UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to ______________

Commission file number: 333-141521

Game Trading Technologies, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		20-5433090
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

10957 McCormick Road, Hunt Valley, Maryland		21031
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

( 410) 316-9900

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~August~~November 1518, 2011, there were 4,226,256 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Game Trading Technologies, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



Item 1. Financial Statements	3

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis About Market Risk	31

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	31

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings	33

Item 1A. Risk Factors	33

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	33

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	33

Item 4. Removed and Reserved	33

Item 5. Other Information	33

Item 6. Exhibits	33

SIGNATURES	34

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Game Trading Technologies, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~947~~338,~~797~~369		$	827,526
Restricted Cash		~~791~~1,~~171~~177,440			-
Accounts Receivable - Net of Allowance of $100,000 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		3,936,376			2,795,864
Accounts Receivable - Net of Allowance of $300,000 and $100,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		4,291,128			2,795,864
Inventories, net of allowance for inventory write-off of $175,000, respectively		41,~~921~~836,~~104~~639			9,678,153
Prepaid Expenses And Other		~~266~~44,~~807~~975			72,511
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		107,~~863~~688,~~255~~551			13,374,054
Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $421,276 and $371,893, respectively		~~414~~388,~~562~~552			414,895
Other Assets		17,927			17,927
		-
TOTAL ASSETS	$	118,~~295~~095,~~744~~030		$	13,806,876
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	9,~~569~~311,~~592~~200		$	4,835,668
Product Financing - related party		1838,~~054,403~~938			1,789,562
Product Financing		2,~~199~~392,~~483~~532			-
Accrued expenses and other		~~800~~726,~~416~~186			617,441
Revolving Line of Credit		31,~~447~~216,~~727~~593			4,088,285
Registration Rights Liability		380,000			380,000
Note payable - related party		-			16,255
Revenue
Advances - related party		35,423			-
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITES		1714,~~451~~900,~~621~~872			11,727,211
TOTAL LIABILITIES		1714,~~451~~900,~~621~~872			11,727,211
Redeemable preferred stock, Series A; $.0001 par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized, 2,650,000 shares issued and outstanding at June, 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, net (Face value $5,350,00)		1,504,630			902,759
Redeemable preferred stock, Series A; $.0001 par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized, 2,650,000 shares issued and outstanding at September, 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, net (Face value $5,350,000)		1,839,003			902,759
Stockholders' equity (Deficit)
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 17,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December, 31, 2010, respectively		-			-
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 17,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and December, 31, 2010, respectively		-			-
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 4,226,256 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,		423			423
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 4,226,256 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,		423			423
Additional paid-in capital		8,~~209~~234,~~911~~528			7,867,885
Accumulated deficit		(1516,~~870~~879,~~841~~796	)		(6,691,402	)
Total stockholders' equity (Deficit)		(78,~~660~~644,~~507~~845	)		1,176,906
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	118,~~295~~095,~~744~~030		$	13,806,876

The accompanying notes are integral parts of these financial statements.

Game Trading Technologies, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	For The Three Months Ended June 30,						For The Six Months Ended June 30,
	For The Three Months Ended September 30,						For The Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net Sales	$	78,~~067~~029,~~397~~802		$	68,~~507~~005,~~951~~366		$	1624,~~219~~249,~~519~~321		$	1826,~~033~~038,~~238~~605
Cost of Sales		127,~~914~~291,~~893~~172			57,~~452~~927,~~880~~525			2129,~~715~~006,~~277~~449			1523,~~374~~301,~~233~~759
Gross Profit		(5738,~~847,496~~630	)		177,~~055,071~~841			(54,~~495~~757,~~758~~128	)		2,~~659~~736,~~005~~846
Operating Expenses:
Selling, General and Administrative		1,~~318~~136,~~495~~316			1957,~~278,620~~656			23,~~347~~484,~~920~~235			23,~~613~~570,~~323~~980
Employee Stock Based Compensation		~~392~~358,~~261~~990			~~387~~452,~~933~~285			~~769~~1,~~812~~128,802			~~673~~1,~~966~~126,251
Non-Employee Stock Based Compensation		80120,~~320~~480			-			80200,~~320~~800			1,579,689
Depreciation		26,~~628~~009			1124,~~235~~501			4975,~~383~~392			3559,~~299~~800
Total Operating Expense		1,~~817~~641,~~704~~795			1,~~677~~434,~~788~~442			34,~~247~~889,~~435~~229			46,~~902~~336,~~277~~720
Income (Loss) from Operations:		(7903,~~665,200~~165	)		(~~622~~1,~~717~~356,601	)		(89,~~743~~646,~~193~~357	)		(23,~~243~~599,~~272~~874	)
Other Income (Expenses):
Interest Expense, net		(8131,~~455~~441	)		(1823,~~333~~206	)		(~~112~~143,~~406~~847	)		(83106,~~268~~473	)
Product Financing Liquidated Damages		(~~113~~74,~~200~~349	)		-			(~~323~~398,~~841~~190	)		-
Other income		-			-			-			46,493
Total Other Expenses		(~~194~~105,~~655~~790	)		(1823,~~333~~206	)		(~~436~~542,~~247~~037	)		(3659,~~775~~980	)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes		(71,~~859~~008,~~855~~955	)		(~~641~~1,~~050~~379,807	)		(910,~~179~~188,~~440~~394	)		(23,~~280~~659,~~047~~854	)
Provision for Income Taxes		-			-			-			-
Net Loss	$	(71,~~859~~008,~~855~~955	)	$	(~~641~~1,~~050~~379,807	)	$	(910,~~179~~188,~~440~~394	)	$	(23,~~280~~659,~~047~~854	)
Accretion of preferred dividends		66,875			6670,~~007~~939			~~133~~200,~~750~~625			84155,~~965~~903
Accretion of preferred amortization of beneficial conversion and warrant features		267,498			~~254~~283,~~166~~749			~~534~~802,~~996~~494			~~319~~602,~~166~~915
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(81,~~194~~343,~~228~~328	)	$	(~~961~~1,~~223~~734,495	)	$	(911,~~848~~191,~~186~~513	)	$	(24,~~684~~418,~~178~~672	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Income (loss) per share – basic & diluted	$	(10.8624	)	$	(0.1533	)	$	(2.1741	)	$	(0.5891	)
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding - basic & diluted		4,226,256			4,145,000			4,226,256			34,~~959~~021,~~365~~923

The accompanying notes are integral parts of these financial statements.

Game Trading Technologies, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	For the Period Ended June 30,
	For the Period Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Net Income (Loss)	$	(910,~~179~~188,~~440~~394	)	$	(23,~~280~~659,~~047~~854	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation & Amortization - Property and Equipment		4975,~~383~~392			3559,~~299~~800
Inventory valuation write-off		6,000,000			-
Issuance of Stock Warrants for Services		80,320			1,579,689
Accounts receivable valuation write-off		200,000			-
Stock Options for employee services		769,812			673,966
Issuance of Stock Warrants for Services		200,800			1,579,689
Product Financing Costs		199,483			-
Stock Options for employee services		1,128,802			1,126,251
Product Financing Liquidated Damages		323,841			-
Product Financing Costs		392,532			-
Product Financing Liquidated Damages		398,190			-
Other		-			12,317
Changes in assets and liabilities
Account receivable		(1,~~140~~695,~~512~~264	)		(~~206~~1,~~345~~801,167	)
Inventory		(1,~~242~~841,~~951)~~514			(24,~~352~~860,~~775~~326	)
Accounts payable		4,~~733~~475,~~924~~532			(1707,~~515,038~~640	)
Accrued liabilities		~~182~~108,~~975~~745			8105,~~473~~149
Deferred Expenses		~~17,928~~-			9,801
Prepaid expenses and deposits		~~(51~~67,~~583~~696	)		(~~690~~136,~~971~~568	)
Liabilities of discontinued operation		-			(6788,~~186~~921	)
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		~~743~~3,~~180~~005,546			(48,~~792~~361,~~817~~469	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of fixed assets		(49,050	)		(~~268~~280,~~615~~315	)
Net Cash Provided (Used) In Investing Activities		(49,050	)		(~~268~~280,~~615~~315	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the sale of convertible preferred stock		-			5,675,000
Proceeds (Repayment) from line of credit, net		(~~640~~2,~~558~~871,692	)		2,~~063~~363,285
Net borrowings (repayment) in connection with Product financing facilities		~~149~~(526,~~829~~254	)		-3,599,562
Payments on notes payable		-			(2,750,000	)
Payment of Series A preferred dividends		(66,875	)		(1883,~~958~~979	)
Issuance (Repayment) of note payable-related party		(16,255	)		(390,022	)
Advances from related party		35,423			-
Net Cash Provided (Used) In Financing Activities		(573,859	)		4,579,305
Issuance (Repayment) of note payable-related party		(16,255	)		(392,169	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		120,271			(482,127	)
Net Cash Provided (Used) In Financing Activities		(3,445,653	)		8,411,699
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(489,157	)		(230,085	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		827,526			641,088
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	~~947~~338,~~797~~369		$	~~158~~411,~~961~~003
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information :
Cash paid for interest	$	96154,~~728~~336		$	83106,~~267~~473
Cash paid for taxes	$	-		$	-

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Beneficial conversion feature of redeemable convertible preferred stock	$	-	$	2,067,393
Value of warrants issued with redeemable convertible preferred stock	$	-	$	3,607,607
Conversion of notes payable related party to series A preferred	$	~~25,000~~-	$	25,000
Accretion of discount on redeemable preferred stock	$	~~534~~802,~~996~~494	$	~~319~~602,~~166~~915
Accretion of accrued dividend on redeemable preferred stock	$	~~133~~200,~~750~~625	$	6671,~~007~~924
Inventory Valuation Write-off	$	6,000,000	$	-

The accompanying notes are integral parts of these financial statements.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

Game Trading Technologies, Inc. ("we", "us", "our", "or", the "Company") is a leading provider of comprehensive trading solutions and services for video game retailers, publishers, rental companies, and consumers. Through our trading platform, we provide our customers with extensive services including valuation, procurement, refurbishment, and merchandising of pre-owned video games. Additionally, through our trading platform, we process and market video game consoles, DVDs, and video game accessories, and provide related e-commerce retailing and interactive marketing services.

Business Combination and Corporate Restructure

On February 25, 2010, we completed a “reverse acquisition” transaction, in which we entered into a securities exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Gamers Factory, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Gamers” or the “Company”) and for certain limited purposes, its stockholders. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the shareholders of Gamers transferred all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Gamers to us in exchange for 3,545,000 newly issued shares of our common stock (the “Transaction”). At the time of the Transaction, our corporate name was City Language Exchange, Inc. Following the merger, we changed our name to Game Trading Technologies, Inc. (the “GTTI”) and our current trading symbol is “GMTD.PK.” As a result of the Transaction, Gamers became our wholly-owned subsidiary, with Gamers’ former shareholders acquiring a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

The transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement were accounted for as a “reverse acquisition,” since the stockholders of Gamers owned a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock immediately following the Transaction. Gamers is deemed to be the acquirer in the Transaction and, consequently, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that will be reflected in the financial statements will be those of Gamers and will be recorded at the historical cost basis of Gamers. Except for the right of the holders of our series A convertible preferred stock, as a class, to elect one of our directors, no arrangements or understandings exist among present or former controlling stockholders with respect to the election of members of our board of directors and, to our knowledge, no other arrangements exist that might result in a change of control of our company.

In connection with the closing of the Exchange Agreement, we completed the closing of a private placement (referred to herein as the “February 2010 private placement”) of $3,900,000 of units (each, a “Unit” and collectively, the “Units”) pursuant to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 25, 2010, with each Unit consisting of one share of our series A convertible preferred stock and a warrant to purchase one share of our common stock. Each share of series A convertible preferred stock has a stated value equal to $2.00 per share and is initially convertible at any time into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to $4.00 per share or an aggregate of 975,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock (equivalent to 100% warrant coverage in respect of the shares underlying the series A convertible preferred stock) at an exercise price of $5.00 per share through February 25, 2015.

At the closing of the February 2010 private placement, buyers that purchased shares of our series A convertible preferred stock with a stated value of at least $150,000 received a unit purchase option (the “Unit Purchase Option”) to purchase, on the same terms as those Units sold at the closing of the February 2010 private placement, additional Units of series A convertible preferred stock and warrants equal to 50% of the Units they purchased at the closing of the February 2010 private placement. The shares of common stock underlying the securities issuable upon exercise of a Unit Purchase Option are entitled to the same registration rights as those securities underlying the Units issued at the closing of the February 2010 private placement.

On April 20, 2010, certain holders of Unit Purchase Options exercised Unit Purchase Options to purchase 825,000 Units resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to us of $1,650,000. Each unit (“Unit”) consisted of one share of the Company’s series A convertible preferred stock and a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share through April 20, 2015.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

On April 26, 2010, the holders of certain Unit Purchase Options exercised Options to purchase 62,500 units of the Company’s securities for aggregate gross proceeds of $125,000. Each unit (“Unit”) consisted of one share of the Company’s series A convertible preferred stock and a warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share through April 26, 2015.

Basis of Presentation

Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America, have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information have been included. The results of operations for any interim period presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The consolidated condensed financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements is as follows:

Going Concern

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has reported a net loss of $71,~~859~~088,~~855~~955, and $910,~~179~~188,~~440~~394 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively. In addition, the Company has reported an accumulated deficit of $1516,~~870~~879,~~841~~796 and a working capital deficit of $67,~~588~~212,~~366~~321 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.

The Company believes that its current revenues will be insufficient to satisfy its ongoing capital plan and will require additional financing in order to execute its operating plan and continue as a going concern. If the Company is unable to raise additional financing, it will not have the ability for expansion, repay its debt obligations when due, and/or respond to its market competition. Any of these circumstances would have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. The Company cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity or debt, or in other form.

The Company plans to take the following steps that it believes will be sufficient to provide it with the ability to continue as a going concern. The Company intends to raise capital through asset-based financing and/or the sale of its stock in private placements. The Company believes that with this financing, it will be able to generate additional revenues that will allow it to continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance that ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ will be ~~successful~~able to obtain further financing, do so on reasonable terms, or do so on terms that would not substantially dilute our current stockholders’ equity interests in ~~obtaining~~us. If we are unable to raise additional ~~financing~~funds on a timely basis, or at all, we probably will not be able to continue as a going concern.

Principle of Consolidation

The consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of ~~Game~~the ~~Trading~~Company ~~Technologies, Inc.~~ and its subsidiary. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Equity investments in which the Company exercises significant influence but do not control and are not the primary beneficiary are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in which the Company is not able to exercise significant influence over the investee and which do not have readily determinable fair values are accounted for under the cost method.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

Management’s Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of the consolidated condensed financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated condensed financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts reported in previous period have been reclassified to conform to the Company’s current period presentation.

Reverse Stock Split

Beginning at the open of trading on February 15, 2011, the Company affected a one for two (1:2) reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, with every two (2) shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding being converted into one (1) share of common stock. The Board of Directors and shareholders approved the reverse stock split on October 28, 2010. As a result of the reverse stock split, the Company has approximately 4,226,256 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The conversion and/or exercise prices of our issued and outstanding convertible securities, including shares of our series A convertible preferred stock, stock options and warrants, have been adjusted accordingly.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company periodically maintains cash balances in financial institutions in amounts greater than the federally insured limit of $100,000. Management considers this to be an acceptable business risk.

For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounts Receivable

The Company extends credit to customers without requiring collateral. The Company uses the allowances method to provide for doubtful accounts based on management’s evaluations of the collectability of accounts receivable. Management’s evaluation is based on the Company’s historical collection experience and a review of past-due amounts. Management's estimate is subject to fluctuate if factors considered in the evaluation of the outstanding receivable change such as the financial stability a customer or an unforeseen contract dispute. Based on management’s evaluation of collectability, there is a $300,000 and $100,000 allowance for doubtful accounts as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company wrote off $39239,898 and $292,100 respectively as uncollectible accounts receivables. The Company determines accounts receivable to be delinquent when greater than 30 days past due. Accounts receivable are written off when it is determined that amounts are uncollectible.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC .

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

Inventory

Inventory, consisting of goods held for resale, is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted-average method. At ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, an allowance for obsolete inventory of $175,000, respectively, was deemed necessary based on management’s estimate of the realizability of the inventory. InManagement ~~June~~evaluated ~~2011,~~the weinventory ~~recorded~~based anupon ~~Inventory~~a ~~write-off~~lower ,of ~~which~~cost ~~resulted~~or inmarket anassessment ~~increase~~of ininventory ~~our~~values ~~Cost~~to ofan ~~Goods~~anticipated ~~expense,~~distribution ~~primarily~~of ~~due~~the toprimary ~~obsolescence~~distribution orchannels: ~~lack~~Retail ofReady, ~~marketability~~Consumer ~~for~~Director, ~~the~~or ~~difference~~Bulk. ~~between~~The ~~the~~values ~~cost~~ of ~~inventory and~~ the ~~estimated~~inventory ~~market~~are ~~value~~subject ~~based~~to ~~upon~~change ~~assumptions~~to ~~about~~the ~~future~~extent product demand and market ~~conditions~~values ~~and~~of ~~due~~the todramatically adecrease ~~liquidation~~or ofthe Company reallocates the inventory to ~~satisfy~~a ~~our~~different ~~asset~~distribution ~~based~~channel ~~lender's~~which ~~loan~~may ~~repayment~~result ~~requirements~~in onlonger orsale ~~before~~lead ~~August 26~~times, ~~2011~~additional ~~(see~~refurbishment ~~Note~~requirements 5)or extensive price reductions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization expense is computed using principally accelerated methods over the estimated useful life of the related assets ranging from 3 to 7 years. When assets are sold or retired, their costs and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss resulting from their disposal is included in the statement of operations.

The Company recognizes an impairment loss on property and equipment when evidence, such as the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), indicates that future operations will not produce sufficient revenue to cover the related future costs, including depreciation, and when the carrying amount of the asset cannot be realized through sale. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company assesses long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be fully recoverable. Recoverability of asset groups to be held and used in measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group. The Company evaluated its long-lived assets and no impairment charges were recorded for any of the periods presented.

Revenue Recognition

Included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 650 “Revenue Recognition”

The Company recognizes revenue based on Account Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605 “Revenue Recognition” which contains Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements’ and No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment has occurred, price is fixed or determinable and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Shipment is deemed to have occurred when the Company’s customer has taken titled and assumed the risks and rewards of ownership of the products specified in the purchase order or contracts. The Company's bulk contracts, which constitutes the majority of historical revenue, have stated terms of "FOB destination". The Company had $78,~~067~~029,~~397~~802 and $68,~~507~~005,~~951~~366 and $1624,~~219~~249,~~519~~321 and $1826,~~033~~038,~~238~~605 in revenue for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company includes its outbound shipping and handling costs in selling, general and administrative expenses. Those costs were $~~289~~182,~~376~~055 and $~~404~~587,~~974~~029 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and $~~143~~170,~~434~~062 and $~~387~~557,~~568~~630 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively. Inbound shipping and handling costs are included as an allocation to inventory. Those costs were $~~225~~35,~~995~~299 and $~~515~~550,~~647~~946 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and $65155,~~517~~671 and $~~148~~303,~~086~~757 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30 2010, respectively.

Registration Payment Arrangements

The Company accounts for registration payment arrangements under ASC topic 815-40 "Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity" formerly Financial Accounting Standards board (FASB) Staff Position EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements”. ASC topic 815-40 specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments under a registration payment arrangement should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company accrued an estimated penalty of $380,000 which represents the anticipated penalty due from November 23, 2010 through the Rule 144 restriction period of March 8, 2011.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

Share Based Expenses

ASC 718 "Compensation - Stock Compensation" , codified in SFAS No. 123, prescribes that accounting and reporting standards for all stock-based payments award to employees, including employee stock options, restricted stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights, may be classified as either equity or liabilities. The Company should determine if a present obligation to settle the share-based payment transaction in cash or other assets exists. A present obligation to settle in cash or other assets exists if:

the option to settle by issuing equity instruments lacks commercial substance or

the present obligation is implied because of an entity's past practices or stated policies. If a present obligation exists, the transaction should be recognized as a liability; otherwise, the transaction should be recognized as equity.

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to non-employees and consultants in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50 "Equity - Based Payments to Non-Employees" which codified SFAS 123 and the Emerging Issues Task Force consensus in Issue No. 96-18 ("EITF 96-18"), "Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services". Measurement of share-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be based on the fair value of whichever is more reliably measurable:

the goods or services receive or

the equity instruments issued.

The fair value of the share-based payment transaction should be determined at the earlier of performance commitment date or performance completion date.

Fair value of Financial Instruments

The Company adopted ASC topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, formerly SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements,” effective January 1, 2009. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There was no impact relating to the adoption of ASC 820 to the Company’s financial statements. ASC 820 also describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3: Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

Financial instruments consist principally of cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the accompanying balance sheets approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to any significant currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Income Taxes

Under the asset and liability method prescribed under ASC 740, Income Taxes , The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes. The liability method measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory rates in effect at the balance sheet date to the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts on the financial statements. The resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws as they occur. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

The Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of an uncertain tax position only after considering the probability that a tax authority would sustain the position in an examination. For tax positions meeting a "more-likely-than-not" threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the benefit expected to be realized upon settlement with the tax authority. For tax positions not meeting the threshold, no financial statement benefit is recognized. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the Company has had no uncertain tax positions. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as general and administrative expenses. The Company currently has no federal or state tax examinations nor has it had any federal or state examinations since its inception. All of the Company's tax years are subject to federal and state tax examination.

Income (loss) Per Common Share

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each reporting period. Diluted loss per share includes potentially dilutive securities such as outstanding options and warrants, using various methods such as the treasury stock or modified treasury stock method in the determination of dilutive shares outstanding during each reporting period. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of net loss per share since their effect is anti-dilutive.

Liquidity

As shown in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of ($910,~~179~~188,~~440~~394) for the ~~six~~nine months end ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and a net loss of ($23,~~280~~659,~~047~~854) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the Company’s current liabilities exceed its current assets by $67,~~588~~212,~~366~~321, with cash and cash equivalents representing $~~947~~338,~~797~~309.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

Recent Authoritative Accounting Pronouncements

FASB Accounting Standards Codification

(Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-01) In June 2009, FASB approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“the Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. All existing accounting standard documents, such as FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force and other related literature, excluding guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), have been superseded by the Codification. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification has become nonauthoritative. The Codification did not change GAAP, but instead introduced a new structure that combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. The Codification is effective for interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and impacts the Company’s financial statements as all future references to authoritative accounting literature will be referenced in accordance with the Codification. There have been no changes to the content of the Company’s financial statements or disclosures as a result of implementing the Codification during the year ended December 31, 2010.

As a result of the Company’s implementation of the Codification during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, previous references to new accounting standards and literature are no longer applicable. In the current year financial statements, the Company will provide reference to both new and old guidance to assist in understanding the impacts of recently adopted accounting literature, particularly for guidance adopted since the beginning of the current fiscal year but prior to the Codification.

Subsequent Events

(Included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855 “Subsequent Events” , previously SFAS No. 165 “Subsequent Events”) SFAS No. 165 established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued (“subsequent events”). An entity is required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and the basis for that date. For public entities, this is the date the financial statements are issued. SFAS No. 165 does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other GAAP and did not result in significant changes in the subsequent events reported by the Company. SFAS No. 165 became effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and did not impact the Company’s financial statements. The Company evaluated for subsequent events through the issuance date of the Company’s financial statements. No recognized or non-recognized subsequent events were noted.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

2.	PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The Company’s property and equipment at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consists of the following:

	6/30/11		12/31/10
	9/30/11		12/31/10
Machinery and equipment	$	586,190	$	537,140
Computer equipment and software		249,648		249,648
	$	835,838	$	786,788
Less accumulated depreciation		~~421~~447,~~276~~286		371,893
Property and Equipment, net	$	~~414~~388,~~562~~552	$	414,895

Depreciation expense included as a charge to income was $26,~~628~~009 and $4975,~~383~~392 for the three and ~~six~~nine months end ~~June~~September 30, 2011 compared to $1124,~~235~~501 and $3559,~~299~~800 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively.

3.	PRODUCT FINANCING

Obligations and Commitments under Product Financing Arrangement

InThe ~~May 2011, the~~ Company entered into a product financing arrangement with a party under ASC 470-40 Product Financing Arrangements. Accordingly, the remaining inventory and the related short-term debt have been included in the Balance Sheet at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and the corresponding costs have been included in Statement of Operations as Cost of Sales. The Company is obligated to pay the vendor under this product financing arrangement upon its receipt of payments from financed products.

On April 15, 2011, the Company entered into a Sales Agency and Purchasing/Sales Services Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Gamers Finance, LLC (“Gamers Finance”) pursuant to which Gamers Finance engaged the Company to procure, purchase and sell up pre-owned video games and associated packaging materials, together with such other merchandise as designated by Gamers Finance, on behalf of Gamers Finance for a period from April 15, 2011 until October 15, 2011. In consideration for the services to be performed by Gamers under the Sales Agreement, the Company is entitled to receive 70% of the aggregate net profit, if any, from the sale of products procured by Gamers Finance with the assistance of the Company. The aggregate net profits is defined as gross revenue net of i) applicable sales taxes ii) sales expenses iii) all discounts, allowances and credits, less the sum of (1) aggregate purchase price of products (2) all shipping and delivery costs and (3) a capital charge of 0.115% per day of the Term of all committed capital. If the Company consummates an equity or equity-linked financing pursuant to which it raise aggregate gross proceeds of at least $6,000,000, Gamers Finance shall have the right to transfer, assign and sell to the Company (i) any outstanding receivables for the face value of such receivables or (ii) products not sold to any purchasers for the purchase price of such products plus 10%. In addition, to the extent the Company is delinquent in paying Gamers Finance any such amounts to which it is entitled under the Sales Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay liquidated damages to Gamers Finance, for each day that we are delinquent in our payment obligations, in an amount equal to 0.25% of the amount not paid to Gamers Finance when due. Furthermore, Mr. Hays, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer provided a personal guaranty in favor of Gamers Finance through the agreement period October 15, 2011. The Company has product advances of approximately $2,~~042~~392,~~687~~532 from Gamers Finance as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 including accrued gross profit allocation of $68161,~~383~~441 and accrued capital charge of $~~131~~231,~~100~~091. Gamers Finance maintains a restricted cash account for unexpended Committed Capital for future purchases. The restricted cash balance as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 amounted to $~~791~~1,~~171~~177,440.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

4.	PRODUCT FINANCING - RELATED PARTY

Obligations and Commitments under Product Financing Arrangement

In 2010, the Company entered into numerous product financing arrangement with a related party under ASC 470-40 Product Financing Arrangements. Accordingly, the remaining inventory and the related short-term debt have been included in the Balance Sheet at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and the corresponding costs have been included in Statement of Operations as Cost of Sales. The Company is obligated to pay the vendor under this product financing arrangement upon its receipt of payments from financed products.

On July 22, 2010, Gamers entered into a Sales Agency and Purchasing/Sales Services Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with DK Trading Partners, LLC (“DK Trading”) pursuant to which DK Trading engaged Gamers to procure, purchase and sell up to $3,000,000 of pre-owned video games and associated packaging materials, together with such other merchandise as designated by DK Trading, on behalf of DK Trading for a period from August 13, 2010 until September 15, 2010. In consideration for the services to be performed by Gamers under the Sales Agreement, Gamers is entitled to receive 100% of the net profit, if any, from the sale of products procured by DK Trading with the assistance of Gamers in excess of $600,000. If we or Gamers consummate an equity or equity-linked financing pursuant to which we raise aggregate gross proceeds of at least $3,000,000, DK Trading shall have the right to transfer, assign and sell to Gamers (i) any outstanding receivables for the face value of such receivables or (ii) products not sold to any purchasers for the purchase price of such products plus 20%. ~~DK Trading has agreed to limit its right to cause us to purchase outstanding receivables or products from them in connection with this offering to $500,000~~. In addition, to the extent we are delinquent in paying DK Trading any such amounts to which it is entitled under the Sales Agreement, we are obligated to pay liquidated damages to DK Trading, for each day that we are delinquent in our payment obligations, in an amount equal to 0.25% of the amount not paid to DK Trading when due. DK Trading is controlled by its managers, who include, among others, Gregg Smith, a shareholder of the Company. The Company expensed liquidated damages penalties in the amount of $~~113~~74,~~200~~349 and $0 for the three months and $~~324~~398,~~194~~190 and $0 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The balance due to DK Trading at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 amounted to $1838,~~054,403~~938 and $1,789,562 including $~~629~~704,~~841~~376 and $305,647 as accumulated liquidated damages for delinquent payments, respectively.

On January 27, 2010, Gamers entered into a reseller agreement (the “2010 Reseller Agreement”) with DK Trading pursuant to which DK Trading engaged Gamers to procure, purchase and sell up to $1,000,000 of pre-owned video games and associated packaging materials, together with such other merchandise as designated by DK Trading, on behalf of DK Trading for a period from January 27, 2010 until April 26, 2010. In consideration for the services to be performed by Gamers under the 2010 Reseller Agreement, Gamers was entitled to receive 50% of the net profit, if any, from the sale of products procured by DK Trading with the assistance of Gamers in excess of $80,000. The Company paid DK Trading $95,000 in accordance with the agreement. In addition, the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of 405,000 warrants issued to DK Trading from $2.50 to $1.30. Furthermore, Mr. Hays, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer provided a personal guaranty in favor of DK Trading through the agreement period April 26, 2010.

5.	Working Capital Line of Credit

Bank of America Revolver

On May 4, 2010, Gamers entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A. (the “Bank”) The Loan Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit to the Borrower equal to the lesser of (i) $2,500,000 or the sum of (a) 75% of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Loan Agreement) and (b) the lesser of $1,500,000 or 20% of the value of Acceptable Inventory (as defined in the Loan Agreement).

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

On November 23, 2010, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with the Bank. The Amended and Restated Loan Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit to the Company equal to the lesser of (i) $5,000,000 or (ii) the sum of (a) 80% of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement) and (b) the lesser of $1,500,000 or 20% of the value of Acceptable Inventory (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement).

The Company has the right to prepay loans under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement in whole or in part at any time. All amounts borrowed under the Loan Agreement was due on or before May 27, 2011. Loans under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to BBA LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. In connection with the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, as security for any obligation of the Company to Bank under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, the Company and Bank entered into an amended and restated security agreement, dated November 23, 2010 pursuant to which the Borrower granted Bank a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Company.

On January 28, 2011, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with Bank. The First Amendment provides that the revolving line of credit to the Company is now equal to the lesser of (i) $5,000,000 or (ii) the sum of (a) (1) for the period lasting from December 31, 2010 through and including February 15, 2011, 85% of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement) and (2) thereafter, 80% of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement) (b) (1) for the period lasting from December 31, 2010 through and including February 15, 2011, the lesser of $2,000,000 or 25% of the value of Acceptable Inventory (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement) and (2) thereafter, the lesser of $1,500,000 or 20% of the value of Acceptable Inventory (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement).

On May 12, 2011, the Company entered into the second amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the amended and restated loan agreement, dated November 23, 2010, as amended on January 28, 2011 (the “Amended Loan Agreement”) with Bank. The Second Amendment provides, among other things, that (i) the credit limit (x) is currently $3,858,285 and will increase upon certain events as set forth in the Second Amendment, (ii) the percentage of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Amended Loan Agreement) in calculating the amount available under revolving line of credit to the Company has been reduced from 80% to 75%, (iii) the account balance does not include the amount of any counterclaims or offsets which have been or may be asserted against the Company by the account debtor (including offsets for any “contra accounts” owed by the Company to the account debtor for goods purchased by the Borrower or for services performed for the Company, (iv) effective April 1, 2011, the interest rate is a rate per year equal to the BBA LIBOR Daily Floating Rate plus an additional margin of 800 basis points per annum and (v) the expiration date of the line of credit has been extended from May 21, 2011 until August 26, 2011, or such earlier date as provided in the Second Amendment.

On June 24, 2011, the Company received a letter dated June 23, 2011 from Bank pursuant to which the Bank anticipates (and the Company has acknowledged) that the Borrower will fail to comply with the financial covenants set forth in the Loan Agreement for the period tested as of June 30, 2011 because the Company ~~will~~would not achieve, for the period tested as of June 30, 2011, either the Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) required by Section 8.3 of the Loan Agreement or the Basic Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) required by Section 8.4 of the Loan Agreement. As a result, the Bank informed the Company that this constitutes an event of default under Section 9.14 of the Loan Agreement (the “Existing Default”) and other events of default may also exist and are not waived under the Loan Agreement (together with the Existing Default, the “Events of Default”).

As a result of the occurrence of the Events of Default, the Bank stopped making any additional credit available to the Company and will not make any additional advances under the Line of Credit. All availability under the Line of Credit was terminated and the Bank reserved its right to collect any applicable default rate of interest, as provided under the Loan Agreement. In addition, the Company will continue to incur fees and costs in connection with the Events of Default and the Line of Credit, all of which shall be the Company 's responsibility. Furthermore, the Bank specifically reserved the right under the Loan Agreement, from time to time without notice, to declare any and all Obligations to be immediately due and payable.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the balance on the revolver was $31,~~447~~216,~~727~~593. The Company has incurred interest expense of $8131,~~240~~441 and $~~112~~143,~~076~~847 and $8,716 and $8,716 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The BBA LIBOR rate was .1923% as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

6.	NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

Note Payable – TW Development LLC

On December 6, 2007, the Company issued a note payable of $500,000 to TW Development LLC. The note bears interest at 6% and matured on April 4, 2008, and had been extended to December 31, 2011. The Company may repay this note at any time, in whole or in part, without penalty or additional interest. The balance as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $0 and $16,255, respectively. TW Development LLC is wholly owned by, our Chief Executive Officer, Todd Hays.

7.	REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK

A summary of the Redeemable Preferred Stock at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:

	6/30/11			12/31/10
	9/30/11			12/31/10
Redeemable preferred stock, Series A	$	5,350,000		$	5,350,000
Beneficial conversion feature, net of accumulated amortization of $618,894 and $423,996 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.		(1,448,499	)		(1,643,397	)
Beneficial conversion feature, net of accumulated amortization of $716,343 and $423,996 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.		(1,351,050	)		(1,643,397	)
Value attributable to warrants attached to notes, net of accumulated amortization of $1,076,986 and $736,888 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.		(2,530,621	)		(2,870,719	)
Value attributable to warrants attached to notes, net of accumulated amortization of $1,247,035 and $736,888 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.		(2,360,572	)		(2,870,719	)
Accumulated Dividends		~~133~~200,~~750~~625			66,875
	$	1,~~504~~839,~~630~~003		$	902,759

We are authorized to issue shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A”), $2.00 stated value. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, 20,000,000 shares of our Preferred Stock were authorized, with 2,837,500 shares designated as Series A, and 2,675,000 shares issued and outstanding. The rights and preferences of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock include, among other things, the following:

liquidation preferences (120% of stated value);

dividend preferences;

The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock provides an annual dividend of 5% payable quarterly in arrears in cash or stock. Each Series A Preferred share is convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time, into one share of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $2.00 per share, subject to adjustments for anti-dilution provisions.

On February 25, 2010, the Company sold 1,950,000 shares of Series A with attached warrants to purchase an aggregate of 975,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $4.00 per share. The Company received $3,900,000 from the sale of the Series A shares. Since the Series A may ultimately be redeemable at the option of the holder, the carrying value of the preferred stock, net of discount and accumulated dividends, has been classified as temporary equity on the balance sheet at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

There are no certain conditions or specified redemptions date upon which a conversion would be required therefore the Company is relegated to the decision of the Series A holder as to any conversion except for an Automatic Conversion upon a Qualified Public Offering. In accordance with the provisions of the Company’s series A convertible preferred stock, upon the consummation of an underwritten public offering for gross proceeds of at least $10,000,000 at a per share price equal to at least $8.00 per share and provided all of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of o the Company’s series A convertible preferred stock and upon exercise of the warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock issued to the investors in our February 2010 private placement are registered or such registration requirement is waived, all outstanding shares of series A convertible preferred stock plus all accrued but unpaid dividends thereon shall automatically be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $4.00 per share.

In accordance with ASC 470 Topic “ Debt" a portion of the proceeds were allocated to the warrants based on their relative fair value, which totaled $2,444,729 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. Further, the Company attributed a beneficial conversion feature of $1,455,271 to the Series A preferred shares based upon the difference between the effective conversion price of those shares and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model are as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 74%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2.2%, (4) expected life of 5 years, and (5) estimated fair value of GTTI common stock of $8.50 per share. The expected term of the warrants represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards and giving consideration to the contractual terms. The amounts attributable to the warrants and beneficial conversion feature, aggregating $3,900,000 have been recorded as a discount and deducted from the face value of the preferred stock. Since the preferred stock is classified as temporary equity, the discount will be amortized over the period from issuance to February 2015 (the initial redemption date) as a charge to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings).

On April 20, 2010 and April 26, 2010, certain holders of Unit Purchase Options exercised Unit Purchase Options to purchase 825,000 and 62,500 shares, respectively of Series A resulting in aggregate gross proceeds to us of $1,650,000 and $125,000, respectively. ~~Since~~The ~~the Series A may ultimately be redeemable at the option of the holder, the~~ carrying value of the preferred stock, net of discount and accumulated dividends, has been classified as temporary equity on the balance sheet at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

In accordance with ASC 470 Topic “ Debt" a portion of the proceeds were allocated to the warrants based on their relative fair value, which totaled $1,162,878 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. Further, the Company attributed a beneficial conversion feature of $612,122 to the Series A preferred shares based upon the difference between the effective conversion price of those shares and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model are as follows: (1) dividend yield of 0%; (2) expected volatility of 74%, (3) weighted average risk-free interest rate of 2.2%, (4) expected life of 5 years, and (5) estimated fair value of GTTI common stock of $9.40 per share. The expected term of the warrants represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards and giving consideration to the contractual terms. The amounts attributable to the warrants and beneficial conversion feature, aggregating $1,775,000, have been recorded as a discount and deducted from the face value of the preferred stock. Since the preferred stock is classified as temporary equity, the discount will be amortized over the period from issuance to April 2015 (the initial redemption date) as a charge to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings).

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC .

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

Effective June 30, 2010, the holders of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock and of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of common stock (collectively, the “Warrants”) issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, agreed to amend the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock and Warrants in the following manner:

·	The parties agreed to add a provision to the certificate of designation for the Series A Preferred Stock whereby the minimum price in which the conversion price of the Series A Preferred Stock may be reduced shall be equal to $1.00;
·	The parties agreed to add a provision to the Warrants whereby the minimum price in which the exercise price of the Warrants may be reduced shall be equal to $1.00;

The parties agreed to add a provision to the Purchase Agreement whereby until the 36 month anniversary of the date of the Purchase Agreement, the Company shall not issue any of its equity securities below $1.00 without the prior written consent of any holder who was issued a Warrant for an aggregate of 2% or more of the Warrants initially issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.

The charge to additional paid in capital for amortization of discount and costs for the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $~~534~~802,~~996~~494 and $~~319~~602,~~166~~915, respectively.

For the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 we have accrued dividends of $~~133~~200,~~750~~625 and $66,875, respectively. The accrued dividends have been charged to additional paid-in capital (since there is a deficit in retained earnings) and the net unpaid accrued dividends been added to the carrying value of the preferred stock.

Registration Rights Liquidated Damages

The Company agreed to file a “resale” registration statement with the SEC within 180 days after the final closing of the private placement and the issuance of the debentures covering all shares of common stock sold in the private placement and underlying the debentures, as well as the warrants attached to the private placement. The Company has agreed to its best efforts to have such “resale” registration statement declared effective by the SEC as soon as possible and, in any event, within 120 days after the initial closing of the private placement and the issuance of the debentures.

In addition, with respect to the shares of common stock sold in the private placement and underlying the warrants, the Company agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the “resale” registration statement from the effective date until the earlier of (i) 18 months after the date of the closing of the private placement or (ii) the date on which all securities registered under the registration statement (a) have been sold, or (b) are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144, at which time exempt sales may be permitted for purchasers of the Units, subject to the Company’s right to suspend or defer the use of the registration statement in certain events.

The registration rights agreement requires the payment of liquidated damages to the investors of approximately 2% per month of the aggregate proceeds of $5,675,000 or the value of the unregistered shares at the time that the liquidated damages are assessed, until the registration statement is declared effective, payable at the option of the Company. On October 22, 2010, the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series A Warrant issued in our February 2010 private placement agreed to waive any liquidated damages payable as a result of the failure to have a registration statement declared effective by October 23, 2010 until November 23, 2010. In accordance with ASC topic 815-40, the Company evaluated the likelihood of achieving registration statement effectiveness. Accordingly, the Company has accrued an estimate of $380,000 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, to account for these potential liquidated damages from November 23, 2010 through the Rule 144 restriction period of March 8, 2011.

8.	CAPITAL STOCK

The Company has authorized 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $.0001 per share. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has authorized 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A preferred stock, of which 2,837,500 shares of preferred stock are designated as Series A Preferred Stock and 2,675,000 shares are issued and outstanding. The company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $.0001 per share. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has 4,226,256, respectively, of shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

On February 25, 2010, we completed a “reverse acquisition” transaction, in which we entered into a securities exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Gamers Factory, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Gamers” or the “Company”) and for certain limited purposes, its stockholders. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the shareholders of Gamers transferred all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Gamers to us in exchange for 3,545,000 newly issued shares of our common stock (the “Transaction”). As a result of the Transaction, Gamers became our wholly-owned subsidiary, with Gamers’ former shareholders acquiring a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

9.	STOCK OPTIONS & WARRANTS

Employee Stock Options

The following table summarizes the changes in the options outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to employees of the Company under a non-qualified employee stock option plan.

Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	1.80		60,000	$	1.80		4.8661		20,000	$	1.80
	4.50		500,000		4.50		3.6641		166,667		4.50
	5.00		~~137~~25,~~500~~000		5.00		43.1444		5416,~~167~~667		5.00
	8.20		25,000		8.20		4.5025		8,333		8.20
	9.20		50,000		9.20		3.6944		33,333		9.20
	9.50		20,000		9.50		3.8156		136,~~333~~667		9.50
			792,500				3.87		295,833
			680,000				3.55		251,667

A summary of the Company’s stock awards for options as of December 31, 2010 and changes for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 is presented below:

	Options and Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, December 31, 2010		742,500	$	5.24
Granted		60,000		1.80
Exercised		—		—
Expired/Cancelled		(10122,~~000~~500)		95.5037
Outstanding, June 30, 2011		792,500		4.92
Outstanding, September 30, 2011		680,000		4.91
Exercisable, June 30, 2011		295,833		4.95
Exercisable, September 30, 2011		251,667		4.95

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted to employees during the ~~six~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010 and the weighted-average significant assumptions used to determine those fair values, using a Black-Scholes-Merton (“Black-Scholes”) option pricing model are as follows:

	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Significant assumptions (weighted-average):
Risk-free interest rate at grant date		2.2	%		3.5 %	%
Expected stock price volatility		74	%		74 %	%
Expected dividend payout		-			-
Expected option life (in years)		5.0			5.0
Expected forfeiture rate		0	%		0 %	%
Fair value per share of options granted	$	1.10		$	3.36

The expected life of awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. The Company has no historical experience with which to establish a basis for determining an expected life of these awards. Therefore, the Company only gave consideration to the contractual terms and did not consider the vesting schedules, exercise patterns and pre-vesting and post-vesting forfeitures significant to the expected life of the option award.

We estimate the volatility of our common stock based on the calculated historical volatility of similar entities in industry, in size and in financial leverage whose shares prices are publicly available. The Company based the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term equal to the expected life of the award. The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the Company used an expected dividend yield of zero in the Black-Scholes option valuation model.

Total stock-based compensation expense in connection with options granted to employees recognized in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 was $~~392~~358,~~261~~990 and $~~769~~1,~~812~~128,802 and for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $~~387~~452,~~933~~285 and $~~673~~1,~~966~~126,251, respectively, net of tax effect. Additionally, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and unvested as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 is $0.

Warrants

The following table summarizes the changes in the warrants outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2011, and the related prices for the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to non-employees of the Company. These warrants were issued in lieu of cash compensation for services performed or financing expenses and in connection with the Series A preferred private placement.

Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	1.30		560,000	$	1.30		2.5631		560,000	$	1.30
	4.00		2,118,438		4.00		3.8762		2,118,438		4.00
			2,678,438				3.5934		2,678,438

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

A summary of the Company’s stock awards for warrants as of December 31, 2010 and changes for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 is presented below:

	Options and Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, December 31, 2010		2,023,750	$	3.98
Granted		654,688		4.00
Exercised		—		—
Expired/Cancelled		—		—
Outstanding, June 30, 2011		2,678,438		3.45
Outstanding, September 30, 2011		2,678,438		3.34
Exercisable, June 30, 2011		2,678,438		3.45
Exercisable, September 30, 2011		2,678,438		3.34

The Company issued 300,000 compensatory warrants to non-employees in conjunction with the product financing transaction during the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011. The warrants entitled the holder to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock per warrant, have a term of five years from the date of issuance with 100% coverage and an exercise price of $4.00. The warrants are exercisable on a cashless exercise basis. Under ACS 718 "Compensation - Stock Compensation" (formerly FASB Statement 123R), the Company estimates the fair value of each stock award at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for the grants, respectively; dividend yield of zero percent for all periods; expected volatility is 74% ; risk-free interest rate 2.12%; expected lives ranging from three years to five years.

The Company issued 1,418,750 warrants to Series A preferred stockholders and 200,000 compensatory warrants to non-employees during the year ended December 31, 2010. The Series A Warrants entitled the holder to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock per warrant, have a term of five years from the date of issuance with 100% coverage and an exercise price of $5.00. The warrants shall become exercisable on a cashless exercise basis if the underlying shares have not been fully registered within twelve months of the closing of the February 2010 private placement transaction. Under ACS 718 "Compensation - Stock Compensation" (formerly FASB Statement 123R), the Company estimates the fair value of each stock award at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for the grants, respectively; dividend yield of zero percent for all periods; expected volatility is 74% ; risk-free interest rate .41%; expected lives ranging from three years to five years.

The Company issued 354,688 additional warrants and revised the exercise price from $5.00 to $4.00 to the Series A Warrant holders as the Company did not achieve an EBITDA level by March 31, 2011 in accordance with the Series A preferred warrant agreements issued in February and April 2010.

Total non-employee stock-based compensation expense in connection with warrants recognized in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 $80120,~~320~~480 and $80200,~~320~~800 and for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $0 and $1,579,689, respectively, net of tax effect.

10.	RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In September 2011, our Chief Executive Officer, Todd Hays, advanced $35,423 to the Company for working capital purposes. These advances may not have formal repayment terms or arrangements.

The Company had a note payable outstanding of $16,255 due to TW Development, LLC, a company wholly owned by Todd Hays, our chief executive officer as of December 31, 2010. The note was paid in full in June 2011. For information regarding the note payable, see “Note Payable – Related Party” in Note 6 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein.

On February 25, 2010, Mr. Hays, participated in the private placement of Series A Preferred Stock, purchasing 50,000 shares of Series A convertible redeemable preferred stock (convertible into 12,500 shares of common stock) and warrants to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

In connection with the Series A Preferred Stock private placement transaction, on April 20, 2010, the Company entered into an Executive Officer Reimbursement Agreement with Todd Hays, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which the Mr. Hays agreed to convert a portion of outstanding indebtedness of the Company owed to him into Series A shares and Warrants pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement. Mr. Hays converted $25,000 of outstanding indebtedness into 12,500 Series A shares and Warrants to purchase 6,250 shares of Common Stock.

In 2010, the Company entered into certain agreements with DK Trading pursuant to which DK Trading engaged the Company to procure, purchase and sell pre-owned video games and associated packaging materials, together with such other merchandise as designated by DK Trading, on behalf of DK Trading. See Note 4 Product Financing Agreement. DK Trading is controlled by its managers, who include, among others, Gregg Smith, a shareholder of the Company.

In 2009, DK Trading earned a referral fee commission from the Company for 50% of the net profit earned on a one-time transaction in the amount of $285,967. The fee was paid in 2010.

In October 2010, the Company entered into a six-month professional services agreement with Evolution Corporate Advisors, LLC for consulting services in the amount of $65,000 and additional expenses of $35,000. Evolution Corporate Advisors, LLC is owned by Mr. Gregg Smith, a shareholder of the Company.

In December 2010, Mr. Michael DuGally joined the Company's Board of Directors. Mr. DuGally is president of Noram International Partners, Inc. a customer and a vendor to the Company and for the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010 had sales of $~~232~~94,~~735~~900 and $~~100~~76,~~798~~481 and purchases of $9084,~~233~~709 and $1027,~~758~~726, respectively.

From time to time, the Company has received advances from certain of its officers and employees to meet short term working capital needs. These advances may not have formal repayment terms or arrangements. Future advances are subjected to approval from the Company's independent directors.

11.	LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

The following table presents the computations of basic and diluted losses per share:.

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net loss	$	(71,~~859~~008,~~855~~955	)	$	(~~641~~1,~~050~~379,807	)	$	(910,~~179~~188,~~440~~394	)	$	(23,~~280~~659,~~047~~854	)
Weighted average common shares - basic & diluted		4,226,256			4,145,000			4,226,256			34,~~959~~021,~~365~~923
Net loss per share
Net loss per share - basic & diluted	$	(10.8624	)	$	(0.1533	)	$	(2.1741	)	$	(0.5891	)

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and three and ~~six~~nine months ended 2010, there were 1,~~707~~664,~~038~~235 and 2,893,586 potential shares were excluded from shares used to calculate diluted losses per share, respectively, as their inclusion would reduce net losses per share.

12.	BUSINESS CONCENTRATION

Revenue from three (3) and two (2) major customers accounted for a combined $1118,~~506~~352,~~880~~485 and $1420,~~348~~375,~~707~~506 of revenue for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These amounts represent 7076% and 8078% of the Company’s revenue for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, these customers accounted for 6375% and 3158% of accounts receivable, respectively.

Purchases from five (5) major suppliers approximated $1115,~~808~~252,~~874~~724 of purchases, and ~~two~~four (24) major suppliers approximated $513,~~597~~772,~~838~~946 of purchases, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These amounts represent 8078% and 3453% of the Company’s supplies for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, these suppliers accounted for 7580% and 2521% of accounts payable, respectively.

13.	COMMITMENTS

Obligations

The Company has entered into an operating lease agreement for its warehouse and corporate offices located in Hunt Valley, MD. The current lease term expiration date is January 31, 2012. On October 14, 2010, the Company entered into an extension of the operating lease agreement including an additional 10,800 square feet through January 31, 2018.

GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC .

and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~June~~September 30, 2011

Future minimum payments required under operating leases at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 are as follows:

Year Ending December 31:
2011 (remainder of the year)		~~111~~55,~~120~~845
2012		228,470
2013		234,969
2014		242,205
2015 and thereafter		793,984
	$	1,~~610~~555,~~748~~472

Rent expense plus common area maintenance and related facilities fees for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September, 2011 and 2010 totaled $~~138~~205,~~753~~296 and $~~105~~172,~~623~~491, respectively.

Employment and Consulting Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with certain of its key employees which include non-disclosure and confidentiality provisions for the protection of the Company’s proprietary information.

We entered into employment agreements with Todd Hays and Rodney Hillman effective at the closing of the Transaction and our February 2010 private placement. In addition, we entered into an employment agreement with Richard Leimbach in September 2010 as our Chief Financial Officer. The employment agreements require each of the executives to devote all of their time and attention during normal business hours to our business as our Chief Executive Officer and President, our Chief Operating Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer, respectively. The employment agreements provide that each executive will receive an annual base salary of $175,000, $125,000 and $150,000 per year, respectively, with the annual base salary increasing by 5% on each anniversary date of the employment agreement. In addition, each executive is entitled to (a) receive a cash bonus in an amount determined by the Compensation Committee if we meet or exceed certain mutually agreed upon performance goals and (b) participate in our stock option plan.

On August 29, 2011, the Company entered into an employment separation agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with Richard Leimbach (“Employee”), pursuant to which Employee’s employment as chief financial officer of the Company ended on September 1, 2011 (the “Separation Date”). Employee also agreed to cooperation with the Company, upon the Company’s request, to effect a transition of Employee’s responsibilities, to include, among other things, assisting the Company with its ongoing reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission through the filing date of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

In connection with the Separation Agreement, Employee shall receive the following payments from the Company: (i) a final paycheck for work performed through the Separation Date, (ii) an amount in cash for accrued but unused vacation, sick and personal leave, (iii) severance pay for (26) weeks beginning after the Separation Date and (iv) group insurance (heath, dental, life) equivalent to that provided to all Company senior executives for a period of fifty-two weeks after the Separation Date. Furthermore, as a result of his resignation and the entry into the Separation Agreement, the option to purchase 112,500 shares of the Company’s common stock granted to the Employee will terminate.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect Management's current views with respect to future events and financial performance. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate” and “continue,” or similar words. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of us and members of our management team as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risk and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.

Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes related thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Important factors currently known to Management could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in the future operating results over time except as required by law. We believe that our assumptions are based upon reasonable data derived from and known about our business and operations. No assurances are made that actual results of operations or the results of our future activities will not differ materially from our assumptions. Factors that could cause differences include, but are not limited to, expected market demand for our products, fluctuations in pricing for materials, and competition.

Overview

We are a leading provider of comprehensive trading solutions and services for video game retailers, publishers, rental companies, and consumers. Through our trading platform, we provide our customers with extensive services including valuation, procurement, refurbishment, and merchandising of pre-owned video games. Additionally, through our trading platform, we process and market video game consoles, DVDs, and video game accessories, and provide related e-commerce retailing and interactive marketing services.

On February 25, 2010, we completed a “reverse acquisition” transaction (the “Transaction”), in which we entered into the Exchange Agreement with Gamers and for certain limited purposes, its stockholders. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding securities of Gamers in exchange for the issuance by us of 3,545,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 580,000 shares of our common stock. As a result of the Transaction, Gamers became our wholly-owned subsidiary, with Gamers’ former stockholders acquiring a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

The transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement are being accounted for as a “reverse acquisition,” since the stockholders of Gamers owned a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock immediately following the Transaction. Gamers is deemed to be the acquirer in the Transaction and, consequently, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations that are reflected in the financial statements are those of Gamers and are recorded at the historical cost basis of Gamers. Except for the right of the holders of our series A convertible preferred stock, as a class, to elect one of our directors, no arrangements or understandings exist among present or former controlling stockholders with respect to the election of members of our board of directors and, to our knowledge, no other arrangements exist that might result in a change of control of our company.

In connection with the closing of the Transaction, we completed the closing of a private placement (referred to herein as the “February 2010 private placement”) of $3,900,000 of units (each, a “Unit” and collectively, the “Units”) to purchasers that qualified as “accredited investors”, as defined in Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the terms of a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 25, 2010 (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), with each Unit consisting of one share of our series A convertible preferred stock and a warrant to purchase one share of our common stock. Each share of series A convertible preferred stock has a stated value equal to $2.00 per share and is initially convertible at any time into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to $4.00 per share or an aggregate of 975,000 shares of common stock with respect to all shares of series A convertible preferred stock issued at the closing of our February 2010 private placement, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock (equivalent to 100% warrant coverage in respect of the shares underlying the series A convertible preferred stock) at an exercise price of $5.00 per share through February 25, 2015.

At the closing of our February 2010 private placement, buyers that purchased shares of our series A convertible preferred stock with a stated value of at least $150,000 received a unit purchase option (the “Unit Purchase Option”) to purchase, on the same terms as those Units sold at the closing of our February 2010 private placement, additional Units of series A convertible preferred stock and warrants equal to 50% of the Units they purchased at the closing of our February 2010 private placement. Holders of Unit Purchase Options have exercised Unit Purchase Options to purchase 443,750 Units for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,775,000. The shares of common stock underlying the Units issued upon exercise of the Unit Purchase Options are entitled to the same registration rights as those securities underlying the Units issued at the closing of our February 2010 private placement.

Effective June 30, 2010, the holders of our outstanding shares of series A convertible preferred stock and of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of common stock (collectively, the “Warrants”) issued pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, agreed to amend the terms of the series A convertible preferred stock and Warrants in the following manner:

	•		The parties agreed to add a provision to the certificate of designation for the Series A Preferred Stock whereby the minimum price that the conversion price of the series A convertible preferred stock may be reduced shall be equal to $1.00;

	•		The parties agreed to add a provision to the Warrants whereby the minimum price that the exercise price of the Warrants may be reduced shall be equal to $1.00; and

•

The parties agreed to add a provision to the Securities Purchase Agreement whereby until the 36 month anniversary of the date of the Securities Purchase Agreement, we shall not issue any of our equity securities below $1.00 without the prior written consent of any holder who was issued a Warrant for an aggregate of 2% or more of the Warrants initially issued pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement.

Bank of America Amended and Restated Loan Agreement

On May 4, 2010, Gamers entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Bank. The Loan Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit to Gamers equal to the lesser of (i) $2,500,000 or the sum of (a) 75% of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Loan Agreement) and (b) the lesser of $1,500,000 or 20% of the value of Acceptable Inventory (as defined in the Loan Agreement).

On November 23, 2010, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with the Bank. The Amended and Restated Loan Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit to the Borrower equal to the lesser of (i) $5,000,000 or (ii) the sum of (a) 80% of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement) and (b) the lesser of $1,500,000 or 20% of the value of Acceptable Inventory (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement).

The Company has the right to prepay loans under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement in whole or in part at any time. All amounts borrowed under the Loan Agreement was due on or before May 27, 2011. Loans under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to BBA LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. In connection with the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, as security for any obligation of the Company to Bank under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, the Company and Bank entered into an amended and restated security agreement, dated November 23, 2010 pursuant to which the Company granted Bank a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Company.

On May 12, 2011, the Company entered into the second amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the amended and restated loan agreement, dated November 23, 2010, as amended on January 28, 2011 (the “Amended Loan Agreement”) with Bank. The Second Amendment provides, among other things, that (i) the credit limit (x) is currently $3,858,285 and will increase upon certain events as set forth in the Second Amendment, (ii) the percentage of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Amended Loan Agreement) in calculating the amount available under revolving line of credit to the Company has been reduced from 80% to 75%, (iii) the account balance does not include the amount of any counterclaims or offsets which have been or may be asserted against the Borrower by the account debtor (including offsets for any “contra accounts” owed by the Company to the account debtor for goods purchased by the Company or for services performed for the Borrower, (iv) effective April 1, 2011, the interest rate is a rate per year equal to the BBA LIBOR Daily Floating Rate plus an additional margin of 800 basis points per annum and (v) the expiration date of the line of credit has been extended from May 21, 2011 until August 26, 2011, or such earlier date as provided in the Second Amendment.

On June 24, 2011, the Company received a letter dated June 23, 2011 from Bank pursuant to which the Bank anticipates (and the Company has acknowledged) that the Company will fail to comply with the financial covenants set forth in the Loan Agreement for the period tested as of June 30, 2011 because the Company will not achieve, for the period tested as of June 30, 2011, either the Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) required by Section 8.3 of the Loan Agreement or the Basic Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) required by Section 8.4 of the Loan Agreement. As a result, the Bank informed the Company that this constitutes an event of default under Section 9.14 of the Loan Agreement (the “Existing Default”) and other events of default may also exist and are not waived under the Loan Agreement (together with the Existing Default, the “Events of Default”).

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the balance on the revolver was $31,~~447~~216,~~727~~593.

~~Seasonality~~Critical Accounting Assumptions

~~Our~~Accounts business is seasonal since we rely upon retailers and consumers, with the major portion of our sales and operating profits occurring during the first fiscal quarter following the holiday selling season. Since our supply of video game products depends significantly on consumer trade-ins and returns, there exists significant supply of these items immediately following the holiday season in January through March. Historically, our sales lag the holiday season by one quarter. We have historically generated our highest sales and operating profits during the first quarter of the year.Receivable

~~Results~~The Company extends credit to customers without requiring collateral. The Company uses the allowances method to provide for doubtful accounts based on management’s evaluations of ~~Operations~~the collectability of accounts receivable. Management’s evaluation is based on the Company’s historical collection experience and a review of past-due ~~Three~~amounts. ~~Months~~Management's estimate is subject to fluctuate if factors considered in the evaluation of the outstanding receivable change such as the financial stability a customer or an unforeseen contract dispute. Based on management’s evaluation of collectability, there is a $300,000 and ~~Six~~$100,000 ~~Months~~allowance ~~ended~~for ~~June~~doubtful accounts as of September 30, 2011 ~~compared~~and toDecember ~~the~~31, ~~Three~~2010 ~~and~~respectively. During ~~Six~~the ~~Months~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company wrote off $239,898 and $292,100 respectively as uncollectible accounts receivables. The Company determines accounts receivable to be delinquent when greater than 30 days past due. Accounts receivable are written off when it is determined that amounts are uncollectible.

Inventory

Inventory, consisting of goods held for resale, is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted-average method. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, an allowance for obsolete inventory of $175,000, respectively, was deemed necessary based on management’s estimate of the realizability of the inventory. Management evaluated the inventory based upon a lower of cost or market assessment of inventory values to an anticipated distribution of the primary distribution channels: Retail Ready, Consumer Director, or Bulk. The values of the inventory are subject to change to the extent product demand and market values of the dramatically decrease or the Company reallocates the inventory to a different distribution channel which may result in longer sale lead times, additional refurbishment requirements or extensive price reductions.

Registration Payment Arrangements

The Company accounts for registration payment arrangements under ASC topic 815-40 "Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity" formerly Financial Accounting Standards board (FASB) Staff Position EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements”. ASC topic 815-40 specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments under a registration payment arrangement should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. As of December 31, 2010, the Company accrued an estimated penalty of $380,000 which represents the anticipated penalty due from November 23, 2010 through the Rule 144 restriction period of March 8, 2011. This estimate is subject to increase to the maximum of 12% of the purchase price of the series A convertible preferred stock in the event we do not have a registration statement or Rule 144 eligibility.

Results of Operations - Three Months and Nine Months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2010

The table below outlines revenues and related cost of sales for comparable periods:

	Three months ended June 30,
	Three months ended September 30,
	2011						2010					Variance
Revenue		$	7,067,397		100	%		$	6,507,951	100	%		$	559,446		9	%
Net Sales		$	8,029,802		100	%		$	8,005,366	100	%		$	24,436		0	%
Cost of Sales			127,~~914~~291,~~893~~172		~~182~~91	%			57,~~452~~927,~~880~~525	8499	%			7(636,~~462,013~~353	)	~~136~~-8	%
Gross Profit		$	(5738,~~847,496~~630	)	~~-82~~9	%		$	177,~~055,071~~841	161	%		$	(6660,~~902,567~~789	)	~~-654~~849	%

	Six months ended June 30,
	Nine months ended September 30,
	2011						2010					Variance
Net Sales		$	1624,~~219~~249,~~519~~321		100	%		$	1826,~~033~~038,~~238~~605	100	%		$	(1,~~813~~789,~~719~~284	)	-107	%
Cost of Sales			2129,~~715~~006,~~277~~449		~~134~~120	%			1523,~~374~~301,~~233~~759	8590	%			65,~~341~~704,~~044~~690		4125	%
Gross Profit		$	(54,~~495~~757,~~758~~128	)	-3420	%		$	2,~~659~~736,~~005~~846	1510	%		$	(87,~~154~~493,~~763~~974	)	-~~306~~273	%

Net Sales . We had an increase in ~~Net~~net ~~Sales~~sales of $~~559~~24,~~446~~436, or 9-0% and a decrease in ~~revenue~~net sales of $1,~~813~~789,~~719~~284, or -107% during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. The decrease for the ~~six~~three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 was due primarily to constrained working capital and product financing availability.

Cost of Sales . During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we had ana ~~increase~~decrease in cost of sales of $7636,~~462~~353,~~013,~~ or ~~136~~8%, and an increase of $65,~~341~~704,~~044~~690, or 4125%, respectively, compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. Our increase in Cost of Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is primarily due to $6,000,000 inventory valuation write-off of our inventory attributable to future demand and market conditions and due to a liquidation of inventory to satisfy our asset based lender's loan repayment requirements ~~on or before August 26, 2011~~. Furthermore, the ~~decrease~~increase in cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is also attributable to an increase in per unit average product and labor costs compared to the prior period.

Gross Profit. Gross profit ~~decreased~~increased by $6660,~~902~~789,~~567,~~ or ~~-654~~849% , and decreased by $87,~~154~~493,~~763~~974, or -~~306~~273%, for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, when compared to the three and ~~six~~nine month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. The decrease during the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 was primarily a resulting of the inventory valuation write-off in the ~~current~~second quarter. Furthermore, the decrease in gross profit margin, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, is attributable to an unanticipated higher per unit labor requirement to service the Retail Ready programs and a more selective product requirement for our bulk sales and costs associated with obtaining special credit terms with certain vendors and product financing arrangements.

Operating Expense. Operating expenses, which consist of sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative costs, stock based compensation and depreciation totaled $1,~~817~~641,~~704~~795 and $34,~~247~~889,~~435~~229 during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively as compared to $1,~~677~~434,~~788~~442 and $46,~~902~~336,~~277~~720 during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively. The operating expenses for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 increased by $~~139~~207,~~916~~353 and decreased by $1,~~654~~447,~~842~~491, respectively, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. The major component of these expenses between the corresponding ~~six~~nine month periods was the decrease in financing and merger transaction costs of $~~114~~590,~~660 and $551,014~~ 957 for ~~the~~nine ~~three and six~~ months comparable periods and the prior year period non-employee stock based compensation of $1,579,689 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A). The SG&A expenses consist of salaries, advertising, professional service fees, investor relations services and overhead expenses, totaled $1,~~318~~136,~~495~~316 and $23,~~347~~484,~~920~~235 during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to $1957,~~278,620~~656 and $23,~~613~~570,~~323~~980 during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, respectively. SG&A increased by $39178,~~875~~660 and decreased $~~265~~86,~~403~~745 between the corresponding ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months periods, respectively. The decrease between the corresponding three and ~~six~~nine month periods is primarily attributable to financing and merger transaction costs of $~~114~~590,~~660 and $551,014~~957.

Stock Based Compensation . During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, the employee stock based compensation expense was $~~392~~358,~~261~~990 and $~~769~~1,~~812~~128,802 and $~~387~~452,~~933~~285 and $~~673~~1,~~966~~126,251, respectively, from issuances of employee incentive stock options. The incentive stock options were valued using the Black Scholes method and the option shall become exercisable during the term of recipient’s employment.

Non-Employee Stock Based Compensation . For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, the non-cash non-employee stock based compensation expense was $80120,~~320~~480 and $200,800 and $0 and $1,579,689 ~~noncash~~which ~~charges~~ were due to the issuance of 300,000 stock warrants in exchange for private placement referral in April 2011 and professional services associated with reverse merger and private placement consummated in February 2010, respectively. The value of the warrants was determined using the Black Scholes method, the details of which are more fully explained within the notes to the financial statements.

Product Financing Liquidated Damages . In accordance with the agreement (the “DK Trading Sales Agreement”), dated July 22, 2010, between Gamers and DK Trading Partners LLC ( “DK Trading”), to the extent we are delinquent in paying DK Trading any such amounts to which it is entitled under the DK Trading Sales Agreement, we are obligated to pay liquidated damages to DK Trading, for each day that we are delinquent in our payment obligations, in an amount equal to 0.25% of the amount not paid to DK Trading when due. The balance due to DK Trading at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 amounted to $1838,~~054~~938,~~403,~~ including $~~629~~704,~~841~~376 of accumulated liquidated damages for delinquent payments. The Product Financing Liquidated Damages amounted to $~~113~~74,~~200~~535 and $~~323~~398,~~841~~190 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, respectively . Further description of DK Trading Sales Agreement detailed in "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section and "Product Financing-Related Parties" in Note 4.

Registration Rights Liquidated Damages. The registration rights agreement we entered into in connection with the February 2010 private placement requires the payment of liquidated damages to the investors of approximately 2% per month of the aggregate proceeds of $5,675,000 or the value of the unregistered shares at the time that the liquidated damages are assessed, until the registration statement is declared effective, payable at the option of the Company. On October 22, 2010, the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series A Warranted issued in our February 2010 private placement agreed to waive any liquidated damages payable as a result of the failure to have a registration statement declared effective by October 23, 2010 until November 23, 2010. In accordance with ASC topic 815-40 "Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity's Own Equity" formerly Financial Accounting Standards board (FASB) Staff Position EITF 00-19-2, “Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements”, the Company evaluated the likelihood of achieving registration statement effectiveness. Accordingly, the Company previously accrued an estimate of $380,000 and as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, to account for these liquidated damages from November 23, 2010 through the Rule 144 restriction period of March 8, 2011.

Provision for Income Taxes. We are not been required to pay income taxes due to current year losses and net operating loss carryforwards from prior years.

Net Income (Loss). We had a net loss of ($71,~~859~~008,~~855~~955) and ($910,~~179~~188,~~440~~394) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 as compared to a net loss of ($~~641~~1,~~050~~379,807) and ($23,~~280~~659,~~047~~854) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. The ~~current~~nine month period loss is primarily attributable to the valuation write-off of the inventory of $6,000,000 due to the liquidation of inventory to meet debt obligations in the third quarter 2011.

Seasonality

Our business is seasonal since we rely upon retailers and consumers, with the major portion of our sales and operating profits occurring during the first fiscal quarter following the holiday selling season. Since our supply of video game products depends significantly on consumer trade-ins and returns, there exists significant supply of these items immediately following the holiday season in January through March. Historically, our sales lag the holiday season by one quarter. We have historically generated our highest sales and operating profits during the first quarter of the year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have financed our operations since inception primarily through private and public offerings of our equity securities and the issuance of various debt instruments and asset based lending.

Working Capital

Our working capital decreased by $8,~~235~~859,~~209~~164 during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 from a working capital surplus of $1,646,843 at December 31, 2010 to a working capital deficit of $67,~~588~~212,~~366~~321 at ~~June~~September 30, 2011.

The major changes in the working capital for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 are as follows:

Changes in Current Assets

	•		Accounts receivable increased in the amount of $ 1,~~140~~695,~~512~~264 excluding an increase in allowance for doubtful accounts of $200,000
	•		Inventory decreased $47,~~757~~841,~~049~~514 attributable to the non-cash inventory valuation write-off of $6,000,000 offset by $1,~~242~~841,~~951~~514 for purchases of inventory

Change in Current Liabilities

• Accounts payable increased in the amount of $4,~~733~~475,~~924~~532

• A decrease in Product Financing - related party advances of $~~735~~1,~~159~~348,814

	•		An increase in Product Financing of $2,~~199~~392,~~483~~532 offset by Restricted Cash of $~~791~~1,~~171~~177,440
	•		A decrease in the Bank of America working line of credit of $~~640~~2,~~558~~871,692

Of the total current assets of $107,~~863~~688,~~255~~551 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, cash represented $~~947~~338,~~797~~369. Of the total current assets of $13,374,054 as of December 31, 2010, cash represented $827,526.

Working Capital Line of Credit

On May 4, 2010, Gamers entered into a Loan Agreement with Bank . The Loan Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit to Gamers equal to the lesser of (i) $5,000,000 or the sum of (a) 75% of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Loan Agreement) and (b) the lesser of $1,500,000 or 20% of the value of Acceptable Inventory (as defined in the Loan Agreement).

On November 23, 2010, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with the Bank. The Amended and Restated Loan Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit to the Borrower equal to the lesser of (i) $5,000,000 or (ii) the sum of (a) 80% of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement) and (b) the lesser of $1,500,000 or 20% of the value of Acceptable Inventory (as defined in the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement).

The Company has the right to prepay loans under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement in whole or in part at any time. All amounts borrowed under the Loan Agreement was due on or before May 27, 2011. Loans under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to BBA LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. In connection with the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, as security for any obligation of the Company to Bank under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, the Company and Bank entered into an amended and restated security agreement, dated November 23, 2010 pursuant to which the Company granted Bank a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Company.

On May 12, 2011, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to the amended and restated loan agreement, dated November 23, 2010, as amended on January 28, 2011 (the “Amended Loan Agreement”) with Bank. The Second Amendment provides, among other things, that (i) the credit limit (x) is currently $3,858,285 and will increase upon certain events as set forth in the Second Amendment, (ii) the percentage of the balance due on Acceptable Receivables (as defined in the Amended Loan Agreement) in calculating the amount available under revolving line of credit to the Company has been reduced from 80% to 75%, (iii) the account balance does not include the amount of any counterclaims or offsets which have been or may be asserted against the Borrower by the account debtor (including offsets for any “contra accounts” owed by the Company to the account debtor for goods purchased by the Company or for services performed for the Borrower, (iv) effective April 1, 2011, the interest rate is a rate per year equal to the BBA LIBOR Daily Floating Rate plus an additional margin of 800 basis points per annum and (v) the expiration date of the line of credit has been extended from May 21, 2011 until August 26, 2011, or such earlier date as provided in the Second Amendment.

On June 24, 2011, the Company received a letter dated June 23, 2011 from Bank pursuant to which the Bank anticipates (and the Company has acknowledged) that the Company will fail to comply with the financial covenants set forth in the Loan Agreement for the period tested as of June 30, 2011 because the Company ~~will~~would not achieve, for the period tested as of June 30, 2011, either the Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) required by Section 8.3 of the Loan Agreement or the Basic Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) required by Section 8.4 of the Loan Agreement. As a result, the Bank informed the Company that this constitutes an event of default under Section 9.14 of the Loan Agreement (the “Existing Default”) and other events of default may also exist and are not waived under the Loan Agreement (together with the Existing Default, the “Events of Default”).

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the balance on the revolver was $31,~~447~~216,~~727~~593.

Product Financing

On April 15, 2011, the Company entered into a Sales Agency and Purchasing/Sales Services Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Gamers Finance, LLC (“Gamers Finance”) pursuant to which Gamers Finance engaged the Company to procure, purchase and sell up pre-owned video games and associated packaging materials, together with such other merchandise as designated by Gamers Finance, on behalf of Gamers Finance for a period from April 15, 2011 until October 15, 2011. In consideration for the services to be performed by the Company under the Sales Agreement, the Company is entitled to receive 70% of the aggregate net profit, if any, from the sale of products procured by Gamers Finance with the assistance of the Company. The aggregate net profits is defined as gross revenue net of i) applicable sales taxes ii) sales expenses iii) all discounts, allowances and credits, less the sum of (1) aggregate purchase price of products (2) all shipping and delivery costs and (3) a capital charge of 0.115% per day of the Term of all Committed Capital. If the Company consummates an equity or equity-linked financing pursuant to which the Company raises aggregate gross proceeds of at least $6,000,000, Gamers Finance shall have the right to transfer, assign and sell to the Company (i) any outstanding receivables for the face value of such receivables or (ii) products not sold to any purchasers for the purchase price of such products plus 10%. In addition, to the extent we are delinquent in paying Gamers Finance any such amounts to which it is entitled under the Sales Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay liquidated damages to Gamers Finance, for each day that the Company is delinquent in its payment obligations, in an amount equal to 0.25% of the amount not paid to Gamers Finance when due. Furthermore, Mr. Hays, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer provided a personal guaranty in favor of Gamers Finance through the agreement period October 15, 2011. The Company has product advances of approximately $2,042,687 from Gamers Finance as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 including accrued gross profit allocation of $68161,~~383~~441 and accrued capital charge of $~~131~~231,~~100~~091. Gamers Finance maintains a restricted cash account for unexpended Committed Capital for future purchases. The restricted cash balance as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 amounted to $~~791~~1,~~171~~177,440.

Product Financing - Related Party

On July 22, 2010, Gamers entered into a DK Trading Sales Agreement with DK Trading pursuant to which DK Trading engaged Gamers to procure, purchase and sell up to $3,000,000 of pre-owned video games and associated packaging materials, together with such other merchandise as designated by DK Trading, on behalf of DK Trading for a period from August 13, 2010 until September 15, 2010. In consideration for the services to be performed by Gamers under the Sales Agreement, Gamers is entitled to receive 100% of the net profit, if any, from the sale of products procured by DK Trading with the assistance of Gamers in excess of $600,000. If we or Gamers consummate an equity or equity-linked financing pursuant to which we raise aggregate gross proceeds of at least $3,000,000, DK Trading shall have the right to transfer, assign and sell to Gamers (i) any outstanding receivables for the face value of such receivables or (ii) products not sold to any purchasers for the purchase price of such products plus 20%. In addition, to the extent we are delinquent in paying DK Trading any such amounts to which it is entitled under the Sales Agreement, we are obligated to pay a fee to DK Trading, for each day that we are delinquent in our payment obligations, in an amount equal to 0.25% of the amount not paid to DK Trading when due. The balance due to DK Trading at ~~June~~September 30, 2011 amounted to $1838,~~054,403~~938 including $~~629~~704,~~841~~376 accumulated liquidated damages for delinquent payments.

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, the Company did not receive any proceeds from the issuance of its common stock.

Cashflow analysis

Cash proceeds provided by operations was $~~743~~3,~~180~~005,546 during the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and cash used in operations was $48,~~792~~361,~~817~~469 during the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010. During the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, our primary capital needs were for working capital necessary to fund operations and inventory purchases.

We utilized cash for investing activities of $49,050 and $~~268~~280,~~615~~315 during the periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. This increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of equipment.

Cash used in financing activities of $~~573~~3,~~859~~445,653 during the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2011, compared to cash provided from financing activities was $48,~~579~~411,~~305~~698 during the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010. The current period decrease is due to repayment from the line of credit of $~~640~~526,~~558~~254 and net advances from product financing arrangements of $2,000,000 offset by $~~791~~1,~~171~~177,440 held in Restricted Cash and related party product financing repayments of $1,~~059~~348,~~000~~814 and dividend payments of $66,875. The prior year increase is primarily attributable to funds received from the February 2010 Series A preferred private placements of $5,675,000, note payable repayments to a related party of $~~390~~392,~~022~~169 and proceeds from working capital line of credit of $2,~~063~~363,285. The prior year financing activities also included repayments of certain notes payable of $2,750,000 during the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

We have continued to incur operating losses in the current year and to date have been unsuccessful in raising additional working capital and that we are dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations. These factors among others may raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We believe that we will require additional financing to carry out our intended objectives during the next twelve months. There can be no assurance, however, that such financing will be available or, if it is available, that we will be able to structure such financing on terms acceptable to us and that it will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements until we can reach a level of profitable operations and positive cash flows. If we are unable to obtain the financing necessary to support our operations, we may be unable to continue as a going concern. We currently have no firm commitments for any additional capital.

The downturn in the United States stock and debt markets could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our shares of common stock. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.

Off-Balance Sheet ~~Arrangements~~Arrangement

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

None.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Rule 13a-15(e)) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011. Management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 because of the items set forth below:

●	The Company did not have sufficient oversight to ensure financial reporting, proper disclosures around related-party transactions or dissemination of the Company’s policies and procedures.

●	The Company did not maintain effective controls over the period-end financial reporting process, including controls and supporting documentation with respect to journal entries, account reconciliations and proper segregation of duties.

●	The Company did not implement proper segregation of duties. In certain instances, persons responsible to review transactions for validity, completeness and accuracy were also responsible for preparation.

●	The Company’s stock option vesting determination was inaccurately established in February 2010 and warrant and stock option methodology was inconsistent with guidance.

●	The Company did not maintain effective controls within the inventory function, including purchasing, receiving, returns, physical inventory and obsolescence analysis.

●

The Company did not develop and maintain effective general computer controls, including use of a financial application and inventory management system that lack sufficient internal controls, ensuring proper security access within the financial and inventory management applications, ensuring proper change management procedures were followed, and ensuring adequate information technology procedures were followed in accordance with generally accepted best practices.

●

The Company failed to maintain effective controls within the revenue function, including monitoring major sales contracts to ensure revenue recognition criteria were identified and properly monitored to ensure revenue was recognized, inventory was relieved, and accounts receivable and cost of goods sold were recorded in the correct period.

MANAGEMENT’S REMEDIATION PLAN

Based on the control deficiencies identified above, we have designed and plan to implement, or in some cases have already implemented, the specific remediation initiatives described below:

●

Prior to filing this report, we designed and are implementing robust corporate governance including: (1) direct oversight of our internal controls by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors; (2) detailed review of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors; (3) adoption and communication of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; (4) adoption and communication of our Policy on Insider Trading; (5) revision of policies within our employee handbook to ensure that appropriate disciplinary actions may be taken in the event an employee fails to properly perform their responsible internal controls or intentionally overrides any internal control and completion of employee training on the policy revisions; (6) adoption of charters for our Audit, Compensation, Governance and Nominating Committees of our Board of Directors; (7) adoption of our Whistleblower Policy, which includes our anonymous reporting system; and (8) adoption of our policy on reporting and investigating complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

● In September 2010, we hired a Chief Financial Officer with considerable public company reporting experience who is evaluating the depth and breadth of knowledge of US GAAP and external reporting requirements among the current members of the accounting staff. We are committed to establishing procedures and utilizing experienced individuals with professional supervision to properly segregate duties, prepare and approve the consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures in accordance with US GAAP.

On August 29, 2011, the Company entered into an employment separation agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with Richard Leimbach (“Employee”), pursuant to which Employee’s employment as Chief Financial Officer of the Company ended on September 1, 2011 (the “Separation Date”). Employee also agreed to cooperation with the Company, upon the Company’s request, to effect a transition of Employee’s responsibilities, to include, among other things, assisting the Company with its ongoing reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission through the filing date of the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

●

Prior to filing this report, we improved our financial reporting and inventory and revenue procedures in financial reporting and in inventory and in revenue cycles and continue to implement fundamental controls aligned with our business strategy. There is a specific focus on customer contracts, revenue recognition and enhancing 3rd party shipper reporting requirements.

●	Prior to filing this report, we enhanced our stock option and warrant valuation procedures to incorporate a comparative analysis of firms similar to ours that have significant stock trading history.

●	The Board of Directors is more actively involved in providing additional oversight of the Company’s internal controls, formal review of our financial statements, and more detailed review of the draft periodic reports we anticipate filing with the SEC.

●

We have initiated efforts to ensure our employees understand the importance of internal controls and compliance with corporate policies and procedures. We will implement a reporting and certification process for management involved in the performance of internal controls and preparation of the Company’s financial statements.

●	We will design and implement a formalized financial reporting process that includes balance sheet reconciliations, properly prepared, supported and reviewed journal entries, properly segregated duties, and properly completed and approved close checklist and calendar.

● We will initiate a formal feasibility assessment for implementing a compliant ERP system to replace our current financial software application and inventory management system during our current fiscal year. As part of this assessment, we will thoroughly review the roles and responsibilities of our staff involved in the performance of our financial close process and other internal controls to ensure duties are properly segregated, access rights within our new financial software application comply with designated roles and responsibilities and support the proper segregation of duties.

●	The Company may retain third party specialists to assist us in the design, implementation and testing of our internal controls as necessary.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect such controls.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

We are not party to any legal proceedings, nor are we aware of any contemplated or pending legal proceedings against us.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On April 15, 2011, we issued a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock (the "Warrant") to North Mohawk Capital LLC for financial advisor services in conjunction with a product financing agreement. The Warrant is exercisable for a period of 5 years from the date of issuance at an initial exercise price of $4. The consultant may exercise the Warrant on a cashless basis. In the event the consultant exercise the Warrant on a cashless basis, then we will not receive any proceeds. The warrant was issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

On June 24, 2011, the Company received a letter dated June 23, 2011 from Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank”), pursuant to which the Bank anticipates (and the Company has acknowledged) that the Company will fail to comply with the financial covenants set forth in the Loan Agreement for the period tested as of June 30, 2011 because the Company would not achieve, for the period tested as of June 30, 2011, either the Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) required by Section 8.3 of the Loan Agreement or the Basic Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement) required by Section 8.4 of the Loan Agreement. As a result, the Bank informed the Company that this constitutes an event of default under Section 9.14 of the Loan Agreement (the “Existing Default”) and other events of default may also exist and are not waived under the Loan Agreement (together with the Existing Default, the “Events of Default”).

As a result of the occurrence of the Events of Default, the Bank stopped making any additional credit available to the Company and will not make any additional advances under the Line of Credit. All availability under the Line of Credit was terminated and the Bank reserved its right to collect any applicable default rate of interest, as provided under the Loan Agreement. In addition, the Company will continue to incur fees and costs in connection with the Events of Default and the Line of Credit, all of which shall be the Company's responsibility. Furthermore, the Bank specifically reserved the right under the Loan Agreement, from time to time without notice, to declare any and all Obligations to be immediately due and payable.

Item 4.

Removed and Reserved

Item 5.

Other Information

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

Number		Description
31.1		Certification as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by ~~Chief~~Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer.
31.2		Certification as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer.
32.1		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer.
32.2		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.

EX-101.INS		Xbrl Instance Document*
EX-101.SCH		Xbrl Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
EX-101.CAL		Xbrl Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
EX-101.DEF		Xbrl Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
EX-101.LAB		Xbrl Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document*
EX-101.PRE		Xbrl Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*

* The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	GAME TRADING TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Date: August 19, 2011	By:	/s/ Todd Hays
Date: November 21, 2011	By:	/s/ Todd Hays
		Todd Hays
		Chief Executive Officer

Filing Compare · Game Trading Technologies, Inc.