension ~~to Employee Benefit Plans of the Company~~ Plan

~~Retirement~~ Our Salaried Pension Plan was established effective November 1, 1986. Prior to July 1, 1994, our regular, permanent salaried employees were eligible to participate in this plan. Participation in the plan was closed to any

31 ~~Salaried Pension~~ ~~Plan. Our Salaried Pension Plan was~~ ~~established effective November 1, 1986. Prior to~~ July 1, 1994, our regular, permanent, salaried employees were eligible to participate in this plan. Participation in the plan was closed to any person who was not a participant on June 30, 1994, and all benefit accruals ceased as of the close of business on June 30, 1994. The benefits of participants in the Salaried Pension Plan who were employees on June 30, 1994 became vested (to the extent otherwise non-vested) as of the close of business on June 30, 1994. Employee contributions were neither required nor permitted.

The monthly normal retirement benefit under the Salaried Pension Plan is 1.25% of a participant’s final average monthly compensation multiplied by the participant’s years of benefit service. Compensation earned after June 30, 1994, and service performed after June 30, 1994, are not taken into account in determining a participant’s benefit under the Salaried Pension Plan. Final average monthly compensation means the average monthly compensation (computed before withholdings, deductions for taxes or other purposes, and salary reduction amounts under the Argo-Tech Employee Savings Plan) paid or payable to the participant for the five calendar years which produce the highest such average, determined as if the participant’s employment terminated on June 30, 1994 (or, if earlier, the date the participant’s employment actually terminated or the participant ceased to be within the class of employees eligible to participate in the Salaried Pension Plan). If a participant ceased to be within the class of employees eligible to participate or a participant’s employment terminated (or is deemed to have terminated) prior to July 1 of a calendar year, that calendar year is not taken into account for purposes of determining final average monthly compensation. A participant’s vested benefit cannot be less than the participant’s vested benefit under the Salaried Pension Plan, if any, as of October 31, 1989.

~~The~~person ~~Internal~~who ~~Revenue~~was ~~Code~~not ofa ~~1986,~~participant ~~limits~~on ~~the~~June 30, ~~maximum~~1994, ~~annual~~and ~~retirement~~all benefit ~~payable~~accruals ~~under~~ceased as of the ~~Salaried~~close of ~~Pension~~business ~~Plan~~on ~~and~~June 30, ~~the~~1994. ~~maximum~~The ~~amount~~benefits of ~~annual~~participants ~~compensation~~in the ~~that~~Salaried Pension Plan who were employees on June 30, ~~can~~1994 bebecame ~~taken~~vested ~~into~~(to ~~account~~the inextent ~~calculating~~otherwise ~~benefits~~non-vested) ~~under~~as of the close of business on June 30, 1994. Employee ~~Salaried~~contributions ~~Pension~~were ~~Plan~~neither required nor permitted.

AtThe normal monthly retirement, ~~based~~benefit onunder ~~benefits~~the Salaried ~~accrued~~Pension asPlan is 1.25% of a participant’s final average monthly compensation multiplied by the participant’s years of benefit service. Compensation earned after June 30, 1994, and service performed after June 30, 1994, are not taken into account in determining a participant’s benefit under the Salaried Pension Plan. Final average monthly ~~retirement~~compensation ~~benefits~~means the average monthly compensation (computed before withholdings, deductions for taxes or other purposes and salary reduction amounts under the Salaried Savings Plan (as defined and discussed below)) paid or payable to the participant for the five calendar years which ~~each~~produce ofthe highest such average, determined as if the participant’s ~~individuals~~employment ~~named~~terminated on June 30, 1994 (or, if earlier, the date the participant’s employment actually terminated or the participant ceased to be within the class of employees eligible to participate in the ~~Summary~~Salaried Pension ~~Compensation~~Plan). ~~Table~~If a participant ceased to be within the class of ~~are:~~employees eligible to participate or a participant’s employment terminated (or is deemed to have terminated) prior to July 1 of a calendar year, that calendar year is not taken into account for purposes of determining final average monthly compensation. A participant’s vested benefit cannot be less than the participant’s vested benefit under the Salaried Pension Plan, if any, as of October 31, 1989.

	Monthly
Name	Benefit
Michael S. Lipscomb	$	1,799.32
Paul R. Keen	$	1,188.83
Frances S. St. Clair	$	411.56

The Code limits the maximum annual retirement benefit payable under the Salaried Pension Plan and the maximum amount of annual compensation that can be taken into account in calculating benefits under the Salaried Pension Plan.

At retirement, based on benefits accrued as of June 30, 1994, the monthly retirement benefits payable to each of the individuals named in the “Annual compensation” table above are:


	Monthly
Name	benefit

Michael S. Lipscomb	$	1,799.32
Paul R. Keen	$	1,188.83
Frances S. St. Clair	$	411.56

The benefits shown above are in the form of a single life annuity commencing as of the first day of the month after the participant attains age 65. Benefits may commence at any time after age 55 if the participant had at least five years of service when the participant’s employment terminated. Actuarial reductions would apply for early commencement and for payment in the form of a joint and survivor annuity.

The normal form of payment under the Salaried Pension Plan is a single life annuity. However, participants may elect payment of retirement benefits under several joint and survivor forms of payment, subject to the requirement that a married participant receive benefits in the form of a joint and survivor annuity with the spouse as contingent annuitant unless the spouse consents to the participant’s election of another form of payment, another contingent annuitant, or both, as applicable.


	*Salaried Savings Plan*

Our Employee Savings Plan for salaried employees (the “Salaried Savings Plan”) has been in place since 1987. Regular, permanent, salaried employees who have completed at least 3 months of service are eligible to participate in the plan. All assets of the plan are held in trust. Participants may elect to have “tax-deferred” (401(k) compensation reduction) contributions made to the plan of up to 40% of their eligible compensation. Participants may also elect to have after-tax contributions made to the Plan of up to 20% of their eligible compensation. In addition, participants over the age of 50 are allowed to make catch-up contributions (up to $2,000 in 2003 and $3,000 in 2004). Employer matching contributions to the plan ceased on July 1, 1994. For periods before July 1, 1994, the Salaried Savings Plan provided for employer matching contributions as follows: Basic matching contributions of 25% of each participant’s tax-deferred contributions not in excess of 3% of compensation and discretionary additional matching contributions of a percentage (within the range of 0% and 125% established for each fiscal year (the “plan year”)) of each participant’s tax-deferred contributions not in

32 ~~Participants may elect to have~~ ~~“tax-deferred” (401(k) compensation reduction)~~ ~~contributions made to the plan of up to 40% of their eligible~~ compensation. Participants may also elect to have after-tax contributions made to the Plan of up to 20% of their eligible compensation. In addition, participants over the age of 50 were allowed to make catch-up contributions of up to $2,000. Employer matching contributions to the plan ceased on July 1, 1994. For periods before July 1, 1994, the Salaried Savings Plan provided for employer matching contributions as follows: Basic matching contributions of 25% of each participant’s tax-deferred contributions not in excess of 3% of compensation and discretionary additional matching contributions of a percentage (within the range of 0% and 125% established for each fiscal year (the “plan year”)) of each participant’s tax-deferred contributions not in excess of 3% of compensation. A participant’s benefit under the plan is the balance of the participant’s accounts attributable to after-tax contributions and the vested balance of the participant’s accounts attributable to employer matching contributions. Tax-deferred contributions and after-tax contributions are always 100% vested. Participants (including former employees) whose accounts attributable to employer matching contributions had not been forfeited prior to November 1, 1994, became, to the extent otherwise non-vested, 100% vested. Benefits are payable in the form of a single lump sum payment.

The Internal Revenue Code limits the maximum annual contributions that can be made to the Salaried Savings Plan and the maximum amount of annual compensation that can be taken into account in calculating contributions to the Salaried Savings Plan. Contributions for a plan year on behalf of certain highly compensated individuals may also be limited to comply with Internal Revenue Code’s nondiscrimination requirements.

Benefits are generally payable after a participant’s employment terminates. A participant who is an employee may, however, apply for an in-service distribution of all or a portion of the participant’s vested account balance after attainment of age 59 1/2 or in the event of a hardship (as defined in the Salaried Savings Plan). A participant may apply for an in-service distribution of after-tax contributions at any age and for any reason. A participant who is a “party in interest” may apply for a loan of up to 50% of the participant’s vested account balance (subject to a $50,000 maximum) under the Salaried Savings Plan.

excess of 3% of compensation. A participant’s benefit under the plan is the balance of the participant’s accounts attributable to tax-deferred contributions, after-tax contributions and the vested balance of the participant’s accounts attributable to employer matching contributions. Tax-deferred contributions and after-tax contributions are always 100% vested. Participants (including former employees) whose accounts attributable to employer matching contributions had not been forfeited prior to November 1, 1994, became, to the extent otherwise nonvested, 100% vested. Benefits are payable in the form of a single lump sum payment.

The Code limits the maximum annual contributions that can be made to the Salaried Savings Plan and the maximum amount of annual compensation that can be taken into account in calculating contributions to the Salaried Savings Plan. Contributions for a plan year on behalf of certain highly compensated individuals may also be limited to comply with the Code’s nondiscrimination requirements.


	*Employee Stock Ownership Plan*

The ~~Employee~~ESOP ~~Stock Ownership Plan~~ was established in 1994 with the participation of Argo-Tech’s salaried employees at its Cleveland facility. GreatBanc Trust Company serves as the plan’s trustee, and holds all of its assets in trust.

On May 17, 1994, the trustee purchased 420,000 shares of common stock of AT Holdings ~~Corporation~~ with ~~the~~ the proceeds of a $16.8 million loan from us to the ~~Employee~~ ~~Stock Ownership Plan~~ESOP. The term of the loan, ~~unless~~ended ~~it is prepaid or accelerated, ends~~ on April 28, 2004 and the loan was repaid in full. The interest rate for the loan iswas fixed for the ten -year term at 7.16% per year. The purchase price for the AT Holdings common stock was $40 per share.

The shares of AT Holdings’ common stock purchased by the ~~Employee~~ESOP ~~Stock Ownership Plan~~ with the proceeds of the loan are held in a suspense account and released to eligible participants on a pro rata basis as loan principal payments are made. Shares released from the plan for each plan year are allocated to each eligible participant’s account based on the ratio of each such participant’s eligible compensation to the total eligible compensation of all eligible participants. Forfeitures of the accounts of non-vested participants are reallocated among eligible participants in the same manner as shares of AT Holdings ~~Holding’s~~ common stock released from the suspense account.

For each of the ~~Plan~~plan ~~Years~~years ended October 31, ~~2001, October 31,~~ 2002 and October 31, 2003, 42,000 shares of AT Holdings’ common stock were released from the ~~suspense~~ suspense account. ~~Based~~In on the plan year ending October 31, 2004, 21,000 shares of AT Holdings common stock were released. The loan ~~payment~~was ~~schedule~~repaid in full in April 2004, ~~the~~and ~~number~~as a ofresult, no shares of AT Holdings’ common stock ~~released~~remain ~~from~~in the suspense account ~~each~~for release in future plan ~~year during the loan period~~years. ~~would be:~~

	Number of
	Shares
Plan Year Ending	Released
October 31, 2004		21,000

We may, for any plan year, make additional discretionary contributions for the benefit of plan participants. These contributions may be made in cash, shares of qualifying employer securities or other property. Whether the ESOP will acquire additional shares of AT Holdings common stock or other qualifying employer securities in the future depends upon future business conditions. Such purchases, if made, would be funded through additional borrowings by the plan or additional contributions from us. The timing, amount and manner of future contributions to the plan will be affected by various factors, including prevailing regulatory policies, the requirements of applicable laws and regulations and market conditions. We contributed 21,000 shares of AT Holdings common stock to the plan in October 2004 and will contribute 42,000 shares in October 2005. All of these 63,000 shares have been repurchased by Argo-Tech from plan participants who exercised their put option rights under the plan. These rights are described below.

IfParticipants wemay ~~make~~elect ~~additional contributions~~ to receive the shares of ~~Employee~~qualifying ~~Stock~~employer ~~Ownership~~securities ~~Plan,~~credited ~~the~~to ~~plan~~their ~~would~~accounts ~~use~~after their ~~the~~termination of employment. After attaining age 55 ~~contribution~~with to10 ~~“prepay”~~or more years of participation in the ~~loan~~ESOP, ~~and~~participants may ~~shares~~also ~~would~~elect ~~be released~~to ~~from~~receive ~~the~~a ~~suspense~~maximum ~~account~~of ~~more~~50% ~~rapidly~~of ~~than~~their ~~shown~~vested ~~above.~~shares ~~If,~~over ~~however,~~a ~~for~~six ~~any~~year ~~reason~~period. weParticipants dovest ~~not~~in ~~make~~their ~~contributions~~plan toaccounts 20% per ~~the~~year ~~plan~~of toservice, ~~pay~~and ~~the~~service ~~principal~~prior on to the ~~loan~~effective asdate ~~described~~of ~~above,~~ the ~~shares~~plan ~~would~~counts ~~not~~for bethis ~~released~~purpose. ~~from~~A participant ~~the~~can ~~suspense~~require ~~account~~us asto purchase qualifying employer ~~rapidly~~securities asreceived ~~shown~~from ~~above.~~the

33 ~~We may, for any plan year, make additional~~ ~~discretionary contributions for the benefit of plan~~ ~~participants. These contributions may be made in cash, shares of~~ ~~qualifying employer securities, or other property.~~

Whether the Employee Stock Ownership Plan will acquire additional shares of AT Holdings’ common stock or other qualifying employer securities in the future depends upon future business conditions. Such purchases, if made, would be funded through additional borrowings by the plan or additional contributions from us. The timing, amount and manner of future contributions to the plan will be affected by various factors, including prevailing regulatory policies, the requirements of applicable laws and regulations, and market conditions.

Participants may elect to receive the shares of qualifying employer securities credited to their accounts after their termination of employment, and in specified instances, after attaining age 55 with 10 or more years of participation in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Participants vest in their plan accounts 20% per year of service, and service prior to the effective date of the plan counts for this purpose. A participant can require us to purchase qualifying employer securities received from the plan at the value the stock then has, as determined for plan purposes (a “put option”). Shares of qualifying employer securities distributed from the plan are subject to a “right of first refusal” in favor of us or the Employee Stock Ownership Plan at the value the stock then has, as determined for purposes of the plan. The put option and right of first refusal will no longer apply if the qualifying employer securities become tradeable on an established securities market.

Voting rights on and decisions whether to tender or exchange shares of qualifying employer securities held in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan are “passed through” to participants. Each participant is entitled to direct the plan’s trustee as to the voting of (1) shares of qualifying employer securities credited to the participant’s account; and (2) a proportionate part of the unallocated shares of qualifying employer securities held in the suspense account and shares of qualifying employer securities allocated to participants’ accounts as to which no direction is received by the plan’s trustee. In the event of a tender or exchange offer for qualifying employer

~~securities~~plan ~~held~~at inthe value the ~~plan~~stock then has, ~~each~~as determined ~~participant~~for isplan purposes (a “put option”). Shares ~~entitled~~of toqualifying ~~direct~~employer securities distributed from the plan’s ~~Trustee~~are subject ~~whether~~ to ~~tender~~a ~~or exchange~~“right ~~shares~~of first refusal” in favor of ~~qualifying~~us or ~~employer~~the ~~securities~~ESOP ~~held~~at inthe value the stock then has, as determined ~~plan~~annually inby aan ~~manner~~independent ~~similar~~financial toconsulting firm based on our performance and financial condition. The put option and right of first refusal will no longer apply if the ~~voting~~qualifying employer ~~directions~~securities ~~described~~become tradable on an established securities ~~above~~market.

~~Because~~Voting rights on and decisions whether to tender or exchange shares of qualifying employer securities held in the ESOP are “passed through” to participants. Each participant is entitled to direct the plan’s trustee as to the voting of (1) shares of qualifying employer securities credited to the participant’s ~~contributions~~account and (2) a proportionate part of the unallocated shares of qualifying employer securities held in the suspense account and shares of qualifying employer securities allocated to participants’ accounts as to which no direction is received by the plan’s ~~Employee~~trustee. ~~Stock~~In ~~Ownership~~the ~~Plan~~event ~~are~~of ~~not~~a ~~fixed~~tender or exchange offer for qualifying employer securities held in the plan, ~~benefits~~each participant ~~payable~~is entitled to direct the plan’s Trustee ~~under~~whether to tender or exchange shares of qualifying employer securities held in the plan ~~cannot~~in bea ~~estimated~~manner similar to the voting directions described above.

~~For~~Because the ~~plan~~employer’s ~~year~~contributions ~~ended~~to ~~October 31, 2003,~~ the ESOP ~~number~~are ofnot ~~shares~~fixed, ofbenefits ATpayable ~~Holdings’ common stock allocated~~ under the ~~Employee~~plan ~~Stock~~cannot ~~Ownership Plan to the accounts of the~~be ~~individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table were:~~estimated.

	Shares Allocated
	Year Ended		Cumulative to
Name	Oct. 31, 2003		Oct. 31, 2003
Michael S. Lipscomb		517.4476		4,041.3309
Paul R. Keen		517.4476		4,041.3309
Frances S. St. Clair		517.4476		3,992.3665

For the plan year ended October 31, 2004, the number of shares of AT Holdings common stock allocated under the ESOP to the accounts of the Named Executives were:

Generally accepted accounting principles require that any third party borrowing by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan be reflected as a liability on our statement of financial condition. Since the plan is borrowing from us, the obligation is not treated as an asset of ours, but will be deducted from shares of stock held by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. If the plan purchases newly issued shares of AT Holdings’ common stock, total stockholders’ equity would neither increase nor decrease.



	Shares allocated

	Year ended		Cumulative to
Name	Oct. 31, 2004		Oct. 31, 2004

Michael S. Lipscomb		514.3801		4,557.3995
Paul R. Keen		514.3801		4,557.3995
Frances S. St. Clair		514.3801		4,508.4351

~~The~~GAAP ~~Internal~~requires ~~Revenue Service has issued a determination letter~~ that ~~the~~any ~~plan~~third isparty ~~qualified~~borrowing ~~under~~by ~~Section 401(a) of~~ the ~~Internal~~ESOP ~~Revenue~~be ~~Code~~reflected ~~and~~as isa ~~an employee~~liability ~~stock~~on ~~ownership~~our ~~plan~~statement ~~under Section 4975(e)(7)~~of ~~thereof~~financial condition. ~~Contributions~~Since to the plan ~~and~~borrowed ~~allocations~~from tous, the ~~accounts~~obligation ofis ~~eligible~~not ~~participants~~treated ~~thereunder~~as ~~are~~an ~~subject~~asset ~~to applicable~~of ~~limitations~~ours, ~~imposed~~but ~~under~~will ~~the~~be deducted ~~Internal~~from ~~Revenue~~shares ~~Code. The~~of ~~plan~~stock isheld ~~subject~~by to the ~~requirements~~ESOP. ofIf the ~~Employee~~plan ~~Retirement~~purchases ~~Income~~newly ~~Security~~issued ~~Act~~shares of ~~1974,~~AT asHoldings ~~amended~~common stock, ~~and the~~total ~~regulations~~stockholders’ ~~thereunder~~equity would neither increase nor decrease.

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a determination letter that the plan is qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code and is an employee stock ownership plan under Section 4975(e)(7) thereof. Contributions to the plan and allocations to the accounts of eligible participants thereunder are subject to applicable limitations imposed under the Code. The plan is subject to the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, known as “ERISA,” and the regulations thereunder.


	*Employee Stock Ownership Plan Excess Benefit Plan*

We maintain the ~~Employee~~ESOP ~~Stock Ownership Plan~~ Excess Benefit Plan, an unfunded plan that at all times will be deemed invested in AT Holdings common stock. This plan is for employees participating in the ~~Employee~~ESOP ~~Stock Ownership Plan~~ in respect of reduction to allocations to their accounts because of limitations under the ~~Internal Revenue~~ Code applicable to tax-qualified plans. Benefits under this plan vest in the same manner as benefits under the ~~Employee~~ESOP ~~Stock Ownership Plan~~ and distributions from the plan will, subject to certain restrictions, be made in whole or fractional shares of AT Holdings common stock at the same time or times as benefits under the ~~Employee~~ESOP ~~Stock Ownership Plan~~ are distributable, or in ~~the~~ the case of benefits with respect to qualifying employer ~~securities~~ securities subject to the put option under the ~~Employee~~ESOP, ~~Stock Ownership Plan~~ at the time the plan participant exercises (or is deemed to have exercised) a hypothetical “put option” under the plan.

34 ~~We maintain a bookkeeping account for amounts~~ ~~credited to the accounts of plan participants. For the plan year~~ ~~ended October 31, 2003, the amounts credited to the~~ ~~accounts of the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table were:~~

	Equivalent Shares Allocated
	Year Ended		Cumulative to
Name	Oct. 31, 2003		Oct. 31, 2003
Michael S. Lipscomb		1,161.0895		8,256.0075
Paul R. Keen		299.7795		2,153.7718
Frances S. St. Clair		217.7290		1,404.0268

Incentive Stock Option Plans

1991 Performance Stock Option Plan. The 1991 Performance Stock Option Plan provides for option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings’ common stock. The exercise price of each option is $10.00 per share. All of the

~~options~~We ~~available~~maintain ~~under~~a ~~this~~bookkeeping ~~plan~~account ~~were~~for ~~granted~~amounts ~~and~~credited ~~have~~to ~~been amended by~~ the ~~Compensation~~accounts ~~Committee~~ of ~~AT Holdings,~~plan ~~upon~~participants. For the ~~recommendation~~plan ofyear ended ~~our~~October 31, ~~compensation committee~~2004, ~~and~~ ~~with~~ the ~~consent~~amounts ofcredited ~~the~~to ~~optionees in June 2001. These~~the ~~options~~accounts ~~expire on November 9, 2011. All~~ of the ~~options under~~Named ~~this~~Executives ~~plan became fully vested in January 1999.~~were:

Aggregate Option/ SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year



	Equivalent shares allocated

	Year ended		Cumulative to
Name	Oct. 31, 2004		Oct. 31, 2004

Michael S. Lipscomb		1,218.2482		9,474.2557
Paul R. Keen		320.4934		2,474.2652
Frances S. St. Clair		247.5342		1,651.5610

~~and~~Incentive ~~Fiscal~~stock ~~Year~~option ~~End Option/ SAR Values~~ plans

							Number of
							Securities		Value of
							Underlying		Unexercised
							Unexercisable		In-the-Money
							Options/SAR’s at		Options at
							FY-End		FY-End($)
			Shares
	Exercise		Acquired on		Value		Exercisable/		Exercisable/
Name	Price($)		Exercise		Realized($)		Unexercisable		Unexercisable
Michael S. Lipscomb	$	10.00		0	$	0		8,670/—	$	300,150/ $—
		40.00		0		0		6,125/—		28,298/ —
		100.00		0		0		4,000/—		—/ —
		49.79		0		0		12,617/6,309		—/ —
Paul R. Keen		10.00		0		0		1,990/—		68,894/ —
		40.00		0		0		2,760/—		12,751/ —
		100.00		0		0		1,400/—		—/ —
		49.79		0		0		4,462/2,231		—/ —
Frances S. St. Clair		10.00		0		0		2,990/—		103,514/ —
		40.00		0		0		2,760/—		12,751/ —
		100.00		0		0		1,400/—		—/ —
		49.79		0		0		4,462/2,231		—/ —

Aggregate Option/SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year

~~1991~~and ~~Management~~Fiscal ~~Incentive~~Year ~~Stock~~End Option ~~Plan.~~/SAR ~~The 1991 Management Incentive Stock~~Values Option Plan provides for option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings’ common stock. The exercise price of each option is $10.00 per share. All of the options available under this plan were granted and have been amended by the Compensation Committee of AT Holdings, upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, and with the consent of the optionees in June 2001. These options expire on November 9, 2011. All of the options under this plan became fully vested in January 1999.

1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan. The 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan (as amended June 12, 2001) was established to provide for option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings’ common stock. The exercise price of each option is $40.00 per share. The options were granted to each person who was a participant in the 1997 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan in exchange for, and in cancellation of, all of the rights of each such participant under the Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (See Benefits Restructuring). These options, which were granted by the Compensation Committee of AT Holdings upon the recommendation of our compensation committee, expire on January 2, 2005. All of the options under this plan were fully vested upon issuance.


							Number of
							Securities			Value of
							Underlying			Unexercised
							Unexercisable			In-The-Money
							Options/SARs at			Options at
							FY-End			FY-End($)
			Shares
	Exercise		Acquired on		Value		Exercisable/			Exercisable/
Name	Price($)		Exercise		Realized($)		Unexercisable			Unexercisable

Michael S. Lipscomb	$	10.00		—	$	—		8,670/	—	$	914,598/ $—
		40.00		—		—		6,125/	—		462,376/ —
		100.11		—		—		4,000/	—		61,520/ —
		49.79		—		—		18,926/	—		1,243,438/ —
Paul R. Keen	$	10.00		—		—		1,990/	—		209,925/ —
		40.00		—		—		2,760/	—		208,352/ —
		100.11		—		—		1,400/	—		21,532/ —
		49.79		—		—		6,693/	—		439,730/ —
Frances S. St. Clair	$	10.00		—		—		2,990/	—		315,415/ —
		40.00		—		—		2,760/	—		208,352/ —
		100.11		—		—		1,400/	—		21,532/ —
		49.79		—		—		6,693/	—		439,730/ —

~~1998~~1991 ~~Incentive~~Performance Stock Option Plan. The ~~1998~~1991 ~~Incentive~~Performance ~~Plan was~~Stock ~~established~~Option toPlan ~~provide~~provides for option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings’ common stock,. atThe ~~prices~~exercise ~~that~~price ~~may~~of beeach ~~more~~option ~~than,~~is ~~less~~$10.00 per ~~than,~~share. orAll ~~equal to the fair market value~~ of the ~~shares,~~options ~~as the~~available ~~Board~~under ~~or Compensation Committee of AT Holdings may determine~~this atplan ~~the~~were ~~time~~granted ofand ~~grant.~~have ~~Options~~been ~~are~~amended ~~granted~~ by the Compensation Committee of AT Holdings, upon the recommendation of our compensation committee~~. There have been three option grants under the 1998 Incentive Plan~~, ~~the~~and ~~first in 1999~~ with ~~an exercise~~the ~~price~~consent of ~~$100.11,~~ the ~~second~~optionees in June 2001, ~~with~~to anextend ~~exercise price of $69.18 and~~ the ~~third~~expiration indate ~~2002~~to ~~with an exercise price of~~November 9, ~~$49~~2011.~~79.~~ ~~The~~All ~~option~~of ~~agreement governing~~ the options granted ~~in 1999~~under ~~provides~~this ~~that~~plan ~~such~~became ~~options vest in 20% increments over five~~fully ~~successive~~vested ~~years. For any year~~ in ~~which~~January ~~the EBITDA of the~~1999. ~~company exceeds 105% of the~~

27 1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan. The 1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan provides for option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings common stock. The exercise price of each option is $10.00 per share. All of the options available under this plan were granted and have been amended by the Compensation Committee of AT Holdings, upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, and with the consent of the optionees in June 2001, to extend the expiration date to November 9, 2011. All of the options granted under this plan became fully vested in January 1999.

1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan. The 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan (as amended June 12, 2001) was established to provide for option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings common stock. The exercise price of each option is $40.00 per share. The options were granted to each person who was a participant in the 1997 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan in exchange for, and in cancellation of, all of the rights of

~~target~~each ~~EBITDA,~~such anparticipant ~~additional~~under ~~13 1/3%~~the of1997 ~~the~~Stock ~~optioned~~Appreciation ~~shares~~Rights ~~will vest. Effective November 2~~Plan, ~~2000~~which ~~all holders~~was ofterminated ~~options granted~~ in 1999. ~~agreed to the cancellation of~~These ~~the portion of the 1999~~ options, which were ~~not~~granted ~~vested~~by ~~at such date. Pursuant to~~ the ~~plan,~~Compensation ~~such~~Committee ~~cancelled~~of ~~options are available~~AT ~~for~~Holdings ~~new~~upon ~~grants.~~the ~~The~~recommendation ~~option~~of ~~agreement~~our ~~governing~~compensation ~~the options~~committee, ~~granted~~expire ~~under~~on ~~the plan in September~~January ~~2001~~2, ~~and March 2002 provides for vesting as follows: 33~~2015.3% atAll ~~the time~~ of ~~issuance and 33.3% on~~ the ~~anniversary date of the grant over the next two years. All~~ options granted under this ~~the~~ plan ~~expire~~ ~~ten~~were ~~years~~fully ~~from~~vested ~~the~~upon ~~date of grant~~issuance. ~~In the event that AT~~ ~~Holdings’ common stock becomes registered or traded on a~~ ~~national exchange or in the event of a change in control, all options will become exercisable in full.~~

~~Executive~~ 1998 ~~Life~~Incentive ~~Insurance~~Plan. The 1998 Incentive Plan was established to provide option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings common stock, at prices that may be more than, less than or equal to the fair market value of the shares, as the Board or Compensation Committee of AT Holdings may determine at the time of grant. Options are granted by the Compensation Committee of AT Holdings upon the recommendation of our compensation committee. There have been three option grants under the 1998 Incentive Plan, the first in 1999 with an exercise price of $100.11, the second in 2001 with an exercise price of $69.18 and the third in 2002 with an exercise price of $49.79. None of the Named Executives received option grants in 2001. The option agreement governing the options granted in 1999 provides that such options vest in 20% increments over five successive years. For any year in which the EBITDA of Argo-Tech exceeds 105% of the target EBITDA, an additional 13 1/3% of the optioned shares will vest. Effective November 2, 2000 all holders of options granted in 1999 agreed to the cancellation of the portion of the 1999 options which were not vested at such date. Pursuant to the plan, such cancelled options are available for new grants. The option agreement governing the options granted under the plan in September 2001 and March 2002 provides for vesting as follows: 33.3% at the time of issuance and 33.3% on the anniversary date of the grant over the next two years. All options granted under the plan expire ten years from the date of grant. In the event that AT Holdings common stock becomes registered or traded on a national exchange or in the event of a sales transaction (as defined in the plan) or the involuntary termination (as defined in the agreement), all options will become exercisable in full.

~~Our~~We ~~executive~~are ~~life~~evaluating ~~insurance~~other ~~plan~~stock-based ~~permits certain~~employee ~~officers~~benefit ~~and~~programs ~~key employees~~ to ~~obtain~~provide ~~life~~appropriate ~~insurance~~incentives ~~benefits~~for inour ~~addition to those generally provided to salaried employees~~workforce. ~~The~~ ~~level of coverage provided to such officers and key employees~~ ~~consists of basic term and whole life insurance coverage equal~~ ~~to 3 times the individual’s salary.~~

~~Bonus~~Executive ~~Plan~~life insurance plan

WeOur ~~have~~executive inlife ~~effect~~insurance a plan ~~pursuant~~permits ~~to which~~certain officers and ~~other~~ key ~~management~~ employees ~~may~~to ~~receive~~obtain ~~cash~~life insurance benefits in ~~bonuses~~addition ~~paid~~to ~~upon~~those ~~(1) the~~generally ~~achievement~~provided ofto ~~specified~~salaried ~~cash~~employees. The ~~flow~~level ~~goals~~of incoverage ~~the~~provided ~~preceding~~to ~~fiscal~~such ~~year~~officers and ~~(2) individual~~key employees ~~performance.~~consists ~~The~~of ~~amounts~~basic ofterm ~~such~~and ~~bonus~~whole ~~awards~~life ~~are~~insurance ~~approved~~coverage byequal ~~the~~to ATthree ~~Holdings~~times ~~Compensation~~the ~~Committee~~individual’s salary.

~~Compensation~~Management ofincentive ~~Directors~~plan

~~Since~~We ~~1999,~~have ~~Argo-Tech~~in ~~has~~effect ~~not~~a ~~compensated~~plan ~~its directors.~~pursuant ATto ~~Holdings~~which officers ~~Corporation~~and ~~pays~~other ~~its~~key ~~directors~~management ~~a quarterly~~employees ~~fee~~may ofreceive ~~$3,000~~cash bonuses ~~plus~~paid ~~$4,000~~upon ~~and~~(1) the ~~reasonable~~achievement ~~out-~~of~~-pocket expenses~~ ~~for~~specified ~~each~~cash flow ~~board~~goals ~~meeting~~in ~~attended.~~the ~~Fees~~preceding ~~paid~~fiscal ~~to Mr. Lipscomb,~~year ~~Mr. Keen~~ and ~~Ms.~~(2) Stindividual performance. ~~Clair~~The ~~for service~~amounts ~~on the board~~ of ATsuch ~~Holdings~~bonus awards are ~~included~~approved in by the ~~Summary~~ Compensation ~~table.~~Committee ~~See~~of ~~“Executive~~AT ~~Compensation~~Holdings.”

Benefits Restructuring

On January 4, 1999, AT Holdings repurchased 639,510 shares of its common stock that were held by its majority stockholder, AT Holdings, LLC. AT Holdings also issued 30,000 shares of its preferred stock on December 17, 1998. In connection with these transactions, we amended our Employee Stock Ownership Plan Excess Benefit Plan and the Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) Plan. The amendment to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan Excess Benefit Plan allowed for the transfer of approximately 4,500 shares of AT Holdings common stock in place of cash payments to members of management who have been credited with Employee Stock Ownerships Plan excess benefits as of October 31, 1998. The SAR plan provided for grants of up to 34,450 SARs, 17,225 of which were granted in fiscal years 1997 and 1998. The remaining SARs were granted in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Pursuant to the amendment of the SAR plan, all SARs became fully vested and were then converted into fully vested stock options under the 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan. In addition, all granted options under the 1991 Performance Stock Option Plan and 1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan, to the extent not vested, became fully vested upon completion of AT Holdings’ repurchase of AT Holdings, LLC’s common shares.


Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

~~Principal~~Argo-Tech ~~Stockholders~~is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT Holdings, which owns the only outstanding share of Argo-Tech’s common stock, par value $.01 per share. The following table sets forth the ownership of AT Holdings common stock, par value $.001 per share, as of October 30, 2004 by:

• each person known to Argo-Tech isto abe ~~wholly~~the ~~owned~~beneficial ~~subsidiary~~owner of more than 5% of AT Holdings, ~~which~~common ~~owns~~stock; ~~the~~• ~~only~~each ~~outstanding~~director ~~share~~ of Argo-Tech’s ~~common~~and ~~stock,~~AT ~~par~~Holdings; ~~value~~• ~~$.01~~each ~~per~~of ~~share.~~the ~~The following~~Named ~~table~~Executives; ~~sets~~and ~~forth~~• ~~the~~all ~~ownership~~ of Argo-Tech and AT Holdings~~’ common~~ ~~stock,~~directors ~~par~~and ~~value~~executive ~~$.01~~officers ~~per share,~~ as ofa ~~October 25, 2003 by:~~ group.

	•	each person known to Argo-Tech to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of AT Holdings’ common stock,
	•	each director of Argo-Tech and AT Holdings, and

On October 30, 2004, there were 653,045 shares of AT Holdings common stock outstanding, exclusive of treasury shares.

2836

• all of Argo-Tech and AT Holdings’ directors and executive officers as a group.



		Ownership at AT Holdings Common Stock

					Number of
		Number of			immediately
Name of		outstanding			exercisable options
beneficial owner		shares owned			or warrants			Total		Percent of class

GreatBanc Trust Company(1)			354,634			—			354,634		54.3%
	1301 West 22nd Street Oak Brook, IL 60523
YC International, Inc			39,000	(2)		—			39,000		6.0
	725 South Figueroa Street Suite 3870 Los Angeles, CA 90117
AT Holdings, LLC			187,452			39,000	(2)		226,452		34.7
	1390 Highway 50 East Suite 4 Carson City, NV 89701
J.P. Morgan Partners, LLC			—			46,025	(3)		46,025		7.0
	1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020
Confar, Thomas*			—			—			—		**
de Chastenet, Remi*			—			500			500		**
Dougherty, Thomas*			2,094			—			2,094		**
Keen, Paul†			19,058	(4)		12,834			31,892		4.9
Lipscomb, Michael*†			36,054	(5)		37,721			73,775		11.3
Nagata, Robert*			—			500			500		**
St. Clair, Frances*†			11,972	(6)		13,843			25,815		4.0
Storrie, Karl*			1,204			450			1,654		**
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (8 persons)			70,382			65,848			136,230		20.9

On October 25, 2003, there were 638,602 shares of AT Holdings’ common stock outstanding, exclusive of treasury shares. AT Holdings also has 30,000 shares of its preferred stock outstanding. All of these shares are held by J.P. Morgan Partners, LLC. These preferred shares have no voting rights.


*	Director of AT Holdings Corporation

**	Less than 1%

†	Director of Argo-Tech

(1)	GreatBanc Trust Company is the trustee of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The trustee holds shares of AT Holdings common stock in trust for the benefit of the ESOP. Under normal circumstances, the trustee votes all of the shares held by the ESOP in proportion to the actual voting directions of the plan participants. Under certain limited circumstances, the ESOP trustee may, in the exercise of its fiduciary duty, vote the shares held by the ESOP as a block. The share ownership numbers for officers do not include shares held through the ESOP, other than those shares directly attributed to the officer’s account.

(2)	AT Holdings, LLC has the option to purchase all of YC International’s shares of AT Holdings common stock. AT Holdings, LLC disclaims all beneficial ownership of those shares.

(3)	Represents immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 46,025 shares of AT Holdings common stock.

(4)	Includes 4,557 shares attributable to the ESOP.

(5)	Includes 4,557 shares attributable to the ESOP.

(6)	Includes 4,508 shares attributable to the ESOP.

		Ownership of AT Holdings’ common stock
							Shares
				Number of			Attributable to
		Number		Immediately			Employee Stock
Name of		Beneficially		Exercisable			Ownership
Beneficial Owner		Owned		Options			Plan Account		Total			Percent of Class
State Street Bank and Trust Company (1)			346,308		0			0		346,308			54.2
	200 Newport Avenue Quincy, MA 02171
YC International, Inc.			39,000		0			0		39,000	(2)		6.1
	725 South Figueroa Street Suite 3870 Los Angeles, CA 90117
AT Holdings, LLC			187,452		39,000	(2)		0		226,452			35.5
	1390 Highway 50 East Suite 4 Carson City, NV 89701
J.P. Morgan Partners, LLC			0		46,025			0		46,025			6.7
	1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020
Confar, Thomas*			0		0			0		0			**
de Chastenet, Remi*			0		500			0		500			**
Dougherty, Thomas*			2,094		0			0		2,094			**
Keen, Paul*†			14,181		10,612			4,041		28,834			4.4
Lipscomb, Michael*†			30,279		31,412			4,041		65,732			9.8
Nagata, Robert*			0		500			0		500			**
St. Clair, Frances†			7,216		11,612			3,992		22,820			3.5
Storrie, Karl*			1,204		450			0		1,654			**
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (8 persons)			54,974		55,086			12,074		122,134			17.3

*	Director of AT Holdings Corporation
**	Less than 1%
†	Director of Argo-Tech
(1)	GreatBanc Trust Company replaced State Street Bank and Trust Company as the trustee of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan in December 2003. The Plan trustee holds shares of AT Holdings’ common stock in trust for the benefit of the plan. Under normal circumstances, the trustee votes all of the shares held by the plan in proportion to the actual voting directions of the plan participants. Under certain limited circumstances, the plan trustee may, in the exercise of its fiduciary duty, vote the shares held by the plan as a block. The share ownership numbers for officers do not include shares held through the plan, other than those shares directly attributed to the officer’s account.
(2)	AT Holdings, LLC has the option to purchase all of YC International’s shares of AT Holdings’ common stock. AT Holdings, LLC disclaims all beneficial ownership of those shares.


Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

~~Upsilon International Corporation~~ Distribution ~~Agreement~~ agreements

Upsilon International Corporation, which we (sometimes refer to as “UIC,”) was appointed the exclusive distributor of ~~Argo-Tech~~ our engine fuel pump and certain airframe ~~air frame~~ products manufactured at our Cleveland, ~~Ohio~~ facility, first in 1990 with respect to the Japanese market, and in 1994 for the ~~entire~~ entire international market under a long-term distribution agreement. Effective December 15, 2000, UIC was also appointed an Argo-Tech non-exclusive sales agent for engine overhaul and repair and certain other product support agreements. UIC is owned by YC International, Inc., which is under the control of Mr. Masashi Yamada, a stockholder of AT Holdings ~~Corporation~~, ~~the~~our parent company, through his control of YC International and AT Holdings, LLC. We believe that this distribution agreement was entered into on terms and conditions customary for the industry in all respects with the exception of the contract term of 50 years with respect to UIC’s distribution activities, and termination provisions relating to

2937

Argo-Tech, through his control of YC International and AT Holdings, LLC. We believe that this distribution agreement was entered into on terms and conditions customary for the industry in all respects with the exception of the contract term of 50 years with respect to UIC’s distribution activities, and termination provisions relating to such distribution activities which are more favorable to UIC than industry norm. The agreement provides for a 15% discount from Argo-Tech catalog prices on all purchases of ~~Argo-Tech~~ our products by UIC and a sales commission of 5% on ~~international~~ international overhaul and repair business obtained by ~~Argo-Tech~~us after December 15, 2000. For fiscal ~~2003~~2004, sales by ~~Upsilon~~UIC accounted ~~International~~for approximately 10.9% of our net revenues. In addition, two entities controlled by Mr. Yamada serve as distributors in the Japanese military market for products manufactured by Argo-Tech Corporation Costa Mesa. For fiscal year 2004, sales to these entities accounted for approximately 121.2% of our net revenues.

Officer ~~Loans~~ loans

~~Certain~~Mr. Lipscomb ofand ~~the~~Mr. Keen ~~Named Executives~~ have entered ~~into~~ into presently outstanding recourse loan agreements with AT Holdings. The largest amount of indebtedness outstanding since ~~the~~ the beginning of fiscal ~~2003~~2004 for each ~~such Named Executive~~ was: $~~553~~579,~~542~~913 (Mr. Lipscomb) and $~~295~~306,002 (Mr. Keen). Each loan is due October 30, ~~2005~~2010 and currently accrues interest at 65.750% annually. These loans, ~~secured by a pledge of AT Holdings’ common stock,~~ were ~~extended~~used ~~for~~to ~~the~~ purchase of AT Holdings’ common stock, orand ~~for~~are ~~the~~secured ~~personal~~by ~~use~~that ofstock. ~~the Named Executive~~Mr. Lipscomb ~~Each of the Named Executives having an~~and ~~outstanding~~Mr. Keen ~~loan~~have ~~has~~each entered into a pledge agreement and promissory note with AT Holdings in connection with ~~such~~these loans. We believe that the terms of these loans are no less favorable to AT Holdings than would have been available pursuant to arms’ length negotiations with unaffiliated parties.

Purchase of senior ~~Senior~~subordinated ~~Subordinated Notes~~notes

On November 22, 2002, Mr. Lipscomb, Ms. St. Clair and eight other key management employees purchased a total of $1,000,000 in principal amount of our 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes. These notes were ~~purchased~~ purchased in an open market transaction arranged by Deutsche ~~Bank~~ Bank Securities for a total purchase price of $700,000 plus ~~accrued~~ accrued interest from October 1, 2002 through November 22, 2002. Mr. Lipscomb purchased $652,000 in principal amount of notes through the Argo-Tech Corporation ~~Trust~~ Trust Agreement, dated October 28, 1994, which was amended ~~effective~~ effective November 22, 2002, to permit this purchase of notes. Ms. St. Clair purchased $130,000 in principal amount of notes. These notes were purchased or redeemed in connection with the Refinancing.

Warrants for AT Holdings’ common stock

Simultaneously with its purchase of the Holdings Preferred Stock in December 1998, J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC received immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 46,025 shares, or 7.0% as of October 30, 2004, of AT Holdings common stock. The warrants entitle J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC to certain registration, tag-along, preemptive, board observation and mandatory redemption rights. In connection with a mandatory redemption, if AT Holdings does not have sufficient cash available to pay the redemption price in full, or is prohibited from doing so because of a restriction in its then existing debt or preferred stock instruments, it will be required to use its best efforts to arrange debt or equity financing or to effect a consent solicitation or a refinancing, as the case may be. Furthermore, if a leverage ratio threshold is exceeded upon our incurrence of additional indebtedness, AT Holdings is required to issue to J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC additional warrants to purchase an additional number of shares of AT Holdings common stock aggregating to 3% of the fully-diluted common stock of AT Holdings. As part of the Refinancing, AT Holdings redeemed all of the outstanding shares of Holdings Preferred Stock. This redemption was funded by a cash dividend from us. In connection with this redemption, J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC, waived certain rights contained in the warrants, preferred stock and related purchase agreements, including certain of those described above.

AT Holdings stockholders’ agreement

On December 17, 1998, AT Holdings, Sunhorizon International, AT Holdings, LLC, YC International, J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC and representatives of Argo-Tech’s management and director investors entered into the AT Holdings stockholders’ agreement. Argo-Tech is not a party to the AT Holdings stockholders’ agreement. The AT Holdings stockholders’ agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including

transfer restrictions, registration rights, tagalong rights and rights of first refusal and provides that the stockholders party thereto will vote for:


	•	director nominees designated by the management and director investors, comprising a majority of the Board of Directors of AT Holdings; and

	•	director nominees designated by Mr. Masashi Yamada, who controls AT Holdings, LLC and YC International, each a significant stockholder of AT Holdings, which will comprise a minority of the Board of Directors of AT Holdings.

Although J.P. Morgan Partners (SBIC), LLC does not have the right to nominate a voting director nominee, it has the right to designate one non-voting representative to attend all AT Holdings Board of Directors and committee meetings.

The management and director investors party to the AT Holdings stockholders’ agreement have the right, upon termination of their employment or directorship, as the case may be, to put to AT Holdings all but not part of their shares of AT Holdings common stock for a per share purchase price equal to the greater of (i) the most recent valuation of our independent consultant or (ii) the sale price of AT Holdings common stock in any transaction within the preceding year in which 10% or more of AT Holdings common stock was sold.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits,; Financial ~~Statement~~Statements Schedules~~, and Reports on Form 8-K~~.

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements of the Company are included in a separate section of this report following the signature page:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets —as of October 2630, ~~2002~~2004 and October 25, 2003 Consolidated Statements of Net Income —(Loss) For the Fiscal Years ended October 2730, ~~2001~~2004, October 2625, ~~2002~~2003 and October 2526, ~~2003~~2002 Consolidated Statements of ~~Cash~~Shareholder’s ~~Flows~~Equity/(Deficiency) —for the Fiscal Years ended October 2730, ~~2001~~2004, October 2625, ~~2002~~2003 and October 2526, ~~2003~~2002 Consolidated Statements of ~~Shareholder’s~~Cash ~~Equity/(Deficiency)~~Flows —For the Fiscal Years ended October 2730, ~~2001~~2004, October 2625, ~~2002~~2003 and October 2526, ~~2003~~2002 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements —for the Fiscal Years ended October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003 ~~Report~~and ofOctober ~~Independent~~26, ~~Auditors~~2002

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

NoThe ~~schedule~~following orfinancial ~~schedules~~statement ~~for~~schedule ~~which provision~~ is ~~made~~included in ~~the~~a ~~applicable~~separate ~~accounting~~section ~~regulations~~ of ~~the~~this ~~Securities and~~report ~~Exchange~~following ~~Commission are required, or such schedules are not~~the ~~applicable,~~signature ~~and therefore, have been omitted.~~page:

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Fiscal Years ended October 30 , 2004, October 25, 2003 and October 26, 2002

(a)(3) Exhibits

Exhibit
Number		Description of ~~Document~~Exhibit (and document from which incorporated by reference, if applicable)
	3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ~~the Company~~Argo-Tech, dated April 16, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of ~~the Company~~Argo-Tech’s registration statement on form S-4/ A filed April 22, 1999, SEC File No. 333-73179).
	3.2	Restated By-Laws of ~~the~~Argo-Tech ~~Company~~ dated April 16, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of ~~the Company~~Argo-Tech’s registration statement on form S-4/ A filed April 22, 1999, SEC File No. 333-73179).
	4.1	Indenture dated ~~September~~June 2623, ~~1997~~2004, between ~~the Company~~Argo-Tech, the Subsidiary Guarantors signatory thereto and ~~Harris~~BNY Midwest Trust ~~and Savings Bank~~Company, as Trustee, relating to the 89 51/84% Senior ~~Subordinated~~ Notes due ~~2007~~2010 (the form of which is included in such Indenture) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of ~~the Company~~Argo-Tech’s ~~Registration~~quarterly ~~Statement~~report on form S10-1,Q ~~filed~~for ~~October~~the 17quarter ended July 31, ~~1997~~2004, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	4.2	First Supplemental Indenture, dated December 17, 1998 between the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors signatory thereto and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, related to the Indenture dated September 26, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 14, 1999).
	10.1*	Form of Stay Pay and Severance Agreement dated June 6, 1996, between Argo-Tech and certain Executive Officers of Argo-Tech (Michael S. Lipscomb, Frances S. St. Clair, and Paul R. Keen) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	4.3	Indenture dated December 17, 1998 between the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors signatory thereto and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Trustee, related to the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 (a form of which is included in such Indenture) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 14, 1999).
	10.2*	Employment Agreement dated February 13, 1989 between Argo-Tech and Paul R. Keen (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.1*	Form of Stay Pay and Severance Agreement dated June 6, 1996, between the Company and certain Executive Officers of the Company (Michael S. Lipscomb, Frances S. St. Clair, and Paul R. Keen) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.3*	Employment Agreement dated October 15, 1986 between Argo-Tech and Michael S. Lipscomb (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.2*	Employment Agreement dated February 13, 1989 between the Company and Paul R. Keen (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.3*	Employment Agreement dated October 15, 1986 between the Company and Michael S. Lipscomb (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.4*	Argo-Tech Corporation Trust Agreement dated October 28, 1994 between the Company and Society National Bank, as Trustee, relating to the Employment Agreement dated October 15, 1986 between the Company and Michael S. Lipscomb (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.5*	Argo-Tech Corporation Salaried Pension Plan, dated November 1, 1995 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333- 38223).
	10.6*	First Amendment to Argo-Tech Corporation Salaried Pension Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333- 38223).
	10.7*	Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement, dated May 17, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.8*	First Amendment to the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement, dated October 26, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.9*	Second Amendment to the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement, dated May 9, 1996 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).

3140

Exhibit
Number			Description of ~~Document~~Exhibit (and document from which incorporated by reference, if applicable)
	10.10	*	Third Amendment to the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement, dated July 18, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.4*		Argo-Tech Corporation Trust Agreement dated October 28, 1994 between Argo-Tech and Society National Bank, as Trustee, relating to the Employment Agreement dated October 15, 1986 between Argo-Tech and Michael S. Lipscomb (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.11	*	Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan Excess Benefit Plan, dated May 17, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.5*		Argo-Tech Corporation Salaried Pension Plan, dated November 1, 1995 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.12		AT Holdings Corporation Stockholders’ Agreement, dated December 17, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 1999, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.6*		First Amendment to Argo-Tech Corporation Salaried Pension Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.13		AT Holdings Corporation 1998 Supplemental Stockholders’ Agreement, dated December 17, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Company’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 1999, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.7*		Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement, dated May 17, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.14	*	Form of Management Incentive Compensation Plan for key employees of Argo-Tech (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.8*		First Amendment to the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement, dated October 26, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.15	*	1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, dated May 16, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.9*		Second Amendment to the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement, dated May 9, 1996 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.16	*	Amendment to the 1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, dated June 12, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2001).
	10.10	*	Third Amendment to the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement, dated July 18, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.17	*	Form of Stock Option Agreement in connection with the Management Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, between Argo-Tech and each member of Argo-Tech’s Executive Staff (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.11	*	Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan Excess Benefit Plan, dated May 17, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.18	*	1991 Performance Stock Option Plan, as amended, dated May 16, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333- 38223).
	10.12		AT Holdings Corporation Stockholders’ Agreement, dated December 17, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of Argo-Tech’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 1999, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.19	*	Amendment to the 1991 Performance Stock Option Plan, as amended, June 12, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2001).
	10.13		AT Holdings Corporation 1998 Supplemental Stockholders’ Agreement, dated December 17, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of Argo-Tech’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended October 30, 1999, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.20	*	Form of Stock Option Agreement in connection with the 1991 Performance Stock Option Plan, as amended, between Argo-Tech and certain key employees (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.14	*	Form of Management Incentive Compensation Plan for key employees of Argo-Tech (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.21		Credit Facility, dated July 18, 1997, as amended and restated on September 26, 1997, between Argo-Tech, AT Holdings, the lenders party thereto and the Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.15	*	1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, dated May 16, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.22		Distributorship Agreement, dated December 24, 1990, between Argo-Tech, Yamada Corporation and Vestar Capital Partners, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.16	*	Amendment to the 1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, dated June 12, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Argo-Tech’s Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2001)
	10.23		Japan Distributorship Agreement, dated December 24, 1990, between Argo-Tech, Aerotech World Trade Corporation, Yamada Corporation, Yamada International Corporation and Vestar Capital Partners, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.17	*	Form of Stock Option Agreement in connection with the Management Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, between Argo-Tech and each member of Argo-Tech’s Executive Staff (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.18	*	1991 Performance Stock Option Plan, as amended, dated May 16, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)

3241

Exhibit
Number			Description of ~~Document~~Exhibit (and document from which incorporated by reference, if applicable)
	10.24		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 1, 1997, between Argo-Tech, J.C. Carter Company, Inc., Robert L. Veloz, Individually and as Trustee, Marlene J. Veloz, Individually and as Trustee, Edith T. Derbyshire, Individually and as Trustee, Harry S. Derbyshire, Individually and as Trustee, Michael Veloz, Katherine Canfield and Maureen Partch, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.19	*	Amendment to the 1991 Performance Stock Option Plan, as amended, June 12, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Argo-Tech’s Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2001)
	10.25		Prism Prototype Retirement Plan & Trust & 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan Adoption Agreement, dated November 1, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.20	*	Form of Stock Option Agreement in connection with the 1991 Performance Stock Option Plan, as amended, between Argo-Tech and certain key employees (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.26		Prism Prototype Retirement Plan and Trust (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.21		Amended and Restated Credit Facility, dated June 23, 2004, by and among Argo-Tech Corporation, the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and National City Bank, as administrative agent. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Argo-Tech’s quarterly report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.27		Agreement of Purchase and Sale between Agnem Holdings, Inc. and TRW Inc. dated as of August 5, 1986 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.22		First Amendment, dated as of January 19, 2005, to Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2004, by and among Argo-Tech Corporation, AT Holdings Corporation, National City Bank, as administrative agent and an issuing bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as an issuing bank with respect to existing letters of credit issued thereunder and the other lenders signatory thereto. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Argo-Tech’s current report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2005, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.28	*	1997 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Company’s Annual Report on form 10-K, for the year ended October 31, 1998).
	10.23		Distributorship Agreement, dated December 24, 1990, between Argo-Tech, Yamada Corporation and Vestar Capital Partners, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.29	*	AT Holdings Corporation/Argo-Tech Corporation 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Company’s registration statement on form S-4 filed March 1, 1999, SEC File No. 333-73179).
	10.24		Japan Distributorship Agreement, dated December 24, 1990, between Argo-Tech, Aerotech World Trade Corporation, Yamada Corporation, Yamada International Corporation and Vestar Capital Partners, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.30	*	Amendment to the AT Holdings Corporation/Argo-Tech Corporation 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan dated June 12, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2001).
	10.25		Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 1, 1997, between Argo-Tech, J.C. Carter Company, Inc., Robert L. Veloz, Individually and as Trustee, Marlene J. Veloz, Individually and as Trustee, Edith T. Derbyshire, Individually and as Trustee, Harry S. Derbyshire, Individually and as Trustee, Michael Veloz, Katherine Canfield and Maureen Partch, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.31	*	Form of Stock Option Agreement in connection with the AT Holdings Corporation/Argo-Tech Corporation 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the Company’s registration statement on form S-4 filed March 1, 1999, SEC File No. 333- 73179).
	10.26		Prism Prototype Retirement Plan & Trust & 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan Adoption Agreement, dated November 1, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.32	*	First Amendment to the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan Excess Benefit Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Company’s registration statement on form S-4 filed March 1, 1999, SEC File No. 333-73179).
	10.27		Prism Prototype Retirement Plan and Trust (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.33		Amendment, dated December 4, 1998 to the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, dated July 18, 1997, as amended and restated on September 26, 1997, between Argo-Tech, AT Holdings Corporation, the Lenders party thereto and Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Company’s registration statement on form S-4/A filed April 22, 1999, SEC File No. 333-73179).
	10.28		Agreement of Purchase and Sale between Agnem Holdings, Inc. and TRW Inc. dated as of August 5, 1986 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of Argo-Tech’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223)
	10.34		Amendment, dated June 9, 2000 to the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, dated July 18, 1997, as amended and restated on September 26, 1997, between Argo-Tech, AT Holdings Corporation, the Lenders party thereto and Chase Manhattan Bank, as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended October 28, 2000).
	10.29	*	1997 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of Argo-Tech’s Annual Report on form 10-K, for the year ended October 31, 1998)
	10.35		Amendment, dated October 26, 2002 to the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, dated July 18, 1997, as amended and restated on September 26, 1997, between Argo-Tech, AT Holdings Corporation, the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent.
	10.30	*	AT Holdings Corporation/ Argo-Tech Corporation 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of Argo-Tech’s registration statement on form S-4 filed March 1, 1999, SEC File No. 333-73179)
	10.36		Amendment, dated January 24, 2003 to the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, dated July 18, 1997, as amended and restated on January 24, 2003, between Argo-Tech, AT Holdings Corporation, the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 25, 2003).
	10.31	*	Amendment to the AT Holdings Corporation/ Argo-Tech Corporation 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan dated June 12, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Argo-Tech’s Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2001)
	10.37	*	Amendment, dated November 22, 2002, to Argo-Tech Corporation Trust Agreement, dated October 28, 1994.
	12**		Statement regarding computation of ratios.

3342

Exhibit
Number			Description of ~~Document~~Exhibit (and document from which incorporated by reference, if applicable)
	21		List of Subsidiaries (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21 of the Company’s Registration Statement on form S-1, filed October 17, 1997, SEC File No. 333-38223).
	10.32	*	Form of Stock Option Agreement in connection with the AT Holdings Corporation/ Argo-Tech Corporation 1998 Equity Replacement Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Argo-Tech’s registration statement on form S-4 filed March 1, 1999, SEC File No. 333-73179)
	31**		Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	10.33	*	First Amendment to the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan Excess Benefit Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of Argo-Tech’s registration statement on form S-4 filed March 1, 1999, SEC File No. 333-73179)
	32**		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	10.34	*	Amendment, dated November 22, 2002, to Argo-Tech Corporation Trust Agreement, dated October 28, 1994 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of Argo-Tech’s annual report on form 10-K for the year ended October 26, 2002, SEC File No. 333-73179)
	10.35		Distribution Agreement, dated April 1, 2003, between Argo-Tech Corporation and Yamada Corporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of Argo-Tech’s registration statement on form S-4 filed September 23, 2004, SEC File No. 333-119227)
	12.1*	*	Statement re Computation of Ratios
	21.1		List of Subsidiaries (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21.1 of Argo-Tech’s registration statement on form S-4 filed September 23, 2004, SEC File No. 333-119227)
	31**		Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	32**		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*	~~Reflects~~Denotes management contract or other compensatory arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 14(c) of this ~~Report~~report.
**	Filed herewith.
(b)	We did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2003.

~~(c) The exhibits which are listed under Item 15(a)(3) are filed or incorporated by reference herein.~~43

(d) No financial statement schedules are required to be filed herein, therefore, none are listed under Item 15(a)(2).

Supplemental Information to be furnished with reports filed pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants which have not registered securities pursuant to Section 12 of the Act

No annual report or proxy statement covering our last fiscal year has been or will be circulated to security holders.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, ~~the~~ ~~registrant~~Argo-Tech Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Cleveland, state of Ohio, on January 27, 2005.


	ARGO-TECH CORPORATION

By: /s/ ~~FRANCES~~PAUL SR. ~~ST. CLAIR~~KEEN

~~Frances~~Name: S.Paul StR. ~~Clair~~Keen Title: Executive Vice President, ~~and~~General ~~Chief~~Counsel, ~~Financial~~Secretary ~~Officer~~and ~~Date: January 22, 2004~~Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed ~~below~~ by the following persons ~~on behalf of the registrant and~~ in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE	TITLE	DATE
/s/ MICHAEL S. LIPSCOMB Michael S. Lipscomb	Chairman, ~~President and~~ Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	January 2227, ~~2004~~2005
/s/ FRANCES S. ST. CLAIR Frances S. St. Clair	Executive Vice President, ~~and~~ Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)	January 2227, ~~2004~~2005
/s/ PAUL R. KEEN Paul R. Keen	Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Director	January 2227, ~~2004~~2005
/s/ PAUL A. SKLAD Paul A. Sklad	Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)	January 2227, ~~2004~~2005

3544

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K:

FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 25 30, ~~2003~~ 2004

ITEM 8 AND ITEM 15(a)(1)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX


	Page

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		F-1
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF OCTOBER 30, 2004 AND OCTOBER 25, 2003		F-2
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME/(LOSS) FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2004, OCTOBER 25, 2003 AND OCTOBER 26, 2002		F-3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY) FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2004, OCTOBER 25, 2003 AND OCTOBER 26, 2002		F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2004, OCTOBER 25, 2003 AND OCTOBER 26, 2002		F-5
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2004, OCTOBER 25, 2003 AND OCTOBER 26, 2002		F-6–F-26
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA:
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 30, 2004, OCTOBER 25, 2003 AND OCTOBER 26, 2002		F-27

~~ARGO-TECH~~REPORT ~~CORPORATION~~OF ~~AND~~INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ~~SUBSIDIARIES~~ACCOUNTING FIRM

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT		F-1
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF OCTOBER 25, 2003 AND OCTOBER 26, 2002		F-2
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 25, 2003, OCTOBER 26, 2002 AND OCTOBER 27, 2001		F-3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY) FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 25, 2003, OCTOBER 26, 2002 AND OCTOBER 27, 2001		F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 25, 2003, OCTOBER 26, 2002 AND OCTOBER 27, 2001		F-5
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 25, 2003, OCTOBER 26, 2002 AND OCTOBER 27, 2001		F-6–F-21

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Shareholder and Board of Directors

of Argo-Tech Corporation and subsidiaries

(a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Argo-Tech Corporation and subsidiaries (a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation) (the “Company”) as of October 2530, ~~2003~~2004 and October 2625, ~~2002~~2003, and the related consolidated statements of net income/(loss), shareholder’s equity/(deficiency) , and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 2530, ~~2003~~2004. ~~These~~Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with ~~auditing~~ the standards ~~generally~~of ~~accepted~~the inPublic ~~the~~Company ~~United~~Accounting ~~States~~Oversight ofBoard ~~America~~(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial ~~examining,~~reporting onas a ~~test~~ basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, ~~evidence~~but ~~supporting~~not for the ~~amounts~~purpose ~~and~~of ~~disclosures~~expressing inan opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial ~~statements~~reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of October 2530, ~~2003~~2004 and October 2625, ~~2002~~2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 2530, ~~2003~~2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, effective October 28, 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill as a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

January 1624, ~~2004~~2005

F-1

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

October 25 30, ~~2003~~2004 and October 26 25, ~~2002~~2003

					2003				2002
				2004				2003
				(In thousands, except	~~(In thousands, except~~
				share data)	~~share data)~~
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents			$	$15,857	~~14,057~~		$	$14,057	~~17,769~~
	Receivables, net				29,013	~~28,335~~			28,335	~~24,550~~
	Income tax receivable				1,203	~~3,500~~			3,500	~~3,274~~
	Inventories					25,701				25,123
	Inventories, net				28,557				25,701
	Deferred income taxes and prepaid expenses				6,245	~~5,352~~			5,352	~~5,002~~
		Total current assets	~~Total current assets~~		80,875	~~76,945~~			76,945	~~75,718~~
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation					23,213	~~23,956~~			23,956	~~26,204~~
GOODWILL, net of accumulated amortization					110,059	~~110,059~~			110,059	~~110,059~~
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization					31,502	~~34,916~~			34,916	~~38,331~~
OTHER ASSETS					8,613	~~9,921~~			9,921	~~10,021~~
Total Assets				$	$254,262	~~255,797~~		$	$255,797	~~260,333~~
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current portion of long-term debt			$	$750	~~12,000~~		$	$12,000	~~16,000~~
	Accounts payable				9,396	~~7,254~~			7,254	~~5,252~~
	Accrued liabilities				28,766	~~22,757~~			22,757	~~21,114~~
		Total current liabilities	~~Total current liabilities~~		38,912	~~42,011~~			42,011	~~42,366~~
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities					264,063	~~207,349~~			207,349	~~219,045~~
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES					21,306	~~21,753~~			21,753	~~21,720~~
		Total Liabilities	~~Total Liabilities~~		324,281	~~271,113~~			271,113	~~283,131~~
REDEEMABLE ESOP STOCK					40,957	~~15,452~~			15,452	~~11,355~~
	Unearned ESOP stock				—	~~(840~~	)		(840	~~(2,520~~)	)
						14,612				8,835
					40,957				14,612
SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY):
	Common Stock, $.01 par value, authorized 3,000 shares; 1 share issued and outstanding				—	—			—	—
	Paid-in capital				—	—			—	—
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss				(3,315	~~(2,143~~)	)		(2,143	~~(3,235~~)	)
	Accumulated deficit				(107,661	~~(27,785~~)	)		(27,785	~~(28,398~~)	)
		Total shareholder’s equity/(deficiency)			(110,976	~~(29,928~~)	)		(29,928	~~(31,633~~)	)
Total Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity/(Deficiency)				$	$254,262	~~255,797~~		$	$255,797	~~260,333~~

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

F-2

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET INCOME/(LOSS)

For the Fiscal Years Ended October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003~~, October~~ ~~26, 2002~~ and October 27 26, ~~2001~~2002

		2003			2002			2001
		2004			2003			2002
		(In thousands)
Net revenues		$	~~160~~187,~~726~~328		$	~~155~~160,~~303~~726		$	~~173~~155,~~208~~303
Cost of revenues			94109,~~535~~203			8894,~~669~~535			9488,~~175~~669
	Gross profit		6678,~~191~~125			66,~~634~~191			7966,~~033~~634
Selling, general and administrative			2631,~~417~~166			2326,~~359~~417			23,~~094~~359
Research and development			911,~~525~~934			119,~~722~~525			1011,~~265~~722
Amortization of intangible assets			3,414			3,~~721~~414			73,~~515~~721
	Operating expenses		3946,~~356~~514			3839,~~802~~356			4038,~~874~~802
Income from operations			2631,~~835~~611			2726,~~832~~835			3827,~~159~~832
Interest expense			2122,~~257~~705			21,~~434~~257			2421,~~534~~434
Other, net			(529	)		(97	)		(51	)
Debt extinguishment expense			12,961			—			—
Income before income taxes			6,107			6,495			13,676
Other, net			(95	)		(529	)		(97	)
Income tax provision			1,579			569			2,876
Income/(loss) before income taxes			(3,960	)		6,107			6,495
Net income		$	4,528		$	5,926		$	10,800
Income tax (benefit)/provision			(3,499	)		1,579			569
Net income/(loss)		$	(461	)	$	4,528		$	5,926

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

F-3

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY)

For the Fiscal Years Ended October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003~~, October~~ ~~26, 2002~~ and October 27 26,~~2001~~ 2002

					Accumulated
	Common		Paid-In		Comprehensive			Accumulated
	Stock		Capital		Income / (Loss)			Deficit			Total
	(In thousands)
BALANCE, OCTOBER 28, 2000	$	—	$	—	$	31		$	(58,873	)	$	(58,842	)
BALANCE, OCTOBER 27, 2001	$	—	$	—	$	(1,948	)	$	(40,171	)	$	(42,119	)
Net income									10,800			10,800
Additional minimum pension liability						(1,828	)					(1,828	)
Reduction of redeemable ESOP stock									9,081			9,081
Dividend									(1,661	)		(1,661	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment						(151	)					(151	)
Activity related to stock options									526			526
Other, net									(44	)		(44	)
BALANCE, OCTOBER 27, 2001		—		—		(1,948	)		(40,171	)		(42,119	)
Net income									5,926			5,926
Additional minimum pension liability						(1,273	)					(1,273	)
Reduction of redeemable ESOP stock									6,504			6,504
Dividend									(578	)		(578	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment						(14	)					(14	)
Other, net									(79	)		(79	)
BALANCE, OCTOBER 26, 2002		—		—		(3,235	)		(28,398	)		(31,633	)
Net income									4,528			4,528
Reduction of minimum pension liability						973						973
Accretion of redeemable ESOP stock									(3,903	)		(3,903	)
Dividend									(222	)		(222	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment						119						119
Other, net									210			210
BALANCE, OCTOBER 25, 2003	$	—	$	—	$	(2,143	)	$	(27,785	)	$	(29,928	)
Net loss									(461	)		(461	)
Additional minimum pension liability						(1,179	)					(1,179	)
Accretion of redeemable ESOP stock									(23,918	)		(23,918	)
Contributed redeemable ESOP stock									2,425			2,425
Dividend									(59,046	)		(59,046	)
Change in supplemental employee retirement plan									1,123			1,123
Foreign currency translation adjustment						7						7
Other, net									1			1
BALANCE, OCTOBER 30, 2004	$	—	$	—	$	(3,315	)	$	(107,661	)	$	(110,976	)

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

F-4

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Fiscal Years Ended October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003~~, October~~ ~~26, 2002~~ and October 27 26, ~~2001~~2002

					2003				2002				2001
				2004				2003				2002
				(In thousands)	~~(In thousands)~~
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net income				$	4,528			$	5,926			$	10,800
	Net income/(loss)			$	(461	)		$	4,528			$	5,926
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Depreciation	~~Depreciation~~			3,799	~~4,187~~			4,187	~~4,608~~			4,608	~~5,559~~
	Amortization of intangible assets and deferred financing costs	~~Amortization of intangible assets and deferred financing costs~~			5,376	~~5,866~~			5,866	~~5,779~~			5,779	~~9,655~~
	Accretion of bond discount	~~Accretion of bond discount~~			219	~~304~~			304	~~277~~			277	~~252~~
		Compensation expense recognized in connection with employee stock ownership plan				1,874				1,344				2,091
	Debt extinguishment expense				12,961
		Compensation expense recognized in connection with stock options												526
	Compensation expense recognized in connection with employee stock ownership plan				4,851				1,874				1,344
		Deferred pension cost				731				(1,375	)			(2,299	)
	Compensation expense recognized in connection with supplemental employee retirement plan				1,123
		Deferred income taxes				(578	)			(1,658	)			(1,962	)
	Deferred pension cost				(912	)			731				(1,375	)
		Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
	Deferred income taxes				(2,150	)			(1,227	)			(808	)
			Receivables			(4,010	)			8,112				(8,928	)
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
			Inventories			(578	)			3,738				1,254
		Receivables			1,619				(4,010	)			8,112
			Prepaid expenses			(348	)			307				301
		Inventories			(2,856	)			(578	)			3,738
			Accounts payable			2,002				412				(150	)
		Prepaid expenses			(135	)			(348	)			307
			Accrued and other liabilities			1,571				3,284				1,161
		Accounts payable			2,142				2,002				412
		Other, net				124				(30	)			(197	)
		Accrued and other liabilities			7,639				2,220				2,434
	Net cash provided by operating activities					15,673				30,724				18,063
		Other, net			15				124				(30	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Net cash provided by operating activities				33,230				15,673				30,724
	Capital expenditures					(1,939	)			(1,785	)			(1,885	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Net cash used in investing activities					(1,939	)			(1,785	)			(1,885	)
	Capital expenditures				(3,056	)			(1,939	)			(1,785	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Net cash used in investing activities				(3,056	)			(1,939	)			(1,785	)
	Repayment of long-term debt					(16,000	)			(18,612	)			(11,634	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Payment of financing related fees					(1,224	)			(37	)
	Sale of senior notes				250,000
	Purchase of AT Holdings stock from former ESOP participants					(273	)			(526	)			(1,584	)
	Purchase of senior subordinated notes				(200,571	)
	Other, net					51				(52	)			(77	)
	Additional borrowing of long term debt				15,000
	Net cash used in financing activities					(17,446	)			(19,227	)			(13,295	)
	Repayment of long-term debt				(26,038	)			(16,000	)			(18,612	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
	Payment of financing related fees				(7,719	)			(1,224	)			(37	)
Net increase (decrease) for the period						(3,712	)			9,712				2,883
	Purchase of AT Holdings stock from former ESOP participants				(567	)			(273	)			(526	)
Balance, Beginning of period						17,769				8,057				5,174
	Dividend to AT Holdings				(58,479	)
Balance, End of period					$	14,057			$	17,769			$	8,057
	Other, net				—				51				(52	)
	Net cash used in financing activities				(28,374	)			(17,446	)			(19,227	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Net increase (decrease) for the period					1,800				(3,712	)			9,712
Balance, beginning of period					14,057				17,769				8,057
Balance, end of period				$	15,857			$	14,057			$	17,769

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

F-5

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Fiscal Years Ended October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003~~, October~~ ~~26, 2002~~ and October 27 26, ~~2001~~2002


1.	Basis of Presentation

The principal operations of Argo-Tech Corporation (a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation) and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) include the design, manufacture and distribution of aviation products, primarily aircraft fuel pumps~~, throughout the world~~. In addition, ~~the Company~~Argo-Tech leases a portion of its Cleveland, Ohio manufacturing facility to other parties. Argo-Tech’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in October. The fiscal ~~years~~year ended October 2530, ~~2003,~~2004 consisted of 53 weeks and the fiscal years ended October 2625, 2003 ~~2002~~ and October 2726, ~~2001~~2002 consisted of 52 weeks. Argo-Tech is obligated to fulfill certain obligations of AT Holdings Corporation to purchase AT Holdings’ common stock in accordance with the provisions of the Argo-Tech Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan. As a result, ~~those~~that ~~obligations~~obligation ~~have~~ has been reflected in ~~the~~its ~~Company’s~~ financial statements. Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior years’ financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Argo-Tech Corporation is a parent, holding company and ~~with~~all ~~four~~of ~~wholly-owned~~its ~~operating~~domestic subsidiaries ~~that~~ guarantee Argo-Tech’s senior ~~subordinated~~ notes. Argo-Tech also has two wholly-owned, non-guarantor foreign subsidiaries which have inconsequential assets, liabilities and equity. Argo-Tech has no outside assets, liabilities or operations apart from its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The senior ~~subordinated~~ notes (Note 12) are fully, unconditionally, jointly and severally guaranteed by the guarantor subsidiaries, and therefore, separate financial statements of the guarantor subsidiaries will not be presented. Management has determined that the information presented by such separate financial statements is not material to investors.


2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company. All material intercompany accounts and transactions between the wholly-owned subsidiaries have been eliminated.

Cash Equivalents — Cash equivalents represent short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

Receivables — The Company ~~does~~evaluates ~~not~~the collectibility ~~generally~~of its trade receivables based on a combination ~~require~~of ~~collateral~~factors. orThe ~~other~~Company ~~security~~regularly analyzes its customer accounts, and when it becomes aware of a specific customer’s inability to ~~guarantee~~meet ~~trade~~its financial obligation to us, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings, the Company immediately records a bad debt expense and reduces the related receivable to the amount it reasonably believes is collectible. The Company estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of the accounts receivable, customer creditworthiness and historical experience. Its estimate of the allowance amounts includes amounts for specifically identified losses and a general amount for estimated losses. If circumstances change or economic conditions deteriorate, the Company’s estimates of the recoverability of receivables could be further adjusted.

Inventories — The Company’s inventory purchases and commitments are made in order to build inventory to meet future shipment schedules based on forecasted demand for our products. Inventories are stated at ~~standard cost~~the ~~which~~lower ~~approximates~~of ~~the~~cost ~~costs~~or market, ~~which~~with ~~would~~cost bebeing determined ~~using~~ on the first-in, first-out, or (FIFO), method. ~~The~~Periodically, ~~recorded~~the ~~value~~Company performs a detailed assessment of ~~inventories~~inventory, iswhich ~~not~~includes ina ~~excess~~review of, ~~market~~among other factors, historical sales activity, future demand requirements, product life cycle and development plans and quality issues. Based on this analysis, the Company records provisions for potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory to reflect inventory at net realizable value. These provisions could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual requirements based upon future economic conditions, customer inventory levels or competitive factors that were not foreseen, or did not exist, when the valuation allowances were established.

F-6

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Property and Equipment — Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line or an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives as follows:


Buildings and improvements			7 to 30 years
Equipment			3 to 10 years

Goodwill and Intangible Assets — Goodwill ~~represents~~and identified intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the ~~excess~~date of acquisition. Intangible assets other than goodwill are recognized if the benefit ~~cost~~of the intangible asset is obtained through contractual or other legal rights, or if the intangible asset can be sold, transferred, licensed or exchanged, regardless of ~~companies~~our ~~acquired~~intent to do so. Intangible assets, such as goodwill, that have an indefinite useful life are not amortized. All other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company reviews goodwill and purchased intangible assets for impairment annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the ~~fair~~carrying value of ~~their~~an ~~net~~asset may not be recoverable. The asset impairment review assesses the fair value of the assets atbased on the ~~dates~~future cash flows the assets are expected to generate. This approach uses the Company’s estimate of ~~acquisition~~future market growth, forecasted revenue and costs and appropriate discount rates. When impairment is identified, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value.

~~Intangible Assets —~~ In conjunction with the acquisition of Argo-Tech Corporation Costa Mesa in 1997, the Company recognized identified intangible assets, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives as follows:


Contracts			10 Years
Spare Parts Annuity			10-28 Years
Patents			14-17 Years

Deferred Financing Costs — The costs of obtaining financing are included in Other Assets in the ~~Consolidated~~consolidated ~~Balance~~balance ~~Sheet~~sheets and are amortized over the terms of the financing. The ~~amortized~~cost balance at October 30, 2004 and October 25, 2003 was $7,719,000 and $19,549,000, respectively. The amortized cost is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of net income/(loss). Accumulated amortization at October 30, 2004 and October 25, 2003 was $376,000 and $11,856,000, respectively.

~~F-6~~ Redeemable Stock — Redeemable ESOP Stock has been excluded from Shareholder’s Equity/(Deficiency) due to the ability of the holders of AT Holdings common stock to “put”, subject to certain restrictions, the shares to the Company. The increase/(decrease) in the Redeemable ESOP Stock has been recorded in Accumulated Deficit.

Foreign Currency Translation — Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange, while revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the year. Adjustments from translating foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements are excluded from the consolidated statements of net income/(loss) and are reported as a component of shareholder’s equity/(deficiency).

Derivative Financial Instruments — All derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swap contracts and foreign exchange contracts, are recognized in the financial statements and measured at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding them. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or shareholders’ equity (as a component of comprehensive income), depending on whether the derivative is being used to hedge changes in fair value or cash flows. At October 30, 2004 the Company did not have any open derivative contracts.

Revenue Recognition — Revenues are generally recognized when goods are shipped or services provided, at which time title and risk of loss passes to the customer. Substantially all sales are made pursuant to firm, fixed-

F-7

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~interest~~price ~~expense~~purchase inorders ~~the~~received ~~consolidated~~from ~~statements~~customers. We have executed long-term supply agreements with certain of ~~net~~our OEM ~~income~~customers. ~~Accumulated~~These ~~amortization~~agreements require Argo-Tech to supply all the amounts ordered by the customers during the term of the agreements (generally three to five years) at ~~October 25~~specified prices. Under certain of these agreements, ~~2003~~we expect to incur losses. Provisions for estimating losses on these contracts are made in the period in which such losses are identified based on cost and pricing ~~October 26,~~information ~~2002~~and ~~was~~estimated ~~$11,856,000,~~future shipment quantities provided by the customer. The cumulative effect of revisions to estimated losses on contracts is recorded in the accounting period in which the amounts become known and $9can be reasonably estimated. Such revisions could occur at any time there are changes to estimated future revenues or costs. Revenue from certain fixed price engineering contracts for which costs can be reliably estimated are recognized based on milestone billings. Variations in actual labor performance,~~404,000~~ changes to estimated ~~respectively~~profitability and final contract settlements may result in revisions to the cost estimates. Revisions in cost estimates as contracts progress have the effect of increasing or decreasing profits in the period of revision. We record estimated reductions to revenue for volume-based incentives based on expected customer activity for the applicable period. Revisions for volume-based incentives are recorded in the accounting period in which such estimates can be reasonably determined.

~~Redeemable~~ Stock Options — ~~Redeemable~~At ~~ESOP~~October 30, ~~Stock~~2004, the Company has ~~been~~four stock-based compensation plans. The Company ~~excluded~~applies ~~from~~Accounting ~~Shareholder’s~~Principals ~~Equity/~~Board (~~Deficiency~~“APB”) Opinion 25 ~~due~~and torelated Interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its fixed stock option plans. Had compensation cost for the ~~ability~~Company’s offour stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the ~~holders~~fair ofvalue ATat ~~Holdings~~the ~~common~~grant ~~stock~~dates tofor awards ~~“put”,~~under ~~subject~~those toplans ~~certain~~consistent ~~restrictions,~~with the ~~shares~~method toof Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123, the Company.’s ~~The~~net ~~increase~~ income/ (~~decrease~~loss) in for the fiscal years ended ~~Redeemable~~2004, ~~ESOP~~2003 ~~Stock~~and ~~has~~2002 would have been ~~recorded~~adjusted into ~~Accumulated~~the ~~Deficit.~~pro forma amount indicated below (in thousands):

Foreign Currency Translation — Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange, while revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the year. Adjustments from translating foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements are excluded from the consolidated statements of net income and are reported as a component of shareholder’s equity / (deficiency).


	October 30,			October 25,			October 26,
	2004			2003			2002

Net income/(loss) — As reported	$	(461	)	$	4,528		$	5,926
Compensation cost based on the fair value method (after tax)		(76	)		(254	)		(577	)

Net income/(loss) — Pro forma	$	(537	)	$	4,274		$	5,349

Derivative Financial Instruments — All derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swap contracts and foreign exchange contracts, are recognized in the financial statements and measured at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding them. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or shareholders’ equity (as a component of comprehensive income), depending on whether the derivative is being used to hedge changes in fair value or cash flows. At October 25, 2003 the Company did not have any open derivative contracts.

Revenue Recognition — Revenues are generally recognized when goods are shipped or services provided, at which time title and risk of loss passes to the customer. Substantially all sales are made pursuant to firm, fixed-price purchase orders received from customers. We have executed long-term supply agreements with certain of our original equipment manufacturers. These agreements require us to supply all the amounts ordered by the customers during the term (generally three to five years) of the agreements at specified prices. In certain of these agreements, we expect to incur losses. Provisions for estimating loss contracts are made in the period in which such losses are identified, based on cost and pricing information and estimated future shipment quantities provided by the customer. The cumulative effect of revisions to estimated losses on contracts is recorded in the accounting period in which the amounts become known and can be reasonably estimated. Such revisions could occur at any time there are changes to estimated future revenues or costs. Revenue from certain fixed price engineering contracts for which costs can be reliably estimated are recognized based on milestone billings. Variations in actual labor performance, changes to estimated profitability and final contract settlements may result in revisions to the cost estimates. Revisions in cost estimates as contracts progress have the effect of increasing or decreasing profits in the period of revision. We record estimated reductions to revenue for volume-based incentives based on expected customer activity for the applicable period. Revisions for volume-based incentives are recorded in the accounting period in which such estimates can be reasonably determined.

Income Taxes — Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability approach, which can result in recording tax provisions or benefits in periods different than the periods in which such taxes are paid or benefits realized. Expected tax benefits from temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future years and from carryforwards, if it is more likely than not that such tax benefits will be realized, are recognized currently.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-78

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


3.	Other Balance Sheet Information

The major components of the following balance sheet captions were (in thousands):

			October 25,		October 26,
			October 30,		October 25,
			2003		2002
			2004		2003
Accrued liabilities:
	Salaries and accrued compensation		$	69,~~889~~843	$	86,~~086~~889
	Accrued interest			18,~~319~~222		1,~~315~~319
	Accrued warranty			2,~~130~~084		2,~~064~~130
	Accrued income taxes			~~5,787~~810		45,~~833~~787
	Other			67,~~632~~807		46,~~816~~632
		Total	$	2228,~~757~~766	$	2122,~~114~~757
Other noncurrent liabilities:
	Deferred income taxes		$	97,~~821~~747	$	109,~~154~~821
	Accrued post retirement benefits			1011,~~611~~397		910,~~987~~611
	Other			12,~~321~~162		1,~~579~~321
		Total	$	21,~~753~~306	$	21,~~720~~753


4.	Receivables

Receivables consist of the following (in thousands):

			October 25,			October 26,
			October 30,			October 25,
			2003			2002
			2004			2003
Amounts billed — net of allowance for uncollectible amounts of $266 and $310			$	28,572		$	25,000
Amounts billed — net of allowance for uncollectible amounts of $310 and $266			$	29,280		$	28,572
Amounts unbilled (principally commercial customers):
	Net reimbursable costs incurred on uncompleted contracts			13,~~556~~514			~~847~~1,556
	Billings to date			(13,~~793~~781	)		(1,~~297~~793	)
		Total unbilled — net		(~~237~~267	)		(~~450~~237	)
Net receivables			$	2829,~~335~~013		$	2428,~~550~~335


5.	Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

		October 25,			October 26,
		October 30,			October 25,
		2003			2002
		2004			2003
Finished goods		$	12,~~481~~686		$	1,~~861~~481
Work-in-process and purchased parts			1617,~~938~~867			16,~~593~~938
Raw materials and supplies			1211,~~385~~872			11,~~723~~478
	Total		3032,~~804~~425			3029,~~177~~897
Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory			(53,~~103~~868	)		(54,~~054~~196	)
Inventories — net		$	2528,~~701~~557		$	25,~~123~~701

F-89

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


6.	Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of intangible assets, other than goodwill (in thousands):

October 25, 2003

October 26, 2002

October 30, 2004

October 25, 2003

Gross

Accumulated

Gross

Accumulated

Amount

Amortization

Amount

Amortization

Intangible Assets:

Contracts

17,100

1012,~~404~~115

17,100

810,~~693~~404

Spare parts annuity

38,200

1011,~~217~~896

38,200

810,~~537~~217

Patents

387

~~150~~174

387

~~126~~150

Total

55,687

2024,~~771~~185

55,687

1720,~~356~~771

Amortization expense recorded on the intangible assets for each of the fiscal years ended October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003 and October 26, 2002 was $3.4 million. The estimated amortization expense for each of the ~~three~~two succeeding fiscal years ~~2004~~2005 ~~through~~and 2006 is $3.4 million, fiscal year 2007 is $3.2 3 million and fiscal ~~year~~years 2008 isand 2009 are each $1.7 million. The weighted-average amortization period for contracts is 10 years, spare parts annuity is 26 years and patents is 15 years. The intangible asset “Spare Parts Annuity” is the result of customer relationships that have been developed by supplying spare parts to our aftermarket customers.


7.	Goodwill

Argo-Tech adopted ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“~~SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” as of October 28, 2001. Under this statement, goodwill and other intangibles determined to have an ~~indefinite~~infinite life are no longer amortized; however, these assets are to be reviewed for impairment on a periodic basis. Argo-Tech completed its transitional impairment test for goodwill during the second fiscal quarter of 2002 using a present value of future cash flows valuation method. This process did not result in any impairment being recorded upon the adoption of ~~SFAS~~ SFAS No. 142. Goodwill is subject to an impairment test at least annually thereafter. All of the Company’s goodwill is allocated to its Aerospace segment.

~~Upon adoption of SFAS No~~8. ~~142, $2.4 million~~ ~~related~~Property to the unamortized portion of the intangible asset, workforce in place, was reclassified from intangible assets to goodwill along with the related long-term deferred tax liability of $1.0 million. The following pro forma information shows what income would have been had SFAS No. 142 been in effect as of October 29, 2000 for the fiscal years ended 2003, 2002 and ~~2001 (in thousands):~~ Equipment

		2003		2002		2001
Net income as reported		$	4,528	$	5,926	$	10,800
Add amortization expense:
	Goodwill						3,489
	Workforce in place, net of tax of $245						367
Adjusted net income		$	4,528	$	5,926	$	14,656

Owned Property — Property and equipment owned by the Company consists of the following (in thousands):

F-9


		October 30,			October 25,
		2004			2003

Land and land improvements		$	7,663		$	7,663
Buildings and building equipment			34,548			34,448
Machinery and equipment			41,694			40,360
Office and automotive equipment			8,504			8,128
Construction-in-progress			1,325			333

	Total		93,734			90,932
Accumulated depreciation			(70,521	)		(66,976	)

Total — net		$	23,213		$	23,956

Property Leased to Others — The Company leases certain portions of its facility in Euclid, Ohio. The leases have been accounted for as operating leases whereby revenue is recognized as earned over the lease terms. The

F-10

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

8 cost of property leased to others is included in property and equipment and is being depreciated over its estimated useful life. ~~Property~~It is not practical to determine the cost of the property that is being leased to others or the related amount of accumulated depreciation. In addition, the Company has separate service contracts with its tenants under which the Company provides maintenance, telecommunications and ~~Equipment~~various other services.

~~Owned~~Total ~~Property — Property~~rental revenue under the property leases and ~~equipment~~service ~~owned~~contracts byis included in “Net revenues” ~~the~~and ~~Company~~was ~~consists~~as offollows for the ~~following~~fiscal years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

		October 25,			October 26,
		2004			2003			2002
		2003			2002
Minimum contractual amounts under property leases		$	4,126		$	4,498		$	4,526
Land and land improvements		$	7,663		$	7,663
Service contracts revenue based on usage			828			774			792
Buildings and building equipment			34,448			34,199
	Total	$	4,954		$	5,272		$	5,318
Machinery and equipment			40,360			39,045
Office and automotive equipment			8,128			7,409
Construction-in-progress			333			979
	Total		90,932			89,295
Accumulated depreciation			(66,976	)		(63,091	)
Total — net		$	23,956		$	26,204

~~Property~~Future ~~Leased~~minimum torentals ~~Others — The~~under ~~Company leases certain portions of its facility in Euclid, Ohio. The leases have been accounted for as operating leases whereby revenue is recognized as earned over~~ the ~~lease terms. The cost of property leased to~~noncancelable ~~others is included in~~ property ~~and~~leases ~~equipment~~ and isservice ~~being depreciated~~contracts ~~over~~at ~~its~~October 30, ~~estimated useful life. It is not practical~~2004 toare ~~determine~~(in ~~the~~thousands): ~~cost~~$3,354 ofin ~~the~~2005, ~~property~~$1,336 ~~that~~in is2006, ~~being~~$821 ~~leased to~~in ~~others or the related amount of accumulated depreciation. In addition~~2007, ~~the~~$646 ~~Company~~in ~~has separate service contracts with its tenants under which the Company provides maintenance~~2008, ~~telecommunications~~ and ~~various~~$0 ~~other~~in ~~services~~2009.

Total rental revenue under the property leases and service contracts is included in “Net revenues” and was as follows for the fiscal years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):

		2003		2002		2001
Minimum contractual amounts under property leases		$	4,498	$	4,526	$	4,368
Service contracts revenue based on usage			774		792		862
	Total	$	5,272	$	5,318	$	5,230

Future minimum rentals under the noncancelable property leases and service contracts at October 25, 2003 are (in thousands): $3,285 in 2004, $956 in 2005, $280 in 2006, $6 in 2007, and $0 in 2008.


9.	Product Warranty

~~Argo-Tech~~The ~~Corporation~~Company ~~adopted~~accrues ~~Financial~~for warranty obligations for ~~Accounting~~products ~~Standards~~sold ~~Board~~based ~~(“FASB”)~~on ~~Interpretation~~management estimates of the amount that ~~No. 45~~may ~~(“FIN~~be ~~45”),~~required ~~“Guarantor’s~~to settle such potential obligations. These ~~Accounting~~estimates ~~and~~are ~~Disclosure~~prepared ~~Requirements~~with ~~for~~support ~~Guarantees~~from our sales, ~~Including~~engineering, ~~Indirect~~quality ~~Guarantees~~and oflegal ~~Indebtedness~~functions. ofThis ~~Others~~accrual,” ~~effective~~which is reviewed in asdetail ofon ~~its~~a ~~first~~regular ~~quarter~~basis, ofis ~~fiscal~~based ~~2003.~~on ~~FIN~~several 45factors: ~~requires~~past ~~disclosures~~experience, tocurrent beclaims, ~~made~~production bychanges aand ~~guarantor~~various ~~about~~other considerations. ~~its~~The ~~obligations~~following table presents a reconciliation of ~~under~~changes ~~certain~~in ~~guarantees~~the ~~that~~product itwarranty ~~has~~liability ~~issued.~~(in thousands):

Argo-Tech accrues for warranty obligations for products sold based on management estimates of the amount that may be required to settle such potential obligations. These estimates are prepared with support from our sales, engineering, quality and legal functions. This accrual, which is reviewed in detail on a regular basis, is


	October 30,			October 25,
	2004			2003

Beginning balance	$	2,130		$	2,064
Accruals for warranties issued		20			325
Accruals for pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimate)		780			448
Warranty claims settled		(846	)		(707	)

Ending balance	$	2,084		$	2,130

F-10 . Employee Benefit Plans

Employee Stock Ownership Plan — The Company has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) to provide retirement benefits to qualifying, salaried employees. The ESOP grants to participants in the plan certain ownership rights in, but not possession of, the common stock of AT Holdings Corporation held by the Trustee of the Plan. Shares of common stock are allocated annually to participants in the ESOP pursuant to a prescribed formula. The value of the shares committed to be released by the Trustee under the Plan’s provisions for allocation to participants was recognized as an expense of $4,851,000, $1,874,000 and $1,344,000 for the fiscal years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The cost of the shares acquired for the ESOP that are not committed to be released to participants is shown as a contra-account, “Unearned ESOP shares”. In October 2004, the Company contributed 21,000 shares of AT Holdings common stock to the plan. These shares were repurchased by Argo-Tech from plan participants who exercised their put option rights under the plan. These rights are described below.

F-11

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

based on several factors: past experience, current claims, production changes and various other considerations. The following table presents a reconciliation of changes in the product warranty liability (in thousands):

	October 25,			October 26,
	2003			2002
Beginning balance	$	2,064		$	2,100
Accruals for warranties issued		325			80
Accruals for pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimate)		448			620
Warranty claims settled		(707	)		(736	)
Ending balance	$	2,130		$	2,064

10. Employee Benefit Plans

Employee Stock Ownership Plan — The Company has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) to provide retirement benefits to qualifying, salaried employees. The ESOP grants to participants in the plan certain ownership rights in, but not possession of, the common stock of AT Holdings Corporation held by the Trustee of the Plan. Shares of common stock are allocated annually to participants in the ESOP pursuant to a prescribed formula. The value of the shares committed to be released by the Trustee under the Plan’s provisions for allocation to participants was recognized as an expense of $1,874,000, $1,344,000 and $2,091,000 for the fiscal years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The cost of the shares acquired for the ESOP that are not committed to be released to participants is shown as a contra-account, “Unearned ESOP shares”.

Summary information regarding ESOP activity consists of the following:

	October 25,			October 26,
	October 30,			October 25,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Allocated shares		~~357~~399,000			~~315~~357,000
Shares released for allocation		42,000			42,000
Shares released for allocation(a)		42,000			42,000
Unearned ESOP shares		~~21,000~~—			6321,000
Total ESOP shares		~~420~~441,000			420,000
Repurchased shares received as distributions		(7386,~~692~~366	)		(6573,~~151~~692	)
Total available ESOP shares		~~346~~354,~~308~~634			~~354~~346,~~849~~308
Fair market value of unearned ESOP shares	$	~~937,020~~—		$	2937,~~016,000~~020


(a) -	Includes contributed shares.

All of the shares acquired for the ESOP (both allocated and unearned shares) are owned and held in trust by the ESOP.

The stock of AT Holdings Corporation is not listed or traded on an active stock market and market prices are, therefore, not available. Annually, an independent financial consulting firm determines the fair market value based upon the Company’s performance and financial condition.

The Company provides an “internal market” for ~~shareholders~~stockholders through its purchase of their shares of common ~~shares~~stock. Participants in the Company’s ESOP who have left the Company or are employees eligible for stock diversification have the right to require the Company, within a specified period, to repurchase shares of stock received as distributions under the ESOP at fair market value. For each year ~~their~~presented, the total available ESOP shares are multiplied by the fair market value of the common stock and shown as “Redeemable ESOP Stock” on the Balance Sheet.

~~Pension~~The ~~and~~Company ~~Savings~~maintains ~~Plans —~~a supplemental employee ~~The~~retirement ~~Company~~plan, ~~has~~an ~~two~~unfunded plan that at all times will be ~~noncontributory~~deemed ~~defined~~invested ~~benefit~~in ~~pension~~AT ~~plans~~Holdings common stock. This plan is for employees ~~qualifying~~participating in the ESOP in respect of reduction to ~~hourly~~allocations ~~and~~to ~~salary~~their ~~employees~~accounts because of limitations under the tax code applicable to tax-qualified plans. ABenefits under this plan ~~covering~~vest ~~salaried~~in ~~employees provides~~the ~~pension~~same manner as benefits ~~that~~under ~~are~~the ~~based~~ESOP onand distributions from the ~~employees’~~plan will, subject to certain ~~compensation~~restrictions, ~~and~~be ~~years~~made ofin ~~service.~~whole ~~The~~or ~~future~~fractional ~~accrual~~shares of AT Holdings common stock at the same time or times as benefits under ~~was~~the ~~terminated~~ESOP inare ~~connection~~distributable, ~~with~~or in the ~~formation~~case of benefits with respect to qualifying employer securities subject to the put option under the ESOP., Aat the time the plan ~~covering~~participant exercises ~~hourly~~(or ~~employees~~is ~~provides~~deemed ~~benefits~~to ofhave exercised) a hypothetical ~~stated~~“put option” under the plan.

F Pension and Savings Plans — The Company has two noncontributory defined benefit pension plans for qualifying hourly and salary employees. A plan covering salaried employees provides pension benefits that are based on the employees’ compensation and years of service. The future accrual of benefits was terminated in connection with the formation of the ESOP. A plan covering hourly employees provides benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute actuarially determined amounts allowable under Internal Revenue Service regulations. The Company also sponsors three employee savings plans, which cover substantially all of the Company’s employees. The plan covering Argo-11Tech Corporation Costa Mesa employees provides for a match of participating employees’ contributions. The Company’s contribution, recognized as expense was approximately $560,000, $488,000 and $408,000 in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively.

The Company uses an October 31st measurement date for its defined benefit pension plans.

F-12

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~amounts~~A ~~for~~summary ~~each year~~ of ~~service.~~the ~~The Company’s~~components ~~funding~~of ~~policy~~net ~~is to contribute actuarially~~periodic ~~determined~~pension ~~amounts~~cost ~~allowable~~for ~~under~~the ~~Internal~~pension ~~Revenue Service regulations. The Company also sponsors three employee savings~~ plans, ~~which~~for ~~cover substantially all of~~ the ~~Company’s employees.~~fiscal ~~The~~years ~~plan covering Argo-Tech Corporation Costa Mesa~~ended ~~employees~~2004, ~~provides~~2003 ~~for~~and a2002 ~~match~~is ~~of participating employees’ contributions. The Company’s contribution, recognized~~ as ~~expense~~ ~~was~~follows ~~approximately $488,000, $408,000 and $373,000~~ (in ~~fiscal~~ ~~years 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectively.~~thousands):

A summary of the components of net periodic pension cost for the pension plans for the fiscal years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001 is as follows (in thousands):


	2004			2003			2002

Service cost — benefits earned during the period	$	279		$	277		$	255
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		1,324			1,299			1,279
Expected return on plan assets		(1,756	)		(1,491	)		(1,628	)
Net amortization and deferral		348			384			218

Net periodic pension cost		195			469			124

Settlement (gain)/loss								(184	)
Special termination benefits								770

Net periodic pension cost after settlements	$	195		$	469		$	710

	2003			2002			2001
Service cost — benefits earned during the period	$	277		$	255		$	196
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		1,299			1,279			1,191
Expected return on plan assets		(1,491	)		(1,628	)		(1,666	)
Net amortization and deferral		384			218			(99	)
Net periodic pension cost/(benefit)		469			124			(378	)
Settlement (gain)/loss					(184	)
Special termination benefits					770
Net periodic pension cost/(benefit) after settlements	$	469		$	710		$	(378	)

The following table sets forth the change in projected benefit obligation (in thousands):

		October 25,			October 26,
		October 30,			October 25,
		2003			2002
		2004			2003
Benefit obligation at beginning of year		$	1920,~~180~~809		$	1719,~~875~~180
	Service cost		~~277~~279			~~255~~277
	Interest cost		1,~~299~~324			1,~~279~~299
	Benefits paid		(~~914~~923	)		(~~918~~914	)
	Actuarial (gain) loss		(127	)		(547	)
	Actuarial (gain)/loss		16			(127	)
	Change due to amendments		—			401
	Change due to assumptions		58			(201	)
	Change due to assumptions		(201	)		—
	Change in discount rate		1,414			1,295
	Curtailments		—			118
	Benefit obligation at end of year	$	22,977		$	20,809
	Settlements		—			(1,222	)
	Special termination benefits		—			770
	Change in discount rate		1,295			1,169
	Benefit obligation at end of year	$	20,809		$	19,180

~~F-12~~ The following table sets forth the change in plan assets (in thousands):


	October 30,			October 25,
	2004			2003

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	19,974		$	16,684
Actual return on plan assets		1,876			2,914
Employer contributions		185			1,290
Benefits paid		(923	)		(914	)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	21,112		$	19,974

The following table sets forth the funded status of the plans (in thousands):


	October 30,			October 25,
	2004			2003

Funded status	$	(1,865	)	$	(834	)
Unrecognized net loss		5,512			4,410
Unrecognized prior service cost		380			461

Net amount recognized	$	4,027		$	4,037

F-13

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table ~~sets~~shows ~~forth~~the development of the prepaid ~~change~~pension incost ~~plan~~prior to reflection of additional minimum ~~assets~~liability (in thousands):

	October 25,			October 26,
	October 30,			October 25,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	16,684		$	18,789
Prepaid pension cost at the beginning of the year	$	4,037		$	3,216
Actual return on plan assets		2,914			(965	)
Net periodic pension cost		(195	)		(469	)
Employer contributions		~~1,290~~185			1,~~000~~290
Benefits paid		(914	)		(918	)
Prepaid pension cost at the end of the year	$	4,027		$	4,037
Settlements		—			(1,222	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	19,974		$	16,684

~~The~~Amounts ~~following~~recognized ~~table~~in ~~sets forth~~ the ~~funded~~consolidated ~~status~~balance ofsheets ~~the~~consist ~~plans~~of (in thousands):

	October 25,			October 26,
	October 30,			October 25,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Funded status	$	(835	)	$	(2,496	)
Prepaid benefit cost	$	—		$	972
Unrecognized net loss		4,410			5,169
Accrued benefit liability		(1,865	)		(943	)
Unrecognized prior service cost		463			543
Intangible asset		380			461
Prepaid benefit cost	$	4,038		$	3,216
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		5,512			3,547
Net amount recognized	$	4,027		$	4,037

Amounts recognized in the statements of financial position consist of (in thousands):

	October 25,			October 26,
	2003			2002
Prepaid benefit cost	$	972		$	—
Accrued benefit liability		(943	)		(2,496	)
Intangible asset		462			543
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		3,547			5,169
Net amount recognized	$	4,038		$	3,216

The foregoing net amounts regarding the pension benefit obligation and the value of plan assets for the year ended October 25, 2003 are based on a combination of both overfunded and underfunded plans. The aggregate amounts relating to the underfunded plan are as follows (in thousands):


	October 25,
	2003

Projected benefit obligation	$	9,792
Fair value of plan assets		8,849

The ~~assumptions~~following ~~used~~table tosets ~~determine~~forth ~~net periodic~~additional ~~pension~~information ~~cost~~of ~~as well as~~ the ~~funded~~plans ~~status~~(in ~~are~~thousands):

	2003			2002			2001
	October 30,			October 25,
Discount rate		6.50	%		7.00	%		7.50	%
	2004			2003
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets		9.00	%		9.00	%		9.00	%
Accumulated benefit obligation at the end of the year	$	22,977		$	20,809
Increase (decrease) in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income		1,966			(1,622	)

AThe ~~decrease~~weighted inaverage ~~the~~assumptions ~~discount~~used ~~rate of 0.25%,~~ to ~~6.25%,~~determine ~~would~~net ~~result~~periodic inpension acost ~~$0.6~~as ~~million~~well ~~increase~~as in the ~~benefit obligation~~funded ~~at October 25, 2003. This increase in the~~status ~~benefit obligation would cause both of the plans for the fiscal~~are: ~~year ended October 25, 2003 to be underfunded, with the~~ ~~recognition of an additional accrued benefit liability and~~ ~~charge to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, of $0.9 million.~~

F-13


	2004			2003			2002

Discount rate		6.00	%		6.50	%		7.00	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets		9.00	%		9.00	%		9.00	%

F-14

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table sets forth the weighted-average asset allocations, by asset category:



			Assets at

	Target		October 30,			October 25,
Asset Category	Allocation		2004			2003

Equity securities		60% - 70%		61.2	%		65.6	%
Debt securities		30% - 40%		38.3	%		31.9	%
Cash		0% - 10%		0.5	%		2.5	%

Total				100.0	%		100.0	%

The expected long-term rate of return for the plans’ assets is based on the expected return of each of the above categories, weighted based on the median of the target allocation for each class. Based on respective market indices, equity securities are expected to return 8% to 10% over the long-term, while cash and fixed income is expected to return between 4% and 6%. The committee expects that the plans’ asset manager will provide a modest (1% to 2% per annum) premium to the respective market benchmark indices.

The plans’ investment policy is to provide a long-term investment return greater than the actuarial assumptions, maximize investment return commensurate with appropriate levels of risk and comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) by investing the funds in a manner consistent with ERISA’s fiduciary standards.

The company expects to contribute $352,000 to the plans for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2005.

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid for the fiscal years ending (in thousands):


October 31, 2005	$	1,051
October 31, 2006		1,050
October 31, 2007		1,055
October 31, 2008		1,065
October 31, 2009		1,112
October 31, 2010 to October 31, 2014		7,137

Other Postretirement Benefits — The Company provides certain postretirement health care benefits to qualifying hourly retirees and their dependents.

The ~~net~~Company ~~postretirement~~uses ~~benefit~~an October 31st measurement ~~cost~~date for ~~the fiscal~~its ~~years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001 includes the following~~postretirement ~~components~~health ~~(in~~care ~~thousands):~~benefit.

	2003		2002			2001
Service cost	$	187	$	136		$	124
Interest cost		804		650			634
Net amortization and deferral		23		(7	)		(32	)
Net postretirement benefit cost	$	1,014	$	779		$	726

The net postretirement benefit cost for the fiscal years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002 includes the following components (in thousands):


	2004		2003		2002

Service cost	$	179	$	187	$	136
Interest cost		881		804		650
Net amortization and deferral		135		23		(7	)

Net postretirement benefit cost	$	1,195	$	1,014	$	779

F-15

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table sets forth the change in projected benefit obligation (in thousands):

	October 25,			October 26,
	October 30,			October 25,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	914,~~954~~519		$	9,~~167~~954
Service cost		~~187~~179			~~136~~187
Interest cost		~~804~~881			~~650~~804
Benefits paid		(~~340~~492	)		(~~335~~458	)
Actuarial (gain) loss		1,662			(330	)
Plan participant contributions		133			118
Change in discount rate/other assumptions		2,252			666
Actuarial (gain)/loss		(1,315	)		1,662
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	14,519		$	9,954
Change in plan provisions		(472	)		—
Change in discount rate		1,043			2,252
Benefit obligation at end of year	$	14,476		$	14,519

The actuarial (gain)/loss includes an actuarial gain of $1,824 due to the Medicare Rx subsidy.

The following table sets forth the change in plan assets (in thousands):


	October 30,			October 25,
	2004			2003

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	—		$	—
Benefits paid		(492	)		(458	)
Employer contributions		359			340
Plan participant contributions		133			118

Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	—		$	—

The following table sets forth the funded status of the plans (in thousands):

	October 25,			October 26,
	October 30,			October 25,
	2003			2002
	2004			2003
Benefit obligation	$	(14,~~519~~476	)	$	(914,~~954~~519	)
Unrecognized net (gain) loss		3,558			(333	)
Unrecognized prior service cost		(472	)		—
Accrued benefit cost	$	(10,961	)	$	(10,287	)
Unrecognized net (gain) loss		3,151			3,558
Accrued benefit cost	$	(11,797	)	$	(10,961	)

~~Benefit~~The ~~costs~~following ~~were~~table ~~generally~~shows estimated assuming retiree health care costs would initially increase at an 11% annual rate, decreasing gradually to a 5% annual growth rate after 12 years and remain at a 5% annual growth rate thereafter. For the ~~plan~~development ~~year~~of ~~beginning November 1, 2003,~~ the ~~annual~~accrued increase in retiree health care costs was adjusted from 7.00% to a 9.00% annual rate, decreasing gradually to a 5% annual growth rate after seven years and remain at a 5% annual growth rate thereafter. A 1% increase in this annual trend rate would have increased the accumulated postretirement benefit ~~obligation~~ atcost ~~October 25,~~(in 2003 by $2.5 million with a corresponding effect on the 2003 postretirement benefit expense of $0.2 million. The discount rate used to estimate the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 6.50% and 7.00% for fiscal years 2003 and 2002, respectively. thousands):

F-14


	October 30,			October 25,
	2004			2003

Accrued postretirement benefit cost at the beginning of the year	$	(10,961	)	$	(10,287	)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost		(1,195	)		(1,014	)
Claim payments		359			340

Accrued postretirement benefit cost at the end of the year	$	(11,797	)	$	(10,961	)

F-16

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The weighted-average assumption used to determine net periodic postretirement benefit cost and benefit obligations is:

The assumed health care cost trend rates are as follows:


	2004			2003

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year		8.00	%		8.50	%
Ultimate rate		5.00	%		5.00	%
Year ultimate rate is valued		2011			2011

The company expects the following contributions to be made to the plan for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2005 (in thousands):


Expected employer contributions	$	510
Expected plan participant contributions	$	170

The following benefit payments (employer portion only), which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid for the fiscal years ending (in thousands):


October 31, 2005	$	510
October 31, 2006		519
October 31, 2007		577
October 31, 2008		638
October 31, 2009		701
October 31, 2010 to October 31, 2014		4,057

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects (in thousands):


	1% point		1% point
	Increase		Decrease

Effect on service and interest cost	$	182	$	(147	)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation	$	2,437	$	(1,998	)


11.	Income Taxes

The income tax provision/(benefit) consists of ~~the~~ the following for the fiscal years ended ~~2003~~2004, ~~2002~~2003 and ~~2001~~2002 (in thousands):

			2003			2002			2001
			2004			2003			2002
Current tax provision:
Current tax provision/(benefit):
	Federal		$	(1,~~485~~273	)	$	12,~~647~~134		$	~~4,143~~797
	State and local			~~672~~(76	)		~~580~~672			~~695~~580
		Total		2(1,~~157~~349	)		2,~~227~~806			41,~~838~~377
Deferred tax benefit				(~~578~~2,150	)		(1,~~658~~227	)		(~~1,962~~808	)
Income tax provision			$	1,579		$	569		$	2,876
Income tax provision/(benefit)			$	(3,499	)	$	1,579		$	569

F-17 ~~The difference between the recorded income tax~~ ~~provision and the amounts computed using the statutory U.S.~~ ~~Federal income tax rates are as follows (in thousands):~~

	2003			2002			2001
Income tax provision at statutory rate	$	2,137		$	2,273		$	4,787
State tax provision — net of federal benefits		391			366			451
Extraterritorial income		(829	)		(996	)		(1,458	)
R & D credit		(252	)		(584	)		(2,714	)
Goodwill								1,195
ESOP		66			(114	)		291
Other — net		66			(376	)		324
Income tax provision	$	1,579		$	569		$	2,876

During the fiscal years ended 2003 and 2001, the Company paid (net of refunds received) approximately $1.7 million and $6.6 million in income taxes, respectively. In fiscal year 2002 the Company received a net refund of income taxes of approximately $0.8 million.

F-15

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The ~~components~~difference ofbetween the ~~Company’s~~recorded ~~net~~income ~~deferred~~ tax ~~asset~~ provision/(~~liability~~benefit) and the amounts computed using the statutory U.S. Federal income tax rates are as follows (in thousands):

			October 25,				October 26,
		2004				2003				2002
			2003				2002
Income tax provision at statutory rate		$	(1,346	)		$	2,137			$	2,273
Current:
State tax provision — net of federal benefits			80				391				366
	Inventory		$	1,273			$	1,312
Extraterritorial income			(1,403	)			(829	)			(996	)
	Employee benefits			1,288				1,273
R & D credit			(590	)			(252	)			(584	)
	Warranty			844				851
ESOP			539				66				(114	)
	Engineering reserves			599				516
Settlement of tax examination and reserve adjustment			(720	)
	Other reserves			707				514
Other — net			(59	)			66				(376	)
Total current				4,711				4,466
Income tax provision/(benefit)		$	(3,499	)		$	1,579			$	569
Long-term:
	Hourly retiree medical			4,259				4,254
	Prepaid pension benefit			(323	)			531
	Property and equipment			835				1,137
	Intangible assets			(14,324	)			(15,719	)
	Other — net			(268	)			(357	)
Total long-term				(9,821	)			(10,154	)
Net deferred tax liability			$	(5,110	)		$	(5,688	)

~~The~~During ~~temporary difference described above principally represent differences between~~ the ~~tax~~fiscal ~~bases~~years ~~of assets~~ended ~~(principally~~2004 ~~inventory, property~~ and ~~equipment~~2003, ~~and~~the ~~intangible~~Company ~~assets)~~paid ~~or liabilities~~ (~~principally~~net ~~related~~of ~~to employee~~refunds ~~benefits and loss reserves~~received) ~~and~~approximately ~~their~~$1.3 ~~reported amounts~~and $1.7 million in ~~the~~income ~~consolidated~~taxes ~~financial~~respectively. ~~statements~~In ~~that~~fiscal ~~will result in~~year ~~taxable~~2002 orthe ~~deductible~~Company ~~amounts~~received ina ~~future~~net ~~years~~refund ~~when the reported amounts~~ of ~~the~~income ~~assets~~taxes ~~or liabilities are recovered or settled,~~of ~~respectively~~approximately $0.8.

The components of the Company’s net deferred tax asset/(liability) are as follows (in thousands):


		October 30,			October 25,
		2004			2003

Current:
	Inventory	$	1,374		$	1,273
	Employee benefits		1,361			1,288
	Warranty		815			844
	Engineering reserves		1,329			599
	Other reserves		694			707

Total current			5,573			4,711

Long-term:
	Hourly retiree medical		4,420			4,259
	Accrued/(Prepaid) pension benefit		846			(323	)
	Employee benefits		500
	Property and equipment		(584	)		835
	Intangible assets		(12,866	)		(14,324	)
	Other — net		(63	)		(268	)

Total long-term			(7,747	)		(9,821	)

Net deferred tax liability		$	(2,174	)	$	(5,110	)

The temporary difference described above principally represent differences between the tax bases of assets (principally inventory, property and equipment, and intangible assets) or liabilities (principally related to employee benefits and loss reserves) and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of the assets or liabilities are recovered or settled, respectively. The current deferred tax asset is reflected in “Deferred income taxes and prepaid expenses” and the total long-term deferred tax liability is reflected in “Other Noncurrent Liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets.

F-18

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


12.	Debt

Summary — The Company’s long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

		October 25,			October 26,
		October 30,			October 25,
		2003			2002
		2004			2003
Term Loans		$	25,850		$	41,850
Term loans		$	14,813		$	25,850
Revolving Credit Facility
Revolving credit facility
Senior Subordinated Notes			193,499			193,195
Senior notes			250,000
	Total borrowings		219,349			235,045
Senior subordinated notes						193,499
Current maturities			(12,000	)		(16,000	)
	Total borrowings		264,813			219,349
Long-term portion		$	207,349		$	219,045
Current maturities			(750	)		(12,000	)
Long-term portion		$	264,063		$	207,349

Credit Facility and Term Loans — The Company has ~~available~~a $~~115~~15.0 million ~~principal~~five-year ~~amount of~~ Term ~~Loans,~~Loan Facility and ahas ~~seven~~available a five-year $2030.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The unused balance of the Revolving Credit Facility ($1724.82 million at October 2530, ~~2003~~2004 after reduction of $25.28 million for letters of credit) is subject to a .7550% commitment fee. The Credit Facility and Term Loan mature on June 23, 2009. The Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of the tangible assets of the Company (including the capital stock of AT Holdings) as well as the unearned shares of the AT Holding’s common stock held by the ESOP. The Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, prepay subordinated indebtedness, dispose of certain assets, create liens, make capital expenditures, make certain investments or acquisitions and otherwise restrict corporate activities. The Credit Facility contains no restrictions on the ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to make distributions to the Company. The Credit Facility also requires the Company to comply with certain financial ratios and tests, under which the Company is required to achieve certain financial and operating results. The Company was in compliance with the covenants at October 30, 2004. Interest was calculated, at the Company’s choice, using an alternate base rate (ABR) or LIBOR, plus a supplemental percentage determined by the ratio of debt to adjusted EBITDA. The interest rate for fiscal year 2004 ranged from 1.00% to 2.50% plus ABR or 2.50% to 3.50% plus LIBOR.

F At October 25, 2003 the Company had a $115.0 million principal amount of Term Loans ($25.9 million remaining balance) and a seven-16year $20.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. The Credit Facility and Term Loans were to mature on October 28, 2005. On June 23, 2004, the Company amended and restated the Credit Facility and Term Loans into a $15.0 million five-year Term Loan Facility and a five-year $30.0 million Revolving Credit Facility.

Senior Notes — At October 30, 2004, the Company had outstanding $250.0 million 9 1/4% Senior Notes due 2011. Interest on the Notes is payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year. The Senior Notes will mature on June 1, 2011.

The Senior Notes are unsecured and rank equally with all our existing and future senior debt and rank senior to all our existing and future subordinated debt. The Senior Notes will be effectively subordinated to all our existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of the assets securing such debt. The Senior Notes are subject to certain limitations and restrictions which the Company has not exceeded at October 30, 2004.

Senior Subordinated Notes — At October 25, 2003, the Company had outstanding $195.0 million 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 (the “Notes”). The accreted value of the Notes was $193.5 million. Interest on the Notes was payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of each year. In June 2004, the

F-19

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~dispose~~Company ~~of certain assets~~purchased, ~~create~~through ~~liens,~~a ~~make capital~~tender ~~expenditures,~~offer ~~make certain investments or acquisitions~~ and ~~otherwise restrict corporate activities. The Credit Facility~~ ~~also requires the Company to comply with certain financial ratios and tests~~redemption, ~~under~~its ~~which~~outstanding ~~the Company is required to achieve certain financial and operating results~~$195. ~~On January~~0 ~~24, 2003~~million ~~the Company amended and restated its Credit Facility to~~8 allow for the re-amortization of the outstanding balance of the Term Loans, amending the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio for the remainder of the agreement, adjusting the supplemental percentage of interest applied to an Alternate Base Rate (ABR)5/8% orNotes ~~LIBOR,~~due ~~changing the commitment fee rate~~2007, ~~increasing~~ ~~the~~together ~~Letter~~with ~~of Credit sublimit in the revolving credit facility to an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 and establishing~~ a ~~borrowing~~premium ~~base covenant on revolving credit borrowings in excess~~ of $105.06 million and aaccrued ~~fixed~~and ~~charge~~unpaid ~~coverage~~interest ~~ratio. The maturities~~ of ~~the Company’s Term Loans are now as~~ ~~follows:~~ $164.0 million~~, $12~~.~~0 million and $13.8~~ ~~million for fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. The~~ ~~Company was in compliance with the covenants at October 25,~~ 2003. Interest was calculated, at the Company’s choice, using an alternate base rate (ABR) or LIBOR, plus a supplemental percentage determined by the ratio of debt to EBITDA. The interest rate for fiscal year 2003 ranged from 1.75% to 2.50% plus ABR or 2.75% to 3.50% plus LIBOR.

~~Senior~~Annual ~~Subordinated~~Maturities ~~Notes — The~~and ~~Company has outstanding~~Interest ~~$195.0~~Payments ~~million~~— ~~8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due~~The ~~2007~~maturities ~~(the “Notes”). At October 25, 2003, the accreted value~~ of the ~~Notes~~Company’s ~~was~~long-term ~~$193.5 million.~~debt ~~Interest~~(excluding on the ~~Notes is payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of~~ ~~each~~senior ~~year.~~notes ~~The~~which ~~Notes will~~ mature ~~on October 1, 2007. After October 1, 2002, the Company may redeem the Notes,~~ in ~~whole or~~2011) induring ~~part,~~each atof the ~~redemption~~next ~~prices at the time, together with~~five ~~accrued~~fiscal ~~and~~years ~~unpaid~~are ~~interest,~~as iffollows ~~any,~~(in ~~to the date of redemption.~~thousands):

The Notes are unsecured and are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future Senior Indebtedness of the Company and are subject to certain limitations and restrictions which the Company has not exceeded at October 25, 2003.


Fiscal Year	Amount

2005	$	750
2006		750
2007		750
2008		3,563
2009		9,000

Total	$	14,813

~~Annual~~Total ~~Maturities~~interest ~~and~~paid ~~Interest Payments —~~during ~~The maturities of~~ the ~~Company’s~~fiscal ~~long-term~~years ~~debt during each of~~ended ~~the~~2004, ~~next~~2003 ~~five~~and ~~fiscal~~2002 ~~years~~was ~~are~~$20.7 million, as$18.5 million and ~~follows~~$19.0 million, ~~(in thousands):~~respectively.

Fiscal Year	Amount
2004	$	12,000
2005		13,850
2006
2007		193,499
2008
Total	$	219,349

Debt Extinguishment Expense — The Company incurred $12.9 million of debt extinguishment expense in fiscal 2004. The expense is for the write-off of $6.1 million of deferred financing fees associated with the refinancing of our 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes and the amendment and restatement of our credit agreement, $5.5 million for the tender, consent and redemption fees associated with the refinancing of the 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes and recognition of the remaining accretion of $1.3 million on a portion of the 8 5/8% senior subordinated notes that were issued at a discount.

Total interest paid during the fiscal years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $18.5 million, $19.0 million and $22.1 million, respectively.


13.	Segment Information

The Company operates in two business segments, Aerospace and Industrial. The Aerospace segment includes the design, manufacture, distribution, repair and overhaul of aviation products ~~throughout the world~~ consisting of aircraft engine fuel pumps, fuel flow related products and systems found on a plane’s airframe, and aerial refueling pumps and related equipment. The Industrial segment includes the design, manufacture and distribution of industrial pumps, ground fueling valves and related components, industrial marine cryogenic pumps and nozzles for transferring liquefied natural gas and operation of a business park in Cleveland, Ohio where the Company maintains ~~its~~ its headquarters and one of its production facilities.

~~F-17~~ The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based primarily on operating profit before amortization of deferred financing fees and other identified intangibles, interest expense, interest income, other miscellaneous fees and income taxes.

F-20

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based primarily on operating profit before amortization of deferred financing fees and other identified intangibles, interest expense, interest income, other miscellaneous fees and income taxes.

The following table presents revenues and other financial information by business segment (in thousands):

2004


	Aerospace		Industrial		Corporate			Consolidated

Customer revenues	$	138,177	$	49,151	$	—		$	187,328
Operating profit (loss)		34,584		761		(320	)		35,025
Amortization of intangible assets									3,414

Income from operations									31,611
Interest expense									22,705
Debt extinguishment expense									12,961
Other, net									(95	)

Loss before tax								$	(3,960	)

Capital expenditures		1,789		1,267					3,056
Depreciation		2,168		1,231		400			3,799
Compensation expense recognized in connection with employee stock ownership plan		4,270		581					4,851

2003

	Aerospace		Industrial		Corporate			Consolidated
Customer revenues	$	121,278	$	39,448	$	—		$	160,726
Intersegment revenues		—		—		—			—
Eliminations									—
Operating profit (loss)		28,484		2,157		(392	)		30,249
Amortization of intangible assets									3,414
Income from operations									26,835
Interest expense									21,257
Other, net									(529	)
Income before tax								$	6,107
Capital expenditures		~~933~~1,194		~~1,006~~745					1,939
Depreciation		2,503		1,280		404			4,187
Compensation expense recognized in connection with employee stock ownership plan		1,652		222					1,874

F-21

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

2002

	Aerospace		Industrial		Corporate			Consolidated
Customer revenues	$	120,891	$	34,412	$	—		$	155,303
Intersegment revenues		—		—		—			—
Eliminations									—
Operating profit (loss)		30,978		1,843		(1,268	)		31,553
Amortization of intangible assets									3,721
Income from operations									27,832
Interest expense									21,434
Other, net									(97	)
Income before tax								$	6,495
Capital expenditures		1,240		545					1,785
Depreciation		2,796		1,362		450			4,608
Compensation expense recognized in connection with employee stock ownership plan		1,205		139					1,344

~~F-18~~ 14. Related Party Transactions

Upsilon International Corporation (“UIC”) is the exclusive distributor of Argo-Tech engine fuel pump and certain airframe product manufactured at our Cleveland, Ohio facility and is a non-exclusive sales agent for engine overhaul and repair for the entire international market under a long-term distribution agreement. UIC is owned by YC International, Inc., a stockholder of AT Holdings Corporation, which is also under the control of a stockholder of AT Holdings Corporation. We believe that this distribution agreement was entered into on terms and conditions customary for the industry in all respects with the exception of the contract term and termination provisions, which are more favorable to UIC than industry norm. The dollar amount of transactions for each of the last three fiscal years can be found in Note 15. Amounts owed to Argo-Tech by UIC under normal terms and conditions as of October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003 and October 26, 2002 were $2.0 million, $3.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively.


15.	Major Customers and Export Sales

During the fiscal years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company had revenues in excess of 10% from only one customer (in thousands):


	2004		2003		2002

Upsilon International Corporation	$	20,326	$	19,321	$	21,231

During the fiscal years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, export sales to foreign customers were comprised of the following (in thousands):


		2004		2003		2002

Europe		$	32,823	$	30,371	$	28,002
All others (individually less than 10%)			47,382		36,320		40,576

	Total	$	80,205	$	66,691	$	68,578


16.	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company has various financial instruments, including cash and short-term investments and long-term debt. The Company has determined the estimated fair value of these financial instruments by soliciting available

F-22

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~2001~~market information and utilizing appropriate valuation methodologies, which require judgment. The Company believes that the carrying values of the short-term investments, Term Loans and Senior Notes approximates their fair value. The fair value of the Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes approximated $189.2 million at October 25, 2003 based upon quoted market prices. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. A 10% fluctuation in interest rates would not materially affect Argo-Tech’s financial condition, result of operations or cash flow.

	Aerospace		Industrial			Corporate			Consolidated
Customer revenues	$	142,000	$	31,208		$	—		$	173,208
Intersegment revenues				10			—			10
Eliminations										(10	)
Operating profit (loss)		47,548		(252	)		(1,622	)		45,674
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets										7,515
Income from operations										38,159
Interest expense										24,534
Other, net										(51	)
Income before tax									$	13,676
Capital expenditures		1,453		432						1,885
Depreciation		3,124		1,165			1,270			5,559
Compensation expense recognized in connection with employee stock ownership plan		1,791		300						2,091
Compensation expense recognized in connection with stock options							526			526


17.	Stock Options

~~14.~~ The ~~Major~~Company ~~Customers~~has ~~and~~four ~~Export~~stock-based ~~Sales~~compensation plans:

~~During~~1991 ~~the~~Performance ~~fiscal~~Stock ~~years~~Option Plan — ~~ended~~The ~~2003,~~1991 Performance ~~2002~~Stock ~~and 2001,~~Option Plan provides for option grants for the purchase ~~Company~~of ~~had~~AT ~~revenues~~Holdings’ incommon ~~excess~~stock. The exercise price of each option is $10%.00 per ~~from~~share. ~~only~~All ~~one~~of the options ~~customer~~under (this plan became fully vested in ~~thousands):~~January 1999. At October 30, 2004, 18,230 options were outstanding.

		2003				2002				2001
Customer A (Related Party)		$	19,321			$	21,231			$	26,792

1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan — The 1991 Management Incentive Stock Option Plan provides for option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings’ common stock. The exercise price of each option is $10.00 per share. All of the options under this plan became fully vested in January 1999. At October 30, 2004, 2,940 options were outstanding.

~~During~~1998 ~~the~~Equity ~~fiscal~~Replacement ~~years~~Stock ~~ended~~Option Plan — ~~2003,~~The ~~2002~~1998 ~~and~~Equity ~~2001,~~Replacement ~~export~~Stock ~~sales~~Option Plan was established to ~~foreign~~provide ~~customers~~for option ~~were~~grants ~~comprised~~for the purchase of AT Holdings’ common stock. The exercise price of each option is $40.00 per share. All of the options under this plan were fully vested upon ~~following~~issuance. ~~(in~~At ~~thousands):~~October 30, 2004, 19,135 options were outstanding.

		2003		2002		2001
Europe		$	30,371	$	28,002	$	34,954
All others (individually less than 10%)			36,320		40,576		45,841
	Total	$	66,691	$	68,578	$	80,795

1998 Incentive Plan — The 1998 Incentive Plan was established to provide option grants for the purchase of AT Holdings’ common stock, at prices that may be more than, less than, or equal to the fair market value of the shares, as the Board or Compensation Committee of AT Holdings may determine at the time of grant. There have been three option grants under the 1998 Incentive Plan, the first in 1999 with an exercise price of $100.11, the second in 2001 with an exercise price of $69.18 and the third in 2002 with an exercise price of $49.79. The option agreement governing the options granted in 1999 provides that such options vest in 20% increments over five successive years. For any year in which the EBITDA of the company exceeds 105% of the target EBITDA, an additional 13 1/3% of the optioned shares will vest. Effective November 2, 2000 all holders of options granted in 1999 agreed to the cancellation of the portion of the 1999 options which were not vested at such date. Pursuant to the plan, such cancelled options are available for new grants. The option agreement governing the options granted under the plan in September 2001 and March 2002 provides for vesting as follows: 33.3% at the time of issuance and 33.3% on the anniversary date of the grant over the next two years. All options granted under the plan expire ten years from the date of grant. In the event that AT Holdings’ common stock becomes registered or traded on a national exchange or in the event of a change in control, all options will become exercisable in full. At October 30, 2004, 87,610 options were vested and outstanding.

15 The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in 2001 and 2002, respectively: risk-free interest rates of 5.0% ~~Fair~~and ~~Value~~4.875% and expected lives of ~~Financial~~10 years ~~Instruments~~for each of the option plan grants. AT Holdings does not pay a dividend and because it is a nonpublic entity, expected volatility over the life of the options is not estimated.

~~The Company has various financial instruments, including cash and short~~F-~~term investments and long-term debt.~~23 ~~The Company has determined the estimated fair value of these~~ ~~financial instruments by soliciting available market information~~ ~~and utilizing appropriate valuation methodologies, which require~~ judgment. The Company believes that the carrying values of the short-term investments and term loans approximates their fair value. The fair value of the Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes approximated $189.2 million at October 25, 2003 based upon quoted market prices. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. A 10% fluctuation in interest rates would not materially affect Argo-Tech’s financial condition, result of operations or cash flow.

F-19

ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of AT Holdings Corporation)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~16.~~ A ~~Contingencies~~summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans as of October 30, 2004, October 25, 2003 and October 26, 2002, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:



	2004

				Weighed Average
	Shares			Exercise Price

Outstanding at beginning of year		133,713		$	50.20
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(4,000	)		49.79
Cancelled		(1,790	)		71.77
Outstanding at end of year		127,923			49.91
Options exercisable at year-end		127,923
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year	$	—



	2003

				Weighed Average
	Shares			Exercise Price

Outstanding at beginning of year		137,027		$	50.53
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(390	)		10.00
Cancelled		(2,924	)		71.08
Outstanding at end of year		133,713			50.20
Options exercisable at year-end		115,175
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year	$	—



		2002

Discount rate