UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
x	Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2009
	For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2009
[ ]	Transition Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
o	Transition Report pursuant to 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the transition period ___________ to __________

Commission File Number: 000-31042

UNoble ~~S Canadian Minerals~~Consolidated ~~Inc~~Industries Corp

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	33-0843633
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

~~161-936~~1280 ~~Peace~~Alexandria ~~Portal~~Court, ~~Drive~~McCarran, ~~Blaine~~Nevada ~~Washington~~89434 ~~98230~~ (Address of principal executive offices)

~~702~~775-~~357~~343-~~8722~~1000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) ~~_______________________________________________________________~~U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. 161-939 Peace Portal Drive Blaine, Washington 98230 (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days ~~[X]~~ x Yes ~~[ ]~~ o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” and “a smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [o ] Accelerated filer [o ] Non-accelerated filer [o ] Smaller reporting company ~~[ X ]~~x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ~~[ ]~~o Yes ~~[X]~~ x No

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~number~~registrant ofhas ~~shares~~submitted ~~outstanding~~electronically ofand ~~each~~posted ofon its ~~the~~corporate ~~issuer’s~~Web ~~classes~~site, ofif ~~common stock~~any, asevery Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the ~~latest~~preceding ~~practicable~~12 ~~date:~~months ~~7,417,203~~(or ~~common~~for ~~shares~~such ~~and~~shorter period that the ~~129,699~~registrant ~~Preferred~~was ~~“A”~~required ~~shares~~to assubmit ofand ~~June~~post ~~30,~~such ~~2009~~files). Yes ¨ No ¨

~~Table~~Indicate the number of ~~Contents~~shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 60,017,464 common shares and 600 Preferred “A” shares as of September 30, 2009.

	TABLE OF CONTENTS	~~Page~~
		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3F-1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	94
Item 8a.	Controls and Procedures	10
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	124
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	124
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	134
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	135
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	135
Item 5.	Other Information	135
Item 6.	Exhibits	146

- 2 -

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are as follows:
F-1	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009;
F-2	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, for the three months ending June 30, 2009 and the three months ending June 30, 2008, and from inception on January 9, 2001 to June 30, 2009;
F-3	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and from inception on January 9, 2001 to June 30, 2009;
F-4	Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity from inception on January 9, 2001 to June 30, 2009;
F-5	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements;

Our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are as follows:

These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the SEC instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the full year.

F-2	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009 and audited Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008;

F-3	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, for the nine months ending September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, and from reclassification as an exploration stage company on January 9, 2004 to September 30, 2009;

F-4	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and from reclassification as an exploration stage company on January 9, 2004 to September 30, 2009;

F-5	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

-These unaudited 3consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the SEC instructions to Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the full year.

~~Table of Contents~~F-1

U.S. CANADIAN MINERALS, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
ASSETS
	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	1,149		$	2,032
Prepaid expenses		9,500			-
Total Current Assets		10,649			2,032
OTHER ASSETS
Mineral properties		1,661,253			1,661,253
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,671,902		$	1,663,285
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	1,274,315		$	862,034
Due to related parties		72,366			22,366
Total Current Liabilities		1,346,681			884,400
LONG TERM LIABILITIES
Due to related parties - long term		-			-
Total Liabilities		1,346,681			884,400
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock - Series A; $0.001 par value;
1,000,000 shares authorized;129,849 shares
issued and outstanding		130			130
Common stock - Series A; $0.001 par value;
200,000,000 shares authorized; 5,322,026 shares
shares issued and outstanding, respectively		7,417			5,322
Treasury stock		1,000			1,000
Additional paid-in capital		23,022,869			22,919,964
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(22,706,195	)		(22,147,531	)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		325,221			778,885
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	1,671,902		$	1,663,285
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

NOBLE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES CORP (fka U.S. Canadian Minerals)

~~F -~~(A 1Development Stage Company)

~~Table~~(Unaudited) ofBalance ~~Contents~~Sheets

U.S. CANADIAN MINERALS, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
													From Inception
													on January 1,
	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended						2004 Through
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009
REVENUES	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	3,000		$	136,524
COST OF REVENUES		-			-			-			-			12,778
GROSS MARGIN		-			-			-			3,000			123,746
OPERATING EXPENSES
General and administrative		287,273			403,579			558,664			511,801			8,943,294
Total Operating Expenses		287,273			403,579			558,664			511,801			8,943,294
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(287,273	)		(403,579	)		(558,664	)		(508,801	)		(8,819,548	)
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE)
Interest expense		-			(1,771	)		-			(2,184	)		(250,303	)
Gain on sale of assets		-			-			-			-			256,873
Total Other Income (Expense)		-			(1,771	)		-			(2,184	)		6,570
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(287,273	)		(405,350	)		(558,664	)		(510,985	)		(8,812,978	)
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		-			-			-			-			(537,986	)
NET LOSS	$	(287,273	)	$	(405,350	)	$	(558,664	)	$	(510,985	)	$	(9,350,964	)
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE
Continuing Operations	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.13	)
Discontinued Operations	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER
OF SHARES OUTSTANDING		6,369,615			4,546,879			6,020,418			4,029,679
The accompanying notes are a integral part of these financials statements.

ASSETS

F - 2

	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	4,215		$	2,032
Prepaid expenses		9,500			-
Total Current Assets		13,715			2,032

NET FIXED ASSETS		1,089,200			-

OTHER ASSETS
Other receivables		10,000			-
Mineral properties		1,661,253			-
Total Other Assets		1,671,253			-

TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,774,168		$	2,032

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	631,073		$	862,034
Short Term Loan		200,500			-
Due to related parties		72,366			22,366

Total Current Liabilities		903,939			884,400

LONG TERM LIABILITIES

Due to related parties – long term		-			-

Total Liabilities		903,939			884,400

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Preferred stock – Series A; $0.001 par value;
1,000,000 shares authorized; 600 shares issued and outstanding		130			130
Common stock – Series A; $0.001 par value;
200,000,000 shares authorized; 60,017,464 shares
shares issued and outstanding. respectively		7,817			5,322
Treasury stock		1,000			1,000
Additional paid-in capital		24,396,469			22,919,964
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(22,535,187	)		(23,808,784	)

Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		1,870,229			(882,368	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	2,774,168		$	2,032

Table of Contents

U.S. CANADIAN MINERALS, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
(Unaudited)
							Additional
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Paid-In		Treasury		Accumulated
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Capital		Stock		Deficit		Total
Balance at January 1, 2004	477,500	$	477	26,709	$	27	$	13,809,334	$	-	$	(15,016,484)	$	(1,206,646)
Issuance of preferred shares
for services	114,000		114	-		-		57,342		-		-		57,456
Issuance of common shares
for services	-		-	56,776		57		1,584,440		-		-		1,584,497
Issuance of common shares for
conversion of preferred shares	(254,050)		(254)	259,700		260		7,543		-		-		7,549
Cancellation of shares	(140,000)		(140)	(1,890)		(2)		142		-		-		-
Issuance of preferred stock
for acquisition of mineral rights	330,000		330	-		-		(156,746)		-		-		(156,416)
Fractional shares issued	-		-	12		-		1,038		-		-		1,038
Issuance of common stock for cash	-		-	185,550		186		3,283,515		-		-		3,283,701
Issuance of common shares
for acquisition of mineral rights	-		-	841,249		841		3,140,946		1,000		-		3,142,787
Netloss for the year ended
through December 31, 2004	-		-	-		-		-		-		(3,565,085)		(3,565,085)
Balance, December 31, 2004	527,450		527	1,368,106		1,369		21,727,554		1,000		(18,581,569)		3,148,881
Fractional shares issued	-		-	1,078		1		(1)		-		-		-
Issuance of common shares for
conversion of preferred shares	(301,700)		(301)	609,400		609		(308)		-		-		-
Recission of common stock	-		-	(17,000)		(17)		(879,483)		-		-		(879,500)
Issuance of common stock
for services	-		-	1,000		1		40,499		-		-		40,500
Issuance of common stock for cash	-		-	86,251		86		921,215		-		-		921,301
Issuance of common shares
for acquisition of mineral rights	-		-	2,791		3		44,997		-		-		45,000
Recission of common stock				(16,560)		(17)		(811)		-		-		(828)
Net loss for the year
ended December 31, 2005	-		-	-		-		-		-		(990,715)		(990,715)
Balance, January 1, 2006	225,750		226	2,035,066		2,035		21,853,662		1,000		(19,572,284)		2,284,639
Issuance of common stock for cash	-		-	10,000		10		19,990		-		-		20,000
Issuance of common stock for cash	-		-	6,400		6		14,994		-		-		15,000
Issuance of common shares for
conversion of preferred shares	(121,515)		(121)	24,303		24		97		-		-		0
Issuance of common shares
for services	-		-	40,000		40		99,960		-		-		100,000
Issuance of common stock for cash	-		-	33,333		33		59,967		-		-		60,000
Issuance of prefered stock
for services	40,000		40	-		-		-		-		-		40
Issuance of prefered stock
for services	40,000		40	-		-		-		-		-		40
Net loss for the year
ended December 31, 2006	-		-	-		-		-		-		(810,695)		(810,695)
Balance, December 31, 2006	184,235		185	2,149,102		2,149		22,048,670		1,000		(20,382,979)		1,669,025
Cancellation of common shares
issued for services	-		-	(12,559)		(13)		13		-		-		-
Issuance of prefered stock
for services	9,333		9	-		-		-		-		-		9
Issuance of common stock
for services	-		-	6,783		7		9,302		-		-		9,309
Issuance of prefered stock
for services	16,666		17	-		-		-		-		-		17
Recission of common stock	-		-	(780,010)		(780)		780		-		-		-
Issuance of common stock
bonus for recession of
Nevada minerals stock	-		-	78,008		78		205,409		-		-		205,487
Issuance of common stock
for services	-		-	40,000		40		109,175		-		-		109,215
Issuance of common shares for
conversion of preferred shares	(79,885)		(80)	83,500		84		(4)		-		-		-
Issuance of common stock
for services	-		-	53,103		53		13,222		-		-		13,275
Issuance of common stock
stock based compensation	-		-	689,655		690		143,624		-		-		144,314
Issuance of common stock
stock based compensation	-		-	689,655		690		143,624		-		-		144,314
Issuance of common shares for
conversion of preferred shares	(500)		(1)	1,000		1		(1)		-		-		-
Fractional shares issued	-		-	8,291		8		(8)		-		-		-
Net loss for the year
ended December 31, 2007	-		-	-		-		-		-		(651,143)		(651,143)
Balance, December 31, 2007	129,849	$	130	3,006,528	$	3,006	$	22,673,806	$	1,000	$	(21,034,122)	$	1,643,821
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F - 3

Table of Contents

U.S. CANADIAN MINERALS, INC.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
(Unaudited)
							Additional
	Preferred Stock			Common Stock			Paid-In		Treasury		Accumulated
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Capital		Stock		Deficit		Total
Balance, December 31, 2007	129,849	$	130	3,006,528	$	3,006	$	22,673,806	$	1,000	$	(21,034,122)	$	1,643,820
Issuance of common shares for
conversion of preferred shares	(15,516)		(15)	1,551,600		1,552		(1,537)		-		-		-
Issuance of common stock
for services	-		-	231,598		232		44,775		-		-		45,007
Issuance of preferred shares
for services	20,000		20	-		-		199,980		-		-		200,000
Issuance of common stock for cash	-		-	68,900		69		3,398		-		-		3,467
Issuance of common shares for
conversion of preferred shares	(4,634)		(5)	463,400		463		(458)		-		-		-
Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2008	-		-	-		-		-		-		(1,113,409)		(1,113,409)
Balance, December 31, 2008	129,699		130	5,322,026		5,322		22,919,964		1,000		(22,147,531)		778,885
Issuance of common stock for debt
and services at $0.05 per share	-		-	2,095,177		2,095		102,905		-		-		105,000
Net loss for the six months ended
June 30, 2009	-		-	-		-		-		-		(558,664)		(558,664)
Balance, June 30, 2009	129,699	$	130	7,417,203	$	7,417	$	23,022,869	$	1,000	$	(22,706,195)	$	325,221

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F - 42

~~Table~~NOBLE ofCONSOLIDATED ~~Contents~~INDUSTRIES CORP (fka U.S. Canadian Minerals)

~~U.S.~~(A ~~CANADIAN~~Development ~~MINERALS,~~Stage ~~INC.~~Company)

~~(An~~Statements ~~Exploration~~of ~~Stage Company)~~Operations

~~Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements~~(Unaudited)

June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						From Inception on January 1, 2004 Through September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009
REVENUES	$	-		$	3,000		$	-		$	-		$	136,524
COST OF REVENUES		-			-			-			-			12,778
GROSS MARGIN		-			3,000			-			-			123,746

OPERATING EXPENSES

General and administrative		896,246			715,807			329,737			204,006			9,280,876

Total Operating Expenses		896,246			715,807			329,737			204,006			9,280,876

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(896,246	)		(712,807	)		(329,737	)		(204,006	)		(9,157,130	)

OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE)

Interest expense		-			(3,664	)		-			(1,480	)		(250,303	)
Gain on sale of assets		-			-			-			-			256,873

Total Other Income (Expense)		-			(3,664	)		-			(1,480	)		6,570

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		(896,246	)		(716,471	)		(329,737	)		(205,486	)		(9,150,560	)

LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS		-			-			-			-			(537,986	)

NET LOSS	$	(896,246	)	$	(716,471	)	$	(329,737	)	$	(205,486	)	$	(9,688,546	)

BASIC LOSS PER SHARE
Continuing Operations	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.04	)
Discontinued Operations	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING		17,179,823			4,289,554			17,179,823			4,808,029

~~NOTE~~The 1accompanying -notes ~~CONDENSED~~are ~~FINANCIAL~~an ~~STATEMENTS~~integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows at June 30, 2009, and for all periods presented herein, have been made.F-3

~~Certain~~NOBLE ~~information~~CONSOLIDATED ~~and~~INDUSTRIES ~~footnote~~CORP ~~disclosures~~(fka ~~normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted~~U. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's December 31, 2008 audited financial statementsS. ~~The results~~ ofCanadian ~~operations for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full years.~~Minerals)

~~NOTE~~(A 2Development -Stage ~~GOING CONCERN~~Company)

~~The~~Statements ~~Company's financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States~~ of ~~America~~Cash applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.Flows

(Unaudited)

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						From Inception on January 1, 2004 Through September 30,
	2009			2008			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(896,246	)	$	(716,471	)	$	(9,094,494	)
Discontinued operations		-			-			(1,265,877	)
Adjustment to accrued expenses		407,525			-			407,525
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Stock issued for services		-			21			1,432,458
Stock based compensation		43,000			-			1,113,983
Depreciation expense		-			-			14,976
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses		(9,500	)		-			(9,500	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(83,096	)		714,169			1,160,610

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(538,317	)		(2,281	)		(6,240,319	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment		-			-			(1,785,299	)
Other receivables		(10,000	)		-			(925,239	)
Proceeds from mineral properties		-			-			551,227
Proceeds from investments		-			-			704,783
Additions to investments		-			-			(1,517,163	)

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(10,000	)		-			(2,971,691	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from loans		250,500			524			2,493,929
Repayment of loans		-			(1,781	)		(142,718	)
Recission of common stock		-			-			(879,500	)
Proceeds from common stock and preferred stock		300,000			3,467			7,744,514

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		550,500			2,210			9,216,225

NET DECREASE IN CASH		2,183			(71	)		4,215
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		2,032			4,707			-

CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	4,215		$	4,636		$	4,215

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

CASH PAID FOR:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	165,175
Income Taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-

NON CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Stock issued for mineral properties	$	-		$	-		$	45,000
Stock issued for accounts payable	$	62,000		$	-		$	62,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

NOBLE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES CORP. & SUBSIDIARY

(formerly U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 -

BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. The information furnished in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring adjustments and reflects all adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. Although management believes the disclosures and information presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that these interim condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in its December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Operating results for the three-months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for year ending December 31, 2009.

NOTE 2 -

GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONS

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reported in its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company has incurred operating losses of $8,254,314 from inception of the Company through December 31, 2008. The Company’s stockholders’ deficit at December 31, 2008 was $882,368. Additionally, the Company has sustained additional operating losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $896,246 as well as negative cash flows from operations. These factors combined, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management's plan is to obtain such resources for the Company by obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses and seeking equity and/or debt financing. However management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually ~~secure other sources of financing and~~ attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 –- ~~SIGNIFICANT~~MATERIAL ~~ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~EVENTS

~~Use~~On July 7, 2009, the Company negotiated a settlement with MPower, Inc., a private New Nevada corporation, in relation to a $73,500 judgment against the Company. In consideration for payment of the sum of $25,000 and delivery of 20,000 common ~~Estimates~~shares in the capital stock of the Company, MPower, Inc. released the Company from all further claims with respect to the matters addressed in the suit and consented to the filing of an Order to Dismiss in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada.

~~The~~On July ~~preparation~~15, of2009, ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~Company incompleted ~~conformity~~a share exchange with ~~generally~~Noble ~~accepted~~Technologies Corp, a ~~accounting~~private ~~principles~~Nevada ~~requires~~corporation ~~management~~(“Noble toTech”), ~~make~~engaged ~~estimates~~in the processing of mineralized concentrates for American mine owners and ~~assumptions~~operators. ~~that~~The Company ~~affect~~issued 400,000 Class A preferred shares (the ~~reported~~“Company ~~amounts~~Shares”) ofwhich ~~assets~~were delivered ~~and~~to ~~liabilities~~the ~~and~~22 ~~disclosure~~common shareholders of ~~contingent~~ ~~assets~~Noble ~~and~~Tech ~~liabilities~~in atconsideration for delivery to the ~~date~~Company of ~~the~~400,000 ~~financial~~common ~~statements~~shares ~~and~~ representing 100% of the issued ~~reported~~capital ~~amounts~~stock of ~~revenues~~Noble Tech. The issuance and ~~expenses~~delivery ~~during~~of the ~~reporting~~Company ~~period. Actual~~Shares ~~results~~effected ~~could~~not ~~differ~~only ~~from~~a ~~those~~change in control of the Company but also rendered ~~estimates.~~Noble Tech a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company

F - 5

~~Table~~NOBLE ofCONSOLIDATED ~~Contents~~INDUSTRIES CORP. & SUBSIDIARY

(formerly U.S. ~~CANADIAN~~ ~~MINERALS~~Canadian Minerals, ~~INC~~Inc.)

(AnA ~~Exploration~~Development Stage Company).

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008~~(Unaudited)

~~NOTE~~On July 316, –2009, ~~SIGNIFICANT~~the ~~ACCOUNTING~~director ~~POLICIES~~of ~~(CONTINUED)~~the Company, Van der Bok Busboom, appointed Thomas E. Barton Chown and Mark A. Kersey to serve as directors of the Company until the next annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders and, on the same date, the directors of the Company appointed Thomas E. Barton Chown to act as General Counsel to and President of the Company and Mark A. Kersey to act as Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company.

~~Recent~~On ~~Accounting~~July ~~Pronouncements~~16, 2009, Van der Bok Busboom resigned as officer and director of the Company and two material management consulting agreements with First Star Strategies, Inc. and Maria Regina Caeli Management Corp were terminated.

In ~~May~~the ~~2009,~~period ~~the~~between ~~FASB~~July ~~issued FAS 165~~15, ~~“Subsequent~~2009 ~~Events”. This pronouncement establishes standards for accounting for~~ and ~~disclosing~~August ~~subsequent events~~11, ~~(events~~2009, ~~which occur after~~ the ~~balance~~22 ~~sheet~~former ~~date~~shareholders ~~but before financial~~of ~~statements~~Noble ~~are~~Tech ~~issued~~converted ~~or are available to be issued). FAS 165 requires and entity to disclose~~ the ~~date~~Company ~~subsequent~~Shares ~~events~~into ~~were~~40,000,000 ~~evaluated~~common ~~and~~shares ~~whether~~in ~~that evaluation took place on~~ the ~~date financial statements were issued or were~~ ~~available~~capital tostock ~~be issued. It is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption~~ of ~~FAS 165 did not have a material impact on~~ the Company~~’s financial condition or results of operation~~.

InOn ~~June~~August 12, 2009, the ~~FASB~~Securities ~~issued~~and ~~FAS~~Exchange ~~166,~~Commission ~~“Accounting~~issued ~~for~~an ~~Transfers~~Order ofto ~~Financial Assets” an~~Suspend ~~amendment~~Trading of(the ~~FAS~~“Order”) ~~140.~~in ~~FAS~~relation ~~140 is intended~~ to ~~improve~~ the ~~relevance, representational~~common ~~faithfulness,~~shares ~~and comparability~~ of the ~~information~~Company. ~~that~~The aOrder ~~reporting~~was ~~entity~~effective ~~provides~~for inthe ~~its~~period ~~financial~~from ~~statements about a transfer of financial assets~~9:30am ~~the effects of a transfer~~ on ~~its~~August ~~financial position~~12, ~~financial performance~~2009 ,through ~~and cash flows~~11:59pm ~~and~~on August ~~a transferor’s continuing involvement~~25, if2009. ~~any, in~~The ~~transferred~~Order ~~financial~~indicated ~~assets.~~that ~~This~~“questions ~~statement~~have ~~must~~been beraised ~~applied~~about ~~as of~~ the ~~beginning~~accuracy ofand ~~each~~adequacy ~~reporting~~of ~~entity’s first~~publically ~~annual~~disseminated ~~reporting~~information ~~period~~concerning, among ~~that~~other ~~begins after November 15~~things, ~~2009~~ U.S. ~~The~~Canadian ~~Company~~Mineral’s ~~does~~liabilities, ~~not~~share ~~expect~~issuances, ~~the~~recent ~~adoption~~merger ~~of FAS~~transaction, ~~166~~business toprospects ~~have~~and anrecently ~~impact~~acquired ~~on the Company’s results of~~purported ~~operations, financial condition or cash flows~~assets”.

~~In June~~On ~~2009~~September 16, ~~the FASB issued FAS 167~~2009, ~~“Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) ”. FAS 167 is intended to (1) address~~ the ~~effects~~Company onexecuted ~~certain~~a ~~provisions~~Mutual ofRelease ~~FASB Interpretation~~with ~~No.~~First ~~46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest~~Star ~~Entities~~Strategies, asInc. ~~a result of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in FAS 166~~which, ~~and~~among ~~(2)~~other ~~constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of Interpretation 46(R)~~things, ~~including those~~effected ~~in which the accounting and disclosures under the Interpretation do not always provided timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement in~~ a ~~variable interest entity. This statement must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15~~$631, ~~2009~~638.36 ~~The~~reduction ~~Company does not expect the~~in ~~adoption of FAS 167 to have an impact on~~ the Company’s ~~results~~accounts ~~of operations, financial condition or cash flows~~payable.

InNOTE ~~June 2009,~~4 the FASB issued FAS 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. FAS 168 will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-~~existing~~ ~~non-SEC~~SUBSEQUENT accounting and reporting standards. All other non grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non authoritative. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 168 to have an impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.EVENTS

FOn October -1, 2009, the Company received a Certificate of Amendment from the 6Secretary of State for the State of Nevada which acknowledged a change in the name of the Company from U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. to Noble Consolidated Industries Corp.

~~Table~~On ofOctober ~~Contents~~9, 2009, the Company effectively changed its registrar and transfer agent from Pacific Stock Transfer Company to Interwest Transfer Co., Inc.

~~Item~~On October ~~2. Management’s~~20, ~~Discussion~~2009, the Company executed a Mutual Release with Maria Regina Caeli ~~and~~Management ~~Analysis~~Corp ofwhich, ~~Financial~~among ~~Condition~~other ~~and~~things, ~~Results~~secured ~~ofOperations~~a $556,313.86 reduction in the Company’s accounts payable.

~~This~~On ~~Quarterly~~October ~~Report~~21, on2009, ~~Form~~the ~~10-Q~~Company ~~contains~~transferred ~~forward-looking~~all ~~statements~~of ~~regarding~~its ~~our business~~right, ~~financial~~title ~~condition,~~and ~~results~~interest in the 260 acres of ~~operations~~contiguous ~~and~~minerals ~~prospects.~~rights ~~Words~~in ~~such as~~Mohave ~~“expects~~County,” ~~“anticipates,”~~Arizona ~~“intends~~that comprise the C.O.D. Project to Costena Resources,” ~~“plans~~Inc.,” a private Florida corporation (“~~believes,~~Costena”) ~~“seeks~~in consideration for a $2,”500,000 convertible promissory ~~“estimates”~~note ~~and~~that ~~similar~~bears ~~expressions~~interest orat ~~variations~~the rate of ~~such~~10% ~~words~~per ~~are~~annum ~~intended~~through toits 1 year term. ~~identify~~In ~~forward-looking~~the ~~statements~~event that Costena files a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is called for trading on an American stock exchange or otherwise makes a market for its common shares, ~~but~~the ~~are~~Company ~~not~~shall ~~deemed~~have the right to ~~represent~~convert anthe whole or any part of the principal secured and/or interest due ~~all-inclusive~~under ~~means~~the Costena note into common shares of ~~identifying~~Costena ~~forward-looking~~at ~~statements~~a asconversion ~~denoted~~price equivalent into ~~this~~a 20% discount to the average closing price of Costena’s common ~~Quarterly~~shares ~~Report~~as quoted on ~~Form~~such ~~10-Q~~stock exchange or trading facility through which a market for Costena’s common shares may be made for the 5 trading days prior to the Company’s notice of intention to convert as required under the Costena note. The ~~Additionally,~~Costena ~~statements~~note ~~concerning~~will ~~future~~be shown as a current asset on the balance sheet of the ~~matters~~Company ~~are~~for ~~forward-looking~~the ~~statements~~year ended December 31, 2009.

~~Although forward~~F-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. We caution the reader that numerous important factors, including those factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, which are incorporated herein by reference, could affect the our actual results and could cause our actual consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by, or on behalf of, U S Canadian Minerals. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”). Our website address is www.uscanadianminerals.com. You can also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. You can obtain additional information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including us.6

~~We undertake~~Item ~~no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q~~2. ~~Readers~~Management’s ~~are~~Discussion ~~urged to carefully review~~ and ~~consider~~ ~~the~~Analysis ~~various disclosures made throughout the entirety~~ of ~~this~~Financial ~~Annual Report,~~Condition ~~which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks~~ and ~~factors~~Resultsof ~~that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.~~Operations

~~As used~~Forward inLooking ~~this Quarterly Report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Corporation”, “the Company” and “U S Canadian” means U S Canadian Minerals Inc unless otherwise indicated.~~Statements

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Report contain forward-looking 4statements within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are based on Current expectations, estimates and projections about our business, management’s beliefs and assumptions made by management. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “should”, “could” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Theses statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements due to numerous factors including our ability to obtain capital to repay our debt and fund ongoing operations; our ability to fully implement our business plan; our ability to take advantage of new business opportunities as they arise; general economic and business conditions, both nationally and in our immediate regional market; the effect of government regulation in our industry; financing plans and the impact of our competition; anticipated trends in our business, and other risks discussed from time to time in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings and reports, including our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2008. In addition, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions and growth rates, and general domestic and international economic conditions. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Report.

~~Table~~Our website address is www.nobleconsolidated.com . You can also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. You can obtain additional information about the operation of ~~Contents~~the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet site ( www.sec.gov ) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including the Company.

~~Business of Issuer~~Overview

~~U.S.~~Noble ~~Canadian~~Consolidated ~~Minerals~~Industries isCorp ~~headquartered~~(the in“Company”), ~~Blaine~~through its wholly owned subsidiary, ~~WA.~~Noble OnTechnologies ~~its~~Corp ~~own~~(“Noble”) ~~and~~is ~~through~~a ~~Joint~~“down stream” service ~~Ventures,~~provider to mine owners and operators in the ~~Company~~United States. Noble is ~~looking~~not itself a mining company but rather a service provider to ~~expand~~the mining ~~properties~~industry ~~throughout~~and, ~~North~~as such, has positioned itself to take commercial advantage of currently high global commodity prices without the risk associated with mine exploration or the capital and ~~South~~operating ~~America~~costs associated with mine development and operation. Noble ~~The~~conducts ~~Company~~its ~~has~~business ~~the~~and ~~following~~mineral ~~projects~~processing operations at a 31,000 ~~which~~square foot ~~have~~facility ~~progressed~~located in McCarran, Nevada, approximately 15 miles east of Reno, toNevada ~~varying~~and ~~degrees~~just south of U.S. Interstate 80.

~~COD~~Noble has ~~Mine~~not yet commenced operations at the McCarran plant. Management of Noble has applied for all county and state permits required to install and operate the equipment required to process mineralized concentrates on a basis consistent with the Company’s business plan. Noble has received both a Building Permit and a temporary Business License from Storey County, Nevada and, accordingly, has commenced installation of the equipment required to process mineralized concentrates. Noble will commence operations upon receipt of the required air quality, water and mining permits from the State of Nevada.

On May 11, 2004, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with El Capitan Precious Metals Inc. to acquire 80% ownership of the COD minesite and claims located in Kingman Arizona. The Company was required to contribute 720,000 shares of its common stock to acquire this 80% interest in the minesite. This joint venture agreement entitles El Capitan Precious Metals Inc to receive 20%.of net profit.1

The ~~COD~~ ~~claims~~service ~~comprise~~to 13be ~~BLM~~provided ~~non~~by ~~patented~~Noble ~~Lode~~involves ~~claims~~the onutilization ~~Federal~~of ~~land.~~processing ~~Each~~equipment in ~~claim~~a is manner to designed to optimize recovery of 20precious ~~acres~~and/or ~~each~~base ~~for~~metals ain the ~~total~~processing of ~~260~~mineralized ~~acres~~concentrates into dore bars. ~~The~~On ~~annual~~behalf ~~fee~~of isthe Company, ~~$125~~Noble ~~for~~contracts ~~each~~with ~~20 acre~~the ~~claim~~owner ~~for~~of athe ~~total~~concentrates ~~annual~~and ~~claim~~is ~~fee~~compensated upon monetization of ~~$1625~~the dore. ~~The~~Noble’s ~~claims~~revenue ~~are~~model ~~located~~involves innegotiating the ~~Cerbat~~retention ~~Mountains outside~~ of ~~Kingman,~~a ~~Arizona.~~percentage ~~Specifically~~of ~~they~~the ~~are~~net ~~located~~funds ~~in Section~~realized ~~28,~~from ~~Township~~monetization 23of ~~North,~~the dore ~~Range~~after 17deduction ~~West,~~ of ~~Gila~~all ~~and~~costs ~~Salt~~associated ~~River~~with ~~Base~~production ~~and Meridian,~~of ~~approximately~~the ~~ten~~dore. ~~miles~~The percentage ~~north~~ of ~~Kingman,~~the ~~Arizona.~~net ~~Kingman~~funds isretained ~~located in~~by ~~the~~Noble ~~far~~is ~~northwest~~a ~~corner~~function of ~~Arizona~~the ~~along~~precious and/or ~~Interstate~~base ~~40,~~metal ~~U.S.~~content ~~Route~~in 66the ~~and Arizona~~concentrates ~~Route~~delivered 93for processing.

The minesite can be reached by taking the Stockton Hill Road exit off of Interstate 40 north to a distance of approximately ten miles. Continue on Stockton Hill Road to a subdivision road extending west. Follow the subdivision road to the second southern extension road. From this point there is a rough dirt road to the mine site which requires a truck, two or four wheel drive to access the mine site. Both the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have visited the site on more than one occasion. As well the Company has had a Geologist, “Qualified Person” as defined in NI 43-101 visit the property on more than one occasion.

Below are the claim names, book and page numbers and BLM A.M.C. numbers.

COD PROPERTY

COUNTY RECORDER

CLAIM NAME	BOOK NOS.	PAGE	BLM A.M.C. NUMBERS
JAYNE	841	806-807	175025
LIM	841	808-809	175026
ERIC	841	810-811	175015
MARC	841	812-813	175030
O.J.B.	841	814-815	175033
GOLDEN MOON	841	816-817	175024
RICO	841	834-835	175039

NOON NO. 1	841	832-833	175032
WHITE EAGLE	841	850-851	175044
WHITE EAGLE NO.2	841	852-853	175045
REUBE	841	848-849	175035
UNIT	841	846-847	175043
RENO	841	844-845	175034

- 5 -

Table of Contents

In the immediate area of the C.O.D. minesite and the other associated mines, the predominant rock is a fairly course microcline granite, probably of the Precambrian Era. This is associated with dark, fine-grained chlorite schist, in which the schistocity strikes North 20° West. There is a major jointing system which somewhat parallels the COD. Rico vein. This system is faulted with dikes and sills of altered basalt which prevails in the valley floor to the south and east.

In the immediate area of the mineite, the chlorite schist is prevalent with the Precambrian granites being exposed on the ridge lines flanking the granite gneiss and microcline granite. The major mineralization within the claim group is contained within polymetallic quartz veins exposed along northwest trending faults. The first major fault system is evidenced by the COD Rico vein which strikes North 80° West and dips in the area of the minesite at 85° to 80° to the northeast. Evidence of the fault movement is the slickenside which exists predominantly on the footwall side of the vein structure. The vein systems are well defined with little extension of the mineralization into the foot or hanging wall sections. However, cross-fracture patterning and faulting striking with the schistocity and plating have resulted in considerable brecciation and the formation of high-grade ore shoots into the wall rocks.

Examination of the vein material reflects a banding of mineralization in an inconsistent patterning with the ore values being clearly identifiable. The major areas and concentrations of high-grade mineralization are directly associated with the cross-faulting systems and fracture zones within the vein systems. The gangue minerals within the vein systems are quartz, with some calcite, calcium, carbonates and siderite. The ore minerals contained within the vein systems are gold, silver, pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, galena, bomite, covellite, chalcocite, anglesite, sphalerite, argentite, cerussite and smithsonite.

The mineralization is early to mid tertiary and possibly related to the laramide orogeny and appears to be associated with an unexposed pluton beneath the Ithica Peak quartz monzonite of Laramide age. The mineralization with these vein systems is both hypene and supergene with supergene action resulting in sporadic oxide zones above the 400-foot level.

The White Eagle vein system which is the second major vein system strikes North 46° West to North 58° West and dips at approximately 87° to the south. The White Eagle vein system is composed of three parallel structures, less than 15 feet apart in most areas along its strike length. These veins roughly parallel the schistocity, The multiple vein systems of the White Eagle with an approximate width of 35 feet are indicative of a probable shear associated with the northwesterly trend,

Between the COD Rico vein and the White Eagle vein, there exist four known parallel structures. One of the structures which runs through the Unit mining claim strikes North 85° West and dips at approximately 71° to the northeast, No information exists on the balance of the structure; however, the Unit system had significant amounts of Ruby silver in the dumps.

To date, the C.O.D. mine site has been worked by previous operators, by an incline shaft(78°-80°) to the 600-foot level and a winze that has been sunk to the 740-foot level. Major levels have been worked on the 400-, 500- and 600-foot levels.

The mine site was worked principally by a main shaft (No. 1) about 400 foot depth

and by drifts and stopes on and between two main and two subordinate levels aggregating about 2,500 feet of underground work.

- 6 -

Table of Contents

From the second, or 300-foot level to the surface, the ore, except some of the low grade, has been mostly stopped out for a distance of about 400 feet on either side of the shaft, especially on the east side beyond which good ore is reported. The second level extends to a point 900 feet west of the main shaft where connection with the surface is contemplated by a new double compartment shaft (No. 2) which is now 96 feet in depth and on completion is to be used as a main working shaft of the mine. At about 1,200 feet west of this shaft, a third shaft (No. 3) is sunk to the depth of 60 feet.

At the mine site there is currently no electricity, nearest electricity is approximately 1 mile away. In the past a generator was used. There is water in the main shaft at approximately the 100 foot level but no separate well or piped in water. A permit would be required to utilize water from the current underground shaft and tunnels. There is a main building which in the past served as an office and employee site. There is a water tank and a fuel tank. There is a temple above the main shaft but no winch. There is a rod mill and jaw crusher. The crushing line is on a concrete pad upon which is a steel beam covered structure

Management lacks technical training and experience with exploring for, starting, and/or operating a mine; and that with no direct training or experience in these areas, management may not be fully aware of many of the specific requirements related to working within this industry. Management’s decisions and choices may not take into account standard engineering or managerial approaches mineral exploration Companies commonly use; and our operations, earnings, and ultimate financial success could suffer due to management's lack of experience in this industry.

A map of the claims and a map of the geographical locale are found in Exhibits.

On May 30, 2009 a geological report was delivered to the Company by Duncan Bain P. Geo. Duncan Bain is a qualified person as defined by NI 43-101 requirements. The report he delivered is titled “REPORT ON PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION C.O.D. AU-AG PROJECT KINGMAN AREA, ARIZONA”. The entire report is available on the Company website www.uscanadianmin.com

No minerals were produced during the three months ended June 30, 2009.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company has achieved no significant revenue or profits to date, and the Company anticipates that it will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. The Company incurred a net loss of approximately $~~287~~896,~~273~~246 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, compared with a net loss of $~~405~~712,~~350~~807 for the ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008. The larger loss in ~~2008~~2009 ~~was~~is ~~due~~primarily due to the costs ~~incurred~~ inassociated ~~bringing~~with the ~~Company’s~~re-organization ~~securities~~of ~~filings~~the ~~current~~Company, ~~and~~the ~~expenses~~adoption ~~incurred~~and ~~seeking~~implementation ~~new~~of ~~mineral~~a ~~projects.~~materially ~~The~~different ~~loss~~business inplan, ~~2009~~the ~~was~~settlement ~~due~~of one tojudgment ~~due~~and toone ~~costs of~~law ~~auditors,~~suit ~~accountants,~~against ~~filings~~the Company, and ~~exploration~~the ~~and~~payment ~~general~~of old ~~expenses~~accounts payable incurred by previous management.

The Company’s 2009 activities ~~were~~to date have been financed primarily through the private placement of securities by its wholly owned subsidiary, Noble, and by loans from ~~management~~ shareholders.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~Since~~Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its ~~inception~~needs for cash. Over the past fiscal quarter our principal sources of liquidity encompassed cash provided from the private placement of Noble’s securities and shareholder loans. Our principal uses of liquidity generally include execution of the Company’s ~~has~~business ~~had~~plan, ~~limited~~specifically ~~operating~~the ~~capital~~application for required county and state permits, the assembly of the processing equipment into an efficient production line, preparation and ~~has~~filing ~~relied~~of ~~heavily~~all regulatory reports, professional onfees, ~~debt~~payroll and ~~equity~~related ~~financing~~expenses. Information regarding our cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is presented in our condensed, consolidated statements of cash flows contained in this Form 10-Q, and is further discussed below.

-At September 730, 2009, the Company’s cash and prepaid expenses totaled $13,715 in -available resources to fund $631,073 in accounts payable and accrued expenses. While management anticipates the commencement of Noble’s operations in the first quarter of the 2010 fiscal period, expenses will exceed revenues for the foreseeable future. Additional sources of cash will be necessary in the final quarter of the 2009 fiscal period and the first quarter of the 2010 fiscal period to fund the cash shortfall.

~~Table~~As of September 30, 2009, the Company had a working capital surplus (current assets minus current liabilities) of ~~Contents~~$1,870,229 as compared to a deficit of $882,368 under the Company’s previous management on December 31, 2008 (our last fiscal year end).

~~The~~Since its ~~financial~~inception ~~statements~~the asCompany ofhas ~~and~~had ~~for~~limited ~~the~~operating ~~period~~capital, ~~ended~~and onhas ~~June~~relied ~~30, 2009 expressed~~heavily ~~their~~on ~~substantial~~debt ~~doubt~~and asequity ~~to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern~~financing. Without additional capital, it is unlikely that the Company can continue as a going concern. The Company plans to raise operating capital via debt and equity offerings. However, there are no assurances that such offerings will be successful or sufficient to fund the operations of the Company. In the event the offerings are insufficient, the Company has not formulated a plan to continue as a going concern. Moreover, if such offerings are successful, they may result in substantial dilution to the existing shareholders.

~~Write down of Property Assets, Mineral Rights and Investment Assets~~2

~~In the~~Write-Down ~~2nd Quarter~~ of ~~2009~~Property ~~there~~Assets ~~were~~– noMineral ~~write~~Rights ~~downs~~and orInvestment ~~impairments of value of property assets, mineral rights or investment assets.~~Assets

In the 3rd Quarter of 2009 there were no write downs or impairments of value of property assets, mineral rights or investment assets.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, ~~there~~the ~~were~~Company nowas not a party to any off balance sheet arrangements.

Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, we have incurred a net loss of $229,~~706~~150,~~195~~560 since inception. To achieve profitable operations, we require additional capital for ~~obtaining~~marketing ~~producing~~purposes ~~mineral~~in ~~properties~~the ~~through~~effort ~~either~~to ~~the~~identify and secure ~~purchase~~more ofmineralized ~~producing~~concentrates ~~mines~~for orprocessing ~~successful~~through ~~exploration~~Noble’ ~~activity.~~s McCarran facility. Our management believes that sufficient funding will be available to meet our ~~business~~ business objectives including anticipated cash needs for working capital and is ~~currently~~ currently evaluating several financing options. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient funds to continue and, if successful, to commence the sale of our projects. .As a result of the foregoing, there exists substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31. The Company has not realized revenues from its intended operations as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and is classified as a development stage enterprise.

Revenue recognition

The Company will recognize revenue from the performance of its services and/or sale of its products in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements”. Revenue will be recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is provided, and collectability is assured. The Company had revenues of $-0- during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

- 8 -

Table of Contents

valuation allowances on deferred income tax losses. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Non-applicable to smaller reporting companies pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K.

Critical Accounting Policies

In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the following accounting policies fit this definition:

Stock-based compensation - The Company accounts for its stock options under SFAS 123(R).

There are no options issued to consultants for compensation at this time. Stock, when issued to compensate consultants has been valued on the day of issuance at its last traded market price. The fair value of the equity instruments granted served as the basis for measurement of the value of the services as the dollar amount owed was determined by the contracts in place for those services rendered and this was more reliably measurable than the value of the consideration received.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to valuation allowances on accounts receivable and inventory, valuation and amortization policies on property and equipment, and valuation allowances on deferred income tax losses. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

~~The major we have used is an estimated tax rate of 39% to be applied in valuation of our net Operating Loss carry forwards.~~3

-Item ~~9 -~~3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

~~Table of Contents~~Non-applicable.

~~ITEM~~Item 8A4. ~~CONTROLS~~ ~~AND~~Controls ~~PROCEDURES~~and Procedures

~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures~~Non-applicable.

~~Disclosure controls~~Item and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by our Company is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Van der Bok Busboom our CFO and Interim CEO and the person4(sT). ~~fulfilling~~Controls ~~the function of Principal Accounting Officer are responsible for establishing~~ and ~~maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for our Company~~Procedure.

Our management ~~has~~is ~~evaluated~~responsible ~~the~~for ~~effectiveness~~maintaining ~~of our~~ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined ofin ~~December~~Rule ~~31,~~13a-15(e) ~~2008~~and 15d-15(e) under the ~~supervision~~Securities ~~and~~Exchange ~~with~~Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), designed to insure that information we ~~participation~~are ofrequired to disclose in the ~~Chief~~reports ~~Executive~~that ~~Officer,~~we ~~Chief~~file ~~Financial~~or ~~Officer~~submit ~~and~~under the ~~person(s)~~Exchange ~~fulfilling~~Act ~~the~~is ~~function~~recorded, ofsummarized, ~~Principal~~processed ~~Accounting~~and ~~Officer)~~reported, ~~pursuant~~within tothe time ~~Rule13a-15(b)~~frames ~~promulgated~~specified ~~under~~in the Securities and Exchange ~~Act~~Commission’s ofrules ~~1934,~~and ~~as amended~~forms. As Disclosure ~~part~~controls ofand ~~such~~procedures ~~evaluation~~include, ~~management~~without ~~considered~~limitation, ~~the~~controls and ~~matters~~procedures ~~discussed~~designed ~~below~~to ~~relating~~ensure that information required to ~~internal~~be ~~control~~disclosed ~~over~~by ~~financial~~an ~~reporting. Based~~issuer onin ~~this~~the ~~evaluation,~~reports ~~our~~that ~~Company’s~~it ~~Chief~~files ~~Executive Officer~~or ~~and~~submits ~~Principal~~under ~~Accounting~~the ~~Officer~~Exchange ~~has~~Act ~~concluded~~is accumulated ~~that~~and ~~our~~communicated ~~Company~~to the issuer’s ~~disclosure~~ ~~controls~~management, ~~and~~including ~~procedures~~its ~~were~~principal executive ~~not~~officer ~~effective~~or asofficers ofand ~~December~~principal ~~31,~~financial ~~2008~~officer or officers, or ~~due~~persons toperforming ~~certain~~similar ~~material~~functions, ~~weaknesses~~as inappropriate ~~internal~~to ~~control~~allow ~~over~~timely ~~our financial~~decisions ~~reporting~~regarding timely disclosure.

~~At the~~The ~~end~~Company ofhas ~~2007,~~evaluated ~~Section~~the ~~404~~effectiveness of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~design ~~Act~~and ~~required~~operation ~~our~~of ~~management to~~its ~~provide~~disclosure ancontrols ~~assessment~~and procedures as of September 30, 2009 (the ~~effectiveness~~“Evaluation Date”). ofSuch ~~our~~evaluation ~~disclosure~~was ~~controls~~conducted ~~and~~by the Company’s principal executive ~~procedures,~~officer and atits ~~the~~principal ~~end~~financial ofofficer. ~~2009~~Based upon such evaluation, ~~our~~the Company’s ~~independent~~principal ~~registered~~executive ~~public~~officer and principal financial officer have ~~accountants~~concluded ~~will~~that, beas ~~required~~of tothe ~~audit~~Evaluation ~~management~~Date, the Company’s ~~assessment~~controls and disclosure procedures were effective. WeThere ~~completed~~have ~~our~~been changes in the Company’s internal ~~assessment~~controls ~~for~~over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal ~~year~~quarter, ~~ended~~that ~~December~~have ~~31,~~materially ~~2008~~affected, ~~and~~or ~~identified~~are ~~the~~reasonably likely to ~~following~~materially ~~material~~affect, ~~weaknesses:~~the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

We have been deficient in our interpretation of generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and in verifying our interpretations by conferring with additional qualified outside consultants, as well as our independent certified public accountants.

Our lack of financial resources and manpower to properly oversee and divide responsibility and provide for cross checking by a third party within the Company

Because of the material weaknesses noted above, management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies issued by (“COSO”). Accordingly, the Company has restated its financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.

Upon availability of sufficient financial resources it is our intention to implement remediation efforts with respect to the material weaknesses which shall include:

Establishing a system of external verification of our interpretations of GAAP with respect to all of our financial reporting obligations, by retaining and conferring with our private certified public accountant, , in conjunction with ongoing consultation with our independent certified public accounting firm that performs the audit of our financial statements and hiring of outside consultant(s) to assist in reviewing requirements for Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

- 10 -

Table of Contents

We believe the foregoing efforts will enable us to improve our internal control over financial reporting. Management is committed to continuing efforts aimed at improving the design adequacy and operational effectiveness of its system of internal controls. The remediation efforts noted above will be subject to our internal control assessment, testing and evaluation process.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, our Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the person(s) fulfilling the function of Principal Accounting Officer have concluded that our Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of December 31, 2007. Material weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting were due to:

Our lack of financial resources and manpower to properly oversee and divide responsibility and provide for cross checking by a third party within the Company.

Upon availability of sufficient financial resources it is our intention to implement remediation efforts with respect to the material weaknesses which shall include:

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the internal control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

- 11 -

Table of Contents

ITEM 8B. CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL

Changes In Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

In connection with the evaluation of the Company’s internal controls during the Company’s last fiscal year, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has determined that there are no changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially effect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

~~Mpower~~As of September 30, ~~Inc.~~2009, v.the ~~U.S. Canadian~~Company ~~Minerals,~~is ~~Inc.~~not -a ~~District~~party ~~Court~~to ~~Case~~any ~~No.~~litigation ~~A515024~~or other legal proceeding.

On December 28, 2005 Mpower, Inc. filed a Complaint against U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. in order to recover the sum of $38,808.27 due Mpower, Inc. from a promissory note executed on or about January 2, 2005. The promissory note U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. was being sued on was actually executed on behalf of Barrington Foods International, Inc. We did not contest the Mpower complaint. Thus, a default judgment was entered against U.S. Canadian in the amount of $53,287.04 on April 18, 2006. As June 30, 2009, the present value of the Mpower default judgment, including the judgment principal, interest to date and attorneys’ fees, is approximately $73,536.11.

On July 7, 2009 the Company executed a settlement agreement with Mpower, Inc. (the “Mpower Agreement”) whereunder the Company agreed to pay Mpower the sum of $25,000 and to cause the delivery of 20,000 common shares in the capital stock of the Company in full and complete satisfaction of Mpower’s default judgment (collectively referred to as the “Satisfaction”). The Company has thirty (30) days from the date of execution of the Mpower Agreement to deliver the Satisfaction into the trust account of the Company’s attorney in Nevada in order to secure final resolution of this matter and to secure a release from Mpower pursuant to the terms of the Mpower Settlement.

Steven M. Brewer v. U S Canadian Minerals Inc District Court Case No. A561515

On April 25, 2008, Steven M. Brewer filed a civil complaint against the Company in order to recover approximately $112,000 which was provided to the Company as working capital from November 2005 through 2006 (the “Brewer Suit”).

On July 5, 2009 the Company executed a settlement agreement with Mr. Brewer (the “Brewer Agreement”) whereunder it agreed to pay Mr. Brewer the sum of $112,000 in full and complete satisfaction of the Brewer Suit. The Company has thirty (30) days from the date of execution of the Brewer Agreement to deliver the $112,000 into the trust account of the Company’s attorney in Nevada in order to secure final resolution of this matter and to secure a release from Mr. Brewer pursuant to the terms of the Mpower Settlement.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Non-applicable to smaller reporting companies.

- 12 -

Table of Contents

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On(a) ~~June 1~~During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the ~~Corporation~~Company issued 2the following equity securities in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933,~~095~~ as amended,~~177~~ ~~common~~afforded ~~shares~~by ~~for services.~~Section 4(2) thereof:

~~345,177~~On July ~~common~~15, ~~shares~~2009, wethe Company issued an aggregate of 400,000 Class A preferred shares of the Company’s capital stock to ~~satisfy~~the ~~outstanding~~22 ~~invoices~~shareholders ~~owing~~of Noble Technologies Corp in consideration for delivery to the Company of $6400,000 ~~and~~common shares representing ~~$27,500~~100% of the issued capital stock of Noble Technologies Corp.

~~950,000 common shares were issued to satisfy an outstanding invoice owing of $28,500.~~4

800,000 common shares were issued to satisfy an outstanding invoice owing of $24,000.

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

~~No matters have been submitted to our security holders for a vote, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009.~~None

Item 5.

Other Information

British Columbia Securities Commission Claim of Jurisdictional Authority over the Company based on Canadian National Instrument 51-509

On June 26, 2009 the British Columbia Securities Commission (“BCSC”) notified the Company that, based on section 3 of NI 51-509 and the BCSC’s assertion that the business of the Company was directed or administered from British Columbia on or after September 15, 2008, the Company was a reporting issuer under the Securities Act of British Columbia (as amended). The Company disagrees with the position of the BCSC and has retained the services of a law firm based in British Columbia to contest this matter on behalf of the Company.

Information from current reports recently filed by the Company on Form 8-K

On ~~June~~July 320, 2009, the Company filed ~~an 8-K announcing the receipt of~~ a NICurrent ~~43-101 “REPORT~~Report ONon ~~PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION~~Form ~~C.O.D. AU~~8-AGK ~~PROJECT~~advising ~~KINGMAN~~as ~~AREA, ARIZONA” dated May 30, 2009 and~~to ~~authored~~completion byof ~~Duncan~~the ~~Bain,~~share aexchange ~~“qualified~~between ~~person” within~~ the ~~meaning~~Company ofand ~~that~~Noble ~~term~~Technologies asCorp ~~defined~~on inJuly NI15, ~~43-101~~2009.

~~Subsequent~~On August 17, 2009 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K advising as the terms associated with the Order to ~~June~~Suspend 30Trading issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2009 in relation to the common shares of the Company.

~~Amendment~~On ofAugust 28, ~~Certain~~2009 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K/A amending a Current ~~Information~~Report ~~from~~on ~~current~~Form ~~reports~~8-K ~~recently~~as filed by the Company on ~~Form~~June 3, 2009. In filing the 8amending report, the Company stressed that the “Report on Preliminary Examination” prepared by Duncan Bain in relation to the Company’s interest in the 260 acres of contiguous mineral rights in Mohave County, Arizona that comprise the C.O.D. Project (the “Report”) was not a N.I. 43-K101 compliant report and contained numerous inappropriate submissions within the context of S.E.C. standards for such geological reports. The Company advised that the Report was being treated as a geological report by the Company and, in order to avoid any confusion in the mind of the investing public, the Report was removed from the Company’s website.

OnThe Company ~~July~~reported ~~10, 2009~~ the ~~Company~~transfer ~~filed~~of ~~an 8-K/A~~all ~~with~~of ~~the~~its ~~Securities~~right, ~~Exchange~~title ~~Commission~~and ~~which~~interest ~~again~~in ~~addressed~~ the ~~content~~260 ~~and~~acres ~~interpretation~~ of ~~the~~contiguous ~~“REPORT~~minerals ONrights ~~PRELIMINARY~~in ~~EXPLORATION~~Mohave County, Arizona that comprise the C.O.D. ~~AU-AG PROJECT~~Project ~~KINGMAN~~to ~~AREA,~~Costena ~~ARIZONA” dated May 30~~Resources, ~~2009 (the “Report”)~~Inc. ~~The~~as ~~Report~~a ~~was posted~~“subsequent onevent” ~~the~~to the Company’s ~~website~~third ~~and~~quarter ~~interpretation~~ended ofSeptember ~~the~~30, ~~Report~~2009 ~~was~~in ~~left~~Note to4 ~~the reader~~above.

On September 16, 2009 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-KA 13amending a Current Report on Form 8-K as filed by the Company on July 20, 2009. In filing the amending report, the Company was observing its obligation under Regulation S-X, Rule 8-05 to provide required financial statements for an acquired business within 70 days of the date of acquisition. The Company filed both audited financial statements for Noble Technologies Corp’s year to 31/9/09 and pro forma financial statements for Noble Technologies Corp for the next three fiscal periods through December 31, 2012.

~~Table of Contents~~5

~~On July~~Subsequent ~~10,~~to ~~2009~~September the Company filed another Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities Exchange Commission (the “New K”) which again addressed the issue of the “REPORT ON PRELIMINARY EXPLORATION C.O.D. AU-AG PROJECT KINGMAN AREA, ARIZONA” dated May 30, 2009 (the “Report”). The New K addressed the matter of the Report’s compliance with the standards of disclosure required by NI 43-101. The New K has disclosed and advised that, in order to provide “consistency and clarity with respect to the timely discharge of the Company’s reporting obligations and with a view to avoiding any confusion to the public, the Report will be treated, regarded and reported as a document that is NOT COMPLIANT with the standards and requirements of NI 43-101” [emphasis added in original].

~~ITEM~~Information ~~6. EXHIBITS~~from current reports recently filed by the Company on Form 8-K

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1	BLM MAP and AREA MAP

On October 5, 2009 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K advising that on October 1, 2009, the Company received a Certificate of Amendment from the Secretary of State for the State of Nevada acknowledging the change in the name of the Company from U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. to Noble Consolidated Industries Corp.

-On October 14 , 2009 the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K advising that, effective at 5pm PDT on October 9, 2009, the Company had changed its registrar and transfer agent from Pacific Stock Transfer Company to Interwest Transfer Co., Inc.

~~Table~~On October 23, 2009, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K advising that, on October 21, 2009, the Company transferred all of ~~Contents~~its right, title and interest in the 260 acres of contiguous minerals rights in Mohave County, Arizona that comprise the C.O.D. Project to Costena Resources, Inc., a private Florida corporation, in consideration for a $2,500,000 convertible promissory note that bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum through its 1 year term.

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	U S Canadian Minerals Inc
	Noble Consolidated Industries Corp
Date:	~~July~~November 1524, 2009
	By:/s/ Van der Bok Busboom Van der Bok Busboom Title: President and CEO (Interim) Chief Financial Officer and Director
	By: /s/ Thomas E. Barton Chown
	Thomas E. Barton Chown
	Title: General Counsel / President
	By: /s/ Mark A. Kersey
	Mark A. Kersey
	Chief Financial Officer

~~- 15 -~~7

Table of Contents

Filing Compare · NOBLE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES CORP