U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ox ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Fiscal Year Ended: ~~_______________________________~~September 30, 2011

xo TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period ~~from January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010~~_____________________________________--

Commission file number: 333-130197


DELTRON, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		86-1147933
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

11377 Markon Drive Garden Grove, CA 92841
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number: (714) 891-1795

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of the “large accelerated filer,” “accelerate filer”, “non-accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o

Accelerated Filer o

Non-Accelerated Filer o

Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of ~~December 30~~March31, ~~2010~~2011, there were 758,478,980 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.001, ~~issued~~ ~~and~~ outstanding ~~(includes 123,978,980 to be issued)~~. Of these, ~~421~~ 583,~~457~~478,980 shares were held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The market value of securities held by non-affiliates was $85,~~429~~251,~~159~~310.6082 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock as of March 31, ~~2010~~2011.

As of December 16, 2011, there were 33,641,087 common shares, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

If the following documents are incorporated by reference, briefly describe them and identify the part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) any annual report to security holders; (2) any proxy or information statement; and (3) any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). Not Applicable.

The Company is filing this Form 10-K without the consent of the predecessor auditor who audited the consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended. Upon receiving the predecessor’s consent, the Company will amend its Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item Number and Caption

Page

PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

ITEM 1. ~~BUSINESS~~

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 4.

~~SUBMISSION OF~~[REMOVED ~~MATTERS~~AND ~~TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~RESERVED]

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 10

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

1011

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 11

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

1711

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 17

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

1722

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

1823

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE

1924

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2025

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 22

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 24 28

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

2632

PART IV

2834

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

2834

EXPLANATORY NOTE

On May 26, 2010, Deltron, Inc. (“Deltron” or “the Company”) acquired all of the assets and liabilities of Blu Vu Deep Oil & Gas Exploration, Inc. (“Blu Vu”) including its ownership of 100% of the outstanding stock of Elasco, Inc. (“Elasco”) by issuance of 123,978,980 restricted common shares of its stock. The acquisition of Blu Vu’s assets and Elasco, Inc. by Deltron has been accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. The reverse recapitalization is the acquisition of a private operating company into a non-operating shell corporation with nominal net assets and is treated as a capital transaction, rather than a business combination. For accounting and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reporting purposes, Elasco is deemed to be the acquirer and continuing reporting entity. On August 13, 2010, the Company adopted the fiscal year end of the former shell company, Deltron, of September 30. Because Elasco is considered the accounting acquirer and the predecessor entity for SEC reporting purposes in the acquisition, this change in fiscal year end is deemed to be a change in Elasco’s fiscal year end and this Transition Report on Form 10-K covering the transition period from January 1, 2010, (the day after the end of Elasco’s previous fiscal year) to September 30, 2010 (the end of our new fiscal year) is being filed as required by applicable SEC rules.

Certain information responsive to items of this 10-K is incorporated herein by reference to either:

The Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2010

The Registrant’s Form 8-K/A filed on August 13, 2010

The Registrant’s Form S-8 filed on November 9, 2010

PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Except for historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, statements regarding our business strategy, future revenues and anticipated costs and expenses. Such forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements including the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” and similar language. Our actual results may differ significantly from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the sections “Business”, “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” You should carefully review the risks described in this Annual Report and in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements.

All references in this Form 10-K to the “Company,” “Deltron,” “we,” “us” or “our” are to Deltron, Inc.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Business Development

Deltron, Inc. (“Deltron” or “the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 14, 2005. Deltron is a public company currently listed on the over-the-counter (OTC) exchange under the symbol DTRO. It was formed as a land development company that intended to construct rental housing units in Costa Rica. It decided prior to the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, to redirect the business focus towards identifying and pursuing options regarding the development of a new business plan and direction.

On May 26, 2010, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Blu Vu Deep Oil & Gas Exploration (“Blu Vu”) under which Deltron has acquired all of the assets of Blu Vu, including, but not limited to, all of the stock of Blu Vu’s subsidiary, Elasco, Inc. (“Elasco”), in exchange for 123,978,980 shares of restricted common stock of Deltron.

Blu Vu, originally formed in June of 2008, is a technology company focused on the development of deep-sea exploration breathing technology for the oil and gas industries; as well as for use in fire and rescue, mining, hazardous materials industries, and recreational diving. Under the technical guidance of internationally renowned deep-sea diver, Dr. Jeffrey Bozanic, the Company expects to manufacture and mass market proprietary breathing equipment developed specifically for the oil & gas, mining, military, and safety industries, as well as the emerging market of recreational divers. Under the terms of the Agreement, Deltron acquired all of the assets associated with the operation of Blu Vu’s business.

On March 24, 2009, Blu Vu acquired Elasco, an engineered plastics and polyurethane molding company with a production facility in Southern California. Elasco is a leader in polyurethane and plastics technologies. Elasco has been in business since 1979 producing a variety of recreational and industrial products used in dynamic applications made mainly from polyurethane. The Company also has injection molding capability of reinforced and non-reinforced plastics, and produces many parts for its internal use as component parts in various assemblies. In what is currently a fragmented market, Elasco and Deltron expect to fill the need for improved, safer and more efficient breathing technology. This acquisition of Elasco is intended to allow Deltron to manufacture its proprietary rebreather technologies, as well as provide new synergies among future acquired companies that may develop, allowing for greater cost effectiveness, thus further enhancing each individual company’s strengths.

The molded polyurethane products segment that Elasco operates in is an industry that is extremely fragmented. Most companies operate in niche markets providing very specific products to their customer base. The majority of these companies use a lesser amount of automation than Elasco does. They also have significantly higher raw material costs because they typically purchase premixed packages through sources that significantly mark-up the price of the base materials. Elasco has a “vertically integrated” production facility that enables it to purchase raw materials at a significant discount from the typical price of premixed products.

Additionally, Deltron intends to seek complementary businesses to enhance its growth by acquiring companies with historically profitable results, strong balance sheets, high profit margins, and solid management teams in place. Under the assumption of finding appropriate target companies, Deltron expects to fulfill its strategic growth plan with additional acquisitions during each of the next several years.PRODUCTS

5Rebreather Systems

~~PRODUCTS~~“Normal” scuba is an open circuit system. Combining a high-pressure cylinder and a demand regulator, a diver inhales gas at ambient pressure, uses a little of the oxygen in the gas, and then exhales. When the diver exhales the gas, it bubbles to the surface, carrying as much as 98% of the original oxygen it contained. The “open circuit” comes from the fact that the exhaled gas is released on every breath.

~~Rebreather Systems~~5

The advantage that a rebreather has over “~~Normal~~normal” scuba system is anthat ~~open~~it ~~circuit~~recirculates ~~system. Combining~~the ~~a high-pressure~~gas ~~cylinder and~~ a ~~demand~~diver ~~regulator~~is breathing, aallowing the diver ~~inhales~~to breath from the same gas atover ~~ambient pressure~~and over again, ~~uses~~after aremoving ~~little~~the ofcarbon dioxide generated by human metabolism. Rebreathers provide gas to the ~~oxygen~~diver in an optimal mix for the ~~gas,~~depth at which they are diving. The system adds oxygen and ~~then~~other ~~exhales~~gases to make up what is consumed. ~~When~~ Because the gas is reused, instead of being “thrown away” with every breath, a diver ~~exhales~~can ~~the~~remain underwater far longer on much less gas. In fact, itfor ~~bubbles~~some todives, ~~the~~rebreathers ~~surface,~~can ~~carrying~~be as much as ~~98%~~fifty ~~of the~~times ~~original~~more ~~oxygen~~efficient on gas consumption than standard scuba tanks. This minimizes decompression obligations, or in some cases eliminates it ~~contained~~for shallower working dives. ~~The~~Less ~~“open~~decompression ~~circuit”~~time ~~comes~~means ~~from~~more ~~the~~working ~~fact that~~time, ~~the~~and ~~exhaled~~greater ~~gas~~cost isefficiency ~~released~~for onthe ~~every breath~~project.

~~The advantage~~Benefits that a rebreather has over “normal” scuba system is that it recirculates the gas a diver is breathing, allowing the diver to breath from the same gas over and over again, after removing the carbon dioxide generated by human metabolism. Rebreathers provide gas to the diver in an optimal mix for the depth at which they are diving. The system adds oxygen and other gases to make up what is consumed. Because the gas is reused, instead of ~~being~~ ~~“thrown~~Blu ~~away”~~Vu ~~with~~Rebreather ~~every~~technology breath, a diver can remain underwater far longer on much less gas. In fact, for some dives, rebreathers can be as much as fifty times more efficient on gas consumption than standard scuba tanks. This minimizes decompression obligations, or in some cases eliminates it for shallower working dives. Less decompression time means more working time, and greater cost efficiency for the project.

~~Benefits~~•Maximizes ofNo-Decompression ~~Blu Vu Rebreather technology~~ Time

•~~Maximizes~~Extended ~~No-Decompression~~diving ~~Time~~depth capability

•~~Extended~~Stealth ~~diving~~- ~~depth~~No ~~capability~~bubbles

•~~Stealth~~Negligible -limits Noto ~~bubbles~~Air Travel after Diving

•~~Negligible~~Ship ~~limits~~bottom ~~to Air Travel after Diving~~ inspections

•~~Ship bottom~~Size ~~inspections~~& weight of equipment package reduced

•~~Size &~~Helium ~~weight~~cost ofand ~~equipment~~consumption ~~package reduced~~minimized

~~•Helium cost~~Products ~~and~~- ~~consumption minimized~~Polyurethane

~~Products~~Elasco -makes ~~Polyurethane~~products for the recreational roller skate and skateboarding markets. They are of the high performance type used by dedicated enthusiasts in those sports. These products are sold to O.E.M. customers, who market and distribute them through channels specific to their individual retail outlets, as well as by direct marketing through their internet sales sites. Most are sold through distribution channels of specialty stores and roller rinks. They are differentiated from the typical product found in larger retail stores in that they are not considered a toy category, but rather a sporting good.

Elasco ~~makes~~ also produces a variety of industrial products ~~for~~that ~~the~~are ~~recreational~~used ~~roller~~on ~~skate~~assemblies and ~~skateboarding~~machinery ~~markets~~where a long life cycle is needed. ~~They~~ Some typical products are ofexercise ~~the~~equipment ~~high~~rollers, ~~performance~~bowling ~~type~~pin ~~used~~setter bypads ~~dedicated~~and ~~enthusiasts~~liners, ~~in those~~and ~~sports~~fire hydrant seals. ~~These~~Elasco’s ~~products~~polyurethane ~~are~~polymers ~~sold~~excel toin ~~O.E.M.~~the ~~customers,~~gap ~~who~~between ~~market~~rubber and ~~distribute~~ ~~them~~plastics, ~~through~~but ~~channels~~can mimic many rubbers and plastics with specific toformulations ~~their~~that ~~individual~~optimize ~~retail~~those ~~outlets,~~characteristics. A ~~as well~~recent asformula developed exclusively by ~~direct~~Elasco ~~marketing~~uses ~~through~~a ~~their~~natural ~~internet~~soy-based ~~sales~~resin ~~sites. Most~~as ~~are sold~~an ~~through~~ingredient ~~distribution~~to ~~channels~~make ofan ~~specialty~~elastomer ~~stores~~that ~~and~~performs ~~roller~~like ~~rinks~~other hydrocarbon derived polyurethanes. This ~~They are~~reduces ~~differentiated~~related carbon emissions from the ~~typical~~manufacturing process for that resin by 36%. This product ~~found~~is inmarketed ~~larger~~as ~~retail~~a ~~stores~~green alternative to oil based products, and is finding favor in the youth market that ~~they~~many ~~are~~of ~~not~~Elasco’s ~~considered~~products aservice. The ~~toy~~versatility ~~category,~~of ~~but~~its ~~rather~~compounding provides Elasco with a ~~sporting~~wide ~~good.~~range of performance characteristics outperforming other materials with:

~~Elasco also~~•Excellent ~~produces~~abrasion a variety of industrial products that are used on assemblies and machinery where a long life cycle is needed. Some typical products are exercise equipment rollers, bowling pin setter pads and liners, and fire hydrant seals. Elasco’s polyurethane polymers excel in the gap between rubber and plastics, but can mimic many rubbers and plastics with specific formulations that optimize those characteristics. A recent formula developed exclusively by Elasco uses a natural soy-based resin as an ingredient to make an elastomer that performs like other hydrocarbon derived polyurethanes. This reduces related carbon emissions from the manufacturing process for that resin by 36%. This product is marketed as a green alternative to oil based products, and is finding favor in the youth market that many of Elasco’s products service. The versatility of its compounding provides Elasco with a wide range of performance characteristics outperforming other materials with:resistance

•~~Excellent~~High ~~abrasion~~tensile ~~resistance~~and tear strengths

•~~High tensile~~Flexibility ~~and~~over ~~tear~~a ~~strengths~~wide range of temperatures

•~~Flexibility~~Increased elasticity over athe ~~wide~~entire ~~range~~hardness ~~of temperatures~~range

•~~Increased~~High ~~elasticity~~impact ~~over~~resistance ~~the~~and ~~entire~~vibration ~~hardness range~~dampening

6•Excellent resistance to oils, greases, and many solvents

•~~High impact~~Good ~~resistance and vibration dampening~~weatherability

•~~Excellent~~Resistance ~~resistance~~ to ~~oils,~~fungal ~~greases,~~ and ~~many~~microbial ~~solvents~~attack

•~~Good weatherability~~Ability to bond to metals, other rubbers, plastics, and polymer compounds

•~~Resistance~~High toload ~~fungal~~bearing ~~and microbial attack~~capabilities

~~•Ability to bond to metals, other rubbers, plastics, and polymer compounds~~6

~~•High load bearing capabilities~~MARKETS

~~MARKETS~~Rebreather Systems

Deltron has a strategy of growth through targeted industry marketing of proprietary Rebreather ~~Systems~~technology solutions that will increase productivity in commercial diving applications as well as improve the diving experience for the recreational diver.

~~Deltron has~~Rebreather aproducts ~~strategy~~ of ~~growth~~the ~~through~~type ~~targeted~~Deltron ~~industry~~anticipates ~~marketing~~producing ofprovide ~~proprietary Rebreather~~many ~~technology~~benefits ~~solutions~~over ~~that~~conventional ~~will~~open ~~increase~~circuit ~~productivity~~breathing inequipment. Those ~~commercial diving~~benefits ~~applications~~are aseven ~~well~~more assignificant ~~improve~~when ~~the~~extended ~~diving~~time ~~experience~~and ~~for~~greater ~~the recreational~~depth ~~diver~~are desired or required.

~~Rebreather~~Mining products of the type Deltron anticipates producing provide many benefits over conventional open circuit breathing equipment. Those benefits are even more significant when extended time and greater depth are desired or required.

~~Mining~~Rebreathers were originally developed in the 1700s as safety equipment for the mining industry. Mine collapses, underground fires, and toxic gas accumulations experienced by miners all demanded a supply of safe breathing gas. However, it is impossible for a miner to carry an adequate supply in open circuit cylinders, due to the weight and bulk of the equipment. Rebreathers should provide superior performance, as the efficiency of this equipment far surpasses open circuit options. However, we have no contracts in place at this time.

~~Rebreathers~~Fire ~~were~~& ~~originally~~Rescue developed in the 1700s as safety equipment for the mining industry. Mine collapses, underground fires, and toxic gas accumulations experienced by miners all demanded a supply of safe breathing gas. However, it is impossible for a miner to carry an adequate supply in open circuit cylinders, due to the weight and bulk of the equipment. Rebreathers should provide superior performance, as the efficiency of this equipment far surpasses open circuit options. However, we have no contracts in place at this time.

Fire & ~~Rescue~~fighters generally use rebreathers in fires where more than thirty minutes of air is needed. Existing air tanks last about one half hour, while rebreathers can last several hours without a substantial weight penalty. High rises and large building fires require gas supplies with extended durations for fire fighters. While Deltron will work to secure potential business in this area, we have no contracts in place at this time.

~~Fire fighters~~Hazardous ~~generally~~Materials use rebreathers in fires where more than thirty minutes of air is needed. Existing air tanks last about one half hour, while rebreathers can last several hours without a substantial weight penalty. High rises and large building fires require gas supplies with extended durations for fire fighters. While Deltron will work to secure potential business in this area, we have no contracts in place at this time.

~~Hazardous~~Rebreathers ~~Materials~~also play a part in industrial safety applications, where people work in hazardous environments. Industrial settings, such as sewage treatment plants and underground work locations, often accumulate toxic gases. When these environments need to be accessed, either the entire volume must be ventilated, an expensive and time-consuming job, or workers must wear self-contained breathing apparatus. While Deltron will work to secure potential business in this area, we have no contracts in place at this time.

~~Rebreathers~~Military ~~also~~& ~~play~~Special aOps part in industrial safety applications, where people work in hazardous environments. Industrial settings, such as sewage treatment plants and underground work locations, often accumulate toxic gases. When these environments need to be accessed, either the entire volume must be ventilated, an expensive and time-consuming job, or workers must wear self-contained breathing apparatus. While Deltron will work to secure potential business in this area, we have no contracts in place at this time.

~~Military~~For &decades ~~Special~~the ~~Ops~~military has used rebreathers for a wide range of activities. Typical operational uses include covert access, defusing explosive munitions, and specialized undercover operations. A historical example of when mixed gas CCRs were used for espionage purposes was when divers tapped telephone cables used by the Soviet Union during the cold war. Locked out of submarines at depths of up to 400 fsw / 120 msw, divers using rebreathers placed instrument packages on these cables, allowing United States intelligence units to gather information gleaned from supposedly secure communication sources. Deltron equipment will be capable of this type of work, with the same advantages of increased depth capability and reduced package size.

~~For decades~~The ~~the~~post-9/11 ~~military~~environment has ~~used~~seen ~~rebreathers~~the ~~for~~use ~~a wide range~~ of ~~activities. Typical~~rebreathers ~~operational~~extend ~~uses~~from ~~include~~traditional ~~covert~~military ~~access,~~users ~~defusing~~to ~~explosive~~other ~~munitions, and~~paramilitary ~~specialized~~groups ~~under~~focused ~~cover~~on ~~operations. A~~anti-terrorism ~~historical~~and ~~example~~drug ofinterdiction ~~when~~activities, ~~mixed gas~~such ~~CCRs~~as ~~were~~county ~~used~~SWAT ~~for~~teams, ~~espionage~~Coast ~~purposes~~Guard, ~~was~~and ~~when~~other ~~divers~~harbor ~~tapped~~monitoring ~~telephone cables used by the Soviet Union during the cold war~~groups. ~~Locked~~It ~~out~~is ~~of submarines~~likely atin ~~depths~~the ofyears upahead tothat ~~400~~both ~~fsw~~the /quantity ~~120~~and ~~msw,~~scope ~~divers~~of ~~using~~activities ~~rebreathers~~requiring ~~placed instrument~~rebreather ~~packages~~use onby ~~these~~armed ~~cables,~~forces ~~allowing~~will ~~United States intelligence units to gather information gleaned from supposedly secure communication sources~~increase.

~~Deltron equipment~~Mixed ~~will~~gas CCRs are often used by military EOD teams to defuse or explode mines. Rebreathers can be ~~capable~~manufactured ofto have low noise and magnetic signatures, and also allow divers to spend hours at depths up to 60 fsw / 18 msw with no decompression penalties, ideal for this type of work,. The ~~with~~rebreathers ~~the~~under development by Deltron provide these same ~~advantages~~capabilities, ~~of increased~~in ~~depth~~a ~~capability~~much smaller, lighter, and ~~reduced~~more ~~package~~reliable ~~size~~package.

~~The post-9/11~~Deltron ~~environment~~will ~~has~~attempt ~~seen~~to ~~the~~capitalize ~~use~~on ofthe ~~rebreathers~~continuing ~~extend~~drive ~~from traditional military users~~ to ~~other~~upgrade ~~paramilitary groups focused on anti-terrorism~~ and ~~drug interdiction~~modernize ~~activities,~~the ~~such~~equipment asbeing ~~county~~used ~~SWAT~~by ~~teams,~~today’s ~~Coast~~military ~~Guard,~~ and ~~other harbor~~public ~~monitoring~~safety ~~groups~~dive teams. ItHowever, iswe ~~likely~~have inno ~~the~~contracts ~~years~~in ~~ahead~~place ~~that~~at ~~both~~this ~~the quantity and scope of activities requiring rebreather use by armed forces will increase~~time.

~~Mixed gas~~Recreational ~~CCRs~~Diving are often used by military EOD teams to defuse or explode mines. Rebreathers can be manufactured to have low noise and magnetic signatures, and also allow divers to spend hours at depths up to 60 fsw / 18 msw with no decompression penalties, ideal for this type of work. The rebreathers under development by Deltron provide these same capabilities, in a much smaller, lighter, and more reliable package.

~~Deltron will~~Rebreather ~~attempt~~technology torepresents ~~capitalize~~one onof the ~~continuing~~fastest ~~drive~~growing tosegments ~~upgrade~~of ~~and~~the ~~modernize~~civilian ~~the equipment~~diving ~~being~~market. About ~~used~~two bydozen ~~today’s~~private ~~military~~makers of rebreather systems and ~~public~~components ~~safety~~constitute ~~dive~~what ~~teams~~is a fragmented market. ~~However~~ Importantly, no single manufacturer is currently capable of mass commercialization. Deltron is working to fill this market void, however, we have no contracts in place at this time.

~~Recreational~~POLYURETHANE ~~Diving~~ MARKETS

~~Rebreather~~High ~~technology~~load-bearing ~~represents~~capacity ~~one~~(two ofto ~~the~~four ~~fastest~~times ~~growing segments~~that of ~~the~~conventional ~~civilian~~rubber), ~~diving~~long ~~market. About~~wear ~~two~~(three ~~dozen~~to ~~private~~six ~~makers~~times that of ~~rebreather~~ ~~systems~~conventional ~~and~~rubber, ~~components~~cut ~~constitute what is a fragmented market. Importantly~~resistance, nolow ~~single~~rolling ~~manufacturer~~resistance isand ~~currently~~non-marking ~~capable~~ of ~~mass commercialization. Deltron~~concrete isfloors ~~working~~are toprincipal ~~fill~~reasons ~~this~~why ~~market~~urethanes ~~void,~~are ~~however, we have no contracts in place at this time~~preferred.

~~POLYURETHANE~~Sanitary ~~MARKETS~~waste facilities create harsh environments, but urethanes outperform other elastomers in these guide wheels. The mining separator screens are another example in which superior abrasion, impact and cut resistance combine with resilience to provide long service life.

~~High load-bearing~~The ~~capacity~~high ~~(two~~compression forces required to ~~four~~deflect ~~times~~urethanes ~~that~~are ofused ~~conventional~~in ~~rubber),~~metal-forming ~~long~~operations. Forming ~~wear (three~~costs toare ~~six~~reduced ~~times~~because ~~that~~the ofneed ~~conventional~~for ~~rubber,~~matched ~~cut~~punches and dies is eliminated. Urethanes do not scratch metal. Snowplow blades prevent road damage while resisting abrasion and providing impact resistance, at very low ~~rolling resistance~~temperatures. The ~~and~~castable ~~non-marking~~nature of ~~concrete~~urethanes ~~floors~~permits ~~are~~precision ~~principal~~cast ~~reasons~~locators ~~why~~ and fixtures to be used in automated assembly operations. While holding dimensional tolerances, urethanes ~~are~~resist ~~preferred~~wear and impact. Resistance to wear and flex fatigue under extreme weather conditions makes urethane tracks reliable in snowmobiles.

~~Sanitary~~Today’s ~~waste~~top-of-the-line ~~facilities~~bowling ~~create~~balls ~~harsh~~are ~~environments,~~cast ~~but~~urethane. They ~~urethanes outperform~~offer ~~other~~a ~~elastomers~~more inconsistent ~~these~~level ~~guide~~of ~~wheels. The~~performance, ~~mining~~long ~~separator screens~~life, ~~are~~and ~~another~~less ~~example~~deflection inwhen hitting pins, which ~~superior~~translates ~~abrasion,~~into ~~impact~~higher ~~and~~scores. Good ~~cut resistance~~bowlers ~~combine~~find ~~with~~the ~~resilience~~balls can be made to ~~provide~~“hook” ~~long~~more ~~service~~for ~~life~~higher scores.

~~The high compression forces required to deflect urethanes are used in metal~~Silk-~~forming operations. Forming~~screening ~~costs~~applications ~~are~~require ~~reduced~~durability ~~because~~for the ~~need~~straight ~~for~~edges, ~~matched~~flexibility, ~~punches~~ and ~~dies~~solvent isresistance ~~eliminated. Urethanes~~without dodamaging ~~not~~the ~~scratch~~screen ~~metal~~itself. ~~Snowplow blades prevent road damage while resisting abrasion and providing impact resistance at very low temperatures.~~ The castable nature of urethanes ~~permits~~ ~~precision~~– ~~cast~~which ~~locators~~do ~~and~~not ~~fixtures~~require tohigh bepressure ~~used~~like intypical ~~automated~~rubber ~~assembly operations. While~~and ~~holding~~plastic ~~dimensional~~– ~~tolerances~~permits quick, ~~urethanes~~low-cost ~~resist~~molds ~~wear~~ and ~~impact. Resistance~~fast toresponse ~~wear~~time ~~and flex fatigue under extreme weather conditions makes urethane tracks reliable~~ in ~~snowmobiles~~many cases.

~~Today’s top-of-~~Urethanes are currently used in the~~-line~~ ~~bowling~~manufacture ~~balls~~of ~~are~~everything ~~cast~~from ~~urethane. They~~skate ~~offer~~and aroller-coaster ~~more consistent~~wheels ~~level~~to ofconveyor ~~performance~~drive rollers. Weatherability, ~~long~~shock ~~life,~~absorption and ~~less~~abrasion ~~deflection~~resistance ~~when~~are ~~hitting pins,~~the ~~which~~principal ~~translates~~reasons, ~~into~~but ~~higher~~high ~~scores. Good~~load-bearing ~~bowlers~~properties, ~~find~~resilience, ~~the~~non-marking ~~balls~~characteristics, ~~can be~~and ~~made~~strong bonding to ~~“hook”~~metal ~~more~~hubs ~~for~~are ~~higher~~also ~~scores~~important.

Silk-screening applications require durability for the straight edges, flexibility, and solvent resistance without damaging the screen itself. The castable nature of urethanes – which do not require high pressure like typical rubber and plastic – permits quick, low-cost molds and fast response time in many cases.EMPLOYEES

~~Urethanes~~As ~~are~~of ~~currently used in~~ the ~~manufacture~~date of ~~everything~~this ~~from skate~~Report ~~and~~on ~~roller~~Form 10-~~coaster~~K, ~~wheels~~the toCompany ~~conveyor~~had ~~drive~~48 ~~rollers. Weatherability, shock~~full ~~absorption~~time employees and ~~abrasion~~one ~~resistance~~part-time ~~are the principal~~ employee.

~~reasons,~~BANKRUPTCY ~~but~~OR ~~high~~SIMILAR ~~load-bearing properties, resilience, non-marking characteristics, and strong bonding to metal hubs are also important.~~PROCEEDINGS

~~EMPLOYEES~~The Company has not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings.

As of the date of this Report on Form 10-K, the Company had 48 full time employees and one part-time employee.

BANKRUPTCY OR SIMILAR PROCEEDINGS

The Company has not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Because we are a “smaller reporting company” as that term is defined by the SEC, we are not required to present risk factors at this time.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

Deltron’s principal place of business and corporate offices is located at 11377 Markon Drive, Garden Grove, CA 92841. ~~We have been a tenant at this location since 1994 and renewed its lease until 2015.~~ The rental fee is $5,533 per month for this 7,000 square foot industrial building.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Legal Proceedings

No legal or governmental proceedings are presently pending or, to our knowledge, threatened, to which we are a party.

ITEM 4.

(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

“Bid” and “ask” prices for our common stock have been quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”) under the symbol “DTRO.OB” since December 20, 2006. However, our stock did not trade until January 21, 2010. The following chart shows the high and low trading price from that date until the end of the most recent fiscal year by quarter. The prices have been adjusted for the one for one-thousand (1:1,000) reverse split in October 2011.

Quarter Ended	High	Low
September 30, 2010	$0.029	$0.001
September 30, 2011	$0.30	$0.20
June 30, 2010	$0.12	$0.0167
June 30, 2011	$0.70	$0.60
March 31, 2010	$0.02	$0.0037
March 31, 2011	$1.00	$0.80
December 31, 2010	$1.30	$0.70
September 30, 2010	$1.90	$1.60
June 30, 2010	$30.00	$20.00
March 31, 2010	$20.00	$20.00

As of ~~December~~October 205, ~~2010~~ 2011, we had ~~162~~169 shareholders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or

our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.

We have not declared any dividends, and we do not plan to declare any dividend in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Under the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan for Employees, Contractors, Consultants, Advisors, Board Advisors, Board Members and Others (the “Plan”), the Company is authorized to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock or options to purchase shares of common stock. As of the date of this filing, the Company has authorized issuance of 80148,000,000 shares under the Plan.


category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	0	0	0
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	0	0	52,000,000
Total

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

As previously described, we completed an Asset Purchase under which Deltron acquired the assets of Blu Vu Deep Oil & Gas Exploration, Inc. The transaction was treated as a reverse recapitalization, with ~~Blu Vu~~BluVu’s wholly owned subsidiary, Elasco, Inc. (“Elasco”) becoming the accounting acquirer. Therefore, Deltron assumed the fiscal year end of Elasco of December 31. On August 13, 2010, following the completion of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company adopted the fiscal year end of the former shell Company of September 30 for financial reporting purposes.

The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition and results of operations as well as our liquidity and capital resources for the periods described. The discussion reflects the financial condition and results of operations as of and for the ~~transition~~ period ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009 (unaudited)~~2010. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these forward-looking statements.

We are a manufacturing company with two distinct business segments, polyurethane and rebreather. Our primary business is Elasco which is focused on manufacturing technology for plastic and ~~polyurethane products. Our secondary business segment is focused on the development of deep-sea exploration breathing technology marketed as Blu Vu.~~

polyurethane products.Our secondary business segment is focused on the development of deep-sea exploration breathing technology marketed as Blu Vu.

Polyurethane Products

Our polyurethane products are manufactured and sold by our wholly owned subsidiary, Elasco, which makes products for the recreational roller skate and skateboarding markets. They are of the high performance type used by dedicated enthusiasts in those sports. These products are sold to O.E.M. customers, who market and distribute them through channels specific to their individual retail outlets, as well as by direct marketing through their internet sales sites. Most are sold through distribution channels of specialty stores and roller rinks. They are differentiated from the typical product found in larger retail stores in that they are not considered a toy category, but rather a sporting good.

Elasco also produces a variety of industrial products that are used on assemblies and machinery where a long life cycle is needed. Some typical products are exercise equipment rollers, bowling pin setter pads and liners, and fire hydrant seals. Elasco’s polyurethane polymers excel in the gap between rubber and plastics, but can mimic many rubbers and plastics with specific formulations that optimize those characteristics. A recent formula developed exclusively by Elasco uses a natural soy-based resin as an ingredient to make an elastomer that performs like other hydrocarbon derived polyurethanes. This reduces related carbon emissions from the manufacturing process for that resin by 36%. This product is marketed as a green alternative to oil based products, and is finding favor in the youth market that many of Elasco’s products service.

Rebreather System

“Normal” scuba is an open circuit system. Combining a high-pressure cylinder and a demand regulator, a diver inhales gas at ambient pressure, uses a little of the oxygen in the gas, and then exhales. When the diver exhales the gas, it bubbles to the surface, carrying as much as 98% of the original oxygen it contained. The “open circuit” comes from the fact that the exhaled gas is released on every breath.

The advantage that a rebreather has over “normal” scuba system is that it recirculates the gas a diver is breathing, allowing the diver to breath from the same gas over and over again, after removing the carbon dioxide generated by human metabolism. Rebreathers provide gas to the diver in an optimal mix for the depth at which they are diving. The system adds oxygen and other gases to make up what is consumed. Because the gas is reused, instead of being “thrown away” with every breath, a diver can remain underwater far longer on much less gas. In fact, for some dives, rebreathers can be as much as fifty times more efficient on gas consumption than standard scuba tanks. This minimizes decompression obligations, or in some cases eliminates it for shallower working dives. Less decompression time means more working time, and greater cost efficiency for the project.

In February 2011, the Company purchased technology relating to an invention for submersible boat rebreather systems. The Company intends to manufacture and sell these systems for use in non-pressurized sport and military subs. Typical uses would be in areas where extended times underwater would be beneficial like sport divers, ports and oil and gas equipment inspections, government and military security and university biologist research.

Business operations

As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $311.080 million, and as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2009~~2010, our accumulated deficit was approximately $23.721 million. We incurred operating losses of $~~189~~212,~~532~~737 for the year ended September 30, 2011 and $~~610~~189,~~866~~532 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We ~~and 2009, respectively, and~~ incurred net losses of $~~360~~7,~~590~~894,159 and $~~400~~360,~~564~~590 for those respective periods. We expect our net losses to continue for at least the next couple of years. We anticipate that a substantial portion of our capital resources and efforts will be focused on the scale up due to expansion via acquisition, product development and other general corporate purposes, including the payment of legal fees due to our acquisitions.

As of September 30, 2010, our current liabilities of approximately $1.31 million exceeded our current assets of approximately $1.05 million by $253,061. As part of the $1.31 million of current liabilities we have $96,167, net of note discount of $79,333, of convertible notes to related parties. We are currently planning to issue additional stocks and convertible notes to support our expansion. As a result, the additional equity funding may result in significant dilution to existing stockholders. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay or curtail significantly our development and commercialization activities. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results of operations and could ultimately cause us to have to cease operations.12

substantial portion of our capital resources and efforts will be focused on the scale up due to expansion via acquisition, product development and other general corporate purposes, including the payment of legal fees due to our acquisitions.

As of September 30, 2011, our current liabilities of approximately $11.8 million exceeded our current assets of approximately $1,302,500 by $10,497,500 and our net losses will continue for the foreseeable future. As part of the $11.8 million of current liabilities we have $3,165,741, of convertible notes to unrelated parties. We are currently planning to issue additional stocks and convertible notes to support our expansion. As a result, the additional equity funding may result in significant dilution to existing stockholders. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay or curtail significantly our development and commercialization activities. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results of operations and could ultimately cause us to have to cease operations.

Financial Operations Overview

Sales

Our sales are derived from the sale of plastic and polyurethane products. Customers are generally billed at shipping of products. We currently have not generated any revenues from the sale of rebreather system for the ~~nine~~year ~~month periods~~ ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for plastic and polyurethane products represents the cost of direct labor, raw material, supplies and other miscellaneous support expenses. No cost of sales for rebreather system is recorded because we have not generated any revenues from the sale of rebreather system.

Selling, General and Administrative

Our selling expenses consist primarily of personnel, media, support and travel costs to inform user organizations and consumers of our products. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel, occupancy, legal, consulting and administrative and support costs for our operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our ~~consolidated~~ financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could therefore differ ~~materially~~ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in ~~item~~Item 151 of this report. We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Principles of Consolidations

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Elasco. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, doubtful accounts, intangible assets, and income taxes, valuation of equity and debt instruments, contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all short term investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company deposits its cash with major financial institutions and may at times exceed the federally insured limit of $250,000. At September 30, 2011 cash did not exceed the federally insured limit. The Company believes that the risk of loss is minimal. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses related to cash deposits with financial institutions.

Accounts Receivable

Inventory

Inventory consists of raw material, work in progress, and finished goods. It is stated at the lower of cost or market on a first in, first out (FIFO) basis. The Company also evaluates and reserves allowance of obsolescence of its inventories.

Property and Equipment and Depreciation Policy

Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Cost of repairs and maintenance are expensed as they are incurred. Major repairs that extend the useful life of equipment are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining estimated useful life. When property and equipment are sold or otherwise disposed, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the gains or losses realized on the disposition are reflected in operations. The Company uses the straight-line method in computing depreciation for financial reporting purposes.

Investments

The Company routinely classify certain equity securities as available for sale and measure them at market value (fair value). Changes in unrealized gains or losses are recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of shareholders' equity.

Intangible asset

Costs paid by the Company related to the establishment, transfer and purchase of patented and unpatented technology and other intangibles are capitalized and amortized, depending on the estimated useful life of the technology. The useful life of the intangible asset is ten years. Amortization is on the straight-line method.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets with finite lives. The Company assesses potential impairments to its long-lived assets when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is deemed not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted or discounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Any required impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value and is recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and a charge to operating results. Based upon the most recent assessment as of September 30, 2011, management has determined there was an impairment and has taken a charge of $266,250 to write down long-lived asset to its fair value.

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes the tax effects of transactions in the year in which such transactions enter into the determination of net income, regardless of when reported for tax purposes. Deferred taxes are provided in the financial statements under ASC 740-20 to give effect to the resulting temporary differences which may arise from differences in the bases of fixed assets, depreciation methods, allowances, and start-up costs based on the income taxes expected to be payable in future years.

The Company follows the provisions of uncertain tax positions as addressed in ASC 740-10-65-1. The Company recognized no increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company has no tax position as of September 30, 2011 for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about such timing of such deductibility. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. No such interest or penalties were recognized during the periods presented. The Company had no accruals for interest and penalties at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010. The Company’s utilization of any net operating loss carry forward may be unlikely as a result of its continued losses.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The accounting standards regarding fair value of financial instruments and related fair value measurements define financial instruments and require disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. The Company considers the carrying amount of cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, to approximate their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization.

The Company has also adopted ASC 820-10 (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) which defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follow:


	·	Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.


	·	Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.


	·	Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued convertible notes totaling $175,500. As of September 30, 2010, the carrying value of these convertible notes was $96,167. The Company used level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology and the fair value was determined to be approximately $175,000 using cash flows discounted at relevant market interest rates in effect at year end there is no observable market price. In September 2011, we received shares in a publicly traded company which we classified as available for sale and measured them at market value (fair value). Changes in unrealized gains or losses are recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of shareholder’s equity. The Company used level 1 inputs for its valuation methodology and the fair value was determined to be approximately $138,000.

Revenue Recognition

~~Sales~~The ~~for~~Company ~~our~~recognizes ~~polyurethane~~revenues ~~products~~through its consolidated fully owned subsidiary. Revenues are recognized ~~when~~from ~~our plastic~~product orsales ~~polyurethane~~upon ~~products~~shipping, ~~are~~at ~~shipped~~which time title passes to ~~our~~the ~~customers. Currently for~~customer ~~rebreather~~provided ~~system,~~that there ~~have~~are ~~not~~no ~~been~~uncertainties ~~any~~regarding ~~revenues~~customer ~~recognized~~acceptance, ~~from~~persuasive ~~the~~evidence ~~sale~~ of ~~its~~an ~~products~~arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed and determinable and collectability is deemed probable.

~~Results~~Advertising ~~of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)~~Costs

Advertising costs are expensed when incurred.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company has adopted ASC 718-20 (formerly SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment -revised 2004) (“ASC718-20”) and related interpretations which establish the accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee services. Under ASC 718-20, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award. The expense is recognized over the employees’ requisite service period, generally the vesting period of the award.

Segment Information

Based on the criteria established by ASC Topic 280 “Segment report” (formerly SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”), the Company uses the management approach for determining which, if any, of its products and services, locations, customers or management structures constitute a reportable business segment. The management approach designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of any reportable segments. As of September 30, 2011, the Company mainly operated in two principal segments – development of the rebreather system and sales of polyurethane elastomer products. The rebreather system is still under development and has not generated any revenue.

Significant Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-13, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. This ASU provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts. The ASU modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. As a result, current GAAP will be improved by eliminating an entity’s ability to assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform Step 2 because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate the goodwill is more likely than not impaired. As a result, goodwill impairments may be reported sooner than under current practice. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310), A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Trouble Debt Restructuring. Under the amendments of this ASU, in evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, a creditor must separately conclude that both of the following exist: 1) the restructuring constitutes a concession; 2) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The amendments also clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession and on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Under the amendments of this ASU will result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. This ASU is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Under the amendments of this ASU, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. In a single continuous statement, the entity is required to present the components of net income and total net income, the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with the total of comprehensive income in that statement. In the two-statement approach, an entity is required to present components of net income and total net income in the statement of net income. The statement of other comprehensive income should immediately follow the statement of net income and include the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with a

total for comprehensive income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangible – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Testing Goodwill for Impairment. Under the amendments of this ASU, an entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, as described in paragraph 350-20-35-4. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the entity is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any, as described in paragraph 350-20-35-9. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. An entity may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. This ASU is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended September 30, 2011 and nine months ended September 30, 2010

As earlier described, we operate in two business segments: Polyurethane products and Rebreather system. Our Elasco business focuses on the delivery of plastic and polyurethane product to our customer. Its principal business is manufacturing and selling of open cast molded polyurethane elastomer products such as skateboard, roller skate, and industrial wheels. Our Rebreather system, which is marketed as Blu Vu, is engaged in the potential manufacture and mass-market of proprietary breathing equipment developed specifically for the oil and gas, mining and safety industries, and military and recreational divers.

The following table presents consolidated statement of operations data for each of the periods indicated as:

		Nine months ended				Percent
	Year Ended
	~~September 30,~~	September 30,		September 30,		Percent
		2010		2009 (Unaudited)		Change
		2011		2010		Change
Sales		3,504,513	~~2,546,606~~	2,546,606	~~1,511,133~~	6938%
Cost of sales		2,768,256	~~2,269,102~~	2,269,102	~~1,364,162~~	6622%
Gross profit		736,257	~~277,504~~	277,504	~~146,971~~	89165%
Selling, general and administrative		948,994	~~467,036~~	467,036	~~757,837~~	~~(38)~~103%
Operating loss		(212,737)	~~(189,532)~~	(189,532)	~~(610,866)~~	(~~69)~~12%)
Other income (expense), net			(169,458)		210,302	(181)%
Other expense, net		(7,677,153)		(169,458)		(4,430%)
Net (loss)			(360,590)		(400,564)	(10)%
Net loss		(7,894,159)		(360,590)		(2,089%)

1318

Sales

With respect to our polyurethane business, our sales increased by $1957,~~035,473~~907 for the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011, compared to the ~~same period~~nine inmonths ~~2009~~ended September 30, 2010, due to ~~recovery~~the inperiod ~~the~~being ~~economy~~for ~~and~~a ~~introduction~~complete ofyear ~~our~~as ~~new products~~opposed to ~~our~~nine ~~current customer base~~months.

In respect to our rebreather product, we have not produced sales as of September 30, ~~2010 and 2009~~2011.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales consists of payroll, raw material, supplies and other miscellaneous costs for the Polyurethane products. For the ~~nine-month~~ ~~period~~year ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011, costs of sales of $2,~~269~~768,~~102~~256 consist primarily of labor cost of $~~845~~926,~~120~~972, raw material cost of $1,~~179~~505,~~946~~208, utilities of $133,155 and other costs of $~~244~~202,~~036~~921. For the nine-month period ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010, ~~cost~~ costs of sales of $12,~~364~~269,~~162~~102 ~~consisted~~consist primarily of labor ~~costs~~cost of $~~566~~845,~~161~~120, raw material cost of $~~603~~1,~~959~~179,946 and other costs of $~~194~~244,~~042~~036. We expect costs of sales will increase as an absolute number as more plastic and polyurethane products are produced. However, we expect the cost of sales to decrease as a percentage of revenues as we improve our operating efficiency and increase the automation of certain processes.

Selling, General and Administration

Selling, general and administrative expenses associated with our polyurethane business consist primarily of payroll costs, rental fee, professional fee, insurance, and other expense. For the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011, selling, general and ~~2009~~administrative expenses included the following: payroll and benefits $128,990, ~~our~~outside ~~selling~~services $9,972, ~~general~~professional fees $16,263, rent expense $66,396, insurance expenses $32,043, and ~~administrative~~ other expenses ~~for~~$52,876. For ~~each~~the ~~segment~~nine ~~are~~months ended September 30, 2010 expenses were as follows: payroll and benefits $108,294, rent expense $49,797, consulting $32,127, professional fee $18,435, insurance expenses $20,224 and other expenses $45,281.

		2010		2009 (Unaudited)
Rebreather	$	192,878	$	480,662
Polyurethane		274,158		277,175
	$	467,036	$	757,837

Comparing the year ended September 30, 2011, with the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses of $481,958 were primarily due to an increase in professional fees of $214,188 and an increase of amortization expense of $183,750. Other expenses remained consistent for the respective periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. General and administrative expenses associated with our rebreather system consisted primary of consulting and professional fees.

~~Selling,~~Other ~~general and administrative expenses associated with our polyurethane business consist primarily of payroll costs, rental fee, professional fee, insurance, and other~~ expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses included the following: payroll and benefits $108,294, consulting fee $32,127, professional fees $18,435, rent expense $49,797, insurance expenses $20,224, and other expenses $45,281. For the comparable period in 2009 expenses were as follows: payroll and benefits $134,343, rent expense $49,797, consulting $36,538, professional fee $9,716, insurance expenses $14,447, and other expenses $32,334.

~~Comparing~~For the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011 we incurred other expenses of $7,678,178 ~~with~~which ~~the~~consisted ~~same period~~of: ininterest ~~2009~~expense of $255,467, non-cash derivative expense of $7,159,130 and an impairment charge to intangible assets of $266,250. For the ~~decrease~~nine inmonths ~~selling~~ended September 30, ~~general~~2010, ~~and~~we ~~administrative~~incurred other expenses ~~were~~ of $169,458, which consisted primarily ~~due~~of to$96,167 ~~decrease~~amortization inof ~~payroll~~note ~~and~~discount ~~benefits~~related byto ~~$26,049~~the beneficial conversion feature embedded in the ~~2010 period~~$175,500 asconvertible anotes, ~~result~~and oftotal ainterest ~~reduction~~of in$53,397 ~~staff~~paid and accrued on the ~~reassignment~~$125,000 line of ~~staff~~credit, ~~to another~~$1,095,110 ~~department. Other~~long ~~expenses~~term ~~remained~~promissory ~~consistent~~notes, ~~for~~and ~~the~~$175,500 ~~nine~~convertible ~~months ended~~notes ~~September~~due ~~30,~~to ~~2010~~certain shareholders and ~~2009~~officer.

General and administrative expenses associated with our Blu Vu rebreather system consist primary of consulting and professional fees. Comparing the general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, with the same period in 2009, the decrease was primarily due to the Company ended various consulting agreements.

Other income (expense)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we incurred other expenses of $169,458, which consisted primarily $96,167 amortization of note discount resulted from beneficial conversion feature embedded in the $175,500 convertible notes; total interest of $53,397 paid and accrued on the $125,000 line of credit, $1,095,110 long term promissory notes, and $175,500 convertible notes due to certain shareholders and officer.

For the comparable period in 2009, we incurred interest expense of $58,948 paid and accrued on the $125,000 line of credit and $1,095,110 long term promissory notes due to a shareholder and officer. We also recorded a $256,750 gain on extinguishments of a debt due to the former owner of Elasco.

Net Loss

The ~~decrease~~increase in net loss of $397,~~974~~894,159 for the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011, compared to the ~~same~~nine ~~period~~months inended ~~2009~~September 30, 2010, was a net result of: an increase in our ~~polyurethane~~professional ~~product sales~~fees, aan ~~decrease~~increase in ~~selling,~~gross ~~general~~profit ~~and administration expenses~~ due to ~~the~~efficiencies ~~reduction~~relating ofto ~~consulting~~increased ~~expense~~sales, an increase in ~~2010;~~interest ~~the gain~~expense ~~recorded~~due onto the ~~extinguishment~~addition of ~~owners~~the ~~debt of~~ $~~256~~3,~~760~~150,000 innote ~~2009~~recorded ~~related to~~in ~~the~~2011 ~~acquisition of Elasco;~~ and ~~the~~an increase inof ~~interest~~derivative expense of $907,~~616 resulted~~159,130 ~~from~~and ~~amortization~~an ofimpairment ~~beneficial~~charge ~~conversion~~on ~~option~~the ~~embedded~~intangible inasset ~~the convertible~~of ~~notes~~$266,250 in ~~2010~~2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have incurred significant losses. As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $311.08 0 million, and as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2009~~2010, our accumulated deficit was approximately $23.721 million. We have not yet achieved profitability and anticipate that we will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. We expect that our ~~selling,~~sales and general and administrative expenses will continue to grow and, as a result, we will need to generate significant product revenues to achieve profitability. We may never achieve profitability.

Due to the continued losses incurred from our operations, as of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, we had approximately $14,~~852~~496 in cash and cash equivalents and a working capital deficit of $~~253~~10,~~061~~497,500 compared to $291,~~986~~852 in cash and cash equivalents and a working capital deficit of $91253,~~002~~061 at ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2009~~2010.

Operating Capital and Capital Expenditure Requirements

Our continued operating losses and limited capital raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and we need to raise substantial additional funds in the next 12 months in order to continue to conduct our business. Until we can generate a sufficient amount of revenues to finance our cash requirements, which we may never do, we expect to finance future cash needs primarily through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, borrowings or strategic collaborations.

We need additional funds to continue our operations and will need substantial additional funds before we can generate revenue from our Blu Vu rebreather system. We are currently exploring additional sources of capital; however, we do not know whether additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all, especially given the economic conditions that currently prevail. In addition, any additional equity funding may result in significant dilution to existing stockholders, and, if we incur additional debt financing, a substantial portion of our operating cash flow may be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness, thus limiting funds available for our business activities.

We expect to continue to incur operating losses in the future and to make capital expenditures to expand our polyurethane operations and to market our Blu Vu rebreather system (including upgrading our plant equipment) and to scale up our sales efforts. We expect that our existing cash will be used to fund working capital and for capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes, including the repayment of debt incurred as a result of our acquisitions. Although since September 30, 2010, we have raised gross proceeds of $174,250 through the issuance of convertible promissory notes, we anticipate that our cash on hand (including the proceeds from these promissory notes) and cash generated through our operations will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next 12 months. In addition we will have to repay the outstanding notes plus interest. We therefore anticipate raising additional funds in the near future.

plant equipment) and to scale up our sales efforts. We expect that our existing cash will be used to fund working capital and for capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes, including the repayment of debt incurred as a result of our acquisitions. Although since September 30, 2010, we have raised gross proceeds of $77,500 through the sale of convertible promissory notes, we anticipate that our cash on hand (including the proceeds from these promissory notes) and cash generated through our operations will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next 12 months. In addition we will have to repay the outstanding notes plus interest. We therefore anticipate raising additional funds in the near future.

Sources of Liquidity

Since our inception substantially all of our operations have been financed primarily from sales of our polyurethane products and equity and debt financings. For ~~the~~year ~~nine months~~ ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011, we had received $~~175~~174,~~500~~250 from issuance of convertible notes.

Cash Flows

Net cash used inby operating activities was $~~214~~154,~~140~~072 for the ~~nine months~~year ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011, compared to $~~615~~214,~~401~~140 for the ~~same~~nine month period ended September 30, ~~2009~~2010. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash ~~used~~ of $~~401~~2,~~261~~644 was primarily attributable to ~~increases~~the incollection ~~our polyurethane~~of ~~product~~accounts ~~sales~~receivable and non-cash expenses.

~~There was no net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.~~20

~~Net~~There was $12,030 net cash ~~proceeds~~used ~~from~~in ~~financing~~investing activities for the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended September 30, ~~2010,~~2011 ~~were~~for ~~$186,006~~the ~~which~~purchase ~~was~~of ~~primarily~~equipment ~~derived~~and ~~from borrowing~~$0 ~~from~~cash ~~certain~~used ~~shareholders~~for bythe ~~issuance~~nine ofmonths ~~convertible~~ended ~~notes.~~September 30, 2010.

~~For~~Net ~~the~~cash ~~nine~~proceeds ~~months~~from financing activities for the year ended September 30, ~~2009~~2011, ~~proceeds~~was ~~from sales of common stocks were~~ $~~605~~168,~~222,~~746 ~~net~~which ofwas ~~offering~~mainly ~~costs,~~derived ~~through~~from athe ~~Regulation~~issuance ~~S offering~~of convertible notes.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, we have a contractual obligation to pay the line of credit of $~~125~~100,000 with an interest rate of prime plus 1.5%. There was also a total remaining balance on two promissory notes of $1,095,110 due to a shareholder and officer in connection with our acquisitions. The notes bear interests at a rate of 5% and 4.23% per annum, respectively. Our total lease obligations are $ ~~348~~284,~~579~~952 for our Southern California facility, which expires on December 31, 2015.

Income Taxes

Since inception, we have incurred operating losses and, accordingly, have not recorded a provision for federal income taxes for any periods presented. As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, we had net operating loss ~~carryforwards~~carry forwards for federal income tax purposes of $~~262~~155,000. If not utilized, the federal net operating loss ~~carryforwards~~ carry forwards will expire in 2025. Utilization of net operating loss and credit ~~carryforwards~~carry forwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to restrictions contained in the Internal Revenue Code that are applicable if we experience an “ownership change”. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of our net operating loss and tax credit ~~carryforwards~~carry forwards before they can be used.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements or financing activities with special purpose entities.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

Our audited consolidated financial statements are included beginning immediately following the signature page to this report. See Item 15 for a list of the financial statements included herein.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On April 14, 2011, the Board of Directors appointed Wilson Morgan LLP (“Wilson”) as Deltron, Inc’s independent auditors for the 2011 fiscal year, replacing Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation (“Cacciamatta”).

On April 14, 2011, the Company dismissed Cacciamatta as the Company’s independent auditor effective April 14, 2011. The report of Cacciamatta on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the nine-month transition period ended September 30, 2010 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that such report on our consolidated financial statements contained an explanatory paragraph with respect to uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

For the year ended September 30, 2010, and through the date of this Form 8-K, there have been no disagreements with Cacciamatta on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to Cacciamatta’s satisfaction would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in

connection with their report. For the year ended September 30, 2010, and the date of this report, there were no “reportable events” as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

On June 30, 2010, the Board of Directors appointed Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation (“Cacciamatta”) as Deltron, Inc.’s independent auditors for the 2010 fiscal year, replacing Seale & Beers, CPAs (“Seale & Beers”).

On June 30, 2010, the Company dismissed Seale & Beers as the Company’s independent auditor effective June 30, 2010. The report of Seale & Beers on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the quarters ended December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2010, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that such reports on our financial statements contained an explanatory paragraph with respect to uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

For the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and through June 30, 2010, there have been no disagreements with Seale & Beers on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to Seale & Beers’ satisfaction would have caused them to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with their reports. For the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and through June 30, 2010, there were no “reportable events” as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

During the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and through June 30, 2010 (the date Cacciamatta was appointed), the Company did not consult Cacciamatta with respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, or any other matters or reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.

On August 6, 2009, the Board of Directors appointed Seale & Beers, CPAs (“Seal & Beers”) as Deltron, Inc.’s independent auditors for the 2009 fiscal year, replacing Moore & Associates, Chartered (“Moore”).

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Our Disclosure Controls

Under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, Henry Larrucea, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective such that the information relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. With the participation of Henry Larrucea, our Chief Executive and Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based upon such evaluation, our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on the COSO framework criteria. Management identified the following material weaknesses:

external purposes of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. With the participation of Henry Larrucea, our Chief Executive and Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based upon such evaluation, our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011, based on the COSO framework criteria. Management identified the following material weaknesses:

The Company has insufficient internal personnel resources and technical accounting and reporting expertise within the Company’s financial closing and reporting functions;

Due to our small size, the Company did not maintain effective internal controls to assure segregation as the same employee was responsible for initiating and recording of transactions, thereby creating the segregation of duties weakness; and

The Company did not have an independent board of directors for oversight of the Company’s operations and financial reporting process.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Officers’ Certifications

Appearing as exhibits to this Annual Report are “Certifications” of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Certifications are required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Section 302 Certifications”). This section of the Annual Report contains information concerning the Controls Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certification. This information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

1823

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Executive Officers, Directors and Key Employees

Directors serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders; until their successors are elected or appointed and qualified, or until their prior resignation or removal. Officers serve for such terms as determined by our board of directors. Each officer holds office until such officer’s successor is elected or appointed and qualified or until such officer’s earlier resignation or removal. No family relationships exist between any of our present directors and officers.

The following table sets forth certain information, as of January 10, ~~2011~~2012 with respect to our directors and executive officers.

Name and Address	Age	Positions
Henry Larrucea	61	President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Director
Chris Kelliher		Director

Henry Larrucea has held the positions of President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer and a director since February 22, 2010. He is expected to hold said offices/positions until the next annual meeting of our stockholders.

Certain biographical information of our directors and officers is set forth below.

Henry Larrucea

Henry Larrucea, currently the CEO and CFO of Deltron, was one of the original founders of Elasco in 1979 and had been its sole shareholder from 2001 thru 2008. Mr. Larrucea brings over three decades of continuous leadership, management and executive experience in high volume manufacturing environments for consumer recreational markets to Deltron. He is responsible for overall management oversight and strategic long term planning. Mr. Larrucea’s corporate responsibilities include business development, marketing, and acquisition prospect development and management.

He also has expertise in all aspects of product development. Mr. Larrucea is directly involved in new product design and development including concept validation, engineering review and tooling design. He also has extensive experience in production process implementation and maintenance. He has two patents in his name for roller skate and skateboard related inventions. His experience in polyurethane chemistry over 30 years with the company has enabled Elasco to produce many unique polymers for use in such diverse industries as roller skate and skateboard wheels, exercise equipment, bowling pin setter equipment and fire hydrant seals.

Chris Kelliher

Mr. Kelliher started his career in 1982 in his family’s construction business, Keystone Construction in California, learning various skills applicable to the home construction business. He worked there for a number of years until, upon moving to the Hawaiian Islands, he worked as a commercial fisherman for ten years. He then returned to Santa Barbara to manage the family business for a ten year period. Most recently, in the past six years, Mr. Kelliher has worked on the island of Oahu, Hawaii building military housing. He graduated from Lahaina Luna High School on Maui in 1982. He is 46 years old.

Employment Agreements

The Company has an employment agreement with Jeff Bozanic to develop its re-breather technology. The agreement is for three years starting January 1, 2010, at a cost of $10,000 per month. As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, the Company owed Mr. Bozanic $90210,000.

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a period of one year or until such time as their replacements have been elected by our shareholders. The officers of the Company are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their resignation or removal.

Audit Committee

We do not have a standing audit committee, an audit committee financial expert, or any committee or person performing a similar function. We currently have limited working capital and no revenues. Management does not believe that it would be in our best interests at this time to retain independent directors to sit on an audit committee. If we are able to raise sufficient financing in the future, then we will likely seek out and retain independent directors and form an audit, compensation committee and other applicable committees.

Board of Directors

We do not pay our Directors for attending board meetings. However, they are reimbursed for expenses, if any, for attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may designate from among its members an executive committee and one or more other committees but has not done so to date. We do not have a nominating committee or a nominating committee charter. Further, we do not have a policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders. To date this has not been a problem as no security holders have made any such recommendations. Members of the Board of Directors perform all functions that would otherwise be performed by committees. Given the present size of our board it is not practical for us to have committees. If we are able to grow our business and increase our operations we intend to expand the size of our board and allocate responsibilities accordingly.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Our common stock is not registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Accordingly, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are not subject to the beneficial ownership reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Code of Ethics

In 2006 we adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our employees. A copy of our Code of Ethics will be provided to any person requesting same without charge. To request a copy of our Code of Ethics, please make written request to our President c/o Deltron, Inc. at 11377 Markon Drive, Garden Grove, CA 92841.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation paid or accrued by us during the two fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010 to (i) all individuals that served as our principal executive officer or acted in a similar capacity for us at any time during the fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2010~~ 2011; (ii) all individuals that served as our principal financial officer or acted in a similar capacity for us at any time during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010; and (iii) all individuals that served as executive officers of ours at any time during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, that received annual compensation during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 in excess of $100,000.

2025

us at any time during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011; and (iii) all individuals that served as executive officers of ours at any time during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, that received annual compensation during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 in excess of $100,000.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compen-sation ($)	Non- qualified Deferred Compen-sation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
Henry Larrucea, (4)President, Chief Executive Office, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,	2010	0(4)	0	0	0	0	0	$60,000(4)	$60,000
Henry Larrucea,(3) President, Chief Executive Office, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,	2011 2010	0(3) 0(3)	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	$60,000(3) $60,000(3)	$60,000 $60,000
Randall Fernandez,(2) Chief Executive and Financial Officer	2009 2008	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0
Randall Fernandez,(1) Chief Executive and Financial Officer	2009	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Hilda Rivera,(3) Secretary	2009 2008	0 1,000	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 1,000
Hilda Rivera,(2) Secretary	2009	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Shawn Phillips,(1) Chief Executive and Financial Officer	2008	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

(1)

Shawn Phillips served as our President, Chief Executive Officer from inception until June 9, 2008 and served as our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer from October 18, 2007 to September 9, 2008.

(2)

Randall Fernandez has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and as a Director from September 9, 2008, through February 22, 2010

(32)

Hilda Rivera has served as our Secretary from September 9, 2008, and as a Director from inception through February 22, 2010.

(43)

Henry Larrucea was appointed President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Executive Officer, and Treasurer on February 22, 2010. Mr. Larrucea has a total of $60120,000 in accrued but unpaid salary.

Under the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan for Employees, Contractors, Consultants, Advisors, Board Advisors, Board Members and Others (the “Plan”), the Company is authorized to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, or options to purchase shares of common stock. As of the date of this filing, the Company had authorized and issued 80148,000,000 shares under The Plan.

We have no plans in place and have never maintained any plans that provide for the payment of retirement benefits or benefits that will be paid primarily following retirement including, but not limited to, tax qualified deferred benefit plans, supplemental executive retirement plans, tax-qualified deferred contribution plans and nonqualified deferred contribution plans. Similarly, we have no contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, that provide for payments to the named executive officers or any other persons following, or in connection with the resignation, retirement or other termination of a named executive officer, or a change in control of us or a change in a named executive officer’s responsibilities following a change in control.

2126

Compensation of Directors

During the fiscal years ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~2010, there were no arrangements between us and our directors that resulted in our making any payments to our directors for any services provided to us by them as directors.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock known by us as of December 2016, ~~2010~~2011 by:

each person or entity known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;

each of our directors;

each of our executive officers; and

all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

The percentages in the table have been calculated on the basis of treating as outstanding for a particular person, all shares of our common stock outstanding on such date and all shares of our common stock issuable to such holder in the event of exercise of outstanding options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges owned by such person at said date which are exercisable within 60 days of December 2016, ~~2010~~2011. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock owned by them, except to the extent such power may be shared with a spouse.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title of Class (1)	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1)	Percentage Ownership(2)
Acadia LLC 131 E. Oakland Drive Saint Rose, LA 7008	Common	45,000,000	5.93%
Henry Larrucca, President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer, Director 56-141 Maika Way Kaleiwa, HI 96712	Common	30,002,021(3)	89%
Bayou Business 4041 Williams Blvd. Ste A9 #192 Kenner, LA 70065	Common	50,000,000	6.59%
Chris Kelliher, Director	Common	0	0%
Capital Formula PO Box 3923 Carson City, NV 89072	Common	45,000,000	5.93%
All officers and directors as a group (2 persons)		30,002,021	89%
Henry Larrucca, President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer, Director 56-141 Maika Way Kaleiwa, HI 96712	Common	82,021,000	10.81%
All officers and directors as a group (1 person)		82,021,000	10.81%

(1)

As used herein, the term beneficial ownership with respect to a security is defined by Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as consisting of sole or shared voting power (including the power to vote or direct the vote) and/or sole or shared investment power (including the power to dispose or direct the disposition of) with respect to the security through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, including a right to acquire such power(s) during the next 60 days.

(including the power to vote or direct the vote) and/or sole or shared investment power (including the power to dispose or direct the disposition of) with respect to the security through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, including a right to acquire such power(s) during the next 60 days.

(2)

Percentage based upon ~~758~~33,~~478~~641,~~980~~087 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of December 2016, ~~2010 (includes 123,978,980 to be issued)~~2011.

The Company has a number of outstanding Convertible Notes, which can be converted into shares of common stock at the option of the note holder at any time prior to repayment of the note. All notes are currently eligible for conversion, but no note holders have notified the Company that they are exercising that conversion right. Assuming that all outstanding notes are converted into shares at $0.001 per share, which is the guaranteed lowest conversion price, the Company would have issued and outstanding a total of 938,705,281 shares of common stock. The following table reflects those shareholders who, at that time, would own beneficially 5% or more of the Company’s common stock.27

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title of Class (1)	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1)	Percentage Ownership(2)
Acadia LLC 131 E. Oakland Drive Saint Rose, LA 7008	Common	76,183,562	8.12%
Bayou Business 4041 Williams Blvd. Ste A9 #192 Kenner, LA 70065	Common	50,000,000	5.33%
Capital Formula PO Box 3923 Carson City, NV 89072	Common	45,000,000	4.79%
Affinity Advisors, LLC 8 Wayride Circle Bensford, NY 14534	Common	35,000,000	3.73%
Donal Pratt 261 South Timber Creek Drive Amarillo, TX 79118	Common	45,727,397	6.77%
Henry Larrucca, President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer, Director 56-141 Maika Way Kaleiwa, HI 96712	Common	82,021,000	8.74%
All officers and directors as a group (1 person)		82,021,000	8.74%

(3)

30,000,000 shares are subject to 3 year lock up agreement, held for services to be rendered.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and generally includes voting power and/or investment power with respect to the securities held. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of September 30, 2011 and 2010, are deemed outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such options for purposes of computing the number of shares and percentage beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage beneficially owned by any other person. Except as indicated in the footnotes to these tables, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons or entities named have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

The following is the schedule of beneficial ownership as of September 30, 2011:



Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Title of Class (1)	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned⁽¹⁾	Percentage Ownership⁽²⁾
Henry Larrucca, President, CEO, CFO, Treasurer, Director 56-141 Maika Way Kaleiwa, HI 96712	Common	30,002,021	89%
Chris Kelliher	Common	0	0%
All officers and directors as a group (2 person)		30,002,021	89%

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

On November 9, 2010, the Company filed an S8 Registration Statement registering its 2010 Stock Option Plan for Employees and Consultants.

Under the terms of the Plan, a total of 200,000,000 shares of stock or options to purchase common stock can be issued to compensate directors, employees and consultants of the Company for services rendered to the Company.

The terms of the Plan are fully disclosed in the copy of the Plan filed as an exhibit to the S8, but include the following:



	*	price and other terms of issuance of shares under the Plan are to be determined by the Board of Directors, who administer the Plan and who will take into account the market price of the Company’s securities at the date of any agreement to issue shares under the Plan.
	*	shares of common stock issuable under the Plan have the same rights and restrictions as all other issued and issuable shares of common stock of the Company.

As of the date of this filing, the Company issued 80148,000,000 shares to an employee as prepayment for bonus and salaries for the six-month period ended May 7, 2011.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Promissory Notes

Concurrent with the sale of Elasco to Blu Vu, the previous owner~~, Henry~~ ~~Larrucea who is the current officer and director of the Company,~~ agreed to exchange his outstanding demand note, with an outstanding balance of $856,750, for a 10 year note at 5% for $600,000. The difference of $256,750 was recorded as a gain in other income in 2009. Total interest ~~paid or~~ accrued for the shareholder for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 was $22,039 and the balance of the note as of September 30, 2010 was $587,684. Payments have not been made on this note since July 2009. There was $3565,~~804~~180 of accrued interest at September 30, ~~2010~~2011.

~~Mr. Larrucea~~The ~~also~~same party received a promissory note for the stock of Elasco for $540,000. The note is due in monthly payments of $10,000 and bears interest at 4.23%. The note is secured by the stock of Elasco. Total interest ~~paid~~ ~~or accrued~~ for the shareholder for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 was $16,099 and the balance of the note as of September 30, 2010 was $507,~~425~~426. Payments have not been made on this note since August 2009. There is $2546,~~161~~629 of accrued interest at September 30, ~~2010~~2011.

Both of the above notes are currently in default due to non-payment of principal and interest. Upon default the loans become due on demand. ~~Mr.~~The ~~Larrucea~~ noteholder, who is the Company’s president, has granted a waiver which waives the default under the terms of the notes and releases the Company from any liquidated damage provision.

~~The~~ During 2009, the Company ~~has~~issued ~~two~~twelve notes payable to(the ~~shareholders~~“2009 Convertible Notes”) for ~~$20,000~~a ~~and~~total of $19185,500,. These ~~which~~notes ~~it acquired~~are ~~under~~due ~~the~~ranging ~~May~~from 26September 17, 2010, ~~Blu~~to VuMarch ~~asset purchase agreement. These notes are due on May~~ 28, 2011, ~~and~~all ~~bear~~bearing interest at 5.0%. ~~Both~~ These notes payable are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion discount of 70% of the ~~stocks~~stock bid price but in no event shall the conversion price be less than the par value of $0.001. All of these notes are currently in default and are due on demand. During the fiscal year end 2011, the Company converted nine notes payable by issuing 445,486,283 shares of the Company’s common stock. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the balance of these convertible notes payable was $58,500 and $96,167, respectively.

~~The~~ During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company ~~has~~issued ~~nine~~three convertible notes payable to(the ~~shareholders~~“Magna ~~for~~Notes”) atotaling ~~total of~~ $~~136~~77,~~000~~500. These notes ~~are~~bear ~~due~~interest ~~ranging~~at ~~from~~10% ~~September~~and ~~17,~~mature ~~2010,~~at tovarious ~~March~~dates ~~28,~~ranging ~~2011, all~~from ~~bearing~~June ~~interest~~2011 atthrough 5August 2011.~~0%. All~~These ~~nine notes~~ are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion ~~discount~~price of 7050% of the ~~stock~~market ~~bid~~ price ~~but~~(defined inat nothe ~~event~~average ~~shall~~of the lowest three trading prices for the common stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of the conversion ~~price~~notice). beThese ~~less~~notes ~~than~~become convertible at any time during the ~~par~~period ~~value~~beginning on the six month anniversary (the “Initial Conversion Date”) of $0 the date of these notes and end on the later of the maturity dates and the date of payment of a Default Amount, as defined.~~001~~ During year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 233,429,533 shares of common stock to fully convert the notes payable.

24During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company issued four convertible notes payable totaling $30,100. These notes bear interest at 5% and they are due on demand. These notes payable are convertible under same terms as the 2009 Convertible Notes. At September 30, 2011, the balance of these convertible notes payable was $30,100.

AsIn January 2011, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of ~~September~~ 30$50,000. ~~2010~~This note bears interest at 8% and matures on October 24, ~~the~~2011. ~~Company~~This ~~had~~note ~~authorized~~is ~~unissued~~convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock ~~of 9~~under the same terms as the Magna Notes. In July 2011,~~321~~ on the Initial Conversion Date,~~521,020~~ ~~shares~~the Company recorded a derivative liability of approximately $56,000. ~~which~~In isAugust ~~sufficient~~and toSeptember ~~cover~~2011, ~~shares~~the tonote beholder ~~issued~~converted ~~upon conversion~~$46,500 of ~~all~~the convertible ~~notes~~note payable. In connection with this conversion, the

The terms of the convertible notes payable included beneficial conversion feature amounting to $175,500 and was recognized as debt discount, which is to be amortized over the lives of the convertible notes. The Company recorded amortization of such debt discount as interest expense for an amount of $96,167 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, the total net carrying amount of these convertible notes was $96,167.29

Company issued 367,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. At September 30, 2011, the balance of the convertible notes payable was $3,500. The related derivative liability was revalued at $7,000 at September 30, 2011.

In February 2011, the Company purchased technology from an unrelated third party for $3,150,000 by issuing a 5% convertible note payable (the Kaleidoscope Note). The note is due on demand, but not sooner than six months from the date of issuance, and provides for nominal interest at the rate of five (5.0%) percent per annum. The note may be converted into unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share at the Conversion Price, as defined below, in whole, or in part, at any time beginning 180 days after the date of the notes, at the option of the holder. The Conversion Price shall be equal to 30% multiplied by the Variable Conversion Rate which is equal to the average of the three (3) lowest closing bid prices of the Common Stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the date of conversion. The convertible notes payable only become convertible 180 days from issuance, and until the notes payable become convertible, no derivative liability was recorded as a result of the conversion feature. The note became convertible in August 2011 and accordingly, the Company recorded a derivative liability of $5,430,958. At September 30, 2011, the derivative liability was marked-to-market and the balance was $5,432,887. As of September 30, 2011 there is a balance on this note of $3,073,641, plus accrued interest of $94,433.

In August 17, 2011, the Company was notified that $500,000 of the Kaleidoscope Note was assigned to an unrelated third party. The assigned note payable retained the same conversion terms as the Kaleidoscope Note. The Company recorded a derivative liability of $1,167,416. On August 19, 2011 and September 22, 2011, the note holder converted $21,906 and $13,013, respectively, and the Company issued 146,039,992 and 216,880,251 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the balance on this note was $465,081. At September 30, 2011, the derivative liability was marked-to-market and the balance was $1,086,271

In August 23, 2011, the Company was notified that $50,000 of the Kaleidoscope Note was assigned to an unrelated third party. The assigned note payable retained the all the same conversion terms as the Kaleidoscope Note with the exception of the Conversion Price. In connection with the assignment, the Company issued an amendment to the note to change the conversion price to 40% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices of the Common Stock during the ten trading day period prior to the date of conversion. Upon assignment the note became convertible, and, accordingly, the Company recorded a derivative liability of $75,349. On August 29, 2011 and September 16, 2011, the note holder converted $12,500 and $5,000, respectively, and the Company issued 78,125,000 and 83,333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the balance on this note was $32,500. At September 30, 2011, the derivative liability was marked-to-market and the balance was $49,057.

In September 2011, the Company was notified that $250,000 of the Kaleidoscope Note was assigned to an unrelated third party. The assigned note payable retained the all the same conversion terms as the Kaleidoscope Note. Upon assignment the note became convertible, and, accordingly, the Company recorded a derivative liability of $583,810. As of September 30, 2011, the balance on this note was $250,000. At September 30, 2011, the derivative liability was marked-to-market and the balance was $583,915.

The Company issued financial instruments in the form of convertible notes payable. These instruments have variable conversion rates. The conversion features were analyzed for derivative liabilities under GAAP and the Company has determined that they meet the definition of a derivative liability due to the contracts obligations. Derivative instruments shall also be measured at fair value at each reporting period with gains and losses recognized in current earnings. The Company calculated the fair value of these instruments using the Black-Scholes Model due to the short duration of the conversion option (less than

one year). The significant assumptions used in the calculation of the instrument’s fair value are detailed in the table below.

These instruments were not issued with the intent of effectively hedging any future cash flow, fair value of any asset, liability or any net investment in a foreign operation. The instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting, and as such, all future changes in the fair value will be recognized currently in earnings until such time as the instruments are exercised, converted or expire. The following assumptions were used to determine the fair value of the derivative liabilities at September 30, 2011:



Weighted- average volatility	62.2% - 69.4%
Expected dividends	0.0%
Expected term	0.5 year
Risk-free rate	0.06% to 0.07%

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had authorized unissued common stock of 7,336,687,000 shares, which is not sufficient to cover shares to be issued upon conversion of all convertible notes. As a result, the Company recorded a derivative liability in the amount $7,159,130 on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

Current maturities of the notes payable for each of the five years ending September 30 are as follows:


Year		Amount
2012		3,654,823
2013		180,637
2014		118,586
2015		62,355
2016		65,545
Thereafter		178,905
Total	$	4,260,851

Commitments

The Company leases a manufacturing and office facility from a related ~~partnership~~party as an operating lease which expires in 2015. This lease currently requires monthly payments of $5,533 plus related insurance and maintenance. Rental expense under this lease for the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011 was $4966,~~797~~396 all of which was paid to a related party.

Future rental payments required under this operating lease are as follows:

Year Ended


	Year Ended
	September 30,

	2012	$66,396
	2013	66,396
	2014	66,396
	2015	66,396
	2016	19,368

~~September 30,~~31

The Company has an employment agreement with Jeff Bozanic to develop its re-breather technology. The agreement is for three years starting January 1, 2010 at a cost of $10,000 per month. As of September 30, 2011 , the Company owed Mr. Bozanic $210,000.

Prior to the asset purchase agreement between Blu Vu and Deltron, Blu Vu was in negotiations with Radikal, AS (“Radikal”), the owner of intellectual property involving rebreather technology, to purchase its intellectual property involving said technology. At that time, Blu Vu did not own any rebreather technology. No agreement was reached between Blu Vu and Radikal prior to the asset purchase agreement with Deltron. On August 4, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Radikal to purchase its intellectual property involving said technology (the “Radikal Agreement”). The Radikal Agreement requires the Company to pay $ 6635 per unit fee for at least 500 units per year for 2 years,~~396~~ after which the obligation to Radikal will be fulfilled. The first annual payment of $17,500 is due in January 2012.

2012

66,396

2013 66,396

2014

66,396

2015

66,396

did not own any rebreather technology. No agreement was reached between Blu Vu and Radikal prior to the asset purchase agreement with Deltron. On August 4, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Radikal to purchase its intellectual property involving said technology (the “Radikal Agreement”). The Radikal Agreement requires the Company to pay a per unit fee of $35 for at least 500 units per year for 2 years, after which the obligation to Radikal will be fulfilled.

Pursuant to the terms of the Radikal Agreement, Radikal has transferred all U.S. and international patent rights to the Company. If the per unit fee payments are not made when due, Radikal has the right to the return of the intellectual property transferred. Payments for these rights are not required to begin until January 2012.

Director Independence

We are not currently subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that a majority of the board of directors be “independent” and, as a result, we are not at this time required to (and we do not) have our Board of Directors comprised of a majority of “Independent Directors.”

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees.

The aggregate fees billed to us by our principal accountants for services rendered during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, are set forth in the table below:

Fee Category	Fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011	Fiscal year ended September 30, ~~2009~~201
Audit fees (1)	$ 6136,~~250~~200	$ 661,~~500~~250
Audit-related fees (2)	010,000	0
Tax fees (3)	0	0
All other fees (4)	0	0
Total fees	$ 6146,~~250~~200	$ 661,~~500~~250

(1)

Audit fees consist of fees incurred for professional services rendered for the audit of consolidated financial statements, for reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)

Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements, but are not reported under “Audit fees.”

(3)

Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services relating to tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.

(4)

All other fees consist of fees billed for all other services.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Practice.

We do not have an audit committee. Our board of directors performs the function of an audit committee. Section 10A(i) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, prohibits our auditors from performing audit services for us as well as any services not considered to be audit services unless such services are pre-approved by our audit committee or, in cases where no such committee exists, by our board of directors (in lieu of an audit committee) or unless the services meet certain de minimis standards

2733

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following exhibits are included as part of this report:

Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Registrant (1)
3.2		~~By-Laws~~Certificate of ~~Registrant~~Amendment dated 7/6/11(1*)
3.3		By-Laws of Registrant (1)
10.1		Asset Purchase Agreement(3)
14.1		Code of Ethics (2)
21		List of Subsidiaries(*)
23.1		Consent of Larry O’Donnell(3)
23.2		Consent of Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation
31.1/31.2		Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer, pursuant to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (*)
32.1/32.2		Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (*)

(1)

Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 8, 2005, as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s registration statement on the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (file no. 333-130197), which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

(2)

Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 28, 2006, as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2006, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

(3)

The Company filed a Current Report on form 8K on May 28, 2010, reporting the completion of the Asset Purchase Agreement under which the Company acquired the assets and liabilities of Blu Vu Deep Oil & Gas Exploration, Inc. including its ownership of 100% of the outstanding stock of Elasco, Inc. (“Elasco”), and which included the audited consolidated financial statements of Blu Vu, and had attached as Exhibit 10.1 thereto a copy of the Asset Purchase Agreement. The Agreement is incorporated herein by reference. Mr. O’Donnel has provided his consent for the incorporation by reference of his report on the audited consolidated financial statements of Blu Vu.

* Filed herewith.

2834

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: January 13, ~~2011~~2012

DELTRON, INC.

By: /s/ Henry Larrucea

Name:

Henry Larrucea

Title:

President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Henry Larrucea

_________________________

Henry Larrucea

President, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer), Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), Treasurer, and member of the Board of Directors

January 13, 2011

2935

PART IV – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~CACCIAMATTA~~Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

~~ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION~~To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

2601 MAIN STREET, SUITE 580, IRVINE CA 92614

PHONE: (949) 860-9883

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors andStockholders of Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. The consolidated financial statements of Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 were audited by other auditors whose report dated March 31, 2010, on those statements included an explanatory paragraph that describes the accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and that the Company has suffered losses from operations and a accumulated deficit at December 31, 2009 , which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating activities and has a net stockholders’ deficit that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not contain any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

/s/ Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation Irvine, California January 13, 2011

Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
			September 30	December 31
			2010	2009
Assets
	Current Assets:
		Cash	$ 1,852	$ 29,986
		Accounts receivable, net of allowance of doubtful accounts of $2,630	660,395	250,993
		and $7,821 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
		Inventory, net of allowance of obsolescence of $9,795 and $9,000 at
		September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively	332,676	320,786
		Loan receivable	41,000	41,000
		Prepaid expenses and other receivables	19,826	4,632
	Total Current Assets		1,055,749	647,397
	Property and equipment, net		32,239	49,841
Total Assets			$ 1,087,988	$ 697,238
Liabilities and Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity
	Current liabilities
		Line of credit	$ 125,000	$ 125,000
		Bank overdraft	10,506	-
		Accounts payable	452,318	171,274
		Accrued expenses	75,091	28,563
		Income taxes payable	1,600	-
		Accrued expenses - related parties	150,000	-
		Accrued interest - related parties	63,541	23,633
		Convertible notes - related parties, net of note discount of $79,333	96,167	-
		Current portion of long term debt - related party	334,587	207,925
	Total Current Liabilities		1,308,810	556,395
	Notes payable - related party, net of current portion		760,523	887,184
Total Liabilities			2,069,333	1,443,579
Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity
	Common stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000,000 shares
	authorized, 678,478,980 and 123,978,980 shares issued and outstanding
	at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively		678,479	123,979
	Additional paid-in capital		1,418,767	1,847,681
	Accumulated deficit		(3,078,591)	(2,718,001)
		Total Stockholders' (Deficit)	(981,345)	(746,341)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' (Deficit)			$ 1,087,988	$ 697,238
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
		For the nine months ended
		September 30,
		2010	2009
			(Unaudited)
Sales		$2,546,606	$ 1,511,133
Cost of sales		2,269,102	1,364,162
Gross profit		277,504	146,971
Selling, general and administrative expenses		467,036	757,837
Operating income (loss)		(189,532)	(610,866)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(149,564)	(58,948)
Other income		-	12,500
Write off of debt from subsidiary		(21,799)	-
Gain on extinguishment of debt		-	256,750
Gain on disposal of assets		1,905	-
Total other income (expense)		(169,458)	210,302
Loss before provision for income taxes		(358,990)	(400,564)
Provision for income taxes		1,600	-
Net loss		$ (360,590)	$ (400,564)
Per share information
Net loss per common share
	Basic	$ (0.001)	$ (0.008)
	Fully diluted	$ (0.001)	$ (0.008)
Weighted average number of common
	stock outstanding - basic	377,870,921	49,845,698
Weighted average number of common
	stock outstanding - diluted	377,870,921	49,845,698
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY
			Additional
	Common Stock		paid-in	Accumulated
	Number of shares	Amount	Capital	Deficit	Totals
Balance - December 31, 2008	14,403,074	$ 14,403	$ 1,911,235	$ (2,218,137)	$ (292,499)
Recapitalization in reverse acquisition			(624,200)		(624,200)
Issuance of stock for cash	76,031,699	76,032	529,190		605,222
Net loss				(400,564)	(400,564)
Balance - September 30, 2009 (Unaudited)	90,434,773	90,435	1,816,225	(2,618,701)	(712,041)
Issuance of stock for cash	33,544,207	33,544	31,456		65,000
Net loss				(99,299)	(99,299)
Balance - December 31, 2009	123,978,980	123,979	1,847,681	(2,718,001)	(746,341)
Beneficial conversion feature
- convertible notes payable - related parties			175,500		175,500
Recapitalization in reverse acquisition	554,500,000	554,500	(604,414)		(49,914)
Net loss				(360,590)	(360,590)
Balance - September 30, 2010	678,478,980	$ 678,479	$ 1,418,767	$ (3,078,591)	$ (981,345)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
		For the nine months ended
		September 30,
		2010	2009
			(Unaudited)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
	Net loss	$ (360,590)	$ (400,564)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
	in operating activities:
	Depreciation	17,602	3,500
	Bad debt expense	(5,191)
	Inventory obsolescence	795
	Beneficial conversion feature	96,167	-
	Gain on disposal of assets	(1,905)	-
	Write off of debt from subsidiary	21,799
	Gain on extinguishment of debt	-	(256,750)
	(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable	(404,211)	49,743
	(Increase) Decrease in inventory	(12,685)	(65,995)
	(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses and other receivables	(15,194)	(68,480)
	Increase (decrease) in accounts payable	211,237	155,157
	Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses	48,128	(32,012)
	Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses - related parties	150,000	-
	Increase (decrease) in accrued interest - related parties	39,908	-
Net Cash (Used) by Operating Activities		(214,140)	(615,401)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
	Increase in loans receivable	-	-
	Purchase of equipment	-	-
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		-	-
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
	Proceeds from sale of common stock	-	605,222
	Borrowing on line of credit	-	15,000
	Increase in bank overdraft	10,506	-
	Borrowing on related party notes	175,500	-
	Payments on shareholder loans	-	(57,391)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		186,006	562,831
Net (decrease) in Cash		(28,134)	(52,570)
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Period		29,986	78,738
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Period		$ 1,852	$ 26,168
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash paid for interest expense	$ 6,184	$ 52,594
	Cash paid for income taxes	$ -	$ 800
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2011, and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the entity will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the entity has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ WilsonMorgan LLP

Irvine, California

January 13, 2012

F-1


Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


				September 30	September 30
				2011	2010


Assets
	Current Assets:
		Cash		$ 4,496	$ 1,852
		Accounts receivable, net of allowance of doubtful accounts of $2,730		538,456	660,395
			and $2,630 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively
		Inventory, net of allowance of obsolescence of $9,795 at
			September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively	603,513	332,676
		Loan receivable		-	41,000
		Investment in available for sale securities		137,728	-
		Prepaid expenses and other receivables		18,328	19,826
	Total Current Assets			1,302,521	1,055,749


	Property and equipment, net			32,869	32,239

	Intangible asset, net of amortization of $183,750			2,700,000	-

Total Assets				$ 4,035,390	$ 1,087,988


Liabilities and Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity
	Current liabilities
		Line of credit		$ 100,000	$ 125,000
		Bank overdraft		30,002	10,506
		Accounts payable		241,929	452,318
		Accrued expenses		155,925	75,091
		Income taxes payable		-	1,600
		Accrued expenses - related parties		329,000	150,000
		Accrued interest - related parties		111,809	63,541
		Derivative liability		7,159,130	-
		Convertible notes		3,165,741	-
		Convertible notes - related parties, net of note discount of $79,333		-	96,167
		Current portion of long term debt - related party		489,082	334,587
	Total Current Liabilities			11,782,618	1,308,810

	Notes payable - related party, net of current portion			606,028	760,523

Total Liabilities				12,388,646	2,069,333

Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity
	Common stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000,000 shares
	authorized, 2,663,313,000 and 678,478,980 shares issued and outstanding
	at September 30, 2011 and September 30,2010, respectively			2,663,313	678,479
	with no liquidation preferences
	Series A Preferred Stock, no par value, 1 share issued and outstanding
	at September 30, 2011 and 0 outstanding at September 30, 2010			1,000	-
	Additional paid-in capital			-	1,418,767
	Accumulated other comprehensive income			94,442	-
	Accumulated deficit			(11,112,011)	(3,078,591)
		Total Stockholders' (Deficit)		(8,353,256)	(981,345)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' (Deficit)				$ 4,035,390	$ 1,087,988


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2


Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


			For the
			nine months
		Year ended	ended
		September 30	September 30
		2011	2010

Sales		$ 3,504,513	$ 2,546,606

Cost of sales		2,768,256	2,269,102

Gross profit		736,257	277,504

Selling, general and administrative expenses		948,994	467,036

Operating income (loss)		(212,737)	(189,532)

Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(255,467)	(149,564)
Interest income		1,025	-
Write off of debt from subsidiary		-	(21,799)
Derivative expense		(7,159,130)	-
Impairment writedown of intangible asset		(266,250)
Gain on disposal of assets		-	1,905
Total other income (expense)		(7,679,822)	(169,458)

Loss before provision for income taxes		(7,892,559)	(358,990)
Provision for income taxes		1,600	1,600

Net loss		$ (7,894,159)	$ (360,590)

Per share information

Net loss per common share
	Basic	$ (0.0072)	$ (0.001)
	Fully diluted	$ (0.0072)	$ (0.001)

Weighted average number of common
	stock outstanding - basic	1,092,303,685	377,870,921

Weighted average number of common
	stock outstanding - diluted	1,092,303,685	377,870,921

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3


Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS



			For the
			nine months
		Year ended	ended
		September 30	September 30
		2011	2010

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
	Net loss	$ (7,894,159)	$ (360,590)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
	in operating activities:
	Depreciation and amortization	195,150	17,602
	Bad debt expense	-	(5,191)
	Inventory obsolescence	-	795
	Beneficial conversion feature	-	96,167
	Amortization of debt discount	79,333	-
	Gain on disposal of assets	-	(1,905)
	Write off debt from subsidiary	-	21,799
	Stock issued for services	92,800	-
	Impairment expense on intangible asset	266,250	-
	Increase in derivative liability	7,159,130	-
	(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable	121,939	(404,211)
	(Increase) Decrease in inventory	(270,837)	(12,685)
	(Increase) Decrease in prepaid expenses and other receivables	(791)	(15,194)
	Increase (decrease) in accounts payable	(210,389)	211,237
	Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses	(32,001)	48,128
	Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses - related parties	179,000	150,000
	Increase (decrease) in accrued interest - others	109,665	-
	Increase (decrease) in accrued interest - related parties	50,838	39,908

Net Cash (Used) by Operating Activities		(154,072)	(214,140)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
	Purchase of equipment	(12,030)	-

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(12,030)	-

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
	Payment on line of credit	(25,000)	-
	Increase in bank overdraft	19,496	10,506
	Borrowing on convertible notes	174,250	-
	Borrowing on related party notes	-	175,500

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		168,746	186,006

Net increase (decrease) in Cash		2,644	(28,134)

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Period		1,852	29,986

Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Period		$ 4,496	$ 1,852


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
	Cash paid for interest expense	$ 12,962	$ 6,184
	Cash paid for income taxes	$ 3,200	$ -

F-4


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

In November the Company issued 80,000,000 shares of its common stock valued at $60,000
to Elasco's president, $10,000 was recorded as a bonus and $50,000 is prepaid salary which
was expensed over six months beginning mid November 2010.

Issuance of convertible note payable of $3,150,000 for unpatented
rebreather system technology.

In April the Company issued 68,000,000 shares of its common stock valued at $32,800
to Elasco's president and one employee, which was recorded as prepaid salary and
was expensed through July 2011.

On June 30, 2011, the President of the Company converted $1,000 of accrued salary
into 1 share of Series A Preferred Stock.

In September, the Company converted its loan receivable plus accrued interest
into 3,935,091 shares Hawaiian Hospitality Group, Inc.

During the year $426,806 of notes and accrued interest was converted
into 1,913,514,068 shares of the Company's common stock.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5


Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME


							Accumulated
					Additional		Other
	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		paid-in	Accumulated	Comprehensive
	Number of shares	Amount	Number of shares	Amount	Capital	Deficit	Income	Totals


Balance - December 31, 2008			14,403,074	$ 14,403	$ 1,911,235	$ (2,218,137)	$ -	$ (292,499)

Recapitalization in reverse acquisition					(624,200)			(624,200)

Issuance of stock for cash			76,031,699	76,032	529,190			605,222

Net loss						(400,564)		(400,564)

Balance - September 30, 2009 (Unaudited)			90,434,773	90,435	1,816,225	(2,618,701)	-	(712,041)

Issuance of stock for cash			33,544,207	33,544	31,456			65,000

Net loss						(99,299)		(99,299)

Balance - December 31, 2009			123,978,980	123,979	1,847,681	(2,718,001)	-	(746,341)

Beneficial conversion feature
- convertible notes payable - related parties					175,500			175,500

Recapitalization in reverse acquisition			554,500,000	554,500	(604,414)			(49,914)

Net loss						(360,590)		(360,590)

Balance - September 30, 2010	-	-	678,478,980	678,479	1,418,767	(3,078,591)	-	(981,345)

Conversion of notes payable	-	-	1,836,834,020	1,836,834	(1,363,567)	(139,261)	-	334,006

Issuance of common stock for services	-	-	148,000,000	148,000	(55,200)	-	-	92,800

Issuance of preferred stock	1	1,000	-	-	-	-	-	1,000

Net unrealized change in value of
available for sale securities	-	-	-	-	-	-	94,442	94,442

Net loss	-	-	-	-	-	(7,894,159)	-	(7,894,159)

Balance - September 30, 2011	1	$ 1,000	2,663,313,000	$ 2,663,313	-	$ (11,112,011)	$ 94,442	$ (8,353,256)

F-6

Deltron, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, ~~2010~~2011

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICES

Business Description

Deltron, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Nevada Corporation incorporated on September 14, 2005. It is based in Garden Grove, California. Through May 26, 2010 the Company was in the development stage. On May 26, 2010 the Company acquired all of the assets and liabilities of Blu Vu Deep Oil & Gas Exploration, Inc. (“Blu Vu”) including its ownership of 100% of the outstanding stock of Elasco, Inc. (“Elasco”) by issuance of 123,978,980 restricted shares of its common stock.

Elasco was incorporated on October 25, 1979 in the state of California. Its principal business is manufacturing and selling of open cast molded polyurethane elastomer products such as skateboard, roller skate, and industrial wheels.

After the acquisition of Blu Vu’s assets, the Company is engaged in potential manufacture and mass-market of proprietary breathing equipment developed specifically for the oil and gas, mining and safety industries, and military and recreational divers. The technology is still under development. Production and manufacture of the equipment (primarily Closed-Circuit Rebreathers “CCRs” and components used for all types of rebreathers) will be produced by the wholly-owned subsidiary, Elasco, while the Company provides financial, operational and technical expertise.

On August 4, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Radikal, AS (“Radikal”), the owner of intellectual property involving rebreather technology, to purchase its intellectual property involving said technology (the “Radikal Agreement”). The Radikal Agreement requires the Company to pay a per unit fee of $35 per unit for at least 500 units per year for 2 years, after which the obligation to Radikal will be fulfilled. The Company is required to ~~begin making~~make ~~payments~~the first annual payment of $17,500 in January 2012.

Pursuant to the terms of the Radikal Agreement, Radikal ~~has transferred~~will transfer all U.S. and international patent rights to the Company. The transfer of those rights was completed during the period ended September 30, 2010. However, if the per unit fee payments are not made when due, Radikal has the right to the return of the intellectual property transferred. To date the Company has not sold any units, but is required to make the first annual payment in January 2012.

The acquisition of Blu Vu’s assets and Elasco, Inc. by the Company has been accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. The reverse recapitalization was the acquisition of a private operating company into a non-operating public shell corporation with nominal net assets and is treated as a capital transaction, rather than a business combination. As a result no goodwill is recorded. In this situation Deltron is the legal acquirer because it acquired all of the assets and liabilities of Blu Vu and 100% of the stock of Elasco and Elasco is the legal acquiree because its equity interests were acquired. However, Elasco is the acquirer and Deltron is the acquiree for accounting purposes. The pre-acquisition financial statements of Elasco are treated as the historical financial statements of the consolidated companies except that the equity section and earnings per share have been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse recapitalization.

historical financial statements of the consolidated companies except that the equity section and earnings per share have been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse recapitalization.

Change in Fiscal Year End

After the reverse recapitalization, the Company adopted the fiscal year end of Deltron, the former shell company, of September 30 for financial reporting purposes on Form 10-K. Because Elasco is considered the accounting acquirer and the predecessor entity for SEC reporting purposes in the acquisition, this change in fiscal year end is deemed to be a change in Elasco’s fiscal year end. These consolidated financial statements represent the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 and the results of the Company’s operations and cash flows for the transition period from January 1, 2010 (the day after the end of Elasco’s previous fiscal year) to September 30, 2010 (the end of the Company’s new fiscal year). ~~The results of the Company’s operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are unaudited and are presented for comparison purpose.~~

Principles of Consolidations

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its whollyF-~~owned subsidiary, Elasco. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.~~ 7

Use of Estimates

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all short term ~~debt securities~~investments ~~purchases~~ with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company deposits its cash with major financial institutions and may at times exceed the federally insured limit of $250,000. At September 30, ~~2010~~2011 cash did not exceed the federally insured limit. The Company believes that the risk of loss is minimal. To date, the Company has not experienced any losses related to cash deposits with financial institutions.

related to cash deposits with financial institutions. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had an overdraft of $10,506 and cash balance of $1,852.

Accounts Receivable

The Company estimates the collectability of customer receivables on an ongoing basis by reviewing past-due invoices and assessing the current creditworthiness of each customer. Allowances are provided for specific receivables deemed to be at risk for collection. ~~As of September 30, 2010, accounts receivable amounted to $660,395, net of allowance of doubtful accounts of $2,630.~~

Inventory

Property and Equipment and Depreciation Policy

Investments

The Company routinely classifies certain equity securities as available for sale and measure them at market value (fair value). Changes in unrealized gains or losses are recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of shareholders' equity.

Intangible asset

F-8

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Income Taxes

The Company follows the provisions of uncertain tax positions as addressed in ASC 740-10-65-1. The Company recognized ~~approximately~~ no increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company has no tax position as of September 30, ~~2010~~2011 for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about such timing of such deductibility. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. No such interest or penalties were recognized during the periods presented. The Company had no accruals for interest and penalties at September 30, ~~2010~~2011. The Company’s utilization of any net operating loss carry forward may be unlikely as a result of its continued losses.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments


	·	Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.


	·	Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.


	·	Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value.

AsDuring of the year end September 30, ~~2010~~2011, the Company ~~also~~issued ~~owed~~convertible ~~two~~ notes tototaling ~~Henry Larrucea~~$3,165,741. ~~a shareholder~~As ~~and officer~~ of ~~the~~September ~~Company.~~30, ~~The~~2011, ~~total~~the carrying ~~amount~~value of these convertible notes was $13,~~095~~165,~~110~~741. The Company used level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology and the fair value was determined to be approximately $1,223,000 using cash flows discounted at relevant market interest rates in effect at the period close since there is no observable market price.

~~As of September 30, 2010 the Company did not identify any other assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with ASC 820~~F-~~10.~~9

methodology and the fair value was determined to be approximately $3,165,741 using cash flows discounted at relevant market interest rates in effect at year end since there is no observable market price.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company also owed two notes to Henry Larrucea, a shareholder and officer of the Company. The total carrying amount of these notes was $1,095,110. The Company used level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology and the fair value was determined to be approximately $1,223,000 using cash flows discounted at relevant market interest rates in effect at year end since there is no observable market price.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company tested its intangible asset (see Note 6) for impairment using a discounted cash flow and it was determined that the net book value exceeded the fair value. The Company used level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology and the fair value was determined to be approximately $2,700,000 using revelant discount rates, and royalty rates in effect at year end since there are no observable market price.

On September 22, 2011, the Company exercised its conversion option on a loan receivable due from a third party. In connection with the conversion, the Company received shares of common stock in a publicly traded company which the Company has classified as available for sale. As of September 30, 2011 the Company measured them at market value (fair value). Changes in unrealized gains or losses are recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of shareholder’s equity. The Company used level 1 inputs for its valuation methodology and the fair value was determined to be approximately $138,000 as of September 30, 2011.

As of September 30, 2011 the Company did not identify any other assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with ASC 820-10.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues through its consolidated ~~wholly~~fully owned subsidiary. Revenues are recognized from product sales upon shipping, at which time title passes to the customer provided that there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed and determinable and collectability is deemed probable.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed when incurred.

Share-Based Compensation

Segment Information

Based on the criteria established by ASC Topic 280 “Segment report” (formerly SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”), the Company uses the management approach for determining which, if any, of its products and services, locations, customers or management structures constitute a reportable business segment. The management approach designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of any reportable segments. As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, the Company mainly operated in two principal segments – development of the rebreather system and sales of polyurethane elastomer products. The rebreather system is still under development and has not generated any revenue. The following tables present summarized information by segments:

		Nine Months Ended September 30,
			2010		2009 (Unaudited)
Revenues
	Rebreather	$	-	$	-
	Polyurethane		2,546,606		1,511,133
		$	2,546,606	$	1,511,133
Cost of sales
	Rebreather	$	-	$	-
	Polyurethane		2,269,102		1,364,162
		$	2,269,102	$	1,364,162
Gross Profit
	Rebreather	$	-	$	-
	Polyurethane		277,504		146,971
		$	277,504	$	146,971

F-10

					Nine months
			Year ended		ended
			September 30		September 30
			2011		2010
Revenues
	Rebreather	$	-	$	-
	Polyurethane		3,504,513		2,546,606
		$	3,504,513	$	2,546,606
Cost of sales
	Rebreather	$	-	$	-
	Polyurethane		2,768,256		2,269,102
		$	2,768,256	$	2,269,102
Gross Profit
	Rebreather	$	-	$	-
	Polyurethane		736,257		277,504
		$	736,257	$	277,504
Selling, general and administrative expenses
	Rebreather	$	~~192~~642,~~878~~434	$	~~480~~192,~~662~~878
	Polyurethane		~~274~~306,~~158~~560		~~277~~274,~~175~~458
		$	~~467~~948,~~036~~994	$	~~757~~467,~~837~~336
Loss from operations
	Rebreather	$	(~~192~~642,~~878~~434)	$	(~~480~~192,~~662~~878)
	Polyurethane		3429,~~346~~697		~~(130~~3,~~204)~~346
		$	(~~189~~212,~~532~~737)	$	(~~610~~189,~~866~~532)
			September 30,		~~December~~September 3130,
			2010		2009
			2011		2010
Total Assets
	Rebreather	$	422,~~852~~670,650	$	4442,~~763~~852
	Polyurethane		12,~~045~~270,~~136~~298		~~652~~1,~~475~~045,136
		$	13,~~087~~940,~~988~~948	$	~~697~~1,~~238~~087,988

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

ASC 220-10 (formerly, SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income) (“ASC 220-10”), requires disclosure of all components of comprehensive income (loss) on an annual and interim basis. Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) is the same as its reported net income (loss) for the ~~periods~~year ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~2009~~ the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

F-11

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The Company has adopted ASC 260-10, “Earnings per Share,” (EPS) which requires presentation of basic and diluted EPS on the face of the income statement for all entities with complex capital structures and requires a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation. In the accompanying consolidated financial statements, basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. For the year ended September 30, 2011 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company has excluded all common equivalent shares from the calculation of diluted net loss per share as such securities are anti-dilutive.

Significant Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~May 2009~~December 2010, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board ("~~FASB") issued ~~Accounting Standards~~ASU ~~Codification Topic~~ No. ~~855~~2010-13, ~~Subsequent~~Compensation—Stock ~~Events.~~Compensation ~~This~~(Topic ~~guidance establishes~~718), ~~general~~Effect ~~standards~~ of ~~accounting~~Denominating ~~for~~the ~~and,~~Exercise ~~disclosure~~Price of, ~~events~~a ~~that occur~~Share-Based ~~after~~Payment ~~the~~Award ~~balance~~in ~~sheet~~the ~~date~~Currency ~~but~~of ~~before~~the ~~financial~~Market ~~statements~~in ~~are~~Which ~~issued~~the ~~or are~~Underlying ~~available~~Equity toSecurity ~~be issued~~Trades. ItThis ~~sets~~ASU ~~forth~~provides ~~(i)~~amendments ~~the~~to ~~period~~Topic ~~after~~718 ~~the~~to ~~balance~~clarify ~~sheet date~~that ~~during~~an ~~which~~employee ~~management~~share-based ofpayment aaward ~~reporting~~with ~~entity~~an ~~should~~exercise ~~evaluate~~price ~~events~~denominated ~~or transactions~~in ~~that~~the ~~may~~currency ~~occur~~of ~~for~~a ~~potential~~market ~~recognition~~in orwhich ~~disclosure~~a insubstantial ~~the financial~~portion ~~statements,~~of ~~(ii)~~ the ~~circumstances~~entity’s ~~under~~equity ~~which~~securities antrades ~~entity~~ should ~~recognize~~ ~~events~~not orbe ~~transactions~~considered ~~occurring~~to ~~after~~contain ~~the~~a ~~balance~~condition ~~sheet~~that ~~date~~is innot ~~its financial~~a ~~statements~~market, ~~and~~performance, ~~(iii)~~or ~~the~~service ~~disclosures~~condition. ~~that~~Therefore, an entity ~~should~~would ~~make~~not ~~about events~~classify orsuch ~~transactions~~an ~~that~~award ~~occurred~~as ~~after~~a ~~the~~liability ~~balance~~if ~~sheet~~it ~~date~~otherwise qualifies as equity. ~~The~~This ~~guidance~~ ASU is effective for ~~interim~~fiscal oryears, ~~annual~~and ~~financial~~interim periods ~~ending~~within those fiscal years, beginning on or after ~~June~~December 15, ~~2009 and~~2010. ~~was~~The ~~adopted~~Company ~~with~~is noevaluating ~~material~~the ~~effect~~impact onof the ~~Company's~~adoption ~~consolidated~~of ~~financial statements.~~this ASU.

In ~~June 2009~~December 2010, the FASB issued ~~Accounting~~ASU ~~Standards Codification Topic~~ No. ~~105~~2010-1028, ~~The FASB~~Intangibles ~~Accounting~~– ~~Standards~~Goodwill ~~Codification~~ and ~~the~~Other ~~Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles~~ (~~"ASC~~Topic ~~105-10"~~350)., ~~This~~When ~~guidance~~to ~~establishes~~Perform ~~the~~Step ~~FASB Accounting~~2 ~~Standards Codification (the "Codification") as the source~~ of ~~authoritative~~ ~~accounting principles recognized by~~ the ~~FASB~~Goodwill toImpairment beTest ~~applied~~for ~~by nongovernmental~~Reporting ~~entities~~Units inwith ~~the~~Zero ~~preparation~~or ofNegative ~~financial~~Carrying ~~statements in conformity with U~~Amounts.S. ~~GAAP. Rules~~The ~~and~~ASU ~~interpretive~~modifies ~~releases~~Step 1 of the ~~SEC under~~goodwill ~~authority~~impairment oftest ~~federal~~for ~~securities~~reporting ~~laws~~units ~~are~~with ~~also~~zero ~~sources~~or ofnegative ~~authoritative U~~carrying amounts.S. ~~GAAP~~As ~~for~~a ~~SEC~~result, ~~registrants.~~current ~~All~~GAAP ~~guidance~~will ~~contained~~be inimproved ~~the~~by ~~Codification carries~~eliminating an ~~equal~~entity’s ~~level~~ability ofto ~~authority.~~assert ~~The~~that ~~Codification~~a ~~superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and~~ reporting ~~standards.~~unit ~~All~~is ~~other~~not ~~non-grandfathered,~~required ~~non-SEC accounting~~to ~~literature~~perform ~~not~~Step ~~included~~2 inbecause the ~~Codification~~carrying isamount ~~non-authoritative.~~of ~~The FASB will not issue new standards in~~ the ~~form~~reporting ofunit ~~Statements,~~is ~~FASB~~zero ~~Staff Positions~~ or ~~Emerging~~negative ~~Issues~~despite ~~Task~~the ~~Force~~existence ~~Abstracts.~~of ~~Instead,~~qualitative itfactors ~~will~~that ~~issue Accounting~~indicate ~~Standards~~the ~~Updates~~goodwill ~~("ASUs").~~is ~~The~~more ~~FASB~~likely ~~will~~than not ~~consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right~~impaired. ~~ASUs~~As ~~will~~a ~~serve only to update the Codification~~result, ~~provide~~goodwill ~~background~~impairments ~~information~~may ~~about~~be ~~the~~reported ~~guidance~~sooner ~~and~~than ~~provide~~under ~~the basis~~current ~~for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification~~practice. ~~References~~This ~~made~~ASU ~~to FASB guidance throughout this document have been updated for the Codification. ASC 105-10~~ is effective for ~~the~~fiscal ~~financial~~years, ~~statements~~and ~~issued~~interim ~~for~~periods ~~interim and~~within ~~annual~~those ~~periods~~years, ~~ending~~beginning after ~~September~~December 15, ~~2009~~2010. The ~~adoption~~Company ~~will have~~is noevaluating ~~material~~the impact onof the ~~Company’s~~adoption ~~consolidated~~of ~~financial~~this ~~statements but will require that interim and annual filings include references to the Codification~~ASU.

In ~~June 2009~~April 2011, the FASB issued ~~ASC~~ASU ~~810~~No. 2011-~~10-30~~02, ~~Variable~~Receivables ~~Interest Entities~~ (~~formerly~~Topic ~~FASB 167~~310), ~~regarding~~A ~~when~~Creditor’s ~~and~~Determination ~~how~~of toWhether ~~determine,~~a orRestructuring ~~re-determine~~Is a Trouble Debt Restructuring. Under the amendments of this ASU, ~~whether~~in anevaluating ~~entity~~whether is a ~~variable~~restructuring ~~interest~~constitutes ~~entity.~~a Introubled ~~addition~~debt restructuring, ~~FASB~~a ~~No. 167~~creditor ~~replaces~~must ~~FIN~~separately ~~46R’s quantitative~~conclude ~~approach~~that ~~for~~both ~~determining~~of ~~who~~the ~~has~~following aexist: ~~controlling~~1) ~~financial~~the ~~interest in~~restructuring constitutes a ~~variable~~concession, ~~interest~~2) ~~entity~~the ~~with~~debtor ais ~~qualitative~~experiencing ~~approach~~financial difficulties. ~~Furthermore,~~The ~~ASC 810-10-30~~amendments ~~requires~~also ~~ongoing~~clarify ~~assessments~~the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether anit ~~entity~~has isgranted ~~the~~a ~~primary beneficiary~~concession and on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a ~~variable~~debtor ~~interest~~is ~~entity~~experiencing financial difficulties. ~~ASC~~This ~~810-10-30~~ASU is effective ~~beginning January 1,~~for ~~2010~~interim and ~~the~~annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In ~~October~~ ~~2009~~May 2011, the FASB issued ~~Accounting~~ASU ~~Standards~~No. ~~Codification~~2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic No820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. ~~605, Multiple-Deliverable~~GAAP ~~Revenue~~and ~~Arrangements~~IFRSs. ~~This~~Under ~~guidance~~the ~~establishes~~amendments aof ~~selling price~~this ~~hierarchy~~ASU ~~for~~will ~~determining~~result ~~the~~in ~~selling~~common ~~price~~fair ofvalue ameasurement ~~deliverable~~and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and ~~expands~~ IFRSs. Consequently, the ~~disclosures~~amendments ~~required~~change ~~for~~the ~~multiple-deliverable~~wording ~~revenue~~used ~~arrangements~~to describe many of the requirements in U.S. ~~This guidance~~GAAP isfor ~~effective~~measuring fair value and for ~~revenue~~disclosing ~~arrangements~~information ~~that~~about ~~are~~fair ~~entered~~value ~~into~~measurements. orThis ~~are materially~~ASU ~~modified~~is ineffective ~~fiscal~~during ~~years~~interim ~~beginning~~and onannual orperiods beginning after ~~June~~December 15, ~~2010, with early adoption permitted~~2011. The ~~adoption~~Company ~~did~~is ~~not~~evaluating ~~have~~the ~~material~~ impact onof the ~~Company’s~~ ~~consolidated~~adoption ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~this ASU.

In ~~January~~ ~~2010~~June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2010~~2011-0605, ~~regarding~~Comprehensive ~~fair~~Income ~~value~~(Topic ~~measurements and~~220), ~~disclosures~~Presentation ~~and~~of ~~improvement~~Comprehensive inIncome. Under the ~~disclosure~~amendments ~~about~~of ~~fair~~this ~~value~~ASU, ~~measurements. This~~an ~~ASU~~entity has the option to present the ~~requires additional disclosures~~total ~~regarding~~of ~~significant transfers~~comprehensive inincome, ~~and~~the ~~out~~components of ~~Levels~~net 1income, and 2the components of ~~fair~~other ~~value measurements, including~~comprehensive income either in a ~~description~~single continuous statement of ~~the reasons~~ comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for ~~the transfers~~ other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. ~~Further~~ In a single continuous statement, ~~this~~the ~~ASU~~entity ~~requires~~is ~~additional~~required ~~disclosures~~to present the components of net income and total net income, the components of other comprehensive income and a total for other comprehensive income, along with the ~~activity~~ total of comprehensive income in ~~Level~~that 3statement. ~~fair~~In ~~value~~the ~~measurements,~~

requiring presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.F-12

~~In February~~two-statement ~~2010~~approach, ~~the~~an ~~FASB~~entity ~~issued~~is ~~Accounting~~required ~~Standards~~to ~~Update~~present ~~No.~~components ~~2010-09~~of ~~(“ASU 2010-09”)~~net asincome ~~amendments~~and tototal ~~certain~~net ~~recognition~~income ~~and~~in ~~disclosure~~the ~~requirements~~statement of net income. The ~~amendments~~ ~~remove~~statement ~~the~~of ~~requirement~~other ~~for~~comprehensive anincome ~~SEC~~should ~~filer~~immediately tofollow ~~disclose~~the astatement ~~date~~of innet ~~both issued~~income and ~~revised~~include ~~financial~~the ~~statements.~~components ~~Revised~~of ~~financial~~other ~~statements~~comprehensive ~~include financial~~income ~~statements~~and ~~revised as~~ a ~~result~~total offor ~~either~~other ~~correction~~comprehensive ofincome, analong ~~error~~with ~~or retrospective~~a ~~application~~total offor ~~U.S.~~comprehensive ~~GAAP~~income. ~~Those~~This ~~amendments~~ASU ~~remove~~is ~~potential conflicts~~effective ~~with~~for ~~the~~fiscal ~~SEC’s~~years, ~~literature.~~and ~~All~~interim ofperiods ~~the~~within ~~amendments~~those inyears, ~~ASU~~beginning ~~2010-09~~after ~~were effective~~December ~~upon~~15, ~~issuance for interim and annual periods~~2011. The ~~adoption~~Company ~~of ASU 2010-09 did~~is ~~not~~evaluating ~~have~~the ~~a material~~ impact onof the ~~Company’s~~adoption ~~consolidated financial~~of ~~statements~~this ASU.

In ~~March~~ ~~2010~~September 2011, the FASB issued ~~Accounting~~ASU ~~Standards~~No. ~~Update~~2011-08, Intangible – Goodwill and Other (~~“ASU”~~Topic 350), NoTesting Goodwill for Impairment. Under ~~2010-11~~the amendments of this ASU, ~~which~~ an entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is ~~included~~more inlikely than not that the ~~Codification~~fair ~~under~~value ~~ASC~~of ~~815,~~a ~~“Derivatives~~reporting ~~and~~unit ~~Hedging” (“ASC~~is ~~815”)~~less than its carrying amount. ~~This~~ ~~update~~If, ~~clarifies~~after assessing the ~~type~~totality of ~~embedded~~events ~~credit derivative~~or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is ~~exempt~~less ~~from~~than ~~embedded~~its ~~derivative~~carrying ~~bifurcation requirements~~amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. ~~Only~~ However, if an ~~embedded~~entity ~~credit~~concludes ~~derivative~~otherwise, ~~that~~then it is ~~related~~required to perform the ~~subordination~~first step of ~~one~~the ~~financial~~two-step ~~instrument~~impairment totest ~~another~~by ~~qualifies~~calculating ~~for~~ the ~~exemption. This~~ ~~guidance~~fair isvalue ~~effective~~of ~~for~~the ~~interim~~reporting unit and ~~annual reporting~~comparing ~~periods~~the ~~beginning~~fair ~~January~~value 1,with ~~2010. The~~the ~~adoption~~carrying amount of ~~this standard~~the ~~did~~reporting ~~not~~unit, ~~have~~as adescribed ~~material~~in ~~impact~~paragraph on350-20-35-4. If the ~~Company’s~~carrying ~~consolidated~~amount ~~financial statements.~~of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the

entity is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any, as described in paragraph 350-20-35-9. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. An entity may resume performing the qualitative assessment in any

subsequent period. This ASU is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $~~253~~10,~~061~~480,097, an accumulated deficit of $311,~~078~~112,~~591~~011, and a net loss of $~~360~~7,~~590~~894,159 for the ~~nine~~year ~~months~~ then ended. The Company’s continued operating losses and limited capital raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. For the ~~nine months~~year ended September 30, ~~2010~~2011, the Company was able to pay its obligations to vendors from fund raised through issuance of convertible notes to certain shareholders. The Company intends on financing its future development activities from the same sources, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. If adequate funds are not available, it would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations and may ultimately cause discontinuance of operations.

development activities from the same sources, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. If adequate funds are not available, it would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations and may ultimately cause discontinuance of operations.

NOTE 3 – INVENTORY

Inventory consisted of the following:

September 30, 2010


	September 30,
	2011	2010
Raw material	$220,127	$232,962
Work in process	193,145	41,513
Finished goods	200,036	67,996
	613,108	342,471
Less allowance for obsolete inventory	(9,795)	(9,795)
	$603,513	$332,676

~~December 31,~~NOTE ~~2009~~4 – INVESTMENT IN AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES

~~Raw material~~The Company had a loan receivable from an unrelated party for $41,000 plus interest. In September 2011, the Company received shares in a publicly traded company which we classified as available for sale and measured them at market value (fair value). Changes in unrealized gains or losses are recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of shareholder’s equity. The Company used level 1 inputs for its valuation methodology and the fair value was determined to be approximately $138,000, net of income taxes of $0.

~~$232,962~~F-13

~~$219,372~~NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Work in process

41,513

31,210

Finished goods

67,996

79,204

342,471

329,786

Less allowance for obsolete inventory

(9,795)

(9,000)

$332,676

$320,786

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

September 30, 2010


	September 30
	2011	2010
Machinery & equipment	$237,377	$237,377
Tooling	151,168	139,138
Computer equipment	97,465	94,383
Leasehold improvements	38,720	38,720
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment	13,951	17,033
	538,681	526,651
Less accumulated depreciation	505,812	494,412
	$ 32,869	$ 32,239

~~December 31~~For the periods ended September 30, ~~2009~~2011 and 2010, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $9,877 and 17,602, respectively.

~~Machinery &~~NOTE ~~equipment~~6 – INTANGIBLE ASSET

In February 2011, the Company issued a convertible note payable (see Note 9) to acquire an unpatented rebreather technology from an unrelated party and recorded an intangible asset of $~~237~~3,~~377~~150,000. The Company intends to manufacture and sell these systems for use in non-pressurized sport and military subs. The useful life of the intangible asset is ten years. Amortization expense was $183,750 for the year ended September 30, 2011 which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five years ending September 30 is $286,726 per year, $1,433,630 in total.

This asset was tested for impairment in September 2011 using a discounted cash flow and it was determined that the net book value exceeded the fair value. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $~~237~~266,~~377~~250 at September 30, 2011in the rebreather segment of its operations.

~~Tooling~~NOTE 7 – LINE OF CREDIT

~~139~~The Company has entered into a line of credit agreement with a bank. The maximum borrowing is $125,~~138~~000. Interest is calculated at prime plus 1.5% (with an interest rate floor of 6.5%) and is paid monthly. The line of credit agreement matures on December 5, 2011 at which time the entire principal balance is due. It has been extended until February 5, 2012.The line of credit is personally guaranteed by the Trust of the former owner of Elasco, who is the president of the Company. The outstanding balance at September 30, 2011 is $100,000 and December 31, 2010 was $125,000 at 6.5%.

~~139,138~~NOTE 8 – NOTES PAYABLE - SHAREHOLDER

~~Computer equipment~~Concurrent with the sale of Elasco to Blu Vu, the previous owner agreed to exchange his outstanding demand note, with an outstanding balance of $856,750, for a 10 year note at 5% for $600,000. The difference of $256,750 was recorded as a gain in other income in 2009. Total interest accrued for the shareholder for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 was $22,039 and the balance of the note as of September 30, 2010 was $587,684. Payments have not been made on this note since July 2009. There was $65,180 of accrued interest at September 30, 2011.

94The same party received a promissory note for the stock of Elasco for $540,~~383~~000. The note is due in monthly payments of $10,000 and bears interest at 4.23%. The note is secured by the stock of Elasco. Total interest for the shareholder for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 was $16,099 and the balance of the note as of September 30, 2010 was $507,426. Payments have not been made on this note since August 2009. There is $46,629 of accrued interest at September 30, 2011.

~~94,383~~F-14

~~Leasehold improvements~~Both of the above notes are currently in default due to non-payment of principal and interest. Upon default the loans become due on demand. The noteholder, who is the Company’s president, has granted a waiver which waives the default under the terms of the notes and releases the Company from any liquidated damage provision.

~~38,720~~NOTE 9 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

38During 2009,~~720~~ the Company issued twelve notes payable (the “2009 Convertible Notes”) for a total of $185,500. These notes are due ranging from September 17, 2010, to March 28, 2011, all bearing interest at 5.0%. These notes payable are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion discount of 70% of the stock bid price but in no event shall the conversion price be less than the par value of $0.001. All of these notes are currently in default and are due on demand. During the fiscal year end 2011, the Company converted nine notes payable by issuing 445,486,283 shares of the Company’s common stock. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the balance of these convertible notes payable was $58,500 and $96,167, respectively.

~~Furniture~~During the quarter ended December 31, ~~fixtures~~ 2010, the Company issued three convertible notes payable (the “Magna Notes”) totaling $77,500. These notes bear interest at 10% and ~~office~~mature ~~equipment~~at various dates ranging from June 2011 through August 2011.These are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion price of 50% of the market price (defined at the average of the lowest three trading prices for the common stock during the ten trading day period ending one trading day prior to the date of the conversion notice). These notes become convertible at any time during the period beginning on the six month anniversary (the “Initial Conversion Date”) of the date of these notes and end on the later of the maturity dates and the date of payment of a Default Amount, as defined. During year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 233,429,533 shares of common stock to fully convert the notes payable.

17During the quarter ended June 30,~~033~~ 2011, the Company issued four convertible notes payable totaling $30,100. These notes bear interest at 5% and they are due on demand. These notes payable are convertible under same terms as the 2009 Convertible Notes. At September 30, 2011, the balance of these convertible notes payable was $30,100.

17In January 2011,~~033~~ the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $50,000. This note bears interest at 8% and matures on October 24, 2011. This note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock under the same terms as the Magna Notes. In July 2011, on the Initial Conversion Date, the Company recorded a derivative liability of approximately $56,000. In August and September 2011, the note holder converted $46,500 of the convertible note payable. In connection with this conversion, the Company issued 367,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. At September 30, 2011, the balance of the convertible notes payable was $3,500. The related derivative liability was revalued at $7,000 at September 30, 2011.

~~526~~In February 2011,~~651~~ the Company purchased technology from an unrelated third party for $3,150,000 by issuing a 5% convertible note payable (the Kaleidoscope Note). The note is due on demand, but not sooner than six months from the date of issuance, and provides for nominal interest at the rate of five (5.0%) percent per annum. The note may be converted into unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share at the Conversion Price, as defined below, in whole, or in part, at any time beginning 180 days after the date of the notes, at the option of the holder. The Conversion Price shall be equal to 30% multiplied by the Variable Conversion Rate which is equal to the average of the three (3) lowest closing bid prices of the Common Stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the date of conversion. The convertible notes payable only become convertible 180 days from issuance, and until the notes payable become convertible, no derivative liability was recorded as a result of the conversion feature. The note became convertible in August 2011 and accordingly, the Company recorded a derivative liability of $5,430,958. At September 30, 2011, the derivative liability was marked-to-market and the balance was $5,432,887. As of September 30, 2011 there is a balance on this note of $3,073,641, plus accrued interest of $94,433.

~~526~~In August 17,~~651~~ 2011, the Company was notified that $500,000 of the Kaleidoscope Note was assigned to an unrelated third party. The assigned note payable retained the same conversion terms as the Kaleidoscope Note. The Company recorded a derivative liability of $1,167,416. On August 19, 2011 and September 22, 2011, the note holder converted $21,906 and $13,013, respectively, and the Company issued 146,039,992 and 216,880,251 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the balance on this note was $465,081. At September 30, 2011, the derivative liability was marked-to-market and the balance was $1,086,271

~~Less accumulated depreciation~~F-15

~~494~~In August 23,~~412 476~~ 2011,~~810~~ the Company was notified that $50,000 of the Kaleidoscope Note was assigned to an unrelated third party. The assigned note payable retained the all the same conversion terms as the Kaleidoscope Note with the exception of the Conversion Price. In connection with the assignment, the Company issued an amendment to the note to change the conversion price to 40% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices of the Common Stock during the ten trading day period prior to the date of conversion. Upon assignment the note became convertible, and, accordingly, the Company recorded a derivative liability of $75,349. On August 29, 2011 and September 16, 2011, the note holder converted $12,500 and $5,000, respectively, and the Company issued 78,125,000 and 83,333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the balance on this note was $32,500. At September 30, 2011, the derivative liability was marked-to-market and the balance was $49,057.

In September 2011, the Company was notified that $ 32250,~~239~~000 of the Kaleidoscope Note was assigned to an unrelated third party. The assigned note payable retained the all the same conversion terms as the Kaleidoscope Note. Upon assignment the note became convertible, and, accordingly, the Company recorded a derivative liability of $583,810. As of September 30, 2011, the balance on this note was $250,000. At September 30, 2011, the derivative liability was marked-to-market and the balance was $583,915.

~~$ 49,841~~The Company issued financial instruments in the form of convertible notes payable. These instruments have variable conversion rates. The conversion features were analyzed for derivative liabilities under GAAP and the Company has determined that they meet the definition of a derivative liability due to the contracts obligations. Derivative instruments shall also be measured at fair value at each reporting period with gains and losses recognized in current earnings. The Company calculated the fair value of these instruments using the Black-Scholes Model due to the short duration of the conversion option (less than one year). The significant assumptions used in the calculation of the instrument’s fair value are detailed in the table below.

~~For~~These instruments were not issued with the ~~nine~~intent ~~months ended~~of ~~September~~effectively 30hedging any future cash flow, ~~2010~~fair value of any asset, liability or any net investment in a foreign operation. The instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting, and as such, all future changes in the ~~Company~~fair ~~recorded~~value ~~depreciation~~will ~~expense~~be ~~of $17~~recognized currently in earnings until such time as the instruments are exercised,~~602~~ converted or expire. The following assumptions were used to determine the fair value of the derivative liabilities at September 30, 2011:

NOTE 5 – LINE OF CREDIT



Weighted- average volatility	62.2% - 69.4%
Expected dividends	0.0%
Expected term	0.5 year
Risk-free rate	0.06% to 0.07%

~~The Company~~As ~~has entered into a line~~ of ~~credit~~September ~~agreement~~30, ~~with a bank. The maximum borrowing is $125~~2011,~~000. Interest~~ isthe ~~calculated~~Company athad ~~prime~~authorized ~~plus~~unissued ~~1.5% (with~~common anstock ~~interest rate floor~~ of ~~6.5%)~~7,336,687,000 ~~and is paid monthly. The agreement expires December 1~~shares, ~~2010 at~~ which ~~time the entire principal balance~~ is ~~due. The~~not ~~line~~sufficient ofto ~~credit~~cover isshares ~~personally~~to ~~guaranteed~~be byissued ~~the~~upon ~~Trust~~conversion of ~~the~~all ~~former owner~~convertible ofnotes. ~~Elasco,~~As ~~who~~a isresult, the ~~officer and director of the~~ Company~~. The outstanding~~ ~~balance~~recorded ata ~~both~~derivative ~~September~~liability ~~30,~~in ~~2010~~the ~~and~~amount ~~December 31, 2009 was~~ $~~125~~7,~~000~~159,130 aton ~~6.5%. The Company renewed~~ the ~~agreement~~accompanying ~~with~~consolidated ~~the~~balance ~~bank on December 1, 2010~~sheet. ~~See~~ ~~Note 11 for details.~~

NOTE 6 – NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

Concurrent with the sale of Elasco to Blu Vu, the previous owner, Henry Larrucea who is the current officer and director of the Company, agreed to exchange his outstanding demand note, with an outstanding balance of $856,750, for a 10 year note at 5% for $600,000. The difference of $256,750 was recorded as a gain in other income in 2009. Total interest paid or accrued for the shareholder for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 was $22,039 and the balance of the note as of September 30, 2010 was $587,684. Payments have not been made on this note since July 2009. There was $35,804 of accrued interest at September 30, 2010.

Mr. Larrucea received a promissory note for the stock of Elasco for $540,000. The note is due in monthly payments of $10,000 and bears interest at 4.23%. The note is secured by the stock of Elasco. Total interest paid or accrued for the shareholder for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 was $16,099 and the balance of the note as of September 30, 2010 was $507,425. Payments have not been made on this note since August 2009. There is $25,161 of accrued interest at September 30, 2010.

Both of the above notes are currently in default due to non-payment of principal and interest. Upon default the loans become due on demand. Mr. Larrucea has granted a waiver which waives the default under the terms of the notes and releases the Company from any liquidated damage provision.

The Company has two notes payable to shareholders for $20,000 and $19,500, which it acquired under the May 26, 2010 Blu Vu asset purchase agreement. These notes are due on May 28, 2011 and bear interest at 5.0%. Both notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion discount of 70% of the stocks bid price but in no event shall the conversion price be less than the par value of $0.001.

The Company has nine notes payable to shareholders for a total of $136,000. These notes are due ranging from September 17, 2010, to March 28, 2011, all bearing interest at 5.0%. All nine notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion discount of 70% of the stock bid price but in no event shall the conversion price be less than the par value of $0.001.

As of September 30, 2010, the Company had authorized unissued common stock of 9,321,521,020 shares, which is sufficient to cover shares to be issued upon conversion of all convertible notes.

Current maturities of the notes payable for each of the five years ending September 30 are as follows:

Year		Amount
2011	$	510,088
2012		3,654,823
2012		163,779
2013		180,637
2013		171,275
2014		118,586
2014		118,656
2015		62,355
Thereafter		244,457
2016		65,545
Total	$	1,270,610
Thereafter		178,905
Total	$	4,260,851

NOTE 7 10 – CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

A material part of the Company’s account receivables is outstanding with five customers. The amount owed by these customers at September 30, 2010, was $518,092, approximately 78% of the Company’s receivables. Sales to the top five customers represented 82% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The amount owed by these customers at December 31, 2009, was $176,498, approximately 70% of the Company’s receivables. Sales to these customers represented 73% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Sales are concentrated in the western United States. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company purchased approximately $698,000 and $410,000, respectively, of raw material from five suppliers, which represented 59% and 62%, respectively, of the Company’s total purchases. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, amounts owed to these five suppliers were approximately $186,000 and $30,000, which represented 41% and 17% , respectively, of the total accounts payable. F-16

~~NOTE~~A ~~8 –~~material ~~COMMITMENTS~~part –of ~~RELATED~~the ~~PARTIES~~Company’s account receivables is outstanding with five customers. The amount owed by these customers at September 30, 2011, was $541,187, approximately 90% of the Company’s receivables. Sales to the top five customers represented 76% of total sales for year ended September 30, 2011. The amount owed by these customers at September 30, 2010 was $518,092, approximately 78% of the Company’s receivables. Sales to the top five customers represented 82% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Sales are concentrated in the western United States. For the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company purchased approximately $752,000 of its raw material from five suppliers, which represented 50% of the Company’s total purchases. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the Company purchased approximately $698,000 of raw material from five suppliers, which represented 59% of the Company’s total purchases. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010 amounts owed to these five suppliers was approximately $96,000 and $186,000, respectively, which represented 65% and 41%, respectively, of the total accounts payable.

~~The Company~~NOTE ~~leases~~11 a– manufacturing and office facility from a related partnership as an operating lease which expires in 2015. This lease currently requires monthly payments of $5,533 plus related insurance and maintenance. Rental expense under this lease for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $49,797 all of which was paid to a related party.COMMITMENTS

The Company leases a manufacturing and office facility from a related party as an operating lease which expires in 2015. This lease currently requires monthly payments of $5,533 plus related insurance and maintenance. Rental expense under this lease for the year ended September 30, 2011 was $66,396 all of which was paid to a related party.

Future rental payments required under this operating lease are as follows:

Year Ended


	Year Ended
	September 30,

	2012	$66,396
	2013	66,396
	2014	66,396
	2015	66,396
	2016	19,368

~~2011~~ Prior to the asset purchase agreement between Blu Vu and Deltron, Blu Vu was in negotiations with Radikal, AS (“Radikal”), the owner of intellectual property involving rebreather technology, to purchase its intellectual property involving said technology. At that time, Blu Vu did not own any rebreather technology. No agreement was reached between Blu Vu and Radikal prior to the asset purchase agreement with Deltron. On August 4, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Radikal to purchase its intellectual property involving said technology (the “Radikal Agreement”). The Radikal Agreement requires the Company to pay $35 per unit fee for at least 500 units per year for 2 years, after which the obligation to Radikal will be fulfilled. The first annual payment of $17,500 is due in January 2012.

$ 66,396

2012

66,396

2013 66,396

2014

66,396

2015

66,396

Prior to the asset purchase agreement between Blu Vu and Deltron, Blu Vu was in negotiations with Radikal, AS (“Radikal”), the owner of intellectual property involving rebreather technology, to purchase its intellectual property involving said technology. At that time, Blu Vu did not own any rebreather technology. No agreement was reached between Blu Vu and Radikal prior to the asset purchase agreement with Deltron. On August 4, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Radikal to purchase its intellectual property involving said technology (the “Radikal Agreement”). The Radikal Agreement requires the Company to pay a per unit fee of $35 for at least 500 units per year for 2 years, after which the obligation to Radikal will be fulfilled.

NOTE 9 12 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

At December 31, 2009 the Company had 5,545,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001, outstanding. On March 10, 2010, the Corporation’s Board of Directors approved a one hundred-for-one (100:1) forward split of the Corporation’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The forward split was for shareholders of record as of the close of business on Friday, April 30, 2010, and the market effective date for the reverse stock split was May 3, 2010. As a result of the forward stock split, for every one share of the Corporation’s old common stock shareholders received ninety-nine additional shares of the Corporation’s new common stock. Immediately following the forward split, the number of shares of the Corporation’s outstanding issued common stock was increased from 5,545,000 shares to approximately 554,500,000 shares, par value $.001.

On May 26, 2010, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Blu Vu Deep Oil & Gas Exploration, Inc., a Nevada corporation. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of Blu Vu, consisting of, but not limited to, all stock of Blu Vu’s subsidiary, Elasco, Inc., certain intellectual properties, computer programs and software, contracts, claims and accounts receivables associated with the operation of Blu Vu’s business of developing underwater deep breathing apparatus. In consideration of the sale of the assets of Blu Vu, the shareholders of Blu Vu, received restricted common shares of the Company totaling 123,978,980. No other considerations were exchanged in the transaction.

~~As of September 30, 2010, the number of common shares issued and outstanding was 678,478,980.~~ F-17

~~NOTE~~In November 2010, the Company issued 80,000,000 shares to Elasco’s president as a bonus of $10 –,000 ~~INCOME~~and ~~TAXES~~prepaid salary of $50,000 over the next six months under an Employee Stock Incentive Program (ESIP). In April and May, the Company issued 40,000,000 shares to an employee of Elasco and 28,000,000 shares to Elasco’s president as prepaid salary of $16,000 and $16,800 through July 2011 under an Employee Stock Incentive Program (ESIP). .

~~The Company~~As ~~recognizes~~of ~~deferred~~September ~~income~~30, ~~tax~~2011, ~~liabilities and assets for~~ the ~~expected future~~number ~~tax consequences~~ of ~~events~~common ~~that~~shares ~~have~~issued ~~been~~and ~~recognized~~outstanding inwas ~~the financial statements or tax returns.~~ 2,663,313,000

~~Under this~~NOTE ~~method,~~13 ~~deferred~~– ~~tax~~INCOME liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.TAXES

The ~~Company~~ ~~incurred~~Internal noRevenue ~~income~~Code ~~taxes~~of ~~for~~1986, ~~the~~as ~~periods~~amended, ~~ended~~imposes ~~September~~substantial ~~30,~~restrictions ~~2010~~on ~~and 2009~~the ~~except~~utilization ~~for~~of ~~$800~~net ~~each~~operating ~~year~~losses ~~for~~in ~~state~~the ~~franchise~~event ~~taxes. For~~of ~~the~~an ~~nine months~~“ownership ~~ended~~change” ~~September~~of a 30corporation. Accordingly, ~~2010~~a ~~the~~company’s ~~Company~~ability ~~had~~to ~~incurred~~use anet ~~loss~~operating ~~and~~losses ~~had~~may ~~state income~~be ~~taxes~~limited ~~payable~~as ofprescribed ~~$1,600~~under atInternal ~~September~~Revenue ~~30,~~Code ~~2010~~Section 382 (“IRC Section 382”). No Events ~~income~~which ~~tax benefit~~may ~~was~~cause ~~recognized~~limitations asin the amount of ~~September~~the ~~30,~~net ~~2010~~operating ~~and~~losses ~~December~~that 31the company may use in any one year include, ~~2009~~but asare not limited to, a ~~result~~ cumulative ownership change of ~~the~~more ~~valuation~~than ~~allowance~~50% ~~applied~~over toa ~~deferred~~three-year ~~tax~~period. There ~~assets,~~have ~~due~~been totransactions that have changed the ~~uncertainty~~ ofCompany’s ~~recognizing~~ownership ~~any~~structure ~~future~~since inception ~~tax~~that ~~benefits~~may ~~from~~have resulted in one or more ownership changes as defined by the ~~NOL~~Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company incurred no income taxes for the periods ended September 30, 2011 or 2010 except for $1,600 each year for state franchise taxes. For the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had incurred losses and had state income taxes payable of $0 and $1,600, respectively. No income tax benefit was recognized as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 as a result of the valuation allowance applied to deferred tax assets, due to the uncertainty of recognizing any future tax benefits from the deferred tax assets.

The income tax expense consists of the following:

State tax expense				$ 1,600
			2011		2010
	Income tax expense			$ 1,600
Current
	Federal	$	-	$	-
	State		1,600		1,600
	Total		1,600		1,600
Deferred
	Federal		(1,716,500 )		(112,500)
	State		(676,200 )		(32,900)
	Total		(2,392,700)		(145,400)
	Less Change in Valuation Allowance		2,392,700		145,400
Total			-		-
Total Income Tax Expense		$	1,600	$	1,600

The Company’s net loss of approximately $170,000 will be carried forward to offset future taxable income. As of September 30, 2010, the Company’s federal NOL is approximately $262,000 expiring in 2025, and its California NOL is approximately $171,000 expiring 2015. The Company has book/tax differences of approximately $188,000 comprised of accrued officer’s compensation of $60,000, accrued consulting of $90,000 and accrued interest of 38,000. These differences result in a deferred tax asset of approximately $64,000. The federal and California NOLs result in a deferred tax asset of approximately $81,400. Due to the uncertainty of recognizing any future benefit, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $145,400 to offset the deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance increased $122,900 from September 30, 2009, as a result of the uncertainty of utilizing the deferred tax assets. F-18

The ~~deferred~~Company’s net tax ~~asset~~ ~~comprised~~loss ~~the~~of ~~following~~approximately at$10,000 will be carried forward to offset future taxable income. As of September 30, ~~2010:~~2011, the Company’s federal and California NOLs is are approximately $155,000, expiring in 2025, and its California NOL is expiring 2015, respectively.

Deferred tax asset:
	Federal benefit of NOL carryover	$ 65,500
	California benefit of NOL carryover	15,900
	Accrued officer's compensation	20,400
	Accrued consulting	30,600
	Accrued interest	13,000
	Total	145,400
	Valuation allowance	(145,400)
	Net deferred tax asset	$ -

Given the Company’s history of net operating losses, management has determined that it is more-likely-than-not the Company will not be able to realize the tax benefit of the carry forwards. Current standards require that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2011 and 2010. Upon the attainment of taxable income by the Company, management will assess the likelihood of realizing the tax benefit associated with the use of the carry forwards and will recognize a deferred tax asset at that time. For the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the valuation allowance increased by $2,392,700 and $145,400, respectively.

~~NOTE~~Significant ~~11 –~~components ~~SUBSEQUENT~~of ~~EVENTS~~the Company’s deferred income tax assets are as follows:


			September 30,
			2011		2010
Deferred tax assets
	Net operating loss carry forwards	$	53,000	$	81,400
	Accrued expenses		149,000		64,000
	Derivative liability		2,423,000		-
	Impairment on intangible asset		90,100		-

	Net deferred tax asset		2,715,100		145,400
	Less valuation allowance		(2,538,100)		(145,400)
			177,000		-

Deferred tax liabilities
	State tax		(177,000)		-
		$	-	$	-

Reconciliation of the effective income tax rate to the U.S. statutory rate is as follows:


	September 30
	2011	2010
Tax benefit at the U.S. statutory income tax	(25.0)%	(25.0)%
State income tax net of federal benefit	(6.1)%	(6.1)%
Change in valuation allowance	30.30%	31.1%
Other	1.3%	0.0%
Effective tax rate	0.0%	0.0%

The Company adopted authoritative guidance in accordance with GAAP, which addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under the current accounting guidelines, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Current accounting guidelines also provide guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and require increased disclosures. At the date of adoption, and as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 the Company

F-19

does not have a liability for unrecognized tax benefits.

NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In October 2011, the Corporation’s Board of Directors approved a one for one-thousand (1:1,000) reverse split of the Corporation’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The reverse split was for shareholders, and the market effective date for the reverse stock split was October 7, 2011. As a result of the reverse stock split, for every one-thousand shares of the Corporation’s old common stock shareholders received one share of the Corporation’s new common stock. Immediately following the forward split, the number of shares of the Corporation’s outstanding issued common stock was decreased from 2,591,993,048 to approximately 2,591,993 shares, par value $0.001.

In October 2011, the Company borrowed $43,750 from an unrelated party by issuing a 5% convertible promissory note. The note is due on demand, but not sooner than six months from the date of issuance, and provides for nominal interest at the rate of five (5.0%) percent per annum. The note may be converted into unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share at the Conversion Price, as defined below, in whole, or in part, at any time beginning 180 days after the date of the notes, at the option of the holder. The Conversion Price shall be equal to 30% multiplied by the Variable Conversion Rate which is equal to the average of the three (3) lowest closing bid prices of the Common Stock during the ten (10) trading day period prior to the date of conversion.

On December 12, 2011, the Company issued 30,000,000 shares of common stock to it CEO in payment of services to be rendered. The shares are subject to a three (3) year lock-up agreement with the Company, during which time the share certificate is held in escrow and the shares cannot be sold, transferred or otherwise encumbered. If the CEO does not remain in his position, or a similar position with the Company for three (3) years, the shares will be returned to treasury and cancelled. None of the shares are available to the CEO for the three (3) year period.

The Company has evaluated subsequent event for purposes of recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date of issuance of its financial statements.

~~Subsequent to year end, the Company issued 80,000,000 shares to Elasco’s president as a bonus and prepaid salary over the next six months under an Employee Stock Incentive Program (ESIP).~~ F-20

In October through December 2010, the Company issued convertible notes for $35,000, $30,000 and $12,500, respectively to one investor. These notes are due in six months and bear interest at 10%. All three notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion discount of 50% of the stock bid price, with no floor.

On December 1, 2010, the Company renewed its line of credit agreement with a principal amount of $100,000, which is due on December 5, 2011. The interest rate is subject to change based on changes in the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate but under no circumstances will the interest rate be less than 6.5% per annum.

Filing Compare · Deltron, Inc.