UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: MARCH 31, ~~2012~~2013

o	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-254888

SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California	33-0230641
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12, Upland, CA	91786
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (801) 810-9888

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock $.001 par value

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x£

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2013 was approximately $112,~~254~~739,~~031~~257.

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s Common Stock as of ~~June~~July 2910, ~~2012~~2013 was 1665,~~659~~532,~~898~~793.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information	2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION	2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS	83
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES	811
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	811
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	811
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES	812
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	1013
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	1013
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	~~F-1 through F-27~~18
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.	1418
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.	1418
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION	1518
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	1519
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	1821
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS	2023
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	2224
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.	2426
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES	2427

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

All statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than statements of historical facts, that address future activities, events or developments are forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements containing the words "believe", "anticipate", "expect" and words of similar import. These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our assessment of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual results will conform to ~~the~~our expectations and predictions, ofwe ~~management is~~ are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated by ~~management~~us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on our business operations. These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The safe harbors of forward-looking statements provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are unavailable to issuers of penny stock. Our shares may be considered penny stock and such safe harbors set forth under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 may not be available to us.

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless the context requires otherwise, "we", "us" or the "Company", “SETS”, or “SET Corp.” means Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation, a California Corporation, and its divisions and subsidiaries.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Organizational History

We were incorporated on July 21, 1985 with the name International Beauty Supply Ltd. under the laws of the state of California. On May 28, 1993, we filed an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to change our name to L.L. Knickerbocker Co., Inc. On January 9, 2003, we filed an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to change our name to RG Global Lifestyles, Inc. On July 28, 2010, we filed an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to change our name to our current name, Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation.

On January 19, 2012, we filed an amendment to our articles to implement a one for fifteen reverse stock split and decreased our amount of authorized Common and Preferred stock to the amounts as noted below. However, the aforementioned amendment was not in effect until FINRA’s authorization on January 25, 2012.

The Corporation is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

For the past three (3) years, we have not filed for bankruptcy, receivership or any similar proceeding and have not effected any reclassification or merger, or consolidation.

General Overview of Business

Our business objective is dedicated to responsible resource utilization through environmentally sustainable technologies. With offices in Southern California, Utah, Colorado and North Dakota, our objective is to set the standard for responsible principles of sustainable development. Through patented technologies and strategic relationship and acquisitions, we intend to solve environmental issues with economic advantages to the consumer. Our technologies are intended to limit our customer’s environmental impact by conserving valuable and diminishing natural resources.

Current and future services include, and are expected to include, innovative eco-technologies that provide patented treatment, recovery, reclamation and re-injection services for Produced Water (which is associated with the oil and gas industry) and the ultra-efficient tri-gen systems that offer combined cooling, heating, and power generation with the added capability of water production from a single energy source. We offer complete sustainable energy solutions that bridge the gap between existing energy sources and the sustainable energy sources. Such design and application will meet the needs of tomorrow by preserving the natural resources of today. We also provide customized services that include design, construction, management, operation and maintenance services, and equipment manufacturing for the industrial and municipal sectors. With strategic partnerships, through prominent global manufacturers and distributors, we have access to a worldwide sales and distribution network.

The application of proven water treatment systems today is globally in high demand. So far in the U.S., our focus has been directed to the oil and gas industry where these ever-growing volumes of waste water must be dealt with to assure the continued supply of domestic petroleum products so desperately needed. This focus will be continued through the next year, and expanded throughout the Americas and into Canada and other countries. Our wholly owned subsidiary Pro Water, LLC, a Utah Corporation (“PWU”), is currently capitalizing on this opportunity in its Utah facility as discussed below.

Principal Products and Services

Products

PWC Centerline SWD SYSTEM

On August 1, 2011, management formed a wholly owned subsidiary, ProWater, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“PWC”), which owns the proprietary Centerline salt water disposal system (“Centerline SWD System”). Designed by management with experience gained through the building and operating of the Utah facility, Centerline SWD System is a containerized, module, movable system that utilizes green technology to efficiently separate oil, water and other by-products produced from oil and gas operations. Centerline SWD System is a unique state-of-the-art system that is based on strategic utilization following a three-pronged approach for deriving revenue: 1) sale of oil; 2) sale of water; and the 3) reinjection of cleaned water. This three-pronged approach enables PWC to derive revenue and safely dispose of the remaining components by selling oil to refiners and providing processed water for use in hydraulic fracturing or water injection. Applied to approved formations, this re-used water is injected thousands of feet below potential ground water zones.

~~The~~PART Centerline SWD System is a highly automated, self-monitoring, self-diagnostic, modular facility that can be completely built and installed in ninety (90) days. The Centerline SWD System modules are dropped in place, bolted together, and connected to main power lines and can be turned on to heat the balance of the facility while final plumbing connections to the tank farm are completed. One of the greatest benefits to the modular system is that these portable units can be built in modern climate controlled facilities that allow them to be built year round. PWC Centerline SWD System facilities are more efficient, requiring less manual labor for the direct benefit of its customers, processing the average water truck in less than half the time of the industry standard.I

~~Centerline~~ITEM ~~SWD System, utilizes Class II SWD wells that are recognized as one of the safest forms of disposing Produced Water~~1. It would take three separate, simultaneous integrity failures to pose any environmental risk. With agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency set to release new national standards for the disposal of Produced Water, generated from shale formations, each Centerline SWD System contains a complex safety system with a series of redundant controls that exceed local, state and federal requirements. The system is designed in such a way that if it encounters even one safety abnormality, the entire facility is immediately and automatically shut down, it further issues alerts to multiple predetermined individuals. No further water can be taken into the facility or pumped down hole until the safety issue is evaluated and resolved.BUSINESS

~~PWC’s~~When ~~Centerline~~used ~~SWD~~in ~~System~~this ~~intelligently~~Annual ~~combines~~Report, ~~highly~~unless ~~efficient~~the context ~~process~~requires ~~controls~~otherwise, ~~with~~"we", ~~best~~"us" inor ~~class~~the ~~technologies~~"Company", ~~and installs them into portable modular buildings. The Centerline SWD System utilizes a horizontal GE™ surface pumping systems (~~“~~SPS~~SETS”~~) that features a directly-coupled~~, ~~multistage~~or ~~centrifugal~~“SET ~~pump~~Corp” means Sustainable ~~that~~Environmental isTechnologies ~~uniquely designed for high pressure~~Corporation, ~~low to medium flow and environmentally sensitive applications. The SPS pump has low maintenance requirements,~~ a ~~long~~California ~~run-life and can be easily modified in the field. The addition of variable speed drives and logic control systems lower operating costs and improve reliability~~Corporation, ~~while providing intelligent monitoring~~ and ~~control~~its ~~capabilities. Another~~divisions ~~key advantage of the Centerline SWD System is the ability to maintain full manufacturing~~ and ~~construction capacity year round~~subsidiaries. The Centerline SWD System clarifies produced oilfield waters to the extent that they can be used in water-flooding to drive more oil from the earth, and/or allow it to be disposed of in Class II SWD wells. This cleaned water can also be used as frac water in the oilfields where there is new drilling or water flooding activities.

~~DynIX™~~Organizational ~~Technology~~History

~~Our~~We ~~proprietary~~were ~~DynIX™~~incorporated ~~wastewater treatment technology is based~~ on anJuly ~~ion-exchange~~21, ~~process~~1985 ~~for~~ with the ~~treatment~~name ~~and~~International ~~reclamation~~Beauty ofSupply ~~Produced Water~~Ltd. ~~The~~under ~~DynIX™~~the ~~technology~~laws ~~can~~of bethe ~~used~~state asof aCalifornia. On ~~pre-treatment~~May ~~that~~28, ~~allows~~1993, ~~systems~~we ~~such~~filed asan ~~reverse osmosis filtration~~ amendment to ~~work~~the ~~more~~Articles ~~efficiency~~of orIncorporation asto achange ~~standalone~~our ~~system~~name ~~that~~to ~~removes~~L.L. ~~sodium~~Knickerbocker ~~and~~Co., ~~other~~Inc. On ~~pollutants~~January ~~from~~9, ~~Produced~~2003, ~~Water~~we ~~allowing~~filed itan amendment to ~~be returned to~~ the ~~environment~~Articles ~~within local, state and federal environmental compliance regulations. The successful removal~~ of ~~the~~Incorporation ~~treated~~to ~~Produced~~change ~~Water~~our inname ~~turn allows energy companies~~ to ~~harvest~~RG ~~and~~Global ~~sell methane~~Lifestyles, ~~gas~~Inc. On ~~and~~July ~~oil~~28, ~~associated~~2010, ~~with~~we ~~such~~filed an ~~fields.~~amendment ~~The~~to ~~Company~~the ~~receives~~Articles aof ~~royalty~~Incorporation ~~from~~to ~~the~~change ~~customer~~our ~~for~~name ~~every~~to ~~barrel~~our ofcurrent ~~Produced~~name, ~~Water~~Sustainable ~~treated~~Environmental ~~and~~Technologies ~~purified~~Corporation.

InOn ~~April~~January of19, ~~2008~~2012, we ~~constructed~~filed ~~and successfully tested our first plant in Wyoming in connection with~~ an ~~agreement with Yates Petroleum, Inc. This agreement was structured on a “build, own and operate” economic model whereby we provided a “turnkey” plant~~ amendment to ~~Yates~~our ~~Petroleum~~Articles ~~and charged a royalty per barrel~~ of ~~cleaned~~Incorporation ~~Produced~~to ~~Water.~~implement ~~We received~~ a ~~fixed~~one ~~royalty~~ for ~~every~~fifteen ~~barrel~~reverse ofstock ~~Produced~~split, ~~Water treated~~ and additionally ~~purified~~decreased ~~and~~our ~~maintained ownership~~ amount of ~~the~~authorized ~~equipment~~common ~~under~~and apreferred ~~five-year~~stock ~~contract. After unsuccessfully attempting~~ to ~~negotiate~~the aamounts ~~higher~~as ~~royalty~~noted ~~rate~~below. However, wethe ~~decided~~aforementioned toamendment ~~shut~~was ~~the~~not in ~~plant~~effect ~~down~~ until aauthorized ~~buyer~~by FINRA ~~could~~on beJanuary ~~found. Subsequent to shutting down the plant~~25, ~~Yates Petroleum, Inc~~2012. ~~cancelled its agreement with us.~~

WeOn ~~have changed our~~December ~~strategy~~28, ~~from~~2012, ~~solely~~we afiled ~~build-to-sell~~an ~~manufacturing~~amended ~~environment~~and restated Articles of Incorporation with the California Secretary of State. The certificate of the amended and restated Articles of Incorporation were filed to ~~include~~consolidate aall ~~royalty-based~~of ~~model~~our ~~whereby~~previous weamendments ~~would~~into ~~license~~one ~~its~~filing ~~DynIX™~~and, ~~Technology~~second, to ~~achieve~~correct ~~royalty~~a ~~income~~minor error regarding the voting threshold of Series A preferred shareholders.

~~MultiGen~~We ~~Technology~~are authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. Our preferred stock has been designated as the Series A Preferred Stock, with such rights and preferences as set forth in our amended and restated Articles of Incorporation.

~~The~~For ~~MultiGen~~the ~~technology~~past isthree a(3) ~~highly efficient~~years, ~~reliable,~~we ~~low-emission~~have ~~and~~not filed ~~commercially~~for ~~proven integrated solution that uses natural gas~~bankruptcy, ~~biogas,~~receivership ~~diesel~~ or ~~other~~any ~~fuels~~similar toproceeding power a micro-turbine that in turn powers a chiller running our patent-pending air conditioning/water-from-air generation unit. As utilized in Australia, the MultiGen technology was able to achieve up to 95% overall efficiency by the onsite generation of water, air conditioning, electrical power, heating and ~~cooling~~have ~~water. In~~not ~~addition,~~effected asany ~~utilized~~reclassification inor ~~Australia~~merger, ~~the~~or ~~MultiGen technology can save as much as 400 tons of CO2 per year when compared to using grid-supplied electricity~~consolidation. ~~The result is greater efficiencies with respect to water and energy use, significant improvement of security of supply, and a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, all at less cost.~~

3General Overview of Business

~~When~~Our ~~operating~~business onobjective ~~natural~~is ~~gas~~dedicated to responsible resource utilization through environmentally sustainable technologies. With offices in Southern California, ~~the~~Utah, ~~MultiGen~~Colorado ~~technology~~and North ~~can~~Dakota, ~~reduce~~our ~~grid-supplied~~objective ~~power~~is ~~requirements~~to ~~for~~set the ~~same~~standard ~~functions~~for byresponsible ~~approximately~~principles ~~50%~~of assustainable ~~utilized~~development. Through inpatented technologies ~~Australia.~~and Itstrategic isrelationships ~~ideally~~and ~~suited~~acquisitions, we intend to ~~locations~~solve ~~where~~environmental ~~natural~~issues ~~gas-produced~~with ~~electricity~~economic isadvantages ~~cheaper~~to the ~~than~~consumer. ~~grid~~Our ~~supplied,~~technologies asare ~~well~~intended asto ~~disaster~~limit our ~~areas~~customer’s ~~and~~environmental ~~remote~~impact ~~areas~~by ~~without~~conserving ~~existing~~valuable ~~utility~~and diminishing ~~infrastructure~~natural resources.

~~Unlike~~Our ~~typical~~current ~~co-gen~~and future services include, and are ~~tri~~expected to include, innovative eco-~~gen~~technologies ~~systems~~that provide patented treatment, recovery, reclamation and re-injection services for Produced Water (which is associated with the ~~MultiGen technology has~~oil aand ~~much~~gas ~~smaller~~industry). Our ~~equipment~~strategy ~~footprint~~is to offer complete sustainable energy solutions to customers that bridge the gap between existing energy sources and the sustainable energy sources. Such design and application will meet the needs of tomorrow by preserving the natural resources of today. We also provide customized services that include design, ~~requires~~construction, ~~less~~management, operation and maintenance services, isand ~~quieter,~~equipment manufacturing for the industrial and ~~can~~municipal sectors. Therefore, we continue to be ~~easily~~competitive ~~retrofitted~~with our competitors, which range from small start-up enterprises to ~~existing~~companies ~~facilities~~that orare ~~installed~~larger inand ~~new~~more ~~developments~~established than us with access to significant financial resources.

~~Services~~The application of proven water treatment systems today is globally in high demand. So far in the U.S., our focus has been directed to the oil and gas industry where these ever-growing volumes of wastewater must be dealt with to assure the continued supply of domestic petroleum products so desperately needed. This focus will be continued through the next year, and expanded throughout the Americas and into Canada and other countries. Our wholly owned subsidiaries, Pro Water, LLC, a Utah Corporation (“Pro Water Utah”), and ProWater, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“ProWater Colorado”), are currently capitalizing on such opportunities in our facilities in Utah and North Dakota as discussed below.

~~PWU~~Principal ~~Blue~~Products ~~Bench~~and ~~Class II Salt Water Disposal Well in Utah~~Services

Through an acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of PWU, the Company acquired PWU’s Blue Bench Class II Salt Water Disposal (“SWD”) well. The Blue Bench Class II SWD well is owned and operated by PWU in Duchesne, Utah and is one of the few, available methods for disposing Produced Water in that area. PWU’s Blue Bench Class II SWD well takes the Produced Water brought in from customers in Duchesne, Utah and converts that Produced Water into processed water which can be reused when drilling for oil and gas or alternatively safely injected into approved formations thousands of feet below potential ground water zones.Products

~~PWU’s~~Centerline SWD well resides on two five-acre parcels. With the exception of a few outlying buildings, PWU’s Blue Bench Class II SWD well has been completely re-designed to increase the capacity for production and allow the Blue Bench Class II SWD well to operate during the winter months. With the completion of the upgrades and automation, the redesigned Blue Bench Class II SWD well is capable of handling over 7,000 barrels of Produced Water per day. Efficiency and automation designs allow PWU’s Blue Bench Class II SWD well to operate with minimal labor while achieving maximum production results. PWU’s Blue Bench Class II SWD well serves as a showpiece, as it is a modern and innovative injection well. SYSTEM

~~PWC~~On August 1, 2011, we formed our wholly owned subsidiary, ProWater Colorado, which owns our proprietary Centerline ~~Salt~~salt-water ~~Water~~disposal ~~Disposal~~system ~~Wells~~(“Centerline SWD System”). Designed with experience gained through the building and operating of our Utah Blue Bench Class II salt water disposal (“SWD”) Well in ~~North~~Duchesne, ~~Dakota~~Utah, the Centerline SWD System is a containerized, module, movable system that utilizes green technology to efficiently separate oil, water and other by-products produced from oil and gas operations. The Centerline SWD System is a unique state-of-the-art system that is based on strategic utilization following a three-pronged approach for deriving revenue: 1) sale of water; 2) sale of oil; and the 3) reinjection of cleaned water. This three-pronged approach will enable us to derive revenue and safely dispose of the remaining components by selling oil to refiners and providing processed water for use in hydraulic fracturing or water injection. Applied to approved formations, this re-used water is injected thousands of feet below potential ground water zones.

Through our wholly owned subsidiary PWC and its wholly owned subsidiary Blue Bench, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“BB”) formed on April 5, 2012 we plan to construct three SWD wells utilizing PWC’s Centerline SWD System as described above.3

WeThe ~~have~~Centerline ~~completed~~SWD ~~the~~System ~~drilling~~is ~~and~~a ~~production~~highly ~~casing~~automated, self-monitoring, ofself-diagnostic, ~~the~~modular ~~first~~facility. The ~~well~~Centerline SWD System modules are dropped in ~~Cartwright~~place, ~~North~~bolted ~~Dakota~~together, and ~~(the~~connected ~~"Cartwright~~to ~~Well"). The~~main ~~portable~~power ~~Centerline~~lines ~~SWD~~and ~~System~~can ~~for~~be ~~the~~turned ~~salt~~on ~~water~~to ~~disposal~~heat ~~well~~the isbalance ~~being~~of ~~built~~the infacility ~~Casper,~~while ~~Wyoming~~final ~~and~~plumbing isconnections into the ~~its~~tank ~~final~~farm ~~stages~~are ~~of construction~~completed. ~~Thus,~~One weof ~~anticipate~~the greatest benefits to the ~~completion~~modular ofsystem ~~this~~is ~~well~~that ~~within~~these ~~the~~portable ~~next~~units 45can be built in modern climate controlled facilities that allow them to 90be ~~days~~built year round. The ~~well~~Centerline ~~was~~SWD ~~drilled~~System onfacilities are 10more ~~acres~~efficient, ofrequiring ~~land~~less wemanual ~~have~~labor infor ~~Cartwright,~~the ~~North~~direct ~~Dakota. This~~benefit ~~sight~~of ~~has~~its ~~easy~~customers, ~~highway~~processing ~~access~~the ~~and~~average iswater truck in less athan ~~prime~~half ~~drilling~~the ~~area~~time ~~for~~of ~~oil wells in~~ the ~~Bakken~~industry ~~formation~~standard.

~~Operational~~The ~~History~~Centerline SWD System utilizes Class II SWD wells that are recognized as one of the safest forms of disposing Produced Water. It would take three separate, simultaneous integrity failures to pose any environmental risk. With agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) set to release new national standards for the disposal of Produced Water, generated from shale formations, each Centerline SWD System contains a complex safety system with a series of redundant controls that exceed local, state and federal requirements. The system is designed in such a way that if it encounters even one safety abnormality, the entire facility is immediately and automatically shut down, and it further issues alerts to multiple predetermined individuals. No further water can be taken into the facility or pumped down the hole until the safety issue is evaluated and resolved.

~~Pro~~The ~~Water~~Centerline ~~Utah~~SWD System intelligently combines highly efficient process controls with best in class technologies, and installs them into portable modular buildings. The Centerline SWD System utilizes a horizontal GE™ surface pumping systems (“~~PWU~~SPS”) that feature a directly-coupled, multistage centrifugal pump that is uniquely designed for high pressure, low to medium flow and environmentally sensitive applications. The SPS pump has low maintenance requirements, a long run-life and can be easily modified in the field. The addition of variable speed drives and logic control systems lower operating costs and improve reliability, while providing intelligent monitoring and control capabilities. Another key advantage of the Centerline SWD System is the ability to maintain full manufacturing and construction capacity year round. The Centerline SWD System clarifies produced oilfield waters to the extent that they can be used in water-flooding to drive more oil from the earth, and/or allow it to be disposed of in Class II SWD wells. This cleaned water can also be used as frac water in the oilfields where there is new drilling or water flooding activities.

~~DES~~DynIX™ Technology

OnOur ~~April~~proprietary ~~23,~~DynIX™ ~~2012~~wastewater wetreatment technology ~~entered~~is based ~~into~~on aan ~~letter~~ion-exchange ofprocess ~~intent~~for ~~with~~the ~~Dehydration~~treatment &and ~~Environmental~~reclamation ~~Systems,~~of ~~Inc~~Produced Water. ~~(“DES”)~~The toDynIX™ ~~test~~technology can ~~DES’s~~be ~~DryVac~~used ~~technology~~as ata ~~the~~pre-treatment ~~Blue~~that ~~Bench~~allows ~~Class~~systems IIsuch ~~SWD~~as ~~well. The~~reverse ~~DryVac's~~osmosis ~~technology~~filtration ~~involves~~to awork ~~patented~~more ~~filtration,~~efficiency ~~thermal~~or ~~drying~~as ~~and~~a ~~water~~standalone system ~~processing~~that ~~developed~~removes sodium and ~~owned~~other bypollutants ~~DES~~from toProduced ~~separate~~Water ~~solid~~allowing ~~contaminants~~it ~~found~~to inbe ~~waste~~returned ~~streams~~to ~~such~~the asenvironment ~~Produced~~within ~~Water. We~~local, state ~~will~~and ~~evaluate~~federal ~~this~~environmental ~~product~~compliance atregulations. ~~our~~The ~~well~~successful inremoval ~~Duchesne,~~of ~~Utah~~the totreated ~~see~~Produced ifWater ~~this~~in ~~technology~~turn ~~would~~allows beenergy companies ato ~~valuable~~harvest ~~addition~~and tosell ~~all~~methane, ofgas ~~our~~and ~~SWD~~oil ~~wells. At~~associated ~~this~~with ~~time,~~such wefields. ~~believe~~The ~~that~~Company ~~this~~receives ~~technology~~a ~~has~~royalty from the ~~potential~~customer for toevery ~~significantly~~barrel ~~increase~~of ~~our~~Produced ~~revenue~~Water ~~streams~~treated atand ~~our SWD wells~~purified.

~~Blue~~In ~~Bench~~April IIof ~~SWD~~2008, we constructed and successfully tested our first plant in Wyoming in connection with an agreement with Yates Petroleum, Inc. This agreement was structured on a “build, own and operate” economic model whereby we provided a “turnkey” plant to Yates Petroleum and charged a royalty per barrel of cleaned Produced Water. We received a fixed royalty for every barrel of Produced Water treated and purified and maintained ownership of the equipment under a five-year contract. After unsuccessfully attempting to negotiate a higher royalty rate, we decided to shut the plant down until a buyer could be found. Subsequent to shutting down the plant, Yates Petroleum, Inc. cancelled its agreement with us. As a result, we have changed our strategy from solely a build-to-sell manufacturing environment to include a royalty-based model whereby we would license our DynIX™ Technology to achieve royalty income.

OnWhile ~~July 7, 2010,~~ we ~~entered~~believe ~~into the~~that ~~Pro~~DynIX™ ~~Water~~provides an ~~acquisition agreement~~efficient ~~(the~~environmental ~~"Pro Water Agreement") to acquire 100% of the membership interests of PWU~~solution, ~~from~~current ~~its~~natural ~~sole member,~~gas ~~Metropolitan Real Estate~~prices, ~~LLC~~as (the “Metropolitan”), a New York limited liability company. Metropolitan is an entity controlled by Horst Franz Geicke, a beneficial owner of the Company. PWU’s sole business is its ownership and operation of the SWD well ~~and~~as ~~refinery~~new inregulations ~~Duchesne, Utah. In exchange for the purchase of the membership interest of PWU, we assumed all PWU debts, 1,333,333 shares of our restricted common stock were~~ related to ~~be issued, and a convertible secured promissory note (~~the ~~"Pro~~surface ~~Water~~discharge ~~Note") was to be issued. The amount~~ of the ~~Pro~~related ~~Water~~water ~~Note~~have ~~was~~minimized inany ~~the~~available ~~amount~~sale ~~of $2,000,000, at an interest rate of 5% per annum, payable quarterly over a period of one year commencing on the closing date of the Pro Water Agreement~~opportunities. In addition, the Pro Water Note had a conversion feature, which at the sole option of the holder, would convert the Pro Water Note into shares of restricted common stock at a price of $1.50 per share. The Pro Water Note is secured by all of the assets of PWU. Subsequent to the closing of the Pro Water Agreement, PWU became our wholly-owned subsidiary.

4MultiGen Technology

OnThe ~~July~~MultiGen ~~12,~~technology ~~2010,~~is ~~the~~a ~~terms~~highly ofefficient, reliable, ~~the~~low-emission ~~Pro~~and ~~Water~~commercially ~~Agreement~~proven ~~were~~integrated ~~amended~~solution ~~whereby~~that ~~the~~uses ~~number~~natural ofgas, ~~shares~~biogas, ofdiesel ~~common~~or ~~stock~~other ~~paid~~fuels to ~~Metropolitan~~power a ~~was~~micro-turbine ~~increased~~that toin ~~2,222,222~~turn ~~(from~~powers ~~1,333,333). In~~a ~~addition,~~chiller ~~the~~running ~~conversion~~our ~~rate~~patent-pending ofair ~~the~~conditioning/water-from-air ~~Pro~~generation ~~Water Note~~unit. ~~was~~As ~~also~~utilized in ~~amended. Previously~~Australia, the ~~Pro~~MultiGen ~~Water~~technology ~~Note~~ was able to beachieve ~~converted~~up atto ~~$1.50~~95% ~~per~~overall ~~share,~~efficiency ~~however~~by the ~~Pro~~onsite ~~Water~~generation ~~Note~~of ~~was amended~~water, soair ~~that~~conditioning, electrical $1power,~~600,000~~ ofheating ~~the~~and ~~Pro~~cooling ~~Water Note would be converted at $3~~water.00 In ~~per share and $400~~addition,~~000~~ ~~would~~as beutilized ~~converted~~in atAustralia, ~~$0.375~~the ~~per~~MultiGen ~~share. The Pro~~technology ~~Water~~can ~~Note~~save as ~~was~~much ~~also~~as ~~amended~~400 totons ~~have~~of ~~the~~CO2 ~~following~~per ~~payment~~year ~~schedule:~~when i)compared ~~$100,000~~to ~~paid~~using ongrid-supplied orelectricity. ~~before~~The ~~September~~result ~~30,~~is ~~2010;~~greater ~~ii)~~efficiencies ~~$200,000~~with ~~paid~~respect to onwater orand ~~before~~energy ~~December 31~~use, ~~2010;~~significant ~~iii)~~improvement ~~$200,000~~of ~~paid~~security onof ~~or before March 31~~supply, ~~2011~~ and ~~vi)~~a ~~the~~reduction ~~remaining amount~~ of ~~$1,500,000~~greenhouse ~~with~~gas ~~unpaid interest on or before June 30~~emissions, ~~2011.~~all ~~The~~at ~~$100,000 payment due in September 2010, was paid in October of 2010~~less cost.

On January 14, 2011, the terms of the Pro Water Note were amended for a second time. As of the date of the second amendment, the unpaid principal amount was $1,880,000. Under the terms of the second amendment, the term of the Pro Water Note was extended for five (5) years and all accrued interest was forgiven. In addition, our payments were to be in sixty (60) monthly payments of $35,478 commencing January of 2011 and concluding December of 2015, subsequently extended to April 2016. All other terms, including conversion and interest rates have remained the same as in the first amendment to the Pro Water Note. The Company accounted for the change in terms of the debt as an extinguishment of the debt due to the significant change in the repayment period. 4

~~The~~When ~~acquisition~~operating ofon ~~PWU~~natural ~~was~~gas, ~~accounted~~the ~~for~~MultiGen technology ascan areduce ~~reverse~~grid-supplied ~~acquisition~~power inrequirements ~~accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 Business Combinations. We determined~~ for ~~accounting and reporting purposes that Pro Water was~~ the ~~acquirer~~same ~~because~~functions ofby ~~the~~approximately ~~significant~~50% ~~holdings~~as ~~and~~utilized ~~influence~~in ofAustralia. ~~Horst~~It is ~~Franz~~ideally ~~Geicke~~suited ~~before~~to ~~and~~locations ~~after~~where ~~the~~natural ~~acquisition.~~gas-produced Aselectricity ais ~~result~~cheaper ofthan ~~the~~grid ~~transaction~~supplied, ~~Horst~~as ~~Franz~~well ~~Geicke,~~as ~~individually~~disaster areas and ~~through~~remote ~~entities~~areas ofwithout ~~which~~existing heutility ~~has common control (the “Control Group”) owned in excess of 44% of issued and outstanding common stock of the Company on a diluted basis~~infrastructure.

~~Because~~Unlike ~~SWD~~typical ~~wells~~co-gen ~~are essential to the responsible processing of Produced Water from the oil~~ and ~~gas~~tri-gen ~~industry~~systems, ~~we acquired PWU to expand our water processing services for~~ the ~~disposal~~MultiGen technology has ofa ~~Produced~~much ~~Water.~~smaller ~~Through~~equipment ~~PWU’s Blue Bench Class II SWD well in Utah~~footprint, werequires ~~have~~less ~~established a customer base and are currently generating a positive monthly cash flow. Furthermore~~maintenance, ~~since~~is ~~January of 2011~~quieter, ~~business of PWU’s Blue Bench Class II SWD well has steadily increased as local governments increase regulations~~ and ~~restrictions~~can ~~for~~be ~~disposing~~easily retrofitted ~~Produced Water. While there are several key factors~~ to ~~obtaining~~existing ~~new~~facilities ~~business,~~or ~~the~~installed ~~ratio~~in ~~of available business per customer is based solely on the number of oil and gas wells the customer has within the serviceable radius of the injection well. As~~ new ~~oil and gas wells are developed within the serviceable radius of PWU’s Blue Bench Class II SWD well, the ratio of customers to percentage of business will increase~~developments.

~~ProWater~~After ~~Colorado~~extended delays, World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd., an Australian company (“~~PWC~~WES”), was able to install the first, patent pending production model, MultiGen in Australia. After over a year delay, the production model was partially started in October of 2012 with the water-maker and AC unit put into service first. The Capstone generator was successfully commissioned on February 2, 2013 and was anticipated to be put into complete 24-hour operation in March of 2013, but has been delayed indefinitely. This first installation was done in conjunction with the Queensland Government and their relationship with the TAFE School. This first project will allow us the opportunity to do additional government projects in Australia, as the MultiGen has now passed Australia’s rigorous installation and permitting processes. The current installation will soon allow us to show customers the MultiGen in an actual operating environment with real-time monitoring of all outputs including electricity, heat, air conditioning and water production.

~~Our~~We ~~wholly~~have ~~owned~~carefully ~~subsidiary,~~evaluated ~~PWC,~~the delays in ~~which~~getting wethe ~~plan~~first MultiGen to ~~develop~~market, ~~additional~~the ~~technologies~~effects ~~for~~that ~~disposing~~such ofdelays ~~salt~~have ~~water~~had ~~from~~on ~~oil~~the value of such assets, and ~~gas~~WES’s inability ~~wells~~to fulfill previous sales projections, ~~including~~combined ~~technologies~~with ~~such~~the asdirect ~~Centerline~~effect ~~SWD~~this ~~System~~has had on our corporate stock prices. The conclusion of this evaluation, ~~and~~combined ~~designing~~with the lack of any reasonable updates from WES, ~~building~~has ~~and~~led ~~operating~~us ~~SWD~~to ~~wells~~cease current promotion of MultiGen, until such time that we are ~~used~~assured inby WES that such efforts are to the ~~oil~~benefit ~~and~~of ~~gas~~the ~~industry~~Company and our shareholders.

~~Design, Building and Operating SWD Wells~~Services

~~Company~~Blue ~~management~~Bench ~~has~~Class ~~spent~~II ~~the last two years working in North Dakota and Montana to identify potential~~ SWD ~~well sights,~~ in an effort to obtain operating and drilling permits for the most desirable of those locations for PWC. Currently we have state approval for the Cartwright Well location, and are looking for more sites. Management’s focus on strategic acquisitions and new site evaluations will be instrumental in the Bakken play and for additional markets in the future.Utah

~~Management~~Through ~~plans~~an onacquisition ~~replicating~~of ~~and~~all ~~improving~~of the ~~design~~ issued and ~~cash~~outstanding ~~flow~~membership interests of Pro Water Utah, the ~~Centerline~~Company acquired the Blue Bench Class II SWD ~~system~~well. The ~~and~~Blue Bench ~~building~~Class ~~additional~~II SWD ~~wells~~well is owned and operated by Pro Water Utah in ~~North~~Duchesne, ~~Dakota~~Utah and ~~Montana~~is ~~from~~one ~~their~~of ~~experience~~the atfew, ~~PWU~~available commercial methods for disposing Produced Water in that area. Pro Water Utah’s ~~facility~~Blue Bench Class II SWD well takes the Produced Water brought in from customers in the surrounding oil and ~~anticipates~~gas fields and converts that ~~each~~Produced ~~new~~Water ~~Centerline~~into ~~SWD~~processed ~~facility~~water, ~~will~~which ~~require~~can be ~~2-4~~reused ~~months~~when todrilling ~~begin~~for ~~generating~~oil ~~income~~and ~~after~~gas, ~~the~~or ~~SWD~~alternatively ~~well~~safely isinjected ~~complete~~into approved formations thousands of feet below potential ground water zones.

5The Blue Bench Class II SWD well resides on two five-acre parcels. With the exception of a few outlying buildings, the Blue Bench Class II SWD well has been completely re-designed to increase the capacity for production and allow the Blue Bench Class II SWD well to operate during the winter months. With the completion of the upgrades and automation, the redesigned Blue Bench Class II SWD well was originally capable of handling over 7,000 barrels of Produced Water per day. Efficiency and automation designs allow the Blue Bench Class II SWD well to operate with minimal labor while achieving maximum production results. While the Blue Bench Class II SWD previously operated at greater than expected capacity, current estimates have led us to believe that the overall well capacity is lower than expected, and therefore we are currently exploring additional new technologies to enhance the production capability and cut down on operating costs at the facility. This technology would also improve the oil water separation process, allowing for additional oil recovery.

Centerline ~~SWD~~Salt ~~System~~Water Disposal Wells in North Dakota

~~Our~~Through ~~proven~~our ~~dedication~~wholly toowned subsidiary ~~the~~ProWater ~~industry has created partnership opportunities and solid relationships with vendors~~Colorado, ~~customers,~~we ~~and~~had ~~potential~~planned ~~customers~~this inyear ~~Utah,~~to ~~North~~construct ~~Dakota~~three ~~and~~SWD ~~Montana~~wells ~~for~~utilizing the Centerline SWD ~~system~~System. ~~Reports~~ However, ~~from~~during the ~~United~~past ~~States Geological Survey (“USGS”) show that the Bakken Shale formation could hold more crude oil than the entire Middle East region~~year, ~~which~~we ~~could~~finished ~~produce~~construction ~~crude~~of ~~oil~~our ~~for~~Class ~~the~~II ~~next 20-35 years. The lack of~~ SWD well ~~locations~~in isCartwright, ~~currently~~North ~~one~~Dakota of (the “Cartwright ~~largest~~Well”) ~~roadblocks~~and ~~holding~~in ~~back~~Williston, ~~the~~North ~~number~~Dakota of(the ~~crude~~“Williston ~~oil~~Well”) ~~wells~~we ~~in this area. We~~ are ~~ready~~close to ~~capitalize on this opportunity utilizing PWC’s Centerline SWD systems by managing the building of the related salt-water disposal wells, and through strategic partners in the oil and gas industry~~completion.

~~According~~The toCartwright ~~the~~Well ~~Wall~~construction ~~Street~~has ~~Journal,~~been ~~the~~completed and ~~Bakken Shale formation~~ is ~~believed to contain billions of barrels of recoverable oil. Technological improvements~~ in ~~the~~partial ~~past two years have taken what was once a small~~operation, ~~marginally~~however ~~profitable~~we ~~field~~believe ~~and turned~~ it ~~into~~will ~~one~~be offully ~~the~~operational ~~fastest-growing oil-producing areas~~ in ~~the~~Fall Uof 2013.S. The ~~Bakken~~current ~~Shale~~data ~~has~~available ~~helped North Dakota oil production double in the past three years, surging~~ to 80us implies ~~million~~that ~~barrels~~this inwell ~~2009—tiny~~has ~~relative~~an toexcellent ~~the~~probability ~~more~~of ~~than~~being ~~seven~~able ~~billion barrels consumed by the U.S. every year, but enough~~ to ~~vault~~receive ~~the~~large ~~state~~volumes past Oklahoma and Louisiana to become the country's fourth-biggest oil producer, after Texas, Alaska and California. If current projections hold, North Dakota's oil production could pass Alaska's by the end of ~~the decade~~water.

~~Class~~The IIWilliston ~~SWD~~Well ~~wells~~has ~~are~~been drilled, the ~~preferred~~wellhead is ~~disposal~~completed, ~~system~~and in the ~~U.S.~~foundations, astruck ~~many~~offloads, ~~states~~and ~~are banning evaporation pits. In~~ the ~~state~~tank offarm ~~North~~have ~~Dakota,~~been ~~permitting~~installed. ~~for~~As ~~evaporation~~additional ~~pits~~financing is ~~not allowed. Produced Water is commonly shipped to SWD wells by truck~~secured, the orpump byfacility afor ~~limited~~the ~~number~~Williston ofWell ~~pipelines. Oil~~is ~~producers~~expected doto ~~not~~be ~~want~~delivered toin ~~deal~~the ~~with~~next ~~wastewater~~several ~~disposal~~months and ~~only~~is ~~build~~anticipated ~~disposal~~to ~~wells~~be ~~when~~in ~~commercial~~operation by ~~disposals~~the ~~are~~spring ~~not~~of ~~conveniently available~~2014. ~~This~~ isCurrent ~~where~~data ~~through our~~available ~~wholly owned subsidiary PWC, we can become a key partner~~ to ~~these~~us ~~oil~~implies ~~producers. PWC~~that ~~and~~this ~~its~~well ~~Centerline~~also ~~SWD~~has ~~Systems~~a ~~growth~~good ~~and~~probability ~~expansion~~of ~~plans~~being inable ~~the U.S. over the next two~~ to ~~five~~receive large ~~years~~volumes ~~will~~of ~~occur in Three Phases~~water.

InOperational Phase One, PWC expects to deliver one to two Centerline SWD Systems in North Dakota that could generate income by the end of 2012. In Phase Two, the next two to four additional Centerline SWD Systems are anticipated to be completed in 2013 in North Dakota and Montana. In Phase Three, we anticipate the leasing and operations of the Centerline SWD System, and the further use of PWC’s technology and design team to assist major oil and gas companies throughout the U.S.History

~~DynIX™~~Pro Water Utah

WeDES ~~have signed licensing agreements for Australia and Asia with World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd (“WES”). However, currently there are no definitive or pending agreements for DynIX™.~~Technology

~~MultiGen~~On April 23, 2012 we entered into a letter of intent with Dehydration & Environmental Systems, Inc. (“DES”) to test DES’s DryVac technology at the Blue Bench Class II SWD well. The letter of intent has lapsed, and no further advances have been made.

On August 27, 2010, we entered into a Technology Purchase Agreement with World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd, an Australian company (“WES”). In exchange for an investment in WES, we purchased certain technologies, including all intellectual property rights and pending patents of WES. Such patents and patent applications include patent number 20088237617 and patent application number 2010118129. Both patents relate to the water extraction and electricity generation units, referred to as MultiGen. Multiple Patent Cooperation Treaties have been filed in Canada, Mexico, Nigeria, South Africa and the United States.5

~~Effective~~Blue ~~September~~Bench 1,II 2011, along with SET IP Holdings LLC, a Utah limited liability company, we entered into an amendment with WES to the aforementioned Technology Purchase Agreement (“Amendment to the TPA”). Pursuant to the terms of the Amendment to the TPA: (i) our option to purchase 3% of the capital stock of WES has been canceled; (ii) WES’ warrant to purchase 333,333 shares of our common stock at a price of $5.25 per share has been canceled; (iii) WES’ $200,000 convertible secured promissory note issued by us (convertible at $5.25 per share of our common stock), and all security interests granted there under, has been canceled; (iv) our ownership of 12% of the capital stock of WES has been canceled; (v) our payment to WES upon certain terms of WES’ successful installation and sale of a MultiGen unit has been reduced to 250,000 shares of our common stock; (vi) the maximum share issuance by us to WES based on WES royalties paid to us for certain WES sales of MultiGen units has been reduced to 333,333 shares of our common stock; (vii) any shares of our common stock issued to WES pursuant to the Agreement, as amended, shall be restricted from transfer for one year from the date of issuance; (viii) our maximum royalty obligation to WES for our sales of MultiGen units has been reduced to $500,000; (ix) WES shall pay us a royalty of 10% of gross revenues for WES sales of MultiGen units; (x) WES and the Company shall split 75/25 certain fees paid to WES in connection with agency for sales of MultiGen units outside of Australia; and (xi) the parties have covenanted to use their best efforts in regards to maintaining distributor status for sourcing components for the MultiGen units.SWD

On ~~October~~July 177, ~~2011~~2010, we ~~shipped~~entered into the Pro ~~first~~Water ~~order~~acquisition agreement ~~for~~(the ~~its~~"Pro ~~high~~Water ~~efficiency~~Agreement") ~~MultiGen~~to ~~combined~~acquire ~~cooling~~100% of the membership interests of Pro Water Utah, ~~heating~~from ~~and~~its ~~power~~sole member, ~~plus~~Metropolitan ~~water~~Real ~~generation~~Estate, ~~systems~~LLC (~~CCHP~~the ~~+H20~~“Metropolitan”), to a ~~commercial~~New ~~facility~~York inlimited ~~Australia~~liability ~~for~~company. Metropolitan ais ~~retrofit~~an ~~construction~~entity ~~project~~controlled by Mr. ~~Subject~~Horst toGeicke, a ~~successful~~beneficial ~~outcome~~owner of the Company. Pro Water Utah’s sole business is its ownership and operation of the Blue Bench II SWD well and refinery in Duchesne, Utah. In exchange for ~~this~~the ~~first~~purchase ~~installation~~of the membership interest of Pro Water Utah, ~~coordinated~~we byassumed ~~WES~~all Pro Water Utah’s debts, ~~further~~1,333,333 ~~orders~~shares ~~are~~of our ~~expected~~restricted incommon ~~2012.~~stock ~~Upon~~were to be issued, and a convertible ~~successful~~secured ~~launch~~promissory note (the "Pro Water Note") was to be issued. The amount of the ~~MultiGen~~Pro Water Note was in ~~Australia~~the amount of $2,000,000, ~~SET~~at ~~Corp~~an ~~intends~~interest torate ~~promote~~of 5% per annum, payable quarterly over a period of one year commencing on the ~~MultiGen~~closing ~~throughout~~date of the ~~Americas~~Pro Water Agreement. In addition, the ~~starting~~Pro ~~with~~Water Note had a conversion feature, which at the ~~USA~~sole option of the holder, would inconvert ~~2012.~~the ~~The~~Pro ~~first~~Water ~~MultiGen~~Note isinto shares ~~currently~~of restricted ~~being~~common ~~installed~~stock inat a ~~government~~price ~~Education~~of ~~Institution~~$1.50 inper ~~NSW Australia~~share. The ItPro Water Note is ~~expected~~secured by all of the assets of Pro Water Utah. Subsequent to bethe inclosing ~~full~~of ~~production~~the byPro ~~September~~Water ~~2012~~Agreement, Pro Water Utah became our wholly-owned subsidiary.

6On July 12, 2010, the terms of the Pro Water Agreement were amended whereby the number of shares of common stock paid to Metropolitan was increased to 2,222,222 (from 1,333,333). In addition, the conversion rate of the Pro Water Note was also amended. Previously the Pro Water Note was to be converted at $1.50 per share, however the Pro Water Note was amended so that $1,600,000 of the Pro Water Note would be converted at $3.00 per share and $400,000 would be converted at $0.375 per share. The Pro Water Note was also amended to have the following payment schedule: i) $100,000 paid on or before September 30, 2010; ii) $200,000 paid on or before December 31, 2010; iii) $200,000 paid on or before March 31, 2011 and vi) the remaining amount of $1,500,000 with unpaid interest on or before June 30, 2011. The $100,000 payment due in September 2010, was paid in October of 2010.

~~Prior~~On January 14, 2011, the terms of the Pro Water Note were amended for a second time. As of the date of the second amendment, the unpaid principal amount was $1,880,000. Under the terms of the second amendment, the term of the Pro Water Note was extended for five (5) years and all accrued interest was forgiven. In addition, our payments were to be in sixty (60) monthly payments of $35,478 commencing January of 2011 and concluding December of 2015, subsequently extended to April 2016. All other terms, including conversion and interest rates have remained the same as in the first amendment to the Pro Water Note. The Company ~~Businesses~~accounted for the change in terms of the debt as an extinguishment of the debt due to the significant change in the repayment period.

~~Prior~~The toacquisition ~~our~~of ~~business~~Pro Water Utah was accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 Business Combinations. We determined for accounting and reporting purposes that Pro Water was the acquirer because of the ~~development~~significant holdings and influence of ~~sustainable~~Mr. ~~environmental~~Horst ~~technologies,~~Geicke before and after the ~~Company~~acquisition. As a result of the transaction, ~~under~~Mr. ~~prior~~Horst ~~management~~Geicke, ~~was~~individually and ~~involved~~through inentities ~~several~~of ~~business~~which ~~ventures~~he ~~including~~has ~~energy~~common ~~drinks,~~control ~~nutraceuticals,~~(the ~~and~~“Control ~~other~~Group”) ~~consumer,~~owned ~~retail~~in ~~and~~excess ~~commercial~~of ~~ventures,~~44% ~~all~~of issued and outstanding common stock of ~~which~~the ~~have~~Company ~~been~~on ~~abandoned~~a diluted basis.

~~Status~~As of ~~Publicly~~April ~~Announced~~12, ~~New~~2013, ~~Products~~Mr. Horst Geicke notified the Company that he was converting the Pro Water Note, due to lack of timely payments, into shares of restricted common stock. However, instead of converting the outstanding principal amount of $1,304,666 and ~~Services~~accrued interest amount of $28,951 due to Mr. Geicke according to the terms of the Pro Water Note, Mr. Geicke and the Company agreed to convert the principal and accrued interest due on the Pro Water Note into 10,258,589 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $0.13 per share.

~~See~~Because ~~above~~SWD wells are essential to the responsible processing of Produced Water from the oil and gas industry, we acquired Pro Water Utah to expand our water processing services for ~~discussion~~the disposal of Produced Water. Through the Blue Bench Class II SWD well in ~~principal~~Utah, ~~products~~we have established a customer base and ~~services~~are currently generating a positive monthly cash flow. Since January of 2011, business of Pro Water Utah’s Blue Bench Class II SWD well steadily increased, however, diminishing capacity in the current formation has resulted in a decline in sales. We are currently evaluating the financial needs to once again increase capacity and the related sales at the Blue Bench Class II SWD in Utah. While there are several key factors to obtaining new business, the ratio of available business per customer is based solely on the number of oil and gas wells the customer has within the serviceable radius of the injection well. As new oil and gas wells are developed within the serviceable radius of the Blue Bench Class II SWD well, the ratio of customers to percentage of business will increase.

~~Competition~~ProWater Colorado

~~PWU~~Our ~~has~~wholly ~~three~~owned ~~competitors~~subsidiary, ProWater Colorado, in ~~Utah.~~which ~~Water~~we ~~Disposal~~plan ~~Inc.~~to ~~(“WDI”)~~develop ~~has~~additional ~~two~~technologies ~~injection~~for ~~wells~~disposing ~~that~~of ~~are~~salt-water ~~located in Roosevelt, Utah and are approximately 24 miles further away~~ from ~~the primary~~ oil ~~producers~~and ingas ~~the~~wells ~~vicinity~~including ~~than~~technologies ~~our well. This is important~~ such as ~~the~~Centerline ~~trucking~~SWD ~~costs~~System, ~~are~~and ~~greater~~designing, ~~than~~building ~~the~~and ~~disposal~~operating ~~costs~~SWD ~~for~~wells ~~injecting~~that ~~the water. The closer you~~ are, ~~the~~used ~~lower~~in the ~~overall~~oil ~~disposal~~and ~~coast~~gas ~~will be~~industry. ~~The third disposal site is an evaporation pit one mile further than our facility.~~

~~PWC has multiple competitors in North Dakota; Zenith Produced Water has 2 injection wells that are north of Williston and currently taking 5-~~6,000 barrels between the 2 wells. There is another operator RMI that has 1 well operating and is currently building a second well. They are southeast of Williston and the first one is currently doing 10,000 BPD. Each SWD can service about 50-100 oil wells. Approximately 2,000 permits to drill new wells were issued last year with about the same number slated for this year. This leaves a large shortage of SWD’s to support all of the oil production currently and in the future.

~~DynIX™~~Centerline ~~currently~~SWD has direct competition from Ionics, GE Water, and EMITS Water Discharge Technology. Many of these competitors have established histories of operation and greater financial resources than the Company, enabling them to finance acquisitions and development opportunities, to pay higher prices for the same opportunities, and to develop and support their own operations. In addition, these companies have greater name recognition.System

~~MultiGen~~Our ~~Technology~~proven isdedication to the ~~first~~industry ofhas ~~its~~created partnership ~~kind~~opportunities and ~~does~~solid ~~not~~relationships ~~currently~~with ~~have~~vendors, ~~any~~customers, ~~competition.~~and Aspotential ~~far~~customers asin ~~similar~~Utah ~~types~~and ofNorth ~~green~~Dakota ~~technology~~for the ~~that~~Centerline ~~would~~SWD beSystem. Reports ~~similar~~from ~~would~~the beUnited ~~solar~~States ~~panels~~Geological orSurvey ~~windmills.~~(“USGS”) ~~Although~~show ~~both~~that ofthe ~~these~~Bakken Shale ~~systems~~formation ~~produce~~could ~~electrical~~hold ~~power~~more ~~they~~crude dooil ~~not~~than ~~provide~~ the ~~additional~~entire ~~benefits~~Middle ofEast ~~producing~~region, ~~free~~which ~~heating~~could ~~or air conditioning nor do they~~ produce ~~free~~crude ~~water~~oil asfor anthe ~~additional~~next ~~byproduct~~20-35 years. The ~~MultiGen~~lack ~~provides~~of ~~numerous~~SWD ~~eco-tech~~well ~~solutions~~locations that ~~bridge~~previously ~~the~~served ~~gap~~as ~~between~~one ~~existing~~of ~~energy inefficient buildings and~~ the ~~sustainable~~largest ~~development~~roadblocks ~~and~~holding ~~design~~back ~~needs~~the number of ~~tomorrow. By~~crude ~~providing~~oil awells ~~complete~~in ~~sustainable~~this ~~solution,~~area ~~every~~has ~~MultiGen~~greatly 65diminished isover ~~able~~the tolast ~~provide~~year. As ~~65kWh~~a ~~of electricity~~result, upthe tocompany ~~2,000~~is ~~liters~~evaluating ofcurrent demands ~~water per day~~ and ~~provide~~will ~~supplemental~~hold ~~air~~off ~~conditioning~~on ~~and heating. MultiGen is able to produce energy at half~~ the ~~price~~development of ~~the~~a ~~grid,~~third ~~while~~disposal ~~saving~~well upuntil tosuch ~~400~~time ~~tons~~that ofthe ~~carbon~~need ~~each year. With an average ROI of 20 years for solar, MultiGen has an ROI of 5 years and~~ is ~~78% more efficient than a comparable solar panel installation~~ascertained.

~~WES~~According ~~represents~~to ~~two~~the ~~product~~Wall ~~lines~~Street ofJournal, the ~~Company.~~Bakken Shale ~~The~~formation ~~first~~ is ~~the~~believed ~~DynIX~~to ~~system~~contain ~~for~~billions ~~cleaning~~of ~~Produced~~barrels ~~Water~~of ~~from~~recoverable ~~Coal~~oil. Technological ~~Bed~~improvements ~~Methane~~in ~~CBM~~the orpast two ~~Coal~~years ~~Seam~~have ~~Gas~~taken ~~CSG~~what ~~wells~~was asonce ~~they~~a ~~call them in Australia. Ionics~~small, GEmarginally ~~Water,~~profitable field and ~~EMIT~~turned ~~Water~~it ~~Discharge~~into ~~Technology~~one ~~would~~of be the ~~same~~fastest-growing ~~competitors~~oil-producing areas in ~~Au as we sell against here in~~ the USU.S. The ~~Many~~Bakken ofShale ~~these~~has ~~competitors~~helped ~~have~~North ~~established~~Dakota ~~histories~~oil ofproduction ~~operation~~double ~~and~~in ~~greater~~the ~~financial~~past ~~resources~~three ~~than the Company~~years, ~~enabling~~surging ~~them~~ to 80 ~~finance~~million ~~acquisitions~~barrels ~~and~~in ~~development~~2009—tiny ~~opportunities,~~relative to ~~pay higher prices for~~ the ~~same~~more ~~opportunities,~~than ~~and~~seven tobillion ~~develop~~barrels ~~and~~consumed ~~support~~by ~~their~~the ~~own operations~~U.S. Inevery ~~addition~~year, ~~many~~but ofenough to ~~these~~vault ~~companies have greater name recognition. As far as~~ the ~~MultiGen~~state ~~technology~~past ~~goes~~Oklahoma itand isLouisiana soto ~~new~~become ~~that there are no direct competitors yet as~~ the ~~product~~country's isfourth-biggest ~~just~~oil ~~being~~producer, ~~released.~~after AsTexas, ~~far~~Alaska asand ~~similar types of green technology that would be similar would be solar panels or windmills~~California. If ~~Although~~current ~~both~~projections ofhold, ~~these~~North ~~systems~~Dakota's ~~produce~~oil ~~electrical~~production ~~power~~could ~~they~~pass doAlaska's ~~not~~by ~~provide~~ the ~~additional~~end ~~benefits~~ of ~~producing~~the ~~free heating or air conditioning nor do they produce free water as an additional byproduct~~decade.

7Class II SWD wells are the preferred disposal system in the U.S., as many states are banning evaporation pits. In the state of North Dakota, permitting for evaporation pits is not allowed. Produced Water is commonly shipped to SWD wells by truck, or by a limited number of pipelines. Oil producers do not want to deal with wastewater disposal and only build disposal wells when commercial disposals are not conveniently available. Therefore, through our wholly owned subsidiary ProWater Colorado, we can become a key partner to these oil producers.

~~Intellectual~~We ~~Property~~have set out a three phase approach for the growth and success of the Centerline SWD System.This year, in phase one, ProWater Colorado delivered one Centerline SWD System in North Dakota to our Cartwright Well. The Cartwright Well began generating income in November 2012. With additional financing, ProWater Colorado is anticipated to deliver another Centerline SWD facility to our Williston Well, which is anticipated to come online in spring of 2014. The lack of SWD well locations that previously served as one of the largest roadblocks holding back the number of crude oil wells in this area has greatly diminished over the last year. As a result, the previous plan outlined in our last 10-K for phase two in which we anticipated completing an additional three to four Centerline SWD Systems in 2014 in North Dakota and Montana has been put on hold. The planned phase three, in which we anticipated the leasing and operations of the Centerline SWD System, and the further use of ProWater Colorado’s technology and design team to assist major oil and gas companies throughout the U.S., however, will continue to move forward.

~~We own the DynIX™ wastewater technology protected by US patent 8~~Design,~~168,068~~ Building and ~~proprietary~~Operating ~~know~~SWD ~~how which is expected to form the basis for further patents filings based on the fundamentals in the issued patent.~~Wells

We have ~~two~~ ~~other~~been ~~pending~~working ~~patents~~in ~~for~~Utah, ~~the~~North ~~MultiGen~~Dakota and ~~Technology~~Montana into ~~Australia,~~identify ~~20088237617~~potential ~~and~~SWD ~~2010228129~~well sights, in ~~addition~~an effort to ~~multiple~~obtain ~~Patent~~operating ~~Cooperation~~and ~~Treaties~~drilling ~~which~~permits ~~have~~for ~~been~~the ~~filed~~most indesirable of ~~Canada,~~those ~~Mexico,~~locations ~~Nigeria~~for expansion. Currently, ~~South~~our ~~Africa~~focus is on strategic acquisitions and new site evaluations in the Bakken formation in the United States, and for additional markets in the future.

~~Government~~Termination ~~Approval~~of Project Finance Transaction

~~PWU~~On ~~received~~September a17, ~~permit~~2012, ~~for passing~~through aProWater ~~Mechanical~~Colorado, we ~~Integrity~~entered ~~Test~~into an asset purchase agreement, and amendment thereto on October 23, 2012 (collectively the “~~MIT~~APA”) ~~test~~, ~~done~~ contingent byon shareholder approval, the ~~state~~assumption of ~~Utah.~~certain ~~This~~debts ~~permit~~by ~~is valid~~PWCO, ~~for five~~LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (5“PWCO”) ~~years.~~, Inand ~~addition~~ProWater toColorado’s contribution of the ~~MIT,~~assets weof dothe ~~monthly~~Cartwright ~~reporting~~Well, ofthe ~~all~~Williston ~~injection~~Well, ~~numbers~~and toour Centerline ~~the~~SWD ~~Utah~~Technology ~~Department~~(the ofCartwright ~~Oil~~Well, ~~Gas~~the Williston Well, and ~~Mining~~the (Centerline SWD System shall collectively be referred to as the “~~UDOGM~~Projects”) to PWCO in exchange for 35% ownership in PWCO.

~~The~~By ~~Cartwright~~us ~~Well~~entering isinto ~~currently~~the ~~permitted~~APA as part of a series of transactions, collectively referred to as the “Project Finance Transaction”, the Company, along with the other members of PWCO, were leveraging PWCO’s $2,000,000 revolving line of credit, personally guaranteed by Robert Glaser and Keith Morlock, two officers and directors of the ~~bond~~Company, ~~has~~including ~~been~~the ~~placed~~anticipated project finance investment of $6,000,000 by Cancen Oil Processors, Inc., ~~The~~a ~~state~~corporation formed under the laws of ~~North~~Alberta, ~~Dakota~~Canada ~~has~~(“Cancen ~~approved~~Private ~~all~~Co.”) ~~plans~~to ~~for~~complete the ~~construction~~Projects. Therefore, we would have had the ability to finish the building and development of the ~~facility~~Projects without diluting our shareholders, and at the ~~paperwork~~same istime anhaving ~~ongoing~~a ~~providing~~substantial interest in PWCO. On December 21, 2012, at our annual meeting of the ~~state~~shareholders ~~with~~for ~~Sundry~~the ~~reports~~fiscal year asended March 31, 2012, the ~~process~~shareholders ~~continues~~approved the APA, and the Project Finance Transaction.

However, as of April 12, 2013, the Company, ~~MultiGen~~Cancen ~~Technology~~Private ~~has~~Co., noBridgewell ~~government~~Worldwide ~~permits~~Limited ~~required~~(“Bridgewell”), ~~other~~Keith ~~than~~Morlock ~~standard~~(“Morlock”) ~~building~~and Robert Glaser (“Glaser”), have agreed to rescind the APA, and ~~electrical~~make ~~permits~~null and void any and all documentation associated with the Project Finance Transaction (such documentation shall be referred to herein as the “JV Documentation”). However, irrespective of the fact that ~~would~~the Project Finance Transaction was never consummated, the following steps have been taken, first, all of the assets and liabilities of ProWater Colorado that were transferred to PWCO pursuant to the APA were returned in full to ProWater Colorado, second, PWCO is in the process of being wound up and dissolved and all membership interests of PWCO cancelled, and lastly, the Company assumed the $2,000,000 loan from Bridgewell, as an Amended and Restated Revolving Note Agreement. The material terms of the Amended and Restated Revolving Note Agreement included the following; a) the principal amount shall be ~~required~~increased ~~for~~to ~~industrial~~$2,300,000, plus ~~electric~~5% interest; b) the personal guarantees of Morlock and ~~air~~Glaser ~~conditioning~~shall ~~installations~~be terminated, and in exchange, the ProWater shall grant a first priority security interest to Bridgewell in the Cartwright Well; and lastly, c) upon the mutual consent of the Company and Bridgewell, any outstanding principal and interest may be converted at any time, into common stock of the Company.

~~Employees~~7

AsOn ofApril ~~March~~30, 312013, ~~2012~~due to non-payment, Bridgewell wenotified ~~have seven~~us ~~(7)~~that ~~full~~they ~~time~~desired to convert the Amended and noRestated ~~part~~Revolving ~~time~~Loan ~~employees~~Agreement into 18,153,846 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $0.13 Weper ~~have two~~share, ~~(2)~~making ~~part~~the ~~time~~Amended ~~consultants~~and ~~that~~Restated ~~assist~~Revolving ~~with~~Loan ~~billing~~Agreement paid in full, and of ~~accounting~~no further effect. We agreed to the conversion, and issued 18,153,846 shares to Bridgewell.

~~ITEM~~As 2of March 31, 2013, the $6. ~~PROPERTIES~~0 million in capital which was anticipated to be raised for the Project Finance Transaction from Cancen Private Co., or another qualified investor, had not yet been funded. Thus, the accounting method SET Corp expected after the funding of the Project Finance Transaction would have been accounted for under the equity method as SET Corp would have held a 35% ownership in PWCO and have significant influence over that entity. However, because such funding had not been raised, the assets, liabilities, and the operating results of PWCO have been consolidated into the financial statements as the transaction was never consummated and the majority of the liability and benefit always remained with SET Corp.

~~We rent office space to house our corporate operations of approximately 4,330 square feet in Upland, California for approximately $4,763 per month.~~DynIX™

We ~~operate~~have ~~the~~signed ~~Blue~~licensing ~~Bench~~agreements ~~Class~~for IIAustralia and ~~SWD~~Asia ~~well~~with onWES. However, ~~approximately~~currently 10there ~~acres~~are no definitive or pending agreements for DynIX™, and with the lack of ~~owned~~reasonable ~~property~~updates infrom ~~Duchesne~~WES, ~~Utah~~we are currently evaluating our relationship with WES.

~~We have a surface lease for the Cartwright Well for approximately 10 acres in Cartwright, ND.~~MultiGen

~~ITEM~~On 3August 27, 2010, we entered into a Technology Purchase Agreement with WES. ~~LEGAL~~ In ~~PROCEEDINGS~~exchange for an investment in WES, we purchased certain technologies, including all intellectual property rights and pending patents of WES. Such patents and patent applications include patent number 20088237617 and patent application number 2010118129. Both patents relate to the water extraction and electricity generation units, referred to as MultiGen. Multiple Patent Cooperation Treaties have been filed in Canada, Mexico, Nigeria, South Africa and the United States.

OnEffective ~~April~~September 271, ~~2012~~2011, aalong ~~Complaint~~with ~~was~~SET IP ~~filed~~Holdings ~~against~~LLC, ~~the~~a ~~Company~~Utah bylimited aliability ~~previous consultant~~company, ~~Shani~~we ~~Investments~~entered ~~Inc.,~~into inan amendment with WES to the ~~Orange~~aforementioned ~~County~~Technology ~~Superior~~Purchase Agreement ~~Court~~(“Amendment to the TPA”). ~~The~~Pursuant ~~main~~to ~~contention~~the terms of the ~~Complaint~~Amendment isto ~~that~~the ~~there~~TPA: ~~was an~~(i) ~~alleged breach~~our option to purchase 3% of the capital stock of WES has been canceled; (ii) WES’ warrant to purchase 333,333 shares of our common stock at a ~~consulting~~price ~~agreement~~of ~~that~~$5.25 ~~was~~per ~~entered~~share ~~into~~has bybeen ~~the~~canceled; ~~Company~~(iii) ~~and~~WES’ ~~the~~$200,000 ~~consultant~~convertible insecured ~~which~~promissory ~~the~~note ~~plaintiff~~issued ~~claims~~by tous ~~have~~(convertible at ~~damages~~$5. We25 ~~have~~per ~~hired~~share aof ~~highly~~our ~~experienced~~common ~~litigation~~stock), ~~attorney~~and ~~who~~all onsecurity ~~June~~interests 12granted there under, ~~2012~~has ~~filed~~been acanceled; ~~Motion~~(iv) our ownership of 12% of the capital stock of WES has been canceled; (v) our payment to ~~Strike~~WES upon certain terms of WES’ successful installation and sale of a ~~Demurrer. The~~MultiGen ~~Motion~~unit has been reduced to ~~Strike~~250,000 ~~was~~shares ~~filed~~of toour ~~ask~~common stock; (vi) the ~~court~~maximum share issuance by us to ~~remove~~WES based ~~inapplicable~~on ~~and~~WES ~~superfluous~~royalties ~~prayers~~paid ~~and~~to ~~the~~us ~~Demurrer~~for ~~was~~certain ~~filed~~WES sales of MultiGen units has been reduced to ~~assert~~333,333 ~~that~~shares ~~the~~of ~~Plaintiff~~our ~~lacked~~common ~~capacity~~stock; (vii) any shares of our common stock issued to ~~assert~~WES pursuant to the ~~causes~~Agreement, ofas ~~action~~amended, ~~and~~shall ~~that~~be restricted from transfer for one year from the ~~causes~~date of ~~action~~issuance; ~~failed~~(viii) our maximum royalty obligation to ~~state~~WES ~~facts~~for ~~sufficient~~our sales of MultiGen units has been reduced to ~~constitute~~$500,000; (ix) WES shall pay us a royalty of 10% of gross revenues for WES sales of MultiGen units; (x) WES and the ~~causes~~Company shall split 75/25 certain fees paid to WES in connection with agency for sales of ~~action~~MultiGen units outside of Australia; and (xi) the parties have covenanted to use their best efforts in regards to maintaining distributor status for sourcing components for the MultiGen units.

~~ITEM~~On 4October 17, 2011, we shipped the first order for its high efficiency MultiGen combined cooling, heating and power, plus water generation systems (CCHP +H20) to a commercial facility in Australia for a retrofit construction project. ~~MINE~~ ~~SAFETY~~Subject ~~DISCLOSURES~~to a successful outcome of the first installation, coordinated by WES, further orders were expected in 2012. Due in part to delays on behalf of a key supplier, designated by WES, WES was unfortunately unable to complete installation of the first MultiGen in the time frame they originally provided. These extended delays directly resulted in SET Corp’s, intention to promote the MultiGen throughout the Americas, starting with the USA, in 2012, to be delayed indefinitely.

While the Capstone generator was successfully commissioned on February 2, 2013 and was anticipated to be put into complete 24-hour operation in March 2013, we have been unable to obtain satisfactory project updates from WES. This ~~item~~first isinstallation ~~not~~was ~~applicable~~done in conjunction with the Queensland Government and their relationship with the TAFE School.

~~PART~~We IIhave carefully evaluated the delays in getting the first MultGen to market, the effects that such delays have had on the value of such assets and WES’s inability to fulfill previous sales projections, combined with the direct effect this has had on our corporate stock prices. The conclusion of this evaluation, combined with the lack of any reasonable updates from WES, has led us to cease current promotion of MultiGen, until such time that we are assured that such efforts are to the benefit of the Company and our shareholders.

~~ITEM~~We 5remain hopeful that this first project will serve as the basis for future opportunities to do additional government projects in Australia. ~~MARKET~~ ~~FOR~~Successful ~~REGISTRANT’S~~production ~~COMMON~~results ~~EQUITY~~of the current installation, ~~RELATED~~combined ~~STOCKHOLDER~~with ~~MATTERS~~the ~~AND~~necessary ~~ISSUER~~updates ~~PURCHASES~~from OFWES, ~~EQUITY~~would ~~SECURITIES~~allow us to show customers the MultiGen in an actual operating environment, with real-time monitoring of all outputs including electricity, heat, air conditioning and water production.

~~Market Information~~8

~~Our Common~~Prior ~~Stock~~Company ~~currently is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “SETS”. The following tables set forth the high and low bid information for the Common Stock for each quarter within the last two fiscal years:~~Businesses

8Prior to our business of the development of sustainable environmental technologies, the Company, under prior management, was involved in several business ventures and other consumer, retail and commercial ventures, all of which have been abandoned.

~~QUARTERLY~~Status ~~COMMON~~of ~~STOCK~~Publicly ~~PRICE~~Announced ~~RANGES~~New Products and Services

Quarter Ended	High		Low
June 30, 2010	$	1.80	$	0.45
September 30, 2010	$	1.35	$	0.45
December 31, 2010	$	0.90	$	0.45
March 31, 2011	$	0.75	$	0.60
June 30, 2011	$	2.10	$	0.75
September 30, 2011	$	1.80	$	0.75
December 31, 2011	$	3.00	$	1.05
March 31, 2012	$	2.14	$	1.17

See above for discussion in principal products and services.

~~These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.~~Competition

~~Holders~~Pro Water Utah has three competitors in Utah. Water Disposal Inc. (“WDI”) has two injection wells that are located in Roosevelt, Utah and are approximately 24 miles further away from the primary oil producers in the vicinity than our well. This is important, as the trucking costs are greater than the disposal costs for injecting the water. The closer you are, the lower the overall disposal coast will be. The third disposal site is an evaporation pit one mile further than our facility.

~~There~~ProWater Colorado has multiple competitors in North Dakota. Each SWD well can service about 25-50 oil wells. Approximately 2,000 permits to drill new wells were ~~approximately~~issued ~~264~~last ~~holders~~year ofwith ~~record~~about ofthe ~~our~~same ~~Common~~number ~~Stock~~slated asfor this year. The current number of ~~June~~new 29SWD wells has momentarily outpaced local need, ~~2012~~with the result of reduced business and a decline in the price per barrel that we can charge for the processing of Produced Water.

~~Dividends~~DynIX™ currently has direct competition from Ionics, GE Water, and EMITS Water Discharge Technology. Many of these competitors have established histories of operation and greater financial resources than the Company, enabling them to finance acquisitions and development opportunities, to pay higher prices for the same opportunities, and to develop and support their own operations. In addition, these companies have greater name recognition.

WeWhile dowe ~~not~~believe ~~anticipate~~that DynIX™ ~~paying~~provides ~~dividends~~an inefficient environmental solution to the ~~foreseeable~~cleaning ~~future. There~~of ~~are~~Coal nobed methane ~~restrictions~~Water, oncurrent ~~our~~natural ~~present~~gas prices, ~~ability~~as towell ~~pay~~as ~~dividends~~new regulations related to ~~shareholders~~the ofsurface ~~its~~discharge ~~Common~~of ~~Stock,~~the ~~other~~related ~~than~~water ~~those~~have ~~prescribed~~minimized byany ~~California~~available ~~law~~sale opportunities.

~~Securities~~MultiGen ~~authorized~~technology is the first of its kind and does not currently have any competition. As far as similar types of green technology that would be similar would be solar panels or windmills. Although both of these systems produce electrical power they do not provide the additional benefits of producing free heating or air conditioning nor do they produce free water as an additional byproduct. MultiGen provides numerous eco-tech solutions that bridge the gap between existing energy inefficient buildings and the sustainable development and design needs of tomorrow. By providing a complete sustainable solution, every MultiGen is able to provide 65kWh of electricity, up to 2,000 liters of water per day and provide supplemental air conditioning and heating. MultiGen is able to produce energy at half the price of the grid, while saving up to 400 tons of carbon each year. With an average ROI of 20 years for ~~issuance~~solar, ~~under~~MultiGen ~~equity~~has ~~compensation~~an ~~plans~~ROI of 5 years and is 78% more efficient than a comparable solar panel installation.

InWES ~~order~~represents totwo ~~compensate~~of our ~~officers,~~product ~~directors,~~lines. ~~employees~~The ~~and/~~first is the DynIX system for cleaning Produced Water from Coal Bed Methane CBM or ~~consultants~~Coal Seam Gas CSG wells as they call them in Australia. Ionics, ~~our~~GE ~~Board~~Water, and ~~stockholders~~EMIT ~~adopted~~Water Discharge Technology would be the same ~~2006~~competitors ~~Incentive~~in Australia as we sell against here in the US. Many of these competitors have established histories of operation and ~~Non-Statutory~~greater ~~Stock~~financial ~~Option~~resources ~~Plan~~than (the ~~“2006~~Company, ~~Plan”)~~enabling them to finance acquisitions and development opportunities, to pay higher prices for the ~~2007~~same ~~Incentive~~opportunities, and ~~Non-Statutory~~to ~~Stock~~develop ~~Option~~and ~~Plan~~support ~~(“2007~~their ~~Plan”)~~own operations. In addition, ~~and~~many of these companies have greater name recognition. As far as the ~~2010~~MultiGen ~~Incentive~~technology ~~and~~goes ~~Non-Statutory~~it ~~Stock~~is ~~Option~~so ~~Plan~~new ~~(“2010~~that ~~Plan”)~~there are no direct competitors yet as the product is just being released. As far as similar types of green technology that would be similar would be solar panels or windmills. Although both of these systems produce electrical power they do not provide the additional benefits of producing free heating or air conditioning nor do they produce free water as an additional byproduct.

~~The~~Currently ~~2006~~we ~~Plan~~have ~~has~~ceased aall ~~total~~current promotions of ~~666~~MultiGen,~~667~~ ~~shares~~until such ~~reserved~~time ~~for~~that ~~issuance,~~we ~~the~~are ~~2007~~assured ~~Plan~~by ~~has a total of 400~~WES,~~000~~ ~~shares~~that ~~reserved~~such ~~for~~efforts ~~issuance,~~are ~~and~~to the ~~2010~~benefit ~~Plan has a total~~ of ~~1,333,333~~both ~~shares~~the ~~reserved~~Company ~~for~~and ~~issuance~~our shareholders.

AsIntellectual ~~of the end of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we have issued the following stock options and shares under the Plans:~~Property

~~Equity Compensation Plan Information~~Trademarks

Plan category	Number of securities remaining to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2006 Plan		16,667	$	0.90		118,897
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2007 Plan		26,667	$	0.90		31,367
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2010 Plan		821,666	$	0.78		424,712
Equity compensation not pursuant to a plan		-	$	-		-
Total		865,000	$	0.77		574,976

We own the DynIX™ registered trademark, Registration Number 4,286,533, and have two trademark applications pending; a word mark for Centerline, Application Number 85/764,065, and a word mark for ProWater, Application Number 85/764,068.

9Patents

~~Recent~~We ~~Sales~~own ofthe ~~Unregistered~~DynIX™ ~~Securities~~wastewater technology protected by US Patent Number 8,168,068 and the proprietary know how which is expected to form the basis for further patents filings based on the fundamentals in the issued patent.

~~None~~9

~~ITEM~~We ~~6. SELECTED~~have two ~~FINANCIAL~~other ~~DATA~~pending patents for the MultiGen Technology in Australia, 20088237617 and 2010228129 in addition to multiple applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, which have been filed in Canada, Mexico, Nigeria, South Africa and the United States.

~~This~~Government ~~item~~Approval isand ~~not~~Compliance ~~applicable.~~with Environmental Laws

~~ITEM~~Our 7operations are subject to the United States federal, state and local laws and regulations regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to health and safety or the protection of the environment. ~~MANAGEMENT’S~~ ~~DISCUSSION~~Additional ~~AND~~laws ~~ANALYSIS~~and OFregulations, ~~FINANCIAL~~or ~~CONDITION~~changes ~~AND~~in ~~RESULTS~~the OFinterpretations ~~OPERATIONS~~of existing laws and regulations, that affect our business and operations may be adopted, which may in turn impact our financial condition. The following is a summary of the more significant existing health, safety and environmental laws and regulations to which our operations are subject.

InHazardous ~~addition~~Substances ~~to historical information, you should read the following discussion~~ and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with "Selected Financial Data" and our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those presented under "Risk Factors" in our prior SEC filings and elsewhere in this Annual Report.Waste

~~For~~The United States Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended, referred to as “CERCLA” or the “Superfund” law, and comparable state laws, impose liability without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct on certain defined persons, including current and prior owners or operators of a ~~full~~site ~~discussion~~where a release of ~~our~~hazardous ~~business~~substances ~~please~~occurred ~~see~~and ~~Item~~entities that 1disposed ~~which~~or ~~begins~~arranged onfor Pgthe disposal of the hazardous substances found at the site. 2Under CERCLA, these “responsible persons” may be liable for the costs of ~~this~~cleaning ~~Report~~up the hazardous substances, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. Although we use operating and disposal practices that are standard in the industry, hydrocarbons or other wastes may have been released at properties owned or leased by us now or in the past, or at other locations where these hydrocarbons and wastes were taken for treatment or disposal. Under CERCLA, and analogous state laws, we could be required to clean up contaminated property (including contaminated groundwater), or to perform remedial activities to prevent future contamination.

~~Results~~Occupational ofSafety ~~Operations~~and ~~for~~Health ~~the~~Act ~~Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011~~

~~The~~We ~~following~~are ~~table~~subject ~~summarizes~~to the ~~results~~requirements of ~~our~~the ~~continuing~~United States ~~operations~~Occupational ~~amounts~~Safety ~~for~~and Health Act, as amended, or “OSHA,” and comparable state laws that regulate the ~~periods~~protection of employee health and ~~dates~~safety. ~~shown:~~ OSHA’s hazard communication standard requires that information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations be maintained and provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens.

	For the Year Ended March 31,
	2012		2011
Combined Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue	$	4,269,529	$	2,617,400
Cost of revenue		1,605,247		1,020,205
Operating expenses		2,123,260		1,351,897
Operating income		541,022		245,298
Other income (expense)		529,462		(674,638	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations		1,070,484		(429,340	)
Net income (loss)	$	2,254,920	$	(355,439	)

SWD Wells

~~Revenues~~We ~~increased~~operate ~~$1,652,129~~SWD wells orthat ~~63%,~~are ~~for~~subject ~~the~~to ~~year~~United ~~ended~~States ~~March~~Clean 31Water Act, ~~2012~~as ~~compared~~amended, toor ~~the~~“CWA”, ~~period of~~ the ~~prior~~Safe ~~year~~Drinking ~~presented.~~Water ~~This~~Act, ~~increase~~or “SWDA,” ~~resulted~~and ~~from~~state aand ~~54%~~local ~~increase~~laws inand ~~revenue~~regulations, ~~from~~including ~~its~~those ~~major~~established ~~customer~~by ~~that~~the ~~accounted~~Underground ~~for~~Injection Control ~~81%~~Program of ~~revenue~~the ~~compared~~United toStates ~~86%~~Environmental ~~for~~Protection ~~the~~Agency, ~~prior~~or ~~period~~“EPA,” ~~presented.~~which ~~The~~establishes ~~increase~~the inminimum program ~~revenue~~requirements isincluding ~~due~~for topermitting, ~~the~~testing, ~~complete~~monitoring, ~~redesign~~record keeping and ~~upgrade~~reporting of ~~the Blue~~injection ~~Bench~~well activities. ~~Class~~All IIof ~~SWD and~~our ~~management’s~~salt-water ~~decision~~disposal towells ~~implement~~are ~~temporary~~located ~~receiving~~in ~~facilities~~Utah ~~during~~and ~~the~~North ~~redesign process~~Dakota. ByRegulations ~~guaranteeing~~in ~~customers~~Utah ~~that~~and ~~they~~North ~~would~~Dakota require ~~receive~~us ~~uninterrupted~~to ~~service,~~obtain ~~the~~a ~~temporary~~permit ~~receiving~~to ~~facilities~~operate ~~allowed~~each ~~management~~of toour ~~secure~~SWD ~~customers~~in ~~several~~those ~~months~~states. inThese ~~advance~~regulatory ofagencies have the ~~upgrade~~general authority ~~completions. Furthermore~~to bysuspend ~~providing~~or ~~customers~~modify ~~with~~one ~~exceptional~~or ~~customer~~more ~~service~~of ~~and~~these ~~competitive~~permits ~~pricing~~if ~~that~~continued ~~does~~operation ~~not~~of ~~fluctuate~~one ~~significantly,~~of ~~management~~our ~~has~~underground ~~created~~injection awells is ~~marketing~~likely ~~edge~~to ~~that~~result ~~separates~~in ~~the Blue~~pollution ~~Bench~~of ~~Class~~freshwater, IIsubstantial ~~SWD from~~violation ~~that~~ of ~~local~~permit ~~competition. Due~~conditions toor ~~improvements~~applicable ~~made~~rules, ~~subsequent~~or leaks to the environment. Any leakage from the ~~prior~~subsurface ~~period~~portions ~~presented,~~of the injection ~~well~~wells iscould ~~automated~~cause ~~and~~degradation ~~fully~~of ~~winterized. The~~fresh ~~Blue~~groundwater resources, ~~Bench~~potentially ~~Class~~resulting IIin ~~SWD well~~cancellation ~~not~~of ~~only~~operations ~~has~~of ~~additional~~a ~~capacity~~well, ~~but~~issuance ~~its~~of ~~increased~~fines ~~efficiency~~and ~~for~~penalties ~~processing~~from ~~produced water~~governmental agencies, ~~allows~~incurrence ~~four~~of ~~trucks~~expenditures tofor ~~simultaneously~~remediation ~~unload. This~~of ~~greatly~~the ~~reduces~~affected ~~wait~~resource ~~times~~ and ~~ultimately~~imposition ~~results~~of inliability ~~the~~by ~~Company~~third ~~and~~parties for ~~our~~property ~~customers~~damages ~~saving both time~~ and ~~money~~personal injuries.

~~Cost~~Government ofPermitting revenue increased $585,042 or 57%, for the year ended March 31, 2012 compared to the prior period presented. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenue was 38% compared to 39% in the prior period presented. Items included within cost of revenues represent labor, depreciation and amortization, equipment rental, supplies, utilities, repair and maintenance. Principal factors contributing to the increase in cost of revenue included additional depreciation due to improvements made to the injection well subsequent to the prior comparable period and an increase in variable expenditures such as utilities due to the increased barrels produced. Payroll related costs are primarily fixed due to the minimal staffing required to monitor the facility and thus do not fluctuate significantly from period to period.Approval

~~Total~~Pro ~~operating~~Water ~~expenses~~Utah ~~increased~~received ~~$771,363~~a orpermit ~~57%~~ for passing a ~~the~~Mechanical ~~year~~Integrity ~~ended~~Test ~~March~~(“MIT”) 31test, done ~~2012~~by ~~compared to~~ the ~~prior~~state ~~period~~of ~~presented due to the increased operations~~Utah. ~~Operating~~This ~~expenses~~permit ~~include~~is valid ~~management~~for five ~~and administrative personnel costs~~ (~~including non-cash stock-based compensation~~5)~~, corporate office costs, accounting fees, depreciation and amortization, legal expense, information systems expense, product marketing, sales expense and research and development expenses~~ years. ~~Increased~~ In ~~expenditures~~addition ~~included~~to ~~approximately~~the ~~$641~~MIT,~~000~~ ~~for~~we ~~stock~~do ~~based~~monthly ~~compensation,~~reporting ~~$247,000~~of inall ~~professional~~injection ~~fees,~~numbers ~~$399,000~~to inthe ~~salaries~~Utah ~~and~~Department ~~wages,~~of ~~$187~~Oil,~~000~~ ~~in consulting agreements~~Gas, and ~~general~~Mining ~~corporate expenditures~~(“UDOGM”). ~~In addition, research and development expenses of approximately $125,000 in 2012 represented costs incurred in our development of our initial MultiGen system.~~

10The Cartwright Well was brought online in November of 2012, and is currently permitted and bonded. The Williston Well, which is not completed, is anticipated to be completed in Spring of 2014, and is currently permitted and bonded. Additionally, we will provide the state of North Dakota with ongoing reports as required for both wells.

Total other income was $529,462 for the for the year ended March 31, 2012 compared to an expense of $674,638 for the prior period presented due to an increase in debt settlement negotiations. Other income (expense) includes interest income, interest expense, change in fair value of derivative liability, and gain on settlement of payables and accrued liabilities. The income during the current period was related to approximately $625,000 of write-offs related to a note payable and the related accrued interest, as well as approximately $81,000 for the write-off of certain accounts payable, offset by of amortization expense of $140,000 related to the beneficial conversion feature recorded in connection with the $2.0 million note payable to the former shareholder of PWU.MultiGen

~~Segment~~The ~~Results~~MultiGen ~~for~~Technology ~~the~~has ~~Fiscal~~no ~~Years~~government permits ~~Ended~~required ~~March~~other ~~31,~~than ~~2012~~standard building and ~~2011~~electrical permits that would be required for industrial electric and air conditioning installations.

The following should be read in conjunction with the annual financial results of fiscal 2012 for each reporting segment. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12 — Segment Information.” We evaluate the performance of our segments based on net income (loss) from continuing operations. Certain income and charges are not allocated to segments in our management reports because they are not considered in evaluating the segments’ operating performance. The following is a summary of information about profit or loss by segment.Employees

	For the Year Ended March 31, 2012									For the Year Ended March 31, 2011
	Pro Water			SETCORP			Total			Pro Water			SETCORP			Total
Revenues	$	4,269,529		$	-		$	4,269,529		$	2,617,400		$	-		$	2,617,400
Cost of revenues		1,605,247			-			1,605,247			1,020,205			-			1,020,205
Gross profit		2,664,282			-			2,664,282			1,597,195			-			1,597,195
Operating expenses:
General and administrative		469,204			1,528,764			1,997,968			364,642			933,473			1,298,115
Research and development		-			125,292			125,292			-			53,782			53,782
Total operating expenses		469,204			1,654,056			2,123,260			364,642			987,255			1,351,897
Operating income (loss)		2,195,078			(1,654,056	)		541,022			1,232,553			(987,255	)		245,298
Other income (expense):
Interest income		111			644			755			38			37			75
Interest expense		(221,176	)		(82,338	)		(303,514	)		(229,311	)		(510,410	)		(739,721	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		-			127,438			127,438			-			(102,584	)		(102,584	)
Gain (loss) on settlement of payables and accrued liabilities		(28,256	)		733,039			704,783			-			167,592			167,592
Total other income (expense)		(249,321	)		778,783			529,462			(229,273	)		(445,365	)		(674,638	)
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes		1,945,757			(875,273	)		1,070,484			1,003,280			(1,432,620	)		(429,340	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes								(1,170,275	)								800
Net income (loss) from continuing operations								2,240,759									(430,140	)
Net income from discontinued operations								14,161									74,701
Net income (loss)							$	2,254,920								$	(355,439	)

As of March 31, 2013, we have eight (8) full time employees and no part time employees. We have two (2) part time consultants that assist with billing and accounting.

~~Pro Water (“PWU” and “PWC”)~~10

~~All~~Additional ~~revenues~~Information ~~and cost of revenues are associated with the Pro Water segment. See explanation above regarding changes in revenues and cost of revenues.~~

~~Total~~Information ~~operating~~that we ~~expenses~~file ~~increased~~with ~~$104,562~~ or ~~29%~~furnish ~~for~~to the ~~year~~SEC, ~~ended~~including ~~March~~our 31Annual Reports on Form 10-K, ~~2012~~Quarterly ~~compared~~Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to ~~the~~or ~~prior~~exhibits ~~period~~included ~~presented~~in ~~due~~these reports, are available free of charge on our website at www.setcorp.com soon after such reports are filed with or furnished to the ~~corporate~~SEC. ~~salaries~~From time to time, we also post announcements, updates, events, investor information and ~~stock~~presentations ~~compensation~~on ~~allocated~~our website in addition to copies of ~~$265~~all recent press releases. Our reports,~~000,~~ ~~increased~~including any ~~operations~~exhibits included in such reports, ~~and~~that ~~improvements~~are ~~made~~filed with or furnished to the ~~Blue~~SEC ~~Bench~~are ~~Class~~also IIavailable ~~SWD well~~on ~~discussed~~the ~~above~~SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. ~~Also~~You asmay aalso ~~result~~read and copy any materials we file with or furnish to the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, asNE, aRoom ~~percentage~~1580, Washington, D.C. 20549; information on the operation of ~~revenue,~~the ~~operating~~Public ~~expenses~~Reference ~~decreased~~Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may request copies of these documents from ~~14%~~the toSEC, ~~11%~~upon ~~due~~payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the ~~significant~~SEC ~~improvement~~at inits ~~revenue~~principal office at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, and Washington, D.C. 20549.

~~Total~~Neither ~~other expense increased $20,048 or 9% for~~ the ~~year~~contents ~~ended~~of ~~March~~our ~~31,~~website ~~2012~~nor ~~compared~~that maintained toby the ~~prior~~SEC ~~period~~are ~~presented~~incorporated ~~due~~into toor anotherwise ~~increase~~a inpart ~~financing~~of ~~activities.~~this ~~Other income (expense) includes interest income and interest expense~~filing. ~~The increase during the current period was primarily related to $221~~Further,~~000~~ ofreferences ~~interest and amortization expense related~~ to the ~~beneficial~~URLs ~~conversion~~for ~~feature~~these ~~recorded~~websites are inintended ~~connection with the $2.0 million note payable~~ to ~~the~~be ~~former~~inactive ~~shareholder~~textual ofreferences ~~Pro Water~~only.

11ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

~~SET~~Our ~~Corp~~corporate operations are conducted in Upland, CA in which we rent 4,330 square feet of office space for $4,763 per month.

~~There~~For isour noSWD ~~revenue~~wells, ~~generated~~we byoperate ~~this~~the ~~segment~~Blue ~~for~~Bench Class ~~any~~II SWD well on approximately 10 acres of ~~the~~property ~~periods~~we ~~presented~~own in Duchesne, Utah.

~~Total~~For ~~operating~~our ~~expenses~~SWD ~~increased~~wells ~~$666~~in North Dakota,~~801~~ orwe have ~~68%~~a ~~for~~surface ~~the~~lease ~~year~~for ~~ended~~10 ~~March~~acres 31in Cartwright, ~~2012~~ND ~~compared~~for to the ~~prior~~Cartwright ~~period~~Well ~~presented~~and ~~due~~a tosurface ~~approximately~~lease ~~$125,000~~for of10 ~~research~~acres ~~and~~in ~~development~~Williston, ~~related~~ND for tothe ~~MultiGen~~Williston Well. ~~Operating~~The ~~expenses~~Cartwright ~~include~~Well ~~management~~surface ~~and~~lease ~~administrative~~has ~~personnel~~a ~~costs~~term ~~(including~~of ~~non-cash~~fifteen ~~stock-based compensation)~~years, ~~corporate~~and ~~office~~the ~~costs,~~Williston ~~accounting~~Well ~~fees,~~has ~~depreciation~~a ~~and~~surface lease ~~amortization,~~for ~~legal~~the ~~expense,~~term ~~information~~of ~~systems~~ten ~~expense,~~years. ~~product~~For ~~marketing,~~each ~~sales~~of ~~expense~~the ~~and~~surface ~~research~~land ~~and~~leases, ~~development~~as ~~expenses. Expenditures~~long ~~included~~as ~~approximately~~each ~~$559,000~~of ~~for~~the ~~stock~~wells ~~based~~are ~~compensation,~~in ~~$244~~operation,~~000~~ inthe monthly ~~professional~~rent ~~fees,~~paid ~~$216,000~~to ineach ~~salaries~~land ~~and~~owner ~~wages,~~shall ~~$142,000~~be inbased ~~consulting~~upon ~~agreements,~~a ~~and~~fee ~~general~~of ~~corporate~~$0.07 ~~expenditures~~per ~~for~~barrel ~~our~~of ~~rent,~~Produced ~~utilities,~~Water ~~etc~~taken in ~~which~~at ~~were~~each of ~~not present in~~ the ~~previous~~respective ~~comparable period~~well.

~~Total~~ITEM other income was $778,783 for the year ended March 31, 2012 compared to total other expense of $445,365 for the prior period presented primarily due to the approximately $625,000 of write-offs related to a note payable and the related accrued interest, as well as approximately $81,000 for the write-off of certain accounts payable, offset by interest expense of $82,000 related to interest accrued on outstanding notes3. ~~Also~~LEGAL ~~included in other income for the current period was a change in fair value of derivative liability income of $127,438.~~PROCEEDINGS

~~Liquidity~~On April 27, 2012, a Complaint was filed against the Company by a previous consultant in the Orange County Superior Court (Shani Investments v. SET, Orange County Superior Court 30-2012-00565519). This is an action for Breach of Contract, Breach of Implied Covenant and ~~Management~~Common Counts with the trial date being set for September 23, 2013. The plaintiff has a motion for summary judgment scheduled for August 22, 2013. Plaintiff’s total ~~Plans~~claim is for approximately $500,000, including interest. At this time, it has been determined that it is likely the case will go to trial.

AsOn ~~shown~~May in16, ~~the~~2013, ~~accompanying~~a ~~consolidated~~Complaint ~~financial~~was ~~statements,~~filed ~~during~~ against the ~~year~~Company ~~ended~~by ~~March~~another ~~31,~~previous ~~2012,~~related weconsultant in ~~incurred~~the anUnited ~~operating~~States ~~income~~District ~~from~~Court ~~continuing~~(Rimon ~~operations~~Consultancy ~~before income taxes of $1,070,484~~v. As ~~of March 31~~SET, United States ~~2012,~~District weCourt ~~had~~CV ~~working~~13-00900 ~~capital of $1,343,750~~FMO). In This ~~addition,~~is wean ~~operations~~action ~~are~~for ~~primarily~~Breach ~~concentrated with one customer which represented 81%~~ of ~~total~~Contract ~~revenues. During~~with ~~the~~a ~~year~~prayer ~~ended~~for ~~March~~approximately ~~31, 2012, we generated positive cash flows from operations of~~ $~~249~~473,~~990~~000. We ~~The~~filed ~~net~~a ~~income~~motion ~~during the year ended March 31, 2012 was primarily due~~ to ~~non-cash~~dismiss ~~charges in connection with the amortization of discounts convertible notes payable due to beneficial conversion features and gain~~ on ~~derivative~~July ~~liability. During the year ended March 31~~5, ~~2012~~2013, ~~we funded operations through cash flows generated from the PWU segment~~ and ~~sales~~therefore ~~of common stock. In fiscal 2013,~~ we ~~intend~~are waiting to ~~fund~~file ~~operations~~any ~~and~~additional ~~pay~~responsive ~~down~~pleadings ~~liabilities~~until ~~through~~there is ~~cash~~an outcome on ~~hand and~~ the ~~positive~~motion ~~cash~~to ~~flow being generated by the PWU segment~~dismiss. We Inwill ~~addition,~~vigorously wedefend ~~intend to continue to negotiate~~ the ~~settlement of liabilities incurred in connection with the reverse acquisition of SET Corp~~action.

IfITEM current and projected revenue growth does not meet Management estimates, the Management may choose to raise additional capital through debt and/or equity transactions, renegotiate current convertible debt obligations, reduce certain overhead costs through the deferral of salaries and other means, and settle liabilities through negotiation4. ~~Currently,~~ weMINE ~~cannot~~SAFETY provide assurance that such financing will be available to it on favorable terms, or at all. If, after utilizing the existing sources of capital available to us, further capital needs are identified and if we are not successful in obtaining the financing, it may be forced to curtail its existing or planned future operations. We believe our plans will enable us to continue for a period in excess of one year from the date of the most recent balance sheet.DISCLOSURES

~~Operating~~This ~~Activities~~item is not applicable.

Cash provided by operating activities during the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $249,990 and $566,541, respectively. In 2012, this was the result of a net income of $2,254,920 offset by non-cash and non-operating items (depreciation, stock-based compensation, change in fair value of warrant liability, stock issued for services, income tax provision, and interest expense from the amortization of debt discounts) totaling $1,118,186 and net usage of current assets and liabilities of $886,744. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities during 2012 from 2011 was primarily due to the increase in our operations which caused assets such as accounts receivable and prepaids to increase. In addition, we have made an effort to decrease our accounts payable.11

~~Investing~~PART ~~Activities~~II

~~Financing~~Market ~~Activities~~Information

~~Financing~~Our Common ~~cash~~Stock ~~flows~~currently is ~~during the year ended March 31, 2012 amounted to $1,905,280 and consisted of $2,301,250 of proceeds from sale of common stock, payments~~ quoted on ~~a related party convertible note payable of $227,226, and payment on notes payable of $156,914. We used~~ the ~~proceeds~~OTCQB under ~~to fund operations and make improvements to~~ the ~~DIW~~symbol “SETS”. InThe ~~addition,~~following ~~payments~~tables ~~made~~set ~~were~~forth ~~in accordance with agreements in place. In~~ the ~~2011~~high ~~period, financing cash flows amounted to $80,288~~ and ~~consisted~~low ofbid ~~capital~~information ~~contributions~~for ofthe Common ~~$150,000~~Stock ~~and~~for ~~proceeds~~each ~~from~~quarter ~~sale~~within ofthe ~~common~~last ~~stock~~two offiscal ~~$208,000. These contributions were necessary to fund operations and make improvements to the DIW.~~years:

12QUARTERLY COMMON STOCK PRICE RANGES

Critical Accounting Policies

Quarter Ended	High		Low

June 30, 2011	$	2.10	$	0.75
September 30, 2011	$	1.80	$	0.75
December 31, 2011	$	3.00	$	1.05
March 31, 2012	$	2.14	$	1.17
June 30, 2012	$	1.39	$	0.36
September 30, 2012	$	0.97	$	0.35
December 31, 2012	$	0.50	$	0.23
March 31, 2013	$	0.33	$	0.15

WeThese ~~prepare~~quotations ~~our~~reflect ~~consolidated~~inter-dealer ~~financial~~prices, ~~statements~~without inretail ~~accordance~~mark-up, mark-down ~~with~~or ~~accounting~~commission ~~principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates~~ and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may ~~differ~~not ~~from~~represent ~~these~~actual ~~estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions~~transactions.

The methods, estimates, and judgment we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has defined "critical accounting policies" as those accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and require us to make our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based upon this definition, our most critical estimates are described below under the heading "Revenue Recognition." We also have other key accounting estimates and policies, but we believe that these other policies either do not generally require us to make estimates and judgments that are as difficult or as subjective, or it is less likely that they would have a material impact on our reported results of operations for a given period. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available, and actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.Holders

~~Impairment~~There were approximately 250 holders of ~~Long-Lived~~record ~~and~~of ~~Intangible~~our ~~Assets~~Common Stock as of March 31, 2013.

We adopted ASC 350 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by us be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. We evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undercounted cash flows for our pending patents, investment, at cost, and our Blue Bench Class II SWD well. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 350 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.Dividends

~~Long-lived~~We ~~assets,~~do ~~such~~not asanticipate ~~property~~paying ~~and~~dividends ~~equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes~~ in ~~circumstances indicate that~~ the foreseeable ~~carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable~~future. There ~~Recoverability~~are ofno ~~the~~restrictions ~~asset~~on isour ~~measured~~present byability ~~comparison of its carrying amount~~ to ~~undiscounted~~pay ~~future~~dividends ~~net cash flows the asset is expected~~ to ~~generate.~~shareholders Ifof ~~such~~our ~~assets are considered to be impaired~~Common Stock, ~~the~~other ~~impairment~~than tothose beprescribed ~~recognized is measured as the amount~~ by ~~which~~California ~~the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value~~law. Estimates of expected future cash flows represent management's best estimate based on currently available information and reasonable and supportable assumptions. Any impairment recognized is permanent and may not be restored.

~~Revenue~~Securities ~~Recognition~~authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

WeIn ~~generate~~order ~~revenues~~to ~~from~~compensate our ~~our~~officers, Blue Bench Class II SWD well. Customers are charged on a per barrel rate for the water in which we dispose. Revenue is recorded when the water is disposed assuming all the revenue recognition criteria stated below are satisfied. In connection with the water disposaldirectors, employees weand/or ~~reclaim oil which is suspended within the water. Periodically~~consultants, weour ~~sell~~Board ~~this reclaimed oil to third parties~~ and ~~revenue~~stockholders isadopted ~~recognized upon sale assuming all~~ the ~~revenue~~2006 ~~recognition~~Incentive ~~criteria~~and ~~stated~~Non-Statutory ~~below~~Stock ~~are~~Option ~~satisfied.~~Plan ~~We record revenue when~~ (the ~~following criteria are met: (1~~“2006 Plan”), ~~persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3)~~ the ~~selling~~2007 ~~price~~Incentive ~~is fixed~~ and ~~determinable;~~Non-Statutory ~~and~~Stock ~~(4)~~Option ~~collectability~~Plan ~~is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria~~ (3)“2007 ~~and (4~~Plan”), ~~are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed nature of the prices for the services performed~~ and the ~~collectability~~2010 ofIncentive those amounts. In addition, the Company extends credit to customers in which have shown the ability to pay for the services. At times, we extend credit to new customers; however, such is not done until we are satisfied through references, evidence of financial soundness, etc. Provisions for allowances are performed periodically and ~~estimates~~Non-Statutory Stock ~~for~~Option ~~uncollectable~~Plan ~~amounts~~(“2010 ~~are recorded as necessary based on our estimates~~Plan”).

~~Conversion~~The ~~Features~~2006, 2007, and ~~Warrants~~2010 ~~Issued~~Plans ~~With~~have ~~Convertible~~no ~~Debt~~shares reserved for issuance.

Our derivative financial instruments consist of embedded derivatives related to the senior convertible secured notes. These embedded derivatives include the conversion feature and the detachable warrants. As of the inception date of the agreement the debt was not considered conventional as defined in EITF 05-2, “The Meaning of "Conventional Convertible Debt Instruments" in issue No. 00-19”, codified into ASC 815. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that we record the conversion feature and related warrants at their fair values and record them at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value is to be recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each reporting date. If the fair value of the derivatives is higher at the subsequent balance sheet date, we will record a non-operating, non-cash charge. If the fair value of the derivatives is lower at the subsequent balance sheet date, we will record non-operating, non-cash income.12

13As of the end of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, we have issued the following stock options and shares under the Plans:

~~EITF~~Equity ~~98-5,~~Compensation ~~“Accounting~~Plan for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios” and EITF 00-27, “Application of Issue 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments”, both codified into ASC 470 governs the calculation of an embedded beneficial conversion, which is treated as an additional discount to the to the instruments where derivative accounting (explained above) does not apply. The amount of the value of warrants and beneficial conversion feature may reduce the carrying value of the instrument to zero, but no further. The discounts relating to the initial recording of the derivatives or beneficial conversion features are accreted over the term of the debt.Information

Income Taxes

Plan category

Number of securities remaining to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
(a)

Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance
(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2006 Plan

–

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2007 Plan

26,667

0.36

–

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: 2010 Plan

1,012,479

0.32

–

Equity compensation not pursuant to a plan

–

Total

1,039,145

0.33

–

WeRecent ~~follow~~Sales ~~ASC 740, Income Taxes for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis~~ of ~~assets~~Unregistered and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.Securities

~~Deferred~~We ~~income~~did ~~taxes~~not ~~may~~make ~~arise~~any ~~from~~sales ~~temporary~~of ~~differences~~unregistered ~~resulting~~equity securities ~~from~~during ~~income~~year ~~and~~ended ~~expense~~March ~~items~~31, ~~reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current~~2013, ~~depending~~except ~~on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified~~ as ~~current~~previously orreported ~~non-current depending on the periods~~ in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The method to estimate the deferred tax asset is based on the feasibility of recoverability of the asset. The valuation allowance applied to the deferred tax asset is based on our ~~relatively short operating history, which is primarily based on one significant customer concentration and the~~ current ~~expansion~~reports ~~into a new market and limitations~~ on ~~net~~Form ~~operating~~8-K ~~losses~~filed ~~due~~with to the ~~significant change in ownership of the Company in the fiscal year 2011~~SEC.

~~Off~~As an update to the Form 8-~~Balance~~K ~~Sheet~~that ~~Arrangements~~was filed on May 8, 2013 with the SEC, in which we reported that on May 7, 2013 we entered into a securities purchase agreement exempt from registration under Regulation S and Section 4(2) with an accredited investor for the purchase of 20,000,000 shares of our common stock for $2,600,000 at $0.13 per share, as of the date of this filing full consideration has been received.

WeRepurchase do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of ~~operations,~~Equity ~~liquidity,~~Securities ~~capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.~~

~~ITEM~~We ~~8. FINANCIAL~~did ~~STATEMENTS~~not ~~AND~~repurchase ~~SUPPLEMENTARY~~any ~~DATA~~options or warrants for shares of our common stock nor did we repurchase any shares of our common stock.

~~The~~ITEM ~~financial~~6. ~~statements~~SELECTED ~~required~~FINANCIAL ~~to be filed in this Annual Report, begin on page F-1 of this report.~~DATA

~~ITEM~~This ~~9. CHANGES~~item INis ~~AND~~not ~~DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE~~applicable.

~~None~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~ITEM~~In 9Aaddition to historical information, you should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with "Selected Financial Data" and our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion ~~CONTROLS~~and ~~AND~~analysis ~~PROCEDURES~~contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those presented under "Risk Factors" in our prior SEC filings and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

~~Disclosure~~For ~~Controls~~a ~~and~~full ~~Procedures~~discussion of our business please see Item 1 which begins on Pg. 2 of this Report

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, our Chief Executive and Principal Accounting & Financial Officers carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing evaluation, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2012 and that they do allow for information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive and Principal Accounting & Financial Officers as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.13

14Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

~~Internal~~The ~~Control~~following ~~over~~table ~~Financial~~summarizes ~~Reporting~~the results of our continuing operations amounts for the periods and dates shown:

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company in accordance with as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the (i) effectiveness and efficiency of operations, (ii) reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (iii) compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Our internal controls framework is based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

	For the Year Ended March 31,
	2013			2012
Combined Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue	$	3,405,687		$	4,269,529
Cost of revenue		1,438,369			1,605,247
Operating expenses		2,556,527			2,123,260
Operating income (loss)		(589,209	)		541,022
Other income (expense)		(13,847	)		529,462
Income (loss) from operations		(603,056	)		1,070,484
Net income (loss)	$	(1,275,127	)	$	2,254,920

~~Because~~Revenues ofdecreased ~~its~~$863,842 ~~inherent~~or ~~limitations~~20%, ~~internal~~for the ~~control~~year ~~over~~ended ~~financial~~March ~~reporting~~31, ~~may~~2013 ~~not~~compared ~~prevent~~to orthe ~~detect~~corresponding ~~misstatements~~prior period. ~~Also,~~This ~~projections~~decrease ofis ~~any~~based ~~evaluation~~upon ofmanagement’s decision ~~effectiveness~~ to ~~future~~reduce ~~periods~~its ~~are~~volume ~~subject~~intake to maximize the ~~risk~~Blue ~~that~~Bench ~~controls~~Class ~~may~~II ~~become~~SWD ~~inadequate~~wells ~~because~~longevity. The long term effect of utilizing ~~changes~~the inwells ~~conditions,~~maximum orcapacity would create additional capital investment and maintenance costs that outweigh the benefits ~~degree~~to ofshort ~~compliance~~term ~~with~~revenue gains. The Blue Bench Class II SWD well and Cartwright Well are currently averaging over 5,500 BPD and 1,800 BPD, respectively, which is within the ~~policies~~original orforecast ~~procedures~~projected. ~~may~~The ~~deteriorate~~Company’s largest customer accounted for 78% of revenue compared to 81% for the corresponding prior period.

~~Changes~~Cost of revenue decreased $166,878 or 10%, for the year ended March 31, 2013 compared to the corresponding prior period. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenue was 42% compared to 38% in ~~Internal~~the ~~Control~~prior ~~Over~~period. ~~Financial~~Items ~~Reporting~~included within cost of revenues represent labor, depreciation and amortization, equipment rental, supplies, utilities, repair and maintenance. Principal factors contributing to the decrease in cost of revenue included a decrease in variable expenditures such as rental equipment and repair and maintenance due to the decrease in barrels produced. Payroll related costs are primarily fixed due to the minimal staffing required to monitor the facility and thus do not fluctuate significantly from period to period.

~~There~~Total ~~have~~operating ~~been~~expenses noincreased ~~changes~~$433,267 or in20% ~~our~~for ~~internal~~the ~~control~~year ~~over~~ended ~~financial~~March ~~reporting~~31, ~~that~~2013 ~~occurred~~compared ~~during~~to the corresponding prior period ~~covered~~due byto ~~this~~traveling ~~report~~and administrative costs related to the previously disclosed pending acquisition that ~~have~~was ~~materially~~cancelled ~~affected~~and approximately $204,000 orincrease ~~are~~in ~~reasonably~~stock ~~likely~~based compensation due to ~~materially~~options ~~affect~~and shares issued for services. Operating expenses include management and administrative personnel costs (including non-cash stock-based compensation), ~~our~~corporate ~~internal~~office ~~control~~costs, ~~over~~accounting ~~financial~~fees, ~~reporting~~depreciation and amortization, legal expense, information systems expense, product marketing, and sales expense. During the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, expenditures included approximately $845,000 and $641,000 for stock based compensation, $442,000 and $285,000 in professional fees, $607,000 (including $79,000 in severance) and $437,000 in salaries and wages, respectively, and general corporate expenditures for the Company for rent, utilities, etc.

~~This~~Total ~~annual~~other ~~report~~expense onwas ~~Form~~$13,847 ~~10-K~~for ~~does~~the ~~not~~year ended ~~include~~March an31, ~~attestation~~2013 ~~report~~compared to income of ~~our~~$529,462 ~~registered~~for ~~public~~the ~~accounting~~corresponding ~~firm~~prior ~~regarding~~period ~~internal~~due ~~control~~to ~~over~~a ~~financial~~decrease ~~reporting~~in financing activities. Other ~~Management’s~~income ~~report~~(expense) ~~was~~includes ~~not~~interest ~~subject~~income, tointerest ~~attestation~~expense, bychange ~~our~~in ~~registered~~fair ~~public~~value ~~accounting~~of ~~firm~~derivative ~~pursuant~~liability, toand ~~temporary~~gain ~~rules~~on settlement of payables and accrued liabilities. The other expense during the ~~Securities~~current ~~and~~period ~~Exchange~~was ~~Commission~~primarily ~~that~~related ~~permits~~to us$119,846 to ~~provide~~the ~~only~~change in ~~management’s~~fair ~~report~~value inof ~~this~~derivative ~~annual~~liability ~~report~~and $191,954 of interest expense.

~~ITEM~~Provision ~~9B. OTHER~~for ~~INFORMATION~~income taxes was $672,071 for the year ended March 31, 2013 compared to a benefit of $1,170,275 for the corresponding prior period due to use of deferred tax assets.

OnSegment ~~April~~Results 5,for ~~2012,~~the weFiscal ~~entered~~Years ~~into~~Ended March ~~a letter agreement (“LOI”) with Cancen Oil Canada Inc.~~31, a2013 ~~British Columbia corporation (“Cancen”). Both Cancen~~ and ~~SET Corp. have agreed to abandon the LOI and have continued negotiations and further discussions as to forming a strategic alliance between the parties.~~2012

OnThe ~~June~~following ~~15,~~should ~~2012,~~be ~~our~~read ~~board~~in ofconjunction with ~~directors~~the ~~voted~~annual infinancial ~~favor~~results of ~~filing~~fiscal a2013 ~~restatement~~for ofeach ~~our~~reporting ~~Articles~~segment. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11 — Segment Information.” We evaluate the performance of ~~Incorporation~~our assegments ~~attached~~based ~~hereto~~on asnet ~~Exhibit~~income 3(iloss) ~~with~~from nocontinuing operations. ~~amendments~~Certain ~~thereto~~income ~~with~~and ~~the~~charges ~~California~~are ~~Secretary~~not ofallocated ~~State.~~to Insegments ~~addition,~~in ~~the~~our ~~board~~management ofreports ~~directors~~because ~~also~~they ~~voted~~are not considered in ~~favor~~evaluating ofthe ~~restating~~segments’ ~~and~~operating ~~amending~~performance. ~~our~~The ~~Bylaws~~following asis ~~attached~~a ~~hereto~~summary asof ~~Exhibit~~information ~~3(ii)~~about profit or loss by segment.

~~PART III~~14

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

	For the Year Ended March 31, 2013									For the Year Ended March 31, 2012
	Pro Water			SET Corp			Total			Pro Water			SET Corp			Total
Revenues	$	3,405,687		$	–		$	3,405,687		$	4,269,529		$	–		$	4,269,529
Cost of revenues		1,438,369			–			1,438,369			1,605,247			–			1,605,247

Gross profit		1,967,318			–			1,967,318			2,664,282			–			2,664,282

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		564,988			1,883,204			2,448,192			469,204			1,528,764			1,997,968
Research and development		–			–			–			–			125,292			125,292
Impairment of intangible assets		–			108,335			108,335			–			–			–
Total operating expenses		564,988			1,991,539			2,556,527			469,204			1,654,056			2,123,260

Operating income (loss)		1,402,330			(1,991,539	)		(589,209	)		2,195,078			(1,654,056	)		541,022
Other income (expense):
Interest income		110			580			690			111			644			755
Interest expense		(173,673	)		(18,281	)		(191,954	)		(221,176	)		(82,338	)		(303,514	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		–			119,846			119,846			–			127,438			127,438
Other, net		(26,964	)		84,535			57,571			(28,256	)		733,039			704,783
Total other income (expense)		(200,527	)		186,680			(13,847	)		(249,321	)		778,783			529,462

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes		1,201,803			(1,804,859	)		(603,056	)		1,945,757			(875,273	)		1,070,484

Provision (benefit) for income taxes								672,071									(1,170,275	)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations								(1,275,127	)								2,240,759
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations																	14,161
Net income (loss)							$	(1,275,127	)							$	2,254,920

~~Board~~Pro ofWater ~~Directors~~(“Pro Water Utah” and “ProWater Colorado”)

~~The~~All ~~Company's~~revenues ~~Board~~and cost of ~~Directors~~revenues ~~currently~~are ~~consists~~associated with ofthe ~~three~~Pro ~~(3)~~Water ~~directors~~segment. ~~The~~See ~~following~~explanation ~~sets~~above ~~forth~~regarding ~~certain~~changes ~~information~~in ~~about~~revenues ~~each~~and cost of ~~the directors:~~revenues.

~~ROBERT~~Total ~~GLASER,~~operating ~~58,~~expenses ~~DIRECTOR~~increased ~~since~~$95,784 or ~~2009~~20% ~~and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER since 2011. Mr. Glaser is CEO of SET Corp and is responsible~~ for ~~overseeing~~the ~~all~~year ~~quarterly~~ended ~~and~~March ~~yearly budgets~~31, ~~assuring~~2013 ~~corporate~~compared ~~compliance~~to ~~with~~the ~~local,~~prior ~~state~~period ~~and~~presented ~~federal~~due ~~agencies,~~to ~~management~~the ofincrease ~~corporate~~in ~~staff~~management and ~~consultants,~~administrative costs ~~upholding~~of the ~~company~~Company ~~image, achieving sustained growth and managing day to day operations. Mr. Glaser served over 25 years~~ as ~~President~~discussed ~~of an American based manufacturing company~~above. ~~Utilizing~~Also ~~Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing disciplines he has received numerous awards for excellence from customers such~~ as ~~DEP~~a ~~Corp and Alberto Culver in addition to accolades for quality and innovation in managing mega projects for Coca-Cola~~result, ~~Disney~~as ~~and~~a ~~Burger~~percentage ~~King. Mr. Glaser has an extensive background in engineering and has been recognized for achievements in strategic management, while receiving 3 President Awards and ranking in the top 5%~~ of ~~industry CEO’s. His expertise includes electrical and mechanical design~~revenue, ~~engineering,~~operating ~~and~~expenses ~~machinery~~increased ~~building~~ from ~~inception~~11% to ~~completion~~ 17%. He has managed work forces of up to 350 people and was known as an industry Guru. Achieving the impossible was the norm. His skills include machinery design, managing large workforces; detail oriented planning, forecasting, and creating short and long term company goals. From 2004-2008 he ran Glaser Corp which did consulting for the container and packaging industry.

OnTotal ~~September~~other 25expense decreased $48,794 ~~2009~~or 20% for the year ended March 31, 2013 compared to the ~~Board~~prior period presented due to a decrease in financing activities. Other expense includes interest income and interest expense. The decrease during the current period was primarily related to approximately $109,000 of ~~Directors~~amortization ~~elected~~expense ~~Bob~~related ~~Glaser~~to the beneficial conversion feature allocated to bePro anWater ~~Executive~~in ~~Director~~connection ofwith the ~~Company~~$2. ~~From~~0 ~~April~~million note ~~2008-December~~payable ~~2010~~to Mrthe former shareholder of Pro Water. ~~Glaser~~At ~~served~~March as31, ~~SET~~2013 ~~Corp’s~~and VP2012, the outstanding balances on the Pro Water note were $1,170,584 and $1,326,184, net of ~~Operations.~~the ~~From~~unamortized ~~June~~discounts ~~2006~~of to$134,082 ~~April~~and ~~2008~~$243,310, Mrrespectively. ~~Glaser~~During ~~served~~the asyear anended March ~~independent~~31, ~~consultant~~2013 toand a2012, ~~subsidiary~~the Company amortized $109,228 and $139,146 of ~~SET~~the ~~Corp~~discount or 8% and 9% of the liability to interest expense, respectively, using the effective interest method.

~~STEVE~~SET RITCHIE, 66, retired Brig. Gen. USA, DIRECTOR since 2005. Gen. Ritchie became an advisory board member to the Company in August 2005 and subsequently became a Director in October 2005. Prior to joining the Company in these positions, Mr. Ritchie had a career in the US Air Force, culminating with the rank of Brigadier General.Corp

15There is no revenue generated by this segment for any of the periods presented.

~~KEITH~~Total ~~MORLOCK,~~operating ~~36,~~expenses ~~DIRECTOR~~for ~~AND~~the ~~CORPORATE~~year ~~SECRETARY~~ended March ~~since~~31, ~~2009.~~2013 ~~Mr.~~increased ~~Morlock~~$337,483 isor ~~CEO~~20% ofcompared ~~SET~~to ~~Corp’s~~the ~~wholly~~prior ~~owned~~period ~~subsidiary~~presented ~~Pro~~due ~~Water~~to ~~and~~increased isoperations. ~~responsible~~Operating ~~for~~expenses include ~~the~~ management, ~~sales~~ and ~~operations~~administrative ofpersonnel ~~its~~costs ~~class~~(including IInon-cash ~~deep~~stock-based ~~injection~~compensation), ~~well.~~corporate ~~Mr.~~office ~~Morlock~~costs, ~~also~~accounting fees, ~~serves~~depreciation asand ~~President~~amortization, oflegal ~~SET IP Holdings~~expense, ~~where~~information hesystems isexpense, ~~responsible~~product ~~for~~marketing, ~~the~~sales ~~evaluation~~expense, ~~testing, certification~~ and ~~expansion of corporate technology~~ research and ~~acquisitions.~~development Mrexpenses. ~~Morlock~~During ~~has~~the ~~extensive~~year ~~history~~ended inMarch ~~GMP~~31, ~~SOP’s~~2013 and ~~over~~2012, 14expenditures ~~years~~included ofapproximately ~~dealing with regulatory agencies including the EPA~~$722,000 ~~SEC~~ and ~~the~~$559,000 for ~~FDA.~~stock Hebased ~~was~~compensation, ~~responsible~~$371,000 ~~for implementing~~ and ~~overseeing~~$244,000 ~~water~~in ~~treatment~~professional ~~designs~~fees, ~~related~~$389,000 to(including ~~critical~~$34,000 ~~areas~~ in ~~pharmaceutical~~severance) ~~manufacturing.~~and ~~In addition his expertise includes researching~~$216,000 in ~~analyzing,~~salaries and ~~monitoring financial~~wages, ~~technological~~respectively, and ~~demographic~~general ~~factors~~corporate toexpenditures ~~capitalize~~for onSET ~~market~~Corp ~~opportunities~~for ~~and minimizing competitive activity. He has developed and executed comprehensive operational and marketing plans~~rent, ~~both short and long range~~utilities, ~~to support the sales and revenue objectives of the organization~~etc.

OnTotal ~~September~~other 25income for the year ended March 31, ~~2009~~2013 was $186,680 ~~the~~compared ~~Board~~to income of ~~Directors~~$778,783 ~~elected~~for ~~Keith~~the ~~Morlock~~prior toperiod bepresented andue ~~Executive~~to ~~Director~~approximately $625,000 of ~~the~~write-offs related ~~Company. From~~to ~~April~~a ~~2008~~note topayable ~~December~~and ~~2010~~the ~~Mr.~~related ~~Morlock~~accrued ~~served~~interest, as ~~SET~~well ~~Corp’s~~as VPapproximately $81,000 for the write-off of ~~Business~~certain ~~Development. From~~accounts payable, ~~December~~offset ~~2006~~by interest expense of $82,000 related to ~~April~~interest ~~2008~~accrued Mron outstanding notes in the prior period. ~~Morlock~~Other ~~served~~income includes asinterest aexpense, ~~consultant~~change toin afair ~~subsidiary~~value of ~~SET~~derivative ~~Corp~~liability, and other.

~~Former Directors~~15

OnLiquidity ~~September 19, 2011, the majority shareholders voted for a new board of directors. Walter Ivison~~ and ~~Bill~~Management’s ~~Ball were not voted back into their positions as Directors of SET Corp.~~Plans

~~Current~~As ~~Executive~~shown ~~Officers~~in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, during the year ended March 31, 2013, we incurred an operating loss before income taxes of $603,056. As of March 31, 2013, we had a working capital deficit of $3,156,652. In addition, operations are primarily concentrated with two customers, one which represented 78% and ~~Significant~~one ~~Employees~~which represented 10% of total revenues. During the year ended March 31, 2013, we generated positive cash flows from operations of $874,823. The net loss during the year ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to a 20% decrease in revenue due to a 3% decrease in sales with our majority water processing customer and ~~Consultants~~20% increase in operating expenses mostly due to salaries, severance agreements, and stock-based compensation. During the year ended March 31, 2013, we funded operations through cash flows generated from the Pro Water segment and sales of common stock. In fiscal 2014, we intend to fund operations and pay down liabilities through cash on hand and the positive cash flow being generated by the Pro Water segment. In addition, we intend to continue to negotiate the settlement of liabilities. The Company has subsequently converted over $3,600,000 of debt into stock and its majority shareholder has committed to $2,600,000 in a stock purchase agreement of which $2,600,000 has been received and has been used to decrease Pro Water Colorado payables from approximately $3,000,000 to $1,100,000. In addition, the Company has recorded a gain on settlement of accounts payable of approximately $140,000 due to negotiations.

InIf ~~addition~~current and projected revenue growth does not meet Management estimates, the Management may choose to ~~Mr.~~raise ~~Glaser~~additional capital through debt and/or Mrequity transactions, renegotiate current convertible debt obligations, reduce certain overhead costs through the deferral of salaries and other means, and settle liabilities through negotiation. ~~Morlock~~Currently, ~~whose~~we ~~biographical~~cannot ~~information~~provide isassurance ~~set~~that ~~forth~~such ~~above~~financing will be available to it on favorable terms, ~~during~~or at all. If, after utilizing the ~~fiscal~~existing sources of capital available to us, further capital needs are identified and if we are not successful in obtaining the financing, it may be forced to curtail its existing or planned future operations. We believe our plans will enable us to continue for a period in excess of one year ~~ended~~from ~~March~~the 31date of the most recent balance sheet. The Company currently has $276,558 ~~2012~~in cash on hand, ~~Cynthia~~is ~~Glaser~~expecting ~~served~~$150,000 asin ~~Controller~~subscriptions receivable, and ~~Principal~~with ~~Accounting~~revenue ~~and~~generated from ~~Financial Officer~~the Pro Water segment is expected to fund operations for a period of at least one year.

~~Family~~Operating ~~Relationships~~Activities

~~Bob~~Cash ~~Glaser~~provided by operating activities during the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $874,823 and $868,990, respectively. In 2013, this was the ~~Company’s~~result ~~Chief~~of ~~Executive~~a net ~~Officer~~loss of $1,275,127 offset by non-cash and ~~Cynthia~~non-operating ~~Glaser~~items (depreciation, stock-based compensation, change in fair value of warrant liability, stock issued for services, income tax provision, and interest expense from the ~~Company’s~~amortization ~~Controller~~of debt discounts) totaling $1,978,909 and ~~Principal~~net ~~Accounting~~inflow of current assets and ~~Financial Officer~~liabilities ~~are~~of ~~married~~$171,041, which was primarily due to the decrease in prepaids and increase in accounts payable.

~~Involvement~~Investing ~~in Certain Legal Proceedings~~Activities

ToCash ~~the~~used ~~best of our knowledge, for the past five years, none of our directors or officers have been involved~~ in ~~any~~investing ofactivities ~~the~~during ~~following: (1) Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at~~ the ~~time of the bankruptcy or within two~~ years ~~prior~~ended toMarch ~~that~~31, ~~time;~~2013 ~~(2) Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations~~ and ~~other~~2012 ~~minor~~were ~~offenses); (3) Being subject to any order~~$4, ~~judgment~~652,701 orand ~~decree~~$965, ~~not subsequently reversed~~803, ~~suspended~~respectively. orIn ~~vacated,~~2013 ofand ~~any court of competent jurisdiction~~2012, ~~permanently~~the orprimary ~~temporarily~~investing ~~enjoining,~~activity was ~~barring,~~purchase ~~suspending~~of orfixed ~~otherwise~~assets ~~limiting~~related ~~his~~to orthe ~~her~~injection ~~involvement~~well ~~in any type~~ of ~~business~~$4,627,701 ~~securities~~and or$965,803, ~~banking~~respectively. ~~activities;~~Significant ~~and~~expenditures ~~(4)~~were made ~~Being found~~ by aus ~~court~~to ~~of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action)~~automate, ~~the~~winterize ~~Commission~~and oradd ~~the~~additional ~~Commodity~~stations ~~Futures Trading Commission~~ to ~~have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and~~ the ~~judgment~~injection ~~has~~well ~~not~~for ~~been~~increased ~~reversed,~~production ~~suspended,~~in ~~or vacated~~2012.

~~Adverse~~Financing ~~Proceedings~~Activities

~~There~~Financing ~~exists~~cash noflows ~~material~~during ~~proceeding~~the year ended March 31, 2013 amounted to ~~which~~$1,927,918 ~~any~~and ~~director~~consisted orof ~~officer~~$2,300,000 isof proceeds from related party note payable, payments on a related party ~~adverse~~convertible note payable of $264,828, and payment on notes payable of $107,254. We used the proceeds to usfund oroperations ~~has~~and make improvements to the DIW and building of the Cartwright Well. In addition, payments made were in accordance with agreements in place. In the 2012 period, financing cash flows amounted to $1,905,280 and consisted of proceeds from sale of common stock of $2,301,250, payments on a ~~material~~related ~~interest~~party ~~adverse~~convertible note payable of $227,226, and payments on notes payable of $156,914. These contributions were necessary to usfund operations and make improvements to the DIW and building of the Cartwright Well.

~~Compliance~~Critical ~~with~~Accounting ~~Section 16(A) of the Exchange Act~~Policies

~~Section 16~~We ofprepare ~~the~~our ~~Securities~~consolidated ~~Exchange~~financial ~~Act~~statements in ofaccordance ~~1934~~with ~~requires~~accounting ~~our~~principles ~~executive~~generally ~~officers,~~accepted ~~directors~~in ~~and~~the ~~persons~~United ~~who~~States ~~own~~of ~~more~~America. ~~than~~The ~~10%~~preparation of athese ~~registered~~financial statements ~~class~~requires the use of ~~our~~estimates ~~equity~~and ~~securities~~assumptions tothat ~~file~~affect ~~reports~~the reported amounts of ~~ownership~~assets and ~~changes~~liabilities inand ~~ownership.~~the ~~Based~~disclosure of oncontingent aassets ~~review~~and liabilities at the date of ~~such~~the ~~forms,~~financial statements and ~~Financial we~~the ~~believe~~reported ~~that~~amount ~~during~~of revenues and expenses during the ~~last~~reporting ~~fiscal~~period. ~~year,~~Our ~~except~~management ~~for~~periodically evaluates the ~~following,~~estimates ~~all~~and ofjudgments ~~our~~made. ~~executive~~Management ~~officers,~~bases ~~directors~~its estimates and judgments ~~ten~~on ~~percent~~historical ~~shareholders~~experience ~~complied~~and ~~with~~on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the ~~Section 16~~circumstances. ~~reporting~~Actual ~~requirements:~~results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions.

●The ~~Bill~~methods, ~~Ball~~estimates, ~~failed~~and tojudgment ~~file~~we 2use in ~~reports~~applying ~~for~~our 2most ~~transactions.~~critical ●accounting ~~Horst~~policies ~~Geicke~~have ~~did~~significant ~~not~~impact ~~have~~on ~~any~~the ~~transactions~~results towe report in our financial statements. The ●Securities ~~Bob~~and ~~Glaser~~Exchange ~~filed~~Commission 1(“SEC”) ~~report~~has ~~late~~defined "critical accounting policies" as those accounting policies that are most important to ~~report~~the 3portrayal ~~late~~of ~~transactions.~~our ●financial ~~Cynthia~~condition ~~Glaser~~and ~~filed~~results, 1and ~~report~~require ~~late~~us to ~~report~~make 3our ~~late~~most ~~transactions.~~difficult and ●subjective ~~Walter~~judgments, ~~Ivison~~often ~~failed~~as a result of the need to ~~file~~make 2estimates ~~reports~~of ~~for~~matters 2that ~~transactions~~are inherently uncertain. ●Based ~~Keith~~upon this ~~Morlock~~definition, ~~filed~~our 1most ~~report~~critical ~~late~~estimates toare ~~report~~described 6below ~~late~~under ~~transactions~~the heading "Revenue Recognition." ●We ~~Steve~~also ~~Ritchie~~have other ~~filed~~key 1accounting ~~report~~estimates ~~late~~and policies, but we believe that these other policies either do not generally require us to ~~report~~make estimates 2and ~~late~~judgments ~~transactions~~that are as difficult or as subjective, or it is less likely that they would have a material impact on our reported results of operations for a given period. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available, and actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

~~Code~~Impairment of ~~Ethics~~Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

We ~~have~~ adopted aASC ~~code~~350 Intangibles – ofGoodwill ~~ethics~~and Other. The Statement requires that islong-lived ~~applicable~~assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by us be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. We evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undercounted cash flows for our ~~directors~~pending patents, investment, at cost, and ~~officers~~our Blue Bench Class II SWD well. ~~Our~~Should ~~code~~impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of ~~ethics~~intangible isassets ~~posted~~will be adjusted, based on estimates ~~our~~of ~~website~~future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ~~can~~ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 350 also requires assets to be ~~accessed~~disposed of be reported at ~~WWW~~the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.~~SETCORP.US~~

~~Nominating~~Long-lived assets, such as property and ~~Compensation~~equipment and ~~Committees~~purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value. Estimates of expected future cash flows represent management's best estimate based on currently available information and reasonable and supportable assumptions. Any impairment recognized is permanent and may not be restored.

~~The~~Revenue Board of Directors does not have a standing nominating committee, compensation committee or any committees performing similar functions. As there are only three Directors serving on the Board, it is the view of the Board that all Directors should participate in the process for the nomination and review of potential Director Candidates and for the review of our executive pay practices. It is the view of the Board that the participation of all Directors in the duties of nominating and compensation committees ensures not only as comprehensive as possible a review of Director Candidates and executive compensation, but also that the views of independent, employee, and shareholder Directors are considered.Recognition

~~The~~We ~~Board~~generate ~~does~~revenues ~~not~~from ~~have~~our ~~any~~Blue ~~formal~~Bench ~~policy~~Class II ~~regarding~~SWD ~~the~~well ~~consideration~~and ofCartwright ~~director~~Well. ~~candidates~~Customers ~~recommended~~are bycharged ~~shareholders; any recommendation would be considered~~ on ana ~~individual~~per ~~basis.~~barrel ~~The~~rate ~~Board~~for ~~believes this is appropriate due to~~ the ~~lack~~water ~~of such recommendations made~~ in ~~the~~which ~~past,~~we ~~and~~dispose. ~~its~~Revenue ~~ability~~is torecorded when ~~consider~~ the ~~establishment~~water ofis ~~such~~disposed aassuming ~~policy~~all in the ~~event~~revenue ofrecognition ancriteria ~~increase~~stated ofbelow ~~such~~are ~~recommendations~~satisfied. ~~The~~In ~~Board~~connection ~~welcomes~~with ~~properly~~the ~~submitted~~water disposal, ~~recommendations~~we ~~from~~reclaim ~~shareholders~~oil ~~and~~which ~~would~~is ~~evaluate~~suspended ~~shareholder~~within ~~nominees in~~ the ~~same~~water. ~~manner~~Periodically, ~~that~~we itsell ~~evaluates~~this areclaimed ~~candidate~~oil ~~recommended~~to bythird ~~other~~parties ~~means.~~and ~~Shareholders~~revenue is ~~may~~recognized ~~submit~~upon ~~candidate~~sale ~~recommendations~~assuming byall ~~mail~~the torevenue ~~SUSTAINABLE~~recognition ~~ENVIRONMENTAL~~criteria ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~stated ~~CORPORATION:~~below ~~2345~~are Wsatisfied. ~~Foothill,~~We ~~Suite~~record 12revenue ~~Upland,~~when CAthe ~~91786.~~following criteria ~~With~~are ~~respect~~met: to(1) ~~the~~persuasive ~~evaluation~~evidence of ~~director~~an ~~nominee~~arrangement ~~candidates,~~exists; ~~the~~(2) ~~Board~~delivery has nooccurred; ~~formal~~(3) ~~requirements or minimum standards for~~ the ~~individuals~~selling ~~that~~price itis ~~nominates.~~fixed ~~Rather,~~and determinable; ~~the~~and ~~Board~~(4) ~~considers~~collectability ~~each~~is ~~candidate~~reasonably onassured. ~~his~~Determination orof ~~her~~criteria ~~own~~(3) ~~merits.~~and ~~However,~~(4) inare ~~evaluating~~based ~~candidates,~~on ~~there~~management's ~~are~~judgments regarding athe ~~number~~fixed nature of ~~factors that~~ the ~~Board~~prices ~~generally~~for ~~views~~the asservices ~~relevant~~performed and isthe ~~likely~~collectability toof ~~consider,~~those ~~including~~amounts. ~~the~~In ~~candidate’s professional experience~~addition, the ~~his~~Company orextends ~~her~~credit ~~understanding~~to ofcustomers ~~the~~in ~~business~~which ~~issues~~have ~~affecting~~shown ~~us,~~the ~~his~~ability orto ~~her~~pay ~~experience~~for inthe ~~facing~~services. ~~issues~~At ~~generally~~times, ofwe ~~the~~extend ~~level~~credit ofto new ~~sophistication~~customers; ~~that we face~~however, ~~and~~such ~~his~~is ornot ~~her~~done ~~integrity~~until ~~and~~we ~~reputation.~~are ~~With~~satisfied ~~respect~~through toreferences, ~~the~~evidence ~~identification~~ of ~~nominee~~financial ~~candidates~~soundness, ~~the~~etc. ~~Board~~Provisions for ~~has~~allowances ~~not~~are ~~developed~~performed aperiodically ~~formalized process. Instead, its members~~ and ~~our~~estimates ~~senior~~for ~~management~~uncollectable ~~have~~amounts ~~recommended candidates whom they~~ are ~~aware~~recorded ofas ~~personally~~necessary orbased byon ~~reputation~~our estimates.

~~Board~~Conversion ~~Meetings~~Features and ~~Annual~~Warrants ~~Meeting~~Issued ~~Attendance~~With Convertible Debt

Our derivative financial instruments consist of embedded derivatives related to the senior convertible secured notes. These embedded derivatives include the conversion feature and the detachable warrants. As of the inception date of the agreement the debt was not considered conventional as defined in EITF 05-2, “The ~~Board~~Meaning of ~~Directors~~"Conventional ~~acted~~Convertible 13Debt ~~times~~Instruments" byin ~~unanimous~~issue ~~written~~No. ~~consent~~00-19”, codified into ASC 815. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that we record the conversion feature and related warrants at their fair values and record them at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in ~~lieu~~fair value is to be recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each reporting date. If the fair value of the derivatives is higher at the subsequent balance sheet date, we will record a ~~meeting~~non-operating, ~~during~~non-cash ~~this~~charge. ~~period~~If the fair value of the derivatives is lower at the subsequent balance sheet date, we will record non-operating, non-cash income.

WeEITF ~~held~~98-5, an“Accounting ~~Annual~~for ~~Shareholder~~Convertible Securities ~~Meeting~~with ~~for~~Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios” and EITF 00-27, “Application of Issue 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments”, both codified into ASC 470 governs the ~~fiscal~~calculation ~~year~~of ~~ended~~an ~~March~~embedded 31beneficial conversion, ~~2010~~which onis ~~April~~treated 5as an additional discount to the to the instruments where derivative accounting (explained above) does not apply. The amount of the value of warrants and beneficial conversion feature may reduce the carrying value of the instrument to zero, ~~2011~~but no further. The discounts relating to the initial recording of the derivatives or beneficial conversion features are accreted over the term of the debt.

~~Audit~~Income ~~Committee~~Taxes

We ~~currently~~ dofollow ~~not~~ASC ~~have~~740, anIncome ~~Audit~~Taxes ~~Committee~~for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the ~~Board~~difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of ~~Directors~~assets ~~serves~~and ~~this~~liabilities ~~function~~using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.

~~ITEM~~Deferred 11income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. ~~EXECUTIVE~~ ~~COMPENSATION~~Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The method to estimate the deferred tax asset is based on the feasibility of recoverability of the asset. The valuation allowance applied to the deferred tax asset is based on our relatively short operating history, which is primarily based on one significant customer concentration and the current expansion into a new market and limitations on net operating losses due to the significant change in ownership of the Company in the fiscal year 2011 and subsequent to year end.

~~SUMMARY~~Off-Balance ~~COMPENSATION~~Sheet ~~TABLE~~Arrangements

~~The~~We ~~following~~do not ~~table~~have ~~sets~~any ~~forth~~off-balance ~~the~~sheet ~~compensation~~arrangements that ofhave ~~our~~or ~~Executive~~are ~~Officers~~reasonably ~~for~~likely ~~the~~to ~~fiscal~~have ~~years~~a ~~ending~~current or future effect on ~~March~~our 31financial condition, ~~2012~~changes ~~and~~in ~~2011~~financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($) (3)			Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Robert Glaser	2011		119,780	7,200	22,500	(4)		25,000	(2)	-	-	-	174,480
CEO and Director	2012		144,824	14,400	-	(4)		61,000	(2)	-	-	-	220,224
Cynthia Glaser	2011		77,527	4,560	6,750	(4)		-		-	-	-	88,837
Principal Financial Officer	2012		76,417	4,560	-	(4)		10,166		-	-	-	91,143
Keith Morlock	2011		137,934	7,200	22,500	(4)		25,000		-	-	-	192,634
Manager of Pro Water	2012		144,824	14,400	-	(4)		61,000		-	-	-	220,224
Grant King	2011		-	-	113,500	(5)		32,132		-	-	-	145,632
Former CEO and Director (1)	2012		-	-	-	(5)		-		-	-	-	-

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

~~(1)~~The ~~Mr.~~financial ~~King~~statements ~~resigned~~required asto ~~Chief~~be ~~Executive~~filed in ~~Officer~~this ofAnnual Report, begin ~~the Company~~ on ~~August~~page ~~25, 2010, and did not stand for re~~F-~~election~~1 ~~as Director~~ of ~~the~~this ~~Company on April 5, 2011~~report.

~~(2)~~ITEM ~~Options relating to Director Compensation for Mr~~9. ~~Glaser~~CHANGES ~~and~~IN ~~Mr.~~AND ~~Morlock~~DISAGREEMENTS ~~are~~WITH ~~disclosed~~ACCOUNTANTS onON ~~Director~~ACCOUNTING ~~Compensation~~AND ~~Table.~~FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

~~(3) See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for assumptions used in valuing stock compensation~~None.

~~(4)~~ITEM ~~Discretionary performance-based stock bonuses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011~~9A. ~~There~~CONTROLS ~~were~~AND ~~no stock awards issued for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.~~PROCEDURES

~~(5)~~Disclosure ~~Mr.~~Controls ~~King~~and ~~elected to receive his salary in stock in lieu of cash. There were no stock or options awarded to Mr. King for Officer or Director Compensation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012.~~Procedures

~~Narrative~~As required by SEC Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15, our Chief Executive and Principal Accounting & Financial Officers carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing evaluation, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2013 and that they do allow for information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ~~Summary~~ensure ~~Compensation~~that ~~Table~~information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive and Principal Accounting & Financial Officers as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Material~~Internal ~~Employment~~Control ~~Terms~~over ~~for~~Financial ~~Bob Glaser and Keith Morlock~~Reporting

~~Pursuant~~Our tomanagement ~~employment~~is ~~agreements~~responsible ~~adopted~~for onestablishing and ~~November~~maintaining 1,adequate ~~2010,~~internal ascontrol ~~amended~~over onfinancial ~~April~~reporting 7,for ~~2011,~~the ~~Bob~~company ~~Glaser,~~in ~~our~~accordance ~~CEO,~~with as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and ~~Keith~~15d-15(f) ~~Morlock,~~under ~~Manager~~the ofExchange ~~Pro~~Act. ~~Water~~Our ~~LLC~~internal ~~and~~control ~~our~~over ~~Corporate~~financial ~~Secretary,~~reporting ~~earn:~~is ~~(1)~~designed ~~annual~~to ~~base~~provide ~~salaries~~reasonable ofassurance regarding ~~$144,000,~~the (2i) ~~have~~effectiveness ~~the~~and ~~opportunity~~efficiency ~~for~~of ~~base~~operations, ~~salary~~(ii) ~~increases,~~reliability ~~annual~~of ~~cash~~financial reporting and ~~stock~~the ~~option~~preparation ~~bonuses~~of ~~based~~financial statements onfor ~~Company~~external ~~performance~~purposes ~~metrics;~~in ~~(3)~~accordance ~~certain~~with ~~expense~~generally ~~reimbursement;~~accepted accounting principles, and (4iii) ~~certain~~compliance ~~executive~~with ~~benefits.~~applicable laws ~~As of April 1, 2012, Mr. Glaser~~ and Mrregulations. ~~Morlock~~Our ~~both~~internal ~~received~~controls anframework ~~increase~~is tobased ~~their~~on ~~annual~~the ~~base~~criteria ~~salary~~set ~~pursuant~~forth toin ~~their~~the ~~aforementioned~~Internal ~~Employment~~Control ~~Agreements~~- ~~and~~Integrated ~~Amendments~~Framework issued ~~thereto. Thus,~~by ~~each~~the ~~shall~~Committee ~~have~~of anSponsoring ~~annual~~Organizations ~~updated base salary~~ of ~~$180,000~~the ~~per~~Treadway ~~year~~Commission (COSO).

IfBecause ~~either~~of ~~Mr.~~its ~~Glaser~~inherent orlimitations, ~~Mr.~~internal control ~~Morlock~~over ~~are~~financial ~~terminated~~reporting ~~without~~may ~~cause,~~not asprevent ~~defined~~or indetect ~~the~~misstatements. ~~agreements~~Also, ~~such~~projections ~~officer~~of ~~shall~~any beevaluation ~~entitled~~of effectiveness to afuture ~~payment~~periods ofare 8subject ~~months~~to of the ~~current~~risk ~~base~~that ~~salary~~controls ~~and~~may ~~will~~become ~~receive~~inadequate ~~acceleration~~because of ~~vesting~~changes ofin ~~outstanding~~conditions, ~~stock~~or ~~options~~that ~~issued~~the ~~pursuant~~degree of tocompliance with the ~~agreements~~policies or procedures may deteriorate.

18Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

~~Material~~There ~~Employment~~have ~~Terms~~been ~~for~~no ~~Cynthia~~changes ~~Glaser~~in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~Pursuant~~This toannual anreport ~~employment agreement adopted~~ on ~~November~~Form 1,10-K ~~2010,~~does ~~Cynthia~~not ~~Glaser, our CFO, earns: (1)~~ include an ~~annual~~attestation ~~base~~report ~~salary~~ of ~~$76,000,~~our ~~(2)~~registered ~~has~~public ~~the~~accounting ~~opportunity~~firm ~~for~~regarding ~~base~~internal ~~salary~~control ~~increases,~~over ~~annual~~financial ~~cash~~reporting ~~and~~as ~~stock~~such ~~option~~report is ~~bonuses~~not ~~based~~required onfor ~~Company~~smaller ~~performance~~reporting ~~metrics; (3) certain expense reimbursement, and (4) certain executive benefits~~companies.

IfITEM ~~Mrs~~9B. ~~Glaser~~OTHER is terminated without cause, as defined in her agreement, she shall be entitled to a payment of 6 months of her current base salary and will receive acceleration of vesting of outstanding stock options issued pursuant to the agreement.INFORMATION

~~Director Compensation~~None.

The following table sets forth the compensation of our directors for the fiscal years ending on March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively (if not addressed in the Executive Officer Compensation table above). 18

Name	Year	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)(1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Steve Ritchie	2011		-		-		32,132		-		-		-		32,132
	2012		-		24,375		62,000		-		-		-		86,375
Bill Ball	2011		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2012		-		-		30,000		-		-		-		30,000
Walter Ivison	2011		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
	2012		-		-		30,000		-		-		-		30,000
Robert Glaser	2011		-		-		32,132		-		-		-		32,132
	2012		-		24,375		62,000		-		-		-		86,375
Keith Morlock	2011		-		-		32,132		-		-		-		32,132
	2012		-		24,375		62,000		-		-		-		86,375

PART III

~~(1)~~ITEM ~~See~~10. ~~Note~~DIRECTORS, 2EXECUTIVE toOFFICERS, ~~the~~AND ~~consolidated~~CORPORATE ~~financial statements for assumptions used in valuing stock compensation.~~GOVERNANCE

19Board of Directors and Executive Officers

~~Outstanding~~Our ~~Equity~~Board ~~Awards~~of AtDirectors ~~Fiscal~~currently ~~Year~~consists ~~End~~of two (2) directors. The following sets forth certain information about each of the directors and executive officers:

	Option Awards									Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Robert Glaser		73,333				$	0.375		7/7/2013
		33,333				$	0.75		3/31/2014
		39,563		437		$	0.75		4/4/2021
		12,823		13,844		$	1.20		10/7/2021
										18,750	$	24,375
Keith Morlock		73,333				$	0.375		7/7/2013
		33,333				$	0.75		3/31/2014
		39,563		437		$	0.75		4/4/2021
		12,823		13,844		$	1.20		10/7/2021
										18,750	$	24,375
Steve Ritchie		73,333				$	0.375		7/7/2013
		39,563		437		$	0.75		4/4/2021
		20,000				$	0.90		various dates thru 2014
		12,823		13,844		$	1.20		10/7/2021
Cynthia Glaser		8,333				$	0.75		3/31/2014	18,750	$	24,375
		8,333				$	1.25		3/31/2022

KEITH MORLOCK, 37, DIRECTOR, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CORPORATE SECRETARY. Mr. Morlock serves as a Director, and as our CEO and Corporate Secretary. He also serves as our President of ProWater Colorado and Pro Water Utah, where he is responsible for the management, sales and operations of its class II deep injection well business. Mr. Morlock also serves as President of SET IP Holdings, where he is responsible for the evaluation, testing, certification and expansion of corporate technology and acquisitions.

~~ITEM~~Mr. 12Morlock has an extensive history in GMP, SOP’s and more than 14 years of dealing with regulatory agencies including the EPA, SEC and the FDA. ~~SECURITY~~ ~~OWNERSHIP~~He OFwas ~~CERTAIN~~responsible for ~~BENEFICIAL~~implementing ~~OWNERS~~and ~~AND~~overseeing ~~MANAGEMENTAND~~water ~~RELATED~~treatment ~~STOCKHOLDERS~~designs ~~MATTERS~~related to critical areas in pharmaceutical manufacturing. In addition, his expertise includes researching, analyzing, and monitoring financial, technological, and demographic factors to capitalize on market opportunities and minimizing competitive activity. He has developed and executed comprehensive operational and marketing plans, both short and long range, to support the sales and revenue objectives of the organization.

~~The~~This ~~following~~background ~~table~~has ~~sets~~given ~~forth~~him ~~the~~a ~~current~~unique ~~common stock ownership of (i) each person known by us~~ opportunity to beevaluate the ~~beneficial~~current ~~owner~~state of ~~five~~the ~~percent (5%) or more of our common based upon approximately 16~~industry,~~458,648~~ ~~shares~~come ~~outstanding~~to asthe offorefront ~~March~~with ~~31,~~unprecedented ~~2012,~~improvements ~~(ii) each officer~~ and ~~director~~form ofa state-of-the-art technology ~~Company~~that ~~individually,~~separates ~~and~~us ~~(iii)~~from all ~~officers~~competition. This ~~and~~attitude ~~directors~~has ofhelped ~~the~~to ~~Company~~form ~~as a group. In computing~~ the ~~number~~new ofdesigns ~~shares beneficially owned by a person~~ and ~~the~~innovations ~~percentage of ownership of~~ that our ~~person,~~proprietary ~~shares~~Centerline ofSWD ~~common~~facilities ~~stock~~are ~~subject~~based toupon; ~~options~~ and~~/or~~ ~~warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable, as appropriate, or will become exercisable within sixty (60) days~~ of ~~the~~which ~~reporting~~Mr. ~~date~~Morlock ~~are~~is ~~deemed~~its ~~outstanding,~~primary ~~even if they have not actually been exercised~~creator. This ~~Those~~manufacturing discipline ~~shares,~~has ~~however,~~proven ~~are~~that ~~not~~creating ~~deemed~~small ~~outstanding~~but ~~for~~significant ~~the~~changes ~~purpose~~can ofresult ~~computing~~in ~~the~~large ~~percentage ownership of any other person~~profits. His ~~Unless~~primary ~~otherwise~~focus ~~indicated,~~is ~~each~~always on ~~person~~customer ~~has~~service ~~sole voting~~ and ~~investment~~the ~~power~~belief ~~with~~that ~~respect to~~ the ~~shares~~resulting ofrelationships ~~common~~are ~~stock~~invaluable ~~shown,~~in ~~and~~creating ~~all~~new ~~ownership~~corporate isopportunities. These relationships offurther ~~record~~serve ~~and~~as ~~beneficial.~~a ~~The~~way ~~address~~to ofkeep ~~each~~him ~~owner is~~aware ~~in care~~ of the ~~Company~~latest atindustry ~~2345~~trends Wand ~~Foothill, Suite 12, Upland, CA 91786~~innovations.

20On April 19, 2013, the Board of Directors elected Mr. Morlock to serve as the interim Chief Executive Officer and Director until his resignation or until his successor is elected or appointed.

TITLE OF CLASS	NUMBER OF SHARES	NOTE	PERCENT OF CLASS	NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER
Common	6,586,527	(2)	36.80%	Horst Geicke
				15/F, AIA Central 1 Connaught Road Central Hong Kong
Common	1,333,333	(3)	7.79%	Favour Gain Holdings
				24/F, CDW Building 388 Castle Peak Road Tsuen Wan, New Territories Hong Kong
Common	1,150,000	(4)	6.78%	Brad Scott
				P.O. Box 4005 Bismarck, North Dakota 58503
Common	704,021	(1, 5)	4.23%	Keith Morlock, Secretary and Director
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786
Common	593,221	(1, 6)	3.56%	Robert Glaser, CEO and Director
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786
Common	169,398	(1, 7)	1.02%	Steve Ritchie, Director
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786
Common	36,782	(1)	0.22%	Walter Ivison, Former Director
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786
Common	28,429	(1, 8)	0.17%	Cynthia Glaser, Principal Financial Officer
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786
Common	10,000	(1)	0.06%	Bill Ball, Former Interim Chairman of Board of Directors
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786
Common	1,495,069	(1)	9.27%	Officers and Directors as a Group

ALLAN VIERNES, 27, CHIEF FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER, of AVV & Associates, is acting as our interim Chief Financial and Accounting Officer until his resignation, or until his successor is elected or appointed in his place. Mr. Viernes has been a California Certified Public Accountant since 2008. His business background and practice has focused on accounting, SEC matters, bankruptcy reporting, and claims analysis and financial modeling. Mr. Viernes served as an auditor with McKennon Wilson & Morgan, a public accounting firm, from 2006 to 2009 focusing on audits of private and publicly-held companies. He graduated with a Bachelor of Administration with a concentration in accounting in 2006 from DeVry University, and earned his Masters of Business Administration from the Keller Graduate School of Management in 2008.

1STEVE RITCHIE, 66, DIRECTOR, retired Brig. ~~All~~Gen. ~~officers~~USA, ~~and~~DIRECTOR ~~directors~~since as2005. aGen. ~~group~~Ritchie (6became ~~persons)~~an ~~Amount~~advisory board member to ~~approximately~~the 6Company in August 2005 and subsequently became a Director in October 2005.~~29%~~ ofPrior to joining the ~~outstanding~~Company ~~stock~~in ~~and~~these 9positions, Mr.~~27%~~ ~~Beneficial~~Ritchie ~~Ownership~~had a career in the US Air Force, culminating with the rank of Brigadier General.

2.Former ~~Mr.~~Directors ~~Geicke has 5,145,607 shares of common stock issued~~ and ~~1,440,919 dilutive shares relating to the convertible secured note as of May 31, 2012.~~Officers

3.On ~~Favour~~March ~~Gain~~29, ~~Holdings~~2013, ~~has~~Cynthia ~~666~~Glaser agreed to tender her resignation as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer to pursue other business opportunities and endeavors. As of April 12,~~667~~ ~~shares~~2012, Ms. Glaser and the Company entered into a confidential settlement agreement and mutual release of ~~common~~liability ~~stock~~in ~~issued~~which the parties have agreed, along with other terms, conditions and ~~666~~covenants,~~667~~ ~~exercisable~~to ~~warrants~~terminate asall obligations under the Employment Agreement entered into by and between the Company and Ms. Glaser on November 1, 2010. As consideration for entry into the confidential settlement agreement and mutual release of ~~May~~liability, 31Ms. Glaser was paid a total severance salary of $19,000 ~~2012~~paid over a three month period.

4On April 19, 2013, Robert Glaser agreed to tender his resignation as CEO, and as a member of the Board of Directors, also to pursue other business opportunities and endeavors. On April 16, 2013, Mr. ~~Scott~~Glaser ~~has~~and ~~650~~the Company entered into a confidential settlement agreement and mutual release in which the parties have agreed,~~000~~ ~~shares~~along ofwith ~~common~~other ~~stock~~terms, ~~issued~~conditions and ~~500~~covenants,~~000~~ ~~exercisable~~to ~~warrants~~terminate all obligations under the employment agreement entered into on November 2, 2010, and an amendment thereto on April 19, 2011, by and between Mr. Glaser and the Company. Mr. Glaser, as ofconsideration ~~May~~for 31the confidential settlement agreement and mutual release, ~~2012~~was paid a total severance salary of $45,000 paid over a three month period.

5.Family ~~Mr. Morlock has 531,683 shares of common stock issued and 172,338 vested options as of May 31, 2012.~~Relationships

6.None ~~Mr.~~of ~~Glaser~~our ~~has~~current ~~420,883~~officers ~~shares~~or directors have a “family relationship” as defined under Item 401(d) of ~~common~~Regulation ~~stock~~S-K ~~issued~~of the Securities Act of 1933. However, our previous Chief Executive Officer, Bob Glaser, and ~~172~~Cynthia Glaser,~~338~~ ~~vested~~our ~~options~~previous asChief ofFinancial ~~May~~and 31Accounting Officer, ~~2012~~are married.

~~7. Mr. Ritchie has 18,750 shares of common stock issued and 150,648 vested options as of May 31, 2012.~~19

8.Involvement ~~Ms.~~in ~~Glaser~~Certain ~~has~~Legal ~~18,703 shares of common stock issued and 9,726 vested options as of May 31, 2012.~~Proceedings

21To the best of our knowledge, for the past five years, none of our directors or officers have been involved in any of the following: (1) Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) Being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.

~~ITEM~~Adverse ~~13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE~~Proceedings

~~During~~There ~~the~~exists ~~fiscal~~no ~~years~~material ~~ended~~proceeding ~~March~~to ~~31,~~which any ~~2012~~director ~~and~~or ~~2011,~~officer ~~the~~is ~~Company~~a ~~had~~party ~~the~~adverse ~~following~~to ~~related~~us ~~party~~or ~~transactions:~~has a material interest adverse to us.

~~Horst~~Compliance ~~Geicke~~with Section 16(A) of the Exchange Act

~~Convertible~~Section 16 ~~Notes~~of ~~Payable~~the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to ~~Horst~~file ~~Geicke~~reports of ownership and ~~Related~~changes ~~Entities~~in ownership. Based on a review of such forms, and Financial we believe that during the last fiscal year, except for the following, all of our executive officers, directors and ten percent shareholders complied with the Section 16 reporting requirements:

On· ~~July~~Horst 7,Geicke ~~2010,~~failed we assumed various convertible note agreements with an accredited investor and shareholder for proceeds totaling $775,000 and accrued interest of $50,000. In addition at the Effective Date, a discount on the convertible debt remained of $381,459. On July 7, 2010, the holder converted the note and accrued interest into 2,066,667 shares of our common stock. Upon conversion we, recorded the remaining discount to ~~interest~~report ~~expense.~~1 ~~In addition, all accrued interest of $50,000, was forgiven, and treated as a capital contribution due to the related party nature of the~~ transaction ~~as such recorded to additional paid in capital~~.

~~Convertible~~· ~~Note~~Bob ~~Payable~~Glaser filed 1 report late to ~~Metropolitan~~report ~~Real~~8 ~~Estate~~late ~~LLC~~transactions.

As· ~~discussed~~Cynthia inGlaser ~~Note~~filed 1, onreport ~~July~~late ~~7, 2010, we entered into an agreement~~ to ~~acquire~~report ~~PWU. In connection with the acquisition, the member of PWU received a $2.0 million secured convertible promissory note payable over the period of one year from the closing date, incurring interest at~~ 5% ~~annually~~late ~~and a conversion feature at the option of the holder into shares of our common stock at a price of $1~~transactions.50 per share. The note is secured by all the assets of PWU. No beneficial conversion feature was recorded in connection with the note as the conversion price represented the closing price of our common stock on the date of the agreement. In addition, we recorded the $2,000,000 convertible note as a reduction to additional paid-in capital as it was deemed to be a return of capital initially contributed to PWU by the member.

On· ~~July~~Keith ~~12,~~Morlock ~~2010,~~filed ~~the terms of the acquisition were amended whereby the conversion rate of the $2,000,000 related secured convertible promissory note, which previously all converted at $~~1~~.50~~ atreport ~~the~~late ~~option of the holder, such amended~~ to soreport ~~that~~7 ~~$1,600,000~~late ~~of the note may be converted at $3~~transactions.00 per share and $400,000 may be converted at $0.375 per share. The convertible note was due based on the following: $100,000 paid on or before September 30, 2010, $200,000 paid on or before December 31, 2010, $200,000 paid on or before March 31, 2011 and the remaining amount of $1,500,000 with unpaid interest on or before June 30, 2011. The $100,000 payment due in September 2010 was paid in October 2010. On July 12, 2010, since the conversion price of $0.375 related to $400,000 was significantly less than the fair value of our common stock per the closing market price, a beneficial conversion feature was present. We valued the beneficial conversion feature as of the date of the amended agreement in the amount of $696,000, and recorded the maximum discount allowed of $400,000 against the note. The discount was being amortized over the term of the note using the straight line method due to the relatively short maturity of the note.

On· ~~January~~Steve ~~14,~~Ritchie ~~2011,~~filed ~~the terms of the convertible note were amended. As of the date of the amendment, the unpaid principal amount was $~~1~~,880,000.~~ ~~Under~~report ~~the~~late ~~terms of the new agreement, the term of the note was extended~~ to ~~five~~report ~~years~~5 ~~and~~late ~~all accrued interest was forgiven~~transactions. We are to make 60 monthly payments of $35,478 commencing January 2011 and concluding December 2015. All other terms, including conversion and interest rates remained the same. The effective interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2011 was 22%. Under ASC 470, Debt, we accounted for the change in terms of the debt as an extinguishment of the debt due to the significant change in the repayment period which impacted the expected cash flows in excess of 10%. Thus, the existing discount of $183,333 was removed and a new discount, with a beneficial conversion feature of $400,000 was recorded. Due to Geicke being a significant shareholder, no gain or loss was recorded and the result of the extinguishment was recorded to additional paid in capital. At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the $243,310 and $382,455 unamortized discount on the note was allocated between short and long term based on the expected annual amortization of which $109,318 and $139,196 has been allocated to short-term portion with the remaining $133,992 and $394,308 allocated to long-term portion. During the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company amortized $139,146 and $17,454 of the discount to interest expense, respectively, using the effective interest method. The note holder requested the principal payments for November and December 2011 and January and February 2012 be deferred. Therefore, payments are added on to the end of the term. The following is the expected amortization for the remaining discount under the effective interest rate method for the years ending March 31: $109,318, $77,964, $45,005, and $11,023 in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively.

22Code of Ethics

~~Robert~~We ~~Glaser~~have adopted a code of ethics that is applicable to our directors and officers. Our code of ethics is posted on our website and can be accessed at WWW.SETCORP.US

OnNominating ~~July~~and 7, 2010, we granted 73,333 stock options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price of $0.375 per share. The options vest over one year. On January 13, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 33,333 shares of common stock valued at $22,500 to Robert Glaser as discretionary compensation bonuses. Compensation bonuses for stock came from the equity bonus plan. On March 31, 2011 we granted 33,333 stock options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price of $0.75 per share according to his employment contract. The options vest over one year.Committees

OnThe ~~April~~Board 4,of ~~2011,~~Directors wedoes ~~granted~~not ~~40,000~~have ~~stock~~a ~~options~~standing nominating tocommittee, ~~Robert~~compensation ~~Glaser~~committee ~~with~~or anany ~~exercise~~committees ~~price~~performing ofsimilar $0functions.75 ~~per~~As ~~share. The~~there ~~options~~are ~~vest~~only two ~~over~~Directors serving ~~one~~on ~~year.~~the ~~On October 7~~Board, ~~2011,~~it weis ~~granted~~the ~~26,667~~view ~~stock options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price~~ of ~~$1.20~~the ~~per~~Board ~~share. The~~that ~~options~~all ~~vest~~Directors ~~over~~should ~~one~~participate ~~year.~~in Onthe ~~March~~process ~~27,~~for ~~2002,~~the wenomination ~~granted~~and ~~common~~review of ~~stock~~potential toDirector ~~three~~Candidates ~~board~~and ~~members~~for ~~which~~the ~~vest~~review ~~over~~of aour ~~twenty-four~~executive ~~(24)~~pay ~~month~~practices. ~~period,~~It ~~starting~~is ~~April 1, 2012 and then~~ the ~~first~~view of ~~each~~the ~~quarter~~Board ~~thereafter~~that ~~(ending~~the ~~January~~participation of 1,all ~~2014)~~Directors ~~under~~in the ~~agreement,~~duties weof ~~agreed~~nominating toand ~~issue~~compensation ~~150,000~~committees ~~shares~~ensures ofnot ~~common~~only ~~stock~~as tocomprehensive ~~Robert~~as ~~Glaser. See~~possible ~~Note~~a 10review of ~~for~~Director ~~additional~~Candidates ~~information. On~~and ~~March~~executive 31compensation, ~~2012,~~but wealso ~~granted~~that ~~50,000~~the ~~stock~~views ~~options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price~~ of ~~$1.20~~independent, ~~per~~employee, ~~share~~and ~~according~~shareholder toDirectors are ~~his employment contract~~considered. ~~The options vest over one year.~~

~~See~~The ~~Note~~Board 11does ~~for~~not ~~disclosures~~have any formal policy regarding the consideration of director candidates recommended by shareholders; any recommendation would be considered on an ~~amendment~~individual basis. The Board believes this is appropriate due to ~~Robert~~the ~~Glaser~~lack of such recommendations made in the past, and its ability to consider the establishment of such a policy in the event of an increase of such recommendations. The Board welcomes properly submitted recommendations from shareholders and would evaluate shareholder nominees in the same manner that it evaluates a candidate recommended by other means. Shareholders may submit candidate recommendations by mail to Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation: 2345 W Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786. With respect to the evaluation of director nominee candidates, the Board has no formal requirements or minimum standards for the individuals that it nominates. Rather, the Board considers each candidate on his or her own merits. However, in evaluating candidates, there are a number of factors that the Board generally views as relevant and is likely to consider, including the candidate’s ~~employment~~professional ~~contract~~experience, his or her understanding of the business issues affecting us, his or her experience in facing issues generally of the level of sophistication that we face, and his or her integrity and reputation. With respect to the identification of nominee candidates, the Board has not developed a formalized process. Instead, its members and our senior management have recommended candidates whom they are aware of personally or by reputation.

~~Cynthia~~Board ~~Glaser~~Meetings and Annual Meeting Attendance

OnThe ~~January 13, 2011, the~~ Board of Directors ~~approved~~acted ~~the~~23 ~~issuance~~times ofby ~~10,000~~unanimous written ~~shares~~consent ofin ~~common~~lieu ~~stock~~of ~~valued~~a atmeeting ~~$6,750~~during ~~to Cynthia Glaser as discretionary compensation bonuses. Compensation bonuses for stock came from~~ the ~~equity~~fiscal ~~bonus~~year ~~plan.~~ended On March 31, ~~2011 the Company we granted 8,333 stock options to Cynthia Glaser with an exercise price of $0~~2013.~~75 per share according to her employment contract. The options vest over one year.~~

AtWe ~~March~~held ~~31, 2011, we owed~~ an ~~entity~~Annual ~~controlled~~Shareholder byMeeting ~~Cynthia and Robert Glaser $24,085~~ for ~~management services previously provided under a consulting contract. Payments to this entity during~~ the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2011~~2012 ~~were~~on ~~$54~~December 21,~~500~~ 2012.

~~On March 31, 2012, we granted 8,333 stock options to Cynthia Glaser with an exercise price of $0.75 per share according to her employment contract. The options vest over one year.~~20

AtAudit March 31, 2012, we owed an entity controlled by Cynthia and Robert Glaser $0 for management services previously provided under a consulting contract. Payments to this entity during the year ended March 31, 2012 were $24,085.Committee

~~Keith~~We currently ~~Morlock~~do not have an Audit Committee and the Board of Directors serves this function.

OnITEM ~~July 7, 2010, we granted 73,333 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $0~~11.~~375~~ ~~per~~EXECUTIVE share. The options vest over one year. On January 13, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 33,333 shares of common stock valued at $22,500 to Keith Morlock as discretionary compensation bonuses. Compensation bonuses for stock came from the equity bonus plan. On March 31, 2011 we granted 33,333 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share according to his employment contract. The options vest over one year.COMPENSATION

AtSUMMARY ~~March~~COMPENSATION 31, 2011, we owed an entity controlled by Keith Morlock $35,411 for management services previously provided under a consulting contract. Payments to this entity during the year ended March 31, 2011 were $16,500.TABLE

~~On April 4, 2011, we granted 40,000 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share.~~ The ~~options~~following ~~vest~~table ~~over~~sets ~~one~~forth ~~year.~~the Oncompensation ~~October 7, 2011, we granted 26,667 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price~~ of ~~$1.20~~our ~~per~~Executive Officers ~~share. The~~for ~~options vest over one year. On March 27, 2002, we granted common stock to three board members which vest over a twenty-four (24) month period, starting April 1, 2012 and then~~ the ~~first~~fiscal ofyears ~~each quarter thereafter (~~ending ~~January~~on ~~1, 2014) under the agreement, we agreed to issue 150,000 shares of common stock to Keith Morlock. See Note 10 for additional information.. On~~ March 31, ~~2012,~~2013 weand ~~granted 50,000 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $1~~2012.~~20 per share according to his employment contract. The options vest over one year.~~

See Note 11 for disclosures regarding an amendment to Keith Morlock’s employment contract.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)(3)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)

Robert Glaser	2013	180,000	23,000	27,250	(4)	31,684	(2)	–	–	10,385	(1)	272,319
Former CEO and Director (5)	2012	144,824	14,400	-	(4)	61,000	(2)	–	–	–		220,224

Cynthia Glaser (6)	2013	76,000	7,060	10,750	(4)	1,785		–	–	1,949	(1)	97,544
Former Principal Financial Officer	2012	76,417	4,560	-	(4)	10,166		–	–	–		91,143

Keith Morlock	2013	180,000	23,000	27,250	(4)	31,684	(2)	–	–	7,788	(1)	269,722
CEO and Director	2012	144,824	14,400	-	(4)	61,000	(2)	–	–	–		220,224

~~Grant~~(1) ~~King~~Amounts represent payment for accrued vacation.

On(2) ~~July~~Options 7,relating ~~2010, we issued 933,333 shares of its common stock~~ to ~~Grant King, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and~~ Director inCompensation ~~exchange~~ for ~~the~~Mr. ~~conversion~~Glaser ~~of $357,000 of unpaid, accrued~~ and ~~other compensations due to~~ Mr. ~~King.~~Morlock Onare ~~the~~disclosed ~~Effective~~on ~~Date,~~Director weCompensation ~~granted 73,333 stock options to Grant King with an exercise price of $0~~Table.~~375 per share. The options vest over one year.~~

On(3) ~~January~~See ~~13,~~Note ~~2011,~~2 to the ~~Board~~consolidated offinancial ~~Directors~~statements ~~approved~~for ~~the~~assumptions ~~issuance~~used ofin ~~20,000~~valuing ~~shares of common~~ stock ~~valued at $13,500 to Grant King as discretionary~~ compensation ~~bonuses~~. ~~Compensation bonuses for stock came from the equity bonus plan.~~

On(4) ~~March~~Discretionary ~~27,~~performance-based ~~2012,~~stock webonuses ~~granted~~for ~~75,000~~the ~~bonus~~fiscal ~~stock~~year ~~options~~ended toMarch ~~Grant~~31, ~~King~~2013. ~~with~~There anwere ~~exercise~~no ~~price~~stock ofawards ~~$1.30. The~~issued ~~options~~for ~~vest~~the ~~over~~fiscal ~~one~~ year ended March 31, 2012.

~~See~~(5) ~~Note~~On 9April ~~for~~19, ~~discussion~~2013, ~~regarding~~Robert Glaser agreed to tender his resignation as CEO, and as a ~~consulting~~member ~~contract~~of ~~with~~the ~~Grant~~Board ~~King~~of Directors, also to pursue other business opportunities and endeavors.

23(6) On March 29, 2013, Cynthia Glaser agreed to tender her resignation as Chief Financial and Accounting Officer to pursue other business opportunities and endeavors.

~~ITEM~~Narrative ~~14. PRINCIPAL~~Disclosure ~~ACCOUNTANT~~to ~~FEES~~Summary ~~AND~~Compensation ~~SERVICES~~Table

~~Detail~~Material ofEmployment ~~fees~~Terms ~~paid~~for toBob ~~dbbmckennon:~~Glaser and Keith Morlock

a.Pursuant ~~Audit~~to ~~Fees:~~employment ~~Aggregate~~agreements ~~fees~~adopted ~~billed~~on November ~~for~~1, ~~professional~~2010, ~~services~~as ~~rendered~~amended ~~for~~on ~~the~~April ~~audit~~7, of2011, ~~our~~Bob Glaser and Keith Morlock, earned: (1) annual ~~financial~~base ~~statements~~salaries ~~for~~of $144,000, (2) have the ~~periods~~opportunity ~~ended~~for ~~March~~base 31salary increases, ~~2012~~annual cash and ~~2011,~~stock ~~were~~option ~~approximately~~bonuses ~~$104,970~~based on Company performance metrics; (3) certain expense reimbursement; and ~~$35~~(4) certain executive benefits. As of April 1,~~770~~ 2012, ~~respectively~~Mr. bGlaser and Mr. ~~Audit-Related~~Morlock ~~Fees:~~both ~~There~~received an ~~were~~increase noto ~~fees~~their ~~billed~~annual ~~for~~base ~~audit-related~~salary ~~services~~pursuant ~~for~~to ~~the~~their ~~period~~aforementioned ~~ending~~Employment ~~March~~Agreements ~~31,~~and ~~2011~~Amendments thereto. Thus, each ~~For~~had ~~the~~an ~~year~~annual ~~ended~~updated ~~March~~base 31salary of $180,000 ~~2012~~per year. Pursuant to such employment agreements, ~~fees~~if Mr. Glaser or Mr. Morlock were ~~approximately~~terminated $5without cause,~~000~~ ~~for~~as ~~review~~defined ofin the ~~Company's~~agreements, ~~SEC~~such ~~comment~~officer ~~letters.~~would c.have ~~Tax~~been ~~Fees.~~entitled ~~Fees~~to ~~billed~~a ~~for~~payment ~~tax~~of ~~services~~8 ~~were~~months ~~$10,500~~of the current base salary and $0would ~~for~~have ~~the~~received ~~periods~~acceleration ~~ended~~of ~~March~~vesting ~~31,~~of ~~2012~~outstanding ~~and~~stock ~~2011,~~options ~~respectively~~issued pursuant to the agreements.

~~Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures~~21

~~Our~~Updated ~~Board~~Employment ofTerms ~~Directors who acts as the Audit Committee has policies and procedures that require the pre-approval by the Audit Committee~~ of ~~all~~Keith fees paid to, and all services performed by, our independent accounting firms. At the beginning of each year, the Audit Committee approves the proposed services, including the nature, type and scope of services contemplated and the related fees, to be rendered by these firms during the year. In addition, Audit Committee pre-approval is also required for those engagements that may arise during the course of the year that are outside the scope of the initial services and fees pre-approved by the Audit Committee.Morlock

~~Pursuant~~By tomutual ~~the~~agreement, ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~as ~~Act~~of December 31, 2012 Mr. Morlock’s employment contract was terminated, an in consideration for such termination he received a severance salary of ~~2002~~$17,500 ~~100%~~for three months thereafter, an issuance of 93,750 shares of restricted common stock for the ~~fees~~remaining director’s stock issuance, and ~~services~~a ~~provided~~five asyear ~~noted~~extension ~~above~~of ~~were~~all ~~authorized~~remaining options then outstanding and ~~approved~~issued. byOn April 18, 2013, the ~~Audit~~board ~~Committee~~of directors inauthorized ~~compliance~~the ~~with~~continuation of Mr. Morlock’s severance salary for the ~~pre-approval~~month ~~policies~~of ~~and~~April, ~~procedures~~thereafter ~~described~~he ~~herein~~will receive a monthly salary of $20,000 per month. In addition, the board had Mr. Morlock paid a bonus of $4,500, which was the bonus he would have received under the previous employment contract with the Company.

~~ITEM~~Updated ~~15. EXHIBITS~~Termination ~~AND~~of ~~FINANCIAL~~Employment ~~STATEMENT~~for ~~SCHEDULES~~Robert Glaser

~~See~~By ~~Exhibit~~mutual ~~Index~~agreement, ~~below~~as of April 16, 2013, Mr. Glaser’s employment contract was terminated in consideration of a mutual release of liability and a severance salary of $45,000, which was paid over three months. All of Mr. Glaser’s options, and his remaining issuance for directors’ bonus shares, were cancelled.

~~Pursuant~~Material toEmployment ~~the~~Terms ~~requirements~~for ofAllan ~~Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized.~~Viernes

	SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL TEHCHOLOGIES CORPOATION
Dated: June 29, 2012	/s/ Robert Glaser
	By: Robert Glaser,
	Chief Executive Officer
Dated: June 29, 2012	/s/ Cynthia Glaser
	By: Cynthia Glaser
	Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Pursuant to a letter agreement with AVV & Associates, Mr. Viernes as a consultant to the Company, shall be paid a monthly fee for such services in the amount of $10,000 per month.

24Material Employment Terms and Termination of Employment for Cynthia Glaser

Pursuant to ~~the~~an ~~requirements~~employment ofagreement ~~the~~adopted on ~~Securities~~November ~~and~~1, ~~Exchange~~2010, ~~Act~~Cynthia Glaser, our CFO, earns: (1) an annual base salary of ~~1934~~$76,000, ~~this~~(2) ~~Report~~ has ~~been~~the ~~signed~~opportunity ~~below~~for bybase ~~the~~salary increases, ~~following~~annual ~~persons~~cash and stock option bonuses based on ~~behalf~~Company ofperformance ~~the~~metrics; ~~registrant~~(3) certain expense reimbursement, and in(4) certain ~~the~~executive ~~capacities~~benefits. Per such agreement, if Mrs. Glaser was terminated without cause, she would be entitled to a payment of 6 months of her current base salary and onwill ~~the~~receive ~~dates~~acceleration ~~indicated~~of vesting of outstanding stock options issued pursuant to the agreement.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Robert Glaser	Director	June 29, 2012
Robert Glaser

However, by mutual agreement, as of April 12, 2012, Mrs. Glaser’s employment contract was terminated in consideration of a mutual release of liability and a severance salary of $19,000, which was paid to her over three months. All of Mrs. Glaser’s options were also cancelled.

/s/ Keith Morlock		Director		June 29, 2012
Keith Morlock

Director Compensation

25The following table sets forth the compensation of our directors for the fiscal years ending on March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively (if not addressed in the Executive Officer Compensation table above).

EXHIBIT INDEX

Name

Year

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

($)

Stock Awards

($)

Option

Awards

($)(1)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

($)

Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

($)

All Other Compensation

($)

Total

($)

Steve Ritchie

2013

–

101,200

11,158

–

112,358

2012

–

24,375

62,000

–

86,375

Bill Ball (2)

2013

–

2012

–

30,000

–

30,000

Walter Ivison (3)

2013

–

2012

–

30,000

–

30,000

Robert Glaser (4)

2013

–

97,500

–

97,500

2012

–

24,375

62,000

–

86,375

Keith Morlock

2013

–

170,625

–

170,625

2012

–

24,375

62,000

–

86,375

Exhibit Number	Description
3(i)	Restated Articles of Incorporation
3(ii)	Amended and Restated Bylaws
10.1	Pro Water Acquisition Agreement and Convertible Secured Promissory Note (1)
10.2	Amendment No. 1 to Pro Water Acquisition Agreement (2)
10.3	Technology Purchase Agreement with World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd. (3)
10.4	Amendment to Convertible Secured Promissory Note (4)
10.5	Amendment to Technology Purchase Agreement with World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd. (5)
21.1	Subsidiaries
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

(1)	See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for assumptions used in valuing stock compensation.

(12) ~~Incorporated~~On bySeptember ~~reference~~19, ~~from~~2011,Bill ~~Exhibit~~Ball ~~1.01~~was tonot ~~the~~re-elected ~~Company’s~~by ~~Current~~the ~~Report~~majority onof ~~Form~~the ~~8-K~~shareholders asto ~~filed~~serve ~~with~~on the ~~SEC~~Board onof ~~July 9, 2010~~Directors.

(23) ~~Incorporated~~On bySeptember ~~reference~~19, ~~from~~2011, ~~Exhibit~~Walter ~~10.1~~Ivison towas ~~the~~not ~~Company’s~~re-elected ~~Annual~~by ~~Report~~the onmajority ~~Form~~of ~~10-K~~the asshareholders ~~filed~~to ~~with~~serve ~~the SEC~~ on ~~July~~the ~~14,~~Board ~~2010~~of Directors.

(34) ~~Incorporated~~On byApril ~~reference~~19, ~~from~~2013, ~~Exhibit~~Robert 10Glaser agreed to ~~the~~tender ~~Company’s~~his ~~Current~~resignation ~~Report~~as onCEO, ~~Form~~and ~~8-K~~ as ~~filed~~a ~~with~~member of the ~~SEC~~Board onof ~~September 3~~Directors, ~~2010~~also to pursue other business opportunities and endeavors.

~~(4) Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2011.~~22

~~(5)~~Outstanding ~~Incorporated~~Equity byAwards ~~reference~~At ~~from~~Fiscal ~~Exhibit~~Year ~~10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on September 8, 2011.~~End

	Option Awards									Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)(1)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Robert Glaser		73,333				$	0.36		7/7/2013
		33,333				$	0.36		3/31/2014
		40,000				$	0.36		4/4/2021
		26,667				$	0.36		10/7/2021
		50,000				$	0.36		3/27/2022
		31,272		95,553		$	0.25		12/31/2022
		–		12,500		$	0.16		3/31/2023

Keith Morlock		106,667				$	0.36		12/31/2017
		40,000				$	0.36		4/4/2021
		26,667				$	0.36		10/7/2021
		50,000				$	0.36		3/27/2022
		31,272		95,553		$	0.25		12/31/2022

Steve Ritchie		13,333				$	0.36		2/23/2014
		73,333				$	0.36		7/7/2013
		40,000				$	0.36		4/4/2021
		26,667				$	0.36		10/7/2021
		11,013		33,649		$	0.25		12/31/2022

Cynthia Glaser		8,333				$	0.36		3/31/2014

~~Index~~(1) On June 13, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company via unanimous written consent re-priced all of the stock options outstanding under our non-statutory stock options under the Corporation’s 2006, 2007 and 2010 incentive and non-statutory stock option plans at $0.36 per share of common stock of the Company. The Board of Directors re-priced such stock options to ~~Consolidated Financial~~keep ~~Statements~~such employees and consultants who were granted options incentivized. The re-pricing resulted in additional stock compensation expense recorded in general and administrative expense in the statement of operations for the Year ended March 31, 2013 of $6,453.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6 -- F-27

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTAND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS

27The following table sets forth the current common stock ownership of (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of five percent (5%) or more of our common based upon approximately 65,532,793 shares outstanding as of July 10, 2013, (ii) each officer and director of the Company individually, and (iii) all officers and directors of the Company as a group. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage of ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options and/or warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable, as appropriate, or will become exercisable within sixty (60) days of the reporting date are deemed outstanding, even if they have not actually been exercised. Those shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock shown, and all ownership is of record and beneficial. The address of each owner is in care of the Company at 2345 W Foothill Blvd., Suite 12, Upland, CA 91786.

~~REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM~~23

The Shareholders and Board of Directors

TITLE OF CLASS	NUMBER OF SHARES	NOTE	PERCENT OF CLASS	NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER
Common	36,737,253		56.1%	Horst Geicke
				15/F, AIA Central 1 Connaught Road Central Hong Kong

Common	18,493,284		28.2%	Grant King
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786

Common	1,073,756	(1, 3)	1.6%	Keith Morlock, CEO and Director
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786

Common	580,885	(1, 4)	0.9%	Robert Glaser, Former CEO and Director
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786

Common	213,239	(1, 5)	0.3%	Steve Ritchie, Director
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786

Common	1,150	(1)	(2)	Walter Ivison, Former Director
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786

Common	49,704	(1, 6)	0.1%	Cynthia Glaser, Former Principal Financial Officer
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786

Common	10,000	(1)	(2)	Bill Ball, Former Interim Chairman of Board of Directors
				2345 W. Foothill, Suite 12 Upland, CA 91786

Common	1,928,734	(1)	2.9%	Officers and Directors as a Group

~~Sustainable~~1. ~~Environmental~~All ~~Technologies~~officers ~~Corporation~~and directors as a group (6 persons) Amount to approximately 2.3% of the outstanding stock and 2.9% Beneficial Ownership.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended2. ~~These~~Less ~~consolidated~~than ~~financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management~~0. ~~Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits~~01%.

~~We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)~~3. ~~Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement~~Mr. ~~The~~Morlock ~~Company~~has ~~was not required to have~~766,683 ~~nor~~shares ~~were we engaged to perform, an audit~~ of ~~its~~common ~~internal~~stock ~~control~~issued ~~over~~and ~~financial reporting as of March 31~~307,073 ~~2012~~vested ~~and~~options ~~2011. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting~~ as ~~a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose~~ of ~~expressing~~July ~~an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly~~10, ~~we express no such opinion~~2013. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In4. ~~our~~Mr. ~~opinion,~~Glaser ~~the~~has ~~consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly~~580,885 inshares ~~all material respects, the consolidated financial position~~ of ~~Sustainable~~common ~~Environmental~~stock ~~Technologies~~issued ~~Corporation and subsidiaries~~ as of ~~March~~July 3110, ~~2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States~~2013.

~~dbbmckennon~~ 5. Mr. Ritchie has 103,750 shares of common stock issued and 109,489 vested options as of July 10, 2013.

~~Newport~~6. ~~Beach~~Mrs. Glaser has 49,704 ~~California~~shares of common stock issued as of July 10, 2013.

~~F-1~~During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had the following related party transactions:

~~SUSTAINABLE~~Horst ~~ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION~~Geicke

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Convertible ~~BALANCE~~Notes ~~SHEETS~~Payable to Horst Geicke and Related Entities

	As of March 31, 2012			As of March 31, 2011
Assets (Note 7)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,913,727		$	105,260
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,000 and $6,000, respectively		300,112			367,024
Prepaids and other current assets		39,383			36,962
Deferred tax asset		117,126			-
Current assets of discontinued operations		-			410
Total current assets		2,370,348			509,656
Property and equipment, net		2,153,374			1,989,892
Other assets		699,950			40,230
Investment, at cost		-			91,466
Intangible assets, net		248,443			434,519
Goodwill		66,188			66,188
Deferred tax assets, long-term		1,116,964			-
Total Assets	$	6,655,267		$	3,131,951
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	284,488		$	639,343
Accrued salaries, wages, and related party consulting fees		134,235			239,205
Accrued liabilities		178,086			337,905
Income taxes payable		59,200			25,823
Current portion of Related-party convertible notes payable, net of discount of $109,318 and $139,196, respectively		246,012			204,509
Notes payable		124,577			579,753
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		-			119,424
Total current liabilities		1,026,598			2,145,962
Related-party convertible notes payable, net of discount of $133,992 and $394,308, respectively		1,080,172			1,258,707
Notes payable, long-term		-			63,606
Warrant liability		119,846			247,284
Asset retirement obligation		9,900			9,900
Total liabilities		2,236,516			3,725,459
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,582,827 issued at March 31, 2012 and 2011, none outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 and 300,000,000 shares authorized; 16,458,524 and 14,649,296 issued; 16,458,524 and 14,629,962 outstanding at March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively		16,458			14,630
Additional paid-in capital		6,414,670			3,659,159
Accumulated deficit		(2,012,377	)		(4,267,297	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		4,418,751			(593,508	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$	6,655,267		$	3,131,951

On July 7, 2010, we assumed various convertible note agreements with an accredited investor and shareholder for proceeds totaling $775,000 and accrued interest of $50,000. In addition at the Effective Date, a discount on the convertible debt remained of $381,459. On July 7, 2010, the holder converted the note and accrued interest into 2,066,667 shares of our common stock. Upon conversion we, recorded the remaining discount to interest expense. In addition, all accrued interest of $50,000, was forgiven, and treated as a capital contribution due to the related party nature of the transaction as such recorded to additional paid in capital.

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~24

~~F-2~~Convertible Note Payable to Metropolitan Real Estate LLC

~~SUSTAINABLE~~ ~~ENVIRONMENTAL~~On ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~July ~~CORPORATION~~7, 2010, we entered into an agreement to acquire Pro Water Utah. In connection with the acquisition, the member of Pro Water Utah received a $2.0 million secured convertible promissory note payable over the period of one year from the closing date, incurring interest at 5% annually and a conversion feature at the option of the holder into shares of our common stock at a price of $1.50 per share. The note is secured by all the assets of Pro Water Utah. No beneficial conversion feature was recorded in connection with the note as the conversion price represented the closing price of our common stock on the date of the agreement. In addition, we recorded the $2,000,000 convertible note as a reduction to additional paid-in capital as it was deemed to be a return of capital initially contributed to Pro Water Utah by the member.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~On ~~STATEMENTS~~July OF12, ~~OPERATIONS~~2010, the terms of the acquisition were amended whereby the conversion rate of the $2,000,000 related secured convertible promissory note, which previously all converted at $1.50 at the option of the holder, such amended to so that $1,600,000 of the note may be converted at $3.00 per share and $400,000 may be converted at $0.375 per share. The convertible note was due based on the following: $100,000 paid on or before September 30, 2010, $200,000 paid on or before December 31, 2010, $200,000 paid on or before March 31, 2011 and the remaining amount of $1,500,000 with unpaid interest on or before June 30, 2011. The $100,000 payment due in September 2010 was paid in October 2010. On July 12, 2010, since the conversion price of $0.375 related to $400,000 was significantly less than the fair value of our common stock per the closing market price, a beneficial conversion feature was present. We valued the beneficial conversion feature as of the date of the amended agreement in the amount of $696,000, and recorded the maximum discount allowed of $400,000 against the note. The discount was being amortized over the term of the note using the straight line method due to the relatively short maturity of the note.

~~FOR~~On ~~THE~~January ~~YEARS~~14, ~~ENDED~~2011, ~~MARCH~~the terms of the convertible note were amended. As of the date of the amendment, the unpaid principal amount was $1,880,000. Under the terms of the new agreement, the term of the note was extended to five years and all accrued interest was forgiven. We are to make 60 monthly payments of $35,478 commencing January 2011 and concluding December 2015. All other terms, including conversion and interest rates remained the same. The effective interest rate for the year ended March 31, 2011 was 22%. Under ASC 470, Debt, we accounted for the change in terms of the debt as an extinguishment of the debt due to the significant change in the repayment period which impacted the expected cash flows in excess of 10%. Thus, the existing discount of $183,333 was removed and a new discount, with a beneficial conversion feature of $400,000 was recorded. Due to Geicke being a significant shareholder, no gain or loss was recorded and the result of the extinguishment was recorded to additional paid in capital. At March 31, 2012 ~~AND~~and 2011, the $243,310 and $382,455 unamortized discount on the note was allocated between short and long term based on the expected annual amortization of which $109,318 and $139,196 has been allocated to short-term portion with the remaining $133,992 and $394,308 allocated to long-term portion. During the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $109,228 and $139,146 of the discount to interest expense, respectively, using the effective interest method. The note holder requested the principal payments for November and December 2011 and January and February 2012 be deferred. Therefore, payments are added on to the end of the term. The following is the expected amortization for the remaining discount under the effective interest rate method for the years ending March 31: $77,964, $45,005, and $11,023 in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. The note was converted to common stock subsequent to year end. See Note 6.

	For the Year Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Revenues:
Water processing	$	3,510,837		$	2,390,998
Reclaimed oil		758,692			226,402
Total revenues		4,269,529			2,617,400
Cost of revenues:
Water processing		1,376,166			849,461
Reclaimed oil		229,081			170,744
Total cost of revenues		1,605,247			1,020,205
Gross profit		2,664,282			1,597,195
Operating expenses:
General and administrative		1,997,968			1,298,115
Research and development		125,292			53,782
Total operating expenses		2,123,260			1,351,897
Operating income		541,022			245,298
Other income (expense):
Interest income		755			75
Interest expense		(303,514	)		(739,721	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		127,438			(102,584	)
Other, net		704,783			167,592
Total other expense, net		529,462			(674,638	)
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes		1,070,484			(429,340	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(1,170,275	)		800
Net income (loss) from continuing operations		2,240,759			(430,140	)
Net income from discontinued operations		14,161			74,701
Net income (loss)	$	2,254,920		$	(355,439	)
Basic net income (loss) available to common stockholders:
Continuing operations	$	0.17		$	(0.03	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.00		$	0.01
Net income (loss)	$	0.17		$	(0.02	)
Diluted net income (loss) available to common stockholders:
Continuing operations	$	0.14		$	(0.03	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.00		$	0.01
Net income (loss)	$	0.14		$	(0.02	)
Weighted average shares - basic		15,028,294			10,943,753
Weighted average shares - diluted		17,313,252			10,943,753

Horst Geicke

~~The~~See ~~accompanying~~Notes ~~notes~~6 ~~are~~and an13 ~~integral~~for ~~part~~transactions with Horst Geicke, a significant shareholder of ~~these~~the ~~consolidated~~Company ~~financial~~and ~~statements~~former member of Pro Water Utah.

~~F-3~~Robert Glaser

~~SUSTAINABLE~~On ~~ENVIRONMENTAL~~July ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~7, ~~CORPORATION~~2010, we granted 73,333 stock options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price of $0.375 per share. The options vest over one year. On January 13, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 33,333 shares of common stock valued at $22,500 to Robert Glaser as discretionary compensation bonuses. Compensation bonuses for stock came from the equity bonus plan. On March 31, 2011 we granted 33,333 stock options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price of $0.75 per share according to his employment contract. The options vest over one year.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~On ~~STATEMENTS~~April OF4, ~~STOCKHOLDERS'~~2011, ~~EQUITY~~we granted 40,000 stock options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The options vest over one year. On October 7, 2011, we granted 26,667 stock options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price of $1.20 per share. The options vest over one year. On March 27, 2012, we granted common stock to three board members which vest over a twenty-four (~~DEFICIT~~24) month period, starting April 1, 2012 and then the first of each quarter thereafter (ending January 1, 2014). Under the agreement, we agreed to issue 150,000 shares of common stock to Robert Glaser. See Note 10 for additional information. On March 31, 2012, we granted 50,000 stock options to Robert Glaser with an exercise price of $1.20 per share according to his employment contract. The options vest over one year.

~~FOR~~See ~~THE~~Notes ~~YEARS~~8, ~~ENDED~~9, ~~MARCH~~and 3110 for transactions with Robert Glaser, ~~2012~~the ~~AND~~Company’s ~~2011~~ former Chief Executive Officer and director on the Board of Directors.

	Common Stock						Additional			Accumulated			Total Stockholders'
	Shares			Amount			Paid-in Capital			Deficit			Equity (Deficit)
Balances - March 31, 2010		2,222,222		$	2,222		$	1,727,778		$	(28,483	)	$	1,701,517
Contributed capital		-			-			150,000			-			150,000
Convertible note payable issued in connection with Pro Water acquisition, including discount of $400,000 for beneficial conversion feature		-			-			(1,600,000	)		-			(1,600,000	)
Reverse acquisition of SET Corp		7,132,193			7,132			99,851			(3,883,375	)		(3,776,392	)
Stock issued for conversion of convertible notes payable		2,066,667			2,067			822,933			-			825,000
Stock issued for cash		468,000			468			207,532			-			208,000
Common stock issued to related parties for services, accrued wages and consulting fees		2,487,833			2,488			1,038,902			-			1,041,390
Common stock issued for services		39,714			40			13,005			-			13,045
Common stock issued in connection with asset acquisition/cost basis investment		133,333			133			99,867			-			100,000
Fair market value of warrants issued in connection with asset acquisition/cost basis investment		-			-			233,599			-			233,599
Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities		80,000			80			485,309			-			485,389
Debt extinguishment		-			-			265,612			-			265,612
Stock-based compensation		-			-			114,771			-			114,771
Net loss		-			-			-			(355,439	)		(355,439	)
Balances - March 31, 2011		14,629,962			14,630			3,659,159			(4,267,297	)		(593,508	)
Stock issued for cash		1,500,000			1,500			2,299,750			-			2,301,250
Cashless Exercise of stock options		20,000			20			14,980			-			15,000
Repurchase of stock options		-			-			(8,000	)		-			(8,000	)
Repurchase of common stock		(3,333	)		(3	)		(3,827	)		-			(3,830	)
Common stock issued to related parties for consulting fees		266,666			266			199,734			-			200,000
Common stock issued for services		40,050			40			46,520			-			46,560
Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities		5,179			5			10,095			-			10,100
Amendment of WES Acquisition		-			-			(183,123	)		-			(183,123	)
Stock-based compensation		-			-			379,382			-			379,382
Net income		-			-			-			2,254,920			2,254,920
Balances - March 31, 2012		16,458,524		$	16,458		$	6,414,670		$	(2,012,377	)	$	4,418,751

Cynthia Glaser

~~The~~On ~~accompanying~~January ~~notes~~13, ~~are~~2011, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 10,000 shares of common stock valued at $6,750 to Cynthia Glaser as discretionary compensation bonuses. Compensation bonuses for stock came from the equity bonus plan. On March 31, 2011 the Company we granted 8,333 stock options to Cynthia Glaser with an ~~integral~~exercise ~~part~~price of ~~these~~$0.75 ~~consolidated~~per ~~financial~~share ~~statements~~according to her employment contract. The options vest over one year.

~~F-4~~25

~~SUSTAINABLE~~At ~~ENVIRONMENTAL~~March ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~31, ~~CORPORATION~~2011, we owed an entity controlled by Cynthia and Robert Glaser $24,085 for management services previously provided under a consulting contract. Payments to this entity during the year ended March 31, 2011 were $54,500.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~On ~~STATEMENTS~~March OF31, ~~CASH~~2012, ~~FLOWS~~we granted 8,333 stock options to Cynthia Glaser with an exercise price of $0.75 per share according to her employment contract. The options vest over one year.

~~FOR~~At ~~THE~~March ~~YEARS~~31, ~~ENDED~~2012, ~~MARCH~~we owed an entity controlled by Cynthia and Robert Glaser $0 for management services previously provided under a consulting contract. Payments to this entity during the year ended March 31, 2012 ~~AND~~were ~~2011~~ $24,085.

	For the Year Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	2,254,920		$	(355,439	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of debt discounts related to beneficial conversion features and warrants		143,511			621,782
Gain on settlement of note payable and accrued interest		(624,909	)
Income tax benefit		(1,234,090	)		-
Loss on divestiture of asset held for sale		-			30,000
Settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities treated as contributed capital		-			400,000
Loss on disposal of assets		28,256			-
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(127,438	)		102,584
Depreciation and amortization		196,167			125,701
Stock-based compensation		640,942			114,771
Gain on settlement of accounts payable		(140,625	)		-
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		66,912			(152,571	)
Prepaid expenses		(662,141	)		(47,318	)
Accounts payable		(175,204	)		(158,860	)
Accrued liabilities		(149,688	)		(62,710	)
Income taxes payable		33,377			(51,399	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		249,990			566,541
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(346,803	)		(858,509	)
Cash provided by reverse acquisition		-			36,040
Net cash used in investing activities		(346,803	)		(822,469	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Contributed capital		-			150,000
Proceeds from sale of common stock		2,301,250			208,000
Repurchase of common stock		(3,830	)		-
Repurchase of stock options		(8,000	)		-
Payments on related party convertible note payable		(227,226	)		(203,280	)
Payments on notes payable		(156,914	)		(74,432	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,905,280			80,288
Net increase in cash		1,808,467			(175,640	)
Cash - beginning of year		105,260			280,900
Cash - end of year	$	1,913,727		$	105,260
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	98,485		$	24,722
Income taxes	$	30,438		$	51,399
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of common stock in settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	10,100		$	1,539,824
Issuance of convertible note, common stock, and warrants for cost investment and pending patents	$	140,000		$	376,440
Issuance of common stock in connection with convertible debt and accrued interest	$	-		$	825,000
Fair value of beneficial conversion feature recorded on Pro Water note	$	-		$	400,000
Purchase of equipment with note payable	$	-		$	66,035
Issuance of convertible note in connection with Pro Water Acquisition	$	-		$	200,000

See Notes 8, 9, and 10 for transactions with Cynthia Glaser, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.

~~The~~Keith ~~accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~Morlock

~~F-5~~On July 7, 2010, we granted 73,333 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $0.375 per share. The options vest over one year. On January 13, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 33,333 shares of common stock valued at $22,500 to Keith Morlock as discretionary compensation bonuses. Compensation bonuses for stock came from the equity bonus plan. On March 31, 2011 we granted 33,333 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share according to his employment contract. The options vest over one year.

~~SUSTAINABLE~~At ~~ENVIRONMENTAL~~March ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~31, ~~CORPORATION~~2011, we owed an entity controlled by Keith Morlock $35,411 for management services previously provided under a consulting contract. Payments to this entity during the year ended March 31, 2011 were $16,500.

~~NOTES~~On TOApril ~~CONSOLIDATED~~4, ~~FINANCIAL~~2011, ~~STATEMENTS~~we granted 40,000 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The options vest over one year. On October 7, 2011, we granted 26,667 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $1.20 per share. The options vest over one year. On March 27, 2002, we granted common stock to three board members which vest over a twenty-four (24) month period, starting April 1, 2012 and then the first of each quarter thereafter (ending January 1, 2014). Under the agreement, we agreed to issue 150,000 shares of common stock to Keith Morlock. See Note 10 for additional information. On March 31, 2012, we granted 50,000 stock options to Keith Morlock with an exercise price of $1.20 per share according to his employment contract. The options vest over one year.

~~Note~~At 1March –31, ~~Organization~~2012, the ~~History~~company ~~and~~owed ~~Significant~~an ~~Accounting~~entity ~~Policies~~controlled ~~and~~by ~~Procedures~~Keith Morlock $0 for management services previously provided under a consulting contract. Payments to this entity during the year ended March 31, 2012 were $29,500.

~~Organization~~See Notes 8, 9, and ~~History~~10 for transactions with Keith Morlock, the Company’s interim Chief Executive Officer and director on the Board of Directors.

~~Sustainable~~Grant Environmental Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries (collectively the “Company” or “SET Corp” without the use of personal pronouns) is dedicated to responsible resource utilization through the strategic balance of Environmental, Societal and Economic growth. Headquartered in Southern California, SET Corp is setting the standard for responsible principles of Sustainable Development. These steadfast values are evident through patented technologies and strategic acquisitions, which solve environmental issues with an economic advantage. SET Corp limits their customer’s environmental impact while conserving valuable and diminishing resources that are essential to future generations.King

~~Current~~On ~~and~~July ~~future~~7, ~~services include~~2010, ~~and~~we ~~are~~issued ~~expected~~933,333 toshares ~~include~~of its ~~innovative~~common ~~echo-technologies~~stock ~~that~~to ~~provide~~Grant ~~patented treatment~~King, ~~recovery,~~the ~~reclamation~~Company’s ~~and~~former ~~re-injection~~Chief ~~services~~Executive ~~for~~Officer ~~produced~~and ~~water~~Director ~~(associated~~in ~~with~~exchange for the ~~oil~~conversion of ~~and~~$357,000 ~~gas~~of ~~industry)~~unpaid, accrued and ~~complete~~other ~~sustainable~~compensations ~~energy~~due ~~solutions~~to ~~that~~Mr. ~~that~~King. ~~bridge~~On the ~~gap~~Effective ~~between~~Date, ~~existing~~we ~~energy~~granted ~~inefficient~~73,333 ~~buildings~~stock ~~and~~options to ~~the~~Grant ~~sustainable~~King ~~development~~with ~~and~~an ~~design~~exercise ~~needs~~price of ~~tomorrow~~$0.375 per share. The options vest over one year.

InOn ~~addition~~January to13, ~~these~~2011, ~~areas~~the Board of ~~expertise~~Directors approved ~~SET~~the ~~Corp~~issuance ~~provides~~of ~~customized services that include design~~20,000 ~~construction~~shares ~~management,~~of ~~operation~~common ~~and~~stock ~~maintenance~~valued ~~services~~at $13,500 ~~and~~to ~~equipment~~Grant ~~manufacturing~~King ~~for~~as ~~industrial~~discretionary ~~and~~compensation ~~municipal sectors~~bonuses. ~~With~~ ~~strategic~~Compensation bonuses ~~partnerships,~~for ~~through~~stock ~~prominent~~came ~~global~~from ~~manufacturers~~the ~~and~~equity ~~distributors,~~bonus ~~SET Corp has access to a worldwide sales and distribution network~~plan.

~~Acquisitions~~On March 27, 2012, we granted 75,000 bonus stock options to Grant King with an exercise price of $1.30. The options vest over one year.

~~Acquisition~~See Note 6 for discussion regarding the conversion of the Bridgewell Worldwide Limited Note.

OnITEM July 7, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), SET Corp entered into an agreement to acquire Pro Water, LLC ("PWU"), a Utah limited liability company (formerly a Colorado limited liability company) with its sole equity member Metropolitan Real Estate LLC (the “Member), a New York limited liability company14. ~~Pro~~PRINCIPAL ~~Water~~ACCOUNTANT ~~owns~~FEES ~~and~~AND operates a Blue Bench Class II salt water disposal ("SWD") well in Duchesne, Utah; the operations were assumed by the Member on October 1, 2009 (“Inception”). Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of PWU from its sole member, and PWU became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant in exchange for the payment of 1,333,333 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock, a secured convertible promissory note payable quarterly over the period of one year from the closing date in the amount of $2.0 million, with an interest rate of 5% and a conversion feature at the option of the holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.50 per share, and the assumption of Pro Water debts. The note is secured by all the assets of PWU and the wastewater treatment facility owned by SET Corp. Metropolitan Real Estate LLC is an entity controlled by Horst Franz Geicke, a significant shareholder of the Company.SERVICES

OnDetail ~~July 12, 2010, the terms~~ of ~~the~~fees ~~acquisition were amended whereby the number of shares of common stock~~ paid ~~for PWU was increased~~ to 2,222,222 (from 1,333,333), and the conversion rate of the $2,000,000 related secured convertible promissory note, which previously all converted at $1.50 at the option of the holder, such amended to so that $1,600,000 of the note may be converted at $3.00 per share and $400,000 may be converted at $0.375 per share. The convertible note is due based on the followingdbbmckennon: $100,000 paid on or before September 30, 2010, $200,000 paid on or before December 31, 2010, $200,000 paid on or before March 31, 2011 and the remaining amount of $1,500,000 with unpaid interest on or before June 30, 2011. The $100,000 payment due in September 2010 was paid in October 2010.

Ona. ~~January~~Audit ~~14,~~Fees: ~~2011,~~Aggregate ~~the~~fees ~~terms~~billed offor ~~the~~professional ~~convertible~~services ~~note~~rendered ~~were~~for ~~amended.~~the Asaudit of ~~the~~our ~~date~~annual offinancial ~~the~~statements ~~amendment,~~for the ~~unpaid~~periods ~~principal~~ended ~~amount~~March ~~was $1~~31,~~880,000.~~ ~~Under~~2013 ~~the~~and ~~terms~~2012, ofwere ~~the~~approximately ~~new agreement~~$85,000 ~~the term of the note was extended to five years~~ and ~~all~~$105,000, ~~accrued~~respectively. ~~interest was forgiven~~b. ~~The~~Audit-Related ~~Company~~Fees: isAggregate tofees ~~make~~billed 60for ~~monthly~~review ~~payments~~ of ~~$35,478~~the ~~commencing~~Company’s ~~January~~SEC ~~2011~~comment ~~and~~letters ~~concluding December 2015, see Note 7~~ for ~~minor~~the ~~modification~~periods ~~made~~ended toMarch ~~the~~31, ~~convertible~~2013 ~~note~~and ~~during fiscal~~ 2012., ~~All~~were ~~other~~approximately ~~terms~~$7,000 ~~including conversion~~ and ~~interest~~$5,000. ~~rates~~c. ~~remained~~Tax ~~the same~~Fees. ~~The~~Fees ~~Company~~billed ~~accounted~~ for ~~the~~tax ~~change~~services inwere ~~terms~~approximately of$9,000 ~~the~~and ~~debt~~$10,500 asfor ~~an extinguishment of~~ the ~~debt~~periods ~~due~~ended toMarch ~~the~~31, ~~significant~~2013 ~~change~~and in2012, ~~the repayment period~~respectively. ~~See Note 7 for additional information.~~

The acquisition of PWU was accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805 Business Combinations. The Company determined for accounting and reporting purposes that Pro Water is the acquirer because of the significant holdings and influence of the control group of Pro Water before and after the acquisition. As a result of the transaction the Pro Water control group owns in excess of 44% of issued and outstanding common stock of SET Corp on a diluted basis. In addition, in connection with the acquisition certain members of management were required to sign voting agreements. As of January, these voting agreements expired. The control group of Pro Water could elect or appoint or to remove a majority of the members of the governing body of the Company due to the significant holdings of the Company’s common stock. The control group of Pro Water could have influence on the organization as they have provided funding for operations of SET Corp, prior to the acquisition, in an attempt to settle debts prior to the reverse acquisition. In addition, the Pro Water control group initially had a $2.0 million note payable, approximately $1,800,000, at March 31, 2011 in which additional influence can be subjected. In addition, Pro Water is significantly larger than SET Corp in terms of assets and operations. Additionally, the future operations of PWU will be the Company intended primary operations and more indicative of the operations of the consolidated entity on a go forward basis.26

FAudit Committee Pre-6Approval Policies and Procedures

~~Accordingly,~~Our ~~the~~Board ~~assets and liabilities~~ of ~~PWU~~Directors ~~are~~who ~~reported~~acts atas ~~historical costs and~~ the ~~historical~~Audit Committee ~~results~~has ofpolicies ~~PWU~~and ~~will~~procedures bethat ~~reflected~~require inthe ~~this~~pre-approval ~~and~~by ~~future~~the ~~SET~~Audit ~~Corp~~Committee ~~filings~~of asall afees ~~change~~paid into, ~~reporting entity. The assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~all ofservices performed ~~SET~~by, ~~Corp~~our ~~will~~independent beaccounting ~~reported~~firms. atAt ~~fair value on~~ the ~~date~~beginning of ~~acquisition~~each year, ~~and~~the ~~results~~Audit ofCommittee ~~operations~~approves ~~will~~the beproposed ~~reported~~services, including ~~from~~ the ~~date~~nature, oftype ~~acquisition. The assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~scope of ~~SET~~services ~~Corp~~contemplated ~~were~~and ~~reported~~the atrelated ~~their carrying values~~fees, ~~which~~to ~~approximated~~be ~~fair~~rendered ~~value,~~by ~~and~~these nofirms ~~goodwill~~during ~~was~~the ~~recorded~~year. In ~~The~~addition, ~~results~~Audit ofCommittee ~~SET~~pre-approval ~~Corp~~is ~~have~~also ~~been~~required ~~included~~for inthose ~~the~~engagements ~~accompanying~~that ~~consolidated~~may ~~financial~~arise ~~statements~~during ~~from~~ the ~~Effective~~course ~~Date.~~of ~~The~~the ~~following~~year isthat are aoutside ~~schedule~~the scope of ~~SET~~the ~~Corp’s~~initial ~~assets~~services and ~~liabilities~~fees atpre-approved by the ~~Effective~~Audit ~~Date:~~Committee.

Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	35,630
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		9,827
Current assets of discontinued operations		3,503
Property and equipment		24,667
Other assets		10,231
Assets of discontinued operations, long term		30,000
Total Assets		113,858
Liabilities:
Accounts payable		747,023
Accrued liabilities		1,149,763
State income taxes payable		77,223
Notes payable		455,500
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		230,738
Accounts payable, long term		11,883
Accrued liabilities, long term		684,879
Convertible notes payable, long term		388,541
Warrant liability		144,700
Total Liabilities		3,890,250
Net liabilities in excess of assets	$	(3,776,392	)

Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 100% of the fees and services provided as noted above were authorized and approved by the Audit Committee in compliance with the pre-approval policies and procedures described herein.

~~Since~~ITEM ~~PWU assumed operations on Inception due to the change in reporting entity, there are no reportable periods in 2009 to compare to those periods reported herein for 2010~~15. ~~The~~ ~~excess~~EXHIBITS ~~liabilities~~AND ~~assumed~~FINANCIAL ~~were~~STATEMENT ~~accounted for as a deemed distribution through a charge to the Company’s accumulated deficit.~~SCHEDULES

~~The~~See ~~following~~Exhibit ~~unaudited~~Index ~~pro forma information was prepared as if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the period for the year ended March 31, 2011:~~below.

	Pro-Forma Combined
	For the Year Ended March 31, 2011
Revenue	$	2,617,400
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(756,814	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted - continuing operations	$	(0.00	)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, duly authorized.

MultiGen Acquisition

	SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL TEHCHOLOGIES CORPOATION

Dated: July 15, 2013	/s/ Keith Morlock
	By: Keith Morlock,
	Chief Executive Officer

Dated: July 15, 2013	/s/ Allan Viernes
	By: Allan Viernes
	Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

OnPursuant ~~August~~to ~~27,~~the ~~2010,~~requirements weof ~~entered~~the ~~into~~Securities aand ~~“Technology~~Exchange ~~Purchase~~Act of ~~Agreement” with World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd~~1934, anthis ~~Australian~~Report has ~~company~~been ~~(“WES”). In~~signed ~~exchange~~below ~~for~~by anthe ~~investment~~following inpersons ~~WES,~~on webehalf ~~purchased certain technologies, including all intellectual property rights and pending patents~~ of ~~WES. Such~~the ~~patents~~registrant and ~~patent~~in ~~applications~~the ~~include~~capacities ~~patent application number 20088237617~~ and on ~~patent application number 2010228129. Both patent applications relate to~~ the ~~water~~dates ~~extraction and electricity generation units as referred to as MultiGen~~indicated.

F-7

Signature	Title	Date


/s/ Keith Morlock	Director	July 15, 2013
Keith Morlock

Effective September 1, 2011, we entered into an amendment with WES to the aforementioned Technology Purchase Agreement (“Amendment to the TPA”). Pursuant to the terms of the Amendment to the TPA: (i) SET Corp’s option to purchase 3% of the capital stock of WES has been canceled; (ii) WES’ warrant to purchase 333,333 shares of SET Corp’s common stock at a price of $5.25 per share has been canceled; (iii) WES’ $200,000 convertible secured promissory note issued by SET Corp. (convertible at $5.25 per share of SET Corp’s common stock), and all security interests granted there under, has been canceled; (iv) SET Corp’s ownership of 12% of the capital stock of WES has been canceled; (v) SET Corp’s payment to WES upon certain terms of WES’ successful installation and sale of a MultiGen unit has been reduced to 250,000 shares of SET Corp’s common stock; (vi) the maximum share issuance by SET Corp to WES based on WES royalties paid to SET Corp for certain WES sales of MultiGen units has been reduced to 333,333 shares of SET Corp’s common stock; (vii) any shares of SET Corp common stock issued to WES pursuant to the Agreement, as amended, shall be restricted from transfer for one year from the date of issuance; (viii) SET Corp maximum royalty obligation to WES for SET Corp sales of MultiGen units has been reduced to $500,000; (ix) WES shall pay SET Corp a royalty of 10% of gross revenues for WES sales of MultiGen units; (x) WES and SET Corp shall split 75/25 certain fees paid to WES in connection with agency for sales of MultiGen units outside of Australia; and (xi) the parties have covenanted to use their best efforts in regards to maintaining distributor status for sourcing components for the MultiGen units; WES retained 133,333 shares of common stock issued in connection with the original agreement. See Notes 2, 4, and 8 for additional information.

/s/ Steve Ritchie		Director		July 15, 2013
Steve Ritchie

Due to the significant change in the terms of the Technology Purchase Agreement, the Company determined that the Amendment to the TPA represented the establishment of a new agreement. Thus, the Company revalued the 133,333 shares of common stock issued to WES on the date of the Amendment to the TPA resulting in a value of $140,000 being applied to the pending patents. The Company determined that the fair market value of the common stock issued was more representative of fair value than the pending patents received. The net difference between removing the fair value of the items issued under the old Technology Purchase Agreement and the Amendment to the TPA were classified as additional paid in capital, thus, no gain or loss was recorded on the transaction.27

~~Note~~EXHIBIT ~~2 – Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation~~INDEX

Principles of Consolidation

Exhibit Number	Description

3(i)	Restated Articles of Incorporation (1)
3(ii)	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (7)
3(ii)	Amended and Restated Bylaws (1)
3(iv)	Amended and Restated Bylaws (8)
10.1	Pro Water Acquisition Agreement and Convertible Secured Promissory Note (2)
10.2	Amendment No. 1 to Pro Water Acquisition Agreement (3)
10.3	Technology Purchase Agreement with World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd. (4)
10.4	Amendment to Convertible Secured Promissory Note (5)
10.5	Amendment to Technology Purchase Agreement with World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd. (6)
10.6	Amendment No. 1 to the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Asset Purchase Agreement (9)
10.7	Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement (10)
21.1	Subsidiaries
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL*	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

~~The~~* ~~consolidated~~Pursuant ~~financial~~to ~~statements~~Rule ~~include~~406T ~~the~~of ~~assets~~Regulation S-T, ~~liabilities~~the ~~and~~interactive ~~operating~~data files ~~results~~on ofExhibit ~~the~~101 ~~Company~~hereto ~~and~~are ~~its~~deemed ~~wholly-owned~~not ~~subsidiaries,~~filed ~~PWU,~~or ~~ProWater,~~part ~~LLC,~~of a ~~Colorado~~ ~~limited~~registration ~~liability~~statement ~~company~~or ~~("PWC"),~~prospectus ~~and~~for ~~SET~~purposes IPof ~~Holdings~~Sections ~~LLC,~~11 or a12 ~~Utah~~of ~~limited~~the ~~liability~~Securities ~~company~~Act ~~("Set~~of ~~IP")~~1933, ~~after~~as ~~elimination~~amended, ofare ~~all~~deemed ~~material~~not ~~inter-company~~filed ~~accounts~~for ~~and~~purposes ~~transactions.~~of OCSection ~~Energy~~18 ~~and~~of ~~balances~~the ~~related~~Securities toExchange ~~the~~Act of ~~Company’s~~1934, ~~former~~as ~~wastewater~~amended, ~~treatment~~and ~~plant~~otherwise are ~~classified~~not assubject ~~discontinued~~to ~~operations~~liability under those sections.

Estimates

(1)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(i) and Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on June 29, 2012.
(2)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 1.01 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 9, 2010
(3)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on July 14, 2010.
(4)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on September 3, 2010.
(5)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2011.
(6)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on September 8, 2011.
(7)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(i) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on December 31, 2012.
(8)	Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on December 31, 2012.
(9)	Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed on November 16, 2012.
(10)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on April 22, 2013.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the valuation of derivatives, equity instruments such as options and warrants, provision for income taxes and the realization of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.28

~~Fair~~Index ~~Value~~to of Consolidated Financial ~~Instruments~~Statements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. Applicable accounting guidance provides an established hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-6 - F-24

~~Level 1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.~~29

~~Level~~REPORT 2OF -INDEPENDENT ~~Include~~REGISTERED ~~other~~PUBLIC ACCOUNTING ~~inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.~~FIRM

~~Level~~The 3Shareholders -and ~~Unobservable~~Board ~~inputs~~of ~~which are supported by little or no market activity.~~Directors

~~The~~Sustainable ~~fair~~Environmental ~~value~~Technologies hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Derivative instruments include the warrant liability (Level 2). Derivative instruments are valued using standard calculations/models that are primarily based on observable inputs, including volatilities and interest rates. Therefore, derivative instruments are included in Level 2.Corporation

~~F-8~~We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

~~Fair-value~~We ~~estimates~~conducted ~~discussed~~our ~~herein~~audits ~~are~~in ~~based~~accordance ~~upon~~with the ~~certain~~standards ~~market~~of ~~assumptions~~the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and ~~pertinent~~perform the ~~information~~audit ~~available~~to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to ~~management~~have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~ 2012. ~~The~~Our ~~respective~~audits ~~carrying~~included ~~value~~consideration of ~~certain~~internal ~~on-balance-sheet~~control over financial ~~instruments~~reporting ~~approximated~~as ~~their~~a ~~fair~~basis ~~values.~~for ~~These~~designing audit ~~financial~~procedures ~~instruments~~that ~~include~~are ~~cash,~~appropriate ~~prepaids~~in the circumstances, ~~accounts~~but ~~payable~~not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, ~~accrued~~we ~~liabilities~~express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on ~~notes~~a ~~payable~~test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and ~~convertible~~disclosures ~~notes~~in ~~payable~~the financial statements. ~~Fair~~An ~~values~~audit ~~for~~also ~~these~~includes ~~items~~assessing the ~~were~~accounting ~~assumed~~principles toused ~~approximate~~and ~~carrying~~significant ~~values~~estimates ~~because~~made ofby ~~their~~management, ~~short~~as ~~term~~well inas ~~nature~~evaluating orthe ~~they~~overall ~~are~~financial ~~payable~~statement presentation. onWe ~~demand~~believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~The~~In ~~following~~our ~~table~~opinion, ~~presents~~ the ~~Company’s~~consolidated ~~fair~~financial statements ~~value~~referred ~~hierarchy~~to ~~for~~above ~~assets~~present ~~and~~fairly, ~~liabilities~~in ~~measured~~all atmaterial ~~fair~~respects, ~~value~~the onconsolidated afinancial ~~recurring~~position ~~basis~~of atSustainable Environmental Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2013 and 2012:, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,913,727	$	-	$	-	$	1,913,727
Total assets measured at fair value	$	1,913,727	$	-	$	-	$	1,913,727
Liabilities
Derivative instruments	$	-	$	119,846	$	-	$	119,846
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	-	$	119,846	$	-	$	119,846

/s/ dbbmckennon

~~The following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2011:~~dbbmckennon

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	105,260	$	-	$	-	$	105,260
Total assets measured at fair value	$	105,260	$	-	$	-	$	105,260
Liabilities
Derivative instruments	$	-	$	247,284	$	-	$	247,284
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	-	$	247,284	$	-	$	247,284

Newport Beach, California

~~The~~July ~~Company measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets include cost method investments when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired~~15, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition or in a nonmonetary exchange, and property and equipment and intangible assets that are written down to fair value when they are held for sale or determined to be impaired. During the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company did not have any significant assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition.2013

~~Concentrations~~F-1

~~Credit~~SUSTAINABLE ~~Risk~~ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

AtCONSOLIDATED ~~times,~~BALANCE the Company maintains cash balances at a financial institution in excess of the $250,000 FDIC insurance limit. In addition, at times the Company extends credit to customers in the normal course of business, after an evaluation of the credit worthiness. The Company does not expect to take any unnecessary credit risks causing significant causing write-offs of potentially uncollectible accounts. The Company also maintains reserves for potential credit losses. The Company considers the following factors when determining if collection of a fee is reasonably assured: customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends and changes in customer payment terms.SHEETS

Customer

	As of March 31,			As of March 31,
	2013			2012
Assets (Note 6)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	63,767		$	1,913,727
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,000 and $6,000, respectively		428,853			300,112
Prepaids and other current assets		51,870			39,383
Deferred tax assets		42,279			117,126
Total current assets		586,769			2,370,348

Property and equipment, net		9,937,616			2,153,374
Other assets		110,742			699,950
Intangible assets, net		101,248			248,443
Goodwill		66,188			66,188
Deferred tax assets, long-term		512,681			1,116,964

Total Assets	$	11,315,244		$	6,655,267

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	3,346,572		$	284,488
Accrued salaries, wages, and related party consulting fees		71,010			134,235
Accrued liabilities		263,962			178,086
Income taxes payable		–			59,200
Related party convertible notes payable, net of discount of $0 and $109,318, respectively		–			246,012
Notes payable		61,877			124,577
Total current liabilities		3,743,421			1,026,598

Related party convertible notes payable, long-term, net of discount of $134,082 and $133,992, respectively		1,170,584			1,080,172
Related party notes payable		2,300,000			–
Warrant liability		–			119,846
Other long-term liabilities		112,548			9,900
Total liabilities		7,326,553			2,236,516

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)

Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,582,827 issued at March 31, 2013 and 2012, none outstanding		–			–
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 17,120,358 and 16,458,524 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively		17,121			16,458
Additional paid-in capital		7,259,074			6,414,670
Accumulated deficit		(3,287,504	)		(2,012,377	)
Total stockholders' equity		3,988,691			4,418,751

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	11,315,244		$	6,655,267

The ~~geographic~~accompanying ~~location~~notes ~~of the injection well is a direct factor with relation to the radius of customer’s wells that can be economically serviced. While there~~ are ~~several~~an ~~key~~integral ~~factors to obtaining new business, the ratio~~ part of ~~available~~these ~~business~~consolidated per customer is based solely on the number of wells the customer has within the serviceable radius of the injection well. As new gas wells are developed within the serviceable radius of the well, the ratio of customers to percentage of business will decrease. Until new wells are developed the expected customer to business ratio are not expected to change. During year ended March 31, 2012, the Company had one (1) customer that accounted for approximately 81% of its revenue and 84% of its accounts receivable at March 31, 2012. During year ended March 31, 2011, the Company had one (1) customer that accounted for approximately 86% of its revenue and 92% of its accounts receivable at March 31, 2011. The loss of our injection well customer would have a significant impact on the Company’s financial ~~results~~statements. ~~In addition, we are selling our reclaimed oil to one customer. If there was an issue with this customer, we have additional oil customers that would potentially take this position.~~

F-92

~~Cash~~SUSTAINABLE ~~Equivalents~~ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

~~All~~CONSOLIDATED ~~highly-liquid~~STATEMENTS ~~investments~~OF ~~with a maturity of three (3) months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.~~OPERATIONS

~~Property~~FOR ~~and~~THE ~~Equipment~~YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 AND 2012

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. The estimated lives of property and equipment are as follows:

	For the Year Ended March 31,
	2013			2012
Revenues:
Water processing	$	2,964,940		$	3,510,837
Reclaimed oil		440,747			758,692
Total revenues		3,405,687			4,269,529

Cost of revenues:
Water processing		1,262,332			1,376,166
Reclaimed oil		176,037			229,081
Total cost of revenues		1,438,369			1,605,247

Gross profit		1,967,318			2,664,282

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		2,448,192			1,997,968
Research and development		–			125,292
Impairment of intangible assets		108,335			–
Total operating expenses		2,556,527			2,123,260

Operating income (loss)		(589,209	)		541,022

Other income (expense):
Interest income		690			755
Interest expense		(191,954	)		(303,514	)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		119,846			127,438
Other, net		57,571			704,783
Total other income (expense), net		(13,847	)		529,462

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes		(603,056	)		1,070,484

Provision (benefit) for income taxes		672,071			(1,170,275	)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		(1,275,127	)		2,240,759

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		–			14,161
Net income (loss)	$	(1,275,127	)	$	2,254,920

Basic and diluted net income (loss) available to common shareholders
Continuing operations	$	(0.08	)	$	0.17
Discontinued operations	$	–		$	–
Net income (loss)	$	(0.08	)	$	0.17

Diluted net income (loss) available to common stockholders:
Continuing operations	$	(0.08	)	$	0.14
Discontinued operations	$	–		$	–
Net income (loss)	$	(0.08	)	$	0.14
Weighted average shares - basic		16,831,357			15,028,294
Weighted average shares - diluted		16,831,357			17,313,252

Injection well	20 years
Machinery and equipment, furniture and equipment	Five to ten years
Buildings	25 years
Land	not depreciated

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

~~Impairment of Long~~F-~~Lived and Purchased Intangible Assets~~3

~~The~~SUSTAINABLE ~~Company~~ENVIRONMENTAL ~~has~~TECHNOLOGIES adopted ASC 350 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undercounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 350 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.CORPORATION

~~Long-lived~~CONSOLIDATED ~~assets,~~STATEMENTS ~~such~~OF as property and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value. Estimates of expected future cash flows represent managementSTOCKHOLDERS's EQUITY best estimate based on currently available information and reasonable and supportable assumptions. Any impairment recognized is permanent and may not be restored. At March 31, 2012, the Company has not recognized any impairment of long-lived assets.(DEFICIT)

~~Conversion~~FOR ~~Features~~THE ~~and~~YEARS ~~Warrants~~ENDED ~~Issued~~MARCH ~~with~~31, ~~Convertible~~2013 ~~Debt~~AND 2012

The Company's derivative financial instruments consist of embedded derivatives related to the senior convertible secured notes. These embedded derivatives include the conversion feature and the detachable warrants. As of the inception date of the agreement the debt was not considered conventional as defined in EITF 05-2, “The Meaning of "Conventional Convertible Debt Instruments" in issue No. 00-19”, codified into ASC 815. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the conversion feature and related warrants at their fair values and record them at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. Any change in fair value is to be recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each reporting date. If the fair value of the derivatives is higher at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company will record a non-operating, non-cash charge. If the fair value of the derivatives is lower at the subsequent balance sheet date, the Company will record non-operating, non-cash income.

	Common Stock						Additional Paid-in			Accumulated			Total Stockholders'
	Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			Equity (Defict)
Balances - March 31, 2011		14,629,962		$	14,630		$	3,659,159		$	(4,267,297	)	$	(593,508	)

Stock issued for cash		1,500,000			1,500			2,299,750			–			2,301,250
Cashless exercise of stock options		20,000			20			14,980			–			15,000
Repurchase of stock options		–			–			(8,000	)		–			(8,000	)
Repurchase of common stock		(3,333	)		(3	)		(3,827	)		–			(3,830	)
Common stock issued to related parties for consulting fees		266,666			266			199,734			–			200,000
Common stock issued for services		40,050			40			46,520			–			46,560
Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities		5,179			5			10,095			–			10,100
Amendment of WES Acquisition		–			–			(183,123	)		–			(183,123	)
Stock-based compensation		–			–			379,382			–			379,382
Net income		–			–			–			2,254,920			2,254,920

Balances - March 31, 2012		16,458,524			16,458			6,414,670			(2,012,377	)		4,418,751

Common stock issued to related parties for services		661,834			663			589,486			–			590,149
Stock-based compensation		–			–			254,918			–			254,918
Net loss		–			–			–			(1,275,127	)		(1,275,127	)

Balances - March 31, 2013		17,120,358		$	17,121		$	7,259,074		$	(3,287,504	)	$	3,988,691

~~EITF~~The ~~98-5,~~accompanying ~~“Accounting~~notes ~~for~~are Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios” and EITF 00-27, “Application of Issue 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments”, both codified into ASC 470 governs the calculation of an ~~embedded~~integral ~~beneficial~~part ~~conversion, which is treated as an additional discount to the to the instruments where derivative accounting (explained above) does not apply. The amount~~ of ~~the~~these consolidated ~~value~~financial ~~of warrants and beneficial conversion feature may reduce the carrying value of the instrument to zero, but no further~~statements. ~~The discounts relating to the initial recording of the derivatives or beneficial conversion features are accreted over the term of the debt.~~

~~Investment, at Cost~~F-4

~~The~~SUSTAINABLE ~~Company~~ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES accounted for their investment in World Environmental Solutions Pty (“WES”) using the cost method due to the limited ownership and influence on the entity. Under the cost method, the investment was recorded at cost at the time of purchase. The Company does not adjust this investment unless the investment is considered impaired or there are liquidating dividends, both of which reduce the investment account. The aggregate carrying amount of our cost-method investment at March 31, 2011 was $91,466, representing a 12% ownership in WES. During the year ended March 31, 2012, the Company removed the cost-method investment in WES based on the change in terms of the agreement as discussed in Note 1 of the financial statements.CORPORATION

~~Goodwill~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

~~Under~~FOR ~~the~~THE ~~current~~YEARS ~~accounting~~ENDED ~~standards,~~MARCH the Company requires that goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are subject to an annual impairment test which has two steps to determine whether an asset impairment exists. The first step of the impairment test identifies potential impairment by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit31, ~~including~~2013 ~~goodwill.~~AND If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Intangibles with indefinite useful lives are measured for impairment by the amount that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the intangible. The fair value is calculated using the income approach. Intangible assets with definite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Any impairment is recorded at the date of determination.2012

F-10

	For the Year Ended March 31,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(1,275,127	)	$	2,254,920
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of debt discounts related to beneficial conversion features and warrants		109,228			143,511
Gain on settlement of note payable and accrued interest		–			(624,909	)
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)		679,130			(1,234,090	)
Impairment of intangible assets		108,335			–
Loss on disposal of assets		27,820			28,256
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities		(119,846	)		(127,438	)
Depreciation and amortization		416,660			196,167
Stock-based compensation		845,067			640,942
Gain on settlement and extinguishment of accounts payable		(87,485	)		(140,625	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(128,741	)		66,912
Prepaid expenses		27,275			(43,141	)
Accounts payable		162,089			(175,204	)
Accrued liabilities		169,618			(149,688	)
Income taxes payable		(59,200	)		33,377
Net cash provided by operating activities		874,823			868,990

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(4,627,701	)		(965,803	)
Other assets		(25,000	)		–
Net cash used in investing activities		(4,652,701	)		(965,803	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of common stock		–			2,301,250
Proceeds from related party note payable		2,300,000			–
Repurchase of common stock		–			(3,830	)
Repurchase of stock options		–			(8,000	)
Payments on related party convertible note payable		(264,828	)		(227,226	)
Payments on notes payable		(107,254	)		(156,914	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,927,918			1,905,280

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(1,849,960	)		1,808,467
Cash - beginning of year		1,913,727			105,260
Cash - ending of year	$	63,767		$	1,913,727

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	61,602		$	98,485
Income taxes	$	52,141		$	30,438

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment in accounts payable	$	2,943,161		$	–
Issuance of common stock in settlement of accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	–		$	10,100
Issuance of convertible note, common stock, and warrants for cost investment and pending patents	$	–		$	140,000

The ~~Company’s~~accompanying ~~policy~~notes provides for annual evaluation of goodwill on the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events and changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment of goodwill is tested at the operating segment level by comparing the segments' net carrying value, including goodwill, to the fair value of the segment. The fair values of our segments are ~~estimated~~an ~~using~~integral apart ~~combination~~ of ~~the~~these consolidated ~~income~~financial ~~or discounted cash flows approach and the market approach, which uses comparable market data~~statements. If the carrying amount of the segment exceeds its fair value, goodwill is potentially impaired and a second test would be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. All goodwill is associated with the Pro Water segment. At March 31, 2012, the Company has determined that the fair value of the Pro Water segment is substantially in excess of the carrying value.

~~Derivative Financial Instruments~~F-5

~~Derivative~~SUSTAINABLE ~~financial~~ENVIRONMENTAL ~~instruments,~~TECHNOLOGIES as defined in ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.CORPORATION

~~The~~NOTES ~~Company~~TO ~~does~~CONSOLIDATED ~~not~~FINANCIAL use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company has issued financial instruments including senior convertible notes payable and freestanding stock purchase warrants with features that are either (i) not afforded equity classification, (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. As required by ASC 815, in certain instances, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in our financial statements.STATEMENTS

~~The~~Note ~~Company~~1 ~~estimates~~– the fair values of derivative financial instruments using various techniques (and combinations thereof) that are considered to be consistent with the objectively measuring fair values. In selecting the appropriate techniqueOrganization, ~~consideration~~History ~~is give to, among other factors, the nature of the instrument, the market risks that it embodies~~ and Significant ~~the~~Accounting ~~expected~~Policies means of settlement. For less complex derivative instruments, such as free-standing warrants, the Company generally uses the Black-Scholes option valuation technique because it embodies all of the requisite assumptions (including trading volatility, estimated terms and risk free rates) necessary to fair value these instruments. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock, which has a high-historical volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, the Company's operating results will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.Procedures

~~Revenue~~Organization ~~Recognition~~and History

~~For~~Sustainable ~~revenue~~Environmental ~~from~~Technologies ~~product sales,~~ Corporation (the “Company” ~~recognizes~~or ~~revenue~~“SETS” inor ~~accordance~~“SET ~~with~~Corp”) ~~ASC~~is ~~605, Revenue Recognition. The Company generates revenues from its deep injection water disposal well. Customers are charged on~~ a ~~per~~company ~~barrel~~dedicated ~~rate~~to ~~for~~responsible ~~the~~resource ~~water~~utilization through ~~in which~~ the ~~Company~~strategic ~~disposes.~~balance ~~Revenue~~of ~~is recorded when the water is disposed assuming all the revenue recognition criteria stated below are satisfied. In connection with the water disposal~~environmental, ~~the~~societal ~~Company~~and ~~reclaims~~economic ~~oil which is suspended within the water~~growth. ~~Periodically,~~SET ~~the~~Corp ~~Company sells this reclaimed oil to third parties and revenue~~ is ~~recognized~~setting ~~upon sale assuming all~~ the ~~revenue~~standard ~~recognition~~for ~~criteria~~responsible principles ~~stated below are satisfied. The Company records revenue when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence~~ of ansustainable ~~arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured~~development. ~~Determination~~These ofsteadfast ~~criteria~~values ~~(3) and (4)~~ are ~~based~~evident onthrough ~~management's~~patented ~~judgments~~technologies ~~regarding the fixed nature of the prices for the services performed~~ and ~~the~~strategic ~~collectability of those amounts. In addition~~acquisitions, ~~the Company extends credit to customers in~~ which ~~have~~solve ~~shown~~environmental ~~the~~issues ~~ability~~with toan ~~pay~~economic ~~for the services~~advantage. AtSET ~~times~~Corp ~~the~~limits ~~Company~~their ~~extends~~customer’s ~~credit~~environmental toimpact ~~new~~while conserving ~~customers;~~valuable ~~however, such is not done until the Company is satisfied through references, evidence of financial soundness, etc. Provisions for allowances are performed periodically~~ and ~~estimates~~diminishing ~~for~~resources ~~uncollectable~~that ~~amounts~~ are ~~recorded~~essential asto ~~necessary~~future ~~based on management’s estimates~~generations.

~~Cost~~Current and future services include, and are expected to include innovative eco-technologies that provide patented treatment, recovery, reclamation and re-injection services for produced water (associated with the oil and gas industry) and complete sustainable energy solutions that bridge the gap between existing energy inefficient buildings and the sustainable development and design needs of ~~Revenues~~tomorrow.

~~Costs~~In ofaddition ~~revenues~~to ~~include~~these ~~costs~~areas ~~related~~of toexpertise, ~~revenue~~SET Corp ~~recognized;~~provides ~~such~~customized ~~costs~~services ~~represent~~that ~~labor~~include design, ~~depreciation~~construction management, operation and ~~amortization~~maintenance services, and equipment manufacturing ~~rental,~~for ~~supplies~~industrial and municipal sectors. With strategic partnerships, ~~utilities~~through prominent global manufacturers and distributors, SET ~~repair~~Corp has access to a worldwide sales and ~~maintenance~~distribution network. Currently, our revenues are derived within the United States.

~~General~~Termination ~~and~~of ~~Administrative~~Project ~~Expenses~~Finance Transaction

~~General~~On ~~and~~September ~~administrative~~17, ~~expenses~~2012, ~~include~~through ~~management~~ProWater, LLC (“ProWater Colorado”), an entity owned by the Company, we entered into an asset purchase agreement, and ~~administrative~~amendment ~~personnel~~thereto on ~~costs;~~October ~~corporate~~23, ~~office~~2012 ~~costs;~~(collectively ~~accounting~~the ~~fees~~“APA”), ~~legal~~contingent ~~expense~~on shareholder approval, ~~information~~the ~~systems~~assumption ~~expense~~of certain debts by PWCO, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“PWCO”), and ~~product~~ProWater’s ~~marketing~~contribution of the assets of the Cartwright Well, the Williston Well, and ~~sales~~our ~~expense~~Centerline SWD Technology (the Cartwright Well, the Williston Well, and the Centerline SWD System shall collectively be referred to as the “Projects”) to PWCO in exchange for 35% ownership in PWCO.

~~Research~~By us entering into the APA as part of a series of transactions, collectively referred to as the “Project Finance Transaction”, the Company, along with the other members of PWCO, were leveraging PWCO’s $2,000,000 revolving line of credit, personally guaranteed by Robert Glaser and ~~Development~~Keith ~~Expenses~~Morlock, two officers and directors of the Company, including the anticipated project finance investment of $6,000,000 by Cancen Oil Processors, Inc., a corporation formed under the laws of Alberta, Canada (“Cancen Private Co.”) to complete the Projects. Therefore, we would have had the ability to finish the building and development of the Projects without diluting our shareholders, and at the same time having a substantial interest in PWCO. On December 21, 2012, at our annual meeting of the shareholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, the shareholders approved the APA, and the Project Finance Transaction.

~~Research~~However, on April 12, 2013, the holders of the membership interests of PWCO, which includes the Company, Cancen Private Co., Bridgewell Worldwide Limited (“Bridgewell”), Keith Morlock (“Morlock”) and ~~development~~Robert ~~expenses~~Glaser ~~consist~~(“Glaser”), agreed to rescind the APA, and make null and void any and all documentation associated with the Project Finance Transaction (such documentation shall be referred to herein as the “JV Documentation”). To return the parties to their original position after the rescission, the following steps have been taken, first, all of ~~expenses~~the ~~related~~assets and liabilities of ProWater Colorado that were transferred to ~~its~~PWCO ~~MultiGen~~pursuant ~~technology~~to the APA were returned in full to ProWater Colorado, ~~which~~second, PWCO is ~~still~~in the process of being wound up and dissolved and all membership interests of PWCO cancelled, and lastly, the Company assumed the $2,000,000 loan from Bridgewell, as an Amended and Restated Revolving Note Agreement. The material terms of the Amended and Restated Revolving Note Agreement included the following; a) the principal amount increased to $2,300,000, plus 5% interest; b) the personal guarantees of Morlock and Glaser terminated, and in ~~its~~exchange, ~~preliminary~~the ~~stages~~ProWater shall grant a first priority security interest to Bridgewell in the Cartwright Well ; and lastly c) upon the mutual consent of the ~~which~~Company ~~its~~and ~~future~~Bridgewell, ~~benefits~~any ~~are~~outstanding ~~uncertain~~principal and interest may be converted at any time, into common stock of the Company.

~~F-11~~On April 30, 2013, Bridgewell notified us that they wanted to convert the Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement into 18,153,846 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $0.13 per share, making the Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement paid in full, and of no further effect.

~~Earnings~~As ~~Per~~of ~~Common~~March ~~Share~~31, 2013, the $6.0 million in capital which was anticipated to be raised for the Project Finance Transaction from Cancen Private Co., or another qualified investor, had not yet been funded. Thus, the accounting method SET Corp expected after the funding of the Project Finance Transaction would have been accounted for under the equity method as SET Corp would have held a 35% ownership in PWCO and have significant influence over that entity. However, because such funding had not been raised, which was a significant factor in closing the transaction, the assets, liabilities, and the operating results of PWCO since inception have been consolidated into the financial statements as the transaction was never consummated and the majority of the liabilities and benefits remained with SETS.

~~Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted~~F-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the combination of dilutive common share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Company’s share-based compensation plans and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of in-the-money share equivalents, which are calculated, based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of an award, if any, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital, if any, when an award is settled are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period.6

~~The~~MultiGen following is a summary of outstanding securities which have been included in the calculation of diluted net income per share and reconciliation of net income to net income available to common stock holders for the year ended March 31, 2012:Acquisition

	For the Year Ended March 31, 2012
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in calculating basic earnings per share		15,028,294
Effect of convertible notes payable		1,482,746
Effect of options and warrants		802,212
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share		17,313,252
Net income as reported	$	2,254,920
Add - Interest on convertible notes payable		225,540
Net income available to common stockholders	$	2,480,460

On August 27, 2010, we entered into a “Technology Purchase Agreement” with World Environmental Solutions Pty Ltd, an Australian company (“WES”). In exchange for an investment in WES, we purchased certain technologies, including all intellectual property rights and pending patents of WES. Such patents and patent applications include patent application number 20088237617 and patent application number 2010228129. Both patent applications relate to the water extraction and electricity generation units as referred to as MultiGen.

~~The~~Effective ~~Company~~September ~~excluded~~1, 22011,~~005,502~~ ~~warrants~~we ~~from~~entered into an amendment with WES to the ~~computation~~aforementioned ~~for~~Technology Purchase Agreement (“Amendment to the ~~year~~TPA”). Pursuant to ~~ended~~the ~~March~~terms 31of the Amendment to the TPA: (i) SET Corp’s option to purchase 3% of the capital stock of WES has been canceled; (ii) WES’ warrant to purchase 333,333 ~~2012~~shares of SET Corp’s common stock at a price of $5.25 per share has been canceled; (iii) WES’ $200,000 asconvertible ~~their~~secured ~~exercise~~promissory ~~prices~~note ~~were~~issued inby ~~excess~~SET Corp. (convertible at $5.25 per share of SET Corp’s common stock), and all security interests granted there under, has been canceled; (iv) SET Corp’s ownership of 12% of the capital ~~average~~stock ~~closing~~of ~~market~~WES ~~price~~has been canceled; (v) SET Corp’s payment to WES upon certain terms of WES’ successful installation and sale of a MultiGen unit has been reduced to 250,000 shares of SET Corp’s common stock; (vi) the ~~Company~~maximum share issuance by SET Corp to WES based on WES royalties paid to SET Corp for certain WES sales of MultiGen units has been reduced to 333,333 shares of SET Corp’s common stock; (vii) any shares of SET Corp common stock issued to WES pursuant to the Agreement, ~~causing~~as amended, shall be restricted from transfer for one year from the date of issuance; (viii) SET Corp maximum royalty obligation to WES for SET Corp sales of MultiGen units has been reduced to $500,000; (ix) WES shall pay SET Corp a royalty of 10% of gross revenues for WES sales of MultiGen units; (x) WES and SET Corp shall split 75/25 certain fees paid to WES in connection with agency for sales of MultiGen units outside of Australia; and (xi) the parties have covenanted to use their ~~effects~~best efforts in regards to bemaintaining distributor ~~anti-dilutive~~status ~~using~~for sourcing components for the ~~treasury~~MultiGen units; WES retained 133,333 shares of common stock ~~method~~issued in connection with the original agreement. See Notes 2 and 3 for additional information.

~~The~~Due ~~following~~to isthe significant change in the terms of the Technology Purchase Agreement, the Company determined that the Amendment to the TPA represented the establishment of a ~~summary~~new agreement. Thus, the Company revalued the 133,333 shares of ~~outstanding~~common ~~securities~~stock ~~which~~issued ~~have~~to ~~been~~WES ~~excluded~~on ~~from~~the date of the ~~calculation~~Amendment to the TPA resulting in a value of ~~diluted~~$140,000 being applied to the pending patents. The Company determined that the fair market value of the common stock issued was more representative of fair value than the pending patents received. The net ~~loss~~difference ~~per~~between ~~share~~removing the ~~because~~fair value of the ~~effect~~items ~~would~~issued ~~have~~under ~~been~~the ~~anti-dilutive~~old ~~for~~Technology Purchase Agreement and the Amendment to the TPA were classified as additional paid in capital, thus, no gain or loss was recorded on the transaction. During the year ended March 31, ~~2011:~~2013, the Company recorded $108,335 of impairment fully impairing the carrying value of the intangible assets, which is reflected in the statements of operations due to future expected cash flows not exceeding the carrying value of the assets. The Company did not believe such technology to be viable and therefore concluded on impairing the assets. As of March 31, 2013, none of the contingent consideration under the WES Agreement had been triggered.

	For the Year Ended March 31, 2011
Common stock options		163,333
Common stock warrants		-
Convertible notes		1,570,335
		1,733,668

Management’s Plans

~~Advertising~~As ~~Costs~~shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, during the year ended March 31, 2013, we incurred an operating loss before income taxes of $603,056. As of March 31, 2013, we had a working capital deficit of $3,156,652. In addition, operations are primarily concentrated with two customers, one which represented 78% and one which represented 10% of total revenues. During the year ended March 31, 2013, we generated positive cash flows from operations of $874,823. The net loss during the year ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to a 20% decrease in revenue due to a 3% decrease in sales with our majority water processing customer and 20% increase in operating expenses mostly due to salaries, severance agreements, and stock-based compensation. During the year ended March 31, 2013, we funded operations through cash flows generated from the Pro Water segment. In fiscal 2014, we intend to fund operations and pay down liabilities through cash on hand and the positive cash flow being generated by the Pro Water segment. In addition, we intend to continue to negotiate the settlement of liabilities. The Company has subsequently converted over $3,600,000 of debt into stock and its majority shareholder has committed to $2,600,000 in a stock purchase agreement of which all has been received and used to decrease Pro Water Colorado payables from approximately $3,000,000 to $1,100,000. In addition, the Company has recorded a gain on settlement of accounts payable of approximately $140,000 due to negotiations. The gains are expected to be recorded as a decrease in capital expenditures as all payables were incurred in connection with the construction of the North Dakota plants.

~~The~~If ~~Company~~current ~~expenses~~and ~~all~~projected revenue growth does not meet Management estimates, the Management may choose to raise additional capital through debt and/or equity transactions, reduce certain overhead costs through the deferral of ~~advertising~~salaries asand ~~incurred~~other means, and settle liabilities through negotiation. Currently, we ~~The~~cannot ~~Company~~provide ~~expensed~~assurance $5that such financing will be available to us on favorable terms,~~052~~ or at all. If, after utilizing the existing sources of capital available to us, further capital needs are identified and $2if we are not successful in obtaining the financing,~~667~~ we may be forced to curtail our existing or planned future operations. We believe our plans will enable us to continue for a period in excess of ~~advertising~~one ~~costs~~year ~~during~~from the ~~years~~date ~~ended~~of ~~March~~the 31most recent balance sheet. The Company currently has $353,381 ~~2012~~in cash on hand and ~~2011,~~with ~~respectively~~revenue generated from the Pro Water segment is expected to fund operations for a period of at least one year.

~~Stock~~F-~~Based Compensation~~7

~~ASC~~Note ~~718,~~2 ~~Share-Based~~– ~~Payment~~Accounting ~~requires~~Policies ~~that~~and ~~compensation cost related to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. Share-based payment transactions within the scope~~ Basis of ~~ASC 718 include stock options, restricted stock plans, performance-based awards, stock appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.~~Presentation

~~The~~Principles ~~Company adopted ASC 718, which requires disclosure~~ of the fair value and other characteristics of stock options and more prominent disclosure about the effects of an entity’s accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based compensation on reported net loss. The Company has reflected the expense of such stock based compensation based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of ASC 718.Consolidation

FThe consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and operating results of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Pro Water, LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Pro Water Utah"), ProWater, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("Pro Water Colorado"), and SET IP Holdings LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Set IP"), after elimination of all material inter-company accounts and transactions. OC Energy and balances related to the Company’s former wastewater treatment plant are classified as discontinued operations. Also consolidated into the financial statements are the assets, liabilities, and operating results of PWCO because as of the date of this filing the Project Finance Transaction had not been funded by Cancen Oil Processors, Inc., or another qualified investor(s). As of April 12, 2013, the APA was rescinded and PWCO was dissolved, and the parties were returned to their original position after the rescission because such funding had not been raised, the assets, liabilities, and the operating results of PWCO since inception have been consolidated into the financial statements as the transaction was never consummated and the majority of the liabilities and benefits remained with SETS.

In connection with the adoption of ASC 718, the fair value of our share-based compensation has been determined utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair value of the options granted is amortized as compensation expense on a straight line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting period. The fair value calculations involve significant judgments, assumptions, estimates and complexities that impact the amount of compensation expense to be recorded in current and future periods. Upon option exercise, the Company issues new shares of stock.Estimates

The ~~following~~preparation ~~weighted~~of ~~average~~financial ~~variables~~statements ~~were~~in conformity ~~used~~with inUnited States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the ~~Black~~reported ~~Scholes~~amounts ~~model~~of ~~for~~assets ~~all~~and ~~option~~liabilities ~~issuances~~and ~~valued~~disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the ~~fiscal~~reporting ~~year~~period. ~~ended~~Significant ~~March~~estimates 31include the valuation of derivatives, ~~2012~~equity instruments such as options and ~~2011~~warrants, provision for income taxes and the realization of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Year ended March 31,	Stock Price at Grant Date		Dividend Yield	Exercise Price		Risk Free Interest Rate	Volatility	Average Life
2012	$	1.02	-%	$	1.02	0.83%	264%	5.50
2011	$	0.45	-%	$	0.45	0.39%	257%	4.11

Comparative Financial Information

~~The~~Certain ~~Company's~~prior ~~accounting~~year ~~policy~~amounts ~~for~~have ~~equity~~been reclassified ~~instruments issued~~ to ~~consultants~~conform ~~and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued~~ to ~~Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”, codified into ASC 505. The measurement date for~~ the ~~fair~~current ~~value~~year of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor's performance is completepresentation. ~~In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.~~

~~Segment~~Fair ~~Reporting~~Value of Financial Instruments

~~The~~Fair ~~Company~~value ~~reports~~is ~~its~~defined ~~segments~~as ~~under~~the ~~ASC~~exchange ~~280,~~price that ~~Segment~~would ~~Reporting,~~be ~~which~~received ~~establishes~~for ~~standards~~an ~~for~~asset ~~reporting~~or ~~information~~paid ~~regarding~~to ~~operating~~transfer ~~segments~~a inliability ~~annual~~(an ~~financial~~exit ~~statements~~price) ~~and~~in ~~requires~~the ~~selected~~principal ~~information~~or ~~for~~most ~~those~~advantageous ~~segments~~market for tothe beasset ~~presented~~or liability in ~~interim~~an ~~financial~~orderly ~~reports~~transaction ~~issued~~between tomarket ~~stockholders~~participants as of the measurement date. ~~ASC~~Applicable ~~280~~accounting guidance ~~also~~provides ~~establishes~~an ~~standards~~established hierarchy for ~~related~~inputs ~~disclosures~~used ~~about~~in ~~products~~measuring ~~and~~fair ~~services~~value ~~and~~that ~~geographic~~maximizes ~~areas.~~the ~~Operating~~use ~~segments~~of ~~are~~observable ~~identified~~inputs and asminimizes ~~components~~the use of anunobservable ~~enterprise~~inputs ~~about~~by ~~which~~requiring ~~separate~~that ~~discrete~~the ~~financial~~most ~~information~~observable isinputs be used when available. ~~for~~Observable ~~evaluation~~inputs are byinputs ~~the~~that ~~chief~~market ~~operating~~participants ~~decision~~would ~~maker,~~use orin ~~decision~~valuing ~~making~~the ~~group,~~asset inor ~~making~~liability ~~decisions~~and onare ~~how~~developed tobased ~~allocate~~on ~~resources~~market ~~and~~data ~~assess~~obtained from ~~performance.~~sources Asindependent of ~~March~~the ~~31,~~Company. ~~2012~~Unobservable ~~and~~inputs ~~2011,~~are inputs that reflect the Company’s ~~has~~assumptions ~~two~~about ~~segments:~~the factors ~~PWU~~that ~~and~~market ~~SET~~participants ~~Corp,~~would ~~with~~use ~~PWU~~in ~~being~~valuing the ~~only~~asset ~~revenue~~or ~~producing segment~~liability. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

~~Income~~Level ~~Taxes~~1 - Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

~~The~~Level ~~Company~~2 ~~follows~~- ~~ASC~~Include ~~740,~~other ~~Income~~inputs ~~Taxes~~that ~~for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities~~ are ~~computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset~~ directly or ~~liability~~indirectly isobservable ~~expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes~~ in the ~~asset or liability each period~~marketplace. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.

~~Deferred~~Level ~~income~~3 taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-~~current,~~ ~~depending~~Unobservable oninputs ~~the classification of assets and liabilities to~~ which ~~they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that~~ are ~~not~~supported by ~~related~~little ~~to an asset~~ or ~~liability~~no ~~are~~market ~~classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse~~activity. The method to estimate the deferred tax asset is based on the feasibility of recoverability of the asset. The valuation allowance applied to the deferred tax asset is based on the relatively short operating history of the Company primarily based on one significant customer concentration.

~~Note~~The 3fair –value ~~Intangible~~hierarchy ~~Assets~~also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Derivative instruments include the warrant liability (Level 2). Derivative instruments are valued using standard calculations/models that are primarily based on observable inputs, including volatilities and interest rates. Therefore, derivative instruments are included in Level 2.

~~Customer~~Fair-value ~~Relationships~~estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2013 and 2012. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, prepaids, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, notes payable, and convertible notes payable. Fair values for these items were assumed to approximate carrying values because of their short term in nature or they are payable on demand.

The ~~customer~~following ~~relationships~~table ~~are~~presents ~~being amortized over~~ the ~~period~~Company’s fair ofvalue ~~seven~~hierarchy ~~years from the acquisition date of October 1, 2009. The goodwill is not subject to amortization and will not be deductible~~ for ~~income~~assets ~~tax purposes. During the years ended March 31, 2012~~ and ~~2011,~~liabilities ~~the~~measured ~~Company~~at ~~recorded~~fair ~~amortization expense to cost of goods sold related to the customer relationship of $28,936 and $28,556, respectively. The net carrying~~ value ofon ~~the~~a ~~customer~~recurring ~~relationship~~basis asat of March 31, ~~2012 was $130,108. Future amortization expense of the customer relationship is expected to be as follows for the years ending March 31: $28,857, $28,857, $28,857 $28,857, and $14,680 in~~ 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Goodwill represents expected synergies from the merger of operations. These synergies include a full management team and a formalized corporate organizational structure to expand the operations. In addition, there were limited intangible assets in which did not qualify for separate recognition, such as an established workforce, but the effects on the consolidated financial statements are immaterial.:

F-13

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	63,767	$	–	$	–	$	63,767
Total assets measured at fair value	$	63,767	$	–	$	–	$	63,767

Liabilities
Derivative instruments	$	–	$	–	$	–	$	–
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	–	$	–	$	–	$	–

~~Pending Patents~~F-8

InThe ~~connection~~following ~~with~~table ~~the~~presents ~~pending patents acquired from WES,~~ the Company’s fair ~~is amortizing the~~ value ofhierarchy ~~the~~for ~~patents~~assets ~~over~~measured anat ~~estimated~~fair life of 15 years, which is the approximate remaining life and projected cash flows of the pending patents. During the year ended March 31, 2012, the Company amortized $12,166, which is included in general and administrative expense. At March 31, 2012, the net carrying value ofon ~~the pending patents was $118,335. See Note 1 for~~ a ~~description~~recurring ~~related~~basis toat ~~a change in the agreement with WES. As of~~ March 31, 2012, none of the contingent consideration under the WES Agreement had been triggered. As of March 31, 2012, the patent life was approximately 14 years of which $8,452 is expected to be amortized annually until fully amortized.:

Note 4 – Property and Equipment

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,913,727	$	–	$	–	$	1,913,727
Total assets measured at fair value	$	1,913,727	$	–	$	–	$	1,913,727

Liabilities
Derivative instruments	$	–	$	119,846	$	–	$	119,846
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	–	$	119,846	$	–	$	119,846

~~Property~~The Company measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets include cost method investments when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition or in a nonmonetary exchange, and property and equipment and intangible assets that are aswritten ~~follows:~~down to fair value when they are held for sale or determined to be impaired. During the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have any significant assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition.

	March 31, 2012			March 31, 2011
Injection well	$	613,976		$	613,976
Machinery and equipment		1,695,072			1,393,046
Buildings		7,500			7,500
Land		51,000			51,000
Furniture and fixtures		36,465			28,464
Accumulated depreciation		(250,639	)		(104,094	)
Total	$	2,153,374		$	1,989,892

Concentrations

~~During~~Credit ~~the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $155,064 and $87,646, respectively.~~Risk

~~Asset~~At ~~Retirement~~times, ~~Obligations~~the Company maintains cash balances at a financial institution in excess of the $250,000 FDIC insurance limit. In addition, at times the Company extends credit to customers in the normal course of business, after an evaluation of the credit worthiness. The Company does not expect to take any unnecessary credit risks causing significant causing write-offs of potentially uncollectible accounts. The Company also maintains reserves for potential credit losses. The Company considers the following factors when determining if collection of a fee is reasonably assured: customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends and changes in customer payment terms.

~~At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded an asset retirement obligation of approximately $9,900 related to the DIW.~~Customer

~~Note~~The 5geographic –location ~~Discontinued~~of ~~Operations~~the injection well is a direct factor with relation to the radius of customer’s injection wells that can be economically serviced. While there are several key factors to obtaining new business, the ratio of available business per customer is based solely on the number of wells the customer has within the serviceable radius of the injection well. As new gas wells are developed within the serviceable radius of the well, the ratio of customers to percentage of business will decrease. Until new wells are developed the expected customer to business ratio are not expected to change. During year ended March 31, 2013, the Company had two (2) customers that accounted for approximately 78% and 10% of its revenue and two (2) customers that accounted for 41% and 52% of its accounts receivable at March 31, 2013. During the year ended March 31, 2012, the Company had one (1) customer that accounted for approximately 81% of its revenue and 84% of its accounts receivable at March 31, 2012. The loss of our injection well customers would have a significant impact on the Company’s financial results. In addition, we are selling our reclaimed oil to two customers. If there was an issue with these customers, we have additional oil customers that would potentially take this position.

~~The~~Cash ~~financial results of the Company discontinued operations which consist of OC Energy and the former wastewater plant for the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:~~Equivalents

	For the Year Ended March 31, 2012		For the Year Ended March 31, 2011
Product sales	$	-	$	-
Water treatment royalties		-		-
Income taxes		-		-
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes	$	14,161	$	74,701

All highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three (3) months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

~~The~~Restricted ~~following are the combined condensed balance sheets of OC Energy and the former wastewater treatment plant:~~Assets

	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-	$	410
Total current assets	$	-	$	410
Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	-	$	20,116
Accrued liabilities		-		99,307
Total current liabilities	$	-	$	119,423

As of March 31, 2013, the Company has $70,000 in reclamation bonds and $25,000 in sales tax bonds with the State of North Dakota. The assets are restricted and classified as long-term other assets for the duration of doing business in the State of North Dakota.

~~Management~~Property ~~believes~~and ~~there are no contingent liabilities related to discontinued operations.~~Equipment

FProperty and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-14line method for financial statement purposes. The estimated lives of property and equipment are as follows:

Note 6 – Certain Balance Sheet Elements

Injection well	20 years
Machinery and equipment, furniture and equipment	Five to ten years
Buildings	25 years
Land	not depreciated

~~Accrued~~Capitalized ~~Liabilities~~Interest

~~The~~Beginning ~~Company’s~~in ~~accrued~~November ~~liabilities~~2012 ~~are~~interest asrelated to ~~follows:~~the Bridgewell Revolving Loan Agreement to build the Cartwright Well has been capitalized to the Injection Well within property and equipment. Capitalized interest is added to the cost of the underlying asset. During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company capitalized interest of $50,000.

	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011
Accrued interest	$	39,271	$	192,162
Royalty payable		61,995		51,798
Other		76,820		93,945
Total	$	178,086	$	337,905

F-9

~~Note~~Impairment 7of –Long-Lived ~~Notes~~and ~~Payable~~Purchased Intangible Assets

~~Note~~The ~~Payable~~Company has adopted ASC 350 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other. The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to ~~Vendor~~recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undercounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 350 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

OnLong-lived ~~the~~assets, ~~Effective~~such ~~Date,~~as ~~the~~property ~~Company assumed~~and aequipment and ~~promissory~~purchased ~~note~~intangibles subject to aamortization, ~~vendor~~are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in ~~settlement~~circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of ~~$410,500~~an asset may not be recoverable. ~~The~~Recoverability ~~vendor~~of ~~manufactured~~the ~~and~~asset ~~installed~~is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to undiscounted future net cash flows the ~~Company’s~~asset ~~discontinued~~is ~~water~~expected ~~treatment~~to ~~facility~~generate. ~~The~~ ~~note~~If ~~bore~~such ~~interest~~assets atare ~~10%~~considered ~~per~~to ~~annum~~be ~~with~~impaired, athe impairment ~~one-time~~to ~~default~~be ~~penalty~~recognized ofis ~~10%~~measured ofas the ~~principal~~amount ~~balance,~~by ~~and~~which ~~was~~the ~~secured~~carrying byamount of the ~~Company’~~asset exceeds its fair market value. Estimates of expected future cash flows represent management's ~~Interceptor~~best ~~Plant~~estimate ~~contract~~based on currently available information and ~~the~~reasonable and ~~equipment~~supportable ~~that~~assumptions. ~~was~~Any ~~manufactured~~impairment byrecognized ~~the~~is ~~vendor~~permanent and may not be restored. During the year ended March 31, ~~2012~~2013, the ~~due~~Company, to the ~~passage~~Company recorded $108,335 of impairment fully impairing the ~~statute~~carrying value of ~~limitations~~certain intangible assets, which is reflected in the ~~Company~~statements ~~wrote~~of ~~off~~operations due to ~~other~~future ~~income~~expected ~~the~~cash ~~$410,500~~flows ~~note~~not ~~and~~exceeding ~~accrued~~the ~~interest~~carrying ~~and~~value ~~penalties~~ of ~~$214,409~~the assets. The Company ~~received~~did anot ~~legal~~believe ~~opinion~~such ~~supporting~~technology ~~such~~to inbe ~~connection~~viable ~~with~~and therefore concluded on impairing the ~~former~~assets. ~~liability~~See Note 3.

~~MOU Note Payable~~Goodwill

OnUnder the ~~Effective~~current ~~Date~~accounting standards, the Company ~~assumed~~ arequires ~~promissory~~that ~~note~~goodwill ofand ~~$45,000~~intangible inassets ~~connection~~deemed ~~with~~to ahave ~~memorandum~~indefinite oflives ~~understanding~~are no longer amortized but are subject to an ~~purchase~~annual ~~SET~~impairment ~~Corp’s~~test ~~discontinued~~which ~~water~~has ~~treatment~~two ~~plant~~steps to determine whether an asset impairment exists. The ~~note~~first ~~bears~~step ~~interest~~of atthe ~~10%~~impairment test identifies potential impairment by comparing the fair value with athe ~~default~~carrying ~~rate~~amount of ~~18%~~the reporting unit, including goodwill. As If the carrying amount of ~~March~~the 31reporting unit exceeds its fair value, ~~2012~~the second step of the impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Intangibles with indefinite useful lives are measured for impairment by the amount ~~note~~that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the intangible. The fair value is calculated using the income approach. Intangible assets with definite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. Any impairment is recorded at the date of determination. ASU No. 2011-08 introduces an optional qualitative impairment effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in ~~default~~fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The update to ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and ~~interest~~Other isintroduced ~~being~~the ~~accrued~~option atto perform a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit before performing step one of the ~~default~~impairment ~~rate~~test. The qualitative assessment requires management to perform the assessment using a “more likely than not” concept whether the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value.

~~Convertible~~The ~~Notes~~Company’s ~~Payable~~policy provides for annual evaluation of goodwill on the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events and changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment of goodwill is tested at the operating segment level by comparing the segments' net carrying value, including goodwill, to ~~Horst~~the ~~Geicke~~fair value of the segment. The fair values of our segments are estimated using a combination of the income or discounted cash flows approach and ~~Related~~the ~~Entities~~market approach, which uses comparable market data. If the carrying amount of the segment exceeds its fair value, goodwill is potentially impaired and a second test would be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. All goodwill is associated with the Pro Water segment. At March 31, 2013, the Company has determined that the fair value of the Pro Water segment is substantially in excess of the carrying value due to projected cash flows.

OnDerivative ~~the~~Financial Effective Date, the Company assumed various convertible note agreements with an accredited investor and shareholder for proceeds totaling $775,000 and accrued interest of $50,000. In addition at the Effective Date, a discount on the convertible debt remained of $381,459. On July 7, 2010, the holder converted the note and accrued interest into 2,066,667 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon conversion the Company, recorded the remaining discount to interest expense. In addition, all accrued interest of $50,000, was forgiven, and treated as a capital contribution due to the related party nature of the transaction as such recorded to additional paid in capital.Instruments

~~Convertible~~Derivative ~~Note~~financial ~~Payable~~instruments, toas ~~WES~~defined in ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.

OnThe ~~August 27, 2010, in connection with the Agreement, the~~ Company ~~issued~~does anot ~~convertible~~use ~~promissory~~derivative ~~note~~financial instruments to ~~WES~~hedge inexposures ~~the~~to ~~amount of $200~~cash-flow,~~000,~~ ~~without~~market ~~interest~~ or ~~maturity,~~foreign-currency ~~convertible into Company common stock at a rate of $5~~risks.25 ~~per~~However, ~~share. The convertible note payable is payable at~~ the Company’s ~~discretion.~~has ~~The~~issued ~~note~~financial isinstruments including ~~secured~~senior byconvertible ~~the~~notes ~~Technology.~~payable Onand ~~the~~freestanding ~~date~~stock ofpurchase ~~issuance,~~warrants nowith ~~beneficial~~features ~~conversion feature was present. The Company determined~~ that ~~they~~are ~~would~~either ~~pay~~(i) ~~the~~not ~~note~~afforded equity ~~in approximately 15 years. Thus~~classification, ~~the~~(ii) ~~Company~~embody ~~recorded~~risks anot ~~discount~~clearly ofand ~~11%~~closely inrelated ~~the~~to ~~amount~~host ~~of $157~~contracts,~~159~~ ~~against~~or ~~the~~(iii) ~~notes.~~may ~~The discount will~~ be ~~amortized~~net-cash tosettled ~~interest expense over~~ by the ~~period of estimated maturity using the effective interest method~~counterparty. ~~During~~As ~~the~~required ~~years~~by ~~ended~~ASC ~~March 31~~815, ~~2012~~in ~~and~~certain ~~2011~~instances, ~~the~~these ~~Company~~instruments ~~recorded~~are ~~interest~~required ~~expense~~to ofbe ~~$4,365~~carried ~~and~~as ~~$6,112,~~derivative ~~respectively~~liabilities, at ~~and~~fair ~~extinguished the related unamortized discount of $146~~value,~~683~~ ~~to additional paid-~~in ~~capital~~our ~~during~~financial ~~the year ended March 31, 2012~~statements. ~~See Note 1 for information regarding the Transaction with WES.~~

~~Equipment~~The ~~Loan~~Company estimates the fair values of derivative financial instruments using various techniques (and combinations thereof) that are considered to be consistent with objectively measuring fair values. In selecting the appropriate technique, consideration is given to, among other factors, the nature of the instrument, the market risks that it embodies and the expected means of settlement. For less complex derivative instruments, such as free-standing warrants, the Company generally uses the Black-Scholes option valuation technique because it embodies all of the requisite assumptions (including trading volatility, estimated terms and risk free rates) necessary to fair value these instruments. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock, which has a high-historical volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, the Company's operating results will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.

In June 2010, the Company entered into a note payable agreement with an equipment provider for a machine in the amount of $38,745. The note bears interest at 7.25% per annum and is payable in 24 equal installments of $1,739, with the first installment due in July 2010. As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, the amount due on this loan was $5,275 and $24,868, respectively.F-10

~~F-15~~Revenue Recognition

~~Convertible~~For ~~Note~~revenue ~~Payable~~from product sales, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. The Company generates revenues from its deep injection water disposal wells. Customers are charged on a per barrel rate for the water in which the Company disposes. Revenue is recorded when the water is disposed assuming all the revenue recognition criteria stated below are satisfied. In connection with the water disposal, the Company reclaims oil which is suspended within the water. Periodically, the Company sells this reclaimed oil to ~~Metropolitan~~third ~~Real~~parties and ~~Estate~~revenue ~~LLC~~is recognized upon sale assuming all the revenue recognition criteria stated below are satisfied, which is typically on delivery to the third party. The Company records revenue when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed nature of the prices for the services performed and the collectability of those amounts. In addition, the Company extends credit to customers in which have shown the ability to pay for the services. At times the Company extends credit to new customers; however, such is not done until the Company is satisfied through references, evidence of financial soundness, etc. Provisions for allowances are performed periodically and estimates for uncollectable amounts are recorded as necessary based on management’s estimates.

AsCost ~~discussed in Note 1, on July 7, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire PWU . In connection with the acquisition, the member~~ of PWU received a $2.0 million secured convertible promissory note payable over the period of one year from the closing date, incurring interest at 5% annually and a conversion feature at the option of the holder into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.50 per share. The note is secured by all the assets of Pro Water. No beneficial conversion feature was recorded in connection with the note as the conversion price represented the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the agreement. In addition, the Company recorded the $2,000,000 convertible note as a reduction to additional paid-in capital as it was deemed to be a return of capital initially contributed to Pro Water by the member.Revenues

OnCosts ~~July 12, 2010, the terms~~ of ~~the~~revenues ~~acquisition~~include ~~were~~costs ~~amended whereby the conversion rate of the $2,000,000~~ related ~~secured~~to revenue ~~convertible~~recognized; ~~promissory note, which previously all converted at $1.50 at the option of the holder,~~ such ~~amended~~costs torepresent ~~so that $1~~labor,~~600,000~~ ofdepreciation ~~the note may be converted at $3.00 per share~~ and ~~$400~~amortization,~~000~~ ~~may~~equipment ~~be converted at $0.375 per share. The convertible note was due based on the following: $100~~rental,~~000~~ ~~paid on or before September 30~~supplies, ~~2010~~utilities, ~~$200,000~~repair ~~paid on or before December 31, 2010, $200,000 paid on or before March 31, 2011~~ and ~~the remaining amount of $1~~ maintenance,~~500,000~~ with unpaid interest on or before June 30, 2011. The $100,000 payment due in September 2010 was paid in October 2010. On July 12, 2010, since the conversion price of $0.375 related to $400,000 was significantly less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock per the closing market price, a beneficial conversion feature was present. The Company valued the beneficial conversion feature as of the date of the amended agreement in the amount of $696,000, and ~~recorded the maximum discount allowed of $400,000 against the note~~royalties. ~~The discount was being amortized over the term of the note using the straight line method due to the relatively short maturity of the note.~~

OnGeneral January 14, 2011, the terms of the convertible note were amended. As of the date of the amendment, the unpaid principal amount was $1,880,000. Under the terms of the new agreement, the term of the note was extended to five years and ~~all~~Administrative accrued interest was forgiven. The Company is to make 60 monthly payments of $35,478 commencing January 2011 and concluding December 2015, which has been extended until April 2016 discussed below. All other terms, including conversion and interest rates remained the same. Under ASC 470, Debt, the Company accounted for the change in terms of the debt as an extinguishment of the debt due to the significant change in the repayment period which impacted the expected cash flows in excess of 10%. Thus, the unamortized discount of $183,333 was removed and a new discount, with a beneficial conversion feature of $400,000 was recorded. Due to Geicke being a significant shareholder, no gain or loss was recorded and the result of the extinguishment was recorded to additional paid in capital. At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the $243,310 and $382,455 unamortized discount on the note was allocated between short and long term based on the expected annual amortization of which $109,318 and $139,196 has been allocated to short-term portion with the remaining $133,992 and $394,308 allocated to long-term portion. During the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company amortized $139,146 and $17,454 of the discount to interest expense, respectively, using the effective interest method. The note holder requested the principal payments for November and December 2011 and January and February 2012 be deferred. Therefore, payments are added on to the end of the term. The following is the expected amortization for the remaining discount under the effective interest rate method for the years ending March 31: $109,318, $77,964, $45,005, and $11,023 in 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively.Expenses

~~Note~~General ~~Payable~~and toadministrative ~~Vendor~~expenses ~~for~~include management ~~Settlement~~and ofadministrative ~~Accrued~~personnel ~~Liability~~costs; corporate office costs; accounting fees, legal expense, information systems expense, and product marketing and sales expense.

~~See~~Research ~~Note~~and 11Development ~~for note payable to vendor for settlement of accrued liability.~~Expenses

~~Note~~Research ~~Payout~~and ~~Schedule~~development expenses consisted of expenses related to its MultiGen technology, which is still in its preliminary stages and of which its future benefits are uncertain.

~~Future~~Earnings ~~principal payments~~Per ~~under~~Common ~~related party notes payable are expected to be as follows for the years ending March 31: $355,330, $373,509, $392,619, $412,706, and $35,330 in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively.~~Share

FBasic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-16average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the combination of dilutive common share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Company’s share-based compensation plans and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of in-the-money share equivalents, which are calculated, based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of an award, if any, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in paid-in capital, if any, when an award is settled are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the current period.

~~Note~~The 8following –is ~~Income~~a ~~taxes~~summary of outstanding securities which have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive for the year ended March 31, 2013:

The following table presents the current and deferred income tax provision for federal and state income taxes for the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

	For the Year Ended March 31, 2013
Common stock options		294,930
Common stock warrants		–
Effect of convertible note payable		1,368,222
		1,663,152

	Year Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Current tax provision:
Federal	$	35,800		$	-
State		28,015			800
Total		63,815			800
Deferred tax provision (benefit)
Federal		(2,270,083	)		(575,438	)
State		(279,113	)		(89,077	)
Valuation allowance		1,315,106			664,515
Total		(1,234,090	)		-
Total provision for income taxes	$	(1,170,275	)	$	800

The Company excluded 938,668 warrants from the computation for the year ended March 31, 2013, as their exercise prices were in excess of the average closing market price of the Company’s common stock, causing their effects to be anti-dilutive using the treasury stock method.

~~Current taxes in fiscal 2011 only consist of minimum taxes to the State of California which are insignificant and have not been presented.~~F-11

~~Reconciliations~~The following is a summary of outstanding securities which have been included in the ~~U.S.~~calculation ~~federal~~of ~~statutory~~diluted ~~rate~~net income per share and reconciliation of net income to ~~the~~net ~~actual~~income ~~tax~~available to ~~rate~~common stock holders for the ~~years~~year ended March 31, 2012 ~~and 2011are as follows~~:

	Year Ended March 31,
	For the Year Ended March 31, 2012
	2012			2011
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in calculating basic earnings per share		15,028,294
US federal statutory income tax rate		34.0%			34.0%
Effect of convertible notes payable		1,482,746
State tax – net of benefit		3.3 %			3.3 %
Effect of options and warrants		802,212
		37.3 %			37.3 %
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share		17,313,252
Permanent differences		10.5 %			234.3 %
Net income as reported	$	2,254,920
Changes of deferred tax assets		6.0 %			(459.0 %	)
Add - Interest on convertible notes payable		225,540
Increase and utilization of net operating losses		(40.5%	)		-%
Net income available to common stockholders	$	2,480,460
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance		(121.2%	)		187.4 %
Effective tax rate		(107.9%	)		0.0 %

The ~~components~~Company ofexcluded 2,005,502 warrants from the ~~Company’s~~computation ~~deferred~~for ~~tax~~the ~~assets~~year ~~and~~ended ~~(liabilities)~~March ~~for~~31, ~~federal~~2012, ~~and~~as ~~state~~their ~~income~~exercise ~~taxes~~prices aswere in excess of ~~March~~the 31average closing market price of the Company’s common stock, ~~2012~~causing ~~and~~their ~~2011~~effects ~~consisted~~to ofbe anti-dilutive using the ~~following:~~treasury stock method.

	As of March 31,
	2012			2011
Current deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Accrued expenses and other	$	117,126		$	266,225
Total current deferred tax assets		117,126			266,225
Non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities:
State taxes		18,781			(52,320	)
Stock options		192,720			44,761
Property, plant and equipment		(74,593	)		-
Intangibles		6,050			6,329
Others		2,340			2,340
Net operating losses		3,434,725			880,619
Total non-current deferred tax assets		3,580,023			881,729
Valuation allowance	(2,463,059		)		(1,147,954	)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)	$	1,234,090		$	-

Advertising Costs

~~F-17~~The Company expenses all costs of advertising as incurred. The Company expensed $14,058 and $5,052 of advertising costs during the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

~~During~~Stock-Based the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the valuation allowance increased by increased by $1,315,105 and decreased by $664,545, respectively. At March 31, 2012, we determined that our previous valuation allowance amounting to $1,234,090 for certain deferred tax assets consisting primarily of net operating loss carry forwards for federal and state tax reporting was not required as it is likely that these assets will be recovered through future operating income. At March 31, 2012, the Company had approximately $8.9 million of federal and state gross net operating losses allocated to continuing operations available. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2028 for federal purposes and 2018 for state purposes.Compensation

~~Based~~ASC on718, ~~the~~Share-Based ~~available~~Payment ~~objective~~requires ~~evidence,~~that compensation ~~including~~cost ~~the~~related ~~Company’s~~to ~~limited~~share-based ~~operating~~payment ~~history~~transactions ~~and~~be ~~current~~recognized ~~liabilities~~ in ~~excess of assets, management believes it is more likely than not that some of~~ the ~~net~~financial ~~deferred tax assets, specifically certain net operating losses, at March 31, 2012, will not be fully realizable~~statements. ~~Due~~Share-based topayment transactions within the ~~uncertainty~~scope ~~surrounding realization~~ of ~~the~~ASC ~~remaining~~718 ~~deferred~~include ~~tax~~stock ~~assets~~options, ~~the~~restricted ~~Company~~stock ~~has provided a valuation allowance of $2~~plans,~~463,059~~ ~~against~~performance-based ~~its net deferred tax assets at March 31~~awards, ~~2012;~~stock aappreciation ~~full valuation allowance was recorded at March 31~~rights, and ~~2011.~~employee Weshare ~~will~~purchase ~~continue to monitor the recoverability of our net deferred tax assets~~plans.

AsThe ~~of March 31, 2012 and 2011, the~~ Company ~~has~~adopted aASC ~~State tax liability of $0 and $25~~718,~~823,~~ ~~respectively,~~ which ~~was~~requires disclosure ~~the result~~ of ~~previously~~the ~~unpaid~~fair ~~taxes~~value ~~by SET Corp. Interest~~ and ~~penalties~~other oncharacteristics ~~such liabilities is immaterial. As~~ of ~~March~~stock ~~31,~~options ~~2012, the Company has recorded estimated taxes payable for Federal~~ and ~~State~~more ofprominent ~~$58,400~~disclosure ~~which~~about ~~is recorded in accrued liabilities. In addition, due to~~ the ~~significant~~effects ~~change in ownership~~ of ~~SET~~an ~~Corp in connection with the acquisition of Pro Water, the Company determined that SET Corp~~entity’s accounting ~~historical~~policy ~~NOLs~~decisions ~~have~~with ~~been~~respect ~~impaired~~to ~~due~~stock-based tocompensation ~~IRS~~on ~~Section~~reported ~~382~~net ~~limitations~~loss. ~~Thus,~~The asCompany ~~discussed~~has ~~above,~~reflected the ~~net~~expense of ~~operating~~such ~~losses~~stock ~~prior~~based tocompensation ~~July 7, 2010 have been reduced~~ based on the ~~Company's~~fair ~~calculation~~value ~~and~~at athe ~~partial~~grant ~~valuation~~date ~~allowance~~for ~~has~~awards ~~been~~consistent ~~recorded~~with asthe provisions of ~~March~~ASC ~~31, 2012~~718.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~connection ~~has~~with ~~filed~~the ~~all~~adoption ~~United~~of ~~States~~ASC ~~Federal~~718, the ~~and~~fair ~~State~~value ~~tax~~of ~~returns.~~our ~~The~~share-based ~~Company~~compensation has ~~identified~~been ~~the~~determined ~~United~~utilizing ~~States~~the ~~Federal~~Black-Scholes ~~tax~~pricing ~~returns as its “major” tax jurisdiction~~model. The ~~United~~fair ~~States~~value ~~Federal~~of the ~~return~~options ~~years~~granted ~~2008~~is ~~through~~amortized ~~2012~~as ~~are~~compensation ~~still~~expense ~~subject~~on toa ~~tax~~straight ~~examination~~line bybasis over the ~~United~~requisite ~~States~~service ~~Internal~~period ~~Revenue~~of ~~Service;~~the ~~however~~award, which weis dogenerally ~~not~~the ~~currently~~vesting ~~have~~period. ~~any~~The ~~ongoing~~fair ~~tax~~value ~~examinations.~~calculations ~~The~~involve ~~Company~~significant isjudgments, ~~subject~~assumptions, toestimates ~~examination~~and bycomplexities that impact the ~~California~~amount ~~Franchise~~of ~~Tax~~compensation ~~Board~~expense ~~for~~to ~~the~~be ~~years~~recorded ~~ended~~in ~~2007~~current ~~through~~and ~~2012~~future ~~and~~periods. ~~currently~~Upon ~~does~~option ~~not~~exercise, ~~have~~the ~~any~~Company issues ~~ongoing~~new ~~tax~~shares ~~examinations~~of stock.

~~Note~~The 9following –weighted ~~Stockholders’~~average ~~Equity~~variables ~~(Deficit)~~were used in the Black Scholes model for all option issuances valued during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.

General

Year ended

March 31,

Stock Price at

Grant Date

Dividend

Yield

Exercise Price

Risk Free

Interest Rate

Volatility

Average

Life

2013

0.25

–%

0.25

1.73%

213%

10.0

2012

1.02

–%

1.02

0.83%

264%

5.5

OnThe ~~December~~Company's 9,accounting ~~2011,~~policy afor ~~majority~~equity instruments ofissued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the ~~Company’s~~provisions ~~shareholders~~of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”, codified into ASC 505. The measurement date for the ~~form~~fair value of athe ~~written~~equity ~~consent~~instruments ~~authorized~~issued is determined at the ~~amendment~~earlier of (i) the ~~Company’s~~date ~~Amended~~at ~~and~~which ~~Restated~~a ~~Articles~~commitment offor ~~Incorporation~~performance toby ~~decrease~~the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the ~~authorized~~date ~~number~~at ofwhich ~~shares~~the consultant or vendor's performance is complete. In the case of ~~common~~equity instruments ~~stock~~issued to ~~100~~consultants,~~000,000. The~~ ~~amendment~~the ~~was~~fair ~~made~~value ~~effective~~of onthe ~~January~~equity ~~19,~~instrument ~~2012~~is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.

~~Reverse~~Segment ~~stock split~~ Reporting

OnThe ~~January~~Company 25reports its segments under ASC 280, ~~2012~~Segment Reporting, ~~the~~which ~~Financial~~establishes ~~Industries~~standards ~~Regulatory~~for ~~Authority~~reporting ~~("FINRA")~~information ~~effected~~regarding aoperating 1segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information for 15those ~~reverse~~segments ~~stock~~to ~~split~~be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. ~~All~~ ASC ~~share~~280 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and ~~per~~services ~~share~~and ~~information~~geographic ~~has~~areas. ~~been~~Operating ~~adjusted~~segments are toidentified ~~give~~as ~~effect~~components toof ~~the~~an ~~stock~~enterprise ~~split~~about which separate discrete financial information is available for ~~all~~evaluation ~~periods~~by the ~~presented~~chief operating decision maker, ~~including~~or ~~all~~decision ~~references~~making ~~throughout~~group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, the ~~consolidated~~Company ~~financial~~has ~~statements~~two segments: Pro Water and ~~accompanying~~SET ~~notes~~Corp, with Pro Water being the only revenue producing segment.

~~Series A Preferred Stock~~F-12

AsIncome of March 31, 2012, there are no shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A”) outstanding as all had been converted into common stock prior to the reverse acquisition. Each Series A share is convertible into six shares of the Company’s common stock one year after issuance. In additions, the Series A has preference over the common stock related to dividends and liquidation. Upon the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of Series A, the Company shall not, either directly or indirectly by amendment, merger, consolidation or otherwise, do any of the following without (in addition to any other vote required by law or the Articles of Incorporation) the written consent or affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the then outstanding shares of Series A, given in writing or by vote at a meeting, consenting or voting (as the case may be) separately as a class.Taxes

InThe ~~the event the~~ Company ~~shall~~follows atASC ~~any~~740, ~~time~~Income ~~after~~Taxes for recording the ~~Series~~provision Afor ~~original~~income ~~issue~~taxes. ~~date~~The asset and ~~prior~~liability toapproach ~~three~~is ~~years~~used ~~from~~to ~~such~~recognize ~~date,~~deferred ~~issue~~tax ~~additional~~assets ~~shares~~and ~~of common stock, without consideration or~~ liabilities for ~~a consideration per share less than~~ the ~~applicable~~expected ~~Series~~future Atax ~~conversion~~consequences ~~price~~of ~~($0.375/share)~~temporary indifferences ~~effect~~between ~~immediately~~the ~~prior~~carrying toamounts ~~such~~and ~~issue, then~~ the ~~Series~~tax Abases ~~conversion~~of ~~price~~assets ~~shall~~and liabilities. beTax ~~reduced,~~law ~~concurrently~~and ~~with~~rate ~~such~~changes ~~issue,~~are toreflected ~~the~~in ~~consideration~~income ~~per~~in ~~share received by~~ the ~~Company~~period ~~for~~ such ~~issue~~changes orare ~~deemed~~enacted. ~~issue~~The ofCompany ~~the~~records ~~additional~~a ~~shares~~valuation allowance ofto ~~common~~reduce ~~stock;~~deferred ~~provided~~tax ~~that~~assets ifto ~~such~~the ~~issuance~~amount orthat ~~deemed~~is ~~issuance~~more ~~was~~likely ~~without~~than ~~consideration,~~not ~~then~~to ~~the Company shall~~ be ~~deemed to have received an aggregate of $0~~realized.15 ofThe ~~consideration~~Company ~~for~~includes ~~all~~interest and ~~such~~penalties ~~additional~~related ~~shares~~to ofincome ~~common~~taxes, ~~stock~~including ~~issued~~unrecognized ortax ~~deemed to be issued~~benefits, ~~and~~within the ~~conversion~~income ~~ratio~~tax ~~will be changed accordingly~~provision.

FThe Company’s income tax returns are based on calculations and assumptions that are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. In addition, the calculation of the Company’s tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. The Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on a two-18step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. While the Company believes it has appropriate support for the positions taken on its tax returns, the Company regularly assesses the potential outcomes of examinations by tax authorities in determining the adequacy of its provision for income taxes. The Company continually assesses the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjusts the income tax provision, income taxes payable and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.

~~Capital~~The ~~Contributions~~Company recognizes windfall tax benefits associated with share-based awards directly to stockholders’ equity only when realized. A windfall tax benefit occurs when the actual tax benefit realized by the Company upon an employee's disposition of a share-based award exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the award that the Company had recorded. When assessing whether a tax benefit relating to share-based compensation has been realized, the Company follows the tax law ordering method, under which current year share-based compensation deductions are assumed to be utilized before net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes.

~~During~~Recent ~~the~~Accounting ~~year ended March 31, 2011, the former owner of PWU contributed $150,000 to that entity.~~Pronouncements

~~Reverse~~In ~~Acquisition~~July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, "Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment" ("ASU 2012-02"). ASU 2012-02 simplifies the requirements for testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill and permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative fair value test. This new guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2013 and will be applied prospectively. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company or its consolidated financial statements.

~~On the Effective Date, July 7, 2010, 7,132,193 shares of common stock were retained by SET Corp’s shareholders as a result of the reverse acquisition. See~~ Note 13 ~~for~~– ~~additional~~Intangible ~~information~~Assets

~~Common~~Customer ~~Stock Issued For Cash~~Relationships

The customer relationship is being amortized over the period of seven years from the acquisition date of October 1, 2009. The goodwill is not subject to amortization and will not be deductible for income tax purposes. During the ~~year~~years ended March 31, ~~2011~~2013 and 2012, the Company ~~received~~recorded ~~proceeds~~amortization ~~totaling~~expense to cost of goods sold related to the customer relationship of $~~208~~28,~~000~~860 ~~resulting~~and in$28,936, respectively. The net carrying value of the customer ~~issuance~~relationship as of ~~468~~March 31,~~000~~ ~~shares~~2013 was $101,248. Future amortization expense of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~customer relationship is expected to be as follows for the years ending March 31: $28,860, $28,860, $28,860, and $14,668 in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Goodwill represents expected synergies from the merger of operations. These synergies include a full management team and a formalized corporate organizational structure to expand the operations. In addition, there were limited intangible assets in which did not qualify for separate recognition, such as an established workforce, but the effects on the consolidated financial statements are immaterial.

~~During~~Pending the year ended March 31, 2012, the Company received proceeds totaling $2,301,250, net of finders' fees of $73,750 resulting in the issuance of 1,500,000 common stock units, consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant per unit. The warrants issued had a weighted average exercise price of $2.33 per share, vested immediately and a weighted average term of 1.3 years. See Note 10 for additional warrants granted.Patents

~~Common~~In ~~Stock~~connection ~~Issued~~with tothe ~~Related~~pending ~~Parties~~patents ~~for~~acquired from ~~Accrued~~WES ~~Liabilities~~(See Note 1), the Company amortized the value of the patents over an estimated life of 15 years, which was the approximate remaining life and ~~Services~~projected cash flows of the pending patents. During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company amortized $10,000, which is included in general and administrative expense. During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company, the Company recorded $108,335 of impairment fully impairing the carrying value of the intangible assets, which is reflected in the statements of operations due to future expected cash flows not exceeding the carrying value of the assets.

On July 7, 2010, the Company issued 933,333 shares of its common stock to Grant King, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Director in exchange for the conversion of $357,000 of unpaid, accrued and other compensations due to Mr. King.F-13

OnNote ~~July~~4 7,– ~~2010,~~Property ~~the Company issued 650,000 shares of its common stock to Bob Glaser, an Officer~~ and ~~Director in exchange for the conversion of $248,625 of unpaid and accrued compensation due to Mr. Glaser.~~Equipment

OnProperty ~~July 7, 2010, the Company issued 466,667 shares of its common stock to Keith Morlock, an Officer~~ and ~~Director~~equipment inare ~~exchange~~as ~~for the conversion of $178,500 of unpaid and accrued compensation due to Mr. Morlock.~~follows:

On July 8, 2010, the Company issued 66,667 shares of its common stock to Grant King, the Company’s former Chairman of the Board, from its 2006 Incentive and Non Statutory Stock Option Plan in exchange for the conversion of $59,800 of unpaid and accrued compensation due to Mr. King.

	March 31, 2013			March 31, 2012

Injection wells	$	3,902,774		$	613,976
Machinery and equipment		3,983,618			1,623,596
Construction in progress		2,479,907			71,476
Buildings		87,500			7,500
Land		51,000			51,000
Furniture and fixtures		4,188			36,465
Accumulated depreciation		(571,371	)		(250,639	)
Total	$	9,937,616		$	2,153,374

InDuring ~~December~~the ~~2010~~years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company ~~issued~~recorded ~~96,166~~depreciation ~~shares~~expense of ~~its~~$377,800 ~~common~~and ~~stock~~$155,064, ~~valued~~respectively. atCash flows of approximately $513,~~690~~500,000 are needed to ~~various~~complete ~~individuals~~the onconstruction ~~behalf~~in ofprogress ~~Grant~~for ~~King,~~another well in which the Company’s ~~former~~is ~~Chief~~in ~~Executive~~the ~~Officer~~process ~~and~~of ~~former~~securing, ~~Director~~although inno ~~exchange~~guarantees can ~~for~~be ~~the~~made. ~~conversion~~The amount of ~~$51,690~~idle ofconstruction ~~unpaid~~in progress at March 31, ~~accrued~~2013 was $2,479,907 and ~~other~~$0, ~~compensations~~respectively. ~~due~~We expect the well to ~~Mr.~~be ~~King~~completed by the end of fiscal year 2014.

OnAsset ~~December~~Retirement 31, 2010, the Company entered into a twenty-four (24) month consulting agreement with Grant King, the former Officer and Director of the Company on the date of grant. Under the agreement, the Company agreed to issue a total of 533,333 shares of common stock in 133,333 increments every six months, payable at the beginning of each six-month period. On the date of the agreement, the Company valued the 533,333 shares at $400,000 based upon the closing market price of the Company’s common stock. The value of the shares will be expensed over the two-year service period. On January 5, 2011, the Company issued the first 133,333 shares of common stock pursuant to the consulting agreement. On September 19, 2011, the Company issued the second 133,333 shares of common stock pursuant to the consulting agreement. On January 9, 2012, the Company issued the third 133,333 shares of common stock pursuant to the consulting agreement. During the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded compensation expense of $200,000 and $50,000, respectively, to general and administrative expenses in connection with this agreement. See Note 10 for estimated stock-based compensation to be recorded in future years.Obligations

OnAsset ~~January~~Retirement 13Obligations (“AROs”) provide for costs related to future disposal of assets. ARO accounting is specified by ASC 410-20. ARO includes remediation work necessary to restore a property, ~~2011~~cleanup around an injection well, and removal of improvements to a site. It does not apply to unplanned cleanup costs, such as from an accident. The ARO liability is recognized in the ~~Company’s~~period ~~Board~~it ofwas ~~Directors~~incurred, ~~approved~~such as at acquisition or construction. The liability equals the ~~issuance~~present value of ~~141,667~~the ~~shares~~expected cost of ~~common~~retirement/remediation. ~~stock~~An ~~valued~~asset atequal ~~$106,250~~to the initial liability is added to ~~various~~the ~~officers~~cost of the asset, and ~~consultants~~depreciated over the life of the asset, ~~Company~~which asis ~~discretionary~~20 ~~compensation~~years ~~bonuses~~for Pro Water’s injection wells. ~~Compensation~~The ~~bonuses~~liability ~~for~~is ~~stock~~accreted ~~came~~up ~~from~~to its expected cost with accretion expense recorded as interest expense in the ~~2010~~statements ~~Plan~~of operations. ~~The~~At ~~corresponding~~March ~~expense~~31, ~~was~~2013 and 2012, the Company recorded an asset retirement obligations of approximately $35,900 and $9,900 related to ~~general~~the Cartwright well and ~~administrative~~DIW ~~expense~~as long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded additions to asset retirement obligation of $26,000.

~~F-19~~Note 5 – Certain Balance Sheet Elements

OnAccrued ~~December 28, 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock at $1.05 to Bill Ball, a former member of the Board of Directors of the Company, as compensation.~~Liabilities

~~Common~~The ~~Stock~~Company’s ~~Issued~~accrued ~~for~~liabilities ~~Services~~are as follows:

On July 7, 2010, the Company issued 33,333 shares of its common stock as compensation for past legal services of $9,887 to a third-party consultant which offset amounts payable to the consultant.

	March 31, 2013		March 31, 2012

Accrued interest	$	33,747	$	13,624
Accrued interest – related party		–		25,647
Royalties payable		96,247		61,995
Sales tax payable		108,968		–
Other		25,000		76,820
Total	$	263,962	$	178,086

OnNote ~~December 15, 2010, the Company issued~~ 6~~,381~~ ~~shares~~– ofNotes ~~its common stock valued at $3,158 as compensation for past consulting services of $3,158 to a third-party consultant which offset amounts payable to the consultant.~~Payable

OnNote ~~January~~Payable ~~9, 2012, the Company issued 30,050 shares of its common stock as compensation for administrative and legal services of $36,060~~ to ~~various third-party consultants.~~Vendor

~~Common~~On ~~Stock~~July ~~Issued~~7, 2010, the Company assumed a promissory note to ~~Settle~~a ~~Accounts~~vendor ~~Payable~~in settlement of $410,500. The vendor manufactured and ~~Accrued~~installed ~~Liabilities~~the Company’s discontinued water treatment facility. The note bore interest at 10% per annum with a one-time default penalty of 10% of the principal balance, and was secured by the Company’s Interceptor Plant contract and the equipment that was manufactured by the vendor. During the year ended March 31, 2012, due to the passage of the statute of limitations the Company wrote off to other income the $410,500 note and accrued interest and penalties of $214,409. The Company received a legal opinion supporting such in connection with the former liability. See Note 10 for discussion of pending litigation related to the promissory note.

On October 26, 2010, the Company reached a settlement with Catalyx Fluid Solutions, Inc. and all its partners, including Juzer Jangbarwala, formerly a Company director and member of management. Accrued liabilities and accounts payable of $478,407 were settled for $50,000 in cash payments and 45,000 shares of common stock valued at $22,275 on the date of issuance. The Company accounted for the excess amount forgiven of $445,364 as contributed capital recorded within additional paidF-~~in capital due to the related party nature of the transaction.~~14

OnConvertible ~~November~~Note Payable 1,to 2010, the Company reached a settlement with a vendor. Accrued liabilities and accounts payable of $16,514 and $10,000, respectively, were settled for $7,465 in cash payments and 20,000 shares of common stock valued at $9,900. The shares of common stock were issued on December 15, 2010. As a result, a gain on settlement of $9,149 was recorded as other income expense.WES

InOn ~~March~~August ~~2011~~27, 2010, in connection with the Agreement, the Company ~~reached~~issued a ~~settlement~~convertible ~~with~~promissory anote ~~former~~to ~~consultant~~WES ~~for~~ in ~~which~~the ~~past~~amount ~~due~~of ~~accrued~~$200,000, ~~liabilities~~without ~~and~~interest or ~~accounts~~maturity, ~~payable~~convertible into Company common stock at a rate of $~~161,600~~5.25 ~~were~~per ~~settled~~share. ~~for~~The ~~$15~~convertible note payable was payable at the Company’s discretion. The note was secured by the Technology. On the date of issuance,~~000~~ no beneficial conversion feature was present. The Company determined that they would pay the note in ~~cash~~approximately ~~payments~~15 ~~and~~years. 13Thus,~~333~~ ~~shares~~the Company recorded a discount of 11% ~~common~~in ~~stock~~the ~~valued~~amount atof $6157,~~600~~159 against the notes. AsThe adiscount ~~result~~was to be amortized to interest expense over the period of estimated maturity using the effective interest method. During the year ended March 31, a2012, ~~gain~~the onCompany ~~settlement~~recorded interest expense of $~~140~~4,~~000~~365, and ~~was~~extinguished ~~recorded~~the asrelated ~~other~~unamortized ~~income~~discount ~~expense~~of $146,683 to additional paid-in capital. See Note 1 for information regarding the Transaction with WES.

OnMOU ~~November~~Note ~~16, 2011, the Company issued 5,179 shares of its common stock to a vendor at $1.95 per share for the settlement of accounts payable of $10,100.~~Payable

~~Common~~On ~~Stock~~July ~~Issued~~7, 2010, the Company assumed a promissory note of $45,000 in connection with a memorandum of understanding to ~~Settle~~purchase ~~Notes~~SET ~~Payable~~Corp’s discontinued water treatment plant. The note bears interest at 10% with a default rate of 18%. As of March 31, 2013, the note is in default and interest is being accrued at the default rate.

~~See~~Yates ~~Note 7 for Convertible Notes Payable converted in to common stock.~~Petroleum

~~Common~~As ~~Stock~~discussed ~~Repurchased~~in the Company's prior SEC filings, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, on August 2, 2010, in connection with cross complaint brought by Yates Petroleum ("Yates") against the Company in the District Court of Johnson County, Wyoming (Case no. CV-2008-0102), Yates' motion to continue hearing on summary judgment was denied, and the Company's motion for alternative dispute resolution was granted. As of November 30, 2010 an agreement, via arbitration, was reached. The Company entered into an agreement dated November 30, 2010 which required that the Company pay a total of $175,000, incurring interest at 10% per annum, payable in 24 equal payments. As of March 31, 2013, the note was paid off.

OnEquipment ~~October 20, 2011, the Company repurchased 3,333 shares of common stock from an investor at $1.15 per share. The shares were cancelled and therefore are not shown as issued or outstanding.~~Loan

~~F-20~~In June 2010, the Company entered into a note payable agreement with an equipment provider for a machine in the amount of $38,745. The note bears interest at 7.25% per annum and is payable in 24 equal installments of $1,739, with the first installment due in July 2010. As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, the amount due on this loan was $0 and $5,275, respectively.

Related Party Convertible Note 10Payable –to Metropolitan ~~Options~~Real ~~and~~Estate ~~Warrants~~LLC

~~Options~~On July 1, 2010, in connection with the acquisition of Pro Water Utah, the Company entered into a $2.0 million convertible note payable with Metropolitan Real Estate LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Horst Geicke, a beneficial owner of the Company. Under the current terms of the convertible note payable, $1,600,000 of the note may be converted at $3.00 per share and $400,000 may be converted at $0.375 per share. The convertible note incurs interest at 5% per annum and secured by Pro Water Utah assets. The Company is to make 60 monthly payments of $35,478 commencing January 2011 and concluding December 2015, which was extended until April 2016 by the holder during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 due to lack of cash flows sufficient to make payments.

~~Plans~~Since the conversion price of $0.375 related to $400,000 was significantly less than the fair value of the Company’s common stock per the closing market price, a beneficial conversion feature was present. The Company valued the beneficial conversion feature as of the date of the amended agreement in the amount of $696,000, and recorded the maximum discount allowed of $400,000 against the note. At March 31, 2013, the outstanding balance of $1,170,584, net of the unamortized discount of $134,082 was classified as long term based on its subsequent conversion on April 12, 2013 as discussed below. During the year ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $109,228 and $139,146 of the discount or 8% and 9% of the liability to interest expense, respectively, using the effective interest method. As of March 31, 2013, $26,648 of accrued interest was classified as long-term liabilities due to its subsequent conversion.

On ~~July~~April 712, ~~2010~~2013, aMetropolitan ~~majority~~Real ofEstate LLC ~~the~~agreed ~~Company’s~~to ~~shareholders,~~convert inits ~~the~~outstanding ~~form~~principal ofbalance ~~a written consent authorized: the amendment~~ of ~~the~~$1,304,666 ~~Company’s Amended~~ and ~~Restated~~accrued ~~Articles~~interest of ~~Incorporation~~$28,951 ~~approved~~into ~~the~~10,258,589 ~~adoption~~shares of restricted ~~the~~common ~~Company’s~~stock, ~~2010~~valued ~~Incentive~~at ~~and~~$0.13 ~~Nonstatutory~~per ~~Stock~~share. ~~Option~~The ~~Plan~~unamortized ~~(“2010~~discount ~~Plan”),~~of ~~which reserves 1~~$130,333~~,333~~ ~~shares~~was ofcharged ~~the Company’s common stock for issuance as stock options and grants~~ to ~~qualified recipients~~expense. AsThe ofCompany ~~March~~is determining ~~31,~~the ~~2012,~~accounting ~~424,712~~the ~~shares~~accounting ~~were~~impact ~~available~~but ~~for~~is ~~issuance~~expected ~~under~~to ~~the~~record ~~2010~~additional ~~Plan~~interest expense.

OnRelated ~~the~~Party ~~Effective~~Note ~~Date,~~Payable ~~the Company assumed an Incentive and Non-statutory Stock Option Plan adopted by the predecessor entity for issuance of stock options~~ to ~~employees~~Bridgewell ~~and~~Worldwide others. Those plans consisted of the 2006 Incentive and Non-statutory Stock Option Plan (“2006 Plan”) and 2007 Incentive and Non-statutory Stock Option Plan (“2007 Plan”) for issuances of stock options to employees and others. Under the 2006 Plan and 2007 Plan, the Company reserved 666,667 and 400,000 shares for issuance, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, 118,897 and 31,367 grants were available for issuance under the 2006 Plan and 2007 Plan, respectively.Limited

~~Issuances~~In September of 2012, PWCO entered into a revolving loan agreement with Bridgewell Worldwide Limited, of which Grant King is as an officer and owner of, in the amount of $2,000,000. The note incurs interest at 5% per annum and is due in full in September 2014. The loan was personally guaranteed by the Company’s former Director and Corporate Secretary, Keith Morlock and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Robert Glaser but not by the Company. In connection with the terminated Project Finance Transaction with PWCO (see Note 1), the Company has been advanced funds from PWCO to cover payables and the cost of constructing the Cartwright Well.

~~On July 7, 2010, the Company granted 400,000 stock options to various employees and consultants with an exercise price of $0.375 per share. The options vested over one year.~~F-15

OnAn ~~April~~additional 4$300,000 was ~~2011,~~funded in February 2013 under an Amended and Restated Revolving Note Agreement which included the ~~Company~~following; ~~granted~~a) ~~200~~the principal amount shall be increased to $2,300,000, ~~stock~~plus ~~options~~5% interest; b) the personal guarantees of Morlock and Glaser shall be terminated, and in exchange, the ProWater shall grant a first priority security interest to ~~directors~~Bridgewell in the Cartwright Well ; and lastly c) upon the mutual consent of the Company ~~with~~and anBridgewell, ~~exercise~~any ~~price~~outstanding principal and interest may be converted at any time, into common stock of $0the Company.75 ~~per~~As ~~share.~~of ~~The~~March ~~options~~31, ~~vest~~2013, ~~over~~the ~~one~~amount ~~year~~due on these advances was $2,300,000 and is classified as long-term in the accompanying balance sheet based on its terms and subsequent conversion. ~~Compensation~~During ~~bonuses~~the ~~for~~year ~~stock~~ended ~~came~~March ~~from~~31, 2013, the ~~2010~~Company ~~Plan~~capitalized interest of $50,000 under property and equipment in the accompanying balance sheet.

On ~~May~~April 930, ~~2011~~2013, ~~the~~Bridgewell ~~Company~~notified ~~granted~~us that ~~36,667~~they ~~stock~~wanted ~~options~~ to aconvert ~~consultant~~the ~~with~~Amended anand ~~exercise~~Restated ~~price~~Revolving Loan Agreement into 18,153,846 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $0.9013 per share, ~~from~~making the ~~2010~~Amended ~~Plan~~and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement paid in full, and of no further effect. The Company ~~options~~is ~~immediately~~still ~~vested~~determining on the ~~date~~accounting impact of ~~issuance~~this transaction.

OnNote ~~October~~ 7, ~~2011,~~– ~~the~~Income ~~Company granted 80,000 stock options to three members of the Board of Directors with an exercise price of $1.20 per share. The options vest over one year.~~taxes

OnThe ~~March~~following ~~27,~~table ~~2012,~~presents the ~~Company~~current ~~granted~~and deferred ~~75,000~~income ~~stock~~tax ~~options~~provision tofor ~~Grant~~federal ~~King~~and atstate anincome ~~exercise~~taxes ~~price~~for ofthe ~~$1.30~~years ~~per~~ended ~~share. The~~March ~~options~~31, ~~vest~~2013 ~~over~~and ~~one year.~~2012:

On March 27, 2012, the Company granted common stock to three board members which vest over a twenty-four (24) month period, starting April 1, 2012 and then the first of each quarter thereafter (ending January 1, 2014). Under the agreement, the Company agreed to issue a total of 450,000 shares of common stock valued at $585,000 on the date of grant, with the first tranche of 56,250 shares recorded as general and administrative expense during the year ended March 31, 2012 valued at $73,125. The remaining 393,750 shares are valued at $511,875 in which $292,500 will be recognized as general and administrative expense in fiscal 2013 and $219,375 in fiscal 2014.

	Year Ended March 31,
	2013		2012
Current tax provision:
Federal	$	2,132	$	35,800
State		3,222		28,015
Total		5,354		63,815
Deferred tax provision (benefit)
Federal		164,265		(2,270,083	)
State		3,586		(279,113	)
Valuation allowance		498,866		1,315,106
Total		666,717		(1,234,090	)
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes	$	672,071	$	(1,170,275	)

OnReconciliations ~~March~~of ~~31, 2012,~~ the ~~Company~~U.S. ~~granted~~federal ~~108,333~~statutory ~~stock~~rate ~~options~~ to ~~three officers of~~ the ~~Company~~actual tax atrate anfor ~~exercise~~the ~~price~~years ofended ~~$1.25~~March ~~per~~31, ~~share. The~~2013 ~~options~~and ~~vest~~2012 ~~over~~are ~~one~~as ~~year.~~follows:

During the year ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, stock compensation expense, including share grants which have vesting terms to Grant King (disclosed in Note 9) and members of management (disclosed above) was $579,382 and $164,771, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, future compensation expense, including share grants which vest in future periods for the years ending March 31, 2013 and 2014 is $717,916 and $219,375, respectively.

	Year Ended March 31,
	2013			2012
US federal statutory income tax rate		34.0%			34.0%
State tax – net of benefit		3.3 %			3.3 %
		37.3 %			37.3 %

Permanent differences		41.3 %			10.5 %
Changes of deferred tax assets		112.6 %			6.0 %
Net operating losses and other		2.94%			(40.5%	)
Increase in valuation allowance		(82.7%	)		(121.2%	)
Effective tax rate		111.44%			(107.9%	)

~~F-21~~The components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and (liabilities) for federal and state income taxes as of March 31, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following:

Although management believes its estimate regarding the fair value of the services to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that all of the subjective assumptions will remain constant, and therefore the valuation of the services may not be a reliable measure of the fair value of stock compensation or stock based payments for consulting services. Expected volatility is based primarily on historical volatility. Historical volatility was computed using weekly pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the remaining life of the options. We believe this method produces an estimate that is representative of our expectations of future volatility over the expected term of these options. We currently have no reason to believe future volatility over the expected remaining life of these options is likely to differ materially from historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining term of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities.

	As of March 31,
	2013			2012
Current deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Accrued expenses and other	$	42,279		$	117,126
Total current deferred tax assets		42,279			117,126
Non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities:
State taxes		23,372			18,781
Stock options		263,618			192,720
Property, plant and equipment		(102,897	)		(74,593	)
Intangibles		10,333			6,050
Others		2,340			2,340
Net operating losses		3,277,840			3,434,725
Total non-current deferred tax assets		3,474,606			3,580,023
Valuation allowance	(2,961,925		)		(2,463,059	)
Total non-current deferred tax assets		512,681			1,116,964
Net deferred tax assets	$	554,960		$	1,234,090

~~The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options:~~F-16

	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at March 31, 2010	-	$	-
Options granted	715,263		1.35
Options exercised	-		-
Options cancelled	(113,333)		0.60
Outstanding at March 31, 2011	601,930		1.50
Options granted	500,000		1.02
Options exercised	(20,000)		0.75
Options cancelled	(216,930)		3.26
Outstanding at March 31, 2012	865,000	$	0.77	4.20	$	536,459
Exercisable at March 31, 2012	638,825	$	0.60	3.24	$	385,930

During the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the valuation allowance increased by $498,866 and $1,315,105, respectively. At March 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $8.4 million of federal and state gross net operating losses allocated to continuing operations available. See below for potential impairment subsequent to year end. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2028 for federal purposes and 2018 for state purposes.

	Exercisable			Unexercisable			Total
Stock Options	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Above $1.39	-	$	-	-	$	-	-	$	-
Below $1.39	638,825		0.60	226,175		1.25	865,000		0.77
Total Outstanding	638,825	$	0.60	226,175	$	1.25	865,000	$	0.77

Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company’s limited operating history and current liabilities in excess of assets, management believes it is more likely than not that some of the net deferred tax assets, specifically certain net operating losses, at March 31, 2013, will not be fully realizable. In addition, subsequent to year end significant shares were issued to a shareholders in connection with the conversion of notes payable and a subscription for the purchase of common stock. In connection, with these issuances the Company determined that the historical NOLs have probably been impaired due to IRS Section 382 limitations. Due to the uncertainty surrounding realization of the remaining deferred tax assets, specifically the NOLs, the Company has provided a valuation allowance of $2,961,925 and $2,463,059 against its net deferred tax assets at March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We will continue to monitor the recoverability of our net deferred tax assets.

~~Warrants~~As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has a State tax liability of $0 and $0, respectively, which was the result of previously unpaid taxes by SET Corp. Interest and penalties on such liabilities is immaterial. As of March 31, 2013, the Company has recorded approximately $2,000 and $3,000 for estimated taxes payable for Federal and State, respectively.

OnThe ~~the Effective Date, the~~ Company ~~assumed~~has ~~376,068~~filed ofall ~~the~~United ~~predecessor~~States ~~entity’s issued~~ Federal and ~~outstanding~~State ~~common~~tax ~~stock~~returns. ~~purchase~~The ~~warrants,~~Company ~~previously~~has ~~treated~~identified ~~as equity pursuant to~~ the ~~derivative~~United ~~treatment~~States ~~exemption,~~Federal ~~that~~tax ~~were~~returns noas ~~longer~~its ~~afforded~~“major” ~~equity~~tax ~~treatment~~jurisdiction. The ~~Accordingly,~~United ~~these~~States ~~warrants~~Federal ~~are~~return ~~recorded~~years as2009 ~~liabilities~~through at2013 ~~fair~~are ~~value~~still atsubject ~~each~~to ~~reporting~~tax ~~date.~~examination ~~Currently,~~by ~~these~~the ~~warrants~~United ~~have~~States anInternal ~~exercise price of $11.70 and expire in May of 2013~~Revenue Service; however, ~~these~~we ~~warrants~~do ~~have~~not ~~exercise~~currently ~~price~~have ~~reset~~any ~~features~~ongoing intax ~~the~~examinations. ~~event~~The ~~the~~ Company ~~issues~~is ~~common~~subject ~~stock~~to ~~below~~examination by the ~~exercise~~California Franchise ~~price~~Tax ofBoard ~~the~~for ~~warrants. During~~ the years ended ~~March~~2008 ~~31,~~through ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011,~~currently ~~the~~does ~~Company~~not ~~recorded~~have ~~gain~~any ofongoing ~~$127,438~~tax ~~and loss of $102,584, respectively, for the change in fair value of the warrant liability~~examinations. ~~As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, the warrant liability was $119,846 and $247,284, respectively.~~

~~F-22~~Note 8 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

All future changes in the fair value of these warrants will be recognized currently in earnings until such time as the warrants are exercised or expire. These common stock purchase warrants do not trade in an active securities market, and as such, we estimate the fair value of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:General

	March 31, 2012	March 31, 2011
Annual dividend yield	-		-
Expected life in years	1.17		2.17
Risk-free interest rate	0.19%		0.80%
Expected volatility	176.17%		284%

On December 9, 2011, a majority of the Company’s shareholders, in the form of a written consent authorized the amendment of the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to decrease the authorized number of shares of common stock to 100,000,000. The amendment was made effective on January 19, 2012.

~~Expected~~Reverse ~~volatility~~stock is based primarily on historical volatility. Historical volatility was computed using weekly pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the remaining life of the warrants. We believe this method produces an estimate that is representative of our expectations of future volatility over the expected term of these warrants. We currently have no reason to believe future volatility over the expected remaining life of these warrants is likely to differ materially from historical volatility. The expected life is based on the remaining term of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury securities.split

~~The~~On ~~following~~January is25, a2012, ~~summary~~the ofFinancial ~~activity~~Industries Regulatory ofAuthority ~~outstanding~~("FINRA") ~~common~~effected ~~stock~~a ~~warrants~~1 for 15 reverse stock split. All share and per share information has been adjusted to give effect to the ~~years~~stock ~~ended~~split ~~March~~for 31all periods presented, ~~2012~~including all references throughout the consolidated financial statements and ~~2011:~~accompanying notes.

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance, March 31, 2010		-		$	-
Warrants granted		1,456,431			6.90
Warrants exercised			-		-
Warrants cancelled		(95,596	)		3.45
Balance, March 31, 2011		1,360,835		$	7.20
Warrants granted		1,500,00			2.33
Warrants exercised			-		-
Warrants cancelled		(855,333	)		5.08
Balance, March 31, 2012		2,005,502		$	4.45
Exercisable, March 31, 2012		2,005,502		$	4.45

Series A Preferred Stock

~~Note~~As 11of –March ~~Commitments~~31, 2013, there are no shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A”) outstanding as all had been converted into common stock prior to the reverse acquisition. Each Series A share is convertible into six shares of the Company’s common stock one year after issuance. In additions, the Series A has preference over the common stock related to dividends and ~~Contingencies~~liquidation. Upon the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of Series A, the Company shall not, either directly or indirectly by amendment, merger, consolidation or otherwise, do any of the following without (in addition to any other vote required by law or the Articles of Incorporation) the written consent or affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the then outstanding shares of Series A, given in writing or by vote at a meeting, consenting or voting (as the case may be) separately as a class.

~~Operating~~In ~~Leases~~the event the Company shall at any time after the Series A original issue date and prior to three years from such date, issue additional shares of common stock, without consideration or for a consideration per share less than the applicable Series A conversion price ($0.375/share) in effect immediately prior to such issue, then the Series A conversion price shall be reduced, concurrently with such issue, to the consideration per share received by the Company for such issue or deemed issue of the additional shares of common stock; provided that if such issuance or deemed issuance was without consideration, then the Company shall be deemed to have received an aggregate of $0.15 of consideration for all such additional shares of common stock issued or deemed to be issued, and the conversion ratio will be changed accordingly.

InCommon ~~September~~Stock ~~2010,~~Issued For

Filing Compare · Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corp