UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from	To


Commission File Number :	000-29397

MONTAVO, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		33-0619528
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


4957 Lakemont Blvd. Suite 239, Bellevue, Washington		98006
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


	425-747-5500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


	Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days. Yes x No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No x

As of December 22, 2010, 70,599,741 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

MONTAVO, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

Part I

Financial Information

Page

Item 1.

Unaudited Financial Statements:

Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and

December 31, 2009

Condensed Statements of Operations

(unaudited) for the three and nine months ended

September 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the period

from inception to September 30, 2010………………………

Condensed Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (unaudited)

for the period from inception to September 30, 2010………………………

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine

months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the

period from inception to September 30, 2010

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Part II

Other Information

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4.

Removed and Reserved

Item 5.

Other Information

Item 6.

Exhibits

Signatures

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MONTAVO, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


				September 30,		December 31,
				2010		2009
			(in thousands, except share amounts)
ASSETS
Current assets:
	Prepaid expenses and other assets		$	100	$	164

		Total current assets		100		164


		Total assets	$	100	$	164


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities:
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	371	$	327
	Accounts payable - related parties			560		344
	Note payable to stockholder			25		25
	Accrued interest			8		3
	Convertible debt, net of discount of $37 and $10, respectively			83		10
	Note payable			14		-
	Embedded fair value derivative liabilities			146		4

		Total current liabilities		1,207		713

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity (deficit):
	Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 25,000,000 and 5,000,000 shares
	authorized at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively,
	and no shares issued and outstanding			-		-
	Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.001 par value;
	400,000,000 and 99,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2010
	and December 31, 2009, respectively: 59,349,741 and 43,418,467
	shares issued and outstanding, respectively			3,585		2,978
	Deficit accumulated during the development stage			(4,692)		(3,527)

		Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(1,107)		(549)

		Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	100	$	164

See notes to condensed financial statements

MONTAVO, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


											December 23, 2004
											(Inception)
		Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,					To
					2009				2009		September 30,
			2010		(RESTATED)		2010		(RESTATED)		2010
		(in thousands, except share and per share data)

Operating expenses		$	291	$	170	$	1,034	$	1,004	$	4,441

Loss from operations			(291)		(170)		(1,034)		(1,004)		(4,441)

Other income (expense):
Interest expense			(18)		(1)		(49)		(41)		(177)
Change in value of embedded fair value
	derivative liabilities		(78)		(8)		(82)		(8)		(74)

Total other expense			(96)		(9)		(131)		(49)		(251)

Net loss		$	(387)	$	(179)	$	(1,165)	$	(1,053)	$	(4,692)
Loss per common share - basic and diluted:
	Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.01)	$	(0.00)	$	(0.02)	$	(0.03)

Weighted average shares outstanding used in
	computing net loss per share - basic and diluted	57,311,371		39,685,768		51,722,108		38,293,217

See notes to condensed financial statements

MONTAVO, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

For the Period from Inception to September 30, 2010

(Unaudited)


		Common Stock and		Deficit Accumulated	Total
		Additional Paid-in Capital		During the Development	Stockholders'
		Shares	Amount	Stage	Equity (Deficit)
		(in thousands, except share data)
Issuance of founder shares for cash, December 23, 2004		3,000,000	$ 71	$ -	$ 71
Balance December 31, 2004		3,000,000	71	-	71
Common stock issued for services in 2005		3,000,000	71	-	71
Options and warrants issued for services in 2005		-	4	-	4
Imputed interest on stockholder advances		-	1	-	1
Net loss		-	-	(197)	(197)
Balance December 31, 2005		6,000,000	147	(197)	(50)
Common stock issued for cash in 2006		59,375	2	-	2
Options and warrants issued for services in 2006		-	9	-	9
Expense related to vesting of options and warrants		-	2	-	2
Common stock issued by stockholders on behalf of Montavo for loan
	modification (accounted for as contribution of capital)	-	38	-	38
Imputed interest on stockholder advances		-	1	-	1
Net loss		-	-	(344)	(344)
Balance December 31, 2006		6,059,375	199	(541)	(342)
Common stock issued for cash in 2007		15,000	-	-	-
Options and warrants issued for services in 2007		-	1	-	1
Expense related to vesting of options and warrants		-	2	-	2
Imputed interest on stockholder advances		-	1	-	1
Net loss		-	-	(227)	(227)
Balance December 31, 2007		6,074,375	203	(768)	(565)
Common stock issued for services in 2008		2,525,000	310	-	310
Common stock issued for cash in 2008		296,625	84	-	84
Expense related to vesting of options and warrants		-	9	-	9
Common stock retained by North Coast in reverse merger		13,080,000	(264)	-	(264)
Common stock issued upon conversion of North Coast notes payable in 2008		1,398,841	250	-	250
Common stock issued upon conversion of Montavo notes payable, accrued
	interest and accounts payable in 2008	1,840,000	949	-	949
Common stock issued upon exercise of options by waiving of exercise price
	of options	1,169,000	10	-	10
Recapitalization		10,089,512	-	-	-
Imputed interest on stockholder advances		-	1	-	1
Net loss		-	-	(843)	(843)
Balance December 31, 2008		36,473,353	1,552	(1,611)	(59)
Common stock issued for cash in 2009		461,625	113	-	113
Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable due to related party
	in 2009	1,333,333	173	-	173
Common stock issued or issuable for services in 2009		2,771,906	445	-	445
Common stock issued upon conversion of note payable and related accrued
	interest	91,281	18	-	18
Common stock issued upon conversion of notes payable and
accrued interest		232,683	23	-	23
Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable		1,054,286	74	-	74
Issuance of units comprised of common stock and warrants for cash		1,000,000	25	-	25
Warrants issued for services		-	27	-	27
Options issued for services		-	485	-	485
Stockholder contribution of capital		-	5	-	5
Imputed interest on stockholder advances		-	1	-	1
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt		-	37	-	37
Net loss		-	-	(1,916)	(1,916)
Balance December 31, 2009		43,418,467	2,978	(3,527)	(549)
Common stock issued or issuable for services in the first quarter of 2010		2,431,950	83	-	83
Common stock issued or issuable for services in the second quarter of 2010		4,092,500	83	-	83
Common stock issued or issuable for services in the third quarter of 2010		2,975,833	72	-	72
Warrants issued for services		-	34	-	34
Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable and for cash		2,980,991	67	-	67
Common stock issued for cash in the first quarter of 2010, net		3,250,000	40	-	40
Common stock issued as a fee for convertible notes payable		200,000	5	-	5
Expense related to vesting of options		-	223	-	223
Net loss		-	-	(1,165)	(1,165)
Balance September 30, 2010		59,349,741	$ 3,585	$ (4,692)	$ (1,107)

See notes to condensed financial statements

MONTAVO, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


									December 23, 2004
									(Inception)
				Nine months ended September 30,					To
							2009		September 30,
				2010			(RESTATED)		2010
				(in thousands)
Operating activities:
	Net loss			$	(1,165)	$	(1,053)	$	(4,692)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
		Amortization of debt discount			33		37		59
		Imputed interest on stockholder advances			-		1		5
		Share-based payments of consulting and other expenses			495		596		1,870
		Shares issued for modification of debt terms or as fee			5		-		43
		Shares issued in excess of liabilites converted (accounted for as compensation)			-		-		85
		Excess share value issued for conversion of accounts payable-related party			-		73		73
		Change in value of embedded fair value derivative liabilities			82		8		90
		Impairment loss on patent pending and software developed for internal use			-		-		400
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities
		Prepaid expenses and other assets			64		(6)		(100)
		Accounts payable and accrued expenses			73		188		501
		Accounts payable - related party			216		(18)		607
		Accrued interest			5		2		51
			Net cash used in operating activities		(192)		(172)		(1,008)
Investing activities:
		Investment in patent			-		(8)		(45)
			Net cash used in investing activities		-		(8)		(45)
Financing activities:
		Proceeds from sale of units comprised of common stock and warrants			-		-		25
		Proceeds from sale of stock under Fuselier Holdings agreement (used to settle
			accounts payable)		58		-		58
		Stockholder contributions to capital			-		5		22
		Proceeds from issuance of notes payable			107		61		759
		Principal payments on notes payable			(13)		(1)		(121)
		Proceeds from sale of common shares			40		113		310
			Net cash provided by financing activities		192		178		1,053
		Net decrease in cash			-		(2)		-
		Cash - beginning of the period			-		2		-
		Cash - end of the period		$	-	$	-	$	-

Supplemental disclosure:
		Cash paid for income taxes		$	-	$	-	$	-

		Cash paid for interest		$	-	$	-	$	-

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
		Seller-financed software developed for internal use		$	-	$	46	$	355
		Shares retained by North Coast in reverse merger		$	-	$	-	$	264
		Shares issued to convert North Coast note payable and accrued interest		$	-	$	18	$	354
		Shares issued to convert accounts payable, accrued interest and notes payable		$	-	$	41	$	864
		Additional shares issued to Montavo stockholders in merger		$	-	$	-	$	10
		Shares issued in settlement of accounts payable		$	9	$	173	$	183
		Beneficial conversion feature - notes payable		$	-	$	37	$	37
		Convertible debt issued for accounts payable		$	20	$	-	$	57

See notes to condensed financial statements

MONTAVO, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from inception to September 30, 2010 (Unaudited)

Note 1. Business and Organization

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 20, 1994. From our incorporation and until December 13, 2004, we had no operating history other than organizational matters. On December 13, 2004, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Trans Media Inc. (“Trans Media”), a Wyoming corporation (inception occurred on December 23, 2004). The acquisition was consummated pursuant to a Plan of Arrangement and Share Exchange Agreement, dated September 29, 2004, whereby Trans Media became our wholly owned subsidiary. This transaction is commonly referred to as a “reverse acquisition”, in which all of the outstanding capital stock of Trans Media was effectively exchanged for a controlling interest in our stock. This type of transaction is considered to be a recapitalization rather than a business combination. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, no goodwill or other intangible assets were recorded.

On May 7, 2008 Trans Media, its wholly owned subsidiary North Coast Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Acquisition Corp.”), and Montavo, Inc., a privately-held Washington corporation (“Montavo”), executed an Agreement (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on August 29, 2008, Acquisition Corp. was merged with and into Montavo, with Montavo being the surviving entity as a wholly owned subsidiary, and all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Montavo was exchanged for newly-issued, restricted shares of common stock. The merger was accounted for as a reverse merger and recapitalization due to Montavo having control of the board of directors and control of management at the date of merger.

We are a development stage company in the process of deploying an advanced mobile marketing and advertising solution. We have two patents pending filed for our “method and distribution system for location based wireless presentation of electronic coupons” technology and “system and method of delivering ads”.

Note 2. Going Concern

We have prepared our condensed financial statements assuming that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of September 30, 2010, we had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of approximately $4.7 million, negative cash flows from operations since inception and expect to incur additional losses in the future as we continue to develop and grow our business. We have funded our losses primarily through sales of common stock and warrants in private placements and borrowings from related parties and other investors. The further development of our business will require capital. At September 30, 2010, we had a working capital deficit (current assets less current liabilities) of approximately $1.1 million and no cash.

We are dependent on existing cash resources and external sources of financing to meet our working capital needs. Current sources of liquidity are insufficient to provide for budgeted and anticipated working capital requirements. We will therefore be required to seek additional financing to satisfy our working capital requirements. No assurances can be given that such capital will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition to equity financing and strategic investments, we may seek additional related party loans. If we are unable to obtain any such additional financing or if such financing cannot be obtained on terms acceptable to us, we may be required to delay or scale back our operations, including the development of our mobile marketing solution, which would adversely affect our ability to generate future revenues and may force us to curtail or cease our operating activities.

To attain profitable operations, management’s plan is to execute its strategy of (i) continuing the development of our proprietary mobile marketing solution; (ii) building additional strategic partnerships with technology partners; (iii) building strategic partnerships with premier advertising inventory partners; and (iv) executing sales relationships with national and global brands in order to drive profitability. We will continue to be dependent on outside capital to fund our operations for the foreseeable future, and continue to be involved in discussions and negotiations with investors in order to raise additional funds to provide sufficient working capital for operations with a near-term goal of generating positive cash flow from operations. Any financing we obtain may further dilute or otherwise impair the ownership interest of our current stockholders. If we fail to generate positive cash flows or fail to obtain additional capital when required, we could modify, delay or abandon some or all of our plans. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Note 3. Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Basis of Preparation — The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements, including the notes thereto, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for each period presented. The results of operations for the interim periods ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2010 or for any future period.

Restatement of September 30, 2009 Financial Information

As reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2010, our management determined it was necessary to restate our unaudited interim financial statements as of September 30, 2009, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, and for the period from inception to September 30, 2009, which were included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009. Management also determined it was necessary to restate the June 30, 2009 financial statements.

Management has determined that the Second Quarter 2009 Financial Statements did not give effect to options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2009, to purchase an aggregate of 2,363,334 shares of our common stock, resulting in an approximately $306,000 understatement in operating expenses and in common stock and additional paid-in capital. In addition, the Second Quarter 2009 Financial Statements did not give effect to 145,000 shares issued or issuable to consultants for services during the three months ended June 30, 2009, valued at approximately $23,000, resulting in a related understatement of operating expenses and common stock and additional paid-in capital. Further, the Second Quarter 2009 Financial Statements did not reflect excess share value issued for conversion of accounts payable – related party of approximately $73,000, which was incorrectly recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2009 rather than the three months ended June 30, 2009. These errors had a material impact on our statements of operations and statements of stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, and for the period from inception to June 30, 2009, but had no net effect on our balance sheet (except for the deficit accumulated during the development stage and common stock and additional paid-in capital) or statements of cash flows (except for net loss and share-based payments). The accompanying Second Quarter 2009 Financial Statements have been restated to give effect to correction of these errors, which together have the effect of increasing operating expenses and loss from operations by approximately $402,000 and increasing net loss by the same amount for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and the period from inception to June 30, 2009, with an increase of $0.01 in net loss per share for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

In addition, management determined that the Third Quarter 2009 Financial Statements did not give effect to options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2009 to purchase an aggregate of approximately 138,000 shares of our common stock, resulting in an approximately $18,000 understatement in operating expenses and in common stock and additional paid-in capital. Further, the Third Quarter 2009 Financial Statements did not give effect to options previously granted during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as discussed above, of which approximately 292,000 vested during the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, resulting in an additional understatement in operating expenses and in common stock and additional paid-in capital of approximately $38,000. An additional 400,000 shares of common stock were issued pursuant to a consulting agreement for services during the three months ended September 30, 2009, which were not reflected in the Third Quarter 2009 Financial Statements. As of September 30, 2009, these services had not yet been provided, resulting in an understatement of $100,000 in prepaid expenses and other assets and common stock and additional paid-in capital. In addition, the Third Quarter 2009 Financial Statements did not give effect to 60,000 shares issued or issuable to consultants for services during the three months ended September 30, 2009 valued at approximately $3,000, resulting in a related understatement of operating expenses and common stock and additional paid-in capital. These errors, together with the errors in the Second Quarter 2009 Financial Statements discussed above, had a material impact on our statements of operations and statements of stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, and for the period from inception to September 30, 2009, but have no net effect on our balance sheet or statements of cash flows.

The accompanying Third Quarter 2009 Financial Statements have been restated to give effect to correction of these errors, which together have the effect of increasing operating expenses by approximately $12,000 and increasing net loss by the same amount for the three months ended September 30, 2009, with no impact to net loss per share, and increasing operating expenses by

approximately $391,000 and increasing net loss by the same amount for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and for the period from inception to September 30, 2009, with an increase of $0.01 in net loss per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Management intends to file our Amendment No. 1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to amend our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 originally filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 23, 2009, to correct the following items:

Part I, Item 1: Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements.

Part I, Item 2: Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Part I, Item 4T: Controls and Procedures.

as soon as is practicable. However, due to financial constraints, and due to the timing of the issuance of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are including the restated amounts in this report.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The more significant accounting estimates inherent in preparation of our financial statements include estimates for valuation of equity related instruments and valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets.

Cash — On occasion, we maintain balances in excess of federal insurance limits.

Financial Instruments and Fair Value —Our financial instruments consist of accounts payable, accrued liabilities, accounts payable - related parties, and notes payable. We consider fair value to be an exit price representing the amount that would be received upon the sale of an asset or the transfer of a liability. The fair value of financial instruments other than accounts payable - related parties, note payable to stockholder and convertible notes payable approximate the recorded value based on the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair value of note payable to stockholder and accounts payable - related parties is presently undeterminable due to the related party nature of the obligations.

We currently measure and report at fair value the embedded derivative liability for price adjustable convertible debt and warrants. The following table summarizes our financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010 (in thousands):



	Balance at September 30, 2010		Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets	Level 2 Significant other observable inputs	Level 3 Significant unobservable inputs
Liabilities:
Embedded derivative fair value liabilities	$	146	—	—	$	146

Total financial liabilities at fair value	$	146	—	—	$	146

The following table is a roll forward for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of the embedded derivative fair value liabilities, as to which fair value is determined by Level 3 inputs (in thousands):



Beginning balance at January 1, 2010	$	4
Embedded derivative fair value liabilities		60
Change in fair value included in net loss		82

Ending balance at September 30, 2010	$	146

The following table is a roll forward for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of the embedded derivative fair value liability, as to which fair value is determined by Level 3 inputs (in thousands):



Beginning balance at January 1, 2009	$	—
Issuance of convertible note with embedded derivative fair value liability		12
Change in fair value included in net loss		8


Ending balance at September 30, 2009	$	20

Embedded Derivative Liabilities — We evaluate financial instruments for freestanding or embedded derivatives. Derivative instruments that have been separated from the host contract are recorded at fair value with changes in value recognized as other income (expense) in the statements of operations in the period of change.

Income taxes — We account for income taxes using an asset and liability method which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized. The provision for income taxes represents the tax payable for the period and change during the period in net deferred tax assets and liabilities.

We have identified our federal tax return as our “major” tax jurisdiction, as defined. We do not believe any reserves for uncertain income tax positions are required. Our policy for recording interest and penalties associated with uncertain income tax positions is to record such items as a component of interest expense.

Net loss per common share —Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share excludes the effect of common stock equivalents (convertible notes, stock options and warrants) since such inclusion in the computation would be anti-dilutive. The following common stock equivalents have been excluded for all periods presented (in thousands), as of September 30:

[montavo09301010qfinalsign002.gif]

On September 8, 2009, we entered into a convertible promissory note for $20,000 at a stated interest rate of 15%. The promissory note is due within twenty-four months after date of issue, and on demand thereafter. The note is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.10 per share. Terms of the convertible note provide that the conversion price of the notes will be reduced in the event of subsequent financings at an effective price per share less than the conversion price, such that in the event we secure a future equity investment round totaling a minimum of $1,000,000 within 12 months of the date of the note, the convertible note will automatically be converted into shares of stock in the amount of 50% of the price per share of the equity investment or the maximum price of $0.10 per share, whichever is lower. The shares issuable under the note are included in the table above at the stated conversion rate of $0.10.

On May 4, 2010, we entered into a convertible promissory note for $40,000 at a stated interest rate of 12%. The note was due, on November 3, 2010, and carries a default rate of interest of 18%. The note is convertible into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price, such that the average of the lowest Trading Prices (as determined by averaging the highest closing bid and lowest closing ask prices) of the Company’s common stock as listed on the OTCBB during the five (5) trading day period ending one (1) day prior to the date the conversion notice is sent by the holder to the Company multiplied by 35%. The shares issuable under the note are excluded from the table above as the note is convertible at a variable conversion price. See Note 4.

Debt Discounts —Debt discounts are being amortized through periodic charges to interest expense over the maximum term of the related financial instrument using the effective interest method. Total amortization of debt discounts amounted to approximately $33,000, $37,000 and $63,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, 2009 and the period from inception to September 30, 2010, respectively.

Share-Based Payments—We have granted shares of our common stock and stock options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock to various parties for services and in connection with financing activities. The fair values of shares issued have been based on closing market prices for periods after October 1, 2009 and at prices of recent cash transactions for periods prior. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model as our method of valuation for share-based awards. Share-based compensation expense is

based on the value of the portion of the stock-based award that will vest during the period, adjusted for expected forfeitures. Our determination of the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected life of the award, expected stock price volatility over the term of the award (if the use of expected stock price volatility over the term of the award has a material impact on the financial statements) and historical and projected exercise behaviors. The estimation of share-based awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual or updated results differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded in the period estimates are revised. Although the fair value of share-based awards is determined in accordance with authoritative guidance, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions and other reasonable assumptions could provide differing results. Non-cash compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting periods of one to five years (deemed to be the service period), based on the fair value of such share-based awards on the grant date.

Reclassifications — Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements in order to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards—In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance (which does not have an impact on our accounting). Under the new guidance, when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best estimate of a selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The new guidance includes new disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue recognition. We adopted this authoritative guidance on January 1, 2010 and the adoption of this new guidance did not have a material effect on our financial statements.

Note 4. Notes Payable

In September 2008, we entered into a promissory note with a stockholder in the principal amount of $25,000 with a stated interest rate of 12%. Interest expense related to this note was not material in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and the period from inception to September 30, 2010.

On January 16, 2009, we entered into a convertible promissory note for $4,950 at a stated interest rate of 5% per annum. On January 16, 2009, we entered into a convertible promissory note for $5,000 at a stated interest rate of 7% per annum. On January 26, 2009, we entered into a convertible promissory note for $5,062 at a stated interest rate of 5%. In April 2009, we entered into a convertible promissory note to a related party for $3,200 at a stated interest rate of 5% per annum. The notes and related accrued interest were convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share at the option of the holder. The convertible notes when issued included a beneficial conversion feature because they allowed the holders to acquire shares of our common stock at an effective conversion price that was less than the fair value per common share at issuance. The discount on the convertible notes payable related to the beneficial conversion feature was valued at approximately $14,000, and was recognized as interest expense related to the amortization of the beneficial conversion feature during 2009. In March 2009, the first three notes discussed above were converted into 75,060 shares of common stock at a conversion rate of $0.20 per share. On April 15, 2009, we issued 16,221 shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share pursuant to the conversion of a related party promissory note with a principal balance of approximately $3,200.

On April 6, 2009, we entered into a convertible promissory note for $23,000 at a stated rate of 7% per annum. The note and related accrued interest were convertible into shares of our common stock at 0.10 per share beginning May 30, 2009. The convertible notes when issued included a beneficial conversion feature because they allowed the holders to acquire common shares of the company at an effective conversion price that was less than their fair value per common share at issuance. The discount on the convertible notes payable related to the beneficial conversion feature was valued at $23,000, and was recognized as interest expense related to the amortization of the beneficial conversion feature during 2009. In April 2009, the notes and accrued interest were converted into 232,683 shares of common stock for conversion of this debenture and accrued interest.

On September 8, 2009, we entered into a convertible promissory note for $20,000 at a stated interest rate of 15%. The promissory note is due within twenty-four months after date of issue, and on demand thereafter. The note is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.10 per share. Terms of the convertible note provided that the conversion price of the notes be reduced in the event of subsequent financings at an effective price per share less than the conversion price, such that in the event we secure a future equity investment round totaling a minimum of $1,000,000 within 12 months of the date of the note, the convertible note will automatically be converted into shares of stock in the amount of 50% of the price per share of the equity investment or the maximum price of $0.10 per share, whichever is lower. This provision expired as of September 8, 2010. In accordance with the authoritative guidance related to convertible notes with down-round protection, we recorded a fair value liability for price adjustable convertible

notes of $12,330 at issuance. The fair value liability was revalued quarterly utilizing Black-Scholes valuation model computations with the increase or decrease in fair value being reported in the statement of operations as other income (expense). At March 31, 2010, the Black-Scholes assumptions utilized were as follows: stock price of $0.03, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 3.4%, expected life of 1 year, dividend rate of 0%. At June 30, 2010, the Black-Scholes assumptions utilized were as follows: stock price of $0.015, volatility of 162%, risk-free rate of 0.42%, expected life of 0.75 year, dividend yield of 0.0%.

On March 1, 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $7,000 at a stated interest rate of 8% per annum, payable upon demand by the holder. We repaid the promissory note in May 2010.

On March 8, 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $6,000 at a stated interest rate of 8% per annum, payable upon demand by the holder. On March 8, 2010, in accordance with the terms of the promissory note, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock to the holder as loan fees. The loan was repaid in March 2010.

On April 15, 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $3,000 at a stated interest rate of 8% per annum, payable upon demand by the holder. On April 15, 2010, in accordance with the terms of the promissory note, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock to the holder as loan fees.

On May 4, 2010, we entered into a convertible promissory note for $40,000 at a stated interest rate of 12%. The note was due on November 3, 2010, and carries a default rate of interest of 18%. The note is convertible into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price, such that the average of the lowest Trading Prices (as determined by averaging the highest closing bid and lowest closing ask prices) of the Company’s common stock as listed on the OTCBB during the five (5) trading day period ending one (1) day prior to the date the conversion notice is sent by the holder to the Company multiplied by 35%. In accordance with the authoritative guidance related to convertible notes with down-round protection, we recorded a fair value liability for price adjustable convertible notes of $34,000 at issuance. The fair value liability is revalued quarterly utilizing Black-Scholes valuation model computations with the increase or decrease in fair value being reported in the statement of operations as other income (expense). At June 30, 2010, the Black-Scholes assumptions utilized were as follows: stock price of $0.015, volatility of 162%, risk-free rate of 0.22%, expected life of 0.4 year, dividend yield of 0.0%. At September 30, 2010, the Black-Scholes assumptions utilized were as follows: stock price of $0.02, volatility of 162%, risk-free rate of 0.18%, expected life of 0.1 year, dividend yield of 0.0%.

On July 28, 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $10,200 at a stated interest rate of 10% per annum, or $12,000, whichever is higher.

In August and September 2010, we entered into convertible promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $40,000 together with two-year warrants to purchase 3,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. The promissory notes bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and the notes are due in one year. Upon default, the interest rate is 18%. As the Company is currently seeking to raise financing under a private placement transaction, the promissory notes contain an optional conversion clause whereby, during a 30-day period after the completion of such private placement transaction raising in excess of $250,000, the holders may either convert the promissory note at the share price of such private placement transaction or demand repayment out of the proceeds of such financing. Under the terms of the promissory note agreement, if the share price of such private placement is below $0.02 (the strike price of the warrants), the strike price of the warrants will be downward adjusted to such share price of the private placement. In accordance with the authoritative guidance related to instruments with down-round protection, we recorded a fair value liability of $41,000 at issuance. The fair value liability is revalued quarterly utilizing Black-Scholes valuation model computations with the increase or decrease in fair value being reported in the statement of operations as other income (expense). At September 30, 2010, the Black-Scholes assumptions utilized were as follows: stock price of $0.02, volatility of 162%, risk-free rate of 0.53%, expected life of 2 years, dividend yield of 0.0%.

In August 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $1,000 at a stated interest rate of 8% per annum, payable upon demand by the holder.

In September 2010, we transferred $20,000 of accounts payable due to our CEO to a third party. These amounts were then converted into a convertible promissory note for $20,000 together with two-year warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. The promissory note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and the note is due in one year. Upon default, the interest rate is 18%. As the Company is currently seeking to raise financing under a private placement transaction, the promissory note contains an optional conversion clause whereby, during a 30-day period after the completion of such private placement transaction raising in excess of $250,000, the holder may either convert the promissory note at the share price of such private placement transaction or demand repayment out of the proceeds of such financing. Under the terms of the promissory note agreement, if the share price of such private placement is below $0.02 (the strike price of the warrants), the strike price of the warrants will be downward adjusted to such share price of the private placement. In accordance with the authoritative guidance related to instruments with down-round protection, we recorded a fair value liability of approximately $8,300 at issuance. The fair value liability is revalued quarterly utilizing Black-Scholes valuation model computations with the increase or decrease in fair

value being reported in the statement of operations as other income (expense). At September 30, 2010, the Black-Scholes assumptions utilized were as follows: stock price of $0.02, volatility of 162%, risk-free rate of 0.53%, expected life of 2 years, dividend yield of 0.0%.

Notes payable to stockholder, convertible debt and note payable consists of the following at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (amounts in thousands, except percentages):

[montavo09301010qfinalsign004.gif]

Note 5. Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Preferred Stock — On August 28, 2008, our stockholders approved an increase in the number of authorized shares of our preferred stock from 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 shares. Our board of directors has the authority, without action by the stockholders, to designate the rights, preferences and privileges of each series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of our common stock. No shares of preferred stock have been designated or issued. On May 19, 2010, a Certificate of Amendment was filed giving effect to the increase in the number of authorized preferred shares to 25,000,000.

Common Stock — Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the holders of our common stock. Subject to the rights of the holders of any class of our capital stock having any preference or priority over our common stock, the holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends that are declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in our net assets remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to prior rights of preferred stock, if any, then outstanding. Our common stock has no preemptive rights, conversion rights, redemption rights or sinking fund provisions, and there are no dividends in arrears or default. All shares of our common stock have equal distribution, liquidation and voting rights, and have no preferences or exchange rights.

On August 28, 2008, our stockholders approved an increase in the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 20,000,000 to 99,000,000. A Certificate of Amendment was filed May 19, 2010, giving effect to the increase in the number of authorized common shares to 400,000,000.

Common Stock Issuances — In January 2008, we issued 2,000,000 shares of our common stock for services. The shares were recorded at their fair value of $47,400 and the expense was recorded to general and administrative expense during the first quarter of 2008.

In August 2008, we issued an additional 47,250 shares of our common stock related to the bridge notes previously issued in fiscal 2007, valued at $1,057. In August 2008, we issued 13,080,000 shares of our common stock in relation to the Merger Agreement with North Coast.

In the nine months ending September 30, 2008, we issued 44,375 shares of our common stock in connection with the bridge notes and accounted for the issuance as stock for cash totaling $1,114. In September 2008, we converted the bridge notes, accrued interest and accounts payable totaling $864,288 into 1,670,600 shares of our common stock. We issued an additional 169,400 shares of our common stock in excess of the original agreed upon conversion price and current market prices resulting in stock based compensation expense of $84,700. In September 2008, we issued 1,169,000 shares of our common stock for upon exercise of options and warrants with an aggregate exercise price of $10,192. We waived the exercise price resulting in stock based compensation

expense of $10,192. In September 2008, we issued 525,000 shares for services. The shares were recorded at their fair value of $262,500 and the expense was recorded to general and administrative expense in the third quarter of 2008. In September 2008, $70,050 of principal and $15,628 of interest related to notes payable which we assumed in connection with the reverse merger were converted to 700,000 shares of our common stock.

On November 5, 2008, we issued 130,000 shares of our common stock at $0.40 per share for gross proceeds of $52,000. On November 28, 2008, we issued 37,500 shares of our common stock at $0.40 per share for gross proceeds of $15,000.

On December 16, 2008, we issued 37,500 shares of our common stock at $0.40 per share for gross proceeds of $15,000.

In November and December 2008, $163,549 of principal and $1,090 of interest related to notes payable which we assumed in connection with the reverse merger were converted into 698,841 shares of our common stock.

On November 28, 2008, we issued 10,089,512 shares of our common stock in connection with the recapitalization.

In February 2009, we issued an aggregate of 22,000 shares of our common stock to consultants for advisory services. The shares were recorded at their fair value of $11,453 and the expense was recorded to operating expenses during the first quarter of 2009. In addition, in February 2009, we issued 25,000 shares of our common stock to a consultant for services. The shares were recorded at their fair value of $12,000 and the expense was recorded to operating expenses during the first quarter of 2009. On February 12, 2009, we issued 45,000 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.40 per share for gross proceeds of $18,000.

In March 2009, we issued 335,000 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.20 per share for gross proceeds of $67,000. In March 2009, we issued 54,800 shares of our common stock for advisory services. The shares were recorded at their fair value of $20,782 and the expense was recorded to general and administrative expense during the first quarter of 2009. On March 25, 2009, we issued 75,060 shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share pursuant to the conversion of three promissory notes having an aggregate principal balance of $15,012 (See Note 4).

In April 2009, we issued 325,000 shares of our common stock to Wakabayashi Fund LLC for investor relations services. The shares were recorded at a fair value of $81,250 based on the price of our common stock in recent stock sales and the expense was recorded to operating expenses during the second quarter of 2009. In addition, pursuant to the consulting agreement dated April 1, 2009, we were to issue 162,500 shares of our common stock monthly for a period of four months on a performance-basis, and at management’s discretion, an additional 200,000 common shares may be issued as an incentive bonus. As of September 30, 2010, no additional shares of our common stock are issuable relating to this consulting agreement.

In April 2009, we issued 145,000 shares of our common stock for services. The shares were recorded at a fair value of $29,000 based on the price of our common stock in recent stock sales and the expense was recorded to operating expenses during the second quarter of 2009. On April 3, 2009, we issued 16,000 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.20 per share for gross proceeds of $3,200. On April 24, 2009, we issued 50,000 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.40 per share for gross proceeds of $20,000. On April 15, 2009, we issued 16,221 shares of our common stock at $0.20 per share pursuant to the conversion of a related party promissory note with a principal balance of approximately $3,200 and in April 2009, we issued an additional 232,683 shares of our common stock pursuant to the conversion of a convertible promissory note and related accrued interest in the aggregate amount of $23,268 (See Note 4).

On May 19, 2009, we issued 1,333,333 shares of our common stock to a related party vendor for reduction of accounts payable of $100,000. The shares when issued had an estimated fair value of approximately $173,300 based on the closing market prices on the issue dates, and as a result, we recorded additional expense of approximately $73,300 in the second quarter 2009.

On June 16, 2009, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock for legal services. The shares were recorded at a fair value of $26,000 based on the price of our common stock in recent stock sales and the expense was recorded to operating expenses during the second quarter of 2009. On June 23, 2009, we issued 15,625 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.32 per share for gross proceeds of $5,000.

In April 2009, we entered into a six-month software development services contract with Perfect Pixels Media Group, pursuant to which we agreed to issue shares of our common stock at an agreed upon rate of $0.50 per share for services to be provided under the agreement. In the fourth quarter of 2009, 40,000 shares of our common stock were issuable under the terms of the agreement, which has terminated in accordance with its terms, for software development services valued at $20,000.

On October 1, 2009, we entered into a six-month business development services contract with Openbridge, pursuant to which we issued 650,000 shares of our common stock for services to be provided under the agreement. The shares were recorded at their fair value of $65,000 based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of issuance, and during the fourth quarter of

2009, we recognized $32,500 in operating expenses related to these shares, and the remaining $32,500 was recorded in operating expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2010. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, an additional 650,000 shares were issued in April 2010 to be earned in equal monthly installments over the next six-month term of the agreement, plus an additional 200,000 shares as a bonus for performance under the contract. We recorded the 650,000 shares at their fair value of $10,725 based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of issuance and during the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded $5,400 in operating expenses related to these shares. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded an additional $5,400 in operating expenses related to these shares. The 200,000 shares were fully vested on the date of issuance and we recorded $3,300 in operating expenses based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of issuance.

On October 9, 2009, we issued 1,000,000 units at $0.025 per unit for gross proceeds of $25,000, with each unit comprised of one share of our common stock and a two-year warrant to purchase two shares of our common stock at $0.10 per share. The warrants were immediately exercisable. We evaluated the warrants and determined that the warrants do not contain any provisions equivalent to net-cash settlement provisions, and accordingly are accounted for as equity. The relative fair value of the common stock was determined to be $10,000 and the relative fair value of the warrants was determined to be $15,000 based on the relative fair value allocation of the proceeds received.

In November 2009, we issued 340,000 shares of our common stock to vendors in settlement of accounts payable in the aggregate amount of $46,000.

In 2009, we issued 5,000 shares of our common stock to a consultant for recruiting services provided. The fair value of the shares of $1,000 was recorded to operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2009. An additional 20,000 shares are issuable to the consultant for future services pursuant to the terms of the contract, none of which were issuable as of September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.

In 2009, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock to a consultant for consulting services provided. The fair value of the shares of $20,000 was recorded to operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2009. An additional 100,000 shares are issuable to the consultant for future services pursuant to the terms of the contract, none of which were issuable as of September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.

In 2009, 190,000 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to consultants for services provided. The aggregate fair value of the shares of $9,500 based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2009 was recorded to operating expenses in 2009.

In 2009, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock for future software development services valued at $100,000 based on the closing market price on the date of issuance of the shares, pursuant to a three-year contract with Treemo, Inc. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, none of the software development services had been utilized, and accordingly these costs are recorded as prepaid expenses in our balance sheet as of those dates.

On December 4, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Fuselier Holdings I, Inc. (“Fuselier Holdings”). Under the terms of the agreement, Fuselier Holdings will negotiate with vendors on our behalf and settle certain accounts payable in exchange for shares of our common stock. We receive cash under the terms of the agreement from Fuselier Holdings, and such cash is used to settle certain accounts payable at our discretion. Fuselier Holdings is authorized under the agreement to settle accounts payable in incremental amounts up to $25,000, and negotiate settlement in shares of our common stock at a per share price determined by averaging the closing price of the previous three (3) full trading days as reported on the over-the-counter bulletin board (“OTCBB”) commencing on the day immediately preceding the day on which our stock is deemed to be freely tradable upon delivery to Fuselier Holdings, or a mutually agreed upon price (“Per Share Price Calculation”). On December 4, 2009, we also entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Jean Fuselier Sr., whereby we will issue shares of our common stock to Dr. Fuselier equal to the amount of the accounts payable settled, at a per share price determined in accordance with the Per Share Price Calculation. In connection with these agreements, in December 2009, 382,848 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to Dr. Fuselier for services, and 714,286 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to Fuselier Holdings in settlement of accounts payable of $25,000. In connection with the drafting of these agreements, we issued an additional 232,258 shares of our common stock to Dr. Fuselier for legal services in October 2009. The fair value of the shares of $24,000 based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of issuance was recorded to operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2009. In January 2010, 654,450 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to Dr. Fuselier for services valued at $25,000 under the contract as previously discussed above, and 797,658 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to Fuselier Holdings in settlement of accounts payable totaling $25,000. In February 2010, 1,250,000 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to Dr. Fuselier for services valued at $25,000 under the contract as previously discussed above, and 1,250,000 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to Fuselier Holdings in settlement of accounts payable totaling $25,000.

In April 2010, we amended our agreement with Fuselier Holdings, such that if our common stock closed at prices below $0.03 per share at three mutually agreed upon intervals during April 2010, we would issue shares of our common stock to Fuselier Holdings at a per share price of $0.02 rather than the price determined in accordance with the Per Share Price Calculation. In addition, we agreed that, for a period of 180 days after the date of issuance, should Fuselier Holdings sell the stock and be unable to receive net proceeds equal to $8,000, at our option, we will either issue additional shares to Fuselier Holdings or pay cash such that the amount received by Fuselier Holdings is equal to $8,000. In April 2010, we also amended our consulting agreement with Dr. Jean Fuselier, previously described above, such that our common stock closed at prices below $0.03 per share at three mutually agreed upon intervals during April 2010, we would issue shares of our common stock to Dr. Jean Fuselier equal to the amount of the accounts payable settled, at a per share price of $0.02 rather than the price determined in accordance with the Per Share Calculation. In addition, we agreed that, for a period of 180 days after the date of issuance, should Dr. Fuselier sell the stock and be unable to receive net proceeds equal to $8,000, at our option, we will either issue additional shares to Dr. Jean Fuselier or pay cash such that the amount received by Dr. Fuselier is equal to $8,000. The amendments to the Fuselier Holdings agreement and the Dr. Jean Fuselier consulting agreement were only applicable to the April 2010 settlement of $8,000 in accounts payable and not to future or past Fuselier Holdings or Dr. Jean Fuselier consulting agreement transactions. In April 2010, 400,000 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to Dr. Fuselier for services valued at $8,000 under the amended contract, and 400,000 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to Fuselier Holdings in settlement of accounts payable totaling $8,000. As a result of the April 2010 amendment, in June 2010 we issued an additional 400,000 shares of our common stock to Fuselier Holdings and in June 2010 we issued an additional 400,000 shares of our common stock to Dr. Jean Fuselier. There is no further obligation to issue shares under this agreement.

In January 2010, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock for $20,000 in legal services. In February 2010, we issued 133,333 shares of our common stock for approximately $9,000 of legal services to settle accounts payable.

In February 2010, we entered into a one-year agreement with Moxie Ventures, Inc. for business development services. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we will issue Moxie Ventures, Inc. $5,000 in shares of our common stock on a monthly basis, as determined by dividing $5,000 by the closing price of our common stock as of the first five trading days of each month, up to a maximum of 20,000 shares per month. In addition, under the terms of the agreement, we will pay them certain cash success fees upon capital raising activities. In the first quarter of 2010, 40,000 shares of our common stock were issuable under the agreement, and we recorded $10,000 in related operating expense. In the second quarter of 2010, 60,000 shares of our common stock were issuable under the agreement and we recorded $15,000 in related operating expense. In the third quarter of 2010, an additional 60,000 shares of our common stock were issuable under the terms of the agreement and we recorded $15,000 in operating expense.

In March 2010, in connection with the promissory note transaction described in Note 4, we also entered into an advisory services agreement with the noteholder, pursuant to which we will issue him 150,000 shares of our common stock over a period of 12 months for services rendered under the agreement. In the first quarter of 2010, 12,500 shares were issued or issuable under the terms of the agreement and accordingly we recorded expense of $375 during the three months ended March 31, 2010 related to the value of the shares based on the closing price of our common stock on March 31, 2010. In the second quarter of 2010, 37,500 shares were issued or issuable under the terms of the agreement and accordingly we recorded expense of approximately $570 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, related to the value of the shares based on the closing price of our common stock on June 30, 2010. In the third quarter of 2010, 37,500 shares were issued or issuable under the terms of the agreement and accordingly we recorded expense of approximately $900 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, related to the value of the shares based on the closing price of our common stock on September 30, 2010.

In the first quarter of 2010, 75,000 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to consultants for services provided. The aggregate fair value of the shares of approximately $2,000 based on the closing price of our common stock on March 31, 2010 was recorded to operating expenses in the first quarter of 2010. In the second quarter of 2010, 45,000 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to consultants for services provided. The aggregate fair value of the shares of approximately $675 based on the closing price of our common stock on June 30, 2010 was recorded to operating expenses in the second quarter of 2010. In September 2010, we entered into a one-year agreement with a consultant for services. Pursuant to the term of the agreement, we will issue the consultant 40,000 shares of our common stock on a monthly basis. In the third quarter of 2010, 70,000 shares of our common stock were issued or issuable to a consultant for services provided. The aggregate fair value of the shares of approximately $1,700 based on the closing price of our common stock on September 30, 2010 was recorded to operating expenses in the third quarter of 2010.

In March 2010, we entered into an agreement with a consultant for capital raising services. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued the consultant 150,000 shares of our common stock upon signing. An additional 650,000 shares are issuable on a performance basis pursuant to the terms of the contract. In any event, if the consultant secures financing for the Company of $1,000,000 or more, all 800,000 shares become immediately earned and issuable. The consultant is also entitled to a 10% cash fee and 5% warrant coverage on qualified financings, such warrants to be two-year warrants with exercise price at 10% above the price of the qualified financing and be provided piggyback registration rights.

On March 19, 2010, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.01 per share for gross proceeds of $10,000. On March 22, 2010, we issued 500,000 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.01 per share for gross proceeds of $5,000. On March 25, 2010, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.01 per share for gross proceeds of $10,000. On March 29, 2010, we issued 600,000 shares of our common stock for cash at $0.025 per share for gross proceeds of $15,000.

In April 2010, we entered into a nine-month agreement with a consultant for investor relations services. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we issued the consultant 300,000 shares of our common stock upon signing of the agreement. The aggregate fair value of the shares of approximately $12,000 based on the closing price of our common stock was recorded to operating expenses in the second quarter of 2010. Under the terms of the agreement, an additional 200,000 shares of the agreement are issuable to the consultant for future services pursuant to the terms of the contract, none of which were issuable as of September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.

In the second quarter of 2010, we entered into a consulting agreement with a company for advisory services. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock to the consultant for prior services. The fair value of the shares of approximately $16,000 based on the closing price of our common stock on April 28, 2010 was recorded to operating expenses in the second quarter of 2010.

In the second quarter of 2010, we entered into a consulting agreement with an individual for advisory services. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock to the consultant for prior services. The fair value of the shares of approximately $16,000 based on the closing price of our common stock on April 28, 2010 was recorded to operating expenses in the second quarter of 2010.

In July 2010, we entered into a six-month consulting agreement for business advisory services, pursuant to which we will issue the consultant 100,000 shares of our common stock per month. As of September 30, 2010, 300,000 shares of our common stock were issuable. The aggregate fair value of the shares of approximately $7,000 based on the closing price of our common stock on September 30, 2010 was recorded to operating expenses in the third quarter of 2010.

In July 2010, we entered into an advisory services agreement with a consulting firm, pursuant to which we issued 2,000,000 shares of our common stock valued at $30,000 for services.

On August 6, 2010, we issued 133,333 shares of our common stock to a vendor in payment of finance charges.

Stock Incentive Plans — In May 2009, our board of directors approved the 2009 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). Under the 2009 Plan, up to 6,000,000 shares of our common stock may be issued to directors, employees or consultants pursuant to share awards or options to purchase our common stock. We filed a Form S-8 on June 12, 2009 to register the shares of common stock issuable under the 2009 Plan. On February 11, 2010, we amended our 2009 Plan and filed a revised Form S-8 increasing the number of reserved shares to 15,000,000. On May 7, 2010, we again amended our 2009 Plan and filed a subsequent revision to the Form S-8, increasing the number of reserved shares to 35,000,000.

Employee Stock Options — Stock options to purchase shares of our common stock are granted under our 2009 Plan to certain employees and consultants, at prices at or above the fair market value on the date of grant.

Non-cash compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting periods of one to five years, based on the fair value on the grant date. The vesting period is deemed to be the requisite service period. Certain option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the 2009 Plan and certain employment agreements we have with key officers).

The fair value of stock-based option awards was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions for the periods presented as follows:



	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Expected dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%
Risk free interest rate		1.27	%		2.02	%		1.98	%		3.22	%
Expected stock volatility		162	%		162	%		162	%		162	%
Expected option life		5.8 years			3.0 years			5.7 years			5.4 years


Fair value of options granted	$	0.02			$	0.12		$	0.02			$	0.25

Option activity was as follows during the nine months ended September 30, 2010:



	Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	*(in thousands)*				*(in thousands)*
Outstanding December 31, 2009	11,483	$	0.07
Options granted	2,831		0.002
Options exercised	—		—
Options expired	—		—
Options forfeited	—		—
Options cancelled	—		—

Outstanding at September 30, 2010	14,314	$	0.004	9.0 years	$	315

Exercisable at September 30, 2010	9,434	$	0.005	8.9 years	$	204

As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately $243,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures. We expect to recognize this cost over a weighted average period of approximately three and a quarter years.

The intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2010 is based on the $0.02 closing market price of our common stock on that date, and is calculated by aggregating the difference between $0.02 and the exercise price of each of the outstanding vested and unvested stock options which have an exercise price less than $0.02. The total fair value of options that vested during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, net of forfeitures, was approximately $57,000 and $56,000 respectively. The total fair value of options that vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, net of forfeitures, was approximately $223,000 and $362,600, respectively.

Non-Employee Stock Option Grants — In March, June and September 2010, we granted options under our 2009 Plan to purchase 691,360, 739,729 and 1,345,000 shares, respectively, of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 pursuant to our CEO’s employment contract. As the options were fully vested on the date of grant as described in Note 6, we recognized immediate expense of approximately $21,000, $11,000 and $32,000, respectively, related to the fair value of the options. The options have a 10-year term.

In January 2010, we issued options, pursuant to terms of a consulting agreement for software design services, to a consultant to purchase 55,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share, of which options 10,000 vested immediately and the remainder vest in equal monthly installments of 5,000 options through September 2010 pursuant to the terms of the software design services contract.

In June 2009, we issued options under our 2009 Plan to purchase 160,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.13 per share to a consultant engaged in providing strategic advisory services to our company, of which options 30,000 were vested as of June 30, 2009. The remaining options were forfeited by the consultant due to his termination. The options are exercisable until December 31, 2010. During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded expense of approximately $3,800 related to the fair value of the options, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.13 (based on closing price on date of grant), volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 0.56%, expected term of 1.5 years, dividend yield of 0.0%.

In June 2009, we issued options under our 2009 Plan to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 to our former Chief Development Officer, who is engaged in software development. The options vested as follows: 1/3 vested immediately, and the remainder vested monthly over two years beginning June 1, 2008. Through September 30, 2009, we recorded expense of approximately $97,300 related to the fair value of the options, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.13, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 3.40%, expected term of 5.75 years, dividend yield of 0.0%. The options expire on May 15, 2019.

In June 2009, we issued options under our 2009 Plan to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 to Armada Capital, who is engaged in providing advisory services to the Company. The options vested as follows: 1/3 vested immediately, and the remainder vested monthly over two years beginning June 1, 2008. Through September 30, 2009, we recorded expense of approximately $97,300 related to the fair value of the options, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.13, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 3.40%, expected term of 5.75 years, dividend yield of 0.0%. The options expire on May 15, 2019.

In June 2009, we issued options under our 2009 Plan to purchase 1,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 to Brook Lang, who was engaged in providing management services to the Company and is now the Company’s CEO. The options vested as follows: 1/3 vested immediately, and the remainder vested monthly over two years beginning June 1, 2008. Through September 30, 2009, we recorded expense of approximately $146,250 related to the fair value of the options, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.13, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 3.40%, expected term of 5.75 years, dividend yield of 0.0%. The options expire on May 15, 2019.

In August 2009, we issued options under our 2009 Plan to purchase 83,333 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share to a consultant engaged in providing strategic advisory services to our company, which options vest according to performance under the terms of the consulting agreement. As the options were immediately vested on the date of grant, we recorded expense of approximately $12,500 during the third quarter of 2009 related to the fair value of the options, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.15, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 1.78%, expected term of three years, dividend yield of 0.0%. The options expire on August 15, 2014.

In August 2009, we issued options under our 2009 Plan to purchase 60,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share to a consultant engaged in providing strategic advisory services to our company, of which options 20,000 vested immediately and the remainder vest in equal monthly installments of 5,000 options through August 2010 pursuant to the terms of the advisory services contract. During the third quarter of 2009, we recorded expense of approximately $500 related to the fair value of the options, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.11, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 1.78%, expected term of three years, dividend yield of 0.0%. The options expire on August 10, 2014.

Warrants — On January 26, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Newport Capital for broker relations services. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 and a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00, exercisable for two years. The warrants vested immediately. The warrants were recorded as expense in 2009 at their fair value of approximately $26,800, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.20 (based on recent stock sales), volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 0.47%, expected term of two years, dividend yield of 0.0%. We evaluated the warrants and determined that the warrants do not contain any provisions equivalent to net-cash settlement provisions, and accordingly are accounted for as equity.

As noted above, on October 9, 2009, we issued 1,000,000 units at $0.025 per unit for gross proceeds of $25,000, with each unit comprised of one share of our common stock and a two-year warrant to purchase two shares (2,000,000 total) of our common stock at $0.10 per share. The warrants were immediately exercisable. We evaluated the warrants and determined that the warrants do not contain any provisions equivalent to net-cash settlement provisions, and accordingly are accounted for as equity.

On May 10, 2010, we entered into an agreement with a consultant for financial and business advisory services. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued a five-year fully-vested warrant to purchase up to 200,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 and on May 31, 2010, we issued a five-year fully vested warrant to purchase up to 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price to the consultant for services rendered under the agreement. The warrants were recorded as expense in the second quarter of 2010 at their fair value of approximately $3,000, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.01, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 2.26%, expected term of 5 years, dividend yield of 0.0%. We evaluated the warrants and determined that the warrants do not contain any provisions equivalent to net-cash settlement provisions, and accordingly are accounted for as equity. Additional warrants were granted during July and August 2010 to this consultant pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement. During July 2010, we issued five-year warrants to purchase an additional 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share for financial and advisory services to the same consultant. The warrants were recorded as expense in the third quarter of 2010 at their fair value of approximately $6,000, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.01, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 2.26%, expected term of 5 years, dividend yield of 0.0%. We evaluated the warrants and determined that the warrants do not contain any provisions equivalent to net-cash settlement provisions, and accordingly are accounted for as equity.

On August 2, 2010, the consulting agreement was amended to provide for the issuance to the consultant of 20% of any shares or warrants issued under an August 2010 agreement with a public relations and marketing consulting firm. Accordingly, in August 2010, we issued two-year warrants to purchase an additional 220,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share to

the consultant under the terms of the consulting agreement, as amended and two-year warrants to purchase an additional 140,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share under the terms of the consulting agreement, as amended (see below). The warrants were recorded as expense in the third quarter of 2010 at their fair value of approximately $4,000, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.01, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 0.56%, expected term of 2 years, dividend yield of 0.0%. We evaluated the warrants and determined that the warrants do not contain any provisions equivalent to net-cash settlement provisions, and accordingly are accounted for as equity.

Under a success-based arrangement discussed below, two-year warrants to purchase an additional 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share and two year warrants to purchase an additional 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share are also potentially issuable to the consultant.

In August 2010, we entered into an annual contract with a public relations and marketing consulting firm for services. Under the terms of the contract, we issued two-year warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 to the consulting firm for services. In addition, we are required to make monthly cash payments of $10,000, with the first two months’ cash payments deferred for two months. In August 2010, we issued two-year warrants to purchase 700,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share for public relations and marketing services to the same public relations and marketing consulting firm. In addition, in August 2010, we issued additional two-year warrants to purchase 700,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 to the same consulting firm for services under the agreement. The warrants were recorded as expense in the third quarter of 2010 at their fair value of approximately $21,000, which was determined using the Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: stock price of $0.01, volatility of 162%, risk free rate of 0.53%, expected term of 2 years, dividend yield of 0.0%. We evaluated the warrants and determined that the warrants do not contain any provisions equivalent to net-cash settlement provisions, and accordingly are accounted for as equity.

In addition, we agreed to a success-fee arrangement with the public relations and marketing consulting firm, under which if certain performance criteria met, two-year warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share and two-year warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share are potentially issuable to the consulting firm as a success fee.

As discussed in Note 4, in August and September 2010, we entered into convertible promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $60,000 together with two-year warrants to purchase 4,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. The promissory notes bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and the notes are due in one year. Upon default, the interest rate is 18%. As the Company is currently seeking to raise financing under a private placement transaction, the promissory notes contain an optional conversion clause whereby, during a 30-day period after the completion of such private placement transaction raising in excess of $250,000, the holders may either convert the promissory note at the share price of such private placement transaction or demand repayment out of the proceeds of such financing. Under the terms of the promissory note agreement, if the share price of such private placement is below $0.02 (the strike price of the warrants), the strike price of the warrants will be downward adjusted to such share price of the private placement. In accordance with the authoritative guidance related to instruments with down-round protection, we recorded a fair value liability of approximately $49,300 at issuance. The fair value liability is revalued quarterly utilizing Black-Scholes valuation model computations with the increase or decrease in fair value being reported in the statement of operations as other income (expense). At September 30, 2010, the Black-Scholes assumptions utilized were as follows: stock price of $0.02, volatility of 162%, risk-free rate of 0.53%, expected life of 2 years, dividend yield of 0.0%.

The following summarizes warrant activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (in thousands):



Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2009		2,200
Warrants issued		7,460
Warrants exercised		—
Warrants expired		—

Warrants outstanding, September 30, 2010		9,660

Weighted average exercise price, September 30, 2010	$	0.05

Note 6. Related Party Transactions

In June 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with our CEO, pursuant to which, among other things, the CEO will be entitled to annual base compensation at up to $196,000, an annual bonus of up to 50% of base compensation (with actual amount to be determined by our board of directors) and a grant of options to purchase 7,500,000 shares of our common stock. The options vest in 1/60 monthly installments beginning January 1, 2009, over a period of five years. Pursuant to the employment contract, we are also

required to issue the CEO additional options to purchase shares of our common stock over a three-year period to maintain the executive’s percentage ownership in our common stock on a fully diluted basis at 10% of the Company. As a result of this provision, as previously discussed at Note 5, options to purchase 691,360, 739,729 and 1,345,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 were granted pursuant to our CEO’s employment contract as of March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The options were fully vested on the date of grant.

Prior to his employment agreement, we recorded management fees totaling $219,923 to the CEO for his services rendered during the year ended December 31, 2008. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately $448,000 and $302,000, which represented amounts due to our CEO, were included in accounts payable - related parties on the accompanying balance sheet.

As discussed in Note 5, on June 15, 2009, we issued options under the 2009 Plan to purchase 1,500,000 shares of our common stock to our CEO outside of his employment agreement. Options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock were immediately vested as of the date of grant. The remainder vests in monthly installments of 41,667 through June 2010. The options have a term of ten years. On December 31, 2009, we issued options under the 2009 Plan to purchase 7,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share to our CEO pursuant to his employment agreement. The options vest in 1/60 monthly installments beginning January 1, 2009, over a period of five years. The options have a term of ten years.

As discussed in Note 5, above, on May 19, 2009, we issued 1,333,333 shares of our common stock to our former Chief Development Officer (“CDO”) for reduction of accounts payable of $100,000. The shares when issued had an estimated fair value of approximately $173,300 based on the closing market prices on the issue dates, and as a result, we recorded additional expense of approximately $73,300 in the second quarter of 2009. As discussed in Note 5, above, in June 2009, we issued options under our 2009 Plan to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 to our former CDO, who is engaged in software development. The options vested as follows: 1/3 vested immediately, and the remainder vested monthly over two years beginning June 1, 2008. The options expire on May 15, 2019. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately $114,000 and $42,000, which represented amounts due to a company owned by our former CDO, were included in accounts payable – related parties on the accompanying balance sheet.

In September 2008, we entered into a promissory note with a stockholder in the principal amount of $25,000 with a stated interest rate of 12%.

As further discussed in Note 4, in September 2010, we transferred $20,000 of accounts payable due to our CEO to a third party. These amounts were then converted into a convertible promissory note for $20,000 together with two-year warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. The promissory notes bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and the notes are due in one year. Upon default, the interest rate is 18%. As the Company is currently seeking to raise financing under a private placement transaction, the promissory notes contain an optional conversion clause whereby, during a 30-day period after the completion of such private placement transaction raising in excess of $250,000, the holders may either convert the promissory note at the share price of such private placement transaction or demand repayment out of the proceeds of such financing. Under the terms of the promissory note agreement, if the share price of such private placement is below $0.02 (the strike price of the warrants), the strike price of the warrants will be downward adjusted to such share price of the private placement.

We are provided office space in Seattle, Washington at no cost by our former Chief Development Officer on a month-to-month basis.

Note 7. Income Taxes

We continue to record a valuation allowance in the full amount of deferred tax assets since realization of such tax benefits has not been determined by our management to be more likely than not. At the end of each interim period, we make our best estimate of the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year, and the rate so determined is used in providing for income taxes on a current year-to-date basis. The difference between the expected provision or benefit computed using the statutory tax rate and the recorded provision or benefit of zero, is primarily due to the estimated change in valuation allowance more likely to result due to taxable losses anticipated for the applicable fiscal year.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

Acxiom Corporation — In February 2010, we entered into a database license agreement with Acxiom Corporation under which we will license their InfoBase-X telephone directories commencing February 5, 2010 for an initial term of six months (“Initial Term”). Unless terminated, the license term automatically extends to a period of one year (“First One Year Term”), and will continue to automatically renew for successive one-year terms (“Renewal Term”) unless terminated by either party upon 30 days notice or for

cause as defined in the agreement. In consideration of the license grant, we will pay no fees for the Initial Term, and will pay annual minimum fees of $30,000 for the First One Year Term and any Renewal Term, payable monthly at a rate of $2,500 per month, plus certain additional per-click volume-based fees, based upon the following schedule:

[montavo09301010qfinalsign006.gif]

infoUSA, Inc. — In April 2009, we entered into a three-year database license agreement with infoUSA, Inc. under which we licensed their Yellow Pages database commencing April 15, 2009. In consideration of the license grant, we will pay the greater of royalties calculated at $0.15 per user per month or calculated based on transaction volume, or annual minimum license fees of $100,000 for the first year and $125,000 for the second year of the agreement and thereafter. The agreement automatically renews for an additional two year term unless terminated upon 60-day notice by either party. Minimum fees under this agreement totaled $67,000 through December 31, 2009. The remaining first year fees of $33,000 were due as of March 31, 2010. We terminated this agreement effective January 19, 2010 and our remaining liability with infoUSA, Inc. is $75,000 as of September 30, 2010.

Robert Half International —In August 2009, Robert Half International sued us claiming unpaid fees for services rendered. On February 24, 2010, a judgment was granted against us in the amount of $87,248.91, which amount bears interest at 12% per annum. We have included the judgment, net of payment of approximately $15,000, in accounts payable at September 30, 2010 and at approximately $87,000 at December 31, 2009. On June 24, 2010, we entered into a settlement and forbearance agreement with Robert Half International, whereby Robert Half International agreed not to pursue the judgment against us as long as we continued to make payments as follows: on August 1, 2010, $10,000.00; and $10,000 thereafter on the first day of every month until the amount of $74,000 is paid in full. We have not made the payments as indicated under the terms of the settlement and forbearance agreement and as a result, there is no assurance that Robert Half International will not pursue judgment against us.

Moody Capital – In April 2010, we entered into an agreement with Moody Capital for investment banking services. Under the agreement, Moody Capital will receive upon the placement of debt or equity, an 8% cash fee and 5% warrant coverage with an exercise price equal to 1.05 times the offering price of the equity transaction. We may terminate this agreement within 30 days upon giving written notice.

Note 9. Subsequent Events

In October 2010, we transferred $25,000 of accounts payable due to our CEO to a third party. These amounts were then converted into a convertible promissory note for $25,000 at a stated interest rate of 15%. The promissory note is due within twenty-four months after date of issue, and on demand thereafter. The note is convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.10 per share. Terms of the convertible note provide that the conversion price of the notes will be reduced in the event of subsequent financings at an effective price per share less than the conversion price, such that in the event we secure a future equity investment round totaling a minimum of $1,000,000 within 12 months of the date of the note, the convertible note will automatically be converted into shares of stock in the amount of 50% of the price per share of the equity investment or the maximum price of $0.10 per share, whichever is lower.

In October and December 2010, we entered into convertible promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $32,500 together with two-year warrants to purchase 2,437,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. The promissory notes bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and the notes are due in one year. Upon default, the interest rate is 18%. As the Company is currently seeking to raise financing under a private placement transaction, the promissory notes contain an optional conversion clause whereby, during a 30-day period after the completion of such private placement transaction raising in excess of $250,000, the holders may either convert the promissory note at the share price of such private placement transaction or demand repayment out of the proceeds of such financing. Under the terms of the promissory note agreement, if the share price of such private placement is below $0.02 (the strike price of the warrants), the strike price of the warrants will be downward adjusted to such share price of the private placement.

In October 2010, we entered into advisory services agreements with two consultants whereby we agreed to issue an aggregate of 11,250,000 shares of our common stock for services over the one-year term of the agreements.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements contained herein may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, an amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events or our financial performance, and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those identified below, which may cause our or our industry’s actual or future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements or from historical results. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following factors, among others, could cause our or our industry’s future results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated: (1) the availability of additional funds to enable us to successfully pursue our business plan; (2) the uncertainties related to the appeal and acceptance of our planned products and service offerings; (3) the success or failure of our development of additional products and services; (4) our ability to maintain, attract and integrate management personnel; (5) our ability to secure suitable advertising inventory partners; (6) our ability to effectively market and sell our services to new customers; (7) changes in the rules and regulations governing our business; (8) the intensity of competition; and (9) general economic conditions. As a result of these and other factors, we may experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly or annual basis, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and stock price. As a result of these and other factors, we may experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly or annual basis, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and stock price. Additional factors that would cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or suggested in any forward-looking statements are contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those factors discussed under the caption “Forward-Looking Information” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as may be supplemented or amended from time to time, which we urge investors to consider. We have no duty to update, supplement or revise any forward-looking statements after the date of this report or to conform them to actual results, new information, future events or otherwise. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our condensed financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this Report.

We are deploying an advanced mobile marketing and advertising solution. The Montavo Mobile Ad Platform (mMAP™) offers advertisers the unique opportunity to review a “mobile ad spend vs. gross profit” ratio which generates a Return on Investment (“ROI”) of their mobile advertising costs. The ratio is displayed on the Montavo Mobile Ad Spend Speedometer™, which is a real-time online dashboard reporting tool that allows advertisers to monitor the performance of mobile advertising campaigns that are deployed on the mMAP™.

The mMAP™, with our patent pending technology, can anonymously report to an advertiser that a consumer who merely viewed a mobile ad on their cell phone (through any of several different ways the mMAP™ places advertising on the mobile phone in both push and pull-type ads), subsequently went into a physical location store and purchased products and/or services. This means Montavo can give an advertiser an ROI measure on their mobile advertising costs related to in-store purchases, representing a benefit that is not offered by traditional advertising mediums today. The mMAP™ does this without any additional hardware or software or Point of Sale (“POS”) system, and no additional interaction is needed between store associates and consumers or their mobile phones.

We expect that our core revenues will be derived from advertisers, who will be charged impression views and/or monthly fees for inclusion in our permission-based database, from impressions, click-through and redemption fees for the redemption of incentives, or from fees for the development of national campaigns for brand advertisers. We plan to seek distribution agreements with advertisement campaign aggregators, including global advertising agencies, search-engine marketing optimization agencies, membership organizations and direct marketing organizations. We also intend to employ a small team of account executives that will act as a sales force and seek and solicit clients among national and regional brand leaders. There can be no assurance that we will achieve our objectives or succeed in our business plan.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern

We have prepared our condensed financial statements assuming that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of September 30, 2010, we had a deficit accumulated in the development stage of approximately $4.7 million, negative cash flows from operations since inception and expect to incur additional losses in the future as we continue to develop and grow our business. We have funded our losses primarily through sales of common stock and warrants in private placements and borrowings from related parties and other investors. The further development of our business will require capital. At September 30, 2010, we had a working capital deficit (current assets less current liabilities) of $1.1 million and no cash. Our operating expenses will consume a material amount of our cash resources.

We are still in the early stages of executing our business strategy. Our current cash levels are not sufficient to enable us to execute our business strategy. We require additional financing to execute our business strategy and to satisfy our near-term working capital requirements. In the event that we cannot obtain additional funds, on a timely basis or our operations do not generate sufficient cash flow, we may be forced to curtail or cease our activities, which would likely result in the loss to investors of all or a substantial portion of their investment. We are actively seeking to raise additional capital through the sale of shares of our capital stock to institutional investors and through strategic investments. If management deems necessary, we might also seek additional loans from related parties. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to consummate any of these transactions, or that these transactions will be consummated on a timely basis or on terms favorable to us.

Discussion of Cash Flows

We used cash of approximately $192,000, $172,000 and $1,008,000 in our operating activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and the period from inception to September 30, 2010, respectively. Cash used in operating activities relates primarily to funding net losses, partially offset by share-based payments of consulting and other expenses. We expect to use cash for operating activities in the foreseeable future as we continue our operating activities.

Our investing activities used cash of approximately nil, $8,000 and $45,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and the period from inception to September 30, 2010, respectively. Changes in cash from investing activities are due to investment in patent. We no longer capitalize our patent expenditures.

Our financing activities provided cash of approximately $192,000, $178,000 and $1,053,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and the period from inception to September 30, 2010, respectively. Changes in cash from financing activities are proceeds from related party advances, stockholder contributions to capital, proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants and proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable.

Recent Financing Activities

On July 28, 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $10,200 at a stated interest rate of 10% per annum, or $12,000, whichever is higher.

In August and September 2010, we entered into convertible promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $40,000 together with two-year warrants to purchase 3,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. The promissory notes bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and the notes are due in one year. Upon default, the interest rate is 18%. As the Company is currently seeking to raise financing under a private placement transaction, the promissory notes contain an optional conversion clause whereby, during a 30-day period after the completion of such private placement transaction raising in excess of $250,000, the holders may either convert the promissory note at the share price of such private placement transaction or demand repayment out of the proceeds of such financing. Under the terms of the promissory note agreement, if the share price of such private placement is below $0.02 (the strike price of the warrants), the strike price of the warrants will be downward adjusted to such share price of the private placement. In accordance with the authoritative guidance related to instruments with down-round protection, we recorded a fair value liability of $41,000at issuance. The fair value liability is revalued quarterly utilizing Black-Scholes valuation model computations with the increase or decrease in fair value being reported in the statement of operations as other income (expense). At September 30, 2010, the Black-Scholes assumptions utilized were as follows: stock price of $0.02, volatility of 162%, risk-free rate of 0.53%, expected life of 2 years, dividend yield of 0.0%.

In August 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $1,000 at a stated interest rate of 8% per annum, payable upon demand by the holder.

In September 2010, we transferred $20,000 of accounts payable due to our Chief Executive Officer to a third party. These amounts were then converted into a convertible promissory note for $20,000 together with two-year warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. The promissory note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and the note is due in one year. Upon default, the interest rate is 18%. As the Company is currently seeking to raise financing under a private placement transaction, the promissory note contains an optional conversion clause whereby, during a 30-day period after the completion of such private placement transaction raising in excess of $250,000, the holder may either convert the promissory note at the share price of such private placement transaction or demand repayment out of the proceeds of such financing. Under the terms of the promissory note agreement, if the share price of such private placement is below $0.02 (the strike price of the warrants), the strike price of the warrants will be downward adjusted to such share price of the private placement. In accordance with the authoritative guidance related instruments with down-round protection, we recorded a fair value liability of approximately $8,300 at issuance. The fair value liability is revalued quarterly utilizing Black-Scholes valuation model computations with the increase or decrease in fair

Going Concern

In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report relating to our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, which states that we have experienced recurring losses from operations and have a substantial accumulated deficit. These conditions give rise to substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to expand operations and generate additional revenue and our ability to obtain additional funding will determine our ability to continue as a going concern. Our condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Summary

We are dependent on existing cash resources and external sources of financing to meet our working capital needs. Current sources of liquidity are insufficient to provide for budgeted and anticipated working capital requirements. We will therefore be required to seek additional financing to satisfy our working capital requirements. No assurances can be given that such capital will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. In addition to equity financing and strategic investments, we may seek additional related party loans. If we are unable to obtain any such additional financing or if such financing cannot be obtained on terms acceptable to us, we may be required to delay or scale back our operations, which would adversely affect our ability to generate future revenues and may force us to curtail or cease our operating activities.

To attain profitable operations, management’s plan is to execute its strategy of (i) continuing the development of our proprietary mobile marketing solution; (ii) building additional strategic partnerships with technology partners; (iii) building strategic partnerships with premier advertising inventory partners; and (iv) executing sales relationships with national and global brands in order to drive profitability. We will continue to be dependent on outside capital to fund our operations for the foreseeable future. Any financing we obtain may further dilute or otherwise impair the ownership interest of our current stockholders. If we fail to generate positive cash flows or fail to obtain additional capital when required, we could modify, delay or abandon some or all of our plans. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010, to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009

We had no revenues in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred net losses of approximately $387,000 and $1,165,000 and $179,000 and $1,053,000, respectively. Operating expenses increased to $291,000 and $1,034,000 in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $170,000 and $1,004,000 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to non-recurring stock-based consulting expenses incurred in the current year.

We expect that operating expenses will increase in 2010 as we implement our growth strategy.

Interest expense was $1,000 in the prior year compared to $18,000 in the current year quarter and $41,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $49,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Interest expense relates to convertible notes and amortization of debt discounts.

We recorded change in embedded derivative fair value liability of $78,000 in the current year quarter compared to $8,000 in the prior year quarter and $82,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $8,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2010, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of senior management, including Mr. Brook W. Lang, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our CEO/CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act. As previously reported under Item 9A(T) in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Annual Report”), we had numerous deficiencies in our disclosures controls as of December 31, 2009. In the Annual Report we described the remediation efforts we have begun to undertake in order to correct such deficiencies. As of September 30, 2010, the deficiencies described in the Annual Report still existed since the remediation efforts had not yet been fully implemented as of such date.

(b) Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors during the second fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting subsequent to the date we carried out our most recent evaluation. As previously reported in Item 9A(T) of the Annual Report, we had numerous material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In the Annual Report we described the remediation efforts we have begun to undertake in order to correct such material weaknesses. As of September 30, 2010, the material weaknesses described in the Annual Report still existed since the remediation efforts had not yet been fully implemented as of such date.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Commission on April 15, 2010, we are involved in one legal action. In August 2009, Robert Half International sued us claiming unpaid fees for services rendered. On February 24, 2010, a judgment was granted against us in the amount of $87,248.91, which amount bears interest at 12% per annum. We have included the judgment, net of payment of approximately $15,000, in accounts payable at September 30, 2010 and at approximately $87,000 at December 31, 2009. On June 24, 2010, we entered into a settlement and forbearance agreement with Robert Half International, whereby Robert Half International agreed not to pursue the judgment against us as long as we continued to make payments as follows: on August 1, 2010, $10,000; and $10,000 thereafter on the first day of every month until the amount of $74,000 is paid in full. As of September 30, 2010, we were not a party to any other pending legal proceeding and were not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following sets forth certain information for all securities we sold during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), other than those sales previously reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K:

On July 28, 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $10,200 at a stated interest rate of 10% per annum, or $12,000, whichever is higher.

In August 2010, we entered into a promissory note for $1,000 at a stated interest rate of 8% per annum, payable upon demand by the holder.

In September 2010, we transferred $20,000 of accounts payable due to our CEO to a third party. These amounts were then converted into a convertible promissory note for $20,000 together with two-year warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share. The promissory note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum, and the note is due in one year. Upon default, the interest rate is 18%. As the Company is currently seeking to raise financing under a private placement transaction, the promissory notes contain an optional conversion clause whereby, during a 30-day period after the completion of such private placement transaction raising in excess of $250,000, the holder may either convert the promissory note at the share price of such private placement transaction or demand repayment out of the proceeds of such financing. Under the terms of the promissory note agreement, if the share price of such private placement is below $0.02 (the strike price of the warrants), the strike price of the warrants will be downward adjusted to such share price of the private placement.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The exhibits required by this item are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: December 23, 2010

MONTAVO, INC.

By:

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,

and Principal Accounting Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit
31.1	Certification of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Certification of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Montavo, Inc. 10-Q