~~UNITED~~U.S. ~~STATES~~SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

~~SECURITIES~~WASHINGTON, ~~AND~~D.C. ~~EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~20549

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

~~(Mark~~ X ~~One~~. Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

XFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

~~ANNUAL~~ n Transition ~~REPORT~~Report ~~PURSUANT~~Pursuant TOto ~~SECTION~~Section 13 ORor 15(d) OFof ~~THE~~the ~~SECURITIES~~Securities ~~EXCHANGE~~Exchange ~~ACT~~Act OFof 1934

For the ~~fiscal~~transition ~~year~~period ~~ended~~from ~~December~~______ ~~31,~~to ~~2008~~________

~~TRANSITION~~Commission ~~REPORT~~File ~~PURSUANT~~Number ~~TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~000-53405

~~For~~OPTIMIZED ~~the~~TRANSPORTATION ~~transition~~MANAGEMENT, ~~period from ________ to __________~~INC.

~~Commission~~(Name ~~File~~of ~~Number:~~Registrant ~~333-88179~~as Specified in Its Charter)

UNITED RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT, INC.

Delaware

74-2958195

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

~~(Exact~~707 ~~name~~Grant ofStreet, ~~Registrant~~Suite as#2307, ~~specified~~Pittsburgh, inPA, ~~its charter)~~15219

Delaware	74-29581956
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

374 East 400 South, Suite #3, Springville, UT	84663
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(412) 258-2260 [optimized10k123109004.gif]

~~Issuer~~Registrant’s ~~telephone~~Telephone ~~number~~Number, ~~including~~Including ~~area~~Area ~~code: (801~~Code) ~~489-4802~~

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: ~~None~~

~~Securities~~Title ~~registered~~of ~~pursuant~~Each toClass ~~Section~~Name ~~12(g)~~ of ~~the~~Exchange ~~Act:~~ on which Registered Common Stock , ~~Par Value~~ $0.001 Par Value

~~Indicate~~Securities byregistered ~~check~~under ~~mark~~Section if12(g) ~~the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405~~ of the ~~Securities~~Exchange Act~~. Yes No X~~ .:

~~Indicate~~Common byStock, ~~check~~$.001 ~~mark~~Par ifValue ~~the~~per ~~registrant~~Share ~~is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. .~~

Indicate by check mark ~~whether~~if the registrant ~~(1)~~is ~~has~~a ~~filed~~well-known ~~all~~seasoned ~~reports~~issuer, ~~required~~as todefined bein ~~filed~~rule by405 ~~section 13 or 15(d)~~ of the Securities ~~Exchange~~ Act. ofYes . ~~1934~~nNo X ~~during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days~~.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(1d) ~~Yes X No (2) Yes X No~~ of the Exchange Act. .

Indicate by check mark ifwhether ~~disclosure~~the ofregistrant ~~delinquent~~(1) ~~filers~~filed ~~pursuant~~all reports required to ~~Item~~be ~~405~~filed ofby ~~Regulation~~Section ~~S-K~~13 or 15(~~§229.405~~d) of ~~this~~the ~~chapter)~~Exchange isAct ~~not~~during ~~contained~~the ~~herein,~~past ~~and~~12 ~~will~~months ~~not~~(or befor ~~contained,~~such toshorter ~~the~~period ~~best~~that ofthe registrant’s ~~knowledge,~~was inrequired ~~definitive~~to ~~proxy~~file orsuch ~~information~~reports), ~~statements~~and ~~incorporated~~(2) byhas ~~reference~~been insubject ~~Part~~to ~~III~~such offiling ~~this~~requirements ~~Form~~for ~~10-K~~the orpast ~~any~~90 ~~amendment to this Form 10-K~~days. Yes X . No .

Indicate by check mark ~~whether~~if the ~~registrant~~disclosure isof adelinquent ~~large~~filers ~~accelerated~~pursuant ~~filer,~~to anItem ~~accelerated~~405 ~~filer,~~of aRegulation ~~non~~S-~~accelerated~~K ~~filer~~is not contained herein, orand awill ~~smaller~~not ~~reporting~~be ~~company. See~~contained, ~~definitions~~to ofthe ~~“large~~best ~~accelerated~~of ~~filer~~registrant's knowledge,” ~~“accelerated~~in ~~filer,”~~definitive ~~and~~proxy ~~“smaller~~or ~~reporting~~information ~~company”~~statements incorporated by reference in ~~Rule~~Part ~~12b-2~~III of ~~the~~this ~~Exchange~~Form ~~Act~~10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K. .

~~Large~~Indicate ~~Accelerated~~by ~~Filer~~ check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes . No X .

~~Accelerated~~Indicate ~~Filer~~ by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer" and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer . Accelerated filer . Non-accelerated ~~Filer~~ filer . Smaller Reporting Company X .

~~Smaller~~Indicate ~~reporting~~by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes . No X .

~~Indicate~~The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by ~~check~~non-affiliates ~~mark~~of ~~whether~~the registrant based on the closing share price of the registrant's iscommon astock ~~shell~~on ~~company~~December (31, 2009 as ~~defined~~reported on the OTC Bulletin Board was $4,611,200. Shares of common stock held by each current executive officer and director and by each person who is known by the registrant to own 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this computation in ~~Rule~~that ~~12b-2~~such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the ~~Act)~~registrant. ~~Yes X No~~ This determination of affiliate status is not a conclusive determination for other purposes.

~~Because~~As ~~the stock~~ of ~~the~~March ~~registrant~~30, ~~was~~2010, ~~not quoted for trading until September 2008~~13,293,000 itcommon isshares ~~unable to provide the average bid and asked price~~ of the ~~Common Stock as of the last business day of the~~ registrant’'s ~~most recently completed second fiscal quarter and thus cannot provide the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting~~ common ~~equity~~stock ~~held~~were ~~by non-affiliates of the registrant~~outstanding.

AtDocuments ~~March~~Incorporated ~~15,~~by ~~2009,~~Reference: ~~there~~None ~~were 55,485,660 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.~~

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

~~Table~~TABLE ofOF ~~Contents~~CONTENTS

PART I


ITEM 1	BUSINESS	5
ITEM 1A	RISK FACTORS	8
ITEM 1B	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	11
ITEM 2	PROPERTIES	11
ITEM 3	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	11
ITEM 4	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	11

PART II

ITEM 5	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	11
ITEM 6	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	12
ITEM 7	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	12
ITEM 8	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	16
ITEM 9	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES	16
ITEM 9A(T)	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	16
ITEM 9B	OTHER INFORMATION	16

PART III

ITEM 10	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	16
ITEM 11	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	18
ITEM 12	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	19
ITEM 13	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	20
ITEM 14	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	20

PART IV

ITEM 15	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	21

SIGNATURES		22

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		F-1

Item 1. Business

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

ITEM 2. Properties

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

ITEM 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders

PART II

ITEM 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer Purchases Of Equity Securities

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS And Supplementary Data

ITEM 9. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And Financial Disclosure

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

ITEM 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management And Related Stockholder Matters

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, And Director Independence

ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees And Services

PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

~~Forward~~CAUTIONARY ~~Looking~~STATEMENT ~~Statements~~ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

~~The~~Cautionary ~~statements~~Statement contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that represent management’s beliefs and assumptions based on currently available information. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our search for an operating company, possible or assumed future operations, business strategies, need for financing, competitive position, potential growth opportunities, ability to retain and recruit personnel, the effects of competition and the effects of future legislation or regulations. Forward-~~looking~~Looking ~~statements~~Statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the words “believes,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “could,” “plans,” or comparable terminology or by discussions of strategy or trends. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot give any assurances that these expectations will prove to be correct. Such statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected results, and actual future results could differ materially from those described in such forward-looking statements.

~~Among~~This report includes forward-looking statements within the ~~factors~~meaning ~~that~~of ~~could~~Section ~~cause~~27A ~~actual~~of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, regarding future ~~results~~operating toperformance, ~~differ~~events, ~~materially~~trends and plans. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained herein, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues and costs, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the ~~risks~~use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or “believes” or the negative thereof or any variation thereon or similar terminology or expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties ~~discussed~~and inassumptions ~~this~~about ~~report~~us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. While it is ~~not~~impossible ~~possible~~ to identify all of the factors that may cause our actual operating performance, weevents, ~~continue~~trends or plans to ~~face~~differ ~~many~~materially ~~risks~~from ~~and~~those ~~uncertainties~~set ~~including,~~forth ~~but~~in ~~not~~such ~~limited~~forward-looking tostatements, ~~changes~~such infactors ~~regulation~~include ofour ~~shell~~ability orto: ~~blank~~(i) ~~check~~retain ~~companies;~~and build upon the ~~general~~relationships ~~economic~~we ~~downturn;~~have awith ~~further~~our ~~downturn~~exclusive inagency offices; (ii) continue the ~~securities~~development ~~markets;~~of our ~~ability~~back office infrastructure and transportation and accounting systems in a manner sufficient to ~~raised~~service ~~needed~~our ~~operating~~expanding ~~funds~~revenues and ~~continue~~base asof aexclusive ~~going~~agency ~~concern~~locations; ~~and~~(iii) ~~other~~continue ~~risks~~growing our business and ~~uncertainties. Should~~maintain ~~one~~historical or ~~more~~increased ofgross ~~these~~profit ~~risks~~margins; ~~materialize~~(iv) locate suitable acquisition opportunities; (orv) secure the ~~consequences~~financing ofnecessary ~~such~~to acomplete ~~development~~any ~~worsen~~acquisition opportunities we locate; (vi), orassess ~~should~~and respond to competitive practices in the ~~underlying~~industries ~~assumptions~~in ~~prove~~which ~~incorrect~~we compete, ~~actual~~(vii) ~~results~~mitigate, ~~could~~to ~~differ~~the ~~materially~~best extent possible, our dependence on current management; (viii) assess and respond to such other factors which may be identified from time to time in our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and other public announcements including those ~~expected~~set forth below in Part 1 Item 1A. We ~~disclaim~~All ~~any~~subsequent ~~intention~~written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or ~~obligation~~persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. Readers are cautioned not to ~~update~~place ~~publicly~~undue orreliance ~~revise~~on ~~such~~our forward-looking statements, ~~whether~~ as athey ~~result~~speak only as of ~~new~~the ~~information~~date made. Except as required by law, ~~future~~we ~~events~~assume no duty to update or ~~otherwise~~revise our forward-looking statements.

~~There may also be other risks and uncertainties that we are unable to identify and/or predict at this time or that we do not now expect to have a material adverse impact on our business.~~4

Introductory Comment

Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise designated, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” and “our Company” refer to United Restaurant Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

~~Overview~~The ~~and Development of the~~ Company

~~The~~Optimized ~~original~~Transportation ~~business~~Management, ofInc. (the “Company”) ~~was~~is ~~commenced~~a inPittsburgh, ~~1996~~Pennsylvania ~~through~~based asupply ~~Texas~~chain ~~Corporation. Our~~Logistics Company ~~was~~formed ~~thereafter~~subsequent ~~incorporated~~to in the ~~State~~acquisition of ~~Delaware~~its ontwo ~~September~~operating 20subsidiaries, ~~1999,~~Federal ~~as International Test Systems~~Logistics, Inc. ~~With~~ ~~the organization of the Delaware corporation~~(FL), ~~we acquired all of the assets~~ and ~~certain~~Optimized ~~liabilities~~Transportation ofSoftware, ~~the~~Inc. ~~Texas~~(OTSI). ~~corporation~~FL, ~~and~~a ~~exchanged~~non ~~shares~~asset ofbased ~~our~~transportation ~~Company~~company, ~~for~~was ~~all~~incorporated ofin the ~~outstanding~~state ~~shares~~ of ~~the~~Florida ~~Texas~~on ~~corporation~~February ~~which~~29, ~~was thereafter dissolved~~2008. We ~~ceased principal operations by December 31~~OTSI, ~~2003. In~~engaged ~~September~~in ~~2007,~~ the ~~Company~~implementation ~~filed a Certificate~~ of ~~Amendment~~supply tochain ~~its~~software, ~~Certificate~~was ofincorporated ~~Incorporation~~in tothe ~~affect~~state aof ~~name~~Florida ~~change~~on toSeptember ~~United Restaurant Management~~25, ~~Inc~~2007. ~~in connection with a proposed transaction which was abandoned. The Company has no subsidiaries.~~

~~Effective~~As ~~September~~reported 18on a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 19, ~~2007~~2009, weon ~~reverse~~June ~~split~~19, 2009 UNITED RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT, Inc. (the ~~outstanding~~“Registrant”), ~~shares~~a ofDelaware ~~common~~corporation, ~~stock~~entered atinto an Agreement (the ~~rate~~“Agreement”) ofwith ~~1-for-25~~World Logistics Services. On ~~July~~Inc. ~~15,~~(“World ~~2008~~Logistics”), wea ~~authorized~~corporation aincorporated ~~forward~~under ~~split~~the atlaws of the ~~rate~~state of ~~20-for-1~~Delaware. ~~for~~Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, World Logistics agreed to transfer all ~~common~~of ~~shares~~the ~~which~~issued ~~were~~and outstanding onshares ~~April~~of 21common stock in Federal Logistics, ~~2008~~Inc. and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. to the ~~effective~~Registrant ~~date~~in ofexchange for the ~~forward~~issuance ~~split~~of ~~(collectively~~an aggregate of 5,500,000 shares of the “Registrant’s common stock and 700,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock ~~Splits~~(“Series A Preferred Stock”)~~. The~~ ~~effects~~and 500,000 shares of ~~the~~Series B Preferred Stock ~~Splits~~(“Series ~~are~~B ~~retroactively~~Preferred ~~stated~~Stock”) ~~throughout~~to ~~this~~Kevin ~~report~~P. Brennan, ~~unless~~thereby ~~otherwise~~causing ~~noted~~Federal Logistics, Inc. (FL) and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. (OTSI) to become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant (the “Share Exchange”).

4Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. (the “Company,” “we” or “us”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 15, 2001. We are executing a strategy to build a global transportation and supply chain management company through organic growth and the strategic acquisition of best-of-breed non-asset based transportation and logistics providers to offer its customers domestic and international freight transportation and an expanding array of value added supply chain management services, including order fulfillment, inventory management and warehousing.

On April 4, 2008, Steven L. White entered into an agreement with Carey G. Birmingham, the sole officer, director and principal shareholder of the Company at the time, to acquire 20,000,000 shares of common stock from the Company for $20,000 and to accept appointment as the sole director of the Company. The ~~closing~~growth ofstrategy ~~the~~we ~~agreement~~intend ~~was held~~ on ~~April~~implementing ~~22,~~is ~~2008. At~~dependent ~~closing~~on ~~the~~our ~~Company~~ability ~~sold 20,000,000 shares of common stock~~ to ~~Steven~~source ~~L. White for $20,000. As a result of the closing, control of the Company changed from Mr. Birmingham to Mr. White, who became the sole executive officer~~ and ~~director,~~contract ~~and~~with ~~principal~~new ~~shareholder~~agency ~~of the Company. The 20~~locations,~~000,000~~ ~~shares issued~~ to ~~Mr.~~continue ~~White were not subject~~ to ~~the~~complete ~~20-for-1 forward stock split which was effective for all shares immediately prior to~~ the ~~issuance~~strategic acquisition of ~~these~~supply ~~shares~~chain tooperations ~~Mr.~~that ~~White. Also~~either inprovide ~~connection~~niche ~~with~~services ~~the~~we ~~change~~are ofnot ~~control~~currently ~~transaction,~~providing ~~Mr.~~our ~~Birmingham agreed to sell 32~~customers,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~or ofwhose ~~common~~earnings ~~stock~~are ~~owned by him to persons referred by Mr. White. Thereafter~~accretive, ~~Mr.~~and ~~Birmingham~~finally ~~sold~~we ~~24,000,000~~are ofable ~~these shares~~ to ~~1st~~continue ~~Orion Corp. As part of this transaction, Mr. Birmingham also forgave all obligations owed by the Company~~ to ~~him,~~source ~~including~~and ~~amounts~~complete ~~owed under~~ the ~~Company’s~~proper ~~line~~financing ~~of credit with him. Mr. Birmingham also cancelled warrants~~ to ~~purchase~~implement upour togrowth ~~600,000~~opportunities ~~shares~~timely.

~~The~~Industry ~~Company~~Overview is a shell company and is seeking potential business acquisitions or opportunities to enter into in an effort to again initiate business operations. The Company has been engaged in preliminary discussions with, and has commenced preliminary due diligence on, a potential target company. The Company has retained counsel to assist management in the acquisition process and has prepared a draft letter of intent in connection with these preliminary discussions. However, no letter of intent has been executed by either party and there are currently no agreements with respect to any acquisition.

~~Business~~As the cost of logistics services has become an ever increasing percentage of the ~~Company~~cost of goods, the importance to manufacturers and distributors to efficiently manage the supply chain has increased. It is ever more important for manufacturers and distributors to manage inventory levels, and manufacture and assembly processes, as efficiently as possible, and to transport, warehouse, and distribute with the least costs incurred. This has become especially important to smaller manufacturers and distributors who must compete globally, our target market. These sub Fortune 1000 companies are most dependent on a third party provider with the expertise to supply the complete array of services necessary to fully manage the entire supply chain.

~~Selection~~Our clientele has typically two principal third-party alternatives: a non-asset based operation which sub-contracts the equipment to either an asst based carrier or owner operators, or an asset based carrier. We are a non-asset based carrier primarily that has a small fleet it owns and operates. We procure shipments from customers and arrange the transportation of cargo on either a ~~Business~~carrier, an owner operator leased to our subsidiary or our own fleet.

~~The~~Most ~~Company~~non-asset ~~anticipates~~based ~~that~~carriers ~~businesses~~focus ~~for~~on ~~possible~~full ~~acquisition~~truck ~~will~~load beoperations ~~referred by various sources, including its sole officer~~ and ~~director,~~do ~~shareholders,~~not ~~professional~~compete ~~advisors,~~with ~~securities~~shippers ~~broker-dealers,~~of ~~venture~~small ~~capitalists~~packages, ~~members~~such ofas ~~the~~UPS ~~financial community,~~ and ~~others who may present unsolicited proposals~~FedEx. ~~The~~ Small ~~Company~~package ~~will~~deliverers ~~not~~tend ~~engage~~to inhave ~~any~~high ~~general~~fixed ~~solicitation~~expenses orassociated ~~advertising~~with ~~for a business opportunity~~owning, operating and ~~will~~maintaining ~~rely~~fleets ~~on personal contacts~~ of ~~its~~aircraft, ~~sole~~trucks ~~officer~~ and ~~director~~related ~~and~~equipment. ~~his~~They ~~affiliates,~~often asimpose ~~well~~significant asrestrictions ~~indirect~~on ~~associations~~delivery ~~between~~schedules ~~him~~ and ~~other~~shipment ~~business~~weight, size and ~~professional people~~type. By ~~relying~~On ~~on “word of mouth~~occasion,” ~~the~~these ~~Company~~shippers ~~may~~serve beas ~~limited~~our incustomers, ~~the number of potential acquisitions it can identify. While it is not presently anticipated that the Company will engage unaffiliated professional firms specializing in business acquisitions~~ or ~~reorganizations,~~we ~~such firms~~ may becontract ~~retained~~with ifthem ~~management~~to ~~deems~~use ittheir inequipment ~~the~~to ~~best~~move ~~interest~~a ~~of the Company~~shipment.

~~Compensation~~Our toGrowth aStrategy finder or business acquisition firm may take various forms, including a one-time cash payment, payments based on a percentage of revenues or product sales volume, payments involving issuance of securities (including those of the Company), or any combination of these or other compensation arrangements. Consequently, the Company is currently unable to predict the cost of utilizing such services.

~~The~~Our ~~Company~~business ~~will~~plan ~~not~~is ~~restrict its search~~ to ~~any~~provide ~~particular~~our ~~business,~~customers ~~industry,~~with ora ~~geographical~~full ~~location,~~service ~~and~~supply ~~management~~chain ~~may~~logistics ~~evaluate and enter into any type of business in any location~~operation. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Our ~~may~~plan ~~participate~~is ~~in a newly organized business venture or a more established company entering a new phase of growth or in need of additional capital~~ to ~~overcome~~achieve ~~existing~~this ~~financial~~by ~~problems. Participation~~implementing inboth adomestic ~~new~~and ~~business~~global ~~venture~~operations ~~entails~~and ~~greater risks since in many instances management of such a venture will not have proved its ability,~~ the ~~eventual~~ancillary ~~market of such venture’s product or~~ services ~~will likely not be established~~, ~~and~~including the ~~profitability~~software, ofnecessary ~~the~~to ~~venture~~fully ~~will~~manage beour ~~unproved~~customers ~~and~~supply ~~cannot~~chain ~~be predicted accurately~~requirements. If ~~the~~We ~~Company~~will ~~participates~~grow inour abusiness ~~more~~organically ~~established~~and ~~firm~~acquire companies with ~~existing financial problems, it may be subjected to risk because~~ the ~~financial~~operations ~~resources~~that ofboth ~~the~~complement ~~Company~~and ~~may~~diversify ~~not~~our beservices ~~adequate~~ to ~~eliminate~~our ~~or reverse the circumstances leading to such financial problems~~customers.

In seeking a business venture, the decision of management will not be controlled by an attempt to take advantage of any anticipated or perceived appeal of a specific industry, management group, product, or industry, but will be based on the business objective of seeking long-term capital appreciation in the real value of the Company.

The analysis of new businesses will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the sole officer and director. In analyzing prospective businesses, management will consider, to the extent applicable, the following: the available technical, financial, and managerial resources, working capital and other prospects for the future, the nature of present and expected competition, the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that management, the potential for further research, development, or exploration, the potential for growth and expansion, the potential for profit, the perceived public recognition or acceptance of products, services, or trade or service marks, name identification and other relevant factors.

~~The~~Organically, ~~decision~~we towill ~~participate~~continue into agrow ~~specific~~our business ~~may~~by beadding ~~based~~new onagents ~~management’s~~and ~~analysis~~cross ofmarketing ~~the~~to ~~quality~~our ofexisting ~~the~~customers. ~~other~~As ~~firm’s~~we ~~management~~add ~~and~~new ~~personnel,~~services ~~the~~and ~~anticipated acceptability of~~ new ~~products~~customers orwe ~~marketing~~will ~~concepts,~~continually revisit the ~~merit~~needs of ~~technological~~our ~~changes~~current customers, ~~and~~until ~~other~~we ~~factors which~~ are ~~difficult,~~able ~~if not impossible,~~ to ~~analyze~~provide ~~through~~them ~~any~~the ~~objective~~full ~~criteria. It~~scope isof ~~anticipated~~their ~~that~~supply ~~the~~chain ~~results~~needs. ofWe ~~operations~~will ofenhance aour ~~specific~~customer ~~firm~~base ~~may~~both ~~not~~in ~~necessarily~~types beof ~~indicative~~markets ofserved, ~~the~~and ~~potential~~geographically ~~for~~by ~~the~~expanding ~~future~~our ~~because~~contacts ofin the ~~requirement~~agency tobusiness ~~substantially~~and ~~shift~~exploiting ~~marketing~~existing ~~approaches,~~relationships ~~expand~~our ~~significantly,~~management ~~change~~has ~~product~~built ~~emphasis,~~up ~~change~~with orover ~~substantially~~30 ~~augment~~years ~~management,~~in ~~and~~the ~~other factors~~business.

~~The~~We ~~Company~~ will ~~analyze~~focus ~~all~~our ~~available~~acquisition ~~factors~~strategy, ~~and~~targeting ~~make~~those acompanies ~~determination~~that ~~based~~provide onparts ~~a composite~~ of ~~available~~the ~~facts,~~supply ~~without~~chain ~~reliance~~that onwe ~~any~~currently ~~single~~lack ~~factor. The~~or ~~period~~are ~~within~~deficient ~~which the Company may participate~~ in, ~~a business cannot be predicted~~ and ~~will~~limiting ~~depend~~our onsearch ~~circumstances beyond the Company’s control, including the availability of businesses, the time required for the Company~~ to ~~complete~~well ~~its~~run ~~investigation~~organizations ~~and~~that ~~analysis~~will ofbe ~~prospective~~both ~~businesses,~~accretive ~~the time required to prepare appropriate documents~~ and ~~agreements~~enhance ~~providing~~our ~~for~~management ~~the Company’s participation, and other circumstances~~team.

~~Acquisition~~Our ofOperating aStrategy ~~Business~~

InOur ~~implementing~~operating aobjective ~~structure~~is ~~for~~to ahelp ~~particular~~great ~~business~~companies ~~acquisition~~discover, ~~the~~manage ~~Company may become a party to a merger, consolidation, or other reorganization with another corporation or entity; joint venture; license; purchase~~ and ~~sale~~execute oftheir ~~assets;~~most oreffective ~~purchase~~global ~~and~~supply ~~sale~~chain ~~of stock, the exact nature of which cannot now be predicted~~strategies. ~~The~~ ~~structure~~We ofexist ~~the~~to ~~particular~~add ~~business~~real, ~~acquisition~~measurable ~~will~~value bethroughout ~~approved~~our bycustomers' ~~the~~fulfillment ~~Board~~process of- ~~Directors and may not require~~ the ~~approval~~accent ofis ~~the~~on ~~Company’s shareholders~~customers. ~~Notwithstanding~~ ~~the~~Our ~~above~~team, ~~the~~technology ~~Company~~and ~~does~~value-added ~~not~~solutions ~~intend~~allow organizations to ~~participate~~have inworld-class ~~a business through the purchase of minority stock positions. Upon the consummation of a transaction~~visibility, itinformation ~~is likely that the present management~~ and ~~shareholders~~controls ofwithout ~~the~~disrupting ~~Company~~existing ~~will~~plans, ~~not be in control of the Company. In addition~~processes, itpartnerships ~~is anticipated that the current sole officer~~ and ~~director~~information ~~would resign in favor of new management designated by the target company without a vote of the Company’s stockholders~~systems.

InOur ~~the event the Company enters into an~~ acquisition ~~transaction~~strategies ~~with~~focus ~~another~~clearly ~~entity,~~on ~~the~~our ~~Company~~ability ~~will~~to beprovide ~~required~~end to ~~report~~end ~~the~~services ~~transaction~~for ingrowing aglobal ~~Current~~opportunities. ~~Report~~We onwill ~~Form~~provide ~~8-K~~clients ~~within~~with ~~four~~global ~~business~~freight ~~days~~forwarding ~~following the execution of the agreement~~services, ~~and~~global ~~any~~document ~~amendment thereto~~management, ~~and~~product ~~within four business days following the closing of the transaction. In addition~~staging, ~~because the Company is~~ a ~~shell~~powerful ~~company, if the transaction results in the Company no longer being a shell company, it will be required to file within four business days a Current Report on Form 8-K which includes the~~ information technology that ~~would~~supports betight ~~required~~integration ~~if the Company were filing a general form for registration of securities on Form 10 reflecting the Company~~ and ~~its~~total ~~securities~~visibility ~~upon~~among ~~consummation~~global offactories, ~~the transaction~~suppliers, ~~including information on the new business~~ and ~~management~~end-user ofcustomers ~~the~~sourcing ~~Company~~product ~~after closing~~globally.

~~In connection with the Company’s acquisition of a business~~Additionally, ~~the~~we ~~present~~will ~~shareholders~~be ~~of the Company, including current management, may, as~~ a ~~negotiated~~focus ~~element~~on ofmanaging ~~the~~warehouse ~~acquisition,~~operations ~~sell~~in asupport ~~portion or all~~ of ~~the~~existing ~~Company’s~~clients ~~Common~~and ~~Stock~~potential ~~held~~new byclients, ~~them~~supporting atboth adomestic ~~significant~~and ~~premium~~global ~~over~~supply ~~their~~chain ~~original investment in the Company~~strategies. It isWe ~~not~~will ~~unusual~~operate ~~for~~each ~~affiliates~~ of ~~the~~our ~~entity~~divisions ~~participating~~independently, inbut ~~the~~sell ~~reorganization to negotiate to purchase shares held by the present shareholders in order to reduce the number of “restricted securities” held by persons no longer affiliated with the Company~~ and ~~thereby~~add ~~reduce~~real ~~the~~measurable ~~potential~~value ~~adverse impact on the public market in the Company’s Common Stock that could result from substantial sales of such shares after the restrictions no longer apply~~collectively. As aIn ~~result of such sales~~addition, ~~affiliates~~to of the ~~entity~~synergies, ~~participating~~this inapproach ~~the~~ensures ~~business reorganization with~~ the ~~Company~~quality ~~would acquire a higher percentage~~ of ~~equity~~our ~~ownership~~internal inoperations ~~the~~but ~~Company. Public~~our ~~investors~~joint ~~will~~capabilities ~~not~~provides ~~receive~~significant ~~any~~value ~~portion of the premium that may be paid in the foregoing circumstances. Furthermore, the Company’s shareholders may not be afforded an opportunity~~ to ~~approve~~our ~~or consent to any particular stock buy-out transaction~~clients.

InOperations the event sales of shares by present stockholders of the Company, including current management, is a negotiated element of a future acquisition, a conflict of interest may arise because our sole director will be negotiating for the acquisition on behalf of the Company and for sale of his or shareholders’ shares for his own or the shareholders’ respective accounts. Where a business opportunity is well suited for acquisition by the Company, but affiliates of the business opportunity impose a condition that management sell shares at a price which is unacceptable to our sole director, management may not sacrifice his or the shareholders’ financial interest for the Company to complete the transaction. Where the business opportunity is not well suited, but the price offered management for the shares is high, management will be tempted to effect the acquisition to realize a substantial gain on the shares in the Company. Management has not adopted any policy for resolving the foregoing potential conflicts, should they arise, and does not intend to obtain an independent appraisal to determine whether any price that may be offered for their shares is fair. Stockholders must rely, instead, on the obligation of management to fulfill its fiduciary duty under state law to act in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Through our stations, we offer domestic and international air, ocean and ground freight forwarding for shipments that are generally larger than shipments handled by integrated carriers of primarily small parcels such as Federal Express Corporation and United Parcel Service. Our revenues are generated from a number of diverse services, including air freight forwarding, ocean freight forwarding, customs brokerage, logistics and other value-added services.

Our primary business operations involve obtaining shipment or material orders from customers, creating and delivering a wide range of logistics solutions to meet customers' specific requirements for transportation and related services, and arranging and monitoring all aspects of material flow activity utilizing advanced information technology systems. These logistics solutions include domestic and international freight forwarding and door-to-door delivery services using a wide range of transportation modes, including air, ocean and truck. As a non-asset based provider we do not own the transportation equipment used to transport the freight. We expect to neither own nor operate any aircraft and, consequently, place no restrictions on delivery schedules or shipment size. We arrange for transportation of our customers’ shipments via commercial airlines, air cargo carriers, and other assets and non-asset based third-party providers. We select the carrier for a shipment based on route, departure time, available cargo capacity and cost. We charter cargo aircraft from time to time depending upon seasonality, freight volumes and other factors. We make a profit or margin on the difference between what we charge to our customers for the totality of services provided to them, and what we pay to the transportation provider to transport the freight.

Information Services

We utilize a proprietary freight forwarding software, “Optivity Suite” that combine to form the foundation of our supply-chain technologies. Our software is marketed separately through our consolidated subsidiary.

About our software – Optivity Suite

Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. (OTSI) is a total solution provider of supply chain execution software and services to the freight transportation, distribution, and logistics industries.

Our mission is to provide the most efficient, reliable, easy-to-use Transportation Management Services in the market, at a reasonable price, and back them up with superior customer support. We are committed to providing timely, accurate, and reliable services, being recognized for integrity, and generating complete customer loyalty.

OTSI has been the leading provider of Transportation Management System software for the last 30 years. We have developed the industry’s leading software, Optivity Suite, in use by hundreds of companies across North America. The technology is sound, proven, feature rich and solid – it works as stated.

ItThe isOptivity ~~anticipated~~Suite ~~that~~is ~~any~~now ~~securities~~offered ~~issued~~as in any such reorganization would be issued in reliance on exemptions from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. Securities, including shares of the Company’s Common Stock, issued by the Company in such a ~~transaction~~Software ~~would be “restricted securities”~~ as ~~defined~~a inService ~~Rule~~(SaaS) accessed ~~144~~over ~~promulgated by~~ the ~~Securities~~internet. ~~and~~No ~~Exchange~~more ~~Commission. Under~~need ~~amendments~~ to ~~Rule~~buy ~~144~~expensive ~~recently~~hardware ~~adopted by the Commission,~~ and ~~which~~software ~~take effect on February 15, 2008, these restricted securities could not be resold under Rule 144 until the following conditions were met: the Company ceased~~ to berun ~~a shell company; it remained subject to~~ the ~~Exchange~~Transportation ~~Act~~Management ~~reporting~~Software ~~obligations;~~applications ~~filed~~in ~~all~~house. ~~required~~Also ~~Exchange Act reports during~~ the workload ~~preceding~~on 12your IT ~~months;~~staff is ~~and at least one year had elapsed from the time the Company filed “Form 10 information” reflecting the fact that it had ceased to be a shell company~~reduced. In ~~some~~All ~~circumstances,~~access ~~however, as a negotiated element of the transaction, the Company may agree~~ to ~~register such securities either at~~ the ~~time~~application ~~the transaction~~ is ~~consummated,~~via ~~under certain conditions, or at specified times thereafter. Although~~ the ~~terms of such registration rights and the number of securities~~internet, ifaccessing ~~any,~~our ~~which~~servers ~~may~~hosted bein ~~registered~~world ~~cannot~~class bedata ~~predicted,~~centers itlocated ~~may~~around ~~be expected that registration of securities by~~ the ~~Company~~globe inproviding ~~these~~24x7x365 ~~circumstances would entail substantial expense to the Company~~availability. ~~The~~ ~~issuance~~All ofdata ~~substantial~~is ~~additional~~backed ~~securities~~up ~~and~~nightly ~~their~~in ~~potential~~a ~~sale~~hardened ~~into~~archive ~~any~~for ~~trading~~easy ~~market~~access ~~that may develop~~ in ~~the~~case ~~Company’s~~of ~~securities may have a depressive effect on such market~~emergency.

~~While~~Our ~~the~~strategic ~~actual~~direction ~~terms~~is ~~of a transaction~~ to become ~~which~~ the ~~Company~~complete ~~may~~Supply beChain aManagement ~~party~~provider ~~cannot~~as bewell ~~predicted,~~as ~~it may be expected that~~ the ~~parties~~leader toin ~~the~~Supply ~~business~~Chain ~~transaction~~Execution ~~will~~in ~~find it desirable to structure~~ the ~~acquisition~~industry asfor ~~a so-called “tax-free” event under sections 351 or 368(a) of~~ the ~~Internal~~small ~~Revenue~~to ~~Code~~medium ofsized ~~1986,~~transportation ~~(the “Code”)~~companies. In ~~order~~We want to ~~obtain~~become ~~tax-free treatment under section 351 of~~ the ~~Code,~~trusted itpartner ~~would be necessary~~ for ~~the~~all ~~owners~~transportation ofmanagement ~~the~~needs ~~acquired~~from ~~business~~sourcing, ~~to own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. In such event~~intermodal, ~~the~~warehousing ~~shareholders of the Company would retain less than 20% of the issued~~ and ~~outstanding shares of the surviving entity. Section 368(a)(1) of the Code provides for tax~~sub-~~free~~assembly, ~~treatment~~local ofand ~~certain~~long ~~business~~distance ~~reorganizations between corporate entities where one corporation is merged with or acquires the securities or assets of another corporation. Generally~~delivery, ~~the~~freight ~~Company will be the acquiring corporation in such a business reorganization~~tracking, and ~~the~~all ~~tax-free~~back ~~status~~office ofoperations. ~~the~~We ~~transaction~~ will ~~not~~be ~~depend on~~ the ~~issuance~~one ofstop ~~any~~shop ~~specific amount of the Company’s voting securities. It is not uncommon, however, that as a negotiated element of a transaction completed~~ in ~~reliance~~managing onall ~~section 368, the acquiring corporation issue securities in such an amount that the shareholders~~ of ~~the~~your ~~acquired~~transportation ~~corporation~~needs. ~~will~~Our ~~hold~~Customer ~~50%~~Support staff ~~or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. Consequently, there~~ is ahere ~~substantial~~to ~~possibility~~ensure that ~~the~~your ~~shareholders~~freight ofmakes ~~the~~it ~~Company immediately prior~~ to ~~the~~its ~~transaction~~destination ~~would~~on ~~retain~~time ~~substantially less than 50% of the issued~~ and ~~outstanding~~under ~~shares of the surviving entity~~budget. ~~It is anticipated that these shareholders would in fact retain less than 5% control of the Company after a reverse acquisition.~~

~~Therefore,~~Utilizing ~~regardless of~~ the ~~form~~SaaS ofmodel ~~the~~provides ~~business~~many ~~acquisition,~~compelling itreasons ~~may~~and bebenefits ~~anticipated~~for ~~that stockholders immediately prior to~~ the ~~transaction will experience a significant reduction in their percentage of ownership in the Company~~customers.

Notwithstanding the fact that the Company is technically the acquiring entity in the foregoing circumstances, generally accepted accounting principles will ordinarily require that such transaction be accounted for as a capital transaction by the other entity owning the business and, therefore, will not permit a write-up in the carrying value of the assets of the other company.·

~~The~~Customers ~~manner~~bypass ~~in which~~ the ~~Company~~need ~~participates~~to inpurchase aexpensive ~~business~~computers ~~will~~to ~~depend~~run on the nature of the business, the respective needs and desires of the Company and other parties, the management of the business, and the relative negotiating strength of the Company and such other management.software

The Company will participate in a business only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate written agreements. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will require specific representations and warranties by all of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by each of the parties prior to such closing, will outline the manner of bearing costs if the transaction is not closed, will set forth remedies on default, and will include miscellaneous other terms.·

~~Operation~~Reduce ofthe ~~Business~~added ~~After~~burden ~~Acquisition~~on the internal Information Technology staff

The Company’s operation following its acquisition of a business will be dependent on the nature of the business and the interest acquired. It is unlikely that current shareholders would be in control of the Company or that present management would be in control of the Company following the acquisition. It may be expected that the business will present various risks, which cannot be predicted at the present time.·

Access to Optivity Suite is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with guaranteed availability

Scaling is simple and easy with a single phone call to OTMI

Initial customer cash outlay is reduced, as payments are billed on a month-to-month basis

Justification is simpler as the payments are Operational Expenses vs. Capital Expenditures

Running in SaaS eliminates the need for OTMI to support multiple computer operating systems, enabling more efficient and timely software releases and improving support for our customers

OTMI is aware, most times even before the customer, if there is a problem with the system with our advanced monitoring tools

Sales and Marketing

Our services are marketed through our internal sales force that either markets directly to the customer or through our agents. Our agents are supported with operational employees to provide support for the sales team, developing frequent contact with the customer’s traffic department, and maintaining customer service. Our agent operations rely on us for operating authority, financing, technology, and sales and marketing support. Because of our systems support and supplemental fleet of company equipment, the agent has the ability to focus on the operational and sales support aspects of the business without having to devote a part of their focus to the structure and systems necessary to support their entire operation.

Competition and Business Conditions

The logistics business is directly impacted by the volume of domestic and international trade. The volume of such trade is influenced by many factors, including economic and political conditions in the United States and abroad, major work stoppages, exchange controls, currency fluctuations, acts of war, terrorism and other armed conflicts, United States and international laws relating to tariffs, trade restrictions, foreign investments and taxation.

The global logistics services and transportation industries are intensively competitive and are expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. We will compete against other integrated logistics companies, as well as transportation services companies, consultants, information technology vendors and shippers' transportation departments. This competition is based primarily on rates, quality of service (such as damage-free shipments, on-time delivery and consistent transit times), reliable pickup and delivery and scope of operations. Most of our competitors will have substantially greater financial resources than we do.

Regulation

There are numerous transportation related regulations. Failure to comply with the applicable regulations or to maintain required permits or licenses could result in substantial fines or revocation of operating permits or authorities. We cannot give assurance as to the degree or cost of future regulations on our business. Some of the regulations affecting our current and prospective operations are described below.

~~Governmental~~The ~~Regulation~~Surface Transportation Board and U.S. Department of Transportation also have the authority to regulate interstate motor carrier operations, including the regulation of certain rates, charges and accounting systems, to require periodic financial reporting, and to regulate insurance, driver qualifications, operation of motor vehicles, parts and accessories for motor vehicle equipment, hours of service of drivers, inspection, repair, maintenance standards and other safety related matters. The federal laws governing interstate motor carriers have both direct and indirect application to the Company. The breadth and scope of the federal regulations may affect our operations and the motor carriers which are used in the provisioning of the transportation services. In certain locations, state or local permits or registrations may also be required to provide or obtain intrastate motor carrier services.

ItIn ~~is impossible to predict~~ the ~~government~~United ~~regulation~~States, ifwe ~~any,~~are ~~to which the Company may be~~ subject ~~until it has acquired an interest in a business. The use of assets and/or conduct of businesses that the Company may acquire could subject it~~ to ~~environmental~~federal, ~~public~~state ~~health~~ and ~~safety, land use, trade, or other governmental regulations and state or~~ local ~~taxation. In~~provisions ~~selecting~~relating ~~a business in which~~ to ~~acquire~~the andischarge ~~interest,~~of ~~management~~materials ~~will~~into ~~endeavor~~the toenvironment ~~ascertain,~~or tootherwise for the ~~extent~~protection of the ~~limited~~environment. ~~resources~~Similar oflaws ~~the~~apply ~~Company,~~in ~~the~~many ~~effects~~foreign ofjurisdictions ~~such~~in ~~government~~which ~~regulation~~we onmay ~~the~~operate ~~prospective~~in ~~business of~~ the ~~Company~~future. In ~~certain~~Although ~~circumstances,~~current ~~however,~~operations ~~such~~have asnot ~~the~~been ~~acquisition~~significantly ofaffected anby ~~interest~~compliance inwith athese ~~new~~environmental ~~or start-up business activity~~laws, itgovernments ~~may~~are ~~not~~becoming beincreasingly ~~possible~~sensitive to ~~predict~~environmental ~~with~~issues, ~~any~~and ~~degree~~we ofcannot ~~accuracy~~predict ~~the~~what impact offuture ~~government~~environmental ~~regulation. The~~regulations ~~inability~~may tohave ~~ascertain the effect of government regulation~~ on aour ~~prospective~~ business. ~~activity~~We ~~will~~do ~~make~~not ~~the~~anticipate ~~acquisition~~making ofany anmaterial ~~interest~~capital inexpenditures ~~such~~for ~~business~~environmental acontrol ~~higher risk~~purposes.

~~Competition~~Personnel As of the date of this Report, we have approximately 37 employees, of which 37 are full time. None of these employees are currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have experienced no work stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be good.

The Company will be involved in intense competition with other business entities, many of which will have a competitive edge over the Company by virtue of their stronger financial resources and prior experience in business. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining suitable investments.

Employees

The Company currently has no employees. Steven White, the Company’s President and principal shareholder, will devote such time to the affairs of the Company as he deems appropriate. Management of the Company expects to use consultants, attorneys, and accountants as necessary, and does not anticipate a need to engage any full- time employees so long as it is seeking and evaluating businesses. The future need for employees and their availability will be addressed in connection with a decision whether or not to acquire or participate in a specific business industry.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

AsRISKS aPARTICULAR ~~smaller~~TO ~~reporting~~OUR ~~company,~~BUSINESS ~~we have elected not to provide the information required by this item.~~

~~ITEM~~We ~~1B.~~are ~~UNRESOLVED~~largely ~~STAFF~~dependent ~~COMMENTS~~on the efforts of agents to generate our revenue and service our customers.

~~Because~~Currently wesome ~~are~~of ~~neither~~our anrevenue ~~accelerated~~is ~~filer~~generated orthrough a ~~large~~network ~~accelerated~~of ~~filer,~~agents ~~nor~~located athroughout ~~well~~North America. Although our managers have long-~~known~~term ~~seasoned~~relationships ~~issuer~~with these agents, our agency agreements are generally terminable by either party subject to requisite notice provisions that are generally30 days. The loss of one or more of these agents could negatively impact our ability to retain and service our customers. We will need to expand our existing relationships and enter into new relationships in order to increase our current and future market share and revenue. We cannot be certain that we ~~have~~will ~~elected~~be ~~not~~able to ~~provide~~maintain ~~the~~and ~~information~~expand ~~required~~our byexisting ~~this~~relationships ~~item~~or enter into new relationships, or that any new relationships will be available on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to maintain and expand our existing relationships or enter into new relationships, we may lose customers, customer introductions and co-marketing benefits and our operating results may suffer.

We might fail to develop and integrate information technology systems or fail to upgrade or replace our information technology systems to handle increased volumes and levels of demand or avoid disruptions of our operations, resulting in a loss of business.

We compete in our industry with the ability to be flexible, sophisticated and provide the security of the information technology systems supporting our services. Hardware or software failure to support our information technology systems, or the loss of data contained in the systems or the inability to access or interact with our web site or connect electronically, could significantly disrupt our operations. Our information technology systems must be able to handle additional volume for our operations as our business and scope of services increase. If we do not hire qualified persons to implement, maintain and protect our information technology systems or we do not upgrade or replace outdated or ineffective information technology systems we may lose suffer a loss in our business.

The industry is consolidating and if we fail to gain sufficient size in our industry, we may not have the ability to compete successfully against larger, global companies.

The current trend within the industry is towards consolidation, to create larger companies with increased global operations by way of acquisition of regional and local transportation operations. If we cannot gain sufficient market presence or otherwise establish a successful strategy in our industry, we may not be able to compete successfully against larger companies in our industry with global operations.

Our present capital constraints may limit the implementation of our business strategy.

The objective of our business strategy is to build a full service supply chain logistics company. As part of this strategy, it is our intention to acquire a number of select companies that fit our business plan, and to enable us to grow geographically, or to diversify our services and operations. Currently our financial resources are limited, which may inhibit our growth through acquisitions.

Dependence on key personnel.

For the foreseeable future our success will depend largely on the continued services of our Chief Executive Officer, Kevin P. Brennan, and our Chief Operating Officer, Larry M. Berry, as well as certain other employees, because of their collective industry knowledge, marketing skills and relationships with major vendors and owners of our exclusive agent stations. Should any of these individuals leave the Company, it could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect any market on which our shares trade, the markets in which we operate, our operations and our profitability.

Terrorist acts or acts of war or armed conflict could negatively affect our operations in a number of ways. Primarily, any of these acts could result in increased volatility in or damage to the U.S. and worldwide financial markets and economy and could lead to increased regulatory requirements with respect to the security and safety of freight shipments and transportation. They could also result in a continuation of the current economic uncertainty in the United States and abroad. Acts of terrorism or armed conflict, and the uncertainty caused by such conflicts, could cause an overall reduction in worldwide sales of goods and corresponding shipments of goods. This would have a corresponding negative effect on our operations. Also, terrorist activities similar to the type experienced on September 11, 2001 could result in another halt of trading of securities, which could also have an adverse effect on the trading price of our shares and overall market capitalization.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR ACQUISITION STRATEGY

Risks related to acquisition financing.

Our acquisition will require us to obtain additional financing. We intend to obtain such financing through a combination of traditional debt financing or the placement of debt and equity securities. We may finance some portion of our future acquisitions by either issuing equity or by using shares of our common stock for all or a portion of the purchase price for such businesses. In the event that our common stock does not attain or maintain a sufficient market value, or potential acquisition candidates are otherwise unwilling to accept common stock as part of the purchase price for the sale of their businesses, we may be required to utilize more of our cash resources, if available, in order to maintain our acquisition program. If we do not have sufficient cash resources, we will not be able to complete acquisitions and our growth could be limited unless we are able to obtain additional capital through debt or equity financings.

We may be required to incur a significant amount of indebtedness in order to successfully implement our acquisition strategy.

We may be required to incur a significant amount of indebtedness in order to complete future acquisitions. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow from the operations of acquired companies to make scheduled payments of principal and interest on the indebtedness, then we will be required to use our capital for such payments. This will restrict our ability to make additional acquisitions. We may also be forced to sell an acquired company in order to satisfy indebtedness. We cannot be certain that we will be able to operate profitably once we incur this indebtedness or that we will be able to generate a sufficient amount of proceeds from the ultimate disposition of such acquired companies to repay the indebtedness incurred to make these acquisitions.

We may experience difficulties in integrating the operations, personnel and assets of companies that we acquire which may disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results.

Our business plan is to acquire businesses and assets in the transportation and logistics industry. We have only made a limited number of acquisitions and, therefore, our ability to complete such acquisitions and integrate any acquired businesses into our operations is unproven. Increased competition for acquisition candidates may develop, in which event there may be fewer acquisition opportunities available to us as well as higher acquisition prices. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage businesses or successfully integrate acquired businesses into the Company without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial problems. Such acquisitions also involve numerous operational risks, as a result, if we fail to properly evaluate and execute any acquisitions or investments, our business and prospects may be seriously harmed.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law may make a contested takeover of our Company more difficult.

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) could deter a change in our management or render more difficult an attempt to obtain control of us, even if such a proposal is favored by a majority of our stockholders. For example, we are subject to the provisions of the DGCL that prohibit a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a broad range of business combinations with a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting shares (an “interested stockholder”) for three years after the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner.

Trading in our common stock has been limited and there is no significant trading market for our common stock.

Our common stock is currently eligible to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, however, trading to date has been limited. Trading on the OTC Bulletin Board is often characterized by low trading volume and significant price fluctuations. Because of this limited liquidity, stockholders may be unable to sell their shares. The trading price of our shares may from time to time fluctuate widely. The trading price may be affected by a number of factors including events described in the risk factors set forth in this report as well as our operating results, financial condition, announcements, general conditions in the industry, and other events or factors. In recent years, broad stock market indices, in general, and smaller capitalization companies, in particular, have experienced substantial price fluctuations. In a volatile market, we may experience wide fluctuations in the market price of our common stock. These fluctuations may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

The influx of additional shares of our common stock onto the market may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock.

We have issued restrictive stock in our acquisition. The availability of those shares for sale to the public under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and sale of such shares in public markets could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. Such an adverse effect on the market price would make it more difficult for us to sell our equity securities in the future at prices which we deem appropriate or to use our shares as currency for future acquisitions which will make it more difficult to execute our acquisition strategy.

The issuance of additional shares in connection with current and other potential acquisitions may result in additional dilution to our existing stockholders.

We have issued shares of common stock or common stock equivalents in payment of the purchase price of companies we have acquired. This will have the effect of further increasing the number of shares outstanding. In connection with future acquisitions, we may undertake the issuance of more shares of common stock without notice to our then existing stockholders. We may also issue additional shares in order to, among other things, compensate employees or consultants or for other valid business reasons in the discretion of our Board of Directors, and could result in diluting the interests of our existing stockholders.

As we do not anticipate paying dividends, investors in our shares will not receive any dividend income.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any dividends that we may pay in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our future earnings, any applicable regulatory considerations, covenants of our debt facility, our financial requirements and other similarly unpredictable factors. Accordingly, investors seeking dividend income should not purchase our stock.

We are not subject to certain corporate governance provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Since our common stock is not listed for trading on a national securities exchange, we are not subject to certain of the corporate governance requirements established by the national securities exchanges pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These include rules relating to independent directors, and independent director nomination, audit and compensation committees. Unless we voluntarily elect to comply with those obligations, investors in our shares will not have the protections offered by those corporate governance provisions. As of the date of this report, we have not elected to comply with any regulations that do not apply to us. While we may make an application to have our securities listed for trading on a national securities exchange, which would require us to comply with those obligations, we can not assure that we will do so or that such application will be approved.

We will be required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and if we fail to comply in a timely manner, our business could be harmed and our stock price could decline.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

~~The~~Our ~~Company~~principal ~~has~~executive nooffices ~~office~~are ~~facilities~~located ~~and~~at ~~does~~707 ~~not~~Grant ~~presently~~Street, ~~anticipate~~Suite ~~the~~2307, ~~need~~Pittsburgh, toPennsylvania ~~lease~~and ~~commercial~~consist ~~office~~of ~~space~~approximately or1,800 ~~facilities. For~~feet ~~now~~of ~~the~~ office ofspace ~~Steven~~which ~~White,~~we ~~the~~lease ~~President~~for ~~and~~approximately ~~principal shareholder~~$2,600 isper ~~being~~month ~~used~~pursuant asto the ~~Company address. The Company may~~ lease ~~commercial~~expiring ~~office~~November ~~facilities~~30,2013. inWe ~~the~~also ~~future~~maintain atapproximately ~~such~~6,000 ~~time~~feet asof ~~operations~~warehouse ~~have~~space ~~developed~~in toHanging ~~the~~Rock ~~point where the facilities are needed~~Ohio, ~~but~~which ~~has~~we nolease ~~commitments~~on ora ~~arrangements~~month ~~for~~to ~~any~~month ~~facilities~~basis. ~~There~~ isWe nobelieve ~~assurance~~our ~~regarding~~current ~~the~~offices ~~future~~are ~~availability~~adequately ofcovered ~~commercial~~by ~~office~~insurance ~~facilities~~and orare ~~terms~~sufficient ~~on which the Company may be able~~ to ~~lease~~support ~~facilities~~our inoperations ~~the~~for ~~future, nor any assurance regarding~~ the ~~length~~foreseeable ~~of time the present arrangement may continue~~future.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

NoFrom ~~legal~~time ~~proceedings~~to time, our operating subsidiaries are ~~reportable~~involved ~~pursuant~~in tolegal ~~this~~matters ~~item~~or named as a defendant in legal actions arising in its ordinary course of business. Management believes that these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

~~No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Company during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008~~None.

PART II

Market Information

~~The~~Our ~~Company’s~~common ~~Common~~stock ~~Stock~~currently ~~was~~trades ~~approved for quotation~~ on the OTC Bulletin Board onunder ~~December~~the ~~10,~~symbol ~~2008~~“OPTZ. No” ~~shares~~The ~~are~~following ~~believed~~table tostates ~~have traded since~~ the ~~approval~~range of the ~~quotation. The~~high ~~Common~~and ~~Stock~~low isbid-prices ~~also~~per ~~quoted~~share onof ~~the~~our ~~Pink~~common ~~Sheets. The~~stock ~~trading symbol~~ for ~~the~~each ~~Common~~of ~~Stock is “UREM.” The table below sets forth for~~ the ~~period~~calendar ~~indicated~~quarters ~~the~~during ~~quarterly~~our ~~high~~past ~~and~~two ~~low~~fiscal ~~bid~~years, ~~prices~~ as reported by the ~~Pink~~OTC ~~Sheets;~~Bulletin noBoard. ~~bid~~Our ~~prices~~stock ~~were~~began ~~published until fourth quarter of 2008 and~~ trading, ~~did~~under ~~not~~our ~~commence~~assigned ~~until~~symbol, ~~first~~in ~~quarter~~August of 2009. These quotations ~~reflect~~represent inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, ~~mark-down~~markdown, or commission, and may not ~~necessarily~~ represent actual transactions. The last price of our common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on March 30, 2010, was $0.22 per share.

	Quarter	High	Low
		High		Low
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008	Fourth	$0.10	$0.10
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Quarter ended December 31, 2009		$	1.11	$	0.05
Quarter ended September 30, 2009			0.51		0.06
Quarter ended June 30, 2009			---		---
Quarter ended March 31, 2009			---		---
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
Quarter ended December 31, 2008		$	---	$	---
Quarter ended September 30, 2008			---		---
Quarter ended June 30, 2008			---		---
Quarter ended March 31, 2008			---		---

The Company’s Common Stock is considered to be penny stock under rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, broker-dealers participating in transactions in these securities must first deliver a risk disclosure document which describes risks associated with these stocks, broker-dealers’ duties, customers’ rights and remedies, market and other information, and make suitability determinations approving the customers for these stock transactions based on financial situation, investment experience and objectives. Broker-dealers must also disclose these restrictions in writing, provide monthly account statements to customers, and obtain specific written consent of each customer. With these restrictions, the likely effect of designation as a penny stock is to decrease the willingness of broker- dealers to make a market for the stock, to decrease the liquidity of the stock and increase the transaction cost of sales and purchases of these stocks compared to other securities.

The Company has been a shell company since approximately December 31, 2003. As a result, we are subject to the provisions of Rule 144(i) which limit reliance on the Rule by shareholders owning stock in a shell company. Under current interpretations, unregistered shares issued after the Company became a shell company could not be resold under Rule 144 until the following conditions were met: we ceased to be a shell company; we remained subject to the Exchange Act reporting obligations; we filed all required Exchange Act reports during the preceding 12 months; and at least one year had elapsed from the time we filed “Form 10 information” reflecting the fact that we had ceased to be a shell company.

Outstanding Warrants

As of December 31, 2008, we had 536,000 shares of common stock subject to outstanding warrants to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.0625 per share. The warrants are fully vested and are exercisable for shares of our common stock at any time prior to April 28, 2015.

Holders

AtAs of December 31, ~~2008~~2009, the ~~Company~~number ~~had 65 shareholders~~ of ~~record. The~~stockholders ~~number~~ of record ~~holders was determined from the records~~ of ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~common ~~transfer~~stock ~~agent~~was ~~and does not include beneficial owners of Common Stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies~~86. ~~The~~ ~~Company has appointed Interwest Transfer Company, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, to act as its transfer agent for the Common Stock.~~

~~Dividends~~Dividend Policy

~~The~~We ~~Company~~have ~~has~~ not ~~declared or~~ paid any cash dividends on ~~its~~our ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock ~~during~~to ~~the~~date, ~~two~~and ~~fiscal~~we ~~years~~have ~~ended~~no ~~December~~intention ~~31,~~of ~~2008,~~paying orcash dividends in ~~any~~the ~~subsequent~~foreseeable ~~period~~future. ~~The~~ ~~Company~~Whether ~~does~~we ~~not~~declare ~~anticipate~~and orpay ~~contemplate~~dividends ~~paying~~will ~~dividends~~be ondetermined ~~its~~by ~~Common~~our ~~Stock~~board inof ~~the~~directors ~~foreseeable~~at ~~future~~their discretion, subject to certain limitations imposed under Delaware law. The ~~only~~timing, ~~restrictions~~amount ~~that~~and ~~limit~~form ~~the~~of ~~ability~~dividends, toif ~~pay~~any, ~~dividends~~will depend on, ~~common~~among ~~equity~~other things, orour ~~that~~results ~~are~~of ~~likely~~operations, tofinancial docondition, socash inrequirements ~~the~~and ~~future,~~other ~~are~~factors ~~those~~deemed ~~restrictions~~relevant ~~imposed~~ by ~~law~~our Board of Directors.

~~Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans~~11

AsTransfer ofAgent ~~December 31, 2008, we had not adopted any compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities of the Company were authorized for issuance.~~

9Island Stock Transfer Company, 100 Second Avenue South, Suite 7055, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, serves as our transfer agent.

~~Purchases~~Preferred ~~of Equity Securities~~Stock

~~There~~The ~~were~~Company nois ~~purchases~~authorized ~~made~~to ~~during~~issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value at $.001 per share. On June 30, 2009, the ~~fourth~~Company ~~quarter~~issued 700,000 shares of ~~the~~Series ~~fiscal~~A ~~year~~Convertible ~~ended~~Preferred ~~December~~Stock 31(“Series A Preferred Stock”) and 500,000 ~~2008~~shares of Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”) as part of the acquisition of Federal Logistics, byInc. or(FL) onand ~~behalf~~Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. (OTSI), becoming wholly-owned subsidiaries of ~~our~~the Company. orAt ~~any~~various ~~affiliated~~times ~~purchaser~~throughout ofthe ~~shares~~current orquarter ~~other~~ended ~~units~~September 30, 2009, the Company issued 350,000 shares of ~~any~~Series ~~class~~A Convertible Preferred Stock and 1,000,000 shares of ~~our~~Series ~~equity~~B ~~securities~~Preferred ~~registered~~Stock ~~pursuant~~to various consultants for services they provided the Company. Series A is convertible to ~~Section~~common 12on a ten for one basis. Each share of ~~the~~preferred ~~Exchange~~stock ~~Act~~is entitled to ten votes. Neither series has redemption, dividend, or liquidation rights.

Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value at $.001 per share. On June 30, 2009 the Company issued 5,500,000 shares of common stock to purchase 100% of the outstanding shares of Federal Logistics, Inc. (FL) and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. (OTSI). Prior to the transaction, the Registrant had a total of 6,165,073 shares issued and outstanding, of which 3,665,073 were cancelled at the closing, resulting in a total number of outstanding common shares post closing of 8,000,000.

In connection with the transaction, the Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with certain pre-closing holders of common stock of the Company, with no monetary penalties.

In July 2009, the 5,500,000 shares issued for the purchase of Federal Logistics, Inc. (FL) and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. (OTSI) was returned to the Company as payment of debt owed the Company. The shares were subsequently canceled.

On July 31, 2009 the Company established the Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan to attract, retain and motivate employees of the Company, to encourage employees, directors and independent contractors to acquire an equity interest in the Company, to make monetary payments to certain employees based upon the value of the Company’s Stock and provide employees, directors and independent contractors with an incentive to maximize the success of the Company and to further the interests of the shareholders. Five million (5,000,000) shares of Stock (the "Maximum Plan Shares") are reserved and subject to issuance under the Plan. To date we have issued two million four hundred and fifty thousand (2,450,000) shares.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a smaller reporting company, we have elected not to provide the information required by this item. Selected financial data has been provided in ITEM 7.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and result of operations should be read in conjunction with ~~our~~the consolidated financial statements and the related notes ~~thereto~~and asother information included ~~with~~elsewhere in this report.

~~Years~~Overview ~~Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007~~

WeThe ~~have~~Company atis ~~December~~driving ~~31,~~to ~~2008,~~be ~~$708 available cash on hand and have~~ a ~~cumulative~~total ~~deficit~~solution provider of ~~$2,160,527. We~~supply ~~did~~chain ~~not~~execution ~~generate~~software ~~any~~and ~~revenues~~services orto ~~have~~our ~~operations~~target ~~either~~market ~~during~~of ~~the~~manufacturers ~~years ended December 31, 2008,~~ and ~~2007~~distributors. ~~Net~~ ~~loss~~The ~~during~~mission ~~the~~is ~~year ended December 31, 2008, was $44,172 compared~~ to ~~$37,631~~provide ~~for year ended December 31, 2007. Expenses for~~ the ~~year~~most ~~ended December 31~~efficient, ~~2008~~reliable, ~~consisted~~easy-to-use ofsupply ~~general~~chain ~~and~~management ~~administrative~~system ~~expenses of $42,573 and interest expense of $1,599. Expenses~~ for the ~~year~~midsized ~~ended December 31~~market, ~~2007,~~at ~~consisted~~an ofaffordable ~~general and administrative expenses of $30~~price,~~550~~ ~~and~~backed ~~interest~~by ~~expense~~superior ofcustomer ~~$7,081~~support. ~~The~~ ~~general and administrative expenses during 2008 were primarily due to professional, legal, and accounting fees associated with our public filings.~~

We plan on achieving these goals through organic growth and acquisition.

The current Supply Chain Management (SCM ) and Supply Chain Execution (SCE) markets are highly fragmented with many vendor companies only focusing on a small segment of the overall supply chain. Some of the larger competitors supply either the software or the transportation management processes in the chain and cater primarily to the Fortune 1000 market with much higher costs. However, in today’s economy, most companies are attempting to do more with less. We believe there is a current unserved market for SCM and SCE for midsized manufacturing and distribution companies. The Company feels it can capitalize on this unmet need, by marketing ever increasing parts of the supply chain to our large base of customers for quick and enhanced market entry.

Our supply chain operation will consist of the following components:

•

Freight Agents - Ground Transportation of freight via Truck (48 States)

•

Warehousing Agents - Storage and sub-assembly of Customer inventory

•

Intermodal Agents - Containers transporting freight between rail, ship or air

•

Freight Forwarding Agents - Manages freight between ports of entry

•

OTSI - Software service that helps customers manages and track their freight and assets throughout the supply chain

Our business plan is to build a full service supply chain logistics company by developing a management system for midsized manufacturers and distributors, and providing the necessary transportation services to complement the system thereby meeting 100% of our customer’s logistical needs. We plan on achieving these goals through organic growth, and acquisition of historically profitable businesses, that fill the various niches of the supply chain. Toward that we have identified and are pursuing the acquisition of historically profitable companies we feel will allow us to complete our plan.

We are a supply chain Logistics Company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Our operations are conducted through our two wholly owned subsidiaries, Federal Logistics, Inc. (FL) and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. (OTSI). FL is engaged in the business of global supply chain management. The Company currently operates a domestic logistics business. The Company is a non-asset based logistics company providing domestic logistics management services through a network of agent offices across North America. FL has a diversified account base, including manufacturers, distributors and retailers using a network of independent carriers throughout North America

OTSI has been a provider of Transportation Management System software for the last 3 years. The Company has developed software, Optivity Suite, in use by hundreds of companies across North America. The technology is sound, proven, feature rich and solid.

The Optivity Suite is now an application accessed over the internet, eliminating the need to buy expensive hardware and software to run the Transportation Management Software applications in house, also reducing the need for extra IT personnel. All access to the application is via the internet, accessing our servers hosted in world class data centers located around the globe providing 24x7x365 availability. All data is backed up nightly in a hardened archive for easy access in case of emergency.

OTSI is driving to become the complete Supply Chain Management provider as well as the leader in Supply Chain Execution in the industry for the small to medium sized manufacturers, retailers, and distributors. The Company intends to become our customer’s trusted partner for all their supply chain management needs from sourcing, intermodal, warehousing and sub-assembly, local and long distance delivery, freight tracking, and all back office operations. OTSI will be the one stop shop in managing all of our customer supply chain needs. Our support staff is here to ensure that our customer’s inventory and / or products make it to its destination on time and under budget.

Performance Metrics

Our principal source of income is derived from our agents providing freight dispatch services to our customers. Our agents negotiate with our customers a cost for the movement of their freight. Our agents then arrange the assignment of our customer’s freight to a trucking company and we assume the payment of that negotiated cost. Our revenue represents the total dollar value of services we charge to our customers. Our transportation cost is the direct cost of transportation charged by the motor carrier.

As it is our intent to continue to grow by way of strategic acquisitions, the operating results of the Company will be affected as acquisitions occur. Since all acquisitions are generally made using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, our financial statements will only include the results of operations and cash flows of acquired companies for periods subsequent to the date of acquisition.

Financial Outlook

Our revenues increased approximately $1 million or 10.2%, in the year ended December 31, 20099. For 2010, we expect our continued network expansion and recent acquisition to offset the impact of the slowing global economy. Over the longer term, we expect to continue growing our revenues both organically and as the result of strategic acquisitions. Our primary operating objective in fiscal 2010 is to continue to expand our brands while leveraging the substantial purchasing power of the consolidated group. We expect this will translate into improved profitability and strategic advantage for all of our stations.

Our estimate of future revenues and profits is based on the assumption that the cumulative historical financial results of operations for the most recent 12 months ended December 31, 2009 are indicative of the future financial performance of the consolidated group and excludes the impact of further acquisitions.

Critical Accounting Policies

Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management’s current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods and estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ from management’s current judgments. While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates that affect our financial statements, the areas that are particularly significant include the assessment of the recoverability of long-lived assets, specifically goodwill, acquired intangibles, and revenue recognition.

We review long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, we estimated fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

As a non-asset based carrier, the Company does not own transportation assets. The Company generates the major portion of its freight revenues by purchasing transportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to its customers. We recognize revenue on a transportation shipment when delivered and record estimated costs related to that shipment based on the paperwork received by us at delivery.

We recognize revenue for our software division as we bill monthly maintenance fees.

Results of Operations

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 compared to fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

Overview


	(000's) omitted

	For the Years Ended
	December 31,						Change
	2009			2008			Amount		Percent

Revenue	$	6,814	$		3,678	$		3,136		85.3%
Cost of transportation		5,851			3,169			2,682		84.6%
		963			509			454		89.2%
		14.1%			13.8%					0.3%

Selling, general and administrative expenses		838			482			356		73.9%
Operating income		125			27			98		1318.5%
		1.8%			0.7%

Revenue

We generated revenue of $6.8 million and net revenue of $963 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to revenue of $3.7 million and net revenue of $500 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2008. Operating income was $125 thousand and $27 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Revenues increased through the acquisition and organic growth of our customer base. Revenues consist of transportation revenue, generated from carriers, of $6.6 million and $3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Revenues generated through logistic software was $177 thousand and $385 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decreased by $208 thousand, due to reduced corporate investment during the economic downturn.

Costs of Transportation

Cost of transportation was 85.9% and 86.2% of transportation revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in cost of transportation result in improved net transportation margins, 14.1% and 13.8% of transportation revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The favorable variance was due to a lower gas prices in 2009.

Transportation costs consist of:

Carrier and fuel costs were $5.1 million and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase was due to an increase in volume and reductions in fuel costs.

Agent commissions were $676 thousand and $469 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, an increase of $207 thousand as a direct result of increased revenues.

Personnel costs consist of payroll, payroll taxes, benefits and stock compensation expense. Personnel costs were $568 thousand and $471 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase of $97 thousand was largely due to revenue volume.

Selling, general and administrative

Selling, general and administrative costs, consists primarily of marketing, rent, professional services, insurance and travel expenses. Selling, general and administrative costs were $838 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2009, a increase of $356 thousand or 73.9% from $482 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was not attributable to any specific category of expense and was a result additional costs incurred to support the increase in revenue demand.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

AtNet ~~December~~cash ~~31,~~used ~~2008,~~in weoperating ~~had~~activities ~~$708~~for inthe ~~available~~year ~~cash~~ended onDecember ~~hand~~31, ~~and~~2009 was $18175 thousand,~~173~~ incompared ~~liabilities,~~to ~~including~~net ~~$13,051~~cash ofprovided ~~accrued~~by ~~expenses,~~operating ~~$5,122~~activities infor athe ~~related~~year ~~party~~ended ~~shareholder~~December ~~advance~~31, ~~and~~2008 ~~accrued~~of ~~interest~~$184 thousand. We ~~had~~The achange ~~working~~was ~~capital~~principally ~~deficit~~driven ofby ~~$17,465~~the atreduction ~~December~~in ~~31, 2008~~liabilities.

WeNet ~~anticipate~~cash ~~our~~used ~~expenses~~ for ~~the~~investing ~~next~~was ~~twelve months will be~~ approximately $20175,000~~. At~~ ~~the present time management does not believe the Company has sufficient working capital to meet its needs~~ for the year ~~ending~~ended December 31, 2009~~. Therefore~~, ~~management~~compared ~~will~~to ~~seek financing through loans or sale of common stock. In September 2008 the president advanced the Company~~ $560,000, ~~and~~for ~~in March 2009~~ the ~~company~~year ~~received~~ended anDecember ~~additional $5~~31,~~600~~ ~~from the president, or a company owned by him~~2008. ~~Management~~ ~~anticipates~~Use ~~that~~of itcash ~~will~~for ~~rely~~the onnine ~~further~~months ~~advances~~ended ~~from~~September ~~our president~~30, or2009 ~~shareholders,~~consisted toprimarily ~~meet~~of ~~the~~additional ~~Company’s~~software ~~short-term~~development ~~cash needs~~costs. ~~However, the Company has no agreements to that effect.~~

~~Our~~Net ~~need~~cash ~~for~~provided ~~capital~~by ~~may~~financing ~~change~~activities ~~dramatically~~for ifthe weyear ~~acquire~~ended anDecember ~~interest in a business opportunity during that period. Although we have entered into negotiations with a company~~31, we2009 ~~currently~~was ~~have no understandings~~$380,000 ~~commitments~~compared ~~or agreements with respect~~ to ~~the acquisition of any business venture~~$318,000 ~~and~~used ~~there can be no assurance that we will identify a business venture suitable~~ for ~~acquisition in~~ the ~~future. Further,~~year weended ~~cannot~~December ~~assure~~31, ~~that~~2008. weCash ~~will~~from befinancing ~~successful~~activities in ~~consummating~~2009 ~~any~~consisted ~~acquisition~~primarily onof ~~favorable~~proceeds ~~terms or that we will be able to profitably manage any business venture we acquire. Should we require additional capital, we may seek additional advances~~ from ~~officers,~~stockholder ~~sell~~lending ~~common~~and ~~stock~~private orsale ~~find other forms~~ of ~~debt~~our ~~financing~~stock.

~~Our~~Credit current operating plan is to continue searching for potential businesses, products, technologies and companies for acquisition and to handle the administrative and reporting requirements of a public company.Facility

~~Off-Balance~~The ~~Sheet~~Company ~~Arrangements~~outsources certain of its accounts receivables under a trade credit outsourcing agreement with a third party. The third party assumes credit risk for the accounts they purchase under the agreements and charges the company certain administration fees for handling the collections of these accounts. In addition the Company is allowed to take advances up to one million dollars limited by 85% of eligible receivables. Advances under the line of credit are available to fund acquisitions, capital expenditures, or for other corporate purposes. The line of credit is collateralized by accounts receivable and other assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at the Bank’s prime rate plus 2.00% and are due on demand.

~~During~~Off ~~the~~Balance ~~years~~Sheet ~~ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements.~~Arrangements

~~ITEM~~We 7Adid not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which had been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. ~~QUANTITATIVE~~As ~~AND~~such, ~~QUALITATIVE~~we ~~DISCLOSURES~~are ~~ABOUT~~not ~~MARKET~~materially ~~RISK~~exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

AsRecent aAccounting ~~smaller~~Pronouncements ~~reporting company, we have elected not to provide the disclosure required by this item.~~

We have reviewed accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration. Those standards have been addressed in the notes to the audited financial statement and in our Annual Report, filed on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The consolidated financial statements ~~required~~of ~~pursuant~~Optimized toTransportation ~~this~~Management, ~~item~~Inc. ~~are~~including ~~included~~the ~~immediately~~notes ~~following~~thereto and the ~~signature~~report ~~page~~ of our independent accountants are included in this report, commencing at page F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

~~There have been no changes in or disagreements with accountants reportable pursuant to this item~~None.

ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

AsDisclosure aControls ~~smaller~~and ~~reporting~~Procedures ~~company, we have elected not to provide the information required by this item~~. ~~Rather,~~ ~~we have provided the information set forth in Item 9A(T) below.~~

~~ITEM~~An 9Aevaluation of the effectiveness of our "disclosure controls and procedures" (Tas such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2009 was carried out by our management under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") who also serves as our Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") and the President. ~~CONTROLS~~ ~~AND~~Based ~~PROCEDURES~~upon that evaluation, our CEO/CFO and President concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO/CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

~~Evaluation~~Management’s ofReport ~~disclosure~~on ~~controls~~Internal ~~and~~Control ~~procedures~~over Financial Reporting .

Our ~~President,~~management ~~who~~is ~~serves~~responsible asfor ~~our~~establishing ~~principal~~and ~~executive~~maintaining ~~officer~~adequate ~~and~~internal ~~our~~control ~~principal~~over financial ~~officer,~~reporting ~~after evaluating the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (~~as defined in ~~the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~ Rule 13a-15(ef)) as of the ~~end~~Securities ofExchange ~~the~~Act ~~period~~of ~~covered~~1934 ~~by this Annual Report on Form 10-K~~ (the “~~Evaluation~~Exchange ~~Date~~Act”),. ~~has~~Our ~~concluded~~internal ~~that~~control assystem ofwas ~~the~~designed ~~Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective~~ to provide reasonable assurance ~~that~~regarding ~~information~~the wereliability ~~are~~of ~~required~~financial toreporting ~~disclose~~and inthe ~~reports~~preparation ~~that~~of wefinancial ~~file~~reporting orand ~~submit~~the ~~under~~preparation ~~the~~of ~~Exchange~~financial ~~Act~~statements isfor ~~recorded,~~external ~~processed~~purposes, ~~summarized~~in ~~and~~accordance ~~reported~~with ~~within~~generally ~~the~~accepted ~~time~~accounting ~~periods~~procedures ~~specified~~(“GAAP”). inBecause ~~the~~of ~~Securities~~its ~~and~~inherent ~~Exchange~~limitations, ~~Commission~~internal ~~rules~~control ~~and~~over ~~forms,~~financial ~~and~~reporting ~~that~~may ~~such~~not ~~information~~prevent isor ~~accumulated~~detect ~~and~~misstatements. ~~communicated~~Also, toprojections ~~our~~of ~~management,~~any ~~including~~evaluation ~~our~~of ~~principal~~effectiveness ~~executive~~to ~~and~~future ~~financial~~periods ~~officer,~~are assubject ~~appropriate,~~ to ~~allow~~the ~~timely~~risk ~~decisions~~that ~~regarding~~controls ~~required~~may ~~disclosure~~become ~~due~~inadequate tobecause ~~material~~of ~~weaknesses~~changes in ~~our~~conditions, ~~internal~~or ~~control. A~~that ~~discussion of~~ the ~~material~~degree ~~weaknesses~~of incompliance ~~our~~with ~~disclosure~~the ~~controls~~policies ~~and~~or procedures ismay ~~set forth below~~deteriorate.

~~Changes~~Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer who also serves as of our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2009.

~~There~~This ~~were~~annual noreport ~~changes~~does innot include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. ~~during~~Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our ~~most~~registered ~~recent~~public ~~fiscal~~accounting ~~quarter~~firm ~~that~~pursuant ~~materially~~to ~~affected,~~temporary orrules ~~were~~of ~~reasonably~~the ~~likely~~Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to ~~materially~~provide ~~affect,~~only ~~our~~management’s ~~internal~~report ~~control~~in ~~over~~this ~~financial~~annual ~~reporting~~report.

~~Management’s~~Changes ~~report~~in onInternal ~~internal~~Control ~~control~~Over ~~over~~Financial ~~financial~~Reporting ~~reporting~~.

~~Our~~No ~~management~~change ~~consists~~in ~~solely of Steven White,~~ our ~~Chief~~system ~~Executive~~of ~~Officer (“CEO”) and our Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”), who is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate~~ internal control over financial reporting, asoccurred ~~such~~during ~~term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of~~ the ~~Exchange~~period ~~Act. As~~covered aby ~~result~~this report, ~~our~~fourth ~~internal~~quarter ~~control~~of ~~system~~the isfiscal ~~limited~~year inended ~~its~~December ~~scope and capabilities~~31, ~~although,~~2009 ~~based~~that onhas ~~our~~materially ~~CEO/PFO’s general business experience~~affected, or is ~~designed~~reasonably likely to ~~provide~~materially ~~reasonable~~affect, ~~assurance~~our ~~regarding~~internal ~~the~~control ~~reliability~~over of financial reporting ~~and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles~~.

Because of inherent limitations of having a single officer and director, our system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Our management, including our sole executive and accounting officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on his evaluation, he concluded that there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

This material weakness relates to the monitoring and review of work performed by our CEO, who also acts as our principal financial officer in the preparation of financial statements, footnotes and financial data provided to the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the annual audit. All of our financial reporting is carried out by our CEO/PFO, and we do not have an audit committee. This lack of accounting staff results in a lack of segregation of duties and accounting technical expertise necessary for an effective system of internal control.

Since our Company has no ongoing operations and is, at this time, a “blank check” or “shell” company, as defined in the Securities Act, we are making an effort to mitigate this material weakness to the fullest extent possible. This is done by having our CEO/PFO review all of our financial reporting requirements for reasonableness. All unexpected results are investigated. At any time, if it appears that any control can be implemented to continue to mitigate such weaknesses, it will be immediately implemented. As soon as our finances allow, we plan to hire sufficient accounting staff and implement appropriate procedures for monitoring and review of work performed by our CEO/PFO.

Based on our evaluation under the frameworks described above, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2008.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

~~The Company did not fail to file any information required to be filed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008~~None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

~~Current~~Below ~~Management~~is certain information regarding our directors and executive officers.

~~The following table sets forth the name and ages of, and position or positions held by, our sole executive officer and director~~16

Name	Age	Position(s)	Director Since	Employment Background
Steven White	54	Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer	2008	Mr. White earned his Bachelor of Science Degree from Brigham Young University in 1980 with a major in accounting and a minor in English. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and has been employed by firms located in Utah and Colorado. Since 1983, Mr. White has been employed in private accounting and has been the controller of several small businesses. He has been the owner and president and director of Sparrow, Inc., a small consulting business from 2000 to present; the president and director of eNutrition, Inc., from 2000 to 2003, a publicly traded company which sold nutritional products; the president and director of Excel Publishing, Inc., a publicly traded small publishing company from the fall of 2002 to the spring of 2003; the president and director of New Horizon Education, Inc., a publicly traded educational software company from 1998 to 2003; and the controller and chief financial officer of Phoenix Ink, LLC, a financial newsletter publisher, from 1999 to 2001. Mr. White is currently serving as a director of USATCO, Inc., Millstream Ventures, Inc., and United Restaurant Management, Inc., each of which is a reporting company. On November 17, 2006, Mr. White, on behalf of and as president of Liquitek Enterprises, Inc., a Nevada corporation, filed in United States Bankruptcy Court District of Nevada, a petition of bankruptcy under Chapter 11, which on August 24, 2007, was subsequently dismissed. Mr. White became the president of Liquitek Enterprises, Inc. on September 15, 2006. Liquitek Enterprises, Inc. is not an affiliate of our company and Mr. White is no longer an officer or director of Liquitek Enterprises, Inc.

The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers and directors. Each of the executive officers will serve until his or her successor is appointed by our Board of Directors or such executive officer’s earlier resignation or removal. Each of the directors will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or such director’s earlier resignation or removal.

Directors are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. Annual meetings of the stockholders, for the selection of directors to succeed those whose terms expire, are to be held at such time each year as designated by the Board of Directors. Officers of the Company are elected by the Board of Directors. Each officer holds his office until his successor is elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal.


Name	Age	Position

Kevin Brennan	58	Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
Larry M. Berry	64	Chief Operating Officer and President

~~Code~~Kevin ofBrennan, ~~Ethics~~Chief Executive Officer

~~The~~Mr. ~~Company~~Brennan ~~has~~was ~~not~~a ~~adopted~~founder and CEO of XRG, Inc. (XRGI.BB). He started XRG by reverse merging into a ~~code~~public shell five small private transportation companies with total annual revenues of ~~ethics~~over ~~that~~$40 ~~applies~~million. toHe ~~its~~negotiated ~~principal~~with ~~executive~~a ~~officer,~~hedge ~~principal~~fund ~~financial~~in ~~officer,~~New ~~principal~~York ~~accounting~~to ~~officer~~invest or$3.1 ~~controller,~~million orto ~~persons~~finance ~~performing~~the ~~similar~~acquisitions. ~~functions,~~When ~~because~~Mr. itBrennan ~~has~~left ~~not~~XRG ~~commenced~~the ~~any~~stock ~~material~~was ~~business~~trading ~~operations~~at a price greater than $1.

13Mr. Brennan was co-founder and Chief Financial Officer of a truckload carrier that grew to $60 million in revenue in four years, while achieving profitability from inception. He hired and directed a staff that developed the proprietary automated information systems that enabled the company to control and monitor over 100 divisions, which included both asset and non-asset based trucking companies. Mr. Brennan organized and designed the company's accounting systems so that within six months the company was able to be audited by a big eight public accounting firm. This enabled Mr. Brennan to begin negotiating with a number of major financial institutions to obtain a multimillion-dollar credit facility with the Bank of New England, as well as an equity investment with the bank's venture capital arm, New England Capital. He was responsible for negotiating the purchase and finance of over 100 tractors and trailers for the company.

~~Overview~~Mr. Brennan provided consulting services in the truckload transport industry, assisting companies in the acquisition of ~~Director~~truckload ~~Nominating~~carriers. ~~Process~~He provided expertise in negotiating and valuing the transactions, conducting the necessary due diligence, and assisting in arranging financing for the transactions. He was involved in several successfully completed transactions throughout the Eastern United States.

~~The~~Mr. ~~Board~~Brennan ofhas ~~Directors~~over ~~does~~10 ~~not~~years ~~have a standing nominating committee or committee performing similar functions. The Board~~ of ~~Directors~~public ~~also~~accounting ~~does not currently have a policy for the qualification~~experience, ~~identification,~~including ~~evaluation~~auditing ~~or consideration~~ of ~~director~~public ~~candidates.~~companies, ~~The~~and ~~Board~~is oflicensed ~~Directors~~in ~~does~~Florida ~~not~~as ~~believe that~~ a ~~defined~~CPA. ~~policy~~He ~~with~~attended ~~regard~~Ohio ~~to the qualification~~University, ~~identification,~~and ~~evaluation~~graduated orwith ~~consideration~~high ofhonors ~~candidates~~from ~~recommended~~Robert byMorris ~~stockholders~~University, isPittsburgh, ~~necessary~~PA atwith ~~this~~a ~~time~~BSBA ~~due to the lack of operations and the fact that we have not received any stockholder recommendations~~ in ~~the past~~Accounting. ~~Director nominees are considered solely by our current sole director.~~

Larry M. Berry, Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Berry was the founder and owner of Berry Consulting Group LLC (BCG). BCG specialized in the transportation industry. The company assisted clients in all facets of business development including consulting on mergers and acquisitions, developing Brokerage Platforms, and Logistic Services, and finally Agent Development. BCG had extensive experience in all of the above business development areas as well as significant operational experience.

Mr. Berry worked as the Vice President for Business Development for XRG, Worldwide Freight, PTL, CRST Logistics, and PGT Trucking. Mr. Berry was one of the original founders of Landstar and helped to develop that company into the largest non-asset based public company.

Mr. Berry attended Austin Peay University, and Western Kentucky University majoring in Business Administration.

Directors’ Term of Office

Directors hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and the election and qualification of their successors. Officers are elected annually by our board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our ~~Board~~board of ~~Directors~~directors ~~performs~~has ~~the~~not ~~duties~~created ~~that~~a ~~would~~separately-designated ~~normally~~standing ~~be performed by an~~ audit committee~~. Given~~ ~~our~~or ~~lack~~a ofcommittee ~~operations~~performing ~~prior~~similar tofunctions. ~~any merger~~Accordingly, our ~~Board~~full ofboard ~~Directors believes that its current member has sufficient knowledge and experience necessary to fulfill the duties and obligations~~ of ~~the~~directors ~~audit~~acts ~~committee~~as ~~for~~ our ~~Company. The Board of Directors has determined that the Company does not have an~~ audit committee ~~financial expert, due to lack of funds~~.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all employees including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. Our Code of Ethics is designed to deter wrongdoing and promote: (i) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; (ii) full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the SEC and in our other public communications; (iii) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; (iv) the prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and (v) accountability for adherence to the code.

Corporate Governance

We are a small reporting company, not subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act respecting any director. We have conducted special Board of Director meetings almost every month since inception. Each of our directors has attended all meetings either in person or via telephone conference. We have no standing committees regarding audit, compensation or other nominating committees. In addition to the contact information in private placement memorandum, each shareholder will be given specific information on how he/she can direct communications to the officers and directors of the corporation at our annual shareholders meetings. All communications from shareholders are relayed to the members of the Board of Directors.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, our directors and certain of our officers, and persons holding more than 10 percent of our common stock are required to file forms reporting their beneficial ownership of our common stock and subsequent changes in that ownership with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Such persons are also required to furnish Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. with copies of all forms so filed.

Based solely upon a review of copies of such forms filed on Forms 3, 4, and 5, and amendments thereto furnished to us, we believe that as of the date of this report, our executive officers, directors and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners complied on a timely basis with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~Executive~~Summary Compensation Table

~~Steven~~The ~~White~~following ~~has~~summary ~~served~~compensation astable reflects total compensation for our chief executive officer/chief ~~since~~financial ~~April~~officer, ~~2008. From~~and ~~January~~our totwo ~~April~~most ~~2008~~highly ~~Carey~~compensated ~~Birmingham~~executive ~~served~~officers as(each ~~our~~a ~~chief~~“named executive officer~~. Neither~~”) ~~Mr.~~whose ~~White~~compensation orexceeded ~~Mr. Birmingham~~$100,000 ~~nor any other person received compensation from us~~ during the ~~years~~fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009 orand ~~2007, which would be reportable pursuant to this item~~2008.

Equity Awards


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Option Awards ($)		All other compensation ($)		Total ($)
Kevin Brennan, Chief Executive	2009		23,883		-		-		-		23,883
Officer and Chief Financial Officer	2008		-		-		-		-		-
Larry M. Berry,	2009		177,200		-		-		-		177,200
Chief Operating Officer	2008		-		-		-		-		-

~~Neither~~Narrative ~~Mr.~~Disclosure ~~White~~of ~~nor~~Executive ~~Mr.~~Compensation ~~Birmingham held any unexercised options, stock that had not vested, or equity incentive plan awards at December 31, 2008.~~

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

None.

Director Compensation

~~No compensation was paid to or earned by any director during the year ended December 31, 2008~~None.

~~Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation~~18

NoEmployment ~~compensation~~Agreements was paid to or earned by any executive officer during the year ended December 31, 2008, and we have had no compensation committee. During the year ended December 31, 2008, no officer participated, and the Board of Directors did not engage, in deliberations concerning executive officer compensation. Also during the year ended December 31, 2008, no executive officer or director of our Company served as an executive officer or director of another entity, one of whose executive officers or directors served on the board of directors of our Company.

None

Stock Incentive Plan

On July 31, 2009, we adopted the Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). Awards may be made under the Plan for up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock in the form of stock options or restricted stock awards. Awards may be made to our employees, officers or directors as well as our consultants or advisors. The Plan is administered by our Board of Directors which has full and final authority to interpret the Plan, select the persons to whom awards may be granted, and determine the amount, vesting and all other terms of any awards. To the extent permitted by applicable law, our Board may delegate any or all of its powers under the Plan to one or more committees or subcommittees of the Board. The Plan is not subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and is not a "qualified plan" under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Plan has not been approved by our shareholders. As a result, "incentive stock options" as defined under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code may not be granted under the Plan until our shareholders approve the Plan.

All stock options granted under the Plan are exercisable for a period of up to ten years from the date of grant, are subject to vesting as determined by the Board upon grant, and have an exercise price equal to not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, awards may not be transferred except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. The Board has discretion to determine the effect on any award granted under the Plan of the death, disability, retirement, resignation, termination or other change in employment or other status of any participant in the Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock for which awards may be granted to a participant under the Plan in any calendar year is 2,500,000.

The Plan states that a "Change of Control" occurs when (i) any "person" (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) acquires "beneficial ownership" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power of the then outstanding securities of the Company except where the acquisition is approved by the Board; or (ii) if the Company is to be consolidated with or acquired by another entity in a merger or other reorganization in which the holders of the outstanding voting stock of the Company immediately preceding the consummation of such event, shall, immediately following such event, hold, as a group, less than a majority of the voting securities of the surviving or successor entity or in the event of a sale of all or substantially all of the Company's assets or otherwise.

Unless otherwise provided in option or employment agreements, if the Plan is terminated as a result of or following a “Change of Control”, all vested awards may be exercised for 30 day’s from the date of notice of the termination. All participants will be credited with an additional six months of service for the purpose of unvested awards. If the Plan is assumed or not terminated upon the occurrence of a “Change of Control”, all participants will be credited with an additional six months of service if, during the remaining term of such participant’s awards, any participant is terminated without cause.

To date we have issued two million four hundred and fifty thousand (2,450,000) shares.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

~~Beneficial~~The ~~Owners~~following table indicates how many shares of ~~More~~our common stock were beneficially owned as of December 31, 2009, by (1) each person known by us to be the owner of more than ~~Five~~5% ~~Percent~~of our outstanding shares of common stock, ~~Directors~~(2) our directors, (3) our executive officers, and (4) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each person named below has sole voting and investment power with respect to all common stock beneficially owned by that person or entity, subject to the matters set forth in the footnotes to the table below. Unless otherwise provided, the address of each of the persons listed below is c/o Optimized Transportation Management, Inc., 707 Grant Street, Suite #2307, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219.

The following table sets forth certain information from reports filed by the named parties, or furnished by current management, concerning the ownership of our Common Stock as of March 15, 2009, of (i) each person who is known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of our Common Stock; (ii) all directors and executive officers; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group:


Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount (1)	Percent of Class

Kevin Brennan *	0		0.0	%
Larry M Berry *	2,000,000		15.0	%
All officers and directors as a group (2 persons)	2,000,000		15.0	%

[optimized10k123109006.gif]

14(*) Less than one percent

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)	Percentage of Class(2)
Steven White 386 North 210 East Mapleton, UT 84664	20,000,000	36.1%
Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (1 Person)	20,000,000	36.1%
1st Orion Corp. P.O. Box 338 West Jordan, UT 84084	24,000,000(3)	43.3%
Carey Birmingham 20022 Creek Farm San Antonio, TX 78259	16,478,800(4)	29.7%

(1) This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Beneficial ownership also includes shares of stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table. As of the date of this table, there are no outstanding options or warrants.

(2) Applicable percentages are based on 55,485,660 shares of our Common Stock outstanding on March 15, 2009.

(3) Includes 8,000,000 shares over which Mr. Birmingham has sole voting power.

(4) Includes 8,000,000 shares owned by 1st Orion Corp. over which Mr. Birmingham retains sole voting power.

Change of Control

We anticipate that a change of control will occur when a new business venture is acquired. Our business plan is to seek and, if possible, acquire an operating entity through a reverse acquisition transaction with the operating entity. By its nature, a reverse acquisition generally entails a change in management and principal shareholders of the surviving entity. While management cannot predict the specific nature of the form of the reverse acquisition, it is anticipated that at the closing of the process, the current sole officer and director would resign in favor of persons designated by the operating company and that the shareholders of the operating entity would receive a controlling number of shares in our company, thus effecting a change in control of the company.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

AsThe offollowing ~~December~~table ~~31,~~sets ~~2008,~~forth ~~the~~certain ~~Company~~information ~~had~~regarding ~~not adopted any~~ compensation plans ~~(including individual compensation arrangements)~~ under which our equity securities ofare ~~the Company were~~ authorized for issuance as of June 30, 2009.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants and rights (a)		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity Compensation Plans approved by security holders		0		--		0
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		3,370,000	$	0.520		1,630,000
Total		3,370,000	$	0.520		1,630,000

~~Certain~~A ~~Relationships~~description ~~and~~of ~~Related~~the ~~Transactions~~material terms of The Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is set forth in Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION- Stock Incentive Plan.

~~In April 2008~~Review, ~~Carey~~Approval G.or ~~Birmingham,~~Ratification ~~our~~of ~~former~~Transactions ~~sole officer and Director, entered into an agreement~~ with ~~Steven~~Related L.Persons White (the “April 2008 Agreement”), whereby the Company sold 20,000,000 shares of common stock to Mr. White for $20,000 and other consideration. As of the closing of the April 2008 Agreement, on April 22, 2008, Mr. White beneficially owned 91.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, at that time.

15Our board is responsible for reviewing and approving all related party transactions. Before approving such a transaction, the board takes into account all relevant factors that it deems appropriate, including whether the related party transaction is on terms no less favorable to us than terms generally available from an unaffiliated third party. Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, principal stockholder or any of such persons' immediate family members or affiliates in which the amount involved is deemed material must first be presented to our board for review, consideration and approval. All of our directors, executive officers and employees are required to report to our board any such related party transaction. In approving or rejecting the proposed agreement, our board considers the facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the board, including, but not limited to the risks, costs and benefits to us, the terms of the transaction, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products and, if applicable, the impact on a director's independence. Our board approves only those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as our board determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion. Although the policies and procedures described above are not written, the board applies the foregoing criteria in evaluating and approving all such transactions. Each of the transactions described below were approved by our board of directors in accordance with the foregoing.

~~Carey~~Director ~~Birmingham~~Independence resigned as an officer and director of URM effective immediately upon acceptance of the appointment of Steven L. White as a director following the closing of the April 2008 Agreement. In addition, Mr. Birmingham forgave all debts owed to him including the Line of Credit totaling $84,403 and $11,159 of interest. He also cancelled the remaining 600,000 warrants he held to purchase shares of the Company’s stock and agreed to release the Company from any and all claims he may have against the Company. As a result of this transaction the line of credit for up to $95,000 previously furnished by Mr. Birmingham was cancelled.

~~Director~~As ~~Independence~~of the date of the report, we do not maintain a separately designated audit, compensation or nominating committee.

~~Our~~ITEM ~~securities are not listed on a national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that directors be independent~~14. As aPRINCIPAL ~~result,~~ACCOUNTANTS weFEE ~~have~~AND adopted the independence standards of the American Stock Exchange to determine the independence of our directors and those directors serving on our committees. These standards provide that a person will be considered an independent director if he or she is not an officer of the Company and is, in the view of the Company’s Board of Directors, free of any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment. Our Board of Directors has determined that our sole director is not independent. We have no audit committee.SERVICES

~~ITEM~~The 14following represents fees for professional audit services performed by for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and fees billed and unbilled for other services rendered by it during those periods: $0. ~~PRINCIPAL~~We ~~ACCOUNTANT~~have ~~FEES~~completed ~~AND~~our ~~SERVICES~~initial audit for the two year period ended December 31, 2009. Progress billings and final invoicing are expected to be $25,000 per year for each year. .

Audit Fees ~~Paid~~

~~Malone~~Audit ~~Bailey served~~Fees asconsist ~~our~~of ~~independent~~fees ~~registered~~billed ~~public~~and ~~accounting~~unbilled ~~firm~~for professional services rendered for the ~~fiscal~~audit ~~years~~of ~~ended~~our ~~December~~consolidated ~~31,~~financial ~~2008~~statements and ~~2007. The~~review ~~following~~of ~~fees~~the ~~were~~interim ~~paid~~financial tostatements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by our independent registered public ~~accounting~~accountants ~~firm~~in ~~for~~connection ~~services~~with ~~rendered~~statutory ~~during~~and ~~our~~regulatory ~~last~~filings ~~two~~or ~~fiscal~~engagements. ~~years:~~

~~Audit Fees~~20

~~The~~Audit ~~aggregate~~Related ~~fees~~Fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in the quarterly reports and other fees that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $14,000 and $7,210, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company's consolidated financial statements and are not reported under "Audit Fees."

~~There~~Tax ~~were~~Fees no fees billed for assurance and related services by our principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements, other than those previously reported above, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Tax Fees consists of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal and state tax compliance, tax audit defense, customs and duties, and mergers and acquisitions.

~~There~~All ~~were~~Other noFees ~~fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.~~

All Other Fees consist of fees billed for products and services provided not described above.

~~There~~Audit ~~were~~Committee noPre-Approval ~~other~~Policies ~~fees billed for products or services provided by the principal accountant, other than those previously reported above, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008~~ and ~~2007.~~Procedures

~~Audit~~Our ~~Committee~~Board of Directors serves as our audit committee. Our Board of Directors approves the engagement of our independent auditors, and meets with our independent auditors to approve the annual scope of accounting services to be performed and the related fee estimates. It also meets with our independent auditors, on a quarterly basis, following completion of their quarterly reviews and annual audit and prior to our earnings announcements, if any, to review the results of their work. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, all audit and non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accountants were pre-approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with the foregoing procedures.

~~Our~~ITEM ~~auditor has not provided any non-audit services in the past and does not anticipate providing any non-audit services to the Company~~15. In ~~the~~EXHIBITS ~~event~~AND ~~non-audit~~FINANCIAL ~~services~~STATEMENT are contemplated in the future, our Board of Directors, which functions in the capacity of an audit committee, will consider whether the non-audit services provided by our auditors to us would be compatible with maintaining the independence of our auditors and whether the independence of our auditors would be compromised by the provision of such services. Our Board of Directors pre-approves all auditing services and would approve any permitted non-audit services contemplated in the future, including the fees and terms of those services, to be performed for us by our independent auditor prior to engagement.SCHEDULES


Exhibit No.		Description

21.1		Subsidiaries of the Registrant

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

~~PART IV~~21

~~ITEM~~SIGNATURES ~~15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES~~

~~Financial~~Pursuant ~~Statements~~to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

The following financial statements are filed with this report:


		OPTIMIZED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, INC.


Date: March 31, 2010	By:	/s/ Kevin P. Brennan
		Kevin P. Brennan
		Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

~~Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~ 22

~~Balance~~FINANCIAL ~~Sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007~~ STATEMENTS

~~Statements~~INDEX ofTO ~~Operations~~THE ~~for~~CONSOLIDATED ~~the~~FINANCIAL ~~years~~STATEMENTS ~~ended December 31, 2008 and 2007~~

~~Statement~~OPTIMIZED ofTRANSPORTATION ~~Stockholders’ Equity from December 31~~MANAGEMENT, ~~2006,~~INC. ~~through December 31, 2008~~

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008	F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008	F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008	F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7

~~Notes to Financial Statements~~ F-1

~~Exhibits~~Randall N. Drake, C.P.A., P.A.

~~The~~1981 ~~following~~Promenade ~~exhibits are included with this report:~~Way

		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description	Form	File No.	Exhibit	Filing Date	Filed Here-with
2.1	Agreement dated April 4, 2008	10-Q	333-88179	10.9	5/15/08
3.1	Articles of Incorporation					X
3.2	Bylaws	SB-1	333-88179	2.2	9/30/99
10.1	Master Revolving Credit Note with Carey Birmingham	10-KSB	333-88179	10.8	3/26/08
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer					X
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer					X

Clearwater, FL 33760

~~Signature Page Follows~~727.536.4863

17Randall@RDrakeCPA.com

~~SIGNATURES~~Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

~~Pursuant~~Board ~~to the requirements~~ of ~~Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.~~Directors

~~UNITED~~Optimized ~~RESTAURANT~~Transportation ~~MANAGEMENT~~Management, ~~INC~~Inc.

~~Date: March~~Pittsburg ~~20, 2009~~Pennsylvania

~~By:~~We /have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s/ ~~Steven~~management. LOur responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. ~~White~~

~~Steven~~We ~~White~~conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required at this time, ~~President~~to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provided a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~Pursuant~~In our opinion, based on our audit, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the ~~requirements~~financial position of the ~~Securities~~Company ~~Exchange~~as ~~Act~~ of ~~1934~~December 31, ~~this~~2009 ~~report~~and ~~has~~2008 ~~been~~and ~~signed~~the ~~below~~results byof ~~the~~its ~~following~~operations ~~persons~~and onits ~~behalf~~cash offlows for the ~~registrant~~years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 in ~~the~~conformity ~~capacities~~with ~~and~~accounting onprinciples generally accepted in the ~~date~~United ~~indicated.~~States of America

~~Date: March~~/s/ 20Randall N. Drake, ~~2009~~CPA PA

~~By:~~Clearwater, ~~/s/ Steven L. White~~ Florida

~~Steven~~March ~~White~~31, ~~Director and President (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)~~2010

18F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


OPTIMIZED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008

			2009		2008
Assets
	Current assets -
		Cash	$	60,059	$	27
		Accounts receivable		75,463		1,522,556
		Prepaid expenses		10,686		19,211
		Due from WLSV		-		409,973
		Total current assets		146,208		1,951,767

	Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $3,069			232,334		59,950
		Total Assets	$	378,542	$	2,011,717

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
	Current liabilities -
		Overdraft	$	-	$	10,101
		Accounts payable		28,960		231,834
		Accrued expenses		21,400		1,456,537
		Line of credit		251,584		187,555
		Note payables		15,772		6,906
		Due to shareholder		-		40,000
		Total current liabilities		317,716		1,932,933

	Stockholders' Equity -
		Preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized:
		Convertible preferred stock, Series A $0.001 par value, 1,050,000
		shares issued and outstanding		1,050		-
		Preferred stock, Series B $0.001 par value, 1,500,000 shares
		issued and outstanding		1,500		-
		Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
		issued and outstanding: 12,384,000 at December 31, 2009		12,384		200
		Additional paid-in capital		(66,982)		-
		Retained earnings		112,874		78,584
		Total stockholders’ equity		60,826		78,784
		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	378,542	$	2,011,717

*The auditor's report and the accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.*

~~To the Board of Directors~~F-3

United Restaurant Management, Inc.


OPTIMIZED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008


		2009		2008

Revenue		$	6,813,565	$	3,677,717
Costs and expenses:
	Cost of transportation		5,850,553		3,169,092
	Selling, general and administrative expenses		837,915		482,217
	Total costs and expenses		6,688,468		3,651,309

	Income from operations		125,097		26,408

Other income (expense):
	Interest expense		(69,398)		(26,586)
	Total other income (expense)		(69,398)		(26,586)

	Income before income tax (expense) benefit		55,699		(179)

Net income tax (expense) benefit			(21,400)		-

	Net income (loss)	$	34,299	$	(179)


Net income per common share – basic		$	.00	$	.00
Net income per common share – diluted		$	.00		.00

Weighted average shares outstanding:
	Basic shares		9,326,000		8,000,000
	Diluted shares		18,270,444		8,000,000

*The auditor's report and the accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.*

~~Springville, UT~~F-4

WeOPTIMIZED ~~have~~TRANSPORTATION ~~audited the accompanying balance sheets of United Restaurant Management~~MANAGEMENT, ~~Inc~~INC. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related statements of expenses, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the two years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of United Restaurant Management, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

WeConsolidated ~~conducted~~Statement ~~our audits in accordance with the standards~~ of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the CompanyStockholders’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.Equity

InFor ~~our opinion,~~ the ~~financial~~years ~~statements~~ended ~~referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of United Restaurant Management, Inc. as of~~ December 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007 and the statements of expenses and cash flows for the two years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.~~2008

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that United Restaurant Management, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, United Restaurant Management, Inc. suffered losses from operations and has a working capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


								Additional				Total
	Common Stock			Preferred Stock				Paid in		Retained		Stockholders
	SHARES		AMOUNT	SHARES		AMOUNT		Capital		Earnings		Equity

Balance at December 31, 2007	200	$	200	-	$	-	$	-	$	78,763	$	78,963

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008	-		-	-		-		-		(179)		(179)

Balance at December 31, 2008	200		200	-		-		-		78,584		78,784

Shares issued for acquisition of Federal Logistics, Inc. and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc.	5,500,000		5,500	1,200,000		1,200		-		-		6,700

Recapitalization	2,499,800		2,300	-		-		(8,998)		-		(6,698)

Shares issued for services	9,784,000		9,784	1,350,000		1,350		768,139		-		779,273

Repayment of debt	(5,500,000)		(5,500)	-		-		(826,123)		-		(831,623)

Shares issued for investment	100,000		100	-		-		-		-		100

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2009	-		-	-		-		-		34,299		34,299

Balance at December 31, 2009	12,384,000	$	12,384	2,550,000	$	2,550	$	(66,982)	$	112,874	$	60,826

*The auditor's report and the accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.*

~~/s/Malone & Bailey, P.C.~~F-5

www.malone−bailey.com


OPTIMIZED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

			2009		2008
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net income		$	34,299	$	(179)

ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME TO NET CASH
	PROVIDED BY (USED BY) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
		depreciation		3,069		-
	CHANGE IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -
		accounts receivable		1,447,093		(1,481,148)
		other current assets and deposits		8,525		(19,211)
		accounts payable		(202,874)		225,527
		other accrued costs		(1,435,138)		1,459,418
	Net cash (used by) provided by operating activities			(145,026)		184,407

CASH FLOWS USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
		capital expenditures and software development costs		(175,453)		(59,950)
	Net cash used for investing activities			(175,453)		(59,950)

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
		bank overdraft		(10,101)		10,101
		proceeds from notes		28,500		40,000
		payments on notes payable		(59,634)		6,906
		net proceeds from line of credit		64,029		187,555
		net from stockholder		409,964		(562,365)
		proceeds from issuance of common stock		(52,248)		-
	Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities			380,510		(317,803)

	NET INCREASE IN CASH			60,032		(193,346)

	CASH, BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD			27		193,373

	CASH, END OF PERIOD		$	60,059	$	27

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
		Interest paid	$	69,398	$	26,586
		Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-

*The auditor's report and the accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.*

~~Houston, TX~~F-6

~~March~~OPTIMIZED 20TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, ~~2009~~INC.

~~F-1~~Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

~~UNITED~~For ~~RESTAURANT~~the ~~MANAGEMENT,~~Years ~~INC~~Ended December 31. 2009 and 2008

~~BALANCE~~NOTE ~~SHEETS~~1 – THE COMPANY AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

		December 31,		December 31,
		2008		2007
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	708	$	-
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
Accrued expenses	$	13,051	$	12,362
Line of credit from officer		5,122		76,492
Total Current Liabilities		18,173		88,855
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par,
10,000,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding		-		-
Common stock, $0.001 par,
100,000,000 shares authorized,55,485,660 and
35,485,660 shares issued and outstanding		55,486		35,486
Additional paid-in capital		2,087,576		1,992,014
Accumulated deficit		(2,160,527)		(2,116,355)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(17,465)		(88,855)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$	708	$	-

The Company

~~See~~Optimized ~~accompanying~~Transportation ~~summary~~Management, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania based supply chain logistics company formed subsequent to the acquisition of ~~accounting~~its ~~policies~~two operating subsidiaries, Federal Logistics, Inc. (FL), and ~~notes~~Optimized ~~to financial~~Transportation ~~statements~~Software, Inc. (OTSI). FL, a non asset based transportation company, was incorporated in the state of Florida on February 29, 2008. OTSI, engaged in the implementation of supply chain software, was incorporated in the state of Florida on June 25, 2007.

FAs reported on a Form 8-2K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 19, 2009, on June 19, 2009 United Restaurant Management, Inc. (the “Registrant”), a Delaware corporation, entered into an Agreement (the “Agreement”) with World Logistics Services. Inc. (“World Logistics”), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, World Logistics agreed to transfer all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock in Federal Logistics, Inc. and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. to the Registrant in exchange for the issuance of an aggregate of 5,500,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock and 700,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and 500,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”) to Kevin P. Brennan, thereby causing Federal Logistics, Inc. (FL) and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. (OTSI) to become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant (the “Share Exchange”).

~~UNITED~~NOTE ~~RESTAURANT~~2 ~~MANAGEMENT,~~- ~~INC.~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~STATEMENTS~~Basis OFof ~~EXPENSES~~Presentation

~~Years~~The ~~Ended~~consolidated ~~December~~financial 31statements include the accounts of Optimized Transportation Management, ~~2008~~Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and ~~2007~~transactions have been eliminated.

		2008		2007
General & administrative	$	42,573	$	30,550
Interest expense		1,599		7,081
Net loss	$	(44,172)	$	(37,631)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		49,911,830		35,485,660

Use of Estimates

~~See~~The ~~accompanying~~Company ~~summary~~prepares ofits financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting ~~policies~~principles ~~and~~in ~~notes~~the United States of America. These principals require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable and have been discussed with the Board of Directors; however, actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~F-3~~Variable Interest Entities

~~UNITED~~The ~~RESTAURANT~~Company ~~MANAGEMENT~~considers the consolidation of entities to which the usual condition (ownership of a majority voting interest) of consolidation does not apply, ~~INC~~focusing on controlling financial interests that may be achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interest. If an enterprise holds a majority of the variable interests of an entity, it would be considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is generally required to consolidate assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests at fair value (or at historical cost if the entity is a related party) and subsequently account for the variable interest as if it were consolidated based on a majority voting interest.

~~STATEMENTS~~Financial ~~OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT~~Instruments

~~Years~~The ~~Ended~~Company’s ~~December~~balance 31sheets include the following financial instruments: cash, ~~2008~~accounts receivable, accounts payable and ~~2007~~note payable to stockholder. The carrying amounts of current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization. The carrying values of the note payable to stockholder approximates fair value based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities.

					Additional
			Common Stock		Paid-in		Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit		Totals
Balances, Dec. 31, 2006	35,485,660	$	35,486	$	1,992,014	$	(2,078,724)	$	(51,224)
Net loss	-		-		-		(37,631)		(37,631)
Balances, Dec. 31, 2007	35,485,660		35,486		1,992,014		(2,116,355)		(88,855)
Capital Contribution	-		-		95,562		-		95,562
Common Stock issued
for Cash	20,000,00		20,000		-		-		20,000
Net loss	-		-				(44,172)		(44,172)
Balances, Dec. 31, 2008	55,485,660	$	55,486	$	2,087,576	$	(2,160,527)	$	(17,465)

Fair Value Measurements

~~See~~The ~~accompanying~~Company ~~summary~~implemented ofthe ~~accounting~~provisions, ~~policies~~for its financial assets and ~~notes~~liabilities which are required to be re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period and non-financial ~~statements~~assets and liabilities which are re-measured and reported at fair value at least annually.

F-47

~~UNITED~~In ~~RESTAURANT~~general, ~~MANAGEMENT~~fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, ~~INC~~such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

~~STATEMENTS~~Cash OFand ~~CASH~~Cash ~~FLOWS~~Equivalents

~~Years~~The ~~Ended~~majority ~~December~~of 31cash is maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, ~~2008~~these deposits may be redeemed on demand and, ~~2007~~therefore, bear minimal risk. The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of six months or less to be cash equivalents.

		2008		2007
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(44,172)	$	(37,631)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to cash used in operating activities:
Changes in accrued expenses		19,758		3,238
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(24,414)		(34,393)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase in line of credit from officer		5,122		34,393
Issuance of Common Stock for cash		20,000		-
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		25,122		34,393
NET CHANGE IN CASH		708		-
CASH AT BEGINNING OF THE YEAR		-		-
CASH AT END OF THE YEAR	$	708	$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Interest paid	$	-	$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-
Non-cash transaction
Write-off of related party debt
as contributed capital	$	95,562	$	-

Accounts Receivable

~~See~~The ~~accompanying~~Company’s ~~summary~~receivables ofare ~~accounting~~recorded ~~policies~~when billed and ~~notes~~represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash. The carrying value of the Company’s receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, represents their estimated net realizable value. The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable on a customer-by-customer basis. The Company records a reserve for bad debts against amounts due to ~~financial~~ ~~statements~~reduce the net recognized receivable to an amount the Company believes will be reasonably collected. The reserve is a discretionary amount determined from the analysis of the aging of the accounts receivables, historical experience and knowledge of specific customers. Based on management’s evaluation no reserve is required as of December 31, 2009 or 2008.

~~F-5~~Furniture & Equipment

~~UNITED~~Furniture ~~RESTAURANT~~and ~~MANAGEMENT~~equipment are stated at cost, ~~INC~~less accumulated depreciation over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Depreciation is computed using five to seven year lives for furniture and equipment on a straight line method. Computer software is depreciated over a three year life using the straight line method of depreciation. Upon retirement or other disposition of these assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is reflected in other income or expense. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and renewals of minor items are charged to expense as incurred. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized.

~~NOTES~~Certain TOsoftware ~~FINANCIAL~~development ~~STATEMENTS~~costs incurred subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility may be capitalized and amortized over the estimated lives of the related products. The Company determines technological feasibility to be established upon the internal release of a working model. Upon the general release of the product to customers, development costs for that product are amortized over periods not exceeding three years, based on the estimated economic life of the product.

~~NOTE~~Costs 1for -general ~~SUMMARY~~and OFadministrative, ~~SIGNIFICANT~~overhead, ~~ACCOUNTING~~maintenance ~~POLICIES~~and training, as well as the cost of software that does not add functionality to existing systems, are expensed as incurred.

~~Nature of~~ Business. ~~International~~Acquisitions Test Systems, Inc. (ITS) was originally formed in Texas on September 20, 1996 to manufacture, market, sell and distribute a family of hardware and software products used to test and troubleshoot components on printed circuit boards. This Texas corporation was dissolved in Texas in September 1999 and separately incorporated in Delaware with substantially identical ownership on September 20, 1999.

~~Basis~~Acquisitions of ~~Presentation. In~~business ~~September~~are ~~2007,~~accounted ~~ITS~~for ~~changed~~utilizing ~~its~~the ~~name~~purchase tomethod ~~United~~and, ~~Restaurant Management~~accordingly, ~~Inc.~~the ~~(URM)~~results ~~and~~of ~~affected~~operations aof ~~1:25~~acquired ~~reverse~~properties ~~stock~~are ~~split~~included ofin our ~~issued~~results ~~and~~of ~~outstanding~~operations ~~common~~from ~~stock. In~~the ~~April~~respective ~~2008~~dates ~~the~~of ~~Company~~acquisition. ~~affected~~Estimates aof ~~1:20~~future ~~forward~~cash ~~stock~~flows ~~split~~and ofother ~~our~~valuation ~~issued~~techniques ~~and~~are ~~outstanding~~used ~~common~~to ~~stock.~~allocate ~~The~~the ~~affects~~purchase price of ~~the~~acquired ~~Reverse~~property between land, buildings and ~~Forward~~improvements, ~~Splits~~equipment, ~~were~~debt ~~retroactively~~liabilities ~~affected~~assumed ~~throughout~~and ~~the~~identifiable ~~financial~~intangible ~~statements~~assets and liabilities.

~~Use~~Goodwill of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as certain financial statement disclosures. While management believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are appropriate, actual results could differ from these estimates.

~~Cash~~The ~~Equivalents.~~Company ~~Highly~~performs ~~liquid~~an ~~investments~~annual impairment test for goodwill and intangible assets with ~~original~~indefinite ~~maturities~~lives. The first step of ~~three~~the ~~months~~impairment test requires the Company to determine the fair value of each reporting unit, and compare the fair value to the reporting unit's carrying amount. To the extent a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an indication exists that the reporting unit's goodwill may be impaired and the Company must perform a second more detailed impairment assessment. The second impairment assessment involves allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its recognized and unrecognized assets and liabilities in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill as of the assessment date. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill to quantify an impairment charge as of the assessment date. The Company typically performs its annual impairment test effective at midyear of each year, unless events or ~~less~~circumstances ~~are~~indicate, ~~considered~~an ~~cash~~impairment ~~equivalents~~may have occurred before that time. As of December 31, 2009 no goodwill impairment has been recognized.

~~Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when the earning process is complete and the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the customer.~~F-8

~~Income~~Long-Lived ~~taxes.~~Assets URM recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. URM provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.

~~Stock-Based~~The ~~Compensation.~~Company ~~Effective~~reviews ~~January~~long-lived 1,assets ~~2006,~~to ~~URM~~be ~~began~~held-and-used ~~recording~~for ~~compensation~~impairment ~~expense~~whenever ~~associated~~events ~~with~~or ~~stock~~changes ~~options,~~in ~~warrants~~circumstances ~~and~~indicate ~~other~~the ~~forms~~carrying amount of ~~equity~~the ~~compensation~~assets inmay ~~accordance~~not ~~with~~be ~~Statement~~recoverable. If the sum of ~~Financial~~the ~~Accounting~~undiscounted ~~Standards~~expected ~~No.~~future ~~123R,~~cash ~~Share~~flows over the remaining useful life of a long-~~Based~~lived ~~Payment,~~asset asis ~~interpreted~~less bythan ~~SEC~~its ~~Staff~~carrying ~~Accounting~~amount, ~~Bulletin~~the ~~No.~~asset ~~107.~~is ~~Prior~~considered to ~~January~~be 1,impaired. ~~2006,~~Impairment ~~URM~~losses ~~had~~are ~~accounted~~measured ~~for~~as ~~stock~~the ~~options~~amount ~~according~~by towhich the ~~provisions~~carrying amount of ~~Accounting~~the ~~Principles~~asset ~~Board~~exceeds ~~Opinion~~the Nofair value of the asset. 25When fair values are not available, ~~Accounting~~the ~~for~~Company ~~Stock~~estimates ~~Issued~~fair tovalue ~~Employees,~~using ~~and~~the ~~related~~expected ~~interpretations,~~future ~~and~~cash ~~therefore~~flows nodiscounted ~~related~~at ~~compensation~~a ~~expense~~rate ~~was~~commensurate ~~recorded~~with ~~for~~the ~~awards~~risks ~~granted~~associated with nothe ~~intrinsic~~recovery ~~value~~of the asset. ~~URM~~Assets ~~adopted~~to be disposed of are reported at the ~~modified~~lower ~~prospective~~of ~~transition~~carrying ~~method~~amount ~~provided~~or ~~for~~fair ~~under~~value ~~SFAS~~less Nocosts to sell. ~~123R,~~Management has performed a review of all long-lived assets and, ~~consequently,~~has ~~have~~determined ~~not~~no ~~retroactively~~impairment ~~adjusted~~of ~~results~~the ~~from~~respective ~~prior~~carrying ~~periods~~value has occurred as of December 31, 2009.

~~Basic~~Commitments and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share equals net earnings divided by weighted average shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share include the impact of common stock equivalents using the treasury stock method when the effect is dilutive. Basic and diluted are the same for 2008 and 2007 due to antidilutive effects of common stock equivalents.

~~Recently~~The ~~issued~~Company ~~accounting~~has ~~pronouncements.~~operating ~~URM~~lease ~~does~~commitments, ~~not~~some ~~expect the adoption~~ of ~~any~~which ~~recently~~are ~~issued~~for ~~accounting~~office ~~pronouncements~~space toand ~~have~~are aunder ~~significant~~non-cancelable ~~impact~~operating onleases ~~URM’s~~expiring ~~results~~at ofvarious ~~operations,~~dates ~~financial~~through ~~position~~November ~~or cash flows~~2013.

~~F-6~~Income Taxes

~~NOTE~~Deferred 2income –tax ~~GOING~~assets ~~CONCERN~~and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the book values and the tax bases of particular assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to offset the net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

AsThe ~~shown~~Company inaccounts ~~the~~for ~~accompanying~~uncertain ~~financial~~income ~~statements,~~tax ~~URM~~positions ~~has~~and, ~~incurred~~accordingly, ~~recurring~~reports ~~net~~a ~~losses. These~~liability ~~conditions~~for ~~create~~unrecognized antax ~~uncertainty~~benefits asresulting tofrom ~~URM’s~~uncertain ~~ability~~income totax ~~continue~~positions astaken aor ~~going~~expected ~~concern. Management is attempting~~ to ~~raise~~be ~~additional~~taken ~~capital~~in ~~through~~an ~~sales~~income oftax ~~URM common stock as well as seeking financing from third parties~~return. ~~The~~ ~~financial~~Estimated ~~statements~~interest doand ~~not~~penalties ~~include~~are ~~any~~recorded ~~adjustments~~as ~~that~~a ~~might~~component beof ~~necessary~~interest ifexpense ~~URM~~or isother ~~unable~~expense, ~~to continue as a going concern~~respectively.

~~NOTE~~Revenue 3Recognition –and ~~LINE~~Purchased OFTransportation ~~CREDIT~~Costs

InOur ~~April~~principal ~~2006,~~source ~~our~~of ~~former~~income ~~Chief~~is ~~Executive~~derived ~~Officer~~from ~~provided~~our usagents ~~with~~providing afreight ~~line~~dispatch ofservices ~~credit~~to ~~for~~our ~~$50,000,~~customers. ~~which~~Our ~~carried~~agents ~~interest~~negotiate atwith 8%our ~~per~~customers ~~annum. In~~a ~~2007,~~cost for the ~~line~~movement ~~was~~of ~~increased~~their tofreight. ~~$95,000~~Our ~~and~~agents ~~extended~~then toarrange ~~December~~the ~~31,~~assignment ~~2008. As~~ of ~~March~~our ~~31,~~customer’s ~~2008,~~freight ~~$84,403~~to ~~had~~a ~~been~~trucking ~~loaned~~company ~~under~~and ~~the~~we ~~line~~assume ofthe ~~credit~~payment ~~and $11,159~~ of ~~interest~~that ~~had~~negotiated ~~been accrued~~cost. On ~~April~~Our 4,revenue ~~2008,~~represents inthe ~~conjunction~~total ~~with~~dollar anvalue ~~agreement~~of ~~entered~~services ~~into~~we bycharge ~~URM,~~to ~~its~~our ~~former~~customers. ~~Chief~~Our ~~Executive~~transportation ~~Officer~~cost ~~and~~is ~~its current President,~~ the ~~loan~~direct ~~balance~~cost ~~and~~of ~~accrued~~transportation ~~interest,~~charged ~~totaling~~by ~~$95,562, were contributed to capital and~~ the ~~line~~motor ~~of credit was cancelled~~carrier.

~~NOTE~~The 4Company –recognizes ~~RELATED~~revenue ~~PARTY~~on ~~TRANSACTION~~a gross basis, as a result of the following: The Company is the primary obligor responsible for providing the service desired by the customer and is responsible for fulfillment, including the acceptability of the service(s) ordered or purchased by the customer. At the Company’s sole discretion, it sets the prices charged to its customers, and is not required to obtain approval or consent from any other party in establishing its prices. The Company has multiple suppliers for the services it sells to its customers, and has the absolute and complete discretion and right to select the supplier that will provide the product(s) or service(s) ordered by a customer, including changing the supplier on a shipment-by-shipment basis. In most cases, the Company determines the nature, type, characteristics, and specifications of the service(s) ordered by the customer. The Company also assumes credit risk for the amount billed to the customer.

InAs ~~September~~a ~~2008,~~non-asset ~~Lorikeet~~based carrier, ~~Inc~~the Company does not own transportation assets. ~~which~~The isCompany ~~100%~~generates ~~owned~~the major portion of its freight revenues by ~~Steven~~purchasing Ltransportation services from direct (asset-based) carriers and reselling those services to its customers. ~~White,~~We ~~our~~recognize ~~sole~~revenue ~~officer~~on a transportation shipment when delivered and ~~Director,~~record ~~advanced~~estimated ~~the~~costs ~~company~~related ~~$5,000~~to atthat 8%shipment ~~interest~~based ~~per~~on ~~annum~~the ~~due~~paperwork ~~September~~received 9,by ~~2009~~us at delivery.

InOur ~~April~~software ~~2008,~~as ~~Carey~~a G.service ~~Birmingham,~~is ~~our~~offered ~~former~~as ~~sole~~a ~~officer~~subscription ~~and~~service ~~Director,~~on ~~entered~~a ~~into~~month ~~an agreement with Steven L. White (the “April 2008 Agreement”), whereby URM sold 20,000,000 shares of common stock~~ to ~~Mr.~~month ~~White for $20,000 and other consideration~~billing. As ~~a result of the closing~~Accordingly, ~~control~~there ofare ~~the~~no ~~Company~~multi-deliverable ~~changed from Mr~~arrangements. ~~Birmingham~~We torecognize ~~Mr.~~revenue ~~White,~~for ~~who~~our ~~became~~software ~~the~~division ~~sole~~as ~~executive~~we ~~officer~~bill ~~and director, and principal shareholder of~~ the ~~Company. The~~monthly ~~20,000,000~~maintenance ~~shares issued to Mr~~fees. ~~White~~Acquisition ~~were~~costs ~~not~~are ~~subject~~expensed toin the ~~20-for-1~~period ~~forward stock split which was effective for all shares immediately prior to the issuance of these shares to Mr~~incurred. ~~White.~~

~~Carey~~Share ~~Birmingham~~Based ~~resigned~~Compensation as an officer and director of URM effective immediately upon acceptance of the appointment of Steven L. White as a director following the closing of the 2008 Agreement. In addition, Mr. Birmingham forgave all debts owed to him including the Line of Credit totaling $84,403 and $11,159 of interest. He also cancelled the remaining 600,000 warrants he held to purchase shares of the Company’s stock and agreed to release the Company from any and all claims he may have against the Company.

The ~~company~~Company ~~offices~~accounts infor share-based compensation under the ~~office~~fair ofvalue recognition provisions such that compensation cost is measured at the ~~President~~grant date based on athe ~~rent~~value ~~free~~of ~~month~~the toaward ~~month~~and ~~basis~~is expensed ratably over the vesting period. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the percentage of awards which will be forfeited, stock volatility, the expected life of the award, and other inputs. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from the estimates, share-based compensation expense and the Company's results of operations could be materially impacted.

F-79

~~NOTE~~The 5Company –may ~~WARRANTS~~also issue restricted stock to consultants for various services Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock is measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. The Company recognizes these service expenses and a corresponding increase to additional paid-in-capital related to stock issued for services. When stock is issued as payment for past services provided, accordingly, all shares issued are fully vested, and there is no unrecognized compensation associated with these transactions. If stock is issued in advance of service performance expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period.

~~Summary~~Advertising ~~information regarding outstanding warrants is as follows:~~Costs

	Weighted
	Average
	Exercise	Exercise
	Warrants	Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2006	1,136,000	$ .0625
No activity	-
Outstanding at December 31, 2007	1,136,000	$ .0625
Cancelled on April 4, 2008	(600,000)
Outstanding at December 31, 2008	536,000	$ .0625

The costs of advertising are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses are included in the Company’s operating expenses. Advertising expense was $3,124 and $2,210 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively

~~All~~Basic ~~warrants~~and ~~outstanding~~Diluted asIncome ofPer ~~December~~Share ~~31, 2008 are exercisable.~~

~~NOTE~~Basic 6income -per ~~INCOME~~share ~~TAXES~~is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per share is computed similar to basic income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares, such as stock issued upon conversion of our series A preferred stock, had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

~~Due~~Common tostock ~~the~~equivalents ~~changes~~for inthe ~~control~~years inended ~~October~~December ~~2003~~31, ~~and~~2009 inwere ~~April~~dilutive. ~~2008~~Therefore, the ~~net~~diluted ~~operating~~weighted ~~loss~~average iscommon ~~limited~~shares ~~under~~outstanding ~~Section~~for ~~382~~the ofperiods ~~the~~ended ~~Internal~~December ~~Revenue~~31, ~~Code. The~~2009 ~~net~~includes ~~deferred~~approximately ~~tax~~8,944,444 ~~asset~~shares ~~generated~~that bycould ~~the~~dilute ~~loss~~earnings ~~carry-forward~~per ~~has~~share ~~been~~in ~~fully~~future ~~reserved~~periods. ~~Net~~ ~~operating~~There ~~loss~~were ~~carryforwards~~no ~~approximated~~common ~~$100,000~~stock asequivalents offor the year ended December 31, 2008 and ~~expire~~therefore ~~twenty~~the ~~years~~earnings ~~from~~per ~~when~~share ~~incurred~~calculation, for both basic and dilutive were 8,000,000 shares.

AtBasic income per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income per share is computed similar to basic income per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares, such as convertible stock, had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Includes 8,944,444 convertible preferred shares that could dilute earnings per share. For the year ended December 31, ~~deferred~~2009, ~~tax~~preferred ~~assets~~shares ~~consisted~~were convertible into 10,500,000 shares of common stock and the ~~following:~~weighted average number of common stock equivalent shares were included in the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding.

		2008		2007
Deferred tax assets
Net operating losses	$	15,270	$	8,700
Less: valuation allowance		(15,270)		(8,700)
Net deferred tax asset	$	-	$	-

The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted per share computations for earnings per share as follows.

NOTE 7 – STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


		2009		2008
Net Income (Loss)	$	34,299	$	(179)

Weighted average shares, basic		9,326,000		8,000,000
Convertible preferred shares		8,944,444		-
Weighted average shares, dilutive	$	18,270,444	$	8,000,000

Earnings per share, basic	$	0.00	$	(0.00)
Earnings per share, dilutive	$	0.00	$	(0.00)

InNOTE ~~September~~3 ~~2007,~~- ~~our~~RECENT ~~then~~ACCOUNTING ~~majority~~PRONOUNCEMENTS owner, Carey Birmingham, our sole officer and Director, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Mastodon Ventures, Inc.(“MVI”)), whereby he agreed to sell an aggregate of 90.2% of our outstanding common stock to MVI, under certain terms and conditions. The agreement was terminated in April 2008.

FIn August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-804, Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments — Amendment to Section 480-10-S99. This ASU represents an update to Section 480-10-S99, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, per Emerging Issues Task Force Topic D-98, “Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities.” The adoption of ASU 2009-04 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This Accounting Standards Update amends Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures - Overall, to provide guidance on the fair value measurement of liabilities. The adoption of ASU 2009-05 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

F-10

In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-08, Earnings Per Share Amendments to Section 260-10-S99. This Codification Update represents technical corrections to Topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per Share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that Includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock. The adoption of ASU 2009-08 will not have material impact on our consolidated financial statements

In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-09, Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. This Accounting Standards Update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee. Section 323-10-S99-4 was originally entered into the Codification incorrectly. The adoption of ASU 2009-09 will not have material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820), Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) . This Accounting Standards Update amends Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures > Overall, to provide guidance on the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The adoption of ASU 2009-12 will not have material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009 FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing (effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009, and interim periods with those fiscal years for outstanding arrangements. Effective for interim or annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2009 for arrangements entered into in those periods.) (FASB Accounting Standard Codification 470-20-50-2A through 50-2C; 470-20-65-3). Management does not believe this standard will have any future impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting standard, which was integrated into the Codification in December 2009, ASU No. 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (ASU No. 2009-17). ASU No. 2009-17 amends previously issued accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities to require an enterprise to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This amended consolidation guidance for variable interest entities also replaces the existing quantitative approach for identifying which enterprise should consolidate a variable interest entity, which was based on which enterprise is exposed to a majority of the risks and rewards, with a qualitative approach, based on which enterprise has both (1) the power to direct the economically significant activities of the entity and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. This new standard may affect how we account for the consolidation of common structures, such as joint ventures, equity method investments, collaboration and other agreements and purchase arrangements. Under this revised guidance, more entities may meet the definition of a variable interest entity, and the determination about whether an enterprise should consolidate a variable interest entity is required to be evaluated continuously. This standard is effective for us for interim and annual periods beginning after January 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following, as of December 31,:


		2009		2008
Office equipment	$	15,343	$	-
Software development costs		220,060		59,950
		235,403		59,950
Accumulated depreciation		3,069		-
	$	232,334	$	59,950

Included in costs above the software costs have not been amortized until the software is fully implemented.

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $3,069 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

F-11

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY

The Company has received or has issued advances or other temporary financial assistance, from time to time, with affiliated companies. These advances are typically short-term in nature, for the purpose ranging from funding acquisitions or for cash flow requirements. No amounts were due from or to the Company at December 31, 2009. The Company had $409,973 due from an affiliated company and $40,000 due to a shareholder as of December 31, 2008.

The amounts and terms of the above transactions may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts and terms that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent third parties.

NOTE 7 – DEBT

Line of Credit

The Company outsources certain of its accounts receivables under a trade credit outsourcing agreement with a third party. The third party assumes credit risk for the accounts they purchase under the agreements and charges the company certain administration fees for handling the collections of these accounts. In addition the Company is allowed to take advances up to one million dollars limited by 85% of eligible receivables. Advances under the line of credit are available to fund acquisitions, capital expenditures, or for other corporate purposes. The line of credit is collateralized by accounts receivable and other assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. A processing commission rate of 1% is applied on the initial $20 million and .75% thereafter. of the face value of each account assigned. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at the Bank’s prime rate plus 2.00% and are due on demand.

One of our officers and shareholder has personally guaranteed the line of credit.

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had $251,584 and $187,555, respectfully, in advances under the trade credit outsourcing agreement.

During the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company drew on the trade credit outsource agreement in the amount of $4,767,621 and made payment of $4,703,592. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, based on available collateral, there was $0 available for borrowing under the trade credit outsourcing agreement based on advances outstanding.

NOTE 8 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value at $.001 per share. On June 30, 2009, the Company issued 700,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) and 500,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”) as part of the acquisition of Federal Logistics, Inc. (FL) and Optimized Transportation Software, Inc. (OTSI), becoming wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. At various times throughout the current quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 350,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 1,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to various consultants for services they provided the Company. Series A is convertible to common on a ten for one basis. Each share of preferred stock is entitled to ten votes. Neither series has redemption, dividend, or liquidation rights.

Common Stock

In connection with the transaction, the Company also entered into a registration rights agreement with certain pre-closing holders of common stock of the Company, with no monetary penalties.

F-12

At various times throughout the current quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 7,134,000 shares of Common Stock to various consultants for services they provided the Company.

NOTE 9 – PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

The Company has not recognized an income tax benefit for its operating losses generated based on uncertainties concerning its ability to generate taxable income in future periods. The tax benefit for the periods presented is offset by a valuation allowance established against deferred tax assets arising from operating losses and other temporary differences, the realization of which could not be considered more likely than not. In future periods, tax benefits and related deferred tax assets will be recognized when management considers realization of such amounts to be more likely than not.

The provision for income taxes is different from that which would be obtained by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes. The items causing this difference are as follows:


		2009		2008
Income tax provision (benefit) at statutory rate	$	22,400	$	-
State income tax expense (benefit), net of federal benefit		(1,000)		-
		21,400		-
Valuation Allowance		-		-
	$	21,400	$	-

All taxes are current, no deferred tax assets or liabilities have been recorded.

NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

Our principal executive offices are located at 707 Grant Street, Suite 2307, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and consist of approximately 1,800 feet of office space which we lease for approximately $2,600 per month pursuant to the lease expiring November 30,2013. We also maintain approximately 6,000 feet of warehouse space in Hanging Rock Ohio, which we lease on a month to month basis.

Future minimum lease payments:


2010	$	31,296
2011		31,296
2012		31,296
2013		28,688
2014		-
thereafter		-
	$	122,576

Contingencies

From time to time the Company may be a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. Management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

F-13

NOTE 11 - SEGMENT INFORMATION

Segment information is presented based on a management approach that designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the sources of the Company's reportable segments. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making groups, in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance of the segment.

The Company's operations during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are classified into two reportable business segments: Logistics Services and Supply Chain Software. Each of these segments is organized based upon the nature of products and services offered. Summarized financial information about each segment is provided below:


			Supply
	Logistic		Chain		Consolidated
	Services		Software		Totals
For the year ended December 31, 2009
Revenues from external customers	$	6,636,186	$	177,379	$	6,813,565
Costs of revenues		5,776,749		73,804		5,850,553
		859,437		103,575		963,012
Selling and general and administrative		728,316		109,599		837,915
Segment profit (loss) from operations	$	131,121	$	(6,024)	$	125,097

Assets	$	151,429	$	227,113	$	378,542


For the year ended December 31, 2008
Revenues from external customers	$	3,292,617	$	385,100	$	3,677,717
Costs of revenues		2,957,224		211,868		3,169,092
		335,392		173,233		508,625
Selling and general and administrative		260,250		221,967		482,217
Segment profit (loss) from operations	$	75,142	$	(48,734)	$	26,408

Assets	$	1,960,672	$	51,045	$	2,011,717

F-14

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In January 2010, the company acquired Light Logistics, Inc and Light Express, Inc. In exchange for the assets of the Companies, the Company issued 909,091 shares of common stock and issued a note in the amount of $500,000. In the transaction goodwill has been recognized utilizing the purchase method, resulting from the excess of the valued consideration given greater than the fair market value of the assets, less the liabilities assumed. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques were used to allocate the purchase price of acquired property between equipment, debt liabilities assumed and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities.

Presented is the condensed proforma information of the consolidated entity, as it would have been presented had the transaction occurred prior to the year end.


Condensed Proforma Balance Sheet As of December 31, 2009 and 2008
		2009		2008
Assets
	Total current assets	$	146,208	$	1,951,767
	Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $3,069		1,032,334		270,737
	Goodwill		330,013		-
	Other Assets		-		20,276
Total Assets		$	1,508,555	$	2,242,780

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
	Total liabilities		796,316		1,932,388
	Capital Stock		315,739		200
	Retained Earnings		396,500		310,192
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	1,508,555		2,242,780


Condensed Proforma Statement of Operations For the Years Ended December 31. 2009 and 2008
		2009		2008

Revenue		$	11,198,798	$	10,165,060
Costs and expenses:
	Cost of transportation		9,388,396		8,417,257
	Selling, general and administrative expenses		1,654,695		1,482,837
	Total costs and expenses		11,043,091		9,900,094
Other income (expense):
	Interest expense		(69,398)		(33,536)
	Income before income tax (expense) benefit	$	86,309	$	231,429

F-15

Filing Compare · OPTIMIZED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, INC.