UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

~~X .~~S ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, ~~2008~~2009

.£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 000-51732

AIMS WORLDWIDE, INC.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)


Nevada	87-0567854
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)

10400 Eaton Place, #203

Fairfax, VA 22030

(Address of principal executive offices)

Issuer’s telephone number: 703-621-3875, x2254

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $.001 par Value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. . £ Yes ~~X .~~ S No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. . £ Yes ~~X .~~ S No

Note – checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. X S . Yes . £ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulations S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ~~X .~~ S

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer . ~~Accelerated~~£ ~~filer .~~

~~Non-accelerated~~Accelerated filer . ~~(Do~~£ ~~not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company X .~~

~~Indicate~~Non-accelerated byfiler £ (Do not check ~~mark~~if ~~whether the registrant is~~ a ~~shell~~smaller ~~company~~reporting ~~(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act~~company)~~. .Yes X .No~~

~~State~~Smaller ~~the~~reporting aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter:company ~~Our~~S common stock is listed on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), under the symbol “AMWW.” The aggregate market value (market cap) of the issuer’s common stock held by non-affiliates at March 31, 2009, is deemed to be $1,407,889 (6,704,283 shares at 21 cents per share).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). £Yes SNo

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: Our common stock is listed on the Over the Counter

Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), under the symbol “AMWW.” The aggregate market value (market cap) of the issuer’s common stock held by non-affiliates at March 31, 2010, is deemed to be $3,710,030 (46,375,375 shares at eight cents per share).

Note. If a determination as to whether a particular person or entity is an affiliate cannot be made without involving unreasonable effort and expense, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates may be calculated on the basis of assumptions reasonable under the circumstances, provided that the assumptions are set forth in this Form.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDING DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. . £ Yes . £ No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

Class	Outstanding as of March 31, ~~2009~~2010
Common Stock, $.001 par value	5262,~~141~~272,~~279~~840

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

PART I

Item 1. Description of Business

Forward-Looking Statement Notice

When used in this report, the words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect the Company’s future plans of operations, business strategy, operating results, and financial position. Persons reviewing this report are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those included within the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.

General

We incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 7, 1996, under the name B & R Ventures, Inc. On March 28, 1999, we acquired all of the common stock of Enjoy The Game, Inc., a Missouri corporation, and changed our name to EtG Corporation.

On December 17, 2002, we acquired AIMS Worldwide, Inc., incorporated in Nevada on October 7, 2002, as Accurate Integrated Marketing Solutions Worldwide, Inc., to act as the successor to AIMS Group, LLC which was organized in Virginia in November 2001. As a result of this acquisition, we changed our name to AIMS Worldwide, Inc.

Our principal executive offices are at 10400 Eaton Place, #203, Fairfax, VA 22030. Our telephone number is 703-621-3875 and our fax number is 703-621-3870. Our URL is www.AIMSWorldwide.com

Our Business

AIMS Worldwide, Inc. (“AIMS” or “AIMS™”) is aan ~~vertically~~ integrated marketing ~~communications~~services ~~consultancy~~company, providing ~~organizations~~clients with ~~its~~impactful, ~~AIMSolutions~~cost ~~branded~~effective ~~focused~~and measurable marketing solutions, atresulting ~~the~~in ~~lowest~~increased ~~possible~~sales ~~cost~~and customer retention. AIMS (Accurate Integrated Marketing Solutions) increases ~~the~~ accuracy, ofreduces ~~the~~cost, ~~strategic~~ and ~~tactical~~improves ~~direction~~results of its ~~client's~~clients’ marketing ~~program~~programs, ~~improves results and reduces the cost,~~ by refocusing "traditional mass marketing" programs to a more ~~strategic~~targeted and "One-2-One" relationship with the ideal customer. To further differentiate from the rest of the market, AIMS™ places intense focus on the Return on Marketing Investment, or "ROMI™." The Company's goal is to provide clients with a measurable return by first conducting an audit of the client's existing marketing strategy in order to deliver an increased return on their investment. AIMS is accelerating its growth by targeting and acquiring a group of core competency media and marketing communications services companies.

ItThe world of marketing services is ~~our~~undergoing ~~intention~~revolutionary tochange ~~structure~~with the ~~Company~~introduction ~~into~~and ~~seven~~application ~~major~~of ~~business~~new ~~units~~digital ~~("MBUs"): AIMSolutions~~technologies ~~Consulting,~~vs. ~~Advertising~~sole ~~Services,~~reliance ~~Strategy~~on traditional media and ~~Planning,~~methods. AIMS ~~Public~~differentiation ~~Affairs,~~strategy ~~Public~~is ~~Relations,~~based ~~Digital~~on ~~Marketing,~~clients’ need for both traditional and ~~Media~~new ~~Properties~~approaches. Accordingly, Toour ~~this~~focus ~~end~~is weon ~~have~~bridging ~~entered~~the ~~strategic~~art ~~partnerships,~~of ~~established~~marketing ~~select~~with ~~alliances,~~the ~~acquired~~science ~~certain~~of ~~subsidiaries~~marketing, thereby bringing clients more balanced and ~~are~~impactful insolutions. To further differentiate from the ~~process~~rest of ~~acquiring~~the ~~additional~~market, ~~core~~AIMS ~~competency~~places ~~companies~~intense focus on the Return on Marketing Investment ("ROMI™"), to ~~achieve~~develop and maintain strong our ~~desired~~client ~~organization~~relationships.

~~AIMSolutions~~AIMS ~~during~~is ~~the~~further ~~past~~developing ~~six~~core ~~years~~competencies ~~has been a research~~ and ~~development~~accelerating ~~consulting~~growth ~~practice~~by ~~refining~~targeting ~~its accurate integrated marketing solutions scientific processes to “go to market”~~ and ~~sell~~acquiring ~~the~~ marketing ~~solution~~services ~~products~~companies to fee-paid clients. The scope of these research and process development activities has established a platform of knowledge, processes, and intellectual properties, sufficient as a proof-of-concept to introduce AIMSolutions in 2007 and realized in 2008. Based on the aforementioned, management believes that wesupport ~~have completed~~ our ~~research~~strategy and ~~development~~create ~~stage, and AIMSolutions will be expanding its revenue-driven consulting practice~~differentiation.

Going forward, our Company will consist of five operating business groups: AIMS Public Affairs Group, AIMS Public Relations Group, AIMS Local Community Marketing Group, AIMS Interactive Group, and AIMSolutions Consulting.

AIMS Public Affairs Group, via our IKON Public Affairs Group operating company, concentrates on bringing the best and latest information and ideas from around the United States concerning political candidates, public issues, public policy, public and government advocacy, legislation, appropriation, state and local ballot measures. This group provides solutions to finding, disseminating, circulating, and marketing information on issues and organizations concerning local, state and national governments at the lowest possible cost.

AIMS Public Relations Group will concentrate on creating public relations, publicity, promotions, special events, product, and brand placement through various media, networking and promotion channels of “earned media” for its clients at the lowest possible cost.

AIMS Local Community Marketing Group, through its operating units BrandStand Group, Inc., Streetfighter Marketing, Inc., and Bill Main and Associates, provides marketing research, strategy, planning, consulting, and training programs that provide cost-effective local community marketing solutions and techniques to clients' marketing initiatives.

AIMS Interactive Group focuses its activities on using and applying digital technologies for improving program results and ROMI™ for AIMS clients.

AIMSolutions Consulting Group focuses on the use and application of the AIMS ROMI™ process to provide an audit of the client's existing marketing strategy and plans, marketing research, analysis and reports from which to initiate new marketing strategies, plans, and measurement tools. AIMSolutions manages this entire process and initiative for its clients, with the goal of delivering clients an increased and measurable return on their investment. AIMSolutions has undertaken a number of client beta-tests in the ongoing development of its integrated marketing solution process. Beta-test clients have been in a number of applications industries, including public policy issues, political campaign marketing, consumer electronics, medical and health care, distribution services, consumer package goods, restaurant, food service, and hospitality. The scope of these industry development activities has established a platform of knowledge, processes, and intellectual properties, and AIMSolutions is entering its going-concern, revenue-driven consulting practice.

In addition to AIMS own core competencies, the Company has developed a number of alliances who bring complementary capabilities, such as, marketing research and advertising services. Through the combination of companies AIMS has acquired, partnerships it has developed, and the continued development of core competencies through organic growth and acquisition, AIMS will continue to build strength in these five core areas of operations.

Trademarks and Licenses

We hold common law trademarks on AIMS™, ~~and~~ ROMI™, and One-2-One™. AIMS™ is a unique doctrine, process, intellectual property, delivery system and corporate development method integrated into what we believe is a powerful client/customer -centric professional service model.

Our website, www.aimsworldwide.com is the registered internet domain names owned and controlled by AIMS.

We also hold a technology license agreement with Advocast, Inc., a proprietary public issues digital marketing application service provider.

Subsidiaries

As part of its corporate development core competency acquisition strategy, AIMS Worldwide, Inc., owns the following subsidiaries:

Harrell Woodcock Linkletter & Vincent, Inc.

On April 15, 2005, AIMS acquired Harrell Woodcock Linkletter & Vincent, Inc., a Florida corporation (“HWL&V”). The purchase price for the transaction was 500,000 shares of restricted common stock of AIMS in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of HWL&V in cash and stock. Included in the transaction were letters of intent issued by HWL&V to two specialty-marketing consulting firms, which AIMS™ ~~has~~subsequently acquired. Renamed “"Harrell, Woodcock, & Linkletter,”" Company management plans for this subsidiary to be an active strategy, planning, and marketing consulting group offering innovative new business and new market development services.

ATB Media, Inc.

On April 19, 2004, we acquired ATB Media, Inc. ("ATB"). ATB was formed to acquire radio broadcast properties and/or invest in companies that had previously acquired radio broadcast properties in small- and medium-sized markets and to use innovative techniques and low cost, engineering-driven strategies to upgrade these properties into successful radio stations by relocating such properties to larger markets, increasing authorized power and/or authorized hours of operation. ATB owns rights to receive income participation from one or more radio stations and other businesses. ~~Due~~The ~~to the profit participation agreements, the Company determined that the current fair value of these advances and investments has increased to an amount in excess of $5,400,000; however, the~~ merger has been recorded at book value because the companies were under common control.

ATB currently owns a 40% participating interest in Radio Station KCAA in Loma Linda/San Bernardino, Calif., and owns rights to receive income participation from one or more radio stations if and when acquired. KCAA operates in a 24-hour broadcast cycle. On March 19, 2008, station management received approval from the FCC for a construction permit that would allow station management to expand the current facility to support daytime broadcasts at 10,000 watts.

AIMS and Broadcast Management Systems in Houston, the majority interest and operating owner of KCAA-AM Radio Station in Loma Linda/San Bernardino, Calif., have agreed to list the station for sale now that a 10,000 watt construction permit approval has been received from the FCC and anticipate selling the station in 2009. However, there are no guarantees that or assurances that market conditions will be conducive to providing a suitable and acceptable purchaser.4

On November 13, 2009, Christopher Noble and Angela Phillips, the only two secured creditors of ATB Media, Inc., filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (the “Complaint”). The Complaint alleges that ATB is in default under the terms of two promissory notes dated December 31, 1999, each in the amount of $500,000 in favor of Plaintiffs (the “Noble/Phillips Indebtedness”). The prayer for relief in the Complaint requests entry of judgment in favor of Plaintiffs for unpaid principal and interest in the aggregate amount of $3,723,088.14, plus per diem interest from and after November 13, 2009 in the aggregate amount of $1,535.44, attorneys fees in the aggregate amount of $4,000 (if judgment is entered by default), and a decree for the judicial sale of the ATB Collateral. The ATB Collateral consists of all of the assets of ATB. The Company does not intend to contest the entry of the default judgment. As a result, the Company expects that judgment will be entered for Plaintiffs as requested in the Complaint, and that Plaintiffs will accede to ownership of all of the assets of ATB. The Company does not believe it has any outstanding exposure with respect to the Noble/Phillips Indebtedness (none has been alleged) and, that upon entry of the default judgment, and consummation of related foreclosure proceedings, the Noble/Phillips Indebtedness will have been satisfied, at which point ATB will recognize a gain resulting from the foreclosure sale.

Streetfighter Marketing, Inc.

On October 24, 2006, the Company entered an agreement with the shareholders of Streetfighter Marketing, Inc. (d/b/a Street Fighter Marketing), whereby the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of Streetfighter in exchange for 722,222 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in a transaction valued at $650,000. The agreement required the Company to enter into employment agreements with two Streetfighter employees.

Streetfigher Marketing, Inc., headquartered in ~~Columbus~~Gahanna, Ohio, specializes in speaking, motivation, publishing, and training businesses how to market, promote, and increase sales on a shoestring budget. The Streetfighter client list includes AT&T, American Express, Walt Disney, Pizza Hut, Honda, Sony, Goodyear, Marvel Comics, The City of Dallas, the State of Arkansas, the Country of India, and Sylvan Learning Centers.

Bill Main and Associates

On May 16, 2007, the Company completed the purchase of Barbara Overhoff, Inc., d/b/a Bill Main and Associates, in Chico, Calif. Total AIMS Worldwide, Inc., payment was 850,000 shares of restricted common stock and $175,000 in cash. Bill Main and Associates is a leading strategy, planning, publishing, and consulting firm in the restaurant, food service, and hospitality industry. A published author and noted speaker, Chairman Tucker W. “Bill” Main is a recognized authority in restaurant marketing, operations, and management. He is a former President of the California Restaurant Association. In addition, the Company, its management and employees worked jointly and in cooperation with BrandStand Group, Inc., in the food services, hospitality and restaurant industries seeking opportunities and client development.

Target America, Inc.

Acquired July 26, 2007, with a base in Fairfax, Va., and offices in Indianapolis and Chicago, Target America, Inc., was founded in 1995, under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, to meet the rapidly changing needs of not-for-profit, charity, and philanthropy fundraising professionals. The ~~company~~Company is a constant innovator in the field of contributor and donor prospect research, developing and launching a completely online prospect screening service in 2003. Target America continues to upgrade and develop this tool, which now includes a wide range of services from automated Internet research and Target Tiger, and internet search engine, to an integrated management system to serve not only the not-for profit community, but business, commerce database profiles, retail, and financial institutions as well.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC

On July 26, 2007, AIMS Worldwide, Inc., acquired 55% of IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC (“"IPAG”"), a limited liability company formed under the laws of Delaware ~~laws~~. Post-closing, IPAG, through its offices in Washington, D.C., area and Denver, continues the business previously conducted by IKON Holdings, Inc., providing consulting services in connection with political campaigns and ~~issue~~public and government advocacy. Management of AIMS determined, while evaluating this potential acquisition, that the primary value to be acquired was the value of the customer list and services of the two principals, including the reputation and work product and methods of those individuals.

BrandStand Group Inc.

On June 26, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of the common stock of BrandStand Group, Inc. Consideration of the acquisition was 1,600,000 shares of AIMS common stock, a one year note payable in the amount of $400,000 and a cash payment of $400,000, of which $50,000 had previously been placed on deposit.

BrandStand Group, Inc. is a premier provider of restaurant brand positioning, management and communication strategies, helping restaurant and food service owners and franchisees to develop and differentiate their brand, assisting them to align and deliver their brand promise and helping them in communicating their message. BrandStand Group, Inc. clients include national and regional accounts such as Silver Diner, Burger King, Schlotzsky’s and Z-Pizza. BrandStand researched, developed, and utilizes a scientific approach to build client retail establishment traffic, new customer trial, customer frequency and loyal customer sales and revenues. BrandStand Group applies a scientific methodology to build client customers and revenues at the lowest possible cost. Its use of science on a micro basis parallels the model that AIMS Worldwide developed and applies to the marketing paradigm. It is for this micro-to-macro perspective that AIMS Worldwide acquired BrandStand Group.

Competition

Marketing and Media services in ~~its~~ various forms are ~~one~~some of the most competitive segments of business, commerce and enterprise management. With ~~its~~the ~~recent~~ introduction, changes, and dynamics caused by ~~new~~ online/ interactive digital communication technologies to the traditional/offline communications mediums (broadcast, satellite cast, print, post, and telephone) the marketing landscape has become one of the most ~~complex~~ competitive ~~and revolutionary tapestries~~ in the world.

Our internal research indicates that an estimated ~~worldwide~~ $1 trillion plus is spent worldwide annually on the full range of marketing, marketing communications, marketing services, media, and delivery systems. This is a massive, diverse, and fragmented service industry. As such, globally there can be little doubt as to the competition in the marketing services space in which the leading companies, agencies, and firms are better established, positioned, branded, staffed and capitalized than our Company.

AIMS management has undertaken comprehensive industry research including evaluation of the full scope of marketing services including, but not limited to, advertising (Top 100), direct marketing (Top 20), sales promotion (Top 20), public relations (Top 20), market research (Top 25), digital marketing technologies (Top 100), and marketing support services (Top 200). Based on our analysis, AIMS believes that traditional media and marketing services, while with far greater financial and human resources than the company, do not currently offer the integrated solutions AIMS provides.

Regulation

Our business is not regulated by any governmental agency and approval from any governmental agency is not required for us to market or sell our products. However, some of our acquisitions may be subject to regulatory oversight. For example, the Federal Communications Commission regulates the radio property.

Employees

AIMS Worldwide, Inc., corporate headquarters has five employees, and, including our operating subsidiaries, has a total of approximately twenty-five employees. We plan to hire additional personnel on an as-needed basis as our operations expand. As of March 31, ~~2009~~2010, we continued to have no formal employment agreements in place at the corporate level, with the exception of the employment agreement with Thomas W. Cady, who joined the Company in July 2009.

Item 2. Properties

Our executive offices at 10400 Eaton Place, Suite 203, Fairfax, VA 22030, also serve as offices for ATB Media, Inc., AIMS Interactive, Inc., and Harrell Woodcock and Linkletter. Our other subsidiaries which have separate offices are located as follows: Bill Main and Associates has one office located in Chico, Calif.; BrandStand Group has one office in Lewisberry, Penn.; IKON Public Affairs Group has two main offices, one located in Arlington, Va., and the other in Denver; Streetfighter Marketing, Inc., has one office located in Gahanna, Ohio; and Target America ~~has~~had its base office in Fairfax, Va., and another location in Indianapolis.

The Company does not own any real property; all offices are leased.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Jose R. Trujillo v. Michael L. Foudy, AIMS Worldwide, Inc., American Institute for Full Employment, The Committee for Good Common Sense, et al., in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, case No. 502005CA005603XXXXMB, ~~affidavit~~affadavit filed December 9, 2005.

In this case, an individual in Florida named Jose Trujillo sued several corporations and individuals, including AIMS, alleging breach of contract. AIMS management disputes that it should be a party to this suit because Mr. Foudy did not have the authority to bind the Company to any agreement. Management isexpects ~~working~~this ~~with~~legal ~~its~~matter ~~counsel on preparing~~ to ~~file~~be ~~for~~settled ~~summary~~as ~~judgment~~no ~~and~~activity ~~expects~~has ~~this~~occurred ~~legal~~in ~~matter~~more tothan bea ~~settled~~year.

The case is being handled by the following local Florida counsel: Carl A. Cascio, Esquire, Carl A. Cascio, P.A., 525 N.E. Third Avenue, #102, Delray Beach, FLFlorida 33444. Phone is 561-274-7473. 561-274-8305 is facsimile; e-mail: casciolw@bellsouth.net.

On November 13, 2009, Christopher Noble and Angela Phillips, the only two secured creditors of ATB Media, Inc. (“ATB”), the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (the “Complaint”). The Complaint alleges that ATB is in default under the terms of two promissory notes dated December 31, 1999, each in the amount of $500,000 in favor of Plaintiffs (the “Noble/Phillips Indebtedness”). The prayer for relief in the Complaint requests entry of judgment in favor of Plaintiffs for unpaid principal and interest in the aggregate amount of $3,723,088.14, plus per diem interest from and after November 13, 2009 in the aggregate amount of $1,535.44, attorneys fees in the aggregate amount of $4,000 (if judgment is entered by default), and a decree for the judicial sale of the ATB Collateral. The ATB Collateral consists of all of the assets of ATB. The Company does not intend to contest the entry of the default judgment. As a result, the Company expects that judgment will be entered for Plaintiffs as requested in the Complaint, and that Plaintiffs will accede to ownership of all of the assets of ATB. The Company does not believe it has any outstanding exposure with respect to the Noble/Phillips Indebtedness (none has been alleged) and, that upon entry of the default judgment, and consummation of related foreclosure proceedings, the Noble/Phillips Indebtedness will have been satisfied, at which point ATB will recognize a gain resulting from the foreclosure sale.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

PART II

Our common stock is listed on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol AMWW. AtOn March 31, ~~2009~~2010, there were ~~417~~435 shareholders of record holding 5262,~~141~~272,~~279~~840 shares of common stock ~~with 50,117,466 distributed~~. Holders of the common stock have no preemptive rights and no right to convert their common stock into any other securities. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. The following table shows the highs and lows of the closing bid and ask on the Company’s stock for the previous two years.

	Closing Bid		Closing Ask
2007	High	Low	High	Low
Jan. 2 thru March 31	.55	.23	.70	.26
April 1 thru June 30	.55	.35	.65	.55
July 1 thru Sept. 30	.51	.35	.60	.36
Oct. 1 thru Dec. 31	.40	.15	.60	.25
	Closing Bid		Closing Ask
2008	High	Low	High	Low
Jan. 2 thru March 31	.25	.16	.30	.20
April 1 thru June 30	.30	.17	.65	.20
July 1 thru Sept. 30	.35	.05	.55	.10
Oct. 1 thru Dec. 31	.12	.04	.30	.08

Closing Bid

Closing Ask

2008

High

Low

High

Low

Jan. 2 thru March 31

.25

.16

.30

.20

April 1 thru June 30

.30

.17

.65

.20

July 1 thru Sept. 30

.35

.05

.55

.10

Oct. 1 thru Dec. 31

.12

.04

.30

.08

Closing Bid

Closing Ask

2009

High

Low

High

Low

Jan. 2 thru March 31

.10

.055

.21

.08

April 1 thru June 30

.22

.05

.55

.15

July 1 thru Sept. 30

.30

.10

.55

.15

Oct. 1 thru Dec. 31

.15

.07

.165

.10

The above quotations, as provided by Pink Sheets, LLC, represent prices between dealers and do not include retail markup, markdown, or commission. In addition, these quotations do not represent actual transactions.

We have not paid or declared any dividends since inception and do not intend to declare any such dividends in the foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends is subject to limitations imposed by Nevada law. Under Nevada law, dividends may be paid to the extent that a corporation’s assets exceed its liabilities and it is able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During 2009, we issued 1,992,500 shares of common stock as part of acquisition purchases, 484,277 shares for cash, 11,884,037 shares for services, 475,000 shares to guarantee loans, and 816,406 for debt extinguishment.

During 2008, we issued 6,161,111 shares of common stock for total proceeds of $1,085,700. In addition we issued 263,090 shares of common stock for services valued at $112,738 and we issued 1,120,503 shares of common stock valued at $89,640 to participants in IKON's campaign media buying program. The shares issued were recorded at fair value based on the market price on the date of the grant. At December 31, 2008, stock subscriptions totaling $252,500 remained receivable.

During 2007, we issued 2,490,000 shares of common stock for total proceeds of $525,000. In addition we issued 676,827 shares of common stock for services valued at $290,452 and we issued 100,000 shares of common stock valued at $23,000 in payment of trade debt. We issued 825,000 shares of common stock as part of the purchase price for the acquisition of Bill Main and Associates, we issued 650,000 shares of common stock for the acquisition of Target America and we released 1,762,778 shares of common stock that were previously escrowed to complete the acquisition of Target America and IKON. We received and cancelled 200,000 shares valued at $118,000 as consideration for the sale of the Prime Time subsidiary. The shares issued were recorded at fair value based on the market price on the date of the grant. At December 31, 2007, stock subscriptions totaling $50,000 remained receivable.

The Company relied on an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Securities Act and Regulation D, Rule 506 to effect the transaction. There were no commissions paid and the value of the transaction was determined by the Board of Directors.

Common Stock

Unless otherwise noted, common shares were sold in private transactions and issued in reliance of the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The transactions do not involve any public offering or broker and no commissions were paid on the transaction.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements appearing at the end of this report.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008

We generated corporate-wide revenue of $135,~~963~~721,~~060~~503 in ~~2008~~2009 ~~which~~and ~~is a 659% percent increase the~~ revenue of $213,~~119~~963,~~459~~060 in ~~2007~~2008. None of the revenue generated in ~~2008~~2009 or ~~2007~~2008 was from related party transactions.

General and administrative operating expenses including cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009, were $147,~~850~~169,~~934~~588 compared to $514,~~081~~850,~~698~~934 in ~~2007~~2008.

ATB Media, Inc., interest expense booked in 2009 is $172,949 to nonrelated party debt holders and $61,342 to related party debt holders but recognized a gain of $71,992 from renegotiation of principal and interest debt to a related party. ATB Media, Inc., interest expense booked in 2008 is $176,050 to nonrelated party debt holders and $61,510 to related party debt holders. It is anticipated that once the judgment is rendered (See Item #1, Subsidiaries, ATB Media, Inc.) and other debt is reduced via negotiation with remaining debt holders ATB will recognize a significant Gain on Settlement of Debt(s).

For the year ending December 31, ~~2008~~2009, we had an operating loss of $1,~~274~~448,~~507~~085 compared to $31,~~189~~274,~~670~~507 in ~~2007, a difference of $1,915,163, which was a 60+% decrease from last year~~2008.

The EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) results for the Company in ~~2008~~2009 are ($~~464~~972,~~160~~018)~~. A~~ ~~more~~as ~~detail~~compared ~~accounting~~to is($464,160) ~~provided~~in ~~below under the heading "Management Comment on~~ 2008 ~~Activities~~."

~~2008~~2009 results breakdown per market segment as follows:

~~AIMSolutions~~AIMS ~~Consulting~~Public Affairs Group

WeAIMS Worldwide, Inc., Public Affairs Group consists of IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC. This segment generated $~~229~~3,~~897~~372,576 in revenue ~~from AIMSolutions client~~ during ~~2008~~2009 and anet ~~gross~~income ~~profit~~ of ($~~153~~799,~~418~~199). This ~~for~~segment ~~this~~generated ~~product~~$11,488,888 ~~category~~in revenue during 2008 and net income of ($97,448).

InThe ~~2007~~year-over-year ~~AIMSolutions~~decline ~~generated~~in ~~$91,174~~results is due to IKON’s bifurcation business model that leads to swings in revenue between election and ~~had~~non-election ayears, ~~$24~~making our financial performance cyclical. Therefore,~~641~~ ~~loss~~it ~~from~~is ~~operations~~best analyzed by examining a two-year cycle.

InIKON ~~both~~Public ~~2007~~Affairs ~~and~~Group ~~2008~~("IPAG") ~~the~~is ~~revenues~~a ~~for~~public ~~this~~issues, ~~consulting~~public ~~group~~policy, ~~were~~government ~~generated~~affairs, ~~mainly~~lobbying, ~~through~~and ~~contracts~~political ~~with~~campaign ~~Times~~firm ~~Grill~~that ~~Restaurant~~brings ~~Group,~~the anbest ~~operator~~and latest information and aideas ~~franchisee~~from ~~with~~around ~~three~~the ~~units~~United inStates ~~Jacksonville~~concerning political candidates, ~~Fla.~~public issues, ~~two~~public ~~units~~policy, inpublic ~~Baton~~and ~~Rouge~~government advocacy, ~~La.~~legislation, ~~one~~appropriation, ~~unit~~state inand ~~Mandeville,~~local Laballot measures. This group provides solutions to finding, disseminating, circulating, and ~~one~~marketing ~~unit~~information inon ~~Pensacola,~~issues ~~Fla.~~and organizations concerning local, state and ~~with~~national ~~BestLine~~governments ~~International~~at ~~research~~the lowest possible cost. Also, it is a ~~synthetic~~political ~~micro~~consulting ~~lubricant~~firm ~~consumer~~that ~~products~~seeks ~~company~~to aid its clients in ~~New~~winning ~~York~~elections ~~state~~– whether the election of candidates to office or the passage of initiative and referenda in the states. Uniquely, IKON does both and has a track record of success with both.

Another milestone for this business segment was the appointment of a new general manager. On October 17, 2008, AIMS Worldwide, Inc. announced that Joseph M. Saunders joined the company as executive vice president and general manger of AIMSolutions and president of AIMS Interactive. Mr. Saunders brought more than sixteen years of leadership, sales and product management experience in delivering marketing solutions, data products and management consulting to consumer products, financial services, franchises, retail and not-for-profit companies. Prior to joining AIMS Worldwide, Inc., Mr. Saunders was responsible for international business development and new market expansion for Digital Envoy, the leading IT intelligence company. He also led new market development, including launching new solutions for TARGUSinfo where he helped the company increase its revenue five-fold in six years. Mr. Saunders also founded Audiopoint, a speech IVS ASP serving financial services, ISPs, call centers and marketing companies. Previously, he was a management consultant for PriceWatherhouseCoopers (Coopers & Lybrand). Mr. Saunders holds an MBA from George Mason University and a B.S. in mathematics from the University of Michigan.

Subsequent to joining AIMS Worldwide, Inc., Mr. Saunders, in cooperation and cross-platform selling with Streetfighter Marketing, Inc., a subsidiary of AIMS Worldwide, Inc., signed a beta test marketing and consulting agreement with Sylvan Learning Center on November 17, 2008, to provide neighborhood marketing and “Streetfighter” tactics to specific Sylvan franchisees in two regional markets.

Advertising Services

We have not yet activated our Advertising Services segment.

Strategy and Planning Services

AIMS Worldwide, Inc., Strategy and Planning Group consists of Bill Main and Associates, Streetfighter Marketing, Inc., and Harrell, Woodcock, and Linkletter. This segment generated $839,216 in revenue during 2008 and net income of ($8,864).

In 2007 revenue for the Strategy and Planning Group was $425,305, income from operations was ($468,656), and net income was ($508,674).

In 2007 Bill Main and Associates ("BMA") revenues reflected a downturn in planning and strategy fee income. Speaking fees continued to decline consistently with foodservice and hospitality industry slowdown due to increasing costs of production and delivery of goods. Consulting fees, as a percentage of revenues increased but overall profitability, were down significantly.

In 2008, despite a difficult year for the restaurant, foodservice, and hospitality industries due to drastic increases in food and gasoline prices as well as the 4th quarter economic downturn, revenues for BMA substantially increased as a result of several new seminars and consulting services designed specifically to address industry issues. Speaking income remained stable without reductions in fees, and increases in consulting fees, planning engagements, and product sales accounted for the majority of the increase in revenue. In addition, BMA did considerable downsizing and implemented several cost reduction programs which yielded positive net income.

BMA strategy for 2009 is to concentrate on speaking engagements with food processors, distributors, and manufacturers and continued marketing to targeted segments of the market seeking opportunities to increase business and/or to mitigate losses from the general economic downturn.

Streetfighter Marketing, Inc., ("SFM") during 2008 showed significant sales growth versus the previous year in both speaking revenues and consulting revenues. At the same time there were no significant increases in overhead. Two elements attributed to the increase were the steady effort of telephone sales to promote speaking dates which occurred mostly in the first half of the year and in the 4th quarter obtaining the Sylvan Learning contract which significantly increased our consulting revenues.

The Sylvan Learning project is the largest single project that SFM has undertaken to date. We anticipate that it will generate more consulting fees in a nine month period than any previous consulting contract. That, combined with the favorable results seen by the client, has positioned SFM to take advantage of the current economic situation in which many large companies are turning to local marketing efforts to help their general sales. While economic uncertainty negatively affected our usual stream of speaking projects it has been a good environment for proposing consulting projects similar to Sylvan.

Regarding our book Street Fighter Marketing Solutions (Simon & Schuster/Free Press), in 2007 we received significant revenue from the publisher advance. Although there were no 2008 book royalties or reprints we were able to buy a significant inventory of those books, at cost during the first printing and generate some revenue; they are significant items used in the process of selling speaking, presenting workshops, and consulting products.

We anticipate that the SFM speaking product sales will increase as the overall economy improves. In preparation, we will continue to have outbound telephone sales to meeting, conference, and convention planners. Though the consulting product has much more potential, the speaking product is not only an important revenue stream but also helps keep a presence in the business community and provides important qualified leads for consulting product sales. While the speaking business has a limited amount of inventory in the form of available speaking dates, consulting projects are not limited to the availability of public personalities.

Public Affairs Services

AIMS Worldwide, Inc., Public Affairs Group consists of IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC. This segment generated $11,488,888 in revenue during 2008 and net income of ($97,448).

In 2007 revenue for the Public Affairs Group was $1,026,665, loss from operations was ($311,527), and net income was ($226,737).

~~IKON~~In ~~Public~~the ~~Affairs~~2008 ~~Group~~Presidential ~~("IPAG")~~election ~~is one of many Washington~~year, ~~D.C.-based~~IPAG ~~public~~created ~~issues,~~a ~~public~~new ~~policy,~~product ~~government~~– ~~affairs,~~Campaign ~~lobbying,~~Media ~~and~~Buying ~~political~~Services ~~campaign~~– ~~firms~~ which ~~seek~~proved to ~~advance~~be ~~the~~a ~~objectives~~significant source of ~~their~~new ~~clients in the federal regulatory and legislative processes~~revenues. ~~Also,~~In ~~it's~~the ~~one~~second quarter of ~~many~~2008 ~~political~~and ~~consulting firms which seek to aid their clients~~ in ~~winning~~preparation ~~elections~~for ~~– whether~~ the ~~election~~national ofcampaign ~~candidates~~season toIPAG ~~office~~undertook orpolitical ~~the~~issue, ~~passage~~political ofreferendum, ~~initiative~~ and ~~referenda~~political ininterest ~~the~~group ~~states~~(527s) research. ~~Almost~~IPAG ~~uniquely,~~developed ~~IKON does both and has~~ a ~~track~~unique ~~record~~media ofarbitrage ~~success~~strategy ~~with~~whereby ~~both. This~~advanced ~~bifurcation~~political inissue ~~our~~media, ~~business~~primarily ~~model~~television ~~leads~~broadcast, tocould ~~dramatic~~be ~~swings~~purchased, ininventoried, ~~revenue between election~~ and ~~non-election~~resold ~~years,~~on ~~making~~behalf ~~our~~of ~~financial~~interested ~~performance~~clients. IPAG ~~best~~intends ~~analyzed~~to bycontinue ~~examining~~its aCMBS ~~2-year~~practice ~~cycle~~in ~~including~~2010 ~~one~~and ~~even~~anticipates ~~and~~generating ~~one~~significant ~~odd~~revenue ~~numbered~~from ~~year.~~this initiative.

~~Being~~With arespect ~~Presidential~~to ~~election~~IPAG’s ~~year,~~public ~~2008~~affairs ~~offered~~practice, ~~IPAG~~2009 ~~opportunities~~continued to ~~further~~show ~~develop~~solid ~~its~~foundation; ~~campaign~~the ~~management~~election ~~practice.~~of ~~IPAG~~President ~~conducted~~Obama, ~~business~~with inhis ~~2008~~extensive inagenda ~~political~~of ~~campaigns~~proposed ~~ranging~~legislation, ~~from~~budget, ~~State~~and ~~House~~appropriations ~~races~~in toareas ~~United~~including ~~States~~healthcare, ~~Congressional~~environment, ~~races~~education, toand ~~some~~energy, ~~work~~fueled inrevenue ~~the~~initiatives ~~campaign~~and ~~for~~sustained ~~the~~its ~~U.S.~~annual ~~Presidency~~book of business.

~~IPAG~~In ~~also~~addition, ~~created~~2009, aby ~~new~~contrast, ~~product~~was ~~– advanced media buying services – which proved~~ a ~~significant~~non-election ~~source of new revenues~~year. In Despite the ~~second quarter of 2008 and in preparation for the~~ national ~~campaign~~economic ~~season IPAG undertook political issue~~downturn, ~~political~~IKON's ~~referendum,~~lobbying ~~and~~practice ~~political~~remained ~~interest~~strong ~~group~~fueled ~~(527s)~~because ~~research. IPAG~~of ~~developed~~the alegislative ~~unique~~debate ~~media~~over ~~arbitrage~~healthcare ~~strategy~~reform. IKON's ~~whereby~~revenue ~~advanced~~of ~~political~~approximately ~~issue~~$3.2 ~~media~~million, ~~primarily~~while ~~television~~substantially ~~broadcast, could be purchased, inventoried,~~ and ~~resold~~predictably onsmaller ~~behalf~~than ~~of interested clients. In the third quarter~~ 2008 ~~IPAG entered into a business services relationship with RD Marketing~~revenue, ~~LLC,~~was inquite ~~Fort~~strong ~~Collins,~~for ~~Colorado,~~our ~~whereby~~lobbying ~~IPAG~~practice. ~~applied~~In ~~its~~view ~~strategic~~of ~~research~~overall ~~and~~economic ~~received capital with which we purchased and inventoried media product. Subsequently~~conditions, weIKON ~~sold~~also ~~the~~took ~~media~~significant ~~product~~steps ~~inventory. Once~~in ~~the~~2009 ~~national~~to ~~election~~reduce ~~campaigns were completed RD Marketing received its original capital plus a small return for the campaign media buying activities and associated IPAG services~~expenses.

~~Unfortunately,~~AIMS ~~because~~Public ofRelations the sudden and sharp deepening of the recession in the fall of 2008, concurrent with the “normal” time for maximum political campaign advertising spending, and maximum rates for such spending, the final performance of CMBS was less than initially projected. However, the innovative concept was proven and the practices, procedures, processes, and structures put in place for successful application of the model in future election cycles.Group

With respect to IPAG’s lobbying practice, 2008 continued to show solid foundation; the election of President Obama, with his extensive agenda of proposed legislation, budget, and appropriations in areas including healthcare, environment, education, and energy, promises further growth of the 2009 lobbying portfolio.

Public Relations

We have not yet activated our Public Relations segment.

~~Digital~~AIMS Local Community Marketing Group

AIMS Worldwide, Inc., ~~Digital~~Local Community Marketing Group consists of ~~AIMS~~BrandStand ~~Interactive~~Group, Inc., ~~and~~Streetfighter ~~Target America~~Marketing, Inc. ~~This segment generated $1~~,~~405,419~~ inBill ~~revenue~~Main ~~during~~and ~~2008~~Associates, ~~net~~and ~~income~~Harrell, ~~of $74~~Woodcock,~~367~~ and Linkletter.

In ~~2007~~2009 ~~revenue~~the ~~for~~segment ~~the~~generated ~~Digital~~$1,277,201 ~~Marketing~~in ~~Group~~revenue ~~was~~and ($~~576~~288,~~315,~~866) in net income. This ~~from~~segment ~~operations~~generated ~~was~~$839,216 in revenue during 2008 and net income of ($~~153~~8,~~288~~864). $917,649 ~~and~~of ~~net~~that ~~income~~revenue ~~was~~and ($~~159~~100,~~410~~618) of net income were attributed to BrandStand's operations which were added to the group no June 27, 2009.

~~Target~~BrandStand ~~America,~~Marketing ~~Inc.~~Group ~~surpassed~~(BSG) reported Costs of Sales for the ~~projected~~period ~~goals~~June in27, ~~2008~~2009, ~~ending~~to ~~the~~December ~~year~~31, ~~with~~2009 to be 67% of revenue, yielding a gross margin of 33%. G&A Expense totaled $402,688 for the ~~highest~~period. G&A ~~sales~~expense ~~totals~~was inapproximately $100,000 above desired levels due to charges related to the ~~company’s~~AIMS ~~history~~transaction. ~~The~~G&A ~~increase~~also ~~over~~was ~~2007~~impacted ~~sales~~because ~~totals~~of ~~occurred~~added investment for management and business development in athe ~~climate~~joint ~~while~~effort ~~other~~with ~~company’s~~Bill ~~sales~~Main ~~were~~and ~~declining~~Associates.

~~The~~AIMS ~~fourteen~~Worldwide ~~years~~completed ~~of dedication to~~ the ~~rapidly~~acquisition ~~changing~~of ~~needs~~100% of ~~fundraising professionals has made Target America a reliable solution in~~ the ~~nonprofit~~stock ~~world. Nonprofit~~of ~~organizations~~BrandStand ~~were~~Marketing ~~beginning~~Group to(BSG) ~~see~~on aJune ~~decline~~26, ~~in giving by the end of 2008~~2009. ~~Projections~~The ~~from studies on giving~~seller, ~~related~~Timothy ~~to previous economic decline~~Cusick, ~~indicate~~remained ~~that~~as ~~decreased~~Founder ~~philanthropic~~& ~~donations~~CEO ~~typically~~after ~~start~~the atransaction ~~year~~and ~~behind~~all astaff ~~negative~~was ~~market~~retained. ~~Target~~Chris ~~America’s~~Petersen ~~mission~~was ofnamed ~~helping~~President ~~organizations~~and ~~raise~~began ~~more~~a ~~money~~planned, ~~became~~five-month ~~more~~transition ~~important~~period inon ~~2008~~July ~~due~~6, ~~to the sudden economic downturn as they were preparing for the decrease in donations~~2009. The ~~ability~~company ~~for~~initiated ~~organizations~~business todevelopment ~~focus~~growth ~~their~~activities ~~efforts~~in onAugust ~~their~~with ~~constituents that have~~ the ~~ability~~objectives ~~and~~of ~~inclination~~current toclient ~~make~~retention ~~larger~~and ~~donation~~new isclient ~~the~~development. As ~~results~~ of ~~the~~December ~~database~~31, ~~screening~~2009, ~~program~~100% ~~Target~~of ~~America~~BrandStand ~~offers.~~clients Inwere asuccessfully ~~time~~renewed ~~when~~for ~~these~~2010 ~~organizations~~annual ~~were~~engagement. The ~~preparing~~company ~~for~~relocated ~~declining~~to ~~revenues~~new ~~they~~office ~~took~~space ~~advantage~~in of the ~~technology~~Harrisburg, ~~and~~Penn., ~~services~~area ~~Target~~in ~~America~~October ~~delivers to help them through the recession~~2009.

~~Target~~On ~~America~~December ~~has~~1, a2009, ~~dedicated~~Chris ~~staff~~Petersen ~~that~~assumed ~~has~~day-to-day ~~years~~management ofresponsibility ~~experience~~for in the ~~fundraising~~company ~~industry. That experience was shared~~ at ~~industry~~the ~~conferences~~completion ~~addressing~~of ~~fundraising efforts throughout~~ the ~~country~~planned intransition ~~2008~~phase. ~~Target~~Timothy ~~America~~Cusick ~~has~~continued ~~offices~~as inFounder ~~Fairfax,~~& ~~Va.~~CEO, ~~Indianapolis,~~focused ~~and Chicago. The goal to expand with an office~~ on ~~the~~client ~~West coast was delayed to control expenses and in response to indications of a decline in nonprofit budgets for 2009~~strategy.

Street Fighter Marketing, Inc. had significant sales declines in 2009 versus the previous year in both speaking revenues and consulting revenues. Gross profit totaled nearly half of the previous year. In 2009 many clients cut back on events and conventions and use of professional speakers.

Also Sylvan Learning, which had been our biggest project at that time, terminated its contract. This reduced expected sales by half.

A bright spot in 2009 was a significant increase in book sales as a result of a keynote speech at Focus Brands.

Despite these 2009 setbacks, Streetfighter management anticipates growth in 2010; the firm has begun a new project with Focus Brands. Bookings for speaking are slow, but other projects are expected in 2010.

In 2009, because of the national economic factors in general and the impact on the food services industry in particular, Bill Main and Associates management continued its practice of downsizing its operations and implemented cost reduction programs. In addition, management and employees worked jointly and in cooperation with BrandStand Group, Inc., in the food services, hospitality, and restaurant industries seeking opportunities and client development.

~~Target~~AIMS ~~America~~Interactive saw additional growth in the area of healthcare philanthropy in 2008. More hospitals initiated action plans to increase fundraising efforts focusing on their best prospect – their patients. Target America improved their product offering in 2008 to automate the input of HIPPA compliant data of patients and return results to the fundraiser within hours of admission. The foundations were able to focus on their donors and build relationship that result in increased major donations. This initiative has been a major concentration of the Target America team and has increased the number of healthcare clients.Group

~~The~~AIMS ~~goal~~Worldwide, ofInc., ~~duplicating~~Interactive ~~the~~Group ~~nonprofit~~consists ~~success~~of inAIMS ~~other~~Interactive, ~~major~~Inc., ~~markets~~and ~~was~~Target aAmerica, ~~focal point in 2008 preparing for expanded growth in the commercial for-profit sector in the future~~Inc. AsThis ~~Target~~segment ~~America~~generated ~~continues to help nonprofits build relationships~~$889,841 ~~its data is important~~ in ~~other~~revenue ~~affluent,~~during ~~luxury~~2009 and ~~super-luxury~~net ~~commercial~~income ~~market~~of ~~sectors~~$18,466. InThis ~~this~~segment ~~economically~~generated ~~challenged~~$1,405,419 ~~time~~in ~~companies~~revenue ~~need~~during a2008 ~~better solution to target their best prospects~~ and ~~increase~~net ~~return~~income onof ~~marketing investment (“ROMI”)~~$74,367. ~~Target America is positioned to grow into new markets in 2009.~~

~~Media~~Simplex ~~Properties~~Healthcare, LA College, Medx Publishing, B2 Insights, and Detroit Trading purchased the Company’s lead management solution, Lead Optimizer. This software-as-a-solution (SAAS) program captures, scrubs, validates, verifies, scores, and assigns web leads to sales agents and clients for conversion and re-marketing programs. The Company also has built lead conversion and customer retention models for clients that drive down clients’ cost per acquisition and increase the lifetime value of their customers.

~~AIMS~~Since ~~Worldwide,~~the ~~Inc.,~~Company ~~Media~~charges ~~Properties~~clients ~~Group~~on ~~consists~~a ofper ~~ATB~~transaction ~~Media~~basis, ~~Inc. This~~its ~~segment~~cost ~~generated~~structure ~~$-0-~~is ~~revenue~~also ~~during~~based ~~2008~~on a per transaction basis. ~~Net~~The ~~income~~Lead atOptimizer ~~December~~solution 31carries a 50% cost of good sold, ~~2008~~including software, ~~for~~support, and data charges. This rate should drop as the ~~Digital~~Company ~~Marketing~~signs ~~Group~~up ~~was~~more ~~($238,288)~~customers and realizes economies of scale.

InTarget ~~2007~~America, ~~revenue~~Inc, ~~for~~after ending 2008 with the ~~Media~~highest ~~Properties~~sales ~~Group~~totals ~~was~~in ~~$-0-~~the company’s history, suffered through a downturn in 2009 because of the national economy and ~~net~~its ~~income~~effect ~~was~~on ~~($267,879)~~the nonprofit segment.

~~The~~In ~~activity associated with~~ the ~~Media~~rapidly ~~Properties~~changing ~~Group~~needs isof ~~related~~fundraising toprofessionals, ~~our~~Target ~~interest~~America inproducts ~~KCAA-AM~~have ~~Radio~~been ~~Station~~reliable solutions in ~~Loma~~the ~~Linda/San~~nonprofit ~~Bernadino, Calif~~world. ~~AIMS~~Nonprofit ~~and~~organizations ~~Broadcast~~were ~~Management~~beginning ~~Systems (“BMS”) of Houston agreed~~ to ~~sell~~see ~~ATB Media and its associated holdings in KCAA-AM. AIMS Worldwide, Inc., through ATB Media, Inc., owns~~ a ~~40%~~decline ~~participating interest~~ in ~~the~~giving ~~station. On~~by ~~March 19, 2008, Broadcast Management Systems,~~ the ~~majority~~end ~~interest and operating owner~~ of ~~KCAA, received approval from the FCC for a construction permit that would allow station management to expand the current facility to support day-time broadcasts at 10,000 watts. On July 30,~~ 2008, ~~BMS~~which ~~management~~carried ~~signed~~into ~~a non-exclusive listing agreement with CMS Station Brokerage of Pittsburgh and signed a similar agreement with EnVest Media of Richmond~~2009, ~~Va.,~~severely onimpacting ~~September~~Target 2,America’s ~~2008, to sell the station~~results.

~~There~~Target ~~are,~~America ~~however,~~saw nogrowth ~~guarantees~~in ~~that~~the orarea ~~assurances that market conditions will be conducive to providing a suitable or acceptable purchaser. BMS management continues to seek buyers on its own and, as~~ of ~~December~~healthcare ~~31,~~philanthropy ~~2008, has three parties interested~~ in ~~purchasing the station~~2008, ~~with all three parties representing narrow, but specific, market, demographical~~ and ~~audience~~renewals ~~segments~~ in ~~the~~this ~~Loma~~segment ~~Linda/San Bernardino geographical area. If a sale is successful completed, AIMS anticipates eliminating all or most~~ of the ~~debt~~business ~~resulting~~had ~~from~~positive ~~its~~results ~~acquisition~~in ~~of ATB Media on April 19~~2009, ~~2004. Most~~a oftime ~~the~~when ~~expense~~other ~~posted~~segments todecreased ~~ATB Media, Inc~~significantly.~~, during the past two years has been interest on the debt associated with the acquisition.~~

~~Management~~AIMSolutions ~~Comments~~Consulting ~~on 2008 Activities~~Group

~~Earnings~~AIMS ~~before~~Worldwide, ~~interest~~Inc., ~~taxes~~AIMSolutions Consulting Group consists of AIMSolutions Consulting and ATB Media, ~~depreciation~~Inc. In 2009 this segment generated $222,467 ~~amortization~~in revenue and ($140,422) ~~impairment~~in net income. In 2008 we generated $229,897 in revenue from AIMSolutions clients and ~~miscellaneous~~a ~~non-operating~~gross ~~adjustments~~profit of $153,418 for this product category.

~~Following~~In is2009, AIMSolutions launched new client engagements through its beta marketing program that allows customers to experience the potential ROI prior to committing a ~~table~~portion ~~calculating~~of ~~2008~~its ~~earnings~~marketing ~~before~~budget ~~interest,~~to ~~taxes~~the Company. Additionally, ~~depreciation~~the Company launched a performance-based marketing solution for organic search, ~~amortization~~email marketing, and ~~impairment~~per ~~are~~inquiry ~~deducted~~direct response television solutions to drive lower cost per acquisition for seven beta customers. Many of these clients expect to convert into long-term clients in 2010. Sample beta customers included Luuvee, Young Money, ActiveCare, Kleinert’s, Simplex Healthcare, Social Security Foundation, Consumer’s Choice Awards, and ~~miscellaneous~~Fearless ~~non~~Concversation. For these beta customers, AIMSolutions created a performance-~~operating~~based ~~adjustments~~revenue ~~are~~model ~~made:~~to help build a foundation of customers who share a need to drive customers in digital areas.

Revenue	13,963,060
Cost of sales	9,383,824
General and administrative expenses*	5,073,303
Minority interests	(29,907)
EBITDA	(464,160)

In 2008 the revenues for this consulting group were generated mainly through contracts with Times Grill Restaurant Group, an operator and a franchisee with three units in Jacksonville, Fla., two units in Baton Rouge, La., one unit in Mandeville, La., and one unit in Pensacola, Fla., and with BestLine International research, a synthetic micro lubricant consumer products company in New York state.

*ATB ~~General~~Media, ~~and~~Inc. ~~administrative~~generated ~~expenses~~$-0- dorevenue ~~not~~during ~~include~~2009 ~~interest~~and 2008. Net income at December 31, ~~taxes~~2009, ~~depreciation~~for ATB Media was ($173,067). Net ~~amortization~~income at December 31, ~~impairments~~2008, ~~and~~for ~~miscellaneous~~ATB ~~non-operating~~Media ~~adjustments~~was ($238,288).

The activity associated with ATB Media is related to our interest in KCAA-AM Radio Station in Loma Linda/San Bernardino, Calif. ATB Media owns 40% participating interest in the station. AIMS and Broadcast Management Systems ("BMS") of Houston, the majority interest owner of the radio station, agreed to sell ATB Media and its associated holdings in KCAA-AM, but has not been successful in securing a buyer.

The Company has also held discussions with the principal holders of additional indebtedness of ATB. These discussions have led to an agreement in principal calling for a cash payment in the aggregate amount of $500,000 and issuance of Company common stock in an amount calculated to return the remainder of the indebtedness in the approximate amount of $2,352,979 to these holders at an exchange rate of $1.00 for $1.00 of Company stock. The payment of the $500,000, and the value for the Company’s common stock to be issued, are each deferred until such time as the Company is able to achieve a substantial share issuance, which, as of this date, has not yet been firmly established.

Lastly, on December 31, 2009, ATB and related party debtholder Gerald Garcia, Jr., entered into a Debt Modification and Compromise Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Garcia cancelled ATB’s outstanding obligation owed to him in the amount of $71,992.

Most of the expense posted to ATB Media, Inc., during the past two years has been interest on the debt associated with the acquisition.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates

General

The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes requires us to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We have based our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements. We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The following descriptions of critical accounting policies, judgments, and estimates should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and other disclosures included in this report.

Provisions for Doubtful Accounts and Authorized Credits

We are exposed to losses due to uncollectible accounts receivable. Provisions for these items represent our estimate of actual losses based on our historical experience and are made at the time the related revenue is recognized. The provision for doubtful accounts is recorded as a charge to operating expense. Historically, we have had no losses. However, unexpected or significant future changes in trends could result in a material impact to future statements of income and cash flows.

Legal Contingencies

In connection with certain pending litigation and other claims, we have estimated the range of probable loss and provided for such losses through charges to our income statement. These estimates have been based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances at each balance sheet date and are subject to change based upon new information and future events.

From time to time, we are involved in disputes that arise in the ordinary course of business, and we do not expect this trend to change in the future. We are currently involved in one legal proceeding as discussed in “Item 3: Legal Proceedings.” We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims against us. However, even if successful, our defense against certain actions will be costly and could divert our management’s time. If the plaintiffs were to prevail on certain claims, we might be forced to pay significant damages and licensing fees, modify our business practices or even be prohibited from conducting a significant part of our business. Any such results could materially harm our business and could result in a material adverse impact on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of all or any of our segments.

Accounting for Income Taxes

We are required to recognize a provision for income taxes based upon the taxable income and temporary differences for each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires a calculation of taxes payable and an analysis of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of our assets and liabilities, including various accruals, allowances, depreciation and amortization. The tax effect of these temporary differences and the estimated tax benefit from our tax net operating losses are reported as deferred tax assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. We also assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income. To the extent we believe that it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, the deferred tax asset will not be realized, we establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the allowance in a period, we reflect the change with a corresponding increase or decrease in our tax provision in our income statement. Historically, these provisions have adequately provided for our actual income tax liabilities. However, unexpected or significant future changes in trends could result in a material impact to future statements of income and cash flows.

Asset Impairments

We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An asset is considered impaired if its carrying amount exceeds the future net cash flow the asset is expected to generate. If an asset is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value. We assess the recoverability of our long-lived and intangible assets by determining whether the unamortized balances can be recovered through undiscounted future net cash flows of the related assets. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on projected discounted future net cash flows. Impairment estimates have been based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances at each balance sheet date and are subject to change based upon new information and future events.

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Risk Factors

We have incurred losses since inception and may incur future losses.

We incurred operating losses of $~~887~~1,~~874~~567,814 in ~~2008~~2009. We do not expect to have consistent profitable operations until ~~2009~~2010 and we cannot assure that we will ever achieve or attain profitability. If we cannot achieve operating profitability, we will not be able to meet our working capital requirements, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and impair our ability to continue as a going concern.

We will encounter risks and difficulties frequently encountered by early-stage companies.

Some of these risks include the need to:

attract new AIMSolutions marketing clients and maintain current client relationships,

offer competitive pricing,

maintain and expand our network of advertising space through which we deliver the advertising component of our AIMSolutions,

achieve marketing solution campaign results that meet our clients’ objectives,

identify, attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel,

successfully implement our organic and acquisition business model,

manage our expanding operations, and

maintain our reputation and build trust with our clients.

locate, negotiate, and assimilate core competency acquisitions

attract and package the appropriate corporate finance and investment capital to underwrite our core competency acquisition corporate development.

AIMSolutions

Because AIMSolutions (our consulting service offered at the corporate level) client contracts generally can be cancelled by the client with little or no notice or penalty in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the professional consulting service contract, the termination of one or more large contracts could result in an immediate decline in our revenues.

Harrell, Woodcock, and Linkletter

Although Harrell, Woodcock, and Linkletter has no current on-going operation, we may ultimately get no return on our investment due to lack of acquisitions even though the Company has acquired in this core competency platform Bill Main and Associates and Street Fighter Marketing.

We must introduce new products and services to grow our business.

Our success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new services that address our clients’ changing demands. Any new products or services that we develop will have a high degree of risk and need to meet the requirements of our current and prospective clients and may not achieve significant market acceptance. The introduction of new products and services by our competitors, and the emergence of new industry standards, could render our existing products and services obsolete and unmarketable or require unanticipated investments in research and development. If revenues generated from the use of our technologies do not cover these development costs, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights could diminish the value of our services, weaken our competitive position, and reduce our revenues.

Our success depends in large part on our proprietary rights. In addition, we believe that our service marks and trademarks are key to identifying and differentiating our products and services from those of our competitors. We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary rights. These steps taken by us to protect our intellectual property may not prevent misappropriation of our technology or deter independent third-party development of similar technologies.

Our intellectual property currently includes AIMS (Accurate Integrated Marketing Solutions) “One-2-One”, referring to one to one marketing relationship in that the trade expression provides a stepped-up marketing power to the number 2, strengthening our clients’ relationship with their customers, end-users, households and communities.

Also included is our trademark “ROMI”, our trade expression providing out clients with a measurable, accountable return on their marketing dollars which are invested in building sales and revenues.

If we do not retain our senior management and key employees, we may not be able to achieve our business objectives.

Our future success is substantially dependent on the continued service of our senior management and other key employees, particularly Gerald Garcia, Jr., our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, BThomas W. ~~Joseph Vincent~~Cady, our ~~Chairman~~President and Chief Operating Officer, and Patrick J. Summers, our Chief Financial Officer and Recording Secretary. We may be unable to retain existing management, technical, sales and client support personnel that are critical to our success, resulting in harm to key client relationships, loss of key information, expertise or know-how and unanticipated recruitment and training costs. The loss of the services of our senior management or other key employees could make it more difficult to successfully operate our business and pursue our business goals.

We expect to pursue acquisitions or other investments, which may require significant resources and may be unsuccessful.

Part of our business strategy is to acquire or make investments in other businesses, or acquire products and technologies, to complement our current business. Any future acquisition or investment may require us to use significant amounts of cash, issue potentially dilutive equity securities, or incur debt. We may not be able to identify, negotiate, or finance any future acquisition successfully. Even if we do succeed in acquiring a business, product, or technology, we have limited experience in integrating an acquisition into our business. Acquisitions involve several risks, any of which could disrupt our business and reduce the likelihood that we will receive the expected benefits of the acquisition, including:

difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies, services and personnel of acquired businesses,

ineffectiveness or incompatibility of acquired technologies or services,

diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns,

unavailability of favorable financing for future acquisitions,

potential loss of key employees of acquired businesses,

inability to maintain the key business relationships and the reputations of acquired businesses,

responsibility for liabilities of acquired businesses, and

increased fixed costs.

We may need additional financing in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.

We may need additional funds to finance our operations, as well as to enhance our services, fund our expansion, respond to competitive pressures or acquire complementary businesses or technologies. However, our business may not generate the cash needed to finance such requirements. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our existing shareholders would be reduced, and these securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, our ability to enhance our services, fund our expansion, respond to competitive pressures or take advantage of business opportunities would be significantly limited, and we might need to significantly restrict our operations.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The financial statements of the Company appear at the end of this report beginning with the Index to Financial Statements.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2008, and these weaknesses continue to December 31, 2009. The evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Disclosure controls and procedures mean our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our quarterly evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures includes an evaluation of some components of our internal control over financial reporting, and internal control over financial reporting is also separately evaluated on an annual basis for purposes of providing the management report that is set forth below.

The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures included a review of their objectives and design, our implementation of the controls, and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Form 10-KSB. In the course of the controls evaluation, we sought to identify any past instances of data errors, control problems, or acts of fraud and sought to confirm that appropriate corrective actions, including process improvements, were being undertaken. This evaluation is performed on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions of management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concerning the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures can be reported in our periodic reports.

Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded, based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures by our management, that as of December 31, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weaknesses described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting below.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the board of directors; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of their inherent limitations, any system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the framework defined in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Material Weaknesses

The following, as reported on our December 31, 2008, SEC Form 10-K, remains as of December 31 2009:

Based on our evaluation under COSO, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2008, due to control deficiencies in three areas that we believe should be considered material weaknesses. A material weakness is defined within the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's Auditing Standard No. 5 as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The company did not sufficiently segregate duties over incompatible functions.

The company’s inability to sufficiently segregate duties is due to a lack of accounting staff. Further, management has increased the frequency of independent reconciliations of significant accounts, which mitigates the lack of segregation of duties until the accounting department is fully staffed.

Also, during 2008, the CFO has also been the Controller for the subsidiaries, which has increased the level of control over the accounting function. However, this also increased the concentration of risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected due to the lack of segregation of duties.

In conjunction with the lack of segregation of duties, the company did not institute specific anti-fraud controls.

While management found no evidence of fraudulent activity, the chief accounting officer has access to both accounting records and corporate assets, principally the operating bank account. Management believes this exposure to fraudulent activity is not material either to the operations of the company or to the financial reporting; however, management has instituted Key Controls specifically designed to prevent and detect—on a timely basis—any potential loss due to fraudulent activity.

Further, the nature of the autonomous subsidiaries is such that the subsidiaries’ management may fail to report accurately and timely significant transactions.

The CEO and CFO have been working with the subsidiaries more closely and continue to integrate a review and approval process to mitigate the possibility that transactions may go unreported.

The subsidiaries accounting staff lack the depth of accounting education and knowledge to properly apply Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

As stated above, the CFO’s duties have increased in respect to the direct supervision of the subsidiaries’ accounting staff, which management believes is sufficient to mitigate the lack of expertise to properly apply GAAP. This Key Control will be strengthened when the accounting function is fully staffed.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Item 9B. Other Information

Other than set forth herein, there are no further disclosures. ~~During the fourth quarter 2007 we reported an increase in our number of authorized shares via Form 14-C in October, and we reported the appointment of a new audit firm via Form 8-K in December.~~

During 2009 the Company received additional capital from the following related parties:

Christine Garcia

$83,500

Charles Brunie

$200,000

Thomas W. Cady

$62,500

During January 2009 the Company was loaned $125,000 from FG Investments, LLC, at an annual interest rate of 18% and warrants for 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.352 (35.2 cents) per share. The Agreement was amended in July 2009 when the Company received an additional $6,250. The Agreement was amended again in November 2009 when the Company received an additional $9,000. In January 2010 the Company agreed to a Third Amendment when FG Investments, LLC, loaned the Company an additional $6,618; in this amendment the Company agreed to an origination fee of $7,623 and warrants to purchase 152,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.352 (35.2 cents) per share.

During Summer 2009 the Company renegotiated the debt to Margaret Thomson to a cash balance due of $-0-. She received 816,406 shares of common stock and warrants for an additional 500,000 shares at $.60 (60 cents) per share as part of the settlement.

In August 2009 the Company renegotiated certain previously existing terms with FG Investments, LLC / James P. Gregory; those terms include issuing a total of 82,344 Series B Preferred shares and warrants for 1,406,250 Series B Preferred shares ; however, those shares have not been issued/documented as per agreement with both parties as the Company is awaiting the anticipated cancellation of the Liberty Growth Fund interest in the Company due to possible lack of fulfillment of the agreement by Liberty.

During Fall 2009 the Company renegotiated debt to William Tucker Main to reduce the cash balance due to him as December 31, 2009 to $20,000 plus $1,148 in interest. He will receive 150,000 shares of common stock as part of the settlement.

During Fall 2009 the Company renegotiated an agreement with Barbara Geshekter in which she received/will receive 135,000 shares of common stock.

During Fall 2009 the Company negotiated an agreement with Jeff Slutsky in which he received/will receive 165,000 shares of common stock.

During Fall 2009 the Company negotiated an agreement with Marc Slutsky in which he received/will receive 85,000 shares of common stock.

In December 2009 the Company signed a Promissory note to FG Investments, LLC, in exchange for $120,000 at an annual interest rate of 18%. In addition, the Lender received warrants for 120,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $.352 (35.2 cents) per share, and will receive an origination fee of $12,000 at maturity.

On December 19, 2008, shareholder Margaret Thomson provided the Company a $50,000 loan due within 120 days, bearing an interest rate of 11.25% with an additional bonus payment in the amount of 5% of the principal.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

On July 23, 2009, the Company accepted the resignation of B. Joseph Vincent from the Board of Directors. Mr. Vincent has been named chair emeritus and chief strategist of the Company and will focus on strategy and core competency merger and acquisition development.

Also on July 23, 2009, Mr. Gerald Garcia, Jr., was named Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Garcia resigned as President but remains as Chief Executive Officer with a mandate to strengthen technologies, management systems, planning, reporting, and compliance along with executive leadership and organizational development.

Effective July 23, 2009, Mr. Thomas W. Cady, a director of the Company, was appointed to serve as the new President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Cady focuses on operations, operational efficiency, assimilation, cross-core competency company leverage, quality, and growth.

The following table sets forth the name, age, position and office term of each executive officer and director of the Company.

Name

Age

Position

Since

B. Joseph Vincent

Chairman

2002

Gerald Garcia Jr.

6566

Chief Executive Officer and ~~President~~Chairman

2002

Patrick J. Summers

5354

Chief Financial Officer and Recording Secretary

2003

Thomas W. Cady

5455

~~Director~~Chief Operating Officer and President

2007

Theodore L. Innes

5960

Director

2007

Herbert I. London

7071

Director

2007

Following is a summary of the business experience of our officers and directors:

Gerald Garcia Jr., ~~CEO~~Chairman and ~~President~~CEO. Mr. Garcia has been ~~President~~with ~~and CEO of~~ AIMS since inception in October 7, 2002. In December of 2000, Mr. Garcia became Chief Operating Officer of Gregory Welteroth Advertising in Montoursville, Pennsylvania, and served as President of that company since June of 2001. Previously, Mr. Garcia was editor of the San Bernardino County Sun newspaper from September 1999 to May 2000. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Garcia served as President and CEO of Heartland Capital Corp. in McLean, Virginia. Mr. Garcia has more than 3540 years experience in advertising and newspaper publishing and has worked in various capacities for several newspapers including the Houston Post, the Los Angeles Daily News, the Kansas City Star and the Knoxville Journal. In 2005 Mr. Garcia was honored by National Association of Hispanic Journalists, of which he was a founder and the founding president, by induction into the NAHJ Hall of Fame.

B. Joseph Vincent, Chairman and Secretary. Mr. Vincent has been an officer and director of AIMS since inception on October 7, 2002. Since 1996, Mr. Vincent has been self employed as a business STRATEGIST for several major corporations including St. Joe Company/Arvida, Firehouse Subs, and Founder Service Corporation, and currently serves on the Boards of Directors of several companies including Integrated Power Group, Ltd., The Ozone Group, Inc., and Acacia Historical Arts, Inc. Prior, Mr. Vincent was a founder, director, and chief operating officer of Businesship International, Inc., and from 1979 to 1990 was President and COO of The Communications Group. He has served as an executive with Control Data Corporation (NYSE), Recognition Equipment, Inc. (NASDAQ), and Visual Graphics Corporations (AMEX).17

16Thomas W. Cady, President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Cady, a senior executive with an extensive background in the information technology industry, currently serves as President and Chief Operating Officer of AIMS Worldwide, Inc., and Chairman of AIMS Interactive. He has in-depth general management experience, with expertise in marketing and sales leadership developed over twenty-seven years in both corporate and entrepreneurial environments. His career began with a strong foundation built at Xerox and IBM, where he continuously progressed through positions of increased responsibility in sales, marketing and general management. More recently, Mr. Cady spent several years in the broadband communications industry, serving as Chief Marketing Officer for XO Communications and Adelphia Communications, President, XO Business Services, President/ COO & co-founder of BroadStreet Communications, and President & CEO of two early stage software companies focused on broadband service providers. Mr. Cady holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Virginia Tech and an MBA from the University of Richmond.

Patrick J. Summers, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Summers has been the Controller and Chief Financial Officer of AIMS since 2003. Since 1994, Mr. Summers has been an independent consultant, focusing his practice on strategic planning and financial management. From 1998 to 2000 he was also the Controller and CFO for News USA, Inc., a privately owned public relations and publicity firm. He also worked for several nonprofits, including a Capitol Hill consumer advocacy organization where he was responsible for generating over 90% of the revenue. Mr. Summers holds an M.S. degree in Management Science from Louisiana State University.

Thomas W. Cady. Mr. Cady, a senior executive with an extensive background in the information technology industry, currently serves as the Chairman of AIMS Interactive and works with various technology companies on their product, market, distribution and funding initiatives. He has in-depth general management experience, with expertise in marketing and sales leadership developed over twenty-seven years in both corporate and entrepreneurial environments. His career began with a strong foundation built at Xerox and IBM, where he continuously progressed through positions of increased responsibility in sales, marketing and general management. More recently, Mr. Cady spent several years in the broadband communications industry, serving as Chief Marketing Officer for XO Communications and Adelphia Communications, President/ COO & co-founder of BroadStreet Communications, and President & CEO of two early stage software companies focused on broadband service providers. Mr. Cady holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Virginia Tech and an MBA from the University of Richmond.

Theodore L. Innes. Mr. Innes recently served as SVP and Chief Marketing Officer of Movie Gallery, Inc., a $2.3 billion 4,800 store international retail movie rental chain consisting of the Movie Gallery and Hollywood Video brands. Public company listed on NASDAQ. There he led all marketing activities for Movie Gallery, Hollywood Video, Game Crazy and MovieBeam to drive store revenue while providing strategic marketing direction for the company, including brand management, creative, website development, media planning, in store merchandising and operations guidance. He participated on the Senior Management Executive Committee. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and COO for the Neighborhood Marketing Institute, a premier strategic neighborhood marketing consulting firm specializing in the foodservice, hospitality, and retail industries with over $3 million in consulting fees. From 1991 to 1997 Mr. Innes was the Vice President and Marketing and Media for Blockbuster Entertainment Group, a $4 billion, 6,000 store company and franchised video rental, retail, and music chain with international locations where he was responsible for directing the Strategic Marketing and Media Planning activities for domestic video and music stores, including management of the $175 million advertising budget. Mr. Innes holds a degree in accounting from the University of Kentucky, is a Certified Public Accountant, and is a Certified Management Accountant. He is a member of the Association of National Advertisers, and a Retail Advisory Board member for the Digital Entertainment Group.

Herbert I. London. Mr. London has served as president of the Hudson Institute, a world-renowned think-tank in Washington, DC, since 1997. He is professor emeritus and the former John M. Olin Professor of Humanities at New York University. He was responsible for creating the Gallatin School of Individualized Study in 1972 and was its dean until 1992. This school was organized to promote the study of "great books" and classic texts. Mr. London is a graduate of Columbia University, 1960, and the recipient of a Ph.D. from New York University, 1966.

Mr. London currently sits on the Hudson Institute Board of Directors; the Board of Directors of the National Chamber Foundation; the Board of Directors of the International Transportation Systems; the Board of Trustees for Merrill Lynch Assets Management, the Board of Advisors for Cerego, the Board of Directors for InnoCentive and Reflex Security Inc., the Board of Directors for the American Jewish Congress; the Board of Advisors for Grantham University; the Board of Directors for Vigilant Research; the Board of Directors of the Coalition for a Secure Driver’s License; the Board of Directors of the National Association for Industry-Education Cooperation, the Board of Trustees of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, the Board of Advisors of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Inc., the Editorial Advisory Board for the Texas Education Review, and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, New York City Cultural Affairs Commission, American History and Civics Advisory Board, and the International Institute of Strategic Studies.

Mr. London served on the Board of Governors at St. John's College and the Board of Overseers at the Center for Naval Analyses. He is an affiliated professor at the University of Haifa in Israel and also Vice Chair of the American Jewish Congress - Council for World Jewry; he is also a member of the Union League Club.

All officers hold their positions at the will of the Board of Directors. All directors hold their positions for one year or until their successors are elected and qualified.

17During 2009 the Board has the following committees:

During 2008, with the 2007 addition of Mr. Cady, Mr. Innes, and Mr. London to the Board of Directors, the Board organized the following committees:

Governance Committee - Herbert London, Chairman

Compensation Committee - Thomas Cady, Chairman

Audit Committee - Theodore Innes, Chairman

Information Technology - Thomas Cady, Chairman

Human Resources Committee - Thomas Cady, Chairman

~~As of December 31, 2008, the Company had Theodore Innes as the Audit Committee Chairman and designated financial expert for this role.~~18

Compliance with Section 16

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires officers and directors of the Company and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of its equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in their ownership on Forms 3, 4, and 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and forward copies of such filings to the Company. Based on the copies of filings received by the Company during the most recent fiscal year the directors, officers, and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of the equity securities of the Company registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act have filed on a timely basis all required Forms 3, 4, and 5 and any amendments thereto.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Executive compensation for the previous two years is as follows:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Summary Compensation Table for 2008 and 2007
Summary Compensation Table for 2009 and 2008
							Change in
							Pension
						Non-Equity	Value and
				Stock	Option	Incentive	Nonqualified
Name and						Plan	Deferred	All Other
Principal		Salary	Bonus	Awards	Awards	Compensation	Compensation	Compensation	Total
Position	Year	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	Earnings ($)	($)	($)
(a)	(b)	( c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
B. Joseph Vincent	~~2008~~2009	~~157~~30,~~171~~000	-	-	-	-	-	-	~~157~~30,~~171~~000
Chairman	2007	196,137	-	-	-	-	-	-	196,137
Chairman (former)	2008	157,171	-	-	-	-	-	-	157,171
Gerald Garcia, Jr.	~~2008~~2009	~~130~~22,~~000~~500	-	-	-	-	-	-	~~130~~22,~~000~~500
Principal Executive	~~2007~~2008	~~181~~130,~~489~~000	-	-	-	-	-	-	~~181~~130,~~489~~000
Officer
Michael L. Foudy	2008	-	-	-	-	-	-
Patrick J. Summers	2009	75,000	-	-	-	-	-	-	75,000
Former Director	2007	-	-	-	-	-	-	8,750	8,750
Principal Financial	2008	100,000	-	-	-	-	-	-	100,000
Patrick J. Summers	2008	100,000	-	-	-	-	-	-	100,000
Principal Financial	2007	100,393	-	-	-	-	-	-	100,393
Officer
Thomas W. Cady	2009	-0-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-0-
Principal Operating	2008	N/A	-	-	-	-	-	-	N/A
Officer
(i)Consulting fees.

	Outstanding Equity Awards At December 31, 2008								Equity
									Incentive
									Plan
								Equity	Plan
								Incentive	Awards:
								Plan	Market
			Equity			Number	Market	Plan	or Payout
			Incentive			of	Value of	Awards:	Value of
			Plan			Shares	Shares	Number of	Unearned
			Awards:			or Units	or Units	Unearned	Shares,
	Number of	Number of	Number of			of Stock	of Stock	Shares,	Units
	Securities	Securities	Securities			That	That	Units or	or Other
	Underlying	Underlying	Underlying			Have	Have	Other	Rights
	Unexercised	Unexercised	Unexercised	Option	Option	Not	Not	Rights That	That
	Options (#)	Options (#)	Unearned	Exercise	Expiration	Vested	Vested	Have Not	Have Not
	Exercisable	Unexercisable	Options (#)	Price ($)	Date	(#)	($)	Vested (#)	Vested ($)
(a)	(b)	( c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
Joseph Vincent	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2009	-	-	-	-
Chairman	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2009
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2011
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2010
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2011
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2013
Gerald Garcia	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2009	-	-	-	-
Principal	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2009
Executive	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
Officer	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2011
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2010
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2011
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2013
Michael Foudy	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2009	-	-	-	-
Former Director	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2009
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2011
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2010
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2011
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2013
Patrick Summers	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2009	-	-	-	-
Principal	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2009
Financial	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
Officer	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2011
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2012
	24,000	-	-	$ 0.50	11/16/2009
(e) Option exercise price for each 200,000 share grant is 125% of the average market price for the five days preceding the exercise of the options.
(e) Option exercise price for each 500,000 share grant is 110% of the average market price for the five days preceding the exercise of the options.

Director Compensation For 2008
Outstanding Equity Awards At December 31, 2009									Equity
					Change in
									Incentive
					Pension Value
									Plan
					and
								Equity	Plan
	Fees				Nonqualified
								Incentive	Awards:
	Earned			Non-Equity	Deferred
								Plan	Market
	or Paid	Stock	Option	Incentive Plan	Compensation	All Other
			Equity			Number	Market	Plan	or Payout
	in Cash	Awards	Awards	Compensation	Earnings	Compensation	Total
			Incentive			of	Value of	Awards:	Value of
Name	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)
			Plan			Shares	Shares	Number of	Unearned
(a)	(b)	( c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)
			Awards:			or Units	or Units	Unearned	Shares,
Gerald Garcia, Jr. (1)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Number of	Number of	Number of			of Stock	of Stock	Shares,	Units
B. Joseph Vincent (1)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Securities	Securities	Securities			That	That	Units or	or Other
Thomas W. Cady	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Underlying	Underlying	Underlying			Have	Have	Other	Rights
Theodore L. Innes	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Unexercised	Unexercised	Unexercised	Option	Option	Not	Not	Rights That	That
Herbert I. London	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Options (#)	Options (#)	Unearned	Exercise	Expiration	Vested	Vested	Have Not	Have Not
(1) No compensation is provided other than reported on Executive Compensation table.
	Exercisable	Unexercisable	Options (#)	Price ($)	Date	(#)	($)	Vested (#)	Vested ($)
(a)	(b)	( c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
Joseph Vincent	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010	-	-	-	-
Chairman (former)	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2011
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2010
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2011
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2013
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2014
Gerald Garcia	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010	-	-	-	-
Principal	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
Executive	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
Officer	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2011
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2010
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2011
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2013
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2014

~~We have not established any pension, profit sharing or insurance programs for the benefit of our employees.~~20


Michael Foudy	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010	-	-	-	-
Former Director	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2011
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2010
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2011
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2012
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2013
	500,000	-	-	$ -	5/31/2014

Patrick Summers	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010	-	-	-	-
Principal	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
Financial	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2010
Officer	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2011
	200,000	-	-	$ -	12/11/2012

Thomas W. Cady	100,000			$0.352	6/26/14
Principal Operating	50,000			$1.00	9/26/12
Officer

(e) Option exercise price for each 200,000 share grant is 125% of the average market price for the five days preceding the exercise of the options.
(e) Option exercise price for each 500,000 share grant is 110% of the average market price for the five days preceding the exercise of the options.


Director Compensation For 2009
					Change in
					Pension Value
					and
	Fees				Nonqualified
	Earned			Non-Equity	Deferred
	or Paid	Stock	Option	Incentive Plan	Compensation	All Other
	in Cash	Awards	Awards	Compensation	Earnings	Compensation	Total
Name	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)	($)

(a)	(b)	( c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)

Gerald Garcia, Jr. (1)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

B. Joseph Vincent (1)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Thomas W. Cady	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Theodore L. Innes	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Herbert I. London	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

(1) No compensation is provided other than reported on Executive Compensation table.

We have not established any pension, profit sharing, or insurance programs for the benefit of our employees.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth as of December 31, ~~2008~~2009, the name and shareholdings of each person who is an officer or is known to us that either directly or beneficially (includes options and warrants) holds more than 5% of our 5257,~~131~~683,~~279~~499 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $.001. The table also lists the name and shareholdings of each director and of all officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.

20# of Shares

		# of Shares
Name	Title of Class	Beneficially Owned	% of Shares
B. Joseph Vincent (1)(3)	Common	5,900,000	9%
10400 Eaton Place, #203
Fairfax, VA 22030
Gerald Garcia, Jr. (1)(3)	Common	5,008,567	8%
10400 Eaton Place, #203
Fairfax, VA 22030
Patrick J. Summers (1)	Common	1,165,500	2%
10400 Eaton Place, #203
Fairfax, VA 22030
Michael Foudy (2)	Common	6,794,022	10%
1600 North Oak Street, #1015
Arlington, VA 22209
Thomas W. Cady (1)	Common	1,630,000	3%
5308 Wriley Road
Bethesda, MD 20816
Theodore L. Innes (1)	Common	-	0%
Post Office Box 1963
2323 Lakeshore Drive
Mt. Dora, FL 32757
Herbert I. London (1)	Common	24,216	0%
10 West Street #20-E
New York City, NY 10004
Charles H. Brunie	Common	5,142,857	8%
21 Elm Rock Road
Bronxville, NY 10708
Liberty Growth Fund (3)	Preferred	48,812,500	43%
19415 Deerfield Dr., #204	and Common
Lansdowne, VA 20176
Lerota Capital (4)	Common	4,156,250	6%
1364 Beverly Road, #302
McLean, VA 22101
FG Investment Holdings, LLC	Preferred	6,468,750	9%
Attn.: James Gregory	and Common
Gregory and Plotkin, LLC
1331 Seventeenth Street, #1060
Denver, Co 80202
Officer and Directors	Common	13,728,283	19%
as a group (6 people)

Name

Title of Class

Beneficially Owned

% of Shares

Gerald Garcia, Jr. (1)(3)

Common

8,558,567

12%

10400 Eaton Place, #203

Fairfax, VA 22030

Patrick J. Summers (1)

Common

1,291,500

10400 Eaton Place, #203

Fairfax, VA 22030

Thomas W. Cady (1)

Common

2,700,000

5308 Wriley Road

Bethesda, MD 20816

Theodore L. Innes (1)

Common

Post Office Box 1963

2323 Lakeshore Drive

Mt. Dora, FL 32757

Herbert I. London (1)

Common

90,816

10 West Street #20-E

New York City, NY 10004

B. Joseph Vincent

Common

3,500,000

10400 Eaton Place, #203

Fairfax, VA 22030

Michael Foudy (2)

Common

5,181,856

1600 North Oak Street, #1015

Arlington, VA 22209

Charles H. Brunie

Common

5,142,857

21 Elm Rock Road

Bronxville, NY 10708

Liberty Growth Fund (3)

Preferred

48,812,500

46%

19415 Deerfield Dr., #204

and Common

Lansdowne, VA 20176

FG Investment Holdings, LLC

Common

970,619

Attn.: James Gregory

Gregory and Plotkin, LLC

1331 Seventeenth Street, #1060

Denver, Co 80202

Officer and Directors

Common

12,640,883

17%

as a group (5 people)

(1)

Officer and/or Director

(2)

Mr. Foudy’s shares are held by Gramercy Investments, LLC (31,~~644~~531,~~036~~870 shares) and ATB Productions, LLC (47,937 shares). Mr. Foudy is owner of Gramercy Investments, LLC. 102,049 shares are held in the name of Erin Maried Foudy Trust, Michael L. Foudy, Trustee

(3)

Includes 10,937,500 common shares available from conversion of preferred shares and 37,875,000 options available ~~after~~within 60 days.

(4)

4,156,250 in options.

The following breaks-down certain beneficial (individuals) owners listed above shares by ownership and options/warrants:

Mr. Vincent: Owns or controls ~~2,900,000~~-0- and holds 3,~~000~~500,000 in options or warrants

Mr./Ms. Garcia: ~~Owns~~Own or controls 25,008,567 shares and ~~holds~~hold 3,~~000~~550,000 in options or warrants

Mr. Summers: Owns or controls ~~141~~291,500 shares and 1,~~024~~000,000 in options or warrants

Mr. Foudy: Owns or controls 31,~~794~~681,~~022~~856 shares and 3,~~000~~500,000 in options or warrants

Mr. Cady: Owns or controls 12,~~630~~550,000 shares; no150,000 in options/warrants

Mr. Innes: Owns or controls no shares or warrants

Mr. London: Owns or controls 2490,~~216~~816 shares; no options/warrants

Mr. Brunie: Owns or controls 4,142,857 shares and 1,000,000 in options or warrants

Mr. Gregory & FG Investments: Own or control 281,269 shares and 220,000 in options or warrants

In ~~2008~~2009 ~~and~~we ~~2007,~~expensed ~~respectively,~~$50 weto ~~expensed~~the ~~consulting~~spouse ~~fees~~of ~~which~~an weofficer ~~paid~~for orservices. We ~~plan~~expensed to$171,248 ~~pay~~for inlegal ~~cash~~services ~~totaling~~provided ~~($55,000),~~by ~~which~~a ~~was~~company partially owned by a ~~credit~~shareholder; ~~taken~~half ~~against~~if the balance ~~due~~was paid in common stock converted at $.65 (65 cents) per share. We negotiated debt to ~~him~~another ~~from~~law ~~previous~~firm, ~~years~~owned by a shareholder, ~~and~~from $555,~~000,~~250 to ~~Director~~$10,000, ~~Thomas~~issuing ~~Cady~~150,000 ~~who~~common ~~acted~~shares inas ~~the~~part ~~capacity~~ of ~~consultant~~the settlement.

InAs ~~2008~~of ~~and~~December ~~2007 we accrued $-0- and $11~~31,~~250~~ ~~(to Mr. Max Miller~~2009, ~~Esq.)~~we inwere ~~additional~~indebted ~~legal fees~~ to a related party ~~shareholder~~Michael ~~acting~~Foudy in the ~~capacity~~form of ~~attorney;~~Accounts wePayable ~~continue to be indebted to the shareholder~~ in the amount of $5512,~~250 as of December 31, 2008~~464.

As of December 31, 2009, we were indebted to the following related parties (or persons who at the time of the debt transaction were related parties) in the, form of current liabilities, in the following amounts, which include principal and interest:

Gerald and/or Christine Garcia*

$155,867

Thomas W. Cady*

62,500

Thomas W. Cady

303,282

Charles H. Brunie**

248,452

Michael L. Foudy, as ATB debtholder

930,462

Media Partners, as ATB debtholder

280,877

Max E. Miller, as ATB debtholder

224,022

Dennison E. Smith, as ATB debtholder

449,135

---------------

$2,654,597

* Ms. Garcia's and Mr. Cady's Promissory Notes bear no interest.

** On March 10, 2009, shareholder Charles Brunie lent the Company $200,000 due in 90 days or within fifteen days after the Company receives additional funding, bearing an interest rate of 2 1/2 percent per month.

In 2008 we expensed consulting fees which we paid or plan to pay in cash totaling ($55,000), which was a credit taken against the balance due to him from previous years

In 2008, we expensed consulting fees which we paid or plan to pay in cash totaling $144,063 to eight individual shareholders, none of whom was officers or directors:

Christine Garcia	$	300
Global Equity Society / Rudy Lamers		750
GMMJ Partners (CREDIT)*		(38,304)
Gregory & Plotkin / James D. Gregory**		9,767
Liebeck Morris / Chris Petersen		31,050
James D. Lyke		3,000
Denison E. Smith		128,500
Stevens GouldPincus / Arthur Stevens		9,000
	$	144,063

Christine Garcia

$300

Global Equity Society / Rudy Lamers

750

GMMJ Partners (CREDIT) *

(38,304)

Gregory & Plotkin / James D. Gregory **

9,767

Liebeck Morris / Chris Petersen

31,050

James D. Lyke

3,000

Denison E. Smith

128,500

Stevens GouldPincus / Arthur Stevens

9,000

$144,063

* During 2008 GMMJ Partners took a credit against amounts owed from previous fiscal years.

** In addition to cash payment for his services Mr. Gregory received 7,488 shares of AIMS Worldwide, Inc., restricted common stock.

As of December 31, 2008, AIMS Corporate was indebted to related parties in the form of Accounts Payable (related parties at the time the payables were posted) in the amount of $80,250:

Max Miller, PC	$	55,250
Media Partners		25,000
	$	80,250

Max Miller, PC

$55,250

Media Partners

25,000

$80,250

As of December 31, 2008, we were indebted to related party Christine Garcia in the form of a promissory note, bearing no interest, in the amount of $70,000.

As of December 31, 2008, ATB Media, Inc., was indebted to related parties in amounts as follows:

Accounts Payable	$	12,464
Long-term Debt Principal		975,971
Long-term Debt Interest		906,711
	$	1,895,146

Accounts Payable

22$12,464

InLong-term ~~2004,~~Debt we acquired a company under common control, ATB Media, Inc. (“ATB”). ATB was formed in 1997 in Delaware to participate in the acquisition and operation of radio and television stations. Prior to the acquisition, ATB had advanced $1,010,573 to entities acquiring certain of these radio stations. In addition, ATB had acquired a $201,659 interest in Group One Broadcasting, Inc. Because of uncertainty in recovering these investments, management has written them off/reserved against them.Principal

~~ATB Media~~975, ~~Inc., unsecured notes payable, due on demand, and related accrued interest to related parties as of December 31, 2008, follow:~~971

		December 31, 2008
		Balance		Balance
		Principal		Interest
Denison Smith*, 12% interest	$	248,712	$	200,424
* related party prior to 2007
Gerald Garcia, Jr., 10% interest		30,000		39,000
Max Miller, 15% interest on fee only		125,000		99,022
Media Partners, 6.5%		164,515		99,955
Michael Foudy, -0-% interest		125,000		-
Michael Foudy, 15% interest, excl. fee		282,744		468,310
Total	$	975,971	$	906,711

Long-term Debt Interest

906,711

$1,895,146

Unsecured notes payable due to ATB Media, Inc., indebtedness, due on demand, and related accrued interest to related parties as of December 31, 2008, follow:

December 31, 2008

Balance

Principal

Interest

Denison Smith*, 12% interest

$248,712

$200,424

* related party prior to 2007

Gerald Garcia, Jr., 10% interest

30,000

39,000

Max Miller, 15% interest on fee only

125,000

99,022

Media Partners, 6.5%

164,515

99,955

Michael Foudy, -0-% interest

125,000

Michael Foudy, 15% interest, excl. fee

282,744

468,310

Total

$975,971

$906,711

In 2008 we renegotiated and terminated our license agreement with GMMJ Partners.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Audit Fee

The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of AIMS’ annual financial statement and review of financial statements included in AIMS’ 10-KSB reports and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $7279,~~063~~079 for fiscal year ended ~~2007~~2009 and $78,490 for fiscal year ended 2008.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of AIMS financial statements that are not reported above were $326,~~295~~160 for fiscal year ended ~~2007~~2009 and $31,740 for fiscal year ended 2008.

Tax Fees

There were no fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for the fiscal years ~~2007~~2009 and 2008.

All Other Fees

There were no other aggregate fees billed in either of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported above.

As of December 31, ~~2008~~2009, we had established an Audit Committee. Independent Board member Mr. Theodore Innes serves as chairman. Our Audit Committee and our Board of Directors will evaluate and approve in advance, the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before the auditor renders audit and non-audit services. We do not rely on pre-approval policies and procedures.

2325

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller which was attached as Exhibit 99.3 to its 2002 Form 10KSB. The Company will provide, at no cost, a copy of the Code of Ethics to any shareholder of the Company upon receiving a written request sent to the Company’s address shown on Page 1 of this report.


Exhibit #	Description	Location

Exhibit 3(I)	Articles of Incorporation as Amended	*

Exhibit 3(ii)	Bylaws	*

Exhibit 14	Code of Ethics	**

Exhibit 31.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
	pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Attached

Exhibit 31.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
	pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Attached

Exhibit 32.1	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
	pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
	Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***	Attached

Exhibit 32.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
	pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
	Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***	Attached

* Incorporated by reference. Filed as exhibit to SB-2 filed September 8, 1999

**Incorporated by reference. Filed as exhibit to 2002 10KSB filed March 4, 2003

***The Exhibit attached to this Form 10-KSB shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") or otherwise subject to liability under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

2426

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

AIMS Worldwide, Inc.

/s/ Gerald Garcia Jr.

Gerald Garcia Jr., Chief Executive Officer

~~March~~April 3115, ~~2009~~2010

/s/ Patrick J. Summers

Patrick J. Summers, Chief Financial Officer

~~March~~April 3115, ~~2009~~2010

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ B. Joseph Vincent

B. Joseph Vincent, Chairman

March 31, 2009

/s/ Gerald Garcia, Jr.

Gerald Garcia, Jr., ~~Director~~Chairman

~~March~~April 3115, ~~2009~~2010

25/s/ Tomas W. Cady

Thomas W. Cady, President & Chief Operating Officer, April 15, 2010

AIMS WORLDWIDE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting firm	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008	F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2009	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended Dec. 31, 2008 and 2007	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended Dec. 31, 2009 and 2008	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the period
from Jan. 1, 2007, through Dec. 31 2008	F-5
from Jan. 1, 2008 through Dec. 31 2009	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended Dec. 31, 2008 and 2007	F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended Dec. 31, 2009 and 2008	F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-87

F-1

Turner, Jones & Associates, P.L.L.C.

Certified Public Accountants

108 Center Street, North, 2^nd Floor

Vienna, Virginia 22180-5712

(703) 242-6500

FAX (703) 242-1600

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of:

AIMS Worldwide, Inc., and Subsidiaries

10400 Eaton Place, Suite 203

Fairfax, Virginia 22030

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AIMS Worldwide, Inc. (a Nevada Incorporation) as of December 31, ~~2008 and 2007~~2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for ~~each of~~ the ~~two~~periods ~~years~~ending inDecember ~~the~~31, ~~period~~2009 ~~ended~~and December 31, 2008 (as restated). These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AIMS Worldwide and Subsidiaries as of December 31, ~~2008 and 2007~~2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for ~~each of~~ the ~~two~~periods ~~years~~ending inDecember ~~the~~31, ~~period~~2009 ~~ended~~and December 31, 2008 (as restated), in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements, the Company has reclassified goodwill to intangible assets subject to amortization and recognized impairment. Accordingly, the 2008 financial statements have been restated and an adjustment has been made to retained earnings as of January 1, 2009.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the footnotes, conditions exist that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Turner, Jones & Associates, PLLC

Vienna, Virginia

~~March~~April 3013, ~~2009~~2010

F-2

AIMS Worldwide, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheet

December 31, ~~2008~~2009

Assets
Current assets
Cash	$	~~145~~272,~~440~~064
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $204,263		363,692
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $43,035		645,912
Loan from employee Inventory		76,500 6,324
Loan from employee Deferred billings		75,200 114,918
Prepaid expense		5368,~~950~~152
Total current assets		~~597~~1,~~906~~476,246
Property and equipment
At cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $67,674		155,298
At cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $119,920		76,733
Other assets
Deposits		1223,~~249~~842
Other assets		78,722
Deferred expense		185,400
Prepaid offering costs		402,064
Prepaid software costs Goodwill, net of impairment of $1,549,580		112,000 554,637
Prepaid software costs Goodwill, net of impairment of $87,431		112,000 3,908,755
Intangible assets, net of amortization of $3,693,086		1,280,480
Intangible assets, net of amortization of $680,625		1,540,413
Total assets	$	3,709,338
Total assets	$	6,807,406
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	~~468~~1,~~488~~146,811
Accounts payable - related parties		9212,~~714~~464
Accrued expenses Deferred revenue		96142,~~316~~695 23307,~~234~~843
Current portion of long-term notes payable Notes payable		354,104 1,633,659
Notes payable Notes payable - related parties		2,394,098 1,166,705
Notes payable - related parties		1,045,971
Brandstand debt		220,664
Accrued interest payable		1,123,506
Brandstand debt - related parties		314,538
Accrued interest payable - related parties		906,711
Accrued interest payable		1,296,455
Total current liabilities		5,744,702
Accrued interest payable - related parties		926,061
Long term notes payable		221,362
Total current liabilities		7,928,334
Total liabilities		5,966,064
Long term notes payable		185,196
Minority interest		(235,734)
Total liabilities		8,113,530
Minority interest		(146,420)
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares		7,194
authorized, 7,193,750 shares issued and outstanding including shares in escrow		-
authorized, 7,193,750 shares issued and outstanding, including shares in escrow
Additional paid-in capital		3,638,835
Common stock, $.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares		5257,~~131~~684
authorized, 52,131,279 shares issued and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital		11,~~176~~821,~~593~~711
Stock subscriptions receivable		(~~252~~26,~~500~~000)
Accumulated deficit		(1319,~~545~~757,~~178~~196)
Total stockholders' equity		1(4,~~077~~257,~~075~~772)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	63,~~807~~709,~~406~~338

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-3

AIMS Worldwide, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

		Year ended		Year ended
		Dec. 31, 2008		Dec. 31, 2007
Revenue	$	13,963,060	$	2,119,459
Operating expenses
Cost of sales		9,383,824		67,107
General and administrative expenses		5,073,303		4,657,611
General and administrative expenses - related parties		-		4,565
Depreciation and amortization, and impairment		393,807		352,415
Total operating expenses		14,850,934		5,081,698
Operating loss		(887,874)		(2,962,239)
Interest expense, net		(355,031)		(228,297)
Interest expense, net - related parties		(61,510)		(80,260)
Minority interest		29,907		113,977
Loss before discontinued operations and
provision for income taxes		(1,274,507)		(3,156,819)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		-		(4,973)
Loss from discontinued operations
net of income taxes		-		(27,878)
Loss before provision for income taxes		(1,274,507)		(3,189,670)
Income taxes		-		-
Net loss	$	(1,274,507)	$	(3,189,670)
Net loss available to common shareholders after beneficial conversion feature	$	(1,274,507)	$	(5,689,670)
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations	$	(0.03)	$	(0.08)
Basic and diluted loss per share to common shareholders	$	(0.03)	$	(0.15)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		43,718,612		39,027,790

(As restated)


		Year ended		Year ended
		Dec. 31, 2009		Dec. 31, 2008

Revenue	$	5,726,003	$	13,963,060

Operating expenses
Cost of sales		1,974,086		9,383,824
General and administrative expenses		4,631,032		5,073,303
Depreciation and amortization		565,381		611,155
Total operating expenses		7,293,817		15,068,282

Operating loss		(1,567,814)		(1,105,222)

Interest expense, net		(422,223)		(355,031)
Interest expense, net - related parties		(61,342)		(61,510)
Minority interest		(89,314)		29,907

Loss before discontinued operations and
provision for income taxes		(2,140,693)		(1,491,856)

Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes		-		-
Loss from discontinued operations
net of income taxes		-		-

Loss before provision for income taxes		(2,140,693)		(1,491,856)
Income taxes		-		-

Net loss	$	(2,140,693)	$	(1,491,856)
Net loss available to common shareholders after beneficial conversion feature	$	(2,140,693)	$	(1,491,856)
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations	$	(0.04)	$	(0.03)
Basic and diluted loss per share to common shareholders	$	(0.04)	$	(0.03)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		54,527,346		43,718,612

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-4

AIMS Worldwide, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

	Pref Shares	Pref Shares	Pref Shares	Common Sh	Common Sh	Common Sh	Common Sh	Common Sh
			Addl.			Addl.	Stock	Held
		Par	Paid-in		Par	Paid-in	Subscr.	In	Deficit
	Shares	Value	Capital	Shares	Value	Capital	Rec'vble	Escrow	Retained	Total$$
Balance, December 31, 2006	-	$ -	$ -	40,044,248	$ 40,044	$9,011,069	$ (50,000)	$(1,735,000)	$ (9,081,001)	$(1,814,888)
Balance, December 31, 2007	7,100,000	$7,100	$3,488,929	44,586,575	$44,587	$9,920,486	$(50,000)	$ -	$(16,124,647)	$(2,713,545)
Common stock issued for cash	-	-	-	2,490,000	$ 2,490	$ 522,510	-	-	-	$ 525,000
(As restated)
Common stock issued for services	-	--	-	676,827	$ 677	$ 289,775	-	-	-	$ 290,452
Common stock issued for
Options issued for offering costs	-	-	-	-	-	$ 402,064	-	-	-	$ 402,064
cash	-	-	-	6,161,111	6,161	1,055,113	(202,500)	-	-	858,774
Preferred stock issued for
cash	93,750	94	149,906	-	-	-	-	-	-	150,000
Common stock issued
for debt	-	-	-	100,000	$ 100	$ 22,900	-	-	-	$ 23,000
for services, including
Preferred stock issued to fund acquisitions less offering costs of $3,971	7,100,000	$ 7,100	$3,488,929	-	-	-	-	-	-	$ 3,496,029
campaign media buying
Return of shares to
participants	-	-	-	1,383,593	1,384	200,994	-	-	-	202,378
authorized	-	-	-	(200,000)	$ (200)	$(117,800)	-	-	-	$ (118,000)
Net loss for year	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	(1,491,856)	(1,491,856)
Common stock issued for acquisitions, less offering costs of $158,000*	-	-	-	1,475,500	$ 1,476	$(210,032)	-	$ 1,735,000	-	$ 1,526,444
Balance, December 31, 2008	7,193,750	$7,194	$3,638,835	52,131,279	$52,131	$11,176,593	$(252,500)	$ -	$(17,616,503)	$(2,994,250)
Net loss for year	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$ (3,189,670)	$(3,189,670)
(As restated)
Balance, December 31, 2007	7,100,000	$7,100	$3,488,929	44,586,575	$ 44,587	$9,920,486	$(50,000)	$ -	$(12,270,671)	$ 1,140,431

* and repricing of shares placed in escrow in 2006 in the amount of $712,889

F-5

	Pref Shares	Pref Shares	Pref Shares	~~Com Shares~~Common	~~Com Shares~~Common	~~Com Shares~~Common	~~Com Shares~~Common	~~Com Shares~~Common
			Addl.			Addl.	Stock	Held
		Par	Paid-in		Par	Paid-in	Subscr.	In	Deficit
	Shares	Value	Capital	Shares	Value	Capital	Rec'vble	Escrow	Retained	Total$$
Balance, December 31, 2007	7,100,000	$ 7,100	$3,488,929	44,586,575	$ 44,587	$ ,920,486	$ (50,000)	$ -	$(12,270,671)	$ 1,140,431
Balance, December 31, 2008	7,193,750	$ 7,194	$3,638,835	52,131,279	$ 52,131	$11,176,593	$(252,500)	$ -	$(17,616,503)	$(2,994,250)
Common stock issued for cash				6,161,111	$ 6,161	$ 1,055,113	$(202,500)	-	-	$ 858,774
(As restated)
Preferred stock issued for cash	93,750	$ 94	$ 149,906					-	-	$ 150,000
Common stock issued for
Common stock issued for services, including campaign media buying participants	-	-	-	1,383,593	$ 1,384	$ 00,994	-	-	-	$ 202,378
cash	-	-	-	584,277	584	57,016	-	-	-	57,600
Net loss for year	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	$ (1,274,507)	$(1,274,507)
Common stock issued for
Balance, December 31, 2008	7,193,750	$ 7,194	$3,638,835	52,131,279	$52,131	$11,176,593	$(252,500)	$ -	$(13,545,178)	$ 1,077,075
acquisition	-	-	-	1,892,500	1,892	374,133	-	-	-	376,025
Common stock issued for
debt extinguishment	-	-	-	816,406	816	186,957	-	-	-	187,773
Common stock issued
for services	-	-	-	2,259,037	2,259	310,744	-	-	-	313,033
Subscription expiration	-	-	-	-	-	-	226,500	-	-	226,500
Warrants cancelled	-	-	-	-	-	(283,731)	-	-	-	(283,731)
Net loss for year	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	(2,140,693)	(2,140,693)
Balance, December 31, 2009	7,193,750	$ 7,194	$3,638,835	57,683,499	$ 57,684	$11,821,711	$ (26,000)	$ -	$(19,360,543)	$(4,257,772

F-6

AIMS Worldwide, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

		Year ended		Year ended
		Dec. 31, 2008		Dec. 31, 2007
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(1,274,507)	$	(3,189,670)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities
Depreciation, amortization, and impairment		393,807		352,414
Income from minority interest		(29,906)		(134,294)
Stock issued to employees and others for services		202,378		290,452
Changes in current assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable and other current assets		(216,066)		133,535
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		75,652		445,330
Net cash used in operating activities		(848,642)		(2,102,233)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of equipment Investment in software		(4,202) (112,000)		(35,535) -
Deposit on acquisition		-		(3,160,000)
Cash acquired on acquisition Sale of equity investments		- -		140,390 1,025,000
Net cash used in investing activities		(116,202)		(2,030,145)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from sale of common stock		867,299		525,000
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock		150,000		3,500,000
Offering costs for sale of common stock		(8,526)		(4,503)
Proceeds from notes payable		204,593		407,728
Repayments of notes payable		(241,676)		(174,196)
Net cash provided by financing activities		971,690		4,254,029
Net change in cash		6,847		(121,651)
Cash, beginning of year		138,593		16,942
Cash, end of year	$	145,440	$	138,593
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	89,612	$	27,729
Income Taxes	$	-	$	-
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Stock in escrow for acquisition IKON and Target America		-		(1,735,000)
Stock issued to complete acquisitions		-		662,865
Stock issued to settle debt		-		23,000

(As restated)


		Year ended		Year ended
		Dec. 31, 2009		Dec. 31, 2008
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(2,140,693)	$	(1,491,856)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		565,381		611,155
Income (loss) from minority interest		89,314		(29,906)
Stock issued to employees and others for services		313,003		202,378

Changes in current assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable and other current assets		(761,393)		(216,066)
Prepaid offering costs		402,064		-
Deferred billings		(114,918)		-
Inventory		6,324		-
Accounts payable and other current liabilities		1,121,539		75,652
Net cash used in operating activities		(519,379)		(848,642)

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of equipment, net Investment in software		10,547 -		(4,202) (112,000)
Net cash used in investing activities		10,547		(116,202)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from sale of common stock		57,600		867,300
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock		-		150,000
Offering costs for sale of common stock		-		(8,526)
Stock issued for acquisition		376,025		-
Stock issued for debt extinguishment		187,773		-
Acquisition costs		(1,012,047)		-
Notes payable, net		1,026,105		(37,083)
Net cash provided by financing activities		635,456		971,690

Net change in cash		126,624		6,847

Cash, beginning of year		145,440		138,593
				(As restated)
Cash, end of year	$	272,064	$	145,440

Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	53,706	$	89,612
Income Taxes	$	-	$	-

Stock issued to complete acquisitions	$	376,025	$	-
Stock issued to settle debt	$	187,773	$	-

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

F-7

AIMS WORLDWIDE, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Organization, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Description of Operations

AIMS Worldwide (AIMS™) is a vertically integrated marketing communications consultancy providing organizations with its AIMSolutions branded focused marketing solutions at the lowest possible cost. AIMS™ (Accurate Integrated Marketing Solutions) increases the accuracy of the strategic direction of its client's marketing program, improves results and reduces the cost, by refocusing "mass marketing" to a more strategic "One-2-One™" relationship with the ideal customer. To further differentiate from the rest of the market, AIMS™ places intense focus on the Return on Marketing Investment, or "ROMI™." The Company's goal is to provide clients with a measurable return by first conducting an audit of the client's existing marketing strategy in order to deliver an increased return on their investment. AIMS™ is accelerating its growth by targeting and acquiring a group of core competency media and marketing communications services companies.

We commenced operations in 2002. In 2005 we acquired certain assets of a company to acquire, design, construct and manage private cable and Internet systems. The acquired subsidiary company provides cable and Internet services to more than 3,000 households and resort rooms in premier master planned communities and major resorts in greater Orlando, Fla. Also in 2005, we acquired a company in the marketing development service industry. In 2006 we acquired Streetfighter Marketing, Inc., a strategy and planning organization in Gahanna, Ohio. In 2007 we acquired a food service consulting company d/b/a Bill Main and Associates, Target America, Inc., a digital marketing firm based in Fairfax, Va., and 55% of IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, a public affairs organization based in Arlington, Va., and Denver. Also, in 2007 we sold Prime Time Broadband, the company that resulted from the purchase of the cable operation assets. We are headquartered in Fairfax, Va. In June 2009 we acquires BrandStand Group, Inc., a food service industry consulting company based in Lewisberry, Penn.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AIMS Worldwide, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. When we refer to “we,” “our,” or “us” in this document, we mean AIMS Worldwide, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception and we have a net working capital deficiency at December 31, ~~2008~~2009. However, in the past we have raised sufficient capital to fund our on-going obligations through private debt and equity financing. We are currently seeking additional capital in order to proceed with our business plan. While we have been successful in the past in raising equity capital, the unique nature of our business concept has limited our ability to acquire additional financing. We believe that we are not a viable candidate for commercial bank debt financing due to our lack of operating history and our lack of tangible assets. There is no assurance that we will meet the objectives of our business plan or that we will be successful in obtaining additional financing. Because there is no guarantee that we will succeed in accomplishing our objectives, substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not contain any adjustments that may be required should we be unable to continue as an on-going concern.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principals requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities; disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements; and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-8

Reclassifications

Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the current-year presentation.

Cash and cash equivalents

For financial accounting purposes and the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. We had $~~145~~272,~~440~~064 in cash equivalents as of December 31, ~~2008~~2009.

F-8

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments consist of cash, receivables, and accounts payable and accrued expenses. The carrying values of cash, receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of their short maturities.

The carrying value of the term loans and demand note payable approximates fair value since the interest rate associated with the debt approximates the current market interest rate.

Accounts Receivable

A reserve for uncollectible accounts has been established in an amount of $~~204~~43,~~263~~035.43 at December 31, ~~2008~~2009. We review receivable accounts quarterly and adjust reserves as appropriate.

Accounts receivable consists of amounts due from customers located in the United States. The Company considers accounts more than 90 days old to be past due although special exceptions are made for certain clients at the discretion of only top management. The Company uses the allowance method for recognizing bad debts. When an account is deemed uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance. The Company generally does not require collateral for its accounts receivable. As of December 31, ~~2008~~2009, management believes the allowance for uncollectible accounts is fairly stated.

Inventory

Inventory, which consists of books and other materials for sale by Bill Main and Associates, is stated at the lower of cost or market, with costs determined using the average-cost method. The Company conducts a physical inventory annually and routinely reviews the inventory for any impairment either because of obsolescence or because the inventory exceeds by a material amount the forecasts for company requirements. The Company records a provision for obsolete or excess inventory whenever impairment has been identified.

Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses consist primarily of pre-payments of insurance, rent, maintenance, and trade deposits which will be reflected as an expense during the periods benefited.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally ranging from three to seven years. The recoverability of property and equipment is evaluated whenever indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount. No impairment charges have been recorded for the years ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” An asset is considered impaired if its carrying amount exceeds the future net cash flow the asset is expected to generate. If an asset is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value. We assess the recoverability of our long-lived and intangible assets by determining whether the unamortized balances can be recovered through undiscounted future net cash flows of the related assets. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on projected discounted future net cash flows. ~~Impairment charges have been recorded against Goodwill in the amounts of $-0- and $87,431 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.~~

F-9

Intangible assets

We have acquired intangible assets in conjunction with acquisitions. These assets have been originally stated at cost, subsequently reduced by amortization and impairment, if required. We have letters of intent related to the HWL acquisition that are being amortized over their four year expected life. In 2006, we acquired the Street Fighter brand, trademark, copyrights, published materials, and intellectual property as part of the Streetfighter acquisition that are being amortized over their expected ten year economic life. In 2007, we acquired non-compete restrictions, trademarks and trade secrets, software systems as part of the Bill Main and Target America acquisitions that will be amortized over their expected lives, and we acquired Goodwill as part of the IKON and Target America acquisitions.

F-9

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue policies meet the criteria for realizing and earning revenues set forth in SEC Staff Bulletin (“SAB”) 101 because, when applicable, we recognize revenue and earnings only when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) our vendor’s price is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.

Revenue for service fees is recognized at the time the service is performed. Revenue for product sales is recognized at the time the product is delivered. Advertising revenue is earned as the advertisements are aired or published. Revenue from speaking engagements is recognized when the speech is delivered.

In the second quarter of 2008 and in preparation for the national campaign season IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC ("IPAG"), undertook political issue, political referendum, and political interest group (527s) research. IPAG developed a unique media arbitrage strategy whereby advanced political issue media could be purchased, inventoried, and resold on behalf of interested clients. In the third quarter 2008 IPAG conducted campaign media buying and selling by entering into a business services relationship with RD Marketing, LLC, in Fort Collins, Colorado, whereby IPAG applied its strategic research and received capital with which we purchased and inventoried media product. Subsequently, we sold the inventory. Once the national election campaigns were completed RD Marketing received its original capital plus a small return from the campaign media buying activities and associated IPAG services.

Concentration of Credit Risk and Financial Instruments

SFAS No. 105, "Disclosure of Information About Financial Statements with Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Financial Instruments with Concentrations of High Risk," required disclosure of significant concentrations of credit risk regardless of the degree of such risk. Financial instruments with significant credit risk include cash. The Company deposits its cash with high quality financial institutions in amounts less than the federal insurance limit of $250,000 in order to limit credit risk. As of December 31, 2008, the Company's bank deposits did not exceed the insured limit.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily accounts receivable. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Company’s customer base.

Share-based Payment Arrangements

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-based payment, which requires that compensation related to all stock-based awards, including stock options and restricted common stock, be recognized in the financial statements based on their estimated grant-date fair value. The Company previously recorded stock compensation pursuant to the intrinsic value method under APB Opinion No. 25, whereby compensation was recorded related to performance share and unrestricted share awards and no compensation was recognized for most stock option awards. The Company is using the modified prospective application method of adopting SFAS No. 123R, whereby the estimated fair value of unvested stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 will be recognized as compensation expense in periods subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the same valuation method used in our prior pro forma disclosures. The Company has estimated expected forfeitures, as required by SFAS No. 123R, and is recognizing compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest. Compensation expense is amortized over the estimated service period, which is the shorter of the award’s time vesting period or the derived service period as implied by any accelerated vesting provisions when the common stock price reaches specified levels. All compensation must be recognized by the time the award vests. The cumulative effect of initially adopting SFAS No. 123R was immaterial.

F-10

Advertising Expenses

All advertising expenditures will be expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses for ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008 were $2518,~~546~~723 and $2725,~~944~~546, respectively.

Income Taxes

We report income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", which requires the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from the difference between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount on the financial statements. Deferred tax amounts are determined by using the tax rates expected to be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds received, as provided under currently enacted law. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. Income tax expense or benefit is the tax payable or refundable, respectively, for the period plus or minus the change during the period in the deferred tax assets and liabilities.

F-10

Earnings/(loss) Per Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing the net income available to common shareholders (the numerator) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. The computation of diluted earnings is similar to basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.

At December 31, ~~2008~~2009, there was no variance between basic and diluted loss per share as the exercise of outstanding warrants to purchase common stock would be potentially anti-dilutive.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in prior year's financial statements to conform to classifications used in the current year.

New Accounting Standards

InEffective ~~February~~July 1, ~~2006~~2009, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ~~Statement~~the ~~No.~~Financial ~~155,~~Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting ~~for~~Standards ~~Certain~~Codification ~~Hybrid~~(“ASC”) ~~Financial~~105-10, ~~Instruments”~~Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – Overall (“~~SFAS~~ASC No105-10”). ~~155~~ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”), ~~which~~as ~~amends~~the ~~FASB~~source ~~Statements~~of ~~No.~~authoritative ~~133~~accounting ~~and~~principles ~~140. SFAS~~recognized ~~No.~~by ~~155~~the ~~permits~~FASB ~~fair~~to ~~value~~be ~~re-measurement~~applied ~~for~~by ~~any~~nongovernmental ~~hybrid~~entities ~~financial~~in ~~instrument~~the ~~containing~~preparation anof ~~embedded~~financial ~~derivative~~statements ~~that~~in ~~would~~conformity ~~otherwise~~with ~~require~~U.S. ~~bifurcation,~~GAAP. Rules and ~~broadens~~interpretive areleases ~~Qualified~~of ~~Special~~the ~~Purpose~~SEC ~~Entity’s~~under ~~permitted~~authority ~~holdings~~of tofederal ~~include~~securities ~~passive~~laws ~~derivative~~are ~~financial~~also ~~instruments~~sources ~~that~~of ~~pertain~~authoritative toU.S. ~~other~~GAAP ~~derivative~~for ~~financial~~SEC ~~instruments~~registrants. ~~SFAS~~ ~~No.~~All ~~155~~guidance iscontained ~~effective~~in ~~for~~the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification superseded all ~~financial~~existing ~~instruments~~non-SEC ~~acquired~~accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, ~~issued~~non-SEC oraccounting ~~subject~~literature tonot aincluded rein the Codification is non-~~measurement~~authoritative. ~~event~~The ~~occurring~~FASB ~~after~~will not issue new standards in the ~~beginning~~form of anStatements, ~~entity’s~~FASB ~~first~~Staff ~~fiscal~~Positions ~~year~~or ~~beginning~~Emerging ~~after~~Issues ~~September~~Task ~~15,~~Force ~~2006~~Abstracts. ~~SFAS~~ ~~No.~~Instead, ~~155~~it ~~has~~will noissue ~~current~~Accounting ~~applicability~~Standards toUpdates ~~the~~(“ASUs”). ~~Company’s~~The ~~financial~~FASB ~~statements. Management~~will ~~adopted~~not ~~SFAS~~consider NoASUs as authoritative in their own right. ~~155~~ASUs onwill ~~January~~serve 1,only ~~2007~~to ~~and~~update the ~~initial~~Codification, ~~adoption~~provide ofbackground ~~this~~information ~~statement~~about ~~did~~the ~~not~~guidance ~~have~~and aprovide ~~material~~the ~~impact~~bases for conclusions on the ~~Company’~~change(s) ~~financial~~in ~~position,~~the ~~results~~Codification. ofReferences ~~operations,~~made orto ~~cash~~FASB ~~flows~~guidance throughout this document have been updated for the Codification.

InEffective ~~March~~January 1, ~~2006~~2008, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ~~SFAS~~FASB ~~No.~~ASC ~~156~~820-10, ~~“Accounting~~Fair ~~for~~Value ~~Servicing~~Measurements ofand ~~Financial~~Disclosures ~~Asset.”~~– Overall (“~~SFAS~~ASC ~~No. 156~~820-10”)~~. This~~ ~~Statement~~with ~~amends~~respect ~~SFAS~~to ~~No.~~its ~~140~~financial assets and ~~addresses~~liabilities. ~~the~~In ~~recognition~~February ~~and~~2008, ~~measurement~~the ofFASB ~~separately~~issued ~~recognized~~updated ~~servicing~~guidance ~~assets~~related ~~and~~to ~~liabilities,~~fair ~~such~~value asmeasurements, ~~those~~which ~~common~~is ~~with~~included ~~mortgage~~in ~~securitization~~the ~~activities,~~Codification ~~and~~in ~~provides~~ASC an820-10-55, ~~approach~~Fair toValue ~~simplify~~Measurements ~~efforts~~and toDisclosures ~~obtain~~– ~~hedge-like~~Overall ~~(offset)~~– ~~accounting~~Implementation byGuidance ~~permitting~~and aIllustrations. ~~servicer~~The ~~that~~updated ~~uses~~guidance ~~derivative~~provided ~~financial~~a ~~instruments~~one toyear ~~offset~~deferral ~~risks~~of onthe ~~servicing~~effective todate ~~report~~of ~~both~~ASC ~~the~~820-10 ~~derivative~~for non-financial ~~instrument~~assets and ~~related~~non-financial ~~servicing~~liabilities, ~~asset~~except orthose ~~liability~~that byare ~~using~~recognized aor ~~consistent~~disclosed ~~measurement~~in ~~attribute~~the —financial statements at fair value. ~~Management~~at ~~plans~~least toannually. ~~adopt~~Therefore, ~~SFAS~~the ~~No.~~Company ~~156~~adopted onthe ~~January~~provisions 1,of ~~2008~~ASC ~~and~~820-10 itfor isnon-financial ~~anticipated~~assets ~~that~~and ~~the~~non-financial ~~initial~~liabilities ~~adoption~~effective ofJanuary 1, ~~this~~2009, ~~statement~~and ~~will~~such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s ~~financial~~consolidated ~~position,~~ results of operations, or ~~cash~~financial ~~flows~~condition.

InEffective ~~June~~April 1, ~~2006~~2009, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted FASB ~~Interpretation~~ASC ~~No. 48~~820-10-65, ~~“Accounting~~Fair ~~for~~Value ~~Uncertainty~~Measurements inand ~~Income~~Disclosures ~~Taxes~~– —Overall an– ~~Interpretation~~Transition ofand ~~FASB~~Open ~~Statement~~Effective ~~No.~~Date ~~109”~~Information (“~~FIN 48~~ASC 820-10-65”). ~~FIN~~ 48ASC 820-10-65 provides additional guidance for ~~recognizing~~estimating ~~and~~fair ~~measuring~~value ~~uncertain tax positions, as defined~~ in ~~SFAS~~accordance ~~109,~~with ~~Accounting~~ASC ~~for~~820-10 ~~Income~~when ~~Taxes. FIN~~the 48volume ~~prescribes~~and alevel ~~threshold~~of ~~condition~~activity ~~that a tax position must meet~~ for ~~any~~an ofasset ~~the~~or ~~benefit~~liability ofhave ~~the~~significantly ~~uncertain tax position to be recognized in the financial statements~~decreased. ~~Guidance~~ isASC ~~also provided regarding de~~820-~~recognition,~~10-65 ~~classification~~also ~~and~~includes ~~disclosure~~guidance ofon ~~these~~identifying ~~uncertain~~circumstances ~~tax~~that ~~positions. FIN~~indicate 48a transaction is ~~effective~~not ~~for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and has no current applicability to the Company’s financial statements~~orderly. ~~Management~~ ~~adopted~~The ~~FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, and the initial~~ adoption of ~~FIN~~ASC 48820-10-65 did not have aan ~~material~~ impact on the Company’s ~~financial~~consolidated ~~position,~~ results of operations, or ~~cash~~financial ~~flows~~condition.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under GAAP. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the required disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with earlier adoption permitted. Management plans to adopt SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008, and it is anticipated that the initial adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

On February 6, 2008, the FASB issued Financial Staff Position FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157.” This Staff Position delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The delay is intended to allow the FASB and constituents additional time to consider the effect of various implementation issues that have arisen, or that may arise, from the application of SFAS No. 157. The remainder of SFAS No. 157 was adopted by us effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

F-11

InEffective ~~September~~April 1, ~~2006~~2009, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ~~Statement~~FASB ~~No.~~ASC ~~158~~825-10-65, ~~“Employers’~~Financial ~~Accounting~~Instruments ~~for~~– ~~Defined~~Overall ~~Benefit~~– ~~Pension~~Transition and ~~Other~~Open ~~Postretirement~~Effective ~~Plans”~~Date Information (“~~SFAS~~ASC ~~No. 158~~825-10-65”)~~, an amendment of FASB Statements No~~. ~~87,~~ASC ~~88,~~825-10-65 ~~106~~amends ~~and~~ASC ~~132(R).~~825-10 ~~SFAS~~to ~~No.~~require ~~158~~disclosures ~~requires~~about ~~(a) recognition of the funded status (measured as the difference between the~~ fair value of ~~the~~financial ~~plan~~instruments ~~assets and the benefit obligation) of a benefit plan as an asset or liability~~ in ~~the~~interim ~~employer’s statement of~~ financial ~~position,~~statements ~~(b)~~as ~~measurement~~well ~~of the funded status~~ as ~~of the employer’s fiscal year-end with limited exceptions, and (c) recognition of changes~~ in ~~the~~annual ~~funded~~financial ~~status~~statements ~~in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan~~ and ~~the~~also ~~disclosure~~amends ~~requirements~~ASC ~~are~~270-10 ~~effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement~~ to ~~measure~~require ~~the~~those ~~plan~~disclosures ~~assets~~in ~~and~~all ~~benefit~~interim ~~obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of~~ financial ~~position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. SFAS No. 158 has no current applicability to the Company’s financial~~ statements. ~~Management~~ ~~adopted~~The ~~SFAS No. 158 on December 31, 2006 and the~~ adoption of ~~SFAS~~ASC ~~No.~~825-10-65 ~~158~~ did not have a material impact toon the Company’s ~~financial~~consolidated ~~position,~~ results of operations, or ~~cash~~financial ~~flows~~condition.

In ~~September~~May ~~2006~~2009, the ~~Securities~~FASB ~~Exchange Commission~~ issued ~~Staff~~SFAS ~~Accounting Bulletin~~ No. ~~108~~165, (“~~SAB~~Subsequent ~~No. 108~~Events”~~). SAB~~, ~~No.~~which ~~108~~is ~~addresses~~included ~~how the effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements~~ in ~~current~~ASC ~~year~~Topic ~~financial~~855, ~~statements. SAB~~Subsequent NoEvents. ~~108~~ASC ~~requires~~Topic ~~companies~~855 toestablished ~~quantify~~principles ~~misstatements~~and ~~using~~requirements afor ~~balance~~evaluating ~~sheet~~ and ~~income~~reporting ~~statement~~subsequent ~~approach~~events and todistinguishes ~~evaluate~~which ~~whether~~subsequent ~~either~~events ~~approach~~should ~~results~~be recognized in ~~quantifying~~the anfinancial ~~error~~statements ~~that~~versus iswhich ~~material~~subsequent inevents ~~light~~should ofbe ~~relevant~~disclosed ~~quantitative~~in ~~and~~the ~~qualitative~~financial ~~factors~~statements. ~~When~~ ~~the~~ASC ~~effect~~Topic of855 ~~initial~~also ~~adoption~~required isdisclosure ~~material,~~of ~~companies~~the ~~will~~date ~~record~~through ~~the~~which ~~effect~~subsequent asevents aare ~~cumulative~~evaluated ~~effect~~by ~~adjustment~~management. ASC toTopic ~~beginning~~855 ofwas ~~year~~effective ~~retained~~for ~~earnings~~interim ~~and~~periods ~~disclose~~ending ~~the~~after ~~nature~~June 15, 2009 and ~~amount~~applies ofprospectively. Because ~~each~~ASC ~~individual~~Topic ~~error~~855 ~~being~~impacted ~~corrected in~~ the ~~cumulative~~disclosure ~~adjustment. SAB~~requirements, ~~No.~~and ~~108~~not ~~became~~the ~~effective~~accounting ~~beginning~~treatment ~~January~~for 1subsequent events, ~~2007~~the ~~and its~~ adoption ~~did~~of ~~not~~ASC ~~have~~Topic a855 ~~material~~did not impact onour ~~the Company’s financial position,~~ results of operations, or ~~cash~~financial ~~flows~~condition. .

InEffective ~~February~~July 1, ~~2007~~2009, the ~~FASB~~Company ~~issued~~adopted ~~Statement~~FASB ASU No. ~~159~~ 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) (“~~The~~ASU 2009-05”). ASU 2009-05 provided amendments to ASC 820-10, Fair Value ~~Option~~Measurements ~~for~~and ~~Financial~~Disclosures ~~Assets~~– ~~and~~Overall, ~~Financial~~for ~~Liabilities”~~the ~~(“SFAS~~fair Novalue measurement of liabilities. ~~159”),~~ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an ~~amendment~~active ofmarket ~~FASB~~for ~~Statement~~the ~~No.~~identical ~~115.~~liability ~~SFAS~~is ~~No.~~not ~~159~~available, ~~addresses~~a ~~how~~reporting ~~companies~~entity ~~should~~is ~~measure~~required ~~many~~to ~~financial~~measure ~~instruments~~fair ~~and~~value using certain ~~other~~techniques. ~~items~~ASU at2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating the fair value~~. The~~ ~~objective~~of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to ~~mitigate~~include ~~volatility~~a inseparate ~~reported~~input ~~earnings~~or ~~caused~~adjustment byto ~~measuring~~other ~~related~~inputs ~~assets~~relating ~~and~~to ~~liabilities~~the ~~differently~~existence ~~without~~of ~~having~~a torestriction ~~apply~~that ~~complex~~prevents ~~hedge~~the ~~accounting~~transfer ~~provisions.~~of ~~SFAS~~a Noliability. ~~159~~ASU is2009-05 ~~effective~~also ~~for~~clarifies ~~fiscal~~that ~~years~~both ~~beginning~~a ~~after~~quoted ~~November~~price ~~15,~~in ~~2007,~~an ~~with~~active ~~earlier~~market ~~adoption~~for ~~permitted. SFAS~~the ~~No.~~identical ~~159~~liability ~~had~~at ~~been~~the ~~adopted~~measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. Adoption of ASU 2009-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s ~~financial~~consolidated ~~position,~~ results of operations, or ~~cash~~financial ~~flows~~condition.

In ~~December~~October ~~2007~~2009, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~ASU ~~No.~~2009-13, ~~160~~Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, ~~Noncontrolling~~(amendments ~~Interests~~to inFASB ~~Consolidated~~ASC ~~Financial~~Topic ~~Statements~~605, –Revenue anRecognition) ~~amendment~~(“ASU of2009-13”) ~~ARB~~and ~~No.~~ASU 512009-14, Certain Arrangements That Include Software Elements, (~~SFAS~~amendments ~~No.~~to ~~160~~FASB ASC Topic 985, Software): ~~SFAS~~(“ASU No2009-14”). ASU ~~160~~2009-13 ~~establishes~~requires ~~accounting~~entities ~~and~~to ~~reporting~~allocate ~~standards~~revenue ~~for~~in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of the ~~noncontrolling~~delivered ~~interest~~goods inand services based on a ~~subsidiary~~selling price hierarchy. The amendments eliminate the residual method of revenue allocation and ~~for~~require revenue to be allocated using the ~~deconsolidation~~relative selling price method. ASU 2009-14 removes tangible products from the scope of software revenue guidance and provides guidance on determining whether software deliverables in an arrangement that includes a ~~subsidiary~~tangible product are covered by the scope of the software revenue guidance. ~~This~~ ASU ~~statement~~2009-13 isand ~~effective~~ASU ~~for~~2009-14 ~~financial~~should ~~statements~~be ~~issued~~applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after ~~December~~ June 15, ~~2008~~2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of ~~this~~ASU ~~statement~~2009-13 ~~will~~or ~~not~~ASU 2009-14 to have a material impact on ~~our~~the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial ~~statements~~condition.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R (revised 2007), “Business Combinations.” Although this statement amends and replaces SFAS No. 141, it retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that (i) the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations; and (ii) an acquirer be identified for each business combination. SFAS No. 141R defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. This Statement applies to all transactions or other events in which an entity (the acquirer) obtains control of one or more businesses (the acquiree), including combinations achieved without the transfer of consideration; however, this Statement does not apply to a combination between entities or businesses under common control. Significant provisions of SFAS No. 141R concern principles and requirements for how an acquirer (i)recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 with early adoption not permitted. Management is assessing the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 141R.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51" ("FAS No. 160"). FAS No.160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. FAS No. 160 is effective for the Company in its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. The Company does not believe this statement will have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations upon adoption.

In March 2008, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This standard is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring more disclosure about the location and amounts of derivative instruments in an entity’s financial statements; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No 133; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for the Company’s first quarter of 2009. As this pronouncement is only disclosure related, it will not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

F-12

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years and should be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. FSP FAS 142-3 also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination of intangible asset useful lives for intangible assets and should be applied to all intangible asset recognized as of, and subsequent to the effective date. The impact of FSP FAS 142-3 will depend on the size and nature of acquisitions on or after January 1, 2009.

In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities” (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, on a retrospective basis and will be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any; the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 could have on its calculation of EPS. The Company does not expect EITF 03-6-1 to impact the financial statements.

Note 2: Dispositions and Reclassifications

~~Certain~~There ~~operations (specifically, the sale of certain assets of Prime Time Broadband, Inc., and, subsequently, the sale of Prime Time Broadband, Inc.) that~~ were ~~active~~no indispositions ~~the~~or ~~year~~reclassifications ~~ended~~although ~~December~~we ~~31,~~have ~~2006,~~regrouped ~~were~~our ~~discontinued~~Marketing ~~in 2007~~Segments.

Sale of Certain Assets of Prime Time Broadband, Inc.

On May 1, 2007, the limited liability companies representing the unconsolidated equity investments of the Company closed the sale of the majority of their operating assets. Proceeds of the sale for the Company’s 50% interest in those assets were $1,225,000. The Company’s interests of 50% in these entities were included in the Company financial statements using the equity method of accounting. In conjunction with this sale, the Company acquired the rights to access the buyer’s subscriber customer base for purposes of marketing, market research and polling at a negotiated cost of $200,000.

Sale of Prime Time Broadband, Inc.

On May 31, 2007, the Company sold Prime Time Broadband, Inc. and its remaining core construction and operating business to its former owner. Consideration for the sale was 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at the current market value of $.59 per share or a total of $118,000.

Note 3: Acquisition of Subsidiaries and Investments

~~Acquisition~~On June 26, 2009, the Company entered into agreements whereby it acquired 100% of ~~Barbara~~the ~~Overhoff~~outstanding stock of BrandStand Group, Inc., ~~d/b/a~~(“BGI”). The ~~Bill~~acquisition ~~Main~~was ~~and~~completed ~~Associates~~in two transactions.

OnIn ~~May~~the ~~16,~~first ~~2007~~transaction, the Company ~~completed~~entered a stock purchase agreement for the acquisition of ~~the~~32% ~~common~~of ~~stock~~Brandstand’s ofoutstanding ~~Barbara~~stock ~~Overhoff,~~in ~~Inc.,~~exchange ~~d/b/~~for a ~~Bill~~promissory ~~Main~~note ~~and~~in ~~Associates~~the amount of $400,000. ~~Consideration~~The ofnote yields 8% interest per annum and payments are due quarterly in the ~~acquisition~~amount ~~was~~of ~~743~~$105,~~000~~049.50 ~~shares~~with ~~originally~~the ~~issued,~~first ~~82,500~~payment ~~shares~~due ~~issued~~September to26, ~~escrow~~2009 and ~~$175~~quarterly thereafter with the balance due on or before June 26,~~000~~ ~~paid~~2010 in(the ~~cash~~“Note”). The ~~shares~~note ~~are~~is ~~valued~~secured atby ~~fair~~a ~~value~~pledge ~~determined~~and bysecurity ~~the~~agreement ~~market~~under ~~price~~which on the ~~date~~Company pledged 100% of the ~~agreement,~~issued ~~January~~and ~~18,~~outstanding ~~2007,~~shares orin ~~$.23~~BGI ~~per~~(the ~~share~~“Pledge Agreement”). James ~~Stock~~P. ~~fair~~Gregory ~~value~~and ~~will~~Thomas beW. ~~$170,890~~Cady ~~for~~each ~~current~~received ~~issue~~100,000 shares, ~~and~~of ~~$18,975~~AIMS ~~for~~common ~~escrow~~stock ~~shares,~~in exchange for acting a ~~total~~co-makers ~~investment~~with ofrespect ~~$364,865.~~to ~~This~~financing ~~acquisition~~an ~~was~~interim ~~recorded~~step asin athe ~~purchase~~transaction ~~and~~in ~~operations~~which ~~were~~Gregory ~~included~~and inCady ~~Company~~purchased ~~operations~~32% ~~from~~of the ~~date~~BGI ofstock ~~the~~from ~~acquisition,~~Timothy ~~May~~C. ~~16,~~Cusick ~~2007. The~~in ~~purchase~~exchange ~~price~~for ~~was~~their ~~allocated~~promissory tonote in the ~~acquired~~same ~~assets~~amount and ~~assumed~~bearing ~~liabilities~~the ~~based~~same onterms and conditions as the ~~fair~~Note, ~~value~~followed by a sale of the ~~assets~~BGI ~~and~~Shares ~~liabilities~~to ~~and~~the ~~recorded~~Company asin ~~follows:~~exchange for the Note and Pledge Agreement.

Current assets	$	116,579
Property and equipment		33,312
Non-compete agreements		400,000
Trademark and trade secrets		168,945
Total assets acquired		718,836
Current liabilities		(353,971)
Total liabilities assumed		(353,971)
Net assets acquired	$	364,865

F-12

In the second transaction, the Company contributed $350,000 in cash, and 1,600,000 shares of AIMS common stock to its newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary, AIMS MS 1 Corporation (“AIMS MS 1”), a Pennsylvania corporation. The Company and AIMS MS 1 entered into an acquisition agreement and an agreement and plan of merger with BGI, pursuant to which AIMS MS 1 merged with BGI, with BGI the surviving corporation. Timothy C Cusick, owner of the remaining 68% of the outstanding shares in BGI exchanged these shares for 1,500,000 shares of AIMS common stock and $350,000.00 in cash. The Company exchanged its 32% of the shares in BGI and 100% of its shares in AIMS MS 1 for 1,000 shares of BGI. Post-closing, the Company owns 1,000 shares of BGI common stock. These shares constitute 100% of the issued and outstanding shares in BGI. 100,000 shares of AIMS common stock was retained by BGI to use as incentive compensation to key employees.

In addition to the Note described above, AIMS borrowed $350,000 to finance the transaction. AIMS borrowed $350,000 at 18% interest per annum payable interest only on a quarterly basis beginning September 26, 2009 with the full balance due on June 26, 2010 (the “Loans”). An origination fee and cost reimbursement in the amount of $35,000 is due at maturity (unless extended in which case it is due on the extended maturity date). The lenders received a warrant to purchase 350,000 shares of AIMS common stock at $0.352 per share over a five year period. The Company has the right to extend the maturity date for six months. If it elects to do so the lenders will receive an additional warrant to purchase 175,000 shares of AIMS common stock at $0.352 and an additional origination fee and cost reimbursement in the amount of $17,500 due and payable on the extended maturity date. James P. Gregory received 100,000 shares of AIMS common stock in exchange for his guaranty of a portion of the Loans, Thomas W. Cady received 50,000 shares of AIMS common stock for providing a portion of the loans, and Chris Petersen received 25,000 shares of AIMS common stock for providing a portion of the loans.

Timothy C. Cusick continued in the employ of BGI post-closing on a full-time basis through November 30, 2009, as the chief executive officer and a director. Thereafter, Mr. Cusick will provide part-time services to BGI. Mr. Cusick’s employment agreement with BGI precludes him from competing with BGI for a period of five years.

BrandStand is a branding, marketing and customer-generating service to the restaurant and retail industry. BrandStand clients include national and regional accounts such as Silver Diner, Burger King, Schlotzsky’s and Z-Pizza.

Note 4: Related Party Transactions

During 2009 the Company received additional capital from the following related parties: Christine Garcia $83,500; Charles Brunie, $200,000; and Thomas W. Cady, $62,500

In 2009 we expensed $50 to the spouse of an officer for services. We expensed $171,248 for legal services provided by a company partially owned by a shareholder; half if the balance was paid in common stock converted at $.65 (65 cents) per share. We negotiated debt to another law firm, owned by a shareholder, from $55,250 to $10,000, issuing 150,000 common shares as part of the settlement.

As of December 31, 2009, we were indebted to related party Michael Foudy in the form of Accounts Payable in the amount of $12,464.

F-13

~~Management~~As of ~~AIMS~~December ~~determined~~31, ~~while evaluating this potential acquisition~~2009, ~~that~~we ~~the~~were ~~primary~~indebted ~~value~~ to bethe ~~acquired~~following ~~was~~related ~~the~~parties ~~intangible~~(or ~~value~~persons ofwho at the ~~personal~~time ~~services~~ of the ~~two~~debt ~~principals;~~transaction ~~additional~~were ~~value~~related ~~was~~parties) in the, ~~reputation~~form ~~and work product and methods~~ of ~~those~~current ~~individuals. Accordingly~~liabilities, ~~the substantial intangible value was allocated to the non-compete restrictions~~ in the ~~purchase~~following ~~agreements and the remainder to trademarks and trade secrets such as work methods~~amounts, ~~copyrights,~~which ~~and~~include ~~proprietary~~principal ~~information interchange available at www.BillMainandAssociates.com~~ and its proprietary “Trade Secrets” as specifically noted on the website. Cost of the intangible assets will be amortized over the five-year life of the non-compete agreements resulting in an annual amortization charge of $113,789 for each of the five years.interest:

~~Acquisition~~Gerald ofand/or ~~55%~~Christine ~~of IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC~~Garcia*

On July 26, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of 55% of IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, with a two year option from that date to acquire the remaining 45% ownership. The interest is 55% ownership in the business transferred to the LLC from IKON Holdings, Inc. Consideration of the acquisition was 1,650,000 shares originally issued in 2006, valued at that time at $~~.90 per share and held in escrow pending funding. Closing was July 26~~155, 2007, with final payment of $1,385,000 in cash in addition to $100,000 previously paid. The shares are valued at fair value determined by the market price on the date of closing of the transaction in 2007 at $.58 per share. Stock and cash consideration total $2,645,000 as total payment for the 55% ownership interest. This acquisition was recorded as a purchase and operations were included in Company operations from the date of the acquisition, July 26, 2007. The purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on the fair value of the assets and liabilities and recorded as follows:867

Current assets	$	274,968
Property and equipment		109,138
Other assets		77,254
Goodwill		2,732,431
Total assets acquired		3,193,791
Current liabilities		(268,419)
Long term liabilities		(280,372)
Total liabilities assumed		(548,791)
Net assets acquired	$	2,645,000

Thomas W. Cady*

~~IKON Public Affairs Group~~62, LLC (“IPAG”) is a limited liability company formed under the of Delaware laws. Post-closing, IPAG, through its offices in Washington, D.C., and Denver will continue the business previously conducted by IKON Holdings, Inc., providing consulting services in connection with political campaigns and issue advocacy. Management of AIMS determined, while evaluating this potential acquisition, that the primary value to be acquired was the intangible value and the reputation and work product of the business, inseparable from individual intangible assets. Accordingly, the substantial value was allocated to Goodwill. Impairment expense of $87,431 was reported in 2007 to adjust this asset relative to appraised value.500

~~Acquisition~~Thomas ~~of Target America, Inc~~W. Cady

~~On July 26~~303, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the common stock of Target America, Inc. Consideration of the acquisition was 277,778 shares originally issued in 2006, valued at that time at $.90 per share, or $250,000, and held in escrow pending funding. Closing was July 26, 2007 with a final payment of $1,600,000 in cash in addition to $150,000 previously paid and issuance of an additional 300,000 shares of common stock valued at $.58, or $270,000. The shares are revalued at fair value determined by the market price on the date of closing in 2007. Stock and cash total $2,085,111 as total payment for the acquisition. This acquisition was recorded as a purchase and operations were included in Company operations from the date of the acquisition, July 26, 2007. The purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on the fair value of the assets and liabilities and recorded as follows:282

Current assets	$	72,135
Property and equipment		20,000
Other assets		5,000
Software systems and programs		802,850
Goodwill		1,263,745
Total assets acquired		2,163,730
Current liabilities		(78,619)
Total liabilities assumed		(78,619)
Net assets acquired	$	2,085,111

Charles H. Brunie**

248,452

Michael L. Foudy, as ATB debtholder

930,462

Media Partners, as ATB debtholder

280,877

Max E. Miller, as ATB debtholder

224,022

Dennison E. Smith, as ATB debtholder

449,135

---------------

$2,654,597

* Ms. Garcia's and Mr. Cady's Promissory Notes bear no interest.

In 2008 we expensed consulting fees which we paid or plan to pay in cash totaling ($55,000), which was a credit taken against the balance due to him from previous years

In 2008, we expensed consulting fees which we paid or plan to pay in cash totaling $144,063 to eight individual shareholders, none of whom was officers or directors:

Christine Garcia

$300

Global Equity Society / Rudy Lamers

750

GMMJ Partners (CREDIT) *

(38,304)

Gregory & Plotkin / James D. Gregory **

9,767

Liebeck Morris / Chris Petersen

31,050

James D. Lyke

3,000

Denison E. Smith

128,500

Stevens GouldPincus / Arthur Stevens

9,000

$144,063

* During 2008 GMMJ Partners took a credit against amounts owed from previous fiscal years.

** In addition to cash payment for his services Mr. Gregory received 7,488 shares of AIMS Worldwide, Inc., restricted common stock.

As of December 31, 2008, AIMS Corporate was indebted to related parties in the form of Accounts Payable (related parties at the time the payables were posted) in the amount of $80,250:

Max Miller, PC

$55,250

Media Partners

25,000

$80,250

As of December 31, 2008, we were indebted to related party Christine Garcia in the form of a promissory note, bearing no interest, in the amount of $70,000.

As of December 31, 2008, ATB Media, Inc., was indebted to related parties in amounts as follows:

Accounts Payable

$12,464

Long-term Debt Principal

975,971

Long-term Debt Interest

906,711

$1,895,146

F-14

~~Based~~Unsecured innotes ~~Fairfax,~~payable ~~Va.,~~due ~~with~~to ~~offices~~ATB ~~in Indianapolis and Chicago~~Media, ~~Target America,~~ Inc., ~~was founded in 1995~~indebtedness, ~~under~~due ~~the~~on ~~laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia~~demand, ~~to meet the rapidly changing needs of not-for-profit charity~~ and ~~philanthropy~~related ~~fundraising~~accrued ~~professionals. The~~interest ~~company is a constant innovator in the field of contributor and donor prospect research, developing and launching a completely online prospect screening service in 2003. Target America continues~~ to ~~upgrade~~related ~~and~~parties develop this tool, which now includes a wide range of services from automated Internet research to an integrated wealth profile database management system to serve not only the not-for profit community, but business, commerce and financial institutions as ~~well. Management~~ of ~~AIMS~~December ~~determined~~31, ~~while evaluating this potential acquisition~~2008, that the primary value to be acquired was the intangible value of the reproduceable value of the source code and software and the expansion opportunities enabled. Accordingly, the substantial intangible value was allocated to the code. Cost of the intangible assets will be amortized over the seven-year expected life of the source code and systems resulting in an annual amortization charge of$114,693 for each of the seven years. The remaining cost, totaling $1,263,745 was allotted to Goodwill to reflect the on-going earning power of the business as a whole.follow:

~~Pro forma results of operations had Bill Main & Associates, IKON, and Target America been included in operations for the year ended~~ December 31, ~~2007, are as follows:~~2008

		AIMS		Bill Main		IKON		Target America		Pro Forma
		Worldwide		January 1 to		January 1 to		January 1 to
		As Reported		May 16, 2007		July 26, 2007		July 26, 2007
Year 2007
Revenue	$	2,119,459	$	142,879	$	1,579,829	$	660,222	$	4,502,389
Operating income (loss)		(2,962,239)		(92,198)		54,015		5,547		(2,994,875)
Net income (loss)		(3,189,670)		(92,198)		97,209		45,753		(3,138,906)
Net loss per share		(.08)								(.08)

Balance

~~Note 4: Related Party Transactions~~Balance

~~As of December 31, 2008, ATB Media, Inc., was indebted to related parties in the amount of $1,895,146:~~Principal

Accounts Payable	$	12,464
Long-term Debt Principal		975,971
Long-term Debt Interest		906,711
	$	1,895,146

Interest

AsDenison ~~of December 31~~Smith*, ~~2008,~~12% ~~AIMS Corporate was indebted to related parties in the form of Accounts Payable in the amount of $80,250:~~interest

Max Miller, PC	$	55,250
Media Partners		25,000
	$	80,250

$248,712

$200,424

* related party prior to 2007

Gerald Garcia, Jr., 10% interest

30,000

39,000

Max Miller, 15% interest on fee only

125,000

99,022

Media Partners, 6.5%

164,515

99,955

Michael Foudy, -0-% interest

125,000

Michael Foudy, 15% interest, excl. fee

282,744

468,310

Total

$975,971

$906,711

In 2008 we renegotiated and terminated our license agreement with GMMJ Partners.

As of December 31, 2008, AIMS Corporate was indebted to related party in the form of a note payable in the amount of $70,000.

~~Unsecured~~In ~~notes payable~~2008, ~~due~~for onAIMS ~~demand~~Corporate, we expensed consulting fees and ~~related~~Directors ~~accrued~~fees ~~interest~~which we paid or plan to ~~related~~pay ~~parties~~in ascash totaling $(55,000), a credit due to renegotiation of ~~December~~amounts ~~31,~~due ~~2008,~~to ~~for~~one ~~ATB~~consultant ~~Media~~from previous fiscal years, ~~Inc.~~and $23,750 ~~follow:~~to Directors and related parties who acted in the capacity of consultant.

		December 31, 2008
		Balance		Balance
		Principal		Interest
Denison Smith*, 12% interest	$	248,712	$	200,424
* related party prior to 2007
Gerald Garcia, Jr., 10% interest		30,000		39,000
Max Miller, 15% interest on fee only		125,000		99,022
Media Partners, 6.5%		164,515		99,955
Michael Foudy, -0-% interest		125,000		-
Michael Foudy, 15% interest, excl. fee		282,744		468,310
Total	$	975,971	$	906,711

Consulting

~~In 2008 and 2007, respectively, for AIMS Corporate, we expensed consulting fees and~~ Directors fees which we paid or plan to pay in cash totaling $(55,000), a credit due to renegotiation of amounts due to one consultant from previous fiscal years, and $23,750 to Directors and related parties who acted in the capacity of consultant.

~~F-15~~Fees 2008

		Consulting		Directors
		Fees 2008		Fees 2008
Thomas W. Cady	$	(55,000)	$	-
Michael L. Foudy		-		-
Theodore L. Innes		-		-
Herbert I. London		-		-
Max E. Miller		-		n/a
	$	(55,000)	$	-
		Consulting		Directors
		Fees 2007		Fees 2007
Thomas W. Cady	$	5,000	$	2,000
Michael L. Foudy		8,750		-
Theodore L. Innes		-		2,000
Herbert I. London		-		2,000
Max E. Miller		3,500		n/a
	$	17,250	$	6,000

Fees 2008

Thomas W. Cady

$ (55,000)

$ -

Michael L. Foudy

Theodore L. Innes

Herbert I. London

Max E. Miller

n/a

$(55,000)

$ -

In 2008 we leased real estate from shareholder Craig Snyder in the total amount of $202,642.

In 2008 we terminated a license agreement with a partnership that included our officers and shareholders under which the partnership would have paid an initial fee of $1,500 and a royalty of one percent of revenue for the use of business methods, processes and intellectual property developed by the constituent partners, including the “Accurate Integrated Marketing Solutions” business services model and related trade secret systems and processes, URLs, logos and trade names.

Note 5: Property and Equipment

Listed below are the major classes of property and equipment as of December 31, 2009:

Furniture, fixtures, and computing equipment

$196,653

Less accumulated depreciation

(119,020)

Net property and equipment:

$76,733

Listed below are the major classes of property and equipment as of December 31, 2008:

Furniture, fixtures, and computing equipment	$	222,972
Less accumulated depreciation		(67,674)
Net property and equipment:	$	155,298

Furniture, fixtures, and computing equipment

~~Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 is~~ $26222,~~446 and $28,356, respectively.~~972

Less accumulated depreciation

(67,674)

Net property and equipment:

$155,298

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is $68,018 and $26,446, respectively.

F-15

Note 6: Intangible Assets

Listed below are the major classes of intangible assets as of December 31, 2009:


	Value	New Accum	Net
HWL	174,200.00	(174,200.00)	-
SF Brand	197,238.00	(154,389.00)	42,849.00
IKON	3,800,781.00	(3,159,705.00)	641,076.00
Target America	295,415.00	(114,693.00)	180,722.00
Ygnition	200,000.00	(106,667.00)	93,333.00
Brandstand - five year non compete	150,000.00	(15,000.00)	135,000.00
Brandstand - two year non compete	250,000.00	(62,500.00)	187,500.00
	5,067,634.00	(3,787,154.00)	1,280,480.00

	2010	2013	Thereafter
	-	-	-
HWL	42,849.00		-
SF Brand	203,149.00	31,629.00	-
IKON	114,693.00	-	-
Target America	40,000.00		-
Ygnition	30,000.00	30,000.00	15,000.00
Brandstand - five year non compete	125,000.00	-	-
Brandstand - two year non compete
	555,691.00	61,629.00	15,000.00

Intangible amortization expense was $497,363 and $493,471 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Listed below are the major classes of intangible assets as of December 31, 2008:

		Original		Less accumulated		Net value
		intangible value		amortization		intangible assets
HWL Letters of intent	$	174,200	$	159,683	$	14,337
Street Fighter brand		300,000		67,500		232,500
SF published materials and trademarks		175,044		39,385		135,659
Bill Main intangibles		568,945		184,908		384,037
Target America		802,850		162,482		640,368
Ygnition cable customers		200,000		66,667		133,333
	$	2,221,039	$	680,625	$	1,540,414

Original

~~Intangible~~Less ~~amortization expense was $359,537 and $236,628 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The estimated aggregate intangible amortization expenses for the succeeding years are:~~accumulated

2009		$330,504
2010		$315,987
2011		$315,987
2012		$218,202
2013		$162,197
Thereafter		$197,536

Net value

intangible value

amortization

intangible assets

HWL Letters of intent

$174,200

$159,683

$14,337

Street Fighter brand

300,000

67,500

232,500

SF published materials and trademarks

175,044

39,385

135,659

Bill Main intangibles

568,945

184,908

384,037

Target America

802,850

162,482

640,368

Ygnition cable customers

200,000

66,667

133,333

$2,221,039

$680,625

$1,540,414

Intangible amortization expense was $359,537 and $236,628 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

F-16

Note 7: Accounts Payable and Notes Payable

Accounts Payable, current notes and interest payable and accrued interest to related and nonrelated parties consist of the following amounts at December 31, 2009:

Balance of payables/notes

and accrued interest

By Corporation, Total Liabilities

AIMS Corporate

1,779,139.45

AIMS Interactive, Inc.

0.00

ATB Media, Inc.

4,437,204.56

Bill Main and Associates

261,517.82

BrandStand Group, Inc.

514,230.99

Harrell, Woodcock, and Linkletter

0.00

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC

654,136.28

Streetfighter Marketing, Inc.

255,802.06

Target America, Inc.

211,501.10

----------------

$8,113,530.26

By Debtholder

Total Accounts Payable

$1,159,377.00

Other Current Liabilities

Accrued FICA Payable

7,554.39

Accrued liabilties - other

(1,326.92)

Accrued payroll taxes

86.00

Accrued Salary & Wages Payable

98,750.00

Accrues tax liabililties

35,672.55

Angela Noble

995,000.00

Armor M. Riyamy.

42,660.53

Barbara Geshekter

88,352.88

Barbara Nappy

(2,951.00)

Barbara Nappy

39,785.00

BB&T LOC

299,789.21

Charles Brunie

248,452.06

Chase Bank Credit Line

75,000.00

Chris Findlater

200,000.00

Chris Petersen

(1,091.50)

Chris Petersen

14,715.00

Christine Garcia

153,500.00

Christine Garcia

2,367.12

Christopher Phillip

995,000.00

Client Deposits

8,124.49

Deferred Revenue

274,485.38

Denison Smith

449,135.12

Denison Smith

89,454.26

Dominic Delpapa

59,070.00

Edward DeBolt,

95,322.40

F. TracySchnonrock

19,021.93

FG Investments

270,389.64

Gene Jewett

8,609.87

James P. Gregory

(16,169.50)

Janice Smith

19,021.90

John C. Thomas

18,997.38

Keith Stein

55,374.69

Marlin Hulse

38,035.63

Max Miller

220,671.24

Max Miller

3,351.00

Max Miller

37,448.77

Media Partners

280,876.65

F-17

Michael L. Foudy

125,000.00

Michael L. Foudy

13,404.00

Michael L. Foudy

779,593.86

Morris Monesson

37,991.09

Overdraft Protection

1,956.96

Terrence J. Scofield

19,008.22

Thomas W. Cady & James Gregory

200,000.00

Thomas W. Cady

(8,085.00)

Thomas W. Cady

109,000.00

Thomas W. Cady

64,867.12

Tri Counties Bank Expressline

37,442.32

U.S. Bank Credit Line

46,268.34

William Tucker Main

20,000.00

Other current liabilities

25,234.31

Total Other Current Liabilities

6,694,217.41

Long-Term Liabilities

Auto lease - Becker

81,529.07

BB&T Loan Payable

156,637.00

Jeff Slutsky

972.36

Marc Slutsky

8,617.68

Wells Fargo LOC

12,281.93

Total Long-Term Liabilities

260,038.04

------------------

Total Liabilities

$8,118,032.26

Current notes and interest payable and accrued interest to related and nonrelated parties consist of the following amounts at Dec. 31, 2008:

		Balance of note
		and accrued interest
Related to AIMS Corp
Thomson, Margaret (11.25% + $5,000)	$	50,000
Garcia, Christine (0%)		70,000
Related to ATB Media, Inc.
DeBolt, 10% interest rate (reduced debt)		92,000
Foudy, Michael -0-% interest		125,000
Foudy, Michael 15% interest, excl. fee		751,056
Garcia, Gerald, Jr., 10% interest		69,000
Hulse, Ms. Marlin, 10% interest		36,041
Jewett, Gene, 10% interest rate		8,162
Media Partners, 6.5%		264,470
Miller, Max, 15% interest on fee only		242,772
Monesson, Morris, 10% interest		35,991
Noble, 11% interest		940,000
Phillips, 11% interest		940,000
Riyamy, Armor M., 10% interest		40,666
Schonrock, F. Tracy, 10% interest		18,025
Scofield, Terrence J., 10% interest		18,011
Smith, Denison, 12% interest		508,826
Smith, Janice, 10% interest		18,025
Stein, Keith, 10% interest rate		54,637
Thomas, John C., 10% interest		18,000
Related to Bill Main and Associates
Geshekter, Barbara, Loan Payable (10, 12, and 8%)		93,805
Main, Wm. Tucker Loan Payable (10% and 8%)		36,761
Tri Counties Bank (9.5%)		43,943
Wells Fargo Line of Credit (16.25%)		11,963
Related to IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC
Delpapa - Loan payable to Dominic DelPapa (0%)		39,070
Related to Streetfighter Marketing, Inc.
Chase line of credit (prime + 1/5, or 4.75% on 12/31)		75,000
US Bank (fixed 6.99%)		53,941
Slutsky, Jeff (8%)		10,757
Slutsky, Marc (8%)		10,901
Slutsky, Marc (0%)		5,000
Related to Target America, Inc.
McGee, James - Loan (0%)		28,025
Total	$	4,709,848

Balance of note

and accrued interest

Related to AIMS Corp

Thomson, Margaret (11.25% + $5,000)

$50,000

Garcia, Christine (0%)

70,000

Related to ATB Media, Inc.

DeBolt, 10% interest rate (reduced debt)

92,000

Foudy, Michael -0-% interest

125,000

Foudy, Michael 15% interest, excl. fee

751,056

Garcia, Gerald, Jr., 10% interest

69,000

Hulse, Ms. Marlin, 10% interest

36,041

Jewett, Gene, 10% interest rate

8,162

Media Partners, 6.5%

264,470

Miller, Max, 15% interest on fee only

242,772

Monesson, Morris, 10% interest

35,991

Noble, 11% interest

940,000

Phillips, 11% interest

940,000

Riyamy, Armor M., 10% interest

40,666

Schonrock, F. Tracy, 10% interest

18,025

Scofield, Terrence J., 10% interest

18,011

Smith, Denison, 12% interest

508,826

Smith, Janice, 10% interest

18,025

Stein, Keith, 10% interest rate

54,637

Thomas, John C., 10% interest

18,000

Related to Bill Main and Associates

Geshekter, Barbara, Loan Payable (10, 12, and 8%)

93,805

Main, Wm. Tucker Loan Payable (10% and 8%)

36,761

Tri Counties Bank (9.5%)

43,943

F-18

Wells Fargo Line of Credit (16.25%)

11,963

Related to IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC

Delpapa - Loan payable to Dominic DelPapa (0%)

39,070

Related to Streetfighter Marketing, Inc.

Chase line of credit (prime + 1/5, or 4.75% on 12/31)

75,000

US Bank (fixed 6.99%)

53,941

Slutsky, Jeff (8%)

10,757

Slutsky, Marc (8%)

10,901

Slutsky, Marc (0%)

5,000

Related to Target America, Inc.

McGee, James - Loan (0%)

28,025

Total

$4,709,848

We expect certain notes related to the ATB Media acquisition and accrued interest, totaling $4,180,680 (principal and interest) including $975,971 of related party notes to be repaid from proceeds of the sale of the radio station for which the loans were made and we have negotiated a tolling agreement with the two substantial note holders to provide time for the sale to be completed. The full balance is reflected as a current liability. These notes are uncollateralized, due on demand and in default.

FLong-17term debt at December 31, 2009, all attributed to IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, consisted of the following:

~~Long-term~~Note ~~debt~~payable ~~at December 31, 2008, all attributed~~ to ~~IKON~~a ~~Public Affairs Group~~bank, ~~LLC,~~due ~~consisted~~in ofmonthly ~~the~~installments ~~following:~~of

Note payable to a bank, due in monthly installments of $3,718
including interest at prime plus 1%, maturing May 2010, secured
by the personal guarantees of IKON members	$	205,828
Note payable to a bank, secured by company assets, with interest
at prime plus 1%		298,795
Capitalized vehicle lease obligation, non-cancellable		70,843
		575,466
Less: current maturities
IKON note payable		298,795
Capital lease obligation		55,309
Long-term debt	$	221,362

$3,718

~~Maturities~~including ofinterest ~~long-term~~at ~~debt~~prime ~~are~~plus as1%, ~~follows:~~maturing May 2010, secured

2009		354,104
2010		64,469
2011		29,292
2012		29,292
2013		29,292
Thereafter		69,017
	$	575,466

by the personal guarantees of IKON members

$156,637

Note payable to a bank, secured by company assets, with interest

at prime plus 1%

Capitalized vehicle lease obligation, non-cancellable

81,529

238,166

Less: current maturities

Capital lease obligation

52,970

Long-term debt

$185,196

Maturities of long-term debt at 12-31-08 follow:

2010

179,931

2011

23,294

2012

23,294

2013

11,647

2014

-0-

Thereafter

-0-

$238,166

F-19

Note 8: Income Taxes

Because we underwent an ownership change in 2002, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, our tax net operating loss carryforwards generated prior to the ownership change will be subject to an annual limitation, which could reduce or defer the utilization of those losses.

A reconciliation of U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to the effective rate follows for the years ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2009 follows:

	Year ended	Year ended
	Dec. 31, 2008	Dec. 31, 2007
U.S. statutory federal rate	31.96%	31.96%
State income tax rate, net	6.00%	6.00%
NOL for which no tax
benefit is currently available	-37.96%	-37.96%
	0.00%	0.00%

Year ended

Dec. 31, 2009

Dec. 31, 2008

U.S. statutory federal rate

31.96%

State income tax rate, net

6.00%

NOL for which no tax

benefit is currently available

-37.96%

0.00%

The benefit for income taxes from operations consisted of the following components at December 31, 2009: current tax benefit of $6,049,000 resulting from a net loss before income taxes, and deferred tax expense of $6,049,000 resulting from the valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax asset resulting from net operating losses.

The benefit for income taxes from operations consisted of the following components at December 31, 2008: current tax benefit of $5,236,000 resulting from a net loss before income taxes, and deferred tax expense of $5,236,000 resulting from the valuation allowance recorded against the deferred tax asset resulting from net operating losses.

The ~~benefit~~change in the valuation allowance for ~~income~~the ~~taxes~~year ~~from~~ended ~~operations~~December ~~consisted~~31, of2008, was $484,000. The change in the ~~following~~valuation ~~components~~allowance atfor the year ended December 31, ~~2007:~~2009, ~~current~~was ~~tax~~$813,000. Net ~~benefit~~operating ofloss $4carryforwards at December 31,~~752~~ 2009,~~000~~ ~~resulting~~will ~~from~~expire ain ~~net~~2029. The ~~loss~~valuation ~~before~~allowance ~~income~~will ~~taxes~~be evaluated at the end of each year, considering positive and ~~deferred~~negative ~~tax~~evidence ~~expense~~about ofwhether $4the asset will be realized. At that time,~~752,000~~ ~~resulting~~the ~~from~~allowance will either be increased or reduced; reduction could result in the ~~valuation~~complete elimination of the allowance ~~recorded~~if ~~against~~positive evidence indicates that the value of the deferred tax asset ~~resulting~~is ~~from~~no ~~net~~longer ~~operating~~impaired ~~losses~~and the allowance is no longer required.

The change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2008, was $484,000. The change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2007, was $1,305,000. Net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2008, will expire in 2028. The valuation allowance will be evaluated at the end of each year, considering positive and negative evidence about whether the asset will be realized. At that time, the allowance will either be increased or reduced; reduction could result in the complete elimination of the allowance if positive evidence indicates that the value of the deferred tax asset is no longer impaired and the allowance is no longer required.

F-18

Note 9: Lease Commitments

Following is information regarding the Company’s real estate and auto lease commitments:

AIMS Corporate

AIMS Corporate leases one office at 10400 Eaton Place, #203, Fairfax, Virginia from Scott Group / Eaton Place Associates. The original two-year lease expired August 31, 2008 and ~~was~~has been renewed ~~for another year~~yearly; we are currently paying $4,567 per month.

AIMS Interactive, Inc.

AIMS Interactive, ~~as of December 31, 2007,~~ had ~~one~~no ~~month-to-month~~ lease commitment ~~to Hamilton Properties~~ in ~~Tarpon Springs, Florida, for $337 per month, which expired January 31, 2008~~2009. ~~As of February 1, 2008, AIMS Interactive has no lease commitments~~

ATB Media, Inc.

ATB Media, Inc., had no lease commitments in 2008, and management foresees no lease commitments anytime in the future.

Bill Main and Associates

Bill Main and Associates has one lease commitment beginning May 1, 2007, to Ludwika Schein, landlord, at 236 Broadway, Chico, California, ending on April 30, 2009 (two years), currently at $1,500 per month. The lease iswas ~~renewable~~renewed for one extended term of five years but in early 2010 was terminated by both parties.

~~Bill Main and Associates has a lease commitment with BizHub for office equipment starting July 1, 2007, and ending June 30, 2012, (60 months) at a rate of $198.54 per month.~~F-20

Harrell, Woodcock, and Linkletter

Harrell, Woodcock, and Linkletter had no lease commitments in ~~2008~~2009, and management foresees no lease commitments anytime in the future.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases space from Saint James Associates Joint Venture at 200 West Washington Square, Philadelphia, starting April 8 and ending July 2009 at a monthly rate of $2,340. It ahs been renewed.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases office space from 837 LLC at 837 Sherman Street in the City Center in Denver, starting January 1, 2002, currently at a rate of $1,900 per month.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases space from landlord Craig Snyder at 1307 North 14th Street in Arlington, Virginia, 22209, at a monthly rate of $7,000, starting January 1, 2007, and ending three years thereafter.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases space from landlord Craig Snyder at 90 Alton Road, #2406, Miami Beach, Florida, starting January 1, 2003, and ending December 1, 2007, and renewed for another five years starting January 2008 for monthly payments equal to the payments on the first and second mortgages held on the property (amounts not stated in lease). The last monthly payment was $4,311.25 + $514.17 condo fee, totaling $4,825.22 per month.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases space from landlord Benny Brama at Related Properties at 217 East 96^th Street, #39-F, New York City, for a two-year period starting October 2007 and ending September 2009 for a monthly payment that totals the monthly payments on the first and second mortgages as well as all coop fees. Current payments are $3,795 per month for rent and approximately $500 per month for utilities.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases space from landlord Craig Snyder at 217 East 96^th Street, #39-H, New York City, for a three-year period for a monthly payment that total the monthly payments on the first and second mortgages as well as all coop fees. Current payments are $5,377.05 for monthly rent, $3,137 for monthly coop fee, and approximately $500 per month for utilities. The lease starts May 2007 and ends April 2010.

F-19

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases an Astin Martin automobile from Premier Financial Services, LLC, for 2,210 per month, starting August 3, 2007, and ending June 2012.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases a Becker automobile from Power MotorCar Company, for four years, starting February 2008 and ending January 2012, for $2,515 per month.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases a Maserati QP automobile from Maserati Financial Services, beginning June 2007, for $2,548.93 per month, ending May 2011.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases a Mini Cooper automobile, starting January 2006 and ending July 2008 for $227.64 per month.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases a Nissan Quest automobile from Nissan Motor Acceptance for 38 months, beginning June 2007 and ending August 2010, for $633.57 per month.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases a 2007 Volvo automobile from Don Beyer Volvo in Falls Church, Virginia, for $754.54 per month starting June 2007 and ending May 2011.

IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, leases a Volkswagen Beetle automobile from Volkswagen of Downtown Los Angeles for a monthly rate of $401.28, starting September 2007 and ending August 2010 (three years).

Streetfighter Marketing, Inc.

Streetfigher Marketing, Inc., leases office space at 467 Waterbury Court, Gahanna, Ohio, from Streetfighter Group for a monthly rate of $2,000. The lease is for five years, expiring 2011.

Target America, Inc.

Target America, Inc., leases office space at 10560 Main Street, 2^nd floor, Fairfax, Virginia, originally starting March 18, 2005, and ending March 17, 2008, at a monthly rate of $2,750. In January 2008 the lease was renewed for another three years at rates of $2,922.83 for the period beginning April 1, 2008, and ending March 31, 2009; $3,066.73 for the period beginning April 1, 2009, and ending March 31, 2010; and $3,215.12 for the period beginning April 1, 2010, and ending March 31, 2011.

F-21

Target America, Inc., leases equipment for $279.60 per month via lease with GE Capital that expires March 30, 2011.

Note: All leases detailed above are operating leases with the exception of the auto lease for the Becker which is a capital lease.

Operating lease commitments for year 2009 though year 2013 are as follows:

		Total		Real Estate		Vehicles		Equipment
Total 2009	$	510,184	$	417,372	$	78,580	$	14,232
Total 2010		279,864		191,070		74,441		14,354
Total 2011		178,934		124,059		43,038		11,837
Total 2012		105,285		90,834		13,260		1,191
Total 2013		-		-		-		-
	$	1,074,268	$	823,335	$	209,319	$	41,614

Note 10: Stockholders' Equity

Preferred stock

The preferred stock may be issued in series as determined by the Board of Directors. As required by law, each series must designate the number of shares in the series and each share of a series must have identical rights of (1) dividend, (2) redemption, (3) rights in liquidation, (4) sinking fund provisions for the redemption of the shares, (5) terms of conversion and (6) voting rights.

F-20

FG Investment Holdings, LLC

On July 8, 2008, the Company entered into a Series B Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, (the “Agreement”), with FG Investment Holdings, LLC. Under the Agreement, FG Investment Holdings, LLC will purchase up to a total of 2,812,500 shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock at a price of $4,500,000. The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock of the Company in the ratio of 5 shares of common for each share of Series B Preferred Stock. FG Investment Holdings, LLC also received warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock as follows: 6,000,000 shares at $0.352 and 21,875,000 shares at $0.50.

The funding is a trifurcated transaction whereby the First Round Financing consists of $150,000 in exchange for 93,750 shares of Series B Preferred Stock together with a warrant to purchase 6,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price per share of $0.352. The Second Round Financing of $2,250,000 in exchange for 1,406,250 shares of Series B Preferred Stock together with a warrant to purchase 21,875,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.50 per share and the Third Round Financing of $2,100,000 in exchange for 1,312,500 of Series B Preferred Stock requires the Company to meet certain conditions. The Company shall pay a fee to FG Investment Holdings, LLC in the amount of $450,000 simultaneously with the consummation of the Third Closing.

The Agreement requires the Company to register the shares of common stock underlying the Series B Preferred Stock and warrants with the Securities and Exchange Commission upon demand by FG Investment Holdings, LLC.

The Agreement also requires the Company to appoint a director selected by FG Investment Holdings, LLC to the Board of Director of the Company.

Concurrent with entering the Agreement, the parties closed on the First Round Financing.

Liberty Growth Fund, LP

On July 26, 2007, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Liberty Growth Fund LP. Under the Agreement, Liberty could purchase up to a total of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock at a price of $8,000,000. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock of the Company in the ratio of five (5) shares of common for each share of Series A Preferred Stock. Liberty also received warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock as follows: 21,875,000 shares at $.50, callable by the Company with certain cancellable restrictions; 4,000,000 shares at $.50; 6,000,000 shares at $1.00 and 6,000,000 shares at $2.00.

As a condition of the Agreement, the Company issued Lerota, LLC, who acted as an assigned consultant by Liberty to the transaction between the Company and Liberty, a cashless warrant for 3,143,750 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.01 per share in addition to cash fees of $350,000 for the first round and $450,000 for the second round. The warrant is vested and expires July 26, 2012. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.58 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.57 per share, in accordance with SFAS 123(R) using a risk-free interest rate of 4.3%, a dividend yield of 0.0%, a calculated volatility factor of 188% and an expected life of five years. The calculated value of $1,800,000 was recorded as offering costs and charged to additional paid in capital in the financial statements.

The funding was a bifurcated transaction whereby the First Round Financing consisted of $3,850,000 in exchange for 2,187,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The Second Round Financing of $4,500,000 in exchange for 2,812,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock had to be completed within 120 days of the date of the Agreement and required the Company to acquire a company meeting certain requirements.

F-22

If the Company failed to acquire the Second Round Acquisition Target prior to the Second Round closing date, then the Company was to issue an additional 500,000 shares of Preferred Stock to Liberty as a penalty. However, given the pending litigation explained below the Company has not yet issued the shares.

If, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, the Company’s pro forma EBITDA target was not met, then the Company was to issue an additional 1,600,000 shares of Preferred Stock to Liberty as a an additional penalty. However, given the pending litigation explained below the Company has not yet issued the shares.

Further, should the Company be subject to penalties, the Company was also to issue additional warrants to purchase common stock to Lerota, LLC in the amount of 187,500 shares of Common Stock at $.01 for the Acquisition penalty and 825,000 shares of Common Stock for the EDITDA penalty.

The Agreement required the Company to register the shares of common stock underlying the Series A Preferred Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form SB-2 or S-3 and to appoint Mr. Philip A. Seifert, a principal of Liberty Growth Fund LP, to the Board of Directors of the Company.

F-21

Concurrent with entering the Preferred Stock Agreement and related agreements, including an Escrow Agreement whereby Liberty required that the escrow agent be Cardinal Trust and Investment, the parties closed on the First Round Financing. The Company substantially used the funds to complete its acquisition of 55% of IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, and 100% of Target America, Inc.

In an 8-K filing in August 2007 and subsequently in its Sept. 30, 2007, Form 10-QSB, the Company disclosed that on July 26, 2007 (the “Closing Date”) it sold 2,187,500 convertible preferred shares (the “Purchased Securities”) to Liberty Growth Fund L.P (“Liberty”). The closing of the transaction was administered by Cardinal Trust and Investment, a Division of Cardinal Bank (“Cardinal”), acting as Escrow Agent pursuant to a written escrow agreement dated July 19, 2007 (the “Escrow Agreement”). The Company, Liberty and Cardinal were all parties to the Escrow Agreement.

Also on July 26, 2007, pursuant to previously disclosed pre-existing agreements, the Company concurrently closed and acquired 55% of IKON Public Affairs Group, LLC, and 100% of Target America, Inc.

In discussions with Cardinal officials and representatives of Liberty after the Closing Date, the Company was advised that Liberty did not provide the funds required to complete the purchase transaction, and that Lerota LLC, which received a fee for its services in the transaction, returned the cash fee in its entirety to Cardinal.

On August 9, 2007, Cardinal filed suit in the Fairfax County Circuit Court (Civil Action No. 2007-9626), naming Philip August Seifert and Liberty Growth Fund LP as defendants, seeking recovery of funds disbursed by Cardinal together with interest and costs. AIMS Worldwide, Inc., is not a party to the litigation. Mr. Seifert, General Managing Partner of Liberty, died in November 2007.

Since the Closing Date, the Company continued to perform its obligations under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement and related agreements with Liberty. Because of Liberty’s actions and the untimely death of Mr. Seifert, the Company has initiated efforts to secure replacement financing. Although there was no assurance that alternative financing could be timely obtained on reasonable terms or at all, on February 15, 2008, the Company received a proposed term sheet from FG Investments, LLC, and a subsequent investment.

As of December 31, 2007, the Company had not incurred any liabilities under the Stock Purchase Agreement with Liberty for penalties or liquidated damages. The Agreement required the Company to file a registration statement within 45 days of closing the Liberty transaction registering the preferred shares and underlying warrants issued in the first tranche. However, given the pending litigation between Cardinal and Liberty and the demonstrated inability of Liberty to perform its obligations under the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company, with no assurance that its costs and expenses associated with complying with the terms of the second tranche would be met, elected not to proceed with the registration.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 98-5, Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios ("EITF 98-5"), the Company recognized an imbedded beneficial conversion feature present in the convertible preferred stock. The Company recognized and measured an aggregate of $2,500,000, which is equal to the intrinsic value of the imbedded beneficial conversion feature, to additional paid-in capital and a return to the convertible preferred stock holders. Since the preferred shares were convertible at the date of issuance, the return to the preferred shareholders attributed to the beneficial conversion feature has been recognized in full at the date the convertible preferred stock was issued.

~~Common and preferred stock~~F-23

Common stock

During 2009, we issued 1,992,500 shares of common stock as part of acquisition purchases valued at 388,525, 484,277 shares for cash for proceeds of $45,100, 1,784,037 shares for services valued at $247,189, 475,000 shares to guarantee loans valued at 65,814, and 816,406 for debt extinguishment valued at $187,773. The shares issued were recorded at fair value based on the market price on the date of the grant. At December 31, 2009, stock subscriptions totaling $26,000 remained receivable.

During 2008, we issued 6,161,111 shares of common stock for total proceeds of $1,085,700 and 93,750 shares of preferred stock for total proceeds of $150,000. In addition we issued 263,090 shares of common stock for services valued at $112,738 and we issued 1,120,503 shares of common stock valued at $89,640 to investors in IKON's campaign media buying program. The shares issued were recorded at fair value based on the market price on the date of the grant. At December 31, 2008, stock subscriptions totaling $252,500 remained receivable.

During 2007, we issued 2,490,000 shares of common stock for total proceeds of $525,000. In addition we issued 676,827 shares of common stock for services valued at $290,452 and we issued 100,000 shares of common stock valued at $23,000 in payment of trade debt. We issued 825,000 shares of common stock as part of the purchase price for the acquisition of Bill Main and Associates, we issued 650,000 shares of common stock for the acquisition of Target America and we released 1,762,778 shares of common stock that were previously escrowed to complete the acquisition of Target America and IKON. We received and cancelled 200,000 shares valued at $118,000 as consideration for the sale of the Prime Time Subsidiary. The shares issued for services and bonuses were recorded at fair value based on the market price on the date of the grant. At December 31, 2007, stock subscriptions totaling $50,000 remained receivable.

F-22

The shares issued during 2007 for services and bonuses totaled 676,827 distributed eleven individuals and organizations. Total fair value is $290,452.

Fair value was determined for all shares based on closing price on the day of Board approval.

Options and warrants to purchase common stock

Stock and Incentive Compensation Plans

Total compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements at December 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008:

		2008		2007
Stock grants	$	202,378	$	290,452
Stock warrants		-		-
Total compensation cost		202,378		290,452
Income tax		-		-
Net compensation cost	$	202,378	$	290,452

2009

2008

Stock grants

$313,003

$202,378

Stock warrants

Total compensation cost

313,003

202,378

Income tax

Net compensation cost

$313,003

$202,378

All compensation cost has been recognized as of December 31, 2008.

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock options outstanding as of December 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008:

	# of Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractural Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at Dec. 31, 2006	6,200,000	-	-	-
Granted	2,300,000	-	-	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited	-	-	-	-
Expired	-	-	-	-
Outstanding at Dec. 31, 2007	8,500,000	-	-	-
Granted	1,500,000	-	-	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited	-	-	-	-
Expired	-	-	-	-
Outstanding at Dec. 31, 2008	10,000,000	-	2.6122 years	-
Exercisable at Dec. 31, 2008	10,000,000	-	2.61 years	-
Granted	1,500,000	-	5.0 years	-
Exercised	-	-	-	-
Forfeited	-	-	-	-
Expired	________	-	-	-
Outstanding at Dec. 31, 2009	1,500,000	-	2.6 years	-
Exercisable at Dec. 31, 2009	1,500,000	-	2.6 years	-

In ~~2007 and again in~~ 2008, options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock for a period of five years were given to each of four officers or directors of the Company. In addition, ~~a like number of~~ options scheduled to expire in ~~2008~~2009 were extended to expire in ~~2009~~2010. The options, totaling 800,000 shares each year can be exercised at a price that is 125% of the market price at the time the options are exercised. The exercise price of these options will continue to remain above the market price of these shares, introducing a complexity such that it is not possible to estimate the fair value of these options using option pricing models. Accordingly, under SFAS 123R, (paragraph 25) the intrinsic model will be applied to these options. Compensation cost reported each accounting period is based on the change in the intrinsic value. Total compensation cost under the intrinsic model is the excess of the fair value of the stock over the option price. No compensation expense was reported for these options in ~~2007~~2008 or ~~2008~~2007.

In 2007 and again in 2008, options to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock for a period of five years were given to each of three directors at the Company. The options, totaling 1,500,000 shares each year can be exercised at a price that is 110% of the market price at the time the options are exercised. The exercise price of these options will continue to remain above the market price of these shares, introducing a complexity such that it is not possible to estimate the fair value of these options using option pricing models. Accordingly, under SFAS 123R, (paragraph 25) the intrinsic model will be applied to these options. Compensation cost reported each accounting period is based on the change in the intrinsic value. Total compensation cost under the intrinsic model is the excess of the fair value of the stock over the option price. No compensation expense was reported for these options in 2006 or 2007.

F-23

		2007		2006
Total fair value of options vested
during the period	$	-	$	-
Total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the period	$	-	$	-

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding common stock warrants as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:

	Number of Shares	Weighted- Average Exercise Price	Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2006	1,536,000	0.87	3.7 years
Granted	45,531,250	0.69	4.7 years
Exercised	-	-
Forfeited	-	-
Expired	-	-
Outstanding at December 31, 2007	47,067,250	0.69	4.7 years
Granted	27,993,333	0.47	4.5 years
Exercised	-	-
Forfeited	-	-
Expired	-	-
Outstanding at December 31, 2008	75,060,583	.60	3.4 years	$	414,313
Exercisable at December 31, 2008	50,423,080	.68	3.7 years	$	260,438

On July 26, 2007, the Company granted Liberty Growth Fund LP warrants to purchase a total of 25,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share and 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. The warrant is vested and expires July 2012. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.58 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.54 per share, or $20,406,437, in accordance with SFAS 123(R). The expense of $20,406,437 was recorded as share-based payments related to equity financing and charged to capital in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate	4.3%
Dividend yield	0.00%
Volatility factor	188%
Weighted average expected life	3.8 years

On July 26, 2007, the Company granted an intermediary warrants to purchase a total of 4,156,250 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The warrant is vested and expires July 2012. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.58 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.58 per share, or $2,403,804, in accordance with SFAS 123(R). The expense of $2,403,804 was recorded as share-based payments related to equity financing and charged to capital in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate	4.3%
Dividend yield	0.00%
Volatility factor	188%
Weighted average expected life	5 years

F-24

In 2007 and again in 2008, options to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock for a period of five years were given to each of three current and former directors at the Company. The options, totaling 1,500,000 shares each year can be exercised at a price that is 110% of the market price at the time the options are exercised. The exercise price of these options will continue to remain above the market price of these shares, introducing a complexity such that it is not possible to estimate the fair value of these options using option pricing models. Accordingly, under SFAS 123R, (paragraph 25) the intrinsic model will be applied to these options. Compensation cost reported each accounting period is based on the change in the intrinsic value. Total compensation cost under the intrinsic model is the excess of the fair value of the stock over the option price. No compensation expense was reported for these options in 2008 or 2009.

2008

2009

Total fair value of options vested

during the period

Total intrinsic value of options

exercised during the period

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding common stock warrants as of December 31, 2008 and 2009:


	Number of Shares	Weighted- Average Exercise Price	Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2007	47,067,250	0.69	4.7 years
Granted	27,993,333	0.47	4.5 years
Exercised	-	-
Forfeited	-	-
Expired	-	-
Outstanding at December 31, 2008	75,060,583	.60	3.4 years	$	414,313
Granted	3,298,562	.23	4.7 years
Exercised	-	-
Forfeited	(35,531,250)	-
Expired	-	-
Outstanding at December 31, 2009	42,827,895	.68	2.9 years	$
Exercisable at December 31, 2009	42,827,895	.68	2.9 years	$

In November 2007, the Company granted a consultant warrants to purchase a total of 3,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrant is 50% vested and expires in December 2012. The remaining 50% is vested on completion of planned financing. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.23 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.23 per share, or $804,127, in accordance with SFAS 123(R). The expense the vested portion of $402,064 was recorded as share-based payments of prepaid offering costs in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate	4.3%
Dividend yield	0.00%
Volatility factor	183%
Weighted average expected life	5.3 years

Risk-free interest rate

4.3%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

183%

Weighted average expected life

5.3 years

In December 2008, the Company granted Thomas J. Flynn warrants to purchase a total of 33,333 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The warrant is vested and expires December 2011. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.10 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.08 per share, or $2,826, in accordance with SFAS 123(R). The expense of $2,826 was recorded as share-based payments related to equity financing and charged to capital in the accompanying financial statements.

F-25

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate		4.3%
Dividend yield		0.00%
Volatility factor		213%
Weighted average expected life		3.0 years

Risk-free interest rate

4.3%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

213%

Weighted average expected life

3.0 years

In July 2008, the Company granted to FG Holdings warrants to purchase a total of 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.352 per share and 21,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The 6,000,000 warrant is vested and expires July 2012. The 21,875,000 warrant will vest on completion of a second tier of funding. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.18 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.16 per share, or $4,347,841, in accordance with SFAS 123(R). The expense of $953,216 relating to the 6,000,000 share vested warrant was recorded as share-based payments related to equity financing and charged to capital in the accompanying financial statements. The expense of $3,394,625 relating to the 21,875,000 share unvested warrant will be recorded as share-based payments related to equity financing and charged to capital in the financial statements when and if the vesting conditions are met.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate	4.3%
Dividend yield	0.00%
Volatility factor	174%
Weighted average expected life	3.8 years

Risk-free interest rate

4.3%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

174%

Weighted average expected life

3.8 years

In August and September 2008, the Company granted CapWest Securities warrants to purchase a total of 85,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The warrant is vested and expires September 2010. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.20 to $0.10 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.11 per share, or $9,453, in accordance with SFAS 123(R). The expense of $9,453 was recorded as share-based payments related to equity financing and charged to capital in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate	4.3%
Dividend yield	0.00%
Volatility factor	186%
Weighted average expected life	2.0 years

Risk-free interest rate

~~F-25~~4.3%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

186%

Weighted average expected life

2.0 years

In June 2009, the Company granted three individuals warrants to purchase a total of 350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $.352 per share in connection with the debt related to the Brandstand acquisition. The warrants are vested and expire in five years. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.20 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.19 per share, or $67,510, in accordance with SPAS 123(R). The prorated value of the warrants, $56,594 was recorded as share-based payments of discount on the note payable and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the related note payable in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the warrants was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

3.0%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

253%

Weighted average expected life

3.0 years

F-26

In February 2009, the Company granted two consultants warrants to purchase a total of 1,898,562 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The warrants are vested and expire in five years. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.10 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.10 per share, or $182,705, in accordance with SPAS 123(R). The expense of $182,705 was recorded as share-based payments of prepaid offering costs in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

3.0%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

212%

Weighted average expected life

3.8 years

In September 2009, the Company granted two company officers warrants to purchase a total of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.352 per share. The warrants are vested and expire in five years. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.18 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.17 per share, or $17,517, in accordance with SPAS 123(R). The expense of $17,517 was recorded as share-based payments of operating expense in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

3.0%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

239%

Weighted average expected life

3.8 years

In January 2009, the Company granted consultants warrants to purchase a total of 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.352 per share. The warrants are vested and expire in three years. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.10 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.09 per share, or $8,892, in accordance with SPAS 123(R). The expense of $8,301 was recorded as share-based payments of interest expense in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

4.3%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

213%

Weighted average expected life

3.0 years

In September 2009, the Company granted consultants warrants to purchase a total of 120,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.352 per share. The warrants are vested and expire in five years. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.13 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.13 per share, or $15,061, in accordance with SPAS 123(R). The expense of $15,061 was recorded as share-based payments of operating expense in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

3.0%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

236%

Weighted average expected life

3.8 years

In June 2009, the Company granted consultants warrants to purchase a total of 1,406,250 preferred shares, convertible into 7,031,250 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.352 per common share. The warrants are vested and expire in five years. The quoted market price of the common stock was $0.15 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.15 per common share, or $1,027,475, in accordance with SPAS 123(R). The expense of $15,061 was recorded as share-based payments related to equity financing and charged to capital in the accompanying financial statements.

F-27

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

3.0%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

243%

Weighted average expected life

3.8 years

In November 2009, the Company granted two employees warrants to purchase a total of 230,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The warrants are vested and expire in three years. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.11 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.10 per share, or $24,650, in accordance with SPAS 123(R). The expense of $24,650 was recorded as share-based payments of operating expense in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

3.0%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

237%

Weighted average expected life

3.0 years

In July 2009, the Company granted an individual warrants to purchase a total of 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. The warrants are vested and expire in two years. The quoted market price of the stock was $0.23 per share. The Company valued the warrants at an average of $0.21 per share, or $104,806, in accordance with SPAS 123(R). The expense of $104,806 was recorded as share-based payments related to equity financing and charged to capital in the accompanying financial statements.

The fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

3.0%

Dividend yield

0.00%

Volatility factor

268%

Weighted average expected life

2.0 years

Note 11: Segment Information

We report the following information on our business segments as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009:



		Public Affairs		Public Relations		Local Community Marketing		Interactive		AIMSolutions Consulting			Corporate		Total

Revenues	$	3,372,576	$	-	$	1,277,201	$	889,841	$	186,385	$	$	-	$	5,726,003

Gain/loss from	$	($19,612)	$	-	$	(345,540)	$	(6,747)	$	(43,437)	$	$	(1,152,478)	$	(1,567,814)
operations

Net income (loss)	$	(131,013)	$	-	$	(611,854)	$	(8,664)	$	(136,684)	$	$	(1,152,478)	$	(2,140,693)

Significant assets, net	$	946,854	$	-	$	1,445,760	$	631,557	$	303,251	$	$	374,916	$	3,709,338

F-28

We report the following information on our business segments as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008:



		Media		Media		Consulting		Strategy		Public		Digital		Corporate
		Services		Properties		Services		& Planning		Affairs		Marketing		Overhead		Total

Revenues	$	-	$	-	$	229,897	$	839,126	$	11,488,888	$	1,405,149	$	-	$	13,963,060

Gain/loss from	$	-	$	-	$	164,404	$	45,807	$	(2,775)	$	73,749	$	(1,169,090)	$	(887,874)
operations

Net income (loss)	$	-	$	(238,288)	$	164,787	$	(8,864)	$	(97,448)	$	74,367	$	(1,169,060)	$	(1,274,507)

Significant assets, net	$	-	$	-	$	331,246	$	962,747	$	2,944,852	$	2,188,064	$	450,492	$	6,807,401

We report the following information on our business segments as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007:

		Media		Media		Consulting		Strategy		Public		Digital		Corporate
		Services		Properties		Services		& Planning		Affairs		Marketing		Overhead		Total
Revenues	$	-	$	-	$	91,174	$	425,305	$	1,026,665	$	576,315	$	-	$	2,119,459
Loss from
operations	$	-	$	(30,325)	$	(24,641)	$	(468,656)	$	(311,527)	$	(153,288)	$	(1,973,802)	$	(2,962,239)
Loss from discon-
tinued operations	$	(32,183)	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	(32,183)
Net income (loss)	$	(30,562)	$	(267,879)	$	(18,306)	$	(508,674)	$	(226,737)	$	(159,410)	$	(1,978,102)	$	(3,189,670)
Significant assets, net	$	-	$	-	$	231,400	$	913,489	$	2,732,431	$	2,018,706	$	-	$	5,896,026

Note 12: Subsequent Events

OnIn ~~February~~March 4,2010 ~~2009,~~AIMS ~~the~~management ~~Company~~negotiated ~~entered~~agreements ~~into~~with anHamilton ~~agreement~~International ~~with~~Advisors, ~~Maxim Group~~Inc., ~~LLC to provide general financial advisory~~ and ~~investment~~Mindshare ~~banking~~Holdings, ~~services~~Inc. ~~The agreement is effective until terminated by 30 days written notice by either party after June 30~~, ~~2009.~~Hamilton/Mindshare Asloaned ~~consideration for Maxim’s services,~~ the Company ~~will pay a non-refundable monthly fee of~~ $10500,000 ~~for~~in ~~the~~working ~~term~~capital ofwith ~~the~~a ~~agreement. In addition~~$50,000 ~~among~~interest ~~other~~payment ~~terms~~due ~~and~~in ~~conditions,~~August ~~the~~2010 ~~Company~~followed ~~will~~by ~~issue to Maxim or its designees warrants to purchase three percent (3~~10%) of ~~the total shares~~ outstanding ofbalance, ~~the~~secured ~~common~~by ~~stock of~~ the ~~Company~~accounts asreceivable of ~~February 4, 2009. The warrants entitle Maxim to purchase common stock of~~ the Company ~~at an initial exercise price equal to a price to be determined based on then current market price~~. The warrants expire February 4, 2014, and are not exercisable until at least 6 months and 1 day after February 4, 2009. The warrants contain a cashless exercise provision and unlimited piggyback registration rights.

OnIn ~~February~~April ~~27,~~2010 ~~2009,~~AIMS ~~the~~management ~~Company~~renegotiated ~~entered into~~ a ~~non-binding~~February ~~letter~~2009 ofconsulting ~~intent~~agreement ~~for~~with ~~the~~Maxim ~~purchase of BrandStand~~ Group, ~~Inc. The~~alleviating ~~acquisition~~a ~~would~~$10,000 bemonthly ~~consummated upon completion of satisfactory due diligence and agreement as to definitive terms~~fee.

OnIn ~~March~~January ~~10,~~2010 ~~2009,~~the ~~shareholder~~Company ~~Charles~~agreed ~~Brunie~~to ~~lent~~a ~~the~~Third ~~Company~~Amendment ~~$200~~when FG Investments,~~000~~ ~~due~~LLC, inloaned 90the ~~days~~Company oran ~~within~~additional ~~fifteen~~$6,618; ~~days~~in ~~after~~this amendment the Company ~~receives~~agreed ~~additional~~to ~~funding~~an origination fee of $7,623 ~~bearing~~and anwarrants ~~interest~~to ~~rate~~purchase 152,000 shares of 2the 1/Company's common stock at $.352 (35.2 ~~percent~~cents) per ~~month~~share.

~~F-26~~Note 13: Prior Year Restatement:

The Company restated its prior years’ financial statements to account for the reclassification of a portion of its goodwill to intangible assets subject to amortization. In addition the Company restated to recognize impairment of goodwill and the reclassified intangibles. The effect of the restatement resulted in a decrease in beginning 2008 owners’ equity of $4,071,325. The effect on the 2008 statement of operations was an increase in net loss from operations of $217,349.

F-29

Filing Compare · AIMS WORLDWIDE INC