UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File No. 000-29895

SMART-TEK SOLUTIONS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	90-0749326
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1100 Quail Street, Newport Beach, CA 92660
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

(858) 798-1644
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [ ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer,” and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Check whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes [ ] No [ ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity as of the latest practicable date:
As of May 15, 2012, there were 49,212,123 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, outstanding.

Smart-tek Solutions Inc.

Period Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

CONTENTS	PAGES

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income	3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5-14

Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

		March 31,			December 31,
		2012			2011

Assets

Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	132,492
Accounts receivable, net		1,746,134			1,626,583
Due from related parties		2,571,973			2,739,220
Prepaid expenses and deposits		8,592			52,152
Total current assets		4,326,699			4,550,447

Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		49,429			55,007

Prepaid workers compensation		3,580,001			3,440,000

Goodwill		476,356			476,356

	$	8,432,485		$	8,521,810

Liabilities

Current liabilities

Bank overdraft	$	93,829		$	-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,549,118			1,268,378
Accrued payroll taxes		13,356,557			11,958,012
Accrued workers compensation		835,594			1,055,980
Payable to related parties		687,219			609,022
Note payable to related party		500,000			500,000
Total current liability		17,022,317			15,391,392

Other long-term liabilities		-			35,000

Total liabilities		17,022,317			15,426,392

Commitments and contingencies		-			-

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Preferred stock: $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, zero shares of Class A preferred issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31,2011		-			-
Common stock: $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 49,212,123 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		49,212			49,212
Additional paid in capital		7,271,945			7,271,945
Accumulated deficit		(15,910,989	)		(14,225,739	)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(8,589,832	)		(6,904,582	)

	$	8,432,485		$	8,521,810

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
2

Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
For the Months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

		2012			2011

Revenue (gross billings of $25,763 and $15,661 million, less worksite employee payroll cost of $19,282 million and $11,439 million respectively)	$	6,480,991		$	4,221,806

Cost of revenue and service delivery		5,548,484			2,949,291

Gross profit		932,507			1,272,515

Selling, general and administrative expenses		2,552,919			898,831

Operating income (loss)		(1,620,412	)		373,684

Interest and Tax Penalties		(64,838	)		(10,330	)

Total other expense		(64,838	)		( 10,330	)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		(1,685,250	)		363,354

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,685,250	)	$	363,354

Earnings per share of common stock, basic and diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding, basic and diluted		49,212,123			24,314,124

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3

Smart-tek Solutions Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

		2012			2011


Operating Activities

Net income (loss)	$	(1,685,250	)	$	363,354
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash
provided in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		5,578			4,703
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		(119,551	)		1,085,580
Due from related party		167,247			(1,042,329	)
Proceeds from related party		78,197			-
Prepaid expenses and deposits		43,560			170,990
Prepaid worker compensation expense		(140,000	)		-
Bank overdraft		93,829			-
Accrued workers compensation expense		(220,386	)		-
Payroll taxes payable		1,398,544			-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		280,740			(596,560	)

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		(97,492	)		(14,262	)

Investing activities

Purchase of equipment		-			(38,882	)
Payment of long-term payable		(35,000	)		-

Net cash used in investing activities		(35,000	)		(38,882	)

Financing activities
		-			-

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		-			-

Net increase (decrease) in cash from continuing operations		(132,492	)		(53,144	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		132,492			781.720

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	0		$	728,576

Supplemental cash flow information

Interest paid	$	64,853		$	10,330
Income taxes payable	$	-		$	-

Non cash supplemental information	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited but reflect, in the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“STS” or the “Company”) as of March 31, 2012, its consolidated results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, and the consolidated cash flows for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company owns 100% of the outstanding stock in its subsidiaries. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the audited consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Because all the disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States are not included, these interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. The results for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, or any other period. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

1. Summary of significant accounting policies

Nature of operations, basis of financial statement presentation

Smart-tek Solutions Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 22, 1995.

In July 2005, the Company changed its name from Royce Biomedical Inc. to Smart-tek Solutions Inc. (“STS” or the “Company”) to better reflect its new business activities.

In March 2005, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent to acquire Smart-tek Communications, Inc. (“SCI”) a British Columbia based security design and installation contractor. Pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement executed in April 2005, SCI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

On July 1, 2010, the Company completed the disposition of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary SCI to its president and founder Perry Law.

On February 11, 2009, Smart-tek Automated Services Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was incorporated in the State of Nevada. On June 17, 2009, Brian Bonar was contracted to use his expertise and contacts in the PEO area for the benefit of Smart-tek Automated Services, Inc. Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. provides integrated and cost-effective management solutions in the area of human resources for public and private companies. Though Smart-tek Automated Services Inc., provides mainly professional employer organization (“PEO”) services, it is equipped to provide temporary staffing services as well. In a PEO co-employment contract, the Company becomes the employer of record for client company employees’ for tax and insurance purposes. The client company continues to direct the employees’ day-to-day activities, and charges a service fee for providing services. 100% of Smart-tek Automated Services Inc.’s operations are in the United States.

On October 1, 2011 Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. purchased the assets and brand name of Solvis Medical from American Marine LLC dba AMS Outsourcing a Montana limited liability corporation. Solvis Medical provides medical staffing services to hospitals, medical clinics, surgical centers, skilled nursing facilities, and nursing care to patients in their homes.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the following significant accounting policies:

Liquidity and Management Plans

At March 31, 2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $0, a working capital deficit of approximately $12.7 million and an accumulated deficit of $15.9 million. Due to these circumstances, the Company’s management monitors and attempts to minimize, to the extent possible, all cash expenditures. The Company plans to seek additional funds, equity or debt, to support its operations. The Company’s management believes it will generate sufficient additional revenues to meet its working capital needs in future periods.

Going Concern

The Company incurred a net operation loss of $1.7 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 and a net operating loss of approximately $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, and has incurred accumulated losses totalling approximately $15.9 million through March 31, 2012. Because of these conditions, the Company will require additional working capital to continue operations and develop its business. The Company intends to raise additional working capital either through private placements, public offerings and/or bank financing, and continues to strive to increase its revenues each year.

There are no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve a level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or obtain additional financing through private placements, public offerings and/or bank financing necessary to support the Company’s working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from any private placements, public offerings and/or bank financing are insufficient the Company will have to raise additional working capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to the Company. If adequate working capital is not available, the Company may not continue its operations or execute its business plan.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Smart-tek Solutions Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. Significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Specific areas, among others, requiring the application of management’s estimates and judgment includes assumptions pertaining to credit worthiness of customers, interest rates, useful lives of assets, future cost trends, tax strategies, and other external market and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from estimates and assumptions made.

Cash and equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and bank deposits. For financial reporting purposes, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses related to this concentration of risk. At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company did not have any deposits in excess of federally insured limits.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivables are recorded at net realizable value consisting of the carrying amount less an allowance for uncollectible accounts, as needed. The Company uses the allowance method to account for uncollectible accounts receivable balances. Under the allowance method, if needed, an estimate of uncollectible customer balances is made based upon specific account balances that are considered uncollectible. Factors used to establish an allowance include the credit quality and payment history of the customer. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $ 150,000 and zero as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company regularly discounts selected trade accounts receivable from clients to a commercial factoring company. Under the terms of the factoring agreement, the factor remits the invoiced amounts to the Company less a portion for reserves. When paid in full, the factor remits the reserve amount less a portion for processing fees and interest. Accounts are factored with recourse as to credit losses. The Company reflects a liability to the factoring company on its Balance Sheet for the uncollected amounts that remain uncollected until the factored invoices have been paid in full.

Workers compensation insurance

The Company maintains reserves in the form of prepaid cash deposits for known workers' compensation claims which are made up of estimated collateral required to pay claims and estimated expenses to settle the claims. The collateral amounts are determined by the insurance carrier and are not recoverable by the Company until all claims related to a policy period are settled.

The prepaid cash deposits will not be recoverable in the near term and accordingly, they are classified as a long term asset. The Company reserves prepaid cash deposits for case reserves at a rate of 150%. Case reserves are an estimate for the costs of the claim, administrative costs as well as legal costs. These estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments to liabilities are reflected in current operating results as they become known.

Concentration of credit risk

Credit risk arises from the potential that a counterpart will fail to perform its obligations. The Company is exposed to credit risk related to its accounts receivable. The Company’s receivables are comprised of a number of debtors which minimizes the concentration of credit risk.

Equipment

Equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated using accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from 3 to 5 years. The Company reviews the carrying value of long-term assets to be held and used when events and circumstances warrant such a review. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs is charged to operations as incurred. Major overhaul that extends the useful life of existing assets is capitalized. When equipment is retired or disposed, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated and the resulting profit or loss is recognized in income.

Income taxes

The Company recognizes consolidated deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.

Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and for carry forwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes professional employment organizations (PEO) revenues when each periodic payroll is delivered. The Company’s net PEO revenues and cost of PEO revenues do not include the payroll cost of its worksite employees. Instead, PEO revenues and cost of PEO revenues are comprised of all other costs related to its worksite employees, such as payroll taxes, employee benefit plan premiums and workers’ compensation insurance.

PEO revenues also include professional service fees, which are primarily computed as a percentage of client payroll or on a per check basis. Revenues related to the Solvis Medical business are recognized when the services are invoiced to the client.

In determining the pricing of the markup component of its billings, the Company takes into consideration its estimates of the costs directly associated with its worksite employees, including payroll taxes, benefits and workers’ compensation costs, plus an acceptable gross profit margin. As a result, the Company’s operating results are significantly impacted by the Company’s ability to accurately estimate, control and manage its direct costs relative to the revenues derived from the markup component of the Company’s gross billings.

Goodwill

The Company’s goodwill was derived from the acquisition of Solvis Medical assets. Goodwill is the excess of cost over the fair market value of net tangible assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but tested for impairment on an annual basis or if certain circumstances indicate a possible impairment may exist.

Share-based compensation

The Company measures the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant date fair-value of the awards. Fair value is typically the market price of the shares on the date of issuance. Costs are recognized as compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards. Under this method, the Company began recognizing compensation cost for equity-based compensation for all new or modified grants after the date of adoption. The pro-forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition.

Earnings (loss) per share

The Basic net earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) available to common stock outstanding during the period. Net earnings (loss) per share on a diluted basis is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is determined to be the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company follows a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, are observable either directly or indirectly.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs based on the Company's assumptions.

The Company is required to use observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort.

At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash, accounts and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and accounts payable to related parties approximate fair value because of their short maturity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-28 “Intangibles— Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts” (“ASU 2010-28”). Under ASU 2010- 28, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit is zero or negative, an entity must assess whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists. To make that determination, an entity should consider whether there are adverse qualitative factors that could impact the amount of goodwill, including those listed in ASC 350-20-35-30. As a result of the new guidance, an entity can no longer assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative, despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate goodwill is more likely than not impaired. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010, with early adoption prohibited. Adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” This new guidance requires the components of net income and other comprehensive income to be presented in one continuous statement, referred to as the statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate consecutive statements. The new guidance also eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of stockholders’ equity. While the new guidance changes the presentation of comprehensive income, there are no changes to the components that are recognized in net income or other comprehensive income under current accounting guidance. ASU 2011-05 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011; however, the Company has adopted this guidance as of the end of its 2011 reporting period as permitted by the guidance.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The ASU simplifies how entities, both public and non-public, test goodwill for impairment. The revised standard allows an entity to first assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform step one of the two-step annual goodwill impairment test. An entity is required to perform step one only if the entity concludes that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, a likelihood of more than 50 percent. An entity can choose to perform the qualitative assessment on none, some, or all of its reporting units. Moreover, an entity can bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to step one of the impairment test, and then perform the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The revised standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe this guidance will have any impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.

2. Equipment

												December 31,
						March 31, 2012						2011
				Accumulated		Net Book				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Depreciation		Value		Cost		Depreciation		Value


Computer equipment & software	$	55,008	$	22,763	$	32,245	$	55,008	$	20,574	$	34,434
Office furniture & equipment		19,334		8,849		10,485		19,334		7,397		11,937

Automobile		23,242		16,543		6,699		23,242		14,606		8,636

	$	97,584	$	48,155	$	49,429	$	97,584	$	42,577	$	55,007

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment was $5,578 and $4,703 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively.

3. Equity

At March 31, 2012, the Company is authorized to issue:

1. 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.

2. 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.

Common Stock

At March 31, 2012, there are 49,212,123 shares of common stock outstanding.

On June 16, 2011 the Board of Directors approved the Smart-tek Solutions 2011 Stock Compensation Plan (“2011 Plan”) authorizing the sale or award of up to an additional 10,000,000 shares and/or options of the Company's Common Stock. The Stock Option Plan expires in August 20, 2013. No stock options were issued during the three months ended March 31, 2012 or during 2011. During 2011, 3,000,000 shares were issued to a consultant as compensation for services rendered. The cost of these shares was measured at the market value of $.075 per share or $225,000 and expensed at the time of issuance. The value in excess of Par Value was recognized as Additional Paid In Capital. 7,000,000 shares and/or options of the Company’s common stock are available for issuance under the 2011 Plan as of March 31, 2012.

Preferred Shares

There are no preferred shares issued or outstanding.

4. Earnings (loss) per share

		March 31,			March 31,
		2012			2011

Net income (loss)	$	(1,685,250	)	$	363,354

Weighted number of shares outstanding		49,212,123			24,314,123

Income(loss) per share	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01

5. Acquisitions

On October 1, 2011, Smart-tek Solutions, Inc. acquired the assets and the brand name of Solvis Medical from American Marine LLC dba AMS Outsourcing, a Montana limited liability corporation.

The purchase price was $535,000 consisting of a $35,000 cash payment at closing plus a $500,000 promissory note that matures on September 31, 2012 and bears a 6% simple interest rate. The purchase price will be revalued at the one and two year time periods based on performance as follows:

• Year 2012 – At December 31, 2012, the acquired net assets will be revalued at four (4) times pretax earnings. A one year promissory note at 6% interest will be issued for the net change between the original value and the 2012 revalue.

• Year 2013 – At December 31, 2013, the acquired net assets will be revalued at four (4) times pretax earnings. A one year promissory note at 6% interest will be issued for the net change between the revalue as of December 31, 2012 and the revalue at December 31, 2013

The Company recorded the purchase price as follows:

Prepaid expenses	$	52,303
Furniture &
fixtures	$	6,341
Goodwill	$	476,536
Total	$	535,000

Management does not believe that the calculation of 4 times earnings will exceed the purchase price of $535,000.

6. Short Term Note Payable

At December 31, 2011, the Company has an outstanding note payable in the amount of $500,000 payable to an affiliated company relating to the acquisition of Solvis Medical assets. The loan is unsecured, bears a simple 6% interest and matures at September 30, 2012.

7. Related Party Transactions

During the three month period ended March 31, 2012, Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary) paid $300,035 in management salaries to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer which included commissions of $106,246 and benefits of $5,328. Such Costs have been reflected in the accompanying statement of operations.

From time to time, Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. purchases additional services from related parties to take advantage of economies of scale as opposed to maintaining full time staff and resources within its own operations. Likewise, Smart-tek Automated services shares its own resources with these same related parties again to leverage economies of scale.

During the three month period ended March 31, 2012, Smart-tek Automated Services Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary) paid consulting fees of $187,500 to a company controlled by an officer of the Company for Financial, HR and Legal Services. Such costs have been reflected in the accompanying statement of operations.

Smart-tek additionally pays certain fees to another related party for the sharing to office space and utilities. These expenses, which are relatively small, are included in the accompanying statement of operations and were based upon actual usage or allocations agreed to by management personnel.

Following is a summary of the balances both Due To and From these related parties as of March 31, 2012 which in some cases is an accumulation over several years of activity:

		Due From		Due To
Allegiant Professional Business Services Inc.	$	1,732,027	$	423,658
American Marine LLC		474,793		188,397
Dalrada Management Consulting Corp.		354,023		35,381
American Transportation Administrative Services Corp.		11,130		-
Other		-	$	39,783
Total Due from Related Parties	$	2,571,973	$	687,219

Amounts due to officers and directors were $13,461 and $ Nil as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively.

8. Subsequent events

None

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Certain statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that are not historical in fact constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). The PSLRA provides certain “safe harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made in this annual report on Form 10-Q are made pursuant to the PSLRA. Words such as, but not limited to, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors based on the Company’s estimates and expectations concerning future events that may cause the actual results of the Company to be materially different from historical results or from any results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, as well as the Company’s critical accounting policies, are discussed in more detail under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Critical Accounting Policies” and in periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations together with the audited financial statements and the notes to the audited financial statements included in this annual report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Overview

Through our wholly owned subsidiary Smart-tek Automated Services, Inc. (“Smart-tek Automated”), we provide integrated and cost-effective management solutions in the area of human resources services to small and medium-size businesses, relieving our clients from many of the day-to-day tasks that negatively impact their core business operations, such as payroll processing, human resources support, workers' compensation insurance, safety programs, employee benefits, and other administrative and aftermarket services predominantly related to staffing - staff leasing, temporary staffing and co-employment.

Through our Solvis Medical business line we provides medical staffing services to hospitals, medical clinics, surgical centers, skilled nursing facilities, and nursing care to patients in their homes.

Plan of Operation

Short Term

Smart-tek Automated Services Inc.: Continue to concentrate on signing up new brokers who have a large book of business that we can service. Grow the new nurse staffing business line.

Long Term

Smart-tek Automated Services Inc.: Our current strategy is to expand our service business, including staff - and nurse staffing leasing, PEO services, and value added products and services to small and medium-size businesses.

PEO Business Environment

We provide professional employer organization outsourcing (PEO) and human resources services to small and medium-size businesses. These services allow our customers to outsource many human resources tasks, including payroll processing, workers' compensation insurance, employee benefits administration, risk management and human resource administration. These services relieve existing and potential customers of the burdens associated with personnel management and control.

As a human resource department and strategic business partner for our clients, our service offerings allow our clients to:

comply with ever evolving complex employment related regulatory and tax issues;
increase productivity by improving employee satisfaction and retention;
reduce payroll expenses with lower workers' compensation costs; and
focus on core business activities instead of human resource matters.

Our main business, a co-employment or PEO contract arrangement, we become a co-employer of the client's existing workforce and assume some or all of the client's human resource management responsibilities.

Our business continues to experience some liquidity problems. Accordingly, year-to-year comparisons may be of limited usefulness as our business continues to seek growth.

Our current strategy is to expand our service business, including staff leasing, PEO services, and value added products and services to small and medium-size businesses.

PEO Market Overview

The burdens placed on small and medium-sized employers by the complex legal and regulatory issues related to human resources management caused our industry segment to grow beginning in the 1980's. While various service providers have been available to assist these businesses with specific tasks, companies like ours emerged as providers of a more comprehensive range of services relating to the employer/employee relationship. We assume broad aspects of the employer/employee relationship for our clients. Because we provide employee-related services to a large number of employees, we provide economies of scale that provide our clients employment-related functions more efficiently, provide a greater variety of employee benefits, and devote more attention to human resources management.

We believe that the demand for our services is driven by (1) the trend by small and medium-sized businesses toward outsourcing management tasks outside of core competencies; (2) the difficulty of providing competitive health care and related benefits to attract and retain employees; (3) the increasing costs of health and workers' compensation insurance coverage and workplace safety programs; and (4) complex regulation of labor and employment issues and the related costs of compliance.

Medical Staffing

Provides medical staffing services to hospitals, medical clinics, surgical centers, skilled nursing facilities, and nursing care to patients in their homes.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months ending March 31, 2012 and 2011

Revenue

For the three months ending March 31, 2012 and 2011, revenues were $6,480,991 and $4,221,806 respectively, for an increase of $2,259,185 (53.5%) over the same period in 2011. The increase was attributable to a net increase in our payroll and staffing business through Smart-tek Automated Services. The Solvis Medical nurse staffing business line contributed $1,088,518 in 2012.

Gross Profit

Cost of goods sold for the three months ending March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $932,507 and $1,272,515 respectively, for a decrease of $340,008 (26.7%) over the same period in 2011. The decrease in gross profit was directly as result of increased workers compensation expense. Solvis Medical nurse staffing business line contributed $(147,943) to the decrease in 2012

Expenses

Our expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are outlined in the table below:

					Percentage
		Three months ended			Increase/
		March 31,			(Decrease)
		2012		2011
Cost of Revenue	$	5,548,484	$	2,949,291	88.1%
Selling, General and Administrative expenses		2,552,919		898,831	184.0%
Interest Expense and Tax Penalties		64,838		10,330	527.7%
Total Expenses	$	8,166,241	$	3,858,452	111.6%

Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue of $5,548,484 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased by $2,599,193 or 88.1% over the same period prior year amount of $2,949,291. The $2,599,193 increase was attributable to the net increase in the payroll business plus an increase in worker’s compensation claims and premium expense. Solvis Medical contributed 940,575 to the cost of revenue.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses of $2,552,919 for the months ended March 31, 2012 increased by $1,654,088 or 184.0% over the same period prior year amount of $898,831. The increase was mainly attributable to the following: 1) increase professional fees of $1,253,231 (3,888.5%), 2) increase in wages of $332,846 (106.8%) and miscellaneous expense items amounting to $68,011 (10.4%) .

Interest and tax penalties

Interest expense and tax penalties for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $64,838, an increase of $54,508 or 527.7% over the same period prior year amount of $10,330.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

		The Months			Year		Percentage
		Ended			Ended		Increase/
		March 31,			December 31,		(Decrease)
		2012			2011
Current Assets	$	4,326,699		$	4,550,447		(4.9%	)
Current Liabilities		17,022,317			15,391,392		10.6%
Working Capital (Deficiency)	$	(12,695,618	)	$	(10,840,945	)	(17.1%	)

Cash Flows
	Three Months		Three Months		Percentage
	Ended		Ended		Increase/
	March 31,		March 31,		(Decrease)
	2012		2011
Cash from (used in) Operating Activities	(97,492	)	(14,262	)	(583.6%	)
Cash (used in) Investing Activities	(35,000	)	(38,882	)	(10.0%	)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash	(132,492	)	(53,144	)	(149.3%	)

We had cash on hand of $0 and working capital deficit of $12,695,618 as of March 31, 2012 compared to cash on hand of $132,492 and working capital deficit of $10,840,945 for the year ended December 31, 2011. We anticipate that we will incur approximately $650,000 a month for operating expenses, including professional, legal and accounting expenses associated with our reporting requirements under the Exchange Act during the next twelve months.

Cash Provided In Operating Activities

Cash flow used in operations for the three months ending March 31, 2012 amounted to $97,492 which mainly consisted the following: 1) the net loss for the period of $1,685,250; 2) increase in accounts receivable of $119,551; 3) increase in prepaid workers compensation of $140,000; and 4) increase in workers compensation expense of $220,386, offset by 1) depreciation expense of $5,578, 2) due form related party of $167,247; 3) proceeds from related party of $78,197; 4) prepaid workers compensation of $43,560; 5) bank overdraft of $93,829; 6) increase in accounts payable of $1,398,544; and 7) accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $280,740.

Cash Used In Investing Activities

We used cash in investing activities in the amount of $35,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Future Cash Nets

STTNS future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the control of workers compensation claims, the establishment of reasonable workers compensation premiums, and growing the business with business that employee more favorable worker compensation class types. We cannot for certain claim that our current operations along with financing from outside will be sufficient to meet our ongoing operating needs. We will need to seek outside capital in order to continue as a going concern. In addition, we cannot predict when and if any additional capital contributions may be needed and we may need to seek one or more substantial new investors. New investors could cause substantial dilution to existing stockholders

Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a large loss from operations, and as of March 31, 2012, its total liabilities exceeded its total assets by $8,589,832. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management has hired a consultant to put controls in the cash management area and will institute more efficient management techniques in the finance department. All areas of operations will be reviewed to look for savings. However, the Company has a need for additional capital investment. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not Applicable.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures at March 31, 2012, which is the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was carried out by our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as at the end of the period covered by this report.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity's disclosure objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objectives is affected by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established process.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of March 31, 2012, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f). Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO Framework").

Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not as effective as of September 30, 2011 due to the relatively small staff size of its financial group. As such, our principal Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that we could have a material weakness due to lack of segregation of duties. The volume of administrative work peaks at the end of each quarter requiring additional resources to process the workload. We have hired an additional administrative person to assist in that additional workload

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the company to provide only management's report on internal control in this annual report.

IDENTIFIED MATERIAL WEAKNESS

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management identified the following material weakness in internal control during its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011:

Our organization structure is not properly set up to manage the flow of cash and the efficient payment of taxes.
We lack the expertise to properly manage the finance and treasury function.

MANAGEMENT'S REMEDIATION INITIATIVES

We are undertaking the remedial measures to establish an effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over the cash management / treasury functions, including consolidating finance and treasury into one department reporting to one manager and improving the supervision and training of our accounting staff to understand and implement accounting requirements, policies and procedures for the Treasury department. We have hired a qualified consultant who can work with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer to indentify cash issues and help evaluate and address such issues to prevent and fix any present problems in managing cash as well as establishing a procedure to prevent future failures to manage cash properly.

In light of the identified material weaknesses, management, performed (1) significant additional substantive review of those areas described above, and (2) performed additional analyses, including but not limited to a detailed balance sheet and statement of operations analytical review that compared changes from the prior period's financial statements and analyzed all significant differences. These procedures were completed so management could gain assurance that the financial statements and schedules included in this Form 10-Q fairly present in all material respects the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Changes in Internal Controls

There has been no additional change except for what is discussed above in our internal control over financial reporting during this fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation as amended⁽¹⁾
3.2	Bylaws⁽¹⁾
3.3	Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation ⁽²⁾
4.1	Incentive Stock Option Plan ⁽¹⁾
4.2	Non-Qualified Incentive Stock Option Plan ⁽¹⁾
4.3	Stock Bonus Plan ⁽¹⁾
4.4	2005 Incentive Stock Plan ⁽²⁾
10.1	Letter of Intent between Smart-Tek Communications and Smart-Tek ⁽³⁾
10.2	Share Exchange Agreement between Registrant and Smart-Tek Communication, Inc dated April 15, 2005 ⁽⁴⁾
10.3	Employment Agreement with Perry Law dated April 23, 2005 ⁽⁵⁾
10.4	Employment Agreement with Stephen Platt dated April 23, 2005 ⁽⁵⁾
10.5	Stock Option Grant to Perry Law dated April 23, 2005 ⁽⁶⁾
10.6	Stock Option Grant to Stephen Platt dated April 23, 2005 ⁽⁶⁾
10.7	Amendment to Employment Agreement between Smart-Tek Communications Inc. and Perry Law dated July 31, 2009
10.8	Form of Debt Settlement and Subscription Agreement dated September 30, 2009
10.9	Strategic Marketing Partner Agreement between Smart-Tek Automated Services Inc. and ACEO Inc. dated August 1, 2009
10.10	Marketing Partner Agreement dated June 17, 2009
10.11	Amended Marketing Partner Agreement dated December 9, 2010 with Smart-Tek Automated Services, Inc. and Brian Bonar
10.12	General Release of Claims Agreement Entered into between Richardson Patel LLC and Smart-Tek Solutions, Inc.
14.1	Amended and Restated Code of Ethics
21.1	Subsidiaries
31.1*	CEO and CFO Section 302 Certification under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*	CEO and CFO Section 906 Certifications under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*Filed herewith

(1)	Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, filed September 28, 1995.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, filed October 26, 1995.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 8, 2005.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 19, 2005.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form8-K, filed April 27, 2005.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 22, 2005.
(7)	Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 27, 2008.
(8)	Incorporated by reference to our Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, filed on February 23, 2009.
(9)	Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 24, 2009.

(10)	Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed October 15, 2008.
(11)	Incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed October 13, 2009.
(12)	Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 17, 2010.
(13)	Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 10, 2010

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

By	/s/ Brian Bonar

	Brian Bonar
	President

	/s/ Brian Bonar
Date:	May 21, 2012

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

	/s/ Brian Bonar
	Brian Bonar
	Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
	and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
	and Principal Financial Officer)

Date:	May 21, 2012

	/s/ Owen Naccarato
	Owen Naccarato
	Director

Date:	May 21, 2012

Smart-tek Solutions Inc 10-Q